The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ROYAL M EEK ER, Commissioner BULLETIN OF TH E UNITED STATES \ BU R E A U O F L A B O R S T A T I S T I C S / WORKMEN’S INSURANCE AND * * * ’ A T ^ O C ZA IN U . £ O t : COMPENSATION SERIES PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF I N D U S T R I A L A C C I D E N T BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS HELD AT M AD ISO N , W IS. SEPTEMBER 2 4 - 2 7 , 1918 O CTO BER , 1919 W ASHINGTON GO VERNM ENT PRINTING O FFIC E 1919 A D D IT IO N A L COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 15 CENTS PE R COPY V CONTENTS. Page. In tro d u ctio n ______________________________________________________________________ 7-13 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1918—AFTERNOON SESSION. I . Accident prevention. Chairman, Fred M . W ilc o x , President, I . A . I. A . B. C. Ohio’s plan o f reaching the employer through monthly statistical re ports : Em ile E. W atson, actuary, Ohio Industrial Com mission___________14-16 W hat W isconsin is doing to prevent industrial accid en ts: G. H. Ham brecht, chairman, W isconsin Industrial Commission___17-24 C alifornia’s accident prevention cam paign ; John R. Brownell, superintendent o f safety, C alifornia Industrial Accident Com mission____________________________________________ 25-28 W hat the New Y ork State Industrial Commission is doing to prevent acciden ts: James L. Gernon, first deputy commissioner, New Y ork State In dustrial Com mission_____________________________________________ 29-34 The vital im portance o f industrial-accident prevention in war tim e: Victor T. Noonan, director o f safety, Ohio Industrial Commission__ 35, 36 W hat Pennsylvania is doing to prevent a ccid e n ts: Robert D. Young, Pennsylvania Safety M an______________________ 37-40 W hat M assachusetts is doing to prevent accid en ts: W illiam W . Kennard, chairman, M assachusetts Industrial A cci dent B o a r d ______________________________________________________ 41, 42 Accident prevention in industries in O ntario: George A. Kingston, commissioner, W orkm en’s Compensation Board o f Ontario...______________________________________________ 43,44 W hat industrial com m issions can do to prevent acciden ts: -Sidney J. W illiams, manager, accident prevention division, Na tional Safety Council___________________________________________ _ 45-47 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1918-EVEN IN G SESSION. II . Administrative problems. Chairman, Charles S, Andrus, Illinois. Statistics as an aid in administration : W. H. Burhop, secretary, W isconsin Compensation Insurance B oard____________________________________________________________ 48-53 H ow should permanent partial disability be com pensated: John Mitchell, chairman, New York State Industrial Commission__54-59 " Arising out o f and in course o f employment ” : George A. Kingston, commissioner. W orkm en’s Compensation Board o f O ntario________________________________________________ 60-72 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1918—MORNING SESSION. Business meeting. Chairman, Fred M. W ilcox , President, I . A . I. A . B. C. Report o f the secretary-treasurer______ ,______________________________ 73-83 Financial statem en t_______________________________________________ 81-83 Reports o f committees_________________________________________________ 83-106 Report o f committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost__83-106 Election o f officers___________________________________________________ 106 Resolutions__________________________*_____________ _____ ____________ 106-108 3 4 CONTENTS. W E D N E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 25, 1918—A F T E R N O O N S E SSIO N . V isits to Gisholt plant and other industrial establishments___________________________ Page. jQ g W E D N E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 25, 1918— E V E N I N G S E S S IO N . I I I . Statistical session. Chairman, H arry A . Mackey, Pennsylvania. Am ount o f exposure as fundamental in accident stu d y : Lucian W . Chaney, special agent, United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics_______________________________________________________ 109-116 W hy tabulate noncompensated a ccid en ts: L. W . Hatch, chief statistician, New Y ork State Industrial Com mission__________________________________________________________ 117-125 The use o f standard accident and compensation ta b les: W . H. Burhop, secretary, W isconsin Compensation Insurance B oa rd ___________________________________________________________ 126-132 T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 26, 1918— M O R N I N G S E S S IO N . I V . Medical session. Chairman, Charles H . Lemon, M . D., Wisconsin. Should medical service be lim ited in compensation c a s e s : Charles H. Lemon, M. D., M ilwaukee, W is_______________________ 133-139 Better treatment fo r industrial accident ca se s: M aj. P. B. Magnuson, Office o f the Surgeon General, W a r D epart ment, W ashington, D. C_______________________________________ 140-146 Surgical treatment to prevent and minimize permanent d isab ilities: Francis D. Donogliue, M. D., m edical adviser, Industrial Accident Board o f M assachusetts______________________________________ 147-151 Should m edical service be lim ited in compensation c a s e s : Frederic M. W illiams, commissioner, Connecticut W orkm en’ s Compensation Commission_____________________________________ 152,153 Should medical services be limited in compensation ca se s: Raphael Lewy, M. D., chief medical examiner, New York State 154 Industrial C om m ission _________________________________________ T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 26, 1918— A F T E R N O O N S E S S IO N . Chairman, 0 . J. Fay, M. D., Iowa. The compensation o f disability due to preexisting disease, aggravated or accelerated by accident or in ju r y : Meyer Lissner, member, C alifornia Industrial Accident Commis sion____________________________________________________________ 155-1S4 How medical questions are handled under the w orkm en’s compensa tion act in the State o f W ashington : J. W. Brislaw n, Industrial Insurance Commissioner o f W ash ington___________________________________________________________ 185-188 H ow medical questions are handled under compensation act in Massa chusetts : W illiam W . Kennard, chairman, Massachusetts Industrial A cci dent B o a r d _____________________________________________________ 189-191 H ow medical questions are handled under compensation law in New York State: W illiam C. Archer, deputy commissioner in charge o f New Y ork State Bureau o f W orkm en’s Compensation____________________ 192-194 The need o f medical statistics for compensation pu rposes: F. H. Thompson, M. D., ch ief medical examiner, Oregon Indus trial Accident Commission_____________________________________ 195,196 CONTENTS. 5 T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 26, 1918—E V E N I N G S E S S IO N . Chairman, F. D. Donoghue, M. D., Massachusetts. Selection o f the physician under compensation la w s : rage. John W . Mowell, M. D., medical adviser to the Industrial Insur ance Commission o f the State o f W ashington and chairm an o f the State M edical A id B oard_________________________________ 197-109 Selection o f the physician in compensation c a se s: Raphael Lewy, M. D., chief medical examiner, New Y ork State In dustrial Com mission_____________________________________________ 200 F R I D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 27 , 1918— M O R N I N G S E S S IO N . Rehabilitation. Chairman, Fred M. W ilcox , President, I. A . I. A . B. C. H ow to deal with crippled w ork ers: T. Norman Dean, statistician, W orkm en’s Compensation Board o f O n tario____________________________________________________ 201-206 Conservation o f man pow er and rehabilitation o f the industrially d is abled : Lieut. Col. H arry E. Mock, M. C_____________________________ 207-211 Problem o f the crippled man in in d u stry : Carl Hookstadt, expert, United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics 212-224 BULLETIN OF THE U. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. no. 264. WASHINGTON. October. 1919. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTER NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, MADISON, WIS, SEPTEMBER 24-27, 1918. [The present bulletin contains only those papers which were pre pared for the conference and submitted to the Bureau. No steno graphic report of the proceedings has been received by the Bureau o f Labor Statistics for publication. The following introduction gives a summary account o f the papers, discussions, and activities o f the conference.] IN T R O D U C T IO N . The International Association o f Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions held its fifth annual meeting September 24-27, 1918, at Madison, Wis. Seventeen States, two Provinces of Canada, and five Federal departments were represented. The last named included the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics, United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, Federal Board for Vocational Education, Bureau o f Standards, and the Surgeon General’s Office o f the W ar Department. An address of welcome was delivered by the Hon. Emanuel L. Philipp, Governor of Wisconsin. The discussion centered about five main subjects: Accident pre vention; methods o f compensating for partial disabilities; statistics and statistical methods as an aid in efficient administration; medical problems, including the method of selecting physicians; and the problem o f rehabilitation and retraining. In his presidential address, Mr. Fred M. W ilcox, o f the Wisconsin Industrial Commission, emphasized the necessity o f greater uniform ity in compensation practices, especially as regards partial disa bility schedules. He also advocated unlimited medical and hospital treatment, urged the adoption o f State compensation insurance, and emphasized the importance o f closer personal supervision o f acci dent cases. 7 8 INTRODUCTION. The opening session o f the convention was devoted to brief State reports on important legislative and administrative developments during the year. An important instance of effective cooperation was given by Mr. J. L. Gernon, first deputy commissioner of the New York State Industrial Commission. A great many of the small employers subject to the compensation act in New York had not in sured in accordance with the law, and it had been practically im possible for the commission to canvass the entire State for violations of this sort. Now one o f the duties o f the factory inspectors is to inquire whether employers are insured under the compensation act. Violations are reported to the compensation bureau and then prose cuted. Mr. F. W. Armstrong, of Nova Scotia, stated that 75 per cent o f the troubles o f compensation commissions would be elimi nated if an exclusive State fund were substituted for private casualty companies. He also advised strongly against payment of compensa tion benefits in lump sums, stating that 90 per cent o f such lump sum payments are actually wasted. ACCIDENT PREVENTION*. The entrance o f large numbers of women into war industries has necessitated a change in the character o f accident prevention meth ods. Machines and processes not particularly hazardous Avhen men are employed become so when such machines are operated by woman. Even the mechanical safeguards themselves, installed primarily for the protection of male employees, are a source of danger to women workers. Another prolific source of accidents, as pointed out by Mr. Gernon, o f New York, is the lack o f proper instruction in the use or technique o f tools. The greater liability to accident of the inexperienced or “ green ” employee is due not to his carelessness but to his ignorance o f the proper methods of performing his work. This unfamiliarity has become a very potent factor in view o f the present large labor turnover and the employment of thousands o f new and inexperienced workers. Some o f the accident prevention methods found effective in the various States were discussed at the conference. The more salient features are shown in the following summaries of-the papers read. Mr. Emile E. Watson, actuary o f the Industrial Commission o f Ohio, presented the plan in effect in that State. An account o f the safety work in Wisconsin was given by Mr. G. H. Hambrecht, chairman of the Wisconsin Industrial Commis sion. One method o f interesting employers in inaugurating inten sive safety campaigns is to study the accident experience in *thfc®£ f plants and furnish the deputies with this data. The compensation INTRODUCTION. 9 law itself is an aid to the safety movement. When an injury is due to failure o f an employer to comply with any safety order the com^ pensation o f the injured is increased 15 per cent, to be paid by the employer himself, and when an injury is due to violation of an order by the injured the employee’s compensation is reduced 15 per cent. Accidents are carefully investigated on this basis, and the result has been to create a demand for copies o f safety orders. The safety department o f the Industrial Accident Commission o f California, as outlined by Mr. J. E. Brownell, superintendent o f safety, was organized in 1914 with a nucleus of safety engineers and now consists o f 22 members. The chief mine inspector is paid jointly by the Federal Government and the commission through an arrangement with the Federal Bureau o f Mines, by wThich he is also employed. The following accident prevention methods have been found useful: Development of safety organizations among employ ers; preparation and distribution of safety rules and orders; mass meetings and shop talks to employees; issuance of bulletins dealing with special hazards in different industries; a safety museum; and the publication o f a monthly safety news bulletin. Particular emphasis upon the necessity of instructing inexperienced employees in the use o f tools and methods w7as laid down by Mr. J. L. Gernon, o f the New York State Industrial Commission. He further stated that the inspection bureau is empowered to tag as unsafe machines which are dangerous and unguarded, and this has proved a most effective means of securing compliance with the orders issued. Considerable success has been achieved by the bureau in the policy o f requiring every inspector to report all installations of new machinery where the machinery itself is dangerous and the manufacturer has failed properly to safeguard it. When called to their attention the makers o f the machinery have in every instance signified their inten tion to remedy the defects and have cooperated with the bureau in an effort to make their machinery safe for the operator. Mr. Victor T. Noonan, director of safety of Ohio, emphasized the human element in accident prevention work. The war, he said, had given the safety movement a much needed stimulus. Employers and w orkmen alike must consider it their patriotic duty to do every thing possible to prevent accidents. Mr. S. J. Williams, manager o f the accident prevention division o f the National Safety Council, spoke of the need of uniform safety standards. He stated that a proper balance between safeguarding and education should be maintained in any safety campaign, since evocation reduces accident frequency and safeguarding prevents many o f the more serious accidents. 10 INTRODUCTION. PARTIAL DISABILITY SCHEDULE. The formulation o f an adequate and just compensation schedule for partial disabilities is a problem which is still confronting every State legislature and compensation commission. X o two schedules are alike and none is adequate. This inadequacy is particularly noticeable as to foot and leg injuries. As was pointed out by Mr. Carl Hookstadt, o f the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, in every State compensation law the schedule provides smaller benefits fo r the loss o f the lower limbs than for the loss o f the upper limbs. Yet every investigation shows that from both the medical and eco nomic standpoint the loss o f the former are more severe than the loss o f the latter. On what basis permanent partial disability should be compensated was discussed in a paper prepared by Mr. John Mitchell, chairman of the Industrial Commission o f New York. He stated that in the ad ministration o f the NewT Y ork law consideration has been given to the vocational element to m odify the rigidity of the statute, in no case, however, diminishing the award on this account, but it might be advisable to allow a definite increase of, say, 33 J per cent for voca tional reasons alone. Under an amendment to the New York law com pensation for permanent total disability is awarded in cases in wThich the claimant loses a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye, having previously suffered the loss of one or more such members. The totality is no more chargeable to the last accident than to the first. The proper way to handle such a matter would seem to be to charge the present employer with the result o f the last accident and to throw the combination re sult o f the totality upon the industry as a whole. This may be done by adding a small additional rate upon each risk or by collecting, as New York has done, in each death case in which there are no depend ents, a fixed sum o f $100, which contribution has been sufficient to establish a fund to take care of the permanent total cases. This has done away with the objection o f employers to employing or reemploying crippled or defective workmen. The statutory method of providing for permanent partial disabili ties not included in the schedule is to pay two-thirds of' the difference between the old and the new wages, but the administration difficulties are numerous. The claimant may refuse to return to w ork; changed industrial conditions may cause the claimant to earn more or less than he earned at the time o f the accident; the claimant may experience intermittent employment— sometimes employed and sometimes not. The method followed in New York in such cases is to allow the work man and the employer (or his insurance carrier) to present theiJlselVes before the commission with a proposition to adjudicate compensation by a single payment commuting all future payments. More than INTRODUCTION. 11 5,000 such cases a year are thus adjusted. The chief defects of such a plan are (1) the danger of introducing the “ settlement,” so called, in ■which the obnoxious element o f the old plan may be perpetuated and (2) the danger which always attends the giving o f compensation in a lump sum against which is the general tendency of compensation laws. The first objection is entirely avoided by the commission’s active in terest in every case. The second defect is overcome largely by ordering partial payments o f the lump sum to be made periodically where there is indication that it otherwise might be wasted. STATISTICAXi METHODS. Mr. W , H. Burhop, o f the Wisconsin Compensation Insurance Board, discussed the standard accident and compensation tables used by the industrial commission, and pointed out the importance o f proper statistics as an aid in administration. The paper o f Mr. L. W. Chaney, o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics, emphasized the need o f information as to exposure in the determination o f relative industrial hazards. Accident rates always have significance as disclosing prevalence^ while in the matter of hazard the significance is slight in extended groups such as the entire State, but steadily increases as it narrows to industries, de partments, and finally to occupations. Mr. Chaney also discussed the several methods which may be adopted to ascertain the amount o f exposure in any industry, the most accurate method being the uso o f actual hours as recorded by time clocks. Mr. L. W . Hatch, chief statistician o f the New York State Indus trial Commission, in his discussion o f noncompensable accidents stated that while such accidents should be reported, very little could be gained by tabulating them. The results obtained would not be com mensurate with the great labor and cost involved. MEDICAL SERVICE. The medical session proved to be one of the most spirited and. interesting features o f the convention. A description of the medical administration and practices in each State opened the session. Every speaker emphasized the importance o f medical and surgical treat ment which was unlimited both as regards time and amount. Noth ing short o f this was held to be adequate. T oo great a tendency on the part o f employers and insurance carriers to select cheap and in competent physicians was also pointed out. The practices o f many o f the contract doctors were especially condemned b y Maj. P. B. Magnuson, o f the Surgeon General’s Office, and by Dr. C. H. Lemon, o f Milwaukee. On the other hand, as pointed out by Dr. J. W . Mowell, o f the State Medical Aid Board o f Washington, selection of physicians by employees results in selection of incompetents in a large proper- 12 INTRODUCTION. tion o f cases. Supervision by State industrial commissions over tlie selection of physicians was suggested as the best way out o f the diffi cult problem. The invaluable aid medical advisers render to compensation com missions was generally recognized and emphasized. Not only do they advise the commissioners on technical medical problems, but they are especially qualified to select the impartial examining phy sicians. A valuable paper on how to prevent and minimize perma nent disabilities of the hand was read by Dr. F. D. Donoghue. The long period o f disability resulting from hand injuries, Dr. Donoghue stated, was due largely to neglect or improper treatment. Valuable papers were also read by Mr. Meyer Lissner, of the California In dustrial Accident Commission, on preexisting disease aggravated by accident, and by Mr. Geo. A. Kingston, o f the Ontario’ Workmen’s Compensation Board, on the interpretation of injuries 64arising out o f and in course of employment.” r e h a b il it a t io n . A discussion of rehabilitation problems closed the convention. Mr. T. N. Dean, statistician o f the Workmen’s Compensation Board o f Ontario, spoke of the importance of rehabilitating industrial cripples and stressed the desirability o f prompt action. Mr. Carl Hookstadt, o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics, outlined the actual industrial problem, as disclosed by several investigations, confronting workmen permanently injured in industry. He pointed out that the present industrial handicap o f a workman who sustains a major limb injury is a serious one. The period o f total disability resulting from the injury is unnecessarily long. Only about onethird of the seriously crippled workers return to the same employer and relatively few reenter the same occupation. The compensation benefits are inadequate and practically no retraining has been done. Mr. B. M. Little, former chairman o f the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, outlined the history and progress of Federal rehabilitation legislation as regards both military and indus trial cripples. He urged specifically that the association support the pending Smith-Bankhead bill providing for the rehabilitation of industrial cripples under the supervision and administration of the Federal Board for Vocational Education. Resolutions were adopted by the association approving the principle o f the Smith-Bankhead bills and authorizing the president to appoint a committee to further State and Federal legislation along lines outlined in the said bills. BUSINESS SESSION. The following officers for the ensuing year were elected: President, George A. Kingston, commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation Board o f Ontario, Canada; vice president, W ill J. French, member of the INTRODUCTION. 13 Industrial Accident Commission of California; secretary-treasurer, Royal Meeker, United States Commissioner of Labor Statistics, Washington, D. C. Reports were made by the secretary-treasurer, by the committee on jurisdictional conflicts, and by the committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost. Among the resolutions adopted was one authorizing the executive committee to confer with the executive committee of the Association of Government Labor Officials o f the United States and Canada as to the advisability o f the consolidation of the twTo organizations. The executive commit tee was authorized to cooperate with the Federal Bureau of Stand ards in formulating a uniform safety code, and to study the question o f uniformity in State compensation laws. TU ESD AY, SEPTE M BE R 2 i —A F T E R N O O N SESSION. CHAIRMAN, FRED M . W ILCOX, PRESIDENT, I. A . I . A. B. C. I. ACCIDENT PREVENTION, O H IO ’ S P L A N O F R E A C H IN G T H E E M P L O Y E R T H R O U G H M O N T H L Y S T A T IS T IC A L R E P O R T S . B Y E M IL E E. W A T S O N , A C T U A R Y , O H IO IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N . Our monthly statistical report plan comprises hut one phase o f a broader plan, the great function o f which is intended to create that condition which will bring about a maximum reduction in industrial accidents in Ohio. W ith this statement in mind the initial part o f this paper will be strictly confined to the subject assigned. Statistically speaking, an industrial accident for actuarial needs is inherently different from an industrial accident for accident preven tion needs. To serve actuarial needs, an industrial accident must have a matured value. To possess a matured value, an important percentage o f accidents require a considerable exposure o f time be yond the date on wThich the accident occurred. In consequence, actuarial needs demand that statistical compilations for actuarial purposes be made considerably beyond the date of the year for which the compilation was made. This delay, however, is violently destructive considered from the viewpoint o f accident prevention needs. In the first place, it will permit o f the prolonged continuance o f a destructive physical or moral hazard constituting the direct source of a prolific number o f accidents. In the second place, the tendency o f a corrective practice ultimately to start operation independent of external action, means, in a large percentage of cases, that the delay forced by actuarial needs will find an entirely different set of conditions existing than were present at the time o f the occurrence o f the accident, in the event the attempt is made to use actuarial statistics for accident pre vention purposes. To-day, when industries are so rapidly changing the nature, char acter, and finished product o f their operations, and on such a large scale, this delay is incomparably more destructive than ever before. Stated concisely, the proper conservation o f accident prevention and actuarial statistical needs demands that industrial accidents be reduced to two points o f control—one instantaneous, the other ulti mate ; the former being concurrent with the date of the reporting of the occurrence o f the accident, the other concurrent with the date 14 O H IO 'S PLAN ---- EM ILE E. W ATSOK. 15 the accident lias reached its matured value. The latter will be of great constructive value to the former, but the former will be of no constructive value whatsoever to the latter. In the foregoing an effort has been made to explain the conditions which made the adopting of our monthly statistical reports a neces sity in order to reduce our problem to effective control. W e have tried diligently to make this work {our monthly statistical reports) a procedure as simple as possible. In its beginning we have taken only a selected number o f risks. It is our plan to extend this selec tion gradually until ultimately it will be a service universal to every employer o f the State. I consider it premature at this time to attempt to place a valuation upon this plan, though I have the profoundest confidence in the serv iceable and effective results it will obtain. The detailed procedure o f carrying out the plan is as follows: 1. The industrial accidents o f each selected employer are analyzed as o f the day the same are repQrted to the department, as to cause, nature, and as far as possible, extent o f disability. They are coded, thus being made ready for punching on the Hollerith cards. 2. These codes are then punched on the Hollerith cards. 3. A t the termination o f the month these accidents are sorted and tabulated by their respective risks. 4. The results of these tabulations are then carried to the monthly statistical report form. 5. Copies of these reports are placed in the hands of our safety engineers, workshop and factory inspectors, and the employer. Then correlating with the foregoing our merit-rating plan, wo feel that we have completed a cycle which is ultimately going to go far toward reducing the industrial accidents in Ohio to a*minimum. Suffice it to say that the employers5 insurance is renewed every six months. The employer is rated within his classification upon the basis of the experience he has produced. On renewal, if the em ployer finds he is penalized over his neighboring or competing em ployer within the same classification, he is always disappointed by reason o f two things: (1) The dollars and cents loss, represented not only by the penalization but also by the additional fact that this penalization in itself bars the employer receiving the same from any participation in the annual refund premium; (2) injuring of his pride, which is frequently the greatest cause of disappointment. The Ohio employers are now conversant with the merit-rating sys tem of the Ohio State Insurance Plan, and, when they get together and talk over the rates, it is a source of pride to every employer to be abl^ to say that he is getting the preferred rate and participation in the refund premium. 16 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. THE UNIQUE CORRELATION EXISTING BETWEEN OTJR MONTHLY STATIS TICAL REPORTS AND M ERIT RATING SYSTEM. In Ohio, there is. just one carrier o f workmen’s compensation in surance, viz, the Ohio State Insurance Plan. There is no switching from one insurance carrier to another. We have diligently developed the merit-rating system o f the Ohio State Insurance Plan to the specific end o f creating that condition which makes the prevention of every preventable accident the convenient and businesslike thing for every subscriber to the fund to accomplish, our aim being to make it just as economically necessary for the employers to safeguard against the occurrence of a preventable accident to just the same degree that he finds it eco nomically necessary to safeguard his raw material, machinery, equip ment, and finished product against injury or damage. It is hardly fitting to enter upon an analysis of the foregoing merit-rating system in this paper. The writer made such an analy sis in a paper read before the 1916 annual meeting o f this associa tion. Since then, this merit-rating system has undergone a consider able number of revisions, calculated to produce more effectively the results just recited. W H A T W IS C O N S IN IS D O IN G TO P R E V E N T IN D U S T R IA L A C C ID E N T S . B Y G. H . H A M B R E C H T , C H A IR M A N , W IS C O N S IN IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N . The Wisconsin Industrial Commission was organized seven years ago. From the very first, in formulating and carrying out its safety program, it has worked in the closest possible cooperation with the representatives of labor and the manufacturers. In its effort to be thoroughly efficient and practical in all of its requirements and methods, it has sought to do nothing on its own responsibility, but always to consult the interests concerned and, in cooperation with them, to work out standards along the lines of experience and good practice. Every one o f the safety orders now in force has been drafted by committees whose members are experts in the respective fields to which the orders apply. The personnel of the committees is made up o f representatives of the manufacturers and members appointed by the Federation of Labor, and it is by such practical men as these that the safety orders in every instance have been prepared and discussed before being adopted as administrative orders by the com mission. These special committees were continued after the orders were adopted and are looked upon by the commission as permanent ad visory committees to which the commission may turn for expert advice and technical information, and to which also may be referred difficult questions involving interpretation of the orders and their application under unusual circumstances. From the very first, also, the commission has endeavored to be of service to the manufacturers o f the State and their workmen by placing before them the best information attainable regarding safe guards and methods of accident prevention. Throughout the entire course o f development o f its safety work the commission has sought to impress upon the employers and workmen the fact that safety is neither philanthropy nor “ bunk,” but that it is a necessary feature of industrial organization and that there can be no efficiency without safety. The field inspectors have been practical men who have sought to do their work in a practical manner. In every case where a safeguard has been ordered they have been prepared to show that there was a real need for the guard. They have also been prepared to show the 1 2 4 2 4 7 °— 19------- 2 17 18 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. employer how to install every guard tliey have ordered. Nothing has been ordered in the way of safety devices unless it could be shown that the device required was thoroughly practical. This attitude on the part of the commission and the application of these methods by its field deputies, together with the great amount o f personal work done by the commissioners and inspectors in spread ing the gospel of safety, paved the way for the hearty cooperation which the employers of Wisconsin have given to the State in its accident-prevention campaign. Whatever success the safety move ment in Wisconsin has attained is due to this cooperation more than to anything else. T. GENERAL INSPECTION SERVICE. The safety and sanitation department of the Industrial Commis sion conducts the general faetory-inspection service and several specialized activities, such as building code administration, inspec tion o f steam boilers and refrigerating machinery, improvement of industrial lighting and enforcement of the lighting orders, and general fire prevention and inspection service. The orders which have been adopted by the commission form the basis upon which all inspections are made in places of employment and public buildings in the State. These orders are as follows: 1. General safety orders, applicable to m achinery and conditions in all plants. This group also includes a few special orders on paper m ills and w oodw orking plants. 2. General sanitation orders. 3. Laundry safety orders. 4. Elevator safety code. 5. Boiler safety code. 6. Orders on existing buildings. 7. B u ild in g code. 8. Building-construction sa fety orders. 9. Electrical safety code. 10. Lighting orders. 11. Fire-protection orders. 12. Refrigerating-m achinery safety orders. 13. General orders on zinc miners. The general factory-inspection service is conducted by a staff con sisting o f a chief safety engineer, an assistant, and eight field depu ties, each o f whom is assigned to a district. The duties o f the field deputies are to inspect places o f employment for the purpose o f en forcing the orders of the commission. In addition to the enforce ment o f these orders^ the deputies are also charged with the duty of enforcing the child-labor laws, enforcing laws regulating the hours o f employment for women, investigating serious accidents, and mak ing any special investigations within their districts which may be W H A T W ISCONSIN IS DOING-----G. H . HAM BRECHT. 19 necessary to facilitate the work o f other departments of the com mission. The attention given to safety by the field deputies has always been primarily educational in character. The commission lias never re garded that the work of the deputy w^as to enter a place for the pur pose o f finding points o f danger and recording them upon a certifi^cate o f inspection. On the contrary, the commission has required that its representatives in the field may be men o f considerable ex perience, well equipped for their work, and capable o f giving prac tical suggestions not only in regard to safety o f equipment, but more especially in regard to methods o f organizing and conducting safety campaigns in individual plants. It has held that the deputies’ chief function was to present safety work to the manufacturers and to the workmen in such a way that they will become interested and will appreciate its practical value from the standpoint o f efficiency. The deputy has been required, so to speak, to “ sell safety ” to the em ployer, the superintendent, the foreman, and all down the line. The inspector who found only half of the danger points in a factory but who stirred up interest in safety among the men in the plant and left the manufacturer with the right attitude toward the prob lem was considered successful. The deputy who found every exposed set screw and every open gear and made a careful tabulation o f every danger point in the place but who left the manufacturer indif ferent about safety was considered a failure. During the years 1915, 1916, and 1917, there were 40,980 accidents settled under compensation in this State. O f this number 7,789, or 19 per cent, were strictly machine accidents, such injuries as we may assume could have been prevented by mechanical safeguards. This, we believe, is just about as low a proportion o f machine accidents as any State with an equal amount o f manufacturing is able to show. The attention given to safeguarding in past years has borne fruit, and the factories throughout the State have been brought up to a high standard with respect to the safeguarding o f physical equip ment. Granted that the present improved conditions be maintained, it is not probable that increased attention to safeguarding will cause any notable effect in the reduction o f the present accident frequency rate. I f by such increased attention we should be able to cut down the machine accident rate 25 per cent, it would result in a decrease of less than 5 per cent o f all accidents occurring annually. The deputies therefore, while not neglecting the importance o f mechani cal safeguards, have found it advantageous to devote considerable time to the work o f assisting employers in reviving and developing safety organizations in their plants, and stimulating interest among the foremen and workmen by practical talks on safety whenever in spections are made. Occasionally, special meetings are arranged, at 20 ACCIDENT PEE VEXTIO X. which talks on unsafe practices are given in connection with slides or moving pictures. Many such meetings have been held with groups o f factory employees and with labor unions. -Also, the deputies in their contact with manufacturers endeavor to interest them in various phases o f industrial betterment work which are now generally recognized as having an important relation to the acci dent rate; such, for example, are an adequate and up-to-date firstaid room, an employment department, improved sanitation, lunch rooms, factory-training classes, instruction in English, etc. As a means o f reaching the foreman and helping the manufacturer in terest him, the commission began in June o f this year to issue a monthly safety magazine, which is sent to 5,000 foremen, at their residence addresses. Employers are also urged to become affiliated with the National Safety Council, and get the benefits which the splendid service of this organization is able to offer them. The safety educational service o f the commission is being gradually extended. Needless to state, such cooperation is greatly appreciated by both employer and employee. A method which has been found very helpful in interesting the manufacturer to inaugurate an intensive safety campaign in his shop is to make a study o f the accident experience o f the plant and place this in the hands o f the deputy. Employers are required by law to report to the commission all accidents causing disabilities of more than seven days. When a deputy is planning to get things started in a particular factory he is given data taken from these reports showing the number o f accidents in the plant within a given period, the department in which they occur, their causes, the char acter o f the injuries, and the cost in compensation and medical ex pense. He is thus armed with facts which not only give him a clear cut outline o f the problems which he wTill find in the plant, but also enable him to put up a strong argument to the employer on safety as an essential of business efficiency. Presenting an em ployer with a summary o f this kind has frequently had the effect o f surprise and sometimes a shock. It never fails to make an impres sion. In many instances it has been the means o f convincing him that it would be well to give closer attention to safety problems. In several instances it has resulted in the employment of a safety engineer on full time. The Wisconsin compensation act has a unique provision to the effect that when an injury is due to the failure o f an employer to comply with any safety order o f the commission the compensation o f the injured is to be increased 15 per cent. The additional com pensation must be paid by the employer and not by his insurance carrier. By the same provision the workman is under obligation to use the safety devices required by the orders, and if his injury W H A T W ISCONSIN IS DOING— G. H . HAM BRECHT. 21 is clue to willful refusal to use such safeguards, liis compensation is then decreased 15 per cent. It is one of the duties of the assistant to the engineer to read all accident reports with a view toward select ing for investigation such accidents as appear to have been due to violation o f the safety orders, following up the investigation and reporting to the compensation department whether the employer or the employee, as the case may be, should be held for the penalty. The enforcement of this provision has helped greatly to create a de mand for copies o f the State safety orders, and to bring forcibly to the attention o f the employer and employee.the necessity o f comply ing with the orders. The safety department has been endeavoring to work in close cooperation with the insurance companies and the Wisconsin Inspec tion and Eating Bureau, so that there will be as little confusion as possible in the matter o f standards to be followed by the employer. The deputies are familiar with the standards followed by these or ganizations and recommend to employers who are about to install safeguards that they design guards which will conform to the standard o f the rating bureau, in order that they may get the bene fit o f all possible rate reductions. An important step which has been taken recently by the safety department o f the commission is directed toward uniformity o f safety standards to be applied by the State inspectors, compensation insurance companies, and the rating bureau* Committees are now at work preparing uniform standards, which will no doubt be readily accepted and put into effect, with the result that confusion as to the requirements of these various agencies will be cleared away. During the past year the first industrial service conference given under the auspices o f the Wisconsin Industrial Commission and the Milwaukee Association o f Commerce was held in the city o f Mil waukee. The purpose of this conference was to bring home to the manufacturers, industrial service workers, and others present the most recent information and up-to-date thought on the subjects o f safety, sanitation, employment, hours o f labor in their relation to production, health conservation in industrial occupations, and other important topics bearing on the general problems of securing effi ciency in production and improving the relationship between capital and labor. The good results obtained from this conference are being followed up by deputies of the safety and sanitation department, who are assisting employers to establish the essential elements o f industrial service work in plants wherever such aid is requested. II. SPECIALIZED ACTIVITIES. B u i l d i n g c o d e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n .— A State building code containing the broad general requirements of fire protection, sanitation, and 22 ACCIDENT PREVENTION, structural safety was made effective in Wisconsin in October, 1914, The code affects all new construction and additions or alterations o f structures erected prior to that date, and applies to all buildings, ex cept private residences, flat buildings for not more than two families, buildings for agricultural purposes located outside of the corporate limits o f a city or town, and purely temporary buildings, such as sheds used in construction work. The code is administered by two State building inspectors in co operation with local officials, chiefly city building inspectors, and the chiefs o f local fire departments. The State inspector’s work con sists o f examination and approval o f plans submitted in advance o f building, field inspection during construction, and final inspection when a building is completed. The revised code, which is now being printed, requires that plans and specifications o f the following build ings shall be submitted to the commission for approval before con tracts are let, or work is commenced: Theaters and assembly h a lls ; schools, colleges, and a cad em ies; apartment houses, hotels, and places o f detention ; factories, offices, and mercantile build ings, as fo llo w s : (a ) All buiklings having floor or ro o f spans greater than SO fe e t; (b ) A ll buildings which are m ore than tw o stories h igh ; (c ) AH buildings which are tw o stories high and are m ore than 5,000 square feet in area at the second floor level. This branch o f the safety department also inspects and enforces the orders on existing buildings and the orders relating to the safety o f workmen engaged on construction work. The building depart ment from time to time has rendered service to a number o f munici palities in this State in drafting local building regulations and ordi nances relating to fire protection and fire prevention. Through the examination o f plans the inspectors have frequently been able to offer suggestions for improvement, often fo r lower cost than origi nally contemplated. Public addresses, newspaper articles, bulletins, and educational leaflets have been utilized by the members o f this department in giving publicity to the principles o f “ good building and safety. B o i l e r i n s p e c t i o n * — Nearly all o f the steam-boiler inspections in the State are made by inspectors in the employ o f insurance com panies and municipalities. Only about 2 per cent o f the boiler inspections are made directly by the State boiler inspector. The aims in this work have teen to eliminate duplicate inspections and to pro vide for thorough and efficient inspection service by the insurance companies and cities employing boiler inspectors. To accomplish these objects the industrial commission, through its boiler com mittee, has adopted as part o f its boiler code provisions regulating the inspection service conducted by private and municipal inspectors. W H A T W ISC O XSIK IS DOI3TG---- G. H . HAM BRECH T. 23 The chief duties o f the State boiler inspector are to prescribe ex aminations and to issue certificates o f competency to inspectors in the employ o f insurance companies and cities o f the first, second, and third classes; to receive, examine, and file reports o f their inspec tions; and to inspect all steam boilers which are not insured, which are not subject to municipal inspection, and which are not otherwise exempt from State regulation. In May o f this year a set of rules governing the installation and operation o f refrigerating machinery, which had been prepared by a special committee and discussed at a public hearing, were adopted by the commission. The enforcement of these orders has been made a part o f the duties o f the State boiler inspector. I n d u s t r i a l l i g h t i n g .— The Industrial Commission o f Wisconsin was perhaps the first State labor department to add an illuminating engineer to its staff of deputies. The commission has long recog nized the importance of good lighting as an aid in reducing acci dents and conserving eyesight, but it was not until the latter part o f 1916 that it became possible to put an expert into the field to assist the manufacturers in improving the lighting conditions in their shops and factories. The results already accomplished have been beneficial, not only to a large number o f workingmen, but em ployers also have gained thereby, because good lighting always makes for efficiency and increased production as well as safety. The principal duties of the illuminating engineer are as follow s: 1. Supervise lighting inspection in factories and all places o f employment. 2. Furnish plant managers inform ation regarding the best methods o f ob taining good industrial lighting. 3. Prepare bulletins to assist plant managers, engineers, architects, elec tricians, and others in conform ing w ith the State lighting orders. 4. Make lighting surveys and studies, to determine proper methods o f lighting to be recommended by the industrial commission for different industrial processes. 5. Supervise inspection o f electrical equipment for the purpose o f enforcing the State electrical safety code. 6. Investigate accidents caused by electricity. F i r e p r e v e n t i o n w o r k .— This branch of the safety department is in charge of a superintendent o f fire prevention. Its functions may be classified under the headings of fire prevention, fire protection, building improvement, and education, as follow s: A. Fire p reven tion : 1. Supervise inspection w ork o f all local fire departments, and receive and examine their records and quarterly reports. 2. Receive complaints o f dangerous conditions, and make inspections to enforce the State fire prevention orders. 3. Make original inspection o f conditions in 41 cities whose fire departments are not continuing an adequate inspection service. 24 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. A. Fire prevention— Concluded. 4. Issue orders to correct lire hazards. 3. To give special attention to the tire hazards existing in Hour mills, grain elevators, wholesale houses, warehouses, and food repositories, and to take necessary action to im prove conditions wherever this is found necessary. D uring the past year 1,730 reports of such hazards have been received and follow ed up, in cooperation w ith the State council of defense. B. F ire protection : 1. Assist local communities in organizing and reorganizing lire departments. 2. Investigate the adequacy o f local water and chem ical protection, equip ment, personnel, practice drills, proper housing, and care o f equip ment, etc. C. Building im provem ent: 1. Offer assistance in securing better and safer construction. 2. Give advice regarding structural changes in order to make building safer. 3. Regulate and isolate fire hazards in and around buildings. 4. Assist m unicipalities in fram ing local building codes and fire prevention ordinances. 1). E d u cation : 1. Issue monthly bulletins for the press, lire chiefs, trades, schools, clubs, civic bodies, etc. 2. Publish fire prevention day pamphlet. 3. Give public addresses at schools, clubs, commercial organizations, etc. 4. Issue fire prevention cards and posters. CALIFORNIA’S ACCIDENT PREVENTION CAMPAIGN. BY JOHN R. BROWNELL, SUPERINTENDENT OF SAFETY, CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL ACCI DENT COMMISSION. The safety department of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State o f California was organized early in the year 1914, with a nucleus o f safety engineers, each of whom was a specialist in some particular branch o f engineering, and included mechanical, civil (construction), and electrical engineers. The department has later been augmented by a force o f inspectors and is now as follow s: Superintendent o f safety. Tw o m echanical engineers. T w o construction engineers (c iv il). One electrical engineer. T w o electrical inspectors. One ch ief boiler inspector. Three boiler inspectors. One ch ief elevator inspector. Four elevator inspectors. Chief mine inspector. Three deputy mine inspectors. One first-aid instructor. It should be stated that by arrangement with the Federal Bureau o f Mines, the chief mine inspector is also employed by the Bureau of Mines, his salary and traveling expenses being paid jointly by the Government and the Industrial Accident Commission. The 3Tear 1914 was spent largely in “ getting acquainted ” with the employers and as far as possible with employees. Each safety engi neer was especially charged to try to interest employers in the safety committee plan of accident prevention. Emphasis has there fore been laid upon the educational side o f the work. The result has been gratifying, in that there are an increasing number of employers who have developed their safety organizations on a firm basis, with corresponding reductions in their accident fre quencies. It is necessary that mechanical hazards be eliminated where pos sible, and hence the commission, exercising its power, has issued safety orders and rules which now7 cover the following list o f subjects: General; Mines; Woodworking; Laundries; Engines; Elevators; Boilers; Air-pressure tanks; Trench construction; Window cleaning; Electrical utilization; Logging and sawmills; General construction. 25 2G ACCIDEKT PREVEI^TIOX. These will soon be augmented by safety orders covering steam shovels and locomotive cranes, safety rules for quarries, and safety orders for electrical stations. In the preparation of all safety rules and orders the plan was adopted o f having an advisory committee meet with the commission’s representatives and formulate a tentative draft, which was then printed and given wide distribution to those who would be affected, after which one or more public hearings were held, where opportunity was given for full discussion* Upon request, any of the tentative orders or rules were referred back to the advisory committees, who passed finally upon such points and submitted their recommendations to the commission. In prac tically all cases the committee recommendations were adopted by the commission and put into effect on specified dates. In the case of several of the safety orders and rules a fairly exhaus tive investigation in the field was first made by one or more of the safety-department staff, and a preliminary draft drawn up as a basis for discussion by the advisory committee. This proved o f exceptional value in the preparation o f the logging and sawmill safety orders. Mass meetings have been held by the commission in all the prin cipal cities of California, where illustrated talks were given on acci dent prevention. Numerous talks have also been given to groups o f employees, where special stress has been laid upon the individual’s responsibility as regards his own safety as well as in connection with his part in preventing accidental injury to his fellow workmen. From time to time various bulletins have been published dealing with special hazards. Such a series comprised bulletins on the haz ards o f building construction. Cuts o f photographs were printed in these bulletins in order to indicate clearly just what conditions needed correcting. Other bulletins have dealt with boiler-room precautions and with standard signals for woods donkey boilers. In 1916 a u Safety Bear Club ” was organized among the miners o f the State, and, in addition to wearing an appropriate celluloid but ton or badge indicating membership, each miner joining the club has received carefully prepared letters sent to him individually in a sepa rate envelope. There are now over 8,000 members in the club, and nine letters have been sent out to each member. One o f the principal industries o f California is the manufacture o f lumber. The giant redwood is found nowhere else, and the haz ards connected with the logging operations, as well as the handling o f the huge logs at the sawmills, have been o f a special nature. Cali fornia also cuts millions o f feet o f white and sugar pine. A study o f the principal causes of accidents in the lumber industry showed that there was a large class which could be overcome only through the personal caution o f the employee. CALIFORNIANS CAMPAIGN---- J O H N R. BROWNELL. 27 As a result o f the cooperation of the California Redwood Associa tion and the California White and Sugar Pine Manufacturers’ As sociation, which cooperation extended financial aid, a set of eight reels o f motion-picture films were taken and successfully produced showing a series of experiences which were typical o f the hazards to be overcome. Mr, James C. Bennett, one of the safety engineers o f the safety department o f the commission, prepared the scenario, and the actors were all workmen at their actual tasks, or posed to show the results o f observing the necessary precautions. The showing of the pictures has been handled much the same as a circulating library, each o f the eight separate reels dealing with practically a complete phase in itself. The films were prepared during the latter part o f 1917, and have been widely shown at various logging camps and sawmills o f the State, In January, 1917, the safety department issued its first number o f “ California Safety News,” which has appeared as a monthly period ical o f 16 pages. W ith a few exceptions the articles have been writ ten by members o f the department. Illustrations have been freely inserted and various phases of accident prevention have been treated., Through its corps o f safety engineers and inspectors the mechan ical hazards are being eliminated as rapidly as possible. The safety orders and rules have become the recognized standards in all new construction and in existing installations wherever practicable. The basic principle of the workmen’s compensation, insurance, and safety act under which the Industrial Accident Commission operates stipulates that all safety requirements shall be reasonable, and hence a broad and flexible interpretation is given. The “ Star and club ” method of handling inspections has been taboo from the inception of the safety department and a spirit, rather, o f cooperation and service has been developed which has won the unqualified support o f all concerned. In the spring o f 1914 a safety museum was started by the com mission. It has grown to such proportions that approximately 3,000 square feet o f floor space is occupied with several hundred separate exhibits o f safety devices. These are augmented by collections o f photographs showing safeguarded conditions in California’s indus trial plants. There are also several exhibits of photographs from other States. The museum is advantageously located on the ground floor of the Underwood Building at 529 Market Street, San Fran cisco, and has often had a daily attendance of over 700 visitors. A capable caretaker is in charge at all times to explain the operation of any device or to indicate by photograph how various hazards have been overcome. 28 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. Several hundred lantern slides have been prepared and are on file in the safety department for use in lectures by various members o f the staff, besides being available to safety engineers and others who desire to show them at industrial-plant committee meetings and safety rallies. With the vastly augmented shipbuilding program, the shipyards o f California began to enlarge existing equipment, and a number o f new companies came into the field. This has meant a corresponding in crease in an employment which presents probably the two most pro lific sources o f accidents, namely, (1) falling, flying, and rolling materials, and (2) personal falls. In April, 1918, the superintendent of safety of the commission called a meeting o f safety engineers and inspectors o f the various shipbuilding concerns o f the San Francisco Bay region. The meet ing proved successful in bringing together in a round-table discussion those who were in closest touch with the work. Mr. C. E. Ealston, Government safety engineer at Mare Island Navy Yard, attended, find by his enthusiasm and practical ideas gave valuable impetus to the spirit o f the meeting. Subsequent meetings have been held at approximately monthly periods. The shipyards at San Pedro, Long Beach, San Diego, and Eureka are so widely separated geographically as to make it impracticable for them to participate in the discussions, but through inspections by our safety engineers they are kept posted on the best practices. A letter has been sent to the Emergency Fleet Corporation,, asking for their cooperation with the commission in taking motion pictures o f shipyard hazards. The matter has been referred to Washington for decision, and we are hopeful o f receiving a favorable answer to the proposition. The employment of labor in new fields, and especially the increas ing tendency for women to discharge the duties commonly performed by men, has been a cause of more or less apprehension as to any sub stantial reduction in the accident frequency, Jbut it is none the less to be conceded that where earnest accident-prevention propaganda is carried on there will result correspondingly fewer accidental injuries in our industries, and California is determined to clo her part in con serving the man power o f the Nation. W H A T T H E N E W Y O R K S T A T E IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N IS D O IN G T O P R E V E N T A C C ID E N T S . BY JAMES Ii. GERNON, FIRST DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. The Bureau o f Factory Inspection of the New York Department o f Labor has, since July 1, 1915 (at which date the present indus trial commission was created), conducted a most vigorous campaign to prevent industrial injuries and has accomplished very satisfac tory results in securing compliance with the large number o f orders issued relating to sanitation, accident prevention, and fire protection. New York State has within its borders 65.449 factories, employ ing 1,500,000 people. The industries are diversified— including prac tically every industry found in other States of the Union, many of them in greater number than in any other State and some in such large numbers that they present difficult problems peculiar to the industry. Many o f the larger industrial plants employ safety engineers, who carry on very creditable safety campaigns and some excellent wel fare work. Nevertheless, there are many large establishments that do not employ safety men nor have they properly organized safety work in their plants. Many w7ho endeavor to carry on safety cam paigns fail in their effort, due to an inferior type of safety director. In some instances where the director is competent, failure is due to the management o f the establishment in not permitting the director to spend sufficient money to install safeguards properly and organize safe practices in a practical and efficient manner. Thus, it very frequently happens that improper and impractical guarding has to be discarded and orders issued by the inspection bureau to provide adequate protection to the employees o f the establishment. While many plants in our State are doing very creditable work in their endeavors to prevent industrial injuries, it should be borne in mind that many thousands of factories do nothing to organize effective safety wTork—some because of lack of knowledge or indif ference, others because of their reluctance to spend money for the installation of devices to protect the workers from injury. In many establishments this policy is pursued, regardless of the fact, which is now generally conceded, that the installation of safeguards, the adoption of safe practices for the industry, and the instruction of the employees regarding these practices are known to be a paying 29 30 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. investment, even in the smallest plant. There are many small manu facturers to whom the cost of safety devices is a serious problem, because of the financial condition of the business, and far too many o f them believe that in paying a premium for compensation they have protected themselves from financial loss, the cost of injuries being shifted to the insurance carriers. They have no regard con cerning the injury or physical suffering which their employees may experience. In consideration of all these difficulties, the New York State In spection Bureau has grappled with this important problem and has been fairly successful in mastering the same. It should be borne in mind that those responsible for the conduct of the large majority of the manufacturing establishments know far too little o f the prac tical methods o f installing safeguards or conducting safe practices in industry. They can not afford to hire a safety engineer and do not seem competent to meet the problem in a practical w ay; therefore* the State inspector must act as safety man in this large class o f establishments. In this type o f establishment, and in those where they readily install proper safeguards, the inspector must instruct both the employer and the workman in a practical, up-to-date method o f safeguarding and in the inauguration of a proper plan o f con ducting a campaign o f safe practices. In the enforcement o f orders relative to safeguarding employees from injury there are those who claim that all that is necessary to induce manufacturers to install safeguards is proper cooperation between the manufacturer and the State inspection bureau charged with the enforcement o f the provisions o f the law. Such cooperation is ideal; it is essential, but not always possible to secure. Experience shows that without a policy o f insistence on compliance with the or ders issued, and without the power to prosecute violators of. the law or authority to tag machinery unsafe, not much would be accom plished. A very large percentage o f the manufacturers in New Y ork State are cooperating w'ith the inspection bureau. These manufac turers deserve great credit for the results accomplished by them in making their plants as safe as possible. Their efforts will compare very favorably with employers o f other States in their desire to make their establishments as safe as possible, in order to protect the employees from industrial injury. A conservative estimate o f the cost for installing safeguards in compliance with the orders issued in New York State for the past three years will total an aggregate o f $530005000. You will understand that the number of orders relative to accident prevention does not include the number o f machines to be safe guarded. Our order may mean the guarding o f one machine, or it may mean, as frequently happens, the guarding of hundreds o f ma WHAT M W YORK STATE IS BOIXG-----J. L. GER3ST0X. 31 chines o f the same type. Nevertheless, far too many o f the establish ments must be forced to do what is reasonable and fair for the protec tion o f their employees will be shown in the tables o f prosecutions, tagging, etc., accompanying this report. In order to measure properly the results accomplished in New York State, there is presented here the figures relative to orders issued and compliances secured for the past five years: O R D E R S A N D COMPLIANCES R E P O R T E D B Y THE. D IV ISIO N OF FACTORY IN SPE C TIO N IN THE: STATE O F N E W Y O R K FROM OCTOBER 1, 19-13, TO JU N E 30, M g . Orders and compliances relating to health and safety. Sanitation. Fiscal year ending— Accident prevention. Fire protection. TotaL Whole number ; of orders amt compliances. Sept- 3G, 1914......... Sept. 3D*, 1915.......... June- 30, 1916t.,........ June 30-,1917........... June 30,1918........... ; 74,359 4L<m 70, m 41,418 : 34,24? 50,742 >32,088 ' SI,.944 36,483 53,555 68,201 i 46,288 48*735 54,849 * 39,730 40,286 m > m 38,122 '■33,710= 41,634 : 13>433 : 9y6S4 47,47a 1 6*022- ; 58,947 27,378 : 22,69S : 17,481 8>39T m m Compli Compli Compli Compli Orders. Compli ances. Orders. ances. Orders. ances. Orders. ances. OsdeiSv ances. 143,327 ! 99,754 96,277 : 141,168 110,721 287,893 179,826 163,96S 135,697 >116,399 . 125,889 173,982 206,§25 135,703 ; 152,361 T o ta l............ 250,105 228,335 244,011 22&,am 168,1-54 134,908 662,279 2591,247 ■877, Ua »80Q, 3CS 1 For 9 months. 2 E x c lu siv e ^ f 16>132, 8,422, and 31,425 orders relating- respectively to sanitation, accident prevention, and firejprotectioa, in? wmefr eases jurisdiction was. transferred- fey law to> N ew Y ode City departments, or the illegal conditions ceased to e x ist by reason of modifications in th e Labor L aw and Industrial Code, rem ovals, fires, or accompanying- eireumstaaeea aoeh as to-naaie th e original* orders Bta longernecessary to be enforced b y th e Department o f Labor. These figures bring th e aggregate num ber of orders disposed of in regard to sanitation, accident prevention, and fire protection up to , respectively, 244,567, 236,432, and 166,327, th u s leaving 5,638, 7,579, and 1,827 orders outstanding on July 1,1918, respectively, i a relation to sanitation, accident prevention, and fire protection, making a total of 15,044 orders outstanding on July 1,19-18, for these-three groups. 