View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
JAMES J. DAVIS. Secretary

CHILDREN’S BUREAU
GRACE ABBOTT. Chief

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE
A STUDY MADE IN A MIDDLE-WESTERN AND AN
EASTERN CITY DURING THE INDUSTRIAL
DEPRESSION OF 1921 AND 1922

By
EMMA OCTAVIA LUNDBERG

Bureau Publication No. 125

WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

1923


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

OWING TO LIMITED APPROPRIATIONS FOR PRINTING, IT IS
NOT POSSIBLE TO DISTRIBUTE THIS BULLETIN JN LARGE
QUANTITIES. ADDITIONAL COPIES M AY BE PROCURED
FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D . C.
AT

20 CEN TS P E R C O P Y


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

5 (s i. 7
U .5 S C
% i > b"

C O N TEN TS.

Letter of transmittal........................................................................ ..........................................

Page.
ix

1

W hat the father’s unem ploym ent means to the children..................................... ..
T h e field of the stu d y......................... . .................................. ....................................................

5 *-ll

Purpose..................................................................... ....................................... : . ......................
Cities included.................................................

5
6 -1 0

Reasons for selection.....................................................................................................

6

E xten t of u nem ploym ent..................................................................................: . . .

7

Measures taken to provide em ploym ent..............................................................

9

Sources of information..................................................................................................... ; .

10

T he families of the u nem ployed...............................................................................................13-96
Racine, W is —

....................................................... ................... .............. L. . . . . . . 1____ 1 5-21

Duration of u nem ploym ent......... ....................................................................... f f ;

15

N um ber of children affected......................... .......................................

15

General facts concerning the fath ers................................................; .................

16

Previous work status of fathers............................................................ ....................

17

Ownership of hom e........................................................................................................

18

Housing conditions....................... ................................................ ..............................

19

R ents p aid ........................................................

20

Springfield, Mass...............................................................

2 2-27

Duration of unem ploym ent...............................

22

N u m ber of children affected.................................... ................................................

22

General facts concerning the fathers.....................................................................

23

Previous work status of fathers.................. .............................................................

24

Ownership of hom e.............................................

26

Housing conditions........................................................................................................

26

R ents p a i d . . . . ..............................

27

Resources during u n em p lo ym en t..............................................................................

2 7-35

Sources of livelihood..........................................

27

Proportions of total maintenance derived from the various sources........

30

W ee k ly resources at the tim e of in qu iry.............................................................

31

Average m onthly resources during unem ploym ent........................................

32

Incom e during year preceding u n em p lo ym en t...............................................

32

Lowered standards of livin g......................................................... - ............... ............... .... 3 6-45
M onthly resources before and during unem ploym ent........................ ...........

36

Comparison of resources during unem ploym ent w ith estimated fam ily
budgets.......................................................
Illustrations of the effect of unem ploym ent on standards of liv in g -----E m ploym ent of the mother.....................................

36
39
4 5-56

Relation to unem ploym ent of father........... .........................................................

45

W ork at home and away from hom e............................................................. ..

46

Hours em ployed per w eek ....... ........................................

46

T h e children of working m others...........................................................................

47

Care of the children during the mother’s a b sen ce....................................

48

T h e mother’s earnings..................................................................................................

49

T yp ical instances..........................................................................................- . .............

49

m

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

IV

CONTENTS.

T he families of the unem ployed— Continued.

Page.

Em ploym ent of the children............................. ................................................................ 5 7-60
Fam ily income from children’s earnings.............................................................

57

Num ber of children em ployed.................................................................................

57

Ages of working children............................. .............................................................

57

Grades completed b y children who w ent to work..........................................

58

Occupations..............................................

59

W ages...................................................................................................................................

59

Savings exhausted..................................................................................................................... 60-65
A m ount of savings......................................................................................... ........ : . .

60

Charitable aid in relation to savings......................................................................

61

Loss of homes......................................................

61

Families who had used u p their savings.............................................................

61

T h e burden of d eb t...........................................................................................

65-79

E xten t and forms of indebtedness.....................................

65

Proportion of maintenance secured through credit or loans.......................

66

T h e cost of cash loans...................................................................................................

67

Families who had mortgaged the future........................ .......... .........................

68

Credit for food supplies......... ..........................................................

76

Charitable aid b y public or private agencies............................................................. 79-84
Assistance given the families....................................................

79

Interval betw een loss of work and application for a id ..................................

80

Duration of aid .............................

80

A id to families of skilled and unskilled workers.................................. - - - - -

81

Relation of aid received to total resources..................................................... ....

82

T h e coincidence of illness and unem ploym ent......................................................... 8 5-90
E xte n t of illness............................................. ..................................... ¡¿*.t.....................

85

Debts for medical care.....................................................* ..........................................
U nem ploym ent among families given nursing service.................................

86
86

Fam ilies handicapped b y illness...................................

92

Unem ploym ent and the relief problem in R acine.......................................................... 97-108
The city commissary.............................................................................................................

97

R elief work and loans b y factories..................................................................................

99

The city poor office................................................................................................................

100

T h e private relief agen cy............................................................................................... 100-102
R elief to families of unem ployed m e n .................................................................
101
Increase in the relief p ro blem ............... ..................................................................

102

Families given aid because of unem ploym en t...................................................... 103-105
Duration of unem ploym ent before applying for a id ......................................

103

N a tiv ity and residence of fathers................................................. ..........................

103

Children in families given a id .............................................................................

104

E m ploym ent of children............................................................................................

104

Illness in the fam ilies...................................................................................................

104

Free m ilk to school children.............................................................................................

105

Children brought to the day nursery.............................................................................
Mothers’ pensions and unem ploym ent......................

106
107

Families of m en given emergency em ploym ent in Springfield.............................. 109-114
T h e father’s previous em p lo y m e n t...............................................................

109-111

Interval betw een loss of em ploym ent and application for city w o r k .. .

109

W ee k ly wages................................................................................. ............... .......... . . .
Occupations.................. ................................................................... ..........................

110

Social data..........................................

110
111-114

Ages of fathers.............................................................................

I ll

N a tiv ity and length of residence in c it y ................................ ............................

I ll


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

CONTENTS.

V

Fam ilies of m en given emergency em ploym ent in Springfield— Continued.
Social data— Continued.

Page.

N um ber and ages of children....................................................................................

I ll

D ebts..........................

112

Assistance b y public and private agen cies.. .....................................................

113

Child labor in an u nem ploym ent period..........................................................................

115-132

Children eligible for w ork.................................................

115

E ffect on child labor in R acine...................................- .............................................. 115-120
Children enrolled in continuation school......... . .......................... ...........- ........
116
Tim e elapsed since leaving regular school............................... — ..................

117

Decline in child labor..................................................................................................

.117

Jobs secured b y children during unem ploym ent period..............................

119

E ffect on child labor in Springfield........................................................................... 120-132
E m ploym ent certificates......................................................... .......................... - —
Child labor before and during the unem ploym ent period...........................

120
121

Children attending continuation school...............................................................

123

Children securing work during the unem ploym ent period.........................
W h y the children left school to go to w ork........................................................

123
126

U nem ploym ent of children..........................................

126

Summaries of conditions b y districts......................................................................................

133

Appendixes—
A ppendix A .
A ppen dix B .

T ables.................................................................- ........................................
Forms used in the s tu d y .............................. ........................................

146
169

TABLES.
Text—
Table I .— Sources of fam ily maintenance during father’s unem ploym ent;
based on reports of 136 fam ilies..............................................................

31

I I .— Comparison of average m onthly resources and estimated budget
requirement; families for whom average m onthly resources
were reported........................................................................................ - - - 38
Detailed—
34
Table A .— Sources of maintenance during father’s unem ploym ent................
B.
— Mothers working away from home during father’s unem ploy­
m e n t.................................... ......................................................... - .................
54
C.— Debts incurred or unpaid because of unem ploym ent......................
74
D.
— Families receiving charitable aid during unem ploym ent of
E.

father......................................................................................................................
— Families reporting illness during the period of the father’s un­

F.

em ploym ent........................................................... - .....................................
— Springfield: Children 14 and 15 years of age to whom em ploy­

83

88

m ent certificates had been issued since M ay 1, 1921, who
were unem ployed February 1 , 1 9 2 2 ......................................................
G.

128

— Springfield: Children 14 and 15 years of age to whom em ploy­
m ent certificates had been issued prior to M ay 1 ,1 9 2 1 , who

were unem ployed February 1, 1922.........................................
A pp en dix—
Table 1.— Racine: Duration of unem ploym ent of father and last regular

2.

occupation.........................................................................................
— Springfield: Duration of unem ploym ent of father and last regu­

3.

lar occupation..................................................................................................
— Racine: Country of birth of unem ployed fathers, b y length of

4.

— Springfield: Country of birth of unem ployed fathers, b y length

residence in U nited States and work status...................................
of residence in U nited States and work status.................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

129

143
143
144
145

VI

CONTENTS.

A ppen dix— Continued.
T able

Pago.

5.— Racine: Literacy and nativity of father, b y duration of unem ­
ploym ent of father.....................................................................................

146

6.

— Springfield: Literacy and nativity of father, b y duration of
unem ploym ent of father..........................................................................

146

7.

Racine: Citizenship of foreign-born unemployed fathers, b y
length of residence in the U nited States.........................................

146

8.

—-Springfield: Citizenship of foreign-born unem ployed fathers,
b y length of residence in the U nited States..................................
147

9-

R acin e: Tenure of homes occupied b y families of unemployed
m en , b y duration of occupancy..........................................................

147

10-

Springfield: Tenure of homes occupied b y families of un­
em ployed m en, b y duration of occupancy............................. ........

147

11-

R acine: M onthly rental of families occupying rented houses
during father’s unem ploym ent, b y number of rooms in house.
Springfield : M onthly rental of families occupying rented houses

148

12.

during father’s unem ploym ent, b y number of rooms in house.
R acin e: Num ber of persons in households of unem ployed men,
b y number of rooms in house.................................................................

148
148

14.

— Springfield: N um ber of persons in households of unemployed
m en , b y number of rooms in house....................................................

149

15.

— R acin e: M onthly rental at tim e of study of families of un­

13.

em ployed m en , b y m onthly rental previous to unem ploym ent

149

Springfield: M onthly rental at tim e of stud y of familiés of
unem ployed m en, b y m onthly rental previous to unem ploy47.

m en t ..................................................- .............................................................
R acine: Total resources of fam ily during father’s unem ploy­
m en t, b y duration of unem ploym ent and ownership of h om e. .
Springfield: Total resources of fam ily during father’s unemploy­

150
151

19.

m ent, b y duration of unem ploym ent and ownership of hom e. .
152
— Sources of incom e during unem ploym ent in families of unem­
152
ployed m en, b y c ity .................... ..................... .......................................

20.

Racine and Springfield: Average m onthly resources of families
of unem ployed m en , prior to unem ploym ent and during
u n em p lo ym en t........................................................................ . .................

453

21-— R acine: Duration of father’s unem ploym ent, b y father’s total
earnings from temporary work during unem ploym ent..............

153

22.

Springfield: Duration of father’s unem ploym ent, b y father’s

23.

total earnings from temporary work during u n e m p lo ym e n t..
154
— R acin e: Num ber of persons in families of unem ployed m en, b y
w eekly incom e at tim e of stu d y ..........................................................
154

24.

Springfield: Num ber of persons in families of unem ployed m en,
b y w eekly income at tim e of stu d y ....... ................. ..........................

155

25• Racine and Springfield: Num ber of children in families in
which the average m onthly resources during father’s un­
em ploym ent were specified percentages of receipts prior to
unem ploym ent, b y age of ch ild ................................................... ..

455

2 6 — Racine : Average m onthly resources during unem ploym ent and
estimated budget requirements for families of unemployed
27.

m e u - - ...................................................... - ...................... ..........................
Springfield: Average m onthly resources during unem ploym ent

156

and estimated budget requirements for families of unemployed
m e n ...................................................................................................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

156

CONTENTS.

vn

Appendix-r-Continued.
Page.
T able 28.— R acine: Interval elapsing betw een beginning of unem ploym ent
and receiving charitable aid, b y previous work status of
29.

unem ployed m e n .............................................. - .......................................
156
— Springfield: Interval elapsing betw een beginning of unem ploy­
m ent and receiving charitable aid, b y previous work status of

30.

unem ployed m e n .......................... - ...........................................................
157
— R acin e: A m ou n t and duration of charitable aid received b y

31.

157
families of unem ployed m e n .................................................................
— Springfield: A m ou n t and duration of charitable aid received b y

32.

— Racine : Average num ber of working hours per week for mothers

families of unem ployed

m e n ................................................................

158

who worked during father’s unem ploym ent, b y type of work
and place of em ploym en t............ ................. : ........................................

158

33.

— Springfield: Average number of working hours per week for
mothers who worked during father’s unem ploym ent, b y type

34.

— Racine and Springfield: E m ploym ent of mothers during unem ­

35.

— R acin e: School grade of children of unem ployed m en, b y age
and se x .............................................................................................................
— Springfield : School grade of children of unem ployed m en, b y

1®®

36.

age and se x ....................................................................................................
— Racine and Springfield: A m ou n t of w eekly earnings of working

1®1

37.

children of unem ployed m en, b y age and s e x ...............................

162

38.

— R acin e: Occupation of working children during father’s unem ­

39.

— Springfield: Occupation of working children during father’s

40.

— R acine and Springfield: T im e of beginning work and grade in

41.

s e x ...................................................................................................... ...............
1®4
— Racine and Springfield: Length of tim e since leaving school of

42.

— Springfield: E m p loym en t status February 1, 1922, of children

of work and place of em ploym ent......................................................
ploym en t period of fathers, b y place of em ploym ent................

159
159

ploym ent, and tim e of beginning work, b y age and s e x ..........
unem ploym ent, and tim e of beginning work, b y age and s e x ..

162
163

school of working children of unem ployed m en, b y age and

working children of unem ployed m en, b y age and se x .............

165

whose first em ploym ent certificates were issued subsequent

43.

to M ay 1 ,1 9 2 1 , b y age and s e x .................. .........................................
165
— Springfield: Length of tim e since original em ploym ent certifi­
cate was issued to children who received certificates subse­
quent to M ay 1 ,1 9 2 1 , b u t who were not at work February 1,

44.

1922; b y am ount of tim e worked........................................................
165
— Springfield: N um ber of jobs held and total am ount of tim e
child had worked prior to February 1, 1922; children with
em ploym ent certificates, unem ployed February 1 ,1 9 2 2 ..........

45.

166

— Springfield: Grade completed b y children betw een 14 and 16
years of age to whom em ploym ent certificates had been issued
b u t who were not at work February 1 ,1 9 2 2 , b y age and se x .

46.

14 and 16 years of age to whom em ploym ent certificates had
been issued b u t who were not at work February 1 ,1 9 2 2 , b y
am ount of tim e worked in all positions........ 1..................................
47.
48.

166

— Springfield: Length of em ploym ent history of children between

167

— Springfield: Period of residence in thp city, of unem ployed m en
who were given city work, b y country of b irth .............. .............
167
— Springfield: Previous w eekly wages of unem ployed m en, b y
length of unem ploym ent before application for city work—
168


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

vin

CON TENTS.

CH ARTS.
Chart I .— Ages of children in families of unem ployed m e n ........................................

Page.
14

I I .— Duration of u nem ploym ent...................................................................................

21

III.

— Percentages of families reporting various sources of maintenance

IV .

— Average m onthly resources during the unem ploym ent period com­

during the fathers’ unem ploym ent............... ................................................

28

pared with incomes in the preceding year.................................................

33

V .— E m ploym en t of mothers before and during unem ploym ent of fathers.

47

V I .— Interval between loss of work and application for a id ..............................

81

V I I .— Racine, W is.— E m p loym en t of children...................... ...................................

118

V I I I .— Springfield, Mass.— E m ploym ent of children............ ...................................

122

I X . — Springfield, Mass.— E m ploym ent of children................................................

125


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M

LETTER OF T R A N SM IT TA L.

U . S. D epartm ent

of

L abor,

C h il d r e n ’s B u r e a u ,

Washington, February 28, 1923.
: There is transmitted herewith a report on Unemployment and
Child Welfare which is based on a study made in two cities.
Emma O. Lundberg, director of the social service division, was in
charge of the investigation and has also written the report. Assist­
ance in conducting the field study and preparing the material for
publication was given by Mary E. Milburn and Ruth Bloodgood, both
of the staff of the social service division of the Children’s Bureau.
The findings of this report make it clear that large groups of children
suffer not temporary but permanent losses as a result of a period of
industrial depression. Those who are interested in raising the
standard of our citizenship through better care of the children of the
country can not regard as outside the field of their concern, proposals
for preventing unemployment and, failing in a program of prevention,
measures which are necessary for safeguarding the children during a
period of unemployment.
Respectfully submitted.
Sir

G race

A bbott,

Chief.
Hon.

Ja m e s

J. D a v is ,

Secretary o f Labor.
IX


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

*


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD
WELFARE.
W HAT

THE

FATH ER ’ S

UN EM PLOYM ENT

M EANS

TO

TH E

CH ILD R EN .

During the industrial depression of 1921 and 1922, the Children’s
Bureau undertook a careful study of the effect of unemployment
upon local problems of child welfare. For this inquiry two cities
were selected in which there was successful coordination of the
public and private resources and generous expenditure for the
mitigation of the hardships incident to that period. They were cities
in which the industries required a large percentage of skilled workers
and paid wages that permitted a higher standard of living than the
workers - in many industrial communities enjoy; both had been
unusually prosperous during the period immediately preceding the
industrial depression.
The families for whom schedules were taken were selected from the
lists of the men who were registered in the local employment offices
and represented, as nearly as possible, a cross section of families of
unemployed men in which there were two or more children under 18
years of age. The evidence shows that their earnings prior to the
period of depression had permitted the families of many of these
workingmen to begin payments on homes, lay aside money for the
education of their children, for possible emergencies and for old age,
and that they were at the same time living comfortably. It is prob­
ably safe to say that the families of these two cities had resources
both in actual savings and in credit which the workers in many com­
munities did not have.
But a long period of unemployment—more than two-thirds of the
fathers included in the study had been out of work for more than
a year—had gradually exhausted the resources of the families, and
recourse to public and private relief as well as great changes in the
family life had become necessary.
A large proportion of the men being skilled workers, the incomes
in the families had, in normal times, ranged from $75 to more than
$200 per month. More than nine-tenths of the men for whom com­
plete information as to income was secured had been earning between
$100 and $175 per month. During the period of unemployment,
the complete family resources in four-fifths of the families of these
1

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

same men amounted to between $25 and $100 a month— this, too,
when the earnings of the father in such temporary work as could be
secured, the wages of the mother and the children, the savings that
were taken from the bank, and the loans that were made, the food
and other necessaries purchased on credit, and aid from relatives
and public and private relief agencies were all included. Half of
the families for which there was complete information averaged for
their maintenance during unemployment one-half as much as while
the father was working.
It is inevitable that there should be a lowering of thè standards of
family life when the regular income is interrupted. Frugality in
food, even to the point of actual privation, a dangerous saving of fuel,
economy in clothing and household supplies, reduction of the housing
cost through seeking cheaper quarters or crowding the family to
secure an income from lodgers, always follow the breadwinner’s loss
of work, even though the family does not actually have to seek out­
side sources of aid. When the father loses his job the mother must
secure work if it is possible for her to do so. Approximately onethird of the children included in the study were in families in which
the mother did undertake and was engaged in gainful employment
either within or outside her home. The evidence indicates that in
some of these families the money for the family’s food was secured
at the cost of permanent injury to the health of the mother and neglect
of the children.
The investigation made by the bureau shows that unemployment
not only carries with it immediate deprivation and hardship but
leaves a burden of debt and discouragement for the years to come.
More than two-fifths of the families included in the study had been
able to maintain themselves in part during the unemployment period
on their savings. In many cases these savings represented years of
economizing and of planning for the future. Homes that had been
purchased in whole or in part had to be sacrificed b y many families.
Over four-fifths of the families were in debt for food, rent, fuel,
medical attendance, and other necessities. When the father even­
tually secures work, those families which lived on credit at the stores,
or on borrowed money, will have a burden of debt to meet.
It has been pointed out that the families included in this inquiry
represented as nearly as possible a cross section of families of unem­
ployed men in two cities in which wages had been high. It is there­
fore especially significant to find that over half of them had received
charitable aid from public or private agencies during the father’s
unemployment. In almost three-fourths of the families receivin
such aid, the men had been skilled workers, and 42 per cent of the
families that had had savings when the father was thrown out of


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

TH E FATH ER S U N EM PLOYM EN T AND THE

C H IL D R E N .

3

work had been compelled to seek aid from public or private relief
agencies after their savings were exhausted.
In addition to the other hardships, almost two-thirds of the fam­
ilies reported the illness or disability of one or more members during
the time the father was out of work. Of especial interest in connec­
tion with child welfare are the families— almost a fourth of the whole
number— in which the mother was pregnant or had been confined
during the father’s unemployment.
One of the outstanding conditions incident to the industrial de­
pression, and one that on its face would appear to be entirely bene­
ficial, was the shortage of work for children. Many children who
had been employed were forced to go back to school, and others who
would have tried to eke out the family income while the father was
unemployed remained in school because work could not be secured.
But this gave no guaranty of permanent educational gains. Savings
that would have assured many of the children real educational op­
portunities had been spent. Many of the children in the families
whose future had been burdened by debts would undoubtedly be
sent to work just as soon as they could find any kind of a job. Some
children during all the time when men and women were so desperately
in need of employment left school and secured work.
Thus, the hardships that must be endured by a family when the
father is out of work do not end when conditions improve and he
again has a steady job. The savings of years have been used up in
order to provide maintenance during months of enforced idleness,
perhaps the home whose purchase represented the fulfillment of the
family’s ambitions has been sacrificed. For many months after the
father secures work his wages will have to be divided between the
purchase of the necessaries of life and the payment of the heavy
burden of debt. Many of the fathers interviewed had little hope of
successfully taking up again the task of providing a home and com­
forts for those dependent on them.
Besides the deprivation of material needs, there is the suffering
that perhaps can be understood only by those who have themselves
been the victims of the dread uncertainty and fear that besets a
workingman’s family when the father is “ laid off.” The most im­
portant feature of unemployment is its effect on the family morale—
the father idle about the house, unsettled, disheartened; the mother
going out to work if she can secure it, and using up every bit of her
strength in the double task of providing for the family’s maintenance
and caring for the household and the children; the children suffering
from the depression and uncertainty of what the future may mean,
which is even more to be dreaded than the discomforts of the im­
mediate present.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

4

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Unemployment, then, because it means lowered family standards
anxiety and dread, the loss of savings, and the mortgaging of the
future, has a direct and disastrous effect upon the welfare of children.
While communities are usually able to organize their resources so
that children are not removed from their own homes because of
poverty caused by an industrial crisis, these resources have not been
sufficient to prevent very real suffering in family groups stricken
with the misfortune of loss of work b y the father.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E FIELD OF T H E ST U D Y .
PURPOSE.

For a large proportion of the families of this country, food and
shelter and all the other things necessary to the maintenance of a
fairly adequate standard of life are so contingent upon steady em­
ployment that loss of income for even a very short time may spell
deprivation or actual hardship. The present study was undertaken
during a period when many sections of the country were suffering
from serious industrial depression,1 and its purpose was to secure
such concrete first-hand information as could be obtained with refer­
ence to the effect of the father’s unemployment on the welfare of
his children.
In certain localities unemployment had been prevalent for many
months, and all grades of workers had suffered— the skilled as well
as the laborers and casual workers. In some types of industries the
shutdown followed closely the unusual activity of the war years.
The high wages that had prevailed had been largely offset b y the higher
living costs and the fever for spending which usually accompanies a
sudden increase in income. Many workers who probably for the
first time in their lives found themselves with earnings which per­
mitted a margin for luxuries spent them for more comfortable liv­
ing, and for automobiles, pianos, phonographs, or other means of
recreation that served as an outlet for the tension of the times.
There were, however, many families that put the surplus income
into payments on homes, bank accounts, Liberty bonds, or otherforms of savings which helped them to tide over the period of unem­
ployment. Because of the increased populations in the centers of
war activity, it had been necessary for large numbers of families to
undertake to buy homes in order to be assured of a place to live.
Loss of work found many of these families suddenly deprived of
their incomes while they were burdened b y obligations assumed
when earning conditions were favorable. Sometimes their acquisi­
tions could be turned into assets, though often at considerably
depreciated values.
Employment that had been plentiful for men, women, and children
of working age came to be at a premium for both adults and children
in the unemployment areas. There was slight possibility of making
up for the loss of the father’s income through the earnings of the
mother or the children. The situation was thus not without con1The field work of this study was done between Dec. 5,1921, and Feb. 28,1922.

5

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

6

U N E M PLO Y M E N T AND

C H IL D W E L F A R E .

structive features, which must be given due weight. Women,
many of them with families needing their care at home, had gone
into industry during the war because of the demand for workers and
the high pay offered; they now found it difficult to secure work of
any kind. Boys and girls 14 years of age and over were no longer
induced b y unprecedented wages to leave school and go to work,
and many working children were compelled to return to the educa­
tional system. Unfortunately, the deprivations resulting from the
loss of employment by the father as well as by the other wage­
earning members of the family often outweighed the better chances
for schooling and the advantages of the mother’s care in the home.
In this study an effort was made to discover the relation between
the unemployment situation and the more or less definable factors
of child welfare, using this term as applying not merely to conditions
related to the individual child but also to his welfare as a member
of a family group affected by the father’s unemployment. The
most definite criterion of the results of unemployment is, of course,
dependency, interpreted to include not only child dependency but
the need of the family for outside aid. Even dependency, however,
is not so significant a phase of the problem as the less clearly defined
condition of “ half rations” and deprivation of accustomed comforts
among families that do not apply for charitable aid. Relief agencies
report tremendous drains on their resources when periods of unem­
ployment occur in their localities, and point out how quickly many
families are brought to the need of outside aid when wages are cut off.
Some families manage, without assistance, to survive the period of
stress b y living under such conditions of lowered standards and
deprivation of ordinary comforts that the children suffer very real—
harm.
While this report includes certain statistical facts in regard to the
families that make up the unemployed groups, as a necessary general
basis for consideration of the child-welfare problem, the purpose of
the inquiry was to throw as much light as possible upon the extent
to which the father’s loss of work affected the well-being of his chil­
dren. Such human facts as those related to the lowering of living
standards and other special hardships coincident with a reduction in
the family income, can be analyzed to only a limited extent by the
statistical method; they must be dealt with in the main by the “ case
method,” presenting the combinations of elements in the conditions
of various representative families.
CITIES INCLUDED.

Reasons for selection.

The study of unemployment was made in two cities located in
different parts of the country and having somewhat different indus-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F IE L D OF T H E

7

STUDY.

trial backgrounds— Racine, Wis., and Springfield, Mass. Both cities
were reported by the United States Employment Service as having
serious unemployment. The first was rated as having a situation
that was as severe as any in the country; in the second city the
industrial depression was less general, though affecting a large
number of men over a considerable period of time. These cities
were chosen for the study also because their populations included
a number of nationalities and represented a variety of social and
economic conditions.
Racine, Wis., had in 1920 a population of over 58,000. When the
study was undertaken the unemployment situation had been serious
for more than a year. Springfield, Mass., had a population of
almost 130,000. At the time this city was visited, unemployment
had been prevalent for about 10 months.
Among the leading industries in Racine were manufacture of agri­
cultural implements, foundries and machine shops, manufacture of
automobiles and automobile parts, electrical-machine apparatus and
supplies, boots and shoes, trunks, furniture, and hardware. In
Springfield, the main industries were foundry and machine shops,
manufacture of electrical-machine apparatus and supplies, brass
and bronze products, automobile bodies and parts, stationery,
sporting goods, and games and toys.
Extent o f unemployment.

Racine.— The estimates given in regard to the number of unem­
ployed men indicated that the total was somewhere between 10,000
and 12,000. This apparently included a considerable number of
single men, many of whom had come to the city when workers were
in demand and had left when they lost their jobs. It was impossible
to secure a fair estimate of the probable proportion of unemployed
men in the city at the time the study was made. The following
data secured from the Wisconsin Industrial Commission in regard
to the numbers of workers in three Racine factories give an indi­
cation of the unemployment situation:
Plant No. 1:
M en employed July, 1920.........................................................................

948

M en em ployed October, 1921..................................................................

199

P lant No.

2:

M en employed Ju ly, 1920......................................................... |.............4, 382
M en employed October, 1921..................................................................

824

P lant No. 3:
M en em ployed July, 1920.........................................................................

1, 291

M en employed October, 1921............................................................. ....

484

The manufacturers’ association had compiled a chart on which
were plotted figures from the reports of 70 factories giving monthly
4 90 9 0°— 23------ 2


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

8

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

information to the association on the number of employees.
following figures were given:

The

Month and year.
Employees.
March, 1920..................................... 19,351— The em ploym ent peak.
A pril, 1921.......................................

9 ,21 5 — 52 per cent less than the peak.

June, 1921........................................

7, 785— 60 per cent less than the peak.

August, 1921...................................

6 ,41 5 — 67 per cent less than the peak.

October, 1921..................................

6 ,60 0 — 66 per cent less than the peak.

December, 1 9 2 1 . . . . - ..................

6 ,19 2 — 68 per cent less than the peak.

The reports made by the State and city employment office on the
number of registrations for jobs give something of a guide to the
situation, though one not entirely reliable because of the fact that
when jobs are very scarce men do not keep on applying.
Springfield.— No definite data on the extent of unemployment
could be secured for Springfield. Excerpts from the Industrial Em­
ployment Survey Bulletin, published monthly b y the Employment
Service of the United States Department of Labor, give a general indi­
cation of the situation in the city. The bulletin published in April,
1921, states: “ There is much unemployment in the metal and build­
ing trades, and in the textile, paper, motor-vehicle, and motoraccessories industries. A large rubber company in this vicinity nor­
mally employing 5,000, now employing 1,600, has increased working
schedule from 32 to 48 hours a week.” May, 1921: “ A large motorvehicle plant employing 900 is working three days a week, with pros­
pects for improvement not promising. A large tool plant is closed
indefinitely. A machine tool plant, closed for one week, has reopened
and is working three days a week with a small force. A large plant#
engaged in manufacturing games and toys has reduced its force from
550 to 400.” June, 1921: “ Unemployment continues in metal and
building trades.” July, 1921: “ Unemployment is general in all lines.
The mayor of Springfield has appointed a committee to devise ways
and means of relieving the situation. Textiles are working full time,
but with reduced forces. Manufacturing plants are running with
greatly reduced forces.” August, 1921: “ There is much unemploy­
ment in the metal trades and paper industry, while part time prevails
in nearly all plants.” November, 1921: “ The general opinion of
those engaged in business is that the next three months will show a
slow but steady improvement. The metal trades show the largest
unemployment. There is no activity in the building trades. A large
firearms plant is closed, affecting 800. An automobile plant has but
few working. Paper has shown some improvement. Paper-box
workers advertising for night crews. Certain textiles report shortage
of skilled help.” December, 1921: “ Metal trades are very quiet.
One large industry, employing 1,000 hands, is about to lay off 200.
Two plants, employing 1,250, are still closed. Paper and textiles
show a steady upward trend. Railroad shops are on full time. Iron

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F IE L D OF T H E S T U D Y .

9

foundries are good. Auto-tire industry very busy.” January, 1922:
“ Ice cutting, now at its height, will give employment to hundreds
of men for several weeks. Unemployment conditions improved in
some industries, but the metal trades continue to be the hardest hit.
Building trades are dull, with indications of improvement in the
spring. One drop-forge plant is practically closed, affecting about
500 hands. One plant manufacturing small arms closed, about 270
affected. * * * One textile plant which was closed has reopened.
One concern, closed since last July, with a normal force of 825, has
reopened with a force of 250 men. One plant manufacturing agri­
cultural implements closed, affecting about 150.”
M easures taken to provide employment.

Racine.— In August, 1921, the city of Racine appropriated $150,000
for road work, bridge building, and park work, in order to relieve the
unemployment situation. The selection of the men for this work
was placed in the hands of the State and city employment office.
The superintendent of the employment office reported that a chance
at this city work had been given to about 500 men a week, the usual
policy being one week of employment and two weeks off. Some­
times a man was given work for two or three weeks in succession,
with a proportionate period of unemployment following. The pay
was 35 cents an hour. Park work was for 9 hours a day and street
work for 8 hours. It was stated b y the employment office that the
men averaged about 5 days a week when employed, and their pay
averaged about $15 a week. The employment office received between
200 and 300 applications a day for work on the streets and in the
parks; a large proportion of these men had been skilled factory
workers.
Springfield.— In August, 1921, the mayor of Springfield put into
operation a plan for city employment, and an appropriation of $5,000
was made for special work by the street and park departments for the
month of August. This work was continued, and the amount available
for wages was increased as needed. The expenditures for the city
work ran from $4,000 to $6,000 a month, except in December, 1921,
when wages amounted to more than $18,000. This was not due to
increase in unemployment, but was to be accounted for almost
entirely by the policy of giving employment to as many men as possi­
ble during the Christmas season. The distribution of this special
city work was placed in the Soldiers’ Relief Office, and investigations
were made in all cases by the Union Relief Association, which reported
to the employment office. Employment was limited to men with
dependent children or with more than one adult dependent on them.
The work was given for 5 hours a day, 6 days a week, usually 120
hours at a time. Then the man was laid off, and reemployment de-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

10

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

pended on the number of applications on hand. Usually there
was about a week’s interim. The wages were $12 for 30 hours’ work.
It was stated at the employment office that the average amount
earned by the men was about $10 a week, because bad weather and
other conditions interfered with steady work. From August through
November, 1921, there were 975 applications for work, of which 213
were disapproved because of absence of dependents living in the city,
residence in the city for less than a year, or for some other reason.
By February 15,1,017 men had been given city work through the emer­
gency employment office.
SOURCES OF IN FO RM ATIO N .

General information in regard to the unemployment in the two
cities and the basic data for the various sections of the study were
obtained from the following sources, effort being directed toward
securing facts which bore a special relation to the welfare of the chil­
dren of unemployed men.
1. State and city employment offices.
2. City officials and others concerned with special efforts to
relieve the unemployment situation.
3. Manufacturers’ associations and committees dealing with the
problem.
4. Industrial concerns affected, and especially welfare workers
of factories giving assistance to families of employees.
5. Public and private relief agencies, visiting nurse associations,
and other organizations assisting families.
6. Offices issuing employment certificates, and vocational or
continuation schools attended by working children.
7. Child-welfare agencies, including the juvenile court, the
agency administering mothers’ pensions, children’s aid and
protective societies, institutions for dependent children.
The inquiry differed somewhat in the two cities, in accordance with
the features of the situation that appeared especially significant in
each place. Aside from the general information concerning the back­
ground, the study included the following main divisions:
A. Schedules secured through interviews with families of unem­
ployed men.
B. Data from records of relief agencies concerning families given
assistance because of unemployment.
C. Data from employment-office records relating to men with
dependent children.
D. Comparative data on the extent of child labor, and the effect
of the unemployment situation on schooling.
By far the most important part of the inquiry was the securing of
direct information from 366 families of unemployed men. The re
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F IE L D OF T H E S T U D Y .

11

suiting schedules yielded information pertaining to all phases of the
study, and since the group of families visited in each city was selected
as fairly representative of the “ average run” of families affected by
unemployment, this material is especially significant. In Racine a
cross-section study was made of unemployment cases in the records of
a large private relief agency. In Springfield an analysis was made of
the data recorded concerning the men with dependent children who
applied for emergency city work. In both cities studies were made
of the child-labor situation, comparing the period of industrial de­
pression with preceding years. Certain other special phases of the
problem were considered— employment of mothers, health conditions
in the families during the unemployment period, juvenile delinquency,
and dependency, and the credit granted by retail stores as a substi­
tute for charitable aid in tiding the family over the period of unem­
ployment.
Because of the differences inherent in the industrial and social
conditions in the two cities, it is necessary to present separately the
analysis of the general statistical data relating to the families in each
city. Under special topics, however, the data from the two cities are
dealt with together. It has already been pointed out that the real
meaning of the misfortune of unemployment can best be shown,
through the presentation of the situations in individual families are
presented, and the coincidence of various factors that affect the
welfare of the children in these families.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

TH E

FAM ILIE S

OF

TH E

U N EM PLO YED .

The section relating to the home conditions of unemployed men
constituted the main part of the inquiry, both because of the relative
importance of the data and the time expended in securing the first­
hand information from the families. A total of 366 families in the
two cities were visited b y agents of the Children’s Bureau, and infor­
mation was obtained from them in accordance with a prepared sched­
ule form.2 The study was confined to families in which there were
two or more children under 18 years of age living in the home. It
covered facts as to the father’s previous employment, the duration of
his unemployment, the composition of the family, home conditions,
resources of the family during the unemployment period, special handi­
caps under which the family was suffering, the losses suffered, debts
accumulated, and the extent of retrenchment in their manner of living.
In order to be of value for the purpose intended, it was necessary
that the group of families selected for scheduling should be repre­
sentative of the general run of families of unemployed men, and not
overweighted by families known to social agencies or from the lower
occupational groups. In both cities representative fists of unem­
ployed men with dependent children could best be secured from the
records of the State and city employment offices. While in times of
normal industrial conditions laborers and casual workers would prob­
ably predominate in the applications for work, the unemployment
periods in both cities had been of such long duration, and all classes
of workers had been affected so seriously, that the danger was rather
that the fists of families might include an undue proportion of skilled
workers. This was the case especially in one city, where applications
by laborers were not being recorded at the time of the inquiry, be­
cause these jobs were filled by any men who happened to be in the
employment office at the time of the infrequent applications for such
workers. Overweighting was guarded against in so far as it was
possible to do so.
For the most part, families were selected for study in which the
father had been out of regular work for at least six months. In
Racine only 3 per cent and in Springfield 10 per cent of the fathers
of the families included in the study had lost their regular employ­
ment less than six months before the agent’s visit. On the other
hand, in 71 per cent of the families included in Racine and in 48 per
cent of those included in Springfield the unemployment of the father
had been of a year’s duration or longer. As defined in the instruc» For schedule form see p. 169.

13


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

14

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A E E .

.tions to the agents, the unemployment period was held to cover the
time from the loss of the man’s regular work; during this period he
might have had temporary work at other occupations than his trade
or usual employment.
The lists of families selected in this way from the employment-office
records were “ cleared” through the records of public and private
relief organizations, children’s agencies, and other sources of informa­
tion that might supplement the data secured directly from the famiCHARTI.

A G E S OE CHILDREN IN TAMILI E S OF
UNEMPLOYED MEN
1315 CHILDREN IN 36 6 FAMILIES DM TW O C ITIE S

lies. The person interviewed in the home was either the father or
the mother; frequently both were seen. The agents were instructed
not to attempt to secure any information unless the family under­
stood the purpose of the inquiry and was interested in assisting. The
instructions to the field agents contained the following paragraph:
T h e purpose of the in qu iry is to discover what happened to the fam ily— especially
the children— as a result of the unem ploym ent of the father.

T h e statistical items

are important as furnishing a background for analysis of the situation, b u t the most
valuable part of the material w ill b e information that shows w hat unem ploym ent
means in hum an terms.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

15

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

RACINE, W IS.3

Duration o f unemployment.

At the time the study was undertaken there had been a serious
unemployment problem in Racine for about a year and a half. In
this city 231 representative families were selected for study, in
accordance with the plan already outlined. For only 3 per cent of
these had the lack of regular employment of the chief breadwinner
covered a period of less than six months; for 26 per cent the un­
employment had continued for from six months up to a year, for
67 per cent for from a year to a year and a half, and for 4 per cent
for still longer periods. The details of the duration of unemploy­
ment in months are as follows:
Duration of unemployment.
Number of fathers.
T otal................................................................................... ................. ............. 231
Less than 4 m o n th s...................................................................................................
5 m onths........................................................................................................................
6 months..................................................................
7 months....... ............... ....................................... ................................ . . . ..................
8 months...........................................................................
9 m onths.............................................. . : ................... .................................................
10 months............................................... - ....................- ..............................................
11 m onths......................................................................................................................
12 m onths.................................................................................. . . . . .............................
13 m onths......................................................................................
14 m onths.....................................................................................................
15 m onths......................................................................................................................
16 m onths..........................
17 m onths.................
18 m ohths......................
19 m onths......... ................................
20 months........................................................ ........................................................ . .
21 months..................................................................
22 m onths......................................................................................................................
N ot reported.................................................................................

2
5
3
11
17
10

8
10
40
24
31
29
18
11
4
2

1
1
1
3

Number o f children affected.

In the 231 families there were 823 children under 18 years of age
living at home. As the following list shows, almost half of these
children (48 per cent) were under 7 years of age. Those from between
7 and 14 years of age comprised 42 per cent, and 10 per cent were
14 years of age or over.
Ages of children.
Number of children.
T otal................................................................................................................... 823
Under 1 y e a r ...............................................................................................................

48

1

51

year...........................................................................................................................

* See Appendix A , Tables 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17, and 22.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

16

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .
Ages of children.

*

Number of children.

2 years..............

.................

3 years..............

.........................

55

4 years..............

- - : ......................

60

5 years_______

............: ...........

62

6 years..............

.........................

67

7 years..............

8 years..............

.........................
.........................

57
51

9 years..............

.........................

57

10 years.
11 y^ars.
12 years............

..............

49

49

.........................

45

- - .....................

49
43

13 years............

.........................

14 years............

.........................

29

15 years............

................... ..

20

16 years............

.........................

17

17 years...........

.........................

14

The age distribution of the children did not differ materially from
that of the children under 18 years of age in the general population,
except that there were proportionately fewer children of possible
working age in the families of the unemployed, as is shown by the
following figures:3“
Per cent
distribution
Per cent
in families
distribution
of unemployed
in general
men.
population.

Ages of children.
T o t a l...

..... 100

Under 7 years
7 -1 3 y e a r s .. . .
14-15 y e a r s .. .
16-17 y e a r s .. .

------_____
....
-------

48
42

6
4

100
45
37
9
9

Two-fifths of the 231 families had more than three children. The
following list gives the number of children under 18 years of age in
each family:
-Number of children
under 18 years.
Number of families.
T o ta l......................... .................................................................... .................... 231

2.
3.
4.
5.

6.
7:

8.
10

65
72
32
36
18
5

2

1

General facts concerning the fathers.

Most of the fathers in this group of families were young men; 58
per cent were under 40 years of age, 49 per cent being between 30 and
40. Thirty-three per cent Were from 40 to 50; 9 per cent were over
3 “ The smaller proportions in the upper age groups in the families studied are due in part to the
limitation to families with two children under 18 years of age.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E

17

U N EM PLO YED.

50. Nineteen fathers were from 50 to 60 years old, and 3 were 60
or oyer.
Among the unemployed men included in the study the proportion
of foreign born was much larger than among the males 21 years of
age or over in the general population of the city— the comparative
percentages being 77 and 45. Of the foreign-bom fathers, however,
85 per cent had been in the United States for 10 years or longer
and only 1 for less than 5 years. The length of time the 179 foreignborn fathers had been in the United States is shown in the following
list:
Length of residence in the
Number of foreignTJnited States.
bom fathers.
T otal................................................................................................................... 179
Less than 5 years.......................................................................................................

1

5 -9 years........................................................................................................................

25

1 0-14 years.....................................

52

15-19 years............................

60

2 0-24 years.....................................................................................

20

25 years and o v e r....................................................................

20

N ot reported.................................................................................................................

1

Four-fifths of these fathers had become citizens or had taken out
their first papers.
More than half of the 231 men had been residents of the city for
10 years or more, only 6 had lived there for less than two years.
The following list gives the length of residence in the city:
Number
Length of residence in city.
of fathers.
T otal...................................................................................................................... 231

1 year...............................................................................................................................
2 -3 years.............................................................................................

6
29

4 -5 years.........................................................................................................................

16

6 -7 years.........................................................................................................................

23

8 -9 years......................

10 years and over.....................................................................
N o t reported.................................................................................................................

35

121
1

All the native-born fathers were reported as able to read and
write. Of the foreign-bom, 13 per cent were reported as illiterate,
but only 2 men were unable to speak English.
Previous work status o f fathers.

Almost three-fourths of the unemployed men had previously been
skilled workers in regular trades or semiskilled operatives, and onefourth had been unskilled workers; only two men had been casual
laborers. A greater proportion of the native bom and those who
had been in the United States for 20 years or over were rated as
skilled workers than of those who had been in the oountry for a
shorter period— that is, 84 per cent as against 67 per cent. The
majority of the men had been employed in manufacturing or me
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

18

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

chanical occupations.
reported by the men:

The following list gives the occupations as

Last regular occupation before unemployment.
of fathers.
T otal........., ......................................................................................... .............231

49
34
Machinist.........................................
32
Assembler...................................
13
Machine operative...............................................
11
Blacksm ith, forge or hammer m a n ...............................................................
7
Truckers and drivers................................................................................................
7
Coremaker...........................................
5
Mechanic............................
5
Tool and pattern maker...........................................................................................
4
Riveter...........................................
3
Bench worker..................................
3
W elder.........................................................
3
Blacksm ith’s helper..................................................................................
3
Painter, vam isher, and sander...................................................
3
Filer, polisher, and buffer.................................................................
2
Miscellaneous manufacturing and mechanical.........................
33
A ll other............................................................................
14
Laborer in factory............. .......................... .............................................. ..........._ .

Molder and caster...................................... ...............i ..............................................

The father’s monthly wages in his last regular employment are
shown below:
,,,
.
Monthly earnings.
Total............................

