View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Robert T. Parry, President
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Financial Community Lunch
Salt Lake City
For Delivery January 7, 1993 - 1 2 :0 0 Noon MST

A P o l i c y m a k e r ’s P e r s p e c t i v e o n t h e U.S. E c o n o m y

I.

Thank you. It’s a pleasure to be here.
A.

B.

My topic today is the outlook for the national economy. As you know,
for almost four years, we’ve had sluggish growth followed by an actual
contraction followed by more sluggish growth.
1.

Now, a lot of issues about this economic performance were
discussed during the seminar President-elect Clinton held in Little
Rock last month.

2.

About 350 people talked about the economy for two solid days.

Well, I’m just one policymaker, with about 20 minutes here at the
podium, so I’m going to focus on just three issues.
1.

But these are issues that are especially important to you in the
banking community and to us at the Fed.

C.

The first issue is the importance of a healthy economy to the banking
industry’s performance.

D.

The second issue is whether the economy has finally turned the corner.
1.

My short answer is: yes, I think it has, and I expect growth to
continue for at least the next year or so,
a.

E.

but I also don’t expect it to be rapid.

Finally, what will moderate growth mean for the inflation outlook and
for monetary policy?
1.

As you know, keeping inflation low is the main way the Fed can
contribute to the economy’s long-term growth.
, pe setv© Bank
* * o f'Son Francisco

2.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




But the Fed also is concerned about the performance of the
economy in the short run.
SEP ^ ®

i

library

3.

II.

So finding the right balance between growth and inflation will be a
key consideration for monetary policy in 1993.

Let me start with the banking industry.
A.

In many parts of the country banks certainly have had some tough
sledding.
1.

B.

And we’re not out of the woods yet.
a.

We have close to a thousand institutions on the FDIC’s
problem list,

b.

and we haven’t seen the last of the bank failures.

But, commercial banks over the past year generally have posted strong
earnings and improved capitalization, despite a lackluster economy.
1.

In the first three quarters of last year, banks in the U.S. registered
a healthy 0.94 percent ROA, up sharply from a year earlier.

2.

The improvement in earnings has led to meaningful improvement
in bank capitalization.
a.

C.

D.

Why have banks’ earnings been strong?
1.

The main reason is the wider interest margins that are related in
part to the unusually steep yield curve.

2.

But it’s important to remember that we can’t depend on the steep
yield curve and favorable interest rate margins to persist.

3.

Moreover, we shouldn’t let them mask the fact that the underlying
vitality of our financial institutions depends on the vitality of the
economy itself.

Let me illustrate why the economy is important for banks’ profitability
by telling you about some research done at the San Francisco Fed.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




This is encouraging because strong capital positions are
fundamental to the long-run viability of banks.

2

1.

In that research, we compared the performance of community
banks in three major regions of California: Southern California,
the San Francisco Bay area, and the Central Valley.

2.

As you may know, the recession has hit Southern California
especially hard.
a.

3.

4.

E.

And these troubles are reflected in the performance of community
banks in the area.
a.

Despite favorable interest margins, in the first three
quarters of last year, the ROA for community banks in
Southern California was a dismal 0.06 percent (annual
rate).

b.

By comparison, earnings rates were seven to ten times
higher in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Central
Valley of California, where job losses have been less
severe.

In the same vein, in September, problem loan ratios were
appreciably higher for community banks in Southern California
than they were for their counterparts in the other regions of the
state.

The situation here in Utah also shows the link between the economy and
the health of banks.
1.

Throughout the national recession and sluggish recovery, Utah’s
economy has been relatively strong.

2.

That strength is reflected in a high ROA and high asset quality.
a.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




Of the more than 700,000 jobs that have been lost statewide
since the Spring of 1990, about 85 percent were in
Southern California.

For the first three quarters of 1992, banks in Utah
registered a very impressive ROA of 1.45 percent.

3

b.

III.

And problem real estate and consumer loan ratios for the
state are about half as large as for banks nationally.

F.

I think the performance of the Utah banks and the evidence on
community banks in California clearly suggest that the future financial
health of commercial banks rests to a large degree on the outlook for the
economy.

G.

Now, one of the issues in the outlook for the national economy is the
role that banks are playing.
1.

Some analysts argue that we’re seeing a slow recovery because of
sluggish lending by banks.

2.

But I think the far more dominant causal relationship runs the
other way—that banks are making fewer loans largely because of
the slow economy.

