View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

WHY BAMS SBDULD BE INTERESTED IN IMPROVED AGRICULTURE

Address
By
Chester C» Davis
President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lcuis

Before the Missouri Bankers-University Conference
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Thursday, January 25, 1945

WHY BANKS SHOULD BE INTERESTED IN IMPROVED AGRICULTURE
It isnft difficult to understand why Missouri banks are interested in agriculture. Except for St. Louis and Kansas City, most Missouri banks operate in communities whose principal industry is agriculture. Even the city banks are indirectly dependent on agriculture.
Agriculture and improved agriculture are something different.

There is a

tendency to think of farming as a combination of brawn, sweat, and soil that produces raw products which end up in the food and apparel necessary for city living.
But good agriculture, safe agriculture, is more than that, and it is time nonagricultural groups wake up to the fact. The preservation and improvement of our
agricultural resources are vital to the future strength of our nation.

They are

vital to sound country banking in the future. Although we have recognized that
soil is the basis of all farm production, we have been primarily interested in what
the soil produced and have given too little thought to how production affects the
soil. Our interests have been in "taking from" the soil with very small emphasis
on "giving back"•
It is gratifying that Missouri bankers are giving an entire day of this
conference to the study of improved agriculture with emphasis on soil conservation
and balanced farming. You are in excellent position to assume leadership in a program of Missouri agricultural improvement. Your sponsorship of soil conservation
and balanced farming as an association program is evidence of your sincerity of
belief in better farming.
Dean Miller and Jim Burch in their discussions have vividly shown how the
adoption of soil conservation practices under balanced management can create a
greater total production per farm, lower costs and a higher net income per farm,
and a favorable balance of the soil fertility ledger.

The big job now is to spread

the gospel to more and more Missouri farms. It's a long and difficult program of
education, but don't let that fact for a moment discourage your efforts.



~ 2 Let me now become more specific on why banks should be interested in improved
agriculture.

Let?s think of improved agriculture in terms of saving soil resources,

using them properly, and re-building them.
Bankers are dealers in money*

Just how does the soil affect banks?

They are supposed to understand their wares*

For

this reason I shall attempt this presentation on a dollar and cents basis.
Improved agriculture for the individual farmer means a higher total production
at a lower production cost per unit, and a higher net income. This same principle
is applicable to an entire agricultural community.

As each farmer in a community

adopts a balanced and soil-conserving plan of operation with the resulting
improvement in his net income, he exerts a rising influence on the over-all community income level. Maximum income of an agricultural community can be attained only
when every individual farmer making up that community has adopted a balanced plan
of operation which assures his maximum production at minimum cost.

Increased

income for the farmers in an agricultural community directly affects its urbandncome*
The earnings of merchants and professional men who make up the business interests
of country towns - a term which describes the homes of most Missouri banks - are
directly dependent on the earnings of the farmers in the trade territory*
Therefore, the increased farm income that results from improved farming practices
raises the net earnings of the urban interests that serve the farmers.
So conservation farming under a balanced-management plan of operation will
directly improve the income levels and living standards of both rural and urban
residents of a community.

It will broaden the field for service and strengthen the

income of the local bank which is an integral part of any community.

Banks, then,

have a dollar and cents stake in improved agriculture quite in addition to their
natural interest in community welfare.




- 3 This interest in better farming extends indirectly to city banks even
though they may have no direct contacts with individual farmers. City bank services to business interests which depend on a farm retail cutlet are affected by
the purchasing power of the farmer which is dependent on net farm income. Through
their correspondent relationships with country banks, city banks share in the
higher bank earnings resulting from higher farm income.

Therefore, from a dollar and cents viewpoint the entire banking system
has a vital interest in improved agriculture.

Banks grow strong on the food of

business activity. Agricultural income exerts an important influence on the overall scale of business activity.

Building a stronger agriculture through improve-

ment in farm practices will contribute to stronger business activity and a stronger
banking system.
Missouri bankers as well as all bankers in agricultural areas are concerned
over the growth in the volume of credit supplied to farmers by Government agencies.
This problem may be more closely tied to proper soil management than many of us
have recognized.

Government aid is often sought when a business or industry fails

to produce sufficient income to provide minimum living stondards of the operators.
Many of the Government agricultural aid programs, at their inception, wore the
progeny of unprofitable farm operations. Experience shows that once introduced
they are not easily removed when farming returns to a profitable basis. This has
been particularly true of farm credit assistance.
Fairly recent history indicates that when farming became unprofitable, farm
credit frequently has become difficult to obtain, and farmers have turned to
Government for help.

Their plea in such instances has usually been met by the

organization of a new agency to supply credit with Government funds to tide the farmer over the emergency.



