View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Rf:J\1ARKS OF MR, RoBERT P. f16.yo
PRESIDENT FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CH ICAGO
To THE EcoNavtic STUDENT AssocIATION
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
f16.RCH 6, 1979
I

I AM PLEASED TO HAVE BEEN INVITED TO MEET WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN ECONOMIC STUDENT AsSOClATION,

IT ISILWAYS EXCITING TO BE WITH

STUDENTS, PARTICULARLY ECONOMICS STUDENTS, YourAVE MJRE THAN THE USUC\L
PUBLIC INTEREST IN ECONOMIC POLICY AND ARE LIKELY TO BE FULL OF QUESTIONS
--TOUGH BUT IMPORTANT QUESTIONS,

l FEEL VERY MUCH AT HOME WITH ECONOMISTS,

I WORKED AS AN ECOf'OMIST

AT THE WASHINGTON STATE TAX CorvvvlISSION IN THE LATE 3J's AND IN THE U,S,
TREASURY FOR

20 YEARS AS WELL.

AND NOW, OF COURSE,

I AM AN ECONCT-lIC

PRACTITIONER--AN ECONOMIC POLICYMAKER,
GIVEN MY BACKGROUND AND MY CURRENT POSITION,

l AM MINDFUL OF

GEORGE

STIGLER' S DlCTLM, "ECONOMISTS POSSESS 11-IEIR FULL SHARE OF COf'1VON ABILITY
TO INVENT AND CDr-'MIT ERRORS, PERHAPS 11-IEIR t'OST CWMJN ERROR IS TO BELIEVE
OTHER ECONOMISTS,"

rb-/, OF COURSE, I OON' T WANT YOU TO DISBELIEVE ME, So l AM GO ING TO
STAY AWAY FRQ\1 A RIGOROUS THEORETICAL fvODEL BUILDING EXERCISE WHICH WOULD
BE CERTAIN TO CONTAIN ERRORS, AFTER ALL, EVEN THE lOP THEORISTS RARELY CAN
GET AGREEMENT FROM A MA.JORITY OF THEIR COLLEAGUES,
A POLICYf\1AKER'S POSTURE AND TALK AS

MR,

INSTEAD, l WANT TO TAKE

GRAN SUGGESTED ABOUT THE ECONOMY'S

PROBLEMS AND THE ROLE FOR MONETARY POLICY IN THE CURRENT SITUC\TION, AND 1
WOULD LIKE TO

IX)

THIS PRir-¥.RILY FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AS A POLICY~AKER,

I HAVE BEEN AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO FOR 11,E PAST 81/2
YEARS,

I HAVE PARTICIPATED IN tv10RE THAN 100 MEETINGS OF THE FEDERAL OPEN

MARKET CottMITTEE--hHICH, AS YOU KNOW, IS THE PRlfY1ARY fv'ONETARY POLICYfV1AKING


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 2 -

GROUP IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, THAT IS A LARGE ENOUGH SAMPLE, l
THINK, TO BE ABLE TO DRAW SOfY1E RELIABLE CONCLUSIONS, THE MEETINGS ARE NOT
INDEPENDENT EVENTS, BUT AT TIMES EVEN l WONDER IF THE SAMPLE IS BEING DRAWN
FROM THE SAME UNIVERSE,
IN THE TIME I HAVE SPENT IN THE t'ONETARY POLICYfv1AKING ARENA, I HAVE
SEEN: THE DEMISE OF THE FREE RESERVES CONCEPT; THE RISE AND DEMISE OF RPD's
(RESERVES AGAINST PRIVATE DEPOSITS); THE RISE OF EMPHASIS ON THE fv'ONETARY
AGGREGATES; THE INTRODUCTION OF EXPLICIT TARGET PATHS FOR M-1, M-2 AND M--3;
THE INCREASING CONCERN ABOUT THE RELIABILITY OF OUR MJNETARY AGGREGATE
MEASURES AND WHAT NOW fvlAY BE A COMPLETION OF THE CIRCLE, SLGGESTIONS THAT
A BA.NK RESERVE MEASURE fvlAY BE THE BEST GUIDE FOR MONETARY ACTIONS,
THESE 1WISTS AND TURNS IN EMPHASIS HAVE FREQUENTLY BEEN INTERPRETED
BY THOSE OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM-ACADEMICS AND FED WATCHERS ALIKE--AS EXAMPLES
OF ELEGAl'IT SOLUTIONS BE ING FRUSTRATED BY SfUP ID POLI CYf'11\KERS,
THAT IS HARDLY THE CASE,

