View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
FRANCES PERKINS, Secretary

WOMEN’S BUREAU
MARY ANDERSON, Director

WOMEN
IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES
1937

Bulletin

of the

Women’s Bureau,

No. 162

UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1938

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C.




Price 10 cents

—




CONTENTS
Letter of transmittalintroduction ________________
Scope of the survey_
Size of establishmentHours of work_
Week’s earnings—
Hourly earnings___________ ____
Summary of chief findings
Factories____________________
IntroductionHours ______________
Scheduled hours________
Hours worked__
Earnings________________
Average week’s earnings________
Distribution of week’s earnings
Extent of piece work
Learners_______________
Week’s earnings and hours worked
Average hourly earnings________ .
Distribution of hourly earuincs
Year’s earnings
Negro women____________ _______
Retail stores__________________
Introduction__________ ^
Women regular employees__ I_________'____
Hours of work_________________ ~___
Week’s earnings___________ ____
Average week’s earnings and hours worked'
Earnings in department stores__ __ ___ _
Earnings in ready-to-wear stores____ “““
Earnings in limited-price or variety stores.
Women part-time employees__ i_________
Earnings and hours
Laundries__________________________
~ “ ~
Introduction_______________ _____
Commercial laundries__________ ~___
Location and size____________________~ '
Hours of work_______
Week’s earnings__________
Hourly earnings__________
Year’s earnings__________
Hotel and restaurant laundries.
Hours worked____________
Earnings_______________
Dry-cleaning establishments—
Hours__________________
Week’s earnings____________ __ —V———
Hourly earnings_______________________
Year’s earnings____________
Hotels and restaurants________________ I—II
Introduction____________________~____
Hours_________________________ ~_____
Scheduled hours____________ ~___ ~~~
Earnings__________________
Week’s earnings___________________~~~
Earnings and time worked
............
Tips----------------------------------------------Rate of pay and scheduled weekly hours
Uniforms_____________
'
66138—38




Page
V

1
2

3
3
4
5

6

8

8

9

10

10
10
10
11
11
12
12
12

14
14
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19

20
20
21
21

23
23
23
23
24
25
26
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
34
34
36
36
37
38

IV

CONTENTS

TABLES
Page

1. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed, by industry group-------------------------------------------2. Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women, by industry group—
3. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed, by industry—Factories-----------------------------------4. Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women—Factories-----------5. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed—Retail stores---------- ------------------------------------6. Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women—Retail stores-----7. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed—Laundries---------------------------------- ;----------------8. Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women—Laundries------------9. Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women—Dry cleaning------­
10. Number of establishments visited and number, sex, and race of their
employees—Hotels and restaurants----------------------------------------11. Comparison of hours of work and spread of hours, long employeedays in hotels and restaurants-------------------- --------:------ -—12. Week’s cash earnings of women, by department in which employed
and by whether or not receiving additions to wages—Hotels and
restaurants--------------------------------------------------------------------------




2

5
9
13

16

19
23
26
29
31
33
33

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
United States Department of Labor,
Women’s Bureau,

Washington, April 19, 1938.
Madam : I luve the honor to transmit a report on the earnings and
hours of women employed in the industries of Kentucky in the late
months ot 1937. The survey was made at the request of the Louis­
ville League of Women Voters and the Kentucky Department of
Agriculture, Labor, and Statistics.
Jr
u
I very much appreciate the courteous cooperation of the employers
and other persons within the State who made this study possible.
ie survey was conducted by Ethel L. Best, industrial supervisor
and the report has been written by Ethel Erickson, industrial super­
visor, and by Ora Marshmo and Arthur T. Sutherland, of the
editorial division.
’
Respectfully submitted.
,,
L,
Mary Anderson, Director.
Lion r ranges Perkins,
Secretary of Labor.




v

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937
INTRODUCTION
At the request of the Louisville League of Women Voters and the
Kentucky Department of Agriculture, Labor, and Statistics a survey
of women’s wages and hours of work in the important womanemploying industries of Kentucky was made by the Women’s Bureau
of the United States Department of Labor in the late months of
1937. The industries covered were factories, retail stores, laundries,
dry-cleaning establishments, and hotels and restaurants. The sample
obtained was sufficiently large to be representative of the different
types of establishment in each industry and of the different areas
m the State.
The census of 1930 gave 146,678 as the number of gainfully em­
ployed women 10 years of age and over in Kentucky. The most
important fields of work of these women were domestic and personal
service, with 35 percent of the total, and manufacturing, professional
service, and clerical occupations, each with about 14 percent. The
chief woman-employing industries in manufacturing were clothing,
cigars and other tobacco products, textiles, food products, and paper
and printing. Each employment mentioned, except professional
service and clerical occupations, is represented in the present study.
Later data on employment figures for men and women separately
are not available, but the size of the industries covered is indicated
by figures on total employment contained in recent reports of the
Bureau of the Census. Reports of the Census of Manufactures and
the Census of Business for 1935 gave 4,144 establishments and 86,114
men and women. The vast majority of the employees, 67,456, were
in manufacturing industries, not all of which wrere included in the
survey by the Women’s Bureau. Important groups also were re­
ported in the other industries included in this survey; 6,964 were
in stores, including department, women’s ready-to-wear, and limitedprice or variety stores; 4,274 were in restaurants; 3,487 in hotels;
3,144 in laundries; and 789 in dry-cleaning plants.
According to a report of the State Planning Board, “the concen­
tration of manufacturing is greater in Kentucky than in any other
southeastern State.” More than half of the total in 1929 was in
the city of Louisville, and Louisville has relatively larger concerns
than other cities in the State. Besides Louisville, important manu­
facturing centers are Covington, Newport, Henderson, Lexington,
Chvensboro, Paducah, and Ashland.1 Data showing this marked
concentration are given also in the Census of Manufactures report
for 1935. In that year 49 percent of the workers reported were in
1 Kentucky.

State Planning Board.




Progress Report, 1935, p. 11.

1

2

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

Louisville, and more tlian half of the total pay roll in Kentucky was
paid to Louisville workers.
Scope of the survey.
In the survey by the Women’s Bureau, establishments in the vari­
ous industries were scheduled in 33 cities and towns.2 Pay-roll data
were obtained in 359 establishments, and at the time of the survey
these employed 41,418 workers. Of this number, 53 percent were
women; by major industry group women comprised from 47 percent
of the workers in factories to 83 percent of those in laundries. The
distribution of the workers, by industry and by sex, is shown in the
scope table following.
Table 1.—Number

of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed, by industry group
Number

Industry group

Wood and metal furniture__ ____________ ______ ___

lishments

Number of employees
Men

Total

1359

2 41,418

i 155
25
12
4
25
3
13
84
11
14
15
7
34
19
93
41
26
26
4 60
«28
63
18
6 45

31, 537
2 4, 270
2,417
226
3,186
1,001
6, 264
251
817
3,617
4, 763
1,492
679
2, 554
4, 631
2,954
877
800
2, 057
288
2, 905
1,644
1,261

*

Women

ID, 599

21,819

16,706
2 637
1,480
173
2,049
535
5,310
137
621
1,301
1, 769
1, 421
584
689
992
791
114
87
342
92
1,467
972
495

14,831
3,633
937
53
1,137
466
954
114
196
2,316
2,994
71
95
1, 865
8,639
2,163
763
713
1,715
196
1,438
672
766

i Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 industry group.
* 1 firm did not report number of men.
J1 plant making paper boxes and wooden boxes is entered in both industries.
4 Includes 8 laundries in hotels or restaurants.
5 21 were operated as departments of laundries.
•Includes 11 restaurants in stores.

Almost three-fifths (59 percent) of all workers reported were em­
ployed in Louisville. By industry, the proportion in Louisville va­
ried from 56 percent of the workers in laundries and dry-cleaning
establishments, 58 percent of those in factories, and 60 percent of
those in stores, to 72 percent of those in hotels and restaurants. All
the workers reported in the paper-box and drug and chemical indus­
tries, and more than 70 percent of those in the furniture, food, metal,
2The places visited are as follows: Bardstown, Bellevue, Benton Bowling Green, Cov­
ington, Dayton, Elizabethtown, Frankfort. Fulton, Grahamton, Henderson. Hickman, Hop­
kinsville, Irvine, l.awrenceburg, Lebanon, Lexington, Louisville, Madisonville, Mayfield,
Maysville, Middlesbormigli, Mount Sterling, Murray, Newport, Owensboro, Paducah,
Princeton, Ravenna, Richmond, Shelbyville, Somerset, and Winchester. The size of the
places ranges from a population of under 1,000 to one of over 300,000 ; 6 had under
0,500, 8 had 2,500 and under 5,000, 8 had 5,000 and under 10,000, 6 had 10,000 and
under 25,000, and 5 had more than 25,000.




INTRODUCTION

3

tobacco, and printing and publishing industries were in Louisville.
In all other manufacturing industries the majority of the workers
were in other cities.
Size of establishment.
Laundries, dry cleaners, and hotels and restaurants generally were
small establishments, and very few of those reported employed as
many as 100 workers; only 3 laundries, 4 hotels, and 2 independent
restaurants employed 100 or more workers, and no dry-cleaning plant
had so many as 40. Nearly two-thirds of the dry cleaners employed
fewer than 10 workers, two-thirds of all restaurants employed fewer
than 25, and well over half of the laundries had fewer than 30.
Ready-to-wear stores and the limited-price group generally were
small establishments, as over three-fifths of the former and nearly
half of the latter employed less than 25 workers. However, 2 readyto-wear shops and 1 in the limited-price group employed as many as
100 persons. Department stores were much larger; one-seventh of
them had 100 or more workers, the largest employing over 700.
Nearly two-fifths, however, had fewer than 25.
Over two-fifths of the factories employed 100 or more workers—1
nearly 4,000 and 15 others over 500. Just over one-fourth had 50 and
less than 100 workers. Industries with establishments emploving 500
or more workers were the following: Clothing (three plants), tex­
tiles (three), tobacco (three), distilled liquors (two), metal products
(two), leather products (one), furniture (one), and the miscellaneous
group (one).
Hours of work.
The Kentucky law regulating the hours of work of women pro­
hibits their employment for more than 10 hours in any one day or
60 hours in any one week. Of the 43 States that regulate weekly hours
for women, by limiting either the number of hours that may be
worked in a week or the number that may be worked in a day, only 9
permit a workweek as long as 60 hours.
The scheduled hours of an establishment are the usual hours re­
quired of employees, day after day, by the management, deviations
from the schedule constituting overtime or undertime.
The scheduled or normal working hours, reported for 17,611 women,
varied considerably in the different industries, but for only a negli­
gible number of these women was the week as long as the 60 hours
permitted by law; in fact, for only 15 percent of them did the week
exceed 48 hours, and for 53 percent it was 40 hours or less. This was
particularly true of the manufacturing industries, where 60 percent
of the women were scheduled to work 40 hours, and less than 10 per­
cent were scheduled to work as long as 48 hours. In stores the most
common scheduled hours were 45 and less than 48; by type of store
the proportion on such a schedule varied from 62 percent in the lim­
ited-price group to 78 percent in department stores and 80 percent
in the ready-to-wear shops. In each of the other industry groups,
except store restaurants, the prevailing schedule of hours was 48
or more, though in independent laundries and in dry-cleaning estab­
lishments over a third of the women had a week of over 44 and under
48 hours. In store restaurants—generally serving only one or two
66138°—38----- 2




4

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1037

.

meals—65 percent of the women were on a schedule of 40 hours or
less.
For a considerable number of the women, the actual hours worked
were much shorter than the scheduled hours. As shown in the sum­
mary following, only in dry cleaning did as many as half the women
work 48 hours or more in the week reported, though in stores the large
majority worked as long as 44 but under 48 hours. In laundries about
equal proportions of women worked less than 40 hours and 48 hours or
more, the proportion being just over three-tenths in each case. Ap­
proximately half the women in the factories surveyed worked under
40 hours, and over three-tenths worked 40 and under 44. The manu­
facturing industries in which 50 percent or more of the women worked
less than 40 hours were wooden boxes and baskets, paper boxes,
textiles, and distilled liquors. Over half of those in the tobacco
industry worked 40 hours.

