The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR JA M ES J. D AV IS. Secretary CHILDREN’S BUREAU G R A C E A B B O T T . Chief THE WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON A STUDY OF CHILD LABOR UNDER A MODERN SYSTEM OF LEGAL REGULATION By HELEN SUM NER W O O D B U R Y , Ph. D. Bureau Publication No. 89 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OWING TO LIMITED APPROPRIATIONS FOR PRINTING, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DISTRIBUTE THIS BULLETIN IN LARGE QUANTITIES. ADDITIONAL COPIES MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D . C. AT 25 C E N T S P E R C O P Y https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 3 6 * . 1 A * ? CONTENTS Page. Letter of transmittal.................................................. v Preface .......................................................................... .. Sources of information.............................................. 1 7 13 ;. 70-87 .. 74 75 :. 76 78 .. 79 83 88-103 Obtaining em ploym ent certificates..................... Introductory su m m a ry ........................................... T he children.......... ......................................... ............. S e x ...........................................: .............................. N a tiv ity .................................................... ............ Birthplace.............................................................. Years in the U n ited States............................ Father’s nativity and nationality............... Age at going to work......................................... The fam ilies................................................................... V II F am ily status....................................................... 88 Occupation of father......................................... 93 95 96 99 104-147 .. 104 .. 106 .. 107 .. 114 .. 118 .. 126 .. 144 148-170 .. 148 .. 152 .. 155 .. 156 .. 160 .. 162 . 163 171-224 .. 171 .. 183 . 190 .. 194 Unem ployed fathers............ ............................. E m ployed mothers............................................ Economic need of ch ild ’s work.................... Termination of school life ....................................... Age at leaving school....................................... Schooltime l o s t ............................ ...................... Season and month of going to work'. Reasons for leaving school......................... Grade com pleted................................................ Retardation.................. r . ................................... Continuation-school attendance............ W ork before leaving school.......... ’. ........................ Sex, n ativity, and father’s n a tio n a lity .. A ge at securing first school position.......... K in d of first school position.......................... A m ou n t of work done in school positions Earnings in school positions.......................... Schooltime l o s t .................................................. Grade completed and retardation............... Industrial histories..................................................... Methods of securing positions....................... Num ber of positions................................... U nem ploym en t................................................... Initial w eekly wages........................................ Change in w eekly wages............................... . 200 Average earnings................................................ . 206 . 211 Hours of labor...................................................... .. 216 225-283 . 229 .. 231 .. 243 Reasons for leaving positions........................ Occupations..................................................... ............. S e x ............................................................................ N a tiv ity and father’s nationality................ Age at taking out first certificate................ ni https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis IV CONTENTS. Occupations— Continued. Page. Grade completed and retardation.................................................................................... 245 Vacation and regular Workers............................................................................................ 250 Methods of securing positions........................................................................................... 254 Character of occupations...................................................................................................... 257 Occupational shift........................................ 258 T im e worked................................................... . . . ............... - ...........- ................... ................. 261 Hours of labor..... .............................................................................................................. - - - 266 Piece and tim e work...................... 270 Initial w eekly wages........................................................................................... •- - - ------- 273 Change in w eekly w ages................................ ...................................- ............................... 277 Reasons for leaving positions....................... 280 Sickness and accidents.................. ........ .......................... ....................................................... 284-290 Sickness.............................. ...................................................................................â j ............. 287 A ccidents.......................................................................... ........................ I .......... - - - ~........... 289 Enforcement of the child-labor law ........................................ .. - ............................. ........ 291-331 E vidence of age............................ ........................................................................................ - 295 Violations in school positions.............................. ............................................................. Violations in regular positions.......................... ................. ............................ ................. 297 303 Certification and nativity and father’s nationality.................................................. 306 Certification and the school........................................................................................... - - 311 Certification and work before leaving school.......................... ................................... 315 Certification and m ethod of securing p osition s......................................................... 316 Certification and occupation.......... ........................................ ' - - .................................... 318 Hour violations........................................ ............................ - ................................................ 322* Occupations, hours, and wages three years later......................... ............................ .. - 332-355 Occupations...................................... - . ................................... ........................- ...................... 333 H om s of labor...............................................................- ......................................................... *^42 W eek ly wages...............................................................— - ......... ....................................... Increase in w eekly wages................................................................ ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345 352 Appendixes..................................................................- ................................................................ 357-365 A pp en dix I . T ables.......................................................... - ...........- ................. ............... 359-361 Table. I .— Occupation, b y sex; comparison of positions held b y chil dren interviewed w ith those held b y children in Boston continuation school and b y children issuêd certificates in four cities........................... 359 Table I I .— Occupation first entered, country of birth, and sex; children issued certificates in four c it ie s ......................................................................... 360 Table I I I .— Duration of first regular position, b y termination, and b y sex of child; children interview ed.'................................................................. 361 A ppendix I I .— Methods of classification used in tabulation......................... 362-363 Diagram showing scale used in determining retardation............................ 362 Occupation classification used in tabulation...................................................... 362 Appendix I I I .— Special s tu d ie s . ..................................................................... 364-365 Special hom e perm its................................................................................................ .. Case studies........................................................................- ...............................follow https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 364 365 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. U nited States D epartment of L abor , Children ’ s B ureau , Washington, May 31, 1921. S ir : I transmit herewith a study of the employment of children under 16 years of age in Boston, Mass., which is designed to show the conditions under which these young workers are employed in a typical city of diversified industries and a considerable volume of trade where their labor is regulated by advanced modern legislation. The material for this report was secured under the direction of Mrs. Helen Sumner Woodbury, who has written the report. The statistical treatment of the material was planned by Dr. Robert M. Woodbury. The appendixes dealing with individual cases of child workers and with special home permits were prepared by Miss Ella Arvilla Merritt. Respectfully submitted. Julia C. L athrop, Chief. Hon. James J. D avis , Secretary o f Labor. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PREFACE. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the amount, character, conditions, and effects of employment of children under 16 years of age in an American city of diversified industries and a considerable volume of trade, and in a State having comparatively advanced child-labor legislation. The problems of child labor, it was believed, ate not confined to backward communities or to backward industries but arise wherever the work of undeveloped young persons is used primarily for profit instead of primarily for straining. Conditions under which children work to-day in a city like Boston differ widely from those under which they worked in England, when, in 1819, the first factory act forbade their employment under 9 years of age and limited the horns of those between 9 and 16 to 12 a day— an act which, by the way, was never enforced. Nevertheless, for the child laborers of the United States at the present time, as for those of England when Lord Shaftesbury began his agitation in their behalf, the questions to be asked are: (1) Is the child worker able to grow into adult life with his health and physical vigor unimpaired ? (2) Does he receive training adapted to make him, when an adult, an efficient workman ? (3) Does he receive an education adequate to make him a good citizen ? In the days before the English factory acts these questions were all answered definitely in the negative. More recently they have been answered in the negative by many studies of the labor of chil dren in this country, from the early Massachusetts inquiries to those which led to the 19-volume report on Condition of Woman and Child Wage Earners.1 But each year legislation regulating child labor has tended to become more voluminous; child labor codes have been enacted and uniform child-labor laws have been proposed and passed, in part at least, by a considerable number of States. The public conscience has approved a 14-year minimum age and the requirement, of employment certificates until 16 years of age, with compulsory school attendance up to 14 and between 14 and 16 if a child is not employed. Nevertheless, until the questions asked above can be answered absolutely in the affirmative it is impossible to settle back in the complacent belief that the child-labor problem has been solved. Under each more advanced form of regulation, therefore, 1 Condition of W om an and Child W age Earners in the United States. U . S. Bureau of Labor. VII https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1910-1913. V III PREFACE. these questions as to the effects of child labor on health, industrial^ efficiency, and good citizenship must be raised anew. A study which would furnish the evidence necessary for definitely affirmative answers to these three questions would involve a thorough inquiry into the lives of a large number of young persons who had been child laborers. The present study does not pretend either to the breadth or to the depth necessary to furnish such answers. But in the past the gathering together of the more easily ascertainable facts has sufficed to furnish negative answers. Information on a special phase of the subject which may be inconclusive or which may even seem to point toward an affirmative answer usually indicates also that further study of that phase is needed. - It is hoped, therefore, that this study, even though it does not involve so thorough an inquiry into the physical and mental effects of employment at an early age as would be desirable, may contribute information which will assist in forming a judgment as to the sufficiency of the more advanced types of child-labor legislation. Boston was chosen for the study because, in addition to having industrial conditions fairly typical of those in other large American cities, it had legal regulations of child labor as stringent as any which are common in this country, a good system of records of its working ■" children, and, in its continuation school, the beginnings, at least, of an attempt to apply the most modern methods to the problems of the child in industry. At the time of this study, however, the continua tion school was new and its methods were frankly experimental. Therefore, although the records of this school were used and formed a valuable source of information in regard to its pupils, no attempt was made to study either its methods or their results. The one possible objection to the selection of Boston was that the city proper is not a complete industrial unit. The bridges and tunnels connecting Boston with the neighboring cities to the north and north east— Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea— have served to link the four cities together industrially as they are not linked politically. In order to make as intensive a study as seemed desirable it was neces sary, however, to select a smaller number of children than were at work in all four of these cities. It was therefore determined to secure and tabulate all the information in the employment-certificate records of the four cities, but to confine the intensive study to the children enrolled in the Boston continuation school— all of whom had taken out certificates for work in Boston, although some of them lived in the_ suburbs. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis THE WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. SOURCES OF INFORMATION. The four chief sources of information in regard to these child workers were: (1) The employment-certificate records of Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea. (2) The Boston continuation-school records. (3) Schedules taken in interviews by agents of the bureau with a group of children attending the Boston continuation school. (4) Replies to a questionnaire sent out in December, 1918, to the children who had been interviewed. The child-labor law, which became effective in Massachusetts in September, 1913, required that no child between 14 and 16 years of nage should be employed or “ permitted to work in, about, or in con nection with any factory, workshop, manufacturing, mechanical, or mercantile establishment” without having secured an employment certificate.1 If any machinery whatever was used, the establish ment was either a factory or a mechanical establishment. The term “ workshop” covered many other places, and a “ mercantile estab lishment” was defined as any place where merchandise or goods were sold, including restaurants and hotels.2 The employment of a child under 14 was prohibited not only in any one of these establishments, but also in any— barber shop, bootblack stand or establishment, public stable, garage, brick or lumber yard, telephone exchange, telegraph or messenger office, or in the construction or repair of buildings, or in any contract or wage-earning industry carried on in tenement or other houses.3 • So far as employment during school hours is concerned, the require ment of an employment certificate for children between 14 and 16 years of age was at the time of this study even more far reaching than the prohibition of employment under 14, for the compulsory-education law provided that children under 16 should not remain out of school unless they had such certificates and were regularly employed at least six hours a day, or unless they had the written permission of the 1 Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 57, as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 15. 2 Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 17, as amended b y acts of 1912, ch. 191. 3 Acts of 1913, ch. 831, sec. 1, amending acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 56. 1 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. superintendent of schools “ to engage in profitable employment at home.” 4 This written permission was in the form of a “ special home permit,” and the holder of such a permit was expected to show, not only before securing it, but also at intervals therèafter, that he or she was actually remaining at home to assist his or her parents and was not employed in any of the industries for which an employment certificate was required. This “ special home permit” was similar in general form to an employment certificate. The law, it is evident, provided adequate guaranties against the gainful employment during school hours of children under 16 years of age who had not procured employment certificates; and the posi tions in which their employment outside school hours was permitted without certificates were limited in number and difficult to secure, with one single exception specifically made in the law itself. For the law provided that children under 16 years of age employed in mer cantile establishments from 7 a. m. to 6 p. m. on Saturdays only were not obliged to have certificates.5 Employment certificates were issued by local school authorities, were made out to the individual employer, and had to be returned to the issuing office within two days after the child had left the position or had been discharged.6 When the child found a new position, therefore, he had to come back for another certificate for the new employer. Each certificate was made out in duplicate and the carbon copy was kept at the issuing office. This law went into effect on September 1, 1913, and under it all children employed in the State were obliged to obtain new certificates, even those who already held employment certificates issued under the former law. Since that date, therefore, a certain amount of in formation, not only in regard to children going to work, but also in regard to their industrial careers after they went to work, has been available in offices of the local school authorities in all Massa chusetts towns and cities. The probability that these records were complete up to the child’s sixteenth year was increased, moreover, by the provision requiring children from 16 to 21, as well as those from 14 to 16, to have certifi cates. The older children were required to have educational certifi cates, which were of two kinds, orange colored, or “ gold,” certificates for those who could read and write the English language, and gray certificates for illiterates— that is, for young persons who were unable to pass a fourth-grade educational test and who were therefore obliged, in all places where evening schools had been established, to attend a public day or evening school. Massachusetts is the only * Revised Laws 1902, ch. 44, see. 1, as amended b y acts of 1913, eh. 779, sec. 1, and b y acts of 1915 eh. 81, sec. 1. 6 Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 57, as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 15. « Acts of 1909, ch. 514, secs. 57 and 60, both as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SOURCES OF INFORMATION. 3 State in the Union which attempts to exercise any direct supervision over all working minors regardless of age.7 When this study was made, therefore, it was possible to secure a certain minimum amount of information in regard to all working children in the four cities— Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea— which seemed together to constitute an urban industrial unit. In order to obtain a representative group of children going to work between 14 and 16 years of age, it was decided to obtain the records of all children who became 14 at any time during the year which ended on September 1, 1914, and who went to work before September 1, 1916. These children, therefore, could not have held certificates before the new law went into effect. At the same time they were all 16 years of age or over by September 1, 1916, and it was possible at that time to secure their complete industrial histories, in the meager outlines furnished by the employment certificate records, from the dates on which they first went to work to their sixteenth birthdays. Accordingly, complete employment certificate records were secured and tabulated for all children who became 14 during the year ended September 1, 1914— that is, of all children born between September 4 , 1899, and August 31, 1900— and who went to work at any time before their sixteenth birthdays in any one of the four cities— Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea. These children, of whom there were 5,692, are believed to be in all respects typical of the children going to work in this urban industrial area. The facts secured cover sex, age at going to work, evidence of age produced, birth place, grade completed, and the occupation in each position for which a certificate was secured. More details, however, are given in the records of the Boston con tinuation school than in those of the certificate office, and these records were accordingly used to supplement the certificate data for as many children as possible. Unfortunately, continuation-school attendance was compulsory, at the time of this study, only in Bos ton,8 and even there, during the early part of the period, it was a new i Acts of 1909, eh. 514, sec. 66, as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 23. The section of the law relating to educational certificates for children from 16 to 21, though it did not exempt children employed in m er-. cantile establishments on Saturdays, was not as broad in its application as the section relating to employ m ent certificates. This was in part because, though the list of establishments was the same, the words “ permitted to work in, about, or in connection with ” were omitted, and in part because, as these children were not required to attend any school whatever unless they were illiterate, and then only an evening school, the provisions of the educational certificate section were not reinforced b y the compulsory-education law. The certificate system for children from 16 to 21 did not, in fact, cover all occupations, nor did it cover 'Children who might be remaining at home. According to rulings of the State board of labor and industries, educational certificates were not required in the following establishments: Banks, express companies, insurance companies, telegraph and telephone messenger companies, bowling alleys, bootblack stands, pool rooms, and regular fire-department stations. Helpers on peddlers’ wagons and laborers with pick and shovel were also exem pt. » A law enacted in 1919 makes the establishment of continuation schools compulsory in all cities or towns in which 200 or more minors are regularly employed b y authority of employment certificates or have permits. Acts of 1919, ch. 311, sec. 1. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 4 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. requirement. As a result, none of the Cambridge, Somerville or Chel sea children was included in the continuation-school records, and not all the 4,401 Boston children. One reason for the omission of Boston children was that enrollment in the continuation school was not begun until January, 1914,' and before that date 88 children who belonged in the selected group had escaped registration. A much larger number for whom continuation-school records could not be found, 589 in all, were children who had worked only during vacations; and 57 others were not enrolled because they were nearly 16 years of age when they took out their certificates. Although attendance at continuation school was compulsory for all employed children under 16 years of age, the school facilities were for some time inadequate, and therefore those children who were nearly 16, and so would be able to leave the school before they had derived much benefit from at tendance, were not enrolled. Continuation-school records, on the other hand, were found for 268 children who, according to the dates of beginning and leaving positions, never actually worked during school term and who, therefore, were presumably vacation workers. But as no such records had been taken for the other 589 vacation workers, these 268 children were excluded from the continuationschool series of tables. These tables represent,, therefore,- as nearly as the data available permit, conditions among children who had actually left school to go to work.9 In spite of these omissions, continuation-school records were used for 3,399 of the 4,401 Boston children for whom employment certifi cate records had been secured. The eliminations mentioned in the preceding paragraph tend to reduce the number of children ap proaching 16 when they first went to work, so that the tables based on the continuation-school records represent a group of children who began their industrial careers at a somewhat younger age than the group included in the certificate record tables. A t the same time, as all the vacation workers were omitted, they represent only children who had actually left school to go to work. In other respects the Boston children included in these tables are believed to be fairly typical of the whole group. The additional facts secured from the continuation-school records related to working status of father and mother, age at leaving school and reason for leaving, method of securing and reason for leaving each position, and years in the United States of foreign-born children. s The certificate series for Boston alone contains 4,401 children and the continuation-school series 3,389. children. The following statement summarizes the reasons for omission of the remaining 1,002 children. Vacation workers for whom no continuation-school records were taken............................................. ..........Vacation workers for whom continuation-school records were taken................................................................ Children who escaped registration before the continuation school was opened............................................ Children who were nearly 16 when they began work, and for whom, therefore, no continuation-school 589 268 88 records were taken......................................................I ................................................................................. - ............... ........ ® Total............................................................................................... ............................................................. - ............... l>m https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SOURCES OE INFORMATION. 5 Not all the information desired could be secured from existing records. Agents of the bureau, therefore, interviewed children in the continuation school and in this way secured much additional in formation in regard to 823 children, nearly all of whom were included in the group for which both certificate and continuation-school records were used. These interviews furnished much more accurate information as to unemployment and as to the time during which each child remained in each different position than did the certificateoffice or continuation-school records. The certificate showed only the date when it was returned by the employer, which was frequently some time after the child had stopped work, and the continuationschool record was not made until the child returned for a new certifi cate. The interviews also furnished information as to the nationality of the parents, unemployment, time out on account of sickness, and the wages, hours, and character of work in each position, including positions held both before and after leaving school for which no certi ficates had been procured. In other words, they gave a fairly com plete picture of the industrial careers of these 823 Boston children up to the date of the interview, but not, as did the certificate and continuation-school records, up to the age of 16. The group of children interviewed, like that of children for whom continuation-school records were secured, consisted . entirely of regular workers. Moreover, it contained an even larger proportion of children who had gone to work before they became 15 than did the group for whom continuation-school records were used. But the sample group of children interviewed was selected practically at ran dom, so that with these two exceptions the 823 children in this spe cial group seem to be fairly representative of the working children of Boston. Nevertheless, in order to detect, so far as possible, any bias in either the larger or the smaller sample— the 3,399 children for whom continuation-school records were used or the 823 who were inter viewed— a series of tables was prepared comparing, in as many respects as appeared to be both possible and desirable, the 4,401 Boston records and the 5,692 certificate records for the' four cities combined with these two sources of information. These compara tive tables assist in checking conclusions derived from both samples. Still another series of tables is based on the 4,401 certificate records for Boston alone and compares the children who worked only during school vacations with those who actually left school to go to work before becoming 16. As has been seen, 857 vacation workers in Boston are included in the tables based on the certifi cate records, but are excluded from those based on the continuationschool records. These vacation workers were for the most part children who held certificates only between June 1 and October https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. 1 or for a few days during the Christmas or Easter vacations; in^ addition, a few children are included who worked only before or after school hours and whose certificates were labeled “ Not dis charged from school. ” A final series of tables was based on answers from 328 children to questionnaires sent out in December, 1918, to the 823 children who were interviewed in the continuation school asking them for information as to their occupations, wages, and hours at that time; that is, three years after the date of the interview and at a time when * war production was little, if any, below its highest level. Of these 823 questionnaires 16 came back without description of the positions the children were holding, 92 were returned by the post office showing that the children could not be located, and 387 were never returned. In addition a special study was made of the child-labor laws of Massachusetts and of their administration in Boston and its neighbor ing cities. This study was similar in character to the studies already published of the administration of employment-certificate laws in Connecticut, New York, Maryland, and Wisconsin.10 But in this report it is connected with statistics as to the number of violations of certain sections of the law, especially those relating to certification and to hours of labor. Although these statistics must necessarily underestimate the number of violations, as they are based on the histories of children who, at the time of the interview, were legally employed on certificates, they are for that reason all the more significant. Two other sources were used for supplementary information, but the groups of children included in these subsidiary studies were not the same as the group which furnished the basis for the main inves tigation— those who became 14 during the year ended September 1, 1914. These sources were as follows: 1. Interviews by agents of the bureau with 118 children who held the “ special home permits” above mentioned, especially to deter mine what use was made of such permits and in how many cases the children holding them were gainfully employed. The results of this study are summarized in the appendix.11 These children all belonged to the same age group as those whose employment-certificate records had been copied. 2. The records of the certificate office in Boston as to employment certificates granted to children under 16 years of age from Septem ber 1, 1914, to August 31, 1918, the four years which represent roughly the period of the World War. Tables showing the princi pal facts available in these records are given in the introductory summary to this report. io Children's Bureau Publications Nos. 12,17, 41, and 85. n See Appendix, pp. 364 to 365. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis r OBTAINING EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATES. All the children included in this study were obliged, as already stated, to obtain permission to work, in the form of an employment certificate, from the local school authorities. In Boston these cer tificates were obtained from an office on the second floor of a build ing on Tremont Street near Boylston, close to the heart of the busi ness section. In Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea they were ob tained from the offices of the superintendents of schools of those cities. All these offices were centrally located. In none of the four cities were any printed instructions issued as to how to secure cer tificates. This kind of information is said to spread like wildfire among school children. Nevertheless, many a child had to visit the office more than once before he finally produced the four documents— (1) evidence of his age, (2) a school record, (3) a promise of employ ment signed by an employer or by his authorized representative, and (4) a physician’s certificate of health— which entitled him to his entrance card to the industrial world.12 As for evidence of age,13 if the child did not bring a birth or bap tismal certificate, a transcript of such certificate, or a passport, he was sent away with instructions as to where and how to apply for a birth certificate. In Boston, if a child stated that he had been born in the city, he was sent to the registry department, from which he returned either with a statement of his age or with a statement that his birth was not recorded. If born outside Boston, he had to produce at the office evidence, usually a registry receipt for his let ter, that he had actually attempted to secure a transcript of his birth record. In such a case he was told to go back to school until he had received a reply to his letter or until sufficient time had elapsed for a reply. If no reply was received within a reasonable time, other documentary evidence was accepted, or if he could pro duce no satisfactory documentary evidence, he was required to secure a physician’s certificate of age. This was obtained from the physician appointed by the school committee to give physical exam inations to applicants for certificates. A child born in Boston who could not obtain a birth certificate had to follow the same procedure as to securing other documentary evidence or a physician’s certificate of age. Until the beginning of the World War the procedure was the same for foreign-born as for native children, but the war interrupted or i* 1909, ah. 514, sec. 58, as amended b y 1913, ch. 779, sec. 16. is See pp. 295-297. 7 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 8 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. delayed communications to such, an extent that most foreign-born children could no longer be asked to send abroad for evidence of age. In order to obtain an employment certificate a child was obliged, in the words of the law, to— possess such ability to read, write, and spell in the English language as is required for the completion of the fourth grade of the public schools of the city or town in which he resides.14 Usually he had to bring evidence of such ability in the form of a school record, the contents of which were specified in the law. The law did not require completion of any other fourth-grade study than reading, writing, and spelling in English; superintendents and teachers were not absolutely required to state on the school record the advancement of the child in other subjects, though a blank was providedfor that purpose— and, in fact, they occasionally gave school records to children who had not completed successfully other fourthgrade studies. The law provided that school records should not be issued or accepted unless the child not only possessed these educational qual ifications but also had regularly attended the public schools or other lawfully approved schools for not less than 130 days after becoming 13 years of age.15 But in practice a principal did not refuse a school record merely because the child had not attended his school the requisite number of days, for the child might have attended some other school and hence might be able to produce at the certificate office another record showing enough days’ attendance to make up the shortage. In all such cases, therefore, the responsibility for see ing that the child had attended school the requisite number of days .after his thirteenth birthday rested solely on the certificate-issuing officer. If a child could not prove the requisite number of days’ atten dance, or if for some reason he could not obtain a school record from the principal or teacher of the school last attended, the law permitted the issuing officer to waive this requirement.15 But the child had to produce satisfactory evidence of completion of the English studies of the fourth grade, and, as no literacy test was given in the certificate office, some kind of school document was often accepted as such evidence. For example, if the school last attended was in some other State than Massachusetts, the child was asked to bring a report or promotion card or any other documentary evidence he might have of his attendance and grade standing in that school. If he could pro duce satisfactory evidence that he had completed the fourth grade, 14 Revised Laws, 1902, ch. 44, see. 1, as amended b y Acts of 1913, ch. 779, see,. 1, and by Acts of 1915, ch. 81, sec. 1. Since the period of this study the educational requirement for employment under 16 years o f age in Massachusetts has been raised to completion of the sixth grade. Acts o f 1921, ch. 463. is Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 59, as amended b y Acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec, 17, and b y Acts, of 1914, ch. 580. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OBTAINING EM PLOYM ENT CERTIFICATES. 9 the requirement of a school record in the precise form specified in the law, and with it the requirement of 130 days’ school attendance since the thirteenth birthday, was waived. If he could not produce such evidence, or if the validity of the evidence offered was doubtful, the issuing officer refused to waive the requirement of a school record, and the child was obliged to go back to school. This occurred also when the issuing officer, though the child was able to prove comple tion of the fourth grade, did not believe that the work in the school attended was equivalent to the fourth-grade work required b y law.17 At the time of this study one school in Boston had an “ employment class” attended by about 30 girls, principally Italian, ranging from 14 to nearly 16 years of age. The object of this class was to give special instruction in reading, writing, and spelling to children whose progress in these subjects had been so slow that they had been unable, on becoming 14, to obtain employment certificates. Only children who had attended school in Boston for at least two years were admitted, and each case was carefully investigated to see that home conditions actually necessitated the employment of the child as soon as possible. It was stated that children from this class did not receive their school records until their standard of education in -the three subjects studied was practically the same as that of children who had regularly completed the fourth grade. The law also provided that a school record showing seven or more years of attendance at school might be accepted regardless of the degree of education attained, provided the child, in the opinion of the superintendent of schools, was mentally incapable of acquiring the prescribed educational qualifications. The superintendent of schools was also empowered to suspend the educational require ments “ in any case when, in his opinion, the interests of the child will best be served by such suspension.” 18 But these two exemp tions were rarely, if ever, used in any of the four cities studied. The promise of employment which the child had to bring was a card filled out by the employer bearing the name of the child, the name and address of the employer, the nature of the occupation to which the child was to be assigned, the number of hours during which he was to be regularly employed—which were required by law to be not more than eight and, if he was to be excused from school, not less than six— and the signature of the employer or his authorized man ager or superintendent. These blank cards were widely distributed among employers, but if an employer did not have one the child 17 In one case> for example, a girl who had been in a French school in Montreal applied for a certificate in Boston, and the issuing officer refused to waive the requirement of a school record on the ground that the report brought from the French school did not show that she had completed work in Fnglish equivalent to fourth-grade work in a Boston school. w Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 59, as amended b y Acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 17, and b y Acts of 1914, ch. 580. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 2 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 10 THE W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE B O S T O N . could procure it from.his school or from the certificate office and take, it to the employer to be filled out. If a child brought to the certifi cate office a promise of employment for an occupation prohibited to children under 16 years of age by the sections of the law relating to dangerous occupations, he was told that he must secure another position. When a child had satisfied the requirements as to evidence of age, educational attainments, and the promise of a position, he was given a blank physical examination form, which, together with his promise of employment, on the back of which was the blank form for the physician’s certificate of health, he took to the office of the physician appointed by the school committee to examine children applying for certificates. The certificate of health, according to law, might be signed by a school or family physician; and occasionally a child appeared at the certificate office with the signature of such a physi cian already on the back of his promise of employment. But this rarely happened, for the family doctor had to be paid for his services while the school physician referred the child to the issuing office, where the doctor appointed for that purpose gave free examina tions. The physical examination, in which the physician was assisted b y a nurse, was supposed to be for the particular occupation specified in the promise of employment, but in reality little distinction was made between occupations.19 A child who had a heart lesion, how ever, was not given a certificate for an active or laborious occupa tion; for instance, for work as cash girl. If the physician did not consider the child physically fitted for the occupation specified, he refused to sign the certificate of health until lighter work was found, and if he did not consider the child able to engage in any occupation whatever he withheld the certificate entirely. But only children who were in extremely bad physical condition—for example, who were demonstrably tubercular— were refused health certificates. Such a certificate was temporarily held up, however, if the child had not been vaccinated or had evidence of a communicable disease. In addition, children were frequently advised to secure treatment for minor defects, such as defective teeth or eyes. When a child had secured the physician’s signature on his cer tificate of health he took it to the issuing officer, who made out and gave him his employment certificate to take to his employer. This certificate contained the name and address of the child, the name and address of the employer, the nature of the employment, the date and place of birth, and the age of the child at the time of the issuance of the certificate, the school last attended, the grade completed, the 19Since the date of this study special efforts have been made to raise the physical standards for an employment certificate. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OBTAINING EM PLOYM ENT CERTIFICATES. 11 sex, the color of hair and eyes, and the nature of the evidence of age accepted. The space for “ distinguishing facial marks” was usually left vacant. The blank space for the factory number was filled out later by the employer in large establishments where em ployees were given numbers. The child himself signed the certificate and it was signed also by the issuing officer. The back of the certificate bore instructions to the effect that it did not permit the employment of the child by anyone except the employer named, that the child must either be regularly employed or be in school, and that the certificate must be returned by the employer to the office of the superintendent of schools within two days after the child’s employment had terminated, on penalty of a fine of from $10 to $100. It contained also a blank form for the signature of the parent or guardian in approval of the issuance of the certificate. This was for use when the issuing officer deemed such approval desirable, which was rarely the case. Furthermore, it gave a statement of the exact date when the child would become 16 years of age and should exchange his employment certificate for an educational certificate. A child who wished to be employed only during vacation or out side school hours had to fulfill the same requirements 20 as one who wished to leave school to go to work, except that his promise of employment did not have to show that he would be employed at least six hours a day, as did that of the child who was being excused from school attendance. His certificate was stamped “ Not dis charged from school.” • When a child who had already held one or more certificates wished one for another employer he had only to secure a new promise of employment and a new physician’s certificate of health. In Bòston, if the child had been examined recently and appeared to be in good physical condition, the physician merely looked up his record and, if it showed no serious defects, signed the form on the back of his new promise of employment without making another physical exam ination. If the child appeared to be in bad physical condition or if the previous record showed any defect which would influence the physician in determining the occupation in which the child might engage, he made another.examination. The new employment cer tificate was not issued until after the previous one had been returned to the issuing office. In addition to securing an employment certificate the child under 16 years of age who went to work in Massachusetts was obliged to so A n amendment to the labor law passed in 1916 and effective in the summer vacation of that year, that is, during the last tw o and one-half months of the period within which the children included in the cer tificate series of tables could have taken out certificates, waived the educational requirement of completion of the fourth grade for children employed during the summer vacation only. N one of the children included in the continuation school or interviewed groups would have been affected b y this amendment. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 12 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. submit to regulations concerning the occupations he might enter and the hours he might work. He was prohibited from engaging in any of a long list of occupations— a list which the State board of labor and industries might extend, after hearings, to cover any occupation deemed by it to be sufficiently dangerous or injurious “ to the health or morals of minors under 16 years of age to justify their exclusion.” 21 He was permitted to work only eight hours a day and six days a week. He might not be employed in night work, that is, before 6.30 in the morning or after 6 in the evening.22 And wherever, as in Boston, the school committee had established a continuation school and made attendance compulsory he was obliged to attend for at least four hours a week, between 8 in the morning and 6 in the after noon of a working day. The time spent in continuation school had to be counted as part of his working hours.23 In other words, no child was permitted by law to spend in work and school attendance combined more than eight hours a day. 21 Acts of 1913, ch. 831, secs. 2-4. of 1913, ch. 831, sec. i. 23 Acts of 1913, ch. 805, sec.l 22 Acts https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY. The problem of child labor in Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea is numerically an important one. Of the estimated number of children in these four cities who became 14 years of age during the year ended September 1, 1914, over one-third, 35.2 per cent, or 5,692 children, took out employment certificates for gainful labor before their sixteenth birthdays. The great majority, 4,401, went to work in Boston. Furthermore, Table A, which is based on the records of the Boston certificate office, shows that the number of children going to work in that city increased rapidly from September 1, 1914, to September 1, 1918. During the year which ended on August 31, 1915, 3,342 original certificates were issued in Boston— that is, 3,342 children who had never before held certificates took them out. The next year this number nearly doubled, and in the period from September 1, 1917, to August 31, 1918, the number of children taking out their first certificates was 8,760.x T a b l e A . — Sex o f child, by year o f issue; first and all employment certificates issued in Boston. Employment certificates issued to— Y ear of issue and kind of certificate. Boys. Girls. All children. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. FIRST OR ORIGINAL CERTIFICATES. Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. I jl1914-Aug. 1 , 1915-Aug. 1 , 1916-Aug. 1 , 1917-Aug. 31,1915..................................................... 31,1916......................................... 31,1917..................................................... 31,1918............................................. 3,342 6,653 7,017 8,760 (9 4,145 4,224 4,994 62.3 60.2 57.0 (*). 2,508 2,793 3,766 37.7 39.8 43. Ö 6,412 12,043 16,805 20,683 3,586 7,219 10,262 11,699 55.9 59.9 61.1 56.6 2,826 4^ 824 6,543 8,984 44.1 40.1 38.9 43.4 ALL CERTIFICATES (FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT). Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. 1 , 1914-Aug. 1 , 1915-Aug. 1 , 1916-Aug. 1 , 1917-Aug. 31,1915.................................................... 31,1916............................................. 31,1917..................................................... 31,1918.................................................... 1 N o figures available for sex of children to whom first employment certificates wereissued in Boston m 1914. Some children who take out employment certificates, of course, do not leave school, but work only during vacations or out of school hours. Nevertheless, nearly three-tenths, 28.9 per cent, of all chil dren of the age group considered who lived in Boston at the time of i During the next year this number fell to 6,781, and during the year which ended August 31, 1920, to 6,530. 13 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 14 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. this study became regular workers— that is, left school for work— , before their sixteenth birthdays. About four-fifths, 80.5 per cent, of the children who took out certificates in that city appear to have definitely left school for industry. Nativity and fathers’ nationality.— A decidedly larger proportion of the foreign-born than of the native children— not far from three-fifths, 58.3 per cent, of the foreign born, but less than one-third, 32.3 per cent, of the native children— living in the four cities took out employ ment certificates. Approximately four-fifths, 81.6 per cent, of the children who took out certificates were native born. Russia and Italy furnished considerably larger numbers of foreign-born children than did any other country; only a very few children were bom in Ireland. The foreign-born children who took out certificates more generally became regular, as distinguished from vacation, workers than did the native children. Not far from twice as large a proportion of all the foreign-born as of all the native children living in Boston— nearly one-half, 47.7 per cent, of the foreign born but little over one-fourth, 26.4 per cent, of the native children— became regular workers. Of the children who took out certificates in Boston the foreign born con stituted 18.8 per cent of the regular workers and only 14.5 per cent' of the children who worked only during vacation or out of school hours. Italian children furnished a particularly large proportion, 7.4 per cent, of the regular workers as compared with their proportion, only 2.7 per cent, of the vacation workers. Although only about 2 out of every 10 working children were them selves foreign born, about 7 out of every 10 had foreign-born fathers. Of those interviewed, who may be considered fairly typical, 72.1 per cent were children whose fathers came from some foreign country. More than one-third, 36.1 per cent, had fathers from south and east Europe, and not far from another third, 31.3 per cent, had fathers from north and west Europe'. Comparatively few, only 8.7 per cent, of the native children had Russian-Jewish fathers, but approximately one-fourth, 24.8 per cent, had Italian fathers, and not far from twofifths, 37.7 per cent, had Irish fathers. A comparison of these pro portions for father’s nationality with those for the child’s own nativity shows merely that the immigration of Irish families to Boston has been comparatively slight within recent years, but was heavy a few years ago; that Russian-Jewish family immigration has begun recently, but has brought large numbers; and that Italian families, have been coming in large numbers over a considerable period. Sex.— More boys than girls went to work between 14 and 16 years of age. Boys constituted three-fifths, 60.1 per cent, and girls twofifths, 39.9 per cent, of the children of the age group studied who took out certificates in the four cities. Over two-fifths, 42.3 per cent, of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis IN T R O D U C T O R Y S U M M A R Y . 15 the boys, but not much more than one-fourth, 28 per cent, of the girls of this age group took out employment certificates. But within more recent years, as shown in Table A, there appears to have been a tendency, at least in Boston, for the number of girls entering industry to increase more rapidly than the number of boys. Less difference between boys and girls in the tendency to go to work early was found among foreign-born than among native children, and also among children of foreign parentage than among those of native parentage. Not far from two-thirds, 61.7 per cent, of the foreign-born boys and considerably more than one-half, 54.9 per cent, of the foreign-born girls of the age group studied who were estimated to be living in the four cities, became wage earners before they were 16 years of age. Among the native born the corresponding propor tions were about two-fifths, 39.8 per cent, for the boys and less than one-fourth, 24.7 per cent, for the girls. Of the foreign-born children who went to work nearly half, 46.6 per cent, were girls; but of the native children less than two-fifths, 38.4 per cent, were girls. Simi larly, of the children interviewed whose fathers were foreign bom, only a slightly lower proportion than of those who were themselves foreign born, 44.7 per cent, were girls, while of those whose fathers -.were native not much more than one-third, 36.8 per cent, were girls. Evidently foreign-bom fathers were much more likely to send their daughters, as compared with their sons, to work at an early age than were native fathers. In regard to the tendency to become regular or merely vacation workers, little difference was found between boys and girls. A slightly larger proportion of the girls, as compared with the boys who took out certificates in Boston, became regular workers. Owing to the differ ence in tendency to take out certificates of any kind, over one-third, 34.5 per cent, of all the boys but less than one-fourth, 23.2 per cent, of all the girls of the age group considered who aré estimated to have lived in Boston had left school definitely for industry before they became 16. Among the foreign-born Children the tendency of girls to become regular workers was nearly as pronounced as that of boys, but among the native born a great difference was observed between the two sexes. In Boston nearly one-third, 32.7 per cent, of the native boys, but only about one-fifth, 20.2 per cent, of the native girls had left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays. Age at going to work.—A somewhat larger proportion of children took out employment certificates within the first six months after they became of legal age to work than during any other six-month period. Not far from one-third, 31.4 per cent, of all the children of the age group studied who were given certificates in Boston, and considerably more than one-third, 35.1 per cent, of those who https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 16 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTO N . became regular workers, received their first certificates when between 14 and 14£ years of age. Of all the children who took out certificates^ in the four cities combined, a slightly larger proportion received them during the six months preceding their sixteenth birthdays than during the six months immediately following their fourteenth birthdays; but this was due mainly to the large number of children who went to work during a school vacation before the end of which they would be 16. As these children had not left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays, they were classed in this study as vacation workers, although many of them, possibly a considerable majority, never returned to school. The figures relating to children to whom original employment certificates were issued in Boston during the years from September 1, 1914, to August 31,, 1918, given in Table B, show a somewhat different distribution by age at going to work, but a decided tendency in the later years for more children to take out certificates soon after becoming 14. In the year which ended August 31, 1915, and also in the following year, a slightly larger proportion of children took out certificates when between 15 and 15^ years of age than during any other six-month period; but during the year which ended on August 31, 1917, practically one-third, 33 per cent, of all the children^ taking out their first certificates were between 14 and 14£, and in the next year this proportion rose to 37.2 per cent. These figures, however, like those for the children of the age group studied who took out certificates in the four cities, relate both to children who were going to work only during a vacation and to those who were leaving school permanently for industry. T a b l e B . — A ge o f child and year o f issue; first employment certificates issued in Boston. First employment certificates issued to children of specified age. Year ofissue. Sept. 1 , 1914-Aug. 3 1 ,1 9 1 5 ... Sep t-1,1915-A u g. 3 1 ,1 9 1 6 ... Sept. 1,1916-A u g. 3 1 ,1 9 1 7 ... Sept. 1 , 1917-Aug. 3 1 ,1 9 1 8 ... 14-141 years. A ll chil dren. 3,342 6,653 7,017 8,760 N um ber. 832 1,583 2,319 3,256 Per cent. 24.9 23.8 3 3.0 37.2 14J-15 years. Num . ber. 817 1,595 1,682 2,223 Per cent. 24.4 24.0 24.0 25.4 15-15£ years. N um ber. Per cent. 853 1,747 1,604 1,849 25.5 26.3 22.9 21.1 15J-16 years. N um Per ber. • cent. 840 1,728 1,412 1,432 25.1 26.0 20.1 16.3 The tendency for children to go to work within the first six months after they became 14 was more marked among the native than among the foreign born, apparently because many of the foreignborn children, and especially of those who had. been in the United States less than five years, were prevented from going to work early https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 17 _by inability to meet the educational requirements of the employmentcertificate law. That the foreign-born children, if unhampered by educational requirements, would have gone to work as soon as they were old enough appears probable from the fact that among the children interviewed the comparatively large proportion of native children going to work before they were 14£ years of age was found to be due entirely to children whose fathers were foreign bom . In this group both the foreign-born children and the native children of foreign-born fathers showed a greater tendency than did the native children of native fathers to leave school for work within one month after their fourteenth birthdays. The general tendency in regard to age at going to work was the same for both sexes, although the boys showed a slightly greater tendency than did the girls to take out certificates soon after becom ing 14, especially for vacation work. Among the native children of native fathers this difference was marked, but it was much less evident among the native children of foreign-born fathers, and appears not to have existed among the foreign-born children. Evidence o f age.— The great majority of children who had been born in the United States— 87.9 per cent of those born in Boston, -Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea and 77.2 per cent of those born elsewhere in the United States— produced official birth records as evidence of age when applying for their employment certificates. Moreover, most of thé other children born in the United States— 10.1 per cent of the first group and 11.7 per cent of the second— produced baptismal certificates which were equally acceptable. In spite of the fact that during a large part of this period the World War so interfered with communication with foreign countries that children were not required to send abroad for evidence of age, nearly half, 46 per cent, even of the foreign-born children, produced official records of birth, and 9.2 per cent produced records of baptism. Many of the foreign-born children, however, were obliged to use passports or other official or religious records, 18 per cent, or school registers, 21.9 per cent, as evidence of age; and 3.9 per cent of the foreignborn children, as compared with only 2.1 per cent even of the native children born outside and with only three-tenths of 1 per cent of those born in one of the four cities, could obtain no documents and were obliged to resort to a physician’s examination for evidence of age. Family conditions. Of the children of the age group studied who were in Boston continuation school, and all of whom were, therefore regular workers, exactly two-thirds are known to have lived at the time they went to work in normal families; that is, in families with both a father (or stepfather) and mother (or stepmother) in the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 18 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. home. A few, 2.8 per cent, were not living with either parent, and nearly 1 in 20, 4.4 per cent, had either lost their mothers or had mothers who were not living with the family. A much larger pro portion, however, 17.7 per cent, had lost their fathers, either by death or desertion, but were living with their mothers. Economic need, therefore, caused by the death of the father or by the fact that for some reason he was not living with his family appears to have caused many children to leave school for work. The proportion of regular workers who came from broken families was highest among native children of native parentage, next highest among native children of foreign parentage, and lowest among foreign-born children. Evidently the death or desertion of the father was more often a factor in the circumstances leading to the child’s employment in native than in foreign families. This was due to the greater tendency of children from foreign than from native families to leave school for work, even when home conditions were normal. Although desertion by the father appears to have played its part in sending children from school to work, for the fathers of 21 of the 823 children interviewed were not living with their families, the death of the father appears to have been a much more important factor. Only about one-eighth, 12.2 per cent,2 of children of 14 would normally have lost their fathers by death, yet approximately one-fifth, 20.7 per cent, of the children interviewed, and nearly one-fourth, 24.4 per cent, of those of native parentage, including all who had stepfathers, had lost their own fathers by death. The unemployment of the father of the family also appears to have been less important than his death as a causal factor in the child’s going to work. The information as to unemployment relates, however, merely to the date when the child took out his first certifi cate. If a father’s work was irregular but he happened to be em ployed on that precise date, his occupation was given and nothing appears on the record to show that his irregular work may have necessitated his child’s labor. Nevertheless, the fathers of about one-eighth, 12.8 per cent, of the interviewed children whose fathers were living with their families were unemployed at the time the chil dren went to work. The proportion of children who had unem ployed fathers was about the same in each of the three main nativity groups; but a considerably larger proportion of girls than of boys, 15.5 per cent as compared with 10.7 per cent, had unemployed fathers. Of the interviewed children whose fathers were living with their“ families more than one-half had fathers who were laborers, factory t Estim ated from the m ortality during 14 years of males aged 30 as given in TJ. S. Life Tables, 1910. The estimate is purposely slightly overstated in assuming a rather high average age of fathers at the births of their children and in assuming that the m ortality of males applies to married m ales. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 19 .operatives, or skilled or semiskilled mechanics. The fathers of almost one-fifth, 18.6 per cent, were laborers, but exactly the same propor tion had fathers who were skilled or semiskilled mechanics, and nearly as many, 14.3 per cent, had fathers who were factory opera tives. The other two groups of occupations which showed the largest proportions were teamsters, drivers, and expressmen, 8.2 per cent, and merchants and peddlers, 8 per cent. A very small propor tion, only 1.6 per cent, of these children had fathers who were clerical workers. The native children of native parentage had a larger proportion of fathers who were skilled or semiskilled mechanics, those of foreign parentage a larger proportion who were laborers, and the foreignborn children larger proportions who were factory operatives and who were merchants or peddlers. Doubtless because relatively more of them were foreign born a considerably larger proportion of the fathers of working girls than of working boys were laborers, and a much smaller proportion were skilled or semiskilled mechanics. The mothers of a considerable number, more than 1 in 6, 17.5 per cent, of the children interviewed were employed in some gainful occupation. In families where the father was native, the mother Appears to have been more likely to go to work before the child was sent into industry than in those where the father was foreign born, and in families where the father was foreign born but the child native than in those where both father and child were foreign born. Simi larly, mothers appear to have gone to work before their daughters more frequently than before their sons in each nativity group except that of foreign-born children. In families where the father was unemployed, and to an even more marked degree in those where the father was dead or not living at home, the mother was much more likely to have preceded the child into industry than in normal families. About one-fourth, 25.9 per cent, of the children whose fathers were unemployed, and two-fifths, 40 per cent, of those whose fathers were dead or not living with their families, had employed mothers. Less than onehalf, only 44.7 per cent, of the fatherless children had mothers at home and not employed as compared with more than four-fifths, 83.6 per cent, of the children whose fathers were living at home and employed. Not all children, however, from families in which conditions might seem to indicate economic pressure, stated, when asked why they were leaving school, that their earnings were needed at home; and on the other hand, because of large families, low earnings of the fathers, illness or some other reason, many children from normal https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 20 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. families gave this as their reason for going to work. Economic need was given as a reason for leaving school by only twofifths, 40.5 per cent, of all the children interviewed as compared with more than one-half, 53.5 per cent, of those whose fathers were dead or not living with their families, with not far from three-fifths, 57 per cent, of those whose mothers were employed and with over three-fourths, 77.8 per cent, of those whose fathers were unem ployed.3 In spite of the fact that both the death or desertion of the father and the employment of the mother seem to have been more closely correlated with the employment of the children in families where the children were native born of native fathers than in any other nativity group, little more than one-third, 34.3 per cent, of these children, as contrasted, for example, with nearly two-thirds, 63.7 per cent, of those bom in Italy, gave economic necessity as their reason for going into industry. To a certain extent this may have been due to unwillingness on the part of the native children of native parent age to confess to poverty, but in large part it was probably due to the actual existence of greater economic need in the families of immigrants, and particularly in those of recent immigrants. That girls, particularly native girls of native parentage, are less likely than boys to go to work unless their earnings are actually needed, appears again to be indicated by the fact that nearly onehalf, 48.6 per cent, of the girls, but little more than one-third, 34.6 per cent, of the boys, stated that they were leaving school because of the economic necessities of their families. Decided differences between girls and boys in this respect were found in each group classified by the child’s nativity and the father’s nationality, but the contrast was particularly striking among the native children of native fathers, where 44.6 per cent of the girls, but only 28.3 per cent of the boys, gave economic necessity as their reason for leaving school to go to work. Leaving school.— A considerable number of children in the Boston continuation school, all of whom were regular workers, left school when under 14 years of age. The proportion was 8.1 per cent. Many of these children doubtless left school at the beginning of a summer vacation before the end of which they became 14 and took out employment certificates, so that they did not all violate the compulsory school attendance law. The same can not be said, how ever, for the 44 children who left school when less than 13£ years of age. 3 it m ust be borne in m ind that the child’s statement as to the reason w hy he left school for industry m ay not in all cases be trustworthy. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 21 Both the children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families and those both of whose parents were dead or not living with their families showed a tendency to leave school, as well as to go to work, younger than those from normal families. A better measure, however, of the amount of absence from school during the transition to industry is found in the time during school term which elapsed between the date of leaving school and the date of taking the first regular position. Nearly one-third, 31.3 per cent, of the interviewed children were out of school a week or more at this time. About one-sixth, 16.4 per cent, were out from one week to a month, and nearly one-tenth, 9.4 per cent, from one to three months, while 3.4 per cent were out from three to six, and 2.2 per cent six months or more. The proportion who lost one or more weeks of school time was highest among the native children of native fathers and lowest among the foreign-born children. It was higher among the girls than among the boys, and the girls also lost longer periods of time. Over two-fifths, 41-9 per cent, of the native girls of native parentage were out of school for a week or more, and about one-sixth, 16.2 per cent, for three or more months just before they went to work. It should be remembered that some of these girls, however, who were over 14 years of age, may have held special home permits which entitled them to be- legally out of school. Although those permits were much less frequently given to boys than to girls, a few boys also may have held them. It would appear that entrance into industry is frequently preceded by absence from school, and in many cases by long periods of absence, and that this is particularly common among native children of native parentage, especially girls. To what extent the children— or their parents— took their school work seriously enough to wait until the completion of the year’s work before leaving school for industry is shown in the figures relating to the number of children who went to work during the summer vacation and during the school term. As promotions took place in the Boston schools only in June, children who went to work at any other time than during the summer vacation must either have failed to attend school as required by law or else must have dropped their school careers without regard to the completion of the grade which they had begun. Yet there was nearly as great a tendency to go to work during the school term as during the summer vacation, for nearly three-fourths, 72.8 per cent, of the children interviewed went to work fduring the school year, which constituted only about three-fourths of the calendar year. Evidently there was nearly as great a tendency https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 22 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. to go to work during the school term as during the summer vacations^ The slightly greater tendency to go to work in the summer was entirely among the girls. Children whose fathers were unemployed were more likely to go to work during the school year than those whose fathers were employed. But this disregard of their schooling was not unusually prevalent among children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families, perhaps because in many of these cases the death or desertion had occurred some time before the child was of working age and the family affairs had already been at least partially adjusted to meet the situation. Although economic pressure was more frequently given as a reason for leaving school by the children of foreign-bom fathers, it was the native children of native fathers who were most likely to go to work during a school term. This was not due t o . any greater tendency among native children of native parentage to wait until autumn, when they would be obliged either to return to school or to go to work— before securing positions— but to their greater tendency, particulary that of the boys, to go to work in the spring before the closing of school. Almost exactly one-fourth, 24.9 per cent, of all the boys interviewed, but not far from one-third, 30 per cent, of those whose fathers were native took their first regular positions during April or May. The Russian-Jewish children, on the other hand, appear to have been less likely than children of any other nationality group to go to work in the middle of a school year, and showed no special tendency to take positions in the spring. The fact that girls showed less tendency than boys to go to work in April or May may be due in part to more opportunities, especially for outdoor work, open to boys at this season. Regardless of any special opportunities, however, it seems probable that many children, especially boys, left school shortly before the end of the session in order to secure the better positions before the closing of the schools released other applicants. Knowledge that they were not to be pro moted in school may also have been a factor in causing some children to leave school for work in the spring. The end of the school year in June is generally believed to be the period of the greatest influx of children into industry; and, if both vacation and regular workers are considered, this belief is doubtless correct. But that it probably is not true for regular workers alone appears to be indicated, not only by the foregoing facts, but by the fact that only about one-tenth, 9.8 per cent, of the children inter viewed—-all regular workers—went to work in June after the close of the school year. During the entire month of June only a little https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 23 over one-eighth, 13.1 per cent, of these children took their first regular positions. The proportion going to work during the month of Sep tember, on the other hand, was more than one-sixth, 17.4 per cent. The girls showed an even greater tendency than the boys to go to work rather than to return to school in the fall. September, then, appears to be the most popular month for the children who are defi nitely leaving school to begin their industrial careers, a fact which seems to point to lack of adjustment to school life as a very important reason for leaving school. In fact, about one-fifth, 20.2 per cent, of all the children inter viewed stated that their reason for leaving was that they were dis contented with school, either because they disliked their school or their teacher, or because of slow progress or failure to receive a pro motion. To these children may be added the one-eighth, 12.3 per cent, who said, when asked why they left school, that they wished to work, and also perhaps the small proportion, 4 per cent, who had finished the eighth grade and did not wish to go on to high school. Discontent with school was more often given as a reason for leaving by native children, of both native and foreign-born fathers, than by foreign-born children and by boys than by girls. But these differ ences are accounted for by the greater proportions of foreign-bom children and of girls who stated that they left because of economic need for their earnings. Grade completed.— If a child began school at 6 and continued steadily without repeating grades he would have completed the grammar-school course by the time he was 14. Yet little more than one-half, 52.4 per cent, of the 14 and 15 year old children who took out certificates in Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea had com pleted the eighth or a higher grade in a regular school. A slightly larger proportion, 54.1 per cent, of those who took out certificates in Boston alone had completed the grammar-school course. But even if all the children from vocational, disciplinary, and other special schools were considered to have completed the eighth grade, the proportion would be under three-fifths. Within more recent years, as shown in Table C, the proportion of children taking out certificates in Boston who had completed the eighth or a higher grade has been between 55 and 60 per cent. Between September 1, 1914, and August 31, 1918, some tendency was shown for the proportion who had completed high school or other grades above the eighth to increase. This may be due partly, however, to an increase in the proportion of children who worked only during vacations or out of school hours. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 24 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. T able C.— Grade completed by child, and year o f issue; first employment certificates issued in B oston. .f t First employment certificates issued to— Children who had completed specified grade. Year of issue. A ll children. Lower than fourth. Fourth. Fifth. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Sept. Sept. Sept; Sept. 1 , 1914-Aug. 31,1915 1 , 1915-Aug. 31,1916 1, 1916-Aug. 31,1917 1 , 1917-Aug. 31,1918 2 *43 3,342 6,653 7,017 8,760 139 130 0.1 185 271 245 322 .6 .6 .3 5.5 4.1 3.5 3.7 228 485 563 609 6.8 7.3 8.0 7.0 First employment certificates issued to— Children who had completed specified grade. Year of issue. Seventh. Sixth. Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. 1 , 1914-Aug. 1 , 1915-Aug. 1 , 1916-Aug. 1 , 1917-Aug. 31,1915....................... 31,1916....................... 31,1917....................... 31,1918...................... Eighth. Higher than eighth. N um ber. Per cent. N um ber. Per cent. N um ber. Per cent. N um ber. 467 845 976 1,217 14.0 12.7 13.9 13.9 493 1,083 1,199 1,558 14.8 16.3 17.1 17.8 994 1.655 1.655 2,252 29.7 24.9 23.6 25.7 973 2,271 2,340 2,772 Per cent. 29.1 34. r 33.3 31.6 i The increase in number of certificates granted to children from grades lower than the fourth was due to a change in the law, first effective in the summer of 1916, which permitted the issuance of vacation certificates to children who had not fulfilled the educational requirements of the law, namely, completion of fourth grade. W ith this exception, all children receiving certificates were obliged to have completed the fourth grade, except children who had attended school 7 years and whom the issuing officer deemed incapable of completing that grade. The vacation workers included in this study, because of the fact that they were, on an average, decidedly older than the regular workers, would be expected to have completed higher grades. The difference, however, is even greater than would be expected from the mere difference in age. Nearly three-fourths, 73 per cent, of the children who were employed only during vacations or out of school hours, as compared with less than one-half, 49.6 per cent, of those who left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays, had com pleted the eighth or a higher grade in regular schools. The difference between vacation and regular workers in the proportion who had completed one or more years of/high-school work is even more striking, 48 per cent as compared with 13.8 per cent. These figures suggest that the children who were well advanced in school may have been more likely to work only during vacations while those who were behind were more likely to leave school for regular positions in industry. The tendency, already noted, for foreign-bom children to become regular rather than vacation workers appears to be in part, at least, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 25 responsible for the different proportions of children from the higher and the lower grades who worked regularly and merely during vaca tions. Only about one-third, 33.1 per cent, of the foreign-bom chil dren, as compared with considerably more than one-half, 56.7 per cent, of the native children, had completed the eighth or a higher grade. One in 8, 12.5 per cent, of the foreign-born children, and about 1 in 5, 21.4 per cent, of those born in Italy, were barely able to satisfy the low educational requirements for a certificate, completion of the fourth grade. Of the children bom in Russia, however, a very creditable proportion, 44.2 per cent, as compared with only 15.7 per cent of those born in Italy, had completed the eighth or a higher grade. Even the proportion, 56.7 per cent, of native children who had completed the grammar-school course seems low when it is remembered that all these children were over 14, and a large number over 15 years of age. Many of the native children were of foreign parentage, and it is interesting to note for the children interviewed— the only group for which the nationality of the father is available— the differences in grade attained between the native children whose fathers also were native and those whose fathers were foreign born. As would be jexpected, the proportion of native children of native fathers who had completed the eighth or a higher grade was somewhat larger than that of native children of foreign-born fathers, 54.8 per cent as com pared with 48.5 per cent. The difference was slight as compared with that between the native children of foreign-born fathers and the foreign-born children, little more than one-fourth, 27.7 per cent, of whom had completed the grammar-school course. All the children interviewed, of course, were regular workers, and their grade standing averaged considerably lower than that of the entire group of children who took out certificates, including vacation workers. In each different group of children, except the native, smaller pro portions of girls than of boys came from the eighth and higher grades. This difference appears to have been due, at least in part, to the longer periods among girls than among boys between leaving school and going to work. Both boys and girls who had completed the seventh or eighth grades were more likely than those from lower grades to remain out of school for a time during this transition. In the case of eighth-grade graduates this was undoubtedly due primarily to diffi culty in enforcing high-school attendance. Although many of the girls and some of the boys may have held special home permits during this interval between school and industry, it is significant that about 1 in 8, 12.4 per cent, of the girls who had completed only the seventh or eighth grades, as compared with only about 1 in 20, 4.9 per cent, of the boys, were out of school for three months or more at this time. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 3 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 26 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. That the girls who took regular positions before they were 16 were less likely than the boys to go on from the grammar to the high school is further shown by the fact that the difference between the proportions of the two sexes who left school upon completion of the eighth grade was small as compared with the difference between the proportions who had completed a high-school grade. The same causes which make it necessary for a child to go to work may also lead to retardation, and that they probably did so among the children studied is suggested by thè fact that an even larger pro portion of those who gave economic reasons for leaving school than of those who stated that they left because of slow progress or nonpro motion had completed only the sixth or a lower grade. It should be remembered, however, that the reason given by the child for leaving school may not in all cases have been the true one. Retardation.— Actual retardation, measured on the conservative scale adopted for this report,3“ appears to have been very frequent among the children who left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays. Not far from one-third, 31.5 per cent, of the children who took out certificates in Boston for work during school hours were found to be retarded. For the other two groups of regular workers, those for whom continuation school records were used and those who were interviewed, the percentages of retarded children were nearly the same, 31.4 and 32.4, respectively. Children who were in normal, and especially those who were in higher than normal grades for their ages appear, on the other hand, when they worked at all, to have sought employment during vacations or out of school hours, rather than to have left school. Only onesixth of the vacation workers, as compared with more than threetenths of the regular workers, were retarded; and a surprisingly large proportion, over three-tenths, of the vacation workers, as compared with less than one-tenth of the regular workers, had com pleted higher grades than normal for their ages. About half, 50.6 per cent, of the vacation workers, but less than half, 48.1 per cent, of the regular workers, had completed normal grades. Nor was the high percentage of retardation among regular workers due entirely to the comparatively large proportion of children of foreign birth among •those who left school for industry before they were 16 years of age. Even of the native children for whom continuation school records were taken— all regular workers— more than one-fourth, 27.5 per cent, had failed to attain a normal grade before leaving school. The cor responding proportion for the foreign-born children, however, wasnearly half, 48.2 per cent, and for the Italian children it was not far from two-thirds, 63.1 per cent. so See pp. 126-127, and appendix, p. 362. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 27 All the children who were born in this country-had enjoyed pre sumably the same school advantages and had been required to attend for the same period. Nevertheless, for some reason, perhaps in part because of the use of foreign languages in their homes and in part because of other unfavorable home conditions affecting both their health and their ambition for success in school, the native children of foreign parentage were more often retarded than were the native children o f native parentage. Less than one-fourth, 22.9 per cent, of the latter group of children, those with fathers born in this coun try, were retarded, as compared with not far from one-third, 31.9 per cent, of the children interviewed who were native born of foreign parentage. Thus the difference between the native children of native and of foreign-born fathers in the matter of retardation is greater than in that of grade attained. Of the foreign-born children, not far from half, 45.2 per cent, were retarded. Apparently the difference between native and foreign-born children in retardation, as well as in grade attained, was greater than that between native children of native and those of foreign parentage. Among children of foreign parentage retardation appears to have had a close connection with language difficulties, for it was found that over two-fifths of the children interviewed whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities, and only one-fourth of those whose fathers were foreign born of English-speaking nationali ties were retarded. A t the same time, the foreign-born children in the Boston continuation school who had been in the United States long enough to have begun their school lives here were much less likely to be retarded than were the foreign-born children who had come to this country since they were of school age. But that this latter difference was due in part, at least, merely to changes in schools is suggested by the fact that among the native children who took out certificates in the four cities a similar difference appears between those born in Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea and those born elsewhere in the United States. Children of Italian fathers furnished the largest percentage of retardation, while comparatively little retardation was found among children whose fathers were Russian Jews. As in the case of grade attained, girls made a poorer showing than boys. In each group— children given certificates, continuationschool children, and children who were interviewed—larger propor tions of girls than of boys were retarded and smaller proportions were advanced in their school work. Among the interviewed children this difference was particularly striking between the foreign-born boys and girls and was slight between the native boys and girls whose fathers were foreign born. The high percentage of retardation among foreign-born children appears to have been due primarily to the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 28 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. girls, 52.2 per cent of whom were retarded as compared with only 36.8 per cent of the boys. Nevertheless, among the children of" Italian fathers a larger proportion of boys than of girls was retarded. The group of continuation-school children who went to work within six months after becoming 14 years of age contained an unusually large proportion both of retarded and of advanced children as com pared with the groups going to work within any other six months’ period. Some retarded children were probably prevented from going to work until after their fifteenth birthdays by inability to meet earlier the low educational requirement for a certificate— completion of the fourth grade— for a slightly larger proportion of retarded chil dren was found among those who went to work when over 15 than when between 14 and 15, and both groups of children who went to work when over 15 showed unusually high proportions who were three or more grades below normal for their ages. The effect of family conditions and the economic status of the family upon retardation among the children studied is not capable of any exact statement. The data concerning family conditions relate only to the time when the child took out his first certificate, whereas the home influences which might cause retardation would cover the entire period of the child’s school life. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that of the children attending the Boston continuation school both of whose parents were employed and also among those both of whose parents were unemployed— neither a normal family status— unusually large proportions were retarded. That the employment or absence from home of the mother may have more influence on the retardation of the child than the status of the father is suggested, too, not only by the higher proportion of retarded children who had both parents employed than who had both parents unemployed but also by the somewhat larger proportion whose mothers than whose fathers were dead or not living with their families. The father’s occupation, which is a rough index to the economic status of the family, appears to have had some connection with the child’s retardation, even when differences due solely to the distribution of fathers of the various nationality groups among the occupations are eliminated. Children of skilled or semiskilled mechanics and of factory operatives were found, for example, to have been much less frequently retarded than would be expected in those groups if the rate of retardation prevailing in the different nationality groups had prevailed also in each occupational group of the particular nationality. On the other hand, the children of laborers and of merchants and peddlers were more frequently retarded than would be expected. At the same time, the conclusion that the economic pressure which forces the child into industry often causes also his retardation in school is strengthened by the fact that a larger proportion of the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 29 „.children who gave economic reasons for leaving school were retarded than of those who gave all other reasons, and even than of those who stated that they had left school because they disliked their school or their teacher or because of slow progress or failure to obtain a promotion. Retarded children showed a more pronounced tendency than any other group to take their first positions during the school year. Of all the children interviewed who went to work during a summer vacation only 19.2 per cent, but of those who went to work at some other time, 37.4 per cent, were retarded. This tendency appeared in each nationality group, but particularly among the children of foreignbom fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities, notably the Italian. A t the same time less than one-fourth, 24 per cent, of the retarded children, as compared with nearly one-third, 32.3 per cent, of the normal children and with 44.1 per cent of the advanced children, lost one week or more of school time between leaving school and going to work. Evidently the retarded children more frequently went imme diately to work upon leaving school than did the normal and advanced children. Many of the latter, doubtless, finished a school year and then failed to return to begin the new grade in the fall. The greater tendency of girls than of boys to stay out of school before going to work was found mainly not among retarded girls but among girls from normal and higher than normal grades for their ages. Work before leaving school.—Many of the children who left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays had also worked during vacation periods or out of school hours before leaving school. Some of this work was done after they were 14 years of age, but many of the interviewed children, who were questioned as to all the positions they had ever held, were found to have worked before they were 14, when, of course, they could not secure certificates. Not all this work, however, was illegal, for in some cases it was in occupations in which children were permitted to work under 14 during vacations or outside school hours, and in others street-trades licenses, which boys could get at 12 years of age, had been secured. The children interviewed, it should be remembered, were decidedly younger when they left school for work than was the average child taking his first regular position, so that they had had comparatively little time for vacation work. Nevertheless, about two-fifths, 39.4 per cent, of all these children, and not far from three-fifths, 58.7 per cent, of the boys, had been employed before leaving school; and all hut 46 of the 324 who had been employed had begun their vacation work before they were 14, at least 40 before 12, and 12 before 10 years of age. Comparatively few girls, only about one-eighth:, 12.7 per cent, worked before leaving school, and a much larger proportion of them than of the boys secured their first school positions after they were 14, and worked only during a vacation period. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 30 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Opportunities to work before or after school hours or on Saturdaysduring school term at such occupations as street trading, odd jobs, and outdoor work appear to have been much more common for boys than for girls. Because of these opportunities and also because most of the boys took their first school positions before they were 14 years of age when factory and mechanical occupations were closed to them by law, nearly nine-tenths, 89.6 per cent, of the boys who worked before leaving school were first engaged in occupations classed as “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.” Over two-fifths, 41.1 per cent, of these first school positions held,by boys were for occupations involving selling, generally as newsboys or peddlers’ helpers; but an even larger proportion, 46.1 per cent, were for messenger, errand, and delivery work. Owing to the fact that a larger proportion of girls than of boys took their first school positions when they were over 14 years of age, 9 of the 15 children who were employed in factory or mechanical occupa tions were girls. Only 29 first school positions, 11 of them held by girls, were for personal and domestic occupations. These positions constituted 9 per cent of all the first school positions held by both sexes, and this percentage was noticeably larger than the percentage, 4.6, of regular positions in personal and domestic occupations. Foreign-born children, especially Italians, showed a greater tendency than did native children to leave school definitely for work rather than to go through an intermediate period of combined school and work. The tendency of native children to work before leaving school was entirely, however, among the boys. Similarly, a larger proportion of native children of native than of foreign-born fathers worked before leaving school, and this again was true only for the boys, the girls showing an opposite tendency. The native boys whose fathers were native appear, however, to have been more likely than those whose fathers were foreign born to take school positions for work during vacation only, and less likely to work during school term only. The work done before leaving school appears to have been less desultory and irregular than might be expected. Two-thirds, 66.7 per cent, of the children who worked before leaving school held only one school position, though over one-fifth, 21.3 per cent, held two, nearly one-tenth, 9.3 per cent, three, and nine boys, 2.8 per cent of the total number of children, four or more positions each. More than one-third, 34.6 per cent, of these positions lasted less than three months; but a surprisingly large proportion, 30.2 per cent, lasted for a year or more and nearly one-sixth, 15.9 per cent, for two years or more. The positions held by girls were much more frequently of short duration than those held by boys. On the other hand, as would be expected from the fact that the girls’ positions were more fre quently for work only during vacation, their hours of labor averaged https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 31 decidedly longer than those of boys. In comparatively few, only 19.6 per cent, of the positions held by boys but the great majority, 62.2 per cent, of those held by girls the hours worked were 36 or over a week. More than one-third, 34.9 per cent, of the boys’ positions involved between 12 and 24 hours and more than one-fourth, 27 per cent, less than 12 hours work a week. In nearly one-half, 48.8 per cent, of the positions in which children worked less than 12 hours they were employed for only one day a week. Over half, 51.3 per cent, of all the positions held by both sexes in which the hours were from 24 to 48 a week were held for less than three months, and most of these were vacation positions. Nevertheless, practically one-fifth, 19.9 per cent, of the positions in which the hours were from 24 to 48 a week were held for a year or over, and not far from one-fourth, 23.4 per cent, of the positions in which the hours were from 12 to 24 a week lasted for two years or more. Although weekly wages depended to a considerable extent upon weekly hours of labor, some of these children appear to have received somewhat high rates of compensation, considering the hours, for the work they did before leaving school as compared with the rates usually prevailing in the positions which they held after leaving school. In more than one-third, 35.3 per cent, of the positions in which the hours were from 24 to 48 a week the children received $4 or more, whereas in over three-fourths, 76.6 per cent, of those in which the hours were from 12 to 24 they received less than $4. Nevertheless, in not far from one-third, 31.1 per cent, of the positions in which children worked from 12 to 24 hours— that is, from two to four*hours daily on an average they made $3 or more a week, and 13 boys working these hours made $4 or over a week, 3 of them $6 or more. A larger proportion of the children who had worked than of those who had not worked before leaving school took their first regular positions during school term. At the same time those who had worked showed themselves more likely than those who had not worked to go straight from school to industry without losing any important amount of school time in the transfer. Little over one-fourth, 26.9 per cent, of the children who had worked, but more than one-third, 34.3 per cent, of those who had not worked before leaving school, had lost one week or more of school time between leaving school and taking their first regular positions. This difference was due almost entirely, however, to the large number of girls who had not worked previously who lost school time during the transfer to industry. Among the children who were interviewed vacation work meant, in most cases, work before the fourteenth birthday, which was per formed without having secured employment certificates. In other words, it meant work performed at an age and under conditions when it might most logically be expected to have an influence upon https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 32 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. standing in school. It is not surprising, therefore, to find that a larger proportion of the children who had worked, 36.1 per cent, than of those who had not worked, 30.1 per cent, before leaving school were retarded, and that a smaller proportion, 13.3 per cent as compared with 18.6 per cent, had completed higher grades than normal for their ages. Nor is it surprising to find that work during school term appears to have had more serious effects on school standing than work done at any other time. Of the children whose first positions were held only during school term, .45.1 per cent were retarded, as compared with 31.1 per cent of those whose first positions were held during both school term and vacation and with 28.2 per cent of those whose first positions were held only during vacation. As two-thirds of the children who worked before leaving school held only one position, these figures seem to indicate that employment during school term is likely to cause a child to fall behind in his school work. Occupations.— The occupations in which children between 14 and 16 years of age could be employed were of course decidedly restricted by their ages, lack of physical strength, and lack of education and experience. To a certain extent they were also restricted by law, particularly by the provisions in regard to hours, continuation-schôol attendance, and employment on machines. As a result most of the positions held by the children studied were for simple mechanical tasks or for running errands or carrying articles either inside or out side the establishment. Although none of these positions required any real skill, some of them permitted the development of a certain dexterity, and others made it possible for the child to acquire a little practical knowledge of the business apart from his own small task. A few of them, doubtless, offered opportunities for promo tion to more skilled or responsible positions if the child remained, which he rarely did, until he grew older. In the vast majority of cases, however, the occupation was not of such a character as to offer either a future in itself or training for any other occupation by which the child could hope to earn a living as an adult. Not far from two-thirds— 63.5 per cent— of all the positions held by children who took out certificates in the four cities were for “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, or delivery of goods, etc.,” and most of the others— 33 per cent of all—were for factory or mechanical occupations. The most important of the clerical and similar occupations was messenger, errand, and delivery work, which alone furnished nearly one-third— 32.8 per cent— of all these posi tions; and next most important was cash and messenger work in department stores, which furnished about one-eighth— 12.4 per cent. Office work accounted for 7.3 per cent, packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work for 6.8 per cent, and selling for 4.1 per cent. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 33 INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. -As positions for messenger and office work in factories, as well as for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work, were classified under clerical and similar occupations, most of the positions for fac tory and mechanical occupations involved work as factory opera tives. The only other kind of employment under this general desig nation was work as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades, and only 2.6 per cent of these positions could be thus classified. Few positions were in personal or domestic or any other occupations out side the two main groups—factory and mechanical occupations and u clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, or delivery of goods.” The increase in child labor which, as already noted, occurred in Boston during the war period appears to have been more conspicu ous in factories than in workshops, stores, or other places. According to Table D, the proportion of first certificates which were issued for factories during the year ended August 31, 1916, was 38.4 per cent. During the next year this proportion dropped to 37.4 per cent, while the proportion issued for workshops increased from 16 to 18.3 per. cent. During the year ended August 31, 1918, the proportion for factories rose to 42.6 per cent and that for workshops dropped back to 16 per cent. Meanwhile the proportion of first certificates for work in stores decreased from 24.7 per cent to 21.5 per cent, and then to 20 per cent. Similar changes occurred in the figures relating to all certificates issued. The figures in this table, however, are based upon a purely industrial classification, and therefore can not be compared with those for positions held by the children studied during this inquiry, which are based upon a classification primarily according to occupation. T able D . — Place o f em ploym ent;and year o f issue; first and all employment certificates issued in Boston. Em ploym ent certificates issued for work in specified place of employment. Year of issue and kind of certificate. FIRST Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. (O R ORIGINAL) TIFICATES. 1, 1914-Aug. 1 , 1915-Aug. 1 , 1916-Aug. 1 , 1917-Aug. Sept. Sept. Sept. Sept. 1 , 1914-Aug. 1, 1915-Aug. 1 , 1916-Aug. 1 , 1917-Aug. N um ber. 3,342 6,653 7,017 8,760 6,412 12,043 16,805 20,683 Workshops. Per cent. N um ber. . 2,554 2,623 3,729 38.4 37.4 42.6 1,066 1,281 1,405 2,058 4,766 6,498 9,522 32.1 39.6 38.7 46.0 2,107 3,570 3,453 Per cent. Stores. N um ber. Per cent. Other places. N um ber. Per cent. CER- 33, 1 9 1 5 ... 31, 1 9 1 6 ... 3 1 ,1 9 1 7 ... 3 1 ,1 9 1 8 ... -ALL CERTIFICATES ORIGINAL AND QUENT)— Factories. A ll places of em ploy ment. i 1) (i) (!) 16.0 18.3 16.0 (i) 1,645 1,510 1,749 24.7 21.5 2 0 .0 1,388 1,603 1,877. 1,948 2,714 3,605 3,580 30.4 22.5 21.5 17.3 2,456 3,132 4| 128 20.9 2 2 .8 21.4 (BOTH SUBSE- 3 1 ,1 9 1 5 ... 3 1 ,1 9 1 6 ... 3 1 ,1 9 1 7 ... 3 1 ,1 9 1 8 ... ( 2) 17.5 2 1 .2 16.7 1 N o figures available for places of employment in 1914. a Separate figures for workshops and other places not available for 1914. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2) The total is 2,406. 20.4 18.6 2 0 .0 34 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Among the children included in this study considerable difference was found in the occupational distribution of boys and of girls. More than one-half, 51.7 per cent, of the certificates taken out by boys in the four cities were for messenger, errand, and delivery work, and nearly nine-tenths, 89 per cent, of the certificates taken out for this kind of work were held by boys. Although less than one-tenth, 9.4 per cent, of the positions held by boys were for office work, this occupation also showed a preponderance of boys who held not far from three-fourths, 72.7 per cent, of the office-work certificates. Boys also held most, 89.4 per cent, of the positions as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades. On the other hand, nearly half, 48.3 per cent, of the certificates taken out by girls were for work as operatives in factories, and nearly seven-tenths, 69.1 per cent, of the certificates taken out for this kind of work were held by girls. In clothing factories and other needle trades a particularly large proportion, 94.3 per cent, of the positions were held by girls. Girls also preponderated in cash and messenger work in department stores and in packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work. More than one-sixth, 17.3 per cent, of the girls’ positions were for cash and, messenger work in department stores, and girls held three-fifths, 60.7 per cent, of the positions for" this kind of work. Similarly, one-eighth, 12.4 per cent, of the girls’ positions were for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work, and girls held four-fifths, 80 per cent, of the positions for this kind of work. As would be expected, a larger proportion of the posi tions held by girls than of those held by boys were in personal and domestic occupations. Decided differences were found in the tendencies shown by native and by foreign-born children, and also by children from different for eign countries, toward various occupations. Owing, primarily, to a decidedly larger proportion of foreign-born than of native children who secured their first positions in clothing factories and other needle trades, the foreign-born children, especially the Italians, showed a greater tendency to begin their industrial careers in factory and mechanical occupations. This difference was particularly pro nounced among the girls. More than one-fifth, 21.8 per cent, of the foreign-born girls who took out certificates in the four cities—over one-third, 36.2 per cent, of those born in Italy and more than onesixth, 17.3 per cent, of those born in Russia— as compared with less than one-tenth, 9.2 per cent, of the native girls, began work as oper atives in clothing factories and other needle trades. The native children, on the other hand, showed a greater tendency than the foreign born to enter each of the occupations classed as cler ical, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods, except “ selling” and “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work.” Over one https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 35 -tenth, 11.1 per cent, of the first positions held by Italian children and 8.6 per cent of those held by Russian children involved selling, generally in small shops or from peddlers’ wagons. The Russian children appear to have been more like the native in their distribution between the two big occupation groups than were the Italian, but the reason was that a much larger proportion of Russian, 11.7 per cent, than of either native, 5.8 per cent, or Italian, 4.6 per cent, were first employed in packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work. The children who were born in England and Wales entered in general much the same occupations as the native children, and an even larger proportion of them were employed in cash and messenger work in department stores. Nevertheless, department stores furnished first positions for only 7."9 per cent of all the foreign-born children and 11.3 per cent of all the foreign-born girls, including those from Great Britain, as compared with more than one-eighth, 14.4 per cent, of the native children and nearly one-fourth, 23.8 per cent, of the native girls. Among the native children were included, however, many whose fathers were foreign born. These children tended to resemble in their choice of occupations those whose fathers also were native more closely than they resembled foreign-born children. Nevertheless, they distinctly tended to modify the tendencies shown by native children of native parentage. The contrast, therefore, between the foreign-horn children and the native children whose fathers also were native was in most cases even more pronounced than that between the foreign born and the entire group of native children. In general, too, the children whose fathers were foreign born of each special nationality showed the same tendency, though in lesser degree, as those who were themselves foreign born of the same nationality. These figures concerning the nationality of the fathers relate, of course, only to the interviewed children, all of whom were regular workers, whereas those given previously concerning the nativity of the children relate to all those who took out certificates, both vaca tion and regular workers. Only comparatively slight differences in occupational distribution were found, however, between the vacation and the regular workers who took out certificates in Boston. In spite of the fact that more of them were native born and that they were, as a rule, older and more advanced in school, the vacation workers appear to have been somewhat more likely to enter factory and mechanical occupations than the regular workers. The only occupa tion included in the group of clerical and other similar occupations which the vacation worker less frequently entered was messenger, errand, and delivery work. The greater tendency of vacation work ers to begin in factories appears to have been due primarily to a comparatively large proportion of girl vacation workers who began https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 36 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. their industrial lives as operatives in shoe factories. In clothing factories and other needle trades, as would be expected from the large proportion of foreign-born children employed, a smaller proportion of vacation than of regular workers secured their first positions. The differences in occupational distribution between the entire group of continuation-school children and those who were inter viewed, like those between the vacation and regular workers, were not great. Most of the conspicuous differences which occurred were in occupations in which, as will be seen later, the interviewed children were found to have held a considerable number of uncertificated positions. For example, 4.6 per cent of the positions held by the children interviewed, as compared with only 2.7 per cent of those held by the children in continuation school, were in personal and domestic occupations; and 9.5 per cent of those held by the children interviewed, as compared with only 7.2 per cent of those held by the children in continuation school, were as operatives in clothing fac tories and other needle trades. Evidently the chief differences were due to the fact that, in the records of the children interviewed, posi tions were included for which no certificates were secured. On the other hand, the fact that only 1.3 per cent of the positions held by the interviewed children, as compared with 2.1 per cent of those-held by the continuation-school children, were as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades is probably due to more accurate description during the interview of the actual work performed. Children who were behind in their school work showed a greater tendency than did normal or advanced children to enter factory and mechanical occupations, and also to take positions involving “ sell ing” or “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work,” and to enter personal and domestic occupations. In spite of the fact that the younger children showed less tendency than the older to begin work as factory operatives, it appears that, in general, the lower the grade a child had completed in school the more likely was he to begin his industrial career in such an occupation. Actual retardation seems, as would be expected, to have had the same effect. Over one-third, 35.5 per cent, of the regular positions held by retarded children, but little over one-fourth, 27.5 per cent, of those held by children from normal grades, and not much more than one-fifth, 21.8 per cent, of those held by children from grades higher than normal for their ages were for work as factory operatives. The only kind of work in which retarded, normal, and advanced children showed about the same tendency to begin their industrial lives was messenger, errand, and delivery work. Children from higher grades than normal for their ages showed, on the other hand, a decidedly greater tendency than other groups to go into offices and also into cash and messenger work in depart https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 37 ment stores. Nearly one-third, 32.1 per cent, of the advanced girls, as compared with little more than one-fourth, 27.1 per cent, of the normal and with less than one-sixth, 14.8 per cent, of the retarded girls, went into cash and messenger work in department stores. These differences in occupational distribution between normal and retarded children appear in the main to coincide with the differences already pointed out between the occupational tendencies of native and foreign-born children. A larger proportion of the foreign-bom than of the native children, for example, were retarded, and these children more frequently than the native secured factory positions. The children interviewed, w in constitute a fair sample of all, were not usually employed in positions involving work at or in connection with machines. In only about one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, of all the positions held by them was there any machine work and in many, if not most, of these the children were employed at machine work for only part of the time. Most of the machine work was in factory operative positions, and it was especially common in clothing factories and other needle trades. As girls much more frequently than boys worked in these positions, machine work was much more common 4n the positions held by girls than in those held by boys. Children not infrequently worked at more than one occupation in a position. When not needed for errands, for example, they were often assigned to some other occupation, its nature depending on the nature of their employers’ business. Frequently, too, children were transferred from the occupation for which they were hired to a different one not contemplated by the issuing officer or the examining physician when the certificate was made out. In over one-eighth, 13.5 per cent, of all the positions held by the children interviewed they were transferred to occupations different from those for which their certificates read. These occupational shifts were most likely to occur, however, in establishments employing a considerable number of children in similar occupations—-for example, in shoe factories— and, as a result, many of them did not involve changes to occupations of a different kind, so far as the classification adopted for this report is concerned. In little more than 1 position in 20, 5.6 per cent, were the children transferred to wholly different occupations. Shifts to occupations of other kinds than those for which the children were employed were most common in positions held by girls in messenger, errand, md delivery work and in “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work.” In nearly one-fourth, 23 per cent, of the former posi tions, and in about one-eighth, 12.9 per cent, of the latter, girls were so transferred. In these two general types of occupations, at least, promises of employment evidently constituted peculiarly weak evi dence as to what a girl might actually be expected to do. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 38 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Methods o f securing 'positions.