View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE
AND THE BUSINESS OUTLOOK

REMARKS OF
JOHN J. BALLES, PRESIDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO

MEETING WITH
SALT LAKE CITY
COMMUNITY LEADERS

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
NOVEMBER 3, 1983

-

1
-

INTRODUCTIQN
The

U,S,

economy went through some pretty wrenching times in the

LAST FEW YEARS.

STILL, A REVIEW OF THE RECENT BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL

NEWS SUGGESTS THAT WE'VE ACCOMPLISHED A GREAT DEAL LATELY IN CLEARING
THE ECONOMIC LANDSCAPE OF ONE OF OUR MOST SERIOUS PROBLEMS "INFLATION
—

ALTHOUGH OF COURSE THE JOB IS FAR FROM FINISHED,

SPECIFICALLY, OUR

POLICY ACTIONS HAVE CUT THE RATE OF INFLATION IN HALF SINCE

1981,

AND

IN THE PROCESS ESTABLISHED THE BASE FOR A S U B S T A N T I A BUSINESS
RECOVERY.

YET UNEMPLOYMENT AND FINANCIAL PROBLEMS CONTINUE TO PLAGUE

THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMIES, WHILE THE !:*NA'vJ!:\'3 OF A MASSIVE FEDERAL
DEFICIT HAMPERS OUR TWO-FOLD TASK OF FOSTERING THE RECOVERY AND
CURBING A RESURGENCE OF INFLATION.

Strengths and weaknesses
Reduced inflation represents our

strongest

Indeed, it is a remarkable achievement in

light

recent

*

vement.

of wha'i *cnt before —

that is, a seemingly unstoppable price spiral that badly undermined
THE ECONOMY THROUGHOUT THE PAST DECADE. LAST YEAR, FOR EXAMPLE, THE
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX AND THE WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX FOR FINISHED GOODS
ROSE BY ABOUT

4

PERCENT AND

3.5

PERCENT, RESPECTIVELY (YEAR OVER

YEAR), OR LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THEIR RATES OF INCREASE IN
THE FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF THIS YEAR THE

CPI

ROSE AT A

4,1

1980.

DURING

PERCENT

ANNUAL RATE, WHILE THE WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX HAS ACTUALLY FALLEN AT AN
ANNUAL RATE OF NEARLY ONE PERCENT FROM DECEMBER TO AUGUST,
AS THE INFLATION NUMBERS CONTINUE TO BRING GOOD NEWS, ATTENTION
IS BEING INCREASINGLY FOCUSED ON THE ECONOMY'S ABILITY TO SUSTAIN THE
ECONOMIC EXPANSION THAT BEGAN AT THE END OF LAST YEAR.




THE INDEX OF

"

2

"

LEADING ECONOMIC INDICATORS HAS BEEN MOVING UPWARD SINCE SEPTEMBER

1982,

and since January has scored a very

IMPRESSIVE GAIN OF
GROWTH AT

9,7

9.0

PERCENT,

GNP

BUTTRESSING THAT EVIDENCE, REAL

PERCENT IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THIS YEAR IS THE

STRONGEST IT HAS BEEN IN OVER TWO YEARS/ AND ESTIMATES FOR
THE THIRD OIARTER INDICATE

GNP

CONTINUES TO EXPAND AT A HEALTHY

7,9

PERCENT RATE, ALSO, THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE HAS DROPPED OUT OF DOUBLE-DIGIT
TERRITORY TO
ALMOST

9,3

PERCENT IN SEPTEMBER/ AS EMPLOYMENT INCREASED BY

2k MILLION BETWEEN MAY AND SEPTEMBER,

THE SCATTERED SIGNS OF WEAKNESS THAT SHOWED UP IN AUGUST APPEAR
TO BE DISAPPEARING AS THE SEPTEMBER NUMBERS COME IN,

THUS THE FALL-

OFF in A u g u s t a u t o s a l e s r e v e r s e d i t s e l f in S e p t e m b e r , s u g g e s t i n g t h a t
the

Au g u s t w e a k n e s s w a s c a u s e d by dea l e r s h o r t a g e s of ca r s ra t h e r t h a n

ANY RELUCTANCE ON THE PART OF THE AMERICAN CAR-BUYING PUBLIC,
S i m i l a r l y , p e r s o n a l i n c o m e g r o w t h b e g a n t o p i c k u p s t e a m a g a i n in
S e p t e m b e r l e a d i n g m a n y o b s e r v e r s t o a t t r i b u t e t h e A u g u s t s l o w - d o w n in
THIS KEY STATISTIC TO THE TELEPHONE WORKERS STRIKE,