,

Number
of fathers.
231

Less than $100.............................................................................................
$100, less than $125...................................................................... . . . ____ . . . . . .

27
58

$125, less than $150......................................... ............. ............................................

48

$150, less than $175.......................................................................................
$175, less than $200........................................................................ ......... ............
$200, less than $225...................................................................................................
$225, less than $250................. .............................................................................
$250 and over.....................................................................................................
N ot reported..........................................................................

29
22

14
9
1
23

It is seen that prior to the loss of employment more than a third
of the families included in the inquiry had had a monthly income of
$150 or over through the earnings of the chief breadwinner. The
wages of more than one-tenth of the heads of families had been $200
or more a month.
Ninety per cent of the men stated that their loss of employment
was caused by shutdown of the factory or “ lay-off” of workers. In
seven cases illness was given as the active cause; in three, “ trouble
with the boss or company,” and various reasons were alleged in the
remaining cases.
Ownership o f hom e.

Ownership of homes had been almost a necessity, in order to be
assured of a place to live during the period of congestion of popula
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S

OF T H E

19

UNEM PLOYED.

tion in war time. It was found that more than three-fifths of the
families studied had bought their houses, only 29 per cent of these
having acquired them before the war period. The true situation,
however, is shown by the fact that payments had been completed
on only 6 per cent of these “ owned” homes, while 94 per cent were
mortgaged. Two of the 9 families who owned their homes free of
encumbrance had lived in them 10 years or longer, 5 for from 5 to 9
years, 1 for 4 years, and 1 for 3 years. Seven of them had presum­
ably bought the homes before the war period. On the other hand,
almost half the families whose homes were mortgaged had lived in
them for less than 3 years. Of the families who were renters, nearly
three-fourths had lived in the same house for less than 3 years. On
the whole, the families of unemployed men represented fairly steady
residents, for only 23 per cent of them had moved into their present
living quarters within a year. Following are the details as to length
of residence in the homes occupied at the time of the investigation:
Length of time in house.
T otal.................

Families Families
owning renting
homes. homes.
. . . 145
86

Less than 6 m onths.
6 m onths......... ............
1 year............................
2 y e a r s ........................

..
..
..
..

3 years..........................
4 years------ 1 . . . . .
5 -9 years......................
10 years and o v e r . ..
T im e not re p o r te d ..

...
...
..
..
..

2

26

3
25
33

20
11

30

6
32
9
5

7
3
9
7

1
2

Seven of the families who had previously owned their homes, pre­
sumably mortgaged, had been compelled to give them up and to
become renters. Four families, on the other hand, who had been
renting, had had to buy homes because of the housing situation and
had invested their savings in this way during the unemployment
period.
Housing conditions.

Housing conditions in this city were not such as to necessitate
overcrowding under normal conditions, and at the time of the investi­
gation 50 per cent of the families had a housing standard of one or
more rooms per person; 45 per cent of the families averaged between
one and two persons per room, 4 per cent averaged between two and
three per room, and 1 per cent three or more persons per room. In
view of the large proportion of owners as compared with renters, the
crowding that was found is no doubt to be accounted for largely by
the custom of letting rooms or taking in boarders to eke out the
family resources. In five instances the overcrowding was particu­
larly serious. A family with six members lived in a single room.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

20

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Another of the same size occupied only two rooms. A family of eight
persons had three rooms, and each of two families with nine members
lived in four-room apartments.
Rents paid.

Nearly three-fourths of the families renting their homes paid a
rental of between $10 and $20 a month. Four-fifths of the families
giving information on the amount of rent paid lived in houses or
“ flats” having four or more rooms; three-fourths of these families,
also, were in the $10 to $20 rent group.
The amounts paid at the time of the visits to these families—in
December, 1921, or January, 1922—were as follows:
*
. .
. •
Amount of rent per month.

Number
of families
renting.

Total......................................................................................
Less than

$10........................................................................................................ . .

86
4

$10, less than $15....................................................................................... ...............

28

$15, less than $20........................................................................................................

36

$ 20, less than $ 2 5 ..............................................
$25, less than $30.................................................................................................... .

10
5

$ 3 0 -$ 3 5 .......................................................................................................................

3

The difficulties which loss of steady income entailed are indicated
by the fact that of the 86 families who rented their homes at the time
of the study 7 had owned homes before unemployment and had had
to give them up; 1 family remained in the house and was paying
rent, and 6 had moved to rented quarters. Forty-eight other fam­
ilies moved during the unemployment period, some of them to
quarters having lower rents, and others apparently because “ it was
cheaper to move than pay rent.” Of the families who had moved,
25 were paying lower rents at the time of the study than they had
paid before unemployment; 5 were paying more than they had done
while the father was working; and 13 were paying approximately
the same as before. Four f amibes had moved from rented houses
to homes which they had had to buy. Complete information was
not obtained in regard to amount of rent paid by one family.
Of the 35 families who rented previously and had not moved,
7 were paying less than they had done while the father was working,
and for 26 families the rents were approximately the same before
and during the unemployment period. For 2 families information
was not obtained as to the amount of rent paid.
In connection with the rentals reported above, it is important to
remember that three-fifths of the families visited in Racine had
boifght their homes. It may well be assumed that the renters repre­
sent to a considerable extent the families of a lower economic status,
and those who could not afford to make the payments necessary to
“ ow n” a home. The estimates made by one of the large manufac-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

21

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

t r ir in g c o n c e r n s i n t h e c i t y o f t h e b u d g e t s r e q u i r e d f o r w o r k i n g m e n ’ s
fa m ilie s , b a s e d

on

d a ta

secu red fr o m

fa m ilie s

o f th e ir e m p lo y e e s ,

p l a c e d t h e a m o u n t o f r e n t a t $ 3 0 .4

CHART H.

DURATION OF UNEM PLOYM ENT
3 5 6 FAMILIES IN TWO CITIES, REPORTING DURATION
OF FATHERS UNEMPLOYMENT

58°/.

5%

5°/«

12to 17
18to 25
Under6
6 to l
months
months
months
months
If it had been possible to ascertain the average monthly amounts
paid out b y the families who had bought their homes and were pay­
ing interest and principal on the mortgages, the figures on cost of
housing would undoubtedly have been found to equal or exceed the
amount given in the budget estimate.
* See budget estimate, p. 37.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

22

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

SPRINGFIELD, M A SS.5

Duration of unemployment.
In Springfield 135 families were visited. Almost half the fathers
had been out of work for a year or longer. Ten per cent had been
unemployed for less than 6 months, 42 per cent for from 6 months
to a year, and 48 per cent for a year or more. These percentages
contrast strongly with the 3 per cent, 26 per cent, and 67 per cent
unemployed for the corresponding periods in Racine. It is seen
that the unemployment situation in Springfield had been much less
serious than in the first city studied.
Duration of unemployment.

Number of fathers.

Total................................................................................135
Less than 4 months.................
9
4 months..................
2
2
5 months............................................................ ....... . . . ..........
6 months......... . ....... . . .......... -............... ................................. 10
7 months..................................................................
15
8 months.................... |............................................................. 9
9 months...........................
12
10 months................. .... .....................-............. .....................
6
2
11 months.....................
12 months................. . . . . . ................ ................. .....................
6
13 months................. ................................- ............................. 16
14 months.......................................................... -..................... 14
15 months............................... .................... ..........................- - 8
16 months..................
4
17 months..............................
5
18 months..................
1
19 months.....................
3
24 months....................................................
2
25 months.....................................................-...........................
2
Not reported......................
7
Number of children affected.
The 135 families of unemployed men included 492 children under
18 years of age living at home. Forty-three per cent of these chil­
dren were under 7, and 43 per cent were from 7 through 13 years of
age; 14 per cent were 14 years or over. The corresponding per­
centages for Racine were very nearly the same— 48, 42, and 10.
The numbers of children of each specific age are shown below:
Ages of children.

Total..................................................

Number of children.

492

Under 1 year................................................
1 year.......................................................
2 years............................................ -.......................- ............... 34
3 years........, .................. -......................................................... 34
4 years.................................. . .......... ........................................ 28
6 See Appendix A, Tables 2, 4, 6, 8,10.12,14,16,18, and 22.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

23

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.
Ages of children.

Number of children.

5 years..........
6 years___
7 years.........
8 years....... .
9 years.........
10 years.......
11 years.......
12 years........
13 years.......
14 years.......
15 years.......
16 years.......
17 years.......

.................
.................
1

32
28

...............

41

.................

29

.........................

29

.................

34

....... il..........

22

.................

30

A .....................

27

.................
...... ..........

18
22

.........................

16

________ _ 12

The following list shows that the proportion of children of working
age was smaller in the group of families studied than in the general
population of the city— 14 per cent as against 18 per cent.
Per cent
distribution
in families
of unemployed
men.

Ages of children.
T o ta l...

......... 100

Per cent
distribution
in general
population.

100

Under 7 years.

43

45

7 -1 3 years____

43

37

1-4-15 y e a r s .. .

8
6

9

16-17 years___

9

In 49 per cent of the 135 families there were more than three
children living at home. Seventeen families had six or more children.
Number of children
Number of
under 18 years.
families.
T otal............................................................................................................ — 135
2

3

.................

45

..................

25

4 . .................

5 . . . .............
6 ......................

27

............ .......................................... ............................

7 . ...................................... *........................

21
9

............................. - .................................

8 ................ ........................................... ... .........................................................

................................................

- .................................. -

9 ................................ . . . ...................................................................................................

5

2
1

General facts concerning the fathers.

More than half the fathers whose ages were given (54 per cent)
were under 40 years of age, the greater proportion being between 30
and 40 years. Of the 128 men, only 10 were between 50 and 60 years,
and 1 man was over 60. Eight of these 11 older men had been out
of work for periods ranging from 13 to 25 months. Of the men
under 50 years of age, 40 per cent had been out of work for 13 months
or longer.
In the general population of the city the foreign bom represented
36 per cent of the white males 21 years of age and over. Among the
4 9 0 9 0 °— 23-------3


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

24

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

group of unemployed men, on the other hand, 54 per cent were of
foreign birth. However, more than two-thirds of the 73 foreignbom men had been in the United States for 15 years or over, and
only 8 had been in this country for less than 10 years.
Length of residence
in the United States.
T otal..........

Number of foreignhorn fathers.
....................... 73

Less than 5 years
5 -9 years................

2
6

10-14 years............

14

15-19 years............

20

20-24 years............

15

25 years and over

15

N ot reported........

1

Only 48 per cent of the foreign-born fathers had become natural­
ized, but an additional 22 per cent had secured their first papers.
Thus, 30 per cent, as against 19 per cent in Racine, had taken no
step t o w a r d Americanization. It is interesting to note that more
than two-fifths of the men who had been in the United States for
15 years or longer had not become citizens, whereas more than threefifths of those who had resided here a shorter time had failed to
become naturalized.
The following list gives the length of residence in the city. It is
seen that the greater proportion had been residents for 10 years or
longer.
Length of residence
Number of
in city.
fathers.
T otal............... .................................................... ..................................... ..
135
Less than 1 y e a r .

1 y e a r .....................
2 years.....................

2
8
9

4 -5 years................

17

6 -7 years................

12

8 -9 years................
10 years and over

73

N o t reported........

12

2

As in Racine, all the native-born fathers were reported as literate.
Five of the 73 foreign born were found to be illiterate, while 18 could
read in their native language only. Only 1 man could not speak
English. Therefore, 17 per cent of all the men in the unemployed
group were handicapped by inability to read English.
Previous work status o f fathers.

By far the largest number of men (83 per cent) had been employed
in skilled occupations; 15 per cent were classed as unskilled workers,
and 2 per cent as casual laborers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

25

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

A list of the last regular occupations of the 135 men follows:
Last regular occupation
before unemployment.
T o t a l... . ............

Number of
fathers.
135

M achinist.......................................................................................................................
Laborer in factory........................................................... ................. ................... : .

33
9

Painter............... ................... . " . ........ ..........................................................................

7

Laborer, other........ ...................1 ............... . .............................................................

6

M older and caster........................................ ......................................... .............. . .

5

Truckers and drivers------ i ................. ...... ................ ..................... . . ..............

5

Tool and pattern m aker.......... ........................................................................

5

Assem bler................................................................................................. - - - .............

4

Clerical worker............................................................................................................

4

M achine operative........................................ - ........................................................

4

M echanic................................................................ - ............... (..................................Filer, polisher, and b u ffe r....................................................................
Miscellaneous mechanical and manufacturing.......................1 ...................

4
3

A ll other.....................................

39
7

In this city there was not found the distinction that might be
expected between the occupational status of the men who were bom
in the United States or who had been in this country for a consid­
erable number of years and those of foreign birth and more recent
arrival. The native bom and those who had been in the United
States for 20 years or over represented 69 per cent of the entire group;
84 per cent of them were classed as having been employed in skilled
trades. Of the 31 per cent who had been in this country for less
than 20 years, practically as large a proportion (81 per cent) had
also been in skilled occupations. The two casual laborers were native
bom .
The men who had been in the city 10 years and over comprised
practically the same proportion of all skilled workers as they did of
the entire group of unemployed men— 58 and 55 per cent, respec­
tively. Apparently, the occupational status had no direct relation
to the length of residence in the country or in the city.
More than one-fourth of the men had earned $150 or more a month
when regularly employed. The numbers in each monthly wage group
were as follows:
Monthly earnings.

Number of fathers.

Total............................. ........ ................... - - .................................... 135

Less than $100................................................ ................................. 21
$100, less than $125............................. ............................................ 38
$125, less than$150...................................... - ....................... ...... 35
$150, less than $175................................. - - , ...................................- 23
$175, less than $200.......................................... - ..............................
5
$200, less than $225...........................................................................
3
$225, less than $250................ .................- ..........- ................ .
2
$250 and over..................... .................... 1-. - ...........- ------ ------ - - - 1
Not reported................................................................................... . 7


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

26

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Practically all the men gave as the reason for their loss of employ*
ment the shutdown of the factory or the “ laying off” of workers.
One ascribed his lack of work to a strike; and in six cases illness was
the cause of unemployment.
Ownership o f home.

One-fifth of the families were reported as owning their homes, but
in every case there was a mortgage. In this city there had, appar­
ently, not been the same inducements for buying homes as had existed
in Racine during its period of increased" production and the con­
sequent crowding of the population. In the latter city more than
three-fifths of the families had bought their homes, a considerable
proportion of them before the war period, and a few owned their
homes free of mortgages.
*
Sixteen of the twenty-eight families who “ owned” mortgaged
homes had lived in them for less than five years, evidently having
bought them during the recent period of industrial prosperity. Of
the renters, almost a third had lived for less than a year in the resi­
dence occupied at the time of the study; only 16 per cent had lived in
the same place for five years or more.
Length of time in house.

Total...............

Families
owning
homes.
. . -28

Less than 6 m o n th s ... . ........................ - .............- - - - - - 6 months, under 1 year.......................................... 1..................—..
..
1 year............................................................ .....................

..
2 years........... ....................- - - ............................ ...................................

..
3 years......................................................................................................
..
4 years........................................................................- - .............
5-9 years......... .......................... ........................ ................. .................... .
..
10 years and over..............................................................- .................

..
T im e not reported.......... ................................... - - - - .......................

1
1
6

4
4
4
4
1
6
6

4
4
2
2

Families
renting
homes.

107
18
15
19
16
8
12
14
3
2

In Racine the greater proportion of the families were found at the
address given at the employment office. In Springfield, on the other
hand, more than one-third of the families could not be located
because they had moved from the address given, and though many
of them were traced to several subsequent addresses, their present
whereabouts was unknown to their former neighbors. Since so large
a majority of the families in this city were renters, it is probable that
difficulty in meeting payments of rent was largely responsible for
this shifting.
Housing conditions.

There were proportionately more families in Springfield than in
Racine living under crowded conditions. In 7 per cent of the families
there were between two and three persons per room, and in 1 per
cent three persons or more. The average was between one and two
persons to a room, in 51 per cent of the families. In 41 per cent of
the families there was one or less than one person per room.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M I L I E S OF T H E

27

UNEM PLOYED.

Rents paid.

Four-fifths of the families visited in Springfield were renters.
Information was obtained regarding the rents paid by these 107
families. The largest number paid from $20 to $25 a month. The
number of families paying rents of the different amounts follows:
Amount of rent per month.

Number of families renting.

Total..................... - .................. - ..........- - - - - - ....................... 107
Less than $ 1 0 . . . . ....... ............. ................ ........ ................... - - ...............
$10, less than $ 1 5 . . ............................ .................................................... ........ .. - - $15, less than $ 2 0 .............. ............... .......... ..

- - ..............- - ...........

$20, less than $ 2 5 .......... ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r -------- - - .......................- - - - -

I
15
25
32

$25, less than $ 3 0 .......... ...............- - - .............- - .....................................................

24

$30, less than $ 3 5 .................................... ........................................................... - - -

9

The majority of the families (87 per cent) lived in houses or “ tene­
ments” having four or more rooms, and two-thirds of these families
paid rents of $20 to $35.
It has been stated that there was considerable difficulty in finding
families whose addresses had been secured from the employment
offices, because of the frequent moving. The proportion of families
scheduled who had moved obviously does not represent the situation
as fairly as was the case in Racine. However, it is of interest to
note that 1 family formerly owning its home had moved after unem­
ployment, and of 29 others who had moved, 5 were paying lower
rents and 7 higher rents than when the father was working; 12 were
paying approximately the same rent in the new quarters, and for
5 there was insufficient information.
Of the 77 renters who had not moved, 4 were paying less for rent
at the time of the study than they had paid when the father was
working; 6 were paying higher rent during the time of unemploy­
ment ; 59 were paying approximately the same, and there was insuffi­
cient information concerning 8.
RESOURCES DURING U NEM PLOYM ENT.6

Sources of livelihood.

Through emergency work provided by the two cities, and through
other short-time jobs secured by their own efforts or assigned to them
by employment offices, all but 4 of the 366 men whose families were
visited had been able to earn something toward the support of their
families during the months that followed the loss of their regular
occupations. The inadequacy of these earnings, by men who had
previously been the sole or main support of their families, is shown
b y the facts presented in regard to the sources of livelihood during
unemployment. Whereas only 32 of the mothers had worked prior
to the unemployment period, in spite of the incentive offered by the
« See Appendix A, Tables 17-24, inclusive.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

28

U N E M PLO Y M E N T AND

C H IL D W E L F A E E .

war activities, 91 who had not previously fork ed had secured em­
ployment after their husbands had lost their jobs. All but 7 of those
previously employed had had some work during the unemployment
of the fathers, making a total of 116 mothers who supplemented the
family income to some extent. This number would undoubtedly
chart

m.

PERCENTAGES O F FAMILIES REPORTING
V A R IO U S SOURCES OF M A IN T E N A N C E
DURING THE FATHERS’ UNEM PLOYM ENT
566 FAMILIES IN TWO CITIES

100%

Percentage
of families
reporting
e ac h
so u rc e

Mothers* Children’s? Savings
Credit Charitable
Earnings Earnings Used and Loans Aid
have been much larger had not employment been even more scarce
for women than for men.
There had been a slight increase in the proportion of families that
kept boarders or lodgers or rented parts of their houses during the
period of unemployment. That this increase was not greater is
readily accounted for by the unusual demand for housing accommo­
dations during the preceding period, and the consequently decreased

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

29

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

opportunities for this type of income during the time of industrial
depression. In Racine approximately 5,000 single men who had
come in when labor was in demand were said to have left the city
when they were thrown out of work. That the proportion of families
keeping boarders and lodgers was as large as it was found to be is
indicative of the unusual efforts made by them to gain means of
subsistence.
Only 30 of the 191 families who were compelled to apply for chari­
table aid at this period had previously needed such assistance.
Loans, frequently obtained on very disadvantageous terms; debts
contracted, especially for rent, food, clothing, and medical attend­
ance; aid from relatives; and the expenditure of savings— these were
other means of support for the families of the unemployed.
The following list gives the number and per cent of the 366 families
reporting the various sources of livelihood during the unemployment
period. Instead of specifying the many confusing combinations of
sources, the items are given separately, with the percentage of families
reporting each source. Many, and sometimes all, of the sources were
found to have been used by a considerable number of the families.
Number of
families
Sources of livelihood.
reporting,
T otal.................................................. . . ............... ............................... 366
Father’s earnings at temporary work........ ....................................... 362
Mother’s earnings.......................................................................................... 116

v
Per
cent.
100
99
32

F am ings of children................ ............. i ................................................
Incom e from boarders and lodgers............ .........................................

75
56

Income from rent.......................................................................................

60

16

Savings used........................................................... - ................................... 158

43

Loans contracted.........................

117

20
15

32

D ebts for food................................ .........................................................- - 240

66

Other debts.......... ...................- ................................................................- 253

69

A id from relatives.............................. ..................................... - - - ...........

38

10

191

52

15

4

Charitable a id ...................................
Other sources........ .......................

Sixty-six per cent of the families had gone into debt for food.
In Racine, where unemployment had been of longer duration, 81 per
cent of the families reported debts for food, while in Springfield the
proportion was less than half as large. Loans and other debts,
exclusive of credit for food, reported by more than three-fourths of
all the families,, formed the largest source of maintenance, both as to
aggregate amount and the number of families reporting them. The
percentage of such families in Racine was 82, as compared with 66 in
Springfield. The use of savings, on the other hand, was reported by
almost the same proportion of the families visited in each city— 42 per
cent in the first city, and 45 per cent in the second. More than a
tenth of the families had received aid from relatives. The families
in Springfield appeared to have had the greater resources from this

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

so

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

type of aid— almost three times the proportion of families found in
Racine— and this no doubt explains to some extent the lower pro­
portions of loans and debts reported in Springfield. More than half
the total families visited in the two cities were given assistance by
public or private relief agencies. In Racine 61 per cent of the families
received such aid, and in Springfield 37 per cent. This, again, is
apparently to be accounted for by the longer duration and more
wide-spread unemployment in the first city.
In addition to showing the variety of ways in which the families
of unemployed men had been forced to secure the means of subsist­
ence, these figures are especially significant for two other reasons.
First, 191 of the 366 families (52 per cent) had become partially
dependent upon charitable aid, presumably after other resources had
been exhausted. Second, a large proportion of the families— 278, or
76 per cent of the entire number—had been forced to mortgage the
future through loans and other debts.
Proportions o f total maintenance derived from the various sources.

Complete reports on total resources during the unemployment
period were secured from 136 families in the two cities. The informa­
tion obtained shows that only 4 per cent of these families derived their
entire maintenance during the unemployment period from the father’s
earnings at temporary jobs. The greater number of fathers were
able to provide only between 15 per cent and 39 per cent of the total
family income by means of temporary jobs. More than half the
mothers gainfully employed contributed less than 15 per cent of the
family maintenance, and in nearly two-fifths of the families the
wage-earning children under 18 years contributed similar propor­
tions. Aid from relatives was small in amount. Income from
lodgers, boarders, and rent constituted in nearly three-fifths of the
cases less than 15 per cent of the total resources.
Of the families receiving charitable aid, over two-thirds reported
less than 15 per cent of their total living from this source; for the
remainder, with one exception, charitable aid constituted from 15 to
39 per cent of the total maintenance during the unemployment
period.
Approximately three-fifths of the families reporting that they had
incurred debts for food and other articles had derived less than 15 per
cent of their total maintenance, during the unemployment period,
from this source. For a third of the families, 15 to 39 per cent of the
maintenance was secured through credit and for 9 per cent of the
families from 40 to 69 per cent. Money loans had supplied less than
15 per cent of the maintenance for more than a third of the families
and from 15 to 39 per cent for almost half the families. In almost a
fifth of the families loans accounted for 40 per cent or more of the
resources during unemployment.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE

F A M IL IE S

OF T H E

31

UNEM PLOYED.

Savings, on the,other hand, supplied larger proportions of the total
resources. For almost two-fifths of the families, the use of savings
furnished from 15 per cent to 39 per cent of the total living expendi­
tures; for two-fifths, the savings spent during the unemployment
period represented from 40 per cent to 69 per cent of the total mainte­
nance.
Table I gives these figures in detail, showing the percentages of
total income during unemployment derived from the various sources:
T a b l e I .— Sources o f fa m ily m aintenance d u rin gfa th er's u n em p lo ym en t; based o n reports
o f 1S6 fa m ilie s .1

Families reporting each specified source of maintenance.
Per cent of total family maintenance from each
specified source.

Sources of family maintenance during
father’ s unemployment.
Total.

Father’s earnings from temporary w ork...

Other debts..................................................

135
31
27
19
20
65
48
86
84
5
66

Less
15-39
40-69
70-99
100
than 15
per cent. per cent. per cent. per cent. per cent.
39
18
10
14
9
9
18
51
48
5
46

59
8
9
4
5
2 24
21
28
28

23
3
6
1
5
«26
7
7
8

19

1

10
2
2

4

1
6
2

1 Only 136 families returned complete reports.
2 One includes a strike benefit.
* One includes $2,000 life insurance, $800 allotment from Navy.

W eekly resources at the time o f inquiry.

At the time of the visit by the bureau’s agents, one-third of the
347 families reporting as to earnings during the preceding week had
no income from earnings of father, mother, or children. In a total
of almost three-fourths of the families there were no earnings or they
amounted to less than $20 a week. The percentages of families hav­
ing weekly earnings of various amounts were as follows:

Weekly earnings.

Per cent
distribu­
tion of
families
reporting.

T o t a l ......................................................................................
N o e a r n in g s ............................. .............................................. .................................

100
33

Less than $5................................................... ......................................................... ..

7

$5, less than $10................... ....................................................................................

12

$10, less than $15.......................................................................... . . . . ' .................

10

$15, less than $ 20 .................................................. ............................ .....................

12

$20, less than $25................................ •........................... ........................................

10

$25, less than $30.....................................................................................................

7

$30, less than $35....................... ............ .......... .....................................................
$35, less than $ 4 0 ............................... . . . . ............................................................
$40 and over............................ .................................................................................

5
2
3


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

32

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

Average monthly resources during unemployment.

From 188 families in the two cities it was possible to secure what
appeared to be a close approximation to their average monthly
resources during the entire unemployment period. The figures below
show the number of families and the number of children represented
in e a c h in c o m e

group.

Average monthly resources of families.

T o ta l......................................
Less than $25............................
$25, less than $50...........................
$50, less than $75...... , ......... ........ ............. ........................
$75, less than $100......................................................
$100, less than $150........................................................... . . .
$150, less than $200.......................................................

Number of
families.

Num­
ber of
children.

188

673

6
43
63
45
26
5

19
147
213
163
114
17

Of the 673 children, only 131, or 19 per cent, were in families
whose average monthly resources were $100 or more. A fourth of
all the children were in families having an average of less than $50
monthly. It should be remembered that these families averaged
more than five members each and that the amounts reported as
resources included everything that the family had had to live on—
credit, loans, charitable aid, and savings used, as well as wages.
Income during year preceding unemployment.

Complete information as to income during the year preceding
unemployment could be ascertained for somewhat less than threeeighths of the families. Nevertheless, the following data covering
131 of the families are believed to be fairly representative of the
w h o le g r o u p :

Income during year preceding unemployment.
T otal..............................

Number of
families report­
ing income
previous to
unemployment.
131

$800, less than $ 1, 000. . ...........................................................................................

1

$1,000, less than $1,200................ ................................. ................. ........................

7

$1,200, less than $1,400............................................................................................

15

$1,400, less than $1,600...........................................................................................

17

$1,600, less than $ 1 ,8 0 0 ..................... ................. ..................................................

23

$1,800, less than $2,000...........................................................................................

14

$ 2, 000, less than $ 2,200....................... 1...............................i .......... ................. - .

18

$2,200, less than $2,400.........

13

$2,400, less than $2,600.............................................................................. , ..........
$2,600, less than $2,800.................................. .......... ..................................... -—

6
13

$2,800, less than $3,000................................................. '.........................................

2

$3,000, less than $3,200............................................................................................

2

According to these figures, two-fifths of the families had total
incomes during the year preceding unemployment of $2,000 or more.
A more complete index of the previous economic status of the
families may be found in the following figures relating to the father’s

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL J E S OF T H E

33

UNEM PLOYED.

monthly wages in his last regular job, which were reported for 336
fathers.
•
Number
of fathers
reporting
monthly
wages.
336

Monthly wages in last regular job.
T otal......................................

Per
cent
distributton.
100

$100...........................................

48

14

$100, less than $125.........................

96

29

$125, less than $ 1 5 0 .............................................................. - .............

83

25

$150, less than $175.................. . .. - ....................................................

52

15

$175, less than $200.......................

27

8

$200, less than $ 2 2 5 .i. —

17

5

..............- ..................................................

$225, less than $25 0 .............................. ............................................- ................................................................$250 and over.......... .

H
2

3
1

CHART m .

AVERAG E

M ON TH LY

RESOU RCES

DURING TH E UNEM PLOYM ENT PERIOD COMPARED
W ITH INCOMES N TH E PRECEDING Y E A R

Unemployment Period

*150-*199 f j 3%
*200-*249 | 2 *
*250 and | ~o/

over

|^/®

Year Preceding Unemployment
L ess th e n
*50

|

N one

* 5 0 -8 99

H

* I O O -* I 4 9

1

* I 5 0 - 8I9 9

W lll"‘ ....

* 2 0 0 -* 2 4 9
*250 a n d
over


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

N

1

34

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E ,
D e t a il e d T a b l e A .— S ou rces o f m aintenance during fath er’ s u n em p loym en t

Per cent of income derived from each source.
Average
Duration monthly
<
of
Sched­
Income
unem- resources
Chil­
during
ule
from
pay­
unem­ Father’s Mother’s dren’s boarders Savings Loans. Debts.
No.
ment
used.
earnings. earnings. earn­
ploy­
and
(months). ment.
ings.
lodgers.
22.1
$57.24
44.0
16
23.4
8.4
12.6
25.1
25.5
75.59
16
8
28.3
25.73
71.7
6.3
35.61
37.0
36.9
15
38.9
41.60
20
71.44
3.6
20.0
7.2
14
54.22
42.9
57.1
10
47-2
27.4
97.63
7.9
13.5
15
4.0
44.0
63.00
.5
13
8.4
8
83.84
44.0
28.0
84.24
22.7
10.5
27.8
17
50.46
34.0
33.7
17
60.34
10.9
6-6
13
8
11.5
60.63
10.3
8
11.0
30.91
84.7
268.09
4.8
* 62.4
1.6
31.2
19
36.9
46.38
44.8
16
44.11
28.6
11.1
14
58
81.09
3.3
48.8
24.4
15
8.1
60.54
55.7
5.1
59
16
•5
*
4.9
60
42.3
54.19
10
22.1
62
52.00
25.0
37.8
15
23.8
63
49.35
5.7
21
9.5
46.0
64
69.56
24.0
19.0
2.6
13
68
29.92
18.6
43.0
14.5
13
14.9
9
5.1
69
49.70
32.3
15.0
74
8
120.36
1.0
7.6
30.8
32. Ô
2.4
96.57
2.1
7.1
75
12
24.7
63.7
2.1
76
236.03
35.4
12
78
79.33
7.7
12.9
14.5
15
44.96
41.0
79
16
83
18
223.43
31.5
68.5
84
17.7
14
103.28
. 21.0
35-5
44.44
8
16.3
85
16.3
86
66.85
23.0
18
40.9
6
67.80
14.5
5.2
88
43.88
56.3
7.0
89
16
8
72.84
25.1
34.0
90
21.2
8
106.03
9.7
48.4
91
92
60.42
51.7
48.3
10
8.4
94
8
62.85
23.8
17.4
10.3
72.4
88.01
96
25.5
16
7.0
102
94.63
70.0
15
44.4
90.98
35.9
15.3
103
.9
.5
13
11
26.8
50.0
109
63.39
4.7
42.11
15.4
50.8
33.8
110
14
3.2
111
42.99
12
12.1
112
40.06
7.1
34.0
15
13.3
85.16
15.3
9.8
12.0
47.1
118
15
69.25
25.0
125
17
8.7
20.4
7.4
37.75
68.3
126
23
8
99.36
8.3
85.6
127
31.2
115.45
136
51.7
13
97.97
38.1
30.4
137
1.1
13
152.50
26.9
139
6
36.3
140
126.05
9.3
26.5
17.4
13
35.11
33.5
6.0
10
20.36
146
14
31.5
96.2
3
151
593.71
3.8
152
51.38
22.5
13
30.29
42.1
52.6
153
14
11
411.80
85.2
14.8
155
55.74
41.2
58.8
157
18
162
4
32.9
36.57
5
24.87
100.0
163
48.26
165
10
16.8
32.1
168
15
148.56
6.2
61.7
12
101.33
9.9
21.3
10.7
47.0
175
34.4
9
44.51
177
83.48
59.3
179
13
37.48
35.5
180
13
1Includes only the 136 families for whom complete information was obtained.
* Includes $2,000 life insurance and $800 allotment from the Navy.
3
8
11
17
21
26
27
29
39
40
42
43
49
50
51
52
55


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Chari­
table
aid.

25.0
5-0

8.9

8.5
35.8
50.2

11.3
25.3
19.0

3.0
27.5
35.6
4.0
31.3
63.5
63.2
4.3

1.0
24.0
12.0
7.0
1.0
19.0
15.0

18.3
60.3
11.2
25.5
32.7
2.1
4.2
50.4
9.0
45.8
28.6

12.3
5.1
20.1
13.0
10.8
4.0

31.5
50.9
25.5

31.0
14.0
33.5

6.8
19.2
17.8
74.3
34.7
40.9
1.0

19.0
64.5
2.0
6.0
2.0

27.1
0.9
8.0
3.0
18.5

13.0
1.2
15.0

96.8
33.5
14.8
42.9
16.3
6.1
16.1
30.4
36.8
46.8
45.5
68.5

1.8

19.7

1.0
3.0
8.0
1.0

15.0

77.5
5.3
67.1
66.2

17.0

11.1
65.6
27.7
44.5

13.0
20.0

T H E F A M I L I E S OF T H E

35

UNEM PLOYED.

D e t a il e d T a b l e A .— S ou rces o f m aintenance during fath er's u n em p loym en t— Contd.

Per cent of income derived from each source.
Average
Duration monthly
of
resources
Sched­ unem­
Income
Chil­
during
ule
from
ploy­
unem­ Father’s Mother’s dren’s boarders Savings Loans. Debts.
No.
ment
used.
earn­
earnings.
ploy­
and
(months). ment.
ings. lodgers.
184
185
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
205
208
209
210
212
217
219
220
222
223
229
231
236
237
240
246
247
249
252
253
256
257
258
259
273
278
282
299
306
307
309
312
-329
• 331
334
335
336
342
344
346
347
348
356
357
358
359
361
365

12
11
15
13
12
13
15
9
12
15
8
16
10
15
15
13
17
10
17
13
8
16
12
16
19
13
13
15
16
9
6
10
19
17
13
7
10
9
2
17
4
8
14
12
n. r.
10
8
n. r.
9
14
13
14
10
10
14
8
17
14
15
12
13
24
15
7
15

$56.84
85.28
52.14
82.67
62.25
123.29
73.09
56.33
53.84
83.40
85.52
62.51
33.10
56.98
136.62
40.28
70.94
79.63
60.81
157.34
25.73
56.77
44.59
54.11
65.46
60.88
56.07
119.71
109.29
67.28
168.47
103.28
53.70
150.87
86.09
41.10
58.14
20.58
36.95
118.01
84.99
46.14
85.93
91.30
n. r.
37.63
58.24
n. r.
100.26
77.50
46.53
78.28
50.86
101.69
53.28
89.20
106.20
111.94
87.33
52.21
34.88
65.76
32.15
62.70
205.03

3 Includes $400 strike benefit.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

59.0
17.8
88.4
20.6
28.6
30.4
40.1
4.9
21.4
50.7
8.7
12.3
8.1
68.8
41.4
31.8
12.2
24.4
29.5
14.6
17.0
8.5
70.4
30.4
5.0
83.4
24.3
47.1
70.6
13.6
28.3
51.6
21.7
19.1
56.3
22.5
3.7
100.0
100.0
87.5
79.1
39.3
27.3
7.4
41.3
7.7
66.3
33.0
64.2
41.1
95.9
47.3
50.0
20.0
100.0
84.7
38.5
9.9
20.1
81.6
16.4
70.2
16.7
22.7
11.0

0.9

2.2
2.7

14.3
43.4

25.7

32.3

23.0

53.0

'Ì7.'2

20.2
8.3
61.5

11.7

44.6
24.6

14.0
47.3

9.1
12.0

"2.'4

10.4

10.8

53.1

6.0

»28.0
49.7
25.2
14.0

2.1
15.3
1.4
27.1
20.6
74.6
17.1
60.8
11.2
29.9
41.1
8.0
3.0
9.2
37.8
33.5
19.0

3.7

3.7

12.7

18.7
22.5

1ÏÀ
23.8
27.0

64.6
"Ì3.Ò
42.'2

16.9
15.7
66.6
54.8
58.7
68.5

7.2

10.3
24.8

10.0
1.3

44.9
48.8

1.6

"Ì5.Ò"
37.7"
27.9'
40.0
80.0
Ì4.*Ó'
16.5

11.9
13.0
4.0
21.0

12.6

30.7
31.1

' § 2.'4

6.0
2.2

23.3
21.9
55.6
22.5
14.4
20.0
65.3
19.6
26.0
12.0
16.6
40.0
22.9
11.3
3.1

9.0

3.0
12.0

12.0
17.0
1.3
1.7
10.0
5.0
7.2
32.0
' "Ó.7

0.2

"ó .'é

" 9.Ó

50.6
' '9.'9'

2.7

1.6
” 7.' 4*
33.7
1.5
7.6

"¿'0'

13.4

'75.'3'
16.1
’ 25.’ i
62.5

5.6
*5."i

' 9.7'
53.7
16.2

38.8

25.0

32.6

81.5

23.6

48.4

45.0

50.5

8.0

9.5

12.5
17.4

21.1
11.0
5.6
3.4
50.1

Chari­
table
aid.

" 2 .5

6.0
3.7

10.7
21.2

27.9
2.3

4.7
20. i
75.3
3.0

2.1

36

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .
LOW ERED

S T A N D A R D S O F L IV IN G .7

M onthly resources before and during unemployment.

It was not practicable to undertake an intensive study of the
standards of living prior to and during unemployment. The only
available criteria of the effects of the unemployment are, therefore,
to be found in a comparison of the resources of the families before
and after the father was thrown out of work, and in data based on
estimated budgets of the minimum requirements for the needs of
the families. For 61 families— including 203 children— the average
monthly resources during the period of unemployment were com­
pared with the family income while the fathers were regularly em­
ployed. Half of these children (101) belonged in families whose
average monthly resources during the unemployment periods were
less than 50 per cent of the average monthly incomes while the
fathers were working at their regular occupations. Six of the 101
children were in families in which the income had been reduced to
less than 15 per cent of what it had ’been under normal conditions,
and in the families of 13 children the total resources during unem­
ployment were only from 15 to 25 per cent of what the income had
been when the father was working. The families of almost twofifths of the children were forced during the unemployment period
to live on from 50 to 75 per cent of the amount of the income when
the father had been employed.
For the younger children, especially, the deprivations implied in
these findings can not help but have serious and lasting results, and
the fact that 60 per cent of the children under 7 years of age were
in families in which the average monthly income had been cut to
less than half of that previously available is evidence of the rela­
tion of unemployment to child welfare.
Comparison o f resources during unemployment with estimated family
budgets.

Analysis of average monthly resources during unemployment as
compared with estimated family budgets is even more conclusive.
As a basis for budget estimates applying to the individual families
included in the study, there were available some especially valuable
data that had been collected by one of the large manufacturing
plants of Racine. For a year and a half prior to the study of the
results of unemployment, this company had obtained from families
and from retail stores data which were compiled to furnish informa­
tion on the monthly variation in the cost of the main items of family
needs, on the basis of which had been figured a standard budget for
a family of five. Such a budget had been compiled by the company
7 See Appendix A. Tables 20,25,26, and 27.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE

F A M IL IE S OF T H E

37

UNEM PLOYED.

as of December 27, 1921. Since this date was included in the time
period of the inquiry made by the Children’s Bureau in Racine, this
budget is of especial value here in connection with the study and is
given below.
M onthly B udget for F amily of F iv e , Consisting of M an , W oman , G irl 10 to 14,
B oy 6 to 10, and Child U nder 3 Y e ar s .8
DECEMBER 27.

1921.

F ood .

R en t, fu e l, and light.

M an.............................................. . . ...........$ 2.9 7

R e n t . . ..................................................... $ 30 .0 0

W om an................ . ................ ....................

2 .5 5

C o a l............................................

7 .5 0

Girl 10 to 14 years........ ........................

1 .9 8

W o o d ........................................................

1 .7 5

6 to 10 years...................................

1 .8 0

Fuel g a s ..................................................

2 .5 0

Child under 3 years..............................

1 .6 9

L ig h t........................................................

1 .7 5

Per w eek_____ _______ ________

1 0.9 9

Boy

4 3 .5 0

Per month (4J w eeks).........................4 7 .6 2
M iscellaneous.
C lothing.

M an.............................................................

6.3 3

W om an........ ..............

4 .4 3

Girl 10 to 14 years.................................

3 .4 6

6 to 10 years.............. ...................

2 .7 7

Child under 3 years.............................

1 .0 5

Boy

Soap, towels, e t c ............................ ....

5 .0 0

Car fa re .................................................

1 .8 0

Insurance...............................................

2 .0 0

Doctor and m e d icin e .........................

5 .0 0
1 3 .8 0

1 8.0 4
TOTAL ESTIMATE.

Amount.
$122.96

Per cent.

Food....................

4 7 .6 2

3 8 .7

Clothing............

1 8 .0 4

1 4 .7

R e n t...................

3 0 .0 0

2 4 .4

F uel and light
Miscellaneous.

1 3.5 0

1 1 .0

1 3.8 0

1 1 .2

Total.............................................. ........................

100.0

Using this budget as a basis, and estimating the amount required
for each family in accordance with the number, ages, and sex of its
members, a comparison is here made between the average monthly
resources during unemployment and the estimated budgets for 126
Racine families and 60 families in Springfield from which sufficiently
detailed information was secured to make the comparison possible.
There is possibility of differences in the cost of items in the two cities,
but the variations were probably not sufficient to invalidate the data
as given in groups of amounts. Table II compares the monthly
receipts with the budget estimates for each of the total 186 families.
8 Compiled b y the Case Threshing Machine Co., Bacine, Wis. As no amounts were specified for food and
clothing for boys and girls of certain ages, the same amount was allowed for a boy 14 years of age and over
as for a man, and the same amount for a girl 14 and over as for a woman. The allowance for food and for
clothing for both boys and girls from 10 to 14 years of age and from 6 to 10 years was the same. For a child
from 3 to 5, $1.75 per week was allowed for food and $1.91 per month for clothing.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

38

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

T a b l e I I .— C om parison o f average m on th ly resources and estim ated budget requirem ent;
fa m ilies f o r w hom average m on th ly resources were reported.

Families
Average monthly resources
during unemployment period.

with

Total
families.
$75-$99

Total families....................

186

5

Less than $25..............................
$25, less than $50.........................
$50, less than $75.........................
$75, less than $100.......................
$100, less than $125.....................
$125, less than $150......................
$150, less than $175......................

6
43
63
47
19
4
4

1
1
2

------- r

specified estimated
requirements.

monthly

budget

$100-$124 $125-$149 $150-$174 $175-$199 $200-$224
.

87

61

29

3
21
38
20
“ T
1
3

1
14
14
21
8
2
1

1
7
9
5
6
1

3

1

3

1
1

Under the scheme worked out by the industrial plant the monthly
budgets for 5 families would be estimated at between $75 and $99;
only 1 of them had resources during the unemployment period which
fell within the same group. Of the 87 families whose budgets should
have been between $100 and $124, 62 had average monthly resources
of less than $75, 3 of them having an average of less than $25 a month.
In the next group, 50 of the 61 families for whom the budgets were
figured at $125 to $149 a month had actual resources of less than $100,
15 of them averaging less than $50 a month.
While there were 94 families for whom the estimated budgets
exceeded $125 a month, only 8 of the scheduled families had resources
of $125 or over. Conversely, 49 per cent of the budget estimates
were for monthly averages of less than $125, while the actual resources
of 96 per cent of the families were under this amount.
The data given in Table II show 9 families of the 186 as having
average monthly resources falling in the same group as the budget
estimate, or in a higher group. In almost every instance this was
accounted for by doctor bills or other emergency expenses not allowed
for in the budget estimates, or by savings that had permitted the
family to maintain something like their usual standard of living. In
some families the amounts of the budgets were considerably below
the income they had had when the father was working, so that even
though they appeared to have had a fairly adequate amount to live
on during the father’s unemployment, the standard of living for the
family had been greatly reduced.
One of the 9 families had used up savings amounting to $700, and
another almost $2,000, for the family maintenance. Loans or debts
for food, fuel, and other necessities, amounting in some cases to several
hundred dollars, accounted for a considerable proportion of the
family resources. In one family whose resources and estimated
budget both fell within the $100 to $124 group, the man had earned
$220 a month when he was regularly employed; obviously there had

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E

39

UNEM PLOYED.

been a considerable decrease in the family’s living costs, the greater
share of the maintenance during the father’s unemployment having
been derived through borrowed money, and groceries and fuel bought
on credit; a child was the only member of the family who was working,
and the rent was in arrears. In another family the income through
the father’s earnings of $145 a month prior to unemployment was
practically the same as the average expenditures while he was out of
work, but the family had lived mainly on borrowed money, being in
debt to the extent of $1,400; the mother worked regularly, earning
$15 a week, and the father had had some temporary jobs. This
family’s actual monthly expenditures during the unemployment
averaged $148, while the budget estimate amounted to only $112.
They were, as noted, living up to their former income mainly through
loans and the contribution of the mother who had gone to work.
Income data in sufficient detail to furnish the basis for reliable per­
centage comparisons with the estimated budgets were secured for 90
families. The findings were as follows:
Ratio of monthly income to
estimated budget.
T o t a l . . . . , .................