c.ACH CHANGE IN EMPHASIS HAS BEEN LED AND

ACCOMPANIED BY VOLLMINOUS INPUT FROM ECONOMISTS,
ALWAYS AGREE,
AGREE,

Bur ECONOMISTS IDN'T

IN FACT, IN THE POLICY ARENA ONE MIGHT SAY THAT THEY SELOOM

FURTHER, THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELEGANT SOLUTIONS ARE INFLUENCED BY

FEASIBILITY AND ACCEPTABILITY,

Is IT, FOR EXAMPLE, FEASIBLE TO ARGUE FOR A

RAPID DECELERATION IN THE RATE OF GROWTH IN THE t'ONETARY AGGREGATES IGt\lQRING THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SHARP, SHORT-RUN OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT DECLINES?
I THINK NOT, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE MOW THAT CoNGRESSIONAL STIMULATIVE ACTION
WILL INEVITABLY FOLLOW,

POLICYMI\KERS MUST CONDITION THEIR RESPONSES TO THE

REALITIES OF THE WORLD AROUND us--TO THE KNO'dN IMPEDIMENTS TO ADJUSTMEf\ff OF
OUR ECONOMY--TO THE LIKELY REACTIONS OF OTHERS,

Bur I AM GETTING AHEAD OF MY PLANNED APPROACH TODL\Y, I roN'T INTEND
TO Mil.KE A FORMAL REVIEW OF THE ISSUES RELATING TOlHE M:lNEY STOCK VERSUS


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 3 -

INTEREST RATES AS POLICY TARGETS, THE CHOICE AMONG ttONETARY AGGREGATES, THE
COST OF MISSING t--DNETARY TARGETS OR THE USE OF RESERVES, THE MJNETARY BASE
OR FED FUNDS AS OPERATING TARGETS, fibST OF YOU KNOW THE ARGUMENT,
EACH OF YOU MC\Y HAVE A POSITION,

INDEED,

RATHER, I WANT TO PROVIDE A LITTLE OF THE

SffiING IN WHICH RECENT MJNETARY POLICY DECISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE AND SOME
PERSPECTIVE FOR THE PERIOD AHEAD,
WE WILL VERY SOON--NEXT IVDNTH--BE ENTERING OUR FIFTH YEAR OF ECOf\OMIC
GROWTH SINCE THE RECESSION OF 1974. THIS EXPANSION OUTRANKS IN LONGEVITY
EVERY PRIOR CYCLICAL UPSWING OF THE POST-WAR ERA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THAT
IN THE 19fDs. lT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO SUSTAIN A CONTINUED PACE OF EXPANSION.
SLOtJER GROWTl-f IN HOUSING, PERSONAL CONSLMPTION EXPENDITURES AND BUSINESS
CAPITAL SPENDING--AND EVEN tDVERNMENT SPENDING--ALL APPEAR TO BE LIKELY AND
WJULD BE EXPECTED TO LEAD TO A SUBSTANTIAL IVDDERATION OF THE PACE OF ECONOt'1IC
EXPANSION AS THE YEAR PROGRESSES,

NEVERTHELESS, MY OWN VIEW IS THAT WE WILL

SEE POSITIVE, BUT NONETHELESS, SLOW GROWTI-i THIS YEAR,
COULD TIP US INTO THE NEGATIVE COLL.MN BUT

KECENT EVENTS IN IRAN

l AM ENCOURAGED BY RECENT EFFORTS

TO RESTORE IRANIAN OIL PRODUCTION EVEN THOUGH AT LESS THAN PRIOR PRODOCTION
LEVELS (AND AT INCREASED PRICES),
WE ENDED

1978 ON A VIGOROUS NOTE, EMPLOYMENT, OUTPUT, NEW ORDERS,

INCOME AND RETAIL SALES WERE ALL RISING SOLIDLY, SoME OBSERVERS ARE CONCERNED
THAT THE IVDRE THAN SIX AND A HALF PERCENT RATE OF REAL ECONavlIC GROWTH IN
THE FOURTH QIJC\RTER tv"AY BE SIGNALING THE START OF A BOOM-AND-BUST BUBBLE,
I DOUBT THAT THIS IS THE CASE,

