View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
8:30 p.m. EDT
June 20, 1995

Remarks by
Alan Greenspan
Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
before
The Economic Club of New York
New York, N.Y.
June 20, 1995

I am pleased to be with you tonight

As you know, I

was an active member of this Club for many years and an
interested audience on occasions such as these, so I was glad
to get your invitation some months ago to appear again on the
other side of the dais, so to speak

It has been a little

more than two years since I last addressed the Economic Club
of New York, and much has happened since
My main topic for this evening is the evolving
global financial environment and its implications for central
banks

One of the most significant implications of the

globalization process has been to increase the importance of
consistently following disciplined macroeconomic policies to
promote stable economies

In this regard, I thought it might

be appropriate to take a few minutes at the outset to review
the current situation in the United States
As you all know, the Federal Reserve began to
tighten monetary policy in February 1994

By that time,

evidence became increasingly persuasive that the financial
strains that earlier had been holding back economic expansion
had eased considerably

Borrower and lender balance sheets

and income statements had improved markedly, and credit was
readily available and increasingly used

Improving financial

conditions were accompanied by a considerable strengthening
of economic growth and a more rapid rise in levels of
resource utilization

Under these circumstances, if policy

- 2 weren't tightened at an early time, the likely result would
have been an unsustainable pace of expansion and mounting
inflationary pressures, which would unleash destabilizing
forces in the economy
By 1995, the monetary tightening began to damp the
increase in underlying demand

This year has seen an

appreciable slowing in the rate of growth of final sales from
the torrid pace of 1994 and production adjustments to control inventory levels

A moderation in growth was inevit-

able, and desirable, as the economy began to operate in the
neighborhood of its long-term productive potential

The

longer it was delayed, the more severe the subsequent correction in output was likely to be, owing in part to the increasing risks of a major inventory buildup that would have
to be reversed

The process of slowing to a more sustainable

pace has not been entirely smooth--anyone who thought it
would be is not a very close student of economic history or
human nature

As I have indicated over the past several

weeks, incoming information on the forces involved does suggest some increased risk of a modest near-term recession, but
the early onset of this process of moderation also indicates
markedly reduced prospects for a more severe inventoryinduced downturn later
It is difficult at this point to judge with any confidence how these various forces will work themselves out in

- 3 the period ahead

The pattern of inventory investment is

crucial to the outlook

In recent years, improvements in

technology and procedures have helped the managers of American businesses operate with increasingly leaner inventories,
this was reflected in a fairly dramatic decline in inventorysales ratios from the early 1990s into 1994

But there was

obviously a limit to how far these ratios could be compressed
without further technological improvements, and once the
ratios flattened out last year, continuing robust sales
growth necessarily led to a much higher rate of inventory
investment

With sales growth slowing this year, overall

inventory-sales ratios have increased slightly, and a few key
industries have found themselves with troubling overhangs
But aggregate ratios are still low by historic standards,
and the prospects of a substantial inventory liquidation,
which characterized many of the sharp post-war contractions,
seem limited
Although inventory investment patterns are likely to
dominate near-term fluctuations in activity, it is final
sales that provide the underpinnings for sustained growth
Movements in financial markets recently, along with ample
credit availability, should help support underlying demand
going forward

Nonetheless, uncertainties abound

In part

they arise from the inventory adjustment itself, which can
feed back on final sales

Ideally, production adjustments

- 4 should quickly shut off unintended inventory accumulation,
avoiding a prolonged period of weakness that could adversely
affect business and consumer confidence and spending plans
But the "ideal" and the "real" often do not converge

More-

over, demand can be buffeted by a number of other factors,
including importantly in current circumstances, evolving
fiscal policy and economic conditions abroad
A complex business cycle process is underway, whose
outcome is yet to be determined

For the Federal Reserve it

is a time for intensifying our normal surveillance and analysis of ongoing developments, to gauge whether policy still is
appropriately positioned to foster sustained economic expansion

