View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

REMARKS BY STEPHEN S, GARDNER
VICE CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

V

BEFORE THE
TENNESSTE BANKERS

ASSOCIATION

ii

86TH ANNUAL CONVENTION
NASHVILLE,
G

M

TENNESSEE

MAY 25, 1976
OOD MORNING:

•
I AM VERY HAPPY TO BE HERE FOR A PERSONAL REASON
A

ND FOR A SOMEWHAT DOCTRINAIRE REASON,

THIRTY FOUR YEARS

AG

O CONNIE AND I WERE MARRIED IN CHRIST CHURCH HERE IN
NASHVILLE, WE MOVED INTO AN APARTMENT IN DONALDSON AND
HELPED THE 12TH ARMORED DIVISION ON MANEUVERS RUIN SOME

0FR
A

YOUR BEST

FARMLAND

AROUND MURFREESBORO,

CHANCE TO APOLOGIZE UNTIL TODAY,

§I •
^

I HAVE NOT HAD

THE SECOND REASON IS JUST

CURIOUS INTEREST IN A GREAT PRESIDENT, ANDREW JACKSON.

HISTORY GIVES HIM SOME HIGH MARKS WITH WHICH I MUST AGREE,
°N THE OTHER HAND, WHEN HE REFUSED TO RENEW THE CHARTER OF
T

H E SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES IN PHILADELPHIA A LOT

° F EASTERN ESTABLISHMENT TYPES THINK THAT HE WAS AWFULLY
^ONG.

I

AT LEAST THE GOOD CITIZENS OF PHILADELPHIA DID AT
•

T

H E TIME,

T

H A T THERE WAS AN IMPORTANT PROBLEM AND ADDRESSED

SERIOUSLY, YOUR PRESIDENT CORRECTLY

HIS TYPICAL COLORFUL AND DYNAMIC WAY,

PERCEIVED
IT IN

UNFORTUNATELY, HIS

IDEAS PREVAILED AND AS I SAID HE WAS WRONG ON THE ISSUE.
*T IS EVEN POSSIBLE TO CONCLUDE, THROUGH A TORTUROUS
ft

'

.

'

'.

ANALYSIS, THAT THESE EVENTS ARE AT LEAST IN PART THE GENESIS
OF MANY OF THE PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE SEE IN OUR BANKING SYSTEM

-2R

ODAY.

I DON'T REALLY SUBSCRIBE TO THAT VIEW BUT IT IS FUN

THINK THAT WHAT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED IF WE HAD HAD FEDERAL
CHARTERING OF BANKS AND AN INDEPENDENT MONETARY AUTHORITY
L

IKE THE FEDERAL RESERVE FROM 1830 ON,

1

IF THAT HAD HAPPENED

SUSPECT BANKERS WOULD HAVE A BETTER REPUTATION,
ONE THING WE CAN SAY, HOWEVER, IS THAT AMERICA WAS

AN ISSUES-ORIENTED SOCIETY THEN AND STILL IS IN 1976.
B

AND

ANKING ISSUES SEEM TO BE JUST AS SENSITIVE AND JUST AS CONs

T

ROVERSIAL AS THEY WERE IN JACKSON'S TIME.

I THINK THAT'S WHY

THE LAST THREE YEARS CONGRESS HAS MADE MANY SERIOUS EFFORTS
T

0 ADDRESS BANKING ISSUES,

I NEED NOT REPEAT THEM DEFINITA -

T

IVELY FOR YOU BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ALLUDE TO THEM GENERALLY.

STRUCTURAL REFORM IS PROBABLY NEEDED AND PROBABLY WILL COME,
ALTHOUGH THE FIA OF 1975 AND THE FINANCIAL REFORM ACT OF
1975 ARE STILL, FOR THE TIME BEING, STALLED IN THE LEGISLAT E ,

I EXPRESSED THIS THOUGHT IN A DIFFERENT FORUM RECENTLY,

THERE IS JUST TOO MUCH DISSATISFACTION WITH THE STATUS QUO
T

O NOT EXPECT IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE RULES GOVERNING THE

STRUCTURE AND POWERS OF DEPOSITORY
•

INSTITUTIONS,

• UNDERLYING THIS DISSATISFACTION,

IT IS CLEAR, IS

THE FACT THAT IN A GROWING AND CHANGING INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY
IT IS THAT SOCIETY THAT IS THE REAL ARBITRATOR OF THE KIND
OF FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND SERVICES THAT THE NATION WILL
HAVE,

