View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MEETING WITH CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES
FROM THE THIRD FEDERAL RESERVE PISTEICT
AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA




Room S-120, Capitol, Washington, D. C.

Wednesday, March 13, 19^9

(Remarks by KRB before Congressional
Representatives from the Third Fed­
eral Reserve District and Board of
Directors of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia on Wednesday,
March 13, 1968, Room S-120, Capitol.)

We are meeting just after a very dramatic event in international
monetary developments —

the meeting of international central bankers at

Basle in which Federal Reserve representatives participated.

This meeting

emphasizes the importance of the balance of payments problem to our economy
and the role that the Federal Reserve System plays in it.

Perhaps we can

discuss some aspects of the gold problem, if you have questions about it,
later on.

That problem, however, is illustrative of only one aspect of

Federal Reserve System responsibilities.
As you

are aware, and as I indicated at our meeting in 1966, the

Federal Reserve Banks are unique among economic and quasi-governmental institu­
tions.

They have a triple responsibility —

(l) for a contribution to monetary

policy on a national scale, (2) for surveillance of economic developments in
the various regions of their districts, and (3) for supervision of and service
to banks, to other financial institutions, and the public.
All of these responsibilities and functions are closely related.

Of

particular interest to you as Congressmen representing the various states and
districts within our area, however, is the regional aspects of the work.
In the creation of the Federal Reserve System, the Congress leaned
heavily on the tradition of Regionalism which is so basic to our Federal politi­
cal structure.

Although many things have changed since 191^ and the System's

operations have been modified and adjusted, the regional aspects are still
important and useful —

not with Banks acting as advocates but rather reflecting

various shades of opinion to form a picture which has greater depth than is



- 2 -

possible in a view from Washington alone.
The orientation of Federal Reserve Banks to their regions is
especially important today as urban problems demand much local action.
Federal Reserve Banks are not directly involved in urban programs —

though

their member banks are — but they may be able to make important contributions
not otherwise possible.
civic programs.

(Several of our officers are personally involved in

Mr. Eastburn will give an illustration of research that is

important to the System and useful for regional development.)
There is another facet of Federal Reserve Regionalism which is worth
mentioning.

Now that official minutes of the Open Market Committee are published

each month, some 90 days or so after the event, it has become obvious that there
are frequent differences of view among the members of the Committee.

The Bank

president members of the Committee are, of course, influenced by what happens
in their own bailiwick; yet, this is indicative of the constructive relation­
ships between the Federal Reserve Board and the Bank presidents, there are no
views expressed that are derived fro* narrow regional interests, nor do the
opinions of the respective presidents remain long on one side of some imaginary
fence or another.

In fact, there is no "fence."

The views of the Bank president

members, which voting his own conscience, are richer for their diversity of back­
ground and environment.
There have been times in the not distant past when objectives of
monetary policy were conflicting.

This is not so today, as considerations of

maximum employment, price stability, economic growth, and international balance
all point in the same direction.

Unfortunately, this consistency does not make

the solution of our problems crystal clear.

As always, however, the System is

the stronger for its Regionalism and for its independence within the Government
than it would be as a monolithic structure.



Survey of Employment Growth in Metropolitan
Areas of the Third Federal Reserve District

Prepared for meeting of Congressional
representatives from the Third District and
Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia.




m a r c h 13,1968

vNEW
!

tv

JERSEY

M E TR O P O L ITA N A R E A S IN T H E TH IR D D IS T R IC T

The Third Federal Reserve District is an urban area.
Four out of five people in the District live in its thirteen
metropolitan areas. Many of the District’s problems,
therefore, are those of urban America.




URBAN NON-WHITE FAMILIES-1960
Although most of the District's met­
ropolitan areas in 1960 had smaller
concentrations of non-white families
than did other metropolitan areas
of the U.S., heavy concentrations
existed in Philadelphia, Atlantic City,
and Trenton.

PerCent
0
— i— i—

i ------- 1

|

i—

i

i

i

AH District SMSA’s
Ailentown-Bethlehem Easton
Altoona

■
■

\

Harrisburg
Johnstown
Lancaster

m
■

1

P N IaM pliia
Reading
Scraiton

■
i

Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton
Yorit

m

K
I
|

Atlantic City
Trenton
W R n m ita i

FAMILIES AT POVERTY LE V E L -1960




And although fewer families were
living in poverty (incomes less than
$3,000) than in all metropolitan
areas of the U.S., some areas of the
District had fairly large proportions
of poor families.

Poverty conditions undoubtedly
have improved in the last seven
years, but it is still safe to conclude
that: (a) although the District as a
whole is better off than many urban
areas of the nation, (b) problems of
poor and non-white families are
great in some parts of the District

1

U N E M P L O Y M E N T R A T E S -1 9 6 7

u. s.
Unemployment
Rate

All urban problems do not come from lack of jobs, but m any do. Unemployment in
District areas as a whole is less than in their U.S. counterparts, but is higher in
Altoona, Johnstown, Scranton, Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton and Atlantic City.

