View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FROM;
THE AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION
THE NEWS BUREAU
George J, Kelly, Director
12 East 36 St., New York 1 6, N, Y.
MU 5-5100

RELEASED AT 11 A.M.
TUESDAY, MAY 7, 1963

ADDRESS OF M c MONROE ICEMBREL
President of The American Bankers Association, before the
73<3. Annual Convention of the Tennessee Bankers Association,
Andrew Johnson Hotel, Knoxville, Tuesday Morning, May 7> 19^3*
Mr. Kimbrel is chairman of the board, First National
Bank, Thomson, Ga.

Tennessee bankers know better than anyone else that the immediate past
president of The American Bankers Association sets a fast pace.

I can tell you

from personal experience that he also provides banking with the finest possible
representation throughout the country.

In covering some of the routes traveled by

Sam Fleming last year, I am constantly reminded of the outstanding job he did as
A.B.A. president,
Thanks to the leadership of Sam Fleming and others in your state,
Tennesseans understand very well the role and responsibility of commercial banks in
our present-day economy.
audience.

I would not presume to define that role for this

The performance of your own banks in a state where competition and

economic progress are both on the upswing indicates that you need no outside advice
on that score— even from a neighbor.
I want to draw your attention to a question that is perhaps more personal
and just as pertinent to the future of American banking.

Are we doing today all

we can and should do as individual bankers to provide the direction and judgment
and vision that our industry clearly will need tomorrow?
In traveling a majority of the states during the past several years,
I ’ve observed that you can pretty well tell a banker by the problems that keep him



(More)

ADDRESS OF M, MONROE KIMBREL

company.

2

Whether his shop is big or small--whether his customers are industrial

giants or family farmers— whatever his section of the country— the problems are
basically the same.
We worry, for example, about educating and training young people for a
business career that grows progressively complicated and demanding.

We 1re

concerned about automation and its impact on profits and personnel.

We puzzle

over auditing procedures and cost studies and the prospects for new business.

We

fret over laws and regulations that often appear to stifle enterprise, and we wonder
how to cope with increasing competition from government and government-subsidized
institutions.
These are a few of the problems we all share.

Their solution requires,

as a bare minimum, that we be informed and that we act effectively as a group.
They require, in short, a team effort in which individuals work together for the
common good.
In The American Bankers Association and our respective state associations,
we have the means of asserting that kind of effort.
enough.

But membership alone is not

It takes active, participating members--bankers willing to give of

their time and talent--to make the team go.

And, most of all, it takes a firm

unity of purpose on the part of all of us— an awareness that the ties which unite
us as commercial bankers are far more important than the things which divide us.
Where this spirit is translated into association action, we do a good
job for banking.

Let me cite some examples among our current projects of general

interest.
The banking industry has been for many years an acknowledged leader in
the field of practical education*

In establishing the American Institute of Banking

and The Ston&er Graduate School, bankers of an earlier era anticipated the need
for permanent educational facilities within the industry.



(More)

The A.I.B. and the

ADDRESS OF M. MONROE KIMBREL

Graduate School

3

have more than fulfilled the hopes of their founders*

They have

been widely imitated by other business groups, and they continue to serve today
as the foundation of banking1s educational structure.
However, it became evident a few years ago that something more was needed.
With additional regional and state schools springing up and a rising demand for
specialized instruction, some over-all appraisal of the situation obviously
was in order.

The Banking Education Committee of the A.B.A., at the suggestion

of the managing officers of the state associations, made a comprehensive study
of the problem and undertook to meet it.
The results, after three years, are highly gratifying.

The Banking

Education Committee has opened clear lines of communication with and among the
various sponsors of banking schools.

The committee, at the same time, has greatly

expanded banking*s contacts and information exchanges with educators from the
secondary to the graduate level*

We now have, for the first time, a really

effective liaison with the professional educators who determine how and what our
youngsters are taught about banking and related subjects.
The 1,100 students attending the

1963

resident session of The Stonier

Graduate School next month will find standards of instruction higher and course
offerings more varied than ever before.

The A.I.B., with an enrollment of l8X,000,

has extended its reach this year by organizing study teams in areas where the
banking population is too small to support chapters or study groups.
In addition, we will add, this year and next, two schools at the national
level offering concentrated courses in specialized service areas.

The A.B.A.*s

National Mortgage School will open at Ohio State University in Columbus in August.
Plans for a National Instalment Credit School were approved only last month,
and the inaugural session will be held after the first of the year at a site still
to be selected.



These facilities, together with The National Trust School which
(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MONROE KIMBREL

Il­

ls held each August at Northwestern University, will afford a wide range of
educational opportunities for A.B.A. member bank personnel.
Two points deserve special emphasis.

First, this long-range, coordinated

approach to banking education needs did not just happen; it is the product of a
lot of thinking and a lot of hard work by bankers throughout the country and
A.B.A. staff people who understand the vital interdependence of banking and
education.

