The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Union Wages and Hours: Local-Transit Operating Employees July 1, 1967 and Trend 1929-67 Bulletin No. 1589 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Union Wages and Hours: Local-Transit Operating Employees July 1, 1967 and Trend 1929-67 Bulletin No. 1589 April 1968 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Willard Wirtz, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Arthur M. Ross, Commissioner For sale b y the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D .C . 20402 - Price 15 cents Preface The Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts annual surveys of wage rates and scheduled hours of work for specified crafts or jobs as provided in labor-m anagem ent agreem ents in f o u r industries: Building construction, printing, local tran sit, and local trucking. The studies present the wage rates in effect as of July 1, of each year, as reported to the Bureau by the appropriate local labor organizations in each of the cities included in the survey. Information on the union scales and hours p re vailing in each city is available in October of each year on request to the Bureau's regional offices as shown on the inside back cover. A relea se sum m arizing the rates for lo c a l-tr a n sit operating em ployees on a nationwide basis was issued in Novem ber 1967. This analysis provides additional data and indexes of the trend of wages and hours for 1 9 2 9 -6 7 . This study was conducted in the Bureau's Office of W ages and Industrial Relations. The bulletin was p re pared by Thomas C. M obley, under the general supervision of Alvin Bauman. iii Contents Page Summary_______________________________________________________________ Scope and method of study______________________________________________________ 1 1 Tables: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Indexes of union hourly wage rates of local-transit operating employees, 1929—67 _________________________________________ Average union hourly wage rates of local-transit operating* employees, July 1, 1967, and increase in rates, July 1, 19 66—July 1, 1967______________________________________________ Percent changes in union hourly wage rates and percent of local-transit operating employees affected, July 1, 1966—July 1, 1967_____________________________________________ 1 Cents-per-hour changes in union hourly wage rates and percent of local-transit operating employees affected, July 1, 1966—July1, 1967_______________________________________________ Distribution of union operating employees in the local-transit industry by hourly wage rates, July 1, 1967___________________________ Average union hourly wage rates of local-transit operating employees by city and population group, July 1, 1967_____ ___________ Average union hourly wage rates of local-transit operating employees by region, July 1, 1967_____________________________________ 8. D istrib u tio n o f union lo c a l-t r a n s it o p era tin g e m p lo y e e s 9. by standard weekly hours, July 1, 1967________________________________ Union scales of wages and hours for local-transit operating employees, July 1, 1966, and July 1, 1967____________________________ iv 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Union Wages and Hours: Local-Transit Operating Employees, July 1, 1967 Summary percent of the operators, averaged 40.2 hours on July 1, 1967, the same as a year earlier. A scheduled straight-time workweek of 40 hours, which was in effect in about 4 of every 5 cities reporting such workweeks, applied to 7 of every 8 operators of surface equipment and to all operators of elevated and subway equipment. Hourly wage scales of unionized localtransit operating employees averaged $3.22 on July 1, 1967, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics annual survey of such scales in cities of 100, 000 population or more. Hourly scales averaged $3.18 for operators of surface equipment, who accounted for about 90 percent of all the workers covered by the survey, and $3.57 for operators of elevated and subway equipment. All but 5 percent of the local-transit operating employees were covered by con tracts which provided for health, insurance, and pension plans financed either entirely or in part by the employer. Health and insur ance plans financed entirely by the employer covered slightly more than one-half the work ers; pension plans so financed covered about three-fifths. All but 6 percent of the operating em ployees had scales of at least $2.50 an hour. Hourly scales of $2.50 to $3 were in effect for one-fifth of the workers, $3 to $3.50 for almost one-half, and $3.50 or more for slightly more than one-fourth. Among oper ators of surface equipment, scales ranged from $3 to $3.50 an hour for almost onehalf, and $3.50 or more for one-fourth. Hourly scales of elevated and subway oper ators were more concentrated. One-third were about evenly divided among three inter vals: $3 to $3.20, $3.20 to $3.30, and $3.30 to $3.40. Nearly three-tenths had scales be tween $3.40 and $3.50; rates of $3.50 or more were in effect for about two-fifths of the operators. Scope and Method of Study Union scales in this bulletin are those scales agreed on through collective bargain ing between trade unions and employers, and are defined as (1) the basic (minimum) wage scales (excluding holiday, vacation, or other benefit payments regularly made or credited to the worker each pay period), and (2) the maximum schedules of hours at straight-time rates. Rates exceeding the negotiated mini mum, which may be paid for special quali fications or other reasons are not included. The average scale advanced 6.8 percent during the year ending July 1, 1967, and brought the Bureau's index of such scales to 146.6 (1957—59 = 100). This was the largest relative increase since July 1, 1952. The 20-cent increase in the average was the larg est cents-per-hour increase recorded since 1929, when these surveys began. Upward scale adjustments, primarily resulting from either newly negotiated collective bargaining agreements or deferred increases negotiated earlier, were received by 97 percent of the workers. One-tenth received increases of