— Few of these children— less than one-tenth, 9.3 per cent, of those in the continuation school and a still smaller proportion of those who were interviewed— secured their first positions through any agency engaged in the placement or vocational guidance of children. Of those who did make use of such an organization more than half were placed by private employment agencies. The Bòston Placement Bureau, which had offices in the building where the certificate office was located and on the same floor, worked mainly among high-school graduates and children over 16 years of age who were applying for educational certificates, and, as a result, secured first positions for only 54, or 1.6 per cent, of the 3,399 children in the Boston continuation school. The State em ployment office secured first positions for only 31" of these children. The day schools, most of which had vocational counsellors, but did not attempt to find positions, appear to have been more important as placement agencies than any other public organization; yet the fact that they secured first positions for only 2.1 per cent of the con tinuation school and 0.4 per cent of the children interviewed shows that their influence was slight and was mainly among the older boys and girls. The children who held more than one position appear, however, tjOhave been much more likely to use placement agencies of all kinds in securing their second than their first positions. Nearly twice as large a proportion of these children, 15.3 per cent as compared with 8.1 per cent, secured their second as secured their first positions through agencies of this sort. Even the day schools obtained more second than first positions, and the placement bureau increased from 1.5 per cent of first to 2.3 per cent of second positions. The greatest difference, however, was found, naturally, in the use made of the placement facilities of the continuation school where the children were enrolled after they had secured their first but before they had secured their second positions. Only three, or 0.2 per cent, of the children who held more than one position secured their first, but 84, or 4.4 per cent, secured their second positions through the continua tion school. Nevertheless, the continuation school at the time of this study was new and had as yet developed no systematic place ment work. It is not surprising to find, therefore, that only oneninth of the continuation-school children of the age group studied secured even their second positions through any form of placement agency other than private employment bureaus. Slightly over three-fourths, 76 per cent, of the children in the Boston continuation school, and an even larger proportion of those who were interviewed, stated that they had secured their first regular positions either independently or through friends or relatives. A https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 39 larger proportion of those who held more than one position secured their first positions independently, oftener through personal appli cation than through friends or relatives. About two-fifths, 40.2 per cent, stated that they had no assistance in finding their first places in the industrial world, as compared with 35.8 per cent who were assisted by friends or relatives. An even larger proportion of children who held more than one position secured their second than their first positions independently. A decrease of family influence is also shown in the smaller proportion who secured their second positions through relatives or who worked for relatives. On the other hand, as would be expected from the fact that the children’s previous in dustrial experiences must have opened up new associations, the in fluence of friends over the choice of second positions was greater than their influence over the choice of first positions. High-school children appear to have been much more likely than children from the grammar schools, and eighth-grade graduates than children from the lower grades, to secure their first positions through employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus. Not far from one-fifth, 18 per cent, of the children from high schools, and nearly one-tenth, 9.6 per cent, of the eighth-grade graduates made use of such agencies. At the same time native children, who constituted comparatively large proportions of all those from the higher grades, and particularly of those who had completed a year or more of highschool work, appear to have been much more likely than foreignborn children to secure their first positions through employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus. The children who had com pleted only the fourth or fifth grades, among whom the proportion of foreign born was comparatively high, rarely found their first po sitions through such agencies, but unusually large numbers of them were assisted by or went to work for relatives. As would be expected from the fact that the proportion of children from the higher grades who secured their first positions through placement agencies was so much higher than that of children from the lower grades, comparatively few, only 22.8 per cent, of the children who made use of such agencies were retarded. On the other hand, retarded children formed over two-fifths, 42.6 per cent, of those whose employers were relatives, and nearly one-third, 32.4 per cent, of those who secured their first positions through relatives, as com pared with only a little over one-fourth, 27.9 per cent, of those who secured their first positions through friends. The children who were assisted only by friends, as well as those who secured their positions through private employment agencies and through the placement bureau, seem to have been normal or advanced rather than retarded in their school work. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 40 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. To a certain extent at least the method of securing a position would doubtless influence the occupation; or, conversely, positions in certain occupations would be more likely than positions in others to be secured by certain methods. It is not surprising to find, for example, that a larger proportion of the positions for clerical and similar occupations than of those for factory and mechanical work were secured through some sort of employment agency. Office work and messenger, errand, and delivery-work positions were particularly apt to be secured through employment agencies, schools, or place ment bureaus. Positions for cash and messenger work in depart ment stores, on the other hand, were more often secured independ ently than by all other methods combined. A larger proportion of positions for factory and mechanical work than for clerical and other similar occupations were secured through friends or relatives, and also a larger proportion of the former than of the latter were secured independently. Considerable difference was found, however, be tween different kinds of factories. Thus, the children who began work in clothing factories and other needle trades, an unusually large proportion of whom were foreign bom, much more often secured their first positions through friends or relatives than did the children who began work in shoe factories. Length and number o f 'positions and 'anempZoymmi.-r-Considerable difference was found between occupations in the length of time dur ing which children remained in their positions. In studying this subject only the first regular positions held by children interviewed were considered, for later positions were too frequently not termi nated and the exact length of positions was not known for the other groups of children. The largest proportion of short-time positions was found in cash and messenger work in department stores. More than half, 51 per cent, of these positions, and not far from threefifths, 57.9 per cent, of those held by girls lasted less than one month. Positions as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades were also likely to be of short duration. Over two-fifths, 43.6 per cent, of these positions, and a still larger proportion, 45.7 per cent, of those held by girls lasted less than three months. ' More than half these clothing factory positions which were terminated within three months lasted, however, more than one month. Though the work in clothing factories is seasonal, the rush seasons are much longer than department store “ sales,” and this fact is evidently reflected in the comparative length of positions held in the two occupations. Shoe factories appear to have offered the steadiest work for opera tives. Considerably more than two-fifths, 43.7 per cent, of the shoe factory operative positions and nearly one-half, 48.3 per cent, of those entered by girls were held for a year or more. Doubtless, because girls preponderated in cash and messenger work in department stores and in work as operatives in clothing factories https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 41 and other needle trades, the positions held by girls generally lasted for shorter periods than those held by boys. Over two-fifths, 41 per cent, of all the first positions held by girls, as compared with less than one-third, 32.1 per cent, of those held by boys, lasted less than three months. Even children who had been at work only a short time before their sixteenth birthdays had often held a number of positions, but in general the longer the industrial histories the larger the proportion of children who had worked, for example, in as many as four different places. Of the children taking out certificates in the four cities who began work before they were 14£ years of age— that is, from 18 months to 2 years before their sixteenth birthdays—nearly one-third, 32.3 per cent, held only one certificate, and not far from one-fourth, 22.6 per cent, held four or more certificates. Fourteen of these children held 10 or more certificates. This group of children includes, however, many who worked only during vacation, and in such a group the proportion holding one position would naturally be larger, while that holding four or more positions would be smaller, than among children who had spent the whole 18 months to 2 years before their sixteenth birthdays as industrial workers. Of the contin uation-school children, all regular workers, who began at the same ages, less than one-fourth, 22.6 per cent, held only one certificate but not far from three-tenths, 28.1 per cent, held four or more certificates. Of the children interviewed, all regular workers, mot far from one fourth, 23.1 per cent, held only one position in a year or more of work history and were therefore classified as “ steady;” a somewhat larger proportion, 24.7 per cent, held on an average one position within each period of from six months to one year and were classified as active;' about one-third, 33.2 per cent, held new positions on an average within each period of from three to six months and were classified as “ restless;" and a comparatively small proportion, less than one-tenth, held new positions on an average within each period of less than three months and were classified as “ unsteady." In each of these groups of children girls held more positions on an average than did boys. Over one-fourth, 27.1 per cent, of the girls who took out certificates in the four cities, but less than one-fifth, 19.6 per cent, of the boys held four or more positions. The steady workers appear to have been decidedly less likely to be .arded in their school work than those who shifted their positions frequently. Of the continuation-school children who took out their first certificates before their fifteenth birthdays only about one-fourth, 25.5 per cent, of those who held only one position, but about twofifths, 40.6 per cent, of those who held four or more positions before 49470°— 22------ 4 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 42 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. they became 16, were retarded. In the group of children inter--' viewed the largest proportion of retarded children, about two-fifths, 39.9 per cent, was found among those classed as “ restless,” but nearly as large a proportion, 37.9 per cent, appeared among the considerably smaller number classed as “ unsteady.” On the other hand, only about one-fourth, 24.7 per cent, of the “ steady” workers had failed to attain a normal grade. Apparently children who were ' behind in their school work were more likely than were those from normal or higher than normal grades for their ages to make frequent changes in their positions after going to work. The figures in regard to unemployment relate only to the children interviewed, as the dates of termination of positions could not be determined accurately enough for the other groups of children. Moreover, only children who had been, at work one year or more are here considered, as those with shorter work histories may not have had a normal amount of unemployment. Among these children the proportion of unemployed time was 14.4 per cent. The boys alone had only about one-eighth, 12.4 per cent, of their time unemployed, but the percentage for the girls was much higher, 17. The order of nativity groups in amount of time unemployed was for girls exactly opposite to that for boys. Among native boys whose fathers also were native the percentage of unemployment was only 10.5, somewhat less than among native boys of foreign parentage, 12.6, and decidedly less than among foreign boys, 16.9. Among girls, on the other hand, the most favorable showing was made by those who were foreign born, with only 14.1 per cent of their time unemployed, and the next most favorable by the native girls whose fathers were foreign born, with 16.4 per cent of unemployed time. The highest percentage of unemployment for any sex and nativity group was 22.9 for the native girls whose fathers also were native. This peculiarity appears to be due to a greater tendency on the part of the native girls, and especially those of native parentage, to work only when they could secure the more attractive positions, for, as already shown, these girls more frequently than any other group tended to take temporary positions, especially for cash and messenger work in department stores, and were consequently out of work a great deal of the time. This tendency to take temporary work especially in department stores, is also probably the cause of the otherwise surprising fact that girls who had completed higher grades than normal for their ages had nearly twice as large a percentage of unemployment as boys of the same class, 19.8 as compared with 10. For boys the percentage of unemployment, like the number of positions held, was largest among those who were retarded, but for girls it was somewhat larger among those from higher than among those from lower grades than normal for their ages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 43 Another strange fact is that both the boys and the girls who were very much retarded— three or more grades below normal— had lower percentages of unemployment, the boys only 6.8 per cent and the girls 14.2 per cent, than any other groups of the same sex. This was probably due primarily to the fact that the much retarded children of both sexes were more likely to go to work in factories where shorttime positions were comparatively rare. The children who had held only one position within a year or more of work history— those called “ steady” workers—naturally had very little unemployment. Among these children the percentage of unem ployed time was almost negligible, only 2.7. Among the “ active” workers this percentage rose to 15.1, but it was more than doubled among the “ unsteady” workers, who were unemployed during more than one-third, 34.9 per cent, of their work histories. Even the “ restless” workers were unemployed for more than one-fifth, 21.9 per cent, of their time. All the different groups of girls showed higher percentages of unemployment than the corresponding groups of boys, but the difference was especially marked among the “ un steady” workers. It is interesting to note that although in this study of Boston ildren it was found that the girls on an average remained in. their first positions for shorter periods of time, held more positions within given periods, and had more unemployment— in a word, were less steady workers— than the boys, in a similar study of all the working children of Connecticut the exact reverse was found. The girls in that study remained in their first positions for longer periods of time, held fewer positions within given periods, and had less unemploy ment—in a word, were more steady workers than the boys.4 This difference appears to be due entirely, however, to differences in the occupations open to girls. In Boston, a typical commercial city, large numbers of girls, and much larger than of boys, were employed in cash and messenger work in department stores where, as already seen, a large proportion of the positions were temporary in character and of short duration. Not far from one-fourth, 23.4 per cent, of all the positions held by the Boston continuation-school girls, but only 7.1 per cent of those held by the boys, were for this occupation. In each different group of children studied girls held from three-fifths to three-fourths of all such positions. The Boston girls, therefore, were at a distinct disadvantage, as compared with the boys, in the matter of steadiness of employment. In Connecticut, 5ñ the other hand, only about one-sixth, 16.6 per cent, of the girls held first positions in any kind of “ trade,” including not only posi tions for cash and messenger work but for selling and for work of * Industrial Instability of Child Workers, U . S. Dept, of Labor, Children’s Bureau, Publication No. 74, Industrial Series, No. 5, pp. 18-30 passim. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 44 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. various kinds which in Boston would have been classified as “ mes-^ senger work,' errands, and delivery.” 5 At the same time more Con necticut boys than girls were employed in “ trade.” Evidently the Connecticut girls were not handicapped, as compared with the boys, by temporary positions in department stores. Furthermore, the clothing factories of Boston, which furnished about one-eighth, 12.7 per cent, of the positions held by girls and a very small proportion, only 0.6 per cent, of those held by boys, were largely engaged in the manufacture of outer garments and offered much seasonal work, whereas those of Connecticut were more com monly engaged in the manufacture of corsets and underwear and offered more steady work. On the other hand, textile factories, where in Connecticut the greatest steadiness in employment was found and which furnished over one-fourth, 26.5 per cent, of the first positions held by girls but only about one-sixth, 16.6 per cent, of those held by boys in that State, were of comparatively little impor tance in Boston, where they furnished only 3 per cent of all the positions held by both sexes. Though the numbers are small it is also worthy of remark that, in spite of their more frequent employ ment in seasonal work in clothing factories, Boston girls worked for longer periods than boys in their first regular positions as -factoiy operatives. Other illustrations of the differences in opportunities for steady work offered to girls and to boys in the city of Boston and in the State of Connecticut might be cited, if the positions held were all classified either upon an occupational or an industrial basis. This rough comparison is sufficient, however, to show that the greater steadiness of boys in Boston and of girls in Connecticut is due to differences in industrial opportunities open to the two sexes in a commercial city like Boston and in a manufacturing State like Connecticut. Wages and earnings.— Not far from three-fourths, 73.5 per cent, of the children interviewed received less than $5 initial weekly wages in their first regular positions. As only 5.1 per cent made less than $3, the initial weekly wages of the great majority, 68.4 per cent, were from $3 to $5. Wages of from $4 to $5 were more common than those of from $3 to $4. The latter amounts were received by little more than one-fourth, 26.5 per cent, and the former b y over twofifths, 41.9 per cent, of the children. The initial weekly wages of the boys were decidedly higher than those of the girls. Nearly one-half, 48.6 per cent, of the boys but only about one-third, 32.7 per cent, of the girls earned $4 but less than $5, while about one-fifth, 20.3 per cent, of the boys and only 6 The material available for the Connecticut study m ade possible only an industrial, and not an occu pational, classification. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 45 one-twentieth, 5.2 per cent, of the girls earned $5 but less than $6. Less than $3 weekly wages were-received by about one-twelfth, 8.7 per cent, of the girls, but by only 2.5 per cent of the boys. Foreign-bom children, both boys and girls, appear to have received higher initial weekly wages than native children of either native or foreign-bom fathers. Not far from one-third, 31.6 per cent, of the foreign-born boys earned $5 or more, as compared with less than one-fourth of the native sons of native and of foreign-bom fathers, 23.6 per cent and 23.4 per cent, respectively. This appears to have been due m part to the fact that foreign-bom children, particularly boys, much more frequently worked long hours— that is, over 48 a week— than did children of any other nativity group. In part, as will be seen later, it appears to have been due to higher wages in factory and -mechanical occupations in which, as already noted oreign-born children showed a greater tendency than native to engage. Higher initial weekly wages were received by children who went to work during the summer vacation than by those who went to work at any other time, by children who left school for other than economic reasons than by those who left school for economic reasons, and by c^ldren who secured their first regular positions through friends or relatives than by those who secured them independently or through employment bureaus or placement agencies. Advancement-in school work and employment before leaving school also seem to have exercised a favorable influence over the children's initial weekly wages in their first regular positions. Not far from one-fourth, 22.1 per cent, of the children from higher than normal grades for their ages received $5 or more, as compared with about one-sixth, 16.4 per cent, of those from normal grades and with an even smaller proportion of the retarded children. The same tendency was shown by both boys and girls. The advantage of children who had worked before leaving school was even more pronounced. Over one-fourth, 25.9 per cent, of these children, as compared with little more than one-tenth, 11.2 per cent, of those who had not worked before leaving school, received initial weekly wages of $5 or more. Nor was this due to the preponderance of boys with their higher wages among the children who had worked before leaving school for the boys alone showed the same tendency. Wages in factory and mechanical occupations were higher for both boys and girls than in clerical and other similar occupations. In art, at least, because of comparatively high wages received b y bovs as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades, over two-fifths, 41.8 per cent, of the positions held by boys in the entire group of factory and mechanical occupations paid initial weekly wages of $5 or more. Although girls received these wages in only about one-sixth, 16.8 per https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 46 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. cent, of their positions in factory and mechanical occupations, this proportion was higher than for their positions in clerical and other similar occupations, which was less than one-tenth, 9 per cent. The difference between these two main groups of occupations was due primarily to the unusually low wages received by both sexes, but particularly by girls, in positions for cash and messenger work in department stores. The most frequent wages for this occupation were $3 but less than $4, and less than $5 a week was received in not far from nine-tenths, 87.8 per cent, of all these positions and in over nine-tenths, 91.8 per cent, of those held b y girls. Office work showed the highest proportion of positions in which the initial weekly wages were $5 or more, but the positions held b y boys in messenger, errand, and delivery work, like those in cash and messenger work in depart ment stores, carried lower wages than positions in the entire group of clerical and other similar occupations. Piecework was particularly common in factory and mechanical occupations, and, although in general wages were lower in piece than in time work positions, girls appear to have earned the higher rates of wages more often when engaged in piecework. Children were paid by the piece in only about one-eighth, 12.6 per cent, of all their positions, but in about one-third, 33.2 per cent, of thoseT factory and mechanical occupations, and in nearly three-fifths, 59.8 per cent, of those in shoe factories alone. The only other type of occupation in which any considerable proportion of positions involved piecework was “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room w ork /’ and in less than one-sixth, 15.4 per cent, of these positions were the children paid by the piece. For both sexes combined, the initial weekly wages were decidedly higher in time work than in piecework positions. Nevertheless, girls, who held nearly seventenths, 69.3 per cent, of all the piecework positions, received wages of $4 or more in 54.5 per cent of their piecework, as compared with only 49.6 per cent of their timework positions, and $6 or more in 7.7 per cent of their piecework, as compared with only 3.3 per cent of their timework positions. Initial weekly wages do not represent the rate of compensation received by these children during the whole of the period before their sixteenth birthdays, for in two-fifths, 40.5 per cent, of all the timework positions held for three months or more their wages were raised, and in over one-fourth, 28.6 per cent, the increases amounted to $ 1 or more a week. Although office work was, for boys, the occupa-^ tion which showed the largest proportion, 52.8 per cent, of positions i which wages were increased, in general the children appear to have been most likely to receive increases in the occupations in which their initial wages were lowest. Thus both boys and girls received wage increases in a larger proportion of positions in clerical and other https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 47 similar occupations than in factory and mechanical occupations. Girls also received a larger proportion of increases which amounted to $1 or more in clerical occupations, but for boys the larger pro portion of such increases was found in factory and mechanical occupations. In 43.4 per cent of the positions held b y boys for messenger, errand, and delivery work the wages were increased, but in only 29.5 per cent of them did the increase amount to $1 or more. Girls received increases in a larger proportion, 60.8 per cent, of their positions which lasted three months or longer for cash and messenger work in department stores than in any other occupation, and in almost one-half, 49 per cent, of these positions the increase amounted to $1 or more. Evidently the girls who secured fairly permanent positions in this occupation fared better than would be indicated b y the low initial wages paid in their first positions. Both because of increases in particular positions and because of changes in positions, before the date of the interview many of the children were earning more than in their first regular positions. Of those who had been at work for a year or more, the great majority, 69.4 per cent, were receiving higher, and a very small proportion, only 5.9 per cent, lower wages when interviewed than when they began work. In the majority of cases their increases amounted to less than $2, the largest number being in the group $1 but less than $2. Twenty children had received increases of $4 or more. The proportion of girls whose wages had increased was nearly as high as that of boys, and the porportion who had received increases of $2 or more was higher. Nevertheless, decreases occurred in the wages of a larger proportion of girls than of boys. Although the foreign-born children had the advantage in initial weekly wages, in wage promotions they appear to have been not so well off as the native children, and particularly as the native children of native parentage. Increases of $2 or more were received by less than one-fourth, 23.1 per cent, of the foreign-born children, but by more than one-fourth, 27.9 per cent, of the native children whose fathers were foreign born and b y about three-tenths, 30.1 per cent, of those whose fathers also were native. A t the same time decreases in wages were reported b y 7.7 per cent of the foreignborn children but b y only 5.5 per cent of the native children whose fathers were foreign born and 4.9 per cent of those whose fathers also were native. Retardation appears to have exercised an unfavorable influence, not only over initial weekly wages, but also over wage increases. Only about three-fifths, 59.1 per cent, of the retarded children, as compared with not far from three-fourths, 72.7 per cent, of the children from normal grades and with more than three-fourths, 77.7 per cent, of those from higher grades than normal for their ages, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 48 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. received increases in wages between their first regular positions and the date of the interview. Moreover, the increase amounted to $2“ or more for only about one-fifth, 19.9 per cent, of the retarded children, as compared with three-tenths, 30.2 per cent, of the children from normal grades and with an even larger proportion, 31.3 per cent, of those from higher grades than normal for their ages. The figures for wage increases in connection with average duration of positions seem to indicate that frequent changes are not desirable. The “ steady” workers, it was found, were more likely than any other group of children to receive increases. Over three-fourths, 76.4 per cent, of the children classed as “ steady,” as compared with only 68.5 per cent of those classed as “ active” and 65.4 per cent of those classed as ‘ ‘ restless,” received wage increases. The increases received by the “ steady” workers were also, in general, more substantial than those of other children. Increases of $2 or more were reported by 30.4 per cent of the “ steady,” by 29 per cent of the “ active,” and by 24.2 per cent of the “ restless” children. Although these larger proportions of wage increases and of fairly substantial increases among the “ steady” workers may have been due in part to the fact already shown that these children were less frequently than any other group retarded in their school studies, it appears probable at least that the children who change their positions frequently are n b f the ones who secure most rapid advancement in wages. The average monthly earnings, which depend not only upon weekly wages and increases in weekly wages but also upon amount of unem ployment, differed for children who had been at work more, and for those who had been at work less, than one year. For those who had ' been at work for a year or more the average monthly earnings of both sexes were $16.68, slightly higher than for the children with shorter work histories, $16.62. Although the difference amounted to only 6 cents, the children with the longer work histories had more unem ployment and would, therefore, be expected to show lower earnings, so that even this slight difference appears to suggest again that the wages of children tend to rise slightly with increased industrial experi ence. Many of the children whose industrial histories had lasted less than a year, however, had been at work for too short periods to have had typical percentages of unemployment and, therefore, typical average earnings, and for that reason the following discussion relates only to those who had been at work for a year or more. The boys, as would be expected from their higher initial weekly wages and their lower percentage of unemployment, had larger monthly earning'than the girls, $17.90, as compared with $15.06. But the higher initial, wages of foreign-born boys were not sufficient to counter balance their comparative failure to secure wage advances and their high percentage, 16.9 per cent, of unemployment. The highest aver- https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 49 age monthly earnings, therefore, $18.44, were received by the native boys whose fathers also were native. The native girls of native parent age, on the other hand, who were unemployed not far from onefourth, 22.9 per cent, of their tune, received lower average monthlv earnings, $13.98, than the girls of any other group. The children who had completed normal grades for their ages, owing to their higher initial wages, their greater success in obtaining increases, and their smaller amount of unemployment, received decidedly higher average monthly earnings than did the retarded children, $17.24, as compared with $15.35, and for the same reasons the advanced children received slightly higher monthly earnings, $17.34, than did the normal children. The boys of these different groups showed the same tendency as both sexes combined, but the girls from higher grades than normal had such a large amount of unemployment, due to their selection of occupations, that their aver age monthly earnings, $14.11, fell behind those of the girls from normal grades, $15.87, and were only a trifle higher than those of retarded girls, $14.07. The tendency already noted for wages to rise with increased indus trial experience was found mainly among children who were advanced in their school work, though also to a certain extent among those from normal grades. The retarded children, on the other hand, showed exactly the opposite tendency—for wages to fall with increased indus trial experience. In spite of a markedly unfavorable percentage of unemployment, the average monthly earnings of children from higher grades than normal who had been at work for a year or more were $1.20 more than those of the same class of children who had been at work less than a year. Even for children from normal grades, with only a comparatively slight disadvantage in the matter of unem ployment, a difference in earnings of 21 cents in favor of the children with longer work histories was found. But the average monthly earnings of retarded children who had been at work for one year or more were actually 70 cents lower than those of retarded children who had been at work less than one year, though the difference in amount of unemployment was smaller than for any other group of children. Decided differences in average monthly earnings corresponding to those in percentages of time unemployed were found between “ steady,” “ active,” “ restless,” and “ unsteady” workers. For exam ple, the “ steady” workers made nearly twice as much, $19.54, on an perage, as the “ unsteady” workers, $10.71. Less difference was ound among the boys, but the average monthly earnings of the “ steady” girls were $18.15, as compared with only $7.30 earned by the “ unsteady” girls. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 50 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Hours o f labors—In more than three-fourths, 76.9 per cent, of their positions the children interviewed worked either between 36 and 41 or exactly 48 hours a week. In nearly two-fifths, 39.1 per cent, they worked exactly 48.hours. The hours in most occupations were for a large majority of the children from 36 to 48, inclusive, and these may therefore be' considered to be the customary hours for both boys and girls. For both sexes, moreover, the hours in the last positions held appear to have been much more likely to be within these limits than those in the first positions. Not only did children work over 48 hours but they also worked less than 36 hours, in a smaller proportion of last than of first positions. The hours in factory and mechanical occupations were more often than in clerical and similar occupations either from 36 to 48 or exactly 48 a week. These two groups together included more than four-fifths, 83.5 per cent, of all the positions in factory and mechanical occupations, and over nine-tenths, 92.9 per cent, of those in shoe factories. In not far from two-thirds, 64.3 per cent, of the shoe factory positions the hours were exactly 48 a week. In less than three-fourths, 74.1 per cent, of the positions in clothing factories and other needle trades, on the other hand, were the hours from 36 to 48, inclusive, and in little over one-fifth, 21.1 per cent, were they exactly.. 48. Although a somewhat smaller proportion of the positions in clothing factories and other needle trades than of those in the entire group of clerical and other similar- occupations required from 36 to 48 hours, inclusive, the special occupations included in the latter group showed wide variations. Thus in cash and messenger work in department stores the hours were either between 36 and 48 or exactly 48 in more than nine-tenths, 92.5 per cent, of all positions, while in messenger, errand, and delivery work these were the weekly hours in less than three-fourths, 73.3 per cent, of all positions. Positions with unusual hours— that is, with hours of either less than 36 or more than 48 a week— were most common in proportion to the number of positions in personal and domestic occupations. Much the largest number of such positions, however, was found in messenger, errand, and delivery work, and the next largest in work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. In nearly half, 49.4 per cent, of all positions in personal and domestic occupa tions, and in over one-half, 51.1 per cent, of those held by girls, the weekly hours were either less than 36 or more than 48. Nevertheless, of the 84 positions in which the children worked less than 36 hours a week, or less than the six hours a day required by law for exempt« from school attendance, only 13 were in personal and domesti; occupations as compared with 37 in messenger, errand, and delivery work. And of the 297 positions in which the children worked more than 48 hours a week, or more than the hours permitted by law in https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 51 ^most occupations, only 31 were in personal and domestic occupations, as compared with 147 in messenger, errand, and delivery work, and 39 in clothing factories and needle trades. About one-fifth of the positions in each of these two latter occupations, 19.5 per cent of the messenger, errand, and delivery work positions and 21.1 per cent of the clothing factory and other needle trades positions required more than 48 hours’ work a week. The hours of girls, doubtless because of the occupations entered, appear to have been much more frequently than those of boys either from 36 to 48 or 48 a week. On the other hand, the hours were less than 36 in a larger proportion and more than 48 in a decidedly larger proportion, of the positions held by boys than of those held by girls. The fact that foreign-born boys worked long hours— that is, over 48 a week— much more frequently than the boys of any other nativity group may account for their comparatively high initial weekly wages. In more than one-fourth, 27.5 per cent, of all their positions the hours were over 48, as compared with about one-sixth, 17.4 per cent, of the positions held by the native sons of foreign-born fathers and with only about one-eighth, 13.6 per cent, of those held by the ''native sons of native fathers. The conclusion that this greater tendency to take positions with long hours of labor is the true explanation of the high wages of the foreign-born boys appears to be confirmed by the fact that, in general, the higher rates of wages were found to have been paid in positions involving long hours and the lower rates in positions involving com paratively short hours. In nearly one-fourth, 23.1 per cent, of the positions in which boys received initial weekly wages of $5 or more, but in only about one-sixth, 16.4 per cent, of those in which their initial weekly wages were less than $5, were their hours over 48 a week. The wages of the girls, like those of the boys, were distinctly affected by their hours, and in the same way. Reasons fo r leaving 'positions.—As the information obtained from the children who were interviewed in regard to their reasons for leaving positions is probably more accurate than that obtained from the continuation-school records, only the figures for the interviewed children are here used. Even for this group it should be remem bered that the figures probably understate the number of cases of “ lay offs,” because children would be more likely to state that they had left because of dissatisfaction when actually they had been dis charged, than to state that they had been discharged when they had actually left because they were dissatisfied with their positions. Moreover, the group of children interviewed, primarily because they were all at work on the date of the interview, contains an abnormally small proportion of children who left positions in order to return to school. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 52 TH E W ORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. More positions were left because children were “ laid off” than because they were dissatisfied with their positions, 42.5 per cent as compared with 37.8 per cent. For the girls alone the difference was even greater; practically one-half, 49.5 per cent, of the positions held by girls, as compared with little more than one-third, 36.8 per cent, of those held by boys, ended with a “ lay off.” Probably a considerable majority of these discharges, however, were not due to any fa’ult on the part of the children but solely to the character of the industries in which they were employed. All three of the occupations in which over two-fifths of the terminated positions held by both sexes ended in discharge were more or less seasonal in character; and in all three, girls were more commonly employed than boys. These three occupations were work as oper atives in clothing factories and other needle trades, “ packing, wrap ping, labeling, and shipping-room work,” and cash and messenger work in department stores. The latter occupation, in which girls held about three-fourths of all the positions, was mainly responsible for their higher proportion of “ lay offs.” In this occupation not far from seven-eighths, 85.5 per cent, of all positions, and nearly nine-tenths, 89.7 per cent, of those held by girls, ended with a “ lay off.” Discharges because the work was temporary, business was dull, or for some unassigned reason accounted, moreover, for the termination of over one-half, 50.4 per cent, of the positions left by native girls of native parentage— who were most commonly employed in cash and messenger work in department stores— as compared with only 38.3 per cent of those left by native girls whose fathers were foreign born and by an even smaller proportion, 29.5 per cent, of those left by foreign-born girls. Although native boys whose fathers were foreignborn were more frequently “ laid off” for these reasons than any other group of boys, even for them the proportion of positions, 25.1 per cent, terminated in this way was less than for any group of girls. Owing to the large number of positions from which girls were “ laid o ff” all other reasons were naturally given less frequently by them than by boys. Thus dissatisfaction with their positions was the reason given for the termination of about two-fifths, 40.6 per cent, of the positions held by boys but less than one-third, 31.9 per cent, of those held by girls. Dissatisfaction was not only the chief reason for leaving positions for messenger, errand, and delivery work, but also for leaving places in personal and domestic occupations and in shoe factories. Moreover, the differences were found to be s pronounced between the proportion of positions left by boys and that left by girls because of too hard work or too long hours, 7.9 per cent as compared with 4.6 per cent, that it appears probable that the boys, doubtless because they were more frequently employed for long https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 53 vhours and at heavy work, tended actually to leave positions because of excessive physical demands more often than did the girls. The boys, moreover, appear to have been ihuch more successful than the girls in securing new positions before leaving their old ones. As would be expected from their choice of occupations, the girls who had completed higher grades than normal for their ages were more likely to be “ laid o ff” than any other group, and those from normal grades were more likely to be “ laid off” than those who were retarded. Considerably more than one-half, 55.3 per cent, of the positions held by advanced girls, as compared with 53.6 per cent of those held by normal girls and with only 37.9 of those held by re tarded girls, were terminated for this reason. Retarded boys, on the other hand, were “ laid off” in a larger proportion of cases, 37.4 per cent, than advanced boys, 36.6 per cent, or than normal boys, 34.5 per cent. As retarded children received lower initial wages and fewer wage advances than normal or advanced children, it, is not surprising to find that they more frequently left positions because of low wages. Not far from one-eighth, 11.5 per cent, of the positions left by retarded children, as compared with only 4 per cent of those left b y advanced and 6.2 per cent of those left by normal children, were terminated for this reason. In the matter of “ lay offs,” as in amount of unemployment, num ber of wage increases, and average monthly earnings, the steadier workers appear to have been more fortunate than those who shifted their positions frequently, and the more frequent the shift the larger the proportion of cases in which the children were “ laid off.” So many positions held by children classified as “ steady” had not been terminated by the date of the interview that no comparison can be made for this group. But the proportion of terminated positions from which “ active” workers were “ laid off” was only 37.2 per cent, as compared with 41.3 per cent for “ restless” and 45.3 per cent for “ unsteady” workers. At the same time at least a partial explana tion for differences in amounts of unemployment is found in the fact that, before leaving their old positions, “ active” workers much more frequently than “ restless” workers, and the latter than “ unsteady” workers, secured new places which they believed, at least, to be better. Sickness and accidents.— At the time of this study the physical exam ination given children applying for certificates in Boston rarely resulted in the refusal of a certificate, and in this examination and certification little attention was paid to the occupation in which the child was to be employed. Moreover, the records of the physical examinations which had been given the children studied were too https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 54 TH E WOKKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. incomplete to use as a basis for any statistical statement. Every child interviewed was questioned, however, in regard to all cases of sickness or accident which had occurred to him between the time he took his first regular position and the date of the interview, and the records of the Massachusetts Accident Board were searched for re-, ports of accidents to these children. The information given by the children has, of course, no medical value and is probably not even complete. Nevertheless, from these two sources a rough estimate, at least, could be obtained of the number of cases of sickness or acci dent and the amount of time which they caused the children to lose from work. At least one case of sickness since leaving school for work was reported by more than one-third, 36 per cent, of the children inter viewed. A larger proportion of the girls than of the boys, 37.9 per cent, as compared with 34.6 per cent, reported sickness. All four of the children who reported three cases each and 21 of the 34 who each reported two cases of sickness were girls. Less than three-fourths, 71.3 per cent, of- the children who reported sickness, however, stated that they had lost time on account of it, and a smaller proportion of the cases among girls than among boys, 66.9 per cent, as com pared with 75.3 per cent, resulted in loss of time from work. A caseof sickness during a period of unemployment, it should be noted, was not classified as having caused loss of time from work even though it may have delayed the child in securing a new position. Accidents were not so common as was sickness. Nevertheless, nearly 1 child out of every 12, 8 per cent, had suffered some accident, either in the course of his work or otherwise, since taking his first regular position. Although the boys, as has been seen, did not so often suffer from sickness as did the girls, they appear to have been decidedly more liable to accidents. Less than one-twentieth, 4.3 per cent, of the girls, but more than one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, of the boys, reported some accident. Moreover, two boys and one girl reported three or more, and three boys and one girl reported two accidents each. Almost two-thirds of these accidents, and about the same proportion for girls as for boys resulted in loss of time from work. Sixty accidents, about seven-tenths of the entire number, occurred while the children were at work. Of the accidents which occurred to boys alone, however, only about 6 in every 10 occurred during the course of employment. Probably because of the fact already shown that girls more often than boys were employed in machine work, most of their accidents, but only a few of those to boys, were cause by machinery. On the other hand, the more frequent employment of boys in messenger, errand, and delivery work is reflected in the fact that nine of their accidents, but none of those to girls, were caused by elevators or vehicles. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 55 The amount of time lost from work on account of both sickness and accident was small as compared with the amount lost on account of unemployment. The children who had been at work for one year or more lost through sickness or accident 2.6 per cent of their working time— the girls more than the boys, 3 per cent as compared with 2.4 per cent. This does not mean, however, that these children were in good health during all the rest of the time between leaving school and the date of the interview. Not only were some of the illnesses and accidents from which the children suffered too trivial to cause absence from work, but no sickness or accident which occurred during a period of unemployment was considered to have caused loss of time from work even though it may have prevented the child from securing another position promptly. Violations o f law.— The story of child labor in Boston presented in this report, except for the work of interviewed children before leaving school, covers a period of three years, at the very beginning of which there went into effect a series of acts not only establishing higher standards for child labor but making important changes in the employment certificate system and reorganizing completely the labor law enforcement machinery of the State of Massachusetts. Tiese three years include a period during which employers, parents, and children had to be educated to an understanding of a new law which required that employment certificates be secured for each separate position, that the hours of children be limited to eight a day, and that working children attend continuation school. This educa tion, too,* had to be given mainly by an agency which was itself in process of organization and which had many other heavy respon sibilities. These conditions, as well as the fact that the information as to violations rests entirely upon the xmverifiable statements of the children, should be considered in connection with the cases of viola tion of child-labor laws discovered in the course of this study. At the same time it should be remembered that for many years certi ficates of some sort had been required in Massachusetts for the employment of children, and that in many, if not most, occupations their hours had been limited to 10 a day and 54 or 58 a week. More over, not only did there seem no reason to doubt that in most instances the child’s statement was substantially correct but in case of the slightest doubt the work was classified as legal. The figures, there fore, include only definitely reported violations of some provision of *law. Failure to comply with the provisions of the child-labor law were particularly common in positions held before the children left school for work. About three-fifths, 60.8 per cent, of the children who worked before leaving school had violated one or more of the pro https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 56 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. visions of the child-labor or the compulsory-school-attendance law i one or more of their school positions. Many of these positions, more over, were held before September 1 , 1913, and in these cases the law violated was not the new one of that year but the older law with its lower standards. Perhaps, in part, because a larger proportion of the girls were over 14 before they took their first school positions, fewer of them than of the boys, only 38.6 per cent as compared wdth 64.3 per cent, were employed in violation of the law in positions held before leaving school. Both “ factory and mechanical” and “ clerical and similar” occu pations showed higher proportions of school positions in which viola tions of law occurred than their proportions of all school positions. The difference was greatest in messenger, errand, and delivery work, which accounted for less than half, 47.6 per cent, of all school positions but for nearly three-fourths, 74.5 per cent, of those in which violations occurred. In domestic service, on the other hand, no legal restric tion except that of the compulsory-school-attendance law existed, while in some of the other occupations included under personal and domestic occupations— for example, bootblacking— the standards of legal protection for children were comparatively low. Because of this comparative lack of law, violations were rare in the entire group of personal and domestic occupations. In many school positions more than one violation occurred. Thus, though violations were found in only 235 positions, in 71 there were two violations, in 32 three, and in 5 four, so that in all 385 violations of different kinds were counted. Employment under legal age was the most common and accounted for about two-fifths, 40.3 per cent of the entire number. Next came night work, which accounted for not far from one-third, 31.9 per cent. Both these were especially common in messenger, errand, and delivery work, in which boys were often employed as delivery boys for small stores and as peddlers’ helpers on Saturdays and after school hours. About oneeighth, 11.9 per cent, of all the violations consisted in failure to obtain employment certificates, and in most of the other cases, 14.8 per cent of the entire number, the children worked too long hours. In only 3 cases did they report that they had been employed during school hours. Even in their regular positions practically one-half, 4 9 .8 per cent, of the children were employed at some time in violation of some pro vision of the child-labor law 5 and, as in the case of school position", a considerably larger proportion of boys than of girls, 5 7 .7 per cent as compared with 39 per cent, were illegally employed. It was found, too, that illegal employment was somewhat more common among foreign-born children than among native children of foreign-born fathers, and decidedly more so than among native children of native fathers. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 57 Children who had worked before leaving school and those who were retarded in their school work were both especially prone to violate the child-labor law in one or another of the positions which they held after leaving school. About three-fifths, 60.7 per cent, of the boys who had worked before leaving school, as compared with 53.3 per cent of those who had not, were illegally employed in some regular position. Among the girls, however, a somewhat larger pro portion of those who had not worked were illegally employed. The proportion of retarded children who violated the child-labor law in one or another of their regular positions was considerably over half, 55.4 per cent, while that of children from normal grades was decidedly less than half, 46.2 per cent. Owing entirely, however, to a greater tendency of boys from higher grades than normal to work illegally, the proportion of advanced children who violated the child-labor law was higher than that of normal children, 49.3 per cent. Certification violations.—Although only 1 child in every 20, 5 per cent, had worked in a first regular position without the certificate required by law, more than 1 in every 8, 13.6 per cent, had worked illegally without a certificate in at least one position before the date of the interview. Evidently the children were more likely to violate die law in this way in later than in first positions1—a fact which suggests that some, at least, of these violations may have been due to lack of familiarity with the new law which required a separate certificate for each different position. In this connection it should be noted also that the foreign-born children— among whom and among the employers of whom knowledge of the requirements of the new law would be likely to spread most slowly— though least likely to work without certificates in their first regular positions, were most likely to work without certificates in later positions. The largest proportion of children who held one or more illegally uncertificated positions was found, too, among the children of foreign-born fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities, and specifically among the children of Russian Jewish fathers. Of all the children of foreignbom fathers the Irish showed the smallest proportion who held such positions. The preceding figures relate only to positions for which certificates were never secured. Often, however, in positions for which certifi cates were eventually secured they were not taken out until the children had been at work for some time. For instance, about onetenth, 9.4 per cent, of the children did not take out certificates for iheir first regular positions until they had been at work more than 10 days. In many cases these children may have been found at work by school-attendance officers or factory inspectors who ordered that they secffrfe employment certificates or be discharged. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 5 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 58 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Late certification, unlike failure ever to secure a certificate, was^ most common among native children of native fathers and least common among foreign-born children. This was due entirely, how ever, to the greater frequency of late certification among native boys of native parentage. Both failure to secure certificates required by law and late cer tification in first regular positions were decidedly more common among children who went to work during the summer vacation than among those who went to work at any other time. Of the children who went to work during a summer vacation 8 per cent were illegally not certificated and 17.9 per cent were certificated late, while of those who went to work at some other time only 3.8 per cent were illegally not certificated and 6.2 per cent were certificated late. In both cases the difference was more pronounced among the boys. More than one-third, 36.4 per cent, of the boys who went to work during the summer vacation, as compared with only about one-ninth, 11.3 per cent, of those who went to work during the school year, were either illegally not certificated or certificated late. The children from normal and higher than normal grades for their ages, in part probably because of their greater tendency to go to work during the summer vacation and in part because of the occupa-* tions they entered, were more likely than the retarded children both to work illegally without certificates and to be certificated late in their first regular positions. One or the other violation of the employ ment certificate law was found in the first regular positions held by nearly one-fifth, 19.1 per cent, of the advanced children and by over one-sixth, 16.9 per cent, of the normal children, but by only about one-twelfth, 8.6 per cent, of the retarded children. The tendency of children from higher grades than normal more frequently than those from normal grades to violate the certificate law was due entirely to the boys; but both normal girls and normal boys showed a greater tendency than did retarded girls and retarded boys to be illegally not certificated or certificated late in their first regular positions. Perhaps because so many of them had already violated the childlabor law without difficulty, the children who had worked before leaving school were more likely to be employed without certificates in their first regular positions than were those who were going into industry for the first time. Moreover, the children who had worked before leaving school were decidedly more likely to neglect to secure certificates until after they had been employed for more than a week. Although the method of obtaining positions seems to have hac much less influence than the occupation entered over whether or not certificates were secured, it is interesting to note that both illegal failure to secure certificates and failure to seeure them on time were particularly common in positions obtained through private https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis LNTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 59 .employment agencies. This was probably due, however, to the character of the positions filled by such agencies. The employer is primarily responsible for having a certificate on file for the child. It is upon him, and not upon the child, that the penalties of the labor law fall in case of violation. In positions, therefore, in which the employer understands the legal requirements and is careful to obey them a child is not likely to work in violation of the certificate law. These positions, moreover, are most likely to be found in establish ments where a number of children are employed and where, conse quently, some system of employment and of keeping certificates has been developed. Violations of the certificate law, on the other hand, are most likely to occur in positions where the employer hires, more or less casually, only a single child. Because of the prevailing number of children working for. a single employer in the different kinds of positions it is not surprising to, find that in factory and mechanical occupations the children were either illegally not certificated or certificated late in only one-ninth, 11.1 per cent, of all their positions, whereas in personal and domestic occupations they violated the certificate law in over two-fifths, 43.8 per cent, and even in office work in not far from one-fourth, "23.8 per cent, of their positions. Nor is it surprising to find a con siderable variation in the different occupations classified as factory and mechanical. In only 2.5 per cent of the shoe factory positions, for example, was the certificate law violated, but violations occurred in 17.8 per cent of all the positions in clothing factories and other needle trades, an industry in which the establishments were decidedly smaller. The greater frequency with which girls complied with the require ments of the certificate law, both by securing certificates and by securing them promptly, is accounted for 4n part, but not wholly, by their more frequent employment in the occupations, especially factory and mechanical occupations, in which more than one child were commonly employed in an establishment and in which the em ployers were most likely to be familiar with the law. Of the factory operative positions precisely the same proportion, 4.3 per cent, of those held by girls as of those held by boys were illegally not certifi cated, and precisely the same proportion, 5.7 per cent, were certifi cated late. Nevertheless, in the occupation in which the largest number of boys was employed— messenger, errand, and delivery work both lack of certification and late certification were more common in positions held by boys than in those held by girls; and in all positions for cash and messenger work in department stores, although only five such violations were found, three of these five positions were held by boys. It appears probable, therefore, either that girls were more careful to secure certificates or that employers were more careful to demand them for girls, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 60 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Hour violations.— Five provisions of law, one of the school-at tendance law and four of the labor law, related to hours of labor. A child could work too short hours, less than 6 a day or 36 a week, while school was in session; such short hours did not legally entitle him to exemption from school attendance. On the other hand, he could work too long hours, either b y the day or b y the week; and he could be employed at night or 7 days a week. Each kind of violation could occur in combination with other kinds. One or more of these five legal provisions as to hours were broken in over one-fifth, 21.2 per cent, of all the positions held by the children interviewed. Moreover, violations did not usually occur singly. In about three-fourths of all the positions in which any violation occurred more than one provision of the law were broken; and in over one-fourth three or four provisions were broken. In four cases children were employed in violation of all four provisions of the labor law, too long hours a day and a week, at night, and 7 days a week. The most common violation was too long daily hours, and the next was too long weekly hours. In over one-sixth, 17.5 per cent, of all the positions held, the provisions of law relating to daily hours were violated, and in about one-seventh, 14.2 per cent, those relating to weekly hours were violated. Usually too long daily hours meant also too long weekly hours. In over three-fourths, 78.3 per cent, of the positions in which a violation of daily hours was found one of weekly hours was also found. Moreover, too long weekly hours rarely— in only nine cases— occurred except in connection with too long daily hours. Frequently, too, when children were employed too long daily or weekly hours, or both, they were also employed at night, and occasionally they were required to work 7 days a week. In about 1 position in 12, 8.4 per cent, the children were employed in violation of the night work provision, but in only about 1 in 100 were they employed in violation of the 7-day provision of the law. In a few positions— about 1 in 50— they worked less than the 6 hours a day or 36 a week required for exemption from school attend ance, and in some of these cases too short weekly hours were com bined with too long daily hours or too short daily or weekly hours with night work. In 36 positions, also, about 1 in every 50, although no violation was found because the law limiting hours did not apply to the par ticular occupations, the hours were excessive— that is, longer than permitted by the law in occupations which it covered. Most qJ held by girls. Boys were much more frequently employed in violation of the provisions of law relating to hours of labor than were girls. Viola tions occurred in over one-fourth, 26.3 per cent, of the positions https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 61 held by boys, but in only about one-seventh, 14.7 per cent, of those held by girls. Each different kind of violation, too, was more com mon among boys. In over one-fifth, 21.4 per cent, of the positions held b y boys, but only about one-eighth, 12.6 per cent, of those held by girls, the daily hours were too long; and in over one-sixth, 17.9 per cent, of the positions held by boys, but less than one-tenth, 9.6 per cent, of those held b y girls the weekly hours were too long. In the case of night work the difference was even greater, 13.2 per cent as compared with 2.2 per cent; and of the 19 positions in which children were required to work 7 days a week, 15 were held b y boys. Even undertime was slightly more common among boys than among girls. These differences between boys and girls were due in large part to the occupations in which they were employed. As in the case of certificate violations, too long as too short hours were most likely to occur in occupations in which as a rule only one child was hired by an employer. In messenger, errand, and delivery work positions, for example, in which boys largely preponderated, violations of the law relating to hours occurred in nearly three-tenths, 29.6 per cent, and in the entire group of clerical and other similar occupations in not far from one-fourth, 23.4 per cent, of all the positions held. In factory and mechanical occupations, on the other hand, in which girls preponderated, the law relating to hours was violated in less than one-sixth, 16.2 per cent, of all the positions. The differences found in the number of hour violations between children of the various nationality groups also appear to be due primarily to occupation. For example, it was found that the children of foreign-born fathers, especially those of nrm-English-spi k i n g nationalities, were more likely than the children of native fathers to be employed too long hours; and at least two occupations in which these children were largely employed, a selling” and operative work in clothing factories and other needle trades, showed particularly high proportions, 44.7 per cent and 24.9 per cent, respectively, of positions in which some legal provision relating to hours was violated. Most of the selling positions were in small shops or similar places where only one child was employed, and even the clothing factories and other needle-trades establishments in which children were em ployed were in many cases small and conducted by foreign-language speaking employers. In shoe factories, on the other hand, where the establishments were usually large and hired many children of native athers and of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities, little more than one-twentieth, 5.5 per cent, of the positions involved hour violations. In occupations in which children often worked without certificates or were certificated late, they were frequently employed also in vio https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 62 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. lation of the legal provisions relating to hours of labor. In little more than one-eighth, 13.3 per cent, of all the positions in which the hours were legal and not excessive, but in nearly three-tenths, 29.6 per cent, of those in which the hours were illegal the children had either failed illegally to take out certificates or had taken them out late. Although this was probably due in part to greater carelessness as to hours when the children were working without certificates, it was primarily due to the fact that violations of the certificate law and of the law relating to hours of labor were both most likely to occur in occupations in which employers usually hired only a single child. In many of these cases the employer, either because of inexperience or because of lack of familiarity with the English language, may have had imperfect knowledge of the requirements of the law. These small employers, of course, are most difficult to reach by an educa tional campaign or by visits of labor-law inspectors. Occupations, hours, arid wages three years later.— The questionnaires sent the children in December, 1918, about three years after they had been interviewed and at a time when the war had created unusual demand for labor and unusually high wages, were answered b y only about two-fifths, 39.8 per cent, of the children, 38.2 per cent of th# boys and 42.4 per cent of the girls. Moreover, of the 182 boys who replied, 37— and doubtless many of those who failed to reply—had enlisted in the United States military or naval service and were there fore omitted from the comparisons of occupations,, hours, and wages in 1918. Among the children who answered, a somewhat larger pro portion had been in higher grades and a somewhat smaller proportion in lower grades than normal when they left school than among all the interviewed children; and for this reason, as well as because the chil dren who were not doing well would perhaps be less likely to answer, this group may have been somewhat more prosperous, on an average, than the children who were not located or failed to reply. Neverthe less, it is believed that this bias is not great enough to prevent the figures frojn being roughly indicative of the progress made by the entire group of children during this period. These figures, especially those relating to wages, should not, however, be considered as indicative of the progress usually made by working children in normal times. When the children answered this questionnaire they were all from 17 to 19 years of age and were, therefore, still minors and subject to certain restrictions in hours and occupations as well as to the require ment that, in most positions, they hold educational certificateST They were no longer, however, subject to the 8-hour law or obliged to attend continuation school, and their choice of occupations was wide as compared with the choice they had before they became 16. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 63 iv, ' Wider opportunities, combined with the greater strength, experi ence, and training which the children must have acquired during this period, are doubtless responsible for their drift away from messenger, errand, and delivery work, and from cash and messenger work in department stores. The first of these occupations accounted for only about one-sixteenth, 6.5 per cent, of the positions held in 1918, as compared with not far from two-fifths, 38.8 per cent, of those held before the date of the interview; and the last accounted for only 1.4 per cent of those held in 1918, as compared with about one-ninth, 11 per cent, of those held before the date of the interview. All three of the other occupations included in the main group of clerical and similar occupations furnished, on the other hand, larger proportions of the positions held three years later than of those held before the children were interviewed in the continuation school. In office work, although both sexes increased, the greater increase was among the girls. More than one-eighth, 13.7 per cent, of the girls were engaged in 1918 in office work— an even larger proportion than of the boys, which was only about one-ninth, 11 per cent. Both in selling and in “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room w ork /’ however, the positions held by boys showed a greater rate of increase than the positions held by girls. In spite of these increases the proportion of positions in clerical and other similar occupations fell, because of the drift away from messenger, errand, and delivery work and from cash and messenger work in department stores, from nearly two-thirds, 64.2 per cent, before the interview to not much over one-third, 36.1 per cent, three years later. At the same time the proportion in factory and mechanical occupations rose from less than one-third, 30.3 per cent, before the interview to considerably over half, 54.3 per cent, three years later. This tendency to enter factory and mechanical occupa tions as they grew older was particularly pronounced among the boys, and was due in large part to their employment as apprentices or helpers in skilled trades— occupations from which they had been in most industries debarred, before their sixteenth birthdays by the legal prohibition of work on or about dangerous machinery. In nearly three-tenths, 29 per cent, of their positions in 1918, as com pared with less than one-fortieth, 2.3 per cent, of those which they held before the date of the interview, the boys were employed as apprentices or helpers in skilled trades. Even in factory operative positions, however, perhaps also because of the removal of legal restrictions, there was a decided increase in the proportion of positions held by both boys and girls. But both sexes showed a pronounced tendency to leave shoe and clothing factories, where they had been so largely employed when younger, for other types of manufacturing industries. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 64 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OP BOSTON. - In each nativity group the children showed the same drift away from carrying positions toward heavier and more skilled work; but the tendency to transfer to factory and mechanical occupations as they grew older was more pronounced among the children of native fathers than among those of foreign-born fathers, and among the children of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities than among those of non-English-speaking nationalities. As will be remembered, in the positions which they held before the date of the interview the children of fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities were most likely, and all those of foreign-born fathers were more likely than those of native fathers, to be employed in factory and mechanical occupations. The tendencies shown by the different groups after the interview were calculated therefore to diminish the differences in occupational distribution. In 1918 a decidedly larger proportion of children of native fathers than of either native or foreign-bom children of foreign-born fathers were employed as apprentices or helpers in skilled trades. But the relatively greater tendency toward factory operative positions shown in their earlier positions by the newer elements of the population was still pronounced three years later. The differences in occupational distribution between retarded an normal children appear to have increased, instead of diminished, as the children grew older. The proportion of positions in factory and mechanical occupations held by children who had been in normal grades for their ages when they left school increased 62.9 per cent between the date of the interview and 1918. During the same period, however, the proportion held in these occupations by children who had been retarded when they left school increased 72.2 per cent. Conversely, the normal children showed a greater tendency than did the retarded children to remain in clerical and other similar occupa tions. This was especially true of office work, in which in 1918 only about 1 in 100, 1.1 per cent, of the retarded children, but nearly 1 in 5, 19.3 per cent, of the normal children was found. As for hours of labor, it should be remembered that the question naire was answered at a time when many manufacturing establish ments still had on hand large war orders. The hours in 1918, therefore, were not only much longer than those which the children had worked when they were restricted by the child-labor law, but were in many cases, doubtless, longer than they would have worked in normal times. In more than two-fifths, 43.3 per cent, of the positions held in 1918, as compared with only 15.3 per cent of those held before tfft children were interviewed, their hours were over 48 a week; and in nearly one-fifth, 19.2 per cent, of the positions held in 1918, as com pared with only 6.4 per cent of those held before the date of the interview, the children worked 54 hours or more. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 65 In the positions held in 1918, as in those held before they were 16, the boys more frequently worked long hours than did the girls. This was due entirely, however, to the places in clerical and other similar occupations. Over half, 51.9 per cent, of the boys employed in this group of occupations, but less than one-fourth, 23.5 per cent, of the girls, worked over 48 hours a week. In factory and mechani cal occupations, on the other hand, in which the hours were over 48 in not far from half, 44.9 per cent, of all the positions held, more girls than boys were employed for these hours. Moreover, in spite of the law limiting the hours of all women to 54 a week, over one-fifth, 20.9 per cent, of the girls employed in factory and mechanical occupations, as compared with less than one-tenth, 9.7 per cent, of the boys, worked 54 hours or more. The pressure of war work also accounts in large part for the com paratively high wages received in 1918. The removal of restrictions on their employment, as well as their greater age and experience, would doubtless have enabled the children to earn more three years after they were interviewed than they were earning at that time, and still more than when they began work. But the great demand for labor and the increased cost of living doubtless raised their wages to a decidedly higher point than they would have reached in the same time under normal conditions. A large proportion, 57 per cent, of the children who replied to the questionnaire earned in 1918 from $10 to $20 a week; only about one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, made less than $10; but nearly one-fourth, 24.4 per cent, made from $20 to $30; and nine boys received $30 or more. Boys, as in their earlier positions, received higher wages than girls. None of the girls in 1918 made as much as $25 and only about 1 in 40 made over $20 a week. But more than half, 52.4 per cent, of the boys earned over $20 and not far from one-fourth, 22.1 per cent, over $25. Although these wages are not high, there seems to have been considerable increase when it is remembered that nearly threefourths, 73.5 per cent, of the children interviewed had received less than $5 a week in their first regular positions. The children from normal grades for their ages and those who had worked before leaving school— both groups in which the proportion of native children, and especially of native children of native fathers, was unusually high— appear to have continued to hold three years later the advantage in wages which they were found to have had before they were interviewed. More than one-eighth, 14 per cent, f the normal children, but only a little over one-twentieth, 5.5 per cent, of the retarded children, earned $25 or more a week in 1918. At the same time, probably because the normal children were more frequently employed in clerical and other similar occupations in which wages were lower than in factory and mechanical occupations, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 66 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. a larger proportion of these children, 14 per cent, than of the retarded children, 5.6 per cent, earned less than $10 a week. The higher wages in factory and mechanical than in clerical and similar occupations may have been due in part to a greater influence of war production; but in part it was doubtless due to a larger pro portion of positions requiring some skill and experience. For boys the difference was slight. Somewhat more than half, 52.8 per cent, of the boys employed in factory and mechanical occupations, and exactly half, 50 per cent, of those employed in clerical and similar occupations, made $20 or over a week. But for girls a much greater difference was found. Over one-fourth, 25.6 per cent, of the girls employed in factory and mechanical occupations, but less than onetwentieth, 3.9 per cent, of those employed in clerical and similar occupations, made $15 or more a week. The wage increases during the three years following the interview were large as compared with those between the first and last regular positions before the children were interviewed. All the children reported higher weekly wages in 1918 than when interviewed and more than half, 51.5 per cent, reported increases of $10 or more, while in 10 cases the increases amounted to $24 or more. As would be ex pected, the wage increases of boys were greater than those of girls. For both sexes, however, the period of greatest wage increase was evidently after the sixteenth birthday and, although this was due in part to the rapid changes in industrial conditions which occurred during the three years from 1915 to 1918, greater freedom from legal restrictions and wider choice of occupations, as well as increased age and strength, undoubtedly had much to do with these wage increases. Conclusion.— As suggested in the introduction to this study, three points stand out in any consideration of public policy with regard to the industrial labor of physically and mentally half-developed children. First is the health and normal growth of the child, second his training for useful labor in adult life, and third his preparation for citizenship in a democracy. The productivity of the labor of children is of little consequence, even from a purely economic stand point, for what an individual can produce during his years of child hood is negligible as compared with what he can produce during his adult years. The present inquiry throws little light upon the first of these points. When it is remembered that these 5,692 children— onethird of all the children of their ages in Boston, Cambridge, Somer ville, and Chelsea—were living through perhaps the most critic^ years of their bodily growth and development at the very time that they were being initiated into industrial life, it is evident that a far more thorough study is needed of the effects of child labor upon health than was here attempted. Before the results of this early https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTORY SUM M ARY. 67 labor can be adequately measured it is necessary, too, that its in fluence over physical growth and development should be carefully considered. At present very little is known as to the effects of different occupations upon the plastic bodies of the young children who are employed in them. As for preparation for industrial efficiency and for the duties of citizenship in adult life, this study appears to show that, for the fourfifths of these child workers who had definitely left school for industry, the period between the date of leaving school and the sixteenth birthday was in nearly all cases almost, if not completely, wasted, and that for many it was worse than wasted. Equipped with at best only a rudimentary education and guided, except in rare in stances, only by chance, these children were necessarily excluded by law from all trades involving the use of dangerous machinery, and by their own ignorance and inexperience from practically all other occupations which would offer them any opportunity to acquire either mental or manual skill. In the vast majority of cases even the little dexterity which they might have obtained in a position was soon lost because as they grew older they passed on from their children’s tasks to entirely different occupations. 'm Thus, with no opportunity to acquire industrial experience of any real value, these children drifted, about restlessly from one simple task or errand position to another, on the one hand often unemployed for long periods, and on the other hand frequently obliged to work excessively, and generally illegally, long hours or at night,— all for wages which averaged only $16.68 a month. Permanently handi capped, in most cases for life, by an educational training inadequate either to make them adaptable to the changing industrial conditions of modern life, or to give them the background necessary for an understanding of the duties of citizenship, they were subjected also to positive damage from irregular habits of work, from labor un adapted to their needs and capacities, and from unsuitable associa tions and environments. Each of the two outstanding, yet to a considerable extent over lapping, groups of child workers found in this study—-the misfits in the school system as evidenced both by retardation and by dislike of school, and the children from immigrant families— presents its own special problems. That over half the children leaving school for industry at 14 and 15 years of age had failed to complete the eighth grade; that retardation, measured by the very conservative scale adopted for this report, was very prevalent among these children; ¿hat about one-fourth of them gave as their reason for leaving that they disliked school or did not wish to go on to high school; that their entrance into industry was frequently preceded by a period, in many cases a long period, of absence from school; and that more of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 68 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTOitf. them went to work just after school had opened in September than in any other month of the year— all these facts show the pressing neec% for the study and application of methods of training adolescent boys and girls which will make the most of whatever capacity each may possess. That some of these children, probably, were hampered by more or less feeble intellects only emphasizes the need for special training, adapted to their abilities, in order that as many as possible may be made self-supporting and self-respecting citizens instead of public burdens or public problems. Retardation appears in many cases, however, to have resulted merely from the difficult and often painful process of being trans planted from one country to another or from being surrounded by families so transplanted. Moreover, because of their comparative failure in school, their greater poverty, their national customs, or all three combined, the children of foreign parentage, and especially those who were themselves foreign born, were more likely to leave school for industry before their sixteenth birthdays than were the children of native parentage. That nearly half the foreign-born chil dren in the four cities, as compared with only about one-fourth of the native children, became regular workers at this early age; that only about one-third of them had completed the eighth or a highe; grade; and that about half were decidedly retarded in school— these facts show comparative failure at the very point where greatest success might be anticipated in the process of transforming recent immigrants into American citizens. This failure is further evident when it is recalled that, although four-fifths of the children who took out employment certificates had been born in the United States, some seven-tenths had foreign-born fathers, and that these children of foreign parentage were handicapped, though to a less degree, in all the ways that the children who were themselves foreign bom were handicapped. The definite advantage which children from normal or higher than normal grades for their ages had over those who were retarded, in occupations, steadiness of work, initial wages, wage increases, and average earnings— an advantage which was, if anything, more pro nounced three years later than at the time the children were inter viewed— though in large part due to the same superior intelligence or thorough familiarity with the language and customs of the country which made the children successful in their school work, was great enough, for the boys at least, to suggest that even the small amount of education which the eighth-grade graduate could boast over tj sixth-grade graduate was a real industrial asset. For the girls th. effect of differences in education is blurred by the frequent employ ment of those who were normal or advanced in their school work in temporary positions in department stores. But this merely suggests https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTKODUCTORY SU M M ARY. 69 |aat, if children of school age are to be permitted to enter industry, t least, before they are allowed to take the serious step of abandoning their school studies, their employers should be required to oifer them something more than a few days’ work. The problems here studied are those of practically all the larger cities of the United States, and the main facts shown, with only slight modifications due to local conditions, are probably as true of other cities as of Boston. Massachusetts, indeed, through its con tinuation-school law, its law requiring evening school attendance of all minors who are unable to read and write English, its eight-hour law, and other acts, has done more to improve conditions than most other States. Since the period of this study, moreover, Massachu setts has raised the educational requirement for employment under 16 to completion of the sixth grade, has elaborated its certificate system, has made continuation-school attendance compulsory in all the larger cities of the State, and has made special efforts to enforce the physical requirements for an employment certificate. Neverthe less, although the degree of damage caused by employment is thus doubtless somewhat reduced, even a child who is in perfect health and has completed the sixth grade is very poorly equipped to assume burdens of adult life. The findings of this study point to the act that, whether in Boston or any other similar commercial and manufacturing city, both the child and the community have more to lose than to gain by a policy which permits children to go to work when less than 16 years of age. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FÆ1 THE CHILDREN. Approximately one-third, 35.2 per cent, of the children who became 14 years of age during the year ended September 1,1914— in all, 5,692 children— in the four cities studied, took out employment certificates for gainful labor before they became 16 years of age. According to Table 1, more boys than girls went to work at this early age, 42.3 per cent of the boys as compared with only 28 per cent of the girls. Of these children about four-fifths were native and one-fifth foreign bom ; about three-fifths were boys and two-fifths girls. A much larger proportion of the foreign-bom than of the native children in the four cities, however, went to work before they became 16 years of age. Less than one-third, 32.3 per cent, of all native children, and less than one-fourth, 24.7 per cent, of the native girls, took out certificates. But of the foreign born nearly three-fifths, 58.3 per cent, of all children— over three-fifths, 61.7 per cent, of the boys and more than one-half, 54.9 per cent, of the girls—became wage earners before they were 16 years of age. Among the foreign bom there appears less difference between the sexes in the tendency to go to work early than among the native. 1 .— Prevalence o f em ploym ent o f children between the fourteenth and sixteenth birthdays, by sex and n a tivity; children in B oston , Cambridge, Som erville, and Chelsea who were 14 but less than 15 years o f age on S ep t. 1, 1914- Table Children aged 14 but less than 15 years, Sept. 1,1914— Sex and nativity. Estimated total.1 W h o took out employment certificates between their f ourteenth and sixteenth birthdays. Number. A ll children. Bovs. Girls.. Native. Boys. Girls. Foreign born. Boys. Girls. Per cent of estimated total. 16,192 ' 5,692 35.: 8, OSS 8,104 «3, 419 2,273 42.3 28.0 14,402 4,646 32.3 7,185 7,217 2,860 1,786 39.8 24.7 1,790 1.044 903 887 557 487 61., 54.9 1 Estimated from the figures for children aged 10-14, 1900 and 1910, assuming in each nativity group an arithmetical increase of population, multiplied b y the proportion of the age group 10-14 that was 14 in Bostonin 1910. The ratio of the scxesin 1910is then applied to find the numbers of boys and girls. Native is the sum of native white and Negro; foreign born the sum of foreign white and other colored. * Including two (boys) for whom nativity was not reported. 70 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 71 TH E CHILDREN. ^ a b l e 2. Prevalence o f em ploym ent o f children between the fourteenth and sixteenth birthdays, by nativity and city o f em ploym ent; children in B oston , Cambridge, Somer ville, and Chelsea who were 14 but less than 15 years o f age on S ep t. 1, 1914. Children aged 14 but less than 15 years, Sept. 1, 1914— City of employment and nativity. Estimated total.1 W h o took out employment certificates between their fourteenth and sixteenth birthdays. Num ber. All children. Boston......... Cambridge... Somerville__ Chelsea......... Per cent of estimated total. 16,192 3 5,692 35.2 12,273 1,925 1,417 577 4,401 664 386 241 35.9 34.5 27.2 41.8 Native. 14,402 4,646 32.3 Boston......... . Cambridge__ Somerville__ Chelsea.......... 10,875 1,762 1,345 420 3,609 538 345 154 33.2 30.5 25.7 36.7 1,790 1,044 Foreign born Boston...... Cambridge. Somerville. Chelsea___ 1,398 163 72 157 58.3 56.6 76.7 56.9 55.4 . 1 Estimated from the figures for children aged 10-14, 1900 and 1910, assuming in each n tv an arithmetical increase of population, multiplied b y the proportion of the age group 10-14 that was 14 in Boston in l qjo N ative is the sum of native white and Negro; foreign born the sum of foreign-born white and other colored 3 Including two for whom nativity was not reported. ' The tendency of children to seek employment seems to differ de cidedly in the four cities. Boston and Cambridge, according to Table 2, show figures which vary only slightly from the average for the four; the Boston figures are slightly higher and the Cambridge figures slightly lower than the average. But Somerville and Chelsea differ markedly not only from each other, but also from the average; in the former only 27.2 per cent of the children took out employment certificates as against 41.8 per cent in the latter. This difference appears to be due primarily to differences in the proportion of foreign born. In Somerville, as appears in Table 3, only 5.1 per cent of the children aged 14 on September 1, 1914, were foreign born, while in Chelsea the foreign born constituted 27.2 per cent of the children of this age. The proportion of foreign-born children in Boston was 11.4 per cent, and in Cambridge only 8.5 T?er cent somewhat lower as compared with Boston than might ave been expected from the comparative proportions of children going to work. This difference appears to be due to the unusually large proportion, 76.7 per cent, of foreign-born children who took out certificates in Cambridge, for Table 2 shows that the native https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 72 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. children of that city showed somewhat less tendency to go to work* than those of Boston. On the other hand, Chelsea had the largest proportion, 36.6 per cent, of native children taking out employment certificates. To a considerable extent, doubtless, the differences which can not be accounted for by the nativity of the children of the different cities might be accounted for b y the nativity of their parents.27 T a b l e 3.— N ativity, by city; children in B oston, Cambridge, Som erville, and Chelsea who were 14 but less than 15 years o f age on S ept. 1 , 1914• Per c e n t1 of children aged 14. but less than 15 years, Sept, 1,1914. City. Total. Native. Foreign bom . 100.0 88.9 11.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 88.6 91.5 94.9 72.8 11.4 8.5 5.1 27.2 i For figures see Table 2, p. 71. T a b l e 4 .— C ity o f issuance o f certificate, by nativity o f child; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Per cent1 distribution of chil dren to whom employment certificates were issued. City of issue. B oston.................................................................................................................................... A ll children. Native. Foreign born. 100.0 100.0 100.0 77.3 11.7 6 .8 4.2 77.7 11.6 7 .4 3.3 75.8 12.0 3.9 8.3 1 For figures see Table 2, p. 71, The actual numbers of working children in Somerville and Chelsea, and even in Cambridge, as shown in Table 2, were small as compared with those in Boston. Over three-fourths, 77.3 per cent, of all the children to whom certificates were issued in the four cities went to w ork28 in Boston; 11.7 per cent went to work in Cambridge, 6.8 per cent in Somerville, and 4.2 per cent in Chelsea, as shown in Table 4. 27 The nativity of the father is tabulated for the continuation-school children who were interviewed by agents of the bureau, and the results, though relating only to Boston children, seem to justify this con clusion. See Tables 12 and 13, pp. 79 and 80. 28 The figures relate to children who went to worfe in each c ity and not necessarily to children living in that city. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 73 TH E CHILDREN. The figures thus far given relate to children who took out em ployment certificates for work at any time, and some of these chil dren worked only during summer vacations or out of school hours. Except for Boston, no information was available in the records as to the proportion of children taking out employment certificates who were actually beginning their working lives; that is, who were leaving school to become regular workers. In Boston, 3,544 of the 4,401 children who took out certificates, or 80.5 per cent, appear to have definitely left school for industry. Table 5 shows, therefore, that the proportion of the estimated population of this age group actually leaving school to begin work before they were 16 years of age was 28.9 per cent. Over one-third, 34.5 per cent, of all the boys of this age, but less than one-fourth, 23.2 per cent, of the girls, belonged to this group. Only a little over one-fourth, 26.4 per cent, of the native children and nearly half, 47.7 per cent, of the foreign-born children left school to become regular workers before they were 16. Among the foreign bom , too, the tendency of girls to become regular workers was nearly as great as that of boys, while among the native a great difference is observed between the two sexes, for 32.7 per cent of he boys and only 20.2 per cent of the girls had left school for work efore their sixteenth birthdays. T a b l e 5.— Prevalence o f regular em ploym ent o f children between the fourteenth and sixteenth birthdays, by sex and n a tivity; children in B oston who were 14 but less than 15 years o f age on S ep t. 1 ,1 9 1 4 . Children aged 14 but less than 15 years, Sept. 1,1914— Sex and n ativity. Esti mated total.1 W h o took out employ m ent certificates for regular work between the fourteenth and six teenth birthdays. Numbe'r. A ll children. Boys. Girls. 2 3,544 28.9 6,152 ’ 2,114 1,430 34.5 23.2 10,875 2,876 26.4 5,406 5,469 1,769 1,107 32.7 667 47.7 6,121 Native. Boys. Girls. Per cent of estimated total. Foreign-born. 715 683 20.2 344 323 1 Estimated from the figures for children aged 10-14, 1900 and 1910, assuming an arithmetical increase of population, and then multiplied b y the proportion of the age group 10-14 that was 14 in Boston in 1910. 2 Including one boy for whom nativity was not reported. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22— - 6 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 74 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. SEX. As has been seen, a decidedly larger proportion of boys than of girls went to work in the four cities combined, almost exactly threefifths, 60.1 per cent, of the child workers being boys and two-fifths, 39.9 per cent, being girls. Table 6 shows also that the proportion of girls was slightly larger in Boston, according to both the certificate and the continuation-school records, than in the four cities combined, and was a little more than two-fifths, 42 per cent, of the 823 children interviewed. Among native children the proportion of boys was somewhat larger than among children of both nativities combined, and the different series of records and schedules showed less than 1 per cent difference in sex distribution. T 6 . — Sex o f em ployed children, by na tivity; comparison o f children interviewed with children in Boston continuation school and with children issued certificates in fo u r able cities. Children issued certificates. A ll cities. Children in Boston continua tion school. Boston. Children interviewed (Boston). Sex and nativity. A ll children. B oys. Girls. N ative. Boys. Girls. Foreign-born. Boys. Girls. Per cent distri bution. Per cent distri bution. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 15,692 100.0 2 4,401 100.0 2 3; 399 100.0 823 100.0 13,419 2,273 60.1 39.9 ¡2,633 1,768 59. § 40.2 22,026 1,373 59.6 40.4 477 346 58.0 42.0 1,701 1,060 61.6 38.4 401 256 637 100.0 100.0 324 313 50.9 49.1 45.8 54.2 N um ber. 4,646 100.0 3,609 2,860 1,786 61.6 38.4 2,215 1,394 1,044 100.0 791 557 487 53.4 46.6 417 374 1 Including two boys for whom n ativity was not reported. 2 Including one boy for whom n ativity was not reported. N um ber. N um ber. 100.0 2,761 61.4 38.6 52.7 47.3 61.0 39.0 y Among the foreign-born children girls constituted nearly half, 46.6 per cent, of all the children who took out employment certificates in the four cities; they formed 47.3 per cent of those in Boston, 49.1 per cent of those in the Boston continuation-school group, and over onehalf, 54.2 per cent, of the children who were interviewed in the con tinuation school. As the 47.3 per cent shown in the Boston certificate records may be considered typical of all children taking out cer tificates in that city, it is evident that the continuation school an’ schedule records included a few too many girls to be entirely repre sentative of the sex distribution of foreign-born children. The dis proportion is not great, however, and the figures for the certificate https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis The children . 75 records show again a decidedly greater tendency for foreign-born than for native girls to go to work. In Boston alone, where girls consti tuted 47.3 per cent of the foreign bom , they constituted only 38.6 per cent of the native children who took out certificates. NATIVITY. Approximately four-fifths of all the children, and also of the chil dren in each of the smaller groups, as shown in Table 7, were native born.28® Somewhat less than one-fifth, indeed, were foreign born in every group except that of the interviewed children, where the pro portion of foreign born was exactly 20.2 per cent. The greater teridency, already noticed, of foreign born than of native girls to go to work is shown again in the fact that the foreign born constituted 21.4 per cent of all the girls who took out certificates in the four cities as compared with only 16.3 per cent of all the boys. The figures for the continuation-school group show 22.8 per cent of the girls to have been foreign born and those for the schedule group 26 per cent. The larger proportion, therefore, of foreign-born chil dren found in the schedule group, as compared with the other groups, was evidently due to an excess of girls. 7 . — N ativity o f em ployed children, by sex; comparison o f children interviewea with children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Table Per cent distribution. N ativity and sex. Children issued certificates. A ll cities. Boston. Children Children in Bos inter ton con viewed tinuation (Bos school. ton). Both sexes............................................................................................ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 N ative................................................................................................................ Foreign born.................................................................................................... 81.6 18.3 82.0 18.0 81.2 18.7 79.8 20.2 B o y s ....................................................................................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 N ative.......................... ..................................................................................... Foreign born........ .'........................................................................... ............. 83.7 16.3 84.1 15.8 84.0 16.0 84.1 15.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 78.6 21.4 78.8 21.2 77.2 22.8 74.0 26.0 Girls........................ N ative.......................................................................................... 1.................... Foreign born.............................................. ..................................................... The four, cities, as shown in Table 10,286 differed decidedly in the proportion which the foreign born constituted of all children who _took out employment certificates. In Boston and Cambridge, as in ie four cities combined, about 18 per cent of these children were foreign born. But in Somerville only about one-tenth, 10.6 per cent, 28a A s the certificate record did not specify whether the children were colored or white, and as only 18 colored children were included in the continuation-school group, colored children are not separately itemized in the tabulation. See p. 78. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 76 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. were foreign bora, while in Chelsea the foreign bom constituted over one-third, 36.1 per cent, of all the children who obtained certificates. It is said that after the Chelsea fire of 1908 a large number of the former inhabitants moved away and were replaced by immigrant families. BIRTHPLACE. Of all the children who took out certificates in the four cities, as shown in Table 8, 6.1 per cent were born in Russia, 5.7 per cent in Italy, 2 per cent in England and Scotland, and 1.7 per cent in British North America. Only six-tenths of 1 per cent were born in Ireland. These figures, as will be seen later in discussing the nationalities of the children’s fathers,29 reflect, not the distribution of the different nationalities in the entire population but merely the relative recency of immigration from different countries. The Russians and Italians constituted the newer immigration. The English and Irish had been in this country longer and, therefore, a larger proportion of their children of working age had been born here. T a b l e 8 . ___P lace o f birth o f em p loyed children1 ; com parison o f children in terview ed w ith children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certificates in fo u r cities.- Children issued certificates. A ll cities. Children in Bos ton continuation school. Boston. Children interviewed in Boston. Country of birth. Per cent Per cent Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. tion. tion. Total................................ 1 5,692 N ative.......................... - ............ Foreign born............................ 4,646 1,044 2 4,401 81.6 18.3 3,609 791 82.0 18.0 2 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 2,761 637 81.2 18.7 657 166 79.8 20.2 British North America. England and Scotland. Ireland................................ Ita ly .................................... Russia................................ Other.................................. 1 TnninHing two boys for whom nativity was not reported. 2 Including one boy for whom nativity was not reported. In Boston alone the certificate records show a somewhat higher proportion of Italians— 6.5 per cent— and this proportion is even higher, 7.3 per cent, in the continuation-school records, and still higher, 10.9 per cent, in the group of children for whom schedules were taken. The children interviewed show, on the other hand, a comparatively low proportion, only 4 per cent, of Russian children The larger proportion of Italian children in the continuation-schoo group may be accounted for by the fact, which will later be shown 23 See page 80. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 77 TH E CHILDREN. ^statistically,30 that of all children who applied for certificates the Italians were more likely than children of other nationality groups to leave school permanently to go to work; for vacation workers are included in the certificate but not in the continuation-school records. But it is evident that, for some reason, a larger number of Italian children and a smaller number of Russian children were interviewed than were typical of their respective groups in the child-labor popula tion of Boston. Table 9, which gives the distribution by place of birth of the 166 foreign-born children who were interviewed, shows that, though nearly as many children born in Russia as children born in Italy took out certificates in Boston, over one-half, or 54.2 per cent, of the foreign-born children who were interviewed were born in Italy, and less than one-fifth, 19.9 per cent, in Russia. This discrepancy is even greater among the girls, for nearly two-thirds, 63.3 per cent, of the foreign-born girls interviewed had been born in Italy. Italian girls, therefore, appear to constitute the nativity element composing the excess already mentioned 31 of foreign-born children among those for whom schedules were taken. T able 9 .— Place o f birth, by sex; foreign-born children interviewed. Children. Place of birth. Boys. Girls. Per cent Number. distribu tion. Per cent Number. distribu tion. Number. Per cent distribu tion. Total.............................................................. 166 100.0 76 100.0 90 100.0 British North America...................................... England................................................................. Ireland.................................... Scotland................. Italy............................................ R ussia.............................................................. Other.................................................. 5 12 6 6 90 33 14 3.0 7.2 3.6 3.6 54.2 19.9 8.4 3 7 5 4 33 15 9 3.9 9.2 6.6 5.3 43.4 19.7 11.8 2 5 1 2 57 18 5 2 2 5.6 1.1 2.2 63.3 20.0 5.6 The four cities differ quite as much in the proportions of their working children born in different countries as in the proportions of foreign born. Table 10 shows that the high proportion of foreign born in Chelsea, for example, is due to children'born in Russia; over one-fourth, 26.1 per cent, of all the children who took out certificates in that city came from Russia, as compared with 6 per cent in Boston, 2.9 per cent in Cambridge, and 0.3 per cent in Somerville. In Cam bridge, on the other hand, 36 children who were born in Portugal Including those born in the Azores) took out certificates— a larger proportion than of any other foreign-born group. In other words, though in the four cities combined this group furnished only 40 80 See Table 64, p. 150. S1 See p . 75. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis *78 th e w o r k in g c h il d r e n of Bo s t o n . children, or less than 1 child in 100, in Cambridge more than 1 child,, in every 20 taking out certificates was born in Portugal or the Azores. Cambridge and Chelsea, however, and even Somerville, had fewer Italian children than had Boston. T able 10.— Place o f birth, by city o f issue; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children to whom certificates were issued in— A ll cities. Boston. Cambridge. Somerville. Chelsea. Place of birth. Per Per Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent Num cent Num cent N um distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. bu bution, bution. bution, bution. tion. A ll countries.......................... . 5,692 *4,401 100.0 United States........................ . 4,646 3,609 82.0 Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea.................................. Elsewhere in United States......... 4,023 623 70.7 10.9 3,163 446 71.9 Foreign countries.................. 1.044 18.3 791 R ussia................................................... Ita ly ...................................................... England, Scotland, and W a les. . . British North America.................. Portugal, including the Azores. . Ireland.................................................. Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. Austria-Hungary.............................. Turkey, including Syria................ Germany............................................. Other countries................................. 349 323 10.1 ! 664 100.0 386 81.0 345 100.0 89.4 51.5 12.4 281 64 455 83 87 125 36.1 63 111 .3 .5 1 Including two children whose place of birth was not reported. * Including one child whose place of birth was not reported. YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES. The certificate records do not show how long the foreign-born children had been in the United States, but, according to Table 11, in the group for whom continuation-school records were used about one-fourth, 24 per cent, of the foreign-born children had been in the United States less than 5 years; somewhat more than one-third, 35.2 per cent, had been in this country 5 years but less than 10; and not quite one-third, 31.8 per cent, had been here for 10 years or more. The last group had been brought to this country when they were under school age and had therefore received all their education in the United States. Of the foreign-born children who were inter viewed practically the same proportion, 31.3 per cent, had been in this country for over 10 years, about two-fifths, 40.4 per cent, between 5 and 10 years, and about one-fifth, 21.7 per cent, less than 5 years Considering the small numbers involved, there is no particular significance in the slight differences between the two groups of children. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 79 TH E CHILDREN. . T a b l e 1 1 .— Years o f residence in the United States; comparison o f foreign-born children interviewed with foreign-born children in B oston continuation school. Foreign-born chil dren in Boston con tinuation school. Foreign-born chil dren interviewed (Boston). Years in the United States. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. T o ta l.... 637 100.0 166 100.0 Under 5............ 5 but under 10. 10 and over___ N ot reported.. 153 224 203 57 24.0 35.2 31.8 8.9 36 67 52 11 21.7 40.4 31.3 6.6 FATHER’S NATIVITY AND NATIONALITY. Although only about one-fifth of the working children of Boston were themselves foreign born, nearly three-fourths, 72.1 per cent, of the children interviewed had foreign-born fathers. Table 12, which shows these proportions, may slightly overstate the impor tance of the foreign element, for a somewhat higher percentage of interviewed children than of all children who took out certificates were foreign born. But it is safe to say that at least 7 out of every 10 children taking out certificates were of foreign parentage. Yet fully two-thirds of these children of foreign-born fathers had them selves been born in the United States. The two groups of nationalities, those of north and west Europe and of south and east Europe, each furnished, as shown in Table 13, a larger number of fathers of interviewed children, 31.3 per cent and 36.1 per cent, respectively, than did the United States. Of the separate nationalities the Italians predominated; 23.9 per cent of the children had Italian fathers, nearly as many as had native fathers.33 But not far from the same proportion, 20.3 per cent, had Irish fathers. On the other hand, the fathers of only 8.5 per cent of the children interviewed were Russian Jews.34 T a b l e 12 .— N ativity o f father and child, by sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. N ativity of father and child. Boys. Per cent Number. distribu- Number tion. Girls. Per cent distribu- Number. distribution. tion. Total............................................ 823 100.0 477 100.0 346 100.0 $ ° t h fathers and children native, thers foreign born......................... 201 593 24.4 72.1 127 328 26.6 68.8 74 265 21.4 76.6 Children native.......................... Children foreign born............... 427 166 51.9 20.2 252 76 52.8 15.9 175 90 50.6 26.0 N ativity of fathers not reported. . 29 3.5 22 4.6 7 2.0 83 A s shown on p . 76 the proportion of Italian children in the schedule series is somewhat larger than for Boston alone in the certificate series, which includes all the children going to work. 84 This, as already shown on p . 77, is too small a proportion to be representative of all children taking out certificates in Boston. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 80 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. T a b l e 13.— N ationality o f father, by sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. Nationality of father. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu N unfter. distribu tion. tion. 477 Total. Father n ative............ Father foreign born. Girls. Boys. 201 593 24.4 72.1 127 328 26.6 Per cent distribu tion. 346 100.0 74 265 21.4 76.6 31.3 North and west Europe. English............. Irish................... Scotch............... German............ Scandinavian. Other................ 44.8 South and east Europe___ Russian Jewish................................. Other Jewish...................................... Italian.................................................. O ther................................ ................... .2 .7 Asia, Syrian............................ North America...................... 12 0 French Canadian.............................. English and Scotch C anadian.. . N ativity of fathers not reported. 29 3.5 i Including 1 boy the nationality of whose father was not specified. The sources of the newer immigration stand out distinctly when the parentage of the native children is compared with, that of the foreign-born children. For example, Table 14 shows that of the native children whose fathers were foreign born 55 per cent had fathers from north and west Europe and only 37.9 per cent had fathers from south and east Europe, while Table 15 shows that of the foreign-born children only 13.9 per cent had fathers from north and west Europe and 81.3 per cent had fathers from south and east Europe. Although only 24.8 per cent of the native children with foreign-born fathers were Italian, 54.8 per cent of the foreign-born children- were Italian. This difference is still more marked in the case of the Russian Jews, for only 8.7 per cent of the native children of foreign parentage but 19.9 per cent of the foreign-born children belonged to this group. On the other hand, all the different groups of nationalities classed under “ north and west Europe” show oppo site conditions. Irish children, indeed, constituted over one-third, 37.7 per cent, of the native children of foreign parentage, and only 3.6 per cent of the foreign-born children. As would be expected from comparisons already made, a smalle proportion of the girls than of the boys, 21.4 per cent as compared with 26.6 per cent, were native born of native fathers. Table 12 shows that over three-fourths, 76.6 per cent, of the girls had foreignborn fathers, and only 50.6 per cent of them, as compared with 52.8 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis THE 81 CH IL D R E N , per cent of the boys, were native children of foreign parentage. In Tables 13, 14, and 15 the nationalities of the fathers of these boys and girls are further analyzed in detail. T able 14. Nationality offather, by sex o f child; native children with foreign-born fathers interviewed. Native children. Both sexes. B oys. Girls. Nationality of father. N um ber. Per cent N um distriber. button. Per cent N um distriber. button. Per cent distributton. Father foreign born................. 427 100.0 252 100.0 175 100.0 North and west Europe. 235 55.0 147 58.3 88 50.3 29 161 9 19 15 2 6.8 37.7 2.1 4.4 3.5 .5 21 96 5 16 8 1 8.3 38.1 2.0 6.3 3.2 .4 8 65 4 3 7 1 4.6 37.1 2.3 1.7 4.0 .6 162 37.9 85 33.7 . 77 44.0 37 5 106 14 8.7 1.2 24.8 3.3 23 4 51 7 9.1 1.6 20.2 2.8 14 1 55 7 8.0 .6 31.4 4.0 English.......... Irish............... Scotch............. German.......... Scandinavian. Other............. South and east Europe. Russian Jewish. Other Jewish___ Italian.................. Other.................... Asia, S yrian ... 1 .2 1 .4 North America. 129 6.8 119 7.5 10 5.7 5 23 1.2 5.4 3 15 1.2 6.0 2 8 1.1 4.6 French Canadian.......................... English and Scotch Canadian. T a b l e 15. — Nationality o f father, by sex o f child; foreign-born children interviewed. Both sexes. Boys. Girls. Nationality of father. N um ber. Per cent N um distriber. button. Per cent N um distriber. button. Per cent distributton. Father foreign horn................... 166 100.0 76 100.0 90 North and west E u rope.. 23 13.9 18 23.7 5 English.......................................... Irish................................................ Scotch............................................. German.......................................... Scandinavian.............................. 7 6 6 1 3 4.2 3.6 3.6 .6 1.8 5 5 4 1 3 6.6 6.6 5.3 1.3 3.9 2 1 2 2.2 1.1 2.2 100.0 ■ 5.6 South and east Europe.. . 135 81.3 57 75.0 78 86.7 Russian Jewish........................... Dther Jewish................................ •Italian............................................ Other.............. ............................... 33 4 91 7 19.9 2.4 54.8 4.2 17 3 34 3 22.4 3.9 44.7 3.9 16 1 57 4 17.8 1.1 63.3 4.4 Asia, Syrian......................... 5 3.0 5 5.6 North America.................... 3 1.8 1 1.3 2 2.2 1 2 .6 1.2 1 1.3 1 1 1.1 1.1 French Canadian....................... English and Scotch Canadian. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 82 T H E WOÏtKIÜTG C H Ïh D ïtE N ÔF BOSTO N . The relative tendency of the different nationality groups to send their daughters to work as compared with their sons is best shown, however, in Table 16. Where the fathers were native, girls fur nished only about one-third, 36.8 per cent, of the working children. In other words, from American families only one girl to every two boys went to work before the age of 16. But in families where the father was foreign born the proportion of girl workers rose to 44.7 per cent. In other words,, nearly half the child workers from the families of immigrants were girls. T able 16.— S ex o f child, by nationality o f father and nativity o f child; children interviewed. Boys. Nationality of father and nativity of child. Girls. Children. Number. Per cent.1 Number. Per cent.1 823 447 58.0 346 42.0 201 593 127 328 63.2 55.3 • 74. 265 36.8 44.7 Children native.......... . Children foreign born. 427 166 252 76 59.0 45.8 175 90 41.0 54.2 North and west Europe................... 258 165 64.0 93 36.0 235 23 51 38 13 167 161 6 40 36 4 147 18 35 26 9 101 96 5 29 25 4 62.6 Total........................ B oth fathers and children native........ Fathers foreign b o m ............................ Children native.................. . Children foreign born-----English and Scotch.................. . Children native................... Children foreign born........ Irish.......................................... Children native................... Children foreign born____ Other.............................................. Children native.................. Children foreign b o m ------ 68.6 60.5 59.6 ' 88 5 16 12 .4 66 65 1 11 11 37.4 31.4 39.5 40.4 297 142 47.8 155 52.2 Children native.................. Children foreign born____ Russian Jewish.......................... Children native.................. Children foreign b o m -----Italian............................................ Children native.................. Children foreign born........ Other............................................. . Children native.................. Children foreign born____ 162 135 70 37 33 197 106 91 30 19 . 11 85 57 40 23 17 85 51 34 17 11 6 52.5 42.2 57.1 77 78 30 14 16 112 55 57 13 8 5 47.5 57.8 42.9 British North Am erica................... . 