Full text of Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas) : March 1959
The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BUSINESS REVIEW MARCH 1959 Vol. 44, No.3 GROWTH IN SOUTHWESTERN BANKING Developments in Eleventh District banking conditions during 1958 reflected the impact of a central banking policy of monetary and credit ease, as well as the generally favorable business conditions that prevailed in the Southwest. To a large extent, the nationwide 1957-58 recession was concentrated in the durable goods industries, and its effect upon the southwestern economy was comparatively mild. Although the petroleum industry underwent severe adjustment, which also affected the industry'S suppliers, agricultural and construction activities were at record levels. Consequently, District loan demand held up well throughout the recession. Contractive influences on bank assets and deposits, which developed in other sections of the country as a result of substantial loan liquidation, were not as noticeable in the Southwest's banking picture. Monetary and credit ease, while initiated in the latter part of 1957, was continued with force throughout the first half of 1958. Subsequently, from August to December, the policy of ease was moderated. As a result of three reductions in discount rates and in reserve requirements, together with System purchases of Government securities during the first 6 months of the year, pressures on bank reserve positions were removed, and reserve funds were provided to support expansion of bank credit. The shift in credit policy from restraint to ease was designed to promote monetary growth and to cushion the impact of economic recession. The influence of the System's easing actions was immediately reflected FEDE AL RESERVE DALLAS , BANK TeXAS OF DALLAS This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org) in a progressive easing of the reserve positions of member banks in the Eleventh District and, also, in the rapid growth of loans and investments which accompanied the elimination of reserve pressures. Bank asset and deposit expansion in the District paralleled the national trend, but the lesser impact of the 1957-58 recession on southwestern business and industry is indicated by the more rapid growth of banking aggregates in the Eleventh District. Loans and investments at the District's member banks advanced 12 percent in 1958, compared with a gain of slightly less than 9 percent for all commercial banks in the country. Similarly, total deposits at the District banks rose 10 percent during the year, while the gain at all commercial banks in the Nation was 6 percent. Loan Demand Loan demand in the Southwest was active throughout 1958. Although the volume of loan applications probably declined moderately from the peak levels reached in 1956 and 1957, totalloans at member banks in the District rose consistently throughout the year. Continued loan growth in the face of a slight moderation in loan demand reflected a shift from the more selective lending operations adopted during the previous years of credit restraint. Loan expansion was particularly sharp during the final quarter of 1958, when the extraseasonal increase exceeded the combined gains in the preceding 9 months. Gross loans of District member banks rose $463 million, or 11 percent. This gain, the largest since 1955, compares with an increase of only $151 million during 1957. Business loans were especially strong during the year, accounting for one-half of the total loan increase. Virtually all of this growth was concentrated at weekly reporting member banks in leading cities, where nearly all types of businesses expanded their borrowings. Of the various classes of business loans, petroleum loans showed the largest gain. Growth in these loans accelerated after midyear as petroleum production rose to higher levels, refinery runs increased, and drilling activity improved. Increased lending to construction companies also buoyed business loan accounts. This expansion, which occurred mostly in the last half of the year, reflected the record level of building activity. Other groups of business borrowers whose use of credit rose significantly were commodity dealers, sales finance companies, and trade establishments. I~ USINESS REVIEW In contrast with 1957, when District banks increased their real-estate loans by only a small amount, 1958 witnessed a gain of $50 million , or almost 13 percent. This gain was influenced not only by the sustained demand for real-estate loans but also by the development of easier reserve positions and the rapid advance in time deposits. As reserve positions tightened and time deposits began to decline in the final quarter of the year, real-estate loans also declined. Agricultural loans at the District's member banks also rose substantially, the 1958 gain being $96 million. This 29-percent rise contrasted with a 2-percent advance in 1957. Most of the 1958 increase was in the form of larger holdings of Commodity Credit Corporation certificates of interest. In addition to the influence of bumper crops during the year, the expansion in holdings of CCC certificates of interest also reflected the willingness of banks to add these instruments to their loan accounts as a secondary reserve. Member banks in the District during 1958 increased their loans to securities brokers and dealers by $23 million and added $25 million in loans to others for purchasing and carrying securities. The combined increase of $48 million compares with a $3 million decline in 1957. Of all the major loan categories, only loans to individuals showed smaller growth in 1958 than in the preceding year. Primarily as a result of reduced consumer purchases of durable goods, consumer loans expanded only $23 million, or less than one-third of the 1957 gain. Investments Investment holdings at member banks in the District rose steadily throughout 1958, with the annual increase amounting to $445 million . This increase of 14 percent represented the largest gain since 1945 and, to a large extent, reflected bank utilization of proceeds from the deposit expansion promoted by reductions in reserve requirements and System open market operations in the first half of 1958 . The process of investment expansion was facilitated during the year by intermittent Treasury offerings of obligations' having maturities attractive to commercial banks. Reflecting their comfortable reserve positions during most of the year, banks were relatively heavy subscribers to Treasury offerings for which payment by credit to Tax and Loan Accounts was allowed. In expanding their investment accounts, the member banks placed emphasis upon securities in the interme- MEMBER BANK LOANS AND INVESTMENTS ELEVENTH FEDERAL RES ERVE DISTRICT BI LLI ONS OF DOLLA RS ILal' Wld nlldayln lochman lh) 8 1LLI ONS OF DO LLA RS 5.0 5.0 4 . 