Full text of Statistical Atlas of the United States, 1920 : Statistical Atlas of the United States, 1920

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
HERBERT HOOVER,

Sec reta ry

BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
W. M.

Ste u a r t,

Director

STATISTICAL ATLAS
OF THE

UNITED STATES




Prepared under the supervision of
CHARLES S. SLOANE
Geographer of the Census

W ASH IN G TO N
G O VE R N M EN T PR IN T IN G OFFICE
1925

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
D e p a r t m e n t of Co m m erce ,
B u r e a u of t h e C en su s ,

Washington, D. C., June 7, 192J+.
Si

r

:

I transmit herewith the Statistical Atlas of the United States. This volume con­
tains the maps and diagrams used for illustrating the reports of the Fourteenth Census,
as well as a number of illustrations which have been prepared and published in the
special and annual reports of the Bureau of tire Census.
The text and illustrations comprising this volume were prepared under the super­
vision of Charles S. Sloane, Geographer of the Census.
Respectfully,
W. M . S t e u a r t ,
Director o f the Censns.
H on. H e r b e r t H o o v e r ,

Secretary of Commerce.
ii




CONTENTS.
P age.

Area enumerated at the Fourteenth Census----------------------------------------------------------------------------Area of enumeration_____________________________________________________________________
Geographic divisions_____________________________________________________________________
Centers and median lines_________________________________________
Center of population___________________________________________
Median lines____________________________________________________ - __ _ . ______________
Median point__________________________ _______________ __ __ __ . . . _______________
____ . _ _________
Centers of population of states_________________________________
Center of—
Area________________________________________________________
.
. ______ ____
Foreign-horn population________________ ___________
___
..
___________
Negro population________________________________________________ ____ . ____________
Urban and rural population_______________________________
_
Agriculture___________________________________________
. . . ______________
Manufactures________________________________________________________________________

3
3
6
7
7
10
11
11
17
17
18
19
20
23

PLATES.
(Titles descriptive of the plates shown are arranged by subjects on the pages indicated below.

See also index.)

Agriculture (Plates 239-341)__________________________________________________________________
Drainage (Plates 294-322)________________________________________________________________
Irrigation (Plates 323-341)___________
Cotton (Plates 362-374)__________________
Encumbered homes (Plates 375-389)_________ ____
_____ _______ ______________
. _____________
Manufactures (Plates 342-350) _ _______ ___ . .
Mines and quarries (Plates 351-361)___________ .
. ... .
__ ___________
Population (Plates 1-238)__________________________
.. . .. . .. ------------------Occupations (Plates 223-238)_______________ _____ .
. _______ ___________________
Statistics of cities (Plates 392-395)___________________
. . _.... ..
. ____ ________________
Statistics of states (Plates 390-391)_____________________
___ .. _ --------- . ------------------------Vital statistics (Plates 396-412)________________________________________________
Births (Plates 396-397)__________________________________________________________________
Deaths (Plates 398-412). _ . .............. _ . _____ _______ . — - _ . ----------------------- ------ ---------Index




to

il l u s t r a t io n s

_________________________________________________

269
272
272
401
417
375
387
25
29
439
435
445
446
446
465

in







STATISTICAL ATLAS




STATISTICAL ATLAS
AREA ENUMERATED AT THE FOURTEENTH CENSUS.
A R E A O F E N U M E R A T IO N .

The area of enumeration in 1920 embraced the
United States proper and the outlying possessions of
Alaska, Hawaii, Porto Rico, Guam, Samoa, and the
Panama Canal Zone. No provision was made in the
Fourteenth Census Act for the enumeration of the
Philippine Islands, a census of those islands having
been taken by the Philippine government as of
December 31, 1918, nor of the Virgin Islands, for
which a special enumeration was made as of Novem­
ber 1, 1917. The gross area of the territory under the
jurisdiction of the United States in 1920 was 3,738,­
371 square miles, and its population 117,823,165, as
shown in Table 1. The population was as returned at
the Fourteenth Census, taken as of January 1, 1920,
for the United States proper and all of the outlying
possessions except the Philippine Islands and the
Virgin Islands, enumerations of their population
being made at the dates specified above.
T able 2

In Table 2 is given the gross area in square miles of
the United States, including all its outlying posses­
sions, at each enumeration from 1790 to 1920, together
with the population; the area— land, water, and
total— and the population of the United States,
excluding the outlying possessions; and the gross
area of the outlying possessions.
Table I

Gross area
(land and
water in
sq. miles).

T E R R IT O R Y E N U M E R A T E D ! 1920.

Population.

3, 738,371

105,710, 620
11,995,307

586,400
75
206
6,406
' 527
114,400
3,435
133

.........................................................
Outlying possessions

117,823,165

3,026, 789
711, 582

55, 036
8,056
13, 275
255, 912
22, 858
i 10,314, 310
1,299,809
* 26, 051
117,238

i Philippine census, Dec. 31, 1918.

* Census, N ov 1,1917.

UN ITED STATES AND ITS OUTLYIN G POSSESSIONS.

United States (excluding outlying possessions).
CENSUS Y E A R .

Aggregate
population.

i Gross area
Per cent j
| (land and
o f area in !
! water) in
1920. |
; square miles.

3, 738, 371
3, 738, 238 |
3, 737, 7
3,613, 189 1
3, 613, 189;

Population.

1920.
1910.
1900­
1890
1880.

117,823, 165
101,118, 347
77, 256, 630
62,979, 766
50,189, 209

96. 6

105, 710, 620
91,972, 266
75,994, 575
62,947, 714
50,155, 783

1870.
1800.
1850­
1840
1830.

38,558,371
31,443, 321
23,191,876
17, 069, 453
12,866,020

3,613,
3, 026,
2,997,
1,792,
1,792,

189 '
789 l
119 j
223
223

96. 6
80. 9
80. 1
47. 9
47. 9

38, 558, 371
31,443, 321
23.191, 876
17, 069, 453
12,866, 020

1820.
1810
1800.
1790.

9,638,453
7,239,881
5, 308, 483
3,929, 214

1,792,
1,720,
892,
892,

223
122 1
135 i
135

47 9
46. 0
23. 8
23. 8

100. 0
100. 0

1 100. 0 1
96. 6

Gross area
of outlying
possessions
in square
miles.

Area in square miles.

9,638,
7,239,
5,308,
3,929,

453
881
483
214

Gross area
(land and
water).

1

Per cent
of area in
1920.

3.020, 789
3,026, 789
3.020, 789
3.020, 789
3.020, 789
3,026, 789
3,026,789
2,997,119
1,792, 223
1.792.223
1.792.223
1, 720, 122
892, 135
892, 135

100. 0
10 0
0.

Land.

Water.1

2,973, 776
2.973, 890
2.974, 159
2.973.965
2.973.965

53,013
52,899
52, 630
52, 824
52.824

99.0
59. 2
59.2

2.973.965
2.973.965
2,944, 337
1.753, 588
1.753, 588

52.824
52.824
52,782
38.635
38.635

59.2
56.8
29. 5
29. 5

1.753, 588
1,685,865
867,980
867, 980

38.635 I
34,257 :
24, 155 j
24,155

100.0
100.0

100.0
100.0
100.0

1 Does not include water surface of oceans, Gulf of Mexico, or Great Lakes, lying within jurisdiction of the United States.




3

I
i
,
i

711,582
711,449
710,922
586, 400
586,400
586, 400

4

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

Table 3 gives the gross area with the date of annexa­
tion of each accession of territory from 1790 to 1920,
and per cent distribution of aggregate area and area
of the United States.
Plate No. 1 shows the boundaries of the original
13 states and each of the accessions of territory.
T able 3

GROSS A R E A (L A N D AN D
W A T E R ) IN S Q U A R E M ILES.

ACCESSION.

Date
ac­
quired.

P E R CENT
DISTRIBU TION .

Area
of the
United
States.

Total area.

Aggre­
gate
area.

A g g r e g a t e , 1920—United
States and outlying pos­
sessions................................

3,738,371

100.0

United States__________
Outlying possessions___

3,026,789
711, 582

81.0
19. 0

100.0

23.8
22.1
1.6
0.4
10.
7.7
14.1

29. 5
27.4
1.9
0.4
12.9
9.5
17.5

Territory in 1790»......
Louisiana Purchase...
Florida______________
B y treaty w ith Spain.
Texas........................... .
Oregon______ _______
Mexican Cession____
Gadsden Purchase....
Alaska_______________
H awaii...... .......... ........
Philippine Islands___
P orto R ico__________
G uam ........................ .
Samoa...........................
Panama Canal Zon e..
Virgin Islands of the United
States.

Area of
accession.

1803
1819
1819
1845
1846
1848
1853
1867
1898
1899
1899
1899
1900
1904

827,987
58,666
13.435
389,166
286,541
529,189
29,670
586.400
6,406
114.400
3.435
206
75
527

892, 135
1,720, 122
1,778, 788
1,792, 223
2,181, 389
2,467. 930
2,997, 119
3,026, 789
3,613, 189
3,619, 595
3,733,995
3.737, 430
3.737, 636
3,737,711
3.738, 238

(*
)
(*
)
(*
>

1917

133

3,738,371

(3
)

0.8
0.2

15.7

1.0

3. 1
0. 1

1 Includes drainage basin of the R ed River o f the North, not a part o f any acces­
sion, but in the past sometimes considered a part of the Louisiana Purchase.
1 Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.

The increase in population from 3,929,214 at the
census of 1790 to 117,823,165 at the census of 1920
was 113,893,951, or about 29 persons in 1920 to each
person returned at the First Census. During the
same period the area was extended from 892,135
square miles to 3,738,371 square miles. The area,
therefore, increased only four times, as compared
with a population increase of nearly twenty-nine fold.
The gross area, land and water, of the territory under
the jurisdiction of the United States at the Fourteenth
Census was 3,738,371 square miles. The outlying
territories had an area of 711,582 square miles, con­
stituting 19.0 per cent, or approximately one-fifth of the
total area.
In 1790, at the First Census, the area was 892,135
square miles, less than one-fourth of the present area,
and, with the exception of the territory known as




Florida, was confined to the territory lying between
the Atlantic Ocean and the Mississippi River, to­
gether with the drainage basin of the Red River of
the North. The largest accession of territory at any
decade was that of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.
During the decade from 1840 to 1850 there were three
accessions of territory, aggregating 1,204,896 square
miles, which, with the area of the Louisiana Purchase,
covered an area of over 2,000,000 square miles. The
annexations made in other years, with the exception
of Alaska, were smaller in area, but more densely
populated.
Table 4 shows at each census the population, accu­
mulative increase, per cent of increase from 1790,
land area, and number of persons per square mile for
the United States, exclusive of its outlying possessions.
The increase in population in 1840, after 50 years of
growth was 334.4 per cent, having increased a little
over four times. The increase for 100 years, to 1890,
was 1,502 per cent, or there were then in the United
States 16 persons where in 1790 there was one person.
The increase for 130 years, to 1920, was 2,590.4 per
cent; in other words, there were 27 persons in conti­
nental United States to each person returned in 1790.
The land area has increased almost three and onehalf times, while the population per square mile has
increased nearly eight times, the increase in density
from 1900 to 1910 being greater than during any other
decade. The increase and decrease in density of
population is represented b y Diagram 1, Plate No.
139.
The land area of each of the states and of the entire
United States is given in Table 5.
T able 4
CENSUS Y E A R .

1920.........................
1910.........................
1900.........................
1890.........................
1880_........................
1870.........................
1860.........................
1850.........................
1840.........................
1830..................
1820.........................
1810.........................
1800.........................
1790.........................
______________ f

Population of
Per cent
continental
Accumulative
o f in­
United
increase.
crease
States.
from 1790.
105,710,620
91,972,266
75,994,575
62,947, 714
50,155, 783
38,558, 371
31,443, 321
23,191, 876
17,069, 453
12,866, 020
9,638, 453
7,239, 881
5,308,483
3, 929, 214

101,781,406
88,043,052
72,065, 361
59,018, 500
46,226,569
34,629, 157
27,514, 107
19,262, 662
13,140, 239
8,936, 806
5, 709, 239
3,310, 667
1,379, 269

2,590.4
2,240. 7
1,834. 1
1,502. 0
1,176. 5
881. 3
700.2
490. 2
334. 4
227.4
145.3
84.3
35. 1

Land area
in square
miles.

2, 973, 776
2, 973, 890
2,974, 159
2,973, 965
2,973,965
2,973,965
2,973, 965
2,944. 337
1,753,588
1,753, 588
1,753, 588
1,685.865
867,980
867,980

Popula­
tion per
square
mile.
35.5
30.9
25.6
21.2
16.9
13.0
10.6
7.9
9.7
7.3
5.5
4.3
6.1
4.5

5

AREA OF ENUMERATION
T a b l e 5.— L A N D

ST A T E O R T E R R IT O R Y

United S tates...

A R E A OF T H E

1920

1910

U N IT E D STATES IN SQUARE
1790-1920.

1900

1890

1880

867,980

1790
8 867,980

51,279

52,525

105,275

4,820
1,965
58
54,861
5a 725

4,820
1,965
58
54,861
58,725

4,820
1,965
58
Mi 861
5a 725

4,820
1,965
90
54,861
58,725

4,820
1,965
90
54,861
5a 725

4,820
1,965
90
54,861
5 a 725

4,820
1,965
90

4,820
1,965
90

4,820
1,965

58,725

111,877

145,196

83,354
56,002
35,885
55,586
81,774

83,354
56,002
35,885
55,586
81,774

56,002
35,885
55,586
33 81,774

56,002
35,885
55,586

56,002
35,885
191,656

56,002
35,885

56,002
35,885

192,381
42,933

252,084

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40; 181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,041

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,041

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,041

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,041

40,181
34,065
38 29,895
9,941
8,041

40,181

1 40,181
8

18 29,895]
9,941
8,041

” 29,895
9,999
8,041

57,480
80,858
46,362
68,727
146,201

57,480
80,858
46,362
68,727
146,201

57,480
80,858
46,362
68,727
146,201

57,480
80,858
46,362
68,727
146,195

57,480
13 80,858
46.362
68,727

57,480
163,457
46,362
68,727

57,480

186,052

186,052

46,362
68,727

"46,362
65,618

"46,362

76,808
109,821
9,031
7,514
122,503

76,808
109,821
9,031
7,514
122,503

76,808
109,821
9,031
7,514
122,503

76,172
109,821
9,031
7,514
122,503

76,172 33118,915
109,821 3 61,260
3
9,031
9,031
7,514
7,514
3
122,503 3 247,782

9.031 |
7,514 I
236,548 ;

9,031
7,514

9,031
7,514

47,654
48,740
70,183
40, 740
69,414

47,654
48,740
70,183
40, 740
69,414

47,654
48.740
70,183
40.740
38,624

47,654
48.740
70,183
40.740
38,624

47,654
48.740

47,654
48.740

47,654
48.740

47,652 I
48,740 I

47,652
48,740

40.740

40.740

40.740

4a 740 I

95,607
44,832
1,067
30, 495
76,868

95, 607
44, 832
1,067
30,495
76,868

95, 607
44,832
1,067
30,495
76,868

95,607
44.832
1,067
30,495
7a 868

95,607
44,832
1,067
30,495

95,607
44,832
1,067
30,495
(>*)

95,607
44,832
1,067
30,495
(3l)

41,687
262, 398
82, 184
9, 124
40, 262

41,687
262,398
82,184
9,124
40,262

41,687
262,398
82,184
9,124
40, 262

41,687
262,398
82,184
9,124
40,262

41,687
262,398
82,184
9,124
40,262

66,836
24,022
55,256
3 97,548
3

66,836
24,022
55, 256
97,504

66,836
24,022
55,256
97,594

66,836
24,022
55,256
97,594

66,836
24,022
55,256
97,594

54,861
58,725

4,820
1,965
58
54,861
58,725

Idaho..
Illinois.
Indiana
Iowa___

83,354
56,043
36,045
55,586
81,774

83,354
3 56,043
4
1 36,045
3
55,586
81,774

83,354
56,002
35,885
55,586
81,774

83,354
56,002
35,885
55,586
81,774

Kentucky.......
Louisiana........
Maine..............
Maryland.......
Massachusetts

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

40,181
45,409
29,895
9,941
8,039

Michigan............
Minnesota..........
Mississippi.........
Missouri.............
Montana.............

57,480
80,858
46,362
68,727
30146, 131

57,480
80,858
46, 362
68,727
146,201

Nebraska............
N evada..............
New Hampshire
New Jersey........
New M exico—

76,808
109,821
9,031
7,514
122,503

New Y o r k _____
North Carolina.
North D akota...
Ohio....................
Oklahoma..........
Oregon................
Pennsylvania...
Rhode Island. . .
8outh Carolina..
8outh D akota...

4,820
1,965

16
32

!

j

i
!

51,279

42,625

(*
»)

(»)

(»)

41,687
41,687
262,398
262,398
82,184 33122,887
9,124
9,124
40,262
64,284
66,836
24,022
55,256
97,594

97,6
41

33,319

9,031
7,514

9,031
7,514

9,031
7,514

9,031
7,514

47,652
48,740

47,652
48,740

47,652
48,740

47,652
48,740

47,652
48,740

40,740

40,228

4 a 228

40,228

33 40,228

282; 257 ■
44,832
44,832
1,067 j
1,067
30,495 ' 30,495

44,832
1,067
3a 495

44,832
1,067
30,495

44,832
1,067
30,495

44,832
1,067
30,495

33 44,832
1,067
30,495

41,687

41,687

41,687

41,687

41,687

33 46,977

9,124
64,252

9,124
64,252

9,124
64,252

9,124
64,252

9,124
64,252

9,124
64,284

25,855

(»)

318,167

41,687
232,398
23a 610
9,124
64,284

”

183,254
55,256 |

55,256

82,643 I

5,290
608,665
30,790

30,790

69,414
147,687

535,003 j
69,414
69,414
147,693 3I312,094 1
i

1 Net reduction of 114 square miles due to building of Pathfinder and Shoshone
Reservoirs (46 square miles of water surface) in W yom ing, and several reservoirs
in connection with irrigation projects, (70 square miles of water surface) in Montana,
and reclamation o f 2 square miles o f Potomac River flats in District of Columbia.
3 N et reduct ion o f 269 square miles due to drainage o f lakes and swamps in Illinois
and Indiana (201 square miles o f land) build i ng of Roosevelt and Laguna Reservoirs
in Arizona (30 square miles o f water surface) and overflow o f Colorado River into
Salton Sea in California (440 square miles of water surface).
3 Increase of 194 square miles due to reclamation of 2 square miles o f Potomac
River flats in District of Columbia and 192 square miles of Lake Tulare in California.
4 1ncludes Gadsden Purchase (29,628 square miles) in 1853.
4 Includes Texas annexation (385,590 square miles) in 1845; Oregon territory
(282,257 square miles) in 1846; and Mexican Cession (522,902 square miles) in 1848.
8 Includes Florida Purchase (54,861 square miles) and territory gained by treaty
with Spain (12,862 square miles) in 1819.
7 Includes Louisiana Purchase (817,885 square miles) of 1803.
8 Includes the drainage basin o f the R ed River of the North.
9 Decrease o f 25 square miles due to building o f Roosevelt Reservoir and 5 square
miles due to building o f Laguna Reservoir.
I0Decrease o f 440 square miles due to overflow o f Colorado River into Stilton Sea.
3 Increase of 192 square miles due to reclamation of part of Lake Tulare, Cali­
3
fornia.
3 Area given is that in 1861.
3




,753,588 1,753,588 •1,753,588 31,685,865

1800

52,525

4,820
1,965
58
54,861
58,725

Territory northwest of
Ohio River..................
Territory south of Ten­
nessee...........................
Missouri Territory-----Indian Territory and
unorganized territory.
Dakota Territory..........

1810

1820

51,279

4,820
1,965
1 60
3
54,861
58,725

Wyoming.....

1830

52,525
155,900

4,820
1,965
60
54,861
58,725

W ashington...
West Virginia.
Wisconsin.......

1840

51,279
51,279
113,840
52,525
52,525
155,900
155,900
103,658 13103,668

51,279
113,840
52,525
155,900
103,658

Tennessee.
Texas.........
Utah...........
Verm ont...
Virginia___

1850

51,279

51,279
51,279
51,279
113,840
113,810 8 113,810
52,525
52,525
52,525
155,652 38155,652 ” 150,092
103,658
103,658
103,658

Connecticut....................
Delaware................... .
District o f Colum bia.. Florida....................... .
Georgia............................

1860

2,973,776 32,973,890 82,974,159 2,973,965 2,973,965 2,973,965 42,973,965 *2,944,337
51,279
113,840
52,525
155,900
103,658

Alabama..........................
Arizona.........................
Arkansas....................- California........................
C olorado........................

1870

MILES, B Y STATES A N D T E R R IT O R IE S :

511,967 I

8
674,183 3 777,940

52,750

3 Increase o f 2 square miles due to reclamation o f Potomac River flats.
3
14 Increase o f 41 square miles due to drainage o f lakes and swamps.
18 Increase o f 160 square miles due to drainage of lakes and swamps.
3 Then part o f Virginia; area given is that in 1792, when it was admitted as a
8
37 T hen named Orleans territory; includes 4,611 square miles of disputed territory
attached to state o f Louisiana in 1812, and excludes 11,344 square miles gained b y
treaty with Spain in 1819.
38 T hen under the jurisdiction o f Massachusetts; admitted as a state in 1820.
38 Includes 5,880 square miles of disputed territory attached to Mississippi Terri­
tory in 1812.
30 Decrease o f 70 square miles due to building o f several reservoirs in connection
with irrigation projects.
3 T hen part o f Dakota Territory.
3
33 Then part o f ‘ ‘territory northwest o f the Ohio R iv er;" area given is that in
1802, when it was admitted as a state.
3 Includes 314 square miles ceded to the Trnited States b y the state o f New York
8
in 1781 and sold to the state o f Pennsylvania in 1792.
38 Then known as “ territory southwest o f the Ohio R iver” ; includes 5,290 square
miles o f territory ceded to the United States b y the state o f South Carolina in 1787.
33 Decrease o f 46 square miles due t o building o f Pathfinder and Shoshone Reser­
voirs.
38 Then named territory o f Louisiana.

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

6
G E O G R A P H IC D IV ISIO N S .

W EST NORTH

In making comparisons of the growth in population,
manufactures, and agriculture for groups of states,
it has been found of great advantage to divide the
United States into certain groups termed geographic
divisions. The grouping of the country by geographic
divisions is a natural one, and by the aid of it certain
characteristic features in the development of groups
of states are brought out. At the Fourteenth Census
the United States was divided into nine geographic
divisions, the boundaries of which are shown on
Plate No. 2. The states comprised in each division
are as follows:
NEW

Maine.
New Hampshire.

A T L A N T IC

Ohio.
Indiana.




CENTRAL

Illinois.
Michigan.

Pennsylvania.
D IV I S I O N .

A T L A N T IC

CENTRAL

CEN TRAL

Montana.
Idaho.
Wyoming.

Mississippi.

D IV IS IO N .

Louisiana.
Oklahoma.
M O U N T A IN

South Carolina.
Georgia.
Florida.

D IV IS IO N .

Tennessee.
Alabama.
W E S T SO U TH

Nebraska.
Kansas.

D IV IS IO N

Virginia.
West Virginia.
North Carolina.

E A S T SO U T H

Rhode Island.
Connecticut.

D IV IS IO N .

New Jersey.
EAST NORTH

Delaware.
Maryland.
District of Columbia.

Kentuckv.

D IV IS IO N .

Missouri.
North Dakota.
South Dakota.
SO U TH

Arkansas.

D IV IS IO N .

Vermont.
Massachusetts.
M ID D L E

New York.

ENGLAND

Minnesota.
Iowa.

CENTRAL

Texas.

D IV IS IO N .

Colorado.
New Mexico.
Arizona.

Utah.
Nevada.

'
P A C IF IC

Wisconsin.
Washington.

D IV I S I O N .

Oregon.

California.

CENTERS AND MEDIAN LINES.

CENTER OF POPULATION.
After the decennial census has been completed it is
of great interest to note the direction in which the
center of population has moved during the decade,
the movement being shown by the change in its
location. On the basis of the Fourteenth Census
returns the center of population and the median lines
for continental United States have been determined
for January 1, 1920. In these calculations no account
is taken of the territory and population of Alaska and
of other noncontiguous territory. The location of the
center at the dates of the several censuses, 1790 to
1920, and the movement of the point from decade to
decade are indicated in the accompanying tables and
Plates 120 to 138, inclusive, which include, also, a map
on which are drawn the median parallel of latitude
and the median meridian of longitude, 1920.
A somewhat technical significance, different from
that frequently given to it, attaches to the term
“ center of population,” as used in census publica­
tions. The center is often understood to be the point
of intersection of a north and south line, which divides
the population equally, with an east and west line,
which likewise divides it equally. This point of inter­
section is, in a certain sense, a center of population; it
is here, however, designated the median point to dis­
tinguish it from the point technically defined as the
center.
There are points different in character which may
be termed “ center of population,” but at each census
the term “ center of population” has been applied to
the point which may be considered as the center of
gravity of the United States; in other words, the
point upon which the United States would balance, if it
Were a rigid plane without weight and the population
distributed thereon, each individual being assumed to
have equal weight and to exert an influence on the
central point proportional to his distance from the
point. The pivotal point, therefore, would be its
center of gravity and is the point referred to by the
term used in the census as “ center of population.”
This is sometimes confused with another point which
we term the “ median point.” Continuing the above
analogy it may be noted that the median point, which
may be described as the numerical center of popula­
tion, is in no sense a center of gravity. In determin­
ing the median point distance is not taken into account
and the location of the units of population is consid­
ered only in relation to the intersecting median lines—




as being north or south of the median parallel and
east or west of the median meridian. It is evident
that extensive changes in the geographical distribu­
tion of the population may take place without affect­
ing the position of the median point. In this respect
the median point differs essentially from the center of
population, which responds to the slightest population
change in any section of the country. To illustrate:
Since the median point lies east of Minnesota, a mil­
lion persons could move from Minnesota to Oregon
without affecting the median point, while the move­
ment of 500 persons from one town in Indiana to
another, across the north and south line passing
through the median point, would change the location
of the point. On the other hand, a movement of a
million persons from Minnesota to Oregon would have
a very considerable effect on the center of population,
since, in terms of the above analogy, the pressure
exerted by each individual would increase in propor­
tion to the distance traveled away from the center.
If all the people in the United States were to be
assembled at one place, the center of population
would be the point which they could reach with the
minimum aggregate travel, assuming that they all
traveled in direct lines from their residence to the
meeting place. No such statement holds true of the
median point.
M E T H O D O F D E T E R M IN IN G T H E C E N T E R O F P O P U L A T IO N .

In making the computations for the location of the
center of population it is necessary to assume that the
center is at a certain point. Through this point a
parallel and a meridian are drawn, crossing the entire
country. In making the computations for 1920, the
same point was selected as in 1910; this intersection
was assumed to be where the parallel of 39° north lati­
tude intersects the meridian of 86° west longitude,
which lines were taken as the axes of moments.
The product of the population of a given area by its
distance from the assumed parallel is called a north or
south moment, and the product of the population of
the area by its distance from the assumed meridian is
called an east or west moment. In calculating north
and south moments the distances are measured in
minutes of arc; in calculating east and west moments
it is necessary to use miles on account of the unequal
length of the degrees and minutes in different lati­
tudes. The population of the country is grouped by
square degrees— that is, by areas included between
consecutive parallels and meridians— as they are con(7)

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

8

venient units with which to work. The population of
the principal cities is then deducted from that of the
respective square degrees in which they lie and treated
separately. The center of population of each square
degree is assumed to be at its geographical center
except where such an assumption is manifestly incor­
rect ; in these cases the position of the center of popu­
lation of the square degree is estimated as nearly as
possible. The population of each square degree north
and south of the assumed parallel is multiplied by the
distance of its center from that parallel; a similar cal­
culation is made for the principal cities; and the sum
of the north moments and the sum of the south
moments are ascertained. The difference between
these two sums, divided by the total population of the
country, gives a correction to the latitude. In a simi­
lar manner the sums of the east and of the west
moments are ascertained and from them the correc­
tion in longitude is made.
At the Fourteenth Census the center of population
was in the following position:

population proportional to their distance from the
center.
There has been slight change in the northern move­
ment of the center of population since 1900, as from
1900 to 1910 the northern movement was 0.7 of a
mile and from 1910 to 1920 a little less than 0.2 of a
mile, showing that the weight of the population of the
United States north and south of the thirty-ninth
parallel was nearly equal.
The result of the computations in 1920 for the
location of the median point shows that it had moved
east 8.8 miles, while, during the same decade, the
center of population had a western movement of 9.8
miles. The movement in opposite directions of the
two points shows in a striking manner the difference
in the character of the methods used for their loca­
tion. There was very slight difference in the northern
movement of the two points, the median point having
made practically no change since 1910 (0.019 of a
mile), and the center of population moving only0.2 of a
mile.

Latitude................................................ 39° 10' 21" N.
Longitude............................................. 86° 43' 15" W.

L O C A T IO N O F T H E C E N T E R O F P O P U L A T IO N A T P R IO R CEN SU SE S.

.

This point is in southwestern Indiana, 1.9 miles
west of Whitehall, Clay township, and 8.3 miles
south-southeast of Spencer, Washington township,
Owen County, Ind., shown on map on Plate 120.
During the last decade, 1910 to 1920, the center of
population moved west 10' 55” , approximately 9.8
miles, the smallest movement the center has ever
shown, and about one-fourth of its westward move­
ment from 1900 to 1910, while its northward move­
ment was only 9” , or approximately two-tenths of a
mile. The great increase in the population of New
York, Pennsylvania, and certain other states north of
the thirty-ninth parallel has balanced the increase in
Texas, Oklahoma, and southern California. The ad­
vance toward the West is, to a large extent, due to
the increase in the population of the Pacific Coast
states, their distance from the center giving any
increase of population in those states much greater
weight than an equal increase in the populous states
east, which are nearer the center. The cities of
Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, with a com­
bined population of 1,398,661, exert a greater influ­
ence on the center of population than the cities of
Baltimore, Boston, Buffalo, Cleveland, Philadelphia,
and Pittsburgh, with a combined population of
5,197,624.
The westward movement from 1910 to 1920 was
due principally to the increase of over 1,000,000 in
the population of the state of California, which had
a greater growth than at the previous decade, from
1900 to 1910. In this connection it would be well to
call attention to the fact that individuals in the states
on the Pacific coast exert an influence on the center of




In 1790 the center of population was at 39° 16' 30”
north latitude and 76° 11' 12” west longitude, which,
according to the best maps, is a point in Maryland
about 23 miles east of Baltimore. During the decade
from 1790 to 1800 it moved almost due west to a
point about 18 miles west of the same city, latitude
39° 16' 6” , longitude 76° 56' 30” .
From 1800 to 1810 it moved west and slightly south
to a point in the state of Virginia about 40 miles
northwest by west of Washington, D. C., latitude
39° 11' 30” , longitude 77° 37' 12” . The southward
movement during this decade was due to the annex­
ation of the territory of Louisiana, which contained
quite extensive settlements.
From 1810 to 1820 the center of population moved
west and again slightly south to a point in what is
now West Virginia, about 16 miles east of Moorefield,
latitude 39° 5' 42” , longitude 78° 33'. This second
southward movement was due principally to the ex­
tension of settlements in Mississippi, Alabama, and
eastern Georgia.
From 1820 to 1830 it again moved west and south
to a point about 19 miles west-southwest of Moorefield,
in the area now comprising the state of West Virginia,
latitude 38° 57' 54” , longitude 79° 16' 54” . This is
the most decided southward movement that it has
made during any decade, owing to the annexation of
Florida and the great extension of settlements in Ala­
bama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas, or gener­
ally, it may be said, in the Southwest. The movement
from 1870 to 1880 was apparently greater, but this was
due chiefly to a defective enumeration in 1870, and
can not be considered as an actual change in the dis­
tribution of population.

9

CENTERS AND M EDIAN LINES.
From 1830 to 1840 it continued west, but slightly
changed its course to the north, reaching a point 16
miles south of Clarksburg, in the area now comprising
the state of W est Virginia, latitude 39° 2 ', longitude
80° IS'. During this decade population had increased
rapidly in the Prairie states and in the southern por­
tions of Michigan and Wisconsin.
From 1840 to 1850 the center moved west and
slightly south again, reaching a point about 23 miles
southeast of Parkersburg, in the area now comprising
the state of W est Virginia, latitude 38° 59', longitude
81° 19', the change of direction to the south being
largely due to the annexation of Texas.
From 1850 to 1860 it moved west and slightly north,
reaching a point 20 miles south by east of Chillicothe,
Ohio, latitude 39° 0 ' 2 4 ", longitude 82° 48' 4 8 ".
From 1860 to 1870 it moved west and sharply north,
reaching a point about 48 miles east by north of Cin­
cinnati, Ohio, in latitude 39° 12', longitude 83° 35' 4 2".
This northward movement was due in part to the
waste and destruction in the South, consequent upon
the Civil War, and in part to the fact that the census
of 1870 was defective in its enumeration of the south­
ern people, especially of the newly enfranchised Negro
population.
In 1880 the center of population had returned south
to nearly the latitude occupied in 1860, being in Ken­
tucky, just south of the Ohio River, in latitude
39° 4 ' 8 " , longitude 84° 39' 4 0 ", 8 miles west by
south of Cincinnati, Ohio.
In 1890, owing to the great increase of population
in the cities of the Northwest and in the state of Wash­
ington, also in New England, the center moved north
T able

to latitude 39° 11' 5 6 ", longitude 85° 32' 5 3 ", to a
point 20 miles east of Columbus, Ind.
During the decade from 1890 to 1900 the center of
population moved west 16' 1 ", or 14.6 miles, to longi­
tude 85° 48' 5 4 ", and south 2 ' 2 0 ", or 2.8 miles, to
latitude 39° 9 ' 3 6 ", to a point 6 miles southeast of
Columbus, Ind. The great increase in the population
of Indian Territory, Oklahoma, and Texas was largely
offset by an increase in the population o f the North
Atlantic states.
In 1910 the center o f population was at the point
where the parallel of latitude of 39° 10' 1 2 " N. inter­
sects the meridian of longitude o f 86° 32' 2 0 " W . and
for the first time in its history was located in a city,
the city of Bloomington, Ind. From 1900 to 1910 it
moved 0.7 of a mile north and 38.9 miles west, the
westward movement being nearly three times as great
as from 1890 to 1900, but was less than the westward
movement for all previous decades, except between
1800 and 1810.
The closeness with which the center o f population
throughout its westward movement has clung to the
thirty-ninth parallel o f latitude is remarkable. The
point farthest north was reached in 1790 and the
farthest south in 1830, but the difference was only
21.4 miles. The greatest movement west was during
the decade from 1850 to 1860, when the center ad­
vanced 80.6 miles; the least movement west was dur­
ing the last decade, from 1910 to 1920, when it advanced
9.8 miles. The total westward movement from 1790.
to 1920 was 567 miles. Table 6 and the map on Plate
121 show the location o f the center o f population
and its advance during each decade since 1790.

6 .—POSITION OF THE CENTER OF POPULATION: 1790 TO 1920.
MOVEMENT IN MILES DURING PRECEDING
DECADE.

CEN8V8 T E A R .

1790...............
1800...............
1810...............
1820...............
1830...............
1840...............
1850...............
1860...............
1870...............
1880...............
1890...............
1900...............
1910...............
1920...............

North latitude.

0
39
39
39
39
38
39
38
39
39
39
39
39
39
39




t

16
16
11
5
57
2
59
0
12
4
11
9
10
10

ft

30
6
30
42
54
0
0
24
0
8
56
36
12
21

W est longitude

O

76
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
85
86
86

/
11
56
37
33
16
18
19
48
35
39
32
48
32
43

ft

12
30
12
0
54
0
0
48
42
40
53
54
20
15

APPROXIMATE LOCATION B T IMPORTANT TOWNS.

23 miles east of Baltimore, Md................................
18 miles west of Baltimore, Md...............................
40 miles northwest by west of Washington, D.
(in Va.).
16 miles east of Moorefield, W. Va.1.......................
19 miles west-southwest of Moorefield, W. Va.1. .
16 miles south of Clarksburg, W. Va.1....................
23 miles southeast of Parkersburg, W. Va.1..........
20 miles south by east of Chillicothe, Ohio..........
48 miles east by north of Cincinnati, Ohio...........
8 miles west by south of Cincinnati, Ohio (in Ky.)..
20 miles east of Columbus, Ind.................................
6 miles southeast of Columbus, Ind..........................
In the city of Bloomington, Ind...............................
1.9 miles west of Whitehall, Clay township, Owen
County, Ind.; 8.3miles south-southeast of Spen­
cer, Washington township, Owen County, Ind.

From
point to
point in
direct
line.

West­
ward.

40.6
36.9
50.5
40.4
55.0
54.8
80.6
44.1
58.1
48.6
14.6
39.0
1 9.8

40.6
36.5
50.1
39.4
54.8
54.7
80.6
42.1
57.4
47.7
14.4
38.9
9.8

> West Virginia was set oft from Virginia Dec. HI, 1$62; admitted as a state June 19,1863.

North­
ward.

4.7
1.6
13.3
. 9.0
0.7
0.2

South­
ward.

0.5
5.3
6.7
9.0
3.5
9 .i
2.8

10

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

MEDIAN LINES.

passing through Norristown and continuing through
southern Pennsylvania and across the northern ex­
tremity of West Virginia, leaving the latter state at
a point a few miles north of Wheeling. I t nearly
bisects Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, crossing about 10
miles north of Columbus, Ohio, 25 miles north of
Indianapolis, Ind., and about 20 miles north of Spring­
field, 111. Through Missouri it runs about 30 miles
south of the Iowa and Missouri line, thence passing
through Nebraska about 10 miles north of its southern
boundary, and across the northern part of Colorado,
passing about 5 miles north of Boulder city. Its
location in Utah is about 45 miles south of Salt Lake
City, near Spanish Fork city. There are no large
towns near its course across the northern part of
Nevada. In California it passes 5 miles south of
Red Bluff city, Tehama County. The western ter­
minus of the median parallel is on the Pacific coast, in
Humboldt County, Calif., about 5 miles north of
Point Delgada and 25 miles south of Cape Mendocino,
the point of continental United States extending far­
thest west.

In connection with the definition of the median
point another method of presenting facts with regard
to the geographical distribution of the population
has been noted, involving the location of median
lines. A parallel of latitude is determined which
evenly divides the population so that the population
north of that parallel is equal to that south. Simi­
larly, a meridian of longitude is determined which
divides the population evenly east and west of the line.
In calculating these median lines it is necessary, in
the case of the square degrees of latitude and longi­
tude which are traversed by the lines themselves,
to assume that the population is evenly distributed
through these square degrees or to make an estimated
adjustment where this is obviously not the case.
The eastern terminus of the median parallel,
according to the census of 1920, is on the New
Jersey coast near Seagirt. In its course west this
line passes through central New Jersey, leaving
the state near Burlington and entering Pennsyl­
vania a few miles north of Philadelphia, thence
T able

7 . — MEDIAN LINES: 1880 TO 1920.
M O V E M E N T IN M ILES
D U R IN G PR E C E D IN G D E C A D E .

CEN SU S T E A R .

Median parallel, Median meridian,
north latitude.
vest longitude.

0

1880.....................................
1890.....................................
1900.....................................
1910.....................................
1920.................................................

/

//

39 57 0
40 2 51
40 4 22
40 6 24
40 6 25

In locating the median meridian, it was found that
it had moved 8.8 miles east since 1910, and its north­
ern end was located 8 miles east of Whitefish Point
in the northern peninsula of Michigan; from that point
it passes south through the southern peninsula of
Michigan, about 10 miles west of Lansing, approxi­
mately 1 mile west of the eastern boundary of Indiana,
and crosses the Ohio River about 15 miles west of
Cincinnati, Ohio, thence through the central part of
Kentucky, passing through Frankfort. After cross­
ing eastern Tennessee, it enters Georgia about 20
miles east of Chattanooga. It then crosses the western
part of Georgia about 5 miles east of Columbus and
leaves this state and enters Florida where the FloridaGeorgia boundary line crosses the Apalachicola
River and ends in the Gulf of Mexico, 8 miles east of
Apalachicola.
'
During the three decades from 1880 to 1910, there
was little change in the position of the median parallel,
the changes being so slight they could not be indicated




o

/

7
40
51
59
49

12
1
29
59
59

Median
meridian
westward.

Median
meridian
eastward.

//

84
84
84
84
84

Median
parallel
northward.

6.6
2.4
2. 3
0.019

!
:

27.0
10.8
7. 5
8.8

on a small map. During the decade from 1910 to
1920, the median parallel was practically in the same
location, but the median meridian moved east 8.8 miles.
This was due entirely to the great increase in popu­
lation of the states on the Atlantic slope.
The greatest change is noted for the decade from
1880 to 1890, during which period the median parallel
moved north 6.6 miles, and the median meridian
west 27 miles. The latitude and longitude of these
lines at the several censuses, from 1880 to 1920, are
shown in Table 7, and their location in 1920 is shown
on the map on Plate No. 122.
Although the median line exactly bisects the popu­
lation. as a whole it does not necessarily bisect the
population of the eastern or western parts of the
country. The median parallel does not bisect even
approximately the population residing east or west of
the Mississippi River. The intersecting median lines
divide the country into four parts, but in neither of
these parts is there exactly one-fourth of the total

CENTERS AND M EDIAN LINES.
population. The diagonally opposite sections, how­
ever, are necessarily equal in population;1 that is, the
northeastern section exactly equals in population the
southwestern and, similarly, the population o f the
southeastern section exactly equals the population o f
the northwestern; in other words, the northeastern
and southwestern quarters each contain a population
of approximately 31,450,000, while the southeastern
and northwestern sections each contain about
21,400,000.
MEDIAN POINT.

The movement of the center of population in 1920J
as compared with the movement of the median point,
shows that the computations are made on an entirely
different basis and the results are really not comparable.
In other words, the median point and the center of
population are affected differently by the movement
of population. From 1910 to 1920 the center of
population moved west 9.8 miles, while the median
point moved east 8.8 miles. The effect of the increase
in population of 1,000,000 persons in California was
much less on the median point than it was on the
center of population, due to the fact that the distance
of the individual from the median point does not
affect it. It will also be noted that both the center
of population and the median point had a very slight
northern movement, being located on parallels of
latitude less than a degree apart.
What is termed by the Census Bureau the “ median
point” of the population corresponds, as already
stated, to a common conception of the center of popu­
lation; that is, it is the junction of the median line
dividing the population equally north and south with
the median line dividing it equally east and west, dis­
tance of the population from the center not being
considered. As already indicated, the changes in the
median point reflect only the difference between the
growth of population east of the point and the growth
west of it and the difference between the growth north
and south of tho point; other differences in relative
growth do not affect its location.
In 1920 the median point was located at latitude
40° 6 ' 25” north and longitude 84° 49' 59” west,
near the eighty-fifth meridian. Its location, therefore,
was 6 miles slightly west of south o f Union City,
Randolph County, In d .; its eastward movement during
the decade was 8.8 miles and its northward movement
0.019 of a mile. Comparing its movement since 1910
with that o f the center o f population, it will be noted
that the north movement of the center of population

'The mathematical demonstration of this is simple. If A, II, C,
and D represent, res]>ertively, the imputation of the northwestern,
northeastern, southeastern, and southwestern sections, then:
A + B = i population of U. !S.
B + t = l population of U. S.
A +B =B +C
Therefore A=C
Similarly it may be proven that B=I>.




11

was 0.18 o f a mile more than that o f the median point;
the center o f population moved west 9.8 miles, while
the median point m oved east 8.8 miles, showing that
the increase in the population of the Pacific coast had
a much greater influence on the movement of the center
of population than upon the median point.
It will be noted that the location of the median
point was 121 miles northeast of the center of popula­
tion in 1920, showing the divergence of the methods
of finding the two points (the center of population
and the median point).
The exact location of the median point is indicated
by the median lines already shown; in Table 8 its
approximate location with reference to certain towns
is described.
T able 8 .— Position
CENSUS T E A R .

1880..........:
1890..........'
1900..........j
1910..........1
1920..........1

or

the

Median Point :

1880 to 1920.

Approxim ate location b y im portant towns.

16 miles nearly due west of Springfield, Ohio.
5 miles southwest of Greenville, Ohio.
In Spartanburg, Ind.
3 miles south of Winchester, Ind.
6 miles slightly west of south of Union City, Ind.

CENTERS OF POPULATION OF STATES.

The center of the population o f each o f the states
is shown on Plates 123 to 136, inclusive, and the loca­
tion of each o f the points, from 1880 to 1920, is shown
in Table 9 on pages 13 to 16.
There have been so many requests as to the location
of the centers o f population of the various states that
the computations were first made in 1910 for the cen­
suses beginning with the census of 1880, and they
have been again computed for 1920.
The direction of the movement of the center in each
state during the last 40 years is a matter of interest,
showing as it does the direction in which the popula­
tion has grown and, to a certain extent, the direction
in which the state has developed.
From 1900 to 1920 the center of population of the
United States, exclusive of its outlying possessions,
moved west and north. A comparison of the move­
ments of the centers of population of the states, in­
cluding the District of Columbia, during the decade
from 1910 to 1920 brings out the fact that the centers
of 23 states m oved north, while for 26 states the
movement was south; the centers of population o f 26
of the states m oved east and of 23 m oved west. The
movement o f the center o f population o f each state
does not, therefore, coincide with the m ovement of
the center of population of the entire United States.
As an analysis of the movement c f the center of
population for each state was deemed impracticable,
only a brief description is given of the movement for
a few of the states in ■which tbe variation of the move­
ment of the center presents some exceptional features.
The center of population of California from 1880 to

12

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

1890, advanced 34.9 miles south and 23.1 miles east,
an actual distance of 41.9 miles; this was the greatest
advance made during that decade in any state.
From 1890 to 1900 Oklahoma held this distinction,
when the movement of the center was 30.7 miles, the
north movement 13.2 miles and the west movement
27.7 miles. The greatest movement from 1900 to
1910 was made in North Dakota, the distance the
center moved being 44.7 miles, made up of a south
movement of 1.3 miles and a west movement of 44.7
miles. The greatest distance any center moved from
1910 to 1920 was in the state of Montana. It moved
38.3 miles northeast by east to a point 9.7 miles
southwest of Utica, Judith Basin County.
The greatest distance the center of population of
any state advanced during the 40 years from 1880 to
1920 was in California. The center moved in a south­
easterly direction 130 miles, the point in 1880 being
located 3.3 miles east by south of Moorland, San
Joaquin County, and in 1920, 36.2 miles south-south­
west of Fresno, Fresno County.
It is well, also, to note those states in which the
least change occurred in the location of the center.
The center of population of Massachusetts from 1880
to 1890 advanced one-tenth of a mile east; there was
no north nor south movement; from 1890 to 1900 there
was a south movement of two-tenths of a mile, and a
movement east of 158 feet. From 1900 to 1910 it
had an eastern movement of 2.6 miles and one-tenth
of a mile north, while from 1910 to 1920 it moved
five-tenths of a mile south-southwest.
In Delaware, from 1900 to 1910, the movement was
three-tenths of a mile north and four-tenths of a mile
west; from 1910 to 1920 the movement was accelerated
when the center moved 15.6 miles north by east, the
greatest movement that the center has ever made in
this state.
The smallest change in the location of the center
made during the period from 1880 to 1920 was in
Rhode Island; its center of population during the 40
years moved 1.7 miles directly north. The center of
population of this state in 1880 was located 4.1 miles
southwest by south of Providence and in 1920 it was
2.3 miles southwest of the same city.
The center of population of New York state in 1880
was 3 miles northwest by west of Craigeclare, Sullivan
County, and in 1920 it was 3.8 miles south by west of
Forestine, in the same county. The distance trav­
ersed was 6.5 miles from 1880 to 1890; 9.5 miles from
1890 to 1900; 11 miles from 1900 to 1910; and 3.9 miles
from 1910 to 1920. The movement was south and
east from 1880 to 1920, except from 1900 to 1910, when
the movement was south and west.
Although Texas has the greatest area of any state,
the movements of the center were not large, as the
development in all parts of the state has been nearly
uniform. The center in 1880 was located 6.4 miles




southwest of Thornton, Limestone County; in the 40
years to 1920, it had shifted to 12.1 miles southwest
of Waco, McLennan County. The northwestern
movement from 1880 to 1890 was 13.7 miles; from
1890 to 1900, 3.2 miles; from 1900 to 1910, 22.6 miles;
while from 1910 to 1920 it was 5 miles southwest.
The states which show the greatest variation in the
location of the center are Arizona, Kansas, Nevada,
and New Jersey. For Arizona the movement shown
in 1890 was 2 miles south and one-tenth of a mile
west; from 1890 to 1900 it reversed the direction to
21.2 miles north and 9.3 miles east, an actual distance
of 23.2 miles. During the decade from 1900 to 1910
it moved 11.5 miles south and 15.7 miles east, and
from 1910 to 1920 it moved almost directly west 13.3
miles. For Kansas, while the movement was south
at each census, from 1880 to 1890 it advanced west­
ward 24.3 miles; from 1890 to 1900, 22.3 miles east;
while from 1900 to 1910 the direction again changed
to the west, 5.7 miles; from 1910 to 1920 the western
movement was only four-tenths of a mile, a net move­
ment during the 40 years of 9.9 miles south and 8.1
miles west. From 1880 to 1890 the movement in
Nevada was south 11.2 miles and west 2.1 miles;
from 1890 to 1900 it changed, moving north 22.6
miles and east 11 miles. The development of the
mines between 1900 and 1910 in the southeastern
portion of the state again changed the direction and
produced the greatest advance at any decade, the
movement being 40 miles south and 14.2 miles east,
an actual distance of 42.4 miles; from 1910 to 1920 it
moved 4.8 miles north-northeast, the smallest change
it had ever made. During the 40 years from 1880 to
1920 the net movement was 24.1 miles south and 25
miles east. New Jersey has also shown considerable
change in the direction of the movement of its center
of population. From 1880 to 1890 it was 13.2 miles
north and seven-tenths of a mile east; in the next
decade, from 1890 to 1900, the movement was 10.8
miles south and five-tenths of a mile east; from 1900
to 1910 it again moved north 1.7 miles and east 2.9
miles, and from 1910 to 1920 the movement was
southeast, 2 miles.
.
The movement of the center of population of the
states of Maine, Massachusetts, and Oklahoma varied
in direction at each decade more than any of the other
states, the movement in each state being reversed at
each census.
Connecticut shows very small but steady movements
south and west, the distance from 1880 to 1890 being
1.9 miles; from 1890 to 1900, 1 mile; from 1900 to
1910, 1.3 miles; and from 1910 to 1920, 1.6 miles.
In Illinois the effect of the growth of Chicago on
the center of population is evident from its northeast
movement at each census, the actual distance from
1880 to 1890 being 18.4 miles; from 1890 to 1900, 10.8
miles; from 1900 to 1910, 6.4 miles; and from 1910 to
1920, 7.1 miles northeast.

13

CENTERS AND M EDIAN LINES
There were only seven states in which the center of
population moved in the same general direction at
each census from 1880 to 1920. These states are as
follows: In the state of Illinois it moved north and
east; for California and Georgia the movement was
south and east; for Connecticut, North Carolina, and
West Virginia the movement was south and west;
and for Maryland the movement was north and west.
A comparison of Plates Nos. 123 to 136, on which
are located the centers of population of the states,
will bring to our attention the fact that in only nine
T

states are the centers of population near the state
capitals. The nine states are Arkansas, Delaware,
Indiana, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. As the center
of population is the point from which all the popula­
tion is supposed to be equidistant, if it were necessary
to assemble all the inhabitants of a state at one place,
each individual to travel in a direct line from his
residence to the meeting place, the center of popula­
tion is the point they could all reach with the minimum
aggregate of travel.

9 . — C E N T E R S O F P O P U L A T IO N O F E A C H S T A T E : 1880 T O 1920.

able

A P P R O X IM A T E LOCATION B Y IM PO R TA N T T O W N S.

STATE.

Census
year.

North
latitude.

West
'
longitude. ,
County.

Colorado .......................

Connecticut ..................

De l a w a r e .....................

District of Colu m b ia .

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

33
33
33
33
33

17
15
34
24
21

36
51
20
18
3

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

34
34
34
34
34

55
57
56
55
55

41
35
18
16
14

92
92
92
92
92

30
29
28
25
20

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

37
37
37
36
36

55
25
14
42
20

55
35
26
29
23

121
121
120
120
120

27
2
53
31
10

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

39
39
39
39
39

5
9
5
11
14

23
52
45
53
53

105
105
105
105
105

32 53
14 10
16 5
11 28
1 24

1H
S0

41 32 49
41 31

41

41 31

23

41 30 54

1920

Californ ia ....................

51 9
54 38
53 13
54 7
57 26

1910

A rkan sas ......................

32
32
32
32
32

1900

A r izo n a ..........................

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

1890

Al a b a m a ........................

41 30

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

39
39
39
39
39

1900

Idaho ..............................

72:1°—24f-




5.5 miles
3.4 miles
5.7 miles
4.7 miles
2.0 miles

Pinal.........
Pinal........
Maricopa..
Gila...........
Pinal.........

18.7 miles N . b y W . o f Florence, Pinal C ounty........
16.6 miles N. b y W . o f Florence, Pinal C ounty........
9.2 miles SW . of Roosevelt Dam, Maricopa County.
12.3 miles W . b y N. o f Globe, Gila C ounty................
23.0 miles N N E . o f Florence, Pinal C ounty...............

23.2
19.5
13.3

25
41
27
8
48

Pulaski. . .
Faulkner..
P u la sk i...
Faulkner..
P u la sk i...

4.8 miles W S W . o f Mayflower, Faulkner C o u n ty ..
3.9 miles W N W . o f Mayflower, Faulkner C ou n ty..
3.2 miles W S W . o f Mayflower, Faulkner C o u n ty ..
3.0 m iles S S W . o f Mayflower, Faulkner C ou n ty....
9.0 miles N N W . o f Levy, Pulaski C ounty...............

2.3
1.9
3.3
4.1

42
20
11
23
54

San Joaquin..
Stanislaus___
Merced...........
Fresno...........
Fresno...........

3.3 miles E . b y S. o f Moorland, San Joaquin County
3.1 miles N N E . o f Crows Landing, Stanislaus C ounty.
6.2 miles N E . o f Ingomar, Merced C ounty..................
9.5 miles W S W . o f Mendota, Fresno C ounty..............
36.2 miles SSW . o f Fresno, Fresno C ounty..................

Park____
D ouglas..
Teller___
Douglas..
D ouglas..

13.7 miles E N E . o f Hartzell, Park C ounty.................
3.8 m iles W N W . o f W est Creek, Douglas C ounty. . .
6.4 m iles W S W . o f W est Creek, Douglas County.
3.6 miles N . b v W . o f West Creek. Douglas County.
13.0 miles S W 'b y S. o f Castle R ock, Douglas County

72 46 21

New H a v e n ..

72

0

New H a v e n ..

6

New H a v e n ..

72 50 20

New H a v e n ..

72 51

47

New H aven.

2.0 miles E N E . o f Meriden post office, N ew Haven
County.
0.8 m ile SSE. o f Meriden post office, New Haven
County.
1.2 miles SSW . o f Meriden post office, New Haven
County.
2.5 miles S W . o f Meriden post office, New Haven
County.
3.1 miles SSW . o f Meriden post office, New H aven
County.

35 30
35 36
35 9
35 6
32 9

K ent.............
K en t........... .
K ent........... .
K ent............
New Castle..

43 16
44 46
42 18
42 29
43 21

111 25 32
111 25 39
111 15 58
no 59 38
111 12 55

48

72 49

75
75
75
75
75

20 ft. W . of
4th St.NW .
111 ft.K .o f
5th St.N W .
57 ft. E o f
5thSt.NW .

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

29 43 40
29 29 15
29 28 40
29 19 30
29 4 36

83 17 0
83 3 28
83 7 19
83 0 32
82 46 42

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

33 2 4
33 0 0
32 56 38
32 54 25
32 54 17

83
S3
83
83
83

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

43
44
44
44
44

114
114
114
114
114

1920

Georgia ..........................

50
9
35
49
14

.0

59
12
36
30
14

34
41
14
50
12

From
point
to
North- South­ East­ West­
point ward. ward. ward. ward.
in
direct
line.

Chilton..
Chilton..
Chilton..
Chilton..
Chilton..

86
86
86
86
86

78 ft. N of
H . St.N W .
159 t. s o f
K S t .N W .
222 t.N of
M St.NW .

1910

F lorida ..........................

9
11
11
11
25

8

Nearest city or town.

M O V E M E N T IN M ILE S D U R IN G
P R ECED IN G D E C A D E .

W . b y N. of Clanton, Chilton C ounty.
S. b y E. o f Jemison, Chilton C o u n ty ..
SSE. o f Jemison, Chilton County.........
SSE. o f Jemison, Chilton C ounty.........
E . b y S. o f Jemison, Chilton C o u n ty ..

3.5 miles W . b y N . o f D over, K ent C ounty...........
4.0 miles N W . o f D over, Kent C ounty....................
4.0 miles N W .b y N . o f Dover, K en t C ounty........
4.2 miles N W . b y N . o f Dover. Kent C ounty.............
8.4 miles E . b y N . o f Townsena, New Castle C ounty..

4.3

2.9

1.0

3.9

2.0

8.2
9.6

2.4

1.0

3.8

2.0
21.2

2.2

11.5
3.7

9.3
15.7

1.5

0.1
12.8

1.2

0.04

3.1
4.1

34.9

12.8

23.1
8.4

36.7
25.4
5.2

0.2
0.8

0.7

1.2

41.9
15.3
41.8
31.7
17.6
5.0

1.5

4.0

19.0

20.1

16.8
4.7

1.7

4.1
9.0

7.1
3.4

1.3

1.4

1.0

0.3

1.0

1.3

0.6

1.1

1.6

0.9

1.3

1.5

0.6

0.3
15.6

1.5
0.5
0.3
15.4

0.4

0.1
‘ 6*4

2.6

Opposite N o. 801 Fourth Street N W .
No. 927 F ifth Street N W ......................

1 983
1,521

1643

* 743

Central Methodist Episcopal Church, 1215-1217 5th
Street N W .

1,520

Lafayette.
Lafayette.
Lafayette.
L ev y .........
L evy.........

1.0 m ile SW . o f Hines, Lafayette C ounty.........
7.0 miles N . b y W . o f Vista, L evy C ounty-----7.7 miles N W . b y N . o f Vista, L evy C ounty...
5.0 miles SSE. o f Vista, L evy C ounty.............
8.8 miles W . b y S. o f Lebanon, L e v y County.

42 0
40 17
38 24
37 8
36 32

Jones..
Jones..
Jones..
Jones..
Jones.-

10.2 miles W N W . o f Gray, Jones C ounty.................
8.3 miles W . o f Grav, Jones County...........................
7.3 miles N . b y W . o f Macon, B ib b C ounty.............
4.5 miles N . b v E . o f Macon, B ib b C ounty..............
7.9 miles S W .*by S. o f Gray, Jones C ounty.............

24 4
27 33
37 19
47 38
35 17

Custer................
Custer................
L em hi...............
Custer................
Custer...........; . .

19.5 miles E . b y S. o f Pierson, Custer C ounty.........
4.8 miles S. b y W . of Clayton, Custer C ounty.........
13.0 miles S. 6y E . o f Meyers Cove, Lemhi County .
6.6 miles N K. o f Sunbeam, Custer C ounty...............
27.4 miles SW . b y S. o f Challis, Custer C ounty.......
1 Feet.

16.6
0.7
10.5
17.1

22.0
2.9
4.3

2.8

13.5

2.4
3.9
2.5

21.4
3.9
12.5

1.7

0.2

0.6

15.4
2S.3
10.5
21.7

154

15.1
27.1

6.8

3.8

13.9

1.8
0.6

1.2

2.9

6.2

19.1

8.1
8.5

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

14

T able 9 .—CENTEKS OF POPULATION OF EACH STATE: 1880 TO 1920—Continued.

APPR03 IM A T E
APPROX

STATE.

Census
year.

N orth
latitude.

LO CATIO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

W est
longitude.
County.

Nearest city or town.

M O V E M E N T IN M IL E S D U R IN G
PR E C E D IN G D E C A D E .

From
point
to
North- South- East- Westpoint
ward. ward. ward. ward.
in
direct
line.

57
44
37
33
29

44
34
12
18
1

McLean.................
Livingston...........
Livingston...........
Livingston...........

