View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
10:00 a.m. EDT
June 9, 2010

Statement by
Ben S. Bernanke
Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
before the
Committee on the Budget
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
June 9, 2010

Chairman Spratt, Ranking Member Ryan, and other members of the Committee, I am
pleased to have this opportunity to offer my views on current economic and financial conditions
and on issues pertaining to the federal budget.
The Economic Outlook
The recovery in economic activity that began in the second half of last year has continued
at a moderate pace so far this year. Moreover, the economy--supported by stimulative monetary
policy and the concerted efforts of policymakers to stabilize the financial system--appears to be
on track to continue to expand through this year and next. The latest economic projections of
Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents, which were made near the end of
April, anticipate that real gross domestic product (GDP) will grow in the neighborhood of
3-1/2 percent over the course of 2010 as a whole and at a somewhat faster pace next year.1 This
pace of growth, were it to be realized, would probably be associated with only a slow reduction
in the unemployment rate over time. In this environment, inflation is likely to remain subdued.
Although the support to economic growth from fiscal policy is likely to diminish in the
coming year, the incoming data suggest that gains in private final demand will sustain the
recovery in economic activity. Real consumer spending has risen at an annual rate of nearly
3-1/2 percent so far this year, with particular strength in the highly cyclical category of durable
goods. Consumer spending is likely to increase at a moderate pace going forward, supported by
a gradual pickup in employment and income, greater consumer confidence, and some
improvement in credit conditions.

1

See “Summary of Economic Projections,” an addendum to the April Federal Open Market Committee minutes,
available at Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2010), “Minutes of the Federal Open Market
Committee, April 27-28, 2010,” press release, May 19,
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100519a.htm.

-2In the business sector, real outlays for equipment and software posted another solid gain
in the first quarter, and the increases were more broadly based than in late 2009; the available
indicators point to continued strength in the second quarter. Looking forward, investment in new
equipment and software is expected to be supported by healthy corporate balance sheets,
relatively low costs of financing of new projects, increased confidence in the durability of the
recovery, and the need of many businesses to replace aging equipment and expand capacity as
sales prospects brighten. More generally, U.S. manufacturing output, which has benefited from
strong export demand, rose at an annual rate of 9 percent over the first four months of the year.
At the same time, significant restraints on the pace of the recovery remain. In the
housing market, sales and construction have been temporarily boosted lately by the homebuyer
tax credit. But looking through these temporary movements, underlying housing activity appears
to have firmed only a little since mid-2009, with activity being weighed down, in part, by a large
inventory of distressed or vacant existing houses and by the difficulties of many builders in
obtaining credit. Spending on nonresidential buildings also is being held back by high vacancy
rates, low property prices, and strained credit conditions. Meanwhile, pressures on state and
local budgets, though tempered somewhat by ongoing federal support, have led these
governments to make further cuts in employment and construction spending.
As you know, the labor market was hit particularly hard by the recession, but we have
begun to see some modest improvement recently in employment, hours of work, and labor
income. Payroll employment rose by 431,000 in May, but that figure importantly reflected an
increase of 411,000 in hiring for the decennial census. Private payroll employment has risen an
average of 140,000 per month for the past three months, and expectations of both businesses and
households about hiring prospects have improved since the beginning of the year. In all

-3likelihood, however, a significant amount of time will be required to restore the nearly
8-1/2 million jobs that were lost over 2008 and 2009.
On the inflation front, recent data continue to show a subdued rate of increase in
consumer prices. For the three months ended in April, the price index for personal consumption
expenditures rose at an annual rate of just 1/2 percent, as energy prices declined and the index
excluding food and energy rose at an annual rate of about 1 percent. Over the past two years,
overall consumer prices have fluctuated in response to large swings in energy and food prices.
But aside from these volatile components, a moderation in inflation has been clear and broadly
based over this period. To date, long-run inflation expectations have been stable, with most
survey-based measures remaining within the narrow ranges that have prevailed for the past few
years. Measures based on nominal and indexed Treasury yields have decreased somewhat of
late, but at least part of these declines reflect market responses to changes in the financial
situation in Europe, to which I now turn.
Developments in Europe
Since late last year, market concerns have mounted over the ability of Greece and a
number of other euro-area countries to manage their sizable budget deficits and high levels of
public debt. By early May, financial strains had increased significantly as investors focused on
several interrelated issues, including whether the fiscally stronger euro-area governments would
provide financial support to the weakest members, the extent to which euro-area growth would
be slowed by efforts at fiscal consolidation, and the extent of exposure of major European
financial institutions to vulnerable countries.
U.S. financial markets have been roiled in recent weeks by these developments, which
have triggered a reduction in demand for risky assets: Broad equity market indexes have