51--------\--------~ 4.0'~;;:::::;;;;;;;;;;~-~r_------i 3.51-- - - - - - - \ - - - - - - - : : ;/Iii;;.;7 INVESTMENTS 2 . 5\.---~17.95;-::' 7 ---.L------,,9a.5'Oe- - - . . ' 2.5 diate- and long-term ranges. Thus, the largest gains Were recorded in holdings of Government bonds. Holdings of TreasQry notes and certificates of indebtedness also rose, but Treasury bill holdings declined moderately. Of the total increase in holdings of Government securities, almost two-thirds represented obligations haVing maturities of beyond 5 years. Depos its Influenced mainly by a national credit policy of ease during the first half of 1958 and by improving business conditions in the second half of the year, deposits at member banks in the District advanced steadily. The DEMAND AND TIM E DEPO SITS MEMBER BANKS- ELEVENTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT spread between the 1957 and 1958 monthly averages of deposits gradually widened as the year progressed. By November, deposits were averaging more than 10 percent above the comparable averages in 1957. The annual increase in deposits, also 10 percent, represented the largest gain since 1945. Demand balances expanded $542 million, or 7 percent, during the year, while time deposits increased $417 million. In terms of relative growth, however, the 25-percent rise in time deposits was considerably larger than the percentage growth in demand accounts. Time deposit growth was concentrated in the first half of the year, when rates on short-term investments were at cyclical lows. Later, as market rates firmed, time deposit gains at the larger banks in the District slowed and eventually began a downward movement which extended throughout the fourth quarter of the year. Earnings and Expenses Interest income on both loans and investments at member banks in the District rose to higher levels in 1958 . Interest and dividends on investments increased 6 percent as larger investment holdings more than offset a decline in the average rate of return, and interest and discounts on loans increased 8 percent. These gains - coupled with larger current earnings from service charges, trust operations, and other sources - produced an 8-percent advance in current operating earnings to a level of $377 million. The 1958 increase in current operating earnings was accompanied by a general expansion in operating expenses, which rose 11 percent during the year. The expansion in operating expenses was heavily weighted by a 31 -percent advance in the amount of interest paid on time deposits. Except for the cost of interest on borrowed funds, all categories of operating expenses also showed gains in 1958. Expenses for officers' salaries rose 7 percent, and expenses of employees' wages and salaries increased 4 percent. Notwithstanding the higher percentage growth of expenses, the larger absolute increase in current earnings - together with recoveries on loans, profits from securities transactions, and other sources - resulted in a 13-percent rise in bank profits. For the entire year, net profits after income taxes amounted to $76 million, of which 45 percent was paid out in cash dividends. C. PEACOCK Financial Economist L ESLIE B USi NESS RE Vi E~1 PETROLEUM - A YEAR OF ADJUSTMENT The petroleum industry and its related suppliers underwent a major readjustment during 1958, as a complex of internal and international forces converged to hold total demand at about the year-earlier level and to reduce domestic oil operations. Early in the year, the heavy accumulation of inventories, originating from the slow adjustment of crude oil production after the termination of the Suez crisis, merged with the curtailed demand stemming from the economic recession and a high level of imports to cause a sharp cutback in crude oil production. For nearly 6 months, domestic production was steadily lowered so that current demand was being met, in part, by inventory liquidation. Prices of crude oil and refined products were under heavy pressure, and although there was no major break in the basic crude price, some downward movement occurred. Under these conditions, drilling activity slowed markedly, and refinery runs also were reduced. By midsummer, the corrective actions of the industry had been sufficiently effective to allow a small improvement in production and refining. Gains in demand for refined products slowly strengthened with the broadly based industrial recovery; although imports of refined products rose sharply, the over-all improvement still left room for moderate expansion in domestic operations. In the final quarter of the year, an extraseasonal rise in demand for home heating oil, caused by severely cold weather, and further gains in industrial production reinforced the improvements in the petroleum industry and encouraged a large increase in drilling activity. Year-end demand, production, and refining were above the late-1957 levels, while stocks were markedly lower. The oil-producing states in the Eleventh District experienced the sharpest impact of the petroleum industry's adjustment and again demonstrated their strategic position as the balance wheel for the entire industry. Total District drilling activity fell to a level of 21,359 well completions, or 14 percent under 1957, compared with a national decline of 9 percent. Wildcat completions were down 24 percent in the District, while development drilling declined only 11 percent. Oil well completions decreased at a much faster rate than gas well completions in both the District and the Nation. The wildcat success ratio for the District dropped to 19 percent from 22 percent in 1957. Drilling activity was centered in the west Texas and Four Corners areas of the District states, but offshore drilling was curtailed I:USINESS REVIEW sharply. Drilling might have been reduced further if some leases had not been near expiration dates, thereby encouraging activity merely to hold the leases. ' The impact of this decline in drilling activity was reflected in the sales of industrial suppliers to the oil industry. Drilling rigs, cement, drilling muds, drill pipe, and many other products were in reduced demand. Similarly, most of the service firms, exploration concerns, and geophysical companies found domestic business sharply curtailed. These declines were reflected, in turn, to many small subcontractors. In addition, the lower level of drilling activity reduced lease payments and lessened the potential rise in royalty and production payments. It is estimated that proved recoverable reserves of crude oil in the District states increased less than 200 million barrels in 1958, and such reserves in Texas fell almost 375 million barrels. Proved reserves of crude oil rose in Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Louisiana, with this State gaining 396 million barrels. Thus, Texas crude oil reserves declined, while Louisiana reserves more than made up the loss and supplied the main impetus to the