Number of
families.
90

Less than 15 per cen t....................- ................. ............................ - ........................
15-24 per cen t..................................................................................

1

6

25-49 per c e n t.....................................................................- ...................................-

38

50-74 per cen t........................................................ - ............... - .......................... i - -

34

75-99 per cen t.....................................................

11

Thus, for almost half these families the average monthly resources
during the unemployment period amounted to less than 50 per cent
of the budget estimates based on the costs of food, clothing, rent,
fuel, and other necessities.
Illustrations o f the effect o f unemployment on standards o f living.

The conditions that resulted from the loss of employment by the
chief breadwinner may best be shown through brief summaries of
conditions in a few of the many families in which the investigators
found distinct indication of the lowering of the standards of family
life. These accounts, secured from the families themselves, give a
picture of the results of unemployment, including many factors which
do not lend themselves readily to statistical interpretation.. The
stories are related as of the day on which the visit of the bureau’s
agent took place.
One family consists of American-born parents— about 30 years of
age— and three children, 4, 9, and 11 years old. The father, a welder
for an implement works, lost his job a year ago. Since then he has
worked three weeks for the city and has had irregular employment
at his former place, earning a total of $505 during the year. Am
4 9 0 9 0 °— 2 3 -^ — 4


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

40

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

aunt came to live with, the family during the summer. For four
weeks she paid $2.50 a week and the fifth week $4. Then she lost
her job and has paid nothing since.
The family has not yet been obliged to ask for charitable aid, but
the struggle to keep from it has been hard. When the father was
laid off they were living in a nine-room house, for which they paid
$35 a month. Realizing they could not keep up this rent they moved
into a six-room flat at $20. After four months they felt they must
retrench even more, so they moved across the street into their present
flat of four rooms, at $15 a month. It is heated by a stove and has
few of the conveniences they had in the other houses. There are no
sidewalks, and the street is unpaved.
The father had to drop his own $2,000 insurance policy and also
smaller policies for his wife and children. The mother has cut the
food down to the minimum. She tries to give the children milk
once a day now instead of every meal, as she did when the father was
working. They have run up a $200 grocery bill, owe $29 for clothing,
$6.50 for gas and electricity, and have borrowed about $400 from
friends. In addition, they owe $9.50 for coal to the factory where
the father was formerly employed and $160 for groceries obtained
through the commissary.
A Hungarian couple who have been in the United States 18 years,
and residents of the city 9 years, are about 35 years old and have
four boys, whose ages are 1, 4, 9, and 13 years, and a girl of 11. The
father is a molder and in ordinary times can earn about $1,800 a year.
With so large a family it was not possible to save much, but they
were buying their home by monthly payments of $20.
The father was laid off in October, 1920, and the period of unem­
ployment had stretched to 15 months. During this time he had
picked up a few short-time laboring jobs, the pay for which totaled
less than $150. The mother economized as much as possible on
food, reducing the milk from 4 or 5 quarts to 3 a day, cutting out
fruit and sweets, and buying meat once a week instead of once or
twice daily. They ran up a $66 grocery bill and a debt of $6 at a
tea and coffee store, and then credit was refused them. They bor­
rowed $60 from friends and ran behind on insurance payments and
payments on the house. Finally the mother, although not a strong
woman, and with much to do in caring for her own home, succeeded
in finding cleaning to do, two days a week for seven weeks. Part
of the time she took the children to a day nursery and the other days
the 11-year-old girl cared for them at home. The mother has earned
a total of $42 during the father’s unemployment. The family is now
living entirely on city-commissary orders, and has a bill there of
$36.35.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M I L I E S OF T H E

UNEM PLOYED.

.

41

The 13-year-old boy had kept the family supplied with fuel by
picking coal off the railroad tracks. He finally was caught and
arrested and he and his father were brought into the juvenile court.
At the first hearing the father was ordered to pay $14 for the “ stolen”
coal and was given two weeks in which to get the money. Only two
days of the two weeks are left, and the father expects to go to jail
because he has nothing with which to pay.
A man who had been earning $18 a week working for a baking
company lost his job just before Christmas, and in order to reduce
expenses his family went to live in an apartment with the family of
his brother. Including the child of the brother and his own little
boys, aged 1 and 3 years, there are seven people living in four rooms.
During the two months of his unemployment the father has had but
one job— cutting ice— at which he has earned only $9. Because of a
weak heart he can not continue at this work or stand city work.
The payments on insurance policies, which had been carried for the
father, mother, and one child, have been dropped. No milk is being
taken, even though the children are so small. The relief society has
given aid to the extent of $15.46. The mother says that the family
is not in debt.
Slack work caused the unemployment of a metal-pattern worker
who had been making about $48 a week. In the 13 months since he
lost his job he has earned only $202. To get the wherewithal to live,
he and his wife have sold their jewelry and a considerable amount of
their furniture, including two stoves. They have also cashed in at a
considerable loss the insurance they were carrying. None of the
three children is strong. The eldest— a girl of 14 years—has been
declared by the school physician undernourished, but the mother
says that it is impossible to afford the daily quart of milk prescribed
for her. The family already owes $537.50, although part of the $225
grocery bill will probably be offset by the father’s services in repairing
and keeping in order the grocer’s automobile. In their prosperous
days the family had evidently lived quite up to their income, since
they are still in possession of an automobile, said to be too old to
bring anything at a sale, which they can not now afford to run.
A family in which there are four children has managed to get along
“ somehow” — as the mother put it— although in over a year the
father had apparently earned only $75. Y et they have kept out of
debt. Shoes and stockings are one of the things they have not been
able to manage, however, and lack of them had kept two of the
children out of school and brought a visit from the truant officer.
In this cold month of February, the 2-year-old baby is running
around barefoot.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

42

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Over 14 years ago a Syrian father and mother emigrated to America,
leaving in their native land three little sons. Nine months before
the visit of the agent, these boys arrived in this country. They are
now 16, 17, and 18 years of age, and are crowding the disordered
home, which shelters also a Syrian-born daughter, four Americanborn children, and the 18-year-old brother of the father. Soon after
the arrival of the three boys, the father was laid off, and there was
no market for the young strength and ability of these additions to the
family. The father has earned only $283 in seven months, a friend
has loaned him $400, and the overseer of the poor has supplied some
clothing. The mother and the oldest son have had spells of sickness,
and all the children have had the mumps. The family is in the habit
of huddling in the kitchen, which is the one heated room. The 15-yearold daughter has just got her working certificate and is employed in
a laundry. Her wages— $6 a week— are the only ascertainable
present income of the family. The one pleasant thing apparent in the
situation is the fact that two of the young immigrants, unable to
secure work, are getting their first training for future citizenship in
the schoolroom instead of the factory.
A sturdy Russian-German couple in their forties, with five chil­
dren—girls of 16 and 6 years, and boys 14, 13, and 10— live in a
10-room frame dwelling in a good residence neighborhood. The
rooms are newly papered and comfortably furnished— victrola, china
closet, library table, books, and pictures. The father is illiterate
and a common laborer, but a steady worker. The mother is evidently
a good manager. They are buying their house on “ contract,” for
which the monthly payment is $25. The mother says they have
struggled for years to get ahead, but as soon as they had a little
money saved it had to be used for emergencies. One child died a
few years ago, and they had large doctor and funeral bills; then the
mother had an operation on her leg, which has not healed properly,
and she still has to spend money for doctor and medicine. However,
with all their economizing they never lived as they have to now.
They have meat only twice a week, instead of once or twice a day, do
without fruit and desserts entirely, and get only one quart of fresh
milk daily. They live on what they can get through the city com­
missary.
During the 14 months since the father lost his employment he has
had some short-time jobs. He could not remember just how long
these lasted, nor how much he has earned, but reported it was well
under $200. The mother tried taking in roomers, but they have lost
their jobs, too, so can pay no rent. Debts have piled up until the
mother has become almost frantic. The meat bill was $140, and
the butcher threatened to cut off further credit unless something


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

43

could be done about it. He finally told the mother that if she would
do the washing for his family he would credit her $5 a week on the
bill and allow her to continue getting meat there. The Washings are
huge— 6 to 10 large butcher aprons in addition to a good-sized family
wash. It takes her at least three half-days a week to do the work,
and she is scarcely strong enough to do even her own washing. She
has cut the bill to $109. Besides this, they owe $250 in payments on
the house, $69 interest, $64 for last year’s taxes, $10 for fuel, $100
cash which was borrowed, a balance of $55 on a victrola bought in
1920, and $74 to the city commissary.
The oldest two boys have had for two years a paper route for Sun­
day papers only, and they earn about 50 cents a week—which is the
only income the mother can count on. During the summer the boys
caught fish. The family used what fish they could, and then the
mother took the rest to the neighbors and exchanged-it for coffee or
other groceries which they could spare.
They have given up six insurance policies, the weekly premiums
for which came to 90 cents. The hardest thing the family has had
to do was to ask for charity. Both the private relief society and the
city poor office have helped with clothing and groceries.
The parents are utterly discouraged over the future. Credit has
been cut off, taxes are due again, and the mother has just 23 cents in
the house— what is left of the boys’ paper money. “ Sometimes I sit
and cry—it is so heavy.”
A carpenter, the father of a family of four children whose ages range
from 7 to 16 years, has not had steady work for 13 months. When
he lost his job, his oldest boy had completed the eighth grade and was
about to begin learning his father’s trade b y working with the father.
After half a year out of school the boy became a clerk in a store, and
is now earning $8 a week. His wages, together with his father’s
earnings at temporary work, bring the family income for the 13
months up to $913.67, as against the $3,100 which the father alone
was able to earn during the same period at steady work. In arrears
for five months’ rent, the family moved to a house at a higher rental,
this being cheaper than to pay the back rent. The home is in great
disorder, and the house old and dilapidated.
A family with three children— 8, 10, and 12 years of age— had
always lived comfortably, and had begun to get ahead financially
when the father lost his job. He had been in this country 18 years
and has taken out his first citizenship papers. He made $30 a week
as a machinist until May, 1921. Since October he has had about
half-time work, earning $18 a week. The mother has been doing
laundry work two or three days a week and averages $6 a week, but
feels that she is not strong enough to do this.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

44

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

The family live in a four-room frame bungalow, which they are
buying. The house has neither gas nor electricity and no furnace,
so that during the winter the upper rooms can not be used, as there
is no way of heating them. They have no money for the overdue
taxes nor for the interest on the mortgage, and the mother is afraid
they will have to lose the house. She has been considering borrowing
money on a high-interest plan, without consulting the father, in
order to pay the taxes.
The father refused an offer of help at Christmas time from the
church to which they belong— they are too proud to let it be known
that they are in need. He did, however, accept a loan .of $5 from a
visitor from the church and a ton of coal was accepted— the mother
explained because it was left at the door and they were entirely
without fuel. The amount of milk has bdfen reduced from 2 quarts a
day to 1. Although they have been able to keep in food supplies,
they do not have what they were used to, and the food the mother
buys is of a very cheap grade. The two older children are under­
nourished. - The youngest child has trouble with his eyes, and his
teacher says he needs glasses. The mother is worn out from over­
work and worry. When the mother and father are both at work,
the children have to shift for themselves, and frequently they have
no lunch. There is a* little garden in which they raise their potatoes
for the winter. They also have a few hens. The father killed a
number of rabbits during the fall, which helped their meat supply.
All their clothes have been made over as there has been no money
for new ones. The mother says that she and her husband worry
all the time, but on account of the children they always pretend to
others that they are getting along very well.
In an American-born family, of higher type than many of the
families visited, the mother is an intelligent woman of 38 years, who
is seemingly trying, against great odds, to keep up her standard of
living. The father is a sheet-metal worker with an earning capacity
of about $114 a month in normal times. They have 4 boys, 1, 3, 5
and 6 years of age. They have put every cent they could save into
their house and have paid over $1,000 of $4,600— the price of the
house and in addition have painted it at a cost of $179, put on a
new roof for $175, and had it wired for electricity, the bill for which
was $104. It is a two-story frame building with a large, grassy,
well-fenced back yard. The rooms are nicely furnished, and there
is a victrola.
In almost 14 months the father has had only a little irregular work.
For six weeks they had a boarder who paid $10 a week, and the mother
earned $15 making a layette for her sister. The family owes $285
for 1920 and 1921 taxes and interest on the mortgage, $147 for gro
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

45

ceries, and $12 for fuel. For the first time the family has had to
accept charity. The relief association has given about $35 in groce­
ries and milk books. The mother would like to keep roomers, but
hasn’ t bedding enough to keep them warm.
The mother has cut expenses to the minimum, getting 1 quart of
milk a day instead of 2— the children drink tea and coffee. The
family suffer most for clothing. The things they had when the
father lost his job were good, but they have had hard wear and the
mother has not been able to replace anything. A friend gave her
two overcoats, which she ripped, washed, turned, and made over for
the children. The children’s shoes are in very bad condition; the
soles are worn through and there are such holes in the toes that new
soles can not be put on. The 5-year-old boy is absent from school
because he has no shoes, and the mother estimated that the oldest
child’s shoes will last just about one week longer. The mother had
on her only housedress and she has no aprons. The father is working
this week. He will make about $26, but $6 will probably be deducted
before he gets it for union dues. He will also have to pay out $12
for coke that has already been delivered. That will leave only $8.
“ What can you do with that?” asked the mother.
EM PLO YM EN T OF TH E M O TH E R .9

Relation to unemployment o f father.

In the families of the unemployed men, 29 per cent of the mothers
in Racine and 37 per cent in Springfield were gainfully employed—
almost one-third of the total number of mothers in the families
visited. Of the 116 working mothers in the two cities, 26, or 22 per
cent, had been engaged in some gainful employment before the
father’s loss of work and 90, or 78 per cent, had apparently begun
work as a result of his unemployment. The proportion in the latter
group was greater in Springfield than in Racine. In both cities only
7 of the mothers had worked prior to but not during the unemploy­
ment period. The employment offices reported that it was very
difficult for women to secure work, either in factories or in household
service. Women of moderate means, who had formerly employed
help for washing, cleaning, and other domestic service, were doing
their own work, and the industrial establishments offered as few
opportunities for women as for men. If employment had been more
readily obtainable, undoubtedly a much greater proportion of these
mothers would have secured it. Under the circumstances, it is
surprising that almost a third of the mothers had been able to find
some work to aid in supporting their families while the fathers were
out of regular employment.
3 See Table I (p. 31) and Appendix A, Tables 32-34, inclusive.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

46

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

W ork at home and away from home.

Three-fourths of all the working mothers were employed away
from home. The proportions working at home and away from home
were practically the same for each of the two cities. The following
list shows the occupations of the mothers, according to whether they
worked at home or away from home:
Number of mothers
Type of work.
gainfully employed.
T otal.................. ................... .......................................................................... .. 1X6
A t hom e................................................... .................. .............. ...................................
Sewing............................... .............................. ..........................’ ...............
Laundry work........................................
K eeping store................................................................ '...........................
Baking bread...................................

]

W eaving rag rugs.................................................................. 1.................

]

A w ay from hom e......................................................... ..............................................
Cleaning...............

25

12
9
2

91

25

Laundry work and cleaning.................................................... ..........

16

Factory and laundry work.................................................................
Laundry work.............................

14
14
5
4
4
2
1
2

Nursing...................................
H otel and restaurant work..................................................
Sewing....................................................................
Working in beet field........................................................................
Clerking in store..........................................
O ther....................
D ay work, type not reported.........................

3

T y p e of work not reported.............................. ..................................

1

Seventy of the 90 mothers who began to work during the father’s
unemployment were working away from home; the proportion for
those who began work before the father’s unemployment was some­
what larger— 21 out of 26.
Hours employed per week.

The average hours of work per week for the women employed away
from home are given below:
Hours of work
per week.
Total.
Less than

12

1 2 -2 3 ..............
24r-35..............
¿ 6 -4 7 ............

4 8 -5 9 .......... .
60 and over.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Number of mothers
reporting hours.

................
........

66
8

...........
............

20
12

................
...........
........... .

12
12

2

th e

f a m il ie s

of

t h e

unem plo yed

47

.

CHART Y.

EM PLOYM ENT OP M O TH E R S
BEFORE AND DURING UNEMPLOYMENT OFFATHERS
366 FAMILIES OF UNEMPLOYED MEN

Mother w orking
before unemployment

Mother working
during unem ployment

The children o f working mothers.

In the families of the 116 working mothers there were 406 children
under 18 years of age. The age distribution was as follows, according
to whether the mother was working at home or away from home.
Children in families Children in families
of mothers working of mothers working
away from home.
at home.

Am

10 298

108

U nder 1 year.

12

9

1-2 years____

32

6

3 -5 y e a r s ....

60

19

S

T otal...........$ r . .............................. .......................... ............

6-13 y e a r s .. .

164

57

1 4-15 y e a r s ..

18

10

16-17 y e a r s ..

12

7

10Includes 20 children whose mothers were working both at home and away.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

48

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Care o f the children during the mother’s absence.

The deprivation of the mother’s care was particularly serious in the
case of the children of preschool age. In the families of the 91
mothers working away from home, there were altogether 298 children.
In 48 of these families there were children under 6 years of age— a
total of 104 children. Of these 16 were going to school, leaving a
total of 88 children under 6 years of age who were at home.
Twenty-five of the 91 unemployed fathers in families where the
mother went out to work remained at home to look after the children
all or some of the time while she was away. Only seven older chil­
dren were reported as caretakers of their younger brothers or sisters
part of the time, and three others looked after the little children
whenever the mother was away working. The children who acted
as caretakers some of the time may have done so mainly when school
was not in session, as they were all of school age. One was 15, two
were 14, one was 13, three were 12, one was 11, one was 10, and one
was 8 years of age. The three children reported as the only care­
takers of younger children were 15, 13, and 12 years of age.
The caretakers while the mothers were away working were reported
as follows:
'

Number of fam, ,
ilies with chilCaretaker.
dren under 6.
T otal..................................................................................................................... 48

Father...........................
12
Father and older child........................................ ......... ...................... . ....... 5
Relative.........................................................................................
Neighbor............................... ........................................ . ................................. 3
Day nursery........................................................................'........................... 4
Older child..............................................................................
Father and day nursery.....................................................
Paid caretaker.........................................................................
Father and other relative................................... ....................................1 .. 2
Father and neighbor.........................................................
Father and roomer..............................................................................
Older child and paid caretaker...................................................................... 1
Older child and day nursery.....................
1
Mother..............................................................................................................
None............................................................................................................
Not reported.............................................................

5

3
2

1

2
1

For the older children as well, the absence of the mother or her
gainful work at home meant deprivation of care, protection, and
supervision. They went to school with insufficient breakfast, re­
turned at noon to a hastily picked-up lunch, and could not help but
suffer ill effects both physically and mentally. The father’s presence
in the home to some extent offset the dangers that are frequently
found to accompany the absence of the mother. In fact, the
attendance officers reported that truancy had decreased during the
unemployment period, presumably due in a measure, at least, to the

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

49

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

father’s opportunity to exercise a stricter discipline over the children.
But this gain did not offset the injury resulting from the neglect of
the housekeeping, the ill-prepared food, and the lack of care of the
children’s clothing, which followed when the mother was absent at
work and was worn out by her excessive duties.
The mother’s earnings.

The average weekly earnings of the mothers are best shown in
Detailed Table B which gives wages for the individual mothers, and
also in relation to the number of hours worked. For the two cities
combined it was possible to secure from only 31 of the families in
which the mother was working complete information on the propor­
tion of the total family resources represented by her earnings. The
figures are as follows:
Per cent of total family resources repNumber of famresented by mothers’ earnings.
ilies reporting.
T otal.......................... ................................................................- - - - - ............... 31
Less than 1 5 ......................
1 5 -3 9 ..................................................................................................
4 0 -6 9 .............. - ........... ..................................... - ..............................................................
7 0 -8 2 ........................................................................................ ..........................................

18
8
3
2

In the cases where the mother contributed a considerable part of
the family maintenance, the hardships endured by the family must
have been especially great. The mother, absent from the home or
busy with paid work for a large proportion of each day, could not
give the necessary care to her children, and the total resources were
low.
Typical instances.

The effect of the employment of the mother is shown more clearly
in the presentation of individual cases than would be possible in any
general analysis.
One father has had no work at all for 10 months. During the
whole of that period the mother has gone out every day to do house­
work, and by this means earned enough to keep the family going.
Since the father often went out to look for work, the two boys of 7
and 11 years had to prepare their own .lunch at noon and were left
without any supervision after school hours. Finally the mother broke
down from the double work of earning the living and caring for her
home and family, a burden which was made all the harder to carry
because of worry over their unfortunate circumstances. When the
father obtained employment from the' city the mother gave up her
outside work but began doing fine laundry work at home. These
parents have a fine, independent spirit and do not wish to apply for
charity. They have accepted two loads of wood from the city, be­
cause the father was working in the parks where the wood was being
cut.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

50

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

A family with two children aged 4 and 12 years had lived very
comfortably while the father was earning between $37 and $40 a
week. They were buying a home, the mother helping by taking
lodgers or boarders. But with the closing of the plant which em­
ployed the father and the lodgers the sources of income were cut off.
During the eight and a half months since the shutdown the father’s
earnings by casual employment have amounted to about $600, and
meeting the payments on the house is a very difficult matter. The
mother now does “ work b y the d a y” for the first time in her life,
and an aunt cares for the children while she is away from home.
The family ‘can afiFord no recreation of any kind, and they are badly
in need of clothes.
In July, 1921, the father of a family in which there are two children,
now 7 and 9 years of age, was laid off, and the mother— a registered
nurse—went to work in a sanitarium. After three weeks she had
to give up this employment, because a full day’s work of 12 hours
was demanded of her, and she could not give so much time without
neglecting her home and children. The father was caring for the
house and the children, but he became ill, and the mother took up
crocheting babies’ bootees at $1.10 per dozen pairs, and could earn
on an average only $5.50 a month. She was not very strong and
had been ill in bed the previous summer, though she kept on crochet­
ing all the time. The total earnings of the father and mother during
the seven months of unemployment had been only $129.50. The
father is now employed, but is earning only $15 at unfamiliar work
as against the $25 which he earned at his regular employment.
In one family visited there are five children, a baby born less than
a month ago, and four children 1, 3, 7, and 14 years of age. The
father, 41 years old, and the mother, 35, are both native bom. The
father earned $28 a week as janitor-guard in a foundry, but since
he lost that employment in October, 1920, he has had only a little
city work and a few odd jobs, amounting to about four weeks’ work
in all, for which he received an average of $10 a week. When the
father lost his job the mother got housework in a private family for
six days a week and also worked half a day on Sunday cleaning a
bakery. She continued to do this, earning $12 a week and her meals,
until a week before the baby was born. She was cared for during
confinement by a visiting nurse. The 14-year-old girl had been
kept out of school to care for the younger children while the mother
was at work and the father was hunting employment. She is now
at home working on a “ home permit” from the school attendance
office. She is in the eighth grade, but she has lost about half the
present term. The father says he is sorry she has been kept out of
school, as he might as well have stayed at home bimspilf—he had
wasted his time looking for work.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

51

The family lives in a dilapidated four-room frame cottage located
behind other buildings, so that the only entrance is through an alley
or between the houses which face on the street. They have lived
here three years, and the rent has been raised from $10 to $12 a month
since the father’s unemployment. The floors are bare and the rooms
are very scantily furnished, but everything is neat and clean. The
kitchen stove furnishes the only heat. In order to save electric
light hills kerosene lamps are used except when one of the family
“ gets excited over reading” and the lamplight is too poor to see by.
A relief society gave the family grocery orders during the time
the mother was unable to work before and after her confinement.
The father now has temporary city work; if he is able to keep this or to
get other steady work the mother will stay at home. The total
amount of charitable aid the family has received during the father’s
unemployment amounts to $75. They were compelled to give up the
life insurance held by the mother, father, and children, the loss
amounting to about $20 in all. The mother has a horror of debts
and will not allow anything to be bought on credit, and they have
contracted no debts except the doctor’s bill for the mother’s recent
confinement. If they have no money they have no food. They
have been getting no milk and only cheap food— and little of that.
The father has had blood poisoning since he lost his job, the
3-year-old girl fell and cut her face and eye while the mother was at
work, and the year-old child has had a crushed hand. The family
has had fewer comforts than ever before and nothing but the abso­
lute essentials. Practically all their clothes have been made over
from articles given the mother by the people for whom she worked.
One mother expressed surprise at the very little that her family
of four could get along on. Except in the very coldest weather the
fire in the cook stove has to suffice to heat all their six rooms. This
means that the family practically lives in the kitchen. The piano
and then the parlor furniture were sold for half of what they cost.
Insurance payments were stopped, and this meant the loss of most
of what had been paid in. In spite of these sacrifices and the $137.50
earned by the mother, who had done her best to help, the family
owes $167. Since the children are 1 and 3 years of age, and the elder
has some form of seizures, the father has to give up his hunt for
employment in order to care for them when the mother goes out
working.
During the year preceding unemployment one father estimated
that his income was $2,600, and when he was laid off he was getting
$60 per week. The family was in very comfortable circumstances
and would have saved a considerable amount had it not been for the
fact that the older of the two children, a girl 2 years of age, had been

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

52

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

under the care of an orthopedic specialist since birth, on account of
a weak spine. The father says that no expense was spared, and
they were always hoping that something could be done for the
child. In this case a comfortable income was cut off very suddenly,
and the father has had only four months’ work during the past
year. The mother is now doing work by the day five days a week.
It is evident that this hurts the father, because she is not accustomed
to hard work and has never gone out before. The family has found
it cheaper to send the crippled child to a hospital, where the charges
are made as low as possible ($7 a week) and where the bill can rim as
long as necessary. Feeding the child and paying the specialist
cost a great deal more than $7 a week. The baby is taken to a day
nursery every morning that the mother goes out to work. The father
feels that the home has been completely broken up since his unem­
ployment. The little savings have long since been eaten up, and
the family is deep in debt. Even if the father gets work soon he will
not be out of debt for years.
Just when a sheet-metal worker— a man of 56 years— was put on
half-time, his landlord announced a substantial increase in his rent.
To meet this difficulty, he bought the house— a three-flat tenement—
investing in the equity $1,000 which constituted all his savings.
Since that time the two rented flats have brought in steadily $64 a
month. Of this, $40 has had to be used for the interest on the
mortgage, leaving only $24 a month for taxes, water rent, repairs,
and the payments to the real estate agent on the remaining $1,500
purchase price of the house. The arrangement means, at any rate,
that the family is not paying rent.
The father’s total earnings in the 17 months since he was first put
on half-time have been only $492, and for 4 months he has been
entirely out of employment. The city work he found too hard.
The three children are going to school; the eldest— a girl of 17— is in
high school. The mother has attempted to help the financial situa­
tion by making bungalow aprons, but finds that the most she can
earn in the time left after she has done her regular housework and
the family sewing is 72 cents a week.
If the father’s unemployment continues much longer, it is difficult
to see how this family, whose home though plain is exceptionally neat,
can fail to lose their equity in the house, which represents the savings
of a lifetime; and the ambitions of the parents for the better educa­
tion of their children can not be fulfilled.
About two years ago a Polish father invested his savings in the
purchase of a store. He did not make a success of the enterprise,
and most of the money was lost. He had a few months of employ­
ment as a sheet-metal worker and then lost his job, and he has been

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

th e

f a m il ie s

of

t h e

u n e m plo y e d

.

53

out of steady work for over a year and a half, getting a little work
during this period at repairing and plumbing. To keep the family
from actual want, the mother has done work by the day, earning
an average of $6.50 a week for something over a year. While she is
at work, the little 3-year-old girl stays at a friend’s house, and before
the mother leaves home in the morning she sets out the lunch for the
three children 6, 12, and 13 years of age, who go to school. .
Their troubles have been complicated by ill health, for the mother
is worn out and sick, though she will not call in a doctor because she
says they can not afford one. Within the year the eldest child has
had an operation for glandular trouble and also an attack of grippe;
the second child has been anemic ever since she had scarlet fever nine
years ago. The relief society helped in arranging for the operation,
and has given aid during the two winters to the extent of $339.22.
The father is now working temporarily for the city at $12 a week.
The family seems to be doing its best to keep up self-respect, and the
home, though plain and somewhat scantily furnished, is clean, welllighted, and well-ventilated, and is in a good neighborhood.
One father lost his job at Thanksgiving time in 1920. During the
13 months since then, he has worked a few weeks for the city and
perhaps five weeks altogether at his old job at a factory, earning a
total of $204. This has been entirely inadequate for the main­
tenance of the family of seven. Since there were no savings to fall
back on, the family had no resource except to go into debt. They
now owe a total of $345.32, as follows:
Grocer................... ................................................ - ................................................ $32.00
B u tch er...................................................................................................................
2 3.0 0
Baker........................................................................................................................
50.0 0
Coal dealer....................................................... ........................(last w inter). .
1 1 .7 5
Coal from c ity ............................................................................. (this y e a r). .
3 1.8 7
Landlord...............................................................................................................- 1 8 2 .0 0
Commissary...........................................................................................................
14. 70

The mother, in order to help, goes out ironing one day a week,
making 75 cents or $1. On the day of the visit made by the bureau’s
agent the 14-year-old girl was staying away from school doing the
family ironing and waiting on the father, who was not feeling well.
She formerly earned a little money caring for children after school
hours, but soon after the beginning of the industrial depression she
lost her job because the neighbors could not afford to pay for that
sort of service.
The 16-year-old daughter left school two years ago, when in the
seventh grade, but did not try to find work until last fall. The school
authorities insisted that she attend the continuation school, so she
went to Chicago to work. The family does not seem to know much
about what she is doing, except that she is in a factory. So far, she
has sent no money home.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Or

D e t a il e d T a b l e B .— M others w orking aw ay fr o m hom e during fa th er's u n em p loym en t.

8
15
22
23
36
39
53
54

16
15
13
12
16
13
17
13

59
63
65
66
69
70
74
75
78
81
89
94
95
100
103
107
118
119
128
132
140
141
148
149
150
154
168

16
21
15
9
14
g
12
15
16
16
g
10
14
13
14
15
16
9
9
13
15
14
13
14
18
15

Mothers
begin­
ning
work
during
father’s
unem­
ploy­
ment.

t/
V
i/
[r

Type of work.

Average
time
per week.

n. r .2 ...........
44hrs..........

V

n. i\ __ . . . . .

\/

42 hrs...........

i/

w
]/

g hrs............
2 das............
1 or 2 das....
irreg............
44 hrs..........

W
[r

g hrs............
12 hrs..........
i/
]/
]/
]/
]/

n. r ..............

16 hrs..........
J da..............

%/

(/

t/


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

i/
i/
V

27 hrs..........
54 hrs..........

Average
earnings Num­
of
per week ber
chil­
when
working. dren.

$3.00
8.00
.87
10.00
3.75
n. r.
2.5Ó
7.50

2
2
4
2
3
3
3
10

5.00
15.00
8.00
n. r.
3.50
1.50
n. r.
16.80
4.00
8.00
2.00
2.50
9.00
n. r.
n. r.
12.00
15.00
n. r.
4.80
.58
1400
n. r.
10.00
6.00
.50
8.10
17.50

2
2
2
8
3
4
3
3
5
2
2
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
■4
2
2
.2
3
2

Age of each child
(years).

9,14....................................
3,10....................................
5,10,12,14.........................
6, 9......................................
2 ,4 ,6 ..............................
1, 3, 5..................................
4, 5, 8......................... .
1, 2, 4, 8, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15,
* 16.
2, 7......................................
13,416................................
6, 7............................ .........
1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14..........
8,10,11..............................
4, 5, 7, 8..............................
5,14, * 17.............................
7,9,13................................
1, 2, 5, 7,10.........................
1, 7......................................
7,12....................................
6,12,13,13.........................
7, 9,11................................
2, 6, 9..................................
9,11....................................
2, 3 ,6 ..................................
1, 3 ,5 ..................................
1, 4, 5..................................
5, 8........ ...................... .
11,13...................................
12,15...................................
3, 8,12,17...........................
12,13...................................
6,16....................................
2, 4......................................
1, 2, 5....... ..........................
5, 9......................................

Caretaker of children under
school age during mother’s
absence?

Father.
Father or child 14 years.
Grandmother.
Father.
Mother takes child with her.
Father.
Father.
Father.
Father, or child 8 years.
Father.
Father, or day nursery.

Father.
Elderly woman.
Father or grandmother.
Day nursery.

None.
Father.
Grandmother or father.
Father or neighbor’s chil­
dren.

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Mothers
Duration working
of
before
Sched­ father's
and
ule
unemduring
num­
p
a
y
­
father’s
ber.
ment
unem­
(months). ploy­
ment.

49090

15
12
13
15
15
17
10
16
16
19
13
9
15
15
16
16
12
7
5
6
16
10
9
20
7
10
16
25
16
12

266
267
271
272
273
277
287
296
301
304
309
311
313
320
323
325
339

8
13
12
19
8
4
7
19
16
n. r.
n. r.
7
7
8
8
14
8

V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
v
V
/
v
V
V
v
V
}/
V
V

Working in cannery...................
Cleaning.............
Washing..................
Picking beans.................

Nursing3___'.........I..............
Housework.................
....... d o ..............................
....... do......... ...........................
....... do..................................
....... do..................................

2 das............
3 das............
n. r . ............
3 das............
irreg............
15 hrs..........
irreg............
40 hrs..........
irreg.............
24 Ürs..........
irreg.............
7 das............
2 das............
8 hrs............
irreg............
32 hrs...........
n. r ..............
16 hrs .............
32 hrs ............
56 hrs.............
n. r .................
33 hrs...........
48 hrs..........
24 hrs..........
n. r .................
15 hrs .............
52 hrs .............
40 hrs .............
20 hrs .............
8 hrs...........

n. r.
5.00
5.00
n. r.
n. r.
7.00
12.65
11.00
n. r.
8.50
n. r.
10.00
.60
2.50
6.50
10.00
7.00
5.00
10.00
10.37
10.00
8.00
12.00
6.00
n. r.
4.00
12.00
11.25
7.50
n. r.

Laundry work.......................
Sewing In store........................
.......do....................................
Daywork................................
Kitchen work in hotel.................
Housework and cleaning..........
n. r......................... ......
Cleaning and washing......... ..
Cleaning...................“ ___
Cleaning and work in factory........................
Cleaning..............................
....... do....................................
....... do...........................
Cleaning and washing...................
Clerking.................. .........................
Laundry work and nlAaning
Rug making...................... “. ......................

20 hrs.............
48 hrs .............
n. r .................
18 hrs.............
48 hrs.............
n. r .................
48 hrs .............
40 hrs .............
48 hrs ............. ’
n. r .................
20 hrs .............
19 hrs___ . . .
24 hrs .............
24 hrs.............
45 hrs.............
16 hrs..........
44 hrs..........

6.00
12.00
15.00
6.50
11.60
n. r
10.00
12.50
12.00
15.00
4.50
5.32
7.50
9.00
10.00
6.00
12.00

Washing...........
Cleaning (washing at hom e)3__
Operating speed drill in factory.
On sugar-beet farm..........
Scrubbing......................
On sugar-beet farm..............
Housework....................
Cleaning..............................
Daywork............... ...............
....... do............................................
Washing..............................
Housework, cleaning.............
Laundry work.......” . . .
Nursing................................
Housework.............................
....... do...............................
....... do...............................

v
v
v
V
v
V
V
V
V
V
]/
V
y'
V
v
y>

V
V

V
V
V

V
V

1Children under 6 years not attending school.
a n. r. signifies not reported.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2
4
3
3
6
3
3
2
3
5
4
2
5
2
4
6
2
4
3
2
6
2
4
2
2
2
5
2
2
4

3, 4..................
6', 8,12, i.4.

6, 10, 12 ...
7, 9, 12...........
2' 3) 8, 8, 9, iö
3 ,5 ,8 ...........
8 ,1 1 ,1 2 ... .
7, 9..........
1,3, 5............
1, 5,12, 14, 16..
7, 9,11,12.
3,12..........
1, 4,-9, 11, 13...
8, 10..........
1, 5, 7,10........................
5. 8, 10, 11, 13, 14
2, 4........
2' 6, 9, 1.2.. .
1, 5, 8 ...............
6' 17............
3' 7, 8,10, 12,13
4, 12.................
4l 8, 10, 12___
7,11......................
7, 9..............
1Ö, 14..........
l,'l, 3, 7,14....
1, 2..........................
1, 2..................
2, 7, 9,15 .........

n. r.

Father.
Day nursery.
n. r.
Father or roomer.
Father or child 12 years.
Child 11 years or nursery.
Father or day nursery.
Day nursery.
Grandmother.
Neighbor.
Child 13 years.
Aunt.
Child 12 years.

Father or child 14 years.
Day nursery.
Mother takes child with her.
Child 15 years in morning;
alone in afternoon.

3 8,1 0,12 ... .
2 1Ö, <16............
2 3, '5............
Father or neighbor.
4 3, 6,12,13. .
Friend.
4 6, 9, 10,13___
2 1, 2..................
Aunt.
4 3' 9,11,13 ___
Neighbor.
5 1, 2, 3, 5, 7...
Father.
2 10, <15..............
2 1, 3............
Father.
3 5, 9,11 ...........
4 1, 4, 7, 9.........
Neighbor.
5 9'12, i 3 ,15,16...
2 5, 6............ ..
5 6, 8,11, 13,14........
3 10, 11, 13..............
7 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8................... Father.
3 Mother working both at home and away from home.
<Working.

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N EM PL O YE D ,

174
175
178
187
196
203
206
212
219
220
222
224
228
229
230
231
232
233
235
237
239
241
242
246
252
253
262
263
264
265

D etailed T a b l e B .— Mothers working away f r o m home during father’ s u n em p loym en t —Continued.

340
344
345
352
357

15
8
15
15
13

362
363
366
367

10
25
2

Mothers
begin­
ning
work
during
father's
unem­
ploy­
ment.
y/
i/

1/

V

Type of work.

Average
time
per week.

16 hrs..........
16 hrs..........
37 hrs..........

¡/

if

V

20 hrs.........

* Mother working both at home and away from home.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Average
earnings,
per week
when
working.

Num­
ber of
chil­
dren.

Age of each child
(years).

$4.50
4.80
13. 50
5.00
9.00

2 11 16...................................
2 5,7......................................
4 6, 9,15,16...........................
6 8' lb, Tl, 13, 415, 416_____
5 2' 4, 9,10, T l....'.................

10.00
7. 80
5.00
7.20

5
5
2
2

1 4, 8, 10, 12.............
3Î3'7] 9, Tl....................
1, .71..'..'.................. .
4,10.................................
4 Working.

Caretaker of children under
school age during mother’ s
absence.

caretaker.

Father or day nursery.

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E

Mothers
Duration working
of
before
Sched­
and
father’s
ule
during
unemnum­
father’s
pay­
ber.
unem­
ment
(months). ploy­
ment.

Or

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

57

EM PLOYM ENT OF TH E CH ILD RE N .11

Family income from children’s earnings.

In the discussion of the family’s resources during the unemploy­
ment period it was pointed out that in 75 families children under 18
years of age had aided in the support of the family while the father
was out of work. The amount earned by the children was reported
for 46 of these families; in 20 families they earned less than $100;
in 11 families they earned from $100 to $199; in 4 from $200 to $299;
in 3 from $300 to $399; in 1, $455; in 1, $550; in 3 from $600 to $699;
and in 3 from $700 to $799. In 3 of the families in which the
children’s earnings amounted to $600 or more, 2 children were at
work.
Attention has been called to the fact that the children’s earnings
were a source of maintenance during the father’s unemployment in
27 of the 136 families for which complete reports were obtained.
In 10 of these 27 families less than 15 per cent of the maintenance
came from the children’s earnings. In 9 families the children’s
earnings made up from 15 to 39 per cent, in 6 from 40 to 69 per cent,
and in 2 families 72 and 86 per cent, respectively, of the entire amount
used by the family.
Number o f children employed.

Of the 148 children 14 to 17 years of age, inclusive, in the 366
families included in the study, 45 had been regularly employed at
some time during the father’s unemployment. A t the time of the
agent’s visit, however, only 32 children were working. In addition
to the 45 children— in 41 families— who were regularly employed,
there were 42 children— in 34 families— who made some contribution
toward the family’s support by working after school, on Saturday,
or during vacations.
Twenty-two of the 45 children who had worked on regular permits
during the father’s unemployment left school to go to work during
the unemployment period, 21 started to work before the father lost
his job, and for 2 it was not reported whether the children went
to work before or after that time. In addition to these there were
4 children who worked before the father’s unemployment but not
after, making a total of 49 children who had been employed at some
time.
Ages o f working children.

Of the 21 children who went to work before the father’s unemploy­
ment, 17 were boys and 4 were girls. Three of these were 15, 8
were 16, and 10 were 17 years of age when they left school and began
working. Apparently it was easier for girls to find work during the
11 See Table I (p. 31), and Appendix A, Tables 19 and 37-41, inclusive. See also the more detailed sections
cm “ Child Labor in an Unemployment Period” and “ Child Labor in Springfield,” pp. 115,120.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

58

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

unemployment period than it was for boys, since only 8 of the 22
who started to work after the father lost his job were boys and 14
were girls. A larger proportion of these children were of the lowest
age— 10 were 15 years of age, as against 3 of those who went to work
while the father was employed; 8 were lb and 4 were 17 years old.
The following list shows the ages of the boys and girls who. began
work before and of those who went to work after the father’s unem­
ployment (for two 17-year-old boys the time of beginning work was
not reported):
Ages of
children.

Began work
Began work
before father’s during father’s
unemployment, unemployment.
Total...................... .........................................................
21
22

. B oys..................................................................................................

17

8

1 5 . . . . .....................................................................................
16 ..........................................................................................
1 7 ........................................
Girls..................................................................................................

3
7
7
4

5
3
............
14

1 5 ........................................................................................................
1 6 ............................................................... ............................ ..
1
1 7 ......................................................................................
3

5
5
4

During the time the fathers were out of work 47 children passed
their fourteenth birthdays; only one of these went to work.
Grades completed by children who went to work.

A comparison of the grades completed by the children who worked
before the father’s unemployment began and those who left school
and went to work subsequently is of interest in this connection.
The grade completed by the 21 children who went to work before
the father’s unemployment is shown in the following list:
School grade
Number of
completed.
children.
T otal........................................................................................................................ 21
Fourth.............................................................................................................................
Seventh................................................
E igh th ......................................................................................
First year high school...........................................................................................
N o t reported..................................

1
4
11
4
1

The grades completed by the 22 children who left school and went
to work for the first time during the father’s unemployment are
listed below:
School grade
Number of
completed.
children.
T otal.................................................................... ................................... ........... 22
S ix th .........................................................................
Seven th ............................................................................................
E igh th ............................................
First year high school...............................
Second year high school............................................

1
4
9
2
1

N ot r e p o r t e d - ,--,............. ...............................................

5


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

59

T H E F A M IL IE S ÖE T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

The high educational requirements for employment certificates in
the States in which these two cities are located are reflected in the
above figures on the grades completed.
The length of time the 45 children who worked during the father’s
unemployment had been out of school is shown in the following list:
Number
of working
QTime since leaving school.
, children.
T o t a l..................................................................... ............................................ 45
Less than 6 months.

4

6-1 1 m onths..............

10

12-17 m onths............

3

18-23 months............

11

24-29 months............

1

30-35 months............

5

36 months and over

3

T im e not reported..

8

Occupations.

The occupations of the 45 children who had been regularly em­
ployed at some time during the father’s unemployment are shown in
the list below:
Occupation.
Boys.
T otal........................................................................... . ...........
27
Factory worker...............................................
Clerical worker.................................................................................

11

7

4

3

Housem aid..............................................
Errand b o y .........................................................................................

Girls.
18

3
3

Telephone operator....................................

2

Clerk in store........ .-.....................

1

1

M achinist’s apprentice.......... .......................................................

2

............

Apprentice in garage..........................

1

............

Telegraph messenger......................................................................

1

............

Laundry operative....... ........................................................

1

Sewing in store............................................

1

Printing...............................................................................................

1

............

N ot reported......................................................................................

3

............

W ages.

Four of the 45 children who worked during the father’s unemploy­
ment earned less than $5 a week; 15 received between $5 and $10;
17 between $10 and $15; and 5 earned $15 or over. For 4 children
the wage was not reported. The children earning less than $5 a
week were 2 boys of 15 and 16 years and 2 girls of the same ages.
The majority of the 42 children working during vacation or after
school worked for short periods or on an average of about one day a
week and the amounts earned were necessarily small. Seventeen sold
papers; their earnings were reported as from 25 cents to $4.50 a week.
The other 25 children worked in factories, on truck farms, in stores,
or in private families as domestic servants or nurse girls.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

60

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

The facts in regard to the employment of children are of special sig­
nificance in relation to the industrial conditions that prevailed during
the unemployment period. The question arises as to whether the
children may not have been given work that was needed by adult
men and women who were unable to secure employment.
S A Y IN G S E X H A U S T E D .12

The previous economic status of the families included in the study,
as well as the character of the fathers as workmen attempting to pro­
vide not only for the present but for the future needs of their wives
and children, is indicated by the fact that 43 per cent had accumu­
lated savings which helped to tide them over the time of unemploy­
ment. Among the families giving complete information in regard to
the sources of maintenance during unemployment, and who reported
the use of savings, 46 per cent had supplied two-fifths or more of their
living by this means. The majority of the families had exhausted
their savings before the time of the inquiry. The effect upon the
families of loss of savings combined with the acquisition of a load of
debts or with the necessity of seeking charitable aid is obvious.
Amount o f savings.