2.8 miles SE. of Bloomington, M cLean C ou n ty.........
2.0 miles E . b y N . of Lexington, McLean C ounty___
1.5 miles N. b y E . o f W eston, M cLean C ounty..........
4.0 miles SE. o f Pontiac, Livingston C ounty..............
8.0 m iles N E . b y E . o f Pontiac, Livingston C ou n ty.

39
39
39
39
40

51
52
54
56
0

33
53
36
49
14

&
>
86
86
86
86

13
14
14
15
17

26
16
3
47
16

Marion..................
Marion..................
B oone....................
B oone....................

2.0 miles S E . o f N ew Augusta, Marion C ounty.........
0.5 m ile N . o f N ew Augusta, Marion C ounty..............
2.0 m iles N . b y E . o f New Augusta, Marion C ou n ty.
0.3 m ile W . b y N . of Zionsville, B oone C ounty.........
4.4 miles N N W . o f Zionsville, B oone C ounty.............

41
41
41
41
41

51
56
55
57
58

40
2
45
43
45

92
92
93
93
93

56
58
15
15
17

53
43
11
18
43

Marshall...............
S tory.....................
S tory.....................
S tory.....................

1.8 miles S W . o f Laurel. Marshall C ounty...................
2.9 miles N W . of Laurel, Marshall C ounty.................
2.6 miles N E .b y E. of Collins, Story C ounty........... .
4.8 miles S E . of Colo, Story C ounty..............................
2.8 miles S. b y E . of Colo, Story C ounty......................

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

38
38
38
38
38

36
33
32
29
27

11
1
25
31
33

96
97
96
96
96

7
41
8 0
43 21
49 41
50 9

3.3 miles
Marion.................. 1.7 miles
Morris.................... 7.2 miles
Marion.................. ! 7.0 miles
Marion.................. 7.3 miles

SSW . o f W ilsey, Morris C ounty....................
E. o f Tam pa, Marion C ounty........................
SSW . o f w ilsey, Morris C ounty....................
E . b y S. o f Lincolnville. Marion C ou n ty....
SE. b y E . of Lincolnville, Marion C ou n ty..

24.6
22.3

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

37
37
37
37
37

42
42
42
42
42

40
46
15
29
21

85
85
85
85
85

26
21
24
21
15

30
52
40
29
24

1.7 miles N . b y W . of Holycross, Marion C ounty.......
Washington......... 1.0 m ile E . o f Blincoe, Washington C ounty...............
Marion.................. 2.0 miles E N E . of Holycross, Marion C ounty.............
Washington......... 1.4miles E . b y S. o f Blincoe, W ashington C o u n ty ..
Washington......... 2.5 m iles N W . b y W . o f Springfield, Washington
County.

4.2
2.7
3.0
5.6

0.1
6.3

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

30
30
30
30
30

49
50
48
48
51

29
40
56
47
28

91
91
91
91
91

21
29
31
33
36

8
24
46
50
40

West Feliciana1..
W est Feliciana1..
Pointe C oupee1..
Pointe C oupee1..
Pointe C oupee1. .

8.3 j
3.0 !

1.4

4.2 !

*.‘i'
3

1880
1890
1900

44 55 10
44 57 3
44 57 52

69 32 46
69 32 36
69 33 5

Somerset...............
Somerset...............

1910

Ma in e ..........................

88
88
88
88
88

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

L ouisiana ......................

47
14
48
29
45

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

K entucky ......................

40
40
40
40
40

/
26
39
46
51
56

n

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

44 47

69 29 49

Somerset...............
Somerset...............

4.8miles E SE . of Athens post office, Somerset County
4.7 miles E . of Athens post office, Somerset C ou n ty..
4.3 miles E N E . of Athens post office, Somerset
County.
2.3 miles E . b y S. of Canaan post office, Somerset
County.
1.3 miles SE. of Canaan post office, Somerset County.

A nne
A nne
A nne
A nne
A nne

0.8 mile SE. o f Harmans, A nne Arundel County.
0.5 m ile E . of Harmans, A nne Arundel C ou n ty..
0.4 m ile W . by N. o f Harmans, A nne Arundel County
0.9 m ile N W . of Harmans, A nne Arundel C ou n ty. .
2.9 miles N N W . of Harmans, A nne Arundel County

2

4.3 miles N N E . of Bayou Sara. W est Feliciana Parish.
4.0 miles SSE. o f Brandon, W est Feliciana Parish..
2.4 miles N E . of Raccourci, P ointe Coupee P arish...
l .OmileN. b y E. of Raccourci, Pointe Coupee Parish.
4.9 miles NN W . of Raccourci, P ointe Coupee Parish.

18.4
10.8
6.4
7.1
1.7

2.0

2.9
4.3

5.2
14.1
2.3
2.4

2.3

2.0
2.2

1.0 i

14.3 . . . . . . 11.6
.
6.4
8.7 . . . . . . . . . .
3.4
5.4 . . . . . . . . . .
3.7
6.1 . . . . . . . . . .
0.7

2.0 . . . . . . . . . .
2.5 .j . . . . . . . . .
3.9 ! . . . . . . . . .

5.0 . . . . . . . . . . .
0.3
2.3 !
...
1.2 i . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . ;.
. . . . . . . . i.
.........

12.8

1.0

Missouri....................

Montana ........................




76
76
76
76
76

1880

42 22 30

71 28 15

42 22 30

71 28 10

Middlesex.............

42 22 19

71 28

8

Middlesex.............

42 22 23

71 25

8

Middlesex.............

1920

Mississippi.............

69 31

1910

Minnesota .............

44 46 44
39 9 4
39 9 32
39 9 36
39 10 1
39 11 3

42 22 18

71 25 45

Middlesex.............

1R80
1890
1900
1910
1920

43 3 29
43 15 24
43 21 0
43 19 55
43 6 17

84
84
84
84
84

38
43
46
45
24

36
38
19
0
59

5.8 miles N N W . of St. Johns. Clinton C ounty...........
Gratiot.................. 5.5 miles N. b y W . o f Middleton, Gratiot C o u n ty ___
Gratiot.................. 9.2 miles W N W . o f Ithaca, Gratiot C ounty................
7.7 miles W N W . of Ithaca, Gratiot C ounty................
Clinton.................. 10.4 miles N E . o f St. Johns, Clinton C ou n ty...............

14.3
6.8
1.6
23.1

tsan
1890
1900
1910
1920

44
45
45
45
45

47
5
15
22
25

33
42
29
23
26

93
93
93
93
93

U 41
50 36
59 24
51 29
51 1

1.6 miles E .b y S. of Young America, Carver County..
W right.................. 3.6 miles E N E . of Montrose, Wright C ounty............
W right.................. 2.2 miles N. b y E . o f Maple Lake, Wright C o u n ty ..
Sherburne............ 1.9 miles SE. o f Becker, Sherburne C ounty...............
Sherburne............ 2.8 miles N N E. of Becker, Sherburne C ounty............

21. 4
13.3
10. 2
3.5

5.7
0.4
4.2 .

0.6
02
*

1S80
1890
1900
1910
1920

33
35
32
32
32

2
59
55
54
55

50
52
.37
7
35

89
89
89
89

4°
43
44
45
45

6
26
46
22
37

Attala....................
Attala....................
A ttala....................
A ttala....................

4.0 miles
3.5 miles
7.0 miles
8.5 miles
7.0 miles

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

38
38
38
38
38

42
38
36
33
33

92
92
‘92
92

27
25
18
16

57
55
25
23

Moniteau..............
Cole........................
Cole........................
Cole........................

2.6 miles N W . of Marion, Cole C ounty..........................
2.9 miles N W . of Centertown, Cole C ou n ty.................
0.6 mile S W . of Centertown, Cole C ounty....................
6.5 miles W S W . o f Jefferson City, Cole C ou n ty..........
4.0 miles SW . b y W . of Jefferson City, Cole C ou n ty..

1880
1890
1900
1910

46
46
46
46

1920

46 52 36

3°
19
11
0
17
.
03
31 45
34 45
41 31

111 51 22
111 36 18
110 59 49

Jefferson...............
Broadwater..........
Meagher................

110 14

Judith Basin........

2

3.0 miles W . b y S. of Sudbury post office, Middlesex
County.
2.9 miles W . b y S. of Sudbury post office, Middlesex
County.
2.9 miles W SW . o f Sudbury post office, Middlesex
County.
0.5 m ile SSW . of Sudbury post office, Middlesex
County.
0.8 mile SSW . of Sudbury post office, Middlesex
County.

E N E . of Sallis, Attala C ounty.....................
SE. o f Sallis, Attala C ounty.........................
SE. b y S. of Sallis, Attala C ounty..............
S. b y E. of Sallis, Attala C ounty.................
S. b y E . of Sallis, A ttala C ounty.................

19.7 miles SE. of Helena, Lewis and Clark C o u n ty ...
9.3 miles E SE . o f Helena, Lewis and Clark C ou n ty..
19.7 miles E . by N . o f Helena, Lewis and Clark Count v.
9.8 miles N N W . of White Sulphur Springs, Meagher
County.
9.7 miles SW . of Utica, Judith Basin C ou n ty............
1 Parish.

0.5

0.8 :
0.6
1.6

5.6

8.2

2.0
0.2

2.3
2.0
2.8

0.1

.......

...........
...........
...........

1.2

J

l.O

o. i
0.8
0.3
1.0

0.1

0.1

0.2
2 .6

0.4

2.7 1

0.3 ........... !
0.5
0.1

2.6

2.9 L

20-9

Arundel___
Arundel___
Arundel___
Arundel___
Arundel___

24.3

2.3

13.7
6.4

2
17
21
15
36
40

2.1

22.3

12.5

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

41
41
42
42
43

1.6
14.1
0.1

J

0.9

1900

Michigan ...............

3.6
0.7
3.3

2.2

1890

Massachusetts___

1.5
1.7

. . . . . . . . :.

1920
Maryland ......................

0.2

0.2

0.03

2.6

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.5

4.2

15.7

11
.

16.9

4.8
7.2

11.2

6. 4
0.4

7.9
3.5

3.6
5.1
1.8
1. 7
5. 4
3. 1
7.7
1.8

1.3

3. 4
4.9
1.7

4. x
2. 5
3 .7

1.3

0.6
0.2
2 .3
1. 8

............

6. 8
l.S

............
............

1 2 .0

............

3 6 .1

.............

0 .3

11.9
12. 5
30.0

1 0 .0
3. 4

38.3

1 2 .8

2.2

*

6 .4

15

CENTERS AND MEDIAN LINES.
T able 9 .—CENTERS OF POPULATION OF EACH STATE: 1880 TO 1920—Continued.

MOVEMENT IN MILES DURING
PRECEDING DECADE.

APPROXIMATE LOCATION BY IMPORTANT TOWNS.

STATE.

Census
year.

North
latitude.

W est
longitude.
County.

0

,

„

•
97
97
97
97
97

,

„

20
43
42
50
57

43
34
10
17
0

Nevada ..........................

41
55
36
48
41

117
118
117
117
117

59
1
49
33
31

22
46
23
18
23

New H ampshire.........

26 25
26 1
26
1
21 18

71
71
71
71

35
35
34
32

50
23
44
10

71 32

17

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

40 57 47
41 5 54
41 8 43
41 11 13
41 12 32

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

39
39
39
39
39

41
31
51
16
20

1880
1890
1900
1910

43
43
43
43

1920

N ebraska .....................

Nearest city or tow n.

1
From
point
to
North­ South­ East­ West­
point
ward. ward. ward. ward.
in
direct
line.

43 21 30

22.0
3.4
7.7
6.0

Churchill..............
Lander..................

9.3
3.2
2.9
1.5

11.4
25.1
42. 4
4.8

P olk ......................
P o lk ......................

22.6

1.2

11.2
40.0

4.5

2.1

B elknap................ 0.2 mile W . b y S. o f Tilton, Belknap C ounty.............
0.6
0.5
5.8

Merrimack...........

5.4

County.

40 25 48
40 37 19
40 27 54

1880
1890
1900

0.2

1
74 31
74 30 14
74 29 37

1910
1920

North D akota ............

Ohio................................

O

k l a h o m a

................................

9 35
58 19
55 0
49 5
44 34

106 10 35
1
106 9
106 9 41
105 43 8
13
105

1880
1890

42 0 4
41 54 51

74 54 50
74 51

41 48 0
41 39 29
41 36 13

74 45 51
74 51 ,50
74 50 59

1880
1890

35 38 35
35 38 22

79 18 37
79 25 11

35 38

13

79 28 37

1910
1920

North Carolina.........

35
34
34
34
34

1900

New Y ork....................

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

1900
1910
1920

N ew Mexico .................

40 29 24
40 28 19

35 37 23
35 36 48

79 29 49
79 31 27

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

47
47
47
47
47

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1890
1900
1910
1920
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

13.2

3.4
2.0

1.7

0.4
0.5
2.1

0.2

13.2
10.8

0.1

Is

l a n d

.....................

...............




0.7

Chatham.............
Chatham............... 2.5 miles S. 01 Mount Vernon Springs, Chatham
County.
Chatham.............
County.
Chatham............... 3.3 miles E N E . of Cheeks, R andolph C ounty.............
Chatham...............
Chatham County.

53
53
54
48
41

,
!
1
!

IK
30
28
28

44 39 37
44 46 13
44
55 58
44
52 12
44
41
40
40
40
40
40

35 18
35 14
35 50
32 54
32

1880

41 46

77

77

5.1

6.2
5.2

1.5
1.7

Barnes..................
Griggs....................
Foster................... 6.6 miles S W . o f McHenry, Foster C ounty..................
W ells..................... 3.5 miles N E . o f Bowdon* Wells C ounty.’. ...................
W ells.....................

0.2
n 9.
1.0
0.7

1.1
1.5

31.6
17.6
44.7
5.6

an. 5
3 .5

3.1
1.6
7.7
7.8

3.1
1.4
5.3
5.0

17 9.
1.3
5.2

2A

0.1
0.7
5. 6
6.0

30.7
7.9
11.9

13.2
0.3

11.9

L inn......................
18 0
Marion..................
0 9
56 0 : Clackamas............
12 4 I Marion..................
13 33

9.1 miles W SW . o f Detroit, Marion C ounty.................
7.8 miles E N E . o f Detroit, Marion C ounty..................
18.0 miles N E . b v N. o f Detroit, Marion C o u n ty .. ..
10.8 miles N N W . o f Detroit, Marion C ounty...............
21.6 miles SE. o f Marquam, Clackamas C ounty.........

16.5
11.7
13.9
4.2

7.6
11.2

3.4

>
10 • Juniata................. 11.6miles E . b y N .o f Mifflintown, Juniata C ou n ty..
12 30 ■ Juniata................. 9.5 miles E . by N . o f Mifflintown, Juniata C o u n ty ...
! Juniata................. 7.4 miles E N E . o f Mifflintown. Juniata C ounty.........
15
miles SE. b v E. o f Mifflintown, Juniata C ou n ty..
50 ' Juniata.................
18 30 Juniata................. 5.2 miles SE. o f Mifflintown, Juniata C ou n ty.............

71 27 40

46 46

71 27 49

41

47

5

71

27 42

; 41 47 24

71

27 40

41 47 43
47
12
18
2
35

5.2

5.0 miles W S W . o f Bearden, Okfuskee C ou n ty..........
3.3 miles W . o f Meeker. Lincoln C ounty......................
3.0 miles N N E . of M cLoud, Pottawatom ie C ou n ty. .
2.0 miles SSE. of Meeker, Lincoln C ounty...................

41

33 58
33
59
0
2
2

0.6
11.5

Seminole.............
Lincoln.................
Lincoln.................
Lincoln.................

14

34
34
31

1.5
25.1

6.2

25 i Morrow................. 1.5 miles E . b y N. o f Fulton. Morrow C ounty............
36
Morrow................. 7.6 miles E . o f Mount Gilead, Morrow C ounty...........

l
96 28
96 57 32
97 5 28
96 52 48

77
77
77

13.0
3.8
6.8
5.2

3.2

48 i Delaware.............. 3.7 miles E . b y N . o f Kilboum e, Delaware C o u n t y ..
56
Morrow................. 4.9 miles W SW . o f Marengo, Morrow C ounty.............

1880
1X90
1900
1910
1920

KSO
1890
1900
1910
1920

2.5

82
82
82
82
82

1920

a

6.0
7.9
9 .8
3.8

20 17
22 59
24 12
28 48
33 11

1910

South Ca r o l i n

6.5
9.5
11.0
3.9

40
40
! 40
; 40
40

1*»
122
121
122
122

2.9
1.6

Sullivan................ 1.8 miles W . b y N . o f Livingston Manor, Sullivan
County.
Sullivan................ 1.2 miles SW . o f Libertv, Sullivan C ounty.................
Sullivan................ 0.7 m ile N W . b y W . o f Forestine, Sullivan C o u n ty ..
Sullivan................ 3.8 miles S. b y \V. o f Forestine, Sullivan C ou n ty___

37
25
27
47
27

58
25
19
33

1.2

0.7

13.1
3.8
26.0
12.6

9
20
42
39
46

35
35
35
35

10.8

Torrance............... 6.4 miles W . b v S. o f Moriartv. Torrance C ounty___
Bernalillo.............
Torrance............... 19.5 miles E N E . o f Estancia, Torrance C ounty........
Torrance...............

98
98
98
99
99

1900

R hode

Middlesex.............
Middlesex.............

County.
First ward of New Brunswick, Middlesex C ounty. . .

3
35
40
32
43

2
28
31
30
28

1890

Pennsylvania..............

74 26 20
74 24 34

7 1
5.8

11.0
14. 2
1.7

mack County.
New Jersey ..................

19.9

71 26 27

Providence........... 1.1 miles SW. b y S. o f Providence post office, Provideuce C ou n ty.
Providence........... 3.7 miles SW . o f Providence post office, Providence
, County.
Providence........... 3.4 miles SW . o f Providence post office, Providence
i County.
Providence........... 3.1 mil es SW . b y \\ . of Providence post office, Providenee Countv.
Providence........... 2.3 miles SW . o f Providence post office, Providence
County.

80 58 46
Richland.............. 3.1 miles SE. b v E. o f Columbia, Richland C ou n ty..
80 58 50 1 Richland.............. 3.2 miles E SE . o f Columbia, Richland C ounty...........
80 59 49 I Richland.............. i 1.3 miles E. b y N. of Columbia, Richland C o u n ty ...
SI
4 1
Richland............... .3.3 miles N W . o f Columbia. Richland C ounty............
SI 3 42 t Richland.............. 4.0 miles Nt\ . o f Columbia. Richland C ou n ty............

!
2.2
2.4
4.2
1.1

9.7 7

2.4

7.5

! 4.3
4.0 I
1
...........

13.2
1.2

i

0.1

2.2

!
j

3.4
0.9

2.4
0.6

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

1.2

0.4

0.1

1
1
i

0.1
0.02
1.1

,
0.5
1.6
4.5
0.7

0 .5
1.3
2.0
0.6

0.1
0.9
4.0
0.3

16

STATISTICAL ATLAS.
9 .—CENTERS OF POPULATION OF EACH STATE: 1880 TO 1920—Continued.

T able

F 0X
A P P R O3 IM A T E LOCATION B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

STATE.




Census
year.

North
latitude.

West
longitude.
County.

Nearest c ity or tow n .

B eadle...................
Beadle...................
H and. .\...............
B eadle...................

5.0 miles SSW . of W oonsocket, Sanborn C ou n ty........
1.5 miles S. b y E. o f Virgil, B ead leC ou n ty.................
10.0 miles W . b y S. o f Huron, Beadle C o u n ty ............
8.0 miles N . o f Danforth, H and C ounty......................
13.6 miles N W . b y W . o f Virgil, B ead leC ounty........

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

43
44
44
44
44

59
16
21
19
19

28
52
20
48
25

98
98
98
98
98

n
18 4
24 26
25 9
50 6
40 39

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

35
35
35
35
35

50 9
50 7
50 6
49 16
48 53

86
86
86
86
86

38
35
36
33
32

37
58
19
47
1

Rutherford...........
Rutherford...........
Rutherford...........
Rutherford...........

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

31
31
31
31
31

20
26
28
31
28

50
11
35
23
34

96
96
96
97
97

38
50
52
15
19

30
52
26
14
12

6.4 miles S W . o f Thornton, Limestone C ounty..........
Falls...................... 3.0 miles W S W . o f Otto, Falls County.........................
Falls...................... 4.5 m iles N N W . o f O tto, Falls C ounty.........................
McLennan ....... 7.0 miles W S W . o f W aco, McLennan C ounty.............
M cLennan........... 12.1 miles S W . o f W aco, McLennan C ounty...............

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

40
40
40
40
40

13 56
18 53
16 2
23 6
22 19

111
111
111
111
111

54
46
45
47
47

30
47
29
46
4

U tah...................... 26.6 miles W . b y S. o f Provo, U tah C ounty.........
U tah...................... 4.6 miles SSE. o f American Fork, U tah C ounty.
U tah...................... 4.7 m iles W N W . o f P rovo, Utah C ounty................
U tah...................... 1.4 miles E N E . of American Fork, Utah C ounty.
U tah......... ........... 1.5 miles S E . o f American Fork, Utah County—

1880

44

1 45

72 43

5

1890

44

2 38

72 42 48

0

0

1900

44

3

18

1910

44

3

0

1920

44

2 46

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

37
37
37
37
37

34
31
19
5
38

78
78
78
78
78

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

47 5 32
47 15 44
47 19 .50
47 23 6
47 24 5

120
120
120
121
121

1880
1890
1900

38 53 20
38 49 59
38 48 7

80 37 47
80 41 26
80 44 22

1910
1920

38 45 32
38 42 36

80 49 12
80 52 55

1880

1890
1900
1910
1920

43
43
43
43
43

44
53
57
56
55

57
27
29
53
42

89
89
89
89
89

1880
1890
1900
1910
1920

42
42
42
42
42

10
24
32
42
48

48
46
14
0
58

106
106
106
107
106

29
28
26
25
23

72 39

W ashington.........

4.6 miles SE. o f Arrington, W illiamson County........
5.4m ilesN W . b y N . ofR ockvale, Rutherford County
5.6 miles N W . o f Rockvale, Rutherford C ounty........
4.5 miles W . o f Overall, Rutherford C ounty...............
8.4 miles SW . b y W . o f Murfreesboro, Rutherford
County.

3.8 miles S. b y E . o f R oxbury post office, Washing­
ton County.
3.0 miles SE. b y S. o f R oxbury post office, Washing­
ton County.
2.0 miles N W . of Brookfield post office, Orange
County.
2.6 miles S. b y W . o f R oxb u ry post office, Washing­
ton County.
2.9 miles SS w . o f R oxb u ry post office, Washington
County.

1

Orange..................

72 44 56

W ashington.........

72 45

3

W ashington.........

29
33
32
33
30

51
29
54
58
23

Buckingham .......
Buckingham ........
Buckingham ........
Buckingham .......

3.2 miles N N E . o f Arcanum, Buckingham C o u n ty ...
2.9 miles N W . o f Arcanum , B uckingham C ounty.. . .
1.9 m iles W . b y S. o f Arcanum, Buckingham County.
3.5 miles S W . o f Arcanum, Buckingham C ounty___
3.8 miles S. b y E . o f Arcanum, Buckingham County.

36
52
46
4
14

29
30
35
16
24

K ittitas.................
K ittitas.................
K ittitas.................
K ittitas.................

4.3 miles E N E . o f Thorp, Kittitas C ounty..................
5.8 miles E N E . o f R oslyn, Kittitas C ounty.................
7.8 miles N W . of Liberty, Kittitas C ounty..................
12.7 miles N N W . o f R oslyn, Kittitas C ounty.............
17.2 miles N W . b y N . o f R oslyn, Kittitas C ou n ty. . .

17
18
18
14
12

6
22
43
10
46

39 14
36 27
52 39
0 7
54 38

B ra xton ................ 2.5 miles N N E . of Burnsville, Braxton C ounty.........
B raxton................ 2.7 miles S W . o f Burnsville, Braxton County............
B ra xton ................ 1.4 miles W . b y S. o f Delta or Braxton post office,
B raxton County.
B raxton................ 1.8 miles N W . o f Chapel, Braxton County..................
B raxton................ 4.5 miles N W . o f Gassaway, B raxton C ounty.............
Marquette............
Marquette............
Marquette............
Marquette............
Marquette............

3.8 miles SE. o f Montello, Marquette C ounty......... .
2.3 miles W . o f Germania, Marquette C o u n ty .... . . .
5.1 miles W . b y S. o f N eshkoro,M arquette County..
2.2 miles S W . o f Neshkoro, Marquette County.........
2.6 miles S. o f Neshkoro, Marquette C ounty.............

4.7 miles S. b y E . of Leo* Carbon C ounty...............
Carbon.................. 12.3 miles N N W . o f Shirley, Carbon C ounty.. ; . . .
N atrona................ 7.8 miles W . b y S. o f A icova, Natrona C ounty___
N atrona................ 6.8 miles SE. o f Oilcity. Natrona C ou n ty...............
Natrona................ 10.3 miles N E . b y E. o f Oilcity, Natrona C ou n ty.

M O V E M E N T IN M ILE S D U R IN G
PR E C E D IN G D E C A D E .

From
point
to
North­ South. East­ West­
point ward.
ward. ward. ward.
in
direct
line.

20.7
5.1

20.0
5.1

20.6

5.3

1.8

0.6

20.5

7.8

0.4

7.8

2.5
0.3

0.03
0.02

2.5

1.7

0.4

2.6

13.7
3.2

22.6

1.0

6.2
2.8

8.9
3.5
8.3

1.1
1.0

3.2

12.2
1.5
22.4
3.9

3 .2

3.2

5.0
5.7

8.1

3.3
*6.' 9

1.0
0.8

0.3

2.4
1.7

6. 8

1.1
0.6

2.0

0.2
3.1

4.9

0.3

4 .9

0.3

0.3

0.1

3.5
2.5
1.7
3.7

2.5
1.4
1.7

17.2

12.0

8.0

1.2

0.5 !

3.3

1.0

3.3

12.6

11.7
4.7
3 .8

4.6 !

1.1

'iili

7.9

5.1
3.3

3.9

3.3

5.2
4.7

3.0
3.4

4.3
3.3

9.9
4.6
3.9

2.1

1
.1

0.3

4.6
0.7
1.4

1.8

16.3
16.3
12.9
9.2

2.6

16.1

8.6
8.0

11.2

3. 8

1.2

2.4

* .'6
4

13.8

6.4

CENTERS AND MEDIAN LINES.

17

CENTER OF AREA.

CENTER OF FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION.

In connection with the location of the center of
population of the United States, it is of interest to
note also the position of what may be termed the
center of area— that is, the point on which the surface
of continental United States would balance, if it were
a plane of uniform weight per unit of area. This
point is located in northern Kansas, 10 miles north
of Smith Center, the county seat of Smith County,
approximate latitude 39° 55', longitude 98° 50', and
is, therefore, 44' 3 9 " (51.3 miles) north and 12° 6' 45"
(647.4 miles) west of the center of population. Its
location is shown on Plate No. 122 designating the
position of the median lines. This would be the cen­
ter of population, if the population were distributed
evenly over the territory of continental United States.
The Geological Survey, Department of the Interior,
has determined the center of area of each state as
given in Table 10 and as shown on the map on Plate
No. 138.

The movement of the center of the total popula­
tion from census to census is the result o f all migra­
tion, both interstate and foreign. In view of the
change in the character of the foreign immigration
and the large proportion of immigrants who are set­
tling in the cities, the location of the center of foreignborn population and its movement from decade to
decade is a matter of great interest.
On the map on Plate No. 121 the center of total
population at each census from 1790 to 1920 is
indicated, also the location of the center of the foreignborn population from 1880 to 1920. The location of
the center of population and the median point were
discussed on pages 7 to 13. A t the census of 1910,
the center of the foreign-born population was com­
puted from 1880 to 1910, the center of this class of
the population not having been worked at a previous
census.
In 1880 the center of the foreign-born population
was located in Monroe County, Mich., in latitude 41°
49' 5 2 ", longitude 83° 44' 1 7", approximately 15.5
miles northwest of Toledo, Ohio.
In 1890 the center had advanced almost 2° to the
west. The opening of Oklahoma and the increase in
the population of Texas drew the point to the south,
when it was located in latitude 41° 22' 5 " , longitude
85° 23' 17", in Noble County, Ind., approximately^,
54.5 miles southeast o f South Bend.
The falling off in the class of immigrants who settled
in the far Western states is indicated by the change in
the direction of the movement from 1890 to 1900,
for in 1900 the center of the foreign-born population
was located in Defiance County, Ohio, 18 miles north­
west of Defiance, being in latitude 41° 22' 4 8 ", almost
the same latitude as in 1890, and longitude 84° 43' 2 1",
nearly a degree farther east. The eastern movement
was due, as previously stated, to the newer immigra­
tion that settled principally in the large cities of the
East.
In 1910 the center of foreign-born population was
again located in Defiance County, Ohio, about 10.5
miles west of Defiance, in latitude 41° 17' 2 4 ", show­
ing a decided movement south, and in longitude
84° 36' 7 ", showing a further advance toward the
east, but not nearly as great as during the previous
decade. This was undoubtedly due to the great in­
crease in the foreign-born population of California,
which, on account of its great distance from the cen­
ter, has a much greater weight than an equal number
of foreign-born in the Eastern and Middle states.
In 1920 the center of foreign-born population was
located in latitude 41° 3' 4 5 ", longitude 84° 49' 17",
in the eastern part of Allen County, Ind., about

T able

10 . — G e o g r a p h ic

S TA TE .

C e n t e r s op t h e St a t e s .

County.

Approxim ate location.

Alabama.
Arizona..
Arkansas.
California.
Colorado.

Chilton.
Yavapai
Pulaski.
Madera..
P a r k ....

12 miles southwest of Clanton.
4o miles southeast of Prescott.
12 miles northwest of Little R ock.
3d miles northeast of Madera.
30 miles northwest o f Pikes Peak.

Connecticut...............
Delaware....................
District of Columbia.
Florida........................
Georgia.......................

Hartford
K ent___

A t East Berlin.
11 miles east of Dover.
Near com er of 4th and L Streets. N W.
12 miles north-northwest of Brookville.
18 miles southeast of Macon.

Id a h o..
Illinois.
Indiana

Custer.
Logan.
Boone.

Iowa. . .
Kansas.

S tory..
Barton

At Custer.
28 miles northeast of Springfield.
14 miles north-northwest of Indian*
apolis.
5 miles northeast of Ames.
Id miles northeast of Great Bend.

Kentucky____
Louisiana
Maine.............
Maryland-----Massachusetts.

Marion.................
A voyelles...........
Piscataquis.. . . .
Anne A rundel...
Worcester...........

3 miles north-northwest of Lebanon.
3 miles southeast of Marksville.
18 miles north of Dover.
3 miles cast of Codington.
Northern part of city of Worcester.

Michigan..
Minnesota.
Mississippi
Missouri...
Montana..

W exford. . .
('row Wing.
Leake.........
Miller..........
Fergus........

d miles north-northwest of Cadillac.
10 miles southwest of Braincrd.
9 miles west-northwest of Carthage.
20 miles southwest o f Jefferson City.
12 miles west of Lewiston.

Nebraska............
Nevada...............
New Hampshire
New Jersey.........
New M exico.......

Custer...
Lander..
Belknap.
M ercer..
Torrance

10 miles northwest of Broken Bow.
24 miles southeast o f Austin.
3 miles east of Ashland,
d miles southeast of Trenton.
12 miles south-southwest of Willard.

C itrus..
Twiggs.

New Y o r k .......................^M adison ....
North Carolina............... Chatham ...
North Dakota................ j Sheridan...
O h io ............................... 1 Delaware...
Oklahoma........................ Oklahoma.,

6 miles south-southeast of Oneida.
10 miles northwest of Sanford.
2d miles northeast of Washburn.
2d miles north-northeast of Columbus.
■ miles north of Oklahoma City.
S

Oregon...............
Pennsylvania.,
Rhode Island...
South Carolina.
South D a k ota ..

Crook____
Centre___
Kent.......
Richland.
H u g h es..

2d miles south-southeast of Princvillc.
2$ miles southwest of Bellefonte.
1 mile south-southwest of Crompton.
13 miles southeast of Columbia,
s miles northeast of Pierre.

Tennessee.
Texas........
t’ tah.........
V erm ont..
Virginia...

Rutherford..
M cCulloch..
Sanpete........
Washington.
Appom attox

5 miles northeast of Murfreesboro.
20 miles northeast of Brady.
3 miles north of Manti.
3 miles east of Roxbury.
11 miles east-southeast of Amherst.

Washington. . .
West Virginia.
Wisconsin.......
W yom ing........

Chelan.........
Braxton.......
W ood ...........
Frem ont___




10 miles west-southwest of WeDatchee.
4 miles east of Sutton.
9 miles southeast of Marshfield.
1 5S miles east-northeast of Lander.

18

S T A T IS T IC A L A T L A S.

10.8 miles east of New Haven and 16 miles east of
Fort Wayne. For the first time in three decades the
center of foreign-born population showed a west­
ern movement. From 1890 to 1900 it moved 35.6
miles in a northeasterly direction, and from 1900 to
1910, 8.2 miles in a southeasterly direction. At the
latter censuses the center was located in Defiance
County, Ohio, but in 1920 it moved just across the state
boundary line into Allen County, Ind. The center in
1880 was located in Monroe County, Mich.', and in
1890 in Noble County, Ind., so that in 30 years the
center has returned to the state in which it was lo­
cated in 1890.
The change in direction of the movement of this
center from east to west is due principally to the in­
crease in foreign-bom white population in the state

of California. The total increase in the foreign-born
white population of the United States was 367,209
and the increase in the states of Texas, California, and
Arizona was 316,222, or 86 per cent of the total in­
crease. Of the 20 states showing an increase in this
element of their population from 1910 to 1920, 12
were located east of the meridian on which the center
was located in 1920, and 7 were west, while 1 state,
Michigan, is divided by the meridian. The states
west of the meridian, however, had much greater in­
creases in their foreign-born white population than
the states east; the largest increases were in Cali­
fornia, Michigan, and Texas.
The following table gives the center of foreign-born
population at each census, and its movement in miles,
also the location in relation to a city:

T able 11.—CENTER OF FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION: 1880 TO 1920.

M O V E M E N T IN M ILE S D U R IN G
P R ECED IN G D E C A D E .

CEN SU S Y E A R .

North
latitude.

West
longitude.

A P P R O X IM A T E LO C A T IO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

|
From
point to
South­
point in East- i West- j North­
direct ward. j ward, j ward. ward.
line.

O / /
/
1880.........................................
1890.........................................
1900.........................................
1910.........................................
1920.........................................

41
41
41
41
41

49
22
22
17
3

52
5
48
24
45

83
85
84
84
84

44 17
23 17
43 21
36 7
49 17

i

In
In
In
In

N oble County^ In d ., 54.5 m iles southeast o f South B end, I n d ...........
Defiance County, Ohio, 18 m iles northwest o f Defiance, O hio...........
Defiance County, Ohio, 10.5 miles southwest o f Defiance, O h io........
Allen County, In d ., 10.8 m iles east o f New H aven, I n d ......................

CENTER OF NEGRO POPULATION.
The question of negro migration has always been
one of great interest and, on the map on Plate 121,
the location of the center of negro population of
continental United States is indicated. The center
of negro population was computed for 1790 and for
each census from 1880 to 1920, no computations being
made for the censuses from 1800 to 1870, inclusive.
The movement of the center of negro population is
an accurate index of the direction of negro migration.
In 1790 the center of negro population was located in
Dinwiddie County, Va., 25 miles west-southwest of
Petersburg, in latitude 37° 4' 8 " north, and longitude
77° 51' 2 1" west. In 1880 the center was located in
northwestern Georgia, 10.4 miles east of Lafayette, in
the eastern part of Walker County, latitude 34° 42' 14"
north, longitude 85° 6' 5 6 " west. From 1880 to 1890
the southwesterly movement of the center was con­
tinued, and it advanced 20.1 miles, to a point in
Walker County, Ga., 10.5 miles southwest of Lafayette,
latitude 34° 36' 18" north, longitude 85° 26' 4 9 " west,
about 4 miles east of the Alabama line. In 100 years
it had moved southwest 463 miles, an average of
46 miles for each decade. From 1890 to 1900 its
movement was greatly retarded, and it advanced only




91.6
35.6
8.2
18.9

85.8 ............. i 3 2 . 6
34.6 .............'
8.2 ............
6.2
5.4 .............................
11.5 ;............. ] 15.0
;
i

9.1 miles southwest, across the Alabama-Georgia
state line into Dekalb County, Ala., 10.7 miles north­
east of Fort Payne, in northeastern Alabama, about
4 miles west of the Georgia line, latitude 34° 31' 16"
north, longitude 85° 34' 3 5 " west. In 1910 the center
of negro population was located 5.4 miles northnortheast of Fort Payne, Dekalb County, Ala., in
latitude 34° 30' 0 " north, and longitude 85° 40' 4 3 "
west, its movement for the decade being 6.0 miles
west-southwest. Its movement south was evidently
greatly retarded by the migration of the negroes to
the Northern and Eastern states. A study of the
movement from 1790 to 1910 shows a steady advance
in a southwesterly direction, but the distance covered
at each decade is much smaller than the movement at
the previous decade. In 1920 it moved back across
the state line into Georgia and was located in latitude
34° 46' 52", and longitude 85° 30' 4 8", the eastern
movement being 9' 55", or approximately 9.4 miles,
and the northern movement being 16' 52", or 19.4
miles. Its location was approximately 1.8 miles
north-northeast of Rising Fawn town, Dade County,
Ga. For the first time in the history7 of the country,
the center of negro population has moved northeast,
its former movements having been in a southwesterly
direction; this northeasterly movement was due prin­

19

CENTERS AN D M E D IA N LIN ES.
cipally to the great increase in the negro population of
Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, and
Michigan. The total increase in the negro population
of the United States was 635,368, and it will be noted
that the increase in the Northern states mentioned
was 56 per cent of the total increase. This hegira
north of the negro population was due mainly to the
expansion of certain industries during the World War,
T able

the high wages paid being the great attraction. It is
probably true that this movement has been continued,
due to the reduction of the cotton crop and the
demand for common labor at higher wages in the
North.
In the following table is given the latitude and longi­
tude of the center of negro population at each census,
also the distance moved during the decade, and the
location of the center relative to a city or town:

1 2 .— CENTER OF NEGRO POPULATION: 1790 AND 1880 TO 1920.

M O V E M E N T IN M ILE S D U R IN G
PR E C E D IN G D E C A D E .

North
latitude.

CENSUS Y E A R .

1790.
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920.

.

37
34
34
34
34
34

4 8
42 14
36 18
31 16
30 0
46 52

West
longitude.

77
85
85
85
85
85

51
6
26
34
40
30

21
56
49
35
43
48

A P P R O X IM A T E LO C A TIO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

25 miles west-southwest o f Petersburg, Dinwiddie County, V a ..............
10.4 miles east of Lafayette, W alker County, Ga ......... ' ' ..........
10.5 miles south west of Lafayette. W alker County, Ga...........................
10.7 miles northeast o f Fort Pavne, Dekalb County, A la........................
5.4 m i'os north-northeast o f Fort Pavne, Dekalb County, A la ...............
1.8 miles north-northeast o f Rising Pawn, Dade County, Ga..................

From
point to
East­
point in ward.
direct
line.

» 444.5
20.1
9.1
6.0
21.6

North­ South­
ward. ward.

1413.5
18.9
7.02
5.8
9.4

West­
ward.

1163.1
6.8
5.8
1.5
19.4

i Movement from 1790 to 1880.

C E N T E R S O F U R B A N A N D R U R A L P O P U L A T IO N .

On Plate 121, in addition to centers of total and
foreign-born population, are indicated the locations
of the centers of urban and rural population in 1910
and 1920. As the centers of urban and rural popula­
tion were not computed for previous censuses, no
statement can be made as to the distance or direction
in which these centers moved from 1900 to 1910 or
during any previous decade. In 1910 not only was
the center of urban population located, but the center
of rural population was also ascertained—that is,
the population excluding all places with 2,500 or
more inhabitants in 1910, as well as the New England
towns of that sizo. The center of urban population
"a s located in 1910 in latitude 40° 16' 12” and
longitude 83° 59' 22” , in Champaign County, Oliio,
15.3 miles northeast of Piqua, Miami County, Ohio.
In 1920 the center of urban population was located in
latitude 40° 5' 7” and longitude 84° 40' 53” , in Darke
County, Ohio, 2.8 miles west-southwest of Greenville
city.
In 1910 the center of rural population was located
in latitude 38°. 12' 36” and longitude 88° 39' 3 ” , in
Hamilton County, 111., 10.7 miles southeast of Mount
Vernon. Jefferson County, 111. In 1920 the center of
rural population was located in latitude 38° 12' 31”




and longitude 88° 49' 22” , in Jefferson County, 111.,
8.5 miles southeast of Mount Vernon.
The location of these centers shows strikingly the
preponderance of urban population in the north­
eastern portion of the United States, the center of
i urban population in 1920 being approximately 129.5
miles north and 225.4 miles east of the center of rural
population. In a direct line the center of urban
population was 260 miles northeast from the center of
rural population.
From 1910 to 1920 the center of urban population
moved 12.7 miles south and 36.7 miles west. Duiing
| the same period the center of rural population moved
■ 0.1 of a mile south and 9.4 miles west. The greater
westward movement of the center of urban population
is surprising, but it is probably due to the decrease in
the number of immigrants, who usually settle in the
eastern cities. The movement of the center of rural
; population west is significant as it is due to a decrease
i in the rural population of the east and a fair increase in
! the west. The increase in the rural population of the
| Mountain, Pacific, and West South Central divisions
| was the principal factor in the westward movement.
,
The latitude and longitude of these centers at each
census, also the distance moved during the decade,
and the location of the center relative to a citj- or
town, are given in Tables 13 and 14.

20

S T A T IS T IC A L A T L A S.
T able

1 3 .—CENTER OF URBAN POPULATION: 1910 AND 1920.
M O V E M E N T IN M IL E S D U R IN G
PR E C E D IN G D E C A D E .

CEN SU S T E A S .

1910.........................................................
1920.........................................................

North
latitude.

40 16 12
40 5 7

T

able

West
longitude.

0
l
II
83 59 22
84 40 53

A P P R O X IM A T E LO C A T IO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

2.8 miles west-southwest of Greenville, Darke County, O h io..................

From
point to West­
point in ward.
direct
line.

38.8

36.7

North­ South­
ward. ward.

12.7

1 4 . — CENTER OF RURAL POPULATION: 1910 AND 1920.
M O V E M E N T IN M ILE S D U R IN G
P R ECED IN G D E C A D E .

C E N SU S Y E A R .

North
latitude.

West
longitude.

o

1910.........................................................

38

12 36

1920.......................................... .............

38 12 31

88 39

n
3

A P P R O X IM A T E LO C A TIO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

North­ South­
ward. ward.

In H am ilton County, HI., 16.7 miles southeast of Mount Vernon, Jeffer­
son County. 111.

88 49 22

CENTERS OF AGRICULTURE.
The map on Plate 137 shows the location of center
of population from 1790 to 1920, and the centers of
the number of farms, total area in farms, improved
acreage, farm values, agricultural products, and
manufactures, from 1850 to 1920, and may be desig­
nated as a chart of the progress of the Nation, repre­
senting, as it does, the westward movement of popula­
tion, agriculture, and manufactures.
CEN TER OF N U M BER OF FA RM S.

The center of the number of farms in 1850 was
located on the Ohio River, between Ohio and the
present state of West Virginia, at nearly the same
point as the center of corn production. From this
position the center of the number of farms moved 116.8
miles in a northwesterly direction, and in 1860 reached
a point 13 miles southeast of Xenia, Ohio. From 1860
to 1870 the center advanced 20.8 miles almost directly
south to a position in Brown County, 31 miles east-north­
east of Cincinnati, Ohio. From 1870 to 1880 the dis­
tance covered was 36.7 miles in a southwesterly direc­
tion across the Ohio River into Kentucky to a point
20 miles south by east of Newport. From 1880 to
1890 its progress of 100.1 miles was nearly due west
into Indiana. From 1890 to 1900 it moved in a south­
westerly direction 109.4 miles to a point 10 miles
southeast of Fairfield, Wayne County, 111. From
1900 to 1910 the center moved'west-southwest 43.2
miles to a point 6.6 miles north-northwest of Benton,
Franklin County, 111. From 1910 to 1920 the south­
western movement was continued and the center ad­
vanced 25.9 miles and was located 4.2 miles south­
west of Pinckneyville, Perry County, 111.




From
point to
West­
point in
direct ward.
line.

9.4

9.4

0 .1

CEN TER OF TOTAL FA R M AREA.

The center of the number of acres of farm land, or
total area in farms, in 1850 was located in Owsley
County, K y., the farthest south of any center shown
on the map except the center of cotton production.
From 1850 to 1870 it moved to a point 55 miles east
by north of Evansville, Ind. From 1870 to 1880 it
advanced in a westerly direction to a position 7.3
miles northeast of Carmi, 111. From 1880 to 1890
it moved northwest across the state of Illinois to a
point 6 miles north by west of Alton, 111., its next
movement being southwest to a location about 48
miles southwest of Jefferson City, Mo. The center of
total farm area has not been computed since 1900.
C E N T E R O F IM P R O V E D A C R E A G E .

The center of improved acreage was first computed
in 1900 when it was located in Pike County, 111., 14
miles southeast by south of Pittsfield, in Pike County,
111. From 1900 to 1910 it moved 65.1 miles, almost
directly west to a point 9.2 miles east-northeast o f
Paris, Monroe County, Mo. From 1910 to 1920 its
movement was northwest 47.8 miles to a point 3.8
miles south-southwest of New Cambria, Macon
Comity, Mo.
C E N T E R O F VALU E O F F A R M P R O P E R T Y .

The center of the value of farm property, which in
1850 was located 13 miles northwest of Clarksburg, in
the present state of West Virginia, in 1860 had ad­
vanced south and west to a point 14 miles northwest
of Portsmouth, Ohio. From 1860 to 1870 its move­
ment was northwest to a position 13 miles northwest
of Urbana, Ohio. From 1870 to 1900 it moved west

CEN TERS A N D M E D IA N LIN ES.

21

in a straight line across Indiana and Illinois to a l from 1900 to 1920 it moved almost directly east
point in Cass County, 16 miles north-northwest of to a point 2.8 miles southeast of Hettick, Macoupin
Jacksonville, Morgan County, 111. Its greatest west­
County, 111.; the movement was only 24.9 miles.
ward movement, and the greatest advance made for
C E N T E R O F W H E A T P R O D U C T IO N .
any decade, approximately 175 miles, was from 1880
The center of wheat production has made a greater
to 1890.
The center of value of farm property advanced, western and northern movement than any other
from 1900 to 1910, 103.6 miles directly west and was center, as will be noted from its location in 1900. Its
located 14 miles south-southwest of Edina, Knox greatest southern advance was made from 1880 to
1890, and its greatest northern movement from 1890
County, Mo. This is not as great an advance as from
1880 to 1890, nor from 1850 to 1860, but is the third to 1900. . The center of wheat production was not
computed in 1910, but from 1900 to 1920 it moved in
largest western advance it has made. From 1910 to
a southwesterly direction 81.7 miles, to a point 3.2
1920 it advanced 45.1 miles in a westerly direction
miles east of Hamburg, Fremont County, Iowa.
to a point 3.6 miles northeast of Linneus, Linn County,
Mo.
C E N T E R OF O A T S P R O D U C T IO N .
C E N T E R O F P R O D U C T IO N O F C ER E ALS.

The center of coreals, comprising corn, wheat, oats,
barley, buckwheat, and rye, was first computed in
1900 when it was located 6 miles south of Warsaw, in
Hancock County, 111. From 1900 to 1910 it moved
28.6 miles north-northwest to a point 19.1 miles west
of Fort Madison, in Lee County, Iowa. From 1910 to
1920 it moved 46.6 miles southwest to a point 4 miles
south of Edina, in Knox County, Mo.
C E N T E R O F C O R N P R O D U C T IO N .

The center of corn production has moved in a west­
erly direction, but more rapidly than the center of
population, as from 1850 to 1860 it moved south of
west 271.7 miles, the distance traversed being greater
than the entiro western movement of the center of
population from 1850 to 1900. Its movement from
1860 to 1870 and from 1870 to 1880 was almost
directly northwest. From 1880 to 1890 it advanced
south of west to a point 2 miles southwest of Carroll­
ton, III. The movement from 1890 to 1900 was so
slight that it could hardly be indicated on the map,
being only 17" west and 2' 3 6" north. The center
of corn production was not computed in 1910, but




The other agricultural centers have moved in various
erratic courses, but always in a general westerly direc­
tion, except the center of oats production, which from
1850 to 1860 moved north and east. From 1860 to
1890 the center of oats production moved almost due
west along the forty-first parallel of latitude. From
1890 to 1900 its course was northwest to a point 8
miles west of south of Tipton, Iowa. Its greatest
movement w from 1860 to 1870, approximately 244
ras
miles. As the center of oats production was not com­
puted in 1910, the movement is given from 1900 to
1920. At the latter date it was located 3.7 miles
north-northwest of Hedrick, Keokuk County, Iow-a, a
movement of 69.8 miles. Since 1900 the general direc­
tion of the movement has been southwest.
The movements of the centers of the number of
farms, value of farm property, area in farms, and of
oats, com, and wheat production, as indicated on the
map, are widely divergent.
The latitude and longitude of these centers at each
census, also the distance moved during the decade,
and the location of the center relative to a city or
town, are given in Table 15.

22

S T A T IS T IC A L A T L A S.
1 5 .— POSITIONS OF THE CENTERS OF AGRICULTURE: 1850 TO 1920.

T able

M 0 Y E M E N F IN M IU ES D U R IN G
PRECE D IN G DE C A D E .

North
latitude.

CE N SU S Y E A R .

West
longitude.

From
point to
point in East­
direct ward.
line.

A P P R O X IM A T E LO C A TIO N B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

West­
ward.

North- ^
South­
ward. | ward.

N U M BER OF FARM S.

1850 .
1800.........................................
1870 ..................
..
1880.....................
1890.........................................
1900 ..................
1910.........................................
1920.......................
...

39
39
39
38
38
38
38
38

14
29
11
48
38
17
4
1

54
38
48
30
21
0
12
41

<
81
83
83
84
86
88
88
89

43
52
56
24
14
12
57
25

38
36
44
30
46
30
33
49

1850.
1860.......................
1870.......................
1880.......................
1890.......................
1900.......................

37
37
38
38
38
38

26
41
5
8
58
11

20
1
19
28
22
36

83
85
86
88
90
92

36
54
34
2
11
50

22
30
17
43
44
19

116.8
20.8
36.7

115.6
3.7

109.4
43.2

.............
.............
25.9 .............

.............
38.2 !.............
80.4 .............
129. 2 i_______
153.6

126.2
26.1
80.3
115.8
143.9

26.8
11.7
24.5
14.7
2.9

25.0
99.4
106.6
40.6
25.7

127.3

IS. 9
20.5

100.1

T O T A L A R E A IN F A R M S .
...

16.9
27.9
3.6
57.4
53.8

IM P R O V E D A C R E A G E .
1900...................
1910.......................
1920.......................

39 26 20
39 31 12
39 38 21

90 39 20
91 52 13
92 45 11

65.1
47.8

64.9

5.6
47.1

152.3
97.1
100.5

148.3
33.0
100.3

8.2

V ALU E O F F A R M P R O P E R T Y .
1850.........................................
1860......................
.
1870.......................
.
1880.........................................
1890..................................
1900.....................................
1910..........................
1920.......................... .............

39
38
40
40
39
39
39
39

25 53
55 39
2
8 26
58 4
57 48
57 0
24

80
83
83
85
89
90
92
93

28
13
51
44
2
21
18
9

33
39
8
46
15
35
36
34

175.1

34.8
91.3
7.6
11.9
0.3
0.9
1.8

174. 7
70.2

103.6

70.2
103.6
45.1

45.1
G R O S S F A R M IN C O M E .

1900.....................................

39 IS 47

90 33

1900.....................................
1910..........................
1920.......................

40 16 13
40 37 48
40 3 53

91 25 10
91 41 36
92 10 37

10
P R O D U C T IO N O F C ER E ALS.
6 miles south o f W arsaw, in H ancock Countv. HI....................
28.6

14.4
46.6

25.6

271.7
66.1
111.5
71.8
3.01
1 24.9

258.5
40.7
101.1
70.7
0.3

24.8

39.6

P R O D U C T IO N O F C O R N .
1850.......................
1860..................
1870.............
1880................
1890...........
1900.........
1920.......................

o
54
13
12
57
33
33

81
86
87
89
90
90
89

47
29
14
7
26
27
59

0
4
15
43
49
6
12

3.5 miles northwest of Springfield, in Greene County, 111.........................
2.8 miles southeast of Hettick, in Macoupin Countyj 111...........................

14 18
59
39 17
36 14
33 53
39 19
36 20

81
86
88
90
93
94
95

58 49
38
48 40
30 46
9 18
59 23
42 39

57 miles east-northeast o f Columbus, in Coshocton County, O hio...........
13.5 miles north b v east of Indianapolis, in H amilton County, In d ___
74 miles northeast of Springfield, in McLean County, 111.........................
69 miles northwest of Springfield, in McDonough County, 111...............
10 miles north b y west of B hinswick, in Chariton County, M o.............
70 miles west of Des Moines, in A udubon County, Iow a..........................
3.2 miles east of Hamburg, in Fremont County, Iowa...............................

39 7
38
38 47
39 ?8
39
39 19
39 20

86 miles east-southeast o f Columbus A n Meigs C ounty, O hio..................
17.5 miles north of Hardinsburg, in Breckinridge County, K y ...............
90 miles southwest of Indianapolis, in Daviess County, In d ...................
36 miles southeast of Springfield, in Christian C ounty, 111.......................

i 24.9

52 1
47.1

83.9
12.9

>i .i

P R O D U C T IO N O F W H E A T .
1850.......................
1860..........................
1870......................
1880...................
1890.....................................
1900......................
.
1920...................

40
, 39
i 40
40
39
i 41
40

214 7

215.3
153.1
89.6

45.2
80 8

..

1.38 4
i ok n
i 37.9

172.6
»81.7

144.2

3.5
71.7
i 72.4

P R O D U C T IO N O F O A T S .
1830..................................
1860......................
1870.....................................
1880.......................
1890.......................
1900.....................................
1920.............................




39 43 22
41 n 38
40 59 13
41 10 43
41 39
41 12 27
'i

81 35 29
81 2 5
85 42 40
37
87
52
89
n
91
92 20 21

I

80 miles east-southeast of Columbus, in N oble County, Ohio..................
48 miles southeast o f Cleveland, in Portage County. Ohio........................
30 miles west b y south o f Fort W ayne, in Wabash Comity, Ind.............
6 miles northwest o f Rensselaer, in Jasper County, I n d ......................
39 miles north-northeast o f Peoria, in Stark County, 111..........................
8 miles west of south of Tipton, in Cedar County, Iow a.......................
3.7 miles north-northwest o f Hedrick, in Keokuk County, Iowa..........
-

1 Movement from 1900 to 1920.

93.3
244.0
79.2
133.3
77.3
1 69.8
i

29.1

88.6

32.6
» 62^7

6.3

i 30.8

CENTERS AN D M E D IA N LIN ES.
C E N T E R O F C O T T O N P R O D U C T IO N .

The location of the center of cotton production is
indicated in Table 16 and on the map, Plate No. 137,
for the years 1859, 1879, 1899, 1906, 1910, 1914,
1916, 1918, and 1919. The center in 1879 showed
a movement almost directly north from that of
1859. From 1879 to 1906 the movement was in a
southwesterly direction, but since 1906 the move­
ment has been very irregular. In 1910 it moved
northeast; in 1914 the movement was almost reversed
and it moved directly south; from 1914 to 1916 it
moved in a northwesterly direction; from 1916 to 1918
it moved directly east, to a point almost 20 miles west
of its location in 1879; from 1918 to 1919 it again
moved northwest about 75 miles, to a point 5.6 miles
northeast of Greenwood, Leflore County, Miss., the
highest northern latitude since 1859, when it was
located in the eastern part of Mississippi, near the
Alabama line.
It will be noted that all of these centers are in the
state of Mississippi, and have practically crossed the
state from its eastern to its western boundary. It is
undoubtedly due to the destruction caused by the
boll weevil that the center of cotton in 1919 was
located so much farther north than its location in
1859 or in any subsequent year.
T a b l e 1(5.— P o s it io n o f t h e ( ' e n t e r o f C o t t o n P r o d u c t io n .

Ce n s u s y e a r .

'

Approxim ate location b y important (owns.

'V)9..................... 13 miles southeast of Macon, in Noxubee County, Miss.
i*S79....................... n miles south of Columbus, in Lowndes County, Miss.
1899......................1 13 miles southeast of Lexington, in Holmes County, Miss.
1906......................
miles northeast of Mayersville, in Issaquena County, Miss.
1910.................... 3 miles southwest of Vaiden, in Carroll County, Miss.
•914..................... 1 mile northwest of Sharpsburg, in Madison County, Miss.
•916...................... 16 miles southeast of Areola, in Washington County, Miss.
1918 . . . . . . 6 miles southeast. of Sturgis, . in i Oktibbeha County, Miss.
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
1919 .................. s.s miles northeast of Greenwood, in Leflore County, Miss.

CENTER OF MANUFACTURES.
In order to ascertain the position of the center of
manufactures at each census from 1850 to 1920,
except in 1910, as shown on page 24, the gross value
of products was distributed by square degrees, and
the remainder of the computations made as in com­
puting the center of population. The center of manu­
factures, therefore, is really the center of the value of
its gross products, and, as the value of products is
representative of the industry, so the movement of
the center of manufactures, during each decade, can
be considered as the movement of the entire industry.
On Plate 137 is a sketch map on which is indicated,
by symbols, the location of the center of manufac­
tures at each census from 1850 to 1900 and 1920, and




23

the center of population from 1790 to 1920, bringing
out clearly the steady westward movement of both
manufactures and population.
The center of manufactures in 1850 was in Penn­
sylvania, 7.5 miles north by west of Mifflintown, and the
center of population at the same census was located 23
miles southeast of Parkersburg, in the present state of
West Virginia, 240 miles southwest of the center of
manufactures. In 1860 the center of population had
advanced 80.6 miles nearly due west, while the center
of manufactures had moved in a westerly direction
100.2 miles. From 1860 to 1870 the center of popu­
lation moved 44.1 miles north of west, while the
center of manufactures moved slightly west of north
17.4 miles. From 1870 to 1880 the center of population
moved south and west 58.1 miles, while the center of
manufactures moved north and west 23.7 miles. From
1880 to 1890 the center of population moved slightly
north of west 48.6 miles, while the center of manufac­
tures moved south of west nearly twice that distance.
From 1890 to 1900 the center of population moved
almost due west 14.6 miles, and the center of manu­
factures in a line almost parallel nearly 40 miles,
or over twice the westward movement of the center of
population. In general, the center of manufactures
has followed the center of population in its westward
movement, but not always along parallel lines, the
greatest variations noted being from 1860 to 1870
and 1870 to 1880. From 1850 to 1860, 1880 to 1890,
and 1890 to 1900, the center of manufactures made a
greater western advance than the center of population.
The value of products of manufactures was not
tabulated by counties at the census of 1910, therefore,
it was impossible to compute the center for that cen­
sus. In 1920 the center of manufactures was located
in latitude 40° 28' 13" and longitude 83° 40' 0 ", 0.7
of a mile north of Rushsylvania, Logan County, Ohio.
The point was, therefore, located 71.9 miles west and
9.6 miles south of the center of manufactures in 1900.
As the center of population progressed but 48.6 miles
west, from 1900 to 1920, and the center of manufac­
tures 71.9 miles west, the center of manufactures made
a greater western advance than the center of popula­
tion, due principally to the great increase in the value
of products of manufactures in the Pacific Coast
states in 1920, as compared with 1900. The move­
ment of the center of manufactures from 1850 to 1920
was 329.2 miles, while the movement of the center
of population during the same period was 290.2 miles,
! indicating that the movements of manufactures and
| population are closely related. In 1920 the latitude

24

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

of the center of manufactures was 1° 17' 52" north
of the center of population, approximately 89.5 miles,
and east 3° 3' 15", or 162.5 miles.
In order to show the relation between the total value
of products and the number of wage earners the center
of the number of wage earners was computed for
the first time in 1920, and was located at latitude
40° 22' 4 8" and longitude 82° 39' 32", 1° 0' 2 8", or
T

able

53.2 miles east, and 5' 25", or 6.2 miles, south of the
center of the total value of products.
The latitude and longitude of these centers, and
the location of each center relative to a city or town,
at each census, are given in Table 17, as well as the
distance that the center of the value of products
moved from census to census.