-4declined, and implied volatility has risen considerably. Treasury yields have fallen as much as
50 basis points since late April, primarily as a result of safe-haven flows that boosted the demand
for Treasury securities. Corporate spreads have widened over the same period, and some
issuance of corporate bonds has been postponed, especially by speculative-grade issuers.
In response to these concerns, European leaders have put in place a number of strong
measures. Countries under stress have committed to address their fiscal problems. A major
assistance package has been established jointly by the European Union (EU) and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) for Greece. To backstop near-term financing needs of its
members more generally, the EU has established a European Financial Stabilization Mechanism
with up to 500 billion euros in funding, which could be used in tandem with significant bilateral
support from the IMF. EU leaders are also discussing proposals to tighten surveillance of
members’ fiscal performance and improve the design of the EU’s fiscal support mechanisms.
In addition, to address strains in European financial markets, the European Central Bank
(ECB) has begun purchasing debt securities in markets that it sees as malfunctioning, and has
resumed auctions of three- and six-month loans of euros in unlimited quantities to borrowers
with appropriate collateral. To help ease strains in U.S. dollar funding markets, the Federal
Reserve has reestablished temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap lines with the ECB and other
major central banks. To date, drawings under these swap lines remain quite limited and far
below their peaks reached at the height of the financial crisis in late 2008, but they are
nevertheless providing an important backstop for the functioning of dollar funding markets.
More generally, our ongoing international cooperation sends an important signal to global
financial markets that we will take the actions necessary to ensure stability and continued
economic recovery.

-5The actions taken by European leaders represent a firm commitment to resolve the
prevailing stresses and restore market confidence and stability. If markets continue to stabilize,
then the effects of the crisis on economic growth in the United States seem likely to be modest.
Although the recent fall in equity prices and weaker economic prospects in Europe will leave
some imprint on the U.S. economy, offsetting factors include declines in interest rates on
Treasury bonds and home mortgages as well as lower prices for oil and some other globally
traded commodities. The Federal Reserve will remain highly attentive to developments abroad
and to their potential effects on the U.S. economy.
Fiscal Sustainability
Ongoing developments in Europe point to the importance of maintaining sound
government finances. In many ways, the United States enjoys a uniquely favored position. Our
economy is large, diversified, and flexible; our financial markets are deep and liquid; and, as I
have mentioned, in the midst of financial turmoil, global investors have viewed Treasury
securities as a safe haven. Nevertheless, history makes clear that failure to achieve fiscal
sustainability will, over time, sap the nation’s economic vitality, reduce our living standards, and
greatly increase the risk of economic and financial instability.
Our nation’s fiscal position has deteriorated appreciably since the onset of the financial
crisis and the recession. The exceptional increase in the deficit has in large part reflected the
effects of the weak economy on tax revenues and spending, along with the necessary policy
actions taken to ease the recession and steady financial markets. As the economy and financial
markets continue to recover, and as the actions taken to provide economic stimulus and promote
financial stability are phased out, the budget deficit should narrow over the next few years.

-6Even after economic and financial conditions have returned to normal, however, in the
absence of further policy actions, the federal budget appears to be on an unsustainable path. A
variety of projections that extrapolate current policies and make plausible assumptions about the
future evolution of the economy show a structural budget gap that is both large relative to the
size of the economy and increasing over time.
Among the primary forces putting upward pressure on the deficit is the aging of the U.S.
population, as the number of persons expected to be working and paying taxes into various
programs is rising more slowly than the number of persons projected to receive benefits.
Notably, this year about 5 individuals are between the ages of 20 and 64 for each person aged 65
or older. By the time most of the baby boomers have retired in 2030, this ratio is projected to
have declined to around 3. In addition, government expenditures on health care for both retirees
and non-retirees have continued to rise rapidly as increases in the costs of care have exceeded
increases in incomes. To avoid sharp, disruptive shifts in spending programs and tax policies in
the future, and to retain the confidence of the public and the markets, we should be planning now
how we will meet these looming budgetary challenges.
Achieving long-term fiscal sustainability will be difficult. But unless we as a nation
make a strong commitment to fiscal responsibility, in the longer run, we will have neither
financial stability nor healthy economic growth.