l EXPECT TO SEE THE FIGURES COt'1ING THROUGH

IN A LESS VIGOROUS FASHION AS THE YEAR PROGRESSES,
rbUSING HAS STARTED TO FEEL THE IMPACT OF RESTRICTIVE MONETARY POLICY,
BUT IT IS THE ONLY SECTOR SO FAR SHOWING SIGNS OF WEAKNESS--AND EVEN THERE
WITH NO SIGNS OF A DECLINE ANYWHERE NEAR AS STEEP AS IN 1974, CoNSLMER


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 4 -

SPENDING, A MAJOR SOURCE OF STRENGTH THROUGI-OLJT THIS EXPANSION, IS LIKELY
TO TAPER OFF A LITTLE BIT, THE RISING BURDEN OF C0NSLMER DEBT HAS BEEN
FREQUENTLY CITED AS A LIKELY REASON FOR MJDERATION IN CONSLMER OLJTLAYS,
WHILE CERTAINLY A FACTOR, I OON'T SEE THIS ASLEADING TO ANY SHARP CLJTBACK IN PERSONAL SPENDING,
BUSINESS INVENTORIES HAVE BEEN MJDERATE, EVEN LOW, IN RELATION TO

As A RESULT OF CALJTIOUS

SALES,

INVENTORY POLICIES, THE REDUCTION OF IN-

VENTORIES ACCOMPANYING LOWER OVERALL GROWTH IS NOT LIKELY TO BE AS SERIOUS
AS IT WAS FIVE YEARS AGO

I

INDICATORS OF TI-IE PROBABLE PACE OF CAPITAL INVES1MENT ARE MIXED,

CUR-

RENTLY, ORDER BACKLOGS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT INDICATE A FURTHER RISE IN CAPITAL SPENDING, BUT BUSINESS INVES1MENT INTENTIONS
SURVEYS INDICATE A SLOWER GROWTH IN SPENDING,

HIGHER INTEREST RATES AND

EXPECTATIONS OF SLOWOOWN IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ARE LIKELY TO RESULT IN SOME
HOLDING BACK OF INVES1MENT PLANS,
PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES BY BOTH fEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS WILL BE RISING THIS YEAR BUT THE RISE SHOULD BE VERY M)DEST
IN REAL TERMS,

FURTHER, TI-IEY ARE NOT LIKELY TO OFFSET REDOCTIONS IN HOUSING

AND BUSINESS FIXED INVES1MENT,
OUR ECONO''iY REMA INS REMARKABLY WELL mLANCED, THERE ARE STILL NO
SIGNIFICANT EXCESSES AFTER AOOST FIVE YEARS OF EXPANSION, THAT'S AN
AMAZING RECORD,

IT ALSO STRIKES A VERY POSITIVE NOTE, SINCE ECON()vlIC BALAi'\JCE

REDUCES THE CHANCES FOR SHARP DECLINES IN ACTIVITY, BUT NEITHER OOES 11-JE
ECONOMY HAVE MUCH ROOM FOR RAPID EXPANSION, W: ARE OPERATING AT OR CLOSE TO
CAPACITY IN SUCH VITAL SECTORS AS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, STEEL, CEMENT,
OIL REFINING, AND VARIOUS TYPES OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, WE HAVE A LARGER
PERCENTAGE ·of OUR v-ORKING AGE POPULATION EMPL0YEDlODAY THAN AT ANY PREVIOUS


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 5 -

TIME IN OUR HISTORY, ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS y.,OLJLD ONLY EXACERBATE
INFLATION,
EVEN WITH SLOWER GROWTH IN THE ECONOMY THIS YEAR, I MUST CONFESS I
00 NOT EXPECT TO SEE ANY SWEEPING STRIDES IN WINDING OOWN INFLATION, THE
LIKELY SUCCESS OF THE PRESIDENT'S WAGE AND PRICE STANDARDS PROGRAM IS STILL
A QUESTION MARK,