1 7 .— POSITIONS OF T H E CEN TERS OF M AN U FACTU RES: 1850 TO 1900 AN D 1920.
M O VE K E N T IN M ILES D UR IN G
P RE C E D IN G DECAD E.

North
latitude.

West
longitude.

1850.........................................
1860......................
1870........................................
1880........................................
1890
1900
1920.........................................

40
40
40
40
40
40
40

77
79
79
79
81
82
83

1920...................

40 22 48

CENSUS Y E A R .

A P P R O X IM A T E LOCATION B Y IM P O R T A N T T O W N S .

From
point to
West- N orth­ South­
point in ward. ; ward. ward.
1direct
line.

VALUE O F P R O D U C T S .
41
33
47
50
42
36
28

42
1
13
9
22
36
13

25 9
18 50
25 58
53 0
33 37
18 7
40 0

102
0.

17. 4
23. 7
8. 4
8
39. 4
i 72. 5

99. 7 .
62
.
23. 6
8. 0 :
8
39 0
i 71.9

A V E R A G E N U M B E R OF W A G E E A R N E R S.




82 39 32
i
* M ovem ent from 1900 to 1920.

i

.

..
16. 3
2. 4

1 .0
0
9.6
5.8
9.6




POPULATION
PLATES 1-238

POPULATION.

P late
N o.

1
2
3
4
5
6

7

9

10

11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

T itle .

United States, original area and acquisitions of territory:
1790-1920 (map).
Geographic divisions: 1920 (map).
Rural population per square mile, by counties: 1920 (map).
Rural population per square mile, by counties: 1Q10 (map).
Per cent of increase or decrease in total population, by
counties: 1910-1920 (map).
Per cent of increase or decrease in total population, by
counties: 1900-1910 (map).
1. Per cent of increase or decrease in total population,
(
by states: 1910-1920 (map).
2. Per cent of increase or decrease in total population, by
.
states: 1900-1910 (map).
1. Per cent of increase or decrease in total population, by
states: 1890-1900 (map).
2. Per cent of increase or decrease in total population, by
.
states: 1880-1890 (map).
_
1. Total population, by geographic divisions: 1920 and
1910.
2. Distribution of the per cent of increase in total popu­
lation, by geographic divisions: 1910-1920 and 1900­
1910.
3. Increase in population, by geographic divisions: 1910­
1920.
4. Per cent of increase in total population of the United
States and each geographic division: 1910-1920 and
1900-1910.
1. Growth of population in area enumerated in 1790, with
growth in remainder of country: 1790-1920.
2. Comparison of rate o f increase in total population with
rate of change of immigration: 1850-1920.
1. Counties in which population decreased: 1910-1920
(map).
•
2. Counties in which population decreased: 1880-1920
.
(map).
1. Total population, by states: 1920 and 1910.
2. Per cent of increase in total population, by states:
1910-1920 and 1900-1910.
Per cent of increase or decrease in population, by counties:
1910-1920 (maps)—•
Alabama (total and rural).
Arizona (total and rural).
Arkansas (total and rural).
California (total and rural).
Colorado (total and rural).
Connecticut (total and rural).
Delaware (total and rural).
District of Columbia (total 1900-1910 and 1910-1920).
Florida (total and rural).
Georgia (total and rural).
Idaho (total and rural).
Illinois (total and rural).
Indiana (total and rural).
Iowa (total and rural).
Kansas (total and rural).
Kentucky (total and rural).
Louisiana (total and rural).
Maine (total and rural).
Maryland (total and rural).
(26)




P late
N o.

32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63

64
65

66

67
68
69

70

T itle .

Massachusetts (total).
New Hampshire (total).

{

Rhode Island (total).
Michigan (total and rural).
Minnesota (total and rural).
Mississippi (total and rural).
Missouri (total and rural).
Montana (total and rural).
Nebraska (total and rural).
Nevada (total and rural).
New Jersey (total and rural).
New Mexico (total and rural).
New York (total and rural).
North Carolina (total and rural).
North Dakota (total and rural).
Ohio (total and rural).
Oklahoma (total and rural).
Oregon (total and rural).
Pennsylvania (total and rural).
South Carolina (total and rural).
South Dakota (total and rural).
Tennessee (total and rural).
Texas (total).
Texas (rural).
Utah (total and rural).
Vermont (total and rural).
Virginia (total and rural).
Washington (total and rural).
West Virginia (total and rural).
Wisconsin (total and rural).
Wyoming (total and rural).
Alaska, judicial districts: 1920 (map).
Per cent of increase or decrease in population of Hawaii
(total), by counties: 1910-1920 (map).
Per cent of increase or decrease in population of Porto
Rico (total), by municipalities: 1910-1920 (map).
Towns (shaded) showing decrease: 1910-1920 (maps) —
Maine,
fVermont.
[New Hampshire.
Increase or decrease in population of counties: 1900-1920
(maps)—
Nevada.
Iowa.
Missouri.
Mississippi.
Delaware.
Maine.
Vermont.
New Hampshire.
Population per square mile, by counties:
1920 (map).
Population per square mile, by counties:
1910 (map).
1. Population per square mile, by states:
1920 (map).
2. Population per square mile, by states:
.
1910 (map).

27

POPULATION.
PLATE

No.

T it l e .

1. Population per square mile, by states: 1900 (map).
71
2.
Population per square mile, by states: 1890 (map).
Density of population, by counties: 1920 (maps) —
72 Alabama (total and rural).
73 Arizona (total and rural).
74 Arkansas (total and rural).
75 California (total and rural).
76 Colorado (total aud rural).
77 Connecticut (total and rural).
78 Delaware (total and rural).
79 Florida (total and rural).
80 Georgia (total and rural).
81 Idaho (total and rural).
82 Illinois (total and rural).
83 Indiana (total and rural).
84 Iowa (total and rural).
85 Kansas (total and rural).
86 Kentucky (total and rural).
87 Louisiana (total and rural).
88 Maine (total and rural).
89 Maryland (total and rural). "
Massachusetts (total).
90 New Hampshire (total).
Rhode Island (total).
91 Michigan (total and rural).
92 Minnesota (total and rural).
93 Mississippi (total and rural).
94 Missouri (total and rural).
95 Montana (total and rural).
96 Nebraska (total and rural).
97 Nevada (total and rural).
98 New Jersey (total and rural).
99 New Mexico (total and rural).
100 New York (total and rural).
101 North Carolina (total and rural).
102 North Dakota (total and rural).
103 Ohio (total and rural).
104 Oklahoma (total and rural).
105 Oregon (total and rural).
106 Pennsylvania (total and rural).
107 South Carolina (total and rural).
108 South Dakota (total and rural).
109 Tennessee (total and rural).
110 Texas (total).
Hi Texas (rural).
112 Utah (total and rural).
113 Vermont (total and rural).
114 Virginia (total and rural).
115 Washington (total and rural).
116 West Virginia (total and rural).
117 Wisconsin (total and rural).
118 Wyoming (total and rural).
119 Hawaii (total).
120 Center of population: January 1, 1920 (map).
121 Center of total, native white, foreign-born, negro, urban,
and rural population (map).
122 Center of population, center of area, and median lines,
1920, and median point, 1880-1920 (map).
Centers of population: 1S80-1920 (maps) —
123 Alabama, Arkansas, and Arizona.
124 California.
125 Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia,
Georgia, and Florida.
1211 Idaho and Illinois.
127 Indiana and Iowa.

{




P late
N o.

128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137

138

T it l e .

Kansas, Maine, Kentucky, Maryland, Louisiana, and
Massachusetts.
Michigan and Minnesota.
Mississippi, Missouri, and Montana.
Nebraska and Nevada.
New Hampshire, New Jersey, and New York.
New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma, and Oregon.
Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Rhode Island, and South
Carolina.
Texas, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Vermont.
Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Centers of population from 1790 to 1920 and centers of
farms, agricultural products, and manufactures from
1850 to 1920 (map).
Geographic centers (map).
1. Population per square mile: 1790-1920.
2 Per cent of increase in total, total white, and negro
population: 1790-1920, and per cent of increase in
native white, 1850-1920.
3. Population per square mile, by states: 1920 and 1910.
4. Per cent urban in total population, by states: 1920
and 1910.
< 1 . Per cent urban in total population, by
states: 1920
(map).
2 Per cent urban in total population, by states: 1910
(map).
ii. Per cent urban in total population, by states: 1900
(map).
2 . Per cent urban in total population, by states: 1890
(map).
Per cent urban in total population, by states : 1890-1920.
1. Urban and rural population: 1880-1920.
2. Increase in urban population, by classes of cities:
1890-1920.
3. Population of cities having, in 1920, 100,000 inhabit­
ants or more: 1920 and 1910.
4. Population in places of 8,000 inhabitants or more at
each census: 1790-1920.
5. Color or race, nativity, and parentage, by divisions:
1920, 1910, and 1900.
1. Per cent of increase in population of territory urban
in 1920, by states: 1910-1920 (map).

.

139

140

141
142

143

144

.

1
I
2.

145
146

Per cent of increase in population of territory urban
in 1910, by states: 1900-1910 (map).
I. Per cent of increase in population of territory rural in
1920, by states: 1910-1920 (map).
'

2. Per cent of increase in population of territory rural in
1910, by states. 1900-1910 (map).
'
Total population of great cities at each census: 1790-1920.
1. Per cent of native white of native parentage in white
population, by states: 1920 (map).
148 2. Per cent of native white of native parentage in white
.
population, by states: 1910(map).
1. Per cent of native white of native parentage in total
population, by states: 1920 (map).
149 |2. States (shaded) showing increase in foreign-born white:
l
1910-1920 (map).
1. Per cent of native white of foreign or mixed parentage
in total population, by states: 1920 (map).
150 2. Per cent of native white of foreign or mixed parentage
.
in total population, by states: 1910 (map).
1. Per cent of foreign-born white in total population, l>v
states: 1920 (map).
„
2. Per cent of foreign-born white in total population, by
.
states: 1910 (map).
147

28

POPULATION.

P late

No.

151

152
153
154
155

156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173

174

175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184

185
186

T itle.

1. Per cent of foreign-born white and native white of
foreign or mixed parentage combined in total pop­
ulation, by states: 1920 (map).
■
2. Per cent of foreign-born white and native white of
foreign or mixed parentage combined in total pop­
.
ulation, by states: 1910 (map).
Total population and distribution by classes: 1850-1920.
Color or race, nativity, and parentage, by states: 1920
and 1910.
1. Foreign-born population, by states: 1920 and 1910.
.2. Negro population, by states: 1920 and 1910.
Color or race, nativity, and parentage, for cities having,
in 1920, 100,000 inhabitants or more: 1920-and 1910.
Per cent of foreign-born white in total population, by
counties: 1920 (maps)—
Massachusetts and Maine.
Vermont and New Hampshire.
Connecticut and Rhode Island.
New York and New Jersey.
Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Illinois and Indiana.
Wisconsin and Michigan.
Iowa and Kansas.
Minnesota and Missouri.
North Dakota and South Dakota.
Nebraska and Colorado.

j

P late

No.

187
188

189
190
191

192

193

Montana and Wyoming.
Nevada and Utah.
Arizona and New Mexico.
Idaho and California.
Washington and Oregon.
1. Per cent of negroes in total population, by states:
1920 (map).
2. Per cent of negroes in total population, by states:
,
1910 (map).
Counties in Southern states having at least 50 per cent of
their population negro: 1860, 1880, 1900, and 1920
(maps).
'1. States (shaded) in which increase iu negro population
was more than 1,000 and was at a higher rate than
increase in total population: 1910-1920 (map).
2. Negro population for 1920 and 1910, in cities having
100,000 inhabitants or more and at least 10,000
negroes in 1920.
3. Cities of 10,000 inhabitants or more in 1920, having 50
per cent or more of their population negro in either
1910 or 1920.
.
.
Per cent of negroes in total population, by counties:
(maps)—
Delaware and District of Columbia.
Maryland and North Carolina.
West Virginia and Virginia.
Georgia and South Carolina.
Louisiana and Florida.
Mississippi and Alabama.
Kentucky and Tennessee.
Arkansas and Oklahoma.
Texas.
Per cent black and mulatto in total population of Porto
R ico, b y municipalities: 1920 (map).
1. Distribution of the Indian population of the United
States, by states: 1920 (map).
•
2. Distribution of the Indian population of the United
States, by states: 1910 (map).
Number and distribution of Indians in Alaska, by lin­
guistic stock: 1920 (map).




194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

T itle .

Per cent of Indians in total population of Alaska, by
judicial districts: 1920 (map).
Per cent of Hawaiians and part-Hawaiians in total popula­
tion of Hawaii, by counties: 1920 (map).
1. Ratio of males to females in total population, by
states: 1920 (map).
•
2. Ratio of males to females in total population, by
.
states: 1910 (map).
Distribution by single years of age for the total popula­
tion, by sex: 1920.
Distribution by age periods and sex for total popu­
lation and for certain principal population classes:
1920Total population.
Total white.
Negro.
Foreign-born white.
Distribution by age periods and sex for certain principal
population classes: 1920—
Native white.
Native white of native parentage.
Native white of foreign parentage.
Native white of mixed parentage.
Marital condition of the population 15 years of age and
over, by sex and age periods, for principal population
classes: 1920.
1. Per cent which population born in each state and
living in other states formed of total born in each
state: 1920 (map).
2. Per cent which population born in each state and
living in other states formed of total born in each
state: 1910 (map).
Per cent which population born in other states formed
of total native population living in each state:
1920 (map).
2 . Per cent which population born in other states formed
of total native population living in each state:
1910 (map).
\
Migration of native population from and to each state:
1920.
Migration of native population from and to each state:
1910.
Net gain or net loss through interstate migration: 1920.
Net gain or net loss through interstate migration: 1910.
Distribution of population born in each state as living
in state of birth or in other states: 1920.
2 . Distribution of population born in each state as living
in state of birth or in other states: 1910.
Cl. Distribution ol total population of each state as born
in state of residence, in other states, or foreign
born: 1920.
2 . Distribution of total population of each state as
bom in state of residence, in other states, or foreign
born: 1910.
Per cent of total population born in state of residence,
born in other states, or foreign born, for cities
having 100,000 inhabitants or more: 1920.
Per cent of total population born in state of residence,
born in other states, or foreign born, for cities
having 100,000 inhabitants or more: 1910.
States having gained or lost through interstate migra­
tion: 1920 (map).
Foreign-born population of the United States, by
country of birth: 1920.
Foreign-born population by principal countries of
birth: 1920 and 1910.

£

POPULATION.
P ate
l

T itle.
No.
202 Distribution of natives of principal foreign countries and
groups of countries, by states: 1920—
Russia.
Poland.
Canada and Newfoundland.
Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.
203 Distribution of natives of principal foreign countries and
groups of countries, by states: 1920—
Italy.
England, Scotland, and Wales.
Germany.
Ireland.
204 Foreign-born population in 1920, distributed as arriving
in the United States before or after 1911.
1. Foreign white stock by principal countries of origin:
1920.
'
205
2. Foreign white stock by principal countries of origin:
.
1910.
"
206 Per cent distribution of the foreign white stock by principal
countries of origin: 1920, 1910, and 1900.
207 Distribution of the foreign white stock originating in
selected countries and groups of countries, by states:
1920 and 1910—
’
Germany.
Italy.
Austria and Hungary.
Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.
208 Distribution of the foreign white stock originating in
selected countries and groups of countries, by states:
1920 and 1910—
Russia.
Ireland.
England, Scotland, and Wales.
Canada and Newfoundland.
1. Foreign white stock, by principal mother tongues:
1920 and 1910.
209 .
2. Elements of foreign white stock, by linguistic groups:
;
1920 and 1910.
2lo Distribution of foreign white stock having specified
mother tongues, for selected states: 1920 and 1910—
English and Celtic.
French.
Norwegian.
Yiddish and Hebrew.
2ll Distribution of foreign white stock having specified mother
tongues, for selected states: 1920 and 1910—
German.
Italian.
Swedish.
Polish.
1. Citizenship of foreign white persons born in specified
countries or groups of countries: 1920.
2. Citizenship of foreign white men 21 years of age and
over born in specified countries or groups of coun­
tries: 1920.
212
3. Citizenship of foreign white women 21 years of age and
over born in specified countries or groups of coun­
tries: 1920.
4. Per cent naturalized in foreign-born white population,
by country of birth: 1920.

723°—24t----- 3




Plate

No.

29
T itle.

1. Per cent attending school in the total population and
213

214

215

216

217

218
219

220

221

222

in certain classes at each year of age from 7 to 20,
inclusive: 1920.
2 . Per cent attending school in the total population and
in certain classes at each year of age from 6 to 20,
inclusive: 1910.
1. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1920. All classes (map).
2. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1910. All classes (map).
1. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1920. Native white of native
parents (map).
<
2. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1910. Native white of native
parents (map).
1. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1920. Foreign-born white (map).
•
2. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1910. Foreign-born white (map).
1. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1920. Negro (map).
•
2. Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1910. Negro (map).
Per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and over,
by states: 1920 and 1910—
1. All classes.
2. Native white— native parentage.
<
3. Foreign-born white.
4. Negro.
Foreign-born white population 10 years of age and over
unable to speak English: 1920 and 1910.
1. Number of dwellings per square mile, by states:
1920 (map).
2. Number of dwellings per square mile, by states: 1910
(map).
1. Number of families per square mile, by states: 1920
(map).
. 2. Number of families per square mile, by states: 1910
(map).
Per cent of homes owned free, owned encumbered, and
rented, in total number of homes, by states: 1920
and 1910.
OCCUPATIONS.

1. Proportion of population 10 years of age and over
engaged in gainful occupations, by states: 1920,
223
1910, and 1900.
2. Per cent distribution of native white persons of native
parentage 10 years of age and over engaged in
gainful occupations: 1920 (map).
224 Proportion that males and females 10 years of age and
over with gainful occupations formed of all males and
females 10 years of age and over: 1920 and 1910.
1. Proportion that males and females 10 years of age and
over engaged in gainful occupations formed of the
225
total population 10 years of age and over occupied,
]
by states: 1920 and 1910.
2. Proportion of children of each sex 10 to 15 years of
[
age engaged in gainful occupations: 1880-1920.

30

POPULATION.

P late
N o.

226

227

228

229

230

231

T itle.

Proportion of children of each sex 10 to 15 years of age
engaged in gainful occupations, by states, arranged by
geographic divisions: 1920 and 1910.
1. Proportion of married and of single, widowed, divorced,
and unknown women among gainfully occupied
women 15 years of age and over: 1890-1920.
2. Proportion o f women 15 years of age and over in each
specified age period and marital class engaged in
gainful occupations: 1920.
3. Proportion of women 15 years of age and over in each
specified marital class engaged in gainful occupations:
<
1890-1920.
4. Proportion of married and of single, widowed, divorced,
and unknown women 15 years of age and over in
each principal class of the population engaged in
gainful occupations: 1920.
5. Proportion of married and of single, widowed, divorced,
and unknown women among women 15 years of age
and over in each general division of gainful occu­
pations: 1920.
Proportion of married women 15 years of age and over
engaged in gainful occupations, by states: 1920 and
1910.
Per cent distribution, by marital condition, of the gain­
fully occupied women 15 years of age and over, by
states: 1920.
1. Proportion of males 10 to 13 years of age engaged in
gainful occupations, by states: 1920 (map).
■
2. Proportion of males 10 to 13 years of age engaged in
gainful occupations, by states: 1910 (map).
1. Proportion of males 14 and 15 years of age engaged in
gainful occupations, by states: 1920 (map).
•
2. Proportion of males 14 and 15 years of age engaged in
gainful occupations, by states: 1910 (map).




P late
N o.

T itle.

1. Proportion of females 10 to 13 years of age engaged in
gainful occupations, by states: 1920 (map).
232
2. Proportion of females 10 to 13 years of age engaged in
.
gainful occupations, by states: 1910 (map).
1. Proportion of females 14 and 15 years of age engaged
in gainful occupations, by states: 1920 (map).
233
2. Proportion of females 14 and 15 years of age engaged
in gainful occupations, by states: 1910 (map).
234 Proportion of males and females 10 years of age and over
engaged in certain gainful occupations: 1920.
235 Proportion of population 10 years of age and over en­
gaged in each general division of gainful occupations,
and
classified as industrial and nonindustrial, by geographic
236
divisions: 1920.
237 Proportion of population 10 years of age and over, in
each state, engaged in each general division of gainful
occupations: 1920.
1. Proportion of males and females 10 years of age and
over engaged in each general division of gainful
occupations: 1920.
2. Proportion which gainful workers of both sexes, in
each specified age group, constituted of all gainful
workers, and the proportion which males and females
of each age group formed of total male and female
238
workers: 1920.
3. Proportion of each principal class of population 10
years of age and over, both sexes, males and females,
engaged in gainful occupations: 1920.
4. Proportion of males and females of each specified age
group engaged in gainful occupations: 1920.

De p a r t m e n t o f C o m m e

UNITED STATES. ORIGINAL AREA AND ACQUISITIONS OF TERRITORY:

bureau of the census

1790-_1_9_20

PLATE

No. 1

J 7 *

A L
mK

4 /
^

s

„

t

L ’ .
A

<A
V

T

,V

.V Mr A
uu

z\

A,

x ;
?

\ ji
K

'

3

^
%
.A***

1
___ _
_
------- ;
V

I s s
. ■

H IR TE ^N
J9 **'
* m**

.

'■*» <
£**

ACQUIRE,

n l?ANP
ri- J;-."
PORTO RICO

VIRGIN
ISLANDS

GUAM




ACQUIRED

ALASKA

JU
Hl
: ouired

f-899
AMERICAN
SAMOA

CANAL ZONE
HAWAII

CEDP-D ff¥-PJVNAMA

*ru>htlu

"\

S vml*
Mile i

\

PLATE No. 2




GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920.

PLATE No. 3
RU R A L POPULATION PE R SQUARE M ILE, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
(Outside o f m unicipalities having 2,500 or more inhabitants.)

(32)



PLATE No. 4
RURAL POPULATION PER SQUARE M ILE, BY COUNTIES: 1910.

(33)



PLATE No. 5

M
-S)

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1910 1920.




PLATE No. 6

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1900-1910.

(35)



PLATE No. 7

I. PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1910-1920.

2. PE R C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D EC REA SE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA T ES: 1900-1910.

(36)




PLATE No. 8

1. PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1890-1900.

2. PE R C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D ECREA SE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1880-1890.




(37)

PLATE No. 9

I. TOTAL POPULATION, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS:
1920 AND 1910.

2. DISTRIBUTION OF THE PER CENT OF INCREASE IN TOTAL POPU­
LATION, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1910-1920 AND 1900-1910.
PER CENT

M IL L IO N S
10

0

IS

MIDDLE ATLANTIC

EAST NORTH CENTRAL

EAST NORTH CENTRAL

MIDDLE ATLANTIC

80U TH ATLANTIC

80UTH ATLANTIC

WEST NORTH CENTRAL

WEST SOUTH CENTRAL

WEST SOUTH CENTRAL

PACIFIC

EAST SOUTH CENTRAL

WEST NORTH CENTRAL

NEW ENGLAND

6

NEW ENGLAND

1920

PACIFIC

MOUNTAIN

P//////AW O
EAST 80U TH CENTRAL

3. INCREASE IN POPULATION, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS:
1910-1920.
HUNORED8 OP THOUSANDS
NEW ENGLAND

IS__________ 20

MIDDLE ATLANTIC
EAST NORTH CENTRAL
WEST NORTH CENTRAL
SOUTH ATLANTIC
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL
WEST 80UTH CENTRAL
MOUNTAIN
PACIFIC

4. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION OF THE UNITED
STATES AND EACH GEOGRAPHIC DIVISION: 1910-1920 AND 1900-1910.
PER CENT

U N IT E D S T A T E S
GEOGRAPHIC DIVISION!
PACIFIC
MOUNTAIN
EAST NORTH CENTRAL
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL
MIOOLE ATLANTIC
SOUTH ATLANTIC
NEW ENGLANO
WEST NORTH CENTRAL
EAST 8 0U T H CENTRAL

(38)




■ ■ ■ ■ 1*10 TO 1930
1900 TO 1910

10

15

20

25




PLATE No. 10

1. GROWTH OF POPULATION IN AREA ENUMERATED IN 1790, WITH GROWTH IN
REMAINDER OF COUNTRY: 1790-1920.

2. COMPARISON OF RATE OF INCREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION WITH RATE OF
CHANGE OF IMMIGRATION: 1850-1920.
I860

1870

1880

1890

1900

1910

PER C E N T

1850

(30)

PLATE No. 11
1. CO U NTIES (SH A D ED ) IN WHICH POPULATION D EC REA SED : 1910-1920.

2. COUNTIES IN WHICH POPULATION D EC REA SED : 1880-1920.

(40)




PLATE No. 12

TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: I920 AND 1910.




2. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES:
1910-1920 AND 1900-1910.
c

PER OENT
T0_____ft5
_____8D
_____II»

4
1

■M M

ARIZONA
MONTANA
CALIFORNIA

M

223

Wy o m in g
IDAHO

BZZZZZZ

DIET OF COLUMBIA

FLORIDA

-

NEW JERKY
CONNECTICUT
OKLAHOMA

I

F

MICHIGAN

—

a

zzz^z

OHIO
UTAH

ZZ3

"

"

N U T VIRGINIA
TEXAS

,-

COLORADO
Lw m w

OREGON

a

NORTH CAROLINA
ILLINOIS
MINNESOTA
MAMACMUSETTI
NEW YORK

"77^

PENNSYLVANIA

,

WISCONSIN
NORTH DAKOTA

2]
:.......... r 23

VIRGINIA
MARYLAND
RHODE ISLAND
ARKANSAS

-------------- ~ : n

SOUTH CAROLINA

I H n i o -IMO

V77Z2S3'soo -ISIO

GEORGIA

* DEC;r e a m

DELAWARE
NEW MEXICO

ta n s
—

SOUTH DAKOTA
NEBRASKA
LOUISIANA
INRIANA
IOWA
TENNESSEE
KENTUCKY

.......... '

!

=

pmmm.

U IM JU IJ

I.

a

MAINE

Bza

MISSOURI

Sa

NEW HAMPSHIRE
MISSISSIPPI

T 3

VERMONT
NSVADA

P P L

Z3

(41)

ll 0____ IS0

IS
O

PLATE No. 13

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF ALABAMA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
(42)



Rural population is defined as that residing outside of incorporated places having 2,500 inhabitants or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

0E C R E A 8 F
[ MM CANT IN AM
M TAO
IN CREASE

mrm LAM THAN 6 MM CENT
6

7
/A

TO

IS

MM CANT

16

TO

26

MM CANT

26

TO

fiO MM CANT

60 MM CAMT AM OVER
O

P L A T E No. 14

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF ARIZONA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural population Is defined as that residing outside of incorporated places having 2,500 inhabitants or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

(43)



RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 15

£




P E R C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D EC R E A SE IN POPULATION OF ARKANSAS, BY COU N TIES: 1910-1920.
R u r a l

p o p u la tio n

TOTAL POPULATION.

is

d e fin e d

a s

th a t

r e s id in g

o u t s id e

o f in c o rp o ra te d

p la c e s

h a v in g

2 ,5 0 0

RURAL POPULATION.

in h a b it a n t s

o r

m o re .

P L A T E No. 16

723°—24t ------ 1
(45)



PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF CALIFORNIA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural population Is defined as that residing outside of Incorporated places having 2,500 Inhabitants or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 17

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF COLORADO, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d pla ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

INCREASE
D EC R EASE

□

[ J J J J J ] LASS THAN $ » f « CENT

ESA CCNT INSERTED
S TO 16 NCR CENT
★

(46)




-

IS TO 25 NCR CERT

YA

6 0 RCA CENT AM OVER
O
26 TO 6 0 PER CENT

N O R U R A L P O P U L A T IO N

PLATE No. 18

PER CENT OF INCREASE IN POPULATION OF CONNECTICUT, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d pla ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(47)

PLATE No. 19

PE R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC REA SE IN POPULATION OF DELAW ARE, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 Inhab itan ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

(48)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 20

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BY DISTRICTS:




1910-1920.

1900-1910.

(49)

PLATE No. 21

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF FLORIDA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.

s

Rural pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th at re s id in g o u t s id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

V/A U
u u




to M H C N
U CT

tt «• C N A OO C
E T M VK

RURAL POPULATION.




PLATE No. 22

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF GEORGIA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l p opulation is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e of In corp orate d p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m o re.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 23

PER C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF IDAHO, B Y CO U NTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural p o pu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .

TOTAL POPULATION.

(52)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No 24.

PE R C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D ECREA SE IN POPULATION OF ILLINO IS, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.




Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

. i J r: -MSR SSA L Li ,J 'r ~ i *
l
A
H

I

*

T

I -4 .0

jllT IA 1/ iFO--J D I j“ ...
llt W O D F O R -*
PEOR

I

LJ

ul

i * v * °L f_ s j
*y j
r

I

—
fl.4

:

V

J

M
ASON

t—

FORD

j

j

_______ j
_______
/

L N • -"eTfJ
00A 1
T
_______

CASS

!

~ 8 V

-

L

v 66 i

j?

I

j

.r .y
,
1

P

iC - “ oA '’ ! 4"/
H IG .«$•

1M
ENARD1 - 8 6

.BROW X “ 4.3 I— r
N
1-10 1 J -----------------j
;
.— i munoniki ^ s SANaAMn
o r g an !
a n gGm oON

(

J !
j

1

lr M

1IJ C - ' o e
"U
^
ADAM S

.,

|

I

|P IA T T j

, — I ____ ___J
4.0
_____ J
f M N I
ACO
!------^
7.3 v«.
D O U G LA S /

A.

j IQI ’
,

j — i — ‘—

9 ,L .,

U^ \
,

SH ELBY
-7 .4

_ J— EO
1D

“ Lo

6 --------------— »
.ttE R /.
C LA R K

1

1C ...\ 1
j
C
ji________ lf-IDoV- ' 0 .o
" : E T i.<°5»:# i I T " !
.T E

^ “ C NO , -3,
UT N

D EC R EASE

(ZD

per cent inscrti

»

mug

r

Y ffc J

INCREASE
L U I THAP 6 H » CERT

Z ' z j 5 TO 16 m

16 TO 2 6 PER CERT
5 0 PE* CENT AND OVER

cert

2 6 TO 6 0 « * CERT

(53)

A
*

PLATE No. 25

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF INDIANA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
(54)



R u ra l p opu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o utsid e of in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

'LA G R A N G E IsT E U O E N
-7 .5

----- t

•

IOEKALB

r-T e A L
L!
y////y~-------- 1
----------J

<

PULASKI j

r—

FULTO N

J“

>00000

ilten
M

l

MI
l

w

$ - .U

[" wells j

)^ GRAr
-0
.1

*

*

P

flA N D O L P r

)N

4

V

- i

$

/

j bo4
T

h 5 K -g

■- ru n

^M -C J
o
L
iV

J -o8HS B '
e

ifilJJL j

i." " 8

fowENj | T
| !j

j

“ 1

franklin

jk % T « . - j- * - .

L j » i ►iiufc^—«— . x f " & & £
"

*

*G«-| JACKSON I

U l

KNOX JO AV IE 88. A t - .

.......

-*•* i+> r

I —1 PIKE , . v w .
i . , ,

1-61 I

■

/-n.a ^

;

^"llA WFo Rl)

^ 0 T lS u it
jV| |T,
*S

PLATE No. 26

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF IOWA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ral p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

DECREASE

□

PC* CCNT IMMATIO

fT T T
TTl

t i l l THAN ft P «» CCNT

16 TO 2 6 *«■ CCNT
6 0 PC* CCMT AMO OVCR

S TO 16 *C* CCMT

Ea

2 6 TO 6 0 PC* CCMT

(55)

PLATE No. 27

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF KANSAS, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o re .

TOTAL POPULATION.

Y ///A

i'A D EC A T U R
v /\ ~96
* *
^TH O M M
! SH ER ID A N
’ 1 - 3 .0
1• . .J

^ H E Y E I N ^ ^ ^ R AW LIN S

T
N O R TO N

'«

T
P H IL L IP S ;

j

-11.6

S M IT H

|

.

-3.6

j

!

,

JE W E L L

—1
0.5

|" " “I1
-'0

I BROWN

• M AR SH ALL | N EM AHA J

_j

|

-*• i

- |.7

C LO U D

T

W

7

!
j

r-i—

________ r w p v ; ---------------- r ~ ‘

------ L ---------------- ___________J
|

a®

\

'

a t c h is o n V

.J A C K S O N i

LEAVENWORTH
W YAN D O T T E

1

------------------i

br—

Ot t a w a

* \
I D O U G LA S * JOH N SON

:-2-9
OSAOE
—6 .5

lil.L L
L IJJ

y/////A%
IF R A N K L IN .

M IA M I

,
! /!
1 r ! /> “ \ L'::
cor
i------ i i — |
-------| ! o r e e n w o o d ! w o o d s ° ' 1; * l l e n
I —4 .9
| — 1 4 .9

__
H AR PE R

■■■■h i !

I

I

i

—

-

w////MX^

W IL S O N ^ N EO SHO r ^ r n J R O

i

I i l l k i ' 11

RURAL POPULATION.

INCREASE
D EC R EASE

□

H R CENT INSERTED

mnn

U l l THAW 6 M » C fNT
5 TO 15 H R Cl XT
★

(56)




15 TO 2 5 RCR CCNT

7SA 2 6 TO 6 0 H R Cl NT

NO C H A N G E IN P O P U L A T IO N

. qourson
I
—3 .4

SO H R Cl NT AND OVtR

W
/////X

P '^ 'O 'H t R O R t E

- " - 9

PLATE No. 28

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF KENTUCKY, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.




R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th a t re sid in g o u tsid e of incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

OD D I-™

INCREASE

6 mb e*«n

[= □

IS to 26 « * c«*T

►

\ y / / Y / \

• TO 16 P*™ < * " T

6 0 M B OCBT AND OVCB
8 6 TO SO M « CCHT

(57)

PLATE No. 29

(58)



P E R C E N T OF IN C R EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF LOUISIANA, BY PA RISH ES: 1910-1920.
R u ral popu lation is d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 Inh ab itan ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

C'
D

RURAL POPULATION.

fT T T IA N
TTI

TN*a S P M C««T

I T II m M"
O

to PM
5 Z 2

t s TO SO PM C«*T

★ n o r u r a l p o p u l a t io n

C««T AMO OVM

PLATE No. 30

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MAINE, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R ural popu lation is d e fin e d a s that r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la c e s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

(59)



RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 31

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF M ARYLAND, BY COUNTIES: I9I0-I920.
R u ra l population I s d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of in co rp o ra te d places having 2,500 Inhabitants or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(6 0 )




PLATE No. 32
per

CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND RHODE
ISLAND, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.

723*—24f------5




(611

PLATE No. 33

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MICHIGAN, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l p opulation la d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of In corp orate d p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

( 82 )



TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

P L A T E No. 34

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MINNESOTA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u r a l p o p u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

3




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 35

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MISSISSIPPI, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u tsid e of in corp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2.5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

(64)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 36

(L >
T)

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MISSOURI, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d as th at r e s id in g o u tsid e of in co rp o rate d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.
1
*»»T »

ATCNIION :

1

-A

HOOAWAV

i

, <

j

|

,

,

|
~ T »*»

,M
KRCCR .

< |

( A'

I ’-SV *
!

MOTLUIO-

____ 1 -•* h------- ,_i -•* i ?VT

i

i “

)

rj|r jjH

I

I

RURAL POPULATION.

r '* Y
n

OROROT !

.

—

/ — T — i~

1

.

- # |T “ — -^».»Vl*J|*TONi
i

Ij

-* .T

:

-

.

V— L , —

? ARIO
I 1 •HCiavH I* M N I

“ *0.#

* ACO"

1 ~ ;v

i

~

—
1
4
1
w
' CARROLL
L .,
mm ... i ^T r- > % , %
: T
v
"* .J.— r
/
-J
•I

M
ONROC

< -IO.R /

L
I MNO
ORf

AUORAIN

„
>

-------------L

CO A
O ,,.

=«•

l—

| ■ ■ M l/

~ 5 U r r
J

} / ;

j

...— A

----------------- i
,
v
^
O

LRVTI |
AABT

KNOX

.

!------ j— .! “w " !--------! ** J
■ ------ ^
j
I
------- I
J
i ' « « ' * ■ ! >«.. i
i
U----- 1-> i■ ■ r
~ 1
i
\
i- — 1
i
v— s — -

H I T 1 4*; !
r -—

«
.Aj

— '

r L - ./

tWiOOU,

! C«iA„A, |,/'(—1

—

h

T

jO mNION

T

r ‘- a * -

1

,

/

\

lAUI.^ ^

— \ -w
—u
i /

/

l

>
:

’c T .4

-A R R tN '• » CN

vows err*

n

) H» I
«r
N

“, r rl

J * r
-■

V4i
/ /r

i< !
?

j*!5n*”r

-

\v J S». s- j--s- r- -L- f ± *
j

i
j

"1

£:o<
V -^

|
,

!

'•??’* P

! CA 1
fOR

------ \

Timr j —
■

•~

*

■srim



r - ' tin

I"

*
1

^ j-s a r

i
1

X
.

I

L
1

r~--^
j

i ""

— JjJ
lilU

■-'A ML R N
1C I
”
y , ,

;

J -~ o «

s

j —
r:

**•

“

\

CAMMN

I

-*•

l

M .
AT

S . — .* 1 —

1

r

V i

•

!

___ I
lr* !

T—

jTIXAR

L
:
IjT T
inn
J — i T JJim l
OULR ,
OO
|
M ill
-T4 A
o on
mo
OA i l ^
ZM
1 l -ILI

l

i
-Ml 'v.-y/ RR*
CR

3—

£*£
T ®

> -

PLATE No. 37

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF MONTANA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e o f in corp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2.5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION

(«6)




PLATE No.' 38

PER C EN T OF IN CREA SE OR D EC REA SE IN POPULATION OF N EBRA SKA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.




R u ra l population Is de fine d a s th a t re s id in g o u tsid e of In corp orate d p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

FURNAS

J H A R L A N JF R A N K LIN ) W EBS TE R j I I is * T I | T H A Y E R |

-a , .

ii^ ig -s,

RURAL POPULATION.

J__________I------------L

N Mm
OA
DECREASE

□

Illllil

i

w

> «

E & ffj '• » o »•

SO H

N * CCMT IM U T IO

t re l» m c

0

5

U

t o

H

n

*

I O i»T AMD o v o

camr

(67)

(8 9 )

PLATE No. 39




PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NEVADA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l p opulation Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 40

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NEW JERSEY, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural p op u lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la c e s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.




RURAL POPULATION.

<«0>




PLATE No. 41

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NEW M EXICO, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ral p o p u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

INCREASE

□

■n «

UM

L t M T M * • H » Cl
I t o I I a n ct*>f

rssi

..........

SB TO SO MM C*MT

SO M CMMT *«0 O
M
VfM

PLATE No. 42

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NEW YORK, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R ural pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(71)

PLATE No. 43

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NORTH CAROLINA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
(72)



R u ra l p opulation is d a fln e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of In co rp o rate d p la ce s h a v in g 2 .5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 44

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF NORTH DAKOTA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

DECREASE

□

**■ ccKT ■■m m t i

dm

kill T + %via ctmi
t* m
I to il m c*■t

I I TO »

H I e«»T

r/A nteM ct«t
m
(73)

PLATE No. 45

(74)



PER C EN T OF IN C R EA SE OR D EC R E A SE IN POPULATION OF OHIO, BY COU N TIES: 1910-1920.
R ural p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

PLATE No. 46

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ral p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In c o r p o r a te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

INCRSASE
ra n D

(75)



□

LICC THAN ft A t* CtTT

PM CCNT INOCMTftO
• TO I ft POT M M

I ft TO 2ft PIH CCNT

YA

28 TO 8 0 P t» CCNT

Hill '•
<
=

OVtN

PLATE No. 47

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF OREGON, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of in corp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

IN C R K A K

□

(76)




lllllll

«*r»

'S

to >» m .

M«T
SO MO MOT t*0 OW
t*

f V

** T so m c*.r
O
m

PLATE No. 48

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u r a l

p o p u la t io n

Is

d e f in e d

a s

th a t

r e s id in g

o u t s id e

o f In c o rp o ra te d

p la c e s

h a v in g

TOTAL POPULATION.

. PHILADELPHIA

INC RE A M
DCCMAM

□

PtM CCNT IH U T ID

j g g & j •* TO 9ft

» T O l» N « C I * T

q id
u

L M .T M .lN * « -T

f/A « TO * 0 a t . CtTT
•

★ no

723*—24t----«




rur al

e t .T

so N

l O l.T AMO O N *

r o r u l a t io r

(77)

2 ,5 0 0

in h a b it a n t s

PLATE No. 49
P E R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R ural p o pu lation i s d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f I n c o r p o r a te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o re .

TOTAL POPULATION.

(78)




PLATE No. 50
PER C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC REA SE IN POPULATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural p o pu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 Inhab itan ts o r m o re .




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(79)

PLATE No. 51

R ural pop u la tio n Is d a fln e d a s th a t r e s id in g outsid e o f Incorporated p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h ab itan ts o r m o r e .

(

08 )

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF TENNESSEE, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

CD

IN C RK ASt

rTTTTTl
vm

I I TO SO N l C«»T

c*m

U
• TO IS

01*1

y/A

6 0 re • cess' »«t> ov»»

PLATE No. 52

PER C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF TE X A S, BY CO U NTIES: 1910-1920.




TOTAL POPULATION.

(81)

PLATE No. 53

P E R C E N T OF IN C R EA SE OR D EC R E A SE IN POPULATION OF T E X A S, BY CO U NTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l p opulation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

RURAL POPULATION.

D C E SE
ERA
CUT i —CH O
TI

□

fTTTTTI

K M TXA* ft r t * CCKT
ft

1
6
2
5
so
★

TO
TO
To

re

2
6
0
$

C*xT
K * CCNT

ecw MO ovt ■
T

n o c h a n o c in

p o p u l a t io n

(82)







PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF UTAH, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R ural pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(83)

PLATE No. 54

PLATE No. 55

P E R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF VERM ONT, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural p o pu lation is d e fin e d a s th at re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

(84)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 56

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF VIRGINIA, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d as th a t re s id in g outsid e of in corp orated p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(85)

PLATE No. 57

PER CENT OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN POPULATION OF WASHINGTON, BY COUNTIES: 1910-1920.
Rural p o pu lation Is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la c e s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(86)




PLATE No. 58




Rural p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(87)

PER C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF W EST VIRGINIA , B Y COU NTIES: 1910-1920.

PLATE No. 59

( 88)




PE R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC R E A SE IN POPULATION OF W ISCONSIN, BY CO U N TIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l p opulation Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 .5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 60

PE R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC REA SE IN POPULATION OF WYOMING, B Y COU NTIES: 1910-1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d a s that re s id in g o u tsid e of Incorporated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

MOMMt
DCCM AK

O N

I n l l M I X

cu n

••

f//j> » «n > «o —

<»"

(80)




PLATE No. 61

ALASKA.
J U D I C I A L D I S T R I C T S - P O P U L A T IO N : I 9 2 0
F I R S T ................ ................. .................. 1 7 , 4 0 2
------------1 0 ,7 5 3
SECO ND
T H I R D ..........- ................- .................... 16,2 3 I
F O U R T H ----------------------------------------- 10,5 13

V :.

jP

'

PLATE No. 62

PER C E N T OF IN CR EA SE OR D EC REA SE IN POPULATION OF HAWAII, BY C O U N TIES: 1910-1920.




(91)




PLATE No. 63

P E R C E N T O F IN C R E A SE OR D EC R E A SE IN POPULATION OF PORTO RICO, BY M U N IC IPA LITIES: 1910-1920.

□

m

U M TMM ft M l CM*
SO M « C U T *NO o w ta
• TO Ift M l MOT

PLATE No. 64

M AINE—TOWNS (SH A D ED ) SHOWING D EC R EA SE: 1910-1920.

~ 2 3 *-2 4 t




(93)

PLATE No. 65

TOWNS (SH A D ED ) SHOWING D EC R E A SE : 1910-1920.
VERMONT.

NEW HAMPSHIRE.

-T T -------- T T

—
i

1

VrtJP )

>

1

r

)-----------

1

u^F^V2.i,r^\

VOefljj

- H """"\
.

\ JH £ / m S m m
m m m , mmm.

Shaded areas show decrease.
* N o population reported.

(94)




PLATE No. 66
IN CR EA SE OR D ECREA SE IN POPULATION OF COUNTIES: 1900-1920.
NEVADA.




IOW
A.

(95)

PLATE No. 67

IN C R EA SE OR D EC R EA SE IN POPULATION OF COUNTIES: 1900-1920.
DELAWARE.

VERMONT.

(96)




MAINE.

PLATE No. 68

POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

/

■ | W L
IH

Jll

'~r^yy\ i H
/\ty \ l—
i f

llu I m
F

p
[llgjlllln m

lx' •
ll:il!'l' 1

2 to 6
• to 18
18 to 85




r

PLATE No. 69

( 86 )

POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, BY COUNTIES: 1910.

PP LT N
OUA IO
P I E 8Q U A K F. M i l l .

f

I

Less than Z

I

I

2 to 6

I

....1 e t o l *
i s to 4a
45 to 20

IMMW. 90 and over







PLATE No. 70

1. POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, BY STATES: 1920.

2. POPULATION PER SQUARE M ILE, BY STA TES: 1910.

root

PLATE No. 71

1. POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, BY STATES: 1900.

2. POPULATION PE R SQUARE M ILE , BY STA TES: 1890.

(100)




PLATE No. 72




DENSITY OF POPULATION OF ALABAMA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

TOTAL POPULATION.

p o p u l a t iIs nd e fin e d
o

a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In c o r p o r a te d p la ce s h a v in g

2 ,5 0 0

I n h a b i t a m ore. o r
n ts

RURAL POPULATION.

( 101)

Rural

(sox)

PLATE No. 73




D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION O F ARIZONA, B Y COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u tsid e of Incorporated p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N U M B E R OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E

I

'I “

» ™ *" »

m in i * « •

W/A •
is

TO IB
to 4«

/ / / /

AS TO SO

mu

eo

and oven

PLATE No. 74

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF ARKANSAS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l p opu lation I s d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of in co rp o ra te d p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

(KOI)

TOTAL POPULATION.




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 75

D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION OF CA LIFO R N IA , BY COU N TIES: 1920.
R u ra l population la d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

£
TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

NUMBER or INHABITANT*
NCR SQUARE MILE

□

LESS THAR

fT T T
TT)

2

TO

C

•

to

|«

522

It

TO

46

«

TO

JO

m i

M

ARO OVER

J

* NO RURAL POPULATION

CONTRA COSTA
SAN FRANCISCO




SAN MATEO-1

SANTA CRUZ

SAN FRANCIS
SAN MATEO

SANTA CRUZ'*"

PLATE No. 76

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF COLORADO, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N UM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E

n
m

’T
7
\

LE M THAN 2

2

to

6 TO 18

e

f /

f j i

I f M B
*

«

to «>

9 0 AN0 OVEN

NO NUNAL POPULATION

(105)

PLATE No. 77

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF CONNECTICUT, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o rs.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(106)




D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF DELAW ARE, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d as th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In corp orated pla ce s h avin g 2,5 0 0 Inh ab itan ts o r m o re .

TOTAL POPULATION.




RURAL POPULATION.

MUMMA Of IMMAIITMITI

n

lzm

llillll

*

Thau

™

2

•

6® « « »
HU «

(107)

PLATE No. 79

( 801)

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF FLORIDA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




Rural p o pu lation Is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u t s id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h ab itan ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

6Z8

Hill

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 80

723°— 24 f ------ 8
(109)



D E N SIT Y O F POPULATION O F GEORGIA, B Y COU NTIES: 1920.
R ural p op u lation is d a fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.
NUMBER Of INHABITANT*
NCR IOOARC MILE

PLATE No. 81

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF IDAHO, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m o re .

TOTAL POPULATION.

(110)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 82

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF ILLINOIS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d as th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

RURAL POPULATION.

TOTAL POPULATION.
IT

W ® y?:ysss\ \ m
I I < 0 ' I McMENRY ! | l A A t

ALEXANDER




NUM BER O F IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E
□

LESS THAN

11 1 1 8T 9
111 °

7

e

to

18

to

i0
40

W

4 6 TO 6 0

00

ano

Over

(111)

PLATE No. 83

D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION OF IN D IA NA, BY COU NTIES: 1920.

( 112)



R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 84

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF IOWA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

NUM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E

□

L E M THAN 2

mnD 2 TO S

6 TO 18

I 1 8 TO 4 C

4 6 TO 0 0

0 0 ANO OVEN

(113)

PLATE No. 85

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF KANSAS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d as th a t re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 Inhab itan ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

LE AV E N W O ATH
W YAN D O TTE

RURAL POPULATION.

N U M BE R OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER 8QUARE M IL E

n

LESS THAN 7

mrm 2 TO 6

(114)




6 TO 1 8

fS £ 5 -i

ia t d * s

^

11 f l l

«T O O O

8 0 ANO O vtlt

PLATE No. 86

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF K EN TU CK Y , BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d pla ce s h avin g 2,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

( 115)

(911)

PLATE No. 87




D EN SITY O F POPULATION OF LOUISIANA, BY PA RISH ES: 1920.
R ural p o pu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,500 Inhabitants o r m o r e .

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N UM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SOUARE M ILE

□

nrnn

L E M THAN

2

8T 1
00

W//A, IB TD«*

2 TO 0

it

MO R U R A L PO PU LA TIO N

VZ/

46

to

00

H U H D »»D O
O
V.S

PLATE No. 88

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF MAINE, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ral pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

(Ill)

TOTAL POPULATION.




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 89

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF MARYLAND, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In habitants o r m o re .

TOTAL POPULATION.

(118)




PLATE No. 90

DENSITY OF TOTAL POPULATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND RHODE ISLAND, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




(119)

PLATE No. 91

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF MICHIGAN, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
( 120)




R u ral p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u t s id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,500 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

PLATE No. 92

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF MINNESOTA, B Y COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ral pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u t s id e o f In co rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

( 121)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 93

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF MISSISSIPPI, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R ural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

NUM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E
□

LESS THAN

l l l l l l l 3T° «

(122)




7

0 TO 1 8

4 5 TO 9 0

1610 41

SO AN 0 0 V t »




(123)

PLATE No. 94

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF M ISSOURI, BY CO U N TIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o r e .

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

T

OfTv

PLATE No. 95

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF MONTANA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of in corp orated p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

m i n i * ™•
(124)




W/M is I® « «

i m

»> » - » ■ > « «

PLATE No. 96

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF NEBRASKA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d a s th a t re sid in g o u tsid e of incorp orated places h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

723°— '2 4 f— —9




(1251

PLATE No. 97

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF NEVADA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
( 126 )



R u r a l population is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u tsid e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 98

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF NEW JERSEY, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is de fine d a s th a t re sid in g o u tsid e of in corporated p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

RURAL POPULATION.

TOTAL POPULATION.




NUM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER SQUARE M IL E

□

rmui

L IS * THAN 7

2

to

0

|

^ © TO

>8

to

18
46-

0

5

H IM

46

TO

90

ano

00
oven

(127)

PLATE No. 99

(

128)



D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF NEW M EXICO, BY CO U N TIES: 1920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th at re s id in g o u ts id e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

mm] 2roe

'» t° «*

u rn * -™

PLATE No. 100

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF NEW YORK, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is de fine d a s that re s id in g outsid e of in corporated places h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(

129)

PLATE No. 101
D E N SIT Y OF POPULATION OF NORTH CAROLINA, B Y COUNTIES: I920.
R u ra l population Is d e fin e d a s th at re sid in g o u tsid e of Incorp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 In h a b ita n ts or m ore.
(13 0 )




TOTAL POPULATION.

MUMM*

Ot iNH A lifM T I

KM MUAJK M U
□

lllilll

L fM THAN

*

"

•

TO

IS

TO 46

•
I*

K22 “ ,o ~

11(1

2

RURAL POPULATION.




PLATE No. 102

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF NORTH DAKOTA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is de fine d a s th a t re s id in g o u tsid e of Incorporated p la ce s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

NUM BER OF IN H A B ITA N TS PER 80UARE M IL E
□

L E M THAN 9

11!!I»t° •
11

B52

45

TO

SO

SO ANO OVEN

(Kti)

PLATE No. 103

(13 2 )




D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF OHIO, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l p opulation is d e fin e d a s th a t re s id in g o u ts id e of in corp orated p lace s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

PLATE No. 104

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u ra l population is d e fin e d as th at re s id in g o u tsid e of in corp orated p lace s h a v in g 2,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or more.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N UM BE R OF IN H A B IT A N T S PER SQUARE M IL E

□

(13 3 )




urn

LESS THAN 2

6 TO 18

V / /

2 TO Q

1 8 TO 4 6

l l l i 9 A00E
0 N v”

4 6 TO 9 0

PLATE No. 105

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF OREGON, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f In corp orated p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(134)




PLATE No. 106

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th at r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

PHILADELPHIA

RURAL POPULATION.

PHILADELPHIA

NUM BER OF IN H A B IT A N T S PER SQUARE M IL E

n

L E M THAN 2

n n
m

2 TO

[

0

|

6 TO 1 8

1 8 TO

it

46

622
1U1

4 6 TO 0 0

,j0 * nd o ver

NO RURAL ROTULATION

(135)

PLATE No. 107

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u r a l

p o p u la t io n

is

d e f in e d

a s

th a t

r e s id in g

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(136)




p la c e s hda v in g 2 ,5 i0n0 c in hr abitan ts
o u ts i e o f
o p o ra t

eo dr

m o re .

PLATE No. 108

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R u r a l




p o p u la t io n

is

d e f in e d

a s

th a t

r e s id in g

o u t s id e

o f in c o r p o r a t e d

p la c e s

h a v in g

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

(137)

2 ,5 0 Q

in h a b it a n t s

o r

m

PLATE No. 109

(

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF T E N N E SSE E , BY COUNTIES: 1920.

138)



R ural pop u la tio n Is d e fin e d a s

th a t

r e s id in g

o u t s id e

o f

In c o r p o r a t e d

p la c e s

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N U M BE R OF IN H A B IT A N T S PER SOUARE M IL E
n

L E M THAN 2

CUED2,00

|

j

a TO I 8

iaR «*
.

4 5 to 9 0

m

»■ *««
»

h a v in g

2 ,5 0 0

In h a b it a n t s

o r

m o re .




PLATE No. 110

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF T EX A S, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
TOTAL POPULATION.

(139)

PLATE No. 111

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF TEXAS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts or m o re .

RURAL POPULATION.

N M A or IN A IT N S
U IC
HB A T
NRS U R M E
C O A C IL
□

LS TA 3
E S HN

m i n i * *• •

5222
u n

(140)




IS

TO

40

45

TO

SO

SO ANO OVEN




D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF UTAH, B Y C O U N TIES: 1920.
R u ral p o p u la tio n is d e fin e d as th a t r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 In habitants o r m ore.

RURAL POPULATION.

723°— 24f ------ 10

TOTAL POPULATION.

NUMBER OF INHABITANTS PER SOUARE MILE
C

(141)

PLATE No. 112

D

LE M THAU

C U ffl.T o »

7

B TO I B

w

A S TO 9 0

MBMto

an° •".*

PLATE No. 113

D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION OF VERM ONT, BY COU NTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s that r e s id in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m o re

TOTAL POPULATION.

(142)




RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 114

DENSITY OF POPULATION OF VIRGINIA, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th at re s id in g o u ts id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

N m er or IB A IT M*
u b
MO A T
PCR MU ARC MIlC

□
r wi

(143)

PLATE No. 115

D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION OF WASHINGTON, BY COU NTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d a s th at residing: o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

NUM BER O r IN H A B ITA N TS PER SOU ARE M IL E
m

i

—

| | | 1 1 | | a TO S

(144)




m

6 to 1 8

^

2

A , TO SO

W M

'« ™ « «

U

H

DO » » D OVM




(145)

PLATE No. 116

D E N SIT Y OF POPULATION OF W EST VIRGINIA , BY COU NTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation Is d e fin e d a s that r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la c e s h a v in g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No.* 117

(146)




DENSITY OF POPULATION OF WISCONSIN, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
R ural p o pu lation is d e fin e d a s th a t r e s id in g o u t s id e o f in c o rp o ra te d p la ce s h avin g 2 ,5 0 0 in h a b ita n ts or m ore.

TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

PLATE No. 118

D EN SITY OF POPULATION OF WYOMING, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
Rural popu lation is d e fin e d as that resid in g o u ts id e o f in co rp o ra te d pla ce s havin g 2,5 0 0 in h abitan ts o r m ore.




TOTAL POPULATION.

RURAL POPULATION.

m rm

2 TO 0

1 8 TO

HUB 00 A O
M

O v tH

(147)




D EN SIT Y OF POPULATION OF HAWAII, BY COU NTIES: 1920.




PLATE No. 120

(149)

PLATE No. 121

(150)



PLATE No. 122

(151)



PLATE No. 123
. C EN T ER S OF POPULATION: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

ALABAMA

ARKANSAS

[ ^ * u

.
LITTLE ROC

ARIZONA

(152)







PLATE No. 124

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

CALIFORNIA

(153)

PLATE No. 125

CENTERS OF POPULATION: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

COLORADO
CONNEOTICUT

DIST. OF COLUMBIA
DELAWARE

FLORIDA

GEORGIA

(154)







PLATE No. 126

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

IDAHO

PLATE No. 127

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

INDIANA

IOWA

(156)




PLATE No. 128

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

MAINE

KANSAS

KENTUCKY
MARYLAND

LOUISIANA
^ .
.%**£&&&*"*>

J iM n U I
UtH J
a

MASSACHUSETTS

j \durA

vI
'V/ E s
y
"^920 I § t L I C I A N A , W r
M ^ y^tet/^U K uy j t

p/.^ u

’

5

7 23°— 24 f -------11




^

(157)

PLATE No. 129

CENTERS OF POPULATION: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920,

MICHIGAN

MINNESOTA

(158)




PLATE No. 130

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

MISSISSIPPI




MISSOURI

MONTANA

(159)

PLATE No. 131

CENTERS OF POPULATION: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

NEBRASKA

NEVADA

(160)







PLATE No. 132

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

NEW HAM PSHIRE

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

(161)

PLATE No. 133

CENTERS OF POPULATION: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

NEW MEXICO

NORTH DAKOTA

OKLAHOMA

(162)




NORTH CAROLINA

OHIO

OREGON

PLATE No. 134

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

PENNSYLVANIA

S O U TH C AR O LIN A
RHODE ISLAND




(1 63;

PLATE No. 135




CENTERS OF POPULATION:

TEXAS

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

TENNESSEE

UTAH
VIRGINIA

PLATE No. 136

CENTERS OF POPULATION:

1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, AND 1920.

WASHINGTON

WISCONSIN

WEST VIRGINIA




WYOMING

(165)

PLATE No. 137
( 166)




PLATE No. 138

(167)



PLATE No. 139
2.
I. POPULATION PER SQUARE M ILE: 1790-1920.

1700

POPULATION pen 3O UA0€ M ice

Id
*

0

3.

20

PER CENT OF INCREASE IN TOTAL, TOTAL W HITE, AND NEGRO
POPULATION: 1790-1920, AND PER CENT OF INCREASE IN NATIVE
W H ITE: 1850-1920.

