View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Revised 5/11/2011

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Report Highlights

Inside:
Snapshot of MHA Programs

2

Characteristics of First Lien
Modifications

3

Servicer Activity

4

Disposition Path
of Homeowners Canceled
From HAMP Trials

5

New This Month: Second Lien and HAFA Program Results
• Nearly 17,000 homeowners in a first lien HAMP modification received assistance through
the Second Lien Modification Program (2MP). Since homeowners with first lien mortgage
modifications under HAMP become automatically eligible when their second lien servicer
participates in 2MP, this number will continue to grow.
• More than 10,000 homeowners have agreements with their servicer to exit their home
under the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program through a short sale
or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction.
• Nearly 4,500 homeowners have completed a short sale or deed-in-lieu under HAFA, which
provides up to $3,000 for relocation assistance after a homeowner exits the home.

Disposition Path
of Homeowners Ineligible
For HAMP Trials

6

Selected Outreach Measures

7

Waterfall of Eligible Borrowers

7

Results of Compliance Second-Look
Reviews (Revised 5/11/2011)

8

Homeowner Experience

9

Quarterly Results of Compliance Second-Look Reviews
• In Q3 2010, MHA-Compliance initially disagreed with the servicer’s actions 4.0% of the
time, above the YTD 2010 average of 3.7%. After follow-up actions with the servicer, 43%
of those “Disagrees” were cleared.
• During the same time period, MHA-Compliance was unable to determine whether a
servicer acted correctly 15.6% of the time, above the YTD 2010 average of 12.0%. After
the servicer provided more information, 50% of those cases were cleared.
• Beginning next month, Treasury will release a new quarterly compliance scorecard for the
10 largest HAMP servicers to increase transparency around program performance. This
scorecard will grade these servicers on key performance metrics, and provide a peer
comparison.

HAMP Activity by State

10

HAMP Activity by Metropolitan Area

11

Modifications by Investor Type

11

List of Non-GSE Participants

12

Participants in Additional
MHA Programs

13

Definitions of
Compliance Activities

14

Areas of Compliance Emphasis

15

More Than 630,000 Permanent Modifications Started
• Homeowners in active permanent modifications realize real savings, with median monthly
savings of $528 or 37% of the median before-modification payment. Aggregate reductions
in monthly mortgage payments are estimated to total nearly $5.4 billion, program to date.
• New permanent modifications have averaged nearly 28,000 per month for the last six
months. New trial modifications have averaged 28,000 per month over the same period.
• More than 1.5 million homeowners have entered trial modifications since program
inception.

1

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

HAMP Activity: First Lien Modifications

Second Lien Modification Program (2MP) Activity

HAMP is designed to lower monthly mortgage payments to help struggling
homeowners stay in their homes and prevent avoidable foreclosure.

Total
HAMP Eligibility
(As of Jan. 31, 2011)

Trial
Modifications

Permanent
Modifications

Eligible Delinquent Loans1

2,862,627

Eligible Delinquent Borrowers2

1,374,980

Trial Plan Offers Extended (Cumulative)3

1,783,826

All Trials Started

1,522,196

The Second Lien Modification Program (2MP) provides assistance to
homeowners in a first lien modification who have an eligible second lien with
a participating servicer.
All Second Lien Modifications Started

16,951

Note: Number of modifications is net of cancellations, primarily due to servicer data corrections.

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA)

Trials Reported Since January 2011 Report4

29,089

The Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA) offers
incentives for homeowners looking to exit their homes through a short sale or
deed in lieu of foreclosure.

Trial Modifications Canceled (Cumulative)

746,203

All HAFA Agreements Started1

10,177

Active Trials

142,239

HAFA Transactions Completed

4,488

All Permanent Modifications Started

633,754

1 Servicer

Permanent Modifications Reported Since
January 2011 Report

26,147

Permanent Modifications Canceled
(Cumulative)5

76,678

Active Permanent Modifications

557,076

agreement with homeowner for terms of potential short sale, which lasts at least 120 days; or agreement for
a deed-in-lieu transaction. A short sale requires a third-party purchaser and cooperation of junior lienholders to
complete the transaction.

Treasury FHA-HAMP Modification Activity

1 Estimated

eligible 60+ day delinquent loans as reported by servicers as of January 31, 2011, include conventional loans:
 in foreclosure and bankruptcy.
 with a current unpaid principal balance less than $729,750 on a one-unit property, $934,200 on a two-unit property,
$1,129,250 on a three-unit property and $1,403,400 on a four-unit property.
 on a property that was owner-occupied at origination.
 originated on or before January 1, 2009.
Estimated eligible 60+ day delinquent loans exclude:
 FHA and VA loans.
 loans that are current or less than 60 days delinquent, which may be eligible for HAMP if a borrower is in imminent
default.
2 The estimated eligible 60+ day delinquent borrowers are those in HAMP-eligible loans, minus estimated exclusions of
loans on vacant properties, loans with borrower debt-to-income ratio below 31%, loans that fail the NPV test,
properties no longer owner-occupied, manufactured housing loans with title/chattel issues that exclude them from
HAMP, and loans where the investor pooling and servicing agreements preclude modification. Exclusions for DTI and
NPV results are estimated using market analytics.
3 As reported in the weekly servicer survey of large SPA servicers through March 3, 2011.
4 Servicers may enter new trial modifications into the HAMP system of record anytime before the loan converts to a
permanent modification.
5 A permanent modification is canceled when the borrower has missed three consecutive monthly payments. Includes
1,001 loans paid off.

Note: Unless specified, exhibits in this report refer to HAMP first lien modification activity.