less than 3 percent; one-fourth each had scale advances of 3 to 5 percent and 5 to 7 per cent; more than one-fourth had their scales increased 11 to 12 percent. For operators of surface cars and buses, the average scale rose 6.3 percent, or 19 cents an hour. For elevated and subway operators the increase was 10.6 percent, or 34 cents an hour. The information presented in this bulletin was based on union scales in effect on July 1, 1967, and covered approximately 64,000 localtransit operating employees in 67 cities that had populations of 100, 000 or more. Track men and maintenance workers were excluded from the study. Operating employees of mu nicipally owned transit systems were in cluded, if unions acted as the bargaining agents. Data were obtained primarily from local union officials by mail questionnaire; in some instances, Bureau representatives visited local union officials to obtain the desired information. The current survey was designed to re flect union wage scales of local-transit oper ating employees in all cities of 100, 000 pop ulation or more (excluding Honolulu). All cities that had 500, 000 population or more were included, as were most cities in the 250, 000—500, 000 group. The cities in the 100, 000—250, 000 group selected for study were distributed widely throughout the United Straight-time w e e k l y work schedules were reported for surface equipment oper ators in 52 of the 67 cities included in the survey. These schedules, applicable to 92 1 2 States. Data for some cities were weighted to compensate for cities not surveyed. To provide appropriate representation in th e combination of data, each geographic region was considered separately when city weights were assigned. In addition to data for the 67 cities sur veyed, table 9 contains information on wage and hour scales in cities which were within the scope of the survey but were not studied. This information, obtained from secondary sources, was not used in any of the other tables. Average hourly scales, designed to show current levels, were based on all scales re ported in effect on July 1, 1967. Individual scales were weighted by the number of union members at each rate. These averages are not designed for precise year-to-year com parisons because of fluctuations in member ship and in the classifications studied. Aver age cents-per-hour and percent changes from July 1, 1966, to July 1, 1967, however, were based on comparable quotations for the vari ous classifications in both periods, weighted by the membership reported for the current (1967) survey. The index series, designed for trend purposes, was constructed similarly. 3 T a b le 1. I n d e x e s o f U n ion H o u rly W age R a te s o f L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e r a tin g E m p lo y e e s , 1929—67 (1957-59-100)_____________________________________________ In d ex D a te 19 3 1 ; 19 3 2 * M ay 15 1933; M ay 1 5 _______ M ?y 15 . _ .... ............... . . . . . . . . . . M ay 15 1 IQ 3A - May M ay 15 15 19 3 7 . 193«- M ? y 15 June. 1 1939‘ Tuno 1 ....................................... 1 Q 4 .1 • Tnnp 1 10421Q 43- Till y T u ly 1 1 J ^ ly 1 1945: J u ly 1- 1946: 19 4 7 . J u ly r w 1 1 9 4 ft- rv t _. _____ _______ 1934; 1944- _ _ ... . . . . . . ____ ______ _____ . . ... _ ____ . . . . . . . ... ______ _______ .. ... ... . . ............ ....................................... _______ . .................................................................................................................... ------------- - 1 1 ------------------- -------------------------. __ _ ............ . . . . . . 3 2 .7 33. 0 1Q 4Q iQ f t n - O rt r w 1 1 33. 0 1Q 51- O rt. 1 ____________ 3 2 .4 IQ 5 2 - O rt. 1Q 53- T u ly 1 (* ) 3 1 .5 In d ex D a te 66. 1 . . . . . ....................................... 1 . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . ... . . . _ . _ 69- 2 73. 8 _____ 79. 3 ... . . . ... __ 81. 1 1 9 54r J u ly 1 _________ 32. 6 1 O S '!- T u ly 1 ____ 3 2 .9 1Q A A - T u ly 1 34. 5 1Q A7- J u ly 1 35. 5 1Q R8; T u ly 1 . 3 5 .7 1Q 5Q - T u ly 1 .......................... 36. 1 I9 6 0 - J u ly 1 ......................... 37. 5 1Q A 1- T u ly 1 40. 2 42. 8 1Q A2- J u ly 1 1Q A3- T illy 1 43. 1 1 Q A 4- T u ly 1 ........................... 1965: 1 QA A - J u ly J u ly 1 ____________________________________________________________________ 1 ...... .. . 1 3 1 .7 5 7 .7 63. 5 19A 7t J u ly 1 ____________ 146. 6 85. 1 ................. ........ _ ... ....... ........... .. 87. 6 _ _______________ . . . ... _ _____ ... _ . 91. 1 .. ..................................... ... _ _ .. 94. 9 ____ 10 0 . 6 104. 4 _ __________ . . . . ._ 108. 4 ............... _ ................ 112. 5 ..................... . ... _____ _______ ... .. _____ 117. 1 121. 5 . 126. 4 4 3 .6 51. 1 _ ____ 137. 3 ________ Inform ation not a va ila ble. Table 2. A verage Union Hourly Wage Rates o f L o ca l-T r a n s it Operating E m p loy ees, July 1, 1967, and Increase in Rates, July 1, 1966—July 1, 1967 C la ssifica tion July 1, 1967, average hourly rate In crease ov er July 1, 1966 P ercen t Cents per hour A ll lo c a l-tr a n s it operating e m p lo y e e s ------------------------- $3. 22 6. 8 20 O perators o f su rfa ce ca rs and buses — — ---------------Elevated and subway op era tors _ - ____ — -------- . $3. 18 3. 57 6. 3 10 . 6 19 34 Table 3. P ercen t Changes in Union Hourly Wage Rates and P ercen t o f L o ca l-T r a n s it Operating E m p loyees A ffected , July 1, 1966—July 1, 1967 P ercen t of— O perators of surfa ce ca rs and buses Elevated and subway op erators Change in hourly rates A ll w orkers No ch a n g e----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I n c r e a s e — --------- ------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- 2 .9 97. 1 96 . 8 100 . 0 Under 2 p e r c e n t .. . . . -------- --------_ ------ -a. ---- 2 and under 3 percent----------------------------------------------------------------3 and under 4 percen t_____________________ ______________________ 4 and under 5 percent___________________________________________ 5 and under 6 percen t_________________—------------------------------------and under 7 percent ----- - . . . . . . ------------ 7 and under 8 percen t___________________________________________ 8 and under 9 percent _ ------- . . . . _. ____ . 