30

POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1910.
POPULATION PER SOUARE M IL *
200
800
400

I0 O O

1010

ftMOOC ISLAND

R O EIS A D
HD LN
MASSACHUSETTS

NSW JERSEY

NEW YO R K

Co n n e c t ic u t

N EW JER SE Y
C A L IF O R N IA
IL LIN O IS

CNETCT
ONCI U*
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
O H IO
NEW H A M P S H IR t
M IC HIG AN
M ARYLAND
W ASH IN G TO N
D ELAW ARE
IN D IAN A
OREG ON
COLO RAOO
U TAH
W ISCONSIN
M I8 S 0 U R I
M IN N E S O T A

FLO RIDA
IO W A
A R IZ O N A
LO U ISIA N A
KAN8A9
TEXAS
M ONTANA
N EBR ASKA

waS
minoton

VERMONT

T C * a*
W Y O M IN G

PLORlOA
NEBRASKA

VIRG IN IA

NORTH OAKOT*

ID AH O

COLORADO

O K LA H O M A

BOUTH DAKOTA

KENTUCKY

0*100*0

TEN N ESSEE

UTAH

W E 8T VIRG IN IA

IDAHO

GEORGIA

MONTANA
NEW MEXICO

ALABAM A

ARIZONA

N EV ADA

w
yominq

N O R TH C AR O LIN A

NEVADA

NEW M EXICO
6 0 U T H C AR O U N A
AR KA N SAS
SO U T H D A K O T A
N O R TH D A K O T A

MSSI P
I I SPI
S
n«8)




1000

1040

1060

1000

1 0 70

1060

1 6 00

1000

1019

4. PER CENT URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1910.

MASSACHUSCTTI

NEW YORK

1020

40




PLATE No. 140

1. PER CENT URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PER C EN T URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA T ES: 1910.

(169)

PLATE No. 141

1. PER CENT URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1900.

2. P E R C EN T URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1890.

(170)




PLATE No. 142

PER CENT URBAN IN TOTAL POPULATION, Y STATES:
B
NEW ENGLAND

1890-1920.

EAST NORTH CENTRAL

PER CENT

PER

MAINE

OHIO

N. H.

IND.

VT.

ILL.

MASS.

MICH,

RI
. .

CENT

WIS.

CONN.

MINN.

N. Y.

IOWA

N. J.

M
O.

PA.

N. OAK.

DEL.

S, DAK.

M.
O

NEBR.

VA

KANS-

W VA.
.

N0.

TENN.

8. 0 .

ALA.

G
a

MISS.

FLA
MONT.
IDAHO
W
YO.

ARK.
LA.
OKLA.

TEX.

COLO.
WASH

N. MEX
OREG.
ARlZ

OALIF.
UTAH
NEW
.




(171)

PLATE No. 143
1. URBAN AND RURAL POPULATION: 1880-1920.

2. INCREASE IN URBAN POPULATION, BY CLASSES OF CITIES: 1890-1920

M IL L IO N S

TO TAL URBAN

16.000 A N D O V E R

46 ,000 TO 100.000
100.000 TO 2fiO
260.000 TO 600.000

1900 TO |910

V 77 7//7 /7 1 I W I t

h u m

3. POPULATION OF CITIES HAVING, IN 1920, 100,000 INHABITANTS 4. POPULATION IN PLACES OF 8,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE A T EACH
OR M O RE: 1920 A N D 1910.
CENSUS: 1790-1920.

| IN PLACCt WITH a.OOO OH M O R I RO*LA_ATHH
1 OUT Si DC SUCH ELAC U

5. COLOR OR RACE, N ATIV ITY, AND PARENTAGE, BY DIVISIONS: 1920, 1910, AND 1900.
40

IM
0
U N IT E D S T A T E S

mo

1900
G EO G RAPHIC D IV I8IO N S
1920
NEW ENG LAND

PER C E N T
60

60

7.......

M ID . A T L A N T I C

E.NOLCENTRAL
W NO.CENTRAL
8 0 . A T L A N T IC

E. 8 0 . C E N TR A L

V i 5 0 .C E N T R A L

1910
1900
N A T IV E W H IT E . N A T IV E P A R E N TA G E
N A T IV E W H IT E . F O R E IG N OR M IX E D PAR EN TAG E
FO R E IG N -B O R N W H IT E
NEG RO A N D A L L O TH E R

(172)




PLATE No. 144
I. PE R C EN T OF IN CR EA SE IN POPULATION OF TERR ITO RY URBAN IN 1920, BY STA TES: 1910-1920.

2. PER C EN T OF IN CR EA SE IN POPULATION OF TERR ITO RY URBAN IN 1910, BY STA TES: 1900-1910.

7 2 3 ” — 2 4 t ------- 12




(173)

PLATE No. 145
I. PER C EN T OF IN CREA SE IN POPULATION OF TERR ITO RY RURAL IN 1920, BY STA TES: 1910-1920.

2. PER C EN T OF IN CR EA SE IN POPULATION OF TERR ITO RY RURAL IN 1910, BY STA TES: 1900-1910.

(174)




PLATE No. 146
TOTAL POPULATION OF G R EA T C IT IE S AT EACH CENSUS: 1790-1920.
' HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
NEW YORK

JERSEY CITY ROCHESTER PORTLAND DENVER




TOLEDO PROVIDENCE COLUMBUS LOUISVILLE ST. PAUL

OAKLAND

AKRON

ATLANTA

OMAHA

(1 7 5 )

PLATE No. 147

1. PER CENT OF NATIVE WHITE OF NATIVE PARENTAGE IN WHITE POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 73.3 per cent, not shown separately on the map.)

2. P E R C EN T OF NATIVE W HITE OF NATIVE PARENTAGE IN W HITE POPULATION, B Y STA TES: 1910.

(

I Less than 25 per cen t
25 to 37$ percent.
\ / / 37$ to 50 per cent.
//A
50 to 62$ per cent.
62$ to 75 per cent.
PA A 75 to 87$ per cent,
87$ per cent and over.

on

The heavy lines (— ) show geographic divisions.

(176)




PLATE No. 146

1. PER CENT OF NATIVE WHITE OF NATIVE PARENTAGE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 54.7 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. STA T ES (SH A D ED ) SHOWING IN CREA SE IN FOREIGN-BORN W HITE: 1910-1920.




(177)

PLATE No. 149

1. PER-CENT OF NATIVE WHITE OF FOREIGN OR M IXED PARENTAGE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 13.4 per cent, not shown separately on th e m ap.]

H Z Less than 5 per cent.
r r m 5 to 10 per cent.
V ///A 10 to 15 per cent.
15 to 25 per cent.
f z n 25 to 35 per cent.
!■■■■! 35 to 50 per cent.
[ 50 per cent and over.
The h eavy lines (— ) show geographic divisions.

2. PER C EN T OF NATIVE W HITE OF FOREIGN OR M IX E D PARENTAGE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1910.

f
l Less than 1 per
f v V l 1 to 5 per cent.
V ///A 5 to 10 per cent.
Efc&fl 10 to 15 per cent.
I 15 to 25 per cent.
H Z 25 to 35 per cent.
\ 35 to 50 per cent.
B H I 50 per cent and over.
The heavy lines ( ^ ) show geographic divisions.

(178)




PLATE No. 150

1. PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 6.5 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

Less than 1 per cent.
1 to 5 per cent.
5 to 10 per cent.
10 to 15 per cent.
15 to 25 per cent.
KZ2 25 to 35 per cent.
The heavy lines ( — ) show geographic divisions.

2. PER C EN T OF FOREIGN-BORN W HITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1910.




(179)

PLATE No. 151

1. PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE AND NATIVE WHITE OF FOREIGN OR M IXED PARENTAGE COMBINED
TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 19.9 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. PE R C EN T OF FOREIGN-BORN W HITE AND NATIVE W HITE OF FOREIGN OR M IXED PARENTAGE COMBINED
TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1910.

(180)







PLATE No. 152
TOTAL POPULATION AND D ISTRIBUTIO N, BY CLASSES: 1850-1920.

(181)

PLATE No. 153
COLOR OR RACE, NATIVITY, AND PARENTAGE, BY STA TES: 1920 AND 1910.

1920

1910

93 N -J

ZZZUZZ

y

80U TH ATLANTIC

PA.

^//////////////^
• 7/S///.v////// y/
Z// //// //////A/A
i
v// // /y^
// // m.

a zza
y //////
zza a m
« ///////
NATIVE W H ITE -N ATIV E PARENTAGE

(182)




FORE ION-BORN WHITE

NATIVE WHITE-FOREIGN OR MIXEO PARENTAGE ■

negro

AND

all

OTHER

y

//////j

PLATE No. 154
2. NEGRO POPULATION, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1910.

'• FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION, BY STATES: I920 AND 1910.
H U N D R E D S OF TH O U SAN D S




O

M A IN E

z

a
z
U
i

M ASS.
R . I.
CONN.

Q < N. J.
PA.
< O H IO
K
t IN D .
$ 0 IL L .
H IT
H M IC H .

k

o wis.
M IN N .
< IO W A

J

m.
o

S c

N. D AK.

8.

DAK.

K

o

NEBR.
K A N 8.
DEL.
M D.

£

W. VA.

j N. C.
E
O

S. C.
GA.
FLA.

§ 2

TENN.

£5 A 4
Lhj A K
R'
Ok la.
E -Z O K L A .

8

g

TEX.
M ONT.
ID A H O

z

W YO.

£

C O LO .

I

N. M EX.

5

A R IZ .

O

UTAH
NEV.
O

W ASH.

5

OREG.

<
0.

C A L IF .

(1 8 3 )

PLATE No. 155
COLOR OR RACE, NATIVITY, AND PA RENTAGE, FOR C IT IE S HAVING, IN 1920,100,000 INH ABITANTS OR MORE: 1920 AND 191ft

1920
NEW YO RK
MANHATTAN BOROUGH
BRONX BOROUGH
BROOKLYN

BOROUGH

QUEENS BOROUGH
RICHMOND BOROUOH
C H IC A G O
P H IL A D E L P H IA
D E T R O IT
C LE VELAN D

8 . L O U IS
T
B08T0N

B A L T IM O R E
P IT T S B U R G H
L 0 8 AN G E LE 8
BUFFALO
S A N F R A N C IS C O
M IL W A U K E E
W A S H IN G T O N
NEW ARK
C IN C IN N A T I
NEW O R LE AN S
M IN N E A P O L IS
K A N S A S C IT Y , M O .
SEATTLE
IN D IA N A P O L I8
J E R S E Y C IT Y
RO CHESTER
P O R T L A N D . OREG.
DENVER
TO LEDO
P R O V ID E N C E
C O L U M B U 8 . O H IO
L O U I 8 V IL L E
ST. PAUL
O AKLAN D
AKRON
ATLANTA
OM AHA
W ORCESTER
B IR M IN G H A M

8Y R A C U 8 E
R IC H M O N D
NEW HAVEN
M E M P H IS

8N
A

A N T O N IO

D ALLA8
DAYTO N
B R ID G E P O R T
HOUSTON
HARTFORD
SCRANTON
G R A N D R A P ID S
PATERSON
YO UNGSTOW N
S P R IN G F IE L D , M A S S .
D E 8 M O IN E S
NEW BEDFO RD
F A L L R IV E R
TRENTON
N A 8 H V IL L E
S A L T L A K E C IT Y
CAM DEN
N O R FO LK
ALBANY
LO W E LL
W IL M IN G T O N
C A M B R ID G E
R E A D IN G
FO RT W O R TH
SPOKANE
K A N S A S C IT Y . K A N S .
„

NATIVE W H IT E -N A T IV E PARENTAGE

(184)




YONKER8

NATIVE W H ITE -FO R E IG N OR M IX E D PARENTAGE

FOREIGN-BORN W HITE

I NEGRO AND ALL OTHER

PLATE No. 156

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




□

LESS THAN 6

PER CENT

5 T 10 PRCN
O E AT
"| 10 T 16 PRON
O E ET

1TT1
TTT

L S1 it t 2 ««
a'
o5

V//. 26 T 36 PR ET
O E CN
tlllll 35 T 60 PRCN
O E ET
60

P « « CENT AND OVER

(1 8 5 )

PLATE No. 157
PER CEN T OF FOREIGN-BORN W HITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
VERMONT.

NEW HAMPSHIRE.

LE SS THAN 6 PEA CE N T
T ] 5 TO 10 P E R CENT
10

TO 16 PER CEN T

16

TO 26 PER CEN T

25

T O 36 PE R CENT

l l l l l l 36 TO 60 PE R CEN T
’

(186)




'

PER CENT AND OVER

PLATE No. 158

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




(1 8 7 )

PLATE No. 159
(

188)




PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
NEW YORK.

NEW JERSEY.

PLATE No. 160

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

OHIO.
W ILLIAM8 ■

K

~ jll

PAULDING
Diumu

.

!

I

•

I

PUTNAM

----- !1
"

•

I

.
HANCOCK .------------------ --

J WYANDOT '.lllllll I | 1
I 1____j•
I CRAWFORD

I

I

T - = i. P

RCER j

r -

5

j

)

AUGLAIZE ___j -------------------,

jj
---------- M

i
SHELBY

j _

i_ ^ n f
_
1

/
CHAMPAI GN

' w

! MORROW j

|

^

UH,ON

DELAWARE

w
l
*

j

• 1 1 1 Tl T f

1

-

i

PENNSYLVANIA.

\

BRADFORD

ilUllilL
Pi
fy *
ON
/

L Y C O M IN G
1V

1

C L A R IO N

n

f e

p

< S C H U Y L K IL L i

L A N C A 8T E R
BEDFO RD

/

/
/

f
/

}
F R A N K L IN

y___ Z .

□

L S TH A N
ES

ft

P RC EN T
E




ADAM 9

i
Y /V ^/A

CHESTER

!

. P H IL A D E L P H IA

YORK

v_A l

'

10 T o 16 PE R C EN T
u r n

3 5 t o 6 0 PE R C E N T

15 TO 2 5 P E R C E N T
PE R C E N T

5 0 P E R C E N T AND OVER

W

723°—24t----- 13

I

4
!

A

25 TO 3 5 P E R C E N T

(180)

PLATE No. 161
PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN W HITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COU NTIES: 1920.
(

ILLINOIS.

190 )




INDIANA.

OAVIESS

tlf
_ |°e K A L B

F rog*

T rrr
m

, ..... ^

J J _ L IU 1 T

I M ER C ER

r£/ I
1

I

J T j / j f

/ KANKAKEE

-JllT
l

LIV IN G S EON

W

O

” - |

E L I

rL lTfJin■it :l||j]|
■ TP M i ■f l
?il
1
1

—

ITA2
t!/ 1 I T y mAaSsoniiu(| l T
f
M
ON
^rni. I ONj
OA

j

j

m

CHRISTIAN j

' !■ >

'

m
~

/

COLES
SH EL0V

I

-

t ------------- — i

j.eeK,

........

i : . _ S - w 4 .-5
CA - \
Lr
rirrrr

FT lT Tcl,’'to t
I in T i
"
5rjf.“

l [l ^

___ ,------ j/ _ \ {

m
»

i i/ r
i

i
---------

Wfttttir— n
j

^ ranoolpm I

......w

perry

iiniiii
JACKSON || I

s a l in e

I

. . . m i l ... a i
I jJ rTo*'P O P E •A
H"
L ___ . . . . !.
j1
J / !
7 'V: v ' . .
ALEXANDER-V * - j
pope

PLSI
UA K

J

P L A T E No. 162

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: I920.

(101)



60 PE R C E N T AND OVER

PLATE No. 163

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
IOWA.

KANSAS.

10 T o 15 P E R C E N T
□

LESS TH A N

6 PER CENT

P RC E N T
E
3 5 P RC E N T
E

15 TO 2 6
JU

5 T o 10 PER CENT
2 5 TO

(192)




mn

3 6 TO 5 0

P RC E N T
E
A OOE
N VR

5 0 PER CEN T

PLATE No. 164




PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

MINNESOTA

MISSOURI.

PLATE No. 165

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
NORTH DAKOTA.

SOUTH DAKOTA.

10 T O 15 PE R C E N T
□

mini
(194)




LESS T H A N

3 6 TO 5 0 P E R C E N T

6 PE R C E N T
15 T O 25 PER C E N T

5 0 PE R C E N T A ND OVER

6 T O 10 PER C E N T
25 T O 35 PE R C E N T

PLATE No. 156

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




NEBRASKA.

COLORADO.

□

L S T A 6 P RC N
ES HN E E T

IHIIll

5 TO 1 0

[ T -'l

10 TO 15 P E R C EN T
15 TO 2 5 P E R C EN T

C EN T
26

to 3 6

pcp

cent

1(11 3 TO 5 0 PE R C EN T
4
m * P E R C E N T AND OVER
>

(195)

PLATE No. 167

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
MONTANA.

W YOMING. '

10 TO IS PER CENT

m

n

(1 0 6 )




LESS THAN 6

PER CENT

35

T 50
O

PER CEN T

15 TO 2 6 PER CENT
6 TO 10 PER CENT

5 0 P E R C E N T A ND
2 5 TO 3 5 PER CENT

OE
VR

PLATE No. 168

UTAH.

(

NEVADA.

197 )

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

□

L E M THAN 6
5 TO 10

PER CENT

PER CENT

10 TO 16 PeR CENT
16 TO 26

VZA




PER CENT

25 t o 36 PER CENT
36 TO 60 PER CENT
60 PER CENT AND OVER

( 861)

PLATE No. 169




PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
ARIZONA.

NEW MEXICO.

[ ;

lllllll

LESS THAN 6

I

10 TO 16 PER CENT

[^ y i;:;i|

□

15 TO 2 6 PER CENT

PER CENT

fill «

TO 50 PER CENT
PER CENT AN D OVER

5 TO 10 PER CENT
0

2

25 TO 35 PER CENT




P L A T E No. 170

PER C EN T OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
IDAHO.

CALIFORNIA.

PLATE No. 171

PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN WHITE IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
WASHINGTON.

10 TO 15 PER CENT
□

LESS TH A N

6

PER CENT
15 TO 26 PER CENT

U T 6 TO
T ffl ,
(2 0 0 )




10 P E R C E N T

m

3 6 TO 60 PER CENT
5 0 P E R C E N T AND OVER

WA

25 TO 35 PER CENT




PLATE No. 172
I. PER C EN T OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1920.
[District o f Columbia, 25.1 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. PE R C EN T OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1910.

(2 0 1 )

PLATE No. 173
COUNTIES IN SOUTHERN STA TES HAVING AT LEAST 50 PER CENT OF TH EIR POPULATION NEGRO.

(202)



1920

1900

I860

I860

50 T 75 P R C N
O
E ET

75 P R C N A D O E
E E T N VR

PLATE No. 174

I. STATES (SHADED) IN WHICH INCREASE IN NEGRO POPULATION WAS MORE THAN 1,000 AND WAS AT A HIGHER RATE
THAN INCREASE IN TOTAL POPULATION: 1910-1920.

2.

NEGRO POPULATION FOR 1920 AND 1910, IN CITIES HAVING 100,000
INHABITANTS OR MORE AND AT LEAST 10,000 NEGROES IN 1920.

NEW Y O R K

3. CITIES OF 10,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE IN 1920, HAVING 50 PER
CENT OR MORE OF THEIR POPULATION NEGRO
IN EITHER 1910 OR 1920.

GREENVILLE. MJ8S.

P H IL A D E L P H IA

BESSEMER, ALA.

W A S H IN G T O N
C H IC A G O

NEW BERN. N. C.

B A L T IM O R E

WAYCROSS, QA

NEW O R L E A N 8
B IR M IN G H A M

8T. LOUIS
ATLANTA
M E M P H IS
R IC H M O N D
N O R FO LK,
D E T R O IT
L 0 U I8 V IL L E
P IT T S B U R G H
N A 8 H V IL L E
IN D IA N A P O L IS
C LE VELAN D
H O U 8T O N
K A N S A S C IT Y , M O .

MONTGOMERY. ALA.

C IN C IN N A T I
O A LLAS

JACKSONVILLE, FLA.

C O L U M B U 8 , O H IO

ALEXANDRIA. LA.

NEW ARK
B08TO N

MONROE. LA.

FO RT W O R TH

FLORENCE. 8. C.

LO S A N G E L E S
K A N 8A 8 C I T Y , K A N

8.
BATON ROUGE. LA.

S A N A N T O N IO
W IL M IN G T O N

D EL.

11
*0
G K 2 Z Z NEGRO

OM AHA




(203)

PLATE No. 175

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION: 1920.
(204)



DELAWARE.
(B y counties.)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
(B y census districts.)

■

■

7 6 PER CENT AND OVER

PLATE No. 176

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
M ARYLAND.

LESS THAN 12-y PER C E N T

□
f ill!

11

I 2 j TO 26 P E R C EN T

t% % / | 26 TO 3 7

j

PER C E N T

3 7 y T o 6 0 PER C E N T

V/A

6 0 T O 62-J- PER C E N T

NORTH CAROLINA.

723°—24t----- 14




(205)

PLATE No. 177

(( 0o)
J

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

□

WEST VIRGINIA.

LC98 T H A N I 2 y PER C E N T

lllilll

I 2 y T O 2 6 PER C E N T
2 6 T O 37*y PER C E N T
3 7 y T O 6 0 PER C E N T

V/A
WETZEL
PLEASANTS

t MONONGALIA /

s* ---- ^
N

TYLER

^

W°Dy«I CI 0
TH y
E
.
a

J

. /
V
• < WIRT S ''" . Xn* l
V*/'

!

/

J
Y
>*
i LEWIS

n n A « ip ‘ \ V♦ \ . " ^
ROANE X
V ~

j

✓

barbour)

\

/

(U P S H U R !

£ TUCKER
S.

KANAWHA

/ LINCOLN /
^ WAYNE.

-X
^ ES E \
WBT R
V * P
1
N IC H O L A S \
-

CA /
LY

*
j^ R N^
OA T
/i

RANDOLPH

/ HAMPSHIRE J

8 2 ^ T O 7 6 PER C E N T
7 0 PER C E N T A N D OVER

★

NO

N EQ RO

P O P U L A T IO N

VV
*,>

//

j

VIRGINIA.

/* i,^ P E N O L E T O N ,

/
/

•

d

XPO CAHONTAS

%

\

BOONE

U -U

fMINOo)




*

/' r '------ I
/ v/

VJL

\ UNM
_ B L !p T A .^
^ A E L\ /y
C
|

[IH II
I M

> j PRESTON

'---- V'~"—.

f r / f V v !q mr
iu e \
\ (■ <-\ \ . X
\ W

MASON \ '
' >

6 0 T O 6 ? y PER C E N T

QEm
"EBE
NR

1

\ ^ .fA
'^-U L'0H i^
E \
/

WYOMINQ

K/

N O R TH U M B E R LA N D

^ A CS E
L NAT R
T IO O LES EX
/
M
MATHEWS
N O R TH A M P TO N
G lo u c ester
YO RK
E U Z A B E T H C IT Y

PRINCE98 A N N E

P L A T E No. 178

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: I920.
GEORGIA.

SOUTH CAROLINA.

7m m

□
fir m
g m
y/y.
m m
(207)



■

i
★

LESS THAN 12-5" PER CENT
12-y TO 2 6

PER CENT

2 6 TO 3 7 j

PER CENT

3 7 j TO 6 0

PER CENT

6 0 TO 62-L PER CENT
62

ji TO

76

PER CENT

7 6 PER CENT AND OVER
NO N EG R O P O P U L A T IO N

PLATE No. 179

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
(

208 )



P L A T E No. 180

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
ALABAMA.

MISSISSIPPI.

□

LESS THAN 12-L PER CENT

fir
m

1 2 -j t o 2 6 p e n c e n t

Y ft'/ X

TO

pER CENT

3 7 ^ t o 6 0 p e n ce N T

YAi
H ill

6 0 t o 6 2 - j p en c e n t
3 2 ^ T o 7 6 PER CENT
7 6 PER CENT AND OVER

(209)



PLATE No. 181

( 210 )




PER C EN T OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




PLATE No. 182

PER CENT OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
ARKANSAS.

(211)

PLATE No. 183

PE R C EN T OF NEGROES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
TEXAS.

(2 1 2 )







(213)

PLATE No. 184

PER C EN T BLACK AND MULATTO IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY M U N ICIPA LITIES: 1920.

PORTO RICO.

PLATE No. 185
1. DISTRIBU TIO N OF TH E INDIAN POPULATION OF TH E U N ITED STA TES, BY STA TES: 1920.

2. DISTRIBUTIO N OF TH E INDIAN POPULATION OF TH E U N ITED STATES, BY STA TES: 1910.

(214)




PLATE No. 186




NUMBER A N D DISTRIBUTION

(

OP

215)

INDIANS IN ALASKA, BY LIN G U ISTIC STOCK.

INDIANS
B Y LIN G U IS T IC STOCK
19 2 0

STOCK

NUMBER

ESKIMAUAN_____ 13.6 08
] ATHAPASKAN_______4.657
TLINGIT__ _________ 3.895
ALEUT------------------------2.042

lijjjSy! TSIMSHIAN---------------------842
r-

I H A ID A N ,___________ 524

PLATE No. 187

PER C EN T OF INDIANS IN TOTAL POPULATION OF ALASKA, BY JU D IC IA L D IST R IC T S: 1920.

(2 161




PLATE No. 188

PER C EN T OF HAWAIIANS AND PART-HAWAIIANS IN TOTAL POPULATION OF HAWAII, BY COUNTIES: 1920.




(217)

PLATE No. 189
1. RATIO OF MALES TO FEM ALES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA TES: 1920.
[District of Columbia, females in excess, not shown separately on the m ap.]

2. RATIO OF MALES TO FEM ALES IN TOTAL POPULATION, BY STA T ES: 1910.
[District of Columbia, females in excess, not shown separately on the m ap.)

(218)




PLATE No,
D ISTRIBU TIO N BY SIN G LE Y EA RS OF AGE FOR T H E TOTAL POPULATION, BY S E X : 1920.

MALES

FEMALES
100 y e a r

s

!

and

10
0

over

90

80

70

60

I

60 (

40

30

20

1
0

UNDER

io




a

o

4

2

I YEAR

0

2

4

0

8

10

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
(219)

PLATE No. 191

DISTRIBUTION BY AGE PERIODS AND SEX FOR TOTAL POPULATION AND FOR CERTAIN PRINCIPAL
POPULATION CLASSES: 1920.
TOTAL POPULATION.
PER CENT

AQ E PERIOD

TOTAL W HITE
PER CENT

PER OENT

AQE PERIOD

1
“ II
0.' 7 0 - ■ 740 .7
|
___L I
1.0

1J

t. 1

2.1
2; .

2.1

2.3

4 0 - •4 4

S.fi

24

H
f
r

O.1

Id
o

<!>

•2 4

*

</

> r

✓

40

10- •1 4
<

B.

4. i

2 6 - ■29

4 .2

44

M
r

6.0
„

8

10
6

6.6
4

8

8

¥

14

* 1

r

k

UNC>ER 1 TEARS
_____1
_____ _____1
____
*
0
2
8
4
\
PER C ENT
PER CENT

<
i

NEGRO.

t

FOREIGN-BORN W HITE

AGE PERIOD

PER C ENT

PER CENT

AQE PERIOD

PER CENT

__ to ____

0.

N_

■a l a s
_ L i

0.
1.1

60- •6 4

i.8

14

66- 6 9

1.0

2.2

6 0 ' •64

8.1
2 .8

2.2
6 .7

40- •4 4
36- 39

3.2

J

a .7

30' •3 4

8 7

4.

1. 1

4 6 - ■49

3. ■
4 1

26- •2 9

r

20-

24

<b

?> —

8.6
a.o

T

L
r

84
____
3

6

6.4

1

V

16- 19

4.0

6.4

<✓
10- •14

*

18.9

- 4
lo .i

6- •9

4

3

2

PER CENT

(220)




UN I (ER <i YE, tR8
____ ____ 1
____
I
0 1
2

8

4^

AA

16 ■19

A

fi.a

8 8 4 41
FEB OENT

k t

2 0 - •2 4
-

8.0

4

UN I )ER > Y 6 1tRS
I____ 1
_____
11 0
1 1 22

A

0)

6- ■9

PER CENT

J.9

SO- ■34

V

4
3
22
4
PER CENT

2J i

3 6 - •3 9

4.8

4. i

16- •19

*

2.1

44

441
4.3

2 6 - •2 9

4.3

17

•6 4

84

a7

+

4.3

A

1

__ CO
1
__

30-

1.0

4 6 - ■49

1

8^
3.1
|

3 6 - •3 9

a.«

69

6 6 ' •69
60

L

4 6 - •4 9

3.1

65

•74C .7

6 0 ■64

1. 3

6 0 - •5 4

2.6

9
8

■j

1.3

6 6 - -6 9

IA

•
"

.0

66 - -6 9
60- 6 4

1X

0.7 ^

PER CENT

4

PER CENT

6

8

8.8
- J ____
7
PER CENT

PER CENT

8

PLATE No. 192
D ISTRIBU TIO N BY AGE PERIO D S AND S E X FOR CERTAIN PRIN CIPAL POPULATION CLASSES: 1920.
NATIVE W HITE OF NATIVE PARENTAGE.

NATIVE WHITE.
PER C E N T

PER C E N T

PER C E N T

AGE PERIOD

AGE PERIOD

70--74

0 . 8 7 0 + 740.6

\\

J,

69

66

66 - -69 0.8

-L
60 - *64

60 -64

55 - -59

55 -69

60 - -64

50

4 6 - -49

45 49

44

40 -44

36 - *39

35 -39

30 - *34

30--34

40

-

64

-

-

26--29

25--29

h
20 - *24

20 -24

1 -1
6- 9

15-19

-

1
0

10--14

6 .6

I

6.5

L

7

6 -9

5 -!
*

6.2

6 4

3

— i _I i _
_ ___ _
2

PER C E N T

2

3

4

5

5

0

4

AGE PERIOD

3

03

___I
J ___L

2

2

3

4

5

PER C E N T

PER C E N T

PER C E N T

NATIVE W H ITE OF FOREIGN PARENTAGE.
PER C E N T

6
.3

U N D ER 6 YEAR S

U N D ER 6 YEAR8

6

PER C E N T

6

7

'

NATIVE W H ITE OF M IX E D PARENTAGE.
PER C E N T

PER C E N T

PER C E N T

AGE PERIOD
0 .3

m

70 - -74
6 5 - -69

H h
—

6 0 --6 4
l.l
1.7

5 5 - -59

l. t

5 0 - -5 4

1 .7

4 5 --4 9

2.3

.4 4

4 0 -

2 .7

2.3

2.9

3 5 - -3 9

3.4

3.7

3.6
4.1

3 0 --3 4

n . ,

2 5 - -29

4 3

fo

4 .8

.coA .
5.1
4/

2 0 - -2 4
V

15 - -19

B .4

5.9

10 - -1 4

D.O

5 *9
U N D ER

6

723°—241----- 15




PER C E N T

.

fu

5.8

6
.0
I
5
.9

“

e.i
P ER C E N T

5.4

4
3
PER C E N T

6

2

6

YEARS
I

2

3

4

6

P ER C E N T

(221)

0

PLATE No. 193
M ARITAL CONDITION OF TH E POPULATION 15 Y EA RS OF AGE AND OVER, BY S E X AND AGE PERIODS,
FOR PR IN C IPA L POPULATION CLASSES: 1920.

|

A L L C LASSES

2




N A T IV E W H I T E - N A T I V E

3

(2 2 2 )

N A T IV E W H IT E

■ M IX E D

5

F O R E IG N - B O R N

W H IT E

Q

NEGRO

4-

N A T I V E W H I T E “ F O R E IG N P A R E N T A G E

PAREN TAG E

PARENTAG E

W ///////A

S IN G L E

M A R R IE D
W ID O W E D

O R D IV O R C E D

PLATE No. 194
1. PER CEN T WHICH POPULATION BORN IN EACH STA TE AND LIVING IN OTHER STA T ES FORMED OF
TOTAL BORN IN EACH STA T E: 1920.
District of Columbia, 29.2 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. PER C EN T WHICH POPULATION BORN IN EACH STA TE AND LIVING IN OTHER STA TES FORMED OF
TOTAL BORN IN EACH STA TE: 1910.




(223)

PLATE No. 195
1.

P E R C EN T WHICH POPULATION BORN IN OTHER STA TES FORMED OF TOTAL NATIVE POPULATION
LIVING IN EACH STA TE: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 60.4 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2.

PER C EN T WHICH POPULATION BORN IN OTHER STA T ES FORMED OF TOTAL NATIVE POPULATION
LIVING IN EACH ST A T E : 1910.

(224)




PLATE No. 1%

1. MIGRATION OF NATIVE POPULATION FROM AND TO EACH STATE:

1920.

B O R N I N S P E C IF IE D S T A T E ,
L IV IN G IN O T H E R S T A T E S

2. MIGRATION OF NATIVE POPULATION FROM AND TO EACH STATE:

BORN

L I V I N G I N S P E C IF IE D S T A T E ,
_ B O R N IN

1910.

IN

L IV IN G

O T H E R STATES

S P E C IF IE D
IN

O TH ER

STA TE .

L IV IN G

STATES

BO RN

IN
IN

S P E C IF IE D

STATE.

O TH ER STATES

H UNO REDS OF THO USANDS
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
.

14

M A IN E

O

* h.H
.
g Vr.

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

2

4

M A IN E
N E W H A M P S H IR E
VERM ONT

|jj

M ASS.

£ ft. I.
CONN.

M ASSACHUSETTS
R H O D E IS L A N D

/ MlOOLE

C O N N E C T IC U T

| N . Y.
< N . J.

<P.
A

NEW JE R S E Y
P E N N S Y L V A N IA

<
’AST

NEW YO RK

O H IO

2

IN O .

O H IO
IN D IA N A

O IL L .

tu M IC H ,
x
H
c
9 W IS .

IL L IN O I S
M IC H IG A N
W IS C O N S IN

M IN N .
M IN N E S O T A
J

IO W A

I_ £ m O.

IO W A
M IS S O U R I

S o N . OAK.

it
H

tc

8.

OAK.

§ nebr.
KANS.

NORTH O AKO TA
SO UTH DAKO TA
NEBRASKA
KANSAS

O E L.
MO.

O
C o. c.

z

DELAW ARE
M ARYLAND
D IS T . O F C O L U M B IA

3

VA.

<

W . VA.

*

3 N. C.
2 s c.
<
0

V IR G IN IA
W E S T V I R G IN IA
N O R T H C A R O L IN A

CA.

S O U T H C A R O L IN A

FLA .

G E O R G IA

K j KY.

3< T E N N .
OflC
< 10
fcS

ala.

tu

M IS S

L

. ARK.

F L O R ID A
KENTUCKY
TENNESSEE
ALABAM A
M IS S IS S IP P I

o i la .

ARKANSAS

fe S O K L A

L O U I S IA N A

*

O KLAH O M A

TEX.
MONT.

TEXAS

ID A H O

M ONTANA
ID A H O

Z

W YO.

2

z

C O LO .

W Y O M IN G

g

N

C O LO RA D O

S

MEX.

A R IZ .

N E W M E X IC O

UTAH

A R IZ O N A

NEV.

UTAH

o

w ash.

to.
O

NEVADA

OREO.

W A S H IN G T O N

4

C A L IF .

OREGON




CALIFORNIA

(225)

6

8

10

I?

PLATE No. 197

1.

NET GAIN OR NET LOSS THROUGH INTERSTATE MIGRATION:
1920.
NET
750

G A IN
500

NET
250

THOUSANDS
0

2.

NET GAIN OR NET LOSS THROUGH INTERSTATE MIGRATION
1910.
NET

LO S S

G A IN

NET

LO S8

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
250

500

10

M A IN E
N. H.

Z

w

6

6

4

3

2

1

O

1 2

m x

3 ___ 4

M ASS,

R . I.

7

VT.

MASS.

O
Z
u

8

N. H .

VT.

0

R . I.

CONN.
N. Y.

w r f N. Y .

N. J.

.1

12 P A .
: o h io

< O H IO

K

I IN O .

£

) IL L .

IN O .

S o IL L .
UX
J
h- M IC H .

: M IC H ,

K

9 w is .

j W IS .
M IN N .

M IN N

[ IO W A

< IO W A

; m o .
) N. DAK.

J «o .
S o N. DAK.

■

J k S . DAK.

S. D A K .

o
c
O

> NEBR.

NEBR.

KANS.

KANS.

DEL.

DEL.

MD.
P
Z
<

D. C.

VA.
W . VA.

<

-W . V A .

N. C.

j N. C.
E
CO

GA.
FLA .

FLA .
* _ ,K Y .

3< T E N N .
OCE

O tt TE N N .
C H
D
J -5 ALA.

COH

2o
5

M IS S .

3<

O ff LA .
co>l - z O K LA.

£5 Tklap
(_
v
^

zaa

H ?. ALA.

M IS S .

H_i ARK3<
OCE L A .
i«IU
JO

22
ZZS
EZZ2
Z22

S. c.
GA.

. KY.

s

2S
2

VA.

3
O

3 . C.

®o

zza

M D.

O

O. C.

Q11
O1
ujO

>

TEX.

M ONT.

__v
TEX.
MONT.
ID A H O

ID A H O

W YO.
C O LO .
N

MEX.

MEX

A R IZ .
UTAH

UTAH

NEV.

NEV.
g
5

g

W ASH.
OREG.

W ASH.

5

<

(2 2 6 )




OREG.

a

< C A L IF .

C A L IF .

E li

6

»

J

PLATE No. 198

'■ DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BORN IN EACH STATE AS LIVING IN
STATE OF BIRTH OR IN OTHER STATES: 1920.

2. DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BORN IN EACH STATE AS LIVING IN STATE OF
BIRTH OR IN OTHER STATES: 1910.
PE R C E N T

PER C EN T
0

10

20




30

40

60

60

70

80

90

IOO

NEW E NG LAND
MAINE
NEW H AM PSHIRE
VERM ON T
M ASSACHUSETTS
RHOOE ISLAND
C O N N E C T IC U T

M ID D L E

'//////yY V / VAYAYYAVYAYAYAl
\AAAAAA^AAAAAA\
}
A/Ayy/ w /A/AA
waaaaX

o

10

20

*0

ao

bo

A T L A N T IC
/AAAAAYXVYAAYA

NEW Y O R K

AAAAAAa(A/A/A/.

NEW JE R SE Y

Ao

to

Y777/ 7
7777
7
7' 7 7 7 7 7 .
. 77777
7

im

a

V / // / // / // / // / Z

1

Y M W aw m m w m m A
m
\/////A y/////X

to

bo

■vwA-

•?....... _____

7777 a
7777

y//////A (/Jm .

r s s / s s s j

777 a
777

V/////S

PE N N SYL VA N IA

V /////V /////A W2&AAAAAAY.
/////////
y
W /ArW -AAAAAAy i / / / / / / / / / i
Y ? ?
AAAAAA^AAAAAAy Y/M, AAAAAAy
f//Y //////7 .

E AS T NO RTH C E N TR A L
OH IO
INDIANA

jl

AAAAyAfAAAAAA

IL U N O I8
MICHIGAN
W ISCON SIN

W EST NORTH C E N TR A L
M IN N E SO TA
IOWA
M I8SOURI
NORTH DAK O TA

8OU TH DAKOTA
NEBRASKA
KANSA8

S O U T H A T L A N T IC
DELAW ARE
M A R YL A N D

____ y / / / / / /

YAYA
YAA

777777777/
y//--y/'\m z .............: p
Y /// \
/
YAY^AAAAAA/
\y/// y/\
7777777a
'AAAAAA)AAAAAAA\AAAAAA\\aAAAa YAAAAAy R S
rssz> 7 7777777.
V//y/ yy\ \<AA//A\____ m k :
.......iy /////y
\
\ \,-A/A'A Y'
_
7
---- 1___ i' Y / 7 ///7/ / / ////J/
SKSH / / / / /
/ y///^ ///// y m b \ \ V ////A
\yY'/7 /1 /7 /7 7 7 /7 7 7 7 7 7 1
AAAA/y
'7 777

’’ ’’AAAAAA/AA.

a

a

aaaaa

aaaaa

■ A A A VAA , W /A -, WAAA
AAAy
AAA
AA

AAA/
A A Al

A
A A Y yA Y Y Y
V/////Y V yAAA y/Y/Y/y'Y A / Y Y Y A /YAAAWs

D I8T . O P C O LU M B IA

T

/////////

77777m
7 ////Z
VAAAAAy
A/'A/AA a * m
a
i 777777.
'AAAa
AAA
V//AA
' /y
7 7 7 7 7 /.
'A A A y
AAA
777777/
'AA/A/At
AAA
A // /. 7 / A A Y/y/y. 'M Y . A'AA A V A A A
AA / A A A ..... J 1777a
EAST SOUTH C E N TR A L
AAAAAA X 7 7 7 7 /JY /7 a
AAAAAAy
WWr TW7< ww<
'A A A A y/y/ WM, v /m ^1 7 7 7 7 7 7/ 7 7
AAY
'A A A
AAA
V
yy,
7
wyyy yyyyyy 'A m WW, w m WW ..... 7 7 7 7 . 777
way
wyyy W A AAAAAY ■ -AA AA . yyyyy A Y 1X 7 7/7777
W EST SOUTH C E N TR A L
AAA
y y y y / m m . A A A yyyyyyyyyyy/y/vyyyyyy,
V 77777777.
A
yyyyyyjyyyyyyy W ///t vyyy/yty///yyA/y/y//. A A A I .......I..... T 7777.
AyAAAAy.
777/
777
m y M m W /Y ,
----- f ------- '//////.____ I _ 177771
yyyyy/ M m . • v m .
_
M O U N T A IN
,///yA V/A/YA A Y/A/Y
/
y
'/////Y;

VIRGINIA

W E S T VIRGINIA

V/

NORTH C A R O U N A

SO U T H C A RO LIN A
GEORGIA

FLORIDA

y a

KENTUCKY

TE N N ESSE E

y a m

y

ALABAM A

M ISSISSIPPI
A R K A N SA S

y

a

y

LOUISIANA

y y y

OKLAHOM A
TEXA8

M ONTANA
IOAHO
W Y O M IN G
COLO RADO
NEW M EX IC O
A R IZ O N A
UTAH
NEVADA

P A C IF IC
W A SH IN G T O N
O R E GON
C A U F O R N IA

V 77a
W 7Y
w w , ■ y y .wyy.\ 7 / 7 7 7 7 / 7 / 7 .
y y yy
’ yyyyfyyyyyy. 'M Y ftyyyy my//. f / 7 .'///////.* 7 7 7 .
Y
w/vXyyym w/yy w yy, yyyyyywyyy .7 7 7 7 7 7 7 .7 7 7 /
7Z7//Ayyyyy yyyyyy. ’ yyyyy AAA A y v m .____YX7A ’7 7 7 a
AA
7 A A A ■yyyyyytyy/m w yyy wyyy wyyy Yyyyyy
/AA/
\ f7 7 7 7 7 7 a
Y
w m y/yy/Ywyyy/, yyyyyy,yyyyyy.yyyyyy.yyyyyyyAAAAY. SffA7 7 7 7 .
’
m i m iw m 'W Y wyyy ■ y x 7 7 '7 7 7 a 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

yy/yy/Yyyy//W /yy.

y / / // / / .
///y / / /

yy y
yy y

VT// a7 7 7 .
7 7 7 7 7 a1£77
wvtow*. ........ ! ....... 7777
’

w yy/ w yyy/ .
'w m y y y y y w / w / y/ yy. ’ ■
w y y J w v x . >/WM
T w /Y y/ ym
yyyyW yyyyyy, 'M W
'v m .

wy,
yy

' ’ ' j BOWK AND LIVING IN THE 8T A T E ^ ^ Q b ORN IN THE 8 T A TE ANO LIVINQ IN OTHER S TATE 9

(2271

PLATE No. 199

I. DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL POPULATION OF EACH STATE AS BORN IN 2. DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL POPULATION OF EACH STATE AS BORN IN STATE OF
STATE OF RESIDENCE, IN OTHER STATES, OR FOREIGN BORN: I920.
RESIDENCE, IN OTHER STATES, OR FOREIGN BORN: 1910.
NEW EN G LA N D

.... rm aszn
<w//y/i
/ / / / / / . ] ( . . ---- 'i-yy
— r , : . i . a s w i 7 gjWWi

MAINE
NEW H AM PSHIRE

-----f---- i-----

VERM ONT
M ASSACHUSETTS
RHODE ISLAND
C O N N E C T IC U T

M ID D L E A T L A N T IC
NEW YO R K

- E22S

NEW JE R SE Y
PE N N SYL VA N IA

EAST NORTH C E N TR A L

Y /7?.V /V

INOIANA

// //////A

ILLINOIS
MICHIGAN

a c //}

^ / /// A

'.

y/

WISCON SIN

W EST NORTH C EN TR AL
M IN N E S O TA
IOWA
M ISSOURI
NOR TH D A K O T A
80 U T H DAKOTA
N E B R ASK A
K AN SAS

S O U T H A T L A N T IC
DELAW ARE
M A R YL A N D
O IST . OF C O LU M B IA
VIRGINIA
W E S T VIRGINIA
N O R T H CA RO LIN A
SO U T H C A RO LIN A
GEORGIA
FLORIDA

EAST SO U TH C E N TR A L
KENTUCKY
TENN ESSEE
A LA B AM A
M ISSISSIPPI

W EST SOUTH C E N TR A L
ARKANSAS

zm sa za zn

------------ T
----------- ----------- 7
-----------

OHIO

-a//;

2356

m m m assza n
j. 7 Ai
/ A‘77A.’/ / } ZEm ^JSsn / / /
A.
—
L i -------- a s s /a n
//,

^ ---------

a

—
L—

= E sp r n s z z a z a z a
y' VJ aT
'
.......u---—
2 Z 6
--_
i
2Z Z 6
4 2 — —■ u-m-J 5« a n
/
:W Ja n
W
— Z////i^//jZAA___ m
----SETSTSA
■ A
rrW Ay/'Zaaa. '//& /////* ■■/
^m m a/.
T-- V7
A//ft— -7 '7 T.'~Z'/////A y/..
1m sm a/
- Z--. ' •■r
IY' ' —
i— zzzzE m zzm z
—iLLV/i
T7 ,'VAAAAA*7/'V.1:-7 ZV AAAAA/ 7
,
..... :
=Z3
-ZZZW ZZ^m . ... M i *
.— r r
'M
<
—
===4 =
2= ■ ITES
7 /Za /Z .- =
/7 W Z
ms
* 1
y/////y////
Zv//Z/////yAv^
4 3
-AAT A A A - W/ty/yy///
y y WA A !'
a
zm ±v , ^T”
__ Lit a i
___ L _

7AA/ AA
AAA A,
A
A7 //,
///\

/////yyy
i..... .....—----- ------ £
----- < E3S5B
_

LOUISIANA

23
25

OKLAHOM A

L, : , . v: t e P^

TE X A S
m o u n t a in

M ONTANA
IDAHO
W Y O M IN G
C O LO R A D O
NEW M EX IC O
AR IZON A
UTAH
NEVADA
p a c if ic
W A SH IN G T O N
O R E GON
CA LIFOR NIA

] B O R N IN

8T A T E

O F R E S ID E N C E

fiy g g & f l B O R N I N O T H E R

F O R E IG N B O R N

1228)




STATES

y /.-y-y A^A
! ---- ;--- rrv/y X/AAA.
zzzza za z
y -x +m;mi m o o t
y i.-K
w&z.L L ;ga za zn
—
3
M
:2 ..U
22L222 a s s ///
w m--- -7----- fe22ES22S
m rnm
-----; ‘ ■■-f<( £
...tvi"-S2 3S__ 5 :::u.vn
3
3
—■ ■c <
w SW
Z I" ///////A
my.wMZiSZ wt.'B m S
yV/AAA /ZW
- A AAW
y
.y-\ i.m m a n ra n
y
~
' rzrxzmymt
<
•ai, / / / / / / / / /
r 1f

4 3
. . .! . . .

—
...
1

2" , 3

2

2

2

3

3

^

X /S S S ^S S /S a
^
2

-

Kdjf/, 1 »Q*W IH «TATt o r N|«lO«MCI

* ° " N "• OTMfM (T A T I I

222 >0*IKM BOA"

7

^

PLATE No. 200
1. PER CENT OF TOTAL POPULATION BORN IN STATE OF RESIDENCE, 2. PER CENT OF TOTAL POPULATION BORN IN STATE OF RESIDENCE,
BORN IN OTHER STATES, OR FOREIGN BORN, FOR CITIES HAVING BORN IN OTHER STATES, OR FOREIGN BORN, FOR CITIES HAVING
100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920.
100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1910.
PER C EN T
O

10

20

30

40

SO

PER C EN T
60

70

80

00

100

R e a d in g

R IC H M O N D

N A 8 H V IL L E

N A S H V IL L E

Ric h m o n d

NEW O R LE AN S

n ew

O R LE AN S

ATLANTA

ALBANY

ALBANY

L O U I8 V IL L E

L O U IS V IL L E

ATLANTA

C O L U M B U S , O H IO

8C R A N T O N

B A L T IM O R E

SYRACUSE

DAYTON

C O L U M B U S , O H IO

SYRACUSE

Ba l t im o r e

SCRANTON

B ir m in g h a m

ROCHESTER

° a yto n

C IN C IN N A T I

Ro c h e s t e r

B I R M IN G H A M

Pit t s b u r g h

BUFFALO

b u f f a lo

I N D IA N A P O L IS

C in c in n a t i

P H I L A D E L P H IA

M il w a u k e e

P IT T S B U R G H

g r a n d

TO LEDO

r a p id s

IN D I A N A P O L I S

M IL W A U K E E

Ph il a d e l p h ia

G R A N D R A P ID S

t o n k e r s

S T . L O U IS

HOUSTON

W ORCESTER
C A M B R ID G E

To le d o
s t

NEW HAVEN

. L O U IS

D ALLAS

C LE VELAN D

PORT W O RTH

NEW ARK

0 E 8 M O IN E S

D E T R O IT

TRENTON

PATERSON

p a ll

BO STON

r iv e r

W ORCESTER
S A N A N T O N IO

NEW YORK

No r f o lk

ST. PAUL

F A L L R IV E R
J E R S E Y C IT Y

Ca m b r id g e
b a l t

l a k e

LO W E LL

c it y

P R O V ID E N C E

b o s t o n
n e w

M E M P H IS

h a v e n

Pa t e r s o n

B R ID G E P O R T

Co w e l l

C H IC A G O

n e w

Q A N F R A N C IS C O

YORK

M IN N E A P O L IS

Ne w a r k
b t . Pa u l

K A N S A S C IT Y , M O .
O AKLAN D

W il m in g t o n , d e l .
p r o v id e n c e

W A S H IN G T O N

je r s e y

OMAHA

c it y

DENVER

Cl e v e l a n d

P O R T LA N D , OREG.

C h ic a g o

8 P R IN G F IE L D ,

LO S AN G E LE S

M ASS.

8PO KANE
8EA TTLE

Ha r t f o r d
NEW BE D FO R D

M in n e a p o l is

V ////////A *O RU

IN S T A T E O F R E S ID E N C E

B 8SB 5B53b o r n

Ca m d e n

in

T T T T W lF O R E IG N

Yo u n g s t o w n

o t h e r

s t a t e s

BORN

B r id g e p o r t
M e m p h is
k a n s a s

c it y

, m o .

3. STATES HAVING GAINED OR LOST THROUGH INTERSTATE
M IGRATION: 1920.

o e t r o it
b a n

F R A N C IS C O

O A KLA N D
AKRO N

[District of Columbia, with net gain, not shown separately on the map.J

OMAHA
Ka n s a s c it y , k a n s .
W a s h in g t o n
Po r t l a n d , o r e g .
De n v e r
Sp o k a n e
Se a t t l e
L 0 8 AN G E LE S




^ / / / / / / / / / I B O R N IN S T A T E O F R E S ID E N C E
feaaggftfeaa b o r n i n o t h e r s t a t e s
C Z Z & 2 2 F O R E IG N B O R N

The heavy lin»s ( —) show geographic divisions.

(229)

PLATE No. 201
1. FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION OF TH E U NITED STA T ES, BY COUNTRY OF BIR T H : 1920.
THO USANDS
200

40 0

BOO

800

10
.00

1,200

1 .4 0 0

I .GOO

GERMANY
IT A L Y
R U 8 S IA
POLAND
CANADA
IR E L A N D
EN G LA N D
SW E D E N
A U S T R IA
M E X IC O
HUNGARY
NORW AY
C Z E C H O S L O V A K IA
SC O TLA N D
DENMARK
G REECE
V uG O SLAVI A
FRANCE
F IN L A N D
L IT H U A N IA
NETHERLANDS
S W IT Z E R L A N D
R U M A N IA
JA P A N
P OR TUG AL
W ALES
W E S T IN D IE S
B E L G IU M
S Y R IA
S P A IN
A T L A N T IC IS L A N D S
C H IN A
A R M E N IA
S O U T H A M E R IC A

2. FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION BY PRIN CIPAL COUNTRIES OF BIRTH:
1920 AND 1910.

CUBA

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS

N E W FO U N D LAN D
LUXEM BURG
T U R K E Y IN A SIA
A U S T R A L IA
B U L G A R IA

R U S S IA . L I T H U A N I A ,

A F R IC A

A N D F IN L A N D

A L B A N IA
B O R N A T SEA

IT A L Y

T U R K E Y IN EURO PE
C E N T R A L A M E R IC A
A U S T R IA , H U N G A R Y ,

IN D IA

ETC.★
P A C IF IC IS L A N D S
P A L E S T IN E

NO RW AY , SW EDEN ,
AND DENM ARK

PO LAND

E N G LAN D , S C O TLA N D ,
AND W ALES

CANADA

AND

NE W FO U N D LA N D

★

( 230)




Includes, for 1920, Czechoslovakia and Jugoslavia, and, for 1910, Serbia and M ontenegro.

PLATE No. 202

DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVES OF PRINCIPAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND GROUPS OF COUNTRIES, BY STATES: 1920.
R U S S IA
.
0

100

TH O USAN DS
200

300

400

600

NEW YORK
PENNSYLVANIA
ILLINOIS
Ma s s a c h u s e t t s
NEW JERSEY

PO LA N D
TH O USAN DS
tf'

M ic h ig a n

100

200

NEW YORK

OHIO

PENNSYLVANIA

C O N N E C TIC U T

ILLIN O IS

n o r th o a k o ta

M IC H IG A N

CALIFOR NIA

NEW JER 8EY

Ma r y l a n d

MASSACHUSETTS

W i s c o n s in

OHIO

MISSOURI

W I8CON8IN

COLORADO

C O N N E C T IC U T

M in n e s o t a

M IN N ES O TA

NEBRASKA

IN D IA N A

KANSAS

M A R Y LA N D

SOUTH D AKO TA

RH O D E ISLAND

W ASHINGTON

MISSOURI

RHODE ISLAND

C A L IFO R N IA

IN OIAN A

W ES T V IR G IN IA

IOWA

TE X A S

TEX A S
OREGON
V ir g in ia
M ON TANA
D I8 T. OF COLUM BIA
OKLAHOM A

NORW AY, SW EDEN ,
AND DENM ARK
C A N A D A A N D N EW FO U N D LA N D
TH O USAN DS
100

200

M in n e s o t a

Ma s s a c h u s e t ts

TH O USAN DS

100

IL LIN O IS

M ICH IG AN

0

NEW YORK

new york

W ISCONSIN

Ma in e

W A S H IN G TO N

Ca l if o r n ia

C A L IF O R N IA

NEW H AM PSH IR E

IOWA

Wa s h i n g t o n
Il l i n o i s

N O R TH D AK O TA

Rh o d e i s l a n d
M in n e s o t a
C O N N E C TIC U T
Ve r m o n t
Oh i o
W is c o n s in
N o r t h D A K O TA
^^N N S Y LV A N IA

M A S S A C H U S E TTS
M IC H IG A N
NEBRASKA
S O U TH D A K O T A
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
C O N N E C T IC U T
N E W JE R S E Y
O R EGO N

Mo n t a n a

M O N TA N A

O egon
r

U TAH

n e w je r s e y

CO LO R AD O

io w a

K AN 8A8

COLORADO

O H IO

M is s o u r i

ID A H O

Ne b r a s k a

TEX A 8

Ka n s a s

R H O D E IS LA N D

IN D IA N A

MISSOURI

"OAHO

IN D IA N A




(231)

200

PLATE No. 203

DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVES OF PRINCIPAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND GROUPS OF COUNTRIES,
BY STATES: 1920.
En g l a n d , Sc o t l a n d ,
A N D W ALES

ITALY
THOUSANDS

TH O USAN DS

10
0

NEW YORK
NEW YO R K

P E N N S Y L V A N IA

P ENN SYLVAN IA

N E W JE R S E Y

—

MASSACHUSETTS

M A S S A C H U S E TTS

C A LIFO R N IA

IL L IN O IS

—

IL L IN O IS

C A L IFO R N IA

N E W JER S EY

C O N N E C T IC U T

OHIO

O H IO

M IC H IG A N

R H O O E IS LA N D

RHOOE ISLAND

M IC H IG A N

C O N N E C T IC U T

mm
mm

L O U IS IA N A

W ASHINGTON

M ISSOUR I

IOWA

m

W E S T V IR G IN IA

U TA H

■

CO LO R A D O

M IN N ES O TA

W ISCO N SIN

WISCONSIN

W A S H IN G T O N

COLORADO

M AR YLAND

MI8SOURI

TEXAS

IN D IA N A
M O N TA N A

M IN N E S O TA

OREGON

IN D IA N A

KANSAS
TEXAS
NEBRASKA
M A IN E
M A R Y LA N D
ID AH O
NEW H AM PSH IR E
FLO R IDA
V IR G IN IA

GERM ANY

W E S T V IR G IN IA

NEW YOR K
ILLIN O IS

IR E L A N O

WISCONSIN
PENNSYLVANIA
OHIO

NEW YORK

N E W JER 8EY

MASSACHUSETTS

M IC H IG A N

PENN SYLVAN IA

M IN N ES O TA

ILLIN O IS

IOW Af

NEW JE R 8 E Y

CALIFOR NIA

0

C O N N E C T IC U T

MISSOURI

CALIFO R N IA

NEBRASKA

OHIO

IN D IAN A

RH O D E ISLAND

TE X A S

M IC H IG A N

KANSAS
C O N N E C T IC U T

MISSOURI
IOWA

W ASH IN GTON

M IN N ES O TA

M ASSACHUSETTS

W AS H IN G TO N

|

Ma r y la n d

N E W H AM PSH IR E

|

SOUTH D A K O TA

W ISCONSIN

|

OREGON

IN D IA N A

|
|

COLORADO

M O N TA N A

N O R TH D A K O TA

M A R Y LA N D

|

K E N TU C K Y

COLORADO

|

M O N TA N A

M A IN E

OKLAHOM A

NEBRASKA

LOUISIANA

(232)




|
|

THOUSANDS

10
0_______ 20
0

3(X>

PLATE No. 204
FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION IN 1920, D IST R IB U T E D AS ARRIVING IN TH E U N ITED STA T ES BEFO RE




OR A FTER 1911.
THO USANDS

(2 3 3 )

PLATE No. 205

FOREIGN W HITE STOCK BY PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES OF O RIGIN: 1920.

GERMANY
IR E L A N D
R U S S IA
IT A L Y
A U S T R IA
CANADA
AND
N EW FO U N D LAN D
EN G LA N D
SW EDEN
HUNGARY
NORW AY
SC O TLAN D
M E X IC O

X ///////X

FO RE IGN B O R N .

F A T H E R BORN IN SPE CIFIE D C O U N T R Y

NETHERLAN DS

N A T IV E . BOTH

PA R E N TS B O R N IN SPE CIFIE D C O U N T R Y

FRANCE

N A T I V E , O N E PA R E N T BORN IN SP E CIFIE D C O U N T R Y , O T H E R IN U N IT E O 8T A TE S

DENMARK

S W IT Z E R L A N D
F IN L A N D
W ALES

2. FOREIGN W HITE STOCK BY PRIN CIPAL COUNTRIES OF O RIGIN: 1910.
M IL L IO N S

GERM ANY

7/////.% //////^

IR E LA N D
CANADA
R U S S IA

\ y / ///y \

BORN IN SPECIFIED COUNTRY

NATIVE .B O T H

N A TIV E , ONE

(2H
4)




PARENTS BORN IN SPECIFIED COUNTRY

PARENT BORN IN SP E CIFIE D

COUNTRY

OTHER IN UNITED STATES

PLATE No. 206

PER C EN T D ISTRIBU TIO N OF TH E FOREIGN W HITE STOCK BY PRIN CIPAL COU NTRIES OF ORIGIN:
1920, 1910, AND 1900.