slight gains in both District and national reserves. Domestic production adjustments were also handled principally in the District, where crude oil output was down to an average of 2,937,000 barrels per day, or 12 percent below 1957 - contrasted with a nationwide decline of 7 percent. Early in the year, when production comparisons were measured against the record TOTAL CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION REST OF UNITED STATES PERCENTAGE CHANGE, 1958 FROM 19&1 SOURC[:Th. all and Gal Journol. levels of early 1957, year-to-year decreases in District production were as high as 28 percent; but by September and for the remainder of the year, there was a slight margin of gain over 1957. Among the District states, crude oil output showed declines ranging from 5 to 12 percent in Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas; New Mexico production increased moderately. Other than an 8-pe17cent loss in California production, crude oil output in the rest of the United States rose during 1958. The number of producing days in Texas was cut back to 122 in 1958, reflecting a decline for the third consecutive year and contrasting with a total of 171 in 1957 and 276 in 1951. During April, May, and June, Texas producing days were reduced to 8, a record low, but by December, allowables were scheduled on a 12day basis. CRUDE OIL AND REFINED PRODUCTS IMPORTS UNITED STATES MILLION S OF BARRELS (DAILY AVERAGE) MILLION S OF BARRELS 1.4 1.4 SOURCE Sr U. 5 . 01l'IOU 01 Min ... Crude oil imports during 1958 averaged 953,000 barrels per day, or 44,000 barrels daily lower than in 1957. However, in the latter part of the year, such imports exceeded the level set for the voluntary imports quotas, and total crude oil imports for 1958 accounted for a rising slulre of the domestic market. Throughout the year, the voluntary imports quota arrangement was Under criticism from groups that wanted more stringent Controls and companies which were dissatisfied with their quotas. For some time, the authorities have been trying to work out a satisfactory plan to curtail imports, but no announcement has been made of either the main features of the plan or its date of implementation. Crude runs to refinery stills in the District, averaging 2,133,000 barrels per day, were 6 percent under 1957; CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION AND REFINING ELEVENTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT MILLIONS OF BARRELS I DAILY AVERAGE) MIl.LIONS OF' BARRELS 4,0 4 ,0 I,5L.--- - - - ;1"'95"" 7 - - - l . . . - - - - - - .19a.iS:.-S--~ 1.5 SOURCES rU,S. Burtou 0' Min .. , Amt,lcanPtlrollum In.llluli. Amlrlcon Pllror,urn In ellluli. in the Nation, crude runs were down 4 percent. Refinery activity approximated the pattern for production, with a large year-to-year margin of decline early in 1958 being followed by a steady narrowing until October, when a gain was registered. Although new refinery construction was lower th an in 1957, there were a number of modernizations and expansions at District refineries in 1958. Many of these capital expenditure programs were developed to increase facilities for producing raw stock materials for the chemical industry. Moreover, some of the larger oil companies with subsidiary chemical concerns made substantial investments in new chemical plants and equipment. Augmenting the domestic supply, imports of refined products rose from 548 ,000 barrels per day in 1957 to 724,000 barrels daily in 1958. An especially strong increase in such imports occurred in the final quarter of the year, when average imports were 38 percent above the closing 3 months of 1957. Total imports of crude oil and refined products averaged nearly 9 percent above the 1957 level, while domestic crude oil production was cut back 7 percent and refinery activity was reduced 4 percent. The major factor which enabled the industry to reduce inventories in the first half of the year and then expand production in the final 6 months was the continued high level of demand . Total demand for the four major refined products averaged 7,352,000 barrels per day in 1958, representing an increase of 64,000 barrels daily over 1957. Among the different types of products, kerosene and distillate demands were BUSINESS REVIE~1 strongest, followed by gasoline demand. Only residual fuel oil requirements were lower than in 1957. Demand for gasoline was fairly well sustained throughout the year; however, demand for each of the other major refined products was uneven, with residual fuel oil demand down sharply in early 1958 but up strongly in the last half of the year. As a consequence, total demand for the four products was slightly below the comparable 1957 level through August but then spurted ahead. With total supply curtailed and demand up slightly, stocks of crude oil and refined products were sharply reduced. Crude oil stocks started the year with a margin of about 28 million barrels over early 1957 but ended the year 19 million barrels below the December 1957 level. Similarly, total stocks of the four major refined products were cut back severely and at the year end were 36 million barrels less than at the same time in 1957. Among the major products stocks, distillate fuel oil and gasoline were substantially under the yearearlier levels, kerosene stocks were down slightly, and residual fuel oil stocks were still somewhat above a year ago. In addition to the problems of a slower gain in demand, rising imports, and reduced production, the industry faced a rash of price cuts on crude oil and refined products. Both early and late in the year, crude oil prices were under heavy pressure, and the downward moves offset most of the general crude price rise of early 1957. However, the price reductions were selective, and west Texas sour crude showed some of the sharpest cuts. Throughout the spring and summer, gasoline price DEMAND FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS UNITED STATES I DAILY AVE RAGE) MILL I ON S OF BAR REL S MI l.LIONS OF BAR REL S 9.5 9.5 " 9.0 8. 5 8 .0 7. 5 ~ \~ 9.0 \lt 19 S8 ~'~~ .~ 7. 0 v., -1---- -',' ~ I _~ ~ 6 .5 6.0J F M A M SOUR CES l Am . rl ca n Pltrollum Ini litut e. U, S, Bur.a u of Min,., BUSINESS REVIEW 6 ~~ ," -, A 1'<- 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 19 57 SON 6 .5 06 . 0 PETROLEUM STOCKS UNITED STATES MILLI ON S OF BA RR ELS MILLI ONS OF BARRE LS 500 500 3001 - - - -- - --/-- - - - - - -- 1 300 2501==-- -- - --/-- - -- ...................."""""~ 2001".