View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY




Statement by

Philip E. Coldwell

Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

before the

Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs

United States Senate

February 8, 1978

Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to present a review of the
expenditures of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors
for 1977 and the budgets of the System for 1978.

As you may recall

from our testimony last April, I discussed the programs and progress
of the System in improving productivity, cost effectiveness, and the
quality of Federal Reserve services.
better

results

than

expected

These programs yielded even

during

1977,

and

our

projections

suggest that further improvements should be forthcoming in 1978.

1977 Results
Let

me

begin

today

by

reviewing

operating results of the System during 1977.

the

financial

and

The approved operating

budgets for 1977 totaled $704.8 million for the Federal Reserve
Banks, but estimated expenses are $685.4 million, an increase of only
4.1 percent over 1976 operating expenses.

This modest growth in

expenses at the Reserve Banks was achieved despite an expansion in
the volume of our operations of more than 7 percent and increases in
resource costs also in the 7 percent range.
The 1977 operating budget of $43.9 million for the Board of
Governors compared with estimated expenses of $'43.8 million.

This

represented 6 percent of total System operating expenses.
Both the Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors achieved
significant

savings

in

operations

resulting

accelerated programs to achieve cost reductions.




primarily

from

Estimated budget

2

-

-

savings at the Banks totaled $19.4 million, or 2.8 percent below the
approved budget, and the Board's underrun was $92 thousand, or 0.2
percent below its approved budget.
Reserve Bank employment dropped below the 25,000 level for
the first time since 1973.

Estimated employment for 1977 is 24,493,

a decrease of almost 800 employees from 1976 and more than 2,000
employees since 1974.
Employment

at

the

Board

as

measured

by

authorized

positions has remained relatively steady for the past two years and
for 1977 amounted to 1,587.

Continued increases in requirements in

the regulation areas of bank supervision and consumer affairs and
sunshine

legislation

employment

through

have

been

improvements

absorbed
in

with

little

productivity

change

in

and

careful

System

expenses

reallocation of resources.
Major

developments

in 1977

affecting

included a new program for consumer compliance examinations, educa­
tional

programs

to

familiarize

bankers

with

consumer

laws

and

regulations, an expanded bank holding company inspection program and
a new reporting format, volume increases in the operating areas of
the Reserve Banks, and inflationary cost increases for the purchase
of resources.
In April 1977 the System adopted a new program providing
for special consumer affairs examinations of State member banks and a
broad educational program for all member banks.




The Board has

- 3 -

provided specialized training to groups of examiners from all of the
Reserve Banks, placing emphasis on examination procedures, and has
also

provided

training programs

to Reserve Bank

staff covering

techniques for familiarizing commercial bank staff with consumer
regulations.
Regarding the impact of volume increases on Reserve Bank
operations, we estimate that i.i 1977 the volume of measurable Federal
Reserve

output

increased by approximately 7 percent,

while the

aggregate unit cost of operations decreased by more than 2 percent.
These

estimates

are based

upon

operations

in all Reserve Bank

services, with the exception of functional groupings for Monetary
and Economic Policy and Supervision and Regulations, and account for
approximately 88 percent of total expenditures in the Reserve Banks.
Based upon preliminary information, Reserve Bank output
per manhour in 1977 rose sharply with some of the gain achieved
through substitution of capital for labor.

Our estimate of the

increase in total factor productivity, which measures changes in the
use of both capital

and labor against changes in output,

is 10

percent for 1977.
Capital expenditures totaled an estimated $71.8 million at
the

Reserve

Banks

and $4.1 million

at the Board

during

1977.

Construction of new buildings at Richmond and Boston and purchase of
automation equipment accounted for most of the outlays of the Reserve
Banks.

Renovation of the Board building and a computer upgrade

accounted for most of the outlays at the Board.




-

4

-

1978 Budget
I would now like.to review our budgets and plans for this
year.

The 1978 Reserve Bank operating expense budgets total $722.2

million, an increase of $36.8 million or 5.4 percent over estimated
1977 expenses.

Capital outlays are estimated to be $64.8 million,

declining $7.0 million from the 1977 estimate primarily due to the
completion of the new Boston and Richmond Federal Reserve Banks by
early 1978.

Total outlays.of funds (capital plus operating expenses

adjusted for depreciation) are expected to reach $765.6 million,
representing an increase of 3.0 percent over 1977 expenses.
The 1978 Reserve Bank budgets reflect the continuation of
efforts to improve the efficiency of operations.

In 1978 the Reserve

Banks expect to operate with 24,007 employees, a staff reduction of
486 or 2.0 percent below the estimated 1977 level.
Output per manhour is projected to increase by more than 10
percent, a rate similar to that in each of the previous two years.
This productivity gain, adjusted for the substitution of capital for
labor, yields a total factor productivity increase of 8.3 percent,
which is considerably larger than estimates of productivity growth
for the private sector.
The principal portion of the cost increases is expected in
expenses for employees' and officers' salaries, and retirement and
other benefits.

These increased expenses constitute 55 percent of

the $36.8 million




increase in total expenses.

