View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

R EG IO N AL EC O N O M IC ISSUES
W o rkin g P a p e r S e rie s

M a n u f a c t u r i n g 's C h a n g e o v e r to S e r v i c e s
in th e G r e a t L a k e s E c o n o m y

William A. Testa

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K
O F C H IC A G O



WP- 1989/21

Manufacturing's Changeover to Services
in the Great Lakes Economy
William A. Testa*
The much-ballyhooed economic shift from manufacturing to services raises
many important questions, not the least of which concerns our understanding
of the nation’s economic structure. Is "what is good for General Bullmoose"
still “good for the U.S.A.”? Are we still tied to manufacturing? The latter
question is especially relevant to the Great Lakes economy because of its
strong historical dependence on manufacturing as its economic base. In
earlier years, it was possible to monitor the Great Lakes economic
performance as an outgrowth of its manufacturing sector. Now, this
understanding of the region's economic structure has come under scrutiny as
the region's growth in manufacturing output has trailed total regional product,
and as manufacturing’s employment share has plummeted (Tables 1-2).
This paper provides information to show that, although manufacturing’s role
has diminished, the manufacturing sector retains a critical role as the engine
of the Great Lakes economy. When compared to the U.S., the manufacturing
sector remains highly concentrated in the region. Moreover, in viewing the
manufacturing industry alone, the importance of manufacturing to the Great
Lakes economy is shown to be understated. Much of what used to be
regarded as manufacturing in the Great Lakes region can now be found under
the guise of the service sector. While the manufacturing sector has lost
ground to the service sector, this can be partly explained by the service sector
taking over some of the work of manufacturing companies. For this reason,
the region's economic ties to manufacturing, as broadly defined to include
services purchased by manufacturing companies, are shown to remain very
strong.

Measuring a Region's Orientation to an Industry
In assessing whether the national economy is changing its orientation to manufacturing-whether the economy is deindustrializing or reindustrializingother studies have deflated manufacturing and other industry output so
*The author gratefully acknowledges the research assistance of Michele L. Edwards who was
provided by the Ameritech fellowship program.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




1

as to look at shares of ’’real" product by industry. Such an approach is
appropriate for large national economies wherein a large portion of what is
produced by the nation is also consumed. If so, a constant share of real
industry output, e.g. manufacturing, reflects the fact that the nation maintains
its standard of living in producing and, ultimately, consuming goods from the
industry sector.
T a b le 1

Manufacturing employment
Great Lakes
U.S.
(---------thousands ------- )

Manufacturing/
total employment
Great Lakes U.S.
(----- percent ---- )

Concentration index;
Great Lakes vs.
United States

1969

5,953

20,531

29.1

22.9

1.27

1970

5,633

19,677

27.7

21.9

1.26

1971

5,383

18,851

26.6

20.9

1.27

1972

5,506

19,344

26.5

20.9

1.27

1973

5,871

20,414

27.1

21.1

1.29

1974

5,813

20,402

26.5

20.7

1.28

1975

5,209

18,660

24.3

19.2

1.27

1976

5,403

19,375

24.6

19.4

1.27

1977

5,625

20,094

24.8

19.4

1.27

1978

5,835

20,964

24.8

19.4

1.28

1979

5,850

21,490

24.3

19.3

1.26

1980

5,338

20,776

22.8

18.5

1.23

1981

5,213

20,643

22.4

18.2

1.23

1982

4,717

19,254

20.9

17.1

1.22

1983

4,593

18,899

20.3

16.6

1.22

1984

4,885

19,850

20.7

16.6

1.24

1985

4,879

19,768

20.1

16.0

1.25

1986

4,817

19,479

19.4

15.4

1.25

Note: The Great Lakes region is herein defined by the states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

However, in assessing the importance of an industry sector to a smaller
geographic area, such as a state or region, it is income accruing from the
industry sector which more often reflects an industry’s importance to the

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




2

region. The industry in question as the region’s economic engine, be it
manufacturing or agriculture or mining, must generate sufficient income for
its residents to maintain the area's population and/or standard of living. This
is so regardless of real output produced by the sector. For example, the State
of Illinois may have increased soybean production by ten-fold in comparison
to 20 years ago when measured by a real quantity such as bushels. But ifthe
price of soybeans has fallen one hundred fold, the industry's importance in
supporting jobs and income in the state will have fallen.
T a b le 2
M an u fa c tu rin g and to ta l o u tp u t in T h e G re a t Lakes
an d U .S .-1 9 6 3 and 1986

Manufacturing output_______
Total output_______
Great Lakes
U.S.
Great Lakes U.S.
—
)
(-------------— $ billion 1982=100)-

Mfg./Total output
Great Lakes U.S.

1963

130

397

416

1,863

31.3

21.3

1969

174

537

530

2,395

32.8

22.4

1979

208

697

644

3,138

32.3

22.2

1980

186

665

612

3,111

30.4

21.4

1981

183

676

612

3,166

29.9

21.4

1982

163

635

582

3,104

28.0

20.5

1983

173

675

596

3,205

29.0

21.1

1984

199

758

645

3,433

30.9

22.1

1985

208

790

669

3,569

31.1

22.1

1986

213

812

691

3,681

30.8

22.1

Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gross State Product Estimates.

Direct Earnings From Manufacturing
One way of measuring the region's ties to the manufacturing sector, then, is to
look at labor earnings paid out to the region's residents by manufacturing
firms. These earnings, which accrue from both proprietor’s income and from
the wages and salaries of employees, indicate the current share of income
flowing into the pockets of the region's residents from manufacturing as
opposed to other industry sectors.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989,W P -1989-21




3

As recently as 1967, 38 percent of the region's earnings derived from
manufacturing in comparison to 29 percent for the overall nation, the same as
1947 (See Table 3). By 1987, however, manufacturing's share of labor
income had dropped precipitously in both the Great Lakes region and the U.S.
Nationally, manufacturing accounted for only 20 percent of labor income by
1987. In the Great Lakes region, the share had fallen from 38 percent, down
to 29 percent of labor income.

Table 3
Labor and proprietor's Income In manufacturing
as a share of total labor earnings
1947

1957

/

1967

1977

\/

nprr'f'nt---pwl
UOIII - -

\

1987

Illinois

34.7

35.7

33.3

30.0

20.9

Indiana

38.7

43.1

42.3

41.1

33.3

Michigan

46.0

46.4

44.2

43.6

35.7

Minnesota

18.8

23.7

25.3

23.8

22.9

Ohio

41.9

44.2

41.5

39.0

31.0

Wisconsin

35.7

39.3

37.2

35.1

29.9

Great Lakes* (5)

39.5

41.5

39.3

37.3

29.2

Great Lakes (6)

37.9

40.2

38.2

36.2

28.6

Rest of U.S.

25.0

27.8

26.4

23.3

18.5

U.S.