---- - --:1-=-= 9S=7- - - L - -- ----:-I:::: SS78 - - - . . . . ' 200 'S*OUR -Oalollnl, k.ro"nl,d lltlllat.,ond , .. Iduol . CES I Am, r lcon Petr ol,um Inl tltut • . u.s. Bur.au of Min... wars were particularly noticeable. Furthermore, there was increased market competition. By early 1959, the petroleum industry was in a substantially improved position from a year ago. Stocks of refined products were in good balance, and crude oil stocks did not appear to be excessive, especially in view of the strong demand for fuel oil stemming from severely cold weather. In addition, with industrial production continuing upward, residual fuel oil demand has strengthened. Perhaps more importantly, the regulatory agencies have exercised restraint in advancing allowables. Despite the improvements, the petroleum industry faces a number of important problems in early 1959. Imports have continued upward, especially refined products. With crude production much above last summer's level, crude oil stocks accumulated markedly during the past 6 months and, unless watched carefully, could become burdensome. Moreover, gasoline inventories have been accumulating at a more than seasonal pace as refiners attempt to keep ahead of the exceptionally strong demand for heating oil. Wages at most major refineries have been increased 5 percent; however, in early February, at least one refinery was strikebound, causing a sharp curtailment in demand for certain District crude. The current year also opened Witll a new round of crude price cuts, and although prices of some refined products were raised slightly, gasoline price wars have erupted again. Nevertheless, with a prospective increase of 4 to 5 percent in demand in 1959, the industry is moderately optimistic. BUSINESS REVIEW BUSINESS, AGRICULTURAL, AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS During January, substantial gains in durable goods sales and continuing strength in soft goods sales caused a year-toyear increase of 8 percent in Eleventh District department store sales. Data for individual metropolitan areas indicate that the improvement in sales was uniform throughout the District. Total new car registrations in th,e District's four largest metropolitan areas during January were above both the year-earlier and the month-earlier levels. Improved moisture conditions boosted agricultural prospeats over a wide section of the District, although rain is needed in western areas. Output of winter vegetables for fresh market may be onethird below that of last year. Livestock remain in fairly good condition, and forage supplies are increasing seasonally. The numbers of all cattle and calves, stock sheep, hogs, chickens, and turkeys as of January 1 were larger than a year ago. In response to seasonal influences, nonfarm employment in the District states declined, and Texas unemployment rose during January. Industrial pro- duction in Texas was seasonally constant in January, as strong gains throughout most industries offset weakness in crude oil production and layoffs at aircraft plants. Construction contracts awarded in the District states during 1958 reached a record value and were 15 percent higher than in 1957. In December, contracts reflected a year-to-year decline, caused by a sharply reduced volume of nonresidential awards. Refinery operations continued at a high level in January and early February to satisfy the rising demand for petroleum products. Substantial imports of refined products added to supply. Crude oil prices drifted lower in the western portion of the Eleventh District. Business loans and consumer loans showed increased strength in the 4 weeks ended February 18, but other types of loans continued to decline. The District's weekly reporting member banks gained time deposits during the 4-week period, but demand balances decreased modestly. Reserve positions of reserve city banks in the District tightened in January, but free reserves of country banks rose. Despite the rather poor shopping weather, Eleventh District department store trade during January maintained its extraseasonal strength and featured a continued gain in durable goods sales. AnnouncelUents of new store openings and projected construction Were quite noticeable during both January and early February. New department stores are to be opened in AUstin, Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston, with expansions of existing stores in these same cities and many others throughout the District. 1947-49 average, compared with 160 in December and 155 in January a year ago. In early February, sales continued above the 1958 pace, and for the first 6 weeks of 1959, cumulative sales were 9 percent above the declining sales volume in the comparable period last year. Date Unadiusted Seasonally odjusted Department store sales in the District during J anUary declined less than seasonally from December and Were 8 percent above sales in January 1958. The seaSonally adjusted sales index rose to 168 percent of the 1958: Janua ry .. . ... November... . . Dece mber. . . . . 1959: January.. ... . . 123r 190 277 133 155r 166 160 168 INDEXES OF DEPARTMENT STORE SALES AND STOCKS Eleventh Federal Reserve District (1947·49 = 100) SALES (Dail y av erag e) r p - STOCKS (End of month) Unadjusted 148r 190 152 147p Seasonally adlusted 169r 172 163 167p Rev ised . Preliminary. BUSINESS REVIE; I SALES AT FURN ITURE STORES AND HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE STORES (Pe rcentaGo chan go in retail valu e ) January 1959 from line of trad e by area De ce mb e r January 1958 1958 -35 2 - 22 -27 -32 54 - 55 -40 8 -40 - 3 29 15 15 -20 36 - 11 3 21 - 6 -35 -37 17 18 FURNITURE STORES Total Ele ve nth District . • • . . • . . • . . . • • • . . . • • • . . Amarillo . . • • . . . . . . . • . . . . . • • . • • . . . . • • • • . . . . Austin . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . • • . • • • • • • • • • . . Dalla s ••• .• .... •.•. • ... ..• •• " . . • ••• . . . . • • Houston . . . • . . . . . . . • • • • . . . . . . . • • . . . . • • . . . . Lubbock. • • . • . . • . . • • • • • • • . . . . . • • • • . . . . • • . • San Antonio .. . . . . •. . • . ••• . . • . . . ••. • . • . . • .• Shreve port, Lo . . • • • . . • • • • . . . . . • • • • • . . . • • • . . Wichito Foils .. .. .. ... . . ... .. ............. . Othe r cities. • • • . . . . • • . . . . . . . • • . . . . • • . • . . • • HOUSEHOLD APP LI ANCE STORES Total Ele venth District. . • • . • . . • • • . • • . • • • • . . • • Dalla s... . . . . . . . . • •. • • .. .• . . . • •• . • . . • • . . •. DEPARTMENT STORE SA LES AN D STOCKS (Pe rcentag e chang e i n reta i l valu e ) NET SALES January Decemb er Area 1958 Tota l Eleventh District . • • • • ...• Corpus Christi •••••..•.... •• . . Da llas • • • .• .. .. ... .• . •... . •• EI Paso .... . . . . . . ........ .. . Fort Worth .. . . . ......... .. .. -52 - 59 -5 1 -51 - 56 -52 -47 -49 - 55 -54 Houston •• •••••• •••• •• ••• ••• San Antonio •• ••• .• . • . • • •...