WHEN ONE CONSIDERS THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TYPICALLY

AVAILABLE TO INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES AT THE END OF WORLD
WAR II AND COMPARES THEM WITH THE VARIETY AND TYPES OF

-3~
SERVICES AVAILABLE TODAY/
T

I THINK MY ARGUMENT IS SECURE,

HIS TREND HAS ONLY MODESTLY BEEN AIDED BY FEDERAL LEGIS-

LATIVE CHANGE,

IT HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED MORE DYNAMICALLY

IN

THE REGIONAL ACTIVITIES OF STATE LEGISLATURES AND STATE
NANKING COMMISSIONS,

IT IS STILL GOING ON,

ONE GROUP OF

STATES HAS PETITIONED THE FEDERAL REGULATORS

REQUESTING

BELIEF FROM THE INTEREST RATE DIFFERENTIAL FOR COMMERCIAL
B

ANKS AND CITING THE UNIQUE COMPETITIVE POWERS OF THRIFTS
X

WITHIN THEIR BORDERS,

THE DIVERSITY OF STRUCTURE AND TYPE

PERMISSIBLE ACTIVITIES ALLOWED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN
°UR 50 STATES IS NOT EASY TO RATIONALIZE,

WE OBVIOUSLY DO

NOT HAVE A SINGLE FORM OF NATIONAL FINANCIAL STRUCTURE,

I

HOPE THESE TRENDS WILL CONTINUE AND THAT IS BASED ON MY
BELIEF THAT ONLY THROUGH INNOVATION AND CHANGE WILL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BE ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH SOCIETY'S DEMANDS.
I THINK THE PARTISAN FIGHTS IN THE HALLS OF CONGRESS OVER
STRUCTURAL REFORM OFTEN OVERLOOK THE KEY LESSON OF HISTORY,
ONE CAN NEVER LEGISLATE :THE STATUS QUO, AND AT THE PRESENT
TIME, THERE IS GREAT DISSATISFACTION WITH THE STATUS QUO.
- I HAVE BEEN TALKING BASICALLY ABOUT STRUCTURAL
REFORM,

I THINK THAT IS FIRST IN A PROPER ORDER OF PRIORI-

TIES BECAUSE OF MY CONVICTION THAT REGULATORY AGENCY REFORM
SHOULD BEGIN WITH A CONSENSUS VIEW, NOT ONLY OF WHAT KIND OF
A SYSTEM OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WE SHOULD HAVE, BUT ALSO,
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHAT WE PERCEIVE TO BE THE WEAKNESSES

-4AND STRENGTHS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM,

OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE A

UNIQUE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES,
B

IT IS MY

ELIFF THAT WE HAVE A VERY COMPETITIVE SYSTEM,

IT IS ALSO

NY BELIEF THAT CONCENTRATION HAS NOT PROCEEDED A PACE IN THE
F

INANCIAL INDUSTRY AS IT MAY HAVE IN OTHER CORPORATE FORMS,

T

HE SHEER NUMBER OF OUR BANKS AND THRIFT INSTITUTIONS AND

CREDIT UNIONS -- DON'T FORGET CREDIT UNIONS, THERE ARE 23,009
THEM —

AND THEY PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE AND GROWING TYPE OF

FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARY SERVICE TO THEIR MEMBERS, IS DIFFERENT
T

HAN MOST OTHER INDUSTRIES.

F

IRST TIER, SAY THE 200 LARGEST REGIONAL BANKS, IT SEEMS TO

THE CAPABILITIES OF BANKS IN THE

^E, ARE MORE EQUAL TODAY THAN THEY WERE 30 YEARS AGO.

THIS

HAS COME NOT ONLY FROM ELECTRONICS AND OTHER MECHANICAL
C

HANGE BUT ALSO FROM THE GREAT INTER-REGIONAL MIGRATION OF

POPULATION, MANUFACTURE, AND COMMERCE,

THE HUNT COMMISSION

REPORT COMMENTED ON THE UNIQUENESS OF AMERICA'S SYSTEM SIX
Y

EARS AGO,

THAT WAS NOT ENOUGH APPARENTLY,

THUS if is STILL

NECESSARY TO FIND A PUBLIC CONSENSUS UNDERSTANDING TO GUIDE
T

H E LAWMAKERS,

I SUGGEST WE CAN BEST DO THIS BY COMPARING

OUR BANKING SYSTEM BOTH WITH THE PAST AND WITH THE SYSTEMS
IN THE OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED

DEMOCRACIES.

