The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
L îB R A R Y ROOM 5030 JÜN 141972 TREASURY DEPARTMENT For release, morning papers January 1, 1929 Treasury Department o p e r B y f U D u L Ih i- I ■ i v : I •! gTOrcfyBNb) Washington, December 31, 1928* \ s\ t HSi: _____ ___________ —— New Year Statement by Secretary Mellon. . ’ During the la s t year the country has made steady progress. Early in the year the volume o f business began to show marked improvement over the Closing months o f 1927, and this improvement has continued. I t has been evident in manufacturing, in s te e l production, carloading, automobile production, building contracts and sales o f goods to consumers. A ll o f this is evidence also that buying power has been sustained and that, on the whole, sa tis fa c to ry employment conditions have p reva iled . P rices in basic industries have not been unduly high and have remained f a i r l y stable, nor does there seem to be any immediate danger of excessive demand sending prices to such high le v e ls as to make a slump in a c t iv it y and consequently in prices in e v ita b le . • In the in du strial world, condi tions seem to be on an even k e e l; and i t is much b e tte r to have them so, with a s lig h t upward tendency, as at present* In the fin a n cia l world, there is s u ffic ie n t money a va ila b le fob a l l legitim a te undertakings. ed during the past year. A considerable amount of gold has been export But i t has not seriou sly impaired our c re d it re sources while, at the same time, i t has helped to establish the gold stand ard more firm ly in Europe and to s ta b iliz e fo reig n currencies with re su ltirg b en efits to our import and export trade. In so fa r as the Government is concerned, the finances are in a sound condition* The debt has been reduced to manageable proportions; the reve nues are ample fo r our needs; and during the past year there has been another reduction o f taxes, the f u l l b en efit o f which w ill be more gen erally f e l t during the coming year. For a l l of these reasons, I look forward with confidence to continued progress in the year ahead* FOE IMMEDIATE RELEASE, j Friday, January 4, 1929. TREASURY DEPARTMENT §¡¡¡1 i M* The Secretary o f the Treasury today issued the follow ing statement in connection with the promulgation o f the Treasury Regulations re la tin g to consolidated income tax returns of a f f i li a t e d corporations? Section 141 o f the Revenue Act of 1928 imposes upon the Treasury the duty to prescribe regulations, le g is la t iv e in character, fo r the f i l i n g of consolidated returns by a f f i li a t e d corporations and the determination and enforcement o f the tax l i a b i l i t y thereunder. Early la s t summer I appointed a Committee to undertake this work, conposed of Mr. Henry Herrick Bond, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Mr# David H. B la ir , the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue, Mr. Clarence M. Charest, the General Counsel o f the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Mr. Ellsworth C. Alvord, Special Assistant to the Secretary o f the Treasury. The Committee held hearings and various organizations o f taxpayers and the public generally were invited to present If 'pi||||11|,■|i§ The Regulations promulgated today represent the th eir views and proposals. judgment o f the Committee formed a fte r the hearings, a ft e r months o f study, and a ft e r constant consultation with many o f the recognized experts and students of the problems. Many basic or fundamental theories were advanced, including the socalled Economic unity" and " le g a l" p rin c ip le s. It was obvious, however, that the Regulations must conform as clo sely as possible to the p o lic ie s already adopted by the Congress and applicable to the determination o f tax l i a b i l i t i e s o f separate corporations and o f corporate stockholders, pre serving the sound purposes fo r which the p riv ile g e o f f i l i n g consolidated returns is properly granted and safeguarding against improper advantages and the evasion or avoidance o f tax l i a b i l i t i e s * Next in importance to the 3 - 2 - above seemed the necessity fo r certainty in the rules to be applied to the more important or more common transactions. It is hoped that under the Begulations taxpayers w i l l be in a much better position to determine in advance the tax l i a b i l i t i e s to resu lt from a contemplated transaction, a very desirable substitute fo r the situation under p rio r laws in which tax l i a b i l i t i e s of a f f i li a t e d corporations would ordin arily not be determinable u n til long a ft e r the transactions involved took place* Those who have been devoting their time to the preparation o f the Begulations undoubtedly recognize, f a r more than others, the re a l d if fic u lt ie s o f the undertaking. Although i t is to be expected that there w i l l be differences o f opinion as to some o f the p a rtic u la r rules adopted, the Treasury believes that the Begulations w ill be much more satisfacto ry than the uncertainties of the past and w ill prove by experiences over a period of years to be acceptable and sound. The more important provisions o f the Begulations may be summarized b r ie f ly as follows? (1) Future Application only. The Begulations apply only to the taxable year 1929 and subsequent taxable years. They are not to be ap p lie d retroactively, although some o f the provisions naturally are based upon the position taken under p rio r laws. (2 ) Administrative Provisions. The parent corporation is the agent o f each corpo ration in the group and the Treasury w i l l deal only with the parent, with the necessary provisions to apply in case the parent is dissolved or a subsidiary leaves the group. The i - 3 p riv ile g e to f i l e a consolidated return must be exercised at the time the parent f i l e s it s return, and every member o f the group must be included in the return# Generally speaking, a group which elects to f i l e a consolidated return fo r any year Mist continue on the same basis fo r subsequent years# ( 3) L ia b ilit y fo r Tax. The parent corporation and each subsidiary remain severally lia b le fo r the tax shown on the o rigin al return anfl fo r any deficiency, with a provision that i f a subsidiary ceases to be a member o f the group by reason of a sale of stock p r io r to the assessment o f the deficiency its l i a b i l i t y continues only fo r its share of the deficiency computed on the basis o f it s share of the consolidated net income. ( 4) Consolidated Het Income* The net income o f the a f f i li a t e d group is , in e ffe c t, the algebraic sum o f the net incomes o f the separate coi^)ora tions in the group, with necessary eliminations to prevent recognition o f gain or lo ss upon purely intercompany trans actions# (5 ) Sale o f Stock o f Subsidiary# Gain or lo ss is recognized upon the sale o f stock o f a subsidiary, whether or not the a f f i l i a t i o n is broken* Inasmuch as under a consolidated return net losses o f one member o f the group may be o ffse t against the gains o f other members, it was necessary to prevent a second allowance (that i s , also upon the sale o f the stock) o f the losses which have been availed o f in the consolidated return but - 4 - which could not have been availed o f i f separate returns had "been file d # There is much to he said fo r making an adjustment also fo r the gains of the subsidiary which were taxed to i t when earned. However, inasmuch as gains can he cared fo r hy the declaration of dividends p r io r to the sale o f the stock (thus preventing the socalled “double taxation* fo r the r e l i e f of which the adjustment was proposed), i t was not believed the advantages o f an increased basis, which would resu lt i f a consolidated return were f i l e d but which would be denied to a separate corporation, were ju stifie d # Again, i f adjustments fo r gains were to be made corresponding ad justments fo r dividends would be required. The admittedly compli cated provisions applicable to the adjustments fo r losses would appear simple indeed as compared to the provisions which would be necessary to provide properly fo r adjustments fo r gains and p ill dividends. I t was rather singular that no one advocated the ru le , which has been adopted as to the past in decisions o f the lower courts and o f the Board o f Tax Appeals, that gain or lo ss should not be recognized upon the sale o f stock o f a subsidiary# Such a rule would, obviously, have the e ffe c t of removing the present tax upon a re a liza tio n o f appreciation in value o f cap ital assets# The Begulations also protect against “paper* losses re sulting from purely a r t i f i c a l or fic t it io u s transactions# (6 ) D issolution of Subsidiary. le ith e r gain nor lo ss is recognized upon the dissolution o f a subsidiary. Dissolutions may, in theory, be c la s s ifie d into three general types t (a ) A “purchasing* dissolution, where, in order to obtain the assets, the stock is purchased and the eorpo- - ration then dissolved; (b ) 5 - a "reorganization” dissolution , where a subsidiary is dissolved in order to effe c t a purely internal rearrangement or reorganization; and (c ) a "winding-up8 disso lu tion , where i t is decided to abandon the business and close out the a ffia r s o f fhe subsidiary* Obviously, no gain or lo ss should be recognized, fo r none is actu ally realized , in the case of dis solutions o f the f i r s t two types, while any gain should be taxed and any lo ss allowed as a deduction in the case o f a dissolution o f the th ird type. Generally speaking, however, dissolutions as a p ractical matter cannot be read ily c la s s ifie d * transactions f a llin g into more than one o f the three types are very frequently involved, and the purposes o f a d issolu tion do not alwways remain constant and are not always apparent or ascertainable. Inasmuch as i t would be impossible to prescribe a rule which would distinguiéh the types and which would be susceptible o f sound administration, and in view of the fact that the benefit o f losses which are properly allowable are not denied i f the loss is realized before the dissolution or i f the subsidiary is not a member o f the group at the time o f the dissolution, i t was concluded that the rule adopted in the ^Regulations, treatin g a l l dissolutions as intercompany transactions, was the safest and best and would prove the most satisfactory* Very sub stan tial benefits both to taxpayers and the Government w i l l result in the certainty as to the rule which is to be applied. (7 ) Basis o f Property* The basis of property owned by a corporation is not affected by intercoupany transactions or by the purchase or sale of it s stock* / - (8) 6 - Net Losses* Consolidated net losses fo r 1929 and subsequent years can “be carried forward by the same a f f i li a t e d group* I f the group is broken up, the net lo ss follow s the parent and in case is to be allowed to the subsidiary. A corporation coming into a group carries it s net lo ss with. i t , subject only to the protective provision that i t cannot exceed the amount paid by the group fo r it s stock i f the a f f i l i a t i o n is formed a ft e r January 1 o f this year* Provision is also made fo r the carry ing forward, subject to certain lim itation s, o f net losses sus tained fo r one or both of the taxable years p rio r to 1929 i f a consolidated return is f i l e d under the new Hegulations* (9 ) Credit fo r foreign Taxes. The credit fo r foreign taxes is to be confuted as i f the a f f ilia t e d group were the taxpayer* FOE IMICEDIATE HELEASE, Monday, January»- 14, 1929 TEEASUHT DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon today sent the fo llo w in g l e t t e r to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations• Hon« Francis E. Warren, Chairman, Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate. January 12, 1929* Ity dear Mr. Chairman: In acknowledging receip t of your le t t e r of January 11th, in which you state that the F ir s t D eficiency B i l l has been reported to the Senate with the inclusion of an item o f $25,000,000 fo r the Bureau of Proh ib ition , fo r p roh ib ition enforcement, and that i t is the wish of the Committee that the Treasury Dejjartnent furnish a statement as to whether in the opinion o f the Department such a sun could be ju diciou sly expended, and i f granted by Congress how such an amount would be a llocated , permit me to give you a b r ie f general statement on the subject o f p roh ib ition enforcement* The problem of proh ib ition enforcement has many ram ification s and it s successful solution depends not only op anple appropriations fo r the Bureau of P roh ib ition but on the a c t iv it ie s and situ ation of other depart ments and bureaus of the Government. The question, th erefore, of whether an increase of $25,000,000 in the amount appropriated fo r the Bureau of P roh ibition w i l l accomplish the resu lts desired by the Congress and this Department, is not one that can be answered without a thorough-going survey o f the en tire f i e l d , fo r I assume, of course, that i f any such large sum is to be appropriated, the Congress w i l l desire i t to be used with the utmost effectiven ess and in a way calcu lated to bring about the grea test resu lts. For instance, one o f the major d i f f ic u lt i e s encountered in making the pro** h ib itio n laws tru ly e ffe c t iv e is the congestion in the United States courts « 7 - 2 - occasioned in la rge part by numerous pending p roh ib ition cases. I t would seen desirable, therefdro, i f the Congress deems i t advisable to appropriate an ao.ditional sum of $25$ 000* 000 fo r th is general purpose, that some con sideration should be given to whether a part of th is Sum at le a s t should not be a llocated to tne Department o f Ju stice. As to the needs o f the De partment of ¿fustico I dm; of dolirso, not in a p o sitio n to express an opinion. iO.10 problem of smuggling is an important ono. It s prevention is la rg e ly dependent, in so fa r as our sea coast is concerned, on the adequacy o f tho f l e e t maintained by the Coast Guard and in part on an adequate Customs fo rce at our various ports; and in so fa r as our land borders are concerned, on an e ffe c t iv e ipatrol of the borders. On account of our fa ilu r e thus fa r to socuro a sa tisfa cto ry agreement with Canada, which, in my opinion, would m a terially reduce the liq u or t r a f f i c coming over the Canadian border, the necessity of a thorough-going survey as to tho best means of increasing the e ffectiven ess o f our border p a tro l is apparent. This the Department has recen tly undertaken. In so fa r as the Coast Guard is concerned, some time ago I instructed. Admiral B illa r d to submit a report as to the adequacy of the present Coast Guard f l e e t , together with an estimate o f the Coast Guard bu ilding needs over the period o f the next fiv e years. The problem of securing the necessary personnel under the provision s of e x is tin g law applying the C iv il Service to the Bureau of Proh ib ition and Customs Border P a tro l must likew ise be taken into consideration. Up to the present tin e , i t has been possible to make permanent appointments fo r only a portion of tne service and i t is anticipated that m/iny months w i l l elapse be fo re tne provisions of the C iv il Service Act can be f u l l y applied through- the furnishing of adequate e lig ib le re g is te rs fo r the present p o sitio n s. -3~ In so fa r as the Bureau of P roh ib ition i t s e l f is concerned, sone additional funds could he advantageously used at the present tin e in increased in vestiga tio n a l a c t iv it ie s and in a w ell-considered education al program* Looking to the future, i t w ill no doubt be advantageous to provide additional funds fo r increased border p a tro l o f the Customs Ser vice and an increased Customs fo rce at some of the p rin cip a l ports of entry, and increased equipment fo r the Coast Guard. The Department desires, o f course, to see every reasonable pro v is io n made fo r the adequate enforcement o f the law, but I do not b elie ve that any such la rge sum as is provided fo r in the present D eficiency B ill should be appropriated u n til the surveys above suggested have been com p leted and u n til i t can be determined how any increased amounts can be most w isely and e f f e c t iv e ly expended. In other words, I am not prepared to say that p roh ib ition enforcement can not be made more e ffe c t iv e by the ex penditure of increased amounts fo r th is purpose, but I do fe e l that no such appropriations should be made u n til they can be d e fin it e ly a llo ca ted to certain s p e c ific purposes, and that any other method o f procedure 7/ ill n ecessarily resu lt in the extravagant use o f the public funds» Very tru ly yours, A. W. MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury. POE RELEASE, MORNIH& PAPERS, Monday, January 14, 1929* uht REFUNDS? An in terview with Honorable Henry Herrick Bond, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury tfhy Refunds? In an interview- today, .Henry H errick Bond, Assistant Secretary o f the Treasury, explained in d e ta il why refunds of taxes are made. A summary of h is statements fo llo w s. Attention has "been focussed recen tly upon the refunding of fed era l taxes* During the fis c a l year ending June 30, 1928, there were about 168,000 refunds o f internal revenue taxes, p rin c ip a lly income taxes, which : ranged in amounts from 1^ to $3,600„0C0. The refunds to ta lle d $142,393,567.17 so i t w i l l he seen that the average amount was approximately $8,500. For the-current fis c a l year $130,000, <100 was o r ig in a lly appropriated fo r this purpose and Congress has now been asked fo r an additional $75,000,000. A very proper question is raised in the minds of the p u b lic. The public is e n title d to know why taxes which have once been paid are being refunded or paid back. The answer is simple. The system prescribed by Congress fo r the c o lle c tio n of fed era l revenues is based upon the proposition that the needs of the government demand and ju s t ify an insistence upon immediate payment o f taxes. Ary dispute over the amount to be paid must not be permitted to postpone payment. s e ttle d th e re a fte r. I t can be The soundness of th is long-established p o lic y is not open to question (though i t has been relaxed considerably by the creation o f the Board o f Tax Appeals). The conveniences o f the individual oust be subordinated to the public n ecessity. An obvious c o ro lla ry requires a re fund o f any payment in excess o f the amount fin a lly determined to have been due. The p rin cip al steps in administering an income tax are not d i f f ic u lt to understand. A taxpayer makes h is return, computes the amount he thinks is due, and pays. ned* His return is then audited and h is transactions exami One o f three resu lts fo llo w s: — ( l ) His return may be found correct, or (2 ) he may owe an additional amount, or (3 ) he nay have paid too much« I f the f i r s t , h is case is considered as closed, though of course i t may subsequently he reopened i f necessary; i f the second, we proceed to c o l le c t a d eficien cy; and i f the th ird , we proceed to refund or c red it against an amount owing fo r another year. I t is rather s ig n ific a n t that our co l le c tio n s of additional taxes fa r exceed our refunds of overpayments# fthy should a taxpayer ever overpay h is tax? question — Let me counter with a Do you understand every provision of our income tax law«?or, assuming you are a "super-expert», Does every one agree with your in te r pretation s and applications? answer# But you are e n title d to a more s p e c ific A few o f the more important reasons are: — Mathematical error; fa ilu r e to appreciate or present important fa c ts ; i^noranbe of the law; in a b ility to determine the j>roper in terp reta tio n of the law, because of com plexities, ambiguities, or omissions; payment in accordance with Treasury regulations or in terp retation s subsequently reversed, e ith e r by the Treasury i t s e l f or as a resu lt o f fin a l decisions of the Board o f T&x Appeals or the courts; le g is la tio n which has r e tr o a c tiv e ly reduced the tax l i a b i l i t y ; or a provision of the law is held to be u nconstitutional. During the war years, the Government was under the necessity o f c o l le c tin g more than 4 b i l l i o n d o lla rs annually, under an e n tire ly new form o f tax, from taxpayers having no- conception o f the meaning o f the law# C ollections had to be made. I t was at times necessary to be somewhat arb itrary in the prelim inary determinations. "Time was o f the essence", as the lawyers would say, and so the public poured.into the national treasury la rg e amounts, the le g a lit y o f which was in dispute. In part these pay ments were made because of the "payment f i r s t " p rin c ip le which I have described, and in part i t was due to patriotism . There was always, how** ever, the re a liz a tio n that u ltim ately these payments would be analyzed, - 3 - /y that correct in terpretation s would "be applied, and that a readjustment would be nade and overpayments promptly refunded* TJho should make the fin a l determination? Should i t be made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, a highly important and responsible o f f i c i a l of the Treasury, upon the advice of a corps o f experts and le g a l counsel, or should he shirk the re s p o n s ib ility and fo rce taxpayers in to the courts, facin g the costs and interminable delays of lit ig a t io n ? I am personally convinced that the determination and adjustment o f tax l i a b i l i t i e s must be prim arily an adm inistrative function. Our ju d ic ia l system, sorely burdened even now with calendars crowded with cases in which taxpayers have not agreed with the Government’ s determination, could not xoossibly survive i f any other course were pursued* The Board of Tax Appeals is years behind and i t reviews only additional tax determ inations and not refunds. I would be pleased indeed at an opportunity to present th is issue more fu lly to the public* But should the Commissioner h esita te and refuse to refund ju st be cause the amount is large? Most o f the discussion has been occasioned, I b e lie v e , by a refund of $15,000,000 to one taxpayer* I t has been frequently overlooked that th is taxpayer paid over $217,000,000 and that the net amount o f i t s taxes fo r the year involved is in excess o f $173,000,000* Suppose we were ta lk in g in terms of thousands rather than m illio n s, would anyone question or c r it ic iz e ? Should we pay in te rest upon an amount which a court would c le a r ly d irect us to refund? I would approve without fe a r any settlement c le a r ly in the best in terests o f the Government. Cases of th is kind are most c a re fu lly considered* The Treasury is fu lly appreciative of it s duty, as trustee fo r a l l tax payers, to guard zealously the p u b lic ’ s in te re s ts . amount is refunded pursuant to court decisions. By fa r the greater I am confident that tax— - 4 - payers who have obtained refunds w ill t e s t ify that i t is no simple under, taking to convince the Treasury o f f i c i a l s that the refund was properly i allow able. Re rust not overlook the size o f the job ca rried on by the Bureau of Internal Revenue. The Bureau has c o lle c te d since 1917 almost $39,000,000,000; has assessed more than $4,000,000,000 of back taxes, and has refunded almost $1,000,000,000. The to ta l refunds made during the past 12 years and 3 months ($975,012,356.33) are only approximately 24 per cent o f the to ta l amount of additional assessments and c o lle c tio n s resu ltin g from o ffic e % audits and f i e l d in vestiga tion s ($4,061,769,209.91) which have been made during the sane period, and but 2.5 per cent, approximately, of the to ta l internal-revenue receip ts during the period in question ($38,715,757,522.36). I t should be remembered that most of these refunds have been with, respect to the excess p r o fit s tax years 1917 to 1921, in clu sive, and therefore re funds in future years should stea d ily diminish. TJhy refunds? e n title d . Simply because we fin d we have money to which we are not Re may learn th is from the taxpayer him self, we m y learn i t from our own examination o f h is return, or we may be to ld by the authorita t iv e voice o f the court. To magnify th is fa c t and d is to rt i t is u n fair. Emphasis rather should be la id upon the cred ita b le record o f the Bureau in c o lle c tin g additional taxes fa r in excess of the amount of refunds in each year, and upon the w illin gn ess of the Bureau to assume the res}3on sibility o f closin g cases once and fo r a l l . W i* i STATEMENT BY UNDEiiSECHETABY 0? THE THEASIH? OGDEN L. MILLS • For immediate relea se. At the morning conference held, at Mr. Hoover* s home th is morn ing and attended “by Mr. H i l l , State Chairman Machold and myself, the general s itu a tio n 1of the Republican Party in New York was d is cussed. There was general agreement that Messrs, Machold, H ille s , and H ill could be r e lie d on to take a l l of the steps necessary to insure cooperation and harmony among party leaders, with a view to building up and strengthening party leadership and organization. l ’or release morning papers, Sunday, January 20, 1929» THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX SPEECH TO BE DEL IVEKED BY tMEESECxlETABY OF THE TREASURY MILLS BEFORE THE BAD ASSOCIATION OE THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ON SATURDAY EVENING, JANUARY 19, 1929, AT THE HOTEL ASTOR, NEW YORK CITY. In recent weeks we have heard much discussion o f the refunds o f Federal incops taxes, coupled with a suggestion, in sons quarters, that they constitute a "basis fo r c r itic is m and suspicion o f the administra t iv e p ractices o f the Treasury Department# The sound and wise adminis tra tio n o f our tax laws, and fa it h in the in te g rity and wisdom o f those who administer them, are o f such vast importance to our people that I fe e l that a discussion o f what the Treasury is seeking to accomplish in the way o f reform w ill be o f in terest to a group o f profession al men such as this* Let me say, however, that i t Is neither ny purpose nor desire to XDromote or encourage the more a c tiv e in terest o f lawyers as a class in income tax matters# Quite the contrary. From my standpoint, lawyers who lik e lit ig a t io n — those representing the Government as w ell as those repre senting taxpayers—have had a ltog eth er too much to do with the income tax, from the very outset# What was fundamentally an adm inistrative problem developed almost at once into an unlim ited and interminable series o f le g a l battles# The substitution o f administration fo r lit i g a t i o n is the essence o f our present income tax problem* Leaving aside the obvious p o lit ic a l aspects and motives, the most in terestin g featu re o f the recent C riticism o f the Treasury in connection with refunds is the insistence o f our c r i t i c s that, even though the Depart ment a ft e r carefu l consideration has- decided that the taxpayer has paid more - 2 - to the« G0verhnent than he should, under the law, nevertheless he must he com p e lle d to go to Court to obtain what i s r ig h t fu lly h is , Tflhat they would do, in snort, is to substitute our FedSrsi Judges fo r the executive o ffic e r s o f Government charged with the duty o f c o lle c tin g the revenue, and have the income tax law administered by the ju d ic ia l rather than the executive branch of Government, Such a proposal v io la te s every sound rule o f taxation and o f good government. I t is the very bog from which the Treasury seeks to ex tric a te the income tax. How did the recent discussion arise? The Commissioner o f Intofndl Hevenue decided that the United States Steel Corporation was e n t itle d to a re fund o f $15,000,000, plus in te re s t. To be sure, th is is a la rg e sum—which seems to me to be u tte r ly beside the point, even lea vin g out o f consideration tne fa c t that th is p a rticu la r taxpayer paid $173,000,000 in taxes fo r the year in question and that i f we were dealing in thousands, rather than m illio n s, and with some small corporation, rather than the Steel Corporation, the question in a l l human p ro b a b ility would never have been raised, T0 be sure, the $975,000,000 o f back tax refunds paid during the course o f the la s t twelve years is an immense sum, but the public is not to ld that during the same period the Government assessed more than 4 b illio n d o lla rs in back'taxes, and that re funds constitu te but 3g- per cent, o f the to ta l amount o f 39 b i l l i o n d olla rs c o lle c te d ,— a very good showing indeed i f you take into consideration the enormous d i f f ic u lt i e s o f the war and ea rly post-war period. Can i t f a i r l y bo contended that i t is quite proper fo r the Government, a fte r audit and review, to assess 4 b i llio n d o lla rs o f addition al taxes on the income taxpayers o f the Country, but when, by the employement o f the same pcbka&s, , the very same Government o f f i c i a l s determine that the taxpayers have paid more than they should, the l a t t e r should not be repaid except by virtu e o f a Court decision? Of course not. And i f I am rig h t, the obvious, sound and proper course to - 3 pursue i s fo r the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to assume the resp on sibility of making a decision, and when the decision is in favor of the taxpayer, to re fund the amount he determines to hare teen i l l e g a l l y collected. This doesn*t mean that.some cases, where re a lly doubtful points of law are involved, w ill not nave to be lit ig a t e d , but they should bd the exception and not the ru le. TJhat gives rise to refunds, and why should taxpayers ever overpay th eir tax? Under our income tax System, the taxpayer prepares h is return and pays h is tax as he estimates i t to be. Ih© Bureau o f Internal Revenue audits h is return and examines the various elements involved. I t then decides whether the return is correct or whether the taxpayer has overestimated or underestimat ed h is tax. I f underestimated, a deficiency is assessed; i f overestimated, he is en titled to a refund. The Bureau* s determination of a deficiency, of course, is not and should not,be fin a l; so that, i f he pays, he is then en titled to seek a Judicial determination and to claim a refund. Perhaps the best way to answer the second question, as to why any man should ever be g u ilty of the f o lly of paying more in taxes than he actually owes, is to give some actual illu s t r a tions. Case Ro* 1. Taxpayer A made h is return claiming a deduction of $600,000, which was h is pro rata share of the Hew York Transfer Tax as a legatee of a de ceased re la tiv e . Such a deduction was held improper by the Supreme Court in the case of geith v . Johnson. Thereafter the Revenue Act of 1928 was passed, and under the provisions of Section 703 such a tax, i f claimed as a deduction by the legatee and not by the estate, was made an allowable deduction to the le g a te e . Therefore a refund of $300,000 was made. Case. Ho. 2. Taxpayer B, on behalf of himself and the other stockholders, sold a l l the capital stock of a certain company, of which he personally owned two—thirds, fo r a net price of $20,000,000* to the stockholders, including the taxpayer. About $15,000,000 was distributed Th© remaining $5,000,000 was set aside to meet undetermined tax l i a b i l i t i e s of the coxporation. Later when these — 4 ** were determined the "balance o f th is $5,000,000 was d istribu ted to the stock holders« The taxpayer rexDorted h is share of th is balance in the year when he received i t . The Bureau ruled that i t was taxable in the year o f the o rig in a l sale o f the stock. Therefore a d eficien cy was assessed fo r the year o f sale, 1925, and an overassessment c e r t i f i e d fo r the year 1926, which was credited against the additional assessment fo r 1925. Case. Ho. 3« Taxpayer C, a ta x i corporation, o r ig in a lly claimed depre c ia tio n at the rate o f 1^ a m ile. Subsequently the adtual records o f the l i f e and to ta l mileage o f taxicabs showed that the correct rate o f depreciation was 2^ a m ile. These records were submitted and v e r ifie d and the result was refunds o f $40,000 fo r 1924 and $50,000 fo r 1925. Case« Ho. 4 . Taxpayer D, a steamship corporation, fa ile d to claim am ortization on i t s o rig in a l returns fo r 1918 and 1919. L ater, w ithin the tine as extended by Congress i t s e l f claims were duly f i l e d and a ft e r careful audit were allowed, g iv in g deductions o f $700,000 fo r 1918 and $300,000 fo r 1919. The resu lt was an overassessment o f $50,000 fo r 1918, which was cred ited against taxes fo r other years, and a small balance refunded, and $20,000 refunded fo r 1919. I t is apparent from these illu s tr a tio n s which were selected at random that neither the taxpayer nor the Government was to blame fo r the situ ation creatin g the necessity fo r a refund. In the f i r s t case, the, refund resu lted from a change in the law; in the second, from a m isinterpretation o f the law by the taxpayer; in thethird,£rom a more accurate ascertainment o f the fa c ts , which turned out to be more favorable to the taxpayer; in the fourth, to the fa ilu r e o f the taxpayer tponrh is return to take advantage o f a provision of law enacted by Congress fo r h is r e l i e f and la t e r extended to him. ïïhat I would emphasize is , that under a tax law which deals with such a great v a rie ty o f circumstances, reaches so many people, and produces so much revenue, even under the most favorable conditions, without any fa u lt on the part o f the - 5 — taxpayer or the actninistrato r s, cases must a rise where the taxpayer fin ds that he has e ith e r overpaid or underpaid the Government• I f the f i r s t , he is en t i t l e d to he repaid; i f the second* the Government is e n title d to an additional tax# In neither case is there any occasion fo r c r itic is m or f o r b e l i e f on the part o f the public that i t is confronted with anything abnormal, unexpected or alarming# Quite to the contrary. I f you were to examine our revenue laws, you would r e a liz e at once the many constantly recurring situ ation s which can bo met only by refunds, and the many provision s which can be administered, and must have been intended by Congress to be administered* solelj- by refunds. Further more, any system o f revenue c o lle c tio n under which payments are compelled p r io r to fin a l determinations must n ecessarily be based upon the p rin c ip le o f refund-* ing overpayments# This is true fo r instance o f the English system, which is frequ ently and properly pointed to as a model o f sound income tax administration, under which th e ir c re d its , drawbacks, and refunds amount to about 15 per cent of the collection s# Refunds are but a part o f a much la rg e r problem# The present discussion w ill have served a very useful purpose i f i t presents to the Country in a reasonably c le a r lig h t the very d e fin ite and simple issue: Should the income tax be treated as a l l other taxes, as an adm inistrative problem with re sp o n sib ility d e fin it e ly lodged in the proper, executive o ffic e r s , or is i t to be singled out and considered as not susceptible o f anything but ju d ic ia l in terp reta tio n and decision ! I n so fa r as I know, no other country has ever considered the assess ment and. c o lle c tio n o f income taxes through the ju d icia ry as necessary or a d visab le, nor do I know o f any case o f any one o f our States taking such a p o sition , though many o f them have enacted and enforced some extremely complicated tax l§ws, par t ic u la r ly in the f i e l d o f corporate taxation. Though in the State and City o f New York we raise annually immense sums through taxes, I have never heard i t suggested that we could not trust the decision and judgment o f our tax o f f i c i a l s , but must compel then to refer* a l l doubtful questions, whether o f law or fa c t, to I - 6 - the Courts» In the case o f the Federal Incone Tax, however, i t is undeniable that u n til recen tly there has been a very d e fin ite tendency to lean h eavily on the CotEfts. Adm inistrative o f f ic e r s ha#e been unw illing to assume the re s p o n sib ility o f making fin a l decisions. The Government has been in clin ed to s e ttle a l l doubtful points in i t s own fa v c r and fo rce the taxpayer to appeal to the Court fo r r e l i e f * while, on the othei* hand* the taxpayer, fin din g that the Government was prepared to l i t i g a t e a l l doubtful questions, found i t very much to h is advantage to do lik ew ise, perhaps a l l th is was unavoidable, considering the novelty o f the problems presented* the in tr ic a te fa c ts surrounding p r a c tic a lly every transaction o f importance, and the staggering amount o f the sums involved. In any event, the a ttitu d e o f both the taxpayer and the Government was in large measure responsible fo r much of the delay in s e ttlin g cases which has occasioned so much complaint, and fo r the protracted l i t i g a t i o n which we have come to associate with the Income Tax Law, thus depriving th is very sound method o f ra isin g revenue o f the two essen tial q u a litie s o f a sound tax, namely, certa in ty and promptness. Moreover, there grew up the strange f ic t io n that questions which by th e ir nature are not susceptible o f mathematical or lo g ic a l determination could be s e ttle d with mathematical accuracy and pure lo g ic — lea vin g no room fo r the exercise of judgment. Attempts were made to determine such questions as the valuation o f natural resources, the valuation o f intan gibles, the am ortization o f war f a c i l i t i e s , and the computation o f depreciation by*-the use o f '.fomqjilao^and with mathematical accuracy. There p ers is te d and p e r s is ts to-day the b e lie f that the determination o f a tax l i a b i l i t y can be determined in each case with precision and exactness, and i f the Bureau has any doubt as to i t s a b ilit y to reach th is id ea l, i t should l e t the B0ard o f Tax Appeals or the Courts attempt i t , How, the truth is that many questions cannot be solved with exact p r e c is io n and sound p o lic y demands that they should be disposed o f by adm inistrative action on the basis o f the best judgment o f competent o f f i c i a l s . I t is true, o f course, that important questions o f law must be l e f t to the Courts fo r determination, but. ?» 7 ** in so fa r as the great m ss o f problems that a rise are concerned, we cannot hope to s e t t le then by a series o f le g a l decisions* Experience has. shown that condi tion s are so varied, complex and chaagii^ t M t hardly a day goes by wif&ouf developing some now problem only remotely re la te d to those already decided# A fin a l court decision fiv e years from today is o f no help in reaching presentday determinatioxis# But, lea vin g aside a l l argument and theory, here are some fa c ts which in dicate c le a r ly enough the danger which threatens the income tax in th is country, a danger which no true frien d o f the system can a ffo rd to minimize# A ft e r a strenuous and successful e ffo r t to bring the work o f the Bureau o f Internal Revenue to a current basis, a fte r disposing o f an accumulation o f 3,000,000 cases, in ac cordance with the old s t r ic t method, we found ourselves faced with over 22,00C cases, in volving over $700,000,000, pending before the Board o f Tax Appeals— f iv e years work, without taking into consideration new cases. was apparently not a l l that i t appeared to be. The clean-up in the Burear D iffic u lt cases were evid en tly be ing disposed of by d rivin g the taxpayer to the Board, there to wait in patience and uncertainty, fthat both the taxpayer and the Government want is to have the case s e ttle d and closed, not 3inply transferred from the Bureau o f Internal Revenue to the Board of Tax Appeals. Obviously, li t i g a t i o n is not the key to the successful administration o f a tax law, which each year reaches over 2,800,000 persons and produces annually over 2 b i l l i o n d o lla rs . Moreover, we found that the Government was successful in sustaining only about 50 per cent, o f the assessments appealed to the Board. What did th is show? I t showed c le a r ly enough that the ad m inistrative. o ffic e r s were f a i l i n g to assume the re s p o n s ib ility which was th eirs* The taxpayer was e n title d to many more decisions in h is favor than they were making# The trouble was not, as has been suggested, excessive use of d iscretion on the part of adm inistrative o ffic e r s , but a fa ilu r e to exercise courageously th e ir own judgment and to dispose of these cases without the n ecessity of Court action. J ~ 8 To allow such a condition to continue, and grow worse, was to subject the income tax law to such a storm of ju st c r itic is m as would in evita b ly bring i t in to disrepute. Accordingly, with the war years p re tty w ell back o f us, with every prospect that we had reached a period of s t a b ilit y where the law could be considered as in more or le s s permanent form, we determined to return to sound tax p rin cip les and to trea t the c o lle c tio n of an income tax as p rim arily an ad m in istrative rather than a le g a l problem. cases closed f a i r l y , promptly and f i n a l ly . The id ea l we are aiming at is to have We want to get away from the old s p ir it of claiming everything fo r the Government and le t t in g the taxpayer protect him self by l it ig a t io n . We want the taxpayer to meet us half-way in a sim ilar s p ir it of fa irn ess and with an appreciation that lit ig a t io n , both fo r him self and the Government, is the most u n sa tisfa cto iy and expensive method o f determine h is tax l i a b i l i t y . A l l we want o f him is what, under the law, he owes the Government« As a p la in n atter o f common sense, in the long run, how is that more amount/likely to be determined accurately and equitably? By mutual fa irn ess, frankness and f u l l disclosure at the sta rt, or by suspicion, secrecy, distru st and arbitrarin ess, ending in lit ig a t io n ? Always remember that, in the f i e l d o f taxation, promptness and certa in ty are frequently in fin it e ly more important than meticulous accuracy* Our immediate problem was to r e lie v e the Board o f Tax Appeals, whidh was in serious danger o f breaking down* In the summer o f 1927, the so-called Special Advisory Committee was created, to apply settlement methods not only to pending appeals but to cases in which a 60-day l e t t e r had been sent out* The Committee consists o f fourteen members, and a number o f conferees both in Wash ington and the fie ld * These conferees are c a re fu lly chosen and trained* They confer* with' the taxpayer and attempt prim arily to s e t t le cases where fa c ts are in disputé* The work accomplished during the course o f the la s t year has demonstrated the soundness and value o f such a method* In that p eriod the Commjkfctee has considered 5,748 appealed cases and 2,777 cases about to be appealed* ** 9 *■» Of the appeals# 3,288, and of the 60-*day le t t e r cases, 2,088, have been re-** commended fo r settlement* The combined Oases proposed fo r settlement resulted in additional assessments totalin g almost $37,000,000* Th© success of th is Committee was such that early la s t year plans were perfected fo r the creation of a sim ilar agency in the General Counsel* s Office to attempt sim ilar settlement work in cases involving prim arily questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact# * Many cases involved a number of issues, each of which is a f a i r ly close question of law without procedure, and not of general importance* On some of these questions the Bureau may p ro fita b ly y ie ld in exchange fo r sim ilar concessions by the taxpayer* It i s , in a word, the introduction into the realm of tax administration of a businesslike method fo r adjusting disputes* unprofitable L itig a tio n i s proving expensive and, on the average, both, to the taxpayer mid to the government» Settlement methods serve to keep the tax problem on an administrative b a s is , where i t belongs, to reach resu lts promptly, with benefit to the Government and the taxpayer, and in the long run to produce more revenue* These two agencies, no matter how of** fective they may prove to be, are necessarily lim ited in the scope Of their a c t iv it ie s , but the success of th eir e ffo r t s , the educational work which they are s a tis fa c to rily contributing by bringing the conferees and auditors into direct contact with them, the exchange of. auditors, meetings fo r general dis cussion and the reading of the Committee* s recommendations in sp e c ific cases, are a l l contributing to the introduction of a new point of view and a new method of approach to the solution of th eir problem in the Bureau i t s e l f * If lit ig a t io n i s to be avoided, i f tax cases are to be settled with promptness and certainty, the ultimate re sp o n sib ility must d e fin ite ly of Internal Revenue* rest on the Bu.re«u I t s employees must recognize that resp o n sib ility and be w illin g to assume i t , and they must receive the wholehearted support and en couragement of- those at the top* There need be no fe a r of la x it y , careless ness or fa ilu r e to protect the in terests o f the Government* If© are" proceeding Of the appeals, 3,288, and o f the 60-day l e t t e r cases, 2,088, have been re commended fo r settlement* The combined cases proposed fo r settlement resulted in additional assessments to ta lin g almost $37,000,000* The success o f th is Committee was such that ea rly la s t year plans were p erfected fo r the creation o f a sim ilar agency in the General Counsel* s O ffice to atter.pt sim ilar settlement work in cases in volvin g prim arily questions of law and nixed questions o f law and fa c t . v Many cases involved a number o f issues, each o f which is a f a i r l y close question o f law without procedure, and not o f general importance. On some o f these questions the Bureau may p r o fita b ly y ie ld in exchange fo r sim ilar concessions by the taxpayer. I t is , in a word, the introduction into the realm o f tax administration o f a businesslike method fo r adjusting disputes* L it ig a t io n is proving expensive and, on the average, unprofitable * both to the taxpayer and to the government. Settlement methods serve to keep the tax problem on an adm inistrative basis, where i t belongs, to reach resu lts promptly, with b en efit to the Government and the taxpayer, and in the long run to produce more revenue. These two agencies, no matter how e f fe c tiv e they may prove to be, are n ecessarily lim ite d in the scope o f th e ir a c t iv it ie s , but the success o f th e ir e ffo r t s , the educational work which they are s a tis fa c to r ily contributing by bringing the conferees and auditors into d irect contact with them, the exchange o f auditors, meetings fo r general dis cussion and the reading o f the Committee*s recommendations in s p e c ific cases, are a l l contributing to the introduction o f a new poin t o f view and a new method o f approach to the solution o f th e ir problem in the Bureau i t s e l f * If lit ig a t io n i s to be avoided, i f tax cases are to be s e ttle d with promptness and certa in ty , the ultim ate re s p o n s ib ility must d e fin it e ly o f In tern al Revenue. rest on the Bureau I t s employees must recognize that re s p o n s ib ility and be w illin g to assume i t , and they must re ceive the wholehearted support and en couragement of. those at the top. There need be no fe a r o f la x it y , careless ness or fa ilu r e to p rotect the in te rests o f the Government* We are proceeding fimSuiar FOE IIIMEDIATE HELEASE, Monday, January 21, 1929. Secretary?- Mellon to-day sent the fo llo w in g l e t t e r to Bishop Janes Cannon, J r ,, of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. THE SECHETAEF OF THE TKEASUHT Washington, January 21, 1929. dear Bishop Cannon; I beg to acknowledge receip t o f your telegram of January 18th in which you suggest that the appropriation o f $25 ,000,000 fo r the P roh ib ition Bureau as contam ed m the so -ca lled Harris amendment to the F ir s t D eficien cy B i l l be made ava ila b le so as to be expended as the Secretary o f the Treasury nay determine, and in which you also suggest that the zeal on the part o f the Secretary o f the Treasury to secure adequate enforcement nay w ell be questioned i f he refuses the opportunity o ffe re d by the Harris amendment. As I pointed out in ny l e t t e r o f January 13th to Senator Warren, proh ib ition enforcement does not rest s o le ly upon the Bureau.of P roh ib itio n , but i t s success depends la rg e ly on the cooperation afforded by the Coast Guard, the Customs Service, and the Border P a tro l, and, what is even o f more v i t a l importance, on the p o s s ib ilit y o f bringing to t r i a l oases prepared by the P roh ib ition Bureau and ready fo r t r i a l . What I endeavored to point out in ny l e t t e r to Senator Warren is that the Harris amendment makes the additional funds ava ila b le to the P roh ibition Bureau only and r e s t r ic t s the uses by that Bureau, with no d iscretion in the Secretary o f the Treasury. There are now 31,000 liq u o r oases pending m the Federal courts and causing congestion, with no r e l i e f in sight. The • ° mS ®erv^oe needs additional guards in the p rin cip a l ports and the Border Patrol needs strengthening, while in so fa r as the Coast Guard is concerned, Admiral B illa rd is at present undertaking a survey as to the ships needed to replace a number o f destroyers whose usefulness has been p r e tty nearly exhausted, 804 iS prepare<i t0 necomnend an increase in the commissioned personnel o f the Coast G-uard. . The H arris amendment would not make funds ava ila b le fo r any o f these purposes, nor could the additional money provided fo r be used fo r the educational purposes which you emphasize in your telegram. Under these circumstances, can i t bo f a i r l y said that an appropriation o f $25,000,000, made with these re s tric tio n s , would o f i t s e l f constitu te an i n t e l l i gent and e ffe c t iv e means o f promoting proh ib ition enforcement? I note that in your telegram you suggest that the re s tric tio n s be removed and that $25,000,000 be made a va ila b le to the Secretary o f the Treasury to spend aâ .0 sees f i t . This, o f course, is not the H arris amendment now pending in Coil- gress, and aside from the fa c t that i t would make no provision whatsoever fo r r e lie v in g the congestion in the courts, which to-day constitu tes one of the major problems in the f i e l d o f p roh ib ition enforcement, I want to suggest whether you consider i t good p ra ctice to place so vast a sun in the hands o f a public o f f i c i a l v/ith unlim ited d iscretio n as to i t s use? I t makes no d ifferen ce whether that o f f i c i a l be the Secretary o f the Treasury or some other c h ie f o f an Executive Department o f Government^ I do not b elieve that adequate p rotectio n of the public in terests and the proper safeguards that should always surround the expenditures of public funds can f a i r l y be said to have been provided fo r i f an appropriation o f th is character is made. Such a program would break down the safeguards o f the Budget System, and the e ffe c t iv e and proper control which Congress exercises over tne expenditure o f the public funds. I think that upon second consideration you w ill r e a liz e that th is is not a minor question but a fundamental one, and that in the long run, whether in the proh ib ition f i e l d or in any other f i e l d o f governs ment, in fin it e ly more is lo s t than gained i f fo r the sake o f accor.plishing im mediately a purpose, no matter how desirable, a fundamental government and sound p ractice is vio la te d » Bishop James Cannon, J r ., Methodist Episcopal Church South, B lis s Building, Washington, D. C. Sincerely yours, A. W. MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury. Dod treasury dèfarîmtt FOR RELEASE MORNING FAPERS Tuesdajr, Jan* 22, 1929* Secretary Mellon to-day made public the fo llo w in g id en tica l le t t e r s a&dressed by him to the president o f the Senate and the Speaker o f the House o f Repre sentat ive s* THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, Washington, January 21, 1929# Ity dear Mr.' President ( Speaker): In my Annual Report fo r the fis c a l year 1928, submitted to the Congress la s t December, re fe rrin g to the question o f whether the National Bank notes now in circu la tio n should be re tire d , I said as fo llo w s; "In a l l p ro b a b ility a conclusion as to the possible re tirement o f the national-bank c ircu la tio n , through exercise o f the c a ll p r iv ile g e attaching to the 2 per cent consols which a rise s a ft e r A p ril 1, 1930, w ill be reached before the department can issue national-bank notes in the reduced size# The Federal Reserve Act o r ig in a lly contemplated the r e t ir e ment o f the national-bank currency. The problems was dis cussed f u l l y in the annual report fo r 1924* Considerable tin e having elapsed, i t is f e l t advisable to submit the matter to the Congress fo r decision at the present session# In the event national-bank notes are continued in d e fin ite ly as a part of the money circu la tio n o f the United States, the Treasury w i l l be prepared to apply the new designs to such notes and to make them a va ila b le in the reduced size within a reasonable time a ft e r the issue of other kinds o f currency in the reduced s iz e ." The question has received the thorough study and consideration o f th is department, and I have concluded that i t would be inadvisable to submit to Con gress at th is time a program looking to ea rly retirement of our National Bank note c ircu la tio n . Accordingly, when the new-size paper currency is issued, on or about July 1, 1929, the Treasury Department w ill be prepared sh ortly th erea fter to make a vailable National Bank notes in the reduced s iz e . Sincerely yours, A. W. MELLON, Secretary o f the Treasury TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR EEUSASB, MOKHIHG- PAPERS, Wednesday, January 23, 1929. Secretary o f the Treasury Mellon today made public h is l e t t e r to Honorable Reed Smoot',. Chairman, Senate Finance Committee, regarding Senator McKellar*s b i l l fo r the review o f tax refunds, c re d its , and abatements by the Board o f Tax Appeals. "January 22, 1929. My dear Mr# Chairman.; % There is pending in :th e Senate a b i l l o ffe re d by Senator McKellar, S* 5319, the substance of which has also been o ffe re d as an amendment to the Treasury D eficiency B i l l . The b i l l and amendment both provide that a l l claims f o r refund, c red it or abatement o f an in tern al revenue tax involving more than $10,000 sh all, before payment, be c e r t if ie d to the B0ard o f Tax Appeals fo r review and determination and that upon the disallowance o f any claim involving more than the said amount the taxpayer shall have the right o f axopeal to said Board. The said b i l l fu rth er provides that a l l claims fo r not more than $10,000 shall only be refunded, cred ited or abated under regulations prescribed by said Board. This b i l l is o f such a revolutionary character and, in my judgment so unwarranted, that I submit the fo llo w in g fa cts fo r your consideration, inas much as tho Committee on Judiciary, to which the b i l l was re ferred , reported the matter favorably without asking th is Department fo r it s recommendations# The prox>osal is so fundamentally unsound that i t should not require ex tended argument to demonstrate the fa c t . In the f i r s t place, i t would in crease the volume of work of an important Board, already so overloaded that two years ago i t s very existence was threatened, and, in the second place, i t would u tte rly change the character o f th is Board by converting i t from a quasi—ju d ic ia l body passing upon disunited issues in to a body with purely ad m in istra tive powers# The Board of Tax Appeals has during i t s fou r years o f existen ce, been unable to cope with the vast flo w o f appeals on asserted d e fic ie n c ie s . On June 30, 1925 there were 3,494 appeals awaiting t r i a l ; on June 30, 1928, 21,639# During the past eighteen months the Treasury Department has made h eroic e ffo r t s to reduce the accumulation. The peak was reached on May 31, 1928, when 22,061 cases were ponding# These have been reduced to 20,079 on December 31, 1928# However, i t is apparent that at le a s t three years o f most strenuous endeavor by a l l concerned are s t i l l required to mako the Board current on i t s work. This condition has arisen with th e ir ju ris d ic tio n lim ite d to d e fic ie n c ie s * How i t is proposed to increase th e ir work by g iv in g them the review o f a l l refunds, abatements and c red its over $10,000, and adm inistrative control over a l l other refunds, abatements and c re d its . - 2 - How much would this increase th eir work? In the fis c a l year 1926 the Hoard disposed of 3*085 bases a fte r hearings on the merits. This is a f a i r measure of their output at the present time. And yet there were 4,052 claims fo r refunds in excess of $10,000 passed upon by the Bureau of Internal Revenue in that year, of which, under Senator H cK ollar's b i l l , 1,636 which woro allowed would have had to be reviewed by the Board, and the 2,416 rejected would have had the right to appeal to the Board* In addition there webe numerous claims fo r abatement and cred iti It is therefore cle a r that this b i l l would more Ihah double the present Work of the Boabdl I t is useless to estimate whether th is would delay bring ing the ii* present wobk to a current bhsis* because i t is so c le a rly evident that the Bo^rd would bo completely buried in a volume of work from which i t could never emerge* I f i t were to dispose of appeals now pending (without reference to those f i l e d h ereafter) before considering refunds, these refunds, amounting probably to at le a st $75,000,000 annually, would wait at le a st three years fo r refund by the Board and fin a l payment* This would mean that on such an estimated amount additional interest to ta llin g $13,500,000 annually would soon be accruing, - an en tirely needless expense, - to say nothing of the hard ship to the taxpayers of the country who would be deprived fo r over three years of the use of th is money to which they would be c le a rly e n title d and would be compelled to borrow i t elsewhere i f they could secure credit* I f refunds were to be given precedence over pending cases the Government would postpone fo r years the collection of large amounts of back taxes to which i t is now e n title d and the reduction in revenue would have to be made up from other sources in the meantime* P u lly as serious is the fa c t that the proposal would completely change the character of the B0ard and the nature of it s work* The Board of Tax Ap peals is a q u a si-ju d ic ia l body* I t functions as a court, passing upon dis puted issues a fte r hearing witnesses and the arguments of counsel* This b i l l would transfer to then purely administrative duties, - the review of matters upon which the p a rtie s are in f u l l agreement, with respect to claims allowed by the Commissioner* It would also give them administrative control of a l l refunds, however small, through the power of issuing regulations* In a l l of the recent discussion in the Congress and elsewhere there has been no suggestion that refunds were being made dishonestly* Why, then, should the administrative duty now imposed in the Commissioner of Internal Revenue be v irtu a lly trans fe rre d to the Board of Tax Appeals? What reason is there to believe that a member of this Board is better f it t e d to pass upon these administrative pro blems than the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue* A stable Government must rest upon the confidence of it s people* High administrative o ffic e r s must be entrusted with resp o n sibility and on th eir good fa it h , proven by the test of time, the people must rest* Responsibility must be placed somewhere under our taxation system* Obviously i t should be placed in those high administrative o ffic e rs whose positions were created fo r the purpose of the enforcement of the law* Nothing is gained by superimposing a sem i-judicial review of such administrative action in «ill cases* On the contrary it would be a mere tran sfer of resp o n sib ility , at a large interest cost, increased administrative expense, and would in f lic t a serious blow to the morale of the Bureau of Internal Revenue* I f the Commissioner and h is experienced and trustworthy assistants cannot be entrusted with this respon sibility they should not be trusted with any resp on sibility whatever under an income tax law, because the resp o n sibility - 3 - fo r making refunds is no grea ter than the re s p o n s ib ility fo r c o lle c tin g ad d itio n a l taxes. Their fa it h fu l devotion to the in terests o f the Government has been proven during too long a period to require defense, I can, th erefore, only suggest that the person who would propose tran sferrin g the re sp o n sib ility fo r these refunds to other o ffic e r s would probably within a short period o f tin e make a sim ilar attack upon the R0 a rd .of Tax .Appeals and, pointin g to the la rg e anmmt being refunded by the hoard, demand that the power to refund be tran sferred to some other person or g*oup, ho proof has been o ffe re d to show any improper payments. There is no evidence o f maladministration, corruption or improper practices'. There is nothing to indicate that the present machine zy is not functioning smoothly and with adequate p rotection to the in terests o f the Government, Why, then, when i t has been determined that a taxpayer has paid more than he ought, should he be compelled to wait three years in order to have h is case reviewed by a semi—ju d ic ia l body? The real issue is whether the income tax is to be administered by the executive branch o f the Government in accordance with every precedent and every sound p rin c ip le o f Government, or is to be turned over to the ju d ic ia l branch, I have no h esita tio n in prophesying that the la t t e r course spells the complete breakdown o f the income tax. Any tax that cannot be administer ed save by means o f l i t i g a t i o n and court decision cannot long survive, Yery tru ly yours, A. ÏÏ. MILLON Secretary o f the Treasury. Honorable Reed Smoot, C-iairman, Senate Finance Committee. 