The Treasury FHA-HAMP program provides assistance to eligible
homeowners with FHA-insured mortgages.
All Treasury FHA-HAMP Trial Modifications Started
Treasury FHA-HAMP Permanent Modifications Started

2,977
866

Homeowner Benefits for HAMP First Lien Modifications
• Aggregate reductions in monthly mortgage payments for
borrowers who received HAMP first lien permanent modifications
are estimated to total nearly $5.4 billion, program to date.
• The median monthly savings for borrowers in active permanent
first lien modifications is $527.97, or 37% of the median monthly
payment before modification.
See Appendix A2 for servicer participants in additional Making Home
Affordable programs.

2

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

HAMP Trials Started
Cumulative Trial Starts (Left Axis)

All Trials Started (000s)

Monthly Trial Starts (Right Axis)
1,209

1,200

1,257

1,283 1,305

1,329

1,352

1,383

1,413

1,443

1,475

1,502

1,522

1,050

100

956

800
50

400

0
Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

• For homeowners in active permanent modifications:

150

1,138

Dec '09 Jan '10

• Of trial modifications started, 78% of homeowners were at least 60 days
delinquent at trial start. The rest were up to 59 days delinquent or in
imminent default.

200

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan '11

New Trials Started (000s)

1,600

Modification Characteristics

• 60.6% experienced loss of income (curtailment of income or
unemployment)
• 11.6% reported excessive obligation
• 2.8% reported an illness of the principal borrower

Active Permanent Modifications by Modification Step
Interest Rate Reduction

100%

Term Extension

58.8%

Principal Forbearance

30.5%

Feb

Source: HAMP system of record. Servicers may enter new trial modifications into the HAMP system of record anytime
before the loan converts to a permanent modification. For example, 29,089 trials have entered the HAMP system of
record since the prior report; of those, 19,782 were trials with a first payment recorded in February 2011.

Permanent Modifications Started (Cumulative)

Select Median Characteristics of Active Permanent Modifications

All Permanent Modifications Started (000s)

700
600
500
398

400

435

468

496

520

550

580

608

634

347
299

300
231

200

170
117

100

67

0
Dec '09 Jan '10 Feb

Source: HAMP system of record.

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec Jan '11 Feb

Loan Characteristic

Before
After
Modification Modification

Median
Decrease

Front-End Debt-to-Income
Ratio1

45.3%

31.0%

-14.3 pct pts

Back-End Debt-to-Income
Ratio2

79.1%

62.2%

-14.8 pct pts

Median Monthly Housing
Payment3

$1,434.90

$834.73

-$527.97

1 Ratio of housing expenses (principal, interest, taxes, insurance and homeowners
association and/or condo fees) to monthly gross income.
2 Ratio of total monthly debt payments (including mortgage principal and interest, taxes,
insurance, homeowners association and/or condo fees, plus payments on installment
debts, junior liens, alimony, car lease payments and investment property payments) to
monthly gross income. Borrowers who have a back-end debt-to-income ratio of greater
than 55% are required to seek housing counseling under program guidelines.
3 Principal and interest payment.

3

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Conversion Rate1

HAMP Modification Activity by Servicer
As of Jan. 31,
2011
Estimated
Eligible 60+ Day
Delinquent
Borrowers1

Trial Plan
Offers
Extended2

All HAMP
Trials
Started3

American Home Mortgage
Servicing Inc

50,896

34,154

29,927

21,966

4,553

19,499

Aurora Loan Services, LLC

28,278

50,191

39,407

14,962

1,857

13,358

393,553

493,042

365,962

111,601

43,410

96,607

CitiMortgage, Inc.

94,815

173,440

128,405

48,749

6,033

43,996

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

14,881

70,290

58,092

40,282

4,112

35,633

Green Tree Servicing LLC

7,627

8,220

9,756

5,051

1,137

4,666

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,
NA5

202,133

294,322

233,653

85,376

22,449

71,657

Litton Loan Servicing LP

41,142

40,143

35,884

10,159

1,929

8,443

Nationstar Mortgage LLC

30,934

30,456

53,704

25,310

4,162

23,060

Ocwen Loan Services LLC

44,479

45,486

42,519

31,122

5,194

25,385

OneWest Bank

40,064

66,416

49,835

25,487

3,642

23,145

PNC Mortgage6

12,874

24,133

19,227

5,487

837

4,988

Saxon Mortgage Services,
Inc.

22,932

42,740

37,768

14,698

1,291

13,133

Select Portfolio Servicing

17,609

66,666

40,980

20,878

1,477

18,166

US Bank NA

14,263

16,043

16,120

10,427

2,912

9,368

Wells Fargo Bank, NA7

157,785

302,951

219,424

85,734

15,379

77,402

Other SPA Servicers8

20,728

25,133

23,630

14,242

2,360

12,457

Servicers9

179,987

NA

117,903

62,223

19,505

56,113

633,754

142,239

557,076

Servicer

Bank of America, NA4

Other GSE

Total

1,374,980

Cumulative

1,783,826 1,522,196

1 Estimated eligible 60+ day delinquent borrowers as reported by
servicers as of January 31, 2011, include those in conventional loans:
 in foreclosure and bankruptcy.
 with a current unpaid principal balance less than $729,750 on a
one-unit property, $934,200 on a two-unit property, $1,129,250
on a three-unit property and $1,403,400 on a four-unit property.
 on a property that was owner-occupied at origination.
 originated prior to January 1, 2009.