REGULATORY REFORM WHICH COINCIDES WITH STRUCTURAL
REFORM AND IS BASED ON A RESPONSIBLE MAJORITY VIEW OF THE
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR SYSTEM WILL PROBABLY BE A LOT BETTER REGULATORY REFORM THAN OTHERWISE MIGHT

-5EMERGE.

THIS IS THE REASON I TESTIFIED YESTERDAY ON A SERIES

REGULATORY REFORM MEASURES BEFORE THE SENATE THAT WOULD
SUBJECT ALL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORS TO A SCHEDULED FOUROR FIVE- YEAR REVIEW,

THE STATED PURPOSE OF THE EFFORT IS TO

DEDUCE THE BURDEN OF REGULATION ON THE ECONOMY AND TO ASSURE
T

HAT COMPETITIVENESS EXISTS IN OUR INDUSTRY AND TRADE AND

T

HAT THE CONSUMER, WHO IS ALL OF US, IS PROTECTED FROM MONOP-

OLISTIC AND CARTEL-LIKE COMPETITION THAT MAINTAINS HIGHER
^ I C E S AND COSTS THAN WOULD OTHERWISE OBTAIN,

AS AN ISSUES-

°RJENTED SOCIETY THAT TYPICALLY HAS ADDRESSED PROBLEMS
INDIVIDUALLY AND APPLIED REGULATION NARROWLY TO CORRECT A
PERCEIVED INEQUITY WE HAVE NOT ALWAYS FOCUSED ON THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF ECONOMIC PROBLEMS,
UH"

"THERE OUGHT TO BE A

IS AN AMERICAN IDIOM, EXPRESSING OUR NATIONAL PREOCCUPA-

TION WITH THE IDEA THAT WE CAN CORRECT EVERY PROBLEM BY AN
ORDINANCE,

ACTUALLY WE CAN ALSO CREATE A COMPLEXITY OF

FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS SUCH THAT THE SHEER VOLUME OF
CONTROLS MAY BE OR WILL 'BECOME UNMANAGEABLE,

A FREE SOCIETY

INCURS SOME RISKS AND PARTICULARLY A SOCIETY AS SENSITIVE
AND AS SOCIALLY AWARE AS AMERICANS,
REDUCE THOSE RISKS TO A MINIMUM,

WE MUST STRIVE TO

BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE

A GROWING UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT THAT MAYBE WE OUGHT TO
LOOK AT ALL OF THE REGULATIONS THAT WE HAVE VISITED ON THE
NATION AND THE UNINTENDED EFFECTS OF THESE REGULATIONS ON
OTHER VALUABLE SOCIAL GOALS,

-6I AM IMPRESSED WITH THE BI-PARTISAN SPONSORSHIP OF
T

HE PERCY-BYRD BILL AND ADMINISTRATION PROPOSAL AND THE COM-

PAN I ON BILLS.
IN T H

TH.rs IS THE KIND OF EFFORT THAT BUILDS ALLIANCES

E BEGINNING BEHIND A CONCEPT THAT WILL BE TESTED SEVERELY

W

HEN SPECIFIC MEASURES ARE DEBATED, WITHOUT SUCH "GOING IN"

J

0INING OF HANDS THERE WOULD BE LITTLE OPPORTUNITY TO REPEL

ORGANIZED ATTACKS ON SPECIFIC PLANS,
0NLY

°SHA

AGENCY REFORM BUT INTERAGENCY

AND I HOPE THIS IS NOT

INTERACTION REFORM,

THUS

AND EPA REGULATIONS, FOR EXAMPLE, WILL BE REVIEWED NOT

°NLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR SPECIFIC GOALS AND ALSO IN THE
C

°NTEXT OF HOW THEY EFFECT JOBS AND SMALL BUSINESS AND THE

ECONOMY AND OUR OTHER SOCIAL GOALS,
YOU KNOW ALL ABOUT THE STRUCTURAL REFORM MEASURES
W

HICH I HAVE MENTIONED AND REGULATORY AGENCY REFORM PROPOSALS

T0

CHANGE THE ORGANIZATION OF FEDERAL REGULATORS OF FINANCIAL

INSTITUTIONS,

AND THE PROPOSALS THAT AFFECT ANOTHER OF OUR

&ASIC RESPONSIBILITIES, THE CONSUMER PROTECTION LEGISLATION IN
T

HE FINANCIAL AREA THAT HAS RECENTLY BEEN EXPANDED,

C

OUPLE THIS THRUST FOR CHANGE WITH A PERCY-BYRD OR ADMINIS-

IF YOU

TRATION BILL WHICH WILL SUBJECT EVERY FEDERAL REGULATOR AND HIS
REGULATION TO A FOUR- OR FIVE- YEAR COMPREHENSIVE
P

PROGRAM'

OR INTENSIVE REVIEW AND ANALYSIS YOU HAVE A POWERFUL

TIVE FOR CHANGE.