A total of $51,635 in savings was reported as having been spent by
158 families while the father was unemployed. In Racine 97 families
had used up savings amounting to $32,322, and in Springfield, where
the loss of work had been less serious, 61 families had spent a total of
$19,313 of savings. The average amount of savings used per family
in Racine was $333 and in Springfield $316.
The amount of savings that were used up while the father was out
of work prior to the time of the agents’ visits to the families is
shown in the following list, for the two cities combined:
Number of families
Savings spent during unemployment.
reporting savings.
Total number of families reporting savings............................. - 158

Less than $100..................................................- ............................
$100, less than $200.................................
$200, less than $300........................................ - ..............................
$300, less than $400.............................................. ........................
$400, less than $500.........................- ................................. - ..........
$500, less than $600.......................................- ......................... - —
$600, less than $700........................................................................
$700, less than $800..................................................................
$800, less than $900— ............1......................... - ........ - -------- - - $1,000, less than $1,100...................................................................
$1,200, less than $1,300.........- ........................................................
$2,000, and over...................... i ............................... - ..................
Amount not reported......................................................................
12 See Table I (p. 31), and Appendix A, Table 19.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

23
18
22
21
H
9
7
8
2
6
2
3
26

T H E F A M IL IE S O F T H E

UN EM PLOYED.

61

Charitable aid in relation to savings.

The information regarding the relation between savings and
charitable aid furnishes an especially significant indication of the
straits into which unemployment forced these families, and of the
character of the families. In Racine 49 of the 141 families that had
received aid had been tided over a part of the time by savings
reported as ranging from $45 to more than $2,000. In Springfield
18 of the 50 families given aid had used savings amounting to from
$30 to $800. The effect of the longer and more general unemploy­
ment problem in the former city is here evident.
One of the most disheartening facts brought out in the study is
that 42 per cent of the 158 families reporting savings at the time
the father was thrown out of work had been compelled to seek
charitable aid. And in this connection it must be remembered that
the families were still suffering from unemployment, and many of
those who had not asked for relief might have to apply for it before
the father was again regularly at work.
Loss o f hom es.

The agents making the study reported that many of the families
who had bought their homes during the time of the post-war industrial
prosperity or even earlier, making monthly payments on the interest
and principal of the mortgage, were now facing the loss of the homes
and of the money invested. That the mortgages had not already
been foreclosed appeared to be due, in some cases, to the fact that
there was no market for real estate during the time of depression,
and the high prices for which the houses had been sold to the owners
made it more desirable to let the sales stand than to foreclose, even
though the payments lapsed for some months. But at the time of
the study a considerable number of families were daily expecting
that the loss of the home would be added to their other hardships,
and that the money they had already paid in would be forfeited.
Families who had used up their savings.

Stories of individual families will give a clearer idea of the serious­
ness of the loss of savings than can be gained from statistical data.
One family had economized and saved for years, denying them­
selves many of the comforts and all of the luxuries of life. They
had never gone to movies or spent money for any kind of recreation.
When the father lost his job a year ago, the mother said that the
only thing left to cut down on was food, and this has been done to
the limit. The family used to take 2 or 3 quarts of milk a day, but
now they get 1 quart of whole milk and 1 of skim milk. This has to
suffice for the four children, whose ages are 4, 6, 7, and 9 years.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

62

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

The father was a coremaker at an implement factory. Though
he had been employed steadily, he found it impossible to get ahead,
for all the money saved was paid out in doctor’s bills for a crippled
daughter. Three years ago the family decided to buy a house “ on
contract.” They chose one in a respectable residential neighbor­
hood, a two-story 7-room frame house, with inside toilet and electric
lights. In addition to the initial payment the family had paid $1,260
in monthly installments when the depression came. Now they feel
they can not continue to pay the $35 a month, nor afford the upkeep
of so large a house, so they are offering it for sale or in trade for another
on which the payments will be lower.
The father w orked irregularly at his old job for two months dur­
ing the past year, and also four weeks for the city. His earnings
and the board paid by his brother, who lives with them, make a
cash income of $460 for the year. The family owes $100 for groceries
at a local store and $112 to the commissary run by the father’s
former employers. The relief association has furnished $26 worth of
coal and groceries, and the church has given money for fuel, clothing,
and food. The father says that the family could not have managed
at all without this assistance. All insurance policies have been
dropped, because the payments could not be kept up.
The father of an exceptionally industrious and ambitious Ukranian
family is a pleasant-appearing man of about 50 years, a blacksmith
by trade, capable of earning an average of $175 per month. The
mother, 40 years old, has been laid up for five months with a sore
knee. The doctor says the cartilage is loose. She is in such pain
that she can not sleep. The father and the children have been doing
the housework, and a neighbor comes in to bake bread.
There are five children, the oldest of whom, a girl of 16 years, is
in Chicago taking nurse’s training. The others are 4, 7, 11, and 14
years of age.
The family is buying the house in which it is living. This is a
two-story frame building, which the family remodeled, painted out­
side and in, papered, and wired for electricity just before the father
lost his employment. The parlor, shut off for the winter, had been
newly furnished, but the rest of the furniture was old, though in
good condition. The living room was crowded with furniture,
including a bed in the corner. It was overheated by a small, rusty
coal stove. The washing was hung on the chairs to dry.
The mother says that during the first years of their married life
they despaired of ever getting ahead. Though the father was mak­
ing fairly good wages, their expenses increased as the children came
and they could do no more than break even at the end of the year.
The mother planned carefully and bought for cash, trading where
she could get the most for her money. After the last child was

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

TH E

F A M IL IE S O F T H E

UN EM PLOYED.

63

born, the mother decided to help out, and for two years she worked
in a cracker factory. In this way they managed to save $1,500 dur­
ing the two years, and this they invested in the stock of a municipalservice corporation. The following year they started buying a house,
borrowing $500 from the bank for the initial payment. The place
was in bad condition, and the father used all his surplus, even going
into debt, to have it repaired. The consequence was that when the
father lost his job 13 months ago he had nothing on hand. In order
not to have to sell his stock, he applied to the city and to the relief
association for a loan until work started up again. The loan was
refused, and he was advised to sell his stock. This he did, and after
paying $500 to the bank, his 1920 taxes, and the various bills for
repairs he had $435 of his $1,500 investment left for living expenses.
This was used for food only. The father has earned only $83.12
since he lost his job, and the second floor, which rented for $25 a
month, has been vacant for five months. When the savings were
gone, they were unable to get credit and they had to ask for help
from the relief association. The mother wept at the thought that
the earnings of those two hard years were gone with nothing to show
for them.
The mother has cut down expenses as much as possible. She
takes 1 quart of milk a day instead of 2, though the children beg for
milk on their oatmeal. She gets no meat except the 3 pounds a
week with the commissary orders. They live chiefly on bread,
coffee, potatoes, and cereals. The most urgent need at present is
clothing— the children’s underwear is thin and worn, and the oldest
boy has no waists for school. The teachers are urging the mother
to send the youngest boy to school, but he has nothing to wear but
thin cotton suits.
^
The situation seems to be getting more difficult every day. The
parents gave up insurance policies the premiums of which came to
$5 a month, and the surrender value of these was applied on the
future payments of remaining policies. They .are five months in
arrears for payments on the house, $150 interest is due, and also
the 1921 taxes of $105.98. Altogether they owe $338.75. The
electricity has been cut off, because of a $5.30 bill. The daughter
in Chicago is badly in need of clothing, but the mother has nothing
to send her. The mother refuses, however, to allow the girl to drop
the nurse’s training course and go to work, since in one more year
she will be able to earn at least $25 a week. Both the mother and
father are very proud of her.
One father came from Armenia to America 11 years ago, full of
hope that he would make money and soon be able to send for his
wife and baby, whom he had left behind. He was a common laborer,
and because he was willing and industrious he easily found work.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

64

U N E M PLO Y M E N T AND

C H IL D W E L F A R E .

He worked hard and steadily, living as cheaply as possible, and meas­
uring his income not by his earnings but b y what he was able to save.
After he had been in America only a few months he received the
news of the birth of his second child. Before long there came rumors
of Armenian massacres, and word of the desperate need of his own
family and of other relatives. He sent them as much money as
possible, and still continued to lay aside a small amount monthly
with which to bring his family over. By January 1, 1920, the father
had managed to save $1,950, so he quit his job and went back to
Armenia. He found his friends and relatives on the point of starva­
tion, so he kept only just enough of his money to bring to America
himself, his wife, and one child, and gave away the rest. He could
not afford to bring the second child, so left her with his uncle. When
the family landed at Ellis Island they had just $100 left, which was
spent for railroad fare to the city where he had been employed. The
father, however, was not worried, for he was confident he would get
his old job back. When they arrived there, the factory where he
had formerly worked had been shut down, and there was no work
whatever to be found. His immediate need of work and money
was the more pressing, because his wife gave birth to their third child
two days after they reached the city.
The father has walked the streets in vain to find work and has
called daily at the employment office, yet in the year since his return
to America he has earned only $142.80. He was not known in the
neighborhood, so was able to obtaip. credit only to the extent of $25.
When this was exhausted he turned to his “ partner/7 from whom
he has borrowed a little at a time until he now owes $500, and this
friend can lend him no more.
The family is living in one of a row of small frame houses built
flush with the sidewalk, and with narrow passages between them.
The interior contains only the most necessary articles of furniture,
but it is spotlessly clean. They live very meagerly, using very little
meat, no fruit, no cakes, and they are buying no milk, though the
mother realizes that she should have it for the baby. She has had
no new clothes since she left Armenia. The mother demands very
little— says she only wants a crust of bread and that just to be safe
in America is heaven.
A Polish family after 10 years of hard work and strict economy
has managed to pay off the mortgage on a home. Although the
neighborhood is not very desirable, the house is well built and is
located on a good-sized corner lot, neatly fenced in. The furnace,
electric lights, and gas range with which the house is equipped, as
well as the inside toilet, were added by the family and have also
been paid for, in spite of the fact that there are six children. The
oldest boy, 19 years of age, has been in the Navy for three years and

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S O F T H E

U N EM PLOYED .

65

has not given much help financially. The other five children range
from 4 to 16 years.
When the father was laid off over 11 months ago the family was
free from debt and had a small savings account of a hundred dollars
or so. He has worked very little since then— one week for the city
and two days a week for a couple of months weeding onions on a
farm. The mother, well accustomed to planning carefully and living
cheaply, made what money they had last as long as possible. When
it was gone she obtained credit at the local stores to the extent of
about $45, when she was told she could not have more. She then
was obliged to apply for charity. The relief society sent groceries
and fuel worth $33.76, and the Red Cross helped for two months.
However, the assistance given was not adequate, and neither organi­
zation wanted to help them because they owned their house. “ Can
I eat the house?” said the mother sarcastically. “ People who rent
are better off.” She says no one wants to rent the upstairs rooms
because the family has so many children. The mother is very bitter
about present conditions. The family is behind on insurance pay­
ments to the extent of $55.73.
A Bohemian family, father 45 years old and mother 43, b y years
of economizing had managed to raise a family of eight children—
the oldest 21 and the youngest 1 year of age— and in addition to save
enough to buy a house. At the time the father was laid off in
August, 1920, the house was clear of debt, and the family had $1,000
in the bank. The three eldest children had worked and had done
their share toward putting the family on its feet. The father and
the oldest two boys all lost their jobs about the same time. One of
the boys was on a strike and received $8 a week strike benefit from
the union. During the past 17 months the father has worked about
6 weeks, earning a total of $103. The 18-year-old daughter is the
only one who has had steady work, and she has turned every cent
of her $70 a month over to the family.
At the time of the agent’s visit the father had just drawn the last
of the savings from the bank. The family has lived as economically
as possible, but they have come to the end of their resources, and the
father feels that the only thing left to do is to sell the house. He is
very unhappy about it, but it seems his only alternative.
THE

BURDEN

O F D E B T .13

Extent and forms o f indebtedness.

Of the 366 families 83 per cent (303) had incurred debts because
of the father’s loss of work, or were unable to continue payments for
which they had obligated themselves while the father was working.
is See Table I (p. 31).and Appendix A, Table 19.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

u n e m p l o y m e n t and ch ild w e lfar e .

66

In Racine the proportion was higher than in Springfield— 91 per cent
as against 69 per cent. The largest number of families— 240, or 66 per
cent of the total visited—were in debt for food supplies. The next
largest proportion (43 per cent) were in arrears with rent or the
periodic payments on their homes. Medical attendance had bur­
dened with debt over a third of the families, and almost an equal
number had been obliged to borrow moneys The details as to the
kinds of debt follow. The different groups include many of the same
families, since four-fifths of the 303 families had debts of more than
one kind.

Per cent of 366
families reporting
Num- debts incurred for

Kind of debt.

Loans............................................
Food.......... ...................................
Rent................... . .........................
Payments on house, taxes, interest
Medical attendance..................... .
Fuel, gas, light..............................
Insurance premiums. ....................
Furniture............. ........................
Repairs on house...........................
Funeral expenses..........................
Merchandise............... ..................
Other items...................................

ber.
117
240
83
75
127
57
55
33
17
7
5
16

each object.
32
66
23
20
35
16
15
9
5
2
1
4

A total of $81,629 in debts was reported for the 303 families— an
average of $269 per family. Two hundred and ten families in Racine
had debts amounting to $70,423, or an average of $335 per family,
and 93 families in Springfield owed $11,206, or an average of $120 per
family.
The amounts of indebtedness are shown in the following list:
Amount of debt.

Total..

Number of families
reporting debts.

.................... 303

Less than $100............
$100, less than $200....
$200, less than $300__
$300, less than $400__
$400, less than $500__
$500, less than $600__
$600, less than $700__
$700, less than $800__
$800, less than $900__
$900, less than $1,000..
$1,000, less than $2,000
$2,000 and over..........
Amount not reported..

85
69
49
29

21
16
3

8
3
3

8

2
7

Proportion of maintenance secured through credit or loans.

Prom only 106 of the families reporting the debts incurred was it
possible to secure adequate information on the proportion of the total

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

TH E

F A M IL IE S

OF T H E

67

UN EM PLOYED.

family resources during the unemployment of the father which the
debts represented. For these families the figures are as follows:
Number of
families
reporting.

Per cent of total fam ily
resources represented by debts.

........................ 106

........................
...........................
.................................
70 and over..................................- ............... ..................................

1K +r>3Q

........................

25
38
34
9

More than two-fifths of these families derived over 40 per cent of
their maintenance through credit or loans, nearly a tenth of the
families had to incur debts for 70 per cent or more of their entire
living expenses.
The fathers in all the 303 families reporting that they had gone
into debt in order to provide the family’s livelihood and also in the
remaining 63 families not reporting debts, were still out of regular
employment, and so long as this condition continued, and steady
income through wages was cut off, the burden of debt would keep
on piling up.
The cost o f cash loans.

A number of the families visited had secured loans for small
amounts from a company having branches in various parts of the
country. Its method of lending was very attractive, in that money
could be secured quite readily, and the borrower, in dire need of the
funds, did not figure on the total cost in interest and penalties. On
its face, the plan seemed to lend money at 6 per cent interest. The
usual amount borrowed was $100, and separate loans were made
for each $100. To secure a loan two guarantors, or “ comakers”
had to sign the note and they became equally liable with the bor­
rower for repayment. Men who had secured loans stated that they
sometimes had to wait as long as two weeks for an answer as to
whether the loan was to be granted.
The borrower was given $94 for every $100 for which a note was
given— that is, 6 per cent interest for a year was deducted at once,
and borrowers were told they were getting the money at 6 per cent.
Beginning'with the Saturday after the loan was made, the borrower
was required to make weekly payments of $2 for every $100 bor­
rowed. The payments thus extended over a period of 50 weeks.
If any payment due was not made by the time the office closed at
noon on Saturday, a fine of 5 cents on every dollar due was added,
and an additional 5 cents was added for each dollar for every week
it remained unpaid. An additional charge of 50 cents was made in
case the borrower lost the little coupon book in which payments were
receipted. Usually loans were not allowed to run more than two
weeks without payment. By this plan the borrower at no time had

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

68

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

the use of the full $100. He had the use of the $94 for only one week
or less, and then the loan was reduced at the rate of $2 a week, until
at the end of the forty-ninth week the borrower had the use o f only
$2, although he had paid in advance 6 per cent interest on $100 for a
year.
It is obvious that this method of securing money to tide over
emergencies became a serious drain on the weekly resources of the
family during a time when the income was very uncertain. It was
used, apparently, not to help out on the current living expenses of
the family, but to satisfy requirements for the outlay of a consider­
able sum that had to be met somehow at once, even though the con­
tinuing payments on the loan meant the depletion of the already
meager weekly resources.
Families who had mortgaged the future.

A few examples of families who had become heavily burdened by
debts will serve to illustrate the situation in which a large proportion
. of families found themselves after the father had been out of work
for a few months.
An Italian family consisting of father, mother, and four children
ranging from 2 to 10 years of age, is heavily in debt. The father is
42 years old, and has been in the United States 10 years. He has
recently passed the examination for his citizenship papers but can
not afford the $4 necessary to obtain them. He is a laborer and a
steady worker and eager to get ahead. In 1920 he earned in the
neighborhood of $2,000. Three years ago he began buying a sixroom house on land contract” — the monthly pa.ymp.nt. of $20
covering interest on the mortgage and a small payment on the
principal. The house is comfortably furnished, having a good dining­
room set and a victrola and a leather davenport in the parlor.
The family had not been able to save, because the house was old
and in need of repairs, they needed furniture, and the poor health
of the mother had necessitated large expenditures for doctors and
medicine. As a result, the father was utterly unprepared for the
long period of unemployment which came upon him without warning
in October, 1920. The family was favorably known in the neigh­
borhood, so obtained credit and struggled along for over a year
without asking public aid. The father’s total earnings during 14
months were $28, which he made at work for the city. To add to
their difficulties the mother had to undergo a serious operation, the
bills for which are still unpaid. Also, the father’s brother died, and
the father had to share in the funeral expenses. Since credit was
cut off in November, 1921, the family has been receiving one grocery
order a week from the city commissary, and also was given a Christ-'
mas basket and some clothing by the relief association,

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

69

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

The mother has cut down living expenses to the limit. She takes
less milk, and no meat, fruit, or sweets. The meals are practically
all alike— bread, coffee, and spaghetti, or bread, coffee, and beans.
The children’s outside clothing is holding out pretty well, but their
underwear, which was cheap to begin with, is tom, thin, and much
patched. The day before the agent’s visit a large amount of plaster
had fallen from the dining-room ceiling, and the father has managed
to buy “ on trust” the materials to repair it. The rooms need re­
papering badly. The payments on the house are seven months in
arrears, and the father fears he will lose it.
The fam ily now owes:
Groceries...............................................................................
M eat..................................................................................................................

$400
15

Shoes.........................

10

Clothing..........................................................................................................

80

Doctor’s b ill..........................
Hospital b ill...................... . .........................................................................
Repairs to house....................
U n cle’s funeral___ *.............................................................

114
28
155
55

Paym ents on house....................................................................................
Cash borrowed........................................................................................

140
155

T otal...................... .............................................................................

1,15 2

To this must be added what they owe the city commissary.
Both the mother and father are nearly frantic with worry. The
mother has a great deal to do at home, yet she has been walking the
streets looking for work. She broke down and cried over the situa­
tion. The father figures that even if work begins at once it will take
him at least 10 years to get out of debt. He dreads the time when he
begins earning again, for he will be working for less pay, every one
of his creditor will want to be paid immediately, and his family
must live.
A family consisting of father, mother, and five children, ranging in
age from 9 months to 9 years, occupies four small rooms on the
second floor of a three-story frame building, above two stores. The
halls are dingy and dirty, and the air vile with stale tobacco smoke
and the odor from the toilets at the head of the stairs. One bedroom
which opens off the dining-room has no window, and is just large
enough for a double bed. The father, mother, and two children sleep
here. The rooms were orderly but not very clean. The furniture
was worn and shabby.
The mother says she never had been in such need. They had
never been able to save because they had so many children to feed
and clothe, but they had always been able to pay cash for everything.
The mother has a great fear of debt, and of accepting charity. The
father has been out of work for 10 months now, but has been called
back to his old job occasionally for a few weeks at a time, so that he

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

70

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

has managed to earn about $200. Except when he had temporarywork there was nothing to do but go in debt, for the children had to
eat. The family owes $300 for groceries, $15 for milk, $8 for gas, *
$70 borrowed from friends, $18 on a baby carriage which they bought
just before the father lost his job, and $33.80 to the city commissary.
In addition, they owe $80 for rent, and the landlord is becoming very
disagreeable. “ Landlord want to kick us out,” the mother says.
“ My man say ‘ You get me job, I pay rent.’ I don’t know what he
going do.”
The mother has always been economical but now has not even the
necessities. She used to get 2 quarts of milk a day, now gets only
1. She said she did not realize they could get along on so little. The
clothing was old and worn. The aid society has given $93 worth of
groceries and milk and also considerable old clothing. When the
mother feels badly about accepting charity, the father, who came
from Italy 17 years ago and took out his naturalization papers as
soon as possible, tells her, “ We good citizens. We help America.
Now America must help us.”
The father strained his back while working last fall and was in a
hospital in Chicago for a number of weeks for examination and treat­
ment. He is better, but his back is still not very strong. The mother
says he refuses to go to the aid society for their weekly grocery order
and also refuses to care for the children while she does so. “ My
man no like kids— no like bother when they cry.” Consequently,
the 9-year-old girl is kept home half a day every week while the
mother goes after the groceries.
A Polish father, a machinist 36 years of age, has been in the United
States 20 years and was progressive enough to take out his naturaliza­
tion papers. His wife, an American-born woman, is 33 years old,
and they have 5 children, 2 boys and 3 girls, ranging in age from 7
months to 13 years. They live in a pretty little bungalow, most
attractive from the outside, shrubs around the house, a comer lot.
The inside of the house presents a great contrast. Several of the
rooms have been shut off for the winter. There are no mgs on the
floor, and the furniture is much battered and worn.
The father has been out of work for 16 months, with only one
month’s work on a farm and four weeks’ work for the city to help out
during that time. The total earnings were $85. The family has been
buying the house. This has taken every cent over and above what
they needed just to live on, so they had no savings to fall back on
when the father lost his job. The last child was born after the
father was laid off, which meant an added expense, and two of the
children have been ill enough to need a doctor. The family is now
so deeply in debt that the father doubts if he ever can get paid up
again. After exhausting their credit with the local grocers and

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

71

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

borrowing all they could from friends they turned to the commissary
run by the father’s former employers, where they have been allowed
to run up a large bill. The debts are as follows:
Groceries......................................
M eat............................... ................
B read............................................ .
Paym ents on hou se..................
T a x e s..............................................
Doctor’s b ill.................................
M idw ife’s b ill..............................
Borrowed from M e n d s . . . . . . .
City-commissary account.......
Factory-commissary account

. $200
.

100

.
.

75
540
105
3

20
.
.

300
56
229

T o t a l .................................................. ........................................................ 1 ,6 2 8

In addition, there are arrears for insurance on the house and the
father’s life insurance, but the father can not tell just how much is
due on them. The family has also had charitable aid. The relief
association has given groceries, milk, fuel, and clothing amounting
to $133.
The mother now takes 2 quarts of milk daily instead of 3. They
are living on charity entirely at present. They have meat only
when the father gets an odd job and they can pay cash for it. The
electricity has been shut off because the family can not afford it, and
several of the rooms have been closed to save fuel. At the time of
the visit the father was neatly dressed, but the children were playing
around with scarcely any clothing on.
The father of a family of four children, 7, 12, 13, and 15 years of
age, earned $21 a week as a laborer in a brickyard, but in the eight
months of his unemployment he has earned only $108. During this
time the family income has been supplemented by $42 earned by the
eldest boy and by $41 received from the insurance company as the
cash value of a policy on which payments had been made for 10 years,
representing a loss of $89. During the summer the mother had
helped the situation by taking the three younger children with her to
Connecticut, where she was able to earn their support. The family
lives in a house owned by the brickyard company and are compelled
to buy groceries, except bread, at the company store. They owe
$58.10 for rent and food.
A Hungarian family is living in a small one-story house, with
garden space in the rear. The house is very damp—frost on walls,
doors, and floors, and the room supposed to be a kitchen is too wet
for use. The family was obliged to move here because unable to
pay the rent ($25) of the former home, which had electricity, gas,
and a bathroom. The house they now occupy has stove heat,
kerosene lights, no gas, and an outside toilet.
4 9 0 9 0 °— 2 3 -------6


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

72

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

The parents have been in the United States 18 years. There are
five children— two boys of 7 and 8 years and three girls of 10, 12, and
16. The father, a molder, was laid off 14 months ago. He had but
$250 saved and this was soon used up. He picked up what odd jobs
he could— pointed three houses in return for three months’ rent,
worked for the city—in fact did anything that would help the family
along. Since November, or for the last two months, he has been
working for $4 a day five days a week, so the family is getting along
better at present. Shortly after the father began,his present job he
cut his finger to the bone while splitting wood and lost three weeks’
work. The mother dressed the finger to avoid a doctor’s bill. The
oldest girl works when she can find anything to do. She was em­
ployed in an ice cream parlor for several months, but was laid off
last July and could not find another job until November, when she
went out to do housework at $4 a week.
The mother has had difficulty in getting credit in the neighborhood.
“ Butcher no want give me meat. On Saturday give only 1 pound—
not enough for a big family.” The landlord of their former house,
she said, did not want them because of their race, and told them to
get out. A coal man near by let the mother have a ton of coal. The
mother had a small garden last year. “ Lady from association see
garden, say *Got much fine garden— lots to eat.’ But it is only green
stuff— that give me no bread or lard. I can’t eat only that with my
big family.” The mother is in wretched health. Seven years ago
she used to go out washing every day; now she is scarcely able to do
her own housework—has to wash one day and hang out the clothes
the next. The second daughter was ill and required the services of
a city nurse for two weeks.
The family has had charitable aid to the extent of $101.49 and the
debts amount to $187.60:
M eat and groceries.

$ 9 3 .0 0

Bread...........................

1 6.0 0

Coal..............................

8. 75

Clothes........................

5 .0 0

Insurance...................

6 .8 5

R en t (former home)

4 5 .0 0

D entist........................

5 .5 0

Doctor.........................

7. 50

An Armenian father came to America in 1909, worked hard, and
saved about $3,000 so that he might bring his wife and child from
Armenia. When he went after them in October, 1919, he found his
wife and child and a few relatives the only survivors of a large family.
He gave all the money he could to assist his relatives. Then he and
his wife and child came to America, bringing with them his sister’s
child, a girl of about 14 years, who is paralyzed. The father began
work at an implement factory as soon as he got back and was kept

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

73

on until 6 months ago. What little money he might have been able
to save he spent in doctors’ bills for his niece, taking her first to one
doctor and then to another. Finally he asked the relief society to
help him, and they are trying to get the girl into a hospital.
The family lives on the second floor of a two-story house in bad
repair, in a neighborhood of factories and railroads. The entrance to
the rooms is by a very dark hall and stairway. The home is fairly
well furnished, though not orderly. A second child is now a year
old.
Since the father was laid off he has worked a week for the city and
about a month and a half in another city, where he repaired oriental
rugs. He earned a total of $237. He says that they can live on
much less food than Americans, and get along with canned goods.
They buy less milk and just half as much meat as formerly. They
ran up a $156 grocery bill, and then credit was cut off. They
have borrowed $325 from relatives, owe $35 on furniture, $96 for
six months’ rent, and $35 to his former employers. The father has
had to drop his insurance. Relatives in Armenia beg him for money.
The father has told them that he is hard up, but they pan not be­
lieve him. He hopes to be able to borrow a few dollars to send
them.
During the past 10 months an Italian father has earned $192 by
labor on the city sewers, and the only additional income has been
$100 paid as damages when he was run over by an automobile.
This last sum met the rent for five months. Since there are five
children—-although the mother is but 23 years old— debts have been
incurred for food, rent, and medical care. In an attempt to meet
some of the payments due, the father borrowed $200 on a plan which
involves high interest and had the unhappy result of losing him
further work from the city government. The family is now in debt
nearly $1,100. While the father was steadily earning $30 a week
as a metal worker, they bought furniture, clothing, and a playerpiano on the installment plan, meeting the payments regularly until
he lost his job. Of the total debt, $600 is for the piano which will
probably be taken away from them soon; the sum already paid on
it will be forfeited. Twenty-five dollars have been lost through the
lapsing of insurance payments. The home is squalid, the children
are badly in need of clothes, and it is apparent that they have
altogether too little to eat.
A painter who was forced to stop work last August because of lead
poisoning, bought a horse and wagon and tried to make a living for
his family by peddling fruits and vegetables. This venture was an
unfortunate one, because his customers failed to pay their bills; and
in October, because he was unable to meet the payments due on the
horse and wagon, he lost the money ($125) already paid on them.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

74

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

In the past four months the family— consisting of the parents,
seven children ranging in age from 2 to 14 years, and a grandfather
have subsisted on what the father has earned at a few scattering
jobs, the $5 a week which the grandfather pays for room and board,
and the total of $48 which the mother has earned at crocheting
bags. Friends have given some clothes, and are supplying the family
daily with skimmed milk. Although there are seven children, most
of them at ages when whole milk is indispensable for health and
growth, this is practically all the milk the family is now getting.
For two weeks the father has been peddling fruit, clearing about $2
a day. The parents have fallen behind with their insurance and are
heavily in debt for rent, groceries, and medical attendance. Be­
sides the fathers’s illness, he and two of the boys had the “ flu,” and
the 5-year-old boy was severely burned. The mother expects soon
to get temporary work nursing a friend, during which time the eldest
daughter, who is 14 and attending the afternoon session of the high
school, will presumably have to stay out of school to care for the
smaller children.
D et ail e d T a b l e C.— Debts incurred or unpaid because o f u n em p lo ym en t.1
Amount of debts for—
Average
Duration monthly
Sched­ of unem­ resources
ule
during
ploy­
num­
unem­
ment
ber. (months).
ploy­
ment.

Loans.

Gro­
ceries
and
meat.

Fuel
and
light.

Pay­
ments
on
Doctors,
dentists, house
Arrears
(includ­ Rent in on in­
midarrears. surance. Other.
ing
wives,
mort­
hos­
pitals.
gage,
interest,
taxes).

$65.00
$1.60
' $2.00
$157.26
$57.24
16
3
65.00
$300.00
75.59
16
8
4.00
38.11
35.61
15
17
10.47
116.00
172.00
41.60
20
21
$285.00
219.55
71.44
14
26
50.00
97.63
400.00
15
29
50.00
23.7i
155.11
63.00
13
39
45.00
202.57
83.84
8
40
50.95
400.00
84.24
17
42
72.00
200.00
300.00
50.46
17
43
$3.23
1.24
251.97
$3.00
237.69
60.34
13
49
6.93
238.89
9.00
54.13
60.63
50.00
8
50
10.00
30.91
51
8
137.00
46.38
55
16
379.57
44.11
56
14
47.00
67.00
25.00
300.00
81.09
58
15
78.00
6.00
167.34
50.00
60.54
16
59
100.00
8.00
69.00
30.00
54.19
10
60
1.00
18.37
52.00
300.00
15
62
43.43
49.35
63
21
132.00
6.00
75.00
246.73
25.00
69.56
13
64
60.00
5.00
29.92
120.00
13
68
45.00
222.26
49.70
9
69
132.00
150.00
120.36
8
74
335.00
352.00
222.59
236.03
12
76
420.00
2.00
14.00
15
79.33
78
38.00
71.00
66.22
44.96
16
79
10.00
72.93
103.28
500.00
14
84
69.93
44.44
8
85
210.00
66.85
483.00
18
86
100.00
30.00
30.00
136.80
67.80
20.00
6
88
28.00
146.00
71.83
43.88
16
89
154.00
5.00
83.00
72.84
8
90
35.00
117.00
4ÒÓ.ÓÒ
106.03
8
91
1 Includes only the 104 families reporting debts and average monthly income during unemployment.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

75

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D ,

D etail e d T a b le C .—

D e b t s i n c u r r e d o r u n p a i d b e c a u s e o f u n e m p l o y m e n t — Continued.

Amount of debts for—
Average
Duration monthly
hed- of unem­ resources
ule
during
ploy­
umment
unem­
eer. (months). ploy­
ment.

94
96
102
103
109
111
112
118
125
126
127
136
137
139
140
145
146
152
153
162
165
168
177
179
180
184
185
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
196
198
199
200
201
202
203
205
208
209
210
212
217
219
220
222
223
229
231
236
237
246
249
252
253
258
282
306
307
309
312
331
347
358
359
361

8
16
15
13
11
12
15
15
17
23
8
13
13
6
13
10
14
13
14
4
10
15
9
13
13
12
11
15
13
12
13
15
9
12
15
16
10
15
15
13
17
10
17
13
8
16
12
16
19
13
13
15
16
9
6
19
13
7
10
17
12
10
8
n. r.
9
13
14
24
15
7

Loans.

$62.85
88.01
94.63 $1, 000.00
180.00
90.98
35.00
63.39
42.99
80.00
40.06
300.00
85.16
250.00
69.25
37.75
99.36
115.45
400.00
97.97
325.00
152.50
126.05
20.00
35.11
20.36
51.38
30.29
36.57
48.26
148.56 1,400.00
44.51
83.48
37.48
56.84
20.00
85.28
52.14
82.67
120.00
65.25
20.00
123.29
350.00
73.09
100.00
56.33
500.00
53.84
200.00
83.40
62.51
200.00
33.10
100.00
56.98
136.62
150.00
40.28
500.00
70.94
70.00
79.63
35.00
60.81
150.00
157.34
75.00
25.73
56.77
44.59
295.00
54.11
235.00
65.46
60.88
25.00
56.07
150.00
119.71
109.29
67.28
250.00
168.47
53.70
86.09
41.10
300.00
58.14
205.00
118.01
91.30
37.63
58.24
n. r.
100.26
46.53
111. 94
65.76
32.15
• 62.70


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Gro­
ceries
and
meat.

$30.00
12.00
39.75
5.92
154.77
75.88
50.00
199.84
107.08
50.00
1.50
360.00
156.00
250.00
113.14
165.93
94.38
20.00
80.00
86.17

Fuel
and
light.

$5.00
35.00
$13.00
34.00

8.75
16.00
35.00
7.00
4.38

22.50

$35. GO
$54.00

105.00
250.00

194.75
63.00

12.00

12.00

89.73
64.15
25.00
77.97

4.00

200.00
35.00

500.00
15.00

32.00
355.00
7.00

225.00

10.00

18.00
210.47

8.00
19.00

10.00

15.00
76.00
55.00

21.00
48.00

20.00
52.00

25.00

160.00
60.00
135.00
20.00

200.00

3.90

8.00
60.00
39.00
8.00

80.00
40.00
5.28

68.00

39.50
112.00
105.82
28.49
53.63
97.00
150.72
90.00
108.46

35.00
30.00

81.00
163.66

30.00

8.75
44.00

100.00
41.35
45.00
52.00
165.00
348.80
32.80

$100.00

$5.00

197.00
269.31
131.13
27.00
100.00

100.00

Pay­
ments
on
Doctors,
dentists, house
(includ­ Rent in Arrears
mid­
on in­
Other.
arrears. surance.
ing
wives,
mort­
hos­
gage,
pitals.
interest,
taxes).

207.00

31.00
12.00
5.00

6.04

32.00
8.00

75.00
18.00
50.00

78.00

372.00
4.00
150.00

90.00

45.00
4.00
55.00

. 46.00
70.00
28.30

31.09
10.50

7.01

27.00

19.00
2.21

18.00

30.00
34.00
3.00
5.00

15.00
120.00

75.00
100.00
300.00

110.00
150.00
66.00

25,00

9.00
156.00
66.00

8.14
24.00

9.00
66.00

28.00

16.00

10.00

76

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Credit for food supplies.
In order to secure information concerning the extent to which it
was possible for families to get food supplies on credit, and especially
in regard to tlm comparative prevalence of such debts during the
period of unemployment and the period preceding, neighborhood
grocers were interviewed. The stores from which information was
sought were those patronized by the families of unemployed men
included in this study. The results of these interviews are set forth
below.
1. This store is located in a good residence neighborhood, where
most of the families own their own homes. It is a grocery store with
a rather large stock of perishable vegetables and fruits, no meats
except smoked meats and these in a very small quantity. Not many
of the customers who trade at this store pay cash. The grocer said
that most customers ran a bill for from two weeks to a month and
then paid when the father received his pay. At the present time he
has 300 families on his books— 100 of these are families in which the
father has been unemployed for more than 1 year. •He has had to
refuse credit to 12 families from which he never expects to receive
what is due him. The total amount due from 100 families in which
the father is unemployed is approximately $6,000— amounts varying
from $25 to $200. Most of the fathers the grocer thinks are honest
and will pay when they are again employed. Some who have had
temporary work for a while have paid a small proportion of what they
owe and then continue to buy on credit.
2. A double-store building— one side used for dry goods, the other
for groceries, bakery goods, and smoked meats. The amount of
credit given to a family depends upon circumstances and the family’s
reputatioh and the length of time they have been" trading with him.
The grocer watches the purchases pretty closely but finds most of the
families buying on credit choosing wisely and reducing their pur­
chases to the minimum. He has about $5,000 on his books, repre­
senting 200 families with bills varying from $25 to $250. The year
has been a terrible one.. He did not have the heart to refuse credit,
and bit by bit he used up all his reserve funds just keeping things
going. All his life’s earnings have gone, Mr. X . says. He feels that
fully one-half of this will never be paid, for already those owing the
largest amounts are moving— some to -other neighborhoods and others
out of town. Many of the families owing bills are ashamed to come
to his store, so go elsewhere when they have a little cash—which he
feels is unfair. Those customers to whom he had had to refuse further
credit are getting deeper in debt at the city commissary every day,
and since this will be deducted from the man’s pay every week it, of
course, will be paid off first. Bills to the local merchants will be paid
last, if at all. He feels that the city commissary, while a blessing to
the poor families/has made it hard for the merchants, for it has taken

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E

UN EM PLO YED.

77

«away the cash trade that used to be given them by the public and
private relief agencies.
3. Small butcher shop and delicatessen. The proprietor is not giving
much credit this winter. He is carrying about 15 or 16 families well
known to him, to an amount of about $300, but his trade is chiefly
cash. Said he learned his lesson last year. At one time he had
$4,000 on his books and had to borrow money at the bank to tide
him over. The greatest part of that has been paid now, but it came
in slowly. He felt this year would be worse than last. He thinks
that the people did not properly appreciate being C(carried,” and
says that he noticed no difference in their buying, when doing so for
credit or for cash. The majority refused soup bones and the cheaper
cuts of meats and ordered steaks and chops. He seems to feel that
the men won’t look for work very seriously while they are able to get
meat and groceries on credit.
4. Medium sized well-equipped and well-stocked store. Fruit and
green vegetables upon display. The grocer also .carries brooms and
other household utensils. Most properous appearing store of any
that agent has visited. Has been in business here since April, 1921,
and is carrying on his books some of the people that the former
owner had. He tries not to close any accounts unless the family
makes no effort to pay. Many of his credit customers had been in
the habit of charging their groceries and then paying the bill weekly
or monthly. Now, however, some of them have not been able to
keep the bill paid up. Some of his customers would have been
getting aid from the relief society if he had not extended their credit.
This grocer thinks that for the most part people are buying very
economically. Several customers came during the interview and the
agent noticed that all but one charged their purchases.
5. Family of owner lives in the rear of the store. Fairly wellstocked shelves, mostly canned goods although there were apples
and oranges and cabbages in the window display. The grocer
carries no meat except a little cooked meat. Not much bread is
sold, because most families are now making their own bread. Average
about 12 quarts of milk per day and other sales consist mostly of
bread and potatoes. The grocer has 10 or 15 families on his books.
Most of these are also getting groceries at the city commissary and
therefore give very little trade to the store. The largest bill on the
books at time of the interview was $41.36. Other accounts run
between $5 and $10 apiece. The grocer admitted that it was better
for the families to buy from the commissary because they could get
things cheaper. Families whom grocer is carrying pay a little each
week. They buy only what is absolutely necessary.
6. The store has a small line of goods, mostly canned vegetables;
shelves about half empty. Owner can not replenish the stock because
he can not collect bills due him. He had about $700 on his books at

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

78

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

time of visit. He has no limit set for credit but allows families to*
get according to what he thinks they are good for. At present has
15 or 16 families on his books. So far thinks he has lost only about
$100 in bad bills. Few people have moved away without paying.
7. Father small grocery store on business street and car line. It
carries staple and fancy groceries, flour, feed, lime, and cement. The
manager said he knew all of his families and in the last year had not
taken on any new families for credit. He carries about 100 families
on credit. At the end of the year 1919 these 100 families owed bills
amounting to $1,200. These same 100 families at the end of the year
1920 owed $1,700 and at the end of 1921 owed $3,300. Most of
these families own their homes, and the manager said he knew he
would get all of the money. In the three years he had been running
this store he had lost only $250 by people moving away.
8. A fair-sized, attractive looking store, carrying a good line of
fruit, fresh vegetables, etc., in addition to staples and dairy products.
This store has extended credit to 90 or 100 families, to a total of
$6,000. Can not make ends meet, so have had to refuse further
credit in most cases, though they hate to do it. They feel that
fully one-half of this is “ bad debts/’ not so much that the families’
intentions are not good, but that they are so deeply in debt that
they never will get out. Since the comissary accounts must of
necessity be paid first, the merchants may never receive their money.
The prospect looks even more discouraging because when the men
do go back to work it wdll be at less pay and possibly for shorter
hours. One customer lost his house last week and left town sud­
denly, owing $290. The amount of credit depends upon circum­
stance. They have been lenient with old patrons who paid regularly
and some of these families have run bills as high as $250 or $300.
To other families not so well nor so favorably known they have
limited the amount to $25 or $30. Most of the families buy econom­
ically, but occasionally a man or woman orders extravagantly.
The quantity of milk sold remains about the same but there has
been a perceptible drop in the demands for butter. Very little
fruit or sweet stuff is purchased now. Mr. A carries less than onethird as many boxes of cookies and cakes as formerly. Aside from
depriving themselves of fruit, sweets, and butter, the grocer does
not feel that the families have been lowering their standards of
living the past year.
9. The store is a combination meat market and grocery with
bakery goods, candy, and smoking supplies on the side. It has
much less stock on hand now than before, because there is much less
demand. The owners are now carrying on their books 50 families
whose fathers are out of work, and have been for the last year and a
half. The total amount due from these families is about $5,000,

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

79

the amounts varying from $10 to $200. The grocer interviewed
feels they will be very lucky if one-half of what is owed them is paid.
Many families have moved away from the district, some out of the
city, and from these they expect nothing. Some people come in
with a good story that the husband has a job and they will pay the
first pay day; they are given credit for a couple of weeks and then
are never seen again. Only necessities of life are given on credit
by these grocers. Bakery goods are a serious problem. Many of
those to whom credit is given have been refused credit at bakeries.
The grocers discourage charging jpread and cakes, but are very will­
ing to give flour on credit to those who will use it.
10.
The store is located in the “ Flats,” a district where people
of the poorer class live—many of whom are renters. The store is
a combination meat market, grocery, and bakery; and carries candy,
tobacco, and some dry goods. Previous to this time the grocer has
kept a very large stock on hand, but at the present time all the stock
which he owns is on the shelves. The grocer is at present carrying
25 families whose fathers are unemployed, and in most cases he has
been carrying them for more than a year. The total amount owed
by these families up to date is $1,501, the smallest amount being
$10 and the greatest amount $160. In addition to these 25 families,
the grocer has been forced to refuse credit to 10 other families, the
total amount due from them being more than $800, which amount
the grocer says he never expects to receive. He still has some
families, possibly 10 or 15, who rim bills and pay every two weeks.
These, together with the few who pay cash, help him to continue in
business. His business has fallen off 50 per cent during the year.
C H A R IT A B L E A ID B Y P U B L IC O R P R IV A T E A G E N C IE S .14

Assistance given the fam ilies.

The families selected for visiting represented, as nearly as possible,
a cross section of families of unemployed men in the two cities.
The data in regard to the aid given these families by public or private
relief agencies should, therefore, be of special significance, as showing
the degree to which families of \yorking men are likely to need such
assistance when the misfortune of unemployment overtakes them.
Of the 366 families, 191— over half— had received charitable aid
during the father’s unemployment, some of which, however, was
very small in amount. In Racine three-fifths of all the families
received such assistance; in Springfield the proportion was lower
but still over one-third. It has been pointed out that the period of
serious unemployment had been of considerably longer duration in
the former city, which undoubtedly accounts for the greater propor­
tion of families seeking aid.
H See Table I (p, 31), and Appendix A , Tables 28-31, inclusive.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

80

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Interval between loss o f work and application for aid.

The following list shows, for each city, the time that elapsed after
the father lost his regular work before the families applied for assist­
ance.
Families aided, Families aided,
Interval before application for aid.
Racine.
Springfield.
T otal........................................... . .....................................
141
50
Less tlian 1 m o n th .....................................................................

6

5

1 -2 months....................................................................................

33

4

3 -5 months....................