I.ABOR CONTRACT BARGAINING IS SURE TO BE VIGOROUS THIS

YEAR, WITH CONTINUED RAPID ESCALATION OF FOOD PRICES, THE NEWLY EFFECTIVE
INCREASES IN MINIMLM WAGE AND SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES, THE UNFORTUNATE RISE
IN OPEC OIL PRICES, AND THE CONTINUED PASS-THROUGH OF HIGHER PRICES FOR
IMPORTS, THE CHANCES OF ANY SIGNIFICANT r1JDERATION IN PRICE RISES IS SMALL.
CLEARLY, THE CENTRAL ISSUE IS TO AVOID STRONG AGGREGATE DEMAND PRESSURES THAT WOULD AGGRAVATE OUR ALREADY SERIOUS INFLATION PROBLEM, BUT AT
THE SAfviE TIME WE MUST HOLD IN PLACE SUFFICIENT FISCAL AND r1JNETARY POLICY
RESTRAINT TO RELIEVE INFLATIONARY PRESSURES OVER THE LONG PULL WI11-IOUT
TRIGGERING A RECESSION,
LiNIDUBTEDLY, ONLY MODEST IMPROVEMENT IN REDUCING THE RATE OF INFLATION
ALONG WITH SLOWER ECONOMIC GROWTH CAN WEAKEN THE RESOLVE OF CoNGRESS TO
FIGHT INFLATION, AND IF r1JDEST IMPROVEMENT IS ACCOMPANIED BY SIGNIFICANT
DECLINES IN OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT THE RESOLVE OF CONGRESS 't-OULD PROBABLY BE
DESTROYED,

As

0-iAIRM!\N MILLER HAS INDICATED IN HIS RECENT REPORT TO CoNGRESS, THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM BELIEVES THAT WE CAN vlALK THAT NARROW LINE,

IF

FISCAL POLICY MAINTAINS THE STANCE OUTLINED IN THE PRESIDENT'S BUDGET
MESSAGE, THERE IS A PATH WHICH f/ONETARY POLICY CAN TAKE THAT HAS A REASONABLE
CHANCE OF ACHIEVING OUR GOAL OF fv"ODERATING PRICE PRESSURES WITHOUT TRIGGERING A RECESSION,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 6 To TH/ff END, THE FEDERAL OPEN f'llc..RKET CottMITTEE HAS SELECTED GROWTH
RANGES FOR THE M)NETARY AGGREGATES WAT IT BELIEVES WILL BRING AN APPROPRIATE
DEGREE OF RESTRAINT IN LIGHT OF THE CURRENT OUTLOOK FOR FISCAL POLICY AND
THE lJ'JDERLYING STRENGTH OF PRIVATE DEMAND IN THE ECONOMY,

0vER THE YEAR

ENDING WITH THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1979, M-1 IS EXPECTED TO GROW BE1WEEN
11/2 AND

4 ]/2

PERCENT AND M-2,

5 TO 8 PERCENT,

IHAT GROWTH RATE FOR M-1 IMPLIES A MARKED DECELERATION FR0'-1 THE PACE
OF RECENT YEARS--7,9 PERCENT IN 1977 AND 7,3 PERCENT IN

1978, Bur

LEST

YOU GET ~RRIED ABOUT TOO RAPID A DECELERATION, LET ME REMIND YOU lHAl PART
OF THE LOWERING OF THE RANGE REFLECTS AN EXPECTATION THAT THE SHIFTING OF
FUNDS TO SAVINGS ACCOUNTS WITH AUTQ\1ATIC BANK TRANSFER FACILITIES AND THE
RECENTLY AUTHORIZED

f\DW

ACCOUNTS IN

NEW

YORK STATE WILL CONTINUE TO DEPRESS

THE GROrffif OF DEMAND DEPOSITS THROUGHOUT 1979,
GROWTH THIS YEAR BY AS MUCH AS

3 PERCENTAGE

THAT SHIFT COULD DAMPEN M-1

POINTS,

rbWEVER, WE HAVE ONLY

HAD A BRIEF EXPERIENCE ON WHICH TO BASE THIS PROJECTION AND, THEREFORE, THERE
IS A BROAD RANGE OF UNCERTAINTY,

Au_ OF YOU ARE AWARE,
MJNTHS,

l

ASSUME, THAT

IN FACT, THE LEVEL OF

M-1

M-1

HAS BEEN FLAT IN RECENT

FOR PUBLISHED FEBRUARY DATA IS BELOW THAT

FOR SEPTEMBER,
FRANKLY, WE HAVE HAD DIFFICULTY IN EXPLAINING THIS FLATNESS EVEN IN
THE LIGHT OF THE ATS AND

NOW

As A RESULT, THE
F0'1C DELIBERATIONS,

ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENTS,

PERFORi'v\t\NCE HAS ADDED AN OBVIOUS UNCERTAINTY"[)