Witness the advent of the emergency crop and feed

- 4 -

loans section, the Federal Intermediate Credit Bonks, the Regional Agricultural
Credit corporations, the Production Credit system, and the Farm Security Administration, to mention just a few*

Once established, however, mcst of the Governmental

farm credit agencies have built up a clientele and a sufficient volume of business
tc perpetuate their existence long after the emergency which led tc their creation
has passed,
Twc general types cf emergenices have led to the entry cf Government intc
the farm credit field.

Beth are economic*

One occurs when economic forces ad-

versely affect the income cf the entire farming industry*

The ether is generated

by uneconomic practices or by an exploitive system of farming which gradually
depletes soil resources and fertility to sucn a degree that more and more individual farm units become unprofitable.

Banks must develop their farm services

sc as to meet both these emergencies.
I don't need to dwell long en the first type of emergency, where the entire
agricultural industry is subjected tc the forces of adverse economic readjustments.
The unfavorable position of agriculture in the early twenties following World
War I and the general collapse of the early 'thirties illustrate this type of
emergency.

I am convinced that, with proper cooperation, the banking system and

the Federal Reserve banks can meet the problems cf that emergency type better in
the future than we have met them in the past.
Actually, during those years of trial, banks were recording the experience
on which subsidized credit agencies were later tc develop a program and sell their
services to farmers without having shared the risks incident to that experience.
The banking system had sufficient resources to handle the situation in the 'twenties
and even in the 'thirties. It lacked the experience necessary to the formulation
of a longer-term constructive loan program thet would result in proper distribution
of its resources.




- 5 -

On the basis of the experience gained during the 1930*s, the entire banking
system, including the Federal Reserve System, must give further study toward the
development of a program that will result in all units of the banking system country banks, city banks, and Reserve banks - working smoothly together so that
its resources are available to the areas of greatest need.

I believe that such a

program can be developed, and that the American farmer will net need to lock
toward Government credit agencies to supply his legitimate need in periods of severe
economic depression.

My greatest fear of further inroads of Government credit into the banking
field lies in the second type of emergency.

This is not a temporary emergency

incident to the readjustment of economic forces.

It is an emergency developed over a

long period of years through a gradual process of sicl depletion resulting from
exploitive fs-rm practices.

Pie must work cut a control over soil productivity losses,

or its consequences will control us for all time to come.

An example of this emergency can be found in certain sections of the Old
South, where continued application of exploitive farming has reduced large areas
to poverty and pity.

And we don T t need to go that for away from home for our

object lessons - plenty are to be seen within a few miles of Columbia.

To bring

this problem closer home I dare say that any banicer in this room can drive into
the farm community he serves and find individual farms that through ill-use have
been reduced in productivity to the point where they will no';longer provide th«
operator and his family with even a minimum standard of living.

Such farms have

either been abandoned, absorbed into adjoining units of higher productivity, or
they are being operated through a continuous injection of Government aid through
credit, direct grants, or direct relief to the operators.

Each year the ravages

of erosion and excessive cropping are relegating more farms to this unfortunate



- 6 group*

The unusually high farm income of the war years has tended to obscure the

process on many of these farm units, but a return to a more normal farm income
situation will place many of them on a loss basis.

Every time a once productive farm falls into this submarginal emergency
classification a community asset is converted into a community liability.
alone cannot solve the problem.
of productivity is needed.

Credit

A long and socially costly program of restoration

Such a farm tends to detract from, rather then add to

the community living standard*

As mere farms are reduced to this emergency group

the community economy is weakened*

As a community becomes weaker economically, its

bank cannot escape the weakening influence.

Scund farm credit opportunities will

decrease, the deposit level of the community will likely follow a similar pattern,
and general business activity will tend tc contract.

Government credit agencies such as the Farm Security Administration thrive,
and will continue tc thrive, in areas that continue to be subjected to exploitive
farm practices, on a job the local bank cannot dc«
should be interested in improved agriculture.

This is gocd reason why banks

Constructive efforts on the part

of banks to encourage and promote soil conservation and balanced farming in their
communities can have a tremendously beneficial effect on the preservation and
restoration of soil resources.

This program, with aggressive support, can go a

long way toward eliminating the need for further secializaticn of farm credit.
Ycur interest as an association in balanced farming is evidence that you oppreciate the sickening consequences of soil ercsion and exploitive farm practices, and
their ultimate repercussions in the banking system.

Regardless of the effort you

put into this program, you will be repaid over and over again.




-7Just a brief word now on how a bank can finance the costs incidental to
the adoption on an individual farm of a complete soil conservation and balanced
farming program. As of today, providing credit necessary to the orderly completion of the balanced farming plan is not a serious problem*

Farmers are in

excellent financial circumstances and farm income of recent years has greatly
inflated the average farmer's ability to repay debt. For these reasons the
unusual expenses involved in making such adjustments can largely be paid with
cash on hand or by borrowed money which can be repaid on a short-term basis*
A return to a more normal farm income situation, which is bound to occur as soon
as the very abnormal demand for food by a war-torn world subsides, will pose
a more difficult problem.

Increased production to meet war demands can only

have resulted in an increased rate of soil depletion.

Thus, the need for soil

conservation and balanced farming practices v/ill be even more acute when the war
is finally won than it is today.

Credit necessary for individual farmers to com-

plete balanced farming plans in the postwar years v/ill likely be repaid under a
much less favorable farm income situation and will probably be repaid over a
much longer term than would generally be required today.

This program you are undertaking is not altogether a short-time affair.
It v/ill provide many loan opportunities for banks. Bank credit must be geared
to the long-time aspect of the program.

Loans must be developed that will

provide the farmer with sufficient funds to complete the program.

The unusual

costs incident to a given farm's adoption of the program will vary according to
the degree of erosion and fertility depletion and to its topography.

On farms

of level to slightly rolling topography the problem is primarily one of rearranging the cropping program and supplying through lime and fertilizer the
deficiencies of the soil*

Such farms do not present a serious problem of long-

term credit in making the change.



- 8 A much different cost problem is presented on farms of more foiling topography
where not only has vital soil fertility been depleted, but v/here much of the
precious topsoil has been removed, the ridges separated by ditches, and the hillsides lined with gullies. Not only must cropping be rearranged and deficient
elements supplied, but in many instances terracing, soil-saving dams, and ether
mechanical structures must be -employed to effectuate total erosion control. The
unusual costs invclved in revamping this type cf farm may be relatively high and
under a normal farm income situation may present a credit problem cf a five-year
or even a ten-year term.

Fully increased production resulting frcm the improved

practices would likely be relatively slow and gradual in development.

If the un-

usual ccsts incidental to this type of program are supplied by bank credit, the
bank can prcbably lock fcrward to a two-tc-five-year pericd when the amount of the
loan would be increasing with very little, if any, repayment*

If the work is

properly done, and properly maintained, however, there should follow a period of
years of increased production that can be expected to amortize the original ccsts.
Don't overlook the point thtt ultimate amortization cf the ccsts may require up to
ton years or longer from the date of inception of the program.

If the farmer and

the banker will sit down and work out a program on that basis, then I believe th^t
banks can develop a real volume cf conservation credit, to the common benefit of
the farm, the bank, and the community.

The questicn cf ownership and equity will be a factor in adapting leans
to unusual conservation ccsts. The number of years of ownership, the amcunt cf
farm mortgage indebtedness, and the operating assets and indebtedness will directly
affect the conditions of credit extension for prcmcticn of improved practices. If
the farm is just being purchased, a different set of circumstances may be presented
according to the amount cf cash the purchaser has to invest. Probably the most



*• 9

*•

difficult problem is encountered if the farm is being purchased under a farm mortgage commitment of maximum amount.
wholly adapted to that situation*

To my knowledge no one has yet cffered

a loan

The maximum farm mortgage lean approved by most

reliable farm mortgage lean companies is 75 par cent cf the appraised norraal value
cf the farm.
on

It would appear that a lender who has advanced that amount of money

a given farm could well afford to advance the additional amount necessary to

guarantee that his investment be protected from the ravages of soil erosion and
bad scil management*

Such an additional lean would need tc be worked rut carefully

for each individual purchaser on a balanced planning basis, and disbursements
would need tc be made in accordance with the plan*

The additional amount cf the

loan for conservation purposes might be made a part cf the regular mortgage loan
with repayment on an amortized basis as a part cf the over-all loan.

The farm

mortgage contract would clearly state the ccnservaticn agreement and be subject
to legal action if the contract were not fulfilled.

My point in this whcle discussion of credit is tc indicate tc you that it
is a complex problem of many ramifications.
they must lay their plans well.
bility cf credit imperative.

If banks are tc meet the challenge

Each farm is a separate problem which makes flexi-

The conservation loan will vary greatly as to amount

involved, disbursement schedules, term and plan cf repayment, and the type of
security selected.

Variation is mandatory if the individual farmer is tc be

served by a lean fitted to his peculiar needs, a condition fundamental to a successful borrower-lender relationship*

I don't think we have given the credit

aspects i.f this whole program sufficient thcught. We don't yet have the answer*
We must give the problems further study and develop plans today fcr constructive
use tomorrow*
I believe banks can and will meet the challenge*

I believe that it is a

challenge as well to the Federal Reserve System and tc the other supervisory



- 10 agencies of state and federal governments. Certainly there is nothing in the
history of the last 25 yerrs tc make most of us feel complacently sure tlv t v/e have
done our best tc develop a credit service adapted to the needs of an improved and
improving agriculture.

I congratulate the officers cf the Missouri Bankers Asso-

ciation for their foresight in devoting this day to the problem, and share with
you a feeling of pride and satisfaction that v/e have here radiating cut from the
University of Missouri the services that can show us the way*




o o o 0 0 0 o oo