AND AS INCOMES

HAVE REBOUNDED, SO HAVE RETAIL SALES, WHICH GREW 1,5 PERCENT IN
September after falling

1,6

percent in August,

T h u s it s e e m s c l e a r t h a t t h e c u r r e n t e c o n o m i c e x p a n s i o n is
continuing,

T h e IMPORTANT QUESTION a t t h i s p o i n t , h o w e v e r , is w h a t

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS MIGHT LIE AHEAD,

To

MY MIND, THERE ARE THREE,

F i r s t , is t h e r e a r i s k o f i n f l a t i o n r e - a c c e l e r a t i n g a s t h e e c o n o m y
CONTINUES TO EXPAND?

SECOND, DO HIGH INTEREST RATES RAISE THE

POSSIBILITY OF RECESSION NEXT YEAR?

AflD THIRD, DOES THE PROSPECT OF

LARGE GOVERNMENT DEFICITS THREATEN TO DISTORT THE RECOVERY?




I WILL

RETURN TO THESE POINTS AFTER DISCUSSING WHAT I THINK ARE THE MOST

U.S.

LIKELY OUTLOOKS FOR THE

1983

and

1984

AND HAWAIIAN ECONOMIES.

Outlook for nation

At our Bank, we expect real GNP for the U.S. as a whole could
grow close to
about

5.0

6.0

percent in

om_y modestly in

1983

percent during

1984. Plant

1983,

and should continue to expand at

and equipment spending has grown

because of the current high levels of excess

PLANT CAPACITY; AND NET EXPORTS HAVE ACTUALLY d e c l i n e d , o w i n g t o a
s t r o n g e x c h a n g e v a l u e of the d o l l a r .
has been the real leader
recovery.

In c o n t r a s t , c o n s u m e r s p e n d i n g

in p r o m o t i n g a n d s u s t a i n i n g t h e c u r r e n t

T h i s s t r e n g t h in c o n s u m e r s p e n d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e s u b s t a n t i a l

improvement

in r e a l c o n s u m e r

dramatically, last

incomes and w e a l t h , as

inflation slowed

J u l y 's t a x c u t s t o o k e f f e c t , a n d t h e s p a r k l i n g

s t o c k m a r k e t r a l l y b o o s t e d t h e v a l u e o f h o u s e h o l d 's p o r t f o l i o s .

Consumer spending grew at a robust
of

1983.

6.4

W e expect this growth to slow to a

last half of

1983

percent in the first half

3.5

percent rate over the

and continue at this more moderate pace in

1984,

as

households turn their attention to restoring their savings patterns to
MORE TRADITIONAL LEVELS.

In THE SECOND QUARTER OF THIS YEAR, THE

PERSONAL SAVINGS RATE FELL TO
RECORDED.

4

PERCENT, ITS LOWEST LEVEL EVER

VIE ANTICIPATE HOUSEHOLDS WILL NCW BEGIN TO REBUILD THIS

RATIO BY PULLING BACK SOMEWHAT ON THE RATE AT WHICH THEY SPEND.
S i m i l a r l y , t h e s u r g e in i n v e n t o r y i n v e s t m e n t w e h a v e e x p e r i e n c e d
RECENTLY WILL NOT CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THE SAME SPUR TO THE GROWTH OF
OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT IN

1982




1984

THAT IT DID THIS YEAR. At THE END OF

BUSINESSES WERE RUNNING OFF INVENTORIES, CAUSING REAL

GNP

GROWTH

TO BE DEPRESSED,

In CONTRAST, BY THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1983, THEY WERE

ESTIMATED TO BE ADDING SIGNIFICANTLY TO THEIR INVENTORIES, WHICH TENDED
TO RAISE REAL

GNP

GROWTH.

