View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

U N IT E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T OF L A B O R
Frances Perkins, Secretary
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
Isador Lubin, Commissioner (on leave)
A . F. Hinrichs, A cting Commissioner

+

Wages in Department
and Clothing Stores
Large Cities, Spring and Summer 1943

Prepared by

D IVISIO N OF W A G E A N A L Y S IS
ROBERT J, MYERS, Chief

B ulletin 7^o. 801

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON s 1944

For sale by the][Superintendent o f Documents, U . S. Governm ent Printing Office
Washington 25, D. C. - Price 5 cents







Contents
Page

Summary----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------Characteristics of establishments studied-------------------- ---------------------------Types of stores-----------The labor force________
Working conditions____
Method and scope of survey.
Hourly earnings----------------< n i)

620030— 44




1
1

Letter o f Transm ittal

U n it e d S t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,
B u r e a u o f L a b o r St a t is t ic s ,
Washington , D . C ., November 20, 1944•

The

Se c r e ta r y of L a b o r :

I have the honor to transmit herewith a report on wages in department and
clothing stores in large cities, spring and summer of 1943. This report was
prepared by Joseph M. Sherman, under the direction of Harry Ober, in the v
Bureau's Division of Wage Analysis.

A. F.
H o n . F r a n c e s P e r k in s ,
Secretary o f Labor .




(IV)

H i n r i c h s , Acting Com m issioner .

B ulletin T^o. 801 o f the
U nited States B ureau o f Labor Statistics
[Reprinted from the M onthly L ab or R e v ie w , Novem ber 1944]

Wages in Department and Clothing Stores in Large
Cities, Spring and Summer of 1943
Summary
Median hourly rates of pay of workers in department, generalmerchandise, and clothing stores in selected large cities in the spring
and summer of 1943 ranged from 39 cents an hour for women bundle
Wrappers and stock girls to $1.18 (including commissions) for furniture
salesmen. These findings are based on information collected in 60
cities of 100,000 or more population. Kates of pay were appreciably
higher for selling than for nonselling workers.
The highest earnings among broad geographic regions were reported
for Pacific Coast workers, while rates of pay were lowest in southern
cities. Earnings of some workers in the Seattle-Tacoma area exceeded
$2 an hour. Many rates below 35 cents an hour were found in the
South. Wage rates were also found to differ substantially by size
of city. In every occupation, the highest median rates were found in
places of 500,000 or more, while the lowest were generally found in
Communities of 100,000 to 250,000.

Characteristics of Establishments Studied
Retail-trade employees constitute an important group of “ whitecollar” workers. In recent months more than 6,000,000 persons
have been employed in various branches of retailing. A substantial
proportion of these perform fairly similar functions— selling and
maintaining records in department, general-merchandise, dry-goods,
and clothing stores. During the war years, the importance of this
branch of the economy as an employer of labor has been eclipsed
by the dramatic increase in labor requirements in the industries
that are directly involved in the production and transportation of
war supplies for our armed forces.
Wage levels in retailing were generally lower than those in
manufacturing industries, even before the war. Moreover, because
of the relative decline in the demand for retail employees, the small
extent of union organization, and the traditional rigidity of whitecollar wages, the pre-war difference has probably increased. With
interest currently shifting to employment opportunities in peacetime
pursuits, however, the role of retail trade as a prospective employer
of labor assumes more importance. In evaluating this role, a cross




(1 )

2

section of current wage rates in representative branches of retail
trade should be of considerable interest.
TYPES OF STORES

According to the census of 1939 the branches of retail trade
represented in this study— department, general-merchandise, drygoods, and clothing*stores— accounted for about a fifth (about 900,000)
of all employees in retail trade, and for an equal proportion of the
total retail pay roll. These stores constitute an important segment
of the business life of all urban communities, but they are, as a group,
particularly important in cities with a population of 100,000 or more.
This concentration in the larger cities is most pronounced in the case
of the department and clothmg stores. The dry-goods and generalmerchandise stores, on the other hand, tend to be more important
in the smaller urban localities.
There is no, clear line of demarcation between department stores
and other types of stores engaged in general merchandising. At
one extreme, to be sure, it is possible to distinguish the large modern
store that is highly departmentalized in selling as well as adminis­
tration. At the other extreme is the small store that sells a wide
variety of merchandise but in which departmental specialization in
selling and accounting is nonexistent. Between these extremes
there are stores that sell a wide variety of merchandise and tend
toward departmental specialization in varying degrees. It is mainly
for this reason that the usual dividing line between department and
other stores is more or less arbitrary; stores with annual sales of
$100,000 or more are often classified as department stores while
those with lesser annual sales are considered general-merchandise
stores. In view of the general similarity of the functions and the
labor force in these different types of stores it was found practicable
to group them for study.
The 1939 census of retail trade shows the corporation to be the
dominant legal form of organization in all branches of retail trade
included in the study, with the exception of dry-goods and generalmerchandise stores. The corporate form of business organization, for
example, was found in 92 percent of all department stores, and these
accounted for 97 percent of total sales. Individual proprietorships
and partnerships, on the other hand, were found in 85 percent of the
dry-goods and general-merchandise stores and accounted for about
three-fifths of the sales of such stores.
In 1939, department stores averaged 111 full-time employees per
store, while the other types of stores included in the study were much
smaller. As is pointed out below, however, the smallest stores in all
lines were excluded from the scope of the study.
THE LABOR FORCE