Industry group *

Percent of women who worked—
Number
of women
reported Under 40 40, under 44, under 48 hours
44 hours 48 hours and over
hours

Total__________________ _____ —..............

14, 607

39.8

24.0

21.7

14.4

Stores (excluding part-time workers)-------------------Department---------- ----------------------------------Ready-to-wear— -----------------------------------Limited-price or variety-------------------------------

10, 293
2, 636
1, 642
629
365
1,509
169

a 49.8
7.4
6.9
9.7
5.2
8 30. 7
18.9

3 31. 0
2. 1
2.0
1.7
3.3
16.3
9.5

9.5
4 70.0
73. 6
69. 9
54.2
21.4
17.2

9.7
20.5
17.5
18.8
5 37. 3
^31.5
8 54.4

Dry cleaners----- ----------- -------------------------------- -

i In hotels and restaurants the variety of shifts made the figures noncomparable.
* 30.8 percent worked under 35 hours.
3 24.5 percent worked 40 hours.
4 33.8 percent worked 45 and under 46 hours, 33.8 percent worked 46 and under 48.
8 22.2 percent worked 48 hours.
8 14.8 percent worked under 35 hours.
' 23.0 percent worked 50 hours and over.
*37.9 percent worked 50 hours and over, 10.7 percent worked over 55 to 70.

Week’s earnings.
Average week’s earnings were not high. They ranged from $8 or
$9 in hotels and restaurants, where wage supplements are common,
to $14.40 in ready-to-wear stores, the best-paying of all the groups.
When it is realized that the form of average used in this study—the
median—represents the midpoint, with half the amounts falling be­
low it, the general level of Kentucky wages cannot be considered
encouraging. The women in ready-to-wear stores, 32 percent of
whom earned at least $16 and 16 percent at least $20, had the most
favorable earnings. Factories, dry cleaners, and department stores
followed, with respectively 27 percent, 24 percent, and 22 percent at
$16 and over. Only 6 percent of the women in limited-price stores
and only 1 percent of those in laundries had earnings of $16 or more.
Considering all manufacturing industries together, there was very
little concentration of earnings; 27 percent, however, had earnings
of $14 and under $17. As many as three-tenths earned less than $10.
In the metal and tobacco industries more than half the women earned
at least $16, and in distilled liquors, drugs and chemicals, furniture,
and printing and publishing the majority earned $14 and over.



INTRODUCTION

5

Low-wage industries were wooden box and basket making, where
more than half the women earned less than $10, and food, clothing
(chiefly cotton garments), and textiles, where half the women or
more received less than $12.
In laundries nearly nine-tenths (86 percent) of the women received
less than $12, over three-tenths (32 percent) less than $8. Over twofifths (42 percent) in dry-cleaning plants were paid less than $12.
In hotels and restaurants, where tips and wage supplements in the
form of meals are customary, the large majority of the women had
cash earnings below. $12. Almost three-fourths in hotels and just
over two-thirds in independent restaurants had cash earnings of
less than $10.
.
earnings of the women reported are shown by industry group
in the table following.
Table 2.

Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women, by industry group
Week’s earnings

Industry group

Factories __
Stores (exclusive of
part-time workers)___
Department -.
Ready-to-wear. ..
Limited-price or
variety
Laundries ________
Dry cleaners________
Hotels2__
_
Independent restau­
rants 2.. ____
Store restaurants 2
]

3
i
*

Hourly earnings

Percent of women who
earned—

Num­ Aver­
ber of age
wom­ earn­ Un­
ings 1 der
en
$8
11,985 $13. 00

Un­
der
$12

Un­
der
$16

$16
and
over

Num­
ber of
wom­
en

Percent of women who
earned—
Aver­
age
e rn40
i n us 1 Un­ Un­ Un­
(cents) der der der cents
20
30
and
40
cents cents cents over

19.2

41.7

72.5

27.5 10, 293

35.7

6.8

27.2

63.6

36.4

2,667
1,671
631

13. 60
13.70
14.40

3.2
2.8
3.6

20.2
17.9
13.6

77.9
77.9
68.5

22.1
22.1
31.5

2,636
1,642
629

29.8
30.0
31.2

5. 4
3.1
1.9

52. 1
50.6
34.8

87.8
89.3
78.1

12.2
10.7
21.9

365
1, 715
196
3 672

12. 40
9. 10
12. 65
8.20

4.1
32.1
10.3
46.6

42.1
86.2
41.9
83.8

94.0
99. 0
76. 5
(*)

6.0
1.0
23.5
(4)

365
1,509
169
(s)

26.4
20.8
27.6

21.6
28.2
7.7

88.1
94.4
61.6

97.8
99.7
94.1

2.2
.3
5.9

621
145

8. 65
9.15

42.4
42.8

78.4
76.6

(<)
(<)

(4)
(4)

(4)
(s)

JJ*®’“edian or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.
kase<* on ca\jk
excluding tips and allowance for lodging or meals,
women employed m restaurant departments of hotels.
Not obtainable.
Hourly earnings not computed for women in hotels and restaurants.

Hourly earnings.
It is apparent from the accompanying table that the highest hourly
earnings were m factories, followed by ready-to-wear stores and de­
partment stores, each with average earnings of at least 30 cents. The
lowest earnings were in laundries, where the average was only 20.8
cents.
The two largest groups in factories, together comprising 58 percent
of the women, are shown by unpublished figures to have earned 35
cents and over; in department stores and ready-to-wear stores, 68 and
62 percent, respectively, earned 25 and under 35 cents; and in limitedprice stores 51 percent earned 25 and under 30 cents. Well over threefourths (78 percent) of the women in laundries earned less than 25
cents an hour. Hourly earnings in hotels and restaurants were not
available.




6

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

SUMMARY OF CHIEF FINDINGS
Date of survey: Fall of 1937.
Scope of survey.
Establishments visited in 33 cities and towns-----------------------------359
Number of women they employed-------------------------------------------- 21, 819
68 percent of the women were in factories.
17 percent were in stores.
8 percent were in laundries.
7 percent were in hotels and restaurants.
1 percent were in dry cleaners.
FACTORIES
(Pay-roll data for 11,985 women)
Hours.
Scheduled hours of work were chiefly 8 a day and 40 or less a week. Not
far from three-fifths of the women had a 5-day week.
In the pay-roll week recorded, 74 percent of the women worked 40 hours or
less.
Earnings.
Average week’s earnings, all industries combined, were $13.
Averages ranged from $8 and under $9 in hosiery, in wooden boxes and
baskets, and in the miscellaneous clothing group, to $16 and under $17 in
metal products and in cigars and cigarettes.
Almost three-fourths of the women earned less than $16; more than twofifths earned less than $12. Only 5 percent earned $20 or more.
Average hourly earnings were 36 cents. Averages ranged from 24 cents in
wooden boxes and baskets to 46 cents in men’s suits and overcoats.
Average year’s earnings, obtained for 739 women, were $675.
RETAIL STORES
(Pay-roll data for 2,667 women)
Hours.
Scheduled hours of work were chiefly 7% a day and 45 and under 48 a
week.
Earnings.
Average week’s earnings, all types of store, were $13.60.
Averages were $14.40 in ready-to-wear stores, $13.70 in department stores,
and $12.40 in the limited-price group.
Almost four-fifths of the women earned less than $16; one-fifth earned less
than $12. Only 9 percent earned $20 or more.
Hourly earnings of almost two-thirds of the women were 25 and under 35
cents, much the larger part being 25 and under 30.
COMMERCIAL LAUNDRIES AND DRY CLEANERS
(Pay-roll data for 1,822 women)
Hours.
Scheduled hours of work in laundries and dry cleaners were chiefly over 44
but under 54.
In the pay-roll week recorded, 23 percent of the women in laundries and 38
percent of those in dry cleaners worked 50 hours or more. In dry clean­
ers, 7 percent worked at least 60 hours.
Earnings.
Average week’s earnings were $9.05 in laundries and $12.65 in dry cleaners.
In laundries 87 percent of the women earned less than $12; in dry cleaners,
28 percent earned $15 and over.
Hourly earnings of 77 percent of the women in laundries were below 25
cents; for only 6 percent of the women were they 30 cents or more. In
dry cleaners, 39 percent of the women earned at least 30 cents an hour, and
15 percent earned 35 cents or more.
Year’s earnings of 137 women in laundries averaged $513.



INTRODUCTION

HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS
(Pay-roll data for 1,438 women)

7

Hours.
Scheduled hours of work were chiefly these: Over 40 and under 48- 48h!!f
48 ,’'lt„undei' 56. Daily hours on duty were chiefly 9 or less’
but the spread from beginning to end of day was long. In hotels 63
percent and m independent restaurants 23 percent had a 7-day week.
Earnings.
Average week’s earnings in cash were $S.20 in hotels, $8.65 in independent
restaurants, and $9.15 in store restaurants
One or more meals daily were given to 44 percent of the women in hotels
(almost exclusively the dining-room and kitchen workers), to 75 percent
restaurants
restaurants’ and t0 82 Percent of those in independent




FACTORIES
Introduction.
Kentucky occupies a middle position among States in the field of
manufacturing. According to the 1935 Census of Manufactures it
ranks twenty-second in value of manufactured products, twenty-fifth
in amount of wages paid, and twenty-sixth in number of wage earners.
In two industries—the manufacture of tobacco products and the pro­
duction of distilled liquors—it ranks among the most important States
in the country. In the fiscal year 1937 Kentucky produced more
than one-third of the distilled liquors made in the United States.
In 1936 it ranked third among the States in the production of smoking
and chewing tobacco and snuff, and also in the production of ciga­
rettes, though the production of the last named is far below that of
the two leading States. Both the tobacco and distilled-liquor indus­
tries are important sources of employment to women wage earners
in the State.
The Census of Manufactures for 1935 reported 1,637 establish­
ments in Kentucky, with an average for the year of 67,456 wage
earners, but the sex of the workers was not reported and no census
since that of 1929 shows the number of women.
Louisville is the chief manufacturing center, having a little more
than one-third of the establishments in the State and almost one-half
of the wage earners.
.
Outside of Louisville and Jefferson County, the only concentration
of factories by type of product is in the manufacture of hosiery and
of distilled liquors. A number of hosiery mills are situated in Padu­
cah and a few small towns in the extreme west, and distilleries are
found in a group of counties in the central part of the State. Many
of the distilleries have bottling rooms, and the greater proportion of
the wage earners in these bottling departments are women.
Exclusive of Louisville, Kentucky has only 12 cities with a popula­
tion of 10,000 and over. Some manufacturing is done in nearly all
these, and important plants are scattered here and there in smaller
towns throughout the State.
_
_
The Women’s Bureau survey in the fall of 1937, in which only
plants employing at least 5 women were included, covered 155 estab­
lishments with 31,537 wage earners, of whom 14,831 were women.
The women were fairly equally divided between plants in Louisville
and plants in other places in the State. With the exception of three
establishments with such large numbers of employees that the data
copied were limited to every second, third, or fourth woman on the
pay roll, earnings were obtained for all women employees except the
supervisory, office, and maintenance staffs.
The effort was made to secure sample data from every womanemploying industry in the State and from all sections of the State.
Besides Louisville, the places in which data were obtained were
S



FACTORIES

9

Bardstown, Bellevue, Benton, Bowling Green, Covington, Dayton,
Elizabethtown, Frankfort, Fulton, Grahamton, Henderson, Hick­
man, Hopkinsville, Irvine, Lawrenceburg, Lebanon. Lexington, May­
field, Maysville, Middlesborough, Mount Sterling, Murray, Newport,
Owensboro, Paducah, Princeton, Richmond, Shelbyville, and Win­
chester. Table 3 gives for each industry surveyed the number of
plants and employees covered.
Table 3.—Number of establishments visited and number of men and women they

employed, by industry—Factories
Number of employees
Industry

All manufacturing

of establishments

Women
Total

Men
Number

Per­
cent

White

Negro

155

31,537

16,706

i 14,831

100.0

14,307

524

Clothing. ................................................... .

