View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
2 15 p m , E S T
December 3, 1997

Remarks by

Alan Greenspan

Chairman

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

at

Syracuse University

Syracuse, New York

December 3, 1997

I welcome the opportunity to lecture today at Syracuse University because I
believe that the education community has a crucial role to play in the current era of
rapid economic change

Our businesses and workers are confronting a dynamic set of

forces that will influence our nation's ability to compete worldwide in the years ahead
Our success in preparing workers and managers to harness those forces will be an
important element in the outcome
One of the most central dynamic forces is the accelerated expansion of
computer and telecommunications technologies, which can be reasonably expected to
appreciably raise our standard of living in the twenty-first century

In the short run,

however, fast-paced technological change creates an environment m which the stock of
plant and equipment with which most managers and workers mteract is turning over
more rapidly, creating a perception that human skills are becoming obsolete at a rate
perhaps unprecedented in American history

I shall endeavor to place this most

unusual phenomenon in the context of the broader changes in our economy and, I
hope, to explain why education, especially to enhance advanced skills, is so vital to
the future growth of our economy
Wealth has always been created, virtually by definition, when individuals
use their growing knowledge to interact with an expanding capital stock to produce
goods and services of value Assisted by the whole array of market prices,
entrepreneurs seek to identify the types of products and services that individuals will
value More specifically, they seek the added value that customers place on products
and services tailored to their particular needs, delivered in shorter time frames, or
improved in quality

-2A century ago, much, if not most, of our effort was expended in producing
food, clothing, and shelter

Only when crop yields increased, steam power was

developed, and textile fabrication became more efficient were available work hours
freed for the production and consumption of more discretionary goods and services
We manufactured cars and refrigerators and learned how to produce them with ever
less human effort

As those products found their way into most homes, human effort

moved on to the creation of values that were less constrained by limits of physical
bulk, such as smaller, transistor-based electronics, and beyond to a wide variety of
impalpable services-medical care, education, entertainment, travel, to name just a few
The demand for a virtually infinite array of impalpable values is, to a first
approximation, insatiable

Understandably, today's efforts to create new values for

consumers concentrates on these impalpables, which offer the highest potential value
added relative to costs in physical resources and human effort
Unbundling the particular characteristics of each good or service facilitates
maximizing its value to each individual

Some individuals place more value on, and

are willing to pay more for, style y rather than style x, whereas others prefer x
Producing both x and y enhances overall consumer well-being Fifty years ago, only x
was feasible

This striving to expand the options for satisfying the particular needs of

individuals inevitably results in a shift toward value created through the exploitation of
ideas and concepts—or, more generally, mformation-from the more straightforward
utilization of physical resources and manual labor

-3Thus, it should come as no surprise that, over the past century, by far the
largest part of the growth in America's real gross domestic product is the result of new
insights and, more broadly, new information about how to rearrange physical reality to
achieve ever-higher standards of living The amount of physical input into our real
GDP, measured in bulk or weight, has contributed only modestly to economic growth
since the turn of the century

We have, for example, dramatically reduced the physical

bulk of our radios, by substituting transistors for vacuum tubes Thin fiber optic cable
has replaced huge tonnages of copper wire New architectural, engineering, and
materials technologies have enabled the construction of buildings enclosing the same
amount of space, but with far less physical material than was required, say, 50 or 100
years ago Most recently, mobile phones have become significantly downsized as they
have been improved
As it became technologically possible to differentiate output to meet the
increasingly calibrated choices that consumers now regularly make, the value of
information creation and its transfer was expanded

Hence, it is understandable that

our advanced computer and telecommunications products have been accorded
particularly high value and, thus, why computer and telecommunications companies
that successfully innovate in this field exhibit particularly elevated stock market
values
Breakthroughs in all areas of technology are continually adding to the
growing list of almost wholly conceptual elements in our economic output

These

-4developments are affecting how we produce output and are demanding greater
specialized knowledge
We could expect the widespread and effective application of information
and other technologies to significantly increase productivity and reduce business costs
Certainly, we can already see dramatic improvements in quality control that have
sharply reduced costly product rejects and lost time, while computer and satellite
technology has markedly improved the efficiencies of moving goods through even
more sophisticated, just-in-time, inventory systems With computer-assisted design,
experiments can be evaluated in a virtual reality setting, where mistakes can be readily
corrected without the misuse of time and materials And new technologies have had
extensive applications in the services sector—for example, in health services, where
improvements in both diagnosis and treatment have been singularly impressive, in
airline efficiency and safety, and in secretarial services now dominated by word
processing, faxes, and voice and electronic mail
The accelerated pace of technological advance has also interacted with the
rapid rise in financial innovation, with the result that business services and financial
transactions now are transmitted almost instantaneously across global networks
Financial instruments have become increasingly diverse, products more customized,
and markets more intensely competitive

The scope and size of our financial sector

has grown rapidly because of its ability to facilitate the financing of products and
services that are themselves valued highly in the marketplace

Our nation's financial

-5institutions, as a consequence, are endeavoring to find more effective and efficient
ways to deliver their services
In this environment, America's prospects for economic growth will depend
greatly on our capacity to develop and to apply new technology