Typical functions of the employees in the stores studied include
selling directly to customers, packing and unpacking goods, main­
taining stock records, and performing a variety of clerical office
functions relating to management and administration. There are,
of course, considerable differences in the duties of sales clerks; the
chief differentiating factors seem to be in the costliness of the items



3
sold and the amount of information that is entailed in presenting
various products to customers. Thus, employees engaged in selling
such items as furniture, pianos, men’s and women’s clothing, and
precious jewelry generally represent the more experienced and versatile
group of the Tabor force. On the other hand, employees who sell
inexpensive, standard items usually require little training or experience.
Department and clothing stores have historically been among the
most important employers of women. About 1 of every 25 women
gainfully employed in the United States in June 1943 worked in such
stores. Several of the branches of retail trade under discussion have
had a much higher proportion of women employees than retail trade
as a whole. Thus, in 1939, women formed about a third of the labor
force in retail trade as a whole, but two-thirds in department and cloth­
ing stores, seven-eighths in women’s ready-to-wear stores, and fiveninths in family clothing stores. In men’s and boys’ clothing stores,
on the other hand, only a sixth were women. In recent years the
growing labor shortage has induced many stores to place women in
positions normally filled by men.
W ORKING CONDITIONS

Employment in the branches of retail trade studied is highly
seasonal. Peak employment is usually reached in December. This
is followed by a drop in January and February, and a secondary peak
is reached in April. The level of employment is rather low in June,
July, and August, but thereafter it rises gradually as the Christmas
shopping period is approached. These swings in employment are
generally quite violent, and in some years the number of employees
in December is twice that in February. Characteristically the peaks
of employment are met by augmenting the regular labor force with
substantial numbers of part-time workers. In. 1939, about 1 of every
5 employees in the branches of retail trade studied was employed
part time. The ratio of part-time to full-time employees in depart­
ment stores at the Christmas peak is generally about 1 to 3.
Unionization in retail trade is not very extensive. Of the stores
studied only about 13 percent had union agreements covering sub­
stantial proportions of the employees. A higher proportion of
unionization was found among the larger stores and in the larger cities.
Unionization of department and clothing stores was most common
in the far western areas. All department stores studied in Tacoma
and Seattle were unionized. In the Northeast, unionization was more
common than in the United States as a whole, while in the South few
stores were unionized.
Typically, retail clerks in department and clothing stores receive
incentive payments in addition to their basic rates. The incentive
payments consist of some kind of commission on sales. In some
instances the commissions are paid as a flat percentage of total sales,
and in others they apply only to sales above a set quota or to sales of
particular items. The latter commissions are often referred to as
“ P. M .’s” (postmortems or push money) or “ Reds” (reductions), to
denote a reward for special effort in promoting sales of slow-moving or
especially profitable items. Some workers are on a “ draw commis­
sion” basis; that is, they draw a weekly salary related to sales in a
previous period. The actual commission earned is calculated from



4
time to time, and any excess over the amount drawn is credited to
the employee. This form of commission is most commonly found in
clothing, furniture, and floor-covering departments.

Method and Scope of Survey
Information on earnings of employees in department, generalmerchandise, dry-goods, and clothing stores was obtained in connec­
tion with the Bureau’s Occupational Wage Rate Project covering
characteristic industries in selected urban areas. The information
for each city covered by the survey is based upon all, or a representa­
tive sample of, such stores with 9 or more employees. The limita­
tion on size excluded numerous small dry-goods, general-merchandise,
and independent clothing stores.1 Moreover, in view of the fact that
the data presented in this study are limited to cities with a population
of 100,000 or more, the wage information is considerably influenced by
department and chain clothing stores. Of the cities in this size group,
data are presented for 12 of the 14 cities with half a million or more
inhabitants, and for three-fifths of the cities with population of
100,000 to 500,000.
The data for most of the selected cities refer to a pay-roll period
in the spring or summer of 1943. In examining the cross section of
wage rates during this period, it would be well to bear in mind that
wage rates in department and clothing stores have increased sub­
stantially since that time. A study of the trend in urban wage
rates,2 for example, indicates that from April 1943 to April 1944 wage
rates in these stores in the United States as a whole have increased
about 13 percent. In general, higher wage increases have been re­
ported in the regions with relatively lower wage levels than in those
regions where the highest wage levels typically prevail. Thus, the
highest increase (23.5 percent) was found in the Southwest, while
the lowest increase (4.6 percent) was in the Pacific Coast area.
Wage increases in the Southeast, Great Lakes, and Middle West
have also been higher than the average for the country as a whole.
The wage information presented in this article was obtained from
pay rolls and other related store records by field representatives of
the Bureau. Premium overtime payments and shift differentials were
excluded. In instances where employees were receiving commissions
based on sales volume, such earnings were included in the data pre­
sented. Uniform occupational descriptions were used in all establish­
ments to assure comparability in the classification of workers from
store to store.
Of the numerous job classifications found in the stores covered, the
few selected occupations for which data are presented in this report
accounted for a large majority of the labor force. In all, the employ­
ment in these occupations amounted to about 90,000 in the selected
cities. Of these, retail clerks accounted for about three-fourths of
the employees, and the nonselling occupations for the remainder.
Women employed as general clerks and as saleswomen in women’s
clothing departments were numerically by far the most important
retail clerical groups. Among the nonselling occupations studied,
1 In some areas, however, clothing stores with as few as 5 employees were included in the study.
2 See Wartime Wage Movements and Urban Wage-Bate Changes in Monthly Labor Beview for October
1944 (p. 684). (Beprinted as Serial No. K. 1684.)