3 Exclusive o f62,108rorders in which jurisdiction was transferred by law to N ew Y ork City departm ents, or the illegal conditions ceased b y reason of modifications in the Labor Law and Industrial Code, rem ovals, fires, or accompanying circumstances such as to make the original orders no longer necessary to be enforced b y the Department of Labor. These figures bring th e aggregate number of orders disposed of up to 862^506,leaviingate^afof 15,4^G®cfeES-©iiteta£Qding;o® July 1 , 19-18-., In d u d ed m th ese 15,439uncompMed with. orders are 4,440 orders th a t were issued* in the m onth of June, 1918; and th e im possibility of securing compliance w ith th e major portion- of these latter orders before July 1 is readily apparent. There were 877,945 orders issued and 800,389 compliances secured. O f the remaining 77,547 orders, 6-2,108 constituted fire protection orders in New York City, which were transferred to the New York City fire department by reason o f modification of the Labor Law placing the responsibility for compliance with these orders on the fire department o f that city. This leaves 15,439 orders uncomplied with. In this number are included 4,440 orders issued in the month o f June* 1918. The table also shows the number o f orders issued and compliances secured relative to health and safety, which include orders for sanita tion, accident prevention, and fire protection. A total of 662,270 orders were issued; 591,247 compliances were secured. It is evident from these figures that there remain 15,044 orders o f this class uncomplied with. In this number are included 3,514 orders issued in the month o f June, 1918, compliance with which can not be expected before July 1, 1918. There being but 15,439 orders o f all kinds out 32 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. standing shows tliat our compliances are nearly up to date, or as near so as can be expected wlien the character o f the orders and the time it will take to do the work are taken into consideration. Under the provisions of section 81 o f the Labor Law, we are em powered to tag as unsafe all machines which are dangerous and un guarded. With this provision of law we have the most effective means o f securing compliance with the orders issued. I f the orders are not complied with at the time set forth in the notice o f orders, a letter known as a “ Machinery tagging letter ” is forwarded, fixing a definite date for compliance. W e are in receipt o f a report from our inspector that you have failed to com ply with the orders o f the department, to w i t : 1. Properly guard belts and pulleys o f job presses. This shows that you are m aintaining a hazardous condition in violation o f section 81 o f the Labor L a w : When in the opinion o f the commissioner o f labor a machine or any part thereof is in a dangerous condition or is not properly guarded or is dangerously placed, the use thereof shall be prohibited by the commissioner o f labor (State Industrial Com m ission), and a notice to that effect shall be attached thereto. Such notice shall not be removed except by an authorized representative o f the Department o f Labor, nor until the machinery is made safe and the required safeguards or safety appliances or devices are provided, and in the meantime such unsafe or dangerous machinery shall not be used. Unless the above orders are satisfactorily com plied w ith by August 20, 1918, the department w ill cause the machinery to be tagged in accordance w ith the provisions o f the Labor Law, thereby prohibiting the use o f such machinery until the orders are fully complied w ith and the hazard removed. Tours, truly, Supervising In spector. Should the order not be complied with at the time indicated in the “ Machinery tagging letter,” the "unsafe tag is applied to the machine and its use prevented. UNSAFE. By virtue o f the pow er conferred upon the Commissioner o f L abor in section 81 o*E the labor law, the use o f this pow er press is hereby prohibited until made safe. This notice must not be removed except by representative o f this department. To In spectors: This tag must be applied in all cases w here a machine or any part thereof— (1 ) Is in a dangerous condition. (2) Is dangerously placed. (3) Is im properly guarded. (4 ) Guard is removed. (5) Term s o f our notice not com plied with within the tim e specified therein. Return this tag w ith report to supervising inspector. Removed by inspector on ---------- , 191-. Name and address o f concern ---------- . Rem arks ---------- . 33 W H A T N E W YORK STATE IS DOING-----J. L. GERNON. Tliis has proved the most effective method of securing compliance with the orders to safeguard machinery. We issue many o f these let ters and are compelled to apply the “ unsafe” tag in very few in stances, when compared with the number o f letters issued. In only 933 cases were the tags used in the fiscal year ended June 30, 1918, which is small in number when compared with the 47,475 compliances for aceident-prevention orders secured in the same period. Following is a list of machines to which tags were attached: Shafting and couplings, buffing, polishing and grinding wheels, drill presses, saws o f all kinds, planer, jointers, and molding machines, corner staying ma chines, extractors, laundry machines, winder, calenders, and rolling machines, belts and pullej-s, printing presses, punch presses, stamping and rivetting ma chines, gears, lathes, milling machines, mixers and kneaders, ruling machines, lapping machines, reamer, and slotters. The effectiveness of this system is proved by the small number of prosecutions begun relative to accident prevention orders in compari son to the number of prosecutions for other classes of orders issued. The following statement shows the number of prosecutions begun during the year ending June 30, 1918: A d m in istra tion _______________________________________________ S a n ita tion ____________________________________________________ Accident prevention___________________________________________ Fire protection_______________________________________________ C h ild re n ______________________________________________________ Women and male m in o rs_____________________________________ Day o f r e s t___________________________________________________ M isce lla n e o u s________________________________________________ 7 502 52 230 433 191 257 137 T o t a l ___________________________________________________1,869 The 52 prosecutions for accident prevention, as shown in this table, were in instances where the application of the “ unsafe ” tag would not prevent the use of a machine. Their character is indicated in the following table: Prosecutions instituted in current year relative to accident prevention. 1. 2. 3. 4. Elevators and hoistways_____________________________________ _13 M achinery (including vats, pans, e t c .)____________________ *_ 13 Stairs, platforms, pits, floors, etc. (including re p a irs)______ 13 Lighting to prevent accidents_______________________________ __13 The New York Department o f Labor realizes that the hazard in industry is very great. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1918, there were 300,000 industrial accidents reported to the commission, result ing in 55,000 claims for compensation. The injuries cost approx imately $35,000,000 to $40,000,000, and the compensation awarded will total approximately $14,500,000. This is an enormous economic loss, regardless o f the suffering these injuries entail. They should 124247°— 19------ 3 34 ACCIDENT PPiEVEXTIOST. be reduced to a minimum. When we measure the claims for com pensation with the number o f factories in the State, we find that there are less than one for each factory. It should not be forgotten that the injuries reported and those for which claims for compensa tion are made are not all sustained in factories. A t least half the injuries occur in those industrial groups over which the inspection bureau has no power to regulate or improve the hazardous condition. The inspection bureau has been very successful in its policy o f requiring every inspector to report all installations of new ma chinery installed since previous inspection, where the machine itself is ^dangerous and the manufacturer of the machine has failed to guard same properly. In each instanee a communication, giving in detail the defects, is sent to the manufacturer o f the machine asking that they be corrected. It is very gratifying to say that in every instance the makers o f the machines have signified their intention to remedy the-defects and have heartily cooperated with the bureau o f inspection in an effort to make their machines safe for the operator. We have completed special surveys o f the dyeing and cleaning, textile, and chemical industries, the report o f the last two not being published to date. We are conducting special surveys relative to ventilation, which is a very essential but difficult problem in many industries, especially those using poisonous or injurious gases, fumes, or substances. When these surveys, investigations, and lists are com pleted, the industrial commission can establish standards on a scientific and practical basis, and thus forge a few more links in the already strong chain o f safe practices being enforced for the pro tection o f the industrial workers. Never in the country’s history has so much depended on our in dustries, and most important are the workers in such industries. The present world conflict will be decided in favor o f the nations having the greatest man power. Never has a worker been valued so highly. So in this campaign for safe practices in industry we only do our share when we furnish our full measure of protection to the workers in industry, so that they may contribute all their efficiency and skill to the country’s cause. T H E V IT A L IM P O R T A N C E O F IN D U S T R IA L -A C C I B E N T T IO N IN W A R T IM E . PREVEN BY VICTOR C. NOONAN, DIRECTOR OF SAFETY, OHIO INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. A ll the industrial commissions and compensation boards of the United States and Canada should at this meeting consider and devise some plan to bring home to the employers and workingmen o f the United States and Canada the very vital importance in these war days o f conserving man power—in other words, of more thor oughly protecting human life and limb and reducing industrial acci dents to a minimum. It is now as clear as daylight to all who have given any thought to accident prevention that at least 25 to 75 per cent o f the accidents occurring in workshops and factories can be eliminated. The splendid accident reduction experience o f the United States Steel Corporation and o f thousands of individual plants throughout the country has proved beyond the shadow o f a doubt the great possibility o f preventing both fatal and nonfatal accidents. During the past year the department o f safety o f the Industrial Commission o f Ohio has conducted a survey in about 500 o f the larger industries of the State with a view to finding out definitely what results were being obtained by organized businesslike safety work. The survey shows that where accident prevention was a busi nesslike department, thoroughly organized, with workmen’s safety committees, and where the number, causes, frequency, and cost of accidents were carefully kept and accidents investigated, there was a reduction of anywhere from 25 to 75 per cent in the number o f accidents reported since these companies had commenced accident prevention work. In spite of the good work that has been accomplished along safety lines, much more can be done. I am glad to say that the war has given the safety movement throughout the country a much-needed stimulus. It has become apparent that for every soldier we send to the trenches we must protect and safeguard at least 10 workers in the factories. When one of these workers is killed or disabled by industrial accidents the loss of that worker to the country, to my way o f thinking, is ten times greater than if one o f the boys in the trenches had been killed or disabled. Accident prevention, therefore, should be a very important war activity; in fact, it should be one o f our most important war activities. Employers and workmen alike 35 36 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. iiiust consider it their highest patriotic duty to do everything pos sible to prevent accidents. Every fatal accident, every eye lost, every hand or foot crushed or amputated— in a word, every accident that occurs to a worker—is just as much o f a victory for Germany as if those workers had been disabled by German guns. On the other hand, every accident prevented is a glorious victory for the Stars and Stripes. It is a victory also for better living, better citizenship, and happier homes. Industrial-accident prevention, therefore, gives us a great oppor tunity to make the industrial life o f our country a safer place to wrork in. Industrial-accident prevention will not only teach men and women to be more careful, but it will teach all the workers, as well as employers, how to think. It will teach the workers to be more industrious, more thrifty, more sober, and more upright. Industrialaccident prevention will also give all o f our people a higher appre ciation o f the value o f human life and limb, and surely in these days, when life and limb are held so cheaply, that higher apprecia tion is sadly needed. No organization or organizations can do more to promote indus trial-accident prevention than the industrial accident boards and commissions o f the United States and Canada working as a body, and also each State working individually. In Ohio during the past four years considerable educational accident-prevention work has been accomplished: First, through meetings o f employers, superintendents, and foremen; second, through meet ings o f employees; third, by safety exhibits; fourth, by safety motion pictures illustrating the cause and prevention o f accidents reported to the commission; fifth, by safety bulletins and other literature; and, sixth, by a study o f the accident experience o f individual plants or groups o f industries. W H A T PENNSYLVANIA IS DOING TO PREVENT ACCIDENTS. BY ROBERT D. YOUNG, PENNSYLVANIA SAFETY MAN. It has been well said, “ Cooperation is to-day an accepted element in any program of industrial or social improvement,” and the one great question at present confronting those agencies having as their purpose the conservation of life and limb in industry is the extension o f this cooperative element, and we feel that the Pennsylvania De partment o f Labor and Industry has in the past few years put forth splendid efforts along these lines, and, although accidents have con tinued to occur with alarming frequency, especially in 1916, 1917, and 1918, due in part to the abnormal war conditions prevailing, we are going on, confident that the pendulum will soon swing forward and that this preliminary or ground work will be reflected in the coming years in a material reduction of the injuries and deaths caused by preventable accidents. To elate, for 1918, both fatal and serious accidents in the industries of Pennsylvania show a decrease over the same period for 1917, this notwithstanding the increase in the number o f men employed this year over last year. There is still, however, much to be done to bring accidents down to a minimum, and to this end the Department o f Labor and Industry is endeavoring to secure a more continuous co operation of the employer and employee. The laws as enacted in Pennsylvania make mandatory the provid ing o f safeguards for machinery and for the protection of all hazards, yet it is necessary, through educational endeavor, to impress the em ployees that such safeguards shall be used, and that every device or instrument which may be approved as desirable or effective in the prevention o f industrial accidents shall be likewise constantly and conscientiously used. As we are all aware, regardless of how well machinery may be safeguarded or how processes may be changed to eliminate the danger of injury, there still remains, as the most important and the most difficult factor in the whole situation, the personal equation, mostly the employees themselves, and our energy and attention as a department has been directed to them—however, with the cooperation and help o f the employer. 37 38 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. As a solution to this aspect of tho problem we have been apply ing our best thought to the development of a system of industrialaccident-prevention education, realizing that if prompt or imme diate returns are to be had the industrial worker must be educated and trained in safe practices—to understand thoroughly the hazard o f his job and to perceive and avoid danger, not only to himself but also to his fellow employee. We shall indeed be remiss i f we do not lay plans for the education of the industrial worker o f to-morrow, and it is to be hoped that before long a comprehensive system of personal safety education will, through the cooperation o f the school authorities and the Depart ment o f Labor and Industry, be devised which will be productive o f the best possible results in that direction. In our educational work the first point of attack is the employers and the plant managements. Through personal interviews we en deavor to point out to them, both from the humane and the financial side o f the proposition, the importance o f conserving their man power. We are pleased to observe that, when attention is called to the daily appalling waste through industrial accidents, to the physical suffering o f the injured, and to the privations which follow an in jury to the wage earner, the sympathy of the employers and their generous impulses have been stirred, resulting in their taking up the work in an earnest, sincere manner. We are also pleased to state that the majority of those establishments which have had the matter called to their attention have organized for safety, which augurs well for the success of accident prevention in Pennsylvania. After we have interested the plant managements in the safety work we assist them, if they desire, in the formation o f their accident-prevention campaign, and furnish gratis a series o f motionpicture exhibits and hold safety rallies, which help to keep the em ployees interested in the work. Already the department’s motionpieture films have been exhibited to thousands of our industrial workers and their families throughout the State, and those pictures have, no doubt, been productive of much good. In addition to the safety films the department sends, without charge, safetv posters and bulletins. The success or failure o f an accident-prevention campaign m a plant depends in a large measure upon the attitude o f the foremen toward the movement, and consequently we consider it necessary to impress them with their great responsibility in the protection o f the workers under their supervision. T o accomplish this purpose, spe cial meetings for superintendents and foremen are held in the various localities, at which forceful speakers drive home the safety lesson. W H A T PEN N SYLVANIA IS DOING---- Pt. D. YOUNG. 39 Witliin recent weeks more than 40 such meetings were held by the Western Pennsylvania Division of the National Safety Council, in cooperation with the Department o f Labor and Industry, in Alle gheny and adjacent counties, attended by at least 4,000 superintend ents and foremen. Meetings are frequently held during the lunch hour for the work men and are addressed by our inspectors. A ll this tends to keep the matter of self-preservation constantly on the worker’s mind. In addition to our factory inspectors, we have special accident in vestigators w7ho devote all their time to the investigation o f fatal and serious accidents. These operate under the direction of the bureau of safety. Assuming that all accidents are preventable, a case is not con sidered closed or filed until there has been received by the depart ment positive evidence that something definite has been done to pre vent the recurrence of a similar accident, either from the employer or from the accident investigator. Immediately upon the receipt of a fatal-accident report, which by* law must be forwarded to the de partment within 24 hours after the accident occurs, the report is forwarded to the investigator in whose district the accident hap pened. The investigator proceeds to the scene of the accident with the least possible delay, thus enabling him to ascertain the cause of the accident before the conditions are changed, and to issue instruc tions or recommendations for the prevention of another similar accident. Upon the receipt of the investigator’s report of his in vestigation by the bureau of safety, the matter is taken up direct b y the bureau with the company, and the importance o f prompt com pliance with the investigator’s recommendations is pointed out to them. I f the company has a safety organization, a general outline of how it is conducted, with a report of the number of accidents for the previous two years, with the average number of employees, is re quested. I f the company has no safety organization, it is urged to take up accident prevention wrork through this system, which our experience has proved to be efficient. Through this method we are enabled to ascertain just what the companies are doing to prevent acci dents. To still further the cause of safety, the department is cooperating writh the organized labor bodies of Pennsylvania in putting into effect the resolution presented and adopted by the American Federation of Labor in convention at Buffalo, 1ST. Y., Saturday, November 17, 1917. Already a State labor safety committee has been appointed, and safety committees are being appointed in all the local unions of the 40 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. State, and, as we see it, through this means safety is but the entering wedge whereby a better understanding can be developed between the employer and the employee. With it must come a frank discussion of one vital problem, the solution of which works for their mutual benefit. Having found that the cooperative plan really works for the good of all in this one instance, does it not stand to reason that the circle of application wTill grow, become larger and larger, until through faith in each other the contending forces will be led out of the wilderness of strife and misunderstanding into the promised land of industrial peace— made a fact through a square deal for all? W HAT M A S S A C H U S E T T S IS B Y W IL L IA M D O IN G TO PREVENT A C C ID E N T S . W . K E X N A R D , C H A IR M A N , M A S S A C H U S E T T S IN D U S T R IA L A C CID EN T BOARD. At the present time the work of accident prevention per se in Massa chusetts is delegated, by an act of the legislature passed in 1916, Acts of 1916, chapter 308, to a State commission known as the Board o f Labor and Industries. When the Massachusetts Industrial Accident Board was created this work was placed with our board, and our earlier reports indicate the scope and character of the work done. It was found, however, that there was a duplication of work at many points with the work o f the commission on labor and industries, and particularly was the complaint made from the shop and factory owners that the constant and repeated visits and investigations of inspectors from various boards and commissions and the varying orders received were con fusing and disorganizing and that the situations created had become highly burdensome. It should be understood that it was not these two boards alone, but various other governmental agencies, National, State, and local, which were contributors to the conditions com plained of. It was commonly stated by manufacturers, and with some basis of justification, that hardly a day went by that they were not inspected and directed by an agent from some board or other. To help out this situation and to relieve the manufacturers so far as accident prevention work was concerned, in 1913, by chapter 813 of the acts o f the legislature of that year, it was provided that the Industrial Accident Board and the Board of Labor and Industries should work in conjunction and cooperation in accident prevention work. This was found to be so unsatisfactory that in 1916 the pres ent law, giving sole jurisdiction to the Board of Labor and Indus tries, was enacted; since which time the work of our board has been confined to the broad consideration of the problems involved in acci dent prevention, rather than the actual detail. Our statistical department still furnishes an excellent compilation o f causes o f accidents gleaned from our reports, which makes a val uable basis for investigation. The Board o f Labor and Industries has in our department one of its employees to whom is available our reports o f injuries, which are made the basis of actual field investi-. gation by the Board o f Labor and Industries. 41 42 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. You may wonder that this work was permitted to be taken from the control o f the board which would appear to be its proper administra tion. Our Board of Labor and Industries is, however, charged with functions which make this work closely allied to its other functions, viz, preservation o f health conditions, observance o f hours o f labor, etc. Moreover, the administration of the compensation law in Massa chusetts has been so established that our board finds itself with its time fully occupied. Every case in which any dispute arises which cannot be amicably settled between the parties comes ultimately before a member o f our commission personally, first at a conference, and, if not adjusted there, later at a formal hearing, always with an attor ney on one side, and ordinarily on both, and later, in case o f appeal, before the full board, which sits one day each week to hear such cases. When I call to your attention that last month there was reported to our board 18,000 injuries to employees, you will perhaps better ap preciate why, speaking for my board, I do not report greater activi ties in our department along the lines of accident prevention. A C C ID E N T P R E V E N T IO N BY GEORGE A. K IN G S T O N , IN C O M M IS S IO N E R , IN D U S T R IE S WORKM EN’ S IN O N T A R IO . C O M P E N S A T IO N BOARD OF ONTARIO . The Workmen’s Compensation Act o f Ontario differs from most other acts in respect to the provision made for the prevention o f accidents, and offers at the same time an inducement to the employers to cooperate. Under the Ontario act the employers in any particular class cov ered by the act may form an association for the purpose of establish ing rules and regulations for safety or accident prevention among their employees. Such association must, o f course, represent a sub stantial majority of the industries in the class concerned. When such rules and regulations are adopted by the association and ap proved by the workmen’s compensation board and the lieutenant governor in council they become binding on all the manufacturers in the class represented. The associations so formed appoint in spectors to visit the different plants of the employers for the purpose o f recommending such mechanical improvements or safety devices as may be considered important or necessary, encouraging and assist ing in the development o f safety work, and the formation of safety committees in the shops, and generally in promoting the work o f applying the “ ounce o f prevention.” The Industrial Accident Prevention Association of Ontario, which embraces the several associations formed under the act, with their staff o f seven inspectors, made approximately 10,000 safety recom mendations last year. Each recommendation is followed up until a report is received from the employer that the recommendation has been satisfactorily disposed of. It is perhaps remarkable to note that the association has been able to obtain cooperation from the employers to such an extent that recommendations made are carried out as stated below : Ninety per cent are carried out, as first made, without question. Five per cent require some suggestion as to how the recommenda tion may be carried out. Five per cent require some further explanation or reason given, or a second visit of the inspector. A report o f each inspection, showing the recommendations made and the disposition o f each, is filed with the workmen’s compensa- 43 44 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. tion board, which enables the board at any time to check up in case o f accident, first, to see if the accident is one that could have been prevented, and, second, to find out the attitude o f the employer toward accident prevention generally as applied to his plant. Merit rating is a further inducement for the emplo}^er to cooperate with the work of the safety inspector. The policy o f the Accident Prevention Association is to act as advisers on safety work and assist in every way in devising means to apply mechanical devices or guards, where possible, and to assist in the organization of shop safety committees, solicit subscriptions for the bulletin service, and promote the use of safety warnings in shops. In selecting inspectors for the work mentioned men of practical experience have been chosen, those who have had experience in the particular classes represented by the association. These inspectors meet frequently for the purpose of exchanging information and to establish certain standards to enable them to work on a plan that is uniform. It is impossible, of course, to form any accurate judgment as to the extent to which accidents may have been prevented. It is inter esting, however, to note the improved physical condition o f the plants that have been under the supervision of these inspectors for the last few years. Frequent requests are received from employers for information and advice as to some plan they have under con sideration for accident prevention. W HAT IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N S CAN DO TO PREVENT A C C ID E N T S . B Y S ID N E Y J . W I L L I A M S , M A N A G E R , A C CID EN T PR E V EN TIO N D IV IS IO N , N A T IO N A L SAFETY C O U N C IL . An essential to success in any safety campaign, whether State wide or in an individual plant, is a proper balance between safe guarding and education. Education will prevent a greater number of accidents; safeguarding will prevent more serious accidents. Education brings the greatest results for the least money, and is therefore favored by the employer; safeguarding suggests laws, in spections, the “ big stick,” and has naturally been emphasized by most governmental departments. Education without safeguarding is not sincere; safeguarding without education is narrow. Either one without the other can achieve only limited success. The pendulum swings back and forth, but each oscillation brings us closer to the golden mean. The employer who said a few years ago that all accidents were due to carelessness, and that legislative requirements were absurd and oppressive, was not entirely wrong; many legislative requirements were absurd and oppressive. Now, when State codes are framed by expert administrative bodies, guided by the best advice obtainable, such objection is not heard so often from the employer. Yet I know State departments in which the chief executive is beyond reproach in his sincere desire to give his people the best possible service, but where the arbitrary and unin telligent behavior of some of the field inspectors still gives em ployers just ground for complaint and prevents complete harmony of feeling and action. There is only one thing to cI q wTith such in spectors if the department is to be made really efficient. On the other hand^ State officers often have good reason for feel ing that a certain employer has introduced a safety organization in his plant principally to cover up glaring defects in his mechanical equipment. Such camouflage, which does not deserve the name of safety education, is looked upon with disgust by every employer who is doing honest safety work, and I believe that the number of em ployers in the first-mentioned class is growing smaller, or at least the number who are doing honest work is rapidly increasing. This tendency in the right direction is hastened by the growing realiza tion that in a plant of any considerable size the safety work can not be left to a committee or a system of committees, but should be in charge of an experienced full-time safety engineer. No safety engi neer with the most rudimentary idea of honesty will attempt to conduct an educational campaign until he has at least made a start in correcting physical hazards. Reflecting this attitude, the National 45 46 ACCIDENT PREVENTION. Safety Council, which is essentially a cooperative organization of employers, is giving increasing attention to mechanical safeguard ing and engineering revision. Of course, the council can not require the observance of standards on the part of its members; but it can cooperate with other national and State organizations, both public and private, in wTorking out correct and reasonable standards, and can encourage the important work of underwriters’ laboratories, in testing and labeling safety devices. The progressive States here represented have broken away from the old idea of factory inspection based on legal authority sloneTand have carried on extensive educational campaigns. But even aside from the occasional ignorant and unteachable inspector of the old school, to whom I have already paid my respects, few State depart ments, if any, have as yet made the fullest possible use of educational methods. The employer requires education, as well as the employee, and more can be accomplished in this way than by legal prosecutions. One excellent way of educating the employer, which several States are now using, is to confront him occasionally with a record of his own accidents. There is no time when the average employer is quite so ready to listen to suggestions from the department, as when he has just had a serious accident—provided the subject is not approached from the standpoint o f “ I told you so.” In the case of small estab lishments, the accident experience of the entire industry must be used. I f the employer’s record shows a large preponderance of acci dents due to overcrowding, disorder, and carelessness, the State should recommend not only a safety organization, but a safety engi neer, as the only remedy for such accidents. I question whether any State has yet made the fullest possible use of such individual sta tistics. It is generally agreed that the foreman can do more to help or harm the safety movement in a shop than any one else in the or ganization. The State department can do much to educate the fore man. I believe that foremen’s meetings should, as a rule, be con ducted by the factory inspector himself, in connection with his regu lar inspections. To supplement this personal contact, some depart ments are also publishing a monthly magazine designed principally for the foreman. This should preferably be sent to each foreman individually at his home. For educating the workman himself, the up-to-date department will encourage the holding* o f safety meetings or safety rallies and will furnish speakers. Some States also distribute posters for the factory bulletin board. My opinion on this point was formed about a year ago, when I was engineer for the Wisconsin commission. The State department can not compete—at least it can not compete eco nomically—with the weekly bulletin service of the National Safety W H A T INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONS CAN DO---- S. J . W IL LIA M S. 47 Council, either in quality or quantity. It is true that free distribu tion by the State will reach many employers who are not members o f the National Council. A bulletin which costs nothing, however, is apt to be considered by the recipient as w^orth just about what it costs. A safety bulletin put up carelessly, or in the wrong location, or left for months until it becomes torn and dirty, is worse than no safety bulletin at all. Most o f the Wisconsin inspectors agreed with me in this, and thought that instead o f spending our money in gettingout second-class bulletins o f which a majority would go into the waste basket, we might better encourage employers to join the Na tional Safety Council. As I have already indicated, the formulation o f standards or codes for safeguarding is peculiarly a governmental function, except in war time, when it is peculiarly a State function. During the past five years State industrial commissions have greatly advanced the science and art o f formulating safety standards. How unfortunate it is, that while new safety codes are continually being adopted, and old ones revised, no serious effort has been made for uniformity! W e are fond o f saying that an administrative commission can formulate such a code much better than a legislature; yet the industrial codes thus adopted in different States are as little uniform as the statutes on mar riage and divorce. The advantages of uniform safety standards in the different States will surely be admitted without argument; and I can not believe that the practical difficulties are insurmountable. A serious effort for uniformity should be made without further delay. In addition to all the .various State standards, there are already several different standards o f a national character, such as the stand ards o f the schedule-rating committees o f the Federal Safety Engi neers, the United States Compensation Board, and (on certain sub jects) the American Society o f Mechanical Engineers. A move ment for uniformity might well be started by this association, with the backing o f the Federal Bureau o f Labor Statistics and the Fed eral Bureau o f Standards, and I urge most seriously that you take some action thereon at this meeting. This does not mean that every State must pledge itself to throw away its own standards and adopt others. It* simply means that the State and national departments interested and other organizations such as the engineering societies, the insurance companies, and the National Safety Council would agree to get together and form a joint committee, the result o f whose work might properly be termed a national standard; this national standard would then serve as a guide for States adopting new codes, and would naturally be given some weight when existing codes are being revised. Complete uniformity is doubtless impossible, and per haps undesirable—but a measurable approach thereto can surely be made. T U E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 24— E V E N IN G S E S S IO N . Chairman, Charles S. Andrus, Chairman, Industrial Commission of Illinois. II. AD M IN ISTR ATIVE PROBLEMS. S T A T IS T IC S A S A N A ID IN A D M IN IS T R A T IO N . B Y W . H . B U R H O P , SE CRETARY, W IS C O N S IN CO M PE N S A TIO N IN S U R A N C E BOARD. Five years ago the statement could have properly been made that administrative bodies of our States, dealing with compensation and labor laws, have woefully failed in the field of accident and work men’s compensation statistics; that they have failed to realize the value o f statistics as an aid to the proper discharge of their public function. Unfortunately not all of our States even at this time fully appreciate the value of an adequate statistical department; too many still regard statistics as either unnecessaiy or simply as a record of what has been done, and not as a guide for future work or future leg islation. True, it is possible to pay an injured man 200 weeks’ comjDensation for the loss o f an arm, if such* is specifically provided in the compensation act without reference to statistics. Nor do we need sta tistics to establish a rule that a man engaged in the manufacture of gunpowder shall not smoke a pipe. It is unnecessary to know how many men have been killed or injured in order to determine that such occupations as blasting, window cleaning, or deep diving are danger ous. We know, without referring to figures, that 120 weeks of com pensation, with a $10 weekly maximum, is utterly inadequate to com pensate for the loss of an eye. To present these facts of common rea son and knowledge is not the function o f a statistical department. There are at least four fields in which adequate statistics should be o f material assistance if not indispensable to administrative bodies. They are accident prevention, administration o f compensation, regu lation of insurance rates, and proposals for further legislation. In the first of these functions, accident prevention, the value of statistical records has been more universally appreciated than in other fields. Much could be said on this subject alone, but since this feature wTill be discussed on various occasions during this convention I will treat it very briefly. Many of our States have done safety work for several decades or more. Without question, the requirements o f safeguarding danger ous machinery has prevented some accidents w7hich would have oe48 STATISTICS AS AN AID— W . H . BTJRHOP. 49 curred without the guards. Nevertheless, most of our safety work has not been based upon a statistical analysis of accidents, and with the possible exception of the State of New York, I know of no State which can show from accident figures what the fruit of safety work has been. Many Commonwealths have a record o f the number of acci dents from year to year, but this figure is absolutely meaningless if not correlated with the number of full-time workers exposed to in jury in the various industries. An increase of 20 per cent in the num ber of accidents may actually mean a decrease in the accident rate based upon the number o f men employed, and, conversely, a reduction of 20 per cent may really be an increase if the number of workers ex posed to injury has been decreased in a larger proportion. Taking all industries o f the State, we have at present no information to compare properly even the number of accidents from year to year. To make an intelligent campaign for the prevention of accidents, we must, first o f all, know how accidents occur. What means a detail analysis o f the causes of accidents ? The use and benefit which a table of causes of accidents presents to a safety department is in direct proportion to the detail of the table with proper summaries of similar causes. A statistician gives little information to the safety inquirer when he tells him that 5,000 workmen were injured in falling from elevations, or even that 500 injuries resulted from circular saws. He adds value to his figures when he says that 200 men were injured by fall from ladders or from scaffolds. But even such information is wholly inadequate for the safety man., He must know in greater de tail the circumstances which produced the fall. He must have such information as will enable him to determine how similar accidents can be prevented. Falls from ladders may occur because o f a defec tive rung; the ladder may slip; it may tip over; or the workman may fall because of carrying too heavy a burden. The mode of prevention varies in each one of these various causes. Similarly with the falls from scaffolds. The scaffold itself may fall because of defective con struction or faulty braces; absence of a rail may cause a fa ll; or over loading may cause a collapse. All these separate significant circum stances must be known to prescribe rules and emphasize their im portance. This detail applies to machine accidents as well as nonmachine accidents. I f we told the man on the street that in one year circular saws in Wisconsin were responsible for 405 injuries, causing more than seven-day disability, he at once would picture a man pushing a board through a saw and striking his hand against the fast moving tool. As a matter of fact this conclusion could apply to only 243, or a little over one-half of the total injuries. O f the others, 29 men were injured because they attempted to clean the machine while 124247°— 19------ 4 50 ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS. it was in motion, 67 were struck by so-called 44throw backs,” 9 were injured because their loose clothing was caught, 6 accidents occurred because of oiling the machine, etc. This is the information which is vital for accident prevention. We must know why and how the injury occurred before we can intelligently suggest means of pre vention. To measure the results of safety work we must have records o f exposure. We should know not only the total number of men em ployed in the State, but these numbers should be analyzed by the various industries. Only with this information, correlated with the number of accidents, can we determine the rise or face of our accident curve. To a somewhat less degree, but of great' importance, are records an aid to the man who must approve claim statements or award compensation. This is especially true if permanent partial disabili ties are not compensated on the basis of a fixed schedule, but on the basis of loss of earning power. In such cases the records o f past judgments must serve as a future guide or no uniformity can result. In order to picture the operations of compensation laws and deter mine the administrative efficienc}^, records should show the number o f compensable accidents reported and compensated, classified as to the nature o f injury, the claims which are settled automatically, and those brought before the administration body, or carried through the courts. The time required to dispose of a disputed claim is a test o f efficiency. Claims which are rejected should be classified by grounds o f rejection. Approval or denial of lump-sum statements should be correlated with the reason for such action. The amount o f indemnity and medical aid paid should be tabulated according to the various classes of injuries. The cost of administration, together with legal and all other costs of adjusting claims, is an important item. Here, again, detail must be emphasized. The total number of permanent injuries to the index finger is insufficient; such injuries should be classified by joints at which amputations were made or upon the basis of which the degree of permanent disability was established. The importance of this detail will be apparent when the cost o f future legislation is considered. While most of these suggestions contemplate in a measure a picturization o f the application o f the compensation act, and an account ing o f the work o f the administrative body, statistics are often the basis o f individual claim settlement. In Wisconsin a minor who is permanently injured is compensated upon the basis o f what he could have earned in his occupation, when he attained his majority. Under these conditions, it is important to know what adults in his line o f work are earning. In other words, we must have wage statistics STATISTICS AS A K AID---- W . H . BURHOP. 51 showing the amount of wages paid to men over 21 years- of age in the various industries. As a further illustration of the use of statistics in the adjustment o f claims, presume that a man who has sustained a hernia refuses to submit to an operation. Without such an operation his disability may be indefinite, while an operation would effect a rapid recovery o f earning capacity. It would obviously be unfair to compel an employer or his insurance companies to pay compensation indefinitely under such circumstances. There could be no fairer way to adjust such a claim than to allow compensation for the average period o f disability for similar cases. In Wisconsin we know that the average disability of 491 hernia cases is 41 days, and this offers a basis of settlement. The extent or degree of aid which statistics may offer in the aelministration of compensation must obviously depend upon the man ner in which compensation laws provide far claim adjustment. This is a problem of the individual States, and their statistics should be adjusted in accordance to their specific needs. A discussion of statistics for the regulation of insurance rates may be somewhat out of order because not all of the organizations here represented have supervision over this feature. Unfortunately, some States have no rate regulation laws whatever, or have no means of enforcing them. In no field o f insurance is rate regulation so necessary and so essen tial as in workmen’s compensation. The State is compelling its em ployers to purchase insurance and compels employees to accept what ever coverage their employers may legally secure. In other words, the employer is forced by the State to carry insurance for the benefit o f his employees, but those dependent for their compensation upon the insurance carrier have no voice in the insurance contract* Having made insurance compulsory, the State should in justice protect the employer against excessive or unfair rate charges, and the employees as well as the employer against companies on an inadequate rate basis, which can lead only to insolvency and failure to pay compen sation claims. Further than this, employers should pay into the loss fund a pre mium charge in proportion to their respective hazard. There should be no discrimination between employers whose work presents a simi lar degree of hazard. Some of our States now have on their statute books antidiscriminatory laws, but, because of lack of statistics, administrative bodies themselves have no method of knowing if rates are. right or wrong, fair or unfair, as to classes and employers. Supervision of insurance means nothing whatever unless supervising officials secure the neces 52 ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS. sary information upon which rates must be based. The proper source for this information is the insurance carrier. All that is required is a statement from each company showing the pay roll and clasified losses for each industry class. The reports of the various companies can then be combined into the total class experience for the State. Much time could be given to the discussion o f this subject, but it is here presented only for the thought of those States having no rate regulatory laws or no means for enforcing such. Compensation laws of our States have been passed without ade quate information regarding existing conditions or sufficient under standing o f the problems which such laws were intended to solve. No more convincing proof o f this is needed than the fact that the laws o f practically all the States are amended during every legisla tive session. The application o f the acts are extended and the scale o f benefit is constantly revised upward. In order that such future legislation may be based upon sound experience, it is imperative that detailed records o f compensation and medical payments, classified by nature o f disability, be maintained; also other statistics regarding the scope or adequacy o f the acts. We should be able to determine the extent to which our acts in demnify the actual wage loss. Only from such a tabulation can we determine the adequacy o f the scale o f compensation. The actual wage loss and medical cost compared with the actual benefit received for the various classes o f injuries will picture the adequacy o f our payments. In the wTage loss obviously should be included the wait ing period. Such a tabulation, while o f great importance, does not tell the entire story. I f possible, we should follow our injured men through their lives and learn how large a loss of earning power has resulted on account o f a permanent injury. Most of the States compensate permanent injuries on the basis o f a fixed scale of benefits. These scales are not based upon scientific information and are not designed to compensate fully for the loss o f a member of the body. Even if a scale giving full compensation were attempted, we would not know how to construct it because we have not been farsighted enough to study the actual results of the various permanent disabilities. Not only are we ignorant o f the wage impairment of specific injuries, but we do not even know, except as common sense may dictate, the relative significance of the various kinds of injuries. In Wisconsin the loss o f an arm at the shoulder is compensated by 20 weeks more than the loss o f a leg at the knee. No information is available to establish the relative loss o f earning power which these two disabili ties produce. It is to place a scale of compensation upon an ade quate and balanced basis that statistics of future wage loss are essen tial. STATISTICS AS AN AID---- W . H . B U K H 0P . 53 Changes in the benefits o f a compensation law are largely compro mises between labor and capital. A proposal to reduce the waiting period or increase the maximum is always met with much objection; that the increased cost would be a crippling burden to industry. Unless an analysis of the various kinds o f injuries with the respective benefits is available it is impossible to determine in advance the in creased cost o f any amendment revising the scale upward. I f we have a list of permanent partial disabilities with the cost for each class and changes in the specific number o f weeks are proposed, it is an easy matter to determine the result in cost of proposals. I f we have a correlation o f the number and cost of cases with wages earned, we can readily determine the effect o f a change in the maximum or minimum provisions. An amendment introduced during the 1917 session of the Wisconsin Legislature provided that the fixed benefits o f the scale should be intended to cover only the permanent disability and that the healing period should be compensated for in addition. That is to say, the proposal would have added the healing period to the schedule. To determine the additional cost, all permanent injuries were tabulated according to kind o f inquiry and duration of the healing period. From the tabulation the Wisconsin commission was able to advise the legislative committee o f the increased cost. So with all the other legislative proposals. We need detailed experience of the past to give intelligent advice on further legislation. An abundance o f illustrations could be given to show the real need o f statistics for administrative use. American labor boards must realize more and more the value o f tabulated experience. Much thought and time has been given to this subject by your committee on uniform statistics and insurance cost. It is gratifying to note that many o f the States are already endeavoring to meet the com mittee’s recommendatipns, partly for their own administrative needs and partly to place American statistics on the so-mucli-needed uni form basis. The time will soon be at hand when an adequate statis tical department will be considered an absolute necessity by every organization dealing with compensation and safety laws. Until such time we can not hope to proceed upon a thoroughly scientific basis, using our experience to indicate our errors and guiding us for future improvements. H O W SH O U LD PE R M A N E N T P A R T IA L D IS A B IL IT Y B E COM PENSATED? B Y JO H N M IT C H E L L , C H A IR M A N , N E W YORK ST A TE IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N . Inasmuch as this is a convention in which various States are representedy the provisions o f the compensation law o f New York with reference to the subject o f this paper will be taken as the basis of my remarks. This is done also for the further reason that the present New York statute contains certain amendments which are the out growth o f a considerable experience in compensation matters and which have tended to perfect the requirements o f the law so that as it now stands it is one o f the best laws in the country in respect to the subdivision under discussion and approximates that which I believe will have more or less permanence in compensation laws. What remarks I shall have to make wTill be independent o f the con sideration o f certain general phases o f compensation laws, such as the waiting period, percentage o f compensation allowance, the medical question, and, independent also, o f any suggestions as to the number o f weeks in the specific schedule, etc.* but will be confined strictly to the subject itself. The New York statute is as follows: S. Permanent partial disability. In case of disability, partial in character but permanent in quality, the compensation shall be 66§ per cent of the average weekly wages and shall be paid to the employee for the period named in the schedule, as. follows: Thumb.—For the loss of a thumb, 60 weeks. First finger.— For the loss of a first finger, commonly called index finger, 46 weeks. Second finger.— For the loss of a second finger, 30 weeks. Third finger.— For the loss of a third finger, 25 weeks. Fourth finger.— For the loss of a fourth finger, commonly called the little finger, 15 weeks. Phalange of thumb or finger.— The loss of the first phalange of the thumb or finger shall be considered to be equal to the loss of one-half of such thumb or finger, and compensation shall be one-half of the amount above specified. The loss of more than one phalange shall be considered as the loss of the entire thumb or finger. Where the injury results in the loss of more than one finger, compensation therefor may be awarded for the propor tionate loss of the use of the hand thereby occasioned: Provided, however, That in no case shall the compensation awarded for more than one finger exceed the amount provided in this schedule for the loss of a hand. Great toe.— For the loss of a great toe, 88 weeks. 54 P E R M A N E N T P A R TIA L D ISA B IL ITY — J O H N M IT C H E L L . 55 Other toes.— F or the loss of one o f the toes other than the great toe, 16 weeks. Phalange o f toe.— The loss o f the first phalange o f any toe shall be con sidered to be equal to the loss o f one-half o f said toe, and the compensation shall be one-half o f the amount specified. The loss o f more than one phalange shall be considered as the loss o f the entire toe. W here the injury results in the loss o f more than one toe compensation therefor may be awarded fo r the proportionate loss o f the use o f the foot thereby occa sion ed: Provided, how ever, That in no case shall the compensation awarded for more than one toe exceed the amount provided in this schedule fo r the loss o f the foot. Hand.— The loss o f a hand, 244 weeks. Arm.— For the loss o f an arm, 312 weeks. Foot.— For the loss o f a foot, 205 weeks. Leg.— F or the loss o f a leg, 288 weeks. Eye.— For the loss o f an eye, 128 weeks. Loss o f use.— Permanent loss o f the use o f a hand, arm, foot, leg, eye, thumb, finger, toe, or phalange shall be considered as the equivalent o f the loss o f such hand, arm, foot, leg, eye, thumb, finger, toe, or phalange. Partial loss and partial loss o f use.— F or the partial loss or the partial loss o f the use o f a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye compensation therefor may be awarded fo r the proportionate loss or proportionate loss o f the use o f such hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye. Amputations.— Am putation between the elbow and the w rist shall be con sidered as the equivalent o f the loss o f a hand. Am putation between the knee and the ankle shall be considered as the equivalent o f the loss o f a foot. Amputation at or above the elbow shall be considered as the loss o f an arm. Amputation at or above the knee shall be considered as the loss o f the leg. The compensation for the foregoing specific injuries shall be in lieu o f all other compensation, except the benefits provided in section 13 o f this chapter. In case o f an injury resulting in serious fa cia l or head disfigurement the commission may, in its discretion, make such award or compensation as it may deem proper and equitable in view o f the nature o f the disfigurement, but not to exceed $3,500. Other cases.— In all other eases in this class o f disability the compensation shall be 66§ per cent o f the difference between his average weekly wages and his wage-earning capacity thereafter in the same employment or otherwise, payable during the continuance o f such partial disability, but subject to recon sideration o f the degree o f such impairment by the commission on its own motion or upon application o f any party in interest. 4. Tem porary partial disability.— In case o f tem porary partial disability, except the particular cases mentioned in subdivision 3 o f this section, an injured employee shall receive 66 § per cent o f the difference between his average weekly wages and his wage-earning capacity thereafter in the same employment or otherwise during the continuance o f such partial disability, but not to exceed when combined with his decreased earnings the amount o f wages he was receiving prior to the injury, and not to exceed in total the sum o f $3,500, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. (This paragraph is also incorporated as reference to it will be made below.) 5. and eye, tion Lim itation.— The compensation payment under subdivisions 1, 2, and 4 under subdivision 3, except in case o f the loss o f a hand, arm, foot, leg, or shall not exceed $15 per week nor be less than $5 per w eek ; the compensa payment under subdivision 3 in case o f the loss o f a hand, arm, foot, leg, 56 A D M IN IST R A TIV E PRO BLEM S. or eye shall not exceed $20 per week nor be less than $5 a w e e k : Provided, however, That i f the em ployee’s wages at the time o f injury are less than $5 per week he shall receive his full weekly wages. 6. Previous disability.— The fact that an employee has suffered previous dis ability or received compensation therefor shall not preclude him from com pensation for a later injury nor preclude compensation for death resulting th erefrom ; but in determining compensation for the later injury or death his average weekly wages shall be such sum as w ill reasonably represent his earning capacity at the time o f the later in ju r y : Provided, how ever, That an employee who is suffering from a previous disability shall not receive com pensation fo r a later in ju ry in excess o f the compensation allowed for such in ju ry when considered by itself and not in conjunction with the previous disability. 7. Permanent total disability after permanent partial disability.— I f an employee who has previously incurred permanent partial disability through the loss o f one hand, one arm, one foot, one leg, or one eye incurs permanent total disability through the loss o f another member or organ, he shall be paid, in addition to the compensation for permanent partial disability pro vided in this section and after the cessation o f the payments for the pre scribed period o f weeks, special additional compensation for the remainder o f his life to the amount o f 66f per cent o f the average wTeekly wage earned by him at the time the total permanent disability was incurred. Such additional compensation shall be paid out o f a special fund created for such purpose in the follow ing m a n n er: The insurance carrier shall pay to the State treasurer fo r every case o f injury causing death in w hich there are no persons entitled to compensation the sum o f $100. The State treasurer shall be the custodian o f this special fund, and the commission shall direct the distribution thereof. First, let me call your attention to the fact that the schedule herein is a well-balanced schedule, and that relatively the economic value of the various members seems to be properly stated. However, in the administration of the lawT, we always have given consideration to the vocational element to modify the rigidity o f the schedule. This is recognizing the spirit of the law as well as the letter. I f I were drafting a new' statute I should introduce an element o f discretion on the part of the hearing tribunal, allowing an increase, say, up to 33J per cent for vocational reasons alone. In the consideration of the vocational element the New York commission has not diminished any award on such account, but has been more liberal in its interpretation of the schedule in numerous instances, o f course, being bound at all times by the statutory limi tations. There was a time when our statute compelled us to consider any injury short o f loss of or loss of use of a member as a simple disability case in which payments should be made covering the period o f disability only; but, by the very necessary amendment the com mission now has power to make an award on proportionate loss of use o f member. Indeed, even before such amendment, the commis sion followed this practice, which was not objected to in minor cases, but which finally came to be seriously objected to in the more expensive cases until a court decision prevented a continuance of the* P E R M A N E N T PA R T IA L D ISA B IL ITY ---- J O H N M IT C H E L L . 57 practice. To illustrate wliat hardship might result in the absence o f such provision, I will cite a case in the New York jurisdiction. It was one in which there had been an eye injury followed by an operation for cataract with a result of loss o f binocular vision, co ordination o f vision of the two eyes being lacking. It was even true that the claimant could see better at his work with his injured eye covered with a patch; but inasmuch as, in the event of the subse quent loss of the uninjured eye, the injured eye would be useful if for no other reason than to give a field of vision and enable the injured person to get around, the court held that there was no loss of use of eye. The case, therefore, was reduced to one of simple disability, in which a few weeks’ compensation was paid while the injured eye was healing; so that we have the situation of one who for vocational pur poses had lost one eye receiving less compensation for it than if he had lost his little finger. Such an adjudication must rest in its last analysis-upon the assumption that the injured eye will subsequently be lost; whereas such instances are exceptionally rare. Such a statute is not satisfactory either in its particular or in its general applica tion and, plainly, laws should be so drafted or amended as to allow justice to be done in the circumstances. It is manifestly a wise provision to give discretionary powers to the hearing tribunal to make an award for the proportionate loss of use of hand or foot or arm when certain portions of them are lost, for not only is the part lost but likewise does its loss impair the gen eral utility of the member when considered as a whole. There is justification also for granting compensation for certain disfigurements, for they result in impaired earning capacity quite as certainly as does the loss o f a member or part of a member. It is a wise provision o f any law that gives to the claimant who is willing to return to work, but who is 'compelled to accept a lower wage because o f his disability and during his disability, two-thirds of the difference between his old and new wage with certain maxi mum limitations. It tends to do away with malingering and en courages recovery; more than that, it is simple justice. It is also proper to increase the maximum compensation in cases o f the loss of a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye, for the obvious reason that these are such serious injuries, attended with such great loss and inconvenience through life that they should be more amply compen sated. In this connection, I may say that we are not apt to err in this respect, because the whole scheme of compensation is still well within the limitation of justice. New York did wisely in amending her law to give compensation for permanent total disability in cases in which a claimant loses a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye, having previously suffered the loss of one or more members. The totality is no more chargeable to the last acci 58 /JD M IX IS T R A T IV E PROBLEM S. dent than to the first, for it is the combination o f injuries which produces the totality. It is therefore unjust to charge the last employer with totality, whereas it would be unjust to deprive the workman of the benefit of his award for total disability. The proper rule, there fore, would seem to be to charge the present employer with the re sults o f the last accident and to throw the combination result o f to tality upon industry as a whole. This may be done by adding a small additional rate upon every risk or, as New York has done it, by col lecting in each death case in which there are no dependents a fixed sum o f $100, which contribution seems sufficient to establish a fund to take care o f the permanent total cases. One splendid effect of this amendment was to do away with the objection of employers to employing or reemploying crippled or defective workmen. The latter have a natural right to earn a livelihood. At the same time, employers were somewhat justified in their precautions. Now, crip ples will be employed for what they are worth, and any objection to employing them has its answering advantage. So, it turns out that after the first fear is over, that cripples are being employed or, at least, are not rejected because of any provisions of the compensation law o f New York State. Dismissing the specific schedule, let us turn to the other perma nent partial disabilities which are very numerous. I have in mind those cases o f stiff elbows, arms that can not be fully elevated, wrists that have lost their suppleness, ankylosed fingers, inverted or everted feet, knees that have lost their flexion, etc. The statutory method of paying compensation in such cases is to provide two-thirds of the difference between the old wrage and the new. The administrative difficulties are numerous: Suppose the claimant refuses to return to vrork; here we have the discussion thrown upon the theoretical plane, one party contending that he is able to work, another that he is unable to work, and all the time perhaps no job in sight. Manifestly, compensation prob lems are practical problems and methods of adjudication should always be at hand and susceptible among other things of finality; but who has the ability properly to determine the question? Suppose industrial conditions change and the injured workman is able to earn more money than he was earning at the time of the accident; shall we say in justice that he should go through life with a stiff arm without any compensation for it ? Or suppose the industrial conditions change so that because of the change alone he earns $8, whereas he might have earned $12 if con ditions had remained as they were at the time of his accident. Shall the employer or the insurance carrier be compelled to increase compensation for reasons quite apart from the employment or the injury or its effect? P E R M A N E N T P A R TIA L D ISA B IL ITY ---- J O H K M IT C H E L L . 