View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

:•* u iii
OCT

For R e l e a s e on D e l i v e r y
O c t o b e r 1 5 , 1987
5:00 P.M. P.D.T.
8:00 P.M. E . D . T .

//

THE W O R L D DEBT C R I S I S A F T E R FIVE YEARS
- W H E R E DO WE S T A N D ?
- W H E R E DO WE GO?

H. R o b e r t Heller
M e m b e r , Board of G o v e r n o r s of the Federal Reserve System

C o m m o n w e a l t h Club of C a l i f o r n i a
San F r a n c i s c o , C a l i f o r n i a
O c t o b e r 15, 1987

d
1 5 1987

// / :
.

THE WORLD DEBT CRISIS AFTER FIVE YEARS
- WHERE DO WE STAND?
- WHERE DO WE GO?

Ever since Mexico declared its inability to service its
external debt five years ago, the world debt crisis has been
with us.

Some observers have argued for the entire five

years that the debt bomb is about to explode and to destroy
the world financial system with it.

But while the problem is still with us, I would like to
suggest to you that we have made significant progress over
the last five years in defusing the potential threat. We
have developed a broad set of principles to guide the
overall approach to the problem, and in those instances
where these principles have been effectively implemented,
considerable progress has been made in overcoming the
crisis.

From Emergency Assistance to Containment and Diffusion

Three distinct stages in coping with the debt crisis can be
distinguished: there was first of all the immediate emerqenc
assistance program.

As part of this effort, official funds

were made available through international institutions, such
as the Bank for International Settlements and the
1

International Monetary Fund. Countries adopted foreign
exchange and import controls as an emergency measure to
reduce the financial hemorrhages.

The second stage emphasized containment of the problem.
Comprehensive financial adjustment programs were implemented
in many countries that tried to come to grips with the
immediate causes of the financial problems, such as large
governmental deficits, inappropriate interest rates, and
misaligned exchange rates. In many cases, the International
Monetary Fund helped in the implementation and design of
appropriate policy measures.

As part of this containment effort, commercial banks
restructured their claims and made collective commitments for
further lending, thereby preventing the problem from getting
worse.

The banks also increased their own capital,

thereby strengthening their balance sheets and enhancing
their capacity to deal with the problem.

Major banks have

now established substantial loan-loss reserves against their
exposure to heavily indebted countries, thereby erecting a
strong containment barrier to any potential future calamity.

As a result of all these containment actions, the risk of a
systemic failure that might endanger the global financial
network is now substantially reduced.

2

I would argue that we have now entered a third phase in the
process of coping with the debt problem. We have begun to
diffuse the problem, so that it can be managed successfully.
It is about that diffusion process that I want to talk with
you today.

No Global Solutions

Over the past five years it has become clear that there is no
single global solution to overcoming the debt crisis. If
there were such a comprehensive solution that is preferable
to the case-by-case approach, someone would probably have
found it by now.

While many global solutions were proffered, they did not
survive careful scrutiny as to their total costs and the
distribution of these costs among the various participants.

Many proposed solutions rest on a need to appropriate public
funds to make them work. This has proved to be unrealistic
in times of budgetary stringency in most creditor countries
and due to political resistance to using taxpayer funds for
international activities.

Other generalized proposals would impose large losses upon
the lending institutions.

Some of these proposals would

force American banks to forgive a certain portion of the
3

outstanding debt. As a result, foreign banks might find that
the likelihood of repayment on their still outstanding loans
would be increased. We would encounter the classical "free
rider" problem.

But the central flaw of these schemes is that they have not
adequately considered the potential for damage to the
ultimate objective of reestablishing access to world
financial markets on behalf of the debtor nations. It stands
to reason that if lenders were to suffer significant losses,
they would think twice before committing new funds to the
debtor countries. Yet, the restoration of private financial
flows to

these nations is the very objective of the

exercise.

Furthermore, the global solutions discussed do not offer
sufficient flexibility in dealing with the unique
circumstances pertaining to individual countries. As a
result, such schemes may well impose unnecessary costs upon
the countries as well.

Restoring Economic Growth

The keystone of the Baker initiative promulgated two years
ago is the enhancement of economic growth. Economic growth
will directly benefit the residents of the debtor countries
by enlarging the economic pie that is available to them.
4

In addition, growth will also shrink the debt service burden
of these countries relative to their economic capacity. While
we often focus on the absolute size of the debt, the truly
relevant magnitude is the size of the debt service burden
relative to the earnings of the economy. Clearly, it will be
much easier to service the existing debt within a context of
economic growth because the relative debt service burden
shrinks.

This realization became increasingly apparent after the
initial austerity programs had resulted in a 10 percent
reduction in per capita income levels in the heavily
indebted countries.

It became clear that countries could

not shrink themselves back to financial health. While
additional interest payments obligations continued to mount,
the economic base to service the debts was eroding.

Since the Baker initiative, growth has returned to the debtor
countries and at the present time we see growth rates of 5
to 6 percent in some of the most heavily indebted nations.
This is the best growth performance since the onset of the
debt service difficulties.