28.2

30.9

29.1

26.2

20.4

'excludes Minnesota.
Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

In absolute terms, then, the manufacturing industry has been shrinking as a
source of earnings for the region. Relative to the nation, however, the region
remains specialized in manufacturing. The implication is that manufacturing
fortunes continue to have a magnified impact on the household income of
Great Lakes residents in comparison to the nation.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1 9 8 9 ,W P-1989-21




4

The Hidden Manufacturing Sector
In tracking the manufacturing sector’s contribution to regional income, one
must consider that the activities involved in manufacturing can move from
one industry sector to another as the underlying economics dictate. In fact,
the boundaries of the set of activities which we call "manufacturing" are fluid
and not fixed. For example, a steel-producing company may shed its
maintenance workforce and contract out or "outsource" maintenance work to a
service sector company. Accordingly, an activity which was formerly
counted as manufacturing output could now be counted under the service
sector even though, perhaps, die physical amount of steel produced by the
economy has remained the same.
Recently, the U.S. industrial companies have been rapidly changing through
takeovers, mergers, and internal restructuring as U.S. companies have
divested and recombined activities under new corporate umbrellas. One
motivation behind this broad movement has been the desire to "unbundle" inhouse support services such as clerical, data processing, maintenance, and
strategic planning.1 In the process of producing manufactured goods,
industrial manufacturing companies produce and/or purchase important
services whose value becomes embodied into the final value of the
manufactured goods. These business service sectors include computer and
data processing, telecommunications, temporary office help, accounting,
finance, insurance, real estate, wholesaling, advertising, and managerial
consulting. In order to boost productivity and to trim costs, companies have
increasingly chosen to purchase support services from outside firms rather
than continue to generate the services within the company.
In Table 4 we examine the inputs purchased from major service sectors by key
manufacturing sectors in the Great Lakes economy. Generally speaking, most
industries have significantly increased their purchases of service inputs when
measured against their own overall activity. These industries include food
processing, printing, chemicals and drugs, and communications equipment.
However, other industry notables such as farm and garden machinery and
engines and turbines report the opposite effect.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, WP-1989-21




5

Table 4
Purchased services by selected manufacturing industries
according to the 1963 and 1983 U.S. Input-Output Tables

Industry

Ratio of
purchased
services to
value added

Ratio of
purchases from
SIC 73 to
value added

1963

1963

1983

1983

Great Lakes
employment

Great Lakes
index of
concentration
relative to U.S.

1986

1986

(000's)
Food and kindred products

.42

.48

.11

.14

291,626

1.07

Printing and publishing

.29

.35

.06

.13

326,467

1.16

Chemicals and selected
chemical products

.23

.53

.05

.13

60,225

.89

Drugs, cleaning and
toilet preparations

.52

.59

.35

.37

70,985

1.24

Primary iron and
steel manufacturing

.25

.27

.03

.04

192,695

2.41

Engines and turbines

.17

.14

.04

.03

47,795

2.62

Farm and garden machinery

.30

.18

.08

.03

32,175

1.92

Construction machinery

.20

.17

.03

.04

71,110

1.68

Metalworking machinery

.15

.12

.03

.04

140,111

2.67

Electrical industrial
equipment and apparatus

.16

.20

.03

.04

89,904

1.72

Radio, T.V., and
communication equipment

.17

.53

.05

.15

91,939

.65

Motor vehicles and equipment

.19

.20

.04

.06

303,369

2.08

Note: The services purchased are from the following sectors: transportation and warehousing, communications, radio and
T.V. broadcasting, real estate and rental, finance and insurance, and business services. The SIC 73 industry is defined as
business services--e.g. data processing, advertising, window washing.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Business, and Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




6

Although experiences were mixed among individual industries, the aggregate
trend toward greater use of purchased services can be illustrated for the
manufacturing sector by comparing "services purchased by manufacturing"
from the 1963 and the 1983 Input-Output Table o f the United States (BEA).
Therein, the ratio of purchased services to the activity of manufacturing
companies increased from 25 percent to 32 percent over the 1963-83 period
(Table 5).
T a b le 5

Services purchased by all manufacturing industries
Services as a percent of value added in manufacturing
Purchased from_______________ ______________ 1963_____________________1983________________
Transportation and warehousing

6.0

7.2

Communications (except radio and T.V.)

1.1

1.2

Wholesale and retail trade

8.1

9.6

Finance and insurance

1.5

2.0

Real estate and rental

2.4

2.3

Business services

6.2

9.8

25.4

32.0

Total

Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, “Input-Output Tables of the U.S.”

Another way of viewing the increasing importance of the service sector to
manufacturing involves the manufacturing value added data that are produced
by the Bureau of the Census. The Bureau's method in computing value added
is somewhat peculiar because it includes, not only the manufacturing
company's contribution to the value of products, but also the value of
intermediate services purchased by the company. This peculiarity is useful
for our purposes because a parallel "value added" (called "gross product
originating") is concurrendy produced by the BEA and itdoes not include the
value of purchased services. With some minor adjustments, we can estimate
the value of services purchased by manufactures by taking the simple
difference between Census value added for the nation and the BEA's estimate
of manufacturing activity.2 As a reference point, we present purchased
services as a share of total activity, both manufacturing and purchased
services, i.e., Census value added in manufacturing. In doing so, it is seen

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




that these services would have comprised less than 10 percent of
manufacturing value added in 1957 (Figure 1). By 1977, this figure had
climbed to over 18 percent By 1987, the last reported year, purchased
services were estimated to occupy 25 percent of overall manufacturing
activity.3

Figure 1
Purchased services by manufacturers
percent of value added

At the same time that purchased services are expanding, service-type activities
are also becoming an increasingly important component of the value of
manufactured goods within the firm itself. One recent study reports that the
payroll share of auxiliary establishments of manufacturing firms, i.e.,
corporate headquarters, R & D labs, data processing centers etc., increased
from 6 percent in 1958 to almost 11 percent in 1986 (Israilevich and Testa
1989). In part, this phenomenon has much to do with the changing and
sophisticated nature of today's products and services. As one effect, many
physical products are jointly consumed by final customers in conjunction with
services provided by manufacturing companies such as user training and
product repair. As another effect, many more of today's manufacturing
employees support the manufacturing process through advertising, product

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P ap er
O ctober 1989, WP-1989-21




8

design and research, and corporate planning. Still others are involved in
product sales and distribution. The overall effect can best be illustrated by
citing a concrete example. Xerox Corp. is reported as a manufacturing
company. Yet, only one of seven of its employees are actually engaged in the
activity of "manufacturing" or physical assembly of itsproducts.

Manufacturing Found
The upshot of the increasing service orientation of manufacturing companies
and the "unbundling” of many service activities from manufacturing
companies is that a growing segment of the Great Lakes economy has moved
into the service sector which would have formerly been recognized as
manufacturing. Consequently, by attributing these activities to the service
sector, we are understating manufacturing's contribution to both the national
and regional economy.
Accordingly, it would be helpful if we could consistently measure, using a
stable definition, a larger or "manufacturing-augmented" sector over time so
as to comprehend any real changes to the region's economic base. In
particular, services purchased locally by manufacturers are conceptually
equivalent to manufacturing in being part of the region’s traded goods sector
or "economic base". If a local service becomes embodied into the value of a
manufactured good and that good is ultimately exported from the region, then
the value of the service is concurrently exported. Accordingly, we define the
manufacturing sector broadly to include these "purchased services" of
manufacturers. In doing so, the movement of these services between the
manufacturing and service industry sectors will not affect our reckoning of the
region's economic structure and base.
In considering this augmented manufacturing sector which includes purchased
services, a far different picture of the importance of manufacturing to the
region emerges (Table 6). For the portion of the United States excluding the
Great Lakes, the decline in the share of manufacturing earnings is muted (in
percentage change terms) by the inclusion of purchased services, although it
has still declined, from 32.4 to 24.4 over the past 24 years. This result arises
from the growing role of services which was illustrated in Figure 1. Many of
these related services are being outsourced to parts of the service sector.
In the Great Lakes region, the role of manufacturing as a stable source of
regional income is also pronounced. When services purchased by Great

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




9

Lakes manufacturers are included with the manufacturing sector proper, labor
income derived from this sector amounted to 36.8 percent in 1987. Moreover,
the region's concentration in manufacturing relative to the nation continued to
exceed the nation by over 50 percent.4

Table 6
Manufacturing and augmented manufacturing sector earnings
(Including purchased services) as a percent of total earnings
Manufacturing sector earninqs/total earnings
1963____________ 1983_____________1987
Great Lakes Region

38.5

32.3

28.6

Rest of U.S.

