View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Before the Wallenberg Forum at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
September 28, 1999

Year 2000: Ninety-Four Days and Counting
Good morning. My topic today is a timely one--the Year 2000. My comments will focus on
the readiness of the financial services industry in the United States and the significant work
and coordination that have occurred globally to prepare for the century change. The century
date change poses considerable risk and is a major challenge for all sectors both public and
private. Although U.S. financial market authorities established specific and aggressive
deadlines for their industries to prepare for the century date change, in the final analysis, the
boards of directors and senior management of firms are responsible for ensuring that their
organizations are prepared for the Year 2000. We turn to them, ultimately, to ensure that
their firms are able to conduct business and provide uninterrupted services after the century
date change.
Increased Confidence in Readiness of U.S. Financial Industry and Other Sectors
With only ninety-four days remaining before the century rollover, I believe that the U.S.
financial sector is ready. My assessment is based on publicly available facts and information
developed by supervisors and industry participants. More than 99 percent of the
approximately 22,000 federally insured depository institutions and credit unions have
demonstrated to examining supervisors that they have completed preparations for the Year
2000, tested their mission-critical systems and put them into production. Securities and
futures brokers, dealers, and markets have completed or are completing Y2K-readiness
certifications, and both industries have participated in large-scale "street" tests during which
literally hundreds of thousands of forward-dated transactions were processed on exchanges
and then cleared and settled using automated systems that simulate the century rollover at
their depositories and clearing houses. These tests revealed Y2K errors at a level of
something less than one-tenth of 1 percent, and all were quickly corrected. In fact, the
testing tools now being used are so thorough that in many cases non-Y2K program bugs
have been identified in existing programs and systems, and I am happy to report that they
have been eradicated as well.
Retail and wholesale payment systems--a vital part of the financial sector and one in which
the Federal Reserve is a major service provider--are engaged in a similar process. I can
assure you that the Federal Reserve has not spared any effort in preparing its internal
systems and the financial services and products we provide to financial institutions for the
Year 2000. We have completed Y2K preparations for our services and products, and in June
1998, we opened a testing facility for our customers. To date, more than 9,000 financial
institutions have tested the services they use with the Federal Reserve. These represent all of
our major customers in terms of transaction volume and dollar amount of the items
processed through the Federal Reserve. We also have tested the automated payment
services we provide to federal agencies such as the Social Security Administration to ensure

that banks can receive government payments and then post the deposits to their customers'
accounts. The New York Clearing House, in particular, and other private commercial entities
that process wholesale and retail payments have followed testing programs similar to ours.
No one can say with certainty that there won't be any problems or disruptions during the
century rollover. However, based upon the information I have shared with you, we expect
that any disruptions or glitches in the United States that do occur will be minor and of limited
duration. Moreover, because there is an expectation that something somewhere will go
wrong, the financial sector--from the regulators to the markets and payment systems to the
smallest introducing broker or bank branch--is preparing contingency plans.
I would also like to emphasize that a percentage of automated systems are down every day
without causing serious disruptions to commercial transactions and markets. For example, 1
to 2 percent of ATM machines in the United States are down at any given moment--some
simply because they are out of paper--yet consumers know to go down the block to another
machine or into the bank branch or local supermarket to obtain the cash they need. Even
more serious disruptions periodically occur: The New York Stock Exchange and, only last
month, the Chicago Board of Trade computers have experienced glitches that caused their
markets to close temporarily without causing serious disruption to the U.S. financial markets.
In all of these situations, Americans react with typical aplomb: They prioritize and address
the most serious safety and well-being issues first, and they usually are willing to tolerate
some inconveniences and delays related to less-critical needs.
Increase in Readiness Information and Readiness of Other Domestic Sectors
As I said earlier, my assessment of the financial services sector is based on publicly available
facts and information. Even as late as this spring, Y2K information about firms and
industries was largely sketchy or incomplete throughout the world. In many countries, few
firms or sectors were willing to provide information about the Year 2000 process or their
status relative to national and international benchmarks. Failure to disclose caused
considerable concern in markets. Market participants began to assume that firms and sectors
that were not making some type of self disclosure probably were seriously behind in their
preparations for the Year 2000. This assumption engendered the potential for overreaction
by market participants and consumers, including the potential for withdrawal from markets
and commercial relationships and other rational and irrational risk-mitigation techniques.
I believe that the potential for overreaction has been greatly reduced in recent months
because of a dramatic improvement in disclosure and confirmation of readiness through
multiparty testing.
First, in the United States, the President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion, led by John
Koskinen, forged unique and successful cooperative partnerships between critical public
agencies and related private sectors and made those sectors accountable to the American
public through the quarterly release of sector assessment reports. The President's Council,
established in February 1998, is made up of more than 30 major federal agencies that act as
sector coordinators in promoting Year 2000 public and private sector action within their
respective policy areas. Quite simply, the President's Council has spurred the government
and whole industries to coordinate Y2K preparations, set benchmark dates for readiness, and
organize and report the results of inter- and cross-industry tests.
The electric power and telecommunication industries, which are critical to the operation of
the financial services industry, are excellent examples of this achievement. Neither industry
is supervised in the way that the financial services industry is, yet their umbrella