9 and under 10 p e r ce n t--------------------------------------------------------------10 and under 11 percent-------------------------------------------------------------11 and under 12 percent-------------------------------------------------------------12 percent and ov er 3 .9 7. 1 18. 5 6. 1 16 . 1 4. 2 7 .9 1. 0 20 . 6 6.8 17. 8 .4 1. 3 10 . 0 3. 0 84. 2 6 NOTE: Because o f rounding, 8.6 2. 2 2. 5 .7 4 .2 2 6.7 .7 sum s o f individual percentages m ay not equal totals. 3. 2 8. 4 2 .4 2. 5 .8 4 .7 20 . 0 .8 4 Table 4. C en ts -P er-H ou r Changes in Union Hourly Wage Rates and P ercen t of L o ca l-T r a n s it Operating E m ployees A ffected , i July 1, 1966—July 1, 1967 P ercen t of— Change in hourly rates No change In crease- _____ _________ _ _____ __ ______ A ll w orkers 2 .9 97. 1 ___ ------------------------------------------ ---- ------ — Under 6 cents 6 and under 7 cen ts------------------------ ----------- --------- ------- — __ 7 and under 8 cents — -------- ----------------- -------------8 and under 9 cents ____ ___ ___________ — --- ------ ------- — 9 and under 10 cents ________________________ ___________ ____ -------------- 10 and under 11 cents --------- -------- ----------- 11 and under 12 cen ts_________ ____ — ------- ------- — - — 12 and under 14 cen ts___________________________________________ 14 and under 16 cen ts— ------------ ------------ — — ----------------- — 16 and under 18 cents ------------------------ — -------------------------------_____ — -----18 and under 20 cen ts— _______ ______ 20 and under 25 cents - -------------- ----------------------- — — — 25 and under 30 cen ts------------ ------- -------- — ----------- ------ — 30 and under 35 cen ts-------------------------------- ---------------------- — — 35 cents and over NOTE: Because o f rounding, Table 5. 2. 2 5. 0 1 .2 4. 5 5. 3 6. 4 2. 3 9. 6 6. 3 .9 9 .7 11.9 .7 9 .0 2 1.9 O perators of surfa ce ca rs and buses Elevated and subway opera tors 3. 2 100 . 0 96 . 8 . 2. 5 5. 5 1.4 5. 1 5. 9 7. 1 2. 6 10. 7 6 .9 1. 0 10 . 8 11. 8 .8 4. 5 20 . 2 1. 0 - .4 1. 3 - 13. 0 - 47. 8 36. 4 sum s of individual percentages m ay not equal totals. D istribution o f Union Operating E m ployees in the L o ca l-T r a n s it Industry by Hourly Wage Rates, July 1, 1967 P ercen t of— Hourly wage rates Und°r 4.0 7 4 0 a r»H nnrlor ^ ?. SO ___ A ll w orkers _ _ _ _ _ ___ _____ ___________ $ 3. 00 and under $ 3. 10-----------------------------------— 1 0 anH nnHpr i V ?.n S 4 0 a nH nnHr»r<fl3_S0 S SO a nr? n v p r ... . NOTE: Because of rounding, — ___ ._ .................. _____ _ ... _ - 4. 3 1.4 3. 6 3. 4 4. 1 6. 6 2. 1 7. 8 12. 5 8. 8 4. 8 13. 3 27. 3 sum s of individual percentages m ay not equal 100. O perators of surface ca rs and buses Elevated and subway opera tors 4. 8 1.6 4. 0 3. 8 4. 5 7 .4 2. 3 8. 5 12 . 9 8. 5 4. 0 11.5 26. 2 1.3 9. 6 1 1.4 1 1 .6 28. 9 37. 2 5 T a b le 6. A v e r a g e U n ion H o u r ly W ag e R a te s o f L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e ra tin g E m p lo y e e s b y C ity and P o p u la tio n G ro u p , J u ly 1, A verage hourly rate City and population group Average hourly rate City and population group Population group III (250, 000 to 500, 000)— Continued Population group I ( l , 000, 000 o r m ore): New York, N. Y________________________ $3. 70 A verage fo r group I — 3. 51 C hicago, 111L os A ngeles, C a lif D etroit, M ich ______ Philadelphia, Pa —__ 3.41 3. 25 3. 17 3. 11 Population group II (500, 000 to 1, 000, 000): San F ra n cisco —Oakland, C a l i f Boston, M a s s . P ittsburgh, Pa----Washington, D. C— Seattle, W ash____ 3. 65 3. 54 3.47 3. 36 3. 30 A v erage for group I I - 3. 25 C leveland, O h io__ Milwaukee, W is __ B a ltim ore, Md___ St. L ouis, Mo-----San D iego, C a lif— New O rleans, L a Buffalo, N. Y _____ Cincinnati, Ohio— Houston, T ex-------D allas, T ex_______ San Antonio, T ex— 3. 25 3. 24 3. 13 3. 09 3. 04 2 .9 5 2 .8 3 2 . 81 2 . 68 2 . 60 2. 36 Population group III (250, 000 to 500, 000): Newark, N. J ---------------------M inneapolis—St. Paul, Min Portland, O r e g ____________ Denver, C olo_____ _________ 3. 3. 3. 2. Average fo r group III — 2. 87 Colum bus, O h io Kansas City, M o . T oled o, O h io------Dayton, O h io _____ 2 .87 2. 85 2. 83 2 . 81 Table 7. 1967 17 05 00 88 R och ester, N. Y Omaha, Nebr .. . .. . . . . . . Atlanta, Ga — . . . . — -----Indianapolis, Ind--------------------------------------------------------------L ou isville, Ky — . . . — M em phis, Tenn . . . .. . . . . Birm ingham , A la -------------------------------------------------------------N orfolk, Va — . . . . — Tampa, Fla — . . . . — -----_ Phoenix, A r iz __ . _____ . . . . . Tulsa, Okla—_____________________________________________ Oklahoma City, Okla--------------------------------------------------------- $2.7 8 2 .7 6 2 .7 4 2.71 2.68 2 .67 2 .6 2 2. 50 2 .4 6 2 .37 2 .2 5 2 .2 0 P opulation group IV (100, 000 to 250, 000)‘> F resn o, C a lif— — — Sacram ento, C a lif---------------------------------- ------------------------Albuquerque, N. M ex— — — ---New Haven, Conn — -------- —-------------------------------------------- — Trenton, N. J--------. . . — . . . Des M oines, Iowa----------------------------------------------------------- — Syracuse, N. Y — — ----------P rov id en ce, R. I.-----------------------------. . . . . --------M adison, W is -------- -------------. . . ------------------------------ ----------- 3.27 3. 07 3 .0 3 3. 01 2.91 2 . 81 2 .8 0 2 .7 0 2 .6 9 A verage fo r group IV — ---------------------------------------------------- 2 .6 5 P e o ria , 111 Springfield, M a ss------------------------------------- ------------------------ 2 .5 7 2. 55 2. 54 2. 50 2. 50 2 .4 8 2 .4 6 2 .4 2 2. 37 2. 35 2. 32 2 .2 9 2. 15 2. 14 2 . 10 1.95 1.93 Jacksonville, Fla — - — - — Richm ond, Va-------- —---------------------------- —-------- ------------- — Spokane, Wash____________________________________________ South Bend, Ind ___Grand Rapids, M ich .