59 Or suppose conditions of intermittent employment in which the injured workman is sometimes employed and sometimes not; is the administrative bureau to be burdened with a rehearing of the case upon all such occasions ? And, yet, if this be the method there is no escape from the endless rehearings of cases which as the years go by will aggregate a vast number. The method followed in New York in such cases is to allow the workman and the employer (or his insurance carrier) to present them selves before the commission with a proposition to adjudicate com pensation by a single payment commuting all future payments. More than 5,000 cases a year are thus adjusted. Such a method veritably forced itself upon the commission and there seems to be no other satisfactory method o f adjudicating these cases. What are the defects o f such a plan? Manifestly they are tw o: First, the danger o f introducing the 46settlement,” so called, in which the obnoxious element o f the old plan may be perpetuated. Second, the danger which always attends the giving o f compensation in a lump sum against which is the general tendency of all compensation laws. W ith respect to the settlement feature this is entirely avoided by the commission’s active interest in every such case. To guarantee ade quate compensation the practice in New York is for the commission to pass an independent judgment on the matter regardless of the amount agreed upon and if the latter be not as much or more than the amount the commission thinks should be paid and received, the proposal is not accepted and approved and the parties are urged to raise the amount; otherwise, the case goes back upon the impaired earning capacity basis. W ith respect to allowing the payment in one lump sum this is found to be a not undesirable element in this particular class o f cases, but the commission should order its payment periodically where there is indication that it otherwise might be wasted. From this a general approval of lump-sum payments should not be in ferred, for as a rule the periodical payments effect the greater good and it is wisdom to continue them; but in the particular class of cases it is very often the only practical way o f meeting the situation. “ A R IS IN G BY OUT OF AND IN C O U R S E O F E M P L O Y M E N T .” GEO RG E A . K I N G S T O N , C O M M I S S I O N E R , W ORKMEN’S C O M P E N S A T IO N BOARD OF O N T A R IO . Perhaps no expression made use of in compensation laws has been the subject o f more consideration and discussion by administering boards and law courts than that which constitutes the subject o f this paper. People sometimes say that the modern compensation law provides for compensation in case of all work accidents regardless o f the ques tion o f negligence, and that probably is the general conception o f the law, but in 39 out of the 48 jurisdictions on this continent (i. e., 4 0 1 in the United States and 8 in Canada) where a workman’s com pensation law is in force there is ingrafted upon the more general expression o f the law the provision that an accident to entitle a workman to compensation must have happened in course o f and must also have arisen out of his employment. The eight jurisdictions whose laws do not include this expression are Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, Wiscon sin, Wyoming, and the United States. I will briefly state the expressions used in the laws of these States in lieu o f the uniform wording o f the other laws in this respect: O h i o .— “ A ll injuries not self-inflicted received in course of employ ment.” P e n n s y l v a n i a .—“ Injury by accident in course of employment.” T e x a s .— “ Personal injury sustained in course of employment.” W a s h i n g t o n .— “ Personal injury whether received upon the premi ses or at the plant or in the course o f employment while aw^ay from the establishment.” W e s t V i r g i n i a .—“ A ll personal injuries not the result o f willful misconduct or intoxication o f employee or self-inflicted.” W i s c o n s i n .—“ Personal injury while performing service growing out o f and incidental to the employment, not intentionally self-in flicted.” W y o m i n g .—“ Personal injuries as a result of employment and not due to culpable negligence o f injured employee or to the willful act o f a third person due to reasons personal to such employee or because o f his employment.” 1 Including Alaska and the Federal Government. €0 ARISIN G OUT OF E M P L O Y M E N T ---- GEORGE A. K IN G ST O N . 61 U n it e d S t a t e s . —“ Personal injury sustained while in the perform ance o f duty.” It will be readily seen that in a number o f cases this expression uArising out of and in course o f employment ” substantially modifies the general principle that all work accidents are compensable, re gardless o f negligence or fault on the part of the workman. These may be conveniently enumerated under the following head ings : 1. Street accidents. 2. Accidents while going to or from work. 3. Injuries due to scuffling, larking, or horseplay. 4. Accidents, as sometimes stated in legal textbooks, caused by the act o f God or the country’s enemies. 5. Injuries arising out o f attempted robbery, fighting, assault, murder, or suicide. 6. Disabilities due to frostbite or heat stroke. 7. Accidents occurring during moments o f leisure or while doing something o f a personal nature or out of curiosity. 8. Camp accidents. 9.1 Accidents resulting in the aggravation of a preexisting diseased condition, or extraordinary conditions amounting almost to accident, resulting in disease, as e. g., pneumonia resulting from exposure. 10.1 Accidents due to disobedience o f rules. 11.1 Hernia, lumbago, and strain cases. One could go on almost indefinitely classifying occurrences which seem to fall outside the commonly accepted idea of “ work accident,” but the above list comprises the great bulk of cases presenting prob-~ lems which administering boards and commissions are constantly confronted with, and it is the purpose o f this paper to discuss some o f the principles underlying the decisions in cases coming under these headings. STREET ACCIDENTS. Prior to the decision o f the House of Lords in the case of Dennis v . .White, June 14, 1917, there was a fairly well-settled line of decisions in England in regard to street accidents, to the effect, briefly stated, that if a workman is on the public highway on his master’s business and becomes injured by accident due to ordinary street hazard, such an injury is not compensable, because it could not be said that the accident arose out o f his employment, or, in other words, as some of the judges expressed it, it was due to a risk no greater than is run by all members o f the public. One of the leading cases in which this principle of law was ex pounded wTas the famous banana skin case, Sheldon v . Needham, 1 Consideration of decisions under this head is not included in this paper. 62 A D M IN IST R A T IV E PRO BLEM S. 7 B. W. C. C. 471> where an employer sent his servant to post a letter at a box a few yards along the street. While performing this duty, she slipped on a banana skin carelessly thrown on the sidewalk and broke her leg. For the reasons stated above it was ultimately held by the court o f appeals that the employer was not liable. The New York Supreme Court, in the case o f Newman v . Newman, took the same view, and the idea seems to have been accepted in quite a number o f the other States. It was held in another English case, Pierce v . Provident (1911), 4 B. W. C. C. 242, that in order to make the employer liable in the case o f street accidents employment in the streets must be practically continuous, as in the case of a canvasser or collector, the reason for drawing the distinction being thus expressed by the master of the rolls: As the w ork requires him to spend the greater part o f the day on the streets he would be, in the course o f his duties, beyond all doubt more exposed to the risks o f the street than ordinary members o f the public. The Scottish courts, however, held a different view. As one of the judges put it: The risk o f the road at the particular time was a risk incidental to the em ployment, and it was none the less a risk o f the employment because every pedestrian on the road at that time ran the same risk, or because the workm an was facing this risk fo r the first or perhaps the only time. Very early in the administration of the law in Ontario, i. e., in 1915, the board was called upon to decide this identical question. A man employed by one of the cartage agents in Toronto was sent to a harness maker’s shop some few blocks away to get a horse collar which had been left there for repairs, and on the way back slipped on the sidewalk and broke his arm. Our board, while entertaining the most profound respect for the decision of the English courts, is not bound to follow them, and the reasons as stated in the Sheldon case in regard to these street cases did not appear to us to be sound. We finally decided to adopt the view expressed by the Scottish courts and allowed the claim. It was, you may be sure, quite interesting to note that the House • of Lords a couple of years later in the case first above referred to, Dennis v . White, 10 B. W. C. C. 280, discarded the theory or rule previously laid down by the English court of appeal as applying to this type of case and adopted the view expressed by the Scottish courts. The written judgment of Lord Chancellor Finlay in this case deals very fully with all the prior decisions o f importance on this subject and refers to the reasoning o f these earlier decisions as unsound and antagonistic to the terms of the statute. AR ISIN G OUT OF E M P L O Y M E N T — GEORGE A. K IN G ST O N . 63 I have had the opportunity o f reading the written opinion o f the chairman o f the Nova Scotia board, Mr. Y. J. Patton, in the matter o f the claims arising out o f the Halifax disaster o f December last. The reasoning in the case o f Dennis v . White was adopted, and it was held that claims in respect to killed or injured workmen in Hali fax on that occasion should be taken as coming under the provisions o f the act, it being considered that the injury arose out o f the employ ment because, by reason of the nearness o f the city to the shipping in the harbor where high explosives were handled, all workmen in the city, whether engaged on the street, in the factory, or 011 the piers, were specially exposed to that particular danger. ACCIDENTS W HILE GOING- TO OR FROM WORK. Somewhat closely related to the problem of compensation for in juries in street accidents is that as to accidents happening while go ing to or from work. It is, I think, fairly generally held that after a workman leaves the employer’s premises on quitting work or before he reaches the premises on going to work, he is not in the course o f his employment, and an accident happening to him on the street dur ing these periods could not be said to arise out o f his employment. The New York commission in one case went a step farther and rejected the claim of an office employee, who on finishing her day’s work took some o f her employer’s letters to deposit in the post office and on the way was struck by a train. The reason stated for this decision is 44that she was following the same route that she would have followed if she had been going home without undertaking to mail the letters and that she was exposed to no unusual hazard due to the employment.” This sounds rather like the argument formerly given effect to in England prior to the decision o f the House of Lords in Dennis v . White above referred to. It seems to me such a case should turn on whether or not she was in the performance o f her duties. I f it was her duty to go to the post office on this message, then for the* time being the hazard of the street was a hazard of her employment and her duties for her employer were not ended till she deposited the letters in the post office. A number of cases ha\;e arisen where a workman is injured going to or from work by means o f a conveyance provided by the employer. The question to be determined in all such cases is, Was it an express or implied term o f the contract o f service that the workman was to be so carried to or from his work? It seems to be well-settled law in England that if a workman is entitled either by express or implied contract to travel in a conveyance provided by the employer he is in the course o f his employment, and an accident while so traveling would be held to have arisen out of the employment even though he 64 A D M IN IST R A TIV E PROBLEM S. is not on the employer’s time till the place of actual work is reached. Both California and Massachusetts have held to this effect also in cases reported from those States. We had one case in which we allowed the claim of a workman who was injured on the steps at the entrance to the building, part of which was occupied by the employer. We held that in renting a room or suite of rooms in a building the common entrance to the building should be considered in this connection as part of the employer’s premises, and the hazard of the steps was a hazard peculiar to the employer’s premises. The Supreme Court of Massachusetts held to the same effect in a case which recently came before them, In re Sundine, 105 N. E. 433. The following are a few additional cases of this class which have come before the Ontario board: Allowed— W here the forem an o f a teaming company, when quitting w ork in evening at sand pit, got on one o f his em ployer’s w agons to ride into town, jum ped off wagon at his street intersection, and was hurt by passing auto. W here a workm an employed by a railw ay at terminal yards about 4 miles out side the city was killed by train which he was about to board in the city to take him to his work. Usual custom for railw ay to carry men to their w ork at this point. Board considered case arose out o f employment though w orkm an’s time did not actually start until arrival at work. W here a man going to w ork in a lumber yard which adjoins railw ay tracks w as killed by passing train as he was crossing the tracks to work. Considered he had reached the ambit o f his employment. W here a man on engineer’s staff going into a lumber camp from town— pay started when he left town— broke through ice and drowned. W here a car inspector who had evidently finished his day’s w ork threequarters o f an hour before usual quitting time came into town as per usual custom by com pany’s train. Evidently jumped off or jerked off near station, though no one saw accident. Body found alongside track. W here a man employed by one o f the tenants o f a building entered the eleva tor in common use by all tenants o f the building, and, instead o f w aiting for the operator, pulled the rope him self and was killed. Considered that the ele vator was part o f the premises rented and constituted one o f the hazards o f the business. W here a man employed by a cartage agent was out plow ing on a farm near town for a customer. On way home from work horses ran away. Not allotved— W here a man had been told the night before to go down to get w ork at an elevator in the morning. W hile on the way to work along railw ay track near the place where he was to be employed, about 9.30 or 10 a. m., he was hurt by train. W here a man going from w ork in the woods instead o f taking the com pany’s bush road came out on railw ay track and was killed by train. W here a railw ay workm an on bridge w ork had been given a ticket home for Christmas holidays and return. On returning he jumped off the train at about the place where his w ork would be and was injured. This w ould have saved him a walk back from the station o f about a mile. ARISIN G OUT OF E M P L O Y M E N T ---- GEORGE A. K IN G ST O N . W here a man w orking fo r a railw ay as section man, after quitting w ork in evening, jumped on passing freight to go down the yard to where he had hung his coat when starting w ork and w as injured. W here a man having met w ith a certain in ju ry the day before asked leave at 11 a. m. to go tw o or three blocks along street to an emergency hospital to get injury dressed. This took him across railw ay tracks. On returning, find ing a train blocking the crossing, he attempted to climb through and got foot cut off. INJURIES DUE TO SCUFFLING, LARKING, OR HORSEPLAY. There have been a variety of opinions expressed on this type of .case both in England and on this continent. It was held in the recent case (1916) of Parsons v . Somerset, 9 B. W. C. C. 532, that where a railway porter in the course o f his employment met with an accident due to his getting on the foot board o f a car after the train started, not for any object o f his em ployment but purely for his own pleasure (larking with two young ladies on the train), he was not entitled to compensation. In another case, Wrigley v . Nasmythe, where a workman who went for some purpose to a fellow workman in the shop, on parting tapped his friend on the back with a rule, and received a push in return from which he was injured, it was held by the court o f appeal that the accident did not arise out of the employment. Our board in Ontario has adopted the rule in these cases that if the injured workman is an active,, participant in the scuffling or horseplay he is not entitled to compensation, but if while going about his duties he is the victim o f another’s prank, to which he is not in the least a party, we do not deny him compensation. I note the following cases from my records coming under this heading: Allowed— W here a Chinaman employed in a factory was the innocent victim o f horse play— blown up by hose. W here a man who had been teased by another workman suddenly turned in revenge and hit an innocent party. WThere a man about to punch the time clock w as hit from behind by another workman. Injured man innocent o f any horseplay. W here a man in line up for the time clock w as pushed out o f Une by another workman, and to prevent him self from falling, as w ell as to save his place in the line, he grabbed the workm an and his hand came in contact with a sharp knife in the latter’s hand. Not allowed— W here, when a man splashed a little water over another workman, the latter in trying to avoid the wrater turned suddenly and, having hose in his hand, turned it on the man who first started the horseplay. 124247°— 19------- 5 66 A D M IN IST R A T IV E PR O B L E M S. INJURIES ARISING OUT OF AN ACT OJF GOD OR THE COUNTRY’S ENEMIES. Under this heading about the only type o f case in which the question has arisen is that due to lightning, but there have been a few cases reported during the last two or three years in England arising out o f bombardments by enemy ships or airplanes. In regard to lightning, the State boards or courts are not by any means uniform in their decisions and it can scarcely be said that there is in this country anything like a well-settled opinion. The Supreme Court o f Michigan recently held that a railway sec tion man, who sought shelter from a storm in an adjacent barn which wras struck by lightning and who was injured, was not entitled to compensation, basing this decision on the argument that the risk was not different from the risk run by other members o f the com munity. The Supreme Court o f Wisconsin also held that where a man work ing on a dam was killed by lightning, it was not a case for compensa tion. The Supreme Court o f Minnesota, however, toot an opposite view and allowed compensation to a workman who was injured by light ning while seeking shelter under a tree at the time o f a storm. In those jurisdictions where only the first of the two conditions are required— that is, injury by accident during the course o f employ ment, omitting “ arising out of, etc.”—there can, of course, be no question, as an injury by lightning is certainly an accident and if this injury takes place during the period o f work the condition is complete. I should scarcely have thought that it could be argued where a man goes into a building or under a tree to seek temporary shelter from a storm, that he has therefore left the employment, yet this point did arise in the supreme courts of both New York and Minnesota, and it was held that thus temporarily seeking shelter was not leaving the employment but rather was incidental to it. The decisions in England in lightning cases turn on the question of special risk. Thus, for example, a steeple jack repairing a flag pole is considered to be specially exposed to the danger o f lightning; likewise a man working on the top o f a high scaffold was considered exposed to special danger and compensation was allowed. But where a roadman engaged in his ordinary occupation on the highway was struck by lightning, it was held that there was no special exposure to the danger o f lightning and compensation was refused. It amounts to practically this in England, that in all lightning cases the claimant must prove by positive evidence that the circum stances o f the employment exposed the employee to a greater risk than that run by persons not so employed or not so employed under the same conditions. A RISIN G O UT OF E M P L O Y M E N T -----GEORGE A. K IN G S T O N . 6 f The bombardment cases in England turn on much the same point as the lightning cases, viz, the question o f special risk or special ex posure due to the employment. In this connection dicta by Lord Chancellor Finlay in the Dennis v . White case above cited are o f interest. He says: In the case o f injury by bomb thrown from hostile aircraft, the fa ct that workm an w as engaged on w ork on a building brilliantly lighted so as to attract the notice o f enemy crew s might be most m aterial as show ing that the in ju ry by the bomb was one which arises out o f the employment. It was actually held in one case (Allcock v . Rogers, W . ST., Decem ber, 1917, p. 353) where a servant' in a hotel, whose duties were, among other things, to polish the brass name or sign plate 011 the outside o f the building, was injured by the explosion o f a bomb dropped in the street a short distance away, that this did not arise out o f the employment, or, in other words, that the workman was not exposed to any special risk incident to his employment. In the famous Hartlepool case (Cooper v . N. E. Ry. Co.) the decision was similar. In that case an engineer, having left his engine to seek shelter while the bombardment was on, ventured back to open the injector in order to prevent damage to the fire box and upon returning again to shelter was injured by a bomb. It was held by the court o f appeal that this injury did not arise out o f his employment. As a master of the rolls expressed it: The claim ant must prove that he was exposed by the nature o f his employ ment to some special or peculiar risk beyond that o f other inhabitants o f Hartlepool. The w hole town w as within range o f the guns and there w as no evidence or suggestion that they w ere directed at any particular spot. INJURIES DUE TO ATTEMPTED ROBBERY, FIGHTING, ASSAULT, MURDER, OR SUICIDE. I suppose every administering board has occasion frequently to determine cases coming under this heading, and from all the reports I have been able to read it seems quite a generally accepted principle of law in every jurisdiction that where a workman in the discharge o f his duty is assaulted either by another workman or by a stranger in attempted robbery of the employer’s premises, compensation should be allowed. A border-line case, however, arose in Massachusetts and compensa tion was denied. In this case a night watchman wras shot by mistake by officers pursuing burglars wt1io had committed robbery in the neighborhood and were being pursued. There was no suggestion that robbery o f the premises claimant was guarding was feared, and he was not fired upon because o f his employment, but clearly through mistake. The court held that the injury did not arise out of the employment. £8 A D M IN IST R A T IV E PRO BLEM S. The Supreme Court of New Jersey also refused compensation in the case of a delivery man and collector who wTas shot by an unknown person for an unknown cause while in the performance of his duties. There was no attempt at robbery, though claimant had money on his person, and it was held that the shooting was not in any way connected with the employment. We had a rather unsual case in Ontario about a year ago which is also close to the border line, but our board allowed the claim. A night watchman was found dead in the morning, sitting in a chair in the office o f his employer, shot through the head, apparently by his own gun. There was nothing which would warrant the con clusion that it was a case o f suicide, but on the contrary it seemed probable that he had been engaged in cleaning the gun, though there w as no positive evidence as to this. It was a case in which the board was obliged either to infer suicide or accidental discharge o f the gun while cleaning it, and the latter inference seemed the proper one. It is equally well settled, I think, that where the assault which results in the injury arises out o f a dispute or quarrel purely per sonal to the workman and not associated with his employment, com pensation should not be allowed. The distinction may be thus illustrated: Where a foreman is assaulted and injured while trying to compel a discharged workman to leave the place of his former employment, I think that the claim should be allowed. This was an actual case in California. On the other hand, and this is a case from our own Province, a street-car conductor in resenting what he considered a personal insult directed at him by a soldier passenger abused the soldier rather badly. The latter, upon going to his camp nearby, reported the affair to his soldier companions, whereupon a number o f them returned, boarded this conductor’s car as it was returning and beat him up, causing severe personal injury. W e held that this was a purely personal quarrel and that the injury thus sustained did not arise out of the employment. In another case which came before us, two workmen got into a dispute over some material or tools required in connection with their w ork and, wTords finally leading to blows, one of them was quite seriously injured. This one appeared to be the least to blame o f the two, yet he did actively participate in the scrap. We held that the dispute was a purely personal one between these two men, and as the interests of the employer were in no way involved or concerned the injuries could not be said to have arisen out o f the employment. We also rejected a claim in a case where a boy was found dead at his place of work with a loop o f rope around his neck, as the circumstances pointed to suicide rather than accident. A R ISIN G OU T OF E M P L O Y M E N T — GEORGE A . K IN G S T O N . 69 INJURIES DUE TO EROSTBITE OR HEAT STROKE. The cases coming under this heading turn upon the same considera tion as the lightning and bombardment cases above noted, viz, the question of special exposure. In the Warner v . Couchman case, decided by the House of Lords in England in 1911, a baker whose duty was to drive a bread-delivery cart was frost bitten in the hand. The county court judge held that there was nothing in the employment which exposed him to more than the ordinary risk o f cold to which every person working in the open air was exposed on that day, and consequently the injury did not arise out o f the employment. The House of Lords held that the decision o f the county court judge on this question o f fact was final. Important dicta by one of the appeal court judges, however, are quoted in the House of Lords with favor as expressing the point of view with which he says judges should approach cases of this kind: W here w e deal w ith natural causes affecting a considerable area, such as severe weather,-we are bound to consider whether the accident arose out o f the employment or was merely a consequence o f the severity o f the weather to which persons in the locality, whether so employed or not, were equally exposed. I f it is the latter, it does not arise out o f the employment because the man is not specially affected by the severity o f the weather by reason o f his employ ment. In the case of Dennis v . White, above referred to, which leversecl the old line of decisions in regard to street accidents, Lord Chancellor Finlay, in referring to frostbite and sunstroke cases as distinguished from ordinary street accidents, says: In such cases it is material to show that the wTork involves special exposure to the heat or cold. W here the risk is one shared by all men, whether in or ou t o f the employment, in order to show that the accident arose out o f the employ ment, it must be established that special exposure to it is involved. In regard to heat stroke, there are two English authorities in which the principles governing these cases were fully considered— one in the House of Lords in 1908 (The Ismay v . Williamson case) and the other in the court o f appeal in 1914 (Maskery v . Lancashire). These were both shipping cases. In the one a stoker was overcome with heat while trimming the fires and in the other a young man not in the best o f health who had shipped as an engineer on a vessel bound for Singapore, while sailing in the southern part o f the Red Sea, was overcome by heat and died. In both cases the court held that death was due to accident arising out o f the employment, and it did not affect the situation to say that the man was not robust enough to stand the tropical heat. It was sufficient to find that the work in the engine room or boiler room exposed the workman to excessive heat, which was far greater than that to which ordinary sailors whose duty does not take them into the engine room were subjected. 70 A D M IN IST R A TIV E PRO BLEM S. We had a ease o f frostbite in Ontario last winter which the board allowed. A railway workman was sent out with an auxiliary crew to clear a wreck— weather 30° below zero. He was put at the job of flagging and was so engaged three or four hours, with the result that his legs and feet were very badly frozen. Under these circumstances it was considered accidental injury arising out of the employment. ACCIDENTS OCCURRING DURING MOMENTS OF LEISURE OR W H IL E DOING SOMETHING 03? A PERSONAL NATURE. Cases coming under this heading are very numerous and their deci sion must necessarily turn on the particular circumstances in each case. In England^ as well as in all the jurisdictions on this side whose reports I have had the opportunity o f reading, there is quite a latitude allowed workmen in respect to moments o f leisure during the eourse o f employment. The crew o f a train, for example, waiting at a switch to make a crossing; a sailor in a river boat waiting for the tide; a machine operator waiting for material which he is dependent on another workman to bring to him ; a trainman having a few hours between arrival at terminal and departure on return journey—one can easily imagine a variety o f cases o f this type, where the work man is clearly in the course o f his employment but for the time being has no duties to perform for the employer. T o quote M ilton: “ They also serve who only stand and wait.” The question to be asked in every such case is, Did the workman oc cupy those moments of leisure reasonably, having regard to all the circumstances ? If, during such an interval of waiting, he meets with an accident while engaged in some occupation or amusement which is unconnected with his employment, or which adds to the risk to which he would otherwise be subject, judges in the main agree that compensation should not be allowed; but what one may reasonably do, o f a personal nature and which is not in conflict with specific instructions, should not be held as taking a man outside the scope o f his employment for purposes o f compensation in the event o f accident while so occupied. The following decisions am noted in this connection: The New Jer sey Supreme Court allowed a claim where a workman was killed while crossing railway tracks near the plaee o f his employment to the toilet in common use by workmen in the employer’s service. The Supreme Court o f Massachusetts held that a compositor who went out on the roof on a hot night for fresh air and was injured by mak ing a misstep was entitled to compensation. The California commis sion went so far as to hold that a .eook was entitled to compensation^ where he left the kitchen to smoke for a time on the adjoining porch, and on attempting to return opened the wrong door and fell down stairs. A R ISIN G OUT OF E M P LO lrM E N T ---- GEORGE A. KINGSTON. 71 There is one decision, however, reported from Iowa, which I think is carrying this idea o f personal liberty at the expense o f the em ployer too far. In that case a workman was allowed compensation who undertook to light his pipe while his hands were moist with gasoline, with which he had been cleaning his clothing. We have had a variety o f these personal and leisure-moment cases before our board, quite a number o f them arising out o f accidents occurring to workmen while remaining on the employer’s premises during the luncheon hour. I note among them the following: Allowed— W here a woman w orker boiled water fo r tea on a gas jet near her w ork and it boiled over or was knocked over causing injury. W here a boy, 14, w orking in a planing mill, being desirous o f fixing up a small block o f w ood fo r his own use, took it to a saw to cut it to the desired shape and got his thumb cut off. W here a scavenger, w orking for city, found tw o electric bulbs in garbage and out o f curiosity cracked them together and lost an eye. W here a section man, who had gone into city on his speeder to get his pay check, w as found dead on the track, evidently run down by train on w ay home. W here a workm an being dusted off by another workman, by means o f air hose, gets an internal charge and dies o f peritonitis. W here a workman paid 50 cents a week extra to engage in fire drill for the em ployers’ voluntary fire department w as injured w hile so drilling. W here a boy employed on a vessel having some leisure time, while the vessel is tied up at a certain w harf, in chasing a rat w hich appears on the w harf, trips into the w ater and is drowned. W here a laborer engaged in certain building w ork went into the shop or tool house to take shelter from a storm, and w hile there undertook to sharpen a fellow w orkm an’s chisel. W hen done, w ent to turn off switch, and w as electro cuted. W here a man on quitting work went to boiler for a pail o f w ater with which to wash, slipped, and scalded himself. W here a man in a mill having a moment o f leisure went to another part o f the plant to pay a small board bill to a fellow workman [and was in ju red]. Not allowed— W here a man, seeing an adjoining machine idle and being curious to know how it works, attempted to operate it and got his thumb cut off, W here a workm an sleeping at noon hour on em ployer’s premises, took a lit and rolled against a hot steam pipe. W here a boy went out o f his way to grind his ja ck knife on a machine where he had no business to be and was injured. W here a man working on repairs on a ship, whose living quarters were on the ship, left his boat in the evening to spend the evening visiting his brother on another vessel alongside, owned by the same company, and was injured w hile leaving this other vessel late at night. W here a workm an taking a bath on em ployer’s premises (a cordite fa ctory) fell against hot pipes. It was alleged that it was necessary to take a bath every day in this w ork to keep in condition. Considered personal business. W here a workm an brought a bottle o f ginger ale as part o f his lunch and in opening it the stopper flew up and hit him in the eye. 72 A D M IN IST R A TIV E PROBLEM S. W here a young man, after eating his lunch on the premises, climbed out on the roof o f the building and, finding him self slipping, grabbed a w ire w ithin his reach. This sagged w ith his weight, and then he grabbed another, thus creating a circuit, and he w as electrocuted. CAMP ACCIDENTS. Owing to the extensive lumbering and mining operations carried on in our Province, we are frequently called upon to deal with claims coming under this heading. I refer especially to such as may happen to a workman after work ing hours. It is well understood, of course, that in most of these operations the men spend the whole of the 24 hours on what may be termed the employer’s premises. Practically the same principle is involved in this type o f case as in the noon-hour accident cases above noted. We allowed the claim o f one man in a river driving camp who after supper went to his tent; while lying on his blanket on the floor reading, another workman came in and accidentally stepped on claimant’s hand, inflicting a wound which became septic, with quite serious results. We considered that the accident, properly speaking, arose out o f the employment. We allowed another claim where a workman in walking from the dining camp to the sleeping camp slipped on the ice and broke his le g ; also another claim where a workman slipped on the steps o f the cook house, where large building operations were going on for an aviation camp. In a border-line case, the claim was allowed where a workman was hired to go to work on a boat next morning. He actually came on board that night and slept on the boat, but was badly hurt next morning before his duties actually began. On the other hand, where a workman w^as injured by slipping on an icy path leading from the works to his own house, which was on employer’s premises, claim was disallowed. It follows, o f course, that workmen injured on the employer’s roads leading from the woods to the camp are considered in the course o f their employment, and in a few cases claims have been al lowed for accidental injuries under such circumstances. The California commission allowed a claim where a workman was injured by falling from a log on the road while coming with others into camp from the woods, but the decision seems to have been put on the ground in that case that these men were allowed time to return to camp from their place o f work. W E D N E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 25— M O R N IN G S E S S IO N . CH AIRM AN, FRED M . W IL C O X , W ISCONSIN. BUSINESS MEETINGREPORT OF THE SECRETARY-TREASURER* A t tlie Columbus meeting o f the International Association o f In dustrial Accident Boards and Commissions, held in April, 1916, I offered to bring out the proceedings of the conference as a bulletin o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics, i f the association so desired. The advantages o f having the, proceedings published and distributed free o f charge by the Bureau o f Labor Statistics were obvious and the offer was accepted by the association. A t the same meeting, I, as United States Commissioner o f Labor Statistics, was chosen secretary-tre^surer o f the International Association o f Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions because of the great advantage of having the publishing and distribution of the proceed ings in the hands o f the secretary and because, by vesting this office in the United States Commissioner o f Labor Statistics, the association secured the benefits not only o f publication free of expense, but of a central national secretariat possessed o f great resources for acquir ing information useful to the accident boards and compensation com missions and o f the right to disseminate such information under the United States Government frank. The reasons for placing the sec retaryship in the Bureau of Labor Statistics seemed to me sound at that time and I think the changing o f conditions has brought out more strongly the indispensableness o f having the office of secretary o f the International Association o f Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions located in Washington and vested with all the rights, powers, and prestige o f a Federal bureau. I accepted the secretaryship o f this association only because o f the great importance o f improving legislation and administration in this comparatively new field o f labor legislation relating to the rights o f workers to compensation for injuries due to industrial hazards. I feel that the association has been very greatly strength ened and benefited by this arrangement, in spite o f the fact that my time has been more than occupied with duties more directly con nected with administering my Bureau, which obliged me to give but scant attention to the affairs o f the association. The International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions has, 73 74 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . however, secured the services of a trained, experienced editorial staff free of expense. It has secured the publication and distribution of its proceedings without cost. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, through its M o n t h l y L a b o r R e v i e w , has put at the disposal of the accident boards and compensation commissions a vast deal of in formation which should be of the greatest practical utility to them. In addition, many hundreds of letters have been written in answer to specific inquiries or to keep the boards and commissions informed of interesting and important matters. All these services rendered to the assocation constitute such additional burdens upon me, my secretary, and the editorial staff in the Bureau of Labor Statistics that some new arrangement must be made for the future. Some criticism was voiced at the Boston meeting because of the lateness in the appearance o f the proceedings o f the Columbus con ference. As I explained at Boston, the papers and transcripts o f the Columbus meeting were not received by me until five months after the meeting was held. When they did reach me they were in such inexcusably bad shape that it required endless correspondence and months o f labor on the part o f the Bureau’s editors to put the proceedings in printable form. By contrast, the proceedings o f the Social Insurance Conference, held in Washington, D. C., December 5 to 9, 1916, which were reported by stenographers of my own staff, were sent to the Government Printing Office January 9, 1917, one month after the close o f the conference, while the proceedings o f the Columbus conference, held in April preceding the 'Social Insur ance Conference, were sent to the Government Printing Office Octo ber 30, 1916, six months after the meeting. The difference in the time between the dates o f meeting and the dates o f sending the bul letins to the printer represents the difference between good reporting and bad reporting. Only one speaker at the Social Insurance Con ference failed to get his remarks to me in time to be included in the proceedings. This delinquent was a noted surgeon. It has been my experience that physicians and surgeons are the most notorious malingerers and procrastinators to be found anywhere. I f they have no better sense o f time value in the practice o f their profes sion than they evidence in meeting their obligations in the matter of writing and correcting their addresses on medical and, surgical sub jects, their unfortunate patients have my profoundest sympathy. No doubt the members of the association marvel that the proceed ings of the Boston meeting have not yet appeared. The reasons for the delay in bringing out the proceedings of the Columbus meet ing apply in the present case, but the circumstances are even more aggravating and are utterly inexcusable. Despite every effort on my part, no papers have ever been received from Dr. J. W. Brick- REPORT OP T H E SECRETARY-TREASU RE R. fey, Dr. Timothy Leary, F. M. W ilcox, and F. J- Donahue, After using up an amount o f time, stenographic skill, typewriter ribbon, paper, and ink all out of-proportion to the value of the results achieved, I did get, on A pril 4, 1918, papers from Dr. F. D. D0110ghue, Dr. J . W. Sever, Dr. E, E. Southard, and Dr. A . W . George. By that time the congestion at the Government Printing Office had become so great that it was utterly hopeless to get anything printed this year except the most urgent war emergency matter. Some o f the speakers did not take enough interest even in their own remarks to give the courtesy o f a reply to my urgent appeals for their papers. It is quite evident that the papers can’t be published unless they are written and sent in. I had almost as great trouble in getting most of the stenographic transcripts of discussions. A fter months of delay, during which time the stenographers apparently completely forgot the meaning o f their notes, if they ever meant anything at all, I received jumbled masses o f more or less meaningless words. The strain upon the patience and nerves of the editors, to say nothing of the time in volved in dealing with such reportorial inefficiency, is awful. In the end, I was obliged to cut out most o f the stenographic reports o f the alleged sayings of speakers. In doing so I felt obliged to sacrifice some good material. I can better picture to you the seriousness o f this matter by an illustration. Those o f you who were present at the luncheon served in the Wefet Lynn plant of the General Electric Co. will remember with pleasure the spontaneous discussion which followed. You will recall that Dr. F. E. Schubmehl started things by condemning the free choice o f physician by the injured workers. Dr. Rubinow at tacked this position and there followed a most animated and highly profitable discussion. The stenographer who took this discussion for some reason credited Dr. Rubinow with only a brief paragraph and Dr. Schubmehl with even less. The remarks o f another speaker who did not contribute anything noteworthy were for some reason reported in extenso. The stenographic report o f this vitally im portant discussion was thus so misleading that I deemed it best to cut out practically all o f it. In many instances the remarks ascribed to speakers were confused or meaningless and had to be eliminated. I make extended refer ence to the unsatisfactory reporting o f discussions not merely to ex plain difficulties and delays in publishing but chiefly to urge the need for adequate reporting if discussions are to be printed at all, I may add that a good deal o f discussion is not worth publishing. Perhaps no further comment on this score is necessary. However, I can not refrain from again saying that the proceedings of the meet- 76 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . mgs can not be brought out promptly and in useful form unless speakers and writers cooperate by sending in papers and corrected manuscripts and proofs promptly to the one charged with the task o f editing and publishing the proceedings. I f the meetings are worth while they are worth reporting correctly and publishing promptly and in usable form. I f they are not worth while, let us discontinue them and dissolve the organization. Regarding this F ifth Annual Meeting of the International Asso ciation o f Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, it was my intention to have all the papers printed and distributed in advance o f the meeting. The overwhelming pressure o f emergency war work, coupled with the setting forward o f the date of the meeting by two weeks, has made it impossible to carry out my intentions fully. It is encouraging that up to September 9, 18 papers out o f the 37 pro vided for on the program had been received by me. It is not so encouraging when we consider that I had asked that papers, to gether with summaries, be submitted not later than August 15. Only 6 of the writers had prepared summaries or synopses of their papers as requested. The 12 papers without summaries had to be gone through carefully and summarized by the editors o f my Bureau. The summaries were mimeographed and sent out on the 9th and 10th o f September. No doubt some of the authors whose papers have been summarized by the editors in the Bureau o f Labor Statistics will feel dissatisfied with the summaries. O f course, it would have been much more satisfactory if the papers could have b ^ n printed in full before the meeting. A summary by the author is the next best thing when the complete paper is not available. One reason for asking the authors o f papers to submit summaries was to en able us to take care o f the papers by mimeographing the summaries in case it should prove impossible for any reason to get the complete papers printed in advance. Coming now to a question o f even more immediate moment, I do not see how the Bureau o f Labor Statistics can publish the proceed ings o f this present meeting. The appropriation for printing and binding allotted to the Bureau has been cut from $76,000 to $35,000— a sum which is inadequate to pay for the printing of the M o n t h l y L a b o r R e v i e w alone for a year. Even if my printing funds were made sufficient and the papers and stenographic reports came in promptly and in perfect shape for printing, it would still be very difficult to manage the publication because of the overwhelming pressure of work falling upon my Bureau and the congestion in the Government Printing Office. It has been proposed in Congress that all “ nonessential” printing be eliminated. We are all heartily in favor of that plan, but our classification o f nonessential printing REPORT OF T H E SECRETARY-TREASU RER. 77 would probably not coincide with that of Congress. In view o f these facts it seems necessary that the association consider seriously whether it is not possible to make some other arrangements for pub lication o f the complete proceedings. A summarization o f the pro ceedings will, of course, appear in the November number o f the M o n t h l y L a b o r E e v i e w . . I f it shall be found impossible to provide for the publication of the proceedings more surely and more speedily than appears possible through the Bureau o f Labor Statistics, I shall o f course use every effort to get them out. The situation is so un certain, however, that I desire to call the attention of the delegates to the probable delay and even the possibility that the Bureau o f Labor Statistics can get nothing published for the association. I wish it distinctly understood that the Bureau o f Labor Statistics will continue to send out useful information to all accident boards and compensation commissions throughout the United States and Canada, both through the columns o f the M o n t h l y L a b o r E e v i e w and by letter. To make my Bureau as useful as possible to the members o f this association and to labor officials generally, the boards and com missions must inform the Bureau o f Labor Statistics promptly o f any interesting and important developments in compensation legislation and administration. The treasurer’s report on the finances of the International Asso ciation of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions shows that it is not y£t a solvent organization, although the membership dues were doubled last year and the active paying memberships have in creased from 24 to 28—more than 16 per cent. The 28 active paying members are: The Industrial Accident Commission of California. The Workmen’s Compensation Commission of Connecticut. The Industrial Accident Boards o f Hawaii (counties o f Kauai, Maui, Hawaii, and Honolulu). The Workmen’s Compensation Service of Iowa. The Industrial Commission of Illinois. The Industrial Accident Commission of Maryland. Industrial Accident Board of Massachusetts. State Board of Labor and Industries of Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board o f Michigan. Department of Labor and Industries of Minnesota. Industrial Accident Board o f Montana. Department o f Labor of New Jersey. New York State Industrial Commission.Industrial Commission of Ohio. Industrial Commission of Oklahoma. Industrial Accident Commission of Oregon. 78 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . Department o f Labor and Industiy o f Pennsylvania. Industrial Accident Board o f Texas. Industrial Commission o f Utah. Industrial Insurance Department of Washington. State Compensation Commissioner of West Virginia. Industrial Commission o f Wisconsin. Workmen’s Compensation Department o f Wyoming. Workmen’s Compensation Board of British Columbia. Workmen’s Compensation Board of Manitoba. Workmen’s Compensation Board o f Nova Scotia. Workmen’s Compensation Board o f Ontario. Department of Public Works and Labor of Quebec. The dues o f the 11 following active paying members, however, have not yet been received for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919: The Industrial Commission o f Illinois. State Board o f Labor and Industries of Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board of Michigan. Department of Labor and Industries o f Minnesota. Industrial Accident Board of Montana. New York State Industrial Commission. Industrial Commission of Oklahoma. Industrial Accident Board o f Texas. State Compensation Commissioner of West Virginia. Workmen’s Compensation Board of British Columbia. Workmen’s Compensation Board of Ontario. You will recall that the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Department o f Labor o f Canada, while entitled to vote as active members, are exempt from the payment of dues. It will be noted that two Massachusetts boards belong to the associ ation, namely, the State Industrial Accident Board and the State Board of Labor and Industries. Both these agencies are, of course, interested in the purposes of our organization. This adds point to my suggestion for the amalgamation of the International Associ ation of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions and the Associ ation of Governmental Labor Officials of the United States and Canada. We also have four associate members paying $10 each. members are: These Mr. William P. White, treasurer and general manager of the Lowell Paper Tube Corporation, Lowell, Mass. National Workmen’s Compensation Service Bureau, Newr York, N. Y. Mr. John T. Clarkson, general counsel, law department, United Mine Workers, District No. 13, Albia, Iowa. Workmen’s Relief Commission o f Porto Rico. REPORT OF T H E SECRE TA R Y -T R E A SU R E R . 79 The last-named associate member has just joined the organization and the annual dues have not yet been received. It is very difficult to obtain the appropriations from State legis latures to pay the dues. The difficulty is greatly increased by the fact that another organization exists, claiming jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to labor, including the administration o f com pensation laws. I refer, o f course, to the Association o f Govern mental Labor Officials o f the United States and Canada. A State legislature would be justified in thinking that there is no good rea son for the separate existence o f these two organizations. The election o f the chairman o f the Industrial Commission o f Wisconsin as the president o f the Association o f Governmental Labor Officials o f the United States and Canada marks a new epoch in the history o f that association and gives promise that the association will be come, as it should be, a most useful organization for the standardiza tion and improvement o f labor administration and labor legislation. Because the Association o f Governmental Labor Officials gives evi dence o f better things and because the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions has become pretty firmly established, it seems to me the time is ripe for an amalgama tion o f these two organizations. In Wisconsin, Ohio, and New York the industrial commissions are charged with the administra tion o f all labor laws, including workmen’s compensation laws. In all States it is vital to bring the administrators of the compensation laws and the people generally to see the connection between prevent ing injuries and paying compensation for them. The amalgamation should make it easier to get the State legislatures to make appropria tions for the support o f the amalgamated organization; it would cut dowTn travel and other expenses and eliminate much loss o f time and bother by substituting one meeting for two ; it would unify more closely the labor-enforcing agencies in those States not having in dustrial commissions. The only possible disadvantage that I can see is that the more backward States might gain control o f the organization. Presumably the compensation States are more pro gressive than the noncompensation States. Some may argue that amalgamation should not be considered until all States have com pensation laws. There are 38 States, two Territories, and seven Provinces o f Canada with compensation laws, as against 10 States, the District o f Columbia, and four Provinces o f Canada without compensation laws. The argument then has little weight. It would be necessary, o f course, to have separate sessions devoted to the discussion of special compensation problems, including statis tics o f accidents for compensation purposes, medical, surgical, and 80 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . hospital treatment, the retraining o f injured workers and their re employment in suitable occupations, as well as the problems con cerned with the hearing o f compensation cases and the granting and handling o f compensation awards. After the rather frank manner in which I have discussed the delinquencies o f conference speakers, coupled with my statement re garding the printing fund of the Bureau o f Labor Statistics, it is perhaps superfluous for me to announce that I am not a candidate for reelection as secretary-treasurer. I have been obliged to let many things go undone which should have been attended to in the interests o f the association and its several members, because o f many other duties which could not be neglected or postponed. I f the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions and the Association o f Governmental Labor Officials of the United States and Canada are amalgamated, as I have suggested, a secretary-treasurer is needed who can give not less than half his time to the affairs o f the amalgamated association. It does not seem possible that the association will be immediately able t'o maintain a paid secretary with the necessary office force and pay for the publica tion of its proceedings as well. The proceedings o f the Columbus meeting (Bulletin 210), consisting of 252 pages, cost the Bureau of Labor Statistics a little over $1,700. This charge covered only the cost o f composition and paper and did not pay for the large amount of editorial and clerical work required to bring out the bulletin. The same bulletin would now cost at least 20 per cent more, be cause o f the increase in prices and wages. The association should face the situation and now decide whether steps should be taken to establish a central office, financed by funds to be collected from mem bers, or whether it will continue to depend upon the rather inadequate services and dilatory and uncertain publication facilities offered by the Bureau o f Labor Statistics. I submit an estimated budget for your consideration in case you should decide that the former course is advisable. B udget fo r Amalgamated Association. F or secretary to association, including stenographic and clerical w ork— $2, 500 S ta tio n e r y _________________________________________________________________ 75 F or p osta g e_______________________________________________________________ 250 50 F or telegram s------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------Printing ,o f program s fo r annual meeting-----------------------------------------------50 Miscellaneous expenses connected with annual meeting________________ 100 F or reporting proceed in g s________________________________________________ 400 F or printing proceedings___________________________________________________ 3, 000 6, 425 REPORT OF T H E SECRETARY-TREASU RER. 81 FIN A N C IA L STATEM EN T. B E C E IP T S . 1917. Aug, 21. Balance on hand, including postage and telegraph fund o f $3.48_________________________________________________________ $371. 09 21. For membership dues, 1917-18, Compensation B oard o f M anitoba____________________________________________________ 50.00 21. From sales at Boston meeting o f the report o f discussion be fore the British R oyal Society o f M edicine on toxic jaundice observed in munition w orkers____________________ 11.00 21. From John T. Clarkson, legal department, United Mine W orkers o f Am erica, D istrict 13, Albia, Iow a, associate membership dues, 1917-18___________________________________ 10.00 Sept. 29. From W illiam P. W hite, o f the L ow ell Paper Tube Corpora tion, associate membership dues, 1917-18__________________ 10.00 Oct. 4. From New Y ork State Industrial Commission for five copies o f the report o f the discussion before the B ritish Royal Society o f M edicine on toxic jaundice observed in muni tion w orkers________________________________________________ 5. 00 6. From Mr. Albert W . W hitney, fo r associate membership dues, 1917-18, o f the National W orkm en’s Compensation Service Bureau______________________________________________________ 10.00 6. Membership dues for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919— W orkm en’s Compensation Board o f Connecticut___________ 50.00 Nov. 15. From the Illinois Department o f Labor for three copies o f the report o f the discussion before the British Royal So ciety o f Medicine on toxic jaundice observed in munition w orkers_____________________________________________________ 3.0 0 1918. Jan. 1. Interest on bank deposit______________________________________ 3.60 Membership dues for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919: Apr. 16. Massachusetts Industrial Accident B oard____________________ 50.00 17. Maryland Industrial Accident Commission___________________ 50. 00 23. Department o f Public W orks and Labor, Province o f Quebec50.00 May 15. Washington Industrial Insurance Department_______________ 50. 00 25. W orkm en’s Compensation Departm ent o f W yom ing__________ 50. 00 June 17. W orkm en’s Compensation Service o f Iow a_________________ 50. 00 24. W orkm en’s Compensation Boards o f H aw aii (counties o f K auai, Maui, H awaii, and H on olu lu )______________________ 50.00 July 1. Interest on bank deposits_____________________________________ 3. 92 Membership dues fo r .the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919: 8. Compensation Board o f M anitoba_____________________________ 50. 00 26. W orkm en’s Compensation Board o f Nova Scotia_____________ 50. 00 Aug. 3. Industrial Commission o f Utah______________________________ 50. 00 50.00 17. W isconsin Industrial Commission_____________________________ 21. Industrial Commission o f Ohio_______________________________ 50.00 28. C alifornia Industrial Accident Commission___________________ 50. 00 28. Oregon Industrial Accident Com mission______________________ 50. 00 29. Pennsylvania Department o f L abor___________________________ 50.00 T o t a l_____________________________________________________________ 1,277.61 124247°— 19-------6 B U S IN E S S M E E T I N G . 82 D IS B U R S E M E N T S , 1917. Aug. 21. Postage and telegraph fund (balance on h a n d )_______ ___ ___ $3.48 27. To Bay State R ailw ay Co. (special car to Lynn, Mass., to see General Electric Co. plant) check to Dudley M. H olm an___ 16.40 29. T o Dr. Cora B. Gross, for services as registrar, fourth annual meeting, B oston _____________________________________ 12.00 29. T o D udley M. Holman, conference expenses: Postage, $2.75; signs and messenger, $ 2 ; typewriting, $2.25; messengers, 75 ce n ts; telephone calls, $ 1 J 0 ; telegrams, $1.56; luncheon and suppers, B oy Scouts, $3.50_____________________________ 14.31 29. Reporting meeting, August 21________________________________ 20. 00 Sept. 7. T o Robert M iller & Co. (h iring o f flags and draping &ame, fourth annual meeting, B o s to n )____________________________ 5.00 26. To Charles G. Stott (In c .), 10,000 sheets o f -mimeographed 14.40 p a p e r ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dec. 12. F or transcripts o f stenographic reports, fourth annual meet ing, B o s to n __________________________________________________ 35. 50 12 F or transcript o f stenographic report, fourth annual meet ing, B o s to n __________________________________________________ 3. 50 12. F or transcript o f stenographic report, fourth annual meet ing, B o s to n __________________________________________________ -3.85 1918. Jan. 7. T o Gibson Bros. (I n c .), for letterheads, envelopes, second sheets ( alterations in letterheads)__________________________ 30.00 Mar. 11. F or transcripts o f stenographic reports, fourth annual meet ing, B o s to n __________________________________________________ 27.32 18. F or postage and telegraph fund______________________ _______ 5. 00 23. For postage and telegraph fund______________________________ 10. 00 Aug. 24. F or postage and telegraph fu nd_____________________________ 10. 00 Sept. 16. F or printing programs, and alterations_____________________ 20. 50 17. Cash on hand---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1, 046. 35 T o t a l ____________________________________________ - ________________ 1, 277. 61 There is a postage fu n d balance amounting to $9.84. When the accounts o f the International Association o f industrial Accident Boards and Commissions w ere first turned over to me as seeretary-treasurer &f the organization there w as some confusion net on ly as to the membership o f the organization but also as to when the dues should be paid. Last M arch it was found, after much inquiry, that o f all the boards am i commissions be longing to the association only six had paid any dues since January, 1917, tiie m ajority o f these being new members. It % was, therefore, thought both inad visable and im practicable to attempt to collect 4ues fo r 1917-18, when the new constitution provided that the dues for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919, should be paid between July 1, 1918, a-nd the annual meeting this fall. Such attempt would have meant that every delinquent industrial a<?eident board and commission would have had to be requested to pay dues fo r tw o years be tween last April and the annual meeting this fail. Moreover, the amount o f •dues was increased by the new constitution from $25 to $50 and, previous to the adoption o f the constitution, there was nothing to mdieate when the fiscal year o f the association began. In view o f these conditions and also o f the fact that there were enough funds in the treasury to carry the organization up to REPORT OF T H E ;SEC&ETAliY-TREASURER. m Jane SO, 1918, it wsls decided that a ll dales paid after the last annual meeting should be credited to the fiscal year ending June 39, 1919. It w ill be noted that the Province o f Manitoba paid dues on August 21, 1917, fo r the fiscal year 1917-18, and on July 8, 1918, for the fiscal year ending June %30, £919. A s the <;oiai$>ensatiou aboard o f M anitoba is the only active member that lias paid dues twice since the opening o f the last annual meeting (Aug. 21, 1917), it is recommended that duses paid by such board on Ju ly 8, 1918, be credited to fe e fiscal year e&ding June SO, 1920. Vouchers fo r annual dues have been received from both the New Y ork State Industrial Com mission an d the New Jersey Departm ent o f Labor, but payment has not yet been made. It is highly desirable that dues fee paid at least a month in advance o f the annual meeting, so that a complete statement o f the financial condition o f the ' association may be em bodied in the treasurer’s annual report too such meeting. O t the §0 c e p e s o f the report o f the discussion before the British iioy a l S ociety o f Medicine on to x ic jaundice observed in munition workers, w hich w ere purchased in June, 1917, 26 have been sold. Respectfully submitted. R o y a l M eeker, S cc retury- T r e m u r e r . REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. The committee on jurisdictional conflicts re|>orted progress and was continued. The committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost sub mitted its report which was adopted. The executive committee was authorized to cooperate with the Federal Bureau of Standards in tha formulation of a uniform safety code; also to study the question of uniformity in State compensation laws. Following is the full re port of the committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost: fEPOKT OFCOMMITTEE ONSTATISTICS AND COMPENSATION INSURANCE COST. A t the annual meeting o f th is association a t Columbus in April, 1916, your com m ittee subm itted standard classifications o f industries and accident causes and o f industrial injuries by location and nature o f injury and extent o f dis ability. T h e com m ittee’s recommendations on these subjects w ere adopted by the association and are gradually being put into use by the various State boards and commissions. It is believed that a foundation has thus been laid for uniform statistics o f industrial accidents. T his report o f the committee has been printed in fu ll in Bulletin 201 o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Sta tistics. A t the last annual meeting o f the association at Boston, in August, 1917, your * committee submitted standard definitions for industrial accident uses, a stand ard scale o f weights designed to express the severity o f accidents in terms o f days lost, and standard tables for the presentation o f accident and compensa tion statistics. This report was also adopted by the association and was printed in the October, 1917, issue o f the M o n t h l y R e vie w o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics. During the past year your committee, continuing its work, has held two meetings, these meetings occupying some 10 sessions covering four days. The 84 B U SIN E SS M E E T IN G . revision o f the classification o f accident causes has been the com m ittee’s ch ief w ork during these meetings. D uring the two years since the original cause classification was published by the committee it has been in use by all the members o f the committee and by others. Naturally, this practical experience had given rise to suggestions for changes and additions to the classifications. Furthermore, experience had shown the need o f some agreed-upon rules o f practice, in order that variations in interpretation o f the causes might not develop so as to render results not fairly comparable and, therefore, seriously im pair their usefulness. The committee believes that this experience has en abled it to im prove greatly the cause classification, and it submits this classifi cation as now revised, w ith its accompanying notes, with confidence that it represents a m arked improvement on any cause classification hitherto published. The committee in its meetings during the year has also made some minor revision o f the classifications o f accident by location and nature o f injury and extent o f disability. The revision o f these classifications has, however, been in minor details, not in any way affecting the broad outline as published in Bulletin 201. The committee has given some consideration to a revision o f the industry classification, but any extended revision o f this classification is so form idable a task that the committee has, thus far, made only slight progress in that work. The revision o f this classification has been attempted by an inform al committee, made up o f several members o f your committee and representatives o f the National W orkm en’s Compensation Service Bureau and others. T h is inform al committee has held several meetings and has practically completed a revision o f the industry classification, w hich it is expected w ill be subm itted at a later date, for the consideration o f the com m ittee on statistics. It has been the plan o f your committee that this w ork should be taken up at its next meeting. A t the last meeting o f the committee it discussed w ith F rederick L. H offm an, chairm an o f the committee on statistics o f the National Safety Council, the question o f the standardizing o f the methods used by individual establishments fo r recording, classifying, and analyzing accidents to employees. It was agreed that some standard form s and methods should be w orked out, i f practicable, so that results may be properly tabulated and comparisons, statistically valid, may be made. It w as agreed w ith Mr. Hoffman that the whole m atter should be the subject o f conference w ith his committee at a future meeting. It is understood that Dr. H offm an’s committee is recommending for adoption by the National Safety Council the definitions and classifications o f your committee. As recommended in the report submitted last year, it is believed that the w ork o f this committee should be continuous. Experience in the several States is constantly disclosing the need o f interchange o f views and experience and o f the discussions which are only possible in meetings o f such a committee. Progress in the standardization o f accident and compensation statistics w ill be necessarily somewhat slow, but the need, which was evident when the com mittee was organized, that statistical methods be standardized to facilitate comparisons and to aid the boards and commissions in adm inistrative w ork becomes more and more pressing with the extension o f workm en’s compensa tion laws. The revised classifications which the committee recommends fo r adoption follow . REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. C L A S S IF IC A T IO N OF A C C ID E N T 85. CAU SES. GENERAL CAUSE CLASSIFICATION. I. 32. m . IV. V. VI. VII. V m . IX . X. XI. Machinery. Vehicles (not including construction of), Explosions, electricity, fires, and hot substances. Poisonous and corrosive substances and occupational diseases. Falls of persons. Stepping on or striking against objects. Falling objects— not being handled by injured, Handling of objects. Hand tools. Animals. Miscellaneous causes. I. M A C H IN E R Y . A . Prim e M overs. 