View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE OUTREACH OF A UNIVERSITY

Talk by
Hugh D. Galusha, Jr.
President
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

To
Communiversity Conference
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota

September 30, 1967

H. D. Galusha, Jr.

THE OUTREACH OF A UNIVERSITY

Don Smith was not content to rely upon my regard for him nor my
respect for this great University when he asked me to speak today.

The hook

he dangled in front of me was not only baited with a description of an audience
that would excite Monsignor Fulton J. Sheen, but with suggestions of talk titles
to match, like "The Community of Scholars--A Modern Interpretation,11 "Learning
in the Modern World,11 and "The Outreach of a University".
have chosen "The Outreach of a University".

From among these I

It was the word "Outreach" that I

found most appealing-- the breaking away from traditional confines implicit in
the act of reaching out.
To be partially facetious for a moment, I could also add a subtitle
in the tradition of seminar programs generally. "The Outreach of a University-or Who is in the Ivory Tower Now".

Let me give you an example.

Last fall an

ambitious symposium was held to discuss the relationship of morality and business
Apart from the implicit assumption that they might be separable which bothered me
I was particularly disturbed by one speaker.
least one respect.

This man had been fortunate in at

He had succeeded very well in a material way with a business

that had not involved any excursions into scientific fields, nor had it involved
any confrontation with any of the social and economic forces many American
businessmen must accommodate in the pursuit of their occupations.

He was a rare

specimen indeed then, a man who had lived well into middle age, with all the
prejudices of his youth and another era still intact.
Among these was a picture of a college professor carried from this
gentler time.

His college professor lived in the ivy-covered world of the

college campus, totally detached from reality.




Thoughts of money or the world's

- 2 -

commerce seldom entered this professorial mind, and when they did they were to
be exorcised by the academic counterpart of the confessional.

Never a particiĀ­

pant in the economic and political processes of the country, his pallid Mr. Chips
meant well, but after all, if he could do anything, would he be teaching?

With

loving pity, the speaker dwelt upon this poor unfortunate in the ivory tower,
whose rescue he regarded as part of the businessman's burden.
Well, the ivory tower still exists in our society, but the tenant has
changed.

Mr. Chips is now "Dr. Chips,M and if he is not in the chips, he

certainly knows where they are counted.

Not only is he not in the ivory tower,

but he often cannot even be found on the campus; and as for his awareness of
money and the world's commerce, Dr. Chips in pursuit of a grant frequently shows
a knowledge of and a positive talent for the tactics of laissez-faire that would
have embarrassed Jay Gould.
But, while the speaker's academic world never existed in that extreme
form, it cannot be maintained seriously that fundamental changes have not taken
place.

Although there still exists a division between town and gown--a point to

which I will return--the line is faint; by comparison to the division thirty
years ago it is hardly discernible.

So pervasive is the influence of the modern

university, it can be fairly argued there is no element of our society untouched
in some way by a university program.
This has come about in a number of ways, but usually with a single
purpose--to tap the creative energies of the academic community.
will illustrate what I mean.

A few examples

There are few campuses on which some research and

development activity cannot be found.

The concern of federal, state, and now

local governments to stimulate economic progress has been well served by the
enlargement of the body of economic theory by practitioners of that dismal
science lodged mainly at universities.

The business corporation is now well

aware of the pecuniary rewards flowing from special arrangements to tap the




technical competence of academia.

And of course the astonishing leap in the

productivity of American agriculture which has occurred in the past 30 years
would not have been possible without the land grant college programs.
I might add here that sometimes the university succeeds too well,

It

might be argued that the land grant college in bringing about the astonishing
technical progress of United States agriculture unwittingly added the new and
frightening dimensions of the American slum--areas now filled not with emigrants
from other countries, but emigrants from rural America who are no longer needed
in agriculture.
All of this is illustrative of a point frequently made of the complexity
of our society.
The phrase is an unfortunate one to the degree it connotes a machine
composed of a number of interacting parts that by knowing design or otherwise
have definable patterns of interaction.

The connotation of a single identity

of society, however complicated, is inappropriate.

In its place, may I suggest

we consider as a substitute the phrase "the complexity of our social system.1'
A system made up of constituent elements, but a system in which the components
are linked together in a most tenuous way by a balance of tension that is the
only thing they have in common.

Like the solar system, each moves in its own

orbit, with its own pattern of rotation, responding to pressures and tensions
internally created.

There are many examples, but a few will suffice to illustrate

my point.
(a) Suburban communities tend to pursue courses independent of those
followed by the core cities, and both are usually distinct from those of rural
America.

Witness the dislocations of reapportionment and area wide government.
(b) Michael Harrington emphasized the separateness of the economic

worlds within the United States in the title of his book "The Other America'1.
All the efforts to establish patterns of communication between the residents of




- 4 -

this nother America11 and the one we know spring from an awareness in a few
quarters of the disengagement.