M-1
IT IS

IMPOSSIBLE TO TELL \A/HETHER THE WEAKNESS OF M-1 RELATIVE TO \A/HAT WOULD HAVE
BEEN EXPECTED ON THE BASIS OF HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIPS AMJNG t'ONEY, INCOME
AND INTEREST RATES IS A TRANSITORY PHENOMENON OR ONE THAT IS LIKELY TO PERSIST FOR SQ"'E TIME,

IF THE RECENT WEAKNESS OOES REFLECT A CHANGE IN THE

PUBLIC'S ALLOCATION OF FUNDS AfvDNG VARIOUS FINANCIAL ASSETS THAT WILL PERSIST


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 7FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME, THEN THE CORRECT POLICY RESPONSE v/OULD BE t\lQT TO
REACT BY REDt.X:ING RESTRAINT ON THE ECOf'.K.)MY,

!F, HOWEVER, IT IS TEMPORARY,

ONLY ONE OF THESE FREQUENT FLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBERS, THEN THE CORRECT
RESPONSE WOULD BE TO EASE RESTRAINT,
THUS, INTERPRETATION OF THE Nl.JviBERS IS CRITICAL FOR POLICY. BUT YET

M-1 SEEMS TO BE A SavlEWHAT AMBIGLOUS INDICATOR OF POLICY. THUS, IT BECOMES
ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO M)NITOR CAREFULLY THE BEHAVIOR OF OTHER FINANCIAL
VARIABLES,
THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS TRYING TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM OF MEASUREMENT
OF THE AGGREGATES,

PROPOSALS FOR REDEFINITION OF THE M)NETARY AGGREGATES

ARE LNDER. STUDY, JlttoNG THE PROPOSALS MADE IN A STAFF PAPER PUBLISHED FOR
PUBLIC C~NT IN THE JANUARY fE.DERAL RESERVE BUU.ETIN IS THAT M-1 BE REDEFINED TO ENCOMPASS ATS, f'OW AND OTHER SIMILAR TRANSACTION ACCOUNTS,

SUCH

A REDEFINITION WON'T ELIMINATE THE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE BEHAVIOR OF VARIOUS
FINANCIAL ASSETS, BUT IT MIGHT PRODt.X:E AN AGGREGATE fv'ORE REFLECTIVE OF THE
PUBLIC'S NEED FOR TRANSACTION BALANCES IN LIGHT OF ONGOING INSTITUTIONAL
CHANGES,

f+1 IS NOT THE ONLY PUZZLING AGGREGATE, THERE ARE QUESTIONS AS VIELL
REGARDING THE l"OVEMENTS OF THE INTEREST-BEARING COMPONENTS OF THE BROADER
AGGREGATES-ESPECIALLY THE TIME AND SAVINGS DEPOSITS AT COVMERCIAL BANKS
IN M-2, BANK SAVINGS DEPOSITS HAVE DECLINED APPRECIABLY IN THE PAST FEW
t'ON11-lS, DESPITE AN INFLOW TO ATS ACCOUNTS, SAVINGS DEPOSITS MIGHT BE EXPECTED TO BE WEAK WHEN MARKET RATES ARE HIGH, BUT A LARGE GAP HAS EXISTED
FOR SOME TIME SO YOU WOULD HAVE EXPECTED f"'OST OF THE INTEREST SENSITIVE
FUNDS TO HAVE ALREADY SHIFTED,

