View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

SUMMARY OF REMARKS
before the
Meeting of Third District Congressmen
with
Members of the Board of Directors
and Senior Officers of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
at the Capitol
Wednesday, June 29» 1966

Dr. Willis J. Winn, Dean of the Wharton School of Finance and
Commerce of the University of Pennsylvania, and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, opened the meet­
ing by stating its purpose as that of providing a means for the members
of the Board of the Philadelphia Bank to put before Third District
Congressmen some problems with vhich they had been concerned. He stated
that the Board took quite seriously its responsibilities for helping to
maintain a sound banking system and the integrity of the dollar and that
in this task they felt it essential to communicate from time to time with
Congressional lawmakers who had created the Federal Reserve System and
exercised surveillance over it. Dean Winn expressed his confidence in
the Federal Reserve System but observed that neither he nor the other
directors had a vested interest in it; however, unless and until a differ­
ent system for providing an adequate monetary structure were created, he
felt it was essential that the present one not be permitted to break down
at any point by default.
Dean Winn introduced the other directors present:
Bayard L. England, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman
of the Board of the Atlantic City Electric Company, Atlantic City, New
Jersey? Ralph K. Gottshall, Chairman of the Board, Atlas Chemical Industries,
Inc., Wilmington, DelawareJ and D. Robert Yarnall, Jr., President Yarvay
Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa. He then called upon Karl R. Bopp, President
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

/ a s . Role of the Federal Reserve Bank
Mr. Bopn outlined briefly the scope of activity of a Federal
Reserve Bank, indicating that its President had a concern for international
affairs as well as for national monetary policy making. At the same time,
he had to interest himself in the economics of his Bank’s region, inter­
preting regional problems to the Board in Washington and relating national
policy to the region and to the member banks of the District. He pointed
out the difficulty of reconciling different — but quite valid — national
objectives and indicated the appropriateness of a Federal system to deal
with this. In terms of monetary objectives, he expressed great concern




-

2

-

that a city the size of Reading, Pennsylvania, because of withdrawals from
the Federal Reserve System, now had the prospect of being without a Federal
Reserve member bank.

The Third District Economy
Mr. David P. Eastburn, Vice President, Research, of the Philadelphia
Bank, spoke on economic developments within the Third Federal Reserve
District. His remarks are summarized in the attached booklet. Several
Congressmen expressed interest in an elaboration of the statistics which
were presented, and Mr. Eastburn assured them that he would be very happy
to cooperate with Congressional staff in providing such regional material
as was available to him. He hoped that he might also call on Congressional
offices from time to time to obtain information.

Banking in the Third District
Mr. David C. Melnicoff, Vice President in charge of the CreditDiscount function, spoke on developments in banking. He pointed out that
banks had shared in the boom of the last five years, but that, while the
banking system had responded well to the current challenge, recent changes
had produced pressures on liquidity positions and stresses and strains with­
in the financial structure had generated sane obvious abrasions and com­
plaints.
He pointed out that there were several elements making for a
banking revolution within the past five or ten years. One of these is the
size and nature of the expansion of banking activity. For instance, loans
by commercial banks in the United States have increased over 75% since I960.
(The rate of growth in the Third Federal Reserve District has been closer
to 60%f paralleling the somewhat slower rate of general economic growth.)
For Philadelphia Savings and Loans, the measure of growth during this period
was somewhat slower than this, but it had been considerably faster during
the previous decade.

Pressure on the Banking System
What has placed pressure on the banks is a change in the nature
of commercial bank liabilities. In the United States in I96U — and in the
Third District in 1963 — commercial bank time deposits exceeded demand
deposits for the first time in modern history. Time deposits have grown
steadily in proportion ever since. Commercial banks have functioned more
as intermediaries in recent years, seeking to recapture some of the busi­
ness that had been taken from them by specialized institutions; and this
has placed them in more direct competition for funds with the savings and
loans and mutual savings banks.




- 3 -

As the pace of the boom has quickened and demands for credit have
increased, the competition for savings has pushed interest rates upward*
The nature of regulatory rules and limitations during the past year or so
apparently has enabled the commercial banks to take a larger share of nev
savings, though it is only very recently that the savings institutions have
experienced any absolute decline in deposits. The higher rates, of course,
have introduced a new and important element of banking cost.

Interest Rate Ceilings
A number of questions were raised concerning suggestions that
ceilings be placed on the interest rates which commercial banks may pay
for savings deposits, in an effort to prevent the diversion of savings from
those institutions which traditionally and by law make their major invest­
ment in the field of housing. Many have become alarmed at the recent de­
cline in housing starts and attribute it to a lack of mortgage money.
Mr. Melnicoff and others pointed out that as the entire structure of
interest rates had shifted upward, savers had a number of investment
alternatives. A ceiling on commercial bank time deposit rates might re­
sult merely in a shift of funds to other intermediaries or users. More­
over, in a period when demand for credit was outrunning available produc­
tion resources the one way to satisfy all demands, including mortgage money
demands, at a fixed interest rate would be to create as much credit as the
market desired. This could result in a first-class inflation and the
Federal Reserve was resisting it, though it was still permitting a gradual
increase in the money supply.
Questions were raised, too, about the previous day’s action by
the Federal Reserve Board in increasing reserve requirements on certain
types of time deposits. Mr. Melnicoff suggested that this action was a
response to the recent consensus of the House Committee on Banking and
Currency in an effort to warn banks of some of the possible dangers inherent
in large scale use of CD’s, and sin effort to make their use somewhat more
expensive.