42

6

6 -8 m onths.............................................•.......................................

19

5

9 -1 1 m onths................................................. »...............................

12

2

12 months and over....................................................................

6

N ot reported..................................................................................

23

28

In terms of percentages, it is seen that of the 140 families in the
two cities for whom the interval before the application for aid was
reported 8 per cent applied for charitable aid within less than a
month of the time when the father became unemployed. Twentysix per cent applied within 1 or 2 months; 34 per cent within 3 to 5
months; 17 per cent within 6 to 8 months; 10 per cent within 9 to 11
months, and 4 per cent when the father had been unemployed a year
or longer. Thus, more than two-thirds of the families who were
aided had been unable to maintain themselves by means of their
other resources for as long as half a year after the regular employ­
ment of the father ceased. Since over one-half of all the families
received aid, this means that approximately one-third of all the
families visited in the two cities were forced to seek charitable aid
within six months of losing their regular incomes. It is probable
that a family would neither apply for, nor be granted, charitable aid
from public or private agencies until all other resources had been
exhausted. This supposition is borne out by data presented earlier
in this report in regard to loans and debts, and especially debts for
food. There is, of course, to be taken into account the important
but less readily demonstrated factor of the deprivation endured by
many families who do not apply for aid. .
Duration o f aid.

The length of time over which 'charitable aid to these families
extended is shown below:
Duration of aid.
T o ta l..

Number of families report­
ing duration of aid.
__________
141

1 -2 months...........................................................

5
17

3 -5 m o n th s.. , ......................................................................................... . . ...........

21

6 -8 months........................................ . ...............................g.............................. ....

21

9 -1 1 m onths...................................
12 months and over..............................................................................................

62

2 weeks, less than 1 m on th ...............................................................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

15

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E U N E M P L O Y E D .

81

Aid extending over periods of six months or more had been given 70
per cent of the families. More than one-third of the families had
been given aid amounting to $100 or more.
CHART 3ZI.

IN T E R V A L B E T W E E N LOSS OF WORK AND
APPLICATION FOR A ID
1 4 0 FAM ILIES A P P L Y IN G F O R C H A R IT A B LE AID

9-11 !2months
Under I 1-2
3 -5
6 -8
month months months months months and over
Aid to fam ilies o f skilled and unskilled workers.

Bearing in mind the extremity represented by application for
assistance, especially on the part of families that have always been
self-sustaining, it is surprising to find that almost three-fourths of
the men in the families receiving charitable aid had been skilled
workers, and only one-fourth had been employed at unskilled labor.
Looking at these facts from another angle, it is found that 50 per
cent of the families of skilled workers visited had received charitable
aid, and 58 per cent of the families of the men who had done work
classed as unskilled. The similarity of these percentages indicates

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

82

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

the stress in which the families of higher- as well as of lower-grade
workers had found themselves when employment ceased.
The information regarding length »of time between loss'of work
and application for charitable aid showed practically the same situa­
tion in the cases of skilled and of"unskilled workers.
Relation of aid received to total resources.

For only 65 families in the two cities was it possible to secure
apparently adequate data regarding the relation between the amount
of charitable aid and their total resources. The findings, expressed
in percentages, were as follows:
Relation of charitable aid
Number of
to total resources.
families.
T otal................................................................................................................... 65
Less than 5 per cen t.................................................................................................

20

5 -9 per cen t.....................................................

12

10-14 per c e n t..................................................

13

15-19 per ce n t................................................

8

20-24 per ce n t......................

5

25-29 per ce n t.............................................................................................................

2

30-39 per ce n t.............................................................................................................

4

65 per cen t............................................................................................................

1

For half these families charitable aid formed more than a tenth of
their total resources during the entire unemployment period. This
implies, of course, that during a part of the period considerably
greater proportions of their maintenance were received from public
or private relief agencies. A later section of this report discusses
charitable aid from the point of approach of the relief agency and the
general relief problem resulting from widespread unemployment.
The present analysis based on two representative groups of families
affected by unemployment is the more valuable as showing the effect
of loss of work on families previously having an income adequate to
maintain a good standard of living.
Illustrations of families that had been compelled to seek charitable
aid are included among those given in the preceding sections. When
the man could not find work, the usual steps in reaching the stage of
dependency were: First, the use of savings or the employment of
mother or children when it was possible for them to get work; second,
seeming loans or credit; third, applying for charitable aid when aid
from relatives and other resources had been exhausted.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

D etailed T a b l e D . —

F a m ilie s r e c e iv in g c h a r ita b le a id d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t o f f a th e r .

Other resources during the unemployment period.

Charitable aid.
Sched­ Num­
ber
Age of each
ule
of
num­ chil­
child (years).
ber. dren.

40
42
58
59
62
63
78
86
88
91

3

8 in 13
7 6 11 14
l ’ s V m ’ is
1*3 K 7 8
1V s' ’ ’
3 ’ ' rlr>
2_| 3 5
10 12 16 17
S s fi’ o 9
ii
2 s’ 7 ’ * ’ •
3 12 3
2 13 16
5 1 91 5 7 1(1
1Vi '
5

3
5

s’ fi' 1 Ì ’ ’
1’ ii’ 7
l ’ s'fi 8 1(1

$2 n2 i

non
ijoon
2 341
1 5nn
1*700
1*874
9.

1 700

13
8
17
13
8

1 742

16
15
21

2 nnn
s ’ 770

2 568
n. r.

118

31 i ’ s’ s’
2_ s’ s’
11 S fi
4 fi' li ’ifi 17
i ’ s à fi’
i ’ y s’
1’ 9l’ fi
3_ s’ fi’ 8’ ’ ' ’

15
20
14

1 831
9. 1S2
1 287
I'swn
2 *nnn
1*701
1*000
n. r.

15
16
14
18
6
8
8
16
15
15
17
23
13
10
13
12
17
10
17
16
14

Duration of aid.

Income
Relation
Chil­
from
to total
Father's Mother's dren’s boarders
Total
receipts amount.
earnings. earnings. earnings.
and
(per
lodgers.
cent).
11.3
25.3
18.9
.9
23.9
11.5
6.8
18.2
15.1
12.3
5.1
12.9
10.8
14.3
34.0
19.5
2.0
19.9
13.3
1.2
19.5
1.3
2.7
8.2
1.2
16.9
19.5
5.6
9 .1
1 1 .6
1 1 .9

$60
211
189
14
201
79
96
140
74
150
50
102
114
166
244
276
24
23
200
67
16
278
16
32
69
17
84
93
39
104
1& '
97
183
21
10

$33

325
36
116
34
58
322
84
56
40
80
177
250
88
295
250
192
57
175
119
353
100
195
300
63
459
83
170
345
581
150
200
311
78
152

$196

$200

72
200

200
700
375
300
400

$4

149
51

600
500
200

5

60
150

Sav­
ings.

$100

484
168
300
272

87

52

80
42
1,000
150

125
550

165
580
211
100

25
128

17.5
2 7V ’
95
2 .3
2 253
10
mos.,
15
das___
.6
3 , 400
5 4 , 7,9, Ì4, Ì6___ Molder................
215
1 Includes only the 49 families in which the amount of charitable aid and the family income during unemployment were reported.

30
125
66

326

Total
amount
includ­
ing char­
Debts. itable
aid.

$42
298
505
450
228
250
451
497
359
439
301
319
43
588
180
588
693
316
552
135
12
1,044
785
763
137
232
329
216
149
437
779
525
558
593
1,000

$531
834
1,002
1,480
842
687
1,418
772
489
1,229
936
798
1,051
1,160
719
1,414
1,181
396
1,007
502
1,381
1,422
1,271
1,200
849
1,469
496
479
633
1,147
1,229
822
1,052
912
1,554

T H E F A M IL IE S

17
21
26
29

Income
for year Duration
of un­
Father’s previous previous employ­
to un­
occupation.
ment
employ­ (months).
ment.

O

00

CO


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

D e t a il e d T a b l e D . — F a m i l i e s r e c e i v i n g c h a r i t a b l e a i d d u r i n g u n e m p l o y m e n t o f f a t h e r — Continued,

Charitable aid.
Sched­ Num­
ber
ule
Age of each
num­ of
child (years).
chil­
ber. dren.

220
223
231
243
249
259
278
312
319
329
356
357

3
3
5
3

6

5
4
5
4
5
3
3

2
5

1,4,6............... Laborer..............
1,3,5............... Welder...............
1,5,12,14,16...
1,9,12.............. Laborer..............
5,8,10,11,13,14 ....... do.................
1,3,7,8,15....... Factory hand___
7,10,13,16....... Carpenter...........
3,5,7,12,14.... Die*repairer.......
1,4,5,8............ Machinist...........
2,5,8,14,17.... ....... do.................
3,4,6............... Carpenter............
10,14,16.......... Machinist..........
2,4................... Molder................
2,4,9,10,11....


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

$1,287
n. r.
1,864
1,380
n. r.
n. r.
2,860
1,660
1,820
n. r.
n. r.
n. r.
n. r.
n. r.

12

16
19
13
16
13
13
14
14
9
3
14

12

13

Duration of aid.

9mos., 26 das.......
7 ïno’s., 26 das.......
11 mos., 27 das___
1yr., 21’ das..........
11 mos., 29 das___
7 mos., 8 das.........
3 mos.j 18 das.......
2 mos.^ 13 das.......
5 mos.’..... .............
5 mos., 28 das.......
1yr., è das............

Other resources during the unemployment period.

Relation
Income
to total
Chil­
from
Total
Father’s Mother’s dren’
receipts amount.
s
boarders
earnings. earnings. earnings.
(per
and
cent).
lodgers.
9.9
5.4
7.4
31.9
.5
39.8
9.0
4.0

6.0

10.7
7.1
18.8
2.3

2.1

$61
48
92
226
9
209

101
47
72
93
16

200
13
9

$435
270
63
171
1,216
7286
638
934
328
560
Ì2Ò
436
505
76

Sav­
ings.

$122

$45
$667

524
387
311
198
30

$47

300
284
27

200

126

800
400

377

Total
amount
includ­
ing char­
Debts. itable
aid.

100

110
¿6
100
25

$618
887
1,256
708
1,723
'¿25
1,133
Ï! 18i
l'200
872
236
1,061
618
462

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E

217
219

Income
for year Duration
of un­
Father’s previous previous employ­
occupation.
to un­
ment
employ­
ment. (months)..

00

85

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.
TH E COINCIDENCE OF ILLNESS AND UNEM PLOYM ENT.

Extent of illness.

It is obviously impossible to attempt to relate unemployment of
the breadwinner and illness in the families as cause and effect, defi­
nite as the correlation may seem to be in certain cases, since there is
no basis for a comparison of the prevalence of illness in the families
of unemployed men with its extent among families in the general
population. It is, however, important to call attention to the very
considerable proportion of families in which sickness or accidents
were added to the misfortunes incident to the father’s being out of
work. Often the incapacity of the father prevented him from earn­
ing something at temporary work or the illness or disability of the
mother made it difficult for her to give her family the necessary care.
It is, moreover, evident that families that were using up their
savings or were dependent largely on food secured through credit, or
were being supplied with necessities by charitable agencies, would
frequently deprive themselves of food required to maintain health
and strength. Insufficient clothing and lack of fuel, together, with
the inevitable lowering of sanitary standards through crowding
together in order to keep warm, to economize on rent, or to add to
the income by letting rooms can not fail to affect the health of the
members of the family.
In nearly a fourth of the 366 families the mother had given birth
to a child or was expecting confinement during the time the father
was unemployed. Coming at a time when the family was deprived
of ordinary comforts or was actually suffering for want of proper food,
this meant undue worry and hardship for the mother, with greater
probability of ill health for both mother and child. Illness or dis­
abilities, including pregnancy or confinement, during the time of
unemployment were reported by 231 families— 63 per cent of the
entire number. These families included 852 children— almost twothirds of the entire number of children.
The folio wring list gives the number of families in which the
various members were ill:
Members of families ill.
T otal...............................................

Number of families
reporting illness.
231

M other.............................................................................................................................

52

Father.............................................................................................................................

12

One or more children.....................

58

Mother and father......................................................................................................

10

Mother and one or more children.................... ..................................................

64

Father and one or more children........ ...............................................................

11

Mother, father, and one or more children........................................

24

The seriousness of the situation is evidenced by the fact that threefourths of these families reported one or both parents ill, while only

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

86

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

68 per cent of them reported illness among the children. Under
ordinary circumstances it would he expected that more families
would report illnesses among the children than among the parents,
especially since.several contagious diseases had been epidemic among
children in one of the cities studied.
Debts for medical care.
Doctors’ bills and hospital care comprised a very considerable
part of the burden of debts which would continue to oppress these
families long after the father resumed work. Judging from the con­
ditions reported by the families, many were going without needed
medical attention. Others were receiving medical aid through the
companies that had employed the men, from free clinics or dispen­
saries, charitable societies, or the city poor department. The longer
duration of unemployment in Racine is reflected in the information
given by the families regarding doctors’ bills, and debts for confine­
ment expenses, and hospital care. Although a larger proportion of
the Springfield families reported illnesses during the father s unem­
ployment, many of these were apparently not of so serious a nature,
or else the families still had sufficient funds to pay the bills. A total
of 128 families— more than a third of all the families visited--said
that they had outstanding debts for medical service. The amounts
of these debts were given by 76 of the 85 Racine families, and by
32 of the 43 families in Springfield. More than a fourth had debts
amounting to $50 or more for the services of doctors, dentists, mid­
wives, and hospitals.
'

Amount of debt.

Number
of families
reporting.

T otal................................................ - .............- - - . - ..................................... f t 108
Less than $ 5 0 ...............................................................................................................

^8

$50, less than $100....................................... - ...........................................................
$100, less than $200.............................. .......................... - ................... - - - - - - - - -

16
8

$200 and over.................................................................. **- - - - •..............................

6

The amounts reported by the families in the last group were $200,
$210, $272, $275, $437, and $500. Only 1 of the Springfield families
reported outstanding debts of $100 or more, while 13 of the Racine
families had the larger amounts.
Seven of the Racine families were in debt to undertakers. The
siv who stated the amounts of this indebtedness owed from $22 to
$85 for funeral expenses. The aggregate indebtedness because of
illness or death was $5,772.50 for a total of 108 families.
Unemployment among fam ilies given nursing service.

It was not possible to secure general information regarding the
prevalence of unemployment among the families who were receiving
medical or nursing care in the two cities. Certain data were, however,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE

F A M IL IE S OF T H E

UNEM PLOYED.

87

secured from the Visiting Nurses’ Association of Springfield concerning
70 families under its care in February, 1922, in which the father was
unemployed. These figures are of special interest in connection with
infant welfare.
In 53 of the 70 families there was a newborn baby or the mother
was expecting confinement. As has been pointed out elsewhere in
this report, this situation adds to the handicap of the loss of the
father’s earnings and the need of relieving the mother of some of her
household duties, and interferes with her efforts to increase the family
income through her own earnings. It means in every case some added
burden of expense, even though the nursing service is provided free.
Of the babies bom in the city during the entire unemployment period,
many who did not come to the attention of the visiting nurses must
have been handicapped, even before birth, by the hardships incident
upon the loss of a steady family income.
In these 70 families reported by the Visiting Nurses’ Association
there were 188 children, of whom more than half were under 3 years
of age, a fifth were between 3 and 6 years, and only 3 were of possible
working age. Two of the 70 families had no children, and in 23
families there was only 1 child. A total of 34 families had 2, 3, or
4 children. In 8 families there were 5 children, 2 families had 7,
and in 1 family there were 11.
Almost half of the 70 families had received assistance from a public
or private relief agency or other organization. The leading relief
society in the city had given aid to 17 families who had not been
helped by any other agency, and to 10 others who had received
assistance from the city poor department, children’s aid or protective
societies, churches, dispensaries, and other organizations. The city
poor department was the only agency helping 2 families, and was
one of the agencies aiding 11 other families.
The foregoing facts are not given as representing a complete report
on the prevalence of unemployment among families given nursing
care by this organization. The information is necessarily incomplete,
because it relates only to the families that the nurses on the staff of
the association had visited recently, and about which they were,
therefore, informed at the time of the inquiry.
49090°—23---- 7


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

88

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

D e t a il e d T a b l e E .— F a m i l i e s r e p o r t i n g i l l n e s s d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d o f t h e f a t h e r ’s u n e m ­
p lo y m e n t.1

Sched­
ule
No.

Duration of
unem­
ployment.

16mos. 4 das

Employ­
Average
ment of
monthly mother. Num­
ber Age of each
resources
child
of
during
chil­
(years).
unem­ Away
dren.
At
ploy-. from
ment. lome. aome.
4

n. r.a

4
5
n. r.

5

$41.60

5

5

3
54.22

2

n. r.

5

n. r.

13 mos. 26 das.

V

4
5
5
3
3
2

63.00

;

3
3

83.84

3
2

50.46

7
5

60.63

19m os.8das...

3

268.09
4411

3
3

81.09

6

]/

60.54

2

5419

3

52.00

3

49.35
13 mos. 5 d as..

1/

69.56

]/

2
2

1 ,3 ,5,7 .... Child 5 years, typhoid, scarlet fever,
measles; child 7 years, diphtheria,
scarlet fever.
6,9,11,13.. Child 6 years, pneumonia.
2,4,6,7,8.. Mother sick; child 7 years, always has
been weak; child 8 years, sore throat.
9mos.,2,5, Father, rheumatism; mother, confine­
ment; child 6 years, pleurisy, pneu­
6,8.
monia; child 8 years, scarlet fever.
1,3,4,8,10. Father, pain in side; child 4 years, fever
105°, blood running out of mouth.
4,7,9,11,14 Father, operation; mother, ill “ inside
and in head” ; child 4 years, stomach
trouble.
10,14,16... Mother, tumor, sick for a long time,
died in April, 1921.
6,8............ Children 6 and 8 years, scarlet fever,
city nurses, 6 weeks (no doctor).
2,4,9,10,12 Child 9 years, tonsils removed; child 10
years, diphtheria, tonsils removed;
child 12 years, weakly, tonsils re­
moved.
1 ,3 ,5,6 .... Mother, womb trouble; child 6 years,
rheumatism.
7,8,10,12, Father, cut his hand; mother, stomach
trouble; child 12 years, bad cough
16.
and colds.
4, 6, 8, 11, Child6 years,mumps; children4,8, and
11 years, scarlet fever (no doctor).
16,16.
2,4,6......... Father, in hospital (illness not given);
mother, pleurisy.
4mos.,4,6. Father, kidney trouble; mother con­
finement; child 6 years, scarier fever.
lim os., 7.. Mother, confinement; child 11 months,
ill; child 7 years, diseased tonsils,
undernourished.
1,3,5......... Mother, nervous breakdown; child 3
years, diphtheria.
1, 3, 5 ....... Mother, pregnant; child 5 years, hurt
head.
2 mos., 2,4 Mother, confinement; child 4 years,
scarlet fever and diseased tonsils.
10,10......... Mother, influenza twice, ill now (stom­
ach, throat, nose, and head).
2,4,6,9,11, Mother, confinement (baby died); child
4 years, colds.
13, 14.
3,5,6,9,9.. Mother, operation; child 5 years, chills
and fever; children 6 and 9 years,
scarlet fever; whole family has had
colds.
Father,
rheumatism; mother, opera­
10,13,15...
tion, died June, 1921.
Child
4
years,
pneumonia.
4,5,8.........
6,8,10....... Father, blood poisoning; mother, “ sick
inside” ; children 6 and 8 years, ton­
sillitis.
5 mos, 4,6, Mother, confinement; all the children
had scarlet fever and diphtheria;
8, 9,11.
child, age n. r., died; child 8 years,
measles.
2,7............ Father, stomach trouble; child 7 years,
scarlet fever, tonsillitis.
2,4,5......... Father, tubercular; mother, scarlet
fever and diphtheria; child 4 years,
scarlet fever and diphtheria.
1,2,3......... Father and mother and all children had
“ itch” ; mother, confinement; child
1 year, boils, undernourished.
13,16......... Father, influenza and rheumatism;
mother, stomach trouble, swollen
foot; child 13 years, undernourished.
2, 4............ Children 2 and 4 years, scarlet fever.

i Includes only a partial list of the families reporting illness.
■ N. r. signifies not repeated.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Illness reported by family.

THE

F A M I L I E S OF T H E

UNEM PLOYED.

89

D e t a il e d T a b l e E .— F a m i l i e s r e p o r t i n g i l l n e s s d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d o f t h e f a t h e r ’s u n e m ­
p l o y m e n t — Continued.

Sched
ule
No.

66

Duration of
unem­
ployment.

Average Employ­
ment of
month!}
mother. Num
resource.
ber Age of each
during
of
child
unem­
chil­
(years).
ploy­ Awa;
At
dren.
ment. from home
home

n. r...................

ÿ

8

i/

3
3
5

67

14mos. 10 das.

69
74
78

8 mos. 22 das.. $50.00
18 mos. 7 das -. ! 120.36
14 mos. 19 das..
79.33

79

16 m os............

44.96

3

82

15 mos. 15 das..

84.05

3

84

13 mos. 21 das..

103.28

6

87
88

10 mos. 25 das..
5 mos. 26 das ..

n. r.
67.80

2
3

3

f

4 mos., 2,
4, 6, 8,
10, 12,
14.
7, 9,14___
2 ,4 ,5 ... .
5, 14, 17...
5 mos., 2,
2, 5, 7,
10.
10 mos., 2,
6.
2, 4, 7 .. .

6, 8, 10,
12.
4, 7...
l ' 5, 7 . . .

90

8 mos. 3 d as...

72.84

2

1 ,2 ....

95

9 mos. 29 das..

n. r.

i/

3

7, 9 ,1 1 ...

100

13 mos. 18 das..

n. r.

]/

3

2, 6 ,9 ...

102

15 mos. 1 d a y ..

94.63

4

5, 6, 8, 9.

105

13 mos. 10 das..

n. r.

5

8 mos., 2,
6,10,12.

106

16 mos. 17 das..

n. r.

2

2, 6............
9,10..

108

16 mos. 25 das..

n. r.

2

112

14 mos. 24 das..

40.06

3

1 ,3 ,6 ...

118

14 mos. 28 das..

85.16

3

1,3, 5 . . .

120
121

13 mos. 8 d a s..
15 mos. 3 das. .

n. r.
n. r.

3
6

122
123

8 mos. 15 d a s..
11 mos. 25 das..

n. r.
n. r.

]/

Illness reported by family.

Mother, confinement; child 4 years, ill;
child 4 months, undernourished, sick
since bom ; all children pale and
emaciated.
Father, rheumatism; mother, operation
needed.
Mother, operation.
Mother, overwork after operation.
Mother, confinement; children 10, 7,5,
2 years, all mumps; child 2 years,
eczema.
Father, bad cold; mother, poor teeth,
pregnant during unemployment, has
had two operations; children, 10
months, 2, (f years, bad colds.
Father, stomach operation, rupture';
mother, operation, diphtheria, sleep­
ing sickness.
Mother, confinement, heart trouble
and rheumatism; child 12 years,
heart trouble.
Mother, confinement (baby died).
Mother, needs operation; child 1 year,
convulsions.
Father, bad colds; mother, miscarriage
all children, colds.
Father, inflammatory rheumatism;
mother, kidney trouble; child 11
years, leakage of heart; all children,
whooping cough.
Mother, premature birth, operation
later; child 2 years, tonsils removed;
all children, bad colds.
Mother, rheumatism; child 5 years,
whooping cough.
Mother, confinement; child 12 years,
diseased tonsils, threatened with
tuberculosis; child 2 years, abscess
on eye, children 2 years and 8 months,
undernourished.
Child 6 years, whooping cough; child
2 years, pneumonia, whooping cough,
and baa cold.
Mother, nervousness; child 10 years,
diphtheria.
Mother, rheumatism, goiter, nervous­
ness.
Mother, confinement; child 5 years,
nervous, rundown; children 5, 3, 1
years, bad colds.
Children 17 and 10 years, scarlet fever.
!hild 8 years, pneumonia; child 4
years, bad cold.

129

8 mos. 19 d as..

n. r.

6

135
142

12 mos. 26 das..
16 mos. 6 d a s..

n. r.
n. r.

3
3

9 ,1 0 ,1 7 ...
1, 4, 8, 10,
15,17.
3, 4, 7.......
3 mos., 3
mos., 2,
birth of twins.
4,6,7.
1, 5, 7,10, Child 11 years, diphtheria.
11,12.
10, 12, 14..
10 mos. 6,

143

13 mos. 22 das..

n. r.

3

i f 5i*6.

145

9 mos. 19 d a s..

35.11

3

.........

3
6

V

several times.

46

13 mos. 19 das..

n. r. ......... .........

6

5.
9 mos., 2,
7, 8, 13,

150

13 mos. 22 das..

n. r.

2

2 ,4 ....

152

12 mos. 20 das..

52.73

3

treatment.
2 ,1 1 ,1 3 ... Mother, sprained arm; child 11 years,
diphtheria; child 2 years, influenza.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

v

ment.
J v u / i o j v u r Ui UUUXC/J o u u i u u n a v e

A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .
- F a m i l i e s r e p o r t i n g i l l n e s s d u r i n g th e p e r i o d o f th e f a t h e r ' s u n e m ­
p l o y m e n t — Continued.

Employ­
ment of
lontnly mother.
¡sources
luring
unem­ Away
ploy­ from At
ment. home. home,

Lverage
nealle
lo.

Num­
ber Age of each
child
of
chil­
(years).
dren.

156

n. r.

, 3, 7, 9,
11.

161

n. r.

164

n. r.

169

n. r.

,9,12,13,
15,17.
4, 11, 13,
15,16.
6 ,9 .......

173
174

n. r.
n. r.

1, 6,9 .
3 ,4 ....

179

$83.48

8 mos. 4,
6, 8.

180

37.48

9 mos., 7,

182

n. r.

12,16........

186
187

n .r.
52.14

190

123.29

194

n. r.

195

n. r.

196

76.80

198

n .r.

203
205

70.94
79.63

209

157.34

212

56.77

213

n. r.

214

n .r.
n.r.
49.49
n .r.
65.46

119.71
n. r.
109.29
n. r.
n .r.
n .r.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

8.

4,9,14.
7,9,12.

Illness reported by family.

Mother, pregnant; child 3 years, put
her eye out; whole family quaran­
tined for scarlet fever.
Children 17 and 1 years, influenza.
Child 16 years, operation.
Child 9 years, whooping cough; child
6 years, pneumonia.
Child 6 years, scarlet fever.
Mother, operation; child 4 years, sub. normal and “ fits” ; child 3 years, ton­
sils and adenoids removed.
Mother, confinement; child 8 years,
broke arm; child 6 years, cut blood
vessel.
Mother, confinement; child 7 years, ton­
sils and adenoids removed.
Mother, rheumatism; child 12 years,
diphtheria.
Child 9 years, influenza.
Father, pneumonia; mother, general
' breakdown.
Mother, rheumatism; child 6 years,
diphtheria; child 9 years, scarlet fever

1, 3, 6, 9,
11,13,15,
17.
4, 7,12,14. Father, operation; mother, appendici­
tis, miscarriage.
,
9 mos., 7, Child 4 years, kidney trouble, died
August, 1921.
.
9,11.
2, 3, 8, 8, 9, Children 3 and 2 years, diphtheria;
child 15 years, tonsillitis.
15.
Father, diphtheria; mother, confine­
1 ,5 ,6 ..
ment, blood poison, influenza, leak­
age of heart; child 1 year, bronchitis;
all children, diphtheria.
Child
3 years, scarlet fever.
3 ,5 ,8 ..
9 mos., 3, Father, strained back while at work,
in
hospital.
5, 7, 9.
1,4,5,7,9, Mother, operation.
12.

Mother, general health not good, com­
plication following influenza.
4, 7,11,14. Father, grippe; mother, sore knee;
child 11 years, scarlet fever.
5 ,6 ,8 ....... Mother, operation; child 5 years, ton­
sils and adenoids removed, epileptic;
child 6 years, mumps.
Mother,
not very strong, open sore on
6, 10, 13,
ankle resulting from operation 2 years
14,16.

7..........

5 mos., 4,6. Children, 4 and 6 years, scarlet fever.
1, 4, 7,10, Child 4 years, diphtheria and pneu­
monia; child 1 year, broken leg.
12.
1,5,12,14, Father, leg broken and foot crushed,
run over b y auto; mother, confine16.
ment.
, .
3, 5, 9,13.. Child 13 years, tuberculosis of bone, leg
in a cast; all children, scarlet fever
and diphtheria.
1, 4, 9,11, Child 4 years, rheumatism.
13.
Child 8 years, diphtheria.
8 ,1 0 ...
1,5 ,7,1 0.. Father, operation for rupture; child 1
year, diphtheria and mumps.
5,8,10,11, Mother, colds and backache; children
11 and 13 years, diphtheria.
13,14.
2, 4.......... , Child 2 years, infantile paralysis; child,
age n. r. died, stomacn trouble.
2, 6, 9,12. . Mother, “ rim down” ; child 9 years,
mumps.
3, 7, 8, 10, Father, rheumatism; mother, miscar­
riage, nervousness.
12,13.

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED,
D e tailed T a b le E . —

Sched­
ule
No.

242

Duration of
unem­
ployment.

9 mos. 9 d a s.. .

F a m i l i e s r e p o r t i n g i l l n e s s d u r i n g th e p e r i o d o f t h e f a t h e r ’s u n e m p l o y m e n t — Continued.

Average Employ­
monthly ment of Num
resources mother.
ber Age of each
during
of
child
unem­ Away
chil­
(years).
ploy­
At
dren.
ment. from home
home
n. r.

244

lOmos.lOdas..

n. r.

1 yr. 7 mos. 12
'das.
6 mos. 23 d a s..

$53.70

V

v

41.10

V

V

10 mos. 20 das..
1 yr. 1 mo. 27
das.
1 yr. 4 mos. 6
das.

n. r.
84.99

254
259
262
263
264
265

2 yrs. 1 mo. 6
das.
1 yr. 4 mos. 6
das.
1 yr. n. r. mos.
— das.

n. r.

V

n. r.

V

4, 8,10,12. Father, nervous indigestion “ attacks” ;
mother, two operations; child 12
years, pneumonia.
5 3 mos., 1, Father, auto accident; mother, con­
3, 5, 6.
finement; child 1 year, grippe.
2 7,11.......... Mother, breakdown on account of hard
work and worry.
2 7, 9............ Father, breakdown; mother,, nervous,
operation; child 9 years, operation.
4 7,11,12,16 Mother, operation.
5 3' 5/7, 12, Child 14 years, infected tonsils; child
14.
12 years, heart trouble.
5 11 mos., 1, Father, blood poisoning; mother, con­
3,7,14.
finement; child 3 years, eye ana face
cut; child 1 year, hand crushed.
2 1, 2........
Child 2 years, spinal trouble.

n. r.

/

2

n. r.

V

4

n. r.

V

3

266

8 mos. 9 das__

271

1 yr. 10 das___

n. r.

1/

2

272

1 yr. 7 mos. 6
das.

n. r.

V

4

273
274

6 mos. 23 d a s..

8 mos. 8 d a s ...

46.14
n. r.

V

4
3

277

4 mos...............

278

291

1 yr. 1 mo. 29
das.
1 yr. 2 mos. 24
das.
9 mos. 19 d a s..

295

6 mos. 13 d a s..

300

1 yr. 1 mo. 15
das.
1 yr. 3 mos. 18
das.
1 yr. 2 mos. —
das.

288

301
310

2
85.93

4

n. r.

7
2
f/

n. r.
n. r.

V

7
6
2

V

n. r.

4

313

6 mos. 20 d a s..

n. r.

316
324

8 mos. 23 d a s..
1 yr. 1 mo. 18
das.

n. r.

326

1 yr. 2 mos. 21
das.

n. r.

331
333
334

46.53
n. r.
78.28

3
2
2

335

1 yr. 22 das___
6 mos. 28 d a s..
1 yr. 1 mo. 22
das.
9 mos. 25 d a s..

50.86

3

336

9 mos. 25 das...

101.69

4

337

10 mos. 25 das.

n. r.

5


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Illness reported by family.

4

V

246
252

91

5

V

4
4
V

5

7 mos., 2 .. Mother, confinement; child 2 years,
tonsillitis.
2, 7, 9, 15.. Mother, nervous trouble; child 7 years,
ptomaine poisoning; child 9 years,
stomach trouble.
8,1 0,12 ... Mother, worn out; child 8 years, eye
trouble; children 10 and 12 years,
undernourished.
3, 5........
Child 5 years, tonsillectomy and colds;
child 3 vears, colds.
3, 6,12, 13. Mother, “ run down” ; child 12 years,
anaemic; child 13 years, gland opera­
tion.
6, 9,10, 13. Mother, grippe and general breakdown.
1, 4, 5 .. .
Mother, ear trouble; children 4 and 5
years, ear trouble; child 4 years,
teeth infected; child 5 years, tonsil­
lectomy.
Mother, confinement; child 2 years,
pneumonia and convulsions.
1, 4, 5, 8.
Mother, pregnant; children 1, 5, 8
years, chicken pox.
4, 7, 8,12, All children had influenza.
13,16,17.
1,12...
Mother, grippe; child 12 years, tonsil­
lectomy.
2, 5, 7, 9 Father and children 9 and Id years,
'lO' 12,14
influenza; child 5 years, burned arm
severely.
5, 7, 9, 12, Mother, operation for cancer.
15,17.
10,15......... Mother, ill; child 15 years, in hospital.
7, 9, 12,14. Father, rheumatism (can not work
regularly); child 14 years, operation
on head.
9,12,13,15, Child 12 years, has been ill, in open-air
16.
school now; child 15 years, not well.
3, 5,8,11.. Father, penumonia.
6, 9,10, 13 Mother, neuritis; child 6 years, cold;
children 9 and 13 years, tonsils and
adenoids removed.
3,5,7,9,10. Mother, run down because of overwork;
child 7 years, tonsillitis; child 9 years,
tuberculosis of the hip.
3, 5 ,8 ...
Child 3 years, pneumonia.
7' l6...
Child 7 years, intestinal trouble.
Mother, confinement, pregnant again;
child 1 year, mumps.
7,14,16.. Mother, threatened with tuberculosis;
child 7 years, diphtheria and cold;
child 16 years, cold.
4,6,8,10
Child 4 years, pneumonia; child 6 years
tonsils removed, kidney trouble.
6, 8,11,14, Mother, heart trouble; child 11 years,
15.
pain in side due to fall; child 14 years,
results of being struck by auto.

92

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

D e t ailed T ab le E .—

Schedule
No.

Duration of
unem­
ployment.

F a m i l i e s r e p o r t i n g i l l n e s s d u r i n g th e p e r i o d o f t h e f a t h e r s u n e m ­
p l o y m e n t — Continued.

Employ­
Average
ment of
monthly mother. Num­
ber Age of each
resources
child
of
during
(years).
chil­
unem- Away
dren.
At
p a y ­ from
ment. home. some.
n. r.

4

345

lyr.3m os.lda.

346

lyear.5m os.3
das.

106.20

6

347

1 yr. 2 mos. 6
das.

111.94

8

351

1 yr. 1 mos. 6
das.

354

1 yr. 6 mos. 9
das.

n. r.

6

358

2yrs. 8 das----

65.76

3

361

7 mos. 12 das..

62.70

2

365

1 yr. 2 mos. 16
das.

205.03

2

366

2 yrs. 29 das..

n. r.

V

367

1 mo. 29 das__

n. r.

V

V

5

2

2

Illness reported by family.

6,9,15,16.. Father, appendicitis; mother, “ run
down” ; children 6 and 9 years, ton­
sils removed; child 16 years threat­
ened with tuberculosis.
2 das., 2,4, Mother, confinement; child 4 years,
tonsillitis; child 7 years, nasal diph­
6, 7, 10.
theria.
2, 4, 6, 8, Father, strained back; child 2 years,
pneumonia; child 13 years, crippled
11,13,15,
from infantile paralysis; child 15
16.
years, appendicitis; child 16 years,
blind in one eye.
4, 6, 8, 11, Father, ulcers of the stomach; mother,
pregnant; child 12 years, kidney
12.
trouble.
2, 4, 6, 8, Father, grippe; mother, abscess under
arm, grippe; children 2, 4, 6, 8, 13
13,15.
years, grippe; child 18 years, pneu­
monia.
4, 7, 8 . . . . Mother, “ not strong” ; child 4 years,
boils, tonsils removed.
4, 7.......... Child 4 years, diphtheria; child 7 years,
heart trouble.
9,15........ Father, malaria; mother, Bright’s dis­
ease (died); child 15 years, nervous­
ness and leakage of heart.
1, 7.......... Father, effects of being gassed in war;
mother, weak and nervous; child 1
year, undernourished; child 7 years,
undernourished and needs glasses.
4, 10........ Mother, confinement (child died).

1

Families handicapped by illness.

The many factors interrelated with illness in the families of un­
employed men— whether as cause, effect, or merely occurring coincidently— are best shown in illustrations such as the following.
The father of five children, ranging in age from 1 to 11 years, was
born in England 35 years ago, has been in America 19 yearn and has
taken out his citizenship papers. The mother is American born.
They live in a respectable residential section of the city. The house
needs painting, but otherwise is in good repair; it has furnace heat
and gas. It is well furnished. There is a yard of good size in the
rear.
The father was a machinist in a shoe factory and earned about
$140 a month. In June, 1921, he injured his hand with a needle;
blood poisoning set in, and when he was well several weeks later he
could not get work. Since then he has earned only $30 at irregular
work. Besides the father’s accident the family has had a great deal
of illness and misfortune. Last September the 3-year-old girl lost
the sight of one eye as the result of a fall. The whole family has
just come out of six weeks’ quarantine for scarlet fever. The father
had temporary work at the time the children were taken ill and had

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

T H E F A M IL IE S OF T H E

UNEM PLOYED.

93

to give up his job. The mother is pregnant and expects confinement
in February, and is feeling so miserable that she has to spend most
of her time in bed. The mother says every time the children go out
they contract colds, and she attributes this to undernourishment.
They have never had much sickness in the family before.
The mother would like to give the children milk but can not afford
it. She used to buy 2 quarts daily but now buys none, and the chil­
dren are not given milk at school. The family has eaten more bread
and sirup the last six months than ever before— to make up for the
lack of other things. The mother says they have had no new clothes,
but that she has done her best to make over everything in the house.
She has even taken her last petticoat to make a dress for the oldest
girl; she does not need it, as she spends most of her time in bed.
The family is deeply in debt. They owe one doctor a bill of $60,
and the specialist who operated on the little girl’s eye, $150; also
$80 to a grocer, and a large amount to the city for rent and groceries.
They have had to drop all their insurance policies— $1,500 for the
father, $350 for the mother, and small industrial policies costing 10
cents a month for the children.
A young Irish couple has been unable to keep up the payments on
the insurance policies which both had been carrying, and this has
meant the loss of a large part of the $141.44 already paid in. During
the year’s unemployment of the father, they have also gone into
debt for food and medical attendance to the amount of $88. The
father has secured temporary jobs amounting to something over
two months’ time, and the mother for six months sewed in the alter­
ation room of a department store, earning $15 weekly. The two
little girls of 5 and 3 years were left in the care of the father when he
was at home, and at other times with a neighbor. The mother is
not now working, and the $12 a week which the father, is earning
at city work represents the entire income. The elder child has had
her tonsils removed during the year, and both children have suffered
much with colds. Not able to afford coal to heat all of their fourroom apartment, the family is living in the kitchen and one bedroom.
The children are drinking large quantities of tea, because the parents
can not afford to buy milk.
In a Slavic family consisting of a father, two sons of 10 and 16,
and two daughters of 14 and 18 years, the mother died nine months
ago, after a lingering illness. The father is a blacksmith’s helper
and had been a steady worker, the mother had been economical,
and the family had managed to save $1,200 b y the time the father
lost his job. During the 14 months he has been out of work he has
earned just $88.90. The 16-year-old boy earned $30 on a farm last
summer, the oldest girl worked two weeks making about $7.50 a


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

94

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

week, and the rent of the second floor had brought them $180, mak­
ing a total of $313 since the period of unemployment began. The
doctor came every day during the last two or three months of the
mother’s illness, charging $3 a visit. This bill has all been paid
except $15 or $20, and also the funeral expenses, which came to
$500. These bills, plus expenditures for food and clothing, have
eaten up every cent of their savings.
The 18-year-old daughter has been keeping house since her mother’s
death. Just two weeks before the agent’s visit she had obtained
work in a shirt factory, to earn money enough for clothes for her­
self. The house seemed beautifully kept, but the father thought
it was too hard for her to work and to keep house too.
The 16-year-old boy has finished the eighth grade and is now
going to a business college. It means a real sacrifice for the family,
for it costs $150 a year, but the father will not let him stop. He
says that if the boy has an education he can get a job anywhere,
and he will be able to help him— the father— in later years; but if he
doesn’t get an education he will never be able to get along in life.
The father is very much interested in helping his children to get
ahead and become respected citizens. The rent from the second
floor is being used for the boy’s schooling.
A team driver lost his place in the late summer of 1921 because of
lack of work. There are seven children in the family, about two
years apart, the youngest a child not a month old and the oldest
13 years of age. The father is rapidly losing his eyesight. The
city had given him employment for three weeks, and then laid him
off because he could not see well enough to perform even the unskilled
job of a laborer. This family of nine is living in four undesirable
rooms, almost unfurnished; rags were stuffed in the broken windows.
Living in an apartment of four rooms on the first floor of a twostory frame house is a family of eight. The father is a native-born
American, 31 years of age, the mother a frail-looking woman of 30,
a Hollander. Of the six children the youngest are twin girls 3
months old and the oldest is a boy of 7. The house is in a fairly good
residence neighborhood, and is comfortably furnished. A large
basket of clothes stands ready to be ironed. The home and the
babies are kept spotlessly clean, for the mother says “ I just have to
have things clean even though it takes all m y strength.”
When working the father earned about $130 a month as a core
maker, but because his family was large he could save very little.
Consequently, less than a month after he lost his job he was forced
to ask aid from the relief society. He has now been out of steady
work about a year, during which time he has worked very irregularly
on a bridge that is under construction. He has a horror of debt, so

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

THE FAMILIES OF THE UNEMPLOYED.

95

with the exception of a $57 grocery bill, which the family was obliged
to run last summer when he could find nothing whatever to do, he
has paid cash for everything, going without whenever there is no
money on hand. The mother says they live on bread, jam, and
potatoes most of the tiine. The children often go to their grand­
mother’s across the street, because there is nothing in the house to
eat. The mother is grateful for the help already given. For two
months after the twins were born a class of young girls at the church
sent 2 quarts of milk a day, but now the family is taking only a
pint or two and the mother adds hot water to make it enough for
the children’s oatmeal.
The mother’s pregnancy has complicated the situation, for during
the months when she specially needed good food, rest, and freedom
from worry she was forced to work very hard under a severe nervous
strain and with little to eat. Just prior to her confinement in October
she broke down completely from undernourishment and worry, and
after the twins were bom she was weak and nervous and generally
wretched. The other grandmother has taken the 4-year-old girl
home with her to Michigan because the mother is not well enough
to care for so many children.
The family had paid $50 on a lot they were buying, but were
forced to sell for $20 because they were unable to keep up the pay­
ments. The father has also had to give up his membership and
insurance in a lodge to which he had belonged since he was a boy.
The grocery bill and a doctor’s bill of between $75 and $100 are
worrying the family considerably.
In another family the father had tried to do city work for two weeks
but had broken down because he was not used to outdoor labor.
There were three children— 1, 5, and 8 years of age. The pregnant
mother had to stop her work, and the family was at the end of its
resources when the 8-year-old son was run over by an automobile.
The owner of the car offered to pay the parents $125 to settle the
case out of court and thereby relieve himself of all further responsi­
bility in the matter. The parents were more than willing to accept
the money. The boy’s front teeth were knocked out, and two teeth
had been driven into his jaw, causing great pain. His collar bone
also was broken. He was attended by the family doctor because he
was “ cheaper than down-town doctors.” He charged only $15, and
the mother explained that they were “ $110 clear” on the boy’s
accident. The $110 was used immediately for family living expenses.
The injured boy was unable to eat solid food on account of the
condition of his mouth. His mother said he cried from hunger, but
she could afford to buy him very little of the two things that he could
eat with any degree of comfort—milk and eggs; he finally had to


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

96

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

eat food that hurt his mouth. He has “ picked up a little,” hut the
school has sent home word that he is still 10 pounds under weight.
The “ $110 clear” tided the family over a few weeks until the father
began to get a little mopey from odd jobs.
In order that her children might look as well in school and at work
as the other children of the neighborhood, one mother has not hesi­
tated to add to her other heavy tasks the making of clothing for all
seven of them, even their stockings, and hats for the girls. There
were five girls, 7, 8, 13, 16, and 17 years of age, and two boys, 4 and
12 years of age. An uncle lives with the family as a boarder. The
eldest girl is working, and the second helps an aunt most of the time
when she is not in school, so the mother does all the work necessary
in a household of 10 persons. Her burdens were still further increased
when the children all had the influenza during the first winter after
the father lost his steady employment. Perhaps the family epidemic
of influenza may be partly accounted for by the fact that during
that winter less than a ton of coal was used, oil stoves serving, on
occasion, to heat their eight-room home. They had been making
payments on this house for five years, but after the father lost his
work it became very difficult to meet taxes and interest. Last year
the uncle helped, but this year the mother feels there will be no way
of meeting the $88 tax bill which will fall due in a few days.
A Russian-Polish family .has been living in the same house for seven
years. They have been buying it by monthly payments which
include interest and a small amount of the principal. They occupy
the lower part of the house and receive $18 a month for the second
floor. The father, a man of 37 years, can speak English but can
not read. Although he has been in the United States since he was
21 and has lived in this city for the last 12 years he has never applied
for citizenship papers. He and his wife have been industrious and
thrifty, for in addition to the payments on the house they had saved
$1,000, although there are six children from 1 to 12 years of age.
The works in which the father was employed as a molder were
shut down a little over a year ago. With their savings, the rent
the family received from their tenants, and the father’s earnings at
temporary work (though this has amounted to less than $300 in the
year), it would seem as if the condition of this family should not
have been desperate. But the mother was ill and had to have an
operation, and during the nine months of her illness all of the $1,000
was absorbed in paying the hospital and doctors and druggists, leaving
a bill of $38 still unpaid. So the family, almost wholly deprived of
the mother’s services and care, began to acquire debts— for payments
on the house, insurance, food, gas, a cash loan of $150, and the
medical attendance mentioned— until they now owe $474.32, and
their savings of years are gone.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

UNEM PLOYM ENT

AND

TH E

RELIEF PR O BLEM

IN RACIN E.