11 TREASURY DEPARTMENT.. _ r S^ r ° i n S °f th° Treasur5r Mollor. today made January 24, 1929, to Chairman Anthony o f the House Appropriations, as fo llo w s: FOR immediate release , Wednesday, January 30 1929. public his le t t e r of Committee on January 24, 1929. My dear Mr. Chairman: The Senate, on Tuesday of this week, adopted the fo llo w in g amendment to the D eficiency Appropriation B i l l : ’’For increasing the enforcement fo rce, $24,000,000, or such part tnereof as the President may deem useful* to he a llocated by the President, as he may see f i t , to the departments or bureaus charged with the enforcement of the national p roh ibition act, and to remain a va ila b le un t i l June 30, 1930.” ls ^¿©rstanding that in order to make p roh ibition enforcement more e ffe c t iv e the Senate intended to provide additional funds fo r certain purposes, such o,s; the r e l i e f of the congestion in the courts; increasing the f l e e t , equipment, and personnel of the Coast Guard; increasing the effe i tiveness o f the Customs S ervice, including the Border P a tro l; and increasing the personnel o f the Bureau o f Proh ib ition and the Department o f Justice; and that inasmuch as i t was impossible d e fin it e ly to a llo c a te the sums to be spent fo r certain s p e c ifie d purposes at this time, the addition al funds provided were to be a llo ca ted as the President in his d iscretio n might decide, I f e e l that i t is my duty to point out to you that an examination of the amendment reveals that i t w ill not accomplish the purposes intended. The appropriation w ill not be a va ila b le fo r any of the purposes above enumerated, except increasing personnel of the Bureau o f P roh ib ition and the Department of Justice, nor w ill i t he a va ila b le fo r the conduct o f an educational program which may have been contempla-ted-« The amendment as adopted provides funds ,ffo r increasing the enforcement fofcfc . Granting that the language should be construed most lib e r a lly and *Y / - 2 - in the lig h t o f the desired ends which the Senate was seeking to accorri-* p lis h , X fe a r that the appropriation would not he availab le fo r more than an increased personnel* Even such essen tial inciden tal expenses n ecessarily accompanying an increased personnel, such as rent, o ffic e equipment. and supplies, and tra v e lin g expenses could not he paid from i t * •Again, the President may a llo c a te the appropriation, fo r thè above purpose, only "to the departments o f bureaus charged with the enforcement of the^ national p roh ibition a c t," Only the Department of Justice and tne Bureau of P roh ioitio n of the Treasury Department q u a lify under this language* Neither the Judiciary, the Coast Guard, the Customs Service, nor the C iv il Service Commission is included, I bring this matter to your atten tion ip order that the true intent of Congress may be accurately expressed before the b i l l is enacted into law, i f i t is determined that addition al funds should be appropriated. Very tru ly yours, A. W, MELLON Secretary of the Treasury, Hon, D, R, Anthony, Chairman, Committee on Appropriations, House o f Representatives, 2K ^ TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, February 7,1929 Secretary o f the Treasury Mellon today made public his le t t e r to Honorable Francis E. Warren, Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations, regarding a Senate amendment dealin g with hearings on tax refunds in excess o f $1 0 , 0 0 0 . "January 29, 1929* My dear Mr* Chairman: I submit the fo llo w in g fo r your consideration in connection with the Senate amendment to the F ir s t D eficien cy Appropriation B i l l providing as fo llo w s : *That no part of the fundus herein appropriated fo r tax refunds where the claim is in excess o f $10,000 sh all he paid out except upon hearings before any com m ittee or o ffic e r in the Department conducting the same, which hearings sh a ll be open to the public, and the decision sh all be a public document*$ The portion of the amendment which provides fo r public hearings is open to serious objection . In the judgment o f the responsible o f f i c i a l s o f this Department, this proposal is not consistent with sound adm inistrative practice# In order that the e ffe c t o f the proposal may be c le a r ly seen and the n ecessity fo r i t c o rre c tly estimated, l e t me review b r ie fly the usual procedure on a claim fo r refund. A fte r a claim fo r refund is f i l e d by a taxpayer, i t regu larly goes to the o ffic e o f the Revenue Agent in Charge in the taxpayer^ d is t r ic t and is assigned to an agent fo r examination. Conferences are held with the taxpayer or his representative, the necessary examinations of the taxpayer»s books and papers made, and a report prepared. This report is then reviewed in the o ffic e o f the Revenue Agent in Charge and is fi n a l ly submitted to the Revenue Agent in Charge. Further conferences in his o ffic e may be held* It he approves, the papers are forwarded to the Income Tax Unit in Washington and assigned to an auditor fo r complete review and con sideration . The auditor*s conclusions must then be reviewd and approved by his superiors before a fin a l decision is reached. Frequently fu rther conferences with the taxpayer or his representat iv e are necessary. I f the claim is in excess o f $50,000, the en t ir e f i l e is sent to the General Counsel*s O ffic e and there assigned to a special group fo r another complete review and again conferences may be held with the taxpayer at this stage. The work o f the attorney or attorneys who make th is review is then submitted to the head o f the d iv is io n and, i f approved, then to the General counsel or one o f his assistants fo r fin a l approval. In every - 2 ~ important case the f i l e and recommendations go to the Commissioner^ o ffic e where the Commissioner or one o f his assistants reviews the case. In addition, i f the amount allowed is in excess of $75,000, the General Counsel, before transm itting the f i l e to the Commissioner, prepares a complete statement o f the case which is submitted to the Joint Congressional Committee on In tern al Revenue Taxation and the matter held in abeyance fo r the th irty-d a y period provided by law. During that time the s t a ff of the Joint Con gressional Committee examines the claim and i f they have any doubt as to the p rop riety o f it s allowance present th e ir views, eith er by l e t t e r or conference, to the General Counsels O ffic e fo r reconsideration. I t w i l l thus be seen that no claim is allowed as a resu lt o f the action of one or two individuals but that on the contrary every ¿lain? has to run the gauntlet of thorough and complete audits, examinations, and le g a l review by a s t a ff of competent men, certain of them e s p e c ia lly chosen and trained fo r th is work# I t is my opinion that this sytem completely end adequately protects the Government*s interests# Wj tn th is pictu re of the procedure in mind i t is d i f f ic u lt to see the exact point at which a public hearing could properly be in jected . Surely the Congress would not contemplate a requirement that a l l these proceedings be open to the public, including the i n i t i a l conference o f the revenue agent in the taxp ayer^ o ffic e in his examination of the books. Each of the subsequent proceedings are steps in the Departments e ffo r ts to reach a correct conclusion by ordinary adm inistrative p ra ctices. There is no point in the procedure fo r formal arguments and the presentation of evidence as in a court of law or before the Board o f Tax Appeals. The record consists of evidence submitted from time to time by the taxpayer, frequ ently in a ffid a v it form with his claim and sometimes furnished at a la te r point in the form o f fu rth er a ffid a v it s and documentary proof; of fa cts obtained by the revenue agent from examinations of the taxpayer*s books and papers; at times of reports o f agents o f the In te llig e n c e U nit; and frequently o f reports o f engineers sent to make examinations o f the condition or value o f tangible property. The conferences consist o f informal discussions o f the fa cts thus established and the application of the law thereto. The record in each case is n ecessarily an accumulation of work ex tending frequ en tly over a long period of time. I t is misleading to speak o f the present procedure as a secret one. Conferences between the only persons who have any re a l in te re s t in the matter should not be ca lle d secret simply because the id ly curious are not p r iv ile g e d to be present, or because the procedure does not permit the divulgence o f fa cts of in terest only to the taxpayer and the Government, or because i t does not authorize the presence of tax experts seeking information o f in te rest to possible prospective c lie n ts , or to competitors o f the taxpayer. There is a read purpose accomplished by the provisions o f the act forbidding such discle.sures* While certain large corporations may publish from time to time th e ir balance sheets, there are many smaller taxpayers, p a rtic u la rly new and stru gglin g corporations, whose business could be ruined, fo r the disclosure o f th e ir fin a n cia l p o sition would frequ en tly encourage u nfair business practices - 3 - designed to elim inate them from the f i e l d and possibly permit competitors to take advantage of perhaps a temporarily weak con d itio n . In addition, i t would reveal secret formulae, secret trade processes, a n d 'v ita l s t a t is t ic s , such as costs o f production,' Furthermore, i t must be borne in mind that taxable net income is an a rb itra ry fig u re often having but s lig h t re la tio n to the true business income of the concern, and seldom any re la tio n to the fin a n c ia l condition or standing of the taxpayer. Taxable net income may be g r e a tly in excess o f, or much less than, true in come. The publication, therefore, of taxable net income would n ecessarily be m isleading. I t might destroy public confidence in a w ell managed business, or might unfortunately establish an u n ju s tifie d confidence in the minds o f cred itors or in vestors. P a rtic u la rly would th is be probable since the pu blication of the figu res would n ecessarily be incomplete and fragmentary. Taxpayers should be permitted to contribute to the revenues o f the Government and adjust th e ir tax l i a b i l i t i e s without being forced to d isclose th e ir business a ffa ir s and p o lic ie s , of in te rest only to competitors and the curious, and without being subjected to the ris k o f improper and unwarranted deductions. Furthermore, in cases in volvin g the so -ca lled special assess ment provisions, the decision rests upon the data secured from com petitors 1 returns, and these companies could r ig h t ly object to publication o f th e ir fig u res when they have no pending claim. For the above reasons I re s p e c tfu lly urge that the provision fo r a public hearing on these matters be elim inated. Whether the fin a l decision of the Department should be made a public document or record presents a somewhat d iffe r e n t problem though i t would seem such action is open to most of the objections above enumerated. At the present time a l l the la rg er cases are form ally presented to the Joint Congressional Committee and a l l the records of the Department re la tin g to refunds are at a l l times open to the scrutiny of the members o f that committee and th eir agents. What more e ffe c t iv e safeguard can be provided? I am sending sim ilar le t t e r s to Senator Smoot, Chairman of the Committee on Finance, Congressman Anthony, Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations, Congressman Wood o f the House Committee on Appropriations, and Congressman Hawley, Chairman o f the Committee on Ways and Means and the Joint Committee on In tern al Revenue Taxation. Very tru ly yours, A. W. MELLON Secretary of the Treasury Honorable Francis E. Warren, Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate.“ Tor release, mornijjg pagers, February 26, 1929. Treasury pernrtnent. The G-overment and Architecture Speech o f Honorable Ogden L. M ills Undersecretary of the Treasury at the Annual Dinner of the Hew York Chapter of the American In s titu te of A rchitects Hew York February 25, 1929 , p 0 The Government and. Architecture I am v e iy glad indeed to have an opportunity to address the New York Chapter of the American In s titu te o f A rch itects, fo r the Treasury is under a debt o f gratitu de to you and to your national organization fo r the devoted and p a tr io tic service which you have ren dered in a great work on which we are now engaged in Washington. I re fe r to the beau tifyin g o f the n ation's c a p ita l and the part which the In stitu te has taken not merely in re vivin g in terest in that work but in helping to determine the lin es along which i t should be carried out. More than a quarter of a century ago, when the Centennial o f the establishment of the seat o f Government in the D is tr ic t o f Columbia was being celebrated, the American In s titu te o f A rch itects, then meeting in Washington, went on record in opposition to the p reva ilin g practice o f constructing public buildings without regard to the o rigin a l plan o f the City o f Washington or o f any established order or design. A great meeting was held in the White House on the in v ita tio n o f President McKinley, attended by the highest o f f i c i a l s of the Government and by the members o f the American In s titu te o f A rch itects. The D'Enfant plan was rescued from the o b livio n in which i t had reposed fo r nearly a hundred years and in terest in the whole subject was revived. As a resu lt of the meeting, the In s titu te , with the e ff ic ie n t cooperation o f Senator McMillan, secured the appointment o f an expert Commission, which should make an intensive study o f the needs and p o s s ib ilit ie s o f Washington and recommend a method fo r carrying th eir plans into e ffe c t . - 2 - That Commission, comprising such illu s trio u s names as McKira* Burnham, St. G-audens and Olmsted, subsequently made a report known as the Plan o f 1901, in which they recommended a return to the o rig in a l plan o f Washington and L 'In fa n t, with certain m odifications, p a rtic u la rly as regards the Mall and the development o f a system of outlying parks and boulevards. This was only the «beginning o f a long fig h t to carry these plans to execution. They were attacked with great b ittern ess in Congress as ex travagant and excessive. A fte r Senator McMillan*s death the movement was l e f t without a.leader in Congress; and i t remained fo r the In stitu te to make another e ffo r t at c r y s ta liz in g public sentiment in favor o f the Flan. it s meeting in Washington in 19<j 5 , At a dinner was held at which notable speeches were made bv Fresident Roosevelt, by Speaker Cannon and others who gave o f f i c i a l approval to the idea that the national capital should be en larged and b ea u tified and that public buildings were to be erected there a fte r only in accordance with an orderly and systematic plan. I t was a great service which the In s titu te rendered. There were many resu lts, o f which I sh all mention only the removal o f the unsightly railroad tracks from the Mall and the erection o f a b eau tifu l Union Station in accord ance with the Plans o f the Commission. Later on the Lincoln Memorial was b u ilt and other p rojects were being planned when the Great W-r intervened and a l l progress stopped. Temporary buildings sprang up overnight along the Mall and around the Union Station to house the grea tly increased a c t iv it ie s o f the Federal Govern ment, which were made so v i t a l l y necessary by the war. Construction o f beauti— - 3 fu l and. permanent buildings was a t a s ta n d s till; and there the situ ation continued u n til recen tly, when the Secretary o f the Treasury and the Post master tenoral, in accordance with a provision in the Public Buildings Act o f May 25, 1926, made a report to Congress regarding the need fo r the con stru ction o f public buildings throughout the country. Subsequently Con gress authorized a bu ildin g program o f $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ; and in addition $US,000,000 W ill be re a lize d through the sale o f old buildings and sites and w ill unquestionably be made a va ila b le. More w i l l be needed, and very shortly the Department w ill submit a complete survey to Congress. Of the buildings to be erected outside the D is tr ic t o f Columbia, nearly 300 buildings. are fo r post o ffic e buildings at places now without Federal Others are to replace old and inadequate Federal buildings, a n d s till others are fo r new buildings and extensions to present buildings and fo r hospitals and buildings fo r the Customs and Ijffnigration Services. The needs o f New York City have been recognized by the two Depart ments o f the Treasury and the Post O ffice , whose duty i t is to a llo c a te the a vailable funds. The greater New York p rojects which are now being considered fo r inclusion in this a llo c a tio n w i l l require an estimated t o ta l expenditure o f over $Ul,000,000. expenditure This amount is in addition to an recen tly made fo r a s it e and bu ilding fo r the A ppraiser’ s Stores at a to ta l cost o f approximately $7,600,000. In the case o f the Stapleton-Marine Hospital, i t is proposed to ac quire additional land and enlarge the present plant to provide a capacity of 600 beds with a view toward an ultim ate capacity o f estimated cost o f $2,500,000. s p e c ific authorization. 1 ,0 0 0 beds, at an This p roject is now before Congress fo r - 4 ?or the Annex Building to the general Post O ffic e , i t is proposed to acquire the "balance of the "block "bounded "by 8 th and 9th Avenues, 31st and 33d Streets and erect thereon an annex to the present general post o ffic e , at an estimated cost fo r s ite end "building o f $8,250,000. The Parcel Post Building is required fo r the addition al needs of the postal service and o ffic e quarters fo r a number of a c t iv it ie s now renting space. The G-overnnent has already contracted fo r the purchase of a block of land approximately 200 x 800 fe e t , located at 9th and 10th Avenues, 29th and 30th Streets, at a cost of $2,000,000. There is now before Congress an estimate of cost and request fo r the appropriation to commence con struction of a building on this s ite , the lim it of cost of the building being $9,000,000, which makes a to ta l outlay fo r this p roject of $11,000,000. This building and the Annex Building w ill provide the Post O ffic e with approximately 33 acres of additional flo o r space required fo r the proper handling of the mails in that part of Hew York* The Old Appraisers * Stores Building has been vacated and the a c t iv it ie s of the Appraisers transferred to the recen tly acquired buildings at Hudson, Varick, King and West Houston Streets, the to ta l cost of the new s it e and bu ildin g being approximately $7,600,000. The old Appraisers’ Stores Building is to be remodeled at a cost of approximately $500,000 and made ava ila b le fo r o ffic e and storage space fo r governmental a c t i v i t i e s . S p ecific le g is la tio n to carry out this p roject is now before Congress. L e g isla tio n has already been enacted providing fo r the addition to the Brooklyn P0st O ffic e and Court House, at an estimated cost of $2,700,000; and... $190,000 has been a lloca ted fo r the construction o f a post o ffic e on Staten Island. There is a very re a l need in Hew York C ity fo r proper accommodations ' fo r our Federal Courts. At the same time, the people o f Hew York City are anxious to have the Federal Government move the present Post O ffic e so as to make that s ite a va ila b le fo r park purposes in the neighborhood of City H a ll. Both the C ity a u th orities and the Federal o f f i c i a l s are earnestly endeavoring to work out a solution which w ill be acceptable both to the C ity and to the Federal Government. Just at present we are working on a plan which contemplates the erection of a Federal bu ildin g on the block bounded by Vesey, 3arclay, West Broadway, and Church S treets, in which would be housed the Post O ffic e , the Federal Courts and other Federal a c t iv it ie s now occupying rented space. Whether i t w i l l be possible to reach an agreement as to what compensation the C ity should allow the Federal Government fo r vacating the present Post O ffic e s ite , I am unable to say, but i t does seem as i f with a l i t t l e good w ill on both sides, an agreement could be reached* The Treasury Department also has under consideration the a d v is a b ility of tran sferrin g the Assay O ffic e to another s it e . The present s ite is rather too valuable to be held fo r Assay O ffic e purposes, and, moreoyer, there is some complaint o f the fumes. Our plans are,by no means perfected and a d e fin ite decision has not been reached, but in the meanwhile the - 6 - necessary authority is being requested of Congress so that the Treasury w ill he in a p o sitio n to proceed with such a program should i t appear to be desirable a fte r fin a l study. The carrying out o f this huge program requires a large and w e llorganized Jfiirce of arch itects and engineers. The force now employed by the o ffic e o f the Supervising A rch itect o f the Treasury Department is engaged in the preparation o f plans and sp ecifica tion s fo r projects not only in the D is tric t o f Columbia but throughout the country. Owing to the urgent needs fo r r e l i e f and the number o f major p ro je c ts , i t has been found advisable to acquire the services o f outside arch itects fo r several o f these important p rojects and i t is our b e lie f that additional help w ill have to be secured from lo c a l arch itectu ral firms in the la rg e r c it ie s where conditions appear to make this desirable. I t is in this work that we must re ly on help from you and from your fe llo w a rc h ite c ts lin other c itie s . Turning now to the great bu ilding program fo r the City of Washington, which I know is o f deep in te rest to you; Congress has authorized an expendi ture o f $75,000,000 and has d irected the Secretary o f the Treasury to acquire land and erect such public buildings as w i l l meet the Governments most pressing needs in housing various departments'-and governmental a c t iv it ie s . Several o f these buildings are now under way. A new and la rger bu ilding is being erected fo r the Department o f Commerce;-construction has begun on a building fo r the Department o f Agriculture and one fo r the Bureau of Internal Revenue. A building w i l l be erected fo r the Supreme Court on Caoitol H ill; and, as rapidly as possible, other buildings w ill be started to house the Departments of Justice and Labor, to provide a suitable bu ilding fo r the Government's archives, and buildings fo r - 7 - tlie In tersta te Commerce Commission and other independent establishments o f the Government. Most o f these buildings, with the exception o f those fo r the Supreme Court and the Department o f Agriculture,- w i l l be grouped to gether in the area known as the Pennsylvania Avenue Triangle, extending from 6 th Street to the Treasury at 1 5 th thereon to B S treet, bordering the Mall. S treet, -and .extending aoutl Tq secure a comprehensive treatment o f this area as regards the grouping and also the design o f the various bu ildin gsi .Secretary Mellon has appointed a Board o f Architectu ral Consultants composed o f fiv e p riv a te arch itects and one from the Supervising A rc h ite c t’ s O ffic e . This Board includes the distinguished president o f your Dew York chapter. The buildings o f the Triangle area, while being given in d iv id u a lity in th eir arch itec tural treatment, are to be harmonious in design and w ill be in keeping with the tra d itio n o f the best of our older Government buildings in Washington. The composition o f the new group w i l l include two large open spaces, one rectangulap in shape and re fe rre d to as the Great ' Plaza, the other circu la r, resembling in extent the Place Vendome in Paris. Such an arrangement w i l l add much to the beauty and d ig n ity o f Washington, and p a rtic u la rly o f Pennsylvania Avenue. At the same time i t w ill contribute to the convenience o f the Government and of those who must do business with i t without o b ligin g them, as at present, to tra vel from one end o f the c it y to the other in search o f the various bureaus o f a sin gle Department o f the Government. - 7i - By grouping these departmental buildings in the Pennsylvania Triangle, i t w ill be possible to carry out the o rig in a l conception o f Washington and L'Pnfant, that the Mall should be kept as a b ea u tifu l Park, interspersed occasionally with art g a lle r ie s and museums and adorned with drives and walks, r e fle c tin g pools and trees, a l l arranged in such a way that long vista s w ill be opened up fo r views o f the Capitol on it s commanding h i l l at one end, and o f the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial on the banks o f the Potomac at the other. I t is a magnificent conception. For it s design we are indebted to Washington^a.nd L ’Snfant; fo r it s preservation w© are under o b liga tion to Senator McMillan and the American In s titu te of A rch itects; and now fo r it s execution we owe a debt o f gratitu de to Secretary Mellon who has in sisted that the o rig in a l plan fo r the Mall be adhered to and that depart mental buildings must not be placed there, as was about to happen, but must be grouped along Pennsylvania Avenue in accordance with the o rig in a l design fo r the c it y . In carrying out these plans, Secretary Mellon and the Treasury have had the b en efit not only o f your advice as an organization but also of many individual members who are consulted from time to time. In th is, at le a s t, we are revertin g to the practice o f an e a r lie r and b e tte r day, and are fo llow in g the example o f Washington, who, as you know, consulted L'Unfant and Thornton and Hoban fo r the Capitol and the White House and took pains to see that the ideas of these expert advisers were carried out. I t is in terestin g to know that the great men who founded the Republic attached so much importance to beauty in public bu ildings. I have already re ferred to Washington and the concern which he f e l t as regards the smallest d e ta ils of the designs fo r the c a p ita l c it y and it s p rin cip al buildings* But le s t I be accused of partisanship in the a rts , e,s I so often am in p o lit ic s , l e t me quote fo r my Democratic brethren what Thomas Jefferson had to soy of the n ecessity fo r investing our public buildings with beauty and d ig n ity . Being in Paris in 1785, he was asked by the State of V irg in ia to secure a plan fo r a State House, which he did with great promptness, only to be informed that an impatient le g is la tu re had not waited fo r his design out had begun the erection o f a bu ilding less suited ifor it s purposes and fa r more expensive* In w ritin g to his frien d , Janes Madison, to enter his protest, Jefferson said: "How is a taste in this b eau tifu l art to be formed in our countrymen unless we a v a il ourselves of every occasion when build ings are to be erected of presenting to them models fo r th e ir study and im itation . . . . You see I am an enthusiast on the subject of the a rts, but i t is an entnusiasn of which I am not ashamed, as it s object is to improve the taste of my countrymen, to increase th e ir reputation, to recon cile to them the respect of the world and procure them it s p ra is 9 « ,, There is Jeffersonian sim p lic ity fo r you. of true greatness and true a r t. . But i t is the sim p licity May I add that, while at the Treasury we do not profess to fo llo w Jefferson in everything, at lea st in this respect we are tryin g to walk in his fo otstep s. In the plans which are being made fo r public buildings in Washington and throughout the country, Secretary Mellon has in sisted that in so fa r as i t may be possible, subject to the lim itation s of cost and le g a l re s tric tio n s in selectin g arch itectu ra l assis tance, we sh all give the country buildings in good taste and of the best design and arrangement that can be achieved under the circumstances* c? And now lo s t the too practically-m inded among you should he misled into thinking that the Treasury has fo r one moment lo s t sight of the p ra c tic a l in i t s championship of the esth etic side of any question, le t me hasten to say that we have found that "beauty of design has a concrete value that is beginning to he recognized even by a nation so eminently p ra c tic a l as our own. In fa c t, i t is a had investment to build anything t-iat is not b eau tifu l, or at lea st in good ta s te . Otherwise, in time, as taste improves, one can be sure that the ugly thing w ill be torn down to make-way fo r something b e tte r. C ertainly no one so w e ll as the Government i t s e l f can set a standard of good taste in architectu re and firm ly establish ings must of n ecessity add to w-iich they are erected. it. Our public build or detract from the beauty o f any c it y in Furthermore, i t is in evita b le that they should influence to some extent the architecture of buildings erected by the c it y or by p rivate enterprise* I t is of the greatest importance, therefore, that these buildings which, the Federal Government is erectin g should be simple and d ig n ifie d in design and suited to the uses to which they are to be put. But when i t comes to the building of a national ca p ita l, an even greater o b liga tion is imposed upon us. We have in herited from the founders of the Republic a great tra d itio n below which we dare not f a l l . And as the country has grown in greatness and in influence, it s ca p ita l c it y has become increasing ly important. More and more i t is being v is it e d by those who come from every part of this country tj^d the world*. We owe i t to them and to the generations yet to come, to ^see that they sh all fin d there a great and beau tifu l c it y — a c it y not made with hands only but into which have been builded the beauty and hopes and aspirations of America# FOR RELEASE UFON AFFEARANCE OF THE UNDERSECRETARY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE OH WAYS AND MEANS, WHICH WILL BE ABOUT 3 JAM., Wednesday, Febru-.ry 27» 1929* STATEMENT BY UNDERSECRETARY.OF THE TREASURY MILLS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, Wednesday, February 27, 1929Taken as a whole, the adm inistrative sections o f the T a r iff Act of 1922 have presented r e la t iv e ly few d i f f ic u lt i e s in in terp reta tio n .and enforcement. I t is in e v ita b le , however, in the administration o f a law o f such broad application as the T a r i f f Act fo r a period o f several years, that some d i f f ic u lt i e s should develop and in addition that some amendments s u r e s t themselves due to changing conditions. As a resu lt o f experience with the T a r if f Act o f 1922 and it s study of the adm inistrative provisions, the Treasury' Department b elieves that a considerable number o f amendments to the adm inistrative provisions could w ell be made at this time. For the most part, the amendments which the Department would recommend are of minor importance and involve l i t t l e the way o f p o lic y Qv change in procedure. in To aid the Committee in it s consideration o f amendments suggested, those considered to be o f major importance have been segregated from those which may w ell be considered as noncontroversial. Value As many of the t a r i f f rates are based on value, the d e fin itio n o f value is o f fundamental importance. U02 become major considerations. Therefore, any amendments to Section Accuracy in the determination o f value is essen tial to the p rotection o f the revenue-. I t is also important that value be defined so that i t may be re a d ily ascertained. Otherwise, an u n ju s tifie d burden would be p3mced on commerce and upon the administration o f the law. 2 • The accurate determination o f fo reig n value requires in vestigation s abroad and such in vestigation s cannot in a ll instances be conducted without opposition and objection d i f f ic u lt to overcome. The abandonment of fo re ig n value as a basis o f assessment of ad valorem duties is now the subject o f considerable discussion. This, however, is considered by the Department as a broad question o f p o lic y fo r the Congress to determine. In the absence of information as to the desire or intention o f the Committee to adopt some other basis o f value, the Department is confining it s suggested amendments to the improvement o f the present basis rather than the substitution o f some a lte rn a tiv e . Section 500 o f the T a r iff Act imposes on the appraiser the duty o f appraising the merchandise "in the unit o f quantity in which the merchandise is usually bought and sold by ascertaining or estim ating the value thereof by a l l reasonable ways and means in his power, any statement o f cost or cost o f production in any in voice, a ffid a v it , declaration, or other document to the contrary notwithstanding." The mandate o f Congress that the appraising o ffic e r sh all a ffirm a tiv e ly determine a value and not re ly on u n verified statements or statements not susceptible o f v e r ific a t io n is p lain . Section U02 o f the T a r iff Act provides in part that, " i f neither fo reig n nor export value can be ascertained to the sa tis fa c tio n of the Appraising O ffic e r ", duties shall be assessed on United States value. Under the present procedure with regard to reappraisement, although the Appraiser might not ascertain foreign value to his s a tis fa c tio n , the court, on appeal, might decide that a fo re ig n value did e x is t with the resu lt that the duties fin a lly determined and paid would be based on a fo reign value proved to the court by the submission o f a ffid a v it s which Treasury agents were unable to v e r ify , or by évidence undisclosed r? - 3 at the tin e the Appraiser made his decision and which cannot be subject to check. The weakness o f the present system, i t therefore ar pears, is not in Section ^02 which d irects appraisement on United States value where fo reign value cannot be s a t is fa c t o r ily ascertained, but in the reappraisement proceedings w.iich nay resu lt in appraisement on a value which cannot be properly v e r ifie d by Treasury o f f i c i a l s . I t is b elieved that the method or oasis determined upon by the Arp ra isin g O ffic e r as proper should, subject to review by the Secretary o f the Treasury, be applicable throughout a l l the proceedings. • Thus the Court would be lim ited to the question whether the value on the basis used by the Appraiser had been properly determined, and, i f not, to a redetem in ation o f the value on that basis only. The Department b elieves that the existin g law is susceptible o f being so construed and that the resu lt to be accomplished by the proposed amendment was intended in the 1922 Act. As a further safeguard i t is suggested that the appraiser’ s valuation be made prina fa c ie correct on reappraisement. The present d e fin itio n o f United States value is not e n tire ly S atisfactory, as sucn value cannot be found i f ’’ such or sim ilar inroorted merchandise” is not ’’ fr e e ly o ffe re d fo r sale in the p rin cip a l market o f the United States. ” The word ’’ sim ila r” has been very s t r ic t ly construed. I t is thought that the d e fin itio n should be amended to allow the value to be arrived at from the value o f a comparable a r t ic le , whether domestic or imported, so o ffe re d fo r sale in the United States, with proper adjustment fo r d ifferen ces in q u ality and in other respects. The Department b elieves that this accords with the intention o f the present d e fin itio n , and would make possible the determination o f United States value in many cases in which i t cannot now be determined. The provisions o f Section placing an embargo upon the goods o f exporters who refuse to allow access to th e ir books fo r the purpose o f determining value, have been productive of much i l l fe e lin g * which has sometimes approached international importance. I t is the opinion o f the Treasury that, with the amendments above suggested, section 510 may be repealed. Bonds There are many provisions throughout tlx._lct re oui rin g or authorizing the taking o f bonds in certain cases to secure the payment o f duties, or compliance with adm inistrative requirements. g re a tly . These provisions vary The Act requires bonds in some cases in which experience has shown them to be unnecessary, and omits the requirement in others where i t has been found that a bond is necessary fo r the protection o f the revenue. The department recommends, in order to provide more e la s t ic it y in this respect, that in lie u o f these s p e c ific requirements the Secretary o f the Treasury be given general authority to require by regulation sucn bonds or otner secu rity as he may deem necessary to protect the revenues and assure compliance with the provisions o f the law. The 4ct already gives the Secretary (or, in some cases, the Commissioner or the C o lle c to r) power to f i x the amount, to approve the sureties, and, sometimes, to prescribe the conditions o f the bonds required. The adm inistrative o ffic e r s thus have f u l l power over bonds, except in determining in what cases .they shall be required. .. '| Marking The several t a r i f f acts p rio r to 1922 have required that a l l imported a r t ic le s should be marked to in dicate the country o f o rigin , when such marking could be done without in ju ry. No penalty was prescribed other ' ~ 5 than that the a r t ic le s imported not marked should not be d elivered u n til marked in conformity with the law. Under these provisions the Customs o ffic e r s and the Treasury Department determined the question o f what a r t ic le s were subject to marking under the Act. The Act o f 1922, however, introduced two new elements: o f additional duty o f 10$ A penalty was imposed upon a l l a r t ic le s not marked at the time o f importation unless they were exported, and the domestic manufacturers were given the rig h t to protest against the rate o f duty assessed by the C o llecto r. In certa in instances the Department held the unit o f sale to be the a r t ic le rather than the individual piece in such unit, as, fo r example, a bundle o f shingles was held to be the a r t ic le o f commerce rather than the individual shingle, or the book o f c ig a re tte papers rather than the individual le a f. The Customs Court, however, has in terpreted the Act very s t r ic t ly , in dicating that the individual paper o f the c ig a re tte book or the individual shingle should be marked instead o f the book or the bundle. A s t r ic t in terp retatio n of the language o f the marking provision has led to absurdities, not only in requiring the marking of a r t ic le s where marking seems i l l o g i c a l , but in re lie v in g certain a rtic le s from the marking requirements where marking appears e n tir e ly reasonable. I t is b elieved that i f the p o lic y which requires the marking o f country o f o rig in is to be carried out adequately, greater f l e x i b i l i t y must be given to the statutory rule and power placed in the Secretary o f the Treasury to meet changing condition? and circumstance s. The amendment recommended to Section ¿Ok w i l l in no.wise a ffe c t the marking o f a r tic le s where Congress has seen f i t to prescribe a special form o f marking. Amendments to Entry Though the appraised value be lower than the entered value, duty cannot, under the law, be assessed on an amount less than the entered value (except in certain very lim ited classes o f cases). On the other hand, i f the appraised value be higher than the entered value, the importer is subject to substantial additional d u tie s I t is , therefore, g r e a tly to the im porter's in te rest to enter at a value which w i l l correspond as c lo s e ly as possible to the appraised value. The e x is tin g law allows an entry to be amended at any time before the invoice or the merchandise comes under the observation o f the appraiser. This has been construed by the court to mean the appraiser him self and not an assistant appraiser or examiner, although the la t t e r o ffic e r s value the merchandise, subject to the appraiser's approval. To carry out the evident intent o f Congress, i t is recommended that no amendment o f an entry be allowed a fte r the merchandise or in voice has come under the observation o f an examiner, assistant appraiser, or any other o f f i c e r fo r the purpose' o f ascertaining value. Drawback Section 313 o f the Act provides fo r the drawback of duties previou sly paid on imported merchandise upon the exportation o f a r tic le s manufactured or produced in the United States with the use o f such imported merchandise. Section provides that no drawback o f duty sh all be allowed ¿n the exportation o f any merchandise a fte r it s release from customs custody, except in the case o f a r t ic le s manufactured or produced, with the use of imported merchandise. J - 7 The word ’’ produced” in Section 313 has been broadly construed so that imported a r tic le s which have been subjected to some simple process, such ns dyeing, blenching, waterproofing, e tc ., have, on exportation, been e n title d to drawba.ck. Humorous cases have come to the atten tion of the Department in which individuals Irv c purchased im ported a r t ic le s which had been in this country fo r a considerable period and fo r which no market had been found, .and had subjected them to some such simple process and then exported them,obtaining drawback of duties in amounts exceeding the price maid fo r the a r t ic le s . There is another d i f f ic u lt y with the operation o f the two sections. .in importer may order a large shipment of goods from- -a fo reig n country. Upon the ordinary entry, he is not allowed to inspect then u n til they leave customs custody. He may then fin d they are not up to sample or s p e c ific a tio n s , but as they have been released from customs custody and do not f a l l within the drawback provisions, the duty paid cannot be refunded, even though the goods are so fa r from sp ecifica tion s as to make them useless to the importer. The American importer is thus to some extent a j th e,mercy of fo reig n exporters. Moreover, he is at once placed under the necessity of applying to the merchandise some one of the minor processes, above re fe rred to, so that he may obtain the b en efit of the drawback provisions of the Act. In order to remedy these two principe.l e v ils growing out of the drawback p ro visions, the Department recommends t t r t Section 313 be emended, fir s t, so as to allow drawback only in case the nanufe.cture or production to which the imported merchandise has been subjected in the United Ste.tes nas enhanced it s value and, second, to provide that drawbe.ck should not in any ca.se oe allowed in respect o f merchandise not exported within f i v e years from the date o f importation. These amendments would, i t is believed, - 8 - provide a very e ffe c t iv e check upon the business o f c o lle c tin g drawback L on merchandise fo r p r o fit . I t is fu rther recommended that Section 558 be broadened so as to a l low a refund in the case of goods found not up to sample or s p e c ific a tio n and exported within ten days a ft e r release from customs custody, questions o f id e n tify and conformity to s p e c ific a tio n to be determined under regu la tio n s prescribed by the Secretary. Such amendment, i t is b elieved , w ill a ffo rd r e l i e f to the importer who finds that he has not received what he ordered, and w i l l correct the present tendency of the law to d rive him to resort to questionable p ra ctices. B ills of Lading Section 483 of the Act provides that " A ll merchandise imported into the United States sh a ll, fo r the purposes of this t i t l e , be held to be the property of the person to whom the same is consigned; and the holder of a b i l l of lading duly indorsed by the consignee therein named, or, i f consigned to order, by the consignor, shall be deemed the consignee th e re o f". Section 484 (c ) provides that RThe consignee shall produce the b i l l of lading at the time of making en try". The Federal and State courts have held in several cases that under these provisions c o lle c to rs of customs are personally lia b le fo r any damage resu ltin g from the d e liv e ry or release of merchandise without the production by the party making entry of the o rig in a l b i l l of lading. For th eir own protection, therefore, most c o lle c to rs require the o rig in a l b i l l of lading to be f i l e d with the entry and retained in th eir custody. Importers and ca rriers object, and probably with reason, to this requirement. The importers contend that the o rig in a l b i l l of lading is needed to obta.in‘ possession of the goods s from tne c a rrie r, and the ca rriers contend that they must have the o r ig i ne,! h i l l ox lading fo r th eir own protection in the event a claim is f i l e d against them fo r wrongful d e liv e ry . Provision fo r protection of the c o lle c to r nacenting entry u'oon a duplicate h i l l of lading involves the d i f f ic u lt y of protectin g the shipper's rig h ts . The o rig in a l h i l l may have gone to a hank, with a d raft attached, against payment of which the h i l l is hold. Thus, to a-llow d e liv e ry by the c o lle c to r upon a duplicate h i l l would he to jeopardize the shipper’ s c o lle c tio n . The Treasury recommends as a solution of these d i f f ic u lt i e s that en tiy oe o.llowed upon eith er the o rig in a l h i l l or a, prooerlv c e r t ifie d duplicate, with a requirement that where entry is made upon a, duplicato, .and tne c o lle c to r has possession of the goods, he must eith er d e liv e r to the ca rrie r or to the holder of the o rig in a l h i l l . Where the c a rrie r obtains possession of tho goods, i t is of course responsible fo r d eliv ery , end the customs treatment does not a ffe c t tho situ ation in any respect. The amendments h eretofore discussed, i t is believed, are the only proposals which the Treasury desires to present which involve f a i r l y important questions of p o lic y . The ra,ther large number of other amend ments are of a minor, technical, or c le r ic a l naturo. I t is suggested that d rafts of these amendments he submitted to the Committee at a la te r date. I t is unnecessary to a„dd. that the Treasury w ill he very rla d of every opportunity to a,ssist the Committee in it s preparation of the proposed le g is la tio n . TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS,. Thursday, March 7, 1939* g— r~t, I f L# O L» 8 I » jp* u || "’jT &/ K STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te rest, through the Federal Reserve Banks, an issue o f nine months 4-f per cent Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TD2-1929, dated and bearing in te rest from March 15, 1929, and maturing December 15, 1929. The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $475,000,000, or thereabouts. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a te s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness of Series TM-1929'and TM2-1929, both maturing March 15, 1929. Subscriptions fo r which payment is to be tendered in c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness maturing March 15, 1929, w ill be a llo tte d in f u l l up to the amount o f the o ffe r in g . Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in terest coupons attached payable September 15 and December 15, 1929. About $560,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness, and about $60,000,000 in in te rest payments on the public debt, become due and payable on March 15, 1929. The present o ffe r in g , with tax and other receip ts, is expected to cover the Treasury’ s cash requirements u n til June. The text o f the o f f i c i a l circu la r follow s: - 2- The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the authority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended* o ffe r s fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TD2-1929, dated and bearing in terest from March 15, 1929, payable December 15j 1929, w ith in terest at the rate o f four and three-quarters per cent per annum, payable on a semiannual basis. Applications w i l l be received a t the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in terest coupons attached, payable September 15, 1929, and December 15, 1929. The c e r t ific a te s o f said series sh all be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te rest, from a l l taxation now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, or by any lo ca l taxing authority, except (a) estate or inheri tance taxes, and (b) graduated additional income taxes, commonly known as surtaxes, and excess-p rofits and w ar-profits taxes, now or h ereafter imposed by the United States, upon the income or p r o fits o f individuals, partnerships, associations, or corporations. The in terest on an amount o f bonds and c e r t ific a te s authorized by said Act approved September 24, 1917, and amendments thereto, the p rin cip a l of which d«es not ex ceed in the aggregate $5,000, owned by any in dividu al, partnership, association, or corporation, sh all be exempt from the taxes provided fo r in clause (b) above. -3 - The c e r t ific a te s o f this series w i l l he accepted a t par during such time and under such rules and regulations as sh all he pre scribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity o f the c e r t ific a t e s . The c e r t ific a te s o f this series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w i l l not bear the c irc u la tio n p r iv ile g e . The rig h t is reserved to re je c t any subscription and to a llo t less than the amount o f c e r t ific a te s applied fo r and to close the sub scription s at any time without notice. The Secretary of the Treasury also reserves the righ t to make allotment in f u l l upon applications fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotments upon, or to re je c t, applications fo r la rger amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotments and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w ill be fin a l. Allotment notices w i l l be sent out promptly upon allotment, and the basis of the allotm ent w i l l be p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in terest fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo tte d must be made on or before March 15, 1929, or on la te r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue interim receipts pending d eliv ery o f the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a te s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l be permitted to make payment by cred it fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo t t e d to i t fo r i t s e l f and it s customers up to any amount fo r which i t sh all be q u a lifie d in excess o f ex istin g deposits, when so n o tifie d by the Federal Reserve Bank o f it s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1929 and TM2-1929, both maturing March 15, 1929, w ill be accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a te s o f the -4~ series now o ffe re d which sh all he subscribed fo r and a llo t t e d , with an adjustment o f the in terest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r. As fis c a l agents o f the United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make Allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary o f the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is tr ic ts . TEEASUET BEP-OTMEET POE RELEASE, MOMip&jEiVPEESj Tuesday,' March IS , 1929. ? Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of 4—3/4 per cent Treasury C e rtific a te s o f Indebtedness, Series TD2*-1929, dated March 15, 1929, maturing December 15, 1929, w i l l close at the close o f business today, Tuesday, March 12, 1929. Subscriptions which f a i l to reach a Federal Reserve Bank or branch, or the Treasury Department, before the close o f business today w ill not be accepted* The p ractice o f accepting mail, sub«* scription s received on the morning fo llow in g the closin g o f 'th© books w ill not be observed with regard to the current off^M n gt TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Wednesday, March 13, 1929. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness, Series TD2-1929* 4^- per cent, dated March 15, 1929, maturing December 15, 1929, closed at the close o f business' on March 12, 1929. Reports received from the twelve Eederal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g , which was fo r $475,000,000, or thereabouts, to ta l sub scriptions aggregate some $523,000,000. As previously announced, sub scription s in payment of which Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness of Series TM-1929 and Series TMS-i929, maturing March 15, 1929, Were tendered, were a llo tte d in f u l l . Upon these exchange subscriptions about $33,000,000 have been a llo tte d . Allotments on the cash sub scription s were made as fo llo w s : A ll subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $100,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d in f u l l . Sub scriptions in amounts over $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d 90 per cent, but not less than $1 0 0 ,0 0 0 fc? any one subscriber; .and subscriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d 85 per cent, but not less than $900,000 fo r any one subscriber. Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments by Federal Reserve D is tric ts w ill be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve B-^nks, POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Thursday, March 14, 1929. TREASURY DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon today announced that the to ta l amount o f subscriptions received fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness, Series-TD21929, 4§ per cent, dated March 15, 1929, maturing December 15, 1929, was $524,109,000. The to ta l amount o f subscriptions a llo tte d was $475,999,500, o f which $32,796,500 represents allotments on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness of Series TM-1929 and TM2-1929, matur ing March 15, 1929, were tendered in payment. A ll of such exchange sub— scription s were a llo t t e d in f u l l , while allotm ents on other subscriptions were made on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotm ents were divided among the several Pederal Reserve D is tric ts and the Treasury as fo llo w s: Pederal Reserve D is t r ic t : Total Subscription s Received: Total Subscription s A llo tte d : Boston New York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Prancisco Treasury $ 24,715,000 202,996,000 31,613,500 33,366,500 30,022,000 27,544,000 63,670,500 16,121,500 8,889,000 17,499,500 30,009,000 37,289,000 373.500 $ 24,130,000 177,734,500 28,656,000 31,122,000 27,952,000 26,136,000 58,271,500 15,279^000 8,494,000 16,892,000 28,222,000 32,737,000 373,500 $524,109,000 $475,999,500 Total TREASURE DEPARTMENT fQ f IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, March 14, 1929. The Secretary o f the Treasury issued the fo llo w in g statement today: The president has today signed an Executive Order, and has approved Regula tio n s prescribed by me, re la tin g to the pu blication o f refund decisions o f the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue. B r ie fly , the e ffe c t o f the Order and the Regu la tio n s is that the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue w ill prepare a decision in every case in which an overassessment (whether resu ltin g in a refund, c r e d it, or abatement) o f income, w a r-p ro fits, ex cess-p ro fits, estate, or g i f t taxes, in excess o f $20,000, is allowed. This decision w ill be accor.panied by a b r ie f summary o f the relevant fa c ts and a c ita tio n o f the applicable statutory and ju d ic ia l a u th o rities, and w i l l be open to inspection in the o ffic e o f the Commissioner» I t has been the consistent p o lic y o f the. Treasury, a p o lic y determined upon only a ft e r carefu l consideration and as to which ample opportunities have been o ffe re d repeatedly fo r reconsideration, that tax returns, and the information thereon, should under no circumstances be open to public in spection. This p o lic y is based upon the p rin c ip le that taxpayers should be permitted to contribute th e ir share o f the revenue n ecess itie s o f the Govern ment without subjecting th e ir business a ffa ir s and transactions to the scrutiny o f th e ir competitors, the idl^T, curious, s o lic it o r s o f contributions, and unscrupulous tax p ra c titio n e rs seeking out possible, future c lie n ts » p o lic y is not a ffe c te d by the Executive Order. This The Regulations s p e c ific a lly provide that n either the return, nor any part th ereof, shall be open to in spection, and in addition the pu blication o f the source o f any income, gains, or p r o fit s , or transactions resu ltin g in losses or expenditures, is specif ic a lly proh ibited» The Congress adopted, as an amendment to the F ir s t D eficiency Appro p ria tio n Act, a provision which, as a matter o f le g a l in terp retation , would probably require no m aterial change in the procedure or p ra c tic e o f the Bureau 7 '■■w — o f Internal lie venue. 