View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE CURRENT RECOVERY

Remarks of Harold King
Member of the Board of Governors
of the
Federal Reserve System
before the
Annual Convention of the
Mississippi Bankers Association
Biloxij Mississippi
May 22, 1962

THE CURRENT RECOVERY

I would like to talk to you today about monetary policy
and commercial banking in the current business upswing.

As you

know, recovery from the I960 recession began in March .last year,
and has now proceeded a little over a year.

The occasion of your

annual convention^ therefore, provides an appropriate opportunity
for examination and appraisal of our joint efforts over this period
the determination and implementation of monetary policy,,
Viewed from my position on the Board of Governors in
Washington, this has been an important and eventful year for monetary policy.

Judged on the basis of my conversations with bankers

in various parts of the country, I believe you would also regard it
as an important and eventful year for commercial banking.
Our monetary policy in the current business expansion is
different from that in any other period of expansion over the past
decade in that bank reserves have remained readily available throughout the recoveryo

In the recoveries following both the 195U and

recessions. Federal Reserve policy began a marked shift away
from a policy of monetary ease within a few months after the low
point of the recession,,
This contrast in monetary policy is illustrated by the
manner in which reserves have been supplied to the banking system.
During the recent recovery and expansion period, the Federal Reserve
has supplied increased reserve needs through open market operations
while member bank borrowings have continued close to minimum levels.

- 2 -

In the two earlier periods, the Federal Reserve did not supply
reserves needed to cover monetary expansion through open market
operations, but rather they had to be obtained by banks through
borrowing at the Reserve Banks,

A high level of such borrowing,

which generally is undertaken with reluctance9 tends to be associated with restraint on credit expansion.
These policy differences have been dictated by fundamental
differences in the economic environment within which monetary policy
is formulated,,

For one thing, the current upswing follows a re-

cession during which reserves were not supplied in as large quantities as in previous postwar recessions and interest rates did not
decline as much.

Thus, there was less need for offsetting action

in this recovery period.

Also, the present expansion in economic

activity has not been accompanied by inflationary pressures and
speculative tendencies as occurred after the 19%h and 19^8 recessions.

Substantial amounts of unutilized industrial capacity and

a relatively high unemployment rate continue to militate against
the development of inflationary pressures.

Banker responsibility

in the allocation of credit also has been a factor in these policy
differences, for speculative use of bank credit, a problem in previous upswings, has been negligible this time0
In the current period, moreover, we have been confronted
with a much more urgent balance of payments problem than earlier.
We have endeavored, both in the recession and the recovery, to
minimize downward pressures on short-term interest rates in the

- 3 hope that we would not aggravate the outflow of short-term capital
in search of higher returns abroad.

We have never believed that we

could control the outflow of capital or gold, but we have felt it
was our responsibility to conduct our operations in such a manner
that we would not aggravate or increase any outflow.

The Treasury

has also worked in this direction by adding to the supply of 90-day
bills.
Reflecting these policy developments, the general level
of interest rates on U» S. Government securities is little higher
today than at the bottom of the recession in February 1961.

In

the early phase of the previous two upswings, the level of rates
rose substantially.
One indicator of Federal Reserve policy commonly used
both inside and outside the System is the free reserves position
of member banks.

This measure is obtained by subtracting member

bank borrowings at the Reserve Banks from the total of their excess
reserves.

This net figure has tended to move over recent business

cycles from roughly a plus $500 million in periods of recession,
when credit demands are slack and Federal Reserve is following an
easy monetary policy, to a negative $500 million, or a net borrowed
reserves position of that amount in periods of monetary restraint,
when credit demands are strong and Federal Reserve is pursuing a
policy of monetary restraint.

These $1 billion reserve-position

swings occur mainly in the amount of member bank borrowing at the
Reserve Banks.

Excess reserves, which are concentrated mainly at

country banks, fluctuate relatively little over the cycle, generally
in the $!*00-$600 million range.

-

h

-

Over the past year, free reserves of member banks generally
have remained close to $£00 million, or not far from the average in
February 1961, the month generally regarded as the low point of the
recent recession.

Borrowings at the Reserve Banks usually have re-

mained below $100 million or close to minimum levels.
Since excess reserves tend to be concentrated at country
banks, free reserves over the past year also have been concentrated
at these banks.
of free reserves.

Large city banks seldom show any appreciable volume
They tend to manage their reserve positions closely

and invest promptly any temporary excess reserves in short-term
interest-bearing assets, such as Treasury bills„

Rather than an

indication of tightness, therefore, the absence of free reserves at
these banks over the past year is largely a demonstration of their
success in rapidly putting available reserves to work in expanding
credit.
As a complement to maintenance of reserve ease in the
present upswing, there has been no change in the discount rate since
it was reduced twice as an anti—recession measure in the summer of
I960.

In the comparable phase of the 195U-57 upswing, the discount

rate had been raised once and in the 1958-60 upswing four times„
To be sure, the discount rate was not reduced as low in the recent
as in earlier recessions owing to balance of payments considerations,
yet it has not impaired achievement of monetary ease.

When reserves

are being supplied to banks in ample quantity, borrowing is rarely
necessary and little influenced by the level of the discount rate.

On the other hand, the rate does seem to have some effect on yields
of short-term Treasury bills, which are commonly utilized to adjust
temporary variations in reserve positions of individual banks.
And now I would like to say a few words about recent
growth in bank credit and deposits„

In response to this continued

ready availability of bank reserves, commercial banks have been able
to supply a large and continuing flow of new funds to credit markets
through expansion in their loans and investments.

