The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
S C IE N T IF IC R E S E A R C H AN D DEVELO PM ENT IN A M E R IC A N INDUSTRY A STUDY OF MANPOWER AND COSTS B ulletin No. 1148 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS in co o p eratio n w ith UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN AMERICAN INDUSTRY A Study of Manpower and C osts BULLETIN NO. l l M UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR LLOYD A. MASHBURN, Acting Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS EWAN CLAGUE, Commissioner In cooperation with UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office •Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents LETTER OF TRANSM ITTAL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP LABOR, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D. C., October 3, 1953* The Secretary of Labor: I have the honor to transmit herewith a report on industri al research and development in the United States, prepared by this Bureau in cooperation vith the Department of Defense. This is the final report on a survey of private companies and nonprofit agencies (other than educational Institutions) engaged in research and development, which was conducted in 1952 by the D e partment of Defense, Research and Development Board, Walter G. Whitman, Chairman. Kenneth Colmen was mainly responsible for the planning and conduct of the survey and served as consultant in con nection with the preparation of the report. The report was prepared in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of Manpower and Employment Statistics, by Helen Wood, Robert W. Cain, and Joseph H. Schuster. The Bureau wishes to express appreciation for the assistance received from the officials of pri vate companies, professional societies, and Government agencies who reviewed the manuscript. Ewan Clague, Commissioner. Hon. Lloyd A. Mashburn, Acting Secretary of Labor. ill FOREW ORD This final report presents the findings of a nationwide survey of Industrial research and development conducted by the Re search and Development Board In mid-1952. The report vas prepared by the Division of Manpower and Employment Statistics of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. Its objec tive is to provide a comprehensive picture of Industrial research resources In the United States. I wish to express my appreciation for the cooperation received from all participating companies. In addition, the assist ance, and suggestions of the many individuals and organizations — private and Government — that aided in planning the study is ac knowledged with thanks. UUX4A— Chairman, Research euad Development Board June 25> 1953. (v) C O N TEN TS Page INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1 SUMMAHT OF FINDINGS ............................ ...... ......... 3 RESEARCH ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS .............................. Distribution of e m p l o y m e n t ...... ......................... Research engineers and scientists as percent of total employment .......................................... Employment on Government contracts ......................... Change in employment, January 1951 to January 1952 ........ 5 5 9 10 13 SUPPORTING'PERSONNEL........................................... Distribution of employment .................................. Support ratios .............................................. 17 17 17 COST OF R E S E A R C H ............. Distribution of research cost .............................. Research financed by Federal Government .................... Research cost as percent of sales .......................... 21 21 22 26 RESEARCH COST PER WORKER ....................................... Cost per research engineer or' scientist .................... Cost per engineer or scientist on Governmentfinanced r e s e a r c h ......................................... Cost per research w o r k e r .................................. 30 30 TURNOVER OF PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH STAFF ............. Annual separation rate ............................ Liability for military s e r v i c e ............. 33 3k 38 38 UO APPENDIXES: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D - Scope and method of s u r v e y ................... - Letters and schedule ......................... - Statistical data classified by industry, size of company, and size of professional research staff .............................. - Statistical data classified by major research specialty .......................... (v ii) U3 k$ 57 97 TEXT TABLES Page 1. 2. 3. l*. 5. Percent distribution of research engineers and scientists, by industry and size of company, January 1 9 5 2 .......... Percent of research engineers and scientists employed on Government prime contracts and subcontracts, b y industry and by size of company, January 1932 .................... Percent change in employment of research engineers and scientists on Government and nongovernment work, January 1951 to January 1952, b y industry and b y size of c o m p a n y ................ .................................. Cost of research on Government prime contracts and sub contracts as percent of total research cost, b y industry and by size of company, 1951 ............................ Average cost per research engineer or scientist on all research and on Government-financed research, by industry, 1951 ......................................... .. 8 11 lU 2h 35 CHARTS 1. Electrical machinery, aircraft, and chemicals industries 5 employ largest numbers of research p e r s o n n e l ..... . 2. A few large companies employ most research engineers and scientists ............................................... 6 3. Employment of research engineers and scientists increased most in defense industries during 1951 .................. 15 l;. Average number of supporting workers per research engineer or scientist was less than one in over half the com panies— much higher in a f e w ................. ........... 19 5 . Aircraft and electrical machinery industries lead in Government-financed research— chemicals and motor vehicles in privately-financed r e s e a r c h ................... 22 6. Cost of research as percent of sales was highest in industries with large defense contracts ................... 27 7. Cost per research worker varies much less among industries than cost per research engineer or scientist ............ 31 8. Large companies have higher average cost per research worker than small companies ............................. 32 9 . Average cost per research engineer or scientist was under $13,500 in half the companies— much higher in a f e w .... 33 10. Average cost per research worker was under $7>300 in half the companies— much higher in a f e w ..................... 38 11. Military calls accounted for only a small proportion of the separations of research engineers and scientists in 1951 .................................................. 39 12. A sizable proportion of research engineers and scientists are liable for military d u t y ............................ ^1 (v iii) APPENDIX TABLES Page C-l. C-2. C-3. C-4. C-5. C-6. C-7. C-8. C-9. C-10. C-ll. C-12. C-13. C-14. C- 15 . C-l6. Research and development expenditures for the United States and cost of research and development performed by Government, industry, and colleges and universities, 1941-1952 .............................. Distribution of research employment and research costs, by i n d u s t r y ........................................... Distribution of research employment and research cost, by size of c o m p a n y .................................... Distribution of research employment and research cost, by size of professional research s t a f f .... .......... Number of research engineers and scientists, by industry and size of company,January 1952 ..................... Number of research engineers and scientists, by industry and size of professional research staff, January 1952 ................................ Number of reporting companies and number of research engineers and scientists, by size of professional research staff and size of company, January 1952 .... Average number of research engineers and scientists per 100 employees, by industry and size of company, January 1952 .......................................... Average number of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts per 100 employed, by industry and size of company, and average number on Government subcontracts per 100 on all Government contracts, January 1952 .......................................... Average number of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts per 100 employed, by industry and size of professional research staff, January 1952 .................................... Percent change in employment of research engineers and scientists, January 1951 to January 1952, by industry and size of c o m p a n y ......................... Percent change in employment of research engineers and scientists, January 1951 to January 1952, by industry and size of professional research staff .... Percent change in employment of research engineers and scientists on Government prime contracts and subcontracts, January 1951 to January 1952, by i n d u s t r y .............................................. Average number of supporting personnel per research engineer or scientist, by industry and size of company, January 1952 ................................. Average number of supporting personnel per research engineer or scientist, by industry and size of professional research staff, January 1952 ............ Cost of research, by industry and size of company, 1 9 5 1 ................................ (ix) 58 59 60 6l 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 73 74 A P P E N D IX TA B LE S - C o n tin u e d Page Cost of research, hy industry and size of professional research staff, 1951 .......................... . Cost of Government-financed research as percent of total research cost, by industry and size of company, 1951 ....................................... Cost of Government-financed research as percent of total research cost, by industry and size of pro fessional research staff, 1951 ..................... Cost of research as percent of sales, by industry and size of company, 1951 .............................. Cost of research as percent of sales, by industry and size of professional research staff, 1951 ......... Average cost per research engineer or scientist, by industry and size of company, 1951 ................. Average cost per research engineer or scientist, by industry and size of professional research staff, 1951 ................................................ Average cost per research engineer or scientist on Government-financed research, by industry and size of company, 1951 .................................... Average cost per research engineer or scientist on Government-financed research, by industry and size of professional research staff, 1951 ............... Average cost per research worker, by industry and size of company, 1951 .............................. Average cost per research worker, by industry and size of professional research staff, 1951 ......... Annual separation rate of research engineers and scientists, by industry, July 1950 bo June 1951 and July to December 1951 .......................... Annual separation rate of research engineers and scientists, by industry and size of company, July to December 1951 ................... ........... Annual separation rate of research engineers and scientists, by size of company, July 1950 to June 1951 and July to December 1951 ................ Annual separation rate of research engineers and scientists, by size of professional research staff, July 1950 to June 1951 and July to December 1951 ••• Research engineers and scientists liable for military duty per 100 employed, by industry and size of company, January 1952 .............................. Research engineers and scientists liable for military duty per 100 employed, by size of professional re search staff, January 1952 ......................... (x) 75 76 78 79 81 82 84 85 87 88 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 A P P E N D IX TA B LE S - C o n tin u e d Page D-l. D-2. D-3. D-4. D-5> D- 6 . D-7. D- 8 . D-9. Number of reporting companies, by industry and major research s p e c i a l t y ..................................... Cost of research, by industry and major research specialty, 1951 .................................. Distribution of research employment and research cost, by major research specialty ........................... Number of research engineers and scientists, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, January 1952 .................................... Number of supporting workers per research engineer or scientist, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, January 1952 ............. Cost of Government-financed research as percent of total research cost, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, 1951 ........ Average cost per research engineer or scientist, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, 1 9 5 1 .... . •............................ Average cost per research worker, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, 1951 .................................................... Number of companies reporting that they were qualified to do research in selected research specialties ...... ( x i) 100 101 102 103 103 104 105 105 106 IN TROD UCTIO N Research and development in Industry is by far the largest segment of the Nation’s scientific research activity. In 1952, the national expenditures for scientific and engineering research and development totaled about 3 3A billion dollars, of which about 2 l/2 billion was for work done in laboratories and other facilities owned or operated by private industry. Both the total national outlay and the cost of the research performed by private business were more than lt-0 percent higher in 1952 than 19^ 9 — owing primarily to the emphasis on military technology which has characterized the current program of partial mobilization but also in part to the needs of an expanding civilian economy (table C-l). The demand for scientific and engineering personnel and research facilities arising from both these sources created a need for more information about private industry's huge research resources, comparable to that already available regarding the much smaller re search operations of universities and Government agencies, l/ More accurate estimates were needed of the total national cost of indus trial research, the amount of research performed by different indus tries, and the number of research engineers and scientists employed in these industries. Information on the cost of research per worker employed was also needed for use in estimating manpower requirements and determining whether proposed projects were feasible in view of the available resources of scientific and technical personnel. Other questions in which there was widespread interest were the extent of employment of supporting personnel and the effect on research staffs of calls to military service and other types of turnover. In order to obtain information on these and related ques tions, the Research and Development Board conducted in mid-1952 a questionnaire survey of the research and development activities of private companies and nonprofit research agencies (other than colleges and universities). 2/ Nearly 2,000 concerns, including l/ The Engineering College Research Council of the American Society for Engineering Education conducted a survey of research in colleges and universities in 1950* The National Science Foundation publishes statistical data on the research activities of the Federal Government. One of the Foundation's most recent publications is Federal Funds for Science, I - Federal Funds for Scientific Research and Development at Nonprofit Institutions, 1950-1951 and 1951-1952. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1953. W pp. 2/ In addition to colleges and universities, such nonprofit research agencies a3 hospitals and museums were also excluded, inas much as their normal research activities are not industrial in char acter. The scope and method of the survey are described in detail in Appendix A. (1) almost all companies with large research programs, sent in usable questionnaires. These companies employed about 6 l/2 million per sons and had sold nearly 100 billion dollars worth of goods and serv ices during 1951* The number of firms with small research, activities which were not reached by or failed to respond to the survey could not be determined exactly. However, the study covered most of the indus trial research and development work in the United States— probably about 85 percent of the total, measured in terms of 1951 cost. 3/ A preliminary report giving highlights of the survey find ings was issued at the beginning of 1953. The present report incor porates the data presented in this earlier publication and also in cludes much additional information, particularly with respect to the cost and employment experience of individual firms. Among the topics covered are the numbers of research engineers and scientists employed on both Government and nongovernment work; the employment of support ing personnel; the cost of research performed, on Government prime contracts and subcontracts and under company sponsorship; the rela tionship of research cost to value of sales; the average cost of research per employee, on Government-financed and company-financed projects; and, finally, the turnover rates among research engineers and scientists and the past and potential effects of military calls of such employees. Information is presented for different industries and for companies of different sizes. Insofar as possible, the varying ex perience of individual companies In the same industry and 3 ize group is also analyzed. Companies were asked in filling out the questionnaire to state the research specialty in which they were most competent, as well as the industry in which they belonged. Statistical data clas sified according to the companies' major research specialties and covering most of the major topics considered in the report are pre sented in Appendix D. Throughout the report, the term "research" is used to de note both research and development. The difficulty In obtaining uni form interpretation of this term from companies in the survey is one of the limitations of the data which the reader should bear in mind. This matter is discussed in greater detail along with other limita tions of the data and definitions of terms in Appendix A. 3 / The term "research cost," as used in this survey, refers to the "operating cost of research and development performed" (as defined in item 3 of the questionnaire, which is reproduced in Appendix B). The cost data obtained therefore exclude capital investment (except as reflected in depreciation charges) and also expenditures for any research services which the reporting companies purchased from other concerns. On the other hand, the figures include the cost of research performed by the given companies on funds provided by the Federal Government or other organizations. 2 SUMMARY OF FIN D IN G S RESEARCH PERSONNEL About 96,000 research engineers and scientists were employed in January 1952 by the nearly 2,000 companies in the study. Close to three-fourths were working for companies in six branches of manufac turing- -the aircraft, electrical machinery, chemicals and allied prod ucts, professional and scientific instruments, machinery (except elec trical), and petroleum refining industries. Over half were employed in the first three of these industry groups. Large companies employed most of the engineers and scien tists. Two out of three were on the staffs of companies with 5,000 or more employees. Only 1.5 percent of the employees of the reporting compa nies were research engineers or scientists. This percentage is high er, of course, than would have been found if companies without re search programs had been included in the survey. Approximately half the research engineers and scientists were working on federally financed projects, almost all of which were sponsored by the Department of Defense or the Atomic Energy Commis sion. The number employed on Government contracts was more than 50 percent higher in January 195^ than in January 1951- Nevertheless, most industries achieved some increase in employment on companyfinanced research during the year. The total number of supporting workers (including techni cians and other laboratory assistants and clerical and administrative personnel) employed by companies in the survey was 143,000. Thus, the average ratio was 1 .5 supporting workers per research engineer or scientist. However, this ratio varied widely among companies of dif ferent sizes, among industries, and from one company to another in the same industry and size group. COST OF RESEARCH The total cost of research performed by the reporting com panies was nearly 2 billion dollars during 1951. The electrical m a chinery, aircraft,and chemicals industries, which were the leading employers of research personnel, also had the greatest dollar volume of research costs— altogether, more than 1 billion dollars. The Federal Government paid for nearly half of the 1951 re search and development cost. Among major industries, the Government's share of the research cost ranged from 85 percent in aircraft manufac turing down to a low 3 percent in petroleum refining. 3 Government-financed, research accounted for about threefifths of tiae total research cost in companies with fewer than 500 em ployees, compared with about one-half of the total for larger organi zations. However, the large companies did far more research work for the Government than the small ones, because their total research ca pacity was so much greater. Research cost represented about 2 percent of the total value of sales of the reporting companies during 1951 * I*1 the aircraft in dustry the proportion reached 13 percent, but in several others it was less than 1 percent. -The proportion also varied greatly among companies in the same industry. Average cost per research engineer or scientist in 1951 was $ 21,900 (total operating cost of research divided by the average num ber of research engineers and scientists employed). Of the branches of manufacturing with large research programs, the one with the low est cost per research engineer or scientist was chemicals and allied products. At the other extreme was the motor vehicle industry, with an average cost about four times as great as that for chemicals and allied products. Figures for individual companies also varied widely. Taking all research workers into account, including sup porting personnel as well as engineers and scientists, average cost per research worker was $8,800. This cost ratio varied much less among industries and individual companies than the cost per research engineer or scientist. TURNOVER OF PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH STAFF The annual separation rate of research engineers and scien tists was 13.9 per 100 employed during the year July 1950-June 1951 > and about one-fifth higher during the last half of 1951* Separations for reasons other than military service accounted for most of the turnover in both periods. In the last half of 1951 > the annual rate of military calls was only three out of every 100 research engineers and scientists. Although military calls did not affect many research engi neers and scientists in 1950 and 1951> they could cut more deeply in the future. One-fourth of the research engineers and scientists in the study were in the categories most liable to military service; 19 percent were in the Reserves or National Guard and another 6 percent were classified either 1A or 2A by Selective Service as of January 1952. Since then, considerable change in the proportion of profes sional research workers liable for military duty has probably taken place, since men are constantly leaving and others entering the R e serves and the various Selective Service categories. k RESEA R C H E N G IN E E R S A N D SC IE N T ISTS DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYMENT Engineers and scientists engaged in industrial research and development work are concentrated, to a great extent, in a few indus tries and in large companies. In January 1952 nearly three-fourths of the 95>700 profes sional research workers in the survey were employed in six branches of manufacturing— the aircraft, electrical machinery, chemicals and allied products, professional and scientific instruments, machinery (except electrical), and petroleum refining industries (chart l ) . bj Over half were in the first three of these industry groups; more than one-fifth were in aircraft manufacturing alone. The mobilization program initiated in mid -1950 resulted in a great expansion of research hf It should be noted in connection with these and other figures classified by industry that each reporting company was placed, of necessity, in a single industry (Appendix A ) . 275235 0 - 53 - 2 5 activities in the aircraft and electrical machinery industries, par ticularly the former. It also led to a rapid growth in the research staffs of the professional and scientific instruments industry. In the chemicals, petroleum refining, and machinery (except electrical) industries, the direct effect of the defense program has been much less, but these industries have long been among the leaders in the Nation's industrial research and development effort. All other branches of manufacturing, besides the six just mentioned, together employed only 16 percent of the research engineers and scientists in the survey. Altogether, the proportion employed in manufacturing was 88 percent. The remaining 12 percent were in a variety of nonmanufacturing industries (table C-2). The concentration of professional research personnel in large organizations is apparent when companies are classified accord ing to their total employment in January 1952 (chart 2). Approximate ly lt-0 percent of the surveyed research engineers and scientists worked for the UU largest companies, each of which had at least 25,000 em ployees. These companies represented only 2 percent of the 1,953 organizations in the study. Two-thirds of the research engineers and scientists were employed by the 222 companies (ll percent of the C hart 2 A FEW LARGE COMPANIES EMPLOY MOST RESEARCH ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS Pe rcent o j Reporting Com panies Total Com pany Employment, Ja n u a ry 1952 SOUTCe! T able C - 3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATI STICS Percent of Research Engineers and Scientists 6 total) with 5,000 or more employees. In contrast, only U percent worked for the 6h2 companies (33 percent of the total) with fewer than 100 employees (table C- 3 ). The concentration of research engineers and scientists in large companies was greatest in the aircraft, motor vehicle, and petroleum refining industries (table l ) . In each of these three in dustries, about nine-tenths of the research engineers and scientists were working for companies with 5,000 or more employees. Concentra tion of personnel in large companies was characteristic also of all other major branches of manufacturing and of nonmanufacturing indus tries exclusive of commercial consulting firms and nonprofit research agencies. 5/ Organizations in these two last categories naturally tend to be much smaller than companies whose research and development programs are an adjunct to production or other operations. None of the consulting firms and nonprofit agencies in the study had as many as 5,000 employees, and nearly two-thirds of the professional research workers employed by such organizations worked for ones with fewer than 500 employees. When the figures on employment of research engineers and scientists are classified according to the size of the companies' professional research staffs, a still greater concentration of re search personnel in a few large organizations is shown. The 3*+ com panies with the largest professional research staffs (500 or more) employed approximately U8 percent of all research engineers and scientists in the survey, whereas the proportion working for the Uk companies with the largest total employment (25,000 or more) was approximately lo percent. This difference reflects the fact that some of the large companies had relatively small research programs. 6 / For example, one out of every eight companies with 5,000 or more em ployees had fewer than 15 research engineers and scientists; this group was made up principally of companies in the machinery (except electrical), textile, and food industries. On the other hand, some small companies had research staffs far above the overall average for concerns in their size group. This was true not only of commercial cons tilting and nonprofit research organizations but also of some manufacturing concerns which were devoting a great part of their resources to development work for the Armed Forces at the time of the survey. 5/ A similar pattern of concentration is noted when research engineers and scientists are classified by industry and size of pro fessional research staff (table C- 6 ). 6 / Table C-7 cross-classifies reporting companies and research engineers and scientists, by size of company and size of professional research staff. 7 Table 1, Percent distribution of research engineers end scientists, by industry and sine of company, January 1952 1/ All reporting companies Industry Companies with total employment of — Less than 500 500 to ■4,999 5,000 or more All industries........ ..... ,............ 100.0 11.2 21.8 67.0 Manufacturing ............................. 100.0 6.9 20.8 72.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 9.6 2.5 5.2 20.1 6.8 7.8 2.5 .8 18.2 7.6 24.0 10.7 15.1 40.7 39.4 22.7 10.5 9.0 25.4 29.1 66.4 86.8 79.7 39.2 53.8 69.5 87.0 90.2 56.4 63.3 100.0 UZ.fi 29.1 28.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 89.2 37.8 8.7 10.8 62.2 18.4 Chemicals and allied products....... .... Petroleum refining..... ................ Primary metal industries ................ Fabricated metal products ............... Machinery (except electrical) ....... . Electrical machinery .................... Motor vehicles and equipment............ Aircraft and parts ...................... Professional and scientific instruments .. Other manufacturing.................... Nonmanufacturing ......................... Commercial consulting f i r m s .... ........ Nonprofit research agencies ............. Other nonmanufacturing ............ ..... 1 / See ap p en d ix ta b le C-5 f o r f ig u r e s u n d e rly in g t h i s t a b le . 8 — 72.9 RESEARCH ENGINEERS AND SC IE N T IST S A S PERCENT OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT One indication of the degree of emphasis on research activ ities in different industries and in companies of different sizes is provided by data on the average number of professional research workers employed per 100 employees of all types. In interpreting these figures, it should he borne in mind that the survey was limited to organizations engaged in research and development. Hie figures do not represent the ratio of professional research employment to total employment in any industry as a whole, since many companies do no research or development work. The date of the employment information, January 1952, is also of importance in this context. At that time, defense-related development work was at a very high level and mass production on defense contracts had hardly begun in many companies in the aircraft and other industries. In later stages of the defense program the ratio of research personnel to total employment undoubt edly declined somewhat. The average number of research engineers and scientists per 100 workers in all the reporting companies taken together was found to be 1.5 in January 1952 (table C- 8 ). The aircraft industry, which employed the largest absolute number of research engineers and scien tists, was also the branch of manufacturing with the highest relative number (4.3 per 100 employees). The three manufacturing industry groups which were, in absolute numbers, the next largest employers of profession?! research personnel also had comparatively high ratios, as follows: Professional'and scientific instruments, 3*7 per 100 workers; chemicals, 3 .0 ; and electrical machinery, 2 .7 . The industry groups with the lowest ratios were primary metals (0 .3 ), motor vehicles (0.4), and nonmanufacturing industries other than consulting firms and nonprofit agencies (0.4). Commercial consulting firms and nonprofit research agencies, whose major activity is providing pro fessional services, naturally had very much higher percentages of professional research workers than any other industry (24.5 and 47.2, respectively). Each of these ratios is of course an average for all reporting companies in the given industry. The relative numbers of professional research workers employed by individual companies varied widely above and below the industry averages. There were also wide differences in the ratio of engineer ing and scientific workers to total employment among companies in the same size group. Generally, however, the small companies in the sur vey had a higher ratio than the large companies. In manufacturing as a whole, companies with less than employees had an average of research engineers and scientists per 100 employees, compared with for those with to employees and for those with or more employees. The percentage of professional research personnel had an inverse relationship to size of company in almost every major branch of manufacturing and also in most nonmanufacturing industries. 