View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

February 1957

Volume X X X I X

Number 2

ICONOMIC development of Southwest Missouri, originally retarded by
lack of trade routes, accelerated with the building of railroads after the
Civil War and highways in the 1920’s.
Population growth has been slow but per capita incomes have risen
faster than in the nation, reflecting increases in farm efficiency, rapid growth
of manufacturing, and a swelling tourist business. Retail trade and banking
have contributed to growth of the region.
Demand prospects for Southwest Missouri’s major farm products, manu­
factured items, and tourist attractions appear favorable to continued income
growth.

F ed eral

Operations of the FRB St. Louis in 1956— p • 25




iof Current Conditions— p. 30

T h e FOURTEEN COUNTIES shown above, comprising the area discussed in this article, do not, of course, constitute
all of the area commonly called the Ozarks. These counties were originally selected for analysis at a regional development
conference of Southwest Missouri bankers in November 1956.
As can be seen by the contour lines on the map, the area around Springfield is relatively level. On the northeast is the
hilly Lake of the Ozarks region. To the south is the rugged White River country. The rail lines and highways converging on
Springfield indicate the position of that city as a trade, manufacturing, and transportation center for the Ozarks.
Shading for lakes and rivers is not shown, nor is Table Hock Dam (depicted on the cover), which is just west of Branson
on the White River.

http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Source: Missouri Base Map, with Highways and Contours. Compiled in 1950, Highways corrected to 1952. U. S. Geological Survey and the State ot
Federal Reserve Bank of Missouri.
St. Louis

The Changing Ozarks
j/o

THE

H O N E S T , industrious and persevering home

seeker, to the capitalist and to the investor, we have a revela­
tion to make.

This revelation, be it understood, appertains

not to a glittering E l Dorado where fortunes can be plucked
like autumn pippins or where wealth may be gathered as
stones upon the highway; but we would disclose to you a
country where honest toil hath its sure and rich reward, and
where the investor surely gathereth in a goodly increase.

From foreword to Southwest Missouri,
published by the Southwest Missouri
Immigration Society in 1888.

Economic development of Southwest Missouri, , . .

T h e ONCE-POPULAR image of the Ozarks as a
country of simple mountaineers leading a picturesque
but stark life may have had roots in fact, but it is no
longer a true one. The few isolated hollows which
fit the description are now sought out by balladeers
and graduate students who hope to record something
of a vanishing way of life. The Ozarks are changing,
and anyone who tours Northwest Arkansas and South­
ern Missouri cannot help but see the change.
A good place to see the new Ozarks is in the four­
teen Southwest Missouri counties reviewed in this ar­
ticle. Springfield, a growing trade and transportation
center which is becoming increasingly industrial in
complexion, is the regions metropolis. Farms spread­
ing out from Springfield form one of the nation’s
larger milksheds and are also major suppliers of live­
stock and poultry. Smaller cities scattered across
the hills and prairies contain manufacturing plants
and bustling business districts. On the northern and
southern borders are recreation and resort areas: Lake
of the Ozarks and the Branson-Shepherd of the Hills
Country. Along U. S. 66 and the other highways which
lace the region together, motels and restaurants and
other businesses serve a rushing flow of travelers.




It is evident that the Southwest Missouri economy
is unusually diversified. To unravel some of its com­
plexity, the area’s economic history will be briefly
reviewed, and recent economic trends will be exam­
ined. Finally some assessment will be made of the
prospects of these fourteen counties.
. .. originally retarded by lack of trade routes, . . .

“There is, perhaps, no country in the world, where
cattle and hogs can be raised with so little expense
and trouble as here.” So said Henry Rowe School­
craft after exploring the Ozark Highlands in 1818 and
1819.1 The numerous springs, the river bottoms, and
the grassy prairies he saw suggested what is still one
of the chief activities of the area.
Thus, one of the main strands in the story of South­
west Missouri’s development can be picked up early:
the recognition and utilization of the area’s unique
combination of resources. Known today as the Spring­
field Plain, the central section of the area is a gently
rolling or almost level highland, based upon a resist­
ant limestone formation which provides some of the
best upland soil of the Ozarks. To the south, streams
have cut sharply downward to form picturesque trib­
utary valleys feeding into the White River Valley. To
the north, a somewhat similar terrain has been formed
by the Niangua and Osage Rivers and their tributaries.
The northern and southern fringes have their best
soils along the river bottoms.
Although livestock production was indicated by the
soils, climate, and terrain, the early settlers had
another very practical reason for specializing in live­
stock raising. The Ozarks to the east and south were
a jumbled wilderness and there were no easily nav­
igable rivers from the center of the area, so the pos­
sibilities for shipping out crops such as grain or cot­
ton were limited. But cattle and mules could walk
i Henry Rowe Schoolcraft, View of the Lead Mines, 1819, pp. 34-35.

Page 19

to market over the crude roads of the day, and salt
pork was valuable enough to justify a long wagon haul
and durable enough to survive it.
The other main strand of the area’s development is
the gradual breaking down of Southwest Missouri’s
isolation. As trade grew, possibilities for benefiting
from growth of the rest of the country expanded. The
growing interdependence of regions and communities
which is so well illustrated by the experience of
Southwest Missouri, is, of course, one of the principal
characteristics of the modern world economy.
In the first stage of Southwest Missouri’s develop­
ment, from 1820 to about 1850, population growth
was slow as settlement lagged behind other sections
of Missouri. The difficulties of moving into the area
are illustrated by the account of some families who
in 1822
. . left their homes in Ohio, traveling in a
keel boat down the Muskingum, Ohio, and Mississippi
Rivers, to the mouth of the Arkansas, thence ascend­
ing that river, the White River, and James Fork . .
to establish a settlement in Christian County.2 Most
of the early settlers came in by this southerly route,
many of them from Tennessee and Kentucky. Typify­
ing the frontiersmen of history and legend, these
pioneers did not take up the prairie land to any great
extent but located instead in wooded land along the
rivers and creeks.
A relatively self-sufficient economy grew up. Spring­
field, which had been established around 1822, be­
came a natural trade center for the territory. Manu­
facturing of farm implements grew out of an early
Springfield blacksmith shop and by 1850 “Lair’s
Prairie Breaker” was known for 100 miles around.
The farms were small, producing little more than was
needed for support of the families living on them, but
there was usually some small surplus which could be
brought to town. Corn, cotton, flax, and tobacco were
raised in small patches to meet household needs.
Water power sites were developed for gristmills and
sawmills; and their product, too, could be disposed of
in small part in Springfield. What trade there was
with the rest of the country was based primarily upon
the exports of livestock mentioned above. Expeditions
headed for the far West and Southwest in these years
and the growing needs of southern plantations pro­
vided a brisk demand for mules.
2 R. A. Campbell, Campbell’s Gazetteer of Missouri, Revised Edition, 1875,
p. 137.