26.5

21.8

18.5

Index (G.L./U.S.)

1.45

1.48

1.55

G.L. share of U.S. (percent)

29.3

23.8

20.4

Augmented manufacturing
sector earnings/total earnings
1963

1983

1987

Great Lakes Region

47.7

41.7

36.8

Rest of U.S.

32.4

28.7

24.4

Index (G.L./U.S.)

1.47

1.45

1.51

G.L. share of U.S. (percent)

36.4

31.2

26.7

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; and staff estimates.

As a word of caution, however, these estimates are dependent on a number of
crude assumptions, not the least of which is that the region retains a share of
manufacturing-supporting activities in its service sector that is proportionate
or larger to its manufacturing sector proper. This could mean that services
purchased by Great Lakes manufacturing companies are purchased locally and
not from outside the region. Alternatively, service exports by the region's
service sectors to outside manufacturers are sufficient to offset any
"leakages”, i.e., services purchased by Great Lakes manufacturers from
outside the region.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




10

Location of Purchased Services: How Does the Region Fare?
There isa wide geographic range over which services are traded. This implies
that services purchased by manufacturers cannot be thoughtlessly assigned to
the same location as the manufacturing companies themselves.
It is now being recognized that, similar to traded goods, services are
increasingly "exported" across regional boundaries. Two examples among
many of the wide-ranging export of services can be cited from the North
American continent alone (Daniels 1984). In the United States, a recent
survey of 2000 firms in the Puget Sound area found that approximately 34
percent of service production was sold outside the region. Over 1100 firms
drawn from the transport services, FIRE, business and professional services,
and utilities and communications reported that over 10 percent of their sales
were made to the outside (Beyers, Alvine, and Johnson 1985). And across our
northern border in Canada, data collected from more than 400 establishments
in mining, manufacturing, retailing, wholesaling, retail trade, and business
services, show that only 44 percent of the flow of expenditure on business
services originated within the home region consisting of the townships of
eastern Quebec Province (Polese 1982).
The causes behind a reported expansion of business services tell us something
of the spatial implications of service location and the region-to-region
direction of service flows. While the causes behind the trend toward servicerelated manufacturing are not completely understood, several reasons have
been advanced. J.I. Gershuny has pushed the thesis that economies have
moved toward being "self service" economies over the course of the 20th
century. Much of the underlying growth in services employment overlies a
transition from personal service employment to substitution of manufactured
products which are operated by the consumer (1978; 1983). These products
include home appliances, television, and cars. However, these products must
be supported (i.e. jointly consumed) by a growing mass and variety of
business service functions. Accordingly, labor has become increasingly
employed in complementary functions to manufacturing such as education
and training in the use of products, research and design, sales and service,
packaging and distribution, and the repair of manufactured goods.
This expansion of manufacturing-related service activity can be partly seen
from the general expansion of business service employment. The business
services sector, SIC 73, which includes such activities as computer

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




11

programming, data processing, temporary help agencies, and maintenance
firms, almost doubled in employment from 1976 to 1986 in the U.S. (Table 7).
Robust growth was also recorded for the closely related categories of legal
services and finance, insurance and real estate.

Table 7
U.S. employment in business-type services
Percent of total
U.S. employment
1976
1986

Change
in jobs
1976-1986

Percent change
1976-1986

(000's)
Transportation and
communications

4.6

4.3

670.5

23.2

Wholesale trade

6.8

6.5

1,191.9

28.1

Fire, insurance, and
real estate

6.9

7.4

1,872.9

43.3

Business services

6.1

9.0

3,697.1

96.7

.6

.9

382.5

105.3

25.0

28.1

7,814.8

50.0

Legal
Total business services

Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Census, County Business Patterns.

There has also been a significant tendency toward the vertical disintegration
of manufacturing firms and the need to contract out service functions. The
economics of specialization and division of labor has evolved into a situation
in which manufacturing companies themselves are contracting out an
increasing volume and proportion of related service activity. Service
activities that were formerly performed by manufacturers are now performed
by service companies. In summarizing the literature to this effect, P.W.
Daniels states: "The ability of organizations to create their output by
employing the appropriate specialist staff in-house has decreased as
occupational skills and knowledge, especially in information and technologyrelated activities, have become highly specific and therefore expensive to
retain. It is now becoming more cost-effective, even in large enterprises, to
buy in services if only because those providing them are, through their
continuing and diverse experience with the specialization, able to provide the
most up-to-date and comprehensive service."5 This phenomenon is not
universally true for all functions. Certainly, the advent of the personal

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989.W P -1989-21




12

computer has led to adoption of services "in house" for many firms (J.N.
Marshall 1989). Nonetheless, most studies suggest the opposite on net. For
example, Rajan and Pearson estimate that out of 700,000 jobs created in
distribution, finance, and business services in the U.K between 1979 and
1985, perhaps 300,000 arose from contracting out by non-specialist producers
(1986).
Still another explanation for the service-growth phenomena is offered (for the
U.S. economy) by Jane Sneddon Little (1989).
In part, the U.S.
manufacturing evolution toward service orientation derives from the dollar's
50 percent appreciation between late 1979 and 1985. As a result, employment
reportedly shifted from the industries most susceptible to foreign competition
to those which were less vulnerable. The latter industries include serviceoriented manufacturing industries specializing in research, design, and
customer service. As a consequence, Little reports the number of
nonproduction workers in manufacturing to have risen by 615,000 in the U.S.
from 1979 to 1985 while production workers fellby 2 million. These changes
were not subsequently reversed with the dollar's depreciation. Rather, the
structural changes have become embedded in the U.S. economy.

Urban Business Service Hubs
The spatial and geographic implications of these trends on regional growth
and development are beginning to emerge. These business service functions
exhibit an agglomerative or synergistic tendency to locate in proximity to one
another in large urban areas. Face-to-face contact continues to be important
for many producer service functions, including those with client relationships.
In addition, the attraction of a diverse and highly skilled labor pool, highly
developed transport, and communication facilities also contributes to mutual
siting of such functions. Highly-concentrationed business-service activity in
particular urban areas accordingly flows outward in an urban-hierarchy to
smaller metro areas in exchange for manufactured and other goods.
Within the urban hierarchy, i.e.,the system of citiesby size class, opinions are
widely shared that many of the largest metro areas have benefitted from the
specialization and expansion of business services. Evidence to this effect can
be found in the 1980s turn-around in urban-rural growth of the U.S. in the
1970s. Vertical disintegration and continued specialization of service
functions require close proximity of these varied functions to each other. For
this reason, Stanback and Noyelle believe that the expansion of producer

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




13

services is strengthening the position of the many of the larger cities in the
hierarchy. Rather than harboring manufacturing functions, successful cities
are those which can support a myriad of functions including producer
services, financial and legal specialists, corporate headquarters and divisional
offices, professional and trade organizations and other highly specialized
support functions (1980; 1982).
However, not all service functions have experienced a sharpened locational
advantage in urbanized areas. Advances in telecommunications have allowed
data processing operations such as credit card processing and airline
reservations to be outsourced to rural or less urban locales where labor costs
are lower.