Estimated eligible 60+ day delinquent borrowers excludes:
 Those in FHA and VA loans.
 Those in loans that are current or less than 60 days delinquent,
which may be eligible for HAMP if a borrower is in imminent
default.
 Those borrowers with debt-to-income ratios less than 31% or a
negative NPV test.
 Owners of vacant properties or properties otherwise excluded.
Exclusions for DTI and NPV are estimated using market analytics.

As of Feb. 28, 2011
All HAMP
Permanent
Active
Modifications Active Trial
Permanent
Started3
Modifications3 Modifications3

Of Eligible Trials Started Post-6/1/10:

41% Converted to Permanent Modification
2% Are Awaiting Decision

63% Converted to Permanent Modification
28% Are Awaiting Decision

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%
Average Trial
Length at
Conversion
(months):

3.6

3.3

3.6

3.2 3.1

4.4

3.0

5.0 6.4

3.3

6.3

4.3 3.7

4.4

3.6

7.7 4.0

4.7

Note: Per program guidelines, effective June 1, 2010 all trials must be started using verified income. Prior to June 1, some
servicers initiated trials using stated income information.
1 As measured against trials eligible to convert – those three months in trial, or four months if the borrower was at risk of
default. Permanent modifications transferred among servicers are credited to the originating servicer. Trial modifications
transferred are reflected in the current servicer’s population.

Aged Trials1
10,000

9,909

7,645

7,500

About 32,000 active trials were initiated at least six months ago.

5,000

2

As reported in the weekly servicer survey of large SPA servicers
through March 3, 2011.
As reported into the HAMP system of record by servicers. Excludes
FHA-HAMP modifications. Subject to adjustment based on
servicer reconciliation of historic loan files. Totals reflect impact of
servicing transfers.
4 Bank of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home
Loans Servicing LP, Home Loan Services and Wilshire Credit
Corporation.
5 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
6 Formerly National City Bank.
7 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under
Wachovia Mortgage, FSB.
8 Other SPA servicers are entities with less than 5,000 estimated
eligible 60+ day delinquent borrowers as of January 31, 2011, that
have signed participation agreements with Treasury and Fannie
Mae. A full list of participating servicers is in Appendix A.
9Includes servicers of loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. Includes GSE loans transferred from SPA servicers.

Of Trials Started Pre-6/1/10:

100%

3

2,500

2,441

2,003 1,897

1,733 1,696
946

814

0

1

As of February 28, 2011. Active trials initiated at least six months ago.

801

561

556

343

236

197

114

91

34

4

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Disposition Path
Homeowners in Canceled HAMP Trial Modifications
Survey Data Through January 2011 (8 Largest Servicers)
Homeowners Whose HAMP Trial Modification Was Canceled Who Are in the Process of:

Servicer
American Home
Mortgage Servicing Inc.

Action
Pending1

Action Not
Allowed –
Bankruptcy Borrower
in Process Current

Short Sale/
Alternative Payment
Deed-in- Foreclosure Foreclosure
Modification
Plan2 Loan Payoff
Lieu
Starts
Completions

Total
(As of
January
2011)

385

34

210

1,982

18

63

158

408

41

3,299

Bank of America, NA3

46,624

5,416

21,637

72,282

456

2,953

21,834

28,449

4,392

204,043

CitiMortgage Inc.

17,480

3,792

5,764

30,034

1,029

1,509

1,803

9,821

2,133

73,365

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

1,590

387

1,070

5,668

229

318

744

1,767

1,149

12,922

JP Morgan Chase Bank
NA4

9,381

782

3,498

59,420

353

3,659

5,613

22,962

9,087

114,755

Litton Loan Servicing LP

2,547

585

1,657

12,777

278

148

1,133

2,029

710

21,864

896

803

570

9,995

325

23

965

4,106

2,919

20,602

Wells Fargo Bank NA5

2,517

718

13,373

60,452

950

7,344

4,632

17,889

10,822

118,697

TOTAL
(These 8 Servicers)

81,420
14.3%

12,517
2.2%

47,779
8.4%

252,610
44.4%

3,638
0.6%

16,017
2.8%

36,882
6.5%

87,431
15.4%

31,253
5.5%

569,547
100.0%

OneWest Bank

Note: Data is as reported by servicers for actions completed through January 31, 2011.
1 Trial loans that have been canceled, but no further action has yet been taken.
2 An arrangement with the borrower and servicer that does not involve a formal loan modification.
3 Bank of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Home Loan Services and Wilshire Credit Corporation.
4 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
5 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under Wachovia Mortgage, FSB.
Note: Excludes cancellations pending data corrections and loans otherwise removed from servicing portfolios.

The most common causes of
trial cancellations from all
servicers are:
• Insufficient documentation
• Trial plan payment default
• Ineligible borrower:
first lien housing expense is
already below 31% of
household income

5

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Disposition Path
Homeowners Not Accepted for HAMP Trial Modifications
Survey Data Through January 2011 (8 Largest Servicers)
Homeowners Not Accepted for a HAMP Trial Modification Who Are in the Process of:

Servicer

Action
Pending1

Action Not
Allowed –
Bankruptcy Borrower
in Process Current

Short Sale/
Alternative Payment
Deed-in- Foreclosure Foreclosure
Modification
Plan2 Loan Payoff
Lieu
Starts
Completions

Total
(As of
January
2011)

American Home
Mortgage Servicing Inc.

1,820

689

6,034

25,087

712

363

1,148

5,004

630

41,487

Bank of America, NA3

33,694

6,517

40,772

57,457

1,790

2,965

26,162

51,419

15,677

236,453

CitiMortgage Inc.