25

2 4, 270

*637

3,633

24.5

3,490

143

Men’s suits and overcoats
Men’s and women's cotton garments.
Men’s furnishings______ _________
Other clothing 3............................. ......

0
10
0
3

*959
2,599
351
361

*228
250
95
64

731
2,349
256
297

4.9
15.8
1.7
2.0

731
2, 263
199
297

86
57

Distilled liquors * ....... .......................
Drugs and chemicals. ................... ............

12
4

2,417
226

1,480
173

937
53

6.3
.4

937
42

11

Food products

25

3,186

2,049

1,137

7.7

1,056

81

Bakery products............................... .
Candy 1
Meat-packing products
Other food «

6
4
10
5

591
531
1, 279
785

325
222
1,001
501

266
309
278
284

1.8
2.1
1.9
1.9

265
309
198
284

80

Leather products___________________
Metal products____________________
Paper boxes__________ ____ _________
Printing and publishing___ __________

3
13
74
11

1,001
6, 264
251
817

535
5,310
137
621

466
954
114
196

3.1
6.4
.8
1.3

466
954
113
196

1

Textiles........... ....................... ....................

14

3, 617

1, 301

2,316

15.6'

2,316

Hosiery......... ............. .........................
Other textiles 1................ .....................

5
9

1,464
2, 153

425
876

1,039
1,277

7.0
8.6

1, 039
1, 277

Tobacco and its products..........................

15

4, 763

1,769

2,994

20.2

2, 707

287

Cigars and cigarettes...........................
Other tobacco ».................... ............ .

4
11

3, 460
1, 303

1,152
617

2,308
686

15.6
4.6

2,308
399

287

Wood and metal furniture 10
Wooden boxes and baskets________
Other manufacturing u_______ ________

7
U
19

1,492
679
2, 554

1, 421
584
689

71
95
1, 865

.5
.6
12.6

71
95
1,864

i

1

1 Wage data were obtained for 11,985 women.
* 1 firm did not report number of men.
* Riding apparel and boys' clothing.
J Includes 1 plant making wine, but women do bottling as in other places.
1 Includes 1 establishment making conserved fruits, and so forth
* Dairy products, macaroni, pickles, and so forth.
! 1 Plant making paper boxes and wooden boxes is entered in both industries.
I X,arns’ thread> and cordage, webbing, blankets, and special weaves.
T!jlng«Bn<*- smoklnS tobacco. Includes 2 plants doing tobacco rehandling.
ii ®e®ld®s.‘urn!ture some plants make carpet sweepers, kiddie cars, organs, screens, blinds, and so forth.
Industries with too few establishments for separate classes. Includes bags, brooms and mops, caskets
and robes, electric lamps and tubes, ice-cream cones, machinists’ rags, mattresses and bedding, mirrors,
pottery, tents and awnings, tinsel and trimmings, and others.

HOURS
The Kentucky law governing the length of the working day and
week for women was passed in 1912. It provides that women shall



10

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1987

not be employed for longer than 10 hours in 1 day or 60 hours in 1
week.
Scheduled hours.
The data secured in the recent survey indicate that industry has
been more progressive in limiting hours of work for women than has
the legislature. Not far from three-fifths of the manufacturing estab­
lishments were on a 5-day week. Three-fourths (76 percent) of the
women employees had a scheduled workweek of 40 hours or less, 60
percent being on a schedule of exactly 40 hours. Only 6 percent
(732 women) were employed in plants with a schedule of 50 hours
or more, and no plant had a schedule of 60 hours.
An 8-hour day was the schedule in the largest number of factories;
more than three-fifths of the women had such hours. Slightly over
one-fifth had a schedule shorter than 8 hours. Six estabiislunents,
employing a total of only 191 women, reported a 10-hour day, and
all these had either a 5-day week or a short day on Saturday.
Hours worked.
The percentage of women actually working 40 hours or less was
almost identical with the percentage having such schedules—re­
spectively 74 percent and 76 percent. But when the figures are broken
down into groups of those working exactly 40 hours and those work­
ing a shorter time, this difference appears: Whereas scheduled hours
show almost four times as many women at 40 hours as at below 40,
the hours worked show only half as many women at 40 hours as at
below 40. Absence from work for personal reasons may have been
responsible for much of this short time.
About 10 percent of the women had worked 48 hours or over. Close
to one-half of this group were in some branch of the clothing industry,
and just over one-fifth were in food plants, candy accounting for the
greatest number. Candy was the only industry with any considerable
number of women working over 55 hours.
EARNINGS
Average week’s earnings.
Data on week’s earnings were secured for 11,985 women, or 81
percent of those employed in the plants studied. The number of hours
worked during the week was reported for 10,293 women. The aver­
age week’s earnings1 of all women in manufacturing, regardless of
number of hours worked, were $13.
Average week’s earnings in Louisville plants were $14.60, but in
the group of other cities and towns they were only $11.20. Short
time or undertime was more prevalent in establishments outside Louis­
ville, more than three-fifths of the women in other places in contrast
to well under two-fifths in Louisville having worked less than 40
hours. Further, in a number of industries hourly earnings were very
much lower in the smaller places, candy manufacturing being a
notable exception to this.
The miscellaneous clothing group, hosiery, and wooden boxes and
baskets had the lowest average week’s earnings, all being less than $9.
1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half
shown.




above the amount

factories

11

SLrdll,ct8 ($16.50), cigars and cigarettes ($16.40), furniture
(iplo.bO), and mens suits and overcoats ($15) are the only industries
in which average week’s earnings were $15 and more.
The exceedingly low average of $4.75 was found for the tobacco
industry m the group of places other than Louisville. This was
brought about by the inclusion in this group of two rehandling plants,
inclusive of these plants, the average is $8.25. It was reported that
many women m the rehandling plants worked very irregularly but
as time records were not furnished it cannot be stated whether the
low earnings were due to the rates of pay or to short time
If the rehandling plants be omitted, practically all the women were
employed in the chewing- and smoking-tobacco branch of the industiy, m which wages in the plants outside of Louisville compare most
unfavorably with those of Louisville. Though the figure for this
branch of the industry in Louisville cannot be shown separately be­
cause only two plants were surveyed there, it may be stated that the
average weeks earnings of women in these plants were more than
double the average for plants in other places in the State.
Distribution of week’s earnings.
The distribution of week’s earnings may be judged from the cumu­
lative percents as shown by industry in table 4 on page 13.
percent of the women employed in factories had earned less
than $10 m the week studied; 10 percent had earned less than $5
r rom more detailed figures than appear in table 4, it is apparent that
there was no concentration at any dollar interval, the highest propor­
tion at one point being only 12 percent at $16 and under $17 Six­
teen percent of the women earned $17 or more. The remaining 43 per­
cent had earnings in the groups $10 and under $16, the maximum
proportion in any single interval being 9 percent, at $14 and under $15.
.Nearly three-fifths of the women in wooden box and basket
plants earned under $10. The two industry groups, clothing and
textiles, that account for almost one-lialf of the women in the study
had the next highest percentages of women earning under $10 a'
week—39 percent in textiles and 38 percent in clothing. In the
mens suit and overcoat branch of the clothing industry however
only 11 percent of the women earned less than $10.
In the highest class of weekly earnings, $16 and over, the tobacco
group ranked best with 57 percent of its women employees so paid
followed closely by metal products with 56 percent; furniture ranked
third with 44 percent, and printing and publishing and distilled
liquors followed, each with 41 percent. Among the industries with
very small percentages of women earning $16 or more, wooden boxes
and baskets ranked lowest, with only 4 percent of its women so paid
Food products, drugs and chemicals, and textiles followed, witli
respectively 12, 13, and 14 percent of their women employees earn­
ing $16 or more a week.
Extent of piece work.
For all but five women it was reported whether they were paid
at piece rates or at time rates. Forty-five percent of them were paid
according to the time worked, very large numbers having an hourly
66138°—38----- 3




12

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

rate. Tlie others were paid straight piece rates (49 percent of the
women) or were under systems combining piece and time, paying
piece rates to a group, or other plan (6 percent).
In the various industry groups the proportions of women paid at
piece rates were as follows: Leather products, 85 percent; clothing,
80 percent; wooden boxes and baskets, 55 percent; metal products,
52 percent; paper boxes, 49 percent; textiles, 48 percent. There
were no piece workers in distilled liquors, in printing and publishing,
nor in the small group in drugs and chemicals; only one-third of
the women in the tobacco industry, a little over one-fifth of those
in food products, and only one-tenth of those in the furniture in­
dustry were on straight piece rates.
Learners.
Just over 300 learners were found on the pay rolls of 25 manu­
facturing establishments. They constituted only 2y2 percent of all
women with earnings reported.
_
Learners have not been excluded from the wage tables. In spite
of the fact that their average hourly earnings were not much more
than half the average of more experienced women—19.1 cents for
learners and 35.9 cents for other women—their number was so small
that their inclusion reduced the average hourly earnings of all
women by only one-fifth of a cent and the average weekly earnings
by only 15 cents.
Week’s earnings and hours worked.
The average week’s earnings of $8.80 for the women who had
worked less than 35 hours in the pay-roll week taken (31 percent of
the total) emphasize the hardship of short hours on the woman
wage earner unless compensated at higher rates. In only three in­
dustries with 50 or more women at these hours—metal, tobacco, and
leather products-—did women working less than 35 hours average
more than the figure for all manufacturing.
The average for women working 35 but under 40 hours was $14.70.
In establishments making tobacco products, metal products, and
distilled liquors, the averages for a workweek of this length were
respectively $16.05, $16.20, and $16.55. For women working 40 hours
or more in the week, the average earnings for all manufacturing
were $14.85. In the five industries with averages shown that exceed
this figure, the amounts were $15.70 for printing and publishing,
$16.55 for the tobacco group, $16.65 for wood and metal furniture,
$18.05 for distilled liquors, and $18.35 for metal products.
Average hourly earnings.
Hourly earnings—computed separately for each woman by divid­
ing her week’s earnings by the number of hours she worked—are
the key to basic pay rates and indicate the possibilities in week’s
earnings if employment is stabilized. Data on this item were se­
cured for 10,293 women in 132 establishments. For all women in
manufacturing, the average hourly earnings were 36 cents. They
ranged from 24 cents in wooden boxes and baskets to 46 cents in
men’s suits and overcoats. For Louisville the average was 37 cents,
and for other cities and towns it was 34 cents.



Table 4.—Week's

earnings and hourly earnings of women—Factories
Week’s earnings

Average earnings 1
Industry

All
women

All manufacturing..... ................ .........

11,985

$13,00

5,166

Clothing.............. ......................„........... ........ .
Men suits and overcoats
Men and women’s cotton garments
Men’s furnishings__________________ _
Other clothing........... ...............................

3,370
731
2,086
256
297

11.50
15.00
10.85
11.10
8.45

1,400
93
1,147
137
23

Distilled liquors__________________ ____
Drugs and chemicals

937
53

14.30
14.45

Food products..................... ........................ .
Bakery products___________________
Candy
Meat packing products_____ _____ ___
Other food........... ................................. .

1,137
266
309
278
284

12.05
12. 95
11.80
13.00
10. 75

Leather products
Metal-products_____________ _________ _
Paper boxes....... ............................ ..................
Printing and publishing..... ............................

466
954
111
196

13. 65
16.50
13.80
14.95

Textiles. .............. ........ .....................................
Hosiery_______________________ ____
Other textiles..........................................

2,316
1,036
1,277

11. 60
8.85
12.65

732
230
502

Tobacco and its products..............................
Cigars and cigarettes_____ __________
Other tobacco___ ___ _______________

1,659
973
686

16.15
16.40
9.60

Wood and metal furniture..............................
Wooden boxes and baskets............... .............
Other manufacturings............................. ......