• Shre veport, la •• ••• . . •••• . • •• Waco ••••• • ••••••• • ••• • • ••• Other citi es ••• • • •••••••••• • • STOCKS (End of month) 1959 from Januar y 1959 from January December 1958 1958 1958 8 7 6 9 6 9 11 8 7 8 -3 -5 0 1 -5 -5 -5 9 -6 -5 -1 -2 0 3 -5 -3 0 3 -5 1 January Incomplete data on sales in the various departments indicate that sales of durable goods contributed substantially to over-all sales strength in January. According to these preliminary reports, there were year-toyear gains of 3 percent and 19 percent, respectively, in sales of major household appliances and radios, phonographs, and television sets; and the total for all homefurnishings lines was up 6 percent. In addition, sales of soft goods continued to show favorable year-to-year comparisons, with sales of women's and misses' coats, suits, and dresses up 11 percent and sales of men's clothing up 9 percent. the District. Year-to-year comparisons in the individual areas varied over a wide range. In San Antonio, registrations during January rose 43 percent over a year ago, while Fort Worth and Dallas registrations gained 13 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The Houston ar.ea, with a 2-percent decline, was the only one of the four showing a decrease from January last year. Moisture conditions were sharply improved over a wide portion of the District during February as a result of rain, sleet, and snow. The heaviest precipitation was received from the Low Rolling Plains and the Edwards Plateau region of Texas eastward into Louisiana. In some early sections, such as the Lower Valley and Coastal Bend of Texas, wet soils are delaying seeding of crops. Surface moisture supplies remain in adequat~ in northwestern wheat areas, and general ra ins would be extremely helpful. In these same areas, several days of warmer weather have encouraged development of roots and top growth of wheat. Just a few days of mild weather will provide lush pasturage in irrigated sections. From the Blacklands eastward, small grains have responded quickly to improved moisture cond itions, and prospects are more encouraging than a few weeks earlier. HA RVESTED ACREA GE OF PRI NC IPAL CR OPS Five Sou thwes tern Sta tes ( In thousand s of acros ) Averag e Area 1958 1957 1956 1947-56 Arizona ••• • • • •• . • •• louisiana .• • . • • . . . • . New Me xico ••••• . .. • Oklahoma •• • . .• •••• Te xa s •• .... .. .. • .. . 1,220 2,422 1, 12 1 9,289 24,299 1, 132 2,529 1,064 8,680 23,787 1,138 2,685 1,116 9,400 21,376 1. 103 3,062 1,432 11 ,086 25,380 Tota l.. .. . .... . ... 38,35 1 37, 192 35,715 42,063 SO URCE , Uni ted States Departm ent of Agriculture . Inventories on hand at the District's department stores at the end of January remained 1 percent below the year-earlier level and were 3 percent lower than at the end of December. From incomplete data, it appears that orders outstanding, bolstered by a more than seasonal increase in new orders placed during the month, were up about 10 percent from a year ago, continuing the rise which began last fall. In most commercial vegetable areas, progress has been slow as a result of wet weather, particularly in south Texas. Field work has been interrupted, and the cool, damp weather has been generally unfavorable for most crops. Some south Texas onion growers are having difficulty in curing onions for shipping. Production of winter vegetables in Texas for fresh market is estimated, as of February 1, to be 32 percent below last year and 30 percent below the 1949-57 average. New car registrations in January were 3 percent greater than in December and 9 percent higher than in January 1958 in the four largest metropolitan areas in Livestock are in good condition and, in most sections, have come thFough the winter with very little loss of weight. As of February 1, range feed conditions I :USINESS REVIEW COND ITION STATIST ICS OF WEEKLY REPORT ING MEMBER BANKS IN LEAD ING CITIES LIVESTOCK ON FARMS AND RANCHES, JANUARY 1 Texas, Five Southwestern States, and Uni te d States Eleventh Federal Reserve District (In thou sa nds) ( In thousands of dollars)' ---- Five southwestern sto tes t Texas Cattl .. . ........ Milk cattle .... Beef cattle . . .• Shoep .......... Stock sheep . . . Feeders . ..•.. Hogs .... . .. .. .. Horses and mules. Chickens' • . • .. .. Turk.ys .... ..... 1 United States 1959 1958 1959 1958 1959 8,510 1,108 7,402 5,355 5,170 185 1,226 232 17,196 SIS 7,736 1,177 6,559 4,891 4,700 191 908 242 15,050 397 15,764 2,352 13,4 12 7,465 7,159 306 2, 132 527 27,567 648 14,576 2,456 12,120 6,89 1 6,59 1 300 1,705 557 24,995 539 96,851 32,826 64,025 32,644 28,364 4,280 57,201 3,079 383,257 5,861 93,350 33,413 59,937 31,337 27,327 4,0 10 50,980 3,354 370,884 5,542 Arizona , Loui siana , New Mexico, O klahoma, and Texas. 2 Does not includ e commercial broilers . SOURCE , Unit. d Stat.s D.partme nt of Agricult ure. ASSETS Commercial and industria l loans•. . . . ..... .•.• Agricultural loans • •. ••.•.•. .. . ••.•.. .. . . ..• loans to brokers and dealers in securities . . . ... Ot her loan s for purcha sing or carrying securities. Real- estat e loans • . . .. .. . ••. . .....•••.•. . . . Loans to banks• . •. . •.•••.•...•••••.. .• .• •. All oth.r loans . .. . . .... •...•... ... .•••••.. The number of all cattle and calves on farms and ranches in the District states as of January 1, 1959, totaled 15,764,000, or 8 percent more than on the same date a year earlier. An II-percent increase in the number of beef cattle more than offset a 4-percent decline in milk cattle numbers. In the Nation, cattle numbers rose 4 percent to total 96,851,000, or just slightly above the previous record number on hand on January 1, 1956. Changes in loan, investment, and deposit accounts at weekly reporting member banks in the District were comparatively small during the 4 weeks ended February 18. Loan liquidation of $7 million, heavily weighted by a $1 7 million reduction in interbank loans, was somewhat less than seasonal. Real-estate loans and agricultural loans continued the downward movements Which had developed in earlier weeks, and securities loans also declined. However, business loans and consumer-type loans registered notable gains. Continued strength in business loan demand is indicated by the $19 million increase recorded for these loans in the 4 weeks ended February 18. In the corresponding period a year ago, $5 million of business loans was liquidated. In the residual loan category refiecting predominantly consumer loans, the $11 million gain was almost three times the rise in the comparable period of 1958. Investment liquidation of $14 million occurred in the 4 weeks, despite a net increase of $41 million in Treas- F.b.19, 1958 $ 1,671 ,694 $ 1,652,957 $1,477,660 46,252 26,647 38,375 16,473 21,802 22,887 167,577 178,702 185,474 2 17,882 22 1,029 199,828 30,4 31 18, 150 13,030 639,952 661,501 650,654 -2,802,986 2,809,684 49,1 67 2,546,287 44,8 11 2,760,517 2,501,476 145,480 327,312 904,34 1 332,684 62,167 65,427 189,880 823,258 268,923 Balances with banks in forei gn co untries • •• •• .. Currency and coin • .... . ..• . ••••.••• • • • ••• • Reserves with Federal Rese rve Bank .. • • • ..••.. Other asse ts ••• • • • .. . .• •••. .•. • ..... . ••• . . 