View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

News

Bureau of Labor Statistics

United States
Department
of Labor
Washington, D.C. 20212

Historical, technical
information: (202) 523-9261
Current data : (202) 523-1221
Media contact: (202) 523-1913

USDL 92-60
TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL IN THIS
RELEASE IS EMBARGOED UNTIL
10:00 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY
FEBRUARY 5, 1992

PRODUCTIVITY AMD COSTS
Preliminary Fourth Quarter
and Annual Averages, 1991

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported
preliminary fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change-^
&s measured by output per hour of all persons—and annual changes for the full year
1991. The changes were:

Business sector
,
Nonfarm business sector
Manufacturing.
Durable gbods manufacturing.
Nondurable goods manufacturing...

Fourth
quarter
1.6
1.1
1.5
1.1
2.1

Annual averages
1990-1991
0.2
0.2
1.4
1.3
1.6

In business and nonfarm business, productivity rose only slightly in 1991, the
second straight year in which productivity was virtually unchanged. Growth in
manufacturing productivity was stronger than in the more comprehensive business
sectors, but resulted from larger declines in output and hours than in the business
sectors.
In the fourth quarter, productivity increased in business, nonfarm business, and
manufacturing as output showed little growth and hours declined. Fourth-quarter and
annual 1991 measures are summarised in tables A and B and appear in detail in tables
1 through 5.

THIRD-TO-rOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 1991
Business
Productivity increased at a 1.6 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of
1991 in the business sector, as output growth slowed to a 0.1 percent annual rate
and hours of all persons engaged in the sector declined 1.5 percent (seasonally adjusted). During the third quarter of 1991, business productivity had increased 1.1
percent, but output grew 1.8 percent and hours rose 0.7 percent (table 1).




Table A. Productivity and costs: /Preliminary fourth-quarter 1991
measures
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates)

Productivity

Sector

Output

Hours

Hourly
compensatibn

Real
hourly
compensation

Unit
labor
costs

Percent change from preceding quarter
Business
Konfarm business
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondurable

1.6
1.1
1.5
1.1
2.1

2.9
2.4

-0.2
-0.7

1.3

-1.2

-1.5
-1.1
-0.7
-2.3

4.0
5.4

0.8
2.2

3.6

1.5

2.2

-0.9

2.5
4.3
0.1

0.1
0.0
0.8

1.3-

Percent change from same quarter a year ago
Business
Nonfarm business
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondurable

1.1
1.0
1.9
1.5
2.4

-0.4
-0.5
-0.3
-2.0

2.0

-1.5
-1.4
-2.2
-3.5
-0.3

3.2
3.1
3.5
4.0
2.9

0.3
0.2
0.5
1.1
0.0

2.1
2.1
1.5
2.5
0.5

Hourly compensation increased at a 2.9 percent annual rate during the fourth
quarter of 1991, compared with a 2.8 percent increase during the third quarter.
This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to
employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in
hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 1.3 percent annual rate during
the fourth quarter, down from a 1.7 percent increase one quarter earlier. This was
the smallest Increase in these costs since the first quarter of 1988 (when a 0.2
percent decline occurred).
Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), fell 0.2 percent in both the third and fourth
quarters. This series declined during 9 of the past 12 quarters.
The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in unit
labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased a scant 1.0 percent in the fourth
quarter, the smallest increase since 1970 (when a 0.9 percent increase occurred in
the third quarter). During the third quarter of 1991, prices of the goods and
services which comprise business output had increased at a 1.8 percent annual rate.

Nonfarm business
In the nonfarm business sector, productivity gained 1.1 percent in the fourth
quarter. Output was unchanged, and hours of all persons—employees, proprietors,
and unpaid family workers—fell 1.1 percent. The decline in hours resulted from a
0.9 percent reduction in employment (the sixth in a row) and a 0.2 percent
shortening of the average work week. During the third quarter, nonfarm productivity




had increased 0.9 percent as output grew 1.6 percent and hours increased 0.7 percent
(table 2). As in the more comprehensive business sector, the drop in hours was the
third in 1991.
Hourly compensation rose 2.4 percent in the fourth quarter, but fell 0.7 percent
when the increase in the CPI-U was taken into account. As in the more comprehensive
business sector, this series has declined in 9 quarters of the 1989-1991 period.
Unit labor costs increased 1.3 percent, compared with a 1.8 percent rise during the
third quarter.
The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.5 percent in the
fourth quarter, compared with a 2*1 percent increase one quarter earlier. This was
the smallest rise in prices since 1986 (when a 0.9 percent increase was recorded in
the second quarter).
Manufacturing
Manufacturing productivity rose at a 1.5 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate
in the fourth quarter of 1991, not much different from the more comprehensive
business sector reported above. Output rose 0.8 percent and hours of all persons
decreased 0.7 percent. The decline in hours was the third decrease of 1991.
During the third quarter, productivity had increased 4.0 percent, as output rose 7.1
percent and hours gained 3.0 percent (table 3). Both durable and nondurable goods
industries experienced productivity increases in the fourth quarter, but the
movements reflected opposite trends in output and hours. While both underlying
series declined among durable goods manufacturing industries, both output and hours
grew in nondurable goods production (tables 4 and 5).
Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 4.0 percent during
the fourth quarter, but edged up only 0.8 percent when the increase in consumer
prices was taken into account. Unit labor costs rose at a 2.5 percent annual rate
in the fourth quarter of 1991, compared with a 1.7 percent decrease during the third
quarter.

