View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

s




h ih r a ry

,J |jj

Ö tOO*“

STATEMENT ON
federal deposit mm
rnoonnA^.

vUHPORA H ON

r

THE INVESTIGATION OF
VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES
IN FDIC-SUPERVISED BANKS

PRESENTED TO

COMMERCE, CONSUMER, AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE
of the
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

BY

THOMAS A. BROOKS, GENERAL COUNSEL
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

9:30a.m.
Tuesday, June 28, 1983
Room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building

Mr. Chairman:
On June 20, 1983, the FDIC provided some extensive
information to the Subcommittee staff responding to the
questions raised by your letter of June 1, 1983.

Therefore,

I will restrict my remarks to some brief observations and
answer any questions you may have.
The FDIC is vitally interested in the early detection
of apparent criminal violations by insured banks, their
customers, officers, directors and employees.

Early discovery

of such infractions limits the risk to the FDIC's deposit
insurance fund and aids in maintaining confidence in the
nation's banking system.

The FDIC's responsibility is, first

and foremost, to ensure that appropriate federal law enforce­
ment authorities are apprised of any potential violations of
federal criminal statutes in FDIC-supervised banks.

As a

matter of policy, we encourage bank managers to notify federal
and state law enforcement authorities of any misconduct that
may constitute a criminal violation.

In cases where banks

have failed to notify the authorities or are hesitant to do
so, the FDIC will make the appropriate notifications.

The

vehicle used is a referral-letter to a United States Attorney
transmitting a Report of Apparent Criminal Irregularity.
The full resources of the FDIC's examining staff and
liquidation staff are called upon to ensure that Federal
prosecutors are apprised of any potential criminal activity
that might have occurred in connection with the operations of




2
insured state nonmember banks or if discovered during the
liquidation of failed banks.
be adequate —

These resources are believed to

recognizing that the FDIC's primary purpose as

bank regulator is to enforce civil banking laws.

As a super­

visory agency, the FDIC has traditionally referred all criminal
cases to the federal investigative and prosecuting authorities.
The FDIC does not conduct criminal investigations, therefore,
criminal referrals to the Department of Justice generally
convey preliminary information about a suspected offense and
require the federal authorities to conduct any further investi­
gation .
As you have undoubtedly observed from the information we
submitted, we have made numerous referrals.
While the FDIC does not conduct criminal investigations,
if detailed information has been compiled in the course of a
bank examination, it is made available to the U.S. Attorney.
As a matter of policy, FDIC examiners in potential criminal
matters do not conduct interviews or attempt to determine the
motives or intentions of the individuals involved.

The United

States Attorney exercises prosecutorial discretion over all
potential federal violations in the respective district.

When

a criminal referral is received from the FDIC, the U.S. Attorney
decides whether or not to prosecute the matter.

If an investi-

Oation is initiated, FDIC officials will usually be consulted or
asked to provide additional information.




3
We believe the present system of criminal referrals as
practiced by the FDIC represents a fair balance between the
needs of federal prosecutors and the legitimate rights of
individuals to privacy in their financial dealings.

Accord­

ing to FBI statistics, federal investigations and conviction
of bank fraud and embezzlement cases have increased signif­
icantly in recent years.

The Justice Department's shifting

of investigative and prosecutorial resources to white collar
crime from other types of street crime, such as bank robbery,
is at least partially responsible for this trend and we support
the action wholeheartedly.
Mr. Chairman, we appreciate the opportunity to appear
before your Subcommittee and would be pleased to respond to
any questions you may have.