Key to the improvement in growth has been the economic
restructuring and increased export orientation of many
developing countries.
5

The case-by-case approach was also very instructive as it
permitted a certain degree of experimentation and learning
by doing. Even in the difficult external economic and
financial environment of the early eighties, some countries
performed spectacularly well. I need not remind you of the
showcases of Taiwan and Korea. But also relatively poor and
large countries that adopted an increasingly flexible
approach, such as India and China, did rather well.

Their

performance serves as an example that can be emulated by
others and thereby helps to shape the evolving strategy.

I am particularly impressed by the speed with which the
situation in a country can change. One recent case in point
is Mexico. Only a year ago there was much public concern
about Mexico's economic and financial prospects. Now there is
renewed confidence by both foreign and domestic investors in
the country.

How was this turnaround achieved?

It was due in large part

to a more realistic exchange rate, a tighter monetary policy,
a reduction in the fiscal deficit, tariff decreases,
a restructuring of the economy that emphasized private
sector investments, as well as a fortuitous increase in the
price of oil. Now, non-petroleum exports are expanding
rapidly and capital flight is being reversed. Mexico's
international reserves are now at a record level and
6

residents of the border states are again allowed to hold
dollar accounts. This shows the renewed confidence by
Mexicans in the future of their own country.

Investors willing to take risks have already profited
handsomely from Mexico's recovery. The Mexican stock market
has boomed and the value of shares of the Mexico Fund, which
is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, have appreciated
from about $3 to well over $12

during the course of the

last year. By this reckoning investments in Mexico have been
one of the most profitable investment opportunities in
recent years.

If Mexico's successful policies are sustained, the country
which* first encountered debt service problems may well be
among the first nations to regain access to private
financial markets as well.

Restoring Financial Stability

There is a need for innovative policies not only on behalf
of the debtor nations, but also on behalf of private and
official creditors.

Here, too, much progress has been made,

but there are still plenty of challenges ahead of us.

Also

here the key is to reduce the size of the problem through a
diffusion strategy.

7

During the last two years, commercial banks have rescheduled
approximately $110 billion in outstanding debt and committed
about $10 billion in new loans. These are substantial
magnitudes in anybody's book.

Banks showed great understanding and solidarity during the
years that they participated in what constituted essentially
involuntary lending. They did so because they recognized that
this was the most effective way to assure the continued
viability of the outstanding loans and in an effort to help
restore the creditworthiness of the debtor countries through
a cooperative effort.

But as time passed, it became increasingly clear that the
interests* of all of the banks did not necessarily coincide.
Hence, the inflexible across-the-board rescheduling approach
was abandoned in favor of the menu approach, which allowed
individual banks to select various options best suited for
their own needs.

Recent rescheduling agreements with several countries have
offered various options that will allow banks to further
diffuse their exposure and to diversify the risk that the
banks face in the debtor countries. Central to some of these
options is that they offer either an upside potential to the
bank participating in the new loan or in that they limit the
future downside potential.
8

For instance, debt to equity swaps help the country to reduce
the debt and debt service burden, while offering the bank the
opportunity to participate in a potential increase in the
value of the new equity investment.

Additional opportunities for diffusion are being created
through the establishment of mutual funds that will permit
smaller banks to participate in debt to equity conversion
opportunities while relieving them of the burden of day-today management of their equity investments.

The Federal Reserve has recently liberalized its regulations
pertaining to direct investments in commercial enterprises,
thereby facilitating debt to equity swaps.

From now on,

bank holding companies may under certain conditions acquire
100 percent of the equity in enterprises that are being
privatized by heavily indebted developing countries. This
constitutes a sharp improvement from the old 20 percent
investment limit in such enterprises.

I am proud of the role I was able to play in placing this
important issue on the Board's agenda.

Further

liberalizations in the rules and regulations may well be
forthcoming if they should prove to be helpful and not
endanger the safety and soundness of the banks.

9

Exit bonds now offered by some countries make it possible for
small banks to reduce or eliminate their exposure and to
avoid future new money obligations.

This is another example

of an innovative diffusion strategy.

Some countries have experimented with interest
capitalization schemes or offered the opportunity to convert
debt into local currency for use by charitable
organizations. In one recent instance, a charitable
organization bought a large section of Bolivian jungle as a
nature preserve at a highly advantageous price.

These are all examples of the various ways in which an
excessively heavy debt service burden is being cut into more
manageable pieces and the danger of collapse for both
«

lenders and borrowers is considerably reduced. It is true
that not one of these schemes offers an all-encompassing
solution to relieving the debt burden, but in the aggregate
they certainly make it more bearable by distributing it more
broadly.

Developing Sources of Future Finance

The economic future of the developing countries rests in no
small measure upon their success in developing new sources
of finance. Without this, growth will be stunted, and the
growing populations will have less and less capital
10

resources to complement their work effort. Developing new
sources of future finance is therefore essential to assure
future growth.

Let me outline five features of a realistic program to
restore access to financial resources.