2 — Furthernore, whatever e ffe c t night have "been intended was, o f course, lim ite d to the s p e c ific appropriations made by that Act, and would not he applicable to any o f the other appropriations available fo r making refunds© The Treasury has entered serious objections to a l l so -ca lled ’’p u b lic ity 1* proposals. The soundness of th is p o sitio n is re ite ra te d . How ever, in an e ffo r t to dispel any misunderstanding that might have arisen in the minds o f the public because of the recent discussions of the matter, the Treasury has undertaken to go much fu rth er than the amendment requires* It is b elieved that the pu blication o f the decisions in the manner outlined above w i l l , in a very short period o f time, show conclusively that the Treasury has nothing to hide in the matter o f tax refunds; that there is nothing mysterious about tax refunds; that p r a c tic a lly a l l refunds, cred its, and abatements, which are allowed, are attrib u tab le d ir e c tly to such causes as decisions o f the courts or o f the Hoard o f Tax Appeals, overturning the Treasury p o sitio n or holding a provision of the statute unconstitutional, to re tro a c tiv e le g is la tio n , to u n certain ties, ambiguities or omissions in the statute, to mathematical erro r, to fa cto rs which could not have been determined at the time the tax was paid, or to the p u b lic -s p irite d attitu de o f taxpayers in deciding doubtful questions against themselves at the time \ \ the tax is paid, re ly in g upon a proper adm inistrative p o lic y in reaching \ a fin a l determination o f the amount properly due; and that, the refunding o f overpayments o f taxes is merely a necessary part o f the &dnittistr©r* tion o f our tax laws t - in fa c t, an essen tial c o ro lla ry o f any tax system founded upon the ’’payment f i r s t ” p rin cip le so frequently discussed* It must not be fo rgotten that our fe d e ra l tax c o lle c tio n system is founded upon the doctrine that taxpayers may be compelled to pay the amount govern ment o f f i c i a l s determine to be due, with no opportunity u n til a ft e r payment fo r a review of that determination* I t is v i t a l , and the in te re s ts o f tax— 7 ~ 3 ~ payers and the public gen erally properly demand as a necessary protection, that when that review is afforded, whether i t he adm inistrative or ju d ic ia l, the decision be ca rried out without undue delay* The Executive Order and the Regulations are as fo llo w s: EXECUTIVE ORDER pu blication o f In tern al Revenue Tax Refund Decisions Pursuant to the provisions o f section 55 o f the Revenue Act o f 1928 and section 257 o f the Revenue «Act of 1926, i t is hereby ordered that decisions o f the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue allow ing a refund, c re d it, or abatement o f income, w a r-p rofits, ex cess-p ro fits, esta te, or g i f t taxes, in excess o f $2 0 , 0 0 0 , shall be open to inspection in accord ance, and upon compliance, with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary o f the Treasury and approved by me, bearing even date herewith* HERBERT HOOVER The White House March 14, 1929. ( I . D. _________ ) Amending T. D* 3856 - Pu blication o f In tern al Revenue Tax Refund Decisions TREASURY DEPARTMENT, Washington, D. C. TO COLLECTORS OP INTERNAL REVENUE AND OTHERS CONCERNED: T*D* 3856, as amended, (being regulations prescribed by the Secretary and approved by the president and applicable to the inspection o f returns under the Revenue Act o f 1928 and p r io r Revenue A cts) is amended by adding «M ^ «M at the end thereof the fo llo w in g new paragraph: n20* The Commissioner o f Internal Revenue sh a ll cause to "be prepared a w ritten decision in every case in which an overassessment (whether resu ltin g in a refund, c r e d it, or abatement) o f an income, w a r-p rofits, ex cess-p ro fits, esta te, or g i f t tax is allowed, in excess o f $20,000, and such decision sh&ll he considered a public record and shall be open to inspection, during regular hours o f business, in the o f f ic e o f the Commissioner o f In tern al Revenue or such o ffic e as he may designate* Such decision shall givo the amount o f the overassessment and shall be accompanied by a b r ie f summary o f the relevant fa c ts and a c ita tio n o f the a u th o rities applicable thereto, or, in a case in which a decision o f a court or o f the Board o f Tax Appeals by a c ita tio n o f the court oaf Board decision* has become fin a l, Under no circumstances shall the provisions o f th is paragraph be construed as making any return, or any part thereof, open to inspection, or as authorizing the source o f ary income, gains, or p r o fit s , or the s p e c ific transactions resu ltin g in lo s s e s 'o r ex penditures, to be made p u b lic; nor shall any o f the information contained in any return or re la tin g thereto bo made public except in accordance with, and to the extent necessary in carrying out, these regu lation s*11 A. W* MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury* Approved: March 14, 1929* HERBERT HOOVER The Rhite House* Treasury Department For release, morning papers March 31, 1929, or when d elivered . TREASURY POLICIES Speech of Honorable A* W. Mellon Secretary of the Treasury from Station W IS. A L, Washington, as part of the National Radio Forum arranged by the Washington Star and sponsored by the Columbia Broadcasting System. March 30, 1929 Treasury P o lic ie s In this country tra d itio n plays -an important part in government. In the conduct o f business, on the other hand, we are singularly fre e as a people from being hamnered by precedent. I f a bridge must be b u ilt or a new process developed or an industry established, we fin d the best and quickest way to do i t and are not concerned because i t was never done that way before. I t is th is in it ia t iv e in blazing new t r a ils , this enterprise in overcoming d i f f ic u lt i e s , that have made America great. But in the conduct of government we have been slow, and r ig h tly so, in introducing innovations. We have changed somewhat and can s t i l l improve the structure o f government,al machinery, e s p ecia lly in the coordi nation of related or overlapping a c t iv it ie s . In so fa r, however, as fundamental p o lic ie s are concerned, they have been based, and are based today, on certain guiding p rin cip les which, with the passage o f time, have assumed the force of great tra d itio n s. This is p a rtic u la rly true as regards our fin a n cia l p o lic ie s . p o lic ie s are few in number and may be ea s ily enumerated. keeping of expenditures always within the revenues. payment o f the public Debt. These One is the Another is the A th ird is the levy of the lowest taxes consistent with the Government’ s needsj and s t i l l another is the support o f the Public Credit so that the fin a n cia l in te g r ity o f the Government • shall be a rock amidst the flu ctu ation s of internal and world finance. I t is of these p o lic ie s that I wish to speak. They are o f general in terest because the business of Government has become so vast in extent and is so far-reaching in it s influence that the manner in which i t i s conducted is of v it a l concern to every man, woman and ch ild in the country. - 2 - In so fa r as keening down expenditures is concerned, we have always "believed that they should "be kept within our revenues, and that the p ilin g up of debts, fo r current expenses, except in time o f war, is .stru ctly to "be avoided. But before the establishment of the Budget System eight years ago, there was no way of knowing what our expenditures would be. Each Department went to Congress and secured whatever i t could in the way of appropriations. Since the Budget S3*stem was established, however, Congress has recognized the importance of a balanced budget and has adhered strictly to the policy of keeping appropriations well within the Budget e stimates. Turning now to the question of debt payment; no other part o f our fin a n cia l p o lic y has been more consistently maintained than that providing fo r the prompt payment o f the public debt. Even in the ea rly days, a fte r the Revolutionary War, when a debt of 50 m illio n d o lla rs with an in te re s t charge of less than 5 m illio n d ollars a year constituted a problem o f the f i r s t magnitude, the newly formed government, with it s slender resources and inadequate fin a n cia l machinery, set about paying i t s debts. The same thing was true a fte r the C iv il War. A fte r the World War this p o lic y was continued and has been responsible fo r much of the progress made in paying o f f the debt. Today that debt has been reduced to manageable proportions and about three hundred m illio n d ollars a year saved in in terest charges. Eventually, as the debt is paid o ff e n tir e ly , th is drain on our revenues w ill be re moved and we can look forward then to a very great reduction in taxes. Already taxes have been restored to a peace-time le v e l. Over two m illio n individuals, in the lowest brackets, have been r e lie v e d o f a ll l i a b i l i t y fo r Federal income taxes, and the substitution o f moderate rates - 3 fo r excessive ores has ben efited a l l along the lin e . Productive business, by being re lieved of oppressive rates, has found i t possible to expand in an orderly manner. As a resu lt, prosperity has become more general; the national income has increased; and, during the year 1928 which set a new record fo r p ro sp erity, the Government received revenues adequate fo r it s needs, even with lower rates and fewer tax payers. This is progress in the righ t d irectio n . There is s t i l l much that can be done and should be done when revenues show s u ffic ie n t permanent increase. At present there is a growing demand fo r fu rther reductions in taxes on earned income. I t is a p o sition with which I have always been in sympathy, as - is evidenced by the recommendations which the. Treasury made to Congress as long ago as November, 1923. At that time the Treasury said: "The fairn ess of taxing more lig h t ly income from wages, salaries and professional services than the income from a business or from investment is beyond question. In the f i r s t case, the income is uncertain and lim ited in duration; sickness or death destroys i t and old age dimin ishes i t . In the other the source o f income continues; i t may be disposed of during a man* s l i f e and i t descends to h is h e ir s ." The Treasury is s t i l l of th is ouinion and w ill be glad to see these prin c ip le s s t i l l fu rther carried into law whenever revenues ju s t ify such action. Another place where progress can be made is in the administration of the tax laws. As a business man, I re a liz e how the average man and woman throughout the country view these laws. I know with what im patience you face the long and tedious business of making out your income tax return each year. The form which you must f i l l out doubtless seems unduly long and complicated; and i t is not unreasonable that you should ask, f i r s t , why the law can not be sim p lified , and secondly, why the return can not be reduced to a few short, simple questions and answers. t ♦ - 4 B elieve me when I say that the Treasury appreciates and sympathizes with that 'point of view. But there is an answer to each of these questions and the f i r s t one is that, i f the tax laws are to cover a ll the in tric a c ie s of modern "business, then these laws must, of necessity, "be technical in th e ir provision s. Suppose, fo r example, that fo r the present law we should substitute the simple statement that " a l l income shall he taxable" at given rates, without any attempt to define the word "income" and ignoring a ll such complicated and unpleasant matters as exemptions, cred its and deductions. 'That would happen? neither the Treasury nor the taxpayer would know, fo r example, whether business expenses were deductible or whether a p a rticu la r transaction gave ris e to taxable gain. The result would be that they would be obliged to go into the Courts to determine tax l i a b i l i t i e s . attained not by omitting True sim p licity can be v i t a l l y necessary statements and d e fin itio n s, but by making them as clea r and b r ie f as p ossible. If such statements are omitted in the name o f sim p licity, we may perhaps secure b revity, but -it w ill not be true sim p licity . How fo r the second question. An attempt is made each year to s in p lify the tax return; and i t might be possible to shorten i t s t i l l fu rther and to make i t seem le s s formidable i f i t were not necessary fo r one form to cover such a v a rie ty of cases. The real opportunity fo r improvement l i e s in sim plifyin g the administration of the tax laws; and th is the Treasury is making a determined e ff o r t to do. The Government is trying to s e ttle each tax case promptly and fin a lly and with due regard to the in terests of both the Government and the taxpayer. which has been made in this d irection is encouraging. i The progress ¡IJ I - 5 - I t was the general rule in “both State and Federal taxation that, i f a dispute arose over the amount to "be paid, the dispute was not allowed to postpone payments. This rule has been relaxed by the creation of the Board o f Tax Appeals, where the taxpayer can l i t i g a t e a l l claims fo r addition al taxes before payment is required in the ordinary case. I f , however, the taxpayer p refers to have recourse to the Federal Courts, then he must pay before bringing su it. But this does not mean that the G-overnment should keep money to which i t is not e n title d . I f the taxpayer is d is s a tis fie d with the amount he has paid, e ith e r upon his o rig in a l return or as determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, a. responsible and conscientious o f f i c i a l of the Treasury, who has the assistance o f expert technical and le g a l advice, then the taxpayer may claim a refund and eventually go to the Courts, i f necessary* I t is worthy o f note, however, in administering this d i f f ic u lt law, and p a rticu la rly the excess p r o fits taxes le v ie d during the war period, that so small a part of the taxes paid have had to be refunded. Since 1917 the Bureau o f Internal Revenue has co lle c te d almost 39 b illio n d olla rs and has assessed more than 4 b i llio n d o lla rs o f back taxes. During th is time i t has refunded le s s than one b illio n d ollars or approximately Per cent o f the amount c o llected , notwithstanding the large amounts re funded under in te rp reta tive Court decisions or because of re tro a ctive le g is la tio n or under provisions of the law which can be administered only through refunds. Even the cred its and abatements allowed since 1922 have amounted to less than 2 b illio n d o lla rs . hard to equal. I t is a record o f e ffic ie n c y that would be And yet responsible public o f f i c i a l s , while not charging dishonesty, have attempted to d iscred it th is record because occasionally a re fund o f several m illio n d ollars has been made to a single taxpayer. They neglect to state that the taxes paid by such individuals or corporations often run into the hundreds o f m illion s, of which only *a small part is ever refunded. - 6 - Honest c ritic is m , of course, is desirable and makes fo r e ffic ie n c y in government. But i t should be constructive c riticis m and not made in such a way as to increase the d i f f ic u lt i e s of administering a law as to which la rge re s p o n s ib ilitie s fo r administration must be vested in and assumed by the o f f i c i a l s charged with i t s enforcement. somewhere. R esp on sib ility must be placed I am convinced that the enforcement o f the tax laws must, of necessity, remain an adm inistrative problem, not a le g a lis t ic one, and that any p o lic y o f administration, which shuns such re sp o n sib ility by tran sferrin g the problem to the Courts fo r solution, endangers not only the law but the very existence o f the income tax. The Treasury has not and w ill not evade i t s r e s p o n s ib ilitie s in th is respect* I t is in furtherance of i t s p o licy never to endanger the in teg r it y o f the Income Tax that i t has maintained a consistent attitu de with re spect to the so-ca lled "tax p u b lic ity " question. The Treasury p o licy has always been that tax returns, and the information disclosed therein, should under no circumstances be open to public inspection. This p o lic y is based upon the p rin cip le that taxpayers should be permitted to contribute th e ir share of the revenue n ecessities of the Government without subjecting th e ir business a ffa ir s to the scrutiny of th eir competitors, the id ly curious, the s o lic it o r s of contributions, and unscrupulous p ra c titio n e rs seeking out possible future c lie n ts . This p o lic y is not a ffected by the Regulations recently issued by the Treasury providing fo r the publication of refund decisions. What w ill be published w ill be a b r ie f summary of the relevant fa c ts and a c ita tio n o f the statutory and applicable ju d ic ia l a u th o rities. I t is b elieved that the publication of such decisions w ill remove any possible grounds fo r misunder standing or fo r loose and unfounded charges that the decisions o f the Com missioner o f Internal Revenue are not made in accordance with law* yé Wow as regards the Public C redit: i t has been the aim of tho Govern ment to carry on it s own fin a n c ia l operations with the lea st possible dis turbance eith er to business or to the individuals of the country. in recent years, we have evolved the machinery to do th is . Portunatelyj And yet there was a tine not so very long ago, during the Spanish-American War, when, in àrder to flo a t a bond issue o f only 200 m illio n d o lla rs, the market had to be prepared and the operation carried through with the greatest care. Compare tne d i f f ic u lt y of that r e la t iv e ly small undertaking with the ease with which the Government's vast fin a n c ia l operations can be carried on today. Last year these operations involved more than 10 b illio n d o lla rs . Witnin a twelve month period the Government c o llected over c h ie fly from customs duties and income taxes. 4 b i l l i o n d o lla rs, £lt paid out a lik e amount; and, m addition to th is, made provision fo r the Third L ib erty Loan which came due in September and amounted, at the time refunding operations com menced, to over 2 b illio n d o lla rs . The Treasury was obliged to produce funds with which to pay o f f th is loan, or else exchange part of i t fo r other obligation s bearing lower rates of in terest and coming due at some convenient time in the fu tu re. I t would have been d i f f i c u l t to do th is, or even to carry on the Govern ment's usual quarterly financing, without some such machinery as that provided by the' fe d e ra l Reserve System. This may be seen by reviewing b r i e f l y now such quarterly financing Is done. The p rin cip al source o f Government funds is from tax payments, made on quarterly tax payment dates on the 15th o f March, June, September andTDecember and deposited to the c re d it o f the Government with the fed era l Reserve Banks. I f these payments were permitted to remain in the fe d e ra l Reserve Banks, outside the ordinary channels of trade u n til needed fo r Government expenditures, there would be a stringency in the money market every quarter u n til the money was distribu ted to the commercial banks o f the country. So what the Government does to avoid this situ ation , is to s e l l short term notes or c e r t ific a te s timed to mature on quarterly tax-payment dates; cud tile proceeds, generally speaking, are l e f t on deposit at in te rest with the subscribing banks to be withdrawn into the Federal Reserve Banks from time to time as needed during the succeeding quarter fo r the Government*s current expenditures. When the tax payments are received, they are used to pay o ff in whole or in part these c e r t ific a te s o f notes manuring on the same date; and, in this way, transactions often in volvin g h a lf a b illio n d o lla rs or more on each side, are cleared through the banks in the course of a few days without in volvin g the withdrawal of these vast sums from general circu la tio n even fo r a sin gle day. I f the tax payments and other receipts should exceed the amounts needed fo r expenditures fo r any three months’ period, this surplus can always be p ro fita b ly applied in reduction of the public debt. just described, By the use of the method which I have the Government is enabled to carry on it# tions with the lea st possible disturbance to the busifipfes fin a n c ia l opera l i f e of the country* Such, in b r ie f outline, are the Government’ s fin a n c ia l p o lic ie s . They s t i l l conform, as you see, to the tra d ition s established when the Government was f i r s t founded. We can not do b etter than to fo llo w those tra d ition s and to make sure that, in fundamental matters, our actions square with those great, immutable p rin cip les ’which bur fo refa th ers,w ith such consummate wisdom, made a part of the very structure of our Government. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Monday, A p ril 15, 1929. The Treasury has received so many inqu iries regarding the plans fo r the erection o f Government "buildings here and also fo r the development o f the Mall and other parts o f Washiigton, that i t has seemed desirable to report progress. In order to accomplish th is a meeting w ill be held on Thursday evening, A pril 25th, in the Council Chamber o f the United States Chamber of Commerce, which has been tendered fo r use on this occasion. I t w ill be in the nature of an o f f i c i a l meeting, to which in vita tio n s w ill be sent to the President, the Vice President, the Cabinet, the United States Supreme Court, the Senate and House o f Represen ta tiv e s , the pine Arts Commission and the national Capital Park and Planning Commission. The wife of each o f f i c i a l w ill also be in v ite d . Owing to the lim ited capacity of the h a ll, cards can be issued only to the above o f f i c i a l s . The only additional guests w ill be the members of the American In s titu te of Architects, then holding i t s annual meeting in Washington. The new model, which has ju st been completed, of the Government buildings to be erected in the Pennsylvania Avenue Triangle from F ifteenth Street to the Canitol, w ill be exhibited fo r the f i r s t time, and a motion picture film of nThe City o f Washington," which has been sp ecia lly made fo r the occasion, w ill be shown. Secretary Mellon w ill act as presiding o ffic e r . Speeches w ill be made on subjects re la tin g to the development o f Washington by President Hoover, Senator Smoot, Congressman Richard N. E l l i o t t , and Mr. Milton B. Medary o f Philadelphia, who is a member of the national Capital Park and Planning Commission. Hie en t ir e proceedings w ill be broadcast over a nation-wide radio chain, and during the evening the Marine Band Orchestra w ill play. TREASURY DEPARTIEITT FOR IMMEDIATE mEASE, MONDAY, APRIL 22,1929* In connection with the h i l l s to-day introduced "by Senator Smoot and Representative Hawley authorizing the Treasury Department to s e ll Treasury h i l l s on a discount basis, secretary Mellon made the fo llo w in g statement: The present method o f financing the requirements o f the United States Government was developed as a war measure, and not only served admirably in f i nancing war-time expenditures hut has continued to function s a t is fa c t o r ily up to the present time. The Treasury Department b elie ves, however, that in so fa r as short-term financing is concerned, certain m odifications are desirable in the in terest of greater econony and o f clo ser adjustment o f current borrowings to the immediate needs o f the Government* Generally speaking, short-term financing o f the Government is ca rried on by means o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s , with m aturities o f from three to twelve months, issued quarterly on tax-payment dates and maturing on tax-payment dates* c e r t ific a t e s serve a th re e -fo ld purpose: These They maintain a part of the outstanding war debt in the form of short-term s e c u ritie s , which, on the whole, has been ad vantageous from the standpointof in te rest charges* They provide the necessary funds to meet the current obligation s of the Government* Since th e ir maturities coincide with the period during which very heavy tax payments are received, they furnish an e ffe c t iv e instrument fo r preventing heavy withdrawal o f funds from the market, with a consequent serious disturbance every quarter date. I t is not the purpose o f the Treasury Department to dispense with this system, to which our people have become accustomed and which has functioned smoothly and e ff ic ie n t ly , but rather to correct certa in defects which have de veloped and to supplement i t in such a way as w ill decrease the cost of finaneing and adjust i t more clo s e ly to the needs o f the Government* The defects may be b r ie fly described as follow s* 1. Since the Government borrows only four times a year, the funds are borrowed in advance of the actual requirements, and the in terest cost on such borrowings has exceeded the in te rest received on id le Government deposits* Thus, fo r instance, the Government borrows on the 15th o f March the funds 2 necessary to meet certain d e fin ite obligation s on the 15th of A p ril and there is n ecessarily a thirty-day in te re s t lo ss on the funds borrowed. I f , however, the freasairy sold b i l l s on the 15th o f A pril rather than c e r t ific a te # on a de posit cred it basis on the 15th o f March, the saving would be immediate and sub stan tial • 2. While the maturing of secu rities today synchronizes in a general way with the c o lle c tio n of income taxes^ in practice the redemption o f these se cu ritie s proceeds more rapidly than income tax checks can be c o lle c te d . Con sequently at every tax period there is a temporary excess o f Treasury disburse ments, which necessitate# temporary c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness issued to cover over-d rafts at the Federal Reserve Banks, on which the Treasury Departnent pays in terest in addition to the in terest paid on the newly issued securi tie s . 3. Under the present system where c e r t ific a te s are issued bearing a fix e d coupon rate, the Treasury Department is confronted with the d i f f i c u l t task of accurately adjusting the in terest rate to current market conditions, and while the Department has been successful in doing this with great accuracy, never theless i t would be more desirable to have the market i t s e l f f i x the rate by competitive bidding. The Treasury Department, th erefore, suggests that the necessary le g is la tive authority be obtained to permit the Treasury to s e ll short-term b i l l s , with a maturity not grea ter than a year, on a discount basis, thus furnishing the Government with a new and more fle x ib le type of secu rity. Such Treasury b i l l s would be sold from time to time in the market whenever funds were needed fo r cash on a discount basis at the lowest rates bid by prospective purchasers. It is not the purpose o f the Treasury Department, however, to discontinue the present depositary method or system o f short-term financing, but rather to sup plement i t with the new system, using both as may prove to be most advantageous to the in terests o f the Government. Vt' ' s* - 3 Several important advantages may be expected to fo llo w the adoption of this new form of Treasury ob liga tion : 1* .Competitive bidding fo r these b i l l s should enable the Treasury to get the lowest discount rates consistent with current market conditions. 2. The sale of these secu rities could be timed to coincide almost exact ly with the need fo r funds, thus saving the in te rest on money borrowed ahead o f requirements. 3 . ‘ M aturities could be timed to correspond c lo s e ly to the actual c o lle c tion o f income taxes and not a l l made to f a l l on the nominal date of tax pay ments, as at present.'' . 4. • They would enable the Treasury to take advantage o f periods of seasonal ease fo r the sale of Treasury b i l l s rather than, as sometimes occurs, compel the Treasury to o ffe r a large issue o f secu rities during a p eriod o f temporary stringency and high money rates. 5 .. The banks and the in vestin g public would be furnished with a new in strument fo r the investing o f terrporary surplus funds, with frequent and convenient m aturities For release, afternoon papers, Wednesday, A p ril 24, 1929. Treasury Department Owing to in a b ility , on account of the size of the h a ll, to supply extra tick ets fo r the meeting to be held on Thursday, A p ril 25th, at the United States Chamber o f Commerce, and also because of the fa c t that some persons can not be present at that meeting, Secretary Mellon has arranged a second meeting to be held on the fo llo w in g evening, Friday, at the Chamber of Commerce Building at 8:30 o ’ clock. At this meeting Honorable Charles Moore, Chairman of the Fine Arts Commission, w i l l preside, and the speakers w ill be Hon. Louis C. Cramton and Hon. A. J# Montague o f the House of Representatives, Mr. Edward H*. Bennett, Chairman of the Board of A rch itectu ral Consultants, Treasury Department, and Major L, E. Atkins, of the D is tr ic t of Columbia Government. The Marine Band Orchestra w ill play, and fo llow in g the program of speeches the moving picture film of ” The City of Washington” w ill be shown. This film has been sp e cia lly made fo r the occasion under the d irectio n of the Treasury Department. I t is the story of the C ity of Washington from the time when i t was founded up to the present and i t also deals with the future developments that are now or soon w i l l be under way. I t is the f i r s t time that a complete story of the C ity has ever been to ld with moving p ictu res. The photography was done by Lawrence Kroger and in the making of the picture various Government departments had a p art. The Signal Corps laboratories of the War Depart ment assisted; the motion picture section of the Department of Agriculture furnished it s f a c i l i t i e s ; and the Wavy Department has also contributed help. I t is expected that the film w ill be shown in other places fo llo w in g it s f i r s t presentation here on Thursday and Friday evenings. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS THURSDAY, APRIL 25, 1929. SPEECH TO BE DELIVERED BY HON. OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, -b e fo re THE FORUM OF WASHINGTON CHAPTER, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF BANKING, AT THE RALEIGH HOTEL, WASHINGTON, ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 24, I 929. Note: For f u l l text of speech see Subject F ile : U.3. Sec.— Treasury B i l l s HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS A p ril 26, 1929, or when delivered* ADDRESS OP Honorable Richard N* E l l i o t t , Chairman, Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds o f the House o f Representatives At the meeting on the development o f Washington held at the United States Chamber of Commerce Building, Washington A p ril 25, 1929. * Washington, the ca p ita l of the United States, .is the only c it y in the country that is purely fed eral in i t s character. I t is governed by the p re s i dent and the Congress, the c itiz e n s having no voice in it s government. I t is what our fo refath ers intended i t to be, the home o f our fed eral government, and Congress should make i t a model c it y , the greatest can ital in the world* Congress meeting in Philadelphia in 1790 passed an act removing the capital from that c ity to the D is tric t o f Columbia, a tra ct o f land containing one hundred square miles o f te r r ito r y which was ceded to the fed eral government by the States o f Maryland and V irg in ia . I t was located at the head of tidewater on the Potomac River, as a compromise between the representatives o f the thirteen origin a l states. This was the f i r s t act o f Congress re la tin g to the capital in it s present lo ca tio n . The c it y was la id out by Major P ierre Charles L TEnfant, a French army engineer, in accordance with the act o f Congress and under the supervision and d irection o f President G-eorge Washington, The p la t o f the c ity could w ell be used by any great c i t 3-r planner o f today and r e fle c t s great cred it upon it s authors. It was planned to f a c i l i t a t e the movement o f troops through the c it y and it s broad avenues extend in every d irection , making a l l parts o f the c it y ea^r o f access from any given point. While in 1790 the greed o f man had not ye t been f e l t in the destruction of naturels great fo re s ts and natural parks, which G-od designed and created fo r the w elfare, pleasure and happiness of the people, the planners o f the capital rea lized that some day there would be great need in th is c it y fo r parks and breathing places fo r it s inhabitants. They provided the Mall and other parks which form the nucleus o f the beau tifu l park system in the national ca p ita l of Which we a l l are ju s tly proud. The f i r s t buildings authorized by Congress were the Canitol, White House and Land O ffic e . A fte r the p a rtia l destruction o f the Capitol and the White House by the B ritish Arny in 1814 these buildings were rebu ilt and the Capitol - 2 * TMs law was quickly follow ed "by the Triangle h i l l which authorized the purchase of a l l the laud "bounded "by Pennsylvania Avenue, Third S treet, îîisscu ri Avenue, B Street and Fifteenth S treet, N»W* The land is to "be cleared of "buildings and used fo r the s ite s fo r the magnificent public buildings shewn on the model exnibioed here tonight* They w ill be easy o f access to the people who have business to contract with the government, a matter that w ill be high ly aTonreciated by a ll who have experienced the d iff ic u lt y we have had to contend with, in the widely scattered bureaus ^nd departments as they are now located. For in stance the Department o f Agriculture has been occupying snace in fo r t 3r~seven d iffe re n t and widely scattered rented buildings in the D is tric t o f Columbia; the Bureau of Internal Revenue has occupied space in nineteen buildings; and a ll departments of the government have been likew ise congested. In addition to this the archives o f the government, many of them p ric e le s s , many o f them records on which our gloriou s h istory rests, containing the records of the World -Jar so ld iers, have o f necessity been kept in non fir c o r c c f buildings where they have been under grave danger o f destruction fo r many 3^ears. Some of the buildings authorized under the terms of the public building law o f 1926 are fo r the Departments cf Commerce, Agricu ltu re, Labor, Justice, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Archives Building, and additions to the G-rverrment P rin tin g O ffice and the Bureau o f Engraving and Prin tin g. The nassage of this act marked an epoch in the h istory o f the oublic buildings of our country fo r the reason that i t was the beginning o f the f i r s t comorehersive building program adopted by cur government. I t net only took into consideration the need fo r public buildings in the D is tr ic t o f Columbia but provided fo r much needed public buildings throughout continental United States and i t s dependencies. The sixty-ninth and seventieth Congresses w ill go down in h istory as doing more in a constructive way fo r the remaking o f the national ca p ita l and the providing of adequate public buildings throughout the country than a ll c f the preceding Congresses had done in th is behalf* inents, the le g is la t iv e , executive and ju d ic ia l. had a sa tisfa cto ry or adequate home. The Supreme court A fter the Senate wing of the ca p ito l was \ b u ilt ju st before the C iv il War the old Senate Chamber was turned over to this ^Nl h , great court fo r a court room and i t has held it s sessions in that chamber since that time. I t is without doubt the greatest court in the world. I t s de cision s are f e l t and respected by a ll our people, most o f whom w ill be surprised to know that the average county seat court in the United States is b e tte r housed than is the Supreme, Court. Under the terms of the public building act a new Supreme Court House w i l l be erected on the block o f ground north c f the Con- gressional Library which w ill be in keeping with i t s dign ity and importance. Another important act passed by Congress was the authorization o f the A rlington Memorial Bridge which was .the dream o f Andrew Jackson, President of the United States, who in sisted that there should be a bridge of enduring granite spanning the broad bosom o f the Potomac as a symbol o f the union o f the ilorth and the South. Within a short time that dream w ill be re a liz e d in the completion o f the great bridge now under construction; and i t is a coincidence that tne construction work o f this great bridge has been done under the super visio n of L ieu t. Col. U.S. Grant, 3d, a grandson o f the la te General U*S* Grant A magnificent boulevard has been authorized connecting the west end o f the Arlington Bridge with Mt. Vernon, the home o f Washington. B Street is to be widened to the width of one hundred and.twenty fe e t from the Senate O ffic e Buil ing to the Potomac R iver. Twenty-third Street, R.W. w ill be widened as fa r north as Washington C irc le . B Street between the government buildings and the Mall w ill he the great thoroughfare over which processions going from the Rational Capitol to A rlington Cemetery w ill tra v e l. Last but not lea st is the act o f March 4th, 1923, a b i l l fo r the enlarging of the ca o ito l grounds. i t authorizes the opening o f a boulevard from the Columbus Monument, in fron t of the Union Station, to a point where i t w ill in tersect with Pennsylvania Avenue at Second Street, and i t provides fo r the ex tension o f the Capitol Park to the Union Station and removes a l l o f the old buildings therefrom. I t is said that the signing o f th is b i l l was the la s t o f f i c i a l act of President Calvin Codlidge who was a great frien d o f a ll the le g is la tio n seeking to improve and rebuild the national c a p ita l. His adminis tration w ill go down in h istory as marking the beginning of the great recon stru ctive period in the national c a p ita l. The work o f constructing these great buildings is placed by law in the hands o f the Secretary o f the Treasury. Sec retary Mellon and h is able corps o f assistants have been working hard to carry on th is great work and complete i t at the e a rlie s t possible time, and they deand oxer?ij;. f o r . tha <=tfo-rt. t-^ev have mandate' o f Congress. mifr frha I t is w ell to note that in th is time o f reconstruction o f the national ca p ita l we are fortunate in having as ch ief executive o f the nation a man who is a trained engineer and bu ilder, one whose l i f e has been de voted to the handling o f large affairs. president Hoover by reason of his nstructive achievements to his great a b ilit y and industry w ill have many con cred it at thè\end of his administration, and he w i l l no doubt go down in h istory as the great bu ilder and the monument to h is administration w ill be Washington, the fin eb t cap ita l in the world* FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PARE APRIL 26, 1929, or when delivered* "Making a Capital City" Address of Milton B. Meda ry Member of the National Capital Park and Planning Ceram: ssion at a Meeting on the Development o f the City of Washington held at the United States Chamber o f Commerce Building Washington A p ril 25, 1929. The physical plan of a c ity should hear the same re la tio n to the development of it s separate elements that a constitu tion or charter hears to the development of the social and p o lit ic a l l i f e o f i t s people. Washington and his advisers recognized this fa c t and gave us a physical plan with our Constitution. Had they anticipated the chaos and anarchy associated with the physical development of many American c it ie s during the period which follow ed the early Republic, I am in clin ed to think they would have provided a Government agency as guardian of the physical plan o f Washington in much the same manner as the Su-oreme Court is called upon to measure the development o f social and p o lit ic a l in stitu tio n s in terms o f the Constitution. Such a plan must n ecessarily he basic and fle x ib le enough to permit the fre e s t development in accordance with the varying conditions o f a constantly changing social order, in sistin g only that a ll individual elements o f a c ity *s growth shall be in harmony with each other and with the whole. The value of large and farseein g planning is by no means confined to the aesth etic. In considering each p ro jec t in the development of a c it y as a part of a grand purpose, great economies resu lt from the avoidance of overlapping in terests and the consequent destruction o f previous development by the encroach ment o f newer work, and through the conveniences of use resu ltin g from orderly arrangement of related in te rests. Each step in such a program gradually but consistently leads in the d irection o f that true sim p licity in the arrangement of the c it y as a whole which can result only from a singleness o f purpose behind <=V a ll of it s physical works. Without such purpose physical chaos w ill eventually deprive a c it y o f much of it s usefulness as w ell as it s d ig n ity. The period o f a r t is t ic i l lit e r a c y which governed the development o f Washington during the neriod between the 2 influence o f the L rEnfant Plan and the Plan of 1901 w ell illu s tr a te s th is point, a notable example being the introduction o f ra ilroa d tracks and station s in the great park designed by L*Enfant and known as the M all. The cost and manner of correcting this mistake illu s t r a t e both the lack of economy resu ltin g from un guided development and the value to a c it y of the orderly d isp ositio n o f it s u t i l i t i e s in th e ir true re la tio n to a great basic plan. The great industries of the country never h esita te to scrap en tire plants, i f badly planned, not fo r aesthetic reasons but as a necessary measure of economy of production and main tenance, and our u n iv e rs itie s , h ospitals and other la rge in stitu tio n s are fr e quently under the same necessity. Huge as our country has become and accustomed as we are to large figu res, we are often staggered by large plans because of the ultimate cost o f th eir re a liza tio n . The size and cost o f the ultimate re a liz a tio n of the City of Washington as planned by Id Enfant did not seem extravagant to Washington and the group o f his advisers who dictated that plan. The infant Republic was in no position to think of i t s immediate re a liz a tio n , but nevertheless i t was planned to be the cap ita l o f what Washington believed would be a great nation and in discussing such d e ta ils o f the plan as the size of the White House he stated that the plans were being made fo r a fa r-d ista n t future. The McMillan plan, made in 1900, is a fte r nearly th irty years, only p a rtly rea lized . I t would seem reasonable, therefore, to an ticip ate a neriod of tw enty-five to f i f t y years in any comprehensive plans fo r the future and in doing so they should represent the normal annual development m u ltiplied by 25 or 50 without implying any increase in normal average expenditure. This much fa rsigh t at le a s t would be required to insure against the destruc tion in one decade of what had been b u ilt in an e a r lie r one while at the same time paving the way to ultimate resu lts not possible in individual p ro je c ts . The cost of public works is la rg e ly a state o f mind, and, while we are accustomed 3 7 to the costs of naval vessels and great reclamation works, we are not accustomed to compare the cost o f the Capitol on the h i l l , symbolizing the whole Nation, with the cost of single u nits in a naval program, or to the thought that a dozen navies have been b u ilt and scraoped while the Capiiol has been serving the Nation, and that i t stands today, as through i t s whole h istory, one o f the notable buildings of the world, Turning fo r a moment to the model of the departmental buildings as exhibited here tonight - the lin e of buildings fa cin g on B .Street and continued west beyond the Monument toward the r iv e r would cost much less than a lin e o f warships o f the same length and would o u tlive them by more than a century. Or, as another example, the cost of the two aeroplane ca rriers recen tly constructed would more than bu ild and equip a ll of the buildings in the T rian gle. A National Capital or a Federal C ity has stood as a challenge to the American people ever since provision was made fo r i t in the Constitution and since L ’ Enfant c ry s ta llize d in a d e fin ite form the visio n of Washington and his associates o f a c ity belonging to and ty p ify in g the whole Nation, independent of any o f the States, a plan so farseein g that the early structures, which were planned in harmony with i t s s p ir it , although surrounded fo r years with thoughtless develop ment, maintain th eir places as dominating elements in the o rigin a l plan or in any worthy plan conception of today, and a ffirm the judgment of L fEnfant in f it t in g the proposed c it y to the topography o f the s ite . An era of rapid development is the usual explanation of the lack o f visio n which characterized the development o f Washington a ft e r the period of the early Republic. The renewed in te rest in the National Capital which has follow ed the Plan of 1901 indicates however that rapid development o ffe r s no excuse but rather demands greater v isio n . The Plan of 1901 made i t clea r that what was envisioned and ph ysically begun by the Founders of the Nation was the only basis upon which it can consistently develop into a great and beau tifu l c a p ita l. - 4 Perhaps i t was because there was no complicated group of lo c a l c it y in terests to confuse the visio n of it s Pounders, and because in th e ir minds there mast have been a firm intention that such in terests when they came should always be secondary and kept in th eir true re la tio n to the national character o f the City, that the construction o f a l l the ea rly uublic works was begun with the plans of L lEnfant taken fo r granted and apparently without the suspicion that the would be forgotten and ignored. I t would seem wise fo r us to think of the Washington of the future as i t was thought of by i t s Pounders and in a l l public works or le g is la tio n a ffe c tin g the City to have in mind the d ig n it 3r and d is tinction o f it s ultim ate character as a national c it y distinguished from the great commercial c i t ie s which ju s tly and f i t t i n g l y express th e ir raison d’ etre, each in it s own way. There should be no c o n flic tin g national and lo c a l in terests; as the Capitol on the h i l l is the nation*s Canitol so the City must always be the nation*s C ity. I t was founded fo r this nurpose, and i t s con struction nobly begun and i t s future l e f t in fa ith and trust to the successors of the Pounders. Washington is the place where it seems to me more than anywhere else a ll the men who have loved this Country and planned great things for i t and had vision s o f it s greatness and power li v e today in the l i f e they have put into i t . The costs of building and maintaining a Nation’ s Capital have been the sub ject o f much controversy and i t is not my purpose to discuss the m erits o f the many suggestions which have been o ffered , but I b e lie v e the e ffe c t upon the character of the Capital o f the application o f certain p rin cip les demands care ful consideration. Washington should not only be the seat of the National Government, but should also in v ite as it s guests the national organizations having to do with the arts and sciences and the cu ltu ral and s p iritu a l elements of l i f e . i f the Capital is to become the cultural center o f the Nation, the ousing of such in terests requires the creation and maintenance o f streets and - 5 u t i l i t i e s , p o lic e and f i r e protection, and many other obligation s o f a c it y goverr. mentí, and i t would seem as i f a plan could reasonably be devised by which the national and lo c a l in te rests could be d e fin it e ly segregated perm itting the Capital to be b u ilt as generously as i t may wish o f the love of a whole Nation, without complication with the finances of the D is tr ic t, reaffirm in g the o rig in a l hope that Washington should never become a competitor o f the commercial and in du strial centers of the country. Frequent reference has been made to the L 1Enfant Plan, and so much has been said concerning i t that i t seems important to discuss those elements which make it applicable to the present time and not merely an in terestin g h is to r ic document. Its greatness l i e s in it s sim p licity and in i t s development to the utmost of the topography of the D is t r ic t . With the Canitol placed upon the h i l l a great park extends westward to the riv e r, thus giv in g the Capitol major importance fo r a ll time. The center of this park was planned as an open Mall dominated by the dome of the C apitol. From the center of the dome great a r t e r ia l avenues radiated in a ll direction s each o f which led up to and in turn was dominated by the dome, thus radiating the influence of the Capitol to a l l parts of the C ity, and in turn leading a ll parts o f the City up to the Capitol. The same arrangement focused upon the Presidentas Eou.se which also had it s own great park, though of le s s e r importance in the plan, leading southward to the M all. The in tersectio n o f the great diagonal avenues o ffe re d minor fo ca l points as ideal location s fo r memorials of the Nat ion 1 s h isto ry . Lying between these .-great thoroughfares a network of smaller streets o ffe re d access to individual properties not exposed to the con fusion o f the heavier t r a f f i c on the main a rte rie s . This is a co n tro llin g p rin cip le sought today in a ll modern planning aud zoning regulations. The f l e x i b i l i t y o f the L lEnfant Plan is best illu s tra te d by the fa c t that many developments of the present day, undreamed of in L ’ Enfant’ s time, fin d their "best expression "by conformity with the grea ter elements o f h is plan. As a sp ecific illu s tr a tio n , the Department of Commerce, now "building, houses one of the greatest a c t iv it ie s o f the Federal Government and is a structure o f such great size that i t would he a dominating element in any large c i t y . Every apartment within th is building has been designed to meet the requirements of the particu lar work which w ill be housed in i t . These apartments have been as sembled into a great building and take th e ir r e la tiv e places within i t . The building i t s e l f , however, becomes merely a unit in a greater p roject known as the Triangle Development. The name "Triangle" is merely an acknowledgment of the L !Snfant Plan and represents the triangu lar space ly in g between Pennsylvania Avenue, radiating from the C&pitol toward the northwest, and the boundaries o f the Mall, running d ir e c tly west from the Capitol grounds. This la rg e r unit in i t s e l f recognizes the greater plan and has been designed to create a monu mental and e ffe c t iv e separation of B Street and Pennsylvania Avenue at the apex of the Triangle and to make a f i t t i n g closure of the cross v is ta from the Mall to the Department o f Justice bu ildin g. I t gives a facade to Pennsylvania Avenue worthy o f the importance o f that thoroughfare, and creates on B Street a part o f the great frame o f the Mall envisioned by L TEnfant, holding the City back from the great central m otif in which the nation’ s tribu tes to Washington and Lincoln are enshrined as no other loca tion , however commanding, could en shrine them# Imagine these same two monuments erected anywhere in the built-up part of the City and deprived of th e ir reverent is o la tio n ! By the application o f the p rin cip le that, no matter how important the p ro jec t, it must take it s place in the treatment o f the whole, i t has been possible to make every o ffic e in the proposed group o f departmental buildings not only serve it s own purpose in the most e ffic ie n t way but do it s part in paying homage to the great central m otif of the City and to the majestic sim p licity of the L*Enfapt Plan This treatment points the way fo r the loca tion and design of such * ? « "buildings ©s w ill "be needed in the future to the west o f the Monument, and fo r the fii^ U it io n of the frame on the &outh side o f the Mall* At the present time the Mall la during the War, by the temporary "buildings erected The Munitions and Bavy "buildings should "be removed and th eir functions housed on the north side of B S treet. They now occupy a s ite o rig in a lly planted with tree s, and during the ten years since the War the "balanc ing trees on the south side have grown to such size that i t w ill be many years before a new planting on the north side, on the s ite of these buildings, can re establish the balance necessary to the settin g o f the Lincoln Memorial, president Lincoln*s action in completing the dome o f the Capitol during the stress o f the C iv il War is a sig n ific a n t challenge to the continued obstruction of the park leading up to the Capitol by these war structures. The Smithsonian Group should be studied in order that i t s future construc tions from time to time w ill u ltim a tely give i t i t s true re la tio n to the L*Enfant Plan, one of i t s u n its, the Preer G allery, having already been so placed. Another in terestin g illu s t r a t io n o f the m u ltiplied values resu ltin g from good planning is the proposed development of a municipal group at John Marshall Place. There is no more beautiful example of ea rly republican architecture in the country than the D is tric t Court House now somewhat lo s t in Judiciary Square and seen by the casual v is it o r only by accident.. By the wise choice o f a site and the understanding manner of the planning and designing o f the proposed structures, this group, without adding anything to the bulk or cost o f i t s bu ild ings, w ill frame a portion of the north side of Pennsylvania Avenue, w ill open a splendid v is ta through to the Court House bringing th is ancient building d ir e c tly into the main plan o f the City, and create a monumental frontage fo r the south side o f Judiciary Square, while in turn the old Court House w ill add it s d is tin c tio n to the municipal group by occupying the end of it s p rin cip al court, much as the Madeleine is seen when looking from the Place de l a Concopde. I t was fo r these reasons that the MacMillan Commission, a fte r an exhaustive study o f the problems confronting the City- in 1900, determined that no plan of the C ity could be devised which would ensure a nobler future than that prepared by Major L ’ Enfant in collaboration with Washington and Jefferson* ’This Com mission reaffirm ed that plan and extended i t to meet the many new conditions which had asserted themselves and. modified i t only where o rigin a l opportunities had been permanently lo s t . Many of the proposals o f the plan of 1901 fo r park extensions and. building; locations have not been re a lized and some of them are no longer a vailable* Other great assets of the Capital pointed out in that plan are s t i l l ava ila b le but may not long remain so. I have in mind the development of the great scenic region extending from Potomac Park un t© and including the'.‘(Jreat Falls o f the Potomac. The lower portion of the r iv e r is now happily made a vailable by the le g is la tio n creating Mount Vernon Boulevard. With a park development extending from this boulevard up to and including the F a lls , Washington would have a r iv e r park un riv a lle d by any of the world* s c a p ita ls . The p ro jec t o f the Fort Drive con necting the ring of C iv il War fo rts occupying the heights around the C ity is rapidly becoming almost impossible of re a liz a tio n . On the other hand much that was proposed by the report and Plan of 1901 has been re a lized , some of i t , notably the ra ilro a d situ ation , in spite of what might have been regarded as insurmountable obstacles. The greatness o f the plan fo r the Mall, in it s ultim ate simple d ign ity, appealed to the imagination of the then president of the Pennsylvania Failroad and resulted, in clearing the way fo r a rea liza tio n of the Plan not only in the development of the Mall but in the creation of a great gateway to the City in the form of the Union Station and plaza as now constructed, and the development of the land from the station to the Capitol as now authorized. 