-------------------------------------------- — -------Salt Lake City, Utah------—--------------------------—----------------- Shreveport, L a ............................................................................... Little Rock, A r k — - — . . . . Jackson, M i s s ------------------------- -------- --------------------------------E vansville, Ind----------------------------------------------------------------Charlotte, N. C — — Scranton, P a ___________ — -----------------------------------------------K noxville, T enn---------------------------------------- —-------------- ---- Topeka, Kans ________________________ — --- ----------—----------- A verage Union Hourly Wage Rates o f L o ca l-T r a n s it Operating E m ployees by Region, 1 July 1, 1967 A vera g e rate per hour R egion 1 United States — ------ — All w orkers --------- - New England--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----M iddle Atlantic — ---- ------ — . . . . ---B order States . ______ ______ ,_.-r.................................... Southea st Great L a k e s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Middle West _____ . _____ __ Southwest— -----------------------— — . _ Mountain ......,_____________ .___ _____ ■-., ._____________________ T— P a c ific — — — -------- --. ----- O perators o f su rfa ce ca rs and buses Eflevated and subway opera tors $ 3.22 $3. 18 $3. 57 $ 3.23 3 .4 6 3. 09 2 .4 8 3. 17 2 .9 5 2 .5 9 2 .7 5 3 .3 5 $3. 20 3 .4 2 3. 09 2 .4 8 3. 16 2 .9 5 2 .5 9 2 .7 5 3 .3 5 $3.4 5 3 .6 4 3 .29 - . 1 The regions used in this study include: ‘‘New England— Connecticut, Maine, M assachusetts, New H am pshire, Rhode Island, and Verm ont; M iddle A tlantic— New J ersey , New Y ork, and Pennsylvania; B ord er States— D elaw are, D istrict o f Colum bia, Kentucky, M aryland, V irgin ia, and West V irginia; Southeast— Alabam a, F lorid a , G eorgia, M ississ ip p i, North Carolina, South C a rolina, and T ennessee; G reat L ak es— Illin ois, Indiana, M ichigan, M innesota, Ohio, and W isconsin; Middle W est— Iowa, K ansas, M issou ri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota; Southw est— A rkan sas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texirs; Mountain-— A rizon a , Idaho, C olora do, Montana, New M exico, Utah, and Wyoming; and P a c ific — A laska. C aliforn ia , Nevada, O regon, and Washington. Hawaii was excluded from the survey. 6 T a b le 8. D is tr ib u tio n o f U nion L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e r a tin g E m p lo y e e s b y S ta n d a rd W e e k ly H o u r s , J u ly 1, 1987 Elevated and subway opera tors O perators o f su rfa ce ca rs and buses A ll w ork ers W eekly hours A v erage w eekly h o u r s ____________________ ___________________ 40. 2 40. 2 40. 0 T otal reporting standard hours ---- — —-------- — ________ ____ — ------------------------ — --------- --40 hours O ver 40 and tinder 44 h ou rs. . . . . ___ . . ___ . ___ . 44 and under 48 h o u r s ___________________________________________ 48 hours and o v e r ______ ____ ____ ___________ __ ____ _____ P ercen t reporting no standard h o u r s ... ____ _________ ______ . 92 . 0 88 . 1 91. 1 8 6.7 1. 5 2. 3 .6 8 .9 100.0 100 . 0 NOTE: 1. 3 2. 0 . 5 8.0 - B ecause o f rounding, sum s o f individual percentages m ay not equal totals. Table 9. Union S cales o f Wages and Hours for L o ca l-T r a n s it Operating E m p loy ees, July 1, 1966, and July 1, 1967 (Hours are the sam e fo r both years unless otherw ise indicated) July 1, July X 1967 1966 Rate Rate Hours City and cla s sifica tion per P** , hear week 1 hoar City and cla s sifica tion July 1, 1966 Rate per hour July 1. 1967 Rate per hour Hours per week1 BEAUM ONT, T E X . 2 AKRON, OHIO 2 B uses: $2.560 2. 590 2.610 $2,6 60 2 . 690 2 .710 40 40 40 Buses: Beginning E xperien ced 2 _ _ _ .. . ......... . $ 1 . 800 1.850 $ 1,850 1.900 _ 3. 260 3. 310 3.460 3.510 40 40 2.4 7 0 2. 490 2. 520 2 .570 2. 590 2.620 40 40 40 3.040 3. 160 3. 195 3. 243 3. 340 3. 250 3. 370 3. 405 3.453 3.550 40 40 40 40 40 3. 160 3. 283 3.315 3. 360 3.458 3. 370 3.493 3.525 3. 570 3.668 40 40 40 40 40 2 .9 18 3. 040 3.078 3. 123 3. 223 3. 128 3. 250 3. 288 3. 333 3.433 40 40 40 40 40 3. 283 3. 340 3 .493 3. 550 40 40 3. 063 3. 123 3. 273 3. 333 40 40 2 .460 2 .490 2. 530 2. 530 2. 560 2 .600 40 40 40 2.700 2. 730 2.7 5 0 2.7 8 0 2.8 1 0 2.830 40 40 40 BER K E LE Y, C A L IF . 2 A L BAN Y, N. Y . 2 f i r s t 3 mnnths 4—ft m onths _ 7—q m onths................ After 9 months.. ............... . ... .. . 2. 330 2. 390 2.420 2 .450 2.410 2.470 2. 500 2.530 40 40 40 40 _ . 4—S yea rs .. After A years — ............... . 2 . 279 2. 364 2. 533 2.639 2. 724 .................... ..... 2. 530 2 .620 2. 700 2.810 3.030 _ _ Buses* . . .. ............ . 2. 330 2. 380 2.430 2.450 2. 500 2. 550 40 40 40 2.850 2.950 3. 150 3. 250 40 40 ANAHEIM, CA L IF . 2 B uses: F ir s t year Aftpr 1 ypar ... _______ .. A T L A N T A , GA. F ir s t ft m onths 7—17. m onths . . _ — .. . . months m onths ... 2. 530 2. 590 2.630 2. 640 2. 700 2.740 _ _ _ AUSTIN, T E X . 2 . ...... BIRMINGHAM, A L A . --_ .... ---------............... BOSTON, MASS. 1 -m an ca r s and buses: F ir s t 3 m onths ALLENTO W N, P A . 2 7—17. m onths ft ft Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths 7—12 months ALBUQUERQUE, N. M EX. B uses: F ir s t year Buses: F ir s t A fter . . 7—9 months .. 10—12 m onths. A fter 1 y ear ... P. C .C . su rfa ce lines o p era tors: F ir s t 3 m onths __________ _______ A fter 1 y ear . .......... _ Rapid transit lin es: Guards: F ir st 3 months . .............. ............... .. 7—Q months 10—12 m on ths--------------------------------------------A fter 1 y ear .... _ _ Mo tor m en: Road .......... Y a r d ____ - - ___ ______ _ — _ __ _ P latform m en: W arders . _.... ___________ Gatemen _________ B uses: 1.930 2 . 000 2 .030 2 . 100 _ 1 -m an c a r s and buses: F ir s t ft m onths A fter 1 y ear . .. . _ . ........ _ BRID G EPORT, CONN. 2 Buses: F ir s t 3 m onths___ 4—12 months B ALTIM O RE, MD. _.irl .............. . 2 .905 2.955 3.005 3.025 3.075 3. 125 _ - 40 40 40 BU FF AL O , N. Y. BATON ROUGE, L A . 2 2.000 2 . 100 S e e f o o t n o t e s a t end o f ta b le. *2. 040 42 . 140 _ _ Buses: F ir s t 3 m o n t h s _____ _ 4—12 months ...... A fter 1 year .. _ _ _ _ .............. 