40,693

8,898

8,533

30,047

6,078

12,413

1,908

8,463

5,067

122,100

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

24,444

5,959

32,143

36,833

4,281

2,553

5,969

21,375

10,464

144,021

JP Morgan Chase Bank
NA4

72,116

4,119

88,176

108,089

1,044

32,357

13,429

46,402

11,624

377,356

Litton Loan Servicing LP

8,701

3,793

7,809

15,974

945

576

4,348

8,656

3,406

54,208

OneWest Bank

5,906

2,954

24,190

9,650

1,934

723

2,541

13,326

5,608

66,832

Wells Fargo Bank NA5

15,774

4,225

46,583

54,917

1,628

9,442

10,954

18,313

13,500

175,336

TOTAL
(These 8 Servicers)

203,148
16.7%

37,154
3.1%

254,240
20.9%

338,054
27.8%

18,412
1.5%

61,392
5.0%

66,459
5.5%

172,958
14.2%

65,976
5.4%

1,217,793
100.0%

Note: Data is as reported by servicers for actions completed through January 31, 2011.
1 Homeowners who were not approved for a HAMP trial modification, but no further action has yet been taken.
2 An arrangement with the borrower and servicer that does not involve a formal loan modification.
3 Bank of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Home Loan Services and Wilshire Credit Corporation.
4 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
5 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under Wachovia Mortgage, FSB.
Note: Excludes loans removed from servicing portfolios.

The most common causes of
trials not accepted from all
servicers are:
• Insufficient documentation
• Ineligible borrower:
first lien housing expense is
already below 31% of
household income
• Ineligible mortgage

6

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Selected Homeowner Outreach Measures
Homeowner Outreach Events Hosted Nationally by
Treasury and Partners (cumulative)
Homeowners Attending Treasury-Sponsored Events
(cumulative)

Waterfall of Estimated Eligible Borrowers
51

51,515

Not all 60+ day delinquent loans are eligible for HAMP. Other characteristics may preclude
homeowner eligibility. Based on the estimates, of the 5.0 million homeowners who are currently
60+ days delinquent, 1.4 million homeowners are eligible for HAMP. As this represents a pointin-time snapshot of the delinquency population and estimated HAMP eligibility, we expect that
more homeowners will become seriously delinquent between now and the end of 2012, and
some of those homeowners will be eligible for HAMP.
6

Servicer Solicitation of Borrowers

(cumulative)1

7,212,168

3,562,243

Page views on MakingHomeAffordable.gov
(cumulative)

112,968,102

1

Source: Survey data provided by SPA servicers. Servicers are encouraged by HAMP to solicit information from
borrowers 60+ days delinquent, regardless of eligibility for a HAMP modification.

Borrowers Receiving Free Housing
Counseling Assistance Through the
Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline
Source: Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline.

4.5

4

3.7
3

3.1

HAMP
Estimated
Eligible 60+
Day
Delinquent
Borrowers

2.9
2.9

2

2.1

1.9

Program to
Date

February

2,055,042

73,413

981,480

34,270

1.4
1.4

1

Call Center Volume

Total Number of Calls Taken at 1-888995-HOPE

Loans (Millions)

5

Page views on MakingHomeAffordable.gov
(February 2011)

HAMP-Eligible
60+ Day
Delinquent
Loans (GSE and
SPA Servicers)

5.0

0
1st Lien,
60+ Days
Delinquent

Less: NonParticipating
HAMP
Servicer

Less:
FHA or
VA

Less: NonOwnerOccupied at
Origination

Less: Jumbo HAMPNonEligible
Conforming
Loans
Loans and
Loans
Originated
After 1/1/2009

Less: DTI
Less Than
31%

Less:
Negative
NPV

Less:
Vacant
Properties
And Other
Exclusions**

Estimated
HAMPEligible
Borrowers

** Other exclusions include: no longer owner-occupied; unemployed borrowers; investor’s pooling and
servicing agreement precludes modification; and manufactured housing loans with titling/chattel issues that
exclude them from HAMP.
Note: Chart refers only to borrowers eligible for the first lien modification program.
Sources: Fannie Mae; monthly survey of participating servicers for January 31, 2011. Total 60+ day
delinquency figure derived from 4th Quarter 2010 MBA National Delinquency Survey. Excluded loans are as
reported by large servicers by survey who have signed a servicer participation agreement for HAMP.

7

Revised 5/11/2011

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Results of Compliance Second-Look Reviews (Q3 2010)
Making Home Affordable-Compliance (MHA-C) conducts Second Look1 reviews of homeowner loan files that were not in HAMP modifications,
to ensure that the servicers’ actions were appropriate.
Results of Q3 2010 Second Look Reviews
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Average of Q3
Unable To
Determine:
15.6% (YTD
Average: 12.0%)

40%
30%
20%
10%

Average of Q3
Disagrees: 4.0%
(YTD Average:
3.7%)

0%

AHMSI

Bank Of America

Citi

MHA-C Disagrees

Chase

2

GMAC

Litton

MHA‐C Unable To Determine

3

OneWest

Wells

GROUP AVERAGE

MHA-C Agrees

*Results for servicers with multiple operating platforms are averages across all platforms sampled.
• MHA-C initially disagreed with the servicer’s actions (Disagree) related to 4.0% of the loans
reviewed during the quarter (as compared to 3.7% YTD).
• An average of 15.6% of initial loan file reviews resulted in an Unable to Determine status,
above the YTD average of 12.0%. MHA-C is conducting targeted reviews to assess the reason
for the increase. Additionally, American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc.’s increasing trend of
loans in the Disagree category has been the subject of targeted follow-up; subsequent months
have indicated improvement. Half of Litton Loan Servicing’s Disagrees for the month of August
were resolved with additional documentation, and one of the drivers of the remaining
disagrees relates to timing of borrower communications.
• For Disagree or Unable to Determine results, actions typically required of servicers are:
reevaluating loans not offered HAMP modifications; submitting additional documentation to
support the initial denial reason; clarifying loan status; engaging in process remediation or
other actions as directed by Treasury. For such results, servicers are reminded of their
obligation to forestall foreclosure of the loan until the items are resolved.
1 Second

