View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR THE UNITED STATES AND THE SOUTHEAST
Remarks by Robert P. Forrestal
President and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Meninak Club
Jacksonville, Florida
June 19, 1995

It is a pleasure to be here to speak with you today. Since I have spoken to your club
before, I do not know if I owe this return visit more to Bill Nash or to one of your directors who
is also the program chairman, Bernie Carter. Be that as it may, I hope to give you some insights
into the outlook for the national economy and our regional economy. I will try to keep my
remarks somewhat on the brief side in order to allow as much time as possible for questions.

Before beginning, if I may take a moment to say just a few words about Bernie Carter,
who is going to take early retirement this year from the Jacksonville Branch of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta:

I am aware that those of you who belong to the Meninak Club believe strongly in the
credo that "service to youth is insurance for the preservation of democracy. ” Last year, Bernie
gave nearly 80 speeches about the role of the Federal Reserve and over the years, he has spoken
to thousands of college students, high school students, and grammar school children in the
Jacksonville area. It strikes me that the children of Jacksonville may be the best informed in the
nation about how the central bank works, all thanks to this singular man. Let me wish you the
best in your retirement, Bernie, and also thank you for the tireless effort you have put forth on
behalf of the Jacksonville Branch and the Meninak Club in serving the young people of this area.




2
The U.S. Economy
Now let me turn first to the U.S. economy: Growth in output last year was 4 percent, and
this year also looks like another good year, but with a more moderate growth rate of about 3
percent on an annual average basis. Considering that the expansion has been going on for four
years,a slower rate of growth this year is absolutely appropriate and necessary. In fact, we
welcome this development since we would like to ensure that current pressures on prices will
prove to be a temporary and cyclical phenomenon. With growth decelerating, it is unlikely that
the unemployment rate will decline much further. My best guess is that it will be close to 5-1/2
percent, but it could run above this level at times. Inflation may rise to somewhat above 3
percent, since price pressures tend to increase as the economy operates at capacity over time.

As has been true the past few years, the main areas of strengths and weaknesses in the
U.S. economy will not change much in 1995. Certain components of gross domestic product that
have been growing strongly through 1994, such as personal consumption, capital spending, and
construction, will still be growing—but at a slower rate. Healthy demand for automobiles and
other durable consumer goods accounted for much of the acceleration in personal consumption
last year. Sales of automobiles and other durables will be good again in 1995, but they will be
distinctly slower than last year. That deceleration is the result of increases in interest rates and
the fact that pent-up demand has largely been met. Consumption of nondurable goods like
clothing will continue to grow, but not enough to offset the expected slowing in demand for
consumer durables to a pace that is more sustainable.




3
The same theme holds true in the area of investment by businesses in productive capital,
such as plant and equipment. Capital spending has been growing in the double-digit range for two
years now. Although this investment will be decelerating, it is a retreat from a very high pace.
I would like to add that this aspect of growth is quite significant. That is because it expands the
capacity of the economy, a matter which is quite vital at this time when we seem to be very near
our capacity—whether measured in terms of the unemployment rate or factory use. This rapid
addition to productive capacity helps to temper price pressures from strong demand.

Another type of investment spending, construction of single-family homes, has contributed
strongly to economic growth in the United States over the past few years. This boom in building
activity has now peaked. Although multifamily and commercial construction should be increasing
in 1995, these anticipated increases will not offset the decline in single-family construction.

Government spending is likely to be flat after shrinking somewhat last year. Ongoing
pressure to reduce the federal budget deficit should help to keep government spending down. Of
course, it is hard enough to make economic forecasts. I am certainly not going to attempt a U.S.
political forecast, especially this year. Still, any changes that the new Congress might enact are
not likely to affect economic activity directly in 1995, although they could indirectly affect
expectations as reflected in financial markets. Let me emphasize also that, although government
spending will not add to GDP, any progress toward reducing the deficit will be good for the
long-term prospects for economic growth.




4
In the area of foreign trade, a number of issues should affect U.S. exports and imports.
With U.S. economic growth decelerating, demand from domestic sectors for all goods-imported
goods as well as those produced in the United States—should slow. Many European economies
are on a moderate growth path now, while the dollar is lower than it was last year at this time.
These circumstances should help our net export position.

On the negative side, the Mexican peso depreciated considerably in the early part of 1995.
The currencies of some other Latin American countries have also been under pressure at times.
This development, along with more restrictive economic policies in that country and possibly
others in Latin America, will probably restrain demand for U.S. exports from those areas.
However, I should point out that although this situation will have a negative effect on trade, it
should not be a huge negative effect because exports to Latin America are a relatively small part
of U.S. trade. In broader terms, I can say that the gap between exports and imports should not
get much bigger during this year and may actually begin to narrow toward the end of the year.