THIS TURN-AROUND IN INVENTORIES IS

ESTIMATED TO ACCOUNT FOR NEARLY HALF OF THE GROWTH OF
REAL

GNP

SINCE THE RECOVERY BEGAN,

In 1984,

HOWEVER, INVENTORY

INVESTMENT WILL NOT GROW BY NEARLY AS MUCH, SIMPLY BEACUSE INVENTORY"
SALES RATIOS ARE NCW REASONABLY COMFORTABLE,
D e s p i t e m o r e m o d e r a t e g r o w t h in p e r s o n a l c o n s u m p t i o n e x p e n d i t u r e s
AND INVENTORY ACCUMULATION, WE EXPECT OVERALL. GROWTH OF THE ECONOMY IN
1984 TO BE NEARLY AS STRONG AS IN 1983,

BUSINESS SPENDING ON PLANT

AND EQUIPMENT, SPENDING BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND A MODEST
REBOUND IN NET EXPORTS ARE LIKELY TO LEAD THE WAY,

ALTHOUGH THE RATE

OF CAPACITY UTILIZATION IS STIU. RELATIVELY LOW, BUSINESS EXPENDITURES
TO INSTALL MORE EFFICIENT AND MODERN EQUIPMENT ARE ALREADY niJITE
STRONG, PARTLY AS A CONSEOIENCE OF THE TAX INCENTIVES IN THE ECONOMIC
Recovery Tax A c t o f 1981,

A l s o , as e c o n o m i c recovery g a i n s m o m e n t u m

ABROAD, OUR FOREIGN TRADE PICTURE SHOULD IMPROVE SOMEWHAT, EVEN THOUGH
THESE GAINS WILL BE LIMITED BY THE CONTINUED STRENGTH IN THE
INTERNATIONAL VALUE OF THE DOLLAR.

ALL IN ALL, WE CAN EXPECT THE

CONTINUATION OF SOLID GROWTH FOR THE REST OF THE YEAR AND NEXT YEAR,
BUT CERTAINLY NO BOOM,
U t a h Sc e n e
Let m e t u r n n e x t t o th e U t a h s c e n e , T he Ut a h e c o n o m y has b e e n
SHOWING SIGNS OF MODEST OVERALL IMPROVEMENT SINCE LAST SPRING,
C o n t i n u e d l a y o f f s in t h e i m p o r t a n t m e t a l , a n d e n e r g y m i n i n g a n d




-

5

-

PROCESSING/ INDUSTRIES EARLIER IN THE YEAR TENDED TO DELAY THE
RECOVERY/ AS DID THE DISLOCATIONS CAUSED BY THE FLOODS LAST SPRING,
M o s t o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s o f a r h a s b e e n c e n t e r e d in r e s i d e n t i a l
AND NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND IN THE DEMAND FOR HIGH
TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS FOR DEFENSE AND SPACE PURPOSES,

LlKE

THE REST OF THE NATION/ THE DROP IN MORTGAGE INTEREST RATES HAS
SPURRED HOMEBUILDING AND SALES IN THE STATE, WHILE HIGHWAY AND POWER
PLANT CONSTRUCTION HAS HELPED TO BOOST NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
EXPENDITURES AND EMPLOYMENT,

UTAH'S AIRCRAFT/ MISSILES/ AND SPACE

INDUSTRIES ALSO HAVE BEEN BENEFITING FROM A SHARP INCREASE IN DEFENSE
SPENDING.
D e s p i t e t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s / U t a h 's o v e r a l l g r o w t h is l i k e l y t o b e
MODEST THIS YEAR AND INTO

1984.

MORE BUOYANT GROWTH WOULD REQUIRE A

SIGNIFICANT PICKUP IN ITS METAL AND ENERGY MINING OPERATIONS, AND THE
PROSPECT FOR THAT HAPPENING IS NOT ENCOURAGING.

U.S. AUTO, HOUSING

AND APPLIANCE INDUSTRIES HAVE BEEN INCREASING THEIR CONSUMPTION OF
METALS BUT THIS HAS BEEN OFFSET BY BOOSTS IN FOREIGN PRODUCTION, SO
THAT PRODUCER INVENTORIES ARE STILL EXCESSIVE AND PRICES REMAIN
DEPRESSED,

SIMILARLY, UTAH'S COAL PRODUCERS PROBABLY WILL CONTINUE TO

OPERATE IN AN ATMOSPHERE OF ABUNDANT WORLDWIDE ENERGY SUPPLIES AND
RELATIVELY LOW PRICES, WHILE URANIUM MINING WILL REMAIN DEPRESSED AS A
RESULT OF THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION,
R e l a t i v e l y l o w a c t i v i t y in t h e s e i n d u s t r i e s in t u r n h o l d s d o w n t h e
demand for mining equipment and related supplies manufactured

in

Ut a h ,

P r o s p e c t s a r e s o m e w h a t b r i g h t e r in a g r i c u l t u r e / w h e r e U t a h g r a i n
p r o d u c e r s are l i k e l y to earn mo r e b e c a u s e of h i g h e r p r i c e s c a u s e d