500 1.7 500 4,999 1.2 9 4.7 5,000 It should he emphasized, however, that these findings apply only to companies with research and development programs and that most small companies do no research and development work. A crosssection of all American industry would show that research engineers and scientists represent a higher proportion of total employment in large than in small companies. 7 / EMPLOYMENT ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS Since the current program of partial mobilization began in mid-1950, the Government has initiated and financed a large volume of military research and development. About one-third of this Govern ment-financed research has been conducted in laboratories owned and operated by Federal agencies. Most of the remaining two-thirds has been carried out by private industry. However, colleges and univer sities and other nonprofit institutions have also participated sig nificantly in defense research. Approximately half of the research engineers and scientists in this study were employed in January 1952 on projects sponsored by Federal agencies— in nearly every case the Department of Defense or the Atomic Energy Commission. The proportion of the professional research staff working on Government contracts was the same in non manufacturing as in manufacturing industries — by percent in each of these two industry divisions (table 2). In absolute terms, however, manufacturing industries, as a group, employ many more research engineers and scientists on Government work than do nonmanufacturing industries. The relative numbers of research engineers and scientists employed on Government work were naturally highest in the branches of manufacturing most directly related to the defense effort. In the aircraft industry, 92 percent of the professional research personnel in the study were working on Government-financed projects; in the pro fessional and scientific instruments industry, 70 percent. Commercial consulting firms had also assigned a sizable majority (66 percent) of their professional research staffs to Government work. 7 / Companies with fewer than 500 employees account for approximately 35 percent of total manufacturing employment in the United States, according to unpublished reports of the Small Defense Plants Administration. However, findings of this survey of industrial research show that companies in this size class employed less than 10 percent of the research engineers and scientists in manufacturing concerns. Statistics on employment by size of company are not availa ble for nonmanufacturing industries. 10 Table 2. P ercen t o f re se a rc h eng in eers and s c ie n tis ts employed on Government prime c o n tra c ts and su b c o n tra c ts, by in d u stry and by s iz e o f company, January 1952 Item E stim ated t o ta l number o f re se a rch eng in eers and s c ie n tis ts re p o rte d A ll types of work A. A ll in d u s trie s ......................................... M anufacturing ............................................ Chemicals and a llie d p ro d u c ts ... Petroleum re fin in g ............................ Prim ary m etal in d u s trie s .............. F ab ricated m etal products ............ M achinery (except e le c tr ic a l) .. E le c tric a l m achinery ....................... Motor v e h ic le s and equipm ent . . . A irc ra ft and p a rts ............................ P ro fe ssio n a l and s c ie n tif ic in stru m en ts ....................................... O ther m anufacturing ......................... Nonm anufacturing ................................ Commercial c o n su ltin g firm s . . . . N onprofit re se a rc h agen cies . . . . O ther nonm anufacturing ................... A ll siz e s of companies ....................... Less than 500 e m p lo y e e s............ 500 - 4->999 employees ..................... 5,000 o r more employees ................ 1/ 95,694 83,772 H,032 4,954 1,810 2,562 5,891 17,375 3,072 20,235 5,758 8,083 11,922 3,803 3,421 4,698 1/ 95,694 10,999 20,499 64,196 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 P ercen t employed. on — Government c o n tra c ts NonPrime Sub govern ment T otal con con tr a c ts tr a c ts work By in d u stry 48.9 48.9 5.4 4.5 10.0 39.9 24.5 60.2 23.1 92.1 69*6 24.5 49.2 43.4 5.5 51.1 4 3.7 5.2 51.1 4 .7 3.9 7.2 23.2 .7 94.6 95.5 90.0 60.1 75.5 39.8 16.8 53.0 20.3 86.3 61.1 20.0 100.0 a .4 65.8 45.8 100.0 100.0 53.0 50.1 100.0 35.4 33-6 B. By siz e o f company 100.0 48.9 43.4 100.0 58.7 43.0 100.0 47.9 38.6 100.0 49.3 46.8 .6 2.8 16.7 7.7 7.2 2*8 5.8 8.5 4.5 7.8 76.9 7.9 30.4 75.5 50.8 34.2 47.0 20.0 2.9 1.8 64.6 5.5 51.1 15.7 9.3 2.5 a .3 52.1 50.7 1 / Inclu des e stim a te s fo r 134. companies th a t f a ile c to re p o rt th e number o f research eng in eers and s c ie n tis ts employed. Although exact numbers a re g iven , n o t a l l d ig its o f th e numbers are s t a t i s t i c a l l y s ig n if ic a n t. 11 The proportion of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts was lowest in the following industries: Food and kindred products (l percent); paper {b percent); petroleum refining (5 percent); and chemicals (5 percent). Characteristically, many companies in these industries prefer to finance their own re search programs in order to insure secrecy of development and to take advantage of future production contracts. However, by independently undertaking research work of types needed by the Federal Government, these industries have participated in defense research to a greater extent than the percentages-cited above would indicate. Furthermore, since the chemicals industry has a very large research staff, the actual number of research engineers and scientists employed on Government contracts was greater in this industry than in some others (for example, fabricated metal products) where the proportion on Government work was much higher. The extent to which small business enterprises participate in Government contracts is a matter which has received considerable public attention. This survey indicates that the proportion of the professional research staff assigned to Government-financed projects was, on the average, slightly higher in small than in large companies. Firms with fewer than 500 employees reported that three-fifths of their research engineers and scientists were on Government work, whereas the figure for larger organizations was about one-half (table 2). However, the absolute number of research engineers and scientists on Government research projects was much greater in large than in small companies. Most of the research work for Federal agencies was done on contracts let directly b y these agencies. Forty-three percent of the research engineers and scientists in the survey were working on Government prime contracts, as compared with 6 percent who were on subcontracts. Government research projects often require such expensive equipment and such large specialized staffs that only large companies can undertake them. However, many.phases of such projects can be handled effectively by smaller organizations on a subcontract basis. As expected, the survey showed that the proportion of all research engineers and scientists working on Government subcontracts was higher in small than in large companies— 1 5 .7 percent in those with less than 500 employees, compared with 9*3 percent in those with 500 to U ,999 workers and 2.5 percent in still larger organizations. An unanticipated finding is the much higher proportion of research engineers and scientists working on Government prime contracts than on subcontracts even in organizations with less than 500 employees (table 2 ). Commercial consulting firms had the highest proportion of professional research staff employed on Government subcontracts (20 percent). Nevertheless, such firms had more than twice as many pro fessional research workers on Government prime contracts as on sub contracts . 12 In the fabricated metal products industry, subcontracts were of greater relative importance than in any other branch of manufac turing having a sizable amount of Government research. 8/ Seventeen percent of the research engineers and scientists in this industry were employed on Government subcontracts— owing to the substantial number of small firms in the industry and the high proportion of the research staffs of these small companies engaged in research work for the Government. The manufacturing industries which employed the largest absolute numbers of research engineers and scientists on subcontracts were those with the largest research staffs— aircraft and electrical machinery (table 2). CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT, JANUARY 1951 TO JANUARY 1952 Employment of research engineers and scientists rose sub stantially during 1951 , a year of rapid expansion in the defense program. The companies in the survey increased their employment of professional research personnel by nearly one-fourth between January 1951 and January 1952— from an estimated 77,*+00 to about 95,700. Every industry for which information is available expanded its research staff to some extent during the year (tables C-ll and C-12). As would be expected, however, the industries most intensively engaged in defense research reported the greatest increases in employ ment of research personnel, in both percentage and absolute terms (chart 3)* In the aircraft industry, employment of research engineers and scientists increased by nearly 50 percent over the 12-month period. In the electrical machinery and professional and scientific instruments industries, it rose by 28 percent. The smallest relative increase (6 percent) occurred in the petroleum industry (table 3)• The part which the defense program played in the expansion of research staffs is shown still more clearly by figures on the change in employment on Government and nongovernment research work. The number of research engineers and scientists doing Governmentfinanced research rose by 52 percent between January 1951 and January 1952 in all industries taken together, whereas the number on non government research work increased by only 5 percent. Employment of research engineers and scientists on subcontracts rose relatively more (5 8 percent) than employment on prime contracts (5 1 percent), but the actual number of men added was much greater on prime con tracts than on subcontracts (table C-13). 8/ See table C-9It will be noted from this table that the average number of research engineers and scientists on Government subcontracts per 100 on all Government contracts was higher in the paper and the paint industries than in fabricated metal products. However, the total number of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts was very small in these industries. 13 Table 3 . Percent change in employment o f research engin eers and s c ie n t is t s on Government and nongovernment work, January 1951 to January 1952,. by ind u stry and by s iz e o f company Item E ngineers and s c i e n t is t s employed on — A ll en g in eers and s c i e n t is t s Government c o n tr a c ts Other work Number P ercen t change, Number P ercent change, Number P ercent change; reported, Jan. 1951 to rep orted , Jan. 1951 to rep orted, Jan. 1951 to Jan. 1952 Jan. 1952 Jan. 1952 J a n .1952 J a n .1952 J a n .1952 A. By in d u str y 1 /9 5 ,6 9 4 2 3 .7 1 / 45,445 5 2 .0 1 /5 0 ,2 4 9 5 .1 83,772 2 3 .3 39,4 6 7 5 2 .2 44,305 5 .1 Chem icals and a l li e d produ cts . . . . Petroleum r e f i n i n g ...................... Primary m etal in d u str ie s .................... F ab ricated m etal products ................. M achinery (excep t e le c t r ic a l) . . . . E le c tr ic a l machinery ............................. Motor v e h ic le s and equipm ent .......... A ir c r a ft and p a rts .................................. P r o fe ssio n a l and s c i e n t if i c in stru m en ts ............................................ Other m anufacturing ...................... 14,032 4 ,9 5 4 1,810 2,562 5,391 17,375 3 ,072 20,235 1 0 .8 5 .7 9 .5 2 0 .8 1 4 .7 2 7 .5 1 0 .9 4 8 .5 802 69.8 8 .6 5 .6 1 0 .1 5,758 8,083 Nonmanufacturing ............................................ Commercial c o n su ltin g firm s ............ N on p rofit research a g e n c ie s ............. Other nonm anufacturing ......................... A ll in d u str ie s ................................................ M anufacturing .............................................. 223 181 1 ,0 2 2 1,443 10,460 710 18,636 8 .7 5 .7 4 4 .6 7 4 .2 5 4 .0 1 0 4 .0 5 2 .8 13,230 4 ,7 3 1 1 ,6 2 9 1 ,5 4 0 4 ,4 4 3 6 ,9 1 5 2 ,362 1 ,5 9 9 3 .2 1 .2 - 2 .5 1 1 .9 4 ,1 3 9 1 ,851 44*2 4 0 .7 1 ,6 1 9 6 ,2 3 2 - 6 .4 6 .1 11,922 28 .3 1 2 .8 2 3 .2 5,978 5 0 .8 5,944 5 .3 3,303 3 ,421 4 ,6 9 8 3 1 .5 2 4 .9 1 6 .8 2,502 1,813 1,663 5 2 .9 3 1 .2 6 6 .8 1 ,3 0 1 1,608 3 ,0 3 5 3 .2 1 8 .4 .3 8 .4 B. By s iz e o f company A ll s iz e s o f companies ............................. 1 /9 5 ,6 9 4 2 3 .7 1/ 45,445 5 2 .0 1 /5 0 ,2 4 9 5 .1 Less than $00 em ployees ...................... 500 - 4 ,9 9 9 em ployees ...................... 5,000 or more ............................................. 10,999 2 0 ,499 64,196 3 3 .4 2 2 .3 2 3 .0 6,085 5 8 .9 4 2 .1 5 4 .8 4 ,9 1 4 11,182 34,153 1 1 .3 9 .6 4 .2 9 ,3 1 7 30,043 1 / In clu d es e stim a te s fo r 134. companies th a t f a ile d to rep ort the number o f research en g in eers and s c i e n t is t s em ployed. Although e x a ct numbers are g iv en , n ot a l l d ig it s o f the numbers are s t a t i s t i c a l l y s ig n if ic a n t . Ik Despite the rapid expansion in employment on Government research contracts, most industries achieved some increase during the year in the number of research engineers and scientists working on company-financed research. In one industry, primary metals, the gain in employment on nongovernment research (10 percent) exceeded that on Government work (6 percent). The motor vehicle and professional and scientific instruments industries were the only ones that experienced a net decline in employment on nongovernment research— no doubt owing largely to a shifting of personnel to defense work for the Federal Government. 15 The relative increase in size of professional research staff during 1951 was greater in small than in large companies. Firms with fever than 500 employees in January 1952 had increased their employ ment of research engineers and scientists by 33 percent daring the preceding year. In contrast, organizations with 500 to *+,999 em ployees experienced a 22 -percent increase in staff and those with 5,000 or more employees a 2 3 -percent increase. Since this survey was concerned with industrial research and development work only, the findings do not indicate the overall trend in employment of engineers and scientists during 1951• The large expansion in industrial research and development staffs which occurred during the year may well have been achieved in part by transfers of personnel from production work and other types of activ ities, as well as by an influx of new engineering and science grad uates. 16 SU PPO R T IN G PERSONNEL DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYMENT Research engineers and scientists axe assisted by draftsmen, laboratory assistants, other technicians, skilled craftsmen, and ad ministrative, clerical, and maintenance personnel. These "supporting personnel" include all employees, except the engineers and scientists, who do work connected with research and development programs (includ ing a proportionate share of overhead personnel). The companies in the study employed about 143,000 supporting workers— half again as large a number as the total of 95,700 research engineers and scientists. Nearly fifty-five percent of the supporting personnel, as of the engineers and scientists, were in three indus tries --electrical machinery, aircraft, and chemicals. In some indus tries, however, there were marked differences in the relative numbers of workers in these two occupational categories. For example, elec trical machinery manufacturers were the largest employers of support ing workers, but the aircraft industry led in employment of research engineers and scientists (table C-2). The motor vehicle industry em ployed about three times as large a proportion of the supporting per sonnel in the survey as of the professional research workers. The concentration of employment in the largest firms was even greater in the case of supporting workers than of their profes sional colleagues. Twenty-four percent of the supporting workers and 14 percent of the research engineers and scientists were employed by the seven reporting companies with 100,000 or more employees (table C-3). An analysis of the distribution of employment among companies with professional research staffs of different sizes shows the same high concentration of supporting personnel in a few organizations with very large programs (table C-4). SUPPORT RATIOS During the current period of manpower shortages in engineer ing and the sciences, the possibility of expanding supporting staffs in order to utilize professional personnel more efficiently has been widely discussed. The "support ratio"— that is, the number of sup porting workers employed per research engineer or scientist— has b e come a matter of great interest and importance in research management. Detailed data on support ratios have therefore been compiled for com panies that supplied information on the size of both their professional and their supporting staffs. purposes. These data are of two types, which are useful for different The average support ratios, presented first, summarize the 17 experience of all companies in a given industry or size group. 9/ They would be the best measures to use, for example, in estimating overall requirements for supporting personnel in connection with defense plan ning. Companies interested in comparing their own support ratios with those of other companies in the same industry and size group will, how ever, find the median and quartile ratios most useful. Average Support Ratios The average support ratio for all companies in the survey was 1.5 in January 1952, but the support ratio varied widely among industries. Motor vehicle manufacturers had by far the highest aver age number of supporting workers per research engineer or scientist (5-2). The electrical machinery industry came next, with a ratio of 2.0. The industries with the lowest ratio (0.7) were those manufac turing transportation equipment other than motor vehicles and aircraft and those making "other chemical products" (table C-l4). When the companies were classified according to size, the average support ratio was found to increase from 0 .9 for those with less than 500 employees to 1.3 for those with 500 to 4,999 employees and 1.6 for those with 5 >000 or more employees. 10/ Statistical analyses show that the variations in the companies’ support ratios were even more closely related to differences in company size than to industry differences. 11/ In general, firms with large staffs have apparently found it feasible to have greater specialization of per sonnel than is practicable in smaller organizations. The relatively low support ratios of the small companies probably also reflect the fact that such firms often contract out much of their subprofessional work to drafting firms and machine shops, since their volume of work does not warrant the maintenance of a staff to perform these service functions-. Ratios for January 1951> comparable to those for January 1952 already presented, show that the average support ratio for all report ing companies was the same (1 .5 ) in both these months. In more than half of the industries for which separate figures are available, no change in the average ratios occurred over the year, and in all other 9/ The average ratios were computed by dividing the aggregate number of supporting personnel on the payrolls of the given group of companies by the aggregate number of research engineers and scien tists in their employ. Throughout the report, the terms "average" and "mean" denote statistics computed by this method. 10/ A classification of the firms by size of professional re search staffs shows a similar direct relationship between the support ratio and the size of the research program (table C-15). 11/ This conclusion is supported by analysis of variance tests. A memorandum describing the results of these tests has been prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and will be available upon request. 18 industries, the increase or decrease was small. Apparently, there was no significant increase in utilization of supporting personnel during 1951, despite the shortage of engineers and scientists. In this sur vey, no information was obtained as to the number of companies which considered that they were already employing as many supporting workers as they could utilize efficiently, nor as to the number which would have liked to expand their supporting staffs but were unable to do so because of labor shortages. Median and Quartile Support Ratios The extremely wide range in the support ratios of individual companies is shown in chart U. Half the companies in the survey re ported that the number of supporting workers per research engineer or scientist in their employ was 0.8 or less, but a few firms had support ratios many times as high as this median figure. 12/ AVERAGE NUMBER OF SUPPORTING WORKERS PER RESEARCH ENGINEER OR SCIENTIST WAS LESS THAN ONE IN OVER HALF THE COMPANIES-- MUCH HIGHER IN A FEW N u m b er o f 0 1.0 u n it e d s t a t e s d e p a r t m e n t BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS of 2.0 labo r 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 A v e r a g e N u m b er of S u p p o rtin g W ork ers P er R esea rch E n g in eer or S c ie n tis t, J a n u a ry 1952 , a0 9.0 10.0 12/ The median ratio is the value for the middle company, in a ranking of the companies in order of the size of their support ratios. 19 The average support ratio for all firms in the survey, as indicated in the last section, was 1.5* There are two reasons why the average was so much larger than the median ratio: (1) The ex tremely high support ratios reported by a few companies; and (2 ) the fact that, in most industries, large companies usually had higher ra tios than small companies. Both these factors raised the average ra tios but did not affect the medians. They are responsible similarly for the substantial difference between the mean (or average) and the median ratios for practically every industry and company size group (table C-14). The variation in support ratios among companies should be taken into account by any concern wishing to compare its own employ ment pattern with the survey findings. A ranking of the companies according to the size of their support ratios shows a relatively wide range in ratios even for concerns in the middle half of the distribu tion— from 0.3 (the lower quartile) to 1.5 (the upper quartile). The range between these two figures (the interquartile range) for compa nies in a particular industry and size group was somewhat narrower in most cases. Though influenced by both company size and industry, the support ratios in individual organizations apparently depended even more on factors such as varying company personnel policies, the exact nature of the research program, and the availability of technicians in the locality. In a number of industries, companies with fewer than 500 employees had a lower-quartile support ratio of zero. This means that at least one-fourth of the companies in these categories re ported no employment of supporting workers. 13 / 13 / The companies which reported that they employed no support ing workers generally had very small research programs. In such organizations, the entire staff involved in research activities may have consisted of professional workers, or, if the company conducting the research program had some other major business, the assistance given the research staff by administrative and other overhead person nel may have been so slight as to be negligible when translated into "full-time equivalent" terms. However, erroneous reporting (misclassification of personnel or failure to count overhead personnel as sup porting workers) apparently accounted for the "0" support ratio in some cases. 20 COST OF RESEARCH DISTRIBUTION OF RESEARCH COST The two basic yardsticks used to gauge the size of a re search program are dollars and numbers of employees. These two meas ures yield similar findings as to the relative magnitude of different programs, since personnel expenses form a sizable proportion of the total cost of research and development projects. The electrical machinery, aircraft, and chemicals indus tries, which led in employment of research personnel, also had the highest total research costs (table C-l6). They accounted for 5^ percent of the total 1951 cost of research and development reported by the companies in this survey. Furthermore, they employed in January 1952, as previously noted, 5k percent of the research engi neers and scientists. In most individual industries, the cost and employment per centages did not agree as closely as these combined totals (table C- 2 ) . However, a wide difference was found only in the motor vehicle indus try. In dollars, the research and development program of this indus try amounted to about 11 percent of the total for all companies in the study and was nearly as large as that of the chemicals industry. Nevertheless, motor vehicle manufacturers employed only about one out of every 30 research engineers and scientists. The major reason for the higher proportion of total costs than of research engineers and scientists in this industry was its relatively high support ratio. The concentration of research and development activity in the largest companies was greater when measured in terms of financial outlay than is indicated by the employment data (table C-17). The seven companies in the survey which employed 100 ,00§ or more employees were responsible for 26 percent of the 1951 cost, compared with l1*percent of the research engineers and scientists employed in January 1952. In contrast, the 1,339 organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees accounted for only 12 percent of the cost and 18 percent of the research engineers and scientists (table C- 3 ). A classification of the companies by the size of their pro fessional research staffs likewise shows a higher concentration of research costs than of employment in the largest organizations, al though the differential is less. The 18 reporting companies with 1,000 or more research engineers and scientists accounted for UU per cent of the cost of research, compared with 37 percent of the engi neering and scientific employment. Conversely, the 1,82U concerns with a total professional research staff of less than 125 did only 21 percent of the research, measured in dollars, but employed 29 percent of the research engineers and scientists (table C-U). The explanation of these findings, as of that for the motor vehicle industry, lies in the support ratios. Since the number of supporting workers employed 275235 0-53-3 21 per research engineer or scientist tended to he higher in large than in small organizations (p. 18 ), the large concerns had a higher per centage of the total cost than of the professional research personnel. RESEARCH FINANCED BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Government-Financed Research as Percent of Total Research Cost The Federal Government paid for nearly half of the total cost of industrial research and development work performed in this country during 1951. This corresponds closely with the proportion of research engineers and scientists working on Government contracts at the beginning of 1952. About 97 percent of the cost of federally financed research was on work for the Department of Defense or the Atomic Energy Commission. The predominance of Government-financed research in indus tries directly related to national defense, and above all in aircraft manufacturing, is evident from the cost data shown in chart 5 (as also from the information on employment of research engineers and scien tists on p a g e d ) . Eighty-five percent of the aircraft industry’s 22 1951 research and development cost was on Government contracts. The Government also financed half or more of the research done by the professional and scientific instruments and electrical machinery in dustries and by commercial consulting and nonprofit research organi zations (table b ) . In contrast, the chemicals and petroleum indus tries themselves financed all but 7 percent and 3 percent, respec tively, of their total research and development cost. These indus tries have, however, contributed to defense research to a greater extent than the percentages suggest, since part of their companyfinanced research activity has had a bearing on defense problems. The motor vehicle industry also had a large research and development program financed to only a small extent by the Government. Only 9 percent of the cost of research in this industry during 1951 was on Government contracts, fiowever, 23 percent of the industry’s research and development engineers and scientists were employed on Government projects. This difference reflects the fact that, in the motor vehicle industry, the average cost of research per engineer or scientist was lower on Government than on other work (p. 3*0. 1^/ Government-financed research was of somewhat greater rela tive importance in small than in large companies (table C-l8). Nearly three-fifths of the cost of research performed by concerns with less than 500 employees was incurred on Government contracts, whereas in larger organizations the proportion was almost one-half. Nevertheless, the total dollar cost of Government research carried out by the companies with 5,000 or more employees far exceeded the total cost of the work done by the much greater number of smaller companies. 15 / When the data are classified according to the size of the companies’ professional research staffs, the Government’s share of the research and development cost was highest in large organizations, in percentage as well as absolute terms. Fifty-five percent of the cost of research done by companies with 500 or more research engi neers and scientists was for work on Government contracts, compared lb/ In certain industries, other than motor vehicles, lesser differences were found between the percent of research cost on Govern ment contracts and the proportion of research engineers and scientists employed on such work (as may be seen by comparing the figures in tables 2 and *+). These differences can, in some instances, be traced to the same type of cost differential as was noted in the motor vehicle industry, but they were also due in part to other factors. The two sets of figures do not refer to exactly the same period of time. Fur thermore, the two sets of data were, of necessity, based on somewhat different groups of companies, since some of those sending in ques tionnaires did not supply information on employment while others failed to furnish cost data. 15/ These findings agree closely with those regarding the em ployment of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts (p. 12). 23 Table 1*. Cost of research on Government prime contracts and sub contracts as percent of total research cost, by industry and by size of company, 195>1 Item E stim ated c o st o f re se a rc h re p o rte d (m illio n s) P ercen t o f re se a rc h c o st on —Government c o n tra c ts NonA ll Prime Sub govern types T o tal con con of ment tr a c ts tr a c ts work work A. By in d u stry A ll in d u s trie s .............................................. 