5
cashiers were the most numerous classifications. Salesmen of men’s
clothing and furniture were among the least numerous retail-clerk
classifications. The job classifications included for study are limited
to characteristic store occupations; office employees, whose duties
in stores do not differ materially from those in other business or in­
dustrial establishments, were omitted.

Hourly Earnings
Median city average hourly earnings for selected selling and non­
selling job classifications are presented in table 1. These median
averages were derived from a simple array of individual city averages
for each classification. Although no attempt has been made to assign
different weights to individual cities, based on relative employment,
the data are useful in this form for purposes of rough comparison.
Detailed information on average hourly earnings by city and method
of wage payment may be observed in table 2.
Among the retail clerks the type of merchandise sold has a very
pronounced influence on straight-time average hourly earnings. The
highest median earnings, for example, were received by furniture
salesmen and amounted to $1.18. Employees selling men’s and
women’s clothing and shoes also earned appreciably more than other
sales clerks. In selling these commodities, however, men generally
earned appreciably more than women; thus, men selling men’s clothing
averaged $1.05 per hour whereas women selling women’s clothing
averaged 58 cents per hour. Salesmen of men’s shoes averaged 24
cents more than the saleswomen of women’s shoes. The lowest
average earnings (49 cents per hour) of specialized sales clerks were
received by women selling cosmetics and toiletries and hosiery. Gen­
eral clerks’ earnings also varied considerably by sex; men averaged
83 cents and women 50 cents per hour.
Earnings among the five selected nonselling occupations did not
show so much variation as those among the sales personnel; stock
girls and bundle wrappers earned on the average 39 cents per hour,
and women cashiers grades I and II, 50 and 43 cents per hour, re­
spectively.
A fairly consistent relationship between size of city and average
wage rates may be observed in table 1. As would be expected, average
earnings were appreciably higher in the largest cities (500,000 or more
population) than in the cities with a population o f 100,000 to 250,000.
Among retail clerks, the differences ranged from 36 cents for men’s
clothing salesmen to 5 cents in women’s hosiery departments. In the
nonselling jobs, also, average hourly earnings tended to vary with
size of city. Thus, cashiers in the largest cities earned 5 cents more,
stockgirls 3 cents more, bundle wrappers 6 cents more, and stockmen
8 cents more, than in cities with 100,000 to 250,000 population.
Although earnings varied appreciably from region to region the
contrast between earnings levels of northern and southern localities
does not appear to be so pronounced in retail trade as in manufacturing
industries. Earnings in cities of the Far West, however, were gen­
erally highest, while those in the South were generally lowest. Since
none of the southern cities is included in the “ 500,000 and over”
group, it is apparent that the wage variation by size of city, discussed




6

above, is due in part to regional differences. It will be noted, however,
that variation by size of city is also apparent within individual
regions.
T a b l e 1.— M edian H ou rly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, by C ity Size and Region , Spring and Summer o f 1943
Betail clerks
Male

Female

Region and size of city
Cos­
Hosi­
Furni­ General Men’s
metics General ery,
clerks clothing Shoes and toi­ clerks wom­
ture
letries
en’s
All cities............................................................

$1.18

$0.83

$1.05

$0.84

$0.49

$0.50

$0.49

Cities with population of—
600.000 and over.........................................
260.000 and under 600,000...........................
100.000 and under 260,000...........................

1.30
1.19
1.14

.92
.82
.84

1.24
1.12
.88

.99
.88
.80

.57
.52
.46

.60
.50
.46

.52
.52
.47

Northeastern cities...........................................
Border State cities............................................
Southern cities..................................................
Middle Western cities...................................
Mountain and Pacific Coast cities..................

1.18
1.31
1.06
1.25
1.49

.84
.80
.78
.85
.89

1.04
1.13
.88
1.06
1.39

.86
.86
.77
.93
.99

.46
.51
.50
.53
.60

.51
.47
.46
.53
.64

.47
.46
.48
.50
.61

Retail clerks—
Continued

Region and size of city

Female—Con.