SLUM UNEMPLOYMENT AROUND THE NATION,
1966
Per cent

0

1

■ 1........

'!

..

Cleveland (Hough)
Phoenix (Salt River Bed Area)
Oakland (Bayside)
St. Louis (North Side)
Los Angeles (South L. A.)
San Francisco (Mission-Fillmore)

t

1

1

1

......
1

Philadelphia (N. Phila.)

Detroit (Central Woodward)
New Orleans (Several Areas)
San Antonio (E. & W. Sides)
New York (Harlem)
Boston (Roxbury)

It is especially high in North Philadelphia where
1 out of every 9 people in 1966 were out of work.




U N E M P L O Y M E N T TR E N D S -1 9 6 1 -1967
Th e best single solution to unemployment is national prosperity. In the past
seven years of unprecedented economic expansion, unemployment in all the
District's metropolitan areas has declined.
All District S M S A 's

Johnstown

Scranton

Wilkat-Bam-Hazleton
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton

Percent

1961

1963
1965
Altoona

Reading

1963
1965
Harrisburg




Atlantic City

E M P L O Y M E N T T R E N D S - 1950-1965
Millions Em ployed

Thousands Employed

95 F

45

1959

1962

Thousands Employed

To reduce unemployment further, however, many of the District's areas
will have to accelerate their rate of growth. This will be hard to do be­
cause, as an older established manufacturing region, the District has been
growing at a slower rate than the U.S. for some time.




6

D IS T R IC T A R E A S ’ S H A R E O F U.S. E M P L O Y M E N T -1950-1965
Per Cent

As a result 13 metropolitan areas
of the Third District hold a declin­
ing share of the employment of all
metropolitan areas of the U.S.

IMPORTANCE OF SLOW-GROWING INDUSTRIES-1965

A major problem in creating
more jobs is that industries
in many District areas are
slow-growing. Most important
of these are textiles, lumber
and wood, petroleum, primary
metals and transportation
equipment




DECLINING IMPORTANCE OF SLOW-GROWING INDUSTRIES-1950-1965
P »rOnt

70

60

SO
40

30

20

10

0
But a bright side to the future is the fact that slow-growing
industries are becoming less important in all of the District’s
metropolitan areas.




Meeting with Third District
Members of the Senate and House of Representatives

Wednesday, March 13, 1968
Capitol
Room S-120
12:30 p.m.

I.

Greetings and Introduction by Chairman Winn
This meeting reflects the concern of the Directors
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia with
their roles as overseers of the performance of the
Federal Reserve Bank and, most importantly, as con­
tributors to the making of Federal Reserve policy.
The object of this meeting is:

II.

(1)

to bring the officers of the Bank before you
to give you a glimpse of what the Bank is
doing — not by way of a formal report, and
certainly not for the purpose of discussing
specific legislation, but in the spirit and
recognition of the fact that the Federal
Reserve System is a creature of Congress;

(2)

explore the possibilities of consultation on
regional research and mutual regional problems;
and

(3)

share our concerns as directors on monetaryfiscal matters and on the continuing strength
of the Federal Reserve System.

Statement by President Karl R. Bopp on Role of Federal Reserve
Banks within the Federal Reserve System and the Interplay of
Regional Developments and National Policies




In the creation of the Federal Reserve System, Congress
leaned heavily on the tradition of Regionalism. The
Nation*s economy has changed greatly since 191^* but
regional aspects are still important and useful. The
Federal Reserve System does not act as advocate for
regional policies but rather reflects varying shades of
opinion to create a view of national problems which has
great depth.

-

2 -

The Federal Reserve Banks are not d ir e c tly involved in
programs for the solution o f urban problems, but th e ir
re g io n al o rien tatio n nay make it po ssib le for them to
make a more important contribution than would otherwise
be p o s s ib le .

III.

Review o f Regional Economic Trends by David P . Eastburn
The T h ird Federal Reserve D is t r ic t i s an u rbanized are a.
Poverty conditions undoubtedly have improved in recent
y e a r s , but i t is s t i l l safe to conclude t h a t , although
the D is t r ic t as a whole is b etter o f f than many urban
areas in the N a t io n , problems o f poor and nonwhite
fam ilies arc great in some parts o f the D i s t r i c t .
A major problem in creating more T h ird D i s t r i c t jobs
is that in d u stries in many D is t r ic t areas are slowgrowing.
Such in du stries are becoming le s s important
in a l l o f the D i s t r i c t ’ s m etropolitan a re a s.

IV .