And, secondly, superior facilities and standards will be of value to

you only to the extent that you use and support them.
Two other banking fronts where the action has been fast and furious in
recent years are automation and market research.

Advances in equipment technology

and continuing improvements in system design and procedures are bringing the
advantages— and challenges--of automated equipment within reach of more and more
banks.

TC expand its services to member banks in this area, your A.B.A. in

January established a new department of automation and market research.
The department already is functioning in a broad area.

It is serving

as a central source of information on standards evaluation and research.

It has

planned a National Automation Conference— the first under A.B.A. auspices— to
be held in Chicago in November.

By maintaining close working relationships with

equipment manufacturers, other associations and government agencies, it will enable
the A.B.A. to assume its natural and proper role of leadership in this increasingly
important field.

The resulting services, I hardly need point out, will be of

particular value to medium-sized and smaller banks for which automation poses
special problems.

Indeed, the program will be geared largely--though not

entirely--to the needs of those banks.
This work would not be possible without the efforts of expert and
dedicated bankers.

I have in mind especially the members of our Bank Management

Committee who labored some five years to develop a Magnetic Ink Character



(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MONROE KIMBKEL

5

Recognition code which is now in use not only in the United States hut in a number
of countries abroad.

From the contributions of a relatively few individuals

serving on this committee and related A.33.A. groups, all of banking has realized
tremendous benefits*
Another recent example of the practical value of association teamwork
involves compliance by banks with the laws and regulations on taxpayer account
numbering and reporting of savings interest payments*

Like any other departure from

established routine, the new system was bound to result in some confusion and
expense.

To provide our member banks with the facts and guidance in adjusting

to them, a special committee of the Savings Division prepared a readable and
comprehensive booklet titled "Numbering and Reporting."

I*ve heard a number of

complaints about operating problems under the new system--but I have yet to hear
one that the bank could not accommodate by following the suggestions contained
in the "Numbering and Reporting" booklet.
Personnel and management development is still another area calling for
our best joint effort.

Your A.B.A* recently initiated a series of courses in

fundamentals of bank personnel administration to be given in different regions of
the country.

Two were conducted last March in Ohio and Minnesota, with the

co-sponsorship of 13 state bankers associations.

A similar course will be

scheduled for a region including Tennessee within the next year.

And next week,

in Chicago, our second annual National Personnel Conference will develop the
theme:

"Increasing Profits Through Effective Personnel Administration."
I would hesitate to single out any one of these industrywide challenges

as being more important than the others.

I am convinced, however, that the need

for banking teamwork is nowhere more urgent than in our relations with the Congress
and the Administration in Washington.




(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MOWROE KIMBREL

6

In this sector, too, it is our ability to recognize common interests
and common goals that determines how well we advance banking*s cause*
We have in

Washington a strong and capable staff--men who know the

ways of Congress and the Executive Departments and whose talents are widely
respected.

As a former chairman of the A.B.A. Federal Legislative Committee, I can

report without qualification that commercial banking*s interests are today
represented and fairly served in the nation*s capital.
As you know, the Congress last year placed on the statute books for the
first time a requirement that savings and loan associations pay substantial Federal
income taxes.

While the action fell short of full tax uniformity, it was

nonetheless a significant and welcome recognition of commercial banking*s case for
tax justice among competing financial institutions.
The Congress last year rejected a strong Administration bid for compulsory
withholding of tax on dividends and interest, and instead passed the reporting
provision I referred to earlier.

In my opinion, the A.B.A. played a leading

part in developing the facts and reasoning which led members of Congress to turn
down the withholding proposal.
The Bank Service Corporation Act of

1962

removed Federal restrictions

on investment by banks in a service corporation utilizing modern equipment for
the benefit of its joint owners.

Your association vigorously supported the

legislation and helped steer it through the Congress, pointing out that it would
especially aid smaller banks which cannot afford to purchase their own
automatic equipment.
The so-called "Truth-in-Lending” bill, which would require, among other
things, that lenders state charges in terms of the simple annual rate, has
been pending in the Congress for a number of years.

We*ve testified repeatedly

that in our judgment the measure is not needed and that it would confuse borrowers
and be impossible to administer.



The bill has made no progress to date.
(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MONROE KIMBREL

7

I could cite other legislative developments of the recent past, indicating
that our Washington representation has teen more than effective.

But

what has happened is not so important as why it has happened.
The basic reason we have been effective is that commercial banking as a
rule has been speaking up in Washington--clearly, affirmatively, and with a
single voice.
It wasn’t always so.

Not too many years ago, organized banking shied

away from expressing itself on important issues that appeared to raise the risk
of controversy; the industry had many spokesmen.