1920

1910

1900

(235)

PLATE No. 207

DISTRIBUTION OF THE FOREIGN WHITE STOCK ORIGINATING IN SELECTED COUNTRIES AND GROUPS OF COUNTRIES,
BY STATES: 1920 AND 1910.
G ERM ANY
THOUSANDS
600

NEW YORK
ILLIN O IS
WISCONSIN
OHIO
PENNSYl V A N IA
M IC H IG A N
MINNESO TA
IOWA
NEW JERSEY
MISSOURI
IN D IA N A
C A LIFO R N IA
NEBRASKA
TEXAS
KANSAS
M A R Y LA N D
WASHINGTON
SOUTH DAKOTA
CO NNECTICUT
MASSACHUSETTS
K EN TU C K Y
NORTH DAKOTA
OREGON
COLORADO
O KLAHO MA
MO NTANA
LOU ISIANA
WEST V IR G IN IA
ARKANSAS
IDAHO
D IS T. OF CO LUM BIA
V IR G IN IA
FLO R ID A
TENNESSEE
UTAH
A LA B AM A

N O R W AY. SW EDEN.
AND DENM ARK

A U S T R IA A N D H U N G A R Y

THOUSANDS
0 _________

P EN N S YLV AN IA

M INN ESO TA

NEW YORK

ILL IN O IS

ILL IN O IS

WISCONSIN

OHIO

IOWA

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

M IC H IG A N

NORTH DAKOTA

WISCONSIN

WASHINGTON

M IN N ES O TA

C A LIFO R N IA
SOUTH DAKOTA

CONNECTICU T
MASSACHUSETTS

M IC H IG A N

NEBRASKA

NEBRASKA

TEXAS

MASSACHUSETTS

IN D IA N A

P EN NSYLVANIA

M IS S O U R I

M O NTA NA

C A L IF O R N IA

UTAH

IO W A

OREGON

WEST V IR G IN IA

CO NNECTICU T

KANSAS

NEW JERSEY

W ASHINGTON

KANSAS

M A R Y LA N D

COLORADO

COLORADO

IDAHO

■
3
9
P

MO NTANA

OHIO

NORTH DAKOTA

TEXAS

SOUTH D A K q
KQ^

MISSOURI

RHODE ISLAND
an F

IN D IA N A

OREGON

RHODE ISLA ND

O KLA HO M A

(236)




<1H
93 B

H"
W

9
S
9
B

20 0

400

000

PLATE No. 224

PROPORTION THAT MALES AND FEM ALES 10 Y EA RS OF AGE AND OVER WITH GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS FORMED
OF A LL MALES AND FEM A LES 10 Y EA RS OF AGE AND OVER: 1920 AND 1910.
M ALES

7 2 3 “— 2 4 t -----




17

PER C EN T

FEM A LES

(253)

PLATE No. 225
1. PROPORTION THAT M ALES AND FEM A LES 10 Y EA RS OF AGE AND OVER ENGAGED IN GA IN FU L OCCUPATIONS
FORMED OF T H E TOTAL POPULATION 10 Y EA R S OF AGE AND OVER OCCUPIED, BY STA T ES: 1920 AND 1910.
FEM ALES

M ALE S

PE R C E N T

PER CENT
ID A H O

ID A H O

WJ M
MM j

W Y O M IN G

W Y O M IN G

NEVADA

NEVADA

W E S T V IR G IN IA

W E S T V IR G IN IA

N E W M E X IC O

N E W M E X IC O

M ONTANA

M ONTANA

NORTH DAKOTA

NORTH DAKOTA

SO UTH D A K O T A

SO UTH D A K O T A

OKLAHOM A

OKLAHOM A

A R IZ O N A

A R IZ O N A
U T AH

UTAH
KA N SAS

--- ---i— --: __
—_

K A N S AS

KENTUCKY

KENTUCKY

NEBRASKA

N EBRASKA

W A S H IN G T O N

W A S H IN G T O N

IOWA

IOWA

IN D IA N A

IN D IA N A

M IC H IG A N

M IC H IG A N

OREGON

OR E G O N

C O LO R A D O

C O LO R A D O

TEXAS

TEXAS
OH IO

OH IO

^9 &

M IN N E S O T A

M IN N E S O T A

A R K A N SA S

A R K A N SA S

W ISCON SIN

W ISC O N SIN

TE N N ESSE E

T E N N ESSE E

M ISSOURI

M ISSOU R I

V IR G IN IA

V IR G IN IA

C A LIF O R N IA

C A L IF O R N IA

VERM ON T
DE LA W A R E

D ELAW ARE

P E N N SY L V A N IA

P E N N SY L V A N IA

IL L IN O I8

V SSSSSSSS/S/SS/SSS/Z
/S

BgjgHBf

ILLIN O IS
M AIN E

M AIN E

F L O R ID A

FL O R ID A
LO U ISIA N A

'// S /S /S // /S // S S S // // // // // // // // /S S //
/// /// /S /S S /S / S S // // / // / S // /S /S // // /.

LO U ISIA N A

N E W JE R SE Y

S // ///////////////////////////////////S
/// //S
//////////////4
//////////////////////J

NEW JER SEY

N O R T H C A R O L IN A

N O R T H C A R O L IN A

M ARYLAND

M ARYLAND

A LA B AM A

ALABAM A

C O N N E C T IC U T

C O N N E C T IC U T

N EW YO RK

NEW YO RK

N E W H A M P S H IR E

N E W H A M P S H IR E

G E O R G IA

GE O R G IA

M ISSISSIPP I

M ISSISSIPPI

M A S SA C H U S E TTS

M A S SA C H U S E TTS

R H O D E ISLA N O

R H O D E ISLA N D

8 0 U T H C A R O L IN A

SO UTH C A R O L IN A

mamma

D I 8 T . OF C O L U M B IA

D I 8 T . OF C O L U M B IA £
E Z Z 2Z 3I9I0

2. PROPORTION OF C H ILD R EN OF EACH S E X 10 TO 15 YEA RS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS:
1880-1920.
PE R C E N T

kzwi----------------------------------------10

1910

20

30

40

60

WA
' ---------~ T ___ 1 1 1 1
J
l
l

mm

T

l

l

l

'

l

60

1
l

l

; ;
------ -----1 1 1
1

70

80

1

BO

'l

l

1

IO
C

"

1

m m -------------------------------------;----------------------

........ ///>
y ////z
'
1

m r /A '

i

i

1

0 5 5 2 M AL ES

(254)




'

i

i

1....- 1
-

i

i

X///////A

'■

F E M AL E S

i

1

PLATE No. 226

PROPORTION OF CHILDREN OF EACH SEX 10 TO 15 YEARS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STATES,
ARRANGED BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920 AND 1910.
NEW
0

|0

20

30

40

ENG LAND

PER C E N T
60
60

EAST
70

80

90

100

0

10

20

30

40

NORTH CEN TR AL
PER C E N T
60
60

70

80

, 00

1920
O H IO

M A IN E

1910
1920
N. K.

IN D.

1910
l

l

l

l

I

1

I

I

1

I

1920
VT.

IL L .

1910
1920
M ASS.

M IC H .

1910
i

J

I

i

I

1

I

1

!

1920

R. L

W IS .

1910
1920
CONN.
KY.

1910
MIDDLE ATLA NTIC
1920

TEN N .

N . Y.

1910
1920
ALA.

N . J.

1910
1920
PA.

M IS S .

1910
WEST NORTH CENTRAL
1920
M IN N .

ARK.

1910
1920
LA .

IO W A

1910
1920
M O.

1910

'■
A
’

|

>szr

1
.

|______ ,
_
*
i

.

.
.

,

,_______ ,

T
,

:

.

:

OKLA.

1920
TEX.

N. D AK.

1910
1920
S. DAK.

M ONT.

1910
i

i

i ______________ i_______ i_______i_______________i
_
_______

1920 i---------- *
----------- 1
----------- 1

-1

‘

‘

1

1

1

NEBR.

ID A H O

1910
1920
KANS.

WYO.

1910
SOUTH ATLA NTIC
1920

COLO .

DEL.

1910
1920
N. M EX

M D.

1910
1920
A R IZ .

1910
A

1

" J

1

i

i

i

i

i

1

1920
UTAH

1910
1920
NEV.

W . VA.

1910
1920
N. C.

W ASH.

1910
1920

1

6 . C-

1

:
OREO.

1910
1920
OA.

1910

CAUF-

.

|

|

|

|

|

i

^
H W f f l MALES

1910




V ///////Z Z A

FEM
ALES

(255)

100

PLATE No. 227
I.

PROPORTION OF M ARRIED AND OF SINGLE, W IDOW ED, DIVORCED, 2. PROPORTION OF WOMEN 15 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER IN EACH
AND UNKNOWN WOMEN AMONG GAINFULLY OCCUPIED WOMEN 15
SPECIFIED AGE PERIOD AND M ARITAL CLASS ENGAGED IN GAINFUL
YEARS OF AGE A N D OVER: 1890-1920.
OCCUPATIONS: 1920.
PER C EN T
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70.

SO

90

100

15 T O 19 VEAR 8

20 TO 24 YEARS

25 T O 4 4 YEA R S

46 Y EA R 8 AND OVER

M A R R IE D

m a r r ie d

S IN G L E . W ID O W E D . D IV O R C E D .

AND

UNKNOW N

XO M M A S IN G L E ■ W ID O W E D . D IV O R C E D . A N D

UNKNOW N

3. PROPORTION OF WOMEN 15 YEARS OF AGE A N D OVER IN EACH 4. PROPORTION OF M A R R IE D A N D OF SIN GLE, W IDOW ED, DIVORCED,
SPECIFIED M A RITAL CLASS ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: A N D UNKNOWN WOMEN 15 YEARS OF AGE A N D OVER IN EACH
1890-1920.
PRINCIPAL CLASS OF TH E POPULATION ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCU­
PATIONS: 1920.
PER C EN T
0

10

20

30

40

60
PER C E N T

K 8 & 8 8 M A R R IE D

V//7
7 //A

S I N G L E . W ID O W E D . D IV O R C E D .

S I N G L E . W I D O W E D . D IV O R C E D . A N D
UNKNOW N

A N D UNKNOW N

5. PROPORTION OF M A RRIED AND OF SIN G L E , WIDOWED, DIVORCED, AND UNKNOWN WOMEN AMONG WOMEN 15
YEA RS OF AGE AND OVER IN EACH G EN ER A L DIVISION OF GA IN FU L OCCUPATIONS: 1920.
PER CEN T
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A L L O C C U P A T IO N S
E X T R A C T IO N O F M IN E R A L S
A G R IC U L T U R E , F O R E S T R Y . A N D A N IM A L H U S B A N D R Y
P U B L IC S E R V IC E (N O T E L S E W H E R E C L A S S IF IE D )
D O M E S T IC A N D P E R S O N A L S E R V IC E
M A N U F A C T U R IN G A N D M E C H A N IC A L IN D U S T R IE S
TRADE
T R A N S P O R T A T IO N
P R O F E S S IO N A L S E R V IC E
C L E R IC A L O C C U P A T IO N S
M A R R IE D

V //////A

S IN G L E . W ID O W E D . D IV O R C E D .

(256)




AN D UNKNOW N

PLATE No. 228

PROPORTION OF M ARRIED WOMEN 15 Y EA RS OF AGE AND OVER ENGAGED IN GA IN FU L OCCUPATIONS, BY STA T ES:
1920 AND 1910.
PER C E N T

s

1
0

15

20

25

30

35

40

S O U T H C A R O L IN A
D I8 T . OF C O L U M B IA
M IS S IS S IP P I
G E O R G IA
F L O R ID A
A LABAM A
L O U IS IA N A
N E W H A M P S H IR E
N O R T H C A R O L IN A
R H O D E IS L A N D
M ASSACHUSETTS
M ARYLAND
ARKAN SAS
C O N N E C T IC U T
C A L IF O R N IA
M A IN E
NEVADA
A R IZ O N A
TEXAS
V IR G I N I A
TENNESSEE
DELAW AR E
NEW YORK
OREGON
W A S H IN G T O N
VERM ONT
N E W JE R S E Y
COLOR AD O
IL L IN O IS
W Y O M IN G
M IS S O U R I
O KLAHO M A
M IC H IG A N
KENTUCKY
O H IO
M O NTANA
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
N E W M E X IC O
I N D IA N A
NEBRASKA
ID A H O
KANSAS
IO W A
UTAH
M IN N E S O T A
S O U TH D A K O T A
W IS C O N S IN
W E S T V IR G IN IA
NO RTH D AKO TA




(2 5 7 )

PLATE No. 229
P E R C EN T D ISTRIBU TIO N , BY M ARITAL CONDITION, OF TH E GA IN FU LLY OCCUPIED WOMEN 15 Y EA R S OF AGE AND
OVER, BY STA T ES: 1920.
PER CEN T
10

20

40

60

60

W IS C O N S IN
M IN N E S O T A
NORTH DAKOTA
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
NEW YORK
IO W A
N E W JE R S E Y
UTAH
SOUTH D A K O T A
IL L IN O IS
W E S T V IR G I N I A
O H IO
IN D IA N A
C O N N E C T IC U T
MASSACH USETTS
NEBRASKA
R H O D E IS L A N D
M IS S O U R I
KANSAS
M IC H IG A N
VERMONT
M O NTANA
CO LORADO
M ARYLAND
KENTUCKY
DELAW AR E
D IS T . O F C O L U M B IA

m m m m m m m im m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ;////////////////////,

M A IN E
ID A H O
N E W M E X IC O
C A L IF O R N IA

mmmmmmmmmmfffmmmmmmmtmmmmmmm / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

W A S H IN G T O N
N E W H A M P S H IR E

m m M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m //////////////////////,

V IR G IN IA
OREGON
W Y O M IN G
OKLAHO M A
TENNESSEE

wmmmMMmMMMmMmmmmmmMMmsmMmmm,////////////////////////

TEXAS
N O R T H C A R O L IN A
NEVADA
L O U IS IA N A
A R IZ O N A
ARKANSAS
ALABAM A
G E O R G IA
F L O R ID A
S O U T H C A R O L IN A
M IS S IS S IP P I

S IN G L E . W ID O W E D . D IV O R C E D . A N D U N K N O W N

(258)




V S S /A

M A R R IE D

PLATE No. 230

1. PROPORTION OF MALES 10 TO 13 YEARS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PROPORTION OF M ALES 10 TO 13 Y EA RS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GA IN FU L OCCUPATIONS, BY ST A T E S: 1910.




(259)

PLATE No. 231

1. PROPORTION OF MALES 14 AND 15 YEARS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STATES: 1920

2. PROPORTION OF M ALES 14 AND 15 Y EA R S OF AGE ENGAGED IN GA IN FU L OCCUPATIONS, BY STA T ES: 1910.

(260)




PLATE No. 232

1. PROPORTION OF FEMALES 10 TO 13 YEARS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PROPORTION OF FEM A LE S 10 TO 13 Y EA RS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, B Y STA T ES: 1910.




(261)

PLATE No. 233

1. PROPORTION OF FEMALES 14 AND 15 YEARS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PROPORTION OF FEM A LES 14 AND 15 YEA RS OF AGE ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS, BY STA T ES: 1910.

(262)




PLATE No. 234

PROPORTION OF MALES AND FEMALES 10 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER ENGAGED IN CERTAIN
GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: 1920.




A L L O C C U P A T IO N S
A G R IC U L T U R E . F O R E S T R Y . A N D A N IM A L H U S B A N D R Y :
F IS H E R M E N A N D O Y S T E R M E N
STOCK HERD ER S. DROVERS. A N D FEEDERS
D A IR Y F A R M E R S
S T O C K R A IS E R S
D A IR Y F A R M L A B O R E R S
FARM ERS
G A R D E N E R S . F L O R IS T S , F R U I T G R O W E R S . A N D N U R S E R Y M E N
G A R D E N . G R EE N H O U S E, O R C H A R D . A N D N U R S E R Y LABO RERS
M A N U F A C T U R IN G A N D M E C H A N IC A L IN D U S T R IE S :
S H O E M A K E R S A N D C O B B L E R S (N O T IN F A C T O R Y )
P A IN T E R S . G L A Z IE R S . V A R N IS H E R S . E N A M E L E R S . E T C .
L A B O R E R S - M E T A L IN D U S T R IE S
M A N A G E R S A N D S U P E R IN T E N D E N T S (M A N U F A C T U R IN G )
L A B O R E R S - L U M B E R A N D F U R N IT U R E IN D U S T R IE S
L A B O R E R S -C L A Y . G L A S S . A N D S T O N E IN D U S T R IE S
M A N U F A C T U R E R S A N D O F F IC IA L S
BAKERS
A P P R E N T IC E S
C O M P O S IT O R S . L I N O T Y P E R S . A N D T Y P E S E T T E R S
F O R E M E N A N D O V E R S E E R S (M A N U F A C T U R IN G )
L A B O R E R S -F O O D IN D U S T R IE S
S E M I S K I L L E D O P E R A T IV E S - L U M B E R A N D F U R N IT U R E IN D U S T R IE S
S E M I S K I L L E D O P E R A T I V E S - M E T A L IN D U S T R I E S
S E M IS K IL L E D

O P E R A T IV E S - C L A Y . G L A S S . A N D

STONE

IN D U S T R IE S

T A I L O R S A N D T A IL O R E S S E S
L A B O R E R S -B A K E R IE S
L A B O R E R S -C O T T O N M IL L S
L A B O R E R S -P R IN T IN G A N D P U B L IS H IN G
S E M I S K I L L E D O P E R A T IV E S - 8 H O E F A C T O R IE S
S E M IS K IL L E D O P E R A T IV E S - C H E M IC A L A N D

A L L IE D

IN D U S T R IE S

S E M I S K I L L E D O P E R A T IV E S -F O O D IN D U S T R IE S
L A B O R E R S - C lG A R A N D T O B A C C O F A C T O R IE S
T R A N S P O R T A T IO N :
L A B O R E R S -( S T E A M R A IL R O A D )
M A I L C A R R IE R S
TE LE G R A P H OPERATORS
TE LE P H O N E OPERATORS
TRADE:
W H O L E S A L E D E A L E R S . IM P O R T E R S . A N D E X P O R T E R S
C O M M E R C IA L T R A V E L E R S
BANKERS. BROKERS. AN D M O N EY

LEN DER S

IN S U R A N C E A G E N T S A N D O F F I C I A L S
R E T A IL D E A L E R S
R E A L E S T A T E A G E N T S A N D O F F IC IA L S
L A B O R E R S . P O R T E R S . A N D H E L P E R S IN S T O R E S
S A LE SM EN A N D SA LE SW O M E N
C L E R K S IN S T O R E S
P U B L IC S E R V IC E ( N O T E L S E W H E R E C L A S S IF IE D )L A B O R E R S ( P U B L IC S E R V IC E )
O F F IC IA L S A N D IN S P E C T O R S ( C I T Y A N D C O U N T Y )
O F F IC IA L S A N D

IN S P E C T O R S ( 8 T A T E A N D U N I T E D S T A T E S )

P R O F E S S IO N A L S E R V IC E :
P H Y S IC IA N S A N D S U R G E O N S
ACTORS A N D S H O W M E N
A R T IS T S . S C U L P T O R S . A N D T E A C H E R S O F A R T
M U S IC IA N S A N D T E A C H E R S O F M U S IC
TEACHERS
T R A IN E D N U R S E S
D O M E S T IC A N D P E R S O N A L S E R V IC E :
SALO O N K E E P E R S
L A B O R E R S ( D O M E S T IC A N D P R O F E S S IO N A L S E R V IC E )
B A R B E R S . H A IR D R E S S E R 8 . A N D M A N IC U R IS T S
J A N IT O R S A N D S E X T O N S
R E S T A U R A N T . C A F E . A N D L U N C H -R O O M

KEEPERS

H O TEL KEEPERS AN D MANAGERS
W A IT E R S
L A U N D R Y O P E R A T IV E S
COOKS
C H AR W O M EN A N D C LE AN ER 8
SERVANTS
B O A R D IN G A N D L O D G IN G H O U S E K E E P E R S
M ID W IV E S A N D N U R S E S (N O T T R A IN E D )
HOUSEKEEPERS AN D STEW ARDS
L A U N D E R E R S A N D L A U N D R E S S E S (N O T IN L A U N D R Y )
C L E R I C A L O C C U P A T IO N S :
A G E N T8. CANVASSERS. A N D C O LLE C TO R S
M E S S E N G E R . B U N D L E . A N D O F F IC E B O Y S A N D G IR L S
C L E R K S (E X C E P T C L E R K S IN S T O R E S )
B O O K K E E P E R S . C A S H IE R S . A N D A C C O U N T A N T S
S T E N O G R A P H E R S A N D T Y P IS T S

V ////Z //A

FEM ALES

(263)

PLATE No. 235

PROPORTION OF POPULATION 10 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER ENGAGED IN EACH GENERAL DIVISION OF GAINFUL
OCCUPATIONS, CLASSIFIED AS INDUSTRIAL AND NONINDUSTRIAL, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920.
NEW ENGLAND

EAST NORTH CENTRAL

(264)




M IDD LE A TLA N TIC

WEST NORTH CENTRAL

PLATE No. 236

p r o p o r t i o n o f p o p u l a t i o n io y e a r s o f a g e a n d o v e r e n g a g e d i n e a c h g e n e r a l d i v i s i o n o f g a i n f u l

OCCUPATIONS, CLASSIFIED AS INDUSTRIAL AND NONINDUSTRIAL, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920.




8 0 U T H A T L A N T IC

EA ST SO UTH C E N T R A L

PLATE No, 237

PROPORTION OF POPULATION 10 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER, IN EACH STATE, ENGAGED IN EACH
GENERAL DIVISION OF GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: 1920.
PER

CENT

M IS S IS S IP P I

1/ / / /
1

ARKANSAS

W i V ///

S O U T H C A R O L IN A
NORTH

DAKO TA

-

ALABAM A
G E O R G IA
SOUTH D A K O TA
NORTH

C A R O L IN A

'

TENNESSEE

>- ' i 1
11 //////.
1
X\\\%$gg88Sgg 11111////
w m m tm
4
1
1
•VX\\N
•
8RSS$$6I111

ID A H O

1 1 1vs///.

KE N TU C KY
TEXAS

1

|

L O U IS IA N A
NEBRASKA

i

M E X IC O

im

m m m m m -^^m ssssssa 1 1 y / / / .
11 /
WWW////
ill II//////A
8 M iN H H Ii
! 111 Y //A .111
| W Y //A
W
mmmmm

O KLAH O M A
NEW

E

M O N TAN A

I K ///

IO W A

1 111V
1

KANSAS

//A

!lll V//////.

V IR G IN IA
M IN N E S O T A
F L O R ID A

__

VERM O NT

g

mmmmm

1111V/////////.

\

him v/ / / / / .

»\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W * 1 1 Y ////A
11 1

W Y O M IN G

WWW////.

W IS C O N S IN
M IS S O U R I

111111V////
=l l l l l l l l * * ^

UTAH

mmmmm

OREGON
A R IZ O N A

mm / / / / / / .

mmmmmmm

C O LO RA D O
IN D IA N A

\\\\\N
»$&»il 1 1 //A
1Y

W E S T V IR G IN IA
M A IN E

m iy/ / / / / /

NEVADA

i i ii iY

W A S H IN G T O N

DELAW ARE

w\w\\///////.
\\w ///////

C A L IF O R N IA
M AR YLAN D
NEW

/////

•:x ^ ^ ^ r\ \ w x »^ g g g o ;
•
m
m m *m m //////A

M IC H IG A N

H A M P S H IR E

O H IO

IIY////
»^M^X\\\\MSg355Sga6g<

IL L IN O IS
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
NEW

YORK

C O N N E C T IC U T
NEW

mmm

11 1
1

X\\\\N
%gg8gg88«B 1 1 Y
11

JE R S E Y

I

M ASSACHUSETTS
RHODE

IS L A N D

D IS T . O F C O L U M B IA

IIIY//////////S.
j A G R IC U L T U R E , F O R E S T R Y . A N D A N IM A L
(E X T R A C T IO N

S

3

HUSBANDRY

O F M IN E R A L S

| M A N U F A C T U R IN G
S

T R A N S P O R T A T IO N

AN D

TRADE
^

M E C H A N IC A L IN D U S T R IE S

H

| P U B L IC S E R V IC E (N O T E L S E W H E R E C L A S S IF IE D )
l f f i P R O F E S S IO N A L S E R V IC E

/A
C L E R I C A L O C C U P A T IO N S

(266)




//S .

Y /////.

D O M E S T IC A N D

P E R S O N A L S E R V IC E

PLATE No. 238

1. PROPORTION OF MALES AND FEMALES 10 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER ENGAGED IN EACH GENERAL DIVISION OF
GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: 1920.
PER C E N T

E m

i M ALES

FEM ALES

l PROPORTION WHICH GAINFUL WORKERS OF BOTH SEXES, IN EACH

3.

SPECIFIED AGE GROUP, CONSTITUTED OF ALL GAINFUL WORKERS,
AND THE PROPORTION WHICH MALES AND FEMALES OF EACH AGE
GROUP FORMED OF TOTAL MALE A N D FEMALE W ORKERS: 1920.

PER CENT
IQ

20

30

40

SO

60

BOTH 8EXES
kL L CLASSES

MALES
FEMALES
BOTH SEXES

NATIVE WHITE -

MALES

NATIVE PARENTAOE

FEMALES
BOTH 8E X E S
NATIVE WHITE FOREIGN OR MIXED PARENTAGE

BOTH 8EXE8
FOREIGN-BORN WHITE

MALES
FEMALES
BOTH 8E X E 8
MALES
FEMALES

PROPORTION OF MALES AND FEMALES OF EACH SPECIFIED AGE
GROUP ENGAGED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: 1920.
PER CENT
10
1 0 TO 13 Y E A R S

|4

« D

16 YEARS

20

7

YEAR S

18 A N D 19 YEAR S

40

50

60

j 1 i
L

i

70

80

i

90

I

100

i

FEM ALES K

M ALE S w M /m
PE M A LE S m m

m

1
6 AND

30

V/A
M ALE S

M A LE S
F EM ALES
M ALES

|

4.

2 0 TO 2 4 YEARS

F EM ALES

YE AR S

“ »LE »

4 6 TO 6 4

YEARS

M ALE S
F EM ALES
“ “

88 YE AR S A N D OVER

l

---------- 1
---------- 1
---------- 1
---------- 1
---------- 1
---------- 1
----------I --------

M ALE S
F EM ALES
“

AOE UNKNOWN

l

|

2 6 TO 4 4

1




PROPORTION OF EACH PRINCIPAL C U S S OF P O P U U T IO N 10 YEARS
OF AGE AND OVER, BOTH SEXES, MALES AND FEMALES, ENGAGED
IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS: 1920.

n

i

i

i

i

t

i

i

i

f £ „ A L It

(207)

70

80

80







AGRICULTURE
PLATES 239-341

AGRICULTURE
F un

Tr

No.

u

.

239 Relative proportion of improved and unimproved land
area in farms to the total land area of the United States:
1850-1920.
240 Number of farms, January 1,1920 (dot map).
1. Improved and unimproved land in farms, and land not
in farms, by states: 1920 and 1910.
241 • 2. Improved and unimproved land in farms, and land not
in farms, in the United States: 1850-1920.
3. Number of farms in the United States: 1850-1920.
1. Per cent of total land area in farms, by states: 1920
(map).
242 2. Per cent of increase in population and agriculture:
1910-1920.
1. Average acreage of all land per farm, by states: 1920
(map).
243 2. Average acreage of all land per farm, by states: 1910
(map).
1. Average acreage of improved land per farm, by states:
1920 (map).
244 2. Proportion of improved land in farms to total land
area: 1910 (map).
245 Improved land in farms, January 1, 1920 (dot map),
fl. Average size of farms, by states: 1920 and 1910.
246 \2. Average size of farms, by states: 1900 and 1890.
Per cent of value of all farm property represented by each
class of property, by states:
1. 1920.
247 • 2. 1910.
3. Average value of farm land and buildings per acre:
1850-1920.
,4. Value of farm property, by classes: 1850-1920.
248 Average value of farm land and buildings per acre, by
counties: 1920 (map).
1. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1850-1860 (map).
249 2. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1860-1870 (map).
fl. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1870-1880 (map).
250 'I2. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1880-1890 (map).
1. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1890-1900 (map).
251 ' 2. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, In­
states: 1900-1910 (map).
1. Per cent of increase in value of all farm property, by
states: 1910-1920 (map).
252
2. Value of agricultural products, by states: 1920 (map).
1 . Value of implements and machinery per acre of im­
proved
in farms,
253 ' 2. Value of land stock per by states:all1920 (map). by
live
acre of land in farms,
states: 1920 (map).
(270)




P lats

No.

T k lb .

Number of farms— Per cent distribution by tenure, by
states:
1. 1920.
2. 1910.
A ll farm land— Per cent distribution by tenure, by states:
1. 1920.
2. 1910.
256 Number of farms operated by tenants, January 1, 1929
(dot m ap).
257 P a cent of all farms operated by tenants, by counties:
1920 (map.)
1. Per cent of all farm land operated by tenants, by
states: 1920 (m ap).
2. Per emit of all farm land operated by tenants, by
states: 19.10 (m ap).
1. P a cent of improved farm land operated by tenants,
by states: 1920 (m ap).
2. P a cent of improved farm land operated by tenants,
by states: 1910 (map).
1. W hite farmers— P a cent distribution by tenure, by
states, 1920.
2 . Colored farmers— Per cent distribution by tenure, by
states: 1920.
3. P a cent distribution of farms in the United States,
by tenure: 1880-1920.
4. W hite farmers in the South— Per cent distribution,
by tenure, 1900-1920.
5. Colored farmers in the South— Per cent distribution,
by tenure: 1900-1920.
•1. W hite farmers— Per cent operating rented farms, by
states: 1920 (m ap).
2. Colored farmers— Per cent operating rented farms,
by states: 1920 (m ap).
1 . White farmers— Per cent of farm land operated by
tenants, by states: 1920 (map).
2. Colored farmers— Per cent of farm land operated by
tenants, by states: 1920 (map).
1 . Number of farms— P a cent distribution by race and
nativity of farmer, by states: 1920.
(2 . Number of farms— Per cent distribution by race and
nativity of farm a, by states: 1910.
1 . All farm land— P a cent distribution by race and
nativity of fanner, by states: 1920.
2. Foreign-born white farmers in the United States, by
country of birth: 1920 and 1910.
3. White farm tenants and owners in the South, hv age:
1920.
4. Colored farm tenants and owners in the South, by age
1920.
5. Farm tenants and owners in the United States, by age
1920.

254

255

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

STATISTICAL ATLAS.
PT
lA E
AO.

T itle .

265 Per cent of all farms operated by colored farmers, by
counties: 1920.
1. Per cent of all farm land operated by colored farmers,
by states: 1920 (map).
266
2. Per cent of all farm land operated by colored farmers,
by states: 1910 (map).
1. Per cent of improved farm land operated by colored
farmers, by states: 1920 (Southern States only) (map).
267 2. Per cent of improved farm land operated by colored
farmers, by states: 1910 (Southern States only) (map).
1. Per cent distribution of owner-operated farms accord­
ing to mortgage status, by states: 1920.
2. Ratio of mortgage debt to value of mortgaged farms,
268
by states: 1920.
3. Per cent distribution of owner-operated farms in the
United States, according to mortgage status: 1890-1920.
269 Mortgage debt on owner-operated farms, by states:
1920 and 1910.
1. Farm expenditures for labor, by states: 1919 and 1909.
270 2. Farm expenditures for feed, by states: 1919 and 1909.
3. Farm expenditures for fertilizer, 36 leading states:
. 1919 and 1909.
1. Per cent of all farms reporting telephones, by states:
271 2. 1920 (map).purchases by farmers through cooperative
Sales and
organizations, 20 leading states: 1919.
272 Number of automobiles on farms: 1920 (dot map).
273 Beef cattle on farms, Jan. 1 , 1920 (dot map).
274 Dairy cows on farms, Jan. 1 , 1920 (dot map).
275 Swine on farms, Jan. 1 , 1920 (dot map).
276 Value of dairy products sold by farmers in 1919 (dot map).
1. Eggs produced on farms, by states: 1919 and 1909.
277 2. Wool produced, 16 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
3. Butter made on farms and in factories: 1879-1919.
278 1. Calves raised on farms, by states: 1919.
2. Pigs raised on farms, by states: 1919.
1. Value of
by states: 1919 and 1909.
279 2. All farm all farm crops,by states: 1909 (map).
crops—value,
1. Average value of all farm crops per farm, by states:
1919 and 1909.
2X
0
2. Average value per acre of crops with acreage reports,
by states: 1919 and 1909.
1. Production of wheat in the United States: 1849-1919.
2. Production of corn in the United States: 1849-1919.
3. Production of wheat, 15 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
4. Production of corn, 20 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
281
5. Production of oats in the United States: 1849-1919.
6. Production of buckwheat, 5 leading states: 1919 and
1909.
7. Production of oats, 15 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
.3. Production of barley, 10 leading states: 1919 and 1909.




P late

N
*o.

! 282

! 283
284
285
j

2S6

.

287

|
; 288

289
;
'
290

291

| 292
;
293

271
T itle .

1. Production of potatoes, 20 leading states: 1919 and
1909.
2. Production of sweet potatoes, 15 leading states: 1919
and 1909.
3. Production of rye, 10 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
4. Production of tobacco, 15 leading states: 1919 and
1909.
5. Value of vegetables raised for sale, 12 leading states:
1919.
6. Production of cotton in the United States: 1849-1919.
7. Production of cotton, 15 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
Corn production in 1919 (dot map).
Wheat production in 1919 (dot map).
Oats production in 1919 (dot map).
Cotton production in 1919 (dot map).
1. Per cent of all farms operated by tenants, by geo­
graphic divisions: 1880-1920.
2. Per cent of tenancy in each age group, for selected
states: 1920.
Per cent of improved land in farms operated by ten­
ants, owners, and managers, for selected states:
1920.
2 Relation between quality of soil and per cent of ten­
ancy: Monroe, Northampton, Lehigh, and Carbon
Counties, Pa. (map).
<1. Per cent of farms operated by tenants, by counties:
1920 (map).
2 Per cent of farms operated by tenants, by counties:
1880 (map).
Number and per cent of tenants and owners, by age,
for the North, South, and West: 1920.
Average value of farm property per farm, and per cent
represented by land, for owners and tenants in
selected States: 1920.
■
Per cent of tenancy in each age group, for the North,
South, and West: 1890-1920.
Per cent distribution of value of live stock, by classes,
and average value per farm, for owners and tenants,
in selected states: 1920.
Per cent distribution of farms and farm acreage, by
tenure, for the North, South, and West: 1920.
Per cent of total value of farm property represented
by each class, for owners and tenants, in the North,
South, and West: 1920.
Per cent of tenants in each labor-income group, YazooMississippi Delta: 1913.
Return on landlord’s investment, in relation to ten­
ant’s labor income, Yazoo-Mississippi Delta: 1913.

DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION.
Plate

P late

T itle .

N o.

T itle .

No.

IRRIGATION.

DRAINAGE.
294

295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322

Approximate location and area of operating drainage
enterprises in the United States: 1920 (map).
Approximate location and area of operating drainage
enterprises: 1920 (maps)—
Arkansas.
California.
Colorado.
Florida.
Georgia.
Idaho.
Illinois.
Indiana.
Iowa.
Kansas.
Kentucky and Tennessee.
Louisiana.
Michigan.
Minnesota.
Mississippi.
Missouri.
Montana.
Nebraska.
North Carolina.
North Dakota.
Ohio.
South Carolina.
South Dakota.
Texas.
Utah.
Washington.
Wisconsin.
Wyoming.

( 272)




323

A p p ro xim a te lo c a tio n and e xte n t o f irrig a te d areas in th *

United States: 1920 (map).

A p p ro xim a te lo ca tio n and e xte n t o f irrig a te d la n d : 192°
(m aps)—

324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338

Arizona.
Arkansas.
California.
Colorado.
Idaho.
Kansas.
Louisiana.
Montana.
Nebraska.
Nevada.
New Mexico.
North Dakota.
Oregon.
South Dakota.
Texas.

339

Utah.

340 Washington.
341 Wyoming.

PLATE No. 239
RELA TIV E p r o p o r t i o n o f i m p r o v e d a n d u n i m p r o v e d l a n d a r e a i n f a r m s t o t h e t o t a l
OF T H E U N ITED STA T ES: 1850-1920.




I860

land

I860

(273)

area




PLATE No. 240

PLATE No. 241
1. IMPROVED AND UNIMPROVED LAND IN FARM S, AND LAND NOT IN FARMS, BY STA T ES: 1920 AND 1910.
M IL L IO N S OF ACRES
SO

■

H

IM P R O V E D L A N D

H W K M ta U N IM P R O V E D
l a n d

n o t

in

IN

LAND

FARM S
IN

FARMS

f a r m s

2. IMPROVED AND UNIMPROVED LAND IN F A R M S,A N D LAND N O T IN
FARMS, IN TH E UNITED STATES: 1850-1920.
H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S O F A C R E S

4

IM P R O V E D

3.

6

8

H

a

10

12

14

U N IM P R O V E D

16

ZWZVi N O T

20

IN F A R M S

NUMBER OF FARMS IN THE UNITED STATES: 1850-1920.
M IL L IO N S O F F A R M S

0

1

2

3

4

6

l»IO|




(275)

PLATE No. 242

I. PE R C EN T OF TOTAL LAND AREA IN FARM S, BY STA T ES: 1920.

2. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN POPULATION AND AGRICULTURE: 1910-1920.

0
P O P U L A T IO N
URBAN
RURAL

A G R IC U L T U R E
N U M B E R OF FARMS
A L L L A N D IN F A R M S
IM P R O V E D L A N D I N F A R M S
V A LU E OF A L L

F A R M PROPERTY

L A N D A N D B U IL D IN G S
LAN D

ALO N E

B U IL D IN G S
IM P L E M E N T S A N D M A C H IN E R Y
L IV E

(276)




STOCK

PER C E N T
50

10
0

60

200




PLATE No.
I. AVERAGE ACREAGE OF ALL LAND PER FARM, BY STA TES: 1920.

2. AVERAGE ACREAGE OF ALL LAND PE R FARM, BY STA TES: 1910.

(277)

PLATE No. 244

1. AVERAGE ACREAGE OF IMPROVED LAND P E R FARM, BY STA T ES: 1920.

2. PROPORTION OF IM PROVED LAND IN FARMS TO TOTAL LAND AREA: 1910.

(278i




PLATE No. 245

(Cir)




PLATE No. 246
I. AVERAGE SIZE OF FARMS, B Y STATES: 1920 AND 1910.
H U ND R E D S OF ACRE8

MAINE
N. H.
VT.
M A 88 .

R. I.
CONN.
N. Y .

§5

N. J.
PA.

( O H IO
I IN D .

) IL L
j M IC H .
> W I8.
M IN N .
IO W A
MO,

B H sjp
HS

bJ O N . D A K .
*X
8. D A K .

h

NEBR.
K A N 8.

OEL.
MD.

WP
BB

D. C.

B

VA.
W . VA.
H

N. C.

8.

OA.

P

FLA.

j

KV*

: TENN.
| ALA.
* M IS S .

S S S ii

B i
BB

ARK.

u
a>tO K LA.
uO

*

i

1920

W///11910
////

C.

W Www
W

TEX.
M ONT.
IO A H O
W YO.
C O LO .
N. M E X .
A R IZ .
UTAH
NEV.
W ASH.
OREO .

►m f
'c S .



rw /w w <

2. AVERAGE SIZE OF FARMS, B Y STATES: 1900 AND 1890.
HUND R ED S OF

ACRES

PLATE No. 247

1. PER CENT QF VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY REPRESENTED
BY EACH CLASS OF PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PER CENT OF VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY REPRESENTED
BY EACH CLASS OF PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1910.

PER C EN T
10

20

80

40

60

80

8 0 ______0 0 ______ lO©

70

O
Z

M A IN E
N . H.

*V T .
Z
U

M ASS.

u
Z

R. I.
CONN.

O N.

Y / / y / / / A y y A/ / / y / / S I S X/
/ / / y / / / / y y ' y / Z y M S SS J f r
A

Y.

w //z ymy.

S < N . J.

\y////Ay/////)m/^

PA.

's s s s s s s s * /

// /

< O H IO

oc

*2 IN O .

£3 IL L . •
» 0

m&yyyr/myAyyyyyymzzmz?

'//////iyyyy/y m . m n / / / s y
a

u ji

f- M IC H ,

c

/i

wy/y)y//yyy^/myy//y/m/y/^/y///My/MM4

o W IS.
M IN N .
< IO W A

J«o.
S o N. DAK.

C
°

8. DAK.
NEBR.
KANS.
D E L.
MD.

O
P
Z
<

W . VA.

m y,myAm/ym/yy/m/ym.w ///,.yy//yym n r>
/
y//////////y/my//yy(y/yyyyyyyyyy/y7%%?,yzm ,mm.jk
am

y / ' / / MyA // /y y / / /////Mmyy/JrtrA
/ M / / y y / y / y // / X
/
v
y/y/\y/////Y/yy//A?
/////yy//y//yv sw* ? /yrw' n
my y// / t/ / / / /y /m/
7/ / / /y / / \ / y/ y 7//y//x4sss{ssS{A

D . C.

<

/ / y w/ y ty yy t/yy 7myzym ', ////>
yyyy/.v / // y //y/y/y yy/
myy,
/////a
-vm .yyy////m///m/yy/yyyyyyy.Am
: Wa

' £

yzm.y//////yy/y/y)y/ym.aka.»

VA.

N.

z a , y//////)yyy////>yy/y/y//.tka vA /A A m j rtn® *'
ay
m

C.

ymy,m/M y/mmy,y/m.v////ymyy/*ysj>rm
A

O 8 . C.
D
O
GA.

y/////fy//////\y/yy/?///////ty/////yy/////A ,y yssfss*fyxm

W ///m /y/M y///m ///ym //ym yyyym yyw ssM vm

FLA.

m y7/yyy/y/yyzw /yyy/y A ;/y/y/ym w w s4rsA

O K TENN

* aa
-5 l .
<° M
Ififi
jt

fy //y /g >

7ym/ / / /y / / A/ yz yy,myK
/ / / j / / / y /jm

W ///Jy/////Jy///yyy//y//A -zm y/yyy/Jw fsJvjA

ARK.

Oec l a .
I- Z O K LA .

C J
flU

TEX.

j

rssssy
y/ / //y /mA////////WAm/Ay/y /A
y / / y y/ ,
/y /// ME

w yyyM yyyyM 'y/yyM y//M /yA yyy//m /y/m f'A

M ONT.
IO A H O

Ammyyyymymy/////my/y//y/mY.

w //M m . y/////w //ywrzk

z

W YO.

£
Z
D

C O LO .

5

A R IZ .

O

N. M EX.

yy/A/Mm a/aw / vaaa.
/
aa
Am,v/mAyAmAmAmAr/ A A
/Z ¥

UTAH
NEV.
O

W A8H .

5

OR EO .

< C A L IF .

A-

W ////Ay/////Ay////M y//Ay/////m y^t
Am .taya.v/m vm w /yy m y/.
m ?;
W/A,y////ty////y y/m
W//A
yyy
y y yyyy/A.'y ////m y///.'z m .
2 LA N D

IM P L E M E N T S A N D M A C H IN E R Y

r / / / i B U IL D IN G S
| LAND

IM P L E M E N T S

] B U IL D IN G S

AND MACHINERY

U V E STOCK

3. AVERAGE VALUE OF FARM LAND AND BUILDINGS PER
ACRE: 1850-1920.

4. VALUE OF FARM PROPERTY, BY CLASSES: 1850-1920.
8 1 L L IO N S

1
0

20

3 0

OF D O LLAR S

30__________ 4 0 _________ 5 0

DO LLARS

0
1830

L IV E S T O C K

50

4 0

70

70
7
0

0

80

60

1910

*9 0 0

^

• 890

LAN D
P M

AND

B U IL D IN G S

IM P L E M E N T S A N D M A C H IN E R Y

E Z Z 3 L IV E S T O C K

•880
•870
I8 6 0
I860




(281)

PLATE No. 248
AVERAGE VALUE OF FARM LAND AND BU ILD IN G S PER ACRE, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
(AVERAGE FOR THE UNITED STATES, *69.38.]

(282)

N

o t f ..—

T h o averages are based on figures re la tin g t o th e area In fa rm s alone, th e e o u n ty as a w h o lo b e in g shaded in accordance w i t h th o average v a lu e o f th o fa rm s ( la n d a n d b u ild in g s ) p e r acre, o v e n th o u g h o n ly a s m a ll p a r t
o f th e c o u n ty is occu p ie d b y fa rm la n d .




PLATE No. 249

1. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1850-1860.

2. PER C EN T OF IN CREASE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY, BY STA T ES: 1860-1870.




(283)

PLATE No. 250

1. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1870-1880.

2. PE R C EN T OF IN CREA SE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PRO PERTY, BY STA TES: 1880-1890.

(284)




PLATE No. 251

1. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1890-1900.

2. PE R CEN T OF IN CREA SE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PRO PERTY, BY STA TES: 1900-1910.

723°—241------19




(285)

PLATE No. 252

1. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN VALUE OF ALL FARM PROPERTY, BY STATES: 1910-1920.

2. VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, BY STA T ES: 1920.

(286)




PLATE No. 253

I. VALUE OF IM PL EM E N T S AND M ACHINERY PER ACRE OF IMPROVED LAND IN FARMS, BY STA TES: 1920.

I

I $2.50 t o 55.00
$5 .co t o $7.50
$7.50 to $10.00
|$10.00 to $12.50
I $12.50 to $15.00
B W $15.00 to $17.50
fB881 $17.50 t o $20.00
( i l l $20.00 and over.

mm

2. VALUE OF LIVE STOCK P E R ACRE OF A LL LAND IN FARMS, BY STA T ES: 1920.




(2871

PLATE No. 254
2. NUM BER OF F A R M S -P E R CEN T DISTRIBUTION BY TENURE, B Y STATES: 1910.

1. NUM BER OF F A R M S -P E R CEN T DISTRIBUTION B Y TENURE, B Y STATES: 1920,
pen

PER CENT

cent

60

80

(

0____________<0__________ 2 0

288 )



30

40

60

SO

70

80

90

100

MAINE
|

N. H.

S
Z

VT.

u

^
Z

mm

MASS.
R. 1
.
CONN.

yp

W Zm M m M &M ZM M M W M m M t

T

§3

N.J.

-

£ ,5 -*■
OHIO
H INO.
S S 'LL.

UJI

g fffffff

H MICH.
2 WI8.
MINN.
< IOWA

J « o .
S

o n

. dak.

8. DAK.
£ NEBR.
KANS.
DEL.
MD.
£

D. C.

^

1

VAW. VA.

J

N.C.

'm

g
OA.
.
ga

ym w /
a

FLA­
KY.
TENN.

|5

U

MISS.

H - l ARK‘
i f

f j ARK.

LA-

s i o k la », t e x MONT.
TEX.

'm zzm m m m m m m m

IDAHO
Z

WYO.

£

COLO.

Z
g

N. MEX.

*

ARIZ.

fffffff

UTAH
NEV.
y

£

CAU F.

CALIF.

O R tO .

1

OREO,

a

WASH.

0

WA8H.

Q

^

i
W

////6

W

W

W

u x o e a a

■

OW NERS

V ////A

M ANAGERS

ttttW U TE N A N T ®

PLATE

/. ALL FARM LAND-PER CENT DISTRIBUTION BY TENURE, B Y STATES: 1920.

No. 255

2. ALL FARM LAND-PER CENT DISTRIBUTION BY TENURE, B Y STATES: 1910.

PER CENT

PER CENT
0

10

20

30

40

50

80

70

80

BO

M a in e

s
3
o

n.

H.

VT.
MASS.
R. I.

[n o r t h

c e n t r a l Ja t l a n t ic T

CONN.

t

N. Y.
N. J.
PA.
OHIO
IND.

MICH.
WI8" "
MINN.

< IOWA.

IdO

N. DAK.

^I
► S. DAK.
K
°
j

NEBR.
KANS.
DEL.
MD.

? °-°a v‘ -

W. VA.

jE

N.

O

8. C.

0
0

c.

QA.

£ , KY.

---

is

TENN.

u,

MI8S.

ALA.

ARK.

2<

LA.
w (­
H Z OKLA.
uj O
TEX.
1

MONT.

z

WYO.

j!

COLO,

IDAHO

z

2
O
5

ARIZ.

N. MEX.

,

NEV.

UTAH

(2S9)



O

WASH.

5

OREO,

a

CALIF.

OWNERS

MANAGERS

m p

M TENANTS

100

PLATE- No. 256

(290)



PLATE No. 257

PER C EN T OF ALL FARM S OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.
[PER CENT FOR THE UNITED STATES. » . !. ]

(291)



PLATE No. 258

!. PER CENT OF ALL FARM LAND OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PE R CEN T OF A LL FARM LAND O PERATED BY TEN A N TS, BY STA T ES: 1910.

(292)




PLATE No. 259

1. PER CENT OF IMPROVED FARM LAND OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. PER C EN T OF IMPROVED FARM LAND OPERATED BY TENA NTS, BY STA TES: 1910.




(293)

PLATE No. 260
I. W HITE F A R M E R S -P E R CENT DISTRIBUTION B Y TENURE, BY 2. COLORED F A R M E R S -P E R CENT DISTRIBUTION B Y TENURE, BY
STATES: 1920.
STATES: 1920.

H -3
> 0

3
0

4
0

PER C EN T

s.
o

6
0

7
0

8
0

0
0

K
M

M A IN E
N. H.
VT.

Iff

M ASS.
R . I.

m
um

CONN.

g

W ASH.

O
<
A

OREG.

3.

C A L IF .

PER CENT DISTRIBUTION, B '
PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF FARMS IN TH E UNITED STATES, BY 4. W H ITE FARMERS IN THE SOUTH—
TENURE: 1900-1920.
TENU RE: 1880-1920.
PER CE N T
40

too

60

1920
1910
!9 0 0

30W N ERS AND MANAGERS

TENANTS

1890

. COLORED FARMERS IN THE SOUTH-PER CEN T DISTRIBUTION. [ V
TENURE: 1900-1920.

18 80

OW NERS AN D

MANAGERS

PER C E N T

1020
1910
1900
K fe ra S R a O W N E R S

(294)




AND

MANAGER8

(T E N A N T S

PLATE No. 261

1. WHITE FARMERS—PER CENT OPERATING RENTED FARMS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. COLORED FARM ERS—PER C EN T OPERATING REN T ED FARMS, BY STA TES: 1920.




(295)

PLATE No. 262

1. WHITE FAR M E RS- PER CENT OF FARM LAND OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY STATES: 1920.

2. COLORED FA R M ER S—PER CEN T OF FARM LAND OPERATED BY TENA NTS, BY STA TES: 1920.

<2 0 6 )




PLATE No. 263
2 NUMBER OF FARMS— PER CEN T DISTRIBUTION BY RACE A N D N A TIV ITY OF
B Y STATES: 1910.

PER C E N T
M A IN E
N . H.
VT.

M8 .
AS
U p N. Y.
§ § N. J.
* 5

PA.

< O H IO

a

H |N D .
$ 0 IL L .
UT
I— M IC H .




1B

m m ,w m m m i
mm mm mm
mmmm
■mm ■mm m m m m m m .m m W /M w m m r^ m
■mm w m ,W M m m .m m w /m •wm .m m m w jm m
m m W/M m m m m m m
mm
mm
W //Am m . ■mm.•m m •mm. w /m w/m . W/M,v M m m
W
m
m m.m m . ■mm m m WM> WM, w m WM, i A m
mm,
W M,

*

....

..... z n z zzz zzz izz: □
mm, mm. mm. w M m m

O T H E R C O L O H tO

N A T IV E W H IT E

M

?

F O R E IG N B O R N W H IT E

' NEGRO A N D OTH ER COLO RED

FARM ER,
(297)

1. NUMBER OF F A R M S -P E R CEN T DISTRIBUTION BY RACE AND
N ATIV ITY OF FARM ER. BY STATES: 1920.

PLATE No. 264

I. ALL FARM L A N D -P E R CENT DISTRIBUTION BY RACE AND
N ATIV ITY OF FARM ER, BY STATES: 1920.

2. FOREIGN-BORN W HITE FARMERS IN THE UNITED STATES, BY
COUNTRY OF BIRTH : 1920 AND 1910.

W EST S O U T H I Ea s t SO UTH 1
CENTRAL
CENTRAL

^

S O U T H A T I A N T IO
S O U T H A T L A N T IC

I

W EST
NORTH C E N TR A L

I

EAST
| M IO O L E I
N O R T H C E N T R A L A T L A N T IC

tN nLAN O
NEW ENGLANO

THOUSANDS

3.

W HITE FARM TENANTS A N D OWNERS IN THE SOUTH, BY AGE: 1920

um xw r t

4.

COLORED FARM TENANTS AND OWNERS IN THE SOUTH,
BY AGE: 1920.

NEGRO
O T H E R C O LO R E O

5.

(298)




FARM TENANTS AND OWNERS IN THE UNITED STATES, BY AGE: 192a

PLATE No. 255




(290)

PER CENT OF ALL FARMS OPERATED BY COLORED FARMERS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

PLATE No. 266

1. PER CENT OF ALL FARM LAND OPERATED BY COLORED FARMERS, BY STATES: 1920.
SO UTHERN STATES O N LY .

2. PER CENT OF ALL FARM LAND OPERATED BY COLORED FARMERS, BY STATES: 1910.
SO UTHERN STATES O N LY .

(300)




PLATE No. 267

1. PER CENT OF IMPROVED FARM LAND OPERATED BY COLORED FARMERS, BY STATES: 1920.
SO UTHER N STATES O N LY .

2. PER CENT OF IMPROVED FARM LAND OPERATED BY COLORED FARMERS, BY STATES: 1910.
SO UTHERN STATES O N LY .

723°—24t




-20

(301)

PLATE No. 263

1. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF OWNER-OPERATED FARMS ACCORDING 2. RATIO OF MORTGAGE DEBT TO VALUE OF MORTGAGED FARMS, BY
TO MORTGAGE STATUS, BY STATES: 1920.
STATES: 192a
PER C EN T

M A IN E

mm.

N. H.

VT.
MASS.

M M .

R. L
CONN.

u p N. Y.

:

Q < N. J.

$ S .U .

tail

»- M IC H .

J «o .
MJ
ta
S o n . dak.
*x
I - 8. D A K .
cc
°

NEBR.

|

1

6 0 U T H A T L A N T IC

1

KANS.

1

NORTH CENTRAL

M IN N .
< IO W A

i

5 W I 8.

1

CE

mm,
V/iW
ZM
A
m m .W////W/M
W/M.
WM w //M m
mm.
W/ WM,
mm
w m m m m m WWMWM. wm
m
W /M
W/M w /m /M tm w/MM//m , mm.mmtomI
Mw/Mmm.w /M/m m W /M ZH JJB
w/ m
W
’
w /m .W MfyW M w m M tm , W/M,
w /M m m . wm% .wm
mw
w ////M m , ' m’ m m
m m

i

IN O .

1

t

.......... ........j......

1

< O H IO

K

! ......" L

..:.......i.......... l .......... ........... i .......- i n . —

I
1
...

PA.

mm,

1

mm,
M M W M fyw m
W M W /M mm
W //M //M /M W /M , "~Fr,|
wm W M
mm.m m M //M M 7A ,mm
m m mm.
W/M
w/m w//M/w/Jmm.___
W /M mm
a
W /M
v/
mm
mm'mmw/M/MWw W/w M wm
‘
V/WA
/
B l

Li

n
i

WM,
_ ...

w /M p/m
......" :

W A 8H.
OREO .

y M m m rn m .
M

CAUF.

FREE FRO M M O R TG AG E

I M ORTGAGED

E Q U IT Y

3. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF OWNER-OPERATED FARMS IN TH
ACCORDING TO MORTGAGE STATUS: 1890-1920.

UNKNOW N

(302)




| MORTGAGED

M ORTGAGE D EBT

’

PLATE No. 269

MORTGAGE DEBT ON OWNER-OPERATED FARMS, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1910.

IO W A
W IS C O N S IN
M in n e s o t a
C A L IF O R N I A
M I 8S O U R I
IL L IN O I S
TEXAS
NEBRASKA
NEW YORK
M ic h ig a n
O h io
KANSA8
NORTH D AKO TA
IN D I A N A
SO UTH D A K O T A
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
M ONTANA
O K LAH O M A
ID A H O
KENTUCKY
C O LO RA D O
W a s h in g t o n
OREG ON
Tennessee
V I R G IN IA
ARKANSAS
G E O R G IA
N O R T H C A R O L IN A
M IS S IS S IP P I
ALABAM A
M AR YLAN D
S O U T H C A R O L IN A
N EW JERSEY
UTAH
VERM ONT
M ASSACHUSETTS
L O U I S IA N A
M a in e
C O N N E C T IC U T
A R IZ O N A
W Y O M IN G

FLORIDA
W E S T V IR G IN IA
N E W M E X IC O
N E W H A M P S H IR E
NEVADA
Delaw ar e
Rh o d e i s l a n d




(303)

PLATE No. 270

1. FARM EXPENDITURES FOR LABOR, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
M ILLIO NS OF DOLCAR8
CA LIFOR NIA
TEXAS
ILLINOIS
IOWA
KANSAS
NEW YORK
M INNESOTA
W ISCON SIN
OHIO
NEBRASKA
PE NN SYLVANIA
OKLAHOMA
M ISSOURI
NORTH DAKOTA

2. FARM EXPENDITURES FOR FEED, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1909.

WASHINGTON
IN DIAN A

MILLION8 OF DOLLARS

o______________ a3

M IC H IGA N
NEW YORK

SOUTH DA KOTA

IOWA

COLORADO

ILLINOIS

LOUISIANA

TEXAS
M ONTANA
MISSOURI
OREGON
NEBRA8KA
V IR G IN IA
KANSAS

n
.

GEORGIA
PENNSYLVANIA
IDAHO

CALIFORNIA

KENTUCKY

INDIANA

N E W JE R SE Y

OHIO

M ARYLAND

OKLAHOMA

M A S SA C H U S E TTS

WISCONSIN

80 U T H CARO LIN A

MINNESOTA

1

A R K A N SA S

MICHIGAN

1

CONNECTICUT

WASHINGTON
■MA88ACHU8ETT8

■

NORTH CA RO LIN A
TENN ESSEE

MONTANA
COLORADO

!

FLOR ID A

ARKAN8A8

M AINE
W Y O M IN G
UTAH
ARIZONA
A LABAM A
V E RM ONT
M ISS IS SIP P I
NEW M E X IC O
NEVADA
W E S T V IR G IN IA
NEW H AM PSH IR E
DE LA W AR E
R H O p g ISLAND

SOUTH DAKOTA

p !■

KENTUCKY
MAINE
NEW JER8EY
OREGON

W
m
w
¥
w

VIRGINIA
NORTH DAKOTA
NORTH CAROLINA
LOUISIANA
CONNECTICUT

9

■
S

TENNESSEE

I

VERMONT
IDAHO
MISSISSIPPI
GEORGIA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
M ARYLAND
WYOMING
ALABAMA
SOUTH CAROLINA
WEST VIRGINIA
NEW MEXICO
FLORIDA
UTAH
RHODE ISLAND
ARIZONA
DELAWARE
NEVADA

(304)







PLATE No. 271

1. PER CENT OF ALL FARMS REPORTING TELEPHONES, BY STATES: 1920.

2. SALES AND PURCHASES BY FARMERS THROUGH COOPERATIVE ORGANIZATIONS,
20 LEADING STATES: 1919.

(305)

PLATE No. I l l

(30fi)




P L A T E No. 273

C {0 7 )




PLATE No. 274

( 308)




u;os)

PLATE




No. 275

PLATE No. 276

(3 10 )




PLATE No. 277

2. WOOL PRODUCED, 16 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.

I. EGGS PRODUCED ON FARMS, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
M IL L IO N S OF DOZENS
40

60

_______ 80

M IL L IO N S O F P O U N D S

i *o

IOWA
M I8 8 0 U R I
ILL IN O IS
OHIO

Indiana
K ansas
Pe n n s y l v a n ia
'Te x a s
C A L IF O R N IA
new york

M in n e s o t a
M ic h ig a n
W is c o n s in
Nebraska
Tennessee
Ok l a h o m a
Kentucky
V ir g

in ia

south

DAKOTA

Ar k a n s a s
N O R T H C A R O L IN A

M is s is s ip p i
Al a b a m a

Georgia
w est

V ir

g in ia

3. BUTTER MADE ON FARMS AND IN FACTORIES: 1879-1919.

Wa s h in g t o n
No r th Da k o t a

H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S O F P O U N D S

Ma r y la n d
Or e g o n

(010

8

8

10

I!

1000
C O LO RAD O

1800

n ew jer se y

(889

Lo u is ia n a
S O U T H C A R O L IN A

1870
IN

F A C T O R IE S

Mo n tan a
M a in e
Massachusetts
io a h o

t^ orid a

C o n n e c t ic u t
otah

Ve r m o n t
N E W H A M P S H IR E
o elaw ar e

Wy o m i n g
new

M e x ic o

A r iz o n a
* *

o d e is l a n d

Ne v a d a




(311)

PLATE No. 278

1. CALVES RAISED ON FARMS, BY STATES: 1919.

1 PIGS RAISED ON FARMS, BY STATES: 1919.

HUNDREDS OF TM 0U8AN08

4.