ANNUAL CHANGES, 1990-1991
Business
Business productivity increased 0.2 percent when the annual average for 1990 is
compared with the average for 1991 (table B), the same increase as in 1990* Output
fell 1.5 percent in 1991, and hours of all persons engaged in the sector decreased
1.7 percent. During 1990, output and hours both grew somewhat.
Hourly compensation increased 3.9 percent in 1991, compared with a 5.4 percent
increase during 1990. Unit labor costs increased 3.7 percent during 1991, compared
with a 5,2 percent increase one year earlier. Real hourly compensation declined 0.3
percent in 1991, compared with no change in 1990. At 102.8, the index of real
hourly compensation for 1991 is lower than that of any year since 1985, when it
stood at 101.3 (1982-100).




Table B. Annual changes in productivity and related measures, 1982-1991
Sector and
measure

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

0.1
-2.3
Hours. . * ... ........ -2.5

2.2

7,6
1.3
Real hourly comp...
Unit labor costs . . . 7.4

3.7
0 .5
1.5

2.3
8.2
5.7
4.2
-0.1
1.9

1.4
3.6
2.1
4.5
0,9
3.0

2 .0
2 .8
0 .7
4.9
3 .0
2 .8

1.0
4.1
3.1
3.5
-0.1
2.5

0.9
4.3
3.3
4.3

0.1
3.3

-0.7
1.8
2,6
3.5
-1.2
4.3

0.8

0.9

-0.9

3.3
3.4
-0.2
2.6

3.5

4.1
4.9
0.7
2.2
-1.4
-1.8

4.0
7.1
2.9
3.9
-0.2
-0.1

1988

1989

1990

1991

Business:

Nonf arm Business:
Productivity. *...».
On^T*kn+* '

0.1
-2 4

-2.4
7.5
Real hourly comp. . . 1.2
Unit labor costs . . . 7.4
Hours. .............

Manufacturings
Productivity. . . . . 3.8
-5.0.
Output . . . . . . , .••-.'.
Hours. . . . ''.'•.• ^ .../..-8.5
.'
9.4
Hourly comp. .......
Real hourly comp. . , 3.1
Unit labor costs . . .5.4

4.1

r.ft

2.4

2.1

0.8

4

8 2

3 4

2.0
3.9
0.7
1.5

6.0
4.0
-0.3
1.9

2.5
4.2

0.6
3.3

1 .9
2
0.9
4 .9
3 .0
2 .9

2.9

2.6
9.4
6.6
3.1
-1.1
0.5

2.3
1.5
-0.8
5.0
1.4
2.7

4 3
?,R
-1 4
4 ,0
2 .1
-0 .3

4

.4,0
1.2
2.5
-0,7
-0.4

2.7
4.1
3.4
0 . 0 -1.4
3.2
4.3

0.5
0.9
0.4
4.0
-0.8
3.5

0.2
0.4
0.2
5.4
0.0
5.2

0.2
-1.5
-1.7
3.9
-0.3
3.7

-0 . 1 0.2
0 3 -1
,J- .6O
0.3 -1.8
5.2
4.0
-0.2 -0.2
3.7
5.3

2.5
0.3
-2.2
5.3
-0.1
2.7

1.4
-2.2
-3.6
4.2
.0,0
2.7

Unit labor costs increased 3.7 percent during 1991, compared with a 5.2 percent
increase a year earlier* Since productivity growth was the same in both years, the
slower growth in these costs during 1991 reflected a slowing of the rate of gain of
hourly compensation.
NOTE: Future revisions due to the regular benchmarking of employment and hours
measures to unemployment insurance records will affect measures incorporating labor
input data (productivity, hourly compensation, real hourly Compensation, and hours
of all persons). The new data might lower the growth of business labor input by 1.5
to 2*5 percentage points in the first quarter of 1991 and by less than half a
percent in the annual movement. Labor input data for the business, nonfarm
business, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corporate sectors may be similarly
affected by the benchmarking.
Nonf arm business

Productivity also increased 0.2 percent in the nonfarm business sector during
1991, as output fell 1.6 percent and hours of all persons decreased 1.8 percent.
Hourly compensation rose 4.0 percent in 1991, but fell 0.2 percent when the increase
in the CPI-U was taken into account.




Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew more slowly in 1991 than in
1990. This reduction reflected both an increase in productivity (compared with a
slight decline in 1990) and a smaller gain in hourly compensation.
Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity increased more rapidly in 1991 than in the more comprehensive business sectors reported above, growing 1.4 percent over the 1990 level.
However, both output and hours simultaneously declined for the year as a whole for
the first time since 1982.' Output fell 2.2 percent in 1991 and hours of all persons
declined 3.6 percent. During 1990, productivity rose 2.5 percent, output inched
ahead 0.3 percent, and hours decreased 2.2 percent.
Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 4.2 percent during 1991,
but was unchanged when the increase in consumer prices was taken into account. This
marked the fifth year in a row real hourly compensation fell or showed no growth for
manufacturing workers. Unit labor costs rose 2.7 percent in both 1991 and 1990.
Both durable and nondurable goods industries experienced productivity increases
in 1991, but gains were faster for nondurables producers (tables 4, 5).
Historical productivity and cost measures for manufacturing (total, durable, and
nondurable) are shown in appendix tables 1-3 from 1977 forward. They incorporate
unpublished revisions to output and compensation measures prepared by the Bureau of
Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce for 1977 through 1989 which
were previously unavailable. These new data include changes reflecting the rebasing
of output deflators to 1987 prices (rather than 1982), the results of the 1989
Annual Survey of Manufactures, and other changes. However, these data do not yet
incorporate other improvements already shown in the revised historical measures for
business, nonfarm business, and nonfinancial corporations, published January 3.
Raviaed third quarter 1991 maasur«s for nonfinancial corporations

Revised productivity and cost measures for the third quarter for nonfinancial
corporations were unchanged from those announced January 3, 1992.

Table C. Preliminary and revised measures for nonfinancial corporations,
third quarter 1991
! Percent change from previous quarter
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates)

Item
Preliminary
Revised




Productivity Output
1.7
1.7

2 .5
2 .5

Hours

Hourly
compensation

0.8
0.8

2.6
2.6

Real
hourly Unit
Implicit
compen- labor Unit
price
sation costs profits deflator
-0.4
-0.4

0:9
0.9

-4.2
-4.2

0.9
0.9

Next release dat*
The next issue of Productivity and Coats is scheduled for release at 10:00 AM
EST, Tuesday, March 10, 1992, and will contain preliminary annual measures for
nonfinancial corporations, and revised fourth quarter and annual measures for
business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing.
NOTE: New and revised annual productivity measures for 1990 for 173 selected
U.S. industries were released on December 30, 1991, in USDL 91-661, Productivity by
Industry: 1990. Call (202) 523-9244 for further information.

LABOR NEWS
at your fingertips
You can now get the summary text portion of this and other U.S. Department of Labor news releases quickly
and easily through LABOR NEWS- a free electronic bulletin board providing a variety of labor-related
information and available to anyone with a computer, a modem, and communications software. To register
directly, load the following parameters into your computer:
PHONE number:
BAUD speed:
PARITY:
DATAbits:
STOP bit:

(202) 523-4784
300,1200, or 2400
none
8
1

After you have made a connection to LABOR NEWS, follow the registration prompts. Users must pay any toll
for long-distance calls. For more information call (202) 523-7243, Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
EST.




TECHNICAL NOTES

Information in this release will be made available to sensory-impaired
individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-523-1221; TDD phone: 202-523-3926; TDD
message referral phone number: 1-800-326-2577,
Labor Input: The primary source of hours and employment data is the BLS Current
Employment Statistics (CES) program, which provides monthly survey data on total
employment and average weekly hours of production and nonsupervisory workers in
nonagricultural establishments. Jobs rather than persons are counted. Weekly hours
are adjusted to the hours at work definitionusing the BLS Hours at Work survey,
conducted for this purpose.
Data from the BLS Current Population Survey (CPS) are used for farm labor; in the
nonfarm sector, the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) prepared by the
Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce and the CPS are used to
measure labor input for government enterprises, proprietors, unpaid family workers,
and paid employees of private households.
Output: Business sector output is equal to gross national product (GNP) in constant
1987 dollars, less the rest-of-the-world sector, general government, output of
nonprofit institutions, output of paid employees of private households, rental value
of owner-occupied dwellings, and the statistical discrepancy in computing the NIPA.
Corresponding exclusions are also made in labor inputs. Business output was about
81 percent of GNP in 1990. Nonfarm business, which also excludes farming, was about
79 percent of GNP in 1990.
Total manufacturing measures are computed by summing series prepared for the durable
and nondurable goods sectors. Durables include the following 2-digit SIC
industries: Primary metals; fabricated metal products; industrial machinery and
equipment; electronic and other electric equipment; transportation equipment;
instruments; lumber and lumber products; furniture and fixtures; stone, clay, and
glass products; and miscellaneous manufactures. Nondurables include: Textile mill
products, apparel products, paper and allied products, leather and leather products,
printing and publishing, chemicals and chemical products, petroleum products, rubber
and plastic products, food, and tobacco products. Manufacturing accounted for about
22 percent of GNP in 1990.
Nonfinancial corporate output is equal to GNP in constant 1987 dollars, less the
rest-^of-the-world sector, general government, output of nonprofit institutions,
output of paid employees of private households, rental value of owner-occupied
dwellings, unincorporated business, the output of corporations engaged in banking,
finance, stock and commodity trading, and credit and insurance agencies, and the
statistical discrepancy in computing the NIPA. Nonfinancial corporations accounted
for about 60 percent of GNP in 1990.
PRODUCTIVITY: These productivity measures describe the relationship between real
output and the labor time involved in its production. They show the changes from
period to period in the amount of goods and services produced per hour. Although
these measures relate output to hours at work of all persons engaged in a sector,
they do not measure the specific contribution of labor, capital, or any other factor
of production. Rather, they reflect the joint effects of many influences, including
changes in technology; capital investment; level of output; utilization of capacity,
energy, and materials; the organization of production; managerial skill; and the
characteristics and effort of the work force.




