View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

HON. ROBERT L. OWEN
OF O K LA H O M A

IN TH E

SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

M A R C H 9, 1920

W A S H IN G T O N
G O V E R N M E N T P R IN T IN G O F F IC E
1920

'l(594 3r»- 20r.91







SPEECH
OF

I I O N . R O B E R T L. O W E N .
Mr. OWEN. Mr. President, I am in favor o f passing the
treaty immediately and am quite ready to support the resolu­
tion of ratification either with “ interpretative reservations,”
agreeable to President Wilson, or *he “ Hitchcock reservations,”
or the “ Lodge reservations.” The differences are not suf­
ficiently important to justify delay in declaring peace.
The country, with just cause, overwhelmingly demands it,
and is incensed with all those who delay it.
The treaty of peace should pass at once because—
1. Our laws should be on a legal peace basis— not on a war
basis. T he’reduction of the high cost of living demands it. The
social unrest in our country demands it.
2. All rules and regulations based on war and all war boards
and commissions should be revoked. With peace comes auto­
matic repeal of war measures.
3. Our relations with enemy nations are definitely fixed by
the treaty determining our rights ac a Nation and as citizens.
Billions of dollars are involved, including all alien property,
Americans’ properties in alien enemy countries, all war damages,
and our trade, social, and political relations.
. 4. The ratification will stabilize Europe and the reconstruc­
tion of the nations. It will enable them to pay us, and thus
lower our taxes and lower our high cost of living thereby.
5. The more rapid restoration of Europe’s productive activi­
ties means their self-support, larger exports to us, greater sup­
plies for Europe and for us.
G. It will cause the rise in value o f European currency and
•international exchange, and restore many impaired fortunes.
7. It will strengthen the prestige and standing of the United
States, and improve our political, social, and trade relations
with all other nations.
8. It will help to end the starvation, social unrest, and growth
of radical socialism and bolshevism in Europe.
The covenant of the League o f Nations ought to pass, because—
(a) It provides for a mechanism to settle all international
disputes, (1) by diplomacy, (2) by conciliation, (3) by arbitra­
tion, (4) by a court o f international justice, (5) by the council,
(6) by the assembly, (7) by delay, (8) by agreeing to respect
the territorial integrity and existing political independence o f
member nations, and (9) to preserve it, (10) by boycott, (11)
by blockade, and, if necessary, (12) by military and naval force.
(b ) (14) It provides for gradual disarmament on land and sea,
to abate the high taxes of preparation for war. (15) It ends
conscription and (16) abates private munition making. (17)
2

169435— 20591

3
It ends secret treaties and (18) gives publicity to all war prep­
arations. (19) It provides a world forum where subject peoples
can bring their grievances. (20) It establishes a world assembly
where all nations may meet in conference and develop the princi­
ples which will promote the peace and happiness of mankind.
(21) It ends military autocracies and establishes for all time
the rule of civilized democracies. It ushers in a new great era
where the diligence, providence, and creative genius of mankind
can fully function under the blessings of peace and liberty.
REASONS

FOR

D E F E A T IN G

TREATY

NOT

J U S T IF IE D .

After 12 months of discussion the only irreconcilable dif­
ference remaining unadjusted between the President, Senator
H itc h c o c k , and Senator L odge appears to be over article 10,
which provides:
“ The high contracting parties undertake to respect and pre­
serve as against external aggression the territorial integrity
and existing political independence of all States members of
the League.
“ In case of any such aggression, or in case of any threat or
danger of such aggression, the executive council shall advise
upon the means by which the obligation shall be fulfilled.'’
President Wilson, Senator H it c h c o c k , and Senator L odge are
in accord on the United States undertaking “ to respect ” the
territorial integrity and existing political independence of mem­
ber Nations, but differ on the United States undertaking “ to
preserve ” the territorial integrity, and so forth.
All three agree that the United States undertake “ to respect,”
the territorial integrity, and so forth. President Wilson insists
that the United States also undertake “ to preserve ” the terri­
torial integrity, and so forth, subject to interpretative reserva­
tions.
Senator H itch cock agrees that the United States undei'take
“ to preserve,” but not to use military or naval forces or the
economic boycott “ to preserve ” unless Congress authorizes.
Senator L odge refuses to agree that the United States under­
take “ to preserve ” by any means whatever, unless Congress
authorizes in each particular instance.
All the world agrees “ to respect and preserve,” President
Wilson and Senator H itch cock agree “ to respect and pre­
serve,” Senator L odge “ to respect ” but not “ to preserve ” un­
less Congress authorizes in each particular instance.
It is my opinion that with the overthrow o f all the military
dynasties and the world-wide establishment o f democracies, and
the League of Nations with its covenanted safeguards, the
world’s peace is assured even if the United States remains out.
But to keep the United States out of the league be­
cause of the very small differences between the President
and Senator L odge would be defeating a very great end for a
very small end. They agree on 99 per cent of the German
treaty and are liable to destroy it over a 1 per cent difference.
To keep the United States out o f the moral leadership of man­
kind would be a great wrong. To defeat the treaty would be a
national calamity and would discredit the United States
throughout the world.
If the President’s view prevailed on article-10 no declaration
of war or voting of war supplies could be possible without con-




1G 9435— 20591




g r e ssio n a l

a c tio n ,

and

C on gress

w o u ld

do

w hat

w as

m o r a lly

r ig h t w ith o u t th e s u p p o s e d m o r a l c o e r c io n o f a r t ic le 1 0 “ to p r e ­
s e r v e ,” a n d s o f o r t h , a s C o n g r e s s d i d in t h e c a s e o f C u b a a n d
in t h e l a s t G r e a t W a r .