1/&1>980 M anufacturing ................................................ Chemicals and a llie d products . . . . Petroleum re fin in g ................................ Prim ary m etal in d u s trie s ................... F ab ricated m etal products ................ M achinery (except e l e c t r i c a l ) ............ E le c tric a l m achinery ............................ Motor v e h ic le s and equipment .......... A irc ra ft and p a rts ................................ P ro fe ssio n a l and s c ie n tif ic in stru m en ts ......................................... O ther m anufacturing .............................. Nonm anufacturing ......................................... 1,791 221 Commercial c o n su ltin g firm s ............ N onprofit re se a rc h agen cies ............ O ther nonm anufacturing ....................... 50 39 100 A ll siz e s of companies ............................ Less th an 500 employees ................... 500 - 4,999 employees ................... 5,000 o r more employees ..................... 98 37 a 104 437 214 411 93 135 189 1/ 1,980 146 346 1,488 100.0 46.8 42.5 4 .3 53.2 100.0 46.4 42.4 4 .0 53.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7 .1 3 .1 9 .5 3 1 .1 23.8 57.0 9 .4 8 5.1 6 .5 2 .7 7 .0 100.0 100.0 5 7.3 1 9 .7 100.0 50.6 18.9 16.6 53.7 9 .1 79.2 49.8 5.1 43.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 65 .4 53.2 42 .9 49.3 50.3 38.7 6 .9 16.1 2 .9 4 .2 B_.....By siz e o f company 46.8 100.0 42.5 57.6 100.0 42.0 100.0 49.9 4 0 .9 100.0 4 5 .1 43.3 4-3 15.6 9 .0 1.8 .6 .4 2 .5 12.2 7 .2 3 .3 .3 5.9 7.5 4.6 1 / Includes e stim a te s fo r 181 companies th a t f a ile d to re p o rt c o st o f re se a rc h . E stim ates are rounded to th e n e a re s t m illio n . 2k 92.9 96.9 90.5 68.9 76.2 43.0 90.6 14.9 42.7 80.3 4 9 .4 34-6 46.8 57.1 53.2 42 .4 50.1 54.9 with about forty percent or less of the cost reported by companies with smaller research staffs (table C- 19 ). The high figure for large organizations resulted mainly from large Government research con tracts in the aircraft and electrical machinery industries. Even in small companies, Government-sponsored research was conducted mainly on contracts made directly with Federal agencies. In firms with less than 500 employees, the total cost of research on Government prime contracts was nearly three times as great as that of work on subcontracts (table k ) . In companies with 500 to ^,999 em ployees, the corresponding ratio was about 5 to 1 and in those with 5,000 or more employees, nearly 25 to 1. 16 / The proportion of research cost in different industries incurred on Government subcontracts is shown in table U. These data, like the figures on employment of research engineers and scientists, indicate that subcontracts were of greatest relative importance in the fabricated metal products industry and in commercial consulting organizations. They also show that the dollar value of research work done on subcontracts was greatest in the aircraft industry, which in cludes many small manufacturers of aircraft parts as well as large companies producing complete aircraft or engines. Paid;icipation of Individual Companies in Government Research The percentages cited so far are a measure of the extent to which the research and development facilities of different industries and of companies in different size groups were utilized on Governmentsponsored research during 1951- To indicate how Government contracts were distributed among individual companies, information has been compiled also on the percentage of the total research cost of each company which was Government-financed. About Uo percent of the companies in the survey did no Government research during 1951. In several industries, including chemicals and petroleum refining, the proportion of companies without Government research contracts exceeded 50 percent. At the other ex treme were the aircraft manufacturers, more than half of which did research only on Government contracts during 1951• In three out of every four companies in this industry, Government-financed research accounted for 83 percent or more of the total 1951 cost of the com pany’s research activities. In most industries, however, there was wide variation among companies in the degree of participation in Government research. More than one-fourth of the electrical machinery companies, for 16/ These findings also correspond with those based on infor mation regarding employment of professional research personnel (p. 12). 25 example, did research only on Government contracts during 1951 > whereas another fourth reported that the cost of their Governmentsponsored research amounted to only 23 percent or less of their 1951 research cost. The variation was most extreme among the manufac turers of "other transportation equipment" and the commercial con sulting firms. Over a fourth of the organizations in "both these groups did no Government research at all, though a similar proportion conducted research only on Government contracts (table C-l8). RESEARCH COST AS A PERCENT OF SALES Administrators in charge of research programs often rely in part on certain rule-of-thumb relationships in the planning and budg eting of their programs. The ratio of research cost to value of sales is one of the most important of these relationships. The present report contains two types of data on this sub ject: (l) Overall percentages for different industries and for com panies of different sizes; 1 jJ and (2) median and quartile ratios derived from percentages for individual companies. A businessman interested in comparing the ratio of research cost to value of sales in his own organization with comparable figures for other companies will find the median and quartile ratios most suited to his purpose. The overall percentages are, however, a better indication of the degree of emphasis on research and development in different indus tries— insofar as this can be determined from a survey limited to companies having research and development programs. Average Ratios The cost of research performed during 1951 by the companies in this survey amounted to about 2 percent of the total value of their sales (or services, in the case of research and consulting organiza tions not producing a physical product). The percent varied widely among industries. Aircraft companies had a far higher figure (13 per cent) than any other branch of manufacturing, owing primarily to the many large Government research contracts in this industry and to the fact that, in 1951 > mass production of military aircraft was just beginning. The next highest figure for a manufacturing industry (6 percent) was found in the electrical machinery and the professional and scientific instruments industries. These industries also had large defense contracts, but the proportion of research performed for the Government was considerably lower there than in aircraft manufac- 17/ The overall percentages were computed by dividing the total research cost for the companies in the specified industry or size group by the total value of their sales. 26 turing. At the low end of the scale were the petroleum refining, primary and fabricated metals, and "other" manufacturing industries, where research costs amounted to less than 1 percent of sales (chart 6). However, the total value of sales in these industries was so great that even this low percentage represented a sizable dollar volume of research (chart 5). Chart 6 COST OF RESEARCH AS PERCENT OF SALES WAS HIGHEST IN INDUSTRIES WITH LARGE DEFENSE CONTRACTS Percent of Cost 1951 Research Cost Financed by Industry Government and as rercent or oaies by Private Industry AIRCRAFT ELECTRICALMACHINERY © PROFESSIONAL AND ENTS SCIENTIFIC INSTRUM G o v e rn m ent 15 ”1 P r iv a t e In d u s tr y © © m © m © © © CHEMICALS M(Except ACHINERY Electrical) MOTOR VEHICLES PRIM ARYANDMETALS FABRICATED PETROLEUMREFINING OTHER MANUFACTURING NONMANUFACTURING Source: Tables C-18 and C-20 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS In all nonmanufacturing industries taken together, the ratio of research cost to sales or services was 1.8 percent, close to the average for all industries (tables C-20 and C-21). The overall ratio for nonmanufacturing organizations reflects primarily the situation in the telecommunications industry, which accounted for most of the research spending by nonmanufacturing concerns. Nonprofit research agencies and commercial research services— with research costs amounting to 90 and ^7 percent, respec tively, of the total value of services rendered— were also included in the nonmanufacturing category. In both these types of organiza tions, research and development is the major business, not a support ing activity as in manufacturing and telecommunications. However, the total cost of the research performed b y these organizations was too small to have much effect on the average ratio for all nonmanu facturing concerns. 27 Small companies tended to have a higher ratio of research cost to value of sales than large organizations. Those with fewer than 500 employees reported a research cost amounting to about 7 per cent of their total sales, whereas the comparable figure for larger companies was about 2 percent. 18/ These data, of course, relate only to companies having industrial research programs. If the survey had covered all industrial concerns, including those without research activities, the finding would undoubtedly have been reversed, since relatively few small companies conduct research. 19 / Median and Quartile Ratios The relationship between the cost of research in a particu lar company and that company's total value of sales is the net result of a great number of factors— for example, the products manufactured by the company, its degree of integration, the size of its defense contracts if any, its financial resources and competitive situation, and the policy of the management. The interplay of these factors leads to great variation among companies in the ratio of research cost to sales. One-fourth of the manufacturing companies in the study had ratios of 0.8 percent, or less, whereas another fourth had ratios of 5-6 percent or more. Thus, even if one considers only the companies in the middle half of the distribution, the ratios are found to have a wide range— from 0.8 to 5.6 percent (the upper and lower quartiles). In some branches of manufacturing the interquartile range was narrower than this (table C-20). In petroleum refining, for example, the lower quartile was 0.4 percent and the upper quartile was 1.5 percent. On the other hand, in the professional and scien tific instruments industry the range was from 3-^ to 20.0 percent; in aircraft and parts, from 3.2 to 18.8 percent, in electrical machinery, from 1.9 to 11.1 percent. The extremely wide range in ratios in these three industries undoubtedly reflects, to some degree, the con trasting situation in companies with large defense research contracts and those that did not hold such contracts. 18/ It will be recalled that research cost as a percent of sales for all companies in the survey taken together was also 2 per cent. The total value of sales of companies with fewer than 500 em ployees was so small, relative to the sales of larger companies, that their experience had a negligible effect on the overall average. 19 / This survey included approximately 1 out of every 5 manu facturing companies with 500 or more employees but only about 1 out of 350 manufacturing concerns with fewer than 500 employees. In all size groups, the organizations in the survey are believed to repre sent the majority of all those conducting industrial research, al though the coverage of large organizations was better than that of smaller organizations. 28. These findings show that no one figure adequately portrays the relationship between research cost and value of sales in an in dustry. The median ratios do, however, provide a more typical pic ture of the relationship, as it exists in individual companies, than do the averages discussed in the preceding section. In manufacturing as a whole, the average and median percen tages were the same (2 percent), hut the two statistics differed markedly in some industries. In the professional and scientific instruments industry, for example, the average ratio was 6 percent, whereas the median ratio (which, by definition, was equalled or e x ceeded by the ratios for half of the reporting companies) was 8 per cent. The reasons for this difference is made plain by the cost ratios for companies of various sizes. The small instrument manufac turers tended to have higher ratios of research cost to sales than the large ones, and there were so many small companies that their cost ratios largely determined the median. The few large companies, however, had a much greater total value of sales than the small firms, and their ratios, therefore, mainly determined the average. In aircraft manufacturing, on the other hand, the statis tical picture was reversed— the average ratio for the industry (13 percent) was more than half again as high as the median ratio of 8 percent. Here, the explanation lies in the very high ratios of re search cost to sales in a few big aircraft companies holding large defense contracts and the lower ratios reported b y the greater number of small companies. For commercial consulting firms the median ratio of research cost to value of services was 77 percent. For nonprofit research agencies it was 100 percent, indicating that at least half the organi zations in this category were engaged wholly in research during 1951 . In contrast, the median ratio for companies in telecommunications and other nonmanufacturing industries was only about 3 percent. The total number of such companies in the study was very small, however, much smaller than the number of consulting and nonprofit organiza tions. Consequently, the latter organizations mainly determined the very high median ratio (67 percent) for all nonmanufacturing firms. 29 RESEARCH COST PER W ORKER Ratios of research cost to research personnel serve a vari ety of purposes. They are valuable to companies or Government agencies concerned vith setting cost standards for their own research activities or those of their contractors. They can also be used to estimate the total cost of employing a specified number of research workers or, con versely, to estimate the personnel required to perform a research pro ject of a given dollar size. Cost per research engineer or scientist is the ratio most useful for some purposes; other purposes are better served by cost data related to total research employment. This report, therefore, presents both kinds of information. As in preceding sections of the report, two types of statistics are given: (1) Average ratios for all companies in different industries and size groups— the figures best adapted for use, for example, in estimating personnel require ments, and (2) median and quartile ratios, which portray the cost ex perience of individual companies. COST PER RESEARCH ENGINEER OR SCIENTIST 20/ Average Cost Ratios The average cost per research engineer or scientist was $21,900 in 1951 in all industries taken together. Of the nine branches of manufacturing shown in chart 7, the one with the lowest cost per research engineer or scientist ($16 ,500 ) was the chemicals industry. The highest average cost--$68,600--was that for the motor vehicle industry. This was more than twice the $28,000 for the elec trical machinery, the next highest ratio. Differing support ratios largely explain these variations in average cost. As noted earlier, the motor vehicle industry employed a much larger number of support ing workers, relative to the number of research engineers and scien tists, than any other branch of manufacturing, whereas the chemicals industry had a rather low support ratio. Commercial consulting firms and nonprofit research agencies had an average cost per research engineer or scientist of $ 15,100 and $12,k00, respectively. In telecommunications and other nonmanufactur ing industries, however, the average cost was $23,300, slightly above the $22,500 average for all manufacturing industries. 20/ Operating cost of all research and development divided by the average of the January 1951 and January 1952 employment of re search engineers and scientists. 30 The cost per engineer or scientist also varied directly vith the size of the company (chart 8). Thus, the average ratio for compa nies with less than 500 employees was $14,800, compared with $18,100 for those with 500 to 4,999 employees, and $24,300 for larger organiza tions (table C-23). A classification of the companies by the size of their research staffs shows a similar relationship— rising cost ratios with increasing research staffs (table C-23). Since support ratios tended to be higher in large than in small organizations, they help to account for the variation in cost among companies in different size groups as well as among those in different industries. 21/ 21/ Statistical tests show that about 40 percent of the total variation in average cost per research engineer or scientist among the surveyed companies was accounted for by variation in the support ratio. The differences in average cost among industries and company size groups were also highly significant. A memorandum describing the analysis of covariance test on which these conclusions are based has been prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and will be available upon request. 31 Chart 8. LARGE COMPANIES HAVE HIGHER AVERAGE COST PER RESEARCH WORKER THAN SMALL COMPANIES Averaae Cost Average Cost Per Researcn w orK er, 1951 Per Research Engineer or Scientist, 1951 Thousands of Dollars thousands of Dollars Source:- Tables C-22 and C-26 Median and Quartile Cost Ratios Chart 9 depicts the survey findings with respect to average cost per research engineer or scientist in individual companies. A few companies reported an extremely high cost, exceeding $ 60,000 in some instances, but half of the companies had a cost of $ 13,500 or less. This median figure was only three-fifths of the average cost per research engineer or scientist for all companies in the study ($21,900). Median cost was lower than average cost in practically every industry and company size group (table C-22). The reasons for these differences are the same as for the similar differences discussed in earlier sections of the report 22/--namely, that a few companies had very high costs and that, in general, large companies reported the high est cost figures. In any comparison of the survey findings with the cost expe rience of a specific company, the wide range in cost per research en gineer or scientist among the reporting companies should be borne in mind. When these companies are ranked in order of their average costs, the range for organizations in the middle half of the distribution is 22/ See pp. 20 and 28 . 32 found to be from $8,900 to $ 20,500 (the lower and upper quartiles). Comparable figures for different Industries and company size groups are presented in table C-22. In some industries the interquartile range was narrower than it was for all companies in the survey, but in other industries it was wider. In the chemicals industry, for ex ample, the range wa3 from $7,500 to $16,100 and in petroleum refining from $12,500 to $19,700. In contrast, in the motor vehicle industry the lower quartile was $14,900 and the upper quartile $65,900. Obviously, the cost per research engineer or scientist in individual companies is greatly influenced by other factors as well as industry and company size. Foremost among these other influences is the extent of utilization of supporting personnel, a particularly important factor in the motor vehicle industry. Other factors which contributed to the variation in costs include differences in annual charges for facilities, equipment and supplies, and wage and salary differentials. COST PER RESEARCH ENGINEER OR SCIENTIST ON GOVERNMENT-FINANCED RESEARCH The research which industry conducted for the Federal Gov ernment during 1951 cost $23,900 per research engineer or scientist employed. This average figure, which included work on both prime 33 contracts and subcontracts, was higher by $2,000 than the overall average for both Government and nongovernment work (table 5) • In some industries, Government-sponsored research involved a lower average cost and, in others, a higher average cost than the research financed by the companies themselves. In still other indus tries no significant difference was found. Aircraft manufacturers, for example, had an average cost per research engineer or scientist of about $2^,000 on all their research work and also on Government contracts alone. In the chemicals industry, on the other hand, the cost figure for Government-sponsored research was slightly over $22,000, about $6,000 more than the average for all research ac tivities in these industries. In sharp contrast are the findings for the motor vehicle industry, where the average'cost per research engineer or scientist on Government work (approximately $3^,000) was only half as great as the average for both Government and non government projects. The information obtained in connection with this survey does not provide a basis for any detailed analysis of the reasons for these differences. Since many of the companies in the survey had no Government contracts, the cost figures for Government research do not reflect the experience of all the companies included in the overall figures for both Government and nongovernment work. More important, however, is the fact that the types of research done for Government have often differed basically from those conducted by the same company on its own funds. COST PER RESEARCH WORKER 2^/ When research cost is related to (including supporting personnel as well as the result is a series of ratios which are less variable than the ratios discussed in total research employment engineers and scientist), not only lower but much the preceding sections. The average cost per research worker for all companies was $8,800 in 1951* Among the industries shown in chart 7, average cost ranged from $ 7,500 for professional and scientific instruments manu facturers to $10,900 for motor vehicle companies. Data for companies of different sizes show a moderate increase in average costs, from 23 / Operating cost of all research and development divided by the average of the January 1951 and January 1952 employment of all research workers. Table 5» Average cost per research engineer or scientist on all research and on Government-financed research, by industry, 1951 1/ All research Industry Governmentfinanced research 2 t All industries .......................... 121,900 ♦23,900 Manufacturing .......................... 22,500 24,500 16,500 20,900 21,500 16,500 18,300 28,100 24,300 22,400 15,800 20,300 14,900 21,700 29,400 34,200 23,700 17,900 17,100 19,800 17,100 Nonmanufacturing ....................... 17,800 20,100 Commercial consulting f i r m s .... . Nonprofit research agencies ......... Other nonmanufacturing ............... 15,100 12,400 23,300 15,700 12,800 32,300 Chemicals and allied products ....... Petroleum refining ................... Primary metal industries ............. Fabricated metal products ............ Machinery (except electrical) ....... Electrical machinery ................. Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts ................... Professional and scientific instruments ....................... Other manufacturing ................ 1/ 7/ Figures rounded to the nearest $100. Source: tables C-24 and C-25- 35 68,600 $ 7>700 for companies with fewer than 500 employees to $8,000 for those with 500-4,999 employees and $9,200 for those with 5>000 or more employees. 2k/ The findings with respect to cost per research worker in individual companies are summarized in chart 10. Half the companies in the study had a cost per research worker of $7,300 or less. This median figure was lower than the average cost of $ 8,800 for all re porting companies, but the two statistics were much nearer together than the median and average figures on cost per research engineer or scientist. The explanation of the latter finding is that only a very small number of companies had an exceptionally high cost per research worker, whereas considerably more were found to have an extremely high cost per research engineer or scientist. 2k/ A classification of the companies by size of professional research staff showed a similar increase in average costs with the size of the organization. Average cost per research employee, by in dustry and size of company, is shown in table C-26; comparable data classified by size of professional research staff are presented in table C- 2 7 . 36 For the middle half of the companies, the range in cost per research worker was from $5>200 to $10,000. This Interquartile range was less than half as great as the corresponding range in cost per research engineer or scientist. Similarly, in every industry and com pany size group, the figures on cost per research employee in individ ual companies varied much less than those on cost per research engineer or scientist. Cost ratios based upon all research employees, including supporting personnel as well as engineers or scientists, do not reflect the wide variation among companies in the utilization of supporting workers. 275235 0 - 53 -4 37 T U R N O V E R OF P R O F E S S IO N A L R E SE A R C H STAFF During the past 3 years of partial mobilization, the rate of turnover of engineering and scientific personnel became a matter of grave concern to administrators of research programs and Government agencies responsible for defense manpower problems. On projects essential to the defense effort as well as nondefense projects, losses of profes sional personnel increased, owing to Reserve and Selective Service calls and to the many favorable employment opportunities open to engi neers and scientists. Administrators reported also that replacements were difficult to obtain, because of the personnel shortages in these professions, and that the training of new employees is, at best, a wasteful and time-consuming process. One of the major aims of the present survey was to provide information on the rate of turnover of professional research staffs and on how much of this turnover was due to withdrawals for military service. Figures on separations of research engineers and scientists were obtained for two periods--the 12 months following the outbreak of war in Korea (July 1950-June 1951) and the subsequent 6 months (July to December 1951)• Data for the latter period have been con verted to an annual rate basis to facilitate comparisons with data for the preceding year. Information was obtained also on the Reserve and Selective Service status of research staffs at the time of the study, in order to indicate their liability for future military duty. ANNUAL SEPARATION RATE The annual separation rate of research engineers and scien tists during the last half of 1951 was l6.k per 100 employed. 25 / Calls for military service were responsible for less than one-fifth of all the separations of research engineers and scientists from July to December 1951- Ihe annual rate of military calls during this period was only 3-0 per 100 professional research workers. Reserve calls averaged 1.8 per 100 workers and Selective Service calls 1.2 per 100 (table C-28). Factors other than calls to military duty caused the bulk of the separations during this period about 1 3 .h per 100 research en gineers and scientists. These separations included quits, discharges, lay-offs, deaths, and retirements. Although no separate statistics 25 / Separations include all terminations of employment initiated b y either the employer or the employee during the period. 38 were collected on the reasons for separations (other than military calls), losses due to deaths and retirements accounted for a relatively small proportion of separations. 26/ Petroleum refining was the industry with the lowest separa tion rate (8.8 per 100 research engineers and scientists). In the air craft industry, where the tremendous expansion in employment resulting from the defense program led to increased competition for scientific and technical personnel, the separation rate was 20.8 per 100. However, in certain industries with smaller research staffs, the average separa tion rate was even higher--nearly 25 per 100 in companies manufacturing photographic equipment and supplies and in nonprofit research agencies. Although the differences among industries in the rate of personnel loss were due largely to factors other than the rate of mili tary calls, separations for military service had a greater impact on some industries than others (chart 11). Companies manufacturing ma chinery (except electrical) had the highest annual rate of military 2 6/ Statistics on the white male population as a whole indicate that the annual rate of deaths and retirements is about 2 per 100 employed workers. See U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bulletin No. 1001, Tables of Working Life, August 1950* 39 calls (7.2 per 100 engineers and scientists). The lowest rate (1.2 per 100) was found in the petroleum industry and the nonprofit re search agencies. There was no consistent relationship between the rate of personnel turnover and the size of a company. In some industries, the companies with the smallest number of employees had the highest turn over rate. However, in other industries, the medium-sized and large companies fared worse than the small ones (table C- 29 ) • A comparison of these separation rates for the last half of 1951 with comparable figures for the preceding 12 months shows a marked increase in turnover among research engineers and scientists. The an nual separation rate of l6.4 per 100 professional research workers for all the reporting companies during July-December 1951 was 18 percent higher than the rate of 13-9 during the year from July 1950 to June 1951- Personnel losses became more frequent in practically every in dustry and in companies of all sizes (tables C-28 and C- 30 )• 27/ There was no change in the rate of Beserve calls between the two periods, taking all industries together. The rate of withdrawals due to Selective Service rose by 50 percent (from 0.8 to 1.2 per 100 engineers and scientists), but such separations were too few to be a major factor in the overall Increase in personnel losses. Most of the increase was in separations for reasons other than military service— no doubt, mainly transfers to other more attractive employment. LIABILITY FOB MILITARY SERVICE Although Reserve and Selective Service calls did not cut deeply into the national supply of research engineers and scientists during the last half of 1950 or 1951 ^ the future effect of military demands on such personnel could be more serious. As of January 1952, 19 percent of the engineers and scientists in the study were members of the Reserves or National Guard and were therefore liable for mili tary service. Another 6 percent were classified 1A or 2A by Selective Service (available for service or granted temporary occupational de ferments) . The total number of men in these categories was approxi mately 2 ^, 000 , out of the 95>700 engineers and scientists of both sexes in the study. The relative numbers of professional research workers who were reservists or classified 1A or 2A as of January 1952 varied 27 / Annual separation rates axe also classified by size of pro fessional research staff (table C-31). considerably from one industry to another (chart 12). The proportion was highest in the two industries most extensively engaged in defense research— electrical machinery (35 percent) and aircraft (29 percent). Of the major industries shown in the chart, primary and fabricated metal products had the lowest proportion (15 percent) of the profes sional research staff in the categories most liable to military duty. In general, large companies were in a somewhat more vulner able position than small ones with respect to the military status of their engineers and scientists. Twenty-nine percent of the profes sional research personnel employed by companies with 5,000 or more employees were members of the Reserves or classified 1A or 2A as of January 1952 (table C-32). The comparable figure for companies with 500-4,999 employees was 19 percent and for those with fewer than 500 employees, 15 percent. It is likely that large companies have, in the past several years, hired relatively more new graduates than small er companies and that they therefore have a higher proportion of young men on their staffs. 