Mergers and Withdrawals
In conclusion, Mr. Melnicoff pointed out that technological and
personnel problems had placed great pressure on banks, especially smaller
banks, which have had difficulty in expanding new types of services made
possible by the computer. Some banks have sought relief through merger and
the number of banks in the Third Federal Reserve District, as elsewhere,
has declined in recent years. Under pressure for increased earnings, some
state member banks have withdrawn from the Federal Reserve System and more
are threatening to do so. The chief reason for this is the fact that state
reserve requirements are generally lower than those of the Federal Reserve
System. Mr. Melnicoff said that it was a worrisome thing that there was a




-

k

-

growing number of banks outside the Federal Reserve System whose liquidity
problems, should they become acute, could be alleviated by the Federal
Reserve Bank only under emergency conditions.

An Invitation
In closing, Dean Winn expressed his appreciation for the partici­
pation of the Congressmen in the discussion and reiterated the Board of
Directors* invitation that they feel free to cadi on the Federal Reserve
Bank at any time. He expressed the hope that the Congressmen would con­
tinue to be sensitive to the needs of the monetary system as they are in­
fluenced by changing economic circumstances. He did not want to discuss
any particular legislation, but indicated the Board's eagerness to main­
tain communications with the Congress on matters of mutual concern.




DELAWARE MEMBERS

IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

SENATORS

John J. Williams
Room 2213
New Senate Office Bldg.
(Millsboro, Delaware)

Room 2106
New Senate Office Bldg.
(1203 Grinnel Road
Wilmington, Delaware)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
../Harris B. McDowell, Jr.
Room 330
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(St. Ann's Church Road
Middletown, Delaware)




NEW JERSEY MEMBERS
IN THE CONGRESS OP THE UNITED STATES

SENATORS
^Clifford P. Case
Room U63
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(1128 Bryant Street
Rahway, New Jersey)

Harrison A. Williams, Jr.
Room 352
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(231 Elizabeth Avenue
Westfield, New Jersey)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1/ William T. Cahill
Room lUUo
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(1009 Park Avenue
Collingswood, New Jersey)

Thomas C. McGrath, Jr.
Room 1710
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(110 S. Kenyon Avenue
Margate City, New Jersey)

J James J.

Howard
Room 235
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(1711 Marconi Road
Wall Township, New Jersey)

X
7

Frank Thompson, Jr.
Room 2UU2
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(383 West State Street
Trenton, New Jersey)

VWilliam B. Widnall
Room 2329
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(Saddle River Road
Saddle River, New Jersey)




PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS
IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

SENATORS
^Joseph S. Clark
Room 361
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(9th and Chestnut Streets
Philadelphia, Pa.)

,/Hugh Scott
Room 260
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(Room U00U, U. S. Courthouse
Philadelphia, Pa.)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
William A. Barrett
Room 230U
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(232U Reed Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

REPRESENTATIVES - Continued
/frilliam J. Green, III
Room 1128
Longworth House Office Bldg,
(3302 H Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

George M. Rhodes
Room 2210
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(505 Brighton Avenue
Reading, Pa.)

G. Robert Watkins
Room 138
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(Oakland Road, R. D.'5
West Chester, Pa.)
Willard
l/w

Robert N. C. Nix
Room 1108
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(2139 N. 22nd Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

James A. Byrne
Room 2Ul2
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(2315 E. Cumberland Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

Herman Toll
Room 1U28
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(2323 W. 76th Ave.
Philadelphia, Pa.)




S. Curtin
Room 2U32
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(Glen Valley Road, R. D.
Morrisvilie, Pa.)

Paul B. Dague
Room 2211
Rayburn House Offiee Bldg.
(106 Uwchlan Avenue
Downingtown, Pa.)

Joseph M. McDade
Room 1131
Longworth House Office Bldg
(I6U5 N. Washington Avenue
Scranton, Pa.)

Daniel J. Flood
Room UU7
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(U60 N. Pennsylvania Ave.
Wilkes-Barre, Pa.)

-

2

-

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - Continued

/j. Irving Whalley

Room 120U
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(1309 Park Avenue
Windber, Pa.)(near Altoona)

,/Richard S. Schweiker
Room 531
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(Skippack Pike
Worcester, Pa. - Montgomery Co.)

\/Fred B. Rooney
Room 1119
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(326 Wyandotte Street
Bethlehem, Pa.)

/John C. Kunkel
Room 1729
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(2 Wiconisco Street
Harrisburg, Pa.)

y Herman T. Schneebeli
Room 1225
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(870 Hollywood Circle
Williamsport, Pa.)

J

N. Neiman Craley, Jr.
Room I62O
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(P. 0. Box 13^1
York, Pennsylvania)

John P. Saylor
Room 2351
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(Ull Orchard Street
Johnstown, Pa.)




/Albert W. Johnson
Room IU32
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(U09 Franklin Street
Smethport, Pa.)