7 T a b le 9 . U n ion S c a le s o f W a g e s and H o u rs f o r L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e r a tin g E m p lo y e e s , J u ly 1, 19 6 6 , and J u ly 1, 1967— C on tin u ed July 1, 1966 City and cla s sifica tion Rate per hour July 1, 1966 July 1, 1967 Rate per hour City and cla s sifica tion Hours per week1 CAMBRIDGE, MASS. 2 Rate per hour July 1, 1967 Rate per hour CLEVELAN D, OHIO— Continued 1 -m an ca rs and buses: $ 3.040 F ir s t 3 months 3.160 4—6 m onths. _ ___ 3.195 _ 7—9 m onths_ 3.243 10—12 months _ A fter 1 y e a r ___________________________________ 3.340 P .C .C . surfa ce lines op era tors: 3.160 F ir s t 3 months — —_ 3.283 3.315 7—9 m onths10—12 m onths__ — __ 3.360 A fter 1 year — 3.458 Rapid transit lines: Guards: 2.918 F ir s t 3 m onths_ _ _ _ — 3.040 4—6 months 3.078 7—9 months - - - - 3.123 10—12 months _ _ — _ 3.223 A fter 1 y e a r -----------------------------------------------M otorm en: R oa d - _ 3.283 Yard — ___ 3.340 P la tform m en: 3.063 W arders __ _ — Gatem en ____________________________________ 3.123 $3,250 3.370 3.405 3.453 3.550 40 40 40 40 40 3.370 3.493 3.525 3.570 3.668 40 40 40 40 40 3.128 3.250 3.288 3.333 3.433 40 40 40 40 40 3.493 3.550 40 40 3.273 3.333 40 40 CAMDEN, N.J. 2 Rapid transit— T rainm en: F ir s t 3 m onths— _ 4—12 m onths---------------------------- ------- — --------A fter 1 y e a r ------------------------------------------------- 2.900 2.840 2.930 3.020 3.110 2.990 3.080 3.170 40 40 40 40 2.390 2.440 2.470 2.520 48 48 CANTON, OHIO 2 $ 2.870 2.900 2.980 $ 2.960 3.060 3.160 40 40 40 1.540 1.600 4 1.540 4 1.600 - 2.680 2.730 2.780 2.770 2.820 2.870 40 40 40 2.420 2.500 2.520 2.600 - 2.630 2.680 2.730 2.710 2.760 2.810 40 40 40 2.350 2.400 2.450 2.500 2.400 2.450 2.500 2.550 - - 2.610 2.620 2.630 2.640 2.650 2.840 2.850 2.860 2.870 2.880 40 40 40 40 40 2.580 2.610 2.660 2.730 2.760 2.810 40 40 40 3.070 3.120 3.170 3.270 4 3.070 4 3.120 4 3.170 4 3.270 40 40 40 40 2.340 2.410 2.480 2.370 2.440 2.510 40 40 40 2.840 2.930 3.020 3.110 2.990 3.080 3.170 2.900 40 40 40 40 COLUMBUS, GA . 2 Buses: E x p e r ie n c e d 3 ----------------------------------------------COLUMBUS, OHIO Buses and tro lle y coa ch es: F ir s t 26 w eeks---------------------------------------- — 27—52 w e e k s __________________________. . . . . . . A fter 1 y e a r ___________ —___________________ D ALLAS, T EX. B uses: F ir s t year — — A fter 1 y e a r ______________________ ____ _— — B uses: F ir s t 6 m onths— DEARBORN, MICH. 2 B uses: F ir s t 4 months 5—8 months 9—12 m o n t h s __ _ — B uses: - — CH ARLOTTE, N.C. B u ses: F ir s t 2 months - — _ 3—6 months A fter 6 m onths________________________________ 1.940 1.990 2.040 2.040 2.090 2.140 - B uses: E x p e r ie n c e d 3 _________________________________ 2.180 2.300 2.260 2.380 - B uses and tro lle y coa ch es: F ir s t 3 m onths--------------------------------------------4—12 m onths----------------------------- ----------------—13—18 months 19—24 months A fter 2 years 3.175 3.205 3.360 3.390 40 40 DES MOINES, IOWA B uses: F ir s t 3 m onths4—12 months A fter 1 year _______ _______ A fter 1 year: Days Nights— b efore 2 a .m --------------------------------Nights— after 2 a .m _____________________ __ Elevated and subway railw ays: M otorm en (r e g u la r)___________________________ M otorm en (extra): F ir st 3 m onths________________—— —— ___ — 4—12 months —— ——— —------— — ----------------A fter 1 y e a r _______________________________ C onductors (regular) C onductors (extra): F ir s t year— - — A fter 1 y e a r ------------------- ---------------------------Guards (extra ): F ir s t 3 m onths_____________________________ 4—12 m onths_______________________________ A fter 1 year 3.225 3.255 3.275 3.410 3.440 3.460 40 40 40 3.166 3.351 40 3.112 3.121 3.166 3.096 3.293 3.306 3.351 3.311 40 40 40 40 3.078 3.096 3.258 3.311 40 40 3.050 3.060 3.069 3.110 3.120 3.284 40 40 40 B uses: F ir s t 6 m onths---- ----------------7—12 m onths — A fter 1 year — Night----- — -------------------— — DULUTH, MINN . 2 B uses: F ir s t 90 days Q l— 1 8 0 d a y s -------- _ _ _ A fter 180 days E L IZABET H , N .J . 2 B uses: F ir s t 4 months 5—8 months 9“ 12 m o n t h s ..............., ___________________ _ _ A fter 1 y e a r --------------------------------------- ---- ----E L PASO, T E X . 2 R e g in n in g ... . .............. E x p e r ie n c e d 3 2.530 2.580 2.630 2.680 2.730 2.610 2.660 2.710 2.760 2.810 2.130 2.280 2.200 2.350 - 2.440 2.510 2.540 2.440 2.510 2.540 40 40 40 1.800 1.870 1.950 2.000 5 44 5 44 5 44 ERIE, P A . 40 40 40 40 40 B uses: F ir s t 6 months 7—12 m o n t h s ---------A fter 1 y e a r - 40 40 40 B uses: F ir s t 6 m onths7—12 months A fter 1 y e a r - . ........ ....... _ ___ EVANSVILLE, IND. CLEVELAND, OHIO Buses and tro lle y coa ch es: F ir s t 3 months 4—12 months _ __ A fter 1 y e a r ----------------------------------------------------- — B uses: CINCINNATI, OHIO B uses: F ir s t 6 months __ _ 7—12 months — 13—18 months 19—24 months A fter 2 y ears__________________________________ S e e f o o t n o t e s at en d o f ta b le , _ D ETROIT, MICH. CHICAGO, ILL. B uses: F ir s t 3 mnntVis . - DENVER, COLO. - CHATTANOOGA, TENN. 2 - DAYTON, OHIO A fter 1 y e a r -----------—— -----------—— -----------— B uses: F ir s t 4 m onths------— — — -----— ——— —— —— — 6—8 months __ _ - _ 9—12 m on th s-. A fter 1 y e a r ___________________________________ E x p e r ie n c e d 3 Hours per week 1 2.970 3.000 3.020 3.060 3.160 3.260 — — ____ 2.070 2.150 8 T a b le 9. U n ion S c a le s o f W a g e s and H o u rs f o r L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e ra tin g E m p lo y e e s , J u ly 1, 1966, and J u ly 1, 1967— C on tin u ed July 1, 1966 Rate per hour City and cla s sific a tio n July 1, 1967 Rate per hour Hours f** week 1 FLIN T, MICH .2 City and cla s sific a tio n July 1, 1966 Rate per hour Rate per hour $ 2.310 2.360 2.410 $2,4 00 2.450 2.500 40 40 40 2.840 2.930 3.020 3.110 2.900 2.990 3.080 3.170 40 40 40 40 2.695 2.715 2.735 2.750 2.795 2.815 2.835 2.850 40 40 40 40 2.695 2.715 2.735 2.750 2.795 2.815 2.835 2.850 40 40 40 40 1.650 1.700 1.750 1.850 644 644 644 2.000 2.000 1.850 1.900 1.950 July 1, 1967 Hours per week 1 JACKSONVILLE, F L A . B uses; $2,3 10 2.340 $2,390 2.420 4 i ;/4 41V4 F O R T WAYNE, IND .2 B uses: F ir s t 3 months.. 