Shoes

Nonselling occupations
Male

Female

Wom­ Stock- Bundle Cash­ Cash­
iers,
en’s
iers,
wrap­
clothing men
pers grade I2 grade
II2

Stockgirls

All cities____ ____ ____ _____________ ______

$0.60

$0.58

$0.48

$0.39

$0.50

$0.43

$0.39

Cities with population of—
600.000 and over..... ....................................
260.000 and under 600,000...........................
100.000 and under 250,000...........................

.71
.62
.53

.62
.61
.55

.54
.49
.46

.44
.38
.38

.53
.50
.48

.48
.42
.43

.42
.38
.39

Northeastern cities...........................................
Border State cities............................................
Southern cities....... ..........................................
Middle Western cities........ .............................
Mountain and Pacific Coast cities..................

.62
.52
.49
.60
.79

.57
.58
.54
.60
.83

.49
.47
.40
.51
.57

.40
.38
.35
.42
.54

.48
.48
.46
.50
.61

.43
.48
.38
.44
.57

.41
.37
.33
.40
.50

1 Exclusive of premium pay for overtime or late-shift work.
2 In general, the cashier, grade I, accepts payments on charge accounts, cashes customers’ checks, and’sells
gift certificates besides assuming, whenever necessary, the duties of the cashier, grade II, who accepts pay­
ment for sales slips made out by clerks, makes change, and may also wrap packages.

Significant differences in earnings were found between workers paid
on a time basis and those on an incentive basis (table 2). The largest
variations between earnings of time and incentive workers occurred
among sales clerks in furniture, clothing, and shoe departments.
Furniture salesmen receiving commissions earned on the average 40
cents an hour more than the corresponding time workers; men’s
clothing salesmen and general clerks (male) averaged 27 and 8 cents,
respectively, more per hour on an incentive than on a time basis.
Women shoe clerks earned 15 cents more per hour on an incentive
than on a time basis.




7
T able 2.— Average H ourly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, b y M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Summer 1943
Retail clerks
Male
Furniture

Region and city

General clerks

Men’s clothing

All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
tive work­
tive work­
tive
work­ work­ work­
work­ work­
work­ work­
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers

Northeast
600,000 population and over:
Boston...................................................
Buffalo............................................
New York...............................................
Philadelphia.................. ...............
Pittsburgh......................................
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Providence..............................................
Rochester....................... ........................
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Bridgeport.........................................
Fall River................................
Hartford................................................
New Bedford....................................
New Haven......... ................................
Lowell................................................
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre........ .................
Springfield..............................................
Syracuse.................................................
Worcester..................................... .........

$1.28
1.44 $0.95
1.69
1.57

$1.36

1.57
.97

.97
.96
(3)
1.22
1.01
.95
1.75
1.05
1.11
1.24
1.14

$1.28
1.48 $1.11 $0.92

(3)

.79
.74

(3)
(3)
1.22
1.01
.95
1.75
1.22
1.11
1.24
1.40

.84

.84

.81
.94

.53
(3)

.64

.64

.99
.95

$1.41 $0.99
1.04
(3)
1.33
.93
1.15
(3)
1.33
(3)

$1.50
1.04
1.39
(3)
1.34

1.27
.77

1.17

1.29
.77

.89
1.05
.99
.72
.80
.83
1.12
1.13
.90
.92

.70
.72
.84
.70
.75
.82
1.12
1.14

1.07
1.10
1.10
.91
.83
.84

.84

1.13
.90
.98

1.20
1.07

1.12
.93

1.20
1.13

.63

1.19
1.17

Border States
500,000 population and over:
Baltimore................................................
Washington.........................................
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
N orfolk.................................................
Richmond....... ..................................... .

.92
(3)

1.00
1.42

1.00
1.42

.90
.71

.90
.71

1.46
1.20 '".’ 70‘

1.46
(3)

.84
.76

.81
.63

.93
.95

1.19
.'88

1.23
1.19 _____
.88
.96
1.02
(3)
(3)

1.23
1.19
.88
.96
1.07
(3)

.79
.79
.89
.73
.69
.77

.51
.64
.53
.66
.62
.73

.85
.94
.93
.77
.76
.93

1.16
1.04
1.05
1.18
.84
(3)

.82
.89
.97
.90
.57

1.24
1.11
1.06
1.28
.89
(3)

1.02
(3)
.67
(3)
1.09
1.50
(3)

1.21
(3)
122
(3)
1.18
1.50
<3)

.64
.63
.92
.96
.78
1.11
.64
.83
.63
.72

.60
.42
.85
.51
.50
.98
.46
.62
.42
.71

.81
.83
.96
1.16
1.05
1.28
.72
1.01
.71
.79

.62
.64
.88
.86
1.18
.84
.66

.63
.44
.57
(3)
.93
.43

.55
.71
1.11
.86
1.18
.80
.79

1.39
(3)

(3)

.80
.95

.77
.82

.83
.96

South
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Atlanta...................................................
Birmingham...........................................
Dallas...................................................
Houston.................................................
New Orleans............. .............................
San Antonio_____________ __________
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Charlotte.............................. .................
Chattanooga....................... ...................
Fort Worth............................................
Jacksonville............................................
Knoxville................................................
Miami................................... .................
NashviHe..............................................
Oklahoma City
Tampa....................................................
Tulsa.................................

