The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Search Site Home > Newsroom > St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses Two Monetary Policy Normalization Views 5/26/2016 SINGAPORE – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard discussed “Slow Normalization or No Normalization?” at the O cial Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum’s (OMFIF) City Lecture on Thursday. Bullard noted that recent U.S. monetary policy discussions have been dominated by issues related to the possible pace of increase in the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) policy rate. He discussed two views regarding the expected policy rate path: the FOMC’s scenario and the market-based scenario. “The FOMC has laid out, via the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), a datadependent ‘slow normalization,’ whereby the nominal policy rate would gradually rise over the next several years provided the economy evolves as expected,” he said. “Market-based forecasts of FOMC policy, in contrast, envision ‘almost no normalization,’ whereby the policy rate would be changed only a few times in the next several years.” Bullard brie y compared and contrasted each view, starting rst with the FOMC’s scenario. The FOMC’s Scenario—Slow Normalization He cited three factors in favor of the FOMC’s scenario of a slow normalization of the U.S. policy rate: relatively strong U.S. labor markets, in ation measurements moving closer to the FOMC’s target of 2 percent, and waning international headwinds. Strong U.S. Labor Markets “By nearly any metric, U.S. labor markets are at or beyond full employment,” Bullard said. For example, he noted that job openings per available worker are at a cyclical low, unemployment insurance claims relative to the size of the labor force are at a multidecade low, and nonfarm payroll employment growth has been above longer-run trends. In addition, the level of a labor market conditions index created by staff at the Board of Governors continues to be well above average. “In short, labor markets are relatively tight,” he said. “This may put upward pressure on in ation going forward.” U.S. In ation Closer to Target While in ation has been relatively low in the U.S. during the last several years, Bullard explained that large movements in oil prices have had a major impact on headline For media inquiries contact: Laura Girresch mediainquiries@stls.frb.org O ce: (314) 444-6166 Cell: (314) 348-3639 James Bullard St. Louis Fed President and CEO James Bullard is president and chief executive o cer of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. In these roles, he participates in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and directs the activities of the Federal Reserve’s Eighth District. President's Website Speeches & Presentations Video Appearances Media Interviews Research Papers in ation. “Measures intended to give an indication of in ation movements net of oil price effects have been trending somewhat higher,” he said. Thus, he noted that the FOMC’s projection of a slow rise in U.S. in ation as the effects of a stronger dollar and a decline in oil prices wear off appears to be happening, as indicated by the rise in smoothed measures of in ation over the last year. International Headwinds Waning Bullard then turned to the discussion of the impact of negative global factors on the U.S. economy and how some of these factors appear to be dissipating during the rst half of 2016. “International headwinds affecting the U.S. economy have been widely discussed in global nancial markets during the last several years,” he said. “Recent negative international in uences on the U.S. economy appear to be waning.” He looked at two factors that have been widely cited in the international headwinds discussion: global nancial stress and the negative impact of a stronger dollar on U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth. “Measures of U.S. nancial stress indicate that stress has fallen off its peak earlier this year,” he said. Regarding the second headwind, Bullard noted that the dollar appreciated mostly during the second half of 2014, coinciding with the run-up to the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing program. “This appeared to have had a substantial effect on the net exports contribution to U.S. GDP growth during the winter of 20142015,” he said. “Since then, however, the effects of a stronger dollar appear to be waning.” The Market-Based Scenario—Almost No Normalization Bullard then discussed two factors in favor of the market-based scenario of almost no normalization of the U.S. policy rate: the slow U.S. real GDP growth and low U.S. in ation expectations. U.S. Real GDP Growth Below Trend Bullard noted that real GDP growth has been slower than trend in recent quarters, with rst-quarter real GDP growing at an annual rate of just 0.5 percent, according to the most recent estimate. This estimate may be in uenced by the “residual seasonality” issue, he said, explaining that rst-quarter real GDP has been low since 2009. “Still, combining actual data from the second half of 2015, the rst quarter of 2016, and tracking estimates for the current quarter, the suggestion is that the U.S. is growing below a trend pace of 2 percent,” he said. “The slower, below-trend pace of recent U.S. growth is inconsistent with a slowly rising path for the policy rate,” he explained. U.S. In ation Expectations Still Too Low Looking at market-based measures of U.S. in ation expectations, Bullard noted that while they were relatively satisfactory during the summer of 2014, they fell with oil prices during 2014 and renewed a downward trend beginning in late 2015. “Recently, market-based in ation expectations have recovered somewhat,” he said. “However, expectations remain low compared with the levels observed in the summer of 2014.” He noted that market-based measures of in ation expectations tied to the Treasury In ation-Protected Securities (TIPS) market are based on consumer price index (CPI) in ation, but that the FOMC’s target is based on personal consumption expenditures (PCE) in ation. The latter generally runs about 30 basis points lower. “Current readings on TIPS-based in ation compensation are di cult to reconcile with credible longer-run FOMC policy to maintain an in ation target of 2 percent PCE in ation,” he said. Summary of the Two Views To sum up, the FOMC median projection for the policy rate suggests a gradual pace of rate increases over the next several years, Bullard said. At the same time, the marketbased expectation for the policy rate is much shallower, with only a few increases over the forecast horizon—that is, almost no normalization. “U.S. evidence from labor markets, actual in ation readings and global in uences suggests the FOMC median projection may be more nearly correct,” he said. Meanwhile, “U.S. evidence from recent readings on GDP growth and market-based in ation expectations suggests the market view of the path of the policy rate may be more nearly correct.” GENERAL Home About Us Bank Supervision Careers Community Development Economic Education Events Inside the Economy Museum Newsroom On the Economy Blog Open Vault Blog OUR DISTRICT Little Rock Branch Louisville Branch Memphis Branch Agricultural Finance Monitor Housing Market Conditions SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Bridges Economic Synopses Housing Market Perspectives In the Balance Page One Economics The Quarterly Debt Monitor Review Regional Economist ST. LOUIS FED PRESIDENT James Bullard's Website INITIATIVES Center for Household Financial Stability Dialogue with the Fed Federal Banking Regulations FOMC Speak In Plain English - Making Sense of the Federal Reserve Timely Topics Podcasts and Videos DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES CASSIDI® FRASER® FRED® FRED® Blog GeoFRED® IDEAS FOLLOW THE FED Twitter Facebook YouTube Google Plus Email Subscriptions RSS CONTACT US | LEGAL INFORMATION | PRIVACY NOTICE & POLICY | FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ONLINE
@FedFRASER