32 20 Children native........................... Children foreign b o m ................ 29 3 19 1 10 2 Other....................................................... 6 1 5 Children native........................... Children foreign born................ 1 5 1 N ativity of fathers not reported........... 29 22 7 29 22 7 South and east Europe................... . Children native.................................. 43.1 48.1 37.4 • 56.9 51.9 62.6 12 5 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. This high proportion of girl workers, as compared with boy workers, in the newer elements of the population was due entirely to a greater https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Th e C H IL D R E N . $3 - tendency among fathers from south and east Europe, particularly Italian fathers, to send their daughters, as compared with their sons, to work at an early age. Of the children of fathers from north and west Europe an even smaller proportion, only 36 per cent, than of the children of native fathers were girls. Though Irish fathers showed a somewhat greater tendency to send their daughters to work than native fathers, only 39.5 per cent of the children of Irish fathers who were interviewed in continuation school were girls. Even of the children of Russian Jewish fathers only 42.9 per cent were girls. On the other hand, over one-half, 52.2 per cent, of the chil dren of all fathers from south and east Europe, including the Rus sians, and a still larger proportion, 56.9 per cent, of the children of Italian fathers, were girls. The tendency of Italian fathers to send their daughters to work may be somewhat exaggerated by these figures, for, as already shown,35 a larger proportion of girls who were born in Italy were included in the schedule group than is typical of the entire group of children taking out employment certificates in Boston. Nevertheless, although this tendency was most marked when the child as well as the father was foreign born, over half, 51.9 per cent, of the native children of Italian fathers who were inter viewed were girls. AGE AT GOING TO WORK. Apparently a considerable number of children went to work at the earliest possible date, for Table 17 shows that in the four cities com bined— Boston, Cambridge, Somerviller and Chelsea— more children took out employment certificates between the ages of 14 and 14-£ than between the ages of 14| and 15 or 15 and 15£, and nearly as many as between the ages of 15^- and 16. Of all the children who took out certificates before their sixteenth birthdays 29.9 per cent entered industry before they were 14| years of age, only 19.1 per cent between that age and their fifteenth birthdays, and 20.9 per cent between 15 and 15£. Between 15J and 16, more children— 30 per cent of the total— took out certificates, but this group included children who began work during a summer vacation before the end of which they would be 16 and no longer subject to the compulsoryeducation or child-labor laws.36 The boys showed a slightly greater tendency than did the girls to take out their certificates soon after becoming 14, but a somewhat larger proportion of girls than of boys went to work between 14£ and 15 years of age. The general tendency, however, was the same for both sexes. 85 See p . 77. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 88 See Table 67, p . 153. 84 THE W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O S T O N . T a b l e 17.— A ge at talcing out first certificate and sex; comparison o f children inter viewed with children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certifi-' cates in fo u r cities. Children issued certificates. A ll cities. Children in Bos ton continuation school. Boston. Children inter viewed (B oston).1 Age at taking out first cer tificate, and sex. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. Both sexes......................... 5,692 100.fi 4,401 100.0 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 14 under 14£.................................. 14£ under 15.................................. 15 under 15J.............................. .... 15£ under 16.................................. 1,703 1,089 1,191 1,709 29.9 19.1 20.9 30.0 1,381 854 892 1,274 31.4 19.4 20.3 28.9 1,151 710 732 806 33.9 20.9 21.5 23.7 2 611 162 43 7 74.2 19.7 5.2 0.9 Boys.................................... 3,419 100.0 2,633 100.0 2,026 100.0 477 100.0 14 under 14§.................................. 14£ under 15.................................. 15 under 15J.................................. 15J under 16.................................. 1,048 620 740 1,011 30.7 18.1 21.6 29.6 838 473 562 760 31.8 18.0 21.3 28.9 687 395 464 480 33.9 19. 5 22.9 23.7 2 357 88 29 3* 74.8 18.4 6.1 0.6 Girls........................................ 2,273 100.0 1,768 100.0 1,373 100.0 346 100.0 14 under 14J.................................. 14J under 15.......... ....................... 15 under 15£.................................. 15J under 16...................... .......... 655 469 451 698 28.8 20.6 19.8 30.7 543 381 330 514 30.7 21.5 18.7 29.1 464 315 268 326 33.8 22.9 19.5 23.7 2 254 74 14 4 73.4 21.4 4.0 1.2 1 These two columns relate to actual date of going to work, whereas the others relate to date of taking, out certificate. 2 Including 21 children— 18 boys and 3 girls— who went to work before they were 14. The method of selection, as already stated, was such that both the continuation-school group and the interviewed group of children contained a larger proportion who went to work soon after becoming 14 than did the certificate group. This difference, as shown in Table 17, was comparatively slight in the continuation-school group, where it showed itself entirely in a somewhat smaller proportion of chil dren who took out their certificates when they were 154 hut .under 16 years of age. But it was marked in the schedule group,37 where nearly three-fourths, 74.2 per cent, of all the children were under 144 when they took their first regular positions, and only 6.1 per cent were over 15. In none of the groups was there any significant difference between the proportions of boys and of girls. The tendency noted above for a more than proportionate number of children to take out their certificates within the first six months after becoming 14 appears, according to Table 18, to have affected native more than foreign-born children. Of the native children, a larger number took out certificates before they were 144 than after they were 154 years of age. Among the foreign-born children who were interviewed, a larger proportion than of the native children went to work during the second age period, that is, between 144 an 15, and a correspondingly smaller proportion during the first months after becoming 14. 81 The age at going to work of the children who were interviewed is the actual age at the time of taking the first regular position, and not, as for the other groups of children, the age at taking out the first cer tificate. This fact, in addition to the others already mentioned, would tend to place more children of this group in the earlier age groups. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 85 T H E C H IL D R E N . T a b l e 18 — A ge at talcing out first certificate and nativity; comparison o f children inter viewed with children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children issued certificates. Age at taking out first cer tificate and nativity. A ll cities. N um . ber. A ll children................... Per cent distri bution. «5,692 Boston. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 8 4,401 Children in Boston contin uation school. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 8 3,399 Children inter viewed (Boston).1 N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 4 823 N ativ e.......................................... .. 4,646 100.0 3,609 100.0 2,761 100.0 <657 100.0 14 under 14J........................... 14J under 15........................... 15 under 15£.......................... 15i under 16........................... 1,403 888 966 1,389 30.2 19.1 20.8 29.9 1,140 695 731 1,043 31:6 19.3 20.3 28.9 940 571 595 655 34.0 20.7 21.6 23.7 476 124 35 6 72.5 18.9 5.3 .9 Foreign b o m ................................. 1,044 100.0 791 100.0 637 100.0 4166 100.0 14 under 14J.......................... 14J under 15........................... 15 under 15i.......................... 15J under 16.......................... 299 201 225 319 28.6 19.3 21.6 30.6 241 159 161 230 30.5 20.1 20.4 29.1 211 139 137 150 33.1 21. i? 21.5 23.5 114 38 8 1 68.7 22.9 4.8 .6 1 These two columns relate to actual date of going to work, whereas the others relate to date of taking out certificate. 8 Including two children whose nativity was not reported. Including also three children who went to work before they were 14 years of age, according to continuation-school records, but who did not secure employment certificates until after they were 14. 8 Including one child whose nativity was not reported. - < Including 16 native and 5 foreign-born children who went to work before they were 14. The fact that a smaller proportion of the foreign born than of the native children began work as soon as or soon after they could legally secure certificates is probably due to greater difficulty among the foreign-born children in meeting the educational requirements for an employment certificate. Many of the foreign-born children, as will be seen,38 had barely completed the fourth grade when they went to work, and some of them probably did not complete it until some time after they became 14. Table 19, based on the continuationschool records, shows that the group in which the smallest proportion, 26.1 per cent, took out certificates between 14 and 14£ years of age was that of foreign-born children who had been in the United States less than five years. The supposition that the foreign-born children, if unrestrained by the educational requirements of the law, would have gone to work even younger than the native children is also supported by Table 20, which shows that, among the working children interviewed, a much larger proportion of native children of foreign-born fathers went to work before they were 14^ years of age than of native children of native fathers, 78.2 per cent as compared with 68.7 per cent. The comparatively large proportion of native children found going to work at this age is evidently due entirely to the group whose fathers were foreign born. Therefore, when foreign-born children were compared with native children of native fathers alone it was found that the foreign born had the greater tendency to go to work early. 88See Table 46, p. 120. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 86 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T a b l e 19.— A ge at taking out first certificate, by nativity and length o f residence in the United States; children in B oston continuation school. Children taking out first certificate at specified age. N ativity and length of resi dence in United States. A ll chil dren. 14 under 14}. N um ber. Per cent. 14} under 15. N um ber. 15 under 15}. Per cent. N um ber. 15} under 16. Per cent. N um ber. Per cent. Total................................... 13,399 1,151 33.9 710 20.9 732 21.5 1806 23.7 N a t iv e ......................................... Foreign born............................... 2,761 637 940 211 34.0 33.1 571 139 20.7 21.8 595 137 21.6 21.5 655 150 23.7 23.5 Years in United States: Under 5 ......................... 5 b u t under 1 0 ........... 10 and over.............. : N ot reported............... 153 224 203 57 40 79 61 31 26.1 35.3 30.0 54.4 40 51 39 9 26.1 22.8 19.2 15.8 42 40 43 12 27.5 17.9 21.2 21.1 31 54 60 5 20.3 24.1 29.6 8.8 1 Including one child for whom nativity was not reported. T a b l e 20.— A ge at entering industry, by sex and nativity o f child, and nativity o f father; children interviewed. Children. Both fathers and children native. Total. Age at entering industry, and sex. N um ber. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Per cent distri bution. Fathers fo reign born. Children native. N um ber. Children foreign born. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Per cent distri bution. Nativ ity of fathers not re ported: chil dren native. Both sexes........................ 823 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 166 100.0 29 Under 14}..................................... Under 1 4 }............................. Under 14....................... 14, under 141 m o n th . 14 1 month, under 14 2 m onths................... 142 months, under 14 3 m onths................... 14}, under 14}..................... 14}, under 15........................... . . 15, under 15}............................... 15}, under 16.......................... 611 429 21 216 74.2 52.1 2.6 26.2 138 93 3 44 68.7 46.3 1.5 21.9 334 232 12 117 78.2 54.3 2.8 27.4 119 89 5 45 71.7 53.6 3 .0 27.1 20 15 1 10 104 12.6 24 11.9 60 14.1 19 11.4 1 88 182 162 43 7 10.7 22.1 19.7 5.2 0.9 22 45 51 11 1 10.9 22.4 25.4 5.5 0.5 43 102 68 20 5 10.1 23.9 15.9 4.7 1.2 20 30 38 8 1 12.0 18.1 22.9 4.8 0.6 3 5 5 4 B o y s................................... 477 100.0 127 100.0 252 100.0 76 100.0 22 Under 14}..................................... Under 141............................. Under 14....................... 14, under 141 m onth. 141 month, under 14 2 m onths................... 14 2 months, under 14 357 249 18 125 74.8 52.2 3.8 26.2 92 64 3 33 72.4 50.4 2.4 26.0 199 137 10 68 79.0 54.4 4.0 27.0 53 38 4 16 69.7 50.0 5.3 21.1 13 10 1 8 56 11.7 13 10.2 33 13.1 9 11.8 1 141, under 141..................... 141, under 15............................... 15, under 151............................... 15!, under 1§............................. 50 108 88 29 3 10. 5 22.6 18.4 6.1 0.6 15 28 28 7 11.8 22.0 22.0 5.5 26 62 37 13 3 10.3 24.6 14.7 5.2 1.2 9 15 18 5 11.8 19.7 23.7 6.6 3 5 4 Girls.................................... 346 100.0 74 100.0 175 100.0 90 100.0 7 Under 141..................................... Under 141............................. 254 180 3 91 73.4 52.0 0.9 26.3 46 29 62.2 39.2 14.9 77.1 54.3 1.1 28.0 66 51 1 29 73.3 56.7 1.1 32.2 7 5 11 135 95 2 49 48 13.9 11 14.9 27 15-4 10 11.1 38 74 74 14 4 11.0 21.4 21.4 4.0 1.2 7 17 23 4 1 9.5 23.0 31.1 5.4 1.4 17 40 31 7 2 9.7 22.9 17.7 4 .0 1.1 11 15 20 3 1 12.2 16.7 22.2 3.3 1.1 14, under 141 m onth. 141 month, under 14 2 m onths................... 14 2 months, under 14 3 m onths................... 14}, under 14}..................... 154, under 16............................... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis s rrf 2 3 2 th e c h il d r e n . 87 of thJn t ’ 2l ' 1,,iPer Cef i °f the foreign-bom children, 27.4 per cent of the native children of foreign-bom fathers, and only 21.9 per cent of the nabve children of native fathers went to work 4 h i n £ month the V l T f0Urteent1h b'rthdays. In other words, over one-fourth of fifrt f t t 6'1 “ f,aCh ° f ,the foreign ^ “ "P 3 and llttle more than oneU th o f those in the purely native group included in the group of inter viewed children practically celebrated their fourteenth birthdays by beginning their industrial careers.39 y y nu^ 0mpar“ ,g the boys with the girls, it is observed that of the ve children of native fathers a markedly larger proportion of bbeconung l t m W l14— d 72.4 f 2r4 per Went dT with g the &St m «ntbs after centTasWOrk compared 62.2 perSb£ cent. Muchless difference is found between the native sons and daughters of foreignbom fathers And among the foreign-born children an even larger proportion of girls, 73.3 per cent, than of boys, 69.7 per cent w £ t to work at this early age. It should be remembered, however, that the group of interviewed children contains a larger proportion of oreign-born girls than the entire group of working children. (seepp.5, a«.). ^ https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis worl1 “ « 8 » « a n d i d all those who t o o t out oertmcates THE FAMILIES. To what extent these children came from broken families, that is, from families in which either the father or the mother was dead or not living with the family, is of interest, especially in connection with the child’s reasons for leaving school. Other points which throw light upon his reasons for leaving school are his father’s occupation, whether or not his father was unemployed, and whether or not his mother was employed. These facts are available only for the children included in the continuation-school and schedule groups, all of whom had actually left school to go to work at the time the information was secured. FAMILY STATUS. Of the children included in the continuation-school group, exactly two thirds— 66.6 per cent—lived in normal families at the time they went to work; that is, in families with both a father (or stepfather) and mother (or stepmother) in the home. Of those included in the schedule group an even larger proportion, 70.7 per cent, lived in such families. In both groups, as shown in Table 21, the proportion of girls coming from these normal families was somewhat greater thaii the proportion of boys.40 T a b l e 2 1 . — F am ily status and sex o f child; comparison o f children interviewed with chil dren in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Fam ily status and sex of child. Children inter viewed (Boston). Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 Parents living together............ - ........................... Father dead or not living with fam ily............ Mother dead or not living with fam ily............ Both parents dead or not living with fam ily. Status of one or both parents.not reported.. . 2,263 600 150 96 290 66.6 8.5 582 151 26 19 45 70.7 18.3 3.2 2.3 5.5 B oys.................................- ............................... 2,026 100.0 ~477 100.0 88 65.9 18.0 4.3 331 94 15 52 187 2.6 8 69.4 19.7 3.2 1.7 9.2 29 6.1 100.0 Both sexes............ ......................................... Parents living together......................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily............ Mother dead or not living with fam ily............ Both parents dead or not living with fam ily. Status of one or both parents not reported... 1,335 364 17.7 4.4 2.8 Girls.................................................................. 1,373 100.0 346 Parents living together......................................... Father dead or not living w ith fam ily............ Mother dead or not living with fam ily............ Both parents dead or not living with family. Status of one or both parents not reported... 928 236 62 44 103 67.6 17.2 4 .5 3.2 7.5 251 57 40 11 11 16 in both groups the proportion of cases in which the status of either one or both parents is not re ported is comparatively high; 8.5 per cent in the continuation-school group and 5.5 per cent in theschedule group for both sexes. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis \ 89 TH E FAMILIES. Many children doubtless went to work because of economic need caused by the death of the father or by the fact that, for some reason, he was not living with his family. Of all the children for whom continuation-school records were taken, about one-fifth— 20.5 per cent— belonged to broken families of this kind; 2.8 per cent did not live with either parent; and 17.7 per cent lived with their mothers, but had lost their fathers by death or desertion. Practically no dif ference was found between the girls and boys as to this point. The fact that the mother was dead or not living with the family seemed to have had much less influence in sending children to work. The mothers of only 7.2 per cent, as compared with the fathers of 20.5 per cent, of the children in the continuation-school group were dead or not living with their families. This percentage was some what higher for the girls, 7.7 per cent, than for the boys, 6.9 per cent. Approximately 1 child in 20, 4.4 per cent, lived with his father but had no mother, or none at home. Of the children who were interviewed a smaller proportion than of the Continuation-school children came from families in which the mother was dead or not living with the family, but a slightly larger proportion from families in which the father was dead or not living th the family. The differences between the two groups, however, are too slight to be significant. T a b l e 22.— Fam ily status, by sex and nativity o f child; children in B oston continuation school. All children. Fam ily status and sex of child. Both s e x e s ................................................... Native children. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. Foreign-born children. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. 1 3,399 100.0 2,761 100.0 637 100.0 1 2,263 600 150 96 290 66.6 17.7 4 .4 2 .8 8.5 1,810 513 127 78 233 65.6 18.6 4.6 2 .8 8.4 452 87 23 18 57 7L 0 13.7 3.6 2 .8 8.9 Boys.................... ............................................. 1 2,026 100.0 1 ,7 0 T 100.0 324 100.0 Parents living together.......................................... Father dead or not living with fa m ily .. , ___ Mother dead or not living w ith fam ily............ Both garents dead or not living w ith fa m ily Status, of one or both parents not reported... 1 1,335 364 88 52 187 65.9 18.0 4.3 2 .6 9.2 1,101 321 79 46 154 64.7 18.9 4.6 2.7 9.1 233 43 9 6 33 71.9 13.3 2 .8 1.9 10.2 1,373 100.0 1,060 100.0 313 100.0 928 236 62 44 103 67.6 Ì7.2 4.5 3.2 7.5 709 192 48 32 79 66.9 18.1 4.5 3.0 7.5 219 44 14 12 24 70.0 14.1 4.5 3.8 7.7 Parents living together.......................... ............... Father dead or not living with fam ily............ Mother dead or not living w ith fam ily............ } Both parents dead or not living with family Status of one or both parents not reported.. . Girls.............................................................. . rents living together.......................................... . ather dead or not living with fam ily. . . . ___ other dead or not living with fam ily............ . Both parents dead or not living w ith family. Status of one or both parents not reported___ 1 Including one boy for whom nativity was not reported, 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 7 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 90 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . When the native are compared with the foreign-born children, asin Table 22 for the continuation-school group, it is found that the proportion of working children who belonged to broken families was higher among the native than among the foreign born. The per centage of cases in which both parents were dead or not living with their families was precisely the same for both, but a somewhat smaller proportion of the foreign-born children lived in families where the mother only was missing, and a decidedly smaller proportion, 13.7 per cent as compared with 18.6 per cent for the native, in families where the father only was missing. Evidently the death of the father or the fact that he was, not living with his family was relatively more frequently a factor in the circumstances that led to the child’s employ ment among the native than among the foreign-born children. T able 23.— Fam ily status, by sex and nativity o f child and nativity o f father; children interviewed. Children. Fathers foreign born. N a tivity of fa Children Children for thers^ native. eign-born. notr port ed; chil Per Per Per Per N um cent N um cent N um cent N um cent dren ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri na bution. bution bution. bution. tive. Total. Fam ily status and s e i of child. Both sexes................•............ ..................... 823 Both fathers and children native. 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 127 100.0 Parents living together....................................... Father dead or not living w ith fam ily......... Mother dead or not living w ith fa m ily ......... Both parents dead or not living with family Status of one or both parents not reported.. 166 100.0 29 252 100.0 76 100.0 22 175 100.0 90 100.0 17 B o y s........................................... ................... 61.4 25.2 3.1 Parents living together................... .................. Father dead or not living w ith fam ily.......... Mother dead or not living w ith fam ily......... Both parents dead or not living with family Status of one or both parents not reported.. 29 Girls............................................................... 346 Parents living together....................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily.......... Mother dead or not living w ith fam ily........ Both parents dead or not living with fam ily Status of one or both parents not reported.. 100.0 .8 9.4 100.0 *74- 100.0 72.6 16.6 3.4 2.9 4.6 In this respect the native children of foreign-born fathers stand, as might be expected, about halfway between the foreign-born children and the native children of native fathers. Table 23 shqlj that, among the children who were interviewed, 16.9 per cent of th foreign-born children, 19.2 per cent of the native children whose fathers were foreign born, and 24.9 per cent, or almost exactly onefourth, of the native children of native parentage came from families without fathers. In every group except that of native children of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TH E FAMILIES. 91 oreign-born fathers a smaller proportion of the girls than of the boys came from such families.41 The father or mother may have died or deserted the family be tween the time the child became 14 and the date of his going to work, and thus the loss of a parent may often be the direct cause of the employment of a child even though such employment did not begin as soon as the child became of legal age to work. Nevertheless, Table 24 shows that 35.2 per cent of the continuation-school children whose fathers only were dead or not living with their families, as compared with 33 per cent of those whose parents were living together, left school to go to work before they were 14^ years of age. On the other hand, only 30.7 per cent of the children whose mothers were dead or not living with their families and 30.2 per cent of those both of whose parents were dead or not living with their families went to work at this age. T a b l e 24. A ge at talcing out first certificate, by fa m ily status,• children in B oston con tinuation school. Children taking out first certificate at specified age. Fam ily status. A ll chil dren. 14 under 14|. 14J under 15. 15 under 15|. 15J under 16. N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. Total.................................. ...................... Parents living together......................................... Father dead or not living w ith fam ily............ Mother dead or not living with fam ily........... Both parents dead or not living with fam ily Status of one or both parents not reported.. 3,399 1,151 33.9 710 20.9 732 21.5 806 23.7 2,263 600 150 96 290 747 211 46 29 118 33.0 35.2 30.7 30.2 40.7 485 134 33 29 29 21.4 22.3 22.0 30.2 10.0 504 128 27 21 52 22.3 21.3 18.0 21.9 17.9 527 127 44 17 91 23.3 21.2 29.3 17.7 31.4 In all these tables, however, the terms father and mother include stepfather and stepmother, so that the actual number of children who had lost one or the other parent by death is considerably greater than here shown. The death or desertion of the mother, as has been seen, appears to have affected comparatively few children. But if we eliminate the stepfathers, as in Table 25, it is found that the fathers of one-fifth, 20.7 per cent, of the children interviewed were dead. The proportion of children of native parentage whose fathers were dead is even higher, 24.4 per cent, or nearly one-fourth. This table shows, again, that the death of the father must have been less important as a cause of the employment of the child among the 'children of foreign parentage who, as already stated, had the larger roportion at work than among those of native parentage, and also less important among the south and east European races than among the north and west European races. « The slight differences between these groups in the proportion of cases in which the mother was dead or not living w ith the fam ily are based on too sm all numbers to be significant. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 92 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Among the children of all the different nationality groups, excep the Italian, the death of the father seems to show itself definitely as a cause of the employment of the child. An estimate, based on the death rates prevailing in the death registration area of the United States in 1910, shows that not more than 12.2 per cent of all children of 14 would normally have lost their fathers by death.42 Y et of all the children interviewed in the Boston continuation school 20.7 per cent had lost their fathers; and among those of native parentage this proportion rose to 24.4 per cent and among the Irish to 25.7 per cent. Even the children of the south and east European nationalities showed a slightly higher proportion, 13.8 per cent, of fatherless children than the estimate for the entire population. Only the children of Italian parentage, indeed, fell slightly below this estimate in the proportion of working children whose fathers were dead. Among all nationality groups except the Italian, therefore, children whose fathers were dead seem to have been more likely to go to work than children whoBe fathers were living. For the Italian group the figures suggest merely that children whose fathers were living were as likely to go to work as those whose fathers were dead. T a b l e 25.— Death o f father, by nationality; children interviewed. ChUdren whose fathers were dead. Nationality of father. AU clüldren. Stepfather. Total. N um ber. Per cent.® Total............................................. 823 170 20.7 Father native......................................... Father foreign horn......................... — 201 49 109 24.4 18.4 North and west Europe............... . 258 593 24.0 No step father. 149 Total. N ot Em Uving ployed. with family. 19 54 English..................................... Irish.......................................... Scotch...................................... . German.................................... Scandinavian........................... Other....................................... 37 South and east Europe...... .......... Russian Jewish........................ Other Jewish........................... Italian...................................... Other....................................... Asia, Syria..................................... North America.............................. 6 32 French Canadian.................... EngUsh and Scotch Canadian. NationaUty of father not reported....... 29 a N ot shown where base is less than 50. 6 Including 1 child the nationality of whose father was not specified. « Estim ated from the mortaUty during 14 years of males aged 30 as given in U . S . Life Tables, 1910. The estimate is purposely sUghtly overstated in assuming a rather high average age of fathers at the births of their children and in assuming that the mortality of males applied to married males. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 93 TH E FAMILIES. Desertion by the father, though not a frequent cause of child labor as compared with the death of the father, doubtless played its part in sending children from school to work, for the fathers of 21 of the 823 interviewed children, or 2.6 per cent, were not living with their families. OCCUPATION OF FATHER. Table 26 gives, according to the occupations of the fathers at the time the children went to work, the distribution of all the children interviewed whose fathers were living with their families. About T a b l e 26.- -Occupation o f father, and nativity o f father and child, by sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. Fathers foreign born. Occupation of father or stepfather and sex of child. B oth sexes......................... ....... B o y s ......... ............................... Girls....................... .......................... Father living with fam ily..................... Laborer (all industries).................. Skilled or semiskilled m echanic.. Factory operative............................. Merchant (including peddler)___ Other proprietor.............................. .. Clerical worker.................................* Teamster, driver, expressman__ Other..................................................... N ot em ployed............ . . ! ! ! . [. ” ! ! Father not living with fa m ily .............. Father dead................................................ N ot reported............... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 201 823 Father living with family.................... Laborer (all industries)................ Skilled or semiskilled mechanic. Factory operative........................... Merchant (includingpeddler)... Other proprietor.............................. Clerical worker................................. Teamster, driver, expressm an.. Other................... . . . . . . ................... N ot e m p lo y e d ................................ Father not living with fam ily ............ Father dead.............................................. N ot reported.. . . ___ .................. Father living with family...................... Labor (all industries)........ ............. Skilled or semiskilled nechanic. . Factory operative..................... Merchant (including peddler).. ! I Other proprietor................................ Clerical worker.-.............................V Teamster, driver, expressman. . . Other................... . . . . . . ..................... N ot employed.......................... Father not living with fam ily Father dead........................................ N ot reported......................... Both fathers and children native. Na tivity of Children Children father native. foreign born not re port Per Per Per ed; Per cent N um cent chil Num distri um cent N um cent distri Nber, distri distri dren ber. ber. ber. bu bu na bu bu tion. tion. tion. tion. tive. Total. 427 166 100.0 100.0 18.6 18.6 14.3 100.0 7.6 24.8 10.3 5.5 23.4 16.0 13.6 7.7 5.3 .3 9.8 8.0 1.6 8.2 4.9 2.8 13.1 5.5 9.7 21.4 12.4 12.8 477 127 19.5 15.0 21.8 11.3 6.8 .8 2.3 9.0 13.5 11.8 12.1 252 100.0 20.9 18.4 12.9 10.0 4.0 1.6 9.3 13.2 10.7 22 76 100.0 16.2 22.5 12.4 9.1 4.9 29 100.0 "Ì2 .4 10.9 10.4 100.0 22.0 20.3 18.6 10.2 11.9 1.7 1.7 5.1 8.5 11 346 74 100.0 21.8 13.3 17.0 6.6 4.8 1.5 6.6 12.9 15.5 175 100.0 14.3 17.9 14.-3 3.6 1.8 5.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 100.0 17.6 10.8 24.3 12.2 2.7 12.2 17.6 94 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . one-eighth, 12.8 per cent, of the children had unemployed fathers.^ Not far from one-fifth, 18.6 per cent, had fathers who were laborers, and the same proportion had fathers who were skilled or semiskilled mechanics. The fathers of 14.3 per cent were factory.operatives, of 8.2 per cent teamsters, drivers, and expressmen, and of 8 per cent merchants and peddlers. Very few, only 1.6 per cent of the children, had fathers who were clerical workers. Considerable difference was found between girls and boys in respect to the occupations of the fathers. In the first place, the unemploy ment of the father appears to have had more effect upon the employ ment of girls than of boys; although in general girls were less likely to go to work than boys, a larger proportion of the girls than of the boys who were interviewed, 15.5 per cent as compared with 10.7 per cent, had unemployed fathers. A considerably larger proportion of .the fathers of the girls, too, 21.8 per cent as compared with 16.2 per cent, were laborers, and a much smaller proportion, 13.3 per cent as compared with 22.5 per cent, were skilled or semiskilled mechanics. A smaller number of girls went to work, however, and it is interesting to note that the number of girls whose fathers were laborers, 59, is precisely the same as that of boys. Similarly the fathers of 46 girls and of 45 boys were factory operative's, making the proportion fc girls 17 per cent and for boys only 12.4 per cent. On the other hand the much larger numbers and proportions of boys whose fathers were skilled or semiskilled mechanics, merchants or peddlers, and team sters, drivers, or expressmen seem to indicate clearly a decidedly greater tendency among the sons than among the daughters of men in these occupations to go to work at an early age. Considerable difference was also found between the different nativity groups, the native children of native parentage having a larger proportion of fathers who were skilled or semiskilled operatives, those of foreign parentage a larger proportion who were laborers, and the foreign-born children larger proportions of fathers who were factory operatives and who were merchants or peddlers. Of the native children of native parentage approximately one-fourth, 24.8 per cent, had fathers who were skilled or semiskilled mechanics, and only 7.6 per cent had fathers who were laborers. On the other hand, nearly one-fourth, 23.4 per cent, of the native children of foreign parentage were children of laborers and only 16 per cent were children of skilled or semiskilled mechanics. The fathers of nearly as large a proportion of the foreign-born children, 15 per cent, as of the native^ children of foreign parentage were skilled or semiskilled mechanics and the fathers of a smaller proportion, only 19.5 per cent, as com-{ pared with 23.4 per cent, were laborers. But over one-fifth, 21.8 per cent, of the foreign-born children had fathers who were factory operatives, and the fathers of more than one-tenth, 11.3 per cent, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 95 TH E FAMILIES. were merchants or peddlers. Of the native children of native fathers only one-tenth, 10.3 per cent, and of the native children of foreign-born fathers only a little more than one-eighth, 13.6 per cent, were factory operatives. Comparatively few native children, more over, only 5.5 per cent of those whose fathers were native and 7.7 per cent of those whose fathers were foreign born, had fathers who were merchants or peddlers. UNEMPLOYED FATHERS. It is impossible to make even an estimate of the proportion of unemployed men in Boston during the period covered by this study. But the unemployment of the father of the family, like his desertion, seems to have been less, important as a cause of the child’s employ ment than his death. It has already been seen that about one-eighth, 12.8 per cent, of the interviewed children whose fathers were living with their families had unemployed fathers at the time they went to work. Table 27 shows, however, that this proportion was con siderably less, only 8.8 per cent, among the children included in the continuation-school group. As already stated, among the interviewed children a considerably larger proportion of girls than of boys, 15.5 per cent as compared with 10.7 per cent, had unemployed fathers. But this difference is decidedly less, 9.5 per cent as compared with 8.3 per cent, among the children for whom continuation-school records were used. T a b l e 27. — Em ploym ent o f father and sex o f child; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Children inter viewed. Status of father and sex of child. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. Both sexes........................................ . Father living w ith fam ily....................... Em p loyed............................................. . N ot employed....................................... Father dead or not living w ith family Father’s status not reported.................. Boys................................................... . 3,399 823 2,577 100.0 2,350 91.2 227 8.8 696 .................. 126 .................. 635 554 81 170 18 2,026 477 Father living w ith fam ily....................... E m ployed................................. : ......... . N ot employed....................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily Father’s status not reported................... 1,537 100.0 1,409 91.7 128 8.3 416 .................. 73 .................. 364 325 39 .4.. 1,373 346 1,040 100.0 941 90.5 99 9.5 280 .................. 53 .................. 271 229 42 Girls...................................................... Father living with fam ily........................ E m ployed.............................................. N ot employed...................................... Father dead or not living with fa m ily . Father’s status not reported.................... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 102 100.0 87.2 12.8 100.0 89.3 10.7 11 68 7 100.0 84.5 15.5 96 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The proportion of children who had unemployed fathers, according to Table 28, was about the same in each nativity group, though some what larger among the foreign-born children. This difference was due entirely to the fact that a considerably larger proportion of foreign-born girls than of foreign-born boys, 17.6 per cent as compared with 8.5 per cent, had unemployed fathers. In fact a smaller propor tion of the foreign-born boys than of any other group had fathers who were unemployed. Among the native children of native fathers the difference between the girls and boys in this respect was somewhat less than in any other nativity group. Evidently no definite conclu sion can be drawn as to the effect of the unemployment of their fathers in causing the children of the different nativity groups to go to work. T a b l e 28 .— E m p lo ym en t o f fa th er, and n a tiv ity o f fa th er and child, by sex o f ch ild; children in terview ed. EMPLOYED MOTHERS. Table 29 shows that of the children whose mothers were living with their families 15.8 per cent of the continuation-school group and 17.5 per cent of the interviewed group had mothers who were gainfully employed. In both groups a larger proportion of girls than of boys, among the interviewed children 19.6 per cent as compared with 15.9 per cent, had employed mothers. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 97 T H E F A M IL IE S . Considerable difference existed, according to Table 30, in*the tend ency of the different nativity groups as regards the employment of mothers of working children. It appears that, in families of the chil dren interviewed where the father was native born, the mother was more likely to have gone to work before the child was sent into industry than in those where the father was foreign born; and she was also more likely to have gone to work first in the families where the father was foreign born but the children native than in those where both fathers and children were foreign born. Of the children of native fathers about 2 in every 10, 20.3 per cent, had employed mothers, and the proportion for the native children of foreign-born fathers was nearly as high, 18.4 per cent. But of the foreign-born children less than 1 in 10, 9.7 per cent, had employed mothers. This difference between the nativity groups is probably in part due to a greater tend ency on the part of mothers whose children were born in this country to go to work themselves rather than send their children to work, but it may also have been due in part to the fact that in the families of recent immigrants the mothers perhaps more often had small children to care for at home. T a b l e 29.- -E m ploym en t o f mother and sex o f child; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school Children inter viewed (Boston). Status of mother and sex of child. Per cent Per cent distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. Number. Both sexes...................... Mother living with fam ily................ Em ployed..................................... N ot employed........................ Mother dead or not living with fam ily___ Mother’ s status not reported................. Boys.................................................................. .. Mother living with fa m ily .............. Em ployed..................................... N ot employed.................. ............. Mother dead or not living with fam ily___ Mother’ s status not reported............. Girls....................................................... Mother living with fa m ily . •.......... Em ployed..................................... N ot employed. . ...................... Mother dead or not living with fam ily___ Mother’s status not reported................... 3,399 823 2,941 464 2,477 246 212 2,026 100.0 15.8 84.2 = — ¡77” 1,740 260 1,480 140 146 100.0 14.9 85.1 427 68 359 23 27 100.0 17.0 83.0 306 60 246 22 18 — 1,373 1,201 204 997 106 66 733 128 605 45 45 100.0 17.5 82.5 ■■ - ' 100.0 15.9 84.1 346 100.0 19.6 80.4 The proportion of girls whose mothers were employed was greater han that of boys in each nativity group, except that of foreign-born children, where only 6.4 per cent of the girls but 13.4 per cent of the boys had employed mothers. But among the native children of foreign-born fathers 23.4 per cent of the girls as compared with only https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TH E W ORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. 98 14.9 per cent of the boys, and among the native children of nativefathers over one-fourth, 25.8 per cent, of the girls as compared with only 17.1 per cent of the boys had mothers who were employed. Evidently in families where the children were native, even when the fathers were foreign born, the mothers more frequently preceded the daughters than the sons in gainful employment. T able 3 0 . — Em ploym ent o f mother, by nativity o f father and child, and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. N a tiv ity of fath ers Children Children not foreign bom . native. re port ed; Per Per chil cent cent N um distri N um distri dren na ber. ber. bu bu tive. tion. tion. Fathers foreign b om . Total. B oth fathers and children native. Status of mother and sex of child. Per Per cent cent Num distri N um distri ber. ber. bu bu tion. tion. Both sexes.................................................... 823 Mother living with fam ily................................. Em ployed............ — ............- . - - — — N ot employed................................................ Mother dead or not living with fam ily------Mother’s status not reported............................. 733 128 605 45 45 B o y s................................................... ........... 477 Mother living with fam ily................................. Em ployed........................................................ N ot em ployed................................................. Mother dead or not living with fam ily......... Mother’ s status not reported............................. 427 68 359 23 27 Girls................................................................ 346 Mother living with fam ily............................... Em ployed.................................... ................. N ot employed.................................- ............ Mother dead or not living with fam ily------ 306 60 246 22 18 177 36 141 8 16 100.0 20.3 79.7 111 19 92 5 11 100.0 17.1 82.9 66 17 49 3 228 34 194 14 10 100.0 25.8 74.2 158 37 121 11 6 145 14 131 9 12 100.0 9.7 90.3 100.0 14.9 85.1 67 9 58 3 6 1 100.0 13.4 86.6 78 5 73 6 6 21 6 15 1 7 90 100.0 23.4 76.6 25 7 IiT 3 22 76 175 74 100.0 19.6 80.4 100.0 18.4 81.6 252 127 100.0 15.9 84.1 386 71 315 25 16 29 166 427 201 100.0 17.5 82.5 100.0 6 .4 93.6 4 1 3 2 1 5 The preceding comparisons relate only to children whose mothers were known to be living with their families. Table 31, on the other hand, shows that of all the interviewed children, including also those whose mothers were dead or not living with their families or whose mothers’ status was not known, only 15.6 per cent had employed mothers. Yet the proportion of working mothers rose to 25.9 per cent among the children whose fathers were unemployed and to 40 per cent among the children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families. Moreover, the latter group had an unusuallylarge proportion, 11.2 per cent, of mothers who were also dead cr not living with their families, so that less than half, 44.7 per cent,' of these fatherless children had mothers at home and not employed. But of the children whose fathers were employed, 83.6 per cent, or https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T H E F A M IL IE S . 99 nearly twice as large a proportion, had mothers at home and not employed. Evidently the death, desertion, or unemployment of the father frequently led directly to the employment of the mother. T a b l e 31 .— Em ploym ent o f mother, by sta tu s'of father and sex o f child; children inter viewed. Children whose mother? were— Status of father and sex of child. A ll chil dren. F.mployed. N ot employed. N um Per N um ber. cent.1 ber. Dead or not living w ith family. Mother’s status not reported. Per N um Per N um - Per cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 Both sexes............................................ 823 128 15.6 605 73.5 45 5,5 45 5.5 Father em ployed........................ ............. Father not em ployed.................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily... Father’s status not reported....................... 554 81 170 18 39 21 68 7.0 25.9 40.0 463 59 76 7 83.6 72.8 44.7 25 1 19 4.5 1.2 11.2 27 4.9 •7 11 4.1 B o y s......................................................... 477 68 14.3 359 75.3 23 4.8 27 5.7 Father em ployed......................................... Father not em ployed.................................... Father dead or not living with family .. Father’s status not reported....................... 325 39 102 11 25 7 36 7.7 82.5 14 1 8 4.3 18 5.5 35.3 268 31 55 5 7.8 3 6 2 .9 G i r l s . .. .. . ,* .......................................... 346 60 17.3 246 71.1 22 6.4 18 5.2 Father em ployed............................................. Father not em ployed.................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily... Father’s status not reported....................... 229 42 68 7 14 14 32 6.1 195 28 21 2 85.2 11 4.8 9 *3.9 30.9 11 16.2 4 5 .9 .-v 47.1 53.9 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. ECONOMIC NEED OF CHILD’S WORK. The figures which have been given relating to the families of the children tend to throw some indirect light upon the economic need for their gainful labor. Upon this point more direct evidence is furnished, however, b y the statements of the children themselves, which, though not to be wholly relied upon, probably reflect roughly the part played b y poverty in the transfer of the young children of Boston from school to industry. From one-third to two-fifths of the children, 32.7 per cent of those in the continuation-school group and 40.5 per cent of those in the interviewed group, stated that they had left school for economic reasons— that is, because their earnings were needed at home. Table 32 shows also that a larger proportion of girls than of boys left school for this reason. Of the girls interviewed, indeed, neatly half, 48.6 ^er cent, left school for economic reasons. Evidently the girls, more enerally than the boys, were kept in school unless their earnings were actually needed. Economic need as a reason for child labor appeared to decrease as the family’s length of residence in this country increased. Table 33 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 100 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . shows, for example, that of the Italian children who were inter viewed, nearly two-thirds, 63.7 per cent, of those who were them selves foreign born and only about one-half, 50.9 per cent, of those who were native born of foreign fathers, left school for economic reasons. On the other hand only about one-third, 33.2 per cent, of the native children of fathers from north and west Europe, the source of the earlier immigration, and but little more than one-third, 34.3 per cent, of the native children of native fathers, alleged economic necessity as a reason for leaving school. To a certain extent, how ever, this result may have been influenced by more frequent un willingness on the part of native children of native fathers to confess to economic need even when such need actually existed. T a b l e 32.— Reason fo r leaving school, by sex; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Children interviewed (Boston). Reason for leaving school, and sex. Number. « Both sexes................................ * Economic reasons.............................. Other reasons................................... Reasons not reported........................ Boys......................................... Economic reasons.................................. Other reasons................................ Reasons not reported.......................... Girls.......................................... Economic reasons......................................... Other reasons....................................... Reasons not reported.................................. Per cent Per cent dis Number. dis tribution. tribution. 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 1,112 1,846 441 32.7 54.3 13.0 333 408 82 40.5 49.6 10.0 2,026 100.0 477 100.0 566 1,177 '283 27.9 58.1 14.0 165 262 50 34.6 54.9 10.5 1,373 100.0 346 100.0 546 669 158 39.8 48.7 11.5 168 146 32 48.6 42.2 9.2 In each group, except the native children of fathers from north and west Europe, a larger proportion of girls than of boys gave economic necessity as the reason for leaving school. The difference between the sexes in this regard is particularly striking among the native children of native fathers; in this group 44.6 per cent of the girls and only 28.3 per cent of the boys left school for this reason. Economic reasons for leaving school were given by a larger propor tion of the children whose fathers were unemployed than of those whose fathers were dead or not living with their families, 77.8 per_ cent as compared with 53.5 per cent. Table 34 shows also that chil dren of foreign parentage gave this reason as often as those of native parentage when their fathers were unemployed, but more often, in 56.4 per cent of the cases as compared with 52 per cent, when their fathers were dead or not living with their families. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 101 TH E FAMILIES. T a b l e 33.— Reason fo r leaving school, by nationality o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who left school because of— Nationality of father and nativity and sex of child. A ll chil dren. Economic reasons. Other reasons. Reasons not reported. N um Per N um Per N um Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 B oth sexes................................................................ 823 333 40.5 408 49.6 82 10.0 B oth fathers and children native................................ Fathers foreign born and children native................ Fathers’ nationalities: North and west Europe................................. Irish.................................. ............................ Other.............................................................. South and east Europe................................... Italian.............. ....................... ...................... Other.............................................................. Other...................................................................... B oth fathers and children foreign b o m .................... Fathers’ nationalities: North and west Europe.................................. Irish................................................................ Other............................................................. South and east E u ro p e ..t.............................. Italian............................................................ Other.............................................................. Other...................................................................... N ativity of fathers not reported; children native. 201 427 69 167 34.3 39.1 111 215 55.2 50.4 21 45 10.4 10.5 235 161 74 162 106 56 30 166 78 54 24 78 54 24 11 89 33.2 33.5 32.4 48.1 50.9 42.9 127 83 44 72 45 27 16 65 54.0 51.6 59.5 44.4 42.5 48.2 30 24 6 12 7 5 3 12 12.8 14.9 8.1 7.4 6.6 8.9 23 6 17 135 91 44 8 29 6 6 80 58 22 3 8 477 B oth fathers and children native................................ Fathers foreign born and children native................ Fathers’ nationalities: North and west Europe.................................. Irish.............................. ................................ Other............................................................. South and east Europe................................... Italian............................................................ Other......................................................... Other.......................................................... ............ B eth fathers and children foreign b o m .................... Fathers’ nationalities: North and west Europe................................... Irish..................................... . . ; ................... . Other.............................................................. South and east Europe................................... . Italian............................................................ Other............................................................... Other....................................................................... N ativity of fathers not reported; children native.. 53.6 39.2 7.2 1 59.3 63.7 16 6 10 44 29 15 5 17 165 34.6 262 54.9 50 10.5 127 252 36 91 28.3 36.1 77 134 60.6 53.2 14 27 11.0 10.7 147 96 51 85 51 34 20 76 49 32 17 36 21 15 6 34 33.3 33.3 33.3 42.4 41.2 82 51 31 41 24 17 11 37 55.8 53.1 60.8 48.2 47.1 16 13 3 8 6 2 3 5 10.9 13.5 5.9 9.4 11.8 18 5 13 57 34 23 1 22 3 3 31 19 12 Girls............................................................................. 346 168 48.6 B oth fathers and children native................................. Fathers foreign born and children native................. Fathers’ nationalities: N orth and west Europe................................... Irish.................................................................. Other....................'v......................................... South and east Europe..................................... Italian............................................ ................. O th er....................J....................................... Other........................................................................ B oth fathers and children foreign born...................... Fathers’ nationalities: North and West E u r o p e ................................. Irish.................................................................. Other................................................................ South and east Europe........................... ......... Italian...................................... ....................... Other................................................................ Other....................................................................... N ativity of fathers not reported; children n a tiv e .. 74 175 33 76 88 65 23 77 55 22 10 90 29 22 7 42 33 9 5 55 5 1 4 78 57 21 7 7 3 ,-sss B oys........................................................................... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 447 __ 48.7 1 11 4 7 8.1 4.4 4 6.6 1 38.6 1 4 2 2 146 42.2 32 9.2 44.6 43.4 34 81 45.9 46.3 7 18 9.5 10.3 33.0 33.8 45 32 13 31 21 10 5 28 51.1 49.2 14 11 3 4 1 3 15.9 16.9 31.1 7 7 .8 28.2 28.1 7 2 5 9.0 3.5 54.4 4 3 49 39 10 3 4 14 5 9 22 13 9 1 14 32.6 31.9 54.5 60.0 61.1 62.8 68.4 2 1 1 22 16 6 4 3 7.0 4 40.3 38.2 5.2 1.8 102 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. The contrast between girls and boys on this point is shown i Tables 35 and 36, which give the proportions of each sex among the children whose fathers and among those whose mothers were em ployed, unemployed, or dead or not living with their families. Of all the. children whose fathers were unemployed only 51.9 per cent were girls, yet of those with unemployed fathers who gave economic reasons for leaving school 54 per cent were girls. Similarly, of all the children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families only 40 per cent were girls, yet of the children of this group who gave economic reasons for leaving school 42.9 per cent were girls.43 Table 36 shows that, although of all the children whose mothers were em ployed only 46.9 per cent were girls, of those with employed mothers who gave economic reasons for leaving school 52.1 per cent were girls. That girls were more likely than boys to leave school only because of economic necessity is again shown in the fact that, although only 42 per cent of all the children were girls, of those who stated that they left school for economic reasons 50.5 per cent were girls. T a b l e 34,— Reason fo r leaving school, by status and nativity o f father; children inter viewed. Children who left school because of— Status and nativity of father. A ll chil dren. Economic reasons. Other reasons. Reasons not reported. N um Per N um Per N um Per ber. cent.« ber. cent.« ber. cent.® Total...........................................................- ............................... 823 333 40.5 408 49.6 82 10.0 Father em ployed................................................................................ Father not employed......................................................................... Father dead or not living with fam ily....................................... Father’ s status not reported........................................................... 554 81 170 18 176 63 91 3 31.8 77.8 53.5 323 16 63 6 58.3 19.8 37.1 55 2 16 9 9.9 2.5 9 .4 Father n a tiv e ...................... ....................................................... 201 «T 34.3 in Father employed................................................................................. 30 13 26 23.6 Father dead or not living with fam ily....................................... Father’ s status not reported........................................................... 127 18 50 6 Father foreign b o m .................................................................... 593 256 412 59 110 12 145 46 62 3 29 8 17 4 15 4 10 1 4 3 13 1 4 3 Father employed................................................................................ Father not employed...... .................................................................. Father dead or not living w ith fam ily....................................... Father’s status not reported........................................................... 55.2 21 10.4 81 5 22 3 63.8 16 12.6 44.0 2 3 4.0 43.2 280 47.2 57 ÖTö 35.2 78.0 56.4 229 11 37 3 55.6 18.6 33.6 38 2 11 6 9.2 37^ 10.0 52.0 — a Not shown where hase is less than 50. 43 Table 35 also shows, in another w ay, the fact already mentioned that the unem ploym ent of the father seems more often to have been a cause of the employment of the girl than of the boy. For, although only •42 per cent of all the children interviewed were girls, 51.9 per cent of those whose fathers were unemployed were girls. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 103 TH E FAMILIES. able 35.— Sex, by reason fo r leaving school, and status o f father; children interviewed. B oys. Reason for leaving school and status of father. Girls. Children. Number. Per cent.1 Number. Per cent.1 A ll reasons..... .................................. 823 477 58.0 346 42.0 Father employed............ .......................... Father not employed................................. Father dead or not living w ith family. Father’s status not reported................... 554 81 170 18 325 39 102 11 58.7 48.1 60.0 229~ 42 68 7 41.3 51.9 40.0 Economic reasons........................... 333 165 49.5 168 50.5 Father employed........................................ Father not employed................................ Father dead or not living with family. Father’s status not reported.................. 176 63 91 3 82 29 52 2 46.6 46.0 57.1 94 34 39 1 53.4 54.0 42.9 Other reasons.................................... 408 262 64.2 146 35.8 Father employed........................................ Father not employed................................ Father dead or not living with family. Father’s status not reported................... 323 16 63 6 209 8 42 3 64.7 114 8 21 3 35.3 Reasons not reported..................... Father employed........................................ Father not employed................................ Father dead or not living with fa m ily . Father’s status not reported.................. ■ 66.7 ___ ■ 33.3 82 50 61.0 32 39.0 55 2 16 9 34 2 8 6 61.8 21 38.2 8 3 —a N ot shown where base is less than 50. T a b l e 36.— Sex, by reason fo r leaving school, and status o f mother; children interviewed. Boys. Reason for leaving school and status of mother. . Girls. Children. Number. Per cent.1 Number. Per cent.1 A ll reasons............................... ....................................... 823 477 58.0 346 42.0 Mother employed...................................................................... Mother not employed.................................................. ........... Mother dead o f not living with fam ily............................ Mother’s status not reported.............. ’ ................................ 128 605 45 45 68 359 23 27 53.1 59.3 60 246 22 18 46.9 40.7 Economic reasons......................................................... 333 165 49.5 168 50.5 Mother employed.................................................................. .. Mother not*employed.............................................................. Mother dead o f not living with fam ily............................. Mother’s status not reported.................................................. 73 234 16 10 35 117 6 7 47.9 50.0 38 117 10 3 52.1 50.0 Other reasons.................................................................. 408 262 64.2 146 35.8 Mother employed...................................................................... Mother not employed.............................................................. Mother dead or not living with fam ily.............................. Mother’s status not reported.............. "................................ 43 322 25 18 27 209 15 11 64.9 16 113 10 7 35.1 Reasons not reported.................................................. 82 50 61.0 32 39.0 Mother em ployed................................... ................................ Mother not*employed.............................................................. Mother dead o f not living with fam ily............................. Mother’s status not reported.............. ................................. 12 49 4 17 6 33 2 9 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 16 2 S' TERMINATION OF SCHOOL LIFE. The next questions which arise relate to the child’s relationship to the school, to the age at which he left, the amount of school time lost between leaving and going to work, whether or not he began work during a vacation period, his specific reason for leaving, the grade he had completed, and whether he was in a higher grade than normal, a normal grade, or a grade lower than normal for his age. In considering these subjects it must be remembered that all the more detailed data in this study relate to the group of children interviewed, about three-fourths of whom, as compared with less than a third of all children taking out certificates, were less than 14^ years of age when they went to work. About 19 out of 20 o f these children, indeed, went to work before they were 15. Even among the children included in the continuation-school group, furthermore, a somewhat larger proportion took out certificates when under 15 years of age than among all those who took out certificates.44 AGE AT LEAVING SCHOOL. Naturally, because of the differences in age at going to work, a larger proportion of the interviewed children than of those included in the continuation-school group left school when less than 15 years of age. Table 37 shows, indeed, that 95.2 per cent of the inter viewed children left school before they were 15, and 18.7 per cent of them before they were 14. A larger proportion of girls than of boys, 21.4 per cent as compared with 16.8 per cent, left school before the age of 14. Even of the children in the continuation-school group 274, or 8.1 per cent, left school when under 14— 44, or 1.3 per cent, when under 13J years of age. In this group, too, girls showed a greater tendency than boys to leave school early. Children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families showed a tendency to leave school, as well as to go to work,45 younger than those from normal families. Although in some cases the death of the father or his separation from the family may have occurred when the child was over 15 and caused his employment at this later age. Table 38 shows that, in the group of children for whom con tinuation-school records were used, 63.1 per cent of those whose fathers alone were dead or not living with their families, as compared with 56.5 per cent of those whose parents were living together, left « See Table 17, p. 84. 104 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis <5 See pp. 89,91, 105 T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L LIFE, school before they were 15. Moreover, about 1 in 10, 10.8 per cent, of the fatherless children, as compared with only 7.6 per cent of the children from normal families, left school when under 14— 20 per cent before they were 13£ years of age. A similar tendency to go to work comparatively early is shown among the children both of whose parents were dead or not living with their families. T a b l e 37.— A ge at leaving school, by sex; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Children interviewed (Boston). Age at leaving school and sex. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu- Number. distribution. tion. Both sexes. 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 Under 14................. 14, under 15.......... 15, under 16.......... Not reported........ N ot leaving........... 274 1,657 1,125 142 201 8.1 48.7 33.1 4 .2 5.9 154 630 38 1 18.7 76.5 4.6 .1 B oys............ 2,026 100.0 477 100.0 Under 14................ 14, under 15.......... ' Sounder 16.......... Not reported____ Not leaving........... 133 938 711 105 139 6 .6 46.3 35.1 5.2 6 .9 80 373 23 1 16.8 78.2 4.8 .2 Girls............ 1,373 100.0 346 100.0 Under 14................ 14, under 15.......... 15, under 16.......... N ot reported........ Not leaving___ , . 141 719 414 37 62 10.3 52.4 30.2 2.7 4.5 74 257 15 21.4 74.3 4.3 T able 3 8 .— A ge at leaving school, by fa m ily status; children in B oston continuation school. Children leaving school at specified age. Fam ily statu s. Total. Under 13*. 13* under 14. 14 under 15. 15 under 16. N ot reported. Children not leaving school. Num Per N um Per N um P e r. N um Per Num Per N um ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. T o t a l ............... 3,399 Parents liv in g to gether.................... 2,263 Father dead or not livin g w ith fam ily. 600 Mother dead or not ^living w ith fam ily. 150 oth parents dead or not livin g w ith ^ fa m ily ........................ 96 Status of one or both parents notreporte d .................. .............. 290 44 1.3 230 6 .8 1,657 26 1.1 147 6 .5 1,107 48.9 12 2 .0 53 8 .8 314 52.3 1 0 .7 12 8 .0 69 2 2 .1 6 6 .3 4.1 3 4 94 7 0°— 22------ 8 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 .0 12 48.7 1,125 33.1 142 773 34.2 69 3 .0 169 2 3 .2 20 3 .3 46.0 54 3 6 .0 5 3 .3 57 59.4 24 25.0 3 3 .1 V. 110 37.9 105 36.2 45 15.5 4 .2 201 Per cent. 5.9 106 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . SCHOOLTIME LOST. If a child became 14 during a vacation, however, he may have left school before that age without any violation of the compulsoryattendance law. Of much greater significance, therefore, than whether or not he left school before he was 14 is the length of the period during the school term between the date of his leaving school and the date of his going to work. This interval between leaving school and going to work usually meant48 time lost which, according to law, should have been spent in school. T a b l e 39.— A m ou n t o f school time lost, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex of child; children interviewed. Children. Total. School tim e lost and sex of child. B oth fathers and children native. Fathers foreign born. NativityChildren native. Children foreign born. Per Per Per Per Num cent N um cent N um cent N um cent ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri bution bution bution bution A ll children......................................... 823 Children who lost during interval be tween leaving school and going to work specified am ount of school tim e (interval wholly or partly during school term )................................................ « 600 341 None or less than 1 w eek........................... 258 One week or m ore........................................ 135 1 week under 1 m on th ........................ 77 1 m onth under 3 m onths.................... 28 3 months under 6 m onths.................. 18 6 m onths or over................................ Children w ith interval entirely during 223 vacation........................................................ B o y s....................................................... 477 Children who lost during interval be tween leaving school and going to work specifiedamountof schooltime (interval wholly or partly during school term )................................................ o355 222 None or less than 1 w eek........................... 132 One week or m ore........................................ 78 I week under 1 m onth........................ 38 1 month under 3 m onths.................... 10 3 m onths under 6 m onths.................. 6 m onths or over................................... 6 Children w ith interval entirely during 122 vacation........................................................ Girls....................................................... Children who lost during interval be tween leaving school and going to work specified amount of schooltime (interval wholly or partly during school term )................................................ None or less than 1 w eek........................... One week or m ore......................................... 1 week under 1 m on th ........................ 1 month under 3 m onths.................... 3 months under 6 m onth s................. 6 m onths or over................................... Children w ith interval entirely during vacation........................................................ 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 166 100.0 72.9 41.4 31.3 16.4 9.4 3 .4 2.2 157 88 69 32 18 11 8 78.1 43.8 34.3 15.9 9 .0 5.5 4 .0 296 168 128 70 42 11 5 69.3 39.3 30.0 16.4 9 .8 2.6 1.2 a 124 74.7 45.2 28.9 15.1 8 .4 2 .4 3 .0 75 48 25 14 4 5 27.1 44 21.9 131 30.7 42 25.3 100.0 127 100.0 252 100.0 76 100.0 74.4 46.5 27.7 16.4 8 .0 2.1 1.3 100 62 38 23 8 5 2 78.7 48.8 29.9 18.1 6 .3 3 .9 1.6 180 112 68 38 24 3 3 71.4 44.4 27.0 15.1 9 .5 1.2 1.2 «58 39 18 12 4 1 1 76.3 51.3 23.7 15.8 5 .3 1.3 1.3 25.6 27 21.3 72 28.6 18 23.7 100.0 346 100.0 74 100.0 175 100.0 90 245 119 126 57 39 18 12 70.8 34.4 36.4 16.5 11.3 5.2 3 .5 57 26 31 9 10 6 6 77.0 35.1 41.9 12.2 13.5 8.1 8.1 116 56 60 32 18 8 2 66.3 32.0 34.3 18.3 10.3 4.6 1.1 66 36 30 13 10 3 4 73.3 40.0 33.3 14.4 11.1 3.3 4 .4 101 29.2 17 23.0 59 33.7 24 26.7 Including 1 boy for whom amount of schooltime lost was not reported. In some cases the children m ay have obtained special home permits. See pp. 2 and 364. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis fathers not ported; children native. T E K M IN A T IO N OF SCH OO L L IF E . 107 Nearly one-third of the interviewed children, 31.3 per cent, lost one week or more of schooltime during their transfer from school to work. This proportion, as shown in Table 39, was even higher. 34.3 per cent, among the native children of native fathers, and was lowest, 28.9 per cent, among the foreign-born children. Less than a month was lost by 16.4 per cent of the children, but nearly one tenth, 9.4 per cent, lost from one to three months, 3.4 per cent from three to six months, and 2.2 per cent six months or more. More girls than boys lost schooltime, for of the girls over onethird, 36.4 per cent, and of the boys only 27.7 per cent had an interval of one week or more between leaving school and going to work. The girls, moreover, lost larger amounts of time for, though the proportion of girls who lost one week but under one month is about the same as that of boys, 11.3 per cent of the girls as com pared with 8 per cent of the boys lost from one to three months, 5.2 per cent as compared with 2.1 per cent of the boys lost from three to six months, and 3.5 per cent as compared with 1.3 per cent of the boys lost six months or more. This loss of time was even greater among the native girls whose fathers were also native than among those whose fathers were foreign born or among the foreign’ orn girls. Over two-fifths, 41.9 per cent, of the native girls whose ^fathers were native lost a week or more, and considerably more than one-fourth, 29.7 per cent, lost a month or more of school time during the transition from school to work. SEASON AND MONTH OF GOING TO WORK. A t the time of this study promotions in the Boston schools took place only in June, and, therefore, children who went to work at any time during the school year either did so without having finished the grade which they had last begun, or else had failed to attend school as required by law. Yet, according to Table 40, nearly three-fourths, 72.8 per cent, of the children interviewed went to work during the school year. As the school year constitutes about threefourths of the calendar year this means that nearly, though not quite, as many children took their first positions during a school term as would have been the case if the dates of taking positions had been evenly distributed throughout the year. Nevertheless, these children did go to work somewhat more fre quently during the summer vacation than at other times, for a lit tle over one-fourth of them, 27.2 per cent, took their first regular ositions during this period. But even this slightly greater tendency o go to work during the summer than at any other time showed itself https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 108 THE WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. entirely among the girls, of whom 29.8 per cent went to work at tha« season as compared with almost exactly one-fourth, 25.4 per cent, of the boys. In all the nativity groups, except the Irish, the girls were more likely than were the boys to take their first positions dur ing a summer vacation. T a b l e 40.— Time o f securing first regular p o sitio n b y nationality o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who-went to work— Nationality of father, nativity and sex of child. A ll children. During summer vacation. A t some other time. Num ber. Per cent.1 Num ber. Percent.1 Both sexes................................................................... B oth fathers and children native.................................... Fathers foreign born and children native.................... Fathers of English-speaking nationalities. . — Irish........................................................................... Other....................................................- ............. .. - Fathers of non-English speaking nationalities.. Italian— ................................................................ Other....................................................... .. — . . . . B oth fathers and children foreign born........................ Fathers of English-speaking nationalities........... Irish............................................................................ Other........................................................ ............... Fathers of non-English speaking nationalities.. Italian....................................................................... Other......................................................................... N ativity of fathers not reported; children native .. B oys............................. ................................................. 823 224 201 2427 222 161 61 204 106 78.1 69.3 66.7 68.3 62.3 72.1 71.7 72.4 74.7 25.5 74.5 1 78.0 68.5 31.5 477 121 25.4 356 346 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Including one boy the nationality of whose father was not specified. 74.6 20.5 28.6 32.8 32.3 79.5 71.4 67.2 67.7 23." 7' 25.4 23.7 *76." 3 78.4 74.6 76.3 23.0 77.0 21.6 Both fathers and children native.................................. Fathers foreign born and children native.................. Fathers of English-speaking nationalities......... Irish ...'.................................................................... Other....................................................................... Fathers of non-English speaking nation alities. Italian...................................................................... Other...................................................................... Both fathers and children foreign born...................... Fathers of English-speaking nationalities......... Irish.................................... ..................................... Other................................ '. .................................... Fathers of non-English speaking nationalities. Italian...................................................................... Other.......................... ............................................ N ativity of fathers not reported; children native.. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 72.8 21.9 30.7 33.3 31.7 37.7 27.9 28.3 27.6 25.3 22.0 B oth fathers and children native.......... — .— Fathers foreign born and children native................... Fathers of English-speaking nationalities........... Irish........................................ ..................... ............. Other.......................... .............................................. Fathers of non-English speaking nationalities.. Italian....................................................................... Other......................................................................... Both fathers and children foreign b o m ...................... . Fathers of English-speaking nationalities......... Irish .................................................................... .. Other....................................................................... Fathers of non-English speaking nationalities. Italian.............. ......................................... ............. Other.................... ................................................... N ativity of fathers not reported; children native.. Girls...... .............................. ....................................... 27.2 29. 243 70.2 24.3 33.7 34.1 30.8 75.7 66.3 65.9 69.2 *33." 3' 34.5 "¿6.7 65.5 *26." 7 73.3 27.4 22.8 109 T E R M IN A T IO N - OF SCH O O L L IF E . Taking both sexes together, however, the native children of foreignborn fathers, and particularly the Irish, were more likely to go to work during the vacation period than were the foreign-born children and decidedly more so than the native children of native fathers. Of the native children of foreign-born fathers 30.7 per cent, of the foreign-born children 25.3 per cent, and of the native children of native fathers only 21.9 per cent went to work during a summer vacation. Of the native children of foreign-born fathers of Englishspeaking nationalities, indeed, one-third, 33 per cent, instead of only the one-fourth which would be expected if the dates of going to work were evenly distributed throughout the year, went to work during the vacation period. T a b l e 41. — Time o f securing first reqular position, by status o f father and sex o f child: children interviewed. Children who went to work. Status of father and sex of child. A ll children. During summer vacation. A t some other time. Number. Per cent.1 Number. Per cent.1 Both sexes............... ............................. 823 Father employed............................................ Father not employed . .................................. Father dead or not living with fam ily... Father’ s status not reported....................... B o y s........................................................ 27.2 72.8 28.7 71.3 79.0 74.1 21.0 25.9 477 25.4 Father employed............................................ Father not em ployed.................................... Father dead or not living with family . . Father’ s status not reported....................... ^ Girls......................................................... 346 103 29.8 243 Father em ployed............................................ Father not em ployed.................................... Father dead or not living ■with fam ily . Father’ s status not reported....................... 1 Not shown where base is less than 50, The fact that even less than one-fourth of the native children of native fathers seem to have taken their first positions during the long summer vacation is primarily due to the small proportion, 20.5 per cent, of the boys of this group who went to work during that period. Nevertheless the girls, instead of counteracting the tendency of the boys, showed a trifle less than the expected percentage, 24.3 per cent, going to work during the summer vacation. No other group shows so large a proportion who went to work at some time during the school term or during short vacations. It might be surmised that this was due to a greater tendency among native children of native parentage to take a vacation during the summer and wait until autumn, when https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 110 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . they would otherwise be obliged to return to the school room, be fore securing positions. American-born parents are often said to be more indulgent toward their children than foreign-born parents, and it has already been shown that, according to the child’s statement of his reasons for leaving school, economic pressure was more common in the families where the father was foreign born. But, as will be seen later, it appears to be due, primarily, not to this cause but to a greater tendency on the part of native children of native parentage, particularly boys, to go to work in the spring before school has closed.47 Children whose fathers were unemployed were, naturally, more likely to go to work during the school year than those whose fathers were employed. Table 41 shows that only 21 per cent of the children of unemployed fathers, as compared with 28.7 per cent of the children of employed fathers, took their first positions during a summer vaca tion. On the other hand, of the children whose fathers were dead or not living with their families practically as large a proportion, 25.9 per cent, went to work during a summer vacation period as would be expected if the fact that school was in session had no in fluence whatever. It may be that the economic stress caused b y unemployment is more immediately pressing than that caused by the death or desertion of the father which in many cases, doubtless, had occurred some time before the child became of age to work. That many children who did not go to work during the summer took positions soon after school had begun in September, apparently to avoid going back to school, appears clearly in Table 42, which gives the number and proportion of children going to work in each month of the summer vacation and in each month of the school term. As June and September belong in part to the vacation and in part to the school period, these two months appear in each list. Yet during the school term part of September a larger number of children went to work than during any other complete month except June. About one-eighth, 12.9 per cent, of the interviewed children went to work in September after school had opened, whereas only 13.1 per cent went to work during the entire month of June, both before and after the closing of school. If the numbers of children who went to work in September both before and after school opened are added, it is found that not far from one-fifth, 17.4 per cent, of all the children went to work in that month alone.® *i See Table 42, pp . 112-113. “ For the children who were interviewed, first regular position means the first position held afte leaving school, regardless of certification; the large number of children going to work in September can not, therefore, be a reflection of any peculiarity in the employment-certificate records bu t m ust repre sent the actual fact. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N OP SC H O O L L IF E . Ill After September and June, May had the largest number of children going to work, 10.4 per cent, and April came next with 9.8 per cent, precisely the same proportion as went to work after school had closed in June. Many children, apparently, left school shortly before the end of the session in order to secure the better positions before the closing of the schools released other applicants. During November and the three winter months—December, January, and February— fewer children went to work than during any other month except August, which was even less popular for entering industry than either December or February. Evidently the children who did not go to work during the- early part of the vacation were likely to wait until after school had begun in September. The girls showed an even greater tendency than the boys to go to work rather than return to school in the fall. Of the girls 15.6 per cent and of the boys only 10.9 per cent went to work in September after school had opened. The girls, however, showed much less tend ency than the boys to leave school for work during April and May, the two months during which almost exactly one-fourth, 24.9 per cent, of the boys took their first positions. In part this may be due to the fact that in the spring more opportunities, especially for outdoor 'Work, are opened to boys than to girls. In part it may be due to more pronounced cases of “ spring fever” among boys than among girls. The tendency to leave school for work in April and May was de cidedly more pronounced among the children of native than among those of foreign-born fathers and also more pronounced among the boys than among the girls whose fathers were native. Among these girls, moreover, the movement into industry seems to have begun in March, when 10.8 per cent of them went to work, to have fallen to 6.8 per cent in April, and to have risen again to 12.2 per cent in May. But 30 per cent of the boys whose fathers were native went to work in April and May alone, and not far from half, 45 per cent, of them went to work during the four months from February to May, inclu sive. Of the boys whose fathers were foreign born, on the other hand, only 34.5 per cent, or very few more than would be expected if the dates of going to work were evenly distributed throughout the year, went to work during these four months. The Russian Jewish children, indeed, seem to have entirely resisted this tendency to leave school for work in large numbers in the spring; they showed, moreover, less tendency than any other nationality group to go to work in the middle of a school year. At the same time the proportion of children who went to work in September after school had opened was practically the same in each nationality group. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 112 T a b l e 42.— M onth o f going to w ork1 in first regular position ,by nativity and nationality o f father and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children of foreign-born fathers. A ll children. Children of na tive fathers. Total. Month of going to work in first regular posi tion and sex. N um Per cent distri ber. bution. N um Per cent distri ber. bution. Italian. N um ber. Percent distri bution. Russian Jewish. Num Per cent distri ber. bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution.2 Children the nativity of whose fathers Per cent was not distri reported. bution. Other. N um ber. Both se x e s..................................................... 823 100.0 201 100.0 8 593 100.0 167 100.0 197 100.0 70 100.0 158 100.0 During summer vacation..................................... J u n e..................................................................... J u ly ........ ............................................................ A u g u st................................................................ Septem ber......................................................... A t some other tim e ................................................ January............................................................... F ebruary........................................................... M arch.................................................... A p r il.................................................................... M a y ................................................................ J u n e..................................................................... Septem ber......................................................... October........................................................... N ovem ber....................................... .................. December........................................................ 224 81 61 45 37 599 42 48 60 81 86 27 106 61 40 48 27.2 9.8 7.4 5.5 4.5 72,8 5.1 5.8 7.3 9.8 10.4 3.3 12.9 7.4 4.9 5.8 44 17 8 6 13 157 10 14 17 24 28 2 27 11 10 14 21.9 8.5 40 3.0 6.5 78.1 5.0 7.0 8.5 11.9 13.9 1.0 13.4 5.5 5.0 7.0 173 64 50 37 22 8 420 32 30 41 8 51 55 25 77 46 30 33 29.2 10.8 8.4 6.2 3.7 70.8 5.4 5.1 6.9 8.6 9.3 4.2 13.0 7.8 5.1 5.6 54 15 18 14 7 113 8 10 10 15 16 9 22 8 7 8 32.3 9.0 10.8 8.4 4.2 67.7 4.8 6 .0 6.0 9.0 9.6 5.4 13.2 4.8 4.2 4 .8 50 20 10 14 6 147 14 7 15 17 23 6 25 21 9 10 25.4 10.2 5.1 7.1 3.0 74.6 7.1 3.6 7.6 8.6 11.7 3.0 12.7 10.7 4.6 5.1 26 14 5 5 2 44 2 5 5 3 2 3 9 5 5 5 •37.1 20.0 7.1 7.1 2.9 62.9 2.9 7.1 7.1 4.3 2.9 4.3 12.9 7.1 7.1 7.1 43 15 17 4 7 115 s 8 11 15 14 7 21 12 9 10 27.2 9. 5 10.8 2.5 4.4 72.8 5.1 ' 5.1 7.0 9.5 8.9 4 A 13.3 7.6 5.7 6.3 B o y s...................................................... .......... 477 100.0 127 100.0 8 328 100.0 101 100.0 85 100.0 40 100.0 101 100.0 During summer vacation............................ ........ J u n e.................................................................... J u ly ...................................................................... A u g u st.............................................. „ ............... Septem ber..................................... - .................. A t some other tim e ................................................ January.............................................................. February......................................... ................. M arch..*............................................. ............... A p r il.......................................................... ....... M a y ..................................................................... J u n e..................................................................... Septem ber.........................; ............................ 121 45 36 25 15 356 21 31 33 63 56 17 52 25.4 9.4 7.5 5.2 3.1 74.6 44 6 .5 6.9 13.2 11.7 3.6 10.9 26 13 5 4 4 101 7 10 9 19 19 1 17 20.5 10.2 3.9 3.1 3.1 79.5 5.5 7.9 7.1 15.0 15.0 0.8 13.4 90 32 28 20 10 8 238 14 18 23 8 38 34 16 34 27.4 9.8 8.5 6.1 3.0 72.6 4.3 5.5 7.0 11.6 10.4; 4.9i 10.4! 33 8 12 10 3 68 5 6 4 13 11 5 10 32.7 7.9 11.9 9.9 3.0 67.3 5.0 5.9 4.0 12.9 10.9 5.0 9.9 18 10 3 4 1 67 6 4 9 9 13 4 '5 21.2 11.8 3.5 4.7 1.2 78.8 7.1 4.7 10.6 10.6 15.3 4.7 5.9 14 6 4 3 1 26 1 3 3 1 25 8 24 3 7.9 3 5 76 2 5 7 14 10 5 14 3 0 5 0 75 2 2.0 5 0 0 Q https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis f 2 5 5. 0 13.9 29 7 3 2 2 22 4 2 6 3 2 4 1 22 17 1 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, N um Per cent distri ber. bution. Irish. October.......................... N ovem ber.................... ' Decem ber...................... G irls................ ........... 346 74 2 Rate not shown where base is less than 50. 8 Including one boy ,the nationality of whose father was not specified, 100.0 100.0 66 100.0 9.4 5. 9 4.7 112 100.0 30 32 10 7 10 5 80 8 3 6 8 10 2 20 13 4 6 28.6 8.9 6 .2 8.9 4.5 71.4 7.1 2.7 5.4 7.1 8.9 1.8 17.9 11.6 3.6 5.-4 12 8 1 2 1 18 1 2 2 2 2 1 4 1 3 4 2 5 100.0 7 7 5 6 .9 6 .9 5.0 57 100.0 7 18 7 8 1 2 39 6 3 4 1 4 2 7 5 2 5 31.6 12.3 14.0 1. 8 3.5 68.4 10. 5 5.3 7.0 1. 8 7 .0 3 .5 12.3 8.8 3 .5 8.8 2 ) 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 In determining the study were T E R M IN A T IO N - OF SCH O O L L IF E . During summer vacation. J u n e................................. Ju ly.................................. A u gu st............................ S e p tem b er................... A t some other tim e ............ January.......................... February....................... M arch.............................. A p ril................................ M a y .................................’ Ju ne........................... Septem ber..................... October........................... N ovem ber....................’ December................... 5 4 U 3 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 114 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . try in the spring, rather than any greater tendency to save themselves from school by going to work in the autumn, which accounts for the large proportion of native children of native fathers who dropped their school careers without stopping even to finish the grades they were in. It may be that these children are more likely to leave school in the spring if they fear they will not be promoted than are the children of foreign-born fathers. But whatever the reason, the children who were interviewed had left school in large numbers from one to three months before the end of the school year when promo tions were to take place. REASONS FOR LEAVING SCHOOL. The economic reasons for leaving school have already been dis cussed. Many other reasons, however, were given by the children who were interviewed, and these have been classified and the number and proportion of children giving each type of answer are shown in Table 43. Although the replies may not be as accurate on this as on most points, and although one-tenth of the children failed to give any reason, the replies obtained seem sufficiently significant to make a classification worth while. ^ a About one-fifth, 20.2 per cent, of all the children were discontented with school, either because they disliked their school or their teacher or because of their slow progress or nonpromotion. A few children, 4 per cent of the .total, stated that they had finished the eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school. Others, 12.3 per cent of the total, gave as a reason for leaving school merely that they wished to work. Many of the children, of course, who preferred to work rather than attend school were doubtless influenced by discontent with school, but, on the other hand, discontent with school may have been caused by the desire to go to work. Discontent with school was given as a reason for leaving more often by native children of both native and foreign-born fathers than by foreign-born children. As fewer foreign-born children had finished the eighth grade this fact was less frequently given by them as a rea son for leaving school than by either group of native-born children. Moreover, although 17.4 per cent of the native children of native fathers stated merely that they wished to work, this reply was given by only 11.2 per cent of the native children of foreign-born fathers and by only 7.8 per cent of the foreign-born children. On the other hand, the fact that the parents wished the child to work was given a~ a reason by only 3.5 per cent of the native children of native father^ but by 6.3 per cent of those of foreign-born fathers and by 5.4 per cent of the foreign-born children. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 110 T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L L IF E . -T a b l e 43.— Reason fo r leaving school, by nativity offath er and nativity, and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. Fathers foreign b o m . Total. Reason for leaving school, and sex. N um ber. Both sexes............................................. Economic reasons........................................... A ll other reasons............... . . . ! . ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Discontent w ith schooi. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Disliked school or teacher............. Slow progress or nonpromotion.. Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school_________ Other reasons............................................. Child wished to work___ Parent wished child to work........ Illness of child.................................... Illness in fam ily........................... Other reasons........................... ......... Not reported............................. .......................... B o y s......................................................... Economic reasons............................................. A ll other reasons................... Discontent with schooi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Disliked school or teacher.............. Slow progress or nonprom otion.. Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school................... Other reasons............................................. Child wished to w o r k ! ! ! . ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Parent wished child to w o rk ... Illness of child.................................... Illness in fam ily.........................! ! ! ! Other reasons................... ................. Not reported.................................! . ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Girls..................................... Economic reasons............................................. A ll other reasons.................... ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Discontent with school! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Disliked school or teacher............. Slow progress or nonpromotion. . Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school.................... Other reasons.............................................. Child wished to work................ ! ! ! Parent wished child to work........ Illness of child.................................... Illness in fam ily............................. . ! Other reasons............. .............. N ot reported....................... ..................... Both fathers and children native. Per cent N um dis ber. tribu tion. Children native. Children foreign born. Per Per cent cent dis N um dis N um ber. ber. tribu tribu tion. tion. 823 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 333 408 166 100 66 40.5 49.6 20.2 12.1 8 .0 69 111 45 27 18 3473” .1 6 7 55.2 215 22.4 94 13.4 54 9 .0 40 39.1 50.4 22.0 12.6 9.4 33 209 101 45 12 10 41 82 4 .0 25.4 12.3 5 .5 1.5 1.2 5.0 10.0 8 58 35 7 4 4 8 21 4 .0 28.9 17.4 3 .5 2 .0 2 .0 4 .0 10.4 19 102 48 27 2 4 21 45 4 .4 23.9 11.2 6 .3 0 .5 0.9 4.9 10.5 477 100.0 127 100.0 252 165 262 109 64 45 34.6 54.9 22.9 13.4 9 .4 36 77 33 22 11 28.3 60.6 26.0 17.3 8.7 91 134 62 33 29 16 137 73 29 8 2 25 50 3 .4 28.7 15.3 6.1 1.7 0 .4 5.2 10.5 5 39 27 5 3 3.9 30.7 21.3 3 .9 2 .4 4 14 346 100.0 168 146 57 36 21 48.6 42.2 16.5 10.4 6.1 17 72 28 16 4 8 16 32 4 .9 20.8 8.1 4 .6 1.2 2 .3 4 .6 9 .2 3 19 8 2 1 4 4 7 166 Per cent dis tribu tion. Na tivity of fathers not re ported; chil dren native. 100.0 29 53.6 39.2 14.5 10.8 3 .6 8 17 3 1 2 4 37 13 9 6 1 8 -1 2 2 .4 22.3 7.8 5.4 3.6 0 .6 4.8 7.2 2 12 5 2 100.0 76 100.0 22 36.1 53.2 24.6 13.1 11.5 34 37 12 9 3 44.7 48.7 15.8 11.8 3 .9 4 14 2 3 .2 25.4 13.1 6 .0 0.4 0.8 5 .2 .10.7 1 24 8 7 4 1.3 31.6 10.5 9 .2 5.3 2 10 5 2 3 .2 11.0 8 64 33 15 1 2 13 27 5 5 6 .6 6 .6 3 4 74 100.0 175 100.0 9Ö" 100.0 7 33 34 12 5 7 44.6 45.9 16.2 6 .8 9 .5 76 81 32 21 11 43.4 46.3 18.3 12.0 6.3 55 28 12 9 3 61.1 31.1 13.3 10.0 3 .3 4 3 1 1 4.1 25.7 10.8 2 .7 1.4 5 .4 5 .4 9 .5 11 38 15 12 1 2 8 18 6.3 21.7 8.6 6 .9 0 .6 1.1 4.6 10.3 3 13 5 2 2 1 3 7 3 .3 14.4 5.6 2 .2 2 .2 1.1 3 .3 7.8 89~ 65 24 18 6 1 4 4 2 2 1 1 The girls, as already stated, gave economic reasons for leaving school jn a much larger proportion of cases than did the boys. All the other reasons, therefore, were less frequently given by girls. Only 16.5 per cent of the girls, for example, as compared with 22.9 per cent of the boys, gave discontent with school as a reason for leaving; and only 8.1 per cent of the girls, as compared with 15.3 per cent of the boys, stated merely that they wished to work. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 116 T a b l e 44.— A m ount o f schooltime lost, hy reason fo r leaving school and sex; children interviewed. Children who lost specified amount of school tim e during interval between leaving school and going to work. W Reasons for leaving school, and sex. B oth sexes...................................................................... 2 823 None or less than 1 week (in terval wholly or partly during school term ). Other reasons............................................................ Num ber. Per cen t.1 2.2 223 27.1 1.2 3.4 .6 1.0 99 94 42 25 17 207 23.0 25.3 25.0 25.8 15 37 18 7 17.7 17.8 Per cent.1 Num ber. 341 41.4 258 31.3 135 16.4 77 9.4 28 3.4 18 30 40 17 9 8 9.0 9.8 10.2 9.0 12.1 1 25 7 6 1 .3 6.1 4.2 6.0 1.5 4 14 1 1 9 9 4.3 2 11 2 5.3 2.0 Economic reasons.................................................................... A ll other reasons...................................................................... Discontent with school................................................. Disliked school or teacher.................................... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Num ber. Per cent, i ..... Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school............... ............................................... Other reasons.................................................................... Child wished to work............................................. Per cent.1 Num ber. »477 — Num ber. 6 months or over. Per cen t.1 4 84 45 20 3 3 13 34 B o y s........................................................... . Per cent.1 3 months under 6 months. Num ber. 33 2 209 101 45 12 10 »41 82 N ot reported..................................................................... .. 1 month under 3 months. Per cent, i 143 164 76 46 30 Other reasons....................................................... ........... Child wished to work............................................ 1 week under 1 month. Total. Children with inter-# vals entirely during vaca tion. Num ber. 333 2 408 166 100 66 Economic reasons.................................................................... A ll other reasons...................................................................... Discontent with school................................................. Disliked school or teacher.................................... Slow progress or nonpromotion......................... Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go One week or more. 42.9 40.2 45.8 46.0 45.5 ■ 91 149 48 29 19 11.0 78 16.4 38 26.1 29.4 22.9 21.9 31 42 11 6 5 18.8 16.0 10.1 9.4 12 21 12 6 6 7.3 8.0 11.0 9.4 35.8 31.5 31 15 9 1 22.6 20.5 9 6 1 1 6.6 8.2 132~ 27.7 43 77 25 14 11 222~ 46.5 165 »262 109 64 45 79 122 60 35 25 47.9 46.6 55.0 54.7 16 » 137 . 73 29 8 2 225 1 61 35 14 3 2 7 3 49 23 11 5 16.8 17.2 13.9 .13.0 15.2 2 21 12 4 3 1 1 7 22.0 41.5 44.5 47.9 56 70 23 13 10 1 46 24 13 1 2 6 9 14 87 38 18 9 7 15 18 40.2 44.6 27.3 36.5 28.9 29.0 28.8 41.6 37.6 ÍÓ 1............... 1 6 22.0 23.8 .| i 10.0 11.9 8.5 1 1 2 5 2 2.4 ¡7 0 " 10 2.1 ................ 4 2 3 8 2 2 3.1 1.8 3.1 2 4 2 .9 6 12 30 1.3 6 2.3 1 5 2 3.6 2.7 1 1 2 2 Í 36.6 122 25.6 43 62 24 15 9 26.1 23.7 22.0 23.4 12 26 15 4 19.0 20.5 — T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTON . A ll chil dren. 17 21 42.0 12 24.0 1 5 10.0 5 10.0 2 4 .0 346 119 34.4 126 36.4 57 16.5 39 11.3 18 5.2 12 3.5 101 Economic reasons.................................................................. . A ll other reasons.......................................... .......................... Discontent with school............................................... Disliked school or teacher...................... ............ Slow progress or nonpromotion....................... Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school................... t ............. , ............i .......... Other reasons........ .......................................................... Child wished to work........................................... Parent wished child to w o r k ........................... Illness of child....................................................... . Illness in fam ily..................................................... Other reasons........................................................... N ot reported............................................................................ 168 146 57 36 21 64 42 16 11 5 38.1 28.8 28.1 48 72 23 15 8 28.6 49.3 40.4 25 28 12 7 5 14.9 19.2 21.1 18 19 5 3 2 10.7 13.0 8.8 1 17 5 4 1 .6 11.6 8.8 4 8 1 1 2.4 5.5 1.8 56 32 18 10 8 17 72 28 16 4 8 16 32 3 23 10 6 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 1 6 13 31.9 11 38 15 7 4 7 5 6 52.8 1 15 9 4 2 2 12 6 3 2 1 4 2 20.8 16.7 7 5 2 3 6.9 1 6 8.3 2 2 2 2 Including one boy for whom amount of schooltime lost was not reported. 3 11 3 3 5 13 33.3 21.9 31.6 15.3 T E R M IN A T IO N 50 Girls................................................................................ . N ot reported. OF SCH OO L L IF E . 117 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 118 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . A smaller proportion of the children who gave economic reasons than of those who gave other reasons for leaving school— 27.3 per cent as compared with 36.5 per cent— lost as much as a week of school time between leaving school and going to work. Only 1.5 per cent of those who gave economic reasons, moreover, as compared with 9.5 per cent of those who gave other reasons, lost as much as three months or more. Table 44 shows that this difference, though existing among the boys to a slight extent, was mainly among the girls; for nearly half, 49.3 per cent, of the girls who gave other than economic reasons for leaving school lost a week or more of school time, and 30.1 per cent of them lost a month or more. It might be thought that this difference would be accounted for by the loss of schooltime occurring among children who were leaving because of discontent with school. Yet only a slightly larger proportion of these children than of those who were leaving because of economic necessity, 28.9 per cent as compared with 27.3 per cent, actually lost one week or more. The difference, indeed, is to be accounted for by the large proportion of children who gave reasons not directly connected with school. For example, of the children who stated that they wished to work, over one-third, 37.6 per cent, lost a week or more of schooltime, and this illness or of illness in the family. GRADE COMPLETED. Because of the differences already discussed in age at going to w ork 48 and also because of differences which will be discussed later between vacation and regular workers,49 the three groups of children show considerable differences in the grades attained in school. About three-fourths, 75.8 per cent, of all the children who took out certificates in the four cities, according to Table 45, had completed only elementary grades in regular schools, and 19.5 per cent had completed one or more years in a high school; the others had come from voca tional, disciplinary, or other special schools. Of the children for whom continuation-school records were used, on the other hand, over four-fifths, 82.1 per cent, came from elementary grades and only 13.7 per cent from high schools. As the children who were inter viewed were, on an average, even younger than those for whom con tinuation-school records were used, a still larger proportion of them, 90.9 per cent, came from elementary grades and a smaller proportion, ^ only 7.9 per cent, from high schools. In each group a larger pro portion of the girls than of the boys came from elementary grades. « See p. 83. The certificate series of tables includes in addition to children who became regular workers children who worked only during vacation or out of school hours before their sixteenth birthdays. These latter children, according to Table 77, p. 164, were from higher grades, on an average, than were the children leaving school for work, who constituted the continuation school and schedule groups. « See p. 153. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 119 T E K M IN A T IO H OF SCHOOL, LIFE, All the children included in the study were, of course, over 14 years of age, and about half of those included in the continuation-school and certificate groups of children were over 15 when they took out their first certificates. Yet little more than half, 52.4 per cent, of the children who took out certificates in the four cities combined had completed the eighth or a higher grade in a regular school. The corresponding percentage for the continuation-school group was 49.6, and that for the interviewed children was 45.9. T a b l e 45.— Grade completed, by sex; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children issued certificates. Grade completed or kind of school last attended, and sex. Boston. A ll cities. N um ber. Children in Bos Children inter ton continua viewed (Boston).' tion school. Per N um cent ber. distribution. Per cent distribution. N um ber. Per cent distribution. N um ber. Per cent distribution. A ll children................ 5,692 100.0 4,401 100.0 3,399 100.0 823 100.0 Elementary grades............... , Fourth grade.................. Fifth grade...................... ? Sixth grade..................... Seventh grade................ Eighth grade.................. Prevocational................ Special............................... High school grades.............. First year........................ Second year..................... Third and fourth year. Vocational schools................ Disciplinary schools............ Other schools......................... N ot reported.......................... 4,312 233 440 851 838 1,873 50 27 1,111 736 306 69 179 20 41 29 75.8 4.1 7.7 15.0 14.7 32.9 .9 .5 19.5 12.9 5.4 1.2 3.1 .4 .7 .5 3,322 166 330 648 621 1,481 50 26 899 595 246 58 133 12 25 10 75.5 3.8 7.5 14.7 14.1 33.7 1.1 .6 20-4 13.5 5.6 1.3 3.0 .3 .6 .2 2,790 148 291 566 504 1,219 41 21 467 364 97 6 104 11 21 6 82.1 4.4 8.6 16.7 14.8 35.9 1.2 .6 13.7 10.7 2.9 .2 3.1 .3 .6 .2 2 748 36 91 160 147 313 90.9 4.4 11.1 19.4 17.9 38.0 65 61 4 7.9 7.4 .5 10 1.2 Boys........................ .......... 3,419 100.0 2,633 100.0 2,026 100.0 477 100.0 Elementary grades............... Fourth grade.................. Fifth grade...................... Sixth grade..................... Seventh grade................ Eighth grade.................. Prevocational................ Special.............................. High school grades.............. Vocational schools............... Disciplinary schools............ Other schools......................... N ot reported....................... 2,567 119 259 514 521 1,098 45 11 732 52 19 27 22 75.1 3.5 7.6 15.0 15.2 32.1 1.3 .3 21.4 1.5 .6 .8 .6 1,955 86 193 380 386 855 45 10 603 36 12 18 9 74.2 3.3 7.3 14.4 14.7 32.5 1.7 .4 22.9 1.4 .5 .7 .3 1,637 78 171 331 309 700 40 8 331 26 ii 16 5 80.8 3.8 8.4 16.3 15.3 34.6 2.0 .4 16.3 1.3 .5 .8 .2 425 15 53 91 84 182 89.1 3.1 11.1 19.1 17.6 38.2 45 9.4 „ 7 1.5 Girls.................................. 2,273 100.0 1,768 100.0 1,373 .100.0 346 100.0 1,745 114 181 337 317 775 5 16 379 127 1 14 7 76.8 5.0 8.0 14.8 13.9 34.1 .2 .7 16.7 5.6 1,367 80 137 268 235 626 5 16 296 97 77.3 4.5 7.7 15.2 13.3 35.4 .3 .9 16.7 5.5 1,153 70 120 235 195 519 1 13 136 78 84.0 5.1 8.7 17.1 14.2 37.8 .1 .9 9.9 5.7 3 323 21 38 69 63 131 93.4 6.1 11.0 19.9 18.2 37.9 20 5.8 .6 .3 ’7 1 .4 5 1 .4 .1 3 .9 Elementary grades............... Fourth grade.................. Fifth grade...................... Sixth grade..................... Seventh grade................ . Eighth grade.................. Prevocational................ Special............................... igh school grades.............. . -Vocational schools................. Disciplinary schools.............. Other schools........................... N ot reported............................ 1 Prevocational, special, vocational, disciplinary, and other schools are not separately entered for the children interviewed. * Including one girl under the fourth grade. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 120 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . Of all the children taking out certificates in the four cities combined^ including vacation as well as regular workers, according to Table 45, nearly 1 in 20, 4.1 per cent, had barely attained the educational re quirement for an employment certificate, completion of the fourth grade. Of the foreign-born children, however, one in eight, or 12.5 per cent, and of the children bom in Italy about 1 in 5, or 21.4 per cent, had not completed any grades higher than the fourth. More over, less than 1 in 3, 33.1 per cent, of the foreign-born children and only 15.7 per cent of the Italian children had completed the eighth or a higher grade. On the other hand over two-fifths, 44.2 per cent, of the Russian children had completed the eighth or a higher grade, a proportion comparing not unfavorably with that of the native children which was over one-half, 56.7 per cent. The proportion of Russian children who had completed the eighth or a higher grade, was higher, indeed, than that of the children born in 'England, Scotland, Wales, or British North America— all English-speaking coun tries—which was only about two-fifths, 40.1 per cent. Moreover, 11.5 per cent of the Russian children, as compared with only 1.5 per cent of the Italian children, had completed one or more high school grades. Of the native children, however, about 1 in 5, 21.8 per cent, had completed a year’s work in high school. T a b l e 46.— Grade completed, by nativity and nationality o f child; children issued certifi cates in fo u r cities. Foreign-horn children. Country of birth. Native children. England, Scotland, W ales or British North America. Total. Russia. Cfrade completed or school last attended. Italy. Other countries. Per Per Per Per Per Per cent N u m cent N u m cent N u m cent N u m cent N u m cent Num dis dis dis dis dis dis ber ber. ber. ber ber. ber tribu tribu tribu tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion A ll children................ 4.646 100.0 Elementary grades----- ------- 3.415 102 Fourth grade.................. 286 Fifth grade— ............... 645 Sixth grade..................... 703 Seventh grade................ Eighth grade.................. 1.623 45 Pre vocational. . ............ 11 Special........ ...................... High school grades.............. 1,015 670 First year........................ 278 Second year.................... 67 Third and fourth years 149 Vocationalschools................ 20 Disciplinary schools............ Other schools and hot re 47 ported ....... , ......................... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 100.0 349 100.0 323 100.0 207 100.0 100.0 84.8 11.7 11.2 18.3 10.0 32.7 14.5 10.1 3 .9 .5 2.4 1.7 2.0 .9 3 .4 3.6 T E R M IN A T IO N able 121 OF SC H O O L L IF E . 47.— Grade completed, by length o f residence in United States; foreign-barn children in B oston continuation school. Foreign-bom children in continuation school. Living in United States specified number of years. Total. Under 5 years. Grade completed or kind of school last attended. 5 years but under 10. 10 years and over. N ot reported. Per Per Per Per Per N um cent N um cent N um cent N um cent N um cent distri distri distri distri distri ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. bu bu bu bu bu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. A ll children. Elementary grades Fourth grade.. Fifth grade____ Sixth grade___ Seventh grade. Eighth grade... Prevocational.. Special................ High school grades. First year.......... Second year___ V ocationa 1schools. Other schools........... Not reported............ 637 100.0 153 100.0 98.0 34.0 27.5 17.6 7.8 5.9 1.3 3.9 224 100.0 203 100.0 57 100.0 93.0 8.8 12.3 28.1 8.8 33.3 Table 47 shows that, as would be expected, a much larger propor tion of the foreign-born children who had been in the United States less than 5 years than of those who had been here longer had barely managed to meet the educational requirements of the certificate law. According to this table, which relates only to the continuationschool group of regular workers, over one-third, 34 per cent, of the foreign-born children who had been in the United States less than 5 years had completed only the fourth grade, and none of them had finished a year’s high-school work. Of the foreign-bom children who had been in the United States 5 years but under 10 only 8.5 per cent, and of those who had been here 10 years or more only 3.4 per cent had failed to advance beyond the fourth grade. The latter percentage compares favorably with that for native children, which was 2.2. Furthermore, almost as large a proportion of the foreign-born children who had been in this country 10 years or more, 53.2 per cent, as of the native children, 56.7 per cent, had completed the eighth or a higher grade, and 14.3 per cent of them had finished at least one year’s work in high school. ^ When the nativity of the father as well as that of the child is considered, as in Table 48 for the interviewed children, it is found -at, although little more than one-fourth, 27.7 per cent, of the foreign-born children and less than one-half, 48.5 per cent, of the native children of foreign-born fathers had completed the eighth grade or one or more years of high-school work, over one-half, 54.8 4 94 7 0°— 22------ 9 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 122 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, per cent, of the native children of native fathers had finished th. eighth or a higher grade. Of the native girls whose fathers were also native, three-fifths, 58.1 per cent, had completed the eighth or a higher grade. It is somewhat surprising to find, however, that a slightly larger proportion of native children of foreign-born fathers than of native children of native fathers, 10.1 per cent as compared with 9 per cent, had completed the first or second year of the high school course. T a b l e 48.— Grade completed, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. Fathers foreign born. B oth fathers and children native. Total. Grade completed and sex of child. N um - Children native. Children foreign born. Per cent distributton. N um ber. Per cent distributton. N um ber. Per cent distributton. N um ber. Per cent distributton. B oth sexes...................... 823 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 166 100.0 Under seventh grade............. Under fourth grade......... Fourth grade.................... Fifth grade........................ Sixth grade........................ Seventh and eighth grades.. Seventh grade.................. Eighth grade.................... H igh school grades.............. : First year........... .............. Second y e a r ..................... Grade not reported1.............. 288 35.0 .1 4.4 11.1 19.4 55.9 17.9 38.0 7 .9 7.4 52 25.9 147 34.4 4 18 30 130 38 92 18 16 11 41 95 237 73 164 43 41 2 2.6 9.6 22.2 55.5 17.1 38.4 10.1 9.6 .5 47.6 .6 12.0 16.9 18.1 45.8 19.3 26.5 1.2 1.2 10 1.2 1 2.0 9.0 14.9 64.7 18.9 45.8 9 .0 8.0 1 0 .5 79 1 20 28 30 76 32 44 2 2 9 5.4 B o y s . . . ----- ------ i ......... 477 100.0 127 100.0 252 100.0 76 100.0 Under seventh grade............ Fourth grade.................. . Fifth grade...................... . Sixth grade........................ Seventh and eighth grades. Seventh grade................ . Eighth grade................... H igh school grades................. First year..................... Second year..................... Grade not reported............... 159 15 53 91 266 84 182 45 42 33.3 3 .1 11.1 19.1 55.8 17.6 38.2 9.4 8.8 34.1 3 .2 10.3 20.6 54.0 15.5 38.5 11.9 11.1 .8 31 4 10 17 38 16 22 1 1 40.8 5.3 13.2 22.4 50.0 21.1 28.9 1.3 1.3 1.5 26.0 1.6 10.2 14.2 63.8 20.5 43.3 9 .4 8.7 _8 .8 86 8 26 52 136 39 97 30 28 2 7 33 2 13 18 81 26 55 12 11 1 1 6 7.9 346 ~~100.0 74 100.0 175 100.0 90 100.0 129 1 21 38 69 194 63 131 20 19 1 3 19 25.7 61 34.9 2 5 12 49 12 37 6 5 1 2.7 6 .8 16.2 66.2 16.2 50.0 8.1 6 .8 1.4 3 15 43 101 ' 34 67 13 13 1.7 8.6 24.6 57.7 19.4 38.3 7.4 7 .4 48 1 16 18 13 38 16 22 1 1 53. 3 1.1 17.8 20.0 l£ 4 42.2 17.8 24,4 1.1 1.1 3 3.3 G ir ls ............................. Under seventh grade........... Under fourth grade____ Fourth grade.................. Fifth grade...................... Sixth grade...................... Seventh and eighth grades. Seventh grade................ Eighth grade................... H igh school grades................ First year......................... Second year..................... Grade not reported............... ll 36 91 160 460 147 313 65 61 37.3 .3 6.1 11.0 19.9 56.1 18.2 37.9 5.8 5 .5 .3 .9 Na tivity of thers not re- 22 About one-third, 34.4 per cent, of all the native children of foreignborn fathers and nearly half, 47.6 per cent, of the foreign-born children had not-completed grades higher than the sixth. Y et of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N OF SC H O O L L IF E . 123 e native children of native fathers only about one-fourth, 25.9 per cent, had failed to advance beyond the sixth grade. Of the 823 children interviewed 36, or 4.4 per cent, had barely attained the educational requirement for an employment certifi cate— completion of the fourth grade. And one foreign-born girl, when interviewed, did not claim to have completed even this grade, although her continuation school record stated that she had done soOf the 36 children who had completed only the fourth grade 20 were foreign born, 11 were native but had foreign-born fathers, and only 4 were native children of native fathers; 50 15 of them were boys and 21 girls. Although it is often observed that a larger proportion of girls than of boys enter high school, in each of the three groups of working children the proportion of boys who had finished one or more years of high school work was higher than the proportion of girls.51 Of the children interviewed, however, a larger proportion of the boys than of the girls of each nativity group came from high school grades, while 37.3 per cent of the girls and only 33.3 per cent of the boys had failed to complete any grade higher than the sixth. This compara tively large proportion of girls from the sixth and lower grades occurred, however, mainly among the foreign-born girls, of whom ,“3.3 per cent, as compared with only 40.8 per cent of the foreignyborn boys, had completed only the sixth or a lower grade. This was probably due to the excessive number of Italian girls among the interviewed children.52 On the other hand, the proportion of girls who had completed the eighth or a higher grade was higher than that of boys among the native children of native fathers. The small difference between the proportions of girls and of boys who left school upon completion of the eighth grade compared with the much larger difference between the proportions who had com pleted a high-school grade, when interpreted in connection with the greater amounts of school time lost by girls than by boys between the date of leaving school and the date of going to work,53would seem to indicate that many of these girls considered their schooling fin ished when they had completed the eighth grade. Table 49 shows that girls from the higher grades more frequently had intervals of one week or more between their school and their working lives than did any other group of children. Over two-fifths, 43.8 per cent, of the girls from the seventh or eighth grades had such intervals as compared with only 28.2 per cent of the boys from the same grades and with only 27.9 per cent of the girls from the lower grades. Of the girls who had completed the seventh or eighth grades, moreover, )out 1 in 8, 12.4 per cent, as compared with only 4.9 per cent of the boys, lost three months or more of schooltime. Many of these girls may have held special home permits. 60 The nativity of the father of the remaining child was not reported. 61 See Table 45, p. 119. 6* Seep. 77. •* See Table 44, pp. 116-117. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 124 T a b l e 49.— A m ount o f schooltime lost, by grade completed and sex; children interviewed. Children who' lost specified amount of schooltime ‘during interval between leaving school and Both sexes............. ....... ........................................... Under seventh grade........................... . — .................. Seventh and eighth grades.............................................. H igh school I and I I .......................... ............................. . N ot reported and other schools................................... B o y s........................................................................... 1 week under 1 m onth. Total. 1 m onth under 3 months under 6 months. 3 m onths. Per cent.2 Per cent.2 N um ber. Per cent.2 N um ber. Per cent.2 N um ber. Per cent.2 N um ber. Per cent.2 N um ber. Per cent.2 Num ber. 341 41.4 258 31.3 135 16.4 77 9.4 28 3 .4 18 2 .2 223 27.1 823 288” 460 65 10 163~ 149 23 6 56.6 32.4 35.4 75 160 21 2 26.0 34.8 32.3 42 78 13 2 14.6 17.0 20.0 25 45 7 8.7 9 .8 10.8 4 23 1 1.4 5.0 1.5 4 14 • 1.4 3 .0 49 151 21 2 17.0 32.8 32.3 46.5 132 27.7 78 16; 4 38 8.0 10 2.1 6 122 25.6 222 1.3 477 9 1 3.4 2 4 1.3 1.5 22 88 11 1 13.8 33.1 18 5.2 12 3 .5 101 29.2 27 63 10 1 20.9 32.5 159 266 45 7 97 103 18 4 61.0 38.7 39 75 16 2 24.5 28.2 27 40 9 2 17.0 15.0 10 22 6 6 .3 8.3 346 119 34.4 126 36.4 57 16.5 39 11.3 Girls................................... ....................................... Under seventh grade....................................................... Seventh and eighth grades........................ ................... H igh school I and I I ........................................................ N ot reported and other schools................................... 129 194 20 3 r~ https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 months or over. N um ber. Under seventh grade....................................................... Seventh and eighth grades............................................ High school I and I I ........................................................ N ot reported and other schools................................... 1 Includes one boy “ under the seventh grade * N ot shown where base is less than 50. Children with intervals en tirely during vacation. One week or more. 66 46 5 2 51.2 23.7 36 85 5 27.9 43.8 15 38 4 11.6 19.6 15 23 1 * 11.6 11.9 who went to work during school term; amount of schooltime lost not reported. 4 14 3.1 7.2 2 10 1.6 5 .2 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . • Grade completed and sex. None or less than one week AU (interval whoUy chil or partly dur dren.' ing school term.) t e r m in a t io n of sch oo l l if e 125 . - Both boys and girls, however, who had completed the seventh or eighth grades were more likely to lose schooltime between leaving school and going to- work than were children from the lower grades. Over one-third, 34.8 per cent, of the seventh and eighth grade gradu ates, as compared with little over one-fourth, 26 per cent, of the grad uates of lower grades, lost one week or more. A slightly smaller pro portion, 32.3 per cent, of the children who had completed one or more years of high-school work lost one week or more; but, on the other hand, about one-eighth of these children, 12.3 per cent, were out of school for one month or more before going to work. T a b l e 50.— Grade completed, by reason fo r leaving school, and sex; children interviewed. Children who had completed specified grade. Reasons for leaving school and sex. A ll 6th or lower. 7th or 8th. chil dren. High school I or II. N ot re ported. Num - Per Num - Per N um - Per N um - Per her. cent.1 her. cent.1 her. cent.1 her. cent.1 823 288 35.0 460 55.9 65 7.9 10 1.2 Economic reasons......................................................... “ other reasons, total............................................... Discontent with school, to ta l........................... Disliked school or teacher.......................... Slow progress or nonpromotion............... Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school............................................ Other reasons.......................................................... Child wished to work.................................. Parent wished child to work.................... Illness of child................................................. Illness in fam ily............................................. Other reasons........................................ .. — N ot reported....................................................... ............ 333 408 166 100 66 141 129 58 33 25 42.3 31.6 34.9 33.0 37.9 173 239 91 58 33 52.0 58.6 54.8 58.0 50.0 13 36 17 9 8 3.9 8.8 10.2 9.0 12.1 6 4 1.8 1.0 33 209 101 45 12 10 41 82 71 35 17 6 4 9 18 34.0 34.7 56.0 53.5 1 18 10 4 8.6 9.9 1 3 2 1.4 2.0 22.0 31 117 54 24 6 6 27 48 B o y s ...................................................................... 477 159 33.3 Economic reasons............................... ........................ A ll other reasons, total............................................... Discontent with school, total........................... Disliked school or teacher.................... .. Slow progress or nonpromotion............... Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school.,............................................ Other reasons.......................................................... Child wished to work.................................. Parent wished child to work........ ........... Illness of child................................................ Illness in fam ily............................................ Other reasons.......................... ................. .... N ot reported........................................... ................. 165 262 109 64 45 67 81 32 19 13 40.6 30.9 29.4 29.7 49 25 12 4 35.8 34.2 Both sexes....................................................— Girls............... ............................... ................... Economic reasons......................................................... A ll other reasons, total............................................... Discontent with school, total.......................... Disliked school or teacher.......................... Slow progress or nonpromotion.............. Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high school........ ...................................... Other reasons.................................... ..................... Child wished to work.................................. Parent wished child to work.................. . Illness of child.............................................. . Illness in fam ily.......................................... . Other reasons.................. '............................ Not reported........................... .............- ............. ......... • * Not shown where base is less than 5 0 ., https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 16 137 73 29 $ 2 25 50 1 58.5 4 16 19.5 266 55.8 45 9.4 7 1.5 84 152 65 40 25 50.9 58.0 59.6 62.5 11 25 12 5 7 6.7 9.5 11.0 7.8 3 4 1.8 1.5 52.6 53.4 13 7 3 9.5 9 .6 1 3 2 2.2 2.7 15 72 39 14 4 -1 6 11 22.0 15 30 60.0 3 9 18.0 346 129 37.3 194 56.1 20 5.8 3 .9 168 146 57 36 21 74 48 26 14 12 44.0 32.9 45.6 89 87 26 18 8 53.0 59.6 45.6 2 11 5 4 1 1.2 7.5 8.8 3 1.8 22 10 5 2 2 3 7 30.6 17 72 28 16 4 g 16 32 . 16 45 15 10 2 6 12 18 62.5 * 1 5 3 1 1 7 6 .9 126 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . This loss of school time between leaving school and going to wor among children from the higher grades was undoubtedly due primaril to difficulty in enforcing attendance of eighth-grade graduates at high schools. The compulsory school-attendance law made no distinc tion between advanced and retarded children. All between 14 and 16 who were not at work, or who had not secured special home permits, were supposed to be in school— in high school if they had completed the eighth grade. But the break between the elementary and the high school decidedly increases the difficulties in enforcing the law, and a more strict enforcement for children from the lower grades is reflected in the fact that considerably more than half, 56.6 per cent, of those who had not completed any grade higher than the sixth, as compared with less than a third, 32.4 per cent, of those who had com pleted the seventh or eighth grades, had no interval, or one of less than a week, between leaving school and going to work. Of the children who gave economic reasons for leaving school, as appears in Table 50, an even larger proportion than of those who stated that they left because of slow progress or nonpromotion, 42.3 per cent, as compared with 37.9 per cent, had completed only the sixth or a lower grade. This was a considerably larger proportion than of those who gave other than economic reasons, which was onl 31.6 per cent. Of the girls who left school because of economic ne cessity an even larger proportion than of the boys came from these lower grades. On the other hand, about 1 in 8 of the children who left school because of slow progress or nonpromotion had completed at least one year’s high-school work. Of the children who left becau se of discontent with their school, including dislike of the school or the teacher and slow progress or nonpromotioii, 11 per cent of the boys and 8.8 per cent of the girls came from high school. This was the most common reason for leaving school given by high-school pupils. RETARDATION. According to the commonly accepted standard, children of 14 should have completed the eighth grade. The fact, therefore, that of the children included in this study, all of whom were over 14, and a large proportion in the certificate and continuation-school groups over 15, when they took out their first employment certificates, only about half had completed the grammar-school course shows that a large number of them must have been retarded. This standard of retardation ,is doubtless, however, too high to apply to the average school child or to the working children include https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L L IF E . 127 iji this study. Accordingly a considerably less stringent test was applied.54 A child who left school when he was 14 years of age, for example, was not considered retarded for the purposes of this study unless he had failed to complete a grade higher than the sixth. I f he had completed either the seventh or the eighth grade his school standing was called normal. But if he had completed only the fifth or the sixth grade he was considered to be retarded one or two years, and if he had completed only the fourth grade he was classified as retarded three years or more. On the other hand, completion of a high-school grade was considered higher standing than normal for his age. In the same way a child who left school when he was 15 was said to have completed a normal grade if he had finished the eighth grade or the first year of high-school work, and one who left school when he was 13 if he had completed the sixth or the seventh grade. Table 51 shows that, according to this standard, over three-tenths, 31.5 per cent, of the children who took out certificates in Boston for work during school hours55 were retarded. The corresponding percentages for the children whose continuation-school records were used and for those who were interviewed were 31.4 and 32.4, respec tiv e ly . In spite of the fact that the proportions of children for whom only the school and not the grade was given were much higher in the certificate and continuation-school groups than in the schedule group the latter showed the smallest percentage, 4.1 per cent, as compared with 6 per cent for both the other groups, of children who were three or more grades below normal for their ages. When children from higher grades than normal are considered, however, it is found that this difference in the proportion of cases in which grade was not reported appears to cause discrepancies between the- figures, for in the certificate and continuation-school groups about 1 in 10, 9.4 per cent and 9.6 per cent, respectively, while in the schedule group about 1 in 6, 16.5 per cent, were reported as advanced in their school work. In this case the proportion among the children interviewed, 16.5 per cent, is doubtless a better measure than are the proportions for either of the other groups of the number of children from higher grades than normal for their ages. In each group a smaller proporM For a diagram showing graphically the method of classification see appendix, p. 362. M Seesection on W ork Before Leaving School, pp. 148 to 170. Thechildren who worked only during vaca tion, as will he seen later ( Table 79, p. 169), were m uch less frequently retarded than were the regular workers. The figures for all the children who took out certificates in the four cities would not, therefore, be comparable with those for the children in either the continuation school or the schedule groups, both of which included only children who became regular workers before their sixteenth birthdays. The division into vacation and regular workers could not be made for the children who took out certificates in Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea, because the records did not show when positions were terminated. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 128 th e W o r k in g c h il d r e n oe boston . tion of girls than of boys were advanced in their school work and a larger proportion were retarded. About half the children in each group were neither retarded nor advanced but had just completed grades normal for their ages. The percentages of these normal children were 48.1 in the certificate group, 47.7 in the continuation-school group, and 49.7 in the schedule group. 51.— Retardation, by sex; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school and with children issued certificates in B oston fo r work during school hours. T able Children issued certificates in Boston for work during school hours. B oth sexes. Boys. Retardation. Girls. N um ber. Per cent distri bution, N um ber. Per cent distri bution, N um ber. Per cent distri bution. A ll ch ildren.......................... ............................... 3,544 100.0 2,114 100.0 1,430 100.0 H aving completed— A higher grade than normal............................... A normal g r a d e ...................................................... A lower grade than normal............................ .*.. One or two grades lower than normal___ Three or more grades lower than normal N ot reported ......................................................... 334 1,706 1,117 905 212 387 Children in Boston continuation school. B oth sexes. Boys. 208 967 663 548 115 276 Girls. Children interviewed (Boston). B oth sexes. Boys. Girls. Retardation. Per Per Per Per Per Per cent cent N um N um Num cent N um cent Num cent N um cent distri distri distri distri distri distri ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. bu bu bu bu bu bu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. A ll children................... 3,399 100.0 2,026 100.0 1,373 100.0 Having completed— A higher grade than normal............................. 325 , A normal grade............... 1,622 A lower grade than nor m a l.................................. 1,066 One or tw o grades lower than normal. 861 T h r e e or m o re grades lower than normal.................... 205 N o t reported1.................. 386 9.6 47.7 202 917 10.0 45.3 123 705 9.0 51.3 823 100.0 477 100.0 346 100.0 136 409 82 238 17.2 49.9 54 171 15.6 49.4 16.5 49.7 31.4 632 31.2 434 31.6 267 32.4 149 31.2 118 34.1 25.3 522 25.8 339 24.7 233 28.3 135 28.3 98 28.3 6.0 11.4 110 275 5.4 13.6 95 111 6.9 8.1 34 11 4.1 1.3 14 8 2.9 1.7 20 3 5.8 .9 * ieporwju, means uiac m e cnuaren came from disciplinary, prevocational, and other sue schools and that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. A larger proportion of the foreign-born than of the native children were retarded. Of the native children for whom continuationschool records were used, according to Table 52, a little over one- https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Termination of school life . 129 fourth, 27.5 per cent, had failed to attain a normal grade. But of the foreign-born children nearly one-half, 48.2 per cent, were re tarded, and 17.9 per cent of them were three or more grades below normal. The proportion of Italian children, 27.7 per cent, who were three or more grades below normal was somewhat larger than the proportion of native children who were retarded even a single grade. Nearly two-thirds, 63.1 per cent, of the Italian children, indeed, were at least one grade below normal. Yet only about two-fifths, 39.7 per cent, of the Russian children, and not much more than one-third, 35.7 per cent, of all the children from north and west Europe were retarded. A smaller proportion of the Italian girls were retarded than of the Italian boys, 55.6 per cent as compared with 70.4 per cent. That in many cases the retardation among foreign-born children may have been due, in part, merely to breaks in the school life occa sioned by changes in residence is suggested by the fact that even of the native children who were not born in Boston or the adjoining cities of Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea, a larger proportion, 30.4 per cent, were retarded than of the native children born in one of those cities, 27 per cent. That differences in language or in oppor tun ities for education, combined with such changes of residence, were y a t least in large part responsible for the greater amount of retarda tion among foreign-born children is indicated by the facts shown in Table 53. Here it is seen that over three-fourths, 78.4 per cent, of the children who had been in the United States less than 5 years, not quite half, 49.6 per cent, of those who had been here 5 but under 10 years, and not much more than one-fourth, 28.6 per cent, of those who had been here 10 years or more, were retarded. In other words among the foreign-born children who had been in the United States long enough to have begun their school lives here, the proportion re tarded was but little higher than among the native children. The influence of language differences appears also, as will be shown later,57 in a larger proportion of retarded children among those whose fathers were of non-English-speaking nationalities. Nevertheless, among the native children included in the continu ation-school group are a large number whose fathers were foreign born, and it appears, according to Table 54, that among the inter viewed children a considerably larger proportion of the native children of foreign-born fathers than of the native children of native fathers, 31.9 per cent as compared with 22.9 per cent, were retarded, hit of the foreign-born children in this group 45.2 per cent were retarded, and 10.2 per cent, as compared with only 2.8 per cent of the native children of foreign-born fathers and 2 per cent of the children of native fathers, were three or more grades below normal. «» See Table 55. p . 133. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON, 130 T a b l e 52.— R eta rd ation , by place o f birth and sex; children in B o sto n con tin u a tion sch ool. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages - A lower grade than normal. Placé of birth and sex. A higher grade than normal. A ll chil dren. One or two grades lower than normal. A normal grade. Total. Three or more grades lower than normal. N ot re ported.1 Per N u m Per N u m Per N um Per N u m Per N um Per N um ber. cent.* ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent/ ber. cent.: ber. cent.1 3,399 325 9 .6 1,622 United States......... 2,761 Boston, Cam bridge, Som erville, Chel s e a .. . ............ 2,419 Elsewhere in 342 United States ■North and west Europe................ Ireland............ . Other............... South and east Europe................ . Ita ly ................. Russia............ O t h e r ............... Other countries— 295 10.7 1,389 B oth s exe s. . 47.7 s 1,066 31.4 »861 25.3 205 6.0 758 27.5 667 24.2 91 3.3 50.3 275 52.2 63.1 39.7 8.0 34 45.3 '4Ò.Ò 2,026 10.0 917 45.3 31.2 United States.......... 1,701 Boston, Cam bridge, Som erville, Chel sea................... Elsewhere in United States North and west Europe.................. Ireland.............. OJher................. South and east 227 Europe___ . . . . . . 125 Ita ly ............... Russia................ Other.................. Other countries— 185 10.9 811 47.7 27.6 1,373 123 9.0 United States......... 1,060 Boston, Cam bridge, Som erville, Chel 943 sea............... .. Elsewhere in 117 United States North and west Europe.................. Ireland............... Other................. South and east Europe...........— Ita ly ................... Russia................ Other................. Other countries___ 110 10.4 Girls............... 2.4 12.2 30.2 35.3 24.5 22.0 10.8 28.Ò Ì2.Ó 35.4 33.6 26.1 41.7 202 B o y s ............... 319 140 »522 25.8 24.3 8.4 13.7 27.7 15.2 55 5.4 275 1 3.6' 3.2 236 13.9 40.4 578 129 56.8 70.4 39.8 51.3 434 31.6 339 24.7 54.5 289 27.3 253 23.9 38.4 33.9 41.5 47.7 55.6 •39.6 22.5 28.8 14.3 34.4 41.6 25.5 28.6 18.4 41.8 26.2 29.0 23.6 36 6.9 8.1 3.4 7.8 21.5 26.6 16.0 i “ N ot reported ” means that the children came from disciplinary, prev ocational, and other special schools and that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. * N ot shown where base is less than 50. - * Includes one boy whose place of birth was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 131 T E R M IN A ’T lO H OF SC H O O L L IF E . ble 53 Retardation, by nativity, len gth of residencein UnitedStates, and sex; children m B oston continuation school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. N ativity, length of r e s i d e n c e in United States, and sex. A ll chil dren. A higher grade than normal. N um ber. B oth s e x e s.. «3,399 A normal grade. Total. Per N um cent.5 ber. One or two grades lower than normal. Per N um - Per N um cent.5 ber. cent.5 ber. Three or more grades lower than normal. Per N um cent. ber. N ot re ported.1 cent.5 ber. Icent.2 325 9.6 1,622 47.7 «1,066 31.4 «861 25.3 205 6 .0 386 11.4 2,761 637 295 30 10.7 1,389 4 .7 233 50.3 36.6 758 307 27.5 48.2 667 193 24.2 30.3 91 114 3.3 17.9 319 67 11.6 10.5 153 224 6 2.7 13 87 8.5 38.8 120 111 78.4 49.6 54 80 35.3 35.7 66 31 43.1 13.8 20 20 13.1 8.9 203 21 10.3 111 54.7 58 28.6 46 22.7 12 5.9 13 6.4 57 3 5.3 22 38.6 18 31.6 13 22.8 5 8.8 14 24.6 »2,026 202 10.0 917 45.3 «632 31.2 «522 25.8 110 5.4 275 13.6 N ative............ 1,701 Foreign born 324 -Years in United States: Under 5 . . 76 5 under 10. 123 10 years or over___ 103 N ot re ported.. 22 185 17 10.9 5.2 811 106 47.7 32.7 469 162 27.6 50.0 414 107 24.3 33.0 55 55 3.2 17.0 236 39 13. 9 12.0 3 2.4 7 43 9.2 35.0 59 65 77.6 52.8 29 49 38.2 39.8 30 16 39.5 13.0 10 12 13.2 9.8 11 10.7 51 49.5 32 31.1 25 24.3 7 6.8 9 8.7 N ative..................... i Foreign born.......... Years in Unitec States: Under 5 . . . 5 under 10.. 10 years or over........ N o t re ported. . . B o y s. . Girls............. . 3 5 6 4 2 8 1,373 123 9 .0 705 51.3 434 31.6 339 24.7 95 6 .9 111 8.1 N ativ e..................... . 1,060 Foreign born........... 313 Years in United States: Under 5 . . . 77 5 under 10.. 101 10 years or over........ 100 N ot re ported. . . 35 110 13 10.4 4.2 578 127 54.5 40.6 289 145 27.3 46.3 253 86 23.9 27.5 36 59 3.4 18.8 83 28 7.8 8.9 3 3 .0 6 44 7.8 43.6 61 46 79.2 45.5 25 31 32.5 30.7 36 15 46.8 14.9 10 8 13.0 7.9 10 10.0 60 60.0 26 26.0 21 21.0 5 5.0 4 4.0 1 . 1 6 17 12 9 “ S r" , « « “ 0 1rom aiscipnnary, prevocational, and other special schools r®C0r^ s only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. 2 Not shown where base is less than 50. 6 8 Including one boy for whom nativity was not reported. *Tv. • A somewhat larger proportion of the native sons of native fathers than of the native daughters of native fathers, 23.6 per cent as com pared with 21.6 per cent, were retarded. Among the native children of foreign-born fathers little difference appears between the sexes; but among the foreign-born children who were interviewed 52.2 per t of the girls as compared with only 36.8 per cent of the boys were .tarded. The high percentage of retardation among the foreignborn children is evidently due primarily to the large amount of retar dation among the girls of that group, nearly one-sixth, 15.6 per cent, of whom were three or more grades below normal. On the other hand, a larger proportion of the native children of foreign-born than https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 132 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . of native fathers, 19.2 per cent as compared with 16.9 per cent, h completed higher grades than normal for their ages. T a b l e 54 — Retardation, by nativity o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. N ativity of father and nativity and sex of child. A higher A ll grade than chil normal. dren. A normal grade. Total. Three or O n e or two grades lower more grades lower than than, normal. normal. Not reported. Per Num - Per Num - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 B oth sexes-----B oth fathers and children native . . . Fathers foreign b o m . Children native.. Children foreign b o m .................. N ativity of fathers not r e p o r t e d ; B o y s ................... B oth fathers and children native— Fathers f oreign bom . Children n a tive.. Children foreign born................... N ativity of fathers not r e p o r t e d ; children native— Girls................... B oth fathers and children n a tiv e .. . Fathers foreign bom . Children native Children foreign b o m ___ N ativity of fathers not r e p o r t e d ; children native. . . 823 136 16.5 409 49.7 267 32.4 233 28.3 34 4.1 11 201 593 427 34 96 82 16.9 16.2 19.2 120 276 209 59.7 46.5 48.9 46 211 136 22.9 35.6 31.9 42 182 124 20.9 30.7 29.0 4 29 12 2 .0 4.9 2 .8 1 10 166 14 8.4 67 40.4 75 45.2 58 34.9 17 10.2 10 6 .0 29 6 1Ï 2 .9 ' 8 L7 .5 1.7 ...... 1 9 10 13 1.3 477 82~ 17.2 238 49.9 149 31.2 135 28.3 127 328 252 18 59 54 14.2 18.0 21.4 78 153 117 61.4 46.6 46.4 30 109 81 23.6 33.2 32.1 28 98 73 22.0 29.9 29.0 2 11 8 1.6 3 .4 3.2 1 7 2.1* 76 5 6.6 36 47.4 28 36.8 25 32.9 3 3.9 7 9 .2 22 5 ........... 1 9 10 7 ........... 346 54 15.6 171 49.4 118 34.1 98 28.3 20 5.8 3 .9 74 265 175 16 37 28 21.6 14.0 16.0 42 123 92 56.8 46.4 52.6 16 102 55 21.6 38.5 31.4 14 84 51 18.9 31.7 29.1 2 18 4 2.7 6 .8 2 .3 3 1.1 90 9 10.0 31 3À 4 47 52.2 33 36.7 14 15.6 3 3 .3 6 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. The children of foreign-born fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities, as shown in Table 55, were much more frequently re tarded than were those of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities. Of the former 43 per cent and of the latter only 24.7 per cent had failed to attain a normal grade. As was seen to be the case among children who were themselves foreign born, the Italian group furnished the largest proportion of retarded children, while comparatively few such children were found in the Russian-Jewigh group. Over one-half, 51.3 per cent, of the children of Italisd^j fathers were retarded, and 10.2 per cent of them were three or mofe grades lower than normal. Only a little over one-third, 34.3 per cent, of the children of Russian-Jewish fathers were retarded and only 2.9 per cent of them were three or more grades below normal for their ages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 133 T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L LIFE , b l e 55.— Retardation, by nationality o f father, and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than rîormal. Nationality of father and sex of child. A higher A ll chil grade than normal. dren. A normal grade. Total. Three or One or two grades lower more grades lower than than, normal. normal. Not reported. Num - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per Num - Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 Both sexes........ 823 Children of native 201 fathers...................... Children of foreignhorn fathers........... 2 593 Of English-speak ing nationali 243 ties ...................... Irish................ 167 76 Others............ O f non-Englishspeaking na 349 tionalities... Italian___ 197 Russian-Jew ish................ 70 82 Other............ Children the nativ'ty of whose fathers 29 was not reported.. B o y s ........... . 477 Children of native 127 fathers.................. Children of foreign2 328 bom fathers. . . . O f English-speak ing nationali 152 ties ................ Irish.......... 101 O ther.___ 51 O f non-Fnglishspeaking na 175 tionalities... Italian___ 85 Russian-Jewish.............. 40 50 Other............ Children the nativ ity of whose fathers 22 was not reported.. Girls.................... Children o f native fathers...................... Children of foreignbom fathers........... O f English-speak ing nationali ties................ Irish.......... Other........ O f non-Englishspeaking na, tionalities... Italian___ Russian-Jewish.......... Other........ Children the nativ ity of whose fathers was not reported.. 346 409 49.7 16.9 120 59.7 46 22.9 42 20.9 4 2.0 1 .5 16.2 276 46.5 2 211 35.6 182 39.7 2 29 4.9 10 1.7 51 37 14 21.0 22,2 18.4 130 85 45 53.5 50.9 59.2 60 45 15 24.7 26.9 19.7 58 43 15 23.9 25.7 19.7 2 2 .8 1.2 2 .8 2 2.6 45 20 12.9 10.2 146 69 41.8 35.0 150 101 43.0 51.3 124 81 35.5 41.1 26 20 7.4 10.2 8 7 2.3 3.6 12 13 17.1 15.9 33 44 47.1 53.7 24 25 34.3 30.5 22 21 31.4 25.6 2 4 2.9 4.9 1 1.4 82 17.2 .238 49.9 149 31.2 135 28.3 14 2.9 8 1.7 136 16.5 34 96 6 267 32.4 233 10 13 34 28.3 4.1 11 1.3 1 9 18 14.2 78 61.4 30 23.6 28 22.0 2 1.6 1 .8 59 18.0 153 46.6 2 109 33.2 98 29.9 2 11 3.4 7' 2.1 36 26 10 23.7 25.7 19.6 80 50 30 52.6 49.5 58.8 34 25 9 22.4 24.8 17.6 32 23 9 21.1 22.8 17.6 2 2 1.3 2.0 23 5 13.1 5.9 73 30 41.7 35.3 74 46 42.3 54.1 66 42 37.7 49.4 8 4 4.6 4.7 9 9 18.0 20 23 46.0 10 18 36.0 9 15 30.0 1 3 6.0 49.4 118 34.1 98 2S.3 5 7 54 Is T iT 171 1.3 3.9 5 4 2.9 4.7 1 1 9 10 2 2 ’ 20 5.8 3 .9 74 16 21.6 42 56.8 16 21.6 14 18.9 2 2.7 265 37 14.0 123 46.4 102 38.5 84 31.7 18 6.8 3 1.1 91 56 25 15 11 4 16.5 16.7 50 35 15 54.9 53.0 26 20 6 28.6 30.3 26 20 6 28.6 30.3 174 112 22 15 12.6 13.4 73 39 42.0 34.8 76 55 43.7 49.1 58 39 33.3 34.8 18 16 10.3 14.3 3 3 1.7 2.7 30 32 3 4 13 21 7 1 6 14 7 1 1 13 6 M 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 2 Including one boy the nationality of whose father was not specified, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis I <i 1 134 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . Among the children interviewed, as among the foreign-bo children included in the continuation-school group, a larger propor tion of Italian boys than of Italian girls— 54.1 per cent as compared with 49.1 per cent— were retarded. Of the children of Irish fathers, a smaller proportion of boys than of girls— 24.8 per cent as compared with 30.3 per cent—had failed to attain a normal grade. T a b l e 56.— Retardation, by age at talcing out first certificate, and sex; children in B oston continuation school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. A ll Age at taking out first chil certificate, and sex. dren. A higher grade than normal. A normal Total. Three or One or two grades lower more grades lower than than, normal. normal. Not reported.1 Num Per Num Per N um Per N um Per Num Per N um Per ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. A ll children.. . 3,399 325 9.6 1,622 1414* years.. 1,151 710 14$-15 years.. 1515$ years.. 732 806 15J-16 years. . B o y s .. 2,026 1414$ years. 14$-15 years.. 1515$ years.. 15$-16 years.. G ir ls.. 1414$ years.. 14$-15 years.. 1515$ years.. 15$-16 years.. 202 10.0 687 395 464 480 1,373 464 315 268 326 123 9 .0 47.7 1,066 31.4 861 25.3 420 370 390 442 36.5 52.1 53.3 54.8 402 184 226 254 34.9 25.9 30.9 31.5 346 152 168 195 30.1 21.4 23.0 24.2 917 45.3 632 31.2 522 25.8 246 185 239 247 35.8 46.8 51.5 51.5 239 93 143 157 34.8 23.5 30.8 32.7 203 83 108 128 29.5 705 51.3 434 31.6 339 24.7 174 185 151 195 37.5 58.7 56.3 59.8 35.1 28.9 31.0 29.8 11.4 205 16.6 13.0 110 5 .4 95 6.9 275 13.6 21.0 23.3 26.7 30.8 21.9 22.4 20.6 1 “ Not reported” means that the children came from disciplinary, prevoeational, vocational, and other special schools and that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. The continuation-school children who went to work soon after becoming 14— that is, between 14 and 14J years of age— were more frequently from higher grades than normal than were those who went to work at any other age. According to Table 56 nearly oneeighth, 12 per cent, of these children had completed higher grades than normal, as compared with only 9 per cent of the children who went to work when they were between 14^ and 15 years of age, and with even smaller proportions of those who went to work when over 15. The oldest age group, 15£ to 16 years, had the smallest propor tion of advanced children, only 7.8 per cent. On the other hand, th group of children who went to work before they were 14£ years age contained also a larger proportion of retarded children than any other group. More than one-third, 34.9 per cent, of them came from https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N ' OF SCH O O L L IF E . 135 .lower grades than normal for their ages, whereas only about onefourth, 25.9 per cent, of the children who went to work between 14J and 15, and less than one-third, 30.9 per cent and 31.5 per cent, re spectively, of those in the two older age groups came from such grades. The slightly larger proportion of retarded children among those who went to work when they were over 15 than among those who did so when between 14^ and 15 may indicate that some of the older chil dren had been prevented from going to work earlier by their failure to attain the educational standard for employment certificates. The supposition that this is the true explanation is confirmed by the fact that both groups of children who went to work when over 15 showed unusually high proportions of children who were three or more grades below normal for their ages. At any rate the group of children who went to work within six months after becoming 14 appears to have contained an unusually large proportion both of advanced and of retarded children, while the group of children who did not go to work until within six months before their sixteenth birthdays contained an abnormally small proportion of children from higher grades than normal. The retardation figures for the boys and for the girls of the different age groups differ only slightly. An even irger proportion of the boys who went to work when between 14£ and 15 years of age than of those who went to work earlier, 12.2 per cent as compared with 10.5 per cent, came from higher grades than normal for their ages, while of the girls who went to work when be tween 14^ and 15 years of age only 5.1 per cent, as compared with 14.2 per cent of those who went to work before they were 14J, were advanced in their school work. Apparently the girls who had com pleted higher grades than normal for their ages left school even more quickly after attaining the legal age to work than did the boys. Although the data concerning the death and the employment status of the father and mother were taken as of the date when the child went to work and may not have been of long enough standing to have had any effect on the child’s school work, Table 57 shows for the continuation-school group that, among the children both of whose parents were employed and also among those both of whose parents were not employed— neither a normal family status— unusu ally large proportions were retarded. Of the children in the former group— that is, whose mothers as well as fathers were employed— 45.3 per cent were retarded. In the latter group the proportion was somewhat less, 40 per cent. When the father was not employed and the mother employed, only 32.1 per cent of the children were retarded, but an unusually large proportion, 16.1 per cent, were three or more grades below normal. The death of the father or the fact that he was not living with his family seems to have had no https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 136 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . effect on the school standing of the child. But when the m other was dead or not living with the family exactly one-third were re tarded— a somewhat larger proportion than that for all the children for whom continuation-school records were used. T a b l e 57.— Retardation, by fa m ily status; children in B oston continuation school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages- A lower grade than normal. Fam ily status. A higher All grade than chil normal. dren. A normal grade. Total. One or two Three or grades lower more grades than, lower than normal. normal. Not reported.1 Num Per Num Per N um Per N um Per Num Per N um Per ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. Total.................. 3,399 Parents living to gether........................ 2,263 Both p a r e n t s employed.......... 139 Neither parent employed.......... 150 Father employed and mother not employed.......... 1,918 Father not em p l o y e d and m o t h e r em ployed................ 56 Father dead or not living with fam ily. 600 Mother dead or not living with fam ily. 150 Both parents dead or not living with fam ily........................ 96 Status of one or both parents not re 290 ported........................ 325 9.6 1,622 47.7 1,066 210 9.3 1,084 31.4 861 25.3 205 6.0 386 11.4 47.9 737 32.6 589 26.0 148 6.5 232 10.3 8 5 .8 53 38.1 63 45.3 53 38.1 10 7.2 15 10.8 8 5.3 69 46.0 60 40.0 41 27.3 19 12.7 13 8.7 191 10.0 930 48.5 596 31.1 486 25.3 110 ' 5 .7 201 10Æ 3 5.4 32 57.1 18 32.1 9 16.1 9 16.1 3 5.4 64 10.7 295 49.2 177 29.5 142 23.7 35 5 .8 64 10.7 14 9.3 69 46.0 50 33.3 43 28.7 7 4.7 17 11.3 4 4.2 53 55.2 31 32.3 26 27.1 5 5.2 8 8.3 33 11.4 121 41.7 71 24.5 61 21.0 10 3.4 65 22.4 1 “ Not reported” means that the children came from disciplinary, prevocational, vocational, and other special schools and that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. The occupation of the father, if employed, as well as the mere fact of his employment or unemployment, is a rough index to the eco nomic status of the family. Table 58 shows that among the children interviewed the largest proportion, 49.4 per cent, who were retarded was found in the group where the fathers were unemployed. The next largest proportion, 43.1 per cent, was found among the children whose fathers were merchants or peddlers, and the third largest, 35.6 per cent, among the children whose fathers were laborers. It has already been seen, however, that both the native and for eign-born children of foreign-born fathers were much more fre^ quently retarded than were the children of native fathers 58 anc also that foreign-born fathers of both native and foreign-born chilw See Table 55, p. 133. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 137 T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L L IF E . dren were much more frequently engaged in certain occupations than were native fathers.59 The differences shown in Table 58, therefore, might be due entirely to differences in nativity distribution of the fathers engaged in the different occupations. Table 59, however, compares with the actual number of retarded children in each occu pational group the number of retarded children who would be ex pected in that group if the rate of retardation prevailing in each nationality group prevailed also in each occupational group of that nationality. For many of the occupational groups the numbers are too small and the differences not large enough to be significant; but the influence of occupation seems to be shown in the groups of skilled or semiskilled mechanics, and factory operatives, in which the actual numbers of retarded children were very low, and also in the groups of merchants and peddlers and of unemployed where the proportions of retarded children were high. T able 58.— Retardation, by occupation o f father; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Occupation of father. A ll chil dren. A higher grade than normal. A n o rm a l grade. Total. One or two Three or grades lower more grades than. lower than normal. normal. Not reported. Num - Per Num - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per Num- Per ber. cent.“ ber. cent.“ ber. cent.“ ber. cent.“ ber. cent.“ ber. cent.“ Total................... 823 136 16.5 409 554 97 17.5 118 16 13.6 49.7 267 32.4 233 285 51.4 57 48.3 28.3 34 164 29.6 42 35.6 147 26.5 36 30.5 4.1 11 17 3.1 8 6 5.1 1.3 Father employed and living with Laborer (all inSkilled or sem is k i l l e d m e chanic................ Factory operaM e r c h a n t (ineluding ped dler) .................... Other proprietor. Clerical w orker.. Teamster,driver, expressm an.. . Other..................... Father not employed. Father not l i v i n g with fam ily.............. Father d e ad ".............. N ot reported............... 1.4 2 .5 118 17 14.4 72 61.0 28 23.7 26 22.0 2 1.7 .8 91 19 20.9 47 51.6 22 24.2 21 23.1 1 1.1 3.3 51 31 10 7 4 3 13.7 22 16 6 43.1 22 11 43.1 20 10 39.2 2 1 3 .9 52 83 81 12 19 6 23.1 22.9 7.4 26 39 35 50.0 47.0 43.2 14 25 40 26.9 30.1 49.4 14 20 30 26.9 24.1 37.0 5 10 6 .0 12.3 21 149 18 2 26 5 17.4 12 72 5 48.3 7 48 8 32.2 6 42 8 28.2 1 6 4 .0 “ N ot shown where baséis less than 50. 69 See Table 26, p. 93. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 10 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 3 2 .0 138 T T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N able OF BOSTON . 59.— Retardation, by occupation o f father with influence o f nationality eliminated; children interviewed. C h i l d r e n in lower grades than normal. Occupation of father. Com Actual. puted.1 T otal......... ........... ........................ Father living with fa m ily ................... Laborer (all industries)............... Skilled or semiskilled mechanic Factory operative.......................... Merchant (including peddler). . Other proprietor............................. Clerical worker................................ Teamster, driver, expressman.. O th e r ................................................ N ot em ployed................................. Father not living with fam ily........... Father dead............................................. N ot reported............................................ 267 267 207.7 40.2 37.2 31.5 17.6 10.7 2 .6 15.8 25.3 26.7 7.0 46.9 5.9 204 42 28 22 22 11 14 25 40 7 48 8 1 Calculated on the assumption that the proportion of retarded children for the different nationalities which prevailed in the whole group of children prevailed also for those nationalities in each occupation group. The difference between the expected number as thus calculated and the actual number is the measure of the influence of the occupational factor, with the influence of nationality eliminated. The tendency of retarded children to take their first positions during the school year was pronounced. Table 60 shows that of all the interviewed children who took their first positions during "a Rummer vacation only 19.2 per cent, but of those who went to work at some other time 37.4 per cent, were retarded. Moreover, of the children who took their first positions during a summer vacation only 1.3 per cent were three or more grades below normal, while of those who went to work at some other time 5.2 per cent were three or more grades below normal. This may be ascribed partly to the fact that a child who leaves school during the school year loses the chance to complete the grade last entered, but it undoubtedly indicates also a greater tendency on the part of retarded than on the part of other children to drop out of school at the first opportunity regardless of the completion of any unit of school work. This tendency was evident in each nationality group but particu larly among the children of foreign-born fathers of non-English speaking nationalities, notably the Italian group. Of the children of all foreign-bom fathers 21.4 per cent of those who went to work during a summer vacation were retarded as compared with 41.4 per cent of those who went to work at some other time. Of the children of foreign-bom fathers of non-English-speaking nationali ties 27.7 per cent of those who went to work during a summer vaca; tion and 48.6 per cent of those who went to work at some other tim. were retarded. For the children of Italian fathers the proportion https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N 139 OF SCH O O L LIFE , retarded among those who went to work during a summer vacation was 32 per cent but among those who went to work at some other time it was 57.8 per cent. T a b l e 60.— Retardation, by nationalityr o f father and time o f securing first regular p osition ; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lo w e r grade than normal. N a t i o n a l i t y of father; time of se curing first regular position. A higher All chil grade than normal. dren. A normal grade. Total. One or two Three or grades lower more grades than lower than normal. normal. Not reported. Num - Per N um - Per N um - Per Num - Per Num - Per Num ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 Total___ 823 136 16.5 409 49.7 267 32.4 233 28.3 34 4.1 11 1.3 Po s i t i on secured d u r in g s u m m e r vacation.................... 224 46 20.5 133 59.4 43 19.2 40 17.9 3 1.3 2 .9 44 9 173 34 19.7 100 57.8 37 21.4 35 20.2 1.5 2 1.2 79 54 25 19 16 3 24.1 29.6 48 30 18 60.8 55.6 11 8 3 13.9 14.8 11 8 3 13.9 14.8 1 1.3 94 50 15 5 16.0 10.0 52 28 55.3 56.0 26 16 27.7 32.0 24 . 15 25.5 30.0 26 18 5 5 13 11 8 2 8 1 7 3 2 2 2 Fathers n ative... Fathers foreign ■bom.................... O f Englishs p e a k in g n a tio n a li ties.............. Irish........ Other___ O f non-English-speaking nation alities.......... Italian ... ItussianJewish Other___ N a t i v i t y oi fathers not re ported................ Position secured at some other t i m e .. . 4 3Î 1 3 2 1 2 1 2.1 2.0 1 1 1.1 2.0 1.5 1 599 90 15.0 276 46.1 224 37.4 193 32.2 31 5.2 9 Fathers n a tive... 157 Fathers foreign b om ..................... 2 420 O f Englishspeaking n a tio n a li ties............... 164 Irish___ 113 Other___ 51 O f non-English-speaking nation alities.......... 255 Italian ... 147 RussianJewish 44 Other___ 64 N a t i v i t y of fathers not re ported................. 22 25 15.9 89 56.7 42 26.8 39 24.8 3 1.9 1 62 14.8 176 41.9 2 174 41.4 147 35.0 2 27 6.4 8 32 21 11 19.5 18.6 21.6 82 55 27 50.0 48.7 52.9 49 37 12 29.9 32.7 23.5 47 35 12 28.7 31.0 23.5 2 2 1.2 1.8 . 1 .6 1 2. 0 30 15 11.8 10.2 94 41 36.9 27.9 124 85 48.6 57.8 100 66 39.2 44.9 24 19 9.4 12.9 7 6 2.7 4.1 7 8 12.5 20 33 51.6 16 23 35.9 14 20 31.3 2 3 4.7 3 11 8 7 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 2 Including one boy the nationality of whose father was not specified. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 1 1.9 140 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTO N . On the other hand, the children who had completed a normal grade or a higher grade than normal for their ages showed a some what less tendency to go to work during the school year. Of all chil dren who secured their positions during the summer vacation, 59.4 per cent had completed a normal grade and 20.5 per cent had com pleted a higher grade than normal. Yet of those who secured thenpositions at some other time only 46.1 per cent had completed a normal grade and 15 per cent a higher grade than normal. Nevertheless a large number of children who were not retarded went to work during the school year. Probably in many cases they did not actually drop their schooling in the middle of a grade to go to work. Table 61 shows that for the children who had completed a higher grade than normal 44.1 per cent, and of those who had completed only a normal grade 32.3 per cent, had lost one week or more of schooltime between leaving school and going to work. Many of these children, doubtless, finished a school year and then failed to return to begin the new grade in the fall. Of those who had completed a higher grade than normal over one-tenth, 11 per cent, and of those who had completed only a normal grade 6.9 per cent lost three months or more of schooltime before going to work. Comparatively few of the retarded children, on the other h a n donly 24 per cent or less than one-fourth—had intervals of one wee or more between leaving school and going to work. A very small proportion, only 1.1 per cent, lost three months or more of school work at that tune. The girls who had completed normal or higher than normal grades for their ages showed a decidedly greater tendency to stay out of school before going to work than did the boys. Over half, 51.9 per cent, of the girls and only about two-fifths, 39 per cent, of the boys who were unusually advanced in their school work, had intervals of one week or more between leaving school and going to work, and 40.9 per cent of the girls as compared with only 26.1 per cent of the boys who had completed only normal grades had such intervals. The girls, moreover, lost longer periods of schooltime than did the boys. About one-sixth, 16.7 per cent, of the girls who had com pleted higher grades than normal and over one-tenth, 11.1 per cent, of those who had completed only normal grades lost three months or more of schooltime, as compared with only 7.3 per cent and 3.8 per cent, respectively, for the same groups of boys. Among retarded children the differences between the sexes were comparatively slight. These figures confirm the conclusions reached in discussing gradecompleted^and in discussing the greater loss of school time betwe. leaving school and going to work by children, particularly girls, from the higher grades. Regular school attendance appears undoubtedly to have been more strictly enforced for the children from the lower https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 141 T E R M IN A T IO N ’ OF SC H O O L LIFE , ades—the retarded children— than for those from the upper gradesthe normal and advanced children. T a b l e 61.— Retardation, by amount o f schooltime lost, and sex; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, h ad completed, for their ages- A lower grade than normal. A higher grade th an normal. Interval between leaving school and going to work, and sex. Num ber. B o th sexes.................................. . Interval partly or wholly during school te rm ......................................... . N o schooltime lost or less th an 1 week............................................. 1 week or m ore............................... 1 week under 1 m on th ......... 1 m onth under 3 m onth s. 3 m onths under 6 m on th s.. 6 m onths or over.................... nterval entirely during vacation ... B o y s................................................ A normal grade. Total. One or tw o Three or grades lower more grades th an nor lower than mal. normal. Per Per Per Per Per cent cent cent cent cent dis N u m dis N um dis N um dis N u m dis ber. ber. ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion . tion. t i o n .1 136 100.0 409 100.0 267 100.0 233 100.0 34 85 62.5 279 68.2 227 85.0 196 84.1 81 25 60 26 19 7 8 51 18.4 44.1 19.1 14.0 5.1 5.9 37.5 147 132 70 34 20 8 130 35.9 32.3 17.1 8.3 4.9 2.0 31.8 163 64 37 24 1 2 4Q 61.0 24.0 13.9 9 .0 .4 .7 15.0 138 58 34 21 1 2 37 59.2 24.9 14.6 9 .0 .4 .9 15.9 25 6 3 3 82 100.0 238 100.0 149 100.0 135 100.0 14 3 Interval partly or wholly during schoolterm ........................................... N o schooltime lost or less th an 1 week......................... .................. 1 week or more................................ 1 week under 1 m onth.......... 1 m onth under 3 m onth s. . . 3 months under 6 m onths 6 m onths or over........ ........... Interval entirely during vacation ... 51 62.2 166 69.7 131 87.9 118 87.4 13 19 32 15 11 4 2 31 23.2 39.0 18.3 13.4 4 .9 2 .4 37.8 104 62 37 16 6 3 72 43.7 26.1 15.5 6 .7 2 .5 1.3 30.3 95 36 24 11 63.8 24.2 16.1 7.4 85 33 22 10 63.0 24.4 16.3 7.4 10 3 2 1 1 18 .7 12.1 1 17 .7 12.6 1 Girls.............................. ................. 54 100.0 171 100.0 118 100.0 98 100.0 20 34 63.0 113 66.1 96 81.4 78 79.6 18 6 28 11 8 3 6 20 11.1 51.9 20.4 14.8 5.6 11.1 37.0 43 70 33 18 14 5 58 25.1 40.9 19.3 10.5 8.2 2.9 33.9 68 28 13 13 1 1 22 57.6 23.7 11.0 11.0 .8 .8 18.6 53 25 12 11 1 1 20 54.1 25.5 12.2 11.2 1.0 1.0 20.4 15 3 1 2 Interval partly or wholly during school term ........................................... N o schooltime lost or less than 1 w eek............................................ 1 week or more................................. 1 week under 1 m onth.......... 1 month under 3 m on th s. . . •3 months under 6 m o n th s .. 6 months or over..................... Interval entirely dining vacation.. I 100.0 100.0 100.0 2 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. A larger proportion of the children who gave economic reasons for leaving school than of those who gave all other reasons were retarded— 39.9 per cent as compared with 27.2 per cent. Table 62 shows also that, conversely, a smaller proportion of those who gave economic easons than of those who gave all other reasons had completed only normal grades, 45 per cent as compared with 52.4 per cent, or higher grades than normal, 13.2 per cent as compared with 19.1 per cent. In this respect little difference appears between the boys and the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 142 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T able 62.— Retardation, by reason fo r leaving school and sex; children interviewed. Children who on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Reason for leaving school, and sex. A ll chil dren. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. Total. Three or One or two grades lower more grades lower than than normal. normal. Not reported. Num Per Num Per N um Per N um Per Num Per N um Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 B oth sexes____ 823 136 16.5 409 49.7 267 32.4 ■ 233 28.3 34 4.1 Economic reasons. . . A ll other reasons____ Discontent with 333 408 44 78 13.2 19.1 150 214 45.0 52.4 133 111 39.9 27.2 112 99 33.6 24.3 21 12 6 .3 2 .9 166 20 12.0 96 57.8 50 30.1 27.1 5 3.0 100 13 13.0 58 58.0 29 29.0 25 25.0 4 4.0 66 7 10.6 38 57.6 21 31.8 20 30.3 i 1.5 33 209 12 46 22.0 20 98 46.9 61 29.2 54 25.8 7 101 17 16.8 51 50.5 31 30.7 29 28.7 2 45 15 13 17 13 12 1 9 2 2 4 3 3 28.0 ' 7 22 26.8 i i 1.2 D isliked school or teacher___ Slow progressornonpromotion. Finished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high Other reasons___ Child wished to work___ Parent wished child to I l l n e s s of I l l n e s s in 3.3 2.0 11 61 5 1.3 1.8 1.2 1 4 1.9 2 2.0 4 10 3 Not reported............... 41 82 10 14 Í7 .Í 21 45 54.9 8 23 B o y s................... 477 82 17.2 238 49.9 149 31.2 135 28.3 Û 2 .9 8" 1.7 Economic reasons. . . All other reasons____ Discontent with 165 262 23 48 13.9 18.3 74 138 44.8 52.7 65 71 39.4 27.1 57 66 34.5 25.2 8 5 4.8 1.9 3 5 1.8 1.9 109 15. 13.8 66 60.6 28 25.7 24 22.0 4, 3.7 64 9 14.1 38 59.4 17 26.6 14 21.9 3 4.7 45 6 16 137 5 28 4 2.9 2 2.7 Other ' rea- D isliked school or teacher___ Slow progressornonFinished eighth grade and did not wish to go to high Other reasons___ Child wished to work___ Parent wished child to 111 n e s s of I l l n e s s in Other 73 13 29 9 20.4 17.8 g 10 62 36 45.3 49.3 25 50 6 il 22.0 N o t shown where base is less th an 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 43 22 31.4 42 30.7 30.1 22 30.1 8 12 11 2 2 2 2 12 26 52.0 5 13 1 10 6 2 rea- N ot reported............... 11 28 2 1 .7 1 2 26.0 1 12 24.0 1 2.0 143 T E R M IN A T IO N OF SC H O O L L IF E . X a b l e 62.— Retardation, by reason fo r leaving school and sex; children interviewed— Con. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Reason for leaving school, and sex. All chil dren / A higher grade than normal. A normal One or two Three or grades lower more grades than lower than normal. normal. Not reported. N um - Per N um - Per N um . Per N um - Per N um - Per Num - Per her. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. ber. cent. G irls................... 346 54 15.6 171 49.4 118 34.1 98 28.3 20 5.8 3 .9 E co n o m icrea so n s... A ll other reasons____ Discontent w ith school................. D isliked school or tea ch er___ Slow prog ress or nonprom otion. Finished eighth grade and did n o t wish to go to high school................. Otherreasons___ Child wished t o w ork ___ Parent wish ed child to w ork ........... I l l n e s s of child........... I l l n e s s in fa m ily ........ Other rea son s............. N o t r e p o r t e d ....... 168 146 21 30 12.5 20.5 76 76 45.2 52.1 68 40 40.5 27.4 55 33 32.7 22.6 13 7 7 .7 4.8 3 1 .8 57 5 8.8 30 52.6 22 38.6 21 36.8 1 1.8 36 4 20 12 11 21 1 10 10 10 17 72 7 18 28 4 16 4 25.0 10 36 50.0 18 25.0 12 1 Î6.7 6 15 9 7 2 6 5 5 2 3 1 3 8 3 4 1 1 16 32 4 3 9 19 3 10 2 10 8.3 1 1 One might expect that many of the children who were discontented with school would be found in the retarded list. But in fact only 29 per cent of the children who said that they had left school because they disliked their school or their teacher and only 31.8 per cent of those who stated that they left school because of slow progress or non promotion were retarded. On the other hand, comparatively small proportions, 13 per cent and 10.6 per cent, respectively, of these two groups of children had completed higher grades than normal. The girls who were discontented with school were much more frequently retarded than were the boys. These results, like those relating to the interval between leaving school and going to work, seem to confirm those arrived at in the dis cussion of the grades completed by these children before going to work. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 144 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . CONTINUATION-SCHOOL ATTENDANCE. All the children who were interviewed and most, if not all, of those for whom continuation-school records were used had the benefit of a longer or shorter period of attendance at the Boston continuation school after they went to work. This school was started in Septem ber, 1914, and attendance for four hours a week was made compul sory under the terms of the Massachusetts continuation-school law of 1913,60 which provided that “ when the school committee of any city or town shall have established continuation schools or courses of instruction for the education of minors between 14 and 16 years of age regularly employed in such city or town not less than six hours per day, such school committee may, with the consent of the State board of education, require the attendance in such continuation schools or on such courses of instruction of every such minor thereafter receiving an employment certificate and who is not otherwise receiv ing instruction approved by the school committee or equivalent to that provided in schools established under the provisions of this act.” Two methods of enforcing this act were provided by the law. First, the employer was required to discharge a child as soon as he was notified in writing by the superintendent of schools or his repre sentative that the child was not attending continuation school as required by law. Any employer failing to discharge a child after such notification was liable to a fine of from $10 to $100 for each offense. Second, the superintendent of schools might revoke the employment certificate of any child who failed to attend continua tion school. There was no fine for either the child or the parent. At the. time of this study a continuation-school clerk was stationed in the certificate office, and as soon as a child had secured his employ ment certificate he was sent to her to be registered in the school. This clerk filled out a card record with information seemed in part from the child himself and in part from a personal record card sent by the child’s teacher or the vocational counselor of his school. The former card contained spaces for information concerning four different positions and for ratings in four different continuation-school classes, and furnished a permanent record of the child’s employment and con tinuation-school history. A t the same time the clerk assigned the child to a continuation-school class and gave him a card stating the days and hours when he must attend. This card the child showed to his employer and then presented it at the school. When a child changed positions his new employer was sent a notice stating that' the child must continue to attend continuation school. Acts of 1913. ch. 805. secs. 1-8. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N OF SC H O O L L IF E . 145 y-Three times a year the teacher made out for each child a record Containing his ratings, not in the special subjects studied, but in “ interest, application, accuracy, initiative, punctuality, courtesy, neatness, and accomplishment.” The child was rated not only on his work in school but also on his record in employment. The data for the employment ratings were secured by interviews with the em ployer, superintendent, or foreman who was in immediate control of the child’s work. All continuation-school teachers were allowed 121hours a week to visit the homes and the places of employment of their pupils and to become familiar with what they were doing and with their vocational and other needs. Most of the continuation-school classes were conducted at the school building, which was only about a block from the employment certificate office, in a convenient location for children who worked in the mercantile district) but some classes were conducted in estab lishments where children were employed. Whenever an establish ment had a sufficient number of pupils and offered facilities, the policy was to conduct classes in the establishment instead of requiring the children to go to the school building. A t the time of this study, /fiasses were conducted in a large shoe factory, in a lace curtain factory, in a number of department stores. The term of the compulsory continuation-school in Boston was the same as that of the regular day school except that it had no spring vacation but instead closed during the week before Christmas. This arrangement was made for the convenience of mercantile establish ments where many of the continuation-schools pupils were at work. The periods of attendance were for four consecutive hours on a single day, for two consecutive hours on two days, or for one hour on each of four days. About 70 per cent of the children who attended classes at the continuation-school building were in four-hour classes, but in classes conducted in establishments the children attended for twohour periods. Few children were in single-hour classes. The work of the Boston continuation school at the time of this study was frankly experimental and its first and foremost policy was flexibility. Classes were divided into three kinds: (1) General im provement classes for pupils who were not in skilled employments and had no specific vocational aim, (2) prevocational classes for pupils who had well-defined vocational aims but whose work did not offer preparation for the vocations they had selected, and (3) trade-exten sio n classes for pupils who were in skilled employment. Each class ^'as composed of not more than 25 and, whenever possible, not more tljan 15 pupils; and usually, but not always, girls and boys were taught separately. The trade-extension classes were naturally small, as opportunities for children under 16 to enter skilled trades were rare. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 146 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The proportion of time allotted to the various subjects and types of instruction in the different classes was as follows: General im provem ent classes: Propor tion of time. Civics, hygiene, cultural studies, and recreation.................................. .................. \ Discovery of interests and powers................................................................................... 1 Training, based on acquirement, to remove deficiencies and improve ac quirem ent.................................................................................. - .......... ...............................• i Prevocational classes: Civics, hygiene, cultural studies, and recreation..................................................... i Information related to shopwork................................................................................. i Shop work................................................................................................................................. - 1 Trade-extension classes: Civics, hygiene, cultural studies, and recreation..................................................... \ Shopwork and information related to the shop......................................................... I The subjects taught were: Woodworking, metal working, electrical work, plumbing, printing, shoe-factory work, bookbinding, sales manship, stenography and typewriting, telephone operating, clerical work, power-machine operating, dressmaking, millinery, cooking, and homemaking. Only children who had completed the grammarschool course were admitted to the classes in stenography and typewriting, in telephone operating, and in electrical work. No attempt was made, however, to teach trades, even in the trad'd . extension classes, where the object was merely to furnish the pupils with a broader knowledge of the trades in which they were actually engaged than they could obtain in the shop alone. On the other hand, none of the work was mere manual training. Even in the general improvement classes an attempt was made to have all instruction as concrete as possible, and in the prevocational and trade-extension classes the academic work was closely related to the vocation which the child was studying. Arithmetic problems, for example, were actual problems growing out of the vocation, and the reading was directed largely toward cultivating the child’s knowledge of and interest in his chosen occupation. In the prevoca tional classes actual shop conditions were imitated and the child was given work of the same practical character as he would actually encounter in the trade. Orders were taken fcr certain kinds of work, as for printing. Much of the printing for the school committee, and some outside work, was done in the continuation school. In some cases castings were sent from commercial shops to be made up at the school. These were not always paid orders, as sometimes the expense of transporting back and forth and the cost of spoiled castings counter balanced the value of the work done, but they secured practice work for the continuation-school pupils. In other cases the principal of the school bought materials and sold the product— as, for example, cheap tables and wooden rollers for scrub pails— at wholesale market prices. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T E R M IN A T IO N OF SCH O O L L IF E . 147 A child was usually assigned first to a general improvement class, where he remained until he developed a preference for some one of the prevocational classes. He might stay in the general im provement class for only two or three days or, if he expressed no desire for a change and was progressing satisfactorily in his studies, he might remain there throughout the whole period of his compulsory continuation-school attendance. The child was given every oppor tunity when he first entered to learn what the school had to offer and what were the prospects in the various callings, and was allowed free choice among the classes. The opportunities afforded by the occupation or industry in which he was already employed, however, were usually emphasized by his teachers. Even when he had entered one class he might change to another if he wished or if he was not doing good work. Thus the child had an opportunity to test himself in different occupations. Many employers at first resented the requirement of continuationschool attendance for the children in their establishments, and undoubtedly the immediate reaction of some of them was to do away altogether with the employment of children under 16. But they soon became adjusted to the new requirement, and many of ihem, it was said at the time of this study, had already learned to welcome the continuation school as a material aid in the training of their employees. When this study was made children who had been at work but were temporarily unemployed* were not expected to return to the schools which they had left before going to work, but were supposed to attend continuation school four hours every day, instead of only four horns a week. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WORK BEFORE LEAVING SCHOOL. All the children for whom continuation-school records were used and also all who were interviewed had left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays. In the group of 4,401 children who took out certificates in Boston, however, were included 857, or 19.5 per cent of the total number, who, according to the records, worked only during school vacations or outside school hours. These children did not leave school until after they became 16, and before that age, therefore, they were not regular but merely vacation workers. While all the 823 children interviewed, moreover, had left school for regular positions before becoming 16— most of them soon after becoming 14— 324, or 39,4 per cent of the total number, had also worked during vacations or out of school hours before leaving school. This work was not all carried on under the authority of an employ ment certificate. As the information for these children was secured directly from them and not from records, gainful labor is include" which was performed both before and after their fourteenth birth days and without as well as with certificates. The vacation workers included in the certificate group of children, who did not leave school before becoming 16, may also have held positions before they were 14 or for which they secured no certificates, but for them no informa tion as to such positions was secured. These two groups of children who worked before leaving school differ, therefore, not only in the fact that the children in one did not, while those in the other did, become regular workers before their sixteenth birthdays, but also in the character of the information secured. In the first group the information relates only to certi ficated positions, all of which must have been held after the children became 14, and in the second to all positions, regardless of certifica tion, of the child’s age, and even of the legality of the work. SEX, NATIVITY, AND FATHER’S NATIONALITY. The certificate group of vacation workers was composed of 519 boys and 338 girls. In other words, 60.6 per cent of this group were boys and 39.4 per cent girls. As only 40.2 per cent of all the children who took out certificates in Boston were girls it is evident tha nearly as large a proportion of girls as compared with boys took ou certificates for vacation work as for regular work. Of the 324 interviewed children who had worked before leaving school, however, only 44, or 13.6 per cent, were girls. Apparently only a few of the 148 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 149 W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SCH OO L. girls, as compared with the boys, who took regular positions soon ¡after becoming of legal age to work had been gainfully employed before leaving school. More than one-half, 58.7 per cent, of the boys, but only about one-eighth, 12.7 per cent, of the girls, who were inter viewed had worked before leaving school.62 The cause of this differ ence is doubtless the fact that the opportunities open to girls for work out of school hours are few as compared with those open to boys. Most of the girls who worked without leaving school before becoming 16. held full-time positions during school vacations, whereas many of the boys were engaged in street trades or other irregular work out side school hours. This difference will be further discussed in con sidering the occupations of vacation and regular workers. 63.— N ativity and sex; comparison o f vacation and regular workers issued certifi cates in B oston and regular workers interviewed who worked and did n ot work before leaving school. T able Children issued certificates in Boston who, before becoming 16, worked— jj N ativity and sex of child. During vacation or out of school hours only. N um ber. Regularly. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Children interviewed who left school to work before becoming 16, and who, before leaving school— Worked. D id not work. Per Per N um N um cent cent distri ber. distri ber. bution. bution.1 Per cent distri bution. B oth s3xes. 857 100.0 23,544 100.0 324 100.0 499 100.0 N a tiv e................ Foreign-born.. . 733 124 85.5 14.5 2,876 667 81.2 18.8 265 59 81.8 18.2 392 107 78.6 21.4 519 | 100.0 2 2^ 114 100.0 280 100.0 197 100.0 1, 769 344 83.7 16.3 236 44 84.3 15.7 165 32 83.8 16.2 338 J 100. 0 1,430 100.0 44 100.0 302 100.0 287 51 1,107 323 77.4 22.6 29 15 227 75 75.2 24.8 B o y s ............ N a tiv e................. F oreign-bom ... G irls............ N ative................. Foreign-born.. . 446 73 85.9 14.1 84.9 15.1 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 2 Including one boy for w hom nativity w as not reported. Native children furnished a somewhat larger proportion of vacation workers than of regular workers, and also a somewhat larger pro portion of the children interviewed who worked than of those who did not work before leaving school. Table 63 shows also that only 14.5 per cent of the children who took out certificates for work only during vacation or out of school hours before their sixteenth birth’ays were foreign born, as compared with 18.8 per cent of those who ook out certificates for regular positions. This table shows further « See Table 67. p. 153. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 150 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . that of the children interviewed, all of whom were in regular positions before they were 16 and most of them before they were 15, th* foreign born constituted only 18.2 per cent of those who worked as compared with 21.4 per cent of those who did not work before leaving school. Apparently the native children who went to work before their sixteenth birthdays were more likely than were the foreign-born children to combine school and work. This conclusion, however, holds true only for the boys. The oppo site tendency is seen among foreign-born girls, for they constituted 34*1 per cent of those who worked as compared with only 24.8 per cent of those who did not work before leaving school. The Italians, as appears in Table 64,. furnished a particularly small proportion, 2.7 per cent, of the vacation workers as compared with 7.4 per cent of the regular workers. Moreover, among the interviewed children the Italians furnished only 6.8 per cent of those who had worked, as compared with 13.6 per cent of those who had not worked before leaving school. Evidently the Italian children were more likely to leave school for work than merely to work after school hours or during vacation. T a b l e 64. — Place o f birth; comparison o f vacation and regular worlcers issued certifi cates in B oston and regular workers interviewed who worked and did not work before, leaving school. Children issued certificates in Boston who, before becoming 16, worked— Place of birth. During vacation or out of school hours only. N um ber. Regularly. Per N um cent ber. distri bution. Children interviewed who left school to work before becoming 16, and who, before leaving school— Worked. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. D id not work. Per cent N um ber. distri bution. Per cent distri bution. A ll children.......................... ............ 857 100.0 13,544 100.0 324 100.0 499 100.0 N a tiv e .......................... ................................. Foreign-born................................................ Place of birth: British North Am erica............ England, Scotland, W ales___ Ireland........................................... Ita ly ................................................ R ussia............................................ Other........................ ..................... 733 124 85.5 .14.5 2,876 667 81.2 18.8 265 59 81.8 18.2 392 107 78.6 21.4 10 17 6 23 51 17 1.2 2.0 .7 2.7 6.0 2.0 46 74 17 261 215 54 1.3 2.1 .5 7 .4 6.1 1.5 3 7 5 22 15 7 .9 2 .2 1.5 6 .8 4 .6 2 .2 2 11 1 68 18 7 .4 2.2 .2 13.6 3 .6 1.4 1 Including one child for whom nativity was not reported. The nativity of the fathers is known only for the interviewed^ children. In this group, as appears in Table 65, a larger proportio; of the native children of native fathers than of the native children of foreign-born fathers or of the foreign-born children, 41.3 per cent, 39.6 per cent and 35.5 per cent, respectively, worked before leaving school. The boys show the same order of nativity groups, though https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WORK BEFO R E L E A V IN G 151 SCH O O L. much larger proportions in each group worked before leaving school— "9.1 per cent of the native sons of native fathers, 58.7 per cent of the native sons of foreign-born fathers, and 57.9 per cent of the foreignborn boys. The girls, however, show exactly the opposite order of nativity groups, with much smaller proportions in each; only 10.8 per cent of the native daughters of native fathers had worked before leaving school, as compared with 12 per cent of the native daughters of foreign-bom fathers, and with 16.7 per cent of the foreign-bom girls. Evidently the native girls whose fathers were also native were less likely than were the girls of either of the other groups to combine school with work. T able 65. - -E m ploym ent before leaving school, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children in te r v ie w e d . Children who, before leaving school- N ativity of father and nativity and sex of child. A ll chil dren. W orked. D id not work. Num ber. Per cent.1 Num ber. Per cent.1 Both sexes................................. 823 Both fathers and children n ative. Fathers foreign born.......................... Children native............................ Children foreign born................ Nativity of fathers not reported... 201 593 427 166 29 B o y s............................................ 477 B oth fathers and children native. Fathers foreign born.......................... Children native................ -.......... Children foreign born................ Nativity of fathers not reported... Girls............................................ Both fathers and children native. Fathers foreign born.......................... Children native............................ Children foreign born................ Nativity of fathers not reported... 346 324 39.4 41.3 38.4 39.6 35.5 280 60.6 118 365 258 107 16 58.7 61.6 60.4 64.5 58.7 41.3 59.1 58.5 58.7 57.9 40.9 41.5 41.3 42.1 12.7 302 87.3 10.8 13.6 12.0 16.7 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. From Table 66 it appears further that the children whose fathers came from south and east Europe showed less tendency to work be fore leaving school or to put off leaving school by working outside school hours than the children whose fathers came from north and west Europe. This was due apparently to the comparatively small proportion of Italian children, and especially Italian girls, who had worked while still in school. Only 27.9 per cent of all the Italian hildren, 54.1 per cent of the boys but barely 8 per cent of the girls, rad worked before leaving school. This tendency among the Italians, numerically the largest group of children whose fathers were foreign born, counterbalanced an opposite tendency among the RussianJewish children, 48.6 per cent of whom worked before leaving school. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 152 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . Of the chikiren whose fathers were Irish, who constituted the second largest group of foreign parentage, only 37.7 per cent worked befo' leaving school— a smaller proportion than of the children whos fathers were native. T able 6 6 . — Em ploym ent before leaving school, by nationality o f father and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who, before leaving school— ♦ N ationality of father and sex of child. A ll chil dren- D id n ot work. W orked. Num ber. Per cent.1 Num ber. Per cent.1 I 1 Both sexes........................................................................ Nativity of fathers not reported.......................................... 823 324 39.4 499 60.6 201 593 258 51 167 40 297 70 197 30 38 29 83 228 105 21 63 21 106 34 55 17 17 13 41.3 38.4 40.7 41.2 37.7 118 365 153 30 104 19 191 36 142 13 21 16 58.7 61.6 59.3 58.8 62.3 280 58.7 197 41.3 B o y s . . .......................... - ......... 64.3 51.4 72.1 59.1 58.5 56.4 Fathers native.......... ; . ..................... Fathers foreign born........................ North and west Europe.......... English and Scotch.......... Irish.................................... .. Other..................................... South and east Europe........... Russian-J ewish.................. Italian.................................. . Other.................................... O t h e r ...:.................................... N ativity of fathers not reported. Girls........................................- 35.7 48.6 27.9 346 12.7 87.3 Fathers native.................................. Fathers foreign born...................... North and west Europe........ English and Scotch......... Irish..................................... Other.................................... South and east Europe......... Russian-J ewish................ Ita lia n ................................ Other:.................................. Other............................................ N ativity of fathers not reported. i N ot shown where base is less than 50. A G E A T S E C U R IN G F IR S T S C H O O L P O S IT I O N .63 As already stated, 857, or 19.5 per cent, of the 4,401 children who took out employment certificates in Boston worked only during vaca tion or out of school hours. In other words, about one child out of every five who took out a first certificate did not actually leave scho before his sixteenth birthday. But that many of these childr probably went to work during a vacation before the end of which they would have become 16 and did not attend school after that age 63 B y **school position” is meant a position held b y a child only during vacation or outside school hours an d before he had left school for work. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 153 W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SCH OO L. seems to be indicated by the fact shown in Table 67 that over half of them, 5‘0.5 per cent, were between 15£ and 16 years of age, as com pared with less than one-fourth, 23.7 per cent, of the regular workers’. Nevertheless, many of these children doubtless worked outside school hours and during vacations while continuing their schooling, for, as will be seen later,84 nearly half of them were in high school as compared with not much more than one-eighth of the regular workers. T able 67.— A ge at taking out first certificate and sex o f vacation and regular workers; children issued certificates in B oston. Children who worked— All children. Regularly. Age and sex. Number. Both, sexes. Per cent distriNumber. bution. During vacation or out of school hours. Per cent Per cent distriNumber. distribution. bution. 4,401 100.0 3,544 100.0 857 14 under 14£. 14J under 15. 15 under 151. 151 under 16. 1 1,381 854 892 1,274 31.4 19.4 20.3 28.9 1,245 719 739 841 35.1 20.3 20.9 23.7 136 135 153 433 100.0 . 15.9 15.8 17.9 50.5 B o y s.. 2,633 100.0 2,114 100.0 519 100.0 14 under 141. 141 under 15. 15 under 151151 under 16. 838 473 562 760 31.8 18.0 21.3 28.9 747 399 470 498 35.3 18.9 22.2 23.6 91 74 92 262 17.5 14.3 17.7 50.5 G irls... 1,768 100.0 1,430 100.0 338 100.0 14 under 141-. 141 under 15., 15 under 151-. 151 under 16.. 543 381 330 514 30.7 21.5 Ì8.7 29.1 498 320 269 343 34.8 22.4 18.8 24.0 45 61 61 171 13.3 18.0 18.0 50.6 1 Including three children who went to work before they were 14 years of age according to continuationschool records, but who did not secure employment certificates until after they were 14. The large proportion of vacation workers who were in high school should be considered, however, in connection with their ages. Only 15.9 per cent of these vacation workers took out their first certifi cates before they were 14^ years of age as compared with 35.1 per cent of the regular workers. Similar differences are found for both boys and girls, though the proportion of girls taking out certificates for vacation work when under 14^ was only 13.3 per cent as com pared with 17.5 per cent of boys. A larger proportion of the girls than of the boys, on the other hand, took out certificates when between 14£ and 15 years of age. In this group, of course, none of he positions were held before the children were 14. Many of the children interviewed, on the other hand, gave informa tion as to gainful work before their fourteenth birthdays, in some cases even before their tenth birthdays. Of the 324 children who M See p . 165. 4 9 4 7 0°— 22- -11 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 154 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. worked before leaving school, only 46, according to Table 68, secured their first school positions after they were 14 years of age. Many of the interviewed children took regular positions so soon after becoming 14 that there was no time for them to have vacation or out of school hours positions after that age. The age at securing first school position had to be tabulated as “ not reported’ in 135 cases, 41.7 per cent of the total number, usually because the children could not accurately remember the date. As they would be much more likely to remember comparatively recent dates than earlier ones it is probable that most of the children who failed to report on this point had begun work before they were 14 and many of them before they were 12. Even of those who reported, 40 children began before they were 12— 12 boys before they were 10— while 36 began between 12 and 13, and 67 between 13 and 14 years of age. T a b l e 6 8 . — A ge at securing first school position, by age at securing first regular position and sex; interviewed children who worked before leaving school. Children who worked before leaving school. Age at securing first regular position. Age at securing first school position and sex of child. Total. Under 14i. Number. . Both sexes.............. Per cent Number. distri bution.! 100.0 157 100.0 144 Under 12 years of age— Under 10...................... 10 under 11.................. 11 under 12.................. 12 under 14 years of age. 12 under 13.................. 13 under 14.................. 14 under 15 years of age. 14 under 144................ 144 under 15................ Not reported...................... Boys.......................... 14J and under 16. Per cent Number. distri bution.! Per cent distri bution.! 100.0 100.0 64 136 100.0 31 100.0 Under 12 years of age— Under 10...................... 10 under 11.................. 11 under 12.................. 12 under 14 years of age. 12 under 13.................. 13 under 14.................. 14 under 15 years of age. 14 under 144................ 144 under 1 5 . . . . . . . . . Not reported............ .. Girls.......................... Under 12 years of age.. .. 11 under 12.................. 12 under 14 years of age. 12 under 13.................. 13 under 14.......... — 14 under 15 years of age. 14 under 144— 144 under 15.............. . N ot reported.................... 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SCHOO L. 155 A much larger proportion of girls than of boys who worked before leaving school secured their first school positions after they were 14, and only two girls began work under 12 and none under 11. Nearly half, 21,. of the 44 girls took their first school positions after the age of 14. The children who had worked before they were 14 showed a strong tendency to secure regular positions as soon as they reached that age. Of the 128 boys who reported having worked before their fourteenth birthdays, 80, or 62.5 per cent, took regular positions within the first three months after those birthdays. And of the 15 girls who reported having worked before they were 14, 9 secured regular positions before they were 14 years and 3 months old. KIND OF FIRST SCHOOL POSITION. According to Table 69 for the interviewed group 21.9 per cent of all the first positions held by the 324 children who had been employed before leaving school involved only work during vacation periods. The proportion of girls was much larger than that of boys, for 30 out of 44 girls and only 41 out of 280 boys had first positions of this kind, but about two-fifths, 40.7 per cent, of both sexes, and not far from If, 45.7 per cent, of the boys alone, worked during both vacation and school term in their first positions. And over one-third, 34.9 per cent, of both sexes and a somewhat larger proportion, 37.5 per cent, of the boys alone worked only during school term. One-ninth 11.1 per cent, of the children worked only on Saturdays and about one-sixth, 16.7 per cent, both on Saturdays and before and after school hours. The girls, as already stated, usually had first positions involving only vacation work and consequently each of the per centages relating to work at any time during a school term is higher for hoys alone than for both sexes. The native boys whose fathers were native appear to have been less likely than those whose fathers were foreign-born to work during schoolterm only and more likely to work during vacation only. At any rate 34.7 per cent of the native sons of native fathers and 42.6 per cent of the native sons of foreign-born fathers held first school positions which were for work during schoolterm only. On the other hand, 16 per cent of the native sons of native fathers and 13.5 per cent of the native sons of foreign-born fathers held first positions that were for work during vacation only. Not far from qne-fourth, 22.3 per cent, of the native boys whose fathers were )reign born, as compared with only 14.7 per cent of those whose fathers were also native, held first positions which involved work both on Saturdays and before and after school hours. More than half, 26 out of 44, of the foreign-born boys worked both during vacation and schoolterm in their first positions. The number of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 156 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. foreign-bom girls who worked before leaving school is too small to justify any similar comparison for them. In 22 of the 324 first school positions the employer was a parent or relative. These positions were held by 22 children, 5 girls and 17 boys. T a b l e 69 .— K in d o f first school position, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex of child; interviewed children who worked before leaving school. Children who worked before leaving school. Fathers foreign b om . Both fathers and children native. Total. K ind of first school position and sex. N um ber. Both sexes...................... B o y s................................. V acation o n ly............... Vacation and schoolterm___ Out of school horns........ Dining school hours 2___ Schoolterm___ ....■ ................. Saturday only............ Before and after sch ool.. Saturday and before and after school.......... .......... N ot reported............... ............. . Girls................................. . Children for eign born. Per Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent N um cent distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri bution.1 bution.1. bution.1 bution.1 324 Vacation on ly........................... Vacation and schoolterm___ Out of school hours........ During school hours* ... Schoolterm................................ Saturday only.................. Before and-after sch ool.. Saturday and before and after school.............. . During school h ours2. . . Not reported............................. Children na tive. 83 100.0 100.0 100.0 22.9 41.0 39.8 18.9 39.1 37.9 28.8 45.8 45.8 1.2 32.5 1.2 12.0 40.2 13.0 5.9 100.0 100.0 6.0 Nativ ity of fathers not re ported; chil dren native. 13 16.7 280 100.0 13 16.0 45.3 44.0 1.3 34.7 13.3 6.7 18.6 2.1 14.7 4.0 100.0 100.0 22.3 1.4 100.0 Vacation o n ly..... .................... Vacation and schoolterm .. . Out of school hours........ During school hours2. .. Schoolterm................................ Saturday only.................. Before and after school. . Saturday and before and after school.................... During school hours 2. . . Not reported___|........... ........ 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. 2 Of the six children who worked during school hours, three boys and two girls did so for only a few days at the beginning or end of a schoolterm. AMOUNT OF WORK DONE IN SCHOOL POSITIONS. Two-thirds, 66.7 per cent, of the children interviewed who had worked before leaving school, as appears in Table 70, held only one school position. This proportion was even higher for the girls than for the boys. Only 7 girls held more than one position. But over https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WORK BEFORE L E A V IN G 157 SCH O O L. one-fifth, 21.3 per cent, of all the children held two positions; nearly ^one-tenth, 9.3 per cent, three positions; and 9 boys, 2.8 per cent of the total number of children, four or more positions each. Six children held two positions simultaneously; and one of them had two such combinations. T a b l e 7 0 . — N u m ber o f school p o sitio n s held, by n a tiv ity o f father and n a tiv ity and sex o f ch ild; in terview ed children w ho w orked before leaving school. Children who worked before leaving school. Fathers foreign born. B oth fathers and children native. Total. Number of school positions held and sex. N um ber. Both sexes___ 324 B o y s................ 100.0 100.0 1.2 100.0 63.9 22.9 68.0 10.0 12.0 1.3 63.5 23.0 9.5 4.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 Girls................. 100.0 100.0 10.8 ■ 1 position.................... 2 positions.................. 3 positions.................. 4 or more positions. 169 65.7 21.3 9.5 3.6 18.1 280 Children for eign b om . Per Per Per Per cent N um N um N um cent cent cent distri distri distri ber. distri ber. ber. bution.1 bution.1 bution.1 bution.1 1 position................... 2 positions.................. .3 positions.................. 4 or more positions. f Children na tive. 3 .2 75 18.7 Nativ ity of fathers not re ported: chil dren native. 59 100.0 1 position.................... 2 positions.................. 3 positions.................. 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. For the girls the numbers are too small for any comparison by nativity. A larger proportion of the native boys whose fathers were also native than of those whose fathers were foreign born, 68 per cent, as compared with 63.5 per cent, held only one position. Table 71 shows that more than one-third, 34.6 per cent, of the posi tions held by children before leaving school lasted less than three months, but nearly as large a proportion, 30.2 per cent, lasted for one year or more and almost one-sixth, 15.9 per cent, for two years or more. This table also shows that the positions held by girls were shorter than those held by boys, as would be expected from the fact that a larger proportion of them were during vacation only. About iree-fifths, 60.4 per cent, of the positions held by girls lasted less tjhan three months, and less than one-tenth, 9.5 per cent, more than a year. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 158 T H È W O R K IN G CHILDREN- OF B O STO N . T a b l e 71.— Tim e em ployed and sex; school positions held by interviewed children w h & j worked before leaving school. 1 School positions held b y— Girls. B oj A ll children. Tim e employed in each school position. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. T o ta l........... ................. Under 3 m onths................... Under 1 week................ 1 week under 1 m onth. 1 m onth under 2 .......... 2 months under 3 ......... 3 m onths under 6 ................. 6 months under 12............... 6 m onths under 9 .......... 9 months under 12-----12 months under 24............. 12 m onths under 1 8 . .. 18 months under 2 4 . . . 24 m onths and over............. N ot reported.......................... 483 100.0 430 167 12 48 37 70 92 68 52 16 69 52 17 77 10 34.6 2.5 9.9 7.7 14.5 19.0 14.1 10.8 3.3 14.3 10.8 3.5 15.9 2.1 135 7 39 31 58 82 64 50 14 67 50 17 74 8 Per cent Number. distribu tion. 100.0 53 100.0 T a b l e 72 — H ours weekly and sex; school positions held by interviewed children who worked before leaving school. School positions held by— A ll children. Girls. Boys. Hours weekly. Per cent Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. tion. T o t a l.................... Under 12.......................... Under 4............ — 4 under 8 .................. 8 under 12................ 12 under 24...................... 24 to 48 (inclusive)-----24 under 36.............. 36 under 42.............. 42 under 48.............. 48 even..................... Over 48............................. Over 48, under 54. 54 and over............. N ot reported..............- • 483 100.0 121 14 45 62 154 156 64 23 42 27 25 11 14 27 25.1 2.9 9.3 12.8 31.9 32.3 13.3 4.8 8.7 5.6 5.2 2.3 2.9 5.6 430 116 13 43 60 150 124 60 16 30 18 20 7 13 20 100.0 53 100.0 27.0 3.0 10.0 14.0 34.9 28.8 14.0 3.7 7.0 4 .2 4.7 1.6 3.0 4.7 5 1 2 2 4 32 4 7 12 9 5 4 1 7 9 .4 1.9 3.8 3.8 7. 5 60.4 7.5 13.2 22.6 17.0 9 .4 7.5 1.9 13.2 In approximately one-fourth, 25.1 per cent, of their school posi tions, according to Table 72, the children worked less than 12 hours a week, and in not far from one-third, 31.9 per cent, between 12 and 24 hours. In nearly another third, 32.3 per cent, of the school posi tions held by-both sexes and in 60.4 per cent of those held by girl; the hours were between 24 and 48 a week. Comparatively few of thè boys only 19.6 per cent, but the great majority of the girls, 62.2 per https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 159 W O B K BEFOBE L E A V IN G SCH O O L. reent, worked over 36 hours— indeed, 9.4 per cent of the girls worked over 48 hours, as compared with only 4.7 per cent of the boys. It should be remembered in this connection, of course, that the positions held by girls were much more generally for work during school vaca tion, and that a larger proportion of the girls than of the boys were over 14 years of age when they first went to work. T a b l e 73.— Tim e em ployed, by hours weekly and sex; school positions held by interviewed children who worked before leaving school. School positions of specified w eekly hours. Under 12. Tim e employed and sex of child. N um ber. 12 under 24. 24 to 48 (inclu sive). Over 48. Not re Per Per Per Per ported. N um cent cent N um N um cent cent distri distri ber. distri distri ber. ber. bution.1 bution.1 bution.1 bution.1 Both sexes....................... 121 100.0 154 100.0 156 100.0 25 3 months, under 6 ..................... 6 months) under 12................... 12 months, under 24................. 24 months and over.................. N ot reported............................... 35 25 19 19 20 3 28.9 20.7 15.7 15.7 16.5 2.5 34 22 30 28 36 4 22.1 14.3 19.5 18.2 23.4 2.6 80 28 16 17 14 1 51.3 17.9 10.3 10.9 9.0 .6 14 10 1 B o y s................................... 116 100.0 150 100.0 124 100.0 20 32 25 17 19 20 3 27.6 21.6 14.7 16.4 17.2 2.6 34 21 29 28 35 3 22.7 14.0 19.3 18.7 23.3 2.0 55 23 15 17 13 1 44.4 18.5 12.1 13.7 10.5 .8 11 8 1 Girls.................................... 5 100.0 4 100.0 32 100.0 5 Under 3 m onths........................ 3 6 months) under 12................... 2 1 1 1 1 25 5 1 100.0 27 4 7 2 5 7 2 100.0 20 3 5 2 3 6 1 100.0 7 1 2 3 2 1 $ 2 1 1 iN ot shown where base is less than 50. When the weekly hours are considered in connection with the time employed, as in Table 73, it is found that over half, 51.3 per cent, of all the positions in which the hours were from 24 to 48 a week were held for less than three months. Practically one-fifth of them, how ever, 19.9 per cent, were held for over a year. Of those which ended in less than three months a larger proportion were held by girls than by boys. The shorter hour positions were more evenly distributed according to the time spent in each, but a surprisingly large proporeek lasted for over two years. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 160 T H E W O R K IN G CHELEKEN OF BOSTON . EARNINGS IN SCHOOL POSITIONS.65 A The weekly wages depended naturally to -a considerable extent upon the amount of time the children were employed weekly. Table 74 gives the wages of children whose work fell into the different hour groups. In over half, 51.2 per cent, of the positions in which the hours were under 12 the children either worked one day a week only or received no cash or only part cash; and in considerably over onefourth, 29.8 per cent, of these positions they received less than $2 a week. In over one-fourth, 27.9 per cent, of the positions in which the hours were from 12 to 24 they received less than $2. None of the girls who held positions in this hour group made over $2 a week. But of the positions held b y boys in which the hours were 12 but less than 24, in more than one-fourth, 26.7 per cent, their wages were $2 but less than $3, and in nearly as large a proportion, 23.3 per cent, they were $3 but less than $4. It is somewhat surprising to find that in these positions with comparatively short hours, averaging from two to four a day, 13 boys, 8.7 per cent, made $4 or more a week, three of them $6 or over. The children who worked from 24 to 48 hours a week naturally received considerably higher wages than those who worked shorter hours. In more than one-third of these positions, 35.3 per cent, tHe children made $4 or more; in about one-fourth, 25.6 per cent, $4 but less than $5. In nearly as large a proportion, 30.1 per cent, however, the weekly wages were only from $3 to $4. In connection with these earnings it is interesting to note to what extent the economic needs of the family may have influenced the child to secure employment before leaving school. Table 75 shows that of the interviewed boys who gave economic reasons for leaving school only a slightly larger proportion than of those who gave other reason^, 58.2 per cent as compared with 57.6 per cent, had worked before they left school. And of the interviewed girls an even smaller proportion of those who gave economic reasons than of those who gave other reasons, 8.3 per cent as compared with 11 per cent, had worked before leaving school. It should be remembered, however, that the reason given by the child for leaving school may not always have been the true one. 65 in some cases the children worked on their own account in street trades and other similar occupations and their compensation did not, therefore, consist technically of wages, but to make possible a general view of the compensation received this comparatively unimportant distinction has been ignored and such earnings have been classified along with actual wages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 161 W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SC H O O L. T able 7 4 . — W eekly wage, by hours weekly and sex; school positions held by interviewed children who worked before leaving school. School positions of specified weekly hours. Total. Weekly wage and sex of child. Under 12. 12 under 24. Over 48. Not rePer Per Per Per Per portcent cent cent cent cent ed. Num- distri- Num- distri- Num- distri- Num- distri- Num- distriber. bu- ber. bu- ber. bu- ber. bu- ber. bution. tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 Both sexes............................ 483 100.0 Under $2......................................... Under #1.................................. $1 under $2.............................. $2 under S3..................................... S3 under $4..................................... $4 and over..................................... $4 under $5............................... S5 under 86.............................. S6and over............................. Other.............................................. Worked 1 day a week only__ No cash wage or onlv part cash Not reported.................................. 95 19.7 5.8 28 67 13.9 90 18.6 99 20.5 83 17.2 61 12.6 13 2.7 1.9 9 98 20.3 73 15.1 5.2 25 18 3.7 121 100.0 36 18 18 15 3 2 2 29.8 14.9 14.9 12.4 2.5 1.7 1.7 62 59 3 3 51.2 48.8 2.5 2.5 43 8 35 40 35 13 9 1 3 19 13 6 4 27. 9 5.2 22.7 26.0 22.7 8.4 5.8 .6 1.9 12.3 8.4 3.9 2.6 Boys..................................... 430 100.0 88 20.5 26 6.0 62 14.4 85 19.8 86 20.0 67 15.6 47 10.9 11 2.6 9 2.1 88 20.5 70 16.3 18 4.2 16 3.7 Girls...................................... 53 100.0 5 100.0 4 100.0 Under 82......................................... Under 81.................................. 81 under 82.............................. 82 under 83..................................... 83 under 84..................................... 84 and over..................................... 84 under 85............................... 85 under 86.............................. 86 and over................. ............ Other.............................................. Worked 1 day a week only__ No cash wage or only part cash Not reported. .7 .......... .................. 7 13.2 2 3.8 5 9.4 5 9.4 13 24.5 16 30.2 14 26.4 2 3.8 1 1 3 1 2 10 • 3 7 2 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 18.9 5.7 13.2 3.8 116 100.0 154 100.0 Under 82......................................... Under $1.................................. ►—>81 under 82.............................. 82 under 83..................................... 83 under 84..................................... 84 and over..................................... 84 under 85.............................. $5 under 86.............................. 86 and over.............................. Other.............................................. Worked 1 day a week only__ No cash wage or only part cash Not reported................................. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 24 to 48 (inclusive). 35 17 18 14 3 2 2 30.2 14.7 15.5 12.1 2.6 1.7 1.7 59 57 2 3 50.9 49.1 1.7 2.6 1 3 2 1 150 100.0 40 7 33 40 35 13 9 1 3 18 13 5 4 26.7 4.7 22.0 26.7 23.3 8.7 6.0 .7 2.0 12.0 8.7 3.3 2.7 156 100.0 11 7.1 1 .6 10 6.4 27 17.3 47 30.1 55 35.3 40 25.6 10 6.4 5 3.2 12 7.7 12 4 7.7 2.6 124 100.0 9 7.3 1 .8 8 6.5 24 19.4 37 29. 8 42 33. 9 29 23.4 8 6.5 5 4.0 9 7.3 9 3 7.3 2.4 32 100.0 25 100.0 ' Î 3 s 12 10 1 1 2 2 20 100.0 3 6 9 7 1 1 2 2 5 100.0 1 3 1 3 1 5 1 4 5 5 î 1 3 î 2 7 20 4 1 3 4 5 î i 6 7 1 2 2 3 10 13 11 2 27 i 2 3 3 1 1 3 î 2 MB ¡8 1 162 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . T able 75.— Em ploym ent before leaving school, by reason fo r leaving school and sesg children interviewed. Children who, before leaving school— Reason for leaving school and sex of child. A ll chil dren. D id not work. Worked. Number. Percent.1 Number. Percent.1 Both sexes......... 823 324 39.4 499 60.6 Economic reasons____ Other reasons................ Reasons not reported. 333 408 82 110 167 47 33.0 40.9 57.3 223 241 35 67.0 59.1 42.7 B o y s.................... 477 280 58.7 197 41.3 Economic reasons........ Other reasons................ Reasons not reported. 165 262 50 96 151 33 58.2 57.6 66.0 69 111 17 41.8 42.4 34.0 Girls..................... 346 44 12.7 302 87.3 Economic reasons........ Other reasons................ Reasons not reported. 168 146 32 14 16 14 8.3 11.0 154 130 18 91.7 89.0 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. SCHOOLTIME LOST. The children who worked before leaving school, although a larger, proportion of them than of those who did not work before leaving^ took their first regular positions during school term, were somewhat more likely to go straight from school to work without losing any important amount of schooltime in the transfer. Table 76 shows that 75.3 per cent of the children who worked, as compared with only 71.3 per cent of those who did not work, took their first regular positions during the school year. In spite of this only 26.9 per cent of the former group, as compared with 34.3 per cent of the latter, had intervals of one week or more of schooltime between leaving school and taking their first regular positions. Moreover, only 9.6 per cent of the children who had worked, as compared with 18.4 per cent of those who had not worked, lost one month or more of schooling at this time. This difference shows itself chiefly among the girls who had not worked, a larger proportion of whom than of the boys had intervals in many cases long intervals— between their school and their working lives. . Of the boys alone very nearly the same proportion of those who had worked as of those who had not worked— 27.1 per cent as compared with 28.4 per cent—lost one week or more of schooltime; but 9.7 per cent of those who had worked and 13.6 per https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 163 W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G S C H O O L. cent of those who had not worked lost one month or more of schoolrtime between leaving school and going to work. T able 76.— A m ou n t o f schooltime lost, by em ploym ent before leaving school and sex; children interviewed. Children who, before leaving school— Worked. D id not work. Interval between leaving school and going to work and sex. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion.1 tion. A ll children......................................................................................... 324 100.0 499 Interval during school term ....................................................................... None or less than 1 week (interval wholly or partly dining school term )......................................................................................... 1 week or more.......................................... ! ........................................... 1 week, under 1 m onth................................................................ 1 m onth, under 3 m onths........................................................... 3 months, under 6 m onths.......................................................... 6 months or over........................................................... ................. Interval entirely during vacation.. . ; .......................................... ......... 244 75.3 2 356 71.3 157 87 56 21 9 1 80 48.5 26.9 17.3 6 .5 2.8 .3 24.7 184 171 79 56 19 17 143 36.9 . 34.3 15.8 11.2 3.8 3.4 28.7 B oys........................................................................................................ 280 100.0 197 100.0 Interval during school term ...................................................................... None or less than 1 week (interval wholly or partly during school term ).......................................................................................... 1 week or more........................................................................................ 1 week, under 1 m onth................................................................ 1 m onth, under 3 m onths........................................................... 3 m onths, under 6 m onths......................................................... 6 months or over............................................................................ Interval entirely during vacation............................................................ 213 76.1 2 142 72.1 137 76 49 19 7 1 67 48.9 27.1 17.5 6 .8 2.5 .4 23.9 85 56 29 19 3 5 55 43.1 28.4 14.7 9.6 1.5 2.5 27.9 44 100.0 302 100.0 100.0 31 214 70.9 20 11 7 2 2 99 115 50 37 16 12 88 -32. 8 38.1 16.6 12.3 5.3 4 .0 29.1 None or less than 1 week (interval wholly or partly during Interval entirely during vacation...................................................... ..... 13 1 N o t shown where base is less than 50. » Including one boy for whom amount of schooltime lost was not reported. GRADE COMPLETED AND RETARDATION. On the subject of the grade the child had completed when he left school for work, information is available not only for the inter viewed children, but also for all the children who took out certifi cates for regular or for vacation work. In Table 77 the vacation and regular workers of the Boston certificate group and the children of the interviewed group who worked and who did not work before leaving school are compared as to this point. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 164 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, T a b l e 77.— Grade completed and sex; comparison o f vacation and regular workers issued ) certificates in B oston and regular workers interviewed who worked and did not work^ before leaving school. Children issued certificates in Boston, who, before becoming 16, worked— Grade completed or kind of school last attended and sex of child. During vacation or out of school hours. N um ber. Regularly. Per cent N um distriber. bution. Both sexes.................... 857 100.0 Elementary grades........ . Fourth grade................... Fifth grade............... .. Sixth grade....................... Seventh grade................. Eighth grade.................... Prevocational.................. Special................................ High school grades................ First year................ ......... Second year...................... Third and fourth years. Vocational schools........... .. Disciplinary schools.............. Other schools........................... Not reported............................ 415 13 26 56 93 214 4 411 216 143 52 22 1 4 4 48.4 1.5 3.0 6 .5 10.9 25.0 1.1 .5 48.0 25.2 16.7 6.1 2.6 .1 .5 .5 B o y s................................ 519 Elementary grades................ Fourth grade................... Fifth grade....................... Sixth grade....................... Seventh grade................. Eighth grade.................... Prevocational.................. Special................................ High school grades................ First year.......................... Second year...................... Third and fourth years. Vocational schools................. Disciplinary schools.............. Other schools........................... Not reported...................... Children interviewed who left school to work before becoming 16, and who, before leaving school1— Worked. D id not work. Per Per Per N um cent N um cent cent distriber. distriber. distribution. button.2 bution.2 100.0 324 100.0 499 100.0 2,907 • 82.0 153 4.3 304 8.6 592 16.7 528 14.9 1,267 35.8 41 1.2 22 .6 488 13.8 379 10.7 103 2.9 6 J2 111 3 1 11 .3 21 .6 6 .2 294 12 50 56 55 121 90.7 3.7 15.4 17.3 17.0 37.3 »454 24 41 104 92 192 91.0 4.8 8.2 20.8 18.4 38.5 29 27 2 9 .0 8.3 .6 36 34 2 7.2 6.8 .4 1 .3 9 1.8 100.0 2,114 100.0 280 100.0 197 100.0 243 4 15 33 60 125 5 1 260 139 92 29 9 1 2 4 46.8 .8 2.9 6.4 11.6 24.1 1.0 .2 50.1 26.8 17.7 5.6 1.7 .2 81.0 3.9 8.4 16.4 15.4 34.5 1.9 .4 16.2 12.5 3.5 .2 1.3 .5 .8 .2 256 9 43 48 48 108 91.4 3.2 15.4 17.1 17.1 38.6 169 6 10 43 36 74 85.8 3 .0 5.1 21.8 18.3 37.6 23 22 1 8.2 7.9 .4 22 20 2 11.2 10.2 1.0 .8 1,712 82 178 347 326 730 40 9 343 264 74 5 27 11 16 5 1 .4 6 3 .0 Girls........ ..... ................. 338 100.0 1,430 100.0 44 100.0 302 100.0 Elementary grades................ Fourth grade................... Fifth grade....................... Sixth grade....................... Seventh grade................. Eighth grade................... Prevocational.................. Special............................... High school grades................ First year.......................... Second year..................... Third and fourth years. Vocational schools................. Other schools........................... Not reported............................ 172 9 11 23 33 89 4. 3 151 77 1,195 71 126 245 202 537 1 13 145 115 29 1 84 5 1 83.6 5. 0 8. 8 17.1 14.1 37. 6 .1 .9 10.1 8.0 2.0 .1 5.9 .3 .1 38 3 7 8 7 13 » 285 18 31 61 56 118 94.4 6 .0 10.3 20.2 18.5 39.1 6 5 1 14 14 4 .6 4.6 3 1.0' 23 13 2 50. 9 2. 7 3.3 6. 8 9.8 26 3 1.2 Q 44.7 22.8 15 1 6 8 3 8 .6 3,544 i Prevocational, special, vocational, disciplinary, and other schools are not separately entered for the children interviewed. * Not shown where base is less than 50. * Including 1 girl under the fourth grade. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SCH OO L. 165 jfv Qf the children who took out certificates before their sixteenth ^birthdays for work only during vacation or out of school hours, a much larger proportion had completed high-school grades than of those who took out certificates for regular work. Of the vacation workers nearly half, 48 per cent, but of the regular workers little over one-eighth, 13.8 per cent, came from the high schools. Onefourth, 25.2 per cent, of the vacation workers as compared with one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, of the regular workers, came from the first year of high school; 16.7 per cent as compared with 2.9 per cent of the regular workers, came from the second year; and 6.1 per cent, as compared with 6.2 per cent of the regular workers, had completed the third or fourth years. Children who had completed the eighth or a higher grade constituted nearly three-fourths, 73 per cent, of the vacation workers and only about one-half, 49.6 per cent, of the regular workers. A larger proportion of both the boys and girls who were vacation workers than of those who were regular workers came from high schools or had completed the grammar school course. In both groups, however, a smaller proportion of the girls than of the boys came from these higher grades. Of the girls who worked only during vacation or outside school hours 71 per cent, as compared with ✓ 74.2 per cent of the boys, had completed the eighth grade or one or more years of high-school work. But of the girls who took out certificates for regular positions only 47.7 per cent, and of the boys 50.7 per cent, were thus far advanced in their school work. These differences in school standing do not necessarily indicate, however, that the vacation workers, actually were farther advanced for their ages than were the regular workers. Not only did a smaller proportion of the vacation workers come from the nativity groups— the foreign-born in general and notably the Italian— in which the proportion of children from the lower grades was particularly high, but the vacation workers, as already shown,66 were on an average considerably older than the regular workers, half of them being over 15£ years of age when they took out their first certificates. This fact alone might appear to account for all the differences in grades completed between the two groups. That these differences in age do not, by any means, however, account for the differences in grade completed is shown in Table 78, for there it appears that not far from one-third, 31.7 per cent, of all the children who before their sixteenth birthdays worked only during acation or out of school hours, as compared with less than one-tenth, .4 per cent, of those who took regular positions, had completed higher grades than normal for their ages. It should be noted that for more than one in ten, 10.9 per cent, of regular workers but for little more 66 See Table 67, p . 153. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 166 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . than one in a hundred, 1.1 per cent, of vacation workers the schoui J only and not the grade attained was reported, so that the degree o f v retardation could not be accurately measured. But even if all the children for whom the exact grade was not reported had come from higher grades than normal for their ages, the children who worked only during vacation or out of school hours would still have had a decided advantage in the matter of advancement in school. Moreover, only one-sixth, 16.6 per cent, of these vacation workers, as compared with not far from one-third, 31.5 per cent, of the regular workers, were retarded. Although the differences between the sexes were slight, a somewhat larger proportion of the girls than of the boys who worked only during vacation or out of school hours were retarded. T a b l e 7 8 .— Retardation and sex; comparison o f vacation and regular workers issued certificates in B oston and regular workers interviewed who worked and did not work before leaving school. Children issued certificates in Boston, who, before becoming 16, worked— Retardation and sex. During vacation or out of school hours only. A ll children.......................................... B o y s . . . ........................................... H aving completed: A higher grade than norm al.......... A normal grade................................... A lower grade than normal............ One or two grades lower than norm al....................................... Three or more grades lower than norm al........................... . N ot reported2...................................... Girls.................................................... Worked. D id not work. Per Num cent distri ber. bution.1 Per cent distri bution. 100.0 499 100.0 43 163 117 13.3 50.3 36.1 93 246 150 18.6 49.3 30.1 25.5 105 32.4 128 25.7 6 .0 10.9 12 1 3.7 .3 22 10 4.4 2 .0 2,114 100.0 280 100.0 197 100.0 32.2 50.5 16.0 208 967 663 9 .8 45.7 31.4 41 141 97 14.6 50.4 34.6 41 97 52 20.8 49.2 26.4 69 13.3 548 25.9 88 31.4 47 23.9 14 7 2.7 1.3 115 276 5.4 13.1 9 1 3.2 .4 5 ,7 2.5 .3 .6 338. 100.0 1,430 100.0 44 100.0 302 100.0 105 172 59 Mi 9 31.1 17.5 126 739 454 8.8 51.7 31.7 2 22 20 - 52 149 98 17.2 49.3 32.fi 43 12.7 357 25.0 17 81 26. jj 16 2 4.7 .6 97 111 6.8 7.8 3 17 3 5 .6 1.0 Per cent distri bution. Num ber. Per cent distri bution. 857 100.0 3,544 100.0 324 272 434 142 31.7 50.6 16.6 334 1,706 1,117 9.4 48.1 31.5 112 13.1 905 30 9 3.5 1.1 212 387 519 100.0 167 262 83 Num ber. Having completed: A higher grade than normal.......... A normal”grades................................ A lower grade than normal............ O ne or two grades lower than norm al....................................... Three or more grades lower than norm al............................. N ot reported2...................................... Regularly. Children interviewed who left school to work before becoming 16, and who, before leaving school— Num ber. H aving completed: One or tw o grades lower than Three or more grades lower 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. 2 “ N ot reported” means that the children came from disciplinary, prevocational, and other special .schools and that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SC H O O L. 167 / ^The differences between these two groups of children in grade comtlpleted shown in Table 77 must therefore be due to an actual tendency. The fact that the group of vacation workers includes a smaller pro portion of foreign bom , and especially of Italian children, who tend more frequently than native children to be retarded, can not alter the conclusion that the children who worked only during vacation and out of school hours tended much more frequently than did those who left school for work before their sixteenth birthdays to come from higher grades than normal for their ages. Conversely, it can not alter the conclusion that the regular workers tended much more frequently than the vacation workers to be retarded in their school work. The children who were interviewed, whether or not they had worked before leaving school, had all left school for work before they became 16 and most of them soon after becoming 14 years of age. These children, therefore, were all regular workers, and consequently in their school advancement they did not differ greatly from the entire group of children who took regular positions before their sixteenth birthdays except that, as they were on an average younger, fewer of them came from high school. The vacation work reported by these children, moreover, was in the Agreat majority of cases begun, if not completed, before they became >14 years of age, and generally without taking out employment cer tificates. The vacation workers of the schedule series constituted, therefore, a group of children who not only had definitely entered the industrial world before their sixteenth birthdays— most of them soon after their fourteenth birthdays— but had been irregularly employed out of school hours before they definitely entered, and the great majority of them before they were of legal age definitely to enter the ranks of industrial workers. From Table 77, relating to grade completed, it is hardly possible to show that work before leaving school had any definite effect on the school standing of the children who took regular positions before they were 16 years of age. Nearly one-fifth, 19.1 per cent, of those who had worked, as compared with little more than one-eighth, 13 per cent, of those who had not worked, came from the fourth or fifth grades. But on the other hand, 9 per cent of those who had worked, as compared with only 7.2 per cent of those who had not worked, had completed one or more years in high-school study. This difference, however, might be entirely accounted for by the smaller proportion of foreign born, and especially Italian children, in the group of vacation workers, "hat it is at least in part so accounted for appears to be shown by the „ct that it occurred entirely among the girls, who were on an average older than the boys when they left school for work, and among whom were an abnormally large proportion of Italians, who tend normally, as already indicated, to leave school for work as soon as they can https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 168 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE B O STO N . secure certificates rather than to work before leaving school. Among \ the boys, in fact, a smaller proportion of those who had worked than^l of those who had not worked came from high-school grades. When Table 78 is considered, however, it appears definitely that a larger proportion of the interviewed children who had worked than of those who had not worked before leaving school came from lower grades and a smaller proportion from higher grades than normal for their ages.67 Of the children who had worked, 36.1 percent and of those who had not worked only 30.1 per cent were retarded. On the other hand, of the children who had worked only 13.3 per cent, but of those who had not worked 18.6 per cent, had completed when they left school higher grades than normal for their ages. Upon the whole, the kind of work done before leaving school by the children who were interviewed appears to have had a disastrous effect on their school standing. Much of this work, and that which was apparently the most harm ful, was at least begun during school term. Among the children who had worked before leaving school a decidedly larger proportion, accord ing to Table 79, of those whose first school positions were for work during school term and at no other time had completed only the sixth or a lower grade than of those whose first positions were of any other kind., Not far from one-half, 46 per cent, of the children of the former groupl had not completed any grade higher than the sixth. Moreover, the proportion of children from the sixth or a lower grade whose first school positions were for work during both school term and vacation was higher than that of children whose first positions were for work during vacation only— 31.1 per cent as compared with 26.8 per cent. A much larger proportion of the children whose first school positions were held during vacation only than of any other group came from High school, 14.1 per cent as compared with 8.3 per cent of those who had worked during both vacation and school term, and with 7.1 per cent of those who had worked only during school term. These figures relate, of course, only to first school positions, but since two-thirds of these children held only one such position the conclusion to which they point is probably not affected by this fact. Evidently for some reason the children whose first positions were held during school term were more likely than those whose first positions were held only during vacation to have completed only the sixth or a lower grade when they finally left school. Most of these children doubtless were retarded. si A s explained on p . 127, the difference between the certificate and schedule groups in the proportions Qf children from higher grades than normal can not be considered of any special significance because it is probably caused, in part at least, b y the large proportion in the certificate group for whom only the schoq» and not the grade was reported and for whom, therefore, retardation could not be determined, x. e , waSt “ not reported.” https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis W O R K BEFORE L E A V IN G SCH O O L. ^T a b l e 79. i 169 Grade completed, by hind o ffirst school position, and sex; interviewed children who worked before leaving school. Children who on leaving school had completed specified grade. K ind of first school position and sex of child. • All chil dren. Sixth or lower. N um ber. Both sexes........................................ Vacation on ly ................................... Vacation and school term ................ Out of school hours................ During school hours................... School term ............................. Saturday only...................... Before and after school.................... Saturday and before and after school.......... During school hours......................... N ot reported......................................... B o y s ............................................... Vacation o n ly ................................... Vacation and school term............ Out of school hours............ .......... During school hours......................... School term ................................... , Saturday only.............................. Before and after school................ V - Saturday and before and after school........ y iot reported................................................... Girls............................................................ Vacation on ly ...................................... Vacation and school term.......................... Out of school hours.................................. During school hours....................... School term.............................. Saturday only....................... Before and after school....................... Saturday and before and after school......... During school hours..................... Not reported....................................... Seventh or eighth. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 High school I or I I . N um ber. Per cent.1 *324 118 36.4 176 54.3 29 9.0 *71 132 129 3 113 36 20 54 3 8 19 41 41 26.8 31.1 31.8 57.7 60.6 61.2 46.0 51.9 10 11 9 2 8 2 3 3 ÏÏTÏ 8.3 7.0 52 20 9 23 41 80 79 1 53 14 8 28 3 2 55.7 23 8.2 42.6 6 *280 100 »41 128 126 2 105 35 18 52 6 7 39 39 50 20 8 22 4 35.7 30.5 31.0 47.6 42.3 156 27 79 78 1 48 14 7 27 2 46.9 61.7 61.9 45.7 51.9 6 10 9 1 7 1 3 3 . 44 18 20 6 30 4 3 1 8 1 2 2 3 2 12 2 2 14 1 1 4 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 7.1 5.6 7.8 7.1 6.7 5.8 2 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. 3 Including one boy whose grade was not reported. That work during school term tends distinctly to cause a child to fall behind in his school work is even more clearly indicated by the figures, in Table 80 than by those in Table 79. For in Table 80 each child’s actual age at leaving school is compared with the grade which he had completed at that time. Of the children whose first positions were held only during school term 45.1 per cent were re tarded, as compared with 31.1 per cent of those whose first positions were held during both school term and vacation and with 28.2 per cent of those whose first positions were held during vacation only, n the other hand, of the children whose first positions were solely /ring vacation a larger proportion than of any other group were from normal grades, and of those whose first positions were during both vacation and school term a larger proportion had completed higher grades than normal for their ages. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 12 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 170 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . T a b l e 80.— Retardation, by kind o f position first held before leaving school, and s& Q interviewed children who worked before leaving school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed for their ages— A lower grade than normal. K ind of first school position and sex. A higher grade than AU normal. chil dren. A normal grade. Total. Three or One or two more grades grades lower than lower than normal. normal. Num Per Num Per Num Per N um Per Num Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent .1 ber. cent. 1 13.3 163 50.3 9~ 12.7 23 17.4 22 17.1 41 57.7 51.5 51.2 43 Both sexes................................. 2 324 71 132 129 3 113 36 2 1 10 20 54 3 4 8 1 ÏT B o y s............................................. 2 280 . - fioforo and after school Saturday and before and after N ot reported......................................... Girls............................................. 1 Vucdliuii and school term» Satui day only................ ............. lW t ho and after school. . . •••• Saturday and before and after 52 14 8 .8 3 3 Saturday and before and after Not reported................................. .. 68 66 2 29 41 128 126 2 23 22 1 9 105 35 18 4 6 1 53.7 18.0 17.5 4.2 3.0 3.1 51 19 9 45.1 47 19 41.6 4 3.5 21 2 38.9 18 4 88 5.6 1 31.4 9~ Ä2 8 51.6 51.6 39 39 30.5 31.0 35 35 27.3 27.8 4 4 3,-tf 44.8 43 19 7 41.0 4 3. S' 38.5 17 32.7 3 1 8 .6 49 14 7 46.7 47 19 7.7 28 53.8 20 8 3 2 1 17 3 9 3 2~ 22~ 20* 1 17 12 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 i 1 2 44~ 1 3 33.3 2 30 4 3 1 8 1 1 8 8 66 3 1 \ N ot shown where base is less than 50. , , , * Tnpinding one boy, whose age on leaving school was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 3.7 3 4 4 ÔT 34.6 50.4 65 2 1 12 23.9 28.0 28.7 5 24 2 3 1 52 46.0 141 14.6 32.4 17 37 37 41 41 1 2 8 105 28.2 31.1 31.8 2 <r 8 7.4 36.1 117 1; 5.8 i INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. When a child has finally left school to go to work he has started upon a real industrial career the first phase of which ends upon his sixteenth birthday when the restrictions of the law are in large part removed. The occupations which he enters during this period will be considered later, but certain other general facts in regard to his industrial history are important. In the first place how does he secure his first and later positions ? Is he guided upon the threshold of industrial life by the advice and assistance of officials of the school which he is leaving or of the department which enforces the childlabor law under the authority of which he is placing himself ? Or is he left without guidance from any public source ? It is also important to know how many positions he holds during this period, during what proportion of the time he is unemployed, what wages he receives when he begins work and what wage increases 'he secures. From one point of view, however, his industrial success ¡pan best be measured by his average monthly earnings in all positions ^and through all periods of employment and unemployment. These average monthly earnings give an idea of the monetary value to himself or his family of the labor of a child under 16 years of age. Finally, it is very important, especially from the point of view of health, to know the hours which he works, and especially from the educational and industrial points of view, to know the reasons for his changes in positions. METHODS OF SECURING POSITIONS. The great majority of child workers in Boston appear to have secured their positions either independently or through friends or relatives. Table 81 shows that at least three-fourths of the children studied secured their first positions in one of these two ways. Of those for whom continuation school records were used the proportion was 76 per cent and of those who were interviewed it was 87.7 per cent. A smaller proportion of the interviewed children than of the continua tion-school children, 38.4 per cent as compared with 40.2 per cent, secured their first positions independently, and a considerably larger proportion, 49.3 per cent as compared with 35.8 per cent, secured hem through friends or relatives. The latter difference may be due •i part to the fact that about one-tenth, 10.6 per cent, of the continua tion-school children failed to report how they secured their first posi tions. But the smaller proportion of interviewed children who se cured their first positions independently must show a real difference 171 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 172 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . between the two groups which is due, probably, to the fact that th e j interviewed children were on an average younger than the continua-V tion-school children when they began work. Little use appears to have been made of employment agencies or of schools or placement bureaus in securing first positions, and few children were offered positions. Only about one child in twenty, 5.4 per cent of the continuation-school group and 5.1 per cent of the schedule group, secured their first positions through a State or other employment agency or philanthropic organization. An even smaller proportion, 3.9 per cent of the continuation-school group and 1.7 per cent of the schedule group, were assisted by a school or a place ment bureau. Of the continuation-school group 4 per cent and of the schedule group 4.6 per cent were offered employment. T a b l e 81.— Method o f securing first position, by sex; comparison o f children interviewed with children in B oston continuation school. Children in B oth sexes. Boston school. continuation B oth sexes. Girls. B oys. Children interviewed (Boston). Girls. Boys. Method of securing first position. N um ber. 3,399 T otal......................... .. Position secured through— Friend or relative.......... 1,217 555 547 Friend. . .................. Relative..................... Employer is rela tiv e.......................... Per P e r -^ l Per Per 1 Per Per cent N um cent Num cent Num cent Num ce n t? cent Num dis- < . dis dis dis- 1 disdis ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. tributribu tribu tribuiributribu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. 100.0 2,026 100.0 1,373 100.0 35.8 16.3 16.1 738 325 330 823 100.0 477 100.0 346 100.0 36.4 479 34.9 406 49.3 212 44.4 194 56.1 16.0 16.3 230 217 16.8 15.8 183 160 22.2 19.4 84 83 17.6 17.4 99 77 28.6 22.3 115 3.4 83 4.1 32 2.3 63 7.7 45 9 .4 18 5.2 Independently secured. 1,367 40.2 735 36.3 632 46.0 316 38.4 186 39.0 130 37.6 Applied personally 1,296 A n sw er«! adver 65 tisement ............... W orked there be 6 fore......................... 38.1 698 34.5 598 43.6 234 28.4 -140 29.4 94 27.2 1.9 31 1.5 34 2.5 44 5:3 16 3.4 28 8.1 .2 6 .3 38 4.6 30 6.3 8 2.3 Em ploym ent offered. . 136 4.0 104 5.1 32 2.3 38 4 .6 31 6 .5 7 2 .0 Em ploym ent agency, etc........................... 184 5.4 171 8.4 13 .9 42 5.1 37 7.8 5 1.4 State employment office...................... Private employ m ent agency-----Philanthropic or ganization. 27 1 .3 4 .3 138 4.1 132 6 .5 6 .4 38 4.6 34 7.1 4 1.2 15 .4 12 .6 3 .2 4 .5 3 .6 1 .3 School, or placement bureau— 132 3.9 75 3.7 57 4.2 14 1.7 6 1.3 8 2*-L 1/4 .6 D ay sch ool.. 0| 1 Other m ethods.. Method not reported. . . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2.1 71 7 J2, 54 - 1.6 42 2 31 2.1 .1 1.5 ¿i 10.6 3 200 .1 9 .9 360 29 5 23 2.1 .4 1.7 3 i -4 1 .1 10 1 1.2 1 .2 5 1.0 2 1 5 5 1.0 2 I 160 11.7 7 .9 IN D U STR IAL, H ISTO R IE S. 173 . Each public school in Boston had at the time of this study a voca t i o n a l counselor whose function was, not to secure positions, but to furnish advice to children who were leaving school for work. These counselors, who were usually teachers in the upper grades giving only part time to this work, also sometimes placed children in positions which they considered comparatively desirable. Special types of schools such as disciplinary, prevocational and vocational, frequently secured positions for their pupils. That day schools in general were more likely, however, to secure positions for, and prob ably also to be consulted by, the older children than the younger ones appears to be indicated by the fact that they secured first positions for 2.1 per cent of the continuation-school children but for only 0.4 per cent of the interviewed children. Evidently, as would be ex pected, their influence over the actual placement of children in industry was slight. An agency especially designed for the placement of children existed, however, in the placement bureau which had an office adjoining the Boston certificate office. The work of this bureau was mainly among high-school graduates and children over 16 years of age who were applying for educational certificates. That it had compara t iv e ly little to do with securing positions for the children included in /this study is shown by the fact that it placed in their first positions only 1.6 per cent of the children for whom continuation-school records were used, 54 children out of 3,399. The State employment office secured first positions for only 31 of these children, 27 of them boys. Less than one-tenth, 9.3 per cent, of the continuation-school chil dren and an even smaller proportion, 6.8 per cent, of the interviewed children secured their first positions through any sort of agency or bureau organized for the purpose of securing employment. Of those who did make use of such an agency, more than half, 4.1 per cent of the continuation-school children and 4.6 per cent of the interviewed children, were placed by private employment agencies. Most of the children placed by these agencies, as well as of those placed by the State employment office, were boys. In the continuation-school group a larger proportion of girls than of boys secured their positions independently, 46 per cent as com pared with 36.3 per cent, but in the group of children interviewed the tendency of the two sexes was exactly reversed and a somewhat larger proportion of boys secured their positions independently. On Ite other hand, in the continuation-school group a smaller propor tion of girls than of boys, 34.9 per cent as compared with 36.4 per cent, secured their first positions through friends or relatives, and this also was reversed among the interviewed children. In the latter group 56.1 per cent of the girls and 44.4 per cent of the boys were https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 174 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, assisted by friends or relatives. In general it appears that the girlsj were even more likely than the boys to apply personally for positioner but that there was more difference in timidity between the younger' and older girls than between the younger and older boys. T a b l e 82.— Method o f securihg first and second positions, by sex; children in B oston con tinuation school who held two or more positions. Children who held two or more positions. B oth sexes. Method of securing position. Girls. Boys. First posi Second posi First posi Second posi First posi Second posi tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. Per Per Per Per Per Per cent cent cent cent cent cent N um N um N um N um N um N um distri distri distri distri distri ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. distri ber. bu bu bu bu bu bu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. T o ta l............................... 1,908 100.0 1,908 100.0 1,101 100.0 1,101 100.0 807 100.0 807 100.0 Position secured through— Friend or relative........... 567 29.7 507 26.6 338 30.7 287 26.1 229 28.4 220 27.3 Friend........................ Relative..................... Employer relative.. 248 271 48 13.0 14.2 2.5 288 194 25 15.1 10.2 1.3 148 161 29 13.4 14.6 2 .6 155 111 21 14.1 10.1 1 .9 100 110 19 12.4 13.6 2 .4 133 83 4 16.5 10.3 .5" ■■ —J Independently secured. 793 41.6 882 46.2 416 ~3778 467 42.4 377 46.7 415 Applied personally. Answered advertisem ent................. Worked there before 747 39.2 832 43.6 392 35.6 446 40.5 355 44.0 386 47.8" 41 5 2.1 .3 48 2 2.5 .1 19 5 1.7 .5 19 2 1.7 .2 22 2.7 29 3 .6 Employment offered. . . 82 4 .3 67 3 .5 61 5.5 42 3 .8 21 2.6 25 3.1 Em ploym ent agency, school, placement bureau, etc.......................... 155 8.1 292 15.3 116 10.5 203 18.4 39 4.8 89 11.0 14 .7 32 1.7 12 1.1 26 2.4 2 .2 6 .7 61 3 .2 80 4.2 61 5.5 71 6.4 9 1.1 Philanthropic organization.............. D ay school................ Continuation school Placement bureau.. 5 44 3 28 .3 2.3 .2 1.5 5 47 84 44 .3 2.5 4.4 2 .3 3 28 1 11 .3 2.5 .1 1.0 4 32 42 28 .4 2 .9 3 .8 2.5 2 16 2 17 .2 2 .0 .2 2.1 1 15 42 16 .1 1.9 5.2 2 .0 Method not reported... 311 16.3 160 8.4 170 15.4 102 9.3 141 17.5 58 7.2 State employment office........................ Private employ- A larger proportion of the children secured their second positions independently than their first67®and a smaller proportion secured their seeond positions through relatives. Table 82 shows that of the continuation-school children who held more than one position 46.2 per cent secured their second positions independently, as compared with only 41.6 per cent who secured their first positions in this way. Although a slightly larger proportion secured their second positioi 67a Based on total cases. I f not reported cases are equally divided among the different positions, then the proportion securing their second positions independently was about the same as the proportion securing their first positions independently. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. 175 .b y answering advertisements, the difference was due almost entirely \ o the larger proportion who applied personally, 43.6 per cent as compared with 39.2 per cent. This table also shows that only 26.6 per cent of the second positions, as compared with 29.7 per cent of the first positions, were secured through relatives and friends. Here the difference was due entirely to the smaller proportion of cases in which the second position was secured through a relative or in which the second employer was a relative. Only 10.2 per cent of the children who held more than one position secured their second positions through relatives, as compared with a percentage of 14.2 for their first positions. And only 25, or 1.3 per cent of these children, worked for relatives in their second positions, as compared with 48, or 2.5 per cent, in their first positions.68 On the other hand, a larger pro portion,-15.1 per cent, as compared with 13 per cent, secured their second positions through friends. Both the boys and the girls showed this greater tendency to secure their second than their first positions through friends or by personal application. With the background of experience secured in their first positions many children evidently had greater confidence and initiative, which 4ed them to branch out for themselves and secure their second posi tions by personal application. In this they were doubtless often ^assisted by information secured through all sorts of channels opened up to them through their previous work, including their new asso ciates. The influence of these new associates is shown also in the number of children who secured their second positions through friends instead of relatives. Many children who secured their positions by personal application doubtless heard of the vacancies through asso ciates. These children showed a decidedly greater tendency to make use of agencies and bureaus designed for placement in securing their second than they had in securing their first positions. Nearly twice as many of them, 292, or 15.3 per cent, as compared with 155, or 8.1 per cent, secured their second positions through employment agencies or schools or placement bureaus. A larger proportion used each different type of such agency, except the philanthropic organization, for second than for first positions; even the day school secured more second than first positions for children who held more than one. The placement bureau, which found first positions for only 28, or 1.5 per cent of these children, found second positions for 44, or 2.3 per cent of them. The greatest difference was found, as was natural, in the use ade of the placement facilities of the continuation school. Voca« In all the regular positions held b y the children interviewed the employers were parents or relatives in 84 cases involving 78 children. 58 boys and 20 girls. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 176 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . tional guidance or vocational counseling was a prominent feature o f j the work of the continuation school and, although this function dic^J not include specifically the placement of children, it naturally led to such placement, especially as the teachers’ visits to the establish ments where children were at work began to make employers realize the aid which the schools could give them. Employers at the time of this study were gradually learning to send to the continuation school for boys and girls, especially to fill positions requiring some technical or vocational training. Before securing their first positions children, as a rule, had no contact with the continuation school, since they were enrolled only after they had brought their promises of employment and secured their first certificates. Only three of them, or 0.2 per cent, therefore, secured their first positions through the continuation school, as compared with 84, or 4.4 per cent, who secured their second positions through this agency. This latter proportion, moreover, must not be considered typical of the work of the continuation school in this respect as it represents only such placement as could be carried on during the early history of the school when the energies of its staff were occupied mainly in the pioneer task of organization and no systematic placement work had been developed. A larger proportion of the foreign born than of the native children^ included in the continuation school group, according to Table 83, secured their first positions independently or through relatives or were employed by relatives, and a smaller proportion made use of employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus. Of the foreignborn children 43 per cent, as compared with 39.6 per cent of the native children, secured their positions independently; 17.1 per cent, as compared with 15.9 per cent of the native children, secured their positions through relatives; and 5.8 per cent, as compared with 2.8 per cent of the native children, were employed by relatives. On the other hand not much more than 1 in 20, 6.4 per cent, of the foreignborn children, but 1 in 10, 10 per cent, of the native children secured their first positions through employment agencies, schools, or place ment bureaus. In regard to methods of securing first positions the general tendency of foreign-born children who had been in the United States for 10 years or more was most like, and that of those who had been here for less than 5 years differed most from, that of native children. Practically one-half, 49.7 per cent, of the children who had been in this country less than 5 years secured their first positions independently; ove one-fifth, 21.6 per cent, secured their-first positions through relative less than one-tenth, 9.8 per cent, through friends; and only 1 in 50, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 177 IN D U S T R IA L HISTORIES, 2 per cent, through employment agencies, schools, or placement 'bureaus. A larger proportion of the foreign-born children who had been here from 5 to 10 years, 7.1 per cent, than of any other group were first employed by their relatives. T a b l e 83.— Method o f securing first position, by nativity and length o f residence in the United States; children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Foreign born. Living in United States specified number of years. Native. Method of securing first position. Total. Under 5. 5 under 10. 10 years and over. Not reported. Per Per Per Per Per Per N um cent N um cent Num cent N um cent N um cent N um cent distri distri distri distri distri distri ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. bu bu bu bu bu bu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. T o ta l............................... 2,761 100.0 637 100.0 153 100.0 224 100.0 203 100.0 Positions secured through— Friend or relative .1 ___ 990 35.9 227 35.6 55 35.9 79 35.3 80 Friend........................ R elative..................... Employer relative.. 474 438 78 17.2 81 15.9 109 2.8 ' 37 12.7 17.1 5.8 15 33 7 9.8 21.6 4.6 28 35 16 12.5 15.6 7.1 34 33 13 57 100.0 39.4 13 22.8 16.7 16.3 6 .4 4 8 1 7.0 14.0 1.8 Independently secured. 1,092 39.6 274 43.0 76 49.7 96 42.9 84 41.4 18 31.6 Applied personally. 1,035 Answered adver tisement ................. 51 Worked there before 6 37.5 260 40.8 68 44.4 94 42.0 80 39.4 18 31.6 1.8 .2 14 2.2 8 5.2 2 .9 4 2.0 Em ploym ent offered. . . ' 119 4.3 vT 2.7 5 3 .3 4 1.8 7 3.4 1 1.8 Em ploym ent agency, school, placement bureau, etc.................... 275 10.0 41 6.4 3 2.0 18 8.0 14 6.9 6 10.5 1 .4 2 1.0 1 .7 7 3.1 6 3.0 3 5.3 .4 2.7 .9 .4 12.1 State employment office........................ Private employ m ent agency......... Philanthropic or ganization.............. D ay school................ Continuation school Placement bureau.. 28 1.0 3 .5 121 4.4 17 2.7 14 62 5 45 .5 2.2 .2 1.6 1 9 2 9 JJ 1.4 .3 1.4 2 1.3 1 6 2 1 A ll other methods.......... 3 .1 Method not reported. . . 282 10.2 78 12.2 14 9.2 27 3 1.5 3 1.5 3 5.3 18 8.9 ÏT 33.3 A much larger proportion of children who had completed a year or more of high school work than of any other group, as appears in Table 84, secured their first positions through employment agencies, schools, r placement bureaus. Not far from one-fifth, 18 per cent, of the hildren from high schools made use of these agencies, most of them securing their positions either through private employment agencies, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 178 T a b l e 84.— Method o f securing first position, by grade completed children in Boston continuation school. Children, before taking out first certificate, attending— Elementary school: Grade completed. N um ber. A ll children...................................... ................. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. 148 100.0 291 100.0 566 100.0 504 100.0 1,219 61 20 34 7 66 62 4 41.2 13.5 23.0 4.7 37.8 35.1 2 .7 103 40 50 13 121 115 5 1 18 35.4 13.7 17.2 4.5 41.6 39.5 1 .7 .3 6.2 198 76 92 30 238 222 15 1 21 35.0 13.4 16.3 5.3 42.0 39.2 2.7 .2 178 82 85 11 211 197 12 2 27 35.3 16.3 16.9 2.2 41.9 39.1 2.4 .4 5.4 448 224 190 34 495 477 16 2 40 7 2.4 4 1.4 6.0 .9 2.5 .7 .4 .5 1.1 29 3 16 5.8 .6 3.2 .3 .3 .3 34 5 14 4 2 3 6 14.4 75 13.3 117 13 59 7 3 2 33 1 118 Positions secured through— Em ploym ent N um ber. Eighth. Seventh. Sixth. Fifth. Fourth. 5 3.4 4 1 1 1 2.7 .7 .7 .7 agency, school, placement 1 .7 1 1 1 22 14.9 42 3 /T 2 .4 8 1 58 1.6 .2 11.5 Per cent distri bution. - N um ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 100.0 467 100.0 198 100.0 36.8 18.4 15.6 2.8 40.6 39.1 1.3 .2 3.3 168 83 70 15 169 157 12 36.0 17.8 15.0 3.2 36.2 33.6 2.6 59 28 26 5 75 74 1 29.8 14.1 13.1 2.5 37.9 37.4 .5 15 3.2 10 5.1 9.6 1. 1 4.8 .6 .2 .2 2.7 .1 9.7 84 8 37 2 32 1 4 1 30 18.0 1.7 7.9 .4 6.9 .2 .9 .2 6.4 39 1 6 19.7 •5 3.0 31 15.7 1 .5 15 7.6 1 Including special, disciplinary, prevocational, vocational, and other schools. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 5 >-?- T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON Method of securing first position. IN D U STR IAL. H ISTO R IE S. 179 7.9 per cent, or through their own schools, 6.9 per cent. Nearly one-tenth, 9.6 per cent, of the eighth-grade graduates, but little more than one-twentieth, 5.8 per cent, of the seventh-grade graduates, only 6 per cent of the sixth-grade graduates, and much smaller pro portions, 2.4 per cent and 2.7 per cent, respectively, of the fifth and fourth grade graduates, secured their first positions through such agencies. Few of the children from elementary as compared with those from high schools secured positions through their schools. This was probably due in part to a greater amount of attention to the placement of children in the high than in the elementary schools. It is difficult to determine whether this greater tendency of highschool pupils to use placement agencies, or whether the greater tendency previously noted of native children to use such agencies, is due to the comparatively large proportion of native children in the high schools. A large proportion, 23 per cent, of the children who had completed only the fourth grade secured their first positions through relatives. This was due in part, though not wholly, to the inclusion in this group of a comparatively large number of foreign-born children who, as already seen, tended to secure their positions in this way. rn part, the comparatively large proportion, 17.1 per cent, of the foreign-born children who secured positions in this way was due to the large proportion of these children who came from the lower grades in school. Children who had completed the fifth grade showed the next largest proportion, 17.2 per cent, who were placed by relatives. In general the children from the fourth, fifth, and sixth were more likely than those from any higher grade to go to work for their relatives, and ljess likely to secure positions through friends. In addition to the fact that a larger proportion of them were foreign born these children from the lower grades would be less likely than those from higher grades to have friends who had preceded them in leaving school for work. Table 85 shows that over two-fifths, 42.6 per cent, of the con tinuation-school children whose first employers were relatives were retarded, as compared with 31.4 per cent of the entire number. The girls whose employers were relatives were less frequently re tarded than the boys, of whom 45.8 per cent had failed to attain normal grades. Only a little over one-fourth, 27.9 per cent, of the children who secured their first positions through friends were retarded, and on this point little difference was found between the sexes. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 180 T a b l e 85.— Retardation, by method o f securing first position, and sex; children in B oston continuation school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages- A 1ower grade than norroal; Method of securing first position and sex. A ll children. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. Not reported.1 Three or more grades lower than normal. Number. Per cent. * Number. Per cent.2 Number. Per cent.2 Number. Per cent.2 Number. Per cent.2 Number. Per cent.2 Both sex e s...................................... 3,399 325 9.6 1,622 47.7 1,063 31.4 861 25.3 205 6.0 386 11.4 Positions secured through— Friend orrelative................................ Friend.................................... . . . " R elative........................ Employer relative.................... In d e p e n d e n tly secured................ Applied personally.................. Answered a d v ertisem en t... Worked there before................. Em ploym ent offered....................... Em ploym ent agency, etc............... State em p lo y m e n t office___ Private em p loy m en t agency Philanthropic organization.. School or placement bureau........ D a y school.................................. Continuation school................. P la c e m e n t bureau................. A ll other methods............................ . . Method not reported........................ 1,217 <555 547 115 1,367 1,296 65 6 136 184 31 138 15 132 71 7 54 3 360 117 58 51 8 113 106 7 9.6 10.5 9.3 7.0 8.3 8.2 10.8 48.4 51.5 45.9 45.2 49.7 50.0 43.1 76 27 44 5 92 84 7 1 8 6 1 4 1 3 2 6 .2 4.9 8.0 4.3 6.7 6.5 10.8 130 56 68 6 121 117 3 1 20 11 1 9 1 37 35 10.7 10.1 12.4 5.2 8.9 9 .0 4.6 15.2 8 14.8 64.8 16.7 305 128 133 44 362 341 20 1 43 36 7 25 4 19 8 3 8 25.1 23.1 24.3 38.3 26.5 26.3 30.8 7 .4 15.8 381 155 177 49 454 425 27 2 51 42 8 29 5 22 10 3 9 31.3 27.9 32.4 42.6 33.2 32.8 41.5 10 29 6 21 2 11 3 14.8 1 1.9 2 3.7 45 12.5 589 286 251 52 679 648 28 3 55 102 16 79 7 62 23 4 35 3 132 36.7 116 32.2 96 26.7 20 5.6 67 18.6 B o y s ........... ..............5 ....................... 2,026 202 10.0 917 45.3 632 31.2 522 25.8 110 5.4 275 13.6 Positions secured through— Friend, or relative............................... Friend............................................ Relative......................................... Em ployer relative.................... I n d e p e n d e n tly secured................. Applied personally................... Answered a d v e rtis e m e n t... W orked therie before................. 738 325 330 83 735 698 31 6 78 41 32 5 56 53 3 10.6 12.6 9 .7 6 .0 7 .6 7.6 339 155 150 34 343 328 12 3 45.9 47.7 45.5 41.0 46.7 47.0 228 91 99 38 261 244 15 2 30.9 28.0 30.0 45.8 35.5 35.0 184 75 76 33 216 202 13 1 24.9 23.1 23.0 39.8 29.4 28.9 44 16 23 5 45 42 2 1 6 .0 4.9 7.0 6.0 6.1 6.0 93 38 49 6 75 73 1 1 12.6 11.7 14.8 7.2 10.2 10.5 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 8.3 4.2 40.4 55.4 57.2 47.0 32.4 37.5' 22.8 21.0 16.7 14.1 31.6 19.6 18.1 14.4 11.3 5.9 3.3 2.9 2.3 2.8 • 14.7 6 .0 6.5 28.0 49.3 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON One or two grades lower than normal. Total. Vj 104 171 27 132 12 75 42 2 31 3 200 25 G irls....................................................... 1,373 Positions secured through— Friend or relative................................... Friend............................................... Relative............................................. Em ployer relative........................ In d ep en d en tly secured.................... Applied personally....................... Answered ad vertisem ent........ Em ploym ent offered............................ Em ploym ent agency, etc................... State em ploym ent office........... Private em ploym ent agency.. Philanthropic organization.... . School or placement Dureau............ D ay school.................................... Continuation school..................... Placement bureau....................... Method not reported.......................... 479 230 217 32 632 598 34 32 13 4 6 3 57 29 5 23 160 8 28 6 20 2 7 2 7.7 16.4 12.5 41 97 14 77 6 24 3 1 20 3 70 123 9.0 39 17 19 3 57 53 4 2 1 8,1 7.4 8.8 15.2 9.3 5 9.0 8.9 1 4 1 3 20 7.0 12.5 39.4 56.7 37 35 6 26 3 10 4 1 5 35.6 20.5 35.0 61 30.5 52 26.0 9 4.5 44 22.0 705 51.3 434 31.6 339 24.7 95 6.9 111 8.1 250 131 101 18 336 320 16 14 5 2 2 1 38 20 3 15 62 52.2 57.0 46.5 153 64 78 11 193 181 12 14 7 2 3 2 12 » 6 2 4 55 31.9 27.8 35.9 121 53 57 11 146 139 7 13 6 2 2 2 9 4 2 3 44 25.3 23.0 26.3 32 11 21 6.7 4.8 9.7 37 18 19 7.7 7.8 8.8 23.1 23.2 47 42 5 1 1 7.4 7.0 46 44 7.3 7.4 15.8 3 2 5.3 3 5.3 6.9 23 14.4 58.3 32.0 53.2 53.5 66.7 38.8 1 19.7 13.3 30.5 30.3 21.1 34.4 30 30 5 23 2 10 4 1 5 28.8 17.5 17.4 7 5 1 3 1 6.7 2.9 2.3 13.3 18 11 1 9 1 34 33 17.3 6.4 6.8 45.3 1 1 27.5 i ii t h e ' ^ ^ e ^ ^ p ^ e d ^ a s g i v w i . ^ 6 cMldren came irom disciPlinary» prevocational, vocational,and other special schools, and that on the records only the school attended, and not IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. Em ploym ent offered........................... Em ploym ent agency, etc................. State em ploym ent office_____ Private em ploym ent agency. Philanthropic organization__ School or placement bureau............ D ay school....................................... Cont inuation school.................... P la c e m e n t bureau..................... All other methods................................. Method not reported............................ 1 N ot shown where baseis less than 50. 181 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 182 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . This table shows also that comparatively few, only 22.8 per cent of the children who secured their first positions through employment agencies of all kinds and even fewer, 16.7 per cent, of those who secured them through schools or placement bureaus, were retarded. In the latter group— the children who secured positions through schools or placement bureaus— the grade completed by more than one-fourth, 28 per cent, was not given. The children for whom the grade was not given were from disciplinary, prevocational, vocational, and other special schools, most of which endeavored to place as many as possible of their pupils. Of the children who secured their first posi tions through the schools they were leaving, about one-half, 49.3 per cent, came from this type of school. Nearly all of them were boys. The children who secured their positions through private employ ment agencies and through the placement bureau seem to have been those who were advanced rather than retarded in their school work. Of the former group 15.2 per cent and of the latter 14.8 per cent, as compared with only 9.6 per cent of all the children, had completed higher grades than normal. Nearly three-fifths, 57.2 per cent, of the children who secured their first positions through private employ ment agencies and not far from two-thirds, 64.8 per cent, of those who secured them through the placement bureau, were in norma grades for their ages. . T a b l e 8 6 . — Method o f securing first regular position, by em ploym ent before leaving school, and sex; interviewed children who worked before leaving school. Children who, before leaving school— Worked. Method of securing first regular position. 100.0 100.0 140 F rien d .................................. . R ela tiv e............................... Employer relative............ Independently secured.......... 130 43.2 53.3 16.4 17.0 9.9 130 105 31 26.1 40.1 186 37.3 Applied personally........... Answered advertisement. Worked there before____ Em ploym ent agency___ P h ilan th rop ic organiza tion .................................... D ay school.......................... Continuation school........ Placement bureau............ Not reported.............................. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 280 100.0 118 Did not work. 21.0 6.2 113 29 27 6.5 1.2 1.2 17 40.4 22 7.9 24 8.6 3.4 .6 94 Worked- Did not work. 47.7 44 302 22 172 8.1 37.1 33.0 4.1 57.0 21.2 20.8 73 100.0 30.8 18.8 26.8 2 .9 10.7 6.6 7.1 42.1 197 100.0 16.8 15.0 10.4 30.7 Em ploym ent offered.............. Em ploym ent agency, school, placement bureau, etc......... Worked. Girls who, before leaving school— Per Per Per Per Per cent cent cent cent cent N um N um Num Num N um dis N um dis dis dis dis ber. ber. ber. ber. ber. tribu ber. tribu tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. tion. tion. T o t a l......................................... . Position secured through— Friend or relative...................... D id not work. B oys who. before leav ing school— 5.0 17 113 37.4 25 29.1 8.3 2.0 19 9.6 15 7.6 1.4 .5 1.1 1.0 3.3 .3 V . IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. 183 Among the interviewed children, according to Table 86, a larger proportion of those who worked than those who did not work before leaving school secured their first positions independently. But this difference was due entirely to the fact that more than one-tenth, 11.7 per cent, of the children who had worked before leaving school went back to places where they had been employed before. A larger pro portion of these children than of those who had not worked before leaving school, 7.1 per cent as compared with 3 per cent, were offered positions; and a larger proportion also, 6.5 per cent as compared with 3.4 per cent, secured their first positions through private employment agencies. NUMBER OF POSITIONS. The children who took out certificates before they were 16 years of age began their industrial histories at different ages, when barely 14, when nearly 16, and at all ages between. The number of certificates which a child held before his sixteenth birthday is not, therefore, an index to his relative steadiness or unsteadiness as a worker unless it is known also how long before that birthday, that is* at what age, he took out his first certificate. Even when this is known the records Wef the certificate office do not necessarily give the child’s complete ’ industrial history, for he may at some time between the ages of 14 and 16 have secured a certificate, or even more than one certificate, for work in some other city. A certain number of the children for whom records were secured may have moved from somewhere else to Boston or to one of the neighboring cities included in the study, and others may have moved away, between the ages of 14 and 16. These children may have worked in the city from which they came or to which they went. Still others must have died, and probably a few worked at some time without certificates. Both the certificate and continuation school records, therefore, furnish understatements of the number of positions held. The certificate records, moreover, in clude children who worked only during vacation and were in school all the rest of the year. Nevertheless, it is of interest to note the num ber of certificates issued to the children of these two groups who began work at the different ages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 184 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . T a b l e 87. — Number o f certificated positions held, by age at taking out first certificate and sex; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Num ber of certificated positions held and age at taking out first certificate. 14 under 14$ years.............................................. . 14$ under 15 years................................................ 15 under 15$ years................................................ 15$ under 16 years................................................ Girls. Boys. Children. Per cent N u m b er. distribu tion. Per cent Per cent um b er. distribu d u m b er. distribu tion. tion. 11,703 100.0 1,048 100.0 655 100.0 550 468 302 383 32.3 27.5 17.7 22.6 354 300 188 206 33.8 28.6 17.9 19.6 196 168 114 177 29.9 25.6 17.4 27.1 166 89 65 25 18 6 14 9.7 5.2 3.8 1.5 1.1 .4 .8 101 43 35 15 5 4 3 9.6 4.1 3.3 1.4 .5 .4 .3 65 46 30 10 13 2 11 9.9 7.0 4.6 1.5 2.0 .3 1.7 1,089 100.0 620 100.0 469~ 100.0 486 302 171 130 44.6 27.7 15.7 11.9 288 194 73 65 46.5 31.3 11.8 10.6 198 108 98 65 42.2 23.0 20.9 13.8 71 36 11 8 2 6.5 3.3 1.0 .7 .2 40 14 4 6 6.5 2.3 .6 1.0 31 22 7 2 2 6.6 4.7 1.5 .4 •4 2 .2 1 .2 1 1,191 100.0 740 100.0 451 100.0 434 191 76 39 58.6 25.8 10.3 5.3 246 109 55 41 54.5 24.2 12.2 9.1 680 300 131 80 57.1 25.2' 11.0 6.8 • 58 12 9 1 4.9 1.0 .8 .1 31 5 3 4.2 .7 .4 •2; 6.0 1.6 1.3 .2 ---------------- 100.0 698 27 7 6 1 1,709 100.0 1,011 100.0 1,382 248 59 20 80.9 14.5 3.5 1.2 828 136 36 11 81.9 13.5 3.6 1.1 554 112 23 9 79.4 16.0 3.3 1.2 14 3 3 .8 .2 .2 6 3 2 .6 .3 .2 8 1.1 1 .1 1 Including three children who went to work before they were 14 years of age according to continuation school records, but who did not secure employment certificates until after they were 14. Table 87 shows that, of all the children who took out certificates in the four cities— Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea— between the ages of 14 and 14^-, and who therefore had from 18 months to 2 years of possible working histories before their sixteenth birthdays, nearly one-third, 32.3 per cent, held only 1 certificate each but almost one-fourth, 22.6 per cent, held 4 or more certificates. Tb^ proportion holding only 1 certificate increased to 44.6 per cent among the children who began work between 14^ and 15, to 57.1 per cent https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. 185 among those who began between 15 and 15£, and to 80.9 per cent among those who began between 15£ and 16. - At the same time the proportion holding 4 or more certificates fell to 11.9 per cent, to 6.8 per cent, and to 1.2 per cent, respectively, among the children who went to work at each of these three different ages. Those who went to work between 15£ and 16, of whom 80.9 per cent held only 1 position and only 1.2 per cent held 4 or more positions, had, of course, less than 6 months of possible work histories before their sixteenth birthdays. Fourteen of the children who received their first certi ficates between 14 and 14| years of age and 2 of those who received them between 14-| and 15 years of age took out 10 o r‘m ore certificates before they became 16; 12 of these children were girls and 4 were boys. One of the girls had taken out 16 certificates and 3 had taken out 13. One boy had taken out 14 certificates and another boy, and also 1 of the girls, had taken out 12.69 In each age group a smaller proportion of the girls than of the boys held only 1 position, and a larger proportion held 4 or more positions. Of the girls who took out their first certificates before they were 14£ years of age over one-fourth, 27.1 per cent, as com pared with less than one-fifth, 19.6 per cent, of the boys, held 4 or more positions. In the group of continuation-school children, none of whom had worked merely during vacation, the proportion who had held only 1 certificate was naturally smaller, and the proportion who had held 4 or more certificates larger, than in the certificate group. From Table 88 it appears that of the continuation-school children who went to work when they were between 14 and 14£ years of age less than onefourth, 22.6 per cent, as compared with nearly one-third, 32.3 per cent, of the children in the certificate group, held only 1 certificate. vOn the other hand, 28.1 per cent had held 4 or more positions as compared with 22.6 per cent in the certificate group. The tendency toward a greater amount of shifting among girls than boys is again shown in this group. Of those who took out their first certificates before they were 14£ years old about one-third, 33.6 per cent, of the girls held 4 or more positions as compared with less than one-fourth, 24.3 per cent, of the boys. Similar differences between the girls and the boys appear in each age group. 69 A t the time of this study the Boston certificate office had on file the record of 1 girl (not included in this study) who had taken out 32 certificates within a period of 15 months. For each of 3 different depart m ent stores she had taken out 2 certificates; and she had also held certificates for 3 other department stores. 2?he names of 2 candy factories appear twice and of 6 other candy factories once each in her list. The m m » of a leather goods company also appears twice. In a number of these positions she was probably never ctually employed. In 4 cases she secured certificates for one employer one day and for another the next day. . 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------- 13 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 186 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. T a b l e 8 8 . — Num ber o f certificated positions held, by age at taking out first certificate and sex; children in B oston continuation school. Children in Boston continuation school. Number of certificated positions held. Sex and age at taking out first certificate. Total. N um ber. 14 under 14J years: Both sexes— Per cent. N um ber. 23.3 21.2 323 28.1 21.8 114 150 94 167 156 24.3 33.6 194 27.3 137 19.3 14.9 14.4 25.4 12.9 17.5 710 273 B o y s ......... G i r l s .'.... 395 315 165 108 41.8 34.3 15 under 15J years B oth sexes. . . 732 374 51.1 203 27.7 B o y s ......... Girls......... 464 268 248 126 53.4 47.0 133 70 28.7 26.1 584 72.5 20.3 352 232 73.3 71.2 19.8 15 J under 16 years Both se x e s.. . B o y s......... Girls......... 480 326 Per cent. 244 14£ under 15 years: Both se x e s.. . 21.6 N um ber. 30.6 24.6 160 100 Per cent. 28.1 687 464 B o y s......... Girls......... N um ber. 210 22.6 1,151 Per cent. 30.9 22.9 95 20.3 13.0 60 8.2 6 .0 11.9 42 5.2 2.0 21.2 For the interviewed children information was secured in regard to all positions, regardless of whether certificates had been secured, and even regardless of whether the employment had been in Boston or one of the other three cities studied, or elsewhere. For these children, therefore, the record of positions held is complete. On the other hand, these children were all interviewed before they were 16 years of age, and consequently the information available relates only to the period between the date when the child went to work and thé date of the interview, and not, as for the other groups, up to his sixteenth birthday. These children, therefore, have been classified in four groups, not according to the number of positions held, but according to the average number held within different lengths of industrial history. The first group, which is called class A, consists of children who held only 1 position within a year or more; these children are called “ steady.” The second group, class B, consists of children who held, on an average, 1 position within each period of from 6 months to 1 year; they are less steady than the first group, but not exactly unsteady workers, and have been called “ active.^ The children in the third group, class C, held new positions on ai average within each period of from 3 to 6 months*; and those in thè fourth group, class D, within less than 3 months ; those in the third group tended toward unsteadiness in their work, but have been called https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 187 INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. “ restless,” while those in the fourth group were distinctly “ unT a b l e 8 9 .— Steadiness at work, by sex; children interviewed. Children. Steadiness at work.» Boys. Girls. Per cent Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu Number. distribu tion. tion. tion. T o ta l............................................................. 823 Class A — Steady................................................... Class B — A ctive................................................... Class C— Restless.................................................. Class D —.U nsteady.............................................. Class E— Indeterminate..................................... 190 203 273 66 91 , 100.0 477 100.0 346 100.0 23.1 24.7 33.2 8.0 11.1 108 123 154 35 57 22.6 25.8 32.3 7.3 11.9 82 80 119 31 23.7 23.1 34.4 9.0 9.8 34 1 Class A consists of children who each held during work histories of 1 year or more 1 position only; class B consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 for every 6 months and more than 1 for every 12 months of their work histories; class C consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 position for every 3 months and more than 1 for every 6 months of their work histories; class D consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate more than 1 position for every 3 months of their work histories; class E consists of children who each held a single position which had not terminated at the end of a work history record of less than 1 year’ s duration. Table 89 gives for all the interviewed children and for each sex separately the results of this classification. Not far from one-fourth, 23.1 per cent, of all the children were found to be steady workers, and a somewhat larger proportion, 24.7 per cent, were classified as ^ a ctiv e” because they held on an average 1 position within each period of from 6 months to 1 year. About a third, 33.2 per cent, were found to have held new positions, on an average, within every period of from 3 to 6 months, and 8 per cent within every 3 months. A somewhat larger proportion of the girls than of the boys were found in each of the last two groups. This fact confirms the conclusion arrived at in considering the number of positions held by the certifi cate and continuation school children, that the girls were more likely to shift, that is, were less steady workers, than the boys. That the girls worked less steadily than the boys appears, however, to have been due largely, if not entirely, to the peculiarities of many of the occupations open to them. The girls, as will be seen later,71 were more frequently than the boys employed to assist for short periods in sales in department or dry goods stores. In some cases, according to reports made to agents of the bureau, girls were even required, after having secured certificates on promises of employ ment from department stores, to wait without work and without pay until needed, sometimes for several days; in some cases they would never be employed at all, and in many others, as soon as the emporary rush of trade was over, they would be dropped. That many children took out certificates for positions in which they were never actually employed appears in. Table 111,72 which 70 See Appendix, “ Case Studies,” for summaries of typical work histories of children of these different classes. 71 See Table 129, p p . 264-265. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 188 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. shows that 117 such certificates were taken out by continuationschool children. This was apparently much more likely to occu to girls than to boys. In 80 cases girls took out certificates which were never used, while only 37 such certificates were taken out by boys. For the children who were interviewed only positions actually held were included in the tabulations. Forty of these children secured certificates for positions in which they never actually worked, 38 of them for regular positions and 2 for school positions. Two of these children had 2 such experiences, so that the number of positions for which children secured certificates but in which they never worked was 42. On the other hand, 9 children held 2 positions at the same time. The children who shifted their positions frequently were more likely to be retarded in their school work than were the steady workers. Table 90 shows, for the continuation-school children who took out their first certificates before they were 15 years of age,*3 that about two-fifths, 40.6 per cent, of those who held 4 or more positions, as compared with only about one-fourth, 25.5 per cent, of those who held but 1 position, were retarded. The amount of retardation increased steadily with the number of positions held.. On the other hand, the proportion of children who had complete« higher grades than normal for their ages decreased from 11.8 per^ cent among the children who held only 1 position to 8.6 per cent among those who held 4 or more positions. The slight variations from this tendency which appear when the sexes are considered separately are not important enough to affect the general result. The steady workers among the interviewed children, too, as appears in Table 91, were less likely to be retarded in their school work than any other group. Although nearly one-third, 32.4 per cent, of all the interviewed children were retarded, less than one-fourth, 24.7 per cent, of the steady workers had not attained a normal grade. The largest proportion of retarded children, about two-fifths, 39.9 per cent, was found in the group of children who held a new position, on an average, within each period of from three to six months— that is, among the “ restless” children; but nearly as large a propor tion, 37.9 per cent, was found in the group where the children held new positions within each period of 3 months or less— that is, among the “ unsteady” children. On the other hand, the largest propor tion of children who had completed a higher grade than normal, 21.2 per cent, was found in the group where the children held, on an average, 1 position during every period of from 6 months to a yearnot among the “ steady” but among the “ active” children. The general tendency was the same for the girls and for the boys, although 73 M any of the children who took out their first certificates when between 15 and 16 years of age had been at work for such short periods that the figures for this group are of no particular significance. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 189 IN D U STR IAL. HISTORIES, |be group of “ active” girls had a considerably larger proportion of etarded children than had the corresponding group of boys, 35 per cent as compared with 26.8 per cent. This group of girls had also a large proportion, 20 per cent, as compared with 15.6 per cent for all girls, who had completed higher grades than normal. T able 90. — Retardation, by number o f certificated positions held, sex, and age at taking out first certificate; children in B oston continuation school. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Number of certificat ed positions held, sex, and age at tak ing out first certifi cate. A ll chil dren. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. Num- Per ber. cent. Num- Per ber. cent. Total. N um Per ber. cent. Not One or two Three or grades lower more grades reported.1 than lower than normal. normal. Num- Per ber. cent. Num- Per ber. cent. Num- Per ber. cent.3 Children 14 under 15 years: Both sexes, 1,861 202 10.9 790 42.5 586 31.5 498 26.8 88 4.7 283 15.2 533 518 381 63 60 42 11.8 11.6 11.0 256 212 161 48.0 40.9 42.3 136 150 126 25.5 29.0 33.1 120 126 107 22.5 24.3 28.1 16 24 19 3.0 4.6 5.0 78 96 52 14.6 18.5 13.6 13.3 2 positions.. 3 positions.., 4 or more po sitions____ 429 37 8.6 161 37.5 174 40.6 145 33.8 29 6.8 57 1,082 120 11.1 431 39.8 332 30.7 286 26.4 46 4.3 199 18.4 325 332 207 48 36 23 14.8 10.8 11.1 144 125 44.3 37.7 39.1 79 95 67 24.3 2 8.6 32.4 70 83 60 21.5 25.0 29.0 9 12 7 2 .8 3.6 3.4 54 76 36 16.6 22-9 17.4 218 13 6 .0 81 37.2 91 41.7 73 33.5 18 8.3 33 15.1 779 82 10.5 359 46.1 254 32.6 212 27.2 42 5.4 84 10.8 208 186 174 15 24 19 7.2 12.9 10.9 112 87 80 53.8 46.8 46.0 ’ 57 55 59 27.4 29.6 33.9 50 43 47 24.0 23.1 27.0 7 12 12 3.4 6.5 6.9 24 20 16 11.5 10.8 9.2 211 24 11.4 80 37.9 83 39.3 72 34.1 11 5.2 24 11.4 Children 15 under 16 years : Both sexes............ 1,538 123 8.0 832 54.1 480 31.2 363 23.6 117 7 .6 103 6.7 87 27 6 9.1 7 .4 4 .4 529 192 72 55.2 52.3 52.6 283 123 46 29.5 33.5 33.6 219 90 35 22.9 24.5 25.5 64 33 11 6 .7 9 .0 8.0 59 25 13 6.2 6 .8 9 .5 B oys. 2 positions... 3 positions... 4 or more po sitions........ Girls. 2 positions.. ' 3 positions... 4 or more po sitions........ 1 position___ 2 positions... 3 positions... 4 or more po s i t io n s ..... B oys. 1 position___ 2 positions., . 3 positions.. . 4 or more po sitions____ Girls. 1 position___ 2 p ositions... 3 positions.. . 4 or more po sitions........ 958 367 137 81 76 3 3.9 39 51.3 28 36.8 19 25.0 9 11.8 6 7.9 944 82 8 .7 486 51.5 300 31.8 236 25.0 64 6 .8 76 8.1 600 228 81 56 22 3 9.3 9 .6 3 .7 312 115 41 52.0 50.4 50.6 180 78 30 30.0 34.2 37.0 141 61 25 23.5 26.8 30.9 39 17 5 6 .5 7; 5 6 .2 52 13 7 8.7 5 .7 8.6 35 1 18 12 3 9 594 41 6 .9 346 58.2 180 30.3 127 21.4 358 139 56 31 5 3 8 .7 3 .6 5 .4 217 77 31 60.6 55.4 55.4 103 45 16 28.8 32.4 28.6 78 29 10 21.8 20.9 17.9 41 2 21 16 10 53 25 16 6 6 4 8.9 27 4.5 7 .0 11.5 10.7 7 12 6 2.0 8.6 10.7 2 1 1 “ N ot reported ” means that the children come from disciplinary, prevoeational, vocational, and other specialschools, and that on the records only the school attended and not the grade completed was given. 3 N ot shown where base is less th a n 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 190 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. T a b l e 91.— Retardation, by steadiness at work and sex; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than lormal. Steadiness at work and sex.1 - A higher A ll grade than chil normal. dren. A normal grade. Total. Three or One or two grades lower more grades lower than than normal. normal. Not reported. Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per N um Per N um Per ber. cent.2 ber. cent.2 ber. cent.2 ber-. cent.2 ber. cent.2 ber. cent.2 Both sexes... . S23 136 16.5 409 49.7 267 32.4 233 28.3 34 4.1 11 1.3 Class A — Steady........ Class B — A ctive......... Class C— Restless___ Class D — U nsteady. . Class E — Indetermin a te............................ 190 203 273 66 33 43 40 5 17.4 21.2 14.7 7.6 109 98 119 35 57.4 48.3 43.6 53.0 47 61 109 25 24.7 30.0 39.9 37.9 43 53 92 22 22.6 26.1 33.7 33.3 4 8 17 3 2.1 3.9 6.2 4.5 1 1 5 1 .5 .5 1.8 1.5 91 15 16.5 48 52.7 25 27.5 23 25.3 2 2 .2 3 3.3 B o y s................... 477 82 17.2 238 49.9 149 31.2 135 28.3 14 2.9 8 1.7 Class B —A c tiv e......... Class C— R estless___ 10ft 123 154 35 22 27 20 4 20 4 22.0 13.0 62 62 66 16 57. 4 50.4 42.9 24 33 65 14 22. 2 26.8 42.2 24 31 55 13 22.2 25.2 35.7 2 10 1 1.6 6.5 1 3 1 .8 1.9 5.3 Class E — Indetermin a te............................ 57 9 15.8 32 56.1 13 22.8 12 21.1 1 1.8 3 Girls.................... 346 ,54 15.6 171 49.4 118 34.1 98 28.3 20 5 .8 3 .9 Class A — Steady........ 82 80 119 31 11 16 20 1 13.4 20. 0 16.8 47 36 53 19 57.3 45. 0 44. 5 23 28 44 11 28.0 35.0 37.0 19 22 37 9 23.2 27.5 31.1 4 6 7 2 4.9 7.5 5.9 1 1.2 2 1.7 34 6 Class C— Restless___ Class E — indetermi- 16 12 11 1 ' 1 Class A consists of children who each held during work histories,of 1 year or more 1 position only; class B consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 for every 6 months and more than 1 for every 12 m onths of their work histories; class C consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 position for every 3 m onths and more than 1 for every 6 m onths of their work histories; class D consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate more than 1 posi tion for every 3 months of their work histories; class E consists of children who each held a single position which had not terminated at the end of a work history record of less than 1 year’s duration. 2 N ot shown where base is less than 50. UNEMPLOYMENT. Change of position may be effected without any period of unem ployment, as when a child secures a new place before leaving the old; but frequently, and practically always when the child is discharged, an interval is found between the old and the new position. In order to measure the importance of the problem of unemployment, the interviewed children were divided into two groups, those who had been at work less than a year and those who had been at work more than a year, and Table 92 was prepared to show the percentage of time unemployed for each of the different nativity groups. The figures for the children who had been at work less than a year are of slight significance, since this group includes children whose industrial histories were too short to permit a normal amount of unemploy ment. For all the children who had been at work more than a year https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 191 INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. the percentage-of unemployment was 14.4. It was somewhat higher, 15.1, where both the fathers and the children were native, but highest, 15.4, where both the fathers and the children were foreign born, in spite of the fact that these foreign-born children probably were more affected by economic pressure than other children 74 and, therefore, might be expected to be forced to take whatever positions were offered rather than wait for desirable places. The most significant difference, however, is that between the boys and the girls. For the boys the percentage of unemployed time was only 12.4, but for the girls it was 17. It was highest of all, 22.9, among the native girls whose fathers were also native. The high percentage for both sexes in this nativity group was due entirely to the girls, for the boys whose fathers were native had a comparatively low percentage, 10.5, of unemployment. The native boys whose fathers were foreign born came next with ,12.6 per cent of their time unemployed, and the foreign-born boys last with 16.9 per cent. Among the girls the order of the three nativity groups is exactly reversed, the foreign-born girls having the lowest percentage of unem ployment, 14.1, the native girls whose fathers were foreign born the next, 16.4, and the native girls whose fathers were also native the highest, 22.9. T a b l e 92.— U nem ploym ent, by length o f work history, n a tivity o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Percentage of time unemployed for a— Nativity of father and nativity and sex of child. Children Children who had who had been at been at work less work 1 than year or 1 year. over. Both sexes................ ................................................ 13.3 Both fathers and children n a tive................................ Fathers foreign born......................................................... Children native.......................................................... Children foreign born................................................ N ativity of fathers not reported; children native. 10.7 13.3 13.0 13.9 26.2 B oys...... ..................................................................... 10.4 12.4 Both fathers and children n ative................................ Fathers foreign born......................................................... Children n a tiv e .......................................................... Children foreign b o m ................................................ N ativity of fathers not reported; children n a tive. 10.1 10.5 13.5 G ir ls .......................................................................... 18.4 17.0 Both fathers and children n ative................................ athers foreign born......................................................... Children native.....................; ................................... Children foreign born............................................... 11.8 22.9 15.7 16.4 14.1 a N ot shown where base is less than 100 months of work histories. 74 See Table 33, p . 101. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 9.5 12.6 16.9 3 .7 19.2 19.1 19.3 192 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The percentage of unemployment was distinctly greater, as appears in Table 93, among the retarded children than among those from nor mal grades for their ages. Among the boys who had completed a higher grade than normal it was less, only 10, than among those who had completed a normal grade, 11.1; but among the girls who had completed a higher grade than normal it was nearly twice as high, 19.8, as among the boys, and higher than in any other group of girls except those who were one or two grades below normal where it was precisely the same. This peculiarity in the figures for the girls, together with the high percentage of unemployed time among the native girls of native parentage, leads to the suspicion that not all this unemployment was involuntary. In part, however, this high percentage was doubtless due to the fact that the native girls of native parentage who had completed higher grades than normal for their ages were more likely than were the girls of any other group to seek employment in department and other stores, and perhaps in other occupations where the work was unsteady, rather than in factories where short-time positions were comparatively rare. T able 9 3 .— U nem ploym ent, by length o f work history, retardation, and sex ; children interviewed. ^ Percentage of time unemployed for1— Retardation and sex. Both sexes................................................................................................... Having completed: A higher grade than norm al................................................................................ A normal grade............................................................................... A lower grade than normal................................................................................ One or two grades lower than norm al................................... Three or more grades lower than norm al................................................... N ot reported............................................................................................................ B oys............................................................................................................... Having completed: A higher grade than normal.................. ...................................................................................... A normal grade................................................................................................. A lower grade than normal.................. ................................................................... One or two grades lower than normal.............................................................................. Three or more grades lower than norm al................................................... Girls................................................................................................................................. Having completed: A higher grade than norm al.................................................................... A normafgrade..................................................................................................... A lower grade than normal............................................................................................... One or two grades lower than norm al.................................................... Three or more grades lower than normal................................................................ i N ot shown where base is less than 100 m onths of work histories. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Children Children who had who had been at been at work work 1 less than year or 1 year. over. 13.3 14.4 9.7 11. 4 16.7 16.8 16.3 13.7 12.8 17.2 17.8 11.1 17.6 10.4 12.4 8.1 7.3 14.9 15.3 10.0 11. 1 15.6 16.3 6.8 18.4 17.0 11.5 19. 8 19. 4 19. 6 18.8 19.8 15.1 19.1 19. S' 14.2 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. 193 Another unexpected showing in these figures is that both the j>oys and the girls who were very much retarded— that is, who had completed only grades three or more lower than normal for their ages had the lowest percentages of unemployment. The boys of this group had only 6.8 per cent of their time unemployed and the girls 14.2 per cent. Special reasons may have existed for the re tardation of many of these children which did not affect their ability to hold positions in industry. As already seen, many of them were foreign born 75 and were doubtless more handicapped in school than in industry by difficulties with the language. The number of positions held within specific periods had -naturally great influence over the amount of unemployment. Table 94 shows that of the children who had been at work for one year or more, the unsteady . workers that is, the children who held a new position on an average within every three months— had more than one-third, 34.9 per cent, of their time unemployed. The “ restless” workers were unemployed a little over one-fifth, 21.9 per cent, and the “ active” workers less than one-sixth, 15.1 per cent, of their time. In other words, the “ unsteady” workers had more than twice as much unem ployment as the “ active” workers. Among “ steady” workers,., oreover, the amount of unemployment was negligible, only 2.7 er cent. All the groups of girls showed higher percentages of unemployment than the corresponding groups of boys, but the difference was espe cially marked among the “ unsteady” workers. The girls in this group were unemployed for more than two-fifths, 42.6 per cent, of their time, whereas the boys were unemployed for only about onefourth, 25.1 per cent, of their time. Between the “ restless” and the “ active” girls, moreover, there was little difference, both groups having about one-fifth of their time unemployed, whereas among the boys the percentage of unemployment was nearly as high among the “ restless” as among the “ unsteady” workers, 23 per cent as compared with 25.1 per cent, but was decidedly less, 11.9 per cent among the “ active” workers. These figures again suggest that the girls much more frequently than the boys took temporary positions and when dropped were either obliged because of a scarcity of places open to them -to remain for a time unemployed or else preferred to wait for places which were quite to their liking, and frequently also temporary, rather than take whatever work might be first available. During their Briods of unemployment, many of the girls, probably assisted in housework at home and watched for advertisements of positions in the papers, whereas the boys more frequently spent all or most of their time in active search for new positions. 76 See Table 53, p . 131. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 194 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTON . T a b l e 94. — U nem ploym ent, by length o f work history, steadiness at work, and sex ; chil* dren interviewed. Percentage of time unemployed for2— Steadiness at w ork1 and sex. Children Children who had who had been at been at work 1 work less than year or over. 1 year. 13.3 Both sexes................ 14.4 2.7 15.1 21.9 34.9 Class A — Steady................. Class B —Active.................. Class C— Restless.............. . Class D — Unsteady.......... Class E —Indeterminate. 10.4 B oys........................... 12.4 1.1 Class A — Steady........— Class B — Active................ Class C— Restless.............. Class D — U nsteady.......... Class E— Indeterminate.. 11.9 23.0 25.1 G i r l s ............. ......... 18.4 Class A — Steady................ Class B — A ctive................ Class G— Restless......... . . Class D — Unsteady.......... Class E — Indeterminate. 27.1 17.0 4.7 20.1 20.6 42.6 "i'.h 1 Class A consists of children who each held during work histories of 1 year or more one position only; class B consists of children who held on an average new positions a t a rate less than 1 for every 6 months and more than one for every 12 m onths of their work histories; class C consists of children who held on an averagenew positions at a rateless than one position for every 3 m onths and more than 1 for every 6 months of their work histories; class D consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate more than 1 position for every 3 months of their work histories; class E consists of children who each held a single position which had not terminated at the end of a work history record of less than 1 year’ s duration. 2 N ot shown where base is less than 100 months of work histories. IN IT IA L W E E K L Y W A G E S .76 Table 95 gives the initial weekly wages received by the children interviewed in their first regular positions by the nativity of the children and of their fathers. About two-fifths, 41.9 per cent, of all the children received from $4 to $5, and over one-fourth, 26.5 per cent, from $3 to $4. Nearly three-fourths, 73.5 per cent, earned less than $5. Only 25 children, 3 per cent of the whole number, earned $6 or more. The boys received decidedly higher wages than the girls* Only 68.3 per cent of the boys, as compared with 80.6 per cent of the girls, received less than $5. The proportion of boys receiving less than S3 was only 2.5 per cent, as compared with 8.7 per cent of the girls; and the proportion receiving $3 but less than $4 was 17.2 per cent, as compared with 39.3 per cent of the girls. On the other hand, a larger proportion of boys than of girls was found in eao wage group over $4. Nearly half, 48.6 per cent, of the boys, butt only about one-third, 32.7 per cent, of the girls, earned $4 but less 7« In some cases the children worked on their own account in street trades and other similar occupa tions and their compensation did n ot, therefore, consist technically of wages, b u t to m ake possible a general view of the compensation received this comparatively unimportant distinction has been ignored and such earnings have been classified along with wages.' https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 195 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. than $5; and about one-fifth, 20.3 per cent, of the boys and only ne-twentieth, 5.2 per cent, of the girls earned $5 but less than $6. Of the 25 children who earned $6 or over, 19 were boys and only 6 girls. A much larger proportion of girls than of boys, 10.4 per cent as compared with 5.7 per cent, received wages which could not be classified because they were not paid, or not wholly paid, in cash, or for other reasons. The foreign-born boys appear to have received the highest initial wages earned by children of any nativity group. About one-third, 31.6 per cent, of them received $5 or more, as compared with less than one-fourth of the native sons of native and of foreign-born fathers, 23.6 per cent and 23.4 per cent, respectively. In each na tivity group the largest proportion of boys earned $4 but under $5. T able 95.— In itial weekly wage, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. j Fathers foreign born. Total. Both fathers anc children native g ' Initial weekly wage in first ” regular position and sex. N ativ Children foreign ity of born. fathers not re ported: chil Per Per dren cent cent Num native. dis dis ber. tribu tribu tion. tion. Chi idren native N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. N um ber. Both s e x e s .. . 823 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 166 100.0 29 Initial wage: Under $5............. Under $ 3 . . . $3 under $4. $4 under $5. $5 or over............ $5 under $6. $6 or over.. . O th er1................. N ot reported___ 605 42 218 345 140 115 25 63 15 73.5 . 5.1 26.5 41.9 17.0 14.0 3 .0 7.7 1.8 154 9 52 93 35 30 5 10 2 76.6 4.5 25.9 46.3 17.4 14.9 2.5 5.0 1.0 320 23 121 176 70 59 11 28 9 74.9 5.4 28.3 41.2 16.4 13.8 2.6 6 .6 2.1 111 10 38 63 31 23 8 22 2 66.9 6 .0 22.9 38.0 18.7 13.9 4.8 13.3 1.2 20 7 13 4 3 1 3 2 B o y s ................. 477 100.0 127 100.0 252 100.0 76 100.0 22 Initial wage: Under $5............. Under $ 3 . . . $3 under $4. $4 under $5. 55 or over............ 55 under 56. 56 or over... O ther1_________ N ot reported___ 326 12 82 232 116 97 19 27 8 68.3 2.5 17.2 48.6 24.3 20.3 4.0 5.7 1.7 91 2 21 68 30 25 5 6 71.7 1.6 16.5 53.5 23.6 19.7 3 .9 4.7 174 9 44 121 59 49 10 13 6 69.0 3.6 17.5 48.0 23.4 19.4 4.0 5.2 2 .4 45 1 12 32 24 20 4 6 1 59.2 1.3 15.8 42.1 31.6 26.3 5.3 7.9 1.3 16 Girls................. 346 100.0 .74 100.0 175 100.0 90 100.0 7 Initial wage: JUnder 55............. Under 5 3 . . . 53 under 54. 54 under 55. 55 or over......... 55 under 56. 56 or over.. . O ther1................. N ot reported___ 279 30 136 113 24 18 6 36 7 80.6 8.7 39.3 32.7 6 .9 5 .2 1.7 10.4 2 .0 63 7 31 25 5 5 85.1 9.5 41.9 33.8 6 .8 6 .8 4 2 5 .4 2 .7 146 14 77 55 11 10 1 15 3 83.4 8.0 44.0 31.4 6.3 5.7 0.6 8.6 1.7 66 9 26 31 7 3 4 16 1 73.3 10.0 28.9 34.4 7 .8 3.3 4 .4 17.8 1.1 5 11 3 3 2 1 4 2 2 1 i 1 1 1 Including positions where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay, and where he worked for less than one week on piecework or only one day each week. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 196 T H E . W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . The largest proportion of girls in each nativity group, except the^ foreign-born children of foreign-born fathers, earned only from $3 to $4. Among the girls as among the boys, the foreign born earned somewhat higher initial wages than the native born, 34.4 per cent of the foreign born earning from $4 to $5, and 28.9 per cent from $3 to $4; the corresponding percentages for the native children of for eign-born fathers were 31.4 and 44, and those for the children of native fathers were 33.8 and 41.9. Of the foreign-born girls, more over, 7.8 per cent received $5 or more, while of the native daughters of.foreign-born fathers only 6.3 per cent, and of the native daughters of native fathers 6.8 per cent received $5 or more. Furthermore, an unusually large proportion, 17.8 per cent, of the foreign-born girls received wages which could not be classified in dollars and cents; if these had been disregarded in making the percentages, the advantage of the foreign born over the native girls in the matter of initial wages would have appeared even more pronounced than in the table as given. T a b l e 96.— Initial weekly wage in first regular position, by time o f entering industry and sex; children interviewed. Children who went to work— .i p Initial weekly wage in first regular position and sex. Both sexes. . . Initial wage: Under $ 5 .______ Under S 3 ... $3 under S4. 54 under S5. $5 or over........... 55 under S6. 56 or o v e r .. Other1................. N ot reported... B oys................ Initial wage: Under $5.......... Under S 3 ... 53 under $4. 54 under S5. $5 or over........... 55 under S6. 56 or over. . Other1................. N ot reported... Girls___ _____ Initial wage: Under $5............ Under S 3 ... $3 under S4. S4 under S5. S5 or over........... $5 under S6. S6 or over. . Other1................. N ot rep orted... 1 Including positions'where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay, and where he worked for less than one week on piecework or only one day a week. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. 197 The children who went to work during the summer vacation, according to Table 96, received somewhat higher initial wages than those who went to work at some other time. Of the boys who went to work during the summer vacation 27.3 per cent, and of those who went to work at some other time only 23.3 per cent, received $5 or more. For the girls the corresponding percentages were 8.7 and 6.2, respectively. The wages received by children who left school for economic reasons were, upon the whole, lower than those received by children who left school for other reasons. Table 97 shows that three-fourth®, 75.1 per cent, of the children who gave economic necessity as their reason for leaving school, as compared with only 71.8 per cent of the children who gave other reasons, received initial wages of less than $5. In this respect the girls appear to differ from the boys, but the difference is probably due, in part at least, to the large proportion, 13.7 per cent, of girls who left school for economic reasons whose wages were not reported in cash. As might be expected, it appears from Table 98 that the children who were advanced in their school work had higher initial weekly wages in their first regular positions than the children from normal grades, and that the wages of the latter were higher than those of the retarded children. Almost one-fourth, 22.1 per cent, of the advanced children received $5 pr more, as compared with about one-sixth, 16.4 per cent, of the normal children and with only 14.6 per cent of the retarded children. The boys and girls who had completed higher grades than normal had larger percentages receiving $5 or over than did the children who had completed only normal grades, and the percentage of the normal children who were in that wage group was larger than the percentage of children who had failed to complete normal grades for their ages. Nevertheless, nearly nine-tenths, 88.9 per cent, of the girls who were advanced in their school studies re ceived less than $5 a week in their first regular positions, over half, 53.7 per cent, of them receiving from $3 to $4. A much larger pro portion of the normal than of the advanced girls, 10.5 per cent as compared with 1.9 per cent, and a still larger proportion, 13.6 per cent, of the retarded girls took positions the initial wages of which could not be classified. The children who worked before leaving school were decidedly ' more likely to get the better-paid positions when they finally left school. According to Table 99, over one-fourth, 25.9 per cent, of hese children, as compared with little more than one-tenth, 11.2 er cent, of those who did not work before leaving school, received initial wages of $5 or more in their first regular positions. Moreover, only 3.1 per cent of those who worked, as compared with 6.4 per cent https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 198 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, of those who did not work, received less than $3, and 19.8 per cent or the former, as compared with 30.9 per cent of the latter, received $ but less than $4. That these differences were not due merely to the large preponderance of boys, who generally receive higher wages than girls, among the children who worked before leaving school is shown by a comparison of the percentages given in this table for the boys alone. T a b l e 97 — Initial weekly wage in first regular position and reason fo r leaving school, and sex; children interviewed. Children who left school for— Initial weekly wage in first regular posi tion and sex. Economic reasons. Other reasons. Reasons not re ported. Per cent Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu Number. distribu tion.1 tion. tion. 100.0 333 100.0 100.0 165 100.0 100.0 Initial wage: Under $5................ Under $3........ $3 under $ 4 ... 84 under 8 5 ... $5 or over............... $5 under 8 6 ... 86 or over___ Other2..................... N ot reported........ 7 4 72.7 1.2 20.6 50.9 20.6 18.2 2.4 4.2 2.4 18 3 64.5 2.3 16.4 45.8 27.5 22.5 5.0 6.9 « 1.1 2 1 10.0 56.0 20.0 16.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 Girls.................... 168 100.0 146 100.0 32 100.0 Initial wage: Under 85................ Under 83........ 83 under 8 4... $4 under 8 5... 85 or over.............. 85 under 8 6... 86 or over___ Other2................... . N ot reported____ 130 15 65 50 13 10 3 23 2 124 14 59 51 8 6 2 11 3 84.9 9.6 40.4 34.9 5.5 4.1 1.4 7.5 2.1 25 1 12 12 3 2 1 2 2 Both sexes........ Initial wage: Under $5................ Under $3........ $3 under $ 4 ... $4 under $ 5 ... $5 or over............... $5 under $ 6 ... , $6 or over___ Other2..................... N ot reported........ Boys.................. , 77.4 8.9 38.7 29.8 7.8 6.0 1.8 13.7 1.2 1 1 74.0 8.0 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. . 2 Including positions where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay, and where he worked for less than one week on piecework or only one day each week. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ly y IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. T a b l e 98.— Initial weekly wage in first regular position , by retardation and sex; chil dren interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages- A lower grade than normal. Initial weekly wage in first regu lar position and sex. Both sexes. Initial wage: Under $5.................................... Under $3.......... ................. $3, under #4...................... $4, under $5...................... $5 of over.................................. $5, under ¿ 6 ...................... ’ ’ ’ I $6 or over................................. O ther1.............................................. N ot reported............................ B oys.................. A higher grade than normal. One or two grades lower Three | N ot or than normal, more report gradas ed. lower Per Per Per Per than N um cent N um cent N um cent N um cent ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri nor mal. bution. bution. bution bution. 136 100.0 Total. 409 267 100.0 238 100.0 100.0 3.0 10.5 2.2 149 100.0 100.0 72.5 6.4 26.6 39.5 15.9 12.9 3.0 9.0 11.6 62.2 2.6 135 100.0 65.9 3 .0 17.0 45.9 23.7 19.3 4.4 1.2 13.4 47.6 30.5 24.4 6.1 8.1 2.2 7.3 54 233 72.7 6.7 27.7 38.2 14.6 6.6 2.0 7 82 100.0 75.1 4.2 24.9 46.0 16.4 13.7 2.7 24 6 Initial wage: Under $5.............. , Under $3___ $3, under $4. $4, under $5. $5 or over............. $5, under $6. $6 or o v e r.. . Other1................... N ot reported___ Girls.................. A normal grade. 171 100.0 100.0 Initial wage: Under $5.............. Under 13____ $3, under $4. $4, under $5. $5 or over............. $5, under $6. $6 or o v e r .. . O ther1. . . ............ Not reported___ 1 Including positions where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing weefc ° yer an<^ wkere he worked for less than one week on piecework or only one day each A larger proportion of the children who secured their first regular positions through friends or relatives than of those who secured them in any other way, as appears in Table 100, received initial weekly wages of $5 or more. Of the positions secured by friends or relatives 18 per cent, while of those secured independently only 16.8 per cent, and of those secured through an employment agency, a school, or a lacement bureau only 14.3 per cent, paid these wages. Moreover, jfi an unusually large proportion of such positions, 12.3 per cent, as compared with only 1.3 per cent of the positions secured independ ently and 5.4 per cent of those secured through an employment https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TH E WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. 200 agency, a school, or a placement bureau, the wages were not paid or not wholly paid in cash or for some other reason could not be classi fied on a cash basis. If in any of these positions the remuneration amounted to $5 or more the financial advantage of securing positions through friends or relatives over securing them in any other way was even greater than is here represented. Fifty-two children stated to the bureau agents that their wages had been docked because of attendance at continuation school. T a b l e 99.— Initial weekly wage in first regular position, by em ploym ent before leaving school, and sex; children interviewed. Children who, before leaving school— D id not work. W orked. Initial weekly wage in first regular position, and sex. Per cent Per cent Number. distribu Number. distribu tion.1 tion. 1 100.0 B oth sexes........ 499 100.0 197 100.0 Initial wage: Under $5................ Under $3____ $3, under $4.. $4, under $5.. $5 or over.............. $5, under $6.. $6 or over___ O ther2.................. . Not reported-----B o y s.................. Initial wage: Under $5.............. Under $3-----$3, under $4. $4, under $5. 35 or over............. $5, under $6. 86 or over. . . O ther2.................. Not reported— 180 302 100.0 Girls.................. Initial wage: Under 85.............. Under 8 3 . . . 83, under 84. 84, under 85. 85 or over............. 85, under 86 86 or over. . . Other2.................. Not reported— 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. .... . , . ... 2 Including positions where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay, and where he worked for less than one week on piecework or only one day each week. C H A N G E IN W E E K L Y W A G E S . The weekly wages received may have increased or decreased either within the same position or between the time a child took his first regular position and the date of the interview. The increases which occurred without change of position are considered in discussing the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 201 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. subject of occupations.77 Those which occurred between the time fehe children took their first regular positions and the date of the in terview are best measured by considering only children who had been at work for one year or more. Those who had been at work a shorter time had hardly had adequate opportunity to obtain an increased wage or to show their value in the industrial world. In Table 101 the increases received by children of the different nativity groups who had been at work for one year or more are compared. T able 100. — In itial weekly wage in first regular -position, by method o f securing position and sex; children interviewed. Children securing first position b y specified m ethod. Initial weekly wage in first regular position and sex. Friend or rela Independently. tiv e. N o tre ported. N um ber. B oth sexes.... Em ploym ent agency, school, placement bureau, etc. Em ploym ent offered. Per cent N um distriber. bution. Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent distridistriber. distriber. bution.« bution.« bution. 406 100.0 .316 100.0 38 Under $5............. Under $ 3 . . . $3, under $4 $4, under $5 $5 or over............ $5, under $6 $6 or o v e r... Other ............. N ot r e p o rte d ... 277 18 106 153 73 63 10 50 6 68.2 4 .4 26.1 37.7 18.0 15.5 2 .5 12.3 1.5 253 16 91 146 53 43 10 4 6 80.1 5.1 28.8 46.2 16.8 13.6 3.2 1.3 1.9 27 5 8 14 6 3 3 4 1 100.0 56 100.0 7 44 2 13 29 8 6 2 3 1 78.6 3 .6 23.2 51.8 14.3 10.7 3.6 5.4 1.8 4 1 43 100.0 5 mtialwage: B o y s ................. 212 100.0 186 100.0 31 Initial wage: Under $5............. Under $ 3 . . . $3, under $4 $4, under $5 $5 or-over............ $5, under $6 $6 or over... O th er»................. N ot re p o rte d ... 130 3 35 92 57 51 6 23 2 61.3 1.4 16.5 43.4 26.9 24. i 2.8 10.8 .9 136 6 33 97 46 37 9 73.1 3 .2 17.7 52.2 24.7 19.9 4.8 4 2 .2 21 2 7 12 6 3 3 3 1 Girls.................. 194 100.0 130 100.0 7 147 15 71 61 16 12 4 27 4 75.8 7.7 36.6 31.4 8.2 6 .2 2.1 13. 9 2.1 117 10 58 49 7 6 1 4 2 90.0 7.7 44.6 37.7 5.4 4.6 .8 3.1 1.5 6 3 1 2 Initial wage: Under $5............. Under $ 3 . . . $3, under $4 $4, under $5 $5 or over............ $5, under $6 $6 or over... Other » ................ N ot rep orted.. . 100.0 3 2 1 4 1 35 7 28 7 6 1 3 1 1 100.0 13 100.0 2 9 2 6 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 ✓ s N ot shown where base is less than 50. 'll» Including positions where wage was not paid in cash or not all in cash, where child worked for nothing employer failed to pay, and where he worked less than one week on piecework or only one day each week. n S e e p p . 277 to 280. 4 9 4 7 0°— 22------ 14 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 202 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T a b l e 101.— Change in weekly wage between first and last regular positions, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed with industrial histories o f one year or Over. Children with industrial histories of one year or over. Fathers for eign born. Both fathers and children native. Total. Change in weekly wage be tween first and last regular position,1 and sex. Children native. Children foreign b om . N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. Num ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. 100.0 330 100.0 117 100.0 59.2 39.2 9.8 29.4 30.1 20.3 8.4 .7 234 142 44 98 92 55 23 13 1 70.9 43.0 13.3 29.7 27.9 16.7 7.0 3.9 .3 77 50 17 33 27 12 11 3 1 65.8 42.7 14.5 28.2 23.1 10.3 9.4 2.6 .9 .7 4.9 21.0 4.9 18 55 23 5.5 16.7 7.0 9 13 7.7 11.1 k 15.4 88 100.0 190 100.0 51 100.0 57 34 9 25 23 13 8 1 64.8 38.6 10.2 28.4 26.1 14.8 9.1 1.1 137 88 20 68 49 26 11 11 1 72.1 46.3 10.5 35.8 25.8 13.7 5.8 5.8 .5 34 24 6 18 10 8 2 66.7 47.1 11.8 35.3 19.6 15.7 3.9 1 6 21 4 1.1 6.8 23.9 4.5 5 35 13 2.6 18.4 6.8 6 5 6 11.8 9.8 11.8 100.0 55 100.0 140 100.0 66 100.0 68.8 38.7 15.0 23.7 30.1 18.4 9.4 1.9 .4 7.1 13.9 10.2 42 22 5 17 20 16 4 76.4 40.0 9.1 30.9 36.4 29.1 7.3 97 54 24 30 43 29 12 2 69.3 38.6 17.1 21.4 30.7 20.7 8.6 1.4 1 9 3 1.8 16.4 5.5 13 20 10 9.3 14.3 7.1 43 26 11 15 17 4 9 3 1 3 8 12 65.2 39.4 16.7 22.7 25.8 6.1 13.6 4.5 1.5 4.5 12.1 18.2 N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. Both sexes.................. 607 100.0 • 143 Increase in weekly w a g e.. Under $2................... . Under $1................. $1 under $2............. 82 and over................ $2 under $3............. $3 under $ 4 . . . . . . . $4 under $ 6 . , ......... 86 under $10........... 810 or over.............. Decrease in weekly wage.. N o change............................... N ot reported......................... 421 255 76 179 166 97 49 17 2 1 36 99 51 69.4 42.0 12.5 29.5 27.3 16.0 8.1 2.8 .3 .2 5.9 16.3 8.4 99 56 14 42 43 29 12 1 1 7 30 7 B o y s . . . . ..................... 341 100.0 Increase in weekly wage. . Under 8 2 . . ..................... Under 8 1 . . . .......... $1 under 82............. 82 and over................ 82 under $3............. 83 under 8 4 ........... 84 under 8 6 . . . — 86 under 810........... 810 or over.............. Decrease in weekly wage. N o change.............................. N ot reported......................... 238 152 36 116 86 48 24 12 1 1 17 62 24 69.8 44.6 10.6 34.0 25.2 14.1 7.0 3.Ä .3 5.0 18.2 7.0 Girls.............................. 266 Increase in weekly wage.. Under 82........................ Under 81................. $1 under 82---------82 and over.................... 82 under 83............ 83 under 84............ 84 under 86............ 86 under 810.......... Decrease in weekly wage. N o change.............................. N ot reported...... .................. 183 103 40 63 80 49 25 5 1 19 37 27 Nativ ity of fathers not re ported; chil dren native. 1 Difference between wage in first and last regular position. The weekly wages of nearly seven-tenths, 69.4 per cent, of all the children who had been at work for as long as a year previous to the interview had increased; those of about one-sixth, 16.3 pe$ cent, had remained stationary; and those of a little over one-twei tieth, 5.9 per cent, had decreased. The majority of increases amounted to less than $2, the largest number being in the group $1 but less than $2. Of all the children included over four-tenths, 42 per cent, had received increases of less than $2 in their weekly^ https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 203 IN D U S T R IA L HISTORIES, ¡wages, and nearly three-tenths, 29.5 per cent, had received increases if $1 but less than $2. On the other hand, 20 children, 3.3 per cent, had received increases of $4 or more. T a b l e 102.— Change in weekly wage between first and last regular 'positions, by retarda tion and sex; children interviewed with industrial histories o f one year or over. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages- A lower grade than normal. Change in weekly wage between first and last regular positions1 and sex. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. One or two grades lower Three Not or than normal. more report grades ed. Per lower Per Per Per than cent N um N um cent N um cent N um cent distri nor ber. ber. distri ber. distri ber. distri bu mal. bution. bution. bution. tion.* Total. Both sexes................. 112 100.0 308 100.0 181 100.0 165 100.0 16 6 Increase in weekly wage.. Under $2......................... Under $1................. $1 under $2............ $2 and over.................... $2 under $3............ S3 under $4............ $4 under $6............ $6 under $10.......... $10 or over............. Decrease in weekly wage. N o change.............................. N ot reported......................... 87 52 14 38 35 18 12 4 1 77.7 46.4 12.5 33.9 31.3 16.1 10.7 3.6 .9 224 131 42 89 93 58 24 10 1 72.7 42.5 13.6 28.9 30.2 18.8 7.8 3 .2 .3 107 71 19 52 36 21 11 3 59.1 39.2 10.5 28.7 19.9 11.6 6.1 1.7 95 63 16 47 32 18 10 3 57.6 38.2 9.7 28.5 19.4 10.9 6.1 1.8 12 8 3 5 4 3 1 3 1 1 2 1 15 9 .9 13.4 8.0 21 43 20 6.8 14.0 6 .5 1 14 40 20 .6 7.7 22.1 11.0 1 14 37 19 .6 8 .5 22.4 11.5 3 1 1 2 2 B oys............................. 68 100.0 171 100.0 99 100.0 93 100.0 6 3 Increase in weekly wage.. Under $2......................... Under $1................. $1 under $2............ $2 and over.................... $2 under $3............ $3 under $4............ $4 under $6............ $6 under $10.......... $10 or over............. Decrease in weekly wage. Nochange............................. N ot reported......................... 54 31 6 25 23 10 8 4 1 79.4 45.6 8.8 36.8 33.8 14.7 11.8 5 .9 1.5 123 77 19 58 46 29 11 6 71.9 45.0 11.1 33.9 26.9 17.0 6 .4 3 .5 60 43 10 33 17 9 5 2 60.6 43.4 10.1 33.3 17.2 9.1 5.1 2.0 54 39 9 30 15 7 5 2 58.1 41.9 9.7 32.3 16.1 7.5 5.4 2 .2 6 4 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 10 4 14.7 5 .9 io 29 9 5.8 17.0 5.3 1 7 22 10 Í.Ó 7.1 22.2 10.1 1 7 22 10 i. i 7.5 23.7 10.8 Girls............................. 44 100.0 137 100.0 82 100.0 72 100.0 10 3 47 28 9 19 19 12 6 1 57.3 34.1 11.0 23.2 23.2 14.6 7 .3 1.2 41 24 7 17 17 11 5 1 56.9 33.3 9 .7 ¡23.6 23.6 15.3 6 .9 1.4 6 4 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 18 10 8 .5 22.0 12.2 7 15 9 9.7 20.8 12.5 3 1 1 Increase in weekly wage.. Under $2........................ Under $1................. $1 under $2............ $2 and over................... $2 under $3............ $3 under $4............ $4 under $6............ $6 under $10.......... Decrease in weekly wage. N o change............................ N ot reported........................ 33 21 8 13 12 8 4 1 5 5 101 54 23 31 47 29 13 4 1 11 14 11 73.7 39.4 16.8 22.6 34.3 21.2 9 .5 2 .9 .7 8.0 10.2 8.0 1 1 2 1 Difference between wage in first and last regular position. -» Bate not shown where base is less than 50. Not only was the proportion of girls whose wages had increased nearly as high as that of boys, 68.8 per cent as compared with 69.8 percent, but the proportion receiving increases of $2 or over was higher, 30.1 as compared with 25.2 per cent. This was in spite o f the fact https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 204 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . that a larger proportion of the girls than of the boys failed to repor on this point. Nevertheless, decreases had occurred in the wages of larger proportion of the girls than of the boys, 7.1 per cent as com pared with 5 per cent. Increases of $2 or more were received by a larger proportion, 30.1 per cent, of the native children of native fathers than of the native children of foreign-born fathers, 27.9 per cent, and by a larger proportion of the latter than of the foreign-bom children, 23.1 per cent. It should be noted, however, in considering these figures, that only 4.9 per cent of the native children whose fathers also were native, as compared with 7 per cent of those whose fathers were foreign born and with 15.4 per cent of the foreign-born children, failed to make a report as to whether their wages had increased or decreased. Nevertheless, even if these children were excluded, the same relationship would exist between the three groups, as to in creases of $2 or more. Moreover, the report that their wages had been stationary was made by 21 per cent of the native children of native fathers and by only 16.7 per cent of the native children of foreign-born fathers and 11.1 per cent of the foreign-born children. Decreases were reported by only 4.9 per cent of the native children of native fathers as compared with 5.5 per cent of the native children of foreign-born fathers and with 7.7 per cent of the foreign-born children. Apparently it is safe to conclude that in the matter of wage increases the immigrant children are not so well oif as those whose fathers were immigrants, and the latter are not so well off as the children of native fathers. According to Table 102, the wages of a decidedly larger proportion of the children who had completed higher grades than normal, 77.7 per cent, than of those in any other group increased between their first regular positions and the date of interview; next came the children from normal grades, 72.7 per cent of whom received wage increases; and last came the retarded children, only 59.1 per cent of whom received higher wages in their last than in their first regular positions. Moreover, the wages of only one child from a higher grade than normal decreased, whereas decreases were noted in the wages of 6.8 per cent of the children from normal grades and of 7.7 per cent of those from lower grades than normal. Almost one-fourth, 22.1 per cent, of the retarded children reported no change in wages, as compared with only 14 per cent of the normal children and 13.4 per cent of the advanced children. The increase in weekly wages amounted to $2 or more for 31.3 p e’ cent of the advanced children, 30.2 per cent of the children fro: normal grades, and only 19.9 per cent of the retarded children. It was as much as $1 but less than $2 for about one-third, 33.9 per cent, of the advanced children, as compared with 28.9 per cent of the normal and 28.7 per cent of the retarded children. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 205 IN D U S T R IA L HISTORIES, T a b l e 103. — Change in weekly wage between first and last regular positions, by steadiness Itr-- at work and sex; children interviewed with industrial histories o f one year or over. Children of specified steadiness at work. Class B 2— Active Class A*— Steady. Class C2— Restless. Change in weekly wage,1 and sex. N um ber. Both sexes................. Increase in weekly wage. . Under $2......................... Under $1................. ■$1, under $2......... . $2 or over........................ $2, under $3........... $3, under $ 4 ._____ $4, under 8 6........... $6, under $10......... $10 or over............. Decrease in weekly w age.. N o change................ ........... * Not reported......................... B o y s ........................... Increase in weekly wage. . Under $2......................... Under $1................. $1, under $ 2........... $2 or over........................ $2, under $3........... $3, under $4........... $4, under $6........... $6, under $10......... $10 or over.............. Decrease in weekly wage. N o change.............................. N ot reported......................... Per cent distributton. N um ber. Per cent N um distriber. button. Class D 2— Per U ncent steady.8 distributton. 191 100.0 200 100.0 182 100.0 34 146 88 23 65 58 33 20 4 76.4 46.1 12.0 34.0 30.4 17.3 10.5 2.1 137 79 24 55 58 34 14 9 1 68.5 39.5 12.0 27.5 29.0 17.0 7.0 4.5 .5 119 75 23 52 44 26 13 4 1 65.4 41.2 12.6 28.6 242 14.3 7.1 2.2 .5 19 13 6 7 6 4 2 1 1 40 4 .5 .5 20.9 2.1 16 29 18 ao 14.5 9.0 14 24 25 7.7 13.2 13.7 5 6 4 109 100.0 120 100.0 97 100.0 15 83 47 13 34 36 17 11 7 1 69.2 39.2 ' 10.8 28.3 30.0 14.2 9.2 5.8 .8 64 44 11 33 20 14 3 3 60.0 45.4 11.3 34.0 20.6 14.4 3.1 3.1 5 3 1 2 2 1 1 7 20 10 5.8 16.7 8.3 7 16 10 7.2 16.5 10.3 3 5 2 86 58 11 47 28 16 9 2 7a 9 53.2 10.1 43.1 25.7 14.7 8.3 1.8 1 .9 2Ì 2 19.3 1.8 Girls............................. 82 100.0 80 100.0 85 100.0 19 Increase in weekly wage.. Under $2............. ........... Under $1_________ $1, under $2........... $2 or over........................ $2, under $3......... . $3, under $4......... . $4, under $ 6......... . $6, under $10_____ Decrease in weekly w age. N o change............................ . N ot reported....................... . 60 30 12 18 30 17 11 2 73.2 36.6 14.6 22.0 36.6 20.7 13.4 2.4 54 32 11 21 22 17 3 2 67.5 40.0 13.8 26.3 27.5 21.3 3.8 2.5 1.2 23.2 2.4 9 9 8 Ü. 3 11.3 10.0 64.7 36.5 14.1 22.4 28.2 14.1 11.8 1.2 1.2 a2 9.4 17.6 14 10 5 5 4 3 1 1 19 2 55 31 12 19 24 12 10 1 1 7 8 15 2 1 2 1 Difference between wage in the first and the last regular position. s Class A consists of children who each held during work histories of 1 year or more 1 position only; class B consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 for every 6 months and more than 1 for every 12 months of their work histories; class C consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 position for every 3 months and more than 1 for every 6 months of their work histories; class D consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate more than i position for every 3 months of their work histories. 8 Rate not shown where base is less than 50. The steady workers— that is, the children who held only one position yithin a period of one year or more— were more likely, according to ’’able 103, than were other children, to receive increases in wages, heir increases, too, were in general more substantial than were those of other children. Over three-fourths, 76.4 per cent, of the children classed as “ steady,” as compared with only 68.5 per cent of those https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 206 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O S T O N . classed as “ active” and 65.4 per cent of those classed as “ restless/^ received wage increases. Only one “ steady” child, but 16 “ active^! and 14 “ restless” children, reported decreases in their weekly wages. Increases of $2 or more were reported by 30.4 per cent of the “ steady” children and by 29 per cent of the “ active” and 24.2 per cent of the “ restless” children. The “ active” boys, however, showed a larger proportion of such increases than did any other group, 30 per cent, as compared with 25.7 per cent for the “ steady” boys and with 20.6 per cent for the “ restless” boys. This correlation of industrial ad vance, as measured b y changes in wages between the first regular position and the date of the interview, with steadiness in employ ment should be considered, of course, in connection with the factshown in Table 102, that this advance was also greatest among the children who were ahead and least among those children who were behind in their school work. The larger proportion of wage in creases and of substantial increases among the “ steady” workers may be due in part to the fact, shown in Table 91, that the “ steady” children were less likely than any other group to be retarded in their school work. Nevertheless, it appears probable that, in general, frequent shifting about from one position to another does not asv often lead to wage advancement as does remaining, at least for con siderable periods of time, in one position. A V E R A G E E A R N IN G S . The average monthly earnings of the interviewed children who had been at work for one year or more, as appears in Table 104, were $16.68— very little higher than those of the children who had been at work less than one year, $16.62. Even this slight difference, however, appears to suggest that the wages of children tend to rise slightly with increased industrial experience,78 for the percentage of unemployment was somewhat higher for children who had been at work one year or more than for those who had been at work for a shorter period, 14.4 as compared with 13.3. The boys had higher monthly earnings than the girls, the average for the boys who had been at work more than a year being $17.90 and that for the girls $15.06. The average monthly earnings of the girls increased, however, from $14.23 received by girls who had been at work less than a year to $15.06 received by girls who had been at work more than a year. On the other hand, the average monthly earnings of boys who had been at work less than a year were higher, $18, than of boys who had been at work more than a year, $17.90,.. This difference between the two groups of boys is doubtless due tr the fact, shown in Table 92, that the percentage of unemploymen among boys who had been at work less than a year, as might be 78The children interviewed were so nearly the same age when they began work that it was not possi ble to discover any influence of age over wages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 207 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. T a b l e 104.— Average m onthly earnings, by length o f industrial history, nativity o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Average m onthly earnings1 of— N ativity of father and nativity and sex of child. Children Children who had who had been at been at work work 1 year less than or over. 1 year. $16.62 $16.68 17.29 16.53 16.26 17.04 14.53 16.77 16.57 16.79 15.95 18.64 18.00 17.90 17.74 18.30 17.91 19.24 18.44 17.63 17.83 16.91 19.21 14.23 15.06 16.38 13.80 A 3.10 14.74 13.98 15.3Ô 15.36 15.15 " i N ot shown where base is less than 100 months of work histories. expected from the fact that they were all employed at the beginning of the period under consideration, was less than that among boys who had been at work more than a year, 10.4 as compared with 12.4. But, contrary to this expectation, the girls who had been at work less than a year were unemployed for a larger proportion of their time than were those who had been at work more than a year, 18.4 per cent as compared with 17 per cent, and this difference is reflected in their lower average earnings. The girls as a whole appear to have had a tendency, with greater length of industrial experience, to become more steady workers, and therefore to secure higher earnings than when fresh from school. The foreign-born boys, who, as already shown,79 began with higher initial wages than any other group, seem to have been unable, primarily because of unemployment, to keep this lead. Those who had been at work less than a year received higher average monthly earnings than any other group, $19.24, but the average monthly earnings of those who had been at work for over a year were lower than for any other group of boys, only $16.91. As will be seen from Table 92, this was largely due to an increase in unemployment from 8.8 per cent for the boys with shorter to 16.9 per cent for those with longer work histories; but in part it was due to the fact already mentioned80 that the weekly wage rates did not increase as much for the foreign-born as for other children. 79 See Table 95, p. 195. so See Table 101, p. 202. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 208 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The highest average monthly earnings received by any group of. children who had been at work more than a year were received byl the native boys whose fathers were also natives, $18.44. The lowest, $13.98, were received by the girls of this same nativity group. These girls, as already pointed out, were unemployed for not far from one-fourth, 22.9 per cent, of their time. Yet the average earnings of the girls of this nativity group who had been at work less than a year were $16.38, and they were unemployed, according to Table 92, only 11.8 per cent of their time. The native daughters of native fathers evidently did not share in the tendency shown by the whole group of girls to become more steady workers with greater length of experience, but their influence was not sufficient to counteract the decided tendency of both the other groups of girls— the native daughters of foreign-born fathers and the foreign-born daughters of foreign-born fathers. The girls, as will be remembered, gave economic reasons for leaving school more frequently than did the boys. Table 105 shows that the average monthly earnings of girls who gave economic reasons for leaving school were somewhat higher than those of girls who gave other reasons. The girls who had been at work more than a year and who had stated that they left school because of eco nomic need in their families, received average monthly earnings of $15.04 as compared with $14.78 received by those who had given other reasons for leaving school. The average monthly earnings of the boys who left school for economic reasons and who had been at work for a year or more were lower, however, than those of boys who left for other reasons, $17.17 as compared with $18.34. T a b l e 105.— Average m onthly earnings, by length o f industrial history, reason fo r leaving school, and sex; children interviewed. Average monthlyearnings i of— Reason for leaving school, and sex. N ot reported............................................................................................................................................... Girls................................................................................................................................................... Economic reasons.................................................................................................................................... Other reasons............................................................................................................................................. N ot reported............................................................................................................................................... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 100 months of work histories. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Children Children who had who had been at been at work work less than 1 year 1 year. or over. $16.62 $16.68 16.37 17.15 15.22 16.06 17.05 17.49 18.00 17.9Q 17.56 18.80 15.59 17.17 18.34 17.96 14.23 14.82 13.44 15.06 »15.04 14.78 16.74 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. 209 T a b l e 106.— Average m onthly earnings, by length o f industrial history, retardation, and fy ) sex; children interviewed. Average monthlyearnings 1 of— Retardation and sex. Both shxes. Having completed: A higher grade than normal... A normal grade.............. A lower grade than normal.’ . ' ’ *‘ ' ' ' ' * [ ' ' ' One or two grades lower than n o rm al' Not re orted more ^ra<^es l°wer than normal. Boys................................................. Children Children who had who had been at been at work work less than 1 year 1 year. or over. $16.62 $16.68 16.14 17.03 16.05 16.02 16.15 17.34 17.24 15.35 15.20 16.81 16.54 18.00 17.90 18.09 18.79 16.70 16.79 19.35 18.28 16.39 16.25 18.22 14.23 15.06 13.83 13.39 15.11 14.65 16.09 14.11 15.87 14.07 13.83 15.83 j Having completed: A higher grade than normal. . . A normal grade..................... A lower grade than normal.’ .’ .’ .’ *' ‘ ‘ ‘ ' **‘ ‘ * ' " One or two grades lower than n o rm al ....... XT , 1 ilre®0I! more grades lower than normal. Not reported....................................... Girls...................; ................................... Having completed: v f higher grade than normal... A normal grade......... .................... ................... A lower grade than normal.. . J \ One or two grades lower than norm al i hree or more grades lower than normal. Not reported.... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 100 months of work histories. Of the children who had been at work for a year or more those who were advanced in their school work, according to Table 106 ^ eo ? dk in Slightly higher averaSe mon^hly earnings,’ than did those who were normal, $17.24, and the l a t t e r received decidedly higher earnings than did those who were retarded, $15.35. This is doubtless due, in part, to the differences in per centages of unemployment shown in Table 93. But as the same relationship was found in the matter of initial wages and also in that of increase in wages, it can not be due entirely to unemploy ment. The low percentage of unemployment among the children who were three or more grades below normal, however, doubtless accounts for the fact that the average monthly earnings of these children were $16.81, while the earnings of the children who were retarded only one or two grades were $15.20. <The boys of the different groups as regards standing in school owed the same tendency as both sexes combined, although the differences were greater and the wages higher. But the average monthly earnings of the girls from normal grades were higher, $15.87, than those of the girls from grades higher than normal, $14.11, and the latter were only a trifle higher than the $14.07 received by https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 210 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . retarded girls. The high percentage oi unemployment among t h e j advanced girls, which has already been noted, seems sufficient ex-( planation for their failure to follow the general rule. The tendency for wages to rise with increased industrial expe rience was found mainly among the children who were advanced in their school work. The average monthly earnings of children from higher grades than normal who had been at work for one year or more were $1.20 more than those of the same class of children w p had been at work less than one year. At the same time the per centage of unemployment was much greater for the former group of children than for the latter, 13.7, as compared with on ly-9.7. For the children from normal grades the difference in earnings was only 21 cents, but for this group also the amount of unemployment was greater, though much less markedly so, 12.8 per cent as com pared with 11.4 per cent, for the children who had been at work a year or more than for those who had been at work for a shorter period. T a b l e 107 — Average m onthly earnings, by length o f industrial history, steadiness at work, and sex; children interviewed. Average m onthly earnings o f 2— Steadiness at work,1 and sex. Both sexes................. Class A — Steady................. Class B — Active.................. Class C— Restless................ Class D — Unsteady........... Class E — Indeterminate.. B oys........................... Class A — Steady................ Class B — Active................ Class C— Restless.............. Class D — Unsteady......... Class E — Indeterminate. Girls............... . Class A — Steady.............' Class B — Active................ Class C— Restless.......... : . Class D — U nsteady......... Class E — Indeterminate. 2 N o t shown where base is less than 100 months of work histones. Children Children who had who had been at been at work work 1 year less than or over. 1 year. $16.62 15.63 13.49 18.85 18.00 17.45 14.42 19.99 14.23 12.82 $16.68 19.54 16.64 14.85 10.71 17.90 20.60 17.82 15.57 15.07 15.06 18.15 14.78 13.98 7.30 "Ì6.79 \ Exactly the opposite tendency, however— that is, for wages to fall with increased industrial experience—was found among the retarded children. The average monthly earnings of retarded children who had been at work for one year or more were actually https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 211 IN D U S T R I A L H IS T O R IE S . V^70 cents lower than those of retarded children who had been at work for less than one year, yet the proportions of time unemployed were 17.2 per cent and 16.7 per cent, respectively— less difference than for any other group of children. It should be noted that the children whose standing in school was not reported and who had been at work less than one year had the highest average monthly earnings of any group, $20.93. These children, as will be remembered,81 came from vocational, prevocational, disciplinary, and other special schools which made unusual efforts to place their pupils. Decided differences, shown in Table 107, were found between the average monthly earnings of the “ steady,” “ active,” “ restless,” and “ unsteady” workers who had been at work for a year or more, differences corresponding to those found in the percentages of time unemployed of these four groups. Thus the average monthly earn ings of the “ steady” workers who were unemployed, according to Table 94, only 2.7 per cent of their time were nearly twice as high, $19.54, as those, $10.71, of the “ unsteady” workers who were unem ployed 34.9 per cent of their time. The average monthly earnings of the “ unsteady” girls, who were unemployed more than twoifths, 42.6 per cent, of their time were only $7.30, while those of the 'steady” girls, who were unemployed only 4.7 per cent of their time, were $18.15. Less difference was found among the boys. Even the “ unsteady” boys made on an average $15.07 a month, almost three-fourths as much as the “ steady” boys, who made an average of $20.60; and, as has already been noted, the “ unsteady” boys were unemployed 25.1 per cent of their time, as compared with only 1.1 per cent of unemployment for the “ steady” boys. HOURS OF LABOR. The hours worked weekly by the children interviewed, as appears in Table 108, were 48 or less in over four-fifths, 81.3 per cent, of their positions. These hours include periods of attendance at con tinuation school which are supposed to be deducted from the 48 hours permitted by law. Many of the positions here considered, however, were held during vacation and others were held before the continuation school was started or before the child had been assigned to a class. In nearly two-fifths, 39.1 per cent, of their positions, these children worked exactly 48 hours, and in not far from twoJifths, 37.8 per cent, between 36 and 48 hours. But in 15.3 per cent of their positions they worked over 48 hours— in 6.4 per cent over ,54 hours. To what extent these positions involved violations of the law limiting the hours of labor of children under 16 to 8 a day and 48 a week in most occupations a will be considered later,6 81 See p . 182. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis a Acts of 1913, ch. 831, sec. 8. 6 See pp. 322 to 331. 212 THE W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O S T O N . The law also requires that, to be excused from school attendance^/ a child must be employed for at least six hours a day.82 Yet in 84 positions, or 4.3 per cent of the entire number, these children were employed for less than 36 hours a week. The entire subject of violations of the law relating to hours of labor, however, is con sidered later, as also that of the hours worked in the various occu pations. T a b l e 108.— H ou rs w eekly, by sex o f child; regular 'positions held by children interview ed. Regular positions. A ll positions. First position. Last position Hours weekly and sex of child. Number. Both sexes.......... 1,943 Per cent Per cent distribu Num ber. distribué Number. tion. tion. 100.0 823 100.0 100.0 477 100.0 Per cent distribu tion. 823 100.0 402 84.3 Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12.......... 12 under 24___ 24 under 36___ 36 under 48___ 48 e v e n ........... Over 48 hours........ Under 54.......... 54 or o v e r .— N ot reported.......... B o y s .,.................. Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12.......... 12 under 24___ 24 under 36___ 36 under 48___ 48 even............ Over 48 hours........ Under 54.......... 54 or over........ N ot reported.......... Girls.................... . Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12........ . 12 under 24— 24 under 36— 36 under 48— 48 even............ Over 48 hours----Under 54........ 54 or over____ Not reported......... 858 850 100.0 346 100.0 86.7 0.3 0.3 2.6 38.7 44.8 346 89.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 40.2 47.7 11.6 In a larger proportion of positions held by boys than by girls, 18.2 per cent as compared with 11.5 per cent, the hours were over 48 a week, but in a smaller proportion, 35.6 per cent as compare * with 43.6 per cent, they were exactly 48. That the hours of th girls were more likely to be standardized than those of the boys is again shown by the fact that in only 2.9 per cent of the positions 82 Acts of 1913, ch. 831, sec. 8. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 213 IN D U S T R IA L HISTORIES, lield by girls as compared with 5.5 per cent of those held by boys were the hours less than 36 a week. T a b l e 109.— Hours weekly, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interviewed. Regular positions. Fathers foreign b om . Hours weekly and sex. Both fathers and children native. N um ber. Both, sexes.............. Hours weekly: 48 hours or u n d e r.. . Under 12............... 12 under 24.......... 24 under 36.......... 36 under 48.......... 48 even................. Over 48 hours............ Over 48 under 54. 54 or over............. N ot reported.............. B oys.......................... Hours weekly: 48 hours or un der.. . Under 12.............. 12 under 24.......... 24 under 36.......... 36 under 48.......... 48 even.................. Over 48 hours............ Over 48 under 54. 54 or over............. Not reported............... Girls.......................... Hours weekly: 48 hours or under___ Under 12.............. 12 under 24.......... 24 under 3 6.......... 36 under 4 8.......... 48 even.................. Over 48 hours............ Over 48 under 54. 54 or over............. Not reported.............. Per cent distributton. Children na tive. N um ber Per cent distributton. Children for eign bom . N um ber. Per cent distributton. Nativity of fathers not re ported; chil dren native. N um ber. Per cent distributton.! 459 100.0 998 100.0 426 100.0 60 100.0 383 4 5 18 167 189 62 36 26 14 83.4 .9 1.1 3.9 36.4 41.2 13.5 7.8 5.7 3.1 822 6 10 27 382 397 142 -84 58 34 82.4 .6 1.0 2.7 38.2 39.8 14.2 8.4 5.8 3.4 325 2 4 5 169 145 84 46 38 17 76.3 .5 .9 1.2 39.7 34.0 19.7 10.8 8.9 4.0 49 81.7 3 17 29 9 6 3 2 5.0 28.3 48.3 15.0 10.0 5.0 3.3 272 100.0 579 100.0’ 200 100.0 42 100.0 231 1 3 13 111 103 37 21 16 4 84.9 .4 1.1 4.8 40.8 37.9 13.6 7.7 5.9 1.5 458 6 10 18 219 205 101 62 39 20 79.1 1.0 1.7 3.1 37.8 35.4 17.4 10.7 6.7 3.5 133 1 2 3 64 63 55 27 28 12 66.5 .5 1.0 1.5 32.0 31.5 27.5 13.5 14.0 6.0 36 187 100.0 419 100.0 226 100.0 18 152 3 2 5 56 86 25 15 10 10 81.3 1.6 1.1 2.7 29.9 46.0 13.4 8.0 5.3 5.3 364 86.9 2.1 38.9 45.8 9.8 5.3 4.5 3.3 85.0 .4 .9 .9 46.5 36.3 12.8 8.4 4.4 2.2 13 9 163 192 41 22 19 14 192 1 2 2 105 82 29 19 10 5 3 15 18 6 4 2 100.0 2 11 3 2 1 2 1 Not shown where hase is less than 50. The children appear to have been more likely to work both shorter and longer hours than contemplated by law in their first than in their last positions. In their first positions 4.5 per cent but in their last positions only 2.4 per cent of them worked less than 36 hours. More o v e r, in their first positions 15.3 per cent but in their last positions only 12.4 per cent worked over 48 hours. These differences were ac companied by correspondingly larger proportions who worked ex actly 48 hours, and especially who worked from 36 to 48 hours in their last positions. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 214 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, T able 110.— H ours weekly, by initial weekly wage and Regular positions showing specified initial weekly wage. Under $5. Hours weekly and sex. Under $3. Total. $3 under $4. Per N um cent ber. distri bution.2 $4 under $5. Per Per N um cent cent distri ber. distri bution.2 bution.2 Num ber. Per cent distri bution. Num ber. 1,302 100.0 103 100.0 413 100.0 786 100.0 85.8 0 .2 1.3 2.5 37.9 43.9 12.9 8 .2 4.7 1.3 79 3 11 9 30 26 18 8 10 -6 76.7 2.9 10.7 8 .7 29.1 25.2 17.5 7.8 9.7 5.8 355 86.0 683 86.9 54 or over....................................... N ot reported........................................ 1,117 3 17 32 494 571 168 107 61 17 3 13 151 188 51 29 22 7 .7 3.1 36.6 45.5 12.3 7.0 5.3 1.7 .3 10 313 357 99 70 29 4 .4 1.3 39.8 45.4 12.6 8 .9 3.7 0 .5 B oys.................................................... 660 100.0 39 100.0 135 100.0 486 100.0 82.1 .2 2 .0 3.3 38.5 38.2 16.4 9.8 6.5 1.5 27 1 8 7 6 5 7 104 77.0 411 84.6 N ot reported........................................ 542 1 13 22 254 252 108 65 43 10 2 8 53 41 28 15 13 3 1.5 5.9 39.3 30.4 20.7 11.1 9.6 2.2 3 .7 195 • 206 73 50 23 2 .6 1.4 4oaJ 42.4 15.0 10.3 4.7 .4 Girls.................................................... 642 100.0 64" 100.0 278” 100.0 300 100.0 575 2 4 10 240 319 60 42 18 7 89.6 .3 .6 1.6 37.4 49.7 9.3 6.5 2.8 1.1 52 2 3 2 24 21 11 8 3 1 81.3 3.1 4.7 3.1 37.5 32.8 17.2 12.5 4.7 1.6 251 90.3 272 90.7 1 5 98 147 23 14 9 4 0.4 1.8 35.3 52.9 8 .3 5.0 3.2 1.4 3 118 151 26 20 6 2 1.0 39.3 50.3 8 .7 6. 7 2.0 .7 Both sexes........................................ Hours weekly: 48 hours or under............................... 12 under 24.................................... Over 48 hours...................................... Hours weekly: Hours weekly: 48 hours or under............................... 24 under 36.................................... 36 under 48.................................... Over 48 hours.................................. . Under 54........................................ 54 or over....................................... N ot reported........................................ 7 5 Both boys and girls showed this tendency toward larger propor tions of last positions than of first positions where the hours were either exactly 48 or between 36 and 48 a week. Table 109 shows that the hours were more than 48 a week in over one-fourth, 27.5 per cent, of all the positions held by foreign-born boys, as compared with not much more than one-sixth, 17.4 per cent, of those held by native boys whose fathers were foreign born and with scarcely over one-eighth, 13.6 per cent, of those held by the sons of native fathers. In 13.5 per cent of all the positions held by foreign^ born boys the hours were over 48 but under 54, and in 14 per cent theJF were over 54 a week. The long hours may account for the higher wages received by the foreign-born boys in their first positions. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 215 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. Hours weekly and sex. Both sexes. Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12. 12 under 24. 24 under 36. 36 under 48. 48 even. Over 48 hours. Under 54. 54 or over. Not reported. Boys. Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12. 12 under 24. 24 under 36. 36 under 48. 48 even. Over 48 hours. Under 54. 54 or over. N ot reported. Girls. Hours weekly: 48 hours or under. Under 12. 12 under 24. 24 under 36. 36 under 48. 48 even. Over 48 hours. Under 54. 54 or over. N ot reported. 1; Including positions where support or meals were given as part or whole of wage; also positions where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay; and where he worked for less than one week on piece work or only one day a week. 2 Rate not shown where base is less than 50. Of the positions held by foreign-born girls, however, only about oneeighth, 12.8 per cent, required over 48 hours of work a week— even less than of those held by native girls whose fathers were also native, 13.4 per cent, but more than of those held by native girls whose fathers were foreign born, 9.8 per cent. The foreign-born girls also showed a greater tendency^ than the native to secure positions where the hours were from 36 to 48, while the native girls tended to secure posi tions where the hours were exactly 48. Of all the positions held by foreign-born girls 46.5 per cent, as compared with 38.9 per cent of those held by native girls of foreign parentage and with only 29.9 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 216 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . per cent of those held by native girls of native parentage, require^ as much as 36 but less than 48 hours a week. On the other hand, only 36.3 per cent of the positions held by foreign-born girls, as com pared with 45.8 per cent of those held by native girls whose fathers were foreign-born and with 46 per cent of those held by native girls whose fathers were also native, were the hours exactly 48 a week. The hours worked in different positions naturally affected the wages paid. Thus the hours were over 48 a week, according to Table 110, in only about one-eighth, 12.9 per cent, of the positions in which the wages were less than $5 a week, but in about one-fifth, 20.4 per cent, of those in which the wages were $5 or more. At the same time the hours were less than 24 a week in considerably more than oneeighth, 13.6 per cent, of the positions paying less than $3, but in none of those paying more than $5 a week. In positions where the wages were $6 or more, as might be expected, the hours were rarely less than 36, but in one-fourth, 25 per cent, of these positions they were over 48 a week. The tendency among the girls and the boys was practi cally the same. In more than half the positions in which girls re ceived from $3 to $5 a week they worked exactly 48 hours; but it is interesting to note that in over one-sixth, 17.2 per cent, of the positions in which girls earned less than $3 a week they worked ove? 48 hours. In this case, however, the numbers involved are small. Roughly speaking, the higher rates of wages were paid for compara tively long hours and the lower rates for comparatively short hours of labor. R E A S O N S F O R L E A V IN G P O S IT IO N S . Table 111 shows that, of the positions for which reason for leaving was reported, not far from two-fifths, 38 per cent, of those left by children for whom continuation-school records were used, and over two— fifths, 42.5 per cent, of those left by children who were inter viewed were terminated because the children were “ laid off.” This does not mean necessarily that the children who held these positions were incompetent or troublesome, for children were often discharged because the work was temporary, because business was dull, because the employer failed or sold out his business, and for a variety of other reasons. On the other hand, 37.5 per cent of the positions terminated by continuation-school children and 37.8 per cent of those terminated by interviewed children were for some reason not satisfactory to the children themselves. Not all these positions were left voluntarily, for many children would not like to state that th^y had been di5^-jj charged and would complain instead of wages, or hours, or the kin^W of work, or would merely say that they disliked the work or the placd. The information as to reasons for leaving positions obtained from the interviewed children is probably more accurate than that obtained from the continuation-school children. This greater degree of accuracy https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 217 INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. is doubtless reflected in the higher proportion of positions from which the children were “ laid off.” It is probably also reflected in the differ ences between the two groups in the proportions of positions left because the children disliked the work or the place and because they secured better, or merely other, places. Of the positions left by continuation-school children, 14.8 per cent, as compared with only 9.9 per cent of those left by interviewed children, were terminated because of dislike of the work or the place. On the other hand, only 7.3 per cent of those left by continuation-school children, as compared with 13.1 per cent of those left by interviewed children, were reported as terminated because better positions had been secured. The continuation-school record on this point was made when the child applied for a certificate, and, as he always had another position at that time, he evidently often gave his reason for hunting the new place, instead of the fact that he had it, as his reason for leaving his former position. The interviewed child, on the other hand, was questioned carefully to ascertain whether he had secured the new position before actually leaving the old one and, if he had done so, this fact, instead of his reasons for dissatisfaction, was given as the cause of leaving. a b l e 111. — Reason fo r leaving p osition , by sex; comparison o f positions held by children interviewed and by children in B oston continuation school. Regular positions held b y children in Boston continuation school. Both sexes. Boys. Girls. Regular positions held b y children interviewed (Boston). Both sexes. B oys. Reason for leaving position. N um ber. Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent N um dis dis dis ber. ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. A ll positions................. 7,381 4,134 3,247 Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent dis dis dis ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. 1,943 1,093 Positions ieft............................. 3,324 100.0 1,742 100.0 1,582 100.0 1,136 100.0 Reason for leaving: Laid off.............................. 1,264 Position not satisfactory.................................. 1,245 Disliked work or place........................ 491 Low wages------- i___ 283 W ork too hard or hours long............. 230 Secured better position....................... 241 Continuation school___ 49 194 Returned to school........ Other reasons................... 455 ^ N ot em ployed1................ 117 • __ Positions not left or reason not reported......................... 4,057 850 627 100.0 509 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 100.0 38.0 476 27.3 788 49.8 483 42.5 231 36.8 252 49.5 37.5 807 46.3 438 27.7 429 37.8 262 41.8 167 32.8 14.8 8.5 315 132 18.1 7.6 176 151 11.1 9.5 112 93 9.9 8.2 64 46 10.2 7.3 48 47 9.4 9 .2 6.9 174 10.0 j . 56 7.3 1.5 5 .8 13.7 3 .5 186 31 127 264 37 10.7 1.8 7.3 15.2 2.1 ._ 2,392 55 18 67 191 80 1,665 3.5 75 6.6 51 8.1 24 4.7 3 .5 1.1 4.2 12.1 5.1 149 25 20 179 13.1 2 .2 1.8 15.8 101 16 13 105 16.1 2.6 2.1 16.7 48 9 7 ' 74 9.4 1.8 1.4 14.5 807 466 1 Em ployer did not keep promise of employment or child decided not to take position. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 15 Girls. 341 218 TH E W ORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. In one respect, the group of children interviewed is not typical o f . all children who left school to go to work, for it contains an a bnorm ally^ small proportion of children who left positions in order to return to V school. This was natural in view of the fact that these children were all at work on the date of the interview; but it may be due in part to the fact that children who went to work soon after becoming 14, as so large a proportion of these children did, were less likely to return to school than were children who did not go to work, until later. Both groups of children worked during school term before they were 16; that is, neither group included children who were merely vacation workers, but it may be that the continuation-school group included some children who went to work with the distinct intention of return ing to school within a short time. Girls were much more likely than boys to be “ laid off.” If the cases in which the reason for leaving was not reported are disregarded, as is done in Table 111, about half, 49.5 per cent, of the positions left by girls who were interviewed and practically the same proportion, 49.8 per cent, of those left by girls for whom continuation-school records were used were terminated for this reason. Only a little over one-third, 36.8 per cent, of those held by boys who were inter viewed, and a decidedly smaller proportion, only 27.3 per cent, of those held by boys for whom continuation-school records were used were terminated for this reason. The differences between the per centages for the two groups of boys may indicate that the boys more often than the girls admitted that they had been laid off only when closely questioned. A much larger proportion of the positions held by girls than of those held by boys, however, were for temporary work, particularly in mercantile establishments. Table 112 shows that although from only one-fifth, 20.4 per cent, of the positions left by boys the children were laid off because the work was temporary, because business was dull, or for reasons not assigned, this group of causes accounted for the termination of nearly two-fifths, 38.7 per cent, of the positions left by girls. At the same time it accounted for about seven-tenths, 69.4 per cent, of all the positions from which children were “ laid off.” Twenty-five children, 16 boys and 9 girls, stated to bureau agents that they had lost positions because they had been obliged to attend continuation school. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 219 INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES, //T y a b l e 112. Reason / o r leaving position , by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed. £ Regular positions. Fathers foreign-bom. A ll children. Both fathers and children native. Reason for leaving position and sex. N um ber. Both sexes...................... Per cent dis tribu tion. . 1,943 Boys........................... |............. Per cent dis tribu tion. 998 426 60 272 100.0 598 100.0 268 100.0 32 41.3 114 41.9 258 43.1 98 36.6 13 28.6 83 30.5 184 30.8 61 22.8 7 5.5 7.2 36.7 9.6 1.1 7.9 6.4 11.6 2.1 1.7 15.3 2.9 11 20 98 32 4 13 24 25 5 3 45 7 187 4.0 7.4 36.0 11.8 1.5 4 .8 8.8 9 .2 1.8 1.1 16.5 2.6 33 41 226 55 8 56 35 72 12 11 74 17 400 5.5 6.9 37.8 9.2 1.3 9.4 5.9 12.0 2.0 1.8 12.4 2 .8 18 19 93 23 1 24 14 31 7 6 54 10 158 6.7 7.1 34.7 8.6 .4 9.0 5 .2 11.6 2.6 2.2 20.1 3.7 2 4 12 2 1,093 646 N um ber. 100.0 272 _________ Positions left2................................... ... Reason for leaving: Laid off.......................................... Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given.. Business sold out or employer failed.................................... For other reasons.................... Position not satisfactory............... Disliked work or place........... No advancement.................... Low wages............................. . Work too hard, hours long___ Secured better position.......... Continuation school...................... Returned to school...................... . Other reasons................ ......... ... Not reported................................. Positions not left................................ . Per cent dis tribu tion. 459 - Positions left2............... ........... . 1,170 Reason for leaving: Laid off............ .................. . 483 Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given. . 335 Business sold out or employer failed................................... 64 For other reasons................... 84 Position not satisfactory.............. 429 Disliked work or place.......... 112 No advancement................... 13 Low wages............................. 93 Work too hard, hours long... 75 Secured better position......... 136 Continuation school..................... 25 Returned to school...................... 20 / Other reasons............................... 179 Not reported................................. 34 ositions not left................................ 773 N um ber. Children native. N ativity of Children foreign-born. father not report Per ed: chil N um cent dis dren ber. tribu na tion. tive.1 100.0 155 579 100.0 342 129 6 28 200 100.0 2 8 1 42 100.0 20 231 35.8 46 29.7 136 39.8 42 32.6 7 132 20.4 24 15.5 86 25.1 20 15.5 2 41 58 262 64 10 46 51 91 16 13 105 19 447 6.3 9.0 40.6 9.9 1.5 7.1 7.9 14.1 2.5 2.0 16.3 2.9 7 15 69 19 3 9 17 21 3 4.5 9.7 44.5 12.3 1.9 5 .8 11.0 13.5 1.9 20.6 3.2 6.4 8.2 39.8 9.9 1.8 7.6 6.1 14.3 2.6 2.3 12.9 2.6 10 12 48 9 1 11 11 16 3 5 26 5 71 7.8 9 .3 37.2 7.0 .8 8.5 8.5 12.4 2 .3 3 9 20.2 3.9 2 3 9 2 32 5 117 22 28 136 34 6 26 21 49 9 8 44 9 237 Girls........................................... 850 Positions left2. ..................................... Reason for leaving: Laid off................... .................... Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given... Business sold out or employer failed.............................. . F or other reasons.................... Position not satisfactory............... Disliked work or place............ No advancement..................... Low wages............................... ^ Work too hard, hours long.... ' Secured better position.......... Continuation school...................... Returned to school........................ Other reasons................................. Not reported.................................. Positions not left.............................. 524 100.0 187 117 419 100.0 256 139 3 22 226 100.0 2 5 1 18 100.0 12 252 48.1 68 58.1 122 47.7 56 40.3 6 203 38.7 59 50.4 98 38.3 41 29.5 5 23 26 167 48 3 47 24 45 9 7 74 15 326 4.4 5.0 31.9 9.2 .6 9.0 4.6 8.6 1.7 1.3 14.1 2.9 4 5 29 13 1 4 7 4 2 3 13 2 70 3.4 4.3 24.8 11.1 .9 3.4 6.0 3.4 1.7 2.6 11.1 1.7 11 13 90 21 2 30 14 23 3 3 30 8 163 4.3 5.1 35.2 8.2 .8 11.7 5.5 9.0 1.2 1.2 11.7 3.1 8 7 45 14 5 .8 5.0 32.4 10.1 1 3 13 3 15 4 1 28 5 87 9.4 2 .2 10.8 2.9 .7 20.1 3.6 3 3 6 1 Rate not shown where base is less than 50. “ Not reported’ ’ is included under “ Positions left,” whereas in Table 111, which includes vfPS'“V(W <iren; the cases in which the reason for leaving was not reported were com bined with those in which the position had not been left. F https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 220 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Complaint of too hard work or too long hours, according to t h ^ same table, accounted for the termination of 6.4 per cent of all the^ positions held by interviewed children, 7.9 per cent of those held by boys, and only 4.6 per cent of those held by girls. In other words, in about one-sixth of all the cases in which positions were not satis factory the reason given was that the physical demands were exces sive. Although the large proportion of girls who. were “ laid off” means smaller proportions who left positions for all other reasons, it is natural that excessive physical demands should be mentioned more frequently by boys than by girls, for boys are more frequently employed for comparatively heavy work. It was given in a larger proportion of cases, 8.8 per cent, by native children of native fathers than by either native children of foreign-born fathers, 5.9 per cent, or foreign-bom children, 5.2 per cent. Both groups of native children showed larger proportions of posi tions from which the children were laid off because the work was temporary, because business was dull, or for some unassigned reason than did the foreign-born children. The percentages for both sexes were 30.5, 30.8, and 22.8, respectively, and they were considerably larger for girls than for boys. Over half, 50.4 per cent, of the posi tions left by native girls whose fathers also were native were termimated for one of these reasons, as compared with 38.3 per cent of those left by native girls whose fathers were foreign-born and with 29.5 per cent of those left by foreign-born girls. These differences were doubtless due entirely to the differences to be discussed later in the occupations entered by the three nativity groups. Native boys whose fathers also were native appear to have left because their positions were not satisfactory more frequently than did native boys whose fathers were foreign born, and the latter ter minated their positions more frequently for this reason than did foreign-born boys. Of all positions left by the first group 44.5 per cent, of those left by the second 39.8 per cent, and of those left by the third 37.2 per cent were ended because they were considered unsatisfactory. Because of the large proportion of girls of native parentage who were laid off, other reasons were given less frequently by girls of this group. Dissatisfaction with their positions was given as a reason for leaving by less than one-fourth, 24.8 per cent, of them, as compared with over one-third, 35.2 per cent, of the native girls whose fathers were foreign-born and with nearly one-third, 32.4 per cent, of the foreign-born girls. The frequency with which native girls of native parentage were laid off also accounts for the fact that in so few cases, only 3.4 pe cent, as compared with 9 per cent for native girls of foreign parentage and 10.8 per cent for foreign-born girls, were they able to leave one position because they had secured another which they believed to be https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 221 INDUSTRIAL HISTORIES. V T a b l e 113 — Reason fo r leaving position , by retardation and sex o f child; regular posi tions held by children interviewed. Regular positions held b y children who, on leaving school, had completed for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Reason for leaving position and sex. A higher grade than normal. N um ber. Both sexes............................ Positions left.................................. Reason for leaving: Laid off.................................... W ork temporary, business dull-, or reason not given. Business sold out or em ployer failed................... For other reasons.............. Position not satisfactory......... Disliked work or place.. .. N o advancement....... Low wages................. Work too hard, hours long, Secured better position.. Continuation school............ . Returned to school................ Other reasons......................... Not reported.......................... Positions not left.......................... Boys................................... Positions left................................ Reason for leaving: Laid off.................................. Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given. Business sold out or em ployer failed.................. For other reasons............. Position not satisfactory........ Disliked work or place__ No advancement.............. Low wages........................ Work too hard, hours long. Secured better position... Continuation school................ Returned to school................. Other reasons.......................... Not reported............................ Positions not left..................... Girls..................................... Positions left.................................. Reason for leaving: Laid off...... ............................. Work temporary,business •dull, or reason not given. Business sold out or em ployer failed................... For other reasons.............. Position not satisfactory......... Disliked work or place___ No advancement.............. Low wages........................ Work too hard, hours long. Secured better position... Continuation school....... ........ Returned to school................. Other reasons......................... Not reported........................... Positions not left........................... Per cent dis- N um triber. bution. Total. Per cent dis- N um triber. bution. One or two grades lower than normal. Per Per cent cent dis- N um distriher. , tribubution. tion. Three or more grade, lower than normal. ber. N ot report- trition.i 307 923 687 602 85 26 177 100.0 533 100.0 444 100.0 392 100.0 52 100.0 16 79 44.6 232 43.5 167 37.6 154 39.3 13 25.0 5 62 35.0 171 32.1 99 22.3 89 22.7 10 19.2 3 6 11 60 17 3 7 14 19 4 7 19 8 130 3.4 6.2 33.9 9.6 1.7 4.0 7.9 10.7 2.3 4.9 10.7 4.5 27 34 177 49 4 33 28 63 15 7 85 17 390 5.1 6.4 33.2 9.2 .8 6.2 5.3 11.8 2.8 1.3 15.9 3.2 29 39 186 46 6 51 33 50 6 6 70 9 243 6.5 8.8 41.9 10.4 1.4 11.5 7.4 11.3 1.4 1.4 15.8 2.0 26 39 160 41 6 46 26 41 5 4 60 9 210 6.6 9.9 40.8 10.5 1.5 11.7 6.6 10.5 1.3 1.0 15.3 2.3 181 510 101 100.0 385 281 100.0 344 254 100.0 226 100.0 3 5.8 2 26 5 50.0 9.6 6 5 7 9 1 2 10 9.6 13.5 17.3 1.9 3.8 19.2 10 17 28 100.0 10 97 34.5 95 37.4 90 39.8 5 27 26.7 57 20.3 48 18.9 44 19.5 4 4 6 41 9 3 4 9 16 4 5 il 3 80 15 4.0 25 5.9 114 40.6 34 8.9 2 3.0 18 4.0 18 8.9 42 15.8 9 4.0 4 5.0 49 10.9 » 8 3.0 229 5.3 8.9 40.6 12.1 .7 6.4 6.4 14.9 3.2 1.4 17.4 2.8 20 27 103 21 5 23 24 30 3 4 41 8 131 7.9 10.6 40.6 8.3 2.0 9.1 9.4 11.8 1.2 1.6 16.1 3.1 19 27 89 18 5 22 19 25 3 2 34 8 118 8.4 11.9 39.4 8.0 2.2 9.7 8.4 11.1 1.3 .9 15.0 3.5 76 100.0 5 41 36.6 126 2 4 33 37 2 1 2 14 3 4 1 5 5 3 1 2 7 4 13 413 302 258 44 9 252 100.0 190 100.0 160 100.0 24 100.0 6 42 55.3 135 53.6 72 37.9 64 38.6 8 3 35 46.1 114 45.2 51 26.8 45 27.1 6 3 2 5 19 8 2.6 6.6 25.0 10.5 3 5 3 3.9 6.6 3.9 2 8 5 50 2.6 10.5 6.6 12 9 63 15 2 15 10 21 6 3 36 9 161 4.8 3.6 25.0 6.0 .8 6.0 4.0 8.3 2.4 1.2 14.3 3.6 9 12 83 25 1 28 9 20 3 2 29 1 112- 4.7 6,3 43.7 13.2 .5 14.7 4.7 10.5 1.6 1.1 15.3 .5 7 12 71 23 1 24 7 16 2 2 26 1 92 4.2 7.2 42.8 13.9 .6 14.5 4.2 9.6 1.2 1.2 15.7 .6 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A normal grade. 1 2 12 2 2 4 2 4 1 i 3 i 20 i 222 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. more satisfactory. In this boys appear to have been much morey^ successful than girls, native boys whose fathers also were native some-\] what less so than native boys whose fathers were foreign-born, but both more so than foreign-born boys. For in 13.5 per cent of the cases in which native boys of native parentage left positions they had previously secured employment elsewhere, whereas for native boys of foreign parentage this percentage was 14.3 and for foreignbom boys 12.4. Children from higher grades than normal, doubtless because of the particular type of occupations entered by the girls of this group as will be seen later,83 were somewhat more likely than children from normal grades and decidedly more likely than retarded children, according to Table 113, to be laid off. Children from higher grades were laid off in 44.6 per cent, those from normal grades in 43.5 per cent, and those from grades lower than normal in only 37.6 per cent of all cases in which they left positions. That this was due primarily at least to the occupations entered by girls is suggested by the fact that retarded boys were laid off in a larger proportion of cases,3 7.4 per cent, than advanced boys, 36.6 per cent, or than normal boys, 34.5 per cent. Retarded girls, on the'other hand, were laid off from only 37.9 per cent of their posi tions— about the same proportion as boys of this group— as com pared with 53.6 per cent of the positions held by normal girls and 55.3 per cent of those held by advanced girls. The advanced and normal children, as already pointed out,84 received higher initial wages and more wage advances than did the retarded children. It is, therefore, not surprising to find that retarded children were more likely than the other two groups to leave positions because of low wages. Not far from one-eighth, 11.5 per cent, of the positions left by retarded children, as compared with only 4 per cent of those left by children who had completed higher grades than normal and 6.2 per cent of those from normal grades, were terminated for this reason. The differences between advanced, normal, and retarded girls, as regards termination of position on account of low wages, though showing the same tendency, were more marked than the differences between the same groups of boys. 83 See Table 122, pp . 248-249 and Table 135, pp. 282-283. 14 See Table 98, p. 199 and Table 102, p . 203. \ https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 223 IN D U S T R IA L H ISTO R IE S. ftT a b l e 114.— Reason fo r leaving position, by steadiness at work and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed. Regular positions held b y children of specified steadiness at work.1 Class B (active). Reason for leaving regular positions and sex. Class A Per (steady). N um cent distri ber. bution. Positions held by both sexes... Positions left........................................ Reason for leaving: Laid off..................................? ___ Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given__ Business sold out or employer failed.......................... . . . . . . For other reasons................... Position not satisfactory............... Disliked work or place........... No advancement.................... Low wages.............................. Work too hard, horns lon g ... Secured better position.......... Continuation school...................... Returned to school........................ Other reasons................................ Not reported................................. Positions not left................................. 190 438 Class C (restless). N um ber. 896 Per cent distri bution. 328 644 90 37.2 266 45.3 62 25.6 183 32.5 100.0 Class E (inde termi nate). 91 100.0 100.0 180 262 Positions left.............................. . Reason for leaving: Laid off.......................................... Work temporary, business dull, or reason not given__ Business sold out or employer failed.................................... For other reasons.................... Position not satisfactory............... Disliked work or place........... No advancement.................... Low wages.............................. Work too hard, hours lon g ... Secured better position.......... Continuation school...................... Returned to school........................ Other reasons................................ Not reported___'............... ........... Positions not left................................. 143 100.0 46 32.2 136 29 20.3 76 Positions held b y girls.................. N um ber. 242 Positions held by boys.............. Positions left............................................ Reason for leaving: Laid off.................................................. W ork temporary, business dull, or reason not given___ Business sold out or employer failed............................................ For other reasons........................ Position not satisfactory................. Disliked work or place............. N o advancement........................ Low wages.................................... W ork too hard, hours lo n g .. . Secured better position............ Continuation school........................... Returned to school............................ y Other reasons.....................,,................ N ot reported......................................... Positions not left........................................ Per cent distri bution. Class D (unsteady). 502 100.0 16.5 7.9 82 394 33 100.0 100.0 100.0 44.4 45.9 56.3 37.8 45.9 33.3 107 4.0 16.2 77 34 1 Class A consists of children who each held during work histories of 1 year or more 1 position only; class B consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 for every 6 months and more than 1 for every 12 months of their work histones; class C consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate less than 1 position for every 3 months and more than 1 for every 6 months of their work histories; class D consists of children who held on an average new positions at a rate more than 1 position for every 3 months of their work histories; class E consists of children who each held a single posi tion which had not terminated at the end of a work history record of less than 1 year’ s duration. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 224 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The children of the four different groups, the “ steady,” “ active,^“ restless,” and “ unsteady” workers, showed decided differences in their reasons for leaving. Table 114 shows that all but 10 of the 190 positions held by “ steady” children were still held at the date of the interview. For this group of children, therefore, the number of posi tions left is entirely too small to justify any conclusion. But the “ unsteady” workers showed a greater tendency to be laid off than the “ restless” workers, and the latter than the “ active” workers. From 45.3 per cent of the positions left by “ unsteady” workers they were laid off; while the corresponding percentage for “ restless” workers was 41.3, and for “ active” workers oiily 37.2. On the other hand, 41.3 per cent of the positions left by “ active” workers, as compared with 38 per cent of those left by “ restless” workers, and with only 30.3 per cent of those left by “ unsteady” workers, were terminated because for some reason the work was not satisfactory. Although “ low wages” was most frequently given as a cause of dissatisfaction by the “ unsteady” workers and least fre quently by the “ active” workers, this tendency was more than coun terbalanced by the greater tendency of the “ active ” workers to give other reasons, particularly the securing of a better position, why their positions were not satisfactory. About one-sixth, 16.5 per cent, of the positions left by “ active” workers, as compared with about one-ninth, 11.8 per cent, of those left by “ restless” and with only 7.3 per cent of those left by “ unsteady” workers, were termi nated because the children had secured new places, which they be lieved, at least, to be better. This greater tendency of children who changed their positions less frequently to secure new places before leaving the old may in part account for their smaller percentages already noted of time unemployed. The tendency as regards reasons for leaving positions was slightly different among the three groups of boys. As has been seen, boys were much less frequently laid off from their positions than were girls. But a larger proportion, 37.7 per cent, of positions terminated by “ restless” boys than by any other group were ended in this way. On the other hand, the “ unsteady ” girls showed decidedly the largest proportion, 56.3 per cent, of positions thus ended. Nearly two-fifths, 19.6 per cent, of the positions terminated by “ active” boys, as com pared with 13.6 per cent of those terminated by “ restless” and with 10.1 per cent by “ unsteady” boys were left because the boys had secured better positions. ^ The reasons for leaving positions, however, are so closely con nected with the character of the occupations that before any very satisfactory conclusions can be drawn from them it is necessary to consider what occupations were entered by the boys and girls of the different groups. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATIONS. . A thorough study of children’s occupations was not possible in connection with this inquiry, partly because of the wide variety of positions and the small number of children doing any one specific task. This condition is characteristic of any large city with diversi fied industries in which no one type of child-employing industry is largely represented, but practically all types are present. Another reason why no such study was attempted was because an investiga tion of that kind would necessarily involve careful descriptions of the work performed,85 and both physical and mental examinations of a large number of children to determine its effects, as well as a study of a variety of environmental conditions. It probably should also include the following up for a number of years of the group of children studied in order to secure information as to their physical and industrial histories. Such a thorough study of children’s occu pation s is much needed. For the purpose of tabulation, it was necessary to make a broad, general classification of the occupations engaged in by the children included in this study. No complete industrial classification was attempted, but so far as possible the occupations involving similar labor conditions were grouped together. The children classed as factory operatives, for example, were all engaged in typical manufac turing occupations. Those employed in factories but not engaged in actual production—f or example, messengers and labelers— were classed under the general heading, “ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods,” along with children from other types of estab lishments engaged in the same kind of work. Under “ factory and mechanical occupations,” however, “ factory operatives” were carefully distinguished from “ apprentices and help ers” in skilled trades; and under “ factory operatives” certain kinds of factories which employed unusually large numbers of children were distinguished from the others. The group “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods” was divided into five classes, “ office work,” “ cash and messenger work in department stores,” “ selling,” “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work,” ajjd “ messenger, errand, and delivery work.” The last two designa tions necessarily include positions in a wide variety of industries, ss A few tentative studies of work processes were made in order to estimate the difficulties involved, but not enough was done in this line to justify any conclusions, and these studies were not followed up b y physical examinations of the children. 225 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 226 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . which, though involving considerable variations in external circular^stances, possess essential likenesses in their more fundamental char\^ acteristics.86 Of all the positions held by children who took out certificates in the four cities of this survey, according to Table 115 about one-third, 33 per cent, were for factory and mechanical occupations, and not far from two-thirds, 63.5 per cent, for clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods. Only 3 per cent of these positions were for personal and domestic occupations. An even smaller proportion, 2.6 per cent, were for work, included under factory and mechanical occupations, as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades. 115.— Occupation, by sex o f child; com parison o f position s held by children in terviewed with those held by children in B oston continuation school and with those held by children issued certificates in fo u r cities. T able Per cent distribution: a A ll positions held by— Children issued certificates. Children in the Boston continua tion school. Occupation. Boston. A ll cities. Children inter•viewed (Boston). A Both Both Both Both Boys. Girls. Boys Girls. sexes. Boys. Girls. Boys. Girls. sexes. sexes. A ll occupations........... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Personal and domestic oc cupations.............................. Personal service (other than servants in the h om e).......................... House and home work. Factory and mechanical occupations.............. Factory operativ« Shoe factory. C lothing factory and other needle trades.................. Textile m ill.......... Candy factory___ Other factory____ Apprentice and helperskilled trades............ Clerical occupations, wrap ping, selling, and d (' ‘ of goods..................... Office w o r k . . .. . Cash and messenger work — department store...................... — Packing, wrapping, la beling, and shipping room w ork.............. Selling.......................... Messenger work, e rand, and delivery . A ll other occupations... Not reported...................... 4.6 3.5 30.3 29.0 12.8 10.2 6.3 3.0 2.2 3.9 3.0 2.2 4.1 2.7 2.1 3.6 2.0 1.0 2.1 .2 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.1 2.0 .2 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.1 1.9 .2 1.3 2.3 33.0 30.4 8.9 20.7 16.6 5.3 48.9 48.3 13.5 33.6 31.0 10.4 20.5 16.5 6.3 49.9 49.3 15.7 31.1 29.0 10.1 16.9 13.6 5.5 49.2 48.6 15.9 5.8 3.0 .8 11.8 .6 1.6 .4 8.8 12.7 4.9 1.4 15.8 6 .8 3.5 .8 9.4 .7 1.9.3 7.2 14.5 5.5 1.3 12.2 7.2 3.2 .7 7.8 .6 1.7 .2 5.6 15.7 5.1 1.2 10.6 2.6 4.0 •6 2.6 4.1 .7 2.1 3.3 .5 1.3 2.3 63.5 7.3 76.2 9.4 47.0 4.6 62.8 7.4 76.4 9.6 45.8 47 65.8 6 .0 80.4 7.8 47.2 3.7 64.2 6.2 79.8 6.7 12.4 8.6 17.3 14.0 9.6 19.5 143 7.1 23.4 11.0 5.0 6 .8 4.1 2 .4 4.1 12.4 4.3 4.8 4.0 2.0 3.8 8.3 4.1 44 2.9 1.5 2.5 ao 3.3 32.8 .5 51.7 .8 8.3 .1 32.7 .5 .1 51.4 .7 .1 9.2 .1 .1 38.3 .4 61.4 .6 as .1 15.1 100.0 6.0 49.8 49.8 15.3 20.8 3.6 2.2 7.8 18.6 8.2 3.9 -40. not shown where less than one-tenth of 1 per cent. s« The specific occupations included under each designation in the tables are shown in the Appendix, pp. 362 to 363. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCC U PA TIO N S. 227 ^ B e ca u se of differences in industrial opportunities the occupations [of the children who took out certificates in Boston alone differed somewhat from those of the children who took out certificates in the four cities combined. A slightly larger proportion of the positions in Boston than of those in the four cities combined was found in the group of factory and mechanical occupations and a slightly smaller proportion in that of clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods. Of the Boston positions 10.4 per cent, as com pared with only 8.9 per cent of the positions in the four cities, were for work as operatives in shoe factories. Boston led also in the pro portions of positions in clothing factories and in textile mills. The only other differences worthy of note between the occupational dis tribution of positions held by children in Boston and in the four cities combined are the larger proportion in Boston, 14 per cent as com pared with 12.4 per cent, of positions for cash and messenger work in department stores, and the smaller proportion in Boston, 4.8 per cent as compared with 6.8 per cent, of positions for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work. None of these differences, how ever, is sufficiently significant to invalidate the Boston figures alone as representative, in general, of the occupational distribution of children’s positions in the larger industrial unit. In the figures based on the continuation-school records a new feature enters, for the children in this group had all left school for work, whereas a considerable number of those in the certificate record group worked only during vacations. The differences in occupational distribution of vacation and regular positions, however, will be considered later. Here it is necessary to state only that a smaller proportion of the positions held by the continuation-school children, 31.1 per cent, were for work in factory and mechanical occupations, and a larger proportion, 65.8 per cent, for work in clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods, and that a similar difference was found in the positions held by the chil dren interviewed. The information in regard to occupations for the certificate and continuation school groups of children was obtained from the promises of employment signed by employers and brought to the certificate office by the children. Only certificated positions, therefore, were included. The occupation designations given on the promises of employment were often vague and sometimes inaccurate. In one establishment, at least, most of the promises of employment were ade out for one occupation, though children were employed in a umber of different processes. To a considerable extent, however, the broad groups into which the occupations are classified prevent these inaccuracies from causing errors in the conclusions. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 228 T TTF1 , W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . For the children interviewed the information was secured by quesy^ tioning the child as to the occupations in which he had been actually^ engaged, and uncertificated as well as certificated positions were included. Nevertheless the differences between the proportions of positions held in the different occupations by the children for whom continuation-school records were used and by those who were inter viewed are slight. A larger proportion of the latter positions than of the former, 4.6 per cent as compared with 2.7 per cent, were for personal and domestic occupations— a difference which is probably accounted for by the inclusion for the interviewed children of uncer tificated positions. The same fact may account for the somewhat larger proportion, 9.5 per cent as compared with 7.2 per cent, of positions in clothing factories and other needle trades among those held by the children who were interviewed. On the other hand the smaller proportion, 1.3 per cent as compared with 2.1 per cent, of positions as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades is probably due to more accurate description by the children of the actual work per formed. It is safe to say that the information as to occupations obtained from the children is considerably more accurate than that obtained from the promises of employment. As to the representative character of the schedule data concerning occupations the differences between the two groups are so slight that it seems safe to assume that, with one exception, the children inter viewed are typical in their occupations of all the working children of Boston. This one exception is in positions for cash and messenger work in department stores. At the time of this study continuationschool classes were conducted in a number of large department stores in Boston, but no children from these classes were interviewed. As a result the schedule group includes none of the children who were employed in any of these large stores at the time the schedule study was made. To a limited extent, moreover, this omission probably diminished the proportion of interviewed children employed by de partment stores in their first positions, for some of the children may have held only one position and others may have merely gone from one of the big department stores to another. In regard to the children employed in the different occupations facts were secured which were designed to answer certain definite questions. To what extent, for example, do the occupations of boys differ from those of girls, or the occupations of foreign-born children from those of native children or those of native children of foreign parentage from those of native children of native parentage? Do the ages children at taking out their first certificates, their school. standing, or the methods by which they secured their positions affect the occupations they enter ? How do the occupations of vacation workers differ from those of children who have left school ? How frequently https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATIONS. 229 A Me occupations changed without change of position? How long ^ydo children work, and what are their hours and wages and increases in wages in the different occupations ? What reasons do they give for leaving positions involving the various kinds of work ? In con sidering the answers to all these questions it must, of course, be kept constantly in mind, not only that the occupations which these children could enter were limited by law, but that in many, if not most, cases they had no real choice but simply took the first position which they could secure without thought of “ picking and choosing.” SEX. The boys showed a greater tendency than did the girls to go into the group of occupations included under the general designation “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.” Of all the certificates taken out-for this group of occupations in the four cities, according to Table 116,88 67.8 per cent were for boys, although boys held only 56.5 per cent of the certificates taken out for all positions. The preponderance of boys in this group was due entirely to their employment in office work and in messenger, errand, and deliv e ry work. Nearly three-fourths, 72.7 per cent, of the certificates *eld by children for office work, and almost nine-tenths, 89 per cent, bf those held for messenger, errand, and delivery work were taken out by boys. The proportion of selling positions held by boys was nearly as high, 55.3 per cent, as the proportion of all positions, 56.5 per cent. Boys took out only about two-fifths, 39.3 per cent, of the certificates for cash and messenger work in department stores and only one-fifth, 20 per cent, of those for “ packing, wrapping, labeling,, and shipping-room work.” The girls, on the other hand, showed a greater tendency than did the boys, not only to go into cash and messenger work in department stores and into “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work, but also to become factory operatives. Nearly seven-tenths, 69.1 per cent, of the certificates held for work in factories were taken out by girls. They held about two-thirds, 66.2 per cent, of the shoe factory positions, over seven-tenths, 70.7 per cent, of those in textile mills, and nearly three-fourths, 73.9 per cent, of those in candy factories. The greatest preponderance of girls was found, however, in positions as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades, where they held nearly 19 out of every 20, 94.3 per cent, of all the Positions. In the entire group of factory and mechanical occupations, however, the preponderance of girls was less than in any of these bdivisions. This was due in part to the fact that they held a smaller proportion, only 58.1 per cent, of the positions in “ otherfactories.” But to a considerable extent it was due to the decided preponderance I p^359 fi^ures 011 the percentages given In this table are based will be found in Appendix Table https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . 230 of boys in positions as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades^ Only about one-tenth, 10.6 per cent, of the certificates held for work of this kind were taken out by girls. 1 1 6 .— S ex , by occu p a tion ; com parison o f p osition s held by children interview ed w ith those held b y children in B o sto n con tin u a tion school and w ith those held by children issued certificates in fo u r cities. T able Per c e n t1 of positions held by— Children issued certificates. Occupation. A ll cities. A ll occupations............................... Personal and domestic occupations.. . Personal service (other than ser vants in the home)........................ House and home w ork............. — Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative.............................. Shoe factory.............. ........ Clothing factory and other needle trades.......... ....... .. — Textile m ill.................................. Candy factory............ ................. Other factory.............................. Apprentice and helper— skilled tra d e s........................................... .. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.......... . Office w ork......................................... Cash and messenger work— de partment store.............................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room w ork................... Selling.................. ............................... Messenger work, errand and delivery............................................ Boston. Children in Boston continuation school. Children inter viewed (Bos ton). Girls. Boys. Girls. Boys. Girls. Boys. Girls. Boys. 56.5 43.5 55.6 44.4 56.0 440 56.3 57.4 40.5 59.5 42.6 57.4 42.7 59.3 8.8 35.4 30.9 33.8 40.7 91.3 64.6 69.1 66.2 58.1 9.9 34.0 29.5 33.4 41.9 90.1 66.0 70.5 66.6 65.3 8.6 30.5 26.3 30.5 347 91.4 69.5 73.7 69.5 28.1 24.9 34.7 71.9 75.1 65.3 5.7 29.3 2ft 1 41.9 94.3 70.7 73.9 58.1 5.7 30.4 24.0 42.5 94.3 69.6 76.0 57.5 4.3 30.1 95.7 69.9 4.3 41.5 95.7 58.5 4Ò.3 59.7 89.4 10.6 88.4 11.6 88.9 11.1 67.8 72.7 32.2 27.3 67.6 71.8 32.4 28.2 68.4 73.0 31.6 27.0 69.9 72.3 30.1 27.7 39.3 60.7 38.2 61.8 27.7 72.1 25.8 74.2 80.5 50.7 32.7 56.6 67.3 43.4 10.1 42.6 20.0 55.3 80.0 44.7 23.5 53.5 76.5 46.5 19.5 49.3 89.0 11.0 87.5 12.5 89.9 1 For the figures on which these percentages are based see Appendix Table I , p. 359. not shown where base is less than 50. 6Ì.7 11.5 The per cent is In personal and domestic occupations, also, more positions were held by girls than by boys. Girls held nearly three-fifths, 57.4 per cent, of all the certificates issued for these occupations and over nine-tenths, 91.3 per cent, of those issued for house and home work alone. In personal service other than servants in the home, they fell behind the boys, for only about two-fifths, 40.7 per cent, of these positions were held by girls. In the continuation school and schedule groups of children, as compared with the certificate group, even larger proportions of the positions in clerical and similar occupations— 68.4 per cent for the continuation school group and 69.9 per cent for the schedule grou p ^ were held by boys. At the same time larger proportions of the pos‘ tions in factory and mechanical occupations, 69.5 per cent and 71JH per cent for the two groups, respectively, were held by girls. Threefourths, 75.1 per cent, of the factory operative positions held by the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U PA TIO N S. 231 ¿children interviewed were filled by girls, but none of the girls in this Iroup appear to have been employed as apprentices or helpers in skilled trades. This may have been due to the more accurate classification of occupations made possible by the opportunity to question the child. In cash and messenger work in department stores, as in factory and mechanical occupations, both the continuation school and schedule groups of children showed higher proportions of girls, 72.1 per cent and 74.2 per cent, respectively, than did the certificate group, probably because of the fact that most of the large stores were in Boston, comparatively few of them being in Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea. For some reason a smaller proportion of the. positions for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work appear to have been held by girls in the group of children interviewed than in the entire continuation school group, 67.3 per cent as compared with 80.5 per cent, or than in the certificate group, 80 per cent. In all other occupa tions the group of children interviewed seems to resemble closely, in the distribution of the two sexes, the continuation school group, that is, practically the total number of regular workers who took out certificates in Boston. Tn spite of the preponderance of girls over boys in personal and omestic occupations, in cash and messenger work in department stores, and in “ packing, wrapping,labeling, and shipping-room w ork” nearly half, 48.3 per cent, of all the positions held by girls who took out certificates in the four cities, according to Table 115, were for work as operatives in factories. Only 17.3 per cent of them were for cash and messenger work in department stores, 12.4 per .cent for 'packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work,” and 3.9 per cent for personal and domestic occupations. The majority— 51.7 per cent of the positions held by boys, on the other hand, were for messenger, errand, and delivery work. It is evident that the girls tended to concentrate in factory work and the boys in what have been called the "fetching and carrying” jobs. NATIVITY AND FATHER’S NATIONALITY. The children born in the United States showed a greater tendency than the foreign-born children to enter clerical and similar occupa tions, and the foreign-born children showed a greater tendency to enter factory and mechanical occupations. Table 117 89 shows that over seven-tenths, 71.1 per cent, of all the native children taking out certificates in the four cities, as compared with less than ^-tenths, 59 per cent, of the foreign-born children, were first em ployed in clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods. On the other hand, little more than one-fourth, 26 per cent, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 232 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . of the native children as compared with considerably over one-j third, 36.1 per cent, of the foreign-born children held first positional in factory and mechanical occupations. Each occupation division within the clerical and similar occupa tions group, except “ selling,” and “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work,” showed a decidedly larger proportion of the native than of the foreign-born children. Nearly two-fifths, 39.6 per cent, of the native children, as compared with less than one-third, 31.3 per cent, of the foreign-born children, were first employed in mes senger work, errands, and the delivery of goods. Office work furnished first positions to 7.6 per cent of the native and only 4.8 per cent of the foreign-born children. Perhaps the most striking difference was found in cash and messenger work in department stores, in which 14.4 per cent of the native children and only 7.9 per cent of the foreign-born children were first employed. On the other hand, only 3.7 per cent of the native children, as compared with 7.5 per cent of the foreign-born children, were first employed in “ selling,” which generally meant work in small shops kept by foreign-born merchants or on peddlers’ wagons. These children were often employed by their parents or relatives. In spite of the comparative prevalence of this type of work among foreign-born children, theij general tendency was to enter the more mechanical occupation This general tendency doubtless accounts for the fact that 7.6 per cent of the foreign-born children, as compared with only 5.8 per cent of the native children, were employed in packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work. In the factory and mechanical occupations group the larger pro portion of all foreign bom than of all native children appears to be due mainly to the fact that 10.5 per cent of the foreign bom, as compared with only 3.7 per cent of the native children, were em ployed in clothing factories and other needle trades. More than one-fifth— 21.8 per cent— of the foreign-born girls, as compared with less than one-tenth— 9.2 per cent— of the native girls became operatives in factories of this kind. It is interesting to note also that a larger proportion of foreign born than of native children, 3 per cent as compared with 2 per cent, were first employed as appren tices and helpers in skilled trades; but this difference was entirely among the boys, for practically no foreign-born girls— and only a few native girls— were thus classified. Decided differences in occupational distribution were found between the children born in different foreign countries. Tho born in England and Wales, for example, appear to have fou' much the same occupations as the native children. The most interesting difference is that in the former group a considerably larger proportion, 5.4 per cent— all boys— were employed in their https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATIONS. 233 first positions as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades. Of the ^children born in British North America a smaller proportion than of the native children, 66.7 per cent as compared with 71.1 per cent, were employed in clerical and similar occupations and a larger pro portion, 5.2 per cent as compared with 2.5 per cent, in personal and domestic occupations. Of the other two principal nativity groups the Russian children were more like the native in the occupations first entered than were the Italian. For instance, only about one-third, 33.5 per cent, of the Russian children, as compared with not far from one-half, 46.1 per cent, of the Italian children, entered factory and mechanical occupa tions. Nearly two-thirds, 65 per cent, of the Russian children, as compared with not much more than two-fifths, 43.3 per cent, of the Italian children, entered clerical and similar occupations. A de cidedly larger proportion of the children in each of these groups, especially the Italian, than of the native children were first employed in clothing factories and other needle trades. Of the Russian chil dren nearly one-tenth, 9.2 per cent, and of the Italian over one-sixth, 17.6 per cent, as compared with only 3.7 per cent of the native children, entered this group of occupations. In “ selling,” too, both these groups showed decidedly larger proportions, 8.6 per cent and 11.1 per cent, respectively, than the native, only 3.7 percent. A partic ularly large proportion of the Italian boys, 13.2 per cent, sold goods in their first positions. Nearly as large a proportion of the Russian as of the native children, 6.6 per cent as compared with 7.6 per cent, but a very small proportion, only 1.5 per cent, of the Italian children began in office work. Comparatively few of the Italian children began their industrial lives in messenger, errand, and delivery work,, only 23.5 per cent as compared with 31.2 per cent of the Russian and 39.6 per cent of the native children. Finally, it is of interest to note that a much larger proportion of the Russian children than of the native, 11.7 per cent as compared with 5.8 per cent, were first em ployed in packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work, a group of occupations first entered by only 4.6 per cent of the Italian children. Many of the native children, however, were of foreign parentage, and Table 118, for the children interviewed, shows that, although in their occupational distribution these children tended to be more like the native children of native fathers than like the foreign-born children, they distinctly modified the tendencies shown by the children of native parentage. For instance, 23.5 per cent of all the positions held by native children whose fathers were also native, 29.6 per cent of those held by native children whose fathers were foreign bom , and 39.9 per cent of those held by foreign-bom children were for factory and mechanical occupations. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 16 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 234 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . T a b l e 117.— Occupation first entered, by country o f birth and sex; first positions held byk children issued certificates m fo u r cities. Per cent distribution:1 First positions held b y children issued certificates. Country of birth. Occupation first entered and sex. Foreign countries. Total. United States. Total. Both sexes...................................... Personal and domestic occupations.. Personal service (other than servants in the h om e)................ House and home work................... Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative.............................. Shoe factory.............. Clothing factory and other needle trades............................ Textile m ill.................................. Candy factory...... ....................... Other factory................. ............. Apprentice and helper, skilled trad e s..................................... ......... Clerical occupations, wrapping, sell ing, and delivery of goods................... Office work........................................... Cash and messenger work, de partment store................................ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work............. Selling.................................................... Messenger work, errand and de livery................................ ................. A ll other occupations............................... Not reported.............. ..................... ........... 100.0 100.0 2.8 2.5 1.9 .9 27.8 25.7 7.4 1.5 .9 26.0 24.0 7.5 5.0 2.4 .5 10.4 3.7 2.0 .5 10.3 100.0 Russia. Italy. Eng British North land Amer and ica. Wales. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 7.3 64.2 4 .8 9.0 27.9 22.5 7.2 3.6 3.6 1.8 2.1 2.0 68.9 7.1 71.1 7.6 65.0 6.6 43.3 1.5 13.2 14.4 6.9 2.5 18.0 6.1 4.4 5.8 3.7 38.1 .4 .1 39.6 .4 .1 31.2 23.5 1.5 37. i Boys........................ ......................... . 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Personal and domestic occupations... Personal service (other than servants in the hom e).................. House and home work.................... Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative............................. Shoe factory................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades.......................... . Textile m ill.................................. Candy factory............................ Other factory.............................. Apprentice and helper, skilled trades................................................ . Clerical occupations, wrapping, sell ing, sind delivery of goods................. Office work................. ...................... Cash and messenger work, de partment store.............................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work........... Selling................................................. Messenger work, errand and de livery........................................ — A ll other occupations............................. N ot reported.,........................................ ... 2.0 1.4 1.9 .1 16.1 12.9 3.8 1.3 .1 15.1 12.3 3.7 .3 1.4 .3 7.0 .2 1.3 .3 6.7 3.2 2.8 81.3 8.4 82.9 9.0 72.9 5.6 7.9 8.5 4.8 1.8 3.9 1.7 3.5 59.3 .6 .1 60.3 .5 .1 100.0 13.5 100.0 16.1 19.4 12.4 2.9 12.6 2.3 7.7 3.4 82.4 78.2 6.9 14.9 6.9 6.8 4.1 59.4 37.9 2.3 55.4 1 For the figures on which these percentages are based, see Appendix Table I I , p . 360. is not shown where base is less than 50 or where rate is less than one-tenth of 1 per cent. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Other. The per cent OCCUPATION'S. >T v ia b l e 'Z ô b 1 1 7 — Occupation first entered, by country o f birth and sex; first position s held by children issued certificates in fo u r cities— Concluded. Percent distribution: First positions held b y children issued certificates. Country of birth. Occupation first entered and sex. Foreign countries. Total. United States. Girls............................ Personal and domestic occupations.. Personal service (other than servants in the h om e)_______ House and home work.................... Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative.............................. Shoe factory............................... . Clothing factory and other needle trades............................ Textile m ill.........................j ____ Candy factory.............................. Other factory............................... Apprentice and helper, skilled trades.................................................. /Clerical occupations, wrapping, sell ing, and delivery of goods................... Office work........................................... Cash and messenger work, de partment store................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room w ork............. Selling................................ ................... Messenger work, errand and de livery.................................................. A ll other occupations............................... Not reported................................................ Total. Russia. Italy. Eng British land North and Amer Other. W ales. ica. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 4.0 4.2 3.5 2.2 5.4 1.3 1.9 2.0 2.2 43.4 42.8 13.5 1.6 1.8 53.2 53.0 10.3 .6 1.7 46.9 46.4 10.1 4.7 .7 63.8 63.8 8.7 1.3 50.0 50.0 6.4 9.2 3.1 0.9 16.1 21.8 6.2 1.2 13.6 17.3 7.8 36.2 3.4 2.0 13.4 17.9 6 .4 2.6 16.7 .6 .2 .6 50.3 5.1 52.2 5.5 43.1 3.9 50.8 5.6 30.2 2.0 48.7 2.6 21.1 23.8 11.3 9.5 4.7 14.1 12.6 12.3 4.1 13.8 8.8 19.0 12.3 8.1 8.7 16.7 7.7 6.5 .1 .1 5.3 .2 6.7 .7 7.7 2.2 45. 5 45.0 12.8 .5 5.1 11.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 The occupational distribution of the children whose fathers were foreign born but of English-speaking nationalities, however, includ ing children who were themselves foreign born, as appears in Table 119, was very similar to that of the children of native fathers. An even smaller proportion of the positions held by the boys whose fathers were foreign born of English-speaking nationalities than of those held by the sons of native fathers, 11.5 per cent as compared with 13.6 per cent, were for factory and mechanical occupations. But this was accompanied by a larger proportion of the positions held by girls, 46.7 per cent as compared with only 38 per cent of those held by the daughters of native fathers. The Irish boys and girls showed less tendency than the sons and daughters of other for eign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities to become facTy operatives. On the other hand, of the positions held by the children of fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities 38.5 per cent and of those held by the children of Italian fathers 46.6 per cent, were for factory https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TH E W ORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. 236 children showed and mechanical occupations. The Russian-Jewish Russian-Jewisii cmictren snowea^ even less tendency than the children of native fathers to b e c o m ^ l factory or mechanical workers, for of the positions held by the former only 21.4 per cent, as compared with 23.5 per cent of those held by the latter, belonged to this group. Although the same general tendencies are shown by the boys alone as by both sexes, they are most pronounced among the girls. Of the positions held by girls whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking national ities 56.8 per cent and of those held by Italian girls 62.7 per cent were for work as factory operatives, as compared with 38 per cent of those held by girls whose fathers were native and with only 37.3 per cent of those held by girls whose fathers were Russian Jews. T able 118.— Occupation, by nativity o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; regular posi tions held by children interviewed. Regular positions held b y children. Fathers foreign born. Both fathers and children native. Total. Occupation and sex. Children native. N ativity of fathers not reported; children Children native. foreign bom . Per Per Per Per Per cent N um cent cent cent N um cent N um N um dis dis dis dis dis ber. tribu ber. tribu ber. tribu ber. tribu ber. tribu tion. tion. 1 tion. tion. tion. B oth sexes.................................. . n,943 100.0 89 Personal and domestic occupations Personal service (other than servants 46 in the h o m e!........................................ 43 House and home work........... ............ 588 Factory and mechanical occupations— 563 Factory operative.................. ............... 199 Shoe factory..................................... Clothing factory and other needl 185 trades.............................................. 53 Textile m ill....................................... 19 Candy factory.................................. 107 Other factory............... ; . . . . ......... Apprentice and helper— s k i l l e d 25 trades..................................................... . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, 1,248 and delivery of goods.................... 101 Office work............. .................... Cash and messenger work—depart 213 m ent store.......................... - ................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and . 104 shipping-room work.............. 76 S e llin g ......................... . . 754 Messenger work, errand and de . 17 All other occupations....................... 23 5.0 2.4 2.2 30.3 29.0 10.2 5 18 108 103 44 1.1 3.9 23.5 22.4 9.6 9.5 2.7 1.0 5.5 27 14 3 15 5.9 3.1 .7 3.3 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 4.5 3.3 2.5 2.0 3.3 25.0 18.3 8.3 29.6 28.4 11.1 3.3 6.7 1.3 5 1.1 64.2 5.2 324 38 70.6 8.3 652 45 11.0 76 16.6 107 5.4 3.9 38.8 .9 14 10 186 4 3.1 2.2 40.5 .9 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Trending one position for which occupation was not reported. 100.0 426 459 100.0 4.6 65.3 4.5 229 13 53.8 3.1 24 5.6 71.7 8.3 237 OCCUPATIONS. able f 118.— Occupation, by n a tivity o f father, and nativity and sex o f child; regular p osition s held by children interviewed— Concluded. Regular positions held b y children. Total. Occupation and sex. N um ber. Girls r....................................................... Personal and domestic occupations.......... Personal service (other than servants in hom e)................................................. House and home w ork........................... Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative................................ Shoe factory............... *...................... Clothing factory and other needle trades................................................ Textile m ill........................................ Candy factory.. . .............................. Other factory..................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................ . Office work............................................... . Cash and messenger work—depart m ent store............................................ . Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work.......................... Selling...................................................... . , Messenger work, errand and delivery. 2 Including 272 100.0 38 3.5 4 Children native. N ativity of fathers not reported; Children children foreign born. native. 35 3 165 140 69 3.2 .3 15.1 12.8 6.3 8 22 41 .7 2.0 3.8 5 8 2 579 100.0 200 100.0 1.5 23 4.0 11 4 1.5 3.5 .5 14.9 12.8 6.2 5.5 13.6 11.8 7.0 20 3 86 74 36 11 37 32 19 34 30 10 17.0 15.0 5.0 1.8 2.9 4 15 19 .7 ' 2.6 3.3 4 2 14 2.0 1.0 7.0 42 8 4 4 25 2.3 5 1.8 12 2.1 4 2.0 4 79.8 6.7 227 31 83.5 11.4 464 27 80.1 4.7 147 10 73.5 5.0 34 5 55 5.0 20 7.4 29 5.0 5 2.5 1 34 43 667 17 3.1 3.9 61.0 1.6 2 5 169 4 .7 1.8 62.1 1. 5 22 22 364 5 3.8 3 .8 62.9 .9 10 16 106 8 5.0 8.0 53.0 4.0 850 100.0 187 100.0 419 100.0 100.0 5.5 872 73 226 100.0 28 18 51 6.0 19 10.2 22 5.3 8 3.5 2 11 40 423 423 130 1.3 4.7 49.8 49.8 15.3 1 18 71 71 25 .5 9.6 38.0 38.0 13.4 5 17 209 209 75 1.2 4.1 49.9 49.9 17.9 5 3 136 136 29 2.2 1.3 60.2 60.2 12.8 2 7 7 1 177 31 19 66 20.8 3.6 2.2 7 .8 27 9 3 7 14.4 4.8 1.6 3.7 76 14 8 36 18.1 3.3 1.9 8.6 72 8 6 21 31.9 3.5 2.7 9.3 2 376 28 44.2 3.3 97 7 51.9 3.7 188 18 44.9 4.3 82 3 36.3 1.3 9 158 18.6 56 29.9 78 18.6 19 8.4 5 70 33 87 8.2 3.9 10.2 12 5 17 6.4 2.7 9.1 30 11 51 7.2 2.6 12.2 26 17 17 11.5 7.5 7.5 2 one position for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Fathers foreign born. Per Per Per Per Per cent cent cent cent cent N um N um Num N um disdisdisdis disber. ber. ber. ber. tributributributribùtribution. tion. tion. tion. tion. B oys.......................................................... «1,093 100.0 Personal and domestic occupations.......... Personal service (other than servants in the h om e).......................................... House and home w ork........................... Factory and mechanical occupations— Factory operative................................... Shoe factory........... ........................... Clothing factory and other needle trades................................................ Textile m ill........................................ Other factory............................... .. Apprentice and helper— s k i l l e d tra d e s..................................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................. Office work................................................. Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store.............................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work............................ Selling.......................................................... Messenger work, errand and delivery. A ll other occupations..................................... Both fathers and children native. 2 2 2 100.0 T able . 119.— Occupation, by nationality o f father, and sex o f child; regular positions held by interviewed children o f foreign-born fathers. __________ ______ _ . , . ........................ bO' ......... -................. 00 Regular positions held b y children of foreign-born fathers— O f English-speaking nationalities. O f non-English-speaking nationalities. Total. Total. Occupation and sex. Per N um cent distriber. button. Per cent N um distriber. button. Other. Per N um cent distriber. button. Per N um cent ber. distribution. B oth sexes.................................................... i l,4 2 4 100.0 574 100.0 382 100.0 192 100.0 845 Personal and domestic occupations................ Personal service (other than servants in the home)...................................................... House and home w ork................................. Factory and mechanical occupations............ Factory operative......................................... Shoe factory............................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades...................................................... Textile m ill............................................ . Candy factory...................... .................. 64 4.5 24 4.2 17 4 .5 7 3.6 40 41 23 465 449 150 2.9 1.6 32.7 31.5 10.5 9 15 140 135 65 1.6 2.6 24.4 23.5 11.3 7 10 83 82 38 1.8 2.6 21.7 21.5 9 .9 2 5 57 53 27 1.0 2.6 29.7 27.6 14.1 156 39 14 90 16 11.0 2.7 1.0 6 .3 1.1 25 20 4.4 3.5 19 13 5 .0 3.4 6 7 3.1 3.6 25 5 4.4 ,9 12 1 3.1 .3 13 4 1 881 58 61.9 4.1 402 .26 70.0 4.5 278 16 72.8 4 .2 131 9 .2 \ 6 .2 Apprentice and helper— skilled trades.. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery o f goods........................................... Office w ork....................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store................................................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping room work.................................. Selling................................................................. Messenger work, errand and d elivery.. . A ll other occupations........................................... N ot reported................................................ ........... B oys...........................................i ................... https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 88 66 1538 13 1 1779 Italian. Total. Per N um cent distriber. bution. Russian Jewish. Per N um cent distriber. bution. Other. Per N um cent distriber. bution. Per cent distribution. 485 100.0 192 100.0 168 100.0 4.7 28 5.8 7 3.6 5 3.0 32 8 325 314 85 3.8 .9 38.5 37.2 10.1 26 2 226 221 55 5.4 .4 46.6 45.6 11.3 4 3 41 37 10 2.1 1.6 21.4 19.3 5.2 2 3 58 56 20 1.2 1.8 34.5 33.3 11.9 15.5 2.2 1.7 7.7 1.3 100 11 12 43 5 20.6 2.3 2.5 8.9 1.0 16 1 8.3 .5 6.8 2.1 131 19 14 65 11 10 4 5.2 2.1 15 7 2 12 2 8.9 4.2 1.2 7.1 1-2 124 10 64.6 5.2 474 32 56.1 3 .8 226 11 46.6 2.3 143 11 74.5 5.7 105 10 62.5 6 .0 100.0 . 80 13.9 59 15.4 21 10.9 51 6.0 18 3.7 13 6 .8 20 11.9 4 .2 1.2 46.2 1.2 .2 21 7 175 3 1 5.5 1.8 45.8 .8 .3 3 1.6 90 4 46.9 2.1 64 59 268 6 7.6 7.0 31.7 .7 33 31 133 5 6 .8 6.4 27.4 1.0 26 20 73 1 13.5 10.4 38.0 .5 5 8 62 3 .0 4 .8 36.9 .1 24 7 265 7 1 m o 364 100.0 239 100.0 125 100.0 410 100.0 201 100.0 117 92 100.0 4 .6 37.8 .9 m o \ TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. N um ber. Irish. I Personal and domestic occupations................ Personal service (other than servants in the home)....................................................... House and home w ork................................. Factory and mechanical occupations............ Factory operative........................................... Shoe factory.............................................. Clothing factory and other needle tra d e s..................................................... Textile m ill............................................... 3.2 25 6.1 18 9 .0 4 3.4 3 3 .3 1.6 1.6 17.6 14.4 7.2 24 1 78 67 25 5.9 .2 19.0 16.3 6.1 18 9.0 4 3.4 8.4 7.9 5 .0 2 2 22 18 9 48 43 15 23.9 21.4 7 .5 13 9 3 11.1 7.7 2.6 2 1 17 15 7 2 .2 1.1 18.5 16.3 7 .6 4.0 3 .2 3 .2 2 .0 1.7 6 .6 2 .7 7 2 . 19 5 3 .5 1.0 9 .5 2 .5 .9 5 4 4 8 7 27 11 1 2.1 .8 .4 5 4 4 .3 3 .4 5 3 2 5 .4 3.3 2.2 87.9 5.4 95 7 76.0 5.6 301 17 73.4 4.1 130 6 64.7 3 .0 99 5 84.6 4 .3 72 6 78.3 6 .5 4 4 3.4 4 4.3 7 12 71 1 6.0 10.3 60.7 .9 2 5 55 2.2 5.4 59.8 4.4 9 2.5 5 2.1 31 3 120 104 46 4.0 .4 15.4 13.4 5.9 7 2 5 2.1 42 37 21 1.9 .5 11.5 10.2 5.8 20 19 12 $ 17 33 16 1.0 212 4.2 2.1 io 6 5 2 .7 5 1 .6 1 .4 2 1 1611 37 78.4 4.7 305 20 83.8 5.5 210 34 4 4 26 7.1 22 32 38 1470 4 .1 4 .9 12 5 10 60.3 1.7 242 3 .3 1 .4 6 6 .5 160 1 J5 1 JL 13 * 3.2 8 2.0 2 1.6 82 65.6 3.2 20 33 223 6 4 .9 8.0 54.4 1.5 11 16 97 5 5.5 8.0 48.3 2 .5 1 4.2 2.1 66.9 1 3 14 435 100.0 284 100.0 75 100.0 76 100.0 15 3.4 10 3 .5 3 4.0 2 2.6 8 7 247 247 60 1.8 1.6 56.8 56.8 13.8 8 2 178 178 40 2 .8 .7 62.7 62.7 14.1 3 28 28 7 4 .0 37.3 37.3 9 .3 2 41 41 13 2 .6 53.9 53.9 17.1 28.3 2 .8 3 .2 8 .7 93 9 12 24 32.7 3.2 4.2 8 .5 15 1 20.0 1.3 5 6 .7 15 2 2 9 19.7 2 .6 2 .6 11.8 39.8 3.4 96 5 33.8 1.8 44 6 58.7 8 .0 33 4 43.4 5.3 9 .2 ’ 4 ___ ___ ___ 210 m o 143 1 0 0 .0 67 15 7 .1 12 8 .4 3 4 .5 1 fi 3.1 53.5 53.5 16.1 2 13 98 98 44 1 0 6.2 46.7 46.7 21.0 63 63 26 18.2 3 35 35 18 52.2 52.2 26.9 148 22 14 57 22.9 3.4 2.2 8.8 25 10 11.9 4 .8 19 8 13.3 5.6 6 2 9.0 3.0 19 9.0 10 7.0 9 13.4 123 12 14 * 38 270 21 41.9 3.3 97 6 46.2 2.9 68 3 47.6 2.1 29 3 43.3 4 .5 173 15 97 15.0 54 25.7 37 25.9 17 25.4 43 9 .9 18 6.3 9 12.0 16 2L 1 56 28 68 8.7 4.3 12 2 23 5 .7 1.0 11.0 11 2 15 7 .7 1.4 10.5 1 1.5 8 11.9 44 26 45 10.1 6 .0 10.3 22 15 36 7 .7 5.3 12.7 19 8 2 25.3 10.7 2 .7 3 3 7 3 .9 3 .9 9 .2 Girls............................................................... 645 m o Personal and domestic occupations................ Personal service (other than servants in the home).........|........... ............................. . House and home w ork................................. Factory and mechanical occupations............ Factory operative.......................................... Shoe factory............................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades.................. ............. ......... .......... Textile m ill.............................................. Candy factory........................................ . Other factory......................................... . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods....................................... Office w ork................................................... .. Cash and messenger work— department store........................... ................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping room work......................................... Selling.............................................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery.. 30 4 .7 20 345 345 104 1 0 .5 . 2 1.4 10 7 .0 4 4 .1 4 4 .1 m o 4 .5 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 239 ; Including five positions held b y a boy the nationality of whose father was not reported. O C C U P A T IO N S. Apprentice and helper— skilled trad es.. Clericaloccupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods......................................... Office w ork....................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store................................................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping room work........................................... Selling................................................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery... A ll other occupations.......................................... N ot reported........................................................... 4 34 240 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The native children of foreign-born fathers, however, tended to> hold positions as shoe-factory operatives more often than did either of the other groups. Of the positions held by these children 11.1 per cent were for work in shoe factories, whereas of those held by native children of native fathers only 9.6 per cent and of those held by foreign-born children only 9.2 per cent were for this occupation. This comparatively high proportion was due to a decided tendency on the part of the girls of this nativity group to work as operatives in shoe factories. This tendency was most marked among the daughters of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities. Over onefifth, 21 per cent, of the positions held by the girls of this group, including both native and foreign-bom girls, were in this occupation. On the other hand, work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades furnished a very much larger proportion of the positions held by foreign-born children, 17.8 per cent, as compared with 8 per cent of those held by native children of foreign-born fathers and 5.9 per cent of those held by native children of native fathers. Nearly all the children employed in this occupation were girls. When the nationalities of the fathers of these girls are compared it is found that the great majority were foreign bom of non-English-speaking national ities. Only 11.9 per cent of the positions held by girls whose fathers were foreign born of English-speaking nationalities, and 14.4 per cent of those held by girls whose fathers were native, were for this work; but it furnished 28.3 per cent of the positions held by girls whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities, only 20 per cent of those held by Russian-Jewish, but 32.7 per cent of those held b y Italian girls. Although these children were by law required to know at least some English in order to be employed, it is evident that to a considerable extent they tended to secure positions in the occupations so frequently followed by their non-English-speaking par ents, relatives, and friends. In general the proportion of positions held by the native children of foreign-born fathers in the different occupations grouped as “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods,” was higher than that held by foreign-born children and lower than that held by native children whose fathers also were native. Never theless, the proportion held by all children of foreign-born fathers of Enghsh-speaking nationalities, including those who were themselves foreign born, was slightly lower, 70 per cent, than that held by children of native fathers, 70.6 per cent. The different tendency of children of foreign-born fathers, therefore, is to be attributed entirely to the children whose fathers were of non-English-speaking nationalities. Of the positions held by this last group only 56.1 per cent could be classified as “ clerical occupations, wrapping) selling, and delivery of https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O CC U PA T IO N S. 241 jgoods.” Although an even larger proportion, nearly three-fourths, 'or 74.5 per cent, of the positions held by Russian-Jewish children were so classified, less than one-half, 46.6 per cent, of those held by Italian children were in these occupations. The children of Italian parentage, it is evident, were largely responsible for the apparently greater tendency of the whole group of children of foreign-bom fathers than of children of native fathers to go into factory and mechanical rather than clerical and similar occupations. In two of the subgroups included under the general designation “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods,” however, the tendency shown for the entire group was exactly reversed. These two subgroups were “ selling” and “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work.” Of the positions held by native children of native fathers only 2.2 per cent, of those held by native children of foreign-born fathers 3.3 per cent, but of those held by foreign-born children 7.7 per cent involved selling. Of the positions held by native children of native fathers only 3.1 per cent, of those held by native children of foreign-bom fathers 5.2 per cent, but of those held by foreign-bom children 8.5 per cent were for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work. As in other cases, the pposite tendency here shown by the children of foreign birth or extrac tion to that shown by those whose fathers were native is due entirely to the children whose fathers were of non-English-speaking nationalities. But in both these cases this opposite tendency is even more marked among the Russian-Jewish than among the Italian children. Of the positions held by Russian-Jewish children about one-tenth, 10.4 per cent, and of those held by Italian children about one-sixteenth, 6.4 per cent, involved selling. For the Russian-Jewish boys and girls the proportions were about the same. But a somewhat larger propor tion of the positions held by Italian boys, 8 per cent, than of those held by Italian girls, 5.3 per cent, were for this occupation. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work, on the other hand, accounted for more than one-eighth, 13.5 per cent, of the positions held by Russian-Jewish children and for only about one-sixteenth, 6.8 per cent, of those held by Italian children; and the difference between the two groups is due almost entirely to the fact that an unusually large proportion, 25.3 per cent, of the positions held by Russian-Jewish girls were for work of this kind. Messenger, errand, and delivery work provided a somewhat larger portion of positions for native children of foreign-born fathers, 1.6 per cent, than for native children of native fathers, 40.5 per cent, nd a very much larger proportion than for foreign-born children, for whom it furnished only 28.9 per cent of all places held. Although the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 242 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . order of the different nativity groups was the same for boys as fefiL both sexes combined, this difference was due. mainly to the greatei\J tendency of native girls whose fathers were foreign born than of girls of either of the other two nativity groups to take up some form of ' ‘ messenger, errand, and delivery work.” About one-eighth, 12.2 per cent, of the positions held by this group of girls were classified under this general description, as compared with 9.1 per cent of those held by native girls whose fathers were also native and with 7.5 per cent of those held by foreign-bom girls. The children of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationali ties showed a decidedly greater tendency than the children of native fathers and a still greater tendency than the children of foreign-born fathers of non-English-speaking nationalities to go into messenger, errand, and delivery work. Of the positions held by children of this group 46.2 per cent, as compared with only 40.5 per cent of those held by children of native fathers and only 31.7 per cent of those held by children of foreign-born fathers of non-English-speaking nation alities were for occupations of this character. These occupations provided positions, indeed, for about two-thirds, 66.5 per cent, of the boys whose fathers were foreign born of English-speaking nationali ties, as compared with only 54.4 per cent of those whose father were of non-English-speaking nationalities. The girls of both types of foreign parentage, English speaking and non-English-speaking, especially the Italian girls, tended to go into messenger, errand, and delivery work more frequently than did the girls whose fathers were native. .* , In most occupations, as already noted, the distribution of enudren of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities differed comparatively little from that of children of native fathers. This is not true, however, of office work. Only 5.5 per cent of the positions held by the sons of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nation alities, as compared with 11.4 per cent of those held b y the sons of native fathers, were for office work. It should be noted, also, that native girls whose fathers were foreign-born showed nearly as great a tendency to go into office work as did their brothers, whereas of the positions held by the native daughters of native fathers only 3.7 per cent, as compared with 11.4 per cent of those held by their brothers, were for office work. In the tendency to enter personal and domestic occupations the relative position of the girls of the different nativity groups exactly the reverse of that of the boys. Most of the girls in th occupations were employed in “ house and home work,” whi furnished 9.6 per cent of the positions held by native girls whose https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O CC U PA T IO N S. 243 fath ers were native as compared with 4.1 per cent of those held by native girls whose fathers were foreign-bom and with 1.3 per cent of those held by foreign-born girls. Nearly all the boys, on the other hand, were employed in “ personal service other than servants in the hom e” which furnished only 1.5 per cent of the positions held by native boys whose fathers were native as compared with 3.5 per cent of those held by native boys whose fathers were foreignborn and with 5.5 per cent of those held by foreign-born boys. A larger proportion of the positions held by native girls whose fathers were native, 10.2 per cent as compared with 7.1 per cent of those held by all girls, native and foreign-bom, whose fathers were foreignbom of English-speaking nationalities and with only 3.4 per cent of those held by all girls whose fathers were foreign-born of non-Enghsh-speaking nationalities were in personal and domestic occupations. But among the boys this order was again reversed, for only 1.5 per cent of the positions held by the sons of native fathers, as compared with 2.5 per cent of those held by the sons of foreign-bom fathers of English-speaking nationalities and with 6.1 per cent of those held by the sons of foreign-born fathers of non-English-speaking nation alities belonged in this group of occupations. AGE AT TAKING OUT FIRST CERTIFICATE. The younger children showed a greater tendency than did the older to enter clerical and similar occupations, and the older ones showed a greater tendency than the younger to enter factory and mechanical occupations. Table 120 shows that about three-fourths 75.9 per cent, of the children who took out certificates in the four cities when between 14 and 14| years of age, but little over threefifths, 62.4 per cent, of those who took out certificates when between 15^ and 16 years of age, went to work in clerical occupations, wrappmg, selling, and delivery of goods. On the other hand about onethird, 33.9 per cent, of the older group of children, as compared with little more than one-fifth, 21.2 per cent, of the younger, went to work m factory and mechanical occupations. Both the boys and the girls showed, in general, the same tendency. The larger pro portion of the older group of children entering factory and mechanical occupations is probably due in part, however, to the fact already noted, °.that the foreign-born children, who were most likely to enter these occupations, tended to take out their first certificates at later ages than the native children. 90 See Table 18, p. 85. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTON . 244 T able 120.— Occupation first entered, by age at talcing out first certificate and sex; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children taking out first certificates at specified age. children. Occupation first entered and sex. 4,under 14J. L4£,under 15. 5,under 15£. 5i,under 16. Per Per Per Per Per cent cent cent cent cent N um iistri- dum listri- dum Hstri- dum fistri- Num iistriber. ber. ber. ber. ber. bububububution. tion. tion. tion. tion. ■ 159 Personal and domestic occupations........ Personal service (other than serv 107 ants in the hom e)............................... 52 House and home w ork........................ Factory and mechanical occupations— 1,585 1,463 Factory operative.......................... .— Apprentice and helper— skilled 122 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods. . ..................... 3,922 404 Office work................................................ Cash and messenger work— depart751 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and 347 shipping room work.............. 252 Selling............................... . Messenger work, errand and de 2,168 livery.............................................. 23 All other occupations........................... B oys................................................ Girls..................................................... 55 3.2 10 1 .2 .8 340 311 28.5 26.1 39 16 579 541 2.3 .9 33. S 31.7 2.4 38 2 .2 822 99 69.0 1,066 116 8.3 62.4 142 149 12.5 196 11.5 2.5 38 3.5 24 1.9 .9 27.8 25.7 32 1.9 22 2 .0 14 10 361 336 .6 2 1 .2 19.7 16 305 275 1.5 28.0 25.3 2 .1 25 Ì. 5 30 2 .8 29 68.9 1,293 109 7.1 75.9 6.4 741 80 6 8 .0 7.3 13.2 251 14.7 155 6 .8 6 .1 113 6 .6 66 6 .1 88 5.2 50 46 76 57 6.4 4.8 '92 4.4 57 5.4 3.3 38.1 .4 732 7 43.0 .4 390 5 35.8 .5 441 4 37.0 .3 605 7 35.4 j .4 J 740 1 0 0 .0 1 ,0 1 1 620 1 0 0 .0 100 . o ] 2.5 2 .0 22 2 .1 12 1.9 8 1 .1 25 1.9 22 2 .1 12 1.9 6 2 .8 24 2.4 17.4 13.2 123 95 .3 16.6 1 202 .1 2 0 .0 16.6 .1 16.1 12.9 118 95 11.3 9.1 108 82 1 2 .8 168 3.2 23 2 .2 26 4.2 28 3.8 34 3 .4 81.3 8.4 902 85 8 6 .1 8 .1 495 54 79.8 8.7 604 75 81.6 1 0 .1 778 73 77.0 .7 .2 6 .6 71 9.6 87 8 .6 2 .1 13 26 1 .8 3.5 17 34 1.7 3.4 419 4 56.6 .5 567 5 56.1 .5 451 1 0 0 .0 7.9 72 6.9 41 1 .8 3.9 17 46 1 .6 4.4 13 29 59.3 682 65.1 .6 6 .6 . 12,273 1 0 0 .0 92 Personal and domestic occupations........ . Personal service (other than serv 43 ants in the hom e).............................. . 49 House and home work........................ . 1,034 . 1,023 Factory operative. helperApprentice and . 11 trades. Clerical occupations, w rapp ing,! ' . 1,143 and delivery of goods.......... . .. 117 Office w ork................................. Cash and messenger work— depart . 480 m ent store........................... ... Packing, wrapping, labelini .. 287 shipping room work........ .. 117 Selling.......................................... Messenger work, errand, ai ” 142 livery........................................ 3 A ll other occupations...................... 1 0 0 .0 2 .0 1,089 ~ 42 13,419 1 0 0 .0 1,048 1 0 0 .0 67 Personal and domestic occupations. Personal service (other than serv 64 ants in the h om e)................... 3 House and home w ork............ . 551 Factory and mechanical oecupatk . 440 Factory operative....................... Apprentice and helper— skilled Ill trades.................................................... - . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................ . 2,779 Office work............................................... . 287 Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store............................................ . 271 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and 60 shipping room work.......................... 135 Selling.................................................. . . . . Messenger work, errand, and de livery...................................................... . 2,026 20 A ll other occupations................................... L0Q. 0 L, 191 L00.0 1,709 1,703 1 0 0 .0 2; 8 Both sexes............................................. 15,692 1 ,0 0 0 4.0 1.9 2 .2 45.5 45.0 358 5 4.7 57.7 .8 655 1 0 0 .0 469 1 0 0 .0 698 1 0 0 .0 20 3.1 26 5,5 16 3.5 30 4.3 10 10 1.5 1.5 37.1 36.8 10 2 .1 16 197 193 3.4 42.0 41.1 8 8 1 .8 1 .8 217 216 4a 1 47.9 15 15 377 373 54.0 53.4 243 241 4 2 .1 2 .1 .6 .5 2 .3 4 .9 1 50.3 5.1 391 24 59.7 ‘ 3.7 246 26 52.4 5.5 218 24 48.3 5.3 288 43 41.3 109 15.6 .2 2 1 .1 179 27.3 114 243 78 17.3 1 2 .6 96 42 14.7 6.4 53 21 11.3 4.5 63 31 14.0 6.9 75 23 50 7.6 32 6 .8 22 49 38 1 .2 5.1 6 .2 .1 2 6 .2 10 ^ s j 5. 5 .3 1 1 Including three children, two boys and one girl, whose occupations were not reported. 2 Including three children who went to work before they were 14 years of age, according to contmuation-school records, hut who did not secur e em ployment certificates until they were 14. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O CC U PA T IO N S. __ 245 GRADE COMPLETED AND RETARDATION. According to Table 121, tbe lower the grade completed in school, the more likely was the child to begin his industrial career in a factory or mechanical occupation. Of all the first positions held by children who took out their certificates in one of the four cities and had com pleted only the fourth grade, over two-fifths, 42.5 per cent, were for occupations of this kind. But of those held by children who had completed the fifth grade only 30.7 per cent, the sixth 26.9 per cent, the seventh 28 per cent, the eighth 25.9 per cent, and a year or more in high school 23 per cent, were classified as factory and mechanical occupations. The figures for “ clerical occupations, wrapping, sell ing, and delivery of goods” showed a corresponding increase from less than one-half, 49.4 per cent, for the children who had completed only the fourth grade to about three-fourths, 75.2 per cent, for those who had completed a year or more of high school work. Although the older children tended more frequently than the younger to take positions in factories, it nevertheless appears that children from lower grades also tended more frequently than those from higher grades to take these positions. This is explained by the fact that a larger proportion of the foreign-born children who more frequently secured factory positions than did the native came from the lower grades. Their low standing in school, moreover, fre quently meant that they were prevented by the educational require ments of the law from going to work as soon after their fourteenth birthdays as did the native children. This conclusion that the for eign element accounts for at least the greater part of the differences in occupational distribution of the children from the various grades seems to be supported by the fact that, within the group of clerical and similar occupations, “ selling,” and “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work,” which were the only ones of this group to show larger proportions of the foreign-born than of native chil dren, were also the only ones to show a reverse tendency from that of the group as a whole in the occupational distribution of the chil dren by grades. Whatever the reason, the standing of the children in school appears to have had a decided influence over the occupations they entered. Table 122 shows for the continuation school group that a much larger proportion of the positions held by retarded children, 37.4 per cent, than of those held by children from normal grades, 29.9 per cent, and by the latter than by children from grades higher than normal, 24.1 per cent, were for work in factory and mechanical occu pations. As a smaller proportion of the positions held by retarded "hildren than by any other group were for work as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades, it is evident that the retarded children showed a decided tendency to become factory operatives. This tendency is more marked among the girls than among the boys, and appears for all types of factories except those making candy. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T able 121.— Occupation first entered by grade com pleted; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children w ho, before taking out first certificate, attended- Elem entary school:-Grade completed. Occupation first entered. A ll occupations....................................... Personal and domestic occupations................ Personal service (other than servants in the h o m e )............................................... House and home w ork................................. Factory and mechanical occupations............ Factory operatives........................................ Shoe factory............................................. Clothing factory and other needle - t r a d e s . . . , ............................................. Textile m ill.............................................. Candy factory....... ................................. Other factory........................................... Apprentice and helper, skilled trad es... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods...................................... Office w ork....................................................... Cash and messenger work, department sto re ................................................................ Packing, wrapping, labeling, andshipping^room w ork.......................................... Selling................................................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery... A ll other occupations........................................... Per Num cent distriber. bution. Per N um cent ber. distribution. Per N um cent distriber. bution. Per N um cent ber. distribution. AH other schools.1 Per cent N um distriber. bution. N ot reported. Per N um cent distriber. bution. Per cent distribution. 100.0 233 100.0 440 100.0 851 100.0 2 838 100.0 s 1,873 100.0 1,111 100.0 276 100.0 70 16 6 .9 16 3.6 31 3 .6 25 3.0 43 2.3 15 1.4 12 4.3 1 1.4 11 4 .7 12 2.7 2 .2 135 124 39 30.7 28.2 8.9 26.9 25.6 8.0 2.1 .8 28.0 25.8 8.9 24 19 486 443 134 1.3 1.0 25.9 . 23.7 7 .2 11 4 255 232 62 1.0 .4 23.0 20.9 5.6 11 1 124 114 24 4.0 .4 44.9 41.3 8.7 1.4 42.5 40.3 5.2 18 7 235 216 75 1 99 94 12 19 12 229 218 68 22 22 8 31.4 31.4 11.4 29 14 2 37 12.4 6 .0 .Q 15.9 24 23 5.5 5.2 28 23 3 87 19 3.3 2.7 .4 10.4 2. 2 74 27 13 195 43 4.0 1.4 .7 10.4 2. 3 35 16 5 114 23 3.2 1.4 .5 10.3 2.1 54 3 3 30 10 19.6 1.1 1.1 10.9 3.6 1.4 4.3 8.6 4.3 3.1 .6 9.6 1 2 1 3 38 37 26 5 82 * 11 10 14.3 115 6 49.4 2.6 285 10 64.8 2.3 589 35 69.2 4.1 572 41 68.3 4 .9 1,339 148 71.5 7.9 836 144 75.2 13.0 139 13 50.4 4.7 47 7 67.1 10.0 1 4 4 1.7 31 7.0 86 10.1 108 12.9 300 16.0 186 16.7 28 10.1 8 11.4 21 16 68 3 9.0 6 .9 29.2 1.3 38 25 181 4 8.6 5.7 41.1 .9 65 50 353 2 7.6 5.9 41.5 .2 50 33 340 5 6.0 3 .9 40.6 .6 96 63 733 3 5.1 3 .4 39.1 .2 55 51 400 5 5.0 4.6 36.0 .5 18 13 67 1 6.5 4.7 24.3 .4 4 1 27 5.7 1.4 38.6 1 Including special, disciplinary, prevocational, vocational, and other schools. 3 Including one child whose occupation was not reported. * Includes two children whose occupations were not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Per N um cent distriber. bution. H igh school. Eighth. T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . N um ber. Seventh. Sixth. Fifth. Fourth. OCCUPATION'S. 247 L^_The retarded children also showed a somewhat greater tendency l^han the other groups to take positions involving “ selling/’ and “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work,” but the differences here were comparatively slight. In 3.2 per cent of the positions held by retarded children and 2.6 per cent of those held by children from normal grades, the occupation was selling. The tend ency toward “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work” was mainly among the girls. Nearly one-tenth, 9.2 per cent, of all the positions held by retarded girls, as compared with only 6.8 per cent of those held by girls from normal grades and with 5.9 per cent of those held by girls from grades higher than normal, were for this type of work. Another occupation group which the retarded children tended to enter more frequently than other children was the group called “ personal and domestic occupations.” Of the occupations held by retarded children 3.6 per cent, of those held by normal children 2.4 per cent, and of those held by advanced children only 1 per cent were in this group. The children who had completed higher grades than normal for /their ages, on the other hand, showed a greater tendency than the ildren from normal grades or the retarded children to go into office ork and cash and messenger work in department stores. About one-eighth, 12.6 per cent, of the positions held by advanced children involved office work, as compared with only 6.8 per cent of those held by children from normal grades and with only 3 per cent of those held by retarded children; and 18.1 per cent of the positions held by advanced children, as compared with 16.7 per cent of those held by children from normal grades and with only 8.5 per cent of those held by retarded children, were for cash and messenger work in department stores. In the latter case the differences are due primarily to the girls who held most of these positions; cash and messenger work in depart ment stores furnished nearly one-third, 32.1 per cent, of the positions held by advanced girls, as compared with 27.1 per cent of those held by normal and only 14.8 per cent of those held by retarded girls. The only kind of occupation which retarded, normal, and advanced children showed about the same tendency to enter was that classed as messenger, errand and delivery work— the kind which furnished more positions to children than any other single occupation. Of the positions held by retarded children, 38.9 per cent, of those held by normal children 37.3 per cent, and of those held by advanced children per cent, were of this type. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 248 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . T able 122.— Occupation, by retardation and sex o f child; all positions held by children. in B oston continuation school. Positions held b y children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Occupation and sex. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. Per cent N um N um dis ber. ber. tribu tion. Both sexes.................... Personal and domestic oc cupations............................. '■ Personal service (other than servants in the ho m e)............................. House and home work. Factory and mechanical occupations......................... Factory operative.......... Shoe factory.............. Clothing factory and other needle trades...................... Textile m ill.......... . Candy factory.......... Other factory........... Apprentice and h e lp erskilled trades................ Clerical occupations, wrap ping, selling, and deliv ery of goods.......................... Office w ork'...................... Cash and messenger work — department store................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work.......... Selling................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery................. A ll other occupations........... B o y s............................... Personal and domestic oc cupations .............................. Personal service (other than servants in the ho m e)............................. House and home w ork .. Factory and mechanical occupations.............-.......... Factory operative......... Shoe factory........... Clothing factory and other needle trades................... Textile m ill.......... Candy factory — Other factory------Apprentice and helperskilled trades............ Three or One or two more grades grades lower than lower than normal. normal. Total. Per cent N u m dis ber. tribu tion. Per cent N um dis ber. tribu tion. N ot re ported.1 Per Per Per cent Slum cent Num cent dis dis dis ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. 669 100.0 3,284 100.0, 32,547 100.0 22,064 100.0 483 100.0 3881 100.0 7 1.0 80 2 .4 92 3.6 71 3.4 21 4.3 23 2 .6 2 5 .3 .7 40 • 40 1.2 1.2 59 33 2.3 1.3 45 26 2.2 1.3 14 7 2 .9 1.4 20 3 2 .3 .3 161 146 58 24.1 21.8 8.7 982 904 282 29.9 27.5 8.6 952 905 318 37.4 35.5 12.5 752 717 279 36.4 34.7 13.5 200 188 39 41.4 3 8.9' 8.1 201 188 86 22.8 21.3 9.8 38 9 1 40 5.7 1.3 .1 6.0 247 94 31 250 7.5 2.9 .9 7.6 223 115 14 235 8.8 4.5 .5 9.2 149 94 10 185 7.2 4.6 .5 9.0 74 21 4 50 15.3 4.3 .8 10.4 25 21 3 53 2 .8 j 15 2.2 78 2.4 47 1.8 35 1.7 12 2.5 13 L5 58.5 1,231 66 3.0 59.6 3.2 260 10 53.8 2.1 652 57 74.0 6.5 67.3 1,491 76 6.8 6.(1 500 84 74.7 2,211 223 12.6 121 18.1 548 16.7 217 8.5 197 9.5 20 4.1 167 19.0 23 18 3.4 2.7 128 86 3.9 2.6 127 81 5.0 3.2 97 63 4.7 3.1 30 6.2 3.7 45 28 5.1 3 .2 38.0 1,226 11 .1 37.3 .3 990 11 38.9 .4 808 9 39.1 .4 182 2 37.7 .4 355 3 40.3 .3 255 100.0 3586 100.0 254 1 364 100.0 1,772 100.0 1,412 100.0 1,157 100.0 18 28 1.6 43 3.0 32 2.8 11 4.3 15 2 .6 23 5 1.3 .3 41 2 2.9 .1 30 2 2.6 .2 11 4.3 15 2 .6 54 41 17 14.8 11.3 4.7 274 205 83 15.5 11.6 4.7 288 247 99 20.4 17.5 7.0 226 196 86 19.5 16.9 7.4 62 51 13 24.3 20.0 5.1 84 71 28 14.3 12.1 4 .8 4 5 1.1 1.4 .5 1.2 .2 5.0 9 33 5 101 .6 2.3 .4 7.2 6 28 2 74 .5 2.4 .2 6 .4 3 5 3 27 1.2 2 .0 1.2 10.6 1 13 .2 2 .2 29 4.9 3.9 41 2 .9 30 2.6 4.3 13 15 4.1 9 21 4 88 13 3.6 69 1 11 i “ N ot reported” means that the children came from disciplinary, prevocational, and other speci schools, an d that on the records only the school attended, and not the grade completed, was given, s including one position for which occupation was not reported. 3 Including two positions for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 249 OCCUPATIONS. T a b l e 122.— O ccupation, by retardation and sex o f child; all p osition s held by children in B oston con tin u ation school— Concluded. Positions held b y children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lowei grade than îormal. Occupation and sex. A higher grade than normal. N um ber. Boys— Continued. Clerical occupations, wrappine, selline. and delivery of goods.......................... Office w ork....................... Cash and messenger work — department store................................. Packing, wrapping. labeling, and shipping-room work.......... Selling................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery................. A ll other occupations............ G irls.-............................. 309 62 A normal grade. One or two Three or grades more grades lower than lower than normal. normal. Total. Per Per Per cent N u m cent cent dis N um dis N u m dis ber. tribu ber. tribu ber. tribu tion. tion. tion. 84.9 1,460 17.0 157 82.4 1,070 8.9 59 Per cent dis tribu tion. 75.8 4.2 890 51 76.9 4.4 180 8 70.6 3.1 483 43 82.4 7.3 6.3 139 7.8 49 3.5 46 4.0 3 1.2 83 14.2 5 9 1.4 2.5 25 39 1.4 2.2 23 41 1.6 2.9 18 32 1.6 2 .8 5 9 2.0 3.5 10 16 1.7 2.7 57.7 1,100 10 .3 62.1 .6 898 11 63.6 .8 743 9 64.2 .8 155 2 60.8 .8 331 2 56.5 .3 228 100.0 295 100.0 305 100.0 1,512 100.0 21,135 100.0 Textile m ill.............. Candy factory........... Other factory........... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades............... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................... 'Office w ork....................... Cash and messenger work — department store................................. Packing, wrapping. labeling, and shipping-room work.......... Selling................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery................. Per Per cent cent N um N um dis dis ber. ber. tribu tribu tion. tion. 23 210 1 Personal and domestic occupations.............................. Personal service (other than servants in the h om e).............................. House and home w ork .. Factory and mechanical occupations.......................... Factory operative........... Shoe factory............. Clothing factory and other needle N ot re ported. 2 907 100.0 7 2.3 52 3.4 49 4.3 39 4.3 10 4.4 8 2.7 2 5 .7 1.6 17 35 1.1 2.3 18 31 1.6 2.7 15 24 1.7 2.6 3 7 1.3 3.1 5 3 1.7 1.0 107 105 41 35.1 34.4 13.4 708 699 199 46.8 46.2 13.2 664 658 219 58.5 58.0 19.3 526 521 193 58.0 57.4 21.3 138 137 26 60.5 60.1 11.4 117 117 58 39.7 39.7 19.7 34 4 1 25 11.1 1.3 .3 8.2 238 73 27 162 15.7 4.8 1.8 10.7 214 82 9 134 18.9 7.2 .8 11.8 143 66 8 111 15.8 7.3 .9 12.2 71 16 1 23 31.1 7.0 .4 10.1 24 8 3 24 8.1 2.7 1.0 8.1 2 .7 9 .6 6 .5 5 .6 1 .4 191 22 62.6 7.2 751 66 49.7 4.4 421 17 37.1 1.5 341 15 37.6 1.7 80 2 35.1 .9 169 14 57.3 4.7 98 32.1 409 27.1 168 14.8 151 16.6 17 7 .5 84 28.5 18 9 5.9 3 .0 103 47 6.8 3.1 104 40 9.2 3.5 79 . 31 8.7 3.4 25 9 11.0 3.9 35 12 11.9 4.1 44 14.4 126 1 8.3 .1 92 8.1 65 7.2 27 11.8 24 1 8.1 .3 2 Including one position for which occupation was not reported. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 17 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 250 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . VACATION AND REGULAR WORKERS. The opportunities for work during vacation and outside school] hours are, of course, even more limited than those for regular positions for children under 16 years of age. Nevertheless, Table 123 shows that the occupational distribution of first positions held by all-the children who took out certificates for work only during vacation or out of school hours before their sixteenth birthdays did not differ very widely from that of all the children who left school for work before that age. It is somewhat surprising, however, to find that a larger proportion, 31 per cent, of the first positions held by vacation workers than of those held by regular workers, 27.4 per cent, were in factory and mechanical occupations. This is especially surprising in view of the fact that a smaller proportion of the vacation than of the regular workers were foreign-born,91 a fact which doubtless accounts for the smaller proportion of vacation than of regular workers, 4.9 per cent as compared with 6 per cent, who began work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. Shoe factories, on the other hand, furnished exactly one-tenth, 10 per cent, of the first positions held b}^ vacation workers as compared with only 8.5 per cent of those held by regular workers, and nearly one-fifth, 19.5 per cent, of those held by the girls who worked only during vacation as compared with only 14.1 per cent of those held by the girls who worked regularly. The occupations included under the general heading “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of good s/’ were first entered by a larger proportion of the regular than of the vacation workers, 69.2 per cent as compared with 66 per cent. Although a somewhat smaller proportion of vacation than of regular workers went into office work, the difference was due mainly to the fact that little over three-tenths, 31.3 per cent, of the vacation workers as compared with nearly four-tenths, 39.2 per cent, of the regular workers began industrial life in messenger, errand, and delivery work. Each of the other occupations included in this group showed larger proportions of first positions held by vacation than by regular workers. The difference is particularly striking in the case of boys employed in cash and messenger work in department stores. About one-sixth, 16.4 per cent, of the boys who worked only during vacation and only 7 per cent of those who worked regularly entered this occupation. On the other hand it furnished a smaller proportion of the first positions held by girls who worked only during vacation than of those held by girls who worked regularly, 19.2 per cent as compared with 25.9 per cent. The children interviewed who worked and those who did not wor before leaving school show much greater differences in the occupa tions entered when they became regular workers. When both sexes are considered together, however, these differences in occupational » See Table 63, p . 149. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 251 OCCUPATIONS, T a b l e 123. — O ccupation in first regular p osition , by sex o f child; com parison o f vacation T regular workers issued certificates m B oston and regular workers ihterview ed who worked and did n ot work before leaving school. Children issued certificates in Boston who, before becoming 16, worked— Occupation in first regular position, and sex. During vaca tion or out of school hours. N um ber. Regularly. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Children interviewed who left school to work before becoming 16, and who, before leaving school— Worked. Per cent N um distri ber. bution. Per cent distri bution. D id not work. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. 10Ó.0 Both sexes......................................... 1857 100.0 3,544 100.0 324 100.0 499 Personal and domestic occupations.. . Personal service (other than servants in the hom e)........................... House and home work.................... Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative............................. Shoe factory................................. Clothing factory and other . needle trades............................ Textile m ill.................................. Candy factory.............................. Other factory............................... Apprentice and" helper— skilled trades.................................................. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................. Office work........................................... Cash and messenger work— department store................................ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work...................... Selling..................................................... Messenger work, errand, and deliv ery.................................................. A ll other occupations..................... 21 2.5 108 3.0 10 3.1 20 4. O 19 2 266 246 86 2.2 .2 31.0 28.7 10.0 64 44 970 895 300 1.8 1.2 27.4 25.3 8.5 9 1 55 48 21 2.8 .3 17.0 14.8 6.5 8 12 176 173 66 1.6 2 4 35] 3 34.7 13. 2 42 24 4 90 4.9 2.8 :5 10.5 211 102 17 265 6 .0 2.9 .5 7.5 7 9 2 .2 2 .8 55 18 11.0 3.6 11 3 .4 26 5. 2 20 2.3 75 2.1 7 2 .2 3 .6 566 58 66.0 6.8 2,451 266 69.2 7.5 257 24 79.3 7.4 301 26 60.3 5.2 150 17.5 519 14.6 23 7.1 77 15.4 45 45 5.3 5.3 131 144 3.7 4.1 11 19 3.4 5.9 28 21 ♦ 4 .2 268 3 31.3 .4 1,391 15 39.2 .4 180 2 55.6 .6 149 2 2 9 .9 .4 B oys.................................................... 519 100.0 2,114 100.0 280 100.0 197 Personal and domestic occupations.. Personal service (other than servants in the h o m e ).......................... House and home work.................... Factory and mechanical occupations. Factory operative............................... Shoe factory................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades............................. Textile m ill.................................. Candy factory.............................. Other factory............................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades................................................ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........... Office work......................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.............................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work...................... Selling............................................... Messenger work, errand,and delivery.................; ...................... A ll other occupations........................ 7 1.3 44 2.1 7 2. 5 g 7 2.5 5 35 28 13 12.5 10.0 4.6 32 29 16 16.2 14.7 3.1 2 6 O 3.0 2 .5 m o 7 1.3 100 83 20 19.3 16.0 3.9 41 3 321 253 98 1.9 .1 15.2 12.0 4.6 2 10 3 48 .4 1.9 .6 9.2 8 39 3 105 .4 1.8 .1 5.0 1 7 .4 2.5 7 2 .5 5 17 3.3 68 3.2 7 2.5 3 1.5 410 35 79.0 6.7 1,736 196 82.1 9.3 236 21 84.3 7.5 158 12 80.2 6.1 85 16.4 149 7 .0 17 6.1 12 6.1 9 29 1.7 5.6 34 67 1.6 3.1 7 15 2 .5 5.4 5 6 2 .5 3.0 252 2 48.6 .4 1,290 13 61.0 .6 176 2 62.9 .7 123 2 62.4 i Including one girl whose occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 5 .6 1 1 .0 252 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T a b l e 123.— O ccupation in first regular p osition , by sex o f child; com parison o f vacation and regular workers issued certificates in B oston and regular workers interview ed wKd worked and did n ot work before leaving school— Concluded. distribution appear greater than they really are because of the fact that the group of children who worked before leaving school was composed of 280 boys and only 44 girls, and therefore tended decidedly to resemble the boys of the entire interviewed group, whereas the group of children who did not work before leaving school was composed of 197 boys and 302 girls and therefore tended decidedly to resemble the girls. When the boys alone are considered the differences are comparatively slight. Nevertheless only oneeighth, 12.5 per cent, of the boys who had worked, as compared with about one-sixth, 16.2 per cent, of those who had not worked before leaving school entered factory and mechanical occupations when they took their first regular positions. This tendency away from factory occupations shown by the boys who had worked before leaving school was accompanied by a corresponding tendency toward clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.” This is natural in view of the fact, shown in Table 124, that nearly nine-tenths, 89.6 per cent, of these boys had worked in “ clerical https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATIONS. 253 Occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods” in the first positions which they held before leaving school. A large proportion of them, as already stated, held these positions before their fourteenth birthdays and at that time the factory and mechanical occupations were closed to them by law. All the children whose first positions T a b l e 124. O ccupation in first school p osition , by nativity o f jather and nativity and ___________ oj child , interview ed children who worked before leaving school. Children who worked before leaving school. rotai. Occupation in first school position and sex of child. Fathers foreign b om . Both father s '__ and childrei Nativ native. Children Children ity of native. foreign bom . fathers ported: Per Per Per chil Per cent cent cent dren cent Num N um Num .Num ' distri " distri ' distri native. " distri ber. ber. ber. bu bu I ber. bu bu tton.1 tion.1 tton.1 tion.1 B oth sexes____ Personal and domestic occupations Personal service (other than servants m the hom e)... / House and home work. ^Clerical 9ccupations, wrapping, seliiAg. F and delivery of goods. Office work. Cash and messenger work— depart ment store.......... •racking, wrapping, labeling, a n d snipping room work......... Selling............ aft Messenger work, errand and delivery A ll other occupations.. N ot reported____ B o y s. . . Personal and domestic occupations Personal service (other than servants in Home). . .p House and home work Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and dehvery of goods.. 6 Office w ork.. . casn and messenger work— depart m ent store___ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room w ork............ * n Messenger work, errand and delivery A ll other occupations. . . N ot reported____ Girls........... Personal and domestic occupations Personal service (other than servants In home) 3 . . „ House and home w ork.. Pacloiy ana mecnamcal occupations M escal occupations, wrapping, selling and « d e liv e ry of goods................................ B Office worlr W Cash and messenger work— departr ment store___ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work . . S e ll i n g ...:... ...................... Messenger work, errand and delivery N ot reported. . J 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis .[ ---------- - 324 100.0 1 169 29 9 .0 11 15 3.4 4.6 3 3.6 : - - 20 2.4 1 9 8 274 59 100.0 11.8 6 10.2 6 .5 6 5.6 * ' "X 4.7 6 10.2 1 72.9 3.4 12 83.4 1.2 10 10.2 3.0 1 1.7 39.8 44.6 2.4 62 69 1.8 36.7 40.8 1 22 17 1 3 1.7 37.3 28.8 1.7 5.1 5 7 75 100.0 148 100.0 44 100.0 13 1 1.3 2.2 37.7 40.1 .9 .9 33 37 2 280 100.0 18 6.4 17 1 6 0.4 2.1 251 2 89.6 .7 1 .4 4 115 129 3 2 1.4 41.1 46.1 1.1 .7 44 100.0 ; « ■ 1 3 7.4 .7 2.0 89.9 1 1.3 2 32 37 2 2.7 42.7 49.3 2.7 2 61 69 1.4 41.2 46.6 8 100.0 21 100.0 5 5 2 i 34 1 12 17 16 1 2 5 7 1 11 2 1 10 9 2 ...... 43 2 13 5 7 122 130 3 3 23 3 100.0 6 . ...... 15 8 1 5 4 8 9 1 p 9 4 . 4 3 7 . 1 . 1 . 1 . .......... 1 1 ...... 1 1 1 100.0 254 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . before leaving school were in factory or mechanical occupations hadforeign-born fathers and, in spite of the small proportion of girls in the group as a whole, 9 out of the 15 were girls. This was due to the fact that a larger proportion of the girls than of the boys were over 14 when they took their first school positions. Over two-fifths, 41.1 per cent, of the first school positions held by boys were for occupations involving selling, generally as newsboys or from peddlers’ wagons, and an even larger proportion, 46.1 per cent, were for messenger, errand, and delivery work. About half, 49.3 per cent, of the native boys whose fathers also were native went into messenger, errand, and delivery work in their first positions held before leaving school. The proportion of all regular positions held by children of native fathers in personal and domestic occupations was slightly larger, 5 per cent, than that held by the children of foreign-born fathers, which was 4.5 per cent both for native and for foreign-born children. In view of this fact it is interesting to note, not only that the propor tion of first school positions in those occupations was decidedly higher, 9 per cent, than that of regular positions, but also that within the school position group it was much higher, 11.8 per cent, for the native children of foreign-born fathers than for the nativ children of native fathers, for whom it was only 3.6 per cent, and slightly higher than for the foreign-born children, for whom it was 10.2 per cent. METHODS OF SECURING POSITIONS. Positions in the different occupations were secured by all the various methods already discussed, but in some occupations one method was more commonly used than another. Table 125 shows, for example, for the continuation school group of children, that a larger proportion of the positions for factory and mechanical work than of those for clerical and similar occupations, 32.8 per cent, as compared with 27.4 per cent, were secured through friends or relatives, and also that a larger proportion of the former than of the latter, 46.2 per cent, as compared with 43.5 per cent, were secured inde pendently. On the other hand, a larger proportion of the positions for clerical and similar occupations, 7.5 per cent, than of those for factory and mechanical work, 2.2 per cent, were secured through employment agencies of some sort. Private employment agencies alone filled about one-twentieth, 5.3 per cent, of the clerical and similar positions but less than 1 per cent of the factory and mechanica positions. The placement bureau also filled a somewhat larger pr portion of the clerical than of the factory and mechanical positions, 2.4 per cent, as compared with 1.4 per cent, but the day and continua tion schools filled a larger proportion of the latter than of the former positions, 5.3 per cent, as compared with 4.5 per cent. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 255 O CC U PA T IO N S. The positions in personal and domestic occupations were secured through friends or relatives more often than those in any other occu pational division. Moreover, in a comparatively large proportion of these positions the employer was a relative. Of all the positions in this group of occupations, 40.1 per cent, as compared with only 29.4 per cent of those in all occupations, were secured by friends or relatives. Almost one-sixth, 15.3 per cent, of all these positions, as compared with little over one-ninth, 11.9 per cent, of those in all occupations, were secured through relatives alone, and in 8.4 per cent of them, as compared with only 2.2 per cent of those in all posi tions, the employer was a relative. This high proportion occurred chiefly among the boys. In 16.3 per cent of all the positions held by boys in this group of occupations, but in only 2.6 per cent of those held by the girls, was the child employed by a relative. T able 125 — Method o f securing position , by occupation; positions held by children in B oston continuation school. Positions held in specified occupation groups. A ll positions. Factory and Clerical, wrap mechanical. ping, selling, Other and delivery. occu pa tions Per Per Per Per and N um cent N um cent N um cent N um cent not re dis dis dis dis ber. ber. ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tribu ported. tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 Persona] and domestic. ■ Method of securing position. Total............................................... 7,381 100.0 )sition secured through— Friend or relative.......................... 202 100.0 2,296 100.0 4,854 100.0 29 2,169 29.4 81 40.1 754 32.8 1,328 27.4 6 Friend......................... ; . . . Relative................. Employer— relative................ 1,126 881 162 15.3 11.9 2.2 33 31 17 16.3 15.3 8.4 408 320 26 17.8 13.9 1.1 684 527 117 14.1 10.9 2.4 1 3 2 Independently secured................. 3,254 44.1 70 34.7 1,060 46.2 2,112 43.5 12 Applied personally................. 3,070 Answered advertisement......... 169 Worked there before................... 15 41.6 2.3 .2 67 3 33.2 1.5 1,007 48 5 43.9 2.1 .2 1,985 117 10 40.9 2 4 .2 11 5 Em ploym ent offered............. 328 4.4 21 10.4 68 3.0 234 4 .8 Em ploym ent agency, etc................. 420 5.7 5 2.5 51 2.2 363 7.5 1 State employment office.......... Private employment agencv.. Philanthropic organizations.. ‘ 105 282 33 1.4 3.8 .4 2 2 1 1.0 1.0 .5 20 21 10 .9 .9 .4 82 259 22 1.7 5.3 .5 1 School or placement bureau____ 490 6.6 6 3.0 153 6 .7 331 6 .8 D ay school......................... Continuation school........... Placement bureau................. 140 199 151 1.9 2 .7 2.0 2 1.0 4 2.0 53 68 32 2JJ 3^0 1.4 131 115 2 .4 A ll other m ethods......................... 3 N ot reported....................................... 717 1 9.7 1 N ot shown where less than one-tenth of 1 per cent. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 19 9 .4 209 2 9.1 484 10.0 5 256 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. Table 126 shows, for the children interviewed, that there was con siderable difference in the methods by which first positions were secured between the occupations included in the two general groups “ factory and mechanical occupations” and “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.” This table relates to a different group of children from those included in the preceding table, and also covers only first positions which, as has been shown, are secured by somewhat different methods than later positions. Nevertheless, it confirms the conclusion that a larger proportion of factory than of clerical and similar positions were secured through friends or relatives, and also that a larger proportion of the former than of the latter were secured independently. It also confirms the conclusion that employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus filled a larger proportion of positions for clerical and similar work than for factory and mechanical occupations. T a b l e 126.— Method o f securing first regular position, by occupation; children interviewed. Children securing first regular position b y specified method. Occupation. A ll chil dren. Friend or relative. Independ ently. Em ploy ment offered. Em ploy ment agen cy, school, placement bureau, etc. Not re»'' ported. Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per ber cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 Total....................................... Personal and domestic occupa tions. .................................................... Factory and mechanical occupa tions...................................................... Factory operative....................... Shoe factory........................... Clothing factory and other needle trades..................... Other factory......................... Apprentice and helper— skill ed trades...................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods. . . Office work..................................... Cash and messenger work— department store..................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work— Messenger work, errand and delivery....................................... Other clerical, etc., occupa tions .............................................. A ll other occupations........ ................ 823 406 49.3 316 38.4 38 4.6 0.9 30 53.7 54.8 46.0 40.7 41.2 48.3 72.6 50.0 22.6 47.1 46.0 38.5 34.0 39.0 53.0 46.2 36.2 1.6 48.6 10 558 50 263 23 8.6 12.0 5.2 6.0 6.7 34 10.3 1 N ot shown'where base is less than 50. Decided variations were found within the different groups. For instance, friends or relatives secured first positions for not far from three-fourths, 72.6 per cent, of the children who began their industrial careers as operatives in clothing factories or other needle trades but for considerably less than one-half, 46 per-cent, of those who began https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O CC U PA T IO N S. 257 as operatives in shoe factories. This was doubtless due to the larger proportion of foreign-born children— who, as already noted,92 tended to secure their positions through their friends or relatives— employed in clothing factories and other needle trades. In cash and messenger work in department stores, moreover, friends and relatives played a much less prominent part in securing first positions than in office or in messenger, errand, and delivery work. Only 39 per cent of the children who went into cash and messenger work in department stores secured their first positions through friends or relatives as compared with 46 per cent of those who went into office work and with 46.2 per cent of those who went into messenger, errand, and delivery work. Over half, 53 per cent, of the department store positions were secured independently. An unusually large propor tion, 12 per cent, of the office work positions but nearly as large a proportion, 10.3 per cent, of the messenger, errand, and delivery work positions were secured through employment agencies, schools or placement bureaus. CHARACTER OP OCCUPATIONS. The general character of the different occupations in which the children were employed is indicated, in part at least, by the occupa tion designation. The children who were engaged in messenger, errand, and delivery work, for example, must have walked or ridden on vehicles and in many cases worked outdoors. On the other hand, those who were employed as factory operatives must have carried on their work indoors and for the most part in sitting positions. Children engaged in cash and messenger work in department stores and in “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room w ork” also worked indoors, but the former group must have walked a great deal and many of the latter must have stood at their work. It is obvious, therefore, that a large part of the work in which boys were engaged was outdoors and involved much walking, while most of that in which girls were employed was indoors and meant a fairly constant sitting position. Work at or in connection with machines was not common. In only about one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, of all the positions in which the children interviewed were employed, according to Table 127, was there any machine work. In many, if not most, of these positions the children were employed at machine work for only part of the time. X)f the factory operative positions alone, however, not far from onethird, -31.6 per cent, involved some machine work, and as a result machine work was much more common among the girls, who pre dominated in this group of occupations, than among the boys, who •* See Table 83, p . 177. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 258 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . tended to enter in larger numbers the occupations classed as “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods,” only 1.9 per cent of which involved any machine work. The largest proportion of positions involving machine work, 40 per cent, was found among the operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. In over one-sixth, 17.5 per cent, of the positions filled by girls, but only about one-twentieth, 5.3 per cent, of those filled by boys, was there work on or about machines of any kind. T a b l e 127.— Type o f work, by occupation and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interviewed. Regular positions. Involving some Involving no machine work. machine work. Occupation and sex. Type of work not reported. Total. B oth sexes............................. Personal and domestic occupations..................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................. Factory operative................... Shoe factory.............. Clothing factory and other needle trades............................................... Textile m ill.......................... Other factory................................ Apprentice and helper— skilled trades........ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................. A ll other occupations......... B o y s .......................................... Personal and domestic occupations..................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................. Factory operative........................... Shoe factory.................. Clothing factory and other needle trades.................................................. Textile m ill............................ Other factory.................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades........ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods................................. All other occupations.............................................. Girls................................................... Personal and domestic occupations............. Factory and mechanical occupations.................. Factory operative..................................... Shoe factory............................................ Clothing factory and other needle trades........................................................... Textile m ill.......................................... Other factory................................................ Apprentice and helper— skilled trades____ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods............................................. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. » 1,943 207 10.7 89 588 563 199 3 180 178 59 3.4 30.6 31.6 29.6 185 53 126 25 74 19 26 2 1,248 17 » 1,093 Per cent.1 N um ber. Per ■ cent.1 *1,727 88.9 9 0.5 86 400 378 137 96.6 68.0 67.1 68.8 8 7 3 1.4 1.2 1.5 40.0 35.8 20.6 108 33 100 22 58.4 62.3 79.4 3 1 îTë 1.9 24 1.9 1,224 16 98.1 58 5.3 »1,033 94.5 2 .2 26.7 30.0 30.4 38 120 98 48 72.7 70.0 69.6 1 .6 38 165 140 69 44 42 21 8 22 41 25 7 6 8 2 872 17 14 1 1 16 33 22 1 1.6 858 16 98.4 ____ 1 1 850 149 17.5 694 81.6 7 .8 51 423 423 130 3 136 136 38 5.9 32.2 32.2 29.2 48 280 280 89 94.1 66.2 66.2 68.5 7 7 3 1.7 1.7 2.3 177 31 85 67 13 18 37.9 107 17 67 60.5 3 1 1.7 21.2 376 10 2.7 366 97.3 78.8 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. aIncluding 1 position for which occupation was not reported. OCCUPATIONAL SHIFT. Before a child could obtain an employment certificate in Massachu•setts a physician had to certify that he was physically able to do the https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U P A T IO N 'S . 259 work for which the particular certificate was requested.93 This physi cian’s certificate, as already stated, was made out on the back of the card, the face of which bore the name of the occupation, written by the employer. The physician, therefore, always knew the name of the occupation in which the employer said the child was to be engaged. There was nothing in the law, however, to prevent the employer from transferring the child to some other occupation whenever occasion arose, provided the other occupation was not so dangerous or injurious that it was prohibited for all children. In some cases children, upon beginning work, were employed in different occupations from those for which their certificates read, and in.a considerable number, though employed in the occupations shown in their certificates, they worked also in supplementary occupations. For example, an errand boy in a grocery might also watch stock and sell to customers during the noon hour. In some of these latter cases children were employed in two different types of occupation at the same time, as when a boy employed by a real estate dealer to run errands was given typewriting to do when not needed for his major occupation, or when a girl employed for sowing by a dressmaker was sent on errands. These supplementary occuations, however, would usually be expected from the nature of the work originally designated and can hardly be considered as evading any safeguard of the law. The cases of the first kind, in which a child was put at-work essentially different from that for which the employer stated that he was hired, were comparatively few. It more often happened that a child was transferred to another occupation than that specified on his promise of employment after he had been at work for a time, and these cases give a conservative measure of the employment of children in occupations not contem plated by the issuing officer or the examining physician when the certificate was issued. In over one-eighth, 13.5 per cent, of all the positions held by the children interviewed, as appears in Table 128, the children were actually transferred from one occupation to another. Most of these transfers, however, were to similar occupa tions. In 7.9 per cent of their positions the children were transferred to another occupation of the same kind, so far as the occupational classification adopted for this report is concerned, as the one for which the certificate was made out.* In about 1 case out of 20, 5.6 per cent, they were transferred to an occupation of a different class. Boys were not shifted so often from one occupation to another in the same position as were girls. About one-eighth, 12.8 per cent, of the positions held by girls showed occupational shifts within the same classification, but only about one-half as large a proportion, 6 per cent, showed occupational shifts to other classifications. 98 Acts of 1919, ch. 514, sec. 58, as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 16. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 260 T Th e able w o r k in g c h il d r e n of boston . 1 2 8 . — Change o f occupation in a p osition by occupation and sex o f child; regular, p osition s held by children interviewed. Regular positions. Occupation and sex of child. Total. Both sexes........................................................ Personal and domestic occupations................... Factory and mechanical occupations................ Factory operative............................................. Shoe factory................................................. Clothing factory, and other needle t r a d e s ..................................................... Other factory............................................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades___ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.......... ........................................ Office work........................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work............................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery____ Selling..................................................................... A ll other occupations........................................... B o y s................................................................... Personal and domestic occupations................... Factory and mechanical occupations................ Factory operative............................................. . Shoe factory................................................ Clothing factory, and other needle trades....................................................... Other factory.............................................. Apprentice and helper— skilled trades.. . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................................... Office.work......................................... ................. Cash and messenger work—department store................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work............................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery Selling............................................... ................ All other occupations.............................................. 1,943 Showing an oc Showing an oc cupational shift cupational shift Showing no oc in same classi to another clas cupational shift. fication. sification. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. 154 7.9 108 5.6 ¡1,681 86.5 86 96.6 81.3 80.5 68.3 3.4 14.8 15.5 25.1 89 588 563 199 13.0 7.3 1,248 101 213 31 14.6 4.2 158 159 25 85.4 1,100 88.1 92 91.1 173 81.2 88.8 « 1,093 90.9 89.3 84.1 3.2 872 73 786 Girls.................................................................... 850 Personal and domestic occupations................... Factory and mechanical occupations.............. Factory operative............................................. Shoe factory................................................ Clothing factory, and other needle trades................................................. ....... Other factory............................................ .. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................................ ........... Office work.......................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work............................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery___ Selling................................................................... 51 423 423 130 5.9 18.9 18.9 34.6 177 116 13.0 10.3 109 66 90.1 90.4 48 328 328 78 94.1 77.5 77.5 60.0 12. i 376 28 26 6.9 *158 20 12.7 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. a Including one position for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 478 453 136 Per cent.1 81.2 85.3 85.3 20 9.6 314 26 83.5 3.2 133 84.2 12.9 23.0 82.9 74.7 O C C U P A T IO N S . 261 The shifting from one occupation to another in the same position as naturally most likely to occur in establishments employing a considerable number of children in different occupations. It is not surprising to find, therefore, that the largest proportion of positions in which girls changed their occupations was found among the shoefactory operatives. Most of these changes, however, were to similar occupations. More than one-third, 34.6 per cent, of the shoe-factory operative positions held by girls involved changes of occupation within the same classification and only about one-twentieth, 5.4 per cent, to different classifications. Among positions in clothing fac tories and other needle trades, which were generally in much smaller establishments than shoe factories, only a little over one-eighth, 13 per cent, of those held by girls involved changes within the same classification, while only 1.7 per cent involved changes to another classification. Outside of factories, the only positions in which much shifting occurred were those in which the original occupation was classified as cash or messenger work in department stores. Onefifth, 20 per cent, of the positions so classified which were held by boys and about one-eighth, 12.7 per cent, of those held by girls showed ^occupational shifts within the same classification and 7.3 per cent of he boys’ positions and 3.2 per cent of the girls’ positions showed occupational shifts to different classifications. One important fact brought out in this table is that in nearly onefourth, 23 per cent, of all the cases in which girls were employed for messenger, errand, and delivery work and in about one-eighth, 12.9 per cent, of those in which they were employed for “ packing, wrap ping, labeling, and shipping-room w ork” they were transferred to occupations of an entirely different character. Evidently the occu pation tables already given, which are based upon the first kind of work carried on in each position, must exaggerate the amount of work done by girls in these two groups. Evidently, too, a promise of employment specifying that a girl is to be employed in one of these classes of occupations is peculiarly weak evidence as to what she is actually likely to be called upon to do. In many cases the shift of occupation is a benefit to the child, as when a girl employed to do errands in a dressmaking or millinery establishment is given sewing when she is not needed for errands, and is thus afforded an opportunity to learn at least a little of the trade. In a case in which the physician would not have certified that the child was able to do any and every kind of work the shift may sily be to an occupation which he would not have approved, and e protection of his certificate may be thus entirely removed. T IM E W O R K E D . At the time of this study most of the children were still at work, many of them in their first regular positions. How long they may https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . 262 THE W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O ST O N . have stayed in these positions after the date of the interview or after their sixteenth birthdays was not a point included in the study, which covered the industrial histories of the interviewed children only up to the time they were questioned by bureau agents and of the other children only up to their sixteenth birthdays. It was there fore not possible to ascertain the average length of time that the children remained in positions in different occupations. The number of first regular positions which ended within specified periods could be ascertained, however, with a fair degree of accuracy for the children interviewed.94 Table 129 shows the rate at which first regular posi tions in different occupations were terminated. The largest proportion of short-term positions— that is, of positions lasting less than three months—was found, as would be expected, in cash and messenger work in department stores. Of all the first regular positions in this occupation more than one-half, 53 per cent, lasted less than three months; of all those held by girls alone the percentage terminated during this period was even higher, 57.9 per cent. Nearly one-sixth, 16 per cent, of all these positions, and over one-fifth, 21.2 per cent, of those held by girls, lasted less than a week; while over one-third, 35 per cent, of all, and 36.7 per cent of those held by girls lasted from one week to one month. In other words more than one-half, 51 per cent, of all first regular positions for cas and messenger work in department stores, and not far from threefifths, 57.9 per cent, of those held by girls lasted less than one month. The great majority of these positions were evidently temporary in character, for special seasons such as the period just before Christ mas or for sales. It should be noted, however, that a considerable number of permanent positions for this type of work were evidently open to children, for over one-third, 36 per cent, of all the children— though a smaller proportion, only 31.1 per cent of the girls— who first entered this occupation appear to have held their positions for at least a year. 94 j n calculating the percentages a small proportion of first positions not terminated before the end of 12 months have been treated as if they lasted the full 12 m onths. The percentages in the table, therefore, slightly understate the proportion terminated before 1 2 months and slightly overstate the proportion that terminated at 12 months and over. That errors are not great is shown in the following table, in which an estimate has been made of the total number of positions that womd have terminated before the end of the year based on the proportion among the known cases. P e r cent o f children com mencing work whose positions terminated in specified period. Period. Under 1 week— ........................ 1 week but under 1 m onth— 1 monti} but under 3 months. 3 months but under 6 months https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Uncor rected. Cor rected. Period. months but under 9 m onth s.. 9 months but under 12 months. 12 months and over...................... . 6 Cor Uncor rected. rected. 6.6 4 .5 36.2 OCCUPATION'S. 263 Another occupation in which the percentage of first positions held for less than three months was unusually high was work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. First positions in this occupation were held for less than three months by over twofifths, 43.6 per cent, of all children, and by a still larger proportion, 45.7 per cent, of the girls concerned. Very few of these positions, however, were terminated within a week and about one-fourth, 24.2 per cent, within from one to three months. At the same time com paratively few clothing factory and needle trades positions, as com pared with other occupations, lasted for 12 months or more. For both sexes the proportion lasting that long was not quite threetenths, 29 per cent, and for girls it was about one-fourth, 25.4 per cent. This is doubtless due to the fact that a large part of the work in clothing factories and other needle trades is seasonal in character, but the rush seasons are much longer than the sales periods of de partment stores. Office work and “ messenger, errand, and delivery w ork” showed the highest proportions, 72 per cent for the former and 70.5 per cent for the latter, of positions lasting three months or longer. Office work also showed the highest proportion, 44 per cent, of positions lasting a year or over. Even in messenger work consider ably more than one-third, 37.7 per cent, of all the first regular positions held lasted a year or more. In positions lasting for 12 months or more, however, shoe factories ranked higher than messenger work. Of all the first regular positions for work as opera tives in shoe factories considerably more than two-fifths, 43.7 per cent and nearly half, 48.3 per cent, of those entered by girls, were held for a year or over. Comparatively few positions in these occu pations, as compared with those in occupations which had high pro portions of short-time positions, were terminated, as will be seen later,95 by the discharge of the children. The positions held by girls generally lasted for shorter periods than those held by boys. Over two-fifths, 41 per cent, of all the first positions held by girls lasted less than three months, and about one-twelfth, 8.7 per cent, of them lasted less than a week, whereas of those held by boys less than one-third, 32.1 per cent, lasted less than three months and a very small proportion, only 2.5 per cent, less than a week. At the same time the proportion of positions lasting 12 months and over which were held by girls and by boys did not differ reatly, 34.7 per cent and 36.3 per cent, respectively. The failure of girls to hold their positions for as long periods as boys was undoubtai See Table 135, pp. 282-283. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 264 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T a b l e 129. — D uration o f first regular position by occupation arid sex; children interviewed. Children whose first regular positions terminated Less than 3 months. Occupation and sex. Total. Total. Less than one week. One week but less than 1 month. One month but less than 3 months. N u m - Per N um Per N um Per N um Per her. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 B oth sexes................. ......................................... Personal and domestic occupations...................... Factory and mechanical occupations................. . Factory operative................................................. Shoe factory...........................1....................... Clothing factory, etc.................................... Other factory................................................. Apprentice and helper, skilled trades.......... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goo d s...................................................... Office work.............................................................. Cash and messenger work— department store.............................. ....................................... . Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom w o rk ........................................................ . Messenger work, errand and delivery.......... Selling....................................................................... A ll other occupations.......................... ........... .......... 823 558 50 100 Girls................. ....................... ........................... . Personal and domestic occupations...................... Factory and mechanical occupations................. . Factory operative....................... ....................... . Shoe factory.................................................. . Clothing factory, etc.................................. . Other factory................ .................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods............................... . . . . . . ........... . Office work.......................................................... . Cash and messenger work— department store...................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling and shippingroom w ork......................................................... Messenger work, errand and delivery......... Selling..................................................................... 1 N ot shown when base is less th an 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 35.9 42 5.1 129 15.7 36.3 38.0 35.6 43.6 36.1 14.7 15.4 19.5 14.5 35.1 28.0 16.1 13.4 16.0 10.0 16.0 15.1 16.9 17.6 13.7 24.2 16.7 11.1 16 53 124 2.0 35 14.0 153 B o y s...................................................................... Personal and domestic occupations...................... Factory and mechanical occupations................. . Factory operative................................................ Shoe factory.................................................... Clothing factory, etc.................................. . Other factory................................................. Apprentices and helpers, skilled tra d e s.. . . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods..................................................... . Office w ork....... ...................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store...................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling and shippingroom work..................... ................................. .. Messenger work, errand and delivery.......... Selling........................................... ..................... .. A ll other occupations___ „•......... ............................ . 295 32.1 12 2.5 64 34.3 40.4 394 33 121 29 12 30.7 11 2.8 77 14.9 17.5 21.1 13.2 14.7 17.9 30.4 346 71 142 41 16.1 14.7 30 8.7 65 47 37.2 37.2 32.8 45.7 14.6 14.6 19.0 15.3 16.4 16.4 10.3 25.4 45.7 23.2 10.4 15 26 36.7 265 OCCUPATIONS, T a b l e 129.- -D u ra tion o f first regular p osition by occu pa tion and sex; children interview ed —Concluded. Children whose first regular positions terminated in— Three months and over. Occupation and sex. Total.1 3 months but less than 6 months. 6 months but less than 9 months. 9 months but less than 12 months. 12 months and over.1 Num- Per N um - Per Num - Per N um - Per Num ber. cent.5 ber. cent.5 ber. cent.5 ber. cent.5 ber. cent.2 Both sexes.................. , ....................... 528 Personal and domestic occupations........ . Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative.................................. . Shoe factory..................................... . Clothing factory, etc..................... . Other factory................... ............... . Apprentice and helper,skilled trades. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods................................. Office w ork......................... ....................... Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store............................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room w ork........................... Messenger work, errand and delivery. Selling...................................................... .. A ll other occupations................................... 64.1 139 16.9 54 6.6 37- 4.5 298 36.2 18 147 63.7 137 62.0 56 64.4 35 56.4 46 •64.0 10 5 35 33 11 9 13 2 15.1 14.9 12.6 14.5 18.1 6 14 12 5 3 4 2 6.1 5 .4 5.7 4 .8 5.6 1 9 8 2 5 1 1 3.9 3.6 2 .3 8.1 1.4 6 89 84 38 18 28 5 38.5 38.0 43.7 29.0 38.9 362 36 64.9 72.0 98 9 17.6 18.0 34 3 6.1 6 .0 27 2 4 .8 4.0 203 22 36.4 44.0 47 47.0 7 2.0 2 2 .0 36 36.0 37.7 36.3 7.0 2 11 61 10 1 18.5 1 26 2 7.9 21 2 6.4 12 124 9 67.9 82 17.2 36 7.5 28 5 .9 178 65.7 59.7 1 12 10 4 17.9 17.5 2 4 2 2 6.0 3 .5 1 3 2 1 24 23223 1 70.5 Boys.......................................................... 324 Personal and domestic occupations.......... Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative.................................... Shoe factory....................................... Clothing factory, e tc ....................... Other factory, ......................... ......... Apprentices and helpers, skilled trades....... ............................ , ................. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods.................................. Office w ork................................................ Cash and messenger work— depart ment store. ........................................ Packing, wrapping, labeling and shipping room w ork........................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery S ellin g;........................ ............................... A ll other occupations......... .......................... 6 44 34 17 8 14 — 273 25 2 69.3 68 4 17 1 9 208 14 1 4 53 6 1 59.0 57 62.8 62.8 67.3 54.2 4 23 23 7 9 7 — 69.5 _________ G i r l s ...,.............................. ................... 204. Personal and domestic occupations.......... Factory and mechanical occupations... Factory operative.................................... Shoe factory............... ....................... Clothingfactory, e tc ....................... Otherf actory............................... . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling and delivery of goods............. .................... Office w ork................................................. Cash and messenger work—depart m ent store . . . ...... ................... ........... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work............ ............... .Messenger work, errand and delivery, fe llin g ........................................................... 12 103 103 39 32 32 1 6 10 17.3 30 2 7.6 24 2 6.1 2 151 17 38.4 14 17.7 1 26 1 8.7 19 1 6.3 4 110 6 36.8 19.7 18 6.2 9 3.1 120 34.7 14.0 14.0 12.1 15.3 4 10 10 3 3 4 6.1 6.1 5 .2 5.1 6 6 1 5 3 .7 3 .7 1.7 8.5 4 64 64 28 15 21 39.0 39.0 48.3 25.4 3 1.8 52 5 31.7 22 31.1 54.2 30 5 18.3 4 1 2 .4 30 42.3 6 8.5 2 2 .8 7 8 4 37.4 35.1 1 2 89 11 15 24 9 4.5 3.5 2 25 20 10 g 7 1 2 1 g 14 3 1 A l l the first regular positions which were not terminated at the date of the interview were considered have lasted for 12 months or over; 66.1 per cent of them had already lasted 12 months or over; 16.6 per cent had already lasted from 9 to 12 months; and 12.9 per cent had lasted from 6 to 9 m onths. See Appendix Table I I I , p. 361. 2 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 2 2- -18 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 266 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . edly due primarily to their choice of occupations, particularly to their employment in such seasonal occupations as operative work JB clothing factories and other needle trades, and in department store “ sales.” HOURS OF LABOR. Decided differences were found in the weekly hours of labor re quired in the different occupations. Of the 84 cases already men tioned in which the weekly hours were less than 36, Table 130 shows that 37 were positions for messenger, errand, and delivery work, 13 for personal and domestic occupations, 7 for cash and messenger work in department stores, and 5 each for office work and for work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. But the largest proportion of such positions in any one occupation was 14.6 per cent for personal and domestic occupations. For no other kind of occupation except selling was the proportion of positions in which the hours were less than 36 a week higher than the 5 per cent shown for office work. For all positions in factory and mechanical occupa tions it was only 1.2 per cent. All such positions in factory and mechanical occupations and also for cash and messenger work in department stores were held by girls, and all those for messenger, errand, and delivery work by boys. Of the 125 positions in which the horns were very long, 54 or over weekly, 62, or about half, were for messenger, errand, and delivery work, but 23 were in personal and domestic and 22 in factory and mechanical occupations. Nevertheless in over one-fourth, 25.8 per cent, of the whole group of positions in personal and domestic serv ice, as compared with 8.2 per cent of those in messenger, errand, and delivery work and with only 3.7 per cent of those in factory and me chanical occupations these hours were required. In considerably over one-third, 37.3 per cent, of the personal and domestic positions held by girls, the hours were over 54 a week; but most of the messen ger, errand, and delivery work positions in which these were the hours, 58 out of 62, were held by boys. Messenger, errand, and delivery work again took the lead in the number of positions in which the hours were over 48 but under 54. Of 172 such positions 85 were for this class of occupations, but 53 were for factory and mechanical occupations, 32 of them for work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades. In over one-sixth, 17.3 per cent, of the latter positions the hours were between 48 and 54 a week. All but three of these positions were held girls. But 78 of the 85 messenger work positions were held by boys. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U PA TIO N S. 267 In most occupations a large majority of the children worked either ■from 86 to 48 hours or exactly 48 hours a week. In factory and mechanical occupations these two hour groups together included 83.5 per cent of all the positions, the larger proportion, 46.3 per cent, being in the group where the hours were from 36 to 48. In shoe fac tories,. however, over nine-tenths, 92.9 per cent, of the positions required from 36 to 48 or exactly 48 horns work, and in the larger pro portion, 64.3 per cent, or not far from two-thirds, the hours were exactly 48 a week. On the other hand, of the factory and mechanical occupations specifically enumerated, work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades showed the smallest proportion, 74.1 per cent, of positions in which the hours belonged in one of these two groups. In over one-half, 53 per cent, of these positions, the hpurs were from 36 to 48 and in only a little over one-fifth, 21.1 per cent, they were exactly 48. It appears, therefore, that of all the factory and mechanical occupations in which the work of children under 16 was used to any considerable extent, their hours varied most in clothing factories and other needle trades, where in nearly one-fourth, 23.8 per cent, of all the positions held the weekly hours were either less than 36 or more than 48. These variations in hours „affected the work of girls far more than that of boys, for 177 out of the 185 positions in this occupation were held b y girls. The weekly hours in clerical and similar occupations showed wider variations in general than those in factory and mechanical occupa tions. The proportion of all positions for clerical and similar work in which the hours were either 36 but less than 48, or exactly 48, was 77.6 per cent, the larger proportion, 41.9 per cent, being in the group where the hours were exactly 48 a week. But even greater differences in the matter of hours were found between the different occupations included in this group than between those included in the group of factory and mechanical occupations. For example, the hours were 36 but less than 48 in over two-thirds, 67.3 per cent, of the office work positions but in only a little over one-half, 51 per cent, of the positions for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work, and for less than one-sixth, 14.6 per cent, of those for cash and messenger work in department stores. On the other hand, they were exactly 48 in about one-fifth, 20.8 per cent, of the office work positions, in over one-third, 36.5 per cent, of the positions for packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work, and in almost, four-fifths, 77.9 per cent, of those for cash and messenger work in department stores. In the last-named occupation, cash and mes senger work in department stores, the hours were more frequently exactly 48 than in any other, and in only 6.1 per cent of these posi- https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 268 th e T able w o r k in g c h il d r e n of boston . 130.— H ours w eekly, by occupation and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interview ed. Regular positions’showing specified number of hours weekly. Occupation and sex. A ll regular posi- 36, under 48. Under 36. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. 48 even. N um Per ber. cen t.1 Per cent.1 B oth sexes.......................................................... s i , 943 84 4.3 735 37.8 760 39.1 89 588 563 199 13 7 7 14.6 1.2 1.2 13 272 258 57 14.6 46.3 45.8 28.6 15 219 214 128 16.9 37.2 38.0 64.3 185 179 25 5 2 2.7 1.1 98 103 14 53.0 57.5 39 47 5 21.1 26.3 1,248 101 59 5 4 .7 5.0 446 68 35.7 67.3 523 21 41.9 20.8 213 7 3.3 31 14.6 166 77.9 53 270 24 4 51.0 35.8 31.6 38 283 15 3 36.5 37.5 19.7 409 37.4 389 35^6 45.5 43.6 33.3 5 61 56 41 37.940.0 59.4 Clothing factory and other needle Ap pi t/ii iico £ind Ii6lp6r^ slvillGd trjidcs - - - - * Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and Cash and messenger work— department Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipMessenger work, errand, and delivery......... A ll other occupations................................................. 104 754 76 17 4 .9 37 13.2 10 5 ............... B o y s..................................................... - .............. s 1,093 60 38 165 140 69 7 Clothing factory and other needle .5.5 7 75 61 23 8 63 25 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and 872 73 48 3 3 35 14 55.6 15 5 23.8 5 .5 4.1 323 53 37.0 72.6 320 14 36.7 19.2 18.2 40 72.7 Cash and messenger work— department 55 10 34 667 43 17 37 8 5 5.5 13 233 14 4 850 24 2 .8 326 38.4 371 43.6 51 423 423 130 6 7 7 11.8 1.7 1.7 6 197 197 34 11.8 46.6 46.6 26.2 10 158 158 87 19.6 37.4 37.4 66.9 177 116 5 2 2 .8 1.7 95 68 53.7 58.6 39 32 22.0 27.6 376 28 11 2 2 .9 123 15 32.7 203 7 54.0 158 7 4 .4 21 13.3 126 79.7 40 37 10 57.1 42.5 24 38 8 34.3 43.7 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipMessenger work, errand, and delivery......... Clothing factory and other needle Clerical occupations“, wrapping, selling, and Cash and messenger work— department Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship70 87 33 2 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. Including one positionf or which occupation was not reported. 2 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 34.9 14 245 7 3 36.7 269 O C C U P A T IO N S. T able 130.— H ours w eekly, by occu pation and sex o f child; regular p osition s held by children interview ed —Concluded. Regular positi ons showing spec ified number of hours weekly. Occupation and sex. Over 48, under 54. N um ber. 54 or over. N ot reported. Per cent.1 N um ber. 172 8.9 125 6.4 *67 3.4 8 53 50 7 32 11 3 9.0 9.0 8.9 3 .5 17.3 6.1 23 22 20 3 7 10 2 25.8 3.7 3.6 1.5 3.8 5.6 17 19.1 2.6 2 .5 2.0 2.2 3.4 111 3 6 8.9 3.0 2.8 76 2 6.1 2.0 33 2 3 2.6 2.0 1.4 9 85 8 8.7 11.3 10.5 1 62 11 4 1.0 8.2 14.5 3 17 8 1 2.9 2.3 10.5 Boys....................................................................................... 114 10.4 85 7.8 *36 3.3 Personal and domestic occupations....................................... fa cto ry and mechanical occupations.................................. Factory operative................................................... Shoe factory.................................................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades............ Other factory......................................................... Apprentice and helper—skilled trades.................... Clerical"occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods..................................................................................... Office w ork................................................. .................. Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work........................................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery......................... Selling......................................................................... All. other occupations.................................................................. 7 14 11 3 3 5 3 6 .7 6.4 1.4 8 4 3 1 2.4 2.1 1.4 Both sexes......................................................... Personal and domestic occupations.................................... Factory and mechanical occupations................................... Factory operative................................................................. Shoe factory.......................................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades.......... Other factory................................................................. Apprentice and helper— skilled trades........................ Clericaloccupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods....................................................................... Office w ork........................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.. . Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work................................................................. Messenger work, errand, and delivery......................... Selling............................................................ A ll other occupations................................................................ 8.5 7.9 4.3 7.9 4 11 9 1 2 6 2 Per cent.1 N um ber. 14 4 4 6 1 Per cent.1 9 .5 2 1 3.2 66 1 7.6 1.4 22 1 2.5 1.4 8.7 1 16 4 1 2.4 93 1 5 10.7 1.4 9.1 5 78 4 11.7 1 58 6 4 Girls....................................................................................... 58 6 .8 40 4.7 31 3.6 Personal and domestic occupations...................................... Factory and mechanical occupations................................... Factory operative............................................. Shoe factory........................................ Clothing factory and other needle trades............ Other factory................................. ................................ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................................................................. Office w ork................................................. Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, *and shipping-room work...................................................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery......................... Selling...................................................................................... 1 39 39 4 29 6 2 .0 9.2 9.2 3.1 16.4 5.2 19 11 11 2 5 4 37.3 2.6 2 .6 1.5 2 .8 3 .4 9 11 11 3 4 4 17.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.3 3.4 18 2 1 4.8 10 1 2.7 11 1 3 2.9 4 7 4 5.7 8 .0 2 i 4 2. Q l .i .6 4 5 4.6 1.9 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Including one position for which occupation was not reported. tions were the hours either under 36 or over 48 a week. In no occu pation except, perhaps, work as operatives in shoe factories, were the weekly hours of girls as generally within the limit of from 36 to 48, inclusive, as in cash and messenger work in department stores. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 270 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . The occupation in which the hours of boys varied most widely, with the single exception of personal and domestic occupations, was that classified as messenger, errand, and delivery work. In over one-fourth, 25.9 per cent, of all the positions for messenger, errand, and delivery work held by boys, as might be expected from the pre ceding discussion, the hours were either less than 36 or more than 48 weekly. The proportion of cases, 36.7 per cent, in which they were exactly 48 was somewhat larger than the proportion, 34.9 per cent, in which they were 36 but less than 48. The largest proportion of unusual hours for both boys and girls was found, as might be expected, in personal and domestic occupa tions. Of all the positions held by both sexes in these occupations only 16.9 per cent required exactly 48 hours and 14.6 per cent required 36 but less than 48 hours a week. In nearly one-half, 49.4 per cent, of these positions, and in over one-half, 51.1 per cent, of those held by girls, the weekly hours were either less than 36 or more than 48. PIECE AND TIME WORK. In about one-eighth, 12.6 per cent, of all their positions, as shown in Table 131, the children were engaged in piecework. Nearly fourfifths, 195 out of 244, of these positions were in factory and mechan ical occupations, 119 of them, or nearly one-half, being in shoe factones. The only other type of occupation in which any considerable proportion of positions involved piecework was 11packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work,” and in less than one-sixth, 15.4 per cent, of these positions, as compared with about one-third, 33.2 per cent, of those in factory and mechanical occupations and with nearly three-fifths, 59.8 per cent, of those in shoe factories alone, were the children engaged in piecework. Because of the decided tendency of girls to enter the occupations involving piecework a much larger proportion of the girls than of the boys, 19.9 per cent as compared with 6.9 per cent, held positions in which they were paid by the piece. The initial wages of both sexes combined were decidedly higher in time-work than in piecework positions. Table 132 shows that in 18.4 per cent of the piecework positions, as compared with only 3.5 per cent of the time-work positions, were wages less than $3 a week. In over three-fourths, 76.6 per cent, of the piecework positions, as compared with little more than two-thirds, 68. 3 per cent, of the tunework positions, were they less than $5. On the other hand, they were $5 or more in over one-fourth, 25. 6 per cent, of the time-work but less than one fifth, 19.7 per cent, of the piecework positions. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 271 O C C U P A T IO N S. T able 131.— K in d o f work, by occupation and sex o f child; regular p osition s held by children interview ed. Regular positions showing specified kind of work. Occupation and sex of child. Both sexes.......................................... A ll reg Time-work. N o cash Not Piecework. ular wage. reported. posi tions. N um Per N um Per N um Per N um Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent. ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 *1,943 1,632 84.0 244 12.6 42 Personal and domestic occupations....................... 89 74 83.1 Factory and mechanical occupations.................... 588 360 61.2 Factory operative............. ‘ ................................. 563 336 59.7 Shoe factory.......................................... 199 74 37.2 Clothing factory and other needle trades. 185 128 69.2 Other factory................................................ 179 134 74.9 Apprentice and helper—skilled trades........ 25 24 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.............................................. 1,248 1,184 94.9 Office work............................................. 101 98 97.0 Cash and messenger work— department store..................................... 213 213 100.0 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work............................................ 104 86 82.7 Messenger work, errand and delivery........... 754 730 96.8 Selling................ '........................ 76 57 75.0 A ll other occupations................................ 17 14 _____ B oys........................................... »1,093 991 90.7 12 195 195 119 35 41 13.5 33.2 34.6 59.8 18.9 22.9 1 18 17 3.1 15 15 15 8.1 7 Personal and domestic occupations................ Factory and mechanical occupations.................... Factory operative........... .*............................. Shoe factory...................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades. Other factory................................................ Apprentice and helper— skilled trades........ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................. Office work...................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.......................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work............................. _•........... Messenger work, errand and delivery.. Selling.............................. A ll other occupations.................. 12 44 44 32 1 11 26.7 31.4 46.4 18 2.1 10 8 1 1.5 Girls....................................... . . . . Personal and domestic occupations....................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................... Factory operative........... .*.............. Shoe factory.................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades. Other factory................................ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................ Office work................................. Cash and messenger w ork-departm ent store...................................... Packing, wrapping,labeling, and shippingroom work................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery........... Selling............................... 38 165 140 69 8 63 25 24 115 91 34 6 51 24 872 73 838 96.1 73 100.0 55 69.7 65.0 49.3 8Î.Ô 1.3 2.2 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.8 1.1 1 36 2.9 3.0 16 12 8 1 15.4 1.6 10.5 8 11 s 75 17.5 1.1 14.5 4 ^ 1 ■« ~ ■■ _ _s 3 1.8 1 1 1 1.6 7 1.1 1.9 .5 1.0 1.8 2.1 4 .3 55 100.0 34 667 43 17 34 646 30 14 850 641 75.4 51 423 423 130 177 116 50 245 245 40 122 83 98.0 57.9 57.9 30.8 68.9 71.6 151 151 87 34 30 376 28 346 25 92.0 18 4.8 158 158 100.0 16 2 22.9 2 .3 70 87 33 *25 _ 52 84 27 96.9 74.3 96.6 4 .6 i « t 169 1.6 35.7 1 15 2 .0 3 .5 3 .5 12 12 66.9 19.2 25.9 14 1 7.9 7 1 6 1.1 2.8 2.8 2.3 4.0 1.7 2.9 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. ? Including one position for which occupation was not reported. The best opportunities for girls to earn the higher rates of wages ¡appear, however, to have been in piecework positions. Although in only 9.3 per cent of the piecework as compared with 10 per cent of the time-work positions held by boys were the initial weekly https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 272 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, T a b l e 132.— In itia l weekly wage, by kind o f work and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interview ed. Regular positior s showing specifl ed kind of work. A l l regular positions. Time-work. Piecework. Initial weekly wage and sex. Both sexes........................................ N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. 1,943 1,302 103 413 786 No cash wage. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. 100.0 1,632 100.0 244 100.0 325 14Ö 127 49 67.0 5.3 21.3 40.5 23.9 16.7 7.2 6.5 2 .5 1,114 57 364 693 417 297 120 79 22 68.3 3.5 22.3 42.5 25.6 18.2 7 .4 4.8 1.3 187 45 49 93 48 28 20 6 3 76.6 18.4 20.1 38.1 19.7 11.5 8.2 2.5 1.2 1,093 100.0 991 100.0 75 100.0 16 660 39 135 486 355 249 106 57 21 60.4 3.6 12.4 44.5 32.5 22.8 9.7 5.2 1.9 608 28 123 457 335 236 99 38 10 61.4 2.8 12.4 46.1 33.8 23.8 10.0 3.8 1.0 52 11 12 29 20 13 7 3 69.3 14.7 16.0 38.7 26.7 17.3 9 .3 4.0 16 850 100.0 641 100.0 169 100.0 26 642 64 278 300 110 76 34 70 28 75.5 7 .5 32.7 35.3 12.9 8.9 4.0 8.2 3 .3 506 29 241 236 82 61 21 41 12 78.9 135 34 37 64 28 15 13 3 3 79.9 20.1 21.9 37.9 16.6 8.9 7.7 1.8 1.8 Not report ed. 42 25 Initial wage: Boys..................................................... 1 1 1 42 24 11 Initial wage: Girls.................................................... 11 Initial wage: 37.6 36.8 12.8 9 .5 3 .3 6 .4 1.9 14 1 1 26 13 1 Including 84 positions where support or meals were given as part or whole of wage; also positions where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay; and where child worked for less than 1 week piecework, or only one day each week. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O CC U PA T IO N S. 273 IN IT IA L W E E K L Y W A G E S . Taking both sexes together, the occupation in which the highest proportion of positions paid initial weekly wages of $5 or over, as shown in Table 133, was office work. In personal and domestic occu pations, selling, and work as operatives in clothing factories, the pro portions of positions in which the wages were not entirely in cash96 Were high, 42.7 per cent, 27.6 per cent, and 10.3 per cent, respec tively, and as a result the proportions in all other groups were com paratively low. With the exception of these three occupations, where the money classification can not be considered representative of the actual status, office work showed not only the highest propor tion of positions, 28.7 per cent, paying $5 or more, but also the lowest proportion, 65.3 per cent, paying less than $5. In only one such position were the wages less than $3, and that position was held by a girl. When boys alone are considered, however, factory and mechanical occupations had the highest proportion, 41.8 per cent, of positions paying $5 or more and the lowest proportion, 53.3 per cent, of posi tions paying less than $5. Although the number of apprentices and helpers in skilled trades is too small to justify the working of per centages, it appears that they contributed largely to this wage superiority of factory and mechanical occupations, for the propor tion of positions as factory operatives in which the wages of boys were over $5 was less, 39.3 per cent, than the proportion, 41.8 per cent, in all factory and mechanical occupations. For both sexes together the highest proportion, 27 per cent, of factory operative positions paying $5 or more was found in “ other factories/’ that is in factories other than those making shoes, clothing or textiles. In only one position in a factory or mechanical occupation held by a boy, and that a position as operative in a shoe factory where the work was doubtless paid by the piece, were the initial weekly wages less than $3. On the other hand, the initial weekly wages were $6 or over in 18.8 per cent of all positions held by boys in factory and mechanical occupations, but in only 16.4 per cent of the factory operative positions— again showing, not only the decided superiority in wages of factory and mechanical over any other class o f occupa tions, but also the special advantage of positions as apprentices and helpers in skilled trades. 96 Including positions where support or meals were given as part or whole of wage; also positions where https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 274 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTO N . T able 133.— In itia l w eekly wage, by occu pa tion and sex; regular position s held by children interview ed. Regular positions showing specified initial weekly wage. AH regu- Under $5. Occupation and sex. posi tions. Total.. Under $3. S3 under $4. $4 unt N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 ber. cent.1 B oth sexes................................... ...................... 21,943 1,302 Personal and domestic occupations....................... 89 Personal service (other than servants in the home)..................................................................... 46 House and home work........................................ 43 Factory and mechanical occupations.................... 588 Factory operative................................................. 563 Shoe factory.................................................... 199 Clothing factory and other needle trades 185 Textile m ill........ ............................................. 53 Other, factory.................................. ............... 126 Apprentice and helper— skilled trades.......... 25 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and de livery of goods.................................... . . „ ................ 1,248 Office work.............................................................. 101 Cash and messenger work— department sto r e .................................................................... 213 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping104 room w ork........................................................... Selling.............................................. .4....................... 76 Messenger work, errand, and d e liv e ry .... . . 754 A ll other occupations.................................................. 17 B o y s...................................................................... H,093 Personal and domestic occupations...................... Personal service (other than servants in the hom e).................................................................... House and home w ork....................................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................... Factory operative......... ..................................... Shoe factory.................................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades Textile m ill..................................................... Other factory.................................................. Apprentice and helper— skilled trades......... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................... .......................... Office! work................................ ..........' . . . . , ____ Cash and messenger work— department store..........,•....... .................................................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work........................................................ . Selling....................................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery........ . All other occupations........ ....................................... . Girls............................. ....................................... Personal and domestic occupations...................... Personal service (other than servants in the hom e)........................................................ House and home work............................ Factory and mechanical occupations____ Factory operative............... ................... . Shoe factory........................................ Clothing factory and other needle Textile m ill......................................... Other factory...................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods....................... ................. . Office w ork............................... ............... . Cash and messenger work—department store.............................. ....................................... . Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work........................................................... Selling...................................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery........ . 1N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 67.0 103 5.3 413 21.3 786 32.6 11 12.4 10 11.2 8 68.4 69.8 77.4 62.7 67.9 69.0 9 2 45 45 18 20 3 4 7.7 8.0 9.0 10.8 5.7 3.2 69.3 65.3 46 1 3.7 1.0 263 16 21.1 15.8 556 49 446 48.5 187 87.8 5 2.3 98 46.0 84 39.4 72 36 504 6 69.2 47.4 66.8 7 4 29 1 6.7 5.3 3.8 27 15 107 26.0 19.7 14.2 38 17 368 5 36.5 22.4 48.'8 660 60.4 39 3.6 135 12.4 486 44.5 29 21 8 402 393 154 116 36 87 9 865' 66 _ 38 16 35 3 165 140 69 8 22 41 25 15 1 88 79 44 2 14 19 9 872 73 550 47 63.1 64.4 55 42 76.4 34 43 667 17 14 19 428 6 850 642 75.5 51 13 25.5 11 40 423 423 130 177 31 85 6 7 314 314 110 114 22 68 74.2 74.2 84.6 64.4 2 2 44 44 17 20 3 4 376 28 315 19 83.8 158 145 70 33 87 58 17 76 7 1 1 1 23.8 24.5 19.1 26.5 24.5 30.2 6 7 53.3 56.4 63.8 5 5 140 138 38 49 13 38 2 .6 .7 1.4 5 1 26 24 15 64.2 80.0 1 3 26 1 3.4 3 15.8 17.1 21.7 61 54 28 2 10 14 7 37.0 38.6 40.6 103 8 11.8 11.0 417 39 47.8 53.4 10 18.2 32 58.2 11 8 327 5 3.9 2 g 75 11.2 64 7.5 278 32.7 300 35.3 4 7.8 4 7.8 5 9.8 4 1 156 156 70 45 10 31 36.9 36.9 53.8 25.4 139 10 37. ÌÓ.4 10.4 13.1 11.3 4,7 16 1 4.3 91.8 5 82.9 6 1 3 87.4 36.9 37.3 49.2 25.4 37.7 35.7 3 4 5 2 30 7 1 217 210 98 47 20 45 7 40.5 4 114 114 23 49 9 33 27. Ò 27.0 17.7 27.7 38.8 49.0 36. " 5 160 8 42.6 3.2 88 55.7 52 32.9 8.6 25 7 32 35.7 27 9 38.6 3.4 36.8 47.1 2 Including one position for which occupation was not reported. 275 Oc c u p a t i o n s . "T a b l e 133.— In itia l w eekly wage, by occu pa tion and sex; regular p osition s held by children interview ed —Concluded. Regular «positions showing specified initial weekly wage. $5 or over. Occupation and sex. Total. $5 under $6. N ot reported. $6 or over. N um - Per N u m - Per N um - Per N um - Per N um - Per ber. cen t.2 ber. cent.5 ber. cent.2 ber. cent.2 ber. cent.2 / B oth sexes............ ................................. 465 23.9 325 16.7 140 7 .2 127 6 .5 8 49 2.5 Personal and domestic occupations.......... Personal service (other than servants in the hom e)........................................... House and home w ork........................... Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative.................................... Shoe factory....................................... Clothing factory and other nee dle trades......................................... Textile m i l l . . .................................... Other factory..................................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades......................................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................. Office w ork....................... .......................... Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store............................. .............. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work............................ Selling........................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery. A ll other occupations......... ........................... 18 20.2 11 12.4 7 7.9 38 42.7 4 4.5 17 1 140 126 38 23.8 22.4 19.1 10 1 85 79 22 14.5 14.0 11.1 55 47 16 9.4 8.3 8.0 6 32 26 24 1 4.4 4.3 .5 2 2 20 20 6 3.4 3.6 3.0 40 14 34 21.6 26.4 27.0 25 13 19 13.5 24.5 15.1 15 1 15 8.1 1.9 11.9 19 10.3 4 3.2 10 3 1 5.4 5.7 .8 24.0 28.7 228 22 18.3 21.8 72 7 4 .8 5 .0 23 1 1.8 1.0 14 300 29 7 6 , 2 8 5.8 6 .9 60 5 20 9.4 18 8.5 2 .9 1 .5 5 2.3 27 19 205 7 26.0 25.0 27.2 18 11 159 1 17.3 14.5 21.1 9 8 46 6 8.7 10.5 6.1 1 21 32 3 1.0 27.6 4 .2 4 3.8 13 1 1.7 355 32.5 249 22.8 106 9.7 57 5.2 «21 1.9 13 ^Personal and domestic occupations.......... Personal service (other than servants 13 in 4 h e h o m e )........................................... House and home w ork........................... 69 41.8 Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative.......................... .......... 55 39.3 21 30.4 Shoe factory................. ..................... Clothing factory and other nee 5 dle trades........................................ 8 Textile m ill......................................... 21 Other factory..................................... Apprentice and helper—skilled trades........................................................ 14 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................. 266 30.5 Office w ork................................................. ' 24 . 32.9 Cash and messenger work— depart 12 21.8 m ent store............................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and 19 shipping-room work............................ Selling.......................................................... 14 197 29.5 Messenger work, errand, and delivery. 7 A ll other occupations..................................... 8 B oys........................................................... 5 5 8 38 32 12 7 23.0 22.9 17.4 2 7 11 31 23 9 18.8 16.4 13.0 8 64 7 7.3 9.6 10 18.2 2 3.6 22.6 1.8 2.1 4.3 4 .8 1.4 14 1 1.6 1.4 1 1.8 4.5 12 1 1.8 2 23.2 23.3 4 5 46 6 3 3 3 1 202 17 15 9 151 1 2 3.0 2.1 1.4 1 3 1 10 6 5 2 5 3 1 2 6.9 42 1 1 10 30 3 Girls........................................................... 110 12.9 76 8.9 34 4.0 70 8 .2 28 3.3 Personal and domestic occupations.......... Personal service (other than servants in the h om e)....................................... House and home w ork........................... Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative.................................... Shoe factory......... .....:...................... Clothing factory and other nee dle trades......................................... Textile m ill......................................... Other factory....... ....................... .. . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................. Office work . 1 ............................................. Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store..................... j ....................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work............................ Selling........................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery. 5 9.8 3 5.9 2 3.9 31 60.8 2 3.9 4 1 71 71 17 16.8 16.8 13.1 2 1 47 47 10 11.1 11.1 7.7 24 24 7 1 30 21 21 5.0 5.0 2 17 17 3 4.0 4.0 2.3 35 6 13 23 6 8 13.0 12 6.8 18 10.2 9.4 5 5.9 3 3.5 10 3 1 5.6 15.3 26 5 6.9 8 2.1 18 4 4 .8 9 2.4 1 .6 5 3 7.1 34 5 19.8 9.0 2 8 5.1 8 5.1 8 5 8 11.4 3 2 8 4.3 9.2 9.2 5.7 5.7 5.4 11 2 2.3 1.2 4 2.5 4 5.7 1 1.1 1 Including positions where support or meals were given as part or whole of wage; also positions where child worked for nothing or employer failed to pay; and where he worked for less than one week on piece work or only one day each week. * Not shown where base is less than 50. * Including one position for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 276 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . Even for girls, less than one-tenth, 9 per cent, of all positions in the entire group of clerical and other similar occupations, as com pared with about one-sixth, 16.8 per cent, of positions in the group of factory and mechanical occupations, paid initial weekly wages of $5 or more. Though the proportion of shoe factory positions held by girls in which these wages were paid was somewhat smaller, 13.1 per cent, that of positions in clothing factories and other needle trades was even larger, 19.8 per cent, than for the group as a whole. In more than half, 53.8 per cent, of the positions held by girls in shoe factories the initial weekly wages were $4 but less than $5. At the same time the wide range of wages paid to girls in these occu pations is shown by the fact that in about one-tenth, 10.4 per cent, of all their positions in factory and mechanical occupations, in more than one-eighth, 13.1 per cent, of those in shoe factories, and in about one-ninth, 11.3 per cent, of those in clothing factories and other needle trades, their weekly wages were less than $3. Upon the whole, however, the weekly wages paid girls in factory and mechanical occupations were comparatively high— a fact which should be considered in connection with the fact already mentioned that these were the occupations in which piece work was common, and with the further fact that girls received higher wages in piecework than in timework positions. Wages for cash and messenger work in department stores were lower than in any other occupation. The most common wage for this occupation was $3 but less than $4, which was paid in almost half, 46 per cent, of all the positions held by both sexes and in con siderably more than one-half, 55.7 per cent, of those held by girls. Moreover, wages of less than $5 were paid in nearly nine-tenths, 87.8 per cent, of all positions and in over nine-tenths, 91.8 per cent, of those held by girls. Even the boys, whose wages ranged con siderably higher than those of the girls, received less than $5 in over three-fourths, 76.4 per cent, of all their positions for cash and messenger work in department stores— a larger proportion than in any other occupation. Messenger, errand, and delivery work was the next lowest paid occupation for girls; but for boys the occupations thus classified were more varied in character and probably included more responsible positions than for girls, and as a result the wages of boys in these occupations compared more favorably with their wages in other pursuits. Girls received less than $5 in nearly as large a proportion, 87.4 per cent, of these positions, as in their positions for cash an messenger work in department stores, but boys received these wage https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U P A T IO N S. 277 in less than two-thirds, 64.2 per cent, of the positions they occupied. ^Nevertheless, even the wages of boys were lower in messenger, errand, and delivery work positions than in all occupations classified as “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods” ; and, as has been seen, they were lower in the latter group than in factory and mechanical occupations. Although between $4 and $6 was the most common wage received by hoys, as well as by both sexes combined, the most common wage received by girls was between $3 and $5. In more than half the positions in all the occupations in which more than 50 positions were held by girls these were the wages. The proportion of positions in cash and messenger work in department stores in which girls re ceived $3 but less than $5 was nearly nine-tenths, 88.6 per cent; in messenger, errand, and delivery work it was considerably over fourfifths, 83.9 per cent; and it was about three-fourths, 75.3 per cent, in “ other factory” operative positions, and almost as high, 74.3 per cent, in packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work. C H A N G E IN W E E K L Y W A G E S . The changes in weekly wages in all positions which lasted for •three months or more, except for positions involving piece work where changes in wages could not be accurately secured, are shown in Table 134. In over half, 51.3 per cent, of all these positions, it appears, there was no change in weekly wages, and in 6.7 per cent of them wages were fluctuating. But in two-fifths, 40.5 per cent, the children’s wages were increased, and in over one-fourth, 28.6 per cent, the increases amounted to $1 or more a week. In a larger proportion of the positions held by boys than by girls, 53.3 per cent as compared with 47.3 per cent, there was no change. At the same time a larger proportion of the positions held by boys than of those held by girls, 43.2 per cent as compared with 35.4 per cent, showed increases. This difference, however, should be considered in connection with the fact that in 16.3 per cent of the positions held by girls and only 1.7 per cent of those held by boys the wages were fluctuating. In only two positions, both of them held by boys and both among the occupations classified as messenger, errand, and delivery work, was there a decrease in wages. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 278 T a b l e 134.— Change in weekly wage, by occupation and sex; tim e work position s held three m onths and over by children interview ed. * Regular positions showing specified change in weekly wage in time work. Occupation, duration of position, and sex N o change. Increasing. N ot reported or inapplicable. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 51.3 2 0.2 58 Both se x e s.................................................................... S66 444 38 176 159 17 31 80 68 12 647 69 75 433 70 5 330 36 31 224 39 3 51.0 52.2 41.3 51.7 55.7 B o y s ............................. 1................................................. 572 305 53.3 Personal and domestic occupations...........: ................... Factory and mechanical occupations............................. Factory operative............. *............................................ Apprentice and helper— skilled trades................... Clerical*occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................................................................... Office work........................................................................ 11 63 46 17 9 34 22 12 493 53 24 376 40 259 25 11 198 25 3 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Fluctuating. Total. Personal and domestic occupations................................ Factory and mechanical occupations.............................. Factory operative............. 1 ........................................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades................. J Clericaloccupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................................................................... Office work.................................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store__ Messenger work, errand, and delivery.................... Other................................................................................... A ll othdr occupations............................................................ Messenger work, errand, and delivery....... ............ Other................................................................................... A ll other occupations............................................................ Diminishing. 42.8 2 .3 2 .5 2 .3 52.5 47.2 52.7 2 2 $1 and over. N um ber. Per cent.1 Num ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 40.5 103 11.9 248 28.6 11 1.3 36.4 37.1 2 18 18 10.2 11.3 4 46 41 5 26.1 25.8 2 2 1.1 1.3 9 1.4 9 2.1 6 .7 351 1 30 30 17.0 18.9 6 64 59 5 27 1, 1 14 11 4.2 1.4 1.3 3.2 15.7 279 32 43 184 20 2 43.1 46.4 57.3 42.5 28.6 83 6 10 61 6 12.8 8.7 13.3 14.1 8.6 196 26 33 123 14 2 30.3 37.7 440 28.4 20.0 10 1.7 247 43.2 70 12.2 177 30.9 i 3 3 4 .8 .4 7 1.4 .5 1 5 1 L3 54.0 Under 31. 2 26 21 5 217 28 12 163 14 2 41.3 4 4 6.3 44.0 52.8 66 5 4 52 5 13.4 9.4 43.4 13.8 2 22 17 5 151 23 8 111 9 2 8 1.4 ......... 34.9 30.6 43.4 S 1 .6 29.5 S 2 .1 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . All regular posi" lions show ing time work. Regular positions showing specified change in weekly wage in time work. Girls Personal and domestic occupations................................. Factory and mechanical occupations............................. Factory operative............. ............................................. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................................................................. Officework............ ................... ....................................... Cash and messenger work— department sto re .. . Messenger work, errand, and delivery.................... Other............................... ...................... .............. O C C U P A T IO N S. 279 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 280 THE W O R K I N G C H IL D R E N OF B O S T O N . For boys, office work was the occupation which showed the largest proportion of positions in which wages were increased, considering, only occupations in which boys held as many as 50 positions. Over one-half, 52.8 per cent, of all office positions held by boys showed wage increases. These increases were comparatively substantial, for in more than two-fifths, 43.4 per cent, of all these positions the boys’ wages were raised $1 or more. The increases given boys in messenger, errand, and delivery work positions were smaller. In 43.4 per cent of these positions the wages were increased, but in only 29.5 per cent of them did the increases amount to $1 or more. Both these occupations, as will be remembered, had high proportions of positions lasting three months or longer, and office work had a particularly high proportion lasting more than a year. In a some what larger proportion of positions held by boys in clerical and other similar occupations than in factory and mechanical occupations, 44 per cent, as compared with 41.3 per cent, were the wages increased, but increases of $1 or more were given in a larger proportion of the factory and mechanical than of the clerical and other similar occu pations, 34.9 per cent as compared with 30.6 per cent.. The occupation in which girls received their lowest initial wages, cash and messenger work in department stores, was the one in which^ they received increases in the highest proportion, 60.8 per cent, of their positions. Moreover, in almost one-half, 49 per cent, of these positions they received increases of $1 or more. As will be remem bered, more than half of the positions in this occupation were only temporary and were held less than three months, but the girls who secured fairly permanent positions evidently fared better than their low initial wages would seem to indicate. Partly, at least, because of the frequency with which their wages were increased in cash and messenger work in department stores girls received wage increases in about two-fifths, 40.3 per cent, of their positions in clerical and other similar occupations, as compared with little more than onethird, 33.6 per cent, of their positions in all factory and mechanical occupations. R E A S O N S F O R L E A V IN G P O S IT IO N S . Table 135 gives, for the children interviewed, the reasons for leaving all terminated positions in the different occupations. The most conspicuous point shown in this table is the large proportion of positions for cash and messenger work in department stores from which the children were “ laid off.” This was given as the reason for leaving almost seven-eighths, 85.5 per cent, of all these position® and nearly nine-tenths, 89.7 per cent, of those held b y girls. A girls held 74.2 per cent of all these positions 97 this explains the larger proportion of positions held by girls than by boys, as already noted, from which the children were laid off. The large number of girls « See Table 116, p. 230. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATION'S. 281 who were employed in temporary positions in department stores, for sales or at other rush times, also explains, at least in part, why the girls held more positions and had more unemoloyment than did the bpys. Another conspicuous point in the table is the small proportion, only 18.1 per cent, of all terminated positions for work as operatives in shoe factories from which the children were laid off. This, how ever, may be rather an apparent than a real showing, for at least one large Boston shoe factory made a practice of keeping children on its pay roll through slack seasons, requiring them to report fre quently if not every day, but giving them little or no work. As already stated, a great part of the shoe factory work of children is done on a piece price basis. The result of this policy was that the children were not discharged but that during such periods thenwages amounted to little or nothing. Only a small proportion of shoe factory positions were left because the children were laid off but a large proportion, 48.9 per cent, were left because they were not satisfactory, the chief cause of dissatisfaction being the low earnings In only three occupations were more than two-fifths of the ter minated positions held by children ended by their discharge. These were cash and messenger work in department stores already men tioned, “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work,” in which 44.1 per cent of all positions were thus terminated, and work as operatives in clothing factories and other needle trades in which the proportion was 42.5 per cent. The term “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room w ork” includes positions in a considerable number of industries, many of them more or less seasonal in character, and work in clothing factories is distinctly seasonal. It appears probable, therefore, that in the majority of cases in which children were laid off their discharge was not due to any fault of theirs but to the character of the industry in which they were employed. The chief reason for leaving positions in personal and domestic occupations and in messenger, errand, and delivery work, as well as in shoe factories, was dissatisfaction on the part of the children. Of all the terminated positions in personal and domestic occupations 44.1 per cent, and of all those in messenger, errand, and delivery work 42.3 per cent were left for this reason. The positions ended because of the requirement that the children attend continuation school, which constituted only 2.1 per cent f all terminated positions, were fairly evenly distributed among the various occupations. The only noteworthy fact about those which were left in order to return to school, constituting 1.7 per cent of all terminated positions, is the comparatively large proportions in shoe factories and in “ packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room w ork,” 4.3 per cent and 3.4 per cent, respectively. 4 9 4 7 0 °— 22------ 19 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 282 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON, T a b l e 135.— Reason fo r leaving position, by occupation and sex o f child; regular positions left by children interviewed. Regular positions left for specified reason. Occupation and sex. A ll regular posi tions left.1 Laid oil. N um ber. Position not satisfactory.2 Continuation school. Per cent.3 N um ber. Per cent.3 N um ber. Per cent.3 25 2.1 8 7 2 1 4 1 2.5 2.2 2.1 .9 3.8 17 2 2.2 A ll occupations— both sexes............. <1,170 483 41.3 429 36.7 Personal and domestic occupations........... Factory and mechanical occupations........ Factory operative............... .............. Shoe factory.............. ............. .......... Clothing factory and other needle trades Other factory................................................ Apprentice and helper— skilled trades____ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods......................... ............. ....... ..... Office work........................ ................................... Cash and messenger work—department store..................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom work......................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery____ Selling..................................................................... A ll other occupations............................................... N ot reported............................................ ................... 68 * 325 313 94 113 106 12 18 106 103 17 48 38 3 26.5 32.6 32.9 18.1 42.5 35.8 30 130 127 46 39 42 3 44.1 40.0 40.6 48.9 34.5 39.6 762 46 353 24 46.3 263 13 34.5 152 130 85.5 14 9.2 59 447 58 <■ 14 1 26 152 21 6 44.1 34.0 36.2 23 189 24 6 39.0 42.3 41.4 2 13 3.4 2.9 <646 231 35.8 262 40.6 16 2.5 29 94 82 34 5 43 12 9 31 28 6 3 19 3 37.2 39.0 3 2 1 3.2 2.4 508 27 185 13 35 25 8 14 400 32 14 5 130 12 6 7 175 15 6 524 252 39 231 231 60 108 63 9 75 75 11 45 19 254 19 168 11 66.1 117 105 89.7 45 47 26 21 22 9 Occupations—boys..................................... Personal and domestic occupations..................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................. Factory operative..................... ........................ Shoe factory.................................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades Other factory................................................. Apprentice and helper— skilled trades......... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods...................................................... Office work............................................................. Cash and messenger work— department store..................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work................................................ Messenger work, errand, and delivery........ Selling..................................................................... A ll other occupations.................................... ........... Occupations— girls.......................................... Personal and domestic occupations.................Cl Factory and mechanical occupations.................. Factory operative.............................................. Shoe factory.................................................. Clothing factory and other needle trades Other factory........ ....................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.................................................... Office work............................................................ Cash and messenger work—department store..................................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shippingroom w ork.......................................................... Messenger work, errand, and delivery____ Selling.......................................................... ........... 33.0 34.1 36.4 32.5 10 35 32 15 2 15 3 211 6 Jfifi 1 1 41.5 13 2 2.6 43.8 1 10 2.5 48.1 167 31.9 9 1.7 32.5 32.5 18.3 41.7 30.2 20 95 95 31 37 27 41.1 41.1 51.7 34.3 42.9 5 5 1 1 3 2.2 2.2 1.7 .9 4.8 52 7 20.5 4 1.6 6 5.1 16 14 9 1 3 1 That is, omitting entirely those not left. 2 Disliked work or place, no advancement, low wages, work too hard or hours long, secured better position. 8 Not shown where base is less than 50. 4 Including one position for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U PA TIO N S. 283 T a b l e 135.- -R ea so n for leaving position , by occupation and sex o f child; regular posi tions left by children interviewed— Concluded. F Regular positions left for specified reason. Occupation and sex. Returned to school. N um ber. A ll occupations— both sexes...................................... 20 Per cent.1 1.7 Other reasons. N ot reported. N um ber. N um ber. Per cent.1 »34 2.9 179 Personal and domestic occupations........................ Factory and mechanical occupations___ Factory operative................................ ” * ” Shoe feictory..................... ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ................... Clothing factory and other needle trades... "Other factory......... ................. Apprentice and helper— skilled t r a d e s .......... «roods wrapping, selling and delivery of Per cent.1 15.3 26.5 20.0 19.5 22.3 19.5 17.0 Office w ork........................... I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! ! ................. Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room 8.5 15.4 17.2 Messenger work, errand, and delivery........................ Selling........................................................ _ .................. A ll othfer occupations.................... N ot reported................ ........... Occupations—boys............................. Personal and domestic occupations............................ - actory and mechanical occupations................... Factory operative................................ ................................ Shoe factory..............1! ! ! ! ! " " * ................. ......... Other factory......................... ....................................... Apprentice and helper— skilled t r a d e s .................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and deiiverv’ of goods.......................................... ................ J Office w ork............................................................................ Cash and messenger w ork-departm ent store. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room Messenger work, errand, and deiiverv........................ Selling............................... ...................................................... A ll other occupations...................... ........................................... Occupations— girls..................................... Personal and domestic occupations....................... Factory and mechanical occupations................. Factory operative................................ Shoe factory........................... ” ] ” ! ......................... Clothing factory and other needle trades......... Other factory................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping,' selling, ’ and deiiverv of goods.......................................................... J Office w ork............................. ............................................. . Cash and messenger w ork-departm ent store!........ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room' work.......................................................... ° Messenger work, errand, and deiiverv........ Selling...................................................................................... 1 Not shown where base is less than 50. s Including one -position f or which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2.0 105 16.3 2.9 20.2 18.3 1.8 14.8 1.5 16.3 1.3 74 14.1 19.9 19.9 21.7 20.4 17.5 2.0 7.5 3.0 14 3.5 2.9 SICKNESS AND ACCIDENTS. All the children included in this study were supposed to have had physical examinations before receiving their employment certifi cates. As this examination could be given b y a family or school physician, as well as by a physician appointed for this purpose, no uniformity could be expected between different cities in the matter of records as to the physical condition of children when they went to work. In Boston, where nearly all the children were examined by the physician at the certificate office, a uniform record form was used. An attempt was made, therefore, to secure from these forms, for the Boston children included in the study, information as to the physical defects with which they went to work or which may have been noted when they applied for second or later certificates;, but the files had not been carefully kept and the physical examination records were missing for so many children that this attempt had to be abandoned. The physical examination given when a child applied lor per mission to go to work rarely resulted, at the time of this study, in the refusal of a certificate; and the cases in which the certificate was even temporarily withheld on account of lack of vaccination or. because of evidence of a communicable disease were almost as rare as refusals. At the certificate office it was stated that the chief reason for this was that children with physical disabilities rarely applied as they knew that they would not be granted certificates. Many of the children interviewed reported to agents of the bureau that they had not been told, of minor physical defects which the physician had noted on the physical examination form and about which the agents questioned them. In no case was a certificate withheld until any minor trouble, such as defective teeth or eye sight, was corrected. ' . . , , Little attention was paid in the physical examination to the occupation in which the child expected to be employed. The shifts in occupation which, as previously stated, occurred during em ployment in a single position»8 did not, therefore,have the practical importance that they would have had if more distinction had been made in the first place between occupations. Although children were supposed to be reexamined when the returned for later certificates, the records of the certificate office afforded no information as to the effects, upon their health, of the 98 See p p . 258-261. 284 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis S IC K N E S S A N D A C C ID E N T S. 285 various occupations in which they had been engaged. The Massa chusetts General Hospital had at the time of this study begun to keep separate records of all persons, children as well as adults, treated for diseases resulting from their occupations. But these records included only cases in which the ill effects of an occupation were so acute as to necessitate treatment and in which the patient applied for assistance to the Massachusetts General Hospital. The only information secured in regard to sickness among the children studied which could be utilized as the basis of any statistical statement was obtained by questioning the 823 children who were interviewed in regard to illnesses that had occurred between the time they took their first regular positions and the date of the interview. This information, of course, has no medical value, as it is based upon the child’s statement of his own case, but it does furnish a rough estimate as to ther number of cases, the probable causes, and the amount of time lost through sickness. , At the same time that the children were questioned about sick ness, they were asked whether they had suffered from any accident and, if so, what was the cause and how much time they had lost from their work. The information thus secured related not only to accidents which occurred in the course of their work but also to accidents which had no connection with their work. To supplement this information the records of the Massachusetts Accident Board were searched for reports of accidents to any of the 823 children interviewed. These records, since they were based on reports by employers, related only to accidents which were in sòme way con nected with places of employment. Not all accidents thus reported occurred in the course of employment. An employer would report, for example, an accident resulting from a scuffle between two boys during their lunch hour if it occurred on his premises. In a few cases it was found that children failed to tell the bureau agents of accidents which their employers had reported to the accident board, and in others they told of accidents which had not been reported. But in practically all cases of either kind of discrepancy the accident was trival in character. The number of cases of either sickness or accident reported by the 823 children interviewed, according to Table 136, was 424. Of these considerably more than one-fourth, 28.1 per cent, were due to colds, grippe, or sore throat," and about one-fifth, 20.3 per cent, to acci dents. More than one-tenth of all thè cases were due to eye diseases <and eye defects," which showed 11.8 per cent, and to headache and neuralgia, which showed. 10.6 per cent. Digestive disorders caused 7.1 per cent of the cases, skin diseases., boils, and abscesses 5.7 per 99 This was during an ordinary period, so for as colds, grippe, etc., are concerned, as it was before the in fluenza epidemic. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 286 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . cent, and toothache 2.6 per cent. No other single cause or related group of causes was responsible for as many as 10 cases of sicknes or accident. Of the 424 cases, 241 occurred to boys and 183 to girls. Sixty-three of the cases among the boys, however, were due to acci dents, which caused only 23 of those occurring among the girls. On the other hand, 178 of the cases of sickness occurred to boys, while 160 occurred to girls. Comparing these figures with the number of boys and girls who were interviewed in regard to sickness or acci dents, it appears that the boys were much more likely to suffer from accidents but somewhat less likely to suffer from sickness than were the girls. T a b l e 136.— Nature o f case, by sex o f child; cases o f sickness or accident reportedby children interviewed. Num ber of cases of sickness or accident to— Both sexes. Girls. Boys. Nature of case. N um ber. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Per N um cent distri ber. bution. Per cent distri bution. Total...................................................................................... 424 100.0 241 100.0 183 100.0 Nature reported........................................ ................................... Cold, grippe, sore throat____: ......................................... Injuries b y accident............................................................ E y e diseases and eye defects............................................ Headache and neuralgia.................................................... Digestive disorders............................................................... Skin diseases, boils, and abscesses................................ Toothache............................................................................... Pneumonia and bronchitis............................................... Ear diseases................................................ .......................... Heart trouble........................................................................ 409 119 86 50 45 30 24 11 8 6 4 3 3 20 15 96.5 28.1 20.3 11.8 10.6 7.1 5.7 2.6 1.9 1.4 .9 .7 .7 4.7 3.5 233 65 63 26 19 21 12 7 4 4 2 96.7 27.0 26.1 10.8 7.9 8.7 5.0 2.9 1.7 1.7 .8 176 54 23 24 26 9 12 4 4 2 2 3 96.2 29.5 12.6 13.1 14.2 4.9 6.6 2.2 2.2 1.1 1.1 1.6 3 7 8 1.2 2.9 3.3 13 7 7.1 3.8 Other diseases........................................................................ Nature not reported................ ................................................... In proportion to the number of girls, all the diseases which caused more than 10 cases of sickness, except digestive disorders and tooth ache, occurred more frequently among them. Although girls con stituted only 42 per cent of the children who were interviewed, they had 45.4 per cent of the cases of colds, grippe, or sore throat, 48 per cent of those of eye diseases and eye defects, 50 per cent of those of skin diseases, boils and abscesses, and 57.8 per cent of those of headache and neuralgia. The boys, however, appear to have been more liable to suffer from digestive disorders and from toothache than the girls. Of the 30 cases of digestive disorders 21, and of the 11 cases of tooth*, ache 7, occurred to boys. These numbers, however, are small. The amount of time lost: from work on account of sickness or accident was small as compared with the amount lost by reason of unemployment. Table 137 shows that the children who had been at work for one year or more had lost through sickness or accidents https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 287 S IC K N E S S A N D A CC ID E N T S. only 2.6 per cent of their time, the boys somewhat less than the .girls, 2.4 per cent as compared with 3 per cent. The children who had been at work less than a year, most of whom were younger at the time of the interview than those in the other group, had lost 4.1 per cent of their working time; and in this group the boys had lost more time than the girls, 4.6 per cent as compared with 3.3 per cent. This does not mean, of course, that these children were in perfect health during all the remainder of the time between the dates when they took their first regular positions and when they were inter viewed. Some of the cases of sickness and accident reported were too trivial to cause loss of time from work. These two groups of children were unemployed, respectively, during 14.4 per cent and 13.3 per cent of their time, and no illness or accident which occurred during a period of unemployment— that is, between two different positions— was considered to have caused loss of time from work, even though it might have prevented the child from securing another position as soon as he would otherwise have done. The somewhat greater amount of unemployment among the children who had been at work for a year or more may have contributed to the smaller proportion of time which they lost on account of sickness or accident. It is probable that with greater length of industrial experience children tend more frequently to disregard minor ailments and continue at their work. T a b l e 137.— Tim e lost on account o f sickness or accident, by length o f industrial history and sex; children interviewed. Percentage of time lost on account of sickness or accident of— Sex. Children Children who had who had been at been at work less work 1 than 1 year or year. oyer. 4.1 4.6 3.3 2.6 2.4 3.0 SICKNESS. According to Table 138, more than one-third, 36 per cent, of all he children interviewed— 34.6 per cent of the boys and 37.9 per cent of the girls—reported at least 1 case of sickness. Of the 296 children who reported sickness, moreover, 34 reported two and 4 three cases. Only a little over three-fourths, 76 per cent, of these children, however— including 32 of the 34 who reported 2 and all 4 of those who reported 3 cases— stated that they had lost time https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 288 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON. from work on account of sickness. All 4 of the children who reported 3 cases of sickness and 21 of the 34 who reported 2 cases were girls T a b l e 138.— Cases o f sickness per child and tim e lost fr o m w ork, by sex ; children in ter view ed. Children. Sex. Total. sick ness. Both sexes: 823 100.0 527 64.0 Losing time from work on account of sickness: 225 100.0 Losing no tim e from work on account of sickness: Boys: Losing time from work on account of sickness: Losing tim e from work on account of sickness: Losing no tim e from work on account of sickness: Total. 1 case. 2 cases. 3 cases. 296 36.0 258 31.3 34 4.1 4 0.5 225 100.0 189 840 32 14.2 4 1.8 1 0.2 1 591 100.0 7 527 89.2 64 0 10.8 7 63 10.7 6 477 100.0 312 65.4 165 34 6 152 31.9 13 2.7 130 100.0 117 90.0 13 10.0 130 100.0 Losing no tim e from work on account of sickness: Girls: Reporting sickness. Re port ing . 347 100.0 312 89.9 35 10.1 35 10.1 „ 346 100.0 215 62.1 131 37.9 106 30.6 21 6.1 4 ' 1.2 95 100.0 72 75.8 19 20.0 4 4.2 29 11.9 7 28 11.5 6 1 0.4 1 95 100.0 244 100.0 7 215 88.1 For more than one-fourth, 26.3 per cent, of their cases of sickness the children, according to Table 139, reported no working time lost. Although the girls had more cases than the boys, a smaller propor tion of their cases resulted in loss of time. Only about two-thirds, 66.9 per cent, of the cases of sickness reported by girls, as compared with about three-fourths, 75.3 per cent, of those reported by boys, resulted in loss of time from work. T a b l e 139.— T im e lost fr o m work o n account o f sickness, by sex o f child; cases o f sickness reported by children interview ed. Cases of sickness reported b y — Both sexes. Girls. Boys. T im e lost from work on account of sickness. Cases. T o t a l.. . N o tim e l o s t .. Some time lost N ot reported.. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Per cent distri bution. 338 241 26.3 71.3 2 .4 Cases. Per cent distri bution. Cases. 178 100.0 160 24.7 75.3 Per cen ' distri bution. 100.0 28.1 66 9 5 0 289 S IC K N E S S A N D AC C ID E N T S. ACCIDENTS. The 86 accidents already mentioned occurred, as shown in Table 140, to 66 children, 51 boys and 15 girls. Of these children 59 reported only 1 case of accident each, but 3 boys and 1 girl reported 2 cases each, and 2 boys and 1 girl reported 3 or more cases each. About one-twelfth, 8 per cent, of the children interviewed— more than one-tenth, 10.7 per cent, of the boys but less than one-twentieth, 4.3 per cent, of the girls— had had accidents of some sort. T a b l e 140.— Num ber o f cases o f accident jper child and time lost from work, by sex; children interviewed. Both sexes. Total. Num ber of cases of accidents. Boys. Losing time from work on account of accidents. Girls. Losing time from work on account of accidents. Total. Total. Losing time from work on account of acci dents. Per Per Per Not Not cent Num re N u m cent re N u m cent dis Yes. N o. dis Yes. No. dis Yes. No. ber. port ber. port ber. tribu tribu tribu ed. ed. tion. tion. tion. A ll ch ild re n .... Reporting no acci dents............................ Reporting accidents.. 1 case................. .. 2 cases...................... 3 or more cases. . . 823 100.0 757 66 59 4 92.0 8.0 7.2 .5 3 42 42 38 2 2 779 2 757 22 21 2 2 1 477 ioo.o 35 426 51 46 3 .2 35 33 1 1 89.3 10.7 9.6 .6 ..4 440 2 426 14 13 2 2 1 346 100.0 331 15 13 i i •4 9$ 7 4.3 3 8 .3 .3 7 339 7 8 1 1 As in the cases of sickness, not all these accidents resulted in loss of time from work. In nearly one-third, 32.6 per cent, of all the cases of accident, according to Table 141, no time was lost. Twenty of these accidents occurred to boys and eight to girls. The girls and boys apparently differed little in the proportions of their accidents which resulted in loss of time. T a b l e 141.— Tim e lost from work on account o f accident, by sex o f child; accidents re ported by children interviewed. Accidents to— Both sexes. B oys. Tim e lost from work on account of accident. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. Total___ 86 N o time lo s t ... Some tim e lost N ot reported.. 28 55 3 1 R ate not shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. 100.0 63 100.0 23 32.6 64.0 3 .5 20 40 3 31.7 63.5 4 .8 8 15 G irls.1 290 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O STO N . Not all these accidents, it should be remembered, occurred m the course of employment. Table 142 shows that not far from one, fourth, 23.3 per cent, of all the accidents and about three-tenths, 30.2 per cent, of those reported hy boys, occurred when the children were not at work. . Sixty accidents occurred while the children were at work— 38 ot them to boys and 22 to girls. Most of the accidents to girls, 17 out of the 22, but only 9 of the accidents to boys, were due to machinery. This comparatively large number of accidents to girls from machinery is doubtless due to the fact that to a greater extent than boys they were employed in machine work.1 Elevators and vehicles, which caused no accidents to girls, caused, respectively, 3 and 6 accidents to boys, while hand tools caused 4 accidents to boys and only 1 to a girl. T a b l e 1 4 2 . - T im e and cause o f accident, by sex o f child; accidents reported by children interview ed. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW. At the time this study was made two agencies were responsible for the enforcement of the child-labor laws of Massachusetts, local school authorities and inspectors of the State board of labor and industries. The local school authorities had two tasks, that of issuing employment and educational certificates and that of following up children to see that the compulsory school and continuationschool attendance laws were enforced. The issuing of certificates, as earlier stated, was a function of the superintendent of schools or some one deputized by him for that purpose. The enforcement of attendance was a function of the school attendance officers who worked under the direction of the superintendent of schools. The inspectors of the State board of labor and industries, on the other hand, were expected to see that no children under 14 were employed, that employment certificates were on file for children between 14 and 16, and educational certificates for those between 16 and 21 years of age, and that children were not employed in occupations or lo r hours prohibited by law. They also enforced other laws which affected both adults and children, especially those relating to safety and sanitation. The method of issuing certificates has already been sufficiently described. It should be noted in connection with the subject of law enforcement that a certificate office is not merely an agency for issuing permits to leave school for work, but is itself part of the enforcement machinery, not only of the child-labor laws but also of the compulsory school-attendance laws. The chief function of the certificate office is to see that children do not enter industry who have not attained the age and school standing required by law or who are not physically able to work. But this office also receives from employers the certificates of children who have left their positions or been discharged and who therefore should return to school unless they secure new positions and new certificates. Its records, too, furnish the principal source of information as to children who should be attending continuation school. Keeping children under 16 years of age in school does not, of course, prevent them from being employed illegally during vacations or yutside of school hours. Nevertheless, the occupations in which hey can engage while in regular attendance at school are comaratively limited, and strict enforcement of the compulsory schoolattendance law is of material assistance in preventing illegal employ ment. The work of attendance officers, therefore, both in preventing https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 292 TH E W ORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. children enrolled in school from leaving without legal excuseeither an employment certificate or a special home permit— and i, securing the enrollment of newcomers to the city, is another part of the machinery for enforcing the child-labor law. In Boston at the time of this study if a child under 16 years of age left school without having obtained either a transfer card to another school, a special home permit, or a school record to present in apply ing for an employment certificate, the teacher was required to send a formal notification to the chief attendance officer. This official assigned the case to the attendance officer in charge of the district in which the school was located. The city was divided into 21 such districts, with a corresponding number of attendance officers. When the child had been located and the cause of absence ascer tained a report was sent back to the teacher for his information. Private and parochial as well as public schools, it was said, notified the attendance department of absences. Children who secured school records as a preliminary to applying for employment certificates were not discharged from school until after the certificates were actually issued. In order to insure that such a child did not drop out without securing a certificate the school records were made out in duplicate and one copy was forwarded t; the superintendent of schools. When the child’s certificate had actually been issued this copy, indorsed on the back with the date of issuance and the signature of the issuing officer, was returned to the school by the attendance officer and only then was the child supposed to be dropped from the school register. Children who did not apply for certificates within about? 