View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FINANCIAL MOBILIZATION
by
KARL R. BOPP
Vice President
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
before the
ANNUAL MEETING, GROUP VI, P. B. A.
Jaffa Mosque, Altoona, Pa.
February 12, 1951

THE PROBLEM:

GREAT EXPANSION OF DEFENSE EFFORT

Contrast with last large defense effort a decade ago
A,

Differences between 1941 and 1951
1.

B.




Size and duration of the effort
a.

11,6 million men vs. 3-| million

b.

40 per cent vs. 16 per cent of GNP

2.

Status of the Economy

3*

Psychology of deflation/inflation

4«

Experience with direct controls
Difficult to administer
At best they postpone - do not solve - inflation

The Economics of Defense
1.

2.

The burden arises from decision to defend
NOT from the need to raise the money

Government: Defense incl* foreign aid

Fiscal
1950
1952
17.6 - V 34-^51.3

Expansion of capacity (investment)
Consumption - especially of durables - must go down
- it doesn1t make any difference how much
money we have I The goods will not be available1
.

-

II.

2

-

FINANCIAL MOBILIZATION

A*

Current income = current output
BUT

current expenditures are not limited by current income

1.

Can

2.

Can borrow and spend future income

T

by spending past savings

If some segments spend
Income
other segments must SAVE (spend < Income)
B.

An Economists’ Program
(Quote p. 54)

"Faced with this long-run inflationary prospect, we recom­
mend that the increase in total spending be continuously curbed in three
principal ways, and that these constitute the first line of defense against
inflation:
1*

Scrutinize carefully all Government expenditures and postpone or
eliminate those that are not urgent and essential. Substantial re­
ductions can be achieved only if some programs are cut.

2.

Raise tax revenues even faster than defense spending grows so as
to achieve and maintain a cash surplus* Merely to balance the
budget is not enough. If the inflationary pressure is to be re­
moved, taxes must take out of private money incomes not only as
much as Government spending contributes to them but also a part
of the increase of private incomes resulting from increased private
spending of idle balances and newly borrowed money, larger taxes
must be paid by all of us. Reliance should be placed primarily on
increases of personal income taxes on all income in excess of
present exemptions. Higher corporate profits taxes, in one form
or another, are also imperative. In addition, loopholes in our
tax laws should be closed.

3.

Restrict the amount of credit available to businesses and individuals
for purposes not essential to the defense program. An expanding
supply of low-cost credit which swells private spending cannot fail
to stimulate inflation when the supply of goods available for pri­
vate use will be difficult to expand and may even decline.

Selective controls over consumer credit, real-estate credit, and loans on
securities are useful for this purpose and should be employed. But we
believe that general restriction of the total supply of credit is also
necessary. This can be accomplished only by measures that will involve
some rise of interest rates.
If general inflationary pressure is not removed by fiscal and credit
measures, we face two alternatives: (1) Continued price inflation, or
(2) a harness of direct controls over the entire economy which, even if
successful in holding down prices and wages for a while, would build up
a huge inflationary potential in the form of idle cash balances, Govern­
ment bonds, and other additions to liquidity. Such accumulated savings
would undermine the effectiveness of direct controls and produce open
inflation when the direct controls are lifted. Everyone remembers vividly

http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
the sharp inflation of 1946-4# when the wartime accumulation of liquid
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

-

3 -

assets went to work on prices after the removal of direct price and
wage controls* either of these alternatives is extremely dangerous."

Variety of economists signing: Not necessarily correct but
evidence of error should be clear and overwhelming.
I haven't seen such evidence yet*
C.

These are difficult times




This is Lincoln's birthday
Lincoln - Second Inaugural Address - 1865
"With malice toward none, with charity for all, with
firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right,
let us strive on to finish the work we are in ..."

01' Mose
"Mose, you better be careful; you may be handing
an innocent man!"

I spent 3 days in Washingtcn last week. I can confirm
your impression that it is a place where sound travels
faster than light.
Reported in press
Everyone wants to get into act.