agencies--the Department of Energy and the Federal Communications Commission--were
able to energize industry-led groups such as the North American Electric Reliability Council
(NERC) and the Network Reliability and Interoperability Council (NRIC). The results of
their efforts can be read in the assessment report released by the President's Council last
month. As of June 1999, electric power distribution companies' serving 96 percent of the
nation's electricity needs were ready for the Year 2000. Similarly, as of July 1999,
long-distance telecommunications carriers controlling 92 percent of domestic calls were 99
percent Y2K compliant.
Second, regulators and private-sector firms have been exerting pressure on market
participants and commercial firms to provide information about Y2K readiness. Banks and
broker-dealers have been required by their regulators to communicate with customers about
their Y2K programs and readiness. Moreover, financial institutions, which have a duty to
assess and manage the Year 2000 risk, have been seeking Y2K disclosure from major
customers and counter parties. If these entities are publicly traded companies, they are
required by the SEC to address Y2K readiness in their quarterly filings. Private-sector
groups, such as the Global Year 2000 Co-ordinating Group made up of global banking and
financial services firms, have been very active in prodding market participants to publish
information about their own readiness. The Global 2000 Group has also been instrumental in
encouraging countries to produce information about the readiness of key sectors within their
borders.
Third, we've seen increasing efforts by the media to provide factual and balanced reports on
the Year 2000. I think you'll agree that the press is now reporting the good news as well as
the "what if" pieces. The Federal Reserve and our sister agencies plan to engage the media
in an ongoing conversation about the financial services industry through the rollover period.
We expect intensive media coverage during the rollover period, and the President's Council
will be running a national Information Coordination Center, supplemented by reports from
agencies and industry members, that will provide the public with accurate, timely, and
complete information about the operation of critical sectors in the United States.
These disclosure initiatives, assisted by legislation that avoids liability for Year 2000
disclosure statements made in good faith, literally have opened the gates of information and
offer a powerful antidote to any Y2K gloom-and-doom stories generated by the media.
Year 2000 Market Indicators and Federal Reserve Monetary Preparations
Over the next few months and through the first part of the new year, the Federal Reserve,
like other central banks, may be facing some unusual, but not unmanageable, challenges in
carrying out its responsibility to meet market demands for currency, reserves, and liquidity
more generally. We already have seen signs of heightened demands for liquidity and safety
in the United States. The Federal Reserve expects banks and other financial intermediaries
to have reasonable plans in place to manage cash and liquidity and provide for contingencies
over the century date change. However, we also recognize our responsibility to assure that
adequate overall levels of liquidity are available and to provide a backstop to the financial
system.
The Federal Reserve has a number of tools available to effectuate monetary policy and to
satisfy market liquidity needs. For example, we use our open market operations to provide
liquidity by entering the market to buy or sell government and agency securities. Recently,
we created several new tools to help fine-tune our open market operations and reassure
market participants that adequate liquidity will be available when needed. First, we

lengthened the maximum term of our repurchase agreements, up to ninety from sixty days;
this is a permanent change in our operations. Second, we are willing to accept a broader
range of collateral in repurchase transactions, such as pass-through mortgage securities of
government-sponsored enterprises. Third, we will be selling options on overnight repurchase
agreement transactions for exercise on specific days in December 1999 and January 2000;
the details on this are still being worked out. These latter programs have been authorized
only for the Y2K period. We have seen recent butterfly spreads and other measures of Y2K
pressures in U.S. markets respond positively to the announcement of these tools.
Even with the flexibility provided by these tools, if the markets become more volatile, it may
be difficult to forecast aggregate reserve demand and supply, engendering the potential for
an unexpected shortfall in reserves. Moreover, it is possible that the distribution of liquidity
will become uneven--some banks may receive increased deposits and be flush with funds
while others may experience unexpected shortfalls. And many banks could experience
unusual loan demands related to the Y2K needs of their customers. Broadly speaking,
uncertainties about Y2K have given rise to a general reluctance among lenders to extend
unsecured credit over the year-end. At the same time, borrowers are trying to lock-in
funding now for the year-end rather than face the possibility of high interest rates or market
disruptions. To help meet unusual funding and liquidity needs during the period around the
century date change, the Federal Reserve has created a special liquidity facility as an
adjunct to its discount window programs.
The special liquidity facility will be open from October 1, 1999 through April 7, 2000. It will
be available to depository institutions operating in the United States and in sound financial
condition. Loans must be adequately collateralized and will be made at a penalty rate of 150
basis points above the FOMC's targeted federal funds rate. In contrast to subsidized
adjustment credit, which will still be available, borrowers under the SLF will not be required
to first seek credit from market sources, and the usage of borrowed funds will not be limited
or monitored. Moreover, loans can be outstanding for any period while the facility is open.
The Federal Reserve's special liquidity facility is similar to the so-called "Lombard"credit
facilities offered by a number of European central banks. We do not intend for any
supervisory or market stigma to be attached to use of the facility; if it does, then the
potential for this facility to ease Y2K liquidity needs may not be fully realized. If banks are
willing to utilize the facility, it should help to maintain orderly markets and to cap the federal
funds rate in those markets.
One final point about liquidity-- as I said above, we expect payment mechanisms to function
smoothly. However, it is possible that currency demands will increase over the next few
months. The Federal Reserve is prepared to meet any currency demands that may arise, and
we are taking a number of steps to ensure that cash is stored at numerous sites around the
country to allow banks to meet any sudden or unexpected spikes in the currency needs of
their customers.
International Efforts and Readiness Abroad
On the international front, we have seen tremendous progress in the awareness of the Year
2000 issue. Most countries now have Y2K national coordinators and are providing more
information about their efforts. Again, the financial services sector abroad leads all others in
preparedness. The international telecommunications industry also appears ready, and service
should be reliable between major cities. This progress again can be traced to a number of
public and private-sector initiatives.