BY

-

t h i s y e a r 's

6

-

M idwestern d r o u g h t . But these same h ig h grain pr ices w i l l

RAISE LIVESTOCK FEED COSTS AND MAY FORCE SOME REDUCTION OF UTAH HERDS
AT BELOW BREAK-EVEN PRICES,
Homebuilding -- an activity that has contributed greatly to
Utah's and the nation's economic recovery this year —
provide less stimulus in 1984,

is likely to

Given the huge increase in sousing

starts already achieved this year, housing starts in Utah may be up a
smaller percentage next year —

and that gain will be dependent upon a

decline in mortgage interest rates,

Concern over the current and

FUTURE STATE OF INTEREST RATES IS ONE OF THE TOPICS I WANT TO TURN TO
NEXT,
In f l a t i o n r i s k
D e s p i t e a l l t h e p l u s s i g n s in t h e o u t l o o k , s e r i o u s c o n c e r n s
REMAIN, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER,

THERE IS THE CONCERN WHETHER

INFLATION WILL PICK UP IN 1984,

TYPICALLY, INFLATION DOES NOT BEGIN

TO RISE UNTIL AT LEAST A YEAR AFTER A BUSINESS CYCLE UPTURN,

VJITH THE

RECOVERY NEARLY A YEAR OLD THIS WOULD ARGUE FOR A REBOUND IN INFLATION
NEXT YEAR,

THE STANDARD EXPLANATION FOR THE CYCLICAL UPTURN IN

INFLATION POINTS TO EXPANSIONARY MACROECONOMIC POLICY AS THE
FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE,

THUS A MORE STIMULATORY POLICY FIRST INCREASES

OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT, AND THEN SHOWS UP LATER —

WITH A LAG IN OTHER

WORDS ” IN HIGHER PRICES,
VIITH THIS BACKGROUND IN MIND, SOME COMMENTATORS HAVE ARGUED THAT
THE FED HAS ALREADY LET THE INFLATIONARY CAT OUT OF THE BAG,

THUS FOR

THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING AUGUST OF 1983, THE Ml DEFINITION OF THE
MONEY SUPPLY, WHICH IS COMPOSED OF CURRENCY AND ALL CHECKABLE




-

DEPOSITS/ GREW AT A

12,7

7

-

ANNUAL RATE, THE HIGHEST SUSTAINED MONETARY

expansion since World W a r II,

The critical question

is

whether this

FORETELLS A DRAMATIC RISE IN INFLATION SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE.

IN MY OPINION IT DOES NOT/ BECAUSE MUCH OF THE OBSERVED HIGH
MONEY GROWTH/ AT LEAST IN LATE 1982 AND THE FIRST PART OF 1983/
WAS MATCHED BY AN INCREASE IN MONEY DEMAND.
LET ME EXPLAIN THIS POINT IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL BECAUSE
IT IS NOT WIDELY UNDERSTOOD OR PROPERLY APPRECIATED,

I THINK

In 1982 THERE

WAS A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE PUBLIC'S DESIRE TO HOLD ( RATHER THAN
TO SPEND) LARGER MONEY BALANCES.

THERE IS SOME DEBATE AMONG

ECONOMISTS AS TO WHY THIS OCCURRED.

SOME WOULD ARGUE THAT THE

INCREASED UNCERTAINTIES ASSOCIATED WITH HISTORIC HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT
INCREASED THE PRECAUTIONARY BALANCES THAT PEOPLE WISHED TO HOLD,
O t h e r s w o u l d a r g u e t h a t t h e d e c l i n e in i n t e r e s t r a t e s h a s m a d e it m o r e
ATTRACTIVE TO HOLD MONEY RELATIVE TO OTHER ASSETS
AND MY STAFF HAVE ARGUED STRONGLY FOR,
DESIRE TO HOLD

Ml

—

A VIEW WHICH I

I n ANY EVENT/ THE PUBLIC'S

INCREASED DRAMATICALLY IN

1982. As

A RESULT/ THE

RATIO OF INCOME TO MONEY “ IN OTHER WORDS/ THE VELOCITY OF MONEY —
FELL SIGNIFICANTLY IN

1982.

With the same amount of money doing less work than before, the
Federal Reserve had to supply more ojring 1982 than it originally
INTENDED IN ORDER TO AVOID BEING MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN WAS DESIRABLE
OR NECESSARY.

