View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

OPEC and U.S. Production Shape Oil Market Dynamics
First Quarter 2017
In an effort to reduce record high global crude oil inventories, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) along with 11 non-OPEC countries implemented a six-month production cut on Jan. 1. For the
past two months, Saudi Arabia and some other Persian
Gulf states have reduced production by more than their
pledged targets. However, global crude oil inventories
have not shown any signs of significant drawdowns, and
rising U.S. production threatens the effectiveness of
OPEC cuts. While the cuts may be extended into the second half of this year, it is not clear whether an extension
would be sufficient to boost market prices much higher
than what we have already seen.
Saudi Arabia Shoulders Majority of the Production
Cuts
OPEC reported that its agreement was successfully implemented in January and February, with overall production falling below its targeted level. However, the large
decline in production was mainly driven by the Gulf
states—Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates. Particularly, Saudi Arabia is estimated to have
reduced its production by more than its pledged target.
Excluding Saudi Arabia, OPEC achieved 70 percent of its
targeted cuts (Chart 1).
Moreover, OPEC members not bound to production cuts,
namely Iran, Libya and Nigeria, offset the decline from
the rest of OPEC by about a quarter million barrels per
day (mb/d), consequently benefiting from higher prices.
Due to lack of data, it is difficult to gauge whether nonOPEC countries are complying with their planned cuts.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that
non-OPEC countries have implemented only 37 percent
of their promised cuts so far.
No Signs of Inventory Draws Yet
Available inventory estimates so far do not point to
drawdowns, notwithstanding the large decline in crude
oil production reported by OPEC. Recent weekly estimates of U.S. commercial crude oil inventories are at
their highest levels since 1986 (Chart 2). Most of the
increase in inventories so far this year is due to higher
imports, particularly from OPEC.
With no signs of the long-awaited inventory draws in
weekly estimates, markets sent West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices back under $50 per barrel in
early March for the first time since November 2016. Recent changes in total crude oil inventories in OrganizaFederal Reserve Bank of Dallas

tion for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
countries align with those in the U.S. According to the IEA,
total OECD crude oil stocks went up by 32.4 million barrels
in January.1 These inventory numbers suggest that the significant production cuts reportedly achieved by OPEC have
not been able to shrink excess crude inventories.
Factors Weighing on Extending the Cuts
Some analysts suggest that it is essential for OPEC to extend its production cuts into the second half of 2017 to
trigger a material inventory drawdown, given the current
glut in crude oil inventories. The rationale for extending
cuts goes beyond the crude oil market. First, economic
conditions have deteriorated in Saudi Arabia and the rest
of the OPEC Gulf states following the oil price crash. At
least 50 percent of these countries’ government revenues
rely on fossil fuel sales, according to the International Monetary Fund. Prolonged low crude oil prices have resulted in
elevated government debt, posing the risk of deeper fiscal
imbalance in these countries (Chart 3).

Quarterly Energy Update

1

Second, Saudi Arabia is set for a public offering of the
currently government-owned Saudi Arabian Oil Co.
(Saudi Aramco) in 2018. Maintaining prices as high as
possible by reducing inventories will lower downside
risks to oil prices in the near term, providing support
for a higher valuation of the firm. However, this strategy is not without pitfalls as higher oil prices also incentivize other producers to increase production.
U.S. Producers Set to Recover
Despite some initial skepticism around implementation
of OPEC cuts, crude prices rose about 20 percent immediately following the deal and have remained in a
relatively tight range for most of this year. WTI prices
fluctuated between $52 and $54 per barrel until falling
below $50 in early March.
This stabilization in prices had led to positive developments in the U.S. oil industry, which challenges OPEC’s
efforts to push prices higher. U.S. crude oil production
in March is expected to be around 9 mb/d, marking a 5
percent increase since last September, when production
bottomed out (Chart 4). It is also the highest level
since April 2016. Notably, production in the Permian
Basin region is estimated to have increased around 4
percent since last December.
Leading indicators point to a further, larger U.S. production increase. The U.S. rig count has risen 17 percent since December, while Texas has experienced a 19
percent increase. Specifically, the Permian rig count is
at its highest level since April 2015, while that in the
Eagle Ford has modestly increased since October 2016.
More importantly, the recent drop in prices has not yet
put a brake on rising U.S. production. In fact, many
producers through hedging have already locked in higher prices for barrels that will be produced in coming
months. Shale producers have become more efficient
weathering the prolonged energy downturn (Chart 5),
and industry contacts report lower breakeven prices.
With these developments, U.S. shale production should
be more resilient to oil price fluctuations.
OPEC will meet on May 25 to determine whether to extend its cut into the second half of this year. Even if
extended, U.S. production is expected to grow throughout 2017 and will be a central challenge to OPEC’s efforts to reduce global inventories. Hence, it remains
uncertain whether an extension would push prices significantly above recent highs.

…………………………………………………………………………………………
About the Authors
Jo is a senior economist and Lee is a research assistant in
the Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas.

—Soojin Jo and Justin J. Lee

Note
1. There is much less information on non-OECD crude
oil inventories. OPEC exports data, which may contain some information about total global inventory
changes, are only available with a significant time
lag.

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Quarterly Energy Update

2