Ji S e n a t o r L odge ’ s v i e w p r e v a i l e d t h e s a m e r e s u l t s w o u l d
f o l l o w w i t h o u t t h e m o r a l in f l u e n c e o f t h e s p e c if ic o b l i g a t i o n o f
ai t i d e 1 0 .
1 h e m o r a l o b lig a t io n w o u ld e x i s t a n y w a y to r e s tr a in
an in te r n a t io n a l o u tla w fr o m in v a d in g
u p s e ttin g th e p e a c e o f th e w o rld .

p e a c e fu l

te r r ito r y

and

I a g r e e w i t h P r e s i d e n t W i l s o n in b e l i e v i n g t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s
s h o u ld e n te r on e q u a l t e r m s a n d w ith e q u a l m u t u a l o b lig a t io n s
w ith o th e r n a t io n s a n d n o t a p p e a r to d is t r u s t th e m o r s e e m to
s e e k t h e b e n e fi t s o f t h e t r e a t y w i t h o u t b e i n g w i l l i n g t o m e e t o u r
e q u a l s h a r e o f its b u r d e n s .
I p r e f e r a r t i c l e 1 0 a s i t is , b u t I
a m p re p a r e d , fo r th e s a k e o f p a s s in g th e t r e a ty a n d g e ttin g th e
a d v a n t a g e s o f it , t o y i e l d t o t h e d e m a n d o f a m a j o r i t y o f m y
c o l l e a g u e s in t h e S e n a t e .
The
S e n a t e a r e e n title d to r e sp e c t.

v ie w s

of

th e

m a jo r ity

of

th e

T h e c o u n t r y u n h a p p ily b e lie v e s th e d iffe r e n c e s a r e n o t r e c o n ­
c ile d b e c a u s e o f p e r s o n a l a n d p a r t i s a n p r i d e .
I r e fu s e to b e a p a r t y to th e d e f e a t o f th e
d e la y .
I a m r e a d y t o s u p p o r t it in a n y f o r m

t r e a t y o r to its
a n d fo llo w a n y

le a d e r w h o le a d s to it s r a t ific a t io n , a n d I w ill n o t f o llo w
l e a d e r w h o is l e a d i n g t o i t s d e f e a t o r d e l a y .

any

M r . P r e s id e n t, th e r e m a r k s w h ic h I h a v e j u s t d e liv e r e d w e r e
" 1 it t e n o n M a r c h 7 , b e f o r e I w a s f u r n i s h e d w i t h a m i m e o g r a p h e d
c o p y o f t h e P r e s i d e n t ’s l e t t e r t o S e n a t o r H i t c h c o c k o f M a r c h 8
a n d a r e s u b je c t, th e r e fo r e , to th a t u n d e r s ta n d in g w h e r e I seem
to h a v e m i s a p p r e h e n d e d t h e P r e s i d e n t ’ s p o s i t io n
It

appears now

to b e th e

w is h

D e m o c r a tic a s s o c ia te s v o te w ith

o f th e P re sid e n t

to

h a v e h is

th e ir r e c o n c ila b le o p p o n e n ts o f

P ie t r e a t y , d e f e a t t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f r a t i f i c a t i o n , a n d m a k e
t r e a t y w i t h o u t r e s e r v a t i o n s ” t h e i s s u e o f t h e n e x t e le c t i o n .

th e

r 1 sllo u l(1 r e g a r d t h i s a s a g r e a t i n j u r y t o o u r d o m e s t i c i n t e r e s t s ,
i h e d e l a y in e s t a b l i s h i n g p e a c e h a s h e lp e d t o r a i s e i n s t e a d o f
h e l p i n g t o lo w e r t h e c o s t o f l i v i n g .
T h e d e fe a t o f th e tr e a ty
w o u ld in ju r e A m e r ic a n p r e s tig e a b r o a d .
M i t h t h e t r e a t y , “ w i t h o r w i t h o u t r e s e r v a t i o n s ,” a s t h e c a m ­
p a ig n is s u e , th e d is c u s s io n o f o u r v it a l d o m e s tic p r o b le m s o f r e ­
c o n s tr u c tio n — th e c o s t o f liv in g , m o n o p o lie s a n d p r o fite e r in g , a n d
s o f o r t h — w i l l b e o b s c u r e d a s b e h i n d a s m o k e s c r e e n t o t h e b e n e fit
o f t h o s e s e lf is h i n t e r e s t s
v a n t a g e o f o u r p e o p le .

w h ic h

have

been

ta k in g

u n ju s t
J

ad­

I t w i l l b e i m p o s s i b l e a t t h e n e x t e le c t io n t o e l e c t a S e n a t e
f a v o r a b le to th e t r e a t y w it h o u t r e s e r v a t io n s , a n d e v e r y w e llin fo r m e d p u b lic m a n k n o w s it , so t h a t a f t e r th e c a m p a ig n th e
t r e a t y w i l l b e in n o b e t t e r p o s i t i o n r e l a t i v e l y t h a n it is n o w , a n d
w ith th e “ tr e a t y w it h o u t r e s e r v a t i o n s ” a s th e is s u e th e D e m o ­
c r a t ic P a r t y w o u ld h a v e a r u in o u s h a n d ic a p .
A s fa r as I am

concerned, a s an

A m e r ic a n

S en a to r, w h o fo r

v e r y m a n y y e a r s h a v e a r d e n tly a n d s tr e n u o u s ly se rv e d m y p a r ty
a n d m y c o u n t r y a n d s u p p o r te d th e a d m in is t r a t io n on a ll s u ita b le
o c c a s io n s , I d e c lin e to a s s u m e th e s lig h t e s t r e s p o n s ib ility fo r th e
d e la y o r th e d e fe a t o f th e tr e a ty .
1(50435— 2 0 5 9 1