Unfortunately, we

have found that we never can predict with any precision which particular technology
or synergies of technologies will add significantly to our knowledge and our ability to
gain from that knowledge

For instance, Alexander Graham Bell initially viewed the

telephone solely as a business instrument-merely an enhancement of the telegraph for
use in transmitting very specific messages Indeed, he offered to sell his telephone
patent to Western Union for only $100,000, but he was turned down

Similarly,

Marconi, at first, overlooked the radio's value as a public broadcast medium, instead
believing its principal application would be in the transmission of point-to-point
messages, such as ship-to-ship, where communication by wire was infeasible
Moreover, we must recognize that an innovation's full potential may be
realized only after extensive improvements or after complementary innovations in
other fields of science

According to Charles Townes, a Nobel Prize winner for his

work on the laser, the attorneys for Bell Labs initially, in the late 1960s, refused to
patent the laser because they believed it had no applications in the field of
telecommunications

Only in the 1980s, after extensive improvements in fiber optics

technology, did the laser's importance for telecommunications become apparent
America's continued success in garnering the benefits of technological
advance will depend on the ability of our businesses to deal with risk and uncertainty

-6Moreover, our ability to remain in the forefront of new ideas and products will be ever
more difficult because of the rapid international diffusion of technology

Nonetheless,

to date, we have not fallen behind in converting scientific and technological
breakthroughs into viable commercial products
Even if the most recent, tentative indications that productivity growth may
be speeding up were to turn out to be less than we had hoped, it is possible that the
big increases in efficiency growing out of the introduction of computers and
communications systems may still lie ahead Past innovations, such as the advent of
electricity or the invention of the gasoline-powered motor, required the development of
considerable infrastructure before their full potential could be realized
Electricity, when it substituted for steam power late last century, was
applied to production processes that had been developed for steam For example,
gravity was used to move goods vertically in the steam environment, and that setup
did not initially change with the advent of electric power Only much later—when
horizontal factories, newly designed for optimal use of electric power, began to
dominate our industrial system—did productivity clearly accelerate

Similarly, only

when highways and gasoline service stations became extensive was the lower cost of
motor vehicle transportation achieved
In addition, full effectiveness in realizing the gains from technological
advance will require a considerable amount of human investment on the part of
managers and workers who have to implement new processes and who must be
prepared to adapt, over their lifetimes, to the ongoing change that innovations bring

-7The growth of the conceptual component of output has brought with it
accelerating demands for workers who are equipped not simply with technical knowhow, but with the ability to create, analyze, and transform information and to interact
effectively with others A popular term for the type of human capital that firms are
today employing to a greater degree is "functional literacy,"1 which perhaps sounds
deceptively simple when one considers the complex of attributes necessary to
transform information into economic value
Indeed, the debate about whether the introduction of technology would
upgrade or "deskill" the workforce is as old as Adam Smith Certainly, one can point
to some very routine types of jobs, such as those for telephone operators, that have
lower skill requirements in today's world of automated communications systems than
when more labor-intensive manual phone systems were in place But, on the whole,
the evidence suggests that across a wide range of industries, employers have upgraded
their skill mix z Importantly, these changes represent not simply a shift in the
occupational mix, but, to a larger degree, an upgrading of skill requirements of
individual jobs, for which the range and complexity of tasks and the scope for
problem-solving and decisionmaking has expanded

1 Frederic L Pryor and David Schaffer, "Wages and the University Educated A Paradox
Resolved," Monthly Labor Review (July 1997), pp 3-14
2 Peter Cappelh, "Are Skilling Requirements Rising"? Evidence from Production and
Clerical Jobs," Industrial and Labor Relations Review (April 1993), pp 515-530, and
"Technology and Skill Requirements Implications for Establishment Wage Structures," New
England Economic Review, Special Issue on Earnings and Inequality (May/June, 1996), pp
139-154

-8This process appears to have occurred more rapidly in those businesses
with greater computer utilization 3 However, this is not to argue that growing use of
technology alone can explain the accelerated demand for more skilled workers A
1994 survey of employers conducted by the Census Bureau for the National Center on
the Educational Quality of the Workforce found that rising skill requirements also are
more common in firms that have introduced more flexible production systems, adopted
team management practices, or reduced the layers of management in the organization
More generally, at the root of both the rise in the demand for workers who embody
greater human capital and the increasing application of technology is the realization by
businesses that remaining competitive in today's world requires unprecedented
flexibility to adapt to change
Traditionally, broader human capital skills have been associated with higher
education, and, accordingly, the demand for college-trained workers has been
increasing rapidly

The result is that, over the past 15 years, a wide gap has opened

up between the earnings of college graduates and those of workers who stopped their
formal schooling with a high-school diploma or less But the dispersion of pay
outcomes has also increased within groups of workers with the same levels of
education, which suggests that broader cognitive skills and conceptual abilities have
become increasingly important on a wide scale, and that basic credentials, by
themselves, are not enough to ensure success in the workplace

3 David H Autor, Lawrence F Katz, and Alan B Krueger, "Computing Inequality Have
Computers Changed the Labor Market," National Bureau of Economic Research Working
Paper 5956 (March 1997)