Table 1. Business sector: Productivity, hourly .compensation, .unit labor cost, and prices, seasonally
adjusted
Heal
Implicit
Unit noncompensaUnit
CompensaHours
Output
Year
Output per
labor pay- price
tion per
labor
tion per
of all
and
hour of
ments (3) deflator (4)
hour (2)
cost
persons hour :(1)
quarter
all persons
,•-" :

1990

1991

' " -;:---<v -\ • • • : • ' . • -

I
II
III
IV

109.6
110.3
109.6
109.4

ANNUAL

109.7

I
II
III
IV
ANNUAL

109.9

.

. ;";;. '' '••;:"'~'

,

'•'

: 131.8

102.6
103.6
103.3
102.6

124.3
126.1
128.5
130.1 .

138.1
138.7
138.0
137.5

128.8
130.2
131.6
132.5

132.9

121.2

139.6

103.1

127.2

138.1

130.8

131,0
131.8
132. 3r
132.8

140,2 !
141.4
142.1
142.3

134,0
135.0
135.6
135.9

132.0

141.5

130*2
130.7
131.3
131.3

119.1
119.0
119.2
118,7

143.2
144.8
145.8
146.9

102.4
103.0
103.0
102.9

130.9

119.1

145.1

102.8

;'.:;,': •; - '

:

1991

1990

1991

' "'

136.2
139.0
140.9
142.3

rate (5)
Percent change from previous quarter at• .' Yannual
' •

1990

'

121.6
121.4
121,2
120.5

133.2
133.9
132.9

109.4
109.9
110.2
110.6

indexes ;i982«100

135.1
L

'

I
II
III
IV

1.7
2.4
-2.2
-0.9

3.0
2.0
-3.0
-3.0 V

1.2
-0.5
-0.8
-2.2

6.6
8.4
5.7
4.1

-0.7
4.3
-1.1
"2.7

4.8
5.8
8.1
5.0

2.4
1.7
-2.2
-1.3

4.0
4.3
4.4
2.8

ANNUAL

0.2

0.4

0.2

5.4

0.0

5.2

1.4

3.8

I
II
III
IV

-0.1
1,9
1.1
1.6

-4;9
^1.7

-4.7

'•'*:"• l.B:^ .
0.1

-1.5

2.6
4.6
2.8
2.9

-0.9
2.4
-0.2
-0.2

2.7
2.6
1.7
1.3.

7.9
3.6
2. Or
0.5

4.5
2.9
1.8
1.0

ANNUAL

0.2

-1.5

-1.7

3.9

-0.3

3.7

2.5

3 .3

2.8
1,6
1.0
0/2

3.7
3.7
4.1
3.9

I
II
III
IV

:

-0.3 ;
0.7

-

Percent change from corresponding quarter of previous year
• ' • • '• • •'•
0.9
3.8
-0.4
0.5
-1.3
4.2
0.6
0.5
0.7
5.3
1.0 '
4.9
-0.1
0.4
0.3
0.7
6.2
5.8
-0.6
6.2
-0.1 '.
0.2
-0.3
5.9

ANNUAL

0.2

0.4

0.2

5.4

0.0

5.2

1.4

3.8

I
II
III
IV

-0.2
-0.3
0.5
1.1

-2.3
-2.3
-1.2
-0.4

-2.1
-2.0
-1.6
-1.5

5.1
4.2
3.5
3.2

-0.2
-0.6
-0.4
0.3

5.4
4.6
3.0
2.1

1.5
1.9
3.0
3,5

4.0
3.6
3.0
.2.5

ANNUAL

0.2

-1.5

-1.7

3.9

-0.3

3.7

2.5

3.3

See footn otes following table 6.
r*re vised

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 and annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate
hours of labor input should be interpreted with caut ion . See NOTE, page 4.




Table 2. Nonfarm business sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, unit labor cost, and prices.
Year
and
quarter

Output per
hour of
all persons

Output

Hours
of all
persons

Compensation per
hour (1)

Real
compensation per
hour (2)

Unit
labor
cost

Unit nonlabor payments (3)

Implicit
price
deflator (4)

Indexes 1982-100

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

108.1
108.6
107.9
107.9

133.5
134.1
133,1
132.0

123.5
123.4
123.3
122.4

134.9
137.6
139.5
141.0

101.6
102.6
102.3
101.7

124.9
126.7
129.2
130.7

138.4
139.0
138.4
138.7

129.2
130,6
132.2
133.3

ANNUAL

108.1

133.2

123.1

138.3

102.1

127.9

138.6

131.3

I
II
III
IV

107.9
108.4
108.6
108.9

130.4
130.9
131.4
131.4

120.9
120.8
121.0
120.6

142.0
143.6
144.5
145.4

101.5
102.1
102.1
101.9

131.6
132.5
133.1
133.5

141.8
142.5
143.4
144.1

134.9
135.7
136.4
136.9

ANNUAL

108.4

131.0

120.3

143.8

101.9

132,7

142.9

136.0

Percent change from previous quarter at annual rate (5)

