View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Ohio Council on Economic Education
Economic Policvr Issues for the 1990$

Akron, Ohio
November 7, "1.990
W. Lee Hoskins

I.

Introduction

A.

As 1990 draws to a close, it has proved to be a very interesting and
challenging one for the FederalReserve (the Fed lias not beeriwithout its
critics)

sis has caused people to look to monetary

lx

B.

II.

This afternoon,I want to respond to these obiections and argtre that the Fed
should have a primary, overiiding responsibility - protectiõn of the value of
the currency

The Foundatio_n for Monetary Policy - The Federal Reserve Act
A. Act of Congress
1. establishes a broad framework for conduct of monetary policy
2. calls for 2 policymaking bodies within the Federal Resérve
a. seven member Board
d in Washington, D.C.
b. Federal Open Market Col
, includes thé Board,
President-of NY Fed, and 4 of the other 11. regional Reserve Bank

¡resi
2.
B.

"r:rl
stments need to be made in the policy

Goal for monetarv n

1.

"maintain ldnþ
commensurate

i,,
IIL

Lessons ofthe 1970s and 1980s

A.

Found otrt that could not control

o,

-2-

B.

Importance of exnectations
L. ^ correct expfanation of relationship between inflation and
unemploytment depends on expeôtations of inflation
2. trading oÏf a little inflation for ieduced unemployment involves
surprising people or violating expectations
3. and becaüsè qtiople will not 6e "fooled" indefinitely, repeated attempts
for such a tradeoÏf will only result in inflation

IV. Inflation is Costly and Leads to Recession

A.
B.

Excessive inflation leads to recessions
monetary policy that is too expansionary will eventually lead to a rise
in the raÉebf inhation
eventually the Fed must tighten that may lead to a recession

1.
2.

Even
1.
2.

3.

4.
V.

resources devoted to protecting against inflation ís wasteful in that
takes resources away-from procluõing real goods and services

it

The Oil Price Shock

A.

Many believe that monetary po
becaûse it causes inflation ánd,
1.. all but one of the I rpost-

2.

e shock

oil price

shock

Iraq's irwasion of Kuwait and consequent UN embargo has seemed to
touõh off another round
prices
a. soaring oil -stock
b. declinðs in
and bond prices
c. renewedspeculationabout-economicrecession
about the shock's impact on prices and

cnsrs

a.

t, output declines because of fewer energy
rlse
th and income derived by wealth (decline
alances)
on their perception of the length of the

if it is

1.
2.

levels
ry income loss
nterest rates
loss
to correspond with smaller budsets
and reafinterest rates relativelliunchanged

-3-

C. How
1.

ary policy react?
pérèeiveä as a short term effect (expected real interest
the case during the Iranian revolution (7979) and
raq war (1980-81)

to brine interest rates down
tempoíary and the Fed does not
eveñtualþ return to the

2.

If the sho

e an

reversed
a. this

ongoing phenomenon, not soon to be

est rates do irõt rise)

b.

c'
3.
VI.

available

In fact, an easing monetary policy will only exacerbate the situation

Past Reactions to a Slowing Economy

A.
B.

-

The Inflation-Recession Cycle

The economy is slowing and there are pressures for the Fed to ease monetary

policy

How should mone-tary policy react? -- Above all else, should protect the
long-term value of thé c-urreñcy -- price stability or zero inflation
xist?

will always exist that the Fed cannot do

monetary policy
not have recessions induced
inate it

VII. Appropriate Objective for Monetary Policy --Zero Inflation

A.

inflation rate of zero will reduce any uncertainty associated with inflation

B,

credibility in the Fed's policy is important since expectations can olav a
powerfufrole; unforturiately, credibility can only b^e established oieí time

(not everyone will understand whyinflation is4%o)

:",t¡j:ttt;?i,äS*g""åltii"'

-+

MII.Conclusion

A.
B.

Accept the limitations of discretionary monetary policy

It is time to dismiss the wrongheaded notion that money should be thrown at
our problems
1. ' oil shock
2. sluggish growth

C, We
legi
1.2.

overriding goal of p
W for the Federal Re

riment conducive

to

a

th