1.09

.86
.40
.65

___

1.09

1.39

Middle West
500,000 population and over:
Chicago— ..............................................
Milwaukee.... .......................
St. Louis_________________ __________
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Indianapolis............................................
Kansas City........................................ .
Minneapolis-St. Paul............................

See footnotes at end of table.




1.33

(3)

1.34
1.25
1.13

1.33
1.13

1.13
(3)

1.36
1.25
1.13

.82
.83
.98

.47
.87

.84
.83
1.00

1.27

.94

1.29

1.18

.73

1.20

1.09
1.04
1.18

.61
(3)
.71

1.16
1.02
1.24

8
T able 2.— Average H ou rly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, b y M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Sum m er 1943 — Con.
Retail clerks
Male
Region and city

Furniture

Men’s clothing

General clerks

All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
tive work­
tive work­
tive
work­ work­
work­ work­
work­ work­ workers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers

Middle IFest—Continued
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Des M oines.................................
Duluth-Superior..........................
Flint..............................................
Fort Wayne. .
Gary________
Grand Rapids
Peoria_______
South Bend..

$1.04

$1.04
1.56
1.25
1.34
1.18

$0.77
09
.94
09
1.24 $1.06
.45
1.08
.85
.74
.54
.74
.89
.58
.59
.57

$0.87 $0.82
09
.95
.83
09
1.65 1.08
1.59 1.05 $0.74
.94
.88 .64
.78
.97
.74
.41
.78 1.23
.92

$0.93
.91
1.08
1.25
1.02
.81
1.28

Mountain and Pacific
500.000 population and over:
Los Angeles..................................
San Francisco..............................
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Denver..........................................
Portland........................................
Seattle-Tacoma........ .............. .
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Sacramento...................................
Salt Lake City..............................
San Diego.....................................
Spokane........................................

1.11 $1.06
1.14 1.03

1.12
1.34

.96

.89

.89

.89

1.84
1.95

1.00

1.84
2.02

1.49

.93

00
09

09
09

1.66

.88

.89
.82

.88
.89
.66

1.04

1.24
1.49

1.06
1.29

1.34
1.53

1.6l

1.51
1.39

.90
.96

1.68
1.66

1.66

1.15

1.14

1.16

09

09

1.42

Retail clerks—Continued
Male—Continued
Region and city

Female
Cosmetics and
toiletries

Shoes

General clerks

All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­
tive work­
tive work­ work­
tive
work­ work­ work­
work­ work­
ers
ers
ers
ers work­
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers

Northeast
500.000 population and over:
Boston........ ..................................
Buffalo..........................................
New York...................... ............ .
Philadelphia......................... .......
Pittsburgh................................... .
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Providence................................ .
Rochester
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Bridgeport................................... .
Fall River.....................................
Hartford........................................
New Bedford................................
New Haven...... ...........................
Lowell.......................................... .
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre___ _____
Springfield................................... .
Syracuse........................................
Worcester.....................................

See footnotes at end o f table*




$1.03
.93
1.08 $1.11
.94
09
1.01
(»)
.89
.78
1.10
.72
.95
.80
.77
.72
.61
.84
.72

$1.03
09 (3)
.93 $0.46 $0.40
1.06
.49
.57
09
1.02
.44
.58

$0.47
.49
.59

.74
.69

.93
.86

.49
.47

.49
.42

.49
.56

.73

.60

.79

.47
.46
.54
.42
.40
.44
.39
.46
.40
.47

.46
.37
.52
.40
.40
.43
.34
.43
.46
.47

09

.81
.73
.55
.74

1.11
.75
.97
.81
.62
.72
* .63
.86

09
.91
09

.55
.54
.43
.47
.44
.50
.36
.47

$0.63 $0.56
.54
09
.69
.68
.57

$0.75

09

.69

• .57

09

09

.44
.49

.38
.51

.72
.48

.44

.42

.49

.47

.47

9
T able 2.— Average H ourly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, by M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Summer 1943 —Con.
Retail clerks—Continued
Male—Continued

Cosmetics and
toiletries

Shoes

Region and city

Female
General clerks

All Time Incen­
All Time Incen­ All -Time Incen­
tive work­
tive work- work- tive
work­ work­ work­
work­ work­
work­
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers

Border States
600.000 population and over:
Baltimore......................................
Washington..................................
100.000 and under 260,000 population:
Norfolk.........................................
Richmond.....................................