• The results of MHA-C’s follow-up activities for Disagree and Unable to Determine loans are
shown in the table below. Historically, 88% of Disagrees and 91% of Unable to Determine loans
had outcomes commensurate with Program compliance objectives.
Cleared

Remediated

Positive
Outcome

Negative
Outcome

Disagree

43%

17%

28%

12%

Unable to Determine

50%

9%

32%

7%

Note: Chart figures will not total 100%, as items currently being reviewed are omitted.

• The results of Second Look reviews help determine the types of other compliance activities and
the frequency with which those activities will be conducted. Please see Appendix B for a
detailed description of compliance activities.

Look Results are derived from a statistical sample of loan files for borrowers not in a HAMP modification (typically 100 loan files). Chart shows results for largest servicers; an additional 50 servicers were evaluated
in the 3rd quarter of 2010.
2 Cases where the borrower was not appropriately solicited or evaluated for HAMP.
3 Cases where MHA-C was unable to determine if the servicer’s actions were appropriate without further information from the servicer.

8

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Homeowner Experience (8 Largest Servicers)
Servicer Complaint Rate to Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline
(Program to Date, Through February)

Average Speed to Answer Homeowner Calls (January)
60

Average Speed to Answer Calls to
Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline for
January: 5.1 Seconds

40

11%

Program to Date Average: 6.5%

10%
% of Calls for Specific
Servicer

50

Seconds

Program to date, there have been 1,007,086 calls to the Homeowner’s
HOPETM Hotline regarding a specific SPA servicer, of which 6.5% included
complaints. Below shows specific complaint rates.

30
20

9%
8%
7%
6%
5%

10

4%
3%

0
Calls to
Bank of
Servicer: America NA

OneWest

Am. Home
Servicing

GMAC

CitiMortgage

Wells Fargo

Litton

JP Morgan
Chase NA

Source: Survey data through January 31, 2011 from servicers on call volume to loss mitigation lines; Homeowner’s
HOPETM Hotline.

13,202

Bank of
America NA

21,707

Litton

GMAC

Am. Home
Servicing

1,417

2,634

1,827

CitiMortgage

Wells Fargo

5,685

8,759

Source: Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline.
Note: Complaint rate is the share of a specific servicer’s call volume that are complaints (e.g., for all calls about OneWest, 10.4%
included complaints.)

Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline
Average Call Abandon Rate for
January: 1.5%

60

Target: 30 Calendar Days

50
Calendar Days

4%

JP Morgan
Chase NA

Servicer Time to Resolve Third-Party Escalations
(Program to Date, Through February)

Call Abandon Rate (January)
5%

OneWest

Complaints
(PTD):
217

3%

2%

1%

40
30
20
10
0

0%
Bank of
America

Wells Fargo

Litton

Am. Home
Servicing

JP Morgan
Chase NA

CitiMortgage

OneWest

Source: Survey data through January 31, 2011, from servicers on call volume to loss mitigation lines;
Homeowner’s HOPETM Hotline.

GMAC

Bank of
America NA

Resolved:
4,250
Cases (PTD)

JP Morgan
Chase NA

Am. Home
Servicing

OneWest

2,606

362

637

CitiMortgage Wells Fargo

959

Litton

GMAC

500

696

2,471

Source: HAMP Solutions Center. Target of 30 calendar days, effective Feb. 1, 2011, includes
an estimated 5 days processing by HAMP Solutions Center.