4—A months After 6 months . .. .. ................. . . . . . JERSEY CITY, N .J . 2 B uses: 2.240 2.290 2.340 2.290 2.340 2.390 40 40 40 F O R T WORTH, T E X .2 1.910 1.970 2.020 .......... ....... . ....... KANSAS CITY, KANS. 2 B uses: 1.960 B uses; F ir s t 4 months 5—8 months 9—12 m on th s....... After 1 y e a r ....................... _ FRESNO, CALIF. B uses: F ir s t 4 m onths............. ........ 5—8 m onths _ .. ...... . _ .... .. B uses; 2.684 2.753 2.823 2.892 2.961 2.690 2.830 2.970 3.120 3.270 40 40 40 40 40 KANSAS CITY, MO. B uses: F ir s t 4 months _ 9—12 m onths . After 1 year GARY. IND .2 __.... _____ __ ............... . B uses: 2.400 2.550 2.620 2.720 40 40 G LEND ALE, C A L IF .2 Buses* F ir s t y e a r _ . A fter 1 y ear _ ........_ ......... _____ K NOXVILLE, TENN. B uses: F ir s t y ear 1—2 yea rs ... .... After 2 yea rs ................ ...... 2.850 2.950 3.150 3.250 40 40 __ ... . . _ . . ....... LANSING, MICH . 2 GRAND RAPIDS, MICH. B uses: 4—1?. months After 1 y ear __ .......... _ _ ................ ... . ... 2.230 2.280 2.330 2.320 2.370 2.420 44 44 44 1.900 1.950 LINCOLN, NEBR .2 B uses: Regin ning_„m _„. F.vperienreH 3 . . . _ .................................. . . . 1.900 _ _ GREENSBORO, N .C . 2 L IT T L E ROCK, ARK. B uses: F v p orion ro ^ 3 . 1.920 _ 2.020 2.000 2.100 _ HAMMOND, IND .2 B uses: Regrinning .............. _ ... . 2.400 2.550 2.570 2.720 40 40 HAM PTON -NEW PORT NEWS, V A .2 B u ses; F ir s t 90 Hays 91 Hay«b-1 y ear ................. . . ....... 1.850 1.900 2.000 4 1.850 4 1.900 4 2.000 B uses: r i r o t A months 7—12 months After 1 y e a r . _ . ... 2.070 ........... . .. 2.220 2.120 2.170 2.270 2.320 _ _ .. ........ 2.840 2.930 2.980 3.070 40 40 2.850 2.950 3.150 3.250 40 40 2.450 2.530 2.580 2.600 2.530 2.610 2.660 2.680 40 40 40 40 2.340 2.390 2.540 2.590 40 40 2.380 2.430 2.580 2.630 40 40 2.460 2.510 2.660 2.710 40 40 2.480 2.530 2.680 2.730 40 40 LONG BEACH, C A L IF .2 B uses: Reginning . F.vpe rienced 3. ._ ... LOS ANGELES, CALIF. _ _ Buses: TTirfit yoar After 1 y ear ..... ......................... . .... HARTFORD, CONN .2 BuseB; F ir s t 6 months LOUISVILLE, KY. .. .. __ 1.750 2.390 4 1.750 4 2.390 42‘/i 42Vz HOUSTON, TEX. B uses: F ir st 3 months, ........... - ........ . 2.460 2.490 2.520 2.550 2.590 2.620 2.650 2.680 42V2 42‘/z 42VZ 42V2 2.580 2.600 2.640 2.660 2.710 40 40 40 INDIANAPOLIS, IND. B uses: Z .b 5 0 JACKSON, MISS. B uses: F irpt y e a r „ r After 1 y ear __ 2.150 _ — S e e fo o t n o t e s at en d o f ta b le . 2.200 2.240 2.290 . B uses: F ir s t .3 months 4—A m o n t h s ......... 7-12 months .. . Aftpr 1 year _ ..... . ____ . ........ ________ _. _ _ .... ___ ...... MADISON, WIS. B uses: F ir s t 4 months: Day ___ . ................. . Night_ _ _ _________ ________ 5—8 m onths: Day . .. .. Night. ___ _ ___ _ 9—12 months: Day __ _ _ _. Night ____ ____ ____ ... A fter 1 year; Dav Night. __ . .. 9 T a b le 9. U n ion S c a le s o f W a g es and H o u rs f o r L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e ra tin g E m p lo y e e s , J u ly 1, 1966, and J u ly 1, 1967— C on tin u ed July 1, 1966 City and cla s sific a tio n Rate per hour July 1, 1966 July 1, 1967 Rate per hour Hours P«* week 1 City and c la s sific a tio n $2. 670 40 B uses— Continued Queens Bus D ivision: F ir s t 6 m onths— _ _ _ 7—12 m on th s. A fter 1 y ear — G reen Lines: F irst A mnntli« 7—12 months — 13—18 months A fter 18 months Jam aica B uses, I n c.: F ir st 6 m onths-----------------------------------------7—12 mnntVis ......... ...... . ............. ...... July 1, Rate per hour 1967 Hours per week1 NEW YORK, N. Y .— Continued MEMPHIS, TENN. Buses Rate per hour $ 2 .590 — MILWAUKEE, WIS. Buses: F ir st year 3.010 3. 050 3. 200 3. 240 40 40 2 .910 2. 940 2 . 980 2 .9 8 0 3. 010 3. 050 40 40 40 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL, MINN. Buses: F ir s t 9 m onths------------------------------------------------- MOBILE, A L A . 2 Buses: A fter 1 y e a r _______________ ______ _____________ 2. 310 2 .360 2. 350 2.4 0 0 _ MONTGOMERY, A L A . 2 B uses: 2 . 200 2. 270 2. 270 2. 340 - NASHVILLE, TENN. 2 Buses: 2 . 290 2. 320 2. 350 2. 380 2. 2. 2. 2. T r i-B o r o C oach C orp. : F ir s t 12 m on th s. 13—18 months ___ After IS mnntVis ... . .. Subway: Conductors: F ir st position: 2. 340 2. 410 2. 840 2. 930 3 .020 3. 110 2. 2. 3. 3. 900 990 080 170 40 40 40 40 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 840 930 020 110 110 2 . 900 990 080 170 170 40 40 40 40 40 2.790 2 . 820 2 . 860 2. 940 2. 970 3. 010 40 40 40 NEWARK, N. J. B uses: mnntVis 9—12 months Subway: M otorm en: F ir s t 4 m onths_____________________________ A fter 1 y e a r _______________________________ T^la tfnrm mAn ..... 2. 3. 3. 3. Schenck T ransport C o . : F ir st 9 months 10—18 months A fter 18 months Steinway T ransit C o r p .: 390 420 450 480 NEW BEDFORD, MASS. 2 Buses: ITYporionroH ^ A fter 18 months Manhattan-Bronx Surface Authority: F ir s t 6 months 7—12 months Aftor 1 y sa r Queens T ransit C o r p .: F ir s t 6 months 7—12 m on th s______—------ ------- . - . -......... 13—18 months 19—24 month” , ________________ ____ _ ___ .................. ....... After 1 y « r ..................... Sprnnrf position .. ......... . M otorm en: Road: F ir s t year A fter 1 year Yard: Fi rst yea r ... .. After 1 ypar _ . . P la tform men: TTir«t year . _ A fter 1 year .. ..... . ... $3,025 3. 180 3.350 3. 3. 3. 3. 070 120 190 350 $3,365 3. 540 3 .730 520 570 640 800 40 40 40 40 2 .8 9 5 2. 975 3. 045 3. 180 3 .275 3. 355 3. 425 3. 560 40 40 40 40 3.0 2 5 3. 180 3. 350 3. 365 3.540 3. 730 40 40 40 2.8 9 5 2.9 7 5 3.0 4 5 3. 115 3. 180 3 .275 3 .355 3 .425 3 .495 3. 560 40 40 40 40 40 2 .730 2 .790 3. 000 2 .830 2 . 890 3. 100 40 40 40 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 275 355 425 495 560 40 40 40 40 40 2 . 880 3. 070 3. 180 3. 260 3 .450 3. 560 40 40 40 2.9 9 5 3. 072 2 .940 3. 333 3 .418 3. 273 40 40 40 3. 520 3 .600 3. 915 4 .0 0 8 40 40 3. 