•

S

10

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS

12

TEXA8

IOWA

IOW A

ILL IN O IS

W ISCO NSIN

IN D IA N A

M IN N ES O TA

MISSOURI

IL L IN O I8

OHIO

KANSAS

NEBRASKA

NEBRASKA

MINNESOTA

MISSOURI

WISCONSIN

NEW YORK

SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNES8EE

OHIO

KANSAS

M IC H IG A N

KEN TUCK Y

O KLA HO M A

TEXAS

IN D IA N A
SOUTH D A K O TA
P E N N S Y L V A N IA
C A L IF O R N IA

GEORGIA
M IC H IG A N
PEN NSYLVANIA
NORTH CAROLINA

COLORADO

V IR G IN IA

NORTH D A K O TA
M I3 S I8 8 IP P I

OKLAHOMA
ALABAM A

TENNESSEE

M ISSISSIPPI

M O N TA N A

ARKANSAS

K E N TU C K Y

N e w YORK

A RK A N 8A S

CALIFO RN IA

A LA B A M A

NORTH DAKOTA

GEORGIA

SOUTH CAROLINA

V IR G IN IA

LOUISIANA

NEW M E X IC O

FLORIDA

W YO M ING

COLORADO

OREGON

WEST V IR G IN IA

W ASHING TO N

M A R Y LAN D

IDAHO
LO U IS IA N A

WASHINGTON
IDAHO

NORTH C A R O L IN A

OREGON

WEST V IR G IN IA

MONTANA
NEW JERSEY

VERMO NT

M A IN E

UTA H

MASSACHUSETTS

ARIZONA
SOUTH C A R O L IN A

UTAH
VERMONT

M A IN E

WYOMING

M AR YLAND

NEW M EXIC O

FLO R ID A

CONNECTICUT

NEVADA

NEW HAMPSHIRE

N E W JERSEY

DELAWARE

b O N N E C T IC U T

ARIZONA

M AS SA CH USE TTS
N E W H A M P S H IR E
DELAW AR E
RHODE ISLAND

(312)




NE V AD A
RHODE ISLANO

20

4Q

60




PLATE No. 279

1. VALUE OF ALL FARM CROPS, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
MILLIONS OP DOLLARS
TEXAS.
IOWA
ILLINOI8 ,
OHIO
CALIFORNIA
KANSAS
MISSOURI
OKLAHOMA
GEORGIA
NEBRASKA
MINNESOTA
NORTH CARO
INDIANA
WISCONSIN
SOUTH CARO
NEW YORK
PENNSYLVAN
MICHIGAN
KENTUCKY
ARKANSA8
MISSISSIPPI
TENNESSEE

VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
LOUISIANA
COLORADO
OREGON
IDAHO
MARYLAND
MAINE
WEST VIRGIf
NEW JERSEY
FLORIDA
MONTANA
UTAH
MA8SACHUE
VERMONT
CONNECTIC
ARIZONA
NEW MEXICO
WYOMING
NEW HAMPSH
DELAWARE
NEVADA

2. ALL FARM CR OPS-VALUE, BY STATES: 1909.

(313)

PLATE No. 280

AVERAGE VALUE OF ALL FARM CROPS PER FARM, BY STATES: 1919 2. AVERAGE VALUE PER ACRE OF CROPS WITH ACREAGE REPORTS,
BY STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
AND 1909.
TH OUSANDS OF DOLLARS

MAINE

M AINE

NEW H AM PSH IR E

NEW H AM PSH IRE

VERM ONT

VERMONT

M A SSA C H U SE TTS

M ASSA C H U SE TTS

RHODE ISLAND

RHODE ISLAND

CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT

MIDDLE ATLANTA
NEW YO RK

M ID D L E" A T LA N T IC
NEW YORK

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

PENN SYLVANIA

PE NN SYLVANIA

OHIO

OHIO

E AST Ni
INDIAN A

INDIANA

ILLINOIS

ILLINOIS

M ICH IGAN

M ICH IGAN

WISCON SIN

W ISCONSIN

M INNESOTA

M INNESOTA

IOWA

, IOWA

MISSOURI

MISSOURI

NORTH DAKOTA

NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTH DA KOTA

SOUTH DAKOTA

NEBRASKA

NEBRASKA

KANSAS

KANSAS

DELAWARE

DELAW ARE

M AR YLA N D

M ARYLAND

D I8T . OF COLUMBIA

D IST OF COLUMBIA

V IR GINIA

VIRGINIA

W EST V IR GINIA

WEST V IR GINIA

NORTH CARO LIN A

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CARO LIN A

SOUTH CAROLINA

GEORGIA

GEORGIA

FLORIDA

Fl o r id a

K E NTUCKY
TENN ESSEE
ALABAM A
M is s is s ip p i'

M ISSISSIPPI

A R K A N SA S

A R K ANSAS

LOUISIANA

LOUISIANA

OKLAHOMA

OKLAHOMA

TE X A S

TE XA S

M ONTANA
IDAHO
W YOM ING
COLORADO
NEW M EX IC O
ARIZONA
UTAH
NEVADA

PACIFIj
WASHINGTON

PACIFI
W ASHINGTON

OREGON

OREGON

CALIFORNIA

CA LIFOR NIA

(314)




PLATE No. 281

I. PRODUCTION OF WHEAT IN THE UNITED STATES: 1849-1919.

2. PRODUCTION OF CORN IN THE UNITED STATES: 1849-1919.
H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S OF B U S H E L S

HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF,BUSHELS

0

2

4

8

8

10

0

5

10

16

20

26

1010
1000

1800
1880
1870
I8 6 0
I860
1840

3. PRODUCTION OF WHEAT, 15 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
K
ansas

0

25

60

M IL L I0 N 8 OF BUSHELS
75
100

4. PRODUCTION OF CORN, 20 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
M ILL IO N S OF BUSH ELS

125

ISO

0

100

200

300

400

IOWA

'U -IN O I8

ILLINOIS

O
klahoma

NEBRASKA

M is s o u r i

INDIAN A

* ° « T H DA KOTA

OHIO

Oh i o

M ISSOURI

Ne b r a s k a

TEXAS

■ d ia n a
n

M INNESOTA

Wa s h i n g t o n

K E NTUCKY

Min n e s o t a

TE NN ESSEE

Texas

SOUTH DAKOTA

* °U T h o a k o t a

p ftN N SY LV A N IA

Pe n n s y l v a n i a

K A N SA8

io w a

OKLAHOMA

M ic h ig a n

GEORGIA
M IC H IGA N
WISCON SIN

5. PRODUCTION OF OATS IN THE UNITED STATES: 1849-1919.
H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S OF B U S H E L S

'

2

4

ALABAM A
V IR GIN IA
NORTH CARO LIN A

8

6. PRODUCTION OF BUCKWHEAT, 5 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
'8 7 9

M ILL IO N S OF B USH ELS

'8 8 9

0

1

2

3

4

PE N N SY L V A N IA

1869

>849

NEW YO RK
OHIO

7. PRODUCTION OF OATS, 15 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.

W E S T V IR G IN IA
M IC H IG A N

M ILL IO N S OF B USH ELS
•OWA

8. PRODUCTION OF BARLEY, 10 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.

ILLINOIS
M in n e s o t a
W is c o n s in
Te x a s
Ne b r a s k a
IN DIAN A
SOUTH O A K O T A
Oh i o
Ok l a h o m a
M is s o u r i
M ic h ig a n
Ka n s a s
NORTH D A K O T A
P E N N SY L V A N IA




(335)

PLATE No. 282

I. PRODUCTION OF POTATOES, 20 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
M IL L IO N S O S 8 U S H E L 8

2. PRODUCTION OF SWEET POTATOES, 15 LEADING STATES: 1919
AND 1909.
M ILL IO N 8 OF B USH ELS

N E W Y O RK
M IN N E S O TA

GEORGIA

W ISC O N SIN

A LABAM A

M AINE

NORTH C A RO LIN A

M IC H IG A N

M I8SI8SIPP 4

P E N N SY L V A N IA

V IR GINIA

V IR G IN IA

TEXA8

N E W JE R SE Y

SOUTH C A RO LIN A i

C O LO RA D O

LO UISIANA

C A L IF O R N IA

TE NN ESSEE

OH IO

A R K A N SA S

IDAHO

FLORIDA

W A S H IN G T O N

OKLAHOMA
NEW JE R SE Y

M ARYLAN D

DELAW ARE

NORTH DAKOT

M ARYLAND

ILLINOIS
N EBRASKA
IOWA
M ISSOU R I
OREGON

3. PRODUCTION OF RYE, 10 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909. 4. PRODUCTION OF TOBACCO, 15 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.
M IL L IO N S

OF BU SH ELS
KENTUCKY
NORTH C A RO LIN A
TE NN ESSEE
V IR G IN IA
SOUTH CA RO LIN A
OHIO
PE N N SYL VA N IA
W ISCON SIN
CON N E C TIC U T
IN DIAN A
M A R YL A N D
M A S SA C H U S E TTS
GEORGIA

5. VALUE OF VEGETABLES RAISED FOR SALE, 12 LEADING STATES: 1919.

W E ST V IR G IN IA
FLORIDA

M ILLIO NS OF DOLLARS

5

C A LIF O R N IA

1
0

15

20

25

NEW YO RK
FLORIDA
NEW JE R SE Y
OH IO

7. PRODUCTION OF COTTON, 15 LEADING STATES: 1919 AND 1909.

M ARYLAND
P E N N SY L V A N IA
M A S SA C H U S E T T S

H U N D R E D S OF T H O U 8A .4D 8 OF BALES

TEXAS
M IC H IGA N

TEXAS

ILLIN OIS
GEORGIA

V IR G IN IA

SOUTH C A R O LIN A

6. PRODUCTION OF COTTON IN THE UNITED STATES: 1849-1919.

OKLAHOM A
M ISS IS SIPP I
A R K A N 8A S

M IL L IO N S OF B A L E S

1919

O

2

4

6

8

10

12

NORTH C A R O LIN A
A LA B AM A

1 909

TE N N ESSE E

1899

LO U ISIA N A

1889

M ISSOURI

1879

AR IZON A

1869

C A LIF O R N IA

1869

V IR G IN IA

1 84 9

FLORIDA

(316)




PLATE No. 283




PLATE No. 284

(

318)




(C.IK)

P L A T E No. 285




PLATE No. 286

(

320)




P LA TE

I. P E R C E N T O E A L E F A R M S O P E R A T E D B Y T E N A N T S , B Y G E O G R A P H IC D IV IS IO N S : 1880-1920.
U N IT E D S T A T E S

NEW E N G L A N D

PER C E N T
0

10

20

30

PER C E N T
40

60

0

10

20

30

40

60

M ID D L E A T L A N T IC
PE R C E N T

0

10

20

30

40

60

19?0

HA Y STATES

1910
1900
1990
1880




I ii
i

B

I t i.

E

ii,

Ei

lli*
r
t

«» ©
3 2 S+
©
© + >© 1 © ©•
I I T I I© i7 1
< i T i i,
I
©© © ©©
©* ©©
“ ©©©

i5 2©

, o

iu o
O o
<<
r

COTTON STATES

EAST SO UTH C E N TR AL

W EST SO U TH C E N TR A L

PER CENT

PE R C E N T
0

10

20

No.

2. P E R C E N T O F T E N A N C Y I N E A C H A G E G RO U P, FOR S E L E C T E D S T A T E S : 1920.

30____ 40______60

1920

WESTERN STATES

|

■ _________ __

L
lli

|

t
S S

UTAH

M ONT.

N. M EX,

\

1
II
l

W ASH.

OREO .

2 2 +

n

© © © © ©
ei
© ©

t

l

f

n© © S

i

5
+
. i l i 1 ©
1 © © © © ©
O 1 IC

■
1. |
Ill Ii
?H 3
r
*

■

f

60
40T

■

i l l

1 © © © © ©
m © ©

1
l._ l l . __
111 rm nun

3

12 «
2
+
7 1 i 1 i ©
* © © © © ©
« « ♦ ©

8 ? f ? ? s
1 © © © © ©
C « C ©
4

33

©
© © +
7 1 T ,| i JO
■ © © © © ©
o © ©

e
*

30
20
10
AG E
GROUP

CAUF.

2S7

PLATE No. 288

. PER CENT OF IMPROVED LAND IN FARMS OPERATED BY TENANTS, OWNERS, AND MANAGERS, FOR SELECTED STATES: 1920.
PER C E N T
0.

20

40

60

80

100

////////////////////////////////////A
IOW A

v''...... :
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
IN D IA N A

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
N O R T H D A K O TA

£

ZZZZZZZZZ/ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZs
P E N N S Y L V A N IA

szzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
KANSAS

'ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz
G E O R G IA

_____ L
___ _L ____ L
_____
C A L IF O R N IA

M
I

T

ZZZZZZZZZZZ/ZZZZZZZZs
V IR G IN IA

U TAH

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

TE X A S

a

m
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ/ 1
NEW ENGLAND

E

^ i l TENANTS

O W N ER S

VZ//////A M A N A G E R S

2. RELATION BETWEEN QUALITY OF SOIL AND PER CENT OF TENANCY: MONROE, NORTHAMPTON, LEHIGH, AND CARBON COUNTIES, PAS O IL S

H

(322)




TENANCY

I

PLATE No. 289

I. PER CENT OF FARMS OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY COUNTIES: 1920.

f

• f Lees than 10 per cent .
10 t o 20 p er oent.
20 t o 30 per cent.
lilllllllW 30 t o 40 per oent.
P # • :! 40 t o 60 per oent.
%■
fo w S l 50 t o 60 p er cent.
Kt«t*3 60 t o 70 per cent.
& % £ 7 0 t o 80 per cent.
M H 6 0 t o 00 per cent.
H B 0 0 per cen t and over.

2. PER CENT OF FARMS OPERATED BY TENANTS, BY COUNTIES: 1880.
[A re a s le ft b la n k on th e m a p re p re s e n t c o u n tie s w h ic h h a d less th a n 100 fa rm s in 1880.]

^

-I Lem than 10 per cent.
10 t o 20 per cent.
20 t o 30 per oent.

IPJUI 30 t o 40 per oent.
b
40 t o 50 per oent.
f'
60 t o 60 per oent.
| 60 t o 70 per cent.
1 70 t o 80 per cent.
| 80 t o 90 per cent.
1 90 per cent and over.




(323)

PLATE No. 290

I. NUMBER AND PER CENT OF TENANTS AND OWNERS, BY AGE, FOR THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST: 1920.
[Managers are included with owners.]

TH E NORTH
N U M B E R OP T E N A N T S

N U M B E R OP O W N E R S
THO U SAN DS

PER C E N T

AG E GROUP
GOO
UNDER

25

26

TO

34

35

TO

44

45

TO

54

55

TO

64

65 A N D OVER

T H E SO U TH
UNDER

26

25

TO

34

35

TO

44

45

TO

54

65

TO

64

66' A N D O VER

THE
UNDER
25

TO

36

TO

34
44

46

TO

64

65

TO

W EST

TB"

26

64

7 7 J7 2

TENANTS
OW NERS A N D
MANAGERS

65 A N D O V E R

2. AVERAGE VALUE OF FARM PROPERTY PER FARM, AND PER CENT REPRESENTED BY LAND,
FOR OWNERS AND TENANTS IN SELECTED STATES: 1920.
V A LU E

OF

ALL

PROPERTY

PER FARM

PER CENT OF TOTAL REPRESENTED BY LANO
PER CENT
40

PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
MISSISSIPPI
| OWNERS

(324)




Y //////A

TENANTS

60

00

PLATE No. 291

1. PER CENT OF TENANCY IN EACH AGE GROUP, FOR THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST:
1890 TO 1920.
'T J J A , 1910

I 1920

o.

US D

OO
<H
o

UND ER
25

YEARS

25
TO
34

TO

35

45
TO

44

54

55
AND
O VER

frfrfrsaofl 1900

UND ER
25
YEARS

25
TO
34

tY / / / / A I®
9®

35
TO
44

45
TO
54

55

Q.
U D
i

AND
O VER

O o
< tr
o

2. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF VALUE OF LIVE STOCK, BY CLASSES, AND AVERAGE VALUE
PER FARM, FOR OWNERS AND TENANTS, IN SELECTED STATES: 1920.




(325)

PLATE No. 292
I. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF FARMS AND FARM ACREAGE, BY TENURE, FOR THE NORTH,
SOUTH, AND WEST: 1920.
l l l l l l l l OWNERS |%^%|PART OWNERS

|§ § |M A N A G E R 8 fc p S ICASH TENANTS B B J 8HARE TENANTS

PER CENT OPERATED B Y OWNERS AND MANAGERS

90

80

70

60

B
O

40

30

20

PER CENT OPERATED B Y TENANTS

10

10

r 11 i i

20

i r i r i

30

40

60

SO

70

60

80

T H E U N IT E D STATES

NUMBER OF FARMS 6.448.'343 I I

llllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllll^ /^
LANPIN FARMS 95&,8ga,7l5 ACRES
IMPROVED LAND 503.078.007 ACRE8
ES

I

w m m g zzh k
W
TH E NORTH
NUMBER OF FARMS ;2.i76 sU oS I

Illllllllim jlllllllllllS Illlllllllllllll^ :/'//
|

1 UANP IN PARM9 432.27I.06I ACRES

| f

291,865.982 ACRES!
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll^^K/y
I I MPROVED LAND

T H E WEST
4UMBEft OF FARMS )4fl

TH E SOUTH (W H ITE )

* i i » \t i i i I I

NUMBER OF FARMS 2.083.760

iiiiiMiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimi^^
|
LAND IN FARM8 308.803.S37 ACRES
IMPROVED LAND 120.885.884 ACRES I I

'

u r n ............
T H E SOUTH (COLORED)

|LAND IN FARMS 41.318,486 ACRES!

I I I

| | I IM^ROVEO LAND 2 7 ,7 4 3 !T 6 ^ 0 R E ^ ^ n

1
2. PER CENT OF TOTAL VALUE OF FARM PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY EACH CLASS,
FOR OWNERS AND TENANTS, IN THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST: 1920.
PER CENT

UNITED STATE8
0
OWNERS

IQ

20

80

40

50

SO

70

80

'00

TENANTS
THE NORTH

THE WEST

THE SOUTH (W H IT E )
OWNERS
TENANTS
THE SOUTH (.COLORED)
OWNERS

R & g & fl LAND

(326)




tS S J jIMPLEMENTS AND MACHINERY

g g g g jB U IL D IN G S

—1— 1 LIVE STOCK

100

PLATE No. 293

1. PE R CEN T OF TENANTS IN EACH LABOR-INCOME GROUP, YAZOO-MISSISSIPPI DELTA:
1913.
PER

PER

CA8H R E N T E R S

SHARE R E N TER S

SHARE CROPPERS

CEN T

CENT

30

30

26

26

20

20

16

16

1

10

e

■1

« t««»
INCOME

• •

}

g

in

t
E

o

-

«

d i iB
N

111.
A

a

® o

.
E

_

l

l

i

S

S

i

l

S

l l l i . i
• o a a a o a s ®
a a a v a a a a c i
® — c* « . t <o ® t- ca a

e

?

l

•
§

i

111
,|

III

5 M M N « « i
-

l

*

>

>

<

1

'

'

|

10

1,.

1

l l l l l i
g g g g g g g g g

.

aissssssssi-• <

1

2

,

l

1

l

1

“

o

f

i

l

l

1
l

1

l
UUN>.
,«C0MC

I

I

I

g

S

S

ft

I

l

”

< »“ " »

2. RETURN ON LANDLORD’S INVESTMENT, IN RELATION TO TENANT’ S LABOR INCOME,
YAZOO-MISSISSIPPI DELTA: 1913.




t

LABOR

£

I NCOME

tL

oo^..

.
8

8 «
S
«
|

I I

3
<a
I

I

O ° I § I §

Sea
Cl 1 ' 1 ' w
5 • S 8 8 I -

*-* 8 8 ® 8 +
8 3 £
a
o*

LABOR

£

INCOME

q

|-

I’ I

I

I

g

s ° i i § i -

(327)

D epartm ent of C om m erce
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

A P P R O X IM A T E L O C A T IO N A N D A R E A O F O P E R A T IN G

D R A IN A G E

E N T E R P R IS E S :

1920

PLATE No. 294

(a ■
'
T .
|

4

f J v t jw J

f!T

r 4

y/LfW
A.

j4,in

,ra« n g d r a in a g e e n te rp ris e s s h o w n in red




S ' *1*

wo

U U T & IW U

•oo Mile*

PLATE No. 295

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




ARKANSAS.

(329)

PLATE No. 296

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
C A L IF O R N IA .

(330)







APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
COLORADO.

(3 3 1 )

PLATE No. 297

PLATE No. 298

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES:1 1920.
FLO R ID A .

(3 3 2 )




PLATE No. 299

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
G E O R G IA .

7 2 3 ° — 2 4 t -------22




(3 3 3 )

PLATE No. 300

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
ID A H O .

(334)




PLATE No. 301

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




I L L IN O I S .

(335)

PLATE No. 302

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
IN D IA N A .

(.336)




PLATE No. 303




IO W A .

(337)

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.

PLATE No. 304

<33S)




APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
KANSAS.

PLATE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
KENTUCKY.

I339 >



No. 305

PLATE No. 306

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
L O U IS IA N A .

( 340)




PLATE No. 307

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




M IC H IG A N .

(3 41 )

PLATE No. 308

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
M IN N E S O T A .

(342)




PLATE No. 309

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




M I S S IS S IP P I.

~r

j \
k

toiiijp

r~

r l z i: i ! /i

( 8 4 .'! I

PLATE No. 310

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
M IS S O U R I.

(3 4 4 )







APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
MONTANA.

(345

PLATE No. 311

PLATE No. 312

<46)
3



APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
NEBRASKA.




PLATE No. 313

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
NORTH

C A R O L IN A .

PLATE No. 314

(348)



APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
NORTH

DAKOTA.

PLATE No. 315

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
O H IO .
...

—

-

=047"

r
*

.i*

"4T

7 2 3 ° - 24'!'




-2.3

(3 4 0 )

PLATE No. 316

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
SOUTH
(350)




C A R O L IN A .

PLATE No. 317

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
SOUTH

(3 5 1 )




DAKOTA.

PLATE No. 318

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.

,NO !*»**'

TEXAS.

(3 5 2 )




PLATE No. 319

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




UTAH.

(35.'{)

PLATE No. 320

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
W A S H IN G T O N .
(35 4 )




PLATE

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.




W IS C O N S I N .

(3 5 5 )

No. 321

PLATE No. 322

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND AREA OF OPERATING DRAINAGE ENTERPRISES: 1920.
W Y O M IN G .

(356)




D

of C om m erce
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

epartm ent

4 areas sh ow n in red



APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED AREAS: 1920

PLATE NO. 323

ftnuiron.

K
JktfK
V

A

iiiT >
lii

"'A

Co

,

\ jnbtn
a

|

M
uj>'*ti‘r + •
r jr
tittutn*'**

\„rl,'n
?xu
t

fo I S
1
pV
a*

■

.Ato/U
otm
I.nti**r

•Alton
It/lermn
•

■

Kntpt',

n s

-v

"U u
a

f., Atf^'
.Ulan*1
A ,i

/'.t.'/.L f

<Yl-tttbury

N i'«u At
^ i ni).

S c a le

u il

» t& o oo

too_____aoo

*oo

aoo_________ooo M ilp s




PLATE No. 324

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
A R IZ O N A .

(357)

PLATE No. 325

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
ARKANSAS.

( 358)







PLATE No. 326

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
C A L IF O R N IA .

(359)

PLATE No. 327

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
C O LO R AD O .

(360)







PLATE No. 328

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
ID A H O .

(361)

PLATE No. 329

(362)



APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
KANSAS.




PLATE No. 330

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
L O U IS IA N A .

(363)

PLATE No. 331

(3&1)



APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
M ONTANA.

PLATE

-i
i;
ic

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
NEBRASKA.

(<J9«)

I
£




No. 332

PLATE No. 333

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
NEVADA.

(366)







PLATE No. 334

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
NEW

M E X IC O .

(367)

PLATE No. 335

(368)




APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
NORTH

DAKOTA.

PLATE

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EX TEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.

■ i
o'.n;

OREGON.




No. 336

PLATE No. 337

APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
(370)




SOUTH

DAKOTA.




PLATE No. 338

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
TEXAS.

f .3711

PLATE No. 339

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
UTAH.

(372)




PLATE No. 340




APPROXIM ATE LOCATION AND EXTEN T OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
W A S H IN G T O N .

PLATE No. 341

APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IRRIGATED LAND: 1920.
W Y O M IN G .

(374)







MANUFACTURES
PLATES 342-350

MANUFACTURES.
P late
N o.

342

343
344
345
346

T itle .

Value of all manufactured products and proportional
value for each geographic division: 1919, 1914, 1909,
1904, and 1899.
Value of products of manufacturing industries, by states:
1919 and 1914.
Value added by manufacture, by states: 1919 and 1914.
Value of all manufactured products and proportional
value for each group: 1919,1914, 1909, 1904, and 1899.
Value of products for groups of industries: 1919, 1914,
and 1909.
(376)




P late
N o.

347
348

T itle .

Value of products for leading industries: 1919 and 1914­
Average number of wage earners, bv states: 1919 and
1914.
"
349 Average number of wage earners b y industries e m p l o y i n g
over 40,000 wage earners: 1919 and 1914.
1. Value of manufactured products, by states: 191®
(map).
350 ■
2. Per cent of increase in population, 1910-1920, a n d in
.
manufactures, 1909-1919.

PLATE No. 342

VALUE OF ALL MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS AND PROPORTIONAL VALUE FOR EACH GEOGRAPHIC DIVISION:
1919, 1914, 1909. 1904, AND 1899.




1919

(.377)

PLATE No. 343

VALUE OF PRODUCTS OF MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1914.
M IL L IO N S OF DOLLARS

<37S)




PLATE No. 344-

VALUE ADDED BY MANUFACTURE, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1914.
M IL L IO N S OF DOLLARS
1.600
NEW YO R K
P E N N S Y L V A N IA

4.000

2.600

'/////////////
/////////////A

O H IO

2.000

V// S /// // ////S/// //////S////////////
S/S S//S/S//// ///S////// /////////////

///ssssss///jv/s//y////?/s///sS'

IL L IN O IS

sSS//S///SS//S////S///////SSS/SS/SSS//

M A SS A C H U S E TTS

!

M IC H IG A N
N E W JE R S E Y
C A L IF O R N IA
IN D IA N A
W IS C O N S IN
C O N N E C T IC U T
M ISSO U R I
N O R T H C A R O L IN A
W A S H IN G T O N
M IN N E S O T A
R H O D E IS L A N D
M ARYLAND
TEX AS
V IR G IN IA
G E O R G IA
L O U IS IA N A
IOW A
TEN N ESSEE
M A IN E
W E S T V IR G IN IA
ALA B A M A
N E W H A M P S H IR E
K AN S AS
O R EG O N
K E N TU C K Y
S O U T H C A R O L IN A
F L O R ID A
NEBRASKA
MISSISSIPPI

1919
(9 1 4

COLORADO
ARKANSAS
O KLAHO M A
D ELAW AR E
VERM ONT
U TAH
M O N TA N A
W Y O M IN G
D I S T . O F C O L U M B IA
ID A H O
A R IZ O N A
8 0 U TH D A K O TA
N O R TH D AK O TA
N E W M E X IC O
NEVADA




( 379 )

PLATE No. 345

VALUE OF ALL MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS AND PROPORTIONAL VALUE FOR EACH GROUP:
1919, 1914, 1909, 1904, AND 1899.




1919

1914

1909

1899

PLATE No. 346

VALUE OF PRODUCTS FOR CROUPS OF INDUSTRIES: 1919, 1914, AND 1909.
H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S O F D O L L A R S

0

20

40

60

80

100

10
2

FOOD AN D
K IN D R E D P R O D U C TS

IR O N A N D S T E E L
A N D T H E IR PR O D U C TS

T E X T IL E S
A N D T H E IR P R O D U C TS

M IS C E L L A N E O U S
IN D U S T R IE S

C H E M IC A L S
A N D A L L IE D PR O D U C TS

V E H IC L E S F O R L A N D
T R A N S P O R T A T IO N

L U M B E R A N D IT S
REM AN UFACTU RES

PAPER AND
P R I N T IN G

M ETALS O TH ER TH AN
IR O N A N D S T E E L

L E A T H E R A N D ITS
F IN IS H E D PR O D U C T S

R A IL R O A D
R E P A IR S H O P 8

STON E. CLAY . AN O
GLASS P R O D U C T S

TOBACCO
M AN U FACTU RES

L IQ U O R S A N D
BEVERAGES

23*—24f----- 25




(381)

PLATE No. 347

VALUE OF PRODUCTS FOR LEADING INDUSTRIES: 1919 AND 1914.
M IL L IO N S O F D O L L A R 8

o
SLAUG HTERING . M E A T PACKING

AUTO M O BILES
FOUNDRY A N D MACHINE-SHOPS
CO TTO N GOODS
FLOUR M IL L S
PETROLEUM (REFINING)
SHIPBUILDING (8 T E E L )
LUM BER. T IM B E R PROOUCTS
RAILROAD REPAIR 8HOPS
CLO THING (W O M EN ’S )
CLO THING (M EN*8)
BOOTS ANO 8HO E8
BAKERIES
WOOLEN AND WORSTED G O O08
ELECTRICAL APPARATUS
RUBBER GOODS
LEATHER
NEWSPAPER8. P ER IO DICALS (P.P)
BLAST FURNACES

]

PAPER AND WOOO PULP

|

TO BACC O (CIGARS. CIGARETTES)!
SUGAR REFINING (C A N E )
K N IT GOODS
A UTO M O BILE BODIES, PARTS
S IL K 0 0 0 0 8
COPPER (S M E LTIN G . REFINING)
CONFECTIONERY, ICE CREAM
FOOD PREPARATIONS
BOOK AND JO B (P R IN T , P U B .)
BUTTER
O IL ANO CAKE ( CO TTO N8EED)
FURNITURE
CARS (8TE AM -R A ILR O A D )
LUM BER (P L A N IN G M ILLS )
B R A 88, B RONZE ANO COPPER
ENGINES (8 T E A M , GAS, W A TE R ) j j
CHEMICALS
C A NNING (F R U IT S . VEGETABLES)
L IQ U O R S '(M A L T )

GAS (M AN U FA C TU R E D )
DYEING, FINISHING TE XTILE S
SOAP
COKE (N O T IN C . G AS'H O USE)
AGRICULTURAL IM P LE M E NTS
COFFEE AND SPICES
S TR U C T U R A L IRONWORK
FERTILIZERS
GLASS
P A IN T8
MILLINERY ANO LACE GOODS

1382)




10
.0 0

1.600

V//////SS//////S///S/S//SSSSS//////S///////////////S//////,

S TEE L ROLLING M ILLS

CONOENSED M ILK

600

2.000

2JBOO

3.000

3.600

4,000

PLATE No. 348

AVERAGE NUMBER OF WAGE EARNERS, BY STATES: 1919 AND 1914.
THOUSANDS
0

100

2 0 0 ______ 300_________ 400________ 600

600

700

800

900

1,000

1.100

MEW YORK
PENNSYLVANIA
OHIO
MASSACHUSETTS
ILLINOIS
NEW JERSEY
MICHIGAN
CONNECTICUT
IN D IAN A
WISCONSIN
CALIFORNIA
MISSOURI
NORTH CAROLINA
MARYLAND
RHODE ISLAND
WASHINGTON
GEORGIA
VIR G IN IA
MINNESOTA
TEXAS
ALABAMA
LOUISIANA
TENNESSEE
MAINE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
WEST VIR G IN IA
IOWA
SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORIDA
KENTUCKY
KANSAS
OREGON
MISSISSIPPI
ARKANSAS
NEBRASKA
COLORADO
VERMONT
OKLAHOMA
DELAWARE
UTAH
MONTANA
IDAHO
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
ARIZONA
WYOMING
SOUTH DAKOTA
NEW MEXICO
NORTH DAKOTA
NEVADA




(383)

1.200

PLATE No. 349

AVERAGE NUMBER OF WAGE EARNERS BY INDUSTRIES EMPLOYING OVER 40,000 WAGE EARNERS: 1919 AND 1914.
H U N DR ED S OF TH O USAN DS

2

___________3

r a i l b o a o r e p a ir s h o p s

FOUNDRY AND MACHINE-SHOP

jgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggfjggggggggggggggggggggssggsssgggggggggggggggggggsis************}***?*******^

LUM BER A N D TIM B E R PRODUCT8

Kgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggsgssggggsgggg3gggggggggggggggggggggg60ggggggg

CO TTO N GOODS

g 0 g ^g g ^g g g g g g g ^g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g < g g g g g g g g ^^g ^^^^9 g g g ^g g g g ^^^^

STEEL ROLLING M ILLS
SHIPBUILDING (STEEL)
E LECTRICAL APPARATUS
BOOTS AND SHOES

$ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg0gggggggggggggg*gg&ggg9gggg0

AUTO MO BILES

y ///////////////////////A

CLO THING (M EN ’S)

5gg5gg*gggg5ggg5ggg5gg*5g5ggg55igggggg5ggg5gg*5ggg*5g0

K N IT GOODS

$ggggggggggggggggg*ggggggggggggggggg?ggggggggg&

WOOLEN AND WORSTED GOOOS

'///////////S/////
///// /////S/////
////S///// //////

CLO THING W O M EN'8 I
SLAUGHTERING, M EAT PACKING
BAKERIES
TO BACCO (CIGARS. C IG AR ETTES )
FURNITURE

F
Sggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg#

A UTO M O BILE BODIES ANO PARTS
S IL K GOOOS
BOOK ANO JOB ( P R IN T., P U B . )

Sgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg*

NEWSPAPERS, P ERIO DICALS ( P. P >

ggggggggggggggggggg^gggg^^gggggggg

RUBBER GOODS
PAPER ANO WOOD PULP
CONFECTIONERY AND ICE CREAM
LUMBER ( P L A N IN G -M IL L )
ENGINES (STEAM . GAS, W A T E R )

I 1919
I 1914

GLA8S
BRICK, TERRA-COTTA. FIRE-CLAY
BRASS, BRO NZE, COPPER
LEATHER
CANNING (F R U IT S , VEG E TA BLE S)
PETROLEUM (REFINING)
DYEING. FINISHING TEXTILES
B O X E S (F A N C Y AND PAPER)
CHEMICALS
A UTO M O BILE REPAIRING
AGRICULTURAL IM PLEM ENTS
MACHINE TO O LS
CAR8 STEAM -RAILRO AD)
M ILLIN E R Y AND LACE GOODS
FLO U R-M ILL ANO G R I8TM ILL
S TR U C T U R A L IRONW ORK
SHIPBUILDING (W OO D)

'

GAS (ILLU M IN A TIN G AND HEATING
BOXES (P A C K IN G )
HARDW ARE
B LAST FURNACES

(384)




NO RETURNS

PLATE No. 350

1. VALUE OF MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS, BY STATES: 1919.

2. PER CENT OF INCREASE IN POPULATION, 1910-1920, AND IN MANUFACTURES, 1909-1919.




P ER C E N T

(3sr>)







MINES AND QUARRIES
PLATES 351-361

MINES AND QUARRIES.
T itle.

Pla te
N o.

351

352

353
354
355

1. Value of products, mining industries, by states: 1919,
1909, and 1902.
2. Per cent distribution of value of products of mining
industries, by geographic divisions: 1919.
1. Value of products, leading mining industries: 1919,
1909, and 1902.
2. Per cent distribution of value of products of mining
industries, by industries: 1919.
3. Value of products, mining industries, by states: 1919
(map).
^Value of products, leading mining industries, by states:
1919.
Value of products, leading mining industries, by states:
1909.
Coal fields of the United States: 1919 (map).
(388)




Fl a t s

T itle,

No.
356 Principal petroleum and natural-gas fields of the United
States: 1919 (map).
1. Principal iron-ore producing localities: 1919 (map).
357 2. Comparative production, anthracite and b it u m i n o u s
coal, by decades: 1829-1919.
1. Annual production of anthracite and bituminous coal:
1889-1919.
358 2. Production of iron ore, United States and principal
producing regions: 1879-1920.
1. Production of iron ore, by principal states: 1,879-1919.
359
2. Per cent of production of iron ore, by states: 1919.
360 Gold and silver producing localities: 1919 (map).
361 Lead and zinc, and copper producing localities: 1919
(map).

PLATE No. 351

1. VALUE OF PRODUCTS, MINING INDUSTRIES, BY STATES: 1919, 1909, AND 1902.




M IL L IO N S O F DOLLARS

300

400

600

(380)

PLATE No. 352

I. VALUE OF PRODUCTS, LEADING MINING INDUSTRIES: 1919, 1909, AND 1902.
M IL L IO N S O F D O L L A R S

3. VALUE OF PRODUCTS, MINING INDUSTRIES, BY STATES: 1919.

(390)




PLATE No. 353

VALUE OF PRODUCTS, LEADING MINING INDUSTRIES, BY STATES: 1919.
C O A L . A N T H R A C IT E
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
PENNSYLVANIA

I
flO ISO 200
I I I I I I i

r r

flto
i

i

260

i

i

i

i

r

C O A L . B IT U M IN O U S
MILLION8 OF DOLLAR8
PEN N SYLVAN IA
W EST VIRG IN IA
ILLINOIS
OHIO
KENTUCKY
IN D IAN A
ALABAMA
COLORADO

L IM E S T O N E

C R A N IT E

SAN DSTO N E

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

MILLIONS OP DOLLARS

MILLIONS Or DOLLARS

VIRGINIA
W YOM IN G
IOWA

PENNSYLVANIA

K ANSAS

OHIO

OKLAHOMA

INDIANA

TEN N ESSEE

NEW YORK

UTAH

ILLINOIS

MISSOURI

r

WASHINGTON

VERMONT

____ »
0

P E N N S Y L V A N IA !

M ASSACH U SETTS!

TP

OHIO

NORTH CAROLINA|

ILLINOIS

W ISCONSIN
NEW HAM PSHIRE |
MAINE
MINNESOTA

PETR O LEU M AN D N A TU RA L GAS

PH O SPH ATE R O CK

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
100
120
140
ISO

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

OKLAHOMA

FLORIDA

TEXAS

TENNESSEE

r n

CALIFORNIA
W EST VIRGINIA
KANSAS
PENNSYLVANIA

BA SA LT

GYPSU M

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

OHIO
LOUISIANA
ILLINOIS

PENNSYLVANIA

KENTU CKY

NEW JERSEY

WYOMING

Ma s s a c h u s e t t s !

NEW YORK

CONNECTICUT

I

NEW YORK
IOWA

!

INDIANA

IR O N O R E

L E A D A N D Z IN C

SLATE

MILLION8 OF DOLLAR8

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

MILLIONS OP DOLLARS

40

60

80

100

OKLAHOMA

MICHIGAN

P E N N SY L V A N IA !

MISSOURI

MINNESOTA

VERM ONT

J
P

|

IDAHO

ALABAMA
NEW YORK
W ISCONSIN

G O LD A N D S IL V E R

GO LD

CO PPER

LODE MINES

PLACER MINES

M ARBLE

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

MILLIONS OP OOLLARS

2
0

ARIZONA
MICHIGAN




4_
0

COLORADO
NEVADA
CALIFORNIA

n

CALIFORNIA

VERMONT
TENNESSEE

0

m

(391)

P L A T E No. 354

VALUE OF PRODUCTS, LEADING MINING INDUSTRIES, BY STATES: 1909.
C O A L . A N T H R A C IT E
MILLION* OF DOLLAR*
______ T ______ *0_______*0
O
0_______ 10______ 30______ »0______ 40______ *0______ SO
P
ennsylvania

II

II

II

i I i i i i M

i II

II

100

II

IIP

M

130

1*0

II

140

I II

II

ISQ

I

C OAL. BITUM INO US
MILLION* OF DOLLAR*
PENNSYLVANIA
ILLINOIS
WEST VIR IN
G IA
OHIO
ALABAMA
COLORADO
INDIANA
IOW
A
KENTUCKY

KANSAS
W
YOM
ING
W
ASHINGTON
TENNESSEE
OKLAHOMA
M
ISSOURI
MONTANA

PENNSYLVANIA
OHIO
CALIFORNIA
WEST VIR IN
G IA
ILLIN IS
O
OKLAHOM
A
KAN8AS
TEXAS

COLORADO
NEVADA
CALIFORNIA
UTAH
IDAHO

SOUTH DAKOTA

COPPER

IR O N O R E
.LLIONS OF DOLLARS
30
80
40
MINNESOTA
M IG
ICH AN
ALABAMA
NEW YO
RK
W
ISCONSIN

10

n

LEAD AND ZINC

LIME8TONE

M
ILLIONS OF DOLLARS

M
ILLIONS OF DOLLARS

MISSOURI
WISCONSIN
KANSA9
OKLAHOM
A

(392)




PENNSYLVANIA
ILLIN IS
O
INDIANA
OHIO
NEW YO
RK
MISSOURI

MILLION* OF DOLLARS
30
SO
i

MONTANA
ARIZONA
M IQ
ICH AN
CALIFORNIA
UTAH

GRANITE
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
VERM
ONT
MASSACHUSETTS
M
AINE
CALIFORNIA
W
ISCONSIN
NEW H PSHIRE
AM

0

PHOSPHATE ROCK

I
O

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
FLORIDA
TENNESSEE
SOUTH CAROLINA

0

1
0

PLATE No. 355




COAL FIELDS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1919.

(393)

[S hade d areas re present b itu m in o u s coal: s o lid b la c k area ( P e n n s y lv a n ia ) re p re se n ts a n th r a c ite coal.)

PLATE No. 356

PRINCIPAL PETROLEUM AND NATURAL-GAS FIELDS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1919.
(304)






PLATE No. 357

1. PRINCIPAL IRON-ORE PRODUCING LOCALITIES: 1919.

2. COMPARATIVE PRODUCTION, ANTHRACITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL,
BY DECADES: 1829-1919.
M IL L IO N S O F T O N S

1919
1909
1899
1889
1879
1869 ■ a
1869 B
1849 B
1839 1
18291

60
0
|
rnm^

A N T H R A C IT E
B IT U M IN O U S

(395)

P L A T E No. 358

2. PRODUCTION OF IRON ORE, UNITED STATES AND PRINCIPAL
PRODUCING REGIONS: 1879-1920.

MILLIONS OF TONS

1. ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF ANTHRACITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL:
1889-1919.

I
s
t

(3 9 6 )




PLATE No. 359

1. PRODUCTION OF IRON ORE, BY PRINCIPAL STATES: 1879-1919.
M IN N ESO TA
M IL L IO N S O F T 0 N 8

iei»
1909
1899
1889

0_______________ 8_______________ TO.______________ IB_______________ 20

u -^ 4 ■ I T

1879 ★

28

30

||[|
*

NO PRODUCTION

M IC H IG A N

MILLIONS OF TONS
t
10

IS

1919
1909
1899
1889

1879

A LA B A M A

MILLIONS OF TONS
J
S

P E N N SYLV A N IA

MILLIONS OF TONS

2. PER CENT OF PRODUCTION OF IRON ORE, BY STATES: 1919.

1919
1909
1899
1889
1879

W ISC O N SIN

MILLIONS OF TONS
1919
1909
1899
1889
1879

NEW YORK

MILLIONS OF TONS
1919
<909
1899
1889

1879

723°— 24t----- 26




(397)

PLATE No. 360

GOLD AND SILVER PRODUCING LOCALITIES: 1919.

(398)




PLATE No. 361




(399)

LEAD AND ZINC, AND COPPER PRODUCING LOCALITIES: 1919.







COTTON
PLATES 362-374

COTTON.
T itle .

362

363

364
365
366

T itle .
P late

P la te
N o.

No.

Relative importance of the several countries in the pro­
duction and consumption of cotton—
"1. Proportion of world’s mill supply of cotton contributed
by each country: 1922.
2. Proportion of total consumption of cotton, by coun­
tries, year ending July 31, 1923.
,3. Cotton production in specified years: 1790-1922.
Cotton-producing area of the United States in 1922, and
center of production: 1859, 1879, 1906, 1910, 1912,
1914, 1916, 1918, 1919, and 1922 (map).
Cotton ginned, by counties: 1922 (maps)—
Mississippi and Alabama.
Arkansas and Oklahoma.
Louisiana and Florida.
(402)




367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374

Georgia and South Carolina.
North Carolina and Tennessee.
Texas.
{
Per cent of cotton grown in each state, crop of 1922.
1. Cotton ginnings to specified dates: 1905-1922.
|
2. Area and yield of cotton: 1893-1922.
Cotton consumed, by months: September, 1912, to July,
1923.
’
Cotton stocks, by months: September, 1912, to Julv,
1923.
'
Cotton imports, by months: September, 1912, to Julv,
1923.
‘
Exports of domestic cotton, by specified countries and by
months: September, 1912, to July, 1923.

PLATE No. 362

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE SEVERAL COUNTRIES IN THE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF COTTON.
1. PROPORTION OF W ORLD’S M ILL SUPPLY OF COTTON CONTRIBUTED
B Y EACH COU N TRY: 1922.




2. PROPORTION OF TOTAL CONSUMPTION OF COTTON, BY COUNTRIES,
YEAR ENDING JULY 31, 1923.

3. COTTON PRODUCTION IN SPECIFIED YEARS: 1790-1922.

(403)

PLATE No. 363

1404 l

COTTON-PRODUCING AREA OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1922, AND CENTER OF PRODUCTION: 1859, 1879, 1906, 1910, 1912, 1914, 1916, 1918, 1919, AND 1922.
T h e c e n te r o f p r o d u c tio n in 1839 was a p p ro x im a te ly 13 m ile s sou th e a st o f M acon, in N o x u b e e C o u n ty , M is s .; in 1879 i t w as 11 m ile s s o u th o f C o lu m b u s , i n L o w n d e s C o u n ty ; i n 1908 i t w as 5 m ile s n o rth e a s t o f M ayersv ille , i n Issa q u e n a C o u n ty ; in 1910 i t w a s 3 m ile s s o u th w e s t o f V a id e n , i n C a rr o ll C o u n ty ; i n 1912 i t w a s 2 m ile s n o r t h o f M id n ig h t, in S h a rk e y C o u n ty ; i n 1914 i t w as 1 m ile n o rth w e s t o f S h a rp sh u rg , in M a d is o n C o u n ty : in
1916 i t w as 16 m ile s s o u th e a s t o f A re o la , in W a s h in g to n C o u n ty ; in 1918 i t w as 6 m ile s s o u th e a s t o f S tu rg is , in O k tib b e h a C o u n ty ; in 1919 i t was 5.6 m ile s n o rth e a s t o f G reenw ood, in L e flo re C o u n ty , M iss.; a n d in 1922 i t was
5 m ile s east b y n o r th o f L a k e V illa g e , in C h ic o t C o u n ty , A r k .




PLATE No. 364

COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
M IS S IS S IP P I.

ALABAM A.

O O T T O N G I N N E D : 1921
I

I NONE REPORTED

flllll

LESS TH AN 8.000 BALES

V////A

8,000 TO iO.OOO BALES

E r a

ESS

10.000 TO 18.000 BALES
18,000 T O 28,000 BALES

g ra n

(405)



28.000 T O 40.000 BALES

B

40.000 B ALES A N D O V E R

PLATE No. 365

COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
ARKANSAS.

C O T T O N G IN N E D :
C

D

1921

H ONE REPORTED

H l l l l L E M TH A N 8.000 BALES
8.000 TO 10.000 BALES
10.000 TO 18.000 BALE8

EH

18.000 T O 26.000 BALE8

B

20.000 T O 80.000 BALES

I—

O KLAHO M A.

(400)




3

1 40.000 B ALES AND OVER

PLATE No. 366




o
t
COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
L O U IS IA N A .

F L O R ID A .

PLATE No. 367

COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
(408)



G E O R G IA .

SOUTH

C A R O L IN A .




PLATE Wo. 368

COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
NO RTH

C A R O L IN A .

O O T T O N Q I N N E D : 1821
I

I NON E REPORTED

mm

\////A

LE SS TH A N B.OOQ BALES
6,00 0 T O 10.000 BALES

l& g & a 10.000 T O IS.OOO BALES
p M
I W

16.000 T O 26,000 BALES
I

■SI

26,000 T O 40,000 BALES
40.000 B ALES A N D O V E R

TENNESSEE.

(40m

PLATE No. 369

COTTON GINNED, BY COUNTIES: 1922.
TEXAS.

C O T T O N G I N N E D : 1821
E = U

NONE REPORTED

t i l l l l LE 88 TH A N 5,000 BALES

yy//A

5,000 TO 10.000 BALES

fcSt&M 10,000 T O 15.000 BALES

EH

15,000 T O 25.000 BALES

t o l l l 25.000 T O 40,000 BALES
■

I

Vt.OOQ B A L E , A N D O V E R

PER CENT OF COTTON GROWN IN EACH STATE, CROP OF 1922.

1410)




PLATE No. 370




M ILLIO N S O f B A L E !

MILLIONS OF BALES

I. COTTON GINNINGS TO SPECIFIED DATES: 1905-1922.

YA
EM

M

1

i

2. AREA AND YIELD OF COTTON: 1893-1922.
IM

Ml

r*i»

■ S
M

M ---

«M
r

/ —

■M
l

v

-N

- V |s- -J t
—s A-

■ --a

im

M --• --•

_

“
'

« ---

V

—
\

IM

PLATE No. 371

to




TM O O f A N D * O r B A k P l

COTTON CONSUMED, BY MONTHS: SEPTEMBER, 1912, TO JULY, 1923.

P L A T E No. 372

COTTON STOCKS, BY MONTHS: SEPTEMBER, 1912, TO JULY, 1923.
M ILLIO N S OP BALE8

o______

i

i

i

1913
I

S EP TEM B ER
NOVEMBER
D ECEM B ER

10/7'

|

ISIS

|

10/5

I

1914

I

1913

OCTOBER

p W / V Ta IN C ONSU M IN G E S TA B LIS H M E N TS
O O TTQ N -O W O W IN Q S TA TE S

7H.'!°--2lt----- 27




4

M ILLIO NS OP BALES

PLATE No. 373

COTTON IMPORTS, BY MONTHS: SEPTEMBER, 1912, TO JULY, 1923.
TH O U S A N D S OP &ALE8
#

(414)




tt

10

7»

Th o u s a n d s o p d a l e s

PLATE No. 374

EXPORTS OF DOMESTIC COTTON, BY SPECIFIED COUNTRIES AND BY MONTHS: SEPTEMBER, 1912, TO JULY, 1923.
TH O U S A N D 8 OP BALES
ISO

500

TO
O

TH OUSANDS OF BALES

1.000
JA N U AR Y

1913

FE B R U A R Y
M ARCH

I

A PR IL
M AY
®

JUNE

2

JU LY
AUGUST
S E P TE M B E R

1913

OCTOBER
NOVEM BER
DE C E M B E R
JA N U AR Y
FE B R UA RY
M ARCH

I

A P R IL
M AY
®

JUNE

2

JU LY
A UGU8T
S E P TE M B E R

1914

OCTOBER
NOVEM BER
DECEMBER
JA N U AR Y
FE B R U A RY
M ARCH

I

A PR IL
M AY
g
-

JUNE
JULY
AU GU 8T
SE P TE M B E R

1916

OCTOBER
NOVEM BER
DECEMBER
JA N U AR Y
FE B R U A RY
M ARCH

•

A PR IL
M AY
-

JUNE

2

JU LY
AU GU 8T
SE P TE M B E R

1916

OCTOBER
NOVEM BER
DECEMBER
JA NU ARY
FE B R U A R Y
M ARCH
APRIU

|

M AY
a

JUNE

2

JU LY
A U G U 8T
SEPTEM BER

1017

O CTO BER




NOV E M B E R
DE C E M B E R

(415)







ENCUMBERED HOMES
P L A T E S 375-389

ENCUMBERED HOMES.

T itle .
Pla te
N o.

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

T itle .
P la te

1. Homes not on farms— per cent rented and owned, by
sections and geographic divisions: 1890-1920.
2. Homes not on farms— per cent owned mortgaged,
owned free, and rented, by geographic divisions:
.
1890-1920.
Homes not on farms— per cent owned mortgaged, owned
free, and rented, by states: 1890-1920.
1. Per cent of homes owned mortgaged, owned free, and
rented, for cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more:
1920.
2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms—ratio (per
cent) of mortgage debt to value, by states: 1920
and 1890.
1. Owned homes not on farms— per cent free, and mort­
gaged, by sections and geographic divisions: 18901920.
2 . Owned homes not on farms— per cent mortgaged, by
states: 1920 and 1890.
1. Owned homes not on farms— per cent mortgaged:
1920 (map).
2 . Owned homes not on farms—per cent mortgaged:
1890 (map).
1. Owned homes—per cent mortgaged, for cities having
100,000 inhabitants or more: 1920.
^2. Owned mortgaged homes— ratio (per cent) of mort­
gage debt to value, for cities having 100,000 in­
habitants or m ore: 1920.
1. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— value and
mortgage debt, by geographic divisions: 1920 and
1890.
2 . Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average value
and average mortgage debt per home, by sections
and geographic divisions: 1920 and 1890.
1. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average
value and average mortgage debt per home, by
states: 1920 and 1890.
2 . Owned mortgaged homes— average value and average
mortgage debt per home, for cities having 100,000
inhabitants or more: 1920.

( 418)




383 Owned mortgaged homes— average value and average
mortgage debt per home, for cities having, in 1890,
100,000 inhabitants or more: 1920 and 1890.
1. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— ratio of debt
to value: 1920 (map).
2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— ratio of debt
to value: 1890 (map).
1. Owned mortgaged homes— ratio (per cent) of mort­
gage debt to value, for cities having, in 1890, 100,000
inhabitants or more: 1920 and 1890.
OOP
<2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— per cent of
total number and total mortgage debt bearing
specified rates of interest, for the United States:
.
1920 and 1890.
1. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average
annual rate of interest, by geographic divisions:
1920 and 1890.
’
386 2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average
annual interest charge per home, by geographic
divisions: 1920 and 1890.
1. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average
annual rate of interest, by states: 1920 and 1890.
387 2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— average
annual interest charge per home, by states: 1920
.
and 1890.
1. Owned mortgaged homes— average annual rate of
interest, for cities having 100,000 inhabitants or
more: 1920.
388 2. Owned mortgaged homes— average annual interest
charge per home, for cities having 100,000 inhabit­
ants or more: 1920.
1. Owned mortgaged homes— average annual interest
charge per home, for cities having, in 1890, 100,000
inhabitants or more: 1920 and 1890.
389
2. Owned mortgaged homes not on farms— per cent of
total number and total value in each value class, for
the United States: 1920 and 1890.

P L A T E No. 375

2. HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -P E R CEN T OWNED M ORTGAGED, OW NED
AND REN TED, BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1890-1920.
PER C E N T

U N IT E D • T A T E 8

20

1820
1910
1900
1890

30

40

60

60

70

80

90

'/ / / / / >
’s s / s s S s s s z s s / x r t z z *

U N IT E D S TA TE S
1890

y a z z z z z z i

—

—

1920

TH E NORTH

1910
N E W E N G LA N D

' / / / // . / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / z
ssssry

1900
1890

NEW ENGLAND

1920
1910
M ID D L E A T L A N T IC
1900
MIDDLE A TLA N T IC

1890

1910

E A ST NOR TH C E N TR A L

EAST NO RTH CE N TR A L
1900

W E 8 T NOR TH C E N TR A L

W EST NORTH CENTRAL
1900

TH E 8 0 U T H

1920
1910

m w y/ A M S M m / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

S O U T H A T L A N T IC
1900

^ ^ ^ ^ a z g B e a z f f l z z g z M g z B Z Z
1890
v w / rM '/ / / / / ./ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

COUTH A TLA N T IC

f/ S S S / S S / S S / S S S S S S S J ? .
EAST SOU TH C E N TR A L

E A ST 8 0 U T H C E N TR A L

m Bm m sm sssss/s/ssssss/ss/sssj
MSmam6SS////S/SSS/S/////SS///.

W E 8 T SO U TH C E N TR A L

W EST SOUTH C E N TR A L

D
TH E W E 8 T

> Y /i

W ////tf////y///fr///////////777,

HBgBBgg
M OUNTAIN

____r / / j W
/
- '/ / / / / A

W

P A C IF IO

rfV///)/777S/////////>///////Z7^
/ / / / i _____________
**lt////7////;//>//////7///////77VZ777,
.......................... ......... ...................................................- .

/y //////x x x x i

W / / / /// / // / / // / / // / / / / / / X
,. z z r <
r j^/y//yy//yyyy///y/yyy/////yy//yzyy.
^
o 5ZZ
z g » Z r s J t s fjr fjr jS fjR w Jw yyyyypyyyyyyyyyyyy?yyyyzz
L
^////A/y/////y//z//////y///A
*W ZZz z z z m a z z z z z z z z z g r
a
r W

M O U N T A IN

V

RENTED

£ 2 2 2 3 OW N E D

P A C IF IC

E ^ ^ OW NED M O R TG A G ED F ^ ^ O W N ED FREE J g ^ ^ E N T E D

FREE,

(on-)




1. HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -P E R CEN T REN TED AND OWNED, BY SECTIONS
AND GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1890-1920.

P L A T E No. 376

HOMES NOT ON FARMS-PER CENT OWNED MORTGAGED, OWNED FREE, AND RENTED, BY STATES: 1890-1920.
PER C E N T

z

w . v a .

;;

ESSSSOW NED M O R T Q A Q E D ^S Z a o W N E D

(42 0 )




FREE

P L A T E No. 377

I. PER CENT OF HOMES OWNED MORTGAGED, OWNED FREE, AND RENTED, FOR
CITIES HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920.
PER CENT
AKRON

M A IN E

ALBANY
Z

BOSTON
BRIDGEPORT
BUFFALO

VERM O N T

“

BIRMINGHAM

NEW H AM PSHIRE

^
Z
“

ATLANTA
BALTIMORE

R H O D E IS L A N D

1

C O N N E C T IC U T

CAMBRIDGE
CAMDEN
CHICAGO

NEW YO RK
N EW JER SE Y

CINCINNATI
CLEVELAND
COLUMBUS, OHIO

P E N N S Y L V A N IA
- l OHIO

DALLAS
DAYTON
DENVER
DES MOINES
DETROIT

H IN D IA N A
®0

Idl
e

O

Z W ISC ON SIN
M IN N E S O T A

HARTFORD
HOUSTON

KANSAS CITY, KANS.
KANSAS CITY, MO.

0

k

So
2

D E LA W A R E
M ARYLAND

NASHVILLE
NEW BEDFORD
NEW HAVEN

9

V IR G IN IA

jE
D

N O R T H C A R O L IN A

§

BROOKLYN
M ANHATTAN

RICHMOND, VA.
ROCHESTER
ST . LOUIS

D I8 T . OF C O L U M B IA

|
-J
^

NEW ORLEANS
NEW YORK
BRONX

PHILADELPHIA
PITTSBURGH
PORTLAND, OREOj
PROVIDENCE
READING

SOUTH C A R O L IN A

F LO R ID A
X

Fj
m
i-

J A LA B A M A

h

tu

M ISSISSIPPI

*

ARKANSAS

O k L O U IS IA N A

0H
9
So
J

WILMINGTON. DEL.
WORCESTER
YONKERS
YOUNGSTOW N




OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
M ONTANA
ID A H O

z

WYOM ING

£
Z
g

COLORADO

1

NEW M EXICO
A R IZ O N A
UTAH

SYRACUSE
TOLEDO
TRENTON
WASHINGTON

KE NTUCKY

O K TENNE8SEE

SALT LAKE CITY

SCRANTON
SEATTLE
SPOKANE
SPRINGFIELD. M ASS.