THUS, RATHER THAN FORCE

SPECIFIED RANGE OF
PERENT IN 1982.

Ml

TO GROW IN THE ORIGINALLY-

2% TO 5 PERCENT, THE FED ALLOWED IT TO GROW 8^

The DECISION TO DO THIS WAS A JUDGMENT CALL THAT WAS

RATIFIED BY THE VERY POSITIVE RESPONSE OF THE FINANCIAL MARKETS AS




SHOWN BY THE DECLINE IN LONG-TERM INTEREST RATES AND THE RISE IN STOCK
PRICES IN THE LATTER HALF OF
WITHIN THE ORIGINAL

2k

TO

1982, I n

MY JUDGMENT, FORCING

PERCENT RANGE IN

1982

Ml

TO STAY

WOULD HAVE RISKED

DOING DAMAGE TO AN ALREADY WEAKENED ECONOMY AND PRECLUDED THE ECONOMIC
RECOVERY WHICH BEGAN AT THE TURN OF THIS YEAR,
IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS DOWNWARD ADJUSTMENT OF
VELOCITY TO LOWER INFLATION RATE IS A ONE~TIME PHENOMENON. ONCE THE
ADJUSTMENT IS COMPLETE

MONEY GROWTH SHOULD BE MADE TO RETURN TO RATES

THAT ALLOW US TO CONTINUE TO MAKE PROGRESS AGAINST INFLATION,

As

Chairman Volcker noted in his midyear monetary policy report to the
Congress in July, the decline in velocity appeared to have largely
abated by the end of the first ^jarter of 1983, suggesting that the
adjustment of money demand to lower inflation WAS more or less
complete by then.

I n recognition of this, the FOMC decided to

ESTABLISH A NEW BASE FOR THE
fourth quarter of

1982

[11

GROWTH RANGE, MOVING IT FROM THE

to the second quarter of

1983, As

Chairman

V o l c k e r NOTED, THIS REBENCHMARKING "REFLECTED A JUDGMENT THAT THE
RAPID GROWTH ( IN Ml) OVER THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS SHOULD BE TREATED
AS A ONE-TIME PHENOMENON, NEITHER TO BE RETRACED OR LONG EXTENDED,"
E a r l i e r t h i s y e a r , I h a d a r g u e d t h a t if m o n e y g r o w t h d i d n o t
APPEAR TO BE SLOWING DOWN AFTER THE FIRST QUARTER, THE FEDERAL RESERVE
SHOULD TAKE STEPS TO ASSURE THAT IT DID, EVEN IF THAT MEANT SOME
MODERATE INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES,

By THE LATTER PART OF THE SECOND

QUARTER, MONEY AND CREDIT WERE SHOWING TENDENCIES TO INCREASE MORE
RAPIDLY THAN SEEMED CONSISTENT WITH LONG-TERM PROGRESS AGAINST
INFLATION AND SUSTAINED ORDERLY RECOVERY,




AGAINST THIS BACKGROUND,

-

the

FOMC

in

9

-

Ma y b e g a n t o t a k e a l e s s a c c o m m o d a t i n g m o n e t a r y p o s t u r e ,

Th e s e s t e p s w e r e a c c o m p a n i e d b y i n t e r e s t r ate i n c r e a s e s r a n g i n g f r o m

3/4

to

1

percent or m o r e ,

But as

I

had argued e a r l i e r , the prospects

FOR SUSTAINED GROWTH AND ULTIMATELY LCWER INTEREST RATES OVER TIME
WOULD BE ENHANCED BY TIMELY ACTION TO RESTRAIN EXCESSIVE GROWTH IN
MONEY/ GIVEN ITS INFLATIONARY POTENTIAL,
T h e EVENTS OF THE PAST FEW MONTHS TO MY MIND HAVE OM_Y SERVED TO
CONFIRM THIS JUDGMENT, SlNCE MARCH, Ml GROWTH HAS AVERAGED
AT AN ANNUAL RATE, COMPARED TO A
PRECEDING.

l4,9

7.9

PERCENT

PERCENT RATE IN THE SIX MONTHS

AS A RESULT/ FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE lQol,

FELL WITHIN ITS LONGER-RUN MONITORING RANGE SET BY THE

f'il

FOMC.