United Nations Cooperation Center
Earlier this year, the United Nations Committee on Informatics held two highly successful
meetings for national Y2K coordinators. The meetings were designed to promote awareness
and provide tools for coordinators to use to organize domestic Year 2000 programs. At the
second meeting held in June, more than 170 countries were represented--more countries
than have ever attended a special UN meeting. The UN is encouraging countries to issue
disclosures about their Year 2000 programs and progress and has established a Year 2000
Cooperation Center, which is publishing readiness country reports disclosed by countries on
a web site. The Center will also publish reports on the impact of the date change on critical
sectors within countries during the rollover period. The web site provides information on the
status of key sectors within a country including the public infrastructure. Joint Year 2000
Council
In April 1998, a group of authorities on international financial market--the Joint Year 2000
Council--was established by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, the Committee
on Payment and Settlement Systems, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors,
and the International Organization of Securities Commissions. The council has provided the
key forum for Y2K communications among financial market authorities around the globe. To
date, more than 100 countries have participated in our activities. I chair the Joint Council,
and I am very proud of what we have achieved over the past year.
The Joint Council has issued a number of guidance papers to assist regulators in organizing
the Year 2000 efforts of the financial services industries within their countries. These papers
address the scope and impact of the Year 2000 challenge, the independent assessment of the
preparedness of financial institutions, testing, information sharing, and contingency planning.
In addition, the Joint Council issues bulletins summarizing recent developments and best
practices for supervisors. Most important, the Joint Council is completing a second round of
regional meetings that focus on contingency planning, event management, and public
communications strategies. These meetings provide an excellent opportunity for supervisors
to discuss common interests within specific geographic areas, to share information, and to
coordinate regional plans in anticipation of the rollover.
The Joint Council also serves as a point of contact for various national and international
private-sector initiatives. In this regard, it has established an External Consultative
Committee to enhance information-sharing between the public and private sectors. The ECC
includes representatives of internationally oriented organizations, including the International
Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the major cross-border financial utilities, such as
SWIFT, for making international payments and settling transactions. The council is now in
the process of establishing information sharing facilities for financial market authorities to
use during the rollover period.
Private-Sector Activity
In the international financial community, we have a highly active private sector that has
been effective in promoting the readiness of financial services firms and markets around the
globe. As I mentioned earlier, private sector groups, such as the Global 2000 Coordinating
Group, have been educating private sector executives and public sector officials about the
international interest in the readiness of key sectors in their countries that are critical to
international commerce, such as telecommunication, power, financial service, shipping and
transportation.
No one can declare with certainty how the millennium rollover will unfold internationally,

and much of my information is anecdotal. However, the financial service sector is generally
perceived to be better prepared than other sectors in almost every country. In general, I can
report that the financial firms of the developed countries, like those in the United States,
either are, or appear to be making good progress toward being, prepared. Similarly, the
financial institutions of a number of transitional economies are well advanced. The financial
institutions that are thought to have the furthest to go, in general, are those in countries that
are least dependent on technology. They have the greatest experience with frequent
disruptions of the type that one might expect during the changeover period and can most
easily return to manual workarounds or other contingency plans.
During 1999, the financial community organized a series of very successful cross-border
payment systems tests. Thirty-four separate national and international payments systems in
nineteen countries participated. More than 500 financial institutions successfully completed
simulated Year 2000 transactions on systems that were forward dated to simulate the
rollover. For these tests to be successful, the participants had to have completed all
necessary Year 2000 preparations to their internal systems. It therefore seems highly
unlikely that the payment systems will be the source of instability during the century date
change
Conclusion
Although much work has been done within the United States and around the globe in
anticipation of the century date change, we should not be complacent. There is still work to
be done in terms of contingency planning and public communication. The Federal Reserve
will continue its ongoing monitoring of progress. We also intend to have close contact with
the markets and financial institutions through the date change. While we cannot know with
certainty what the century rollover will bring, we should, based on what we know today,
experience a smooth transition, perhaps even business as usual.

Return to top
1999 Speeches
Home | News and events
Accessibility | Contact Us
Last update: September 28, 1999, 9:15 AM