Interregional Specialization
The inter-regional implications of this business service specialization are
relevant in assigning manufacturing support services to particular states and
regions. Across U.S. regions, these trends suggest that service flows will, if
anything, tend to originate in the regions hosting business service firms and
the corporate headquarters offices of manufacturers and flow toward those
peripheral regions that are specialized in branch production plants.
Evidence from the U.K suggests that services provided internally by the
manufacturing firm are largely concentrated ator near corporate headquarterstype facilities of industrial companies. These services are either produced by
the corporate facilities themselves or else purchased from nearby service
producers and exported from head offices to branch locations (Marshall
1977). For example, Crum and Gudgin have found that branch plants in the
U.K. have a greater tendency to maintain organizational service linkages
rather than local service linkages the farther they are from London (1977).
So, too, Burrows and Town report that branches are more likely to purchase
services such as banking, insurance, accounting and legal services from
outside the area (1971). Such tendencies have also become evident in studies
of organizational changes. In a study of corporate takeovers occurring in the
food, chemicals, textiles, and clothing industries in the U.K., Lee and North
found that, in studying takeovers and mergers, local service linkages were
severed and substituted with both internal services and service arrangements
with service firms that were located in proximity to the new, aggressor
company (1978) (see also Smith 1979).

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




14

However, while the bulk of the evidence suggests that a high concentration of
corporate headquarters offices and other ancillary establishments to the
manufacturing firm is indicative of both internal and external service flows to
peripheral or "branch plant" regions, this connection cannot be made with
certainty. Headquarters also rely on the purchase of specialized computer,
financial, and trade services which may be purchased from outside the region.
And certain internal services have displayed a decentralization tendency in the
direction of branch plants. For example, in a recent study of the automotive
industry in the U.K., Marshall reports that product distribution functions are
being decentralized to peripheral locations which enjoy easier access to
market (1989).
But despite these caveats, the best working assumption in tracking the
interregional flow of services related to manufacturing across U.S regions is
that services purchased by manufacturers flow away from headquarters-type
facilities and toward production branches. Accordingly, those regions with
ample shares of corporate headquarters and other specialized service
establishments of manufacturing companies are also likely to retain their
respective share of services that are directly purchased by manufacturers from
service firms.

Manufacturing auxiliaries in the Great Lakes region
The Great Lakes region has managed to hold onto its pre-eminent share of
auxiliary activities over the past three decades (Table 8). The Great Lakes'
share of the nation’s payroll for auxiliary manufacturing establishments has
held constant at 31-32 percent of the nation. This is surprising in light of the
fact that the region's share of total payroll has concurrently slipped to 27
percent and payroll at nonauxiliary establishments slipped to 26 percent. In
1958, the region's economy was no more specialized in these auxiliary service
activities than the nation. Since then, the Great Lakes region has climbed to a
relative specialization in auxiliary activity which was approximately 19
percent greater than the nation in 1986 (as measured by C M payroll data).
Increasingly, then, the region has become more specialized in these servicetype activities that are generated by manufacturing companies themselves.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




15

Nor has the region's increasing specialization in auxiliary activity occurred
solely because manufacturing production plant activity has migrated to other
regions, leaving behind an isolated and dwindling corporate headquarters
presence. The auxiliary establishment base has grown in absolute terms.
While the region lost over 500,000 jobs in overall manufacturing between
1976 and 1986, manufacturing employment at auxiliary establishments is
estimated to have increased by over 33,000 according to County Business
Patterns (Table 9). As a result, employment at auxiliary establishments
increased from 42 percent above the nation in 1976 to 62 percent by 1986.

Table 8
Great Lakes shares of auxiliary and nonauxiliary payroll
____________________Great Lakes share of U.S. manufacturing
Total payroll___________________ Auxiliary payroll_______________ Nonauxiliary payroll
1958

30.7

31.0

30.7

1963

30.7

32.3

30.6

1967

30.7

32.8

30.6

1972

30.9

33.0

30.7

1977

30.9

34.8

30.6

1982

25.2

32.5

24.4

1986

26.9

31.9

26.3

Concentration index of auxiliary payroll-Great Lakes versus U.S.
Illinois
1958

1.01

Indiana
.29

Michigan
1.84

Minnesota

Ohio

Wisconsin

Great Lakes

1.19

.79

.55

1.01

1963

1.07

.34

1.74

1.25

.87

.63

1.05

1967

1.05

.27

1.73

1.62

.90

.70

1.07

1972

1.09

.32

1.61

1.54

1.00

.55

1.07

1977

1.28

.35

1.57

1.80

.95

.69

1.13

1982

1.59

.31

1.74

1.67

1.23

.82

1.29

1986

1.40

.33

1.42

1.82

1.14

.80

1.19

Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Census of Manufactures.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, WP-1989-21




16

Table 9
Employment concentration in selected business service industries-Great Lakes Region

Manufacturing auxiliaries
Other industry auxiliaries
Motor freight-transport and warehousing
Water transportation
Transportation by air
Transportation services
Communications
Wholesale trade-durable goods
Wholesale trade-nondurable goods
Depository institutions (SIC 60 & 61)
Securities and commodities brokers
Insurance (SIC 63 & 64)
Real estate
Real estate and combined
Holding & other investment offices
Business services
-advertising
-mailing, reproduction, art and photo
-services to buildings
-computer programming & software
-computer-related services NEC
-research and development labs
-management and public relations
Legal services
Membership organizations
Engineering and architectural service
Noncommercial research organizations
Accounting, auditing, bookkeeping
Total (all above services)

Index of
concentration
versus U.S.
1976
1986

G.L. employment
1986

Change in employment
1976-1986

(000's)

(000‘s)

406.5
336.1

33.3
106.0
17.4

1.42
.92
1.07

1.62
93
1.08

.6
27.0
23.5
-9.4
98.8
62.8
94.6
29.1
81.1
24.4
-1.4

.24
.61
.76
.80
.98
.86
.89
.69
.97
.80
.69

-5.6
408.6
12.2
23.5
36.6
19.8
7.4
5.0
57.3
53.9
107.5
39.4
-1.5
30.9
1,221.1

1.19
.85
1.04
1.01
.76
.71
.56
.89
.82
.82
1.07
.78
.46
.93
.93

.32
.73
.81
.78
1.00
.95
.90
.76
1.05
.72
.65
.86

274.1
10.4
72.9
47.7
190.8
626.7
408.1
429.7
55.8
390.5
170.3
3.1
35.1
808.7
38.4
44.3
101.2
27.4
9.1
19.5
97.2
120.1
362.7
99.1
4.7
76.2
4,922.4

.90
1.06
1.15
.82
.63
.69
.68
.89
.83
1.10
.72
.34
.91
.95

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, County Business Patterns.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




17

Other business service categories are generally less concentrated in the region
than in the U.S., though this reflects a high employment concentration in
manufacturing rather than weakness in service industry per se (Table 9). In
addition, auxiliaries of nonmanufacturing industry sectors are less
concentrated here, although the Great Lakes region has gained slightly on the
U.S. in this regard. And overall, business services increased in concentration
in the Great Lakes region over the 1976-86 period. Of course, unlike
manufacturing auxiliary employment, these business services serve
nonmanufacturing industries as well as manufacturing. Accordingly, trends in
these business service categories alone do not necessarily reflect any
increasing tendency in backward linkages,from manufacturing companies to
service firms over the 1976 to 1986 period.
The fact that the region hosts a significantly larger share of its manufacturing
activity in auxiliary activity than the nation suggests that the region is a net
exporter rather than a net importer of inter-regional service flows between the
service sector and manufacturing. On the other hand, some particular services
may run counter to this assumption. For example, New York’s pre-eminence
in the advertising industry probably represents net regional import of services
by the Great Lakes region's manufacturers of consumer products. However,
the increasing tendancy of the Great Lakes region as an intra-firm service
provider to manufacturing suggests that this assumption of net service export
ismore reliable in the present than in the past.