$0.82 $0.77
.94
.60
.90
.72

$0.85 $0.51 $0.45

.97

.91

.57

.58

.43

.43

$0.52 $0.49 $0.49
. 50
.53
.52

$0.49
.53

(3)

.44

.45
.38

.43
.38

.49

.53
.67
.50
.44

.45
.47
.47

.40

.49
.53
. 55
.52

.42
.40

.30
.40
.31
.30
.37
.47

.37
.45
.40
.51
.42
.53
.43
.40
.40
.60

.35
.37
.40
.45
. 33
.50
.33
.40
.34
.08

.40
.40
.48
.52
.45
.54
.52
.58
.48
.51

.09
(3)
.54

.53
.58
.01

.48
.55

.59
.58
.61

.04
(3)
.00
. 54 .........

.02
. 60
.54

.53
.50
.50

.41
.38
.42

. 55
.58
.63

.43
.49
.55
.48
.48

(3>
.44
.61
.40
.45

.44
.57
(3)
.49
.55

.45
.52

(3)
(3)

. 45
.54

.48
. 53
.50
.40
. 56
.50
.47

.52
. 53
.49
.43
.38
.39
.42

.47
.57
.59
.50
.59
.54
.49

.04
1.13

.51
.78

.73
1.23

.59

1.01

(3)

.78
.49
.04
.89

.76
1.11
.79
.70
.74
(3)

.51
.51
.58
.47
.40

.40
.40

.53
(3)
.40
.48
(3>
.73
.44

(3)
.85
.93
.95
.70
1.20
.57

.41
. 55
.41
.44
.38
.02
.50

.41
(3)
.42
.52
.38
.57
. 55

.88

(3)
.59

.59

1.27

.08
(3)
.54

(3)

South
250.000 and under ,500,000 population:
Atlanta.................................................... .70
Birmingham........................................... 1.08
Dallas.....................................................
.70
Houston.................................................. .00
New Orleans........................................... .78
San Antonio...........................................
(3)
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Charlotte................................................
.54
Chattanooga........................................... .85
Fort Worth............................................. .77
Jacksonville............................................ .83
Knoxville................................................ .09
Miami..................................................... .80
Nashville................................................
Oklahoma City......................................
Tampa....................................................
.88
Tulsa.......................................................

.01
.49
.30

.54
.56
.39
.39
.63
.44
(3)

.46
.46

Middle West
500.000 population and over:
Chicago........................................................ 1.23
.75
Milwaukee..................................................
St. Louis.....................................................
.97
(3)
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Indianapolis................................................ 1.26
(*>
Kansas C ity............................................... 1.03
.73
Minncapolis-St. Paul............................... . 90
.66
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
-73
(3)
Dos M oines................................................
Duluth-Superior.......................................
. 82
.08
Flint..............................................
.90 ........
(3)
Fort W ayne................................................ . 90
G a ry.......... .................................................
.82
.81
Grand Rapids............................................
Peoria..........................................................
.84
.74
South Bend................................................

.98
1.28
1.06
.97
.75

.88

.90
1.01
.83
.84
(3)

.52

Mountain ami Pacific
500.000 population and over:
Los Angeles..................................
San Francisco...............................
250.000 and under 500.000 population:
Denver..........................................
Portland.......................................
Soallle-Tacoma............................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Sacramento...................................
Salt Lake City.............................
San Diego......................................
Spokane........................................

See footnotes at end of table.




.99
1.09

.93
.92

1.04

1.22

.71
.08

.63
.64

.75
.70

.88
1.21

.83
.70

.90
1.34

.58
.00

.50
.59

.01
.02

(3)

......

(3)

1 I?)

. 78" ’ "."75"!

.......i......... I

(3)

(3)

'."54

'."52

(3)

.53

.53

.97

.67

1.00

.78
.56
.54
.47

.77
.50
. 54
.40

.80
.05
.69

10
T able 2.— Average H ou rly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, b y M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Sum m er 1943— Con.
Retail clerks—Continued
Female—Continued
Region and city

Hosiery, women’s

Shoes

Women’s clothing

All T im e Incen­
All Tim e Incen­
All Tim e Incen­
tive work­
tive workwork­ work­
work­ work­ work­
work­ tive
ers
ers
ers
ers
era
ers work­
ers
ers
ers

Northeast
500,000 population and over:
Boston............................
Buffalo...........................
New York......................
Philadelphia..................................
Pittsburgh.....................................
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Providence....................................
Rochester.................. - ..................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Bridgeport.....................................
Fall River.....................................
Hartford........................................
New Bedford................................
New Haven...................................
Lowell...........................................
Scranton-W ilkes-Barre................
Springfield.....................................
Syracuse........................................
Worcester......................................