486,330 504,827 1,734 47,755 587,11 0 185, 106 49 1,840 461,6 17 1,883 49,458 577,077 200,029 1,409,655 380,396 513,733 1,429 47,880 564,972 187,299 TOTAL ASSETS ... ..... . . . . ... ........ 6,339,550 6,329,157 5,606,840 2,890,952 147,987 244,909 948,985 14,914 149,156 3,005,308 98,294 2 16,421 1,002,2 86 17,379 65,289 2,734,021 62,4 37 181,632 893,524 17, 114 57,877 Gross loans• . .........•.••.... ... ••.•.• Less reserve s and una llocated charge-offs • • N et loan s. .. . . .. . ..... ... ••••...• ... . .. U. S. Tr. a sury bllls .... ... . ..... . ........ . .. 48,936 2,754,050 --117,680 129,273 264,972 914,734 345,979 U. S. Treasury certificates of indebtedn ess • .•. . . U. S. Treas ury notes • •• • . . ••..••.•••• . .. . . . • U. S. Governm.nt bonds {Inc. gtd. obligations)... in most of the District states were slightly below those at this time a year ago. Ja n. 21, 1959 F.b. 18, 1959 Item 1958 Oth er securities . • . • . •••• •• •••• . ••... .... •• Tota l investments . .....••.••••..•••.• • ••. Cash items in process of coll ection . • •••• •. •••• - 76,919 -- -- --1,772,638 1,786,736 8alances with banks in the Unit.d Stat.s • .• . •.. lIA81LITIES AND CAPITAL Dema nd d eposits Individuals, partn erships, an d corporations• . •• Unit ed States Gove rnment . • • •. •••• •• . .. .. Sta tes and political subdivisions •..•. ... .• . • Banks in the United Sta tes . . .. . . . ... .. ..••• Ba nks in foreign countries . .•.•••. ... . •.•.• Certi fi ed and ofAcers' checks, etc .• •.. . . . .. • Total d.ma nd deposits . . •. . • ... .• . ••••• Time deposits Individua ls, partnerships, and corporations •• •• Uni ted Sta tes Government . . • • . • . ••.••• . • . Posta l savi ngs . •••.•. .. ..•.• ••• •.•• . .... Stat es and political subdivisions • • . • .•.. .. . . Banks in the U. S. a nd f oreig n co untries • •. ..• Tota l time deposits .. • . .. ..... •. . . ••••• Tota l deposits .. . . ... ..... .•.•.••••• -- --4,396,903 4,404,977 --- --1,087,271 7,130 42 1 186,932 6,87 1 1,074,863 7,130 42 1 179,024 6,870 847,739 12,, 125 42 1 202,637 6,438 4 1,700 90,517 521,805 46,500 94,539 514,833 5,0 15,965 11 ,891 100,845 478, 139 6,339,550 6,329,157 5,606,840 --1,288,625 1,268,30 8 --4,785,528 5,673,2 85 --- Bills payable, re discounts, etc .•• . • • . .. ..• ...• All oth.r liabilities . . ••• . ....• ... •..••• • •••• Total capital accounts . .. •.•••••• . •• .. ••.. . • TOTAL LIABILITIES AN D CAPITAl. . • . . . . . 3,946,605 --- 1,069,360 RESE RVE POSITIONS O F ME M BER BA NKS Elevent h Fed eral Reserve Distric t (Avera ges of daily figures. In tho usa nds of do llars)' It. m Ja nuary December January 1959 1958 1958 $ 567,572 559,600 7,972 28,765 -20,793 $ 569,078 56 1,149 7,929 8,387 -45 8 $ 565,692 553,549 12,143 10,487 1,656 465,734 4 16,695 49,039 2,020 47,0 19 456,265 408,674 47,591 3,180 44,4 11 468,679 419,081 49,598 2,097 47,501 1,033,306 976,295 57,0 11 30,785 26,22 6 1,025,343 969,82 3 55,520 11,567 4 3,953 1,034,371 972,630 61 ,74 1 12,584 49, 157 RESERVE CITY BANKS Rese rve ba lances •••. ... .. .•.•.••• Required reserves . • . .••... . .... .. Excess reserves • •••.• . •••••• • .. . . Borrowing s•. . .. •••. . .. . ....••••. Free reserves • . ..••• • . . . . . . .. .. . . COUNTRY BANKS Res erve balances •• •• ....••..• . •.• Re quire d reserves • . ........ .. .... Exc ess reserves . •••...•.•..••.. .. Borrowings. . .. ......... .. •...••• Fre e reserves • .•.. • ••••••••••. ... MEMBER BANKS Reserve balances • • •• ... . ..• . •••.. Required reserves • •••. ... ..• • •••. Exc ess rese rves . •. •. ........ ... • • Borrowing s• .. .. . • . .•. . .•••... .. • Free reserves . • •• . .•••... . .•••••. B USIN ES S RE V IE W I ury bill holdings. The increase in bill holdings reflected largely bank acquisitions of a special issue of 217-day Tax Anticipation bills dated February 16. Weekly reporting member banks also expanded their holdings of Government bonds and non-Government investments, but net liquidation of Treasury notes and certificates of indebtedness more than offset these gains. Deposits rose modestly during the 4-week period, reflecting primarily a $20 million increase in time accounts. This increase in time balances reverses the declining pattern of late 1958 and early 1959. In the demand deposit categories, personal and business accounts decreased substantially, but advances in other classes of deposits almost erased the decline. The reserve positions of country banks in the District eased slightly in January. As these banks gained reserve funds, they reduced their borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and made a small addition to their excess reserve balances. At reserve city banks, however, reserve positions tightened appreciably during January. CONDITION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS (In thousonds of dollars) Fe b. 18, 1959 Item Totol gold certiAcate re.erv...... . . . . . . • • . .• $ 783,026 Discounts for member bonks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,041 Other discounts and advances .............. 952 U. S. Government securitie. ... . . . . . . . . • • . . . . 997,686 Total earning a ssets .... .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . 1,009,679 Member bank reserve deposits..... . . . .. . . . . 1,004,943 Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation.. . . . 777,270 Jan. 21, 1959 Feb. 19, 1958 $ 741,224 27,691 952 1,000,122 1,028,765 997,076 783,224 $79 8,685 1,350 o 915,313 916,663 975,283 717,508 Primarily as a result of reductions in discounts for member banks, earning assets of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas declined $19 million during the 4 weeks ended February 18. Holdings of Government securities also decreased, reflecting net System sales during the period. The Bank's Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation showed a 4-week decline of $6 million, but the amount in circulation on February 18 was 8 percent above the year-earlier level. NEW PAR BANK The North State Bank of Amarillo, Amarillo, Texas, a newly organized, insured, nonmember bank located in the territory served by the Head Office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, was added to the Par List on its opening date, February 5, 1959. The officers are: H. V. Tull, Jr., Board Chairman; Frank P. Sharman, President; J. F. Leake, Vice President and Cashier; and Charles Hines, Assistant Cashier. I BUSINESS 10 .EVIEW The major developments in District petroleum operations in January and early February centered about the continued large demand for petroleum products, a major refinery strike, and weakening crude oil prices. District refineries operated at a higher rate in January but slowed operations early in February, partially as a result of a strike which idled a 275,000 barrel-per-day refinery at Port Arthur. Product prices generally moved upward in the first weeks of 1959, in spite of