View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.

Its a real pleasure for me

to join a group that Charles Worsham, your Association's
Executive Vice President, called "the survivors of Louisiana
banking.
/

There is no question that we are in an era of significant change
for our nation's economic system.

With those changes will come

subsidiary changes to the banking industry and other financial
institutions.

It is going to take survival-oriented leadership

to succeed in this environment, and you are to be congratulated
for the measure of success you have thus far obtained.

That reminds me of a story a friend told me about a college
reunion he recently attended.

While there, my friend stopped by

to visit an old economics professor still actively teaching well
into his eighties.

During the visit he idly picked up some examination papers on
the professor's desk.

To my friend's surprise, he noticed that

the questions were essentially the same as when he'd taken the
course decades earlier.




2

My friend mentioned this to the professor, saying that he
expected the questions would have been very different after such
a long period.

"No", the professor explained, "the questions actually change
very little.

Over the years only the answers seem to change"...

I believe we are dealing with that phenomena right now —
Washington —

and right here in Louisiana.

in

And we have no

choice but to have to find new answers to those old questions.

Let me begin this morning with a discussion of the current state
of Louisiana banking, as seen through the eyes of a deposit
insurer.

I'll then turn to several other related issues I

believe are important to the future of U. S. banking.

This is not a report card of how Louisiana banks have done, per
se.

It is my attempt to provide you with a straightforward

assessment of what I see in both results and trends —
good and bad news —




in your state's banking industry.

both the

3

It is understood, of course, that banking in any area follows
underlying business and economic trends.

There are few places

where this connection is more obvious than Louisiana.

In the

1980s your State's strong dependency on oil-related industries
has provided both a boom —
coaster ride —

and a bust.

You've been on a roller

and its not over yet!

Despite a modest recovery in late 1987 and 1988, Louisiana's
relatively undiversified economic base, high unemployment, and
low rate of income growth have given your banks a very
substantial challenge.

I recently heard a story about two experts arguing about the
financial condition of the oil patch states.
there was a money shortage.
statement.

One man insisted

The other scoffed at this

"There's no shortage of money,” he said, "Go to the

bank and ask them to show you all the money stored in vaults.
Money by the millions.

And in every bank too.

But ask them to

lend you some of it, and they ask you what collateral you have.
That's where the trouble is.

There is plenty of money, but a

very serious shortage of collateral"!

[pause]




4

The problem in Louisiana has been that much of your collateral
is not worth what it used to be —
toll.

and that has taken a heavy

Louisiana has had six banks fail so far in 1989, in

addition to 13 in 1988, 15 in 1987, and 9 in 1986.
Unfortunately, you do not appear fully out of the woods yet, but
certainly you are no longer in the deepest depths of the jungle
either.

Small favors, as they say.

On a more positive note, we are pleased at the FDIC to see that
your State now authorizes statewide branching.

We hope this

will mean fewer bank failures in the future.

Another bright spot is that, overall, Louisiana's banking sector
registered a modest profit for 1988, indicating a light at the
end of the tunnel.

Your banks' broke even last year, as reflected in the third
quarter numbers I will be using throughout this report.

Last

year's income is certainly not a record to be satisfied with,
but it is a significant improvement over the previous two years
of losses.

It also compares favorably with the overall record

of Southwest banks that posted a.negative 0.78 percent return.




5

At the FDIC we are especially heartened by the fact that the
number of your banks with full-year losses was considerably
lower in 1988.

This bodes well for a lower bank failure rate in

Louisiana in the future, and for the fiscal health of the FDIC
fund.

Key factors in this improving earnings picture were lower loan
losses and smaller provisioning for future losses.

Better

control of overhead costs also contributed to this development.

Another positive in the earnings area is that Louisiana banks
reporting operating losses have fallen sharply —

from 41.3

percent in 1987, to 26.7 percent through third quarter 1988.

For your 203 commercial banks with less than $100 million in
assets —

losses continued, but at a significantly reduced rate.

The average annualized return on assets showed substantial
improvement, increasing to a negative 0.02 percent, up from a
negative 0.51 percent.

These losses still reflect very high

levels of nonperforming assets, net charge-offs and loan-loss
provisions.

After giving you a look at your smaller banks, it seems only
fair to take a look at the earnings of your 55 largest banks
with assets over $100 million.



6

On average, these larger banks reported an annualized return on
assets of 0.01 percent in the first nine months of 1988.
Unfortunately, this is a decline from the 0.13 percent realized
in 1987.

Like the smaller banks, these banks are also heavily

burdened by very high levels of nonperforming assets, net
charge-offs and loan-loss provision.

Turning from the earnings story, another area of general
improvement is the average asset quality found in your banks.

Aggregate nonperforming assets declined to 7.43 percent in 1988,
down from 1987's mark of 7.97 percent.

The most troubled loan

types continue to be real estate and commercial loans.

It is also encouraging that nonperforming assets declined
despite lower net charge-offs, which were down to 2.07 percent.
However, we need to look to even further improvements in asset
quality so that Louisiana's banks can return to their
traditional levels of profitability.

Capitalization is an area that also experienced modest
improvement.

Your bank's average equity capital grew slightly

in 1988, climbing over twenty basis points to 7.19 percent.
That reverses two years of declining capitalization.

And the

extra cushion your banks are developing is good news for the
FDIC, as it is for you.



7

But that cushion is not as plump as we might hope.

Loan loss

reserves were down last year, and that despite the fact that
reserve coverage of nonperforming assets was less than half the
national average.

The lack of a substantial reserve cushion to

absorb future losses probably means that Louisiana banks'
earnings will continue to be held down by future loan
charge-offs.

So how does all this add up on my neon scoreboard?
looking up for Louisiana banking —

Things are

but only modestly.

There

are plenty of problems and challenges left for you survivors.

In many ways, the answer to the question of how good 1989 will
be for your banks depends on the answer to another question —
Will oil prices rise?

Not being clairvoyant in all areas —

even as a federal official —

we will have to wait and see.

In any case, the key to Louisiana's long-term health requires
substantial diversification of your State's economy so that your
future is not forever tied to what happens at oil rigs thousands
of miles away.

I'd like to now turn quickly to a few other issues facing the
banking industry and the FDIC today that I thought might be of
interest to this group.

[Insert discussion on short capsule issues.]



8

[Conclusion]
Well, that brings me almost to the end of my talk, and to the
beginning of what I'm certain will be an interesting question
period.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the situation facing
Louisiana's bankers can be summed up in a litany of cliche's I
recently heard that seemed as numerous as the gallons of water
in Lake Ponchatrain.

It went like this:

The difficulties of today's Louisiana banking industry are such
that bankers like yourselves must keep your backs to the wall —
your ears to the ground —

your shoulders to the wheel —

noses to the grindstone —

your heads level —

your

and your feet on

the ground!

At the same time, however, you must have your heads in the
clouds so that you can look for the silver lining!

It won't be easy —

and you know that better than I —

but I'm

betting that you survivors are, by and large, going to be
successful.

Good luck.

Thank you for your attention.
questions.



I'll be pleased now to take your