1. Steam engines. 2. Gas or gasoline engines. N o te . — Include all internal-combustion engines. 3. Electric motors and dynamos. 4. Compressed-air motors. 5. W ater motors. 6. Other prime movers. B. Pow er-Transm ission Apparatus. 1. Shafts. 2. Shaft collars and couplings. 3. Set screws, keys, and- bolts. 4. Belts and pulleys. 5. Chains and sprockets. 6. Ropes, cables, and drums. 7. Cogs, cams, gears, and friction wheels. N o te . — Accidents upon belts, pulleys, shafts, gears, or other driving mechanism or parts thereof w hich form the connection between a ma chine and the prime mover or intermediate drive shall be charged to transmission apparatus. This includes parts attached to the machine. Accidents upon belts, pulleys, shafts, gears, or other driving mechanism, or parts thereof which connect one part o f the machine w ith another part o f the same machine, shall be charged to the machine. C. Pow er-W orking M achinery. N o te . — The committee believes that power-working machines should be classified by industry, and that within each industry group the principal types o f working machines should be grouped by operative hazard. The committee recommends the use o f the list o f working machines prepared by the Bureau o f Statistics and Inform ation o f the New Y ork Industrial Commission, in cooperation w ith the National W orkm en’s Service Bureau. B U S I N E S S M E E T IN G * m The list follow s: Power-working machines. S t o n e , C l a y , a n d G l a s s P roducts M a c h i n e s . 030 Brick-m aking m achinery (not. otherwise classified). 031 . B rick cut-off machines. 032 D ry pans. 033 M olding machines. 034 Pug mills. 040 Cement-making machinery ( s o l otherw ise classified). Bag-filling machines (cross index, Barreling, etc., machines, under > . F o o d ).-. 042 Cement-block machines. 043 Tube mills. 050 Glass-making m achinery (n ot otherwise classified). 051 Polishing wheels. 052 Presses. 053 Surface grinding machines. 060 Pottery-m aking machinery. 080 Stone crushers. 090 Stone-working machinery other than crushers (not otherw ise classified). 091 Drills. Planers (cross index, M etal). 093 Saws. 094 Rubbing beds. M e t a l - W o r k in g M a c h i n e s . 100 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 115 319 120 121 122 123 124 125 129 130 132 133 134 135 136 139 All other metal-working machines. Abrasive wheels (emery, etc.). Bending and straightening machines (revolving rolls, screw or clam p). Corrugating rolls. Crimping rolls. Other metal rolls. Other bending and straightening machines (n ot r olls). B olt and nut, pipe-cutting, threading, and tapping machines. Boring machines or mills (horizontal and vertical) (n ot otherwise clas sified. D rills (drill presses), radial and upright or gooseneck. Milling and gear-cutting machines (n ot otherwise classified). Broaching machines. Die sinkers. Gear-cutting machines. K ey seaters. M illing machines. Profilers. Slotters. Other or indefinite. Hammers and forging machines (n ot otherwise classified). Belt machines. Drop hammers. Forging hammers. , Scrap breakers. Swaging machines. Upsetting machines (not otherwise classified). Other or indefinite. REPORT OF C O M M IT T E E OS' ST A T IST IC S. Lathes and automatic screw machines. Lathes (not otherwise classified). Screw machines. Turret lathes. Cleaning mills—tumblers or rumble Molding machines (core, sand mixers, tamping, etc.) (not otherwise classified). Planers and shapers. 151 Planers. 152. Shapers. i5'5 Polishers and buffers. 156 Portable power tools (pneumatic and electric drills, hammers and riveters). Presses (power) (including punches). 157 Arbor presses. 158 Bulldozers. 159 Button presses. 160 Draw presses. 161 Embossing presses. 362 Punch, stamping, and trimming presses. 163 Punch and eyeletting machines. 164 Punches and riveting presses (not riveting hammers). 167 Other or indefinite. 368Presses (foot and hand operated—no mechanical power) (not otherwise classified). 169 Button presses. 170 Rolling mills (including blooming mills). 171 Saws (not otherwise classified). 172 Band. 173 Circular. 174 Hack. 175 Scroll and jig. 176 Shears (not otherwise classified). 185 Welding and heat cutting machines. 186 Wire working machines (not otherwise classified). 190 Winding machines (armatures, etc.). 191 Cable-making machines (not otherwise classified). 195 Wire and tube drawing machines. 197 Presses—hydraulic, pneumatic, and screw. 140 141 142 145 146 W o od w o rkin g M a c h i n e s . 200All other woodworking machines (not otherwise classified). 205 Bending machines. 206 Boring machines and drills. 207 Cork working machines (not otherwise classified). 208 Band knife. 209 Cork board cutters, block cutters, etc. 210 Cork-slicing machines. 213 Lathes (not otherwise classified). 214 Spoke lathes. 215 Shoe last machines. 216 Button lathes (ivory, etc.). 88 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . 220 223 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 234 237 238 239 240 241 242 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 265 266 267 268 270 272 280 Mortising machines (not otherwise classified). Chain mortisers. Chisel mortisers. Pocket and boring machines. Tenoning, planing and molding machines (not otherwise classified). Auto, blind slat (tenoner). Edgers. Jointers. Matchers. Molders. Planers. Stickers. Tenoning machines. Presses (not otherwise classified). Clamping machines. Box nailers. Box board squeezers. Door and blind clamps. Hoop presses. Sanding machines (not otherwise classified). Belt (felloe and panel). Disk. Spindle and post. Surface or drum. Saws (band, scroll, or jig) (not otherwise classified). Band. Band resaw. Jig or scroll. Saws (circular and all other) (not otherwise classified). Circular. Gaining machine. Gang circular. Lath bolter. Swing. Dado. Dovetailing. Rabbetting. Shapers (including special head cutters) (not otherwise classified). Core box machines. Shapers. Variety machines. Veneering machine (all kinds) (not otherwise classified). Veneer machines. Brush and broom-making machines (all kinds). 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 All other. Buffing drums. Other drums and paddle vats. Fur-working machines. Fleshing, shaving, and skiving machines. Jacks— felting, glassing, rolling, etc. Presses and baling machines. Hair washing and drying machines. 221 222 L e a t h e r - W o r k in g M a c h in e s — T a n n e r ie s . REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. 308 309 310 311 Setting up (or setting out) machines. Splitting machines. Unhairing machines. Extractors (centrifugal). L e a t h e r -W o r k in g M a c h in e s — L e a t h e r P roducts . 320 A ll other. 330Cutting machines (not otherwise classified). 340Punching and pressing machines (not otherwise classified). 350 Sewing machines. 351 Buffing and scouring machines. 352 All other shoe-making machines. P a per -M a k i n g M a c h i n e s . 360 All other. 305Barkers, chippers, splitters, and grinders, indefinite. 366 Barkers. 367 Chippers. 368 Grinders. 369 Splitters. 370 Beaters (including rag washers). 371 Screens. Paper machines. 372 Other or indefinite. 373 Head box. 374 Apron. 375 Wire. 376 Suction roll. 377 Couch roll. 378 Dryers. 379 Calenders. 380 Doctors. 381 Bolls and winders. 382 Cutters and slitters. 383 Choppers. 384 Digestors. P aper -P roducts M a c h i n e s . 386 All other (not otherwise classified). 3S7 Paper-cup machines. 388 Tube machines. 389 Twine-making machines. 390 Automatic box-making machines. 391 Covering machines. 392 Cutting and punching machines (not otherwise classified). 393 Die cutters. 394 Guillotines. 395 Paper cutters (hand). 396 Perforators. 397 Punches. 398 Rotary cutters. 399 Saws. 400 Shears. 90 B U SIN E SS M E E T IN G . 401 Doming and ending machines (not otherwise classified). Doming machines. 402 Corrugating machines (not rolls). 408 * Ending machines. 404 406 Corner staying machines. Bag and envelope making machines. 407 Paper finishing machines. 408 Embossing rolls or calendars (cross index, Itubber). Embossing presses (cross index, Metal). P r in t in g a n d B o o k b in d in g M a c h in e s . 420 Composing machines (type casting and trimining machines) (not otherwise 421 422 423 424 426 427 428 429 430 431 440 441 442 445 450 classified). Linotypes. Monotypes. Type casters. Gathering machines. Presses (printing) (not otherwise classified). Web newspaper presses. Flat-bed cylinder presses. Job platen presses. Other printing presses. Presses (binders) (not otherwise classified). Sewing and stitching machines (not otherwis# classified). Wire stitchers. Wire staplers. Other printing machines. Other bookbinding machines. T e x t il e M a c h i n e s . 460 461 462 469 470 471 472 473 475 476 477 478 479 485 486 487 489 490 491 492 493 All other (not otherwise classified). Washers. Driers. Opening and cleaning machines (not otherwise classified). Openers. Pickers. Rag pickers. Willow. Carding and combing machines (not otherwise classified). Cards. Combs. Garnett machines. Slubbers. Spinning machines (not otherwise classified). Jacks and mules. Spinning frames. Drawing frames. Weaving machines (not otherwise classified). Looms. Wire-cloth looms. Warpers. REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E O K ST ATISTICS. M Dyeing, finishing, and printing machines (not otherwise classified). 501 Pile-cutting machines. 502 Shearing machines. 510 Braiding and knitting machines. 515 Rope-making machines. 520 530 540 545 Sewing machines (cross index, Leather products). Cloth cutting and stamping machines (not otherwise classified). Hat-making machines. Coating and inlaying machines (linoleum, etc.; other coated fabrics). Winders, doublers, and quitters. L au n d r y M a c h in e s . 550 All other. Extractors (cross index, Leather). 560 Ironing machines (not otherwise classified)# 561 Body ironers. 562 Flat work ironers. 563 Mangles. 570 Washing machines (rotary). F ood P roducts M a c h i n e s . All other. Cleaning, preparing, and sorting machines (not otherwise classified). Milling and grinding machines (not otherwise classified). Mixing machines and mixing kettles (dough and chocolate miners, etc.). Bough mixers. Cookers (not mixers) and ovens (not otherwise classified). Shaping and forming machines (not otherwise classified). Cutting machines (not otherwise classified). Coating and polishing pans (not otherwise classified). Calenders (candy rolls, etc.) (not otherwise classified). Crushers (ice crushers, etc.) Barreling, bagging, packing, and wrapping machines (automatic or semi automatic). 640 Bottling machines. 645 Tobacco working "machines. Stamping presses— power-operated (cross index* Metal). Stamping presses—foot or hand-operated (cross index, Metal). 655 Bleaching and blanching machines. 660 Containers* washing and cleaning machines. 580 585 595 605 60S 610 615 620 625 630 635 636 F arm 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 All other. Feed and ensilage cutting and shredding machines. Harvesters. Thrashers. Hay presses and balers. Shelling machines. Cream separators. Cotton gins. E n g in e er in g 680 681 M a c h in e s . All other. Concrete mixers. Rock drills. and C on tractin g M a c h in e s . 92 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . 683 684 685 686 687 Pile drivers. Road rollers. Grouting machines and cement guns. Well drills. Trench and ditch digging machines. C h e m ic a l P ro d u c ts M a c h in e s — A cid s an d S alts . 690 691 692 693 All other. Grinding machines (except abrasive wheels). Agitating mixers, vats, and kettles (except paint and pony mixers). Machinery of recovery, such as screens, sifters, filters, and extractors, not centrifugal. 694 Furnaces, ovens, dryers, and evaporators, mechanically fed or operated. Crushers (cross index, Stone crushers). Calenders (cross index, Rubber). Centrifugal extractors (cross index, Leather, tanneries). C h e m i c a l -P roducts M a c h i n e s — S o aps , G r e a se s , O il s , a n d F e r tiliz er s . 700 All other. Agitating mixers, vats, and kettles (except paint and pony mixers) (cross index, Acids). Soap-stamping presses—power-operated (cross index, Power presses, under Metal). Soap-stamping presses— hand and foot operated (cross index, Foot presses, under Metal). Soap grinders (cross index, Grinding machines, under Acids). Barreling, bagging, packing, and wrapping machines— automatic or semi automatic (cross index, Food products). Machinery of recovery, such as screens, sifters, filters, and extractors, not centrifugal (cross index, Acids). 705 All other. Grinding machines (cross index, Acids). Mixers (except pony mixers) (cross index, Acids). Tablet presses and pill machines (cross index, Shaping machines, under Foot). Pony mixers (cross index, Paint mixers). C h e m i c a l -P roducts M a c h i n e s — D r ug s . P a i n t s , V a r n i s h e s , D r y C olors , I n k s , a n d D y e s . 710 All other. Agitating vats and kettles (except paint or pony mixers) (cross index, Acids). 715 Pony or paint mixers. Grinding machines (cross index, Acids). Machinery of recovery, such as screens, sifters, filters, and extractors, not centrifugal (cross index, Acids). Furnaces and ovens, mechanically fed or operated (cross index, Acids). Crushers (cross index, Stone crushers). Calenders (cross index, Rubber). Centrifugal extractors (cross index, Leather, tanneries). REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. 93 R ubber , C ellu lo id , C o m p o s it io n , P ear l , B o n e , a n d T ortoise S h e l l . 720 725 726 727 728 All others. Calenders. Tire and tube making machines* Hose-making machines. Rubber-band choppers and cutters. Mixers, not of calender type (cross index, Pony mixers— paint). Cutting and slitting machines (cross index, Paper making). 729 Tubing and hose-wrapping machines. 730 Tire-wrapping machines. Tumblers (cross index, Cleaning mills, under M etal). 731 732 733 734 Presses—foot and hand operated (cross index, Metal). Tubing machines. Punching and pressing machines (press and dye type) (cross index, Leather products). Cutting and punching machines (guillotine type) (cross index, Paper products). Comb-cutting machines and ornament shapers. Drills (button, etc.). Grinding, washing, milling, and cracking machines. M i n i n g a n d O re -R e f in in g M a c h i n e s . 735 744 Sackett machine (gypsum products). All other. 745 748 Office machinery. All othei\ M is c e l l a n e o u s . D. Machines Other than Working Machines. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Pumps. Fans and blowers. Turntables. Compressors. Automatic stokers. All other. E. Hoisting apparatus, 1. Elevators controlled (not construction elevators). (a) Cable, breaking. (&) Cable, unwinding. (c) Cable, overwinding (car rising too high). (tf) Cable, caught by. ( e ) Counterweight, struck by. (/) Machinery, breaking. (g) Machinery, caught in. ( h) Car, caught between floor and. (i) Car, caught between shaft side and. (j) Car, caught between gate and. ( k) Car, struck by, in pit. (I) Caught between car and overhead equipment or top of shaft. (m) Car, struck by, elsewhere. (n) Car, sadden start or stop. (o) Car, dumping. {B U S IN E S S H aiM ing A p p a r a tu s —^Continued. 1. Elevators controlled (not construction elevators)— Concluded. ( p) Car rising too high. (q) Fall of person into shaft, from floor. (r) Fall of person into shaft, from rear. ( s) Fall of person into car, from floor. ( t ) Objects falling down shaft, from floor. (m) ‘Objects Jailing down shaft, from car. (v) Objects falling from floor into -car. (w) Catching of load or part;thereof between caiNaad-shaft, (%) Gates, not otherwise classified. (y) All other. 2. Elevators, automatic, and .dumb waiters. 3. Elevators, sidewalk. 4. Construction hoists .and^elevators (mot .derricks;). ( a) Cable, breaking. .(&) Gable, unwinding. (c) Cable, overwinding (car rising too high). ( d) Cable, caught .by. (e) Counterweight, struck by. ( /) Machinery, breaking. ( g) Machinery, caught in. (7i) Car, caught between floor and. ( i) Car, caught between shaft side and. O') Car, caught between gate and. ( k) Car, struck by, in pit. (I) Caught between car and overhead equipment or top of;Shaft. (m) Car, struck by, elsewhere. ( n) Car, sudden start or stop. (o) Car, dumping. (p) Car rising too high. ( q) Fall of person into shaft, from floor. (r) Fall of person into shaft, from car. (s) Fall of person into car, from floor. ( t ) Objects falling down shaft from floor. (u) Objects falling down shaft from car. (v) Objects falling from floor into car. (tv) Catching of load or part thereof between car and shaft. (x) Gates, not otherwise classified. (y) All other. 5. Mine cages, skips, and buckets. N ote .— I n those cases w here m ines are im portant, sp ecial an a lysis o f m ine-cage accidents should be made. 6. Cranes, locomotive. (a) Car, striking person. (b) Car, falling. (c) Cable or chain, catching or striking person. (d) Machinery, catching .person. 1 (e) Hook or sling, catching or striking person. (f) Load, struck by, swinging. (g) Load, struck by, lowering or raising. (h) Load falling, broken cable. (i ) Load falling, slipping cable. (/) Load falling, breaking of hook. REPORT OP COMMITS!KK ON ST ATISTICS. t5 E. H oisting Apparatus— Concluded. 6. Cranes, locom otive— Concluded. ( k ) Load falling, slipping o f liook. (I) Load falling, sling breaking. (m ) Load falling, machinery breaking. ( n ) Load falling, hitch slipping. (0 ) Load falling, failure o f current ^©n magnet. (p ) O bjects falling from load. (q ) Falls from crane or crane track (n ot in greetin g #r rig g in g ). ( r ) Other. 7. Cranes, other traveling. (a ) Car, striking person. (&) Car, falling. (c ) Cable or chain, catching or striking persan. ( d ) M achinery, catching person. (e ) H ook or sling, catching or striking person. ( f ) Load, struck by, swinging. (g ) Load, struck by, low ering or raising. (h ) Load falling, broken cable. (£) Load falling, slipping cable. ( j ) Load falling, breaking o f hook. (7c) Load falling, slipping <®f ik©@k. (1) Load falling, sling breaking. (m ) Load falling, m achinery breaking. (ft) Load falling, hitch slipping. (0 ) Load fallin g, failure o f etrrTent on magnet. ( p ).. Objects fallin g from load. (q ) Falls from crane or crane track (n ot in erecting er digging), (r ) Other. 8. Derricks and jib cranes. (а ) D errick or crane, striking person. (б ) D errick or crane, falling. (c ) Cable or chain, catching person. ( d ) M achinery, catching person. (e ) H ook or sling, catching person. ( f ) Boom swinging. (g ) Boom breaking. ( h ) Load, struck by, swinging. (1) Load, struck fey, low ering and raising. ■(j) Load falling, slipping cable. (7c) Load failing, breaking hook. (I) Load falling, sling breaking. (m ) L oad falling, machinery breaking. (ft) Load falling, hitch clipping. (o ) Load falling, failu re o f curren t on magnet. (p ) Load falling, not otherwise classified. { q) O bjects fallin g from load. (r ) F alls from crane load. (s ) Falls from crane cab, ear, o r track (not in erecting or riggin g). (t ) Other. 9. W ood stackers. 10. Blocks and tackles, windlasses, capstans, and winches, not otherwise classified. 11. H ay forks, derricks, and stackers. 96 B U SIN E SS M E E T IN G . F . Conveyors. 1. Air hoists. (a ) Objects falling from . (b ) Caught in. (c ) Struck by load. 2. Overhead trolleys. {a ) Objects falling from . (b ) Caught in. (c ) Struck by load. 3. Belt and chain conveyors. (a ) Objects falling from* (b ) Caught in. (c ) Struck by load. 4. Screen conveyors. (a ) Objects falling from . (&) Caught in. (c ) Struck by load. 5. Bucket conveyors. (a ) Objects falling from . (&) Caught in. (e) Struck by load. 6. Platform conveyors and escalators. (a ) O bjects falling from. (b ) Caught in. (c ) Struck by load. The committee recommends that machine accidents should be further classi fied by manner o f occurrence and part o f machine, as fo llo w s : (a ) Manner o f occurrence, machine accidents. (1 ) A djusting machine, tool, or work. (2 ) Starting, stopping, or operating machine. (3 ) Cleaning or oiling machine. (4 ) Repairing machine. (5 ) Breaking o f machine or work. (6 ) Flying objects, striking operator. (7 ) Flying objects, striking person oiher than operator. (8 ) A ll other. ( b ) Part o f machine on which accident occurred. (1 ) P oint o f operation. N o te . — Point o f operation means that part o f machine at which w ork is actually inserted and maintained during any process o f form ing, cutting, shaping, or other operation. (2 ) Belts. N o te . — Accidents upon belts, pulleys, shafts, gears, or other driving mechanism or parts thereof which form the con nection between a machine and the prime mover or inter mediate drive, shall be charged to transm ission apparatus. This includes parts attached to the machine. Accidents upon belts, pulleys, shafts, gears, or other driving mechanism, or parts thereof, which connect one part o f the machine with another part o f the same machine, shall be charged to the machine. (3 ) Cranks or eccentrics. (4 ) Flywheels. REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. 97 (&) Part o f machine on w hich accident occurred— Concluded. (5 ) Gears. (6 ) Set screws, keys, and bolts. (7 ) Counterweights. G e n e r a l N o te . — The classification o f part o f machine and manner o f oc currence applies as well to prime movers and hoisting or conveying m ach in ery. as to w orking machines. II. VEHICLES (NOT INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION O F ). A . Cars and Engines— Steam and E lectric Railivays. 1. Train wrecks. (a ) Collisions. (&) Derailments. (c ) Car striking object on track w ithout derailing. 2. Falls from or in. (a ) In getting on or off, in motion. (&) In getting on or off, at rest. (c ) W hile riding on, due to sudden start or stop. {d ) W hile riding on, due to slipping or loss o f balance. (e ) W hile riding on, contact with overhead structure. ( f ) W hile riding on, contact with side structure. (g ) Falls, not otherwise classified. 3. Struck by or caught between. (a ) W hile coupling or uncoupling. (&) W hile switching. ( c ) W hile repairing cars or engines. (d ) W hile repairing track. ( e ) W hile crossing track. ( f ) W hile standing or w alking on track. 4. Other causes. (a ) Setting or releasing hand brakes. (Exclude, falls due to.) (b ) Objects falling from . (N ot in loading or unloading.) (c ) O bjects shifting on load. ( d ) A ll other. B. M ine and Quarry Cars and M otors. 1. Collisions. 2. Derailments. 3. Falls from , due to sudden start or stop. 4. F alls from riding on tail chain. 5. Riding on, contact w ith roof. 6. Riding on, contact w ith rib or side structure. 7. Caught between, and overhead obstruction. 8. Struck by or caught between while coupling or switching. 9. Struck by, not otherwise classified. 10. Braking. 11. Spragging. 12. L iftin g or pushing car. 13. Caught or struck by rope or chain. 14. Caught by car or load in dumping. 15. Getting on or off car. 16. Struck or caught between, not otherwise classified. N ote .— I n clud e h ere a n im a l d raw n m ine or q u a rry ca rs. 124247°— 19------- 7 98 B U SIN E SS M E E T IN G . C. Plant, Trucks on Tracks. 1. Collisions. 2. Derailments. 3. Falls from , due to sudden start or stop. 4. Falls from riding on tail chain. 5. Riding on, contact w ith roof. 6. Riding on, contact w ith rib or side structure. 7. Caught between, and overhead obstruction. 8. Struck by or caught between, while coupling or switching. 9. Struck by, not otherwise classified. 10. Braking. 11. Spragging. 12. L ifting or pushing car. 13. Caught or struck by rope or chain. 14. Caught by car or load in dumping. 15. Getting on or off car. 16. Struck or caught between, not otherwise classified. D . Autom obiles and Other P ow er V ehicles. 1. Collisions, skidding. 2. Collisions, breaking o f parts. 3. Collisions, all other. 4. Overturning, skidding. 5. Overturning, breaking o f parts. 6. Overturning, all other. 7. Struck by. 8. Collisions w ith cars or enginea 9. Cranking. 10. Engines, not otherwise classified. 11. Breaking o f car or part not resulting in collision o r overturning. 12. Falls from. 13. Objects falling from. 14. Objects shifting on load. 15. Mechanical unloading. 16. All other. N o t e . — All collisions o f autom obiles should be classed under automobiles, whether with other vehicles or w ith cars. Accidents due to the engine in an automobile or other pow er vehicle should be charged to the pow er vehicle. Accidents due to testing gas or gasoline engines should be charged to prime movers. E. B icycles. F. A irplanes. G. Animal-drawn Vehicles ( not M ine o r Quarry C ars>. 1. Collisions with cars or engines. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 30. Collisions with other vehicles. Collisions w ith stationary objects. Overturning. Whiffletrees. Falls from. Struck by. Objects fallin g from (n ot in loading or u nloadin g}. O bjects shifting on load. Breaking o f parts* REPORT OF C O M M IT T E E O K STATISTICS. G. Animal-drawn Vehicles ( not Mine or Quarry (Jars) — Concluded. 11. Mechanical unloading. 12. All other. N o t e . — All vehicle accidents due to runaways should be charged to anim als ( X - A - 3 ) . H. Animal-drawn Im plem ents ( not M ach inery). I. W ater Craft. 1. Collisions w ith vessels. 2. Collisions with other objects. 3. Capsizing. 4. Hawsers and other ropes. 5. Falls from, or jum ping overboard. 6. Falls from , rigging. 7. Falls into, hatchway. 8. All other. N o t e . — Accidents from machinery on w ater craft should be charged to the specific machine. J. All other Vehicles. III. EXPLOSIONS, ELECTRICITY, FIRES, A N D HOT SUBSTANCES. A . B oilers and Steam-pres sure Apparatus. 1. Steam boilers, explosions of. 2. Steam boilers, escaping steam and hot water. 3. Steam boilers, all other causes. 4. Steam pipes, explosions of. 5. Steam pipes, all other causes. 6. Steam and hot water gauges, explosions of. 7. Steam and hot water gauges, all other causes. 8. Economizers and superheaters, explosions of. 9. Economizers and superheaters, all other causes. 10. Other steam-pressure apparatus, explosions of. 11. Other steam-pressure apparatus, all other causes. B . Explosions o f E xplosive Substances. 1. Explosives, m anufacturing and storing. 2. Explosives, transportation and handling. 3. Explosives, blasting. (a ) Premature shot. (&) Misfires or delayed shot. ( c ) W indy sh ot (tf) Tamping. ( e ) All other. 4. Dust. 5. Gas. 6. Gasoline and other petroleum products. 7. A ll other. C. Other Explosions. 1. Ammonia apparatus. 2. Other high-pressure apparatus. 3. All other. N o t e . — Includes accidents due to bursting under pressure. D. E lectricity. E. Conflagrations. N o te . — Give description o f individual conflagration or catastrophe. 100 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . F . H ot Substances and Flames. 1. H ot water. 2. Asphalt, pitch, and tar. 3. Other hot liquids. 4. Molten metal, explosions of. 5. Molten metal at furnace or cupola. 6. Molten metal, pouring. 7. Molten metal or slag, all other. 8. Radiant heat from incandescent metal. 9. Metal not molten, handling of. 10. H ot surfaces, contact with. 11. Oxyacetylene or electric cutting and welding. 12. Flames, clothing. 13. Flames, all other. 14. All other hot objects. IV. POISONOUS AND CORROSIVE SUBSTANCES AND OCCUPATIONAL D ISEASES. N ote.— In case o f occupational disease or industrial poisoning, it is desirable to subdivide specifically so as to show each occupational disease or poisoning. In the present state o f knowledge in regard to the subject it is not possible to prepare a satisfactory code.1 It must be built up as various occupational diseases and poisonings are reported and experience is accumulated. F or this purpose it is especially desirable that detailed inform ation should be published rather than general groups w hich w ill conceal the exact name o f the disease or poison. The correlation o f this inform ation with industry and occupation is also exceedingly important. V . FALLS OF PERSONS. A. From E levations. 1. Benches, boxes, chairs, and tables. 2. Bridges, dams, and docks (n ot in construction or dem olition). 3. Cranes, derricks, elevators, and hoists in erecting and rigging. 4. Elevated bins, pockets, and tanks. N ote.— I nclude here falls from , but not falls into. 5. Buildings in construction or dem olition not elsewhere specified. 6. Floors, tem porary. 7. Ladders. (a ) Breaking o f ladder or parts. (&) Slipping, twisting, or fall o f ladder. (c ) K nocked off ladder. ( d ) All other. 8. Scaffolds and stagings. (a ) B reaking or slipping. (&) Breaking o f tackle or support. (c ) Tilting o f scaffold. ($ ) Tilting or falling o f loose plank. (e ) Other. 9. Boilers, engines, and machines. N ote.— Include platform s or w alkw ays on, but riot stairw ays lead ing thereto. 1A tentative code for occupational diseases which has been prepared by the W orkm en's Compensation Service Bureau, 18 P ark Row, N ew York City, w ill be found to be helpful. REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. 101 A. From Elevations— Concluded. 10. Piles. 11. Poles and trees. 12. Roofs. 13. Runways, balconies, and platform s (not loading pla tform s). 14. Loading platforms. 15. Gangplanks. 16. Stairs and steps. N ote.— Include all falls on stairs, steps, or landings. 17. Tram w ays and trestles. 18. W indow s and wall openings. 19. All other. B. In to Excavations, Pits, and Shafts. 1. Bins and vats containing hot or corrosive substances. 2. Bins and vats, all other. 3. Floor openings (not elevator sh afts). 4. Manholes. 5. Excavations, not otherwise classified. C. On Level. 1. Slipping. 2. Stumbling over fixed objects. 3. Stumbling over loose objects. N ote.— I nclude here stepping on rolling objects. 4. All other. N ote.— Strains due to near falls from slipping or stumbling, w ith out falling, should be placed under slipping or stumbling in this group. V I. STEPPING ON OR STRIKING AGAIN ST OBJECTS. A. Stepping on Objects. 1. Nails. 2. All other sharp objects. N o te . — Stepping on rolling* objects should be charged to stumbling. B. Striking against O bjects. 1. Nails. 2. Splinters or sharp projections from walls or structures. 3. Other fixed objects. 4. Fellow employee. 5. All other objects. VII. FALLING OBJECTS— NOT BEING HANDLED BY INJURED. A. Collapse o f— • 1. Buildings and walls. 2. Piles (stacked, stored, or piled-up m aterial). 3. Scaffolds or staging. 4. Chutes, conveyors, and slides. 5. All other. B. From Elevations. 1. Buildings not in course o f construction or demolition. 2. Bins and pockets. 3. Tram w ays and trestles. 4. Runways, balconies, and platform s. 102 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . B. From Elevations— Concluded. 5. Racks and shelves. 6. Floor openings (not elevator sh a fts). 7. Chutes, conveyors, slides, and screens, 8. Machines and workbenches. 9. Piles (stacked, stored, or piled-up m aterial). N ote.— E xclude accidents in piling or handling o f material, 10. Dumps— at mines and quarries. 11. Buildings in course o f construction or dem olition (not otherwise classified). 12. Scaffolds and staging. 13. Tem porary floors. 14. Floor openings— in building construction. 15. Other elevations. C. Trees. 1. Trees in felling (not otherwise classified). N ote.— I nclude dead limbs and tops. 2. Trees lodged in felling. N ote.— IncliTde trees and limbs struck by felled tree. 3. Trees, kickbacks of, in felling. 4. Spring poles— flybacks of. 5. Limbs, not in felling trees. 6. Trees, not in felling. D. O bjects Tipping over {ex cep t V eh icles). N ote.— E xclude objects which tip over while being handled. E. In to Excavations. 1. Ditches and trenches. 2. Other excavations (not tunnels, mines, or qu arries). F. Cave-ins ( not Mines or Q uarries). 1. Ditches and trenches. 2. Tunnels. 3. Other excavations. G. In Tunnels. B . In Mines and Quarries— In sid e. N ote.— I nclude all accidents from failing objects in mines and quarries. 1. Coal, rock, and ore at the w orking face (n ot r o o f). N ote.— I nclude rolls o f coal or rock, but exclude accidents in stopes and all pillar robbing. 2. Coal, rock, and ore from pillars o r ribs (n ot r o o f). N ote.— I nclude rolls o f coal or rock. 3. Coal, rock, and ore from or in underground chutes, manways, and bat teries. N ote.— Include rushes o f coal, rock, or gob in same. 4. R o o f in working places (n ot stopes). 5. R o o f in entries. 6. Ore and rock in stopes (m etal m ines). 7. Tim bers (not in handling). 8. From surface into shaft. 9. From cage into shaft. 10. From or in underground bins. 11. Cave-in o f mine. ; 1?. All other. REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON ST ATISTICS. V III. HANDLING OF OBJECTS. A. H eavy Objects. N ote.— E xclude handling o f objects by power appliances. Include objects set in motion by the handling o f other objects. 1. Objects dropped. N ote.— I nclude tipping over o f object handled. 2. Objects thrown. 3. Objects falling from load (w hile loading or unloading). 4. Objects falling, from pile (w hile piling or u npiling). 5. Caught between object handled and other object. 6. Strain in handling. N ote.— Include only strains, hernias, etc., caused by excessive weight o f object handled. 7. Handling (not otherwise classified). B . Sharp or Rough O bjects. N ote.— I nclude only injuries due to sharpness or roughness o f object han dled, not tools or machines. , 1. Glass. 2. Protruding nails in objects handled. 3. Protruding wires. 4. Sheet metal and sheet-metal objects. 5. Slivers, wood. 6. Slivers, metal. 7. Castings. 8. Bones, 9. A lf other. C. Hand Trucks, Carts, and W heelbarrow s. 1. Struck by truck handled by injured person. 2. Struck by truck handled by coworker. 3. Caught between truck and other object. 4. Object falling from (not ia loading or unloadin g). 5. Overturning. 6. All other. IX . HAND TOOLS* A. In Hands o f In ju red W orker. 1. Glancing or slipping o f tool in use. 2. Breaking or coming apart o f tool. 3. Flying particles set in motion by tooL (a ) Nails and spikes. ( b ) Metal chips. (c ) Stone. (d ) All other. 4. All other. B . In Hands o f Fellow W orker. 1. Glancing or slipping o f toof fet use. 2. Breaking or com ing apart o f tool. 3. Flying particles set in motion by tooL {a ) Nails and spikes. (&) Metal chips. (c ) Stone. (d ) All other. 4. All other. N ote.— Causes given show manner ©£ occurrence. causes o f accidents may be listed. Principal tools found as 104 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . X. A N IM A L S. A. D ra ft Anim als. 1. K icks and stepped on. 2. Bites. 3. Runaways. N ote.— I nclude all vehicle accidents due to runaways. 4. All other. B. Other Animals. N ote.— Specify any animals which may be especially important. XI. MISCELLANEOUS CAUSES. 1. Flying particles (not otherwise classified). N ote.— Chips, dust, sparks, and other particles set in m otion by w ork ing machines or tools are to be charged to the specific machine or tool. The above number relates only to nonassigned flying particles. 2. Doors, windows, covers, and gates, exclusive o f elevators. 3. Drenching (n ot drow n in g). 4. H eat prostration and sunstroke. 5. Cold, including frostbites. 6. Lightning. 7. Violence o f coemployee. 8. Violence, all other. 9. W restling, sparring, and horseplay. N ote.— Include all accidents directly attributable to horseplay, giving description o f horseplay accidents. 10. Compressed air (not explosions). 11. All other. Dr. E. H. D ow n ey, Chairman, Special D epu ty, Insurance D epartm ent, H arrisburg, Pa. L. W. H a tc h , Vice Chairman, Chief Statistician, State Industrial Commission, A lbany, N. Y . C h a r le s H. V e r r ill, S ecretary, U. S. Em ployees' Compensation Commission, W ashington, D. C. P. A. B roderick, Statistician, Industrial A ccident Board, B oston , Mass. W . H. B urhop , S ecretary, Compensation Insurance Board, Madison, Wis. T. N. D ean , Statistician, W orkm en's Compensation Board, T oronto, Ontario, Canada. H ugh S. H a n n a , U. S. Bureau o f Labor Statistics, W ashington, D. C. C. B. H e n sle y , Statistician, California Industrial A ccident Commission, San Francisco, Calif. Dr. R oyal M eeker , Commissioner, U. S. Bureau o f Labor Statistics, Washington, D. C. E. E. W atson , A ctu a ry , Industrial Commission, Columbus, Ohio. REPORT OF C O M M IT TE E ON STATISTICS. 105 CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS BY LOCATION AND NATURE OF INJURY AND EXTENT OF DISABILITY. The committee recommends the follow in g changes: The brief introductory statement under the title should be omitted. MULTIPLE INJURIES. The paragraph in regard to multiple injuries, page 84, should be transferred to page 81, immediately following the main title: “ In case o f an injury involving more than one location "or one nature o f injury, as specified above, as a rule the injury should be placed in that classi fication which indicates the most serious disability. I f one or more dismember ments are involved, each should be separately listed. I f the injury is a tem porary disability only, it may be charged to the general part o f the body, but if it is a permanent disability the above rule should be strictly follow ed.” I. LOCATION OF INJURY. Under this heading the follow ing should be added: “ N ote.— I f the injury extends ultim ately to a part o f the body other than that first affected, charge to the m ajor part finally involved.’’ II. NATURE OF INJURY. The classification should be amended to read as fo llo w s : 1. Bruises, contusions, and abrasions. 2. Burns and scalds. 3. Concussions. 4. Cuts, punctures, and lacerations. 5. Amputation, traumatic. 6. Dislocations. 7. Fractures. 8. Sprains and strains. 9. Asphyxiation. 10. Drowning. 11. All other. N ote.— I n case o f infection, nature o f in ju ry should be correlated with the infection. This is especially im portant in cases o f bruises, contusions, and abrasions, burns and scalds, and cuts and lacerations. III. EXTENT OF DISABILITY. The classification should be amended to read as fo llo w s : 1. Fatal. 2. Permanent total disability— dismemberment. 3. Permanent total disability— other. 106 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Tem porary Tem porary partial disability— dismemberment. partial disability— total loss o f use. partial disability— impairment o f use. partial disability— disfigurement. partial disability— other. total disability. partial disability. IV. DEGREE OF PABTIAL DISABILITY. In the first line o f the note the w ord “ injuries ” should be changed to “ disabilities.” ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The following officers for the ensuing year were elected: President, George A. Kingston, commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation Board o f Ontario, Canada; vice president, W ill J. French, member of the Industrial Accident Commission o f California; secretary-treasurer, Royal Meeker, United States Commissioner o f Labor Statistics, Washington, D. C. The new executive committee consists o f Charles* S. Andrus, chairman o f the Illinois Industrial Commission; F. W. Armstrong, vice chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of Nova Scotia, together with the incoming officers and the outgoing president o f the association, Mr. Fred M. Wilcox, member o f the Wisconsin Industrial Commission. The next annual convention o f the association will be held at Toronto, Canada, September 23-26, 1919. RESOLUTIONS. Resolutions relating to the business o f the Association were adopted, o f which the following are the most significant: 1. W e contemplate w ith much encouragement the development o f w orkm en’s compensation and the accom panying growth o f the kindred movement for the promotion o f safety among the hosts o f industrial w orkers w ithin a period com paratively recent in the States and Provinces o f North Am erica. A better day dawned in the industrial w orld when these most helpful agencies were instituted among men. M indful o f continuing widespread mourning and heavy sacrifice o f usefulness the steady reduction o f these grievous losses is a source o f deep satisfaction. Conscious o f the im perfections o f the compensation service we may well view with pride and gratification the more equitable and humane consideration o f the unfortunate victim s o f industrial accident, the smaller and less w asteful levies upon industrial enterprise and progress, and the con sequently more harmonious and mutually helpful relations between workmen and employers through the introduction and development o f this important system. In feeling our way along dim trails or untrodden paths it were strange indeed if mistakes were not m anifest and improvement required, but the rec ord justifies indulgence o f the hope that we shall profit by these mistakes and continue to more nearly approach ideal standards and irreproachable methods. T o this end we pledge the highest endeavor o f ourselves and our several ju ris dictions. In this endeavor we crave the practical and sympathetic cooperation o f good men and women everywhere. RESOLUTIONS* 107 2. Tlie association desires to place on record Its sense o f appreciation o f the services o f the United States Bureau o f Labor Statistics, and particularly the Commissioner o f the Bureau, Dr. R oyal Meeker, for the invaluable services rendered to the association during the past two years. W e recognize that the services o f the Bureau are alm ost absolutely essential to the continued successful carrying out o f the w ork o f this association and we express the hope that the Bureau under the able adm inistration o f Dr. Meeker w ill be able to continue heading up the secretarial branch o f the w ork for w hich he has shown such excellent qualification. 3. In the opinion o f the association the executive committee should place at the disposal o f the secretary a sum not exceeding $500 to be disbursed by him and accounted for in the usual way, in paying for special clerical services re quired in the conduct o f the secretarial w ork o f the association. 4. The association desires to place on record its appreciation o f the courtesy shown by the Gisholt Co., the North W estern Ordnance Co., and the Board o f Commerce o f the City o f Madison in entertaining the members o f the conven tion on the occasion o f the fifth annual meeting. The strain o f sitting through three sessions daily listening to addresses and participating in the discussion is very trying, and the thoughtful courtesies thus extended afford both a necessary relief and a very pleasant memory. 5. The association desires to bear testimony to the good offices and kindly courtesies extended to the members o f the convention by the Industrial A cci dent Board o f W isconsin, as well as by the officers and members o f the staff, on the occasion o f this fifth annual convention, and especially for the services o f its reporters in taking a record o f the convention proceedings. W e feel sure also that all the members here assembled w ill carry away a conception o f an ideal city, which those o f us who did not know Madison before had not hitherto entertained. 6. That w e desire to place on record our appreciation o f the action o f H is H onor Gov. Philipp, o f this State o f W isconsin, in granting the association the privilege o f holding its convention meeting in the rooms o f this magnificent capitol b u ild in g ; also o f his courtesy in coming to address the convention, and for his cordial w ords o f welcom e so amply seconded by many o f the citizens o f this State during our short visit in Madison. 7. This association desires to commend in the strongest possible terms the action o f our Government in prosecuting the w ar against Germany with the greatest possible vigor. W e recognize that we are fighting an enemy who has lost, if he ever pos sessed it, all sense o f what is right and honorable and decent in his relation to other nations, whose only conception o f rule hitherto has been that o f brute force, and who has been found guilty before the great forum o f civilization o f every crime in the decalogue. To bargain for peace with such an enemy under present conditions may be likened to a man bargaining with a burglar who has stolen all he could get hands on and ravished, if not murdered, the fam ily besides. W e believe there can be only one way to deal with such an enemy, and we note with the greatest possible satisfaction the fixed determination o f all the allied Governments to prosecute the w ar until the enemy is driven back into his own country, and those o f their rulers who are responsible for this world catastrophe are made to suffer that punishment which their crim e against humanity so ju stly deserves. 108 BU SIN E SS M E E T IN G . Upon recommendation of the secretary that the I. A. I. A. B. C. amalgamate with the Association of Government Labor Officials, the following resolution was adopted: R esolved , That the executive committee be authorized and instructed to confer with the executive committee o f the Association o f Government Labor Officials as to the advisability o f the consolidation o f the tw o organizations, and if in the judgment o f said committees said consolidation seems to be advisable, that a referendum vote by mail be taken o f the membership o f both said organi zations on the proposition o f consolidation. I f a m ajority o f the membership o f each o f said organizations vote in favor o f consolidation the executive com mittee is further authorized to arrange w ith the executive committee o f the labor officials for a join t meeting o f the tw o organizations in 1919 at which time the proposed consolidation may be consummated. W E D N E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 25 — A F T E R N O O N S E S S IO N . Visits -were made by the delegates to the Gisholt plant and other industrial establishments in Madison. W E D N E S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 2 5 — E V E N IN G S E S S IO N . Chairman, Harry A . Hacker, Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Board. III. STA TISTIC AL SESSION. AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE AS FUNDAMENTAL IN ACCIDENT STUDY. BY LUCIAN W. CHANEY, SPECIAL AGENT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. The mere enumeration o f accident cases has little meaning. Sup pose, for purposes o f illustration, that 40,000 accidents are recorded in one State and 50,000 in another. The principal result o f such records is to arouse curiosity and lead to further questioning. There will emerge almost immediately the question “ How many people in each State were exposed to the hazards which produced the recorded accidents ? ” Unless some reasonably accurate answer can be given no beginning can be made toward the interpretation o f the accident figures. Suppose that inquiry develops that the first o f these States has 200,000 industrial workers while the second has 300,000. The frequency rate per 1,000 exposed will be 200 for the first State and 167 for the second. This reverses the quantitative relation and manifestly gives some definite idea o f the accident con ditions in the two States as compared one with the other. It should be admitted at once that in a group o f such varied char acter as the industrial population o f an entire State the significance o f such rates for certain purposes is lessened by the fact that the hazards are not shared equally. This condition is, however, always present in greater or less degree. No two persons o f a given occu pation Ijave actually and precisely the same hazards. Much confusion will be avoided if it be kept clearly in mind that there are two quite distinct things disclosed by accident rates: (1) Prevalence in the group under consideration; (2) degree o f hazard incident to certain machines or processes. To illustrate, the rates quoted above, 200 per 1,000 exposed in one State and 167 in another, disclose, in proportion to the accuracy o f the basic data, the prevalence o f accident among the workers of one State as compared with the other. These rates do not justify the conclusion that industry is conducted in a more hazardous man ner in the State having the higher rate. This could be determined only by a process o f finding the exposure and the accident occurrence for constantly narrowing industrial groups until occupational groups are reached. Suppose that the exposure in both States o f those 109 110 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. operating latlies is determined and on relating this to lathe accidents it is found that one State has a frequency of 67 per 1,000 exposures while the other has a frequency o f 90. It would then be justifiable to conclude that the hazard o f lathe operation in the second State was higher than in the first. Eates always have significance as disclosing prevalence. In the matter o f hazard from particular machines or conditions, the signifi cance is slight in extended groups, such as an entire State, but stead ily increases as the determination is narrowed to industries, depart ments, and finally to occupations. The point here emphasized is that in this whole process by which conclusions are finally reached regarding hazard, the amount o f exposure is a fundamental factor without knowledge and use o f which no really intelligible results are possible. Before offering further illustration, a word regarding the nomen clature o f the subject is pertinent* We have inherited from European sources, where these matters were studied before we began, the use o f full-time or 300-day worker as the standard expression for the fundamental unit. In my judgment, there would be great gain if this association would break away from this inheritance and boldly adopt a terminology o f its own. I would adopt as the name of the funda mental unit the expression “ industrial unit.” I would define it as “ the equivalent o f one man engaged in industry for 3,000 hours or 300 days of 10 hours ea ch / I would use this industrial unit under various names in a great variety o f discussions. I f considering labor, I would say, for example, that product was so much per 1,000 units o f labor. I f accident was under discussion, the formula would be so many cases per 1,000 units of exposure. I f labor turnover was the subject, I would say so many separations per 1,000 units o f employ ment. These different forms o f expression simply mark the different aspects from which the industrial unit may be viewed. Nunferically, in a given plant, the number o f units would be the same whether they were designated as exposure, labor, or employment. The m odifying words call attention to the particular phase o f the general subject which is being considered. The growing tendency to use “ amount o f exposure” in treating accident data suggests that the matter deserves consideration from a broader standpoint. Further illustration o f the importance o f amount o f exposure will be drawn from the experience o f the State o f Wisconsin. In 1917 the Federal bureau received from the Wisconsin Industrial Commis sion an elaborate classification o f accidents according to causes for the year 1916. In comment upon this it was suggested that a single year did not afford sufficient volume in the smaller divisions to give “ A M O U N T OF EXPO SU RE ” IN ACC ID E N T STU D Y — L . W . C H A N E Y . H I a fair statistical average and that it was highly desirable to apply the. system o f time allowances accepted by this association in order that severity rates might be computed. Recently a compilation has come to hand covering a three-year period and having a complete application o f the scheme of timet allowances accepted by this association. In response to request the commission has furnished a carefully worked out approximation o f the amount o f exposure in the State for those among whom the accidents occurred. It is desired to show by combination o f these items o f information something fur ther regarding the value as a base of even an approximate determina tion o f the amount o f exposure. The calculation of rates for causes, as is here done, is not altogether new but is still so unfamiliar that a few introductory statements are justified. In mortality studies the method o f splitting up a community death rate by causes has long been used. A general rate of 14, for example? in a certain city will be found to consist o f 5 for tuberculosis, 2 fo r pneumonia, and 7 for other causes. It may be urged that hazard o f a particular disease is common to the entire population, while danger from a particular accident cause is confined to a few. It is far from being the case that disease hazard causing death is uniformly distributed. Some people go through their days with no more danger from smallpox than from corn shred ders. In both cases rates give an idea o f the average prevalence o f certain conditions in a population, part o f whom are exposed and part are not. Rate tables will shortly be published in the M o n t h l y L a b o r R e v ie w showing both frequency and severity rates for a condensed list o f the causes shown in the Wisconsin compilation. These are divided into two groups, according to the exposure available. First, there will be a table presenting causes for the entire number of people who are covered by the compensation act. Second, there will be a supple mentary tabte devoted to the section o f the industrial population engaged in manufacture. In this latter will be shown the rates for the different types of machines operated. On considering these tables it is found in the first table that, excluding cases o f temporary disa bility o f seven days and less, the general frequency rate of the State o f Wisconsin is 40.7 cases per 1,000. This rate is made up in part by the following in the order o f frequency: Handling objects, 8.6 cases; machinery, 7.7 cases; falls o f person, 5.4 cases; falling objects, 4.2 cases; hand tools, 3.1 cases; hot and corrosive substances, 2.1 cases; cranes and hoists, 1.3 cases; wagons and carriages, 1.3 cases. The point here made is that this series o f rates by which we gain a just idea o f the prevalence o f certain types of accidents in Wiscon 112 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. sin, considered as a unit, is wholly impossible without some sort o f an approximation to the number o f 3,000-hour exposures. This may be very crude and imperfect, but, however open to criticism it may be on the score o f strict' accuracy, it forms the only means possible to approach the intricate subject o f the statistical study o f accident causes. It is instructive to notice the severity rates for the same cause groups, also arranged in the descending order o f severity. The State o f Wisconsin shows a severity rate of 5.9 days per 3,000-hour exposure. Machinery heads the list with 1.40 days, followed by falls o f person, 0.77 day; falling objects, 0.76 day; handling objects, 0.45 day; wagons and carriages, 0.37 day; cranes and hoists, 0.32 d a y ; hot and corrosive substances, 0.14 day; hand tools, 0.06 day. It will be observed immediately that the order is not the same for severity as for frequency. Handling objects, which heads the list in frequency, drops to fourth place in severity. From the standpoint o f the present paper the significance of this lies in the fact that with out some common base to which these diverse elements o f number o f cases and number o f days lost can be referred it is not possible to secure any notion o f the true relation. When the common base of 3,000-hour exposures is applied, frequency and severity rates are obtained which together answer more questions regarding accident data and answer them more accurately than any statistical device hitherto utilized. The need o f analysis o f the exposure as determined for a whole State into successively smaller elements may be illustrated by ex cerpts from the table devoted to rates for machines. During the three years covered by the compilation the exposure for all workers covered by the compensation act was 1,007,826 3,000-hour exposures. In manufacturing there were 745,915 3,000-hour exposures. When the entire industrial population is used as a base o f ref erence, the rate for machines used in manufacture is 7.5 cases per 1,000 exposures. When the consideration is narrowed to the#portion o f the population engaged in manufacture, the rate increases to 10.2. The first rate indicates the prevalence o f machine accidents among the industrial population taken as a whole; the second, the prevalence in the portion o f the population devoted to manufacture. O f this rate the larger part is furnished by two sorts o f ma chines, namely, metal working, with 3.6 cases per 1,000 exposures, and wood working, with 3.2 cases. These two groups of machines also exceed in severity, having 1.11 days per exposure out of a total o f 1.86 days. These relatively high rates would at once suggest that such ma chines deserved extra attention to determine whether there were not possible measures o f prevention applicable. “ A M O U N T OF EXPO SURE ” IN ACCID EN T STU D Y — L . W . C H A N E Y . 113 A fter presenting these illustrations in an effort to make clear how important knowledge o f the amount o f exposure is to the proper understanding of accident data, the question naturally arises regard ing the method o f securing the needed figure. The simplest and most direct method is possible in those plants where a time-clock system is in use. The time cards o f the em ployees record exactly the hour o f arrival and departure. The dif ference is the time at work, with as much exactness as it is possible to determine. Since where time is kept in this way it is very common to pay by the hour, the time at work must be ascertained, and the addition o f these amounts gives directly the production hours of the depart ment. In some cases where the clocks are used simply as a check upon attendance, and their records are not employed in computing wages— as, for example, where all wages are on a piecework basis— some additional labor would be necessary to determine the total hours. This figure has so many uses that concerns can well afford this additional labor in order to have the means to compute labor costs accurately. The record o f total hours is convertible into an equivalent in terms o f annual exposure by dividing it by 3,000. The uniform use o f equivalents in terms of the 3,000-hour year is strongly to be urged. It is very common to compute two sets o f rates comparable among themselves but wholly incomparable with each other. This has arisen from the natural tendency to compile data monthly and annually. For monthly purposes the total hours will be divided by 250, one-twelfth o f 3,000. Using the resulting figures for a series of months gives, as stated, rates perfectly com parable with each other but requiring to be modified before they will compare with annual rates. On the other hand, if the determination o f equivalents is always on an annual basis the entire system o f rates becomes comparable throughout with no need for modification. This method o f procedure does produce figures for each month which have a somewhat strange appearance. The total number on the pay roll is usually the thing considered as indicating the activity for a particular month. Division of the total hours for a month by 250 gives a figure sufficiently similar to the ordinary pay-roll total to seem appropriate. The result o f division by 3,000 has no apparent relation to the accustomed figure. The difficulty arises from the fact that the introduction of the time element into the situation is not yet a familiar one. It is recog nized easily enough that a man working 8 hours at a given task is less exposed to its hazards than a man working 10 hours at an iden tical task. The feeling is strong, however, that “ a man’s a man for 124247°— 19-------8 114 S T A T IS T IC A L SESSION. a 5 that ” and that the attempt to express him in equivalents for sta tistical purposes does not sufficiently respect his personality. It is quite evident, however, that without this process of determin ing equivalents an even approximately exact presentation of the facts is impossible. When a statistical equivalent is necessary that one should be adopted which gives most directly the largest body of comparable results. In many plants the record of hours is not kept but that of days worked is. In such a case it is often possible to determine a con stant for the average daily hours in the department. For example, in a department in which there is some variation in hours it is found that the average is 9J hours. I f in a given period 20,000 €lays of work are done this will be approximately equal to 190,000 hours. This divided by 3y000 will give the usual equivalent, in this case 63i 3,000-hour exposures. In still other plants it may be necessary to resort to another device. Suppose it is possible to obtain an average annual employment by using a quarterly average’, or better still a monthly average. This may then be multiplied by the number o f days during the year on which the department was in operation. Such a procedure will give a number o f “ man days,” which divided by 300 will give exposure in the ordinary terms. Finally there is the case where payments in wages and some in formation regarding wage rates are the only available items. Sup pose this to consist o f a single pay roll and the total wage payment fo r the year. From the pay roll it is learned that in a given depart ment there were— 10 15 20 .30 men at men,at men at men at 80 70 60 40 cents cents cents cents 75 per per per per hmir___________________________ i.----------------------------- $8. hour_______________________________________________ 10. hour_________________________ ._____________________ 12. hour_______________________________________________ 12. 00 50 00 00 42.50 The total hourly earnings divided by 75, the total number o f men5 gives 57 cents as the average hourly rate. I f the annual payments in the departments were $136,800, this divided by 57 cents would give 240,000 hours as the total hours of employment. This divided by 3,000 gives an annual exposure of 80. Such a procedure gives a close approximation, provided there have been no considerable wage fluctuations. The wage rates above are the high rates now prevalent. I f wages were lower earlier in the period it would be necessary to consider that fact and also the length o f time during which the different rates prevailed. To illustrate, assume in the department mentioned above three wage periods in the course o f a year: (1) 3 months with 70 men and “ A M O U N T OF EXPO SURE ” IN ACCID EN T STU D Y ---- L . W . C H A N E Y . 115 hourly earnings o f $35; (2) six months with 80 men and hourly earnings of $44; (3) 3 months with 75 men and hourly earnings of $42.50. In order to get a true average annual exposure it is necessary to introduce the time factor. Multiplying the number in each group of men by the time factors 3, 6, and 3, and adding the results gives 915. Treating hourly earnings in the same manner gives $496.50. Dividing $496.50 by 915 gives 54 cents as the average hourly rate for the year. Dividing this again into the annual payment of $136,800 gives 253,333 as the total hours worked. This divided by 3,000 gives 84 as the annual exposure instead o f 80 indicated when the figures for the last three months were considered alone. . By the application o f these methods it is nearly always possible to secure a reasonable approximation to the exposure expressed in terms o f 3.000 hours per year. It may be objected that results are largely modified by the method of procedure and that it is unsafe to combine those obtained by one method with those derived in another way. A number o f careful and extensive tests indicates that the final rates which result from using these methods are not sufficiently different to modify the conclusions derivable from them. I f the volume of data is sufficient to be reasonably trustworthy, the methods outlined above may be used in determining the basic figure of exposure without hesitation, and those obtained by the different methods may be combined. To recapitulate the methods o f securing an approximate “ indus trial unit” as a base for all forms o f industrial study: 1. Use actual hours as recorded by time clocks. Reduce these to a usable equivalent by dividing by 3,000. 2. When days of work are recorded determine the average length in hours in each department. Multiply this by the number of recorded days. Divide by 3,000. 3. When average employment and days in operation o f the de partments are available multiply these together and divide by 300. 4. When it is possible from one or more pay rolls to determine an average hourly or daily rate this may be divided into the total wage payments, giving total hours or days worked. These figures may be divided by 3,000 or 300, respectively, to give the desired unit. After determining exposure for one year by the methods here out lined or by a combination o f them it may be entirely feasible to utilize constants o f increase or o f decrease for later years. An at tempt to describe fully the development o f such a scheme would unduly prolong this paper. An illustration o f its employment is found in the figures furnished by the Wisconsin commission in con nection with the compilation already used for illustrative purposes. 