3.

That is, the weakness in the overall economy and problems in the
real estate sector explain a lot of the sluggishness in lending, not
just by banks but by virtually all lenders.

So now let me turn to the national economy.
A.

B.

Since growth in the economy began to slow in the spring of 1989, the
Fed has eased monetary policy substantially.
1.

The federal funds rate and other short-term rates are now about a
third of what they were in early 1989.

2.

And the discount rate now stands at 3 percent, its lowest level in
nearly three decades.

And though for some time it was hard to see the effects of this easing,
some of the most recent numbers have had a rosier glow.
1.

The unemployment statistics have improved,
a.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




falling from a high of 7.8 percent in June to 7.2 percent in
November.

4

2.

The third quarter growth rate of almost 3V2 percent in real GDP
brings growth for the first three quarters of 1992 to an average of
2 x/i percent.
a.

3.

Retail sales and consumer confidence improved markedly in
October and November.
a.

C.

IV.

And early reports suggest this improvement continued in
December.

Do statistics like these mean we’ve turned the corner? Is the recovery
finally taking hold?
1.

D.

This is a substantial improvement over 1991’s virtual
standstill.

I am more confident that the expansion will be sustained.

At the same time, I think we’ll see only a moderate expansion, probably
in the neighborhood of 3 percent both this year and next.

There are a number of reasons why modest growth is likely—weak economies
abroad, heavy imports, an overbuilt commercial real estate market, and fiscal
constraints. Let me take them one at a time.
A.

First, a number of our most important trading partners are going through
slowdowns themselves,
1.

B.

Second, we’ve been importing foreign goods, especially computers, at a
rapid pace in recent years, and we expect this trend to continue.
1.

C.

This cuts into demand for domestically produced goods and
services.

Then, there’s trouble in the commercial real estate market in many
places.
1.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\ 1-4-93.1




so their purchases of U.S. products aren’t growing as fast as in
earlier cyclical upturns.

The vacancy rate nationally is high, at about 20 percent.
5

2.
D.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, budget deficits have constrained
government spending at all levels.
1.

E.

V.

In particular, the large federal budget deficits and the end of the
cold war have made the government cut back, especially for
defense.

Each of these factors taken alone would have only a modest impact on
the economy as a whole.
1.

F.

And it will probably take years to work off this much overhang.

But taken together, they probably mean that growth will be around
3 percent for 1993, rather than the 4-5 percent that would be
normal early in an economic recovery.

Of course, this forecast could change once we know more about what to
expect from the Clinton White House.
1.

For example, one of the major items of discussion at the two-day
economic conference in Little Rock was an investment tax credit.

2.

But at this point it’s too soon to tell what kind of fiscal program
the new administration will propose.

Now, let me give you my outlook for inflation.
A.

During the past four years of recession and slow growth, labor and
product markets slackened, and this restrained growth in labor
compensation and product prices.

B.

And I think we’ll probably see continued downward pressure on inflation
for a couple of reasons.
1.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




First, as I mentioned, the economy is likely to pick up only
gradually, so this will keep inflationary pressures from building
up.

6

2.

Second, we’ve seen stronger increases in worker productivity over
the last four quarters.
a.

C.

VI.

So long as these continue, firms will have a better chance
of meeting increased demand without having to increase
prices.

During 1992, core consumer inflation—which excludes the volatile food
and energy component from the consumer price index—rose at around a
V h percent rate,

1.

and I expect to see it decline to about 2 3A percent this year and to
be lower in 1994.

2.

Compared to the 4'/2 percent core rate of consumer inflation in
1991, 2% percent in 1993 definitely would represent progress.

What does this mean for monetary policy?
A.

As I said at the outset, the Federal Reserve’s main long-term goal is to
keep inflation low and move gradually toward price stability.
1.

That is really the most important way the Fed can contribute to
long-run growth in the economy.

2.

So the downward trend in inflation that I expect is very much in
keeping with our long-term goal.

B.

Our progress in lowering inflation in recent years is important also
because it gives us greater latitude to respond to weakness in the
economy if it’s necessary.

C.

But I want to emphasize that while we’ll continue to do what we can to
help sustain economic recovery,
1.

P:\WP51\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




we also must be careful to preserve and advance hard-won gains
against inflation.

7

D.

I think our efforts in both areas ultimately will pay off.

wc 1617

P:\WPM\PARRY\SLC\l-4-93.1




8