9 The extension cf the Mall and the lo ca tio n of the Lincoln Memorial represent additions to the o rig in a l plan c f elements unknown at the time of i t s creation, while- the Memorial Bridge, connecting th# heart of the City with the memories of the Nation* s dead at Arlington, completes the greater central not i f o f the Plan of 1901 now approaching re a liza tio n * The Grant and Meade memorials in Union Plaza ensure thé development o f the head of the Mall as planned and the removal of the temporary war "buildings w ill make possible the opening of the Mall from the Capitol to the Monument* From the Mohunient to the Lincoln Memorial, the plan has been re a lized and the Arlington Bridge is w ell under construction. The Washington Monument Gardens remain to he treated as a part of the.Mall scheme and of the in tersectio n o f the White House axis with that c f the Mall* I t had been hoped tnat tn is might be a p roject inaugurated in connection with Washington* s 200th Birthday* B Street North was planned as a great ceremonial s tre e t, over which corteges might pass, from the dome of the Capitol to the Arlington National Cemetery. [This also has been provided fo r and should be re a liz e d in the near future • The proposal that the gardens o f the Mall should include buildings o f the museum type has been p a rtly re a liz e d by the location o f the National Museum and the Freer Gallery* Tne proposal that a le g is la t iv e group should be created around Capitol Square and an executive group about Lafayette Square has been p a rtly re a lize d in the creation of the Senate and House O ffic e Buildings and the proposed additional House O ffic e Building* tion proposed* The Supreme Court has also been authorized in the lo ca Hock Greek Park has been enlarged and extended, Potomac Park la rg e ly rea lized , and work on the Anacostia Park begun. A ll of these p rojects have taken th e ir places as elements o f one great plan and would have lo s t much of th e ir significan ce i f treated as unrelated units lik e the In te r io r Department Building* io The buildings of the early Republic were models of good taste, sound design, and "beauty o f mass, proportion and d e t a il. These buildings represented a standard unsurpassed in any of the p riva te or semi-public work throughout the country* J efferso n 1s in terest in architecture is h is to r ic and h is doctrine of the ob ligation o f. the Government to set an example in the arts of design governed the ea rly development o f the national C&pital and should fin d expression today in a ll the works of the Federal Government. In addition to the ob liga tion of the Federal and D is tric t governments, the obligation to maintain an appropriate character of the City extends to owners of private property. In this connection we learn of another of the many examples of President Washington*s wisdom and v isio n . In the o rigin a l terms governing the building of the Capital he made the design and m aterials of construction of private structures subject to such regulations as might be thought necessary to ensure th e ir appropriateness. Unhappily th is control has long since been re linquished but i t is a matter fo r congratulation that the le g is la tio n recently proposed fo r re-establishment of such control has received the almost unanimous approval o f the Citizens of Washington and i t is to be hoped that before long such le g is la tio n may be enacted into law. Our National fo re s ts and parks witness our fa it h that the beauty o f woodland and meadow are as necessary to a wholesome national l i f e as th eir material products. The building of our national Capital should witness the same fa ith . In closin g, l e t me again repeat and leave with you the statement that no c it y can have d ign ity, beauty and d istin ctio n , or be a great c it y in the best sense of the word unless i t s every element is an appropriate part of a greater whole. The Plan of 1901 has never been o f f i c i a l l y adopted; i t s in tr in s ic merit has given i t force and carried conviction. Since 1901 the Ustionai Commission of - 11 - Fine Arts has been created and mere recen tly the National Capital Park and Planning Commission. These two agencies have "been governed in th e ir a6.vice and decisions on a ll in dividu al p ro jec ts by the relatio n such p ro jec ts bear to the City as one great u n it. /c UNITED STATES SENATE FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, APRIL 26, 1929, or when delivcrdd* ’'Appropriations fo r Public B u ildin gs.» Address o f Honorable Reed Smoot, Chairman of the Public Buildings Commission, at a Meeting on the Development of the City of Washington held at the United States Chamber of Commerce Building Washington . A pril 25, 1929. » /ó/ £he president hos to ld you o f the great importance o f the work on which we are engaged in "building a "beautiful c a p ita l c ity * Now, I want, in a very few words, to t e l l you o f the ways and means "by which we hope to accomolish i t . Por a quarter of a century I have had a desire arid u n fa ilin g fa it h that I would see Washington, America’ s Cenital City, the most beau tifu l c it y in the world. The re a liz a tio n o f this desire and fa ith is near at hand. I c a ll to mind that the la te Senator Heyburn and myself, twenty-one years ago, thought the time had arrived to purchase the p riv a te ly owned land in the tria n gle and had in mind the beginning o f the erection o f buildings to supply the needs o f the Govern ment, thus making i t the center o f the nations a c t iv it ie s . Senator Heyburn exhibited dravdngs o f a type o f building he thought ought to be approved. appropriation of $10,000,000 was asked fo r the purchase o f the land. This vast sum asked fo r at that time was the death kn ell of the plan. Por one I am thankful i t fa ile d fo r i f it' had succeeded we would never have had anything to compare with the plans now f u lly under way. A Twenty M illio n appropriation in 1908 is f a i r l y comparable with 200 M illio n s today, the amount that w ill be required to complete the present tria n gle building program. Congress has already authorized $75,000,000 fo r public buildings in the D is tric t o f Columbia. Of th is amount $50,000,000 is to be used fo r construction of buildings and $25,000,000 fo r the acqu isition o f land on which these buildings are to be erected. Most of this la t t e r sum w ill be spent in acquiring land in the so -ca lled Triangle Area, extending along Pennsylvania Avenue from F ifteen th Street to the Capitol and bounded on the south side by the M all. The former sum o f $50,000,000 w ill include a s ite which has already been purchased fo r the Supreme Court Building, facin g the Capitol and extending along East Capitol Street, covering an area approximating that o f the Congressional Library on the soutn side o f the s tr e e t. A commissionj of which the Chief Justice is Chairman, is now securing a design fo r the building. - 2 - A.s regards acquiring s ite s , there are twenty-three c ity blocks involved and o f th is number four have been purchased, nine are now in process o f con demnation, and condemnation proceedings w ill be started fo r six within the next month* This leaves only four blocks yet to be appropriated fo r, and i t is ex pected that, shortly a fte r the next regular session o f Congress convenes, an appropriation w ill be made to complete the purchase o f the land in question* How fo r the buildings; Under the $50,000,000 authorization, $43,500,000 w ill be expended fo r construction, the balance to be expended fo r s ites fo r certain o f these p ro jec ts . Some of th is work is now under way. An Admin is tra tio n Building connecting the two ex istin g wings o f the Department of A gri culture is being b u ilt at a cost of $2,000,000. The A gricultural Department w ill also have another building to be constructed shortly on the south side of the Administration Building, containing a number o f lab oratories and housing many a c t iv it ie s now ) scattered in other buildings. An extension to the G-overnment F rin tin g O ffic e w ill be made at a cost of $1,250,000. A beau tifu l building fo r the Bureau o f Internal Revenue is being bu ilt at a cost o f $10,000,000. This building w ill be a part of the Triangle Development and w ill cover the area bounded by Tenth, Twelfth, B and C Streets . Htrth West. over two years. I t is expected that th is building w ill be completed in a l i t t l e I t w ill house a ll the a c t iv it ie s o f the Internal Revenue Bureau now so widely scattered throughout the C ity. A building fo r the Department o f Commerce is being erected at a cost of $17,500,000. I t is the la rg est building that w ill be constructed in the Triangle Area and w ill be over one thousand fe e t in length along F ifteen th Street, and w ill extend from the Mall to Pennsylvania Avenue and Fourteenth Street. . . An Archives Building has been authorized at a lim it of cost o f $8,750,000. This w ill be one o f the most important buildings in the Triangle group. It 3 w ill house the archives and valuable records o f the Government which are now scattered in many buildings, some of which are not fir e - p r o o f. Designs are being made fo r other buildings in the Triangle group, fo r the Departments o f Justice and Labor and the In terstate Commerce Commission and other independent establishments, as you w ill see by a model o f these buildings on view in the adjoining room. When fin a lly completed, the Triangle Area w ill contain a most magnificent group of bu ildings. These buildings, by grouping together rela ted governmental a c t iv it ie s , w ill g rea tly add. to the convenience of those doing business with the Government. They w i l l also make i t possible to operate the Government mere e f f ic i e n t l y and, in the end, more economically by putting an end to the large rent b i l l which the Government is now paying fo r o ffic e s to house the Departments of Ju stice, Labor, Commerce, and others. In addition to the Triangle p ro jec t, i t is expected that additional accom modations w ill be provided fo r the L e g is la tiv e Branch of the Government by con structing an addition to the House O ffic e Building cn the south side o f thè the C apitol, at an estimated cost o f $7,500,000; and by enlarging the Senate O ffice Building, thus completing the quadrangle of which the present building forms three sides, -„th e cost of which is not established but w ill probably be somewhat over $2,000,000. Ah appropriation o f $4,912,414 has been authorized fo r completing the park between the Capitol and the Union Station and also carrying out the long delayed plans fo r the development of the M all. At the western end o f the Mall the Arlington Memorial Bridge is new under way, and when fin a lly compieted. w i l l represent a to ta l cost of $14,750,000. This w ill include, besides the bridge, the construction o f a plaza west o f the Lincoln Memorial, the imorovement of Columbia Island in the Potomac, a formal terraced avenue on the V irg in ia side leading to Arlington Cemetery, and the widening o f several streets in Washington to give suitable approach to the Bridge. - 4 A ll o f these plans, when carried out, w ill add g re a tly to the convenience and “beauty o f the c i t y . They w ill not involve a very great outlay each year* por the great Triangle Development, i t has "been estimated that only $11,000,000 w ill "be expended this year, and next year only $24,000,000* The plans have "been c a re fu lly made and w ill, I "believe, meet general ap proval. I am a strong "believer'in the necessity o f carrying forward th is great work in an orderly and S3rstematic manner and am confident that, in so doing, we w ill merit the thanks and approbation o f future generations who w ill come here to view the work which we have done. REASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, HORNING PAPERS APRIL 26, 1929, or when delivered.» SPEECH OP HONORABLE A. W. MELLÔN SECRETART OP THE TREASURY AT THE MEETING ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON HELD AT THE UNITED STATES CHAMBER OP COMMERCE BUILDING WASHINGTON APRIL 25, 1929 Tonight H istory repeats i t s e l f * We are met under circumstances almost id en tica l with those under which a meeting was held tw enty-five years ago in the old Arlington H otel, only a short distance from th is place. Then, as now, i t was a meeting of those representing the G-overnment, and i t was held fo r the purpose of considering plans to make more beau tifu l the City o f Washington. The prin cip al sneaker on that occasion was President Roosevelt. Tne Congress of the United States was represented by the speeches of Speaker Cannon and others; and Hr. Root, with h is great eloquence, championed the cause which he had so much at heart and which he, him self, had done so much to advance* On that h is to r ic occasion, the host was the American In stitu te of Architect I t is most f it t i n g , therefore, that tonight we should have .as our guests the representatives o f that great and in flu e n tia l organization, to whose foresigh t and u n tirin g e ffo r t s we owe not only the reviva l but the preservation and. advancement o f a plan fo r the orderly and systematic development of the nation’ s ca p ital* The meeting held in 1905 centered attention on the needs of Washington* At the same time i t made certain that the future development of the c it y should conform to a balanced and comprehensive plan, based upon the spacious and d ig n ifie d ideas of President Washington and Major L fEnfant, with such m odifications as might be required to meed modern conditions and the c i t y ’ s growth* How we are engaged in tryin g to carry out those ideas. Conditions have reached a stage where econorxy demands that the G-overnment1s a c t iv it ie s should be adequately housed in buildings owned by the G-oveftiment i t s e l f ; and, in order to meet th is need, Congress has mode the necessary appropriations to begin this work and to proceed with certain other plans fo r the orderly development of 2 the city* The responsibility for the condemnation and purchase of sites and the erection of most of these buildings has been placed by Congress on the Treasury Department and has become, therefore, an integral part of Treasury activities* The placing of these buildings involves a great responsibility, for the proper determination of this question will largely influence the future develop ment of Washington. Before coming to a decision, the Treasury obtained the advice of Mr. Edward H. Bennett of Chicago, a well-known architect, whose efforts have had so much to do with bringing to completion the plans for beautifying his native city. Mr. Bennett was appointed Consulting Architect of the Treasury; and, with a small group of other eminent architects from different parts of the country, has given 'unstintedly of his services in arriving at a solution of this problem* These men have come to Washington at frequent intervals and have served without adequate remuneration in helping to work out a plan under which the new buildings shall be grouped and designed in such a way as to contribute in the greatest measure possible to the beauty of Washington. In evolving these plans the Treasury has had the cooperation of the Pine Arts Commission ana its able and devoted Chairman, Mr. Moore; with the Capital Park and Planning Com mission; the Office of Public Buildings and Parks; and especially with those members of the Senate and House of Representatives who are most directly "... I 1 ;iffl ' If : ¡1 ' ' ■■■/■;- ' I . I |■■ concerned! in this work and who have been so largely responsible for the developments now under way. All of these developments have been embodied in a comprehensive Plan; and it is this Plan which will be presented to you tonight. We want also to have you view the Model which has been made of public buildings to be erected along ^Pennsylvania Avenue. This Model is on view tonight in a mm sis room adjoining the one in which we are now, and w ill "be taken la t e r to the Treasury where i t w ill be l e f t permanently on exh ib ition fo r a ll who care to view it * I t was to place these plans before you and also to make something in the nature of a visual presentation through motion pictu res that have been prepared, that we have asked th is distinguished audience to come together tonight* I hope that the plans w ill meet with your approval, so that we can proceed with carrying them out, f o r t i f i e d in the knowledge that we have your sanction and support. I am sure in advance o f your deep in te re s t, fo r i t is a work which makes a strong appeal to every one and gives us a l l an opportunity to do something of permanent value fo r the country. No one has taken a deeper in te re s t in this great -undertaking than has President -Hoover. In a l l the things that have been done and are now under way, he has given h is counsel and supuort, and behind the plans which have been made fo r the future he has placed the f u l l force o f h is Administration. It is a great p r iv ile g e to have him here tonight, and to have the honor of. announc ing the President o f the United States who w ill now address you. TREASURY DEPART?'ENT FOR RELEASE, ?'CRNING PAPERS, APRIL 27, 1929, or when delivered SPEECH QP EDWARD H. BENNETT, CHAIRSIN, ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS, TREASURY DEPART?HINT, AT A MEETING ON THE DEVELOPMENT OE THE CITY OP WASHINGTON HELD AT THE UNITED STATES CHAMBER OP COMMERCE BUILDING WASHINGTON APRIL 26, 1929. , I am to speak about the development of Washington, with special reference to the areas in which the new departmental and other Government buildings w ill i■ be placed* This area, roughly speaking, l i e s between Pennsylvania Avenue and Maryland Avenue, the Capitol and the Monument. I shall r e fe r most s p e c ific a lly in my remarks to the area now known as the "T ria n gle", between Pennsylvania Avenue and B Street, and, since th is whole subject has been so splendidly covered in the speech of the Secretary of the Treasury recently at Pittsburgh, I shall quote in places from his statement. I t is obvious at the start that th is, although an element in the plan of Washington, is a very important one in the composition o f it s plan, and p a rtic u larly o f the plan of the future Washington. I should lik e to emphasize at the start the orderly relationship o f the plan o f th is great section of land to that of the ?/hole M all. "Congress has made the necessary appropriation to in it ia t e this work and to carry out the most important features of that long neg~ le c te d plan of Washington and L*Enfant fo r the development o f the c it y . The re sp o n sib ility fo r carrying out this plan, by the pur chase o f s ites and the erection' of buildings, was placed by Congress on the Secretary of the Treasury and has become, therefore, an in teg ra l part of Treasury a c t i v i t i e s . " The present gathering meets in a sense to pay a tribu te to order, as I see it , a human order, the product of centuries of c iv iliz a t io n as expressed in the thoughts o f men and the works o f th e ir hands. so fa r as one can see. I t is not the order o f nature That we may r e a liz e by taking a trro out into the Cosmos under the guidance o f a great s c ie n tis t lik e Jeans, Eddington, or our own M illik en . We encounter nebulae, g a la c tic clu sters, solar systems, myriad masses o f suns and so-called cosmic dust, into the in fin it e . whorls, everywhere! But sp irals, No tangible arrangement as recognized by the cu ltivated in te llig en ce o f the human being. _ p _ One returns with a sense of r e l i e f to considerations of order as related to the human mind, expressed in i t s arch itectu ral works, and with joy i f we can see the beauty o f this order and it s rhythm. I t is an order more nearly related to that natural to the smaller expressions of the creation as evidenced by the structures of crysta ls, plant l i f e and animal l i f e , the compositions o f which a ll relate to a simple plan in which there are dominant and subordinate elements. We are this evening to get a glimpse of the beauty o f Washington in it s past, present and future. To do that.we must f i r s t see and appreciate the underlying system or order of i t s great plan. An architectu ral planJ made. We may w ell re jo ic e that the o rigin a l plan was Suppose fo r example there had been no plan of L ’ Enfant and General Washington. I t might e a s ily have been the case as has been the fa te of most other great ca p ita ls ea rly founded, whose plans have been la t e r r e c t ifie d , and as in the case o f P a ris, made superb'. Most c it ie s have grown from a congerie of huts, evolved more or less according to the n ecessities of the situ ation as con trolled by the growing in te llig e n c e o f the inhabitants. . But in the case of Washington enough great precedent had been established - a conscious idea of c ity planning existed in Europe and very d is tin c tly in the ea rly days of the United States* The orderly mind o f the great Washington saw the necessity of planning ahead of the actual needs and he must have seen the possible beauty of a c it y planned on formal lin e s - formal or perhaps more co rrectly , regular lin e s . ,• e s s e n tia lly a formal age. . I t was Uo doubt l i f e pulsated ju st as keenly in humanity as today, but i t seemed more d iscip lin ed and in it s social contacts, ordered. Hence the ordered and rhythmic expression o f the architecture of the day, and hence, added to the great new outlook in l i f e on a vast continent, the p o te n tia lity of which was becoming apparent, the in s tin c tiv e , - i f not conscious aim to la y founda tions in an orderly and comprehensive manner. • Honce the Washington of the past. The Washington o f the present is the expression of the early nlan o f 1790, stin fla te d and corrected hy the great plan o f the Park Commission o f 1301 "out as yet incomplete in it s execution. The Washington of the future, "based on that which has gone "before, must "be the result of our e ffo r t s of today. Let alone, i t would end in chaos, as has been demonstrated by some of the attempts ignorantly proposed in v io la tio n of the o rig in a l plan. Given meager support, the fin a l resu lt w ill be no b etter than i t is today, but given great and concentrated attention and enthusiastic support by the nation through it s representatives and that c o lle c tio n o f splendid men who are givin g th e ir time fr e e ly in it s in te rest, o f f i c i a l l y and u n o ffic ia lly f it w ill become superbi That is why tonight we are looking at the plan of Washington, and I hope, with the keenest appreciation of the fa c t that there was the o rig in a l plan of the C&pital• The perspective we have, the past experience of c iv iliz a t io n centering on the o rig in a l plan, it s renewal in the plan o f 1901, and today substantial ex pansion of that plan, an expansion which is also a consolidation. Through a ll th is development there have been great p erso n a lities involved. Most of them are known to you in h is to ry . I t is my personal desire to acknowl edge our good fortune in that the work o f today has received not only the support of our leading Executive, but an important nart of i t has been under the direction of the man who, having had the power to help the re a liz a tio n , had also the visio n and desire to do so. I allude, o f course, to our great Secretary Mellon. I hope what I have said ?/ill not seem too fa r a fie ld , because I think i t is so important that we should r e a liz e that this great group of departmental bu ild ings to which I re fe r in general outline, is so strongly related to the general composition of the plan of Washington. The main axis of the Trian gle group is p a ra llel to the Mall, not yet comoleted, stretching from the Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial. The L rEnfant plan did not have compositions la t e r a l to the Mall, alt^ougn they might w ell have been incorporated even in that day, as that would have resembled an arrangement o f the great eighteenth century French plans from which the plan o f Washington was re a lly evolved, the main axis o f the Triangle plan has this further ju s t ific a t io n in precedent. a series of great axes in extension o f ex istin g stre ets. i t is traversed by A ll th is can be seen on the plans and diagrams in the moving pictu res. Important as is th is group o f the Triangle, i t must bo remembered that sim ilar developments, though not so extensive, are proposed fo r the south side of the Mall, and in order to complete the picture of th is great composition, which w ill slowly be rea lized , one must include the planning of the Capitol ap proach from the Union Station, including the new park area to the north of the Capitol and the magnificent approach from the gateway o f the c ity by the Union Station to the head o f the M all. These plans, i f ca rried out, founded as they are on a great and substantial id ea l, should measure up to the requirements of tne Capital of this great country. HI t is intended to carry through, as rapidly as possible, the most pressing needs as regards housing of government departments and a c t iv it ie s . These w ill include a new and la rg e r building fo r the increased a c t iv it ie s o f the Department of Commerce; a Supreme Court building; a building fo r the Bureau of Internal Revenue; an . Archives Building; a building fo r.th e Department o f A gricu ltu re; s t i l l another fo r the Department of Labor, and several others besides. One o f these buildings, that fo r the Supreme Court, w ill be placed on Capitol K i l l ; but, as regards the others, advantage w ill be taken ox^this opportunity to group them together in such a way as to con trib u te in the greatest measure possible to the beauty o f Washington. "The general p rin cip le has been established that no large de partmental buildings are to be placed in the M all, as was at f i r s t proposed, but that the Mall is to be reserved fo r nark purposes and as a s ite fo r buildings of a rmiseum-like character. Departmental buildings are to be placed along the south side o f Pennsylvania Avenue from the Treasury to the' C apitol. In ad d itio n to facing on Pennsylvania Avenue, these buildings w ill face also on a grand boulevard, which is to be cut through the c it y , bordering the Mall and stretching from the Capitol to the new Memorial Bridge on the Potomac near the base o f the Lincoln Memorial. It is intended the buildings, while having each a separate and dis tinctive architectural treatment, shall he of harmonious design and grouped around two large interior courts or plazas somewhat after the arrangement of the Lsuvro in Paris.” A uniform corner height has been observed, although the architecture is varied. The ground contains seventy acres, and i t is upwards o f 3,000 fe e t in length on B S treet. Commerce Building alone. There are upwards o f one m illio n square fe e t in the The plazas are actu ally three in number; that on 12th S treet, the circu la r one, being in a sense the p ivot of the composition. In i t we have proposed a great commemorative column. The vista s w ill extend from this circu la r plaza through into the other plazas, and esp ecia lly into the Great Plaza, which, in turn, opens through an arched way on to Pennsylvania Avenue and toward the Mall, where i t has been suggested shall be placed the National Museum of A rt. The v it a l element binding the en tire group is the connection between the two la rg er plazas. A happy solution adjusted to the scale of botn has been found, crowned by a pavilion., g iv in g v a rie ty to the silhouette o f the group. " I t is easy to see what the e ffe c t w ill be. As one proceeds down Pennsylvania Avenue towards the C apitol, on the south s id e .w ill be a succession of beautiful and harmonious buildings, a ll of a design in keeping with the sem i-classical tra d itio n so w ell established in Wash ington. On the north side vis ta s w ill be opened up, so that groups of buildings, such as the beau tifu l D is tric t o f Columbia Court House on John Marshall Place, shall be brought into the general plan of Pennsyl vania Avenue. At the same time the Mall w ill present the spectacle of a great park bordered on one side by the new boulevard lin e d with beautnul buildings, a wide park-way o f greensward with it s four rows o f trees, it s drives and walks, statues and r e fle c tin g pools, a ll arranged in such a way that long vista s w ill be ouened up fo r views of the Capitol in one d irection and o f the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial in the other. M To re a liz e the force o f th is a xia l arrangement one must see i t a ft e r dusk. Sounds o f the a c t iv it ie s o f the c ity are heard in the distance, but the Mall, with it s three great structures, the Capitol, the Monument, and the Lincoln 3glow and re fle c te d in the pools, is s ile n t and conveys a sense o f strength; the strength and confidence of a nation. TREASURY DEPARTMENT POE RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS APRIL 26, 1929, or when delivered. SPEECH OP HONORABLE A. W. MELLON SECRETARY OP THE TREASURY AT THE MEETING- ON THE DEVELOPMENT OP THE CITY OP WASHINGTON HELD AT THE UNITED STATES CHAMBER OP COMMERCE BUILDING WASHINGTON APRIL 25, 1929. Tonight History repeats i t s e l f . We are met under circumstances almost identical with those under which a meeting was held twenty—fiv e years ago in the old Arlington Hotel, only a short distance from th is p lace. Then, as now, it was a meeting o f those representing the Government, and i t was held fo r the purpose o f considering plans to make more beautiful the City o f Washington. The prin cip al speaker on that occasion was President Roosevelt. The Congress of the United States was represented "by the speeches o f Speaker Cannon and others; and Mr. Root, with his great eloquence, chanpioned the cause which he had so much at heart and which he, him self, had done so much to advance. On that h isto ric occasion, the host was the American Institute o f Architects It is most fit t in g , therefore, that tonight we should have as our guests the representatives o f that great and in flu e n tia l organization, to whose foresight and untirin g e ffo rts we owe not only the rev iv al hut the preservation and advancement o f a plan fo r the orderly and systematic development o f the nation1s cap ital. The meeting held in 1905 centered attention on the needs o f Washington. At the same time it made certain that the future development of the city should conform to a “balanced and comprehensive plan, based upon the spacious and d ign ified ideas o f President Washington and Major L 1Enfant, with such modifications as might he -required to meed modern conditions and the city*s growth. How we are engaged in trying to carry out those ideas. Conditions have reached a stage where econoa$r demands that the Government^ a c tiv itie s should he adequately housed in “buildings owned hy the Government i t s e l f ; and, in order to $ meet this need, Congress has made the necessary appropriations to begin this work and to proceed with certain other plans fo r the orderly development of - the city* 2 - The re sp o n sib ility fo r the condemnation and purchase of sites and the erection o f most of these buildings has been placed by Congress on the Treasury Department and has become, therefore, and in tegral part o f Treasury a c tiv itie s * The placing of these buildings involves a great re sp o n sib ility , fo r the proper determination of this question w i ll la r g e ly influence the future develop ment o f Washington. Before coming to a decision, the Treasury obtained the advice o f Mr* Edward H. Bennett o f Chicago, a well-known arch itect, whose e ffo rts have had so much to do with bringing to completion the plans fo r beautifying his native city . Mr. Bennett was appointed Consulting Architect o f the Treasury; and, with a small groi^) o f other eminent architects from d iffe re n t parts o f the countiy, has given unstintedly o f his services in a rriv in g at a solution o f th is problem. These men have come to Washington at frequent intervals and have served without adequate remuneration in helping to work out a plan under which the new buildings sh all be grouped and designed in such a way as to contributed in the greatest measure possible to the beauty o f Washington. In evolving these plans the Treasury has had the cooperation of the 2*ine Arts Commission and it s able and devoted Chairman, Mr. Moore; with the Capital Park and Planning Com mission; the O ffice of Public Buildings and Parks; and esp e c ia lly with those members o f the Senate and House of Eepresentatives who are most d ire c tly concerned in this work and who have been so la rg e ly responsible fo r the developments now under way. A ll of these developments have been embodied in a comprehensive Plan; and i t is this Plan which w i ll be presented to you tonight. We want also to have you view the Model which has been made to public buildings to be erected along Pennsylvania Avenue. This Model is on view tonight in a room adjoinging the one in. which we are now, and w ill he taken la t e r to the Treasury where i t w ill he l e f t permanently on exhibition fo r a l l who care to view i t . I t was to place these plans before you and also to make something in the nature o f a visu al presentation through motion pictures that have been prepared, that we have asked this distinguished audience to come together tonight, I hope that the plans w i ll meet with your approval, so that we can proceed with carrying them out, fo r t ifie d in the knowledge that we have your sanction and support. I am sure in advance o f your deep in terest, fo r it is a work which makes a strong appeal to eveiy one and gives us a l l an opportunity to do something o f permanent value fo r the country. Ho one has taken a deeper interest in this great undertaking than has President Hoover. In a l l the things that have been done and are now under way, he has given his counsel and support, and behind the plans which have been made fo r the future he has placed the f u l l force of his Administration. It is a great p riv ile g e to have him here tonight, and to have the honor of announcing the President o f the United States who w ill now address you. TREASURY DEPARTMENT POE EBLEIA.SE, MORNING PAPERS, APRIL 27, 1929, or when delivered, SPEECH OF EDWARD H. BENNETT, CHAIRMAN, ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, AT A MEETING ON THE DEVELOPMENT OP THE CITY OP WASHINGTON HELD AT THE UNITED STATES CHAMBER OP COMMERCE BUILDING WASHINGTON APRIL 26, 1929. I am to speak about the development o f Washington, with special reference to the areas in which the new departmental and other G-ovemment "buildings w ill "be placed, fh is area, roughly speaking, l i e s "between Pennsylvania Avenue and Maryland Avenue, the Capitol and the Monument. I sh all r e fe r most s p e c ific a lly in my remarks to the area now known as the ^Triangle**, "between Pennsylvania Avenue and B Street, and, since this whole subject has been so splendidly covered in the speech o f the Secretary of the Treasury recently at Pittsburgh, I sh all quote in places from his statement. It is obvious at the start that th is, although an element in the plan o f Washington, is a very important one in the composition o f it s plan, and p artic u la r ly of the plan o f the future Washington. I should lik e to emphasize at the start the orderly relationship o f the plan o f this great section o f land to that o f the whole M all. ^Congress has made the necessary appropriation to in itia te this work and to carry out the most important features of that long neg lected plan o f Washington and L ’Enfant fo r the development o f the c ity . The resp o n sib ility fo r carrying out this plan, by the pur chase o f site s and the erection o f buildings, was placed by Congress on the Secretary o f the Treasury and has become, therefore, an in tegral part o f Treasury a c tiv itie s .^ The present gathering meets in a sense to pay a tribute to order, as I see i t , a human order, the product o f centuries o f c iv iliz a t io n as expressed in the thoughts of men and the works o f th eir hands. so fa r as one can see. I t is not the order o f nature That we may re a lize by taking a trip out into the cosmos under the guidance o f a great sc ie n tist lik e Jeans, Eddington, or our own M illiken . We encounter nebulae, galactic clusters, so la r systems, myriad masses o f suns aud so-called cosmic dust, into the in fin it e . whorls, everywhere! But s p ira ls , Ho tangible arrangement as recognized by the cultivated intelligence o f the human being. - 2 - One returns with, a sense o f r e l i e f to considerations of order as related to the Vmfflfl.n mind, expressed in it s architectural works, and with joy i f we can see the beauty o f this order and it s rhythm# I t is an order more nearly related to that natural to the smaller expressions of the creation as evidenced by the structures o f c ry stals, plant l i f e and animal l i f e , the compositions of which a l l relate to a simple plan in which there are dominant and subordinate elements. We are this evening to get a glimpse of the beauty of Washington in it s past, present and future* To do that we must f i r s t see and appreciate the underlying system or order of it s great plan* An architectural plan I made* We may w ell rejo ice that the o rig in a l plan was Suppose fo r example there had been no plan o f L 1Enfant and General Washington* I t might e a sily have been the case as has been the fate of most other great capitals early founded, whose plans have been la t e r r e c tifie d , and as in the case o f P a ris, made superb. Most c itie s have grown from a congerie of huts, evolved more or le s s according to the necessities of the situation as controlled by the growing in telligen ce of the inhabitants* But in the case of Washington enough great precedent had been established — a conscious idea of city planning existed in Europe and very d is tin c tly in the e a rly days of the United States. The orderly mind of the great Washington saw the necessity of planning ahead of the actual needs and he must have seen the possible beauty o f a c ity planned on formal lin e s - formal or perhaps more correctly, regular lin e s* essen tially a formal age. It was Wo doubt l i f e pulsated just as keenly in humanity as today, but i t seemed more disciplin ed and in it s social contacts, ordered. Hence the ordered and rhythmic expression o f the architecture of the day, and hence, added to the great new outlook in l i f e on a vast continent, the p o te n tia lity of which was becoming apparent, the in stin ctive, i f not conscious aim to la y founda tions in an orderly and comprehensive manner* Hence the Washington o f the past* /£<* - 3 She Washington o f the present is the expression of the early plan o f 1790, stimulated and corrected by the great plan o f the Park Commission of 1901 but as yet incomplete in it s execution* 3?he Washington o f the future, "based on that which has gone before, must he the result o f our e ffo rts o f today* Let alone, it would end in chaos, as has been demonstrated by some o f the attempts ignorantly proposed in v io la tio n of the o rigin al p lan . Given meager support, the fin a l resu lt w i ll be no better than i t is today, but given great and concentrated attention and enthusiastic support by the nation through it s representatives and that collection o f splended men who are giving th e ir time fre e ly in it s interest, o f f i c i a l l y and u n o ffic ia lly , it w ill become superb i That is why tonight we are looking at the plan o f Washington, and I hope, with the keenest appreciation o f the fact that there was the o rig in a l plan o f the Capital* The perspective we have, the past experience o f c iv iliz a t io n centering on the o rigin al plan, it s renewal in the plan o f 1901, and today substantial ex pansion of that plan, and expansion which is also a consolidation* Through a l l this development there have been great p erso n alities involved* Most o f them are known to you in history* I t is my personal desire to acknowl edge our good fortune in that the work o f today has received not only the support 1 of our leading Executive, but an important part o f it has been under the direction of the man who, having had the power to help the re a liza tio n , had also the vision and desire to do so* I allude, of course, to our great Secretary Mellon* I hope what I have said w ill not seem too f a r a f ie ld , because I think i t is so important that we should re a liz e that this great group o f departmental build ings to which I re fe r in general outline, is so strongly related to the general composition o f the plan o f Washington. The main axis o f the Triangle group is p a r a lle l to the M all, not yet coupleted, stretching from the Capitol to the / - Lincoln Memorial* 4 - The L*Enfant plan did not have compositions la t e r a l to the Mall, although they mi^ht w ell have "been incorporated even in that day, as that would have resembled an arrangement o f the great eighteenth century French plans from which the plan of Washington was r e a lly evolved, the main axis o f the Triangle plan has this further ju s tific a tio n in precedent. a series of great axes in extension o f existin g streets* I t is traversed by A ll this can he seen on the plans and diagrams in the moving pictu res. Important as is this group of the Triangle, it must he remembered that sim ilar developments, though not so extensive, are proposed fo r the south side of the M all, and in order to couplets the picture o f this great composition, which w ill slowly he realized , one must include the planning of the Capitol ap proach from the Union Station, including the new park area to the north of the Capitol and the magnificent approach from the gateway o f the c ity by the Union Station to the head of the M all. These plans, i f carried out, founded as they are on a great and substantial id eal, should measure up to the requirements of the Capital o f this great country. " I t is intended to carry through, as rapidly as p o ssib le, the most pressing needs as regards housing o f government departments and a c t iv it ie s . These w i ll include a new and la rg e r building fo r the increased a c tiv itie s o f the Department of Commerce; a Supreme Court buildin g; a buildin g fo r the Bureau o f Internal Revenue; an Archives Building; a building fo r the Department of Agriculture; s t i l l another fo r the Department of Labor, and several others besides. One of these buildings, that fo r the Supreme Court, w i l l be placed on Capitol H ill; but, as regards the others, advantage w i l l be taken o f this opportunity to group them together in such a way as to con tribute in the greatest measure possible to the beauty of Washington. "The general p rin cip le has been established that no large de partmental buildings are to be placed in the M all, as was at f i r s t proposed, but that the Mall is to be reserved fo r park purposes and as a site fo r buildings o f a museum-like character. "Departmental buildings are to be placed along the south side o f Pennsylvania Avenue from the Treasury to the Capitol. In ad dition to facing on Pennsylvania Avenue, these buildings w ill face also on a grand boulevard, which is to be cut through the city, bordering the Mall and stretching from the Capitol to the new Memorial Bridge on the Potomac near the Base of the Lincoln Memorial. It is intended the "buildings, while having each a separate and dis tin ctive architectural treatment, sh all he of harmonious design and grouped around two large in te rio r courts or plazas somewhat a ft e r the arrangement o f the Louvre in P a r is .” A uniform corner height has "been observed, although the architecture is varied. The ground contains seventy acres, and i t is upwards o f 3,000 feet in length on B Street. Commerce Building alone* There are upwards o f one m illion square feet in the The plazas are actu ally three in number; that on 12th Street, the c irc u la r one, being in a sense the pivot o f the composition. In it we have proposed a great commemorative column. The vistas w ill extend from this c irc u la r plaza through into the other plazas, and esp ecially into the Great Plaza, which, in turn, opens through an arched way on to Pennsylvania Avenue and toward the M all, where it has been suggested sh a ll be placed the Hational Museum o f A rt. The v it a l element binding the entire group is the connection between the two la r g e r p lazas. A happy solution adjusted to the scale of both has been found, crowned by a p av ilio n giving variety to the silhouette o f the group. BIt is easy to see what the effe c t w i l l be. As one proceeds down Pennsylvania Avenue towards the Capitol, on the south side w ill be a succession of beautiful and harmonious buildings, a l l o f a design in keeping with the sem i-classical trad itio n so w ell established in Wash ington. On the north side vistas w ill be opened up, so that groups of buildings, such as the beau tifu l D is tric t of Columbia Court House on John Marshall Place, sh all be brought into the general plan o f Pennsyl vania Avenue. At the same time the Mall w i l l present the spectacle o f a great park bordered on one side by the new boulevard lined with beau tifu l buildings, a wide park-way of greensward with its four rows o f trees, it s drives and walks, statues and re fle c tin g pools, a l l arranged in such a way that long vistas w ill be opened up fo r views o f the Capitol in one d irection and of the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial in the: other.w To realize the force of th is a x ia l arrangement one must see i t a ft e r dusk. Sounds o f the a c t iv it ie s of the city are heard in the distance, but the Mali, with it s three great structures, the Capitol, the Monument, and the Lincoln aglow and reflected in the pools, is silen t and conveys a sense of strength; the strength and confidence o f a nation. i y®| On ‘behalf of the Treasury Department» i t gives me great pleasure to accept th is beau tifu l ta b let which the Kiwanis club of Washington has placed on th is h is to r ic spot. This ta b let does more than merely indicate the place where a famous treaty was signed. I t marks also the beginning of that firm and la s tin g friendship which ex ists today between Canada and the United States-a friendship which, I am convinced, w ill grow stronger with the years because it is grounded on mutual respect and a determination always to work together in solving the problems that confront us. The Webster-Ashburton Treaty is the corner-stone on which that friendship rests. I t settled one of those d i f f ic u lt questions involving boundary lin es and disputed righ ts, which might so e a s ily have poisoned our re la tio n s in the beginning and are usually such a fr u it fu l source of ir r it a t io n and even enmity between nations. At the time the treaty was negotiated, such a state of international ir r it a t io n had indeed arisen and the tension was very great when Lord Ashburton on behalf o f Canada and Great B rita in , and Daniel Webster fo r the United States, determined to a rrive at a solution which would be f a i r to both nations and would end th is controversy fo r a l l time. They succeeded in th e ir task; ana the measure o f th eir success, no le s s than the methods which they employed in bringing i t about, is f u l l of lessons fo r us today. Both negotiators were firm in th e ir determination to protect th e ir country's righ ts. At the same time they recognized the necessity always fo r proceeding in a fr ie n d ly s p ir it and fo r meeting the requirements of the oth er's p o sition . In time they found that a settlement of the disputed questions could be reached: and so, I am confident, by the use of the same methods we Lk V ~ 2 - shall fin d i t possible always to a rrive at a f a i r and sa tisfa cto ry solution of any problems that may arise between us and our Canadian frien d s, e ith e r now or in the future. The long, unbroken friendship between the two countries is one of the outstanding achievements of modern times. I t was a source o f frequent comment on the occasion of Canada's Diamond ju b ile e in 1927; and in closing I can not do b etter than to quote the words which Secretary Mellon used in pointing out the sign ifican ce which that h is to r ic occasion had fo r the United States as w ell as fo r our frien d s in Canada. " I t marks" said Mr. Mellon, "nbt only an era of great national development on the part of Canada, but also an unbroken period o f frie n d ly relation s between Canada and the United States. I t proves that friendship can be maintained between nations, no le s s than between individuals, where nations neither envy nor hate th e ir neighbors and are w illin g to in s is t, as Canada and the United States have always done, that the same rules of decency and fa ir dealing should be observed between nations as between in dividu als. The result has been a fe e lin g of friendship and good w ill and a re a liz a tio n on both sides of the border that each nation w ill b en efit by the oth er’ s continued growth and p ro sp erity ." TREASURT DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, THURSDAY, HAY 2, 1929. Secretary Mellon today made public the fo llow in g correspondence with reference to the resignation o f Hon. Eugene Meyer as Federal Farm Loan Commissioner: FEDERAL FARM LOAN BUREAU Washington A p ril 3, 1929. The President, The 'White House. Dear Mr. President; Nearly two years ago I accepted appointment as a Member of the Federal Farm Loan Board and was designated as Farm Loan Commissioner. I undertook the work, as you know, at the request of President Coolidge and Secretary Mellon in con nection with the reorganization of the Farm Loan Board to meet the situ ation which then confronted the Farm Loan System. One o f the la rg est jo in t stock land banks had ju st been placed in the hands of a re ceiver, and receiverships fo r two other jo in t stock land banks were impending; a number of Federal and jo in t stock land banks were faced with d i f f i c u l t situ ation s; public confidence was im paired; and the Farm Loan Bureau had not been adequately organized to meet it s problems. Since that time the various units o f the Farm Loan Bureau, including the ap p ra is a l, examining, and le g a l d ivis io n s, have been v ir tu a lly reconstructed, and a trained and competent organization has been developed to enable the Board properly to discharge the re s p o n s ib ilitie s devolving upon i t . Examinations of the banks and national farm loan associations are being conducted in a thorough and e ff ic ie n t manner; improper and irre g u la r p ractices that had grown up in some of the banks have been eliminated; sound accounting methods are being follow ed, and. the published statements of the condition of the banks are more accurate than ever before; the management of banks faced with d i f f ic u lt i e s has been strengthened and reorganized in cooperation with th e ir boards o f d irectors and they are now in a p o sition to deal e ff e c t iv e ly with th e ir problems; and the Farm Loan Board's supervision o f the System has been made a v it a l and e ffe c t iv e fo rce . The progress that has been made in these direction s is outlined in d e ta il in the annual report o f the Board fo r 1928, which was submitted to Congress on March 2, 1929. While, o f course, much remains to be done, as always w ill be the case in a system o f this magnitude, I think I am e n tire ly correct in saying that the task of reconstruction has been accomplished or is a c tiv e ly under way, public - 2 •* confidence has g re a tly improved, and the situ ation in a ll i t s d e ta ils is well in hand* The reorganized Board has worked harmoniously and assiduously to bring about these resu lts, and i t has had the cooperation not only o f the banks of the System gen erally but also of a large number of public s p ir ite d men in various sections of the country. I hope and b elieve that what has been done during the past two years has m aterially strengthened the System and w ill prove to be o f permanent value to the a gricu ltu ral in terests which i t was created by the Congress to serve. I have f e l t i t incumbent upon me to continue with the work u n til the^es sen tial requirements of the situ ation had beeh e f f e c t iv e ly met. That point now having been reached, I fe e l that I am ju s t ifie d in asking that you re lie v e me of iry duties as a Member of the Boabd and Barm Loan Commissioner in the near future, and I therefore tender my resignation to take e ffe c t on May 10, 1929, ,when I shall have completed two years of service in th is capacity. With a ll good wishes fob the success of your administration, I remain S incerely yours, EUGENE MEYER Earn Loan Commissioner. THE WHITE HOUSE Washington A p ril 29, 1929* Hon. Eugene Meyer Earn Loan Commissioner Federal Ea^1Loan Board Washington, D. C* My dear Meyer: I received your l e t t e r of A p ril 3rd in which you tender your resignation as Federal Barm Loan Commissioner and as a Member of the Federal Farm Loan Board. I intensely regret .that your decision is irrevocable and that, in the c i r cumstances, the duty devolves upon me to accept your resignation. I p a rtic u la rly wish to take th is opportunity to express the appreciation which a l l o f us hold fo r the work you have accomplished as Farm Loan Commissioner during the past two years. I know that you undertook the d i f f ic u lt task of reconstruction at a time when the Farm Loan System was confronted with a c r it ic a l situ ation and public confidence had been impaired. Under your leadersm p the v .r W f, V.' : ;' g : ■ -3 administration and supervision of the System has "been g re a tly strengthened this great in s titu tio n o f service to the farmers has been placed on a sounder "bas* s and public confidence has been m aterially improved, and w ill be of la s tin g bene f i t to the a gricu ltu ral in te résts o f the country. I am aware that a fte r ten years o f public service you u n w illin gly undertook this additional two years of service, and I can r e a liz e your desire ’to b e ’ relieved* I earnestly wish, however, that you could remain in public service where your high q u a lific a tio n s and sense of service so respond to public in terest. Yours fa it h fu lly , (Signed) Herbert Hoover. IKE SECRETARY OE THE TREASURY Washington May 1, 1929. Honorable Eugene Meyer, Farm Loan Commissioner, Treasury Department, Washington • Dear Mr. Meye rj. I t is with great regret that I learn that you are to leave the Treasury. For more than eight years I have been associated with you, f i r s t in the work of the War Finance Corporation and afterwards during your administration of the Federal Farm Loan Bureau. During th is time I have learned to re ly upon your judgment and to fe e l a sense o f security in your handling o f a ll the varied and d iff ic u lt problems connected with furnishing adequate cred it fo r a gricu ltu re. Under your d irectio n the War Finance Corporation was conducted in such a way that i t not only helped to re lie v e a serious cred it stringency which then existed in the agricu ltu ral community but i t also had a far-reaching e ffe c t i n ‘ helping the farmer to avoid the necessity of enforced liq u id a tio n of his .products, on a demoralized market. Later, when the necessity arose fo r reconstructing the Farm Loan Board and reorganizing the operation of the Farm Loan System, you again gave the Government the b en efit o f your experience and judgment. I know with what reluctance and. at what personal s a c r ific e you agreed to undertake this formidable task; and i t should be a source of the greatest sa tisfa ctio n to you to know that as a result of your e ffo r t s the System has been made to function in a more useful manner and has been m aterially strengthened in the confidence of the country. - 4 A ll o f those duties you have discharged in a way to merit the highest ap p rova l. I wish to take this opportunity not only to thank you fo r the services you have rendered hut to express also the pleasure which I have had during the years in which we have been associated together in the work o f the Treasury. With kind regards, I am Sincerely yours, (Signed) A. W. MELLON Secretary of the Treasury ' TREASURY DEPARTMENT For immediate release, May 10, 1929« The Secretary of the Treasury announced that fin a l steps were taken today fo r the settlement of the debt owed "by Greece to the United States and the d ifferen ces existin g between the two Governments a risin g out of the T r ip a rtite Loan Agreement o f February 10, 1918. Under the T r ip a rtite Loan Agreement the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval o f President Wilson, established on the books of the Treasury credits in fa vor o f Greece in the aggregate amount of $48,236,629, fo r which amount the United States held the obligation s o f Greece. Against these cred its the United States made cash advances of $15,000,000, leavin g a balance o f $33,236,629, which Greece has. • claimed the United States owed i t . The United States took the position that events which transpired subsequent to 1920 re lieved i t from making any fu rth er advances. This d ifferen ce of. opinion has h eretofore pre vented the reaching of an agreement fo r the settlement of the indebted ness of Greece to the United States. At it s la s t session, the Congress authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to make an agreement with Greece providing fo r the settlement o f Greece’ s indebtedness to the United States and fo r adjusting out standing differen ces as to the T rip a rtite Loan Agreement. This author iza tio n provided that Greece should fund i t s outstanding o b ligation s to the United States over a period of years and that the United States should make an additional loan to Greece in an amount which would make the to ta l of the sums advanced equal to the sums advanced by Great B rita in under the terms of the T rip a rtite Loan Agreement to which the United State Great B rita in and France were p a rties » OXhe terms o f the Agreement signed today on "behalf o f Greece by Charalambos Simopoulos, Envoy Extraordinary and M inister Plen ipoten tiary o f Greece, and on "behalf o f the United States b3r the Secretary of the Treasury, and approved by president Hoover, include the fo llo w in g: !• The amount owed by Greece to the United States as a resu lt o f the cash advances of $15,000,000 is to be refunded over a period o f S3 years. There are lis t e d below the payments to be made b>y the Greek Government to the United States under th is settlement: July Jan. July Jan. July Jan. July Jan. July Jan. July 1, 1, I, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, .......... ........ ............................................ ........................................................................ ......................................................................... ................................................. .......................................................................... ..................................................................... . .................................................................'........ ......................................................................... and semiannually th erea fter to Jan. 1, 1938, 10 payments each of July 1, 1938, and semiannually th erea fter to Jan. 1, 1990, 104 payments each of 2. 1928 1929 1929 1930 1930 1931 1931 1932 1932 1933 1933, $20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 110, 000 110,000 130,000 130,000 150,000 175,000 Greece is to forego a ll claims fo r fu rther advances under the T rip a rtite Loan Agreement o f February 10, 1918, which Agreement, so fa r as the United States and Greece are concerned, is to be regarded as terminated. 3. The United States w ill advance to Greece $12,157,000 at 4 per cent per annum with provisions fo r a sinking fund to r e t ir e the loan in twenty years. The service of this loan is to be administered by the International Financial Commission. 