Conclusions
The role of the Great Lakes region continues to evolve away from
manufacturing production activity and towards service provision.
Nonetheless, this should not be confused to mean that the region maintains a
weak linkage to manufacturing. Much of the apparent growth in service
activity is closely linked with manufacturing activity within the region and
elsewhere. Moreover, manufacturing activity itself, as measured by labor
income derived from this industry, remains significantly above the nation's
average. For these reasons, the strength of manufacturing nationwide and
within the region will continue to call the tune of the Great Lakes economy in
the foreseeable future.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




18

Footnotes
^For a discussion see Peter F. Dracker, "Sell the Mailroom", Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, July
25,1989.
9

xThe BEA gross domestic product includes indirect taxes (except property). For comparison
purposes with Census value added, the BEA figure is reduced by 4 percent. The other notable
difference is that the Census calculates inventory change using the data as reported by the
manufacturer. BEA adds to these "book value" inventories an inventory valuation adjustment
which converts themto a replacement cost valuation (see CM 1977 p. XXHI).
o
This data construction is only meant to be suggestive of the overall growth of service inputs into
the manufacturing process. The value of purchased services themselves will include purchases
from other sectors including manufacturing, construction, and government. In other words, the
value of purchased services is not strictly a "value added" by the service sector alone.
^The methodology is as follows: First, we estimated the purchased services percent of
manufacturing value added for each 2-digit manufacturing industry for the U.S. by subtracting
U.S. value added (adjusted for indirect taxes) fromBEA GPO in manufacturing:
% purchased service = (V A ^ j - GPO^j) - (GPO^j)

for each industry i. This percent or augmentation factor was applied to both the industry-specific
earnings distribution for the Great Lakes region and for the U.S. Accordingly, the differing
industry mix between the region and U.S. will affect the estimated volume and proportion of
purchased services. In addition, we are assuming that aU services are purchased locally although,
as we will discuss in the following section, this need not be the case.
^See P.W. Daniels,
Chapter 7, p. 157.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




S e rv ic e In d u s trie s : A

G e o g ra p h ic a l A p p ra isa l

, Methenen, London, 1985,

19

References
Beyers, William B., Michael J. Alvine and Erik G. Johnsen, The Service
Economy : Export o f Services in the Central Puget Sound Region,April 1985.
Browne, Lynn E., "High Technology and Business Services", New England
Economic Review ,July/August 1983 p. 5-17.

Burrows, M. and S. Town, Office services in the East Midlands, East
Midlands Economic Planning Council for the Department of the Environment,
London,1971.
Buss, Nicholas, The Integration o f High Tech Industry in a Local Economy: A
Study o f Linkage Structure in the Chicago Region, Dept, of Geography,

University of Illinois.
Crum, R. and G. Gudgin, "Non-Production activities in United Kingdom
manufacturing industry", Regional Policy Series 3 , Commission of the
European Communities, Brussels, 1981.
Daniels, P.W., "An Exploratory Study of Office Location Behavior in Greater
Seattle", Urban Geography,no. 3,1982, pps. 58-77.
Daniels, P.W., Service Industries: A Geographical Appraisal, Methenen,
London, 1985.
Gershuny, J.I.,After Industrial Society? The Emerging Self-Service Economy,
Macmillan, London, 1978.
Gershuny, J.I. and I.D. Miles, The New Service Economy, Frances Pinter,
London, 1983.
Hansen, Niles, "Regional Consequences of Structural Changes in the National
and International Division of Labor", International Regional Science Review ,
Vol. 11, no. 2 (1988), pps. 121-36.
Israilevich, Phillip, and William A. Testa, "The Geography of Value Added",
Economic Perspectives, September/Oct. 1989.

Lee, R. and D. North "The spatial consequences of takeovers in some British
industries and their implications for regional development", in F.E.I. Hamilton
ed. Contemporary Industrialization: Spatial Analysis and Regional
Development,London, Longman, 1978 pps. 158-81.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




20

Little, Jane Sneddon, "Exchange Rates and Structural Change in U.S.
Manufacturing Employment, New England Economic Review, March/April
1989, pps. 56-70.
Marshall, J.N., "Linkages Between Manufacturing Industry and Business
Services",Environmental Planning A , 14,1982, pps. 1523-40.
Marshall, J.N. "Corporate Reorganization and the Geography of Services:
Evidence from the Motor Vehicle Aftermarket in the West Midlands Region
of the U.K.", Regional Studies, vol. 23, no. 2,1989, pps 139-50.
Polese, M., "Regional Demand for Business Services and Inter-regional
Service Flows in a Small Canadian Region", Papers o f the Regional Science
Association, vol. 50,1982, pps. 313-331.
Noyelle, Thierry J., "The Rise of Advanced Services; Some Implications for
Economic Development in U.S. Cities", American Planning Association
Journal, Summer 1983, pps. 280-90.
Rajan, A., and Pearson, R., U K Occupation and Employment: Trends to 1990,
Butterworth, London, 1986.
Reifler, Roger F., "Implications of Service Industry Growth for Regional
Development Strategies", Annals o f Regional Science, July, 1976, vol. X, pps.
88-104.
Smith, IJ., "The effect of external takeovers on manufacturing employment
change in the Northern Region 1963-73", Regional Studies, vol. 13, pps. 421437.
Scott, A. J. Industrialization and Urbanization: A geographical agenda.
Annals o f the Association o f American Geographers vol. 76, no. 1, 1986, pps.

25-37.
Scott, A. J. Industrial organization and location: Division of labor, the firm,
and spatial process. Economic Geography vol. 62, no. 3,1986, pps. 215-31.
Sneddon Little, Jane, "A Low Dollar Couldn't Fix Harm a High Dollar Did",
Wall Street Journal, July 11,1989, p. 14.
Stanback, T.M., and Noyelle, T.J., Cities in Transition: Changing Job
Structures in Atlanta, Denver, Buffalo, Phoenix, Columbus, Nashville, and
Charlotte, Allanheld, Osmun Totowa, NJ., 1982.
Stoiper, M. and S. Christopherson, "Flexible specialization and regional
industrial agglomerations: The case of the U.S. motion picture industry”
Annals o f the Association o f Geographers, vol. 77, no. 1,1987 pps. 104-17.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, WP-1989-21




21

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Input-Output
Tables o f the United States, 1963.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Input-Output
Tables o f the United States, 1983.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey o f
Current Business, (various issues).
U.S. Department of Commerce, County Business Patterns, (data tape).
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census
Manufactures and Annual Survey o f Manufactures (various issues).

of

Wood. P.A., "Anatomy of Job Loss and Fob Creation: Some speculations on
the role of the 'Producer Service Sector", Regional Studies, 1985.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




22

A p p e n d ix I

Business Services Concentration by State
States in the Great Lakes region vary widely in their propensity to host
business service activities. Accordingly, the following disaggregated tables
are offered as evidence to this effect (and for the general interest and use by
analysts and planners working at the state rather than at the regional level).