INITIA-

I DO NOT DOUBT THAT THERE WILL BE SOME

DRAMATIC AND INTERESTING NEW DEVELOPMENTS FOR FINANCIAL
TUTIONS,

INSTI-

AND I HOPE THAT AS THIS EFFORT PROCEEDS THE BANKING

INSTITUTIONS AND THE THRIFT INSTITUTIONS WILL NOT CONTINUE TO
MARCH UP TO THE HILL AND ADDRESS ONLY NARROW PARTISAN

INTEREST,

•

1

UNDERSTAND THAT THEY MUST ADDRESS THEIR OWN INTEREST, AMD

1

EXPECT THEM

L

TO, THAT IS PART OF THE SYSTEM, BUT I WOULD

IKE TO SEE THEM ALSO EXPAND THEIR virws AND ADDRESS THE

LOADER

ISSUES,

I KNOW THIS IS DIFFICULT,

YOU HAVE A MEM-

BERSHIP THAT DOES NOT EXPECT AGREEMENTS ON SOMETHING THAT
CANNOT BE PRECISELY AND DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE INTEREST OF
TRADE ASSOCIATION CONCERNED,
WEAKNESS•

CONGRESS

BUT I THINK THAT THAT IS A

IS RESPONSIVE TO ITS CONSTITUENTS —

THEY

NEED TO HEAR FROM EXPERT WITNESSES NOT ONLY ON ISSUES AS NARROW
A

$ INTERSTATE TAXATION OF DEPOSITORIES, BUT ALSO ON THE SUB-

J

ECTS AS BROAD AS ALL REGULATORY

REFORM,

THE ECONOMY MAY BE GROWING BETTER THAN EVEN THE
M

°ST OPTIMISTIC ANALYSES

IN THE SHORT RUN,

THE LONGER RANGE

^ O B L E M S ; UNEMPLOYMENT, PRODUCTIVITY, CAPITAL FORMATION,
ENERGY CONVERSION, LARGE GOVERNMENT DEFICITS, AND
ARE STILL TO BE RESOLVED,

INFLATION

I SUGGEST THAT A COMPREHENSIVE

REGULATORY REFORM REVIEW CAN BE USEFUL TO THE RESOLUTION OF
T

HESE ISSUES.

IN THE MOST UTOPIAN VIEW WE CAN GET RID OF

^ I N T E N D E D AND DEBILITATING SIDE EFFECTS FROM PRESENT LAW
AND REGULATION.

WE MAY EVEN GET RID OF BAD LAW PERHAPS,

ALTHOUGH I'M NOT TOO OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THAT,
T

BUT SURELY

HIS IS ALSO A PROCESS OF NATIONAL EDUCATION THAT WILL HELP

IDENTIFY PRIORITIES AND BALANCE THEM IN FULL VIEW OF THE
ELECTORATE,

ALL OF THIS WILL BE A VERY POLITICALLY

DIFFICULT

PROGRAM BUT JUST AS IMPORTANT TO THE TENNESSEE BANKER'S
ASSOCIATION AS REGULATION Q OR THE FTC DECISION ON THE
LIABILITIES OF A HOLDER IN DUE COURSE.

I AM SURE YOU WILL HAVE A GOOD CONVENTION AND I AM
^ L I G H T E D TO HAVE BEEN ABLE TO JOIN YOU,
B

I THINK I WILL GO

Y THE HERMITAGE THIS AFTERNOON ON MY WAY OUT OF TOWN,

FROM

WHAT ANDREW JACKSON SAID WHEN HE OPPOSED GRANTING CONTROL OF
THE CURRENCY TO THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT, I THINK HE WOULD BE
PLEASED THAT MONETARY POLICY IS IN THE HANDS OF THE FEDERAL
RESERVE,
THANK YOU,