Page 20




. . . accelerated with the building of railroads
after the Civil War . . .
Beginning of lead mining southwest of Springfield
in the 1850’s greatly stimulated outside interest in the
area. The Civil War, however, soon put a stop to eco­
nomic development. Several counties were virtually
depopulated and much hard-gained property was de­
stroyed as contending armies and guerilla bands
swept across the Springfield Plain. The growth inter­
rupted by the war was quickly resumed when the
fighting ceased. Emergence of Joplin as a lead and
zinc center in the 1870’s provided additional impetus.
Although Joplin is just outside the area under review
here, its explosive growth had wide repercussions. A
new wave of immigration began and railroads were
pushed down from St. Louis and Kansas City.
With railroads established, the 1880’s saw the final
breakdown of the area’s isolation. Commercial farm­
ing began in earnest, with a greater emphasis on rais­
ing of grain than had been true earlier. The optimis­
tic tone of efforts to attract immigrants is captured in
this statement from a Polk County prospectus in 1888:
“The work of settling this county, far from being com­
pleted, is as yet only in its infancy. With her broad
prairies, abundance of timber, water and fertile lands,
the breezes of this favored county will yet kiss the
cheek of many a sturdy man who comes to repeat the
success of those whom we have already welcomed.”3
3 Southwest Missouri Immigration Society, Southwest Missouri, 1888, p. 93.

Springfield square In 1875.
Drawn from a photograph in
the collection of the Springfield Art Museum.

, . . and highways in the 1920fs.

From the 1920’s on, the building of highways knit
Southwest Missouri even more firmly into the national
economy. As the growing metropolitan areas of St.
Louis, Kansas City, and Springfield itself became more
accessible, farmers of Southwest Missouri turned in­
creasing to dairying to meet the needs of urban
populations. Over the new roads came the ad­
vance guard of an army of tourists. And at long last
manufacturing plants began to produce for national
markets.4

Population

Thousands of Persons

Population growth has been slow but per capita incomes
have risen faster than in the nation, . . .

In the last half century population growth of the
area as a whole has practically stopped. In fact, most
of the counties contained fewer people in 1955 than
they did in 1900. The drop is the result of the wellknown migration of people from farm to city which
has been typical of recent American economic devel­
opment. In the years 1945 to 1954 alone the number
of farms in the area declined by nearly 6,000, or 18
per cent. Growth of Springfield and the other cities,
while substantial, has not been enough to absorb all
of the people leaving the farms. From 1940 to 1950,
for example, ufban population increased by 11,200,
while rural population went down 12,600.
Total personal income has grown more slowly in
the area since 1929 than in Missouri as a whole or in
the nation. But income per capita has grown faster
in Southwest Missouri than in the rest of the country.
The more rapid rate of per capita income growth
of Southwest Missouri is partly the result of the pop­
ulation movements mentioned above. The number
of people sharing the gains in total income has not
been growing so rapidly in Southwest Missouri as in
other areas; hence, the per capita gains are larger.
But other adjustments, such as changes in types of
occupations, increasing investment per worker, and
technological improvements are also playing a large
role. These forces can be clearly seen in a review of
postwar developments in each of the area's major
sources of income: agriculture, manufacturing, and
the recreation-travel business.
. . . reflecting increases in farm efficiency, , , .

Although nearly a fifth of the farm operators of
Southwest Missouri left agriculture between 1945 and
1954, the total value of farm products sold went up
30 per cent. The gain in value of sales was not just the
4
For a classic m onograph on the geography and early developm ent o f the
M issouri Ozarks see Carl O . Sauer, T he G eography o f the Ozark H igh lan d o f
M issouri (C h ica go: University o f C h icago Press, 1 9 2 0 ).




Source: Census o f Population. 1900-1950, Estimated fo r 195 5 by the Federal
Reserve Bank o f St. Louis.

result of price changes; pounds of whole milk sold
went up 31 per cfent, number of cattle and calves sold
rose 11 per cent, chickens increased 36 per cent, and
production of wheat, oats, and barley more than
doubled. The reduction in number of farms was all
in farms of less than 260 acres, and practically all of
the land given up was absorbed in other farms.
The greatest dollar gains in sales of farm products
between 1944 and 1954 were in dairy products and
crops, as can be seen from the chart on page 22. These
two groups accounted for $12.5 million of the $15 mil­
lion gain in total sales.
The growth in sales of dairy products was achieved
almost wholly through increases in production and
sales per cow. Attesting to the improvements that
have been made in the quality of herds and in
feeding practices, dollar sales per cow increased
by 37 per cent. All of the counties of the area
joined in the growth of dairy product sales, but there
were wide variations from county to county in rates
of increase. In Camden and Laclede counties sales
trebled and they more than doubled in Hickory Coun­
ty. Laclede County, with nearly a 50 per cent increase
in number of milk cows, had the greatest expansion of
commercial dairying of the area.
The increase in value of crops sold is an interesting
development for a part of the country which has been
primarily a livestock producer since the days of the
first settlers. Between 1944 and 1954, the value of
crops sold rose from 7 to 14 per cent of the total value
of farm product sales. The increases in crop produc­
tion have come in the small grains which can be used
Page 21

Farm Product Sales

Million Dollars

30 — ”

i
r

20

I 1949
I 1954

10

DAIRY

LIVESTOCK

POULTRY

CROPS

Source: Census of Agriculture, 1945, 1950, 1954.

for pasture as well as for cash crops. Because of dry
weather, corn has been used mainly for silage in the
last several years rather than harvested for grain. Soy­
beans, which have shown remarkable increases in the
rest of Missouri, are not raised to any significant ex­
tent in the southwestern part of the state.
Sales of livestock products other than dairy and
poultry were greater in 1949 than in 1944 or 1954. The
price decline which occurred between 1949 and 1954
reduced receipts from sale of livestock, although the
numbers of animals sold went up. During the 19441954 decade marketings of cattle and calves rose 11
per cent. The number of hogs sold declined 50 per
cent and the number of sheep marketed also went
down by about 50 per cent.
Sales of poultry products provide a good example
of the diversity of Southwest Missouri. In nine of the
fourteen counties the value of poultry products sold
went down sharply between 1944 and 1954. Sales in
the other five showed big gains. Barry and Stone
Counties joined the Arkansas counties just south of
them in a phenomenal expansion of commercial broil­
er raising. Camden, Dade, and Polk Counties made
gains through expansion of turkey raising. A decline
in egg production appears to be the main reason for
the drop in poultry product sales in the other counties.
As broiler and egg production nationally have come
to require more specialized and larger-scale opera­
tions for profitability, the keeping of small egg-laying
flocks as sideline ventures has diminished.
The postwar years have seen a general increase in
efficiency on Southwest Missouri farms. Although
Page 22