F inancial m arkets appear to have been heartened by these d e v e l o p m e n t s ,
S i n c e A u g u s t , s h o r t -t e r m i n t e r e s t r a t e s h a v e t e n d e d t o f a l l a s t h e
market perceives that the

Federal Reserve has more room to m an eu ve r

WITH MONEY NOW ON TARGET,

A t THE SAME TIME, HEIGHTENED INVESTOR

CONFIDENCE THAT THE FED WILL NOT GIVE UP ON THE FIGHT AGAINST
INFLATION HAS PULLED DOWN LONG-TERM YIELDS AS WELL,

LET ME NOTE HERE

THAT IT REMAINS THE INTENTION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO MAKE FURTHER
INROADS AGAINST INFLATION,

CHAIRMAN VOLCKER MADE THIS VERY CLEAR IN

HIS SPEECH TO THE AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION HERE IN HONOLULU A
COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, AND I CAN OM_Y REAFFIRM OUR COMMITMENT TO THIS
GOAL,
H i g h In t e r e s t R a t e S y n d r o m e
D e s p i t e r e c e n t d e c l i n e s in n o m i n a l , o r m a r k e t , i n t e r e s t r a t e s ,
YIELDS IN a VERY IMPORTANT SENSE RE,MAIN DISTURBINGLY HIGH,

I REFER TO

REAL INTEREST RATES “ INTEREST RATES WITH THE MARKET PREMIUM FOR




-

INFLATION TAKEN OUT OF THEM,

10
-

THESE REAL RATES MEASURE THE TRUE

BORROWING COST FOR HOUSEHOLDS AND FIRMS, AND THEY REMAIN HIGH BY
HISTORICAL STANDARDS, ESPECIALLY FOR THIS STAGE OF THE BUSINESS CYCLE,
T h e IMPLICATIONS OF THESE HIGH RE/I. RATES ARE NOT CONFINED TO
THEIR DIRECT EFFECTS ON BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SPENDING,

HlGH REAL

INTEREST RATES ATTRACT MASSIVE FUNDS FROM ABROAD, CAUSING THE DOLLAR
TO BE OVERVALUED,

THE RECENT INCREASE IN THE DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE,

FOR EXAMPLE, HAS PUSHED THE DOLLAR'S INTERNATIONAL VALUE ABOVE THE
RECORD LEVEL OF NOVEMBER 1982,

An OVER-VALUED DOLLAR MEANS THAT

IMPORTS ARE ENCOURAGED AND EXPORTS DISCOURAGED —

WHICH IN TURN MEANS

CONTINUED DISTRESS FOR SUCH BASIC INDUSTRIES AS STEEL, AUTOS, AND OF
COURSE TOURISM.

THUS, THE U.S, TRADE SURPLUS ON GOODS AND SERVICES

FOR THE FIRST HALF OF THIS YEAR HAS DROPPED TO $4,3 BILLION FROM $3l,6
BILLION IN THE SAME PERIOD LAST YEAR,
N o r ARE THE EFFECTS OF AN OVER-VALUED DOLLAR CONFINED TO THE U.S,
T h e CORRESPONDING DETERIORATION IN THE EXCHANGE VALUE OF FOREIGN
CURRENCIES MEANS HIGHER INFLATION FOR THESE COUNTRIES AS THEY FIND THE
COST OF THEIR IMPORTS GOING UP,

THE ALTERNATIVE FOR THESE COUNTRIES

IS TO PROTECT THEIR CURRENCIES BY KEEPING THEIR REAL INTEREST RATES
HIGH,

BUT THAT MEANS DEPRESSED OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT FOR THEM AT

HOME, HARDLY AN ATTRACTIVE ALTERNATIVE,
T h e r e h a s b e e n a g r e a t d e a l of e d i t o r i a l c o m m e n t r e c e n t l y a b o u t
WHETHER THOSE HIGH REAL RATES RISK A RECESSION IN 1984,
F e d e r a l R e s e r v e Ba n k of San F r a n c i s c o

At THE

we have always c a u t i o n e d that

HIGH INTEREST RATES BY THEMSELVES DO NOT FORECAST A RECESSION.

THEY

COULD JUST AS WELL REFLECT A STRONG ECONOMY RATHER THAN A WEAK ONE




-

11
-

T h a t i s , if a s t r o n g e c o n o m y i n c r e a s e s t h e d e m a n d f o r c r e d i t , l e a d i n g
to high

interest r a t e s , that will not by

recovery,

i t s e l f s h o r t -c i r c u i t

the

O m _y if t h e h i g h i n t e r e s t r a t e s a r e d u e t o a s h o r t a g e o f

THE SUPPLY OF CREDIT WOULD THEY INDICATE THAT THE RECOVERY MIGHT BE IN
TROUBLE,

W E DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE

SECOND HALF OF

1983.