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




23

Appendix l-a
Auxiliary payroll as a percent of total payroll (In manufacturing)
Illinois

Indiana

Michigan

Minnesota

1958

5.8

1.7

10.5

6.8

1963

7.1

2.3

11.6

8.3

1967

6.9

1.8

11.4

10.7

1972

8.6

2.5

12.7

12.1

1977

10.7

2.9

13.1

15.0

1982

16.0

3.1

17.5

16.9

1986

15.0

3.6

15.1

19.5

Ohio

Wisconsin

Great Lakes

United States

1958

4.5

3.1

5.8

5.7

1963

5.8

4.2

7.0

6.6

1967

5.9

4.6

7.1

6.6

1972

7.9

4.3

8.4

7.9

1977

7.9

5.7

9.4

8.3

1982

12.4

8.2

13.0

10.1

1986

12.2

8.6

12.7

10.7

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,

Manufactures.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1 9 8 9 ,W P-1989-21




Census ofManufacturesand Annual Surveyof

24

Appendix l-b
Employment concentration of Great Lakes States
in business service lndustries-1976 and 1986
Illinois

rndiana

Michigan

Ohio

Minnesota Wisconsin

197a 1986 1976 1986 1976 1986 1976 1986 t976 1986 1976 1986
Manufacturing auxiliaries

1.51 1.58

.56

.50

1.27 1.68

1.74 1.89

Other industry auxiliaries

1.11 1.15

.78

.75

2.20 2.36
.69

.65

.89 1.00

1.01 1.28

Motor freight-transport and warehousing

1.05 1.01

1.16 1.33

.86

.92

1.17 1.10

1.13 1.02

.80 1.16
.43

.59

1.09 1.26

.35

.36

.23

.11

.15

.32

.57

Transportation by air

1.18 1.35

.17

.24

.35

.38

.28

.33

Transportation services

1.31 1.27

.36

.41

.69

.74

.49

.61

.81

.93

.46

j61

.79

.78

.76

.79

.88

.75

.80

.74

.71

.73
.84

Water transportation

Communications

.23

.82

.82

.13

.15

.22

1.41 1.78

.26

.17

.30

Wholesale trade-durable goods

1.09 1.15

.90

.89

.85

.92

.98 1.01

1.13 1.05

.85

Wholesale trade-nondurable

1.00 1.06

.85

.87

.64

.74

.76

.98

1.14 1.07

.92

.97

Depository institutions

1.01 1.09

.82

.81

.85

.82

.83

.81

.83

.84

Securities and commodities brokers

1.32 1.54

.24

.28

.42

.44

.45

.46

.49

.53

Insurance

1.21 .134

.88

.96

.85

.80

.80

.93

.83

.54

.65

.58

.73

.77

.89

.85

.66

1.09 1.19

.37

.41

.27

.34

1.04

.76

.75

.58

.78

.99

.83

.84

.91

.96

.68

.69

Real estate

.98

.89

Real estate and combined

.98

.86

Business services

1.09 1.06

.51

.65

.87

.95

.82

.86

1.01 1.10

.99 1.15
.52

Advertising

1.74 1.64

.43

.64

.95 1.05

.75

.76

.97 1.12

.71

.70

Mailing, reproduction, art and photo

1.76 1.64

.31

.59

.94 1.55

.75

.75

.80 1.00

.68

.89
.76

Services to buildings

.88

.86

.58

.67

.65

.69

.84

.94

.76

.92

.65

Computer and related services

.79 1.25

.32

.46

.77 1.40

.54

.71

1.60

.90

.63

.51

Research and development labs

1.79 1.08

.09

.16

.22

.83

1.35

.77

.19

.22

.15

.22

Management and public relations

1.15 1.14

.46

.80

.71

.80

.88

.90

74

.91

.50

.49

.95 1.07

.58

.54

.81

.82

.74

.72

.92

.92

.86

.76

Legal services

.94

.97

Engineering and architectural

.96

.78

.48

.49

.92

.93

.68

.68

.82

.76

.58

.50

Noncommercial research organizations

.26

.32

.29

.26

.59

.54

.68

.25

.49

.49

.43

.13

Accounting, auditing, bookkeeping

1.13 1.00

.65

.69

.96

.85

.84

.89

.99 1.14

.85

.85

Total (all above services)

1.08 1.11

.77

.77

.88

.90

.87

.92

1.06 1.07

.79

.84

Membership organizations

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




1.15 1.08

1.03 1.12

1.00 1.06

1.33 1.30

1.12 1.28

CountyBusiness Patterns.

25

A p p e n d ix I I

Nonproduction Occupations in Manufacturing
Further evidence on the service orientation of Great Lakes manufacturing can
be gleaned from data covering employment by occupation within the
manufacturing sector. In the last section of the preceding paper, employment
at auxiliary establishments (i.e. service-only establishments of manufacturing
companies) are examined to illustrate the Great Lakes trend of rising service
orientation. However, service functions in manufacturing occur at all
manufacturing establishments, including production plants and not only at
auxiliaries such as R & D and corporate headquarters establishments. In fact,
activities such as strategic planning, advertising, R&D, warehousing, and the
like can be found at manufacturing establishments which are classified as
operating plants. Accordingly, a look at occupational data covering all
establishments can bear further evidence on the rising service orientation of
manufacturing companies.
A word of caution concerning the occupational data reported herein.
Occupational data, which is gathered by the decenial Census of Population, is
self-reported. Census respondents identify their own industry of employment
and their own occupation. Aside from a possible high degree of error in
identifying industry, there may be differences in the professions that people
identify from region to region, even for identical occupational activities.
For 1980, the data show that, unlike the auxiliary data reported earlier, the
Great Lakes region displays a slightly lower intensity of service occupations
relative to the nation. This holds for professional and specialty occupations in
manufacturing including scientists and engineers, and executive and
administrative positions. Some occupations, including service and transport
and material handling occupations are more concentrated than the nation.
These tendencies display a wide variation across Great Lakes states. Illinois
and Minnesota report a higher-than-national share of service occupations in
manufacturing. Michigan's high concentration of scientists and engineers is
also notable.
Over time, specifically from 1970 to 1980, the Great Lakes orientation toward
service activity in manufacturing has risen, albeit very modestly. At the same
time, intra-region specialization has widened with Illinois, Michigan, and

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




26

Minnesota all increasing their service intensity relative to the nation;
Wisconsin decreasing its service orientation; and Ohio and Indiana remaining
much the same.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 19891 W P -1989-21




27

Appendix ll-a
Service-oriented occupational activities within Great Lakes
manufacturing industries-1980

Great Lakes
employees

Great Lakes
share of total
manufacturing
employment
(-p ercen t-)

Concentration
index:
Great Lakes
relative to U.S.
manufacturers

756,533

13.7

.94

Executive, administrative and managerial

457,036

8.3

.95

Professional specialty occupations

299,497

5.4

.92

178,174

3.2

.98

21,769

.4

.87

Managerial and professional occupations

-engineers, architects, and surveyors
-computer system s analysts and scientists,
operations system s and mathematical scientists
-natural scientists
Technical, sales, and administrative support

18,975

.3

.93

1,013,512

18.3

.97
.92

Technical and related support

160,426

2.9

S ale s occupations

156,683

2.8

.90

Administrative support, including clerical

696,403

12.6

1.00

Service occupations

139,566

2.5

1.12

Transportation and material moving occupations

248,777

4.5

1.08

2,158,388

39.0

.98

Total service oriented occupations
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P-1989-21




1980Census of Population.