-9Clearly our educational institutions will continue to play an important role
in preparing workers to meet these demands And, responding to the strong signals
that the returns to formal education have been rising, the supply of college-trained
labor has been increasing

School enrollment rates among traditional college-age

young people, which were little changed in the 1970s, have moved up sharply since
then At the same time, enrollment rates have picked up noticeably among individuals
aged 25 and over Presumably, many of these older students are striving to keep pace
with the new demands evolving in the job market
Indeed, an important aspect of the changing nature of jobs appears to be
that an increasing number of workers are facing the likelihood that they will need
retooling during their careers

The notion that formal degree programs at any level

can be crafted to fully support the requirements of one's lifework is being challenged
As a result, education is increasingly becoming a lifelong activity, businesses are now
looking for employees who are prepared to continue learning, and workers and
managers in many kinds of pursuits have begun to recognize that maintaining their
human capital will require persistent hard work and flexibility
Economists have long argued that more than half of the market human
capital produced in a worker's lifetime is produced on the job 4 Several decades ago,
much of that on-the-job training was acquired through work experience, today we are
seeing greater emphasis on the value of formal education and training programs for
4 Jacob Mincer, "On the Job Training Costs, Returns, and Some Implications," Journal
of Political Economy, vol 70, Supplement (October 1962), pp 50-79, and James Heckman,
Lance Lochner, and Christopher Taber, "Estimating and Evaluating Human Capital Policies in
a General Equilibrium Environment" (Working Paper, University of Chicago, 1997)

-10workers Developing human capital is perceived by many corporations as adding to
shareholder value If idea creation is increasingly the factor that engenders valueadded, then trainmg and education are crucial to the growth of company value-added
and profitability
In the private sector, a number of major corporations have mvested in their
own internal training centers—so-called corporate universities Some labor unions have
done the same More broadly, recent surveys by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and by
the Department of Education mdicate that the provision of education on the job has
risen markedly in recent years In 1995, the BLS report showed that 70 percent of
workers m establishments with 50 or more employees received some formal trainmg
during the twelve months preceding the survey Most often this training was
conducted in house by company personnel, but larger firms also relied to a great
extent on educational institutions The information collected by the Department of
Education indicated that the percentage of employed individuals who took courses
specifically to improve their current job skills rose between 1991 and 1995, by 1995,
four of every ten full-time workers aged 35 to 54 had sought to upgrade their skills
The survey shows that growing proportions of workers with a high-school education or
less and of those in production and craft jobs sought additional training, however,
college graduates and those in professional occupations still reported the highest
incidence of additional coursework-almost 50 percent

Thus, learning does seem to

beget perhaps both a capacity as well as a desire for more learning

-11This finding should underscore the need to begin the learning process as
early as possible

In the long run, better child-rearing and better basic education at the

elementary and secondary school level are essential to providing the foundation for a
lifetime of learning

At the same time, we must be alert to the need to improve the

skills and earning power of those who appear to be falling behind We must also
develop strategies to overcome the education deficiencies of all too many of our young
people, and to renew the skills of workers who have not kept up with the changing
demands of the workplace
The recognition that more productive workers and learning go hand-in-hand
is becoming ever more visible in both schools and in the workplace

Expanded

linkages between business and education should be encouraged at all levels of our
education system

Building bridges between our educational institutions and the

private business sector should have payoffs in how well graduates are prepared to
meet the challenges of an increasingly knowledge-based global economy

Indeed, a

recent study argues that we need not rely on colleges and universities to teach "the
new basic skills" to prepare workers for jobs in a knowledge-based economy, that
foundation could be built in high schools if only more high schools were to ensure
that graduates left with not only essential basic reading and computational skills, but
also with training in how to solve semi-structured problems, how to make oral
presentations, and how to work in diverse groups 5 Those researchers argue for a

5 Richard J Murnane and Frank Levy, Teaching the New Basic Skills Principles for
Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy (The Free Press, 1997)

-12better connection between secondary school curricula and business needs--"vocational
education" in a very broad sense rather than the traditional narrow one
While many debate how to make our elementary and secondary schools
more effective in preparing students—particularly compared with those in other
developed countries—there is little question about the quality of our university system,
which for decades has attracted growing numbers of students from abroad The payoff
to advanced training remains high, and even with higher rates of enrollment, the
supply of college-trained labor does not appear likely to outstrip the growing demands
of a rapidly changing economy

The linkages between the private sector and our

colleges and universities have a long tradition, and many schools are endeavoring to
extend those connections Your new technology building here at the Maxwell School
will be a valuable asset in that effort
The advent of the twenty-first century will certainly bring new challenges
and new possibilities for our businesses, our workers, and our educational system

We

cannot know the precise directions in which technological change will take us As in
the past, our economic institutions and our workforce will strive to adjust, but we must
recognize that adjustment is not automatic

All shifts in the structure of the economy

naturally create frictions and human stress, at least temporarily

However, if we are

able to boost our investment in people, ideas, and processes as well as in machines,
the economy can readily adapt to change, and support ever-rising standards of living