4. This newr loan by the United States to Greece is to be turned over in it s en tire ty to the Refugee Settlement Commission. The funda mental a r tic le s under which th is Commission functions provide that it s 3 Chairman shall always "be an American. This ilew loah by the United States will enable the Commission to continue its great humanitarian . l work of establishing in economically productive work in G-reece, approx* imately one million and a half Greek refugees driven from Asia Minor. In addition to the signing o f the Agreement, the Secretary o f the Treasury delivered to the Greek M inister canceled bonds of the Greek Government in the amount of $48,236,629*05 which had been d elivered to the United States under the T r ip a rtite Loan Agreement of February 10, 1918, and the Greek M inister d elivered to the Secretary o f the Troasurjr 124 bonds of the Greek Government in the aggregate amount o f $20,330,000, dated January 1, 1928, and maturing semiannually over a period o f 62 years, together with 40 bonds of the Greek Government in the aggregate amount o f $12,167,000 dated May 10, 1929, and maturing semiannually during the next 20 years and bearing in terest at the rate o f 4 per cent per annum to May 10, 1949* In addition the Greek Gove in ment paid in cash to the. United States the sum of $2,922.67 in order that the amount to be refunded should be an even number o f d o lla rs, together with $20,000 in payment of the bond issued under the Agreement and maturing July 1, 1928, and an additional $20,000 in payment of the bond maturing under the Agreement January 1, 1929« The Secretary of the Treasury d elivered to the Greek M inister a check on the Treasurer o f the United States fo r $12,167,000* The conclusion o f th is Agreement was authorized on the part of the United States by the Act of Congress approved February 14 , 1929, and on the part o f Greece by the Law o f January 27, 1928*. Of the debts owed the United States by fo reig n governments s e t t le ments remain to be concluded with Armenia, Austria, and Bussia. has already authorized the settlement of the Austrian debt# Congress J/ TREASURY1 DEPARTMENT FOR AFTERNOON PAPERS FRIDAY, MAY 17, 1929 Address of Honorable Henry Herrick Bond, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, at the meeting of the Missouri Bankers Association, Excelsior Springs, Missouri. May 17, 1929 f TH5 USïï QUWmCÏ ISSUE * ®ie P r iv ile g e of meeting with you at this convention of the Missouri Bankers Association is one that I assure you I deenly appreciate, as i t gives me the opportunity of presenting to you some of the p rin cip al pro ole ms connected with the issue of the reduced size currency. I ap precia te that with many of these problems you are, hy reason of your long experience as bankers, more fa m ilia r than I can pretend to have become in my limitent connection with the Treasury Department. However, i t is my hope that by presenting these problems from the viewpoint o f that De partment you w ill perhaps see them from a somewhat d iffe r e n t angle, and by showing you the d i f f ic u lt i e s that we have already faced and overcome, and the remaining d i f f ic u lt i e s that s t i l l confbont us, we may have your fu ll cooperation in the tra n sition a l period ?/hich we are now ranidly approaching. The i n i t i a l problem, was that 6f design. Pol* many shears the matter of revisin g the designs of the outstanding currency issues o f the Unitea States had been before the Department, but circumstances seemed always to preclude any general revision and the correction of the ex istin g confusion. Generally speaking, there was a d iffe re n t design fo r the face and back of each denomination of each kind. The m u ltip lic ity and duplication of ch a ra cteristic features was indescribable. For example, I have discovered eight or nine d iffe r e n t p o rtra its on the $5 b i l l s o f d iffe r e n t types or issues, and c erta in ly as many p o rtra its on currency o f tne $10 denomination. Of course, I do not mean to say that a ll these were found on the current issues, but the current issues were s u ffic ie n tly confusing. You w ill appreciate how th is situ ation favored cou n terfeiters and handicapped the Secret S ervice. The conclusion to reduce the size of the "bills made i t necessary to execute wholly new engraved stock fo r prin tin g the new currency, and th is gave the f i r s t re a lly favorable opportunity ever presented fo r the Department to make a complete revision of designs. Many months were devoted to the study, and fin a lly certain p rin cip les were arrived at and adopted, with the resu lt that the new designs are on a denominational basis, with emphasis on the d o lla r value rather than kind, and with the outstanding features inherently affo rd in g greater security. An e ff o r t has been made to keep the designs as simple as possible without unnecessary and confusing ornamentation. Dor the new designs every back of a given denomination w ill be absolutely id en tica l For example, take a fiv e d o lla r b i l l . The back w ill always bear an engraving of the Lincoln Memorial as a predominating featu re. The fiv e d o lla r backs w ill accordingly be printed in quantity and used fo r any kind o f currency issued in th is denomination. Accordingly there w ill be only one fiv e d o lla r back, instead o f several, fo r the Government to p rin t and p rotect, and fo r the public to become fa m ilia r with. For the faces, although necessary to show the kind of currency, uniform denomina tion al ch a ra cteristics have been fix e d , the outstanding feature of each denomination being a p o rtra it. Again taking our f iv e d o lla r b i l l , on the face side the p o rtra it of Lincoln w ill always appear in the center. As this feature is so prominent i t w ill take a somewhat careful examina tion to distinguish between the d iffe r e n t types u n til one is in itia te d into the points of d ifferen ce. There are d iffe re n t t i t l e s and - 3 ~ va ria tion s in texts, and as a fu rth er mark of d ifferen ce to catch the eye, the Treasury seals and s e ria l numbers w ill he printed in color, on United States notes in red, in blue fo r s ilv e r c e r t ific a t e s , in yellow fo r gold c e r t ific a te s , in green fo r Federal reserve notes, and in brown fo r national bank notes.- On United States currency the seal w ill be on the l e f t , balancing a large 11 F-I-V-E " at the righ t of the p o rtra it. On the Federal Reserve currency the seal w ill be superimposed on this y/ord F-I-V-E 11 at the righ t of the p o r tr a it, but w ill be balanced by the Federal Reserve D is tr ic t numeral at the l e f t * The seal w ill have the same place at the righ t on the Uation al bank currency, and at the l e f t of tne p o rtra it the name of the issuing bank w ill be prominently printed. These d ifferen ces of color and the p o sitio n of the seal are, we are con fid e n t, aiuj.lj s u ffic ie n t to f a c i l i t a t e the ready sortin g of currency by banking in s titu tio n s . G-old c e r t ific a t e s w ill no longer have the yellow back o f the past, but w ill be printed with a green back lik e other currency ana w ill nave the numbers and seal in yellow on the face. You w ill see, therefore, that we have succeeded in accomplishing a great sim p lific a t io n of currency designs, and we are confident that both by design and general plan we have made co u n terfeitin g and the raisin g o f the b i l l s from one denomination to another more d i f f ic u lt in the future. The denomination henceforth can always be to ld read ily by the p o r tr a it, which is the most d if f ic u lt thing to cou n terfeit successfully,and i f the nublic w ill learn the p o rtra its of the lower denominations they w ill be protected from tne raisin g o f currency, and from co u n terfcitin g in general, to a degree not possible in the past. 4 Having thus determined the problem o f design, which in i t s e l f was in some respects exceedingly d i f f i c u l t to work out, and having given d e fin ite approval to the models, the next step was the execution of the engraved stock. turn. F irs t the engraved dies had to be made and approved in From these, master r o lls were prepared and then in turn a s u ffic ie n t number of plates to supply hundreds of presses each with four -elates fo r p rin tin g. Our next problem was that of production. I t was necessary to prin t fo r a complete turnover of United States and Federal Reserve currency approximately 76,000,000 sheets of 12-subjects each, or 912,000,000 individual pieces* These have to go through the various operations of wetting* back p rin tin g, examining, a second wetting, face p rin tin g, examin ing, trimming, numbering and sealing, and the fin a l cutting in to individual notes. A fte r th is they are assembled into packages of 4000 pieces fo r d eliv ery to the Treasury. Vast as is the capacity of the Bureau to ac complish enormous tasks of this character, the production of th is new cur rency, ,in part ca rried on during a period of substantial production of the o ld -size currency to meet the needs of the past months, has strained the Bureau*s capacity to the utmost. However, th is work has progressed to a point where I can assure you that the currency w ill be ready fo r dis trib u tion upon the date contemplated in the Treasury announcements of la s t year, namely, in the early part of July of th is year. The exact date w ill be announced d e fin it e ly within the next few weeks. In order that this new currency might have a longer l i f e than that of the o ld -size currency, extensive research work was undertaken with the cooperation o f the Bureau o f Standards, the Bureau of E ffic ie n c y , and the - 5 - manufacturers of the paper, to develop a type of paP6r which would have a greater endurance and fo ld in g strength and which would at the same time meet the manufacturing requirements of the Bureau of Engraving and p rin t ing. I t is not every paper of high strength that w ill stand.the wetting and drying operations incident to the manufacture of currency. Our currency is printed by the in ta g lio process on dampened paper. Paper when moistened expands, hut does not always contract uniformly as i t dries. A second wetting is and the faces. necessary between the p rin tin g of the hacks We require th erefore a paper that w ill expand and con tract uniformly puder these conditions, in order that the faces on eachsheet o f twelve notes may re g is te r with reasonable accuracy against the backs previously printed. This is a somewhat severe requirement, when combined with a stipulated thickness, structure and fo ld in g strength. We have, however, developed a paper believed to be sa tisfa cto ry in a l l these respects and with such an increased strength that we are confident that the currency w ill have a longer l i f e . Further research w ill be undertaken to make th is paper i f p ossible more resistan t to d ir t and grease. contains Thenew paper has no prominent s ilk fib r e . Such fib r e as i t is somacerated and interwoven in the texture of the paper that it is not read ily observed. I t has long been f e l t that the prominent s ilk fib r e was an encouragement to the co u n terfeiter, since i t was so ea sily im itated. The determination of even an approximate issue date was in i t s e l f a d i f f ic u lt problem. I t had to be te n ta tiv e ly fixed before the engraving had been completed and at a time when certain new and essential machinery 6 was being designed and manufactured. I t had to be fix e d with due regard to the exhaustion of the ther.-existing stocks of the several kinds of currency, to avoid waste thereof, and the p rin tin g of o ld -size currency planned accordingly. In accordance with this plan the Bureau has de liv e r e d no new old-si'ze currency since the f i r s t of A p ril, and probably by th is date the e x is tin g stocks of new o ld -s ize currency in the Treasurer1s vaults and the Federal Reserve Banks, other than certain stocks of Rational bank currency and, I b e lie v e , Federal reserve notes, are p retty completely exhausted. This means that during the next few weeks the average standard of fitn e s s of currency in circu la tio n w ill be lowered, due to the absence of any considerable issues of new b i l l s . There is no way to avoid this unless we were to produce more o ld -size currency and this would mean an accumulation that might in part be not required, thus causing such unused stock to be s a c rific e d . In addition i t would require the re demption o f much' o ld -size currency while s t i l l in a f i t condition. The problem of d istrib u tio n is planned as fo llo w s : P r io r to the issue date, stocks of the new-size currency w ill be placed in reserve custody in the twelve Federal Reserve Banks and in certain o f th e ir branches. The i n i t i a l issue w ill be on a date not yet determined, but simultaneously to a ll banks. At th is time a ll established denomina tions from $1 to $20, in clu sive, o f a ll kinds of currency except Rational bank notes w ill be issued. The higher denominations of United States and Federal reserve currency and the established denominations o f Rational bank notes w ill fo llo w as soon as p ossib le. A ll issues w ill be through the Federal Reserve Brinks to member and other banks, and a ll banks w ill be placed on an equal fo o tin g . There are about 900,000,000 pieces o f paper currency outstanding. During the last fiscal year about 930,000,000 pieces of currency were redeemed and about 925,000,000 pieces of new cur rency were issued. Roughly speaking, the replacement of the old-size currency with the new small-size currency is .the equivalent of about one yearls ordinary redemptions and issues. Of course, it would not be possible to undertake the replacement of all outstanding old-size currency at one time, or in a fixed limited period. Nor would it be possible to undertake the replacement of all outstanding old-size currency on and after a given date as rapidly as it might, by chance, be presented. Essential safeguards are necessary in handling this retirement of the old which, in effect, is the basis for the issue of the new. Redemption is involved with certain legal and accounting restrictions and, of course, there are physical limitations both at the Eederal Reserve Banks and the Treasury. Therefore, instead of an immediate redemption of all out standing old-size currency it will be necessary for the issue to be made over a certain period of time. The Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks will do everything to make this period as short as possible. This means that at the very outset all banks applying for currency will be rationed, as it were, and each will be required to take a certain percentage of old-size currency assorted from that most fit for circula tion. This percentage of old currency vail be gradually decreased until after a period of a few months it is anticipated that all old-size currency presented at Federal Reserve Banks will be replaced in full with the reduced-size currency. I am referring now particularly to the United States currency and the Federal Reserve currency. (The issue of National "bank currency in reduced size I w ill r e fe r to s h o rtly .) Thus you w ill see that fo r a period of perhaps three or four months, at le a s t, both sizes of currenc3r w ill be in circu la tio n , but with the o ld -size currency gradually disappearing, and i t is estimated thht a ft e r several months the o ld -size currency w ill be rather a r a r ity and w ill only be in circu lation because i t has not reached a bank fo r a period of severa.l months. While i t w ill always be a v a lid ob ligation i t is safe to say that by the f i r s t of the year i t w ill not be in general c ircu la tio n and w ill be very ra rely seen. The problem of National bank currency in reduced size is a d is tin c t one and in certain ways more d i f f ic u lt o f solution than that o f United States or Federal reserve currency. When the Secretary of the Treasury determined, as was announced on January 22, 1929, that the bonds uoon which the National bank currency rests would not be ca lled fo r redemption in 1930, he simul taneously announced that th is currency would be issued in reduced size snortly a fte r tne other currency» Work was at once undertaken to prepare designs which would approximate as clo sely as possible in th eir essential features the designs fo r the other types of currency. completed, and the engraving is now almost accomolished. These have been The exact time and manner of d istrib u tio n are s t i l l under consideration. There are approximately 6300 issuing banks, and th e ir currency represents ap proximately 15 per cent of a ll outstanding currency in d o lla r value. pieces th is currency numbers about 70,000,000. In The p rin tin g o f this large amount, with the appropriate names o f the various banks on d iffe re n t denominations, is in i t s e l f an enormous task. I t has required, f i r s t - 9 - o f a l l , a careful v e r ific a t io n of the charter names, and the securing of fa csim ile signatures of the o ffic e r s who have in the past signed by pen or through overprinting with lo c a l prin ters* These signatures w ill now he printed on the h i l l at the same time that the t i t l e of the hank is printed. I t is our aim to plan a method of d istrib u tio n which w ill, as nearly as possible, give a ll national hanks a certa in amount of re duced-size currency fo r issue simultaneously, or as nearly simultaneously as p ossib le. There are problems connected with th is issue, and esp ecia lly in connection with the size of the 5 per cent redemption fund and the redemption procedure, which are very d i f f ic u lt of solution, hut I can assure you that i t is our aim to show no favoritism , e ith e r sectional or otherwise, in this d istrib u tio n , hut to accomplish the replacement as gen era lly and as rapidly as conditions w ill permit. However, i t is quite evident that th is kind of currency w ill require a longer period fo r it s complete replacement than the other types of currency requ ire, due to the problem of sorting and redemption, the size of the redemption fund, and other related matters, and therefore i t w ill he found in circu la tio n fo r a somewhat longer period than the other currency. I t is probable that i t w ill take at le a s t six or seven months to complete the turn-over of National bank currency, even under the most favorable conditions. We recognize that there w ill be at the beginning of the turn-over period a certain abnormal demand fo r the new currency, due to the natural c u rio s ity of the public to see the new designs in the reduced-size currency. We b e lie ve that the stocks which w ill be available and which can be issued >rA ^ - 10 - m ®|i w ill be s u ffic ie n t to meet this demand* I t should he noted, however, that there w ill he no d istrib u tio n of new currency in en tire sheets to the general public. You w ill see from the above that you, as bankers, have an inportant part in the program* I t is only through your cooperation that we can hope to accomplish this turn-over with a minimum of annoyance and disturbance in the currency. With your cooperation the p u b lic 's requirements fo r the new currency can be held within the lim its of our immediate a b ilit y to meet them* and the process of the turn-over thus made successful. Hot only must each bank be patien t in it s demands but we ask you to preach the doctrine o f patience to your customers. Sim ilarly the problem of the Federal Reserve Banks is one of coopera tion on the one hand with member banks and other banking in stitu tio n s, so as to meet th eir demands fo r currency as fu lly and rapidly as f a c i l i t i e s w ill permit, and on the other hand to cooperate with the Treasury so that these demands may be kept within the necessary lim ita tio n s which the Treasury must iirpose. I bespeak fo r them your syngpathetic cooperation in this d i f f ic u lt period. The national banking in s titu tio n presents a special problem, in tnat a ll banks are asked to keep in circu la tio n o ld -size National bank cur rency over a somewhat prolonged period of a number o f months, thus meeting fu lly the public requirement fo r currency. In return fo r th is coopera tion, on which we confiden tly re ly , I can assure the banks that the Treasury w ill make every endeavor not only to hasten production and issue of national bank currency in reduced size at the e a r lie s t possible date, hut also in s u ffic ie n t volume to accomplish i t s complete substitution fo r the o ld -size currency ju st as rapidly as the redemption f a c i l i t i e s w ill permit. In order that a l l of these problems may be successfully solved, the Treasury is planning certain p u b lic ity featu res. We regard i t as important that at the very outset of this turn-over period, - a period without precedent in the h istory of the country, - the public should be thoroughly acquainted with the essen tia l features o f the new currency, so that the passing o f cou n terfeits w i l l be impossible. To this end i t is planned to place on exh ib ition in a l l banking in s titu tio n s which desihe to p a rticip a te, specimen sets of the lower denominations, supplied at the face value purely fo r exh ib ition purposes in advance of the actual issue date. This advance d istrib u tio n of specimens w ill be s t r ic t ly lim ite d to banking in s titu tio n s . Fu ll d é ta ils as to th is d istrib u tio n of specimen sets w ill in due course be furnished by the Federal Reserve Barks in the respective d is t r ic ts through whom alone such d istrib u tio n w ill be made. This is one of several features of th is kind which the Department is planning to in a u g u ra te fo r the purpose of acquainting the public in advance with the essential features o f the new currency. In conclusion I appeal to the public fo r a sympathetic appreciation of the gig a n tic problems which have confronted the Treasury in this pro gram and fo r th eir cooperation during the turn-over period. I t is a period of great d iff ic u lt y such as has never before been faced in currency matters. I f the public w ill but re a liz e that the Treasury is making every endeavor to accomplish a complete tum -over as rapid ly as possible they w ill be content fo r a certain period oefore the actual - 12 - issue to accept the o ld -s ize currency in a condition of wear which would ord in a rily require it s redemption, knowing that th is is a. necessary incident of the program, and secondly, they w ill ch eerfu lly acquiesce to the necessity of using two sizes o f currency fo r a lim ited period, knowing that th ereafter the country w ill go forward with the reduced-size h i l l s y which w ill he fa r superior in heauty of design, sim p licity, p ro te c tiv e features, wearing q u a litie s , and general convenience. In addition there w ill he a very la rg e annual saving in cost of production, as roughly, we w ill p rin t twelve small notes fo r the cost of eight o ld -s iz e ; and at the same time avoid a large expansion of plant at the Bureau of Engraving and Printin g within the next few years which would otherwise have heen necessary* These ends are so high ly desirable that the temporal/ in convenience should not, and I am sure w ill not, he magnified and are certain in the end to he speedily fo rgotten . TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, FRIDAY, MAY 17, 1929. The corner stone fo r the new building of the Bureau of Internal Revenue at Twelfth and B Streets, Northwest, w ill be la id on Monday afternoon, May 20th, at 4*30 o’ clock. The exercises w ill be opened with an invocation by the Reverend Jason Noble Pierce, D*D., which w ill be follow ed by a few introductory remarks by the presiding o f fic e r , Honorable A. W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury'. A short address w ill be made by Honorable David H. B la ir, Commissioner o f Internal Revenue, which w ill be follow ed ~by the layin g of the com er stone by Secretary Mellon and Commissioner B la ir. The benediction w ill be pronounced by the Right Reverend C* F» Thomas. The United States Marine Band w ill play during the ceremony and o ffic e r s and men representing the United States Coast Guard w ill be present. a 7 FOE RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, TUESDAY, 10S3T 21, 1929, or when d elivered . TREASURY DEPARTMENT SPEECH OE HONORABLE A. W. MELLON* SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, AT THE LAY I EG- OF THE COREER STORE OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE BUILDING, TREASURY DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON MAY 20, 1923. / ïâ? ^ We have met th is afternoon to la y the corner stone of the new ouilding fo r the Bureau of Internal Revenue. I t is a sig n ific a n t occasion, fo r i t means that th is Bureau, with it s varied a c t iv it ie s and re s p o n s ib ilitie s fo r c o lle c tin g the vast revenues o f the Government,, w ill no longer he scattered in buildings throughout the c it y hut w ill he housed in a building adequate fo r it s needs* I t also means that the plans which have been made fo r the orderly development o f Washington, p a rtic u la rly as regards the so -ca lled Triangle Area, are at la s t under way. The present building is the f i r s t to be commenced in that grea^ group of Government buildings to be erected along Pennsylvania Avenue and the h all* i t w ill constitute an in tegra l part of that group; and i t has been designed in such a way that i t w ill contribute, in .the grea test measure p ossib le, to the beauty and d ig n it y o f the c it y and the convenience of a l l who must transact business with the Government. I t is a matter of special pride to us that the plans fo r this building have been made e n tir e ly within the Treasury i t s e l f . These plans have been drawn in the O ffic e of the Supervising A rch itect, which has been entrusted with such la rg e r e s p o n s ib ilitie s in working out the plans fo r the public building program in Washington* I t is a .p a rticu la r sa tis fa c tio n that th is long delayed bu ildin g fo r the Bureau of Internal Revenue has been started during the administration of the present Commissioner, Mr. B la ir. For more than eight years ne has carried on the d i f f i c u l t and responsible work of administering the in tern al revenue laws* Often i t has been under the greatest handicaps, such as inadequate housing o f the various units o f h is organization V - p. - and also constant changes in personnel. But he has worked always to g iv e the taxpayers and the Government an honest and e ffic ie n t administration o f the tax laws; and he has succeeded in making a record o f which the country can well he proud. I t is with great regret that we see him leave the Treasury organization; and I wish him to know that, in lea vin g, he ca rries with him the admiration o f a ll those who have been associated with him in the inportar.t work o f the la s t eight years. I take pleasure in introducing to you the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue, Honorable David H. B la ir, who w ill now address you. R E RELEASE JOR RELEASE MORNING PAPERS TREASURY $EFARTMENi 0 (nJVm-3, R? £ Û fTE Secretary Mellon today announced that July 10, 1929, has been sot fo r beginning the issue o f the new sm all-size currencjr. The issue w ill "be made through the Federal Reserve Ranks and Branches. For the in i t i a l issue, Federal Reserve Banks have been authorized to make a va ila b le, to the commercial banking in stitu tio n s o f th eir respective d is t r ic t s , 1 ted amounts o f new sm all-size currency, on an equitable basis established by them* Federal Reserve Banks w ill communicate with a ll banks and trust companies in th e ir respective d is t r ic ts giv in g f u l l instructions fo r •participation in the i n i t i a l d istrib u tio n o f the new currency. A fte r the in i t i a l issue of new sm all-size currency the procedure now in e f fe c t fo r supplying the paper currency requirements o f the country w ill, in general, be follow ed, and in making payments o f currency, the Treas urer o f the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks and Branches w ill pay out o ld -s iz e currency f i t fo r fu rther c ircu la tio n concurrently with new sm all-size currency. Replacement of the outstanding o ld -s iz e currency with the sm all-size currency accordingly w ill be a gradual process and, except fo r the i n i t i a l issue, w ill la r g e ly be governed . by the redemption o f o ld -s ize currency u n fit fo r fu rth er circ u la tio n . The f i r s t issues o f the new sm all-size currency w ill include a ll kinds except National bank notes, and a ll denominations from $1 to $2 0 . Sm all-size gold c e r t ific a t e s and Federal reserve notes in denominations .above $20 w ill be issued at a la t e r date. Sm all-size National bank notes w ill be printed and issued in order o f charter numbers beginning about July 15, 1929 )X 2 - 2 - For the reduced-size currency wholly new designs on a denominational basis have been adouted. The revision of designs w ill elim inate e x is t ing confusion, and w ill furnish a new and more e ffe c t iv e protection to the currency issues of the United States against co u n terfeitin g and fraudulent a lte ra tio n s . G-enerally speaking, the designs have been sim p lified , and, as ju st indicated, there is a c h a ra cteris tic design fo r each denomination. Treasury Department Circular UP. 415, dated June 3, 1929, w ill govern the issue o f the sm all-size currency. Ho issues o f the new currency w ill be made to the public before July 10, 1929. Specimens o f the new currency in unseparated sheets w ill not be a va ila b le. Any outstanding o ld -s iz e paper currency, h eretofore or h erea fter issued, w ill not be re ca lled ; i t w ill be r e tir e d gradually in regular course o f business, and in the meantime i t s v a lid it y w i l l not be a ffec te d by the issue o f the new sm all-size currency. The Treasury appreciates that during the period when the two sizes o f currency are in circu la tio n th is w ill be a matter of some inconven ience to the general pu blic. However, i t is b elieved that the Department may confiden tly ask fo r th e ir indulgence and cooperation in view o f the ultim ate advantages to be gained. Accompanying th is statement w ill be found: 1. A description o f the essen tial c h a ra cteris tic s of the designs o f the sm all-size currency. 2. A copy o f Treasury Department Circular Ho. 415, dated June 3, 1929, governing the issue of the sm all-size currency. HEDUCED-SIZE CURRENCY Description The new size fo r the paper currency is 5-5/16 x 2-11/1S inches. The p rin c ip le o f denominational designs has "been s t r ic t ly follow ed. The hack designs are uniform fo r each denomination irre s p e c tiv e of kind. The face designs, lik ew ise, are ch a ra cteris tic fo r each denomination as regards the important p ro tective featu res, with only s u ffic ie n t va ria tio n in de t a i l to indicate the kind. Five kinds o f paper currency are now issued - United States notes, s ilv e r c e r t ific a t e s , gold c e r t ific a t e s , Federal re serve notes, and National hank notes. The new designs w ill he applied to a ll issuahle denominations of a l l these kinds. The p o rtra its assigned to the faces, and the embellishments provided fo r the hacks, o f the several denominations, are as fo llo w s: Denomination $1 $2 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 $500 $ 1 , 000 $5 , 0 0 0 $1 0 , 0 0 0 P o rtra it on face Emhell i shment on hack Washington J efferson Lincoln Hamilton Jackson Grant Franklin McKinley Cleveland Madison Chase Ornate ONE M onticello Lincoln Memorial U*S.Treasury White House U. S.Capitol Independence H all Ornate FIVE HUNDRED Ornate QNE THOUSAND Ornate FIVE THOUSAND Ornate TEN THOUSAND The backs o f the new currency w ill he printed uniformly in green; the faces w ill he printed in black, and the Treasury seals and the s e ria l numbers w ill be imprinted in the fo llow in g colors; S ilv e r c e r t ific a t e s .................Blue United States n otes........... ....B e d Gold c e r t ific a t e s ......................Yellow Federal reserve notes...............Green National bank notes......... .....B row n For the reduced-size currency a new type o f d is tin c tiv e paper has been adopted. The paper b a s ic a lly is o f the type developed during the past few years with a higher fo ld in g endurance, p a rtic u la rly in the cross d irectio n , than the paper form erly in use. The use o f small seg ments o f s ilk fib e r as a d is tin c tiv e feature has been retained, but the segments are scattered throughout the sheet and not lo c a liz e d in rows as form erly. The reason fo r the change is that, as a te s t o f genuniness, dependence may not be placed on an outstanding ch a ra c te ris tic , which, in i t s e l f , inherently a fford s no protection . I SSUE OF NEW SMALL-SIZE CURRENCY 1929 Department Circular. No. 415, .Supplementing Department Circular No. 55, as revised January 26, 1927. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, Washington, June 3, 1929. Treasurer o f the United States The Secretary o f the Treasury has h eretofore announced the adop tio n o f a reduced size, and wholly new designs, fo r the paper currency issues of the United States. The date July 10, 1929, is now set fo r the i n i t i a l issue of new sm all-size currency, and th erea fter o ld -s ize currency, redeemed as u n fit fo r further circu la tio n , w i l l be replaced with new sm all-size currency* The issue w ill be made through the Federal Reserve Banks and Branches. For the i n i t i a l issue, the Federal Reserve Banks have been authorized to make a va ila b le, to the commercial banking in s titu tions o f th e ir respective d is t r ic t s , lim ited amounts o f new smallsize currency, on an equitable basis established by them. A fte r such i n i t i a l issue, in making payments o f currency, the Treasurer, o f the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks and Branches w ill fo llo w the usual procedure, and w i l l pay out ava ila b le o ld -s iz e currency f i t fo r fu rth er circ u la tio n concurrently with new sm all-size currency, in such proportion of each as may from time to time be determined. The i n i t i a l issue w ill include a l l kinds of currency except National bank notes, and a l l denominations from $1 to $20, Small- size gold c e r t ific a te s and Federal reserve notes in denominations ~ f - above $20 w ill be issued when ava ila b le without further n otice. Small- size National bank notes w ill be prin ted fo r issuing banks in order of charter numbers, and, commencing about July 15, 1929, w ill be issued accordingly, as a va ila b le, against redemptions of o ld -size bank notes. Any outstanding o ld -s iz e paper currency, h eretofore or h erea fter issued, w ill not be re c a lle d . I t w ill be r e tir e d gradually in regular course o f business, and in the meantime it s v a lid it y w ill not be a f fe c te d by the issue o f the new sm all-size currency. A. W. MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury. E R RELEASE, M' RUING PAPERS, Friday, June 7, 1929, TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe rin g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, an issue o f nine month 5-l/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1930, dated and hearing in te re s t from June 1.5, 1929, and maturing March 15, 1930. The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $400,000,000, or there abouts. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness of Series TJ-1929, maturing June 15, 1929. Subscriptions fo r which payment is to be tendered in c e r t i fic a te s of indebtedness maturing June 15, 1929, w i l l be a llo t t e d in fu ll up to the amount o f the o ffe r in g . Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in te re s t coupons attached payable September 15, 1929, and March 15, 1930. About $500,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness and nearly $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 in in te rest payments on the public debt, become due and payable on June 15, 1929. The present o ffe r in g , with tax and other receip ts, is expected to cover the Treasury’ s cash requirements u n til September. The text of the o f f i c i a l circu la r follows? ~2~ The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the authority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te rest, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1930, dated and bearing in tere st from June 15, 1929, payable March 15, 1930, with in te re s t at the rate of f i v e and one-eighth per cent per annuo, payable on a semi annual basis, . Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks, Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a t e s w i l l have two in te rest coupons attached, payable September 15, 1929, and March 15, 1930. The c e r t ific a t e s o f said series sh all be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, from a l l taxation now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, or by any lo c a l taxing au th ority, except (a ) estate or inheri tance taxes, and (b) graduated additional income taxes, commonly known as surtaxes, and excess-p rofits and w a r-p rofits taxes, now or h ereafter imposed by the United States, upon the income or p r o fit s of individuals, partnerships, association s, or corporations* The in terest on an amount o f bonds and c e r t ific a t e s authorized by said Act approved Sep tember 24, 1917, and amendments thereto, the p rin cip a l o f which does not exceed in the aggregate $5 , 0 0 0 , owned by any in dividu al, partnership, -3 - association , or corporation, sh all he exempt from the taxes provided fo r in clause (b ) above. The c e r t ific a t e s o f th is series w i l l he accepted a t par during such time and under such rules and regulations as shall he prescribed or approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity of the c e r t ific a t e s . The c e r t i fic a te s o f th is series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public ’l ' l ■ ' *' J ■■■: moneys, but w i l l not bear the circu la tio n p r iv ile g e . The rig h t is reserved to r e je c t any subscription and to a l l o t le s s than the amount o f c e r t ific a t e s applied fo r and to close the sub scription s at any time without n otice. The Secretary o f the Treasury also reserves the right to make allotment in f u l l upon applications fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotments upon, or to r e je c t, appli cations fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotm ents and a llo t ments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l be fin a l. Allotment notices w i l l be sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotment w i l l be p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in te re s t fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d must be made on or before June 15, 1929, or on la te r allotm ent. A fte r allotm ent and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue interim re ceip ts pending d eliv ery of the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l be permitted to make payment by cred it fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo t t e d to i t fo r i t s e l f and i t s customers up to any amount fo r which i t shall be q u a lifie d in excess of e x is tin g deposits, when so n o tifie d /*/ - ¿Ir by the Federal Reserve Bank o f i t s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness of Series TJ-1929, maturing June 15, 1929, w i l l be accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s of the series now o ffe re d which sh all be subscribed fo r and a llo t t e d , with an adjustment o f the in te rest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r. As f is c a l agents of the. United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make a l l o t ments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is t r ic ts . TlSASUlir DEPADTHSFT JOS, IM?*3DIAT3 rJULHASE, Monday, June 10,. 1929, Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of 5-1/8 per cent Treasury C e rtific a te s c f Indebtedness, Series T iM ^ O , dated June 15, 1929, maturing March 15, 1930, fr ill close at the c l dee of business today, Monday, June 10, 1929* Subscriptions which f a i l to reach a Federal tie serve Bank or branch* or the Treasury Department, before the close o f business today f r i ll not be accepted* The p ractice of accepting mail subscriptions received on the morning fo llo w in g the clo sin g o f the bocks w ill not be observed frith regard tc the current offering-. TirsAstczr uepabt'^ ft POP TSLEASJ3, ,TOhFIFG PAFEBS, Wednesday, June 12, 192$. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness^ dated June 15, 192S, Series TM-1930, 51/8 per cent, maturing March 15, 1930, closed at the close of business on June 10, 1929. The re-norts received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe rin g , which was fo r $400,000,000, or thereabouts, to ta l sub scription s aggregate some $1,118,000,000. As previously announced, sub scription s in payment o f which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of Indebtedness of Series TJ-1S29, maturing June 15, 1929, were tendered, were a llo t t e d in fu ll. Upon these exchange subscriptions about $87,000,000 have been a llo tte d * Allotments on cash subscriptions were made as fo llow s: Subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $1,000 were a llo tte d in f u l l ; sub scription s in amounts over $1 , 0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 0 , 0 0 0 were a llo tte d 70 per cent, but not less than $1,000 on any pne subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 0 , 0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 were a llo tte d 50 per cent, but not less than $7,000 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 were a llo tte d 30 per cent, but not le s s than $50,000 on any one subscription; and subscriptions in amounts over $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 were a llo tte d subscription. 20 per cent, but not le s s than $300,000 on any one 1 Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments w ill be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Be serve Banks. FOP IMMEDIATE DELEASE, Friday, June 14, 1329• TREASURY DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon today announced that the to ta l amount o f sub scription s received fo r the issue o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebted ness, Series TM-1930, 5 l / 8 per cent, dated June 15, 1929, maturing March 15, 1930, was $1,118,862,000. The to ta l amount of subscriptions a llo t t e d was $404,212,000, of which $86,985,500 represents allotm ents on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1929, were tendered in payment. A ll o f such exchange sub scription s wore a llo tte d in f u l l , while allotments on other subscriptions wore made on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotm ents were divided among the several Federal Deserve D is tr ic ts and the Treasury as fo llo w s: Federal Deserve D is tr ic t : Total Subscriptions Deceived: Total Subscriptions A llo t t e d : Boston Dew York Ph iladelph ia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ 53", 86'9‘, 500 346,166,000 110.681.500 75.331.500 38.964.000 57.236.500 114.819.500 39.054.500 18.121.000 30.659.500 49.849.500 182.469.500 1,639,500 $ 22,643,000 90.289.000 37.300.000 33.110.500 19,232-, 000 23.056.000 62.201.000 19.641.500 10.441.000 18.097.000 20.464.000 46.243.000 1.494,000 $1,118,862,000 $404,212,000 Total J T3SASUSY - nEBATiTî.ÎEïïT EO?l IMMEDIATS RELEASE.« June 15, 1929. The Treasury today received payments amounting to $80,109,385*95 from the fo llow in g fo re ig n governments on account of th e ir indebtedness to the United States, of which $78,567,000 was in United States 3 Treasury notes, accrued in terest thereon o f $683,509.76, and $858,876.19 in cash* UHEAT 3 PJTAIU: The thirteen th semi-annual payment o f in terest on the funded indebtedness o f Great B rita in to the United States under the terns o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of. February 28, 1923. The to ta l payment amounted to $ 6 6 , 7 9 5 , 0 0 0 , and as authorized by the terms of the settlement, was made in obligation s o f the United States which were accepted at par and accrued in terest with a small cash adjustment. The o b ligation s were $66,215,600 face amount o f 3Itfo Treasury notes, Series "A” 1930-32, the ac crued in terest being $579,386.50, and the cash adjustment $13.50. ITALY: The fourth annual installm ent of p rin cip al on the funded indebtedness o f It a ly to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement ap proved by the Act o f A p ril 28, 1926. The to ta l payment amounted to $5,000,000, and as authorized by the terms o f the settlement was made in ob liga tion s o f the United' States which wore accepted at par and accrued in te re s t. lig a tio n s were $1,500,000 face amount of The ob Treasury notes, Series uArt 1930-32, $3,456,600 face amount o f 3|$ Treasury notes, Series «B" 1930-32, the accrued in terest being $43,370.25 and the cash adjustment $29.75. - BELGIUM: 2 - The eighth semi-annual payment c f in te rest and the fourth in s t a ll ment of p rin cip al on the funded indebtedness of the Government of Belgium to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. The to ta l payment amounted to $4,200,000, and, as author ized by the terms cf the settlement, was made in obligation s o f the United States, which were accepted at oar and accrued in terest with a small cash adjustment. The obligation s were $500,000 face amount o f 3 | T r e a s u ry notes, Series "A” 1930-32, $1,970,000 face amount of 3-|$ Treasury notes, Series "B11 1930-32, and $1,679,000 face amount o f 3|$ Treasury notes, Scries ,,C*t 1930-32, the accrued in terest being $50,995 and the cash adjustment $5.00. $1,250,000 was fo r in terest and $1 , 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 fo r prin cip al on the post-arm istice debt, and $1,750,000 fo r p rin cip al on the pre-arm istice debt. CZECHOSLOVAKIA: The eighth semi-annual installm ent o f prin cip al on the funded indebtedness o f the Government of Czechoslovakia to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f May 3, 1926. The payment amounted to $1,500,000, and, as authorized by the terms c f the settlement was made in obliga tion s o f the United States, which were accepted at par. and accrued in te rest with a small cash adjustment. were $495,650 face amount o f 3 $1,000,000 face amount of 3 The obligation s Treasury notes, Series "B” 1930-32, Treasury notes, Series UC", 1930-32, the ac crued in terest being $4,336.94 and the cash adjustment, $13.06. BSTOrTIA: The seventh semi-annual payment on account of the funded indebted ness o f the Government of> Estonia to the United States under the terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. The payment 3 amounted te $125,000, and, as authorized by the terms o f the settlement, wg.s made in obligation s of the United States, which were accented at par and accrued in te re s t. The obliga tion s were $123,900 face amount o f 3-r$ Treasury notes, Series "B", 1930-32, the accrued in terest being $1,084,13 and the cash adjustment $15.87, The balance w ill be funded in accordance with the option given the Government o f Estonia in the debt settlement agreement. FBILAUD: The thirteenth semi-annual payment o f in terest on the funded in debtedness o f the Government o f Finland to the United States under tnc terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act o f March 12, 1924. The to ta l payment amounted to $130,680, and, as authorized by the terms o f the s e t t le ment, was made in obligation s o f the United States which were accepted at par. .The obligation s were $130,600 face amount o f 3^$ Treasury notes, , Series "Cu, 1930-32, the cash adjustment being $80. HUITGAliY: The eleventh semi-annual payment o f in te re s t on the funded indebted ness o f the Government of Hungary to the United States under the terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act o f May 23, 1924. The to ta l payment amounted to $28,973.40, which was made in cash. LATVIA; The seventh semi-annual payment on account of the funded indebted ness o f the Government o f L a tvia to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. to $45,000, and was made in cash. The payment amounted The balance w ill be funded in accordance with the option given the Government of L a tvia in the debt settlement agree ment. - 4 - LITHUANIA: The tenth send-annual payment of in te re s t, except that part to ' he funded, and the f i f t h annual installment o f p rin cip a l on the funded in debtedness o f the Government o f Lithuania to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f December 22, 1924. The to ta l payment amounted to $84,732.55, o f which $49,634.55 was fo r in terest and $35,098 fo r p rin cip a l. The payment was made, in cash. The balance of the in terest amounting to $44,302.50 w ill be funded in accordance with the option given the Government o f Lithuania in the debt settlement agreement. POLAND: The ninth semi-annual -oaymont on account o f the funded indebtedness o f the Government o f Poland to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f December 22, 1924. The payment amounted to $1,500,000 and as authorized by the terms o f the settlement, was made in ob lig a tio n s o f the United States which were accepted at par and accrued in te re s t. The obligation s were $495,650 face amount o f Treasury notes, Series "B", 1930-32, $1,000,000 face amount o f 3j$ Treasury notes, Series "C \ 1930-32, the accrued in te re s t being $4,336.94, and the cash ao.justroent $13*06. The balance due w ill be funded in accordance with the option given the Government o f Poland in the debt settlement agreement. RUMANIA: The fourth annual installm ent o f p rin cip a l on the funa.ed indebted ness o f the Government o f Rumania to the United States under the terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act of May 3, 1926. ing to $500,000 was made in cash* The payment amount 5 YUGOSLAVIA: The fourth annual installm ent of prin cip al on the funded in debtedness of the Government of Yugoslavia (Serbs, Croats and Slovenes) to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of llarch 30, IS 28. The payment amounting to $200,000 7/as made in cash. - oOo - The bbligation s of the United States accepted in connection with the payments have been cancelled and re tire d and the public debt reduced ac cordingly. TREASURY DEPARTMENT POE IMMEDIATE RELEASE, June 27, 1929, The fo llow in g le t t e r s were made public today: THE WHITE HOUSE Washington June 8 , 1929* Hon. Carl T. Schuneman, Assistant Secretary o f the Treasury, Washington, D. C. My dear Mr. Schuneman» I have before me your renewed resignation as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. I regret that you fe e l i t necessary to terminate your service with the Government, but in accepting your resignation I ¥/ish to express to you ny appreciation fo r the high degree of public service you have given. Yours fa it h fu lly , HERBERT HOOVER ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY Washington June 26, 1929. My dear Mr. Mellon: I t is with deep regret that I fin d i t necessary to resign my position as one of your assistan ts. The opportunity to serve and be associated with you in the great work that you have accomplished in the Treasury Department has been a rare p r iv ile g e , fo r which I w ill always be duly g r a te fu l. With ny deep appreciation o f your thoughtfulness toward me, I an, Yours sin cerely, CARL T. SCHUUEMAU Hon. A. W. Mellon, Secretary o f the Treasury, Washington, D. C. TSE SECKETAIiY OF THE TH3ASU2X Washington June 26, 1929* Dear Hr. Schuneman: I have received your l e t t e r of June 26th tendering your resignation as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and i t is with great regret that I accept i t . Several months ago, v/hen you made known your desire to return to p riva te l i f e , I asked you to continue in your present p o s itio n u n til certa in matters with which you had been s p e c ia lly charged in connection with the public building program should be completed. You agreed to do so; and now, as I know, these matters are in such shape that you fe e l fre e to lea ve. The en tire public building program has b en efited by the care and thought which you have devoted to i t , and i t should always be a sa tis fa c tio n to you to know that you have played such an important loart in the i n i t i a l stages of an undertaking o f great and permanent value to the country. In addition to th is , you have been e ff ic ie n t and lo y a l in discharging a ll the duties entrusted to you, and i t is with a fe e lin g of personal re gret that I see you leave the Treasury organization. With best wishes, I am S incerely yours, A. W. MELLON Secretary of the Treasury. Hon. Carl T. Schuneman, Assistant Secretary o f the Treasury. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, MONDAT, JULY 1, 1929. Secretary Mellon made the fo llow in g announcement in connection with the close of the fis c a l year o f the Government on June 30th; The Government closed the f i s c a l year with i t s finances in a h igh ly sa tisfa cto ry sta te. Receipts again exceeded expenditures hy a substantial amount-, while our national debt shows a reduction over the 12 months period ju st closed o f approximately $673,000,000 as compared with one of $907,000,000 in 1928. For the f i r s t time since the war, our national debt is now „below $17,000,000,000. The to ta l ordinary receipts amounted to $4,033,000,000 as com pared with $4,042,000,000 in the fis c a l year 1928. The expenditures chargeable against such receip ts were $3,848,000,000 as compared with $3,644,000,000 in 1928. The surplus amounted to $185,000,000 as compared with a surplus o f $398,000,000 in 1928. RECEIPTS The aggregate o f tax receip ts, that is , customs, income tax, and miscellaneous internal revenue receip ts, was $3,540,000,000 or $176,000,000 more than receip ts from these sources in 1928. / - 2 - Income tax receip ts aggregated $2,33^*000,000 as against $2,17^,000,000 in 192S, or an increase o f $156,000,000- The receip ts from the current corporation income tax were somewhat lower than during the previous fis c a l year owing to a reduction in the corporation income tax rate from 13^ to 12$, hut p r a c tic a lly a l l o f the loss occasioned by the reduced rate was made up by increased income reported by corporations, due to increased prosperity* Back tax c o llectio n s lik e wise showed a f a llin g o f f , somewhat greater than was anticipated. On the other hand, there was a remarkable increase amounting to about $220,000,000 in receip ts from the current individu al income tax. U ntil the returns have been analyzed, i t is impossible to assign d e fin ite reasons fo r th is abnormal increase, but, gen era lly speaking, i t was unquestionably due to wide-spread p rosp erity, the cumulative resu lts o f the reduction o f surtax rates to a more reasonable point, and more s p e c ific a lly to increased income re a liz e d on the sale o f c a p ita l assets due, in the main, to an exceedingly a c tiv e and constantly ris in g security market. The Treasury *s estimates o f receip ts from the corporation tax and from back taxes were reasonably accurate. Owing to the unprecedented conditions above described, which i t was impossible to forecast with \ certa in ty, the receip ts from in dividu al income taxes were considerably under-estimated. Customs duties, including the tonnage tax, y ie ld ed $602,000,000 as compared with $569,000,000 in 192S, and the Treasury estimate o f $522,000,000. The increase is accounted fo r, in large measure^ by the impending change in our t a r i f f ra tes, experience having shown that imports tend to increase p r io r to t a r i f f le g is la tio n . J7i - 3 Miscellaneous in tern al revenue receip ts were $607*000,000 a fa llin g o f f o f $14,000,000 from the 192S $29,000,000 over the Treasury estimates. fig u re s , hut an increase o f The f a llin g o f f in revenue is due, in the main, *to a loss o f about $45,000,000 resu ltin g from the repeal o f the excise tax on the sale o f automobiles and o f about $1 2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 owing to increased exemptions applicable to the so -ca lled loss amusement tax, a to ta l/ o f some .$5 7 * 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , which, however, was almost e n tire ly made up by increases o f about $40,000,000 from the tobacco t a x ,' and about $lb,000,000 from stamp taxes. The estate tax y ie ld e d about the same amount as the previous year, namely $60,000,000. The d ifferen ce between the actual miscellaneous Internal Revenue receipts and the receip ts as estimated by the Treasury is accounted fo r p r in c ip a lly by !IJ” two items - $1 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 increase o f estate tax receip ts over estimates, and $14,000,000 increase in stamp tax c o lle c tio n s , due o f course to the unforeseeable and unusual a c t iv it y in secu rity markets. , The most s ig n ific a n t changes to be noted in 1929 aw compared with 192S in so fa r as receip ts are concerned is the almost complete d is appearance o f the large revenue derived up to the present time from the sale o f government-owned ca p ita l assets, continued downward trend in back tax co lle c tio n s , the loss in revenue occasioned by the repeal o f the automobile tax, the m odification o f the admissions tax, and the reduction of the corporation tax rate; and, on the other hand, the unusual increase in receipts from the in dividu al income tax, the record breaking receip ts from the tobacco tax, and the unusually la rge y ie ld o f the stamp tax* 4 EXPENDITURES. Total expenditures chargeable against ordinary receipts amounted to $3,848,000,000 as compared with $3,644,000,000 in 1928, or an in crease -of $204,000,000, the p rin cip a l items o f increase consisting o f increased postal expenditures o f $105,000,000 payable from the Treasury, t of which $52,000,000 were fo r compensation to railroads fo r mail trans portation as a resu lt of a recent Supreme Court decision, o f increased internal revenue refunds of $42,600,000, o f increased naval expendi tures o f $30,000,000, of flo o d control and other expenditures connected with flo o d r e l i e f o f $30,000,000, o f the f i r s t governmental c o n tr i butions to the C iv il Service Retirement Fund of $20,000,000, of $16,000,.000 increased Veterans Bureau expenditures,of increased public bu ilding expenditures and o f increased compensation to government employees. The p rin cip al items o ffs e ttin g these increases are $50,000,000 fo r war claims paid in 1928, and a decrease in in te rest paid o f $54,000,000. Expenditures as compared with the Budget estimate show an in crease of $54,000,000. Though there are a number o f decreases and in creases in the expenditures o f the various departments which to a large extent o ffs e t each other, th is is accounted fo r p r in c ip a lly by three items - $52,000,000 paid to the ra ilroad s on account of back mail pay as the resu lt o f the decision o f the Supreme Court, an in crease of some $39,000,000 in internal revenue refunds, and a $12,000,000 loan to the Greek Government, or a to ta l of $103,000,000. This increased amount was p a r t ia lly o ffs e t by reduced expenditures of some $49,000,000. - 5 - SURPLUS The surplus amounted to $185,000,OCX), as compared with the surplus as estimated in the Budget of $37,000,000« $124,000,000 o f th is surplus has already “been applied to the retirement of public debt ob liga tion s, and the balance, which has temporarily been ca rried as an increase in the net balance in the general fund at the close o f the year over the balance at the beginning, w ill be applied to debt retirement e a rly in the fis c a l year 1930« THE FUELIC DEBT The to ta l gross debt at the close of the fis c a l year amounted to $15,931,000,000 as compared with $17,604,000,000 at the close o f the fis c a l year 1928, or a decrease o f $673,000,000« Of the amount re tire d , $549,000,000 is to be a ttribu ted to the sinking fund and other debt re tirements chargeable against ordinary receip ts, and $124,000,000 to debt retirement from the surplus of receip ts over expenditures. The annual rate o f in te rest on the in terest-bearin g debt on June 30, 1929, was 3,94$, as compared with 3,87$ at the close o f the fis c a l year 1928« This slig h t increase is due to the high coupon rate ca rried by short-term secu rities issued during the course of the la s t s ix months, in which period tightening c red it conditions compelled the G-overaiment, as w ell as other borrowers,- to pay higher rates fo r money, ■ Total in terest payments in the fis c a l year 1929 were $678,000,000, as compared with $732,000,000 in 1928, or a saving in in terest charges o f $54,000,000. TREASURY DEPARTMENT. POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, MONDAY, July 1, .1929. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON My atten tion has "been c a lle d to various statements appearing in the public press to the e ffe c t that Assistant Secretary o f the Treasury Lowman and Commissioner Doran contemplate resign ing at an ea rly date. There is no truth in these reports, and there are no fa c ts to ju s t ify the circ u la tio n o f rumors o f this character, which do an in ju s tic e to two gentlemen who are performing a d i f f i c u l t task with a high degree o f a b ilit y and devotion, and who have in f u l l measure my confidence and support. /? u n TREASURY DEPARTMENT imM-" nE l EAS EOJi flELEAbE, M0JHTI1TG- PAPEBS, Sunday, July 7, 1929. "THE NEW SMALL-SIZE CURRENCY" Speech to he d eliv ered over the radio by Hon. Ogden L. M ills , Undersecretary o f the Treasury, through Station WABC, New York C ity, and a chain o f stations of the Columbia Broadcasting Company on Saturday evening, July 6 , 1929, at 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (10:00 p.m*, Eastern D aylight Saving Time) On July 10th, that is , next Wednesday, the United States Government w ill begin the issue o f new paper currency o f reduced size and improved design* Our paper currency nas been issued in i t s present size since 1861 and this step, therefore, is an important one which is bound to arouse widespread in te rest* For a few days we w i l l look with surprise at these new, to ns, strange looking b i l l s and then, in the course o f a few weeks, we w ill wonder why, fo r so many years, we accommodated our selves so re a d ily to th eir la rg e r and more unwieldy brothers. You w i l l ask ,cf course, what were the reasons which led the Govern ment a ft e r so many years, to make th is change* A fte r an exhaustive study and in vestiga tio n covering a number o f years the Treasury concluded that i t was possible to give the public paper money o f more convenient size, o f longer l i f e and b e tte r q u ality, and o f improved design with greater p rotection against co u n terfeitin g . The Treasury Department decided that the convenience of the public warranted this reform, while from the standpoint o f the Government the proposed reduction in s ize w ill create substantial savings in the expense o f manufacturing as w ell as in the cost o f handling the currency* From the time the paper is d elivered by the m ill u n til the notes are put into c ircu la tio n an estimated gross saving amounting to almost $1,500,000 a year w i l l be derived from the change in size* Each note w ill require one-third less paper and ink; it s shipping weight w i l l be reduced by one-third, and 50 per cent more notes w i l l be produced by the same operation. An addition al saving, the amount of which cannot be d e fin it e ly estimated, w i l l undoubtedly be accomplished as a resu lt o f the expected increase in the l i f e o f the smaller note as compared with I - 2 ~ that r f tho la rg e r one, due to the fa c t that they w ill be subjected to less creasing and fo ld in g . The normal increase in the population and wealth o f th is country n ecessarily resu lts in a constantly increasing demand fo r currency. This is w ell illu s tr a te d by the fo llo w in g fig u re s : In 1917 the Bureau of Engraving and P rin tin g d eliv ered 128,672,045 sheets of currency; in 1920, 163,860,748 sheets; in 1923, 171,955.335 sheets; in 1926, 227,566,949 sheets, and, in 1928, 236,565,232 sheets. The bu ildin g now occupied by the Bureau o f Engraving and P rin tin g was completed in 1914, and at the time of it s erection i t was contemplated that th is bu ildin g would be adequate to meet the Bureaurs requirements fo r an extended period. I t appears, how ever, that within a comparatively shosrt time the normal increase in the demand fo r currency would, were i t not fo r the contemplated change, fo rce the Bureau to obtain additional manufacturing equipment and b u ild a large extension to the present p la n t. The introduction of the new s ize currency w ill solve the production d i f f i c u l t i e s o f the Bureau fo r the reason that the reduced size w i l l permit the production o f twelve subjects to the sheet instead o f eigh t, resu ltin g in an increased production of 50 per cent more notes fo r each p rin tin g operation. The reduced s iz e w i l l also have an important e ffe c t upon the a va ila b le vault space, both in the Treasury and the Eederal Reserve Banks. The present s ize of the currency is 7 7/16 by 3 1/8 inches. s iz e is 6 5/16 by 2 11/16 inches. The new I r e a liz e , o f course, that a description o f size given in terms o f 1/16 o f an inch does not convey very much over the radio, but I think you w i l l be pleasan tly surprised next Wednesday when you see the new b i l l s and r e a liz e how great is the improvement in ap pearance and in convenience from the standpoint o f handling. - s I have mentioned improved appearance* For many years the matter o f re visin g the designs of the outstanding currency issues o f the United States has been before the Department, hut there was never an opportunity to undertake a general re visio n u n til the decision to revise the size of the h i l l s made i t necessary to execute wholly new engraved stock fo r p rin tin g the new currency* Generally speaking, there is today a d iffe r e n t design fo r the face and hack o f each denomination of each kind o f paper currency, and there are f i v e kinds — United States notes, s ilv e r c e r t i f i cates, gold c e r t ific a t e s , Federal Deserve notes and National Bank notes accompanied hy a m u ltip lic ity and duplication o f ch a ra cteris tic features* In so fa r as the new notes are concerned, the p rin cip le of denominational designs has been s t r i c t l y follow ed* That is to say, the emphasis has been placed on the d o lla r value o f the note rather than the kind* Thus, instead o f having d iffe r e n t backsvarying with the kinds of currency, — that is , United States currency or Federal Reserve notes, l e t us say — fo r the new desighs every back o f a given denomination w i l l be absolu tely id en tica l* For example, take a $5*00 b i l l * The back w i l l always bear an engraving of the Lincoln Memorial as a predominating featu re* 'Accordingly, there w ill be only one $5*00 back instead of several fo r the Government to p rin t and protect and fo r the public to become fa m ilia r with* Of course, in so fa r as the faces are concerned, s u ffic ie n t va ria tio n in d e ta il is necessc?.,ry to in dicate the kind fo r purposes of sortin g by barking in s titu tio n s ; that is to say, whether the b i l l is a United States note, a s ilv e r c e r t ific a t e , a gold c e r t ific a t e , a Federal Reserve note, or a National bank note. But here again uniform denominational ch a ra cteristics have been fix e d , the outstanding featu re o f each denomination being a p o rtra it* Thus, in the case of our $5*00 b i l l , on the face side, the p o rtra it of Lincoln w ill - 4 - always appear in the center. a $5.00 h i l l , As a Lincoln p o rtra it w ill always indicate so the p o rtrait of Washington w ill always he found on the 1 !s; of Jefferson on the 2*s; of Hamilton on the HHsJ, of Jackson on the 20*s; of Grant on the 50* s; of Franklin on the 100*s; of McKinley on the 500ls; of Cleveland on the 1,000*8; of Madison on the 5,000’ s; and of Chase on the 10,000*s. We b e lie v e that we have succeeded in accomplishing a great s im p lifi cation o f currency designs and we are confident that we have made counter f e it in g and the ra isin g o f the h i l l s from one denomination to another more d i f f ic u lt in the futu re. The denomination henceforth can always he to ld re a d ily hy the p o rtra it, which is the most d i f f i c u l t thing to cou n terfeit .successfully, and as the public gradually becomes accustomed to associate a given p o rtra it with a given denomination they w ill he in creasin gly pro tected against raised h i l l s and from cou n terfeitin g in general. In connection with co u n terfeitin g I think I should c a ll your attention to another fea tu re. Up to the present time the use o f small segments of s ilk fib r e , lo c a liz e d in rows, have formed part of the d is tin c tiv e features o f our currency. I t has long been f e l t that the prominent s ilk fib r e , lo c a liz e d in rows, was an encouragement to the co u n terfeiter since the public was in clin ed to r e ly on this featu re, which, as a matter o f fa c t, was very e a s ily im itated. In the new currency the small segments o f s ilk fib r e have been retained, but they are scattered throughout the sheet and not lo ca lize d as form erly. The l i f e o f paper currency is in tim ately connected with i t s fitn e s s and we a l l know how desirable i t is to have clean, f i t b i l l s , though not n ecessarily brand-new ones. In order that th is new currency might have a longer l i f e than that o f the old, extensive research work was undertaken r 5 .- with the cooperation of the Bureau of Standards, the Bureau o f E ffic ie n c y , and the manufacturers o f the paper, to develop a type of paper which would have greater endurance and fo ld in g strength and which would, at the same time, meet the manufacturing requirements o f the Bureau o f Engraving and P rin tin g, I t is not every paper o f high strength that w i l l stand the wetting and drying operations incident to the manufacture o f currency. is printed on dampened paper. Our currency Paper when moistened expands hut does not always contract uniformly as i t d rie s , A second w etting is necessary be tween the p rin tin g of the hacks and fa ces, We require, th erefore, a paper that w ill expand and contract uniformly under there conditions in order that the faces on each sheet o f twelve notes may r e g is te r with reasonable ac curacy against the hacks previou sly printed. This is a somewhat severe re quirement when combined with a stipu lated thickness, structure and fo ld in g strength. We have, however, developed a paper b elieved to be sa tisfa cto ry in a l l these respects and with.such an increased strength that we are con fid e n t that the currency w i l l have a longer l i f e . Moreover, in th e ir smaller sizes the notes w i l l gen era lly f i t into pocketbooks without being folded, which is not possible with currency in it s present s iz e , and i t s frequent fo ld in g and creasing eventually breaks the fib r e o f the paper and hastens i t s d e te rio ra tio n . There are at present outstanding some f i v e b i l l i o n d o lla rs worth o f paper currency, or nine hundred m illio n p ieces. These fig u res w i l l , I think, indicate the magnitude o f the task under taken by the Treasury when i t determined to replace th is huge volume o f currency with currency o f a completely new design, P ir s t the engraved dies had to be made and approved in turn. . Prom these master r o lls were prepared and then in turn a s u ffic ie n t number of plates to supply hundreds of presses, each with four plates fo r - p rin tin g . 6 - Our noxt problem was that r f production. I t was necessary to p rin t fo r a complete turnover o f United States and Federal Reserve currency approximately seventy-six m illio n sheets o f twelve subjects each, or nine hundred and twelve m illio n individu al pieces. These have had to go through the various operations o f w etting; hack p rin tin g; examining; a second w etting; face p rin tin g; examining; trimming; numbering and sealin g, and the fin a l cu ttin g into individu al notes. A fte r th is they have to be as sembled into packages o f fou r thousand pieces fo r d e liv e ry to the Treasury. Vast as is the capacity o f the Bureau of Engraving and P rin tin g to accom p lish enormous tasks of th is character, the production o f th is new currency, in part carried on during a period o f substantial production of the o ld -s ize currency to meet the needs o f the past months, has strained the Bureau*s capacity to the utmost. The task has been completed on schedule time, but th is is due e n tir e ly to the s k i l l and ingenuity o f the personnel in overcoming a l l manner o f mechanical and technical d i f f ic u lt i e s , and to the devotion o f the employees gen era lly in th e ir endeavor to maintain the schedule of production that had been determined in advance. The work o f production has, in large measure, been completed except in sc fa r as Rational bank notes are concerned, which involved a special problem, but they, too, are now being produced rapid ly and w i l l be a va ila b le fo r d istrib u tio n at an ea rly date. The problem o f production is behind us. There remains the problem o f d istrib u tio n . As I have stated, there are at present outstanding about nine hundred m illio n pieces o f paper currency. Last year about nine hundred and th ir ty m illio n pieces o f currency were redeemed and about nine hundred and tw en ty-five m illio n pieces o f new cur rency were issued. Roughly speaking, th erefore, the replacement o f the o ld -s iz e currency with the new sm all-size currency is the equivalent o f - 7 - about one year*s ordinary redemptions and issues. This makes i t e n tire ly clea r that i t would not "be possible to undertake the replacing o f a l l outstanding o ld -s iz e currency at one time. I emphasize th is so that you w i ll be prepared to be patien t and must not expect to see the new currency, when issued, almost immediately substituted fo r the old . gradually and c a re fu lly . We must proceed E ssential safeguards are necessary in handling the retirement o f the old which, in e ffe c t , is the basis fo r the issue o f the new. The redemption of currency n ecessarily involves d e fin it e le g a l and, accounting re s tric tio n s and, o f course, there are p h ysic a l.lim ita tio n s both at the Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasury« Therefore, instead of an immediate redemption o f a l l outstanding currency i t w ill be necessary fo r the issue o f the new to be made over a certa in period o f time. The Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks w ill do everything to make this period as short as p ossib le. This means that at the very outset a l l banks applying fo r currency w i l l be rationed, as i t were, and each w i l l be re quired to take a certain percentage o f o ld -s iz e currency assorted from that most f i t fo r circ u la tio n . This percentage o f old currency w i l l be gradually decreased u n til a fte r a period o f a few months i t is an ticipated that a l l old—size currency presented at Federal Reserve Banks w i l l be replaced in f u l l with the reduced-size currency. The f i r s t issue of the new small—size currency w i l l include a l l kinds, except National bank notes, and a l l denominations from $1 . 0 0 to $2 0 * 0 0 . Sm all-size gold c e r t ific a t e s and Federal Reserve notes in denominations above $20.00 w i l l be issued at a la t e r date* The small—s iz e National bank notes w ill be printed and issued in order o f charter numbers, beginning about July 15th. The issue o f the new small—s iz e currency w ill be made through the Federal Reserve Banks and branches. Stocks o f the new—s ize currency have already been placed in Federal Reserve custody in the twelve Federal Reserve Banks and in certain of their branches. The Federal Reserve Banks have been authorized to make available on July 10th to the commercial banking institution s of their respective d is t r ic t s lim ited amounts of new sm all-size currency. But le t me emphasize that the amounts a v a ila b le fo r issue on July 10th w ill be s t r ic t ly lim ited. We anticipate, of course, a curiosity demand which, fo r a comparative' ly short period of time, w ill increase the demand fo r currency, and we are pre pared to meet that curiosity demand, but only to a lim ited extent. A fter, what I may c a ll, the period of i n i t i a l , novelty interest is over, the public must expect the new currency to be issued but gradually and as the old currency is retired as u n fit fo r further circu latio n . This w ill require, as I have already said, a period of least three or four months, during which time both sizes of currency w ill be in circulation , but with the old size gradually disappearing. In so fa r as the Rational bank notes are concerned, it w ill probably take at least six or seven months to complete the turnover. A ll this necessarily w ill involve a certain amount of inconvenience on the part of the public, an in convenience wholly temporary in character and which I think the public w ill appreciate is f u lly ju s t ifie d and is very much outweighed by the advantages to be derived from the substitution of the new currency fo r the old. You can rest assured that the Treasury w ill make every endeavor to accomplish a com plete turnover as rapidly as possible, but in the meanwhile we ask you to be patient; to be s a tis fie d fo r the time being with the currency which has given you reasonable satisfactio n fo r more than sixty years, and no.t to consider i t necessary to carry nothing but the new b i l l s in your pocket. With your cooperation and good w ill i t is probable that a year from now the o ld -size currency b i l l w i ll be a r a rity and in a short time thereafter w ill arouse as much cu riosity as our new b i l l s w ill on Wednesday, next. TREASURY IEFARTî.tEUT ÎÔS IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Monday, July 8, 1929* Acting Secretary M ills today announced that Secretary Mellon had appointed Captain Frank X» A. Eble o f Salt Lake City, Utah, to he Commissioner of Customs, to f i l l the vacancy caused hy the resignation o f Mr* E. W> Camp. The aooointment w ill he e ffe c t iv e today. Captain Ehle was horn in M iln e s v ille , Luzerne County, Pennsylvania A fte r extended experience in the commercial f i e l d , he served in the Arny during the World War. Upon his re turn from France he "became a member o f the ïïar Loan S ta ff o f the Secretary o f the Treasury, in which capacity he assisted the Treasury in the in s ta lla tio n o f improved methods o f pro cedure. Subsequently he became a f f i l i a t e d with the In s titu te o f Govern ment Research in Washington. In 1922, Captain Ehle was appointed a Treasury Agent, with headquarters at B erlin, Germany, fo r duties in con nection with United States customs lav/s. In 1923 he was made Chief of the Service in the B erlin d is t r ic t* In 1924 he was assigned hy the Secretary o f the Treasury to the Finance Committee of the Senate, in which p o sition he assisted the Com mittee in i t s consideration o f the revenue h i l l . He rejoin ed the Customs Service in August 1924, resuming h is B erlin post, and in 1926 accepted the in v ita tio n o f Professor Keramcrer to become a member of the Kemmerer Mission to Poland, fin a n c ia l advisers to that Government. Captain Ehle had charge of the customs administration work o f th is com mission. Returning from Poland in November, 1923, he resumed h is o f-, f i c i a l duties at B erlin , where he has continued up to the present time. FUTURE TREASURY DEPARTMENT RELEASE EOR RELEASE MORNING' PAPERS fTOTTRsSU A Y .T n l v 11 IQ O q , \ I u J Acting Secretary M ills today announced that he has authorized the Federal Reserve Banks to purchase, at the option of holders, fp r account of the sinking fund, up to $75,000,000, or thereabouts, aggregate face amount of 3|- per cent Treasury Notes of Series A-193032, at 98 and accrued in terest* This o ffe r w i ll remain open u n til the close of business on Tuesday, July 16, 1929, and without further notice w ill then terminate, or at such e a r lie r date as the f u l l amount sh a ll have been tendered« Tenders w i ll be accepted in the order in which received, and those making tenders w ill be noti/ied of acceptance or re je c tio n . Any notes tendered fo r purchase must be forwarded at the owner*s own expense and risk , and such note« may accompany the teader, or may be forwarded upon receipt of n o tificatio n from Federal Reserve Bank of? acceptance of o ffe r . In any event the notes accepted must be received at the Federal Reserve Bank on or before Thursday, July 18, and the Federal Reserve Bank on that date w i l l make payment fo r such notes at 98 and accrued interest from March 15 to July 18, 1929, Any Treasury Notes, Series A-1930-32, preserved fo r purchase under this o ffe r, should have attached the coupon bearing date September 15, 1929, and a l l subsequent dates (Nos, 5 to 10 in c lu s iv e )• FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, WEDNESDAY, July 17, 1929 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon today in referring to the offer made on Juljr 11, 1929, to purchase $75,000,000, or thereabouts, aggregate face amount of per cent Treasury Notes of Series A-1930-32, at the option of holders, for account of the cumulative sinking fund, which offer closed last; evening, announced that tenders aggregating $75,869,450 had "been received at Federal Reserve Banks, all of which have been accepted by the Treasury. In te n d e re d * a c c o rd a n c e w i l l .b e from March 15. w ith m ade on th e te rm s Ju ly o f th e 18, 1989, o ffe r a t 98 paym ent and fo r a c c ru e d th e n o te s in te r e s t TH3ASUIV I DEFART! pop b a d i a t e release , July 19, 1929. The Secretary of the Treasury announces the acceptance today of the Did of the 40 Wall Street Corporation in the amount of $5,o01,000 for the purchase of the United States Assay Office property, New York City, in accordance with the terms specified in the Department's advertisement, dated May 20, 1929. Bids were opened on June 34, 1923. ranging in amounts from $5,120,000 to $6,501,000. Six bids were received The.initial payment of $5 0 0 ,000'has been deposited by the highest bidder. Undei the terns of the contract of sale the Department does not guarantee a definite tine when possession may be given to the purchaser, but it is estimated that a new site and new assay office will be readj foi ocuU pancy in approximately four years. TREASURY- DEPARTMENT POR IM! SEDIATE RELEASE, Friday, July 26, 1929* Commenting on the statement of W» D« Euler, Canadian M inister o f National Revenue, that the United States has no e ffe c t iv e check on th e ir own boats and are not required to obtain clearance, Dr* J. M* Doran, Commissioner o f Proh ib ition , said: "No one is in a p o sitio n to know whether the boats engaged in the i l l i c i t liq u or t r a f f i c are Canadian owned or .American owned because nearly a ll vessels which Canada has reported under the trea ty as clearin g fo r the United States with liq u or cargoes are not recorded in the United S ta tes." POR RELEASE MORNING- PAPERS, SUNDAY, JULY 23, 1929. TREASURY DEPARTMENT Statement by the Secretary o f the Treasury. I am g re a tly pleased at the action of Prance in r a tify in g the agree ment fo r the settlement o f the debt owed by her to the United States. Under th is agreement Prance undertakes to meet her obligation s and, by so doing, g iv e s evidence o f that fin a n cia l in te g r ity which has always characterized her conduct. As one 'who helped to negotiate the agreement fo r the settlement, I fe e l tnat much cred it is due to the frankness shown by those representing Prance in disclosin g a l l the fa cto rs involved in a rrivin g at an estimate o f th eir country»s capacity to pay. The American Commission approached the situa tion witn equal frankness and good w i l l ; and the settlement subsequently arrived at is one which we b elieve is eminently f a i r to both nations. I t involved, o f course, some s a c r ific e on the part of both Prance and the United States. But the amount which i t was agreed that Prance could pay♦. was determined without taking into consideration any payments from reparations or other such outside sources; and the astonishing fin a n cia l and economic recovery which Prance has made, even in the short period intervening since the agreement was negotiated, is convincing evidence that great hardship w ill not be imposed on Prance in meeting the payments to America. Furthermore, I am convinced, as I was three years ago when the settlement was made, that the burden which i t involves as regards the French people w ill grow lig h te r , r e la t iv e ly speaking, as time goes on. By r a tify in g th is agreement Prance has now elim inated in the relatio n s o f the two countries a matter which was disturbing so long as i t remained u n settled. At the same time th is action, by disposing o f one o f the la s t - 2 - fin a n cia l problems in h erited from the war, w ill make fo r world s t a b ilit y and w ill prove a powerful fa c to r in promoting general economic progress* In so fa r as th is country is concerned, i t brings to â successful conclusion the task entrusted to the World War Foreign Debt Commission to negotiate settlements with the various nations fo r the debts incurred during and a fte r the war. Agreements have been reached with Great B rita in , Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, L a tvia , Estonia, It a ly , Yugoslavia, Rumania, Greece and France, bringing the to ta l amount which has been funded to date to $11,554,851,000« A ll o f these nations are punctually meeting th e ir engagements; and the payments, as they are received, are being applied on the debt owed by th is Government to i t s bondholders POR RELEASE MORNING- PAPERS, UEUNESDAY, JULY 31, 1S29. TREASURY DEPARTMENT The Secretary of the Treasury today released fo r publication the text o f the notes exchanged between him and the French Ambassador con stitu tin g the Agreement between France and the'United States providing fo r the post ponement o f the date o f the maturity o f the p rin cip al of the indebtedness o f France in respect o f it s purchase o f surplus war supplies maturing August 1, 1929. "July 29, 1929. My dear Mr. Ambassador: The agreement between the French Republic and the United States, known as the Mellon-Berenger Agreement, providing fo r the funding of the payment o f the indebtedness o f the French Republic to the United States, has been r a t ifie d in France in accordance with the terms thereof but has not as yet received the approval o f the Congress of the United States. The said agreement having been r a t ifie d by the Government o f the French Republic, the Secretary o f the Treasury, with the approval of the president, hereby agrees with the French Republic to the postponement o f the date of the maturity o f the p rin cip al of it s indebtedness in respect of i t s purchase o f surplus war supplies maturing August 1, 1929, u n til the Mellon-Berenger Agreement has been approved or disapproved by the Congress o f the United States, but in no event shall such date be postponed beyond May l v 1930r The Congress wi3.1 reconvene shortly, and i t is my expectation that the Mellon-Berenger Agreement w ill receive consideration at an early date - 2 - I t is -understood that the French Republic agrees to continue to pay in terest on the said obliga tion s maturing August 1, 192.9, in accordance with the terms thereof., u n til payment, provided, however, that i f the Mellon-Berenger Agreement is approved by the Congress o f the United States p r io r to May 1, 1930, such amounts paid as in terest p rio r to that date w ill be cre d ite d .to the f i r s t annuities sp e cified in the Mellon-Berenger Agreement* I t is fu rth er understood that in the event o f the approval o f the M ellonBerenger Agreement by the Congress o f the United States the French Republic, within a reasonable time th erea fter, w ill pay to the United States such additional amount as may be necessary to bring to a current basis the payments due up to that time under the terms o f the Mellon-Berenger Agreement.. I shall appreciate i t i f you w ill transmit th is communication to your Government with the suggestion that your Government authorize you to s ig n ify in w ritin g i t s acceptance o f th is agreement and that th is exchange o f le t t e r s constitu tes a d e fin ite and binding agreement between the two Governments. With assurance o f my esteem, I am, Sincerely yours, A. HT* MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury. His Excellency, The Ambassador o f France, *- French Embassy, Washington, "D* C. Approved: HERBERT HOOVER P resid en t." v- . Washington, July 29, 1929. My dear Mr. Secretary: I have the honor to acknowledge receip t o f your l e t t e r of July 29 concerning the report o f the date of payment of the o b liga tio n s contracted by France towards the United States fo r the purchase o f war stocks and coming to maturity on August 1, 1929. I take pleasure in informing you, a fte r having consulted ray Government, that the la t t e r has ju st in v ite d me to n o tify you o f th e ir acceptation o f the conditions-expressed in your communication. Please accept, My dear Mr. Secretary, the re newed assurances o f my high consideration. ( Signe d) Hon. Andrew W. Mellon Secretary o f the Treasury, Washington, D. C* PAUL CLAUDEL. TREASURE DEPARTMENT FCE IIEtEDIATE RELEASE, AITSUST 7 , 1929* I t was announced to-day that Assistant Secretary Henry H errick Bond is tendering h is resignation e ffe c t iv e September 1, 1929», Mr. Bond is from Massachusetts and was appointed "by President Cooli&ge on November 7, 1927, and during h is en tire period of service in the Treasury he has had adm inistrative supervision over the Internal Revenue Service, the o ffic e of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Bureau of Engraving and P rin tin g, the Hint Bureau, the Secret Service D ivision, and the o ffic e of the Disbursing Clerk. During h is term o f o ffic e Hr. Bond has devoted him self p a rtic u la rly to Internal Revenue matters with a view to sim p lific a tio n , settlement o f pending cases and grea ter cooperation between the Department and the taxpayer. Much has been accomplished in these direction s and with the p ra c tic a l com p le tio n of the currency program in connection with the replacement of the old la rg e -s iz e by new sm all-size notes at the Bureau of Engraving and P rin tin g* Hr. Bond has f e l t that the time has arrived when he must return, to p riva te l i f e * p ra ctice of law* I t is h is intention to resume the TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Friday, September 6, 1929. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON To meet a maturity o f about $510,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t i fic a te s , the Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks., an issue o f nine month 4-7/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1930, dated and bearing in te rest from September 16, 1929, and maturing June 16, 1930. The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $500,000,000, or thereabouts. % Applications fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be received a t the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r these c e r t ific a t e s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TS-1929 and TS2-1929, both maturing September 15, 1929, Subscriptions fo r which payment is t> be tendered in c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness maturing September 15, 1929, w i l l b* a llo t t e d in f u l l up to the amount of the o ffe r in g . In addition, 3|- Treasury notes o f Series AA193Q-32, B-1930-32 and C-1930^32 w i l l be accepted a t a p rice o f $98 fo r each $100 face amount, with an adjustment o f in te re s t accrued to September 16, 1929, in part payment fo r any c e r t i fic a te s o f the series now o ffe re d , up to $100,000,000 face amount o f notes; the d ifferen ce between the p ric e o f $98 fo r the notes and the $100 face amount o f the new c e r t ific a t e s to be paid in cash on or before September 16, 1929. Payment by Treasury notes w i l l be treated, as cash subscriptions and w i l l be given preferred allotm ent in the order received. •purposes. These notes are being purchased fo r sinking fund . On subscriptions fo r which Treasury notes are tendered in p a r tia l payment, the face amount o f the Treasury notes tendered must equal the face amount o f the new c e r t ific a t e s subscribed fo r, and such subscriptions must be in m ultiples o f $500. Bearer c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000.- The c e r t ific a t e s w i l l have two in te rest coupons attached, payable December 16, 1929, and June 16, 1930. P a rtic u la r atten tion is in vited to the new tax exemption pro visio n , In accordance w ith the Act o f Congress approved June 17, 1929, the new c e r t ific a te s w i l l be exempt, both as to p rin cip al and in te rest, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. The in terest on c e r t ific a t e s h eretofore issued under the Second L ib erty Bond Act, as amended, has been exempt from the normal income tax Lut from surtaxes only to a lim ited extent. These c e r t ific a t e s , however, w ill be fu lly exempt as to in te re s t from surtaxes, as w ell as normri income taxes, and, accordingly, 3hould be more a ttr a c tiv e to the individu al in vestor. In addition to $510,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness due and payable on September 15, 1929, over $65,000,000 in in te rest payment on the public debt w i l l become due and payable in September, 1929, and over $149,000,000 in October, 1929. The tex t o f the o f f i c i a l c irc u la r fo llow s: The Secretary o f the"Treasury, under the authority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s xor subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1930, dated and bearing in te rest from September 16, 1929, payable June 16, 19o0, with in te rest at the rate o f four and seven-eighths per cent per annum, payable on a semiannual basis. Apulications w ill be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r tific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have twfv in te rest coupons attached, payable December IS, 1929, and June 16, 1930. The c e r t ific a te s o f said series sh a ll be exempt, Doth as to prin cip al and in te rest, from a l l taxation (except estate and in heritance taxes) n*w or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, or by any lo ca l ac ' |g||||ox* taxing authority. •••f.* • £ _ ;, ipfigll•~i-; •*-1 w | || «'|ip| p ? | '|v ** : The c e r t ific a t e s o f this series w i l l be accepted at par during such time and under such rules and regulations as sh a ll be proscribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity o f the c e r t ific a te s . The c e r t ific a t e s of this series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w i l l not be^r the circu la tio n p r iv ile g e . -4- The rig h t is reserved to r e je c t any subscription and to a l l e t less than the amount o f c e r t ific a te s applied fo r and to close the subscriptions at any time without notice. The Secretary o f the Treasury also reserves the rig h t to make allotm ent in f u l l upon ap p lic a tio n s fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotments upon, or to re je c t, applications fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotments and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l be fin a l. Allotment notices w i l l be sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotm ent w i l l be p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in te rest fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d must be made on or before September 16, 1929, or on la t e r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue in terim receipts pending d e liv e ry o f the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l be perm itted to make payment by c re d it fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo t t e d to i t fe r i t s e l f and it s customers up to any amount fo r which i t sh all be q u a lifie d in excess o f e x is tin g deposits, when so n o tifie d by the 'Federal Reserve Bank o f it s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TS-1929 and TS2-1929, both maturing September 15, 1929, w i l l bo accexjted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s o f the series now o ffe re d which sh all be subscribed fo r and a llo tte d , with an adjustment o f the in te rest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r . In addition, throe -5- and one-half per cent Treasury notes o f Series A-1930-32, B-1930-32 and C-1930-32 w i l l Be adcepted at a p rice of $98 fo r each $100 face amount, with an adjustment o f in te rest accrued to September 16, 1929, in part payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s o f the series now o ffe re d , up to $100,000,000 face amount o f notes; the d ifferen ce between the p rice o f $98 fo r the notes and the $100 face amount o f the new c e r t ific a te s to be paid in cash on or before September 16, 1929. The exchange o f notes fo r c e r t ific a t e s w ill.b e treated as cash sub scrijjt ions and w i l l be given p referred allotm ent in the order received. A l l coupons maturing a ft e r September 15, 1929, must be attached to the notes when surrendered, and p rio r coupons should be detached. These notes are being purchased fo r sinking fund purposes. As fis c a l agents o f the United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to re ceive subscriptions and to make a llo t ments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is tr ic ts . TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE» Saturday, September 7, 1929 Acting Secretary M ills announced that subscriptions fo r the issue o f 4*7/8 per cent Treasury C e rtific a te s o f Indebtedness, dated September 16, 1929, Series TJ-1930, maturing June 15, 1930, w i l l close at the close of business on Monday, September 9, 1929, Subscriptions which f a i l to reach a Federal Reserve Bank or branch, or the Treasury Department, before the close o f business on Monday w i l l not be accepted* The practice of accepting mail subscriptions received on the morning fo llo w in g the closin g of the books w i l l not be observed with respect to the current o ffe r in g . TREA8DRT DEPARTMENT POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Wednesday, September 11, 1929. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness, dated September 16, 1929, Series TJ-1930, 4-7/8 per cent, maturing June 16, 1930, closed at the close of business on September 9, 1929* The reports received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe rin g , to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $1,486,000,000. Of these subscriptions, $104,249,000 represent subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness of Series TS-1929 and Series TS2-1929, both maturing September 15, 1929, were tendered in payment, a l l o f which were a l lo tte d in f u l l , and $105.795,500 represent subscriptions fo r which 3^-$ Treasury ITotes were tendered in p a r tia l payment, of which only $100*000,000 were accepted, in accordance with the terms o f the Treasury’ s o rig in a l an nouncement. Allotments on other subscriptions were made as fo llo w s : A l l cash sub scription s in amounts not exceeding $1,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d in f u l l * Cash, subscriptions in amounts over $1,000 but not exceeding $50,000 were a llo tte d 70 per cent, but not less than $1,000 on any one sub scrip tio n ; cash subscriptions in amounts over $50,000 but not exceeding $100,000 were a llo tte d 40 per cent, but not less than $35,000 on any one sub scrip tio n ; cash subscriptions in amounts over $100,000 but not exceeding $1,000,000 were a llo t t e d 30 per cent, but not less than $40,000 on any one subscription; and cash subscriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 were a l lo tte d 15 per cent, but not less than $300,000 on any one subscription. Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks* TREASURY DEPARTMENT POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Friday, September 13, 1929* Secretary Mellon today announced that the t o t a l amount of sub scription s received fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebted ness, Series TJ-1930, 4 7/8 per cent, dated September 16, 1929, maturing June 16, 1930, was $1,486,492,000* a llo tte d was $549,707,500* The to ta l amount of subscriptions Of th is amount, $104,274,000 represents a llo t ments on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness o f Series TS-1929 and TS2-1929, maturing September 15th, were tendered in payment, which subscriptions were a llo tte d in f u l l ; The to ta l also includes $100,000,000 a llo tte d on subscriptions fo r which 3^- per cent Treasury notes were tendered in p a r tia l payment* Allotments on other subscriptions were made on a graduated scale* The subscriptions and allotments were divided among the several Federal Reserve D is tric ts and the Treasury as fo llo w s : Federal Reserve D is t r ic t : Boston New York Ph iladelph ia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St* Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Treasury Total Total Subscriptions Received: $ Total Subscriptions A llo tte d : 74,250,000 653,602,500 143,740,500 97,375,000 37,651,500 58,635,000 116,734,500 27,517,000 16,805,500 28,024,500 62,721,000 168,684,500 750,500 $ 27,218.000 217,362,500 51,105,000 44,753,000 20,001,500 25,650,000 53,914,000 14,167,500 10,186,500 17,320,500 27,814,000 39,523,000 692,000 $1,486,492,000 $549,707,500 TREASURY D3PA93MFT. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Saturday, September 28, 1929. The Secretary o f the Treasury has accepted the o ffe r o f the Potomac E le c tr ic Power Company to d ell to the Government fo r a consideration o f $3,600,000, Squares 259 and 260, together witn the buildings and a l l equipment thereon, except certain cables and sub-station equipment which the contract provides is to be salvaged by the Potomac E le c tr ic Power Company. The contract also provides that the power company ma:^ remain in possession of all. or any part of the land and buildings fo r a period o f eighteen months, rental at the rate o f 5jo per annum o f the contract p rice to be paid to the C-overnment a fte r t i t l e to the property is vested in the United States, and u n til the property is vacated. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1929. Statement by Secretary Mellon. While the fin a l d eta iled estimates o f revenues and expenditures fo r the fis c a l years 1930 and 1931 have not heen completed, the Secretary o f the Treasury considers the estimates have reached the point where tax reduction should he recommended to the Congress at the coming session. The in dication s are that business p r o fit s , dividends, in te re s t and wage payments in 1929 w i l l considerably exceed those o f the year 1928. Our e s t i mates in dicate that the Government should close both the f is c a l years 1930 and 1931 with a surplus. Taking a l l fa c to rs into consideration, the Secre tary o f the Treasury, with the approval o f the President, w i l l recommend tax reduction to the Congress. The form o f r e l i e f to the taxpayers which the Treasury* s recommendations w i l l probably take w i l l be a one per cent reduction of the normal tax on the incomes o f in dividu als and corporations applicable to 1929 incomes and payable in the calendar year 1930. That is to say, on the f i r s t $4,000 o f taxable income the rate w i l l be reduced from one and one-half per cent to one-half o f one per cent; cent to two per cent; on the second $4,000, from three per and on the balance, the present f i v e per cent rate w i ll be reduced to four per cent. The corporation tax rate w i l l be reduced from twelve per cent to eleven per cent. The t o ta l reduction o f taxes to be c o llected during the calendar year 1930 w i l l amount, i t is estimated, to approximately $160,000,000. The reduction, i t is hoped, w ill take the form o f a Joint Resolution of Congress, thus perm itting prompt action by both Houses by avoiding a general revisio n o f the revenue law. The proposal has been discussed with the Republican and Democratic leaders o f both Houses of Congress, who have te n ta tiv e ly approved the proposed recommendation. Treasury Department For release, morning papers, November 27, 1929. Remarks of Honorable A. W. Mellon Secretary of the Treasury on the Occasion of the Presentation of a Medal to Honorable Elihu Root by the National Academy of Design in the Pine Arts Building New York November 26, 1929* Note: For f u l l text of speech see Subject F ile : Secretary's Speeches TREASURY DEPARTMENT; IMMEDIATE PLEASE, NOVEMBER ?~[t 1929- , The Secretary o f the Treasury announces the selection o f a s it e fo r the new Assay O ffic e in New York C ity located on the east side o f Old S lip and extending from-Front Street to South S treet. The s it e consists o f 7 parcels, 5 o f which\are being acquired by voluntary conveyance* I t has been necessary to in s titu te con demnation proceedings fo r the acqu isition o f the other 2 parcels, because o f fexcdssive prices demanded by the owners..- I t is estimated that the en tire s ite w i l l cost approximately $1 , 5 0 0 * 0 0 0 . TREASURY DEPARTMENT ECR RELEASE WHEN DELIVERED (Probably 10:30 A.M.Wednesday, December 4, 1929) Statement of Undersecretary of the Treasury M ills before the Ways end Means Committee Wednesday morning, December 4th. The revenue b i l l introduced by Chairman Hawley and now before th is Committee fo r consideration has the approval o f the Treasury Department. I t s terms are so simple as to require no explanation.« I t provides that the normal tax on the taxable incomes of individu als fo r the calendar year 1929 shall be reduced from \\ per cent to one-half o f 1 per cent on the f i r s t $4,000 o f taxable income; from 3 per cent to 2 per cent on the second $4,000 o f taxable income; and from 5 per cent to 4 per cent on the balance of taxable income; and that the tax on the taxable incomes of corporations fo r the calendar year 1929 shall be reduced from 12 per cent to 11 per cent, The outstanding featu res of th is measure are, f i r s t , that i t lim its the new rates to the calendar year in question, which is a novelty in the h isto ry of income tax le g is la tio n in th is country; and in the second place, that i t gives some measure o f r e l i e f to the maximum number o f income taxpayers, with r e la t iv e ly la rger b en efits to those with the smaller incomes. The reasons fo r the lim ited re v is io n are not fa r to seek: The es timated surplus fo r the fis c a l year 1930 is approximately $226,000,000, and the estimated surplus fo r the fis c a l year 1931 approximately $123,000,000. These fig u re s , to be sure, do not in dicate a very large o margin o f safety7- in "budgets of over $4,000,000,000, but the tax reduc tion of 2150,000,000 which w i l l resu lt from the enactment o f th is b i l l is divided approximate!y equally between the two fis c a l years. Looked at from th is standpoint, the margin of sa fety is reasonably adequate. The Treasury Department fe e ls , therefore, that the taxpayers should re ceive the b en efit of these prospective surpluses in the form of tax re duction. This is a l l the more desirable since both budgets make ample provision fo r retirement o f our national debt in accordance with our w ell-esta b lish ed p o lic y . The estimated expenditures fo r 1930 and 1931 include, re s p e c tiv e ly , $630,000,000 and $635,000,000 fo r debt retirement chargeable against ordinary re ceip ts. A surplus may be recurring or temporary. In the one case, eith er through expanding revenue or reduced expenditures,, assured receipts may have reached the point where they so exceed normal expenditures as to create recurring surpluses. Such a situ ation ju s t ifie s a more or less permanent revisio n o f our tax laws with a view to modifying tax rates downward. In the second case, the surplus may be o f temporary character, a risin g from an unusual increase in re ceip ts or decrease in expenditures, or from conditions not extraordinary which may not have existed fo r a s u ffic ie n t period o f time to permit a d e fin ite conclusion as to th eir permanency. Such surpluses obviously c a ll fo r d iffe re n t treatment. This is p a rtic u la rly true o f a revenue system which places i t s ch ief relia n ce on one form o f taxation, as we now do on the income tax, which 3 is subject to sweeping va ria tion s depending on a v a rie ty o f circum stances "but p rin c ip a lly on the upward and downward flu ctu ation s of "business. Under these circumstances, while a surplus ju s t if ie s some measure o f tax r e l i e f and while the taxpayer should re ceive the fu lle s t possible "benefits from the prosperous condition of the Treasury during the given fis c a l, year, i t is impossible to assure the permanency of the reduced ra les . The estimated surpluses fo r the f is c a l yearis 1930 arid 1931 seem to f a l l into the second class. Moreover, the problem of estimating future revenue is attended by extraordinary d i f f ic u lt i e s at the present time due to the existence of a number of fa cto rs the e ffe c t o f which i t is almost impossible to foresee. The surplus o f the fis c a l year ending June 30 la s t and the current y e a r’ s probable surplus was and w i l l be due, to a very large extent, to the unusual increase in taxable incomes reported by in dividu als, although corporations enjoyed a very prosperous year in 1938, and a l l reports in dicate that th e ir 1929 income w i l l exceed that of 1928, The income tax returned by individu als fo r the calendar year 1927 was $830,000,000, and fo r the calendar year 1928 approximately $1,150,000,000. While wages, sa la ries , dividends, e t c ., showed a substantial increase, the outstanding item in the increased income returned was a gain of approximately $2,000,000,000 in p r o fit s from the sale o f capital assets, both within and without the 2-year period. I t is the unusual increase in th is one item and the im p o ss ib ility o f determining under existin g c i r cumstances what income w i l l be returned from th is source fo r the calendar - 4 - years 1929 and 1930, that make estimating at th is time^ so uncertain a proposition. 'VJe are not only faced with the usual problem o f determining the business trend during the current calendar year and of fo reca st ing the business trend during the coming calendar year, but we are confronted with the d i f f ic u lt problem o f determining what e ffe c t the precipitou s decline of secu rity values re cen tly witnessed w i l l have on the p r o fit s from secu rity transactions, which unquestionably yield ed a very large income in 1923 and fo r the f i r s t eight months o f the calendar year 1929, The pending measure solves the problem of g iv in g to the tax payer the b en efit of the surplus which seems reasonably certain in the fis c a l year 1930 without running too great a ris k o f incurring a d e f ic it during the fis c a l year 1931, I t is estimated that the reduced rates w i l l resu lt in reducing income taxes to be c o lle c te d during the calendar year 1930 by $160,000,000, of which approximately $90,000,000 represents the re duction in corporation taxes, and approximately $70,000,000 the re duction in in dividu al income taxes. Since a l l individu al income taxpayers pay the normal tax, with the exception o f those whose en tire taxable income is derived from dividends, and since m illio n s of stockholders in our corporations in d ir e c tly contribute to the corporation tax, a reduction in the nor mal rate applicable to individu al incomes and a reduction o f the - 5 - corporate tax rate are the means of g iv in g r e l i e f to the maximum num ber o f income taxbearers. In th is connection, i t should be noted that in- the fis c a l year 1929 out o f a to ta l tax revenue of $3,540,000,000, including customs duties, income taxpayers contributed no less than $2,331,000,000. I have stated that the second outstanding feature o f the proposed measure is the r e la t iv e ly la rg er b en efits which i t brings to the people with small, or r e la t iv e ly small, taxable incomes. This must, o f course, be so under a system o f graduated surtaxes when the r e l i e f is lim ited to a f l a t reduction o f the normal ra te. And since incomes in the lower brackets are in the main earned income derived from wages or s a la rie s , i t is a f a i r conclusion that the c h ief b e n e fic ia rie s o f this measure w ill be the wage-earning and salaried taxpayers. The fo llow in g table illu s tra te s the reduction in taxes to be accorded the taxpayers f a l l i n g in d iffe re n t income classes: Comparison o f th e t o t a l ta x p a y a b le u nder th e p r e s e n t law,, and u nder th e r a t e s s u g g e s te d f o r ijS S t, upon a s i n g l e p e rs o n , ana upon a “ a r r i^ e x c e ss o i $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 i s ? r a s s u ^ e f ° t t e t da ? r t a c o m ; n o t i n S 2 S r 5 l0 ' ° ^ r i t t ^ d T earned in com e, and in a d d it io n th a t o n e - fo u r t h o f th e incom e in e x c e s s o f S * o e s n o t in c lu d e income i n P a r t c o n s is t in g o f on th e f i r s t $U,000 $H,.000, taxable , 2$ on th e n e x t and H-> oa r r1 es sussested are M a rrie d roan,, no dep en d en ts Single persoii normal, normal .tax, pres- tax, pro . ent law posed fo r 1Q29 9 «58 2S.-13 4 4,000 $ 13.13 5.000 39.3s 22.50 6.000 56.25 Total net income 3 7,000 8,000 9,000 1 iO I 10,000 15.000 20.000 25,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 jpO, 000 - 70,000 80,000 90,000 -2100,000 Total tax Total tax ' proposed present law fo r 1929 Sur tax Reduction in tax Amount p osed f o r e n t law 1223____ 1.88 5 -6 3 l6.88 5.63 9.32 28.13 I8.75 66,66: $ 26.25 66.66:. 33.75 60.00: .. r 78.75 IOI.25 123.75 37.50 52.50 67.50 U1.25 52.38: US. 75 4a. 15: 56.25 45.45: 78.75 56.88 2X3*75 153*75 445.OO 836.25 90.00 33H.3S 678.75 63.75 41.46: n o . 62 24.86: 157.50 18.83: 101.25 31ÙI 5U7.50 652.50 840.00 1,215.00 5OO.63 865.OO 1,768*75 1,357.50 1,956.25 3,328.75 1,.153*13 1,705.00 2,983.-75 20U.37 1^.05: 251.25 12.84: 3U5.00 IO..36:. 781*88 1,016*25 1,1*85.00 2,028.75 1.590.00 2^497.50 . 1,965.00 2,966.25 2.340.00 2,925.00 4.312.50 5.932.50 H,953.75 6 ,s io ,o o 8 ,8 9 s .75 4,515.00 6.277.50 8.272.50 U38..75 532.. 50 626.25 8.8 6: 7.82: 7«04: 2.715.00 7,688.75 3.090.00 9,540.00 3.490.00 11,440.00 11,123.75 13.UU3.75 15.sU3.75 10,403«75 12.630.00 14.930.00 72O.OO 813.75 913.75 6,47; 6.05: 5*77 * 78.75 • 101.25 123-75 153.75 388.12 622.50 856.87 1,091.25 1,560.00 3.U35.00 7,903.75 U.H03-75 .. 37.50 52.50 67.50 90.00 277.50 $ 465.00 28,13 $ 79.38 56.25 250.000 11,903.75 9,490.00 41.440.00 53,3U3.75 50,930.00 2.U13.75 500.000 2H.U03.75 19,490.00 91.440.00 115.sU3.75 110,930.00 U,913.75 1,000,000 U9.H03.75 39,490.003191.440.00 2U0.sU3.75 .230,930.00 ■9.913-75 T o t a l tax,. T o t a l ta x , p ro p o sed p res e n t f o r 1929 law fo rm a l : llorm al : t a x ,p re s t a x , p ro 9.-32 $ 13.13 22..5O $ of one per icent' th e rem ain d er o f th e t a x a b le n e t income.^ 39.3S 5-63 16.88 28.13 39.32 13.13 22.50 37.50 1.88 5.-63 9 .3 2 13.13 R ed u c tio n in ta:* Amount 3.75 56.61 11.25 56..65 12.75 06.65 26.25 66.66 33.75 60 ..00 41.25 52.32 56*25 22.50 72.75 3 7.50 IOI..25 368*76 52.50 273.13 7 6 1 .2 5 618.75 1 , 282.51 1 ,881.25 1 ,0 9 3 .1 3 3 .2 5 3 .7 5 2 ,9 2 3 .7 5 189.32 1^.77 236.25 12.56 330.00 10.14 423.75 517.50 611.25 8.69 7*68 6.93 705.00 792.75 292.75 6.38 5. 9f 4*52: I I , 828.75 9.430.00 4 i , 440.00:* 5 3 ,2 6 8 .7 5 : 5 P ,2 7 0 .0 0 2,392.75 4.24: 2U ,328.75 19,^30.00 9 1 , 4 4 o .O O :ll5 »7 6 2 .7 5 M l p , 270.00 M 98*75 4.12: 49,323*75 3 9 , 4 3 0 . 0 a 1 9 1 , 4 4 o . 0 0 2 4 o , 7.68 . 7 5 : 25 J) ,8 7 0 00. *9 ^ 2 .7 5 4.50 4.23 4,11 56.25 52.50 216.25 > 405 «00 56.88 213.75 592.50 500.63 780.00 865.OO 1.768.75 1,155.00 1.645.00 2 ,,422.50 1,905.00 4 .3 1 2 .5 0 4 .8 7 8 .7 5 6 ,7 3 5 .0 0 2 ,8 9 1 .2 5 2 ,2 8 0 .0 0 5 . 9 3 2 .5 0 2 .8 2 3 .7 5 4.455.00 6.217.50 8.212.50 3,360.00 2,655.00 3,030.00 7.688.75 1 1 .0 4 8 .7 5 1 0 ,3^3*75 9 ,5 4 0 .0 0 3 .4 3 0 .0 0 1 1 ,4 4 0 .0 0 1 5 .7 6 2 .7 5 I, 1,530.00 951*75 3 .8 2 8 .7 5 4 .3 2 8 .7 5 2».925*tOO 13.368.75 12.570.00 14.870.00 48.75 48.15 '95.63 25-93 142.50 18.72 5 .7 0 In so fa r as corporations are concerned, as pointed out in the 1927 Report of the Secretary o f the Treasury, they are, r e la t iv e ly speaking, overtaxed, and whichever theory be adopted as to the in cidence o f the corporation income tax, i t can hardly "be ddnied that the way to give the greatest Federal tax r e l i e f to the greatest num ber is through a reduction o f the corporation rate. The number of individu als contributing d ir e c t ly to the support of the Federal Government through the Federal income tax has been s t r i c t l y lim ited , and, o f those contributing, the vast m ajority pay but an in s ig n ifi cant amount and at a very low rate. Of 2,434,000 individu al returns showing taxable income, 2,059,000 returned but $32,861,000 o f income tax, while 375,000 returned a tax of $1,109,000,000, The average ra te of ta x on the net incomes of the 2,059,000 individu als was 0.42 per cent, whereas these and other m illio n s o f individuals owning stock in corporations are v ir t u a lly paying taxes through the corpora tions at 12 per cent on that portion o f th e ir income a ris in g from the p r o fit s o f the business enterprises in which they were shareholders. For the calendar year 1927, when the tax rate was 13-2 per cent, a l l corporations reporting net income reported a net income (including tax-exempt in te re s t) before a l l taxes, o f $10,934,031,563. They paid in taxes other than income tax $1,543,516,930, and reported income tax o f $1,131,000,000, making a to ta l o f $2,674,000,000. In other words, 24.46 per cent o f th e ir net income was taken by taxes. In the same year these corporations paid about $5,786,000,000 in cash dividends, which was 52.92 per cent of th eir net income. For every d o lla r paid i I I I - 8 4/7 « - in dividends, 46 cents were paid in taxes. ]Jf a ll corporations "be included - that is to say, corporations reportin g a d e f ic it as w ell as those reporting net income - the percentage o f net income paid in taxes is 34.84 per cent. I am submitting herewith a table showing the re ceip ts and expendi tures fo r the fis c a l year 1929, and estimated receip ts and expendi tures fo r the fis c a l years 1930 and 1931 . -9 R eceipts and expenditures fo r the fis c a l year 1929, on the basis of d a ily treasury statements (u nrevised), and estimated receip ts and expenditures fo r the fis c a l years 1930 and 1931 ~ !j RECEIPTS Ordinary Customs.................... ......... *. ------1 1929 ! ! j 1930 ---------------- ---------- i ! 1931 1 j j-------------- .-- ------ ;-i In tern al revenue: Income ta x....... * ............ . ¡2,330,711,822.66 Miscellaneous in tern al revenue.......................... . , 607,307,548.98 a$602,000,000.00 !a $602,000,000.00 2,480,000,000.00 2,460,000,000.00 635*000,000.00 640,000,000.00 , :2 ,938,019,371.64 • ...... - -.. —----~~~— -j Miscellaneous re ceip ts: Proceeds o f Governmentowned sec u rities -1Eoreign ob liga tion s P r in c ip a l. . i . In t e r e s t ................... Railroad s e c u r itie s ... A ll other s e c u ritie s .. Trust fund re c e ip ts (r e appropriated fo r in vestment)......................... Proceeds sale of surplus p ro p e rty,....................... , Panama Canal t o lls ,e t c . • Other miscellaneous . . . . . 