71
95
617

15. 60
8. 95
13. 75

Women who
worked 40 hours
or more
Num­
Earn­
ber
ings

Total Average
num­
earn­
ber
of
ings 1
Under
Under $16 and
(cents)
25
women
$16
over
cents

Under Under 45 cents
35
and
45
cents
cents
over

Under
$10

Under
$12

$14,85

29.8

41.7

57.6

72.5

27.5

10,293

35.7

15.3

42.1

85.9

14.1

12.90

0
0
0
0

38.2
10.8
43.7
40.2
65.3

53.9
24.8
58.8
64.5
82.8

70.9
40.6
78.1
75.8
90.6

82.7
58.9
89.7
83.6
96.6

17.3
43.1
10.3
16.4
3.4

2,700
557
1,909
208
26

30.6
46.2
28.5
31.4

23.6
2.7
28.7
27.9

64.1
13.3
77.8
69.7

86.2
43.8
97.1
97.1

13.8
56.2
2.9
2.9

104
36

18.05

32.0
5.7

38.1
30.2

48.0
34.0

59.3
86.8

40.7
13.2

934
42

12.5

84.7

711
209
187
147
168
255

0
0
0
0

13.60

33.9
20.7
31.1
39.2
44.4

49.5
38.7
52.1
44.6
61.6

70.9
66.2
73.5
57.9
85.2

88.4
93.2
86.7
80.6
93.3

11.6
6.8
13.3
19.4
6.7

14. 80
18.35

17.1
5.3
19.3
13.2

28.7
10.8
36.9
19.4

54.4
23.4
51.8
38.3

69.7
43.6
69.3
59.2

14.55

38.8
57.3
23.9

53.8
65.6
44.2

67.3
76.6
59.8

755
529
226

16. 55

0
0

24.8
6.3
51.3

29.2
9.6
57.3

54
40
338

16. 65
(3)
14.20

12.7
56.8
7.2

29.6
72.6
16.6

558
30
153

0

0

15. 70

0
0

1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.




Percent of total women who
earned—

Percent of total women who eamed-

Under
$14

0

43.5

0

1.4

0

0

15.3

0

0 ■

0

1,053
258
309
234
252

30.6
32.6
29.3
32.6
27.5

27.0
27.1
42.1
.4
32.9

66.8
55.4
62.8
59.0
90.5

97.8
99.2
93.5
99.6
10.0

2.2
.8
6.5
.4

30.3
56.4
30.7
40.8

466
842
78
191

35.5
43.5
41.8
35.8

11.6
1.3
8.4

47.7
12.7
26.9
38.2

81.3
57.1
83.3
81.7

18.7
42.9
16.7
18.3

86.5
84.6
88.3

13.5
15.4
11.7

2,083
845
1, 238

35.5
26.9
35.8

18.6
43.3
1.7

37.6
72.2
13.9

90.9
85.1
94.8

9.1
14.9
5.2

37.0
16.8
65.9

43.5
22.6
73.2

56.5
77.4
26.8

1,175
770
405

40.9
41.0
38.2

6.6
1.3
16.5

14.5
3.6
35.1

85.0
95.6
64.9

15.0
4.4
35.1

39.4
88.4
55.2

56.3
95.8
81.4

43.7
4.2
18.6

69
80
580

35.6
24.4
35.4

14.5
68.8
3.7

46.4
96. 4
45.8

78.3
97.5
94.0

21.7
2.5
6.0

2 Not obtainable.

0

3 Not computed; base less than 50.

0

FACTORIES

Total
num­
ber of
women

Hourly earnings

CO

14

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

Excluding the group averages for clothing, food, textiles, and
tobacco, 11 of the 19 figures shown for the State as a whole are be­
low that for all industries. The highest hourly earnings found
were in men’s suits and overcoats, distilled liquors and metal prod­
ucts (alike), paper boxes, and cigars and cigarettes, all averaging
above 40 cents an hour, and together accounting for more than threetenths of all the women.
Unpublished figures show that Louisville establishments making
metal products, distilled liquors, tobacco products, and paper boxes,
and employing two-fifths of the women studied in that city, had
average hourly earnings above 40 cents. In the group of other
places, men’s suits and overcoats and distilled liquors ranked the
highest.
Distribution of hourly earnings.
Other unpublished figures show that the range of hourly earnings
was from less than 15 cents to more than 50 cents. Forty-four per­
cent of the women, practically equally divided at the midpoint group,
had hourly earnings of 35 and under 45 cents. The next largest
concentration, 27 percent, had earnings of 25 and under 35 cents,
with much less than half of this group below 30 cents.
For the various industries, 86 percent of the women in distilled
liquors, 77 percent of those in the tobacco group, and 70 percent of
those in metal products earned 40 cents or more an hour. Paper
boxes, with 57 percent of the women at such earnings but with only
a small total, ranked fourth. The heaviest concentration in the tex­
tile industry (43 percent of the women) was at 35 and under 40
cents.
Half the women in the food-industry group earned 30 but under
40 cents; two-fifths of those in clothing earned 25 and under 35
cents. More detailed figures show that in the men’s suit and over­
coat branch of the latter group, three-fourths of the women earned
40 cents an hour or more, nearly two-fifths receiving 50 cents or more.
Year’s earnings.
Data on earnings throughout the year were requested for 10 per­
cent of the women employees in each establishment visited. In many
plants, however, such records were not available, and in plants em­
ploying large numbers of women much less than 10 percent of the
year’s records wTere copied. For these reasons, the total number for
whom such data were obtained (739) is very much less than one-tenth
of the women included in the study, and represents only 115 of the
155 establishments scheduled.
For this group of women the year’s earnings averaged $675. The
figure undoubtedly would have been higher had not 79 plants lost
time on account of the flood. All but 10 of these lost more than a
week’s time, and while only 8 reported being closed for 4 weeks or
more, 2 actually had been closed for 6 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Time lost from other causes also contributed to reduce year’s earn­
ings. Information on the number of weeks worked was secured for
561 of the women, and more than one-fifth of them had lost over
4 weeks’ time during the year. Four percent had lost as much as 10
weeks.



FACTORIES

15

Selecting as a convenient dividing line $700, a figure which repre­
sents approximately $13.50 a week on a 52-week basis, 56 percent
o± the women were found to have earned less than this amount.
Years earnings below $300 were found for less than 2 percent of
the women; 13 percent earned $300 and under $500, and 42 percent—
moie than two-fifths of the whole group—earned $500 and under
''
contrast to these figures it is encouraging to find that over
eainh^Qm
} eamed $7°° but less than $900- The number
S$90° and
represents only 9 percent of the total.
least $1*500 W°men had earninSs of S1,000 or more, 2 receiving at
The industries in which half or more of the women earned $700
and above were paper boxes, tobacco products, furniture, men's suits
and overcoats, metal products, and printing and publishing.
NEGRO WOMEN
No separate figures for Negro women have been presented in this
524O190q
number f°und m the establishments surveyed was only

;ztXzi

Exclusive of the tobacco-rehandling
plants, the chief
Si”
on toba“° reh“',,i"g
315 groups
^ were
(8 women making prepared chewing and smoking tobacco, 80 in the
poultry-aressmg departments of meat-packing plants, and 143 in
establishments making clothing. Four establishments employed Neoccupatkms°n y’
°theiS empIoyed NeSroes exclusively i/certain
None of the data secured indicate any difference in rates paid to
Negro and white women working in the same occupation in the same
establishment, but the figures serve to emphasize the lack of opporiXirios of
gl'° W01”e" “ ^ manufMt™S




RETAIL STORES
Introduction.
Employment in retail stores is one of the most significant fields
of women’s work, both in numbers employed and in general geo­
graphic extent. In the small nonindustrial community it is one of
the few local work opportunities for women. The Census of Business
for 1935 showed for Kentucky 64 department stores with an average
for the year of 3,633 regular and part-time employees, 208 women’s
ready-to-wear stores with 1,110 employees, and 195 limited-price or
variety stores with 2,221 employees. In the recent survey by the
Women’s Bureau, 93 stores with 3,639 women employees were covered.
This group included 41 department stores with 2,163 women, 26 readyto-wear stores with 763 women, and 26 limited-price or variety stores
with 713 women. Women workers are preponderantly in the majority
in these three types of stores, and in the Kentucky survey they com­
prised almost three-fourths of the employees in department stores
and almost nine-tenths of those in ready-to-wear and the limitedprice group of stores.
Table 5 —Number

of establishments visited and number of men and women
they employed—Retail stores

Type of store

Total......................... Limited-price or variety----

Estab­
lish­
ments
93
41
26
26

Men Women

992
791
114
87

Other places in State

Louisville

State

3,639
2,163
763
713

Estab­
lish­
ments
28
10
13
5

Men Women

Estab­
lish­
ments

Men

Women

616

2,164

65

376

1,475

501
81
34

1,297
692
275

31
13
21

290
33
53

866
1/1
438

The stores surveyed were not large; only 9 of the 93 had as many
as 100 employees (1 had 700), and 44 had fewer than 25.
Stores included in the survey are representative of all parts of the
State. Of the 93 establishments, 28 were in Louisville and 65 were
in 18 other shopping centers. The list of the other places follows:
Bowling Green, Covington, Frankfort, Henderson, Hopkinsville.
Lebanon, Lexington, Madisonville, Mayfield, Maysville, Middlesborough, Mount Sterling, Newport, Owensboro, Paducah, Richmond,
Somerset, and Winchester.
The data concerning women’s wages and hours have been classed
in two groups: Those for regular workers employed on a full-time
weekly schedule, and those for part-time or extra workers employed
to work at the busiest hours, or during special sales, on Saturdays, or
as substitutes for regulars. In department stores 23 percent of the
women, and in ready-to-wear stores 17 percent, were part-time work­

16



RETAIL STORES

17

ers. The limited-price group had the highest proportion of part-time
workers. Almost one-half (49 percent) of the women on the pay
rolls of this type of store had only part-time work, a large number
of them working only on Saturdays. The wage discussions in this
report refer to regular workers unless the part-time or irregular group
is specified.
Selling is, of course, the largest occupational field for women in
stores. In the limited-price or variety stores the sales force is the
only numerically important group, but in the department stores and
the larger of the ready-to-wear establishments the alteration force
and office force are significant proportions. In department stores
about 66 percent of the women, in ready-to-wear stores 58 percent,
and in the limited-price group about 91 percent, were engaged in
selling. In the department stores the office workers were about 21
percent. Alteration workers naturally were a larger group in the
ready-to-wear stores than elsewhere, remodeling of garments being a
necessary practice and engaging 19 percent of the workers.
Other employees, such as stockroom workers, elevator operators,
telephone operators, bundle and cash girls, and many others, com­
prised 8 percent of the regular employees in department stores and
11 percent of those in ready-to-wear stores. In all types of stores the
great majority of part-time or extra employees were saleswomen.
WOMEN REGULAR EMPLOYEES
Hours of work.
In Kentucky stores the week’s scheduled hours massed largely at
45 and under 48 hours, though in places other than Louisville there
were significant proportions at more than 48 hours. For the regular
staff, time lost usually may be attributed to personal reasons. The
summary following shows the scheduled weekly hours of women
regular employees in the State as a whole.
Percent of women whose scheduled hours were—
Type of store
Under 45 45, under 46, under 47, under
46
47
48
4.0
imited-price or variety___________

69.7

30.9
6.2
8.4

14.6
53.4

48
3.5
11.3
22.5

Over 48
14.2
15.7

This tabulation of hours shows that almost 80 percent of the women
in department stores had working hours of 45 and under 48. Readyto-wear stores had the shortest scheduled hours (under 46 for 70
percent of the women) and the limited-price group had the longest
(48 or more for 38 percent of the women). Unpublished figures
show that hours tended to be much shorter in Louisville than in
other cities and towns. Almost nine-tenths (87 percent) of the
women in ready-to-wear stores in Louisville were scheduled to work
45 and under 46 hours, and about 85 percent of the women in
Louisville department stores had weekly hours of less than 47. Uni­
formity of hours in the limited-price group in Louisville is evident



IS

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

from the fact that all the women reported had a schedule of 4? and
under 48 hours.
In the other places visited, the scheduled hours in stores were
decidedly long for present-day standards. Hours of 48 and over
were the schedule of 37 percent of the women in department stores,
58 percent of those in ready-to-wear stores, and 67 percent of those
in the limited-price group.
Daily working hours ranged from 7% to 9, with almost two-thirds
of the women on a 7y2-hour schedule. In Louisville no store in the
limited-price group had a schedule of more than 7y2 hours daily, and
less than 10 percent of the women in department and ready-to-wear
stores had daily hours as long as 8. In other places, however, more
than one-lialf of the women in ready-to-wear and limited-price stores
and one-third of those in department stores were scheduled to work
8 hours and more a day.
Week’s earnings.
The average earnings 1 of all the women regular employees included
in the survey of Kentucky stores were $13.60. From the standpoint
of type of store, the lowest wage level was that of the limited-price
group, the average being $12.40, and the highest was that of the
ready-to-wear group, $14.40. Department stores fell between, with
$13.70.
Average earnings in Louisville were 3 percent higher than those
for the State as a whole and 11 percent higher than those for other
places in the State.
Unpublished figures show that for the State as a whole there was a
concentration of earnings at two points—$12 and under $14 (37 per­
cent) and $14 and under $16 (21 percent). The proportion of women
with earnings of $20 and over was small, and only in Louisville were
as many as 10 percent earning this much. About one-sixth of the
women in stores outside of Louisville had earnings of less than $10.
Average week’s earnings and hours worked.
A tabulation of average earnings according to hours worked for
the regular employees wdio were paid for 44 and more hours of work
follows:
Average earnings of women who worked—
Type of store
44 hours

Department.................. .............................. .......................
Limited-price or variety-----

------- ----- - - ---------

$15. 90
(>)
(■)

45 or 45H
hours

46, under
48 hours

$13.70
14. 40
(0

$14. 45
14. 50
13. 35

48 hours
$13.80
15.80
9.95

• Not computed; base less than 50 women.