Even so, salary

- 5 -

expenses are expected to rise by only 4.1 percent, as Reserve Banks
reduce further their number of employees and continue to exercise
firm control over salary increases.

With a salary policy based on

performance, the Banks are able to reward outstanding performers
while keeping salary expenses to a minimum.
increasing 8.8 percent, reflecting

Benefits expenses are

the cost of a fully funded

retirement program for current employees, adjusted pension rates for
currently retired employees, and the upward movement in insurance
costs and Social Security rates.
The increased cost of Federal Reserve currency represents
15 percent of the total expense increase and is an expense largely
beyond the control of the Reserve Banks since the Bureau of Engraving
and Printing sets the price for printing and the public demand
determines the volume to be issued.

Such costs are expected to

advance 9.8 percent over 1977 reflecting a higher unit price from the
Bureau and a larger demand for currency.
Increased depreciation expenses on property and equipment
account for another 20 percent of the advance in total expenses of
the

Reserve

Banks.

Property

depreciation

W .11

increase

$4.1

million, primarily reflecting the completion of the new Boston and
Richmond Federal Reserve Bank buildings.
will rise $3.4 million.

Equipment depreciation

The primary causes of the increase in

equipment depreciation expense are computer upgrading, the acquisi­
tion of high-speed currency processing machines, and the installa-




- 6 -

tion of new equipment in the Boston and Richmond Federal Reserve
Banks.
The projected 6.1 percent increase in volume of operations
affects

primarily

Institutions
percent)

and

the
the

expenses

Public

and for Services

for

Services

to

$26.6

million

(increasing

to the U.S.

Financial
or

5.1

Treasury and Government

Agencies (increasing $3.6 million or 4.6 percent).

These output

costs reflect full distribution and allocation of support and over­
head

services.

In these

volume-related

areas,

unit costs are

projected to decline nearly one percent from 1977.
In

1978

the

Federal

Reserve

Banks

will

continue

to

experience increased expenses associated with expanding regulatory
responsibilities

and

revisions

to examination

procedures.

The

latest program instituted in this area is the annual inspection of
most

bank

holding companies with consolidated assets over $300

million and the implementation of a standardized "Report of Bank
Holding

Company

Examination."

The

Supervision

and Regulation

function shows an expense increase of $5.8 million or 10.6 percent
and 90 additional staff or a rise of 7.0 percent.

As these programs

reach full-scale implementation, additional costs may need to be
funded.
Other

System projects

scheduled

for 1978

include

the

automated clearing house program, Treasury check truncation, and the
Bankwire settlement.




The automated clearing house program, in which

- 7 -

both government and commercial payments are processed, is planned to
include interregional clearings of commercial payments.

We antici­

pate that this expansion will facilitate long-run economies.

That

is, it will act as an incentive for the conversion of check payments
to electronic payments, which will ultimately reduce unit processing
costs.

As you may know, the Treasury estimates this program now

saves approximately $1 million per month.
The

Treasury

check

truncation

effort

entails

the

conversion of the data on the check to magnetic tape, with the tapes
and a microfilm of the paid checks being sent to the Treasury for
processing and the checks being sent to a GSA storage facility.

The

Treasury expects this truncation procedure to improve reconcilement
of Social Security and welfare payments and to accelerate responses
to beneficiaries when questions arise.
As you will recall, during this Committee's hearings on
Federal Reserve payments mechanism activities last year, inquiries
were made

concerning

access to System settlement facilities

by

Bankwire.

I am pleased to report that the Board announced plans,

late last year, to provide such facilities to Bankwire in order to
encourage private alternatives in electronic funds transfers.
The

anticipated

capital

outlays

during 1978 primarily

relate to building programs, computer acquisitions and upgrades, and
purchase of high-speed currency processing equipment.

The $17.9

million in the Buildings account reflects the completion of the




- 8 -

Boston and Richmond Bank buildings and the initial phases of new
building construction at Miami and San Francisco.

Outlays will also

be made to consolidate New York Bank operations now located in
several outside facilities, and preliminary costs will be incurred
for site and architectural plans for the new Baltimore building.
Outlays

for

Data

Processing/Data

Communications

equipment

are

expected to account for about one-fifth of the capital spending.
Of special

interest are the planned purchases of high­

speed currency machines.

After a five year research and development

program, our efforts are coming to fruition.

We expect these new

machines to sort currency, separate fit from unfit and counterfeit
from genuine as well as destroy the unfit notes.

Our costs of

handling currency are expected to decline on a per unit basis and
output per manhour will increase sharply.
The 1978 Board operating budget totals $47.6 million, an
increase of $4.0 million or 9.3 percent over 1977 estimated operating
expenses.

The approved capital budget is projected at $10.5 million,

bringing the total 1978 approved outlays to $58.1 million.
The authorized staff positions at the Board are projected
to decline slightly in 1978 to a level of 1,568.

This decrease is a

direct result of the Board's program to reduce its overall position
complement while reallocating resources to high priority areas such
as surveillance of banks and bank holding companies.