Th e r e are a n u m b e r of r e a s o n s for o u r h o l d i n g t h i s p o s i t i o n .
F i r s t , t h e h i g h l e v e l s o f r e a l i n t e r e s t r a t e s w e 'v e h a d f o r t h e l a s t
YEAR HAVE NOT PREVENTED A TYPICAL BUSINESS CYCLE EXPANSION FROM
OCCURRING,

T h a t SUGGESTS THAT THE h i g h r a t e s ARE d j e m o r e t o a n

INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR CREDIT THAN TO A RESTRICTION IN SUPPLY,
S e c o n d , one does not have to look very far for one o bviou s source of
STRONG CREDIT DEMAND —
MASSIVE DEFICITS.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S NEED TO FINANCE ITS

THUS THE TREASURY WAS IN THE MARKET FOR ABOUT $44

BILLION IN THE THIRD QUARTER, AND FOURTH QUARTER FINANCIAL
REQUIREMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE $45 BILLION.

FOR 1983 AS A WHOLE, THE

UNIFIED BUDGET DEFICIT CURRENTLY IS PROJECTED TO BE $207 BILLION AND ONLY
SLIGHTLY LOWER -

$183 BILLION —

IN 1984,

FINALLY, THE TOTAL SUPPLY

OF CREDIT HAS INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE UNITED STATES IN THE LAST
YEAR, FROM ABOUT 11 PERCENT OF GNP IN MID~1982 TO 18 PERCENT IN MID~

1983, On

BALANCE, THEREFORE, IT WOULD SEEM HIGH REAL INTEREST RATES

REFLECT STRONG CREDIT DEMAND, NOT WEAK CREDIT SUPPLY,
D e f i c i t s a n d Ec o n o m i c D i s t o r t i o n s
As I o u t l i n e d e a r l i e r , t h e c u r r e n t b u s i n e s s c y c l e e x p a n s i o n is
LED BY A LARGE INCREASE IN CONSUMER SPENDING, FOLLOWED BY A SMALL
INCREASE IN INVESTMENT SPENDING, AND A DECLINE IN NET EXPORTS,




THIS

-

represents

12
-

A DISTORTED BUSINESS CYCLE SITUATION COMPARED TO THE

TYPICAL RECOVERY OF THE PAST, IN WHICH THERE WAS A MUCH MORE BALANCED
GROWTH OF CONSUMPTION, INVESTMENT AND EXPORTS,

CONCERNS THAT THE

CURRENT DISTORTED PATTERN WILL HURT THE ECONOMY ARE

IN MY OPINION,

WELL TAKEN,
T h i s r e c o v e r y is j u s t t h e o p p o s i t e o f t h e s u p p l y - s i d e e c o n o m i s t s '
EXPECTATIONS THAT THE REAGAN TAX CUTS WOULD LEAD TO AN INVESTMENT-LED
RECOVERY,

High REAL INTEREST RATES HAVE MORE THAN OFFSET THE STIMULUS

OF LOWER TAXES ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT,

THE REASON FOR THIS DISTORTION

IS nUITE EASY TO SEE,

UNDER THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT

SPENDING AS A SHARE OF

6NP

TO

25

PERCENT OF

GNP,

HAS GONE UP

2

PERCENTAGE POINTS —

FROM

23

THAT ADDITIONAL ABSORPTION OF RESOURCES BY

GOVERNMENT MEANS THAT PRIVATE DEMANDS MUST BE REDUCED AN EQUAL AMOUNT,

I n OTHER WORDS, SOME FORM OF PRIVATE SPENDING HAS TO BE "CROWDED OUT"
BY THE INCREASED DEMANDS OF GOVERNMENT, THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THREE
DIFFERENT WAYS —

BY RAISING TAX RATES, BY INCREASING THE INFLATION

RATE, OR BY RAISING REAL INTEREST RATES, A RISE IN TAXES WOULD CROWD
OUT THE SPENDING OF THOSE WHO BEAR THE BURDEN OF THE TAX,

A RISE IN

THE INFLATION RATE WOULD CROWD OUT THOSE WHOSE INCOME GROWS MORE
SLOWLY THAN INFLATION.