The preceding discussion15 of the charitable aid given the families
selected for visiting shows that over one-half of them had been forced
to apply for assistance from public or private relief agencies. More
than two-thirds of those who asked for aid did so within half a year
after the father was thrown out of work; more than a third of them
reached this extremity within three months. It is believed that the
mformation secured from the families visited in the two cities pre­
sents a much more just picture of the relation between unemploy­
ment and dependency upon relief than can be formed through the
records of relief societies since these relate only to groups of
dependents. It was, however, deemed of interest to this study to
secure information concerning the relief problem, through study of
the cases dealt with by public and private relief agencies, those
especially in which unemployment was given as the reason for need­
ing aid.
The main relief agencies in Racine were the Central Association,
a privately supported organization cooperating with the public
agencies and the city poor department. There was also a county
poor agent, who gave aid to families having no legal residence in the
county, and also to transients. Because of the unusual need, in
April, 1921, the city appropriated $50,000 for the relief of the fami­
lies of the unemployed. This aid was given through the existing
relief agencies.
THE CITY COM M ISSARY.

The city commissary was established in October, 1921. The fund
for the commissary was taken from the unexpended balance of the
$50,000 appropriated in April, $20,000 being added to this amount
in January, 1922. One large manufacturing concern had been
helping their former employees who needed assistance, through
granting them grocery orders as loans. This company donated the
use of quarters for the city commissary, and provided light and heat.
In turn, they were allowed the use of the city commissiary for their
families, reimbursing the city fund monthly.
The supplies were given in the form of loans, except that in cases
in which repayment seemed impossible free aid might be given. To
apply for credit at the commissary the unemployed man had to come
to the office of the Central Association or of the city superintendent
of the poor. Unless the family was already known, the application
16See pp. 79 to 84.

97


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

98

was investigated. Wlien it had been approved, the father signed a
promissory note to repay the debt at the rate of $3 each pay day after
he secured employment. He was then given an order on the com­
missary, and checked the articles he desired on a list of staple articles
of food and household supplies. The provisions could not be secured
until the following day, since a copy of the order had to be sent to
the city comptroller, who forwarded it to the commissary. The
agencies received from the city comptroller monthly statements for
each of the families to whom they had given orders so that a family
could at any time find out the amount of its debt. A ledger account
for each family was kept at the office of the city comptroller.
Only one order could be secured by a family in a week. The list
from which selection was made specified the following items, with
limitations as to quantities:
\ bushel potatoes.
2 pounds butterine.
2 pounds lard.
J pound peanut butter.
1 pound coffee.
\ pound cocoa.
1 pound rice.
1 pound beans.
1 pound spaghetti.
3 pounds sugar.
3 pounds boiling beef.
1 pound salt pork.
1 can sirup.
1 pound cheese.
1 dozen eggs.
1 can tomatoes.
1 can peas.
2 cans condensed milk.
1 can evaporated milk.
Vinegar.

2 pounds onions.
3 pounds carrots.
3 pounds rutabagas.
3 pounds cabbage.
2 pounds oatmeal.
2 pounds commeal.
2 cakes yeast.
\ pound barley.
£ sack wheat flour.
i sack rye flour.
1 pound prunes.
1 pound dried apples.
1 pound jelly.
1 package pepper.
5 pounds salt.
1 can mazola.
1 package postum.
1 pound tea.
1 pound crackers.
Oranges.

Soap and other supplies for washing also could be ordered.
An important item was the issuing of books of milk tickets as a
part of the orders for provisions. The commissary list did not specify
the number of such books that could be secured. Each book con­
tained a dollar’s worth of tickets for 11 quarts of milk.
The following list shows the amount of credit given families of
unemployed men through the city commissary during the first three
months of its operation:
Amount of loans to
January 21,1922

Total.......
Less than $5___
$5, less than $10


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Number of families
aided in 3 months.

................... 308
40
63

99

UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE RELIEF PROBLEM IN RACINE.
Amount of loans to
January 21,1922.

Number of families
aided in 3 months.

$15, less than $20.
$20, less than $30
$30, less than $40.
$40, less than $50.
$50, less than $60.
$60, less than $70.
$70, less than $80.

....................

34

.................

59

....................

33

................
................
......
................

21
11
6
2

The total amount of the credit or aid given during the three months
was $6,282.63, averaging $20.40 per family.
RELIEF W O RK AND LOANS BY FACTORIES.

One of the largest concerns in Racine— an implement works—
employed in normal times between 4,000 and 5,000 men. Early in
January, 1922, it had only about 700 men working.
Previous to the establishment of the city commissary this com­
pany gave their former employees orders on local grocers. These
were in the form of loans, the men signing a promissory note to
repay the amount at the rate of $3 each pay day when they had
regular employment. It was stated that if the company found that
a man could not pay back at this rate, he would be allowed to pay
according to his ability. The only requirement for eligibility to these
loans was that the man must have been a former employee in good
standing. In all except emergency cases, investigation was made
before the loan was granted. With the establishment of the city
commissary, arrangements were made to give orders on the com­
missary for groceries, coal, and underwear, on promissory notes as
before. Books of milk tickets were also issued. Each month the
company reimbursed the city for the cost of the articles withdrawn.
This company collected food prices for each month, and made up
budgets, estimated according to the prevailing prices for the month,
on which they based their relief work. Information as to the quanti­
ties of food and household supplies needed was. obtained from the
families of the employees.16 Medical care was given to families by
the company doctor. A small number of men had been placed at
outside work through the factory’s employment office. During the
year 1921, about 300 families of former employees were aided with
credit for groceries and other necessaries.
Another large manufacturing plant granted similar loans to men
who had been in the employ of the company for at least six months,
and who had not quit of their own accord or been discharged. The
procedure here was for the man to apply to the welfare worker for
each order, signing an agreement with the company to repay the loan
at the rate of $3 each pay day when he should be taken back to work
permanently. Groceries and fuel were obtained in this manner. A
16 See details of budget, p. 37.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

100

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

grocery order for a certain amount would be given, to be filled by
grocers with whom the company had made agreements for trade.
The needs of each family were considered in granting the orders, the
family being permitted to select the food. The welfare worker
checked up on the items as the bills came in from the stores, and she
frequently taught the families how to buy and cook economically*
This company did a great deal for their families at Christmas time,
sending them food, toys, and Christmas trees. Old clothing was
collected and given to those who needed it. The families who
received loans from the company were not supposed to receive aid
from the public or private relief agencies. Up to the middle of
January, 1922, 63 families of former employees had been aided by
loans, and 52 had been given clothing.
THE CITY PO O R OFFICE.

The city superintendent of the poor reported 17 that there had been
four times as much need for city aid during the year 1921— the
unemployment period— as there had been in the preceding year.
In 1920 a total of 84 cases were recorded on the city’s books, as
against 336 for the year 1921. The 1920 cases included 120 adults
and 146 children; in 1921 the numbers were 622 adults and 963
children. It was impossible to secure figures in regard to the number
of families aided in each of these years but the comparative number
of children reported would seem to indicate that approximately six
times as many families with children were given aid during the
unemployment year as during the preceding year.
The office of the superintendent of the poor formerly gave grocery
orders on local stores, but after the establishment of the city com­
missary all orders were filled through it. In 1921 the expenditures
for groceries totaled $17,303.21 as compared with $2,952.25 for the
preceding year; the rent item ($5,792.60) was almost six times as
large as for 1920. Other expenditures were: Fuel, $2,169.14; shoes,
$544.55; burials, $290.50; caring for sick in homes, $457.78; caring
for sick in hospitals, $1,385.65; miscellaneous, $392.77. The total
expended for aid during the year was $28,472.50, exclusive of salaries
and other expenses of conducting the office. The monthly totals
show a definite increase as the unemployment period continued,
ranging from $787.60 in January to more than $3,000 in May and
June, there being a slight decrease in the last two months of the year.
THE PRIVATE RELIEF AGENCY.

The largest private relief society in Racine was called the Central
Association. In addition to a relief department this organization
conducted a day nursery, an employment agency (mainly for women
17Racine Journal-News, December 31,1921.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE BELIEF PROBLEM IN RACINE.

101

doing work by the day), and a “ Big Sister” department which
worked with girls. At the time this study was made the staff of the
relief or “ family department” included in addition to the superin­
tendent who was in charge of all branches of the work of the asso­
ciation, a visiting housekeeper who also passed upon the recommen­
dations of the visitors in regard to aid to be given; one visitor who
did all the investigation and supervision work with families other
than unemployment cases; three visitors— two paid and one full­
time volunteer— who devoted all their time to work with unemploy­
ment cases; and an office staff consisting of one interviewer, one file
clerk, and one bookkeeper.
R elief to fam ilies o f unemployed m en.

On January 27, 1921, the Central Association was allotted a special
fund of $25,651.07 from the community “ war chest.” This fund
was disbursed during the four months from February to May,
inclusive.
When relief was applied for, if unemployment was not a factor in
the situation, the family was given aid from the regular fund of the
association. When unemployment was the occasion for the need,
the aid was given from the special city fund, through orders on the
city commissary, a promissory note for the amount being signed by
the applicant. Previous to the establishment of the commissary in
October, 1921, books of milk tickets were given out as relief, and
“ unemployment” families, whenever possible, were given orders on
the grocer who had already allowed them credit but refused to extend
it further. The association did not grant grocery orders to families
until their credit was entirely exhausted, although it might help with
fuel and clothing.
When an order for coal was allowed a family, a promissory note
was signed by the applicant. The association had paid rent in a few
extreme cases, but refrained from doing so as much as possible.
Rents paid by it were always in advance. Occasionally a landlord
was an applicant for aid, and the association aided him by paying the
rent for his tenant. The association reported that it had given out
at least 1,000 new garments, 5,000 articles of old clothing during
1921, and 200 layettes. It had also issued orders on local shoe stores
for 114 pairs of shoes which were donated by a shoe-manufacturing
company. Prescriptions were allowed to all sick people. If the
family was one receiving commissary orders, the city doctor was
called, the medicine or anything else ordered by the doctor was fur­
nished to the family. Confinement cases were sometimes given free
care by the city health department.
Between the latter part of October, 1921, when the commissary
was established, and January 7, 1922, 852 commissary orders were


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

102

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

issued by the association to 352 persons. About 20 of these were
single men to whom meal tickets were issued; the remainder repre­
sented families of unemployed men. It was estimated that about
75 per cent of the men applying for aid because of unemployment
were totally unemployed; 25 per cent were partially employed, earn­
ing from $12 to $15 a week, which was not enough to support their
families. Frequently the families of men who had some work man­
aged to buy food, and the association furnished them with clothing
and other necessities. Many of the men had earned 50 cents now
and then, with which they had paid their gas and light bills. About
a fourth of the families had their gas and light shut off because of
nonpayment, and many families were burning kerosene for lighting
because they could get this on their commissary orders.
Increase in the relief problem.

The annual report of the Central Association for the year November
1, 1920, to November 1, 1921, states that the society aided 2,027
families during the year, 1,642 of whom came to their attention
because of the widespread unemployment. Thus, the relief problem
dealt with by this society was increased to over five times its usual
proportions.
The total amount of relief given through the association during
the year was $30,938.36, which included the $25,651.07 from the
“ war chest” fund, which was used, as noted above, during the period
extending from the 1st of February through the month of May, 1922.
A comparison of the amount expended for relief during this year of
serious industrial depression, with the amounts for the four preceding
years is shown by the following figures:
July 1, 1916, to June 30, 1917.................................... ........................

$718.41

July 1 ,1 9 1 7 , to June 3 0 ,1 9 1 8 ...................................... ......................

1 ,4 5 0 .1 9

July 1, 1918, to June 30, 1919......................... ...................................

2 ,125. 60

July 1, 1919, to June 30, 1920 18........................................................

2,91 7 . 77

N ov. 1, 1920, to Oct. 31, 1921............................................................. 19 30,938. 36

Comparative data in regard to the number of families aided were
secured for four years, as follows:
Families aided.

July 1 ,1 9 1 7 , to June 30, 1918..............................................

391

July 1, 1918, to June 3 0 ,1 9 1 9 .....................................

387

N ov. 1 ,1 9 1 9 , to Oct. 3 1 ,1 9 2 0 ................................................................

441

N ov. 1, 1920, to Oct. 31, 1921.......................................................................... 2,02 7

The above figures show that five times as many families were given
aid during the unemployment period as the average during the pre­
ceding years, and that the average amount of relief for each family
during the unemployment period was about three times as much as
in preceding years.
18 Change in fiscal year. Amount of relief given from July 1, 1920, to Oct. 31, 1920, was $610.53.
18Includes $25,651.07 from “ war chest.”


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D T H E R E L IE F P R O B L E M I N R A C IN E .

103

FAMILIES GIVEN AID BECAUSE OF UNEMPLOYMENT.

Th.0 November, 1921, records of the private relief agency were
examined and a cross section study was made of all the families that
applied for aid apparently because of the father’s unemployment.
The total number of such families applying during the month was
179.
The 179 fathers had been employed in 32 different establishments,
mainly foundries or factories where farm implements, electrical sup­
plies, automobiles, or rubber' products were made.
Duration o f unemployment before applying for aid.

More than three-fourths of the families (138) were new to the
agency and had applied for aid for the first time during this unem­
ployment period. Of these, 54 per cent applied for charitable aid
within three months of the tune the father was thrown out of work.
Of the total 179 families, one-seventh required assistance within a
month of the time when the father lost his job. The following list
shows these facts in more detail for the families for whom the time
was reported, according to whether the family applied for aid for the
first time during this unemployment period or was previously known
to the society:
Period before application for aid.
Total............................

•

New cases
. receiving
aid.

Old cases
receiving
aid.
OA

Less than 1 m on th.........................

Q

1 -3 months....................................

in
Q

4 -5 months.................... ...........
6 months and over............................

3

Nativity and residence o f fathers.

The greatest contrast appears between the nativity of the fathers
of this group and that of the white males 21 years of age and over in
the general population of the city. Of the former, 28 per cent were
native and 72 per cent foreign born; the corresponding percentages
for the general population were 56 and 44.
Only 5 per cent of the 179 fathers were known to have lived in the
city during their entire lives, another 5 per cent had lived there for
20 years or longer. None of the families had come to the city within
a year, but more than half had been residents for less than 10 years.
Length of father’s residence in city.

Per cent distribution.

Total.................................................. -v....................... ..........
L i f e . . ............................................... .............................. ..........................| ...............
20 years and over.......................................................................................................
15-19 years........................................ .... _ ................ ...................................
10-14 years____•........................
6 -9 years..... .................................................
1-45 years...........................................................
4 9 0 9 0 °— 23------- 8


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

100
5
g

13
25

23
29

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

104

Children in fam ilies given aid.

In 176 of these families there were 595 children under 18 years of
age.20 The following list gives the number of children in each family:
Number of children in family.

Number of families
reporting.

T otal....................................................... ........................................................... 176

1 .......................................................................................... ............................................

22

2 . . . . . . .................

35

3 .............................

46

4 . ................................................................................./. .......... .................................

34

5

22

.....................................

6 ............................. .................................................. ........................... - ....................

7

7

5

....... , ...........................................................................................................................

8 ....
9

................, ..................................................................................................................

3
2

There were more families with three children than with any other
number, and the families with one, two, or three children formed 59
per cent of the totalAbout one-tenth of the children were under 1 year of age. These
families showed a preponderance of children under 7 years of age—
56 per cent as compared with the 45 per cent in the general popula­
tion. The percentages of children from 14 to 17 years of age in­
clusive were 9 in the group applying to the association and 10 in the
general population.
Number of children in
Ages of children.
families reporting.
T otal...... ............................................................................................................ 595
Under 1 year.

59

1 -6 years____

271

7-1 3 years—

211

14-15 y e a r s ..

36

16-17 y e a r s ..

15

Not reported.

3

Employment of children.

Only 40 families had children 14 years of age or over. Of the 51
children of working age, only 13, in the same number of families,
were working during the time aid was given. Thus, in more than
two-thirds of these families, children who might have been em­
ployed were presumably unable to find work or were not eligible for
working permits because they had not completed the required
schooling.
Illness in the fam ilies.

Of the 179 families, 106 (59 per cent) were reported as having
had some serious illness during the period of the father’s unemploy­
ment. The details in regard to the members of the families who
were ill are as follows:
2« For three families the number and ages of the children were not reported.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

105

UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE RELIEF PROBLEM IN RACINE.
Members of families having illness.
T otal.................................

Number of families
having illness.
.......................106

Father...................................... ......................................................................................

55
10

One or more children...............................................................................................

17

Mother and father.......... ...................... ....................................................................

6
12
2
4

Mother.................. ..

1.................... ..................................................................

Mother and one or more children.......................................................................
Father and one or more children........................................................................
Mother, father, and one or more children.................................................

In 63 families, or more than a third of the entire group, the jnother
was pregnant or confined during the time the father was unemployed.
This disability of the mother, added to her special need for medical
service and other assistance, was undoubtedly the real occasion for
the application for aid in a considerable proportion of these families.
FREE M ILK TO SCHOOL CHILDREN.

In the latter part of 1921, the Women’s Civic League raised a
special fund for furnishing milk to school children. Each school
sent weekly reports to the milk committee of the league, noting the
improvements that appeared to have followed the supplying of
milk in the case of each child. The children received the milk free
or were charged a nominal sum. The teachers decided which
children should have the milk free. It was reported that some
children who had been paying and were no longer able to do so,
frequently discontinued drinking milk because they were too proud
to say that they could not afford to buy it. The following list
shows that 2,131 children in 14 schools of the city (including one
parochial school) were served milk during the week of January 16,
1922, of whom at least 742 (35 per cent) received it free.
Children served Children served milk
School.
milk free.
at nominal charge.
Total................. ................................................................ 21 742
21 1 ,1 0 6
1 - ........................................................................................................
2

70

90

.................................................................................................

122

113

106

104

3

.....

4

....................................................................

5

.........................................................

27 108
32 94

6 ..................................................................
7

........ ............. ................... .......................................................

15
60

..............

...............................................................................................................

22 251

9 . . ....................................................................
10

11 .................................................................................................
12

......................................................

13

.........................................................................

14

.............................................................

ai Total not complete because data not reported from School No. 8.
** The principal and the teachers paid for some of these children.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

60 115
16

28

127

87
85 61
22 55

106

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

On January 1, 1922, it was necessary to raise the price from 2
cents to 3 cents a day for each child; that same week 287 children
discontinued taking it. During the week January 16 to 20, 23,104
half-pints of milk were served to the school children of the city.
CHILDREN BROUGHT TO THE DAY NURSERY.

On January 15, 1922, the day nursery conducted by the Central
Association was caring for 22 children from eight families in which
the mother was working. These represented about half of the total
number of children in the day nursery at that time. The attend­
ance at the jiursery was not constant, because the mothers were
doing work by the day which was not at all regular. In seven of
these eight families the mother had not worked prior to the unem­
ployment of the father. The nursery had previously cared for the
children of five other families in which the father was unemployed.
The reasons given for no longer bringing the children to the nursery
were that the father had secured work and the mother stayed home,
the mother lost her work and was not able to obtain any other, and
in one case the mother died and the children were placed in an
orphanage.
The small number of children brought to the day nursery is
largely explained by the scarcity of employment for women, and
also b y the fact that the unemployed fathers often cared for the
children at home during the mother’s absence. The only day
nursery in the city was inaccessible to many families. One working
mother walked three miles to place her children in the nursery.
The largest numbers of children under care were reported for May
and June, 1920, early in the unemployment period, and again for
August, September, and October, 1921. The total families and
children cared for monthly at this nursery from April, 1920, to
January, 1922, are shown in the following list:
Year and month.
1920:

Families.

A p ril...........

25

M a y ............

24
24

Ju n e............

September.

21
20
21

O c to b e r ....

18

J u ly ........ ..
A u gu st.......

Novem ber.

n

Children.
59
51
62
46
49
45
41
(2 4 )

19

41

F ebru a ry ..

20
21

45

M arch.........

18

44

Decem ber.
1921:
J a n u a r y ...

** Number not reported.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

39

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D T H E E ELIEE P R OBLEM I N R A C IN E .
Year and month.
1921— Continued.

107

Families. Children.

A p ril...............

..

19

44

M a y .................
Ju n e................

..1 9
..
21

42
46

J u l y - ..............
A ugust............

..
..

52
55

19
20

September___

..

28

70

October..........

..

25

58

N o ve m b e r.. .

..

22

52

D ecem ber___

..

15

41

M O T H E R S’ PENSIONS AND UNEMPLOYMENT.

Unemployment was a factor in increasing the number of mothers
applying for and receiving pensions through the juvenile court,
which administered this aid in Racine. In August, 1920, there were
85 widows receiving pensions; on December 14, 1921, the number
had increased to 132. The court reported for the year ending Sep­
tember 30, 1921, that 136 families, with a total of 337 children, had
been aided during the year, the sum expended for this purpose
being $22,696.
Thirty-seven of the women granted pensions during the year had
been widowed for five or more years and had been able to support
themselves up to the time of applying for aid.
Not only did mothers who were employed outside of the home
become dependent through unemployment, but those who were sup­
porting themselves by taking roomers and boarders were deprived
of this source of income because the roomers left or were unable to
pay their rent.
The following are stories illustrative of the cases of mothers to
whom pensions were granted in 1921 because their means of living
were cut off through the general unemployment:
Mother with three children. The father had been dead five years.
Up to the time of application for a pension in February, 1921, the
mother had been able to support herself and the children. She
owned her home, but it carried a $1,200 mortgage. She had previ­
ously been able to rent rooms, but because of the unemployment
situation in the city, she had not for some time been able to get
tenants. The only income she had at the time of application was
rent from the downstairs flat. She was granted a pension of $20
a month.
A mother with two children— aged 7 and 5 years— whose husband
had been dead four years, applied for a pension in October, 1921.
She had supported herself by working outside of the home and by
renting the upper flat of the house which she owned. She had been
“ laid o ff” for some time previous to the application for aid, and the

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

108

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

tenants in the upper 'flat had not been able to pay any rent for five
months because the man was out of work. A pension of $12 a month
was granted.
A mother with three children, who had been earning from $18 to
$22 a week, had been out of work for some time. She was buying
her property, had paid $3,000 on it, but still owed $1,100. She was
given a pension of $20 a month.
Another mother had supported herself and one child by keeping
boarders for the six years since her husband’s death. Because of
unemployment the boarders had left, and she had not been able
to get others or to find outside work for herself. The pension granted
was $15.
No matter how many children a mother had, or what the hard­
ships of her situation, the maximum pension she could receive in
Racine was $40, so the grants were inadequate in many cases. Before
the unemployment period, supplementary aid to mothers receiving
pensions had been given only in exceptional cases by the private
relief society. Such aid had usually consisted only of clothing.
Since the unemployment period began, far greater demand for
supplementary aid in these cases had been made, and orders for
groceries as well as clothing had been granted to a much greater
extent than formerly. The small amount of the grant that could
be made undoubtedly explains why many of the mothers worked
when they could secure employment, instead of applying for mothers ’
pensions.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

FAM ILIES

OF M E N

G IVEN EM E R G E N C Y
SPR IN G FIELD .25

E M P LO YM E N T

IN

An earlier section of this report includes information regarding
the plans for city employment that were put into operation in
Springfield in August, 1922. Applications for the emergency work
furnished by the city street and park departments were made to
the special employment office designated for the purpose by the
mayor. The private relief society cooperated in this enterprise and
made the investigations for the employment office, visiting the
homes of all the men applying for work, and verifying statements in
regard to dependents, resources of the family, and other items
needed in determining whether the applicants should be given city
work. Since it was necessary to give preference to those who stood
in the most immediate need, the work was limited to men with
dependent children or with more than one adult dependent upon
them.
During the first six and a half months of the operation of the
special employment office, 1,017 men were given city work. Of these,
663 were men with dependent children. This last group was thought
to constitute one of special interest in a study of the nature of the
unemployment problem. The facts secured from records of the
investigating office concerning the 663 fathers of dependent children
form the basis for the discussion that follows.
THE

F A T H E R ’ S P R E V IO U S

EMPLOYMENT.

Interval between loss o f employment and application for city work.

Almost one-fifth of the 663 men had applied for city work within
a month after becoming unemployed, and nearly half within three
months. It is evident, however, that some of the longer intervals
shown in the following list may be accounted for by the fact that the
office was not opened until August 1, 1921, when unemployment
had been serious for some months.
Duration of unemployment before
Per cent
applying for city work.
distribution.
T otal...................................................................................................................... 100
Less than 1 m o n th ........................................................................ ...........................

19

1 m onth...........................................................................................................................
2 months.........................................................................................................................

12

3 m onths........... . . . ..................................... ...............................................................

9

16

4 months...................................................

8

5 months...................................................... |...............................................................

5

6 -1 1 m o n t h s .................
12-17 m onths.................................................

25

6

26 See Appendix A, Tables 47 and 48.

109

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

110

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

W eekly wages.

The weekly rates of wages these men had received in their previous
employment were reported as follows:
_ Per cent
Former regular weekly wages.
distribution.
T o ta l.................................................................................................................. 100

$10, less than $15............................................................. .........................................

2

$15, less than $20....................... ...............................................................................

11

$20, less than $25.............................................

29

$25, less than $30.............................. . . .....................................................................

28

$30, less than $35........................................................... - ................. ........................

16

$35 and o v e r .......................................................................................

14

The above figures show that considerably more than half the men
with dependent children who were given city work had received in
their regular employment a weekly wage of $25 or over. It is,
therefore, of interest to find that two-fifths of the men previously
receiving such wages remained unemployed for six months or more
before applying for city work, as against one-fifth of the men who
had earned less than $25. More than half the men in the lower wage
group sought city employment within three months of being thrown
out of work.
Occupations.

For 628 of the men the last regular occupation was entered on the
records. Thirty-three per cent had been in occupations classified as
skilled, 19 per cent were semiskilled workers, and 44 per cent were
laborers. The remaining 4 per cent included retail dealers, clerks,
servants, railroad employees, and others.
Number of
fathers
Previous occupation.
reporting.
Total...............................................................................................................
628
Laborer........................................................................ ....................

273

M achinist........................................................................................
Chauffeur.......................................................................... .............

24

Filer, grinder, polisher............................................. ..

23

Carpenter..........................: . . . . . ..................... ........................#

19

Painter........................................' . ................... ..............................

18

M achine operative......................................................................
Assem bler............................. ................................... ......................

13

M echanic........................................................................................
Toolmaker......................................................................................

9

Drop forger................................................... ............... .................

9

M ason...............................................................................................
M o ld e r ............................................. ..................................... ..

8
8

89

12
9

Inspector...................... .......... ............... .......................................

6

M etal worker................ ...........; ........................................ ..........

6

T in sm ith........................................ ............ ...................................
W eaver.................... ..................................................... .................

6
6

Firem an..................................... ............... .....................................

5

P unch pressman........ ............................................................. ....

5


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

F A M I L I E S OF M E N G IV E N E M E R G E N C Y -W O R K I N S P R IN G F IE L D .

1 11

Number of
Previous occupation.
reporting.
Servant.......................................................................................................................
5
Woodworker.....................................................................................................

4
4

Steam fitter..............................................................................................................

3

Tire m aker................................................................................................................

Shoemaker.........................................................................................

3

Billin g and shipping clerk...............

2

B o x m aker.................................

2
2

Cement finisher.. . .................
Clerk............ ....................... - ...................................................................................

»

2

M illw right................................

2
2
2
2

R ifle tester........................................... 1 ..................................................................

2

Stockkeeper.............................................................................................................

2
2

Core m aker...... .............
F o r e m a n ..............
M achinist’s helper.................................

W eld er.........................................
Other—

.................................................................... . . .........................................
S O C IA L

39

DATA.

Ages o f fathers.

The ages reported for these 663 men at the time of their applica­
tions for city work showed that 89 per cent of them were in the vigor­
ous years of life, between 21 and 50. The largest number (38 per
cent) were between 30 and 40, 26 per cent were between 21 and 30,
and 25 per cent between 40 and 50. A further 10 per cent were be­
tween 50 and 60 years of age, while 14 men were 60 years of age or
over, and 2 were under 21.
Nativity and length o f residence in city.

The foreign bom formed a considerably larger proportion of the
663 men than of the general population of the city— 52 per cent in the
unemployed group as against 36 per cent in the population. Men
born in Italy constituted nearly half of those of foreign birth who
were given city work. Of the remainder no considerable number
came from any one country— 19 countries being represented.
Only 52 of the 663 men were natives of the city; on the other hand,
only 1 per cent had been in the city for less than a year. A total of
53 per cent had been resident there for less than 10 years; 25 per cent
for from 10 to 19 years; and 22 per cent for 20 years or over.
Number and ages o f children.

In two families the ages and the number of children were not
reported. In the other 661 families there were 1,776 children under
18 years of age. More than half of these children were under 7 years
of age. In the general population of the city 45 per cent of the chil­
dren under 18 were under the age of 7 years as compared with 51 per
cent in the unemployed group. Almost two-fifths of the children


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

112

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

were of compulsory school age. One-tenth had reached the minnnuin
legal working age. The age distribution of these children was as
follows:
„Number
. of.
children
under 18
Age of child.
years.
T otal............................................................................................................... h 7 7 6
Under 1 year........................................ - - ..............................................................
1 year........................ ’. . ............................................................................................
2 yeajfs.........................................................

^23

3 years.......................................................................................................- ...............

,

4 years..................................................................... - ........................- ............... ..
115

k

6 years....... . ..............................................................................................................
7 years.................................

X1°

8 years.........................................................................................................................

J tt

9 years....... .......................... ........................................................... ..........................

101

10 years......................................................................................................................
11 years............................................... - .....................................................................
12 years........................................................................................................... ...........
13 years............................................................................* ............................ ...........

74

14 years................................................................................ - - - . ..............................

^

15 years.................. ....................................................................................................
16 years......................... ............................ - .............* » ........................- .................
17 y e a r s ........................................ - .........................................................................

27

Age not rep orted ..................................................................................................

26

Although there were 182 children 14 to 17 years of age, inclusive,
only 17 of them were working. This is a striking indication of the
unemployment situation with respect to children of working age.
Under ordinary circumstances a considerable proportion of these
children would undoubtedly have been compelled to leave school and
go to work when their fathers became unemployed. Probably many
of them had been at work but could no longer secure it. The com­
pensating factor here was, of course, that the unemployed children
under 16 years of age had to remain in or return to school.
Debts.
When the men applied for city work, inquiry was made in regard to
indebtedness. Two-thirds of the families were reported as having
debts ranging from a few dollars to several hundred. The amounts
are shown below:
XT . ,
Number of
Amount of indebtedness.

families
reporting.

T otal........ .............. ........................- .................................................... 663
N o d e b t s ....................................................

222

U nder $ 1 0 . . . ....................................................- ............................................- - - - - -

16

$10, less than $25................................................................... - - -------- - - - - .........
$25, less than $50........................................................................................................

^

$50, less than $75...................................................
$ 75, less than $100.............................. ....................- ................................................

^


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

48

113

F A M IL IE S OF M E N G IV E N E M E R G E N C Y W O R K I N SPR IN G FIE LD .

Amount of indebtedness.
$100, less than $125........ . ....................................................................

Number of
families
reporting.
....
35

$125, less than $150....................................... 1 .......................... ..

....

15

$150, less than $175...............................................................................

....

17

8

$175, less than $200............................ .................................................. .

....

$200, less than $225.............................................................................V

....

$225, less than $250......................................... ...... ..........................

....

1

$250, less than $300...............................................................................

....

5

$300, less than $350................................................................................

....

9

$350, less than $ 4 0 0 ...............................................................................

....

1

$400, less than $450..........................................................................

....

5

$450, less than $500.................................................................................

....

2

$500................................................................................................................

....

$ 7 0 0 ............ .............................................. i ; ..................................... ..

....

1
1

Am ount not reported.............................................................................

....

30

2i

Assistance by public and private agencies.

The data in regard to relief and other assistance given to the families
of this group of unemployed men indicate to some extent the status
of the families, but the figures obtainable unfortunately relate to the
period preceding, as well as during, this time of special stress. It is,
therefore, not possible to relate this information directly to unemploy­
ment conditions.
Almost a fourth of the 663 families had been given some form of
assistance by the private family-relief agency, the city overseers of
the poor, visiting nurses, or other social agencies or institutions. All
but 7 of these 157 families had received charitable aid. Almost half
had been given assistance by more than one agency, while 8 per cent
were known to four or more agencies. One family was reported by
six agencies as having been aided— the private-relief society, the over­
seer of the poor, the Visiting Nurses’ Association, the Society for the
Prevention of Cruelty to Children, a church organization giving relief,
and the State board of charities. There were 7 families each having
one child in an institution— of these children 2 were in a home for
dependent children, 2 were in the State hospital for epileptics, and
1 was in a training school for delinquent children. In 79 families
the Visiting Nurses’ Association had given assistance during illnesses;
all but 23 of these families were known also to other agencies.
Number of agencies aiding each family.
T o ta l.......................................

Number of
families
......... 157

1
.... - - ..............................................................- ..............................................
2 ...................................................................................... - ............................................

39

3

21

.......................................- ........... - ...................... ............................. .............................

85

4 ....................................................................................................... . . . ..........................

7

5 .............................................................................................. . . . . . . . ..........................

2

6- -- ---....................................................................................
7..............................................................................................

2
1


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

114

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Perhaps the most significant fact in connection with this phase of
the problem is that, up to the time of applying for city work, threefourths of the families of the 663 men with dependent children had
not been known to social agencies, either before unemployment or
because of it. The corollary to this in the case of many families may
be found in the preceding paragraphs relating to debts.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

CH ILD LABOR IN AN U N E M P L O Y M E N T P E R IO D .
C H IL D R E N E L IG IB L E F O R W O R K .

In each, of the two cities an effort was made to determine the
effect of the unemployment situation on the continuance of schooling
and on the prevalence of child labor. For this purpose data were
secured from the offices issuing employment certificates to children,
and from the continuation schools attended by working children
within the permit ages.
Under the Wisconsin law no child between the ages of 14 and
17 years may be employed or permitted to work at any gainful occu­
pation other than agriculture or domestic service unless he has se­
cured a working permit authorizing the employment. The grant­
ing of a permit for work is contingent on the child’s completion of
the eighth grade or school attendance for nine years. Children who
have completed the period of compulsory full-time education, but
who have not completed a four-year high-school course and are not
attending a regular day school for at least half-time, must attend a
continuation school, where such schools have been established, for
one-half day of each school day until the end of the term of the school
year m which they become 16, and thereafter they must attend such
a school eight hours a week until the end of the term in which they
become 18. In cities where ^continuation schools are maintained,
children employed in domestic service must also secure working per­
mits and attend the part-time schools.
In Massachusetts no child under 16 years of age, unless physically
or mentally unable to attend school, may secure an employment cer­
tificate until he has completed the sixth grade and is to be employed
for at least 6 hours a day. This law applies to all occupations,
# special forms of permits being issued for work at domestic service
and on farms. All children between the ages of 14 and 16 years thus
excused from full-time school attendance must attend a continuation
school, wherever such a school is established, for 4 hours a week,
and if they become unemployed they must attend for 20 hours a
week, provided the school is in session for that length of time.
EFFECT

ON

C H IL D L A B O R IN

R A C IN E .

In Racine child-labor permits are issued at the office of the con­
tinuation school. This school has been in operation for several
years, and has had an opportunity to enroll all the children who
leave the regular schools to enter employment. The most recent
115

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

116

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

amendment to the law requiring part-time school attendance of
working children extended its application to children under 18 years.
But at the time of the study the law was not being enforced in the
case of children who were 17 years of age before September 1, 1921,
so that the figures in regard to children who had left school to go to
work may be considered as being fairly adequate only for children
under 17 years of age. The enrollment in the part-time school in­
cluded children who had left the regular schools to go to work but
who were unemployed, as well as those who were working. All-day
classes were provided for unemployed children, many of whom,
however, reentered the regular schools.
Children enrolled in continuation school.

It was obvious that the number of children reported in the records
of this school as working at the time of the inquiry was larger than
the number actually at work. The law requires the employer to
return the working permit of a child to the issuing officer within 24
hours of the time that the child leaves his employment. During the
unemployment period this requirement was liberally construed be­
cause the industries that were compelled to cut down their force on
account of slack work hoped to be able in a short time to reemploy
those discharged and for this reason held the permits, interpreting
the situation to mean that there had been a temporary reduction of
force rather than a permanent discharge. For the same reason the
length of unemployment for the children could not be accurately
ascertained from the records of the school or the permit-issuing
officer.
*
It was reported that there had been considerable complaint at
the permit office during the unemployment period because of the
school attendance requirements, some families claiming that they
meant lower wages and interfered with a boy or girl holding a job
at.a time when the father was out of work and it was absolutely
necessary that the child should be allowed to work full time. The
school superintendent had made an effort to secure reliable informal
tion in regard to the families of pupils whose nonattendance had been
attributed to lack of sufficient income because of the unemployment
of parents or of older brothers and sisters, and there had been a ten­
dency toward leniency in such cases. To a certain extent the data
secured from the continuation school relative to working children
would be affected by this, offsetting in some measure the figures in
regard to children who were at work, which apparently included
some who had been laid off, but whose permits had not been returned
to the school.
Another probable weak spot in the statistics on working children is
in connection with the number of girls who were employed at house-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

CHILD LABOR IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT PERIOD.

117

work. The theory was that they should attend the continuation
school, but it appears probable that they were not all registered,
especially if they had not gone to work immediately after leaving the
regular schools.
On December 31, 1921, there were 742 children— 355 boys and 387
girls—enrolled in the Racine continuation school. It was known that
at least 130 of these children— 67 boys and 63 girls— had left the
regular schools and gone to work after November 30, 1920; that is,
during the period of serious industrial depression in that city. The
ages of the children were as follows:
_
,
_
Ages December 31,1921.
B o y s.....................................................

Children enrolled during
unemployment period.
67

14 y e a r s ..

3

15 y e a r s ..

21

16 y e a r s ..

33

17 years 26

10

Girls..................

63

14 years........................... . ....... . . . . . ....................................... ........................ .
15 years............................................
16 years..........................................
17 ye ars 26....... . . . .............................. ........... ....................................................

1
22
37
3

Time elapsed since leaving regular school.
The length of time since leaving the regular school was reported
for 54 per cent (403) of the children. More than two-fifths of these
had left school to go to work between a year and a half and two years
prior to the time of the inquiry. Over one-fourth had left school
within the past year— the period of most serious unemployment.
Time elapsed since leaving school.
distribution.
T otal........................................... ...................................................................... 100
Less th an 6 m on th s
............................. . ........ . . ................... . ........................
6-11 m on th s.......................................... . _ _ . . ............................ ..............................

14

12-17 m onths.............. ...................................; ........ ....................... . ........................
18-23 m onths..............S ........' . ................................................... .. | .......................

3
43

2 4 -3 5 m onths.................. | _ . . . . . . I ® . .

....................................

24

..................................

3

36 months and over...................................... ......... ............

13

Decline in child labor.

The accompanying graph, based on the number of working chil­
dren in the continuation school over a period of eight years, shows
clearly the decline in child labor during the industrial depression. It
also shows the earlier period of abnormal demand for labor, so that
the acute industrial depression really meant— so far as child labor
was concerned— a sudden drop to what had been normal conditions
before the war activities produced the great increase in the number
of employed children.
*6It has been pointed out that the enrollment of boys and girls 17 years of age was incomplete.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

118

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

The following figures, comparing for certain dates the total enroll­
ment in the school with the number of children enrolled in the school
who were actually working, show the sharp decline in jobs available
CH ART HE.

RACINE, WISCONSIN-EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN
NUM BER OF B O V S AN D

G IRLS

ENROLLED IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

■WHO "WERE WORKING ON JUNE FIRST OF EACH Y E A R

to children. It has been noted that children who had left the regular
schools to go to work were required to attend the continuation school
whether or not they were employed, unless they reentered the regular
schools.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C H IL D LA BO R I N

AN

U N E M P L O Y M E N T P E R IO D .

Date.
June, 1914......................

119

Enrollment of children
under 18 years of age.
Total. Working.

June, 1915..................
June, 1916..................

¿75

June, 1917......................

AHQ

June, 1918......................
June, 1919......................

1
Ij 1QJ.
lo 1

Decem ber, 1919..................
June, 1920......................

893

Decem ber, 1920....................

736

June, 1921......................

Q9A

December, 1921..................

364

The decrease in the number of new permits issued during 1921, as
compared with the preceding year, is shown in the following monthly
totals:
Total permits issued...............
January....................
February.................
March.................
April....................
May.........................
June........................
July..................... ............................
August..........................
September.......................
October........................
November.................
December.................

1920.

1921.
172
13
U5
la

19
15
11
1
43
Ifi
TC

8

During 1920 a total of 391 permits were issued to boys and 316 to
girls, and in 1921, 79 were issued to boys and 93 to girls. These fig­
ures represent children leaving school to enter work for the first time.
They give a clear picture of what happened when the industrial de­
pression made it difficult for children to find work j the difference
between the numbers in the two columns shows how many more
children remained in school.
Jobs secured by children during unemployment period.

Because of the great scarcity of work for men the jobs secured by
the children who were still of compulsory-school age are of special
interest. The following were reported as the first occupations of
children who secured their first working permits after November
30, 1920.
49090°—23----9


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

120

U N E M P L O Y M E N T AND

C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Occupation or place of
employment reported.

Total..........

Children beginning work
after Nov. 30,1920.

.............................. 130

B o y s...................... .. - ......... - ...............

67

Office work.......................................... - - ...........

21
18
4
3
3

Tailor shop..........................................................
Shoe-shining or repairing s h o p ..................
W orking for father— plum bing or garage

2
2
2

Clerk and errand boy for stores........ .........
Factory w orker.................................................
Messenger and errand b o y ...........................
Newspaper and printing office...................

Carpenter sh o p ........................................... - - -

1
1

Contractor.................................................

1

C a d d y .............. ....................................... - ...........

Dental-supply com pany...............................
Ice com pany......................................................
Janitor...................................................................
N o t reported.......................................................
Girls................................................................................

1
1
1
6
63

Factory and laundry work........................- ................................ 20
Housemaid (including 1 nursemaid)........................................... 16
•
IQ
Clerk in store............................................................... - ............. J°
Stenographic or other office work................................................
8
Newspaper and printing office..................................
8
Millinery apprentice................. - - • ......................- - - *.............
2
Not reported......................... - .............................. ...... . . . . . . . . .
1

It is, of course, impossible to conjecture as to the probable number
of these jobs that might have been accepted by adults even with the
presumably low rate of pay, in order to tide over the unemployment
period. In a time of such scarcity of work and the suffering entailed
upon, great number of families, it might well be seriously urged that
an even greater proportion of children be permitted to continue their
schooling and many of the jobs be given to men and women who
had spent months in fruitless search for work.
EFFECT ON CH ILD LABOR IN SPRIN GFIELD.27

Employment certificates.

In Springfield several types of employment certificates and permits
are issued by the school-attendance department: (1) Working certifi­
cates for children between 14 and 16 years of age working in Springfield. These children must attend the Springfield continuation
school. (2) Working certificates for children of like ages residing in
Springfield but working in other towns. These children must go to
the continuation school in the town of employment. (3) Permits for
home work for children between 14 and 16 years of age; they, also,
must attend the continuation school. (4) Permits for work out of
37 See Appendix A, Tables 42-46, inclusive.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C H IL D LA BO R IH

AH

121

U H E M P L O Y M E H T P E R IO D .

school hours for children of the same ages. (5) Certificates to minors
between 16 and 21 years of age whom the law requires to attend
evening school; that is, illiterates and persons who have not had the
schooling necessary for securing a regular work permit.
A comparison of the total number of certificates and permits issued
during the year which included the unemployment period, with those
issued during the preceding year, will be of interest.
Type of permit.

Children granted permits.
1920
1921'_

To residents employed in Springfield..........................................

1? 595

To residents of Springfield employed elsew here.....................
H om e perm its.........................................................................................

69

91

64
318

68
202

To nonresidents working in Springfield......................................

846

Child labor before and during the unemployment period.

The best information in regard to the child-labor situation was to be
obtained from the records of the certificate issuing office rather than
from those of the continuation school, which in Springfield was of
comparatively recent origin. The main interest would be in children
between 14 and 16 years of age granted working certificates, who
resided in Springfield, whether or not they were employed there.
Chart V III shows graphically the rise and decline of child labor,
by months, accompanying industrial prosperity and depression.
Chart I X shows the variation in the number of children leaving
school to enter employment, during a period of seven years— 1915
through 1921. This is based on the number of first certificates issued
each year, so that the figures refer to the number of different children,
and not to the number of certificates issued. The figures follow:

Year.