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

1.0
2.1
-2,5
-0.3

2.7
1.8
-3.0
-3.1

1.8
-0.3
-0.5
-2.8

6.0
8.1
5.6
4.4

-1.3
4.1
-1.2
-2.4

5.0
5.9
8.4
4,7

1.7
1,8
-1,7
1.0

3.8
4.5
4,8
3.4

ANNUAL

-0.1

0.3

0.3

5.2

-0.2

5.3

1.5

3.9

I
II
III
IV

0.1
1.9
0.9
1.1

-4.9
1.6
1.6
0.0

-4.9
-0.3
0.7
-1.1

2.7
4.6
2.7
2.4

-0.8
2.5
-0.3r
-0.7

2.7
2.6
1.8r
1.3

9,0
2.1
2.5r
1.9

4.8
2.5
2.1
1.5

ANNUAL

0.2

-1,6

-1.8

4-0

-0.2

3.7

3.1

3.5

Percent change from corresponding quarter of previous year

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

-0.7
0.4
0.1
0.0

0.4
1.0
0.2
-0.4

1.0
0.6
0.1
-0.5

3.5
5.2
6.1
6.0

-1.6
0.6
0.5
-0.2

4.2
4.9
6.0
6.0

2.9
1,6
0.8
0.7

3.8
3.7
4.2
4.1

ANNUAL

-0.1

0.3

0.3

5.2

-0.2

5,3

1.5

3.9

I
II
III
IV

-0,2
-0^2
0.6
1.0

-2.3
-2.4
-1.2
-0.5

-2.2
-2.2
-1.9
-1.*

5.2
4.3
3.6
3.1

-0.1
-0.5
-0.3
0.2

5.4
4.6
3.0
2.1

2.4
2.5
3.6
3.8

4.4
3.9
3.2
2.7

ANNUAL

0.2

-1.6

-4.8

4.0

-0.2

3.7

3.1

3.5

See footnotes following table 6.
r-revised

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 and annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate
hours of labor input should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.




10

Table 3. Manufacturing sector: Productivity* hourly compensation, and unit labor cost,
seasonally adjusted
Year and
quarter

Output per
hour
of all persons

Output
(6)

Hours
of all
persons

Compensation per
hour(l)

Real
compensation per
hour (2)

Unit
labor
cost

Indexes 1982-100

IV

124. Ir
125. Ir
126. 6r
126. 4r

134. Ir
135. 4r
136. 6r
133 . 9r

108. Ir
108. 3r
107. 7r
105. 9r

131. 3r
133. 6r
134.9r
137. Or

98. 9r
99. 6r
99. Or
98. 8r

105. 9r
106. 8r
106. 4r
108. 4r

ANNUAL

125. 7r

135. Or

107. 4r

134. 3r

99. 2r

106.9r

I
II
III
IV

126. Or
127. Ir.
128. 4r
128.8

130. 3r
131.0r
133.2r
133.5

103. 4r
103. Or
103. 8r
103.6

138. 2r
139. 7r
140. 4r
141.8

98. 8r
99.3r
99. Ir
99.3

109. 7r
109. 9r
109. 4r
110.1

127.5

132.0

103.5

139.9

99.1

109.8

I
II
III

1990
'

1991

ANNUAL

Percent change from previous quarter at annual rate (5)
1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

4.3
3.3r
5.6r
-l.lr

1.9r
4. Or
3.4r
-7.6r

-2.4
0.6
-2.1
-6.6

4.9
7.2
4.0
6.5

-2.4
3.2
-2.7
-0.5

0.5r
3.8r
-1.6
7.6r

ANNUAL

2.5r

0.3r

-2.2

5.3

-0.1

2.7

I
II
III
IV

-1.5r
3.7
4. Or
1.5

-10. 5r
2.2
7.1r
0.8

3.3
4.4
2.2
4.0

-0.2
2.2
-0.8r
0.8

4.9r
0.7
-1.7
2.5

1.4

-2.2

-9.1
-1.4
3.0
-0-7
-3.6

4.2

0.0

2.7

- • ANNUAL

Percent change from corresponding quarter of previous year
1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

1.2r
1.7r
3.8
3.0

-0.9r
0.2
1.8
0.3r

-2.1
-1.6
-1.9
-2.6

3.9
5.7
5.6
5.6

-1.2
1.1
0.0
-0.6

2.7r
3.9r
1.7
2.5r

ANNUAL

2.5r

0.3r

-2.2

5.3

-0.1

2.7

I
II
III
IV

1.5r
1.6r
1.2r
1.9

-2.9r
-3.3r
-2.5r
-0.3

-4.4
-4.9
-3.6
-2.2

5.2
4.5
4.1
3.5

-0.1
-0.3
0.2
0.5

3.6
2.9
2.8
1.5

-2.2

-3.6

4.2

0.0

2.7

I-4
See footnotes following table 6.
r-revised
ANNUAL




February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 and annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate
hours of labor input should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.