Of one thing I am certain--our Federal Open Market

Committee meeting in a couple of weeks will be most engaging
I am also confident that the consideration given to the
stance of policy will be in the context of our longer-term
goal of price stability

A consistently disciplined monetary

policy is what our global financial system increasingly
requires and rewards
This system also requires and rewards a disciplined
fiscal policy, and in this sphere the prospects in the United
States are clearly improving

Both Congress and the Presi-

dent have committed themselves to reach budget balance early
in the next decade

Of course, too often in the past, good

intentions have gone by the boards when specific program

- 5 initiatives meet constituency pressures

But I am encouraged

that these are serious efforts, and offer the best chance in
many years to put in place a sensible budget policy

The

rewards of success would be subtle, but ultimately
substantial

Removing the debilitating overhang of budget

deficits from our entrepreneurial business system will free
resources to engage in expanded wealth creation

A more

sustainable pattern of domestic saving and spending would
promote lower interest rates and add to the trend of economic
growth we bequeath to following generations

Reducing the

demands of the United States on world-wide savings to finance
our deficit would also remove a potentially destabilizing
question mark over global financial markets
Removing this possible source of disruption has
become increasingly important, as global markets have evolved
rapidly in recent years, taking a more prominent role in our
economic lives

As a result of changes in communications and

information technology, and the new instruments and riskmanagement techniques they have made possible, financial
markets undoubtedly are far more efficient today than ever
before

In particular, an ever wider range of financial and

nonfmancial firms today can manage their financial risks
quite effectively, allowing them to concentrate on managing
the economic risks associated with their primary businesses
Still, for central bankers with responsibilities for

- 6 financial market stability, the new technologies and new
instruments have presented new challenges

Some argue that

market dynamics have been altered in ways that increase the
likelihood of significant market disruptions

Whatever the

merits of this argument, there is a clear sense that the new
technologies, and the financial instruments and techniques
they have made possible, have strengthened interdependences
among markets and market participants, both within and across
national boundaries

As a result, a disturbance in one

market segment or one country is likely to be transmitted far
more rapidly throughout the world economy

This tendency

poses a number of challenges to central banks as they
discharge their responsibility for the stability of the
world's interdependent financial system
It wasn't always thus

In earlier generations

information moved slowly, constrained by the state of
communications technology

Financial crises in the early

nineteenth century, for example, particularly those
associated with the Napoleonic Wars, were often related to
military and other events in faraway places

A European or

American investor's speculative position could be wiped out
by a military setback, and he might not even know about it
for days or even weeks, which, from the perspective of
central banking today, might be considered bliss

- 7 As the nineteenth century unfolded, communications
speeded up

By the turn of the century events moved more

rapidly, but their speed was at most a crawl by the standard
of today's financial markets

The environment now facing the

world's central banks—and, of course, private participants
in financial markets as well--is characterized by instant
communication

Complex financial instruments--derivative

instruments, in one form or another--are being developed to
take advantage of the gains in communications and information
technology.

Such instruments would not have flourished as

they have without the technological advances of the past
several decades

They could not be priced properly, the

markets they involve could not be arbitraged properly, and
the risks they give rise to could not be managed at all, to
say nothing of properly, without high-powered data processing
and communications capabilities
Finance, of course, is not an end in itself

It is

the institutional structure that we have developed over the
centuries to facilitate the production of goods and services
Accordingly, to understand better the evolution of today's
burgeoning global financial markets we need first to
understand the extraordinary changes that have emerged in the
past century or more in what we conventionally call the real
side of economies

the production of goods and services

same technological forces currently driving finance were

The

- 8 first evident in the production process and have had a
profound effect on what we produce and how we do it
Technological change or, more generally, ideas have
significantly altered the nature of output so that it has
become increasingly conceptual and less physical