increased refinery yields and record imports of refined products. The crude price cuts were broadened and extended to most west Texas crude oil output. Cold weather and continued economic recovery accelerated demand for most major refined products in January and early February. Distillate demand in the 5 weeks ended February 13 was an impressive 11 percent above the comparable period in 1958. Rising industrial activity was generally responsible for the increased demand for residual fuel oil, which reached 9 percent over a year ago. Gasoline demand declined seasonally but was also significantly above 1958. Prices of refined products, with the exception of gasoline, advanced or were very firm in January and early February. Gasoline prices were weak, and in specific localities, price Will'S developed. The high level of product demand was reflected in heavy crude runs to refinery stills in January. District crude runs during the month averaged 10 percent above a year earlier. At 2,176,000 barrels per day, refinery operations remained high in early February, although they were somewhat below the January rate. Refinery runs were cut back more sharply in the District than in the Nation, partly because of the continued strike at 'Port Arthur. Rapidly increasing imports of refined products also tended to depress domestic refinery output in February. Product imports in the 5 weeks ended February 13 advanced 13 percent to a level 60 percent above the similar period in 1958. In contrast, crude oil imports were 13 percent lower. Daily average crude oil production in the District and the Nation in early February advanced only slightly, although production in the Eleventh District, averaging 3,251,000 barrels per day, was 4 percent above a year ago. Continued high-level refinery runs have lowered crude oil stocks in the District and the Nation, with national stocks at 256,032,000 barrels on February 14. However, this reduction has not prevented some rather general cuts in crude prices in west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Although industry nominations for March crude oil production were lower than the February totals, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas allowables in March are virtually unchanged. March ,allowable production in Texas, at 3,138,565 barrels per day, is down 1 percent. Major producers involved in refinery strikes accounted for the decline in total industry estimates of demand. The levels of both nominations and allowables reflect the industry's feeling that there will not be drastic mandatory reductions in crude or refined imports in March. Announcements made during the first 6 weeks of 1959 indicate that the natural gas industry is planning Very heavy capital expenditures; 11,000 miles of new transmission lines and 16,000 miles of feeder pipelines and mains are scheduled for completion this year. Preliminary drilling indicates a possible new major field bordering the Eleventh District along the Canadian and Arkansas Rivers. However, the number of gas wells discovered in the District during the first 6 weeks of 1959 was 41 percent below the same period last year. Nonagricultural employment in the District states during J anuary reflected an approximately normal seasonal decline of 107,000 workers from December, and the 4,217,700 total was 0.4 percent higher than the depressed level of January 1958, representing the first year-to-year gain in 11 months. Most of the seaSonal decline from December resulted from readjustments in trade and government employment following the Christmas season. Unemployment in Texas rose 29,300, or about seaSonally, from December to reach 191 ,3 00, which is 5.6 percent of the civilian labor force. Available data on Unemployment covered by jobless insurance programs Show that this type of unemployment in the District states during mid-January ranged from slightly more than 3 percent, of the covered labor force in New MeXico and Texas to nearly 6 percent in Louisiana, compared with a national rate of 6 percent. Industrial production in Texas held steady in J anuary, with the seasonally adjusted index remaining at 167. Preventing a rise in the January index were the Weakness in petroleum production and the worker layoffs at aircraft plants in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION = 100) (Seasonally odiusted indexes, 1947·49 Jon. 1959p Areo and type of index Dec. 1958 1958 Jon . 1958 16 1r 194r 234r 176r 129r 133 135 142 127 12 1 Nov. TEXAS Tota l industrial production..... . . .. . . . Total monuloctures. . ...... .. .. . . . .. 167 201 167 197r Du rabl e manufactures........ . . .. . .. 230 228r Nondurable manufactures... . ... .•... Minerals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNITED STATES Tota l industrial production..... . . . . .• . Tota l manufactures. . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dura bl e manufactures .. . . . . . .. . . . • . . Nondu ra bl e manufactures. . • . . . . . . . . . Minera ls.. . ... .. . . ... . . .. . .. . . . . .• 187 135 183r 138r 165 197r 232r 181r 134r 143 145 154 137 122 142 144 152 135r 123 141 143r 151 r 135 123 p - Preliminary, r - Rovlsed. SOURCES: Boord of Governors of the Federal Reserve Syste m. Federal Reserve Bonk of Dallas. A work stoppage by about 4,500 workers which began in late January at a large Port Arthur oil refinery was a depressing influence on February production. Construction contract awards in the District states during December rose 4 percent over November, but the total for the month was 11 percent below the level of December 1957 - the first year-to-year reduction since March 1958. Accounting for this weakness was a 32-percent decline in nonresidential construction. Residential awards were 30 percent above December 1957. For 1958 as a whole, total construction awards reflected a gain of 15 percent. Regarding the prospects for industrial construction in the S?~thwest, a survey of manufacturers' plans by the LOUlsla~a Departm~nt of Commerce and Industry shows that lllvestment In new plants and additions to plants in Louisiana during 1959 may total nearly $213 million, or 8 percent higher than in 1958. NONAGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT Five Southwestern States' Perc ent change Number of persons January Type of em ployment 195ge Jan. 1959 from December January Dec. Jan. 1958 1958r 1958 1958 4,324,700 760,600 3,564,100 248,500 311,900 4,200, 100 769,800 3,430,300 264,300 285,400 -2.5 - 1.5 -2.7 -1.1 -2.3 0.4 -2.6 1.1 -7.0 6.7 396,500 1,102,200 186,200 504,000 814,800 406,100 1,030,200 181,700 493,000 769,600 -.3 -6.1 -.3 -1.0 -1.5 -2.7 .5 2. 1 1.2 4.3 Total nonagricultural wage and salary workers . . 4,2 17,700 Ma nufacturing ••. .... .•.. 749,500 Nonmanufacturing . •...... 3,468,200 Mining . . ............ . 245,800 Construction • .•••••• • .. 304,600 Tran sportation and public utilities .• ...••. . .... 