In Louisville the women earning less than 25 cents were few, but in
the other places they comprised one-third of the total. More than
1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount
shown.




RETAIL STORES

19

three-fifths of the women in Louisville earned at least 30 cents an
hour, but outside of the State’s chief city less than three-tenths had
such earnings.
A tabulation of week’s earnings and hourly earnings, by type of
store, follows:
Table 6.—Week’s

earnings ana hourly earnings of women—Retail stores
Week’s Earnings
Percent of women who earned—
Number Average
of women earnings i

Type of store

Total___ ____________
Department............ ........
Ready-to-wear_________
Limited-price or variety. _

_

Under
$10

Under
$12

Under
$14

Under
$16

2,667

$13.60

9.5

20.2

57.1

77.9

1,671
631
365

13.70
14.40
12. 40

6.6
6.5
27.9

17.9
13.6
42.1

54.9
47. 4
84.0

77 9

$16 and
over
22.1

94.0

6.0

Hourly Earnings
Percent of women who earned- Type of store

Total_______________
Department___ _____
Ready-to-wear_________ _
Limited-price or variety____

Number Average
>
of women earnings
(cents)

Under
20 cents

Under
25 cents

Under
30 cents

Under
35 cents

35 cents
and over

2,636

29.8

5.4

14.8

52.1

79.8

20.2

1,642
629
365

30.0
31.2
26.4

3.1
1.9
21.6

13.2
6.2
36.9

50.6
34.8
88.1

80.8
68. 4
95.3

19.2
4.7

The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.
2 9.4 percent at $20 and under $25, 6.8 percent at $25 and more.
[

Earnings in department stores.
Average week’s earnings for all women in department stores for
whom earnings were reported were $13.70; those for Louisville were
50 cents higher ($14.20) and those for other places almost a dollar
less ($12.75). The greatest concentration of the earnings in all occupa­
tions combined was in the groups $12 and under $16, where 60 per­
cent of the earnings fell. Among these 60 percent, the actual amounts
were $12.50 or $13.50 in more than one-third of the cases and were
$14 or $15 in more than one-fourth. For all occupations but office
work, the greatest concentration in any single dollar group was at $12
and under $13. The summary following gives the wage distribution
by occupation, for the State. It should be remembered that earnings
in Louisville tend to be somewhat higher and those in other cities
in the State considerably lower.
Week’s earnings
Number of women____
Average earnings

Total
1,671
$13. 70-

Sales
1,095
$13. 75

Alteration
102
$13.90

Office
344
$14.35

1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.




Other
130
$12. 50

20

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

Office and alteration women in department stores had slightly
higher earnings than the sales force, the average for alteration work­
ers being 15 cents higher and that for office workers 60 cents higher.
Only in the office group did as many as 10 percent of the women
earn $20 or more.
A correlation of hours worked and earnings shows that only 1
percent of the women in department stores who had earnings of $12
or more in the pay-roll week transcribed worked less than 45 hours;
10 percent worked more than 48 hours. Forty-nine women with
earnings of less than $10 worked at least 45 hours, 30 of them working
50 and more.
The highest average week’s wage ($15.90) was that of the group
working 44 hours. The women working 45 and 45% hours averaged
$13.75 and those working 46 and under 48 hours averaged $14.55.
The averages for the 48-hour and the 50-hour groups were respectively
$13.80 and $12.30.
.
Average hourly earnings for women employees in Kentucky de­
partment stores, irrespective of occupation, were 30 cents; for Louis­
ville they were 31 cents; and for the other places about 27 cents.
Variation in hourly earnings by occupation was slight, except for
the miscellaneous group “other.” The sales force averaged 29.9
cents, the alteration group 30.5 cents, and the office force 31.1 cents.
.Other workers—which, as before explained, included such jobs as
elevator operators, bundle and cash girls, and maintenance women—
averaged 26.6 cents. The concentration of hourly earnings was in
the groups of 25 and under 35 cents, which included more than twothirds of the women. The largest proportion at any 1-cent interval
among Louisville saleswomen was the 18 percent earning 29 and under
30 cents; in the other places it was the 14 percent earning 26 and
under 27 cents.
Earnings in ready-to-wear stores.
Nearly one-fourth of the women for whom earnings data were ob­
tained were employed in ready-to-wear stores, specializing chiefly in
women’s wear. Their average week’s earnings were $14.40, those of
saleswomen being $15.25 and those of alteration workers $13.60.
Saleswomen in Louisville had an average 90 cents higher than that
in other places of the State. The range of week’s earnings was from
less than $10 for 7 percent of the women to $35 and more for 2 per­
cent. Even in this type of store, where the wage level was highest,
more than two-thirds of the women had week’s earnings of under $16.
A correlation of earnings and hours worked shows that three-fifths
of the women worked 45 or 45i/2 hours and had average earnings of
$14.40.
Hourly earnings of saleswomen averaged 32.4 cents, those of alter­
ation workers 30.5 cents, and those of office workers 83.7 cents. Thus
more than half the workers averaged 30 cents or more an hour in
all occupations but the miscellaneous group “other.”
Earnings in limited-price or variety stores.
Earnings in the limited-price or variety stores were decidedly
lower than in the other types of stores. About 84 percent of the




RETAIL STORES

21

women in the limited-price group, compared to about 55 percent in
department stores, earned less than $14 a week.
There is marked variation in the earnings and hours between
Louisville and other places in the State. Average earnings were
$13.35 in Louisville and $10.60 in other places. In Louisville the
proportion of women receiving less than $10 was only about 7 per­
cent^ but in the other places it was 44 percent; in other words, in
Louisville only about 1 woman in 15, but in other places almost 7
in 15, received less than $10. Not only were the earnings less in
places other than Louisville, but the hours were longer.
Average hourly earnings in the limited-price group were 26.4 cents
for the State, 27.7 cents for Louisville, and 21.2 cents for other places.
In Louisville about 30 percent of the saleswomen received 27 and
under 28 cents an hour, but in other places 24 percent received 18 and
under 20 cents and 17.2 percent received less than 18 cents.
A correlation of earnings and hours shows that almost nine-tenths
of the women in Louisville worked 47y2 hours and had average
earnings of $13.50; only 3 women worked longer. In other places
the most representative group (almost two-fiftlis) worked 48 hours
and averaged $9.95.
WOMEN PART-TIME EMPLOYEES
Earnings and hours.
Almost one-half (49 percent) of the women in the limited-price
roup of stores, not far from one-fourth (23 percent) of those in
epartment stores, and a little more than one-sixth (17 percent)
of those in ready-to-wear stores were on a part-time basis, employed
to work at the busiest hours of the day, or on Saturdays, or for spe­
cial sales, or as substitutes for absentees.
A large proportion of these part-time workers were 1-day (prob­
ably Saturday) extras, but all types of store had some such em­
ployees who worked 40 or more hours in the week reported. About
60 percent of the part-time emplovees in readv-to-wear and the lim­
ited-price group, and about 40 percent of those in department stores,
worked 10 hours or less. In department stores one-third worked
30 hours or more.
Since the large majority of this group worked short hours, their
week’s earnings were very low. The average week’s earnings and
hourly earnings of part-time workers, by type of store, follow:

f

Average week’s earnings 1
Type of store
State

Department_________ _______________
Beady-to-wear _ __ __
Limited-price or variety____ __________

$4.45
2.80
2.30

Louis­
ville

Other
places
in State

$6.
2.8u
3.80

$2.55
1.85

Average hourly earnings 1
(cents)

State

27.9
27.8
25.0

Louis­
ville
29.5
28.0
25.5

i The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.
Not computed; base too small.

*




Other
places
in State
21.0
(!)
18.8

22

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

In general the average hourly earnings were somewhat lower than
those of regular employees. In the limited-price group, G3 percent
of the part-time women in places other than Louisville had average
hourly earnings of less than 20 cents. In such stores in Louisville,
91 percent of the women averaged 25 and under 26 cents. In de­
partment stores in Louisville 47 percent of the part-time workers
averaged 29 and under 31 cents. Since part-time workers and extras
are quite generally expected by their employers to be available on
short call for emergency needs, it seems only fair that the short and
uncertain periods for which many of them are given work should
be compensated by an hourly rate of pay at least as great as that
of the regular workers.




LAUNDRIES
Introduction.
The 1935 Census of Manufactures reported for Kentucky a total
ot 103 laundries, together employing an average of 3,144 wage
earners. Thirty-live of these laundries, with an average of 1,375
\v age earners, wTere in Louisville. The Women’s Bureau survey in
the fall of 1937 covered 52 commercial laundries, employing 1,952
wage earners; 22 of these, with 1,058 wage earners, were in Louis­
ville. In addition, 105 wage earners employed as laundry workers
in 8 hotels or restaurants were included in the study, bringing the
total number of laundry workers to 2,057. Of this number 1 715
were women—1,444 being white and only 271 Negro.
The women studied are the operatives engaged in such occupations
as marking and sorting, hand ironing, operating flat ironers and
presses, starching, folding, assembling, wrapping, and so forth.
Complete records of wages received and hours worked were secured
for these employees from the pay rolls for a normal workweek in
the late summer or early fall of 1937, all but three plants furnishing
records for a week in September. The records secured cover ail
women employed in the scheduled week, regardless of the time
worked, which ranged anywhere from a full workweek to as short
a period as 5 hours (one case).
Table 7.

Number of establishments visited arid number of men and women
they employed—Laundries
Type of laundry and race of women

Commercial:
Number of establishments.........
Number of men....................
Number of women___
White.......................
Negro. ............... ..
Hotel and restaurant:
Number of establishments_____ ______
Number of men..................
Number of women.___ ______
White......... ...........
Negro____ ______________

State

Louisville

52
326
1,626

8
16
89
86
3

Other
places in
State

22

3

13
79

COMMERCIAL LAUNDRIES
Location and size.
The commercial laundries included in this study are in the fol­
lowing cities and towns: Bowling Green, Elizabethtown, Frankfort,
Fulton, Henderson, Hopkinsville, Lebanon, Lexington, Louisville,




23

24

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

Madisonville, Mayfield, Maysville, Middlesborough, Owensboro, Pa­
ducah, Princeton, Ravenna, Richmond, and Somerset. Failure to in­
clude laundries in the Covington and Newport areas was due to the
fact that such laundries were closed down by a strike at the time
of the study.
The laundries ranged in size from 6 to more than 150 wage earn­
ers, only 3 having more than 100. Fifty percent employed less
than 30 wage earners, somewhat over 25 percent employed from 30
to 49, and the remainder had 50 or more.
Hours of work.
Since the Kentucky law permits women to be employed 10 hours
a day and 60 a week, it is of interest to see how many of the laun­
dries had a schedule of this length. Though nine laundries, six in
Louisville, reported a scheduled day of 10 hours, only one of these
had a scheduled week of 60 hours. In all the others the week was
reduced to less than 60 hours by a 5- or a 5%-day week. The laundry
with a scheduled week of 60 hours was in a small town, and the rec­
ords for the week studied showed that only one woman worked as
much as 54 hours.
In 9 laundries, with 208 women wage earners, the scheduled hours
varied so greatly from day to day that they are classed as irregular.
In the remaining 43 laundries the weekly schedule that affected the
largest number of women was over 48 and under 54 hours, 505 women
working under this schedule; 494 women had a schedule of more than
44 but under 48 hours; almost equal numbers—123 and 129—had a
schedule of over 40 and under 44 hours, and a schedule of 54 or 55
hours. Only 47 women had so short a week as 40 hours.
In actual practice few women in the Kentucky laundries worked
the full scheduled hours of the plants. As is common in this indus­
try, in certain occupations there was no work at the beginning of
the day on Monday, and on other days women who completed their
work left the laundry before the end of the scheduled hours. Fur­
ther, in some laundries most of the work was completed by Friday
night, and few or no women worked on Saturday. This being true,
the data show great differences between the scheduled hours and the
hours worked. Only 31 percent of the women worked 48 hours and
more, as compared with 53 percent on such a schedule; 38 percent
worked 40 and under 48 hours, as against 47 percent with this
schedule; and 31 percent worked less than 40 hours though none
had so short a schedule and only 3 percent had a week of 40 hours.
The number at the shortest hours probably includes most of the part­
time employees and many of the full-time employees who for per­
sonal or industrial reasons did not work full time in this particular
week.
Twenty-three percent of the women worked 50 hours or more,
but only 1 percent worked as much as 55 hours. Detailed figures,
by locality, are shown in the statement following.




LAUNDRIES

Hours worked

Number ot women with hours worked reported

25
State

Louisville

1,479

Other
places in
State

874

605

Percent of women
Under 40...........
40, under 48. _
48, under 50______
50 under 55______
55 and over______

30.8
38.3
8.3
21.8
.9

33.4
43.1
7.1
15.7
.7

26.9
31.2
10.1
30.6
1.2

Week’s earnings.
In all but one of the Louisville laundries most of the women
workers were paid hourly rates, only a small proportion being paid
piece rates or by the week. In the one exception practically all the
women were paid by the week. In the places other than Louisville,
about a fourth of the laundries paid the majority of their workers
daily or weekly rates. Whatever the basis of payment, laundry
workers usually are paid only for the time worked and the week’s
wages vary greatly on that account. The women in this study who
worked less than a full workweek include persons who lost time
from work for personal reasons, those employed for part-time work
at extra busy periods or to substitute for absent employees, some
regular employees for whom there was not a full week’s work, and
still a few others who regularly worked only part time. The last
named include, for example, several women in one small laundry
who worked only 2, 3, or 4 days a week at their own request.
Regardless of time worked, the average week’s earnings1 of all
women in commercial laundries were $9.05. For the State as a whole
there is little difference by race, the averages for white and Negro
being respectively $9.10 and $8.70. In Louisville especially were the
averages comparable, being $9.60 and $9.40, respectively, but in other
places the white women averaged $8.45 and the Negroes only $7.50.
Unpublished figures show that in the State as a whole 35 percent
of the women had earnings of $8 and under $10; considerable pro­
portions were in the 1-dollar groups just above and below these;
19 percent earned less than $7; and 20 percent earned $11 or more,
only 13 percent earning as much as $12.
The group with earnings below $5 is composed almost wholly of
women who worked less than 35 hours. However, one small-town
laundry, employing less than 10 women and operating only part time
in the scheduled week paid such low hourly rates as to warrant the
conclusion that a full week’s earnings would have been but little
more than $5 for some of its employees.
The foregoing data indicate to women their earnings opportuni­
ties in the laundry industry. It is equally interesting to know what
week’s wages represent in terms of return for labor expended, that
is, the wage in relation to time worked. The hours worked by
1,479 women and correlated with their earnings show that there
iThe median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount




WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

26

was an increase in earnings with hours worked up to and including
50 hours; above 50 hours, earnings fell, illustrating the condition
so commonly found in industry that long hours are accompanied
by low pay.
A week’s earnings and the average hourly earnings for the State
as a whole are shown for both types of laundries surveyed in table 8.
Table 8.—Week’s

Item

Total number of women.

earnings and hourly earnings of wonen—Laundries

and
Commer­ Hotel
restau­
cial laun­ rant
laun­
dries
dries
1, 626

89

WEEK’S EARNINGS
women
Women who worked 40 hours

Percent of total women who
earned—
Under $6
Under $8...-------- ---------Under $10...___ _______
Under $12......................... .
$12 and over...................

$9.05

$10.50

1,024
$9. 75

22

Item

HOURLY EARNINGS
Women with hours and earnings reported:
Number of women--------Average earnings 1 (cents).
Percent who earned—
Under 20 cents..................

11.0
32.6
67.3
87.1
12.9

c)

and
Commer­ Hotel
restau­
cial laun­ rant
laun­
dries
dries

Under 30 cents...................
Under 35 cents...................
35 cents and over...............

1,479
20.8

(>)

28. 5
76.9
94.0
98.9
1.1

(’>
(2)
t!)
(9

30

C!)

16.8
21.2
42.5
68.5
31.5

i The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.
* Not computed; base less than 50.

Hourly earnings.
•
In an industry such as laundry work, where week’s earnings vary
so greatly with hours worked, hourly earnings are better than
weekly earnings as a key to the adequacy of rates.
In the commercial laundries studied the average hourly earnings
for women were 22.5 cents in Louisville and 19 cents in the group
of other places. Analyzed by 1-cent intervals, the heaviest concen­
tration in Louisville occurred at the 20-cent interval, with 29 percent
of the women; in the other places there was fairly heavy concentra­
tion at both 18 cents and 20 cents, with respectively 22 percent and
24 percent of the women.
In the absence of any other standard for the laundry industry in
Kentucky, the rates established under the N. R. A. Laundry Code
may be used as a basis for comparison. These were 20 cents an
hour for Louisville and 18 cents an hour for other places, but it
should be kept in mind that these inadequate rates, which would
yield for 40 hours only $8 and $7.20, respectively, were intended to
be the minimum below which no one should be paid. The concen­
tration at 20 cents and 18 cents referred to, and the very large
proportions of women with hourly earnings above these amounts,
indicate code adherence or better on the part of many employers.
This is especially true of Louisville, where only 13 percent of the
women had average hourly earnings below 20 cents. In other places,
unfortunately, as many as 28 percent of the women had earnings
below the 18 cents set by the code.



LAUNDRIES

27

It is of interest further to compare hourly earnings in Kentucky
laundries with rates established under the provisions of minimumwage laws for women in two adjacent States, Illinois and Ohio,
b or purposes of wage fixing in the laundry industry, the State ad­
ministrative body having this matter in charge divided Illinois into
three districts. In district III, comprising the southern counties
of the State and the ones most nearly comparable to Kentucky the
rate fixed is 23 cents an hour. The rate set under the Ohio mini­
mum-wage law is 27y2 cents, and it is applicable to the entire State.
Year’s earnings.
Each laundry operator was asked to furnish a record of a year’s
earnings for 10 percent of his women workers. Several commercial
laundries were unable to furnish this information, so the number of
records obtained represents only about two-thirds of the establish­
ments and 8 percent of the women included in the study. In choosmg the women for whom the year’s records were to be furnished
the employers were asked to include only persons who worked regu­
larly anc* to make selections from each occupational group.
All but 2 of the 137 women for whom records of a year’s earnin<rs
were obtained had worked at least 48 weeks, 91 having worked 48
but under 52, and 44 having worked the whole year. Most of the
Louisville workers and a few of those in other places lost from 1 to
3 weeks time on account of the flood.
The average year’s earnings for the whole group were $512.50.
Approximately 12 percent of the women earned less than $400- 34
E6nt *,a™d $400 a?d under $50°; 29 Percent, $500 and under
$600; and 15 percent, $600 and under $700. The remaining 11 per­
cent of the women had earnings of $700 or more, three women
earning $850 or better.
The lowest earnings for the year of women who worked 48 weeks
or more were $353 in Louisville and $295 in the group of other
places. The highest earnings were $921 in Louisville and $718 in
the other places.
HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LAUNDRIES
In addition to the women in commercial laundries, 89 women in 1
restaurant and 7 hotel laundries were included in the study All
but three were white women. Five of the establishments, employing
79 women, were in Louisville.
Hours worked.
The number of hours worked during the week for which data
were secured was reported for only 30 of the women in hotel and
restaurant laundries, but two-fifths of these had exceeded 50 hours.
Obviously, the supply of work in a hotel laundry is fairly constant.
Earnings.
The average week’s earnings for this group of women were $10.50:
for Louisville with all but 10 of the women, the average was $10.80.
Of the total group of 89 women 11 percent earned less than $5,
I, <m'y 2 or these had worked a full week; 43 percent earned less
than $10 Thirty-two percent of all the women (35 percent in
Louisville) earned $12 or more.



DRY-CLEANING ESTABLISHMENTS
Twenty-eight dry-cleaning establishments were included in the
Kentucky study. According to the 1935 Census of Manufactures,
this number represents approximately one-third of such establish­
ments in the State. The cities and towns represented are Louisville
(with 10 establishments, employing 113 women), Bowling Green,
Elizabethtown, Frankfort, Fulton, Hopkinsville, Lebanon, Lexington,
Mayfield, Owensboro, Paducah, and Richmond.
The total number of women wage earners was 196, of whom only
5 were Negroes.
Of the 28 establishments 21 were operated as departments of laun­
dries. Only those independent cleaning establishments that- had at
least five women wage earners were studied, but in laundries large
enough to be included as such, the data secured for all women in­
cluded those in the dry-cleaning department, however few, and
these cleaning employees have been transferred from the laundry
section to the dry-cleaning section of the study.
Hours.
Prevailing hours were longer and wages were higher in the dry­
cleaning industry than in the laundry industry. Data on hours
worked were secured for 169 women; only 19 percent worked less
than 40 hours and more than half (54 percent) worked 48 hours or
more, 7 percent working at least 60 hours. The following summary
shows the percent distribution of women according to the hours
worked.
Number of women with hours worked reported— 169
Percent

Under 40 hours-------------------------------------------40, under 48 hours------------- --------------------------- 26.7
48, under 50 hours----------------------------------------16-»
50, under 55 hours---------- —------------------------- -o2
55, under 60 hours----------------------------------------60 hours and over--------------------------------------- *-l

Week’s earnings.
The average week’s earnings of the women in dry-cleaning estab­
lishments were $13.60 in Louisville and $11.90 in the group of other
places. Both averages are very much higher than those for the
laundry industry. Only 21 percent of the women in dry-cleaning es­
tablishments, in contrast to 67 percent of those in commercial laun­
dries, earned less than $10. In dry cleaning 58 percent earned $12
or more and 28 percent earned at least $15.
28




DRY-CLEANING ESTABLISHMENTS

Table 9.

29

Week’s earnings and hourly earnings of women—Dry cleaning
Item

Total number of women...
Average earnings—All women >
Women who worked 40 hours or more:
Percent of total women who earned—
Under $10....... .
Under $12
Under $16 _____
$16 and over ____

Week’s
earnings
196
$12. 65
137
$13. 60
37.2
41.8
64.8
76.5
23.5

Hourly
earnings

Item
Women with hours and
reported:
Number of women
Average earnings (cents)1

earnings

Under 20 cents. ...
Under 25 cents__
Under 30 cents____
Under 35 cents .. .
35 cents and over______

169
27.6
7.8
32.6
61.6
85.2
14.8

1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown.