mechanization has not offered opportunities for laborsaving on as great a scale as in areas more specialized
in crop production, there has been a considerable
increase in use of milking machines, grain combines,
hay balers, and tractors. Other forms of investment
not easily measured have also been carried forward.
The building of trench silos, for example, has been
very widespread; and improvement of livestock has
been the object of determined efforts. Along with
acquiring more equipment, many operators have
bought or rented additional land, thus keeping in pro­
duction the land vacated by people who shifted away
from farming. This is one of the most significant ways
in which population movements have helped to bring
about a better combination of labor and resources in
Southwest Missouri agriculture.
Increased purchases of feed, fertilizer, and fuel
reflect the growing interdependence of farm and
town. This interdependence is perhaps most clearly
seen in broiler raising and dairying where close co­
ordination of the efforts of suppliers, farmers, proc­
essors, and shippers is necessary in order to meet
market requirements and to keep abreast of the
competition provided by other areas.
» . . rapid growth of manufacturing, . . .
Manufacturing is one of the fastest growing major
activities in Southwest Missouri. Value added by
manufacturing in the eight Southwest Missouri coun­
ties reported in a preliminary release of the recent
Census of Manufactures increased by 136 per cent
between 1947 and 1954, more than twice the Mis­
souri and United States rates.5 The Springfield Met­
ropolitan Area accounted for roughly two-thirds of
the manufacturing employment and payrolls of the
eight counties, but the other counties had slightly
faster rates of growth.
Manufactured products of the area include ma­
chinery, paper products, furniture, clothing, proc­
essed foods, fertilizer, feed, building materials, and
many others. A great variety of products is repre­
sented but output of nondurable goods provides most
of the employment, for much of the manufacturing
consists of processing farm products. Approximately
a third of Springfield manufacturing employment is
in food processing and another 40 per cent is in paper
products, apparel, and printing and publishing.
5 Value added by manufacturing is derived by subtracting the cost of raw
materials and other components from the value of shipments of manufacturing
establishments, and is the best measure available for comparing the relative
importance of manufacturing among industries and areas.
Reports for the other six counties were withheld from publication in the
preliminary Census release to avoid disclosing figures for individual companies
or for further checking of data.

Farms of the area provide a ready reservoir of
labor adaptable to the needs of manufacturing plants.
A tool and die plant in Lebanon which employs lo­
cally trained craftsmen and serves industrial custom­
ers in St. Louis, Detroit, and other manufacturing
centers provides good evidence of the adaptability
of Southwest Missouri workers. Tool and die makers
are among the most highly skilled of manufacturing
workers and are in critically short supply nationally.
As in other Eighth District areas, many industrial
workers in Springfield and other Southwest Missouri
cities commute considerable distances from their
farm homes.

, . .and a swelling tourist business.
Another source of area income which is growing
rapidly is the tourist business. Although direct meas­
ures of its total contribution to income are not avail­
able, the rapidity of its growth is indicated by increas­
es in retail sales and bank resources in the two coun­
ties which specialize the most in serving tourists. In
Taney County (Lake Taneycomo and Bull Shoals
Lake) total retail sales reported by the Census of
Business increased 43 per cent between 1948 and
1954, and in Camden County (Lake of the Ozarks)
sales went up 70 per cent. The increase for the area
as a whole was 21 per cent. Total bank resources
from mid-1945 to mid-1956 rose 171 per cent in Taney
County and 113 per cent in Camden County, as com­
pared to an area increase of 55 per cent. Both of
these measures, which change roughly in proportion
to changes in income, have thus grown more than
twice as much in Camden and Taney Counties as in
the rest of the area. The features of Camden and
Taney Counties and other sections of the Ozarks
which attract tourists are attractive also to people
seeking retirement homes. Growth in the number of
retired or semi-retired people has thus been an addi­
tional source of income.
While Camden and Taney Counties are the most
specialized in the tourist business, they by no means
contain all of Southwest Missouri’s attractions for vis­
itors, nor are they the only counties benefiting from
the travelers’ spending. Thousands of trout fishermen
come to Roaring River State Park in Barry County
and Bennett Spring Park in Dallas and Laclede
Counties every summer. Travelers buy food, gasoline,
lodging, and many other goods and services in every
one of the fourteen counties.
Tourists are not new to Southwest Missouri. Indeed,
the isolation of Southwest Missouri, which originally
retarded its development, has long been one of its




main charms for hunters and fishermen. Eldorado
Springs was one of several Southwest Missouri cities
which attracted health seekers by the hundreds before
the turn of the century. Lake Taneycomo Was formed
by the building of Powersite Dam during World War
I and has been a tourist attraction ever since. Lake
of the Ozarks was created in the 1920’s.
What is new about the tourist business is its size.
The long depression and the war held down the num­
ber of visitors and made the construction of facilities
difficult. But since the war the great rise in national
income, the almost universal institution of vacations
with pay, and the rise of the automobile population
have directed a flood of tourists into Southwest Mis­
souri which has swelled year by year.
Expanding facilities to accommodate the visitors
has required a large investment of capital. Old-timers
in the resort business hark back somewhat ruefully to
the days when the typical vacationer preferred to
rough it in a cabin equipped with a minimum of con­
veniences. Today the visitor looks for air-condition­
ing, TV, and other luxuries which he may or may not
be accustomed to at home.
A survey conducted by the Missouri Division of
Resources and Development in 1955 divided tourists
into three major groups according to their recreational
preferences.6 Roughly, 15-20 per cent were classified
as the “Ozarks-boaters-swimmers” group, preferring
strenuous activities and caring little for visiting his­
torical sites or fishing. Another 60 per cent, containing
most of the young couples with children and a major­
ity of older couples, was the “Ozarks-rest-fish-swim”
group. The people in this group are somewhat less
active than the first group and will go to some trouble
to visit an historical site, but not too much. The
third group, the “Ozarks-historical-resting” group, is
generally more affluent than the others, does a consid­
erable amount of traveling on vacation, and never
passes up an historical site. Providing entertainment
of all the kinds desired clearly requires development
of a wide range of specialized service businesses.
Currently, resort owners and others catering to
tourists are busy expanding and improving their fa­
cilities. In addition, construction of Table Rock Dam
on the White River near Branson, now well along,
will provide a 43,100-acre lake as another major attrac­
tion. A state park to include camping areas, public
beaches, boat docks, and a luxury hotel is planned for
construction at the dam site.
Division of Resources and Development Report of Advertising of State of
Missouri for Year of 1955.

Page 23

Retail trade and banking bare contributed
to op.rowth of/ the region*

The activities so far discussed—farming, manufac­
turing, and serving tourists—are the principal earners
of dollars from outside the area. They act as links
through which the Southwest Missouri economy is
affected by changes in the national economy. But
other activities are also important as producers of in­
come for area people. Retail trade, with total 1954
sales of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars and a total
payroll of $20.3 million, certainly ranks as one of the
most important activities of the area.
Dollar sales volume is only one measure of the im­
portance of retail trade in the area economy. Insofar
as sales are made to tourists, retailing counts as one
of the “export” activities. Furthermore, retail estab­
lishments take part indirectly in farming and manu­
facturing through sales to farms and industrial plants.
Part of the gain in farm productivity has resulted from
growth of establishments supplying the farmers' man­
ifold needs. For example, dealers in farm equipment,
feed, and fertilizer have aided in spreading improve­
ments in farming practices.
As would be expected in an area with a relatively
slow growth in total income, and virtually no growth
in population, expansion in sales of retail establish­
ments in Southwest Missouri from 1948 to 1954 was
smaller than the increase for the state as a whole.
Total retail sales in Southwest Missouri gained 21 per
cent, as compared to a growth of 28 per cent for the
state. Within the area there were wide variations in
sales performance, with changes over the period rang­
ing from an increase of 70 per cent in one county to a
decline of 9 per cent in another. About 80 per cent of
the $41.5 million gain in sales was made in the six
cities of over 2,500.
Banking has a strategic role in development of
Southwest Missouri. Expansion of credit requirements
has accompanied the growth of practically every kind
of business activity in the area. In June of 1956 the
forty-nine banks of the area had total resources of
about $167 million, nearly $60 million, or 55 per cent,
more than in mid-1945, Springfield banks holding ap­
proximately half of the total in both years. Total
bank resources of the state grew 42 per cent in the
same period. Over the period there were considerable
variations in rates of growth from county to county, as
a consequence of population shifts and changes in
business activity. The greatest increase was 171 per
cent in Taney County; whereas one county expe­
rienced a 3 per cent decline.
Page 24




Demand prospects for Southwest Missouri’s
major farm products, manufactured items,
and tourist attractions appear favorable
to rnntfnupd rnrnmp
.... prrtn .th

Throughout the history of Southwest Missouri two
major trends in development have stood out. First,
the people of the area have been able to produce more
and more with the resources available. Second, trade
with the rest of the country has had a profound in­
fluence in determining what the area produces and in
increasing the value of what is produced. The com­
bination of internal changes and growing interdepend­
ence with other areas has made the resources of
Southwest Missouri increasingly capable of supply­
ing a wide range of the nation’s industrial and house­
hold needs. This is economic diversification in its
most desirable sense.
In respect to the demand for farm products, South­
west Missouri is fortunate in being relatively special­
ized in production of meat, poultry products, and
dairy products. Per capita consumption of all three
of these foods generally increases as consumer income
rises. Thus, the demand for these products may be
expected to grow as national income and population
increase.
The demand for Southwest Missouri’s manufactured
products also should grow with national economic
growth. Especially significant for food processing is
the increasing demand of consumers for services, such
as freezing, pre-cooking, and packaging.
Perhaps the largest increase of all will come in the
demand for recreation and travel services. It is quite
likely that part of the fruits of future economic growth
will be taken in the form of increased leisure time.
With increased leisure, growing income, and rapidly
expanding population, Americans will be taking to
the road as never before.
How much the people of Southwest Missouri may
benefit from these widening prospects naturally will
depend upon how well the opportunities are met.
Fortunes may not yet be “plucked like autumn pip­
pins” but well-directed effort and sagacious invest­
ment in Southwest Missouri should surely bring a
“goodly increase.”
A. J. M eigs

yM m

1 9 5 6 OPERATIONS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS

O p ERATIONS of the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis during 1956 continued in heavy volume.
Check handling exceeded the annual record set in
1955, and items processed in other major operations
were close to or exceeded the prior years level. It is
interesting to note that the dollar volume of items
of all kinds processed in 1956 exceeded $190 billion
as compared with just under $180 billion in 1955.
Considerable progress was made during the year in
modernizing the Bank's facilities. Especially notable
was the progress in construction of the new Louisville
Branch building.

The aggregate amount of advances, including re­
newals, to member banks in 1956 under the discount
provisions of the Federal Reserve Act was within 3
per cent of the amount in 1955. The number of
banks served, however, was larger. On a daily aver­
age basis, the volume of loans outstanding was $22.3
million as against $22.5 million during 1955. Two
applications were received for loans under Regula­
tion V.

Volume of Operations

Other Activities

The volume of large-scale operations for the past
year and 1955 is shown by the table and charts on
pages 26 and 27. The most sizable percentage change
shown in major volume figures in the table occurred
in withheld tax receipts processed. A factor in this
increase was the handling of tax receipts from agri­
cultural employers due to a change in Treasury regu­
lations for 1956 which required that monthly deposits
be made through the banking system. The 8 per cent
decline in “Other Government Issues” reflected a
large reduction in the number of Treasury cash and
exchange offerings in comparison with other recent
years. Twenty banks were qualified for new Treas­
ury Tax and Loan Accounts.

Relations with member banks during the year were
maintained by many personal contacts in addition to
the usual financial transactions. Over 1,000 visits
were made on banks in the Eighth District and 36
area reports on business, agricultural and financial
conditions were prepared. A number of conferences,
likewise dealing with economic conditions, were co­
sponsored with bankers associations in Arkansas, Mis­
sissippi, Missouri and Tennessee. Over 2,500 persons,
largely students, were conducted on tours of St. Louis
or branch offices. More than twice that many viewed
films explaining the central banking function.




Discount Activity

Page 25

COMBINED VOLUME OF OPERATIONS
AT THE ST. LOUIS BANK AND THE LOUISVILLE, MEMPHIS
AND LITTLE ROCK BRANCHES IN 1956 AND 1955*
Number of Pieces Handled
Checks (Total).................................
City Checks.................................
Country Checks..........................
Checks on this Bank....................
Government Checks....................
Postal Money Orders....................
Currency............................................
C oin.....................................................
Transfer of Funds........... .................
Non-cash Collections......................
U. S. Government Interest
Coupons..........................................
Discounts and Advances..................
Safekeeping of Securities:
Securities Received and
Released...................................
Coupons Detached......................
Fiscal Agency Operations:
U. S. Savings Bonds Issued,
Exchanged, and Redeemed. . .
Other Government Issues...........
Withheld Tax Depository
Receipts Processed..................
Treasury Tax and Loan
Account Transactions.............

1956

1955

197,703,000
28,347,000
110,593,000
187,000
42,992,000
15,584,000
204,558,000
355,360,000
133,000
489,000

188,160,000
26,367,000
103,747,000
194,000
41,769,000
16,083,000
202,686,000
363,955,000
132,000
499,000

626,000
1,211*

629,000
1,450'

148,000
317,000

162,000
311,000

7,012,000
246,000

7,227,000
268,000

736,000

588,000

152,000

157,000

Checks Handled (Total)............. . $67,331,135,000
39,468,688,000
City Checks...............................
17,191,936,000
Country Checks........................
3,228,281,000
Checks on this Bank...............
7,171,032,000
Government Checks.................
271,198,000
Postal Money Orders...............
1,187,789,000
Currency..........................................
32,227,000
C oin.................................................
41,409,687,000
Transfer of Funds........................
346,052,000
Non-cash Collections....................
U. S. Government Interest
70,376,000
Coupons......................................
4,640,220,000
Discounts and Advances.........
Safekeeping of Securities:
34,278,000
Coupons Detached....................
Fiscal Agency Operations:
U. S. Savings Bonds Issued,
757,675,000
Exchanged and Redeemed. .
7,933,886,000
Other Government Issues.........

$62,711,565,000
36,912,579,000
15,742,548,000
2,907,168,000
6,877,984,000
271,286,000
1,158,495,000
32,681,000
39,090,607,000
346,842,000

Two new banks were admitted to the Federal Re­
serve System in the Eighth Federal Reserve District
during the year: the Bank of Arkansas, Little Rock,
Arkansas, and the Bank of Crossett, Crossett, Arkan­
sas. At year's end, there were 492 member banks in
the district.
In addition to progress in construction of the new
branch building in Louisville, extensive alteration and
modernization of the Little Rock Branch quarters
were completed during the year. At year-end plans
were in preparation for some interior alterations in
the Memphis Branch building. In the St. Louis office,
remodeling of the Money Department was completed
along with other improvements.
Customary internal audits of the Bank, including
the branches, were complemented by the annual exam­
ination in May by the Chief Federal Reserve Exam-

Dollar Volume

67,926,000
4,754,020,000
33,757,000

Total current earnings of the Federal Reserve Bank
of St. Louis increased from 1955 to 1956 by over $7
million as shown by the table on page 27. After de­
ducting expenses, current net earnings came to ap­
proximately $17.5 million. Payments of statutory
dividends to member banks in the Eighth District
amounted to $650,000. This Bank paid $15 million
to the Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes
and added $1.7 million to surplus.

852,570,000
8,041,503,000

x Figures rounded to the nearest thousand
* Exact number

Volume of Large-Scale Operations at the Federal
Mil.

Mil.

Thous.
800

Mil.

600

200

1956 1955
CHECKS

Page 26




1956 1955
CURRENCY and COIN

1956 1955
BONDS

1956 1955
WITHHELD TAXES

eral Reserve Bank of St. Louis for the year 1957. Mr. Moore, a

Earnings and Expenses Statement

Class C Director since March 1950, is engaged in .farming in

1955

Change

$24,402
6,931

$17,020
6,073

$ + 7,382
+ 858

17,471
Current net earnings..........................
3
Net additions ( + ) or deductions (— ). . . . —

10,947
— 25

+ 6,524
+
22

1956

(Thousands of Dollars)
Total current earnings...............................
Net expenses................................. .............

Net earnings before payments to
United States Treasury.................... .

Southeast Missouri, where he has been active in agricultural
affairs.
The Board of Governors also appointed Mr. J. H. Longwell,
Director, Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mis­

17,468

10,922

+ 6,546

Paid to United States Treasury
(Interest on Federal Reserve Notes). . . 15,136
650
Dividends paid..........................................
1,682
Transferred to surplus.............................

9,275
617
1,030

+ 5,861
+
33
+ 652

souri, Columbia, Missouri, as a Class C Director, effective Jan­
uary 1, 1957, to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of Mr.
Caffey Robertson. Mr. Longwell’s appointment is for the unex­
pired portion of a term ending December 31, 1958.
Elected by member banks as Directors were:

Personnel Changes
Total employment at the St. Louis, Little Rock,
Louisville and Memphis offices of the Bank was 1,145
at the end of 1956 compared with 1,155 at the end of
1955. Slight net reductions in personnel occurred at
St. Louis and Louisville and slight increases at Little
Rock and Memphis.

Mr. Kenton R. Cravens, President, Mercantile Trust Com­
pany, St. Louis, Missouri, elected by member banks in Group 1
as a Class A Director for a three-year term beginning January 1,
1957.

He succeeded Mr. William A. McDonnell of St. Louis

whose term expired at the end of the year.
Mr. Harold O. McCutchan, Executive Vice President, Mead
Johnson & Company, Evansville, Indiana, elected by member

The following designations and appointments include those
made in January 1957 as well as those made in December 1956:

banks in Group 3 as a Class B Director for a three-year term
beginning January 1, 1957.

He succeeded Mr. Louis Ruthen-

burg of Evansville whose term expired at the end of the year.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ap­
pointed Mr. Pierre B. McBride, Louisville, Kentucky, a Class
C Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis for a
three-year term beginning January 1, 1957, and designated
him Chairman of the Board and Federal Reserve Agent for the
year 1957. He succeeded Mr. M. Moss Alexander of St. Louis,
whose term expired at the end of the year. Mr. McBride is
President of Porcelain Metals Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky.
He had been a Director of the Louisville Branch since January
1951.

Appointments by the Board of Governors to the Boards of
Directors of the branches were:
Mr. T. Winfred Bell, President, Bush-Caldwell Company and
the Arkansas Electric Company, Little Rock Arkansas, reap­
pointed as a member of the Little Rock Branch Board for a
three-year term beginning January 1, 1957.
Mr. David F. Cocks, Vice President and Treasurer, Standard
Oil Company (Kentucky), Louisville, Kentucky, reappointed as

Mr. Joseph H. Moore, Charleston, Missouri, was designated
by the Board of Governors as Deputy Chairman of the Fed­

a member of the Louisville Branch Board for a three-year term
beginning January 1, 1957.

Reserve Bank of St. Louis and Branches— 1956 and 1955
Thous.

700

Thous.

Thous.

Thous.

500

500

Thous.
150

____ L_l
1956 1955
GOVT INTEREST COUPONS




1956 1955
NON-CASH COLLECTIONS

1956 1955
SAFEKEEPING

1956 1955
TAX and UOAN ACCOUNT

1956 1955
TRANSFER of FUNDS

Page 27

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS

February 1, 1957
Directors

Officers

Pierre B. McBride, Chairman of the Board
Delos C. Johns, President
Frederick L. Deming, First Vice President
Howard H. Weigel, Vice President and Secretary
Joseph C. Wotawa, Vice President
Dale M. Lewis, Vice President
William J. Abbott, Jr., Vice President
George E. Kroner, Vice President
Earl R. Billen, Assistant Vice President
John J. Christ, Assistant Vice President
Willis L. Johns, Assistant Vice President
Stephen Koptis, Assistant Vice President
Woodrow W. Gilmore, Assistant Vice President
John J. Hofer, Assistant Vice President
Marvin L. Bennett, Assistant Vice President
Guy S. Freutel, Assistant Vice President
W. E. Walker, Assistant Vice President
Paul Salzman, Assistant Vice President
Orville O. Wyrick, Chief Examiner
Gerald T. Dunne, Counsel and Assistant Secretary
George W. Hirshman, General Auditor

Pierre B. McBride, Chairman
Joseph H. Moore, Deputy Chairman
S. J. Beauchamp, Jr.