$0.49 $0.42
.49
.52
.50
.50
09
.54
.43

$0.59
.49 $0.74
(*)
.69 $0.64
.55
.66
0
0
.73
.55
.51

$0.74
.72
0
.75

$0.62 $0.51
.52
.66
.64
.58
0
.66
.57

$0.63
.52
.73
0
.67

.53
.44

.49
.43

.57
.46

.62
.69

.60
.51

.63
.73

.53
.57

.51
.51

.56
.65

.47
.42
.57
.43
.44
.44
.43
.46
.47
.50

.43
.38
.52
.41
.44
.42
.34
.44
.43
.40

.52
.53
.66
.47
.42
.50
.48
.50
.51
.54

.61
.47
.64
.66
.43
.53
.45
.57
.50
.60

.48
.41
.57
.49
.43
.43
.37
.54
.39
.48

.81
.53
.68
.69
.43
.59
.46
.60
.52
.69

.64
.50
.61
.47
.59
.54
.54
.53
.49
.57

.52
.45
.55
.46
.49
.52
.40
.50
.42

.80
.55
.66
.49
.65
.57
.59
.55
.49
.62

.48
.58

.50
.54

.48
.62

.54
.69

.48

.55
.69

.62
.61

.53
.58

.62
.65

.43
.44

.39
.39

.47
.56

.49
.49

.37
.45

.51
.69

.55
.56

.46
.36

.58
.70

.49
.49
.60
.38
.39
(J)

.42
.39
.39
.33
.35

.49
.51
.67
.41
.43

.61
.53
.63
.41
.44
(«)

0

.52
.41

.61
.57
.63
.64
.50

09

.67
.66
.60
.48
.53

(3)

.47
.52
.42
.37
.37
0

.68
.68
.61
.54
.56

.36
.39
.65
.38 ‘ .33
.47
.47
.34
.46
.55
09
.54
09

.46
.65
.45
.47
.49
.55
.56

.49
.50
.46
.60
.45
.63
.46

.31
.47
.36
.60
.42

.63
.50
.54
.64
.47
.63
.48

.47
.44
.54
.53
.68
.71
.54

.43
.34
.42
.43
.69
.36

.52
.47
.69
.53
.72
.71
.61

.41
.52

.40
.55

.41

.44

(3)

.37

.47

.47
.60

.34
.60

.50
.59

.59
.37
.51

0

Border States
500.000 population and over:
Baltimore......................................
Washington........... .......................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Norfolk..........................................
Richmond...................................

South
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Atlanta....................................................
Birmingham...........................................
Dallas......................................................
Houston..................................................
New Orleans. .........................................
San Antonio...........................................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Charlotte.................................................
Chattanooga............................................
Fort Worth.............................................
Jacksonville...........................................
Knoxville................................................
Miami.....................................................
Nashville.................................................
Oklahoma City.......................................
Tampa....................................................
Tulsa.......................................................

(3)

.30
.35
.41

Middle West
500,000 population and over:
Chicago...........................................
Milwaukee......................................
St. Louis.........................................
25010QQapd under 500,000 population:
mailhapolis....................................
Kansas City....................................
Minneapolis-St. Paul....................

See footnotes at end of table.




.67
.54
.50

.48

0
.40

.61
.37
.51

.89

.53

.90

.71

.76

.75
.58
.55

.65
.46
0

.76
.59
.55

.67
.54
.52

.84
.76
.62

09
09

.84
.76
.64

.81
.60
.62

0

.63

.82
.61
.63

.46

11
T able 2.— Average H ou rly Earnings 1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, b y M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Summer 1943 —Con.
Retail clerks—Continued
Female—Continued
Region and city

Hosiery, women's

Shoes

Women's clothing

All Tim e Incen­
All Tim e Incen­
All Tim e Incen­
tive work­
tive work­
tive
work­ work­ work­
work­ work­
work­ work­
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers
ers

Middle West—Continued
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Des Moines...................................
Duluth-Superior-........................
Fort W ayne..
Gary...............
Grand Rapids.
Peoria............
South B end...

$0.56
(3)
.46 $0.43
.54
.51
.50
.46
.48
(3)

.45

$0.59 $0.69
(3)
.49
.45 $0.37
.63
.51
.58
.51
.57
(3)
.47
.59
.48

$0.72 $0.55
.53
.51 $0.45
.60
.49
.57
.68
.45
*58
.62
.68
.56

.48

.37:
. 48

.47
.54

.56

.61
.78

57
77

.64
.78

(3)

.81

.76

(3)
.87

.68
.60

.64
.56

.71
.67

.67
.79

.57
.61

(3)

(3)

(3>

.40
.47

.53
.72

.73
.80

64
66

75
87

.75
.88

.85
.83

.61
.56

.88
.98

(3)

.86

.55

.91

."83

.'62

i.'l5

.58

.50
.66

$0.55
.57
.68
.71
.70

r

Mountain and Pacific
500.000 population and over:
Los Angeles...................................
San Francisco...............................
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Denver..........................................
Portland........................................
Seattle-Tacoma............................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Sacramento...................... ............
Salt Lake City..............................
San Diego......................................
Spokane.........................................