Hourly earnings.
Hourly earnings ranged from 16 cents to as high as 83 cents, the
latter amount being earned by one woman only, who received both
salary and commission. Average hourly earnings were 29.9 cents in
Douisvdle and 24.3 cents in the group of other places. Eight percent
of the women earned less than 20 cents an hour and 25 percent earned
20 and under 25 cents; but 29 percent averaged 25 and under 30 cents,
24 percent averaged 30 and under 35, and as many as 15 percent aver­
aged at least 35 cents. Eighty percent of the women in Louisville, in
contrast to 42 percent of those in the other places, earned at least 25
cents an hour.
Year’s earnings.
Data on year’s earnings were secured for 16 women, or not quite 10
percent of the total. Kecords of some establishments had been lost
m
Hood, and loss of time from the same cause reduced the year’s
earnings of more than two-thirds of the women for whom records were
obtained.
For the 16 women, year’s earnings ranged from a low of $551, the
iqi°f
Week for 52 weeks’t0 a hi£h of $1,294, equivalent
to $24.89 a week. Five women earned less than $650, four earned $650
and under $750, three earned $750 and under $850, and four earned




HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS
Introduction.
In the survey of Kentucky hotels and restaurants an effort was made
to cover a representative number of establishments in all parts of the
State. According to the 1935 Census of Business, the State had at
that time 355 hotels, with an average for the year of 3,487 employees,
and 1,499 restaurants, cafeterias, and lunchrooms, with an average for
the year of 4,274 employees. Nearly two-fifths of the workers, 38 per­
cent of those in hotels and 37 percent of those in restaurants, were in
Louisville. In the recent survey, data were obtained for 63 establish­
ments—18 hotels with 1,644 employees and 45 restaurants with 1,261
employees. Fifteen of the hotels had restaurant-service departments,
and almost one-half (47 percent) of the hotel employees were in these
departments. The majority of the restaurants, 34 establishments with
1,094 employees, were independent, but 11 establishments with 167
employees were operated in connection with stores.
. _
The large majority of the workers reported—69 percent in inde­
pendent restaurants, 72 percent in hotels, and 81 percent in store res­
taurants—were employed in establishments in Louisville. Data were
secured in 14 other cities and towns.1
_
The wage and hour data secured were for a pay period in September
1937 for all but two establishments, in which a period in October or
November was substituted.
,_
Women workers were outnumbered by men in hotels, constituting
only 41 percent of the employees, but in independent restaurants
women comprised 57 percent, and in store restaurants 87 percent, of
the workers. Most of the women were white, but in several occupa­
tions, particularly in the lodging and kitchen departments, there were
substantial numbers of Negroes. Twenty-six percent of the women
in hotels, 13 percent of those in independent restaurants, and 6 percent
of those in store restaurants, were Negro women. These fields of em­
ployment offer more opportunities to Negro men than to Negro women.
In contrast to the proportions just quoted for Negro women, Negro
men comprised 53 percent of all men in hotels, 45 percent of all those
in independent restaurants, and more than three-fourths of the small
group in store restaurants.
_
Practically nine-tenths of the 177 Negro women in hotels were in
lodging departments and less than one-tenth were kitchen workers; in
restaurants, including both independent and store types, more than
four-fifths of the Negro women were kitchen workers.
In most cases the establishments scheduled were small. Only 4
hotels and 2 independent restaurants employed as many as 100 work­
ers; the largest hotel had over 500 employees and the largest inde­
pendent restaurant had less than 300. The largest store restaurant hadi
i Bowling Green, Covington, Frankfort, Hopkinsville, Lexington, Madisonville, Mayfield,
Maysville, Middlesborougli, Mount Sterling, Newport, Owensboro, Paducah, and Somerset.

30




HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS

31

fewer than 50 employees. Six hotels, 21 independent restaurants, and
9 store restaurants each employed fewer than 25 workers.
Table 10.

Number of establishments visited and number, sex, and race of their
employees—Hotels and restaurants
Number of employees

Type of establishment

Number
of es­
tablish­
ments Total

Men

Women

Total White Negro Total White Negro

Per­
cent
women
are of
all em­
ployees

STATE
Hotels.......................... .
Independent restaurants..............
Store restaurants________

18
34
11

1,644
1,094
167

972
473
22

455
259
5

517
214
17

672
621
145

495
538
137

177
83
8

40.9
56.8
86.8

379
206
5

354
117
14

453
433
117

350
386
111

103
47
6

38.2
57.3
86.0

163
97
3

219
188
28

145
152
26

74
36
2

47.8
55.6
90.3

LOUISVILLE
Hotels___ __________
Independent restaurants_____
Store restaurants.....................

7
15
6

1,186
756
136

733
323
19

OTHER PLACES IN STATE
Hotels................ ...........
Independent restaurants._
Store restaurants

__

11
19
5

458
338
31

239
150
3

76
53

The data obtained in the survey covered scheduled days and hours
of work, number of days worked in the week reported, week’s earn­
ings, rate of pay, the practice in regard to meals, lodging, and tips,
and the policy as to furnishing and laundering uniforms. Earnings
data were reported for 1,438 women; 672 were in hotels, 621 in inde­
pendent restaurants, and 145 in store restaurants. The number with
scheduled hours reported was 1,370; of these, 641 were hotel workers,
598 were in independent restaurants, and 131 were in store restaurants.
HOURS
Scheduled hours.
The scheduled days and hours, that is, the regular shifts that the
women were supposed to work each week, showed considerable vari­
ation in the different types of establishment and for different em­
ployees of each establishment. The most favorable schedules were
round in store restaurants—usually serving only one or two meals_
and women in hotels had the longest work schedules. Nearly ninetenths (88 percent) of the women in store restaurants were sched­
uled to work 6 days, and over one-tenth (11 percent) were on a
schedule of less than 5 days. As stores generally are closed on
Sundays, none of the women in these restaurants were required to
work 7 days.
'
As independent restaurants and hotels generally are open for busi­
ness every day of the week, many workers in these places were sched­
uled to work every day. In independent restaurants 23 percent of
tile women were on a 7-day schedulej but in hotels the proportion



WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

32

on such a schedule was 63 percent. The largest group in independ­
ent restaurants, 76 percent, were on a 6-day schedule.
The weekly hours showed an extremely wide range, some women
having a schedule of less than 32 hours and others being required
to work 60 hours or more. As shown in the accompanying table,
the largest group in hotels, 35 percent, were scheduled to work over
48 and under 56 hours, but as many as 14 percent were on a 56-hour
schedule, and 11 percent were on one of more than 56 hours.
Lodging and kitchen workers in hotels had the longest schedule, as
42 and 33 percent, respectively, of the women in these departments
had a schedule of over 48 and under 56 hours, and 29 and 24 percent,
respectively, were scheduled to work 56 hours or more. The most
common schedule of hours for dining-room workers was over 40 and
under 56 hours; 40 percent of the women were scheduled to work 48
and under 56 hours and 38 percent were scheduled to work over 40
and under 48 hours.
The largest group of women in independent restaurants, 37 per­
cent, were on a 48-hour schedule; the next largest group, 25 percent,
had a schedule of over 40 and under 48 hours. One-tenth of the
women were scheduled to work 40 hours or less, but as many as 13
percent had a workweek of 56 hours or more. The scheduled hours
of kitchen workers in independent restaurants were somewhat shorter
than those of dining-room workers; only 8 percent of the kitchen
women, compared to 15 percent of those in dining rooms, were sched­
uled to work 56 hours or more.
. .
Store restaurants had the shortest hours. The large majority of
women in these establishments, 65 percent, were on a week of 40
hours or less, 44 percent on one of less than 32 hours, and no one
was scheduled to work so long as 56 hours; 7 in 10 of the dining­
room women, but only 4 in 10 of those in the kitchen, had hours of
40 or less.
Percent of women whose scheduled weekly hours were—
Establishment and department

State—Total----------------------------Hotels—Total--------------------------Lodging department..................
Dining room........ .......................
Kitchen-----------------------------Independent restaurants—Total---Dining room...............................
Kitchen-----------------------------Store restaurants—Total----- -------Dining room............................. Louisville—Total.......... .................—
Other places in State—Total...........

Num­
ber of
women

Over
40 and 40,
under derun­
48

48

Over
48, un­
der 56

56

Over
56, un­ 60 and
over
der 60

1,370

13.0

22.4

23.9

23.2

8.5

5.9

3.1

641
368
201
72
598
472
126
131
107
954
416

4.7
5.4
3.5
4.2
10.5
10.8
9.5
i 64.9
3 70.1
12.7
13.7

20.0
7.9
38.3
30.6
24.7
22.9
31.7
23.7
21.5
22.9
21.4

15.0
16.3
14.9
8.3
37.0
39.0
29.4
7.6
4.7
30.7
8.2

35.4
41.6
24.9
33.3
14.4
12.5
21.4
3.8
3.7
18.3
34.4

13.9
16.8
9.5
11.1
4.7
5.1
3.2

8.4
9.2
7.5
6.9
4.5
5.1
2.4

2.7
2.7
1.5
5.6
4.2
4.7
2.4

8.8
7.9

6.1
5.5

.5
8.9

1 44 percent were scheduled at less than 32 hours.
* 51 percent were scheduled at less than 32 hours.

Scheduled hours were somewhat shorter in Louisville than in other
places, but in both groups there was a substantial proportion on
schedules of 56 hours or more; 15 percent in Louisville and 22 percent
in other places had such hours. The largest proportion in Louisville,



HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS

33

31 percent, were scheduled to work 48 hours; in other places the
largest group, 34 percent, had a week over 48 and under 56 hours.
In hotels and restaurants workers have shifts that are irregular
with hours varying considerably from day to day. To show the
variation m daily work shifts over a pay period, and also to show
the spread of hours or the time from the beginning to the end of
the workday, including the periods of free time, the employee-day
is a convenient measure. Employee-days are obtained by multiplying
each daily work shift, of whatever duration, by the number of times
such shift was worked by the employees during the week. For ex­
ample, an employee working 2 5-hour and 4 9-hour days would con­
tribute 6 employee-days to the table on hours of work, 2 entered at
5 and under G hours and 4 entered at 9 and under 10 hours. This
makes clear the extent to which very short and over-Ion o- hours are
the practice in these industries. The number of employee-days in a
week generally is about six times the number of women employed.
In the table following is shown for each type of establishment
the percent of employee-days with certain hours of work and the
spread of their hours. In the dining rooms and kitchens of hotels,
only 6 percent of the employee-days had more than 9 hours of work
but 31 percent of the days had a spread of at least 12 hours (in a few
cases 17 or more) between the beginning of work in the morning and
the quitting of work at night. In independent restaurants only 5
percent of the days exceeded 9 hours of work, but on 27 percent of
t xe days the spread was at least 11 hours, in some cases as much as
16, between beginning and ending work. In contrast to these propor­
tions, the figures for hotel lodging departments and for store restau­
rants show a long spread of hours in comparatively few cases.
Table 11.—Comparison of hours of. work and spread of hours, long employee-

days in hotels and restaurants
Hotel
lodging
depart­
ments

Hours

Number of women _
Number of employee-days
Percent

368
3,682
of

Employee-Days With Hours

Over 9, under 10_„
10_______
Over 10, under 11_____
11_______
Over 11, under 12__
Percent

Hotel
restaurant Independ­
Store
ent
depart­
restaurants restaurants
ments

of

Work

as

Specified

1.3
1.2

2.5
1.8

.3

1.1

1.1
2.6
.5
.4

.4

of

Employee-Days With Spread

of

Over 10, under 11 _
11, under 12____
12, under 13__.........
13, under 14_____
15, under 16............
16, under 17_____




Hours

as

131
710

1
3.4
0.