11
Table 4, Durable manufacturing sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, and unit labor cost.
seasonally adjusted
Real
Unit
Hours
CompensacompensaOutput
Output per
Year and
labor
of all
tion per
tion per
<6J
hour
quarter
cost
persons
hour<l)
hour (2)
of all persons
Indexes 1982*100

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

132. 4r
134. 8r
137. 4r
136. 3r

143. 2r
145. 7r
147. 3r
142. 6r

108. Ir
108. Ir
107. 2r
104. 6r

129. 3r
131. 6r
132. 9r
135. 3r

97. 4r
98. Ir
97. 5r
97. 6r

97. 7r
97. 6r
96. 7r
99. 2r

ANNUAL

135. 4r

144. 7r

106.9r

132. 4r

97. 8r

97. 8r

I
II
III
IV

135 .Tr
136. 8r
138, Ir
138.4

137. 6r
138. 3r
140. 2r
139.7

101. 4r
101. Ir
101. 5r
101.0

136. 4r
137. 9r
138. 9r
140.7

97. 5r
98. Ir
98. Ir
98.6

100. 5r
100. 9r
100. 6r
101.7

137.1

139.0

138.4

98.1

100.9

ANNUAL

U01.3

Percent change from previous quarter at annual rate (5)

1990

I
II
III
IV
ANNUAL

1991

4.9
7.5
8.0
-3.1

3.7r

1.6
7.3
4.3
-12.1

0.2r

-3.1
-0.1
-3.4
-9.2

3.9
7.2
4.2
7.2

-3.3
3.2
-2.5
0.2

-0.9
-0.2
-3.5
10.7

-3.4

5.5

0.1

1.7

1
II
III
IV

-1.8
3.2
3.8
1.1

-13.3
2.2
5.5
-1.2

-11.7
-1.0
1.6
-2.3

3.4
4.6
2.8
5.4

-0.2
2.5
-0.2
2.2

5.3
1.4
-1.0
4.3

ANNUAL

1.3

-4.0

-5.2

4.5

0.3

3.2

Percent change from corresponding quart er of previous year

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

2.2r
2.8r
5.0
4.2

-1.4r
0.2r
2.0
0.0

-3.5
-2.6
-2.8
-4.0

4.1
6.0
5.7
5.6

-1.0
1.3
0.1
-0.6

l.Br
3.1r
0.7r
1.4

ANNUAL

3.7r

0.2r

-3.4

5.5

0.1

1.7

I
II
III
IV

2.5
1.4
0.5
1.5

-3.9
-5.1
-4.8
-2.0

-6.2
-6.4
-5.3
-3.5

5.5
4.8
4.5
4.0

0.2
0.0
0.6
1.1

2.9
3.3
4.0
2.5

ANNUAL

1.3

-4.0

-5.2

4.5

0.3

3.2

See footnotes following table 6.
r-revised

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 and annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate
hours of labor input should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.




12

Table 5. Nondurable manufacturing sector: Productivity, hourly compensation, and unit labor cost,
seasonally adjusted
Year and
quarter

Output per
hour
of all persons

Output
(6)

Hours
6£ all
persons

Compensat ion per
hour(l)

Real
compensat ion per
hour (2)

Unit
labor
cost

Indexes 1982=100

1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

114. Or
113. 3r
114. Or
114. 5r

123. 3r
123. Ir
123. 7r
123. 5r

108.1
108. 6r
108. 5r
107. 8r

134. 7r
137. 2r
138. 5r
140. 5r

101. 4r
102. 3r
101. 6r
101. 3r

118. 2r
121. Or
121. 5r
122. 6r

ANNUAL

114. Or

123.4r

108. 2r

137. 7r

101. 7r

120. 8r

I
II
III
IV

114. 2r
115. 5r
116. 7r
117.3

121. 4r
122. Ir
124. 9r
126.0

106.3
105.7
107. Or
107.4

141. 8r
143. 2r
143. 7r
144.5

101. 4r
101. 9r
101. 5r
101.3

124. Ir
124. Or
12-3. 2 r
123.2

115.9

123.6

106.7

143.3

101.5

123.6

ANNUAL

Percent change from previous quarter at annual rate (5) .