But even this is an oversimplification, for of

course there are all kinds of sub-groups within the affluent and the poor that
have only tenuous identification with their larger economic class.

Witness the

problems being encountered by poverty warriors in their attempts to drape massive
federal programs around such diverse frames as the rural poor, the urban poor, the
Puerto Rican, the colored, and many others.
(c)

In an occupational sense, it has long been obvious that each of

us tends to move in a circle subscribed by professional interests and occupational
associations.

At this great University, it is seldom, for example, that at a

party given by one economist one meets representatives from any other department
of the University.

It is axiomatic that only bankers understand other bankers,

but here perhaps it is because no one else would find it worth while, or so our
critics say.

The list could be continued, but the point appears inescapable.

The natural momentum of any particular group in our society is
internally generated and always tends toward greater isolation, not less.

This

does not mean the courses are necessarily divergent--frequently they are parallelbut the rationale of the selected course is internally determined with little
consideration of the relevancy to other social groups.
This is the neutral projection--but it can be altered externally;
sometimes by direct collision with another group with a conflicting path and
sometimes by intervention of an outside agency.

There are very few social

institutions that cut across the lines to provide channels of communication.
Preeminent among these, though, is the University.
social force in our country, it is here.

If there is a truly ecumenical

Not only does the university bridge the

different elements of our American society, but its influence now extends around
the world.

The force of a university has two dimensions--a search for the unknown,

a distribution of the known.




- 5 -

University faculty from the University of Minnesota are found throughout
the world, participating in programs sponsored by national agencies and foundations,
but also in many originating at the University.

And, of course, within our own

Upper Midwest, the influence of the University of Minnesota cuts across State
lines, nor is its role unique in this particular; as universities of the district
have developed competence in particular areas, they, too, have tended to lose
their historic intra-state orientation, and have each become a nexus in the
interchange of their choice.

There is no other place where the same sense of

urgency is attached to the identification of the problems of human relationships
and the posing of alternatives for resolution.

Every major university is a

seminal source of ideas for its areas of influence, which can at the same time
be as great as the world or as small as the classroom.

Its audience is no

longer confined to undergraduates, or even those in graduate courses; for anyone
who has even the slightest desire to expand his horizon there is a university
program.

In listening to the University station on Sunday I heard an invitation

to participate in the learning process addressed to anyone anywhere in the State
of Minnesota, who could assemble a group of fifteen.
imposed on the subject matter.

Nor was there any limitation

This is not education by correspondence in an

old-fashioned sense, but classroom experience via the telephone, with every
opportunity for an interchange with the teacher.

To a degree, expansion of these

programs has a respectable economic base, that is, many of the courses I assume are
designed to enhance the expertise of the people exposed to them in their chosen
occupations, or even to enable them to enter new and more desirable occupations.
But to an equally encouraging degree, I am also quite sure that many of them are
designed to satisfy the p a r t i c i p a n t s thirst for knowledge, his desire to know
something more about himself and his relationships to others and to the world in
which he finds himself--in short programs designed to enhance the quality of life.




- 6 -

The messianic role I have sketched for the University is not one
without its problems.
in alien cultures.

Missionaries are not always well received, especially

There is always going to be conflict between the University

and the communities, however defined, to which it extends its efforts because the
purposes of the University to teach and to learn are not always compatible with
local objectives.

As I mentioned earlier, the overwhelming desire of people

everywhere is to be left alone.
I can remember a visit once with Sir Willmett Lewis, who served as the
distinguished Washington correspondent to the London Times prior to the Second
World War, who in response to a question of how the German people could have
embarked on the national madness of nazism said he had lived in many places in
the world and believed, upon his observations, most people were good-natured, lazy,
and wanted only to be left alone, but there were a determined few who insisted
on trying to reshape the environment and its occupants to a bright image of their
own making, for good or evil.
The University in its attempts to deflect the neutral courses of groups
within society or individuals is going to incur resentments.

People are resistant

to change.

And once social equilibrium is shattered it is a foolish man indeed

who

society can preset the new point of rest.

thinks

the substitution of new values is never without pain.

No, the shaking of folkways,
The University must always

be in a running fight with those power groups who do not want their intellectual
souls saved by the University missionaries which often leads to direct confronĀ­
tation between power groups who are the unwilling shakees.
concomitant of change.

But it is an essential

The University that is unwilling to assume the risks

inherent in the extension of its area of influence may still have a role, but I
am unwilling to attempt its definition.
even has a choice today.




In fact, I doubt whether a University

- 7 -

Once we moved from a fairly passive acceptance of our environment to
the conviction we can by human reason at least condition it--with the tantalizing
and sobering possibility of someday totally reshaping not only the environment of
man but the nature of man himself--once that step was taken, there was no turning
back for the University.

It is irrevocably committed to the role of an active

aggressive intervenor in the social system of man.
withdrawn.




The outreach can never be