J. E. Etherton

Phil E. Chappell

J. H. Longwell

Kenton R. Cravens

Harold O. McCutchan

Leo J. Wieck

LITTLE ROCK BRANCH
A. Howard Stebbins, Jr.,

Chairman

Donald Barger
T. Winfred Bell
E. C. Benton

Shuford R. Nichols
H. C. McKinney, Jr.
J. V. Satterfield, Jr.

Fred Burton, Vice President and Manager
Sherley C. Davis, Cashier
Clifford Wood, Assistant Cashier
W. J. Bryan, Assistant Cashier

LOUISVILLE BRANCH
David F. Cocks, Chairman
Philip Davidson
Magnus J. Kreisle

M. C. Minor
J. D. Monin, Jr.
Merle E. Robertson

Victor M. Longstreet, Vice President and Manager
Donald L. Henry, Cashier
L. K. Arthur, Assistant Cashier

W. Scott McIntosh

MEMPHIS BRANCH
A. E. Hohenberg, Chairman
Henry Banks
J. H. Harris
John A. McCall
Page 28



William B. Pollard
John D. Williams
John K. Wilson

Darryl R. Francis, Vice President and Manager
Wilbur H. Isbell, Cashier
H. C. Anderson, Assistant Cashier
Benjamin B. Monaghan, Assistant Cashier

Mr. Philip Davidson, President of the University of Louis­
ville, Louisville, Kentucky, appointed as a member of the
Louisville Branch Board for the unexpired portion of a term
ending December 31, 1957.
Mr. John D. Williams, Chancellor, The University of Mis­
sissippi, University, Mississippi, reappointed as a member of the
Memphis Branch Board for a three-year term beginning Janu­
ary 1, 1957.
Appointments by the Board of Directors of the Federal Re­
serve Bank of St. Louis to the Boards of Directors of the
branches were:
Mr. Donald Barger, President, Peoples Exchange Bank, Rus­
sellville, Arkansas, reappointed as a member of the Little Rock
Branch Board for a three-year term beginning January 1, 1957.
Mr. Merle E. Robertson, Chairman of Board and President,
Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Louisville, Louis­
ville, Kentucky, appointed as a member of the Louisville
Branch Board for a three-year term beginning January 1, 1957.
Mr. John K. Wilson, President, The First National Bank of
West Point, West Point, Mississippi, reappointed as a member
of the Memphis Branch Board for a three-year term beginning
January 1, 1957.




The Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis also reappointed Mr. Lee P. Miller as a member of the
Federal Advisory Council to represent the Eighth Federal Re­
serve District for the year 1957. Mr. Miller is President of the
Citizens Fidelity Bank and Trust Company, Louisville, Ken­
tucky.
The following official appointments and changes were made
by the Board of Directors during 1956:, George E. Kroner,
Vice President; Orville O. Wyrick, Chief‘Examiner; Effective
January 1, 1957, Sherley C. Davis, Donald L. Henry, and Wil­
bur H. Isbell were promoted to the position of Cashier at their
respective Branches, Little Rock, Louisville, and Memphis, and
Benjamin B. Monaghan was appointed Assistant Cashier of the
Memphis Branch. The official title of Assistant Manager at the
branches was discontinued on January 1, 1957.
William E. Peterson retired as Vice President in charge of
the Bank’s Examination Department on June 1, 1956. C. E.
Martin retired as an Assistant Manager of the Memphis Branch,
effective August 1, 1956. Lee S. Moore, an Assistant Cashier of
the Louisville Branch, died January 5, 1957.

oF CURRENT CONDITIONS
Released for publication February 1

A.

LEVELING OFF OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
was apparent in the opening weeks of the new year.
Factory output in January averaged about the same
rate as in December, after allowance for seasonal
factors. Department store sales dropped more than
usual and were about equal to the year earlier level.
The number of new cars retailed in the first twenty
days of January continued below the corresponding
period of 1956. The number of insured unemployed
increased more than usual from mid-December to
mid-January, suggesting a larger than usual drop in
employment in January. Surveys of planned outlays
for plant and equipment had indicated a slight fur­
ther increase in the current quarter, but in January
postponements of some major plant expansions were
announced. The value of c o n s t r u c t i o n contract
awards in December was down moderately, reflecting
a sharp drop in residential building, continuing the
downward trend which began in early 1956.
Price trends were mixed during January. Prices of
some industrial materials in the sensitive spot markets
weakened. Scrap prices of steel, aluminum and cop­
per and prices of crude natural rubber and refined
copper at custom smelters declined. But despite scat­
tered price cuts, the average wholesale price index
continued to advance. Farm products, processed
foods and other commodities all moved higher. The
latter index was largely influenced by higher prices
for finished steel items, petroleum and petroleum
products.
Industry
Industrial activity in the Eighth District showed
mainly seasonal changes in December and early
January, with output slacking off during the holiday
season and recovering during the first few weeks of
1957.
Steel mills in the St. Louis area operated at be­
tween 92 and 98 per cent of capacity in January,
close to the national average. Rated capacity in the
area for 1957 is some 6 per cent higher than in 1956.
December operations averaged 89 per cent and Janu­
ary a year ago 99 per cent of 1956 capacity.
Page 30



Most automobile plants in the district stabilized
on regular 5-day week schedules as new-model pro­
duction problems were largely overcome and output
demands became less urgent. Production rates in
January were comparable to a year ago. After solv­
ing inventory problems, farm equipment makers in­
creased production rates, and at Louisville and Mem­
phis workers laid off in late 1956 were being rehired.
Output of household appliances slowed in keeping
with lower than expected retail sales in December.
Crude oil output in the district continued the high
November rate during December; at 395,000 barrels
peir day, output was well above December rates in
recent years. Coal production in December dropped
off from November and from year-ago rates in the
Eighth District and in the nation.
Southern pine lumber production in December was
at the lowest rate in three years, though weekly rates
recovered in mid-January to equal those of Janu­
ary 1956. Hardwood mill rates in December were
likewise the lowest in several years and continued
below year-ago rates in January.

BASIC COMMODITY PRICES
1947-49*100

Shoe production in the nation was estimated at 50
million pairs in January, above the December output
rate but below January 1956. District shoe produc­
tion normally parallels national trends.

to rise throughout 1956, reaching $2.05 in December,
a rise of 6 per cent in a year. Reflecting the record
levels of employment and rising wage rates in the
nation, incomes also advanced.

Livestock slaughter in the St. Louis area slacked
off somewhat from the high rates of last fall, dropping
below year-ago rates in December and January. The
decline stemmed very largely from decreased hog
marketings.

Trade
With record levels of income, consumer spending
at retail stores in November and December reached
the high point of the year, up 4 per cent from the
same months of 1955, However, in the first four
weeks of January, department store sales in the nation
and district declined more than seasonally from De­
cember, and were only about equal to sales in the
corresponding period of 1956.

Construction
Construction contracts awarded in 37 eastern states
in December continued to decline on a seasonally
adjusted basis and were substantially less than a
year earlier. Nonresidential building awards were
off slightly from December 1955, and residential
building continued to weaken further. The value of
residential awards in December fell 37 per cent from
a year earlier. The number of private nonfarm
housing starts, on a seasonally adjusted annual rate
basis, declined from 1.2 million in January of 1956
to 1.0 million in December. Among other factors,
the decline has been widely attributed to less favor­
able terms offered borrowers and the limited availa­
bility of mortgage investment funds. Government
action has been taken recently to increase the flow
of credit for residential purposes, but to date there
has been little improvement in the market for Fed­
erally underwritten mortgages.
In the district, construction contracts awarded
showed less favorable trends than the nation. Con­
struction contract awards in December were 21 per
cent less than a year earlier. The drop was con­
centrated wholly in residential awards which were
off 50 per cent.
Labor M arket$

After several months of virtual stability in the last
part of 1956, the nations labor market apparently
weakened in January. The uptrend in employment
which began in mid-1954 leveled off in the last half
of 1956, after allowance for seasonal movements.
Insured unemployment in the nation rose faster from
mid-December to mid-January than in the same
period a year earlier, suggesting that employment
may have dropped more than the usual amount in
January. The number of insured unemployed con­
tinued larger than a year earlier.
Nonagricultural employment in December 1956
was less than a year earlier in the St. Louis, Louisville
and Evansville metropolitan areas. In Memphis and
Springfield employment was slightly larger, and in
Little Rock it was virtually the same as a year earlier.
Average hourly earnings of production workers in
manufacturing establishments in the nation continued




In December and the first twenty days of January,
the number of new cars retailed was less than a year
earlier. Expectations for a continuation in the up­
trend in business activity in 1957 had been based in
part upon forecasts of improvement in new automo­
bile sales. The difficulty of clearly evaluating the
trend in sales led auto producers to cut back sched­
uled deliveries of steel and other supplies.
Several reasons for the less than expected sales per­
formance have been mentioned. Perhaps most im­
portantly, the supply of 1957 models has been re­
stricted by production difficulties. But consumers
were not attracted by the nominal changes in some
new models, and they all bore higher price tags.
Other factors that may have limited sales were tie
conservative selling p r a c t i c e s of dealers and the
small equity of some 1955-model owners, many of
whom would normally be expected to trade-in for
the new models.
Banking

During the five weeks ended January 23 total loans
at district weekly reporting banks declined $43 mil­
lion or 2/2 per cent, somewhat more than usual for
this period. All major loan categories except ad­
vances on real estate showed reductions. The de­
crease in business loans amounted to $37 million.
Manufacturers of textiles, apparel and leather and
public utilities added more to their outstanding in­
debtedness than the average increase during the cor­
responding weeks of recent years. Net repayments
from processors and distributors of agricultural prod­
ucts were about normal for this time. On the other
hand, trade concerns (primarily wholesale) and con­
tractors made substantial net repayments in the
period.
"Other” loans, largely consumer, declined in the
five weeks ended January 23, with the contraction
centering at banks in St. Louis and Louisville. The
advance in real estate loans, about 1 per cent, was in
contrast to little change usual at this time.
Page 31

VARIOUS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY
Industrial Use of Electric Power (Thousands of KWH per working day, selected
industrial firms in 6 district cities)...............................................................................
Steel Ingot Rate, St. Louis area (Operating rate, per cent of capacity)........................
Coal Production Index— Sth Dist. (Seasonally adjusted, 1 9 4 7 -4 9 = 1 0 0 )..................
Crude Oil Production— 8th Dist. (Daily average in thousands of bbls.)...............
Freight Interchanges at St. Louis. (Thousands of cars— 25 railroads— Termi­
nal R. R. Assn.) ................................................................................................................
Livestock Slaughter— St. Louis area. (Thousands of head— weekly average).........
Lumber Production— S. Pine (Average weekly production— thousands of bd. ft.) .
Lumber Production— S. Hardwoods. (Operating rate, per cent of capacity)...........

Dcc. 1956*
compared with
Nov. 1956 Dec. 195.:

Dec.
1956
n.a.
89
80.9 p
394.9

n.a.
— 14
__ 2
-0 -

n.a.
— 14
— 12
+ 7

99.8
129.2
191.7
80

— 3
— 8
— 8
— 12
— 8
— 4
— 10
— 10
*
Percentage change is shown in each case. Figures for the steel ingot rate, Southern hardwood rate, and the coal
production index, show the relative percentage change in production, not the drop in index points or in percents of
capacity.
p Preliminary, n.a. Not available.

tu r*
BANK DEBITS1

! 150.9
181.7
Evansville, Ind............
202.4
Little Rock, Ark. . .
996.2
Louisville, Ky..............
876.5
Memphis, Tenn...........
2,578.5
St. Louis, M o ..........
Total— Six Largest
Centers ............. .$4,986.2

—

1%

+
3
+ 2

+ 14%
+ 3

+ 13
— 3

+ 10

+ 1
+ 1
+ 7
+ 6

+

+

7%

5%

s:

Total— Other
Centers .............

-0 -%
+ 8
+ 14
-0 — 9
+ 6
— 19
— 18
+ 2
+ 28
+ 16
— 28
-0 + 4
— 1
+ 3

$ 611.5
$5,597.7

+

— 12%
+ 18
— 1
— 2
— 13
— 3
— 5
— 21
+ 15
+ 16
+ 9
— 3
+ 5
+ 1
+ 8
— 4

1
0
1

38.7
20.0
30.8
56.2
29.7
11.2
12.0
27 2
76.4
63.6
32.3
43.9
42.0
16.2
89.5
21.8

Alton, 111...................
Cape Girardeau, M<
El Dorado, Ark. .
Fort Smith, Ark. . .
Greenville, Miss.
Hannibal, Mo..........
Helena, Ark.............
Jackson, Tenn..........
Jefferson City, Mo.
Owensboro, Ky. . . .
Paducah, Ky............
Pine Bluff, Ark. . . .
Quincy, 111. ...........
Sedalia, Mo.............
Springfield, Mo. . . .
Texarkana, Ark.

+

2%

6%

+

4%

INDEX OF BANK DEBITS— 22 Centers
Seasonally Adjusted (1947-1949= 100)
1956
1955
Dec.
Nov.
Dec.,
172.9
179.5
165.5
1 Debits to demand deposit accounts of individuals,
partnerships and corporations and states and political
subdivisions.