During the pres-

ent upturn, total commercial bank credit rose at an annual rate of
8 per cent.

Member banks in the Atlanta District have participated

fully in this recent credit rise, for your loans and investments
have increased at about the same rate as the average for all commercial banks in the country.

Member banks in the St. Louis Dis-

trict have increased at a somewhat slower rate than the national
averages.

In the previous cyclical upswings, commercial bank credit

grew at an annual rate of only about

per cent, or almost one-

third less than this time.
While the banking system, aided by a continuing ample
supply of bank reserves, has been able to channel much more funds
to credit markets in this upswing than in the previous two, it has
provided less of these funds through loan expansion than formerly
and more through acquisition of investments.

In the previous two

cycles, a marked upturn in demand for bank loans began within a few
months of the cyclical trough.

This time, it began later.

In the

six months ending in April, however, the pace of loan expansion at

all commercial banks was only slightly less than in the comparable
months of the 19^8-60 expansion, but it was considerably below that
in the 195U-57 period, when demands for credit associated with large
plant and equipment expenditures and consumer durable goods purchases
were unusually strong.
On the other hand, banks have continued to add to their
holdings of U. S. Government and other securities throughout the
current period of economic expansion.

By this time in the previous

two cycles, with a large demand for loans and restricted growth in
total credit, banks had begun to reduce their Government portfolios
in order to continue to accommodate the loan demands of their customers.
The rapid expansion in bank holdings of municipal securities is particularly striking in the current cycle.

These securities

have increased at more than double the rate which prevailed in the
previous two upswings.

Moreover, the growth rate has accelerated

markedly since the end of the year, when many banks raised their
rates on time and savings deposits.

Thus far in 1962, bank hold-

ings of municipals increased at an annual rate of nearly 30 per cent,
or about double the rate prevailing over most of 1961.

In the com-

parable months of the previous two cycles, holdings of these securities had shown little change.

Since recent bank acquisitions of

municipals are reported to be largely concentrated in longer maturities, they have provided some offset to the past year's liquidity
rise in bank portfolios of U. S„ Government securities.

- 7 Associated with the rapid growth in bank credit in the
current period of business expansion has been an unusually rapid
rise in commercial bank deposits, which have increased at an annual
rate of close to 8 per cento

Most of the deposit growth has been

in time and savings deposits„

They rose 13 per cent in 1961, but

since the end of the year have been expanding at an annual rate of
25 per cent.

Demand deposits, on the other hand, have shown only a

small growth since the upturn began.
With banks experiencing somewhat less loan demand and
greater growth in total credit in the current upswing than in the
earlier ones, they appear to have retained adequate elbow room for
further loan expansion*

One indication of this is to be found in

their loan-to-deposit ratios.

While still relatively high compared

with this stage of previous expansions, current ratios are slightly
lower than they were at the end of the last upswing.

Moreover, in

view of large bank holdings of short-term Governments, any prospective problems of "lock-in" which might have been encountered in
earlier upswings would now appear to be less likely.

In addition,

the recently increased proportion of total deposits in time and
savings deposits, which are less volatile than demand deposits,
suggests that current levels of bank liquidity may actually be
more comfortable than the loan and liquidity ratios indicate.

Dur-

ing this upswing, the ratio of time to total deposits at commercial
banks has increased from 3k to 38 per cent,

I notice that in the

Atlanta District the ratio is lower and has increased only from 28
to 30 per cent.

In the St. Louis District, the increase has been

from 27 to 30 per cent.

On the basis of these considerations, commercial banks
appear to be in a good position to provide loan credit needed to
accomodate further economic growth.

Indeed, it would not be sur-

prising if you bankers at this juncture are actively seeking ways
to make borrowing more attractive.

The recent rapid growth in total

credit may help to explain why some bankers have felt that loan demand in the current upswing has been weak.

Relative to their total

assets or total deposits, which have been growing faster than their
loans, their loan ratios simply are not as high as they expected them
to be at this phase of the cycle.
In conclusion, the continuation of a policy by the Federal
Reserve of maintaining ready availability of bank reserves throughout
the recovery and expansion period has been a distinguishing feature
of the current cycle.

This policy has been made possible by another

unique feature of this upswings

the continued absence of an infla-

tionary environment and of speculative uses of credit.

Commercial

banks have responded to this policy of monetary ease by maintaining
a large flow of funds to credit markets.

Although bank loans recently

have been expanding at a relatively rapid rate, the position of the
banking system would certainly seem to assure continued availability
of credit.

Since this phase of the cycle is behaving differently

than is customary, we might reasonably wonder if we have not entered
an era in which swings in economic activity will not record advances
as spectacular as has been the rule since World War II,

There are

signs that different segments of the economy will run their own cycle

- 9 somewhat independent of the cycle in other segments of the economy.
The restraint that attractively priced foreign goods have on our
own costs and prices is quite real, and there is every indication
that we will have to learn to live with this restraint for a long
time.

Perhaps we have reached the point where stability of our

economy is not only a real possibility but is almost within our
grasp, if all our people can muster the determination to cast away
inner desires for just a little inflation where it appears to help
that individual's personal position.
that simple.

The decision could be just

The results would record more eloquently than any

words our response to challenge.

But regardless of any changes

that might or might not be under way in the modification of the
economic cycle, you and I still continue to share a joint responsibility to provide and properly channel the credit needed for sound
economic growth.