A much

smaller proportion of the measured real gross domestic
product constitutes physical bulk today than in past
generations
As the relative cost of transporting goods falls
dramatically as a consequence of this physical downsizing,
the conceptual content of output becomes a major factor in
the increasingly rapid globalization of merchandise trade
Obviously, the less the bulk and the lower the weight, the
easier goods are to move, especially over long distances and
across national boundaries

Thus, in the United States we

have estimated that, after we adjust for average price
changes, pounds shipped per real dollar of both U S

exports

and imports are now less than half of what they were in 1970
The downsizing of American trade is, of course, a reflection
of the extent to which conceptualization is also dominating
the economies of our trading partners throughout the world
Not inconsequentially, downsizing has extraordinary
implications for our environment, since it is the extensive
use of physical resources that has created much of our

- 9 pollution and waste disposal difficulties as our populations
have increased
Of course, a significant part of the pronounced
expansion in international trade has resulted from the
breaking down of trade barriers over the years, but the
political processes that have led in that direction to a
significant extent have been pushed by the technological
changes in the composition of goods and services
Not unexpectedly, as goods and services have moved
across borders, the necessity to finance them has increased
dramatically

But what is particularly startling is how

large the expansion in cross-border finance has become,
relative to the trade it finances

To be sure, much cross-

border finance supports investment portfolios, doubtless some
largely speculative, but in the end, even they are part of
the support systems for efficient international movement of
goods and services

The relative expansion in cross-border

financial transactions is, in fact, another manifestation of
conceptual trade, as a single financial product is broken
into many pieces that, in turn, are traded
Specifically, over the decade 1983-1993, world trade
measured in nominal dollars increased by about 125 percent
But the increase in the stock of cross-border bank assets,
bond and stock issuance and derivatives, was several
multiples greater

- 10 Such rapid growth, however measured, should not be
surprising given the extent to which low-cost information
processing and communications technology have improved the
ability of customers in one part of the world to avail
themselves of borrowing, depositing, or risk-management
opportunities offered anywhere in the world on a real-time
basis
These developments enhance the process whereby an
excess of saving over investment in one country finds an
appropriate outlet in another

In short, they facilitate the

drive to equate risk-adjusted rates of return on investments
worldwide

They thereby improve the worldwide allocation of

scarce capital and, in the process, engender a huge increase
in opportunities for risk dispersion and hedging
The evolving nature of the financing of expanding
cross-border trade suggests the potential for a far larger
world financial system than currently exists

If we can

resist protectionist pressures in our societies in the
financial arena as well as in the interchange of physical
goods, we can look forward to the benefits of the
international division of labor on a much larger scale in the
21st century
What we don't know for sure, but strongly suspect,
is that the accelerating expansion of global finance may be
indispensable to the continued rapid growth in world trade in

- 11 goods and services

It is becoming increasingly evident that

many layers of financial intermediation will be required if
we are to capture the full benefits of our advances in

finance

Certainly, the emergence of a highly liquid foreign

exchange market has facilitated basic forex transactions, and
the availability of more complex hedging strategies enables
producers and investors to achieve their desired risk
positions

This owes largely to the ability of modern

financial products to unbundle complex risks in ways that
enable each counterparty to choose the combination of risks
necessary to advance its business strategy, and to eschew
those that do not

This process enhances cross-border trade

in goods and services, facilitates cross-border portfolio
investment strategies, enhances the lower-cost financing of
real capital formation on a worldwide basis and, hence, leads
to an expansion of international trade and rising standards
of living
But achieving those benefits surely will require the
maintenance of a stable macroeconomic environment

An

environment conducive to stable product prices and to
maintaining sustainable economic growth is a central
responsibility of central banks

How well we do our job has

implications for participants in financial markets because we
provide the backdrop against which individual market
participants make their decisions

Perhaps the most

- 12 important development in recent years has been the shift from
an environment of inflationary expectations built into both
business planning and financial contracts toward an
environment of lower inflation

