View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

PROBLEMS OF MANAGEMENT — IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL
Remarks at Personnel Surveys Annual Meeting
April 3, 1974

I.

The strange (unique) nature of the Federal Reserve System.
A.

Not government; not private.

B.

Make huge "profits", yet have no direct market test for efficiency.

C.

Hybrid responsibilities.

D.

1.

Assembly line operations, with rapidly changing technology.

2.

Monetary/credit policy.

3.

Bank supervision.

Banks separate corporations, with individual boards of directors,
yet part of nation-wide system.
1.

Constant tug of war between centralization/decentralization.
a.

True of monetary policy as well as operations.

b.

Will never be settled as abstract principle, only as
working arrangement for specific functional areas.

II.

Struggling with attempts to define and digest new systems of management.
Both within each Bank, and for System as a whole.
A.




Why new systems now?
1.

Very rapid increases in (taxpayer supported) costs of running
the System.
1962

$200 million

1967

$250 million

1972

$450 million




a.

Major speed-up of check processing.
RCPC's.

2.

b.

Electronic funds transfer systems.

c.

Holding company administration.

d.

New buildings.

Unwieldy structure for "controlling" System:
Board of Governors, Presidents Conference, etc.
a.

Much frustration.

3.

Management by Objective --an idea whose time had come.

4.

Response:

Planning and Control System (PACS).

Within the Bank:
1.

Establishment of goals and objectives.
Dovetail bank, departments, individual officers:

2.

An integrated process of management:

C I T E #2,

time phased planning,

budgeting, expenditure control, performance review.
3.

New demands on managers and staff.
But also, hopefully, new channels of communication:
Performance evaluation; ombudsman; senior staff group;
black/white awareness; planning/budgeting at unit level
job enrichment.

4.

Staff development program - C I T E
(Not yet integrated:

education program).

3

C.




.

For System as a whole:
1.

Complexity.
Already mentioned:

Board of Governors, Conference of

Presidents.
In addition:

Conference of First Vice Presidents;
Board Committee on Reserve Bank Operations;
Executive Committee on Cost Improvement.

2.

Theory of Organization - Drucker (HBR Jan. Feb. 1974)
Organizational structure frequently criticized because not
sufficiently free form to provide scope for self-fulfillment.
Crisis in organization instead because old forms not adequate to
new tasks.
a.

Changes in tasks of organizations.
1)

Formerly manufacturing; now mainly services,
including banking, communications, etc.

2)

Single product/technology/market;
now multi-product/technology market.

3) Manual production workers; now knowledge workers.
b.

Suggested changes:
1)

Functional structure (engineering, production, sales,
etc.) supplemented by team approach, to
accomplish tasks (people skills move to work
tasks, rather than vice versa).

2)

Federal decentralization (decentralized authority/
centralized control - G.M.) supplemented by
simulated decentralization to measure results
and performance.

3)

Systems approach - combines team and simulated
decentralization for large, complex tasks NASA.

3.

Organizational Changes in Federal Reserve System:
a.

Improved information system for effective control.
Uniform accounting system.

Threat vs. help.

b.

Operations Research Center - to supplement task forces.

c.

Rotation of management personnel.

d.

Staff College to train managers.

e.

Redefining role of Presidents Conference to speed
response, get better control of operations.

Result:

Great flux, unsettling, compounded by move.
Yet operations only part of responsibilities.

Role of Personnel Department.
Much more being asked; and shows

in budget.

A.

Employees

Personnel

Rati o

B.




Cost per
Employee

1970-72

*

800

15

50/1

$500

1974

< 1000

25

40/1

$650

Added responsibilities:
1.

Training and education.

2.

Analytical work - partly wage controls, also analysis of
increased holidays, vacation, shift differential,
parking policy.

3.

Affirmative Action:

counselling, deaf/handicapped.

4.

Growth in work force and turnover.




More broadly, for society
Rollo May - Power and Innocence.
a.

Used to think that violence in society the product of
power and abuse of power.

b.

May says opposite:
Deeds of violence in our society are performed
largely by those trying to establish their self­
esteem, to defend their self-image, and to
demonstrate that they, too, are significant.

Personnel policies and corporate responsibility to employees and society.
A.

Growing emphasis on evaluation of job performance, not individual
characteristics (initiative, gets along, honesty).
1.

Corollary:

Not concerned with employees' life outside work,

e.g., alcoholism, etc.
B.

New justification for this approach in Glasser's Reality Therapy.
Turns classical concepts of psychotherapy on head.
1.

2.

3.

People neurotic because don't successfully satisy needs.
a.

Freud:

b.

Glasser:

needs = sex/aggression.
needs = relatedness (relationships)/respect.

People get into emotional difficulties because:
a.

Freud - society sets unattainable standards.

b.

Glasser - individual's performance doesn't meet standards.

Freud - people act "irresponsibly" because they are "ill"
(i.e., out of touch with reality).
Glasser - people are ill because they act irresponsibly.

4.

Therapy Freud - get person to understand why he became "ill" and he
will be cured.
Glasser - get person to act responsibly, and he will be cured.

C.




Implications.
1.

If we can help employees to act responsibly on job (i.e.,
understand clearly what is required, and helped to
achieve acceptable norms), will gain/enhance self-respect,
and hence lives outside work as well.