View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Outline for
Jerry Jordan's Remarks to

STARK DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC. BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Stark Technical College
October 13, 1993

I.

OPENING REMARKS
A. Thank speaker for introduction
B. Pleasure to be here, etc.
C. Tell a joke??

II.

INTRODUCTION
A.

B.

Over the past 12 months, nation' has witnessed dramatic
decline in long-term interest rates.
1.

A year ago, the interest rate on 3 0-year Treasury
bonds stood at 7.5%. Now, the rate is under 6%.

2.

Rate on 10-year notes was 7-1/4% a year ago.
the rate is about 5.4%

Now,

Three reasons have been advanced to explain decline:
1.

After more than a decade of working at it, the
Federal Reserve is gradually persuading investors
we are serious about keeping inflation in check,
so inflation premium built into rates is
declining.

2.

Investors believe the fiscal authorities -­
Congress and the White House -- are serious about
long-term deficit reduction, reducing concern
government will attempt to monetize its debt in
the future.

3.

Many believe that the budget package Congress
passed earlier this year will slow economic
expansion, thereby reducing inflationary
pressures.

C.

In other times, such a large drop in the cost of
borrowing might be expected to bring about upsurge in
economic activity.

D.

But despite last year's solid performance, economic
activity in the first half of this year faltered.
This development led some in government, business, and
media to call for Federal Reserve to push interest
rates still lower.
I

2

E.

III.

Most important contribution of the Federal Reserve, or
any other central bank, to the creation and maintenance
of prosperity, is to bring about price stability.
This
morning I'd like to discuss three questions relating to
price stability:
1.

What is it?

2.

Why is it important?

3.

How does the Federal Reserve's charter affect its
ability to bring about price stability?

-

WHAT MONETARY POLICY CANNOT DO
A.

B.

Before answering these questions directly, it might
help to state what monetary policy cannot do:
1.

Increase production of real goods and services.

2.

Permanently lower the unemployment rate.

3.

Create employment.

4.

Peg, or permanently lower, the real interest rate.

For proof of limitations of monetary policy, one need
only look at current state of economy, reasons behind
slow recovery from recession:
1.

Historically high indebtedness of businesses and
consumers, which has made both groups reluctant to
spend.

2.

Overbuilding in commercial real estate market.

3.

Cutbacks in defense spending, resulting from end
of the Cold War, and the political decision to
fund other things.

4.

Budget problems among state and local governments,
resulting in layoffs, tax increases, reductions in
transfer payments.

3

IV.

5.

Contraction of the savings & loan industry,
disrupting many long-standing lending
relationships.

6.

Commercial bank extensions of credit have been
slow, due in part to weak loan demand in some
areas of the country, and in part to banks setting
higher standards of credit worthiness.

7.

Uncertainty over long-term-effects of government's
budget and health care reform packages.

C.

These are structural, or in some cases political,
problems. Debasing the nation's money supply will not
solve them.

D.

Moreover, it's not true to say "there's no harm in
trying."
If the Federal Reserve uses monetary
expansion to attempt to do those things, it can harm
the economy by reigniting inflation. Motto of a
central bank should be, "Do no harm."

E.

Ultimately, it is the private sector which creates jobs
and prosperity.
The role of the Federal Reserve is to
help create an environment in which the private sector
can accomplish these ends. Fed can best do this by
creating price stability.

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY PRICE STABILITY?
A.

It's a term that can mean different things to different
people.
1.

To some, it's a condition of low inflation, where
year-to-year changes in the price level, as
measured by the Consumer Price Index and other
indices, are minimal.
a.

2.

I don't think that's good enough, because
even at what seems like low inflation, the
purchasing power of our currency diminishes
with surprising speed. At an annual
inflation rate of 4%, the price level doubles
in 18 years.

To some, it refers to stability in the aggregate
price level of gopds and services.
a.

That definition is closer to the mark, but I

4

believe it should be expanded to include the
prices of assets.
b.

3.

V.

If our goal is to maintain the purchasing
power of the currency, then the prices of
assets that are important to households and
businesses need to be reflected in
calculations of the price level.

To others it means a target of zero inflation,
that is, a zero percent year-to-year change in the
aggregate price level.
a.

I believe the target should be stability of
the aggregate price level.

b.

Distinction is small, but crucial:
(1)

We might aim for zero inflation, but if
we miss the target, even by a little
each year, over the long run that can
still add up to a significant reduction
in the value of the currency.

(2)

By aiming for stability in the aggregate
price level, we make it clear that, over
time, there will be no cumulation of
errors.
If we do go above the target
price level, our intention to come back
down to that price level is clear.

WHY IS PRICE STABILITY GOAL IMPORTANT?
A.

Without it, inflation is more likely.

B.

How inflation is costly to economy:
1.