W EST V IR G IN IA

GEOR GIA

ST . PAUL
SAN ANTONIO
SAN FRANCISCO

N EBR A SKA
KAN8A8

MINNEAPOLIS

OAKLAND
OMAHA
PATERSON

N O R TH D A K O T A

H SOUTH D A K O T A

LOWELL
MEMPHIS
MILWAUKEE

NORFOLK

IOW A

y- M ISSOURI
^ .z

LOS ANGELES
LOUISVILLE

QUEENS
RICHMOND
NEWARK

IL L IN O IS

H MICHIGAN

FALL RIVER
FORT WORTH
GRAND RAPIDS

INDIANAPOLIS
JERSEY CITY

M ASSAC H USETTS

NEVADA
0

W A S H IN G T O N

't

OREGON
C A L IF O R N IA

(4 2 1 ,l

2. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -R A T IO (PER C E N T) OF
MORTGAGE DEBT TO VALUE, B Y STATES: 1920 AND 1890.

P L A T E No. 378

I. OWNED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -P E R CEN T FREE, AND M ORTGAGED, BY
SECTIONS AND GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1890-1920.
(4 2 2 )

0
U N IT E D S T A T E S

■ oK
»>
i.oo
*a9°
W

T H E NO RTH

10

1900 w

^

gO

80

/ / / / / >

40

60

60

T
O

I

/ / / / ^

|

CONNECTICUT

/ / / / / / / / / S ///////////Y ////////////////////////////A

/ / / / / / / S S S S S S S S / S S S / / / / /V YS/SS/S/SS//SSSSSS/SSSS//J
EA ST N O RTH C E N TR A L

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / S / / S / / / / / / / / / SY///SS///S//SS////S,

S S S S S S / S / S / S // S / // / // // /S y A i y S // /S S / // // /S /S /S A

T H E SO UTH

S O U T H A T L A N T IC

EASTSO UTH CENTRAL

T H E W EST

s / / / s s s s s s / / / / / / / / / s / / / / / / / sv//s/////s/s///y//j
S/S////////S///
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / A y '////////A

YYYyyYYyyyy/Y//Y///Yy^//y////////YY/////////AY///Y
s / / 7 T 7 7 / s s s y s s s / / / / / / / / / / / /vs/sssssssss/sssssss/.
y y y y y y y y y / y / / / / / / / / / / s/ / / / / y / / / y / / / / / / / / sy y / ,

s y yyy yyy yyy yyy yyy yy yyy yyy y/v y yyy yyy /y /y yY y yyy yyy

—

yyyyyyyyyyyyyy/.

M O U N T A IN

P A C IF IC




M AINE

s

/

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy/////

W EST SO UTH C EN TR AL

SO_____

S fS S S ffffS fffS S fS S l. ■

s s s s s s s s s s /s // / / / / / / ,

W E 8T N O R T H C E N T R A L

PER C ENT

SO...... B ___ IO
O
C

NEW E N G LAN D

M IO D L E A T L A N T IC

2. OW NED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -P E R CEN T MORTGAGED, BY STATES: 1920
A N D 1890.

/ yyyy/ yy/ yyy/ / / / / / / / / / y/ y/ / / / / V / / / / / / / / / / / Y / / / y

^^^MORTOAOSO

P L A T E No. 379

1. OWNED HOMES NOT ON FARMS-PER CENT MORTGAGED: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 55.4 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. OWNED HOMES NOT ON FARMS—PER CENT MORTGAGED: 1890.
[District of Columbia, 24 per cent, not shown separately on the map.




N o mortgaged homes were reported for Oklahoma in 1890.]

(423)

P L A T E No. 380

I. OW NED H O M E S -P E R CEN T M ORTGAGED, FOR CITIES HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS
OR MORE: 1920.

(424)



o

MARTFORO
■
WORCESTER
|
NEW YORK
|
BRIDGEPORT
|
SPRINGFIELD
|
YONKERS
|
TRENTON
|
NEWARK
|
NEW )4AVEN
|
PHILADELPHIA
|
ROCHESTER
|
CAMD%N
|
BOSTON
|
SYRACUSE
|
AKRON
|
CHICAGO
|
JERSEY CITY
|
KANSAS CITY. MO.
|
WILMINGTON. DEL.
|
FALL RIVER
|
NEW BEDFORD
|
PATERSON
|
OCTROIT
|
BUFFALO
I
CAMBRIDGE
|
MILWAUKEE
I
CLEVELAND
I
DAYTON
|
PROVIDENCE
|
INOIANAPOUS
|
WASHINGTON
|
YOUNGSTOWN
|
MINNEAPOUS
I
LOWELL
|
COLUMBUS. OHIO
I
OMAHA
I
READING
|
GRAND RAPIOft
|
SEATTLE
|
TOUDO
I
DCS MOINES
I
SALT LAKE OJTY
|
ATLANTA
|
LOS ANGELES
|
jDAKLANO,
I
Pit t s b u r g h
j
BALTIMORE
|
DALLAS
j
PORTLAND. OREO.
|
FORT WORTH
I
KANSAS CITY. KANS. I
NORFOLK
|
ST. LOUIS
|
ST. PAUL
|
ALBANY
|
CINCINNATI
|
SPOKANE
|
BIRMINGHAM
|
DENVER
|
SAN FRANCISCO
I
MEMPHIS
I
HOUSTON
|
LOUISVILLE
|
RICHMOND
|
SCRANTON
|
SAN ANTONIO
|
NEW ORLEANS
|
H a s h v il l e

|

10

20

PER C E N T
30_________ 40_________ 60

60

2. OW NED MORTGAGED HOMES— RATIO (P E R C EN T) OF MORTGAGE
DEBT TO VALUE, FOR CITIES HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS OR
MORE: 1920.

70_________ 80

MR OENT

0

PHILADELPHIA
KAN8A8 OITY, MO.
WORCESTER
FALL RIVER *
SPRINGFIELD, MASS.
NEW YORK
CAMDEN
OAVTON
HARTFORD
8EATTLE
NEWARK
CAMBRIDGE
WASHINGTON
TRENTON
608TON
ST. LOUI8
NORFOLK
JER8EY CITY
READING
PATER80N
NASHVILLE
BRIDGEPORT
MILWAUKEE
OAKLANO
SAN ANTONIO
MEMPHIS
NEW HAVEN
LOWELL
NEW SEOFORO
CINCINNATI
BIRMINGHAM
AKRON
SALT LAKE CITY
RICHMOND
YOUNGSTOWN
QRANO RAPIOS
ALBANY
SAN FRANCISCO
FORT WORTH
NEW ORLEANS
KANSAS OITY. KANS.
BUFFALO
PROVIDENCE
CHICAGO
'
OENVER
HOUSTON
YONKERS
INOIANAPOUS
ROCHESTER
LOUISVILLE
PORTLANO, OREGON
WILMINGTON. DEL.
PITTSBURGH
DCS MOINES
TOLEDO
OETROIT
ATLANTA
DALLAS
ST. PAUL
BALTIMORE
SPOKANE
SYRACUSE
LOS ANGELES
COLUMBUS. OHIO
OMAHA
CLEVELAND
SCRANTON
MINNEAPOUS

1
0

8
9

SO

4
0

I

6
0

P L A T E No. 381

1. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON FARMS-VALUE AND MORTGAGE DEBT,
BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920 AND 1890.
H U N D R E D S O F M IL L IO N S

2. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON FARMS-AVERAGE VALUE AND AVERAGE MORTGAGE
DEBT PER HOME, BY SECTIONS AND GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920 AND 1890.




TH OUSANDS OF DOLLARS

U N IT E D S T A T E S

y /y w /x x y y y /M

T H E NORTH

_____________
-----

..■
..

'////M's'z z s z m
>777777*

NEW ENGLAND

W
//////////////f i
v >/////ia g z
J
y SS*S***S**i'////////////////

MIDDLE ATLANTIC

/y ////////y
w a w i

EAST NORTH C ENTRAL

W EST NORTH CENTRAL

1" "

L ~ T

E
yzy/////////} ’//////)/////>

A
7ZR
" " •
'

1

i

THE SOUTH

SOUTH ATLANTIC

E A ST SO UTH CENTRAL

W E 8 T S O U T H CEN TR A L

w
w
w

///y
//w

W
/ / / / / / / > ! :#
/ i -----------------

// /// /// x
;

W w
i
5 a

/a

................... ~ ~ ~

vw / / fym

m ! . . -.
; . — . . . . . . . . ;.i
-- ------------------n

T H E WEST

M OUNTAIN

PACIFIC

AVER AG E M ORTGAGE D E B T

V JH /A

AVER AG E V A LU E

(4 2 5 )

P L A T E No. 382

1. OW NED M ORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -A V E R A G E VALUE AND
AVERAGE MORTGAGE DEBT PER HOME, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1890.
(4 2 6 )



2. OWNED MORTGAGED H O M E S -A V E R A G E VALUE A N D AVERAGE MORTGAGE
DEBT PER HOME, FOR CITIES HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920.
T H O U 8A N D

8

OF D O LLAR S

HARTFORD
YONKER8
NEW YO RK
NEW ARK
NEW HAVEN
D E T R O IT
W ORCESTER
S P R IN G F IE L D . M A $ &
W A S H IN G T O N
B R ID G E P O R T
AKRON
BO STON
P IT T S B U R G H
J E R S E Y C IT Y
C A M B R ID G E
S Y R A C U 8E
C LE VELAN D
R IC H M O N D . V A .
C H IC A G O
BUFFALO
ATLANTA
ALBANY
N O R FO LK
F A L L R IV E R
ROCHESTER
N EW BEOFORD
Y O U N G 8T O W N
P R O V ID E N C E
W IL M IN G T O N , D E L .
S A N F R A N C I 8C O
PATERSON
LO S A N G E LE S
D ALLA8
M IL W A U K E E
K A N S A 8 C IT Y , M O .
M IN N E A P O L IS
H O U 8T O N
N EW O R LE AN S
C O L U M B U 8 , O H IO
M E M P H I8
C IN C IN N A T I
P H IL A D E L P H IA
TO LED O
S T . L O U IS
OMAHA
DAYTO N
D E 8 M O IN E S
TRENTO N
O A KLA N D
B IR M IN G H A M
ST. PAUL
DENVER
LO W E LL

8C R A N T O N
IN D IA N A P O L IS
S A N A N T O N IO
S A L T L A K E C IT Y
FO R T W O R TH
P O R T L A N O . OREO .
R E A D IN G
G R A N D R A P ID 8 .
CAMDEN

8PO KANE
SE ATTLE
B A L T IM O R E
L O U I 8 V IL L E
N A S H V IL L E
K A N S A S C IT Y . K A N S .

E D Z i A V E R A G E MORTGAGE DEBT
W JTIf/m AVERAGE VALUE

P L A T E No. 385

OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES-AVERAGE VALUE AND AVERAGE MORTGAGE DEBT PER HOME,
FOR CITIES HAVING, IN 1890, 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920 AND 1890.
THOUSANDS O F DOLLARS
NEW YO R K
NEW ARK
D E T R O IT
W A S H IN G T O N
B O S TO N
P IT T S B U R G H
J E R S E Y C IT Y
C LEVELAN D
C H IC A G O
BUFFALO
R O CH ESTER
P R O V ID E N C E
S A N FR A N C IS C O
M IL W A U K E E
K A N S A S C IT Y , M O .
M IN N E A P O L IS
NEW OR LEAN S
C IN C IN N A T I
P H ILA D E LP H IA
S T . LO U IS
OMAHA
8 T. PAUL
D EN VE R
IN D IA N A P O LIS
B A L T IM O R E
L O U I8 V IL L E




T JV /S A A V E R A G E V AL U E
AVER AG E M O R TG AG E D E B T

(4 2 7 )

P L A T E No. 384

1. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON FARMS-RATIO OF DEBT TO VALUE: 1920.
[District of Columbia, 46.4 per cent, not shown separately on the map.]

2. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON FARMS-RATIO OF DEBT TO VALUE: 1890.
[District of Columbia, 34.6 per cent, not shown separately on the m ap.

(4 2 8 )




N o mortgaged homes were report ed for Oklahoma in 1890.]

P L A T E No. 385

PER CENT

PER CEN T
0

10

20

30

2. OW NED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -P E R CEN T OF TOTAL NUMBER AND
TOTAL MORTGAGE DEBT BEARING SPECIFIED RATES OF INTEREST, FOR THE
U N ITED STATES: 1920 A N D 1890.

40

60

(4291

I. OWNED M ORTGAGED H O M E S -R A T IO (PE R C EN T) OF MORTGAGE DEBT TO VALUE,
FOR CITIES HAVING, IN 1890,100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920 AND 1890.

60

P H IL A D E L P H IA

K A N S A S C IT Y , M O .
NEW YO RK
NEW ARK

W A S H IN G T O N
B08T0N

8T .

LO U IS

0 E R 8 E Y C IT Y

M IL W A U K E E
C IN C IN N A T I

S A N F R A N C IS C O

NEW O R LE AN S
BUFFALO

P R O V ID E N C E
C H IC A G O

DENVER

IN D IA N A P O L IS
L O U IS V IL L E

RO CHESTER
P IT T S B U R G H
D E T R O IT

B A L T IM O R E

OM AHA

C LE VELAN D

M IN N E A P O U S




_o4 t ------- 28

ST. PAUL

cc
?l
t-

P L A T E No. 386

I. OW N ED M O RTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S-A V E R A G E ANNUAL R AT E OF
INTEREST, B Y GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920 AND 1890.

2. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -A V E R A G E ANNUAL INTEREST
CHARGE PER HOME, B Y GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: 1920 A N D 1890.

PER CEN T

D O LLA R S
76
U N IT E D 8 T A T E S

U N IT E D S T A T E S

1920
1890

V

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ,

NEW EN G LAN D

N EW EN G LA N D

1920 's s / s s s / s / s / / / / s / s s s / s / s s s s s s s s s s / s s s / s s / s s / / s / / / / .
1890

M ID D L E

1920
1890

1920 ’* ^ * * M * * ^ * * ^ * * ^ * * f ^ * * * * ^ * ^ * ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * f ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^
1890

M IDD LE A T L A N T IC

1920
1890

A T L A N T IC

/ Z * Z * * * * J * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1

m

.

1920
1890

? * * * * * * * * !SB

****************************************1
8 0 U T H A T L A N T IC

W E ST N O RTH C EN TR A L

1920
1890

* * * * * * * * * * *

************** * * *
EA S T 8 0 U TH C EN TR A L

S O U T H A T L A N T IC

1920 fZSSZZ/SZ /
1890

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

1920^ //y //y //> /y ///// /

£

W EST
/

/

/

/

/

/ / / / / * * * * * *

SO U TH CEN TR A L
/

/

/ // / / // / // / / // / // / / // / // / / // .

M O U N T A IN
*
1920&
1890

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

P A C IF IC

* * * * * * * *3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*




**************************************
W E8T 8 0 U TH C EN TR A L

1890 m z& m zzm
a

*
1920 _______________ ,_____________ 2 £ * ______ * * * * * * * * * *
i * * *
1890

1920
1890

EA ST SO U TH CEN TR A L

1920
1890

************************************
v/////////////7m>,

W E S T N O R TH C E N T R A L

* * * * * * * * * *

1920
1890

r****************************************
**********
E A 8 T N O R TH C E N T R A L

1920
1890

EA S T N O RTH C EN TR A L

1920
1890

1920
1890

1920
1890

SBB

ZZZ
7m >,

'* * * * * * *

*******************************************
zzz
w

/a

M O U N T A IN

1920
1890

********************************************
P ACIFIC

1920
1890

* * * * * * * * * * *

P L A T E No. 387

I. OW NED M ORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -A V E R A G E ANNUAL RATE OF
INTEREST, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1890.

2. OW NED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON F A R M S -A V E R A G E ANNUAL INTEREST
CHARGE PER HOME, BY STATES: 1920 AND 1890.

PER CENT
0

20

40

SO

80

D O LLAR S
100

120

M AINE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Z

NEW HAM PSHIRE

VERMONT

0
Z
U

VERM ONT

<

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

s

RHODE ISLAND

Z

RHODE ISLAND

CONNECTICUT




CONNECTICUT
U ,£ NEW YORK
01

NEW JERSEY

2 < PENNSYLVANIA
^ OHIO
C
E
£ INDIANA
< D ILLINOIS

tail

£ MICHIGAN

O

Z WISCONSIN
MINNESOTA

_j IOW A

<

“

'

MISSOURI

£ o

NORTH DAKOTA

*b

SOUTH DAKOTA

Z

NEBRASKA
KANSAS
DELAWARE
M ARYLAND

y

D I8 T . OF C O L U M B IA

<

V IR G IN IA

»<

WEST VIRGINIA

jE

NORTH CAROLINA

3
g

SOUTH CAROLINA
GEORGIA
FLORIDA

I

KENTUCKY

Wb
t- z

TENNESSEE
ALABAM A

So
u

M ISSISSIPPI

^

ARKANSAS

O tt LOUISIANA

Wb

SS

b * OKLAHOMA
*

TEXAS
M ONTANA
ID AH O

Z
j*
Z
D

O

WYOM ING
COLORADO
NEW M EXICO
AR IZ O N A
UTAH
NEVADA

PA CIFIC

N EW EN G LA N D

MAINE

W ASH IN G T O N
OREGON
C A L IF O R N IA

W^7777777>

140

180

180

200

P L A T E No. 388

I. OW NED M ORTGAGED H O M E S -A V E R A G E ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. FOR CITIES
'
HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920.
14.32)

2. OWNED MORTGAGED H O M E S -A V E R A G E ANNUAL INTEREST CHARGE PER
HOME, FOR CITIES HAVING 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920.

PE R C ENT

D O LLAR S

FO RT W ORTH

HARTFORD

DALLAS
SA N ANTO NIO

NEW YORK
YONKER8
NEWARK

H OUSTON
SA L T LAKE C ITY
NEW ORLEANS
SPOKANE

WORCESTER
AKRON
NEW HAVEN

BIRMINGHAM

SPRINGFIELD, M AS8.

SE A TT LE

WASHINGTON
CRIDGEPORT
DETROIT

;

LO S ANGELES
PO RTLA N D, O R E G .
YO U N GSTOW N
AKRON
ATLA NTA
DES MOINES
OAKLAN D
K A N S AS C IT Y , KANS
DAYTON
OMAHA
CLEVELAND
INDIANAPOLIS
NORFOLK
DENVER
KA N SAS C IT Y , M O.
LOUISVILLE

BOSTON
CAMBRIDGE
JERSEY C IT Y
DALLAS
NORFOLK
YOUNGSTOW N
ATLANTA
FALL RIVER
RICHMOND
PITTSBURGH
KA N8A8 CITY, MO.
CHICAGO
HOU8TON
NEW ORLEANS

M INNEAPOLIS
NASHVILLE

CLEVELAND
NEW BEDFORD
L 0 8 ANGELE8

NEW BEDFORD
BAN FRANCISCO

PHILADELPHIA

BALTIM ORE
CINCINNATI
C O LU M B U S. OHIO
DETROIT
GR A N D RAPIDS
M EM PH I8
PROVIDENCE
RICHMOND
8 T . PAUL
TO LE DO

SAN FRANCI8CO
ALBANY
BUFFALO
PATER80N
PROVIDENCE
SAN ANTONIO
8YRACU8E
BIRMINGHAM
FORT WORTH
DAYTON
ROCHESTER

B RIDG EPORT

OAKLAND

CAMDEN
CHICAGO

WILMINGTON. DEL.
MEMPHIS

H AR T FO R D

CINCINNATI
S T . LOUI8

JE R SE Y CITY
LOW ELL
NEW HAVEN
PHILADELPHIA
PITT SB U R G H
8 T . LO UI8
SC R A N TO N
W A SH IN GTON
W O R C E ST E R
B O ST O N
CAMBRIDGE
FALL RIVER
NEWARK
PATE R SO N
ALBANY
SPRINGFIELD, M ASS
W ILM IN GTO N . DEL.
YONKERS

SALT LAKE CITY
DES MOINE8
MILWAUKEE
TOLEDO
COLUMBU8
MINNEAPOLIS
OMAHA
TRENTON
DENVER
SEATTLE
LOWELL
PORTLAND, OREG.
INDIANAPOLIS
ST . PAUL
SPOKANE
CAMDEN
SCRANTON
READING

B U FFALO
NEW YORK
R OCHESTER

QRANO RAPIDS
NASHVILLE

T R E N TO N

BALTIMORE
K A N 8A8 CITY, KANS.

READING
SYRA C U SE
MILWAUKEE




LOUISVILLE

P L A T E No. 389

I. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES-AVERAGE ANNUAL INTEREST CHARGE PER HOME, FOR CITIES
HAVING, IN 1890, 100,000 INHABITANTS OR MORE: 1920 AND 1890.

2. OWNED MORTGAGED HOMES NOT ON FARM S-PER CENT OF TOTAL NUMBER AND TOTAL
VALUE IN EACH VALUE CLASS, FOR THE UNITED STATES: 1920 AND 1890.




VA LU E OF M O R T­
G A G ED H O M E

' 1920
1890
LE

68

TH A N

$ 2 .6 0 0 1

$ 2 ,6 0 0 T O

$ 6 ,0 0 0

$ 6 ,0 0 0 T O

, 920

$ 1 0 ,0 0 0

$ 1 0 ,0 0 0 T O $ 2 6 ,0 0 0

$ 2 6 ,0 0 0 A N D O V E R "

(4 3 3 )







STATISTICS OF STATES
PLATES 390-391

STATISTICS OF STATES.
T itle .

P late

P late

T itle .

No.

No.
fl.

2.

3.
390
4.

5.
6.

Revenue receipts and governmental-cost payments of
the 48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
Per cent distribution of revenue receipts o f the 48 states
from the several sources o f revenue for specified
years: 1915-1922.
Per capita revenue receipts, by principal classes, of the
48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
Per capita payments for principal general departmental
expenses of the 48 states for specified years: 1915­
1922.
Per cent distribution of governmental-cost payments
of the 48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
Per capita governmental-cost payments of the 48
states for specified years: 1915-1922.
(436)




1. Per cent distribution of principal general departmental
expenses of the 48 states for specified years: 1915­
1922.
2. Gross debt, at the close of the year, of the 48 states
for specified years: 1915-1922.
3. Per capita gross debt, at the close of the year, of the
48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
391
4. Per capita payments for specified general departmental
outlays of the 48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
5. Per capita sinking fund assets, at the close of the year,
of the 48 states for specified years: 1915-1922.
6. Per capita net debt, at the close o f the year, of the 48
.
states for specified years: 1915-1922.




1. REVENUE RECEIPTS AND GOVERNM ENTAL-COST PAYM ENTS OF THE 48
STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

4.

PER CAPITA PAYM EN TS FOR PR IN CIPAL GENERAL DEPA RTM EN TA L E X ­
PENSES OF THE 48 STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

H U N D R E D 8 OF M ILLIO NS OF DOLLAR8

1822

1919
1918

1917

1916
ED U C A TIO N

m
REVENUE RECEIPTS

GOVERNM ENTAL COST PAYMENTS

m zzm zm

EXPENSES INTEREST

|

OUTLAYS

2. PER CEN T DISTRIBUTION OF REVENUE RECEIPTS OF THE 48 STATES FROM
TH E SEVERAL SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

f "

71 C H A R ITIES. H OSPITALS. A N O C O R R E C TIO N S

G E N E R A L GOV E R N M E N T

u

«

B O S S H EA LTH A N O S A N IT A T IO N

PR O T E C T IO N T O PE R SO N A N D P R O P E R T Y

1916

R E CR E A TIO N

H .G H W A YS

A LL O THER

■ D E V E L O P M E N T A N D CONSERVATION OF N A T U R A L R E SO U R C E S

5.

PE R C E N T

PER CEN T DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENTAL-COST PAYM ENTS OF THE
48 STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.
PE R C ENT
10

20

SO__________ 40__________ 60__________ «0 __________ 70

’/ / / / / / / / / / / / / .
//////.

V ////Z

Y /////A

/////////.
f g g g G E N E R A L PR O P ER T Y T A X

SPECIAL T A X E S

3.

PER

CAPITA

W ////////A

SUBVENTIONS. GRANTS. GIFTS. ETC.

f e f e f f l ^ B U SIN E SS A N D NONBUS IN E S8 LIC E N SE S

V7A ‘c

g g g g g g ^ EARNINGS OF GENERAL DEPARTM ENTS
|

O THER REVENUES

REVENUE RECEIPTS, BY PRINCIPAL CLASSES, OF THE 48
6.
STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

PER CAPITA

GOVERNMENTAL-COST PAYM ENTS OF THE 48 STATES FOR
SPECIFIED YE A RS: 1915-1922.
DOLLARS

1922

< / / / / / / / / / .i i . hi
v z m s/ / / / / ,

1919

m ,

1
2

S

■
i

0
1922
1919

1918 \\\N \ s ' w

VS
YA

w w w w w w w w \Y/A

1917

19181

1916

1917

1915

KSSSGENERAL PROPERTY T A X

mm

1916
SUBVENTIONS. GRANTS. GIFTS. ETC.

g ^ » S BUSINES8 AN O N ONBUSINESS LICEN SES

EARNINGS

V 2 A

OTHER REVENUES

SPECIAL TAXES

1916

m

\ \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \

w

/

/

OF GENERAL DEPARTM ENTS
S

8

8

E XPENSES

IN T E R E S T

Z 0 Z I OUTLAYS

(4 3 7 )

P L A T E No. 390

P L A T E No. 391

I. PER
<438)

DEPARTM EN TAL 4.
1915-1922.

PER CAPITA PAYMENTS FOR SPECIFIED GENERAL DEPARTM EN TAL OUT­
LAYS OF THE 48 STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

y///////////////////////$^>^ n111

1919

V / //// ///// //// //// /Z .

1918

' V / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / - M i ____

1917

■ / g y M y a v / M v y z / ^ & u

DOLLARS

_____ il

u

,

1916

iill I

1915
(% % % % ) e d u c a t i o n

h ig h w a y s

PROTECT ION TO PERSON A N O P R O P E R T Y

[

j c H A R IT IE S . H OSPITALS. A N D C O R R EC TIO N S

H EALTH A N O SA N ITA TIO N
J ^ I U

RE C R EA TION

GENERAL G O V E R N M E N T

f

j A LL O THER

( ■ ■ ^ ^ D E V E L O P M E N T ANO CONSERVATION OF N A T U R A L R E SO U R C E S

5.
2. GROSS DE B T, A T TH E CLOSE OF TH E YE A R, OF TH E 48 STATES FOR SPECI­
FIED YEARS: 1915-1922.

PER CAPITA SINKING-FUND ASSETS, A T TH E CLOSE OF THE YE A R, OF THE
48 STATES FOR SPECIFIED YE A RS: 1915-1922.
DOLLARS

0
HUNDREDS OF MILLION8 OF DOLLARS

I

>

1022
1019
1918
1017

1918
1016

3.

PER CAPITA GROSS DEBT, A T TH E CLOSE OF TH E YEAR, OF T H E 48 STATES
FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.
0...................... 3
___________

4
______ __

DOLLARS

«

______

I_____________IQ
n
w /M m m ■

i

!

1




1922

CENT DISTRIBUTION OF PRINCIPAL GENERAL
EXPENSES OF THE 48 STATES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS:

I

1

1

6.

PER CAPITA NET DEBT, A T TH E CLOSE OF THE YE A R, OF TH E 48 STATES
FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1915-1922.
O

I

3

1

DOLLARS
4-

6

•

7

•




STATISTICS OF CITIES
PLATES 392-395

STATISTICS OF CITIES.
T itle.
P late

P la te

No.

392

393

394

Location of cities in the United States having a popula­
tion of over 30,000 at the middle of the fiscal year 1922.
1. Population in cities having a population of over 30,000
and outside such cities for specified years: 1790-1922.
2. Per cent of total population in cities having a popula­
tion of over 30,000 and per cent outside such cities
for specified years: 1790-1922.
3. Net revenue receipts and net governmental-cost pay­
ments of 146 cities for specified years: 1903-1922.
4. Per capita net payments for governmental-costs, by
principal classes, of 146 cities for specified years:
1903-1922.
1. Per capita net revenue receipts, by principal classes,
of 146 cities for specified years: 1903-1922.
2. Per cent distribution of net revenue receipts of 146
cities from the several sources of revenue for specified
years: 1903-1922.
3. Per cent distribution of net governmental-cost pay­
ments of 146 cities for specified years: 1903-1922.
4. Per capita net payments for principal general depart­
mental expenses of all cities of over 30,000 inhabit­
ants for specified years: 1903-1922.
(440)




T

it l e .

No.

ggg

1. Per cent distribution of principal general departmental
expenses of all cities of over 30,000 inhabitants for
specified years: 1903-1922.
2. Per capita gross debt, at the close of the year, of 146
cities for specified years: 1903-1922.
3. Per capita net indebtedness, at the close of the year,
of 146 cities for specified years: 1903-1922.
4. Per capita payments for principal general departmental
outlays of all cities of over 30,000 inhabitants for
specified years: 1903-1922.
5. Gross debt, at the close of the year, of 146 cities for
specified years: 1903-1922.
6. Per capita sinking fund assets, at the close of the year,
.
of 146 cities for specified years: 1903-1922.




LOCATION OF CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES HAVING A POPULATION OF OVER 30,000 AT THE MIDDLE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 1922.

(441)

P L A T E No. 392

P L A T E No. 393

I. POPULATION IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF OVER 30,000
A N D OUTSIDE SUCH CITIE S FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1790-1922.

mm,
mm•mmm m .mm,W M m
mmm m m

M IL L IO N S

1810
1900
1890
1880
1870
I8 6 0
I8 6 0
1840
1830
1820

PER C EN T

1922
1920
1910
1900

mm mm.

vazzaza mm
W ,WM,
/M
WM 3
W/MW ,ft
/M
WM
A
wm V
mm

i

1890
1880
1870
I860

•am

' 7 o T IE S
7.

w MAk

1850
1840
1830
1820
1810

W IT H 3 0 , 0 0 0 OR M O R E P O P U L A T IO N

P U L A T IO N O U T S ID E 8 U C H C IT IE S

1800

1790

7 7 7 7 ? ,’ 7 JA /A .W /SAIM .
7
T 7 7 7 7 r z /y y .7 7 7 7 * 7 Jcm W /M H
jz jz z Y A
fr a a a
W M

M
’
m
W
W
m m ............. - m m .vam / a a W
m m .m m W /7 .VAAAAAAY W
*77SJ
ZZZZZZZ/. W
WZZZZa
V /Z m m .
y /M z 'W
Y /A V % W /. m m '/A
...............
w
/.YaaaaaZ /•m
■
' //////, ' /////////' ////////. ' //////// ■ m m y /m /.m
w m .
W W M W M W M W M W M
im
m w /w .’ W /.w m .'W M
M

1'///
/////..

C E N T O U T S ID E S U C H C IT IE 8

QF

4.

200

400

600

M IL L IO N S
D O LLAR S
800
1.080
1.200

1.400

1.800

1.800

PER CAPITA NET PAYM EN TS FOR GOVERNMENTAL-COSTS, BY PRINCIPAL
C U S S E S , OF 146 CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.

'/ / / / / / / / / / / / /

B e g g
t-

(442)




2.000

E X P E N 8 E 6 OF G E N E R A L D E P A R TM E N T S
1 E X P E N 8 E 8 OF P U B L IC 8 E R V IC E E N T E R P R IS E S

|IN T E R E S T

B s s a ou tla v*

»oo

aaaaAaAXm

m
•zm z> .m m .

w m .
,
,vaaaaZZa m m vzaZZAa.
y /Z /A •W M y//Z M
y /A
W M \r z Z /fc
YAAaZZZa W M ,\zzZ /% k
aa
.VaaaaZZa W M V /M l
/.’ m / / / / / / / / S /M
/m
W M M M .
W
’ M mm W M
M
W M ’ m W M

•

C E N T I N C IT IE 8 W IT H 8 0 , 0 0 0 OR M O R E P O P U L A T IO N

N ET REVENUE RECEIPTS AND NET GOVERNMENTAL-COST PAYMENTS
OF 146 CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.
0

ID

'

fS S S A P E R
Y/AAAAZA P E R

3.

W
m
/A
M
M
M
/M
M
m
m

||i§
HIs HI m 5
I 1 1
1 .1.1

z

1810
1800

20________________ 4 0 _________________ 60_________________80
/ / / / /

0

i

1920

6 0 ........................... 8 0 .............................100

mm.WM
7 7 . 7 7' 77/7 7 WM,
Z 77 7 .7 ' 7 /
1
WM.'MM
’ 77/7 7 .' 7 77 7 WM
7
2 77 7 7 V
/M W ,
3
V 7 . 7 7 YVA V /M V P• M
7 77 7 1
' 7 ////it MM WM’ M,'MMf m,
7 7
w
W
’
' 7 / 7M7,WW,W
77
/MmmWM,ft

1 1

1922

III

o ________________ 2 0 ________________4 0

2. PER CEN T OF TOTAL POPULATION IN CITIES HAVING A
POPULATION OF OVER 30,000 A N D PER CEN T OUTSIDE SUCH
CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1790-1922.




3.

1. PER CAPITA NET REVENUE RECEIPTS, BY PRINCIPAL CLASSES, OF 146
CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.

PER CEN T DISTRIBUTION OF NET GOVERNM ENTAL-COST PAYM EN TS OF
146 CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.
70

SO

100

m y///////////

x \\\\\\\\\\\\\x x x y s x ^ x x x x x x x x
xX xX xX X X X X X X X ^ X X X x xN x X X X ^ T X S S X X
19 16

80

'/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / A

//////////////.
///////////tozz.

X X X T v X v X X X X 'X ^ T X ^ X X X T T X X T ^
n v
X X

^ ^ X n X X ^ X ^ X x T x 'X X X
X
X
X

XX\X^X^TTX>XXXTXXX\XXn
X

////////////////z
'/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

x
x

Y ////////////////Z
'/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

X X < X ^ X ^ X X 'X X X \ - X < X ^ S X T T ^ X >

S9 S

B3SS

GENERAL PROPERTY TAX

I S S t i j i OTHER TAXES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

Y////////////////Z

x X \ X x X \ X x X < X < X X \ X ^ < X ^ X ^ X X \ X 'X

//////////////////

| SUBVENTIONS. GRANTS. GIFTS, ETC.
J
^ PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISES

P B B B 8

EXPENSE.

V M i i i i i A INTEREST

i z s s z

OUTLAYS

Mo t h e r r e v e n u e s

2. PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF NET REVENUE RECEIPTS OF 146 CITIES
FROM TH E SEVERAL SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR SPECIFIED YEARS:
1903-1922.

4.
-

PER CAPITA NET PAYMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL GENERAL DEPARTM EN TAL
EXPENSES OF ALL CITIES OF OVER 30,000 IN HABITANTS FOR SPECIFIED
YEARS: 1903-1922.

1919

Z////////////A

1917

'///Z///////M

1915

V////////ZS®».

1913 !/ / / / / / / / / $&

&

1911

Z/////////W&

1909

/////////& % &

1907

/ / / / / // / // & &

1906

z///////y$$&>

1903

V Z / z EDUCATION
PROTECTION TO PERSON AND PROPERTY

(JGENERAL
V

/ Z

8P E C IA L A S S E S SM E N T S

GOVERNMENT

| HIGHW AYS

m

HEALTH AND SANITATION
CHARITIES. HOSPITALS. AND CORRECTIONS
I R E C R E A T IO N
I all o th er

l 4431

P L A T E No. 394

I. PER C EN T DISTRIBUTION OF PRINCIPAL GENERAL D E PARTM EN TAL EXPENSES
OF ALL CITIES OF OVER 30,000 IN H ABITANTS FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.

P L A T E No. 395

4.

PER CAPITA PAYMENTS FOR PR IN C IPA L GENERAL DEPARTM EN TAL OUTLAYS OF
ALL CITIES OF OVER 30.000 IN HABITANTS FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922

(4 4 4 1



ED U C A TIO N

^

PR O T EC T IO N TO^ P E ^ S O N ^

^ ^ ^ C H A R I T I E 8 . H OSPITALS. A N D C O R R EC TIO N S

J Q Q jjH E A L T H

A N D SA N IT A T IO N

■ GENERAL GOVERNM ENT

^

^

H IGH W AYS

^ ^ ^ ^ R E C R E A T IO N

■

*

5. GROSS DEBT, A T THE CLOSE OF THE YE A R , OF 146 CITIES FOR
SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.

'

2. PER CAPITA GROSS DEBT. A T TH E CLOSE OF TH E YE A R, OF 146 CITIES
FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.
0

M

40

I'

DOLLARS
SO

1919
1917
1916
1913
191 I
1909
1907
1906
1903

m z.
zm
■m z, v////wmrkvm. ■m ztyzm .
W /M W 'l
w / tm m .
m m m t.
w /Am m i a
m m m .
m ztyn m m

ia

WW< w m m w ,
W M 'WM v m
WM WM
•m z ’ b
M

1922

m
M
|

6. PER CAPITA SIN K IN G FUND ASSETS, A T TH E CLOSE OF THE YEAR
OF 146 CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YE A RS: 1903-1922.
3.

PER CAPITA N ET INDEBTEDNESS, A T THE CLOSE OF TH E YE A R . OF 146
CITIES FOR SPECIFIED YEARS: 1903-1922.
DOLLARS

HUNDRED8 OF MILLION8 OF DOLLARS




VITAL STATISTICS
PLATES 396-412

VITAL STATISTICS.
P late

T it l e .

No.

396

397
398

399

400

401

402

403

404

'1. Annual birth rates per 1,000 population,-by months, in
the registration area: 1918-1922.
2. Births, by color, and for white children by parent
nativity, in the registration area: 1922.
3. Births in the registration area of white children of
known parentage having at least one parent foreign
.
born: 1922.
Growth of the registration area for births: 1915-1922
(map).
Growth of the registration area for deaths: 1880-1922
(map).
1. Per cent which the population and land area of the
registration area formed o f the total population and
land area of the United States for the years 1880,
1890, and 1900 to 1922, inclusive.
2. Per cent of deaths in the registration area (exclusive of
Hawaii) by color, by nativity of white persons, and
by parent nativity of the native white: 1922.
3. Number of deaths in the registration area (exclusive of
Hawaii) at all ages, under 1 year of age, and from 1
to 4 years of age, for each of the years 1900 to 1922.
4. Per cent of deaths in the registration area (exclusive
of Hawaii) under 1 year of age, from 1 to 4 years,
and5yearsand over, for each of the years 1900tol922.
General death rates of the United States (registration
area) and certain foreign countries for each of the
years from 1900 to 1922.
Death rates from certain important causes of death in the
registration area of the United States for the years
1900 and 1910 to 1922.
1. Death rates from all causes per 1,000 population in the
registration states of 1910: 1910 and 1920.
2. Death rates from typhoid fever per 100,000 population
.
in the registration states of 1910: 1910 and 1920.
1. Death rates from measles per 100,000 population in the
registration states of 1910: 1910 and 1920.
2. Death rates from scarlet fever per 100,000 population
in the registration states of 1910: 1910 and 1920.
1. Death rates from whooping cough per 100,000 popu­
lation in the registration states of 1910: 1910 and
1920.
2. Death rates from diphtheria and croup per 100,000
population in the registration states of 1910: 1910
and 1920.
(446)




P late

405

406

407

408

409

410

411
412

T it l e .

Death rates from influenza per 100,000 population in
the registration states of 1910: 1910 and 1920.
Death rates from tuberculosis o f the lungs per 100,000
population in the registration states of 1910: 1910
and 1920.
Death rates from all other forms of tuberculosis per
100.000 population in the registration states of 1910:
1910 and 1920.
Death rates from cancer and other malignant tumors
per 100,000 population in the registration states o f
1910: 1910 and 1920.
Death rates from diabetes per 100,000 population in
the registration states o f 1910: 1910 and 1920.
Death rates from cerebral hemorrhage and softening
per 100,000 population in the registration states o f
1910: 1910 and 1920.
Death rates from organic diseases of the heart per
100.000 population in the registration states of 1910:
1910 and 1920.
2. Death rates from pneumonia (all forms) per 100,000
population in the registration states of 1910: 1910
and 1920.
Death rates from diarrhea and enteritis per 100,000
population in the registration states of 1910: 1910
and 1920.
2 . Death rates from acute nephritis and Bright’s disease
per 100,000 population in the registration states of
1910: 1910 and 1920.
Death rates from puerperal septicemia per 100,000
female population in the registration states of 1910:
1910 and 1920.
2 . Death rates from all other puerperal causes per 100,000
female population in the registration states of 1910:
1910 and 1920.
3. Death rates from violent deaths (suicide excepted) per
100.000 population in the registration states of 1910:
1910 and 1920.
Infant mortality, by country of birth of mother, in the
registration area: 1922.
Infant mortality, by country of birth of mother, in the
registration area: 1922.

P L A T E No. 396

1. ANNUAL BIRTH RATES PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY MONTHS, IN THE REGISTRATION AREA: 1918-1922.

§

£

D

a.
o.
0

x
U
J
0.
Ui
I<
X

I
h
x

2. BIRTHS, BY COLOR, AND FOR W H ITE CHILDREN BY PAREN T NA­ 3. BIRTHS IN THE REGISTRATION AREA OF W H ITE CHILDREN OF KNOWN
TIV ITY , IN THE REGISTRATION AREA: 1922.
PARENTAGE HAVING A T LEAST ONE PAREN T FOREIGN BORN: 1922.




COUNTRY OF BIRTH
OF MOTHER
U N IT E D STATES

va/z /////////////////////////////////////////////////////

ITALY
AUSTRIA AND
HUNGARY
Po l a n d
R u s s ia
CANADA

F A T H E R N A T IV E

IRELANO

F A T H E R O T H E R F O R E IG N

E N O LAN O .S C O TLA ND .
AND WALES

FA TH E R

SAME AS M O T H E R

FA TH E R

F O R E IG N

DENM ARK. NORWAY.
ANO SWEDEN

'///A

GERMANY
OTHER FOREIGN

(447)

P L A T E No. 397

' sH -)

GROWTH OF THE REGISTRATION AREA FOR BIRTHS: 1915-1922.




W Z&
O R IG IN A L R E G IS T R A T IO N S T A T E S . 1915

S T A T E S A D D E D S IN C E 1915

S T A T E S N O T IN R E G IS T R A T IO N A R E A




P L A T E No. 398

GROWTH OF THE REGISTRATION AREA FOR DEATHS: 1880-1922.

*

<^
g

^

H A W A II

1917

O R IG IN A L

R E G IS T R A T IO N

S T A T E S , 19 0 0

STA TES ADDED

S IN C E

19 0 0

S T A T E S N O T IN R E G IS T R A T IO N

AREA

P L A T E No. 399

2.
i. PER CENT W HICH THE POPULATION A N D LAND AREA OF THE PER CENT OF DEATHS IN TH E REGISTRATION AREA (EXCLUSIVE
REGISTRATION ARE A FORMED OF TH E TO TAL POPULATION AND OF H AW AII) B Y COLOR, B Y N A TIV ITY OF W H ITE PERSONS, AND BY
LAND AREA OF THE U N ITED STATES FOR TH E YEARS 1880, 1890, AND PAREN T N ATIV ITY OF THE NATIVE W H ITE: 1922.
1900 TO 1922, INCLUSIVE.

O

1
0

ir //a

3.

'S
O

POPULATION

30

6
«
0

pen C N
T

* CENSUS YEAR

J
O

'80

70

W

V////A LAND AREA

NUMBER OF DEATHS IN THE REGISTRATION AREA (EXCLUSIVE OF4. PER CEN T OF DEATHS IN TH E REGISTRATION AREA (EXCLUSIVE OF
HAW AII) UN DER I YEAR OF AGE, FROM I TO 4 YEARS, AND 5 YEARS
H A W A ID A T ALLAGES, UNDER 1 YEAR OF AGE, AND FROM I TO 4 YEARS
AND OVER, FOR EACH OF THE YEARS 1900 TO 1922.
OF AGE, FOR EACH OF THE YEARS 1900 TO 1922.
THOUSANDS

PCN CENT

4

__ zzzzzzzz_
Z
ZzzZ 5 5K
Z
_
H Z1zzY /A _ ' _ zz _ zz “ zz_ 1 p
ZZZ Z
zz_
z I 1
E uZ
zzzz zz
~~ ! l3 2! : zzZI— zz=
zz
zz1
'ZI
zz ' 13 5vz,\
Z
zz
'
zz 1 ZW &
Z] Z
zz
'zzzz— '3 E
'
zzzzzzZa/A
Y
__ zzzz
zzzzzz
zzzzzzTSflT
'
zzzzzz
zzzzz z tt a
zz
z //
'
zz
zzzzzz V /A
S
zzzz
zzzzzz S4 Z__ zzzz
zz
. .z
—z
lr/s
zz'
zzzzzz
zzzzzz v A
zzzzzz—
1
zzzzzz JV A
S
zz
zz
zz:
1
_
zz
z
zzzzzz V//A
zzzz
‘ zz
]z
zzzzzz
zz
z
zz ' zz
zzzzzz
zz
zz 1
zzzz
” ]zz 1
zz zz
zzzzzz
zz 1 ‘■_
'zzzz ' 3 ' zz
zz zz
zzzzzz
z
1
zz;z zz — . 'zzzzzz
z
zzzzzz□ SK
2
zzzzzzE 3 5S 5 __ zz zz —* zz
zz =
'
__zzzzzzzz
• 'W itmv////1
1901 lZzzzz W/M
.
_
zz—
Z
H zzzz
Z
——
___ zzE
; 'zzzz
cz zzI 1 ___ 1 1 1

1922
1921

1920
1919
1918

1917
1 9 )6

1916
(9 1 4

1913
1912
191 I

1910
1909

1908
(9 0 7

1906

1906

1904
1903
1902

z

1900

UNOCA I YEAA

y

/ /

UNOER I YEAR

(4 5 0 )




6 YEARS AND OVER

YY/A

I TO 4 TtAW*

1

U

4X0 ovea

P L A T E No. 400

G E N ER A L DEATH RA TES OF T H E U N ITED STA T ES (REG ISTRATIO N AREA) AND CERTA IN FOREIGN COU NTRIES FOR
EACH OF TH E Y EA RS FROM 1900 TO 1922.




YEAR S

(45 1 )

P L A T E No. 401

DEATH RA TES FROM CERTAIN IM PORTANT CAUSES OF DEATH IN TH E REGISTRATIO N AREA OF TH E U N ITED STA T ES

D E A T H R A T E PER 100.000 P O P U L A T IO N

IN T H E

R E G IS T R A T IO N A R E A

FOR TH E Y EA RS 1900 AND 1910 TO 1922.

(452)




P L A T E No. 402

1. DEATH RATES FROM ALL CAUSES PER 1,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.

MALES

FEMALES

AOE PERIODS

AGE PERIODS

2. DEATH RATES FROM TYPHOID FEVER PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.




MALES
AOE PERIODS

FEMALES
age

PERIODS

(4 5 3 )

PLATE No. 403

1. DEATH RATES FROM MEASLES PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
FEMALES

MALES
AGE PERIODS

AGE PERIOD3

2. DEATH RATES FROM SCARLET FEVER PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.

MALES
UNDER

|

I

TO

6

TO

FEMALES

to

AGE PERI0D3
19
20
26
06

49

96

69

AGE PERIODS
19
20
29
89

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

(454)




TO

TO

TO

79 YEARS
AND

UN DER

I

I

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

49

69

09

TO

TO

T9 YEARS
AN D

P L A T E No. 404

I. DEATH RATES FROM WHOOPING COUGH PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
MALES
UNDER
1

YEAR

1
TO
4

6
TO
S

10
70
14

15
TO
10

FEMALES

AGE PERIO DS

AQE PERIODS

20
TO
24

26
TO
34

38
TO
44

46
TO
64

Y
ttl 76ANEARS
O
> TC> OV ER
1

61
TC
6 1

7

400

400

—

360

360

300

Z

o
260

<

260

o
a

i
t

j

j

f

i

200 1.

I

\\

44—
o
\\
O 200
\\
8
\\
©
*
\\
2 tso — rr
s
*
u
100

I
<

-

i

q!

150

ju

100

V
60

60

\

O

2. DEATH RATES FROM DIPHTHERIA AND CROUP PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.

MALES
UNDER

I




FEMALES

AQE PERIODS
16
20
26
S5

AQE PERIODS
|6
20
28
36

66

66

78 YEARS

UNDER

I

68 76 YEARS

(4 5 5 i

PLATE No. 405

1, DEATH RATES FROM INFLUENZA PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
FEMALES

MALES

15

I

I

TO

TO

20

25

TO

TO

48
TO

55

66 76YEAR8

TO

TO

TO

UNDER

I

I

TO

6
16
TP 10 TO
TO

AGE PERIODS
25
20
as
TO

TO

TO

4STO

65
TO

as -75YEARS
TO

AND

PER 100.000 POPULATION

UNDER

AGE PERIODS

2. DEATH RATES FROM TUBERCULOSIS OF THE LUNGS PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.

MALES

FEMALES
* QE PERI0D*

PER 100,000 POPULATION

PER 100,000 POPULATION

AGE PERIODS

( 4561




P L A T E No. 406

1. DEATH RATES FROM ALL OTHER FORMS OF TUBERCULOSIS PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
MALES

FEMALES

AGE PERIODS

AGE PERIODS

2. DEATH RATES FROM CANCER AND OTHER MALIGNANT TUMORS PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910:1910 AND 1920.

MALES
UNDER 1
TO
1
YEAR 4

FEMALES
AGE PERIODS

6

10

AGE PERIODS
S
O
89
38
16

48

68

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

9

14

19

94

94

44

64

64




68 T$YEARS
AND
74 OVER

TO

(4r>7»

PLATE No. 407

I. DEATH RATES FROM DIABETES PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
MALES

FEMALES

AGE PERIODS

AGE PERIOD8

2. DEATH RATES FROM CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE AND SOFTENING PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910:1910 AND 1920.

FEMALES

MALES
AGE PERIODS

(45 8 )




AGE PERIODS

PLATE No. 408

I. DEATH RATES FROM ORGANIC DISEASES OF THE HEART PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920,

FEMALES
AGE PERIODS

P6R 100 000 POPULATION

MALES
AOE PERIODS

M R 1 00 ,000 POPULATION

2. DEATH RATES FROM PNEUMONIA (ALL FORMS) PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910:1910 AND 1920.




(4 5 9 )

PLATE No. 409

I. DEATH RATES FROM DIARRHEA AND ENTERITIS PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910:1910 AND 1920.
MALE®

FEMALES
AOE PEB,0D8

P6R 100,000 POPULATION

AGE PERIODS

2. DEATH RATES FROM ACUTE NEPHRITIS AND BRIGHT’S DISEASE PER 100,000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
MALES

r4 i
fin




FEMALES

PLATE No. 410

I. DEATH RATES FROM PUERPERAL SEPTICEMIA PER 100,000 FEMALE
POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
FEM ALES

2. DEATH RATES FROM ALL OTHER PUERPERAL CAUSES PER 100,000
FEMALE POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910
AND 1920.
FEM A LES

A G E P E R IO D S

A G E P E R IO D S
IS
TO

20
TO

25
TO

30
TO

35
TO

40
TO

45 YEAR S

IS
YEARS

19

24

29

34

39

44

OVER

AND

PER 100.000 POPULATION

UNDER

. DEATH RATES FROM VIOLENT DEATHS (SUICIDE EXCEPTED) PER 100.000 POPULATION IN THE REGISTRATION STATES OF 1910: 1910 AND 1920.
FEM A LES

MALES

A G E P E R IO D S

A G E P E R IO D S
6

10

15

20

26

4$

55

65

TO

TO

TO

T
O

36

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

4

9

14

19

24

34

44

64

64

74

PER

100.000 POPULATION

1
TO

7L-::

LIV




-3(1

I4H1 I

75YEAR 3
AND
OVER

PLATE No. 411

INFANT MORTALITY, BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH OF MOTHER, IN THE REGISTRATION AREA: 1922.
U N DER
2
MONTHS

UNDER
3
MONTHS

UNDER
6
MONTHS

UNDER
•
MONTHS

UNDER
12
MONTHS

PCATH9 PER 1,000 &IRTM9

UNDER
1
M ONTH

(462)




PLATE No. 412

INFANT MORTALITY, BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH OF MOTHER, IN THE REGISTRATION AREA: 1922.




U N DE R
3
M ONTHS

U N DER
3
MONTHS

U N DE R
6
M ONTHS

UNDER
S
M ONTHS

UNDER
12
MONTHS

D E A T H 8 PER 1.000 B IR T H 8

UNDER
>
M O N TH

DAYS

W EEK

WEEKS

W EEKS

M ONTH

(463)




INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
A c q u isitio n s o f te rrito ry . S ee U n ite d States, etc.
plate X o.
Acreage, average, o f a ll la n d per fa rm , b y states:
1910.........
243
1920.............
243
------- average, o f im p ro v e d la n d per fa rm , b y states: 1920. 244
A cu te n e p h ritis an d B r ig h t’s disease. S ee D e a th rates.
Age and sex, d is trib u tio n b y single years of, fo r th e to ta l
p o p u la tio n : 1920____________
190
Age periods and sex, d is trib u tio n fo r certain p rin c ip a l
p o p u la tio n classes b y : 1920____________________________
192
------- d is trib u tio n fo r to ta l p o p u la tio n and fo r certain
p rin c ip a l p o p u la tio n classes b y : 1920__________________
191
------- m a rita l c o n d itio n o f p o p u la tio n 15 years o f age and
over fo r p rin c ip a l p o p u la tio n classes b y : 1920_________ 193
A g ric u ltu ra l pro du cts, centers o f : 18 50-1920____________
137
------- value of, b y states: 1920________________
252
A g ric u ltu re and p o p u la tio n , pe r cent o f increase in : 1910­
1920_______________________ __________ ________ _________ 242
A laska, nu m be r and d is trib u tio n of In d ia n s, b y lin g u is tic
sto ck: 1920_____________________________________________ 186
------- p e r cent o f In d ia n s in to ta l p o p u la tio n , b y ju d ic ia l
187
d is tric ts : 1920_________
------- p o p u la tio n , b y ju d ic ia l d is tric ts :
1920_____________
61
Area, center of, center o f p o p u la tio n , and m edian lines:
1920, and m edian p o in t: 1880-1920___________________
122
------- o rigin al.
S ee U n ite d States, etc.
S ee a lso L a n d area.
A u s tria and H u n g a ry , d is trib u tio n of foreign w h ite stock

originating in, by states: 1920 and 1910_____________
Automobiles, number of, on farms: 1920____ __________
Barley, production of, 10 leading states: 1919 and 1909..
Birth rates, annual, per 1,000 population, by months, in
the registration area: 1918-1922____________________
Births, by color, and for white children by parent na­
tivity, in the registration area: 1922___ ____________
------growth of registration area for: 1915-1922________
in the registration area of white children of known
parentage having at least one parent foreign born: 1922
Bright’s disease. S e e Death rates.
Buckwheat, production of, 5 leading states: 1919 and
1909---------- ---------- ----------------------- ------- --------------Butter made on farms and in factories: 1879-1919_____
Calves raised on farms, by states: 1919________________
Canada and Newfoundland, distribution of foreign white
stock originating in, by states: 1920 and 1910......... ..
------distribution of natives of, by states: 1920..................
Cancer. Se e Death rates.
Cattle, beef, on farms, January 1 , 1920________________
Celtic. See English, etc.
Center, agricultural products. See Centers of population,
etc.
—— cotton production: 1859, 1879, 1906, 1910, 1912,
1914, 1916, 1918, 1919, and 1922______________ _____
------farms. See Centers of population, etc.
------manufactures. See Centers of population, etc.




207
272
281
396
396
397
396
281
277
278
208
202
273

363

Center of population:
P late N o .
January 1, 1920_____________ ;______________________ 120
States: 1880, 1890, 1900, 1910, an d 1 9 2 0 -

P late No.

A la ba m a___________
A riz o n a ____________
Arkansas___________
C a lifo rn ia __________
C olorado___________
C o n n e cticu t________
Delaw are___________
D is tric t o f C o lu m b ia
F lo rid a _____________
. G eorgia____________
Id a h o ______________
Illin o is _____________
In d ia n a ____________
Io w a _______________
Kansas_______ ______
K e n tu c k y __________
L o u isia n a . 1-----------M a in e ______________
M a ry la n d __________
Massachusetts_____
M ic h ig a n ___________
M in ne sota_________
M ississipp i_________
M is s o u ri___________ _
M o n ta n a ___________

123
123
123
124
125
125
125
125
125
125
126
126
127
127
128
128
128
128
128
128
129
129
130
130
130

N ebraska___________ 131
N e v a d a .___________
131
N ew H a m p sh ire ____ 132
N ew Jersey_________ 132
N ew M e xico _______
133
N ew Y o rk __________
132
N o rth C a ro lin a _____ 133
N o rth D a k o ta ______ 133
O hio________________
133
133
O klah om a__________
O regon_____________
133
P e n nsylvania_______
134
Rhode Is la n d ______
134
South C a ro lin a _____
134
South D a k o ta ______
134
Tennessee_____________ 135
Texas_______________
135
135
U ta h _______________
V e rm o n t_____ '_____
135
V irg in ia ------------------135
W ashing to n________
136
W est V irg in ia ______
136
W isconsin__________
136
136
W y o m in g ----------------

— center o f area, and m edian lines: 1920, and m edian

point: 1880-1920__________________________________ 122
------total, native white, foreign-born, negro, urban, and
rural______________________________________________ 121
Centers, geographic__________________________________ 138
Centers of population: 1790—
1920, and centers of farms,
agricultural products, and manufactures: 1850-1920.. 137 \
Cereals, center of: 1900-1920_________________________ 137
Cerebral hemorrhage and softening. See Death rates.
Children of each sex 10 to 15 years of age, proportion of,
engaged in gainful occupations: 1880-1920----------------- 225
------ proportion of, engaged in gainful occupations, by
states, arranged by geographic divisions: 1920 and 1910. 226
Cities, total population of great cities at each census:
1790-1920________
146
Cities having a population of over 30,000 and outside such
cities for specified years, population in: 1790-1922— 393
Cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more in 1920, popula­
tion of: 1920 and 1910_____________________________ 143
Cities in the United States having a population of over
30,000 at the middle of the fiscal year 1922, location of. 392
Cities of 100,000 inhabitants or more, per cent of total
population born in state of residence, born in other
states, or foreign born, for:
1910__________________________________ _________ 200
1920_________________ __________________________ 200
' Se e also Revenue receipts and payments, etc.
•

(465)

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

466

P late N o .

C itize n sh ip , fo re ig n w h ite m en 21 years o f age and over
b o rn in specified cou ntrie s o r groups o f cou ntrie s: 1920_ 212
------- fo re ig n w h ite persons b o rn in specified countries or
groups o f co u n trie s: 1920______________________________
212
------- fo re ig n w h ite wom en 21 years o f age and over b o rn
in specified cou ntrie s o r groups o f countries: 1920-----212
C oal, a n th ra c ite and b itu m in o u s :
A n n u a l p ro d u c tio n : 1889-1919_______________________ 358
C o m p a ra tive p ro d u c tio n , b y decades: 1829-1919-----357
C o al fields o f th e U n ite d S tates: 1919___________________ 355.
C o lo r an d n a t iv it y o f fa rm e r, nu m b e r o f farm s— per cent
d is trib u tio n b y , b y sta te s :
1910___________________________
263
1920________________________________________ J________
263
C o lo r o r race, n a tiv ity , and p a re n ta g e :
B y d ivisio n s: 1920, 1910, an d 1900__________________
143
B y states: 1920 an d 1910____________________________ 153
F o r cities h a vin g , in 1920,100,000 in h a b ita n ts o r m o re :
1920 and 1910______________________________________ 155
C olored fa rm te n a n ts and owners in th e S outh, b y age:
1920_____________________________________________________ 264
Colored farm ers, p e r cent d is trib u tio n b y tenure, b y
states: 1920-------------------------------------------------------------------- 260
------- per cent o f a ll fa rm la n d operated b y , b y sta te s :
1910----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ 266
1920___________________ ________ ______________________
266
------- p e r cent o f a ll fa rm s operated b y , b y cou ntie s: 1920. .
265
------- p e r c en t o f fa rm la n d operated b y ten ants, b y states:
1920_____________________________________________________ 262
------- p e r cent o f im p ro v e d fa rm la n d operated b y, b y
states:
1910__________________________________________________
267
1920 __________________________________________________
267
-------p e r cen t o p e ra tin g re n te d farm s, b y states: 1920—
261
C olored farm ers in th e S outh, p e r cent d is trib u tio n , b y
te n u re : 1900-1920______________________________________
260
C o op erative o rganizations, sales and purchases b y farm ers
th ro u g h , 20 le a d in g sta te s : 1919----------------------------------- 271
C opper, a n d lead and zinc p ro d u cin g lo c a litie s : 1 9 1 9 ----- 361
C o rn p ro d u c tio n :
C e nter o f: 1850-1920________________________________
137
I n 1919_______________________________________________
283
I n th e U n ite d S tates: 1849-1919-------------------------------- 281
20 le a d in g sta te s: 1919 and 1909------------------------------- 281
C o tto n , area and y ie ld o f : 1893-1922------------------------------- 370
------- dom estic, exports of, b y specified cou ntrie s an d b y
m o n th s: Septem ber, 1912, to J u ly , 1923----------------------374
------- p ro p o rtio n o f w o rld ’s m ill s u p p ly of, c o n trib u te d b y
each c o u n try : 1922--------------------------------------------------------- 362
C o tto n consumed, b y m o n th s : Septem ber, 1912, to J u ly ,
1923--------------------371
C o tto n con sum p tion, p ro p o rtio n o f to ta l, b y countries
(year e n ding J u ly 31, 1923)-------------------------------------------- 362
C o tto n ginned, b y counties, 1922—
P la te N o .