- 9 -

The increase in the Board's operating budget is reflective
of its labor-intensive environment and, measured in real resources,
shows a slight decline.
the

full-year

effect

Expenses for personnel services including
of

the

1977

Government-wide

general

pay

increase, the annualized cost of 1977 salary actions, expected 1978
salary actions and a cost-of-living increase in pensions to our
retirees,

account for 93 percent of the total operating budget

increase over 1977.

New initiatives are planned in the regulatory

area to strengthen bank and bank holding company inspection and
surveillance
Volume

programs

increases

and the examination

are also expected

of trust

activities.

in the areas of Freedom of

Information requests, and material distributed for consumer educa­
tion and information.
The

Board's

capital

budget

includes

$9.1

million

to

complete the renovation of the Board building and $1.4 million to
permit more intensive use of the Annex building.

Both of these

projects are expected to be completed in 1978 and are designed to
provide for the accommodation of all our staff in the two adjacent
buildings.

We expect to realize annual savings of nearly $1 million

in lease costs.

1978 Budget Process
The basic philosophy governing the formulation of the
Reserve 3anks'




budget

is established early in the year

as the

- 10 -

Conference of Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board
of Governors begin the annual budget process with the development of
budget

objectives

and

guidelines.

Following

discussions

and

modifications of underlying assumptions between the Conference and
the Board,

a budget

objective

based

upon these

assumptions

is

approved by the Board, usually in the second quarter of the year.
The 1978 budget objective for the Federal Reserve Banks
established a permissible range of expenditure increases between 5.5
and 7.5 percent.

Since salary expenses represent over 45 percent of

Bank budgets, the most restrictive assumption was the 6.0 percent
increase

in total

salaries with a slight decline in employment.

Productivity gains were assumed to average 7.3 percent Systemwide
and volume was projected to increase by 7 percent.
As

in prior

years,

the

Board's

Committee on Federal

Reserve Bank Activities reviewed the preliminary budgets of the
Banks for compliance with the budget guidelines.

Following meetings

between the Bank Presidents and the Committee and the careful review
by the Boards of Directors at each Bank, the final 1978 budget
proposals were reduced by $7.9 million.
The budget guidelines for 1978 consisted,
offsetting new initiatives with reductions elsewhere.

in part, of
Both the

Banks and the Board achieved this objective in their approved budgets
primarily through improvements in productivity.

Staff increases

necessary to meet the new initiatives were offset by decreases in




- 11 -

other

staff

areas

at the Board

and by decreases

in operating

personnel at the Reserve Banks.
This

year's

budget

development

process

for the Board

included the adoption of zero-base budgeting concepts to prepare and
review the 1978 budget.

The Board's divisions were required to

review all existing and proposed new programs and submit for manage­
ment review a budget in the form of discrete program levels of effort
with a division ranking.

Each division's budget was reviewed by the

Office of the Controller,

the Staff Director for Management,

a

Committee of Board Members, and by the Vice Chairman of the Board.
In the course of these reviews, $1.5 million was deleted from the
1978 budget proposals after making room for high priority items.

A

conscientious effort was made during the review process to stress
improvements

in

productivity

and

eliminate

all

but

the

most

essential expenditures.
The Federal Reserve Banks have been experimenting with the
zero-base budgeting process since 1976.

During 1977, the Federal

Reserve Bank of Minneapolis implemented zero-base budgeting in three
staff areas in order to assess the effectiveness of this management
tool

for

the

budget

addition,

the

Federal

decision-making
Reserve

Bank

process
of

at the Bank.

Chicago

used

In

zero-base

budgeting to prepare the Bank's Research, Bank Relations and Public
Information departments'

1978 budgets.

The Board

is presently

assessing the Board's and Banks' experience in the use of zero-base
budgeting.




- 12 -

Summary
In summary,

the Board's

1978 budget represents

percent growth over 1977 estimated expenses.

a 9.3

This number implies no

additional use of real resources and requires the achievement of
additional productivity gains in 1978.
fund

new

initiatives

and volume

The overriding constraint to

increases through decreases

in

current activities and gains in productivity has been met.
Budgets of the Federal Reserve Banks also reflect the
continuation of efforts to improve the efficiency of operations.

The

projected 5.4 percent increase in operating expenses compares with
an average annual growth rate of 13.6 percent from 1970 through 197^
and 7.7 percent from 1974 through 1977.

Total employment at the

Reserve Banks has declined by 2,156 employees or 8.1 percent over the
last three years, and an additional reduction of 2.0 percent is
projected for 1978.
Our weighted unit cost of clearing checks,

processing

currency and coin, issuing and redeeming Treasury and other Govern­
ment agency securities, and performing all other measurable output
activities has increased by about 1 percent per year over the threeyear period from 1974 through 1977 projections.
adjusted

for

higher

prices

paid

for

If unit costs are

resources--that

is

for

inflation--real unit costs have declined by approximately 7 percent
per year.
The performance record of the Federal Reserve System over
the past few years clearly indicates the high degree of success the




- 13 -

System

has

achieved

operational efficiency.

through

its

internal

efforts

to

improve

The Board believes that its review and

budget processes have created an atmosphere of cost-consciousness
that has resulted in better productivity, cost efficiency, service
to the public, and ultimate savings to the tax-paying public.