1915.
1916.
1917.
1918.
1919.
1920.
1921.

Children granted
permits for the
first time.
Boys.
Girls.

-.1 5 7
-.
404
..
457
..
479
..
345
..
354
..
102

119
273
303
346
295
276
115

While the decline in numbers of children employed in 1921 is
undoubtedly mainly due to the industrial depression that followed
the maximum attained during the war, when boys and girls could
obtain employment very readily at abnormally high wages, the
numbers were also affected to some extent by the higher educational
qualifications required for securing certificates. This new require­
ment, which went into effect in August, 1921, specified completion of
all studies of the sixth grade, while the previous requirement was
that the children must be able to read and write sufficiently well to
qualify in the sixth grade in this respect.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

122

CHART SHI.

SPRINGFIELD, M ASSACHUSETTS-EM PLOYM ENT OF CHILDREN
Number of children between l+and 16 y e a r s of age Isaving school in Springfield .M a s s a c h u s e tts each "month to engage in
employment, as indicated by initial employment certificates issued,

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C ftlL D LABOR 1ST A i f U N E M P L O Y M E N T PERIOD.

i2 3

Children attending continuation school.

The continuation school in Springfield started in September, 1920,
and had been in operation for less than two years at the time this
study was made. Children working in Springfield, whether residing
in the city or in other towns, had to go to the continuation school four
hours a week. Children temporarily out of employment had to
attend for 20 hours a week, unless they reentered the regular schools.
The practice appeared to be to encourage them to reenter the regular
schools if the unemployment was likely to be of any considerable
duration.
It was found that at the time of the study 36 children between
14 and 16 years of age who had working certificates and were un­
employed were attending the continuation school, while 73 were
back in the regular schools. From September, 1920, to June, 1921,
119 pupils returned to the regular schools when they lost their jobs.
A small number of ' ‘ home-permit” children— 12 boys and 3
girls—were attending the continuation school at the time of the
study. A statement by the office of the school gave the following
as the main types of home-permit cases: “ (1) Girls who have left
school in order to help mothers who are not able, because of poor
health, to do their work alone. (2) Girls who have left school to
help with work at home while their mothers are engaged in outside
work. (3) Girls who live out at domestic service.” Occasionally
a boy was granted a permit to stay at home and help out in an
emergency, or was given such a permit when he was employed in a
private family where he made his home.
Children securing work during the unemployment period.

A total of 155 children between 14 and 16 years of age secured
their first working certificates during the time of the most serious
industrial depression—subsequent to May 1, 1921. Of these children,
122 were working on February 1, 1922, and 33 were not employed.
The information secured from the certficates in regard to the first
jobs held by these children follows. As appeared to be the case in
Racine, many of these jobs might have proved desirable for men or
women who had been thrown out of their regular occupations.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

124

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .
First jobs of children whose original
working permits were secured
subsequent to May 1,1921.
T otal........................................................................................

Number of
children.
......... 155

B o y s......................................................................................................

.........

67

Factory worker....................................................................- •

.........

17

Packer................................................................................

.

4

Doffer.....................................................- • ........................

.

3

Floor b o y ...........................................................................

.

3

Stock b o y ................. .......... .... ......................................

.

3

Card cutter................... ................ ...................................

.

Machine operative........................................................

.

Making ban ds............ .......... .........................................

.

1
1
1

Splitting y a m ..................................................................

.

1

Messenger and errand b o y .................................................

.........

17

Office b o y ..................................................................................
Clerk in store..........................................................................
Cash or floor bo y in department store..........................

.....

9

.......

6

..........

4

Bootblack__________ .'........................................- ................. .

.....

4

Mattress m aker......................................................................

...'.

1

Farm h an d ..............................................................................
Laundry operative, shaking cloth e s.. ........................

......

1

............

1

Helper in—
Auto repair shop..........................................................

1

1
1
1

B in dery................................. ..........................................
Mail r o o m ......................................................................
M ilk house....................................................- ...............

1

Tailor sh op .....................................................................
Upholstering department in department store

1
1

Hom e permit (mother i l l ) .................................................
Girls.................................................................................................. ..
Factory operative..............................................................................................
Wrapping or packing ca n d y.......................................................
13
Turning in or folding paper bo xes........................

8

Dressing d olls..................................................................................-

2

Inspector...............................................................

2

M achine operative............................................................. — -------

2

Assem bler.................................... ...............- .....................................

1

Doffer................................... ......................................... ................... ..
Other— labeling, cutting, binding, sewing on buttons,

jI

sorting, folding aprons..........................

39

1®

Housework away from hom e.......................................- -------- -------- - - - - .
Housework at home (on hom e perm it).................................................... 12
I n hospital diet k itch en .................................................................................
K eeping books for father.................................................. - ........................
Clerk in store.......................................................................................................

2

1
1“*

M illinery apprentice........................................................................................

1

T yp ist and bookkeeper......... .........................................................................

1

Waitress......................................................................................................................... -1

The jobs were not very steady, for the 155 children held 221
different jobs during the nine months that followed. It must, of
course, be borne in mind that the employment periods of the children

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C H IL D LABOR I N

125

A N U N E M P L O Y M E N T PERIOD.

varied in length, many being of very short duration. On February
1, 1922, more than one-fifth of the children were unemployed. The
following list shows the number of jobs held b y each child:
Number of
working
Number of jobs secured.
children.
T otal................................................................................................................... 155

1 ................................................................................................. 112
2 . . . . . ..................................... .................................................... 28
3 ...............................................................

10

4 . . . ..................................................................................................................................
5
........................................................................................

3
1

6

1

.................................................................................................................. '

......................................................................................................................

CHART IX.

SPRINGEIELD, MASS.-EMPLOYMENT O r CHILDREN
BOWS AND GIRLS LEAVING SCHOOL TO ENTER EMPLOYMENT AS INDICATED B Y
INITIAL EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED EACH Y&AR

479

Boys


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Prepared by
John A. Porter;
Attendance officer
P ublic Schools
Springfield, Moss.

126

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W Ë L E A E Ë .

W hy the children left school to go to work.

Inquiry into the causes of the children’s leaving school to go to
work would undoubtedly have yielded important evidence in regard
to the need that existed for the added income derived from the
children’s earnings. Such an investigation would have demanded an
intensive study of the economic conditions in the families of the
children and of the other factors which influenced the children to
leave school to go to work. It was not possible to undertake such
a study in connection with the general inquiry, because data of this
character, in order to be satisfactory, would have to be secured
coincidentally with the child’s first entering employment. However,
the following facts in regard to the families in which there were
working children, which had come to the attention of agencies giving
some form of assistance, furnished some indication of the conditions
in these homes.
At the time of the study, 267 children between 14 and 16 in Springfield had sometime been granted employment certificates and had
gone to work, but many of them had returned to school because they
had lost their jobs and were not able to secure others. The families
of 74 (over one-fourth) of these children had at some time been aided
by a relief society or by the visiting nurses, or employment had been
secured for some member of the family through the city or State
employment offices. The number of families given each of these
kinds of assistance were as follows:
A id from relief society............................................................................................

46

Nursing service....................

33

C ity .................................................

17

State em ploym ent— office j o b s ..............................

12

The proportion of families receiving such assistance was practically
the same for those having children who left school to go to work
before the fathers lost their work as for those whose children left
school after that misfortune, the percentages being 26 and 29, re­
spectively. The families of only 12 of the children were aided by
these agencies after May 1, 1921, the beginning of the period of
serious unemployment. Of the 155 children who secured working
permits after May 1, 1921, only 45 belonged to families that had
ever been given aid, as far as the reports showed, and only 8 of these
families had been aided during the unemployment period.
Unemployment o f children.

The general unemployment situation is reflected in the work his­
tories of the children, as well as in the data concerning the fathers of
families. On February 1, 1922, a total of 109 children, between
14 and 16, who had at some time been granted employment certifi­
cates had lost their jobs and were unemployed. It may be assumed


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

CHILD LABOR IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT PERIOD.

127

that a considerable proportion of these children would not attempt
to go back to work, at least during the period when work was hard to
find, for 73 children had already returned to the regular schools
after they lost their jobs; the other 36 were reported as attending the
continuation school. Almost a fourth of the children who were
unemployed had held three jobs or more, as shown in the following
list:
Number of jobs held.
T o t a l ..............

Number of unem­
ployed children.
.................... 109

1.

58

2.

24

3.

12

4.

13

8.

1
1

10

The length of time that had elapsed since the children lost their
last jobs was reported as follows:
Time since losing
lastjob.

Number of children unemployed Feb. 1, 1922.28

Total..................................................................................................... 109
Less than 1 month
1 m onth....................
2 months..................

25

3 months..................

6

4 months..................

5

5 months..................

2

7

2

6 months..................

1

7 months..................

2

8 months..................

1

9 months..................

4

10 m o n th s...............
11 m onths................
12 m onths................

2
2

13 m onths...........

8
6

14 m onths................

8

15 m onths................

8

16 m onths................

9

17 m onths................

2

18 m onths................

3

19 m onths................

2

20 m onths................

1

N ot reported............

3

The individual case items given in Detailed Tables F and G afford
information regarding the occupation, periods of employment, and
length of time not working for children under 16 who secured permits
for the first time during the serious industrial depression and for
those who had permits secured earlier.
88 Seventy-three were attending a regular school and 36 the continuation school.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

128

u n em plo ym en t

and

c h il d

w elfare

,

D e t a il e d T a b l e F .— S p r i n g f i e l d : C h i l d r e n 1 4 a n d 1 5 y e a r s o f a g e t o w h o m e m p l o y ­
m e n t c e r tific a te s
1, 1922.

h ad been

is s u e d s in c e

M a y 1 ,1 9 2 1

w h o w ere u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y

BOYS.

Age.

Grade
completed.

Length
of time
since
child
first
went to
work
(months).

15

Sixth............

4

15

Seventh.......

4

14

Sixth............

4

15

Seventh.......

4

15
15
15
15
14
15
15
15
14

Eighth.........
....... d o..........
....... do...........
....... do...........
Sixth............
Seventh.......
Eighth.........
....... do...........
Fifth............

Length of
time in each
job.

Jeweler’s apprentice..*................. . 1 week.
Cash boy, department store........... 2 months.
Stamping books, department store. 2 months 2 weeks.
Bundle wrapper, department store. 2 months.

1
2
4
4
3
4 Shoeshlning....... ~................... ......
2 In tailor shop................................
(a)

7

Seventh.......

8

....... d o..........

8

15 ....... d o ..........

8

14

Jobs held.

14 ...d o ..............
14 Ninth...........

7
5

Interval
between
leaving last
job and
Feb. 1,1922.1

Under lmonth.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do
Do.
Do

Bootblack........................................
....... do.............................................. 1 week.
....... do.............................................. 2 months.
Errand b o y ..................................... 1 month 2 weeks.
Telegraph messenger...................... 1 month 2 weeks.
Farm work..............."..................... 3 days.
repairer.
Clerk and errand boy, store........... 1 week.
Telegraph messenger...................... 2 months.
1 month 2 weeks___

Do
Do.
Under 1 month.

3 months.
3 months.
Under lmonth.

Do.

GIRLS.
15 Ninth...........
15 n .r ...............
14 Eighth.........
14 Seventh.......
14 Sixth............
15
15
15
15

Ninth...........
Seventh.......
Sixth............
Eighth.........

15 ___»do...........
14 ....... d o..........
14 Seventh.......
15

15
15

Eighth.........

1
4
4 Wrapping candy.............................
15 ....... d o .. .*.........*..............................
3 Sewing on buttons, coat supply__
Salesgirl...........................................
2
4
4 Housework*at home/.......... .
Wrapping candy.......... ..................
Housework at home........................
4 Folding paper boxes, factory.........
Weighing Hops....... .'...........*...........
Lacing corsets, factory...................
6 Salesgirl............................
5
18 Clerk in store..............................
Housework......................................
8 Salesgirl...........................................
....... d o..............................................

Sixth............
First year
high school.

8
5

....... d o..............................................

Do.
3 weeks.

Do.
1 month 1 week.
2 months.
2 weeks.
2 months 2 weeks.

1 month 1 week.
3 weeks.
3 months 1 week.
3 months 1 week.

Tying and'closing boxes,* factory.. 2 months 1 week___
Millinery apprentice...................

Under lmonth.

Do.
Do.

1 month.
Under lmonth.

Do
Do!

2 months.

1 These children were enrolled in either the continuation school or the regular school during their periods
of unemployment.
3 Less than 1 month.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C H IL D LABOR IN “ A N U N E M P L O Y M E N T PERIOD.

129

D e t a il e d T a b l e G .— S p r i n g f i e l d : C h i l d r e n 1 4 a n d 1 5 y e a r s o f a g e t o w h o m e m p l o y m e n t
c e r tific a te s h a d b e e n is s u e d p r i o r to M a y 1 ,1 9 2 1 , w h o w e re u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y 1 ,1 9 2 2 .

BOYS.

Age.

Grade
completed.

Length
of time
since
child
first
went to
work
(months)

Jobs held.

Length of
time in each
job.

Sixth.

Telegraph messenger.

3 weeks___

Seventh.

Packing, factory....................
Telegraph messenger.............
Floor boy, department store.

3 days.
2 weeks.
3 months 2
weeks.
3 weeks.
1 month 2
weeks.
1 week.
8 months 1
week.
2 weeks.
5 months 3
weeks.
n. r ............
3 months 2
weeks.
1 week.
2 weeks___
2 months.
3 months 2
weeks.
9 months 3
weeks.
1 month 1
week.
7 months.
2 months 1
week.
7 months.
6 months 3
weeks.
1 week....... .
3 weeks.
2 months.
3 days.
2 weeks.......
1 month 1
week.
5 months.
1 month 1
week.
4 months 2
weeks.
1 month......
1 month 3
weeks.
1 week........
1 month 2
weeks.
2 months 2
weeks.
3 months 3
weeks.
8 months__

Cash boy, department store..
Floor boy, department store.
Making mattresses. .
Errand boy, factory.

.do.

Errand boy, store.
Helper at bakery..
.do.

Floor work, factory.
Delivery boy, store..

n. r.........

Errand boy, factory............... .
Errand boy, drug store...........
Floor boy. department store..
Farming (living with family).

Seventh.

Assembling games, factory..

Eighth..

Clerk and errand boy, store.

n. r.

Delivery boy, store.
Doffing....................

Seventh.

Bobbin setter......................
Assembling games, factory.

___ d o ...

Sixth___

Errand b o y ................................
Removing brushes from clutch.
Assembling games, factory.......
Washing ana filling bottles.......
Errand boy, store......................
Assembling games, factory.......

Seventh.

Mail boy, factory...........
Packing games, factory.

Eighth.

Assembling games, factory.
___do.

Filling cases, factory.
Clerk in store...........'.

Ninth.

Mailing department, newspaper office.
Factory work........................................

Sixth..

Core maker.

___ do.

Errand boy.

___do.

Stock boy and errand boy, department
store.
Stock boy, factory....................................... 2 weeks.......
Stringing chain, factory............................. 4 months 3
weeks.
Telegraph messenger................................... 1 week.
Floor boy, factory.................. ..................... 3 months 2
weeks.
Packing in factory.
3 weeks.......
Helper m factory...
3 months 2
weeks.
Filing cores................ ..........
1 month.
Cash boy, department store.
1 week.

F ifth..

Sixth.

20

Ninth.

16

Molding chocolate...............


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2 months 3
weeks.

Interval
between
leaving last
job and
Feb. 1,1922.

Less than
month.

1

4 months.

Less than
month.

Do.

5 months.
Do.
7 months.
8 months.
9 months.
Do.
Do.

10 months.

12 months.

Do.
17 months.
12 months.
Do.
Do.
13 months.

Do.

Do.

1

130

UlsTEMPLOYMESTT A ID CHÌLD WELFARE.

D e t a il e d T a b l e G .— S p r i n g f i e l d : C h i l d r e n 1 4 a n d 1 5 y e a r s o f a g e t o w h o m e m p l o y m e n t
c e r tific a te s h a d b e e n is s u e d p r i o r to M a y
1 9 2 2 — Continued.

1, 1921, w ho

w ere u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y 1 ,

BOY S—Continued.

Age.

Grade
completed.

Length
of time
since
child
first
went to
work
(months).

15
15

Fourth.........
Eighth.........

15
14

15

Fifth............

21

15

15
15
15

23

Eighth___ _

17
15
17

15

17

15

17

15
15
15
15

high school.
Eighth.........

15

16
15
16
16
19

15

18

15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15

17
16
17
19
19
19
19
19

Sixth..

15
15
15
15
15
15

19
19
20
22
Sixth.......

20
17

15

15

15

20

15

15


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jobs held.

Length of
time in each
job.

Interval
between
leaving last
job and
Feb. 1, 1922.

Assembling games....................................... 2 months___
1 month.......
Do.
Packing,"!actory ........................................ 1 month.
Assembling, factory..................................... 2 months 2
weeks.
Assembling.................................................. 1 month 3
Do.
weeks.
Packing......................................................... 2 weeks.
Telegraph messenger.............................. .
1 month 1
week.
5 months 3
Do.
weeks.
Assembling, factory..................................... 1 week.
Doffer, rug company................................... 1 month 1
week.
Assembling, factory..................................... 1 month 2
weeks.
Packing, factory.......................................... 3 months___
Do.
Errand”boy...." ............................................ 2 weeks.......
Do.
3 weeks.......
Do.
Telegraph messenger................................... 1 month 1
week.
Assembling.................................................. 1 month 2
Do.
weeks.
Light shopwork........................................... 1 week......... 15 months.
Light factory work...................................... 3 weeks.
General helper, errand, etc.......................... 1 month 2
weeks.
Office boy, storage company....................... 1 month 2
weeks.
4 weeks.......
Do.
Bending forgings.......................................... 5 days..........
Clerk (not in store)...................................... 1 month.......
Shop boy, factory........................................ 1 month 3
weeks.
Assembling.................................................. 2 months 3
weeks.
Office work................................................... 1 month.
1 month 2
weeks.
Floor boy, department store....................... 1 month.......
3 days..........
3 weeks.......
Boxing garments........ ’. ............................... 2 months___
Telegraph messenger................................... 3 months___
....... d o .:............... t ....................................... 3 months___
2 months___
Clerk in store....'......................................... 1 month 1
week.
2 weeks.......
1 week.........
3 weeks.......
Errand"boy.........T....................................... 1 month 2
weeks.
n. r...............
1 month.......
Clerk in store................................................ 1 month 1
week.
Bundle b o y .................................................. 3 months.
Auto mechanic............................................. 4 months 2
weeks.
1 week.........
Bundle boy,"department store................... 2 months 1
week.
3 weeks........
Filling orders, factory.................................. 3 months 3
weeks.
Telegraph messenger................................... 3 weeks.
Paelnng games, factory............................... 3 weeks.
1 year 2
months.

Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
16 months.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
18 months.
Do.
19 months.
Do.
20 months.
n. r.
n. r.

Under 1month.
3 months.

1 month.

C H IL D LABOR I N

A H U N E M P L O Y M E N T PERIOD.

131

D e t a il e d T a b l e G .— S p r i n g f i e l d : C h i l d r e n 1 4 a n d 1 5 y e a r s o f a g e t o w h o m e m p l o y m e n
c e r tific a te s h a d b een is s u e d p r i o r to M a y 1 , 1 9 2 1 , w h o w e re u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y 1 ,
1 9 2 2 — Continued.
BOYS—Continued.

Age.

' Length
of time
since
child
Grade
first
completed.
went to
work
(months).

15

Seventh___

18

15

Seventh___

22

15

Eighth.......

19

15

Eighth.......

16

15

Eighth.......

17

Jobs held.

Length of
time in each
job.

Interval
between
leaving last
job and
Feb. 1, 1922.

3 months___ 2 months.
3 weeks.
2 months.
2 months 1
week.
3 months.
1 week.
Spring and wire department, factory......... 2 days.
4 days.
1 week.
2 days.
2 weeks.
11 days.
9 days.
3 days.
2 months 1 13 months.
week.
2 months 1
week.
3 months.
6 days.
6 days.
3 days.
Errand boy and helper, shoe repair......... 1 month 1
week.
1 week.
4 months 3
weeks.
1 month 2
weeks.
10 months... 7 months.
GIRLS.

19

Doffing...............................

First y e a r
highschool.

19

Housework at home..........
Assembling games, factory

Eighth.........

16 ___ do.......... .....................

Seventh.......

Salesgirl..........................

___ d o .................................
Threader, knitting mill
Eighth.........

Salesgirl............................ .
18 Assembling, factory............
Cutting strips, factory.......
Housework (not at home).

Eighth.........
Eighth.........

16
21

Eighth.........
Sixth............

16
16

Fifth............

21

Assembling games, factory,
Doffing...... ........................
Winding, m ill....................
Doffing...............................
.......d o.................................
Turning in, factory...........
Bending in, factory
Paper box factory...
Light packing..........
Housework at home,

Eighth.........

15


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Salesgirl...................
, . , . , d o . .....................

3 months 3 1 month.
weeks.
2 weeks.
2 months 2 2 months.
weeks.
1 year 2
weeks.
2 w eek s..... Less than
month.
11 months 1
week.
1 month 3
weeks.
1 month.
1 month 3
Do.
weeks,
2 months 2
weeks.
1 month 2
weeks.
10 months... 6 months.
2 week*....... 9 months.
4 months.
7 months.
6 months__ 10 months.
4 months 2 11 months.
weeks.
4 m onths....
Da
1 month 3
weeks.
2 weeks.
1 month 3
weeks.
1 week......... 12 months,
2months-

1

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E ,

132
D etail e d T a b l e

G — S p r in g f ie ld : C h ild r e n U

a n d 1 5 y e a r s o f a g e to w h o m e m p lo y m e n t

c e r tific a te s h a d b een i s m e d p r i o r to M a y 1 , 1 9 2 1 , w h o w e re u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y 1 ,
1 9 2 2 — Continued.

Age.

Grade
completed.

Length
of time
since
child
first
went to
work
(months)

GIRLS—Continued.

Jobs held.

Fourth.

Buttoning coats, coat supply company...

N inth..

Stock clerk, department store...................

Eighth.
N inth..
N inth..

Book binding, bindery company.............
Salesgirl................ ................. - .................
Assembling, factory...................................

Ninth.
Sixth..

Salesgirl......................................................
Stocking rubbers, stock room..................•
Salesgirl.............................- ..................... .
Threader, knitting m ill............................
Covering clasps, factory...........................

Seventh.

Packer....... ...............................................
Sewing, factory..................... ..................-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Length of
time in each
job.

Interval
between
leaving last
j ob and
Feb. 1,1922.1

2 months 2 12 months.
weeks.
Do.
6 months 2
weeks.
3 weeks....... 14 months.
Do.
3 weeks.......
3 months 2 15 months.
weeks.
1 month.
2 months— 16 months.
2 weeks....... 17 months.
1 month 1
week.
2 months 1
week.
1 month 1 18 months.
week.
1 month.

SU M M A R IE S O F C O N D IT IO N S BY D IST R IC T S.

The agents who visited the families of unemployed men were re­
quested to sum up briefly the outstanding features of the conditions
in the districts assigned them. The descriptions that follow, relating
to districts in Racine, are given in the words of the agents. They all
tell the same story—families overburdened by debts, discouraged by
long seeking for work, their ambitions for owning their homes doomed
to failure, and illness and unaccustomed dependence on charitable aid.
D i s t r i c t 1. The houses were mostly one and two story frame, in
good repair, and well kept up. There was usually only one family to
a house. Sometimes one family lived in the front of the house and
one in the rear. The houses all had electric lights, running water,
and indoor toilets. All the houses had small yards, and many had
also a small garden. Several had a garage on the back of the lot.
The 37 families visited in this district represented eleven nationali­
ties, but nearly all spoke English. The majority of the families
interviewed had never before been in such difficult circumstances
financially. They were families who had always made enough money
to keep their bills paid up, and perhaps to put a little in the bank.
Following the outbreak of war, when wages were very good, many of
the families bought homes. In many cases rents were so high that
they were practically forced to do this, and they bought homes that
cost very much more than they would otherwise have felt justified
in paying. The initial cash payment was often not more than $100
or $200 on a $3,000 property, the buyer contracting to make monthly
payments of from $20 to $30 or $40, part of which applied on the
principal of the mortgage, the rest covering interest charges. The
families felt able to carry such an undertaking successfully while the
father was holding a steady job; but as soon as he was thrown out
of work, they fell behind in the payments. Many families were on
the verge of losing their homes because they could not meet the
payments. Many were confident that as soon as the fathers could
go back to work they would get on their feet again.
Some of the men felt that the situation was quite hopeless. They
said they were forced to sit around idle while the debts piled up,
and they were getting so deeply into debt it would take years to get
even again. All they wanted was an opportunity to get work.
They did not ask or want charity, but merely a chance to earn an
honest living.
Most of the families were running up large bills at the grocery and
the meat market, had borrowed money wherever they could, and
133


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

134

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

were doing everything to keep from asking for charitable aid, or
even for credit from the city commissary.
During and just after the war, when the wages were high the
majority of the people were enjoying such successful times, and were
so sure that the conditions would continue indefinitely, or at least for
several years longer, that the standard of living was raised. When
the change came it was especially hard for all these people.
D i s t r i c t 2 . The conditions here were less favorable than those in
the first district. The district included some houses around the fac­
tories, also some along the railroad, and ran out to the city limits.
The houses in the manufacturing section of the district were one and
two story tumble-down frame houses, with two or more families to a
house. Beyond this section was a good residential neighborhood
composed of one and two story frame houses, usually with one family
to a house. The majority of the 23 families scheduled were foreign
born. Most of them spoke English, though some rather brokenly.
More of the families in this district rented their homes than in
district 1, but those who had undertaken to buy houses were facing
the same problem of back payments. The standard of living was
not so high as in the first district, and more families had asked for
aid from the relief society.
Employment for women seemed as scarce as for the men. Several
of the women said that they had walked the streets trying to find work
to do. Very few of the children over 16 were working, because there
was no work to be had. As a result, some were going to continuation
school every day, and one or two to business college.
The situation in regard to debts was the same as in the first district.
When they could get no further credit from their own grocery they
were obliged to go to the factory commissary or to the relief society.
Most of the men spoke very highly of their former employers, and felt
that they had tried to do the squarest thing. They said they did not
know what they would have done if the company had not loaned them
money and sold them groceries on credit.
D i s t r i c t 3 was a good neighborhood next to the best residence
district of the town. The houses were all of much the same type—
two-story frame structures, most of which had electric lights, gas for
cooking, storm windows and doors, and inside water closets, but very
few had bathrooms. Many families had tacked tar paper securely
over the front door, which was therefore closed for the winter. Few
houses had furnace heat; in some the gas had been turned off, and
the families were using coal stoves for cooking because they furnished
heat as well. All the houses had yard space, and most of the families
had gardens. A few kept chickens.
With but few exceptions the families were thrifty people who were
trying hard to pay for their homes and educate their children. There

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

S U M M A R IE S OF C O N D ITIO N S B Y DISTRICTS.

135

were several instances where special pride was shown over the progress
of the children in school. One mother said her daughter was walking
to and from school, 15 blocks, four times a day and would not miss
a day for anything, even though the weather was very severe and the
child had insufficient clothing. Another child in the same family
told her mother she wished she could go to school on Saturday, too.
In one family the father was spending $15 a month, the amount he
received from rental of rooms, to pay the expenses of the son in busi­
ness college. As a whole, the children seemed to be advanced in
school. One small girl was teaching English to her father.. Two
fathers were attending night schools and studying English. A few of
the older children were working and attending the continuation
school. Most of the families, however, had no children of working
age.
A high percentage of the people in the district were receiving
charitable aid or buying on promissory notes from the city commissary.
They all seemed to be in very similar positions. A great majority
had begun to buy their homes when they w ereeemaking good m oney*}
and had paid fairly high prices. Then they lost their jobs and as a
consequence were not only unable to meet the monthly payments •
but had to ask aid to secure food and clothes. Very few families
had received aid before the present unemployment period. The
conditions seemed the more lamentable, because so many had been
in a position to acquire their homes, educate their children, and bring
them up to be good citizens. No case of mortgage foreclosure was
found, but this was probably due to the fact that the holders felt
there was nothing to be gained thereby. Real estate prices had
declined, and they probably would not get so good a price again,
especially since people were not in a position to buy at any price.
Many of the families were without sufficient clothes for the winter.
Most who had received any had got them through the central associa­
tion. Two mothers had been able to make coats and shirts for the
children from clothes given them by neighbors, and one mother had
laid in a supply of materials while the father was working; all she
lacked was shoes. One mother was keeping a child home from school
because of lack of shoes. She said she had not the 14 cents for carfare
to get to the aid society’s office to ask for shoes, and if she did go
they would probably not have any to give. One family, which from
outside appearances seemed to be in more fortunate circumstances
than most of the families visited, had almost nothing in their house,
and the children were clothed only in very ragged underwear and
old coats. One mother had a 2-weeks-old baby for whom she had
no clothes. Shiftlessness seemed to be the keynote in only two
families. In one the father had been in the State prison for 11 months;
4 9 0 0 0 °— 23------- 10


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

136

U N E M P L O Y M E N T AND

C H IL D W E L F A R E .

the mother received aid during this time. The other family was an
old charity case; the children begged on the streets and were noted
for playing truant from school.
There had been something of an epidemic of scarlet fever and
diphtheria within the last year and a half. One mother said it
seemed as if everything had struck them at once. One of her children
was just recovering from pneumonia and another was in the isolation
hospital with scarlet fever. Most families reported children’s diseases.
In three families visited the mothers were especially miserable.
One mother was pregnant and could not afford a doctor, and was
feeling very bad. Another mother had great trouble with her nose,
head, and throat. She looked very ill and said she thought she would
have to go to the hospital.
D i s t r i c t 4. This district was an old residence section with several
large factories, and was cut through by two or three long business
streets and the railroad tracks. The houses were one or two stories
high, a few were of brick, but the majority were of frame construction;
many needed painting, but most of them were otherwise in good repair.
Only a few of the houses were equipped with bathrooms, but nearly
•all had inside toilets, either within the apartment itself, or in the hall
or basement. A few homes were heated by furnaces, the rest by coal
stoves; nearly all had either gas or electric lights. The sizes of the
lots varied. The older houses had front, side, and back yards, with
space for gardens; the newer ones were built close together, with
only narrow passages between and front entrances on the sidewalk.
The population of this district was largely foreign, with a scattering
of American born. The nationalities most common were Polish,
Bohemian, Russian, German, Lithuanian, Hungarian, and Italian.
During the past year a number of Armenians had come in— families
in which the mother and children had come to America during the
last 12 months, worn and broken b y years of suffering in Armenia.
These families were highly spoken of by the relief society, for they
demanded so little— scarcely enough for their own good.
Over half the families visited in this district were buying their
homes on “ land contract,” which entailed a small initial deposit, and
monthly payments of from $15 to $50, which included the interest on
the mortgage and a small payment on the principal. About twothirds of them began buying their houses during the war, when wages
were high and work was plentiful. A few had borrowed money to keep
up their payments, but the majority were behind from one month to
one year, and if relief did not come soon, were likely to lose everything
they had put into the venture. None of the families visited had lost
their homes so far, though one family had had to make a rather un­
usual and complicated trade, contracting for a more expensive house,
in order not to lose the $2,000 already invested.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

S U M M A R IE S OE C O N D IT IO N S B Y DISTRICTS.

137

Local grocers, butchers, and bakers had given credit to the limit.
Families owed as much as $200 to one grocer, and many had run
bills in several different places. Everyone was utterly discouraged,
with no hope for the future. The situation was getting desperate.
People could not keep their homes much longer without making
payments; credit was exhausted, and many families had already
gone into debt at the city or factory commissary. Many felt beyond
all hope of ever getting clear of debt.
D i s t r i c t 5. The common type of house in this district was t h e
small one-story frame cottage, with no modern improvements except,
sometimes, gas for lighting. Few had electricity and very few had
bathrooms; some toilets were in the basement, but often they were
outdoors. Of the two-story houses, many accommodated a family
on each floor, the second floor being reached by a rear stairway
leading to the kitchen.
In the eastern section of this district most of the homes visited
were of better construction, had gas and electricity and were located
on paved streets with sidewalks and were easily accessible to stores,
schools, and churches. Many were owned, but a few were rented.
In one part of this section there were many different factories and
several large lumberyards, which with the railroad tracks made it
an undesirable neighborhood in which to reside.
In the extreme west of this district was a new subdivision in which
a few of the scheduled families lived. Here was found a much better
type of house— two-story one-family dwellings, modem up-to-date
homes with good yards, which were on paved streets with sidewalks.
Most of these were being bought on the monthly payment system and
were really more expensive than the families would have bought had
they not been forced to buy them during the time of scarcity of
houses. Some had lost their homes through failure to pay the monthly
installments.
A dozen different nationalities were represented in this district,
many of whom spoke their native tongue in the home, although in
all the families either the mother or the father, or both, could speak
English.
In most of the families visited in this district the father had been
unemployed so long that, while the standard of living in regard to
housing conditions had not been reduced very generally, in most
cases there had been a decided lowering in the quantity and quality
of food and clothes, and all recreation had been eliminated. In
many homes the kitchen was the most used room because during the
winter it was the only one which could be kept heated. Most of the
homes were fairly clean. Possibly there had not been much change
in the general attention given to the home, except in a few cases
where the mother had been working. In the greater number of

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

138

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

families it seemed very apparent that no special attention was given
to the preparation and serving of meals. Many times the agent was
at homes where the children came from school at noon. They would
help themselves to whatever was available, seeming to be perfectly
contented not to sit down to a prepared meal.
In many homes signs were placed in the windows advertising
“ Furniture for sale,” “ Baby carriage for sale,” “ Plain sewing done,”
“ Day work wanted,” “ Shoe repairing neatly done,” in addition to
“ Furnished room ” signs, and there were other indications that fam­
ilies were trying in every way to earn something. Not many of these
families had gardens; in most cases this was due to lack of space. A
few had chickens. . Many families had held out as long as they were
able by running bills at stores, but at the time of the visit they had
had to seek assistance from relief organizations and through them
were obtaining supplies from the city commissary, payment for which
was to be made when the men were again employed.
The conditions which seemed appalling were found in the f amilies
of native-born fathers, some of whom had lived all their lives in the
city or its vicinity, and who were ambitious and industrious and most
anxious for work but who had been out of work for more than one
year. They were held here because of lack of money to go elsewhere,
because they wished to keep the children in school, or because they
were buying a house. The foreign-born men who had lived many
years in the city and who had made high wages during the war, but
who had saved little because of high prices, faced similar situations.
Some of the men who lived in this district were skilled workers, many
were laborers, and very few were casual laborers. The impression
gained from talking to many of the fathers was that they were a selfrespecting set of men, who wished work in order to keep their homes
and families and to give their children the best that they were able to.
Very few instances were found in which mothers or children were
working, for there was not any more work for them than there was
for the men.
D i s t r i c t 6 was on the whole better off than the preceding one.
Part of it was in a new subdivision which had recently been added
to the city. Here were located story-and-a-half and two-story frame
houses, pleasantly situated on well-paved and well-lighted streets.
Most of these homes were quite new and were being purchased by
families on the “ land contract system” — that is, payment by monthly
installments which included interest and a small payment on the
principal. Many families were still living in houses purchased in
this way; only a few had lost them, but many others felt that before
long the real estate-company would force them to vacate for non­
payment of installments. Homes in this district were mostly furnace
heated; they had gas, electricity, and plumbing facilities, except a

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

SUMMARIES OE CONDITIONS BY DISTRICTS.

139

very few which were so close to the city limits that such improve­
ments had not reached them. These most distant homes were rather
inaccessible to street cars and stores, but schools and churches were
being built near by. The part of the district nearer to the city was a
fairly good neighborhood of frame dwellings* some one-family and
many two-family homes. It was much more convenient to cars,
stores, schools, and churches, and was also near many of the large
factories. These homes were not new, but most of them had heating
and plumbing systems and gas.
The population of this district included people of 15 different
nationalities, among them a large number of American bom . Despite
the varied population nearly all the parents could speak English;
only in very few cases did the foreign born continue to speak in the
native tongue. Especially in families in which there were children
going to school and also in those in which the father or both parents
had attended night school was English spoken.
Most of the homes in this district were comfortably furnished,
and the families were striving hard to keep up appearances. Many
had gone the limit in running bills and as a last resort had had to
seek aid from relief organizations. New clothing they could do
without, but food they had to have. These families were securing
supplies through the city commissary, payment for which was to be
made when the fathers were reemployed. Many had small gardens
and kept chickens, which had furnished some food for them during
the stringent times.
All the children seen appeared to be strong and healthy, although
the mothers often remarked that their faces were fat, but their bodies
very thin. There was very little illness reported during this period
of unemployment. Most of the children scheduled seemed to be up to
standard in their grades, and some even above. The father’s unem­
ployment seemed to have had very little effect on the schooling of
the children.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

APPEN D IX A .— TABLES.
T a b l e 1 .— R a c i n e : D u r a t i o n o f u n e m p l o y m e n t o f f a t h e r a n d l a s t r e g u l a r o c c u p a t i o n .

Unemployed fathers.
Duration of unemployment.
Father’s last regular occupation.
Total.

Total.................................................

15
Less
6 to 8
9 to 11
12 to 14 months
than 6 months.
and
months. months. and over
months.
not
reported.

231

31

28

i70

Laborer..................................................
Molder and caster.......I .............................
Machinist....................................................
Assembler...................................................
Machine operative...... ...............................
Blacksmith, forge, and hammer man.......
Trucker and driver....................................
Coremaker...............................................
Mechanic........ ............................................
•Tool and pattern maker............................
Bench worker.............................................
Blacksmith’s helper..................................
Painter, vamisher, and sander.................
Riveter.................................. .....................
Welder................ .......................................
Filer, polisher, and buffer.........................
Miscellaneous mechanical and manufac­
turing.......................................................
O ther....................... .............................

13

1 Includes 3 fathers for whom duration of unemployment was not reported.
T a b l e 2 .— S p r i n g f i e l d : D u r a t i o n o f u n e m p l o y m e n t o f f a t h e r a n d l a s t r e g u l a r o c c u p a t i o n .

Unemployed fathers.
Duration of unemployment.
Father’s last regular occupation.
Total.

Total...................................................

135

Machinist....................................................
Laborer in factory.......................................
Painter.............. '.........................................
Laborer, other..............................................
Molder and caster........................................
Trucker and driver......................................
Tool and pattern maker..............................
Assembler.....................................................
Clerical..........................................................
Machine operative................... : ..................
Mechanic.*....................................................
Filer, polisher, and buffer j.........................
Miscellaneous mechanical and manufactaring........................................... ............

33
9
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
39
7

Less
6 to 8
9 to 11
than 6
months. months. months.

13

1
1
1
1

6
3

15
months
12 to 14 and
months.. and over
not
reported.

34

20

36

13 2

6
2
2
3
1
1
1
2
2

4
1
1

13
3
i
2
2

10
3
2

1
1

2
1
2

3
1

2

8
2

7
1

1
1
10

1 Includes 7 fathers for whom duration of unemployed was not reported.
143


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1
2
1
1
2
1

8
1

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELEAItE.

144

T able 3.— R a c i n e :

C o u n tr y

o f b ir th o f u n e m p b y e d fa th e r s ,
U n ite d S ta te s a n d w o r k s ta tu s .

by

le n g th

o f re s id e n c e

m

Fathers previously employed at skilled trade.

Country of birth.

Total
unem­
ployed
fathers.

Total................
United States............
Armenia....................
Austria......................
Canada.......................
Denmark...................
England.....................
Holland......................
Hungary....................
Ireland.......................
Italy...........................
Yugoslavia.................
Lithuania..................
Norway......................
Russia........................
Sweden......................
Turkey......................

231
52
6
14
1
21
13
2
7
1
8
1
13
3
21
4
38
22
3
1

Length of residence in United States.
Total.

5 to 9
years.

170
43
2
11
1
14
10
2
5
1
6
1
7
2
15
4
32
11
v 3

15 to
10 to
14 years. 19 years.

20 years
and
over.

Bom in
United
States.

44

34

43

34

14

Not re­
ported.
1

43
2

1
4

3

4

5
4
2

2
1
1

4

1
1

2

5
3
9
4

1
4
2

2
1
7
14
3

1
3
1
2
6
5

3
1
2
1
5
1
3

1

1
Fathers previously employed at unskilled trade.
Length of residence in United States.

Country of birth.
Total.

Total................................

61

United States............................
Armenia.....................................
Austria.......................................

19
4
3
7
3
2
2
6
1
6
6
11
1

Denmark.........................- ........
Germany...................................
Italy“. . " .....................................
Yugoslavia................................
Russia........................................
Turkey.......................................
i Includes 1 “ casual worker.'


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Less
than 5
years.

5 to 9
years.

1

15 to
10 to
14 years. 19 years.

20'years
and
over.

15

6

ii

19

2

2
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
2

Born in
United
States.
9
9

1
1
2
1
1
3
1

2
13
1
1
2
2
1
5

1

2
1

A P P E N D IX A .-----TABLES,

T able 4.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

145

C o u n tr y o f b ir th o f u n e m p lo y e d f a th e r s , b y le n g th o f re s id e n c e i n
U n ite d S ta te s a n d w o r k s ta tu s .

Fathers previously employed at skilled trade.

Country of birth.

Total
unem­
ployed
fathers.

Length of residence in United States.
Total.
Under
5 years.

Total................

135

I ll

United States............
Armenia....................
Austria.......................
Canada.......................
Czechoslovakia..........
England.....................
Finland......................
France........................
Germany....................
Greece........................
Ireland.......................
Italy...........................
Lithuania...................
Poland.......................
Russia........................
Scotland....................
Sweden......................
Syria...........................
Turkey.......................

62
3
2
9
2
1
3
1
1
2
8
14
2
10
3
2
7
2
1

50
3
2
8
2
1
3
1
1
2
6
10
2
8
2
2
7

2

5 to 9
years.

10 to 14
years.
4

1

u

17

i

1

1
i

1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1

15 to 19 20 years Bom in
years. and over. United
States.

i
2
2
1
1
1

27

50
50

1
2
4
1
1
3

2
i

Fathers previously employed at unskilled trade.
Total
Country of birth.

ploved
fathers.

Length of residence in United States.
Total.
5 to 9
years.

Total................

135

24

United States...........
Armenia....................
Austria.......................
Canada.......................
Czechoslovakia..........
England.....................
Finland......................
France........................
Germany....................
Greece........................
Ireland.......................
Italy...........................
Lithuania...................
Poland.......................
Russia.......................
Scotland....................
Sweden......................
Syria...........................
Turkey.......................

62
3
2
9
2
1
3
1
1
2
8
14
2
10
3
2
7
2
1

11 2

1 Includes 2 casual workers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2

10 to 14
years.

3

15 to 19 20 years. Born in
years. and over.
States.
3

3

12

Not reported.

1

12

1

1

2
4

2

2

1

2
1

1

1
1

1

1

1
1

1

146

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A E E .

T able 5.— R a c i n e :

L ite r a c y a n d n a tiv ity o f fa th e r ,
fa th e r .

b y d u r a tio n

o f u n e m p lo y m e n t

of

Unemployed fathers.
Duration of unemployment.

Literacy and nativity of father.
Total.

231
52
52
179
154
5
78
71
22
3

Less than 6 to 8
6 months. months.
7

31
5
5
26
23
1
10
12
3

3
3
4
4
1
3

9 to 11
months.

12 to 14 15 months
months. and over.

28

95

70

8
8
20
15

24
24
71
63

6
9
4
1

36
27
8

12
12
58
49
4
25
20
7
2

11, e., other than English.

T able 6.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

L ite r a c y a n d n a tiv ity o f f a th e r , b y d u r a tio n o f u n e m p lo y m e n t o f
fa th e r .

Unemployed fathers.
Duration of unemployment.

Literacy and nativity of father.
Total.

135

B oth ...

................................

62
62
73
67
2
18
47
5
1

12 to 14 15 months
months. and over.

Less than 6 to 8
6 months. months.

9 to 11
months.

34

20

36

32

18
18
16
13

10
10
10
9

14
14
22
20

13
13
19
19

4
9
2
1

1
8
1

5
15
2

8
11

13
7
7
6
6
2
4

1 1, e., other than English.

T able 7.— R a c i n e :

C itizen sh ip o f f o r e i g n - b o r n u n e m p l o y e d fa th ers, b y l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e
m

th e U n i t e d S t a t e s .

Foreign-bom fathers.

Length of residence in United States.
Total.

Total............................................................. ........................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Not
Citizens. citizens.

Not citi­
zens but
having
first
papers.

179

76

34

69

1
25
52
60
20
20
1

5
12
23
16
19
1

11
12
10

1
9
28
27
4

1

147

A P P E N D IX A .— TA BLES.

T able 8.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

C itiz e n s h ip o f f o r e ig n - h o r n u n e m p lo y e d f a th e r s ,
r e s id e n c e i n th e U n i t e d S t a t e s .

by

le n g th

of

Foreign-born fathers.

Length of residence in the United States.
Total.

Not
Citizens. citizens.

Total..........

73

35

22

Under 5 years___
5-9 years.............
10-14 years..........
15-19 years..........
20-24 years..........
25 years and over.
Not reported.......