Specified
11.2
10.3

1.2

8.0
6.2

.8
.3

2.5

1.7
1.9
1.4

—
0.4
.7
3.2

34

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

EARNINGS
Week’s earnings.
In hotels and restaurants it is customary for employees to have their
cash wages supplemented by meals or meals and lodging, but the prac­
tice varies between establishments and between individuals within an
establishment. Because of the variations, and also because many em­
ployers do not report the cash equivalent of meals, their value is not
included in the earnings figures shown in this report. However, to
indicate the extent of the practice of furnishing meals to employees
and the extent to which this practice affects the cash wages paid,
tabulations have been prepared for employees receiving and those not
receiving meals.
Another important item to be considered is that many employers
expect the workers, particularly the waitresses, to receive part of their
wages in tips from customers. As the amounts received m tips were
not learned in the present study, except in a small number of cases,
they are not included in the earnings figures shown.
In the week recorded the average cash earnings of women varied
from $4.70 for the dining-room workers in hotels to $11.35 for the
kitchen workers in hotels. For the total groups of employees, the
average was highest in store restaurants, in spite of the fact that these
establishments had the shortest schedule of hours.
In each type of establishment the women working in the kitchen
departments had the highest earnings, the averages shown for these
women being the $11.35 in hotels just referred to and $9.30 m
independent restaurants.
.
.
Dining-room workers, many of whom were reported to receive tips,
had the lowest cash earnings, shown by averages varying from the
$4.70 in hotel dining rooms to $8.45 in independent restaurants. The
women in hotel lodging departments had average cash earnings of
$8.60.
The average cash earnings in Louisville were $8.65 in hotels, $8.95
in store restaurants, and $9.20 in independent restaurants. In other
cities and towns the women in hotels had average earnings of $7, or
$1.65 lower than the average for Louisville, and those in independent
restaurants an average of $7.60, or $1.60 lower than was shown for
Louisville.
The importance of supplements as forming a part of the total wage
is indicated by the large number of women who were reported as
receiving meals. The proportion ranged from 44 percent in hotels—
only 5 percent of the lodging-department workers, but 95 percent of
those in the restaurant departments—to 75 percent in store restaurants
and 82 percent in independent restaurants.
The following shows the number of women given meals:
1 meal

Hotels------------------- ----------------------------------------- 40
Independent restaurants-------------------------------------- aoo
Store restaurants------------------------------------------------95

2 meals

185
—

3 meals

meals

62
85
14

374
115
36

The average cash earnings of the women who received meals were
$5.90 in hotels, $8.15 in independent restaurants, and $8.95 in store
restaurants. Women who did not receive additions had considerably



HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS

35

higher averages—$8.55 in hotels and $12.50 in independent res­
taurants.
12. Week’s cask earnings of women, hy department in which employed
and oy whether or not receiving additions to wages1—Hotels and
restaurants

Table

HOTELS
Restaurant department
Week's cash earnings

Total

Number of women___ ____
Average earnings 2_______

Lodging
depart­
ment

672
$8.20

379
$8.60

Total
293
$5. 80

Percent of Women with Earnings
No cash wage______ _______
Under $2—_ ............ ........
$2, under $6_____________
$6, under $10.......................... .
$10, under $14_____________
$14 and over..............................

0.7
3.9
26.6
42.2
19.6
6.8

2.9
11.9
62.7
16. 1
6.4

Dining
room
215
$4.70
as

1.7
5.1
45.8
15.7
24.2
7.5

Women Women
receiving not re­
additions ceiving
Kitchen to wages additions
to wages
78
$11.35

298
$5. 90

374
$8. 55

1.7
5.0
44.7
15.7
23.2
9.7

2.9
12.2
63.4
16.9
4.5

Specified
2.3
7.0
58.1
13.1
13.5
6.1

11.5
23.0
53.8
11.5

INDEPENDENT RESTAURANTS

Week's cash earnings

Total

Number of women_______
Average earnings 2_________
Percent

Dining
room

621
$8.65
of

Women

with

Under $2...................................
$2, under $6 ____________
$6, under $10______________
$10, under $14 _________ .
$14 and over................. ..................

Earnings

493
$8. 45
as

Women Women
not re­
Kitchen receiving ceiving
additions additions
to wages to wages
128
$9.30

506
$8.15

115
$12. 50

Specified

27! 7
4.8
STORE RESTAURANTS

Number of women__________
Average earnings 2...................
Percent or Women
Under $2____
$2, under $6__
$6, under $10 _
$10, under $14.
$14 and over—

145
$9.15
with

Earnings
8.3
10.4
37.9
38.6
4.9

$7.95
as

$8.95

36

Specified
10.3
11.2
43.1
31.0
4.3

7.3
10.1
42. 2
36.7
3.6

1 Chiefly meals. In the case of hotels, some lodging.
1 The median or midpoint, with half the earnings below and half above the amount shown. Average and
percent distribution not coumuted where base is less than 50.

Though the range of cash earnings of the women employed in
hotels was from less than $1 to more than $40, 27 percent of the
women were in the group earning $8 and under $10, and 28 percent
earned $4 and under $8, The largest group of those in the lodging de­



36

WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

partment (63 percent) earned $6 and under $10, but in the dining
rooms just under three-fifths (58 percent) had earnings of $2 and
under $6. Over 2 percent of the dining-room workers received no
cash wage at all. The majority of kitchen workers (54 percent)
earned $10 and under $14. Over one-fourth (27 percent) of the
women who earned less than $6, and as many as 45 percent of those
who earned $10 or more, did not receive meals or lodging.
The range in cash earnings of women in independent restaurants
was from less than $1 to over $46; the largest proportion, almost
one-fourth, earned $8 and under $10, and in each of the $2 intervals
of $4 and under $6, $6 and under $8, and $12 and under $14 there
were approximately one-sixth of the women.
The greatest concentration of earnings in store restaurants was at
$10 and under $14 (39 percent), followed by an almost equal pro­
portion at $6 and under $10.
Earnings and time worked.
The number of hours worked during the week was not available
in the majority of hotels and restaurants, but the number of days
on which the women worked was reported. In hotels, 55 percent of
the women worked on 7 days, and 28 percent worked on 6 days;
average earnings were a dollar higher for the 7-day workers. In
independent restaurants, on the other hand, 63 percent worked on 6
days and only 25 percent worked on 7 days. The difference in earn­
ings was slight—only 60 cents; and the women receiving meals ac­
tually averaged less for 7 days than for 6. No women in store
restaurants worked on 7 days; 77 percent worked on 6 days, and
the remainder worked on less than 6.
Actual earnings as distinct from average showed a very wide
range in each group. Of those in hotels who received meals, about
half (49 percent) of the group working on 6 days and about 1 wofifths (39 percent) of those working on 7 days had cash earnings
of less than $6, and only 32 and 21 percent, respectively, of the two
groups had earnings of $12 or more. Of the women in independent
restaurants who were given their meals, 23 percent of the 6-day
group and 15 percent of the 7-day group received less than $6 in cash
earnings.
.
Wages were higher for the women who did not receive meals, and
only small proportions had earnings of less than $6 when they
worked on 6 or 7 days. Of those working such a week, however,
almost a fourth in hotels and more than a fourth in store restaurants
earned less than $8. Less than 5 percent of the women in independ­
ent. restaurants who were not given meals and who worked on 6 or 7
days had earnings below $10.
Tips.
For many of the women employed in dining rooms, the employers
expect tips to make up a substantial proportion of the week’s wage.
Tips, however, are a very uncertain source of income, as their amount
varies in different establishments and from day to day in the same
establishment. The importance of tips in the minds of the employers
is indicated by a comparison of earnings of the women who did not
receive tips with those who were said to receive them. Three-fourths
of the hotel dining-room women were reported to have received tips,



HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS

37

of
,raSl1 earnin"fi were $3-70> compared to an average
tnrlorf n i
* dining-room women who did not receive tips. In
independent-restaurant dining rooms, where about two-fifths (39
ZTl°f the ■VomXn recelJef tips, average cash earnings were $5.70
for tliose receiving them and $9.95 for those not receiving them
ihe amount received in tips in 1 week was reported for a small
^roup of women—62 m hotel dining rooms and 67 in independentthe hotels waTfe fT™' l?6 TaveraSe amount received in tips in
ttie hotels was $3.15 a week. Just over three-tenths (31 percent)
of the women received tips amounting to $10 or more. In independ­
ent rcKfsiuratUs the average amount received in tips ($5.90) was
fifths l oer inn nf
cash.
($4.50). Nearly threenrtns (5b percent) of the women with tips reported received tins
s high as this. To rely on tips to form so large a part of the total
income as these figures indicate is a wholly unsound practice.
Rate of pay and scheduled weekly hours.
Though the amount of earnings actually received is the most im­
portant consideration to the worker, it is important also to know
he rate of pay; that is, the amount that the employer contracts to
pay for a specified number of hours of work. As many workerslose
time because of personal reasons or because of slack periods of busi
ness the actual earnings usually are lower than the rate of pay.
The summary following shows the average weekly rate of pay for
eStabIi8Wnt * -heduJ-hour gro^in'gs

Average weekly rate of pay i
Scheduled weekly hours

All employees

Lodging em­
ployees

Dining-room
employees

Kitchen em­
ployees

Number Average Number Average Number Average
Average
rate
rate
rate Number
rate
HOTELS
Total reporting 2_____
Over 40, under 48_.
48______________
Over 48, under 56.

_________

66
Over 56, under 60..

638
128
96
226
89
53

$8. 95
7.50
9.90
8. 70
10. 40
9.55

368

$0. 45

60
153
C2

10. 30
8. 75
10. 75

200
77

$5. 35
5. 05

70

$11. 50

457
106
176
59

9.15
7.05
9.65
11. 50

125

9.50

107
55

7.95
6.65

INDEPENDENT RESTAURANTS
Total reporting 2_____
Over 40, under 48..
48_____________
Over 48, under 50..

582
146
213

9. 25
7.90
9.60
10. 45

86

STORE RESTAURANTS
Total reporting 2_.
Under 32____

131
57

9.30
6. 65

1 The martian or midpoint, with half the rates below and half ah
ie amount shown. Gompiited only
or groups with SO or more women.
> Totals exceed details because groups with less than 50 women arp not sbpwa separately.




WOMEN IN KENTUCKY INDUSTRIES, 1937

38
The table shows that the average rate of pay was $8.95 for the
women in hotels, $9.25 for those in independent restaurants, and
$9.30 in store restaurants. In each type of establishment the rate
was highest for kitchen workers and lowest for dining-room workers.
The average rate of pay for women who received meals was $o.90
in hotels, $8.65 in independent restaurants, and $8.75 m store restau­
rants For those not receiving meals the average was considerably
higher, $9.45 in hotels and $12.80 in independent restaurants.
In hotels and independent restaurants weekly rates were very low
for large numbers of women scheduled to work more than 40 hours.
Unpublished figures show that among the women in hotels whose
workweek was longer than 40 hours, more than one-half of those who
were given meals had a wage rate under $6 and almost three-fifths
of those who were not given meals had a rate below $10.
Among the women in independent restaurants with a week ol more
than 40 hours, just over one-sixth of those who were given meals
had a rate below $6, as many as one-third having a rate below $8 Ut
those who were not given meals, only 4 percent had a rate of less than
$10, but almost 20 percent had a rate below $12.
In store restaurants all women who were supposed to work more
than 40 hours had a rate of $10 or more.
UNIFORMS
Another item very important to hotel and restaurant workers is
the policy in regard to uniforms, In some establishments unilorms
are furnished and laundered by the employer, but in too many cases
they are a considerable item of expense to the worker. In 28 ol the
58 establishments reporting, the uniforms were furnished by the
employer for all women employees and m 7 others uniforms were
furnished for part of the workers. However, m 23 establishments
all the women were required to furnish their own unilorms, any­
where from 2 to 8 a year being necessary. In 24 establishments all
the women were responsible for the laundering, and m 5 others some
of the women had that responsibility.
Store restaurants generally provided and laundered the unilorms
at no cost to the workers, but in the majority of independent res­
taurants reported, and in just over half the hotels, some or all ol the
women were reqidred to meet the expense of supplying the unilorms.
The cost of uniforms ranged from $1 to $4. In 14 establishments
the cost was reported to be from $1 to $1.95, in 3 establishments uni­
forms were rented from laundries. Weekly laundry costs were re­
ported in six establishments; in three the cost was 25 and 28 cents,
in one it was reported to be 60 cents, and in two it was respectively
$1.05 and $1.60. In 22 establishments it was reported that the women
laundered their own uniforms.




o