116 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. The procedure will be given in full in connection with the tables to be issued in the M o n t h l y L a b o r R e v i e w . It has been proposed by some to abandon entirely the attempt to include the man in this consideration and confine attention to de termining relations between accident occurrence and pay roll. . This proposition has the merit o f requiring as basic data items much more readily obtained than is the amount o f exposure. It introduces, however, so many elements o f uncertainty due to the varying rates of payment and other variables that its satisfac tory application would, on the whole, be quite as difficult as the method based on human exposure. In the course of time it may be hoped that accident rates, both frequency and severity, will become sufficiently familiar that the nontechnical reader will have the same sort o f understanding of them that he now has of mortality rates. It would be unfortunate just as this condition is beginning to prevail to introduce a new method probably but little, if any, more easily applied than the one now in use. W H Y TABULATE NONCOMPENSATED ACCIDENTS? B Y L. W . H A T C H , C H IE F S T A T IS T IC IA N , N E W Y O R K ST A TE IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N . When I was asked to discuss at this meeting the question which is the subject o f this paper nothing was said as to why this question should be raised. Considering the tacit assumption that has all along been made by this association and its committee on statistics that non compensated accidents are to be tabulated, the raising of the question now may seem rather late or quite uncalled for. That assumption ap pears in the very first action o f this association concerning accident statistics when, at the meeting in Chicago, in January, 1915, it adopted a standard definition o f a “ tabulatable ” accident identical with the previously established standard definition o f a “ reportable ” accident, which latter included every accident causing loss of time other than the remainder o f the day, turn, or shift on which the acci dent occurred. But during the last three years we have learned much about acci dent statistics by experience, and one o f the things that some o f us have had thus borne in upon us is the great amount of work involved in producing adequate statistics o f accidents and the difficulty of se curing sufficient resources for such work. I venture to think that I give the common situation of accident statisticians to-day when I say that they are forced to a selection only from among various desirable lines o f work. In a word, they have to do what they can and live in hopes o f the rest sometime in the future. Under such circumstances the accident statistician needs to know certainly that any line o f work is sure to have its labor justified by the value o f its results, and that need grows according to the amount o f labor involved. Now, the tabulation o f noncompensated accidents is always a heavy undertaking. In number they run to many times the total o f compensated cases, five times as many in New York State, for example, at the present rate o f reporting, with a total o f 250,000 per year. Another consideration here is that, in the absence of follow-up work for purely statistical purposes, reports o f noncompensated acci dents are more incomplete and defective than those o f compensated cases. The necessity o f exact information for purposes of awarding compensation automatically insures the necessary data for statistical purposes on compensated cases, but for noncompensated accidents there is not the same necessity. Hence, as part of the work required for 117 118 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. tabulation o f noncompensated accidents must be reckoned the task o f securing full reports o f all the necessary data. It is by no means out o f place, therefore, to raise our question, even to the extent of asking whether the assumption that has all along been made is well founded. I f we find no occasion to alter that as sumption, we may at least clarif}^ the grounds for it, and thereby afford support for the efforts of statisticians to bring their work up to the best standards. In order to be concrete as well as most practical, it will be well to take the word “ tabulate ” as meaning tabulate to the extent specified in the standard tables recommended by your committee on statistics.1 That will mean tabulation by industry, cause, nature o f injury, ex tent of disability (time loss), medical aid, wage, sex, and age. Also for present discussion by “ noncompensated ” is to be understood “ tabulatable” accidents (under the definition o f the committee on statistics) in which no compensation for wage loss is paid, whether medical benefits be paid or not. I think we shall arrive most convincingly at conclusions if we re call at the outset that any accident statistics, ta justify themselves, must be o f distinct service for one of the following four purposes, namely: (1) Determination of rates for compensation insurance, (2) prevention o f accidents, (3) equitable and accurate administration of compensation laws, and (4) measurement of current experience. Considering the first o f these, the statistical information necessary for determination of insurance rates comprises the amount o f com pensation or medical aid paid, or to be paid, together with pay-roll exposure, tabulated by industry classifications. This at once indicates that a noncompensated accident is of no significance for this purpose except as medical aid may be paid in connection with it. But under a compensation law requiring payment of medical aid the latter is an indispensable item o f statistical information for the insurance carrier. It is an item which appears, o f course, in connection with compen sated accidents, but tabulations o f it restricted to the latter class of cases would be wholly inadequate. There may be set down, therefore, as one tabulation of noncompensated accidents which is clearly neces sary, one to show medical aid paid in such cases. But as already indicated, this is an item o f significance chiefly for the determination of insurance premiums. F or this, what is neces sary is the same as in case of compensation paid, i. e., tabulations showing amounts paid in comparison with pay-roll exposure by in dustry classifications. For such a tabulation, insurance carriers are practically best, if not solely, able to secure the necessary data, these 1 References to the committee recommendations herein are to those in the report o f the committee published in the M o n t h l y R e v i e w of the U . S. Bureau o f L ab o r Statistics for October, 1917. NO N CO M PEK SATEI> ACCID EN TS— L . W . H A T C H . 119 being automatically a part of their records. T o them, therefore, as chiefly requiring this information and best able to prepare it, this sort o f tabulation o f noncompensated accidents might very well be left. Bear in mind that to propose to leave such tabulation of medi cal aid to carriers does not need to involve loss o f such information to the public. To whatever extent is desirable carriers may and should be required by the appropriate public authority— superin tendent o f insurance or industrial accident board—to furnish for public information the results o f such tabulations. Tabulations of medical aid are as a matter of fact not called for by any of the standard tables recommended by your committee on statistics except one, namely, Table 5. The last column o f that table calls for amount of medical aid for each class of disability, and will involve tabulation of noncompensated accidents for that item. This table is designed mainly to afford the means of comparing cost o f different schedules o f benefits in different States and is useful chiefly from the insurance point of view. As an item in those benefits medi cal aid is o f course essential to afford complete results, and where the data are available should be tabulated. A t the same time it may be pointed out that where data as to medical aid are not available, omission o f that item would not deprive Table 5 of its chief value, which lies in its information as to compensation. This consideration carries greater significance, from the fact that complete data as to medical aid are not easily obtainable, owing not only to the great number o f cases to be handled but also to a special difficulty growing out of the fact that large employers frequently furnish medical aid directly in plant hospitals or by plant physicians in amount exceed ing the requirements o f the law and without allocation o f cost to each ease. The most important tables recommended by the committee, tables 1 to 4, call fo r distribution o f accidents by industries, and by causes, according to extent o f disability, and provide for a division o f tem porary disability cases into those with lost time o f over two weeks, over one to two weeks, and one week or less. Table 5 calls also for distribution of noncompensated accidents according to length of time lost, by days. In any State where the waiting time is over one week, the data for the time loss in noncompensated accidents called for by these tables will involve much the largest amount o f labor and difficulty o f any contemplated by the committee’s scheme. This is because o f the fact previously pointed out, that this data is not _ordinarily developed in the necessary records for making of awards and payment o f compensation, and must be specially secured for the purpose o f supplemental reports in the short-time disability cases, which are most numerous o f all, amounting in New York State, 120 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. for example, to hundreds o f thousands in a year. Let us consider, therefore, how far this labor is worth while. I t is sometimes said that it is important to collect this data so that when the question arises o f reducing waiting time in a statute it may be possible to tell in advance what the effect will be as to numbers of workers to be affected and amount of compensation to be paid. Argument is sometimes made as though such information were indispensable for the settlement o f the question o f whether waiting time should or should not be reduced. But that idea may be dismissed as being from the same cloth as the argument which fre quently cropped up when passage of the first compensation laws was being discussed, it being contended at that time that it would never be safe to pass any such law until it could be determined in advance just what it would cost. Reduction o f waiting time, like enactment o f compensation laws, is not a question o f cost but o f justice, and is being settled on that principle without awaiting determination o f cost, as witness such reduction in 1917 in no less than 9 out o f 31 States having compensation laws before that time. From the point of view of insurance rates, there is something to be said for collecting the data in question in anticipation o f a reduc tion o f waiting time so as to afford more accurate early readjustment o f rates. There are, however, two counterbalancing considerations on this proposition. One is that the assumption that dependable data for rate-making .purposes are possible in the absence o f com pensation requirements whose administration necessitates the re cording o f the data is open to question in the light o f comparisons of statistics o f accident before and since the passage o f compensation laws. The other is that there are now'a sufficient number of States1 having a waiting time o f one week or less to afford a very substan tial body of statistics o f time loss in short-time disability cases, such as the committee table calls for in noncompensated cases in other States, developed under the advantageous conditions attaching to compensated cases. The more dependable data wThich should be available in these States may be regarded, I am inclined to believe (I am almost ready to prophesy that actually they will have to be depended upon for the purpose), as sufficient for necessary advance data for preliminary insurance rating purposes in a State about to reduce wTaiting time under two weeks, at least sufficiently so as to make it necessary to seek other reasons, if there be such, to justify the cost and labor involved in ascertaining time loss in noncompensated accidents. 1 In 1917 there were 15 such States, namely, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Vermont, W ashington, W est Virginia, and Wisconsin. Also the U. S. Employees’ Compensation law limits the w aiting period to less than a week. NO N C O M P E N SA TE D ACCID EN TS— L . W . H A T C H . 121 What has already been said indicates that we must turn to pur poses other than determination o f compensation insurance rates to find reasons for including noncompensated accidents. So far as light on the administration of compensation is concerned, in the nature o f things it is statistics o f compensated cases only that will be of service because the problems o f administration are those of de termining awards in accordance with the provisions of law. It is then from the point of view of accident prevention, or of the related one o f measurement o f increase or decrease in accidents, that the value o f statistics o f noncompensated accidents is to be appraised. More specifically it will be the value o f statistics of frequency and severity by causes and industries, as called for in Tables 1 and 4 recommended by the committee, that chiefly must justify tabula tions o f noncompensated accidents. In many ways, as pointed out in the last report o f the committee, these are the most important tables in the entire list. In order to determine how important it is that the data concerning noncompensated cases called for by these tables should be included, as well as those concerning compensated cases, it will be well to consider just what questions it is to be expected that those tables shall answer. I take it these are three, namely: (1) How do the hazards of differ ent industries compare? (2) How do the hazards from different causes compare? (3) How does the hazard in a given industry or from a given cause compare one year with another ? Theoretically, at least, it would seem to be necessary to have a com plete measure of the hazard in question in order to answer any o f these queries, and for that account would have to be taken of every accidental injury it caused, no matter how trivial. But is such com pleteness o f measure so necessary for practical purposes which statis tics o f accidents can serve as to make it worth the great expense o f securing it solely for that purpose, as in the case of noncompensated accidents? More exactly the question is this: With the differences in hazard which complete statistics o f compensated cases will afford in hand (no one can for a moment question the need of having such statistics), how likely is it that the addition of noncompensated cases, i. e., those causing temporary disability of 14 days or less, would alter the results sufficiently to change conclusions for practical purposes? More concretely, if a safety inspector o f a mutual insurance company in a single industry, for example, has before him full knowledge o f the relative importance of the various hazards which lie must com bat, as measured by the compensable accidents which they cause, will the addition of noncompensated cases to his statistics be likely to show that he did not before properly distinguish between the greater and lesser hazards? Or will a Stat'e safety engineer, with the dif ferences between industries as to hazard as shown by compensated 122 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. cases, be likely to have to revise his selection of industries for tlio purpose o f devoting his attention to the more hazardous? Or, t o cite one more example, will an industrial commission studying in crease or decrease of accidents in its jurisdiction be likely to find conclusions from experience as to compensated accidents alone greatfy at variance from that for all accidents ? A little consideration will, I believe, compel one to answer these questions in the negative. The first point to note is that, to a consid erable extent, relative frequency o f injuries, as between different causes or industries, would not be greatly changed by the addition o f noncompensated cases. It is true that the ratio o f more serious to less serious cases is not constant under different causes or in different industries, but the variation is not so great as to make distribution of compensated cases (that is, deaths, permanent disabilities, and tem porary disabilities of over two weeks’ duration) wholly unreliable as an index o f accident frequency. In the second place, and this is the main consideration, for all practical purposes accident frequency alone, to the extent that the relation o f more to less serious cases is not constant, is o f small value as an index o f hazard. Only when to the factor o f frequency is added the factor o f severity o f injuries can we arrive at any reliable index o f hazards. Now, when the severity element is considered, it is almost entirely compensated accidents which are controlling in the results. This is because o f the enormous difference in weight o f the two classes o f cases when measured by severity. This is well illus trated by the schedule of weighting for severity recommended by the committee on statistics. In that schedule a fatal accident is estimated as equivalent to the loss o f 6,000 days’ time. In a State with a wait ing time o f one week, the average time loss in noncompensated acci dents is bound to be less than three days,1 but if taken at that amount it will be seen that on the average it would take 2,000 noncompen sated cases to equal in importance one fatal case. Or, in such a State, it would take 1,000 noncompensated cases to equal one hand dismemberment, or 100 to balance one loss of finger. A similar com parison for a State with a waiting time o f two weeks, assuming the average time loss of noncompensated cases at six days (an over estimate for the same reason as above indicated), indicates that one death case would equal 1,000 noncompensated cases, one hand loss would balance 500 noncompensated accidents, and one finger dis memberment would equal 50 noncompensated cases. A third consideration bearing on the question is the general fact, which should always be borne in mind in connection with accident 1 Three days would assume an even distribution of cases according to time loss from one day to six days^ whereas it is w ell known that the number o f eases is greater in shorter time grades. N O N C O M P E N SA TE D A CCID EN TS— L . W . H A T C H , 123 statistics, that small differences in results are o f doubtful significance. This is because of the great variableness o f the units which make up the aggregates of accident statistics. No two accidents are exactly alike, so that there is always more or less variation in statistical results which represents pure chance for the particular time or place, instead o f what is typical or permanent for the hazard under consideration. This is true both as to frequency of occurrence and also as to severity o f resulting injuries, but to a greater degree for the latter than for the former. From general considerations such as the foregoing, and in the ab sence of a test thereof by a study of statistical material, which I regret that I have not found time to make for this paper, I am not disposed to press conclusions too far. I am, however, inclined at present to the view that for most practical purposes which accident statistics can serve, the tabulation o f noncompensated accidents is of minor importance. Certainly it is of very minor importance as compared with complete tabulation of compensated cases along the lines laid down by the committee on statistics. Particularly it can be urged that in any State where there is a choice between the two, the securing o f data concerning exposure, necessary for computation o f accident rates, should by all means be undertaken befox^e tabula tion of noncompensated accidents. I emphasize this especially be cause apparently not much progress has yet been made toward the achievement o f accident rates by industrial accident boards or com missions, whereas such statistics are of the very greatest importance from every point of view. The reason for the paucity of this mate rial undoubtedly is the fact that in most States the provisions of law or circumstances o f administration are such as to make necessary special collection o f data for that purpose in addition to that which is automatically recorded in the administration o f compensation laws, and the collection o f that data is a task o f many difficulties and much labor. But it can not be urged too strongly that every State should put the achievement of such data in the very first rank o f importance in its program for accident statistics. Another point, by way of contrast, may also be urged here; that is, that if the inclusion o f noncompensated cases in the tabulations must be at the cost o f less prompt publication of statistics o f com pensated cases to any considerable extent, then their inclusion might well be subordinated to the prompter issuance o f the latter. My observation is that thus far there is still much to be desired along this line o f earlier information as to compensation experience in most States. Do not understand me as arguing against tabulation o f noncom pensated accidents in accordance with the committee’s scheme under any and all circumstances. On the contrary, where a commission 124 ST A TIST IC A L SESSIOH. can afford to do it, in addition to the other statistical work o f greater importance, tabulations of noncompensated accidents should be un dertaken as being the ideal achievement in accident statistics. As suming that that is to be done, there is one further question o f rela tive values that I venture to add; that is, how far the ascertainment o f time lost in each noncompensated case is necessary, when special inquiry to secure that item would be required (as would be the case to a large extent in most States). Doubt on this point is particu larly strong for a State where waiting time is only one week, for in such case absence of exact time loss would not prevent prepara tion of the frequency data called for by the committee’s tables, except to a slight extent, and that at the point o f least moment, in Table 5, which would be an unimportant omission. Even in a State with two weeks’ waiting time the frequency data called for by the committee’s program would be short at the least important point, by failure to secure time loss in each noncompensated case; that is, only in Table 5, as in the case of one week’s waiting time, and in columns 9 and 10 o f Table 1, and columns 7 and 8 o f Table 4. W ith out collection o f time loss in noncompensated cases, it would only be necessary to combine the columns referred to in Tables 1 and 4, and this would detract comparatively little from the value of those tables for practical purposes. More important would be the effect upon severity data o f failure to secure time loss in each noncompensated accident when the latter are to be tabulated, because the committee’s plan proposes to measure severity in terms o f time loss. But even here there is an alternative for which much can be said. That would be to give each noncompen sated temporary disability a uniform weight in number of days, using for that purpose as close an estimated average as could be made. I f this seems like an arbitrary and inaccurate expedient, it can very positively be replied that it would be no more arbitrary, and probably less inaccurate, than data for time loss in compensated cases o f death and permanent disability computed according to the committee’s schedule of weighting in Appendix C, because the esti mated average to be used for noncompensated cases would be one necessarily within far closer-known limits (between one and six days in a State with one week of waiting time or between 1 and 12 days where there is two weeks waiting time) than those used for death and permanent disabilities. Furthermore, the estimate for noncom pensated cases would aggregate but a fraction of that to be used for deaths and permanent disabilities. However, since this is a proposal to alter substantially the recommended plan o f the committee on sta tistics, the suggestion to substitute a uniform weighting for non compensated accidents, as an alternative to determination o f exact time loss in such cases, should perhaps go first to that committee. NONCOM PENSAT.ED ACCID EN TS— L . W . H A T C H . 125 The answer to the question, “ Why tabulate noncompensated acci dents ? ” then, is that such tabulation is necessary to afford complete statistics of accident experience, but that their inclusion is not a mat ter o f first importance for most practical purposes of accident statis tics and should be held secondary in value to attainment of com plete and early statistics of compensated cases. It is frankly recog nized that this conclusion has been reached by an analysis largely on a priori grounds, and is submitted subject to further discussion on those grounds, or better still to verification by the more laborious method of test by available statistics. THE USE OF STANDARD ACCIDENT AND COMPENSATION TABLES. BY W. H . BUEHOP, SE CR ETA RY , W IS C O N S IN C O M P E N S A T IO N IN S U R A N C E BOARD, While the primary function o f this discussion is to illustrate the use of the standard accident and compensation tables recommended by the statistical committee of the International Association of In dustrial Accident Boards and Commissions, and to emphasize the practical yalue which these tabulations present to administrative bodies, it may not be too great a deviation to inject a brief resume pertaining to the development and maintaining o f the records which must form the foundation of the statistics involved. While the committee has recommended detailed classifications of causes of accidents, of industries, and of nature of injury, also stand ard definitions and even table forms, no recommendations have been made regarding the procedure or manner in which the original re ports find their way into the finished table. This, obviously, is an administrative question which presents a different problem in the various States. The industrial size of the State, the kind of acci dents reported, the manner of claim settlement, and the jurisdiction of the administrative body are some of the factors which will in fluence the statistical procedure. Furthermore, so far as uniformity is concerned, the details of procedure are unimportant; our aim is to erect certain tables in which the facts are based on standard, uni form definitions and classified uniformly according to adopted classi fication codes. The manner in which this is accomplished rests with the individual State. This discussion is not intended to present a model statistical plan, but merely to cite as an illustration the procedure employed by the Wisconsin Industrial Commission, and which was developed as the needs demanded and the budget permitted. Employers of Wisconsin report annually from 15,000 to 18,000 industrial compensable accidents, or accidents causing more than seven days’ disability. To enable a statistical department to com pile and arrange this number o f individual reports into table form, and do so with efficiency and accuracy compels the use of tabulating machinery. The safety department must have accident statistics to exercise properly its functions, and so the statistical department is continually called upon to compile statistics showing the accidents in certain industries, make comparisons for given periods, make 126 STANDARD A C C ID E N T , E T C ., TABLES— W . H . B U R H O P . 127 studies o f specific causes, and even to show the accident experience o f an individual employer over a period o f years. No hand method o f dealing with 50,000 injuries (the approximate number o f accidents in Wisconsin during the past three years) would enable a department to collate all this information and do so with the rapidity demanded. With the possible exception o f the smallest industrial States, each State would find this labor-saving machinery a well-paying invest ment, if not an absolute necessity to gather the information vital to the best administration o f safety and compensation laws. This feature is here mentioned because the plan under discussion is based upon the use o f machinery. Where an accident report is received record is at once made upon an individual claim card. On this card all facts necessary to the proper adjustment o f the claim are recorded. Space is available to indicate future payments and final settlement of the case as in dicated by supplementary and final reports. Until the claim is set tled the card is filed in a case containing all open claims, or claims in the course o f adjustment. This work is done by the claim depart ment, which is not a division o f the statistical department. When the claim department has made its original record of the injury, the report passes to the statistical department. The first function o f this department is to codify the information ; that is, to translate the various facts into code numbers. This interpreta tion o f the report is a highly important function and should not be intrusted to one without a thorough understanding of the classifica tions and a reasonable familiarity with industrial processes. Some of the information pertaining to the injury can be definitely determined from the first report, while such facts as the duration o f disability, the amount of compensation and medical aid, can not be ascertained until disability has ceased. In many instances even the ultimate nature o f the injury varies from that at first indicated. For these reasons the statistical department can not complete the card from the first report. Such items as the date o f the accident, industry class, the employer’s file number, the accident number, the age and wage o f the injured, the cause o f the accident, and the nature o f the injury are punched on the card from the first report, and then it is placed in an incomplete file arranged in order by file number. Periodically, weekly when possible, the claim department transfers to the statistical department all the claim cards o f those cases which were settled finally during the period. These cards also contain the employers file and accident number, so that the two record cards can be brought together. The accident card is then completed and placed in a different file ready for tabulation. All the accident statistics collated by the Industrial Commission are based upon closed cases, and injuries are charged to the period 128 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. in which the final payment was made. While this creates a slight error in a tabulation o f accidents for time periods, the practical ad vantage in thus handling the records is so great that the method seems justified. The only discrepancy involved is that in case o f a rapid rise in the number o f accidents, this rise would not be shown until several months later. If, on the contrary, all accidents were to be charged to the period in which they occurred, a final tabulation for a certain year could not be made, or at least would have to be corrected, for a period o f possibly 10 or 15 years. Having thus completed the record cards, the statistical department is able to tabulate desired information in a very short time. Spe cific illustrations o f information compiled for the use o f various departments o f the commission will be given later. The standard tables suggested and outlined by the committee do not present a complete exhibit o f accident statistics; they merely represent wThat the committee believes to be the most essential in formation, arranged so that the experience o f the States may be combined. Some jurisdictions may not yet be able to meet even these minimum recommendations, while others may desire more de tailed and varied tabulations. The tables compiled by the Wisconsin Industrial Commission dur ing the past three years are, in general, more detailed than the pro posals o f the committee. This, however, does not prevent the W is consin experience from being compared with tables formulated ex actly in accordance with the standard, because the details can easily be combined. Tables 1 and 3 o f the recommendations call for a distribution o f kinds of injury by industries, also for exposure rates and time loss due to various classes o f injuries. The permanent partial disabilities are grouped into one column. The Wisconsin commission prefers to itemize the permanent partial disabilities so that the number of disabilities to the various parts o f the body can be determined. Instead of grouping all such permanent disabilities into one column, they are actually divided into 21 columns, showing separately permanent disabilities to the arm above elbow, airm below elbow, hand, thumb, one finger, etc., in accordance with the list employed in the weighting system presented with the report o f the committee to the 1917 convention and found on page 142 o f the M o n t h l y R e v i e w of the United States Bureau o f Labor Sta tistics, issued in October, 1917. The commission has gone further than this and has indicated for each class of permanent injuries whether the member affected was amputated, or if not amputated, whether the disability was determined to be over or under 50 per cent allowed for amputation. STANDARD A C C ID E N T , E T C ., TABLES---- W . H . B U R H O P . 129 Instead o f making two separate tables to show the nature of the injury and the time loss, the commission has combined. Tables 1 and 3 o f the committee’s recommendations. The only difficulty encountered in attempting to fully meet the standard was found in determining accident rates. The commission does not have a record of the number o f employees in the various industry classifications, hence the rate per 1,000 full-time workers could not be determined. The only other measure of exposure is the pay roll. This must be secured from two sources, the insurance reports showing the audited pay roll by classes (Schedule Z) and the reports o f employers carrying their own risk by permission of the commission. A slight discrepancy will be found in this com bination o f pay roll because the insurance reports are on a year-ofissue basis, while the reports of self-insured are on a caleridar-year basis. The results, however, should be reasonably accurate. Only with the aid of a table such as above discussed can the relative hazard of industries be determined. The safety man is in need o f this information; and, with a broad exposure, an excellent check o f compensation insurance rates, which are also expressions o f relative hazard, is secured. From the viewpoint o f accident prevention, Table 4 of the recommendations is by far the most important. In this table the number and severity of accidents by causes is exhibited. As in the table previously discussed, the severity o f the injury is shown by groups. A ll permanent partial disabilities are added into one column. While the relative time loss due to the various causes, that is to say, the relative importance of the causes, is derived by apply ing the weighting scale to the nature o f the permanent injury, the Wisconsin commission believes that it is of additional value to show the permanent partial disabilities in detail. As in Table 1, therefore, the extent o f the disability and the part o f the body af fected is presented; also if the injury resulted in amputation, or, if not, then the degree o f disability. The argument is consistently made that the number o f accidents alone is no criterion o f the relative hazard o f the instrumentality producing the injury, but that the severity or gravity o f the injury as well must be known. While this viewpoint is not contradicted, the number o f accidents, especially for some causes, is quite as im portant to the safety man as is the severity o f the injury. The nature o f the injury is in a great many cases purely a matter of chance. A stamping press which “ repeats ” is just as much o f a danger if by repeating it amputates a worker’s finger, his hand, or if no injury occurs whatever. I f the workman’s entire hand had been under the 124247°— 19-------9 130 ST A TIST IC A L SESSION. die when the repeating occurred, the loss of the entire hand would have resulted. The fact that at that particular moment only his finger was exposed, or no injury resulted, is only a chance occurrence which does not minimize the hazard. The fact that a mason’s scaf fold is not properly guarded, and as a result a brick falling from it strikes a helper below a glancing blow on the arm causing a slight disability, presents just as serious a hazard as if a fatality had re sulted. It was only by chance that the brick did not strike the work man on the head and kill him. It is largely for this reason that the commission believes in a detailed exhibit o f causes of accidents as well as nature o f injury. A table giving such detail is the most im portant guide which statistics offer to accident prevention. To be o f maximum utility, however, the causes must be given in con siderable detail, and the mode o f prevention must be emphasized. It is not enough to know that an elevator fell, causing injury and death. The important thing to know is why the elevator fell. A different method of prevention exists for every different cause o f the elevator falling. Likewise, it is insufficient information to know that a scaffold fell, or that a workman fell from or with a ladder. These facts alone tell nothing regarding the prevention o f similar accidents. So far as possible a cause classification should show why the accident happened, or, if this can not be done, a subsidiary classi fication o f manner o f occurrence should be employed. Tabulations showing the manner o f occurrence have been employed by the Wisconsin Industrial Commission for several years, especially in making detailed studies o f particular causes. Such a presentation should exhibit the injuries caused because o f the wearing o f loose clothing, slippery or uneven floors, oiling or adjusting the machinery while in motion, breaking machine parts, and other contributing causes. Metal burns can be tabulated to show how many could have been prevented by the wearing of proper shoes and leggings; eye injuries due to grinding or chipping should be correlated with wearing or not wearing of goggles; and likewise there can be many other com parisons o f similar nature. This is the real information needed to conduct a safety campaign properly, and in no other branch o f accident statistics has the commission emphasized detail so much as in the causes o f accidents. The Wisconsin cause classification pre sents much greater detail than the committee code, but this can readily be combined so that comparability is not destroyed. Tables 5 to 13 o f the recommendation have been prepared by the commission for about five years. Table 5 presents the injuries by nature o f severity and compensation and medical cost. This table, with Tables 6 and 7, not only pictures the results and adequacy STANDARD A C C ID E N T , E T C ., TABLES-----W . H . B U R H O P . 131 o f the compensation act, but is an absolute necessity to determine accurately the effect in cost of new legislation. Legislatures will want to know such facts before they take action on bills offering changes, and insurance companies must have this information to increase or decrease their rates properly. With the aid o f these tables the Wisconsin commission has been able to determine for the legis lature the cost changes very accurately; as a matter o f fact, in the final draft o f the bill passed by the 1917 legislature, cost tables pre pared by the commission were employed as an important guide. The tables discussed are the most important recommended by the committee. This list, however, is far from exclusive, considering the entire field of useful accident statistics. Many special studies to throw light on particular problems can and should be made. Some o f these have been previously referred to. Important causes such as saws, emery wheels, stamping presses and the like are adapted to more detailed analysis, having in mind always why the accident occurred. For such studies the manner of occurrence classification is useful. A detailed exhibit o f the causes of accidents in the logging indus try has guided the commission and the logging operators in estab lishing a set of rules for the workmen. When an employer or a workman is told that a certain number o f men have been injured because they carried the saw or ax under their arms, a rule to always carry these tools on their shoulders carries a great deal more weight. Likewise orders and rules have been made for safety in the mining industry, based upon experience indicated by accident statistics. Square-headed jointers have been legally condemned because statis tics pictured their danger to the fingers and hands of workmen. The use o f goggles in certain occupations has been made compulsory be cause statistics displayed the danger to the unprotected eye. Ele vator orders have been made and increased in the light o f tabulated experience. Children have been prohibited from -working in certain industries and on certain machinery because the tabulated experi ence o f the past has indicated the hazard to be too great. Safety rules have been established in the building industry and were founded largely upon statistics. Using accident experience to still greater detail, exhibits are made to show in detail the record of the larger employers. Such a table is placed in the hands of the inspector prior to his visit to the re spective plant. With this information in hand he can be guided by former experience in making his inspection; he can also emphasize his arguments for safeguarding. Inspectors report this information to be o f great aid and value. 132 STA TIST IC A L SESSION. For large employers, accident frequency is the main gauge o f the effectiveness o f safety work. A current record o f the experience of individual employers should be kept. A rise in the frequency curve is an invitation for the State safety department to visit the plant. Maintaining proper accident statistics is the accounting system of safety work; it is just as necessary as a cost accounting system of our largest industrial enterprises. True, we can talk safety without facts, but it means groping in the dark, misdirected energy, and lacks the punch of certainty and definiteness which distinguishes serious and effective work from superficial propaganda. T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 26— M O R N I N G S E S S IO N . CH AIRM AN, CHARLES H. LEMON, M. D., M IL W A U K E E , W IS. IV. MEDICAL SESSION. SHOULD MEDICAL SERVICE BE LIMITED IN COMPENSATION CASES? BY CHAS. H . LEMON, M . D., MILWAUKEE, W IS. We know that in the past, prior to the establishment o f the work men’s compensation act, first-aid treatment was about all that the vast majority of injured workmen received at the hands o f their em-. ployer or the insurance carrier. Nobody cared very much whether this first aid was the best that could be had or where it was given. The employer in the large cities called an ambulance and the man was removed from the premises; usually he was taken to a city hos pital where routine treatment was given by internes, or young men on the staff, who were without experience. Medical service should be rendered to an injured employee, first, because it is humanitarian to do so, and educated public opinion de mands it; second, it should be rendered because it is important for industry that the man shall be returned to his employment with the least possible loss of working days. The steam railroads in the past were pioneers in the manner o f furnishing medical service to injured employees. We will not admit, however, that their action was entirely unselfish. The medical profes sion was subsidized by free passes, and with the exception of isolated cases in the large cities the free pass was about all that the average railroad surgeon got for his services. This practice established a low fee basis, and even the chief surgeons in the metropolitan cities were greatly underpaid for the work they did. There was an allur ing fetich in the title “ railroad surgeon.” W e must recognize as an entity what is known as educated public opinion, and any treatment on the part o f the employer which seems like indifference to the sufferings of our fellow men will result in a public remonstrance which can not go unheeded. The employer, therefore, should render medical service, not merely because the law requires him to do so, but because public opinion de mands it. 133 134 M ED ICAL SESSION. The character of the medical service to be rendered may well receive consideration at this time. It occurs to the writer that the best medi cal service that a community affords is none too good for an injured employee. The limitations that the most experienced surgeon must admit in the presence of a serious injury, particularly to the bony skeleton, should place a burden upon the employer not easily gotten rid of, and when I say employer I must include the insurance carrier; for but comparatively few of the large number o f firms in a commonwealth can afford to carry their own risk. The larger companies will endeavor to employ men of known experience, because experience has shown that where skillful first aid is given the ulti mate cost of the accident is reduced to the minimum and the injured employee will suffer less permanent disability. Some o f the largest institutions, however, are endeavoring to cut the cost for medical service either by the employment o f full-time men, who are usually without any personal experience excepting such as they have re ceived as internes in metropolitan hospitals, or who are without any experience at all, and accept the position because tlje salary offered gives them a certain livelihood. The medical man o f large experience will seldom be found outside o f the metropolitan cities. No criticism therefore should be made o f plants of moderate size remote from the larger cities, which must employ the surgical talent that is available in their communities. It is unfortunately true that doctors as a class are self-opinionated and with few exceptions are entirely satisfied with their own work. In their opinion, results which are far from what might have been at tained are due to “ complications,” and this diagnosis covers a multi tude of sins. We occasionally find a doctor living in a community remote from the larger cities who recognizes his own limitations and seeks advice from those of larger experience. Criticism, however, is to be directed to the character o f the medi cal service offered by some insurance carriers, who are seeking to take advantage of the cupidity o f the medical profession by em ploying so-called surgeons for the treatment o f injured employees, whose one reason for employment is that their fees are low. It is my observation that some o f the insurance carriers are hoping to educate some of these men at their own expense in the hope that in time they will become competent. It is my opinion that no man is justified in doing major emergency surgery who has not had a training in this class o f surgical work under a competent surgeon. The experience of the insurance carriers is sufficiently large at this time to have taught most of them that competent surgical service is the most economical, and in the larger cities they are employing a group o f men who have specialized in this class of work. For M il L IM IT A T IO N OF M ED ICAL SERVICE-----C. H . L E M O N , M . D . 135 waukee, I will say that the men who represent the insurance com panies are doing excellent work, and without exception they are men who have had not only excellent hospital experience prior to their entrance upon the field of surgery, but they counsel with each other when cases of unusual character present themselves. Without making a personal investigation into the individual cases that I have in mind, I would infer that the services rendered are satisfactory both to the injured employee and to the insurance carriers. Employ ment by large corporations and by insurance carriers o f trained nurses for the routine minor injury is a practice to be commended, because it is both economical and encourages the injured workman with the small infection to seek aid ready at hand. Legal gentlemen representing the insurance carriers have told me that the difficulty with the medical profession is, it makes the after treatment so expensive by what seems to be unnecessary repetition o f dressings, that the medical profession has biought itself into disrepute, and has forced the insurance carriers to seek other means o f avoiding what appears to be an excessive charge-for the subse quent treatment o f the cases. It would seem that prudence on the part of the medical profession would prompt a careful revision o f the subsequent dressing problem, so that it would not become a burden to the insurance carrier. Medical service that is not continuous has never been popular with the medical profession. In the personal relation, which is so frequently established between the doctor and patient, it has always been a difficult matter for a physician either to discharge a patient or to be dismissed by him. Any plan of medical service which does not give the physician an abundance o f time to cure the patient will be at once unpopular with the great body of the profession. Emergency surgery in the past has found few who were willing to give the large amount of time necessary to the first treatment, because the day following, in a large number of instances, the cases passed out o f their hands. The cases were referred to the interne in the metropolitan hospital and were prized by him because he had an opportunity to demonstrate his personal ability. The interne had no personal interest in the result to be attained and he certainly had no responsibility; and experience shows that the victim paid dearly for the experience he furnished to the young surgeon. I f medical service is to be limited, no first-class surgeon could be induced to undertake it. The large number of major accidents occurring in industries cause injury to the bony skeleton. These in juries are notoriously slow in recovering. There are so many factors which enter into the problem o f repair o f fractures o f bone, both simple and compound, that few, even among the most experienced, are able even to approximate the period that will be necessary for 136 M E D IC A L SESSION. complete recovery. There are also many accidents which occur dur ing operations, beyond the control o f the surgeon, arising out o f the use o f materials commercially made and handed to the surgeon at the operating table, which cause infection and complicate an other wise clean case, requiring many months to effect a cure. I recently had a case o f osteomyelitis follow an operation for de~ layed union that was caused by the use o f kangaroo tendon; the osteomyelitis occurring in the drill hole in the bone made for the kangaroo tendon; others have had similar experiences. I f surgery were like carpenter work we could always give a definite prognosis as to the period o f recovery. The complications caused by injury to the soft parts, such as the destruction ..of the nerves, throm bosis o f the blood vessels, laceration of the muscle and fascia tissue, frequently can not be foreseen and are not infrequently entirely over looked when obscured by some other serious injury which must be given priority o f treatment no matter what happens elsewhere in the body. Many times injuries occur which are not attended by danger to life j but which require long periods o f treatment before recovery ensues. I cite for an example the‘matter o f extensive burns o f the chest, the back, and the extremities. Not only, in these cases, must these pri mary lesions be healed, but frequently extensive operations must subsequently be performed to neutralize the effect o f the contracture o f scar tissue. We are all familiar with infections arising from very slight wounds of the fingers which require months to effect a healing. In the hands o f the experienced the time will be shorter for the heal ing period, but frequently when first seen, so much destruction has occurred and such important structures have become involved, that, even with the most skillful attention, many months elapse before the man is able to return to his work, and then with a seriously deformed hand. Injured employees are not willing to part with even small por tions o f their fingers in order to shorten the period o f convalescence. Many crushing injuries involving the pulp at the extremities o f the fingers, with no injury to the bony portion o f the finger, require from six to ten weeks to heal by granulation. The amount o f tis sue that is built up is oftentimes amazing and unless much scar tis sue forms, the resulting wound is infinitely better than any ampu tation stump. I f we were permitted to make amputations freely in such injuries to the hand, a two-weeks period in the larger number o f cases would be all that is required. As surgeons, we must conserve that which can be saved and in the treatment of the cases we must ignore any question o f expense to the employer or the insurance carrier when such question o f ex L IM IT A T IO N OF M ED ICAL SERVICE---- C. H . L E M O N , M . D . 137 pense involves the loss of any useful portion that remains of an injured member. No surgeon having regard for his reputation would be willing to reduce a fracture, place the same in a plaster cast where possible to do so, and then resign the case to another surgeon for subsequent treatment. It leaves too great a loophole for the shifting of respon sibility as to the ultimate result of the case. Injuries to the bony skeleton, particularly those involving the spine, the pelvis, and the upper portion o f the thigh bone, recover slowly, and can not be treated within a time-limit period. No sur geon should be asked to treat, without compensation, a patient after a time period has expired. This practice in time would lead to ai multiplication of fees for the period prior to the expiration of the time limit and this practice is essentially dishonest. There are cases which are hopeless from the beginning and these cases obviously should not be treated excepting on a permanent, com-, plete disability basis, excepting for a brief period subsequent to the reception o f the injury, which would enable the attending surgeon to have a competent consultation to assist him in arriving at such a decision. These cases, o f course, require prolonged hospital treatment, but the provision of the law should be such that this factor would be taken care o f in the amount set aside for the permanent total dis ability. The time will probably never come when either the employer or the insurance carrier will fully appreciate the fact that the primary treatment o f an injury is the most important factor that they have to deal with. The period necessary for healing must be measured by the thoroughness o f the primary surgical treatment that follows the accident. More can be done by a competent surgeon, experienced in the treatment o f emergency surgery, in the few hours following the accident, than the most skillful surgeon in the world can accomplish in the week following. The prevention of infections in compound wounds o f the joints and in compound fractures of the bones is a possibility that has been frequently demonstrated; but in actual prac tice it is seldom effected because of a lack of skill on the part of those who, for the greater part, are treating these wounds. The war surgery o f four years has developed the fact that extensive lacer ated and contused wounds can be cleaned by the removal o f the injured areas with the scissors or the knife and that these wounds heal frequently by primary intention because o f a vigorous blood supply that is capable of destroying infection that is not massive in quantity. This fact has been known to the railroad surgeons for many years and many cases could be cited to prove the fact. 138 M ED ICAL SESSION. It would seem the part o f prudence to employ, therefore, men ex perienced in this specialized class of surgery, rather than to pick up the first man who happened on the job, because, in your excitement, you thought the unconscious man was in danger o f dying and your sense o f responsibility became lessened when a medical man o f even the most limited attainments made his appearance upon the scene. Is it not a fact with almost no exceptions that nothing is ever done by the surgeon called to the scene o f an accident other than what a bystander could do, that in any way determined the question o f life or death, until the patient had been placed in a hospital, where apparatus and materials are at hand to provide the proper surgical treatment? I would not be understood to say that’ a surgeon should not go to the scene of accident; an important artery might be severed which, without prompt attention, would cause death; or the patient might be electrocuted, and those present might be without skill in the matter of resuscitation; or there might be severe pain which would necessarily need a measure o f relief prior to the suf ferer’s transfer in an ambulance. It is the factor of uncertainty which strikes terror to the heart of the lay person and which so fre quently brings to the injured physicians who are without the neces sary special training. Once in charge o f the case, they are loath to give it up. The provision o f the statute which gives the employer the right to call surgeons o f his selection is the saving clause which has insured to workmen competent medical attendance. The em ployer will usually give to his men the best medical service the com munity affords, and experience has shown this to be the rule. The medical man, therefore, should not be handicapped by a time limit. He should give the best that he is capable of to the injured man, with the sole idea of lessening the period that1the worker is taken from his daily labor. He should be permitted to make as many operations as are necessary and in reason to accomplish this result. These oper ations obviously can not be too close together, and I speak from ex perience when I say that the intelligent cooperation of the patient in recognizing the necessity for subsequent operations and submitting to them for his own good has been the most comforting experience of my own personal- professional career. To hesitate to operate a sec ond time, or the third time, to correct something which at the time o f the first operation was impossible to foresee, is to confess weak ness and lack o f ability to meet a definite situation. As surgery is an art and not a trade and as the surgeon is at the mercy of the idiosyncrasies o f his patient, there must, in the experience of all, come cases which bring disappointment and which require further ad justment; but they should not bring discouragement to the surgeon nor to the patient*. L IM IT A T IO N OF M ED ICAL SERVICE---- C. H . L E M O N , M . D . 139 In short, the emergency surgeon should be given every facility as to place, time, and assistance that will enable him, with a free hand, to do for an injured employee that which would be impossible under any other condition, not limiting him, either as to the expense to be incurred or the time to be consumed for the accomplishment of this humane object. I may epitomize all that I have written by quoting the words o f Mr. F. M. Wilcox o f the Wisconsin Industrial Commission in a per sonal communication on this matter: “ Unlimited medical service should be provided. The relatively liberal provisions of the Wisconsin act in this respect have insured to injured men a much higher quality o f medical attention than they ever had under the common law system or than they will ever get under any compensation system which only makes a very meager allowance, such as we have in some of the States. It is hard to measure in dollars and cents the value o f proper medical treatment. I f the injured man is left to select his own attendance his first thought is to get it as cheaply as possible. Rarely would they get hospital attendance, whereas, under the Wisconsin system, it is an unusual thing for a man with any major injury to be denied it.” BETTER TREATMENT FOR INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT CASES. BY MAJ. P. B. M AGNUSON, O F FIC E OF THE SURGEON GENERAL, WAR DEPARTM ENT, W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Gentlemen: You have all had plenty of experience with doctors, and most laymen look at doctors as M. D.’s and all M. D.’s are doc tors and all doctors are the same. I think the industrial commis sions have changed their minds about doctors. They have had ex perience— we have all had experience— with the young man who has just come out o f college into industry. I don’t know how much the layman is expected to know about the different classifications o f the medical schools in this country. We have a number o f classifications under the American Medical Asso ciation, the A-plus school— standing the highest—and the A, B-plus and the B, and these are rated according to their faculty, their equip ment, their clinical facilities. Now, it makes a good deal o f differ ence to a man in his education as to what sort of contact he has had during his student days— in the formative period. A man who has gone to one o f the schools that we have in Chicago, which we call the “ mill ” and which the State board o f licensers has been trying to put out o f business for a good while, is not apt to have very high ideals when he comes out o f school. He gets a job, usually, as a night sur geon at some large plant to help himself through school and when he comes out, instead o f taking an interneship, he goes right into industrial work nine times out o f ten. W hy does he go into indus trial work? Principally because, to the average corporation, the doc tor is a doctor. The president o f that corporation wouldn’t take that man on as his own family physician, but it never occurs to him that a cheap doctor is an expensive proposition. I would like to tell something that happened to me when I first went into industrial work. I had been with Dr. Murphy for several years as his assistant, and, upon his advice, went over to the stock yards— along Halstead Street—to get a little more experience. I went in to see the president o f one o f the large corporations over there and asked him if he didn’t want a doctor. “ No,” he said,“ We have got one doctor; we don’t need any more.” I said, “ How much do you pay him ?” He said, “ I don’t know, but I will find out,” so he called up the claim agent. They were paying the doctor $75 a month. They were being cheated, I think. 140 BETTER MEDICAL, T R E A T M E N T ---- M A J . P . B. MAGNTJSON. 141 He said, “ What do you want to do it fo r?” I said, “ I want to do it on a fee basis.” He said, 46How much will that cost?” I said, “ It will cost you $2 for the first office visit and $1 for every other one after that; $3 for the first call, and $2 for every one, after that.” He said, “ That will run over $75 a month.” I said, “ I hope so, or I don’t want the job.” After thinking it over—I had quite a conversation with him—I asked him if he knew anything about his doctor. I said, “ Where did he graduate from ?” He said, “ I don’t know.” “ What experience did he have before he came to you?” “ I don’t know.” I said, “ Do you know who he is?” “ W ell,” he said, “ I know his name is so and so.” “ W ell,” I said, “ Do you think it would save you any money if you had surgical treatment which was a little better than you are getting now ? ” He said, “ I don’t know ; but I am willing to gamble with you. I will pay you on a fee basis, and I will let the other fellow stay here and pay him a salary, and the fellow that has the most business at the end o f three months I will let have the job.” He added, “ You are starting out with a handicap, because the boys know this other fellow and they don’t know you.” I said, “ Maybe that is no handicap; that may be an advantage.” So we went to it. At. the end of 3 months I am glad to say I had about 80 per cent of the business. A t the end of 6 months the bill for that one company, on a fee basis, totaled six hundred and some dollars—that same work the other fellow was doing for $75. I sent the bill to the claim agent; he refused to O. K. it. He sent it to the general manager and he refused to O. K. it. He sent it up to the president. The president wrote me a letter and told me that if I didn’t cut that bill down he was going to get another doctor. It wasn’t very cheerful news for me, because I just had a new boy in the family and I wanted to send him through college some day, and I had very little other business besides that railroad business. But the president of the company was Irish and I knew he had to get about so much out of his system before I could talk to him, so I went over and let him get it out on me. Finally he ended up by saying he wasn’t going to pay that bill and wouldn’t stand for it. I said, “ Mr. Fitzgerald, you may never pay me another bill, but you are going to pay that one all right. I f the chairman o f the 142 M ED ICAL SESSION. board o f directors came along here and said, *Mr. Fitzgerald, we don’t think you earned your money last month and we are going to let you go at' the end o f this month, and we are not going to pay you last month’s salary,’ I suppose you are the man that would sit down and say, ‘ That suits me.’ You would tear the roof off the house and get your money, and that is just the way I feel about it.” He said, “ Young fellow, if you have got anything like that to say to me you go home and write it.” I went home and wrote him a nice letter. I told him I wasn’t the man he wanted if he wanted arms and legs cut off when there was some chance o f saving them. I f he wanted fingers cut off when there was some chance o f doing tendon sutures, nerve grafts, and tendon transplantation I wanted him to get another man, because my reputation was worth more to me than his money was; that dressings cost money; that careful treatment cost money, but it saved money. He sent me a draft in three days. At the end o f the year this was the record: W e had had almost 10 per cent more accidents than we had had the year before; we had had only one lawsuit filed as against thirty-one the year before. There was a total saving of $20,000 in the claim department, and the surgical department expense had been boosted almost $900. Now, I am not telling that as recommending myself to you gentle men, because the Surgeon General is employing me now, and I don’t need any outside jobs, but it does show, not only what careful medi cal treatment and surgical treatment will do, but what the treatment o f employees will do. We put those men in private rooms and gave them a night and a day nurse if they were very sick. We gave them everything that money could buy to further their treatment. We didn’t keep them in luxury, but we gave them everything that a man who can pay for the best gets, and the results saved the money. Now, that all leads up to the fact that the training o f a surgeon should be brought to the attention of the employer as much as the training o f his general manager. He should look into the training o f the surgeon that he employs and the man’s character as carefully as he does the general manager’s, because it pays in dollars and cents, and if we are going to talk to a corporation head, we have got to talk in dollars and cents and not in medical ethics, because he isn’t interested in medical ethics; he is interested in dollars and cents saving at the end o f the year. He thinks it is saving to have a contract surgeon. Now, there are a good many good men who do work on a salary basis, but most o f them will not do it—that is, especially in the large cities where they have a large outside practice. There are a great many good men who have started as contract surgeons, simply as a stepping stone to work up, but those men leave it, because they can’t get ade quate compensation for their work from the corporation. The con BE TTER M E D IC A L T R E A T M E N T — M A J . P . B. M A G N U S 0 N . 143 tract surgeon, therefore, has fallen into disrepute, because, on an average, he doesn’t measure up to men in civil practice who are doing the best kind o f surgery. We have all got to look out for our own welfare, and if we can make more money doing private practice, we are going to do that, in preference to contract practice. The con tract surgeon is often careless; he gets a biased view. The claim agent bothers the life out o f him to get a man back to work. He sees a few men whom he can’t find anything the matter w ith; I think we have all had experience with that class. Two classes come in that are in absolute disparity to each other. One man says there is noth ing the matter with him; the other will come in and say there is something the matter with him, and he will bring medical testimony to substantiate it. On one railroad we have adopted this policy. W e have a great many men who exaggerate their symptoms, but not because they are dishonest, because most men are not dishonest. In ten years o f practice, a large part o f the time dealing with corporations and their employees, I have found only one man that I thought was an actual malingerer. I have found a good many that exaggerated their symptoms, not because they were dishonest, but because, when a man is injured, he stays around and thinks about his trouble, and he exaggerates his pain because he has nothing else to think about. He has a sore joint and it hurts him when he concentrates on it. These people come into the office and they are inclined to be disgruntled with the company surgeon, anyhow. I call these men off, after I have made a careful examination, and say,“ John, I don’t think there is half as much the matter with you as you think there is, and I am willing to gamble with you on the subject. I will give you the name o f five or ten men in Chicago, men of unimpeachable reputation. I won’t address the letter. I will leave the heading blank and say, ‘ Dear Doctor: This will introduce to you John Smith, who is a patient of mine. I would like to have your opinion upon his condition and will guarantee any fee that you see fit to charge for a thorough examination. W ill you please mail the report to me, or hand it to Mr. Smith to bring to me.’ ” John Smith takes this letter. I f he isn’t satisfied with one man, I say to him, “ Now, if this man savs there is nothing the matter with you, will you agree to go back to work? I f he says there is something the matter with you, I will agree to pay the bill,” The company gives me the privilege of spend ing all the money on outside doctors that I see fit. I f the man is a malingerer he knows his bluff is called; he can’t get out of that; that is a perfectly fair proposition that he can’t side-step. Eight out o f ten men will say, “ Well, doctor, if you think there isn’t anything the matter with me I will go back and try it.” The other two will go to the man, who is a reputable man, and have their examination and 144 M E D IC A L SESSION. be convinced, and will go back and try it, and I am proud to say that, in almost ten years connection with two railroads, I have only been on the witness stand three times, and two of those times were on account of passengers— only one with employees. That sort of treat ment counts, as far as money is concerned, and money is the only thing, as I say, that counts with the corporation. Until you can get them interested in their men, you have got to hit them through their pocketbooks first, and through their sentiments second. The weighing of medical testimony as it comes before the indus trial board from the men who have examined a case and had it under observation is sometimes a rather difficult thing. We haven’t had exactly the experience o f the Wisconsin Commission, maybe because Chicago abounds in men who will testify to anything, prob ably; we have had some bad medical situations in Chicago that we have tried to get rid of. Nevertheless, we have had to deal with men who would come in before the insurance companies or the em ployers and say that a man was able to go back to work, and just as many men come in for the employee and say that he was disabled for life— an absolute divergence of opinion. You can’t expect a layman to weigh that medical testimony that involves a lot o f medical terms, and sometimes a man’s own ignorance is clothed in many highsounding medical terms that mean nothing much to him and much less to the layman. I f you can put that testimony before a man who is impartial, he can eliminate the wheat from the chaff and give the commission some sort of an idea o f what the facts are in the case. We have tried, in Illinois, to put ourselves in a position so that the employers and employees would have enough confidence in the medical department and the industrial commission to eliminate all expert testimony; to send their case to the commission and say, “ You tell us how much this thing is worth in dollars and cents.” Here is where the commission has the whip hand over the employer and employee. Many cases are sent in to us where the treatment is not complete. A man may have had an injury to his forearm; he has a limitation of motion in the joint and the elbow and wrist. Maybe he has had a splint clear down to the end of his fingers. That all constitutes part o f the injury and a part o f the disability. I f the • employer has employed a doctor who knows no better than to leave a man in a splint from his shoulder to his fingers without taking it off or giving any chance for the joint to move, then the employer should be penalized for employing that sort of physician. They have sent that case to the commission for settlement before the case is complete. The commission has a right to send that case back. W hy ? Treatment is not complete. The best result has not been ob tained and we make the employer continue paying compensation until that treatment is complete. Now, in many cases, you will find BETTER M ED ICAL T R E A T M E N T — M A J . P . B. M A G N U S O N . 