28 / 28/ Figures classified according to the size of the companies' professional research staffs likewise show that the proportion of re search engineers and scientists liable to military service tended to be greater in large than in small organizations (table C -33). 4l It should he noted that all these data on the liability of research engineers and scientists to military service relate to the situation in January 1952. Since then, a considerable change in the proportion of professional research workers liable for military duty has probably taken place, since men axe constantly leaving and others entering the Reserve and the various Selective Service categories. In early 1953 > many reserve officers had to reapply for their commis sions in order to keep their reserve status; a substantial number did not sign up again. Offsetting the reduction in reserve forces due to resignations, retirements, and deaths is the fact that many recent engineering and science graduates have been liable for military duty. Most men graduating from college are subject to the provisions of the Selective Service Act. In addition, a considerable number of male graduates have been commissioned in the Organized Reserves after com pleting Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs. Under present legislation, nearly every young man has an obligation to serve for a total of 8 years, including both active duty and service in the Reserves. Thus, there is a strong likelihood the number of persons in the Reserves will increase in the future and will become an even more important problem in scientific manpower planning. k2 A PPEN D IX A SCOPE AND METHOD OF SURVEY ^3 SCOPE AND METHOD OF SURVEY HOW THE SURVEY WAS MADE This study of industrial research is based on a mail survey conducted from May to August 1952 by the Research and Development Board of the Department of Defense. Plans vere developed and the questionnaire was drafted by the Board, in consultation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, other Government agencies, and several companies with large research and development programs. The questionnaire is reproduced in Appendix B. The Bureau of Labor Statistics prepared this report in co operation with the Research and Development Board. The Bureau was responsible for the editing and coding of the returns and the planning and preparation of both the statistical tabulations and the analytical report. In an effort to inventory all industrial research in the United States, a mailing list of more than 5>000 companies was com piled. It included all companies listed in the National Research Council's volume, Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States, 1950 and any additional firms included in lists of the following: The 1,000 largest manufacturing companies in the country, companies holding research and development contracts with the Department of Defense, the 100 largest Department of Defense production contractors; and other selected groups, such as engineering firms and consulting laboratories. Some additional companies having research programs were located through the wide publicity given to this survey by newspapers and technical and trade journals. The mailing of survey schedules began in May 1952. Nonre spondents were sent follow-up letters in July 1952. By mid-October 1952, when the survey vas closed, some 3>000 companies had responded. Of these, 1,953 submitted usable questionnaires. 29/ Some 1,000 re plies were received from companies which said they had no research program. Several companies, including a few with large research pro grams, stated that they could not supply the requested data, either because of the cost of assembling the information or because they con sidered such data confidential. Although 1,953 companies sent in usable schedules, not all of them supplied data on every item in the questionnaire. For example, l 8l of the reporting companies failed to report their 1951 research 29/ The criterion used in evaluating the usability of a com pleted” schedule was that the company must have reported at least one of the following items: Cost of all research, number of research workers, or number of research engineers and scientists. 4k cost, 13V did not indicate the number of research employees in 1952, and 138 did not report the number of research engineers and scientists. Estimates were made of these three items for each of the nonreporting companies, and these estimates have been included in the data presented in charts 1, 2, and 5 , and in tables 2, 3, 4, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-13, and D-3. The remaining charts and tables are based wholly on data actually reported by the companies in the survey. PROBLEM OF DEFINITION Scientific research and development work was defined as fol lows in the questionnaire: 30/ Basic and applied research in the sciences (including medicine), and in engineering; and design, development, and testing of prototypes and processes. Excludes quality control, product testing, market re search, sales promotion, sales service, and research in the social sciences and psychology. The possible lack of uniformity in the interpretation of definitions is perhaps the most important limitation that must be taken into account in the analysis of the results of this survey. A particularly difficult problem in connection with the definition of research and development arose from the fact that in some industries the line of demarcation between development and production is often hazy. In the aircraft industry, for example, the production of new models may begin before all details of the design are final. Further more, in many industries it is often necessary to make engineering changes and adaptations in products. In such cases, it is almost im possible to determine precisely where developmental processes end and production work begins, and the companies' judgment on this matter may well have varied. Even companies that could clearly differentiate research and development from related activities sometimes had difficulty in ascertaining the cost of their research programs and the number of their research employees. Many companies did not have accounting systems which could readily provide the requested cost data. Simi larly, some respondents did not have exact records on personnel al located to research and development work. This difficulty was en countered especially in companies where the research personnel were engaged intermittently in research and nonresearch activities. A n other problem of definition arose from the fact that the companies were asked to include in their figures on research employment "a pro portionate share of overhead personnel (administrative, clerical, 30/ The questionnaire, which also contains definitions of other terms, is reproduced in Appendix B. A 45 maintenance, etc.)." The extent to which overhead personnel were al located to research and development work undoubtedly varied somewhat among the reporting companies. Still another possible source of dif ficulty was the fact that companies were asked to include in the em ployment figures the full-time equivalent (based on the company’s average workweek) of employees engaged part-time in research work. These difficulties in obtaining precise statistics on re search and development activities were anticipated when the survey was planned. The survey questionnaire stipulated that reasonable estimates of research and development expenditures and manpower would be sufficient. Despite these limitations, the findings of this survey are believed to give a satisfactory general picture of the scope and dis tribution of industrial research activities. The reader should, how ever, bear in mind the approximate nature of the figures, particularly those for the more detailed classifications of companies. CLASSIFICATION OF DATA In this survey, respondents were requested to supply infor mation on a "company" basis. After consultations with industry repre sentatives and other persons, it was judged that the only practicable way to obtain the needed data on research and development programs was to ask each company to submit one consolidated return. One reason for the decision was that in many companies, large as well as small, the major part of the research activity is organized and controlled at the company level. To avoid duplicate reporting and, at the same time, to reduce the work involved in filling out the questionnaire, each com pany was asked to exclude from its return all scientific research and development done b y subsidiaries and affiliates— which were sent separate questionnaires. In the statistical tabulations, the data have been clas sified in several ways— by industry, b y the company's major research specialty, by size of company, and by size of the company's profes sional research staff. Though the conduct of the study was facili tated by the fact that only one consolidated return was submitted by each company, this created problems in connection with the classifi cation of data by industry and research specialty, as indicated by the following discussion and by the discussion of the research spec ialty classification in Appendix D. Industry In Item 12 of the questionnaire, a list of Hi industries was provided, and each company was asked to check the one of these H6 industries which accounted for the largest portion of its total sales. The 1*1 industries have been consolidated into smaller numbers of in dustry groups in the tables and charts. In comparing the findings of this study with other statis tics classified by industry, it should be noted that, in most such statistics, the unit classified is an establishment rather than a company. Even where the classification is based on establishments, figures for particular industries generally include some "secondary products" within the purview of other industries. In the present study, this problem is greatly magnified, particularly in the case of large, multiestablishraent companies with a number of different prod ucts or with integrated operations. It should be noted also that a company's principal research field does not always correspond with its principal production field. For example, companies seeking greater diversification are likely to concentrate their research activities in new areas. Size Reporting companies were classified on the basis of two different size groupings: The size of the company (based on total company employment in January 1952); and the size of the company’s professional research staff (based on number of research engineers and scientists in January 1952). The classification by size of com pany is a grouping widely used in analysis of economic data and prob ably the one of most interest to businessmen and business analysts. This size classification also facilitates the comparison of the re sults of the survey with findings from other surveys of industrial research and development. The classification of data b y the size of the company's professional staff directs attention to the scale of the company’s research program. It is useful in analysis of data pertaining to research resources for the following reasons: (a) The number of research engineers and scientists employed is one of the most impor tant factors determining a company’s ability to perform research; and (b) within groups of companies classified according to the number of research engineers and scientists, there is likely to be greater homo geneity with respect to research and development programs than is the case among companies grouped according to other size criteria. A PPEN D IX B LETTERS A ND SCHEDULE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD W A S H IN G T O N 25. D . C . 1 July 1952 D ear Sir: The R esearch and D evelopm ent Board, as you know, is undertaking a national m ail survey of industrial resea rch and developm ent. C opies of the questionnaire for th is project w ere sent you in M ay. We send them to you again with th is letter because we have had no reply from you since our fir st m ailing early in M ay, and we want to be su re you are counted. Our purpose is to obtain sta tistic s on the resea rch and developm ent p ra ctices and potential of A m erican industry. In the course of the current defense effort, we have a ll observed that in creasin g dem ands for technical m anpower and fa c ilitie s create difficult p ro b lem s. If we know m ore about the nation's resea rch and developm ent capacity and the effect of m ilitary c a lls on it, we can perhaps help ease som e of th ese p rob lem s. We should be able to plan m ilitary resea rch and developm ent m ore intelligently when we know m ore about how you in industry use your resea rch sc ien tists and e n g in e e rs. Should a greater national em ergency suddenly be forced on u s, we w ill need to know m ore than we do now about the location of sp ecific r e sea rch r e so u r c e s. In the course of the p roject, we m ay locate som e fa c ilitie s which even now are available and needed for m ilitary resea rch and developm ent p ro jects. R ep lies are already in from about 2500 com p an ies. But the project w ill be m ore useful if we get a m uch larger return as soon as p o ssib le . So I hope that if you have not replied you w ill do so very so o n . A reply does not obligate your company in any w ay, and your inform ation w ill be kept in strict confidence. If your, reply has been delayed because you can supply so m e , but not a ll, of the inform ation we seek , send us what you can. And, of cou rse, if your reply has been sent recen tly , or if you have w ritten us about the project and are w aiting for our an sw er, forgive th is duplication. WALTER G . WHITMAN, Chairman 51 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD WASHINGTON 25. D. C. Dear Sir: This is the second year of our current defense effort. In many ways it will be one of the most difficult. Among the pressing problems we face is the increasing demand for technical manpower and facilities which has been created by the expanded defense program . The Research and Development Board of the Office of the Secretary of Defense is , therefore, vitally interested in determining industry* s research and development capacity and the past and potential effect of m ilitary call-ups on this capacity. The Board also w ishes to assist the m ilitary de partments in locating possible contractors for research and development projects. All industrial organizations known to perform scientific research and development are being asked to help by com pleting the accompanying questionnaire. While some of the requested information is now available, it is unstandardized,, incom plete, and often inaccurate. If your company does no research or development, please complete only the tear sheet attached to the questionnaire. Your reply, of course, will not obligate your company in any way. It will be kept in strict confidence, and pub lished information will not permit identification of individual fir m s. Sincerely WALTER G. WHITMAN Chairman 52 o.tr »*.. SECURITV flinm nui INFORMATION MHITilUIIWL Budgat Burmau No. 22-3204 Approval Bxpirma 31 Aug 32 Data la E n te re d ) SURVEY OF INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIOHSince S accounting procedures for scientific research This questionnaire is concerned with all scientific research and development* by your company and estimates aa<* development widely amongPlease companies, its divisions. In order conducted to avoid duplication, please willappropriate, bevary satisfactory. enytrreasonable word exclude all subsidiaries and affiliates. "none" where rather than leaving atheblank. GEBERAL (Reaaonable oatimatam w ill bo a u f fi e ia a t ) 1. WHAT WAS THE TOTAL NUMBER EMPLOYED BY YOUR COMPANY IN ALL OF ITS ACTIVITIES IN JANUARY 1952? 2. WHAT WERE YOUR COMPANY’ S TOTAL SALES (or to ta l valua of aervicea, i f mora appropriate) IN OF ITS ACTIVITIES IN CALENDAR 1951? COST INFORMATION (Reaaonable aat imataa w ill be a u ffic ia n t) 3 . WHAT WAS THE TOTAL OPERATING COST OF ALL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMED WITHIN YOI PANY IN CALENDAR 1951? (Operat ing coat ia the coat o f diract labor and matariala plum proportionate ahare of overhead coat a --a d m iniatration, maintanance, rant, deprecjjrftUm^ atc 4. HOW MUCH OF I HIS TOTAL OPERATING COST WAS FOR RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT PERFORME PRIME CONTRACTS FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SUBCONTRACTS FROM OTHER COMPANIES FOR WORK FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL MANPOWER INFORMATION (Reaaonabla eatimataa w ill j e f a u t tL Quest iona 3 - 8 refer to the number engaged full time in reaearch or de\t^opi t iate equivalent (baaed on your current average work week) o f thoae wor 5. HOW MANY OF YOUR COMPANY’ S EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING A PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF OVERHEAD PERSONNEL (a d m iniatrative. c le r ic a l, maintenance. e t c .) WERE ENGAGED IN RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT: JANUARY 1951 JANUARY 1952 iGED IN RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT: 6 . HOW MANY OF YOUR COMPANY’ S ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS2 Wl JANUARY 1951 JANUARY 1952 ENGAGED IN 7. HOW MANY OF YOUR COMPANY’ S ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS JANUARY 1951 RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT ON: PRIME CONTRACTS FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMEN' F FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SUBCONTRACTS FROM OTHER COMPANIES FOR WORK F01 TOTAL ASSUMING THAT: a . NEW RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT DEFENS1 ARE AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR COMPANY IS WILLING TO WORK ENTIFIC RESEARCH ANO DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL b. THERE IS NO CHANGE IN THE STAFF, AND LEVEL, c . THE DEFENSE EFFORT CONTI RS AND SCIENTISTS YOUR COMPANY WISHES TO ASSIGN DURING WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF4 PRIME CONTRACTS OR SUBCONTRACTS FOR RESEARCH OR DETHE REMAINDER OF CALENDAR 1952 VELOPMENT FOR THE DEFENSE i^ROGRAM' HE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? (Your anawer w ill neither obt c o n t r a c t s nor w ill i t obligate the Federal Govern* lig a te your company in a a n v v to JANUARY 1952 «•w.mijn vuimi went in any.way to o f fer\a%H^O£ta ) . J H £ r S and SCIENTISTS PRIMARILY ENGAGED IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 9 . HOW MANY OF YOUR COMJ OR DEVELOPMENT IN J, ‘ HAD THE FOLLOWING MILITARY STATUS: MEMBERS OF MILITAR OR NATIONAL GUARD CLASSIFIED pvai labf/1 for induction) OR 2-A (deferred becauae o f c i v i l i a n employment) malea between the agea o f lfM and 26 can be ao claaai tie d 10. HOW MANY ENCIMEERS ANl) SCIENTISTS PR I MAR-1 LY ENGAGED IN RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT LEFT THE EM PLOY OF YOUlV VOMPANy CURING THE FOLLOWING PERIODS (exclude tranafera within the company): JULY 1950REASON FOR LEAVING JUNE 1951 JULY 1 9 5 1 DEC 1951 SEPARATIONS (R eaignation, diamlaaal, re tirem en t, death, e tc .) Baaic and applied reaearch in the aciencea (including rgedicine), and in engineering; and deaign, development and teating o f prototypes and proceaaea. Excludes q u a lity c o n tr o l, product te s tin g , market reaearch, sa les promotion, se rv ice , and reaearch in the social sciences and p sy c h o lo g y . 2sales Individuals with at lea st a bachelor’s degree in engineering or science, or the equivalent in experience or training. ROB FORM | U p 1 MAY 52 , H O 275235 0 - 53 - 5 ( C l a a a i f i a d Only Whan Data la .E ntered) 53 SECURITY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ,;raRH;Ti0Wconfidential .... >. CHECK LIST OF SPECIALTIES does not s t r i c t l y follow an i n d u s t r i a l c l a s s i f i c a t i o n p a tte rn , is in the The defense agencies wish to know the areas of research and develop form of g r e a te s t use to the defense agencies. Your response w ill n e ith e r ment in which i n d u s tr ia l o rg an iza tio n s are q u a lif ie d and, in ad d itio n , the o b lig a te your company in any way to accept c o n tr a c ts nor w ill i t o b lig a te are a s in which they might wish to undertake a d d itio n a l defense work. The the defense agencies in any way to o f f e r c o n tr a c ts . following check l i s t of research and development s p e c i a l t i e s , while i t IN THE COLUMNS HEADED: NEW DEFENSE WORK 11. IN THE COLUMNS HEADED: QUALIFIED CHECK (X) ALL SPECIALTIES IN WHICH YOUR COMPANY WISHES TO ASSIGN ANY OF a. RATE ("A”, "C") THE THREE BROAD AREAS IN WHICH YOUR COMPANY ITS PRESENT STAFF OF ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS OR ITS PHYSICAL FACILITIIES HAS GREATEST COMPETENCE. TO NEW DEFENSE CONTRACTS AT SOME TIME DURING CALENDAR 1952. (Refer to b. CHECK (X ) ALL OTHER BROAD AREAS IN WHICH YOUR COMPANY IS QUALIFIED. aaevmption* in Queation 8.) c. CHECK (X) UNDER EACH BROAD AREA THE SPECIALTIES IN WHICH YOUR COMPANY S QUALIFIED. NEW DEFENSE WORK QUALIFIED NEW DEFENSE WORK QUALIFIED ENGINEERS BROAD SPECIALAND Building* BROAD SPECIAL AREAS TIES AREAS TIES SCIENTISTS Equipment) _ *m/ SCIENTISTS. EqJ pZ nt) GEOPHYSICS AND GEOGRAPHY AIRCRAFT ARMAMENT □ (ID (01) (01) (Ql) BOMBING SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS (02) (02) FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS CARTOGRAPHY ( 03) GUNS (03) MUNIT IONS (04 ) GEODESY (04 ) (05) GEOLOGY (0*5 ) TESTING AND EVALUATION GEOMAGNETISM ANO ELECTRICITY (06) AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT HYDROLOGY (07) AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS (02) (01) ((58) IONOSPHERE ELECTR ICAL SYSTEMS (02 ) METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT (09) INSTRUMENTATION (03 ) (10) OCEANOGRAPHY (04 ) mechanical systems PHOTOGRAMMETR1C EQUIPMENT (11) PARACHUTES (0*5) PHOTO INTERPRETATION (12) TEST ING AND EVA LUATION (06 ) SEISMOLOGY AIRCRAFT, PILOTED (13 > (14) SOIL MECHANICS AERODYNAMICS AND STRUCTURES (03) (01) WEATHER FORECASTING CATAPULTS AND ARRESTING GEAR (15) (02 GUIDED MISSILES HYDRODYNAM ICS (03 ) AERODYNAMICS AND STRUCTURES PROPULSION (04 (12) (01) (02) COUNTERMEASURES testing , aircraft flight (06 (03 GUIOANCE ANO CONTROL TESTING, PROPULSION SYSTEMS (06) (04) LAUNCHING ANO HANOLING ATOMIC ENERGY PHYS ICAL EFFECTS (04 (01) PROPULS ION AND FUELS (08) TARGET DRONES RADIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION (06) (02) TEST RANGE PROCEDURES ANO INREACTORS (03 STRUMENTAT1ON WEAPONS RESEARCH (04) TEST AND TRAINING EQUIPMENT (08) BASIC NATURAL SCIENCES □ (09) WARHEADS AND FUZES 10*5) (Cl) BIOLOGY MEDICAL SCIENCES CHEMISTRY (02) □ ANT IB IOT ICS (13) (01) mathematICS (03) (02) ATOMIC MEDICINE (04 PHYS ICS AV 1AT 1ON MED 1C INE (03 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE □ (04) BACTER10 LOGY (06) (01) AGENTS FOR CROPS, ANIMALS AND MAN DENT ISTR Y (08) PROTECT ION (02) (06) DISEASE METHODS OF 01SSEM1NAT 1ON (03 ( n TT □ T T) ) ) ) n ) ) ) ) ) CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS (War Gaaax , Scraaning (07) (08) (09) (03) PROTECT ION MUNITIONS, WEAPONS 4 DISSEMINATION ELECTRONICS ACOUSTICS ANTENNAS ANO PROPOGATION COMHUNICATION COMPONENTS ELECTRON TUBES ELECTRONIC COUNTERMEASURES INFRAREO INTERFERENCE REDUCTION RADAR AND RE LATED FIE LDS TEST EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES CLOTH ING ANO PERSONAL ELECTR ICAL FOOD HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND ENGINEERING CONSTRUCT 1ON MAINTENANCE equipment and u t il i t i e s MARINE CRAFTS AND ASSOCIATED HYDRODYNAMICS MECHANICAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND OPTICS PACKING, PACKAGING AND PRESERVAT 1ON POWER UNITS SHELTER STORAGE TOOLS, GENERAL PURPOSE FUELS AND LUBRICANTS PETROLEUM SYNTHETIC LUBRICANTS AND HYDRAULIC FLUIDS LIQUID PROPELLANTS (Fuala and/or (04) EQUIPMENT FOR STORAGE, PROTECTION, AND DISTRIBUTION (02) „L ,03' L) (08) io n (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) (07) (08) (09) (10) □ (09) (01) (02) (03 ) 104) (05 ) (06) (07) (08) (09) (10) (ID (12) (13) □ (10) (01) (02) Smokaa and Incandiariaa) Oxidinara) (10) (ID (12) (13) (14) (15) (05) (06) □ (15) TT IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL ASPECTS OF BIOLOGICAL ANO CHEMICA L WARFARE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT AND PROSTHETIC DEV ICES NEUROPSYCHIATRY PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY SANITATION SHOCK ANO TRANSFUS ION SURGERY TOX ICOLOG Y materials u o-P o fO o o 107) (01) (01) (02) (03) (04) (05 ) (06) (01) (02) (03) (04) (05 ) (06) (07) (66) (09) (10) (ID (12) (13) (14) INORGANIC AND MINERAL METALLURGY, EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY, PHYSICAL ORGANIC AND FIBROUS PHYSICS OF METALS PLASTICS NAVIGATION CELESTIAL DEAD RECKONING ELECTRONIC, COMMON USER ELECTRONIC, SELF SUFFICIENT GYRO AND INERTIAL PILOTAGE AND BEACONS ORDNANCE DEGAUSS 1NQ NETS AND BOOMS EXPLOSIVES ANO PROPELLANTS, MOLECULAR FIRE CONTROL FUZES, FIRING, ANO EXPLODING MECHAN ISMS GUNS AND MOUNTS, LARGE CALIBER LAND MINES AND GRENADES PROJECTILES AND AMMUN IT ION DETAILS _ ROCKETS AND ROCKET LAUNCHERS SEA MINES AND DEPTH CHARGES SMALL ARMS AND AUTOMATIC WEAPONS TORPEDOES AND TUBES VEHICLES. COMBAT VEHICLES. NONCOMBAT WARHEAOS AND BOMBS (Clara i f iad Only Whan Data la Bntarad) CONFIDENTIAL | NFORMATS ON (THIS SECTION WILL BE DETACHED AS SOON AS YOUE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE IS RECEIVED) NAME OF C0MPANY____________________________________________ NAME AND TITLE OF INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE BUSINESS AODRESS (City, Zona and Stata) _______________ PLEASE CHECK- IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY REPORT (Plaaaa Turn To Naxt Paga) PLEASE CHECK IF YOUR COMPANY OOES NO RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION CONFBEHTUL 0” >r »*'* '• ____________________________________________________ MIWSTBML CLASSIFICATION 12. PLEASE CHECK (X) AMONG THE FOLLOWING LIST OF INDUSTRIES THE ONE THAT ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST PORTION OF YOUR COMPANY'S TOTAL SALES (or to ta l value qf aervicea, i f aiore appropriate) IN ALL OF ITS ACTIVITIES IN CALENDAR 1951. NON-MANUFACTURING COMMERCIAL CONSULTING FIRMS NONPROFIT RESEARCH AGENCIES BUSINESS TRADE ASSOCIATIONS MINING: (20) _____ COAL, METALLIC AND NONMETALLIC MINERALS (21) CRUDE PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS (22) RAILROADS (23 > AIRLINES 12H) PUBLIC UTILITIES TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO AND TELEVISION (25 ) BROADCASTING ALL OTHER NON-MANUFACTURING (3 D MANUFACTURING (85) ORDNANCE AND ACCESSORIES (86) FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS (87) TOBACCO (88) TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS AND APPAREL (89) LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS (except fu rn itu re) (90) FURNITURE AND FIXTURES (91) PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS (92) PRINTING, PUBLISHING AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS: (HO) INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS (HI) DRUGS AND MEDICINES (H2) SOAP, CLEANERS, ETC. PAINT, VARNISH, LACQUER AND INORGANIC PIGMENTS (H3) (HH) OTHER CHEMICAL PRODUCTS (01) (10) (30) (50) 15D (93) (9H) (95) (96) (97) (98) (60) (61) (70) (71) (72) (73) (80) (81) (82) (99) MANUFACTURING (C oni’d) PRODUCTS OF PETROLEUM AND COAL: PETROLEUM COAL RUBBER PRODUCTS LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS STONE. CLAY AND GLASS PRODUCTS PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS (except ordnance. machinery , and t ranaport at ion equipment) MACHINERY (except e l e c t r i c a l) ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES*COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT OTHER ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT: MOTOR VEHICLES ANO MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPMENT AIRCRAFT AND PARTS RA 1 LROAD EQU 1 PMENT OTHER TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CONTROLLING INSTRUMENTS: SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES OTHER PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CONTROL LING INSTRUMENTS ALL OTHER MANUFACTURING INSTRUCTIONS FOR RETURNING QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Please place completed questionnaire in enclosed envelope marked "Security Information CONFIDENTIAL, " and seal. 2. Place this sealed ment Board, Washington 25, Denvelope . C. in enclosed franked envelope addressed to Chairman, Research and Develop 3. Seal franked envelope and mail. REMARKS # U.S.GOVERNMENTPRINTINGOFFICE.1952O—203715 0 . 1 , Wk.n B . t . i . u . t . r . d ) MIIPVHPIIVIAI Q )NFIDQ|TIN. OLvUnl I V INFORMATION A PPEN D IX C STATISTICAL DATA CLASSIFIED BY INDUSTRY, SIZE OF C O M PA N Y , AND SIZE OF PR O FESSIO N A L RESEARCH STAFF 57 C—1 Research and development expenditures in the United States and cost of research and development performed by Government, industry, and colleges and universities, 19^1 to 1952 (millions of dollars) Government Total Research Cost of research Year research expend!- expenditures performed tures Amount Percent Amount Percent 1200 22 19^1.•. $ 900 $ 370 h i 46 1942... 1,070 49c 240 22 64 1943... 1,210 780 300 25 1944... 1,380 940 68 28 390 1 , 07 c 28 430 70 1945... 1,520 1946... 1,780 910 470 26 51 1,160 520 1947... 2,260 51 23 1948... 2,610 22 1,390 570 53 21 1,550 1949... 2,610 550 59 1,610 56 20 570 1950... 2,870 1,980 700 21 59 1951... 3,360 2,240 60 800 21 1952... 3,750 i Colleges and .universities Industry Research Research Cost of research Cost of research performed expenditures performed expenditures Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent $ 40 $20 2 t 660 $ 510 57 5 73 20 c. 560 780 50 52 5 73 4l0 34 20 2 60 850 70 5 6 2 420 30 66 20 80 910 20 2 430 28 100 990 65 7 /•> 840 47 120 1,190 67 30 7 1,050 2 170 8 1,570 47 69 50 1,820 220 8 70 1,150 44 70 3 69 270 10 990 38 1,790 70 3 1,180 41 320 11 80 1,980 69 3 80 1,300 2,300 68 2 360 11 39 80 68 2 420 11 1,430 38 2,530 Source; Research and Development Board, Department of Defense, April 1953* C-2. Distributionofresearchemploymentandresearchcost, byindustry 1/ Percent distribution Industry Number of companies Employment, January 1952 All research workers Engineers and scientists Supporting personnel Cost of research, 1951 90.2 90.5 1.5 .8 .9 14.6 1.1 •9 .5 9.4 1.2 .8 .6 11.2 7.3 2.3 .6 .7 .6 8.7 3.2 .9 1.0 .8 6.3 1.7 .5 .5 .4 7.2 2.5 .7 .3 .5 49 33 38 50 150 184 236 105 26 63 16 5.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.3 5.6 21.8 27.9 6.7 21.0 .2 5.2 1.8 1.3 1.9 2.7 6.2 18.2 24.6 3.2 21.1 .3 5.2 1.1 1.7 1.4 2.0 5.3 24.3 30.1 9.0 21.0 .1 4.9 1.2 1.1 1.9 2.0 5.3 22.1 31.9 10.8 20.8 .3 Professional and scientific instruments ... Photographic equipment and supplies ..... Other professional and scientific instruments .............. ......... 153 24 5.7 1.9 6.0 2.1 5.5 1.7 4.7 1.6 129 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.1 Other manufacturing ..................... 93 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 Nonmanufacturing ....... ........ .......... 415 10.9 12:5 9.8 9.5 Commercial consulting firms .... ......... Nonprofit research agencies ............. Other nonmanufacturing .................. 286 39 90 3.1 2.7 5.1 4.0 3.6 4.9 2.6 2.1 5.1 2.5 2.0 5.0 Total..................................... -- 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Total number reported 2/ .................. 1,953 238,266 95,694 142,572 1,538 89.1 87.5 Food and kindred products ............... Textile mill products and apparel ........ Paper and allied products ................ Chemicals and allied products........... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ......................... • Drugs and medicines ................... Soap, cleaners, etc.................... Paint, varnish, etc. ................. . Other chemical products ................ 73 49 49 276 1.3 .8 .7 11.5 85 77 19 32 63 Petroleum refining ...................... Rubber products ........... .......... . Stone, clay, and glass products ......... Primary metal industries ........ ........ Fabricated metal products ............... Machinery (except electrical) ........... .* Electrical machinery .................... Transportation equipment......... . Motor vehicles and equipment .......... Aircraft and parts .................... Other transportation equipment....... Manufacturing ........................... . : $1,980 (millions) 1/ The figures in this table are estimates covering all 1,953 companies in the survey* They include companies that failed to report one or more of the items shown in the table. 2/ Although the manpower estimates are given in exact numbers, not all digits of these numbers are statistically significant. 59 C -3. D istr ib u tio n o f research employment and resea rch c o s t , by s iz e o f company 1 ./ Percent distribution Total company employment 0 25 100 200 500 1,000 5,000 25,000 50,000 100,000 24 99 199 499 999 - 4,999 - 24,999 - 49,999 - 99,999 or more ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. T o t a l ........ ..... ............ Total number reported 2/ ...... Number of companies 308 334 177 303 217 392 178 29 8 7 — 1,953- Employment, Janus?.ry 1952 All research workers Engineers and scientists 0.6 2.3 1.4 4.5 5.4 14.2 26.3 16.4 9.1 1.0 3.1 1.9 5-4 6.3 Supporting personnel 19 .8 13.7 0.4 1.7 1.1 3.8 4.8 13.6 25.6 16.0 9-2 23.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 238,266 95,694 142,572 1 5 .2 27.3 17.2 8 .9 Cost of research, 1951 0.5 1.9 1.1 3.8 4.7 12.8 23-9 16.6 8.7 26.0 100.0 $1,980 (millions) 1/ The figures in this table are estimates covering all 1,953 companies in the survey. They include companies that failed to report one or more of the items shown in the table. 2j Although the manpower estimates are given in exact numbers, not all digits of these numbers are statistically significant. C-4-. D is tr ib u tio n o f research employment and resea rch c o s t , by s iz e o f p r o fe s s io n a l research s t a f f 1 / Percent distribution Size of company's professional research staff 0 4 5 - 1 4 15 - 29 30 - 49 50 - 1A 75 - 124125-249 250 - 4 9 9 500-999 1^000 or more Total --- *........ ...... ....... ...... ..... . ................... ...... ............ .............. . ................... ................... .................. . ................... ......... ......... . .............. ........ ...... Total number reported 2/ ........ Number of companies 681 585 269 148 79 62 62 33 16 18 — 1,953 Employment, January 1952 Cost- of research, 1951 All research workers Engineers and scientists Supporting personnel 1.3 4.3 5.1 5.1 4-5 4-4 11.8 12.6 11.2 39.7 1.6 4-9 5.4 5.8 5.1 5.8 11.8 11.9 10.3 37.4 1.2 3.9 4.8 4.7 3.9 3.5 11.8 13.0 11.9 41.3 1.2 3.9 4.5 4.6 3.7 3.5 10.8 13.3 10.4 44.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 238,266 95,694 142,572 $1,980 (millions) 1/ The figures in this table are estimates covering all 1,953 companies in the survey. They include companies that failed to report one or more of the items shown in the table. 2/ Although the manpower estimates are given in exact numbers, not all digits of these numbers are statistically significant. C-5. Number of research engineers and s c ie n t is t s , by industry and s iz e o f company, January 1952 Companies with total employment of— Industries All sporting ompanies 0 to 24 25 to 99 100 to 199 200 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 to 4,999 5,000 to 24,999 25,000 to 49,999 50,000 to 99,999 100,000 •r more Not rep m vvu All industries*..,....... ............... . 91,585 801 2,785 1.583 4,819 5,746 13,827 24,353 15,674 8,482 11,600 1,915 Manufacturing*..... .................. ••••• 80,306 257 940 1,028 3,181 3,948 12,495 23,905 15,547 (S/) (2/) 1,400 MM MM — M. — — MM Food and kindred products ........ •••• Textile mill products and apparel....... Paper and allied products*.••••••....... Chemicals and allied products*........... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals........... ••••••.....•••• Drugs and medicines.................... Soap, cleaners, etc*...*.............. Paint, varnish, etc*.......... *....... Other chemical products********....... 1,358 734 4 — 847 13,201 (2/0 99 7,591 3,047 884 910 769 13 11 (2?) 568 33 38 (2/0 (2/) 21 66 70 21 49 62 (2/0 (I/O (2/5 31 19 15 5 -200 17 33 35 674 45 (2/0 &/) 799 358 '238 417 2,324 584 422 365 6,002 883 995 (2/) 143 (2/) 35 15 44 63 156 345 608 775 (2/0 737 (2/) 444 111 77 195 814 1,745 3,283 1,273 142 1,089 42 1,715 737 538 394 683 1,001 2,668 6,250 447 5,638 165 1,528 — (2/0 (2/) 263 162 (2/) 107 (2/) 8ft — S 3 79 34 92 63 (2/) 55 (2/) (2/) 18 27 (2/) 174 55 288 20 — 20 — 78 73 30 52 217 235 928 103 (2/) 76 (2/) 213 303 65 n 4,953 1,771 1,210 1,719 2,491 5,418 17,274 21,926 1,445 20,235 246 Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies.... Other professional and scientific instruments* *....................... 5,716 1,954 43 6 260 (2/) 149 38 572 211 770 362 659 (2/) 1,960 — 3,762 37 (2/) 111 361 408 (2/) 1,960 Other manufacturing................... 1,688 21 55 42 134 264 557 586 N onmanufacturing........................... 11,279 Commercial consulting firms............. Nonprofit research agencies....... ...... Other nonmanufacturing................... 3,428 3,204 4,647 k in 544 1,845 479 43 22 1,270 406 169 555 467 (2/) (2/) 1,638 794 725 119 1,798 (2/0 1.313 (2/) (2/) — -- MM (2/) — 625 MM 7) (2 (2/0 (2/0 (2/) 8,967 **M 8,967 — (2/) (I/) MM M. 4.091 (2/0 (2/0 (2/) 331 331 MM MM (2/0 (2/) 209 (2/0 (2/) 93 494 (2/) (2/) 15 108 109 143 41 (2/) (2/) — .MM -M (2/) — — (2/) 13 — — 16 (£/) (2/) 515 52 MM MM MM (2/) (2/) 463 — 448 127 (2/) -M -448 MM MM 127 451 MM MM -M (2/0 — — (2/) 1,332 kV ) (£/) — Petroleum refining*........... .......... Rubber products.......................... Stone, clay,and glass products.......... Primary metal industries*.... ........... Fabricated metal products................ Machinery (except electrical)......... . Electrical machinery.............. ....... Transportation equipment................. Motor vehicles and equipment...... .... Aircraft and parts........ *............ Other transportation equipment........ (2>0 — (?/) 3,365 (2/) 674 (2 58 51 32 29 30 9 36 21 12 (2/0 mm 1/ This table is based on reports from 1,815 companies. In addition, the study included 138 companies that failed to supply information on the number of research engineers and scientists employed in January 1952. 2/ Data withheld to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies, but these data are included in totals. C-6. Number of research engineers and s c ie n t is t s , by industry and s iz e o f p ro fessio n a l research s t a f f , January 1951 Companies with professional research staff of-— Industry All industries ..................... . Manufacturing.... ....................... All reporting companies 1/ 91,585 80,306 Food and kindred products ................ Textile mill products and apparel ........ Paper and allied products ................ Chemicals and allied products ........... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .......... ................ Drugs and medicines ................... Soap, cleaners, etc. ................... Paint, varnish, etc. ................... Other chemical products ............... 1,358 734 847 13,201 Petroleum refining ..................... . Rubber products .......................... Stone, clay, and glass prod u c t s .......... Primary metal industries ....... . Fabricated metal products ............. Machinery (except electrical)............. Electrical m a c h i n e r y ............. . Transportation equipment ......... ....... Motor vehicles and equipment ........... Aircraft and parts ..................... Other transportation equipment ......... 4,953 1,771 . 7,591 3,047 884 910 769 1,210 1,719 2,491 5,418 17,274 21,926 0 to 4 1.^0 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 9,689 1,000 or more 4,590 5,053 5,334 4,629 5,386 10,787 11,223 1,093 3,841 4,102 4,358 4,044 4,557 9,285 9,642 (2/) 68 175 (2/) (2/) (2/0 (2/) (2/) 746 _ 566 (2/) (2/) 1,393 (2/) _ — 1,975 _ — — 2,524 — (2/) (2/0 808 (2/) 1,160 (2/) (2/) 309 1,237 (2/) &0 (2/0 — — 57 38 184 53 (2/) 15 102 117 662 167 211 28 157 163 125 441 84 142 (2/) 375 890 346 237 (2/> 21 86 46 170 (*/) 37 82 109 114 52 136 (2/) 20 W) 26 120 94 143 59 120 415 551 606 246 40 11 171 47 91 33 1,445 20,235 30 to 49 15 to 29 5 to 14 8 78 88 133 462 616 779 346 106 151 89 223 248 (2/) — — (2/) (2/) 174 (2/) (2/) 105 (2/) 255 — — 965 (2/) 850 (2/) (2/) (2/) (£/) — 115 514 470 953 224 144 (2/) (2/) (2/) 294 190 540 767 373 (2/) (2/) — (2/) (2/) 614 742 277 (2/) (2/) (2/) — (2/) 1,007 2,i?8 — — (2/) (2/) 940 1,222 2,380 <2/0 (2/) (2/) (2/) 5,716 1,954 110 12 374 55 235 (2/) C2/) 450 (2/^ (2/) (2/) 3,762 98 319 (2/) (2/^ (2/) (2/) (2/) Other manufacturing .............. ....... 1,688 105 243 112 161 -- 301 766 Nonraanufacturing...... .................... 11,279 347 749 951 976 585 829 1,502 1,581 Commercial consulting f i r m s ...... . Nonprofit research a g e n c i e s ...... . Other nonmanufacturing ................... 3,428 3,204 4,647 257 16 74 525 51 173 610 530 185 273 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/> 818 (2/) (2/) 492 103 238 261 527 (2/) — — _ _ — — _ (2/) (2/) — — _ _ — — — (2/) 3094 2,632 _ 2,632 — Professional and scientific instruments ... Photographic equipment and supplies .... Other professional and scientific instruments ......................... 33,454 (£/' 9,243 14,242 _ 14,242 — (2/) (2/) _ (2/) (2/) — (2/) — 988 (2/) — — (2/) __ (2/) (2/0 _ (?/) 1/ This total is based on reports from 1,815 companies. In addition, the study includes 138 companies that failed to supply information on the number of research engineers and scientists employed as of January 1952. 2/ Data withheld to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies, but these data are included in totals. C-7* Number of reporting companies and number of research engineers and s c ie n tis ts , by size of professional research sta ff and siz e of company, January 1952 Size of professional research sta ff Companies with to ta l employment o f— 25,000 Less 500 5,000 than or to to 500 more 24,999 4,999 A ll reporting companies 1/ Number of comnanies T otal.................................................... ... i.i2 2 L 0 - 4 ........................................... 560 5 - 1 4 ........................................ 540 243 1 5 - 2 9 ......................................... 138 30 - 49........................... ............. 50 - 7 4 ....................................... 73 75 - 124...................................... 55 1 2 5 - 2 4 9 ...................................... 61 250 - 499 ...................................... • 30 500 - 999...................................... 15 1,0 0 0 or more......... •**••**•*«* 17 T o t a l ............................................. ., 89*670 0 5 15 30 50 75 125 250 500 - 1,0 0 0 4 ............................. ............. 1 4 . . . . . ................ ............ 29........................................ 49........................................ 74........................................ 124...................................... 249...................................... 499 ...................................... 999...................................... or m o r e * ••*••*•• l>359 4,421 4,839 5,155 4,388 5,13* 10,737 10,395 9,689 33,453 . 971 474 328 96 46 15 4 6 — — ......... m . . .. 80 189 121 72 36 29 23 6 3 --- ■ 162 5 25 19 20 21 20 26 15 7 4 40 1 3 l l c. 1 6 7 5 13 Number of research engineers and sc ie n tists _ M S 8 ., . _ ,._i2z5.Z2.... 24,353,. 1 ,1 1 8 2,565 1,909 1,691 861 330 983 531 — 223 1,644 2,447 2,686 2,199 2 ,72 6 3,925 1,8 36 1 ,8 8 7 188 518 15 736 3 24 15 42 1 ,2 1 5 1,960 113 118 4,695 5,535 4,531 4,960 1,134 2,493 3,271 28,493 X / Excludes 221 companies that fa ile d to report number of research engineers and s c ie n tists employed or to ta l company employment* 6k ... C-8. Average number o f research engineers and sc ie n tis ts per 100 employees, by industry and size of company, January 1952 A ll reporting companies Industry A ll industries Manufacturing ......... .................................................... Food and kindred products ............................. T extile m ill products and apparel . . . . . . . Paper snd a llie d products ............................... Chemicals and a llie d products ...................... Industrial organic and inorganic ch em ica ls............................... ....................... Drugs and medicines ....................................... Soap, cleaners, e tc . ...................................... Paint, varnish, e tc . ...................................... Other chemical products ......................... Petroleum refining Rubber p ro d u cts................................................ Stone, clay, dud glass products ......... Primary metal industries ................................. Fabricated metal products ........................... Machinery (except e le c tr ic a l) • • • • • ........... E lectrica l machinery .......................................... Transportation equipment ................................. Motor v eh icles and equipment .................... A ircraft and parts .......................................... Other transportation equipment ................ Professional a n d .scien tific instrum ents.. Photographic equipment and supplies . . . Other professional and s c ie n tific instruments ................................................... Other manufacturing ............................................ Nonmanufacturing ....................................................... Commercial consulting firms ........................... Nonprofit research agencies ........................... Other nonmanufacturing .................... ................. 65 1.5 1.6 .5 .5 .6 3.0 3.0 3 .0 2.6 3.5 2.8 Companies with to ta l employment o f— Less 500 5,000 than to or more 500 4,999 7.5 4 .7 1.7 1.7 1.3 5.3 5.1 5.8 6 .1 5.7 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.1 4.-5 4 .4 3.3 5.3 4.7 5.8 5.4 1.2 1.9 1.7 .7 •4 . .7 3.2 1.2 2.9 2.3 2 .4 3.6 — 1.0 1.4 .8 .3 .7 1.1 2.7 2.4 .4 4.3 .4 3.7 3 .4 3 .9 .9 1.1 3 .4 24.2 3 .! 4*0 2.8 2.1 2.4 3.9 .6 .6 .7 •9 1.3 2.6 2.7 .6 5.1 .4 3.2 7 .7 2.5 1.3 6 .7 24.5 47.2 .4 29.3 44.1 6 .1 10.5 49.2 2.0 7.5 10.4 6 .8 1 .4 •4 .5 .5 2.8 .9 1.5 .8 •2 .4 .9 2.6 2.3 .3 4.2 .3 3 .4 2.5 4 .4 .6 .3 __ — .3 C-9* 100 Average number of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts per by industry and size of company, and average number on Government subcontracts per on all Government contracts, January 100 Industry employed 1952 Number of engineers and scientists on Government contracts per 100 employed Companies with total employment of — All reporting Less 500 5,000 companies than to or more 500 4,999 Number of engineers and scientists on Government subcon tracts per 100 on all Government contracts All industries............................ 48.9 58.7 47.9 49.3 12.4 Manufacturing................... *.... .... 48.9 59.6 46.4 50.7 11.3 Food and kindred products ............... Textile mill products and apparel......... Paper and allied products ............... Chemicals and allied products...... ..... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .......................... Drugs and medicines ................... Soap, cleaners, etc.................... Paint, varnish, etc.................... Other chemical products..... .......... .7 10.2 3.5 5.4- 4.3 40.0 — 10.3 1.0 16.4 3.4 6.2 .1 3.3 3.8 4.3 _ 15.7 51.9 14.8 6.8 .9 3.9 9.4 10.3 13.4 7.5 2.3 13.8 8.5 5.7 1.0 26.3 17.0 10.5 6.4 .1 .3 6.2 — 6.2 20.8 37.8 53.6 3.4 Petroleum refining ....................... Rubber products .... .................... Stone, clay, and glass products .......... Primary metal industries ................ Fabricated metal products ............... Machinery (except electrical) ............ Electrical machinery .................... Transportation equipment ................ Motor vehicles and equipment •.......... Aircraft and parts .................... Other transportation equipment ......... 4.5 19.3 6.9 10.0 39.9 24.5 2.5 46.3 U.9. 22.8 53.3' — 58.0 76.7 48.0 89.0 70.0 8.6 . 85.0 62.5 13.3 37.3 31.7 69.8 91.9 28.2 98.4 60.3 3.8 15.7 2.2 4.8 16.0 16.0* 54.1 86.2 21.6 91.4 32.3 13.7 28.2 11.3 28.8 46.5 35.8 12.4 6.5 11.5 6.3 21.2 Professional and scientific instruments ... Photographic equipment and supplies ••... Other professional and scientific instruments.... ........ ...... .... 69.6 79.9 74.8 88.2 57.2 76.2 76.3 — 12.5 15.0 67.7 71.2 47.1 76.3 12.0 Other manufacturing..................... 68.8 71.5 75.7 58.8 15.7 Nonmanufacturing .......................... 49.2 57.8 56.8 28.1 19.4 83.3 54.5 48.0 __ — 28.1 32.7 7.4 10.6 Commercial consulting firms ............... Nonprofit research agencies .............. Other nonmanufacturing .................... 60.2 86.6 23.1 92.1 65.8 53.0 35.4 66 64.3 50.9 22.0 19.8 C-10. Average number of research engineers and scientists on Government contracts per 100 employed, by industry and size of professional research staff, January 1952 Industry All reporting companies Companies with professional research staff of — 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 to 249 or more All industries .............................. A8.9 29.1 37.3 41.3 38.9 33.7 32.1 44*4 38.0 49.9 63.8 Manufacturing ................................ 48.9 29.5 35.4 37.9 34.7 37.1 30.9 40.3 35.1 48.4 66.6 Food and kindred products ................. Textile mill products and apparel ......... Paper and allied products ................. Chemicals and allied products ............ Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ....... *.................... Drugs and medicines ...................... Soap, cleaners, etc.............. ........ Paint, varnish, etc........... ........... Other chemical products .................. .7 10*2 3.5 5.4 4.6 26.5 2.9 11.3 2.1 27.3 2.9 7.4 0 14.7 6.9 10.4 0 G/> _ — — _ _ (1/) _ _ (1/) 6.8 •9 3.9 9.4 10.3 22.5 6.5 0 21.4 7.1 5.5 4.4 0 9.6 14.5 1.5 0 a/) a/) a/) _ __ — __ _ 4.5 19.3 6.9 10.0 39.9 24.5 7.5 46.2 5.5 33.3 45.6 22.0 65.5 60.9 23.4 81.3 56.5 _ 41.9 16.7 23.1 4.2 17.4 43.4 30.0 53.3 57.8 50.0 65.4 45.5 Petroleum refining .... .................... Rubber p r o d u c t s ...... .................. Stone, clay, and glass products ........... Primary metal industries ......... ......... Fabricated metal products ................. Machinery (except electrical) .............. Electrical m a c h i n e r y ....... ............... Transportation e q u i p m e n t ....... ........... Motor vehicles and equipment ............. Aircraft and parts ...................... Other transportation equipment ....... 60.2 86.6 23.1 92.1 9*4 5.5 39.7 35.2 31.0 1.4 0/) 4.1 10.9 11.3 0 (i/) a/) 15.5 1<£*4 a/) 6.1 a /) a/) &/) 4.0 2.9 a /) G /) 0/) a/) d7> 9.9 51.7 76.3 19.3 74.5 76.7 O /) 100.0 — 84.8 a/) a/) 6.9 7.9 0 — a/) a/) 0 a /) 48.8 26.1 66.6 40.2 32.3 a/) (1/) 30.9 21.1 67.8 57.5 23.6 __ 2.1 5.8 a/) .6 a /) a/) a/) a/) a /) — 3.0 6.5 a/) Q/> a/) 38.9 52.5 85.6 46.2 97.0 88.9. 0/) a/) Q/> 99.1 100.0 — — — ( V) a/) G/> _ a /) 2.4 a/) _ __ a/) (V) — — a/) a/) 77.8 71.6 a/) _ _ _ a/) 90.8 — _ _ _ _ a/) 49.7 90.7 _ 90.8 90.7 — Professional and scientific instruments .... Photographic equipment and supplies ...... Other professional and scientific instruments .......................... 69.6 79.9 53.9 62.5 62.1 87.3 52.5 a/) 67.7 (1/) 49.9 35.1 a /) a/) 67.7 53.1 56.8 53.0 60.8 42.3 43.3 a/) — — a/) Other manufacturing ..................... 68.8 12.3 50.2 61.6 59.0 — 69.3 82.8 — — — Nonmanufacturing ........... .................. 49-2 27.9 46.9 49.6 56.3 50.8 37.9 68.9 53.8 a/) a/> Commercial consulting firms ............... Nonprofit research agencies *.............. Other nonmanufacturing ..................... 65.8 53.0 35.4 33.3 — 15.3 56.8 28.2 21.8 65.3 52.5 2.0 89.8 24.9 U.6 76.9 a /> a/) a/) 67.3 a/) 0/) a/) 44*3 (1/) d/) l/ Data are not shown for fewer than three companies* 31.5 a/) _ a/) c-ll. Percent change in employment of research engineers and s c ie n tis ts , January 1951 to January 1952, by industry and size of compaay A ll reporting companies Industry A ll in d u stries ........................................................... Manufacturing .............................................................. Food and kindred products ............................... T extile m ill products and apparel .............. Paper and a llie d products • ............................. Chemicals and a llie d products ...................... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ................................................... Drugs and medicines ........................................ Soap, cleaners, e tc .......................................... Paint, varnish, e tc .......................................... Other chemical products ............................... Petroleum r e f in in g .............................................. Rubber p ro d u cts......... *......................................... Stone, clay, and glass products Primary metal industries ................................. Fabricated metal products ............................... Machinery (except e le c tr ic a l) .................... E lectrica l machinery .......................................... Transportation equipm ent................................. Motor veh icles and equipment . • ................ A ircraft and parts .......................................... Other transportation equipment ................ Professional and s c ie n tific instrum ents.. Photographic equipment and supplies »•. Other professional and sc ie n tific instruments ................................................... Other m anufacturing........................................ Nonmanufacturing ....................................................... Commercial consulting firms ........................... Nonprofit research agencies ......... ................. Other nonmanufacturing ...................................... 68 23.7 23.8 7.2 2 .4 6 .9 10.8 11.9 10.7 6 .6 3.5 14.4 5.7 10.4 6 .0 9.5 20.8 14.7 27.5 45.0 10.9 48.5 27.5 28.3 21.4 32.6 33.9 23.2 31.5 24-9 16.8 Companies with to ta l employment of— Less than 500 500 to 4,999 6.8 -14.0 4 .8 15.2 22.3 21.9 13.5 2.9 6.3 13.8 20.0 29.1 5.9 8.6 11.1 13.0 15.1 27.8 3.2 16.1 3 3 .4 3 3 .8 15.5 15.5 7.8 38.6 36.3 22.0 63.7 45.6 -2 .8 66.7 14.3 39.2 58.0 33.6 30.1 33.1 36.9 30.4 14.6 b.K 22.3 1 4 .2 6.2 19 .2 18 .9 19.4 37.9 8.0 41.7 25.9 41.3 66.1 31.7 44.0 23.9 .8 21.8 46.4 5,000 or more 2 3.0 2 3 .8 4 .6 4 .5 8 .0 9 .8 1 1 .3 9 .9 3 .9 2 .0 — 5.6 9 .4 5 .4 8 .9 17.2 11.4 27.0 45.7 11.2 49.0 28.9 18.0 5.2 30.0 23.5 10.3 __ — 10.3 C-12. Percent change in employment of research engineers and s c ie n tis ts , January 1951 to January 195* > by industry and size o f professional research s ta ff 275235 0 - 53 Companies with professional research staff of — Industry All reporting companies 75 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 124 to 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more All indust r i e s ....... .................. . 23.7 5.3 21.7 22.3 20.0 20.0 27.4 19.0 15.4 27.7 29.3 Manufacturing ............................ 23.8 6.6 21.9 21.8 16 .4 18.0 26.9 17.0 14.6 27.1 31.1 Food and kindred products .............. Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied products ............. Chemicals and allied products ......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ......................... Drugs and medicines ................. Soap, cleaners, etc.................. Paint, varnish, etc....... ........... Other chemical products ......... . 7.2 2.4 6.9 10.8 6.5 0 5.6 7.0 11.1 8.5 2.6 16.2 4.0 -7.5 5.0 13.1 19.1 G/) e/> G/) 16.0 0 . O/) — 8.2 _ — — _ — — 11.9 10.7 6.6 3.5 14.4 8.2 16.7 0 0 2.2 22.8 17.7 16.7 4-9 14*9 18.3 11.8 5.2 13.9 G/) G/) 10.8 Petroleum refining .................... Rubber products ..................... .. Stone, clay, and glass products ....... Primary metal industries •.. •........... Fabricated metal products ............. Machinery (except electrical) ......... Electrical machinery .................. Transportation equipment ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ........ Aircraft and parts .................. Other transportation equipment ...... 5.7 10.4 6.0 9.5 20.8 H.7 27.5 45.0 10.9 48.5 27.5 2.8 -4.8 3.2 0 12.5 19.0 11.7 -6.3 -11.1 5.3 -31.2 18.8 18.5 12.9 24.7 39.7 10.2 30.9 23.9 6.8 42.2 10.0 2.0 10.6 6.0 20.9 9.5 18.9 35.2 44.8 6.0 109.7 32.8 Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies .. Other professional and scientific instruments ...................... 28,3 21.4 3.8 0 38.9 41.0 45.1 G/) 32.6 4.3 38.5 Other manufacturing ................... 33.9 5.1 Nonmanufacturing ....................... . 23.2 Commercial consulting firms ........... Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing............. . 31.5 24.9 16.8 1 / Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. G/> 6.8 14.3 9.0 8.5 15.4 G/) — 17.3 16.3 6.6 G/) G/) G/) 10.2 17.4 2.9 e /j a /) G/) G/> g /) 6.5 31.0 6.7 45.3 9.2 30.9 — G/) 7.8 e/) G/) O/) — — 6.7 6.7 — — 10.2 17.2 0/) G/) 0/) 5.8 — — G/) — — G/) G/) 0/) G/) 6/) G/) 5.6 G/) a /) G/) a/) — — — — — — G/) G/) __ — — _ _ 26.2 G/) 40.2 — — _ — 28.4 66.1 — 66.1 — G/) 27.2 45.7 _ 45.7 — 27.9 29.7 103.7 19.8 19.3 52.6 59.6 — G/) G /> 0/) 50.6 17.4 23.6 Q A G/) G/) G /> O/) G/) _ — G/) G/) 44.9 47.0 7.6 17.8 G/> — — 0/> 27.2 47.4 37.6 — 81.3 25.4 ~ — — 1.5 20.5 24.6 39.0 35.7 30.3 32.6 15.6 a/) G/) 2.8 -11.1 0 24.2 26.6 25.6 61.1 5.1 32.5 97.8 3.0 G/> 21.2 G/) _ _ Q/> 26.2 G/) 17.3 G/) _ G/) 0/) 9.8 13.1 19.6 24.6 8.2 2.1 G/) G/) 26.0 G/) 27.9 G/) — 20.2 a/) C-13. Percent change in employment of research engineers and scientists on Government prime contracts and subcontracts, January 1951 to January 1952, by industry A Engineers and scientists employed on Government contracts Prime contracts Total Subcontracts Industry Percent change Percent change, Number Percent change, Number Number reported, Jan. 1951 to reported, Jane 1951 to reported, Jan. 1951 to Jan.1952 Jan. 1952 Jan#1952 Jan.1952 Jan. 1952 Jan.1952 All industries .................... 1/45, 445 52.0 1 /3 9 ,713 5 1 .0 1 / 5 ,7 32 57.6 Manufacturing ..................... 39*467 52.2 34,863 5 1 .7 4,604 57.5 Chemicals and allied products •••• Petroleum r e f i n i n g ...... ........ Primary metal industries.... . Fabricated metal products ....... Machinery (except electrical) .... Electrical m a c h i n e r y............ Motor vehicles and equipment ••••• Aircraft and parts .............. Professional and scientific instruments................. . Other manufacturing ............. 802 223 181 1,022 1,443 10,460 710 18,636 6 9.8 8.7 5.7 44.6 74.2 54.0 104.0 52.8 683 192 129 547 926 9,163 628 17,462 81.2 34.6 21.2 36.0 53.3 53.0 106.8 53.1 119 31 52 475 517 1 ,2 9 7 82 1,174 45.6 -50.8 -19.0 56.5 130*2 84.9 90.9 49.4 4,139 1,851 44.2 40.7 3,630 1,503 45.2 40.5 509 348 29.5 50.5 Nonmanufacturing ................... 5,978 50.8 4,850 46.3 1,128 67.6 Commercial consulting firms ..... Nonprofit research agencies ..... Other nonmanufacturing .......... 2,502 1,813 1,663 52.9 31.2 66.8 1,684 42.1 31.4 67.6 818 134 176 70.1 1,679 1,487 1/ These figures are estimates covering all 1*953 companies in the survey* not all digits of the numbers are statistically significant. 29.2 88*4 Although exact numbers are given, , C-14. Average number or supporting personnel per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by industry and .size of company, January 1952 All companies Companies with fewer than 500 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean */ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean t / Median Lower quartile Upper quartile 1/ 1,735 1.5 0 .8 0.3 1.5 921 0.9 0.5 0 .1 1.3 Manufacturing ............................ 1,398 1.5 .8 .3 1.5 640 1 .0 .7 .2 1.4 Food and kindred products ........ . Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied p r o d u c t s .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ............... ......... Drugs and medicines ......... ........ Soap, cleaners, etc.................. Paint, varnish, etc. ................. Other chemical products ......... . 67 46 48 243 1 .0 1 .6 .6 1 .0 .6 .6 17 .8 .5 .4 .5 •4 0 0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 75 1 .1 .8 .8 .8 Petroleum refining .................... Rubber products ....................... Stone, clay, and glass products ....... Primary metal industries .............. Fabricated metal products ............. Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical machinery ................... Transportation equipment ••••«......... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts .................. Other transportation equi p m e n t ..... . 46 31 35 43 137 166 217 14 1.7 5.2 1.5 .7 Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies .. Other professional and scientific instruments ........... ........... 139 1.4 20 All industries .................. ....... 68 17 29 54 .9 .9 .7 1.5 .'9 1.9 1 .1 1 .1 1.3 2 .0 .6 .6 .5 .3 •4 .3 .2 .3 .7 .5 .1 .2 .2 .2 1 .0 ,5 .9 .9 .7 .4 .5 .4 .4 .4 .5 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 12 11 1 .6 152 .7 1 .0 1 .0 .8 1 .0 1 .0 47 39 .7 .5 .7 1.5 1.3 1.7 1 .0 1 .8 8 60 1.9 1 .8 5.0 2.4 63 114 25 4 19 1.7 1 .0 1 .0 2 .0 2 .6 ,5 .5 0 34 .7 .3 .3 .3 .7 •4 0 0 0 0 0 17 14 13 1 .8 .8 .5 .7 .5 .3 .3 1 .0 .7 •4 .4 .7 .7 1.3 1 .0 10 22 .8 i .6 0 0 .3 .7 1 .0 .7 1 .0 1 .0 1.1 1 .0 1.3 .8 .2 1.5 1.4 (2/J .3 .3 (2/) 2 .0 2 .8 (2/) (*/) 3.0 (2/) 1 .2 ,5 1 .6 .6 .4 .3 1 .0 2 (£/) 1.5 G /) 1 .2 .8 1 .0 .3 .2 1.5 1.5 96 14 1 .1 .6 .6 1 .0 .2 .3 1.5 1.3 119 1.4 .7 .3 1.5 82 1.3 .6 .2 1.5 Other manufacturing .................... 80 1.4 .9 .3 1.5 38 .9 .8 .3 1.5 Nonmanufacturing .... .................... 337 1 .2 .5 0 1 .1 281 .8 .5 0 1 .0 Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ............ Other nonmanuf a d u r i n g ................ 226 1 .0 .8 .6 .7 .9 4 80 27 42 .5 .5 .5 0 1 .6 1 .0 1 .0 212. .9 .5 .5 0 31 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 See footnotes at end of table* 100 24 62 1.3 2.3 .4 .3 1.3 .4 2 .2 1.5 .1 0 C-14. Average number of supporting personnel per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by industry and size of company, January 1952—Continued Companies with 5,000 or more employees Companies with 500 to 4,999 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean ^ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean— / Median Lower quartile Upper quartile All industries ........................... 545 1.3 0.9 0.4 1.8 200 1.6 1.1 0.6 1.9 Manufacturing.............. ............. 516 1.3 .9 .4 1.8 188 1.6 1.1 .7 2.0 Food and kindred products ............. Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied p r o d u c t s ...... ....... Chemicals and allied p r o d u c t s ....... .. Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ...... .................. Drugs and medicines .................. Soap, cleaners, etc................... Paint, varnish, etc................... Other chemical products ............. 31 22 28 62 .8 1.3 .9 .8 .5 .7 .6 .7 .3 .4 .3 •4 1.0 1.3 .9 1.1 15 10 9 22 1.2 1.9 .9 1.0 .9 1.7 .7 .8 .5 1.3 .2 .7 1.0 2.1 1.4 1.1 18 20 3 4 17 .8 .8 .8 .7 ,7 .8 .7 (2/) (2/) .5 .4 .6 (2/) (2/) .4 1.2 .9 (2/) (2/) 1.4 9 7 3 3 1.1 •9 .8 .7 .7 (2/) (2/) (1/) — 1.0 (2/) (2/) (2/) — Petroleum refining ..................... Rubber products ........................ Stone, clay, and glass products Primary metal industries ............... Fabricated metal products .............. Machinery (except electrical) ......... Electrical machinery ................... Transportation equipment .............. Motor vehicles and equipment ........ Aircraft and parts ........ .......... Other transportation equipment ...... 9 11 13 19 56 78 86 41 10 24 7 1.6 1.2 .9 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.9 3.2 1.8 1.3 .9 1.3 .8 .5 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 2.8 1.0 (2/) .3 .6 .6 .2 .5 .4 .6 .6 1.3 .7 (2/) 1.0 1.5 1.7 .9 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.5 3.7 1.9 (2/) 17 4 7 13 13 22 11 31 9 17 5 1.5 .9 2.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 2.2 1.7 5.6 1.4 .4 1.2 (2/) (2/) .9 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.3 5.0 1.3 (2/) .9 U/) (2/) .7 .7 .5 .8 .5 .7 .5 C§/) 1.6 (2/) (2/) 1.5 1.5 2.1 1.8 3.0 6.2 2.4 (2/) Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies .. Other professional and scientific instruments ....................... 31 5 1.1 .5 .9 (2/) .5 (2/) 1.5 (2/) 6 1 1.6 (2/) (2/) (2/V (£/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 26 1.4 .9 .5 1.5 5 1.5 (£/) (2/) (2/) Other manufacturing .................... 29 1.4 .9 .3 1.5 8 1.6 1.0 .6 1.5 Nonraanufacturing....... ................. 29 1.2 .7 .3 1.5 12 1.6 .7 .5 1.2 Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing......... . 3 4 22 2.3 1.0 1.3 (2/) (2/) .6 (2/) (2/) .3 (2/) (2/) 1.3 ____ ___ . ____ ____ ____ — 12 — — .7 — .5 1,2 — 1.6 — 1.8 (2/) (2/) (2/) — — 1/ Excludes 213 companies that failed to report number of research employees or number of research engineers and scientists. The numbers of reporting companies in the three size groups do not add to the totals shown in column 1, which include companies not reporting their total employment. 2/ Means are not shown for fewer than three companies; medians and quartiles are not shown for fewer than eight companies. */ Means were computed by dividing the aggregate number of supporting personnel by the number of research engineers and scientists for each specified group of companies. They thus reflect to a great extent the experience of the largest organizations in the group. This should be borne in mind in comparing the means with the median ratios, which were computed from rankings of ratios for individual companies. (3-15• Average number of supporting personnel per research engineer or s c ie n tis t by industry and size of p rofessional research s ta f f, January 1952 Industry All reporting companies Companies with professional research staff of— 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 All Industries .... ............... 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 Manufacturing ........................ 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 Food and kindred products ............ Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied products ............. Chemicals and allied products ......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ...................... Drugs and medicines ................ Soap, cleaners, etc.......... ...... Paint, varnish, etc........... ..... Other chemical products ............ 1.0 1.6 .9 .9 .8 1.2 •9 .6 •9 .6 .7 .7 .5 1.9 1.2 .7 1.0 1.1 .8 .8 .8 .7 .5 .7 .4 .7 .5 .6 jS .4 .6 (1/) .9 1.1 .8 1.2 G/) G/) .8 Petroleum refining......... ..... . Rubber products ..................... Stone, clay,and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ............. Fabricated metal products ............. Machinery (except electrical) ..... . Electrical machinery ................ Transportation equipment......... . Motor vehicles and equipment ...... . Aircraft and parts .......... ...... Other transportation equipment ........ 1.5 .9 1.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 2.0 1.7 5.2 1.5 .7 .8 1.3 1.2 1.1 .1.3 .9 .7 .7 .8 1.8 G/) 1.0 1.9 2.4 2.1 .6 .6 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.5 1.9 2.0 .6 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.9 1.7 G/) G/) Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments ..................... 1.4 1.2 1.3 .9 1.4 2.2 1.8 O/) 1.4 1.4 1.2 Other manufacturing ........... . 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.0 Nonmanufacturing ...................... Commercial consulting firms ........... Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing ............... .9 1.6 1 / Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 1.0 .2 1.0 .8 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.3 2.3 5.6 .9 .7 1.4 1.9 .9 a/) G/) G/) .7 1.1 .5 G/) G /) G/) G/) G/) 2.0 .4 1.5 1.6 2.4 G/) 1.4 — 75 to 124 125 250 to to 499 249 500 to 999 1,000 or more 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 .7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.1 G/) _ _ — 1.1 _ _ G/) _ _ a/) G/) G/) _ _ _ — _ G/) G/) .9 1.0 1.0 G/) .8 G/) .8 — G/) G/) .7 — — G/) G/) .6 1.0 1.6 G/) G/) G/) — 1.3 G/) 2.3 0/) G/) 2.2 1.7 2.6 .2 a/) G/) G/> a/) 2.9 — 1.3 _ _ G/) (1/) 1.0 3.4 G/) 1.3 G/> G/) __ _ _ 2.5 1.6 _ 1.6 _ _ _ _ G/) 2.3 1.4 1.4 — 1.9 .8 Q /) •4 G/) G/) (l/) a/) _ G/) a/) 1.9 1.9 .8 .6 1.1 .6 1.3 .8 1.1 1.0 .8 .6 .7 1.0 1.2 •9 .6 .9 .8 .7 .4 .7 G/) 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 — — a/) G/) — G/) .8 1.9 — — _ 1.0 1.2 1.1 G/) Cl/) G/) 1.4 1.2 G/) G/) .Q G/) (1/) (I/) C-16. Cost of research, by industry and size of company, 1951 (thousands of dollars) ATT reporting companies Industry Companies with total employment of— 0 to 24 25 to 99 100 to 199 200 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 to 4,999 5,000 to 24,999 25,000 to 49,999 50,000 to 99,999 100,000 Not or reported more All industries. 1/ $1,804,529 $8,418 $34,523 $20,927 $69,461 $88,332 $236,866 $424,863 $317,686 $171,708 $397,168 $34,577 Manufacturing.. 1,624,687 2,080 10,319 12,509 49,818 62,157 218,765 420,093 316,329 171,570 (2/) (2/) (2/) — — — • — — Food and kindred products ......... .. Textile mill products and apparel... Paper and allied products.......... Chemicals and allied products.... . Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals.................... Drugs and medicines............... Soap, cleaners, etc.............. Paint, varnish, etc.............. Other chemical products.......... Other manufacturing. Nonmanufacturing..... Commercial consulting firms. Nonprofit research agencies. Other nonmanufacturing..... cost o ij e ^ s e M ^ l t ^ 19^51^ (2/) 2,659 131,34X5 44-*04.3 12^342 6,486 10,019 362 238 — 22 193 553 827 275 468 536 92,942 22,890 20,752 34,596 38,404 99,729 432,343 511.324 o»> ,r Professional and scientific instruments.......... ......... Photographic equipment and supplies...................... Other professional and scientific instruments................... 27 — (2/) 815 * Petroleum refining................. Rubber products..................... Stone, clay, and glass products.... Primary metal industries........... Fabricated metal products.......... Machinery (except electrical)...... Electrical machinery................ Transportation equipment.. Motor vehicles and equipment..... Aircraft and parts........ ....... Other transportation equipment.... 23,889 15,817 11,116 204,230 n 48 275 178 (2/) (2/) w x 432 205 88 906 273 1,176 963 (2/) 696 (2/) 145 93 — 2,024 165 359 377 8,190 464 176 278 10,741 5,297 6,753 4,952 31,618 898 393 259 (2/) 3,604 1,586 11,548 14,907 (2/) 1,519 0/) IgA 1,717 5,196 602 (2A (2/) 7,570 1,547 960 3,846 12,206 36,522 54,795 33,756 4,344 27,071 lg/) 1,063 (2/) 137 209 (2/) 2,154 916 3,215 234 1,694 981 377 542 3,267 3,822 16,206 2,454 540 459 610 753 3,122 4,720 10,871 14,568 234 2,126 13,119 IgA IgA IgA IgA IgA 2 , 3a 410,804 6,217 (2/) 91,813 453 2,689 1,940 9,403 8,860 9,360 30,794 68 (2/) 620 2,556 2,900 969 61,019 385 (2/) 1,320 6,847 5,960 24,842 139 523 1,226 1,981 179,842 6,338 24,204 8,418 19,643 44,193 37,577 98,072 5,210 808 320 17,343 3,712 3,H9 6,113 1,584 721 10,637 6,614 2,392 13,928 8,270 5,453 89,452 W X (2A 10,406 2,855 -25,146 10,313 9,980 6,030 11,432 22,945 45,207 132,145 11,236 118,199 2,710 (2/) (2/) (2/) — — — — (2/) — — — .— — — — (2/) ““ 2,731 (I/) — — — — (2/) (2/) 28,272 wx — — (2/) (2/) (2/) 8.501 (2/) 189,657 — 189,657 __ 600 (2/) — 93,174 2/0 (2/) i (2A — — (2A 43,501 (2 — A % (2/) 964 1.037 2^ 2^ (2/) "" 34,676 (2/) — — (2/) — (2/) — — -- 8,391 34,676 — — — (2/) 5,995 9,583 5,116 145 - — 134 26,175 18,101 (2/) 4,260 14,559 7,356 4,770 1,357 138 (2/) — __ — — (2/) (2/) — 4,770 — 1,357 — — 138 disclosing figures for individual companies, but these dat a are included in totals. (2/) 630 (2/) C-17. Cost of research, by industry and size of professional research s t a f i, 1951 (thousands of dollars) Companies with professional research staff of — Industry All reporting companies 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 All industries ........................... 1/*1,804,529 *19,466 $71,242 $80,021 $84,897 $67,469 Manufacturing ............................. 1,624,687 15,738 60,433 66,410 73,975 61,474 Food and kindred products ............... Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied products .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ......................... Drugs and medicines ............. . Soap, cleaners, etc. ................ . Paint, varnish, etc................... Other chemical products .............. 131,340 44, 043 12,342 6,486 10,019 494 534 196 178 325 1,973 1,867 190 927 2,570 Petroleum refining ...................... Rubber products ........................ Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ............... Fabricated metal products .............. Machinery (except electrical) ........... Electrical machinery ................... Transportation equipment ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts ...... ............. Other transportation equipment ....... 92,942 22,890 20,752 34,596 38,404 99,729 432,343 511,324 94,303 410,804 6,217 525 247 639 431 1,287 1,019 2,281 2,128 572 926 630 1,101 11,010 Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientitic instruments ....................... 91,813 30,794 1,591 182 5,746 1,458 6,973 61,019 1,409 Other manufacturing.......... .......... 24,842 Nonmanufacturing.............. ......... Commercial consulting firms ......... . Nonprofit research agencies ............ Other nonmanufacturing ................. 23,889 15,817 11,116 204,230 974 1,059 393 1,727 2,890 1,793 1,490 7,527 1,722 1,617 1,518 6,964 10,223 2,672 • 769 1,312 591 75 to 125 to 124 249 52,503 _ (2/0 21,658 8,351 (2/) __ _ _ _ _ (2/0 (2/) (2/) 2,141 (2/) 1,351 (2/0 (2/) _ _ _ _ — “ 679 1,659 G/> 4,421 3,522 (2/) (2/0 10,924 (2/0 (2/0 23,078 (2/0 (2/) 2,269 <£/> 1,624 857 2,173 7,388 9,614 13,512 10,824 5,689 2,491 2,278 (2/) — 1,271 7,664 11,220 15,965 6,037 2,982 (2/) (2/) (2/) — 3,961 — — (2/0 (2/) 6,020 7,650 1,902 (2/) (2/) (2/0 22,433 (2/) (2/) (2/) — 19,199 (2/) 16,849 (2/) 6 0 20,674 17,357 29,351 (2/) (2/) 7,547 (2/) 3,662 (2/) (2/0 5,683 (2/0 4,288 (2/) (2/0 (2/) (2/) (2/) 1,437 4,160 1,302 4,030 — 3,847 9,143 179,842 3,728 10,809 13,611 10,922 5,995 12,906 19,361 44,193 37,577 98,072 2,434 225 1,069 7,491 620 2,698 8,053 1,232 4,326 5,647 1,828 3,447 2,976 (2/0 (2/0 (2/) 9,965 (2/) (2/0 (2/) $28,790 (2/) 36,651 (2/) (2/) Not re ported _ — — 36,147 16,646 2 >644 or more 227,809 3,068 2,754 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/0 4 >407 2,030 9,319 10,932 9,927 6 0 (2/) 1,000 180,523 (2/0 (2/) (2/) 8,350 680 500 to 999 $65,409 $199,884 $252,711 $ 194,122 $740,518 5,642 (2/) 4,224 11,187 1,915 3,044 1,625 5,144 250 to 499 (2/) 35,111 _ _ (2/0 (2/) 12,505 120,318 (2/) 6/0 (2/0 (2/) _ _ _ 39,924 78,397 ■ _ 78,397 — i _ _ _ _ (2/0 299,658 249,336 _ 249,336 681 29 (2/) 257 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/0 1,593 1,280 (2/) 2,336 (2/0 (2/0 (s7) 229 _ (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/0 — (2/) (2/) — — — 24,902 (2/) (2/) 7,132 (2/) 12,519 (2/) (2/) _ 3,970 2,627 535 (2/) (2/0 (2/) 923 1/ This total is based on reports from 1,772 companies. In addition, the study included 181 companies that failed to supply information on the cost of research in 1951* 2j Data withheld to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies, but these data are included in totals. ' C-18. Cost of Government-financed research as percent of to ta l research c o st, by industry and size of company , 1951 Companies with fewer than 500 employees All companies Number of companies reporting Mean i/ 1/ 1,630 A6.8 •10.0 1,302 AS.A 59 Upper quartile Number of companies reporting 0 71.4 8 88 57.6 22.0 0 90.0 9.2 '0 6 6 .4 611 59.9 20.0 0 90.0 0 .8 0 0 0 43 224 3.7 14.4 3.2 7.1 0 0 21.9 2.5 5.0 14 8 8 143 4.5 38.6 3.1 11.2 0 23.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 0 5.8 73 62 15 23 51 9.5 .4 2.9 9.8 10.2 0 0 0 7.9 0 .0 0 0 0 0 6.8 0 4*4 13.4 8.1 46 39 9 16 33 17.2 3.9 5.2 11.8 8.8 0 0 0 8.1 0 0 0 0 0 6.0 0 5.4 13.3 8.1 Petroleum refining ...................... Rubber products ......... ............... Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries •••••.......... Fabricated metal products ......... . Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical m a c h i n e r y ........... ........ Transportation equipment ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts ............ ....... Other transportation equipment........ 43 30 30 37 124 151 208 96 23 59 14 3.1 13.6 2.7 9.5 31.1 23.8 57.0 70.8 9.4 8 5 .I 52.8 0 21.7 0 .4 24.5 2.9 67.4 91.7 16.1 100.0 38.4 0 4.8 0 0 0 0 22.7 24.2 1.9 82.9 0 6.9 37.5 1.4 13.3 76.3 33.3 100.0 100.0 28.7 100.0 100.0 20 14 9 6 55 59 111 24 3 18 3 9.6 34.6 .1 61.4 78.0 53.5 80.8 73.3 31.8 77.7 77.1 3.4 31.7 ,0 (2/) 76.2 0 86.7 94.5 Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments.... ................... 136 21 57.3 29.1 50.0 100.0 13.6 13.9 94.6 1 00.0 100 16 76.2 93.1 115 73.0 47.0 13.6 82.3 84 Other manufacturing ..................... 80 54.9 12.7 0 73.3 Nonmanufacturing .......................... 328 50.6 14.2 0 Commercial consulting firms ......... . Nonprofit research agencies ............. Other nonmanufacturing ••••.... ......... 220 33 75 65.4 53.2 42.9 47.8 10.3 0 0 0 0 Industry All industries .................. . Manufacturing ............... .............. Food and kindred products ............... Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products ............... Chemicals and allied products ........... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals •••............. ......... Drugs and medicines .................. Soap, cleaners, etc................... Paint, varnish, etc.............. . Other chemical products .............. . See footnotes a t end o f tab le 41 Median Lower quartile 0 0 Mean i/ Median .0 Lower quartile Upper quartile 13.0 (2/) 0 0 0 (2/) 0 0 33.3 40.0 C2/) 100.0 4 2 .9 100.0 (2/) (2/) (2/) 50.0 13.6 10.0 100.0 100.0 70.9 50.0 13.6 94.6 40 73.4 41.5 0 98.5 90.3 277 54.9 26.2 0 9 4 .9 100.0 50.0 10.0 208 29 40 62.9 48.4 17.9 50.0 7.3 0 0 0 100.0 0 6 0 .0 0 (2/) 100.0 66.4 100.0 100.0 (2/) 100.0 48.6 10.5 C-18. Cost of Government-financed research as percent of to ta l research co st, by industry and size of company, 1951—Continued Companies with 500 to 4,999 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean^/ Median Lower quartile Companies with 5>000 or more employees Upper quartile Number of companies reporting */ Mean-' Median Lower quartile Upper quartile All industries .......................... 507 49.9 5.7 0 5 0 .0 186 45.1 1.2 0 26.2 Manufacturing.................... ....... -480 ■48.0 6.2 0 50.0 175 45.7 1.7 0 26.3 Food and kindred products ............. Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied products ......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ............ ............ Drugs and medicines .................. Soap, cleaners, etc.................. Paint, varnish, etc.................. Other chemical products .............. 28 23 26 55 .7 25.1 4.3 4.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 3.1 1.4 16 9 9 21 4.6 2.6 2.2 7.6 0 .8 0 .3 0 0 0 0 r 0 19.2 17 16 3 4 15 5.1 •4 17.9 6.7 12.3 ,0 0 (2/0 (2/) 0 0 0 (2/) (2/) 0 1.3 0 (2/) (2/) 0 9 6 3 3 — 9.7 (3/) .9 10.5 — 2.7 (2/) (2/) (2/) — 0 (2/) (2/) (2/) 6.8 (2/) (2/) (2/) Petroleum r e f i n i n g ....... ............. Rubber products ....................... Stone, clay, and glass products ....... Primary metal i n d ustries.... .......... Fabricated metal products .............. Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical machinery .................. Transportation equipment .............. Motor vehicles and e q u i p m e n t..... . Aircraft and parts ................... Other transportation equipment ...... 8 9 13 17 50 71 82 a 10 23 8 .8 25.7 6.9 27.8 30.1 38.7 65.6 0 20.5 0 1.3 14.6 4.0 55.3 97.1 23.4 100.0 0 8.8 0 0 0 0 11.2 0 2.1 11.1 .8 4.2 15.0 8.6 54.0 68.7 8.2 83.6 9.9 (2/) (2/) .4 10.2 2.9 54.4 85.9 2.5 95.1 (2/) 0 (2/) (2/) 0 0 0 1.6 (2/) (2/) .9 Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies •• Other professional and scientific instruments ...................... 28 4 50.4 68.3 32.6 24 Other manufacturing............ . 6.2 90.1 0 100.0 100.0 14 4 7 11 13 20 10 29 9 17 3 (2/) 8.6 (2/) 66.4 (2/) 5 1 54.4 (2/) 46.6 (2/) (2/) (2/) 4 3.0 0 32.0 7 0 0 44.4 11 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/0 0 _ — 11 91.2 28.6 98.7 84.3 29 63.4 Nonmanufacturing ......................... 27 61.6 Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing ................. 2 4 21 (2/) 55.5 61.7 6 9.6 W X (£/) 0 24.2 0 25.1 9 .9 33.3 50.0 19.3 87.8 100.0 28.7 ,0 2.5 4 .8 46.8 2.5 .9 85.9 (2/) 9.3 68.8 97.6 16.1 99.1 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 85.3 (2/) (2/) (2/) 18.3 (2/) (2/) (2/) 33.9 0 0 0 — 33.9 _ 0 _ _ 0 0 31.4 1/ Excludes 323 companies that failed to report total research cost or Government-financed research cost. The number of companies in the three size groups do not add to the totals shown in column 1, which include companies not reporting total employment. 2/ Means are not shown for fewer than 3 companies; medians and quartiles are not shown for fewer than 8 companies. 3/ Less than 0.05 percent. */ Means were computed by dividing the aggregate cost of Government-financed research by the total research cost for each specified group of companies. They thus reflect to a great extent the experience of the largest organizations in the group. This should be borne in mind in comparing the means with the median percentages, which were computed from rankings of percentages for individual companies. C-19 Cost of Government-financed research as percent of total research cost* by industry and else of professional research staff, 1951 Companies with 15 to 29 Drofessional research staff of— 125 50 30 75 to to to to 49 74 124 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 .26,0, ..55*.4_ 1,000 or more 0 to 4 n 34.4 35.6 40.5 37.0 ..JL-iL— 33.4 41.1 33.7 2.2 15.9 6.6 5.3 33.0 1.0 31.2 1.7 10.8 40.0 3.7 14.4 3.2 7.1 0 34.6 9.0 8.1 34.6 14.0 (1/) 3.0 9.1 30.8 ao ao (i/) 6.5 27.2 — (A/) 37.8 0 (I/) — 1.0 32.3 — — — 19.1 55.6 -— — (A/) 56.7 — — — (A/) 9.5 0.4 2.9 9.8 10.2 7.5 4.0 1.6 6.0 6.2 8.8 4.5 0 9.1 18.5 1.1 0 (1/) 6.5 7.5 12.6 0 OQ (i/) 13.8 8.8 (1/) 0/ 00 O) 8.2 (I/) (I/) .3 (I/) (A/) ao ao (A/) (A/) (A/) — — — — — — Petroleum refining............ ...... Rubber products .................... . Stone, clay, and glass products ....... Primary metal industries ............. Fabricated metal products ............ Machinery (except electrical) ......... Electrical machinery ................. Transportation equipment ............. Motor vehicles and equipment ........ Aircraft and parts ................. Other transportation equipment ...... 3.1 13.6 2.7 9.5 31.1 23.8 57.0 70.8 9.4 85.1 52.8 13.0 22.3 2.1 26.4 47.6 31.1 49.9 64.9 33.6 72.0 a/) 31.9 32.1 6.0 20.1 23.4 69.3 49.3 18.1 84.5 83.2 5.0 (A/) — (A/) 50.4 22.5 65.1 28.4 11.4 (A/) (A/) 00 — ao a/) 27.7 65.0 76.3 ao ao a/) (A/) (A/) <i/> 2.9 57.3 12.8 53.3 60.3 O0 99.2 —• 5.2 — — ao (A/) 83.3 5.3 21.4 2.7 43.6 43.9 16.3 58.1 48.8 11.7 73.3 39.9 69.8 40.4 (A/) 99.1 — — — — 70.8 88.4 — 88.4 — — — — — — (A/) 51.9 79.7 — 79.7 — Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments .................. . 57.7 29.1 47.5 36.2 60.8 85.3 63.5 (1/) 82.1 (A/) -47.8 (1/) 45.0 ao ao ao (A/) — — ao (3/) 73.0 49.1 52.2 63.6 79.5 35.3 46.3 a/) — — a/) Other manufacturing .................. 54.9 27.0 40.8 47.2 31.3 — 45.7 79.7 — — — Nonmanufacturing ...................... 50.6 38.0 49.2 43.0 51.4 18.4 57.3 70.8 67.0 (A/) ao 65.4 53.2 42.9 45.9 0 27.2 58.9 24.8 25.2 63.0 40.9 3.4 88.9 10.1 12.0 79.7 ao Q/> (1/) -57,9 78.5 ao ao All reporting companies Industry All industries _T...................... 4-6.8 l6.tr Food and kindred products ... ......... Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied products ............ Chemicals and allied products ......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ...................... Drugs and medicines ................. Soap, cleaners, etc...... .......... paint, varnish, etc....... ..... . Other chemical products ............. Commercial consulting firms ........... Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing ............... 1/ a Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 5 4 3 88 0 -2.5 ao .9 ao a/) 49.4 92.6 93.0 (1/) 99.3 -- a/) 57.0 0/) — /) (A — a/) £*20. Cost of research as percent of s a le s, by industry and size of company, 1951 All companies Industry Number of companies reporting Mean*/ ' Median Companies with fewer than 500 employees Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean t / Median Lower quartile Upper quartile 1,703 2.0 2.8 1.0 12.8 922 6.9 7.4 2.4 Manufacturing............................... 1,377 2.0 2.0 .8 5.6 648 4.3 4.0 1.8 11.8 Food and kindred products ................. Textile mill products and apparel ......... Paper and allied products • ........... . Chemicals and allied products ........ . Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .................. .......... Drugs and m e d i c i n e s .... ................ Soap, cleaners, etc. .................. Paint, varnish, etc. .................... Other chemical products ................ 64 45 46 246 .3 .9 .5 2.5 .3 .6 .4 2.4 .1 .2 .2 1.3 .6 1.4 .7 4.7 15 11 9 162 .5 1.3 .9 2.5 1.3 1.2 .6 2.6 .2 .5 .3 1.3 6.2 2.0 3.3 5.8 81 65 16 29 55 3.0 3.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.1 3.5 1.7 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.0 5.0 5.8 2.7 3.2 3.3 53 42 9 21 37 2.7 3.2 2.5 2.4 1.8 2.4 3.6 1.6 2.4 2.4 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.2 8.9 6.6 4.6 3.9 4.2 Petroleum refining .............. . Rubber products ••••...................... Stone, clay, and glass products ........... Primary metal industries..... ............ Fabricated metal products ............ . Machinery (except electrical) ............ Electrical machinery ....••............... Transportation e q u i p m e n t ...... ........... Motor vehicles and e q u i p m e n t .... . Aircraft and parts ••........... . Other transportation equipment ......... 41 31 33 39 131 164 213 96 24 .6 1.8 1.1 .6 1.4 1.5 4.2 3.2 1.3 7.7 .7 .4 .8 .4 .3 .7 .8 1.9 1.1 .4 3.2 .2 1.5 3.5 2.4 1.2 3.7 3.2 11.1 10.8 1.9 18.8 3.0 18 14 10 7 57 64 112 24 3 19 2 3.0 3.9 2.6 2.5 5.4 3.4 7.4 6.5 1.9 9.1 e/) 1.6 3.3 2.5 (2/) 3.4 3.0 6.4 4.0 .6 1.9 *4 (2/) 1.4 1.1 2.7 2.7 14 .6 .9 1.3 .4 .9 1.5 6.4 4.5 1.2 12.7 .9 Professional and scientific instruments ... Photographic equipment and supplies ..... Other professional and scientific instruments .................... ...... 142 22 5.8 4*8 8.3 7.9 3.4 4.3 20.0 20.0 105 17 120 6.4 8.3 3.1 19.6 1.8 *4 5.0 All Industries .............................. Other manufacturing ••••............... . y 60 W ) W ) 4.1 «/) 3.3 ft/) 3.0 6.8 4-0 (2/) 10.8 6.0 14*9 9.4 (*/) 12.5 (V) 11.8 14.8 10.7 20.0 4.8 5.0 21.7 21.7 88 11.1 10.8 4.7 22.4 40 4.1 4.3 1.8 25.0 27.5 73.4 25.0 94.3 51.3 83.2 5.6 77.8 100.0 6.7 40.0 64 1.1 Nonmanufacturing .......... .................. 326 1.8 66.7 n.i 92.3 274 Commercial consulting firms •• ••........... Nonprofit research agencies ............... Other nonmanufacturing .................... 222 29 75 47.4 77.4 100.0 2.6 38.7 85.9 .7 93.8 100.0 8.1 207 26 a See footnotes a t end of tab le 8 9.8 1.0 37.5 93.9 80.2 100.0 2.6 28.6 C-20. Cost of research as percent of s a le s, by industry and size o f company, 1951—Continued Companies with 5,000 or more employees Companies with 500 to 4,999 employfBBB Industry Number of companies reporting Mean!/ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Meani/ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile All industries ............................ 536 2.0 1.3 0.5 2.9 200 1.9 0.7 0.3 2.0 Manufacturing ...................... ....... 509 1.9 1.3 .5 2.8 188 2.0 .8 .3 2.3 Food and kindred products .............. Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied products .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .......................... Drugs and medicines ................... Soap,cleaners, etc..................... Paint, varnish, etc.................... Other chemical products .............. 32 24 28 58 .3 .9 .5 2.4 •2 •4 .4 1.7 .1 •2 •2 1.0 .6 1.0 •6 2.7 17 9 9 22 .3 .8 .4 2.6 .1 .1 .1 1.7 .4 1.0 •6 3.9 17 16 4 5 16 2.1 3.9 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.8 3.2 T2/> (2/) 1.0 1.3 1.3 (2/) (2/) .9 2.3 4.7 (2/) 10 6 3 3 3.2 3.0 1.0 .7 — 3.7 (2/> (2/) (2/) 1.8 (2/) (2/) (2/) — (2/) (2/) (2/) Petroleum r e f i n i n g ....... .............. Rubber products ......................... Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ............... Fabricated metal products .............. Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical machinery .................... Transportation equipment ................ Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts .................... Other transportation equipment ....... 8 10 13 16 55 74 87 42 11 23 8 1.3 .7 .7 .8 1.1 1.8 4.1 6.1 1.5 15.6 1.6 .4 .8 •6 .6 1.0 1.4 2.7 2,2 1.8 5.9 .6 .3 .3 .4 .2 .5 .7 1.5 .8 .4 1.3 .1 1.3 1.3 .8 1.2 1.8 2.2 5.5 7.9 2.1 17.1 3.0 15 4 8 13 13 24 11 30 9 17 4 .5 .9 1.3 .4 .6 1.3 7.1 4*4 1.2 12.5 .6 .5 (2/) 1.2 .4 .4 1.0 5.2 4.8 .7 11.0 (2/0 .3 (2/) .4 .2 .3 .c s 1.7 .7 .4 7.5 .6 (2/) 1.4 .8 .6 1.5 6.3 11.0 1.3 18.0 m m Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments ......................... 29 4 3.8 4.8 3.6 (2/0 1.0 (2/) 6.7 (2/) 6 1 5.8 (2/) (2/) (2/) Q/y m (2/) (2/) 25 3.7 2.5 .8 5.4 5 7.6 (2/) ti/y <2/0 Other manufacturing...... .............. 33 1.4 .8 .2 2.8 7 .5 (2/) m <2/) 27 5.2 1.8 •4 29.0 94.2 1.9 (2/) (2/) 1.5 Nonmanufacturing..................... . Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ............. Other nonmanufacturing .................. 1/ three size 2/ 2/ 3 3 21 W ) (2/) •2 m 1.6 4.5 ,(£/) (2/) 3.0 3 .3 2.4 — .8 12 .2 ___ ___ ___ — 12 — — .8 .2 4.7 .6 (2/) _ — <3/) ___ — .6 Excludes 250 companies that failed to report total research cost or value of sales (or services). The numbers of reporting companies in the groups do not add to the totals shown in'column 1, which include companies not reporting their total employment. Means are not shown for fewer than three companies; medians and quartiles not shown for fewer than eight companies. Less than 0.05 percent. Means were computed by dividing the aggregate cost of research by the total value of sales for each specified group of companies. They thus reflect to a great extent the experience of the largest organizations in the group. This should be borne in mind in comparing the means with the median percentages, which were computed from rankings of ratios for individual companies. */ C-21. CoFt of rerearch as percent of sa le s, by industry and size of professional research s ta f f, 1951 Industry All reporting companies Com]sanies with professional research staff of— 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more All industries ........................ 2.0 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.6 2.2 5.1 Manufacturing ....................... , Food and kindred products ........... Textile mill products and apparel ... Paper and allied products .......... Chemicals and allied products ..... . Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ..................... Drugs and medicines .............. Soap, cleaners, etc............... Paints, varnish, etc.............. Other chemical products .......... 2.0 .3 .8 .2 .5 1.3 .4 (i/) .4 2.0 1.2 (1/) (1/0 (1/) 1.4 1.5 .5 (1/0 1.5 2.1 7.0 -- .... 1.7 1.0 .1 .7 .6 2.0 1.0 .5 2.5 .6 .2 .2 .3 1.2 3.7 2.3 (A/) (A/) 3.0 3.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.0 1.8 .9 1.9 .9 3.1 1.1 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.4 2.9 (1/0 2.0 1.6 1.8 3.0 (1/) (i/> 1.9 2.6 4.2 (1/) (1/0 <1/0 (1/) 4.1 (1/) 4.6 (1/) (2/) (A/) (A/) Petroleum refining ................. Rubber products ......... ............ Stone, clay, and glass p r o d u c t s..... Primary metal industries ............ Fabricated metal products .......... Machinery (except electrical) ...... Electrical m a c h i n e r y .... ........... Transportation equipment ............ Motor vehicles and equipment ..... Aircraft and parts ............... . Other transportation equipment .... .6 .9 1.3 .4 .9 1.5 6.4 4.5 1.2 12.7 .9 .9 .9 1.4 •4 .6 1.3 2.3 1.1 .6 2.9 1.0 .7 1.0 .6 .3 1.5 1.3 2.7 .8 .8 1.7 .4 (1/) .8 .8 .9 .6 1.2 3.0 1.3 1.0 5.2 1.3 5.8 4.8 3.5 4.3 3.9 5.8 3.6 6.4 3.4 7 1.1 r * Nonmanufacturing ........................ 1.8 Commercial consulting firms .......... Nonprofit research agencies ..... .... Other nonmanufacturing.............. . 47.4 89.8 1.0 Professional and scientific instruments Photographic equipment and supplies . Other professional and scientific instruments ............ ..........T Other manufacturing .................. mo (1/) % (I/O .3 — .8 .9 1.6 4.5 1.6 1.0 (1/) (1/) (1/) (1/) .9 3.3 .5 (1/0 18.7 (1/) 3.9 (1/) 5.5 (1/0 I£> T 10.1 Q A r J7 1*4 -5.U 1.0 .6 o -50 7 4*1 O 9 30.3 13.3 .3 30.0 88.6 .1 no 91.0 (1/) (A/) 7 rs 83.5 q T / 1.4 — (17) a /) (17) .2 4.0 1.9 3.7 1.3 (1/) 10.4 — . v .u (A/) 1 7 2.0 (1/) (1/0 •a "* (1/) (1/) 2.1 (1/) c 1 / Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. ♦ — (I/O — .5 (1/) 1.5 (1/0 (1/) 2.5 . 11.2 6.0 (1/0 10.0 (I/) .9 -- (1/) (1/) .. — __ — (1/0 (1/) — __ ..„ .... __ 10.9 2.1 24.8 (A/) 7.6 12.2 (i/) 11.8 24.8 12.2 6.8 (1/0 L (1/) — (1/) 1.2 4.9 O n 2,0 6.0 <i/> 75.1 (1/) (1/) 1.0 (I/O (1/) 91.0 O/) (A/) (A/) (A/) (A/) -- — (A/) (A/) (p) (A/) C-22. Average cost per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by industry and size of company, 1951 Companies with fewer thai1 500 employ ees All companies Industry Number of companies reporting Meanl/ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean t / Median Lower quartile Upper quartile All industries........................... ... 2/ 1,654 ♦21,900 #13,500 # 8,900 #20,500 877 #14,800 #11,300 #7,500 ♦18,000 Manufacturing............................... 1,346 22,500 14,200 9,200 21,000 621 15,600 11,100 7,500 18,000 Food and kindred products...... .......... Textile mill products and apparel........ Paper and allied products........ ........ Chemicals and allied products......... . Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals...................... •••••• Drugs and medicines....... ......... .. Soap, cleaners, etc..................... Paint, varnish, etc..................... Other chemical products................. 61 43 46 239 17,000 19,200 13,500 16,500 14,900 14,000 11,200 10,000 10,000 10,000 8,300 7,500 20,000 20,800 14,400 16,100 14 10 9 152 10,600 10,200 9,400 10,000 10,000 12,500 8,900 6,700 .5,000 6,000 6,700 10,900 12,500 10,000 13,500 77 67 15 26 54 18,200 16,400 14,900 7,100 13,500 11,000 10,000 11,500 9,700 10,000 7,000 7,100 8,100 6,600 7,800 16,300 16,600 15,600 11,700 16,500 49 42 8 19 34 12,200 10,200 10,000 9,900 12,500 8,300 8,500 8,700 9,900 9,800 6,600 5,000 8,000 7,500 6,700 15,000 12,300 11,500 11,500 14,300 Petroleum refining....................... . Rubber products........................... Stone, clay, and glass products........... Primary metal industries ................. . Fabricated metal products................. Machinery (except electrical)............ Electrical machinery.................. . Transportation equipment.................. Motor vehicles and equipment........... Aircraft and parts..................... Other transportation equipment......... 44 30 34 37 128 157 213 97 23 60 14 20,900 13,600 18,600 21,500 16,500 18,300 28,100 27,600 68,600 24,300 30,800 17,100 12,500 14,300 16,700 15,000 15,200 15,600 22,500 28,900 21,300 15,400 12,500 8,500 9,200 11,200 9,100 9,800 10,000 13,200 14,900 15,000 11,500 19,700 16,300 20,000 23,900 22,000 21,700 25,000 40,100 65,900 37.000 25.000 19 14 12 6 55 59 112 24 3 19 2 20,500 12,800 13,300 14,500 16,000 16,400 19,000 22,200 12,400 24.300 h/) 12,500 10,600 10,400 7,700 8,500 4,600 17,500 12,500 18.800 (2/) S o 7,700 6,700 9,400 9,200 b o 20,900 17,000 23,700 28,400 (2/) 25,000 12,500 11,400 12,500 10,500 14,200 16,600 m 16,300 b o b o 8,000 (2 /) (2 /) 20,000 21,900 137 22 17,900 17,300 14,200 15,200 8,000 7,200 20,000 20,000 97 16 16,000 15,600 14,800 7,500 5,800 115 18,200 13,700 8,300 20,000 81 16,200 11,700 7,700 19,300 80 19,400 13,100 10,000 21,100 38 15,000 11,300 8,600 18,400 Nonmanufacturing............................ 308 17,800 11,600 7,700 18,500 256 13,900 11,500 7,500 18,000 Commercial consulting firms............ .. Nonprofit research agencies.............. Other nonmanufacturing.................... 201 32 75 15,100 12,400 23,300 11,200 10,800 12,500 7,500 7,100 9,000 17,900 15,000 25,000 189 28 39 14,300 11,400 19,100 11,200 10,800 12,500 7,500 6,500 9,000 17,900 15,000 23,000 Professional and scientific instruments... Photographic equipment and supplies..... Other professional and scientific instruments...... ....... ........... . Other manufacturing.•••.••........ .. See footn otes at end o f table, C-22. Average co st per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by industry and siz e of company, 1951 - / Continued Companies with 5,000 or more employees Companies with 500 to 4-,999 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean t / Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean l / Lower quartile Upper quartile #18,000 # 13,200 # 23,700 Median All industries .......................... . 535 #18,100 #15,400 #10,000 $23,200 194 #24,300 Manufacturing................ ............. 508 18,400 15,500 10,000 23,200 183 24,400 18,300 13,500 23,700 Food and kindred products ................ Textile mill products and apparel ........ Paper and allied products .............. . Chemicals and allied products ............ Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ........... ................ Drugs and medicines ................ . Soap, cleaners, etc • ............... . Paint, varnish, etc. ................... Other chemical products ................ 32 22 28 60 15,000 19,600 12,100 14,700 15,300 13,900 12,100 13,000 10,000 10,000 8,300 9,300 20,200 16,700 14,300 16,800 14 10 9 22 18,200 20,000 15,400 17,900 17,200 19,400 12,700 15,200 13,900 10,000 12,000 19,300 22,700 18,ICO 19,100 17 18 4 4 17 12,900 17,600 12,600 10,800 13,600 11,100 16,400 2/0 b o 13,100 7,500 9,700 foo (2/) 7,800 14,400 20,500 h/) 10 6 3 3 — 19,600 16,900 15,700 5,100 — 182300 13,300 24,300 h/) (2/) (2/) b o d/0 d /) (2/) Petroleum refining ............... . Rubber p r o d u c t s .... ............... . Stone, clay, and glass products ......... Primary metal industries ................. Fabricated metal products ................ Machinery (except electrical) ............ Electrical machinery ............. ........ Transportation e q u i p m e n t .... ............ Motor vehicles and equipment ........... Aircraft and parts ............ Other transportation e q u i pment.... . 8 10 13 17 54 75 86 41 10 23 8 17,900 18,100 13,700 16,800 15,900 20,900 18,100 27,300 31,100 26,000 49,400 15,100 15,800 11,500 13,100 15,500 16,200 17,100 24,600 33,700 24,500 11,600 13,300 7,700 9,000 10,300 10,100 10,000 12,200 16,300 11,800 17,300 5,000 17,500 27,000 18,400 20,500 22,800 21,700 25,000 37,000 63,900 27,500 16 4 8 12 13 21 11 30 9 17 4 21,000 13,400 19,700 22,600 17,800 16,600 32,400 27,700 75,500 19,000 b o 18,600 17,900 18,000 20,200 19,100 23,300 65,900 24,100 2 4 ,100 21,500 Professional and scientific instruments .. Photographic equipment and supplies .... Other professional and scientific instruments ....................... . 31 5 14,900 10,300 15,400 8,900 19,000 6 1 26 16,900 15,000 8,800 20,000 Other manufacturing ..................... • 31 21,700 15,700 11,300 22,700 27 16,900 11,700 8,200 19,900 Non manufacturing................. . Commercial consulting firms .............. Nonprofit research agencies .......... Other nonmanufacturing ................... 2 4 21 (2/) 3,000 25,500 b o (27) 10,000 (2/) (2/) (2/) 7,500 <2n 29,300 25,000 b o w x 16,600 (3/) d/) 20,000 h/) h/) 22,700 24,100 20,000 28,500 24,500 43,800 74,900 42.300 ?2/> 12,900 12,300 12,000 13,900 15,600 14,900 11,300 15,800 h/) 19,600 h/) (2/) (2/) (2 /) (2/) (2/) (2/) 5 19,500 (2/) (2/) (2/) 7 17,100 (2/) (2/) (2/) 11 22,100 12,900 10,500 15,300 — (2/) 25,000 9,400 — 11 mi 22,100 •M* — 12,900 h/) M. — 10,500 — 15,300 1/ Cost figures rounded to the nearest $100. . . .. j.. ^ * .. 2/ Excludes 299 companies that failed to report total research cost or number of research engineers ana scientists. The number of reporting companies in the three size groups do not add to the totals shown in column 1, which include companies not reporting their total employment. 3/ Means are not shown for fewer than three companies; medians and quartiles are not shown for fewer than eight companies. */ Means were computed by dividing the total cost of research by the average number of research engineers and scientists for each specified group of companies. They thus reflect to a great extent the experience of the largest organizations in the group. This should be borne in mind in comparing the means with the median ratios, which were computed from rankings of ratios for individual companies. C-23. Average co st per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by industry and siz e o f professional research s t a f f , 1951 1 / Industry Companies with professional research staff of- - All reporting companies 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more All industries ............................ $21,900 $15,500 $17,700 $17,800 $17,800 $17,100 $14,500 $21,000 $24,900 $22,500 $25,000 Manufacturing ............................. 22,500 16,300 17,900 18,100 18,800 17,600 13,500 21,500 26,200 23,900 25,1°0 Food and kindred products ............ .. Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied products ........... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ......................... . Drugs and medicines ................... Soap, cleaners, etc.................... Paint, varnish, etc.................... Other chemical products ............... 17,000 19,200 13,500 16,500 18,000 17,600 17,900 12,300 (2/) — 19,300 — — — 13,100 (2/) (2/) 13,900 — — 12,600 e/> (2/) (2/) 12,900 14,800 12,300 10,700 27,300 (2/) 11,700 14,200 — 19,600 9,900 13,600 10,700 13,000 19,400 G/> G /) 13,600 14,800 15,300 14,100 (2/) — (2/) 19,300 (2/) Petroleum refining ...................... Rubber products ......................... Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ............... Fabricated metal products ............. . Machinery (except electrical) .......... Flectrical m a c h i n e r y ................... Transportation e q u i p m e n t ......... ...... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts .................... Other transportation equipment ...... Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies.... Other professional and scientific i n s t r u m e n t s .......... .................. Other manufacturing Nonmanufacturing ........................ ..................... ......... C o m m e r c i a l c o n s u l t i n g f i r m s ............... N o n p r o f i t r e s e a r c h a g e n c i e s ............... O t h e r n o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g ..................... 1/ 2/ 18,200 16,400 14,900 7,100 13,500 11,600 16,300 9,900 9,000 14,600 19,600 13,100 12,200 8,600 8,6 00 12,100 G/) 12,700 15,900 19,500 8,800 &) (2/) (2/) p ) (2/) 16,000 — — <2/) (2/) 13,000 — 20,500 10,400 30,300 (2/) — — — 15,000 20,900 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 20,000 — — (2/) (?/) — 14,500 56,400 (2/) 31,600 (2/) 12,300 10,000 23,600 16,500 16,800 19,700 41,600 54,700 25,200 46,400 23,200 (£/) — 11,900 15,900 24,500 19,500 27,900 20,900 24,300 30,800 17,700 35,500 63,600 25,000 45,000 15,500 17,900 14,800 16,700 20,700 22,200 9,000 17,700 20,200 16,200 18,500 17,900 17,300 15,000 15,200 18,100 31,000 17,000 (.2/0 18,700 (2/) 15,400 13,900 G/) (£/) 18,200 5,000 15,900 17,600 19,700 14,100 18,100 (2/) 19,400 15,500 19,100 13,600 29,000 (?/) 20,100 17,800 . 12,900 17,000 16,900 12,900 13,800 20,600 17,400 17,200 15,100 12,400 23,300 12,100 12,500 15,500 17,000 12,400 17,900 16,300 13,200 19,700 13,000 10,100 5,00a 14,400 C2/) (2/) 23,100 18,500 (2/) (2/) e o (2/) 20,900 13,600 18,600 21,500 16,500 18,300 28,100 27,600 1 68,600 Cost figures rounded to the nearest $100. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 13,000 21,300 22,700 14,100 12,600 G/> G /) (2/) — G/) 19,200 12,000 17,800 18,600 29,500 (2/) 25,100 — — G/> (2/) 11,600 9,200 (2/) (2/) (2/) A /] 26,600 ' 18,700 28,900 (2/) 31,000 — G/> — G J) — — (2/) (2/) — — — — (2/) 14,700 — — — — 21,400 37,200 — 37,200 — (2/) (2/) — — — — — — — — — (2/) 36,300 20,800 — 20,800 — &;> — — (2/) CS/) — (2/) — — — (2/) (2/) — — (2/) — (2/) C-24. Average cost per research engineer or s c ie n tis t on Government-financed research, T-vtr 4 nr?T»«: + T»v a r v l c i <7.A n f* ( * n m n f t n v . 1 0 * 5 1 _/ 275235 0 - 5 3 All companies Industry Number of companies reporting Mean hi Median Companies with fewer than 500 employees Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mear£/ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile 2/ 813 *23,900 *11,400 $ 6,800 *20,300 433 *15,800 $10,600 $6,000 * 19,500 657 24,500 11,700 7,000 20,900 292 17,700 10,500 6,000 20,000 Food and kindred products.................... Textile mill products and apparel......... . Paper and allied products................... Chemicals and allied products............... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals..... ........................ . Drugs and medicines....................... Soap, cleaners, etc....................... Paint, varnish, etc. .................... . Other chemical products................ . 7 IB 10 61 4,200 31,900 12,000 22,400 a/) 13,900 8,500 8,300 (2/0 3,000 4,000 5,000 (2/) 30,000 16,200 15,500 3 3 — 30 4,800 14,800 — (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 11,600 6,300 5,000 12,000 27 8 5 10 11 30,700 8,400 10,400 7,300 13,900 9,500 5.000 5,300 3,000 (2/0 3,800 5,000 17,500 6,700 6,300 5,000 12,000 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 10,000 13,300 14 4 2 5 5 13,800 11,100 (2/0 9,100 9,300 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) Petroleum refining.......................... Rubber products............................. Stone, clay, and glass products............. Primary metal industries.................... Fabricated metal products................... Machinery (except electrical).............. . Electr ic al machinery...................... . Transportation equipment.................... Motor vehicles and equipment............. . Aircraft and parts........................ Other transportation equipment............ 18 18 10 IS 71 66 158 77 17 51 9 15,800 9,300 9,300 20,300 14,900 21,700 29,400 24,000 34,200 23,700 42,500 18,200 12,500 11,000 20,000 18,800 18,000 22,400 30,100 16,000 30,100 28,400 6 8 — 8,400 9,100 (2/) 9,400 16,700 11,300 20,300 10,000 5,000 6,000 2,000 4,000 7,500 7,400 8,300 10,000 8,000 12,500 4,500 3 32 23 84 18 2 14 2 18,500 16,700 18,700 18,800 22,400 (2/) (2/) 13,800 9,300 11,000 14,600 (l/) 14.S00 (2/) Professional and scientific instruments..... Photographic equipment and supplies....... Other professional and scientific instruments............................. 89 16 19,800 13,300 12,400 13,500 7,500 7,200 23,200 21,900 64 12 18,400 21,000 10,600 14,300 73 21,100 11,900 7,000 24,500 52 17,600 Other manufacturing............ ......... 36 17,200 10,300 5,700 19,100 18 Nonmanufacturing............................... 156 20,100 11,200 6,200 20,300 Conunerc ial consulting firms.................. Nonprofit research agencies.............. . Other nonmanufacturing...................... 121 17 18 15,700 12,800 32,300 11,200 8,400 29,000 6,700 4,300 6,000 17,100 11,400 33,500 All Industries................................ Manufacturing.......... ..................... . See footnotes at end o f ta b le. I2I) 6,700 10,100 11,000 9,400 9,200 12,100 12,200 11,900 12,600 (2/) h/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 5,000 (2/) 6,700 5,000 7,500 8,000 (2/) (2/) 10,600 (2/) 25,000 15,800 21,800 28,400 h/) 8,000 16,300 (2/) h/) 6,000 4,500 21,300 21,900 10,300 6,000 21,100 14,700 12,900 7,100 19,100 141 13,700 10,900 5,900 16,700 117 14 10 14,500 10,800 17,000 11,200 7,100 10,200 6,700 4,300 5,000 17,100 10,700 29,900 22,300 C-2A. Average cost per research engineer or s c ie n tis t on Government-financed research by industry ana size of company, 1951 1 /—Continued Companies with 5,000 or more employees Companies with 500 to A,999 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean ^ Median Lower quartile Upper quartile 8,000 $ 24,500 7,900 22,400 (2/0. 31,300 Upper quartile $23,200 97 26,500 14,800 8,800 20,800 1 5 3 10 (2/) 16,700 13,600 35,000 2/ (2/) (2/0 <2/0 2/0 2/ (2/) 6 1 1 2 4 1 ,100 <2/0 (2/0 (2/) 16,100 9.300 (2/) 18,800 25,000 29,900 36,000 26,700 b o 10 A 2 6 6 11 9 23 6 16 1 12,900 (2 /) 8,300 (2/0 37,600 (2/0 A —■ 23,300 — 16,600 13,600 11,600 25,000 A 15 19,500 10,000 5*9000 17,900 3 10 22,000 27,900 8,400 32,200 1 $ 12,400 Manufacturing.......... .................. 2A5 20,800 12,200 Food and kindred products............... Textile mill products and apparel...... Paper and allied products............... Chemicals and allied products......... . Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals.......................... Drugs and medicines................... Soap, cleaners, etc................... Paint, varnish, etc........... ....... Other chemical products.............. 3 9 7 18 3,700 A0,100 11,100 lljAOO (2/) 11,000 (2/) 9,100 (2/) 3,800 15,500 6 3 2 3 A 13,A00 6,700 (3/) A,60Q 17,500 (2/0 (2/0 (2/0 Q/0 (2/5 (2/) (2/0 (2/ (2/) (2/) Petroleum refining...................... Rubber products.......... .............. Stone, clay, and glass products........ Primary metal industries................ Fabricated metal products............... Machinery (except electrical).......... Electrical machinery.................... Transportation equipment.............. . Motor vehicles and equipment........ . Aircraft and parts.............. . Other transportation equipment....... 1 A 6 8 29 31 62 3A 8 20 6 (2/) 10,500 5,500 1A,900 12,900 27,900 18,500 27,100 2A,000 26,100 7,A00 <2/> (2/) (2/) 1A,6o o 11,700 12,700 16,200 19,900 13,200 21,900 (2/) (2/0 (2/0 (2/) Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies... Other professional and scientific instruments........................ 18 A 12,900 8,900 1A 1/ Lower quartile $ 8,800 $ 21,000 Commercial consulting firms............. Nonprofit research agencies........ . Other nonmanufacturing................... Median $ 15,400 255 Nonmanufacturing.......... ................ Mean ^ $ 26,500 All industries........................... . Other manufacturing.................... . Number of companies reporting 2 3 5 (2/) 1A,A00 3A,500 (2 /; (2/0 (2/) $ (2/) 1,000 6,400 7,600 8,200 8,900 9,600 8,100 16,300 (2/0 (2/0 (2/) (2/) 19,000 15,000 (2 /) (2/0 (2/) 98 . - - 1 0/0 (2/0 (2/) -■* h/) 26,000 19,600 9,700 36,200- (-3/) 2$ (2/) w x w x (2 /) 23,500 12,400 5,000 (2/0 U/0 (2/0 (2/) **" (2/) 2$ (2/0 (2/) 13,800 8,300 19,000 (2/0 2/ 2/0 (2/) 16,000 18,200 17,A00 (2/) 28,200 b o (2 /) 2/ (2/) 2-0 (2/) 17,300 24,300 a , 900 20 p/> w x (2/0 (2 /) *”■ (2 /) 9,80 6,000 9,500 (2/) 16,200 (2/) b o 43,800 (2/) (2 /) -- (2/) — (2/) — 23,A00 (2/) (2/) (2/) 9,800 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 23,600 38,700 23.A00 (2/) b o (2/) (2/) (2/) «... .... « ... - - - - - - (2/) (2/) (2/) — (2/) C o s t f i g u r e s r o u n d e d to n e a r e s t |100. E x c l u d e s 7 2 7 c o m p a n i e s t h a t d i d n o t have a n y G o v e r n m e n t - f i n a n c e d r e s e arch. Al s o e x c l u d e s A 13 c o m p a n i e s tha t f a i l e d to r e p o r t e i t h e r c o s t o f G o v e r n m e n t - f i n a n c e d r e s e a r c h o r n u m b e r o f r e s e a r c h e n g i n e e r s and s c i e n t i s t s w o r k i n g o n G o v e r n m e n t - f i n a n c e d contracts. The n u m b e r o f r e p o r t i n g c o m p a n i e s in the t h ree size g r o u p s d o n o t a d d to th e t o tals shown in column 1, w h i c h i n c l u d e c o m p a n i e s n o t r e p o r t i n g their t o t a l e m p loyment. 2j M e a n s a r e n o t s h o w n f o r f e w e r t h a n three companies; m edians a n d q u a r t i l e s a r e n o t sh o w n f o r f e w e r than e i g h t companies. */ M e a n s w e r e c o m p u t e d b y d i v i d i n g the a g g r e g a t e c o s t of G o v e r n m e n t - f i n a n c e d r e s e a r c h b y the a v e r a g e n u m b e r o f r e s e a r c h e n g i n e e r s a n d s c i e n t i s t s w o r k i n g on G o v e r n m e n t c o n t r a c t s f o r e a c h s p e c i f i e d g r o u p o f companies. T h e y t hus r e f l e c t to a g r e a t e x t e n t the e x p e r i e n c e of the l a r g e s t o r g a n i z a t i o n s in the group . This s h o u l d b e b o r n e in m i n d in com p a r i n g the means w i t h the m e d i a n ra t i o s , w h i c h w e r e c o m p u t e d f r o m ran k i n g s o f rat i o s fo r i n d i v i d u a l 7/ companies. C-25. Average cost per research engineer or s c ie n tis t on Government-financed research, by industry and siz e of professional research s ta f f, 1951 1 / Industry AT 1 reporting companies Companies with professional research staff of — 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more 123,900 $16,400 $17,500 $19,800 $16,600 $16,700 $17,300 $23,900 $25,800 $28,200 $25,700 24,500 16,800 17,400 21,700 18,500 17,200 13,900 24,800 26,700 30,200 25,4-00 Food and kindred products ............. . Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and allied products .......... Chemicals and allied products Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals •••••........ ............ Drugs and medicines ................... Soap, cleaners, etc. •••••............ Paint, varnish, etc. ....... .......... Other chemical products .. ........... A,200 31,900 12,000 22,400 4,800 14,600 10,000 8,100 3,900 21,300 3,800 15,700 — — -- .. 50,200 15,700 10,500 — 12,700 10,800 (2/) (2/) 13,500 — ... — 17,000 30,700 8,400 10,400 7,300 13,900 10,800 6,700 6,000 — 17,400 7,500 33,300 15,500 -— (2/) 9,500 26,700 2,500 4,000 14,200 13,300 — 7,600 20,300 Petroleum r e f i n i n g ..... ................ Rubber products ....... ................. Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ................ Fabricated metal p r o d u c t s ......... ..... Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical machinery •••••••••••••••••••• Transportation equipment Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts ............... •••• Other transportation equipment ....... 15,800 9,300 9,300 20,300 14,900 21,700 29,400 5,000 8,500 8,600 24,500 19,500 16,700 18,100 13,500 8,200 14,400 13,800 •_ 10,200 9,800 4,000 12,100 23,000 20,400 42,000 46,800 25,400 100,000 9,500 — (2/) 18,300 13,200 19,900 27,300 (2/) — (2/) 18,300 9,800 15,800 15,900 23,300 (3/0 (2/) 12,600 17,700 8,200 34,200 23,700 42,500 10,700 13,300 9,000 22,200 18,000 12,100 14,300 37,000 32,000 26,000 65,600 ig/) ig/) (2/) — 24,900 — (2/) (2/) 17,700 (2/) 9,300 (2/) — ■ 39,200 18,000 31,500 (§/) 31,600 — (2/) All industries ................ ........ Manufacturing...... ....... ......... 24,000 ig/) ig/) h/) — — ig/) — <3/0 (2/) — — — (2/) ... — — ... — — 8,700 (2/) ig/) Ig/) — — — — — .. (2/) (2/) .. — — ■ 19,600 30,300 21,700 22,300 17,100 18,600 ig/) igj) ig/) ig/) 21,100 15,800 15,700 22,500 25,000 13,900 20,000 (2/) Other manufacturing................ . 17,200 8,600 16,000 11,000 17,000 — 11,300 Nonmanufacturing .......................... 20,100 14,800 17,900 14,800 11,600 14,200 29,500 1/ 2/ Cost figures rounded to the nearest $100. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 17,300 10,100 25,800 15,200 9,000 34,300 12,500 4,100 12,100 14,700 (2/) (2/) -38,900 ig/) (2/) 14,700 7,300 13,100 — 25,100 (2/) — (2/) — 19,800 13,300 15,700 12,800 32,300 — — (2/) 7.500 Professional and-scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments.... ................... Commercial consulting firms ....... ..... Nonprofit research agencies Other nonmanufacturing .......... — 57,900 15,900 — — (2/) (2/) 14,100 33.700 ig/) 31,300 —■ (2/) (2/) .. .. — (2/) 37,100 — 37,100 — .. .. — — (2/) 42,500 19,300 .. 19,300 — (2/) — —• — (2/) 21,600 — — — 20,300 22,400 (2/) ig/) .. ig/) (2/) 18,200 .. (2/0 Ig/) 23,800 ig/) — (2/) C-26. Average cost per research vtorxer, by inaustry and size of company, Companies with fewer than 500 employees All companies Industry All industries.#............................ Manufacturing# ........... ........... ........ Number of companies reporting 2/ 1,666 1 ,3a 1951 1/ Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Mean Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Median Lower quartile $8,800 #7,300 #5,200 $10,000 885 #7,700 #6,700 $4,800 #10,000 8,900 7,300 5,300 10,000 612 7,800 6,700 4,800 10,000 Mean^/ Food and kindred products................. Textile mill products and apparel........ Paper and allied products# .............. . Chemicals and allied products#............ Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals......................... . Drugs and medicines#................... Soap, cleaners, etc# .................. Paint, varnish, etc..................... Other chemical products#...... ......... 61 45 47 238 8,700 8,500 7,100 7,900 8,700 7,100 7,000 7,000 6,400 5,000 6,000 5,000 10,000 9,500 8,500 8,500 13 10 9 155 5,800 7,100 5,600 6,900 6,300 5,000 6,000 6,100 4,000 4,600 3,600 5,000 10,000 8,300 6,700 8,000 77 64 15 28 54 7,800 9,200 8,600 4,000 7,600 7,000 7,100 8,000 5,700 6,600 5,000 5,000 5,800 4,000 5,000 8,300 9,200 9,500 7,000 8,300 50 39 9 21 36 7,700 6,700 7,800 5,300 6,900 6,800 6,000 7,100 5,800 5,500 5,000 4,000 5,600 3,600 4,800 9,800 7,700 10,000 7,100 7,400 Petroleum refining........................ Rubber products........................... Stone, clay, and glass products......... . Primary metal industries................. Fabricated metal products#............... Machinery (except electrical)............ Electrical machinery##.................... Transportation equipment# # ........ ........ Motor vehicles and equipment#.......... Aircraft and parts#..................... Other transportation equipment......... 43 30 33 39 127 160 209 96 23 58 15 8,100 7,200 6,600 10,100 7,900 8,000 9,400 10,000 10,900 9,700 15,500 7,600 7,200 6,600 8,200 7,000 7,300 7,700 8,700 8,800 8,500 9,300 6,000 5,000 4,500 6,200 5,300 5,000 5,100 6,100 7,000 5,500 6,000 9,400 9,400 8,900 11,100 9,900 10,400 10,300 12,400 11,300 13,700 11,700 18 13 12 6 54 58 109 24 3 18 3 7,400 8,700 7,700 9,900 7,600 8,300 8,400 7,800 8,000 7,800 7,800 6,500 7,100 5.300 (1/) 6,300 6,300 7,900 7,300 Q/) 7,000 (1/0 5,000 3,600 4,400 (1/) 5,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 (1/) 4,000 (1/) 8,300 10,600 Professional and scientific instruments..# Photographic equipment and supplies.... Other professional and scientific instruments# ......................... 136 20 7,500 7,500 6,800 7,700 4,900 5,700 9,000 10,100 96 14 7,600 10,400 6,700 8,500 4,500 6,300 9,400 10,900 116 7,400 6,800 4,800 9,000 82 7,100 6,300 4,400 8,800 Other manufacturing..... ................. 77 8,700 7,600 5,300 10,100 35 8,300 7,000 4,600 10,000 Nonmanufacturing............................ 325 8,100 7,100 5,000 9,900 273 7,700 7,100 4,800 9,700 214 35 76 7,500 6,600 9,300 7,000 6,300 7,500 4,500 5,000 5,500 9,500 8,000 11,000 202 31 40 7,600 7,100 10,000 7,100 6,300 7,400 4,500 4,800 5,500 9,700 8,000 12,200 Commercial consulting f i r m s . • Nonprofit research agencies. •............. Other nonmanufacturing. ............... . See footnotes a t end o f table# 10,400 (1/) 8,300 10,000 10,800 10,000 (1/) 10,000 (1/) C-?6. Average cost per research worker, by industry and size of company, 1951 1 / __Continued Companies with 500 to 4,999 employees Industry Number of companies reporting Mean */ Companies with Median Lower quartile Upper quartile Number of companies reporting Meani/ All industries. 533 $8,000 *7,500 *5,800 $10,100 197 *9,200 Manufacturing. 506 8,100 7,500 5,800 10,100 186 9,200 31 24 29 58 8,700 11,200 6,500 8,200 8,900 8,300 7,000 6,900 7,200 5,600 6,000 6,000 10,000 11,000 8,700 9,600 16 10 9 21 8,800 7,200 8,000 7,900 17 18 3 4 16 7,100 9,800 6,900 6,300 7,600 6,600 9.100 6,000 6,100 1,2/) (2/) 9 6 3 3 8,000 9,100 8,900 3,000 6,600 (2/) (2/) 5,500 7,900 10,200 (2 /) 8 10 13 17 54 76 85 40 10 22 8 6,900 8,400 7,100 5,600 7,500 8,800 7,600 9,500 7,500 9,400 18,200 7,900 8,000 6,900 7,000 7,600 7,200 7,500 8,700 7,900 9,600 9,500 6,500 4,900 3,700 5,200 5,300 5,400 5,700 6,700 6,100 7,000 5,000 9,700 9,400 8,900 8,400 9,900 10,000 10,000 15,800 10,400 15,900 16,300 8,600 Food and kindred products......... Textile mill products and apparel*. Paper and allied products*........ Chemicals and allied products..... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals.................... Drugs and medicines............. Soap, cleaners, etc. *.......... Paint, varnish, etc............. Other chemical products......... Petroleum refining.............. Rubber products................. Stone, clay, and glass products.. Primary metal industries........ Fabricated metal products....... Machinery (except electrical),... Electrical machinery............ Transportation equipment........ Motor vehicles and equipment... Aircraft end parts............. Other transportation equipment. . • . . . . a * Professional and scientific instruments. « Photographic equipment and supplies... . Other professional and scientific instruments*................. . a 31 5 6,900 6,900 5.700 6,300 (2/) (2/) 26 7,100 7,100 Other manufacturing. 30. 9,000 27 7,500 Nonmanufacturing..... Commercial consulting firms Nonprofit research agencies. Other nonmanufacturing..... a a 2 4 21 a/) 6,400 11,000 (2/) 9,600 16 4 7 13 13 23 11 30 9 ' 17 4 8,100 7,100 6,500 11,500 8,600 7,400 10,000 10,000 11,200 9,300 14,200 Median $8,200 8,200 9,000 7,300 8,400 8,200 8,100 (2/0 (2/0 (2/) 8,600 (2/0 (2/) 8,400 7.700 8,400 8.700 8,900 8,800 8.800 h/) 6 1 7,600 h/) 5,000 3,900 5 7,700 8,300 6,600 11,000 7 8,200 7,500 5,900 10,000 11 8,700 (2/) (2/) 8,500 (2/) (2/) __ — 11 a.* -8,700 8,500 (2/) (2/) 7,500 (2/) (2/) 5,300 11,000 (2/) Lower quartile Upper quartile $10,000 6,900 10,100 7,100 9,900 4,800 8,200 7,300 6,400 8,600 8,700 7,500 8,200 (2/) (2/) (2/0 (2/0 (2/) (2/) $6,700 (2/) (1/) 7.200 5,600 6,500 5,800 (2/) (2/) 12,900 10,300 10,500 9,600 11,900 11,300 12,200 h/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 8,900 5,800 8,900 7.200 6,700 7,000 5.900 6.900 Q/) Q/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 9,400 1/ Cost figures rounded to the nt____ +, j Excludes companies that failed to report total research cost or number of research employees. The number of reporting companies in the three size groups do not add to the total shown in column 1, which include companies not reporting their total employment. Means are not shown for fewer than three companies; medians and quartiles are not shown for fewer than eight companies, T W 00mpute* ^ d i v i d i n g the aggregate cost of research by the average number of research employees for each specified group of companies. They thus reflect to a greet extent the experience of the largest organizations in the group. This should be borne in mind in comparing the means *ith median ratios, which were computed from rankings of ratios for individual companies. p g lth C-27. Average cost per research worker, by industry and size o f professional research s ta ff, 1951 Industry All reporting companies 1/ Companies with professional research staff of-— 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more All industries ............................ $8,800 $7,900 $8,200 $7,900 $8,200 $8,000 $8,200 $8,300 $9,300 $8,600 $9,400 Manufacturing ............................. 8,900 8,000 8,200 7,800 8,400 7,900 7,900 8,400 9,400 8,900 9,500 Food and kindred products .......... . Textile mill products and apparel ...... Paper and alliea products •••«.......... Chemicals and allied products .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ................... *...... Drugs and medicines .................. . Soap, cleaners, etc.................... Paint, varnish, etc.................... Other chemical products .......... . 8,700 8,500 7,100 7,900 8,500 9,000 6,100 7,100 9,100 11,100 7,500 7,300 8,400 7,200 6,000 7,400 12,100 (2/) 6,300 7,300 (2/) (2/) (S/) 7,700 (2/) (2/) 7,400 7,000 (2/) — 9,800 _ — — 7,200 7,800 9,200 7,200 7,300 10,900 5,900 6,200 8,400 6,500 7,300 6,100 7,900 6,400 7,700 (2/) 6,100 9,500 7,300 7,900 (2/) (2/) 7,500 7,300 11,700 6,900 (2/) (2/) 8,400 (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) — — — — (i/) <2/0 (2/) (2/) 10,700 (2/) — — Petroleum refining ••••................. Rubber products ......................... Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal i n dustries.... ........... Fabricated metal products .......... . Machinery (excerrt electrical) ......... Electrical machinery ............. ...... Transportation equipment ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts .................... Other transportation equipment ..... 8,100 7,200 7,300 9,200 7,400 6,100 9,600 10,000 7,500 5,700 5,200 5,700 8,400 (2/) — 7,100 9,400 9,000 10,100 7,900 (2/) (2/) 8,900 7,300 7,100 10,000 (2/) 13,400 — 8,700 (2/) 6,500 (2/) (2/) 8,500 7,000 8,000 (2/) 7,900 — (2/) (2/) — — — — 6,200 14,000 — 6,600 (2/) 7,400 5,500 10,700 7,700 7,000 8,500 10,900 8,300 12,500 24,900 8,100 — — 10,100 7,900 8,000 9,400 10,000 10,900 9,700 15,500 7,200 6,300 9,800 8,500 6,300 6,600 9,300 11,000 18,500 9,000 10,300 __ — — — — (2/) 11,000 8,800 — 8,800 — Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments ........................ 7,500 7,500 6,900 9,600 7,700 9,200 5,900 (2/) 6,500 — 8,100 (2/) 9,600 (2/) (2/) (2/) «/) _ — (2/) <s/> 7,400 6,600 7,200 5,900 6,500 7,700 11,100 (2/) (2/) — (2/) Other manufacturing ..................... 8,700 8,100 9,300 8,100 12,400 — 9,000 7,700 — Nonmanu fac turing .......................... 8,100 7,500 8,000 8,300 7,100 9,400 9,700 7,700 8,700 (2/) (2/) Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ............. Other nonmanufacturing ................. 7,500 7,500 6,900 7,800 8,300 6,000 8,000 7,100 7,000 12,900 6,700 5,800 8,800 10,600 (2/) 7,200 (2/) (£/) (2/) 7,400 (2/) __ 6,600 (2/) __ — 1/ 2/ 8,600 4,000 7,600 6,600 9,300 Cost figures rounded to the nearest $100. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 6,600 (i/) , (2/) — (2/) 6,800 %] dJ) 9,300 — — (2/) (2/) 8,300 6,800 7,300 (2/) (2/) (2/) 9,900 (2/) (2/) 7,300 12,000 (2/) 12,300 -- _ — — (2/) 14,000 — — _ — — (2/) — — — — dJ) C-28. Annual separation rate of research engineers and scientists, by industry, July 1950 to June 1951 and July to December 1951 Number of separations per 100 research engineers and scientists Industry July 1950 to June 1951 Selective Service calls July to December 1951 2/ Reserve calls Selective Service calls Other se parations 16.4 1.8 1.2 13.4 10.9 16.2 1.8 1.2 13.2 .8 .3 .9 .9 8.0 7.6 6.5 6.7 15.0 13.8 14.4 13.8 1.0 1.8 4.0 1.0 1.0 .8 .8 .8 13.0 11.2 9.6 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.7 2.4 2.2 .8 .6 1.2 2.7 1.1 6.2 8.3 4.7 10.7 8.1 13.8 11.6 17.6 20.6 14.8 .8 1.2 1.8 .4 .6 .6 .6 1.4 3.2 .6 12.4 9.8 14.4 17.0 13.6 8.5 9.6 5.9 11.0 13.4 12.9 15.2 19.3 13.6 19.9 H.7 1.7 1.7 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.9 3.1 1.9 2.4 1.8 2.5 .2 .6 .4 .5 .8 1.8 1.3 .6 .3 .6 .7 6.6 7.3 4.3 9.2 10.8 9.2 10.8 16.8 10.9 17.5 11.5 8.8 11.8 10.8 11.4 15.8 17.6 15.8 20.6 18.0 20.8 16.4 1.2 1.4 .6 1.4 1.4 1.8 3.2 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.8 16.7 22.0 1.0 1.4 .8 1.6 14*9 19.0 18.6 24.6 15.7 .9 .7 14.1 Other manufacturing.............. ........... M.l 1.6 .7 11.8 Nonmanufacturing ............................... 15.5 1.3 .6 13.6 Commercial consulting firms ................. Nonprofit research agencies ................. Other nonmanufacturing............ .......... 16.3 25.9 8.5 1.3 1.3 1.2 14.0 24.1 6.9 19.8 Total Reserve calls All industries ................................. 13.9 1.8 0.8 11.3 Manufacturing .................................. 13.6 1.8 .9 Food and kindred products .................... Textile mill products and apparel ........... Paper and allied products .............. . Chemicals and allied products ............. .. Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ............................... Drugs and medicines ............ ........... Soap, cleaners, etc...... .................. Paint, varnish, etc........................ Other chemical products ................... 10.2 8.9 10.7 8.8 1.4 1.0 3.3 1.2 8.0 9.9 7.6 15.8 11.4 Petroleum refining .......................... Rubber products ............................. Stone, clay, and glass products ............. Primary metal industries .................... Fabricated metal products .................... Machinery (except electrical) ............... Electrical machinery ........... .............. Transportation equipment ................... .. Motor vehicles and equipment .............. Aircraft and p a r t s ...... .................. Other transportation equipment ............ Professional and scientific instruments ..... Photographic equipment and supplies ....... Other professional and scientific instruments ............................ 1 / Rates for the six-month period were converted to annual ra tes. 2/ Less than 0.05 percent. 1.0 .5 .4 Other se parations \ Total (g/).6 1.4 .8 1.2 5.4 1.4 .6 2.0 .6 4.0 7.6 9.8 8.8 9.2 13.2 10.4 11.2 17.8 14.0 18.0 9.6 1.2 .6 .6 .8 16.8 23.2 17.2 1.4 .6 . ,15.2 14.2 1.2 •4 12.6 16.8 1.2 .8 14.8 1.6 .8 1.2 .4 .8 17.0 23.6 7.2 24.8 9.0 1.0 C-29* A n n u a l separ a t i o n rate of r e s e a r c h e n g i n e e r s a n d scientists, b y i n d u s t r y a n d size o f company, J u l y to D e c e m b e r 1951 1/ (Number of separations per 100 research engineers and scientists) All reporting companies Industry Companies with total employment of — Fewer than 500 500 to 999 5,000 or more A, All industries 16.4 19.2 19.0 1 5 .0 Manufacturing....... ................... 16.2 18.2 17.8 1 5 .8 Food and kindred products ........... . Textile mill products and apparel .... Paper and allied products *».......... Chemicals and allied products ........ Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ....................... Drugs and medicines •*....*.»«»..... Soap, cleaners, etc................. Paint, varnish, etc................. Other chemical products ...... ...... 15.0 13.8 14*4 13.8 24»4 12.2 5.2 I4 .8 14.2 16.0 13.8 14.8 14.8 1 3 .2 1 5 .8 1 3 .4 13.8 11.6 17.6 20.6 9.4 10*4 16.0 29.2 17.8 18.4 12.0 10.4 21.4 13.4 1 3 .4 1 1 .2 19 .0 Petroleum r efining.... .............. Rubber products ...................... Stone, clay, and glass products Primary metal industries ....... ..... Fabricated metal products •......... •.. Machinery (except electrical) ..... . Electrical machinery •«•••»••••«••••••• Transportation equipment ............. Motor vehicles and equipment ....... Aircraft and parts ......... ....... Other transportation equipment ...... 8.8 11.8 10.8 11.4 15.8 17.6 15.8 20.6 18.0 20.8 16.4 1 0 .0 8.8 12.6 18.0 7.4 21.2 10.4 22.8 8.0 (2/) 17.4 23.6 35.6 9-2 12.2 1 0 .0 10.2 14.8 23.0 13.2 20.4 17.6 20.6 8.8 18.6 27.0 24.6 24.6 19.6 24.6 12.4 — 17.2 27.8 17.2 12.4 14.2 12.2 13.8 15.6 16.8 20.0 25.0 4.8 19.8 I9 .2 23-0 16.2 25.8 23 *6 Professional and scientific instruments ................. Photographic equipment and supplies . Other professional and scientific instruments .............. . Other manufacturing .............. .... Nonmanufacturing ................... Commercial consulting firms .......... Nonprofit research agencies .......... Other nonmanufacturing ............... 1/ 2/ 14.8 24.8 9.0 8.0 36.0 9.6 19 .2 14.6 18.6 16.0 20.6 23.6 2 4 .0 Rates for the six-month period were converted to annual rates. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 92 (2/) — — 4.8 C -3 0 . A n n u a l s e p a r a tio n r a t e o f r e s e a r c h e n g in e e r s and s c i e n t i s t s , b y s iz e o f com p an y, J u ly 1 9 5 0 t o Jun e 1 9 5 1 and J u ly t o December 1951 Number of separations per 100 reseiarch engineers and scientists Total company employment July 1950 to June 1951 Total Reserve calls Selective Service calls July to December 1951 1/ Other sep arations Total Reserve calls Selective Service calls Other sep arations Total .................. 13.9 1.8 0.8 11.3 16.4 1.8 1.2 13.4 Less than 500 .......... 17.3 1.5 1.2 M.6 19.2 1.4 1.2 16.6 500 - 4,999 ............ 16.4 1.5 .8 14.1 19.0 1.6 8 16.6 5,000 or more ...... .. 12.6 1.9 .8 9.9 15.0 2.0 1.2 11.8 1/ Rates for the six-month period were converted to annual rates. C -3 1 . A n n u a l s e p a r a tio n r a te o f r e s e a r c h e n g in e e r s and s c i e n t i s t s , b y s iz e o f p r o fe s s io n a l r e se a r c h s t a f f , J u ly 1 9 5 0 t o Jun e 1 9 5 1 and J u ly to D ecem ber 1 9 5 1 Number of separations per 100 research engineers and scientists July to December 1951 1/ July 1950 to June 1951 CM (ye Ui nf r sr*UlCDpi-UilCLL r»'Toc;ci nrifll pi research staff Total Reserve calls Selective Service calls Other sepa rations Total Reserve calls Selective Service calls Other sepa rations Total..................... 13.9 1.8 0.8 11.3 16.4 1.8 1.2 13.4 o - / .... ........... 13.7 14.4 U.6 14.0 15.5 14.7 12.0 15.0 14.0 13.4 2.7 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.3 2.1 .9 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 .9 .4 .6 .4 1.0 10.1 11.1 11.8 10.9 12.9 12.2 10.4 12.6 12.3 10.3 18.8 19.0 19.2 17.0 17.8 15.4 16.0 19.6 14.2 15.0 1.2 1.8 2.0 1.2 2.6 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.0 2.0 2.4 1.2 2.0 1.2 1.4 .8 .2 .8 .2 1.6 15.2 16.0 15.2 14.6 13.8 13.0 14.6 17.0 13.0 11.4 1 5 30 50 75 125 250 500 - 2 9 ............... 49 ............... 1 L ............... 12L .............. 2Z.9.............. Z.99.............. 999 .............. 1^000 or more T f . t ....... . 1/ Rates for the sixrmonth period were converted to annual rates. C-32* Research engineers and sc ie n tis ts lia b le for m ilitary auty per 100 employed, by industry and size o f company, January 1952 All reporting companies Companies with total employment of Less than 500 5,000 or more 500 - 4,999 Industry Classified 1A or 2A vo VJl Members of Reserves or National Guard Classified 1A or 2A Members of Reserves or National Guard Classified 1A or 2A Members of Reserves or National Guard Classified 1A or 2A Members of Reserves or National Guard All industries ........................... 6.3 18.9 4.1 10.5 3.9 14.8 7.5 21.8 Manufacturing ...... ...................... 6.7 19.5 4.0 9.8 3.6 14.1 7.9 22.2 Food and kindred products .............. Textile mill products and a p p a r e l .... .. Paper and allied products ............ .. Chemicals and allied products .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .......................... Drugs and medicines .................. Soap, cleaners, etc...... ............. Paint, varnish, etc......... ......... Other chemical products ....... ....... 2./+ 2.5 2.8 4.9 12.5 13.6 17.9 17.1 0 2.9 0 4.6 7.1 5.9 7.5 10.1 0 1.3 1.8 3.4 12.9 17.1 14.4 13.8 3.5 3.0 4.1 5.8 12.2 12.3 23.3 19.4 6.3 3.3 2.9 6.4 3.4 19.3 11.3 22.2 12.9 16.2 6.6 2.8 2.2 3.9 5.2 11.7 8.9 5*6 7.8 12.9 4 .6 1.4 8.7 10.1 2.4 14.7 11.1 13.0 22.6 16.6 6.8 5.0 2.1 20.8 11.6 26.1 (1/) Petroleum refining ...................... Rubber products ........................ Stone, clay, and glass products ......... Primary metal industries ......... ...... Fabricated metal products ............... Machinery (except electrical) .......... Electrical m a c h i n e r y ........... ....... Transportation e q u i p m e n t .... ........... Motor vehicles and equipment ......... Aircraft and parts ................... Other transportation equipment ....... 3.4 4.9 2.5 2.2 2.7 7.4 11.6 6.2 3.9 6.3 11.1 24.8 12.4 12.5 12.2 11.9 13.2 23.0 22.8 19.9 23.0 19.2 1.9 3.6 6.2 10.6 3.0 2.4 4.2 3.9 2.9 4.4 15.2 5.8 15.9 11.1 10.3 12.7 8.4 12.8 0 16.1 (1/) 39.7 23.4 17.4 6.6 12.3 13.7 11.6 15.9 13.4 16.3 7.1 3 .7 5.2 2 .3 1 .7 1.8 9 .9 14.1 6 .5 4 .5 (1/) 4.4 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.7 4.3 3.9 4.0 2.2 3.9 12.5 6.6 11.1 24.4 12.2 12.1 13.0 13.1 13.0 28.2 23.7 21.2 23.9 24.5 Professional and scientific instruments.. Photographic equipment and supplies ... Other professional and scientific instruments ....................... 7.2 1.5 17.3 6.8 4.5 1.5 9.9 7.9 2.6 1.5 11.2 3.7 13.1 — 25.9 _ 8.5 18.7 5.7 10.7 3.2 13.4 13.1 25.9 Other manufacturing......... ........... 4*4 13.6 2.9 7.6 4.2 13.9 5.8 15.9 Nonmanufacturing...... ................... 3.7 14.4 4.3 11.4 5.4 18.4 1.1 14.2 4.9 3.1 3.0 10.2 13.6 12.7 19.4 14.7 27.5 _ _ 1.1 __ _ 14.2 Commercial consulting firms ............ Nonprofit research agencies ............ Other nonmanufacturing..... ......... 1/ 4*4 5.3 2.1 Data are not shov.ni for fewer than 3 companies. 11.3 14*3 16.6 .3 6.4 5.3 a/) C-33. Research engineers and scientists liable for military duty per 100 employed, by size of pro fessional research staff, January 1952 Members of Reserves or National Guard Size of professional research staff Classified 1A or 2A Total .................. 6.3 18.9 3.7 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.4 4.4 4*4 5.0 12.4 12.0 11.6 13.1 10.7 15.2 16.4 23.6 14.9 24.7 0 4 5 - H 15 - 29 30 - 49 50 - 74 75-124 125-249 250 - 499 500 - 999 1,000 or more ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ ....... ....... 6 .4 9.8 96 APPEN DIX D STATISTICAL DATA CLASSIFIED BY M A JO R RESEARCH SPECIALTY 97 STATISTICAL DATA CLASSIFIED BY M A JO R RESEARCH SPECIALTY In filling out the questionnaire, companies vere asked to check the specialty in which they were most competent to perform re search and development. Their choice was limited to a list of l6 fields oriented toward the research interests of the Department of Defense. 31/ In the tabulations, these 16 research categories have "been consolidated into eight major research specialties as follows: (a) Aeronautics Aircraft, piloted Guided missiles (e) Fuels and lubricants Fuels and lubricants Geophysics and geography 00 Basic and medical sciences Basic natural sciences Medical sciences (f) Materials (g) Ordnance Electronics 00 Other major specialties Aircraft armament Atomic energy Biological warfare Chemical warfare navigation (c) (a) Equipment and supplies Aircraft equipment Equipment and supplies The classification of companies by major research specialty has some of the same limitations as the industry classification. Even if a company were competent to perform research in several major specialties, it was forced to select one of these as the field in which it was most competent to do research. To illustrate, some com panies in the electrical machinery industry checked electronics as their primary specialty even though a part of their research activity was in aeronautics or materials. In the statistics, the entire research staff and research cost of each company were, of necessity, classified under the spec ialty in which the company was most competent. Consequently, the figures presented in the following tables give‘only a rough indica tion of the distribution of scientific effort among different specialties. The interrelationships between the specialty classification and the industry classification used elsewhere in the report are indi cated in tables D-l and D-2. Companies in the electrical machinery industry did most of the research work here classified under elec tronics. Aircraft manufacturers did most of that classified under aeronautics. In basic and medical sciences and materials, most of the work was done by companies in chemicals industries; in ordnance, 3i/ See questionnaire, reproduced in Appendix B. 98 most of it was done by motor vehicle manufacturers; in fuels and lubricants, by petroleum refining companies. Die research classified under materials, equipment and supplies, and "other major specialties" was conducted in a variety of industries. These relationships explain the many sim ilarities between the data given in the following tables and the statistics for different industries presented in the body of the report and in Appendix C. Each company was asked to indicate on the questionnaire not only its primary research specialty but also a ll the specialties, out of a long and detailed lis t, in which it was qualified to undertake research. The numbers of companies which checked each specialty are given in table D-9. It should be noted that the figures in this table are not additive, since most companies checked more than one specialty; many checked 15 or more specialties. 99 D -l. Number of reporting companies, by industry and major research sp e c ia lty Major research specialty of company All reporting com panies All industries .......................... Manufacturing ...................... . Industry Aero nautics Basic and medical sciences Elec tronics 1,953 79 324 277 647 1,538 58 222 217 Equip ment and supplies Fuels and lubri cants Ord nance 112 321 119 74 547 70 263 102 59 Food and kindred products ............ . Textile mill products and apparel ..... Paper and allied products .............. Chemicals and allied products .......... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals ........................ Drugs and medicines ............. . Soap, cleaners, etc................ . Paint, varnish, etc. ................. Other chemical products ............ .. 73 49 49 276 — — — — 7 2 1 155 _ — — 2 62 39 24 16 — 1 1 7 3 6 21 80 _ 85 77 19 32 63 — — 36 74 12 10 23 — — — 1 1 3 1 4 — 1 — 32 1 2 — — — 3 2 Petroleum refining .................... . Rubber products ....................... Stone, clay, and glass products ........ Primary metal industries ............... Fabricated metal products ............. Machinery (except electrical) ......... Electrical machinery ................... Transportation equipment ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ........ Aircraft and parts ................... Other transportation equipment ...... 49 — — 2 7 10 44 1 76 124 67 40 5 27 8 2 — — — 33 — 2 3 38 50 150 — 1 4 2 7 3 3 1 4 3 105 26 63 16 6 34 1 31 2 — 1 — 144 2 — 2 — 1H 236 — 2 9 1 7 Other spe cial ties Mate rials 2 7 7 3 13 31 1 1 2 1 — 1 14 8 1 1 1 — 3 _ 1 — 1 — — 1 1 20 20 35 26 14 5 4 2 1 1 26 18 6 20 17 — 3 _ 1 1 1 6 5 5 3 1 1 1 — — 5 — 3 Professional and scientific instruments. Photographic equipment and supplies... Other professional and scientific instruments ............. .......... 153 24 7 — 22 1 47 5 39 16 8 1 4 — 11 1 15 — 129 7 21 42. 23 7 4 10 15 Other manufacturing .................... 93 1 7 8 34 — 24 13 6 Nonraanufacturing ........................ 415 21 102 60 100 42 58 17 15 Commercial consulting firms ........... Nonprofit research agencies ........... Other nonmanufacturing ................ 286 39 90 14 3 74 17 46 18 3 12 11 11 35 5 18 13 4 74 5 21 1 2 100 3 2 22 1 D-2. Cost of research, by industry and major research specialty, 1951 (thousands of dollars) 275235 0 - 53 - 8 Major research specialty of company All reporting companies Aeronautics All industries ............ ...... ............. l/H.804,529 $370,955 Manufacturing .................................. 1,624,687 359,405 Industry 23,889 15,817 11,116 204,230 _ — — — 131,340 44,043 12,342 6,436 10,019 — — — — Petroleum r e f i n i n g .... ...................... Rubber products .............................. Stone, clay, and glass products .............. Primary metal industries .................... Fabricated metal products .................... Machinery (except electrical) ............... Electrical machinery ........................ Transportation e q u i p m e n t ..... ............... Motor vehicles and equipment ....... ....... Aircraft and parts ........................ Other transportation equipment ............ 92,942 22,890 20,752 34,596 33,404 99,729 432,343 511,324 94,303 410,804 6,217 _ — 893 (2/0 6,261 347,662 (2/) 345,153 (2/) Professional and scientific instruments ..... Photographic equipment and supplies ....... Other professional and scientific instruments ............................ 91,313 30,794 61,019 Other manufacturing ......................... Nonmanufacturing .............................. Food and kindred products ................... Textile mill products and apparel •........... Paper and allied products .................. . Chemicals and allied products ............... Industrial organic and inorganic chemicals .............................. Drugs and medicines ............. .......... Soap, cleaners, etc........................ Paint, varnish, etc........................ Other chemical products .................... Commercial consulting firms ................. Nonprofit research agencies .................. Other nonmanufacturing ...................... Basic and medical sciences Elec tronics Equip ment and supplies Fuels and lu bricants Materials $146,706 $ 531,668 $291,906 $106,103 $187,698 $142,170 $27,323 129,033 435,086 281,018 96,186 168,915 129,531 25,508 1,586 (2/0 (2/) 110,399 __ — — (2/) 22,126 11,706 4,202 10,084 _ (2/) (2/) 1,417 51,883 43,403 11,020 1,322 2,771 — — — (2/) (2/) 3,884 (2/) (2/) 450 2,686 (I/O — i /) — (2/) 996 4,465 1,440 25,930 61,903 19,371 51,996 3,722 45,044 3,230 91,819 (2/) 48 2,179 956 (2/) __ — (2/) (2/) 597 2,945 397,381 (2/) 3,717 — 7,616 <2/) 1,006 3,717 (2/) 24,842 (2/) 476 179,842 11,550 44,193 37,577 98,072 3,648 5,328 2,574 — (2/) W ) 3,502 1,805 1,005 — (2/) (I/) Ordnance Other spe cialties (2/) 2,976 4,927 77,545 __ (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) 3,076 71,150 (2/) (2/) 1,494 4,841 C2/) (2/) _ _ B o (2/) 482 — (2/) _ (2/) (2/) 19,728 12,787 30,646 3,217 11,839 240 2,242 (2/) (2/) (2/) 1,290 6,216 15,887 2,658 87,717 87,329 _ 388 61,495 29,552 400 (2/) 282 __ 3,845 (2/) 7,058 6,394 31,943 (2/) 282 (2/) 7,058 5,662 4,696 2,286 7,196 (2/) 17,668 96,582 10,888 9,917 18,783 12,639 1,815 8,408 8,584 676 12,456 5,492 78,634 7,345 960 2,583 2,526 (2/) (2/) 2,801 9,765 6,217 5,959 (2/) (2/) 1,050 (2/) (2/0 642 7,400 — (2/) 2,118 — (2/) — — (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/) (2/0 & 0 5,476 938 C2/) (2/) (2/) l/ This table is based on reports for 1,772 companies. In addition, the study includes 181 companies that failed to supply information on the cost of research in 1951. 2/ Data withheld to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies, but these data are included in totals. D-3. Distribution of research employment and research cost, by major research specialty 1/ Percent distribution Number of companies Major research specialty of company Employment, January 1952 All researoh workers Engineers and scientists Supporting personnel Cost of research, 1951 102 Aeronautics .............................. Basic and medical sciences .......... . Electronics .............................. Equipment and s u p p l i e s ............ Fuel and lubricants ................. . M a t e r i a l s ....... ........ ............... Ordnance .............................. . Other research specialties .............. 79 324 277 647 112 321 119 74 18.7 8.6 27.1 16.8 6.0 10.8 10.3 1.7 19.3 11.6 22.8 18.9 6.3 12.3 6.9 1.9 18.3 6.6 30.0 15.3 5.9 9.8 12.6 1.5 18.8 7.7 27.0 15.2 5.7 10.4 13.8 1.4 Total .................................... -• 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Total number reported 2/ ................ 1,953 95,694 142,572 238,266 $1,980 i (millions) ■ 1/ The figures in this table are estimates covering all 1,953 companies in the survey. They include c o m m n i e s that failed to report one or more of the items shown in the table. 2j Although the manpower estimates are given in exact numbers, not all digits of the numbers are statistically significant. D-A. Number of research engineers and s c ie n tis ts , by major research sp ecia lty and size o f professional research s ta f f, January 1952 Companies with professional research staff of — All reporting companies Major research specialty of company All specialties ......................... 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 or more 1/ 91,585 1,00 4,590 5,053 5,334 4,629 5,386 10,787 11,223 9,689 33,454 18,475 10,833 21,781 17,567 5,928 10,502 4,665 1,834 23 309 166 527 102 146 665 726 1,604 203 747 290 209 173 550 1,015 1,760 257 713 444 141 352 585 842 1,627 183 890 445 410 189 466 636 659 1,344 604 926 396 355 1,282 2,394 1,400 2,013 1,122 1,022 1,036 518 1,883 2,354 1,564 2,632 (2/) 2,094 11,329 (2/) 12,718 6,221 Aeronautics..... .............. .......... Basic and medical sciences ....... ....... Electronics ••........... ................. Equipment and supplies ................... Fuels and lubricants .................. .• Materials ......................... ..... . Ordnance ................................. Other research specialties .............. % \ 880 597 1,463 (2 /) 854 355 (2/) 1,008 2,178 1,203 1,033 (I/) 2,002 (2/) (2/) 1J This table is based on reports from 1,815 companies. In addition, the study included 138 companies that failed to supply information on the number of research engineers and scientists employed in January 1952. 2j Data withheld to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies, but these data are included in totals. D-5. Average number of supporting personnel per research engineer or scientist, by major research specialty and size of professional research staff, January 1952 Companies with professional research staff of — Major research specialty of company All reporting 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 companies All specialties .................. 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 Aeronautics ....................... Basic and medical sciences ........ Electronics ............ ........ Equipment and supplies .......... Fuels and lubricants.... ......... Materials ........... .............. Ordnance ......................... . Other research specialties ••...•.• 1.4 .8 2.0 1.2 1.4 1.2 2.6 1.1 2.5 .6 1.2 1.1 .8 .9 1.7 1.1 2.6 .8 1.3 1.2 1.0 .9 1.7 2.0 .9 1.2 1.1 1.4 .7 2.9 •4 .8 1.5 1.1 1.6 (l/) 2.5 — 1.2 G/) 2.2 1.4 — _ _ 1 .0 2.7 .8 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.4 1 .0 1.2 .9 1.1 1.3 1.4 .9 1.4 1.6 l/ Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. G/) 1 .4 2 .1 .8 .7 .7 1.1 .8 .5 .9 .9 .4 1 .0 1.2 .6 1.3 1.5 5.7 Q/) 1 .1 (i/) or more D-6. Cost o f Government-financed research as percent of to ta l research c o st, by major research sp ecia lty and size of professional research 6 ta ff, 1951 Major research specialty of company All reporting companies All specialties .................... 46.3 Aeronautics ........................ Basic and medical sciences ........ Electronics ........................ Equipment and supplies ............ Fuels and lubricants .•............ Materials ..... .................... Ordnance ........................... Other research specialties ........ 87.0 6.2 58.5 36.0 5.2 13.9 23.5 49.0 1/ Companies with professional research staff of— 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 125 to 249 250 to 499 500 to 999 34.4 35.6 40.5 37.0 32.3 33.4 41.1 36.0 55.4 55.3 38.4 11.1 53.4 39-2 21.6 14.9 61.6 32.2 61.9 16.7 63.7 31.8 27.2 15.6 43.1 44.8 77 *4 9.1 71.3 31.7 15.5 27.7 36.6 26.7 52.2 12.3 75.4 27.3 13.3 17.4 41.3 41.0 96.2 5*4 59.9 47.9 (1/) 7.8 12.1 19.3 81.3 1.4 66.3 29.5 11.0 8.7 60.7 33.9 97.7 8.7 95.8 24.4 2.2 2.1 44.9 80.4 98.8 1.3 74.7 18.0 5.2 35.0 7.9 88*4 (i/) 70.8 83.3 0/) 52.3 45.1 Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. d7) 22.1 (1/) 1,000 or more (I/) D_7. Average cost per research engineer or s c ie n tis t, by major research sp ecialty and size of professional research s ta f f, 1951 1 / Companies with professional research staff of— Major research specialty of company All specialties ............ Aeronautics ................. Basic and medical sciences ... Electronics ................. Equipment and supplies ...... Fuels and lubricants ......... Materials .................... Ordnance ..................... Other research specialties ... 1/ 2/ All reporting companies $21*200 .. 24-,100 14-, 500 27,500 17.900 20,300 18,600 33.900 16,300 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 74 75 to 124 250 to 499 125 to 249 $15,500 $17,700 117,800 $17,800 $17,100 #14,500 $21,000 $24,900 32,900 11,000 16,700 18,100 17.600 13,300 19,000 19,800 16.600 14.,800 22,900 15,400 34,300 12,900 20,200 16,100 20,700 13.900 27,400 13.900 17.600 13,800 19.600 J9,100 17.600 15,400 17.600 19,800 18,400 13,200 17,800 18,200 (2/) 16,400 22,900 14,600 11,900 13.500 18,200 14.300 14.300 15,300 11.500 14,700 30,800 17,300 20,500 18.700 20,200 26,900 21.700 15.700 29,700 13,800 18,800 9,700 f 20,000 20,100 79,900 14,000 11,800 16,600 19,500 1,000 or more 500 to 999 $22,500 $25,000 37,200j (2/) 21,400; 20,200 (2/) 32,800 19,300 (2/) 14,100 G/> (2/7 Cost figures rounded to nearest $100. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. D-8. Average cost per research worker, by major research specialty ana size of professional research staff, 1951 1/ Companies with professional research staff of— All specialties .............. l7 2/ 0 to 4 5 to 14 15 to 29 30 to 50 to 75 to 125 to 250 to 500 to 49 74 124 249 499 999 $8,300 $ 9,300 $8,600 $9,400 8,100 11,500 7,000 8,700 5,700 8,100 8,300 11,700 8,900 (2/) 10,300 8,000 $8,800 $7,900 $8,200 $7,900 $8,200 $8,000 $8,200 9,900 7,900 9,400 8,100 8,200 7,800 9,200 7,600 9,300 7,200 8,500 8,500 7,600 6,400 6,500 8,800 5,000 7,300 8,100 9,200 8,900 7,200 11,000 6,800 8,800 7,700 9,000 7,900 6,700 6,900 8,200 7,000 9,500 8,300 7,500 8,100 7,000 8,700 13,300 7,700 7,200 9,100 8,200 8,200 8,700 8,000 9,300 8,100 6,100 9,900 Cost figures rounded to nearest $100. Data are not shown for fewer than three companies. 8,600 8,100 (2/) 7,200 7,100 8,100 • 9,600 7,800 7,500 8,700 9,200 8,000 6,200 1,000 or more 0 00 Aeronautics ................... Basic and medical sciences .— Electronics ................ .. Equipment and supplies ....... Fuels and lubricants ........ Materials ..................... Ordnance ...................... Other research specialties .... All reporting companies a Major research specialty of company (2/) 6,20C -- (2/) — 6,600 (2/) — — D -9.—Number of companies reporting that they were q u alified to do research in selected research sp ec ia ltie s i j Research sp ecialty Number of companies 2/ A ir c r a ft armament.................... ......................... Bombing system s and equipm ent..........., F ir e c o n tr o l s y s t e m s ............................., G u n s.............................................................. M unitions . . . . ............................................... T estin g and e v a lu a t io n ..........................., 289 124 169 54 44 A ir c r a ft e q u ip m e n t......................................... Automatic c o n tr o l s y s t e m s ..................., E le c t r ic a l s y s t e m s .................................... In stru m entation ........................................... M echanical s y s t e m s ................. , P arachutes ....................................................... T estin g and e v a lu a t io n .......................... 497 20 1 185 20 4 215 29 147 185 89 50 48 79 56 62 674 146 539 168 272 639 A ir c r a ft, p i l o t e d ........................................... Aerodynamics and str u c tu r e s . . . . . . C atapu lts and a r r e stin g g e a r .......... . Hydrodynamics ................................................ P r o p u ls io n ........................................................, T e stin g , a ir c r a f t f l i g h t .................... . T e stin g , p ro p u lsio n system s B asic n atu ral s c i e n c e s .............................. B io lo gy .............................................................. , C h e m istr y ......................................................... M a th em atics................. , P h y sics ..................... . . • • ............. E le c t r o n ic s .......................................................... , A co u stics .......................................................... Antennas and p r o p a g a tio n .................... . Communication ................................................ Components , E lectro n t u b e s .............................................. E le c tr o n ic counterm easures • •• •• •• < I n f r a r e d ........................................................... . In te r fe r en c e r e d u c t io n .......................... Radar and r e la te d f i e l d s ..................... T est equipment ............................................. Equipment and su p p lies ............................... C loth in g and p e r s o n a l............................. E le c t r ic a l .................................................. Food ................................ .................................... Heavy equipment and en g in eerin g c o n stru c tio n .......................................... . M aintenance equipment and u t i l i t i e s ................................................. . Marine c r a fts and a sso c ia te d hyd rodyn am ics....................................... . M e c h a n ic a l...................................................... . Photography and o p tic s ......................... P ack ing, packaging and p r e s e r v a tio n .........................................., Power u n its ..................................................., S h e l t e r ............................................................... S t o r a g e ............................................................... T o o ls, g en era l p u r p o se .......................... F u els and lu b r ic a n ts ......................... Petroleum ................................................. .. S y n th etic lu b r ic a n ts and h yd ra u lic f lu id s ......................................................... Liquid p ro p e lla n ts ............ Equipment fo r sto r a g e , p r o te c tio n , and d is tr ib u tio n ................................. G eophysics and geography ......................... Atmosphere ..................................................... Atm ospheric p h ysics C artography .................................................... Geodesy • • ..................................................... G eology ....................................................... Geomagnetism and e l e c t r i c i t y ............ Research sp ecialty Geophysics and geography—Continued H ydrology.......................................................... Ionosphere....................................................... .. M eteorological equipment ........................... Oceanography.................................................... Photogrammetric equipm ent........... .. Photo interpretation ............................ .. Seismology ...................................................... .. S o il mechanics • • • • . . . .......................... .. Weather forecasting ..................................... Guided m issiles • • • • ......................................... Aerodynamics and str u c tu r e s............. .. Countermeasures .............................................. Guidance and control ................................. Launching and handling .......................... .. Propulsion and fu els ............. ..................... Target drones .................................................. Test range procedures and instrumentation ........... Test and training equipment • • • • • • • • • . Warheads and fuzes ............................ .. Medical sciences ................................................ A n tib io tic s ...................................................... Atomic medicine .............................................. ............. .... Aviation medicine Bacteriology .................................................... D e n tistr y ........................ .................................. Disease .............................................................. Immunology ........................................................ Medical aspects of b iological and chemical warfare .......................... .. Medical equipment and prosthetic devices .................................................... Neuropsychiatry • • • • • .................................. Physiology and p ath ology......... ................ Sanitation ........................................................ Shock and transfusion ................................. Surgery ............................................................... Toxicology........................................................... M a ter ia ls.............................................................. Inorganic and mineral ................................. Metallurgy, e x tr a c tiv e ............................... Metallurgy, physical ........... ....................... Organic and fibrous ..................................... Physics of metals ......................................... P la s t ic s ...................................................... .. Navigation ............................ ................................ C elestia l ........................................................... Deed reckon in g............................................ .. E lectronic, common u s e r .......................... .. E lectronic, s e lf s u f f ic ie n t ..................* Gyro and in e r tia l ......................................... Pilotage and beacons ................................... Ordnance.......................... .. e. . . . . . . Degaussing nets and booms Explosives and prbpellants, molecular. Fire c o n tr o l................................... Fuzes, fir in g , and exploding mechanisms ...................... Guns and mounts, large caliber .............. Land mines and grenades ............................ P ro jectiles and ammunition d e t a ils .... Rockets and rocket launchers .................. Sea mines and depth charges .................... Small arms and automatic weapons . . . . . Torpedoes and tubes ..................................... V ehicles, combat ............................................ V ehicles, noncombat ..................................... Warheads and bombs ....................................... 88 136 160 275 302 73 140 102 96 258 328 1,034 94 214 160 178 162 92 64 102 62 356 107 238 165 248 96 100 76 97 207 19 22 15 6 62 26 Number of companies 2/ . 26 52 47 16 31 8 12 45 16 437 90 73 209 92 84 56 130 149 95 319 85 22 28 137 13 53 107 29 11 70 41 39 61 65 4 717 230 101 208 278 147 253 174 24 28 105 104 59 44 537 20 50 175 165 78 57 93 94 52 70 114 154 39 83 1 / The numbers of companies qu alified to do research in atomic energy, b iological warfare, and chemical warfare are not shown* 2 / Totals shown do not add, since many companies indicated that they were q u alified to do research in more than one research sp ecialty within an area of sp ecia lisa tio n . Sim ilarly, most companies indicated that they were q u alified in more than one area of sp ecialization . 106 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 0 —1953 ERRATUM Bureau of Labor Statistics Bulletin No. 1148, "Scientific Research and Development in American Industry" Page 8 3 j Table C-L2, i.d Column "Mean" cost per research engineer or scientist for "Nonprofit research agencies" with 500 to 4,999 employees should be t 17.000 instead of £ 7.0 00 .