AND A RISE IN REAL INTEREST RATES WOULD CROWD

OUT THE INTEREST-SENSITIVE SPENDING, WHICH IS LARGELY FOCUSED ON
INVESTMENT, HOUSING AND EXPORTS,
The Reagan a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a p p e a r s a d a m a n t l y o p p o s e d to tax h i k e s ,
AND IN ANY EVENT IT IS UNLIKELY CONGRESS WILL BE IN THE MOOD TO RAISE
TAXES AS THE

1984

ELECTION NEARS,

As I

INDICATED EARLIER, THE FEDERAL

R e s e r v e r e m a i n s r e s o l u t e in i t s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t o c u t i n f l a t i o n




-

13
-

FURTHER, AND AS CHAIRMAN VOLCKER INDICATED IN RECENT TESTIMONY TO
C o n g r e s s , b e l i e v e s it is u n w i s e t o f i n a n c e b u d g e t d e f i c i t s t h r o u g h
MONETARY EXPANSION.

ALL OF THIS MEANS THAT HIGHER GOVERNMENT SPENDING

HAS BEEN FINANCED BY BORROWING IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS, RESULTING IN
A RISE IN REAL INTEREST RATES,

As A RESULT

ALL OF THE CROWDING OUT

CAUSED BY INCREASED GOVERNMENT SPENDING HAS BEEN DIRECTED ONTO
INTEREST-SENSITIVE AND EXPORT-SENSITIVE INDUSTRIES, WHICH REPRESENT
OUR INDUSTRIES WITH THE GREATEST COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE, AND OUR FUTURE
SOURCES OF GROWTH.

THE DISTORTED RECOVERY THEREFORE THREATENS THE

GROWTH IN THE STANDARD OF LIVING AND THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE U S.
ECONOMY.

IN MY OPINION, THAT IS THE MAJOR RISK IN THE CURRENT

SITUATION “ NOT AN ACCELERATION OF INFLATION, OR A BUSINESS CYCLE
RECESSION IN 1984, BUT THE LONG, SLOW EROSION OF AMERICA'S INDUSTRIAL
BASE,
Co n c l u d i n g R e m a r k s
To SUM UP, WE CAN BE THANKFUL FOR HAVING BROKEN BOTH THE UPWARD
SPIRAL OF INFLATION AND THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL OF RECESSION DURING THE
PAST YEAR.

Much REMAINS TO BE DONE

OF COURSE

We MUST DEAL WITH THE

PROBLEM OF LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT IN ALL. OF OUR BASIC INDUSTRIES,
This c a n b e s t be a c c o m p l i s h e d by havi n g f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s ,
PARTICULARLY LONG-TERM CAPITAL MARKETS, THAT ARE NOT PLAGUED WITH
RENEWED FEARS OF FUTURE INFLATION,

THERE ARE ALSO A NUMBER OF UNUSUAL

INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS CONFRONTING US AS WE PROCEED INTO THE RECOVERY,
T h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t o f t h e s e is t h e s e v e r e f i n a n c i a l d i f f i c u l t i e s s o m e
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ARE EXPERIENCING IN SERVICING THEIR HUGE FOREIGN
DEBT




A CONSIDERABLE PORTION OF WHICH IS OWED TO U,S, BANKS,

-

14
-

It IS d i f f i c i l t t o s e e h o w a b a l a n c e d r e c o v e r y in t h e

U.S.

ECONOMY WILL BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT FURTHER DECLINES IN REAL INTEREST
RATES.

HOWEVER/ THE FEDERAL RESERVE'S POLICY OF PROVIDING ENOUGH

MONEY TO SUSTAIN A NON"INFLATIONARY RECOVERY CANNOT CONTRIBUTE TO
REDUCING REAL INTEREST RATES.

OPLY A DECLINE IN THE FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT'S VORACIOUS DEMAND FOR CREDIT CAN DO THAT.
the

I f CONGRESS AND

Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n f a i l to c u r b e n o r m o u s b u d g e t d e f i c i t s / th e

RESULTING SQEEZE ON CAPITAL INVESTMENT THREATENS TO UNDERMINE OUR
LONG-TERM PROSPECTS FOR REAL GROWTH AND HIGHER STANDARDS OF LIVING.
T h e m a j o r r i s k in t h e c u r r e n t s i t u a t i o n is n o t a n a c c e l e r a t i o n o f
INFLATION OR A BUSINESS CYCLE RECESSION IN 1984/ BUT A LONG/ SLOW
DETERIORATION IN THE ABILITY OF THE
STANDARD OF LIVING FOR ALL OF US.




U.S.

ECONOMY TO DELIVER A RISING