145 that the employer will say, “ We don’t know what to do with this case. Our doctors say that the treatment is complete,” and then we say to them, “ Well, we advise you to get some doctors who know more.” With constant repeating of that sort o f performance, the employers and the insurance companies are gradually coming to the conclusion that it is a bad practice to send a case in before the treat ment is complete and the best result attained, because they simply make it cost themselves a lot more than it otherwise would. Now, in the hopes o f getting some line on them, when I. went down to the surgeon general’s office a year ago, we started to ask various commissions and various employers what became o f their serious accident and o f their permanent disability cases; how medical treat ment' was furnished and what wjere the results. We couldn’t get any information otherwise, as the statistics in this country are worth very little. We would like to be able to talk in dollars and cents to the employer, and to show him the difference saved in compensation by the supplying o f expert surgical treatment and poor surgical treat ment ; and, to that end, I have here a rough surgical report to be filled in by the commission on every case, in order to trace our accident cases down and find out what the dollars and cents saving is per case in certain classes of injuries. The thing reads like this: Loca tion of injury—head, arm, etc.; nature of injury— fracture, sprain, etc.; extent and degree o f disability, in per cent, functional and occupational. Now, a man may have a functional disability o f 50 per cent; for instance, if he has had a fracture of the forearm and he has 50 per cent o f motion in that forearm in this direction (indicating), he has a 50-per cent functional disability, so to speak, because he has half his rotation; but supposing he is working at a job where he has to have his hand in this position (indicating), he hasn’t that 50 per cent that he needs, so his occupational disability is considerably more than 50 per cent. It makes a lot of difference in a man’s earning capacity. “ What kind o f medical treatment was administered—washing, salve, dressing, iodine, etc.—to give us an idea o f what the man got immediately after he was hurt ? How soon was this applied after the accident? How many days, weeks, or months under treatment? By whom furnished— employer, insurer, or employee ? ” Those questions are asked with the idea o f giving us some information. For instance, we have an infection o f the hand. We can average the infections of the hand; extent of disability; what length of disability they were; what the percentage of dis ability was after the injury, and how long the treatment lasted. a Qualifications o f doctor in attendance; age, school, number o f years in practice; special training; interneship; assistant to surgeons, etc.” I f we get that information we can say to a company, “ Last year 124247°— 19------ 10 146 M ED ICAL SESSION. cases treated by men who rate as class A - l men cost in compensation $350 for certain classes o f injuries, on an average. Cases treated by class B men cost $850 per case. The medical treatment paid for class A men cost $75 more per case than the medical treatment paid class B men. Therefore, you have a saving o f $400 or $500 per case.” That is the only way, I believe, we are ever going to be able to talk to these m en; and the only way we can get valuable statistics on the value o f decent medical treatment is by every commission in this country following up their cases in this way. Now, at the bottom o f this slip we have a paragraph which takes up the vocational phases o f permanent disability or permanent par tial disability; previous occupation of injured employee; number of years employed at that occupation; previous vocation and training o f employee; is patient able to return to his former occupation; could patient be taught new trade if supplied with opportunity; would employer find a new job for him or teach him a new one at liis own plant; attitude of employee— would he take a new job if he got it; would he undergo training for a new job? That means that the States will have to do in the future what the Army is planning to do for its crippled soldiers. Because a man has lost two legs is no reason why he should be a pauper the rest o f his life and dependent upon St'ate charity. The States of this country have got to furnish for their crippled industrial in dividuals just what the Army is going to furnish the crippled soldier, because it costs every State a large amount o f money every year to keep and support the injured man who is out o f employment, not because that man isn’t capable o f doing anything, but because that man isn’t capable of learning a new trade without some incentive. There is a bill before Congress now— House bill No. 12880—which provides for the promotion o f vocational rehabilitation o f persons disabled in industry and otherwise, and for their return to safe em ployment. That is a plan that contemplates that the Government will pay dollar for dollar—for every dollar that the State invests in voca tional reeducation of industrial accidents the Government will put a dollar to it for that purpose, and the vocational board in Wash ington will have charge o f that work. We have a plan in Illinois to put the whole regime in a State hospital. I haven’t time to explain that, because I have run over my time now. It is an idealistic plan, maybe, but it has got to come, because we have got to supply decent medical and surgical treat ment for the industrial cripple as well as for the Army cripple. I f we don’t we are going to be swamped in this country with our mil lion accidents a year. S U R G IC A L T R E A T M E N T T O P R E V E N T A N D M IN IM IZ E P E R M A N E N T D IS A B IL IT IE S . BY F R A N C IS D. D O N O G H U E , M . D ., M E D IC A L A D V IS E R , IN D U S T R IA L A C C ID E N T BOARD OF M ASSACH USETTS. A study made by my friend, Carl Hookstadt, under the direction o f the Department o f Labor (“ What Becomes of Men in Industry,” M o n t h l y L a b o r R e v i e w , July, 1918), emphasizes the facts that proper surgical treatment could prevent and minimize permanent disabilities and that it is inseparably connected with adequate super vising authority and responsible direction of the injured man as a man. Our thanks should be due to the Hon. William B. Wilson, Secre tary o f Labor, who, through Dr. Royal Meeker, has made possible this timely contribution to our knowledge of end results. Compensation laws have now been in existence in this country for six or seven years and a large mass of experience must teach us many lessons if we have time to take stock. Six years of experience in the administration of workmen’s compensation laws must be thoroughly convincing to everyone who has had to do with them that the best kind of medical treatment is the cheapest. This point can not admit of argument. Getting the treatment to the man or getting the man to the treat ment is a thing over which the industrial accident boards do not have sufficient control. In my own State the treatment is given under the direction o f 24 insurance companies, each handling the case in its own particular way, the accident board acting only when bad results have occurred or good results have not been obtained. In general terms, the speed with which employees may be re turned to work in surgical cases will depend upon the men and the system under which such cases are handled. Cases should not be sent to institutions which lack the methods o f making proper diag noses or which lack the surgeons qualified to render the particular treatment; and the accident boards should have the power to regu late the institutions to which these cases are sent. The system which obtains in Massachusetts of sending cases to the open ward o f hospitals endowed or maintained for charitable purposes is not a good one, and the treatment of industrial cases in hospital out-patient departments should not be permitted unless special arrangements are made so that a properly qualified surgeon shall actually carry out the treatment. T o quote you cases to show how men suffer from inadequate medi cal and hospital services would be to repeat in more or less detail 147 148 M ED ICAL SESSION. all I have said since I became medical adviser of the Massachusetts Industrial Accident Board. As the cases that come to our board are those showing poor results, our viewpoint is apt to be distorted because we do not see the thou sands of cases in which adequate service has been rendered, so that the men have been properly restored economically. Adequate surgical treatment to prevent and minimize permanent disabilities is the same kind of treatment which will minimize the loss resulting from the less serious forms o f injuries. The perma nent disabilities represented by the amputation of an arm or a leg or by the loss of an eye are evident and occupy attention out o f proportion to their relative value in industrial injuries. Less intrusive upon the eye of a claim adjuster and making a less insistent appeal to the administrators of the compensation acts are injuries to the hand. Rather than discuss in abstract terms, as I think I have before, the whole surgical field, I am going to take up briefly one group o f cases and endeavor to focus your attention upon them. These are cases of injuries to the hand. My interest has been stimulated by the successful work of Dr* William E. Browne, o f Boston, who has in some cases acted as an impartial examiner for the Industrial Accident Board. Do we fully realize the value o f the full capacity o f the hand? Injuries to the hand vary in severity from simple contractures to hands which are clawlike in appearance. The two great causes which result in these deformities are first, sepsis, and secondly, fractures. A great many cases of sepsis occur as the result of too many sutures placed too tightly in some small skin wound. These cases are found most frequently in large relief stations, where, young, conscientious, but over-enthusiastic internes strive assiduously for a fine-looking wound. It may seem strange, but nevertheless it is a fact, that out o f a very large series of crippled hands a large percentage of them was attributable to faulty application o f sutures. Nearly all the skin wounds with which one meets in industrial accidents may be attended to by careful application of perforated adhesive plaster with a sterile dressing and, most important, a splint. On the whole, these cases do better with dry dressings, probably because the subcuticular tissues are made better culture media as a result of long-continued and frequent soaking in various solutions. It has been my expe rience that, when it is possible, it is best to apply water running from a faucet, both hot and cold, and then to squeeze out the water from the dressing and cover it with a Turkish towel. A poorly set, a nonrecognized, or a slipped fracture o f a meta carpal bone will cause a greater period of disability than a poorly SU RG ICAL T R E A T M E N T -----FRA N CIS D. DONOGHTJE, M . D. 149 treated Colle’s fracture. The average length of disability from an impacted fracture of the lower end of the radius is six to eight weeks. W hy? Because the lower end of the radius is almost a fixed object, and an ordinary flannel bandage will serve at times to give a man a fairly good wrist. This is very well proven by the fact that many men treated with liniment and a flannel bandage for supposed sprain o f the wrist get back to work in six to eight weeks’ time, although they really had Colle’s fracture. On the other hand, the metacarpal bone is a long curved bone with about the same curve in it that we find in the normal femur. On the flexor surface o f this bone we find three tendons; on the dorsal surface, one tendon; t’o these groups of tendons the lumbarical muscles are attached; and lastly the interossei muscles are attached to the metacarpal bone, so that in the palm of the hand there is a complex anatomical situation with its basic principle the metacarpal bone. I f the metacarpal bone is improperly set, or not set at all, it throws out of normal wTorking order seven muscles, which in turn cause the other muscles o f the hand to remain quiet, in order to avoid pain; and here, with reference to fractures of the metacarpal bone, is the starting point of many crippled hands which require serious and skilled operative interference in order to prevent them becoming permanent disabili ties. In the fingers themselves, where compound fractures o f the phalanges or simple fractures in poor position are found, interference with the action of the flexor or extensor tendons may result, causing a long-continued disability and, not infrequently, resulting in ampu tation. It has been my experience that removal through careful dis section of the smaller fragment of a fractured phalange (when in poor nonworking condition) gives the man a working hand much better than any other way. This removal of pieces of fractured phalange must be done without any injury whatsoever to the synovial sheath of the flexor tendon. There are many rules which one might lay down with reference to the treatment of fractures o f the small bones o f the hand. But in the treatment of these fractures the one greatest thing to bear in mind is that these bones serve as levers for the movement o f the tendons, and that interference with the plane of the bone will cause interference with the movement o f the tendons. The greater the disturbance o f the bone the greater the disturbance in the tendon; the greater the amount o f pain in the hand the longer the man’s period o f disability. With reference to the soft tissues as a whole in the forearm and hand it is difficult to say a great deal or to say anything which will mean very much to anybody. For example, if a man has pain in the index finger o f his right hand can that pain be due to abnormal position o f structures in the little finger o f the hand ? I f a man has 150 M E D IC A L SESSION. flexor and extensor tendons, which in themselves are all right, why should he not have normal flexion and extension in the distal pha langes o f his fingers? This brings up the lumbarical muscles ques tion. A man with a thumb and an index and a little finger can do almost as much with such a hand as a man with all fingers present. When tendons have sloughed in the palm o f the hand they may be very well replaced by facia lata and good results may be obtained, but in order to get a good result it is necessary to make a quick and careful dissection o f the parts into which the graft is to be placed: and if' you place a graft in a finger in an anatomically correct posi tion, making allowances for the movements of the finger and for the amount of contracture in the graft you put in, you will restore the greater percentage o f crippled fingers. Every man is not qualified to operate upon the hand. Surgeons o f great experience in abdominal and chest operations or in the treatment o f fractures are flat failures when it comes to doing plastic operations upon the hand. These cases are so important that they demand men who are fully qualified in the surgery o f the hand itself. * The treatment of the hand is not an orthopedic proposition in the sense that orthopedic surgeons alone should be allowed to treat it. It is a capital problem in major industrial surgery. I would like to say one word here of the tendency o f the orthope dist, w ho is really a mechanician, to invade the surgical field by means o f operations. Orthopedic surgery is still in a state o f transition, and perhaps general surgery itself is in a period of transition, many gen eral surgeons coming to know that they are incapable o f carrying out long-continued mechanical treatment; on the other hand, the surgical training of the orthopedist is as a rule deficient and their surgical sense is o f late development. They have not had experi ence in surgical clinics and have not been called upon to treat acute surgical emergencies, the results of which have afterwards drifted into their hands. It almost may be said that they lack general surgi cal diagnostic ability, although extremely keen to sense mechanical conditions that a general surgeon constantly overlooks. Orthopedic surgeons as a rule have drifted into surgery through the chronic channel, and we should utilize them only in such cases as they have proven their ability to handle properly. The orthope dist has taught the general surgeon much by his perseverance and patience in the nonspectacular problems o f neglected surgical cases. Orthopedic surgery during the war has developed wonderfully. Its scope has been materially enlarged and from its vast experience great good may be obtained for our industrial cripples. Cases should be held under such control that all instructions o f the surgeon can be made effective, and when the period o f active treatment is over, i f the employee does not at once return to work* SU RG ICAL T R E A T M E N T — FR A N C IS D. D O X O G H U E , M . D. 151 there should be a follow-up system to persuade the employee to return. Right here let me say that one of the greatest factors in prolonging disability is in preparing the mind o f the injured workman for his first plunge back into industry. A fter a severe injury, if the man goes back to work for one day in a week and is given his compensation for the full week without deduction, and the second week he goes back for two days or three days, finally, at the end o f the third or fourth week, he will have reacquired confidence in his own capacity. Serious injury undoubtedly shakes a man’s confidence in his ability to do work until he again finds himself. The longer he is allowed to drift the longer he remains unemployed, the longer he remains away from treatment that will restore him, the further he falls in the economic scale; and as he falls in the economic scale his sense o f uncompensated injury may become a fixed idea, so that in addition to the difficulty in remedying a mechanical condition we have to deal with a mental condition no less trying. The conception o f work which most men advised to return to work have is based on previous experience, and they should not be made to feel that they are being forced back to work before they are able to work. To advise a non-English-speaking laborer, whose only occu pation has been the labor o f the pick and shovel, to take up light work at reduced compensation is absurd. Something more is needed than turning the employee loose with the advice that he should find some light work. He has been working under the watchful eye o f the boss, and his idea o f work is to keep up with his fellow workmen and pro duce all that' is required every day. Under a proper system, working in conjunction with the physician, hospital, or educational influence, persuasion may be necessary. It may have to be applied not only to the employee but to the employer, and to the immediate superior o f the employee, and, above all, to the insurance adjuster i f he does not comprehend the problem and how it should be managed. Industrial accident boards should be keen to help in the replace ment work o f the wounded o f our great war. We should be alive to the opportunity that is afforded to develop industrial surgeons through the great opportunity o f concentrated work. The improved methods developed for the treatment, cure, and re habilitation o f the crippled in the army of warfare should be made available for the improved handling o f the injured or disabled in the army o f industry. Hand in hand with adequate medical and surgical diagnosis and treatment must go a firm, direct, and controlling administrative function. SHOULD MEDICAL SERVICE BE LIMITED CASES? IN COMPENSATION BY FREDERIC M . WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER, CONNECTICUT WORKMEN’ S COMPENSA TION COMMISSION. My own opinion is that this question must be answered in the nega tive. The time has, happily, long since passed when the general policy o f compensation legislation requires either apology or justifi cation. The ingenuity o f the bar has exhausted itself in efforts to attack the constitutionality o f such legislation, either optional or compulsory in character. The question can no longer be considered an open one. The live questions for the consideration o f students o f the subject are, however, now just as numerous, as intricate, and as important as ever. W e must consider: 1st, what are the funda mental objects to be accomplished by such legislation? 2d, what is the best method o f attaining the desired results? 3d, what is the fair construction of the particular statute or part o f a statute under consideration in a particular case? The last problem is our daily routine. The main benefit o f such a meeting as this is interchange o f ideas as to the correct answers to the two preceding questions. From several years o f study and practical experience my own conclusions are: (a) The main object to be accomplished is the prevention of industrial accidents. This can never be entirely brought about and, therefore, in practice, our efforts are to make such accident's as few as possible, (b) Given the victim of an industrial accident, the most important factor o f the problem is the restoration o f such victim to his proper niche in the industrial world with the least pos sible impairment o f earning power, (c) The actual payment o f money for incapacity or loss of member, or function, while a vital necessity, is really subordinate to the two fundamental objects. Assuming these premises to be well founded it necessarily follows that provisions o f these statutes commonly spoken of as statutory aid, either medical or surgical, are o f prime importance. Connecticut has, so far as I am aware, the most liberal mediealaid provisions o f any o f the States. The only other statute with substantially the same features o f statutory aid without limit as to time or amount is the Federal statute. The ideas summarized above are in substance the same as expressed by the writer in two recent cases, Olmsted v. Lamphier et al., on 152 L IM IT A T IO N OF M ED ICAL SERVICE---- F . M . W IL L IA M S . 153 appeal reserved for the advice of the supreme court of errors, and Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co., appealed to the superior court. In the Olmstead case the court has just handed down an opinion sus taining the commissioner and dismissing the appeal.. In the Saddle mire case the same result has followed; hence the ideas above ex pressed may be said, in substance, to represent the settled doctrine o f Connecticut on this subject. In the Olmsted case a principal point in issue was as to whether the broad and general provisions o f section 7 o f our act, “ The em ployer as soon as he has knowledge of any such injury shall provide a competent physician or surgeon to attend the injured employee, and in addition shall furnish such medical and surgical* aid or hospital service as such physician or surgeon shall deem reasonable or neces sary,” includes the price o f an artificial leg, made necessary by an injury. The court held that it did include such leg, saying among other things that the term surgical aid “ is not limited to the personal service o f the surgeon, but includes all the means and instrumentali ties used in surgery which will help effect a cure.” Again the court says, “ Our act contemplates the furnishing o f all the medical aud surgical aid that is reasonable and necessary. The purpose o f this provision is to restore the injured employee to a place in our industrial life as soon as possible by the use o f all medical and surgical aid and hospital service which the ordinary usages o f the modern science o f medicine and surgery furnish. “ Humanity and economic necessity in this instance are in harmony in working for the accomplishment of the individual and o f the public welfare.” When our act was first passed it had the ordinary provision for statutory aid for a 30-day period, with the usual result—dissatis faction. An effort was made to increase the period, though probably no one thought at first of more than a 60 or 90 day period. Most injuries are relieved within a less time. WThen the legislature com mittee began to consider the proper period it at once saw what every one who will view the problem with an open mind must see, that the logical time to cut off medical or surgical treatment is when the patient no longer needs it. The result in our State is good. No effort has been made to make any change. It is probable that payments for statutory aid under our system amount to a little more than the direct compensation payments, and this is quite justifiable on the theory which, as above outlined, main tains in Connecticut. SHOULD MEDICAL SERVICES BE LIMITED IN COMPENSATION CASES? BY RAPHAEL LEWY, M. D., CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER, NEW YORK STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. Medical service should not be limited in any respect in compensa tion cases, but should be continued until medical or surgical treat ment is no longer necessary. A limitation of time may be doing a serious injustice to the claimant, as he may be unable to pay for private medical services after the expiration of the legal time limit, or he will look for the cheapest services, or he will have poor advice in selecting medical treatment, and may perhaps not receive skillful or diligent treatment. Also, there is no accurate or exact way of estimating in advance how long the need for medical services may continue. In a serious or protracted case, complications may occur which will unexpectedly prolong the treatment necessary. Even where the time limit is comparatively long, as 90 days or more, and where, as in some States, provision is made for continuing medical treatment, where notice is given, within a stated period in advance o f the expiration o f the time limit, it is not always possible to deter mine whether further treatment will be necessary, 154 T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 2 6 — A F T E R N O O N S E S S IO N . CHAIRM AN, €K J. FA Y , M. D., IOW A. T H E C O M P E N S A T IO N O F D IS A B IL IT Y D U E T O P R E E X IS T IN G D IS E A S E , A G G R A V A T E D O R A C C E L E R A T E D B Y A C C ID E N T O R IN J U R Y . BY MEYER LISSNER, MEMBER,. CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION. The doctor tells us that our subject may satisfactorily be discussed only through familiarity with certain principles concerned with the relationship o f disease to the body. Primarily the new-born babe is sterile; that is, the skin covering and the mucous lining o f the body are free from organisms of all kinds, with perhaps the possible exception of inherited syphilis. Within a few hours of the time o f birth this covering and lining o f the body becomes the site of myriads of organisms, many of which under favorable conditions may produce body infection. The battle against the germ thus begins almost before the child has opened its eyes, and,, in general, it may be said that an individual begins to die at the moment of birth. Many o f the organisms which, under favorable circumstances, met with in the individual host, may produce disease, are found to inhabit the mouth and air passages at practically all times. Ordi narily these organisms are held within certain limits by the normal body functions. They gain admission to the body through diiferent portals and then only when at the portals an opportunity for germ activity is rendered possible through a local or general lowering o f the body resistance. An excellent illustration o f this activity ap pears in the ordinary infection o f an incised finger. Nearly always a finger heals following injury, by primary union, while occasionally a severe infection results which may not only jeopardize but even terminate the individual’s life. The course o f a disease aggravated by trauma is dependent almost altogether upon the ability o f the body to manufacture white blood cells (scavengers). It is a fight between these scavengers and the germs. In the event that blood cells are not sent to the site o f an injury in sufficient numbers the germs gain the upper hand and pass into the circulatory apparatus o f the body. All this is quoted, not on a basis of personal knowledge, but be cause the doctor tells us these things and says it is necessary, in con sidering our subject, to bear them in mind in order to emphasize two 155 156 M ED ICAL SESSION. conditions, namely: That infection is possible only when organisms are present and body resistance is below par, the former condition never being wanting, and the latter always possible. These scientific facts would seem to indicate that the narrow ap plication o f the general rule that the employer takes the employee subject to his physical condition at the time he enters the employment has, in many instances, worked grave injustice to the employer, by holding him liable for serious and in many cases total disability due to slight aggravation o f preexisting disease. At first the California Commission was inclined to apply the rule strictly against the em ployer, but latterly it has taken into consideration more fully the cir cumstance o f each case, and in cases o f chronic disease, when more than a reasonable period has elapsed during which compensation has been paid, where the injury was comparatively slight and the disease the principal contributing factor to the disability, the commission has ordered compensation payments discontinued. In the amendment o f 1917, which became effective January 1,1918, this practice of the commission was confirmed and written into the law under the definition of the term “ injury,” as follow s: Section 3 (4 ). The term “ injury ” as used in this act shall include any in ju ry or disease arising out o f the employment. In case o f aggravation o f any dis ease existing prior to such injury, compensation shall be allowed only fo r such proportion o f the disability due to the aggravation o f such prior disease as may reasonably be attributed to the injury. The section o f the act just quoted refers generally to the announced subject o f this discussion— “ The compensation of disability due to preexisting disease, aggravated or accelerated by accident or injury but there is another aspect of this problem that must properly be considered at the same time— the aggravation or exacerbation o f an injury due to preexisting disease. A latent tuberculosis lighted up and made active by a chest injury is an example o f the first class, which comes strictly within the definition of our announced subject; the case o f a lesion which is stubborn in healing, due to syphilitic infection, is an example of an injury aggravated or exacerbated by disease. The more one has to do with the administration o f a compensation act, the more one becomes impressed with the fact that while it is easy to lay down a general rule, much latitude must be allowed, and much discretion be exercised in the application of general rules to particular cases; in other words, to a large extent, each case must be decided on the basis o f its own particular facts, with the object o f doing justice between employer and employee, keeping in mind always the purposes and limitations o f compensation statutes; and this observation applies with full force to the class o f cases we are now discussing. Two men may die o f the same disease, in both cases D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO PR E E XIST IN G DISEASE---- M . LIS SN E R . 157 death to some extent being superinduced by something done in the course o f the employment, and yet in one case compensation be allowed and in the other denied; for example, the California Com mission awarded a death benefit in the case o f a delivery man who had a long standing aortic aneurysm, and who died o f a rupture of the aneurysm caused by unusually heavy lifting and straining. (Draper v. Anderson Lore & Co., 1 I. A. C. Dec. 132) • while in the case o f a roofer who also died from the rupture of an aortic aneurysm, but whose labors required no heavy exertion, the death benefit was denied. (Anderson v. De Paoli, 4 I. A. C. Dec. 82.) But while to a large extent each case must stand on its own bottom, from repeated consideration of the same question there has de veloped a fairly definite threefold classification o f cases arising under our general subject. I. LATENT DISEASES LIGHTED UP BY INJURY. In these cases ordinarily the whole disability is compensated, the curable disease charged to the employment, and an award rendered in case o f death. Example : Latent tuberculosis lighted up by severe chest injury. H . DISABILITY DITE MAINLY TO DISEASE BUT AGGRAVATED BY INJURY. In these cases compensation is usually given only for the period during which the aggravation of disease may reasonably be attributed to the accident and then terminated. Example: Chronic osteoarthritis aggravated by slight injury. m . DISABILITY DUE TO INJURY AND PROLONGED BY PREEXISTING DISEASE. In these cases treatment of the disease as well as the injury is ordered at the expense o f the employer; that is, the employer must treat the disease in order to cure the injury. In exceptional cases where the preexisting disease becomes the chief factor and prevents the cure o f the injury, the compensation is sometimes terminated and a permanent disability rating made. Exam ple: Healing of fracture or wound delayed by syphilitic in fection. The following discussion o f decisions o f the California Commis sion will illustrate the application of these principles: SY P H IL IS. The complication o f injuries through syphilitic infection has given the California Commission a good deal o f concern. At first the commission was disposed to deny compensation or terminate liability whenever by Wassermann test, or otherwise, it 158 M E D IC A L SESSION. was demonstrated that recovery was delayed through syphilitic in fection; and insurance carriers were not slow to take advantage of this attitude on the part o f the commission, and to urge the termina tion o f disability payments in practically every case where a positive Wassermann could be procured. Later on the commission, upon ad vice, came to regard it as a rather faulty view to hold syphilitic in fection responsible in most o f these cases. W e were informed on good authority that the bone o f the syphilitic, the incised wound, and so forth, usually heal without any evidence o f a luetic background; in other words, syphilis is ordinarily not invited by a local site by reason o f trauma. It was several years after it began considering cases complicated by syphilitic infection before the California Commission really found its own mind upon the subject. In May, 1917, the case o f Peterson v. Bristol Bay Packing Co., 4 I. A. C. Dec. 122, was decided. The applicant was injured July, 1916, by an oven door falling on his knee. The defendants, after giving treatment for several months, petitioned for termination o f disability indemnity on the ground that the synovitis was complicated by preexisting syphilis* pro longing the normal period o f recovery. It appeared, however, that the syphilitic condition could be cured by appropriate antisyphilitic treatment. The commission denied the petition to terminate dis ability indemnity and ordered treatment for the syphilis. In deciding this case the commission said: These disorders are so prevalent that if compensation were denied wherever an injury is complicated by so-called 66specific ” disease, a great many worthy people would be without compensation to tide them over their period o f adversity, and, in so far, the law would fail o f its purpose to prevent poverty arising out o f injury. * * * Compensation is not alone for those who are without spot or blemish but for all who work, and there are thousands working who are af flicted with serious maladies which will complicate any injury they may suffer. Nevertheless, in most instances, their disability is proximately caused by their injury and not by their disease which, without injury to precipitate it, might scarcely have troubled them during the rest o f their natural lives. The commission distinguishes, how ever, between ordinary disability, prolonged by complications with specific diseases, and those more serious disabilities which are proximately caused, not by the injury, but by the specific disease, such as tabes dorsalis or paresis, or spontaneous fracture. In such cases the injuries which may have been suffered were only incidents contribut ing to, and not the proximate cause of, the disability or death, and therefore in such cases compensation will be allowed only in so far as the injuries did themselves, apart from the specific diseases, cause disability. About the same time the commission outlined its policy in relation to syphilis in the following circular: D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E XIST IN G DISEASE-----M . L ISSN E R . 159 T h e P o l ic y of t h e I n d u s t r ia l A ccid en t C o m m is s io n i n R ela t io n to S y p h i l i s . The policy here outlined is intended to serve as a guide and can not be con sidered as binding in all cases o f syphilitic infection. A fter some years o f experience, the reading o f much m edical testimony, and consultation w ith m edical authorities, the com m ission has reached the follow ing conclusions in relation to syphilitic com plications w ith other injuries. 1. In cases o f ordinary fractures, contusions and bruises the existence o f a syphilitic infection does not, commonly, com plicate the issue at all seriously and does not result in any substantial prolongation o f disability. In such cases the com plication o f syphilitic infection w ill be ignored. 2. But in cases where the syphilitic infection results in tabes dorsalis or paresis it w ill be the policy o f the commission to lim it the liability to such tem porary, or other, disability, as w ould probably have resulted from the injury i f there had been no syphilitic infection, and fo r the reason that the diseases above mentioned are constitutional and never the result o f injury, but always consequent upon syphilitic infection. It is the purpose o f this commission to hold the industry responsible for so m uch o f disability as such industry can reasonably be held responsible for, but there is no industry that should be held responsible for tabes dorsalis, paresis or spontaneous fractu re o f the bone. D e c is io n s . SPO N TA NE O U S FRACTURE. An interesting case, decided in March, 1915, was that o f a plasterer who, while ascending a ladder to a scaffolding, accidentally struck the shin o f his right leg against a brace, fracturing the tibia, for which he received treatment. About 90 days thereafter, while on crutches, stepping down some marble steps, he came down rather heavily upon the other leg and fractured the tibia o f that one. On careful ex amination it was discovered that he was suffering from syphilis in its tertiary stage. The commission held that it was a case o f spantaneous fracture for which industry could in no wise be responsible, and ocmpensation was denied. (Spangler v. Philbin, 2 I. A. C. Dec. 170.) A T R O P H Y OF O P T IC N E R V E . In the most recent case before the commission involving syphilitic infection, the applicant received a blow in the eye in the course o f his employment sufficient to cause some swelling of the lids and red ness o f the conjunctiva and to cut very slightly the cornea. He suf fered great pain, was in bed 10 days and was found to have lost the sight o f the eye. Expert medical examination showed that the blindness was due to atrophy of the optic nerve caused by syphilitic infection and tabes dorsalis. The commission held that such part of the disability complained o f as was properly attributable to the in jury could not have lasted longer than one month, and that the re mainder must be charged to the disease for which the industry was not responsible. (E --------- v. Weed, No. 5461, Aug. 21, 1918.) 160 M ED ICAL SESSION. GONORRHEA. The question usually arising under the compensation act is whether a particular case of inflammation o f the eye, or o f an infected joint, etc., is primarily caused by an injury, or results from gonorrheal in fection unaccompanied by trauma. D e c is io n s . C O M P E N S A T IO N A W A R D E D . A boy was thrown from a bicycle and struck heavily upon his hip. The injury was followed by inflammation and extensive destruction o f the bone. It was claimed by the insurance company that the dis ease was the result o f gonorrheal infection which had been contracted some years before and that the alleged trauma played no part in its development. The commission found the proof o f the fall to be sufficient and awarded compensation, attributing the disability proximately to the fall. (Laning v. U. S. Casualty Co., 3 I. A. C. Dec, 127.) C O M P E N S A T IO N D E N IE D . A gas fitter bruised his knee while crawling under a house while at work and extensive inflammation set in, resulting in destruction o f the knee joint. It was claimed that the inflammation was purely gonorrheal and the commission sustained this position. (Walker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 2 I. A. C. Dec. 738.) Compensation was claimed for an inflammation o f the eyeball alleged to be due to laceration. The condition was found to be gonor rheal and compensation was denied upon the ground that the in flammation was not sufficiently connected with any injury. (Marvin v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 2 I. A. C. Dec. 966.) O ST E O A R TH R ITIS. Osteoarthritis following trauma has been a very troublesome prob lem. There have been many cases where men have been seriously and, in some cases, permanently disabled or crippled through what one would class as a minor injury and which would not ordinarily seriously disable a man over a long period o f time. Medical testi mony has been to the effect that these people have suffered from osteoarthritis in the spine or other joints for varying periods before the time o f injury, and the injury, while not in itself producing the arthritis, has caused the condition to become active and progressive in character. The medical profession has stated that many o f these people would finally have become crippled independently o f accident. In the large majority of cases, however, a positive opinion as to the D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E XIST IN G DISEASE---- M . USSN ER.* 161 length o f time this would have taken has been impossible o f forma tion. Trauma, it is said, may change the course of the disease but no two cases o f trauma would produce the same results. For these reasons and others akin to them, it is impracticable, and would be most unjust, to compensate all cases alike, and it’ is manifestly neces sary to exercise judgment on the merits o f each case. The medical director o f the Industrial Accident Commission has suggested that cases presenting osteoarthritis and producing dis ability complicated by trauma shall be divided arbitrarily into three classes. I. Those in which no symptoms o f osteoarthritis are developed in the history o f the injured prior to the injury, and which do not show characteristic lesions commonly known to cause osteoarthritis, such as bad teeth, bad tonsils, chronic abscesses, urethritis, etc. II. Those in which moderate symptoms o f osteoarthritis but no crippling had been present before the injury or in which there are conditions present which are known frequently to be the cause of osteoarthritis. III. Those who were suffering prior to the injury from deformity and disability due to osteoarthritis in an advanced form. For purposes of compensation the medical director recommends the adoption o f the following scale: ( a ) That cases in class I may be considered as having 25 per cent o f disability chargeable to osteoarthritis. ( h ) Cases in class I I may be considered as having 50 per cent o f disability chargeable to osteoarthritis. ( c ) Cases in class I I I may be considered as having 75 per cent of disability chargeable to osteoarthritis. According to this scale, 25, 50, and 75 per cent o f the compensation would be deducted, depending upon the degree o f the previously existing osteoarthritis. While the recommendation o f our medical director has not been formally adopted by the commission, nevertheless in compensating cases complicated by osteoarthritis it has been the policy o f the commission to take into consideration the preexisting condition, and to terminate liability at what seems in each case the point where it would be unreasonable to charge the condition then existing to the employment. In some cases this might be within a comparatively short time after the accident, while in others compensation might be allowed for a period o f as long as a year or m ore; and in some cases a permanent disability rating might be made charging against the employer such portion of the disability as would seem to be proper under all o f the circumstances. 124247°-—10-------11 162 M E D IC A L SESSIG K. D e c is io n s L A T E N T O S T E O A R T H R IT IS P R E C IP IT A T E D . BY I N J U R Y ---- C O M P E N S A T I O N D E N I M ). A carpenter fell and strained his sacroiliac and lumbrosacral joint, and he thereafter suffered a disability due in part to traumatic neurosis, and in part to osteoarthritis, the cause o f which was latent in his system before the injury and which might have developed at any time but was actually precipitated by the injury. The commission held that the osteoarthritis was not proximately caused by the em ploym ent or the injury, and that the applicant was entitled to com pensation based upon the disability due to the traumatic neurosis only. (P orter v. Morse, 4 L A . C. Dec. 199.) In the follow in g cases o f arthritis, limited awards o f compensation were m ade: E X A C E R B A T IO N T H R O U G H I N F E C T I O N . A n employee, with chronic arthritis o f the finger joints and Dupuytren’s contraction o f the palm, suffered a slight injury to one o f his fingers, which became infected. The infection and injury were treated fo r several weeks and he was restored to his condition prior to the injury. This was held to be the lim it o f the em ployer’s liability. (Landrath ^..Mountain Copper Co., 4 I. A . C. Dec. 112.) E X A C E R B A T IO N THROUGH S P R A IN . A piano tuner, while holding a piano on edge, sustained a sprain to his back, hip, and left leg. Notwithstanding pain he continued w orking fo r two weeks, after which he was disabled by reason o f a condition which was diagnosed as osteoarthritis. A t the end o f six weeks, this disability had disappeared and he returned to work. The commission found, in effect, that, although the applicant was disabled by exacerbation o f a previously existing condition o f osteo arthritis, nevertheless, the disability was precipitated by the injury. I t was therefore held that the applicant’s disability was proxim ately caused by the injury and he was accordingly awarded compensation fo r the period o f the disability. (Thom as v. Eilers, £ I. A . C. Dec. 212.) L IG H T IN G UP O F C H R O N IC C O N D IT IO N . A pplicant sustained a strain to the back from the slipping o f a wrench which he was using underneath a cart. There immediately follow ed a disabling condition o f oesteoarthritis o f the spine. The commission found that since no symptoms o f the disease had shown themselves previous to the accident, although a chronic arthritis had D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E X IST IN G DISEASE— M . L IS SN E R . 163 probably already begun, and the disability was precipitated by the accident, the accident was the proxim ate cause o f the disability. A continuing award in favor o f the applicant was made. However, when the applicant had received compensation fo r the better part o f three years, the commission found that any disability sustained by him after that time was not proxim ately caused by the injury, and an order was made terminating indemnity payments. (Turner v. Santa Cruz, 2 I. A . C. Dec. 917.) C H R O N IC C O N D IT IO N , B U T NO P R E V IO U S D I S A B I L I T Y ---- C O M P E N S A T I O N IN FULL. A painter injured his foot through the giving way o f a staging on which he was working. The blow caused no fracture, but a disability ensued which was diagnosed as osteoarthritis. The evidence showed that the applicant, who was 63 years old, had had chronic osteoarth ritis and arteriosclerosis fo r a considerable time before the injury, which, however, were causing him no disability prior thereto. The medical testimony showed that the injury set up an inflammation which lighted up the quiescent arthritic condition. The commission held that the whole disability suffered by the applicant was proxi mately caused by the injury and was compensable. (W illiam son v. Shell Co., 4 I. A . C. Dec. 222.) H E A R T D ISE A SE . Many cases are found in which an employee with a previously diseased heart receives an injury, follow ed shortly by death from heart trouble. In those cases it is usually held that where the death occurs within a reasonably short period o f time from the injury, so that it may be said that the shock o f the injury caused the final overloading o f the heart which brought about its collapse, compen sation should be allowed. Where, however, the lapse o f time be tween the injury and death is such that the patient has had oppor tunity to overcome the immediate shock o f the injury, and death from subsequent heart disease occurred about as it would have oc curred before long had there been no injury, compensation should be denied. Difficult questions o f fact frequently arise as to whether the heart was in abnormal condition before the injury and whether the break ing down o f the heart was effected by the alleged injury. D e c is io n s C O M P E N S A T IO N . AW ARDED. Applicant suffered a severe and sudden strain when the entire weight o f a 300-pound crate o f blackboards was thrown upon him while it was being unloaded from a wagon. He immediately quit 164 M ED ICAL SESSION. work, and was found to have acute dilatation o f the heart. Medical opinion differed as to whether or not applicant had any heart trouble before the accident, but it was definitely established that before the accident he was able to work, play ball, etc., and was to all intents and purposes a well man, and that, i f he did have any prior heart weakness, the accident was by far the m ajor factor in causing the disability. F ull compensation was therefore granted fo r the disability. (W elch v. W eber, 2 I. A . C. Dec. 681.) A n application fo r disability indemnity was first brought by the injured man and an application fo r a death benefit was subse quently brought by the widow. Bolster, while picking cherries, fell si distance o f 15 feet, fracturing two ribs. Previous to the accident he had shown some symptoms o f heart weakness, such as slight shortness o f breath, but his work had not been interfered with. Since the accident his heart trouble had been severe and he had been unabl^ to work. The commission decided that the fall had in creased the trouble, that one-third o f the trouble should be attributed to the original condition and two-thirds to the fall, and he was given a rating fo r a permanent partial disability based on this con clusion. A few months thereafter the man died from the heart trouble, and his widow was allowed a death benefit. (Bolster v. California Mountain Fruit Co., No. 4923 [not reported].) C O M P E N S A T IO N D E N IE D . A 69-year-ola tailor fell 10 feet downstairs, severely shaking him up and hurting his right knee and spraining his left ankle. H e was much perturbed, believing he had narrowly escaped death. H e ap parently recovered, but nine days after the injury suffered a severe attack o f angina pectoris, and died o f chronic heart trouble four weeks from the injury. It appeared from the post-mortem examina tion that* the heart was in such a condition that death might have come at any time without the fall. The commission held that the fa ll might have hastened the death, but that this was not enough to ju stify charging the employment with an entire death benefit. (W aldm an v. Hermann, 1 I. A . C. Dec., Part I I , 82.) A man 74 years old, w orking on the pavement in a street, had his shovel knocked out o f his hand by an automobile, the handle strik ing him in the side and knocking the breath out o f him, causing him to sit down to regain his composure before returning to work. H e worked ten days, when he became ill, and continued so for about six weeks, when he died. The autopsy showed that he died o f adherent pericarditis, and that he had chronic m yocarditis; and the evidence was that he died prim arily o f inanition o f a decline o f physical powers rendering his system unable to resist the long existing heart D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E XIST IN G DISEASE— M . LIS SN E R . 165 troubles; and that i f the accident had any relation at all to the death, it was at most a trivial and inconsequential one, and could not be looked upon as the proximate cause o f death. (Farrish v. Nugent, 1 I. A. C. Dec., Part II, 98.) A stevedore, who had previously appeared to be strong and well, was struck in the side by a case o f leather while steadying the freight goin g down into the hold o f a vessel, and was knocked onto an auto mobile near by. H e worked on fo r about three weeks, then because o f a bad cold and general weakness went to a physician who found him in a bad state o f health with faulty heart action and a fatty tumor. H e reached the conclusion that these were caused by the injury sustained and applied fo r compensation, but the commission held that the slight injury had no causal connection with his trouble, which had been developing and had been brought to his attention by the injury sustained. (Lynn v. Pacific Coast S. S. Co. 1 I. A . C. Dec. 635.) A car repairer on entering defendant’s employ was found to have a slight cardiac enlargement'. W hile in their employ he was struck in the abdomen by a timber, which incapacitated him fo r a few hours only. Later while at work under a car he suffered a severe pain in the abdomen, presumably from a wrench sustained while using a hammer, and about a month afterwards went to a hospital, where the pain and other abdominal symptoms disappeared; but he experienced general debility and shortness o f breath, became anemic, showed symptoms o f chronic heart lesion, and some months later died. A n autopsy showed a serious dilation o f the heart, vegetations on the valves, adhesions and an enlargement o f the lymphatic glands. There was no evidence o f any trauma. The testimony showed that the dilatation which caused the death was predisposed by some sys temic disease and that all o f his symptoms could be explained by such disease. (Newell v. Pacific Electric Railw ay Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 442.) A pplicant while opening a bundle o f laundry smelled an offensive gas, became dizzy and faint, and was unable to continue work. Three days afterwards she had an irregular heart, and during the follow in g month had heart murmur and rapid pulse, the symptoms being those o f a heart that had been failing fo r some tim e; finally there was manifested a m ild acute heart' failure. H eld, that the con dition was merely a step in the advancement o f a preexisting disease o f the heart, possibly precipitated by the exertions in m oving the bundles o f laundry. (Bennett v. San Bernardino Laundry Co., 3 I. A. C. Dec. 229.) S. C. B ollinger, by the overturning o f an automobile, received a Colie’s fracture and bruises about the chest. H e rode fo r several hours thereafter and that evening an examination o f his heart showed 166 MEDICAL, SESSION. that compensation o f the heart was good. N o trouble with the heart appeared until the fourth day, when he suffered an attack o f de compensation. H e received treatment at a hospital fo r the heart condition, which steadily improved. On the tenth day after the in jury he suddenly died. F or some time previous to the accident the deceased had been suffering from endocarditis, and had had several attacks o f broken compensation. The autopsy showed that the cause o f death was this same heart condition, which is frequently the cause o f sudden death, and that death wrould inevitably have occurred suddenly and m ight have occurred at any time on slight exertion or without any injury. In view o f the seriousness o f the preexisting condition and the relative slightness o f the injury, a death benefit was denied. (B ollinger v. Pacific Chemical Co., 5 I. A. C. Dec. 14.) A R T ER IO SC L ER O SIS (IN C L U D IN G CEREBRO H E M O R R H A G E ). Arteriosclerosis as a disease, commonly known as hardening o f the arteries, is produced either by chronic ailments o f various sorts or occurs naturally in later life. A s far as known, it is never d i rectly produced by trauma, but may be aggravated by it. Such aggravation consists either in the increase o f the symptoms due to the disease, caused by weakening o f the body through serious injury, or from a rupture o f a hardened artery, particularly in the head, causing cerebro hemorrhage or apoplexy. D e c is io n s C O M P E N S A T IO N . AW ARDED. A n employee sustained a fall with a severe sprain o f the ankle and recovery was thereafter prolonged by reason o f a condition o f general arterial disease. The commission awarded compensation fo r full duration o f disability due to the injured ankle without dimi nution by reason* o f its prolongation by the disease. (D abila v. Aetna L ife Insurance Co., 1 I. A. C. Dec. 239.) A n employee, 63 years o f age, employed in an undertaking parlor aided in liftin g a 500-pound steel casket and immediately became in disposed. A fte r a few days he was taken seriously ill with paralysis o f one side, which the attending physician attributed to a rupture o f the blood vessel in the brain caused immediately by the heavy lift ing, but ultimately by a condition o f arteriosclerosis. Compensation was awarded upon the ground that the liftin g was the proximate cause. (Jones v. R oyal Idem nity Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 252.) D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E X IST IN G DISEASE-----M . LISSN E R . 167 A night watchman, 67 years o f age, suffering from pyuria and a marked degree o f arteriosclerosis, was assaulted by highwaymen and sustained various head injuries which thereafter w holly disabled him from labor, practically rendering him insane. The commission found that the disability was proxim ately brought about by the injury and awarded compensation. (F rohn v. State Compensation Insurance Fund et al., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 274.) C O M P E N S A T IO N D E N IE D . A n employee suffering from a marked degree o f arteriosclerosis sustained a slight laceration on his shin, which later became gan grened and necessitated amputation o f the leg. The medical testi mony showed that where gangrene arises from an infected wound, it develops in the immediate vicinity o f the wound, but where the gangrene develops from arteriosclerosis generally, it invariably com mences in the toes. As the wound in this case was not infected and the gangrene started in the toes, it was held that the amputation was necessitated solely by natural causes and no compensation was allowed for it. (B row n v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 190.) A pplicant was rem oving some packages o f stationery, which weighed about 48 pounds each, from a low truck which was stand ing about tw o feet from the ground, when he became dizzy, after wards complained o f pain in his head, and feeling sick was taken home and died soon after. T he autopsy surgeon testified that the man died o f cerebral hemorrhage from rupture o f the m iddle me ningeal artery, right side, due to general arteriosclerosis. Aw ard denied. (Mathewson v. United Railroads, No. 5442 [not reported].) V A R IC O SE V E IN S A N D ULCERS. Many workmen suffer from varicose veins, which condition is prac tically always due to natural causes and*not to trauma, and which affects their earning power and exposes them unduly to various sequelae, such as varicose ulcers, etc. The question has never been presented to the commission o f whether varicose veins can be caused by injury. The question usually arises as to whether the employer should be freed from liability fo r disability follow ing a trauma, where disability is in part due to trauma and in part due to the prior varicose condition. Here our commission has follow ed the policy o f allowing compensation wherever the disability is to a con siderable extent attributable to trauma, without regard to the pre disposing factor. W here, however, the normal skin has been changed by prior varicose ulcers to a very friable tissue which is likely to break out in ulcers on sustaining the slightest blow or scratch, or 168 M ED ICAL SESSION; even without any trauma at all, the commission has found the contri bution o f the later trauma to be so small in proportion to that o f the predisposing condition as to warrant a complete denial o f com pensation. D V A R IC O S E e c is io n s . U L C E R S ---- C O M P E N S A T IO N ALLOW ED. A n employee was hired to work as a laborer, and claimed that certain ulcers from which he had recently been suffering were caused by scratches and abrasions which were received by him while at work. The evidence showed that he had received the abrasions claimed, and that they had ulcerated, but further showed that he was troubled with varicose veins and had other ulcers before in other places. Compensation was awarded as it was not shown that the ulcers in question developed on the site o f any prior ulcers. (M cM ullen v. Standard Oil Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 169.) A n employee bruised his leg and the bruised area subsequently broke down into an ulcer, the duration o f which was greatly ex tended by a condition o f varicose veins. Compensation was allowed fo r the full period o f disability as it was not shown that the varicose condition attributed in any way to the original form ation o f the ulcers. (H offm an v. M aryland Casualty Co., 2 I. A . C. Dec. 183.) V A R IC O S E U L C E R S ---- C O M P E N S A T I O N D EN IED . The applicant sustained an injury to one leg causing a varicose ulcer. Such ulcers had been repeated and virulent leaving only scar tissue upon the shins o f the injured workman, so that the slightest abrasion o f the skin, which in a normal person would have amounted to nothing, resulted in protracted and stubborn ulcers. Compensa tion was denied, as the original injury, in the absence o f prior ulcers, would not have lasted beyond the waiting period. (K een v. Western Indemnity Co., 2 I. A . C. Dec. 524.) V A R IC O C E L E . A teamster was kicked by one o f his horses, receiving a glancing blow in the groin. H e was able to return to work within three or four weeks, but claimed an operation fo r the radical cure o f vari cocele. The commission found that while ordinarily this condition comes from gradual development, and not by trauma, the circum stances o f the injury led it to find in his favor, attributing the con dition to the accident. (M itchell v. McNab & Smith, 1 I. A. C. Dec. 116.) DISABILITY DUE TO PREEXISTING DISEASE— M . LISSNER. 169 TUBER CULOSIS. This commission has taken several occasions to emphasize the truth that it was not the intent o f the legislature, when it substi tuted the term “ in ju r y 55 fo r that o f “ accident ” in amending the act, to transform the law into a sickness insurance scheme. The act affords compensation fo r injuries, but not fo r sickness unless proximately caused by injuries. Compensation is wholly a charge against the employer and the industry which the employer follows, whereas sickness insurance, wherever it obtains, is borne only partially by the employer, and i f this commission were to be a party to the transform ing o f a compen sation law into a sickness insurance law, great injustice would result to employers and to the industries in which they are engaged. The change from the w ord “ accident ” to u injury ” in the amended law, brings within the purview o f such law certain diseases known as occupational or industrial diseases, but tuberculosis has no recog nized status as an occupational disease. There are no known occu pations, unless it be certain form s o f m ining or nursing tuberculosis patients, which to any great degree result in inflicting tuberculosis upon those who follow such occupations. This is not saying that tuberculosis may not in certain very exceptional cases be the product o f an injury, although it would be extremely difficult, in most cases, affirmatively to establish a proximal connection between an injury and a resulting tubercular condition. D e c is io n s . In the follow in g cases o f tuberculosis, compensation was allowed: A C C E L E R A T IO N T H R O U G H CHEST IN J U R Y . Disability from tuberculosis has been compensated by the commis sion where a chest injury (striking chest on wheel o f wagon) caused traumatic pneumonia, which was follow ed by active tuberculosis which the evidence showed was probably present before but might never have troubled the employee in the absence o f the injury. (Huffm an v. Escondido Eochdale Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 207.) A severe chest blow and the inhalation o f acid fumes while recover ing from the injury, held to have lighted up a preexisting infection and the whole disability compensable. (Cuthbertson v. Hercules Powder Co., No. 5492, June 19, 1918 [not reported].) A C C E L E R A T IO N THROUGH S T R A IN . The commission found that strain occurred in holding back sacks o f flour from falling as the employee was piling same, which set into activity a pulmonary tuberculosis which theretofore had been in a 170 M E D IC A L SESSION", condition o f quiescence and equilibrium. A pplicant reported off, felt badly fo r four or five days, had a pulmonary hemorrhage, and has been ill with lung trouble ever since. A continuing award was made in favor o f applicant. (Botterell v. Splivado, No. 3887, June 13, 1917.) A C C E L E R A T IO N T H R O U G H A N E S T H E T I C . The employee sustained a hernia fo r which he underwent an oper ation in September, 1917. F ollow in g the operation, however, he developed pulmonary tuberculosis, which resulted in his death in October, 1917. The evidence showed that the deceased had had a latent tuberculosis, which was lighted up and became active as a result o f the ether anesthetic given at the operation and the depres sion and confinement subsequent thereto. The commission held, on expert testimony, that the tubercular pneumonia which caused death was proxim ately due to the operation, and that therefore the death was proxim ately caused by, and arose out of, the employment, and was compensable. (C ox v. California Southern R ailroad Co., 5 I. A . C. Dec. 10.) T U B E R C U L O S IS I N T E S T IC L E . W here employee had had no active tuberculosis for three years prior to injury and then a blow on the testicle centralizes the infec tion there compensation was allowed (Stone v. F. L. Smith Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 365), but denied under similar circumstances in Ben jamin v. Pacific, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 419. In the follow in g cases compensation was denied: H E M O R R H A G E F R O M S L IG H T E X E R T IO N . A deliveryman sustained a hemorrhage from the lungs in crank ing an automobile, follow ed by fou r weeks’ disability. The commis sion held that cranking caused exertion no more severe than was usual in such act and that the hemorrhage arose from a tuberculous condition o f the lungs which was such as to render a hemorrhage possible and likely upon a slight or no exertion; that therefore the hemorrhage and the consequent disability did not arise out o f and were not proxim ately caused by said employment. (Broem m er v. P eople’s Baking Co., No. 4799, Jan. 10, 1918.) A C C E L E R A T IO N F R O M E X P O S U R E . W here an employee, suffering from a cold or grip, was exposed for several days to dampness and receives a slight blow in the back, caus in g no disability at the time, and fou r days later suffered a hemor- D ISA B IL ITY DUE T O 'P R E E X IS T IN G DISEASE-----M . L IS SN E R . 