Inflation hampers efficiency by distorting price
signals.
a.

When the price of a good or service increases
during inflation, it's not clear how much of
the increase is relative, and how much is due
to the increase in the aggregate price level.

b.

Result is to reduce efficiency of decision­
making by households regarding consumption,
savings, and employment, and of firms
regarding output levels, capital-labor

5
ratios, and material inputs to production
processes.
2.

Uncertainty adds to investment risks, increasing
the risk premiums in interest rates, reducing
investment, and shifting it toward shorter-lived
capital goods and projects with quicker pay-backs.

3.

Inflation interacts with tax code to discourage
savings and investment.

4.

5.

a.

Interest earned on assets is taxed in full,
even though part of the return is merely an
inflation premium.

b.

Business investment is discouraged, because
business profits are overstated, and
therefore overtaxed. The tax code allows
depreciation only with respect to the
purchase price of capital equipment, rather
than the replacement cost.

Unexpected inflation redistributes wealth and
earned income:
a.

Wealth from net creditors to net debtors.

b.

Earned income from those with inflexible wage
contracts to those with ability to raise
wages or prices faster than inflation.

Inflation creates incentives for households and
businesses to use their resources in finding ways
to hedge against inflation, rather than in
productive capacities:
a.

Households hedge against inflation by, for
example, buying houses larger than what they
really need, or purchasing assets such as
gold for which they would otherwise have no
need.

b.

Businesses keep inventories that are larger
than needed for most efficient production,
consultants sell advice for methods of
hedging against inflation, financial
institutions develop tools to be used as
inflation hedges.
i

6

c.

6.

VI.

Result is people and businesses diverting
some of their resources to try to alter
inflation's redistributive effects to their
benefit, rather than adding to the existing
stock of the nation's wealth.

In sum, a policy of price stability would enable
the Federal Reserve to have the maximum positive
impact on the nation's economic well-being.
a.

Businesses could plan for the future without
worrying if inflation will upset their plans.

b.

Efficiency would be increased, as confusion
in price signals is reduced.

c.

Disincentives for savings and investment are
reduced.

d.

Resources once used for hedging against
inflation can be redeployed to other, more
productive uses.

HOW DOES THE FEDERAL RESERVE'S CHARTER AFFECT ITS ABILITY TO
BRING ABOUT PRICE STABILITY?
A.

Although price stability is a noble ideal, the Fed's
charter does not specify a goal of pursuing it
singlemindedly.

B.

Since the Fed's establishment 80 years ago, Congress
has enacted numerous, and sometimes contradictory, laws
designed to give direction to Federal Reserve policies.
Among these have been:
1.

The Employment Act of 1946.

2.

Federal Reserve Reform Act of 1977.

3.

Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978,
more commonly known as the Humphrey-Hawkins A c t .
a.

1977 Reform Act amended Federal Reserve Act
of 1913 so that the Fed now is required "to
promote effectively the goals of maximum
employment, stable prices, and moderate long­
term interest rates."

7

C.

VII.

b.

Many people regard these goals as
contradictory, but properly understood, they
are really the same thing, and are not in
conflict.

c.

In the long run, the only way to ensure
steady growth and maximum employment is
through price stability.

Other nations, including some of our chief competitors,
are aware of the connection between prosperity and
price stability.
1.

In what used to be West Germany, for example, the
central bank had a variety of goals specified by
law, but the law also stated that whenever any of
its goals conflicted, price stability was to be
assigned the highest priority.

2.

Helps to explain why West Germany's price level
rose 135% between 1967 and 1992, versus 308% for
the U.S.

D.

I believe the nation would be better off if we followed
the example of Germany, and made price-level stability
the number one priority of the Federal Reserve.
Furthermore, I believe the Federal Reserve should state
explicitly when it intends to reach that objective, and
should be held accountable if it does not stay on
schedule.

E.

Price-level stability is not only consistent with full
employment, maximum sustainable growth, and low
interest rates, but it makes a significant contribution
to their achievement.
Indeed, it is the most important
contribution the Federal Reserve can make.

CONCLUSION
A.

At beginning of my talk, I said there were three
possible explanations for decline in long-term interest
rates.

B.

In fact, it's probably a combination of them.
I

8

1.

Public starting to believe government is serious
about tackling deficit, although funding of the
President's health care reform package is raising
eyebrows again.

2.

Public is gaining faith in Federal Reserve's
pledge to seek price stability.

3.

"Fiscal drag" effect of budget package.

C.

Result has been lowest interest rates nation has seen
in decades.

D.

I believe this is an excellent time, therefore, to
consolidate these hard-earned gains with a firm and
clear commitment to price stability on the part of the
Federal Reserve.
It is the most important contribution
we can make to the nation's long-term economic well­
being.

E.

Thank you.

Now I'll be happy to take your questions.