The result was a lot of confusion

in the Congress and very little constructive banking legislation.
My friends, we will serve neither the public nor banking’s interest
if we permit that situation to recur.
As commercial bankers, we share a broad and compelling identity of
purpose.

We want the banking system to grow in strength and service.

Our

individual separate institution can prosper only as the system— and the economy—
prosper.

This is the point down the road that we ’re all striving for.

If we are

going to be truly effective as an industry, we must arrive there together.

In

order to do that, we will have to reconcile or subordinate whatever differences
develop along the way.
I mention this in connection with our Federal legislative program
because it is there that a lack of unity can have the most damaging effect.
Proposals of great importance to banking are now awaiting action in the
Congress.

They involve the future structure and authority of Federal supervisory

agencies, an opportunity for commercial banks to participate more fully in the
home mortgage lending field, and a variety of other issues.




(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MOHROE KIMBREL

8

The House Banking and Currency Committee presently is considering a
bill which would increase maximum F.D.I.C. insurance for each bank depositor
from $10,000 to $25,000*

The limit on insurance of savings and loan association

share accounts would be raised by the same amount*

Your association has concluded

on the basis of studies by several committees, that there is no demonstrated need
for the increase.

Of all accounts in insured banks today, only 1,8 per cent have

ffiore than $10,000*

We believe, moreover, that the future growth and service of

the dual banking system should be founded upon public confidence in banks
rather than upon the reliance of the depositing public in Government insurance.
An A.B.A. spokesman piesented this position to the Committee week
before last.

He made it clear, however, that if the Congress should decide in

favor of an increase, the action should apply equally to both types of insurance.
The President*s proposal for rate reductions and structural changes
in the tax system also has been the subject of intensive A.B.A. study.
Since the tax question is the biggest issue in Congress this year,
I think I should explain how the A.B.A. arrived at the position which was
presented in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee on March 18.
You will recall that last summer there was much talk about a "quickie”
tax cut.

When the various ideas were being debated in the press, the Economic

Policy Committee and the Government Borrowing Committee were meeting at the
same time in Washington.

These two groups plus members of the Administrative

Committee met to discuss what position the association should take on the
subject of tax cuts.

As you know, the 17-man Administrative Committee in the

top A.B.Ao governing body between meetings of the Executive Council.
A tentative position was agreed upon but was not announced publicly.
The tentative position was, however, communicated to the Administration.




(More)

ADDRESS OF M* MONROE KIMBKEL

9

After additional study, the Associations position was formalized in
a resolution at the

1962

annual convention in Atlantic City.

the resolution stressed these points:

As you recall,

that the A.B.A. Believes a tax cut

would he good for the economy, that the cut should he spread over a three-year
period to reduce the impact on revenues; that the level of Federal spending
should he held constant during the transition period to lower tax rates; and
finally, that budget deficits during the transition period would have to he
financed in a non-inflationary manner.

We further stated that unless these safeguards

were met, a tax cut at this time should he rejected.
When the President submitted his tax proposal, I appointed a special
committee to study the proposal to see how it measured up to the safeguards
specified in our convention resolution*

On the basis of that study,

Dr. Charls E* Walker, our executive president, testified on behalf of the
association.

And I would quickly add that he did a tremendous job and his

testimony was well received by members of the committee.
In brief, he stated that the association has long recognized the need
for and the benefits to be derived from a soundly structured tax reduction.
However, he also pointed out that unless means can be found to hold budgeted
expenditures for fiscal 1964 to the actual expenditures for fiscal

1963,

as

estimated by the President in January, the tax cut should be flatly rejected
by Congress at this time.
The A.B.A. also made several specific recommendations on the various
proposals included in the Presidents tax message.

We opposed the idea of a

5 per cent floor on itemized personal deductions, the capital gains tax on
estates, and some of the other structural changes recommended by the President.




(More)

ADDRESS OF M. MONROE KIMBREL

10

At this time it appears probable that there will be a tax bill enacted
this year that will provide for a substantial cut in both corporate and
individual income tax rates*

Moreover, the nation*s bankers should have a sense

of satisfaction that some of the recommendations we made early in the debate
have been incorporated into the proposal that is now being considered*
reduction will be phased in to reduce the budgetary impact*

The tax

At the same

time Federal Reserve and Treasury officials have stated publicly that they are
determined to finance the debt in a non -inflat ionary manner*
Meanwhile, we hope that Congress can find effective means to hold
spending to the present level*
In summing up, let me say that this year--the Centennial year of the
dual banking system--finds bankers facing many problems*
demanding in terms of both time and energy.

These problems are

Yet some of these problems can be

simplified if bankers can join forces at the state and national level and work
together toward their solution*
By actively participating in association affairs and by contributing
knowledge from your specialized fields you can help improve the entire level
of banking.
interest.

It seems to me that this is nothing more than enlightened self
For, in the last analysis, the benefits will redound to you and

your bank.




#