PERHAPS WITH RECENT HIGH NOMINAL INTEREST

RATES, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN fVDRE AGGRESSIVE IN SEEKING OUT MARKET YIELDS,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 8THESE DIFFICULTIES Sf-OULD NOT BE TAKEN TO IMPLY THAT rtONETARY POLICY
HAS NO BASIS FOR MAKING A DEClSION OR THAT THE MONETARY AGGREGATES SI-OULD
BE DISCARDED, THE LATTER hOULD BE EQUIVALENT TO THE OLD LINE ABOUT THROWING
THE BA.BY OUT ~~ITH THE BATH WATER,

lT OOES, HOWEVER, SUGGEST THE NECESSITY

OF SOMETHING OTHER THAN A PURELY MECHANISTIC RESPONSE FUNCTION TO t'ONETARY
AGGREGATE DEVELOPMENTS, Ch-HER FINANCIAL VARIABLES MUST ALSO BE SEARCHED
FOR CLUES AND SO MUST DEVELOPMENTS IN TI,E REAL ECONQ\1Y,
fiL.L OF US ON TI,E ConvlITTEE KNOW THAT r1:lNETARY POLICY ACTIONS AFFECT
11,E ECOl'OMY WITH A LAG, WHAT IS HAPPENING TODAY IS NOT TI,E RESULT OF TODAY'S
ACTIONS--OR.LAST WEEK'S, OR LAST r1:lNTH 1 S,

IF WE WAIT UNTIL WE SEE THE

UNDESIRED EVENTS OCCURRING IN TI,E ECONOMY, IT WILL BE TOO LATE, BUT EVEN
SO, TRENDS IN TI,E REAL ECOt-OMY, WHETI,ER IN ORDERS, INVENTORIES, CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OR OTHER SIGNS OF PLANS FOR THE FUTURE GIVE US SOME FEELING ON
THE POSITION WE ARE IN, AND SO 00 RELATED FINANCIAL AND CREDIT MARKET
DEVELOPMENTS,
THE POLICY DECISION TO BE MADE CURRENTLY IS NOT AN ISSUE OF r-DNETARIST
VERSUS NON-r-DNETARIST APPROACHES TO MONETARY POLICY, BoTH HAVE A GREAT DEAL
OF UNCERTAINTY AT THE MJv!ENT, BoTH ARE KEENLY AWARE THAT ONE OF THE MAJOR
l"ONETARY POLICY FAULTS IN THE PAST HAS BEEN TO HOLD TO A POSITION OF RESTRAINT
TOO LONG,

Bur BOTH ARE ALSO CONCERNED AS WELL ABOUT THE INFLATIONARY PRES-

SURES IN THE SOCIETY AND BOTI-1 RECOGNIZE THE CRITICAL ROLE OF rv'DNETARY POLICY,
IN HIS INVITATION TO ME, MR, GRAN SAID "As YOU KNOW, OUR ECONOMY IS
IN A PRECARIOUS SITUi\TION, 11 IT lS. IN TERMS OF UNCERTAINTY, BlIT NOT IN TERMS
OF ITS DEPENDENCE ON CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND OUR CONTROL,

IN SPITE OF THE

CURRENT DIFFICULTIES, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THIS YEAR WILL USHER IN A
NEW ATTITUDE ABOlIT ECONav!IC POLICY--A NEW POSTURE BASED ON LONGER TERM SOLUTIONS TO OUR ECONOMIC PROBLEMS RATHER THAN "QUICK FIXES" THAT CAN'T AND
OON'T \~ORK,

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

- 9 -

THERE IS A SURPRISING PERVASIVENESS OF AN ATTITUDE OF ACCEPTANCE OF A
REDUCED PACE OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY,

WE MAY NOT BE SO QUICK TO REVERSE

FEDERAL POLICY GEARS, f1A.YBE WE WILL BE r,'ORE WILLING AS A NATION TO ACCEPT
A SOMEWHAT SLOWER SPEED FOR THE ENGINE,

CERTAINLY WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN THE

EC01'nMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT, WE HAVE SEEN IT TOO IN THE FACT OF LESS
--QR NONEXISTE~IT--PRESSURE TO REVERSE fv'ONETARY POLICY PREMATURELY,

l AM HOPEFUL THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO MODERATE r,'ONETARY POLICY RESTRAINT
AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME THIS TIME AROUND 11-IE CYCLE, AND

I AM HOPEFll. WE

WILL BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN A REASONABLE FISCAL AND fvONETARY POLICY POSTURE
IN ORDER TO MAKE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS TOWARD A MORE STABLE LESS INFLATIONARY
ECOf'OMY,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis