View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

e v ie w '
FED ER A L RESERVE BANK
OF ST. LOUIS

• P. O. BOX 442 • ST. LOUIS 66, MO.

Page

Liquidity Developments in Three Business Cycles

2

Signs of a Business Turn?

6

District Banking in Early 1961

10

The Stock Market in Recent Months

12

VO L. 4 3




• NO. 4

• A PR IL ’61

Liquidity Developments in Three Business Cycles

T h e QUANTITY OF MONEY and holdings of
other liquid assets have an important influence on the
level of economic activity. Although money provides
the highest degree of liquidity, it is only one of numer­
ous assets which may satisfy the public’s desires for
liquidity. Economic analysis has given some attention
to the relationship between the actual holdings of liquid
assets and the desired holdings of liquid assets.1
Around this concept of liquidity has developed an
explanation of forces contributing to expansion and
contraction in spending, i.e., total demand for goods
and services. In its simplest form the explanation
is as follows: If the publics actual holdings of liquid
assets are greater than its desired holdings, spending
tends to expand. If, on the other hand, the public
desires more liquidity than it actually possesses, spend­
ing tends to fall.
Some policy implications of this liquidity analysis,
briefly stated, are that when total demand for goods
and services is insufficient to maintain reasonably full
employment, the quantity of liquid assets should be
increased. During times when total spending is ex­
cessive and tending to cause price inflation, an oppo­
site policy is indicated.
This article does not attempt to inquire into the
soundness of either the theory or the policy implica­
tions. Also, no attempt will be made to estimate
changes in the desired liquidity of the public. Rather,
some facts are presented relating to fluctuations in
the actual holdings of selected liquidity instruments
during the three most recent business cycles.2 The
public’s holdings of liquid assets are analyzed in two
major classes: those assets whose volume is largely
under the control of public policy and those over
1 The term ‘‘liquid assets,” broadly defined, includes money and
other assets which can readily be converted into cash without
significant loss. These other assets, often referred to as “near­
money,” have many characteristics of money.
2 Fluctuations are measured over a period covering ten months
before and ten months after the three most recent peaks in
business activity. The article uses National Bureau of Econ­
omic Research reference dates, July 1953 and August 1957,
which were based on a consideration of ten indicators of
economic activity. Although there is no agreed-upon date
for the beginning of the most recent economic contraction,
May 1960 was selected for this article.

Page 2




which the Government has very little direct control.
The former include currency, deposits of commercial
banks and short-term Government securities while the
latter refer to savings and loan shares, deposits in
mutual savings banks and United States savings bonds.
One further disclaimer is appropriate before pro­
ceeding further. While the public’s so-called liquid­
ity position can readily be discussed in theory, it is a
concept that does not lend itself to exact measure­
ment. The public’s view of the liquidity of a par­
ticular asset may change from time to time and the
concept “liquidity” is a relative term. For instance,
when does a Government security become a liquid
debt instrument? A 30-year bond at date of issue
is not generally considered a liquid asset. However,
this same bond 90 days from maturity could be con­
sidered a liquid asset. At what point in time did this
bond take on all the characteristics of a liquid debt
instrument? Any attempt to measure changes in the
public’s liquidity involves rather arbitrary decisions
as to which items are to be considered liquid assets.
Furthermore, the availability of credit (a concept which
does not lend itself to exact measurement) influences
the public’s liquidity.

Money Supply
The money supply, defined as demand deposits and
currency, is the most liquid of all assets. All other
assets are classified in terms of their nearness to
money. The volume of money in existence is in­
fluenced by the volume of reserves which the Re­
serve Banks make available to member banks. From
the peak in business activity in May 1960 through
February 1961 (the latest month for which data are
available) the money supply, adjusted for seasonal
variations, expanded at an annual rate of about 1.3
per cent. This was roughly the same rate of expan­
sion that occurred in the first nine months following
the previous two peaks in business activity (see Chart I).
The most striking difference between the behavior
of the money supply during the present busines cycle
and previous cycles occurred in the expansionary
phase leading up to the peak in activity. The money

I

II

M one y Supply
Peaks—100

S e a s o n a lly Adjusted

Time Deposits
P eo ks= 100

Peaks —100

M onth s from Peak

M onths from Peak

supply contracted at an annual rate of 2.9 per cent
during the ten months prior to the May 1960 peak.
This was in sharp contrast to the 2.3 per cent annual
rate of expansion in the like period before the 195354 recession and the leveling off in the months pre­
ceding the August 1957 downturn.

Peaks—100

S e a s o n a lly A d ju ste d

III

M o n e y Supply and Time Deposits
Peaks = 100

S e a s o n a lly A d ju ste d

Peaks —100

Time Deposits
Time deposits of commercial banks possess many
of the characteristics of money. Like demand de­
posits, the major component of the money supply,
time deposits are liabilities of commercial banks. The
total volume of bank reserves influences the volume of
total deposits, both demand and time.
Time deposits have expanded at an annual rate of
13 per cent in the nine months since the May 1960
peak (see Chart II). This was slightly less than the
the nine months following the August 1957 peak but
higher than the 7 per cent annual rate of increase dur­
ing the first nine months of the 1953-54 recession.
However, time deposits grew at a substantially slower
pace during the ten months preceding the May 1960
peak than in the two previous expansionary phases.

Money Supply Plus Tim e Deposits
The money supply plus time deposits—a concept
some analysts term money—grew at a greater rate
during the 1960-61 recession than during the two
previous business downturns. Total commercial bank
deposits and currency increased at an annual rate of
5.2 per cent from May 1960 to February 1961 (see
Chart III), compared with a 4.4 per cent and 2.1 per




M o n th s from Peak

cent rate of expansion during the comparable periods
of the 1957-58 and 1953-54 recessions.
In the ten months prior to May 1960 the money
supply, broadly defined, declined at an annual rate
of 1.3 per cent. In the ten months preceding the
peaks of the two previous cycles the annual rate of
expansion in money supply plus time deposits was
about 3.5 per cent.

Short-term Government Securities
Short-term Government securities, that is, Treasury
bills and other publicly held marketable Treasury
issues with less than one year to maturity, are also
important liquidity instruments and, like time de­
posits, are close substitutes for money. Commercial
Page 3

banks, other financial institutions, large corporations,
foreign, state, and local governments, and trust funds
frequently place their temporarily idle cash balances
in these securities. An important feature of short-term
Governments is that the quantity outstanding is large­
ly at the discretion of the Government in the sense
that the Treasury can place the Federal debt in liquid
short - term instruments, long - term investment - type
issues, or in intermediate-term issues. The securities
issued depend on many considerations, the liquidity
of the public being only one.
From May 1960 through January 1961, the latest
month for which data are available, the quantity of
U. S. Government securities maturing in one year or
less in the hands of the nonbank public declined at an
annual rate of 16 per cent (see Chart IV). The quan­
tity of short-term Government securities contracted
substantially more during the early months of the
present recession than during similar months of the
past recessions.

Publicly Controlled Liquidity
Chart V combines money supply, time deposits, and
short-term Government securities held by the non­
bank public into a single measure of liquidity. The
movement of this series about the peaks of the recent
business cycles represents changes in the public’s
liquid assets which are, to some degree, controlled by
the Federal Reserve System, which regulates bank
deposits, and the Treasury, which controls the quan­
tity of short-term securities outstanding.3
V
M on e y Supply, Time Deposits
and Short-Term Governm ent Securities
Peaks = 100

S e a so n a lly A d ju ste d

Peaks —100

IV
U.S. Government Securities
M aturing Within O ne Year
Peaks—100

Peaks= 100

Se a so n a lly Ad ju ste d

108
104
M onth s from Peak

100

96
92

88
84

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

M onth s from Peak

In the ten months prior to the May 1960 peak in
business activity, the volume of short-term Govern­
ments declined on balance, most of the decline con­
centrating in the months just preceding the turning
point. By contrast, the quantity of Government se­
curities maturing within one year increased at an
annual rate of 18 per cent and 9 per cent in the ten
months prior to the August 1957 and July 1953 peaks,
respectively.
Page 4




The liquid assets of the public as measured by
money supply, time deposits, and short-term Gov­
ernments expanded at an annual rate of 0.4 per cent
during the eight months following the May 1960
peak. This compares with an annual rate of increase
of about 1.1 per cent during the eight months follow­
ing the previous two peaks in economic activity. In­
dications, based on the recent expansion in the money
supply and time deposits as well as the Treasury debt
management operations, are that this measure of the
publics liquidity has expanded in the last few months.
The expansion over the ten months from last May to
March was probably comparable to the expansion
which occurred in the like months of the previous
recessions.
3 The Government also influences the liquidity of the public in
other ways, such as issuing marketable securities with maturi­
ties just over a year, creating the Federal Savings and Loan
Insurance Corporation and guaranteeing mortgages. However,
total commercial bank deposits and short-term Government
securities are the instruments through which the Government
acts directly on the public's actual liquidity position.

There is a striking dissimilarity between the move­
ment of this measure of liquidity in the ten months
preceding the recent peak and the movements lead­
ing up to the other two most recent peaks. From
October 1956 to August 1957, the increase on an
annual basis was 5.5 per cent and from September
1952 to July 1953 the annual rate of increase was 4.6
per cent. In the ten months leading up to the May
1960 peak there was a 1.3 per cent rate of decline in
this measure of liquidity.

In the ten months preceding the May 1960 down­
turn, the public’s liquidity position was about un­
changed on balance, the growth in savings and loan
shares and time deposits being offset by a declining
money supply and a reduction of short-term Govern­
ment debt instruments. In the ten months preceding
the August 1957 and July 1953 peaks the public’s total
liquidity position expanded at an annual rate of about
4.4 per cent
VII
Total L iquid A s s e ts

Total L iq u id Assets
A more comprehensive measure of the public’s
actual liquidity is attained if savings and loan shares,
deposits in mutual savings banks, and United States
savings bonds are added to money supply, time de­
posits, and short-term Government se cu rities (see
Chart VI). This measure will be referred to as total

Perce ntage D istrib u tion
Per Cent
100
S A V IN G S B O N D S
DEPOSITS IN M U T U A L
S A V IN G S BANKS
S A V IN G S & L O A N
SHARES
MARKETABLE
U.S . G O V ' T S .
M aturing w ithin 1 y ear

VI
Total Liquid Assets
P e a k s—100

S e a s o n a l l y A d j u s te d

T IM E D E P O S I T S

P eaks—100

D E M A N D DEPOSITS
& CURRENCY

D a t a as o f e n d o f y e a r

Sum m ary

M on th s fr o m P e a k

liquid assets, although it should be understood the use
of the word “total” does not imply that this is an allinclusive list. Total liquid asset holdings of the pub­
lic expanded at an annual rate of 3.7 per cent during
the period May 1960-January 1961. Indications are
that this rate of increase continued about unchanged
in the first quarter of 1961. In the eight months fol­
lowing each of the previous business cycle peaks, total
liquid assets expanded at an annual rate of about 2.5
per cent. The rapid growth in the public’s total
liquidity since May of 1960 was due in part to a rapid
growth in savings and loan shares which expanded at
an annual rate of 13 per cent.




Public holdings of liquid assets expanded at a more
rapid rate during the 1960-61 recession than in the
like periods of the two preceding recessions. A
notable exception to this generalization was the un­
usually sharp decline in short-term Government securi­
ties in the hands of the public. In the ten months
prior to May 1960 liquid assets held by the public
changed little on balance largely as a result of the con­
traction in the quantity of bank deposits and short­
term Government securities. By contrast, in the months
preceding the peak of the previous cycles, total liquid
assets of the public expanded at a rapid rate.

Subscriptions to the M o n t h l y R e v i e w are available

to the public without charge. For information con­
cerning bulk mailings to banks, business organizations,
educational institutions, and others write: Research
Department, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, P. O.
Box 442, St. Louis 66, Missouri.
Page 5

Signs o f a Business Turn?
O lJ T P U T of the nation’s mines and factories held
steady in February of this year and may have strength­
ened during March. In March the proportion of un­
employed in the civilian labor force remained near its
February level, the highest since October 1958. The
average factory workweek and the average weekly
earnings of employed workers were about unchanged
from January to February. Consumers stepped up
their outlays at retail establishments in February
and March.

Inventory Developments
Inventory developments in recent months are in
sharp contrast to those during the initial stages of the
current downturn. Inventory liquidation1 by manu­
facturers in the early months of the recession was
centered in inventories of purchased materials and of
goods in the process of production. More recently the
picture has been dominated by liquidation in inven­
tories of manufacturers’ finished goods and of goods
in the hands of retailers.
From January through June 1960 total inventories
were accumulated, but at a sharply declining rate.
These declines were especially clear in the durable
manufacturing sector as manufacturers sought to re1 Unless otherwise specified, changes in inventories and sales
have been corrected for seasonal influences.

1
Total Inventories of Manufacturers of Durable Goods
Seasonally Adjusted

P e r C e n t C h a n g e fr o m P r e v io u s M o n th

duce inventories and to pare down production to a
level more in line with their declining volume of
sales (see Chart 1). Liquidation of durable manu­
facturers’ inventories began in July of 1960 and was
especially heavy through October and November.
One of the means by which manufacturers can ad­
just their inventories is to cut back on purchases from
their suppliers. Accordingly, as Chart 2 indicates, in­
ventories of purchased materials were the first to show
the effects of manufacturers’ cutbacks. By June 1960
liquidation was under way in these stocks.
Inventories of goods in process of production re­
flect, with some lag, current levels of output and em­
ployment. Though there was modest liquidation of
these inventories in April (see chart), sharp and per­
sisting liquidation began in July, one month after the
onset of liquidation in purchased materials inventories.
Finished goods inventories continued to expand
through the first four months of the recession as pro­
duction persistently outran sales. At times, such a
situation may reflect a desire on the part of manufac­
turers to build up their inventories; this was apparent­
ly not the case from May to September I960.2 In Oc­
tober of 1960 manufacturers succeeded in bringing
production in line with the lower levels of sales. From
October 1960 through February of this year inven­
tories of finished durable goods declined (see Chart 2).
All liquidation by manufacturers in January occurred
in finished goods inventories. Inventory liquidation
in February centered in finished goods and in goods
in the process of production with largest cuts among
producers of automobiles. There was also extensive
inventory liquidation by retailers, especially by auto­
mobile dealers. Liquidation in manufacturers’ stocks
of finished goods and in retailers’ inventories indicates
that sales exceeded the prevailing rates of production
and supply.

New Orders and Sales
In February manufacturers of durable goods ex­
perienced their first expansion in new orders since
September 1960. Much of the expansion was attribut­
ed to Government defense contracts with the aircraft
and instruments industries. Sales of manufacturers’
durable goods edged 1 per cent above the January
level, the first expansion in this series since May 1960.
1960
Source: U. S. Department of Commerce.

Page 6




1961

2 Although there is no universally agreed-upon date for the
beginning of the most recent economic contraction, May 1960
was selected for this article.

pentories of Manufacturers of Durable Goods
by Stages of Fabrication
>nally Adjusted

e r C e n t C h a n g e fro m P r e v io u s M o n th

4

Purchased M aterials
3

After three successive months of decline, sales by
retailers advanced about 1 per cent from January’s
level, with much of the expansion concentrated in de­
partment and other general merchandise stores. Feb­
ruary sales of automobiles and durable goods gener­
ally were unchanged from January. Although auto­
mobile sales increased during March, the level of sales
for the month was below the average for this time of
year.
Department store sales in the Eighth Federal Re­
serve District, as in the nation, during the four weeks
ending March 26 were up substantially over the cor­
responding period of I960.3 However, part of this

2
1
0

Department Store Sales Index
Eighth District
1947-49=100

-1

,

1947-49=100

,

2
3

2
j ... j .

G o o d s in Process

1
0

gjfl L

-1
1
-2
4

year s increase in sales was attributable to the earlier
Easter season. Sales were abnormally low in the
same period of 1960 as a result of heavy snowstorms.
After adjusting for these factors the margin of im­
provement over a year earlier is somewhat diminished.
Sales in the major metropolitan areas of the district
have gained over last year, while sales in the smaller
cities have improved even more.

3

2

1

Industrial Production
The nations industrial output, after declining for
six consecutive months, was unchanged during Febru­
ary from January’s level. Decreases in materials pro­
duction, seasonally adjusted, were offset by small in­
creases in consumer goods output, notably in such
consumer durables as T.V., radio, and other household
appliances.

0
-1
-2
1960
U. S. Department of Commerce.




1961

3 The Weekly Department Store Sales Index is not adjusted for
seasonal influences.

Page 7

There was modest expansion in iron and steel out­
put during February and March despite continuing
weaknesses in the construction and automobile indus­
tries, important consumers of steel and steel products.
Such developments lend support to the hopes that
liquidation of steel inventories may be ending. There
was also some strengthening in production of business
equipment.

Construction
Expenditures on construction in February, seasonal­
ly adjusted, totaled $54.4 billion, down 1 per cent from
January. Most of the decline was in private residential
construction. Viewed more broadly, however, outlays
on construction have been quite stable through the
past year; the current level is only 1 per cent below
that which prevailed in February 1960.
4
O utlays for N e w Construction

Latest d a ta plotted: F eb ruary

Source: U. S. Department of Commerce.

Housing starts during February, seasonally adjust­
ed, were up 7 per cent over January. This is the
second straight month of advance in this series. Sea­
sonally adjusted applications for FHA commitments
were unchanged in February from January. February
VA appraisals of proposed new homes were up 27 per
cent from January and 15 per cent from February of
1960.

Unemployment and Incom e
The number of workers on the nation’s nonfarm
payrolls expanded more than seasonally in March,
following a sharp drop in February. Although unem­
ployment declined by 210,000 workers, the decline
was less than seasonal. Unemployment in March at
6.9 per cent of the civilian labor force after seasonal
adjustment was up only slightly from the level pre­
vailing from December through February but was
Page 8




substantially higher than the pre-recession low of 4.8
per cent in February 1960.
Layoffs during February were prominent among
workers in construction and in manufacturing, espe­
cially in the automobile industry. In the early weeks
of March, layoffs in these sectors slowed somewhat.
Although unemployment remained high among steel
workers (and in primary metals generally) there was
apparently no further worsening in this sector of the
economy.
The week ending March 18 marked the fourth suc­
cessive week of decline in the number of workers in
the nation receiving unemployment benefits. Part of
the decrease is attributable to seasonal forces; in
addition, a substantial number of workers have ex­
hausted their benefit rights. Despite these declines
the level of insured unemployment is near the record
high for this time of year. As a result of improved
weather conditions for outside employment and be­
cause of some slackening in layoffs in the automobile
industry, initial claims for unemployment compensa­
tion declined on balance over the three-week period
ending March 25. Though this series is highly erratic,
it appears that the pace of initial claims is currently
running somewhat behind that set during the cor­
responding period in the recession year of 1958.
During March, the labor markets of the major
metropolitan areas in the Eighth Federal Reserve Dis­
trict reflected a mixed pattern. There was some sea­
sonal pick-up in trade and construction activities in
all areas. The number receiving jobless benefits de­
creased moderately at Memphis and Little Rock, and
was 9 per cent under the previous month at Evansville.
However, uneven production schedules in the automo­
bile industry contributed to a continuing high level
of unemployment at St. Louis and Louisville. At all
the major labor markets insured unemployment re­
mained substantially higher than at this time of year
in 1959 or 1960.

Personal Incom e
Personal income in the nation, after taking account
of seasonal forces, declined slightly in February, the
fourth consecutive month of decline. During the
current economic contraction the decline in total per­
sonal income lagged behind other movements in the
economy, while the downturn in income from fac­
tories was more prompt. As shown in Chart 5 total
personal income expanded for five months following
the May 1960 peak. The decline in wages of pro­
duction workers coincided with the decline in in­
dustrial output. Transfer payments, which include
unemployment compensation and Social Security
benefits, expanded steadily during the period. Other
forms of income-including dividends, rents, interest,

i

5

7

Yields on U.S. Government Securities

Personal Income
Cumulative Changes Since M a y 1960

Per Cent
■ y

W eekly A verages of Daily Figures
r

i

1

— r

1

"| -v

i

Rer Cent

1 1

|

!

1

1 ,
1961

,

Long-Term Bonds
v

\

/ “ NV \

■ 1M

v

3-5 Y ear Bonds
I
\
\
a

/

V

'/

v

3-Month Treasury Bills

- Latest data plotted: W eek ; End in g M arch

i t
__ 1__ 1__ 1___1__ 1
__ i
1960

1960

1961

1 Includes farm and nonfarm proprietors’ income, dividends, rents, interest,
wage and salary disbursements in trade, service, and Government.
2 Wage and salary disbursements in manufacturing, construction, and in
other commodity producing industries.

and income of owners of farms and businesses—ex­
panded (in total) through the first six months from the
peak, but have declined slightly since November.

Financial Developments
Total member bank reserves, adjusted for seasonal
variation, expanded by about $200 million during Janu­
ary and February but declined slightly in March. The
expansion in reserves resulted largely from smaller
than usual net sales of securities in the open market
by the Federal Reserve. Member bank borrowing
from Reserve Banks averaged about $65 million in

Reserves of Member Banks*
Billions of Dollars

W e e k ly A v e r a g e s o f D a ily F igu re s S e a so n a lly A d ju ste d

Latest d a ta plotted: W e e k E n d in g M arc h 29, 1961

* Reserves of member banks adjusted for changes in the percentage
sometimes referred to as “effective” reserves.




31, 1961
i i i

,

,

■

March, down slightly from the level during December
of 1960. Excess reserves, which averaged roughly
$650 million in March, were also moderately below
the levels of late 1960.
Reflecting the strength in reserves, loans and in­
vestments of commercial banks, seasonally adjusted,
expanded by about $3 billion during the first two
months of 1961. Indications based on weekly report­
ing banks are that total bank credit rose less than usual
during March. Business loans at weekly reporting
banks expanded sharply during the first quarter of the
year. The money supply of the nation (demand de­
posits and currency) expanded by about $0.7 billion
during the first two and one-half months of the year.
In this same period time deposits expanded by $3
billion.
Yields on Treasury bills aver­
aged about 2.40 per cent during
March, down slightly from Feb­
Billions of Dollars
ruary, but above the 2.25 per
cent level around the turn of the
year. Interest rates on long-term
Government bonds continued to
edge downward in March. In an
advance refunding during late
March the Treasury exchanged
more than $6 billion of four
outstanding issues for two new
bonds due in 1966 and 1967. Two
purposes of the Treasury’s opera­
tion were to reduce the debt
management problems in 196263 and to lengthen the average
maturity of the debt. The Treas­
ury also sold $1.5 billion of AVz~
month tax anticipation bills dur­
of reserves required,
ing the last week in March.
Page 9

District Banking in Early 1961
JL OTAL commercial bank loans and investments as
well as deposits exhibited strength in the first two
months of 1961. Total credit outstanding, seasonally
adjusted, at Eighth District member banks rose about
2 per cent during January and February, while loans
and investments at commercial banks throughout the
nation increased at a slightly lower rate.
Loan volume, which usually declines during the
early months of the year, remained virtually un­
changed in the two months at member banks in the
Eighth District. Loans at commercial banks through­
out the nation declined, but much less than usual.
District banks reduced their investment holdings while
commercial banks in the nation increased their port­
folios on balance.
Total deposits seasonally adjusted, reflecting the
changes in loans and investments, rose during the first
two months of the year. The money supply of the
nation (which consists of demand deposits plus cur­
rency) grew at an annual rate of 3.6 per cent from
December through February. Demand deposits at
district member banks, seasonally adjusted, increased
at about twice the rate at which the nation’s money
supply grew. Time deposits at district banks, as in
the nation, increased sharply.
The ratio of loans to deposits for district member
banks changed only slightly in the first two months of
1961, remaining at a level just under 50 per cent. At
the end of May last year, the loan to deposit ratio
reached a peak of 51.4 per cent. By comparison, loans
averaged about 45 per cent of deposits in the year
1957 and less than 40 per cent in 1953.

ing the first twelve weeks of 1961 (through March 22).
Time deposits rose $39 million, and demand deposits
contracted $93 million. Adjusted for seasonal influ­
ences, total deposits rose about 2 per cent during
early 1961.
Reflecting in part the deposit experience, total credit
at the St. Louis weekly reporting banks, after seasonal
adjustment, increased about 1.5 per cent during the
first twelve weeks of 1961. Loans, which normally
decline at this time, rose slightly ($2.0 million). A
substantial drop in loans in financial institutions failed
to offset rises in advances to consumers and to bus­
inesses, primarily textile, apparel and leather manu­
facturers, contractors, and wholesale firms. On the
other hand, these banks sold on balance $6 million of
their security holdings in the period.
Louisville—From the end of December through the
third week in March, total deposits at Louisville
weekly reporting banks, seasonally adjusted, showed
little net change, a sharp rise in February being off­
set by decreases in January and early March. De­
mand deposits declined $79 million. Time deposits
rose only slightly, contrary to the pattern of large in­
creases in these accounts at banks in most other cities
of the nation.
Changes in Total Deposits
W e e k ly R ep orting Ban ks in District C itie s
P e rC e n t

S e a s o n a l ly A d j u s t e d

P e rC e n t

From the end of February to March 22, bank credit
at district member banks was virtually unchanged on
a seasonally adjusted basis, according to data received
from weekly reporting banks in leading cities. How­
ever, it appears that total deposits declined slightly, a
rise in time deposits being more than offset by a de­
cline in demand balances.
Banking conditions varied in the different parts of
the district in the early months of 1961. A brief review
of developments in the major cities in the district
points up some of these differences.
St. Louis—Total deposits at weekly reporting banks
in the city of St. Louis showed modest strength dur­
Page 10




E V A N S V IL L E

ST. L O U IS

MEMPHIS

Total loans and investments at Louisville banks con­
tracted about seasonally in early 1961. Total loans
declined slightly less than they usually do at this
time of year, with the most notable contraction in
outstanding advances to consumers. Investment port­
folios were reduced about $9 million.
Memphis—Total deposits at Memphis banks, sea­
sonally adjusted, rose about 5 per cent from the end
of last year through March 22, 1961. Demand bal­
ances of state and local governments and certified and
officers’ checks rose, and other demand balances de­
clined less than usual in the first twelve weeks of the
year. Time deposits increased 8 per cent.
Total credit outstanding at Memphis banks con­
tracted much less than usual during early 1961. Loans
contracted $14 million, which was less than usual at
this time because of increases in consumer loans .re­
flecting a sizable purchase of consumer receivables.
Memphis banks reduced their holdings of investments
$6 million in the twelve weeks under review.
Little Rock—Banks in Little Rock gained deposits
in the first twelve weeks of 1961. Total deposits rose
$6 million, compared with declines of $9 million and
$16 million during the corresponding periods of 1960
and 1959, respectively. Demand deposits increased
$5 million and time and saving accounts rose $1 mil­
lion.
Total credit contracted $2.6 million at Little Rock
banks in the same period. Both loans and securities
declined slightly. Total credit at these banks decreased

$3 million during the corresponding weeks of both
1960 and 1959. A contraseasonal rise in agricultural
loans this year partially offset seasonal declines in
other types of loans.
Evansville—Total deposits at weekly reporting banks
in Evansville increased about $2 million from the end
of 1960 to March 22, 1961. This compares with de­
clines of about $12 million during the corresponding
period of 1960 and of $17 million in the like weeks of
1959. Demand deposits declined moderately, but
the decrease was more than offset by a rise in time de­
posits.
Evansville banks expanded the total amount of
credit outstanding by $6 million during the first twelve
weeks of the year. By comparison, bank credit was
virtually unchanged during the corresponding weeks
of 1960 and declined $5 million during 1959. The
increase in early 1961 resulted from net purchases of
securities, primarily short-term Government issues.
Loans were virtually unchanged during the period.
Other District Member Banks—Total deposits, sea­
sonally adjusted, at member banks in the smaller
cities and rural areas of the district rose from the
end of 1960 through the middle of March 1961. Time
deposits increased $31 million, and evidence suggests
that demand deposits declined less than seasonally.
Credit outstanding, when adjusted for seasonal
variation, increased somewhat. Loans rose, but hold­
ings of securities, primarily Government obligations,
were reduced.