360 3. 437 3. 740 3. 825 40 40 2. 825 2.872 3. 143 3. 198 40 40 2. 300 2. 350 2. 380 2 .430 2. 300 2. 350 2. 400 2 .400 2 .450 2. 500 - 2 . 020 2.0 7 0 2. 150 2.0 7 0 2 . 120 2 . 200 43 43 43 2. 440 2. 470 2. 510 2 . 690 2. 720 2.7 6 0 45 45 45 895 975 045 115 180 3. 3. 3. 3. 40 40 40 NEW HAVEN, CONN. NIAGARA F AL LS, N. Y. 2 B uses: F ir s t 3 m onths------------------------------------------------4—1? 1-pApt^fl . Af t a y 1 yAar . .. Buses: Beginning ... F.vperienrerf 3 ....... .. .... ...... ........ ............... NORFOLK. VA. NEW ORLEANS, LA. 1 -m an ca rs and buses: F ir s t 6 m r'r><~^ic ........... - _____ __ — .. A fter 1 y e a r ----------------------------------------------------- 2 -m an ca rs : F ir st 6 m onths------------------------------------------------7—12 months A fter 1 y e a r ___________ ___ — --------------- ----- - 2.775 2. 805 2 .835 2. 895 2. 925 2. 955 . 2.7 0 5 2 .735 2 .765 2. 825 2. 855 2. 885 - Buses: F ir s t 3 months 4—12 months After 1 y ear ................................ . y«-l ? mAntKe S e e fo o t n o t e s a t en d o f t a b le . .. . OAKLAND, CALIF. (Scales listed under San F ra n cisco—Oakland, C a lif.) OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLA. NEW YORK, N. Y. Buses: Avenue B and East Broadway T ransit C o . : ]Tir«t A mnntl’ie 7—12 m on th s-----------------------------------------------13—24 m onths---------------------------------------------A fter 2 y ears — — ——— —— — — — — ---- ----B rooklyn Bus D ivision; B rooklyn D ivision No. 2; Manhattan Bus D ivision: .. . 1 -m an c a rs and buses: F ir st 6 months 2. 830 2 .910 2 .980 3. 115 3. 3. 3. 3. 210 290 360 495 40 40 40 40 7—12 months _ After 1 yea r . ........ ......... OMAHA, NEBR. Buses: 3. 025 3. 180 3. 350 3. 365 3. 540 3. 730 40 40 40 After 1 yea r _. 10 T a b le 9. U n ion S c a le s o f W a g es and H o u rs f o r L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e ra tin g E m p lo y e e s , J u ly 1, July 1, 1966 City and cla s sific a tio n Rate per hour 1967— C on tin u ed July 1, 1966 July 1, 1967 Rate per hour City and cla s sific a tio n Hours P<* week1 July 1, 1967 Rate Rate per hour per hour $ 2 . 710 2 . 810 2 . 920 $ 2 . 860 2 . 960 3. 070 40 40 40 2. 750 2.900 3. 000 2. 840 2.990 3. 090 40 40 40 2. 230 2. 310 2. 310 2. 370 - 2 . 090 2. 170 2. 230 2. 310 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.780 2. 830 2.880 2. 940 2.990 3.040 40 40 40 3. 350 3.730 40 3. 260 3. 310 3. 460 3. 510 40 40 2.710 2 . 800 2.790 2.880 - 2. 850 2. 950 3. 150 3.250 40 40 1.790 1. 890 1. 850 1.950 2 . 000 2 . 100 40 3. 135 3. 200 3. 235 3. 300 - 2 . 180 2. 230 2. 290 2. 240 2 . 290 2. 350 2.410 2.435 2.460 2.410 2 .435 2.460 Hours per week 1 SACRAMENTO, C ALIF. PASADENA, C A L IF . 2 Buses: Beginning___ ___________________ E x p erien ced 3.................................... 1966, and J u ly 1, $ 2 ,7 5 0 2.850 $ 2 . 850 2. 950 - 2 .8 4 0 2.930 3.020 3. 110 2 . 900 40 40 40 40 Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths______________________________ 7—12 m on th s________________________________ A fter 1 y e a r _________ ___________ ___________ PATERSON, N. J. 2 ST. PAUL, MINN. Buses: F ir st 4 months. 5—8 m onths____ 9—12 m on th s__ A fter 1 y e a r __ 2. 990 3.080 3. 170 2.430 2.450 2.470 2. 530 2. 550 2. 570 40 40 40 7—12 m on th s-------- -----------*____________ 13—18 m onths.............................................. A fter 18 m onths_______________ ______ Elevated, high speed and subway lines: Conductors: F ir st 6 m onths______ ____ ________ 7—12 m on th s._____ ________________ 13—18 m onths........................................ A fter 18 m on th s__________________ O perators: F irst 6 m onths____________ _______ 7—12 m on th s______________________ 13—18 m onths_____________________ A fter 18 m on th s__________________ SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH A ft e r 2 . 810 2 . 860 2 . 960 2.910 2.960 3. 010 3. 060 3. 1L0 40 40 40 40 2.710 2. 760 2 . 810 2.860 2 .910 2 . 960 3. 010 3. 060 40 40 40 40 2.810 2 . 860 2. 910 2.960 2. 3. 3. 3. 40 40 40 40 960 010 060 110 PHOENIX, ARIZ. Buses: F ir st y ea r-----------------------------------A fter 1 y e a r ........................................ 7—12 m on th s_________ ______ ________________ A fter 1 y e a r .............. ......................... ................... Buses: F ir st 6 m onths______________________________ PHILADELPHIA, PA. 1 -m an ca rs and buses: F ir st 6 m onths___________________ ____ ST. LOUIS, MO. 1 -m an c a rs and buses: F ir s t 6 m onths______________________________ PEORIA, ILL. B uses: F ir st 9 m onths_______________________ 10-18 m onths.............................................. A fter 18 m on th s___ _________________ (S cales listed under1 M inneapolis—St. Paul, M inn.) SAN ANTONIO, TEX. Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths......................... ............................ 7—12 m on th s___ ____________________ ________ 13—18 m onths.............. ............................ ............... A f t e r 18 m o n t h s 2. 150 2. 250 2. 270 2. 370 - 3. 195 3. 285 3. 340 3. 325 3 .425 3. 470 40 40 40 4— 12 m o n t h s A fter 1 y e a r ____ _____ ____________ _______ __ San F ra n cisco: B uses and tra ck less tro lle y s, and cable gripm en and con d u ctors........... .......... Oakland: Buses: F irst 6 m o n t h s ____ A f t e r 6 m o n t h s .. .................... SAN JOSE, CALIF. 2 Buses: Beginning___ ____________ __________________ E x p e r ie n c e d 3..... .......... — ..................................... PORTLAND, OREG. 2.600 2. 650 2.700 2. 750 2 . 800 2. 850 2.890 2. 700 2. 750 2 . 800 2. 850 2 . 900 2. 950 3. 000 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 - SANTA ANA, CALIF. 2 Buses: F irs t yea r A fter 1 y e a r -------------------------- --------- -----------SAVANNAH, GA. 2 Buses: PROVIDENCE, R .I. Buses: F ir st 3 months. 4—12 m on th s__ A fter 1 y e a r __ 140 220 280 360 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. Buses: F ir s t 3 m onths______________________________ 1 -m an ca r s and buses: Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths__________________ 7—12 m on th s._____ ______________ 13—18 m onths..................................... 