9

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

HAMP Activity by State
State

Active Permanent
Trials Modifications Total

% of
Total

State

Modification Activity by State

Active Permanent
Trials Modifications Total

% of
Total

AK

60

235

295

0.0%

MT

172

606

778

0.1%

AL

866

3,218

4,084

0.6%

NC

2,479

10,337

12,816

1.8%

AR

311

1,224

1,535

0.2%

ND

28

94

122

0.0%

AZ

5,547

26,943

32,490

4.6%

NE

207

750

957

0.1%

CA

32,910

132,881

165,791 23.7%

NH

649

2,577

3,226

0.5%

CO

1,658

7,827

9,485

1.4%

NJ

4,597

17,938

22,535

3.2%

CT

1,664

7,080

8,744

1.3%

NM

476

1,763

2,239

0.3%

DC

240

945

1,185

0.2%

NV

3,507

14,632

18,139

2.6%

DE

454

1,717

2,171

0.3%

NY

6,875

24,841

31,716

4.5%

FL

18,606

65,555

84,161

12.0%

OH

3,218

12,525

15,743

2.3%

GA

5,387

20,257

25,644

3.7%

OK

387

1,258

1,645

0.2%

HI

586

2,111

2,697

0.4%

OR

1,481

6,112

7,593

1.1%

IA

391

1,412

1,803

0.3%

PA

2,971

11,570

14,541

2.1%

ID

574

2,114

2,688

0.4%

RI

707

2,908

3,615

0.5%

IL

7,586

30,089

37,675

5.4%

SC

1,355

5,297

6,652

1.0%

IN

1,457

5,473

6,930

1.0%

SD

56

223

279

0.0%

KS

359

1,302

1,661

0.2%

TN

1,544

5,703

7,247

1.0%

KY

557

2,119

2,676

0.4%

TX

4,229

14,117

18,346

2.6%

LA

973

2,903

3,876

0.6%

UT

1,247

5,261

6,508

0.9%

MA

3,412

13,947

17,359

2.5%

VA

3,175

13,753

16,928

2.4%

MD

4,446

17,951

22,397

3.2%

VT

127

455

582

0.1%

ME

437

1,522

1,959

0.3%

WA

2,887

10,831

13,718

2.0%

MI

4,385

18,652

23,037

3.3%

WI

1,450

5,507

6,957

1.0%

MN

2,110

10,179

12,289

1.8%

WV

190

867

1,057

0.2%

MO

1,484

5,918

7,402

1.1%

WY

62

293

355

0.1%

MS

533

2,155

2,688

0.4%

Other*

1,170

1,129

2,299

0.3%

HAMP Modifications

* Includes Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Note: Includes active trial and permanent
modifications from the official HAMP system of
record.

5,000 and lower

20,001 – 35,000

5,001 – 10,000

35,001 and higher

10,001 – 20,000

Mortgage Delinquency Rates by State

Source: 4th Quarter 2010
National Delinquency
Survey, Mortgage
Bankers Association.

60+ Day Delinquency Rate
5.0% and lower

10.01% - 15.0%

20.01%

5.01% - 10.0%

15.01% - 20.0%

and higher

10

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

15 Metropolitan Areas With Highest HAMP Activity

Metropolitan Statistical Area
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa
Ana, CA
New York-Northern New JerseyLong Island, NY-NJ-PA
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario,
CA
Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI

Active
Trials

Total
Permanent
HAMP
Modifications Activity

Modifications by Investor Type (Large Servicers)

% of All
HAMP
Activity

9,606

38,492

48,098

6.9%

8,854

33,966

42,820

6.1%

6,728

29,751

36,479

5.2%

7,307

29,082

36,389

5.2%

Servicer

GSE

Private Portfolio

Total

83,755

48,823

7,439

140,017

42,871

35,243

15,992

94,106

46,883

13,782

32,116

92,781

CitiMortgage, Inc.

29,127

4,376

16,526

50,029

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

23,056

5,881

10,808

39,745

Ocwen Loan Services LLC

6,954

23,490

135

30,579

Bank of America, NA1
JP Morgan Chase NA2
Wells Fargo Bank, NA

3

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano
Beach, FL

7,764

25,863

33,627

4.8%

Nationstar Mortgage LLC

20,380

5,523

1,319

27,222

Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ

4,427

22,209

26,636

3.8%

OneWest Bank

12,881

11,914

1,992

26,787

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria,
DC-VA-MD-WV

4,431

19,339

23,770

3.4%

American Home Mortgage
Servicing Inc.

1,325

22,727

0

24,052

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA

4,305

16,386

20,691

3.0%

Select Portfolio Servicing

501

16,705

2,437

19,643

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV

2,931

12,015

14,946

2.1%

Aurora Loan Services, LLC

7,307

7,693

215

15,215

Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI

2,704

11,255

13,959

2.0%

Saxon Mortgage Services Inc.

1,475

11,363

1,586

14,424

US Bank NA

8,332

20

3,928

12,280

Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL

2,860

10,514

13,374

1.9%

87

10,266

19

10,372

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont,
CA

2,823

10,152

12,975

1.9%

PNC Mortgage4

5,041

284

500

5,825

2,416

9,981

12,397

1.8%

Green Tree Servicing LLC

5,386

400

17

5,803

Remainder of HAMP Servicers

78,464

6,436

5,535

90,435

Total

373,825

224,926

100,564

699,315

Boston-Cambridge-Quincy,
MA-NH
Sacramento-Arden-ArcadeRoseville, CA
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos,
CA

2,342

9,495

11,837

1.7%

2,262

9,491

11,753

1.7%

A complete list of HAMP activity for all MSAs is available at
http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/financial-stability/results/MHA-Reports/

Litton Loan Servicing LP

1 Bank

of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Home Loans Services and
Wilshire Credit Corporation.
Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
3 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under Wachovia Mortgage, FSB.
4 Formerly National City Bank.
2 J.P.

Note: Figures reflect active trials and permanent modifications.

11

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Appendix A1: Non-GSE Participants in HAMP
Servicers participating in the HAMP First Lien Modification Program may also offer additional support for homeowners, including Home Affordable
Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA), a forbearance for unemployed borrowers through the Unemployment Program (UP), and Principal Reduction
Alternative (PRA).
AgFirst Farm Credit Bank
Allstate Mortgage Loans & Investments,
Inc.
American Eagle Federal Credit Union
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc
AMS Servicing, LLC
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Bank of America, N.A.1
Bank United
Bay Federal Credit Union
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Bramble Savings Bank
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
CCO Mortgage
Central Florida Educators Federal Credit
Union
Centrue Bank
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Citizens 1st National Bank
Citizens Community Bank
Community Bank & Trust Company
Community Credit Union of Florida
CUC Mortgage Corporation
DuPage Credit Union
Eaton National Bank & Trust Co
Farmers State Bank
Fay Servicing, LLC
Fidelity Homestead Savings Bank
First Bank
First Financial Bank, N.A.
First Keystone Bank

First Safety Bank
Franklin Credit Management Corporation
Franklin Savings
Fresno County Federal Credit Union
GFA Federal Credit Union
Glass City Federal Credit Union
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Grafton Suburban Credit Union
Great Lakes Credit Union
Greater Nevada Mortgage Services
Green Tree Servicing LLC
Hartford Savings Bank
Hillsdale County National Bank
HomEq Servicing
HomeStar Bank & Financial Services
Horicon Bank
Horizon Bank, NA
Iberiabank
IBM Southeast Employees' Federal Credit
Union
IC Federal Credit Union
Idaho Housing and Finance Association
iServe Residential Lending LLC
iServe Servicing Inc.
J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, NA2
Lake City Bank
Lake National Bank
Liberty Bank and Trust Co.
Litton Loan Servicing
Los Alamos National Bank
Magna Bank

1 Bank of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing
LP, Home Loan Services and Wilshire Credit Corporation.
2 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
3 Formerly National City Bank.
4 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under Wachovia
Mortgage, FSB.