1990

I
II
III
IV
ANNUAL

1991

I
II
III
IV
ANNUAL

1990

.,1-0 .•,•:,... .
-1.0
4.4
4.2r
2.1

2.3
-0.6
2.1
-0.9

-1.2
1.7
-0.2
-2.7

6.7
7.4
3.8
5.9

-0.7
3.3
-2.8
-1.0

3.0
9.8
1.5
3.9

0.6

-0.4

5.4

0.0

4.4r

-5.4
-2.1
4.9 - •
1.5

4.0
3.9
l.Sr
2.2

0.4
1.8
-1.4r
-0.9

5.1
-0.5
-2.6r
0.1

-0.2

2.3

-6.4
2.3
9.3r
3.6

0.2
-1.4
4.0
I-6
Percent change from corresponding quarter of previous year

-0.2r
0.2r
2.1r
1.4

-O.lr
0.2
l.Sr
0.7

ANNUAL

1.0

I
II
III
IV
ANNUAL

I
II
III

IV
1991

3.5
-2.2
2.3
1.9

0,1
-0.1
-0.6
-0.6

4.0
5.5
5.6
5.9

-1.1
0.9
0.1
-0.3

4.2r
5.3r
3.4
4.5

0.6

• -0.4

5.4

0.0

4.4r

0.2
1.9
2.3
2.4

-1.5
-0.8
0.9
2.0

-1.7
-2.6
-1.4
-0.3

5.3
4.4
3.8
2.9

0.0
-0.4
-O.lr
0.0

5.0
2.5
1.4r
0.5

777

0.2

-1.4

4.0

See footnotes following table 6.
r-revised

2.3
-0>2
February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 and annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate
hours of labor input should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.




13

Table $. Nonfinancial corporations: Productivity, hourly compensation, unit labor cost, unit profits.
and prices, seasonally adjusted
Year
and
quarter

Output
per allemployee
hour

Output

Real
Employee Hourly
hours compensa- hourly
tion
compen(1)
sation<2)

Unit
labor
cost

Unit
nonlabor
cost (7)

Total
unit
cost
(8)

Unit
profits
(9)

Implicit
price
deflator
(4)

Indexes 1982-100
1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

110.3
111.3
110.2
111.0

135.9
136.9
135.4
134.7

123.2
123.0
122.8
121.4

132.6
135.4
137.3
138.7

99.9
101.0
100.7
100.1

120.3
121.7
124.6
125.0

115.0
115.1
118.1
120.5

118.8
119.8
122.8
123.7

161.6
163.6
138.7
128.7

121.4
122.5
123.7
124.0

ANNUAL

110.7

135.7

122.6

136.1

100.5

122.9

117.1

121.3

148.2

122.9

I
II
III

111.3
112.1
112.6

133.3
134.0
134.8

119.7
119.5
119.7

139,7
141.2
142.1

99.9
100.4
100.3

125.4
125.9
126.2

123.7
123.4
124.1

124.9
125.2
125.6

130.9
138.2
136.7

125.3
126.0
126.3

Percent change from previous quarter at annual rate (5)
1990

1991

I
II
III
IV

0.1
3.7
-3.9
2.8

0.7
3.2
-4.5
-1.9

0.6
-0.4
-0.6
-4.5

4.9
8.7
5.6
4.3

-2.3
4.6
-1.2
-2:5

4.8
4.8
9.9
1.5

2.0
0.3
11.1
8.1

4.0
3.6
10.2
3.2

-0,3
5.0
-48.3
-26.0

3.6
3.7
4.1
1.0

ANNUAL

0.0

0.1

0.1

5.2

-0.2

5.1

4.6

5.0

-14.1.

3.3

I
II
III

1.4
2.9
1.7

-4.3
2.1
2.5

-5.6
-0.8
0.8

2.7
4.4
2.6

-0.8
2.3
-0.4

1.3
1.5
0.9

11.2
-1.1
2.4

4.0
0.8
1.3

7.0
24.4
-4.2

4.2
2.2
0.9

Percent change from corresponding quarter
1990

1991

of previous year

I
II
III
IV

-0.8
0.6
-0.2
0.6

0.2
1.1
-0.3
-0.7

1.0
0.4
-0.1
-1.3

3.5
5.4
6.1
5.8

-1.6
0.7
0.6
-0.4

4.3
4.7
6.4
5.2

5.8
3.5
4.1
5.3

4.7
4.4
5.8
5.2

-8.7
-8.4
-19.8
-20.4

3.4
3.2
3.5
3.1

ANNUAL

0.0

0.1

0.1

5.2

-0.2

5.1

4.6

5.0

-14.1

3.3

0.9
0.8
2.2

-1.9
-2.2
-0.4

-2.8
-2.9
-2.6

5.3
4.2
3.5

0.0
-0.6
-0.4

4.3
3.5
1.3

7.6
7.2
5.0

5.2
4.5
2.3

-19.0
-15.5
-1.4

3.2
2.8
2.0

I
II
lit.

See footnotes following table 6.
r-revised

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

First quarter 1991 movements in measures which incorporate hours of labor input
should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.




14

SOURCE: Output data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of
Commerce, and the Federal Reserve Board. Compensation and hours data from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, and the Bureau of
Economic Analysis.
RELIABILITY: Productivity and cost measures are regularly revised as more
complete information becomes available. The measures are first published 30
days after the close of the reference period; revisions appear 30 days later,
and third revisions after an additional 60 days. In the business sector, the
probability is 0.95 that the third publication (third revision) of a quarterly
index of output per hour of all persons will differ from the initial value by
between -1.8 and +2.1 index points. This interval is based on the performance
of this measure between the second quarter of 1976 and the third quarter of
1990.
Footnotes, Tables 1-6
(1) Wages and salaries of employees plus employers1 contributions ftfr social
insurance and private benefit plans. Except for nonfinancial
corporations, where there are no self-employed,- data also include an
estimate of wages, salaries, and supplemental payments for the selfemployed.
(2) Compensation per hour adjusted for changes in the Consumer Price Index
for All Urban Consumers.
(3) Unit nonlabor payments include profits, capital consumption allowances,
interest, rental income of persons, and indirect taxes.
(4) Current dollar gross product divided by constant dollar gross product*
(5) Quarterly changes: Percent change compounded at annual rate from the
original data rather than index numbers* Annual changes: Percent
change between annual average levels*
(6) Quarterly manufacturing output measures are based on the index of
industrial production prepared monthly by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve adjusted by BLS to annual manufacturing output levels
(gross product originating) from the National Income and Product
Accounts prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S.
Department of Commerce.
(7) Unit nonlabor cost includes capital consumption allowances, interest,
rental income of persons, and indirect taxes. For nonfinancial
corporations, rental income of persons is zero by definition.
(8) Total unit cost is the sum of labor and nonlabor costs.
(9) Unit profits include corporate profits with inventory valuation and
capital consumption adjustments.