It is important that that

progress continue
Few now question the overall benefits for economic
growth and stability of the dramatic slowdown in the rate of
price inflation on a worldwide basis over the past decade
Fewer should question the need to maintain a credible longrun commitment to price stability
A consensus has developed among monetary authorities
in most industrial countries, which is spreading to many
developing countries as well, about the need to maintain a
noninflationary environment in order to achieve maximum
sustainable growth

The statement in the communique issued

following a meeting of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank
Governors at the end of this past April that "Considerable
progress has been made in establishing the conditions
conducive to achievement and maintenance of price stability,"
and similar references to noninflationary growth in the
communique issued following last week's Halifax Summit
reflect this emergence of convergence of views about a longterm focus on achieving price stability.
In the context of rapid changes affecting financial
markets, disruptions are inevitable

The economic

- 13 consequences of these disruptions will be minimized if they
are not further compounded by financial instability
associated with fluctuations in underlying inflation trends
Thus, as international financial markets continue to expand,
central banks have twin objectives

achieving macroeconomic

stability and maintaining safe and sound financial
institutions that can take advantage of stability while
exploiting the inevitable new technological advances
The changing dynamics of modern global financial
systems require that central banks address the inevitable
increase of potential systemic risk

It is probably fair to

say that the very efficiency of global financial markets,
engendered by the rapid proliferation of financial products,
also has the capability of transmitting mistakes at a far
faster pace throughout the financial system in ways that were
unknown a generation ago, and not even remotely imagined in
the nineteenth century
Certainly, the Barings Brothers episode shows that
large losses can be created quite efficiently

Today's

technology enables single individuals to initiate massive
transactions with very rapid execution

Clearly, not only

has the productivity of global finance increased markedly,
but so, obviously, has the ability to generate losses at a
previously inconceivable rate

- 14 Moreover, increasing global financial efficiency, by
creating the mechanisms for mistakes to ricochet throughout
the global financial system, has patently increased the
potential for systemic risk

Why not then, one might ask,

bar or contain the expansion of global finance by capital
controls, transaction taxes, or other market inhibiting
initiatives?

Why not return to the less hectic and seemingly

less threatening markets of earlier years?
Endeavoring to thwart technological advance and new
knowledge and innovation through the erection of barriers to
the spread of knowledge would, as history amply demonstrates,
have large, perhaps adverse, unintended consequences
Suppressed markets in one location would be rapidly displaced
by others outside the reach of government controls and taxes
Of far greater importance, risk taking would be suppressed
Without enterprises being willing to commit resources to an
uncertain future on the basis of a new idea, wealth creation
to enhance living standards is not possible

We cannot turn

back the clock--and we should not try to do so
Rather, we should recognize that, if it is
technology that has imparted the current stress to markets,
technology can be employed to contain it

Enhancements to

financial institutions' internal risk-management systems
arguably constitute the most effective countermeasure to the

- 15 increased potential instability of the global financial
system
The availability of new technology and new
derivative financial instruments clearly has facilitated new,
more rigorous approaches to the conceptualization,
measurement, and management of risk for such systems

There

are, however, limitations to the statistical models used in
such systems owing to the necessity of overly simplifying
assumptions

Hence, human judgments, based on analytically

looser but far more realistic and comprehensive valuations of
what the future may hold, are of critical importance in risk
management

Although a sophisticated understanding of

statistical modeling techniques is important to risk
management, an intimate knowledge of the markets in which an
institution trades and of the customers it serves is turning
out to be far more important
In one sense, risk-management systems were exposed
to a very severe real-life stress test in 1994, when sharp
increases in interest rates created large losses in fixed
income markets

As a consequence, firms' models and

judgments should be sounder today than those that prevailed
in early 1994

But the Barings episode suggests that further

improvements to internal risk-management systems as well as
internal controls are needed, in some instances very
significant improvements

- 16 As recent history also demonstrates, the key danger
is that large and rapid movements of portfolio capital have
the potential to disrupt the central market mechanisms for
ensuring financial contract performance