Mainstreet Credit Union
Marix Servicing, LLC
Midland Mortgage Company
Midwest Bank & Trust Co.
Midwest Community Bank
Mission Federal Credit Union
MorEquity, Inc.
Mortgage Center, LLC
Mortgage Clearing Corporation
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Navy Federal Credit Union
Oakland Municipal Credit Union
Ocwen Loan Services LLC
OneWest Bank
ORNL Federal Credit Union
Park View Federal Savings Bank
Pathfinder Bank
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
PNC Bank, National Association
PNC Mortgage3
Purdue Employees Federal Credit Union
QLending, Inc.
Quantum Servicing Corporation
Residential Credit Solutions
RG Mortgage Corporation
Roebling Bank
RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing
Corporation
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
Schools Financial Credit Union
SEFCU

Select Portfolio Servicing
Servis One Inc., dba BSI Financial Services,
Inc.
ShoreBank
Silver State Schools Credit Union
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Stanford Federal Credit Union
Sterling Savings Bank
Suburban Mortgage Company of New
Mexico
Technology Credit Union
The Golden 1 Credit Union
U.S. Bank National Association
United Bank
United Bank Mortgage Corporation
Vantium Capital, Inc.
Vist Financial Corp.
Wealthbridge Mortgage Corp.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA4
Wescom Central Credit Union
Yadkin Valley Bank

12

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Appendix A2: Participants in Additional Making Home Affordable Programs
Second Lien Modification Program (2MP)
Bank of America, NA1
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Community Credit Union of Florida
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Green Tree Servicing LLC
iServe Residential Lending, LLC
iServe Servicing, Inc.
J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, NA2
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
OneWest Bank
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
PNC Bank, National Association
PNC Mortgage 3
Residential Credit Solutions
Servis One Inc., dba BSI Financial Services, Inc.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA 4

FHA First Lien Program (Treasury FHA-HAMP)
Amarillo National Bank
American Financial Resources Inc.
Aurora Financial Group, Inc.
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Bank of America, NA1
Capital International Financial, Inc.
CitiMortgage, Inc.
CU Mortgage Services, Inc.
First Federal Bank of Florida
First Mortgage Corporation

Franklin Savings
Gateway Mortgage Group, LLC
GMAC Mortgage, LLC.
Green Tree Servicing LLC
Guaranty Bank
iServe Residential Lending, LLC
iServe Servicing, Inc.
James B. Nutter & Company
J.P.Morgan Chase Bank,NA2
M&T Bank
Marix Servicing, LLC
Marsh Associates, Inc.
Midland Mortgage Company
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Ocwen Loan Services LLC
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
PNC Mortgage 3
RBC Bank (USA)
Residential Credit Solutions
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
Schmidt Mortgage Company
Select Portfolio Servicing
Servis One Inc., dba BSI Financial Services, Inc.
Stockman Bank of Montana
Wells Fargo Bank, NA 4
Weststar Mortgage, Inc.

FHA Second Lien Program (FHA 2LP)
Bank of America, NA1
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation
GMAC Mortgage, LLC.
Green Tree Servicing LLC
J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, NA2
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
PNC Bank, National Association
PNC Mortgage 3
Residential Credit Solutions
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
Select Portfolio Servicing
Wells Fargo Bank, NA 4

Rural Housing Service Modification Program
(RD-HAMP)
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Bank of America, N.A. 1
Horicon Bank
J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, NA 2
Magna Bank
Marix Servicing, LLC
Midland Mortgage Company
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Wells Fargo Bank, NA 4

1 Bank of America, NA includes Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Home
Loan Services and Wilshire Credit Corporation.
2 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA includes EMC Mortgage Corporation.
3 Formerly National City Bank.
4 Wells Fargo Bank, NA includes all loans previously reported under Wachovia Mortgage FSB.

13

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Appendix B1: Description of Compliance Activities
Note: Areas of compliance emphasis and servicer-specific

compliance data will be updated quarterly.

Description of Compliance Activities
Freddie Mac, serving as Compliance Agent for
Treasury’s Home Affordable Modification
Program (HAMP), has created a separate
division known as Making Home Affordable ‐
Compliance (MHA‐C). Using a risk‐based
approach, MHA‐C conducts a number of
different types of compliance activities to
assess servicer compliance with HAMP
guidelines for those servicers that have signed
a servicer participation agreement with
Treasury, in their servicing of those loans for
which Treasury pays incentives (non‐GSE
loans), as described below.
On-Site Reviews: Implementation – Reviews
to assess the servicer’s overall execution of
HAMP. Areas covered include, but are not
limited to, solicitation, eligibility, underwriting,
document management, payment processing,
reporting, and governance. MHA-C performs
reviews of larger servicers on not less than a
semi‐annual schedule and reviews smaller
servicers on at least an annual schedule.
On-Site Reviews: Readiness & Governance –
Reviews to assess the servicer’s preparedness
for complying with new or future HAMP
requirements or to research a trend or
potential implementation risk. MHA-C

performs such reviews as needed, determined
by frequency of new program guidance.
NPV Reviews – Reviews to assess the
servicer’s adherence to the HAMP NPV
guidelines. For those servicers that have
elected to recode the NPV model into their
own systems (recoders), MHA-C assesses
whether the servicer’s recoded NPV model is
accurately calculating NPV and whether the
servicer’s model usage is consistent with
HAMP guidelines. Recoders are subject to
off‐site testing at least quarterly and to on‐site
reviews at least semi‐annually. For servicers
using the Treasury NPV Web Portal, MHA-C
reviews data submissions to the Portal on a
monthly basis, and conducts on-site reviews as
necessary to evaluate data submission issues.
Loan File Reviews – Reviews of samples of the
servicer’s non‐performing loan portfolio
primarily to assess whether required steps in
the modification process have been
documented in the loan files and whether loan
modification decisions were appropriate. This
includes reviews of loans that have
successfully converted to a permanent
modification, to ensure they meet the HAMP
guidelines. It also includes reviews of loans
that have not been offered HAMP
modifications, to ensure that their exclusion
was appropriate (“Second Look” reviews).

MHA-C conducts these Loan File reviews on a
statistical sample for each servicer (typically
100 loan files per larger servicer). Larger
servicers’ non-performing loan portfolios are
sampled and reviewed on a monthly cycle.
MHA-C statistically samples and reviews
smaller servicers’ non-performing loan
portfolios on a quarterly or semi ‐annual cycle.
Incentive Payment Reviews – Reviews to
assess the accuracy and validity of Treasury
incentive payments to borrowers and
investors, including whether borrower
payments are appropriately allocated to
borrowers’ loan principal in accordance with
HAMP guidelines. MHA-C performs such
reviews at least annually on the largest
servicers.
(See next page for Areas of Compliance
Emphasis)

14

Making Home Affordable Program
Servicer Performance Report Through February 2011

Appendix B2: Areas of Compliance Emphasis
The past two years have seen substantive change
in MHA programs as well as in the MHA operations
of participating servicers. As new programs have
been implemented and guidance has matured,
Treasury’s compliance goal first and foremost has
been to ensure that homeowners are
appropriately treated in accordance with MHA
guidelines and have the opportunity to avoid
foreclosure.
In 2011, Treasury will focus more intently on
ensuring that servicers are maturing their MHA
processes, accurately and timely processing MHA
transactions, and employing appropriate internal
governance efforts. Treasury will accomplish this
by conducting more targeted or focused reviews,
assessing servicer Quality Assurance or Internal
Audit coverage of MHA activities, and enhancing
the level of compliance-related information
included in the MHA monthly reports.
The following are current areas of emphasis for
MHA‐C.
Cancellations
Servicers are required to comply with HAMP
guidance when canceling loans in HAMP trials. The
Second Look review process conducted by MHA-C
has, and will continue to include, a focus on
evaluating servicers’ cancellation activities,
especially those around servicers’ timely and
appropriate decisioning and borrower
communications.
MHA-C has performed targeted reviews of the
cancellations of aged trials and will continue these

reviews over the course of the next several
months. MHA-C is evaluating whether servicers
are making appropriate cancellation decisions,
with a specific focus on those loans where the
cancellation reason indicates that the borrower
had not made timely payments. Servicers are
required to maintain documentation supporting
cancellation decisions and evidence that borrower
notifications are provided timely with all required
information.
Pre-Foreclosure Certification
Due to recent concerns around foreclosures and
the issuance of related guidance in June 2010,
MHA-C is focusing on pre-foreclosure activities and
certification requirements. Servicers may not refer
any loan to foreclosure or conduct a scheduled
foreclosure sale without first satisfying the
"reasonable effort" solicitation standard and
borrower communication requirements described
in HAMP guidelines. In addition, within seven
business days of a scheduled foreclosure sale,
servicers must provide the foreclosure attorney or
trustee with a written certification that the
servicer has satisfied the requirements to solicit
and evaluate eligible borrowers as defined by
HAMP guidelines, and that all other available loss
mitigation alternatives have been exhausted and a
non-foreclosure outcome could not be reached.
These reviews will include:
• Processes for satisfying the "reasonable effort"
standard and for ensuring that consideration of
MHA programs and borrower notifications are
executed and appropriately documented; and

• Processes for completing consideration of HAMP
and other foreclosure alternatives, as
appropriate, prior to any foreclosure referral or
foreclosure sale; and
• Processes for providing foreclosure attorneys or
trustees with accurate and timely certifications
prior to a scheduled foreclosure sale.
IR2 Reporting and Data Integrity
Servicers are required to submit HAMP loan-level
data to the program’s system of record (IR2), and
that data is required to be accurate and consistent
with source documentation. IR2 data is used to
monitor and report on HAMP activity levels and to
calculate servicer, borrower, and investor
incentive payments. As stated in prior reports,
reporting and data integrity controls continue to
be a focus. MHA-C conducted preliminary data
mapping exercises with the Program Administrator
and will be assessing servicers' information
technology (IT) controls over IR2 reporting over
the coming months, with an emphasis on system
interfaces and reconciliations of data between
systems.
MHA-C will continue testing IR2 data against
source documentation, including loan files, with
particular attention on the data elements used in
the establishment of borrower payments and the
calculation of incentives. MHA-C will also continue
to review servicers’ calculations for accuracy and
consistency with HAMP guidelines.

15