View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
Expected at 9:00 A.M. EDT
SEPTEMBER 23, 1981




STATEMENT
BY
FREDERICK H. SCHULTZ, VICE CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
BEFORE THE
SENATE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS
SEPTEMBER 23, 1981

I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this hearing on the
impact of high interest rates on small business.

Driven principally by rapid

and persistent inflation, interest rates have been at extraordinarily high
levels through much of the past several years, causing serious problems for
many sectors of the economy.
Because small businesses account for the vast majority of the firms
in this country today, and operate in all areas of the economy— in both a
geographic and business sense— it is not surprising that they are feeling
the effects of the high rates.

Moreover, there are some reasons to believe

that small businesses may be more vulnerable to the adverse consequences of
credit stringency than are larger firms.

Recently, Chairman Volcker sent a

report on the impact of high interest rates on small business as well as on
the auto, housing, and agricultural sectors to the Senate Committee on Banking.
I have submitted that report with my statement and, as a basis for discussion
at this hearing, I would like to highlight and elaborate on some of the major
points made in it concerning small businesses.
1.

Small businesses typically depend relatively more on debt financ­

ing than larger firms since their sources of equity capital are more limited.
As a result, small businesses tend to have higher ratios of debt to equity, and
the interest on the debt of small firms likely absorbs a relatively larger por­
tion of cash flow than for similarly situated larger firms.

The squeeze on

cash flows of smaller firms can be especially intense if competitive pressures
and sluggish demand prevent them from passing along the full cost of higher
interest rates to their customers.
2.
credit needs.

Small businesses tend to rely on commercial banks to meet their
This suggests that the impact of high interest rates on this

sector depends to a great extent on the cost and availability of loans at banks
and on the relationships between small businesses and their banks.



3.

Direct information on the terms of bank loans made to different

size businesses is not available, but data from the Federal Reserve Board's
Survey of Terms of Bank Lending show that rates on small loans have risen
less than those on large loans over the past several years.

Moreover, in

recent surveys, the average levels of rates on small loans at small banks, the
type usually going to small businesses, have been generally about the same or
even lower than the rates charged on larger loans at large banks.

Of course,

these data do not reflect the ability of large businesses to reduce borrowing
costs by accessing other markets, where rates at times may be more attractive.
4.

Problems of credit availability do not appear to have worsened

markedly for small business this year.

This is in contrast to earlier periods

of high interest rates, when lending at banks— especially small banks— was
severely constrained by difficulties they faced in attracting funds because of
limitations on interest rates they could pay on deposits.

In these circumstances

many small businesses encountered trouble obtaining credit at any price.

More

recently, with restraints on the rates banks can pay somewhat more relaxed, most
small businesses have access to credit, if they are willing to pay the price.
In addition, a number of banks throughout the country reportedly have been
making special efforts to be more flexible in meeting the needs of small busi­
nesses, a practice which the Federal Reserve System has consistently encouraged.
5.

Although I am confident that our assessment of the current status

of bank lending to small businesses is reasonably accurate in broad outline,
we are aware of our lack of more detailed knowledge of this crucial relation­
ship.

In that regard, the Board, in conjunction with the interagency task

force on small business finance, is currently in the process of conducting a
personal interview survey with lending officers at 250 banks throughout the




-

3

-

country on commercial bank small-business lending practices«

The interviews

include questions on availability of credit to small businesses, loan character­
istics, pricing and profitability, and use of government programs.

The infor­

mation gathered from the interviews will give us further insight into the
effects of current credit conditions on small business.

A report on the

results will be sent to the Congress in early 1982.

f. Finally, I am encouraged by reports that many firms are learning
*
to cope with the adverse financial and economic environment through such means
as improving their product pricing strategies, cutting costs, reducing inven­
tories, and managing cash more closely.

Nonetheless, the large increase in bank­

ruptcy filings since early 1980 is an indication of the difficulties being
experienced by a number of small businesses.

Of course, the bankruptcy numbers

reflect not only problems related to high interest rates, but also those related
directly to inflation and sluggish economic activity, as well as the liberal­
ization in the bankruptcy code effective October 1979.
In sum, small businesses, along with larger businesses, households,
and many lenders, are facing a very trying situation, the proximate cause of
which seems in large measure to be high interest rates and intense competition
in the credit markets for a limited supply of funds.
Moreover, many have asserted that this situation can only be worsened
by the recent surge of bank lending activity associated with mergers among
some very large firms.

