View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
5 p.m. EST
November 18, 2002

Remarks by
Alan Greenspan
Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
at the
American Enterprise Institute Reception
for the Publication
of Allan Meltzer's
History of the Federal Reserve, Volume I
Washington, D.C.

It is a great pleasure to be part of this celebration for the publication of this remarkable
book, volume I of Allan Meltzer's History of the Federal Reserve. As Allan notes (in his
preface), this project has been nearly thirty years in the making. I understand that the first draft
of his analysis of the failure of monetary policy during the 1930s (chapter 5) dates back to 1966.
After what has surely been the most exhaustive examination to date of records of policy
discussions at the Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Allan has
provided what is, by far, the most detailed analysis of Federal Reserve policy through the Federal
Reserve-Treasury Accord of 1951. The outcome is certain to be recognized as an indispensable
input for monetary economists and economic historians alike.
Volume I takes us through the evolution of the Federal Reserve as an institution, from its
birth as a decentralized, partly private institution with diffuse power to its later development into
a central bank with semi-autonomous banks that became part of a unified system. The
exposition highlights the importance of structuring a system with appropriate incentives and
safeguards as a precondition for sound policymaking. But it also focuses on elements that the
Federal Reserve System's founders perhaps could not have anticipated, including the early
internal power struggles and the profoundly challenging economic and political events, which
contributed to policy errors. Over the years we have become more knowledgeable about how the
economic environment evolves. But to our predecessors, much was virgin policy territory. It is
no wonder that many of their initiatives went astray.
Allan successfully weaves into the story the interaction of economic ideas with events
and policy decisions and highlights how the prevalence of misperceptions and incorrect beliefs,
perhaps induced by academic theories of the day, contributed to policy errors. One may not

-2-

always agree with the conclusions regarding specific episodes or their interpretation, but any
disagreement would not take away from one's appreciation of the perceptive description of the
underlying events, debates and policy actions.
History teaches us that no matter how well intentioned economic policies and decisions
may be, policymakers never can possess enough knowledge of the complexities of the economy
nor sufficiently foresee changes in the economic environment to avoid error. But history can and
does provide examples that can help guide policymakers away from repeating the worst mistakes
of the past. Indeed, only through an understanding of historical precedents can we continue to
improve our policies. In this regard, one cannot be overly appreciative of Allan's contributions
in this and his other important works over the years.
I would like to end my remarks on this monumental thirty-year effort with but one
request. Could we put volume II on a track that's a tad faster?