28

Appandlx ll-b
Concentration of employment In nonproduction actIvltieB
In manufacturing industries 1970-1980

Illinois
Indiana

1970

1980

1.06

1.07

.86

.86

.91

.94

1.16

1.19

Ohio

.96

.96

Wisconsin

.94

.93

Great Lakes Region

.97

.98

Michigan
Minnesota

Share of employment In nonproduction activities
In manufacturing industrles-1970-1980
1970

1980
42.4

Illinois

39.9

Indiana

32.2

34.3

Michigan

34.4

37.5

Minnesota

43.7

47.5

Ohio

35.9

38.1

Wisconsin

35.5

36.9

Great Lakes Region

36.5

39.0

U.S.

37.6

39.8

Note; Nonproduction activities include occupations within the managerial and professional; technical,
sales and administrative support; service; and transportation and material moving categories.
Source: U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Census of Population.

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989 , W P-1989-21




29

Appendix ll-c
■Manufacturing employees by occupation-concentration Index relative to U.S. In 1980
IL
Managerial and professional occupations
Executive, administrative and managerial
Professional specialty occupations
-engineers, architects, and surveyors

IN

Ml

MN

OH

Wl

1.04

.73

.95

1.29

.91

.84

1.t3

.71

.87

1.34

.91

.90

.91

.76

1.06

1.21

.90

.74

.88

.86

1.22

1.16

.98

.76

.84

.61

1.06

1.67

.77

.59

-computer system s analysts and scientists,
operations system s and mathematical scientists
-natural scientists
Technical, sales, and administrative support

1.03

.96

.88

1.04

1.01

.55

1.11

.84

.87

1.23

.95

.93
.86

.85

.80

.89

1.59

.91

S ale s occupations

1.13

.69

.77

1.21

.85

.85

Administrative support, including clerical

1.17

.89

.89

1.14

.98

.97

1.09

1.19

1.23

.97

1.08

1.08

.96

1.26

1.12

.83

1.12

1.13

1.07

.86

.94

1,19

.96

.93

Technical and related support

Service occupations
Transportation and material moving occupations
Total service oriented occupations
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,

F R B C H IC A G O W orking P a p e r
O ctober 1989, W P -1 9 8 9 -2 I




1980Census ofPopulation.

30

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
R E S E A R C H STAFF M E M O R A N D A , W O R K I N G P A P E R S A N D STAFF STUDIES
The following lists papers developed in recent years by the Bank’s research staff. Copies of those
materials that are currently available can be obtained by contacting the Public Information Center
(312) 322-5111.

Working Paper Series— A series of research studies on regional economic issues relating to the Sev­
enth Federal Reserve District, and on financial and economic topics.

Regional Economic Issues

•WP-82-1

Donna Craig Vandenbrink

“The Effects of Usury Ceilings:
the Economic Evidence,” 1982

David R. Allardice

“Small Issue Industrial Revenue Bond
Financing in the Seventh Federal
Reserve District,” 1982

WP-83-1

William A. Testa

“Natural Gas Policy and the Midwest
Region,” 1983

WP-86-1

Diane F. Siegel
William A. Testa

“Taxation of Public Utilities Sales:
State Practices and the Illinois Experience”

WP-87-1

AJenka S. Giese
William A. Testa

“Measuring Regional High Tech
Activity with Occupational Data”

WP-87-2

Robert H. Schnorbus
Philip R. Israilevich

“Alternative Approaches to Analysis of
Total Factor Productivity at the
Plant Level”

WP-87-3

Alenka S. Giese
William A. Testa

“Industrial R & D An Analysis of the
Chicago Area”

WP-89-1

William A. Testa

“Metro Area Growth from 1976 to 1985:
Theory and Evidence”

WP-89-2

William A. Testa
Natalie A. Davila

“Unemployment Insurance: A State
Economic Development Perspective”

WP-89-3

Alenka S. Giese

“A Window of Opportunity Opens for
Regional Economic Analysis: B E A Release
Gross State Product Data”

WP-89-4

Philip R. Israilevich
William A. Testa

“Determining Manufacturing Output
for States and Regions”

WP-89-5

Alenka S.Geise

“The Opening of Midwest Manufacturing
to Foreign Companies: The Influx of
Foreign Direct Investment”

WP-89-6

Alenka S. Giese
Robert H. Schnorbus

“A New Approach to Regional Capital Stock
Estimation: Measurement and
Performance”

••WP-82-2

"Limited quantity available.
••Out of print.




2
Working Paper Series (confd)
WP-89-7

William A. Testa

“Why has Illinois Manufacturing Fallen
Behind the Region?”

WP-89-8

Alenka S. Giese
William A. Testa

“Regional Specialization and Technology
in Manufacturing”

WP-89-9

Christopher Erceg
Philip R. Israilevich
Robert H. Schnorbus

“Theory and Evidence of Two Competitive
Price Mechanisms for Steel”

WP-89-10

David R. Allardice
William A. Testa

“Regional Energy Costs and Business
Siting Decisions: An Illinois Perspective”

WP-89-21

William A. Testa

“Manufacturing’s Changeover to Services
in the Great Lakes Economy”

Issues in Financial Regulation
WP-89-11

Douglas D. EvanofT
Philip R. Israilevich
Randall C. Merris

“Technical Change, Regulation, and Economies
of Scale for Large Commercial Banks:
An Application of a Modified Version
of Shepard’s Lemma”

WP-89-12

Douglas D. EvanofT

“Reserve Account Management Behavior:
Impact of the Reserve Accounting Scheme
and Carry Forward Provision”

WP-89-14

George G. Kaufman

“Are Some Banks too Large to Fail?
Myth and Reality”

WP-89-16

Ramon P. De Gennaro
James T. Moser

“Variability and Stationarity of Term
Premia”

WP-89-17

Thomas Mondschean

“A Model of Borrowing and Lending
with Fixed and Variable Interest Rates”

WP-89-18

Charles W. Calomiris

“Do 'Vulnerable" Economies Need Deposit
Insurance?: Lessons from the U.S.
Agricultural Boom and Bust of the 1920s”

Macro Economic Issues
WP-89-13

David A. Aschauer

“Back of the G-7 Pack: Public Investment and
Productivity Growth in the Group of Seven”

WP-89-15

Kenneth N. Kuttner

“Monetary and Non-Monetary Sources
of Inflation: An Error Correction Analysis”

WP-89-19

Ellen R. Rissman

“Trade Policy and Union Wage Dynamics”

•Lim ited quantity available.
••Out of print.




Working Paper Series (cont'd)
WP-89-20

Bruce C. Petersen
William A. Strauss

“Investment Cyclicality in Manufacturing
Industries”

WP-89-22

Prakash Loungani
Richard Rogerson
Yang-Hoon Sonn

“Labor Mobility, Unemployment and
Sectoral Shifts: Evidence from
Micro Data”

'Lim ited quantity available.
"O u t of print.