15

Appendix table 1. Manufacturing sector: Productivity/ hourly compensation. and unit labor cost
Indexes 1982-100
Year

Output per
hour
of all persons

Output
(6)

Hours
of all
persons

Compensation per
hour(l)

Real
compensation per
hour (2.)

Unit
labor
cost

1977
1978
197?

98.0
97.4
96.2

106.3
110.2
111.0

108.6
113.1
115.3

62.6
67.7
74.2

99.8
100.2
98.7

64.0
69.5
77.1

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984

94.4
96.4
100.0
102.9
105.6

103.8
105.3
100.0
104.0
113.8

109.9
109.3
100.0
101.2
107.8

83.1
91.4
100.0
102.5
105.7

97.4
97.0
100.0
99.3
98.1

88.1
94.8
100.0
99.6
100.1

1985
1986
1987
1988
1989

108.0
112.6
117.2
122.0
122.5

115.5
118.8
124.6
133.4
134.6

107.0
105.4
106.2
109.4
109.8

111.0
115.4
118.0
122.6
127.5

99.5
101.7
100.2
100.0
99.2

102.8
102.5
100.7
100.5
104.0

1990
1991

125.7
127.5

135.0
132.0

107.4
103.5

134.3
139.9

99.2
99.1

106.9
109.8

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

See' footnotes following table 6.

Annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate hours of labor input
should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.

Appendix table 2. Durable manufacturing sector; Productivity, hourly compensation,
and unit labor cost
Indexes 1982-100
Real
compensation per
hour (2)

Year

Output per
hour
of all persons

Output
(6)

Hours
of all
persons

1977
1978
1979

104.2
102.4
100.2

114.0
118.7
119.7

109.4
115.9
119.5

62.7
67.4
73.9

99.9
99.8
98,2

60.2
65.8
73.7

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984

98.3
98.7
100.0
102.4
107.7

110.4
110.0
100.0
103.1
118.0

112.4
111.5
100.0
100.6
109.6

83.1
91.5
100.0
101.9
104.6

97.3
97.1
100.0
98.7
97.2

84 .«
92.7
100.0
99.5
97.1

1985
1986
1987
1988
1989

109.8
115.1
121.5
128.3
130.6

120.3
122.8
129.4
141.9
144.4

109.5
106.7
106.5
110.6
110.6

109.9
114.9
116.8
120.4
125.5

98.5
101.2
99.2
98.2
97.7

100.0
99.8
96.2
93.8
96.1

1990
1991

135.4
137.1

144.7
139.0

106.9
101.3

132.4
138.4

97.8
98.1

97.8
100.9

See footnotes following table 6.




Compensation per
hour(l)

Unit
labor
cost

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate hours of labor input
should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.

16

Appendi* tab!* 3* nondurable manufacturing sector: Productivity,
•nd unit labor cost
Ind*M«« 1912-100
Y«*r

Output per
hour
of all person*

Hours
of all
persons

97.1
99.9
100.5

107.3
109.1
109.4

62.3
67.7
74.1

99.3
100.2
98.5

68.9
73.9
80.7

82,6
90.7
100.0
103.6
107.0

96.8
96.3
100.0
100.4
99.4

91.9
96.6
100.0
100.3
103.6

112.3
116.0
120.0
126.1
130.7

100.7
102.1
102.0
102.9
101.7

105.7
105.6
107.0
110.2
115.8

137.7
143.3

101.7
101.5

120.8
123.6

90.5
91.1
91.8

1910
1911

69.9
93*9

95.7
99. €

1M2

100*0

103. a

1914

103.3

100.0
105.2
108.6

106.5
106.1
100.0
101.9
105.2

1985
1916
1911
1911
1919

106.2
109.9
112,2
114.5
112.9

109.8
113.9
116. 8
123.2
122.7

103.4
103.7
105.9
107.6
108.7

1990
1991

114.0
115.9

123.4
123.6

See footnotes following table 6.




Real
compensation per
hour (2)

Output
(€)

1977
1171
1979

19$3

hourly compensation,

,

•

108.2
106.7

Compensation per
hour(l)

,

Unit
labor
cost

February 5, 1992
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual 1991 movements in measures which incorporate hours of labor input
should be interpreted with caution. See NOTE, page 4.