If a spasm of

selling cannot readily be absorbed because of payment and
settlement system inadequacies, uncertainties accelerate,
inducing additional spasms and a broadening contagion of the
disruption
If the central market mechanisms hold up and
liquidity of underlying markets is preserved, risk-management
failures at individual institutions are unlikely to give rise
to systemic problems

For example, the failure of Barings

Brothers did not create systemic problems because the Asian
futures clearinghouses continued to meet their obligations,
albeit with difficulty, and the liquidity of the underlying
markets for Japanese stocks and bonds was not significantly
impaired
Experience with other recent market events supports
the same conclusions

Several studies of the 1987 stock

market crash concluded that the greatest threat to the
liquidity of the markets during that turbulent period was the
potential for a default by a major participant in the
settlement systems for equities or equity derivatives

Again

in 1990, the most serious threats to the orderly liquidation

- 17 of the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group were posed by weaknesses
in settlement arrangements
Fortunately, significant changes in payment systems
are on the horizon that will allow securities settlement
systems to be strengthened and thereby lessen the likelihood
of a loss of market liquidity

In particular, the central

banks of the European Union countries are publicly committed
to developing real-time gross settlement systems for largevolume payments as soon as possible

This will create new

opportunities for depositories in these countries to redesign
their securities transfer systems as real-time gross
settlement systems or as net settlement systems with multiple
settlements throughout the day

If depositories wish to take

advantage of such opportunities, however, they will need to
rethink fundamentally the design and operation of their
systems, including their ability to complete settlements in
the event of a default by a major participant
Central banks also have a key role to play in
dealing with potential new sources of risk and of the
transmission of shocks in financial markets

Recognizing the

increasingly interconnected nature of financial markets,
central banks of various countries are working together to
provide guides for the development of safer payment systems
In the bank supervisory area, we are extending capital
requirements for commercial banks to cover a broader array of

- 18 risks, and in the process utilizing the new technologies in
the private sector to assess the vulnerability of portfolio
configurations
In these and other ways, we must ensure that our
rapidly changing global financial system retains the capacity
to contain market shocks

This is a never-ending process

which will require vigilance on the part of both private
market participants and public regulatory authorities
In summary, recent events have taught us once again
that the global nature of trade in goods, services, and
financial instruments exerts an exacting discipline on the
behavior of central banks

Technology has defeated distance

by slashing the costs of gathering information and of
transacting

Advances in computing and financial engineering

during the past ten or fifteen years have enabled investors
and speculators to choose among a wide array of investment
instruments, allowing them to manage risks better and, when
they choose, to exert their notions about future market
movements forcefully through the use of leverage

The

former, improved risk management, has done much to make
markets more resilient, while the latter, easier recourse to
leverage, may add to the volatility of financial prices at
times
These developments have freed up the flow of
international capital, thus potentially improving the

- 19 efficiency of the allocation of the world's resources and
raising the world's living standards

They have also

permitted markets to respond more quickly and with greater
force to a country's macroeconomic policies

This puts a

special burden on the Federal Reserve because the U S

dollar

is effectively the key reserve currency of the world trading
system

In that role, we enjoy an increased demand for our

financial instruments

However, this role also heightens the

share of the demand for dollar assets that is related to more
volatile portfolio motives

The new world of financial

trading can punish policy misalignments with amazing
alacrity

This is a lesson repeated time and again, taught

in recent years by, for example, the breakdown of the
European Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992 and the plunge
1995

In the process of pursuing their domestic
objectives, central banks cannot be indifferent to the
signals coming from international financial markets
Although markets can be harsh teachers at times, the
constraints that they impose discipline our policy choices
and remind us every day of our longer-run responsibilities
While there are many policy considerations that
arise as a consequence of the rapidly expanding global
financial system, the most important is the necessity of

in

- 20 maintaining stability in the prices of goods and services and
confidence in domestic financial markets

Failure to do so

is apt to exact far greater consequences as a result of
cross-border capital movements that those which might have
prevailed a generation ago