171 rliage o f the lungs and was found to be suffering from tuberculosis o f considerable standing, it was held that the tuberculosis was not proxim ately caused by the employment, and an award was denied. (Coates v . Elsinore, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 269.) T U B E R C U L O S IS O F S P I N E . Compensation was denied where a conductor, in jum ping from a train in the usual manner in the course o f his employment, precipi tates a tuberculous condition o f the spine resulting in disabling ab scesses. (Agezelow ^.,Mt. Tamalpais etc. Ry., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 169.) ST R E E T S W E E P E R I N H A L I N G D U S T . Compensation was denied a street sweeper who had been so engaged fo r 10 years, and fo r 2 or 3 years had suffered from asthma, when he was found to have been suffering from tuberculosis o f the lungs. It appeared that street sweepers were no more subject to the disease than any other members o f the public, and that while the inhalation o f street dust m ight predispose one to the disease, the inhalation o f large numbers o f the germs would not produce in fec tion. (Lopez v. City o f San D iego, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 497.) H O S P IT A L O RDERLY. A n emergency hospital orderly who came in contact with tubercu losis patients nearly every day was denied compensation fo r such disease. (B loom v. City and County o f San Francisco, No. 5261, Mar. 29, 1918 [not reported].) P A R T IA L C O M P E N S A T IO N I N C H R O N I C C ASE. The applicant was injured by falling off a hand car, the wheels striking him and rolling him over upon the rails and between the ties, causing severe injury. T he medical evidence disclosed the fact that applicant had long been a sufferer from a slow tubercular proc ess in the lung. The commission found that the disability, from which applicant suffered as the result o f the accident, terminated about three months thereafter, and that whatever disability existed after that date was caused by a tubercular condition remotely and not proxim ately referable to the injury and therefore not com pensable. (M asich v. N. W . P. R. R% . Co., 2 I. A . C. Dec. 539.) PN EU M O N IA. Responsibility fo r pneumonia presents many different topics. F or obvious reasons, it is almost never claimed that a prior pneumonia is accelerated by a subsequent trauma occurring in the course o f the 172 M E D IC A L SESSION. employment. The questions most frequently presented are usually, when pneumonia is said to have a traumatic origin, and when not. D e c is io n s . In the follow in g cases compensation has been awarded for dis ability or death produced by pneum onia: A n employee was knocked from a w harf and inhaled salt water into the lungs, causing pneumonia due partly to the irritation o f the lungs and partly to alcoholism. (Sm ith v. Pacific Surety Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 197.) Compensation was granted where pneumonia follow ed an opera tion fo r amputation o f the finger, being prim arily produced by the effect o f the anesthetic and the surgical shock. (Favero v. City o f Richm ond, 1 I. A . C. Dec. 225.) H ypostatic pneumonia resulting from confinement in bed follow in g a fracture. (M ajeau v. Em ployers’ Liability, 2 I. A . C. Dec. 443.) Pleuropneumonia follow ed exposure to stormy weather while being taken from the scene o f an accident to a hospital, the original injury being to the hand. (D ecorm ier v. Western Indem nity Co., 2 I. A . C. Dec. 756.) Lobar pneumonia resulted in death 5 days after sustaining a back injury, the employee showing hemorrhage o f the lungs a day after the accident and before the pneumonia developed. (A iello v. F idelity & Casualty Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 533.) Lobar pneumonia developed the day after receipt o f a chest in ju ry and was held to have been caused by it. (Cledou v. Pacific Casualty Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 233.) In the follow in g cases compensation was denied upon the ground that the alleged trauma was not the proximate cause o f the pneu monia : Deceased died from lobar pneumonia about one month after his injury (hernia) while confined to a hospital follow in g an operation fo r the cure o f his hernia. (H olt v. Swayne & H oyt, 1 1. A . C. Dec. 655.) Lobar pneumonia developed under such circumstances that it was shown to have been in existence before the alleged trauma. (Dennis v. Western Indem nity Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 463.) A dredger man, whose w ork exposed him to frequent wetting, con tracted pneumonia, but no definite exposure was shown to be the cause thereof. (D onnelly v . Ocean Accident & Guarantee Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 393.) A stevedore storing frozen meats in a refrigerator room on a ship developed lobar pneumonia, no particular trauma being alleged. (H oefer v. London Guarantee & A ccident Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 194.) D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO PK E E X IST IN G DISEASE— M . LISSN EK . 173 IN T E S T IN A L D ISEASES. In considering abdominal cases the commission has said: “ W e think the industry chargeable with the consequences o f all accidents grow ing out o f the industry, but it is not properly chargeable with results that have Only a coincidental relation to such accidents, and are not proxim ately caused by them.” I t must be admitted that by com paring digests o f some o f these decisions, the awards o f the commission will not always seem to be consistent, but these cases well illustrate the suggestion heretofore made that each o f them must be decided on the basis o f its own facts. D e c is io n s . P E R IT O N IT IS F R O M R U P T U R E OF D U O D E N A L U L C E R . W here an employee lifted, out o f its bed in the ground, a stone weighing 250 pounds, and by reason o f the strain sustained a fatal peritonitis due to perforations o f a chronic duodenal ulcer, although ultimately the wall o f the duodenum m ight have given way entirely as a result o f the ulcerous process, held, the injury and death were proxim ately caused by the strain sustained in the employment. (W hite v. County o f Los Angeles, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 83.) A teamster was kicked at but not hit by a mule. He had been out o f condition for a few days and had complained o f stomach trouble and indigestion, but directly after the incident with the mule he was seized with severe pain and forced to quit work, and two days later the symptoms becoming alarming he was taken to a hospital, operated on and found to be suffering from peritonitis caused by perforations o f a duodenal ulcer. I t was claimed that the perforation was caused by the strain o f avoiding the kick o f the mule. The commission held that the strain complained o f was a mere incident and not the cause o f the perforation, which w^ould un questionably have taken place in the immediate future had there been no unusual strain at all experienced. Compensation was denied. (A llen v. Southwestern Surety Insurance Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 67.) A n employee, through a strain, sustained a slight perforation o f a preexisting duodenal ulcer. H e was given hospital treatment and warned that i f he left the hospital his condition would probably prove fatal, but that i f he would continue treatment he would prob ably recover. H e nevertheless returned to his home and thereafter suffered another perforation which caused peritonitis, from which he died. The commission held that the refusal to continue medical treatment' was unreasonable within the meaning o f section 16 ( e) o f the act and proxim ately caused his death, and the defendants were discharged from liability. (Stanway v. San Joaquin, 4 I. A . C. Dec« 373.) 174 M E D IC A L SESSION. R U P T U R E O F P A N C R E A T IC CYST. A laborer fell from a bean cutter and ruptured a pancreatic cyst which he had had fo r some time, but which medical testimony showed might at some indefinite time have ruptured or might have been ab sorbed and never ruptured. I t was held that, under the rule that the employer took the employee subject to the condition in which he found him, the whole disability was proxim ately caused by and arose out o f the employment. (Rategan v. Bates, 4 I. A . C. Dec. 78.) S E P T IC E M IA F R O M G A L L S T O N E S . A carpenter fell about fou r feet upon some sand and was so jarred as to loosen some inflammatory products o f a prior attack o f gall stones. H e died o f general septicemia and the commission held that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the fall was the proxi mate cause o f the death. (L in d v. Anderson, 4 I. A . C. Dec. 103.) G A S T R O IN T E S T IN A L T R O U B L E . A laborer 56 years o f age who had fo r several years done the same kind o f work as that which he was doing at the time o f his injury sustained a strain which caused no disability at the time, and he con tinued w orking fo r five days and then sustained another similar strain which was follow ed by a disabling gastrointestinal trouble due to a preexisting abdominal weakness o f considerable standing, which would have produced such ailment at any time on the suffer ing o f such strains. I t was held that only such disability as was reasonably attributable to the injury was compensable; that such dis ability could not reasonably be said to extend beyond six months from injury, and an award was made accordingly. (K ibler v. State Com pensation Ins. Fund, 4 I. A . C. Dec. 361.) C O L IT IS . Infection in the hand, resulting in the serious illness o f a street sweeper and lowering his power to resist the lighting up o f a dormant colitis, was held to be the proximate cause o f death from the latter. A w ard fo r full death benefit was made. (Mtirais v. City o f San Jose, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 141.) H E R N IA . One o f my earliest impressions, as an industrial accident commis sioner, was that o f surprise at the number o f cases involving hernia that came up fo r consideration. A t that time, about three years ago, the policy o f the commission in hernia cases was quite strict. A n ap plicant had to make out a pretty clear case o f no previous trouble or disability before receiving an award. There was a disposition in some D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO PB& EXISTIN G DISEASE---- M . LIS SN E R . 175 cases, known as “ border-line cases,” when physicians testified to operative findings indicating a preexisting chronic condition, to hold the employer^ fo r the cost o f the operation, but refuse compensation during the treatment and recovery. In a recent case the commission decided that when an employer assumed the responsibility o f the operation, he had to see the employee through the period o f treat ment and recovery and pay compensation in full until the employee was able to return to w o r k ; and in my opinion this is as it should be. I feel that we are justified in requiring the employer to “ fish or cut bait.” H e may submit the case to the commission i f he wishes to deny liability, but i f he voluntarily opens a man up he should p rop erly see him through the period o f convalescence. T he P o l ic y or the I n d u s t r ia l to A H c c id e n t C o m m is s io n in R e l a t io n e r n ia . The policy outlined is intended to serve as a guide and can not be considered as binding in all hernia cases. 1. The issue o f predisposition to hernia is regarded as unimportant. 2. A ny hernia, whether complete or incomplete, resulting from strain or wrench or other industrial injury, is compensable. 3. A chronic hernia, i f injured or aggravated by injury, is not ordinarily compensable. 4. A n incomplete hernia, that is merely incipient, subsequently completed through an independent injury, w ill ordinarily be com pensable. 5. In hernia cases it is not necessary that the evidence must show an immediate collapse or disability on the part o f the injured person. There should, however, be p ro o f o f pain or discom fort accompanying the alleged injury sufficient, at least, to cause pause and complaint, with corroboration, i f possible. 6. A moderate permanent disability indemnity will be allowed fo r hernia in those cases where operation fo r the radical cure o f the same is fo r any reason not advisable and the commission w ill be disposed to approve any reasonable compromise and settlement between the parties in such cases. 7. In all cases o f hernia in which the commission shall find the injury remediable by operation the applicant w ill be awarded such operation as a part o f the medical, surgical, and hospital treatment to which he is entitled to cure and relieve him from the effects o f the injury. The expense thereof must be paid by his employer or insurance carrier. I f the operation is not offered to the applicant he may secure it, charging the reasonable expense thereof to the em ployer or insurance carrier. In all such cases the applicant w ill be denied further compensation i f he refuses either to accept or secure operative relief. 176 M E D IC A L SESSION. N E P H R IT IS (B R IG H T ’S D IS E A S E ). In a few cases compensation has been claimed directly fo r an ex acerbation by trauma o f preexisting nephritis. Such cases coming before the commission are: A n employee suffering from a m ild chronic B right’s disease over heated himself when fighting a fire upon the em ployer’s premises and the disease returned with increased severity. It was held that the resulting disability was mainly due to the preexisting disease and not to the injury, and compensation was denied. (Stenburg v. O liver Salt Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 295.) It was claimed that a laborer in a chemical works sustained an exacerbation due to constant inhaling o f sulphuric acid fumes. The commission found that the asthmatic touch was due to this cause but nephritis was not exacerbated thereby. (Costain v. Frankfort General Ins. Co., I. A . C. Dec. 334.) The question most frequently arises as to whether nephritis may be proximately caused by an injury. An employee suffered a fall from a trestle and was exposed to severe climatic conditions of cold and wet while lying injured before being gotten into a house. He died 10 days later from acute ne phritis which under the circumstances the commission found was caused by the injury. (Gale v. U. S. Fidelity & Casualty Co.* 3 I. A. C. Dec. 363.) Compensation was denied where acute B right’s disease developed 5 days after the fall, upon the ground that there was no evidence o f physical injury to the kidneys at the time o f the fall, and that acute B righ t’s disease is probably never traumatic in origin. (H usvick v. Simms & Chandler, 1 I. A . C. Dec. 266.) A death benefit was awarded where an employee received a blister upon his heel while at work and the blister became infected, causing death. The medical testimony showed that the infection resulted in poisoning the blood stream, culminating in the breaking down o f the kidneys. (Sheadon v. R ed R iver Lumber Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 640.) LUMBAGO, In general it may be said that lumbago is a condition occurring from natural causes and not caused by injury. The difficulty usually arises in determining whether a particular employee suffering from a painful back is suffering from lumbago, coming on naturally, or from various traumatic conditions, which might be either sacroiliac slip, bruised muscles, strained ligaments, or osteoarthritis condition o f the lower spine. A n employee claimed that he strained his back while at work. It was held that the pain in the back was due to lumbago and not to a D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E X IST IN G DISEASE-----M . L IS S N E R . 177 wrench received while at work and compensation was denied. son v. Pacific Casualty Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 178.) (G ib D IA B E T E S . No cases have been found in which it is claimed that an old dia betes was accelerated by a later injury. The question usually pre sented is whether diabetes can be produced by trauma. D e c is io n s . A boiler maker was struck in the abdomen by a piece o f iron, in capacitating him fo r only a few minutes, and about three weeks later was found suffering from tonsilitis and shortly afterwards from dia betes. It was held that the evidence was insufficient to show that the diabetes was produced by injury. (W illiam s v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 4 I. A . C. Dec. 202.) A n employee was w orking upon a scaffolding at the time it col lapsed, causing him to sustain a heavy fall with a fracture o f sev eral ribs and injuries to the head. In subsequent medical examina tions a diabetic condition was discovered which it was claimed was caused by the injury. The commission found that such condition was proximately produced by the injury and directed the furnishing o f medical treatment for its relief. (Wareham v. Royal Indemnity Co., decided Aug. 24, 1918, and not yet reported.) M E N IN G IT IS. No case has been found where prior meningitis was accelerated or aggravated by subsequent trauma. The question, which usually is decided in the negative, is whether the disability or death from meningitis may be said to be proxim ately caused by an injury occur ring about the time o f the onset. D e c is io n s . In the follow in g cases compensation was denied: A n employee sustained the loss o f a toe by accident, the wound apparently healing, and some months later suffered a series o f boils, the infection o f these boils subsequently penetrating the blood stream and causing death from meningitis. H eld, the original in jury was not established as the proximate cause o f the terminal dis ease and death. (Stephens v. Em ployers’ Liability Assurance Cor poration, 2 I. A . C. Dec. 178.) It was held that death from meningitis was not shown to have been caused by injury occurring in the course o f and arising out o f the employment, where the only evidence was that the deceased in124247°—19------ 12 178 M ED ICAL SESSION. advertently scratched a pim ple on her face with her finger nail while at work, and that the pim ple became infected, causing death from meningitis, there being no evidence to show that she was working, in infectious or poisonous materials. (Cannon v. Pacific Telephone &> Telegraph Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 214.) W here a carpenter fell from a scaffold and injured his back but continued to work fo r nine months, though com plaining o f pain, and thereafter was taken ill from cerebrospinal meningitis, the evidence failed to show, in view o f the short period o f incubation o f the germ, that death was due to the fall. (B row n v. City o f Los Angeles, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 468.) A N T E R IO R P O L IO M Y E L IT IS (IN F A N T IL E P A R A L Y S IS ). But one case o f this disease appears in our records. Deceased, a motor truck driver, while liftin g a 3,000 pound trans form er by means o f a crowbar fo r the purpose o f putting rollers under it, suffered a severe pain in his back which he ascribed to wrenching caused by lifting. The pain in the back continued and the follow in g day additional pain developed in his side and abdomen. Shortly afterward he became paralyzed, and died six days after the injury. The autopsy showed no evidence o f traumatism in the back, but disclosed conditions o f the spine which showed that death was caused by anterior poliom yelitis, and compensation was denied upon the ground that the evidence failed to show any connection between the liftin g and the onset or development o f the disease. (M cIntosh v. B oyal Indem nity Co., 3 I. A. C. Dec. 178.) SARCOMA. Our commission has had to consider an unusually interesting series o f cases involving sarcoma, which gave us a great deal o f concern and necessitated much reading o f learned medical briefs before the com mission discovered how little the doctors really knew about the etiology o f this truly terrible disease. The commission finally came unanimously to the conclusion that it was justified in holding with those medical authorities who claim that trauma is a causative, or at least' predisposing, factor in these cases, and made awards in favor o f the applicants in four cases o f sarcoma, which curiously enough came before the commission fo r consideration at about the same time. D SARCOM A I N e c is io n s . H A N D FROM H A M M E R BLOW . A blacksmith struck the back o f his left hand with a hammer, and a lump immediately appeared at the site o f the blow, which D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E X IST IN G DISEASE---- M . LISSN E R . 179 was thereafter diagnosed as a rapidly grow ing sarcoma. It appeared that a toy cannon had exploded in the blacksmith’s hand several years before, but he had^ujffered no disability. X -ra y pictures taken o f the sarcoma revealed the presence therein o f particles o f metal. The medical testimony was inconclusive as to whether the sarcoma originated at the time o f the explosion and then remained in a quiescent state and was lighted up by the blow on the hand, or whether it originated at the time o f the blow. Held, that the evi dence was sufficient to show by a reasonable preponderance o f likeli hood that the sarcoma was caused by the blow. Eleven months after the injury the arm was amputated at the shoulder. It is now (S ep tember, 1918) a year since the operation and the injured seems to be in good health. (R oyal Indemnity Co. v. Becker, 4 I. A . C. Dec. 148.) S A R C O M A F R O M S L IG H T A N K L E B R U IS E . A salesman bruised his ankle by striking it against the street curb in getting out o f an automobile. The ankle immediately swelled and became painful. Twelve days after the accident an incision was made, and X -ra y pictures taken showed a condition o f sarcoma with rarefaction o f the bone. A fte r several operations fo r the purpose o f removing the tumorous growth, about three months after the acci dent the leg was amputated, but the sarcoma continued to develop, resulting in metastasis which caused death eight months after the accident. A w ard was made fo r the fu ll death benefit. (Schneider v. Norton Bros., 4 I. A . C* Dec. 382.) S A R C O M A O F C L A V IC L E . A n employee, who had worked steadily fo r years, fell a short dis tance from a platform on which he was working and struck the point o f his left shoulder. A lump appeared on the inner third o f the left collar bone, which he claimed he noticed immediately after his injury, and which, five weeks later, was decided by physicians to be a sarcoma o f slow progression. A lthough the medical testimony was both hypothetical and conflicting, it was held that there was a reason able preponderance o f likelihood that the disability due to the sarcoma was proximately caused by the injury, and an award for compen sation and necessary medical treatment was made in favor o f the applicant. This case was taken to the appellate court and later on to the supreme court and the award affirmed by both higher tribunals. (V illa v. Santa Ana Sugar Co., 4 I. A . C. Dec. 147.) This man fell about 12 feet and struck on his right arm and shoulder; was in the hospital about tw o months. X -ra y plates taken 180 MEDICAL- SESSION. about two months after the accident showed evidence o f sarcoma o f the articular surface o f scapula neck and acromion process, and outer end o f clavicle^ all being involved. X -ra y j^iates taken at the time o f the injury showed the same to a lesser degree. The arm was ampu tated at the shoulder. A w ard made in favor o f applicant. (Farley v. Hughes, No. 3426, M ay 24, 1917.) IN S A N IT Y . T o many this is the most fascinating medical question presented in compensation practice and frequently the most obscure. The .situation is complicated by the existence o f various distinct types o f mental derangement, each o f which depends upon different princi ples. In many cases, as in paresis, the distinction between aggra vation and preexisting condition and proximate cause o f insanity becomes lost, and these two issues become inextricably intermingled. The follow in g cases com ing before our commission are classified ac cording to types o f insanity: A. M a n ia c a l T ype, H y s t e r ic a l or D e p r e s s iv e . An employee lost his finger while w orking on an oil well, and three days later became mentally deranged, being noisy, maniacal, and manifested hysterical symptoms and other abnormalities. H e had been mentally unbalanced five years before fo r a period o f 10 months, but w^as at the time o f the accident normal. There was no prior history o f venereal or other constitutional disease. I t was held that his insanity was precipitated and proximately caused by his injury, the commission stating as follow s in its opinion: “ In the case before the commission we see a healthy and apparently a normal workman suddenly suffer an accidental injury which takes him from the ranks o f producing labor and renders him helpless, incapable, and a charge upon his fam ily. The chain o f events from the instant he was injured to the time-he became mentally deranged is unbroken. W e can not see and we can not say that any new act intervened originating the applicant’s mental condition. The testi mony and investigations we have made convince us to the contrary (H ayes v. Standard Oil Co., 1 I. A . C. Dec. 219.) A n employee was present and witnessed an accident which caused the death o f two o f his fellow employees. H e became unbalanced immediately, suffering from mental and emotional shock and excite ment. His mental condition was diagnosed as a previous hysteria with maniacal manifestations in the earlier stages, and compensation was allowed. (R e ic h v. City o f Im perial, 1 I. A. C. Dec. 337.) D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO PR E E XIST IN G DISEASE---- M . LIS SN E R . 181 A n employee sustained a double hernia due to injury and was later operated upon fo r its cure. Nine days after, he commenced to show signs o f restlessness and nervousness which later developed into a violent mania* H e was removed to a State insane hospital and died there about 5 months later. It was claimed that the insanity and subsequent death were caused by the shock o f the accident and o f the operation or o f the anesthetic employed. The preponderance o f medical testimony showed that death was probably due to an acute condition contracted in the insane hospital and not directly to the insanity, and further that the lapse o f time from the accident and operation to the first manifestation o f insane symptoms was such as to prevent the shock o f the accident and operation from having upset his mental equilibrium. Compensation was accordingly allowed only fo r the disability due to the hernia and physical disability follow ing the operation. (K ato v. Guardian Casualty Co., 8 I. A . C. Dec. 333.) B. P a r e s is . A n employee fell from the top o f a straw stack 20 feet to the ground, the fall causing a slight concussion o f the brain. H e was sent to a hospital fo r 17 days and then returned to his home. U pon arriving home he complained o f paralysis and other symptoms and becoming worse was sent to the hospital for the insane, where his condition was diagnosed as paresis, or general paralysis, this con dition being o f syphilitic origin. The commission found that the effect o f the accident upon his mental balance was not sufficient to constitute the proximate cause o f the development o f the insanity, and denied compensation except fo r the immediate physical conse quence o f the fall. (Hanson v. Frankfort General Insurance Co., 2 I. A . C. Dec. 767.) A pplicant, employed as a farm laborer, while driving a team under a projecting roof, struck his head on a rafter and was knocked to the ground. A few days later he began to develop symptoms diag nosed as traumatic neurasthenia. I t was also found that he was suffering from syphilitic infection, latent before the injury and probably lighted up thereby. A n award was made for a temporary partial disability. Later on it was shown that the physiological and anatomical effects o f the injury had totally disappeared, that the then existing symptoms were due entirely to the syphilitic infection and were those o f the pseudoneurasthenia complex characteristic o f the period antecedent to true leuetic paresis, due entirely to the syphilitic infection and not to the injury. The defendants were accordingly discharged. (Christensen v. Bra vender, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 527.) 182 M E D IC A L SESSION. C. T r a u m a t ic I n s a n it y . T his class o f cases occurs where an employee has sustained athead injury, principally where the skull is fractured, causing damage to the brain which produces insanity. In this case the right to compen sation is clear i f the medical testimony sufficiently connects the dam age with the mental derangement. A laundry-wagon driver was kicked by his horse, sustaining a fractured skull. H e was unconscious fo r several weeks afterwards and slowly recovered, returning to w ork in about three months. Nearly a year after his accident he had seizures o f some sort, prob ably epileptic, although he had never been subject to epileptic fits or seizures before the accident. F o r some time before the seizures he had noted occasional dizzy spells and during the remainder o f his life, which was nearly a year after the first seizure, he had other seizures o f less violence. D uring the last few months his intelligence became affected and he was unable to continue at work. 'H is case was diagnosed by several neurologists as one o f m ajor hysteria and traumatic neurosis, without any organic brain injury, but one expert neurologist gave it as his opinion that the employee was suffering from definite brain injury, traumatic epilepsy, and the probable be ginning o f dementia. The employee died from acute appendicitis, and upon autopsy, necrosed portions o f the brain were found suffi cient to account fo r his symptoms. The commission allowed tem po rary total indemnity up to the time o f his death, terminating com pensation at that time as the death was not due to the injury. (B ald w in v. Western Indem nity Co., Sept. 14, 1917 [not reported].) A lineman in the employment o f an electrical railway company fell from the top o f a line wagon to the street, fracturing his skull. H e remained unconscious fo r a time and later was able to be about. X -r a y examination about six months later showed a pronounced thickening o f the inner table o f the skull, about certain sutures. H e complained principally, after the immediate effects o f the accident had subsided, o f sleeplessness and occasional violent outburst o f temper without apparent reason, maniacal spells, but not sufficiently definite to enable the condition to be classed as a maniacal or depres sive type. H e also had a suggestion o f petit mal epilepsy. Compen sation was awarded fo r insanity produced by a head injury and con cussion o f the brain. Some time after the award the employee was committed to the insane hospital. (Stultz v. Oakland San Fran cisco Terminal Railways, Mar. 12, 1918 [not reported].) DISLOCATED SEM ILUNAR C ARTILAGE. There is a certain type o f knee injury, known as a dislocated semilunar cartilage, whose recurrent effects cause embarrassment D ISA B IL ITY DUE TO P R E E X IST IN G DISEASE— M . LISSN E R . 183 to industrial accident boards. The first time trouble is noted by the injured employee is usually when he strains his knee suddenly, causing a dislocation o f this cartilage, im pinging in the knee joint, and causing severe pain and disability fo r some weeks. Thereafter the disability w ill gradually pass away and he w ill return to work, but forever afterwards, uliless operated upon, he remains subject to a recurrence. A n y slight strain thereafter w ill cause a new disloca tion o f the weakened joint, and indeed such dislocation is even found to occur at recurrent intervals without any trauma whatsoever. Each time the cartilage slips again disability w ill be produced for some days or weeks. W ith respect to the first occurrence, i f produced by trauma, the case is clear. The problem arises with later displacements, particu larly where the man is w orking fo r other employers. Should the second displacement be charged to the new employer, or are all sub sequent displacements proximately a result o f the original weak ening o f the joint and to be charged to the first employer, or should the employee go uncompensated fo r later displacements? Our commission in the cases o f R aggio v. R oyal Indem nity Co., 3 I. A . C. Dec. 319, Em ployers’ L iability Assurance Corporation v. R aggio, 3 I. A . C. Dec. 324, and Salyer v. Sperry Flour Co., 3 I. A. C. Dec. 321, laid down the follow in g tests: (1) The employer in whose service the first dislocation o f the knee cartilage occurs is liable fo r compensation for the temporary condition produced. (2) The employer in whose em p loy m en ts second dislocation o f the cartilage occurs, without evidence o f specific trauma at the time, is not liable for any disability ensuing, as the condition is merely a recurrence o f the fact o f the first dislocation. (3) W here evidence o f trauma at the time o f the second slipping o f the cartilage is clear and convincing, compensation will be awarded against the second employer, but only in such cases. (4 ) The only cure fo r the situation is an operation, but such operation should not, by reason o f the dangers attending it, be forced upon the injured employee as a condition precedent to receiv ing compensation fo r his injury. The expense o f the operation should be borne by the first employer. (5) W here an operation is advised by competent surgeons, the first employer should be required to tender it, leaving the injured man free to elect whether or not to submit himself to it. I f he declines the operation, the employer should be discharged from all further liability after the immediate temporary disability is passed and not be held liable fo r future recurrences. 184 M ED ICAL SESSION. DISEASES AND IN D U STRIA L INJURIES. F ollow ing is an analysis o f the commission’s disposition o f claims arising out o f 118 cases o f diseases and industrial injuries, from January 1, 1917, to June 30, 1918: Diseases. Claims Claims denied granted by com by com mission. mission. 1 Arthritis . . . . . . . . . . D o..................... Carcinoma.............. Gonorrhea.............. Heart trouble..."__ D o..................... Hemorrhoids.......... Hernia of appendix. H ydrocele............... Meningitis. . . __ Orchitis. . . . . . . . . __ Paralysis................. D o...........„........ P n e u m o n ia ........... Do ................ Rheum atism . . . . __ D o..................... Sarcoma............... Sacroiliac s lip ........ Syphilis__. . . ____ Do ....... T enosynovitis... . . . Tuberculosis.. . . . . . D o..................... Varicocele . . . . . . __ D o..................... Varicose ulcer......... Varicose veins......... 15 Total............. 60 2 2 1 1 3 4 3 4 6 5 1 10 2 Statute of limi tations inter fered. 2 1 1 Remarks. N ot due to employment. Insufficient evidence to establish claim. 'N o t in course of employment. 1 2 2 N ot due to employment. N ot in course of employm ent nor result of injury. N ot result of injury. 7 N ot due to employment. 1 1 N ot caused by employment. Do. 2 N ot due to employm ent. 6 Insufficient evidence and not result of injury. Do. 9 7 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 55 N ot due to employment. N o t due to injury or employment. Evidence insufficient. Disability not result of injury. Do. 3 H O W M E D IC A L Q U E S T IO N S A R E H A N D L E D U N D E R T H E W O R K M E N ’ S C O M P E N S A T IO N A C T IN T H E S T A T E O F W A S H IN G T O N . BY J. W . BRISLAWN, INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF WASHINGTON. M edical problems arising under the W ashington plan o f work men’s compensation are handled through the medical department o f the Industrial Insurance Commission. The Industrial Insurance Com mission, which administers the workmen’s compensation act, consists o f three members appointed by the governor. The medical depart ment o f the Industrial Insurance Commission consists o f a chief medi cal adviser and an assistant medical adviser, appointed by the com mission, who devote all o f their time to the work. Under our law each claim for compensation is based on three re ports to the com m ission: r (1) The workman’s claim ; (2) the em ployer’s report; (3) the report o f the attending physician. Every physician in the State o f W ashington attending an injured work man is required to make a report o f the case to the industrial insur ance commission. Blank form s fo r this report are furnished every regularly licensed physician in the State. The rules o f the commis sion require the attending physician to make the report within a reasonable time. Thus each practicing physician who gives medical attention to injured workmen becomes in a sense an assistant to the medical department o f the commission. The attending physician may be called upon by the commission, or its medical department, fo r other and additional inform ation than that required in the first re port. The attending physician is required to report the condition o f the injured workman during each month o f his disability. In every case the report o f the attending physician is submitted to our medical department fo r approval or rejection o f the claim from a medical point o f view. The action o f the medical department is not final and conclusive so far as the fate o f a particular claim is con cerned, but is always subject to final action by the commission. In border line cases, where the medical profession is in doubt as to whether or not the claimant’s condition has resulted from his injury, the commission is prone to give the benefit o f the doubt to the claimant. Special medical examiners are appointed by the commission to ex amine such claimants as are too far distant from the office of the commission at Olympia to make it possible for them to report there 185 186 MEDICAL, SESSIOIT. fo r special examination. Specialists in nervous diseases, eye and ear specialists, and specialists in bone work are appointed by the commission from time to time to examine such claimants as we are unable to have examined by our own department, or whose cases require a more thorough examination than the ordinary practitioner is prepared to make. Wasserman reactions and tuberculin tests are made for the commission in the laboratory maintained by the State Department o f Public Health. W e may also appoint a special ex aminer outside o f the State to examine any claimant who has re moved from our State before his case has been finally closed. W hen we find an examiner who writes a good special report, and whose findings are reasonably reliable, we try to use him in all our cases in his locality, fo r the reason that this means uniform ity in the handling o f cases, and after having done this work for us fo r some time he usually becomes more skilled and gives us more definite in form ation on which to rate the cases. Under the law, as amended by the legislature o f 1917, the com mission pays the traveling expenses o f any claimant ordered up for special medical examination. This enables us to bring many more claimants to our Olym pia office fo r examination than heretofore and has resulted in much more satisfactory settlements in difficult or dis puted cases than it was possible to make prior to the amendment o f the law. This has greatly increased the work o f our medical de partment but the results amply ju stify the increased labor. A s an adjunct to our medical department we have two or three claim adjusters who have been trained for the work but who are not physicians. These men cover the entire State and meet the claim ants at convenient places, settling such claims as can be settled with out special medical examination. Their reports— adjustments— are forw arded to the medical department o f the commission and either approved fo r final settlement o f the claim or the claimant is then ordered to appear before a physician fo r medical examination. P rior to 1917 the Industrial Insurance Commission was charged with the duty o f supervising the medical and hospital treatment o f injured workmen, to the extent o f seeing that such treatment was suitable and wholesome. In 1917 the law was amended, and there w^as created a State medical aid department, o f which the chief medi cal adviser o f the Industrial Insurance Commission was made, ex officio, a member and chairman o f the b o a rd ; two other members, one an employer and the other a representative o f labor, were to be ap|)ointed by the governor. This board, known as the “ State medical aid board ” is now charged with the duty o f supervising medical and hospital treatment o f injured workmen. The medical aid act provides two plans under which injured work men may receive medical and hospital treatment, the first being M ED ICAL Q U ESTIO N S, IN W A S H IN G T O N — J . W . B R IS L A W N . 187 known as the 64 State plan,” under which plan funds contributed by the workmen and the employers o f the State are paid into the State medical aid fu n d ; the workman chooses his own physician and his own hospital; the employer furnishes transportation for the injured workman to the place o f treatment, and the medical bills, hospital bills, and drug bills are paid out o f the State fund upon approval o f such bills by the State medical aid board certified to the industrial insurance commission, which commission orders the payments made. The other plan provided is the “ contract p la n ” under which the employer, with the consent o f not less than 50 per cent o f his work men, may enter into a contract fo r medical and hospital care o f such men as are injured, in which case only 10 per cent o f the amount paid by the workmen and the employed so contracting is paid into the State medical aid fund, the remaining 90 per cent being paid to the doctor or hospital holding such contract. In either case, however, whether under the State plan or the contract plan, the State medical aid board has supervision o f the treatment. This ties the whole sub ject o f medical and hospital treatment o f injured workmen to the medical department o f the industrial insurance commission. The Industrial Insurance Commission has the power, under the law, to prescribe rules and regulations concerning reports o f physicians and to require claimants to submit to medical examinations from time to time, and in conjunction with the medical aid board, to determine whether or not the treatment that injured workmen are receiving is suitable and wholesome. It is enabled to do this to its own satisfac tion and to the benefit o f the injured workman by reason o f having constantly the services o f its medical department. A ctin g under the advice o f its medical adviser the commission adopted rules concern ing hernia cases. TJnder the hernia rules i f an operation is advisable and w ill relieve the condition, the commission orders the operation. I f the claimant refuses to be operated on all payments are suspended until he does submit to an operation. The same is true concerning operations fo r almost any industrial injury where relief may be obtained by a reasonable operation. W hile new problems are constantly occurring it is worthy o f note that hundreds o f injuries are similar in character, will yield to simi lar treatment, and will result in about the same degree o f temporary or permanent disability, as the case may be. Careful observation o f such cases by our medical department enables us to determine a reas onable duration o f time loss and to rate such disabilities as result from like cases in a reasonably uniform manner. W e find many injuries occurring that are not classified in the act and that result in no definite permanent partial disability, such as when an amputation follow s an injury. I refer to such injuries as fractures o f the skull where no operation is required or where a depression o f the outer 188 M ED ICAL SESSION. table may occur. W here the final outcome is doubtful we endeavor to rate such resulting disabilities in the light o f the experience that the department has had and in conform ity with a uniform schedule. It might be proper to say that under the W ashington act, as ad ministered by the commission, we attempt to settle our medical prob lems according to the best medical advice that we can obtain. W e believe that by having the services o f our own medical men, supple mented by such further advice and consultation as they desire, or as the commission may require, we get fairly uniform results and ad minister the law as equitably between the injured workman and the employer who pays the bills as it is possible to do. I t should be remembered, however, that many o f the injured work men are never seen by our chief medical adviser, or his assistant, and, therefore, their skill and knowledge o f such matters is put to the most severe test in determining the condition o f the claimant and the degree o f his disability from the report o f attending physician or special examiner. W e feel, however, that this can be determined more accurately by having a department w orking in conjunction with the Industrial Insurance Commission than it could be i f we were solely dependent upon the attending physician or special examiner fo r medical advice in each case. H O W M E D IC A L Q U E S T IO N S A R E H A N D L E D U N D E R C O M P E N S A T IO N A C T IN M A S S A C H U S E T T S . BY WILLIAM W. KENNARD, CHAIRMAN, MASSACHUSETTS INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD. The compensation act o f Massachusetts, Part V , section 9, provides that the Industrial Accident Board may appoint a medical adviser. This act went into effect in 1914, since which time the office o f medical adviser to our board has been most ably and efficiently filled by Dr* Francis D. Donoghue, o f Boston. In his department are handled in the first instance the medical questions which arise in any given case. Under our act, “ A fter an employee has received an injury, and from time to time thereafter during the continuance o f his disability he shall, i f so requested by the association or subscriber, submit himself to an examination by a physician or surgeon authorized to practice medi cine under the laws o f the Commonwealth, furnished and paid fo r by the association or subscriber. The employee^ shall have the right to have a physician provided and paid fo r by himself present at the examination. I f he refuses to submit himself fo r the examination, or in any way obstructs the same, his right to compensation shall be suspended, and his compensation during the period o f suspension may be forfeited.” Under another section o f the act it is provided that “ The Indus trial Accident B oard or any member thereof may appoint a duly qualified impartial physician to examine the injured employee and to report. The fee fo r this service shall be $5 and traveling expenses, but the board may allow additional reasonable amounts in extraordi nary cases, and the association shall reimburse the board for the amount so paid. The report o f the physician shall be admissible as evidence in any proceeding before the Industrial Accident Board or a committee o f arbitration, provided that the employee and insurer have seasonably been furnished with copies thereof.” In practice the Industrial Accident Board of Massachusetts avails itself, in almost every disputed case, of the provisions of the latter section; that is, an impartial examination is made and an impartial reports is filed. This may be done as a result of a conference; it may be done as a result of the suggestion of the medical adviser in con sultation with the member of the board who has had to do with the case; it may be done during a conference or hearing, or if the result of a conference or hearing is such that in the opinion of the sitting 189 190 M E D IC A L SESSION. member he will be aided and assisted in a just determination o f the question before him by a report from some impartial examiner. In all other respects medical questions which come before the board are handled as in a court o f law. Both parties, the employee and the insurer, can present at the hearing the testimony o f attend ing physicians, hospital records, or experts, and such evidence is received in the same way and manner as all other evidence having to 4 o with the proving or disproving o f the claimant’s case. In prac tice, as may be imagined, the report o f an impartial examiner is entitled to and receives great weight in the ordinary case. The im partial examiner is chosen, and the case sent to him because he is a specialist in the particular line o f work which is presented by the particular case which he examines. These impartial physicians have been picked out with the advice of, and after consultation with, our medical department, in various parts o f the Commonwealth. Their reports, as are indicated by the statute, are made in w riting along certain prescribed lines tending to best meet the needs o f a hearing. In many cases it is deemed advisable on the part o f the sitting mem ber, or more often by one o f the parties, to submit both the written report and the oral testimony o f the impartial examiner. In the latter case the party desiring his presence makes a request o f our board, and the impartial examiner, i f it is the judgment o f the board that such evidence is properly asked for, is then requested through the medical department to be present at the hearing. A t this time he is subject to examination by either o f the parties on matters perti nent to the case. A t no stage o f the proceedings, up to the time he takes the witness stand, is the impartial examiner permitted to be interrogated by either party to the controversy, it being the pur pose o f the act, which purpose we believe has been accomplished, to make him all that the term u impartial ” implies. In addition to the impartial physicians located throughout the State, each day there is in attendance at the board rooms a ph}7sician who can be, and is, called upon to examine cases inform ally fo r guidance in conference matters, and form ally with a written report to be used fo r hearing purposes. A s w ill be noted, from the statute, the expense o f the impartial physician, both fo r examination and testifying, is made a charge against the insurer, but his fee is not paid direct by the insurer, but an account is rendered by our medical department to the insurer which pays the money into the Common wealth and the Commonwealth, through the treasurer’s department, disburses it in accordance with the accounts rendex^ed to him by our medical department. Since December 1, 1917, the beginning o f our fiscal year, to September 1, 1918, a period o f 10 months, there has been so paid fo r impartial examinations the sum o f $18,889.62, an average o f about $1,550 a month. M E D IC A L Q U E STIO N S, IN M A SSA C H U SE TT S---- W M , W . K E N N A R D . 191 It should perhaps be stated at this point, if it should not have come earlier in these remarks, that when the parties are not able to get together themselves, or at an inform al conference, that under the Massachusetts law, a form al hearing is held, at which both parties are ordinarily represented by counsel, and testimony is taken and received in accordance with regular court procedure and also in ac cordance with the ordinary rules o f evidence prevailing in any court trial, with the result that some cases will run for two or three days, the time being given up entirely to medical testimony from various experts presented by both parties. The provision o f the statute quoted with reference to examination o f the injured man by the insurer, makes it possible fo r the insurer to go fully into the medical side o f the case with his experts. The employee, generally unable to pay the expense o f high priced expert testimony, is, through the system o f impartial examination, amply protected in his rights, the impartial examiner being, as before stated, a man especially skilled with the problems o f the particular class o f cases o f which the subject case is a part, and ordinarily a man who, by reason o f that fact, is amply able to present his views upon the witness stand when called upon to do so. I haven’t attempted in these few remarks to go into the question o f medical treatment and all the other aspects o f the medical prob lem, having in mind, upon an examination o f the program, that to do so would be going beyond the scope o f our question, encroaching upon the ground which w ill be covered by other papers. H O W M E D IC A L Q U E S T IO N S A R E H A N D L E D U N D E R C O M P E N S A T IO N L A W IN N E W Y O R K S T A T E . BY WILLIAM C. ARCHER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN CHARGE OF NEW YORK STATE BUREAU OF WORKMEN’ S COMPENSATION. W hat are medical questions? Does the question refer to the organization o f the medical division within the bureau or department? Or does it refer to the selection o f physicians and the method o f treatment with such attendant ques tions as who shall provide the treatment, etc.? Or does it refer in a larger sense to the relation o f the medical question to the whole matter o f workmen’s compensation? These all stand up in plain view when the subject o f these remarks is announced. But the program o f this session when read with the entire medical program would seem to lim it the medical question to the first refer ence above and I may say perhaps the least interesting. In the New Y ork jurisdiction there is a large claims office in New Y ork City to which is attached the principal office o f the medical division and where is stationed our chief medical examiner. There are also claims offices in four other cities. In New Y ork there is the equivalent o f 12 fu ll daily sessions a week engaged in hearing claims. In the other cities there is one fu ll day’s hearing a week with numerous other cases heard on notice. Each o f these latter cities is also the center o f a circuit which is visited periodically by deputy commissioners who hear cases. Each o f the latter at each place o f hearing has available medical advice. The medical division is in charge o f a chief medical examiner whose duties embrace the follow in g : T o examine claimants; to be present at hearings where medical testimony is taken, either as an examiner o f medical witnesses, as medical counsel to the sitting com missioners, or as witness whose opinions are subject to cross-exam ination ; to review cases and to make written reports on the medical phases thereof; to be present at conferences o f physicians in the examination o f claim ants; and to outline and control the work o f his medical and clerical staff. W ith never-ending hearings the medical office in New Y ork City is a busy p lace; for, as soon as it appears to the sitting commissioner that a medical report is desirable, the proceedings are interrupted and the claimant is sent at once to the medical division fo r an exam ination. In the course o f a few minutes the case is returned with a complete report, whereupon it is again called and disposed of. 192 M ED ICAL Q U E ST IO N S, IN N E W Y ORK STATE---- W . C. ARCH ER. : 193 That this is an advantageous arrangement goes without saying. I t enables us quickly to dispose o f a large number o f cases and greatly to diminish the time consumed in the disposition o f the case. It also permits o f numerous adjournments in a given case and the ability o f the bureau to follow it from week to week or month to month, keeping in close and accurate touch with it. O f course, it is recognized that a large city and cheap transportation make this .possible. But the practice in effect is quite the same in the smaller cities where an available physician is always at hand. There is also the element o f impartiality, which is recognized by all parties, our medical division being guided only by a sense o f truth and justice and not interested fo r or against either claimant or insurance com pany. O f course, prim ary requisites on the part o f the medical di vision are ability and fairness. In New Y ork City alone 15,000 examinations were made last year. T his gives an idea o f the amount o f work done. Every report is recorded and made easy o f access through a card system o f filing. A copy o f the report is also filed with the other papers in the case and thus made easily accessible to the claim examiners or sitting commissioner. In New Y ork, besides the cases which are noticed fo r public hearing, there are many cases in which compensation is paid and received by employers and claimants and which are certified to the commission on join t reports o f agreements. The law requires that these agreements shall provide full statutory compensation and makes it a duty o f the commission to investigate the cases to see that agreements have been made strictly according to law. T o aid in this investigation, notices are sent to claimants to present themselves for medical examination i f they lack knowledge o f the terms o f the law or fo r any other reason they are doubtful that they have received adequate compensation. This brings thousands o f claimants to the office o f the commission and most o f them go through the medical division, where they are examined and reported on in the manner outlined above. This safeguards the enforcement o f the provisions o f the law and again demonstrates the utility o f a well organized medical division. It is also the function o f the medical division to make arrangements fo r all specialists’ examinations such as neurologists, oculists, etc. The insurance carriers invariably pay fo r such examinations but the examiner is selected by the medical division independent o f the knowledge o f any party in interest. This, in brief, is the manner in which medical questions are han dled in New York. There are a number o f great problems in compensation matters such as extent o f coverage, manner o f insurance, benefits, rates, ad1242470—19------13 194 M ED ICAL SESSION. ministration, including problems o f organization and finality in the disposition o f claims, accident prevention, and the medical question. The last has its relative importance, which is always large. Injured workmen should have voluntary recourse to a clinic o f undoubted skill and ability; they should be induced by every proper incentive to submit themselves immediately after injury to adequate treat m ent; their cases should immediately come under the attention o f the State, and be held there until a permanent determination o f the disability is arrived a t ; they should have this medical attention with out cost to them other than the great underlying cost whose prom i nent share they are indirectly paying. Thfe State should also be able to command directly the testimony o f the physicians under a plan in which the physicians would not be tempted to be witnesses except for the truth. In addition to this, the administrative commission should have at its command ar thoroughly equipped staff o f physicians, and in this connection it is safe to say that every State in the Union should have at its service a larger staff than it is now able to command. The physicians com posing the staff should be o f such well recognized ability that they m ight well be the final arbiters o f all medical ques tions raised. So much, in brief, on a phase o f the compensation question with out lim it in importance or interest. THE NEED OF MEDICAL STATISTICS FOR COMPENSATION PURPOSES. BY F. H . THOMPSON, M . D., CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER, OREGON INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION. N o compensation board has a complete organization without a statistical department, as such inform ation as is gained from the gathering and presentation o f statistical data is essential fo r effective service. Compensation statistics have tw o important functions: First, such statistics give definite inform ation as to the method o f treatment offering the most uniform success to the industrial sur geon. F or instance, it has been shown that in ununited fractures autogenous bone g ra ft causes early union with no latent aftereffects, the least amount o f callus (in excess), and no later operation, such as is the case with the use o f plates, nails, etc., which must be re moved. Femur fractures vary according ta location, character, and extent o f soft tissue trauma. Only by reviewing the records o f hun dreds o f cases has treatment o f this bone been so perfected that the injured workman can have the benefit o f real scientific care, with the expectation that the ultimate result w ill be satisfactory and the amount o f shortening the minimum. The insuring to an injured workman o f the best surgical care is made possible only by carefully compiled statistics, from a study o f which adequate conclusions can be drawn. As regards the care o f wounds or any other abnormal condition, statistics are just as valuable. To-day a palmar or tendonitis abcess would not be poulticed and allowed to “ head ” while infection was traveling up the arm, doing irreparable damage and menacing life. The infected area would be drained at such a point as would leave the least disability from scar tissue form ation and adhesions. Real surgical science has, like every other science, grown by slow process o f profiting by mistakes and o f perfecting technique along lines that have proven successful. Case histories, which are statistics o f the best sort, have been kept— the only means by which progress is possible. Second, statistical computation enables the accident board to ar rive more accurately at the relative hazard o f any occupation. This is o f the utmost importance in properly estimating liability, fixing adequate rates to cover the hazard, and estimating the proper time 195 196 M E D IC A L SESSION. loss. It is especially important as to the fixing o f rates, as it would be obviously unfair to have one arbitrary rate that would apply to all types o f hazardous work. It would be impossible to arrive at an equitable rate without knowing the hazard o f the particular industry, which can be ascertained only from accurate statistics. I t has been found that the accident experience o f steel-ship yards is greater in frequency, but less in severity, than in wTooden-ship yards, and that it is higher in loggin g than in commercial transfer wTork. So by proper com pilation o f actual accident experience ac cident boards are enabled to arrive at definite, equitable rates for the various industries and at the same time to so grade the rate as to cover the liability o f the hazard. This one point should be borne in mind, however, that in study ing statistics fo r the estimation o f time loss due to any given type o f accident, the model averages are the averages ordinarily made and should be the standard. F or instance, in nine cases o f fracture o f the tibia one case may be unusually severe and give a disability period o f nine months; one may be slight, with a temporary total time loss o f one m onth; five may last practically three months; one may last four months, and one five months. Evidently for these figures three is the mode, and should be taken as the ordinary time loss in estimating liability, instead o f the average secured by adding and by dividing by the number o f cases, which would give 3 f months time loss per case, a period which would be too long. F or these reasons statistics are vitally necessary for industrial, surgical, and compensation purposes. T H U R S D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 26— E V E N IN G S E S S IO N . CHAIRMAN, F. D. DONOGHUE, M. D., MASSACHUSETTS. S E L E C T IO N O F T H E P H Y S IC IA N U N D E R C O M P E N S A T IO N L A W S . BY JOHN W. MOWELL, M. D., MEDICAL ADVISER TO THE INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COM MISSION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE MEDICAL AID BOARD. The selection o f a physician under compensation laws depends largely upon the law itself; so what I have to say will be from the standpoint o f the compensation law o f the State o f W ashington and it resolves itself into the follow in g : First. The free choice o f physician by the injured workman. Second. The selection o f a physician by the employer, after se curing the consent o f his workmen to contract for their care. Third. The selection o f the physician fo r special work, by the industrial insurance commission through the medical aid board. Under what is knowTn in our State as the “ State plan” the law grants the workman the privilege o f selecting his own physician in case o f injury, provided he resides within a reasonable distance from the injured workman. W hile this plan seems quite equitable and it appears to be the natural thing to do, it has a good many short comings. F or instance, to the isolated workman who is employed in a locality where there are only one or two physicians, free choice means little, and the injured workman has to accept the services o f the first physician he can obtain. However, in the larger cities where there is a great number o f physicians we find that some o f the work men make a wise choice, while quite a large per cent o f them, fo r some reason or other, select a physician who is not very well equipped fo r the work at hand. W e often find that a workman who has received a serious fracture w ill select a physician who knows little about fractures; also a man who receives an injury to his eyes may go to an ordinary practitioner fo r treatment until the serious nature o f the case makes it necessary to transfer him to an eye specialist, whom he should have consulted in the first instance. This occurs more or less with reference to all kinds o f injuries. W e have seen numerous times, and once within the last month, a workman who had received a Colie’s fracture, that had never been badly displaced, but had been treated by a long an terior and posterior splint extending over the fingers. The splints 197 198 M E D IC A L SESSION. were retained tw o months. This man was past middle age, and not only his arm but his entire hand was so disabled that it was practi cally useless, due not to the fracture but to the manner in which it was handled. H is condition is such that he w ill have a practically useless arm and hand the rest o f his life. W e have also seen numerous P o tt’s fractures that were treated by physicians who were not well up in handling this particular frac ture, and did not appreciate the final results that are so apt to fo l low. The claimants are disabled from lack o f proper alignment and left in a seriously crippled condition. Since surgeons learn largely from experience in handling these cases, the surgeon who handles few may entirely fail to appreciate the condition that he is dealing with and trust too much to chance, and after it is too late to remedy the condition he finds that he has been quite shortsighted. T o my mind the principal thing that can be said in favor o f free choice o f physician by the injured workman is the effect that it has on his mind, that is, the feeling that he is getting what he wants. Under the contract plan we have a good deal o f the same condi tions to contend with, since in isolated districts it is impossible to keep a physician in the locality under the “ Free choice plan,” so same physician, and very often the man with very little experience, locates in the district and contracts with the employer fo r the care o f his workmen, on a monthly payment basis, so that he may be able to maintain himself in that location. H e proceeds to handle everything that may follow , to the m isfortune o f the workmen, and gets his ex perience, sometimes, at the expense o f the workmen and employer. I f he is a close observer his work w ill improve, as it is largely along one line. In the larger industrial centers some o f the contract men are very efficient “ business getters ” and obtain their contracts largely from enterprise in that direction. They must, however, give service equal to any that can be given in the district, or they are not able to retain their contracts. This they do either by becoming quite efficient themselves or by associating themselves with some surgeon who is well equipped to do the work. The medical aid board also has this check with reference to contract work, that it must be satisfied that the surgeon who is taking the contract is able to give the men as good service as they can get in that locality. The same rule holds good in the isolated districts. There is one unfortunate feature o f the contract plan that has given and is at present givin g the State medical aid board considerable trouble. It is the com m ercializing o f the contract plan by nonmedi cal men who form a hospital association and then go to the employer SELECTIO N OF P H Y S IC IA N ---- J O H N W . MO W E L L , M . D. 199 and employees and by offering them some special inducement get the signatures o f the workmen, giving their consent to the employer to make a contract fo r their care. Then they secure the services o f a surgeon and pay a small part o f the proceeds to him fo r the work and keep the remainder. This has brought about a lot o f dissatisfac tion among the workmen and the physicians o f the State, causing some agitation at the present time toward State hospitals for the care o f workmen under the industrial act. Under the head o f “ Selection o f surgeon fo r special work,” the medical aid board requires, by rule, that where a contracting surgeon is not able to do the work personally he must furnish the services o f a specialist. Under free choice o f physician the medical aid board, by rule, reserves the right to transfer a man fo r treatment to a surgeon o f its choice where it becomes evident that the injured workman is not receiving the service that he should at the hands o f the physician o f his choice. In m aking this selection the board is guided entirely by its knowledge o f the various kinds o f work that the different sur geons o f the State are best fitted to do. This knowledge is based on seven years* observation o f the work done by the physicians in the State. In conclusion, I would like to say. that fo r the ordinary accident I feel that the workman should have “ free choice o f physician,” but in more serious accidents it would be much better if he would take the advice o f some one who is in a position to know what physician is best equipped by experience or otherwise to treat the particular condition from which he is suffering. In this way the permanent partial disabilities resulting would be fewer and the injured man would be left in better shape to take up a gainful oc cupation, fo r the disability awards, although as liberal as under any compensation act, are not in keeping with what the workman loses. SELECTION OF THE PHYSICIAN IN COMPENSATION CASES. B Y R A P H A E L L E W Y , M . D ., C H IE F M E D IC A L E X A M IN E R , N E W Y O R K ST A T E IN D U S T R IA L C O M M IS S IO N . [This paper was submitted but not read.] The selection o f the physician to treat workmen’s compensation cases is a problem o f some moment, and one that must be regarded from various points o f view. It is obvious, at the outset, that the se lection o f the physician by either party— the claimant or the insur ance carrier— is accompanied by both advantages and disadvantages. I f the physician is selected by the insurance carrier, it may be pre sumed that the carrier is in a position to select a skilled attendant, w h o will give the claimant adequate care, but it must also be remembered that the carrier is vitally interested in shortening the period o f disa bility as greatly as possible. This may sometimes result in disad vantage to the injured person, as he may be pronounced cured or be yond need o f further attention, or beyond the possibility o f further improvement, when he still honestly believes him self to be suffering or not entirely cured. I f the selection o f the physician is left to the injured person, it must be remembered that there is the advantage that the claimant is more likely t'o experience mental satisfaction by having his own wTay. There is also the element o f so-called confidence in the physi cian o f his choice. I f he selects his own fam ily physician, however, the doctor may not be specially qualified to treat injuries or com plicated surgical sequelae, or i f the claimant selects some one else, he may not be properly guided by good advice in his selection, and his own experience in such matters is necessarily limited. There is also the element o f human nature to be taken into consideration that treatment may sometimes be unnecessarily prolonged, or that the physician may tend to m agnify the claimant’s case. Even i f we assume, as we should, that the claimant w ill honestly select a competent physician who w ill adequately treat him and relieve him o f his suffering and injury at the earliest possible m o ment, it should be understood that the commission shall have the power to refer the claimant to another physician for more competent or specialized treatment when it is apparent to the commission that the claimant is no longer receiving skillful or careful treatment. The ideal plan would be to leave the choice in the hands o f neither carrier nor claimant, but entirely in the discretion o f the compensa tion commission, at the recommendation o f the medical department. This plan may be presumed to be impartial, fair to both parties, en tirely disinterested, and to result, as a general rule, in the selection o f competent medical assistance. 