Changes in Total Loans

Changes in Total Investments

W e e k ly R ep orting B a n k s in District Cities

W e e k ly Reporting Banks in D istrict C itie s

Per Cent

S e a s o n a lly A d ju ste d

Per Cent

Per Cent

Per Cent
Decem ber 1960 - M a rc h 22, 1961

E V A N S V IL L E




LITTLE
ROCK

L O U IS V IL L E

M E M P H IS

ST. L O U IS

E V A N S V IL L E

LITTLE

L O U IS V IL L E

M E M P H IS

ST. L O U IS

ROCK

Page 11

B,

The Stock Market in Recent Months

BEGINNING IN OCTOBER 1960 and continuing
into March this year, the stock market experienced a
marked rise of prices. Daily average prices during
the month of March 1961, as measured by the Stand­
ard and Poors 500 stock index, were 19 per cent high­
er than in October last year. Furthermore, security
pices were 7 per cent above prices prevailing in the
previous peak month of July 1959 (see Chart I). The

stock prices reached their peak.
Dividends as a per cent of stock prices have also
declined in recent months. At cash dividend rates
existing last October the average annual yield on
shares in the Standard and Poor s 500 stock index was
roughly 3.60 per cent (see Chart II). By March of
this year, the ratio of dividends to prices had fallen
below the 3.11 per cent average of July 1959, the

Stock Prices*
1941-43=10

M onthly A v e ra g e s of D a ily Figures

Stock Yields and Interest Rates
1941-43=10

Per Cent

v~

Per Cent

Monthly Averages of Dolly Figures

12

A

Ear

12

>rice R<atio

\
Dividends ^Price Ratio

V

V

High est Grcide Co rporati» Bondi5

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

I960

1961

Latest data plotted; March estimated

daily volume of transactions also increased substan­
tially, from an average of 2.6 million shares in Octo­
ber last year to 5.4 million shares this March.
The boost in stock prices in the past few months oc­
curred in spite of a downward trend of corporate
profits since the first quarter of 1960. Corporate
profits fell 17 per cent, seasonally adjusted, from the
first three months of 1960 to the fourth quarter of
the year. Moreover, in the first quarter of this year
corporate profits were probably somewhat below the
fourth quarter last year.
In comparison with past periods, corporate stock
prices are now high in relation both to corporate earn­
ings and to dividends paid. In the first quarter of
1961 earnings probably averaged below 5 per cent of
stock prices. This is in contrast to an average of
about 5.9 per cent in 1959 and 1960 (see Chart II).
From 1955 to 1957 corporate earnings averaged near­
ly 7.7 per cent of security prices. Although stock mar­
ket data for the decade of the 1920’s are not exactly
comparable to those of today, the average eamingsprice ratio in the first six months of 1929 was about
5.5 per cent. The ratio probably fell slightly below
5 per cent in September of that year, the month when
Page 12




previous postwar trough. On the other hand, the
average yield on corporate shares in the three years
ending with 1957 was 4.17 per cent. During the first
half of 1929 it averaged 3.36 per cent.
The recent rise in stock prices took place in the face
of a decline in industrial activity. It is not unusual,
however, for stock prices to rise during a business
contraction, in anticipation of recovery. In the 19571958 recession the Standard and Poors index began
to move upwards from December 1957, and had in­
creased 5 per cent through April 1958, the trough
of industrial activity. Similarly, during the 1953-1994
downturn industrial production reached a low in
March 1954, while stock prices had already climbed
more than 11 per cent during the six preceding months.
An appreciation in prices of corporate stocks, simi­
lar to those which occurred in the later stages of the
two previous business recessions, may give a positive
stimulus to economic activity. The advance in value
of equity shares probably tends to increase stock­
holders’ feeling of wealth and liquidity. As owners
of stocks which have risen in value begin to feel more
wealthy, they may tend to augment their purchases of
goods and services. To the extent that they increase
their spending, stockholders help to moderate a de­
cline in business activity and add strength to any
tendency toward economic recovery. Thus, the re­
cent rise in prices in the stock market may contribute
to an increase in total demand and economic recovery.