19—24 m onths____________________ 25—30 m onths____________________ 31—36 m onths____________________ A fter 3 y e a r s__________ _____ ____ m o n t h s . ... _....................... SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND, CALIF. PITTSBURGH, PA. F ir st 3 m onths................................... 4—12 m on th s________ ____ ____ __ A fter 1 y e a r _____________________ 6 B e g in n in g . E x p ^ r i e n r e H V. 2. 550 2. 580 2 . 600 2 .650 2 .680 2. 700 40 40 40 __ _ SCRANTON, PA. .. ......... RICHMOND, VA. SEATTLE, WASH. Buses: F ir st 3 m onths..... ............................ 4 -1 2 m on th s_____ ______ ________ A fter 1 y e a r ..... ................................ 2. 300 2. 350 2.400 2.400 2 .450 2. 500 . ROCHESTER, N. Y. Buses: F ir s t 3 m onths__________________ 4—12 m on th s____________________ A fter 1 y e a r ____________________ S ee fo o t n o t e s at end at ta b le . A fter 6 m onths_________ ____ __ _____ _______ SHREVEPORT, LA. 2. 535 2. 595 2 .695 2 . 620 2 . 680 2. 780 40 40 40 ROCKFORD, IL L . 2 Buses: F ir st 6 m onths__ 7—12 m on th s......... 13—18 m onths____ A fter 18 m onths.. Buses: F ir s t 6 m o n th s - Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths..___ _____ ____ ______________ 7—12 m on th s........................................................... A fter 1 y e a r ............................................. ............. " SOUTH BEND, END. (7) (! ) (! ) (7 ) 2.610 2. 630 2 .650 2 .670 44 44 44 44 Buses: F ir s t 6 m onths______________________________ 7—12 m o n th s............................................. ............ A fter 1 y e a r ................. ........... ............................. 40 40 40 11 T a b le 9 . U n ion S c a le s o f W a g es and H o u rs f o r L o c a l - T r a n s i t O p e ra tin g E m p lo y e e s , J u ly 1, 1966, and J u ly 1, 1967— C on tin u ed July 1, 1966 City and cla s sific a tio n July 1, 1966 Rate per hour July 1, 1967 Rate per hour Rate per hour $ 2. 330 2. 380 2. 430 $ 2. 380 2. 430 2. 480 City and cla s sific a tio n Hours P** week July! 1,1967 Rate per hour Hours per week1 TUCSON, A R IZ . 2 SPOKANE, WASH. Buses: Buses: F irst ^ m onths.... 4—Q months ... $ 1.940 ........ A fter 15 months $ 2. 140 4 1. 940 4 2 .0 10 42.090 4 2.140 2. 390 2. 480 2. 490 2. 580 2. 460 2. 490 2. 530 2. 530 2. 560 2 . 600 40 40 40 3. 165 3. 205 3. 245 3. 285 3. 325 3. 365 40 40 40 (7) M (! ) (7) 1 . 820 1.920 2 . 020 2 . 120 55 55 55 55 1. 525 1.650 - 1.740 1. 840 1 . 820 1.920 - 2. 470 2. 570 2. 530 2. 630 - 2 . 660 2. 760 2. 935 3. 035 3.211 40 40 40 40 2 . 680 40 40 2 . 010 2 . 090 48 48 48 48 SPRINGFIELD, MASS. UTICA, N. Y . 2 Buses: F ir st 3 months 2.4 0 0 2 .455 2. 500 2 .450 2. 505 2. 550 40 40 40 Buses: Reginning .... .. ..... F.vperienreH 3 ...... .. .. _ ...... ........ w aterbu ry, conn. SYRACUSE, N. Y. Buses: 2. 440 2. 480 2. 700 2. 540 2. 580 2 . 800 40 40 40 Buses: Tirst. 3 months TACOMA. WASH. 2 .. . 2 ..... . . . ------ _ WASHINGTON, D. C. B uses: Buses: 2 . 810 2.950 2. 990 3. 130 2.3 0 0 2. 380 2 .380 2. 460 4~1 ?. m o n th s ---A fter 1 y e a r . _ TAM PA, F L A . WICHITA, KANS . 2 Buses: F ir st 6 months A ft e r f\ m o n th s — — ______ ........................................ ........... - Buses: F i r s t h m o n th s B uses: F irst 6 m onths. ------------- --------- . 7—12 m on th s-------------------- --- -----------------,--------A fter 1 year -----_ ---- - — 2 .650 2.6 7 0 2 .700 2 .780 2.8 1 0 2.830 40 40 40 TOPEKA, KANS. Buses: F irst 6 m onths-----------------------------------------------A fter 6 m onths------------------------------------------------ .. 1.475 1.600 WINSTON-SALEM, N .C . 2 1. 813 1.890 1.853 1. 930 48 48 . ... . 2 .850 2.9 5 0 3. 150 3. 250 40 40 Buses: Beginning E x p e r ie n c e d 3 — _____________ ______________ B uses: Beginning E x p erien ced 3 . . YONKERS, N. Y. 2 B uses: Buses: mnntVte 1 y «ar 2. 720 2. 760 2 . 800 .. , 2. 830 2. 870 2.910 40 40 40 ft rnnnthc A rnrmtKa 2. 835 2. 935 3. I l l YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO 2 TULSA, OKLA. Buses: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . WICHITA F A L LS, T E X . 2 TRENTON, N. J. 17. . WORCESTER, MASS. 2 Buses: F irst y ea r------------------------------------------------------- iii . B uses: Beginning — E x p erien ced 3 ___ ____ ___ __-_______ _________ TORRANCE, C A L IF . 2 A f t e r 1 yea r ............ 7—12 m on th s13—18 m onths________________________________ A fter 18 m on th s-------------------------------------------- TOLEDO, OHIO ... .......... .... 2 . 100 2 . 200 2 . 150 2. 250 43V3 43 */3 B uses: F ir st year 2. 580 2. 630 2. 730 Hours per w eek a re shown only fo r those citie s that reported a regular w orkw eek after which prem ium ov ertim e was paid. This city is not co v e re d in the B ureau's survey. Data w ere obtained fr o m sou rces other than lo c a l union o ffic ia ls . Inform ation on in crem ents in sca le, if any, between beginning and experienced rates was not available. This rate in effect p r io r to July 1, 1967; new sca le in negotiation at tim e o f survey. 48-hour w orkw eek on July 1, 1966. 51-hour w orkw eek on July 1, 1966. Inform ation not available fo r rate and hours on July 1, 1966. ☆ U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING O FF IC E : 1968 O - 295-529 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS REGIONAL OFFICES New England John F . K en n edy F e d e r a l B u ild in g G o v e r n m e n t C e n t e r , R o o m 1 6 0 3 -B B o s to n , M a s s . 0 2203 T e l . : 2 2 3 -6 7 6 2 Mid-Atlantic 341 N inth A v en u e N ew Y o r k , N . Y . 10001 T e l . : 9 7 1 -5 4 0 5 Southern 1371 P e a c h t r e e S t r e e t , N E . A tla n ta , G a . 30309 T e l . : 5 2 6 -5 4 1 8 North Central 219 South D e a r b o r n S tre e t C h ic a g o , 111. 60604 T e l . : 3 5 3 -7 2 3 0 Pacific 450 G o ld e n G ate A v en u e B o x 36017 San F r a n c i s c o , C a lif. 9 41 02 T e l . : 5 5 6 -4 6 7 8 Mountain- Plai ns F e d e r a l O ffic e B u ild in g , T h ir d F io o r 911 W alnut S tre e t K a n s a s C it y , M o . 64106 T e l . : 3 7 4 -2 4 8 1
@FedFRASER