The loans and commitments involved are extremely large,

and some have concluded that funds advanced for this purpose will not be
available for any other use— such as for lending to smaller businesses.




-

4

-

In my view, any effects from this activity are easily exaggerated.
First, the volume of credit involved is not that large relative to total
flows; the actual amount of loans taken down for takeover purposes appears to
be much less than the reported credit lines, in part because a number of the
lines were related to the proposed takeover of the same company.

Second,

and more importantly, these loans and the transactions they finance do not
in any fundamental sense use credit in such a way as to make it unavailable
to other borrowers.

The actual transactions involved in the mergers merely

result in a transfer of financial assets; the acquiring company borrows money
from the bank to pay the stockholders of the acquired company.

The stockholders

then likely reinvest the money or repay debt, recycling the funds through the
financial markets.

I recognize that in the short run these loans could have

some impact on the distribution of credit, possibly affecting its cost and
availability for other bank customers.

But I believe that in a freely operat­

ing financial system any distortions of this sort are likely to be small and
short-lived.
The problems facing small businesses are not related to takeover
lending; they are not even caused in the most fundamental sense by high inter­
est rates.

Rather, the principal source of their current difficulties is the

extraordinarily high and persistent level of inflation our country has experi­
enced in recent years.

Inflation has a very direct and immediate effect on

the entire cost structure of industry.

Increases in labor and other input

costs likely have a much greater impact on the earnings of small businesses
than do rising interest rates.

Recognizing this fact, small businesses until

very recently have identified inflation, not credit costs, as their principal
problem.




-

5

-

Moreover, high interest rates themselves are primarily a necessary
and unavoidable consequence of rapid inflation, augmented under current cir­
cumstances by anticipation of large federal deficits.

Only in recent months

have price increases shown significant moderation from the double-digit rates
experienced in the last two years*

The virulence of actual inflation and expec­

tations that it will continue at a high rate have prompted lenders to demand
interest rates high enough to compensate for the declining purchasing power
of the dollars they lend.

Expectations of price increases also weaken bor­

rowers' reluctance to pay high interest rates.

The impetus needed for a signif­

icant and lasting decline in interest rates is a continuing slowdown in the
actual rate of inflation and a conviction by both borrowers and lenders that
those making monetary and budget policy will not allow the rate of price
increase to reaccelerate.
Because of the problems inflation has brought to our economy, it
is imperative that the government implement policies that focus on bringing
the inflation rate down— and keeping it down.

For its part the Federal

Reserve has been seeking a gradual moderation over the longer run in the growth
of the money supply.

As this policy bears fruit, we are confident that the

result will be reduced pressures in the credit markets and an eventual decline
in interest rates.
We realize that the adjustments required will be painful; we should
not expect the reversal of a 15 year trend of accelerating inflation to be
accomplished quickly and without unpleasant side effects.

The process of

adjustment to a noninflationary environment can be made less painful, however,
if the Congress and the Administration hold down federal government spending.
The tax cuts that already have been legislated need to be balanced by additional




-

expenditure cuts.

6-

If further spending cuts are not made, pressures in finan­

cial markets will remain very strong.

Large public sector borrowing require­

ment 8 resulting from a substantial federal deficit put upward pressures on
interest rates for private borrowers— including small businesses.

I believe

it is critical, therefore, that the Congress and the Administration work to
reduce the federal deficit promptly*and substantially.

Combined with the

Federal Reserve's monetary policy, this would minimize the strains on our
economy and financial markets, and reduce the length of the adjustment process
needed to bring down inflation and, with it, interest rates.
Ve at the Federal Reserve are acutely aware of the difficulties
that have beset snail businesses in recent years.

At the same time, we think

jt is noteworthy that small businesses generally have been among the strongest
and most steadfast supporters of the Federal Reserve's policy of moderating
expansion of money and credit.

This is because they recognize that such a

course— however painful in the short run— is a necessary precondition to the
overriding goal of returning our economy to a path of steady noninflationary
growth.

We are beginning to see some indications that inflationary pressures

are now beginning to abate.

It is vitally important that we avoid the tempta­

tion of opening up the monetary spigot to obtain temporary relief from high
interest rates— relief that could come only at the expense of our long-run
progress toward reducing inflation.

Turning away from a disciplined monetary

policy would be unsound, unwise, and unfair since it would mean that the dif­
ficulties already endured would have gained nothing, and that greater disloca­
tions and more intense pain would necessarily be suffered at some point in the
future.