Review o f Trends in Banking Leading to Another " T i g h t " Credit
S it u a tio n by David C. M e ln ic o ff




An i l l u s t r a t io n o f the impact o f tec h n o lo g ic al and
earnings pressure which h ig h lig h ts the d is p a r it y
in reserve re q u ire rin ts between member banks and non­
member b an ks.

DELAWARE MEMBERS
IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

SENATORS
John J. Williams
Roan 2213
New Senate Office Bldg.
(Millsboro, Delaware)

J. Caleb Boggs
Room ^109
New Senate Office Bldg.
(1203 Grinnel Road
Wilmington, Delaware)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
William V. Roth, Jr.
Room 1628
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(2701 Centerville Road
Wilmington, Delaware)




K W JBHSEY MEMBERS
II THE CONGRESS OF THE IMITI® STATES

.SENATORS

Clifford P. Case
Roo® ^63
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(1128 Bryant Street
Rahway, lew Jersey)

Harrison A. Williams, Jr. Boom 352
Old Senate Office Bldg,
(231 Elizabeth Avenue
Westfield, Rev Jersey)

(Mr. Steven Paradise, a member of Senator Williame*
staff, will attend in place of
Senator Williams)

*H O USE O F REPRESENTATIVES
W i l l i a m T. Cahill - (Mr. Nicholas D. Heil,
IIS
Boom 2kk'3
Legislative Asst,
R a y burn House Office Bldg.
will attend in plaee
(1009 Park Avenue
of W. T. Cahill)
C o l l i n g s w o o d , lew Jersey)

W i l l i a m B. Widnall
R oom 2329

Rayburn House Office Bldg«
(Saddle River Road
Saddle liver, lew Jersey)
not in o«r
District, but lie requested
that lie be invited t o the
Meeting.)

(Mr. Widnall is

John E. Hunt
loom lUUO
L ongworth House Office BUg,
(Pitman, lew Jersey)

Charles W. Sandman, Jr.
loom 1610
Longworth House O ffice Bldg.
(teas Park, lew Jersey)

J. Howa r d
Boom 1030
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(1711 Marconi Hoad
Wall Township, lew Jersey)

James

frank Thompson, Jr.
loom 2kk2
Rayburn.louse Office Bldg,
(383 West State Street
Trenton, lew Jersey)




PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS
IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

SENATORS

REPRESENTATIVES - Continued

Joseph S. Clark
Room 361
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(9th and Chestnut Streets
Philadelphia, Pa.)

YES

William J. Green, III
Room 1128
Longvorth House Office Bldg.
(120U Wakeling Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

Hugh Scott
Room 2o0
Old Senate Office Bldg.
(Room hOOU, U. S. Courthouse
Philadelphia, Pa.)

NO

George M. Rhodes
Room 2210
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(505 Brighton Avenue
Reading, Pa.)

YES

William A. Barrett
Room 230U
Rayburn Hou;s Office Bldg.
(232U Reed Street
Philadelphi a, Pa.)

Lawrence G. Williams
Room 1T^0
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(56 S. Brookside Rd.
Springfield, Pa.)

YES

Robert N. C. Nix
Room 2201
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(2139 N. 22nd Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

Edward G. Biester, Jr.
Room 17IT
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(Mountain Rd.
Furlong, Pa.)

NO

James A. Byrne
Room 2^12
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(2315 E. Cumberland Street
Philadelphia, Pa.

G. Robert Watkins
Room IOI5
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(Oakland Road, R. D. 5
West Chester, Pa.)

YES

Joshua D. Eilberg
Room 1130
Longvorth House Office Bldg.
(1522 Longshore Street
Philadelphia, Pa.)

Joseph M. McDade
Room 1131
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(16 U5 N. Washington Avenue
Scranton, Pa.)

YES

Daniel J. Flood
Room 108
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(U60 N. Pennsylvania Ave.
Wilker.-Barre, Pa.)

HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES




- 2 ~

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - Continued

YES

J. Irving Whalley
Room 1235
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(1309 Park Avenue
Windber, Pa. - near Altoona)

YES

Richard S. Schveiker
Room ^08
Cannon House Office Bldg.
(Skippack Pike
Worcester, Pa. - Montgomery Co.)

YES

Fred B. Rooney
Room 1511
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(326 Wyandotte Street
Bethlehem, Pa.)

YES

Edwin D. Eshleman
Room IOO9
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(2820 Spring Valley Rd.
Lancaster, Pa.)

YES

Herman T. Schneebeli
Room llll+
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(870 Hollywood Circle
Willi amsport t Pa.)

YES

George A. Goodling
Room 171^
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(Loganville, Pa.)

YES

John P. Saylor
Room 235^
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
(1*11 Orchard Street
Johnstown, Pa.)




YES

Albert W. Johnson
Room lU32
Longworth House Office Bldg.
(U09 Franklin Street
Smethport, Pa.)