395,200 Trad e •...... . ........ 1,035,100 Finance •••. .........•. 185,600 Service ... .........•.. 499,100 Government . ... . . ... . . 802,800 1 Arizona, Louisiana , New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. e - Estimated. r - Revised . SOURCES , State omployment age ncie s. Federal Reserve Bonk of Dallas. BUSINESS REVIEW 11 BANK DEBITS, END-Of-MONTH DEPOSITS AND ANNUAL RATE Of TURNOV,ER Of DEPOSITS CONDITION STATISTICS Of ALL MEMBER BANKS (Dollar amounts in thousands) (In millions of dollars) Eleventh federal Reserve Districl Deb its to d em and Dec. Jan. 1958 1958 1959 Area Annual rate of turnov er Janua ry 31, Dec. Jon. Jan . 1959 1958 1958 1959 ARIZONA Tucson •••• ...••••.•• $ 231,912 2 21 $ 122,735 22.7 22.9 21.7 18.4 21.6 19.7 20.6 16.9 18.8 14.6 LOUISIANA Monroe .... ... . .... . Shreveport •...... . .. NEW MEXICO Roswell ............. TEXAS Abilene .... . ........ Amarillo . .......... . Austin ............. . Be aumont ••.. .....•• Corpus Christi ..... ... Corsicana .... .. .. .. . Dallas •............. EI Pa so ....... ...... Fort Worth ...... .... Galveston ....... .... Houston •••. •. ••.. • • laredo .. ....... .... Lubbock •.... • .•.. .. Port Arthur • ......... San Ang .lo ......... San Antonio . ... ... .. Texarkana ', .. ... .. . Tyl.r ..... .... ...... Waco . •...... ...•.. Wichita Falls • ....... 80,393 328,076 -4 4 7 8 52,596 178,953 38,584 - 6 11 31,660 14.5 15.7 97,857 -6 1 221,767 15 0 196,965 2 10 163,026 - 6 -4 205,576 4 6 4 19,983 -3 3 2,730,484 - 9 377,624 -1 13 823,505 -7 7 85,505 -15 -10 2,575,551 -8 1 26,995 -2 -7 243,654 6 15 68,463 4 -2 53,723 0 0 586,731 -7 7 21,877 1 6 93,304 - 1 -1 109,116 2 9 120,046 -2 9 64,428 122,708 147,866 106,266 115,051 20,625 1,140,732 181,321 376,547 66,233 1,249,988 21,796 128,998 46,105 45,255 387,242 17,379 62,003 71,039 110,084 18.1 21.5 16.1 18.1 20.9 11.0 27.1 25.3 25.8 15.8 24.0 14.6 22.3 17.5 14.4 17.9 15.2 17.5 17.9 12.5 19.7 21.7 16.7 18.6 19.4 10.2 30.0 26.5 27.6 18.8 25.9 15.6 22.2 16.8 14.8 19.2 15.4 17.8 17.6 12.7 19.2 21.0 16.8r 17.8 20.4 11.2 30.8 26.2 25 .9 16.0 25.3 15.5 22.1 17.8 15.5 18.8 15.1 18.1 17.9 12.2 $4,867,610 22.8 24.4 23.8 Total-24 cities . ..... . . $9,500,717 D.c. 3 1, 1958 Jan. 29, 1958 loons and discounts. . ........ .. .... .. . . . United Stat es Governm ent obligations . ....• Other securities . ... . ........... . ... ... . Reserves with Federal Rese rve Bank .. .. ... . Cash in vault e . . . ...... .. ...... . . .. ... . Balance s with banks in th e Unite d States . . .• Balances with banks in foreig n countri es e .. . . Ca sh ite ms in process of coll ection . .... . .. . Other assets e . .. ...... .... . ....... •. . .. $ 4,532 2,759 816 985 144 1,029 2 492 289 $ 4,604 2,716 827 965 151 1,321 3 666 302 $ 4,090 2,359 675 984 148 1,031 2 434 275 TOT AL ASSETse ..... ........... .... . 11,048 11,555 9,998 Demand deposits of banks . ............. . Other d emand de posits .... .... ..... . .. . . Time deposits.. .. .. ............•.... , . . 1,120 6,780 2,108 1,428 7,044 2,088 1,070 6,286 1,693 Total deposits . . ....... . ........ .... . Borrowings e . ..... . . ....•......... ..... Oth er liabillties e . .. ...... ........ ... .. . Total capita l accounts e . ...... .. . .... ...• 10,008 53 114 873 10,560 1 125 869 9,049 15 121 813 TOTAL L1A81L1T1ES AND CAPIT ALe ..... . 11,048 11,555 ~ Item Percentage chang e from January Jan. 28, 1959 Dem and d e posits l de posit accounts l - 6 4 ASSETS L1A81L1TIEs AND CAPITAL • - Estimated. BU ILDING PERM ITS =VALUATION (Dollar amounts in thousands) Percentage change 1 Depo sits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations and of stat es and political subd ivision s . !! in NUM8ER These figures Include only one bonk in Texarkana, Texas. Total debi ts for all banks Tex arkana, Tex as-Arkan sas, including one bank located in the Eighth DI st rict, amounted to $46,773 ,000 for th e month of January 1959. r- January 1959 from January January Decem b er January 1959 1959 1958 1958 -20 -33 Area Revised. ARIZONA 320 $ 1,103 362 2,012 4 -32 Wichita Falls .....•.... 293 331 268 271 84 1,773 507 588 87 1,470 319 112 1,229 199 159 2,425 5,507 4,269 1,288 1,863 12,094 4,412 3,067 237 18,910 3,537 474 4,788 1,536 1,218 -11 276 -20 -25 53 22 -32 -16 -54 0 22 -2 9 65 14 155 86 192 22 41 48 21 17 -42 50 27 77 -43 56 49 432 Totol-17 cities .... .• .... 8,372 $68,740 8 25 Tucson . •. . ... . ........ LOUISIANA Shreyeport • •.......... NATURAL GAS: MARKETED PRODUCTION TEXAS (In millions of cubic f•• t) Area louisiana . .•.............•.• New Mexico ••••.... .• ..•.... Oklahoma ................. . Texas ............••....... . Total ..... .......... .. .. .. Third quarter 1958 Second quart er 1958 Third quart.r 1957 475,500 154,000 158,100 1,292,300 480,200 168,800 176,600 1,256, 200 424,000 178,600 143,500 1,26 8,300 2,079,900 2,014,400 2,081,800 SOURCE , United States 8ureau of Mines. Abilene .••. . ... ...... Amari ll o . ... . . .. .... . Austin ......... .. •.. . Beaumont •. .......... . . . . Corpus Christi .... . ... . . Dallas ................ EI Pa so ....... .. .... .. Fort Worth ............ Galyeston •...• .....•.. Houston . ... . . . . .. .. .. Lubbock .. ............ Port Arthur . . ........ .. San Antonio . . ... ...... Waco .• . .. . .... .. .. .• CRUDE OIL: DAILY AVERAGE PRODUCTION (In thousands of barrels) Change from January Area 1959 1 ELEVENTH DiSTRiCT ...... . . 3,212.0 2,848.0 546.2 1,27 1.6 161.0 105.0 764.2 248.6 115.4 3,902 .1 7,114.1 Texas ..... . ........ .. . . Gulf Coast ............ W est Texas ...... . ... . East Texa s (p ro p.r)• .... Panhandl ............. Rest of State .......... Southeastern New Mexico .. Northern louisiana ••. ..... OUTSIDE ELEVENTH DISTRICT. UNITED STATES .... ........ SOURCES, Dece mber January 1958 1 Dec em b er January 1958' 1958 1958 3,198.5 2,834.1 543.7 1,259.0 159.6 103.8 767.9 250.3 114.2 3,904.9 7,103.5 3,097.7 2,728.2 529.6 1,195.6 157.6 108.5 736.9 255.0 114.5 3,767.1 6,864.8 13.5 13.9 2.5 12.6 1.4 1.2 -3.7 -1.7 1.2 -2.8 10.6 114.3 119.8 16.6 76.0 3.4 -3.5 27.3 -6.4 .9 135.0 249.3 1 Estimated from Ame rican Pet rol.um !l United States Bureau of Mines. BUSINESS REVIEW 12 Institute weekly reports. VALUE Of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AWARDED (In thousands of dollars)' = January-December __ Area and type December November December 1958 1958 1957 FIVE SOUTHWESTERN sTATEsI •......... $ 249,502 $ 240,992 $ 278,992 124,843 124,535 96,134 Residential. . .....• 116,457 124,659 182,858 All oth.r .... ... ... UNITED STATES .. . ... 2,281,881 2,593,855 1,982,342 758,580 981,012 1,205,712 Residential .. ...... All oth.r .... . ..... 1,300,869 1,388,143 1,223,762 1 Arizona, louisiana, New Moxic~, Oklahoma, and Texas. SOURCE , c. W. Dodge Corporallon. 1958 1957 3,939,728 $ 3425,47 2 1,691,041 1:314,78~ 2,110,68 2,248,687 35,089,703 32 173,4 12 14,695,531 13:039,OO~ 20,394,172 19,134,40