Summing up the outlook for the United States this year: GDP should grow by about 3
percent, with inflation rising to somewhat above 3 percent, and unemployment averaging about
5-1/2 percent. Overall, then, the national economy should be healthy, although it is true that
some areas will not be growing as quickly as before.

Regional Economic Outlook
Now let me move on to the regional economy and go into a bit more detail for the




5

Southeast. Its recent economic performance during and after the recession has been nothing short
of spectacular. After three years of leading the nation in job growth, the region will see a
leveling off of employment creation through the rest of 1995. However, this development is
nothing to be alarmed about because the Southeast should still enjoy healthy job growth this year.
Gains in southeastern employment have slowed from a peak of 3-1/2 percent in 1993 to around
3 percent annually last year. Payroll expansion may continue to decelerate modestly to a rate of
about 2-1/2 percent to 3 percent during this year. Although the nation had been lagging behind
the Southeast, it has now almost caught up.

Since the recession, the Southeast has shown strength because it is home to a
concentration of industries that grow quickly when the national economy emerges from recession.
One of these areas is durable goods purchased by consumers. Building-related industries, such
as wood products, furniture, and appliances as well as textiles used for carpets, draperies, and
the like, have benefited from the growth in residential construction, both in the Southeast and
across the nation.

Although construction and manufacturing of consumer durables helped the Southeast to
outpace the country early in the recovery, it is still wise to remember the cyclical nature of these
major industries. Fortunately, the Southeast can depend on a strong underlying, or long-term,
growth trend thanks to some demographic factors, such as the continued in-migration of people
and businesses from other regions of the country, as well as a diversified economy and dynamic
industries, including the service sector. Health care, business services (such as temporary




6
agencies), and tourism account for the bulk of these new service jobs. Employment in these
services stopped accelerating in 1994 but has maintained a strong growth rate of about 6 percent.
These service jobs should continue to grow at a faster rate than manufacturing in 1995.

The two states in the Southeast that have the brightest outlook this year are Florida and
Georgia. Florida has created the second highest number of jobs in the nation since the recession.
(Texas is first, Florida second, and Georgia third in the nation.) Payroll employment continues
to grow at 4 percent annually, a rate that tracks the rest of the Southeast. Although tourism took
a hit in 1994, following several years of economic weakness abroad, it has begun to recover this
year. Construction will also remain healthy, with strong commercial activity. In addition,
continued in-migration of people from other states is propelling residential development, which
will contribute to overall growth in construction.

As for Jacksonville, your service economy is booming at a rate of 8 percent (year over
year). This compares with about a 5 percent rate for the state as a whole. This area is
experiencing a good deal of corporate relocations on a par with Orlando. Employment growth
is not as strong as the rest of the state or region, but to give you some perspective, your
employment growth is better than the state of Alabama.

In Georgia, the upcoming Centennial Olympic Games, which will be held in Atlanta next
summer, are spurring a great deal of construction, ranging from housing for athletes to the
Olympic stadium—not to mention the ancillary construction for retail, vendors, and tourism that




7
will expand because of the Games. Although this construction is an obvious sign of economic
growth, it will account directly for only a small portion of the overall growth in the state.

The other states in our region should continue to expand moderately although not at the
pace that Florida and Georgia will. In Alabama, the apparel industry continues to downsize, but
construction related to the Mercedes plant is beginning to spur stronger job growth in the
northern portion of the state. Tennessee, which has become the center of the new southern auto
industry, should find that auto parts and components-related production will continue to push the
state forward. However, Tennessee is experiencing labor shortages, partially because it has
traditionally not attracted the kind of in-migration Florida does. The economy in Mississippi is
slowing from a spurt of growth that is attributable to gambling-related industries, although overall
levels of income and employment remain high. Finally, in Louisiana payroll employment growth
remains strong at nearly 2 percent for the first quarter.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the U.S. economy is slowing to a sustainable rate of growth, and that is
exactly what is necessary to keep inflation in check. The Southeast has done particularly well
following the recession and has a good future thanks to its diversified economy and the
continuing in-migration of people and businesses. Although some of the short-term economic
news may be negative, I believe that in the long run, the data will prove that the Federal Reserve
has taken the correct steps to put the national economy on the path toward moderate and yet
sustainable growth.