Percentage Change
Tan. thru Nov.
Nov. ’56
1956
(In thousands Nov.
from
compared with
of dollars)
1956
Nov. ’55 1955
1954
Arkansas . . . $ 75,952
— 33% + 20% + 9%
Illinois . .
166,504
+ 18
+ 13
+ 4
Indiana. . .
83,330
+ 14
— 5
+ 2
Kentucky
+ 44
62,438
— 1
— 5
Mississippi
50,654
— 52
+ 5
+ 8
Missouri. .
104,038
— 1
+ 7
+ 1
Tennessee.
— 15
51,043
-0 + 11
7 States .
— 7
+ 9
+ 1
— 18
+ 3
+ 9
Source: State data from USDA preliminary
estimates unless otherwise indicated.

(1947-1949= 100)
Nov. 1956 Oct. 1956 Nov. 1955
Unadjusted
Total
Residential
All Other

160.7 p
148.1 p
166.6 p

187.6
174.0
194.0

Seasonally adjusted
Total
187.5 p
Residential
174.2 p
All Other .
193.7 p

200.8
281.4
163.4

210.4
177.6
225.6

234.7
331.1
190.0
* Based on three-month moving average
(centered on mid-month) of value of awards, as
reported by F. W. Dodge Corporation.

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF EIGHTH DISTRICT MEMBER BANKS
(In Millions of Dollars)

Weekly Reporting Banks

Assets

Jan. 23, 1957

Loans* .....................................
Business and Agricultural .
Security
...........
Real Estate ........................
Other (largely consumer) .
U. S. Government Securities
Other Securities ....................
Loans to Banks ......................
Cash Assets ............................
Other Assets ..........................
Total Assets ......................

$1,659
881
51
276
477
872

221

6

894
41
$3,693

Change from
Dec. 19,
1956
$— 46
— 37
—
3

± I
— 23
+ 1

— 25
— 87
—
7
$— 187

All Member Banks
Change from
Nov. 28,
1956
$+52

Dec. 26,
1956
$2,690

1,945
495

18

+ 8

1,631
74
$6,835

+ 125

+ 2

$ + 205

Liabilities and Capital
Demand Deposits of Banks . . . .
$ 714
$— 82
$+70
Other Demand Deposits .............
— 94
2,036
4,084
+ 97
Time Deposits ............................
584
1,279
+ 15
+ 2
Borrowings and Other Liabilities
— 13
77
109
+ 13
Total Capital Accounts ...............
282
-0501
+ 10
Total Liabilities and Capital .
3,693
$— 187
$6,835
$ + 205
1 For weekly reporting banks, loans are adjusted to exclude loans to banks; the total is reported
net; breakdowns are reported gross. For all member banks, loans are reported net and include loans
to banks; breakdown of these loans is not available.

Stocks
on Hand
Net Sales
Dec., 1956
The year,’56
compared with
to same
Nov., ’56 D ec.,’55 period ’55

Percentage of Accounts
Stocks- and Notes Receivable
Sales Outstanding Dec. 1, ’56,
Ratio collected during Dec.
Excl.
Instal. Instalment
Accounts Accounts

16
47
8th F.R. District Total . . -(-36%
+ 5%
- - 1%
43
Fort Smith Area, Ark.1 . . -f-42
+ 1 + + 4
12
39
Monthly stocks and
— 1
Little Rock Area, Ark.. . . + 4 1
+ 5
___ 2
— 3
stocks-sales ratio data
Quincy, 111......................... + 3 9
__ 2
not available in time
+ 2
Evansville Area, Ind........ + 2 1
39
19
for publication in the
-0 + 4
Louisville Area, Ky., Ind. + 4 1
Monthly Review. Data
+ 11
+ 14
Paducah, Ky......................+ 4 0
17
58
will be supplied upon
— 1
+ 4
St. Louis Area, Mo., 111.
+35
request.
+ 5
Springfield Area, M o........ + 4 2
+ 1
___ 2
33’
14
+ 5
Memphis Area, Tenn.. . . + 3 3
+ 11
All Other Cities2 ............. + 4 1
+ 7
1 In order to permit publication of figures for this city (or area), a special sample has been con­
structed which is not confined exclusively to department stores. Figures for any such nondepartment
stores, however, are not used in computing the district percentage changes or in computing depart­
ment store indexes.
- Fayetteville, Pine Bluff, Arkansas; Harrisburg, Mt. Vernon, Illinois; Vincennes, Indiana; Dan­
ville, Hopkinsville, Mayfield, Owensboro, Kentucky; Chillicothe, Missouri; Greenville, Mississippi;
and Jackson, Tennessee.
Outstanding orders of reporting stores at the end of December, 1956, were 9 per cent smaller than
on the corresponding date a year ago.
INDEXES OF SALES AND STOCKS— 8TH DISTRICT
Dec.
1956
. 216
130
n.a.
n.a.

Nov.
1956
161
134
154
137

Sales (daily average), unadjusted3 ........................................
Sales (daily average), seasonally adjusted3 ..........................
Stocks, unadjusted4 ................................................................
Stocks, seasonally adjusted4 ...................................................
3 Daily average 19 47-4 9= 100
4 End of Month average 1 9 47-4 9= 100
n.a. Not available.
Trading days: Dec., 1956— 25; Nov., 1956—-25;
25; Dec., 1955— 26.




OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
AWARDED EIGHTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT*

p Preliminary

DEPARTMENT STORES

<U

v

Oct.
1956
131
119
153
137

Dec.
1955
208
125
120
133

RETAIL FURNITURE STORES
Net Sales
Inventorie
Dec., 1956
Dec., 1956
compared with
compared with
Nov., ’56 Dec., ’55 Nov., ’ 56 Dec., ’55
8th Dist. T otall. . n.a.%
St. Louis Area . . n.a.
Louisville Area. . . + 2 i
+ 23
Memphis Area
Little Rock Area. + 20
Springfield Area . n.a.

n.a.%
n.a.
— 10
— 31
— 7
n.a.

n.a.%
n.a.
— 11
*
— 12
n.a.

n.a.
n.a.
+

Six Largest Centers:
East St. Louis—National Stock Yards,

111. ■■................

e ^ sINDEX

CASH FARM INCOME

December
1956
compared with
(In
November December
millions)
1956
1955

*
+ 8
n.a.

* Not shown separately due to insufficient coverage,
but included in Eighth District totals.
1 In addition to the following cities, shown s e p a r a t e l y
in the table, the total includes stores in Blytheville, Fort
Smith, Pine Bluff, Arkansas; Owensboro, Kentucky;
Greenwood, Mississippi; Evansville, Ind.; and Cape Gi­
rardeau, Missouri.
Note: Figures shown are preliminary and subject to
revision.

PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF
FURNITURE SALES
Dec., ’56
Cash Sales ............... ..... n.a.%
Credit Sales ............. ..... n.a.
Total Sales ................ n.a.%
n.a. Not available.

Nov.,’ 56
n.a.c;
n.a.

Dec.,’55
n.a.%
n.a.