10 days after having received "their sòhool records were investigated by attendance officers. In Jcase the certificate was refused that fact was noted on the back of the school record which then constituted a notice not to discharge thè child and in addition the attendance officer was expected to see that the child returned to school. In locating children who had never been enrolled in school in Boston no use was made of the school census, but attendance officers occasionally made canvasses of their districts. They also made regular visits to the office of the Immigration Service to secure the names and addresses of children coming from abroad. But the names of children who applied at the certificate office without the requisite documents or with documents improperly made out were not recorded by the issuing officer. Some of these children may have been newcomers to the city or for other reasons may not hay been enrolled in school and, if so, they could easily go to work illegal! when they found difficulties in the way of securing certificates. As for the return to school of children who were temporarily unem ployed, during the early part of the period covered by this inquiry https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF TH E CHILD-LABOR LA W . 293 little effort was made in this direction. The new eight-hour law for Children under 16 went into effect in September, 1913, at the same time as the new certificate law, and its immediate result was the discharge of a considerable number of children— all of whom had gone to work before September 1, 1913, and who were therefore not included in this study. The number of children discharged and the fact that it was considered impossible to send back to school any of those who had been employed for some time, resulted in practically no effort being made to return to school any unemployed children. Gradually the children originally thrown out of work by the eight-hour law secured new positions or became 16 and were therefore no longer subject to the compulsory-education law. At the same time the new legal provision requiring employers to return to the certificate office the certificates of children who left work or were discharged led to the accumulation of evidence never before available as to what children were unemployed. By the end of the period covered by this study, as has been stated, more or less suc cessful efforts were being made to have these children attend con tinuation school every day until they had secured new positions. Because of the large number of employers in Boston it was found ifficult to secure the prompt return of all certificates, and unless the certificates are returned it is not possible even to know the names of the unemployed children. To aid in insuring prompt return, the certificate office refused to issue a new certificate to a child until his previous one had been returned. This made the child, as well as the officials, interested in forcing the employer to obey the law; but it was of only indirect assistance in case the child did not soon secure a new position, and these were exactly the cases where it was most important that the school authorities be notified of the unemploy ment. The Boston attendance officers, in the course of their work, not infrequently inspected industrial establishments. The main burden of such inspections, however, rested upon the inspectors of the State board of labor and industries. These inspectors were specifically directed, while school attendance officers were only permitted, to visit “ factories, workshops, manufacturing, mechanical, and mercan tile establishments” to ascertain whether children were employed contrary to law.2 During most of the period covered by this study there were for the entire State only 24 of these inspectors (of whom 12 were industrial health inspectors); 19 of them were men and 5 [were women. With this force it was not believed possible to inspect all establishments in the State more often than once a year. Some establishments in which violations had been found were visited again within a comparatively short period. * Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 62, as amended by acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 20. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 294 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. The methods of inspection for child labor varied with the inspector and with the size of the establishment. Sometimes an inspectoi would take from the office all the certificates on file and endeavor to identify each child for whom he found a certificate. In the larger establishments he was more likely to pick out children while going through the rooms and ask them to sign their names on a slip of paper, looking afterwards in the office files for their certificates. Orders were made out in triplicate, a white copy to be left with the employer, a pink copy to be sent to the State board, and a blue copy to be kept by the inspector. A date was usually set before which the order must be obeyed, and at or near the expiration of the time the inspector was instructed by the attorney for the board to visit the establishment again and ascertain whether the order had been complied with or prosecution should be undertaken. Inspectors did not usually recommend prosecution unless the employer was a repeated offender or the violation was long continued and evidently willful. The inspectors in Boston as a rule made no reports to the school authorities as to children whom they ordered discharged. An inspec tor sometimes inquired at the certificate office as to whether a par ticular child whom he had ordered to obtain a certificate had done so. More often he went back to the establishment to find out, and if he found the child had been discharged, made no further inquiry as to his whereabouts. In such a case, the child was likely to secure illegal employment in another position and inspections were so infre quent that he might easily be over 16 years of age before being again discovered. The law creating the State board of labor and industries went into effect on June 1, 1913; and the new certificate law requiring that a special certificate be issued to each employer, on September 1, 1913. The former law, under which a child secured his certificate and took it from employer to employer, was enforced under a quite different system by the district police. The three years covered by this study included the period of organization of the work of the board of labor and industries. At the sapie time, as already seen,’ it included a period during which employers, parents, and children were becoming accustomed to the much more strict regulations of the new certificate law, to the limitation of the hours of children to eight a day, and in Boston to the establishment of the compulsory continuation school. As a result of the number and complexity of the new laws which went into effect in the fall of 1913, the inspectors of the State board were! engaged from September of that year to the spring of 1914 prima rily in visits to employers to instruct them in the provisions of the new law and to endeavor to secure their cooperation in its enforce ment. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LA W . 295 The cases of violation of child-labor laws discovered in the course 6f this study must be considered, therefore, as belonging to a period when a new enforcing authority was endeavoring to put into effect a number of new provisions of law, especially the provision requiring a certificate for each different employer and the provision limiting the hours of children to eight a day. At least at the beginning of this period, employers were not fully acquainted with the provisions of the law and the administrative machinery was not in full opera tion. It should be added, however, that for many years certificates of some sort had been required for the employment of children, and their hours in many occupations had been limited to 10 a day and 54 or 58 a week. Moreover, many if not most of the violations in positions held before the children had left school occurred under the old and less strict law and a long-established system of enforcement. At the same time it should be remembered that the information secured as to violations of law is based entirely upon the statements of the children. As these statements related mainly to past events in their lives they could not, of course, be verified, hut there seems no reason to doubt that in most cases the child’s statement was substantially correct. Only positive cases of violation were so clas sified; in case of the slightest apparent doubt the work was classified as legal. Except in the case of school positions, violations of the child-labor law only, and not violations of the school-attendance law, are considered. For instance, many of the intervals between leaving school and going to work, as well as many of the periods of unem ployment discussed earlier in this report, were probably in violation of the school-attendance law. On the other hand, during some of these periods the children doubtless held special home permits which enabled them legally to remain out of school.3 EVIDENCE OF AGE. Before proceeding to a discussion of violations, however, it is of interest to note in connection with the enforcement of the certificate law the kind of evidence of age secured from applicants for employ ment certificates. According to law3a no other evidence of age should be accepted if either a birth or a baptismal certificate is obtainable. These two documents are equally acceptable. If neither is available the next preferred evidence is a passport, immigration record or transcript, or other official or religious record; and if no one of these documents is available a record of age as given on the register of the school which the child first attended in Massachusetts is accepted, ¿provided the record was kept for at least two years while the child was in attendance. As a last resort, if no other evidence of age can * See appendix, pp. 364 to 365, for results of a study of special home permits in Boston. «A s in effect at the time of the study. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 296 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. be produced, a certificate of age, signed by a school physician or by. a physician appointed by the school committee, may be accepted.4 In the latter case, the parent must also sign the card, certifying that he or she is unable to produce for the child a birth certificate or any other document named as acceptable evidence of age. Official records of birth ought usually to be available for children born in Massachusetts, for birth registration has long been efficiently carried on in that State. Nevertheless, Table 143 shows that, of all the children taking out employment certificates in the four cities— Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Chelsea— who were born in one of those cities, only 87.9 per cent produced official birth records as evidence of age. Most of the others, however, 10.1 per cent, pro duced baptismal certificates, which were equally acceptable. Only three-tenths of 1 per cent of these children were obliged to resort to a physician’s examination for evidence of age. T a b l e 143.— P r o o f o f age, by place o f birth; children issued certificates in fo u r cities. Children born in— Proof of age. Boston, Elsewhere All places. •Cambridge, in United Somerville, States. or Chelsea. Per Num cent dis Num ber. tribu ber. tion. Total.......... ............................ .......... Birth record..... .................................. ....... . Baptismal record.......................................... Schoolregister............................................ Passport or other official or religious record. Physician’s examination.............................. Not reported............................................ Per cent Num dis tribu ber. tion.1 Foreign countries. Per cent Num dis ber. tribu tion. Per cent dis tribu tion. 5,692 100.0 4,023 100.0 623 100.0 1,044 100.0 4,499 79.0 3,536 576 10.1 407 307 5.4 37 198 3.5 2 1.2 67 13 45 .8 28 481 77.2 73 11.7 41 6.6 8 1.3 13 2.1 1.1 7 87.9 10.1 .9 .3 .7 N ot' re port ed. 480 46.0 96 9.2 229 21.9 188 18.0 41 3. 9 10 1.0 !Not shown where less than one-tenth of 1 per cent. For native children born elsewhere than in Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, or Chelsea, many of whom doubtless were born in some other place in Massachusetts, official birth records were produced in a little over three-fourths, 77.2 per cent, of all cases. A somewhat larger proportion of these children, 11.7 per cent, as compared with 10.1 per cent of those born in one of the four cities, used baptismal records, and a much larger proportion, 6.6 per cent, as compared with 0.9 per cent, used school registers as evidence of age. About 1 in 50, 2.1 per cent, of these children could secure no documentary evi-j! dence and had to have their ages determined by physical examination. 4Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 58, as amended by acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 16, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW . 297 £ Before the beginning of the World War it was the custom to require foreign-born children who did not bring baptismal records or pass ports to send abroad for copies of their birth certificates. Even after the beginning of the war these children were for a time required to send to those countries which were most accessible. Thus many birth certificates were secured for Italian children who constituted the predominating foreign element in Boston. On the other hand, m Chelsea, where the predominating foreign element was RussianJewish, few birth certificates could be secured for foreign-born chil dren after the first year covered by this study. During the latter part of the period, moreover, especially after the entrance of Italy into the war, the difficulties of communication became so great that efforts to send to any foreign country for evidence of age were entirely suspended. Nevertheless, nearly one-half, 46 per cent, of the foreign-born children who took out certificates in the four cities produced official records of birth, and less than one-tenth, 9.2 per cent, produced records of baptism. School registers were used as evidence of age by a larger proportion of these children, 21.9 per cent, than were “ pass ports or other official or religious records, ” 18 per cent. It is said that the reason so few passports are offered is that in many cases, on coming to this country, parents have understated the ages of their children in order to enable them to travel at half rates. Of the foreign-born children only 3.9 per cent were obliged to resort to the physician’s certificate. This small proportion was doubtless due in part to the fact that the requirement of ability to read and write English forced the children from non-English-speaking countries, even if nearly or quite of working age, to go to school in this country for a long enough period so that the school register could be used as evidence of age. VIOLATIONS IN SCHOOL POSITIONS. A decided majority, 60.8 per cent, of the children who worked before leaving school did so, according to Table 144, in violation of some provision of the child-labor law. This does not mean that all the work of these children before leaving school was illegal or that violations occurred in all the positions held by them, but it does mean that nearly two-thirds of all the children who worked before leaving school were employed in some way illegally in one or more of their school positions. The proportion of boys who had worked NpgaHy before leaving school was much higher than that of girls, |4.3 per cent as compared with 38.6 per cent. This was probably in part due to the fact that the girls, as a rule, were older when they began work. A large proportion, perhaps the majority, of these 4 9 4 7 0 ° — 2 2 ------- 2 0 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 298 THE W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BO STO N . violations occurred under the child-labor law in force before Sep tember 1, 1913, but all of these and many others would have been , classed as violations if the latter law had been in effect at the time of their occurrence.5 T a b l e 144.— Illeg a l em p loym en t in an y school p o sitio n , by sex ; interview ed children who w orked before leaving school. Children who worked before leaving school— Illegally in one or more posi tions. Sex. Legally in all positions. Total. Num ber. Per cent. Num ber. Per cent. 324 197 60.8 127 39.2 280 44 180 17 64.3 38.6 100 27 35.7 61.4 Of the positions held before leaving school 83 per cent 'irere for “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods,” but of those in which violations of any kind occurred, as appears in Table 145, not far from nine-tenths, 88.9 per cent, and of those in which two violations occurred, decidedly over nine-tenths, 93 per cent, belonged in this group. For the boys alone these proportions were even higher, 90.8 per cent and 94.2 per cent, respectively. a Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping room work and selling, other than newsboys” each showed an excess in the proportion of positions in which violations occurred over the proportion of all positions held before leaving school. B y far the greatest excess was found in positions for messenger, errand, and delivery work. Less than one-half, 47.6 per cent, of all the school positions, but nearly three-fourths, 74.5 per cent, of those in which any violations occurred, and over four-fifths, 81.7 per cent, of those in which two violations occurred, were for occupations of this kind. This was due to the large amount of employment before leaving school as delivery boys for small stores and as peddlers’ helpers, occupations frequently involving Saturday night work. Factory and mechanical occupations also showed a slight excess in the proportion of positions in which violations occurred over their proportion of all school positions, 7.7 percent, as compared with 5.2 per cent. Personal and domestic occupations, evidently because of s Before Sept. 1,1913, the minimum age of 14 applied only to factories, workshops, or mercantile estab lishments and there was no minimum age in street trades. Night work was prohibited for women and minorsin manufacturing establishments from 10 p. m. to 6 a. m ., but in other occupations only for children under 14 from 7 p. m. to 6 a. m. In manufacturing establishments the hours of minors under 18 were limited to 10 a day, and 54 (or 58 in seasonal industries) a week, and in mercantile establishments they were limited to 58 per week. Acts of 1909, ch. 514, secs. 17 (as amended by Acts of 1912, ch. 191), 47,48 (as amended b y Acts of 1912, ch. 477), 49, 51,56, 62-65. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW . 299 |i comparative lack of legal regulations, accounted for only 2.6 per ^cfent of the positions in which violations of any kind occurred, as compared with 9.1 per cent of all positions held before leaving school Both newsboys and bootblacks, the latter included under “ personal service (other than servants in the home),” coiWd work legally out side of school hours as soon as they were 12 years of age on street trades licenses and were not obliged to secure employment certifi cates. No information was secured in regard to whether or not they had secured such licenses. Boys engaged in these occupations could work later at night and earlier in the morning than could children engaged in other occupations.6 Violations of the child-labor law, therefore, were less likely to occur among newsboys and bootblacks than among other children. As domestic service and agricultural pursuits were regulated only by the compulsory school-attendance law comparatively few violations were likely to occur in these occupations. The most common type of violation was employment under legal age, and the next most common type was illegal employment at night. According to Table 146, out of a total of 385 violations of law occur ring in positions held before leaving school, 155 involved employment t too early an age and 123 involved employment either too early in he morning or too late at night. These two kinds of violation together accounted for almost three-fourths, 72.2 per cent, of all the violations which occurred in positions held before leaving school. In 46 cases the children were illegally not certificated; in 42 the daily hours and in 13 the weekly hours were too long; in 2 the children worked seven days a week; in 3 they were employed during school hours; and in 1 the occupation was illegal. Both under age and night-work violations were especially common in messenger, errand, and delivery work. Of the under age viola tions 126 out of 155, and of the night-work violations 95 out of 123 occurred in this occupation. Selling, which accounted for nearly one-tenth, 9.6 per cent, of the total violations in all positions, had less than its proportionate share, 6.5 per cent, of under age viola tions, but more than its proportionate share, 10.6 per cent, of nightwork violations. Personal and domestic occupations also had more than their proportionate share, 4.9 per cent, as compared with 2.6 per cent of all violations, of cases in which children worked too early in the morning or too late at night. Ten children had been employed under age, but only 3 had been employed at night in factory and ||gechanical occupations before they left school. Moreover, 6 chil dren had been illegally employed without certificates and 4 had been employed for too long daily and 2 for too long weekly hours in factory and mechanical occupations. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 300 THE T able W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF B O S T O N . 145.— N um ber o f vio la tio n s, by occupation and sex o f child; school p osition s held i by interview ed children. mi Total school positions held. Total positions m which violations occurred. School positions showing—• One viola tion. Two viola tions. Occupation and sex of child. N um ber. Both sexes............................................................ Personal and domestic occupations.............................. Personal service (other than servantsin the home). House and home work............................................ Factory and mechanical occupations........................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.......................................... ............................. Office work......... .................................................... Cash and messenger work—department store....... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room , work........................... .......... ......................... Selling...................................................................... Newsboys.......................................................... Selling, other than newsboys........................... Messenger work, errand and delivery.................... All other occupations............................................... . Not reported...................................................... -......... B o y s ...,............................................................... Personal and domestic occupations............................ . Personal service (other than servants in the home). House and home work.......................................... Factory and mechanical occupations.......................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods...................... .......................................... Office work....................................................... Cash and messenger work—department store. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work.......................................................... Selling.. ...................................................... Newsboys............................................... Selling, other than newsboys............... Messenger work, errand and delivery........ All other occupations........................................ Not reported......................... ............................. Girls......................... ................................ Personal and domestic occupations................... Personal service (other than servants in the home). House and home work................................ Factory and mechanical occupations......................... . Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................................................. Office work...................................................... . Cash and messenger work—department store. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work......................... ................................. Selling........................................................... Newsboys............................................... Selling, other than newsboys............... Messenger work, errand and delivery......... All other occupations......................................... Not reported....................................................... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Per cent N um dis ber. tribu tion. 483 100.0 Per Per Per cent cent cent Num Num dis dis dis ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 235 100.0 127 100.0 71 100.0 2 .4 .8 1.6 10.2 2 2 2.8 2.8 3 4.2 85.8 .8 1.6 66 93.0 1 1.4 2.4 11.0 .8 10.2 70.1 1.6 2 5 2.8 7.0 5 58 7.0 81.7 69 loo. a . 44 26 18 25 9.1 5 .4 3 .7 5.2 6 4 2 18 2.6 1.7 .9 7.7 401 5 13 83.0 .0 2.7 209 1 3 88.9 .4 1.3 109 9 144 112 32 230 10 3 1.9 29.8 23. 2 6 .6 47.6 2.1 .6 7 23 1 22 175 2 3 .0 9 .8 .4 9 .4 74.5 .9 3 14 1 430 100.0 217 100.0 3 T 2 13 1 2 1 13 89 2 112 100.0 13 7 .2 5 .8 1. 4 3 .0 13 2.3 1.8 .5 6 .0 9 1.8 .9 .9 8.0 375 2 4 87.2 .5 .9 197 90.8 99 88.4 1 .5 1 .9 1.2 31.6 26. 0 5 .6 53.0 2.1 .5 5 2.3 7 .8 .5 7.4 80.2 .9 1 .9 8.0 .9 7.1 78.6 1.8 31 25 6 5 136 112 24 228 9 2 53 100.0 13 5 4 1 17 1 16 174 2 18 100.0 1 2 1 1 9 1 8 88 2 15 100.0 12 12 1 1 5 4 26 3 9 49.1 5. 7 17.0 12 1 2 10 4 8 7.5 2 15.1 6 2 5 8 Î 5 .1 6 5 2 i i 3. 8 1.9 1.9 1 1 1 1 2.9 2.9 2 2.9 65 94.2 2 5 2.9 7.2 5 58 7.2 84.1 2 100.0 1 24. 5 1. 9 22. 6 22.6 1 2 2 1 1 1 E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E 301 C H IL D -L A B OR L A W . T a b l e 145.— N um ber o f violation s, by occupation and sex o f child; school position s held by interviewed children— Concluded. School positions showing— Three violations. Four viola tions. Total violations in all school positions. Occupation and sex of child. N um ber. B oth sexes.......................................................................... 32 Personal and domestic occupations...................................... Personal service (other than servants in the home). House and home w ork....................................................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................................. Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................................................................................ Office w ork........................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling,‘ and shipping-room work............................................................................ Selling.......................................................................... Newsboys........................................................................ Selling, other than newsboys.................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery........................ A ll other occupations................................... ....................... 1 1 B oys.............................................................................. Personal and domestic occupations............................. Personal service (other than servants in the home). House and home w ork................................................ Factory and mechanical occupations.................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods................................................................ .......... Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work.......................................................................... . Selling............................................................................ N ew sboys................................................................... Selling, other than new sboys..................... Messenger work, errand and delivery......... A ll other occupations................................... " ......... Girls.................................................................... Personal and domestic occupations................................ House and home work............................................. Factory and mechanical occupations........................ Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods......................................................................... Office work......................................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work.............................................................................. Selling.................................................................................. Selling, other than newsboys.................................. Messenger work, errand and delivery.......................... 1 Not shown when base is less than 50. / https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent distri ber. distri ber. distri bution.1 bution.1 bution.1 100.0 5 100.0 2 29 5 2 3 1 3 24 1 4 32 100.0 4 100.0 1 1 2 29 » 4 2 3 3 24 4 100.0 1 100.0 385 100.0 10 8 2 25 2.6 2.1 .5 6.5 348 1 4 90.4 .3 1.0 13 37 1 36 293 2 3.4 9.6 .3 9.4 76.1 .5 362 100.0 9 - 8 1 19 2.5 2.2 .3 5.2 332 1 91.7 .3 11 28 1 27 292 2 3 .0 7.7 .3 '7 .5 80.7 .6 23 100.0 1 1 6 1 1 1 16 1 3 2 9 9 1 302 Th e w o r k in g Ch i l d r e n of boston . 146.— K in d o f violation, by occupation and sex o f child; violations occurring ijk. school positions held by interviewed children who worlced before leaving school, f * T able Hour violations. Total violations Under age. in all school positions. Occupation and sex. Ille gally uncertifiPer Per cated cent cent (num N um N um dis dis ber) ' ber. ber tribu tribu tion.1 tion.1 Both sexes............ .. Personal and domestic oc cupations ............................. Personal service (other than servants in the home)............................ House and home work. Factory and mechanical occupations......................... Clerical occupations, wrap ping, selling, and deliv ery of goods........................ Office w ork..................... Cash and messenger work, department store.............................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, ana shipping-room work........ Selling............................... Newsboys................ Selling, other than newsboys............. Messenger work, er rand and delivery.. . A ll other ocupations........... B oys.............................. Personal and domestic oc cupations............................. Personal service ( other than servants in the h om e)........................... House and home work. Factory and mechanical occupations......................... Clerical occupations, wrap ping, selling, and deliv ery of goods......................... Cash and messenger work, department store............................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work........ Selling............................... Newsboys................ Selling, other than newsboys............. Messenger work, er rand and delivery.. . A ll other occupations......... 385 100.0 155 Work dur ing 7-day school hours Per week cent (num (num N um dis ber).1 ber).1 ber. tribu tion.1 Night work. pation (num ber) ‘ D aily Week hours (num hours ber).1 (num ber).1 ly 100.0 42 46 4.1 10.6 12 36 77.2 .8 100.0 362 7.5 80.7 .6 1 Rate not shown where base is less than 50, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Ule- 43 1 100.0 1 ^E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . 303 146.- —K in d o f violation, by occupation and sex o f child; violations occurring m school positions held by interviewed children who worked before leaving school— Con cluded. T able Hour violations. Total violations in all school positions. Ille W ork gally Ille Night work. dur gal uning occucerpa- D aily W eek 7-day school tifihours Per Per cated tion hours Per week ly cent cent (num (num (num hours cent (num (num N um N um dis dis ber).1 ber).1 ber).1 (num N um dis ber).1 ber).1 ber. ber. ber. tribu tribu ber).1 tribu tion.1 tion.1 tion.1 Occupation and sex. Girls............................ '. Personal and domestic oc cupations............................. House and home work. Factory and mechanical occupations........................ Clerical occupations, wrap ping, selling, and deliv ery of goods........................ Office w ork..................... Cash and messenger work, department store.............................. Packing, wrapping, labeling, and ship ping-room work........ Selling.............................. Selling, other than newsboys............. Messenger work, er rand and delivery.. . A ll other occupations.......... 23 100.0 10 100.0 3 3 2 1 1 3 100.0 i i 6 3 i 1 i 16 1 7 2 1 2 i 1 1 3 2 2 i 2 9 2 4 1 i 2 i 9 4 1 i 2 i 1 1. 1 1 Rate not shown where base is less than 50. VIOLATIONS IN REGULAR POSITIONS. In regular positions— that is, positions held after leaving school— practically one-half, 49.8 per cent, of the children interviewed, ac cording to Table 147, were employed in one or more positions in violation of some provision of the child-labor law. The proportion of boys so employed was decidedly higher than that of the girls, 57.7 per cent as compared with 39 per cent. The foreign-born children appear to have been somewhat more likely to be employed illegally than the native children of foreignborn fathers and decidedly more so than the native children of native fathers. Of the first group 51.2 per cent, of the second 50.4 per cent, and of the third 45.3 per cent, were employed at some time in viola tion of the law. Nearly two-thirds, 65.8 per cent, of the foreign-born boys, but not much more than one-third, 38.9 per cent, of the foreignborn girls worked illegally. Among the native children of foreign"born fathers nearly three-fifths, 59.5 per cent, of the boys and less than two-fifths, 37.1 per cent, of the girls worked illegally. The dif ference between the boys and girls was less, 47.2 per cent as com pared with 41.9 per cent, among the native children whose fathers also were native. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 304 th e w o r k in g c h il d r e n of B O STO N . % T a b l e 147.— Illegal em ploym ent in any regular position , by nativity o f father, and nativity ■* and sex o f child; children interview ed. Children who worked— N ativity of father and nativity and sex of child. Children native...................................................................................... Children foreign b o m .......................................................................... B o y s...................................................................................................... Childrennatiye................................................................ .................... A ll chil dren. Illegally in one or more regular positions. Legally in all regular positions. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 823 410 49.8 413 50.2 201 593 427 166 29 91 300 215 85 19 45.3 50.6 50.4 5L 2 110 293 212 8t 10 54.7 49.4 49.6 48.8 477 275 57.7 202 42.3 127 328 252 76 22 60 200 150 50 15 47.2 61.0 59.5 65.8 67 128 102 26 7 52.8 39.0 40.5 34.2 346 135 39.0 211 61.0 74 265 175 90 7 31 100 65 35 4 41.9 37.7 37.1 38.9 43 165 no 55 a 58.1 62.3 - 62.9 61.1 i N ot shown where base is less than 50. The retarded children, as appears in Table 148, were more likely to be employed illegally than the children from normal grades or from grades higher than normal. The latter, the advanced children, were more often employed illegally than the normal children. The pro portions of children who worked illegally were 55.4 per cent for the retarded, 49.3 per eent for the advanced, and 46.2 per cent for the normal groups. For the boys alone these proportions were 65.1 per cent, 61 per cent, and 51.7 per cent, respectively. Among the girls a different order was found for, although a larger proportion, 43.2 per cent, of the retarded than of any other group of girls was employed illegally, the smallest proportion, 31.5 per cent, of girls who were illegally employed was found among those who had completed a higher grade than normal .for their ages. The children who worked before leaving school were more fre quently employed illegally in one or more of their regular positions than were those who did not work before leaving school. Table 149 shows that of all the children who worked before leaving school 57.7 per cent, and of those who did not work only 44.7 per cent werA employed illegally in some regular position. This difference occurred entirely among the boys, for only 38.6 per cent of the girls who had worked, as compared with 39.1 per cent of those who had not worked, before leaving school were illegally employed after they had defi https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E 305 C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . nitely left school for industrial life. About three-fifths, 60.7 per ^cent, of the boys who worked, as compared with 53.3 per cent of those who did not work, before leaving school were illegally employed in some regular position. T a b l e 148. — Illegal em ploym ent in any regular position , by retardation and sex; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. Violation of law in regular positions, and sex. A higher grade than normal. A normal grade. Per N um cent N um dis ber. ber. tribu tion. Both sexes.......................................... 136 100.0 One or two grades low er than normal. Total. Per cent N um dis ber. tribu tion. Per cent dis tribu tion. Three or more grades lower ' than Per nor cent N um m al, dis ber. num tribu ber.1 tion. N ot re ported. 409 100.0 267 100.0 233 100.0 34 189 220 148 119 125 108 53.6 46.4 23 135 100.0 14 8 63.7 36.3 11 3 5 3 98 100.0 20 3 39 59 12 8 1 2 u Working illegally in one or more posiN o violation............................................... Boys...................................................... W orking illegally in one or more positions.............................................................. N o violation................................................... Girls...................................................... Working illegally in one or more positions.............................................................. No violation................................................... 67 69 49.3 50.7 46.2 53.8 82 100.0 238 100.0 50 32 123 115 61.0 39.0 51.7 48.3 54 100.0 171 100.0 17 37 66 105 31.5 68.5 38.6 61.4 55.4 44.6 149 100.0 97 52 65.1 34.9 86 49 118 100.0 51 67 43.2 56.8 6 5 11 39.8 60.2 1 Rate not shown where hasé is less than 50. T a b l e 149. — Illegal em ploym ent in any regular p osition , by em ploym ent before leaving school, and sex; children interview ed. Children who worked— Em ploym ent before leaving school, and sex. Both sexes................................................... All chil dren. Illegally in one or more regular positions. Legally in all regular posi tions. N um ber. Per cent. N um ber. Per cent. 823 410 49.8 413. 50.2 Worked before leaving school...................... D id not work before leaving school....................... 324 499 187 223 57.7 44.7 137 276 42.3 55.3 477 275 57.7 202 42.3 Worked before leaving school............................ D id not work before leaving school................. 280 197 170 105 60.7 53.3 110 92 39.3 46.7 Girls....................................................................... 346 135 39.0 211 61.0 Worked before leaving school.................................. .. D id not work before leaving school............................. -ui - 44 302 17 118 38.6 39.1 27 184 61.4 60.9 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 306 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . CERTIFICATION AND NATIVITY AND FATHER’S NATIONALITY. Table 150 shows that more than one-sixteenth, 6.7 per cent, of the children interviewed failed to secure certificates for their first regular positions. In some positions, however, certificates were not required under the law,7 while others were held outside Boston and its sub urbs— a few of them in foreign countries— and it was not known whether or not they were certificated. Only one-twentieth, 5 per cent, therefore, of these children were known to have been employed without certificates in violation of the law. Of the 41 children thus employed six could not have obtained certificates because they were under 14 years of age when they took their first regular positions. About one-tenth of the children, 9.4 per cent, were certificated late, that is, more than 10 days after they had taken their first regular positions.8 Of the 77 children thus certificated late 9 were under 14 when they began work. ~ The girls more generally held certificates, and also more generally secured them on time— that is, within 10 days after going to work in their first regular positions— than did the boys. Of the girls 95.1 per cent were certificated and 89.3 per cent were certificated on time, while of the boys only 92 per cent were certificated and only 80.1 per cent were certificated on time. The proportion of girl, illegally not certificated was 4 per cent, while that of boys was 5. / per cent. Late certification in the first regular position was most common among native children of native fathers and least common among foreign-bom children. Over one-ninth, 11.4 per cent, of the native children of native fathers, but only about one-twelfth, 8.4 per cent, of the native children of foreign-bom fathers and an even smaller proportion, 7.8 per cent, of the foreign-bom children took out their certificates for their first regular positions more than 10 days after they had begun work. Late certification was particularly common among the native boys whose fathers also were native. Of these boys 15 per cent, as compared with only 5.4 per cent of the girls of the same nativity group, were certificated late. A much larger pro portion, too, of the boys than of the girls who were themselves native but whose fathers were foreign born, 11.1 per cent as com pared with 4.6 per cent, took out their certificates more than one week late. Among the foreign-born girls the proportion of late certifications was higher, 7.8 per cent, than in any other group of girls and almost exactly the same as among the foreign-bom b o y ^ 7 Certificates were not required b y law (1) for employment during vacation in a few occupations, smjh as “ water boy for contracting com pany,” (2) for employment outside school hours in selling newspapers or other occupations covered b y the street trades law, and (3) for employment in mercantile establishments on Saturdays. Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 57, as amended b y Acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. .15. s Children certificated within 10 days after going to work were not considered to have been certificated late. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E 307 C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . 7.9 per cent. Evidently the relatively greater frequency of late certifications among the native children of native fathers was due entirely to the boys. T able 150.— Certification in first regular position, by nativity o f father and nativity and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children. Fathers fo reign bom . Certification in first regular position and sex. Both fathers and children native. Nativ Children ity of foreign bom . fathers not re ported; chil Per Per Per Per dren cent cent cent cent N um N um N um N um native. dis dis dis dis ber. ber. ber. ber. tribu tribu tribu tribu tion. tion. tion. tion. Total. Children native. Both sexes................................................. 823 100.0 201 100.0 427 100.0 166 100.0 29 Certificated............................................................ 768 93.3 189 94.0 397 93.0 155 93.4 27 On tim e.......................................................... L a te1....... ....................................................... 691 2 77 84.0 9 .4 166 23 82.6 11.4 361 36 84.5 8.4 142 13 85. 5 7 .8 22 •5 N ot certificated.. . : ............................................ 55 6.7 12 6.0 30 7.0 11 6 .6 2 Ille g a lly --.............. * ................................... 14 8 41 1.7 5.0 2 10 1.0 5.0 7 23 1.6 5.4 5 6 3 .0 3 .6 2 B o y s.......................................................... 477 100.0 127 100.0 252 100.0 76 100.0 22 Certificated............................................................ 439 92.0 118 92.9 231 91.7 68 89 5 22 On tim e.......................................................... L a t e ................................................................ 382 57 80.1 11.9 99 19 78.0 15.0 203 28 80.6 11.1 62 6 81.6 7 .9 18 4 38 8.0 9 7.1 21 8.3 8 10.5 11 27 2.3 5.7 2 7 1.6 5.5 5 16 2.0 6.3 4 4 5.3 5.3 Girls..................... ....................................... 346 100.0 74 100.0 175 •100.0 90 100.0 7 Certificated.............................................. ......... .. - 329 95.1 71 95.9 166 94.9 87 96.7 5 On tim e.......................................................... Late................................................................- 309 20 89.3 5 .8 67 4 90.5 5 .4 158 8 90.3 4.6 80 7 88.9 7.8 4 1 17 4 .9 3 4.1 9 5.1 3 3.3 2 3 14 .9 4.0 4.1 2 7 1.1 4.0 1 2 1.1 2 .2 2 N ot certificated.............................................. Illegally.......................................................... 3 1 B y “ late ” is meant more than 10 days after going to work:. 2 Including nine children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. 8 Including six children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. Failure to take out a certificate for a first regular position for which under the law it was required was most common among the native children of foreign-born fathers, but least common among Ahe foreign-born children. Of the native children of foreign-born fathers 5.4 per cent, of those of native fathers 5 per cent, and of the foreign-born children only 3.6 per cent failed’to take out certificates for such positions. Although only one-twentieth, 5 per cent, of the children were illegally uncertificated in their first regular positions,1more than one https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 308 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. eighth, 13.6 per cent, of them, as appears in Table 151, worked in^ some regular position in which certificates were required by law/-* without having secured such certificates. 'These children appear to have been less likely to secure certificates for later than for first positions. Of the 1,943 positions held 1,120, or 57.6 per cent, were second or later positions, while of the 163 which were illegally not certificated 122, or 74.8 per cent, were second or later positions.9 This may have been due, in part at least, to lack of familiarity, during the early part of the period covered by this study, with the provisions of the new law which required a certificate for each new employer. Nearly one-tenth, 9.7 per cent, of all the children and over onetenth, 10.5 per cent, of the boys alone held only one illegally uncer tificated position; but 3.9 per cent of all the children and 4.4 per cent of the boys alone held two or three such positions. Five boys and two girls each held three positions for which they failed to secure the certificates required by law. Table • 151. —Number o f illeg a lly uncertificated p o sition s held, by n a tivity o f father and n a tiv ity and sex o f child; children interview ed. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW . 309 The native children of native fathers appear to have been less ikely than the native children of foreign-born fathers and the latter than the foreign-bom children to hold illegally uncertificated positions. Of the first group 12.4 per cent, of the second 13.1 per cent, and of the third 15.1 per cent held one or more such positions. As it has already been seen that failure to take out a certificate for a first regular position for which, under the law, it was required, was least common among the foreign-born children, it is evident that failure to take out certificates for later positions was much more prevalent in this group than in any other. This fact seems to confirm the theory that failure to secure new certificates when children changed positions was often due to lack of familiarity with the new law, for both the foreign-born children and their employers would be least likely to secure prompt information as to the exact provisions of recent legislation. In each nativity group a smaller proportion of the girls than of the boys held one or more illegally uncertificated positions. But the difference was least, 12 per cent as compared with 13.9 per cent, among the native children of foreign-born fathers, and most, 11.1 per cent as compared with 19.7 per cent, among the foreign-born .children. Of the foreign-born girls, indeed, a smaller proportion, 11.1 per cent, than of the native girls whose fathers were foreign born, 12 per cent, held one or more positions for which they illegally failed to take out certificates. Nevertheless, failure to take out certificates for more than one position in which they were required by law was more common among the native girls whose fathers were also native than in any other group of girls and also than among the boys whose fathers were native. Table 152 shows that of all the children of foreign-born fathers, including both native and foreign-born children, a smaller proportion, 86.3 per cent, than of the children of native fathers, 87.6 per cent, never held any illegally uncertificated positions. In other words, a larger proportion of the children of foreign-born than of native fathers held one or more illegally uncertificated positions. The largest proportion, 18.6 per cent, of children who held such positions was found in the Russian-Jewish, and the smallest, 11.4 per cent, in the Irish group. One Russian-Jewish child out of every ten, 10 per cent, held two or more and only 8.6 per cent held only one such position. Of the Italian children, on the other hand, only 1 in 50, 2 per cent, held two or more, but about 1 in 10,10.7 per cent, held one /u ch position. The Irish children, like the Italian though to a less 'degree, were more inclined to hold only one than to hold more than one illegally uncertificated position. In general, the children of foreign-born fathers of non-English speaking nationalities were more likely than those of foreign-born fathers of English-speaking nationalities to fail to secure certificates https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 310 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTON . for positions for which, under the law, they were required. This difference occurred entirely among the girls. Of the girls whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities 13.2 per cent, and of those whose fathers were foreign born of Englishspeaking nationalities only 8.8 per cent held one or more illegally uncertificated positions. On the other hand, of the boys whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities 14.9 per cent, and of those whose fathers were foreign born of Englishspeaking nationalities a slightly larger proportion, 15.1 per cent, held one or more illegally uncertificated positions. Nearly as large a proportion of the Italian girls as of the Italian boys, 12.5 per cent, as compared with 12.9 per cent, but a very small proportion, 7.5 per cent, of the Irish girls as compared with the Irish boys, 13.9 per cent, failed to secure certificates for one or more positions for which the law required such certificates. T a b l e 152.— Number o f illegally uncertificated positions held, by nationality o f father ' and sex o f child; children interviewed. Children who Jleid positions ille gaily uncertificated. N ationality of father and sex of child. All chil dren. N one. Num ber. One. Per cent.1 N um ber. Tw o or more. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 Both sexes......................................................... 823 711 86.4 80 9.7 32 3.9 Fathers native.............................................................. Fathers foreign born.................................................. Of English-speaking nationalities................ Irish.................................................................. Other................................................................ O f non-English-speaking nationalities........ Italian.............................................................. Russian Jewish............................................. Other................................................................ 201 2593 243 167 76 349 197 70 82 29 176 512 212 148 64 300 172 57 71 23 87.6 86.3 87.2 88.6 84.2 86.0 87.3. 81.4 86.6 17 60 23 14 9 37 21 6 10 3 8.5 10.1 9.5 8.4 11.8 10.6 10.7 8.6 12.2 8 2 21 8 5 3 12 4 7 1 3 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.0 3.9 3.4 2.0 1C.0 1.2 B oys...................................................................... 477 406 85.1 50 10.5 21 4.4 Fathers native............................................................. Fathers foreign born.................................................. Of English-speaking nationalities................ Irish.................................................................. Other................................................................ O f non-English-speaking nationalities___ Italian.......................; ..................................... 110 278 129 87 42 149 74 31 44 18 86.6 84.8 84.9 86.1 82.4 85.1 87.1 12 35 17 11 6 18 8 4 6 3 9.4 10.7 11.2 10.9 11.8 10.3 9.4 5 2 15 6 3 3 8 3 5 3.9 4.6 3.9 3.0 5.9 4.6 3.5 N ativity of fathers not reported............................ 127 2328 152 101 51 175 85 40 50 22 Girls............................ •......................................... 346 305 88.2 30 8.7 11 3.2 Fathers native.............................................................. Fathers foreign born.................................................. Of English-speaking nationalities.................. Irish.................................................................. 74 265 91 66 25 174 112 30 32 7 66 234 83 61 22 151 98 26 27 5 89.2 88.3 91.2 92.4 5 25 6 3 3 19 13 2 4 6 .8 9.4 6.6 4.5 3 6 2 2 4.1 2.3 2.2 3. fi ÌÓ.9 11.6 4 1 2 1 2 2.3 .9 Of non-English-speaking nationalities......... Italian.............................................................. N ativity of fathers not reported........................... 88.0 86.8 87.5 H 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 2 Including one boy, the nationality of whose father was not specified. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 12.0 1 b m 311 E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . CERTIFICATION AND THE SCHOOL. Failure to secure a certificate for the first regular position was much more common, according to Table 153, among the children who went to work during the summer vacation than among those who went to work at any other time. About one-ninth, 11.2 per cent, of the children who went to work during the summer vacation but only one-twentieth, 5 per cent, of those who went to work during the school year held no certificates in their first regular positions. Certificates for some kinds of work were not required by the labor law but only by the compulsory school-attendance law, which speci fied that children must have certificates or home permits in order to remain out of school. For such work, of course, no certificates were required during vacation periods. It is, therefore, not surprising to find that of the children who went to work during summer vacation, 3.1 per cent, but of those who went to work at some other time only 1.2 per cent, were either not required by law to hold certificates in their first regular positions, or else held these positions elsewhere than in Boston. T a b l e 153. — Certification in first regular position, by time o f entering industry, and sex; children interviewed. Children who went to work— During summer vacation. A t some other time. Certification in first regular position, and sex. N um ber. Per cent Num distri ber. bution. Per cent distri bution. 224 100.0 599 100.0 199 159 »40 25 7 »18 88.8 71.0 17.9 11.2 3.1 8.0 569 532 37 30 7 23 95.0 88.8 6.2 5.0 1.2 3.8 B oys.................................... ................................................................................... 121 100.0 356 100.0 Certificated....................................................................................................................... 102 72 30 19 5 14 84.3 59.5 24.8 15.7 4.1 11.6 337 310 27 19 6 13 94.7 87.1 7.6 5.3 1.7 3.7 103 100.0 243 100.0 97 87 10 6 2 4 94.2 84.5 9.7 5.8 1.9 3.9 232 222 10 11 1 10 95.5 91.4 4.1 4.5 .4 4.1 On time....................................: ................................................................................ L a te1.......................................................................................................................... N ot certificated............................................................................................................... Girls........................................................................................................................ 1 B y “ late” is meant more than 10 days after going to work. 2 Including nine children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. 8 Including six children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 312 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. The fact that 8 per cent of the children who went to work during \ the summer, as compared with only 3.8 per cent of those who went to work at some other time, failed to secure certificates for positions for which they were required by law shows that positions for which certificates were not required if the work did not interfere with school attendance do not by any means account for the difference. Failure to secure certificates required by law, as well as merely going to work in positions for which they were not required, appears to have been decidedly more common among children who went to work during a summer vacation than among those who went to work at any other time. For the boys alone the difference is pronounced, 11.6 per cent as compared with 3.7 per cent. More than one boy out of every nine who took his first regular position during the summer vacation did so illegally without an employment certificate. The lack of a certificate does not tell the whole story, for children who were at first employed without certificates were likely to secure them eventually if they held their first positions long enough, gen erally if they held them until school opened in the fall. These chil dren were classified, not as uncertificated but as certificated late, and late certification for first regular positions was far more prevalent among children who went to work during a summer vacation than among those who went to work at any other time. Of all the chil dren who went to work during summer vacation 17.9 per cent, as compared with only 6.2 per cent of those who went to work at some other time, were certificated late. Of the boys who went to work during summer vacations, prac tically one-fourth, 24.8 per cent, were certificated late, and consid erably more than one-third, 36.4 per cent, either were certificated late or illegally held no certificates at all for their first regular positions. Y et of those who went to work at some other time only 7.6 per cent were certificated late and 11.3 per cent were either certificated late or illegally not certificated. Though less pronounced, similar dif ferences were found among the girls, for of those who went to work during summer vacation 13.6 per cent, as compared with only 8.2 per cent of those who went to work at some other time, either held no certificates or failed to secure certificates until they had worked more than a week in first regular positions for which by law certifi cates were required. The children who went directly from school to work— that is, who lost less than a week of school time in the transition—according to Table 154, were less likely to be illegally not certificated but even more likely to be certificated late for their first regular positions than were the children who had an interval of one week or more between leaving school and going to work. Of the children with no interval, 3.2 per cent were illegally not certificated and 7.9 per cent were cer https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 313 E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . -tificated late, while of those with an interval of one week or more 4.3 er cent were illegally not certificated but only 5.4 per cent were cer tificated late. In this respect the same tendency was shown by both boys and girls, but it was more pronounced among thed>oys. Nevertheless, as would be expected from the fact that the children who went to work during vacation were much more likely than those who went to work at any other time to be illegally not certificated or certificated late in their first regular positions, these percentages are small as compared with those for the group of children for whom such intervals as occurred between leaving school and going to work were entirely during vacation. Of the latter group of children 8.5 per cent were illegally not certificated and 16.1 per cent were certificated late in their first regular positions. T able 154.— Certification in first regular position, by amount o f schoov time lost and sex; children interviewed. Children with interval wholly or partly during school term who lost, during interval between leaving school and going to work, specified amount of school time. Certification in first regular position, and sex. None or less than one week. Total. Num ber. Per cent distri bution. N um ber. Per cent distri bution. Children with interval en tirely during vacation. One week or more. Num ber. Per cent distri bution. Num ber. Per cent distri bution. 1600 100.0 341 100.0 258 100.0 223 100.0 1569 i 528 8 41 31 9 422 94.8 88.0 6.8 5.2 1.5 3.7 324 297 27 17 6 11 95.0 87.1 7.9 5.0 1.8 3.2 244 230 14 14 3 11 94.6 89.1 5.4 5.4 1.2 4.3 199 163 36 24 5 19 89.2 73.1 16.1 10.8 2.2 8.5 1355 100.0 222 100.0 132 100.0 122 100.0 Illegally.................................................. 1335 1307 28 20 7 13 94.4 86.5 7.9 5.6 2.0 3.7 '211 191 20 11 4 7 95.0 86.0 9.0 5.0 1.8 3.2 123 115 8 9 3 6 93.2 87.1 6.1 6.8 2.3 4.5 104 75 29 18 4 14 85.2 61.5 23.8 14.8 3 .3 11.5 Girls.................................................... 245 100.0 119 100.0 126 100.0 101 100. Ö 234 221 13 11 2 9 95.5 90.2 5.3 4.5 .8 3.7 113 106 7 6 2 95.0 89.1 5.9 5.0 1.7 3.4 121 115 6 5 96.0 91.3 4.8 4.0 5 4.0 95 88 7 6 1 5 94.1 87.1 6 .9 5.9 1.0 5 .0 4 1 Including one boy for whom amount of school time lost was not reported. * B y “ late” is meant more than 10 days after going to work. Including nine children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. | 4 Including six children who were under 14 when they Degan work in first regular position. In part probably because of the greater tendency of normal and advanced than of retarded children to go to work during a summer 4 94 7 0°—-22------ 21 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 314 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. vacation rather than at any other time, and in part because of them occupations, these children showed a greater tendency than did th^j retarded children both to work illegally without certificates and to be certificated late in their first regular positions. Table 155 shows that 8.8 per-cent of the children from higher grades than normal, 4.9 per cent of those from normal grades, and 3.4 per cent of those from lower grades than normal for their ages were illegally not certificated. A larger proportion of the children from normal grades than of those from higher grades than normal, 12 per cent as compared with 10.3 per cent, but only 5.2 per cent of the retarded children, were certifi cated late. Nearly one-fifth, 19.1 per cent, of the advanced children, and over one-sixth, 16.9 per cent, of the normal children, but only about one-twelfth, 8.6 per cent, of the retarded children, were either illegally not certificated at all or certificated late for their first regular positions. T able 155.— Certification in first regular position, by retardation and sex; children interviewed. Children who, on leaving school, had completed, for their ages— A lower grade than normal. A higher grade Certification in first regular than normal. position, and sex. N um ber. Both sexes................. Certificated........................... On time.......................... L a te 1 .............................. Not certificated.................... Legally and not reported Illegally.......................... Girls............... ............ Certificated........................... On time......................... {j Late................................ Not certificated..................... Legally and not reported Illegally.................... . 1 3 Total. Per Per Per cent N um cent N um cent dis dis dis ber. tribu tribu ber. tribu tion. tion. tion. One or two grades lower than normal. N um ber. Per cent dis tribu tion. Three N ot re or more ported. grades lower than normal. 136 1 0 0 .0 409 1 0 0 .0 267 1 0 0 .0 233 1 0 0 .0 34 11 120 8 8 .2 106 » 14 16 4 3 12 77.9 10.3 93.9 81.9 1 i 20 4.9 8 94.8 90.1 4.7 5.2 1.7 3.4 33 30 3 2.9 95.1 89.9 5.2 4.9 1.5 3.4 221 210 11 12 8 .8 254 240 14 13 4 9 10 10 1 1 .8 384 335 49 ' 25 5 82 1 0 0 .0 238 1 0 0 .0 149 1 0 0 .0 135 1 0 0 .0 14 223 189 34 15 4 141 132 9 94.6 94.8 8 8 .6 6 .0 13 13 8 2 6 5.4 1.3 4.0 128 119 9 7 Boys............................ Certificated.............. ...... ..... On time.......... ............. ¿'. Late............................... ; Not certificated..................... Legally and not reported Illegally....................... A normal grade. 1 2 .0 6 .1 1 .2 54 14 14 4 82.9 65.9 17.1 17.1 4.9 , 10 1 2 .2 11 93.7 79.4 14.3 6.3 1.7 4.6 54 1 0 0 .0 171 1 0 0 .0 118 52 52 96.3 96.3 161 146 15 94.2 85.4 2 3.7 10 1 5.8 113 108 5 •5 .6 2 2 3.7 9 5.3 3 68 . 8 .8 4 8 8 .1 5 6.7 5.2 1.5 3.7 1 1 0 0 .0 98 1 0 0 .0 20 95.8 91.5 4.2 4.2 1.7 2.5 93 91 94.9 92.9 20 2 2 2 .0 5 5.1 8 1 17 3 3 3 2 . 3 3.1 ? y i“ late” is meant more than 1 0 days after going to work. n.m e ehUdren who were under 14 when tliey began work in first regular position. Including six children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 ■\ 315 ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW» The tendency of children from higher grades than normal to be egally not certificated or certificated late in their first regular posi tions more frequently than those from normal grades was due entirely to the boys. Of the girls 5.3 per cent of those from normal grades, as compared with only 3.7 per cent of those from higher grades than normal for their ages, were illegally not certificated, and none of the advanced girls were.certificated late. The retarded girls, as well as the retarded boys, however, showed less tendency both to be illegally not certificated and to be certificated late in their first regular posi tions than did the normal girls and boys. CERTIFICATION AND WORK BEFORE LEAVING SCHOOL. The children who had worked before leaving school were more likely to fail to secure certificates for their first regular positions than were those who had never had any industrial experience, and de cidedly more likely to neglect to secure certificates until they had been at work for more than a week in such positions. Of the chil dren who had worked before leaving school, according to Table 156, 6.2 per cent, and of those who had not worked, only 4.2 per cent were illegally not certificated; but of the first group 12.7 per cent and of "able 156 — Certification in first regular position , by em ploym ent before leaving school, and sex; children interviewed. Children who, before leaving school— Certification in first regular position, and sex. Worked. N um ber. Both sexes.................... Certificated............................. On time............................ Late 2 ................................ Not certificated...................... Legally and not reported. Illegally...............j ......... . Boys......................... . D id not work. Per cent N um distri ber. bution.1 Per cent distri bution. 324 100.0 499 100.0 299 258 »41 25 5 * 20 92.3 79.6 12.7 7.7 1.5 6.2 469 433 36 30 9 21 94.0 86.8 7.2 6.0 1.8 4.2 280 100.0 197 100.0 258 221 37 22 4 18 92.1 78.9 13.2 7.9 1.4 6.4 181 161 20 16 7 9 91.9 81.7 10.2 8.1 3.6 4.6 Girls.............................. 44 100.0 302 106.0 ertifieated............................. yOli time........ .................... Late 2 ................................ t certificated...................... Legally and not reported. Illegally........ ............... 41 37 4 3 1 2 288 272 16 14 2 12 95.4 90.1 5.3 4.6 .7 4.0 Certificated............................. On time............................ L ate*............................... Not certificated. . 1 ................. Legally and not reported. Illegally..... ....................... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 2 B y “ late” is meant more than 10 days after going to work. * Including nine children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. • Including six children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 316 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. the second only 7.2 per cent were certificated late. Of the boys wh had worked before leaving school nearly one-fifth, 19.6 per cent, b, of those who had not worked only about one-seventh, 14.8 per cent, either failed to secure in their first regular positions the certificates required by law or secured them more than a week after going to work. CERTIFICATION AND METHOD OF SECURING POSITIONS. Considerable difference was found among the children who secured their first positions by different methods, as to whether or not they were certificated or took out their certificates only after having worked for 10 days or more in these positions. Table 157 shows that the largest proportion, 7.1 per cent, of first positions which were illegally not certificated was found among children who secured these posi tions through employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus. There were only four of these illegally uncertificated positions, how ever, and in three of them the children were placed by private em ployment agencies. The children who secured their first positions through friends or relatives were somewhat more likely than were those who secured them independently to fail illegally to take ou| certificates. Of the former group 4.7 per cent and of the latter onl 3.8 per cent were illegally not certificated. But a more striking di ference was found between the certification status of children who secured their first regular positions through friends and those who secured them through relatives. Of the former group 6.6 per cent and of the latter only 2.5 per cent failed illegally to secure certificates for these positions. Late certification in first regular positions was far more common among children whose first employers were relatives and among those who seemed their first regular positions through private employment agencies than in any other group. Over one-fifth, 20.6 per cent, of the children whose employers were relatives failed to secure certifi cates until after they had been at work for more than a week. About one-seventh, 14.3 per cent, of the group of children who secured their first positions through employment agencies, schools, or placement bureaus were also certificated late, and all of them were placed by private employment agencies. It should be noted in this connection that in comparatively few, only 4.8 per cent, of the first positions in which the employer was a relative were the children illegally not certificated, but that, as has already been pointed out, illegal failure to secure any certificates at all, as well as failure to secure theifD time, was particularly common among children who secured th first regular positions through private employment agencies. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis vj T ----- 4Children with first position not certificated. Children with first position certificated. Method of securing first regular position. Total. On time. Late. Legally and not reported. Total. Illegally. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um j ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. 823 768 93.3 691 84.0 2 77 9.4 55 6.7 14 1.7 8 41 . 406 381 93.8 344 84.7 37 9.1 25 6.2 6 1.5 19 183 160 63 169 153 59 92.3 95.6 93.7 158 140 46 86.3 87.5 73.0 11 13 13 6.0 8.1 20.6 14 7 4 7.7 4.4 6.3 2 3 1 1.1 1.9 1.6 12 4 3 Per cent.1 5.0 Position secured through: ' 4.7 6.6 2.5 4.8 316 299 94.6 275 87.0 24 7.6 17 5.4 5 1.6 12 3.8 234 44 38 223 41 35 95.3 209 36 30 89.3 14 5 5 6.0 11 3 3 4.7 3 1.3 3.4 2 8 3 1 38 32 2 4 56 52 38 4 3 1 10 35 4 2 :1 10 7 4 25 92.9 78.6 8 27 4 2 1 .............. 10 8 44 3 6 7 1 14.3 4 7.1 4 3 3 1 1 3 1 2 7.1 ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LA W . A ll chil dren. 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Including nine children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. 8 Including six children who were under 14 when they began work in first regular position. 317 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 318 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . CERTIFICATION AND OCCUPATION. > Whether or not an employment certificate is secured or is secured on time for a given position probably depends at least as much upon the employer as upon the child. The principal object of the child in securing a certificate is to stay out of school without being interfered with by an attendance officer, and the principal object of the employer in demanding a certificate is to secure the child’s services without danger of trouble with the factory-inspection department and possible prosecution for violation of the child-labor law. Employers who have in their establishments a number of children, even if only two or three, are much more likely than are employers of only a single child to know the requirements of the law and to be careful not to violate them. In factories where many children are used methods of employ ment are often developed which make it very difficult for any child to secure work without presenting a certificate. This is particularly true in Massachusetts, where in factories certificates of one sort or another are required for employment, not only of children under 16, but of any person under 21 years of age. Employers who have only one child in their service, on the other hand, are sometimes not well acquainted with the legal conditions to be fulfilled and are frequently’ unsystematic in their methods of employment. It is not surprising, therefore, to find that failure to secure certifi cates and late certification are both much more common in occupa tions in which frequently or commonly only one child is employed than in those in which it is customary for a number of children to work for a single employer. In personal and domestic occupations, for example, Table 158 shows that nearly one-third, 30.3 per cent, of all the positions were illegally not certificated, and over one-eighth, 13.5 per cent, were certificated late, whereas in factory and mechan ical occupations less than one-twentieth, 4.6 per cent, were illegally not certificated and only about one-sixteenth, 6.5 per cent, were cer tificated late. Failure to secure the certificates required by law was least common in positions as shoe-factory operatives, where only one position was illegally not certificated, and late certification was least common in positions for cash and messenger work in department stores, where also only one position was certificated late. The estab lishments in which children worked as operatives in the manufacture of clothing or in other needle trades were as a rule decidedly smaller than the shoe factories, and consequently it is not surprising to find that nearly one-tenth, 9.2 per cent, of the positions in these establish-^ ments were illegally not certificated and almost as large a proportion^ 8.6 per cent, were certificated late. V https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . 319 Failure to secure the certificates required by law was more common in positions for office work than for any other except personal and domestic occupations. Of the office-work positions over one-eighth, 13.9 per cent, were illegally not certificated, and practically onetenth, 9.9 per cent, were certificated late. Late certification was more common, however, in selling than in any other kind of position. In nearly one-fourth, 22.4 per cent, of the positions in which the occupation was selling the children did not take out certificates until they had been at work for 10 days or more, and in more than one-ninth, 11.8 per cent, of these positions they failed entirely to take out the certificates required by law. The fact that girls more frequently than boys entered factory and mechanical occupations accounts, in part but not wholly, for the fact that fewer of the positions held by girls than of those held by boys were illegally not certificated or were certificated late. A larger proportion of the positions in personal and domestic occupa tions were also held by girls, but the total number of such positions was very small, only 89, as compared with the number (588) of posi tions for factory and mechanical occupations. Precisely the same ''proportion, 4.3 per cent, of the factory operative positions held by iris as of those held by boys were illegally not certificated, and precisely the same proportion, 5.7 per cent, were certificated late. In messenger, errand, and delivery work both lack of certification and late certification were more common in positions held by boys than in those held by girls. Of positions for this kind of work held by boys 10.8 per cent were illegally not certificated and 13.5 per cent were certificated late, and of those held by girls only 6.9 per cent were illegally not certificated and 12.6 per cent were certificated late. In a number of other occupations, too, classified as “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of g o o d s /’ the propor tion of positions held by boys which were either not certificated at all or certificated late was higher than of those held by girls. In the group as a whole, therefore, not far from one-fourth, 23.3 per cent, of the positions held by'boys but only a little over one-tenth, 10.6 per cent, of those held by girls were either illegally not certificated or certificated late. It may be, of course, that even in these occupa tions boys were more likely than girls to be employed singly, but it appears probable either that girls were more careful to secure certi ficates or'that employers were more careful to demand them for girls. v https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 320 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . T a b l e 158.— Certification, by occupation and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed. Regular positions certificated. 1 Occupation and sex. All regular positions. 4 1,943 On time. Total. Late. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 Num ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. 4 1,731 89.1 «1,542 79.4 2189 9.7 35 39.3 12 13.5 25 10 517 503 194 87.9 89.3 97.5 3 9 38 32 4 6 .5 5.7 2 .0 151 49 19 90 14 81.6 92.4 16 2 8.6 3.8 84.1 10 6 9.3 78.8 75.2 136 10 10.9 9.9 89 47 52.8 46 43 588 563 199 28 19 555 535 198 94.4 95.0 99.5 185 53 19 107 25 167 51 19 100 20 90.3 96.2 1,248 101 1,120 86 89.7 85.1 984 76 213 208 97.7 207 97.2 1 .5 104 76 754 17 101 59 666 8 97.1 77.6 88.3 94 42 565 5 90.4 55.3 74.9 7 17 101 3 6.7 22.4 13.4 4 1,093 ‘ 945 86.5 «810 74.1 135 12.4 Personal service (other"than servants in Clothing factory and other needle 93.5 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and Cash and messenger work— department Packing, wrapping, labeling, an d shipMessenger work, errand and delivery......... 2 38 18 16 35 3 165 140 69 18 16 151 131 68 8 22 41 25 6 20 37 20 872 73 767 66 88.0 90.4 651 57 74.7 78.1 55 53 96.4 52 94.5 34 43 667 17 32 31 585 8 850 '786 92.5 732 86.1 54 6 .4 51 29 ’ 56-9 19 37.3 10 19.6 11 40 423 423 130 10 19 404 404 130 95.5 95.5 100.0 9 10 380 380 128 89.8 89.8 98.5 1 9 24 24 2 5.7 5 .7 1.5 177 31 19 66 161 31 19 63 376 28 353 20 158 70 33 87 Personal service (other"than servants in 91.5 93.6 98.5 137 123 66 2 83.0 87.9 95.6 14 8 2 8.5 5.7 2.9 Clothing factory and other needle 1 1 4 6 5 19 33 14 Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and Cash and messenger work— department 116 9 13.3 12.3 1 1.8 Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipS e llin g .................................................................... Messenger work, errand and delivery......... 87.7 26 21 495 5 74.2 Personal service (other‘than servants in 6 10 90 3 13.5 Clothing factory and other needle 91.0 15 1 8.5 86.4 6 9.1 88.6 20 1 5.3; 146 30 19 57 82.5 93.9 333 19 155 98.1 155 98.1 69 28 81 98.6 68 21 70 97.1 93.1 95.5 Clerical occupations^ wrapping, selling, and Cash and messenger work-—department Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipMessenger work, errand and delivery......... 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Including nine positions where child was under 14 when he began work. * Including one position for which occupation was not reported. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 8Ö.5 1 7 11 *S 1 .4 12.6 321 ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR LAW, able 158.— Certification, by occupatiorj, and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed— Concluded. Regular positions not certificated. Occupation and sex. Both sexes............................................................. Personal and domestic occupations....................... ....... Personal service (other than servants in the home). House and home work........................................— Factory and mechanical occupations............................ Factory operative........................................ ............ Shoe factory...................................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades......... Textile m ill.......... ............................................. Other factory.............................................____ Apprentice and helper—skilled trades.................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods............................... ...... .........s........... - ......... Office work.............................................................. Cash and messenger work—department store........ Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work....................................................................... Selling........................................................................ Messenger work, errand and delivery..................... All other occupations........................ ............................. / Boys...................................................................................... Personal and domestic occupations.................. ................... Personal service (other than servants in the hom e). House and home w ork................................................... Factory and mechanical occupations.................................. Factory operative...................... ........................................ Shoe factory................................................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades............ Textile m ill.............. ..................................................... Other factory......................................... ....................... Apprentice and helper—skilled trades........................ Clerical occupatipns, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.......................................................................... ............. Office w ork............................................................................ •Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work................................................................ ..................... Selling...................................................................................... Messenger work, errand and delivery.......................... All other occupations................................................................. Girls.................. ................... ................................... ........... Personal and domestic occupations.................................... . Personal service (other than servants in the home) House and home w ork...................................................... Factory and mechanical occupations................................ . Factory operative...... ........... ......................................... . Clothing factory and other needle trades........... Other factory......... ................ ........................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods........................................ .............................................. Office w ork................................. .......................................... Cash and messenger work— department store.......... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work................................................................................... Selling.................................................................................... . Messenger work, errand and delivery........................ Legally and not reported. Total. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. 212 10.9 49 2.5 8 163 8.4 27 11 16 27 24 1 17 30.3 6 3 5.6 42 18 24 33 28 1 18 2 7 5 47.2 128 15 5 Per cent.1 15 7 8 6 4 16.9 1 2 1 2 .5 3.8 .9 10.3 14.9 2.3 21 1 1 1.7 1.0 .5 107 14 4 8.5 13.9 1.9 3 17 88 9 2.9 22.4 11.7 1 8 10 7 1.0 10.5 1.3 2 9 78 2 1.9 11.8 10.3 148 13.5 39 3.6 109 10.0 5.6 5.0 .5 9.7 3.8 6.5 20 17 3 14 9 1 2 2 4 5 8.5 6.4 1.4 105 7 2 12.0 9.6 3.6 2 12 82 9 64 9 7 2 5 3 1.0 .7 3.0 2.1 2 1 2 12.3 7.5 22 1 21 19 19 16 3 43.1 23 g 3 6.1 1 5 6 1.4 4.5 4.5 9.0 4 .5 1.9 6 .9 ,'T ‘Not shown where base is less than 50. ' a including seven positions where child was under 14 when he began work. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Illegally. 18 1 7 10 7 10 2.1 1.5 1.2 6 11.8 .2 .2 .6 1 5.5 4.3 1.4 3 3 6 1 1 1 3 1 1 11 10 1 9 6 1 2 4.6 4.3 .5 9.2 .8 .6 87 7 2 1 5 72 2 10.0 9.6 3.6 10.8 54 6.4 16 1 15 18 18 15 3 31.4 20 7 2 5.3 1 4 6 1.4 4.3 4 .3 8 .5 4.5 1.3 6 .9 322 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OF BOSTON . HOUR VIOLATIONS. Five different kinds of hour violations could occur, and each one of these could occur in combination with one or more other kinds. First, a child could work too short hours; that is, less than 6 a day or 36 a week. This was a violation of the school-attendance law and could occur only when school was in session as the restriction related only to employment involving absence from school. Too short weekly hours could be combined with too* long daily hours, with night work, or even possibly with work for seven days a week. Work for less than 6 hours a day could not be combined with either too long daily or too long weekly hours. The second kind of viola tion consisted of work for over 8 hours a day in manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 10 hours a day for express or transportation companies, while the third kind consisted of work for over 48 hours a week in the first group of establishments or for over 54 a week for express or trans portation companies. The fourth kind of violation which could occur was employment at night; that is, before 6.30 a. m. or after 6 p. m. in manufacturing, mechanical, or mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or before 5 a. m. or after 9 p. m. in street trades. The fifth kind was employment for seven days a week.1 Violations, moreover, might occur either in the first occupation entered in a position or in some subsequent occupation pursued while employed in a single position or in another simultaneous posi tion. When a child’s occupation was changed his hours also might be changed. If a child was employed in two positions simultane ously, the second might be for work at night or on Sunday, or the hours in the second, when added to those in the first, might make too long a day or too long a week. In more than one-fifth, 21.2 per cent, of the positions held by all the children interviewed— over one-fourth, 26.3 per cent, of those held by boys but only about one-seventh, 14.7 per cent, of those held by girls— they were employed in their first occupations, as appears in Table 159, in violation of one or another provision of law relating to hours of labor. Wherever one such violation occurred, moreover, two or three provisions of the law were generally broken. In only one-twentieth, 4.9 per cent, of all the positions held did only one violation occur, but in about one-tenth, 10.2 per cent, there were two violations, and in another twentieth, 5.3 per cent, there were three. In four positions all four of the provisions of the labor las; relating to hours of labor were broken, for the children were employed*^ *---------------------------------------------------- :--------------------------------------------- V i Revised Laws 1902, ch. 44, as amended b y acts of 1913, ch. 779, sec. 1; acts of 1913, ch. 831, secs. 8, 9; acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 48; acts of 1913, ch. 831, sec. 15. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis E N F O R C E M E N T OF T H E C H IL D -L A B O R L A W . 323 too long hours a day, too long hours a week, at night, and seven days a week. Three of these positions were held by girls. T a b l e 159. V iola tion o f law in hours o f labor, by sex o f child; regular p o sitio n s held by children interview ed. Regular positions held b y — A ll children. Boys. Girls. Violation of law in hours of labor. All positions. . . . .................... ................. ........... Showing violation of law in hours of labor i................. In first occupation entered..................................... One violation......................................... ! . ! ! ! ! ! Undertime....... .............. IIIIIIIII Day.......................... " " Night............................................. |........... 7-day................................. ” ” Two violations.................................................. Under time and day............................. Under time and night................................ Day and week.................................. ......... Day and night............................................ Day and 7-day........................................ . Week and 7-day................................... ....... Night and 7-day....................................... . Three violations....................... ......................... Under time, day and night........•................ Day, week, and night................................ . Day, week, and 7-day................................. W eek, night, and 7-aay............................. Four violations................................................... Day, week, night, and 7-day In subsequent occupation or simultaneous position. Day....................... ....... ..................................... Night................................................. Day and week................................. Day, week, and night..................................... Hours legal and not excessive 2....................................... Hours excessive but legal 8 .......................... Hours not reported...................................... N um ber. Per cent distribution. N um ber. 1,943 100.0 1,093 100.0 850 100.0 412 402 96 28 42 24 2 199 2 4 162 24 1 4 2 103 3 94 2 4 4 4 10 2 2 3 3 1,444 36 51 21.2 20.7 4.9 1.4 2.2 1.2 .1 10.2 .1 .2 8.3 1.2 .1 .2 .1 5.3 .2 4.8 .1 .2 .2 .2 .5 .1 .1 .2 .2 74.3 1.9 2.6 287 283 59 13 23 21 2 129 1 4 96 21 1 4 2 94 3 86 1 4 1 1 4 26.3 25.9 5.4 1.2 2.1 1.9 .2 11.8 .1 .4 8.8 1.9 .1 .4 .2 8.6 .3 7.9 .1 .4 .1 .1 .4 125 119 37 15 19 3 14.7 14.0 4.4 1.8 2 .2 .4 70 1 8.2 .1 66 3 7 .8 .4 2 1 1 769 8 29 .2 .1 .1 70.4 .7 2.7 Per cent N um distriber. bution. Per cent distribution. 9 1.1 8 1 .9 .1 3 3 6 2 .4 .4 .7 2 2 675 28 22 .2 .2 79.4 3.3 2.6 vioimions. undertime! -Less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week, where child has an employment certificate and works during school hours or is out of school. D ay: Over 8 hours per day in manufac turing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 10 hours per day for express or transportation companies. W eek: Over 48 hours per week in manufacturing, mechanical and mercan tile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 54 per week for express or transportation companies. Night■ Before6.30 a. m . or a ft e r 6 p .m . in manufacturing,mechanical and mercantile establishments, workshops’ etc., or before 5 a. m . or after 9 p . m . in street trades. 7-day: 7 days per week. ' 2 N ot more than 8 hours per day, 48 hours per week, or 6 days per week; no work before 6.30 a. m . or after 6 p . m ., and not less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week where child has employment certificate and works during school hours or is out of school. 8 Including three positions showing also an undertime violation. These children worked irregular hours, less than 36 a week, but either more than 8 hours on certain days or else at night. Positions in which the children worked too short hours— that is, less than six a day or 36 a week— were somewhat uncommon. In 28 positions, or 1.4 per cent of the total number, this kind of viola tion occurred alone. In addition, there were two cases in which the ^weekly hours were too short but the daily hours too long; in four the daily or weekly hours were too short but there was night work, and in three too short weekly hours were combined with both night work and too long daily hours. In about 1 position in 50, therefore, or, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 324 TH Ë WORKING CHILDREN OE BOSTON. to be exact, 1.9 per cent of all the positions, the children worked too short hours. Undertime alone was more common among the girls, but, combined with violations of other laws relating to hours of labor, it was more common among the boys. Too long daily hours were generally accompanied by too long weekly hours, and the latter form of violation seldom occurred except in connection with the former. In only 42 positions were the daily hours alone too long, but in 162 both the daily and the weekly hours were too long, and in 93 others the night-work law also was violated. When all the positions in which the horns per day were longer than permitted by law are added together, regardless of whether the vio lation occurred in subsequent occupations or simultaneous positions and also of whether it was accompanied by other violations, it is found that in over one-sixth, 17.5 per cent, of all the positions— over one-fifth, 21.4 per cent, of those held by boys, but only about oneeighth, 12.6 per cent, of those held by girls— the provisions of law relating to daily hours were violated. Similarly, when all the posi tions in which the hours per week were longer than permitted by law are added together it is found that in about one-seventh, 14.2 per cent, of all positions— over one-sixth, 17.7 per cent, of those held by boys, but less than one-tenth, 9.6 per cent, of those held by girls the provisions of law relating to weekly Hours were violated. In only eight cases were the weekly hours too long without the daily hours also being too long, and in all of these the children worked seven days a week— in four cases working also at night. Evidently violations of the legal provisions relating to hours per week were somewhat less common than of those relating to hours per day and were almost always accompanied by the latter. Employment of children, particularly boys, in night work was not at all uncommon. In about one-twelfth, 8.4 per cent, of all the posi tions held by the children interviewed, they were employed in viola tion of the night-work law. In only 19, or 2.2 per cent, of the posi tions held by girls, but in 144, or 13.2 per cent, of those held by boys night work was required. In other words, the boys were employed at night in over one-eighth of all the positions which they held. In 26 cases night work occurred without any other violation, but in 4 cases it was combined with undertime, in 24 with too long daily hours, in 2 with a seven-day week, in 3 with both too short hours per week and too long hours per day, in 96 with both too long hours per day and per week, and in 4 with too long hours both per day and per week and a seven-day week. Positions in which children were required to work seven days a week were relatively rare, this kind of violation being found in only https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF TH E CHILD-LABOR L A W . 325 1 position out of every 100 held by these children. Like positions requiring night work, they were much more frequently held by boys than by girls. Of the 19 positions requiring work for seven days a week 15 were held by boys. A few cases were found in which, although no violation of any law relating to hours actually existed because hours in the particular occupations concerned were not regulated, violations would have existed if the 8-hour day, 48-hour week, 6-day week, and night work provisions in force for other occupations had been in effect for these. Most of these cases, 28 out of 36, were in positions held by girls. In nearly three-fourths, 74.3 per cent, of all the positions held by these children, however, the hours were not only legal but were not excessive— that is, were not over 8 a day or 48 a week— and did not involve work at night— that is, before 6.30 a. m.,or after 6 p. m.— or for more than six days a week. In over seven-tenths, 70.4 per cent, of the positions held by boys and nearly eight-tenths, 79.4 per cent, of those held by girls, the horns of labor fell within these limits. Violations of law as to hours of labor were most likely to occur, according to Table 160, in the positions held by children of foreignborn fathers, especially in those held by children whose fathers were of non-English-speaking nationalities, and particularly in those held by Russian-Jewish children. Such violations were found in only 17.9 per cent of the positions held by children of native fathers, but in 22 per cent of those held by children of foreign-born fathers, 24.7 per cent of those held by children whose fathers were of non-Englishspeaking nationalities, and 28.6 per cent of those held by RussianJewish children. In this respect much less difference was found between the girls than between the boys whose fathers were native and foreign born. Of the positions held by the daughters of native fathers 13.9 per cent and of those held by the daughters of foreign-born fathers 15 per cent involved hour violations. Of those held by the sons of native fathers, on the other hand, 20.6 per cent, and of those held by the sons of foreign-born fathers 27.7 per cent involved such violations. Of the positions held by boys whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities not far from one-third, 31.7 per cent, and of those held by Russian-Jewish boys about the same pro portion, 31.6 per cent, involved illegal hours. Much more difference was found between the Russian-Jewish girls and all the girls whose fathers were foreign born of non-English-speaking nationalities in the ^'matter of hour violations; for in nearly one-fourth, 24 per cent, of the positions held by the former but only 18.2 per cent of those held by the latter were such violations discovered. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 326 T th e able w o r k in g c h il d r e n of boston . 160.— Violation o f law in hours o f labor, by nationality o f father and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed. R e g u la r p o sitio n s in w h ich — V io la tio n s o f la w as t o h ou rs o f la b o r o ccu rred .1 N a tion a lity o f father a n d s e x o f ch ild . A ll regular p o si tio n s. I n first o c c u p a tio n entered. T o ta l. I n su b seq u en t o cc u p a tio n or sim ultaneous p o sitio n . P er ce n t.4 N um b e r. P er c e n t.4 N um b e r. P er c e n t.4 N um b e r. 1,943 412 21.2 402 20.7 10 0 .5 459 Children of native fathers................................. Children of foteign-born fathers....................... 51,424 574 Of English-speaking nationalities............. 382 Irish....................................................... 192 Other.................................................... 845 Of non-English-speaking nationalities----485 Italian.................................................. 192 Russian-Jewish.................................... 168 Other.................................................... Children the nativity of whose fathers was not 60 reported......................................... ................ 82 5 313 100 58 42 209 117 55 37 17.9 22.0 17.4 15.2 21.9 24.7 24.1 28.6 22.0 81 6304 96 55 41 204 114 54 36 17.6 21.3 16.7 14.4 21.4 24.1 23.5 28.1 21.4 1 9 4 3 1 5 3 1 1 .2 .6 .7 .8 •5 .6 .6 •5 .6 4 .4 4 2 1 1 2 2 .5 .5 .4 .8 .5 1.0 Both sexes....................... ........................ Boys........................ ...................... - — . Children of native fathers................................. Children of foreign-born fathers...................... . Of English-speaking nationalities............. Irish...................................i . . .............. Other............................................ . Of non-English-speaking nationalities----Italian............................ ................. Russian-Jewish................................... Other............................................— Children the nativity of whose fathers was not reported................. ..................... . ............... Girls...... .............................. ................. Children of native fathers.............................. Children of foreign-born fathers....................... Of English-speaking nationalities............. Irish...................................................... Other.................................................... Of non-English-speaking nationalities...... Italian................................................... Russian-Jewish.................................... Other.............. .................................. Children the nativity of whose fathers was not reported..................................... ............ ....... 17 28.3 17 28.3 1,093 287 26.3 283 25.9 5 779 364 239 125 410 201 56 5 216 82 46 36 130 64 37 29 20 6 27! 7 22.5 19.2 28.8 31.7 31.8 31.6 31.5 56 5 212 80 45 35 128 62 37 29 20.6 27.2 22.0 18.8 28.0 31.2 30.8 31.6 31.5 . ___ 15 42 15 850 125 14.7 119 14.0 6 .7 187 13.9 15.0 8 .6 8 .4 9 .0 18.2 18.7 24.0 10.5 25 92 16 10 6 76 52 17 7 13.4 14.3 7.6 7 .0 9 .0 17.5 18.3 22.7 9 .2 1 5 2 2 .5 .8 1.0 1.4 435 284 75 76 26 97 18 12 6 79 53 18 8 3 1 1 1 .7 .4 1 .3 1.3 18 2 210 143 2 j 1 1 V iolation s.— U n d ertim e: L ess th a n 6 h ou rs p e r d a y or 36 p e r w eek , w h ere c h ild has a,n e m p lo y m e n t certificate a n d w ork s d u rin g s ch o o l hou rs or is o u t o f sch o o l. D a y : O v e r 8 h ou rs p e r d a y in m an u factu r in g , m ech a n ica l, a n d m ercan tile establishm ents, w o rk sh o p s, e t c ., or o v e r 10 h ou rs p e r d a y far express or tra n sporta tion com p a n ies. W e e k : O v e r 48 h ou rs p er w eek i n m an u factu rin g, m ech a n ica l, a n d m e rca n tile establishm ents, w ork sh op s, e t c ., o r o v e r 54 p e r w eek for e xpress or tra n sporta tion co m p a n ie s. N ig h t: B efore 6.30 a. m . or after 6 p . m . i n m an u factu rin g, m ech an ical, a n d m erca n tile establish m en ts, w o r k sh op s, e tc ., o r b efore 5 a. m . o r a fter 9 p . m . in street trades. 7 d a y s : 7 d a y s p e r w eek . 1 N o t s h o w n w h ere base is less th a n 50. , , . _ . , 6 In clu d es fiv e p o s itio n s h e ld b y a b o y , th e n a tio n a lity o f w h o se fa th e r w as n o t re p o rte d . I n fo u r o f these p osition s v io la tio n s o ccu rre d . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ENFORCEMENT OF TH E CHILD-LABOR LA W . Table 160 . 327 R a t i o n o f law in hours o f labor, by nationality o f father and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interviewed— Concluded. Regular positions in whichHours were legal and not excessive.2 Nationality of father and sex of child. Hours were excessive but legal.8 Hours were not reported. Per cent.4 Number. Number. 1,444 74.3 36 354 51,050 445 304 141 604 353 130 77.1 73.7 77.5 79.6 73.4 71.5 72.8 67.7 72.0 66.7 13 Number. B o th s e x e s ...................................... C hildren o f n a tiv e fa th ers....................... C hildren o f foreign -born fa th ers .. ................................... O f English-speaking n a tion a lities.’. " .......................... I n s h . . ........................... ...................... O th e r...................................................................... . O f n on -E n glish -sp eak in g nationalities * ' " .............. Ita lia n ............................................... ........... R ussia n -J ew ish .........""" O th e r .................................. ........................................... C hildren th e n a tiv ity o f w h ose fathers w as n o t "reported' 12 1 40 B o y s ...................................................... C hildren o f n a tiv e fa th ers............... C hildren o f foreign -born fath ers.’.". .........1 O f E nglish-speaking nationalities. . . ’. ................ I n s h ................................. .................... O th e r.......................... ..................................................... O f non -E n glish -speak in g n a tion a lities! . ] .................. I ta lia n ................................ .............. R ussia n -J ew ish ____ O th e r.................................. .......................................... h ild ren th e n a tiv ity o f w h ose fathers w as n o t reported. — G irls ........ .................................................... _ C hildren o f n a tiv e fa th ers........ ......................... C hildren o f foreign -born f a t h e r s . .................. O f E nglish-speaking nationalities’.".’. ’. ! ! ! .................... I r is h ........................................ O th er................................ ............................................... O f n on -E n glish-speakin g n ationalities ! ’ ’ ! ! ! ............ Ita lia n ................ .......... R u ssian -Jew ish ............... [ ” O th e r.................................. ............................................* C hildren th e n a tiv ity o f w h ose fathers w as n o t re p orted . 13 3 9 3 2 4 1 70.4 8 77.2 68.3 74.5 77.4 3 5 86 2 .8 22 769 260 127 77 56 27 ___ ] ± 10 210 532 271 185 Per cent.4 . 51 2 .6 10 2 .2 1.5 2.3 39 16 2 .6 1 .6 1 .1 .6 1 .0 10 6 23 2.4 1.7 5 2 .6 6 2 3.6 3.3 .7 29 2.7 1 .1 .6 3 26 1 .1 12 1 1 .3 .4 4 2 1 .0 1 .0 2 2 .2 3 5 6 8 .8 63.4 63.2 65.8 60.9 Per cent.4 10 7 3 16 8 2.7 2 .8 2 .0 3.1 2.7 2.5 3.3 2.7 2.9 2 4 3Ì 9 4.0 5.’ 4 675 79.4 28 3.3 22 2.6 144 518 174 119 55 344 226 53 65 13 77.0 80.3 82.9 83.2 82.1 79.1 79.6 . 70.7 85.5 10 17 12 9 3 5 1 2 2 1 5.3 2.6 5.7 6.3 4.5 1.1 .4 2.7 2.6 7 13 6 3 3 7 4 2 1 2 3.7 2 .0 2 .9 2.1 4 .5 1.6 1.4 2 .7 1.3 « -------------- -. • 6 days per week; no work before 6.30 a. m . or after ~ UUU1 TOOl/uau UJLLULLLSper QU-YOTOb per where child has employment certificate and works during school hours or is out of school. ! i 1“ ?® P r i o n s , showing also an undertime violation. , * Not shown where base is less than 50. these po^tions^folations in li ours occurred® nationality of whose father was https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis p o r te d . In four of T able 161. — Violation o f law in hours o f labor, by occupation and sex o f child; regular positions held by children interviewed. Regular positions in which— Violations of law as to hours of labor occurred.1 All regular posi tions. Hours were legal In subsequent and not excessive.* In first occupation occupation or simul taneous posi entered. tion. Total. Number. Per cent .4 Per cent.4 Number. B o t h s exes...................................... , ......... . 412 21.2 402 20.7 P erson a l a n d d om estic o cc u p a tio n s .............. P erson al service (oth e r th a n servants in th e h o m e ) ............................................... H ou s e a n d h o m e w o r k ................................ F a c to r y a n d m ech a n ica l o cc u p a tio n s .......... . F a c to r y o p e ra tiv e ....................................... . S h oe fa c t o r y ............................................ C loth in g fa c to r y a n d other need le tra d e s ................................... ............... T e x tile m ill............................................ C a n d y fa c t o r y ....................................... O ther fa c to r y .......................................... A p p r e n tice a n d helper— skilled tra d e s.. C lerica l occu p ation s, w rap p in g , selling, a n d d e liv e ry o f g o o d s .:.......................................... O ffice w o r k ...................................................... Cash a n d m essenger w ork — departm en t store...................................................... ......... P a ck in g , w rap p in g , labeling, a n d sh ip p in g-room w o r k ......................................... S elling................................................................ M essenger w ork , erran d a n d d e l iv e r y .. A ll other o cc u p a tio n s .......................................... 21 23.6 21 23.6 B o y s ........................... ................................... P erson a l a n d d om estic o cc u p a tio n s ............... P erson a lservise (oth er th a n servan ts in th e h o m e ) *,A'.............................................. H ou s e f jp i j ^ j m e w o r k ................................ https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 46 43 588 563 199 20 1 95 90 11 46 g 3' 22 20 1 92 87 15.6 15.5 11 5 .5 24.9 15.1 44 8 2 0 .6 21 16. 2 16 0 5.5 5 1,248 292 101 213 Per cent.4 Number. 10 3 a 5 3 .5 .5 23.8 15. i 2 1 .1 19.6 1 .9 22.8 8.9 7 3 5 23.4 99 285 9 .6 74.3 36* 1L® 5 51 2.6 31 34.8 29* 32.. 6. 8 9.0 81.3 81.5 92.5 4 4 15 14 4 2.6 2.5 2.0 135 44 16 80 i9 731.0 83.0 4 1 2.2 1.9 74.8 5 1 4.7 925 89 74.1 8 8 .1 27 2 2.2 2.0 21 10 478 459 184 1 28 4 .3 9L5 3 1 .4 87.5 48.7 2.9' 2iM 769 70.4 2:.T 34 4 4 .7 223 29.6 32 220 2 3 25.9 4 .4 4 283 1,444 91 37 513 10 1 .0 2 .6 .4 26.3 Per cent.4 Number. 195 8.7 42.1 29.2 ................... Pter eerct. 41 1 7 .0 9 4 Number. LO 15 7.0 9 Per cent.4* Hours were not reported. 1 6 15 Num ber. Hours were exces sive but Legal!-3* 6 8 .0 3 3.9 1 .1 3 2 17 .7 &29 2t3; 3 8 » 1,093 287 38 18 18 14 1 5 18 18 12 2 1 4 1 T H E W O R K IN G C H IL D R E N OE BOSTON , Occupation and sex. u r ‘4 9 4 7 0 Girls................. ............................................ 850 Personal and do&estic occupations............... Personal service (other than servants in the h om e).................................................... House and home work................................ Factory and mechanical occupations............ Factory operative......................................... Shoe factory............................................ Clothipg factory and other needle trades................... ................. ............ Textile m ill.............................................. Candy factory......................................... Other factory......................................... Clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods............................................... Office w ork..................................................... Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store.................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work, ielli Selling Messenger work, errand and delivery. . 165 140 69 . 26 21 4 15.8 15.0 5.8 8 22 41 25 5 3 9 5 872 73 239 3 27.4 4.1 55 5 34 43 667 17 5 19 207 4 26 21 4 15.8 15.0 5.8 5 3 9 5 81.8 82.9 92.8 26.9 4.1 9.1 5 31.0 5 17 205 4 125 14.7 51 3 5.9 11 40 423 423 130 2 1 69 69 7 16.3 16.3 5.4 2 1 66 66 7 177 31 41 5 3 13 23.2 376 28 53 7 158 70 33 87 4 .5 70.0 94.5 9.1 50 90.9 30.7 2 2 .3 28 20 443 10 119 14.0 6 .7 675 79.4 3 5.9 17 33.3 15.6 15.6 5.4 3 3 .7 .7 9 8 343 343 120 81.1 81.1 92.3 39 5 3 12 22.0 2 1.1 18.2 1 1.5 14.1 50 6 13.3 3 1 .8 10 6.3 10 6.3 5 15 16 7.1 4 15 15 5.7 1 1.4 17.2 1 1.1 18.4 * 132 25 16 50 2?4 2.1 1.4 1 610 69 19.7 ■/ I I | 1 3 19 30 19 235 3 19 66 135 116 64 66.4 4 .5 19 1 3 i 3 .1 16 2.4 28 3.3 22 2.6 28 54.9 2.2 1.4 1 5.9 28 74.6 | 11 11 3 2.6 2.6 2.3 4 1 2.3 75.8 3 4.5 83.8 8 1 2.1 145 91.8 3 1.9 63 17 70 90.0 2 1 1 2.9 315 20 80.5 1.1 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 329 } Violations.— Undertime; Less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week, where child has an employment certificate and works during school horns or is out of school. D a y Over 8 hours per davrn manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 10 hours per day for express or transportation oompanies Week- Over 48 hours per week m manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 54 per week for express or transportation companies. Night: Before 6.30 a. m . or after 6 p . m . in manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops etc., or before 5 a. m . or after 9 p. m . in street trades. 7-day- 7 days per week * N ot more than 8 hours per day, 48 hours per week, or 6 days per week; no work before 6.30 a. m . or after 6 p . m .; and not less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week where child has employment certificate and works during school horns or is out of school. . * Including three positions showing also an undertime violation. 4 N ot shown where base is less than 50. * Including one position for which occupation was not reported. ENFORCEMENT OF THE CHILD-LABOR L A W . Factory and mechanical occupations.......... Factory operative............................. ______ Shoe fa c to ry .......................................... Clothing factory and other needle trades................................................... . Textile m ill............................................ . Other factory.......................................... Apprentice and helper— skilled trades.. Clerical occupations,wrapping, selling, and delivery of goods.............................................. Office work...................................................... Cash and messenger work— depart m ent store................................................... Packing, wrapping, labeling, and shipping-room work......... ............... Selling............................................................... Messenger work, errand and d elivery.. A ll other occupations......................................... 330 TH E WORKING CHILDREN OF BOSTON. The difference in the matter of hour violations between the chib dren of the various nationality groups, as well as that between the boys and the girls, was due primarily to differences in occupations. Violations of the laws restricting hours, like those of the laws requiring employment certificates, are much more likely to occur, as appears in Table 161, in occupations where as a rule only one child is hired by a single employer than in those in which a number of children are 'usually employed in a single establishment. Thus in nearly onefourth, 23.6 per cent, of all the positions in personal and domestic occupations but in less than one-sixth, 16.2 per cent, of those in factory and mechanical occupations, were hour violations found. Moreover, as in the case of illegal or late certification, there was a striking difference between shoe factory operative positions and positions as operatives in clothing factories or other needle trades. Of the former little more than one-twentieth, 5.5 per cent, but of the latter practically one-fourth, 24.9 per cent, involved violations of the laws relating to hours of labor. The proportion of positions in “ clerical occupations, wrapping, selling, and delivery of. goods” in which hour violations occurred was almost as high, 23.4 per cent, as of positions in clothing factories and other needle trades. An even larger proportion, 29.6 per cent, of the messenger, errand, and delivery work positions involved hour violations. But decidedly the largest proportion of positions involving such violations, 44.7 per cent, not far from half, was found among positions in which the occupation was “ selling.” If the figures in Table 161 are compared with those in Tables 110, 118, and 119, which give the occupational distribution of children of the different sexes and the different fathers’ nationalities, it appears obvious that this occupational distribution accounts in general for the differences in hour violations found in positions held by children of the different groups. Table 162 shows further the close relationship between hour viola tions and failure to obtain employment certificates or to obtain them on time. Of all the positions in which the hours were legal and not excessive only 7.7 per cent were not certificated, 5.3 per cent illegally not certificated, and 8 per cent certificated late; but of those in which any kind of hour violation occurred 15.5 per cent were not certificated, 14.6 per cent illegally not certificated, and 15 per cent certificated late. To a certain extent this may be due to greater carelessness as to the hours of labor of children who did not hold employment certificates, but primarily and fundamentally it is due to the fact that hour violations were most likely to occur in th^ same occupations as violations of the certificate law— occupations) in which employers hired single children rather than groups of children. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 331 ENFORCEMENT OF TH E CHILD-LABOR L A W . able 162.— Certification, by violation o f law in hours o f labor, and sex o f child; regular position s held by children interviewed. Regular positions certificated. Violation of law in hours of labor, and sex. AU regular positions. Total. On tim e. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Late. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 Positions held b y both sexes.. . . . . 1,943 1,731 89.1 1,542 79.4 *189 9.7 Showing violation of law in hours of labor 4. . . Hours legal and not excessive5....................... Hours excessive but legal6......................... ..... Hours not reported...................................... ....... 412 1,444 36 51 348 1,333 17 33 84.5 92.3 69.4 84.3 58.8 62 116 8 3 15.0 8.0 64.7 286 1,217 9 30 Positions held b y boy s................. ..... 1,093 945 86.5 810 74.1 135 12.4 287 769 8 29 238 686 3 18 82.9 89.2 193 600 1 16 67.2 78.0 45 86 2 2 15.7 11.2 Showing violation of law in hours of labor 4 Hours legal and not excessive6....................... Hours excessive but legal8...... ......................... Hours not reported.............................................. Positions held b y girls............................ Showing violation of law in hours of la b o r4 Hours legal and not excessive5....................... Hours excessive but legal6............................... Hours not reported................................ ............. 5.9 850 786 92.5 732 86.1 54 6.4 125 675 28 22 110 647 14 15 88.0 95.9 93 617 8 14 74.4 91.4 Ì7 30 6 1 13.6 4.4 Regular positions not certificated. Violation of law in hours of labor, and sex. LegaUy and not reported. Total. Illegally. N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 N um ber. Per cent.1 Positions held b y both sexes..................... 212 10.9 49 2.5 *163 - 8.4 Showing violation of law in horns of labor 4. . Hours legal and not excessive5. ............ ............ Hours excessive but legal6.................................... Hours not reported................................................... 64 111 19 15.5 7.7 1.0 2.4 7.8 60 76 13 14 14.6 5.3 35.3 4 35 6 4 27.5 Positions held b y boy s................................ 148 13.5 39 3.6 109 10.0 Showing violation ofJaw in hours of lab or4. . Hours legal and not excessive5............................ Hours excessive but legal6..................................... Hours n o t reported................................... .. 49 83 5 11 17.1 10.8 3 29 3 4 1.0 3.8 46 54 2 7 16.0 7.0 Positions held b y girls................................. 64 7.5 10 1.2 54 6.4 Showing violation of law in hours of lab or4. . Hours legal and not excessive5............................ Hours excessive but legal8..................................... Hours not reported................................................... 15 28 14 7 12.0 4.1 1 6 3 .8 .9 14 22 11 7 11.2 3.3 18 1 N ot shown where base is less than 50. 5 Includes 9 positions held b y children who were under 14 when they began work. * Includes 7 positions held b y children who were under 14 when they began work. 4 Violations.— Undertime: Less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week, where child has an employment certificate and works dining school hours or is out of school. D ay: Over 8 hours per day in manufactur in g, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workshops, etc., or over 10 hours per day for express or transportation companies. W eek: Over 48 hours per week in manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile ¿establishments, workshops, etc., or over 54 per week for express or transportation companies. Night: fl^ to r^ 6.30 a. m . or after 6 p . m . in manufacturing, mechanical, and mercantile establishments, workm o ] ) s , etc., or before 5 a. m . or after 9 p . m . in street trades. Seven day: Seven days per week. N ot more than 8 hours per day, 48 hours per week, or 6 days per week; no work before 6.30 a. m . or xater 6 p . m .; and not less than 6 hours per day or 36 per week where child has employment certificate and works during school hours or is out of school. 8 Including two positions held by boys and one by a girl, showing an undertime violation also. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OCCUPATIONS, HOURS, AND WAGES THREE YEARS LATER. For the children interviewed additional information was secured as to occupations, hours of labor, and wages in 1918, when, though still minors and therefore subject to a few legal restrictions, they were no longer limited by the strict provisions of the child-labor law. A t' that time these children had been at work from nearly three to not far from five years during a period of considerable increase in demand for labor due to the World War and especially to the entrance of this country into that war. They still had to hold certificates for em ployment in most occupations, but these were merely “ educational” certificates which were only a form, as the children were no longer obliged to attend continuation school and, as they had all proved their literacy before receiving their employment certificates, none of them was obliged to attend evening school. In a considerable numcates. mechanical, and mercantile establishments, and in most other com mon employments were limited by the woman’s work law to 10 a day, 54 a week, and 6 days a week, and night work was prohibited between 10 p. m. and 5 a. m. (between 6 p. m. and 5 a. m. in textile manufacturing). The hours of the boys were unregulated, except that if they were employed as messengers they could not work be tween 10 p. m. and 5 a. m.10 Both boys and girls were prohibited from work in certain occupations dangerous to morals.11 Otherwise they could work whenever and wherever they pleased. About two-fifths, 39.8 per cent, of the children interviewed— 38.2 per cent of the boys and 42.2 per cent of the girls—replied to the questionnaire sent out in 1918. Of the 182 boys who replied, how ever, 37 had enlisted in the service of the United States or Canada, and the information as to the occupations., hours, and wages of this group was not, of course, comparable with similar information for the group of boys who were engaged in civilian occupations. In the following tables, therefore, these enlisted boys are excluded from the percentages, which are based upon the 146 girls and the 145 bovs engaged in civilian occupations who replied to the questionnaires? 10 Occupations furnishing public service, in case of extraordinary emergency, and delivery to a newspaper^ office of messages directly connected with the business of publishing a newspaper were exempted. Acts of 1909, ch. 514, sec. 48, as amended b y Acts of 1916, ch. 222; Acts of 1913, ch. 831, secs. 9,10. » Acts of 1913, ch. 831, secs. 7 ,9 ,1 0 . * 33? https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis O C C U P A T IO N S, H O U R S, A N D W AG E S T H R E E YEARS L A TE R . 333 The children who could be located in 1918 or who, when they received .e questionnaire, replied to it, may have been, upon the whole, more prosperous than those who were not located or who failed to give the desired information. Those who were engaged in purely manual occupations involving no use of their school training may have been less likely to write out and post their answers to the questions asked them. Of the children who did reply a somewhat larger proportion, 18 per cent, had entered industry from higher grades and a somewhat smaller proportion, 29.6 per cent,