200 F R I D A Y , S E P T E M B E R 27— M O R N I N G S E S S IO N . CH AIR M AN, FRED M. W IL C O X , PRESIDENT, I. A . I. A . B. C. V, REHABILITATION. H O W T O D E A L W IT H C R IP P L E D W O R K E R S . B Y T . N O R M A N D EAN , S T A T IS T IC IA N , W O R K M E N ’ S C O M P E N S A T IO N BOARD OF O N T ARIO . Terms, especially when used in m ajor premises, require somewhat careful definition. W herefore, the follow in g : A “ w ork er” is one who functions in society according as he uses the fu ll measure o f his physical and mental capabilities; when he has lost some part o f those capacities he becomes a cripple. The distinction between a handi capped and a crippled worker is that the handicapped man has lost either actual or potential power, while the cripple has lost only actual power— something which he already possessed. The limitation thus placed in defining crippled workers so operates as to set apart those whose power o f social functioning has been lessened by purely exo genous forces. These forces are disease, war, and accidents, accidents being easily divisible into those the result o f the public hazard and those the result o f industrial employment. Cripples also readily di vide into two main g rou p s: Those who are able to pursue their form er occupations and those who are unable to do so. This is perhaps the true measure o f incapacity from the social side, fo r i f a cripple can engage in his prior occupation and successfully meet the competition o f nondisabled workers he is able to produce as much or nearly as much as formerly. It does not seem possible to hazard an estimate o f the number o f cripples, irrespective o f cause, in the United States, yet to convey concretely the magnitude o f the problem an attempt has been made to deduce, conservatively, the number o f industrial cripples. W ith out delineating the bases and various assumptions made, or the in tricacies o f statistical calculation, the figure, shorn bald o f all quali fications, is 2,122,000, o f whom 600,000 have been so incapacitated as to be rendered occupationally useless. In philosophic definitions o f the State and its functions and o f democracy from the Politicus o f Aristotle to the decision o f the United States Supreme Court in Chisholm v. Georgia, throughout the labyrinth o f metaphysical content, there runs the silver cord o f national weal and individual well-being. 201 202 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . Every citizen is, as it were, a part o f the great economic machine o f his country. I f he is an efficient part he is adding to the national wealth and maintaining the social prosperity; i f he fails in his efficiency he is a dead weight that the rest o f the Nation must carry and hence lessens instead o f increasing the public resources. The sub traction o f the producing capacity o f half a m illion or so cripples is not all; there is a further incubus on the Nation o f uncrippled producers maintaining the crippled nonproducers. In a time o f national stress, when all productive elements and agencies needs must be mar shalled, the pow er o f half a m illion is not inconsiderable. Further more, when the reconstruction o f peace inevitably follow s the de struction o f war there is an accentuated loss from war cripples. The loss o f wages, and o f what wages will buy in necessities, com fort, and satisfaction, inactivity, moral as well as industrial, cheerlessness and hopelessness o f outlook and physical and mental suffering o f the cripple and changed conditions o f his dependents* are not conducive to individual well-being. The pleas fo r the adequate care o f war cripples are not specious arguments. Y et it would require an army o f over 48,000,000 con tinuously in contact with the enemy fo r a year, or o f four m illions fo r ten years, to produce the number o f industrial cripples, unable to engage in their form er occupations, alive at this instant in the United States alone. Then apart from pure sentimentalism, i f war cripples as cripples form a national problem how much more manifest is the problem o f industrial cripples. Measured in national terms, the question o f m ilitary cripples is dw arfed by the immensity o f the question o f industrial cripples, and measured in individual terms, the number o f industrial cripples is to the number o f war cripples as the sands o f the seashore are to the ships that sail the depths, fo r the future holds vistas o f industrial progress o f inconceivable magni tude and o f the total obliteration and elimination o f warfare. W ar, in its terrible intensity has galvanized a materialistic w orld into some consideration fo r human wastage. Even the unspeakable Turk and the unutterable H un have been touched. Albeit the “ Beast that walks like a man” has naught else than Hohenzollern aggrandizement and Prussian megalomania as his propelling motives. The broken wrecks returning from abroad have stirred the laggard national heart to the pulsating beats o f democracy. The call o f heroic dead comes sharp and clear. To you with falling hands we throw the torch— Be yours to hold it high. I f ye break faith with us who die, W e shall not sleep though poppies grow In Flanders fields. The torch of democracy—individual well-being and national weal. H O W TO DEAL W I T H CRIPPLED W O RK ERS---- T. N . D EAN . 203 The problem, then, is the restoration o f the producing and earning power o f cripples. The measure o f national weal is the producing power o f the citizens; the measure o f individual well-being is, in fact i f not in theory, the individual’s earning pow er; the one is the natural concomitant o f the other. The social movement specifically designated as conservation has its appropriate place in ithe economic calendar. Conservation is the development o f natural resources fo r the future, natural resources consisting o f passive resources such as land, minerals, fisheries, and waterpowers, and o f one active force, industrial man power, the only agency through which passive resources can be transposed into usable product. W ith conservation runs its twin brother, reclama tion— the utilizing o f waste. W ith all o f the passive resources and with practically every product manufactured therefrom has come the utilization o f waste. But the waste dumps o f industry still con tain the cripples o f industry “ unwept, unhonored, and unsung.” Rehabilitation is the reclamation o f cripples— the converting o f the now useless cripples into producers, thereby subserving the national weal and individual well-being. That rehabilitation is possible no longer implies consideration o f theoretical probabilities. The experience o f Canada with war cripples shows that it has been possible successfully to widen the field o f in dustrial reemployment to 176 different trades and occupations with out exhausting as yet all the opportunities. The net result is that up to June 30, 1918, 4,612 soldiers so disabled as to require reeduca tion had been approved fo r courses o f vocational treatment. Even before the war such schools as those at Charleroi, Brussels, and Tournai were doing excellent work with excellent results. Since war’s advent the belligerent nations have earnestly and diligently prose cuted endeavor and the results have been astounding. In Canada, one man with both legs off and one eye out has been taught silver polishing, soldering, and gilding, and is in receipt o f a wage o f $75 monthly. Canada is tending her war-disabled from clearing station to his last hospital better than the wounded soldier has ever been tended in any war. In special hospitals— orthopedic, phthisic, neurasthenic, blind— the medical branch o f the Department o f Soldiers’ Civil R e establishment is restoring the torn flesh, solidifying nerve and lung, and ameliorating other bodily and mental conditions, as well as the most modern science can effect it. A n earned sympathy and human ity enwraps the man who fought. The department’s dietary branch feeds him as no soldier was fed before, the commandant’s branch provides the means fo r smoothing his personal difficulties; the ac counts branch plays its necessary p a rt; whilst the vocational branch 204 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . retains him if, by reason o f his wounds, there is no return possible to the way he made his living before enlisting. Scientific rehabilitation, as the result o f war experience, connotes adequate medical care, proper prothesis, functional reeducation, voca tional training, and system fo r employment— these form the physical side; and, from the mental side, understanding o f psychothenia, sympathetic counseling, patience, and tolerance. I t follow s as a mat ter o f course that in order to achieve the ends o f rehabilitation a system o f pay or allowance must be provided fo r the cripples and their dependents. The necessary adaptations o f these methods to in dustrial cripples constitutes the patent answer to the question, “ H ow to deal with crippled workers.” The jurisdictional differences must be noted. Under present sys tems or under present laws, it is impossible fo r a compensation board to exercise -mandatory control o f the patient from time o f injury. I t is possible, however, to eliminate the inefficient and unscrupulous medi cal practitioners. N or is it possible to require a patient to submit to occupational therapy, but it is possible in large industrial centers to make arrangements with hospitals so that occupational therapy be made a part o f hospital regimen. The first thing necessary to a plan o f rehabilitating industrial cripples is the appointment o f a vocational officer, a man o f broad sympathies and good judgment, one conversant alike with industrial processes and human nature. On notification o f an accident likely to result in serious permanent disability this officer should, i f pos sible, interview the injured man and his dependents, to provide proper hospital accommodation and a living allowance for main tenance o f fam ily, so that the fear o f want could be eliminated from the mind o f the patient, fo r it is the actual fear o f want, o f subse quent incapacitation and industrial uselessness that engenders psycho thenia, the poison that creeps into the mind suddenly shocked by injury and then allowed to stagnate through long and forced idle ness, and psychothenia, even as neurosis, often disables more than injury itself. A n y business or financial worries settled on the mind o f the patient should be dissipated by sound advice so that surgical recovery can be hastened. The patient should be visited often, his prior occupational record should be studied, and his employer can vassed fo r suitable employment. The thought that any service rendered is with the ultimate idea o f reducing compensation should not be allowed to germinate. W hen convalescing time comes, a start should be made toward suggesting new avenues o f employment necessitated by in ju ry; that he can be self-supporting, that his power to work can be restored should be the thoughts dominant in the patient’s mind— this by the power o f suggestion. Naturally the H O W TO DEAL W IT H CRIPPLED W O RK ERS---- T . 1ST. DEAN. 205 m an’s desires should be consulted but he should be impressed gently but firmly with the fact that he must compete with nondisabled workers and so piloted into a sensible and practical occupation. He should be advised further as to the most suitable type o f artificial appliance. Em ployers within the jurisdiction should be canvassed for suitable opportunities. I t is more than a belief that there is suitable employment fo r every disabled man provided he be not insane and that he retains some useful faculty. In point o f fact, experience and such meager statistical data as are available demonstrate this a fact. The actual introduction to the new trade should be in the shop or existent institutions fo r rehabilitation and reeducation. I f fitted, the man should receive further education— in night schools, social service classes, technical schools or business colleges. Finally, when . placed he should be further encouraged to “ carry on ” and sympa thetic tolerance should overbear his vagaries. It is manifest that pay and allowances would be necessary. These could be deducted from compensation without too greatly reducing the amount and without fear o f overpayment. Objections can be urged, it is true, against such a plan, that it is academic in scope, paternalistic in conception, and socialistic in exe cution, that men w ill not submit, that employers w ill not provide em ployment, that the trade-unions would object, that it would cost too much, that it is not practical. Whether it be paternalistic, idealistic, socialistic, or academic is be side the point. The fundamental thing is that there is a problem, that that problem requires solution, that it can be solved, and that’ it can be solved only by action. A ll the writings or talkings can not restore one cripple to service unless there be action. That the employers w ill hire these men is a proved fact. Even as a matter o f business, i f a cripple can compete and the employer, through compensation, has already paid him a part o f wages, surely in return for 100 per cent labor he is w illing to pay a minimum o f wages up to a reason able amount. That men w ill not submit is not shown to be true by war experience, and even i f some o f the wastage can be reclaimed something is done. Trade-unions w ill not object i f they understand the fundamental conception o f rehabilitation, fo r to do so would defeat some o f their own ends. The cost o f the scheme is not over whelming— the services o f one or at most two officers and the incidental postage, office, and traveling expenses— for the number o f cripples in any one jurisdiction in any one year is small. In last analysis the argument against action in restoring cripples to industrial usefulness, in view o f the necessity to provide fo r the added risk by reason o f prior disability, is untenable. In the case o f jurisdictions which refuse permanent total disability compensa tion to a substandard workman who has his remaining earning 206 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . capacity seriously impaired or wiped out in the accident under con sideration, the conclusion can not be supported by the premises. A careful calculation fo r a jurisdiction which provides for total dis ability regardless o f whether that disability was incurred in the present or in a previous accident shows that the average rate per hundred o f pay roll would be increased by less than one-third o f 1 cent in order to meet the added burden necessitated through a humane consideration o f facts. Furthermore, with Canada’s four years o f war cripples back in the country, the problem o f prior disability in relation to subsequent compensation has not become acute nor pressing to the Ontario com pensation board. Pennsylvania has a record o f 42,111 employment openings in that State for its soldiers, sailors, and marines who may return disabled by war service, and it is understood no question o f increased compensation liability has become apparent. A year ago it was urged that action in regard to industrial cripples be taken. It was pointed out that the present system o f pensioning was inadequate and highly artificial, that the whole economic theory o f workmen’s compensation called fo r rehabilitation, that pensioning instead o f being the only thing to be done was but the last o f five equally important things. In the year since elapsed some 30,000 industrial cripples have been thrown on the Nation. T o-day the problem and its solution are left, with the thought o f the old tentmaker— The m oving Finger writes, and, having writ, M oves on, nor all your Piety nor W it Shall lure it back to cancel h alf a line, Nor all your Tears wash out a W ord o f it. C O N S E R V A T IO N O F M A N P O W E R A N D R E H A B IL IT A T IO N O F T H E IN D U S T R IA L L Y D IS A B L E D . B Y L IE U T . COL. H A E E Y E. M O C K , M . C. [This paper was submitted but not read.] Our Nation, follow in g the example o f the other warring nations, has adopted a plan to physically reconstruct, functionally reeducate, and completely rehabilitate all o f her disabled soldiers. Congress in June, 1917, pledged this service by passing the W ar Eisk Insurance Act. The necessity o f conserving our man power as well as the debt which the Nation will owe these disabled soldiers makes such a pro gram obligatory. B y physical reconstruction is meant the continued and complete medical and surgical treatment until the greatest possible restora tion o f the disabled parts has been secured. Functional reeducation consists o f various methods to restore func tion in a disabled part, or to train other members to new work, or to teach the amputated cases the use o f artificial members. In other words, it is com bining with 6ur surgical procedure, which aim at his physical repair, certain other therapeutic measures which w ill help the patient to functionally overcome his handicap. These reeducational methods are: 1. Physiotherapy— massage, hydrotherapy, mechanical appliances, gymnastics, games, etc. 2. Bedside occupations and, later, work in the curative w ork shops— so-called occupational therapy. 3. Mental training— individual and classroom work. This has a psychotherapeutic value. Rehabilitation, or the refitting o f the man to an independent economic position in society, consists o f measures which are neither medical nor surgical, but which can often begin during the course o f his medical treatment. Thus the work o f rehabilitation laps over into the hospital treat ment and in many cases continues fo r an indefinite time after the work o f the medical officers has been completed. In the m ajority o f cases the functional reeducation, especially the occupational therapy, can be made so practicable that it will dove tail in with the rehabilitation work. Therefore, while a portion o f this work must be conducted while the man is under m ilitary control, and a portion must be carried on after the man becomes a civilian, yet, as far as the man him self is 207 208 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . concerned, it will be a gradual, unbroken reclamation to a useful life whatever his handicap may be. These are the plans fo r the disabled soldiers from the Arm y. But no concrete, definite program has yet been conceived for the disabled from the industrial army. D uring the last decade a new specialty has developed in the medical profession dealing with the human maintenance in in dustry. This does not refer to the old-time company physician whose chief, and often only, duty consisted o f emergency treatment for the injured. Rather industrial medicine and surgery includes every thing necessary fo r the complete supervision o f the health o f the w orking force. Human maintenance in industry consists in applying the general principles o f medicine and surgery to a large group o f people as a unit. W hile individuals receive special medical or surgical care whenever needed, yet the chief purpose o f this specialty is prevention. Prevention o f disease or accidents among the entire group o f em ployees; prevention o f undue loss o f time when injury or disease assails an em ployee; prevention o f deformities and permanent dis abilities; prevention o f inefficiency on the job when traceable to some physical condition. In fact, the prevention o f everything which would tend to undermine the physical or mental welfare o f the workers. In order to accomplish this many o f our largest industries have developed a staff o f capable physicians and surgeons who spend part, or all, o f their time at the plant. Here, by being on the job— in the front-line trench o f industry— they are not only in the strategic p o sition to study and apply every phase o f prevention, but also to render immediate and proper medical and surgical care to every sick or injured employee, which after all is only another form o f pre vention. W e have succeeded in having this comprehensive system o f indus trial medicine and surgery adopted by many o f our larger employers. T o-day approximately one-tenth o f the workers o f our Nation are receiving the benefits, to a more or less degree, o f this system. There still remains, however, many more large concerns, the small employer, the householder with his domestic help, the farmer with his hired men, and many others who have not considered it a duty to safeguard the health and welfare o f those w orking fo r them. W hen we consider that 40,000,000 people in the United States are engaged in gainful occupations, we can then comprehend what the adoption o f a Nation-wide program o f disease and accident preven tion would mean to the economic existence o f our country. But in spite o f all our prevention methods we have, and will con tinue to have, the disabled employee in our midst. The man who CO N SERVATION OF M A N PO W ER ---- L IE U T . COL. H . E. M O C K . 209 is no longer able to continue at heavy work because o f a damaged heart or circulatory apparatus; the man who develops tuberculosis, and, even though cured, is afraid to or advised against returning to his form er work, or is rejected from one job after another because o f his damaged lu n g ; the epileptic who, to safeguard the concern against possible compensation, is fired as soon as his condition is know n; the men with hernias, with flat feet, and many other anatomical condi tions that make them inefficient; as well as the armless and legless and others seriously handicapped, the result o f injuries; all make up our army o f disabled men. E very year adds to the total o f in competents who on account o f disease or accidents are prematurely thrown into the scrap heap because their handicap prevents them from continuing at their old occupations. A few industries have salvaged these disabled and made them effi cient and independent. Some industries have given their disabled employees easy jobs where they could make a living. But the very softness o f the job robbed them o f all incentive, and the bitterness en gendered from dying ambition added to their incompetency, so that many o f these drifted on into the scrap heap. Other concerns settled with their disabled workman, when they were legally responsible, and then dismissed him. Their disabled fo r whom they were morally but not legally responsible were scrapped without a settlement. These men, trained fo r certain occupations, who meet with perma nent handicaps, are the waste products o f our industrial life. T oo often when reemployed they are ineffective because they are thrown into the job without considering their physical fitness fo r it. Again, they are given the positions o f watchman, flagman, messengers, porters, and the like when, with proper training, their full mental energy and remaining physical capacities could make them highly efficient in much more useful vocations. The most unfortunate group o f these disabled are those who cease to be employed by the concern responsible for their disability. Other employers are not interested in them— do not feel responsible fo r them. They drift from one job to another, constantly dropping into a lower scale, until finally they relinquish all effort to work. These make up the loafers, the beggar on the corner, the shoe-string mer chant on the street, the poor physically handicapped and mentally debased flotsam and jetsam o f our civilization. The great lesson, therefore, which industrial medicine and surgery can learn from the plans o f the M edical Department o f the A rm y to reclaim the disabled soldier is the complete rehabilitation o f the dis abled from the industrial army. These handicapped soldiers from industry must not only be physi cally cured, but they must be retrained fo r new work when their 124247°— 10------ 14 210 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . disability prevents return to the old jo b ; they must be given suitable employment in a position that affords them equal income and the op portunity fo r initiative and advancement; adequate compensation must be paid them fo r disabilities directly the result o f occupation, without derogatory reaction upon their future opportunities; and proper supervision must be maintained over them to see that their rehabilitation is completed and so remains. To-day, as a result o f our plans fo r the reclaim ing o f the w ar dis abled, the nation is awakening to its responsibility toward the civilian disabled. There is every reason to believe that before long Congress will enact a law fo r the vocational rehabilitation o f the industrially dis abled just as it is now meeting the same question fo r the disabled soldier. It is conceded that the industries o f the country are as essential to the winning o f the war as the m ilitary army. Many o f these indus tries, producing and transporting materials necessary to maintain ing our fighting forces, belong to the Federal Government. Others are controlled by the Government. Still others are civilian. These have built up a vast industrial army, many o f whose men are ex empted from draft because they are needed in this branch o f the service. It has even been suggested that it may become necessary to conscript labor fo r this army. Production and other work in many o f these industries is slowed up, due to {a) insanitary w orking conditions; (&) insanitary living conditions; ( c) failure to select men fo r proper work— especially from a physical standpoint; ( d ) inadequate medical and surgical care; (e) failure to provide disease and accident prevention; ( / ) great labor turnover, resulting from many o f the above conditions; (g) many accidents occur, the result o f em ploying green hands and o f speeding up. A s a war measure the Government must make every unit o f this industrial army as efficient as possible. The health o f these men is o f prim ary importance in accomplishing this. Some medical force o f the Federal Government must take up this work. A s this is a m ili tary measure some existing governmental medical department is the logical force to carry on such a human conservation policy, in those industries directly operated for m ilitary production. The duties o f the governmental medical officers assigned to these m ilitary industries should be: (a) T o establish plant dispensaries. (&) T o give immediate medical and surgical care. This would save lives and man}^ subsequent complications and deformities, (c) T o examine all applicants fo r work. 1. T o protect the old forces from contagious diseases. 2. T o prevent men with disabilities from being placed at work where they could not be efficient— thus to prevent CONSERVATION OF M A N PO W ER---- L IE U T . COL. H . E. M O C K . 211 premature breakdown. 3. T o provide physical selection o f men and women fo r work. ( d ) T o supervise health o f workers by medical examinations. ( e) T o establish plant sanitation. ( / ) T o establish, house sanitation, (g) T o provide fo r all kinds o f disease and acci dent prevention. In Government controlled industries and civilian industries carry ing on any type o f m ilitary work this governmental medical depart ment could assign medical officers at once to act as health inspectors. A precedent is established by certain departments o f the A rm y in that inspectors are assigned to inspect the products o f an industry— as inspectors o f shells in munition plants. Also, a medical officer has been assigned to shipbuilding industries for this work at request o f the Secretary o f W ar. The duties o f these inspectors would be: (a) Inspect plants for insanitary conditions tending to slow up production, and report on same. ( b) Use influence to have these industries establish the above health policy by using civilian doctors. This could be forced by the Government by including certain clauses in contracts, by comman deering methods, etc. Comprehensive plans fo r the reconstruction and otherwise reclaim ing o f the war disabled are being developed by the Federal Govern ment. Since the industrial army is equally serving the country this reclamation work should be extended to include the disabled from these military industries. Hundreds are being disabled every day. Therefore reconstruction hospitals should be established at once and work on the reclaiming o f the disabled from the industrial army begun at once. Man power is at such a premium now that this policy is essential to the winning o f the war. Federal and State govern ments should be held responsible for reclaiming their disabled. A lso this reclamation work should be extended to those rejected because o f disabilities from both the military and the industrial army. A t present these are being thrown back into society as a discard with out the Government taking proper steps to reclaim this man power so badly needed. It is an economic waste which an efficient war policy demands should be conserved. Man power will win this war, man power at the front over there, and man power in the great’ industrial army— the second line o f de fense— over here. A s a Nation we are united in one great purpose— our determination to win this war. Our every motive must be toward this end. Therefore every effort expended fo r the conservation o f human life and the reclamation o f all human energy, in both the military and industrial armies, will be o f the greatest aid in achieving this victory. PROBLEM OF THE CRIPPLED MAN IN INDUSTRY. BY CARL HOOKSTADT, EXPERT, U N IT E D STATES B U R E A U OF LABOR S T A T IS T I C S . T he purposes o f this article are to outline the actual industrial prob lem, as disclosed by several intensive investigations, confronting workmen permanently injured in industry; to analyze the causes o f the various factors entering into the problem ; and to offer certain remedial suggestions. The statements are based' chiefly upon a study o f industrial cripples in Massachusetts, supplemented by similar in vestigations in California, W isconsin, New Y ork City, and Denmark. The facts show the actual economic consequences o f permanent dis abilities under normal industrial conditions. THE PROBLEM. The economic problems resulting from permanent disabilities are indicated by (1) length o f time totally disabled; (2) change o f occu pation and o f em ployer; (3) number unemployed; (4) reduction in wages and earning capacity; (5) relative severity o f various types o f injuries in different occupations and industries; and (6) the adequacy o f present statutory compensation benefits as compared with probable loss o f earning capacity. Period of total disability.— The period o f total disability resulting from the loss o f limbs is shown by the follow ing table. Loss o f a member, as hereinafter used, means loss o f use or impairment o f functions, as well as loss by severance or amputation. P E R IO D OF TOTAL D IS A B IL IT Y R E SU LT IN G FROM LOSS OF LIM B, B Y T Y r E OF IN JU R Y . Average period of total disability in months. Per cent of cases causing total disability of 18 months or over. Type of injury. Massa chusetts. Califor Massa nia. chusetts. Califor nia. Den mark. Loss of— Hand or arm ............................................................. Foot or leg.................................................................. 13.4 24.8 12.7 13.4 26 59 28 42 55 T otal....................................................................... 15.9 13.0 33 33 28 19 The above figures are minimums. Many o f the injured men were still disabled or unemployed at the time o f the investigation, and the actual disability periods, therefore, are longer than the figures indi cate. The accidents investigated in California occurred later than those in Massachusetts, which accounts in part for the shorter disa bility periods reported. 212 T H E C R IP rL E D M A N IN IN D U ST R Y ---- CARL H O OKSTADT. 213 Tw o important facts stand out. One is the greater severity o f the fo o t and leg injuries over those o f the hand and arm, and the other is the unexpectedly long period o f disability in all cases. One-third o f the workers losing a hand or foot are disabled for 18 months or over. The average length o f total disability fo r the lesser injuries is: ■Loss o f one eye, 4.8 m onths; o f one thumb, 2.4 m onths; one finger, 2.1 m onths; two or more fingers, 3.8 months. The relative severity o f the several types o f permanent injuries is also shown by the pro portion o f cases o f each type o f injury in which disability terminates within 5 months. These proportions a re: H and or arm, 21 per cent; foot or leg, 13 per cent; eye, 67 per cent; thumb, 59 per cent; one finger, 91 per cent; and two or more fingers, 76 per cent. The per centages for the loss o f limbs were based upon the combined data o f Massachusetts and C alifornia; the percentages for the other injuries were based upon C alifornia data alone. In each type o f injury the seriousness o f the disability increases with the age o f the workman. The average total disability fo r those under 45 years and those 45 years or over is as fo llo w s: Loss o f one limb, men under 45 years, 12.2 months; men 45 years or over, 20.3 m onths; loss o f one eye, men under 45, 4.4 m onths; men 45 or over, 6.5 months; loss o f one thumb, 4.1 and 4.6 months, respectively; one finger, 2 and 2.7 m onths; two or more fingers, 3.4 and 5.1 months. Here again the averages fo r the m ajor injuries are based upon the combined Massachusetts and California data, whereas the lesser injuries are fo r C alifornia alone. Change of employer and occupation.— Opportunity for reemploy ment by the same employer varies inversely with the severity o f the injury. O f those who lose a hand or foot less than 40 per cent (Mas sachusetts, 39 per cent; California, 37 per cent; W isconsin, 37 per cent) return to the same employer. F o r other injuries the percent ages o f workmen returning to the same employer are as fo llo w s: Eye, 62 ; thumb, 56; one finger, 58; two or more fingers, 57. A bility to return to the same occupation also decreases with the severity o f the injury. O f those who lose a hand or foot less than one-third return to the same occupation (Massachusetts, 10 per cent; California, 33 per cent; W isconsin, 18 per cent; Denmark, 24.4 per cent). F or other injuries the percentages in California are as fo l lows : Eye, 73; thumb, 68; one finger, 69; two or more fingers, 60. A bout one-third o f the persons, therefore, sustaining a major in jury return to the same employer, and about one-fourth reenter the same occupation, while in the case o f m inor injuries three-fifths re turn to the same employer and two-thirds follow the same occupa tion. O f the several types o f injuries the loss o f an eye has the least effect upon the change o f occupation or employer. 214 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . The character o f the industry determines to a considerable extent whether the injured man is reemployed in the same industry or by the same employer. Machinery m anufacturing establishments show a high percentage o f reemployment. This is due mainly to two rea sons: First, the employees are usually highly skilled, and because o f this fact are more readily reem ployable; second, because o f the nature o f the work employment fo r this type o f disabled man is either already available or can be more easily created. On the other hand, employers in the building construction or trucking business show a low percentage o f reemployments. The character o f the work and the small size o f the establishment account chiefly fo r the nonreem ployment in these industries. The percentage o f those unemployed increases with the serious ness o f the injury. O f those who lost a lim b about one-fourth were unemployed at the time o f the investigation (Massachusetts, 23 per cent; California, 27 per cent; W isconsin, 16 per cent; New Y ork City, 54 per cent). O f 45 eye-injury cases in California, 13 per cent were unemployed. A m ong those suffering minor injuries the per cent o f unemployment was small. In C alifornia, o f those losing one finger, 2 per cent were unem ployed; o f those losing two or more fingers, 5 per cent were unem ployed; and o f those losing a thumb, hone was unemployed. There was practically no difference between right-hand and lefthand injuries as regards length o f total disability and opportunity fo r reemployment. This is due to the fact, as will be explained later, that a crippled man’s greatest handicap is not his inability to per form work, but his inability to get a job. A comparison, from the standpoint o f degree o f skill required, o f occupations held by workmen before and after injury, shows that a smaller number were engaged in skilled work after the injury than before it. In Massachusetts, o f the injured workers losing a limb, 60 per cent were in skilled occupations before the injury, whereas only 31 per cent were in skilled occupations after the injury. In California the corresponding percentages were 61 before and 45 after the injury. O f those sustaining minor injuries practically the same per cent were in skilled occupations after the injury as there were before. Inability to speak English in many cases lessens the opportunity fo r reemployment, although it is not possible to show this statisti cally, because o f incomplete and indefinite data. In a number o f cases reported by the industrial accident board and by insurance companies in Massachusetts this factor had a determining influence. A bility to understand and speak English may not be o f vital im portance to a machine tender in a cotton mill, but it is essential to T H E CRIPPLED M A N IN IN D U ST R Y ---- CARL H O OK STAD T. 215 watchmen, messengers, and elevator operators, and it is occupations o f this character that most o f the injured employees fill after their injury. Summarizing the above conclusions, it may be said that reem ployability o f crippled industrial workers varies directly with degree o f occupational skill and ability to speak English, and inversely with the severity o f the injury and the age o f the employee. Change in wages and earning capacity.— The effect o f the injuries upon earning capacity is difficult o f determination. Change in earning capacity is indicated by the difference in the wages received before and after injury, but this method o f comparison is entirely misleading unless industrial conditions have remained stationary for a sufficient length o f time. Another method is to compare the wages o f crippled workers with those received by normal workers in the same occupation; this method is faulty, however, in that it takes no account o f change in occupation necessitated by the injury. The best method o f measuring reduction o f earning capacity is to com pare the present wages o f fhe injured worker with the wages current in the occupation in which he was injured. In Massachusetts 48 per cent o f the injured workmen (hand and foot cases) received less at the time they returned to work than they received before the injury, 34 per cent received the same wages, and 18 per cent received a higher wage. In California the corresponding percentages were 41, 33, and 26. In case o f the lesser injuries (eye, thumb, and fingers) 17 per cent received less, 33 per cent received the same, and 50 per cent received more. Relative severity of upper and lower limb injuries.— I t may be well to emphasize here that while from the medical and economic standpoint the loss o f a foot or leg is more serious than the loss o f a hand or arm, the compensation schedules o f every State are based upon the theory that industrial workers who lose an upper limb suf fer a greater economic loss than those who lose a foot or a leg. Even the committee on statistics o f the International Association o f In dustrial A ccident Boards and Commissions seems to have adopted this view in form ulating its severity rating schedule. The common, and practically the only, argument in substantiation o f this belief is that 66it stands to reason.” Y et an analysis o f the follow in g table, giving the results o f fou r independent investigations, shows the con trary to be true. There are tw o main reasons fo r this. In the first place the economic severity o f foot and leg injuries is accentuated by the fact that a preponderant number occur in industries in which the loss o f the member is a practical bar to employment. A one-legged man is effectively excluded from most o f the operations in the transporta tion, construction, lumbering, and m ining industries; it is in employ 216 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . ment o f this character that three-fourths o f the foot and leg injuries occur. In California 91 per cent o f the permanent fo o t and leg in juries occurred in nonmanufacturing industries and 60 per cent occurred in transportation and construction. A n analysis o f the permanent disability accidents in Massachusetts during the first four years5operation o f the compensation act shows that 75 per cent o f the hand and arm injuries occurred in m anufacturing industries and 25 per cent in nonmanufacturing industries, while the percentages as regards foot and leg injuries were exactly reversed, being 25 in m anufacturing and 75 in nonm anufacturing industries. Nearly all o f the latter injuries occurred in the building trades, transportation, and construction. O rdinarily when one thinks o f the relative industrial usefulness o f an upper and a lower limb one has in mind factory operations. A nd, o f course, in operating a machine a one-legged man is less handi capped than a one-armed m a n ; but machine operators do not lose their legs, they lose their hands and arms. In manufacturing indus tries in which the m ajority o f upper-limt) injuries occur, the injured workman can often go back to the same employer or the same occupa tion. On the other hand, the industries dangerous to lower limbs are the industries in which the use o f lower limbs is practically in dispensable. A larger proportion o f those who sustain foot and leg injuries, therefore, must seek a new employer, and this fact affects adversely their reem ployability (see table below ). In the second place, the greatest industrial handicap heretofore suffered by a crippled worker, as already noted, has not been his inability to perform work, but his inability to get a job. Potential ability to perform work is o f little use to a workman who by reason o f his injury is prevented from seeking employment, or is not em ployed even i f he does find a prospective job. The follow in g table shows the relative severity o f upper and lower limb injuries as shown by fou r independent investigations: R E L A T IV E SE V E R IT Y OF U P P E R A N D L O W E R LIMB IN JU R IE S AS SHO W N B Y VA R IO U S INV ESTIG A TIO N S. Place of investigation. M assachusetts..................................................... California ........................................................... New York C ity................................................... Denmark ...................................................... 1 Ter cent reemployed by same employer. Per cent of Per cent reAverage pe cases in which employed by riod of total disability con Ter cent same employ disability in tinued for 18 unemployed. er or in same months. months or occupation. more. Hand or arm. Foot or leg. Hand or arm. Foot or leg. 13.4 12.7 24.8 13.4 26 28 59 42 19 55 2 Hand or arm. Foot or leg. 30 41 8 24 62 17 H and Foot or or arm. leg. 52 i 40 30 132 a 27 *1 6 Ter cent of persons reemployed in same occupations. T H E CRIPPLED M A N IN IN D U ST R Y ---- CARL H O OK STAD T. 217' It w ill be noted that in practically every case the loss o f a foot or a leg is more serious than the loss o f a hand or an arm as regards length o f total disability/, per cent o f persons reemployed by same employer or in same occupation, and per cent o f persons remaining unem ployed after the injury. Comparison of statutory benefits with probable loss of earning capacity.— Adequacy o f compensation benefits should be earnestly considered in conjunction wTith the whole rehabilitation and reemployment problem. In none o f the existing State compensation laws is the scale o f benefits commensurate with the economic losses sustained by reason o f industrial injuries. The benefits provided under the most liberal law are not more than 50 per cent o f full indemnity, and those provided under the least liberal law are not over h alf that o f the most liberal. Some idea o f this inadequacy is obtained by com paring the statutory benefits with the schedule o f severity ratings o f industrial injuries formulated by the committee on statistics o f the International Association o f Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions. The purpose o f this schedule was to obtain a more accurate measure o f industrial hazards and was not intended as a basis o f compensation awards. Assuming, however, that the schedule is a reasonable measure o f adequacy fo r compen sation payments, how do the compensation scales in our State laws compare with this schedule? The follow ing table shows, fo r the more important injuries, the severity ratings in terms o f number o f weeks o f time lost as computed by the committee on statistics, the number o f weeks o f compensation benefits usually provided in State laws, and* the percentage the average time allowances o f all the States is o f the severity schedule: SE V E R IT Y RATING IN TIME LOST FROM EACH SPEC IFIE D IN JU R Y , A N D P E R C ENT OF TH IS LOSS COM PENSATED B Y ST A T U T O R Y B E N E F IT S . Injury. D ea th ..................................................................................... Permanent total disability.................................................. Loss of— A r m ................................................................................ Hand ........................................................................... L e g .................................................................................. Foot.................................................................................. E v e .................................................................................. Thumb ....................................................................... Index finger .................................................................. Great to e................................. ........................................ Severity rat Number of ings in time weeks for which lost (in weeks), compensation computed by is usually pay committee on able unaer statistics of State compen I. A .L A .B .C . sation laws.1 Per cent aver age time allow ance of Stale laws is of com m ittee’s sever ity schedule.2 1,000 1,000 300 500 64 600-750 500 500-750 400 300 100 50 50 200 150 175 125 100 60 30 30 29 33 38 35 36 53 66 55 1 The number of weeks here given are those provided in the normal or model State compensation law. 2 These averages are computed from the arithmetical average of all the State laws having specific schedules. 218 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . A s the table shows, the average statutory compensation provided fo r the loss o f a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye is approximately onethird o f the loss o f earning capacity caused by such injuries. M ore over, the adequacy o f the benefits provided decreases with the severity o f the injury. The above percentages refer only* to time. W hen the statutory wage percentages are applied, the percentages o f adequacy are still further reduced. Furthermore, a just and ade quate compensation scale fo r permanent disabilities should take into account not only the workman’s decreased earning capacity, but his increased livin g expenses as well. I f the necessary expenditures o f a one-legged man are greater than those o f a normal man, his net in come and consequently his real earning are doubly reduced. ANALYSIS OF CAUSES* From the foregoing facts it is quite clear that the present industrial handicap o f the workman who sustains a m ajor injury is a serious one. The period o f total disability resulting from the injury is unneces sarily long. Only about one-third o f the seriously crippled workers return to the same employer, and relatively few reenter the same occupation. The compensation benefits are inadequate, and prac tically no retraining has been done. A critical analysis o f the several contributory causes shows that nearly all o f these causes have their origin in, and are closely related to, the absence o f a central and responsible supervising authority. The welfare o f our crippled men has been nobody’s business. Closely connected with this irresponsi bility is the lack o f opportunity. The very fact that men a^e crippled has closed the door o f opportunity against them. They are not given a chance to show their worth or ability. Some o f the more im portant o f these contributory causes, in the order in which they would present themselves to the injured employees, are as fo llo w s : 1. The injury produces a sense o f helplessness and uselessness. The injured man’s self-reliance is temporarily destroyed and he feels that he is “ done fo r ” fo r the remainder o f his life. Coupled with this is a feeling o f resentment and bitterness toward society for his injury. In many cases he refuses to cooperate and adopts an antago nistic attitude toward all efforts to help him. H is unfam iliarity with his legal rights prevents him from distinguishing between those who wish to help him and those who desire to exploit him. Usually the_first person with whom he comes in contact follow ing his injury is the insurance company adjuster, who often antagonizes him and arouses his suspicions. The agent’s efforts to obtain the facts in the case in order to ascertain whether and to what extent the company is liable are interpreted as an attempt to take advantage o f him. In many cases the agent is tactless, unsympathetic, and inclined to T H E CRIPPLED M A N IN IN D U ST R Y — CARL H O O K STAD T. 219 take advantage o f the employee. A t the very time when the injured man is in most need o f assistance and sympathetic advice he meets with indifference and exploitation. This initial experience colors all his subsequent acts and has an important effect upon his reaction toward medical treatment, rehabilitation, and reemployment. 2. Another contributory cause is the inadequate medical service furnished, both as to quantity and quality. From every viewpoint, and especially from that o f social economy, unlimited medical and surgical treatment, without cost to the employee, should be provided. Here again the element o f distrust affects adversely the speedy recovery o f the injured man. In many cases the employee is sus picious o f the service provided by the insurance carrier and is ex ploited by those in whom he has confidence and who speak his own language. There is no one to take an intelligent interest in him and to obtain his confidence. Furthermore, some races are pecul iarly sensitive to pain and refuse to undergo necessary operations or other treatment recommended. Because o f this lack o f coopera tion the injury does not heal properly and disability is unnecessarily prolonged, or made permanent. 3. A third contributory factor, correlated with the medical service, is the lack o f rehabilitation hospitals fo r functional restoration. Practically the only attempt at rehabilitation revealed by these studies was the furnishing o f artificial hands or arms, and these were supplied in only about one-half the cases. In many instances the men refused to wear these appliances, either because they did not fit or because they were unsightly and useless. No systematic in struction in the adjustment and use o f them was given. 4. Not only has there been very little reeducation and retraining o f industrial cripples, but a large proportion have never been educated or industrially trained at all. The task o f retraining our disabled men brings into relief the great need for industrial education. H ow ever, those who are most helpless and in need o f assistance are fo r eigners, and consequently even an adequate industrial education system would not solve the whole problem. But by no means all o f the disabled would be subjects for retraining. V ery little could probably be done with the old men— those who were already near the end o f their industrial career at the time o f the injury. But an intelligent readjustment o f industry and the interested cooperation o f employers would take care o f most o f the remainder. Thousands o f positions exist which a one-armed or one-legged man could fill as successfully as a normal man. Obviously, however, it would not be desirable to place all these injured men in such positions without regard to age. F or example, men under 21 or 25 years o f age should not spend the rest o f their lives operating elevators. Those most in 220 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . need and best adapted fo r reeducation are the young men. O f the disabled men studied in Massachusetts, 12 per cent were under 21 years, 28 per cent were under 24, and 43 per cent were under 30. F o r C alifornia the corresponding percentages are 9, 18, and 35. M ost o f these could probably be benefited by reeducation and re training fo r suitable occupations. 5. None o f the compensation States have established proper facili ties fo r the reemployment o f handicapped men. In Massachusetts insurance companies must pay compensation fo r total disability until the men are reemployed. Consequently, it is incumbent upon them to*find employment, but they have not been very successful. Em ployers refuse to employ these industrial cripples unless they were injured in their own establishments. Even then, because o f the character o f the industry, the size o f the establishment, the em ployee’s lack o f skill and ability to speak English, his possible adverse effect upon plant output and processes o f production, and the risk o f a second injury causing serious or total disability, many are not reemployed. Few employers will employ handicapped men injured in other establishments. They feel no moral responsibility in the matter and do not want to be bothered with cripples, especially i f plenty o f . normal workers can be had at low wages. On the other hand, many employers do feel morally responsible fo r workmen injured in their own establishments, and this despite the fact that’ their fu ll legal obligations have been met by the payment o f com pensation insurance premiums. However, moral responsibility, though important, is not necessarily the sole determining motive in reem ploying even their own injured men. A study o f the reemploy ment cases in Massachusetts discloses the fact that in many instances the men taken back are old, faithful, and usually skilled employees whose knowledge o f the business is an economic asset to the employer. One reason frequently advanced fo r not em ploying handicapped men is that such men constitute an extrahazardous risk. From the accident-compensation standpoint, injuries sustained by physically defective workmen are more serious than similar injuries sustained by normal workers and the accident or insurance cost to employers or insurance carriers would be increased. A s a matter o f fact, however, this fact is probably largely psychological, fo r the number o f such accidents as compared with the total is practically negligible. N o figures are available showing the actual number o f second perma nent' injuries. However, a computation made by the Bureau o f Labor Statistics from accident data furnished by the Industrial Commission o f W isconsin shows that the annual number o f second m ajor injuries would at the very most be not over four in the entire State, that is, o f all the persons in the State o f W isconsin who had T H E CRIPPLED M A N IN IN D U ST R Y ---- CARL H O OK STAD T. 221 lost a hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye not more than fou r would suffer the loss o f a second m ajor disability in any given year. From the insurance standpoint, therefore, the employment o f physically defective men would present no special problem. The increased compensation cost, which, w ould be slight, could be taken care o f by the necessary increase in insurance rates. But this does not hold true as regards self-insured *employers, because in such establishments there is a greater and more direct connection between accidents and compensation costs, and because o f this connection there is a decided tendency among self-insurers, through their system o f physical examinations, to discriminate against handicapped men. This factor o f discrimination, therefore, whether based upon justi fiable grounds or not, does actually exist and must be met. Tw o remedial measures suggest themselves. One is, the adoption o f the New Y ork plan o f compensating fo r second injuries. Under the compensation act o f this State the liability o f an employer fo r a second m ajor disabling injury is limited to' the liability resulting from that particular injury without reference to any prior disability. Compensation fo r the remaining disability is paid out o f a special fund, which could be charged to the industry as a whole. Since July 1 o f this year the Industrial Commission o f Ohio has also put this plan into effect in that State. Thus, from the compensation viewpoint the extra hazard element inherent in a handicapped man would be eliminated and one factor o f discrimination removed. A second remedial measure would be the adoption o f a plan p ro viding that employers, before they are granted the privilege o f carrying their own risk under the compensation act, must agree not to discriminate against crippled men in the matter o f employment. Such an agreement by employers is required by the compensation board o f Pennsylvania. 6. One o f the chief obstacles in the way o f a successful solution o f the whole rehabilitation problem lies in the very nature o f our indus trial society. Reemployment is beyond the State’s present power. Our industries are privately owned and consequently opportunities fo r industrial employment are under the exclusive control o f private employers. Em ployers therefore can not legally be compelled to reemploy handicapped workers. This question o f compulsory employment has been considered by foreign countries in connection with the reemployment o f disabled soldiers. In France employers who refuse to reemploy their propor tionate share o f m ilitary cripples are excluded from obtaining any concession, m onopoly, or subsidy from the State. In Italy private employers em ploying three or more persons must take back those 222 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N , employees who had been with them one year i f they can do the same work. The Paris conference o f May, 1917, went on record as fo llo w s : It belongs to the legislature o f each allied country to decide whether or not employers should be placed under obligation to employ disabled soldiers. Meantime, the interallied conference holds that there is a m oral obligation resting upon employers to employ disabled soldiers in a number proportional to the im portance and personnel o f each industrial and com m ercial estab lishment. This principle o f compulsion or constraint m ight conceivably be applied to the employment o f industrial cripples. F or example, the State compensation acts m ight be amended to provide that employers having a certain number o f employees must pay additional compen sation to injured workmen i f they refuse to reemploy tl\ese men at suitable jobs and at fair wages. Such a scheme m ight act as an incentive for employers to make an intelligent study o f their estab lishments, with the result that positions could be found or created which would be mutually beneficial. 7. But actual restoration to industry solves only h a lf o f the prob lem. It is important to know under what conditions injured workers are reemployed. W hat wages should they receive, both absolutely and in relation to normal workers ? W hat effect w ill their reem ploy ment have upon the displacement o f normal workers and upon the integrity o f the organized labor movement? Those employers who maintain sick-benefit funds, welfare plans, and the like seem more inclined to reemploy and take care o f their injured workers than other employers. On the other hand, they are extremely hostile to labor organizations and would resent interference from this quarter. It is the policy o f some o f the labor unions to look after their own disabled men, but a large proportion o f injured workers are not mem bers o f labor organizations. The difficulties involved in these funda mental problems, though great, need not be insolvable, but they require cooperation and careful study. 8. Another factor tending to prolong disability and prevent early return to industry is the operation o f the lump-sum provision in many o f the State compensation laws. A lump sum usually looks large and inviting to the average employee. He may want to return to his native country or to invest the proceeds in some small business enterprise, though these reasons are frequently given merely as a pretext to influence the industrial board. Often the employee is afraid that his return to work would prejudice his rights under the law. As a result the case drags on and on until for sheer relief a lump sum is finally granted. 9. F or the reasons mentioned above the injured man remains dis abled and unemployed much longer than the circumstances warrant. Accustomed to idleness and regular compensation payments he feels T H E CRIPPLED M A N IN IN D U S T R Y — CARL H O O K STAD T. 223 progressively less inclined to resume work. H e gets into a rut, adapts himself to a lower standard o f living, and loses his ambition and initiative. H is idle time is frequently spent in saloons and other lounging places, in which he finds cronies similarly situated. Here he discusses his ailments, the seriousness o f which he is inclined to exaggerate, and the effect o f which produces a psychosis which im pairs his w ill power and accelerates his physical deterioration. 10. A n analysis o f the foregoing contributory causes shows that they are all closely related to, and the result o f, the lack o f an intelli gent and responsible supervision. The welfare o f our disabled men, whether injured in m ilitary or civil life, is a social and public func tion. Accident prevention, compensation, insurance, medical treat ment, rehabilitation, reeducation, and reemployment are all com ponent parts o f this problem and should be under the supervision and jurisdiction o f a single public body. D elegating to private agencies the performance o f these social functions should no longer be toler ated. This is not intended as a criticism o f these private agencies. They have developed largely because the State failed to grasp its opportunity or shirked its responsibility; but the fact remains that they have not been able to perform these social functions successfully. REMEDIAL SUGGESTIONS. A n examination o f the facts and. an analysis o f the contributory causes prom pt the follow in g remedial suggestions: 1. Compensation.— (a) The compensation scale o f benefits should be materially increased to approximate the loss o f earning capacity. (&) Benefits for permanent injuries causing dismemberment or muti lation should be fixed at a definite, though adequate, amount, graded according to nature o f disability and age and occupation o f the em ployee, but not dependent upon employment in individual cases. Injured employees should not be penalized fo r rehabilitating them selves. W hen the injured man knows that the amount o f his com pensation will not be affected by his early return to industry, disabil ity and unemployment w ill be materially decreased. ( c) In Massa chusetts compensation is paid fo r the loss o f a major member fo r 50 weeks, and also fo r total disability while disabled, and these pay ments run concurrently. This practice o f concurrent payments should be abolished. The combined weekly amounts o f such pay ments in most cases exceed the employee’s wages. Employees are often under the impression that the amount received will continue indefinitely, and consequently have less desire to return to work. (d) The present system o f granting lump sums should be abolished or materially restricted fo r reasons already explained. ( e) E m ploy ers should be relieved o f the added risk involved in the employment o f disabled workers. 224 R E H A B IL IT A T IO N . 2. M e d i c a l s e r v i c e . — ( a ) Adequate medical and surgical treatment, including necessary appliances, should be furnished by the State. (6) Orthopedic and rehabilitation hospitals should be established and maintained by the State, utilizing present institutions wherever possible. 3. R e e d u c a t i o n a n d r e t r a i n i n g .— There should be established voca tional training schools, with both day and night courses, which should be closely correlated with the rehabilitation hospitals. 4. R e e m p l o y m e n t .— A survey o f the occupational opportunities in the various industries o f the State should be made and the coopera tion of the employers and labor organizations should be enlisted. Thousands o f positions exist or could be created which crippled workers could fill as successfully as normal workmen were the prob lem carefully studied and an intelligent readjustment made. Par ticular care should be taken to eliminate the stigma o f charity. The positions should be necessary and constructive in an industrial sense in order that the handicapped man may feel himself an integral and important part o f the economic world and thus maintain his selfrespect. 5. I n s u r a n c e .— In the field o f workmen’s compensation, competitive insurance companies are wholly unsatisfactory. Either a monopo listic State insurance fund or an employers’ mutual association should be substituted for the competitive casualty companies. 6. A d m i n i s t r a t i o n .— The entire administrative and supervisory work should be under the jurisdiction of one central authority, pref erably the industrial accident commission. This commission should, in case o f necessity, have power to coerce the employee as well as the employer. Confidence, impartiality, and intelligent direction and supervision are vital factors in the whole rehabilitation problem, and these can best be obtained through public administration. Mr. Ralph M. Little, former chairman of the United States Em ployees’ Compensation Commission, and now director of the Ameri can Museum o f Safety, called the attention of the conference to the Smith-Bankhead bills (S. 4922 and H. R. 12880) providing for Fed eral and State cooperation in promoting the vocational rehabilitation o f persons disabled in industry or otherwise and their return to civil employment. He gave an address explaining the meaning and objects o f the bills and urged that they receive the support o f the association. The following motion was passed by the convention: M oved that this organization indorse the principle o f the Smith-Bankhead bills (S. 4922 and H. R. 12880) and that the president o f this organization be authorized and instructed to appoint a committee fo r the purpose o f furthering legislation along that line. o