A la b a m a _____ ____
__
Arkansas —
____
F lo rid a ______
...
G eo rg ia-------____
L o u is ia n a ..
M ississip p i— _____

364
365
366
367
366
364

C o tto n ginn ing s to specified dates:

.
_
_
_
.

368
365
367
368
369

1905—
1922___________

370

N o rth C a rolina . . .
O kla h o m a . . _
S outh C a ro lin a ___
Tennessee _______
Texas. .
___

C o tto n im p o rts , b v m o n th s: Septem ber, 1912, to J u ly ,
1923_____________
C o tto n p ro d u c tio n :
C e nter o f: 1 8 50 -192 0.-----------------------------------------------C e nter o f: 1859, 1879, 1906, 1910, 1912, 1914, 1916,
1918, 1919, and 1922--------------------------------------------




373
137
363

Cotton production—Continued.
Plate no.
15 leading states: 1919 and 1909-------------------------- 282
In 1919_________________________________________ 286
In specified years: 1790-1922------------------------------- 362
In the United States: 1849-1919__________________ 282
Per cent grown in each state: 1922_______________ 369
Cotton stocks, by months: September, 1912, to July, 1923. 372
Cotton-producing area of the United States in 1922, and
center of production: 1859, 1879, 1906, 1910, 1912,
1914, 1916, 1918, 1919, and 1922________________ 363
Counties in which population decreased:
1880-1920_______________________________________ 11
1910-1920_______________________________________ 11
Cows. Se e Dairy cows.
Crops, average value per acre of, with acreage reports, by
states: 1919 and 1909_______________________________ 280
Se e also Farm crops.
Croup. Se e Death rates.
Dairy cows on farms January 1, 1920__________________ 274
Dairy products, value of, sold by farmers in 1919_______ 276
Death rates, general, of the United States (registration
area), and certain foreign countries for each of the
years from 1900 to 1922____________________________ 400
------from all causes per 1,000 population in the registra­
tion states of 1910: 1910 and 1920---------------------------- 402
------from certain important causes of death in the regis­
tration area of the United States for the years 1900
and 1910 to 1922__________________________________ 401
------per 100,000 population in the registration states of
1910, from certain diseases: 1910 and 1920—
Acute nephritis and Bright’s disease_________________ 409
Cancer and other malignant tumors_________________ 406
Cerebral hemorrhage and softening__________________ 407
Diabetes__________________________________________ 407
Diarrhea and enteritis______________________________ 409
Diphtheria and croup______________________________ 404
Influenza__________________ _______________________ 405
Measles___________________________________________ 403
Organic diseases of the heart________________________ 408
Pneumonia (all forms)______________________________ 408
Puerperal septicemia (female)_______________________ 410
Puerperal causes, all other (female)_________________ 410
Scarlet fever_______________________________________ 403
Tuberculosis of the lungs___________________________ 405
Tuberculosis (all other forms)_______________________ 406
402
Typhoid fever_________
Violent deaths (suicide excepted)____________________ 410
Whooping cough___________________________________ 404
Death registration area, per cent which the population
and land area of, formed of the total population and
land area of the United States for the years 1880, 1890,
and 1900 to 1922, inclusive_________________________ 399
Death registration area (exclusive of Hawaii), number of
deaths in, at all ages, under 1 year of age, and from 1
to 4 years of age, for each of the years 1900 to 1922.. 399
------per cent of deaths in, by color, by nativity of white
persons, and by parent nativity of the native white:
1922______________________________________________ 399
------per cent of deaths in, under 1 year of age, from 1 to 4
vears, and 5 years and over, for each of the years 1900
to 1922___________________________________________ 399
Deaths, growth of registration area for: 1880-1922 _____ 398
Debt, gross, at the close of the year, of the 48 states for
specified years: 1915-1922--------------------------------------- 391
------gross, at the close of the year, of 146 cities for speci­
fied years: 1903-1922--------------------------------------------- 395
------ gross, per capita, at the close of the year, of 146
cities for specified years: 1903-1922_________________ 395

INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
P la te N o .

D e b t, gross, per capita, a t th e close of th e year, o f th e 48
states, fo r specified years: 19 16 -192 2_________________
-------net, p e r c a p ita , a t th e close o f th e year, o f th e 48
states, fo r specified years: 19 15-1922_________________
S ee a lso Indebtedness.
Decrease, tow n s show ing: 1910-1920—
M a in e ________________________________________________
N ew H a m p s h ire _____________________________________
V e rm o n t_____________________________________________
Decrease in p o p u la tio n o f counties: 1900-1920. See I n ­
crease o r decrease in p o p u la tio n o f counties.
Decrease in p o p u la tio n , p e r cent o f: 1910-1920—
H a w a ii_______________________________________________
P o rto R ic o ___________________________________________
S e e Increase o r decrease in p o p u la tio n .
Decrease in to ta l and ru ra l p o p u la tio n , pe r cent of, b y
counties: 1910-1920. S e e Increase o r decrease in to ta l
and ru ra l p o p u la tio n .
D e n m a rk. S ee N o rw a y, etc.
D e n s ity of to ta l and ru ra l p o p u la tio n , b y counties: 1920—

N e va d a ______ ______
N e w H a m p s h ir e
( to ta l) ...............
N ew Jersey_________
N ew M e xico _______
N ew Y o rk ___________
N o rth C a rolina_____
N o rth D a k o ta _____
O hio_________________
O klah om a___________
O regon_______________
P e n n sylva n ia ______
Rhode Is la n d (to ta l)
S outh C a ro lin a _____
South D a k o ta ______
Tennessee___________
Texas ( ru ra l)_______
Texas (to ta l). . .........
U ta h _________________
V e rm o n t_____________
V irg in ia ______________
W ashing to n_________
W est V irg in ia ______
W isconsin____________
W yo m in g ____________

391

64
65
65

62
63

97
90
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
90
107
108
109
111
110
112
113
114
115
116
117
118

S ee also P o p u la tio n p e r square m ile.
D iabetes. S e e D e a th rates.
D ia rrh e a and e n te ritis. S ee D e a th rates.
D ip h th e ria and crou p. S ee D e a th rates.
Diseases, death rates fro m . S e e D e a th rates.
D ra in a g e enterprises, a p p ro xim a te lo ca tio n and area of,
o p e ra tin g : 1920—
P late N o .

Arkansas___________
C a lifo rn ia __________
C olora do___________
F lo rid a _____________
G eorgia.......................
Id a h o .................
Illin o is _____________
In d ia n a ____________
Io w a _______________
Kansas_____________
K e n tu c k y _______ _.




295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305

Louisiana___________
M ic h ig a n ___________
M in ne sota__________
M ississipp i-------------M is s o u ri___________
M o n ta n a ___________
N ebraska___________
N o rth C a ro lin a ------N o rth D a k o ta _____
O hio________________
South C a ro lin a _____

D ra ina ge enterprises, etc.— C o ntin ued .
P la te N o .

391

P la te N o .

A la ba m a_____________
72
A riz o n a ______________
73
Arkansas___________
74
C a lifo rn ia __________
75
C olora do_____________
76
C o n n e c tic u t__________
77
D elaw are___________
78
F lo rid a _______________
79
G eorgia______________
80
119
H a w a ii_____________
Id a h o ________________
81
Illin o is _______________
82
83
In d ia n a ____________
Io w a _________________
84
Kansas_______________
85
K e n tu c k y ......................
86
Lo u isia n a ____________
87
M a in e ________________
88
M a ry la n d ____________
89
M assachusetts(total)
90
M ic h ig a n _____________
91
M in ne sota____________
92
M ississippi___________
93
M is s o u ri_____________
94
M o n ta n a _____________
95
96
N ebraska_____________

467

306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316

S outh D a k o ta ______
Tennessee_________
Texas______________
U t a h . . . . ___________

317
305
318
319

P la te N o .

W ashing to n________
W isconsin__________
W yo m in g ___________

-------a p pro xim ate lo c a tio n and area of, op era ting, in the
U n ite d S tates: 1920____________________________________
D w ellings, nu m b e r of, per square m ile, b y states:
1910__________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
Eggs produced on farm s, b y states: 1919 an d 1909______
E ngland, Scotland, and Wales, d is trib u tio n o f foreign
w h ite stock o rig in a tin g in , b y states: 1920 and 1910_
_
-------d is trib u tio n o f n a tive s of, b y states: 1920___________
E nglish, unable to speak, fo re ig n -b o rn w h ite p o p u la tio n 10
years o f age an d o ve r: 1920 and 1910___________________
E nglish and C e ltic, d is trib u tio n o f fo re ig n w h ite stock
h a vin g specified m o th e r tongues, f o r selected states:
1920 an d 1910__________________________________________
E n te ritis . S ee D e a th rates.
E xpenditures, fa rm . S ee F a rm expenditures.
Expenses, p e r c a p ita n e t pa ym en ts f o r p rin c ip a l general
de p a rtm e n ta l, o f a ll citie s of ove r 30,000 in h a b ita n ts
fo r specified years: 1903-1922___________________________
-------pe r ca p ita pa ym en ts fo r p rin c ip a l general d e p a rt­
m ental, o f th e 48 states fo r specified years: 19 15-1922.
-------per cent d is trib u tio n of p rin c ip a l general d e p a rt­
m ental, o f a ll cities o f ove r 30,000 in h a b ita n ts fo r
specified years: 1903-1922_____________________________
-------pe r cent d is trib u tio n o f p rin c ip a l general d e p a rt­
m ental, o f th e 48 states fo r specified years: 1915-1922.
E xp o rts o f dom estic c o tto n , b y specified countries and by
m on th s: September, 1912, to J u ly , 1923----------------------Fam ilies, nu m be r of, pe r square m ile, b y states:
1910__________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
F arm crops, average value o f a ll, pe r fa rm , b y states:
1919 and 1909_________________________ ________________
-------value o f a ll, b y states:
1909 _______________________________________________
1919 and 1909------------------See also Crops.
F a rm expenditures, fo r feed, b y states: 1919 and 1909____
-------fo r fe rtiliz e r, 36 le a d in g states: 1919 and 1909______
-------fo r la bo r, b y states: 1919 and 1909--------------------------F a rm im p lem e nts and m ach in ery, value of, pe r acre o f
im p ro ve d la n d in farm s, b y states: 1920_______________
F a rm la nd , a ll, per cent d is trib u tio n b y race and n a tiv ity
o f farm er, b y states: 1920----------------------------------------------------a ll, per cent d is trib u tio n b y ten ure, b y states:
1910 ________________________________________________
1920 _______________________________________________
-------average acreage o f a ll, pe r fa rm , b y sta te s:
1910__________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
-------average acreage o f im p ro ve d , pe r fa rm , b y states:
1920 __________________________________________________
------- colored farm ers, p e r cen t of, operated b y ten ants, b y
states: 1920___________________________________________ 1
-------per cent o f a ll, operated b y colored farm ers, b y states:
1910__________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
------ - pe r cen t o f a ll, operated b y ten ants, b y states:
1910__________________________________________________
1920_________________________________________________
-------pe r cen t o f im p ro ve d , operated b y ten ants, b y states:
1910______________________________
1920__________________________________________________

320
321
322

294
220
220
277
208
203
219

210

394
390

395
391
374
221
221
280
279
279
270
270
270
253
264
255
255
243
243
244
262
266
266
258
258
259
259

468

STATISTICAL ATLAS.
P late N o .

F a rm land, w h ite farm ers, p e r cent of, operated b y te n ­
ants, b y states: 1920___________________________________ 262
See also L a n d in farm s, Im p ro v e d la n d in farm s, and
U n im p ro ve d la n d in farm s.
F a rm la n d a n d b u ild in g s, average value of, per a cre: 1850­
1920____________________________________________________
247
-------value o f, p e r acre, b y co u n tie s: 1920________________ 248
F a rm p ro p e rty , average value of, per fa rm , an d p e r cent
represented b y la n d , fo r owners and te n a n ts in selected
states: 1920____________________________________________
290
------- pe r ce n t o f increase in value o f a ll, b y states:
1850-1860____________________________________________ 249
1860-1870_________________________________ _ _____ . . . .
249
1870-1880____________________________________________ 250
1880-1890____________________________________________. 250
1890-1900 ____________________________________________ 251
1900-1910____________________________________________ 251
1910-1920____________________________________________ 252
— — pe r cen t o f to ta l value of, represented b y each class,
fo r owners and ten ants, in th e N o rth , S ou th, a n d W est:
1920____________________________________________________
292
------- pe r cent o f value o f a ll, represented b y each class o f
p ro p e rty , b y states:
1910_________________________________
247
1920__________________________________________________
247
------- value of, b y classes: 1850-1920 ______________________ 247
F a rm ten ants and owners, b y age: 1920—
I n th e South—
Colored___ '. ________________________________
264
264
W h ite ___________________________________________
I n th e U n ite d S tates_________________________________
264
F a rm values, center o f: 1850-1920________________________
137
Farm ers, sales and purchases b y, th ro u g h cooperative
organizations, 20 leading states: 1919__________________ 271
Farm s, average size of, b y sta te s:
1900 and 1890_____ .'_________________________________
246
1920 a n d 1910________________________________________
246
------- center o f: 1850-1920_________________________________ 137
------- m ortgaged, ra tio o f m ortgage d e b t to value of, b y
states: 1920_____________________________________________ 268
------- nu m be r o f :
------- Jan ua ry 1, 1 9 2 0 _____________________________________
240
—— in th e U n ite d S tates: 1 8 5 0 -192 0____________________
241
------- operated b y ten ants, Jan ua ry 1, 1 9 2 0 _______________
256
------- per cent d is trib u tio n b y race and n a tiv ity o f farm er,
b y states—
1910__________________________________________________
263
1920__________________________________________________
263
Per cent d is trib u tio n b y tenure, b y states—
1910__________________________________________________
254
1920__________________________________________________
254
------- operated b y ten ants, pe r cent o f :
B y counties—
1880_____________________________________________
289
1920_____________________________________________
257
1920_____________________________________________
289
B y geographic divisio n s: 1880-1920__________________
287
------- ow ner-operated, m ortgage d e b t on, b y states: 1920
and 1910________________________________________________ 269
S e e also M ortga ge debt.
------- per cen t d is trib u tio n of, in th e U n ite d States, b y
te n u re : 1880-1920______________________________________ 260
------- pe r cent d is trib u tio n o f ow ner-operated, according
to m ortgage status, b y states: 1920----------------------------- 268
------- pe r cent d is trib u tio n o f ow ner-operated, in the
U n ite d States, according to m ortgage status: 1890-1920 268




P late N o .

Farms, per cent of all, operated by colored farmers, by
counties: 1920_____________________________________
------per cent of all, reporting telephones, by states:
1920______________________________________________
------per cent of total land area in, by states: 1920______
------relative proportion of improved and unimproved
land area in, to the total land area of the United States:
1850-1920_________________________________________
------value of live stock per acre of all land in, by states:
1920_______
------rented, per cent farmers operating, by states: 1920—
Colored___________
W hite__________
Farms and farm acreage, per cent distribution of, by ten­
ure, for the North, South, and West: 1920____________
Feed, farm expenditures for, by states: 1919 and 1909___
Females, ratio of males to, in total population, by states:
1910_____________________
1920___________________________________
------10 to 13 years of age engaged in gainful occupations.
proportion of, by states:
1910____________________________
1920____________
------14 and 15 years of age engaged in gainful occupations,
proportion of, by states:
1910. _______
1920______
Females and males. Se e Males and females, etc.
Fertilizer, farm expenditures for, 36 leading states: 1919
and 1909______
Foreign white men 21 years of age and over, born in
specified countries or groups of countries, citizenship of:
1920_______________
Foreign white persons, born in specified countries or
groups of countries, citizenship of: 1920______________
Foreign white stock, by linguistic groups, elements of:
1920 and 1910_____________________________________
----- - by principal countries of origin:
1910_________________ .
____
1920____________________________________________
------by principal mother tongues: 1920 and 1910________
------per cent distribution of, by principal countries of
origin : 1920, 1910, and 1900_______________
Foreign white stock having specified mother tongues, dis­
tribution of, for selected states: 1920 and 1910—
English and Celtic________________
French_________________________________________
German_________________________________________
Italian__________________________________________
Norwegian______________________________________
Polish____________________________
Swedish_________________________________________
Yiddish and Hebrew_____________________________
Foreign white stock originating in selected countries and
groups of countries, distribution of, bv states: 1920 and
1910—
'
Austria and Hungary____________________________
Canada and Newfoundland__________
England, Scotland, and Wales____________________
Germany_______________________________________
Ireland_________________________
Italy_________
Norway, Sweden, andDenmark__________________
Russia__________________________________________
Foreign white women 21 years of age and over born in
specified countries or groups of countries, citizenship of:
1920_____

265
271
242
239
253
261
261
292
270
189
189
232
232
233
233
270
212
212

209
205
205
209
206
210

210
211
211
210
211
211
210
207
208
208
207
208
207
207
208
212

INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
P late N o .

F oreign -born p o p u la tio n , b y p rin c ip a l countries o f b ir th :
1920 and 1910__________________________________________
------- by.states: 1920 and 1910_____________________________
-------center o f: 1880-1920________________________________
------- d is trib u tio n o f n a tive s o f p rin c ip a l foreign countries
and groups o f countries, b y states: 1920—■
Canada and N e w fo u n d la n d __________________________
E ngland, Scotland, and W ales----------------------------------G e rm a n y_____________________________________________
Ire la n d _______________________________________________
I t a ly ________________________________________
N o rw a y, Sweden, and D e n m a rk _____________________
P olan d_______________________________________________
Russia________________________________________________
------- d is trib u tio n o f to ta l p o p u la tio n o f each state, as
b o rn in state o f residence, in o th e r states, o r foreign b o m :
1910__________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
------- in 1920, d is trib u te d as a rriv in g in the U n ite d States
before o r a fte r 1911____________________________________
-------o f th e U n ite d States, b y c o u n try o f b irth : 1920___
-------per cent o f t o ta l p o p u la tio n b o rn in state o f residence,
b o rn in o th e r states, o r foreign born, fo r cities h a vin g
100,000 in h a b ita n ts o r m ore:
1 9 1 0 .._______________________________________________
1920_________________________________
F oreign -born w h ite , d is trib u tio n b y age periods a n d sex
fo r: 1920_________ _________________________________ •____
-------per cent illite ra te in p o p u la tio n 10 years of age and
over, b y states:
1910____________________
1920__________________________________________________
1920 and 1910_______________________________________
-------per cent in to ta l p o p u la tio n , b y counties: 1920—

201
154
121

202
203
203
203
203
202
202
202

199
199
204
201

200
200
191

21G
216
218

P late N o .

A riz o n a ________ ____
C a lifo rn ia ____ ____
C olora do______ ____
C o n n e c tic u t. . ____
Id a h o __________ ____
Illin o is _____ __ ____
In d ia n a . _____ ____
Io w a ___________ ____
Kansas________ ____
M a in e _________ ____
M assachusetts. ____
M ic h ig a n ______ ____
M in ne sota_____ ____
M isso u ri_______ ____
M o n ta n a ______ ____
N ebraska______ ____

169
170
166
158
170
161
161
163
163
156
156
162
164
164
167
166

N e vad a__________ . .
N ew H a m p s h ire ..
New Jersey______ . .
New M e xico _____ . .
N ew Y o rk ___ . . . .
N o rth D a k o ta . . . .
O hio_______ . . .
Oregon______ ____
P en nsylvania.
Rhode Is la n d ____ .
S ou th D a k o ta ------ . .
U ta h ____
. ..
V e rm o n t—
. .. ..
W ashing to n___ __ . .
W isconsin________
W y o m in g ________ . .

F oreign -born w h ite , per cent in to ta l p o p u la tio n , b y states:
1910___________ ______________________________________
1920___________ ____________________________ _______150
------- states show ing increase in : 1910-1920______________
F o reign -born w h ite and n a tiv e w h ite o f foreign o r m ixed
parentage com bined, per cent in to ta l p o p u la tio n , by
states:
1910................... .......................... ............................ .......... ..
1920___________ ______________________________________
F oreign -bom w h ite farm ers in th e U n ite d States, by
c o u n try o f b ir th : 1920 and 1910_______________________
Foreign-born w h ite po p u la tio n , per cent n a turalized , by
c o u n try o f b ir th : 1920_________________________________
-------10 years o f age a n d over unable to speak E ng lish:
1920 and 1910________________________________________
French, d is trib u tio n o f fo re ig n w h ite stock h a vin g speci­
fied m o th e r tongue, fo r selected states: 1920 a n d 1910.




168
157
159
169
159
165
160
171
160
158
165
168
157
171
162
167

150
148

151
151
264
212
219
210

469
P late N o .

Geographic centers________________________________________
Geographic d ivisio n s: 1920_______________________________
G erm an, d is trib u tio n o f fo reign w h ite stock h a vin g speci­
fied m o th e r tongue, fo r selected states: 1920 and 1910.
G erm any, d is trib u tio n o f fo reign w h ite stock o rig in a tin g
in , b y states: 1920 and 1910___________________________
-------d is trib u tio n o f natives of, b y states: 1920___________
G old and s ilv e r p ro d u cin g lo ca litie s: 1919_________________
G overnm ental-cost paym ents. S e e Paym ents, govern­
m e n ta l cost, and Revenue receipts.
H a w a ii, per cent o f H a w aiia ns and p a rt-H a w a iia n s in
to ta l p o p u la tio n of, b y counties: 1920__________________
-------per cent o f increase o r decrease in p o p u la tio n , b y
counties: 1910-1920____________________________________
H aw aiians and p a rt-H a w a iia n s. S e e H a w a ii
H e art, organic diseases of. S ee D e a th rates.
Hebrew. S ee Y id d ish , etc.
Homes, per cent o f .owned free, owned encumbered, and
rented, in to ta l nu m b e r o f homes, b y states: 1920 and

1910______________________________________________
•----- per cent of, owned mortgaged, owned free, and
rented, for cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more:
1920----------------------- --------------------------------------------Homes not on farms:
Per cent owned mortgaged, owned free, and rented—
By geographic divisions: 1890-1920___________
By states: 1890-1920________________________
Per cent rented, and owned, by sections and geo­
graphic divisions: 1890—
1920----------------------------Homes not on farms owned:
Per cent free, and mortgaged, by sections and geo­
graphic divisions: 1890-1920----------------------------Per cent mortgaged—
1890________________________________________
1920________________________________________
By states: 1920 and 1890----------------Homes not on farms owned mortgaged:
Average annual interest charge per home—
By geographic divisions: 1920 and 1890---------By states: 1920 and 1890______________
Average annual rate of interest—
By geographic divisions: 1920 and 1890----------By states: 1920 and 1890-----------------------------Average value and average mortgage debt per home—
By sections and geographic divisions: 1920 and
1890______________________________________
By states: 1920 and 1890____________________
Per cent of total number and total mortgage debt
bearing specified rates of interest, for the United
States: 1920 and 1890_________________________
Per cent of total number and total value in each value
class, for the United States: 1920 and 1890-------Ratio of debt to value—
1890______
1920________________________________________
Ratio (per cent) of mortgage debt to value, by states:
1920 and 1890_________________________________
Value and mortgage debt, by geographic divisions:
1920 and 1890_________________________________
Homes owned, per cent mortgaged for cities having 100,­
000 inhabitants or more: 1920______________________
Homes owned mortgaged:
Average annual interest charge per home for—
Cities having, in 1890, 100,000 inhabitants or
more: 1920 and 1890______________________
Cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more:
1920______________________________________

138
2
211
207
203
360

188
62

222
377
375.

376
375

378
379
379
378
386
387
386
387
381
382
385
389
384
384
377
381
380
389
388

470

STATISTICAL ATLAS.

Homes owned mortgaged—Continued.
F
no.
Average annual rate of interest for cities having 100,­
000 inhabitants or more: 1920__________________ 388
Average value and average mortgage debt per home
for—
Cities having, in 1890, 100,000 inhabitants or
more: 1920 and 1890_- ____________________ 383
Cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more:
1920____________ _________________ _______ 382
Ratio (per cent) of mortgage debt to value for—
Cities having, in 1890, 100,000 inhabitants or
more: 1920 and 1890______________________ 385
Cities having 100,000 inhabitants or more:
1920______________________________ j ______ 380
Hungary. Se e Austria, etc.
Illiterates, per cent in population 10 years of age and
over, by states: 1910 and 1920__________________ 214-218
Se e also Population.
Implements. Se e Farm implements and machinery.
Improved acreage, center of: 1900-1920_______________ 137
Improved and unimproved land in farms, and land not in
farms, by states: 1920 and 1910_____________________ 241
------and land not in farms in the United States: 1850­
1920_________ _________ ______________ ____________ 241
Improved farm land, per cent of, operated by colored
farmers, by states:
1910___________________________________
267
1 9 2 0 ..._________
267
Improved land, average acreage of, per farm, by states:
1920______________________
244
Improved land in farms, January 1 , 1920_________ 245
------ per cent of, operated by tenants, owners, and man­
agers, for selected states: 1920__________________ 288
------ proportion to total land area: 1910___________ _— 244
------ relative proportion of improved and unimproved land
area in farms to the total land area qf the United States:
1850-1920________
239
Increase, per cent of, in population and agriculture: 1910­
1920______________
242
------ per cent of, in the total population of the United
States and each geographic division: 1910-1920 and
1900-1910____
9
Increase in population, by geographicdivisions: 1910-1920 9
------per cent of, 1910-1920, and in manufactures, 1909­
1919___________________________________________ 350
Increase in population of territory, rural in 1910, per cent
of, by states: 1900-1910______________
145
------rural in 1920, per cent of, by states: 1910-1920------ 145
------urban in 1910, per cent of, by states: 1900-1910— 144
------urban in 1920, per cent of, by states: 1910-1920— 144
Increase in total population, by states, per cent of: 1910­
1920 and 1900-1910__________
12
------comparison of rate of, with rate of change of immi­
gration: 1850-1920________________ _______________ 10
------ distribution of the per cent of, by geographic divi­
sions: 1910-1920 and 1900-1910_____ 1_____________
9
Increase in total, total white, and negro population, per
cent of: 1790-1920, and in nativewhite: 1850-1920.-- 139
Increase in value of all farm property, per cent of, by
states: 1850-1920 ______________________________ 249-252
Increase or decrease in population of counties: 1900-1920—
lats

Plate N o.

Delaware_________ 67 Missouri______________
Iowa______________ 66 Nevada_______________
Maine____________ 67 New Hampshire_______
Mississippi________ 66 Vermont______________
Increase or decrease in total population, "per cent of, by
counties:
1900-1910______________________________________
1910-1920_______________________________________




P late N o.

Increase or decrease in total population, per cent of, by
states:
1880-1890____ ____________ __________________ ....
1890-1900________________ _____________ ________
1900-1910______________________________________
1910-1920_______________________________________
Increase or decrease in population of Hawaii, by counties,
per cent of: 1910-1920_____________________________
Increase or decrease in population of Porto Rico, by
municipalities, per cent of: 1910-1920_______________
Increase or decrease in total and rural population, per
cent of, by counties: 1910-1920—
Plate N o.

Alabama______
Arizona________
Arkansas.. ___
California______
Colorado.. __
Connecticut____
Delaware______
District of Columbia
Florida________
Georgia________
Idaho... . .
Illinois_________
Indiana________
Iowa.'._________
K a n sas.._____
Louisiana______
Maine.. . . __
Maryland______
Minnesota...........
Mississippi_____

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Nebraska___ ______—
Nevada_____ . . --------New Ham pshire.-------New Jersey.. . ---------New Mexico___________
New York_____________
North Carolina-----------North Dakota_________
Ohio__________________
Oklahoma_____________
Oregon-----------------------Pennsylvania__________
Rhode Island--------------South Carolina-----------South Dakota-------------Texas (rural)--------------Texas (total)--------------Utah__________________

33
34 Washington----------------35 West Virginia--------------

8
8

7
7
62
63

38
39
32
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
32
49
50
51
53
52
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

36
Montana_____
37 Wyoming---------------- -Indebtedness, net, per capita, at the close of the year,
of 146 cities for specified years: 1903—
1922--------------- 395
See also Debt.
Indian population of the United States, distribution of,
by states:
1910.............. ........................................................................ I*5
1920______________________ ____________________ 185
Indians, Alaska, number and distribution of, by linguis­
tic stock:
1920.. .1 ........................................................ ....................- I*6
------per cent of, in total population of Alaska, by judicial
districts: 1920_____________________________________ *87
Industries, manufacturing, leading, value of products for:
1919 and 1914......... ............................................................... - 347
------manufacturing, value of products
of:
1919, 1914, and 1909...............
346
Infant mortality, by country of birth of mother, in the
registration area: 1922____________________________411-412
Influenza. S e e Death rates.
Interstate migration, distribution of population born in
each state as living in state of birth or in other states:
66
1910______
I 98
66
1920.................................................
I 98
67
net gain or loss through:
67
1910. ................................
I 97
1920_____
I97
— of native population:
1910______________
I 96
6
. 1920_________________________
I 96
5
fo r

g ro u p s

INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
Plate N o .

Interstate migration, per cent which population born in
each state and living in other states formed of total
born in each state:
1910
1920
------per cent which population born in other states
formed of total native population living in each state:
1910..............
1920.............
------states having gained or lost through: 1920_______
See also Migration.
Ireland, distribution of foreign white stock originating
in, by states: 1920 and 1910________________________
------distribution of natives of, by states: 1920_________
Iron ore, production of:
By principal states: 1879-1919___________________
Per cent of production, by states: 1919____________
Principal producing localities: 1919_________________
United States and principal producing regions: 1879­
1920________________________________
Irrigated areas, approximate location and extent of, in
the United States: 1920 ____________________________
Irrigated land, approximate location and extent of:
1920P
N o.
Arizona___________ 324
Nevada___________
Arkansas__________ 325
New Mexico______
California_________ 326
North Dakota_____
Colorado__________ 327
Oregon____________
South Dakota_____
Idaho_____________ 328
Kansas----------------- 329
Texas_____________
Utah............................
Louisiana_________ 330
Montana__________ 331
Washington_______
Nebraska_________ 332
Wyoming................
Italian, distribution of foreign white stock having speci­
fied mother tongue, for selected states: 1920 and 1910
Italy, distribution of foreign white stock originating in,
by states: 1920 and 1910_________________________
— distribution of natives of, by states: 1920 ________
Labor, farm expenditures for, by states: 1919 and 1909.
Land area and population of the registration area, per
cent which the, formed of the total population and land
area of the United States for the years 1880,1890, and
1900 to 1922, inclusive_____________________________
Land area in farms, per cent of jtotal, by states: 1920.._
------relative proportion of improved and unimproved to
the total land area of the U. S.: 1850-1920__________
Land in farms, improved, January 1, 1920_____________
------proportion of improved, to total land area: 1910____
Land in farms, improved and unimproved and land not
in farms:
By states: 1920 and 1910_______________ ________
In the United States: 1850-1920__________________
Lead and zinc, and copper producing localities: 1919----Linguistic groups, elements of foreign white stock by:
1920 and 1910............
Live stock, per cent distribution of value of, by classes,
and average value per farm, for owners and tenants,
in selected states: 1920_____________________________
------ value of, per acre of all land in farms, by states: 1920
Machinery. See Farm implements and machinery.
■ Males, 10 to 13 years of age engaged in gainful occupa­
tions, proportion of, by states:
1910_______
1920.................




late

471
P late N o .

Males, 14 and 15 years of age engaged in gainful occupa­
tions, proportion of, by states:
1910_____________________________________
231
194
1920____________________________________________ 231
194 ------ratio to females in total population, by states:
1910_____
189
1920_____
189
195
Se e also Men.
195 Males and females, of each specified age group engaged
200
in gainfuloccupations, proportion of:1920__________ 238
------ 10 years of age and over engaged in certain gain­
ful occupations, proportion of:1920__________________ 234
208 ------10 years of age and over engaged in each general
203
division ofgainful occupations,proportion of: 1920.. 238
------proportion that males and females 10 years of age and
359
over engaged in gainful occupations formed of the total
359
population 10 years of age and over occupied, by states:
357
1920 and 1910_____________________________________ 225
------proportion that males and females 10 years of age
358
and over with gainful occupations formed of all males
and females 10 years of age and over: 1920 and 1910.. 224
323 Managers, tenants, and owners, per cent of improved land
in farms operated by, for selected states: 1920_______ 288
Manufacture, value added by, by states: 1919 and 1914. 344
Manufactured products, value of, by states:
333 ------value of all, and proportional value for1919______ 350
each geo­
334
graphic division: 1919, 1914,
1909,1904, and 1899_ 342
335 ------value of all, and proportional value for each group:
336
1919, 1914,
and 1899-----------------------------337 Manufactures,1909, 1904, 1850-1920----------------------------- 345
center of:
137
338 ------per cent of increase in, 1909-1919, and in popula­
339
tion, 1910-1920.........................................- .........................
340 Manufacturing industries, value of products, by states: 350
341
1919 and 1914________________________ - ..................... 343
------value of products for groups of: 1919,1914, and 1909. 346
211 Marital condition of population 15 years of age and over,
by sex and age periods, for principal population classes:
1920 ________________________________- .................... 193
207
203 Measles. Se e Death rates.
270 Median lines, center of population, and center of area:
1920, and median point: 1880-1920-------------------------- 122
Median point. See Median lines, etc.
Men, foreign white, 21 years of age and over, born in
specified countries or groups of countries, citizenship
399
of: 1920__________________________________________ 212
242
Se e also Males, etc.
239 Migration of native population from and to each state:
1910._____
196
245
1 9 2 0 ..._______
196
244
Se e also Interstate migration, etc.
Mining industries, per cent distribution of value of
products:
241
By geographic divisions:1919-------------------------------- 351
241
By industries: 1919______________________________ 352
361
------value of products:
By states—
209
1919._______
352
1919, 1909, and 1902________________________ 351
Leading industries—
291
By states—
253
1909______
354
1919____________________________________ 353
1919, 1909, and1902____________________ 352
230 Mortgage debt, on owner-operated farms, by states: 1920
and 1910__________________________________________ 269
230

472

STATISTICAL ATLAS.
P late N o .

Mortgage debt, ratio of, to value of mortgaged farms, by
states: 1920_______________________________________ 268
Mortgaged farms, ratio of mortgage debt to value of, by
states: 1920_______________________________________ 268
Mortgaged homes. Se e Homes, etc.
Mother tongues, principal, foreign white stock by: 1920
and 1910___________ , ___________ _________________ 209
------ specified, distribution of foreign white stock having,
for selected states: 1920 and 1910________________ 210-211
See also Foreign white stock, etc.
Municipalities. See Cities, etc.
Native population, per cent which population born in
other states formed of total native population living in
each state:
1910_________________ __________________________ 195
1920.._________________________________________ 195
Native white, distribution by age periods and sex for cer­
tain principal population classes: 1920__________
192
Native white of foreign parentage, distribution by age
periods and sex for certain principal population classes:
1920_______________________________________
192
Native white of foreign or mixed parentage, per cent in
total population, by states:
1910______________________
149
149
1920_______
Native white of foreign or mixed parentage and foreignborn white combined, per cent in total population, by
states:
1910________________________
151
1920______________________________________
151
Native white of mixed parentage, distribution by age
periods and sex for certain principal population classes:
1920_____________________________________
192
Native white of native parentage, distribution by age
periods and sex for certain principal population classes:
1920______________________________________________ 192
------per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states:
1910_________________ _________________ _________ 215
1920___________________________________ _____—. 215
1920 and 1910____ ___________________ _______— 218
------per cent in total population, by states: 1920----------- 148
------per cent in white population, by states:
1910________
147
1920___________________________________________ 147
Native white persons of native parentage 10 years of age
and over, per cent distribution of, engaged in gainful
occupations: 1920_________________________________ 223
Native white population, center of:1920_______________ 121
Nativity. See Color or race, etc.
Natural gas fields. See Petroleum, etc.
Negro population, by states:1920 and 1910_____________ 154
------center of: 1790 and 1880-1920____________________ 121
------cities of 10,000 inhabitants or more in 1920, having
50 per cent or more of their population negro in either
1910 or 1920______________________________________ 174
------counties in Southern states having at least 50 per
cent of their population negro:
1860___________________________________________ 173
1880.. . . __________
173
1900________________....______________ __________ 173
1920____________________________________________ 173
------for 1920 and 1910, in cities having 100,000 inhabit­
ants or more and at least 10,000 negroes in 1920_______ 174
------states in which increase was more than 1,000 and
was at a higher rate than increase in total population:
1910-1920________________________________________ 174




P late N o -

Negroes, distribution by age periods and sex: 1920
191
— —per cent black and mulatto in total population of
Porto Rico, by municipalities: 1920_________________ 184
------per cent in total population by counties: 1920—
P late N o .

Alabama_________ 180
M ississippi...____
Arkansas__________ 182
North Carolina.. .
Delaware_____ __ 175
Oklahoma........... ......
Districtof Columbia. 175
South Carolina___
Florida. __________ 179
Tennessee____ . _
Georgia___________ 178
Texas ................. ......
Kentucky________ 181
Virginia___________
Louisiana................ 179
West Virginia__. .
Maryland. ______ 176
------per cent illiterate in population 10 years of age and
over, by states:
1910____________________________________________
1920__________________________
1920 and 1910____________________________
J----per cent in total population, by states:
1910____
1920..__________________________________________
Newfoundland. See Canada, etc.
Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, distribution of foreign
white stock originating in, by states: 1920 and 1910...
------distribution of natives of, by states: 1920________
Norwegian, distribution of foreign white stock having spec­
ified mother tongue, by selected states: 1920 and 1910.
Number of farms, center of: 1850-1920________________
Oats production:
Center of: 1850-1920____________________________
15 leading states: 1919 and 1909__________________
In 1919____________________________
In the United States: 1849-1919__________________
Occupations, gainful, per cent distribution, by marital
condition, of the gainfully occupied women 15 years of
age and over, by states: 1920______________________
------per cent distribution of native white persons of native
parentage 10 years of age and over engaged in: 1920. _
------proportion of children of each sex 10 to 15 years of
age engaged in: 1880-1920_________________________
------proportion of children of each sex 10 to 15 years of
age engaged in, by states, arranged by geographic divi­
sions: 1920 and 1910______________________________
------proportion of each principal class of population 10
years of age and over, both sexes, males, and females,
engaged in: 1920__________________________________
------proportion of females 10 to 13 years of age engaged
in, by states:
1910----------------------------------------------------------------1920___________________________________________
------proportion of females 14 and 15 years of age engaged
in, by states:
1910____________________________
1920----------------------------------------------------------------------proportion of males 10 to 13 years of age engaged
in, by states:
1910___________________________________________
1920___________________________________________
------proportion of males 14 and 15 years of age en­
gaged in, by states:
1910-------------1920___________________________________________
------proportion of males and females of each specified
age group engaged in: 1920________________________
------ proportion of males and females 10 years of age and
over engaged in certain: 1920______________________

180
176
182
178
181
183
177
177
217
217
218
172
172
207
202
210
137
137
281
285
281
229
223
225
226
238
232
232
233
233
230
230
231
231
238
234

INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
P late N o .

Occupations, gainful, proportion of males and females 10
years of age and over engaged in each general division
of: 1920__________________________________________ 238
------proportion of married and of single, widowed,
divorced, and unknown women among gainfully oc­
cupied women 15 years of age and over: 1890-1920---- 227
------ proportion of married and of single, widowed,
divorced, and unknown women among women 15 years
of age and over in each general division of: 1920______ 227
------proportion of married and of single, widowed,
divorced, and unknown women 15 years of age and
over in each principal class of the population engaged
in: 1920__________________________________________ 227
------proportion of married women 15 years of age and '
over engaged in, by states: 1920 and 1910___________ 228
------proportion of population 10 years of age and over
engaged in, by states: 1920, 1910, and 1900-------------- 223
------proportion of population 10 years of age and over
engaged in each general division of, classified as in­
dustrial and nonindustrial, by geographic divisions:
1920__________________________________________ 235-236
------proportion of population 10 years of age and over,
in each state, engaged in each general division of:
1920.-------237
------proportion of women 15 years of age and over in each
specified age period and marital class engaged in: 1920. _ 227
------proportion of women 15 years of age and over in
each specified marital class engaged in: 1890-1920----- 227
------proportion that males and females 10 years of age
and over engaged in, formed of the total population 10
years of age and over occupied, by states: 1920 and
1910-------225
------ proportion that males and females 10 years of age and
over with, formed of all males and females 10 years of
age and over: 1920 and 1910------------------------------------- 224
------proportion which gainful workers of both sexes, in
each specified age group, constituted of all gainful
workers, and the proportion which males and females of
each age group formed of total male and female workers:
1920_____________________________________________ 238
Owned homes. See Homes, etc.
Owner-operated farms, mortgage debt on, by states: 1920
and 1910__________________________________________ 269
------ per cent distribution of, according to mortgage
status, by states: 1920-------------------------------------------- 268
------per cent distribution of, in the United States, accord­
ing to mortgage status: 1890-1920__________________ 268
Owners, tenants, and managers, per cent of improved land
in farms operated by, for selected states: 1920------------- 288
Owners and farm tenants, in the United States, by age:
1920--------264
------colored, in the South, by age: 1920________________ 264
------white, in the South, by age: 1920__________________ 264
Owners and tenants, average value of farm property per
farm, and per cent represented by land for, in selected
290
states: 1920__________________
------ number and per cent of, by age, for the North,
South, and West: 1920_____________________________ 290
------percent distribution of value of live stock, by classes,
and average value per farm for, in selected states: 1920_. 291
------per cent of total value of farm property represented
by each class for, in the North, South, and West: 1920- _ 292
Parentage. See Color or race, nativity, and parentage,
etc.
Payments, governmentai-cost, and revenue receipts of the
48 states for specifiedyears: 1915-1922._____________ 390




473
P late N o .

Payments, governm ental-cost, net, and net revenue re­
ceipts o f 146 cities fo r specified years: 1903-1922______
-------■governm ental-cost, net, per cent d is trib u tio n of, o f
146 cities fo r specified years: 1903-1922________________
-------governm ental-cost, per cent d is trib u tio n of, of th e 48
states, fo r specified years: 1915-1922___________________
-------per capita, fo r p rin c ip a l general de p a rtm e n ta l ex­
penses o f th e 48 states, fo r specified yea rs: 1915-1922 . .
-------per capita, fo r p rin c ip a l general de p a rtm e n ta l outlays,
of a ll cities o f over 30,000 in h a b ita n ts fo r specified years:
1903-1922______________________________________________
-------per capita, fo r specified general de p a rtm e n ta l outlays,
o f the 48 states fo r specified years: 1915-1922__________
------- per capita, governm ental-cost, o f th e 48 states fo r
specified yea rs: 1 9 1 5 - 1 9 2 2 - _____________ !___________
-------per capita, net, fo r governm ental-costs, b y p rin c ip a l
classes, of 146 cities fo r specified years: 1903-1922_____
See also Expenses.
Petroleum and n a tu ra l gas, p rin c ip a l fields of th e U n ite d
States: 1919___________________________________________
Pigs raised on farm s, b y states: 1919______________________
Pneumonia. S ee D e ath rates.
Poland, d is trib u tio n o f natives of, by states: 1920__________
Polish, d is trib u tio n o f foreign w h ite stock h a vin g specified
m othe r tongue, fo r selected states: 1 9 2 0 a n d l9 1 0 ________
P opulation, Alaska, b y ju d ic ia l d is tric ts : 1920____________
Population, b o rn in each state and liv in g in other states,
per cent w h ich, form ed o f to ta l born in each state:
1910___________________________________________________
1920___________________________________________________
-------born in o th e r states, per cent w hich, form ed of to ta l
na tive p o p u la tio n liv in g in each state:
1910___________________________________________________
1920__________________________________________________
P opulation, center o f :
January 1, 1920_____ _________ .______________________
C enter o f area and m edian lines: 1920, and median
p o in t: 1880-1920___________________________________
Each state: 1880-1920. See Center of p o p u la tio n of
each state.
T o ta l, n a tive w h ite, foreign-born, negro, urban, and
r u r a l________________________________________________
------- centers o f: 1790-1920______________________ •_______
------- comparison o f rate o f increase in to ta l, w ith rate of
change o f im m ig ra tio n : 1850-1920____________________
-------counties in w hich, decreased:
1880-1920___________________________________________
1910-1920_____________________________________________

------decrease. See Increase or decrease.
------density of, by counties: 1920. See Density-of total
and rural population.
------distribution of, born in each state as living in state of
birth or in other states:
1910___________________________________________
1920___________________________________________
------distribution of, of each state as born in state of resi­
dence, in other states, or foreign born:
1910___________________________________________
1920___________________________________________
------distribution of the per cent of increase in total, by
geographic divisions: 1910-1920and 1900-1910_______
------growth of, in area enumerated in 1790, with growth in
remainder of country: 1790-1920___________________
------Hawaii, per cent of increase or decrease of, by coun­
ties:
1910-1920 ______________________________________

393
394
390

390

395
391
390
393

356
278
202
211
61

194
194

195
195
120
122

121
137
10

11
'll

198
198
199
199
9
10
62

474

STATISTICAL ATLAS
P late N o .

Population, illiterate, per cent in population 10 years of
age and over, by states:
All classes—•
1910_____
1920_______________________________________
1920 and 1910______________________________
Foreign-born white—
1910_______________________________________
1920_______________
1920 and 1910______
Native white of native parents—
1910_______________
1920___________________________t ___________
1920 and 1910_______________________________
Negro—
1910................................
1920_______________
1920 and 1910______________________________
------increase in, by geographic divisions: 1910-1920_____
See also Increase.
------increase or decrease in, per cent of, by counties: 1910­
1920. S e e Increase or decrease in total and rural popu­
lation.
------increase or decrease of counties: 1900-1920. See
Increase or decrease in population of counties.
------per cent attending school in total, and in certain
classes at each year of age:
6- 20, inclusive: 1910____________________ _____
7- 20, inclusive: 1 9 20 .------- ---------------- --------------------peT cent of increase in, and agriculture: 1910-1920- ------ per cent of increase in, 1910-1920, and in manu­
factures, 1909-1919 _______________________________
------per cent which the population and land area of the
registration area formed of the total population and land
area of the United States for'the years 1880, 1890, and
1900 to 1922, inclusive______________________________
------Porto Rico, per cent of increase or decrease in, by
municipalities: 1910-1920__:_______________________
------rural. See Rural population, and rural territory.
------ rural territory in 1910, per cent of increase in, by
states: 1900-1910__________________________
------ rural territory in 1920, per cent of increase in, by
states: 1910-1920_________________________________
------ 10 years of age and over, proportion engaged in each
general division of gainful occupations, classified as in­
dustrial and nonindustrial, by geographic divisions:
1920_________________________________ ______235-236
------10 years of age and over, proportion engaged in gain­
ful occupations, by states:1920, 1910, and 1900________
------10 years of age and over, proportion in each state,
engaged in each general division of gainful occupations:
1920_____________________ - ......................................... ..
------10 years of age and over, proportion of each principal
class, both sexes, males, and females, engaged in gainful
occupations: 1920_________________________________
Population, total:
By geographic divisions: 1920 and 1910___________
By states: 1920 and 1910-----------------------------------Center of: 1790-1920..-______________________ 1.
Distribution by age periods and sex for certain prin­
cipal population classes: 1920__________________
Distribution by classes: 1850-1920
Population in cities having a population of over 30,000,
and outside such cities, for specified years: 1790­
1922____________________
------in places of 8,000 inhabitants or more at each census:
1790-1920____________________________________




214
214
218
216
216
218
215
215
218
217
217
218
9

213
213
242
350
399
63
145
145

223
237
238
9

12
121
191
152
393
143 .

P late N o .

Population of cities having, in 1920, 100,000 inhabitants
or more: 1920 and 1910___________________________ 143
Population per square mile:
1790-1920____— ____________________________ 139
By counties—
1910______________
69
1920_______________________________________ 68
By states—
1890_______________________________________ 71
1900_______________________________________ 71
1910___________
70
1920_______________________________________ 70
1920 and 1910______________________________ 139
Population, total, increase or decrease in, per cent of:
By counties—
1900-1910_______________
6
1910-1920— ____ _______________ ________. . .
5
By states—
1880-1890._____
8
1890-1900__________________________________
8
1900-1910__________________________________
7
1910-1920__________________________________
7
------total, of great cities at each census: 1790-1920_____ 146
------total, per cent of, in cities having a population of over
30,000 and per cent outside such cities for specified
years: 1790-1920.________________________________ 393
------total, per cent of, bom in state of residence, born in
other states, or foreign born, for cities having 100,000
inhabitants or more:
1910,..................
200
1920_____________________________________- .......... 200
------total, per cent of increase, of the United States, and
each geographic division:1910-1920, and 1900-1910. .
9
------total, per cent of increase in, by states: 1910-1920,
12
and 1900-1910_________________________
------total, total white, and negro, per cent of increase in:
1790-1920, and per cent of increase in native white:
1850-1920__________
139
------total 10 years of age and over occupied, proportion
that males and females 10 years of age and over engaged
in gainful occupations formed of the, by states: 1920
and 1910__________
225
------total white, distribution by age periods and sex for
total population and for certain principal population
classes: 1920______________________________________ 191
------urban. See Urban population.
------urban and rural: 1880-1920______________________ 143
------urban territory in 1910, per cent of increase in, by
states: 1900-1910__________________________________ 144
------urban territory in 1920, per cent of increase in, by
states: 1910-1920_________________________________ 144
Porto Rico, per cent of increase or decrease in population,
by municipalities: 1910-1920_______________________ 63
Potatoes, production of, 20 leading states: 1919 and 1909. 282
See also Sweet potatoes.
Puerperal causes and Puerperal septicemia. See Death
rates.
Race. See Color or race, nativity, and parentage.
Race and nativity of farmer, all farm land, per cent dis­
tribution by, by states: 1920---------------------------------- 264
—— number of farms, per cent distribution by, by states:
1910_____________________
263
1920______________________ ____________________ 263
Registration area for births, annual birth rates per 1,000
population, by months: 1918-1922__________________ 390
------ births by color, and for white children by parent
nativity in: 1 9 2 2 ...---------------------------------------------- 396

INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS.
P late N o .

Registration area for births, births of white children of
known parentage having at least one parent foreign
born in: 1922______________________ ______________ 396
------ growth of: 1915-1922__________________________ 397
Registration area for deaths, death rates from certain
important causes, for the years 1900 and 1910 to 1922.. 401
------general death rates of the United States, and certain
foreign countries for each of the years from 1900 to 1922. 400
------growth of: 1880—
1922____________________________ 398
Registration area for deaths, number of deaths in (exclusi ve of Hawaii), at all ages, under 1 year of age, and from
1 to 4 years of age, for each of the years 1900 to 1922. _ 399
------per cent of deaths in (exclusive of Hawaii), by color,
by nativity of white persons, and by parent nativity of
the native white: 1922 ------------------------------------------- 399
------per cent of deaths in (exclusive of Hawaii), under
1 year of age, from 1 to 4 years, and 5 years and over,
for each of the years 1900 to 1922____________i ______ 399
------ per cent which the population and land area of,
formed of the total population and land area of the
United States for the years 1880,1890, and 1900 to 1922,
inclusive------------------------------------------------------------- 399
Registration states. See Death rates, etc.
Revenue receipts, net, from the several sources of revenue,
per cent distribution, of 146 cities for specified years:
1903-1922________________________________________ 394
------ net, and net governmental-cost payments of 146
cities for specified years: 1903-1922 ------------------------ 393
------per capita, by principal classes, of the 48 states for
specified years: 1915-1922-------------------------------------- 390
------per capita, net, by principal classes, of 146 cities for
specified years: 1903-1922-------------------------------------- 394
------and governmental-cost payments of the 48 states for
specified years: 1915-1922-------------------------------------- 390
------from the several sources of revenue, per cent distri­
bution of, of the 48 states for specified years: 1915-1922 390
Rural population, center of: 1910 and1920_____________ 121
------density of total and rural, by counties: 1920.
See Density of total and rural population.
------per cent of increase or decrease, by counties: 1910­
1920.
See Increase or decrease in total and rural population.
------per square mile, by counties:
1910___________________________________________
4
3
1920____________________
------urban and: 1880-1920----------------------------------------- 143
Rural territory, in 1910, per cent of increase in popula­
tion of, by states: 1900-1910_______________________ 145
------in 1920, per cent of increase in population of, by
states: 1910-1920__________________________________ 145
Russia, distribution of foreign white stock originating in,
by states: 1920 and 1910___________________________ 208
------distribution of natives of, by states:1920__________ 202
Rye, production of, 10 leading states: 1919and 1909___ 282
Scarlet fever. See Death rates.
School attendance, per cent in total population and in
certain classes at each year of age:
620, inclusive: 1910______________________ 213
720, inclusive: 1920__________
213
Scotland. See England, etc.
Sex. See Age and sex and Age periods and sex.
Silver and gold producing localities: 1919______________ 360
Sinking fund assets, per capita, at the close of the year,
for specified years:
Cities (146): 1903-1922__________________________ 395
States (48): 1915-1922___________. ______________ 391




475
P late N o.

Sweden. See Norway, etc.
Swedish, distribution of foreign white stock having speci­
fied mother tongue, for selected states: 1920 and 1910. 211
Sweet potatoes, production of, 15 leading states: 1919 and
1909...............
282
See also Potatoes.
Swine on farms, January 1, 1920______________________ 275'
Telephones, per cent of all farms reporting, by states:
1920________________________
271
Tenancy, per cent of, in each age group:
Selected states: 1920------------------------------------------- 287
The North, South, and West: 1890-1920__________ 291
------relation between quality of soil and per cent of:
Monroe, Northampton, Lehigh, and Carbon Counties,
Pennsylvania______________________________________ 288.
Tenants, labor income, return on landlord’s investment,
in relation to, Yazoo-Mississippi Delta: 1913________ 293
------number of farms operated by: January 1, 1920____ 256.
------per cent of, in each labor-income group, YazooMississippi Delta: 1913____________________________ 293­
------per cent of all farm land operated by, by states:
1910____________________________________ .^ _ ^ -'2 5 8 258­
1920_____________
------per cent of farms operated by:
By counties—
1880__________________
289
1920______
257
1 9 2 0 ..._______________________________ . . . . 289
By geographic divisions: 1880-1920_______________ 287
------per cent of improved farm land operated by, by
states:
1910_____________________________________
259
1920__________________________________________ 259
Tenants, owners, and managers, per cent of improved
land in farms operated by, for selected states: 1920... 288
Tenants and owners, average value of farm property per
farm, and per cent represented by land, for, in selected
states: 1920_______________________________________ 290
------number and per cent of, by age, for the North,
South, and West: 1920----------290'
------per cent distribution of value of live stock, by classes,
and average value per farm, for, in selected states: 1920. 291
------per cent of total value of farm property represented
b y each class, fo r, in the N o rth , South, and W est: 1920.
Tenure, per cent d is trib u tio n b y :
F a rm la n d (a ll), b y states—
1910____________________________________________
1920_______________________________ — .................
Farm ers, colored—
B y states: 1920_________________________________
I n th e S ou th: 1 9 0 0 -1 9 2 0 ............................ ..........
-------, w h ite —
"
B y states: 1920_________________________________
I n th e S ou th: 1900-1920................... .......................
Farm s, num ber of, b y states—
1910____ ________________________________________
1920___________________________________ _____ _
Farm s and fa rm acreage, fo r the N o rth , South, and
W est: 1920________________________________________
Farm s in th e U n ite d States: 1880-1920_____________
Tobacco, p ro d u ctio n of, 15 leading states: 1919 and 1909.
T o ta l area in farm s, center o f: 1850-1920________________
Tuberculosis o f th e lungs and Tuberculosis, a ll oth er
form s. See D e ath rates.
T u m o r. S e e D e ath rates.
T y p h o id fever. S ee D eath rates.

292

255
255
260
260
260
260
254
254
292
2601
282:
137

476

STATISTICAL ATLAS.
Plate N o .

Unimproved and improved land in farms, and land not in
farms:
By states: 1920 and 1910________________________
In the United States: 1850-1920_________________.
Unimproved land area in farms, relative proportion of im­
proved and, to the total land area of the United States:
1850-1920_______
United States, geographic divisions: 1920_______________
------ original area and acquisitions of territory: 1790-1920
Urban and rural population: 1880-1920________________
Urban population:
Center of: 1910 and 1920________________________
Increase in, by classes of cities: 1890-1920_________
Per cent in tqtal population, by states—
1890_______________________________________
1900...._______
1910............................
1920_______________________________________
1890-1920..._____
1920 and 1910______________________________
Urban territory in 1910, per cent of increase in population
of, by states: 1900-1910___________________________
------ in 1920, per cent of increase in population of, by
states: 1910-1920_________ ________ __________ _____
Value, average, of all farm crops per farm, by states: 1919
and 1909...........
------ average, per acre of crops with acreage reports, by
states: 1919 and 1909_____________________________■_
Value added by manufacture, by states: 1919 and 1914.
Value of implements and machinery, per acre of improved
land in farms, by states: 1920______________________
------ live stock, per acre of all land in farms, by states:
1920_____________________ _____ _________ _________
Value of products, agriculture:
By states: 1920_________ . ______________________
Dairy products sold by farmers in 1919____________
Farm crops, all, by states—
1909__________
1919 and 1909____
Vegetables raised for sale,12 leading states: 1919___
------ manufactures:
All manufactured and proportional value—
For each geographic division: 1919, 1914, 1909,
1904, and 1899____________________________
For each group: 1919, 1914, 1909, 1904, and
1899—______
By states—
1919._______
1919 and 1914........... ................................. ..............
Groups of industries: 1919, 1914, and 1909________




241
241
239
2
1
143
121
143
141
141
140
140
142
139
144
144
280
280
344
253
253
252
276
279
279
282
342
345
350
343
346

Plate N o .

Value of products, manufactures—Continued.
Leading industries: 1919 and 1914________________
------mining industries:
By states—
1919.........................................
1919,1909,1902____
Leading industries—
By states—
1909._____
1919__________________
In 1919, 1909, and 1902_____________________
Per cent distribution of—
By geographic divisions: 1919________________
By mining industries: 1919__________________
Vegetables raised for sale, value of, 12 leading states: 1919.
Violent deaths. Se e Death rates.
Wage earners, average number:
By industries employing over 40,000 wage earners:
1919 and 1914_________________________________
By states: 1919 and 1914____ ___________________
Wales. S e e England, etc.
Wheat production:
Center of: 1850-1920____________________________
15 leading states: 1919 and 1909__________________
In 1919________________________________
In United States: 1849-1919_____________________
White farm tenants and owners, in the South, by age: 1920.
White farmers, foreign-born, in the United States, by
country of birth: 1920 and 1910____________________
------per eent distribution by tenure, by states: 1920____
------per cent of farm land operated by tenants, by states:
1920________________________________________
------per cent operating rented farms, by states: 1920
White farmers in the South, per cent distribution, by
tenure: 1900-1920______________________
White population, per cent of native white of native par­
entage in, by states:
19 10 .......................
1920____________________
------total, distribution by age periods and sex for certain
principal population classes: 1920_______
Whooping cough. Se e Death rates.
Women, foreign white, 21 years of age and over, born in
specified countries or groups of countries, citizenship of:
1920..........................
See also Females.
Wool produced on farms, 16 leading states: 1919andl909_
Yiddish and Hebrew, distribution of foreign white stock
having specified mother tongues, for selected states:
1920 and 1910.................
Zinc. S e e Lead, etc.

A D D IT IO N A L C OPIES
OT THI3 PUBLICATION HAT BE PBOCUBED EBOM
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUM
ENTS
GOVERNMENT PRINTING O
FFICE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
AT
$2.00 P E R C O P Y

V

347
352
351
354
353
352
351
352
282
349
348
137
281
284
281
264
264
260
262
261
260
147
147
191
212
277
210