4
Staff Memoranda— A series of research papers in draft form prepared by members of the Research
Department and distributed to the academic community for review and comment. (Series discon­
tinued in December, 1988. Later works appear in working paper series).
•♦SM-81-2

George G. Kaufman

“Impact of Deregulation on the Mortgage
Market,” 1981

••SM-81-3

Alan K. Reichert

“An Examination of the Conceptual Issues
Involved in Developing Credit Scoring Models
in the Consumer Lending Field,” 1981

Robert D. Laurent

“A Critique of the Federal Reserve’s New
Operating Procedure,” 1981

George G. Kaufman

“Banking as a Line of Commerce: The Changing
Competitive Environment,” 1981

SM-82-1

Harvey Rosenblum

“Deposit Strategies of Minimizing the Interest
Rate Risk Exposure of S&Ls,” 1982

•SM-82-2

George Kaufman
Larry Mote
Harvey Rosenblum

“Implications of Deregulation for Product
Lines and Geographical Markets of Financial
Instititions,” 1982

•SM-82-3

George G. Kaufman

“The Fed’s Post-October 1979 Technical
Operating Procedures: Reduced Ability
to Control Money,” 1982

SM-83-1

John J. Di Clemente

“The Meeting of Passion and Intellect:
A History of the term ‘Bank’in the
Bank Holding Company Act,” 1983

SM-83-2

Robert D. Laurent

“Comparing Alternative Replacements for
Lagged Reserves: Why Settle for a Poor
Third Best?” 1983

•♦SM-83-3

G. O. Bierwag
George G. Kaufman

“A Proposal for Federal Deposit Insurance
with Risk Sensitive Premiums,” 1983

♦SM-83-4

Henry N. Goldstein
Stephen E. Haynes

“A Critical Appraisal of McKinnon’s
World Money Supply Hypothesis,” 1983

SM-83-5

George Kaufman
Larry Mote
Harvey Rosenblum

“The Future of Commercial Banks in the
Financial Services Industry,” 1983

SM-83-6

Vefa Tarhan

“Bank Reserve Adjustment Process and the
Use of Reserve Carryover Provision and
the Implications of die Proposed
Accounting Regime,” 1983

SM-83-7

John J. Di Clemente

“The Inclusion of Thrifts in Bank
Merger Analysis,” 1983

SM-84-1

Harvey Rosenblum
Christine Pavel

“Financial Services in Transition: The
Effects of Nonbank Competitors,” 1984

SM-81-4
•♦SM-81-5

♦Limited quantity available.
**Out of print.




Staff Memoranda (coni'd)

SM-84-2

George G. Kaufman

“The Securities Activities of Commercial
Banks,” 1984

SM-84-3

George G. Kaufman
Larry Mote
Harvey Rosenblum

“Consequences of Deregulation for
Commercial Banking”

SM-84-4

George G. Kaufman

“The Role of Traditional Mortgage Lenders
in Future Mortgage Lending: Problems
and Prospects”

SM-84-5

Robert D. Laurent

“The Problems of Monetary Control Under
Quasi-Contemporaneous Reserves”

SM-85-1

Harvey Rosenblum
M. Kathleen O ’Brien
John J. Di Clemente

“On Banks, Nonbanks, and Overlapping
Markets: A Reassessment of Commercial
Banking as a Line of Commerce”

SM-85-2

Thomas G. Fischer
William H. Gram
George G. Kaufman
Larry R. Mote

“The Securities Activities of Commercial
Banks: A Legal and Economic Analysis”

SM-85-3

George G. Kaufman

“Implications of Large Bank Problems and
Insolvencies for the Banking System and
Economic Policy”

SM-85-4

Elijah Brewer, III

“The Impact of Deregulation on The True
Cost of Savings Deposits: Evidence
From Illinois and Wisconsin Savings &
Loan Association”

SM-85-5

Christine Pavel
Harvey Rosenblum

“Financial Darwinism: Nonbanks—
and Banks— Are Surviving”

SM-85-6

G. D. Koppenhaver

“Variable-Rate Loan Commitments,
Deposit Withdrawal Risk, and
Anticipatory Hedging”

SM-85-7

G. D. Koppenhaver

“A Note on Managing Deposit Flows
With Cash and Futures Market
Decisions”

SM-85-8

G. D. Koppenhaver

“Regulating Financial Intermediary
Use of Futures and Option Contracts:
Policies and Issues”

SM-85-9

Douglas D. EvanofT

“The Impact of Branch Banking
on Service Accessibility”

SM-86-1

George J. Benston
George G. Kaufman

“Risks and Failures in Banking:
Overview, History, and Evaluation”

SM-86-2

David Alan Aschauer

“The Equilibrium Approach to Fiscal
Policy”

♦Limited quantity available.
♦♦Out of print.




6

Staff Memoranda (cont’d)

SM-86-3

George G. Kaufman

“Banking Risk in Historical Perspective”

SM-86-4

Elijah Brewer III
Cheng Few Lee

“The Impact of Market, Industry, and
Interest Rate Risks on Bank Stock Returns”

SM-87-1

Ellen R. Rissman

“Wage Growth and Sectoral Shifts:
New Evidence on the Stability of
the Phillips Curve”

SM-87-2

Randall C. Merris

“Testing Stock-Adjustment Specifications
and Other Restrictions on Money
Demand Equations”

SM-87-3

George G. Kaufman

“The Truth About Bank Runs”

SM-87-4

Gary D. Koppenhaver
Roger Stover

“On The Relationship Between Standby
Letters of Credit and Bank Capital”

SM-87-5

Gary D. Koppenhaver
Cheng F. Lee

“Alternative Instruments for Hedging
Inflation Risk in the Banking Industry”

SM-87-6

Gary D. Koppenhaver

“The Effects of Regulation on Bank
Participation in the Market”

SM-87-7

Vefa Tarhan

“Bank Stock Valuation: Does
Maturity Gap Matter?”

SM-87-8

David Alan Aschauer

“Finite Horizons, Intertemporal
Substitution and Fiscal Policy”

SM-87-9

Douglas D. Evanoff
Diana L. Fortier

“Reevaluation of the Structure-ConductPerformance Paradigm in Banking”

SM-87-10

David Alan Aschauer

“Net Private Investment and Public Expenditure
in the United States 1953-1984”

SM-88-1

George G. Kaufman

“Risk and Solvency Regulation of
Depository Institutions: Past Policies
and Current Options”

SM-88-2

David Aschauer

“Public Spending and the Return to Capital”

SM-88-3

David Aschauer

“Is Government Spending Stimulative?”

SM-88-4

George G. Kaufman
Larry R. Mote

“Securities Activities of Commercial Banks:
The Current Economic and Legal Environment”

SM-88-5

Elijah Brewer, III

“A Note on the Relationship Between
Bank Holding Company Risks and Nonbank
Activity”

SM-88-6

G. O. Bierwag
George G. Kaufman
Cynthia M. Latta

“Duration Models: A Taxonomy”

G. O. Bierwag
George G. Kaufman

“Durations of Nondefault-Free Securities”

•Limited quantity available.
••Out of print.




7
Staff Memoranda (corn'd)

SM-88-7

David Aschauer

“Is Public Expenditure Productive?”

SM-88-8

Elijah Brewer, III
Thomas H. Mondschean

“Commercial Bank Capacity to Pay
Interest on Demand Deposits:
Evidence from Large Weekly
Reporting Banks”

SM-88-9

Abhijit V. Baneijee
Kenneth N. Kuttner

“Imperfect Information and the
Permanent Income Hypothesis”

SM-88-10

David Aschauer

“Does Public Capital Crowd out
Private Capital?”

SM-88-11

Ellen Rissman

“Imports, Trade Policy, and
Union Wage Dynamics”

Staff Studies— A series of research studies dealing with various economic policy issues on a national
level.
SS-83-1
••SS-83-2

Harvey Rosenblum
Diane Siegel

“Competition in Financial Services:
the Impact of Nonbank Entry,” 1983

Gillian Garcia

“Financial Deregulation: Historical
Perspective and Impact of the Garn-St
Germain Depository Institutions Act
of 1982,” 1983

•Lim ited quantity available.
**Out of print.