Of primary importance is the establishment of confidence in
stable and secure economic and financial environment. This
absolutely essential if savers and investors are to commit
their financial resources to the developing countries. As
long as there is uncertainty regarding the future financial
stability and the security of property rights, no domestic
foreign investor will be willing to commit new financial
resources.

Second, it follows that any official action that underlines
the commitments made and that restores confidence should be
helpful. The announcement of formal financial stabilization
programs that carry the endorsement of the International
Monetary Fund should be most helpful in that regard. I
continue to be amazed by the argument that it is not in the
national interest to come to a formal commitment to restore
financial stability in cooperation with international
organizations, such as the IMF. It is difficult to
comprehend that the absence of the financial undertakings
that are needed to restore stability should be seen as a
11

sign of national independence and bring about a vote of
confidence by domestic savers and investors in the future of
the country.

Third, because the heavily indebted countries are already
carrying an excessive external debt burden, it is essential
that all potential domestic sources of finance are utilized
to the fullest extent possible. Realistic interest rates that
yield a positive rate of return after adjustment for
inflation will help to encourage domestic saving.
Residents of high inflation countries have become extremely
sophisticated in financial matters and will respond quickly
to the reestablishment of appropriate incentives. It has
been my observation that many people in the developing
countries search diligently for an opportunity to invest
their savings in a secure financial instrument.

Let us give

them that opportunity!

Fourth, capital flight from the developing countries must be
reversed. If the citizens of a country do not have enough
confidence to invest their funds at home, there will not be
any amount of foreign capital that will be large enough to
replenish the funds that are flowing out of the country. On
the contrary, it would be foolish for foreign investors to
presume that they have superior knowledge about local
economic conditions. Countries that have undertaken
appropriate adjustment, liberalization, and stabilization
12

programs have already experienced a substantial return of
funds held by their own residents abroad. It stands to reason
that the further restoration of confidence and economic
stability will bring about a quick return of flight capital.

Fifth, financial liberalization,including the granting of
banking licenses to foreign institutions on a
non-discriminatory basis, will enhance the strategic
interests of foreign financial institutions in the
prosperity of the developing countries. By permitting
foreign financial institutions to increase their stake in
the local economy, new financial resources can be attracted.
Furthermore, increased competition in previously segmented
and narrow financial markets will benefit domestic savers
and borrowers in the form of more attractive rates .and
improved service.

Reestablishing creditworthiness in private financial markets
is not a singular event that can be celebrated by an
announcement. Instead, access to credit markets is gained in
progressive stages. We as individuals graduated from a
government secured student loan to gas station

cards to

national credit cards. A succession of car loans and maybe a
mortgage followed before we were offered an unsecured
of credit or a start-up business loan from our bank.

Similarly, the first step for international borrowers
13

line

consists often of government-guaranteed trade credit. As
borrowers establish their track records, they progress from
private trade credit through interbank credits, project
finance, club deals involving small groups of banks, and
syndicated credits to full access to international bond and
security market financing.

The sacrifices and policy reforms undertaken by many indebted
countries have moved them upward along this continuum. It
would be regrettable indeed if this progress were to be
negated by unilateral confrontational policies.

The Low-Income Countries

While the newly industrializing countries have the economic
«
and natural resources to regain their financial footings,
there are certain low income countries whose capacity to
service external debt is severely limited. Many of these
countries have per capita incomes of $200 or $300

per year.

Many of them are located in Africa, but there are also a few
in Asia. High birth rates continue to exacerbate the
economic pressures in these countries.

Given the limited resources of these countries it is all the
more important for them to use the available scarce resources
to the best possible advantage and to enhance the
productivity of the population.
14

Private bank exposures in these countries is minimal, and
much of the official debt has been restructured or converted
into grants. The World Bank supports these countries through
IDA grants, and the IMF has established a special Structural
Adjustment Facility to assist with the needed policy reforms.
Additional funding for the SAF is now needed and it seems
appropriate that the countries that are in strong external
surplus positions take the lead in providing the necessary
funding because they have the financial capacity to do so.

We should all recognize that these low income countries
represent rather special cases that call for the compassion
of the world community and. justify concessional assistance.
But as I said before, this makes it all the more imperative
that the scarce resources available are not squandered but
used effectively.

Improving the Environment for the Debtor Countries

While there will be no resolution of the international debt
problem without appropriate policies by the developing
countries, it goes without saying that they will need open
and accessible markets for their products in the
industrialized world. It is here that the surplus countries
of Europe and Japan can and must do more by lending a helping
hand. Unless there are open export markets for the products
15

of the debtor nations, they simply will not have the
earnings to service their debt.

Furthermore, the multilateral financial organizations, like
the IMF and the World Bank, must have the financial
resources to support the often costly adjustment efforts.
The Administration has called for the establishment of a new
External Contingency Facility in the IMF which would help to
cushion the impact of adverse external events. Furthermore,
Secretary Baker has indicated that he believes that the time
is now right for a substantial capital increase for the
World Bank.

Both of these proposals should be implemented

quickly.

Together, these measures should move us further along the
difficult path of restoring the creditworthiness of the
developing countries and the sacrifices of the last five
years will not have been for naught.

16