<3)
.54

.54

Nonselling occupations
Region and city

Female

Male

Bundle- Cashiers, Cashiers,
Stockmen wrappers
grade I a grade II*

Stock
girls

Northeast
500.000 population and over:
Boston................... ...................... .
Buffalo...........................................
New York......................................
Philadelphia..................................
Pittsburgh-...................................
250.000 and under 500,000 population:
Providence.....................................
Rochester.......................................
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Bridgeport................................... .
Fall River......................................
Hartford....................................... .
New Bedford.................................
New Haven.................................. .
Lowell............................................
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre.................
Springfield.....................................
Syracuse....................................... .
W orcester......................................... .

$0.50
.48
.57
.49
.55

$0.40
.37
.45
.43
.49

$0.49
.47
.61
.52
.53

$0.43
.42
.49
.46
.50

$0.41
.42
.47
.40
.46

.45
.61

.42
.39

.41
.52

.41
.42

.38
.42

.50
(3)
.54
.47
<3)
.39
.39
.41
.58
.42

.41
.38
.38

.48
.44
.56

.39

.32
.40
.36
.36

.53
.47
.39
.50
.45
.41

.46
.41
.50
.40
.43
.46
.36
.45
.37
.42

.48
.52

.39
.42

.48
.62

.43
.53

.33
.43

.46
.40

.36
.36

.48
.47

.48

.41
•28

(*)

.42
.39
.39
.47
<*)
(3)
.34

Border States
500.000 population and over:
Baltimore.......................................
Washington....... .......................... .
100.000 and under 250,000 population:
Norfolk........ *...............................
Richmond......................................

See footnotes at end of table.




(»)

A

12

T able 2.— Average H ou rly Earningg1 in Selected Job Classifications in Department and
Clothing Stores, b y M ethod o f W age Paym ent, Spring and Sum m er 1943 —Con.
Nonselling occupations
Region and city

Male

Female

Bundle- Cashiers, Cashiers,
Stockmen wrappers
grade I 2 grade I I 2

Stock
girls

South
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Atlanta............................................................ .
Birmingham...........................................................
Dallas......................................................................
Houston..................................................................
New Orleans...........................................................
San Antonio............................................................
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Charlotte.................................... - ..........................
Chattanooga......... >................... ...........................
Fort W orth............................................................
Jacksonville_________________________________
Knoxville. ........................................................... ...
Miami__________ _______ ____________________
Nashville.................................................................
Oklahoma City.......... ...........................................
Tampa______________________________________
Tulsa.......................................................................

$0.40
.41
.40
.36
.44
.49

$0.35
.29
.37
.32
.35
.27

$0.50
.44
.51
.45
.45
.42

$0.39
.38
.42
.36
.37
.35

$0.33
.28
.35
.33
.37
.27

.41
.31
.34
.43
.31
.54
.33
.49
.38
.48

.31
.26
.38
.34

.38
.34
.37

.30
.28
.28

.40
.30
.35
.35
.54

.38
.45
.52
.45
.54
.49
.41
.47
.47
.57

.37
.38
.40
.52

.55
.57
.51

.44
.44
.39

.55
.53
.50

.51
.48
.41

.45
.40
.37

.51
.60
.56

.43
.36
.41

.52
.51
.49

.47
.42
.43

.45
.36
.40

.47
.52
.46
.51
.39
.43
.59

.43
.45
.42
(3)
.41
.33
.39

.47
.60
.49
.50
.50
.46
.52

,43
.44
.51
.47
.47
.41
.40
.45

.65
.81

.54
.62

.70
.71

.56
.61

.50
.55

.49
.67
.61

.38
.50
.56

.39
.54
.63

(3)
.45
.61

.38
.48
.58

.55
.44
.55

.61
.50
.68
.55

.58

.47

.57
.53

.50

(8)

.34

(3)
(3)

.47
.31
.37
.37

Middle West
500,000 population and over:
Chicago................. ................................................
Milwaukee..............................................................
St. Louis.................................................................
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Indianapolis............................................................
Kansas City............................................................
M inneapolis-St. Paul.................................................
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Des Moines_____ _____ _______________________
Duluth-Superior....................................................
Flint........................ .............................................
Fort Wayne............................................................
Gary.................. ....................................................
Grand Rapids___1.................................................
Peoria........................... : .............. .........................
South Bend.............................................................

.39
(*)

.36
.41
.41

Mi
.44

Mountain and Pacific
500,000 population and over:
Los Angeles............................................................
San Francisco.........................................................
250,000 and under 500,000 population:
Denver...................................................................
Portland.................................................................
Seattle-Tacoma......................................................
100,000 and under 250,000 population:
Sacramento
______________________________
Salt Lake C ity .................................... ..................
San Diego................................................................
Spokane................................................ ..................

.53
.52
.47

1 Exclusive of premium pay for overtime or late-shift work.
2 In general, the cashier, grade I, accepts payments on charge accounts, cashes customers' checks, and
sells gift certificates besides assuming, whenever necessary, the duties of the cashier, grade II, who accepts
payment for sales slips made out by clerks, makes change, and may also wrap packages.
3Insufficient information to justify presentation.




U. S . GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : M 4 4