2
6
14
20
15
15
1

1
7
9
7
11

4
2
7
5
3
1

T able 9.— R a c i n e :

Not
citizens,
but
having
first
papers.
16
2
i
5
4
3
1

T e n u r e o f h o m e s o c c u p ie d b y f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y d u r a tio n
o f occupancy.

Families of unemployed men.
Tenure of home.
Duration o f occupancy.
Owned.

Total.
Total.

Mort­
gaged.

Free.

Rented.

Total.............

231

145

9

136

86

10 years and over...
5- 9 years..................
4 years.....................
3 years.....................
2 years.....................
1 year......................
6- 1 1 months............
Less than 6 months.
Time not reported..

10
39
15
33
40
36
23
28
7

9
32
6
30
33
25
3
2
5

2
5
1
1

7
27
5
29
33
25
3
2
5

1
7
9
3
7
11
20
26
2

T able 10.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

T e n u r e o f h o m e s o c c u p ie d b y f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y
d u r a tio n o f o c c u p a n c y .

Families of unemployed
men.
Duration of occupancy.

Tenure of home.
Total.
Owned.! Rented.

T o ta l...........

135

28

107

10 years and over...
5- 9 years..................
4 years.....................
3 years.....................
2 years.....................
1 year.......................
6- 11 months............
Less than 6 months.
Time not reported..

7
20
13
12
20
25
16
18
4

4
6
1
4
4
6
1

3
14
12
8
16
19
15
18
2

All owned homes were mortgaged.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2

148

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

T able

1 1 .— R a c in e :

M o n th ly r e n ta l o f f a m ilie s o c c u p y in g re n te d h o u se s d u r in g fa th e r 's
u n e m p lo y m e n t, b y n u m b e r o f ro o m s i n h o u se.

T able 12.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

M o n th ly r e n ta l o f f a m ilie s o c c u p y in g r e n te d
fa th e r 's u n e m p lo y m e n t, b y n u m b e r o f ro o m s i n h o u se.

T able 13.— R a c i n e :

h o u ses

d u r in g

N u m b e r o f p e r s o n s i n h o u s e h o ld s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y n u m b e r o f
ro o m s i n h o u se.

Families of unemployed men.
Number of rooms in house.

Number in household.
Total.

Total.............................
4
X

fi

.............................

..................

7 ............................................
...................................
8


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

231
47
59
50
30
22
13
6
1
1
2

i

i

4

3

2

i

8 and
over.

7

6

5

4

18

33

74

54

30

3

7
10

11
7
7
3
3
2

14
25
16
9
9

7
14
14
10
4
5

5
2
10
5
• 3
2
2

1

1

1

1

17
1
1
3
2
4
3
1
2

A P P E N D IX A .— TABLES.

T able 14.

S p r in g fie ld :

149

N u m b e r o f• p e r s o n s i n h o u s e h o ld s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y n u m b e r
o f ro o m s i n h ou se.

Families of unemployed men.
Renting prior to unemployment.
Present rental and
whether family have
moved since unem­
ployment.
Total. Rental
same
as.
pres­
ent. Total.

Rental different from present.
Less
than
$10.

$10,
less
than
$15.

$15,
less
than
$20.

$20,
less
than
$25.
12

$25,
less
than
$30.

Not
Rental rent­
ing.
not
$30,
re­
and ported.
over.

Total...................

231

28

52

2

7

17

4

10

3

148

Moved...........................

55

4

43

2

7

14

<r

4

7

1

7

Less than $10.........
$10, less than $15...
$15, less than $20...
$20, less than $25...
$25, less than $30. ..
$30 and over..........
Not renting............

4
15
17
8
4
2
5

1
1
2

3
14
15
5
2

1
1

2
2
1

7
4
2

2
3
2

1
2
1

1
5

1

2

Did not m ove..............

176

24

9

3

3

$10, less than $15...
$15, less than $20...
$20, less than $25...
$25, less than $30...
$30 and over..........
Not renting........

13
19
2
1
1
140

9
14

2
5
1
1

i
2

i
2

4

1

1 Owned house previous to unemployment, later rented.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1
1

i

1

1

141
1
1
i

2

1l

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

150

T able 1 6 — S p r in g fie ld : M o n th ly r e n ta l a t tim e o f s tu d y o f f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n ,
h y m o n th ly r e n ta l p r e v io u s to u n e m p lo y m e n t.

Families of unemployed men.
Renting prior to unemployment.
Present rental and
whether family
have moved since
unemployment.

Total.
Moved.
Less than $10..
$10, less than $15
$15, less than $20
$20,less than $25

Rental different from present rental.

Total

Rental
same as
present. Total.

lies.

$25,
less
than
$30.

$20,
less
than
$25.

$15,
less
than
$20.

$10,
less
than
$15.

135

57

38

5

15

7

30

5

19

3

7

4

1

11

2
2

2
4
4
7
2

1
1

19

2

1

1
2
2
2

$30
and
over.

4

Rental
not re­
ported.

7

13

27

5

5

1

1
1

1
2
1

1
1

3
2

104
1
11
20
25
13

$30 and over.
Not renting..
Not reported.......
$10, less than $15.

51
7
12
16
10
g

27
1

1

2
5
7
3
1
i

2

1

t Rented house previous to unemployment, later owned.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

8

3
4
1

3

1
2

4

1
1
1
1

1

1

Not renting.
Did not m ove...

Not
renting.

2

8

26

1
2
3
2

1

26

il
1

APPENDIX A.— TABLES.
T able 17.— R a c i n e :

151

T o t a l r e s o u r c e s o f f a m i l y d u r i n g f a t h e r ’s u n e m p l o y m e n t , b y d u r a t i o n
o f u n e m p lo y m e n t a n d o w n e r s h ip o f h o m e.

Families of unemployed men.
Total resources during father’s unemployment.

Duration of unemployment
and ownership of home.

Total. $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, $600, $700, $800, $900,
Not
less less less less less less less less less $1,000 re­
than than than than than than than than than and port­
over.
$200. $300. $400. $500. $600. $700. $800. $900. $1,000
ed.
Total..........................

231

Owned free from mortgage.

9

6-7 months...........................
7-8 months...........................
1 1 -1 2 months........................
12-13 months.......................
14-15 months.......................
15-17 months.......................

1
1
1
1
2
3

3

6

10

7

10

11

7

38

131

2

1

Mortgaged........................

136

3

1
3
1
7
13
5
4
4
27
13
18
37
3

1
1

Rented..............................

86

Less than 4 months............
5-6 months...........................
6-7 months...........................
7-8 months...........................
8-9 months...........................
9-10 months.........................
10 -11 months.......................
1 1 -1 2 months.......................
12-13 months.......................
13-14 months........................
14-15 months.......................
15-18 months.......................

1
2
1
3
4
5
4
5
12
11
11
27

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

4

2

2

1

1

1

4

5

2

1

2

1

i

1
2

6

1

2

21

1
1

3
7

x

5

2

1
3
x

1

4

6

5

2

4

4

5

8
5

15

i

1
1

1

1

1
1
1
1

1


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

5

1

Less than 4 months............
5-6 months...........................
6-7 months...........................
7-8 months...........................
8-9 months...........................
9-10 months.........................
10 -11 months.......................
1 1 -1 2 months.......................
12-13 months.................. 1..
13-14 months............... .......
14-15 months.......................
15-22 months........................
Not reported........................

49090°— 23------11

3

1

1

41

1

2

1

"2

1

1
3

3
14
10
12
23
3

4
4
7

i
1
9

9

11

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE,

152

T able 18.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

T o t a l r e s o u r c e s o f f a m i l y d u r i n g f a t h e r ’s u n e m p l o y m e n t ,
d u r a tio n o f u n e m p lo y m e n t a n d o w n e r s h ip o f h o m e.

by

Families of unemployed men.
Total resources during father’s unemployment.
Duration of unemployment
and ownership of home.1
Total. Less $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, $600, $700, $800, $1,000 Not
reless less less less less less less less and
than than
portthan than than than than than than
$100. $200. $300. $400. $500. $600. $700. $800. $900. over. ed.
135

2

1

28

1

1

3
2
4
4
2
i
i
4
7

1

107

1

6
2
2
8
11
5
10
5
2
6
15
10
18
7

2

3

4

3

2

2

1

17

98

1

5

19
2
1
3
2
2
1

1

1

1

1

1
1

2

3

3

3

2

2

3

4
4

12

79

1
1

5
2
2
7
10
3
6
3
1
4
10
6
15
5

1
1

1

1
1

1
1
1
1

1

1

1
1

1
4
2
3

1

1

1

i No homes were owned free from mortgage.

T able 19.—

S o u r c e s o f in c o m e d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t i n f a m il i e s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y
c ity .

Families of unemployed men having each specified source
of income.
Sources of income during unemployment.

Springfield.

Racine.

Total.

Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent.
Total...................................................
Father’s earnings from temporary w ork...
Mother’s earnings........................................
Children’s earnings......................... ............
Income from lodgers, boarders, or relatives
lodging or boarding with family..............
Income from rent.........................................
Aid from relatives........................................
Charitable aid..............................................
Credits for food............................................
Loans............................................................
Other debts..................................................
Savings used................................................
Other sources...............................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

100.0

231

100.0

135

100.0

362
115
75

98.9
31.4
20.5

229
65
46

99.1
28.1
19.9

133
50
29

98.5
37.0
21.5

56
60
38
191
240
117
253
158
15

15.3
16.4
10.4
52.2
65.6
32.0
69.1
43.2
4.1

42
46
14
141
187
97
174
97
2

18.2
19.9
6 .1
61.0
81.6
42.0
75.3
42.0
0.9

14
14
24
50
53
20
79
61
13

10.4
10.4
17.8
37.0
39.3
14.8
58.5
45.2
9.6

366

APPENDIX A.---- TABLES.
T able 20 .

153

R a c in e a n d S p r in g f o ld : A v e r a g e m o n th ly re so u rc e s o f f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d
m e n p r io r to u n e m p lo y m e n t a n d d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t.

Families of unemployed men.
Average monthly resources dur­
ing unemployment.

Average monthly resources year prior to unemployment.
Total.
$50,less $100, less $150,less $200, less $250,less Not re­
than $100. than $150. than $200. than $250 than $300. ported.

Total................................

366

Less than $30..................
$30, less than $40.............
$40, less than $50.....................
$50, less than $60.......................
$60, less than $70....................
$70, less than $80................
$80, less than $90....................
$90, less than $100................
$100, less than $110................
$110, less than $120.............
$120, less than $130............. .
$130, less than $140....................

6
12
18
22
18'
10
15
7
8
4
3
1
1
10
231

$150 and over........................
Amount not reported..............

T able 2 1 .

8
1
3
4
6
4
2
3

1
2

45

21

i
i
i

1
1

2

235

11

1
1
1
1

2
2
3
1

i
i
3
27

1

1
12

*0

1
1

5
161

R a c i n e : D u r a t i o n o f f a t h e r ’s u n e m p l o y m e n t , b y f a
te m p o ra r y w o rk d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t.

Families of unemployed men.
Father’s total earnings
from temporary work
during unemployment.

Duration of father’s unemployment.
Total. Less
Not
than 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 15-22 re­
4 mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. port­
mos.
ed.

Total........................

231

2

No temporary work..........
Temporary work..............
$10, less than $25............
$25, less than $50............
$50, less than $75............
$75, less than $100...........
$100, less than $150.........
$150, less than $200.........
$200, less than $250.........
$250, less than $300...... 1.
$300, less than $400.........
$400, less than $500.........
$500 and over..................
Amount not reported__

2
229
6
19
22
13
15
22
10
11
12
6
21
72

1
1


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1

5
5
1

3

il

3

il

2

3
2

1

2
1

1

17
17
4
1
6

10

3

2
1

2

8
8
1
1

10
10
1
1
1

3
1

1
1

10

1

3

'3

4

1
1

1
5

40

24

31

67

3

40
1
2
2
1
2

24

1
30

67

3

1
1

2
3

5
5

3
1
2
4

x
2

il

10

3

2

11

21

1

X54

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

T able 2 2 — S p r i n g f i e l d :

D u r a tio n o f fa th e r 's u n e m p lo y m e n t, b y f a th e r 's to ta l e a r n in g s

fro m

te m p o ra r y w o rk d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t.

Families of unemployed men.
Duration of father’s unemployment.
Father’s total earn­
ings from tempo­
rary work during
Not
unemployment.
Total. Less
13
14 15-25 re
12
11
10
8
9
7
6
5
than 4
port­
mos.
mos.
mos.
4 mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos.
ed.
mos.
Total...............
No temporary work..
Temporary work----Le&s Ilian $10............
$10, less than $25...
$25, less than $50...
$50, less than $75...
$75, less than $100..
$100, less than $150.
$150, less than $200.
$200, less than $250.
$250, less than $300.
$300, less than $400.
$400, less than $500.
Not reported..........

2
133
3
1
6
8
9
6
5
7
5
10
7
21
45

T able 23.— R a c i n e :

2

9

135

1
1

9
3

i

1
2
1
1

2

10

15

9

12

6

2

6

16

14

25

7

2

1
9

15

9

12

6

2

6

16

14

25

7
1

1

1

2
1

2

1

1

i

1

1

3
1

1
1

1
1

2
2
4
1

3

4

1
3
2

3

1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4

1

1
1

1

2

2
1

2
‘1

1
1
1
1
4
8

2
1
2
7

1
1
1
2
5
11

1
4

N u m b e r o f p e r s o n s i n f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y w e e k ly in c o m e
a t tim e o f s tu d y .

Families of unemployed men.

Number of
persons in
family.

Total...

9
...
10
13...................

Weekly income at time of study.
Total.

Less
than
$5.

$5,
less
than
$10.

$10,
less
than
$15.

$15,
less
than
$20.

$20,
less
than
$25.

$25,
less
than
$30.

$30,
less
than
$35.

$35,
less
than
$40.

231

22

20

13

22

17

16

5

3

6
4

2
5
3
3
2
2

6
6
2
2

1

1
1
1

54
65
43
35
19
11
3
1


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

7
9
1
4
i

6

3

3
2
1

2
1

5
2
2

3
1

No
Not
$40
weekly
re­
and
over. ported. income.

2
1
1

15

96

3
3
2
3
2
1
1

21
27
20
18
7
3

APPENDIX A.— TABLES.
T able

155

24.— S p r i n g f i e l d : N u m b e r o f p e r s o n s i n f a m i l i e s o f u n e m p l o y e d m e n , b y w e e k l y
in c o m e a t tim e o f s tu d y .

Families of unemployed men.
Number of
persons in
family.

Weekly income at time of study.
Total.

Total...

135

4....... ............
5 ...................
6....................
7....................
8....................
9....................
10 ...................
1 1 ...................

38
26
29
18
13
6
3
2

T fin

$5,
less
than
$10.

$10,
less
than
$15.

$15,
less
than
$20.

$20,
less
than
$25.

20

21

18

4
2
6
5
1

3
6
6
2
2
1
1

6
3

4
2
2

2

4
3

1
1

$25,
less
than
$30.

$30,
less
than
$35.

17

9

11

3

8

4

20

3
5
5
i
3

4

3
1

2
1

1

2

10

1
1

1
3
2

$35,
less
$40.

$40
Not
No
and
reweekly
over. ported. income.

2

T a b l e 2 u .— R a c i n e a n d S p r i n g f i e l d : N u m b e r o f c h i l d r e n i n f a m i l i e s i n w h i c h t h e a v e r a g e
m o n th ly re so u rc e s d u r in g f a th e r 's u n e m p lo y m e n t w e re s p e c ifie d p e r c e n ta g e s o f r e c e ip ts
p r i o r to u n e m p lo y m e n t, b y a g e o f c h ild .

Children in families in which resources during unemployment repre­
sented specified percentage of receipts previous to unemployment.
Age o f child.
Total 10-14 per 15-24 per 25-49 per 50-74 per 75-99 per 100 per
cent and
children.
cent.
cent.
cent.
cent.
cent.
over.
Total..................................
Under 1 year...............................
1 year...........................................
2 years.........................................
3 years.........................................
4 years.........................................
5 years.........................................
6 years.........................................
7 years.........................................
8 years......................................... •
9 years..........................................
10 years........................................
11 years...................................... .
12 years........................................
13 years........................................
14 years........................................
15 years........................................
16 years........................................
17 years........................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

203

6

12
14
13
17
10
20
14
12
15
15
10
10
10
9
7
6
3
6

2
1
2
i

13

1
1
2
3
2
1
2

82

78

8

2

12

12

1

1

6

6

3

6
6
6

3

3
2
1
2

4
5

5

7
2
3

£

156

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

T able 26.— R a c i n e :

A v e ra g e m o n th ly re so u rces d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t
b u d g e t r e q u ir e m e n ts f o r f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n .1

and

e s tim a te d

Families of unemployed men.1
Monthly budget estimate.

Average monthly resources during
unemployment.
Total.

Total...................................................

$75,less
than
$100.
4

126
4
32
46
28
11
2
3

1
2
1

$100, less $125,less $150,less $175,less
than
than
than
than
$200.
$175.
$125.
$150.
60

40

21

2
14
27
13
1
1
2

1
10
10
12
6

1
7
7
2
3
1

1

1

1

1 Includes only families for which average monthly receipts were reported.

T able 27.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

A v e r a g e m o n th ly re so u rc e s d u r in g u n e m p lo y m e n t a n d e s tim a te d
b u d g e t r e q u ir e m e n ts f o r f a m ilie s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n .1

Families of unemployed men.1
Monthly budget estimate.

Average monthly resources
during unemployment.
Total.

T o ta l................................

$75,less
than
$100.

$100, less $125,less $150,less $175, less $200, less
than
than
than
than
than
$200.
$225.
$175.
$150.
$125.

60

1

27

2
11
17
19
8
2
1

1

1
7
11
7
1

21

8

2

1

4
4
9
2
2

2
3
3

2

1

1 Includes only families for which average monthly receipts were reported.

T able 28.— R a c i n e :

I n te r v a l e la p s in g b e tw e e n b e g in n in g o f u n e m p lo y m e n t a n d r e c e iv in g
c h a r ita b le a id , b y p r e v io u s w o r k s ta tu s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n .

Unemployed fathers.
Interval elapsing before receiving charitable aid.

Skilled and
semiskilled Unskilled
workers.1
workers.

Total.

1 Includes 2 fathers who were casual laborers.
2 Includes 1 father whose work status was not reported.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2 231

170

61

2 141

102

38

6
33
42
*19
12
6
23

4
23
32
14
9
4
16

2
10
10
4
3
2
7

90

68

22

157

A P P E N D IX A — T A B L E S .
T a b l e 2D.— S p r i n g f i e l d : I n t e r v a l e l a p s i n g

b e tw e e n b e g in n in g o f u n e m p lo y m e n t
r e c e iv in g c h a r ita b le a id , b y p r e v io u s w o r k s ta tu s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n .

and

Unemployed fathers.
Interval elapsing before receiving charitable aid.
Total.

Skilled
and
Unskilled
semiskilled workers.1
workers.

Total...........................

3 135

I ll

21

Receiving charitable aid___

3 50

39

9

Less than 1 month.........
1 -2 months......................
3-5 months......................
6-8 months......................
9-11 months................... .
Interval not reported__

35
4
6
5
2
28

4
2
6
3
2
22

2

Not receiving charitable aid.

85

72

12

2

5

1 Includes 2 fathers who were casual laborers.
3 Includes 1 father whose work status was not reported.

T able 30.— R a c i n e :

A m o u n t a n d d u r a tio n o f c h a r ita b le a i d r e c e iv e d b y f a m il i e s o f
u n e m p lo y e d m e n .1

Families receiving charitable aid.

Amount of charitable aid.
Total.

12
2 weeks,
1-2
3-5
6-8
9-11
months Not re­
less than
months.
months.
months.
months.
and
ported.
1 month.
over.

Total..............................

141

3

11

Less than $10..........................
$10, less than $15.....................
$15, less than $25.....................
$25’ less than $50.....................
$50) less than $75.....................
$75, less than $100...................
$100, less than $150.................
$150, less than $200.................
$200 and over..........................
Amount not reported.............
Clothing and other aid...........

11
6
12
17
13
11
18
9
17
19
8

1

2
3
2
i

1

1

2
1

1 Excludes 90 families which received no charitable aid.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

16

4
2
4

1
i

19

58

1

1

2
1
4
3
1
1
1
4
i

g
7
2
14
7
7
6

12

22

1

3
1
4

158

UNEMPLOYMENT AND CHILD WELFARE.

T able 31.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

A m o u n t a n d d u r a tio n o f c h a r ita b le a i d r e c e iv e d b y f a m i l i e s o f
u n e m p lo y e d m e n .1

Families receiving charitable aid.

.

Duration of charitable aid.
Amount of charitable aid.
Total.

Total..............................

50

Less than $10..........................

5
1
6
2
5
2
2
7
16
3
1

12
2 weeks,
1 -2
3-5
6-8
9-11
months Not re­
less than months.
and
ported.
months. months. months.
1 month.
over.
2

5

6

1
1

1

4
2
1
4

1

1

1
1
1
2
2

28

1

1
1

2

3

4

2

1

i
1

1
1

4
12
1

1 Excludes 85 families which received no charitable aid.

T able 32.— R a c i n e :

A v e r a g e n u m b e r o f w o r k in g h o u r s p e r w e e k f o r m o th e r s w h o w o r k e d
d u r i n g f a t h e r ’s u n e m p l o y m e n t , b y t y p e o f w o r k a n d p l a c e o f e m p l o y m e n t .

W orking mothers.
Average hours per week.

Type of work and whether at
home or away from home.
Total.

Less than
12 hours.

24-35
hours.

36-47
hours.

48-59
hours.

Not
reported.

10

Total.
Working away from home.

12-23
hours.

31

52

Work by the day.................
Laundry work............. .
Cleaning.........................
L a u n d r y work and
cleaning.................... .
Genera 1housework
Not reported................ .
Factory work......................
Sewing................................ .
Practical nursing...............
Chamber work in hotel___
Restaurant work...............
Other.................. ................

20
11

Vi
*1
<4
1
1
2

*2
«2

il

11

Working at home.
Sewini
sewing................
Laundry work----Keeping store......
Weaving rag rugs.
1 One mother also cares for neighbor’s boy.
2 Also does washing at home.
* One mother also keeps lodgers.
i One mother also does sewing at home.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1

82

6 One mother also does cleaning by the day.
« Works in “ Old clothes room” at relief agency.
i Picking beans.
8 Pulling beets.

159

A P P E N D IX A .-----TA B L ES.

T able 33.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

A v e r a g e n u m b e r o f w o r k in g h o u r s p e r w e e k f o r m o th e r s w h o
w o r k e d d u r in g f a th e r 's u n e m p lo y m e n t, b y ty p e o f w o r k a n a p la c e o f e m p lo y m e n t.

Working mothers.
Average hours per week.

Type of work and whether at home
or away from home.
Total.

Less
12-23
24-35
than 12 hours.
hours.
hours.

36-47
hours.

hours Not re­
48-59 60and
hours. over.
ported.

Total...........................................

50

4

11

7

6

7

2

13

Working away from home..................

39

1

11

7

6

7

2

5

Work by the day..........................
Laundry work........................
Cleaning..................................
Laundry work and cleaning..
General housework.................
Not reported...........................
Factory work................................
Practical nursing...........................
Sewing............. 7...........................
Clerical work.................................
Pantry work in hotel....................
Kitchen work in hotel..................
Not reported..................................

27
3
5
9
9
1
3
3
2
1
1
1
1

1

11
12
3
3
2
1

7
1
1
3
*2

3

1

11

3

6
4
1

3

R a c in e

2

Ì
1

1
1

1
1

Sewing...........................................
Laundry work..............................
Baking "bread.................................

T able 34.—

i

2J

1

Working at home................................

i One mother also sews at home.

1

2
1

1
1

2 One mother also does laundry work at home.

a n d S p r in g f ie ld : E m p l o y m e n t o f m o th e r s d u r in g
p e r io d o f f a th e r s , b y p la c e o f e m p lo y m e n t.

u n e m p lo y m e n t

Mothers employed.
Place of mother’s employment.
Total.

Before and
During
during
unemploy­
unemploy­ ment of
ment of
father but
father.
not before.

Total......................................................................

116

26

At home............................................................. ..............

25
84
7

19


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

90
20

160

T a ble 3 5 R a c in e : S c h o o l g ra d e o f c h ild r e n o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y a g e a n d se x .
Children attending school.
Grade at time of study.
Age and sex.

Total.................
rs...........................

High school.
Kinder­
garten.

First.

Third.

Second.

Sixth.

Fifth.

Seventh.

Eighth.

Second
year.

First
year.

508

48

94

74

60

47

48

53

35

22

7

254

27

44

42

33

21

22

20

18

14

3

7

7
20

3
13
14
g
3
1

1
6
12
11
3

254
4 yeais..................

50

5
12

1

32

2

2

1

16
8

2

8
5
8
1

27

26

26

1
9
7
6
2
1

3
5
12
4
2

1

1
1
2
6
6
3
1

1
2
11
2
2

33

17

1
11
7
9
4
1

1
8
5
3

2
5
2
4
1
8

3
1
1
1

3
1
1
4

i

1

8

1
9
7
i
i

22
12
$

1
4
g
2
5
1

21

i

Not
reported.

Fourth
year.

Third
year.

1

14
7


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Fourth.

1
14
7
3
1
i

1
1
1
4
1
1
1

2
2

i

1

1
1
2
1
1

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

Total.

T a b l e 36.— S p r i n g f i e l d : S c h o o l g r a d e o f c h i l d r e n o f u n e m p l o y e d m e n , b y a g e a n d s e x .

Children attending school.
Grade at time of study.
Age and sex.

I
Total.

High school.
Kinder­
garten.

6 years..
7 years..
8 years..
9 years..
10 years.
11 years.
12 years.
13 years.
14 years.
15 years.
16 years.
17 years.
Girls.
6 years..
7 years..
8 years..
9 years..
10 years.
1 1 years.
12 years.
13 years..
14 years..
15 years..
16 years..
17 years..


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

275

1

Second.

Third.

Fourth.

Fifth.

Sixth.

Seventh.

Eighth.
First
year.

Second
year.

22

43

30

41

36

28

17

25

12

6

138

11

22

18

21

17

13

9

13

4

3

10
21
13
16
18
15
11
12
7
7
5
3

5
6

5
9
3
2
3

6
6
1
1
2

5
6
4
1

6
3
1
2

1

2
4
5
1
1

1

137

1

il

21

13
18
16
13
16
7
19
15
Ll
4
3
2

1

4
7

8
8
4
1

12

5
2
3

20

19

5
7 ............ 2*
4
7
5
3
5

15

2
2
3
1
1

8

2
5
3 ...........i' ...............
3
1
1
1
1
2
12

........... ...........
2
2
6
5

2
3
2
1

8

...........
1
7
3
1

3

Third
year.

Fourth
year.
1

3

10

1

6

2

..........

............
1

1

1

2
1

2

4

2
1

................ ...............

1
5
2

Not
reported.

1
1
1

1

A P P E N D IX A . ----- TABLES.

Total children.
Boys.

First.

162

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L E A E E .

T able 37.—

R a c in e a n d S p r in g f ie ld : A m o u n t o f w e e k ly e a r n in g s o f w o r k in g c h ild r e n o f
u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y a g e a r id se x .

Working children.
We ekly eamiiigs.
Age and sex.
Total.

$10,
Less than less$5,
than less than
$5.
$10.
$15.

$15
and
over.

Wage
not
reported.

Total......... .........................................

45

4

15

17

5

4

Boys................. ......................... - ................

27

2

6

12

4

3

16 years..................................................
17 years..................................................

8
10
9

1
1

14
1
1

12
«5
85

12
2

U
U
il

Girls..............................................................

18

2

9

5

11

1

5
6
7

1
1

4
3
2

1
34

1

1

1 One not working at time of agent’s visit.
2 Two not working at time of agent’s visit.
8 Three not working at time of agent’s visit.

T able 38.— R a c i n e :

O c c u p a tio n o f w o r k in g c h ild r e n d u r in g f a th e r 's u n e m p lo y m e n t, a n d
tim e o f b e g in n in g w o r k , b y a g e a n a sex .

Working children.

Latest occupation and time
of beginning work.

Girls.

Boys.
Total
Total.

16
17
15
years years years
of age. of age. of age.

Total.

6

12

1

3

22

10

Beginning work
before
father’s unemployment. . .

9

6

1

5

Office boy or girl..............
Telephone operator.........
Apprentice—garage.........
Factory worker..............
Occupation not reported.

3
i
1
3
1

2

1

H

12

3

Total.............................

Beginning work dining
father’s unemployment—
Housemaid......................
Office boy or g irl...........
Telephone operator.........
Sales girl.........................
Factory worker...............

2
3
i
i
5

Not reported..........................
Factory worker...............

1
1

i
2
1

i
i
1
1

i One not working at time of agent’s visit.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1
12
il
1
1

5

5

3

1

2

1
1

1

2
1
1
1
4

il
il
1
il

2

1
1

1

9

2

16
17
15
years years years
of age. of age. of age.

2

4
2
1

2

U

3

1
1
U

163

A P P E N D IX A .— TA B L ES.

T a b l e 39 — S p r i n g f i e l d : O c c u p a t i o n o f w o r k i n g c h i l d r e n d u r i n g f a t h e r ' s u n e m p l o y m e n t
a n d tim e o f b e g in n in g w o r k , b y a g e a n d sex .

Working children.
Boys.

Latest occupation and time
of beginning work.
Total.
Total.

Girls.

15
16
17
years years
years
of age. of age. of age.

Total.

Total.............................

23

17

7

7

3

6

Beginning
work
before
father’s unemployment___

12

11

3

6

2

1

Errand boy......................
Telegraph messenger......
Factory worker...............
Machinist’s apprentice...
Occupation not reported.

1
1
7
1
2

1
1
6
1
2

. !2

2

1

il

1
U
2
1
il

Beginning work during
father’s unemployment___

10

5

4

1

1
2

2

2

Housemaid......................
Messenger........................
Seamstress alteration in
department store.........
Salesman.........................
Laundry operative.........
Factory worker...............
Clerical worker................
Machinist ’s apprentice...

1
1
1
2
1
1

1

1

1

1

Not reported.........................
Printer.............................

1
1

1
1

1 Not working at time of agent ’s visit.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1

5

1

1
1

15
16
17
years years years
of age. of age. of age.
3

1

2
1

3

i

1

i
i
1

1
1

1

1

164

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

T able 40.—

R a c in e a n d S p r in g f ie ld : T im e o f b e g in n in g w o r k a n d g ra d e i n
w o r k in g c h ild r e n o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y a g e a n d se x .

sch o o l o f

Working children.

Who left school at completing specified grade.
Age, sex, and time of
beginning work.

High
school.

Total.
Sev­ Eighth.
Total. Fourth. enth.

21

6

1

3

11

4

1

2

11

11
1

45

38

1

Beginning to work
before father’s un­
employment...........

21

20
W

IT
3
7
7

3
7
7

4

3

Grade
Sev­
not re­ Total. enth. Eighth.
Sec­
ported
First ond
year. year.

6

Total................

Boys....................

Who left school
while enrolled in
specified grade.

1

9~
t1
3
«5

4

1

=

3

4

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Not re­
ported
when
left
school.

2

3

2

3

r
il

i2
2

2*

17 years.........

1
3

3

1

2

Beginning to work
during father’s un­
employment...........

22

16

2

9

2

3

1

8

6

5

1

1

1

1

5
3

3
3

2
s3

1

1

*1

1

14

10

4

1

Girls....................

2

5
5
4

4
3
3

2

16 years.........

Boys (17 years)...

2
2

.2
2

1
11

1 One not working at time of agent’ s visit.
a Three not working at time of agent’s visit.
8 Two not working at time of agent’s visit.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2
1
1

1

1

1

1

2

2
1
i1

2
2

1
1
4 Remained in school half time,
BGraduated from an academy

2
12

2
1

si

APPENDIX A.---- TABLES.
T able 41.

R a c in e

165

a n d S p r in g f ie ld : L e n g th o f tim e s in c e le a v in g
c h ild r e n o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y a g e a n d se x .

sc h o o l o f w o r k in g

Working children.
Length of time since leaving school.
Age and sex.
Total.

36
Less
6-11
12-17
18-23
24-29
30-35 months Not re­
than 6
months. months. months. months. months. months. and ported.
over.

Total...................

45

4

10

3

11

Boys.............................

27

2

4

2

9

15 years..................
16 years..................
17 years..................

8
10
9

12

^3
1

2

11
85
83

Girls.............................

18

2

6

1

2

15 years..................
16 years..................
17 years..................

5
6
7

2

1
13
2

1

_____

1

5

3

4

2

1

1

2

i
no^working at time of agent’s visit.
s One remainedin school half time.

4
12

2
12 .
1

8

4

il

3Two not working at time of agent’s visit

T able 42.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

E m p lo y m e n t s ta tu s F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 2 2 , o f c h ild r e n w h o s e f i r s t
e m p lo y m e n t c e r tific a te s w e re is s u e d s u b s e q u e n t to M a y i , 1 9 2 1 , b y a g e a n d se x .

Total
children.

Age and sex.

Total.....................................

14 years......................................
15 years...............................
Girls....................................
14vears.......................................
15 years..................................

Children Children
emnot em-

iSt
IS?
1922.
1922.

155

122

33

67

49

18

31
36

25
24

6
12

88

73

15

34
54

29
44

5
10

T able 43.

S p r in g f ie ld : L e n g th o f tim e s in c e o r ig in a l e m p lo y m e n t c e r tific a te w a s is s u e d
to c h ild r e n w h o r e c e iv e d c e r tific a te s s u b s e q u e n t to M a y 1 , 1 9 2 1 , b u t w h o w e re n o t a t w o r k
F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 2 2 ; b y a m o u n t o f tim e w o r k e d .

Children who worked specified amount of time.
since original permit
was issued.

Total.

Total................

133

Less than 1 m onth...
1 month.....................
2 months........ ..........
3 months....................
4 months....................
5 months....................
6 months....................
7 months....................
8 months....................

11
2
3
3
12
3
2
2
5

Less
than 1
month.

1
month.

2
months.

3
months.

4

5

5

9

1
1
1
1

1
1
1

1

2

2
1
1

1Includes 1 child for whom amount of time was not reported.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1
7

4
5
months. months.
5

2

7
months.
2

2
1
1
1

. . . . .. . .. .

166

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

T able 44.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

N u m b e r o f jo b s h e ld a n d to ta l a m o u n t o f tim e c h ild h a d w o r k e d
p r i o r to F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 2 2 ; c h ild r e n w ith e m p lo y m e n t c e r tific a te s u n e m p lo y e d F e b r u a r y
1, 1922.

Unemployed children who had had specified number of jobs.
Total amount of time child
had worked.

Total.................................
,
IiOsb tlidii 1 montn>. .................

109

58

15
13
19
18
10
6
5
3
6
4
2
1
3
1
3

14
u
11
9
2

24

1

1

13

12

10

8

4

3

2

1

Total.

1
2
7
5
5
2

3
1
1
1
2

1
1
1
2
1
2
3
2

3
2
2
1

1
1

1

1
1

1

1

1

1

2

T able 45.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

G r a d e c o m p le te d b y c h ild r e n b e tw e e n 1 4 a n d 1 6 y e a r s o f a g e to
w h o m e m p lo y m e n t c e r tific a te s h a d b e e n is s u e d b u t w h o w e re n o t a t w o r k F e b r u a r y 1 }
1 9 2 2 , b y a g e a n d se x .

Children who had completed specified grade.
Age and sex.
Total. Fourth. Fifth.

Sixth. Seventh Eighth. Ninth.

4

4

1

3

1
3

1

1
2

12

5

3

1

2
10

5

3

1

4

4

23

27

34

— ....

76.

3

3*

18~

22~

22~

15 years............................

7
69

3

1
2

2
16

2
20

22

Girls................ .......................

33

1

1

5

5

15 years............................

5
28

1

1

1
4

2
3

Total............................
Boys................. .


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

109

First Grade
year
high not re­
school. ported.

9
T

APPENDIX A.----TABLES.

167

T able 46.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

L e n g th o f e m p lo y m e n t h is to r y o f c h ild r e n b e tw e e n 1 4 a n d 1 6
y e a r s q f a g e to w h o m e m p lo y m e n t c e r tific a te s h a d b e e n is s u e d b u t w h o w e re n o t a t w o r k
F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 2 2 , b y a m o u n t o f tim e w o r k e d i n a l l p o s itio n s .

Unemployed children who had worked.
Total amount of time worked in all positions.

Length of employment
history.

Total Less
11 Not
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 mos. re­
than Imo 2
mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. and port­
Imo.
over. ed.
Total.............

109

Less than 1 month.
1 month..................
2 months.................
3 months............... .
4 months.................
5 months.................
6 months.................
7 months.................
8 months.................
9 months.................
14 months...............
15 months...............
16 months...............
17 months...............
18 months...............
19 months...............
20 m onths.............
21 months...............
22 months...............
23 months...............

1
2
3
2
12
3
1
2
5
1
3
8
15

15
1
1
1

19

18

10

2

7

2
1

1
1

1

1
4
3
1

6
17
7
4
4
1

1
1

i
1
1
2

2
1

6

5

3

6

4

2

5

3

1
1
2

1
1

2
2
1
2

2
3
1
2
1
3

1

1
1

4
1
1

1
1

1
1
1
1

2

2
1
2

1

1

1

1

1
1

2
1

1

2 Worked 15 months.

1
1

13
«1
»1

1

1

1 Worked 14 months.

T able 47.

13

1

1Worked 11 months.

S p r i n g f i e l d : P e r i o d o f r e s id e n c e i n th e c i t y , o f u n e m p l o y e d m e n
g iv e n c i t y w o r k , b y c o u n tr y o f b ir th .

w h o w ere

Unemployed men given city work.
Period of residence in city.
Country of birth.
Total.
than 1 1 to 4
year. years.

5 to 9
years.

20
10 to 14 15 to 19 years
years. years.
and
over.

Notreported.

Total___

663

7

164

180

101

64

92

52

3

Native............. .
Foreign born ...
Italy...........
Canada.......
Poland.......
Greece........
Ireland.......
Syria..........
Russia........
Armenia__
Sweden......
England___
Austria.......
Scotland___
West Indies
Turkey.......
All other1..

317
346
158
43
22
21
18
13
13
11
10

2
5
2
1

91
73
30
6
7
8

70
110
52
11
5
10
3
5
9
6
3
2
1

35
66
32
8
8
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
1
1

28
36
17
4
1
1
2
1

37
55
25
12
1

‘52

2

3

2

2

5
4
3
9

1
1

3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2

2
2
2
1
1

1

10
1
2
2
2

2 /n Lithuania™ 311 b° m in Czechoslovakia>1 in Palestine, 1 in Portugal, 2 in Finland, 2 in Germany, and

49090°— 23------ 12


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

/
168

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

T able 48.— S p r i n g f i e l d :

P r e v io u s w e e k ly w a g e s o f u n e m p lo y e d m e n , b y le n g th o f u n e m ­
p lo y m e n t b e fo re a p p lic a tio n f o r c ity w o r k .

Unemployed men given city work.
Length of unemployment before applying for work.
Weekly wages be­
fore unemployment.
Total.

Total...............
$10, less than $15...
$15, less than $20. ..
$20, less than $25...
$25, less than $30...
$30, less than $35...
$35 and over...........
Not reported..........

663
14
66
168
161
90
84
80


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

12
Less
6 to 11 months Not re­
5
4
3
2
1
than l
ported.
month. month. months. months. months. months. months. and
over.
126

104

82

59

53

33

162

40

4

3
16
43
18
12
12
22

1
12
28
27
. 7
9
20

4
13
16
23
7
8
11

2
3
14
15
9
10
6

3
6
15
19
4
5
1

1
2
11
10
2
5
2

10
33
44
42
21
12

3
7
5
5
14
6

1

1

2

APPEN D IX B .— F O R M S USED IN TH E STU D Y.
FO RM 1.
U . S. D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,

Current—

Ch il d r e n ’s B u r e a u .

Last date—

Cont. A ssn.—

Poor Office—

U N E M P L O Y M E N T CASE.
N am e:

U nem pl. began:
Occupation:

Address:
A ge :

Date first applic. :

R ace:

Birthplace:

Citizen: Y

N

Y rs. U . S .— Speaks E ng. —

W ork Secured Through E m ploym ent Office.

Wages.
Date.

Occupation.

Total
time.

Remarks.
Weekly.

Total.

«

169


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

170

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .
FORM

2.

[Page EJ
N um ber

U . S. D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,
C h il d r e n ’ s B u r e a u .

Date of visit

UNEM PLOYM ENT A N D DEPEN DEN CY.
Father’s last regular em ploym ent:

Wages:

Date unem ploym ent began:

Cause:

Nationality: Father—

Citizenship: Y

Mother

Length of tim e father in U . S .:
Literacy of father: reads

In city :

writes

E n g.

A ge: Father—
N.L.

N

Mother—

Speaks English: Y

N

Children:
Left school.
Name.

Date of
birth.

Age. Grade.

Grade
compì.

Occupa­
tion.

Industry.

Wages.

Date.

Date
began
•work.

£1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Others living with the fam ily:
Total in hom e:
H om e owned: Y

N o. rooms—
N

Mortgaged: Y
M o. interest:

Used for sleeping
N

B a t h .Y

Length of tim e in house:
R en t: Present—
During e m p l.

Character of dwelling and neighborhood:
A gent:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Informant: A gency—

N

M o.—

Fa.—

APPENDIX B — POEMS USED IN THE STUDY.

171

F O R M 2— Continued.
[Page 2.]
R E S O U R C E S O F F A M I L Y D U R IN G U N E M P L O Y M E N T O F F A T H E R .
Temporary work of father:
T ype of work:

Current em pl. Of. case: Y

A m ount of time em ployed (proportion):

Earnings (daily or w eekly rate):
Total earnings since “ date unem ploym ent began” :
Em ploym ent of mother: Before un e m p l.:

Present tim e:

A t home:
A w a y from hom e:
Tim e per day or week:
Average w eekly earnings:
Care of children:

T yp e of work:
Total earnings during unem ploym ent:

E m ploym ent of children:

Other sources of income:
1. Existing before unem ploym ent of father:

2. A dd ed during period of unem ploym ent:
(A id from relatives; sold house; rental of house; boarders, etc.)

Charitable aid:

Total w eekly income of fam ily at tim e of inquiry:
Approxim ate total income during period of unem ploym ent:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

N

U N E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C H IL D W E L F A R E .

172

F O R M 2— Continued.
|Page 3.]
S P E C IA L N O T E S .
(Handicaps and retrenchment during unem ploym ent period.)
1, Father’s work status:
Regularly em ployed at trade (name trade)

#

Unskilled worker, hu t usually steadily empl —
Casual laborer, frequently unem ployed—
Is unem ploym ent due to physical d isability: (Nature of dis.)

\
Serious illnesses during unem pl. period: health of mother and children.

3.

Children committed to institutions: (for permanent custody or temporary care).

Losses due to unpaid installments on furniture, unpaid mortgage interest, in­
surance premiums, etc.

Probable permanent loss of industrial standing

through long period of unem ploym ent.

5

Credit and debts:
During unem ploym ent period; debts b y item s; extent to w hich credit at stores
has tided fam ily through.

6. R eduction in standard of living:
Housing, food, comforts, recreation, etc.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

A P P E N D IX B .-----FO R M S USED I N

•

173

T H E STUDY.

FO RM 3.
IT. S. D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,
Ch i l d r e n ’ s B u r e a u .
RECO R D OF F A M IL Y R E L IE F .
N am e:

.

A gency:

Address:

R ent:

F a t h e r : Occupation—

Age—

Date unem pl. began—

Race—

Birthplace—

C h i l d r e n i n h o m e : (Ages) Under 14—
M o t h e r w o r h i n g : A t home—

Citizen: Y

14 and over—
W k ’g—
A w a y from home—

N

U nem p l.—

Others in fam ily:
Total income at ap p lic.; Date—

Incom e and sources—

Date first applic. to agency:

Date unem pl. applic.—

A ctive case prior to present u n em p l.: 1916—
Dates and amounts of relief:

1917—

1918—

1919—

1920—

FO RM 4.
U . S. D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,
Ch il d r e n ’ s B u r e a u .
D A Y N U R S E R Y CASE.

Cent. Assn, case: Y
Sched. fam ily case: Y

N am e:

Address:

Special visit case: Y

F a t h e r : Previous occupation:

Unem pl. began:

C h i l d r e n i n h o m e : Ages—

In school—

Children cared for b y day nursery: Ages—

T em p, work:
W orking—
D aily charge:

Periods of care:
E m p l o y m e n t o f m o th e r :

FO RM 5.
U . S. D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r ,
C h il d r e n ’ s B u r e a u .

Date—

M E N A P P R O V E D F O R C I T Y W O R K — S P R IN G F IE L D .
D ate of application—

A ge of father—

Birthplace—

Years in Springfield—

W h en last employed—
Wages—

Occupation—
W ife employed—

Ages of children—
A ges of working children—
Social data—

FO RM 6.
C H IL D E N R O L L E D I N C O N T IN U A T IO N S C H O O L.
Date:
S ex—

Date of birth—

Date left school—

Date original permit—
Grade completed—
Date leaving last em pi.—

Date began work—
A ctivities while unem ployed:

FO RM 7.
Date:
C E R T IF IC A T E
S ex—

C H IL D — N O T E M P L O Y E D .

Date of birth—

Date original certif.—

Date left school—

Grade completed—

N ow in school?

Grade—

D ate began work—

Date leaving last em pi.—

Jobs held, length of tim e in each:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

o

N
N
N


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis