View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For Release on Delivery
h pp roximately 7 p.m.,
Bastern Standard Time,
January 13, 1955.)




THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS UNIQUE

Address of C. Canby Balderston, Member,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
before the
Twenty-fifth Anniversary Dinner
of the
Lincoln National Bank and Trust Company
of Syracuse, hev York,
on Tuesday, January 18, 1955-

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS UNIQUE
Why is the Federal Reserve System unique? What difference does its
proper functioning mean to businessmen end to citizens generally? What work
does it do, how and through whom?

These are questions whose answers should be

understood by informed businessmen, especially bankers, so that they, in turn,
can interpret our central banking system to others.
As to its basic aims, the System is not peculiar in the sense of
being markedly different from the central banks of other countries.
however, are different from those of a commercial bank.

Its aims,

This may explain why

commercial bankers sometimes find its workings as difficult to comprehend as
do non-bankers.
The importance of a central bank stems primarily from the influence
that it can exert over the money supply.

The importance of this function has

been sensed ever since the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913,
although the particular problems and emphases have changed.

When,prior to

1913» the National Monetary Commission studied the need of this country for a
central bank, it was particularly concerned with averting the financial panics
which had occurred every few years because of the inflexibility of the monetary
system.

It was also concerned with the development of a monetary system which

would be more responsive to the needs of trade over shorter periods of time.
Specifically, it wished to give the country an elastic currency, to facilitate
the discounting of commercial paper, and to improve the supervision of banking.
Since then, be sic economic and financial changes have taken place;
old problems have been solved, and new ones have developed.

With experience,

understanding of the workings of the monetary mechanism has increased.

Concern

with the monetary supply h;:s been maintained, however, even though there have
been changes in emphasis.




For example, more attention has come to be placed on

-

2

-

influencing the volume of demand deposits than of currency.

No longer is a

close relationship supposed to exist between fluctuations in the volume of
commercial paper and in the volume of money.

Central banking has come to be

recognized as more than an aid in averting panics; it has a positive contri­
bution to make in bringing about healthy economic growth and a stable dollar.
Related to these goals are such cherished aims as a rising standard of con­
sumption, sustained high employment for the breadwinner, and stable values for
vridows who live on savings and for those who do the saving.
The problems of assisting to control the supply, availability and
cost of credit are highly intricate.

In dealing with them our central banking

system has the tremendous responsibility of influencing money and credit con­
ditions in such fashion as to assist in promoting economic stability and growth.
You will note that by stability I do not connote a dead level of economic
activity, but one that moves steadily into higher and higher ground.

The

supply of money, now of course consisting mainly of bank deposits, is a more
potent factor in our economy than a century ago when households were more selfsufficient, and barter was a bigger factor in commerce.

Today, money passes

from person to person and from institution to institution in accordance with
millions of decisions to buy or to sell.

If the supply of money becomes ex­

cessive in relation to the goods and services available, prices tend to rise;
if the converse is true, prices tend to fall.

Therefore, if the value of money

is to be stable and to assist the economy to move steadily upward, its supply
must be harmonized with the flow of goods.
The impact of the general supply of money upon the economy and upon
nearly all citizens is so great as to make it a matter of public interest.




Thus,

_

3

-

the supervision and control of the government is required.

The apportionment

of credit among individual borrowers, however, is not ,a matter for government,
but for private lenders.

To determine, on the basis of intimate knowledge,

which businessmen and which firms are good risks is one of the important con­
tributions of an independent private commercial banking system.

It is the

responsibility of the central bank to exert an influence over the total amount
of money, but the selection of the particular customers to whom loans are to be
made is and should be left to the discretion of commercial banks.

The role of

the Federal Reserve is potent and indispensable, but it operates indirectly
through relatively free and uncontrolled markets so that there will be a minimum
of interference with the essential freedoms of our enterprise system.
Let me emphasize here that the quality of loans is as important,
and of as great concern, as is the quantity.

The Federal Reserve influences

the general availability of money, but the competitive forces of the market
largely determine the extent and manner of its use.

Although the initial

responsibility for soundness rests with the makers of individual loans, it is
of interest to the System also that the use of credit be sound and productive.
I turn now to the philosophy that pervades the Federal Reserve System
and guides its methods.

The point has been made by Chairman Martin that the

philosophy of the System may be likened to the concept of trusteeship.
ship involves obligations that extend beyond mere legality.

Trustee­

It involves the

highest ethical and moral standards in the carrying out of the mandate issued
to the trustee. While that mandate is in force, it implies the courage to take
actions, however unpopular they may be at the moment, that the trustee believes
to be best for the country and its economy.

Naturally, the "trust indenture"

of which we are speaking, that is, the Federal Reserve Act, is not irrevocable
because it may be changed at the will of the Congress.




-

u

-

In bringing about this trustee arrangement to deal with the highly
complex problems faced by a central banking system, the Congress is to be
credited with foresight in the degree of independence with which it has sur­
rounded the System,

The nuances of independence are not easily spelled out.

They involve an opportunity, like that of the judiciary, to act objectively
without favor and without fear, free of private pressures on the one side and
partisan political pressures on the other.

Such objective sction requires

full recognition of the real needs and interests of all concerned, along with
recognition of their important roles in a properly functioning economy.
The Federal Reserve System as a central banking system has a. combina­
tion of public and private elements in its organizational structure.

Through

long decades different countries have experimented with the relation that the
central bank should have to government on the one hand and to private enterprise
on the other.

Once the Bank of England was owned privately.

is said to have owned some of its shares.
British Government.

George Washington

Now, its shares are all owned by the

The Bank of France is also nationalized, as are all of the

central banks of Russian-dominated Eastern Europe. In Belgium, the State owns
one half of the National Bank.

Indeed, Mr. Robert Auboin, Director General of

the Bank of International Settlements, has observed recently that the number of
state-owned banks in the world is greater than those not so owned.

Whatever its

form of ownership, a central bank must obviously be operated in the public in­
terest.

And to be so operated, it should be independent of both political and

financial interests.
The Federal Reserve Act provided for a unique combination of public
and private elements which is peculiarly adapted to the situation in this country.




-

5

-

It provided for a Board of Governors in Washington which has an independent
status in the government structure and reports directly to Congress.

In order

to prevent the inflexibility and lack of local knowledge that usually goes
with overly centralized authority, it also provided for a structure of district
banks and branches which now consists of 12 banks, 2U branches, and some 250
directors.

There is also a Federal Open Market Committee, which is composed

of both Board members and Reserve Bank representatives.
This structure may seem cumbersome, but it provides a mechanism by
which decentralization of functions can be combined with such coordination as
is essential to unity of action in the matters that require it. Within it,
functions that can best be carried out locally are performed by the Reserve
Banks and their branches, while policy decisions on a national scale are made
by the Board of Governors and by the Open Market Committee.
The Board of Governors is composed of 7 members appointed by the
President and confirmed by the Senate.

It has authority to establish the re­

serve requirements of member banks, within limits set by statute, and to
establish margin requirements for purchasing and carrying stocks.

It has the

authority to review and determine changes in discount rates proposed by the
Reserve Banks, to approve the appointment of their chief officers, and to
appoint three members of each of their boards of directors.
The Federal Open Market Committee is composed of the 7 members of
the Board of Governors, together with the presidents of 5 Reserve Banks.

The

5 Reserve Bank positions are rotated among the Banks, except that the President
of the New York Bank is alvrays a member.

This Committee makes all decisions

concerning System open market operations, which influence the level of un­
borrowed bank reserves.




6

-

-

The district banks and their branches perform numerous operations
I

that can be done best at the local level by personnel in close touch with
local conditions.

They administer the discount function, and their directors

customarily initiate discount rate changes.

The district banks and branches

comprise an immense network of economic intelligence through which the System
is kept informed as to the changing problems and conditions in business and
within the commercial banks themselves.
The local directors, most of whom are businessmen and bankers who
tend to abhor waste and inefficiency, provide an effective check upon the
operating performance of the Reserve Banks.

Six of the directors of each

Reserve Bank are elected by member banks, which own all the stock in the Fed­
eral Reserve Banks.

Such ownership is often viewed as a compulsory contribu­

tion by member banks to the capital funds of their Reserve Banks rather than
asproprietorship in the strict sense.

Nevertheless, member banks tend to keep

in closer touch with their Federal Reserve Bank: because of their stock owner­
ship and their representation on its board of directors.
The banks in each district are divided into three size groups, each
of which elects one banker and one representative of commerce, industry, or
agriculture.
mercial banks.

The latter cannot be officers, directors, or employees of com­
Three directors, including the chairman, are appointed by the

Board of Governors.

These directors also must be free from banking connections.

The directors, both those elected by the commercial banks and those appointed
by the Board of Governors, bring to Federal Reserve problems a variety of ex­
perience.

It must be emphasized, however, that although they have different

backgrounds, their function as Federal Reserve directors is not to represent
special interests, but to serve the public.




-

7

-

President Woodrow Wilson, Senator Carter Glass, Paul M. Warburg, and
the others responsible for the founding of the System were sensitive to the
delicate balance needed between public control and domination that would
destroy the rights of individuals under our free enterprise system.

According­

ly, they contrived a system whose structure is distinctive in central banking.
It is partly governmental, partly private.
The Federal Reserve System reflects in its design a touch of genius.
Its founders recognized that the United States had a heterogeneous population,
tremendous variety in its industry, commerce and agriculture, and a banking
system that contained thousands of different units.
national banks, some not.

Some of these were

Had the United States been as small es England,

with just a few private banks whose heads could be brought quickly into con­
ference around the same table, the solution contrived by the designers of the
Federal Reserve would have been different.

But just as problems of size and

mass are reflected in the structural design of the short-legged hippopotamus
and the long-legged giraffe, so are the problems of this country's banks and
commerce reflected in the Reserve System.
the giraffe was designed by a committee.

There is a legend in Africa that
So, in effect, was the Federal Reserve,

except that the result has more symmetry.
Among the freedoms that American citizens enjoy is the freedom of
enterprise.

Like the former Chairman of our Board, Mr. Thomas B. McCabe, I

look on the Federal Reserve System as one of the greet bulwarks of such free­
dom.

It is my view that bankers have a particular responsibility to see that the

various aspects of that freedom are defended.
adequate.




Mere lip service is scarcely

-

8

-

If borrowers had not enjoyed it for so long as to take it for
granted, they would place great store upon freedom of choice in the securing
of credit.

If an entrepreneur could get a loan only by applying at the of­

fice of some government agency, or if there were only one private banking
institution to which he could turn, he would suspect that considerations other
than his ability to repay were taken into account.

Freedom to choose one's

bank was not among the freedoms listed in the Atlantic Charter, but this free­
dom would seem very significant indeed if it had to be re-won.
Then, there is the freedom that we associate with the choice of a job.
Job opportunities have been so abundant during the past decade as to provide
wide election to men and women entering the labor market.

During the first

half of this decade, about 700,000 new workers needed to be absorbed each
year.

In the first half of the 1960's, however, it will be necessary to pro­

vide job opportunities each year to 1.2 million youngsters.

That will be the

period during which the war babies will be seeking employment.

To enable

young people to choose the jobs best suited to their respective tastes and
abilities will call for a high level of employment and the full use of our
productive resources and facilities.
And then there is the freedom to buy what one chooses.

Consumers

who have the requisite buying power now enjoy a selection of products neither
known nor imagined when I was a boy.

This abundance is to be credited chiefly

to the spectacular advances in technology.

As Dr. Kenneth Mees has pointed out,

the rate of technological advance has been increasing at a rate that has itself
been increasing.

But the point that is appropriate here is that the ability of

businessmen to manufacture and sell new things has been aided by their ability
to secure the requisite funds.
sources.




In the main, these funds have come from private

_

9

-

In brief, there are certain economic freedoms in addition to the
traditional freedoms of speech, religion and conscience.

The preservation of

these freedoms, infinitely precious to all citizens, is a particular respon­
sibility of those who are part of the banking community.