3,100,000,000.00 3,115,000^000.00 )*- ----- --- -------i----- ! • I i 38,790,660.67 ; 160,340,908.23 15,473,795.82 7,031,516.21 97,614,913.00 141,935,095.00 4,708,600.00 6,699,275.00 51,579,059.00 184,564,540.00 11,213,350.00 6,985,540.00 53,641,113.08 46,750,000.00 39,570,000.00 9,398,732.44 28,046,704.23 ; 180,244,636.56 7,139,800.00 28,218,660.00 199,197,091.00 4,604,300.00 28,060,600.00 197,150,277.00 j 492,968,067.24 532,263 ,434.00 1 523,727,666.00 --- --- --- --- ■ L...— _—---------------------- Total ordin ary-receip ts .. ¡4,033,250,225,05 4,249,253,434.00 j------------- £-----------j t EXPENDITURES | Ordinary (checks and i warrants p a id ,e tc .) I j 4,225,727,666.00 ------------------------ l|p 1 i General expenditures: L e g is la tiv e establishment 17,546,655.67 Executive proper....... 487,250.03 State Departm ent..,.. . . . . 13,284,510.33 Tr easury Depar tment.. . • • • 200,447,224.41 War Department,......... 416,901,546.42 Department o f Justice 28,891,620.32 A. — . b-45*090,870.27 .... 364,561,543.‘99 | 1 i 21,702 , 000.00 476 100.00 13,411 ,400.00 239,340 ,900.00 443,153 ,000.00 29,014 ,500.00 , \ 384*900,000.00-— 28,879,500.00 410.700.00 15 ,881*300 209,301,500 439,215,90(3 31.752.000 285-,OO0*^000 - lo 1 I1 1929 EXPENDITURFS( Con' d .) Ordinary ( Con' d .) . General expenditures( Con’ d .) 1 In te rio r Department. \* i i .. j $301,122,596.27 Depart*of A g r ic u ltu r e *i. . . 171,147,262.58 Depart.of Commerce............. 39,987 *346i 45 Depart.of Labor ................ 11,311,190.36 U. S. Veterans * Bureau......... j 417,280,404.40 Other independent o ffic e s and c o m m is s io n s .......... I 40,308,719.63 D is tric t o f Columbia......... j 40,116,586.38 i ] ! 1930 1931 $288,759,700,00 173,796,300.00 58,478,600.00 11,269,300.00 434,451,500.00 $285,810,000.00 •167,068,600.00 51,184,000.00 11,997,400.00 445,325,000.00 51,856,400.00 43,811,200.00 45,581,300.00 45,415,000.00 2,194,420,900.00 2,162,752,200.00 T o ta l......................... 2,106,503,130.91 2,194,420,900.00 Interest on public d e b t ..... c 678,330,399.50 656,000,000.00 Refunds o f receip ts: Customs........... .................... 21,826,435.69 21,009,500.00 Internal revenue................ 190,727,887.12 151,541,000.00 Postal d eficien cy .................. b 94,699,744.06 84,000,000.00 Panama Canal........................... 9,045,647,29 10,111,000.00 Operations in special accts.: R ailroads............ d 1,857,633,06 d 7,925,800.00 War Finance Corporation... d 611,414.95 d 50,000.00 Shipping Board........... . 15,889,059.12 30,447,700.00 A gricultural marketing, loan fund. . 75,000,000.00 Alien property funds....... . d 1,345,327.26 d 500,000.00 Adjusted service c e r t i f i cate fund e .................. . 111,772,809.62 111,775,000.00 Civil Service retirement and d is a b ilit y fund............. 19,955,190.64 20,500,000.00 Investment o f tru st funds: ! Government l i f e insurance fund.................... ............... 52,160,111.83 45,110,000.00 D is tric t of Columbia teachers* retirement fund 503,158.37 585,000.00 Foreign service retirement fund.................... ............... 282,444.12 292,000.00 General ra ilro a d contingent fund.................................... 977,842.88 1,000,000.00 2,162,752,200.00 619,000,000.00 Total ordinary expenditures.. 3,298,859,485.88 3,467,614,700.00 T o ta l............................. . 2,106,485,327.51 Add u n cla ssified ite m s .... ! 17,803.40 ¡3,393,316,300.00 21,009,500.00 141,511,000.00 78,500,000.00 11,845,000.00 1,790,000.00 d 50,000.00 59,417,000.00 200,000,000.00 d 500,000.00 111,775,000.00 20,850,000.00 37,830,000.00 585,000.00 290,000.00 1,000,000.00 - j 1.1 1929 1930 • I j EXPENDITURES ( Con»d .) j ....... . ■-* ■\■■ | Public debt retirem ents chargeable against o rd i j nary receip ts: Sinking fund..................... ; 370,277,100*00 | Purchases from fo reig n | ,1 repayments....................... 571,150.00 j Received from fo reig n { 1 governments under debt s e ttle m e n ts ..*................ 1 175,642,350.00 ! Received from estate taxes 20,000.00 L Purchases from franchise ; tax receip ts (Federal re - ? serve banks and Federal ;■ intermediate cred it banks): 2,933,400.00 F o r fe it u r e s ,g ift s ,e t c . .* 159,703.75 T o ta l......................... . j' 549,603,703.75 Total expenditures chargeable against ordinary r e c e ip t s * ........ 1 i 3,848,463,189.63 Excess o f ordinary receip ts over to ta l expenditures chargeable against o rdinary r e c e ip t s . . . ............. i j J j 184,787,035*42 1931 j J j 389,191,500.00. j 395,624,000*00 20,050,000.00 | 1,800,000.00 214,700,000.00 | 54,100.00 ! 231,500,000.00 6,210,000.00 160,000.00 6,200,000.00 200,000.00 630,365,600.00 ------------ —---------4,023,681,900.00 635,324,000.00 4,102,938,700.00 . m ,' ■ 225,581,534.00 122,788,966.00 . f Includes $2,000,000 estimated by Department o f Commerce fo r tonnage tax, re ceipts on account of which are covered into the Treasury as customs revenue. , tnj exPen^-I^nres o f the Post O ffic e Department and also on account of PPs a l d eficien cy fo r the fis c a l year 1929 (month o f June, 1929) are $42,997,089.50 and $8,999,996, re sp ective ly , representing payment o f so-called back railw ay mail pay to inland c a rrie rs under au th ority o f jo in t resolu tion approved June 6, 1929. c Includes $774,912.65 accrued discount on war-savings sec u ritie s o f matured series. d Excess o f cred its (deduct), e For d e ta ils o f th is account see p.100.- The d ifferen ce between amounts o f a ove charges and the amounts appropriated fo r investment is due to working balance required lo r use of Veterans1 Bureau in making authorized payments from the fund. TREASURY DEPARTMENT DOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, DECEMBER 5, 1929, OR WHEN DELIVERY HAS BEGUN RADIO ADDRESS OF SECRETARY A. W* MELLON FROM STATION WRC, WASHINGTON AND A NET-WORK OF THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY DECEMBER 4, 1929 Each year at the beginning o f a new session of Congress, members o f the P resid en t's Cabinet are required to make a report o f the work o f th eir depart ments during the preceding year. Tonight, fo r the f i r s t time, the radio has made i t possible fo r the Treasury to g iv e a condensed version o f i t s report d irect to the country. Before entering upon the Report i t s e l f , I would lik e to say a word o f the circumstances under which i t has been made each year. When the Treasury was established by the Act o f the f i r s t Congress, meeting in New York in 1789, i t was provided that, among other s p e cified duties, the Secretary o f the Treasury should make reports to Congress on matters pertain in g to his department. Such reports ware made at irreg u la r in te rv a ls but no annual report was made u n til i t was provided in the Act of May 10, 1800, that a, report should be made to Congress at the commencement o f every session, "containing estimates of the public revenue and public expenditures and plans fo r improving or increasing the revenues". In accordance with th is Act, we fin d Secretary G allatin in December 1801, submitting the f i r s t Annual Report. In i t he estimates that fo r the ensuing year the revenues w i l l amount to 10'J* m illio n d o lla rs , o f which 3 i m illion s w i l l be required fo r ordinary expenditures o f the Government and that the remainder can be applied in payment of in te re s t and p rin cip a l o f the public debt, Today these amounts appear very small as compared with the amounts now required to operate the Government. As the country has grown in size and wealth, the volume of the public business has increased, so that the Treasury Report fo r 1929 is obliged to deal with b illio n s where the Report of 1801 was concerned with only a very few m illio n s. g lf g i - 2 - But in i t s essen tials, the la s t report is much lik e the f i r s t . Both have to do c h ie fly with such matters as receip ts and expenditures, debts and taxes; and, in so fa r as the Treasury i t s e l f is concerned, i t s t i l l conforms, both in it s organization and in i t s method o f operation, to i t s ea rly tra d itio n s and in most important respects can show a continu ity in p o lic y from the time when i t was f i r s t established. This is p a rtic u la rly true as regards i t s fundamental p o lic y of keeping expenditures alwas's within re ceip ts, and applying the surplus eith er to tax reduction or in payment of the public debt. The la s t fis c a l year has been no exception to th is ru le. For that year, which ended June 30, 1929, to ta l ordinary receip ts were $4,033,000,000 and expenditures chargeable against ordinary receip ts were $3,848,000,000, g iv in g a surplus fo r the year o f $185,000,000* This surplus has been applied to retirement o f the public debt. During the year the gross debt was reduced from $17,604,000,000 to $16,931,000,000, or a to ta l reduction o f $673,000,000. This la t t e r amount was brought about by the application of the Sinking Fund expenditures and other receip ts ear-marked fo r debt retirement and by the surplus which I have just re ferred to. I might add that the war debt, which reached a peak o f $26,594,000,000 on August 31, 1919, has been reduced in the ten years ending August 31, 1929, to $16,805,000,000, or an average o f nearly a b i l l i o n d olla rs a year fo r the ten-year period. The amount o f in te rest saved, due both to reduction o f the prin cip al o f the debt and lowering o f the average in terest, rate over this period, is about two b illio n d o lla rs. Coming now to the question o f taxes; the Treasury estimates that fo r the next fis c a l year, that is , fo r the twelve months ending June 30th next, there w ill be a surplus o f $226,000,000 of receip ts above expenditures, and fo r the fis c a l year 1931 a surplus o f $123,000„000, A surplus may be recurring ip ',<W : ■|lfI l:l||p|l|i| or temporary. - 3 ~ In the one case, eith er through expanding revenue or reduced expenditures, assured receip ts may have reached the point where they so exceed normal expenditures as to create recurring surpluses. Such a situ ation ju s t ifie s a re visio n , more or less permanently, o f our tax laws with a view to modifying tax rates downward. In the second case, the surplus may be o f temporary character, a risin g from an unusual increase in re ceip ts o f decrease in expenditures; or the conditions, while not extraordinary, may not have existed fo r a s u ffic ie n t period of time to permit a d e fin ite conclusion as to th e ir permanency. surplus obviously c a lls fo r d iffe re n t treatment. Such a This is p a rtic u la rly true of a revenue system which places i t s c h ie f relian ce on one form of taxation, as we do on the income tax, which is subject to sweeping variation s depending on a v a rie ty of circumstances tut p rin c ip a lly on the upward and down ward flu ctu ation s o f business. Under these circumstances, while a surplus ju s t ifie s some measure o f tax r e l i e f and while the taxpayer should receive the fu lle s t possible b en efits from the prosperous condition o f the Treasury during the given f is c a l year, i t is impossible to assure the permanency o f the reduced ra tes. The estimated surpluses fo r the fis c a l years 1930 and 1931 seem to f a l l into the second class. Treasury has recommended: Having in mind a l l of these considerations, the f i r s t , that the normal tax rates on the income of individuals fo r the calendar year 1929, payable in 1930, shall be g per cent, 2 per cent and 4 per cent, instead o f the e x is tin g rates o f l g per cent, 3 per cent and 5 per cent; and second, that the tax ra te on the income o f corporations fo r the calendar year 1929, payable in 1930, shall be 11 per cent instead of the ex istin g 12 per cent. This should resu lt in a decrease of income tax c o lle c tio n s during the calendar ye ax 1930 of approximately $160,000,000 This reduction, i t is - 4 -noped, w ill "bàli© the form o f a, Joint Resolution o f Congress» thus perm itting prompt action by "both Houses hy avoiding a general revisio n of the revenue law. The proposal has already been discussed with the Republican and Democratic leaders of both Houses of Congress, who have te n ta tiv e ly approved the proposed recommendations; and i t is con fiden tly expected that, ea rly in the present session, Congress w i l l take a,ction to g iv e the taxpayers the r e l i e f indicated. This w ill be the f i f t h reduction in taxes which the Federal Government has made w ithin le s s than nine years. While the aggregate amount o f th is la st reducoion may not be so great as form erly, the reduction proposed should be of very re a l b en efit to the taxpayers, e s p e c ia lly to those with earned incomes in the lower brackets. I t is estimated that a married man with no dependents, who at present pays a yea rly tax of $5,63 on a taxable income of $4000, w ill have h is tax reduced to $1.88; with a taxable income of $10,000, he w ill pay $52.50, instead o f, as now, $101.25; and on $15,000 he w ill pay $273.13 instead o f h is present tax of $368.76, In so fa r as the reduction o f the income tax on the incomes of individuals is concerned, under our system o f graduated surtaxes the reduction of the normal rate is of greater b en efit to those with small or moderate incomes than to those with la rger incomes. Income from dividends would re ceive no b e n e fit, sine© dividends are not subject to the normal tax; but those who receive dividends w i l l , o f course, b e n e fit in d ir e c tly from the reduction o f the corporation tax ra te. Turning now to other matters: during the la s t year the Treasury, in connection with i t s plans fo r financing the qu arterly m atu rities of the public debt and in addition to the usual c e r t ific a t e o ffe rin g s , has arranged fo r issuing a new type of secu rity, to be known as Treasury b i l l s ; and under le g is la tio n o f Congress, approved by the President, i t is preparing to issue P 4 *1 ~ 5 - them from time to time on a discount basis with m aturities not exceeding twelve months, to be sold fo r cash under competitive conditions at the lowest discount rates or highest prices bid by prospective purchasers. This provides a new type of short-term G-overnment security fo r banks and other investors., while o ffe r in g many advantages to the G-overnment in i t s financing operations. In July the French G-overnment r a t ifie d the agreement fo r funding i t s war debt to this.country; and th is agreement w i l l sh ortly come before Congress fo r r a t ific a t io n . Settlement o f the Austrian debt has been authorized and the G-reek debt has been s ettled , so that the long negotiations fo r the settlement o f the war debts have now been concluded. $11,579,000,000. The to ta l amount funded is During the fis c a l year 1929, the Treasury received from the various fo reig n governments on account o f th e ir indebtedness to the United States the sum of $199,000,000, of which $39,000,000 was fo r account of prin cip al and $160,000,000 fo r account of in te re s t. Taking up now the question o f banking p o lic y : a review o f the p o lic y of the Federal Reserve Board during the past year shows that i t has endeavored to guard against an undue extension o f cred it through speculative channels and to conserve the country*s cred it resources fo r the purpose o f meeting future requirements o f industry and trade. The strong p o sitio n in which the Federal Reserve System found i t s e l f when the recent sharp decline in security p rices took place, and also the prompt action taken by the System, were important fa cto rs in r e lie v in g the strain incident to th is period of readjustment. In banking, as. in other en terprises of th is country, there is increasing evidence o f a movement toward la rger operating units. The number of branches o f banks in operation has increased and more recen tly there has been a growth also in the number o f groups in which several independent banks are operated more or le s s as a sin gle system. Both of these developments r e fle c t changes in the underlying economic situ ation . The time has - 6 - come when i t would seem wise to undertake a thorough study o f the situ ation with a view to determining the soundness o f the present-day tendencies, and more p a rtic u la rly the lim its of the economic areas within which branch banking may be advantageously permitted. Hasty le g is la tio n , eith er to lib e r a liz e or to con strict lim ita tion s now in e ffe c t , should be avoided, fo r our banking structure is the product o f many years o f dearly-bought experience and is part o f an in tr ic a te economic fa b ric whose parts are clo s e ly adjusted to one another, A too rapid reorganization would be lik e ly to create serious and co stly disburbances that would a ffe c t the en tire country. The Treasury contains many a c t iv it ie s o f which only the b r ie fe s t mention can be made, Turing the la s t year, the Bureau of Engraving and P rin tin g completed the revisio n of the paper currency designs, with a reduction in the size o f the currency. The enforcement of the Federal narcotic laws has continued and has resulted in over fiv e thousand arrests fo r v io la tio n s of these laws during the year. The Bureau of Customs, which c o lle c ts a large part o f our revenue, reports a substantial increase in customs during the year. The Public Health Service has done e ffe c t iv e work-in conserving health and co operating with the various States. The Coast Guard reports a to ta l of 4,375 liv e s saved or persons rescued from p e r il during 1929 and, in addition to i t s other a c t iv it ie s , gave valuable aid in the disastrous M ississippi flood s during the spring o f the year, Turing the past year the reorganization of the Bureau of P roh ibition has been completed in accordance with the Act o f March 3, 1927, The opera tion s of the Treasury Department in the enforcement of proh ib ition are becoming stable and more e ffe c t iv e . The a c t iv it y and cooperation of the several bureaus engaged in these operations are making the business of v io la tin g p roh ib ition laws more d i f f ic u lt and hazardous. | ® i i « i m ^ ^ w # ! ■*;^i*;:”i"-;'i‘y:'‘">c^-x>'\-'^ '-i'-'-''v’:;o^-.f^:ii”^'^I:*;i - 7 - p i3?here remains one more important Treasury a c t iv it y o f which mention must be made. The O ffic e of the Supervising A rch itect, which has charge o f the erection o f public buildings, has proceeded with the work o f remodeling and erectin g buildings within Washington and throughout the country under the Federal Building program which has been authorised by Congress. To date 334 p rojects have been authorised fo r the country at large with a to ta l authorization o f $189,000,000. In the D is tr ic t o f Colombia 9 p ro jec ts have .been authorized and work on some o f the bu ildings, such as the new Department o f Commerce aid the Bureau o f In tern al Revenue, is now under way. These buildings w i l l form part o f the monumental group o f buildings on Pennsylvania Avenue and the M all, extending from the Capitol to the Treasury, and with other plans now being made w i l l add g r e a tly to the beauty and d ig n ity o f the Nation*.s Capital. In so fa r as circumstances permit, the work on these buildings, both in Washington and throughout the country, w i l l be pushed as ra p id ly as possible in order to carry out the P resid en t’ s sound and constructive p o lic y fo r increasing bu ildin g a c t iv it y and so stim ulating a l l other lin e s of endeavor during the months immediately ahead. Such, in b r ie f ou tlin e, are some of the major a c t iv it ie s o f the Treasury during the past year. They in dicate that the Government’ s business is in sound condition and that the Government i t s e l f is in p o sitio n to do i t s part in helping the country to tackle and solve the problems which are ahead problems which, a fte r a l l , o ffe r no insuperable d i f f ic u lt i e s to a people so well-equipped with a l l the essen tia ls o f m aterials, organization, energy and determination to carry the nation forward to a development whose vast proportions we are beginning only dimly to perceive. fl A TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Friday, December 6, 1929» STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe rin g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, an issue of nine month 3-l/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness of Series TS-1930, dated and bearing in terest from December 16, 1929, and matur ing September 15, 1930. The amount of the o ffe r in g is $325,000,000, or thereabouts, Apnlioations w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w ill accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness of Series TD-1929 and TD2-1929, both maturing December 15, 1929. Subscriptions fo r which payment is to be tendered in c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness maturing December 15, 1929, w i l l be given p referred allotment up to $200,000,000« Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations of $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in terest coupons attached payable March 15, 1930, and September 15, 1930. In addition to the o ffe r in g of c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness, the Treasury w i l l on December 10 o ffe r about $100,000,000 o f ninety-day Treasury b i l l s , to be sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. D etails as to this o ffe r in g ,’w i l l be made public on the morning of December 10. ' r;- ■" ■■■ _ 2 rJ ■.■' ••.?■ ;1*■]*r‘V?v f■ '■ - About $700,000,000 of Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness and nearly $97,000,000 in in terest payments on the public debt, become due and payable on December 15, 1929 • The text o f the o f f i c i a l circu la r g iv in g the terms of the o ffe r in g o f c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness fo llo w s: The Secretary of the Treasury, under the authority of the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe rs fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness o f Series TS-1930, dated and bearing in terest from December 16, 1929, payable September 15, 1930, with in te re s t at the rate of three and one-eighth per cent per annum, payable on a semiannual basis. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l b e ‘ issued in denominations of $500, $1,000, $5,000,$10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in terest coupons attached, payable March 15, 1930, and September 15, 1930The c e r t ific a te s of said series sh all be exempts both as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, from a l l taxation (except estate and in h eri tance taxes) now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions of the United States, or by any lo c a l taxing a u th o rity. f?^ ] **C -3- Th.e c e r t ific a te s o f this series w i l l he accepted at par daring such time and under such rules and regulations as sh all he prescribed or approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity of the c e r t i f i cates. The c e r t ific a te s of th is series w i l l he acceptable to secure deposits of public moneys, hut w i l l not hear the circu latio n p r iv ile g e * The rig h t is reserved to re je c t any subscription and to a llo t less than the amount of c e r t ific a te s applied fo r and to close the subscriptions at any time without n o tice. The Secretary of the Treasury also reserves the righ t to make allotment in f u l l upon applications-for smaller amounts, to make reduced allotments upon, or to r e je c t , applications fo r la rger amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotments and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l he fi n a l . Allotment notices w i l l he sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis of the allotment w i l l he p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in terest fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo tte d must he made on or before December 16, 1929, or on la te r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue in terim receipts pending d e liv e ry of the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l he permitted to make payment hy cred it fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo t t e d to i t fo r i t s e l f and it s customers up to any amount fo r which it shall he q u a lifie d in excess of ex istin g deposits, when so n o tifie d hy the Federal Reserve Bank of it s d is t r ic t . Treasury -4- c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness of Series TD-1929 and TD2-1929, both maturing December 15, 1929, w i l l be accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s of the series now o ffered which shall be sub scribed fo r and a llo tte d , with an adjustment of the in terest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a te s of the sefied so paid fo r* As fis c a l agents of the United States ■, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscript ions and to make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks of the re spective d is t r ic t s . TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RSLFA.SE MORNING PIPERS MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1929. Secretary Mellon announced that he has authorized the Federal Reserve Barilos, Beginning on Tuesday, December 10, 1929, and u n til further n otice, to redeem in cash "before maturity, at the h olders’ option, at par and accrued in terest to date o f such optional re demption, Treasury 4 ^ c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1929, and Treasury 4j*f c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-2-1929, both maturing December 15, 1929, TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR MORNING PAPERS, MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1929. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of 3 l/8 per cent Treasury C e rtific a te s of Indebtedness, dated December 16, 1929, Series TS-1930, maturing September 15, 1930, closed at the close o f business on Saturday, December 7, 1929. Subscriptions received through the mails up to 10:00 o 'clo ck Monday morning, December 9th, w i l l be considered as having been received before the close o f the subscription books* TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR RELEASE MORNING PAPERS, Tuesday, December 10, 1989. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness, dated December 16, 1929, Series TS-1930, 3-1/8 per cent, maturing September 15, 1930, closed at the close o f business on Saturday, December 7, 1929, The reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g , which was fo r $325,000,000, or thereabouts, to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $722,000,000. Of these subscriptions, $185,381,500 represent subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1929 and TD2-1929, both maturing December 15, 1929, were tendered in payment, a l l o f which were a llo tte d in f u l l . Allotments on other subscriptions were made as fo llo w s : AH cash subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $1,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d in f u l l . Cash subscriptions in amounts over $1,000 but not exceeding $50,000 were a llo tte d 70 per cent, but not less than $1,000 on any one sub scrip tion ; cash subscriptions in amounts over $50,000 but not exceeding $100,000 were a llo tte d 60 per cent, but not le s s than $35,000 on any one sub scrip tion ; cash subscriptions in amounts over $100,000 but not exceeding $1,000,000 were a llo t t e d 40 per cent, but not le s s than $60,000 on any one subscription; cash subscriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 but not exceeding $25,000,000 were a llo tte d 20 per cent, but not less than $400,000 on any one subscription; and cash subscriptions in amounts over $25,000,000 were a llo tte d 10 per cent, but not le s s than $5,000,000 on any one subscription. Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks treasury department FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1929, STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON Ehe Secretary o f the Treasury gives n otice that tenders are in vited fo r Treasury h i l l s to the amount o f $100,000,000, or th ereabou t! The Treasury b i l l s w ill be sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches th ereof, up to two o 'c lo c k P . M E a s t e r n Standard time, on Friday, December 13, 1929. Tenders w i l l not be received at the Treasury Department, Washington. 116 b i l l s w i l l be dated December 17, 1929, and w i l l mature on March 17, 1930, and on the m aturity date the face amount w i l l be payable with out in te re s t. They w i l l be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $10,000, and $100,000 (m aturity va lu e). I t is urged that tenders be made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l be supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or "branches upon application th erefo r. No tender fo r an amount le s s than $10,000 w i l l be considered. tender must be in m ultiples o f $1,000. Each The p rice o ffe re d must be expressed he basis o f 100, with not more than three decimal places, e. g . , 99.125. Fractions must not he used. Tenders w ill be accepted without cash deposit from incorporated banks and tru st companies and from responsible and recognised dealers in investment sec u ritie s . Tenders from others must be accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent o f the fa ce amount o f Treasury b i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guarantee o f payment by an incorporated bank or trust company. .(TV' ■n | ^ | jH$j'| | g ^ ||j|| - 2 :" - Immediately a fte r the closin g hour for, receip t o f tenders on December 13, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Ranks or branches thereof up to the closing hour w ill he opened and public announcement o f the acceptable p rices w ill fo llo w as soon as possible th e re a fte r, probably on the fo llo w in g morning. The Secretary o f the Treasury expressly reserves the rig h t to r e je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a llo t le s s than the amount applied fo r , and h is action in any such respect shall be fin a l. Those submitting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance or r e je c tio n th ereof. Payment at the p rice o ffe re d fo r Treasury b i l l s a llo tte d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a va ila b le funds on or be fo re December 17, 1929. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in terest (discou n t), from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. The amount o f discount at which the Treasury b i l l s are o r ig in a lly sold by the United States shall be considered as in te rest fo r tax exemption purposes. Department Circular No. 418, dated November 22, 1929, and th is n otice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, prescribe the terms of the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions o f th e ir issue. Copies o f the circu lar may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch th ereof. This o ffe r in g w ill constitu te the f i r s t issue of Treasury b i l l s , which are a new form of Government security authorized by a law enacted by the la s t Congress. While the law authorizes the issuance of Treasury b i l l s with a twelve months’ maturity, gen era lly speaking they w ill be issued, as in the case o f th is o ffe r in g , with a ninety-day maturity or with a m aturity not in excess of three months. Issued from time to time as the current fin a n cia l needs of the Government may dictate and with frequent and convenient m aturities, they should furnish an a ttr a c tiv e medium fo r short-term investment. They are intended to supplement rather than to supplant Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of 3 indebtedness, which with m aturities usually ranging from six to twelve months, have up to the present time constituted the prin cip al medium of short-term Government financing. Treasury b i l l s o ffe r certain advantages as compared with Treasury c e r t ific a t e s . Their issue can be timed to coincide almost exactly with the needs fo r funds as compared with the e x is tin g practice of borrowing four times a year on fix e d dates through c e r t ific a t e -offerin gs; they w i l l not be sold at par with an in te re s t rate fix e d by the Treasury but at a discount rate fix e d by the subscribers through com petitive bidding; th eir m atu rities can be timed to correspond c lo s e ly to the actual c o lle c tio n o f income taxes instead o f f a llin g on the nominal date o f tax payment; and, fin a lly , the Treasury should be able to take advantage o f periods o f seasonal ease fo r short-term borrowing instead o f being compelled to o ffe r a large issue o f s e c u rities during a temporary stringency and high money rates. The Treasury Department b elie v e s that Treasury b i l l s w i l l prove to be an e ffic ie n t and economical additional medium through which the short-term financ ing of the Government may be conducted and hopes that they w i l l receive a favorable reception on the part of the public. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE WHEN DELIVERED Statement by Undersecretary M ills before the Ways and Means Committee, Tuesday, December 10, 1929, in connection with H. R. 6585 providing fo r the settlement o f the indebtedness o f the French Government to the United States, The b i l l now before you fo r consideration provides fo r the approval of the agreement fo r the settlement o f the indebtedness of the French Government to the United States a risin g during the World War and the years immediately succeeding i t s termination, made by the duly authorized representatives of the French Republic, on the one hand, and by the World War Foreign Debt Commission, on the other, and approved by the President o f the United States. The agree ment was signed on A p ril 29, 1926, and is set fo rth in Senate Document No. 102, 69th Congress, F irs t Session. The b i l l was reported by the Ways and Means Committee on May 29, 1926, and passed the House o f Representatives on June 2, 1926. I t was not acted on by the Senate o f the United States. Under date o f July 27, 1929, the French Ambassador o f f i c i a l l y n o tifie d the Secretary o f State that the debt funding agreement with the United States had been r a t ifie d by France, I t remains, th erefo re, but fo r the Congress of the United States to give i t s approval fo r th is agreement to become e ffe c t iv e . Under the authority o f the L ib erty Bond Acts and the Act of July 9, 1918, the Government of the United States extended loans and cred its to the Government o f the French Republic, the p rin cip a l amount of which, together with the accrued and unpaid in te re s t thereon, to ta led approximately $4,230,000,000 as of June 15, 1925, the date as o f which the debt is to be funded under the terms o f the - agreement signed A p ril 22, 1926i 2 - Of th is to ta l $2,933,600,000 represents the p rin cip al o f the obligation s acquired fo r cash advanced, le s s any repayments made on account; $890,000,000 represents accrued and unpaid in te re s t at 5 per cent, the ra te borne by the ob ligation s p rio r to funding, up to June 15, 1925; and $407,000,000 represents the p rin cip al amount of ob liga tion s acquired in connection with the sale on cred it o f surplus war m aterial. On th is la s t mentioned p rin cip a l amount in te rest has been paid currently up to the present time. The basis of the proposed settlement is as fo llow s! A ll unpaid and accrued in te re s t on o b ligation s other than those given fo r the war supplies purchase, was figu red at 4^- per cent up to December 15, 1922, and at 3 per cent from that date u n til June 15, 1925. The 4^ per cent rate is the ra te applied in our settlement with Great B rita in to the indebtedness o f Great B rita in up to the date of settlement. The 3 per cent rate is the rate applied to the indebted ness o f the Belgian Government from December 15, 1922 (up to which point in that case likew ise a 4 j per cent rate had been applied) to the date of settlement. may be added that the 3 per cent rate is the ra te paid by the B ritis h on i t s funded debt fo r the f i r s t 10 years, which furnishes an additional reason fo r lix in g th is rate on the unfunded indebtedness o f other countries during th is interim period. In so fa r as the ob liga tion s given fo r surplus war supplies are concerned, i t is provided that in te rest thereon shall be fix e d at the rate o f 3 per cent from December 15, 1922, to June 15, 1925, with the proviso, however, that any in te re s t a ctu a lly paid during that period in excess o f the 3 per cent rate should be applied on account o f the to ta l sum owed, p rin cip a l and in te re s t, as o f June 15, 1925. It V - 3 - The above-described terms o f settlement resu lt in fix in g the net indebted ness as o f June 15, 1925, at $4,025,386,686.89, made up,as fo llow s: P rin cip a l o f obligation s held fo r cash ad vanced under L ib erty bond a c ts ................ $2,933,405,070.15 Accrued and unpaid in terest at 4 i per centum to December 15, 1922............... 445,066,027.49 $3,378,471,097;64 P rin cip a l o f obligation s given fo r sur plus war supplies purchased on credit.'.-. In te re s t at 4^- per cehtum from the la s t in te rest payment date p rio r to Decem ber 15, 1922, to December 15, 1922,.t . . . 407,341,145.01 6,324,940.79 Total indebtedness as o f December 15, 1922.................... Accrued and unpaid in te rest at 3 per centum per annum on th is amount from December 15, 1922, to June 15, 1925......... Total indebtedness as o f June 15, 1925............................. 413,666,085.80 3,792,137,183.44 284,410,288.75 4,076,547,472.19 Credits Payments received on account o f in terest between December 15, 1922, and June 15, 1925................................................................ Payments on account o f p rin cip al since December 15, 1922 ................... ....................... In te re s t on p rin cip a l payments at 3 pel een turn per annum from date o f payment to June 15, 1925.................... .................... $50,917,643.13 230,171.44 ...........12,970.73 ITet indebtedness as o f June 15, 1 9 2 5 . . . . . . . ........ Paid in cash upon execution o f agreement.. Total indebtedness to be funded into bonds 51,160,785,30 4,025,386,686.89 _______386,686.89 4,025,000,000.00 The agreement provides that there is to be paid in cash upon i t s execution the sum o f $385,686.89, which was a ctu a lly paid, leavin g a to ta l indebtedness to be funded o f $4,025,000,000, which w ill be funded into bonds under the terms o f th is agreement. There is attached to th is statement a schedule showing the to ta l annual payments to be made by Prance. Generally speaking, Prance pays $30,000,000 a year the f i r s t 2 years; $32,500,000 a year the th ird and fourth years, and $35,000,000 the f i f t h year. The annuities increase each year, reaching $125,000,000 in the seventeenth year, th erea fter continuing at that fig u re , X yJj - 4 - except fo r the sixty-second year when the payment is approximately $118,000,000. Thus under the agreement the to ta l p rin cip al o f the funded debt (including $685,000,000 accrued in te re s t) w i l l he repaid in f u l l , with in te rest on the funded p rin cip a l, as fo llo w s: A fte r the f i r s t 5 years and fo r the next 10 years, 1 per cent per annum; fo r the succeeding 10 years, 2 per cent per annum; fo r the succeeding 8 years, 2\ per cent per annum; fo r the succeeding 7 years, 3 per cent per annum; and fo r the remaining 22 years, 3^ per cent per annum. The to ta l payments to he received from Trance on account o f the $3,340,000,000 o rig in a lly loaned are $6,847,674,104.17. The present-day value o f these payments on a 4^ per cent basis is $1,996,509,000, or p r a c tic a lly 50 per cent of the debt funded and something over 47 per cent o f the to ta l amount due as of June 15, 1925. During the four-year period from June 15, 1925, to June 15, 1929, the Trench Government has paid us $102,748,536.74, as compared with the sum of $125,000,000 which would have been payable under the terms o f the funding agreement. Tne sum paid i s la r g e ly accounted fo r by payments o f approximately $20,000,000 a year due in in te re s t on the war supplies o b liga tion s, but in the f is c a l years 1927 and 1928 the Trench Government paid us additional sums which bring the to ta l amount paid during these fis c a l years up to approximately the amount due fo r those years under the terms o f the settlem ent. Such a pro cedure would unquestionably, I b e lie v e , have been follow ed la s t June had i t not been fo r the fa c t that the proposed agreement was coming up in the Trench Parliament fo r fin a l d isp osition one way or the other in July. The payments so made since June 15, 1925 are to be applied towards the annuities f i r s t due under the funding agreement when r a t ifie d . - 5 Since June 15th the French Government has paid us $10,183,528,63, leavin g $12,067,934.63 s t i l l due under the terms o f the agreement, which w i l l become immediately payable as soon as the Congress has given i t s approval to the agree ment, I mention th is fa c t so that the Congress w i l l appreciate that i f the agreement is to receive i t s approval, and i f other public business permits, prompt action is desirable with a View to shvihg the in te re s t on the sum of $ 12 , 000 , 000 . This Committee has devoted so much thought and study to th is particu la r problem and is so thoroughly fa m ilia r with a l l o f i t s phases, and with the protracted negotiations that f i n a l ly led to an. agreement and u ltim ately to r a t ific a t io n by the representatives of the French people by a narrow margin, that I deem i t unnecessary to enter upon a discussion of the reasons which led the members o f the World War Debt Commission to f i x these terms of settlement, and two Presidents o f the United States and the House of Representatives to g iv e them th eir approval other than to say that the terms, in my judgment, while generous to the French people, g iv e due consideration to the rig h ts of our own c itiz e n s . The Treasury Department endorses the pending b i l l and recommends i t s adoption. Statement of amounts payable to the United States on account of the proposed Refunding Bonds to be issued by Prance. Annual Annual Total F isca l P rin cip al in te re s t p rin cip al annual years ___________________________ payment s_____________ payment s__________ payment s_________ $ 4,025,000,000.00 3.995.000. 000.00 3.965.000. 000.00 3.932.500.000. 00 3.900.000. 000.00 3.865.000. 000.00 3,863,650,000.00 3,852,286,500.00 3,830,809,365 .00 3,794,117,458.65 lfo 3,752,058,633.24 3,699,579,219.57 3,636,575,011.77 3,567,940,761.89 3,493,620,169.51 3,413,556,371.21 3,361,827,498.63 3.304.064.048.61 3,245,145,329.58 3,185,048,236.17 3,123,749,200.89 3,061,224,184.91 2.997.448.668.61 2,932,397,641.98 2,866,045,594.82 2,798,366,506.72 2,743,325,669.39 2,686,908,811.12 2,629,081,531.41 2,569,808,569.70 2 509,053,783.94 2,446,780,128.54 2,382,949,631.75 to to 2,317,523,372.54 ,262,049,073.72 ,204,910,545.93 2,146,057,862.31 2,085,439,598.18 2,023,002,786.13 1,958,692,869.71 2$ 2j$ ($38,650,000.00 ( 38,636,500.00 ( 38,522,865.00 ( 38,308,093.65 ( 37,941,174.59 ( 37,520,586.33 ( 36,995,792.20 ( 36,365,750.12 ( 35,679,407.62 ( 34,936,201.70 $30,000,000.00 1926 $30,000,000. 30.000. 000.00 30.000. 1927 000. 32.500.000. 00 1928 32.500.000. 32.500.000. 00 1929 32.500.000. 35.000. 000.00 35.000. 000.1930 1,350,000.00 1931 40 ,000,000. 11,363,500.00 1932 50,000,000. 21,477,135.00 60,000,000. 1933 36,691,906.35 75,000,000. 1934 42,058,825.41 80,000,000. 1935 52,479,413.67 90,000,000. 1936 63,004,207.80 100,000,000. 1937 68,634,249.88 1938 105,000,000. 74,320,592.38 1939 110,000,000. 80,063,798.30 115,000,000. 1940 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 68,271,127.42 67,236,549.98 66,081,280.97 64,902,906.59 63,700,964.72 62,474,984.02 61,224,483.70 59,948,973.37 58,647,952.84 57,320,911.90 51,728,872.58 57,763,450.02 58,918,719.03 60,097,093.41 61,299,035.28 62,525,015.98 63,775,516.30 65,051,026.63 66,352,047.16 67,679,088.10 120,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 69,959,162.67 68,583,141.73 67,172,720.29 65,727,038.29 64,245,214.24 62,726,344.60 61,169,503.21 59,573,740.79 55,040,837.33 56,416,858.27 57,827,279.71 59,272,961.71 60,754,785.76 62,273,655.40 63,830,496.79 65,426,259.21 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 69,525,701.18 67,861,472.21 66,147,316.38 64,381,735.87 62,563,187.95 60,690,083.58 58,760,786.09 55,474,298.82 57,138,527.79 58,852,683.62 60,618,264.13 62,436,812.05 64,309,916.42 66,239,213.91 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 125,000,000. 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 - 2 - $1,892,453,655.80 1,833,689,533.75 1,772,868,667.43 1,709,919,070.79 1,644,766,238.27 1,577,333,056.61 1.507.539.713.59 1,435,303,603.57 1,360,539,229•69 1,283,158,102.73 1,203,068,636.33 3j$ 1.120.176.038.60 1,034,382,199.95 945,585,576.95 853,631,072.14 758,559,909.66 660,109,506.50 558,213,339.23 452,750,806.10 343,597,084.31 230,622,982.26 113,694,786.64 (Í ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 66,235,877.95 64,179,133.68 62,050,403.36 59,847,167.48 57,566,818.34 55,206,656.98 52,763,889.98 50,235,626.12 47,618.873.04 44,910,533.60 42,107,402.27 39,206,161.35 36,203,377.00 33,095,495.19 29,878,837.52 26,549,596.84 23,103,832.73 19,537,466.87 15,846,278.21 12,025,897.95 8,071,804.38 3,979,317.53 $2,822,674,104.17 $ 58,764,122.05 60,820,866.32 62.949.596.64 65,152,832.52 67,433,181.66 69.793.343.02 72.236.110.02 74,764,373.88 77,381,126.96 80,089,466.40 82,892,597.73 85.793.838.65 88,796,623.00 91,904,504.81 95,121,162.48 98,450,403.16 101,896,167.27 105,462,533.13 109,153,721.79 112,974,102.05 116,928,195.62 113,694,786.64 $4,025,000,000. $125,000,000.00 1966 1967 125.000. 000.00 1968 125.000. 000.00 1969 125.000. 000.00 1970 125.000. 000.00 1971 125.000. 000.00 1972 125.000. 000.00 1973 125.000. 000.00 1974 125.000. 000.00 1975 125.000. 000.00 1976 125.000. 000.00 1977 125.000. 000.00 1978 125.000. 000.00 1979 125.000. 000.00 1980 125.000. 000.00 1981 125.000. 000.00 1982 125.000. 000.00 1983 125.000. 000.00 1984 125.000. 000.00 1985 125.000. 000.00 1986 125.000. 000.00 117,674,104.17 1987 $6,847,674,104.17 TREASURY DEPARTMENT POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Wednesday, December 11, 19-23. Secretary Mellon today announced that the to ta l amount of sub scription s received fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebted ness, Series TS-1930, 3-l/8 per cent, dated December 16, 1929, maturing September 15, 1930, was $722,552,500. The to ta l amount of subscrip tions a llo tte d was $351,640,500, o f which $185,381,500 represents a l lotments on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebted ness o f Series TD-1929 and TD2-1929, were tendered in payment. A ll of such exchange subscriptions were a llo t t e d in f u l l , while allotments on other subscriptions were made on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotments were divided among the several Federal Reserve D is tr ic ts and the Treasury as fo llo w s: Federal Reserve D is tr ic t: Total Sub scriptions Received: Boston New York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St, Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ 19 ,-290,000 309.386.500 42.122.000 25.930.500 24.839.000 27.876.000 66.685.000 7,096,500 3,396,000 10.208.500 28.452.000 157.012.500 258,000 $ 7,028,000 189,531,500 16.500.000 11.891.000 13.659.000 14.284.500 45.141.000 5.176.000 1.953.000 6.097.000 14.009.500 26.174.000 196,000 $722,552,500 $351,640,500 Total Total Subscriptions A llo t t e d : TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Thursday, December 12, 1929. In view o f the many in qu iries received at the Treasury with respect to the 2 per cent Consols of 1930 which, hy th e ir terms, are redeemable at the pleasure of the United States a fte r A p ril 1, 1930, Secretary Mellon today announced that these bonds would not be c a lled fo r redemption on A p ril 2, 1930, which is the e a r lie s t date the option reserved to the United States may be exercised. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Saturday, December 14, 1929. Statement by Secretary Mellon. The Secretary of the Treasury announced to-day that the tenders fo r $100,000,000, or thereabouts, o f Treasury B il l s which were o ffe r e d on December 10, 1929, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on December 13, 1929. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $223,901,000. The highest bid made was 99.310, equivalent to an in te re s t rate of about 2 3/4$ on an annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.152, equivalent to an in te re s t rate of about 3 3/8$ on an annual basis. In order to avoid exceeding the to ta l required, only about 80$ o f the amount bid fo r at the la t t e r price was accepted. o f bids accepted was $100,000,000. B ills to be issued i s 99.181. The to ta l amount The average p rice o f Treasury The Treasury is informed that these s ec u rities in 's o fa r as rate of discount i s concerned w i l l be dealt in on the same basis as bankers b i l l s . rate, The average annual on a bank discount basis is about 3^$. \ treasury M PARaam? EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Saturday , December 14,1929 The D irector o f the Mint has announced, that on December 12, 1929, the Philadelphia Mint executed a coinage o f 1,866,800 pieces o f coin, made up o f quarter d o lla rs, dimes, n ickels and cents. To accomplish th is enormous coinage i t was necessary to operate the Mint on a twelve hour basis* This is the largest sin gle dayf s output in the h isto ry of the Mint service, and did not take into account the coinage made at the San Francisco Mint and the Denver Mint; I t is usual fo r the mints to be on an overtime basis at th is period o f the year to meet the seasonal demand, However, this extraordinary accelera tion o f coinage indicates the more than usual demand o f the banks fo r a volume o f coinage to meet the requirements o f business. ' TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 16, 1929. The Treasury today received payments amounting to #98,657,973.52 from the fo llo w in g fo reign governments on account of th e ir funded indebted ness to the United States, of which #97,819,750 was in obliga tion s o f the United States, accrued in te re s t thereon of #671,880.28, and #166,343.24 in cash. GREAT BRITAIN The fourteenth semiannual payment o f in terest and the seventh annual installm ent of prin cip al on the funded indebtedness of Great B rita in to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f February 28, 1923. The to ta l payment amounted to 793,795,000 o f which :p66,795,000 was fo r in te rest and #27,000,000 fo r p rin cip a l, and as autnorized by the terms o f the settlem ent, was made in obligation s of the United States which were accepted at par and accrued in te re s t. The obligation s were #500,000 face amount 3-l/2*C F ir s t L ib e rty Loan bonds due in 1947; $18,282,500 face amount 3-l/2$ Treasury Notes Series C 1930-32, maturing December 15, 1932; #74,358,250 face amount 3—l/2^ Treasury Notes Series B 19o0-e>2, maturing September 15, 1932; accrued in te re s t thereon, 3654,229.33, and cash adjustment o f $20.67. BELGIUM: The ninth semiannual payment o f in te rest on the post-arm istice funded indebtedness o f the Government of Belgium due the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. The payment amounting to $1,375,000, as authorized by the terms o f the settlement, was made in o b ligation s of the United States, which were accepted at par and accrued in te rest.' The obligation s were $891,000 face amount of 3-1/2$ Treasury Notes, Series B 1930-32, maturing September 15, 1932; $467,000 face amount 3-l/2$ Treasury Notes Series C 1930-32, maturing December 15, 1932; accrued in te rest thereon, $16,011.82, and cash adjustment o f $983,18. CZECHOSLOVAKIA: The ninth semiannual installm ent o f p rin cip al on the funded indebted ness of the Government o f Czechoslovakia due the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f May 3, 1926. The payment amount ing to 31,500,000, as authorized by the terms o f the settlem ent, was made in o b ligation s o f the United States which were accepted at par. The obligation s were $1,500,000 face amount F ir s t L ib erty Loan Bonds due 1947. ESTONIA: The eighth semiannual payment on account o f the funded indebtedness o f the Government of Estonia, to the United States due under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. to $125,000 and was made in cash. The payment amounted The balance w i l l be funded in accordance with the option given the Government o f Estonia in the debt settlement agreement. FINLAND: The fourteenth semiannual payment o f in terest and the seventh annual installm ent o f p rin cip al on the funded indebtedness o f the Government of Finland due the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f March 12, 1924* The to ta l payment amounted to $183,680, o f which $130,680 was fo r 'in t e r e s t and $53,000 fo r p rin cip a l, and as authorized by the terms o f the settlem ent, was made in obligation s o f the United States, which were accepted at par and accrued in te re s t. 2>-lf2yo Treasury Notes The obligation s were $182,000 face amount Series B 1930-32, maturing September 15, 1932; accrued 3 in te re s t thereon o f $1,601.30, and cash adjustment of $78.70. HUNGARY: The tw elfth semiannual payment o f in te rest and the sixth annual installm ent o f p rin cip al on the funded indebtedness o f the Government of Hungary due the United States under the terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act o f May 23, 1924. The to ta l payment amounted to $40,218.40, of which $28,973.40 was fo r in te re s t and $11,245 was fo r p rin cip a l. The payment was made in cash. LATVIA: The eighth semiannual payment on account o f the funded indebtedness o f the Government of L atvia to the United States due under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act of A p ril 30, 1926. The payment amounted to $45,000, and as authorized by the terms o f the settlement, was made in o b ligation s of the United States which ?rere accepted at par. The obligation s were $45,000 face amount o f 3-l/2$ F irs t L ib e rty Loan bonds due in 1947. The balance w ill be funded in accordance with the option given the Government of L a tvia in the debt settlement agreement., LITHUANIA: The eleventh semiannual payment of in te rest on the funded indebted ness o f the Government o f Lithuania to the United States under the terms o f the debt settlement approved by the Act o f December 22, 1924. The payment amounted to $94,075.12, and as authorized by the terms o f the s e t t le ment, was made in obligation s o f the United States which were accepted at par. The obliga tion s were $94,050 face amount o f 3~l/2$ F ir s t L ib erty Loan bonds due in 1947, and a cash adjustment o f $25.12. - 4 POLAND: The tenth semiannual payment on account of the funded indebtedness o f the Government o f Poland to the United States under the terms of the debt settlement approved by the Act of December 22, 1924. The payment amounted to $1,500,000, and as authorized by the terms o f the settlement was made in obliga tion s o f the United States, which were accepted at par and accrued in te re s t. The obligation s were $1,495,650 face amount o f Z-l/zfo F irs t L ib erty Loan bonds due in 1947, $4,300 face amount o f 3~l/2^ Treasury Notes Series B 1930—32, maturing September 15, 1932, $37.83 accrued in te re s t on Treasury •Notes, and a cash adjustment of ¿12.17. The remainder due w i l l be funded in accordance with the option given the Government of Poland in the debt settlement agreement. The obligation s o f the United States in the face amount o f $97,819,750 accepted in connection with the payments, have been canceled and re tir e d and the public debt reduced accordingly. fmmm im wamm mwim wm® m m m x9 mmmm m È im . Statement by Cow&iseioner ot ProhiMtic®, £?• Borea* W attenti©?* ben beo» called t© a statement % Sejietor Borali, in ^hieh Ita «tgr» tbeb tbe proli! bit ina law, in bis opinion, v i l i aerar be anforeed by thè preeeat personnel* With e li due respeet te thè Senato?, It »«ae« te me thst sudb a sweepimg eondesmation of e group ©f pnblic «errante «ho are boaeetXy end. eoceclentiously ende&rorl&g to perforai tbe in dsity, i* most infortunate and bound to bere a diebeertenieg effeet ujm3® tbe morale of thè serri ©e* tb i* i» not te esy tbet in e largo ©rgenisftttoa «neb a» thet odf tbe Profeibitiea Bureau tfeere ere not reek epote, It i» set to eey tbet suiministratiom ie not su»capi ibi e to improramaat, bnt to sey tbet prohibition emmot be enforced wltb tbe preeent persona«! eoaes perilously arar to sayiag tbat it ©auaot be eaforoed et «XX* Btsed em uy St ysaro ©f esportene# in tbe Oorerianmt serrioe, I eoa affine tbet en tbe molo re «re not lik ely te finà e more loyal end eoa»eiest ione group ©f men than ere no* serving untar me* In tfei# ©eaneetim, i t ebenX# set b® forgotten tbet tbey ere no» ebosen fra * G iri! Serri«© lie te , based en open ©eapetitire esaminai ione in eeeordanee witb tbe recrgsr» lesti©» net reosntXy pass ed by tbe Coagrees ta l it ie hard to boiler# tbet in tbe future tbe Congrees wiXl autfeorize looking elsewher© for ner recruits. More©Ter snob e eweeping etetemuit orerXoe&e tbe w y aerbed progress whicfe bae beo» onde in tb i« pertieular fie ld of le » enforcesient rbieb in set fortb 1» datati in w report t© tbe Coagroee «ed rbiebie amply eupported by feste* iMportant a» is tse prob la» o f personas!, i t le not the only probian. A» X aae i t f as i de txm. the coopar&tion o f prívate citln en a, there are other fa c to r» ínvolvad la the eaforeeiaent o f the proh ibittoa Xana* th er» mtet be the w lll te eaferee. F irs t, Me ene, X thinfc, w lll deny that un&er the presant Administra*loa tnere he» enlatad e teiele-hearted detem ination t e emforce the Xasr* m i» has besa evideneed by the ciean-cut declarations o f the CSilef Axeoutive, whieh la ay jmdgeant heve not oaly had «a in #p iriiig o ffs e t o» the aéralo o f publlo aervm ta bat have met with a very genulna rasposo m the part e f p rívate eltlse a s * Mo ©na la ay Jiireaa ha» «ay dottbt a » te the pos i t ion e f thia ¿ufcainistration en th l» p ein t. Hat giren the v t ll te catorce, glvon a enltable pera© anal tafeen frote C ivil Serví oe lle ta , there a t l ll rasmia» the problate of th* moet offset iva feind o f m edminlatratIva aet-«pf and th l» relato» not ealy te th» enforoement ef the 1m etthln ser bordar» bat t© the ahattiag © ff ef the »tpply of m ie it licuor frote vlthont oor borden*» Aeting andar iaitruetien» fr e » the preeídemt, in th» ooaree o f the lae* few montb# an exhaustivo »tmdy ha» besa and», not ©nXy e f th» beet mean» te tmprove the admtsiat ration of th» Xawy but of the proper relstion betweem Federal and State ©nforcement torces • A» a resolt e f these »ted ie», there ha» baam prepared and w lll be eubftltted to th» Gongreas a plan ef reorgaaiaatio», whlch la my ittá®»ent w lll prenote the better eaíoreteeant o f tha law* tepreover, th# freasury Department 1» prepared te auholt te th# Congress a progrsm loefelng te the mor» effeetlve preveation o f aategggXtag en oar land bordare hy establishiag a limitad sambar e f poluta of entry and provid ing fe r th# gaardtng e f the arca batwaen thoee poluta by a unified bordar petrel andar th» Coast Quard. Xa »# far as our 'testar frotetier» are coaeeraed, X liter! ä M B U t e * te# «© t e ilte t * progrwi I oofcteg to t hm •fcroa^tteiiiag o f m r O o m t W m rê fleet m t m l y <» Ik# aa#m te l on m v taltmi m U m , #kidi h m m t mttk Ite «^provati o f Ik# ¥r«4»«*y tetarte#«** te #oaete#i«af t rntfirm t t e t gesäte# pro&r### i# tein g » k it te Ik# «atonem ent ©f I t e proh ibition law#, I t e l It e pmtrnmml te Ite te te ra ! Proh ibm on t e n t e # te «Ifm â ilÿ toa&mrirm te 3»©ral© mû e ffic ie n c y , t t e t wy © te n m ll# » X#ate ss# I# teli© *© I t e l a n t e Ite leadership o f Ite fr e # item i Ite r# te# te#a * m te mer© h elpfu l « H ít e t e ©a it e part o f Ik# pu blie, a te fin a lly te ## t e «# adm inistration te ©asteraeh, « program 1# ready t e «a te te # lo a l o Ik# Congress* FOR RELEASE MORNING PAPERS, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 27, 1929, TREASURY DEPARTMENT. . The Treasury Department received yesterday from the Government of France the sum o f $12,067,934.63, being the balance due on account of the annuities under the funding agreement o f A p ril 29, 1926. As authorized by the terms o f the agreement, the payment was made in ob liga tion s o f the United States which were accepted at par and accrued in terest to date. The o b li gations tendered in payment o f the amount due were $10,572,500 face amount 3-l/2$ Treasury Notes; $1,398,600 face amount F ir s t L ib e rty Loan 3-1/2$ bonds due in 1947; $96,820.96 accrued in terest on the ob ligation s; and a cash ad justment o f $13.67. Under date of December 18, 1929, the President approved the b i l l authorizing the settlement of the indebtedness o f the Government of France to the United States. The French Government having r a t i f i e d the settlement in July of th is year, the liellon-Bcrenger Agreement o f A p ril 29, 1926, has now been approved by both governments. The Government o f France since June 15, 1925, the date as o f which the debt is funded under the funding agreement, has paid on account o f the p rin cip al o f the obligation s given fo r cash advances and on account of in terest due on the o b ligation s given fo r surplus war m aterial purchased on c re d it, tne sum of $112,932,065.37. I t has been understood that upon r a t ific a t io n of the debt-funding agreement by both governments, any sums paid by France since June 15, 1925, would be applied on account o f the annuities f i r s t due under the funding agreement. The annuities due up to June 15, 1929, aggregated $125,000,000, thus leavin g a balance due o f $12,067,934.63. The amount which yesterday the Treasury has received/3C5dg[^, th erefore, placQs the annuities on a current basis. The next annuity, amounting to $35,000,000, w i l l be due and payable on June 15, 1930. The obligation s o f the United States accepted in connection with the payment have been cancelled and r e tir e d and the public debt reduced ac cordingly. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Sunday,- December 29» 1929» Statement “by Acting Secretary o f _the_ Treasury M ills . The State Department and the Treasury Department have fo r some weeks past conducted conversations with the German Government with a view to d ra ft ing a proposed agreement covering payments hy Germany to the United States on account of Army Costs and Mixed Claims in the annual amounts recommended hy the Young Committee of Experts. The two Governments are in accord as to the form and terms o f such an agreement, hut i t cannot he d e fin it e ly concluded u n til the Executive Branch o f the Government has heen so authorized hy the Congress. The purpose o f the negotiations was to enable the Executive Branch o f the Government to submit to the Congress in d e fin ite form an agreement ac ceptable to the German Government so that the Congress before granting the necessary authority would have before i t the form of the agreement. The schedule of payments conforms to the annuities proposed by the Young Prom each of Committee fo r the United States. the annuities to be received,. UO,SCO,000 reich-marks are to be a llo c a ted to the s a tis fa c tio n o f Mixed Claims and the balance to the s a tis fa c tio n o f our Government's claims on account o f Army Costs. This is su b sta n tia lly in accord with the program outlined at the White House conference o f May 19» 1929» which was attended by a number o f the leaders o f both Houses o f Congress. The form o f the agreement and the provisions in respect o f postponement, gen era lly speaking, fo llo w the agreements h eretofore negotiated fo r the s e t t le ment o f the debts owed the United States by fo reig n g©vernments. The execution o f this agreement is contingent,, o f course, upon the coming intis e ffe c t o f the Young Plan. righ ts. In the meanwhile the United States retains .a ll._o f it s exist;m g For relea se, morning papers, January 1, 1930. u ° ;| h TREASURY DEPARTMENT ' 'V '-Jy U'V . . . - & .4 •' A Statement "by Secretary Mellon Washington, December 31, 1929, Forecasting the future course o f business can never be done with any certa in ty that i t w i l l be borne out by subsequent events. No one can f u l l y appraise the complex forces which are always at work and i t is hazardous to attempt doing so. I see nothing, however, in the present situ ation that is eith er menacing or warrants pessimism. During the winter months there may be some slackness or unemployment, but hardly more than is usual at th is season each year. I have every confidence that there w i l l be a r e v iv a l o f a c t iv it y in the spring and that during the coming year the country w i l l make steady progress. In the cred it situ ation the trend of money rates is downward. There is plenty o f c red it a va ila b le and we have reason to expect that the ra tes fo r new ca p ita l in bu ilding construction and expansion w i l l be such as to f a c i l i t a t e the promotion and accomplishment o f new under takings. Statements from the executives o f ra ilro a d , public u t i l i t y and in d u stria l concerns during the P resid en t’ s recent Conference were, almost without exception, to the e ffe c t that th eir expenditures fo r new construction and expansion in 1930 w i l l be as much or more than in 1929 The Government’ s finances are in a sound condition which warrants the cut in taxes, and the Government, i t s e l f , is in a p o sitio n to do i t s part in helping the country to meet and solve the problems which are ahead. i t J RA .4Fm,.». . ■—i r 1 EdjR R^Je& C U the ' Secret J9 w TREASURY DEPARTMENT. M •APPEARANCE OP £ I oke! Statement by Secretary Mellon before the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments o f the House o f Representatives, Wednesday, January 22nd. The provisions o f H. R. 8574 now before your Committee fo r consideration may be b r ie fly summarized as fo llo w s: The b i l l provides fo r the creation o f a Bureau o f P roh ib ition in the Department o f Ju stice and fo r the tra n sfer to that department o f the so -ca lled enforcement functions o f the present Bureau o f Proh ib ition in the Treasury Department, and the personnel, records, documents, and a va ila b le appropriations o f the enforcement d iv is io n . The Bureau o f P roh ib ition in the Treasury Department is to be known h erea fter as the Bureau o f Narcotics and In du strial Alcohol and is to be charged with the so -ca lled regu latory functions under the Revenue and P roh ib ition laws. The b i l l meets with the approval o f the Treasury Department. The duty o f enforcing the P roh ib ition laws was vested o r ig in a lly in the Commissioner o f Internal Revenue who, p rio r to the adoption o f the Eighteenth Amendment, was charged with the duty o f c o lle c tin g the excise taxes le v ie d on a lco h o lic liq u ors sold fo r beverage purposes, and administering the provisions o f the Denatured Alcohol Act o f 1906 providing fo r the withdrawal o f alcohol fre e o f tax a fte r denaturation fo r use in the arts and in dustries. Presumably *kt <w / /4 «S - 2 - th is was the reason fo r placin g p roh ib ition enforcement in the Bureau o f Internal Revenue. I t was- an i l l o g i c a l choice. There is no connection between the assessment and c o lle c tio n o f taxes on beverages which i t is le g a l to s e ll* and the enforcement of laws intended to p roh ib it th e ir manufacture, transportation and sale. When the Congress created the Bureau o f Proh ib ition i t formallyrecognized that there is no such relation sh ip* I f th is be so, Proh ib ition is unrelated to the duties o f the Treasury Department and to the purposes fo r which that department was created. The Treasury, gen era lly speaking, IS responsible prim arily fo r managing the finances o f the nation, c o lle c tin g the revenues, and p rotectin g the in te g r ity o f the revenue laws and o f the currency, with a l l in ciden tal duties re la tin g thereto. I know o f no reason, therefore, why the Treasury Department should be charged with the duty o f enforcing an unrelated penal statute. On the other hand, there is a very sound basis fo r Charging the law-enforcement Department o f the Government with th is task. I t is the duty o f the Department o f Justice, acting through United States D is tr ic t Attorneys, to prosecute v io la to rs o f th is and other Federal statutes, and i t seems to me that b etter resu lts may be obtained i f those who are to try the cases are in a p o sitio n to control and d ire c t in vestiga tion s o f v io la tio n s o f the law and the gathering o f evidence necessary fo r th e ir prosecution. As the Wickersham Commission w ell said: - 3 - ” I t is an anomaly that the cases are in vestiga ted and prepared by agencies e n tire ly disconnected with and not answerable to those which are to prosecute them. A ll experience of administration shows the importance of concentration rather than d iffu s io n o f re s p o n s ib ility . I f prosecution, the le g a l side o f enforcement* is pa rtition ed between two d is tin c t agencies, the d iffu sed , ill- d e fin e d , nonlocated re s p o n s ib ility is sure in the long run to be an obstacle to e ffic ie n c y . IJo doubt in certain special situ ation s, where technical knowledge o f a special type is involved and where the number o f prosecutions each year is very small, i t is consistent with a high degree o f e ffic ie n c y to have these few cases in vestiga ted and prepared by some body o f experienced men in some other department and turned over to the Department o f Justice fo r t r i a l . But where the volume is so enormous and the circumstances are so varied as in liq u or prosecutions, th is is not expedient.” In so fa r as the so-ca lled regu latory functions are concerned, i t can be argued with considerable fo rc e that there is no reason why the Treasury Department should issue permits fo r the manufacture of in d u stria l alcohol and fo r the sale of such a lco h o lic s p ir it s as can be le g a lly sold fo r certain sp ecified purposes. At the same time i t is equally clea r that these functions do not f a l l within the ju ris d ic tio n and duties o f the Department o f Justice. In fa c t , they can f a i r l y be said to be e n tire ly fo re ig n to these duties and functions. And since they ane now being performed by the Treasury Department there is no adequate reason fo r removing them - 4 - unless i t can be shown that they lo g ic a lly belong elsewhere. Moreover, there are certain occupational taxes applicable to such perm ittees, as wholesale and r e t a il druggists, which i t is the duty o f the Treasury Department to c o lle c t * as w e ll as on certain of the commodities covered by permits which can le g a lly be sold, such as medicinal liq u or or alcohol in a pure state when sold fo r commercial purposes permitted by law. I do not say the Treasury Department would not be in a p o sitio n to c o lle c t these taxes were the permit system administered by another Department, but the fa ct that i t is administered by the Treasury Department makes the c o lle c tio n of tjpxes somewhat easier from an adm inistrative standpoint. I t may be urged that in d u stria l alcohol and medicinal s p ir its constitu te a p o ten tia l source o f supply fo r i l l e g a l beverages and that as such should be w ithin the control o f the law-enforcement agency. The b i l l , I think, meets that objection by vestin g in the Department o f Justice a f u l l measure o f jo in t control over the issuance of permits and the making o f regu lation s. I recommend the enactment o f the proposed le g is la tio n . treasury department FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS February 1 1 , 1930. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury g iv es notice that tenders are in v ite d fo r Treasury b i l l s to the amount o f $50,000,000, or thereabouts. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o ’ dlock P. M., Eastern Standard time, on February 14, 1930. Tenders w i l l not be received at the Treasury Depart ment, Washington. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be dated February 18, 1930, and w i l l mature on May 19, 1930, and on the maturity date the fa ce amount w i l l be payaole without in te re s t. They w i l l be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1 , 0 0 0 , $1 0 , 0 0 0 , and $1 0 0 ,0 0 0 (m aturity v a lu e ). I t is urged that tenders be made on the printed forms and fo r warded in the special envelopes which w i l l be supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon a pplication therefor. No tender fo r an amount less than $1,000 w i l l be considered. Each tender must be in m ultiples o f $1,000. expressed on the basis o f e. g . , 99.125. 100, The p rice o ffe re d must be with not more than three decimal places, Fractions must not be used. Tenders w i l l be accepted without cash deposit from incorporated banks and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers - in investment secu rities. 2 - Tenders from others must oe accompanied by a deposit of 10 per cent o f the face amount o f Treasury h i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guarantee of pay ment hy an incorporated hank or trust company. Immediately a ft e r the closin g horn- fo r re ceip t o f tenders on February 14th, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up to the closin g hour w i l l he opened and public an nouncement o f the acceptable prices w i l l fo llo w as soon as possible th e rea fter, probably on the fo llo w in g morning. The Secretary of the Treasury expressly reserves the righ t to r e je c t any or a l l tender's or parts of tenders, and to a llo t less than the amount applied fo r , and h is action in any such respect shall be fin a l. Those submitting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance or re je c tio n thereof. Payment at the p rice o ffe re d fo r Treasury b i l l s a llo tte d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a va ila b le funds on February 18, 1930. The Treasury b i l l s w ill be exempt, both as to prin cip al and in te re s t (discou n t), from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. The amount of discount at which the Treasury b i l l s are o r ig in a lly sold by the United States shall be considered as in te re s t fo r tax exemption purposes. Department Circular Uo, 418, dated November 22, 1929, and th is n otice as issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, prescribe the teims o f the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions o f th e ir issue. Copies o f the circu lar may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch th ereof. FOR RELEASE WHEN DELIVERED TREASURY DEPARTMENT Address o f Welcome of Undersecretary o f the Treasury M ills in opening thé Conference on In tern ation al Double Tax ation held at the U. S, Chamber o f Commerce, Friday, February 14, 1930, at 10t30 a. m. On behalf o f the Secretary of the Treasury, I take pleasure in welcoming you to th is informal conference on the prevention of international double taxation, I think we a l l r e a liz e the fundamental objections to double taxation in the domestic f i e l d , - objections that are based on our conception o f what is equitably and economically sound. With the growth o f world trade and commerce, the expansion of business o f an international character, and the flow o f ca p ita l fo r investment purposes over in tern ational boundaries, these objections apply with equal fo rce , and sometimes greater fo rc e , to the taxation o f the same property or income by several countries. Not only is such a 'p ra c tic e inequitable, but subjection to taxation in two or more ju ris d ic tio n s constitu tes a rea l b a rrier to the expansion of in te r national trade and investments with a consequent retarding o f world produc tion and growth o f purchasing power. In h is Annual Report to the Congress the Secretary o f the Treasury c a lled atten tion to the importance of th is question under ex is tin g world conditions and o f i t s v it a l in te rest to the United Statçs, and stated that the Treasury Department proposed to submit i t s conclusions and recommendations to the Congress during the present session. - 2- The purpose o f our meeting to-day is to discuss the general features o f the proposed le g is la tio n and to get the "benefit o f your advice as to the solution o f some o f the important technical problems. R ea lizin g the heavy burdenfe double taxation imposes on commerce and the b a rriers i t raises to the flo w o f investments into fo reign countries with high tax rates, our Government has already, beginning with the 191S Revenue Act, taken a lib e r a l a ttitu d e with respect to the income from trading or investments abroad. American industry a fte r the war was everywhere seeking o u tlets in fo reig n markets. The high poet-war t sis rates in many countries, coupled with the heavy rates in the United States, raised serious barriers to the scught-for expansion. In recognition o f these conditions the United States took the step o f foregoin g a l l or part o f it s tax in respect o f income taxed abroad, Tims double taxation was prevented and the expansion o f trade appreciably fa c ilit a t e d . Again, in the Revenue Act o f 1921, Congress provided that the. shipping p r o fit s derived in this country by foreign enterprises be exempted, provided an equivalent exemption was accorded to the shipping p r o fit s derived abroad by American enterprises. Other countries soon enacted corresponding provision s, with the resu lt that the shipping: " 'r e fit s o f American companies are to-day exempt from tax in p r a c tic a lly a l l important maritime countries and taxable only in the United States. In the meantime other countries, recognizing that the cnmol.at5on o f high income tax rates often consumed most o f the p r o fit s o f in tern ational commerce and that, estates spread over several countries almost vanished a fte r payment o f th e ir respective duties, took measures to a lle v ia t e th is double charge on th e ir taxpayers* - Somethinglike 1$ agreements between European, countries regarding d irect taxes cane into being, and during the - O- coiii.se o f tfre la s t few ^ears there have been a number o f important in ternational meetings attended by experts from a number o f countries, who have devoted much thought and study to th is extremely important problem. Three model conventions have been prepared. The American section o f the In tern ation al Chamber o f Commerce has drafted a uniform code of p rin cip les fo r elim inating the double imposition of income, property, and estate taxes, and th is code was subsequently adopted by the Congress of the In tern ation al Chamber o f Commerce at Amsterdam in July, 1929. The Treasury Department has taken as a basis fo r le g is la tio n th is uniform code, which is the fr u it o f studies carried on years. over a number of One o f i t s prin cip al underlying purposes is to f a c i l i t a t e the flow o f capital to the countries needing i t fo r development purposes by exempting tne y ie ld of th is investment c a p ita l from taxation in the country o f investment and taxing i t only in the country o f residence of the in vestor. This resu lt is to be brought about by applying the p rin cip l o f recip rocal exemption, as exem plified in the case o f shipping p r o fit s , to income from cap ita l received in the form o f dividends and in te rest. In so fa r as the United States is concerned, any loss in revenue which might resu lt from th is recip rocal exemption would be more than compensated fo r by the p a r t ia l elim ination o f the credit fo r fo reig n taxes provided fo r under e x is tin g statutes. The program fu rther contemplates a more equitable system o f taxa tion o f in tern ation al business by imposing taxes on the fo reig n enterprise only i f i t nas a permanent establishment w ithin the taxing country, thus exempting income from casual transactions or from sales e ffe c te d through a bona fid e broker or commission agent. -lu In so fa r as those businesses having permanent establishmentsare concerned, i t is hoped that u ltim a tely a l l income w i l l be subject to only one tax, tne tax to be a llo c a ted on the basis o f the p r o fit s re a liz e d within the taxing country. But in the meanwhile, since the treatment by a country o f it s own nationals or o f corporatioreorganized under it s laws is not properly the subject of in tern ational agreement, the proposal is l i m i t e d to r e s t r ic t in g fo reign countries from taxing p r o fit s other than those earned w ithin th e ir borders u nder some f a i r and w ell-d efin ed ru le o f a llo c a tio n . She e s ta b lis h m e n t o f a f a i r rule o f a llo c a tio n 0r a p p o rtio n m en t i s a d i f f i c u l t and technical question. For instance, when a corporation manufactures in one country and s e lls in anotner through a permanent establishment, how are it s p r o fit s to be allocated? I f i t produces it s raw m aterial in one country* processes in a second, turns i t into manufactured a r t ic le s in a third, and s e lls them in a fourth, how much p r o fit is to be a llo c a ted to each country? There has recen tly been launched in p r a c tic a lly a l l important countries with an income tax a study o f methods o f a llo c a tin g or apportioning business p r o fit s with a view to devising uniform rules or p rin cip les susceptible to gen eral.ap p lication . This is work o f an exceedingly d i f f i c u l t nature. I t is o f primary in te rest to such enterprises as those which you represent, ana on tne basis o f ycur broad experience i t is hoped that you may render valuable assistance in tne film in g o f a solution. One o f the main purposes in in v itin g you here to-day was not only to obtain the b en efit o f your advice on the general problem, but more s p e c ific a lly to obtain your collaboration in fin d in g a suitable and proper answer to th is and other problems o f a h igh ly technical character. -5 - The Treasury Department appreciates exceedingly your w illingness to come here ana to p a rtic ip a te in this discussion* ?Je are hopeful that the labors and studies o f the la s t ten years are about to produce resu lts and that m r country w i l l take the lead in elim inating the tax b a rriers that stand in the way o f the growth o f world trade and industry, accompanied as they would be by an a cceleration o f productive energies and the attainment o f higher economic standards* No bther country in the world is more d ir e c t ly in te rested in the successful coni-letion o f such a program. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOB RELEASE, MORHIfG PAPERS, Saturday, February 15, 1930* Statement by Secretary Mellon* The Secretary o f the Treasury announced to-day that the tenders fo r $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of Treasury B ills which were o f fe re d on February 11th, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on February 14th, 1930. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $186,183,000. The highest bid made was 99.250, equivalent to an in te rest rate o f about 3 pe± cent on an annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.125, equivalent to an in te re s t rate o f about 3^ per cent on an annual ba sis. The to ta l amount o f bids accepted was $56,108,000. average p rice o f Treasury B ills to be issued is 99.174. The The average annual rate on a bank discount basis is about 3.30 per cent. TREASURY DEPAZ ENT TO BE RELEASED UPON APPEARANCE OP THE SECRETARY BEEORE THE COMMITTEE OH WAYS AMD M S » PROBABLY ABOUT 101 30 a. m. Statement o f Secretary of the Treasury Mellon at the Hearing on the B i l l to Reduce In tern ation al Double Taxation "before the Ways and Means Committee, Friday, February 28, 1930. In my Annual Report on the State of the Finances fo r the fis c a l year ended, June 30, 1929, I outlined the general movement to prevent international double taxation and proposed to submit to you, during the present session o f Congress, recommendations as to the manner in which th is Government could p a rtic ip a te in the world-wide e ff o r t to remove th is b a rrier to the expansion o f fo reig n trade and investments. These recommendations have been incorpor ated in the b i l l introduced by your Chairman, Mr. Hawley. The movement to m itigate the e v ils and burdens that a ris e from the taxa tion o f the same income, p r o fit s , or property by two or more countries, has in recent years gathered considerable momentum, due to the high post-war tax ra tes and to the growing r e a liz a tio n that double taxation o f th is character is u n s c ie n tific and unsound. Since 1921 most of the European countries have entered into two-party agreements under which they preclude the double taxation of a l l kinds o f income. cessions. These agreements embody reciprocal con Instead o f one state bearing the en tire burden o f r e l i e f , as is done in the cred it provisions o f the United States Revenue Act, each party to the European type o f agreement shoulders i t s share. agreements d i f f e r w idely in form and content. Unfortunately, these - 2 - While governments have been entering in to various arrangements, in te r national committees o f experts— fo r the most part high government o f f i c i a l s — have heen endeavoring -to evolve a uniform scheme of r e l i e f from double taxa tion* Dr. T. S. Adams has heen the American member o f these committees. The outcome o f these e ffo r t s was the adoption, by the Congress of the In ternational Chamber of Commerce at Amsterdam, July, 1929, o f a uniform code of prin cip les fo r elim inating double taxation. This code was prepared by the double taxation committee, o f the American section o f the In tern ation al Cnamber of Commerce, .and embodies those p rin cip les o f taxation which are considered the most favorable not only fo r American in te re s ts but also fo r world commerce in general. I t represents a consolidation, in so fa r as p ossib le, of the model conventions fo r elim inating double taxation at the Geneva Conference on Double Taxation, October, 1928, and embodies the substance o f the model convention proposed by Dr. Adams at that Conference. The p rin cip les contained in th is code have been follow ed in the proposed le g is la tio n . As you gentlemen know, our revenue laws make p a rtia l provision against the e v ils o f double taxation by cred itin g , against our Federal income tax, taxes Paid in fo reig n countries, and in the case o f shipping p r o fit s , by o ffe r ing to exempt the p r o fit s derived in the United States by fo reig n companies i f the country under the laws o f which th e ir ships were documented grants an equivalent exemption in respect o f the shipping p r o fit s derived by American companies in i t s t e r r ito r y . Argentina, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Great B rita in and Northern Irelan d , I t a ly , Japan, The Netnerlands, Norway, and Sweden are among the countries which meet the requirements fo r reciprocal exemption. Thus, American ships to-day are exempt from tax in many countries in which they embark passengers or fr e ig h t, and are, th erefo re, lia b le only to the income tax o f th is country. The b e n e fits assured the shipping in dustry by th is le g is la tio n are o f very great value indeed. In so fa r as - 3 the cred its fo r fo reig n taxes are concerned, at the time the le g is la tio n was f i r s t enacted the s a c r ific e involved was r e la t iv e ly unimportant, hut as our fo reig n trade and investments expand the c re d its claimed fo r fo reign taxes correspondingly increase, and in 1927 American c itiz e n s and corporations credited $26,534,807 in respect o f the taxes imposed hy other countries.* so, f u l l r e l i e f is not afforded to American enterprises abroad. fo r fo reig n taxes is lim ited . Even Our cred it I t permits the fo reign tax to he credited, in e ffe c t ,o n ly up to the amount o f the American tax. Because fo reign tax rates are in general higher than our rates, Americans s t i l l pay, despite the r e l i e f afforded hy our c re d it, a considerable tax to the fo re ig n countries in which they do business. There are, gen era lly speaking, two lin e s o f approach to the solution o f the double taxation problem; The f i r s t is by trea ty with one or more countries, which involves mutual concessions in respect o f the taxation of the nationals o f the treaty-making countries* The objections to th is method appear to me to be that the con cessions are more l i k e l y to be based on bargaining than on sound p rin cip les of taxation, and that th is method resu lts in the taxation by the United States of the nationals o f d iffe re n t countries on d issim ila r bases. The second basis on which avoidance o f in tern ation al double taxation may rest is exem plified by our present law covering the taxation o f shipping p r o fit s , which as I have already stated, authorizes the exemption o f fo re ig n shipping p r o fit s providing the shipping p r o fit s o f American companies are exempt from taxation in fo re ig n countries. This plan permits the adoption of sound p rin cip les in respect o f the taxation o f income or p r o fit s taxable in d iffe re n t ju ris d ic tio n s , and the o ffe r to a l l countries to apply these p rin cip les uniformly to the taxation o f th e ir nationals providing they w i l l apply the same p rin cip les to the taxation o f American c itiz e n s in th eir respective ju ris d ic tio n s . 17 - > While there are some obvious advantages in the trea ty method, the Treasury Department b e lie ves that what I may c a ll the reciprocal exemption method is the sounder o f the two and more in accordance with tra d itio n a l American p o lic y . Broadly speaking, the measure now before you fo r consideration divides income into two classes: (a) certain items which are to be exclu sively taxed at the residence o f the taxpayer and exempted at source; and (b) other items which are subjected to the f u l l tax o f the country o f source. The items o f income taxable at residence include in te re s t, dividends, patent and copyright r o y a ltie s , and a few other items o f minor importance which can be conveniently taxed only at the residence o f the taxpayer. In tere st and dividends are made taxable at the residence o f the taxpayer prim arily because that is the only place where in te re s t and dividends can be successfully subjected to progressive income tax.' Our withholding provisions and our c o lle c tio n at source (despite unusually good administration o f these provisions of our tax laws) do not work e ff e c t iv e ly as regards in te re s t and dividends paid to fo reign taxpayers. Under the proposed b i l l , we should give up a tax which we do not c o lle c t su ccessfully, fo r a tax which we know we can c o lle c t. In addition, taxation at residence represents the sound p rin cip le of taxing in te rest. Where a tax on in terest is c o lle c te d at source, i t frequently must be borne by the debtor. To accomplish th is end, i t is proposed to secure the exemption in other countries o f such income derived by American investors through o ffe r in g a reciprocal exemption from the American tax. The reciprocal exemption o f the items o f income mentioned should not mean a, s a c r ific e o f tax revenues by the United States but should a ffo rd a - 5 - gain in the course o f time. Under our present law we co llect no tax on dividends flowing to foreign corporations and no normal tax on dividends derived by nonresident alien s. It is true that nonresident alien s are lia b le to American surtax on dividends and other income in excess of $10,000 but i t is impracticable to c o lle c t surtax from them because the co llection of surtax is dependent upon the f i li n g o f a return, and as the alien is beyond the ju ris d ic tio n o f the United States, i t is almost impossible to enforce any penalties fo r fa ilu r e to f i l e the return. At the present time we know from information returns that $ 5,42 6 ,4 20 have been paid in dividends to nonresident aliens who have f i l e d no surtax returns. With regard to in terest, in 192S only $1, 175» 7 withheld from interest paid to nonresident alien s. 7 7 * were As you know the non resident alien on f i l i n g a return is en titled to a $1,500 personal exemption, which means that the Bureau of Internal Revenue a fte r sorting out a l l the ownership c e rtific a te s f i l e d by the nonresident alien and checking h is tax l i a b i l i t y must refund the tax on $1,500 in a considerable number of cases. Again in respect o f interest the nonresident alien is lia b le to surtax i f h is total net income from American sources exceeds $10,000 but the d if fic u lt ie s in co llectin g surtax from them are almost as great as in the case of dividends. - 6 ~ , As only $590,515*13 were withheld from copyright and patent ro y a ltie s in 1928, the exemption o f th is type o f income would he w e ll worth while i f in return we obtain fo r American owners o f patents and copyrights the exemption by other countries o f such income from licen ses in th e ir t e r r ito r y * The items o f income subject to f u l l tax at source includes (l) income from a business, trade, or profession carried on within the country through a permanent establishment; ( 2) fo r personal services performed w ithin the country; compensation and (3 ) income from real estate, including ren tals and ro y a ltie s therefrom, gains from the sale th ereof, and in te re s t on ordinary loans secured by such property. I f a fo re ig n en terprise has a permanent establishment in the United States, such as a fa cto ry, sales o ffic e , warehouse, or any other fix e d place o f business, the United States le v ie s it s f u l l tax thereon at the corporation rate i f the fo reig n enterprise is incorporated, at the combined normal and surtax rates i f the fo reig n enterprise belongs to an individual or partnership* I t is proposed to tax business income at source prim a rily because we cannot permit fo re ig n business concerns to compete with American concerns in our market without subjecting the fo re ig n concern to the same tax which the American concern must pay. S im ila rly, compensation fo r services rendered in the United States by an a lie n individu al, and income from re a l estate situ ated in the United States are to be taxed at the usual rates ~ 7 I f an .American resident in the United States or a corporation organized in the United States derives any o f these types o f income from a fo re ig n country, that country w i l l le v y i t s f u l l tax thereon "but such tax may he cred ited against the .American tax in accordance w ith the c red it provision s authorized hy Section 131 o f the Revenue Act o f 1928, Consequently, under the proposed regime, residents, .American c itiz e n s and domestic corporations, w i l l s t i l l have the b e n e fits o f the cred it provisions in respect o f income taxable abroad, and have the additional advantage o f receivin g th e ir in te re s t, dividends, and r o y a ltie s from abroad without deduction o f any tax in the country assuring the re cip ro ca l exemption* As a consequence o f the exemption in fo reig n countries, th er 8 w i l l be no occasion to cred it taxes in respect o f dividends, in te rest, patent and copyright ro y a ltie s , and the other minor items o f income thus exempted, against the .American tax, which means that the United States w i l l c o lle c t f u l l tax thereon. increase in revenues. This should resu lt in an I t is impossible to compute exactly the amount o f taxes on the above-mentioned items o f income which have been cred ited against the «American tax, but one may deduce from the ra tio o f income derived by Americans from fo reig n sources to the amount derived by foreign ers from American sources that the proposed enactment should not reduce our revenues, but rather increase them in the long run. The machinery fo r bringing the proposed regime in to e ffe c t is very simple. I t consists in extending the application o f the p rin c ip le o f recip ro ca l exemption, now observed in the case o f A 1? ~ 8 ~ shipping p r o fit s , under Sections 212(h) and 231(h) o f the Revenue Act, to dividends, in te re s t and other r e la t iv e ly unimportant items o f income previou sly mentioned« I t is hoped that other countries may meet th is o ffe r o f recip roca l exemption hy means o f corresponding enactments, ju st as has heen done in the case o f shipping p r o fits * The opportuneness o f the proposed h i l l is shown hy the fa c t that in the course o f the la s t year th is Government has received informal advices from Canada, Great B rita in , The Netherlands and Switzerland that they would welcome the p o s s ib ilit y o f entering into recip rocal understandings w ith the United States, A telegram has ju st heen received from the .American Embassy at P aris sta tin g that the French Government wishes to conclude a double taxation arrangement. It is not improbable that th is Government may in due time have occasion to effectu a te recip ro ca l arrangements with Germany, Denmark, Sweden and other countries. The proposed h i l l o ffe r s a uniform and simple basis fo r preventing double taxation as between the United States and such in terested countries. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Friday, March 7, 1930. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, an issue o f nine months 3-1/4 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1930, dated and bearing in te re s t from March 15, 1930, and maturing December 15, 1930. The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $450,000,000, or the re about s. ♦ A pplications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1930, maturing March 15, 1930. Subscriptions fo r which payment is to be tendered in c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness maturing March 15, 1930, w i l l be given preferred allotment up to $150,000,000. Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in te rest coupons attached payable June 15, 1930, and December 15, 1930. About $404,000,000 e f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness and nearly $47,000,000 in in te rest payments on the public debt become due and payable on March 15, 1930, and $100,000,000 o f Treasury B ills become due and payable on March 17, 1930. The text o f the o f f i c i a l circu la r follow s: - 2- The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the authority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s fo r subscrip tion , at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1930, dated and bearing in te re s t from March 15, 1930, payable December 15, 1930, with in te re s t a t the rate o f three and one-quarter per cent per annum, payable on a semiannual basis. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in te rest coupons attached, payable June 15, 1930, and December 15, 1930. The c e r t ific a t e s o f said series sh a ll be exempt, both as to p rin cip al and in te rest, from a l l taxation (except estate and inheri tance taxes) now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions of the United States, or by any lo c a l tax ing authority. The c e r t ific a te s o f this series w i l l be accepted a t par during such time and under such rules and regulations as sh all be prescribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fits taxes payable a t the maturity o f the c e r t ific a t e s . The c e r t ific a te s o f this series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w i l l not bear the circu la tio n p r iv ile g e . -3 - The rig h t is reserved to r e je c t any subscription and to a llo t le s s than the amount o f c e r t ific a te s applied fo r and to close the sub scription s at any time without n otice. The Secretary o f the Treasury also reserves the righ t to make allotment in f u l l upon applications fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotments upon, or to r e je c t , applica tions fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotments and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l be fin a l. Allotment notices w i l l be sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotm ent w i l l be p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in te re s t fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d must be made on or before March 15, 1930, or on la te r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment, Federal Reserve Ranks may issue interim r e c a s t s pending d e liv e ry o f the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any qu ali fie d depositary w i l l be permitted' to make payment by c re d it fo r c e r t i fic a te s a llo t t e d to i t fo r i t s e l f and it s customers up to any amount fo r which i t sh all be q u a lifie d in excess o f e x is tin g deposits, when so n o tifie d by the Federal Reserve Bank of it s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t i fic a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TMr-1930, maturing March 15, 1930, w i l l be accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a te s o f the series now o ffered which sh all be subscribed fo r and a llo tte d , with an adjust ment o f the in te re s t accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r. As fis c a l agents o f the.United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary o f the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is t r ic t s . EOR MOBHIffG PAPERS, MOI'IDAY, MARCH 10, 1930.. 'TREASURY D3PARTMEET. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue o f 3 l/ 4 per cent Treasury C e rtific a te s o f Indebtedness, dated March 15, 1930, Series TP-1930, maturing December 15, 1930, closed at the close o f business on Saturday, March 8 , 1930. received through the mails up to 10 o 'c lo c k 1 0 th, Subscriptions Monday morning, March w i l l be considered as having been received before the close o f the subscription books. FuTURr i R E L E AS 11 UA DD Cu ft pt! y¥ L D ai “I1Tt TREASURY DEPARTMENT }K )E RELEASE MONDAY, MARCH 10, 193(0 mil ffiffiî/Etçr B&Kf-THErW&^um ] k m s , C ( M ..t l'f e , P ffo & A Y D lA i© t o <30À .M , I / 0 0 F o 1/ p n t r I Statement of Undersecretary ck the ^ e a s t ^ M l l f s b l f ^ e ltd©. WayL and Means Committee re la tin g to H,,R. 10480. a b i l l to authorize theTsettlenient o f the indebtedness of the German IfeT cir^ es on account of the awards of the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and C-ermany, and the costs o f the United States Army o f Occupation, The h i l l now before you fo r consideration authorizes the Secretary o f the Treasury, with the approval of the President, to enter in to an agreement with Germany as set out in general terms in the b i l l , providing fo r the complete and fin a l discharge o f the obliga tion s o f Germany to the United States in re spect o f the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany, and the costs o f the United States Army o f Occupation, Under the terms of the Arm istice Convention signed November 11, 1918, and of the Treaty Restoring Frien dly R elations signed at B erlin August 25, 1921j wnich incorporated by reference certain provisions o f the V ers a ille s Treaty, Germany is obligated to pay to the United States the costs of the Lnited States Army of Occupation and to s a t is fy claims o f the American Government or i t s nationals who have suffered lo s s , damage or in ju ry to th e ir persons or property, d ir e c t ly or in d ir e c tly , since Jilly 31, 1914, through the acts o f the Im perial German Government or i t s agents. Army Costs The to ta l costs o f the United States Army of Occupation amount to 4>292,663,435.79, Except fo r cash req u isitio n s on the German Government fo r the use of the Army o f Occupation aggregating $37,509,605.97 and certain other items, such as provost fin e s , abandoned enemy war m aterial, e t c ., amount— ing to <*>7,288,184.33, the United States Government received no payments - 2 - on account o f array costs up to May 25, 1923. On that date the United States and the p rin cip al A llie d Powers signed the so-ca lled Wadsworth Agreement which provided that our army costs should he divided into twelve annual instalments, and should he, during the f i r s t four of the twelve years, a f i r s t charge on cash payments received from Germany a ft e r the expenses of the Reparation Commission and the current ex penses of the A llie d Armies o f Occupation, hut during the la s t eight years should he an absolute p rio r charge on a l l cash payments, except fo r the costs o f the Reparation Commission. R a tific a tio n s o f the Wads worth Agreement were never exchanged hut we received a payment under i t of $14,725,154,40 in January 1925. The Agreement was superseded hy the so-called P aris Agreement o f January 14, 1925, which also covered awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission. This la t t e r Agreement was concluded at a meeting of representatives o f the cred ito r powers, including the United States, c a lle d fo r the purpose o f making d istrib u tio n o f the annuities provided fo r under the terms o f the Dawes Plan, which had been adopted in 1924. Under the provisions o f the P a ris Agreement the United States was to re ceive on account o f i t s army costs, beginning September 1, 1926, the sum o f 55,000,000 gold marks, or about $13,100,000 per annum, which payments were to constitute a f i r s t charge on cash made a va ila b le fo r tran sfer by the Transfer Committee out o f the Dawes annuities a fte r the provision of the sums necessary fo r the service o f the 800,000,000 gold mark German external loan o f 1924 and fo r the costs o f the Repara tion and other Commissions. Under the provision s o f the Wadsworth Agreement our army costs should have been liq u id a ted by the end of 1935. - 3 r Under the P aris Agreement the payments would extend over a period of about 18 years, beginning September 1, 1926. Up to the f i r s t o f September, 1929, the United States had received on Army Cost Account $39,203,725.89 under the Paris agreement. As o f September 1, 1929, there was s t i l l due on account o f army costs $193,936,765,20, Mixed Claims By v irtu e o f an agreement entered in to on August 10, 1922, by the United States and Germany, there was set up a Mixed Claims Commission charged with the duty o f passing upon the claims of American c itize n s a ris in g since July 31, 1914, in respect o f damage to or seizure of th e ir property, rig h ts and in te re s ts , and upon any other claims fo r loss or damage to which the United States or i t s nationals have been subject with respect to in ju rie s to persons or to property, rig h ts and in te rests since July 31, 1914, as a consequence o f the war, and including debts owing to American c itiz e n s by the German Government or by German nationals. The f i r s t meeting o f the Commission was held on October 9, 1922. Up to August 31, 1929, awards had been c e r t ifie d to the Treasury fo r payment which with in te re s t to August 31, 1929, aggregated $172,703,083.71. It is estimated as o f August 31, 1929 that the prin cip al amount o f awards yet to be entered and c e r t ifie d together with in te rest to that date, amount to $53,000,000, and in addition awards to the United States Govern ment with in te re s t to August 31, 1929, amount to $64,934,794.41. In other words, as o f August 31, 1929, i t is estimated that the to ta l awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission made and to be made aggregated with in terest $290,637,878.12. Uo provision fo r the payment of the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission was made u n til the Paris agreement o f January l4 , 1925. The Paris agreement provided that the United States should receive 2-^of a l l receip ts from Germany on account o f the Dawes annuities a va ila b le fo r d istrib u tio n as reparations, provided that the annunity resu ltin g from this percentage should not in any year exceed the sum o f *+5*000,000 gold marks. 1929, Up to September 1, the United States had received from Germany under the Paris agreement fo r account o f mixed claims, $3 1 , 331,*+72.0 3 , which with earnings and p r o fit s on investments amounting to $2 ,l*+9 , 6 9 2 . 7 0 , made ava ila b le fo r distrib u tion $33>921,16^.73» and l e f t $2 5 6 , 6 5 6 , 7 1 3 * 3 9 s t i l l to be provided fo r. I t must be understood in this connection that the fig u re s re la tin g to the to ta l amount fin a lly awarded by the Mixed Claims Commission is n ecessarily only an estimate, since a l l o f the awards have not as yet been made. In the meanwhile, thé Congress in March, 1923, enacted what is known as the "Settlement o f War Claims Act o f 1923". You gentlemen are too fa m ilia r with that act to make i t necessary fo r me to describe i t in d e ta il. S u ffice i t to say that i t made provision fo r the order o f p r io r it y in which mixed claims should be paid, fo r the reten tio n o f part o f the German isroperty held by the A lien Property Custodian and part of the funds to be received on account o f awards made by the a rb ite r to German nationals u n til a certain per centage o f the American claims had been paid, and then fo r the ultim ate return o f the German property and funds to th e ir owners. The act also covered the rate o f in terest to accrue on claims u n til th e ir fin a l liq u id a tio n . Any estimate o f the t o t a l amount due from Germany on account o f mixed claims must depend, th erefore, not only on the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission but on the terms o f the Settlement o f War Claims Act. I t w i l l be observed that the amounts received up to the present time, - 5 ~ "both 021 acco-unt o f army costs and mixed claims, have been paid, not by v irtu e o f m y agreement with Germany looking to the liq u id a tio n o f i t s Treaty o b liga tio n s, but by virtu e o f an «agreement with the cred ito r powers, under the terms o f which they undertook to assign to the s a tis fa c tio n o f our claims 'a portion o f the payments received through the Agent General fo r Reparation’ Payments. This is .an anomalous situ ation . In view o f the fa c t that the other c re d ito r powers have now reached an agreement with Germany fo r the fin a l liq u id a tio n o f th eir claims, the time has come fo r the United States to do lik ew ise. Two courses were open to us* We could eith er jo in with the other cred itors in a general settlem ent, or r e ly on a separate agreement with Germany fo r the s a tis fa c tio n o f our claims. The course o f events which le d to the n ecessity fo r such a decision on our loart was as fo llow s. The Young Plan In I 9 2 S the p rin cip a l c re d ito r powers agreed to set up a committee o f independent fin a n c ia l experts to be entrusted with the task o f drawing up proposals fo r the complete and fin a l settlement o f the reparation problem. The so -ca lled Young Plan is the report which th is committee rendered under date o f June 7 » 1929« As a re s u lt o f the Young committeef s reappraisal o f' Germany1 s capacity to pay, i t recommended a n n u itiz e s smaller than the standard, annuitjr o f the Dawes Plan. the 7 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 gold marks ($ 5 9 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) in fo rce under Beginning with 742,000,000 reichsmarks ($176,000,000) in months ending March 31» 193^* which are considered as the f i r s t Young Plan year, the annuity i:& 1,707»9 0 0 » 0 0 0 reichsmarks ($406,000,000) in the year ending March 31» 1931» ond increases gradually to the maximum o f 2,428,800,000 reichsmarks ($578,000,000) in the year ending March or an average o f 1 , 9 8 8 , 8 0 0 ,0 0 0 continues at abqut reichsmarks ($473,000,000) fo r 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 reichsmarks ($ 3 8 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) to reichsmarks ($405,000,000) fo r an additional 22 years. 37 31, 1966, years,'an d 1 , 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 < . - 6 - I t is obvious that the reduction in the annuities to be paid by Germany n ecessitated a scaling-down o f the amounts a llocated to each o f the Creditor powers under the Dsw©& Flan and the Paris Agreement. The Young Plan undertakes not only to f i x the annuities to be paid by Germany but to a llo c a te those annuities among the several cred ito r powers* United States was a lloca ted annuities averaging 0 6 ,100,000 The reichsmarks ($15,700,000) fo r the f i r s t 37 years and a fix e d annuity o f 40,S00,000 reichsmarks ($ 9 » 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) f o r 15 years th e rea fter. The Young Plan, with some m odifications, which do not a ffe c t our p o sition , was form ally adopted by representatives of a l l the in terested powers, with the exception o f the United States,' at The Hague in January, 1930» end the settlement there reached is now awaiting r a t ific a t io n by the governments and the enactment o f certain necessary le g is la tio n by the German parliament. Two questions present themselves fo r decision: f i r s t , are the annuities provided fo r the United States acceptable to u s*. and, in the second place, should we become p a rties to the Young Plan agreement and re ceive payments through the machinery provided therein, or should we r e ly on a d irect agreement with Germany fo r the s a tis fa c tio n o f our claims? While i t is true that under the so -ca lled Dawes Plan and the Paris Agreement we were to receive on both accounts an annuity o f 100,000,000 gold marks ($ 2 3 , S0 0 , 0 0 0 ) as contrasted with an average o f 6 6 , 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 reichsmarks ($ 1 5 , ~[00,000) suggested under the Young Plan, i t should be p oin t ed out that the so -ca lled Dawes Plan was a temporary measure and that no period was fix e d during which the aforesaid annuities were to be paid. In other words, there was no assurance that we would continue to receive 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 go ld marks a year u n til the claims on account o f arny costs and mixed claims had been completely discharged, haps a b e tte r method o f approach to the P er- =2.yt> - 7 problem is to ascertain whether the proposed a n n u ity involves any essen tial s a c r ific e in the s a tis fa c tio n o f our outstanding claims against Germany* In so fa r && mixed claims are concerned, t f , as is provided in the h i l l no# before you, 40,800,000 reichsmcrksper annum are assigned to th e ir payment, i t is estimated that that amount w i l l be adequate to discharge the Mixed Claims o b lig a tio n in f u l l over the period o f years provided fo r , with in te rest at 5$ on unpaid amounts including the United States Governments claim. Whatever s a c r ific e is involved as compared w ith the Dawes annuity is in the time element. In other words, i t is estimated that i t w i l l require 52 years to pay a l l claims - about 35 years to pay a l l o f the p riva te claims awarded to American c itiz e n s , including the return o f the unallocated in te rest fund belonging to the German claimants, and about 17 years additional to liq u id a te the claims allowed the Government o f the United States. On the basis o f the 45,000,000 gold marks received under the P aris .Agreement, i t was estimated that i t would have required 30 years to pay o f f p riv a te claims and 14 years additional to pay o f f the Government claims. ($ 6, 000, 000 ) I f an average annuity o f 25,300,000 reichsmarks/for 30 years be allocated to army costs, as the proposed agreement provides, i t w i l l liq u id a te that claim in 37 years, a fte r reducing the amount o r ig in a lly due on th is account by 10$, a s a c r ific e sim ilar to that being made by Prance and Great B rita in under the Young Plan. The 55,000,000 marks received under the Paris Agreement would have discharged our army costs claim in about 15 years from September 1, 1929, whereas the annuities proposed under the Young Plan w i l l liq u id a te the balance due a ft e r deducting the 10$ in 37 years and allow in te rest on a l l deferred payments at a ra te o f about 3-5/8$. I t can f a i r l y be said, th erefo re, that except fo r the time element, which is not o f v it a l importance in view o f the fa c t that in te rest i s to be paid, no s a c r ific e is demanded o f us other than a - 8 10$ redaction in our o rig in a l claim fo r army costs, that is as compared with the situ ation ex istin g under the P aris .Agreement, which carried w ith i t no assurance as to continuing payments. The Treasury Department is o f the opinion that the annuities proposed are acceptable. In urging th e ir acceptance, I think I should point out to you that as a p ra c tic a l matter our refu sa l to accept them would almost in evita b ly in volve a readjustment o f the shares to be received by a l l other cred itors, since the report o f the Young committee, which has now been form ally accepted, d e fin it e ly fix e d the lim its o f the to ta l amounts to be paid by Germany and any claim on our part to increase our share must occasion a readjustment o f the shares to be re ceived by others. This brings me to the second question o f whether, as a matter o f p o licy, we should have join ed the other cre d ito r powers by becoming p a rties to the Young Plan and a v a ilin g ourselves o f i t s provisions and machinery fo r the sa tis fa c tio n o f our claims. The Executive branch o f the Government b elieved that i t was wiser and more consistent with our established p o lic y fo r us to re fra in from such a course and to look to Germany d ir e c tly fo r the payment o f the amounts due us. The United States has not p a rticip a ted in the determination o f the to ta l reparations payable by Germany "under the Treaty o f V e rs a ille s or in the c o lle c tio n or d istrib u tio n o f reparation payments h eretofore received . There appears to be no ju s t ific a t io n at th is la t e date fo r in volvin g our country in the re s p o n s ib ilitie s fo r c o lle c tin g , m obilizing, and d istrib u tin g reparation payments which the adoption o f the Young Plan and p a rtic ip a tio n in the organization and management o f the agency created under that plan would n ecessitate. Very obviously we could not properly a v a il ourselves o f the machinery provided fo r by the Young Plan and at the same time refuse to accept any o f the re s p o n s ib ilitie s * The course which we advocate is lo g ic a l, consistent, and sound, even apart from the question o f lin k in g reparation: and debt payments, which, as we have con sisten tly maintained, have no re la tio n in o rig in , p rin c ip le , or in fa ct* Moreover, without even suggesting the p ro b a b ility o f such an event taking place, suppose at some future date G-ermany fin ds i t s e l f unable to continue the conditional payments. I f at that time we are o f f i c i a l l y represented on the board o f the Bank fo r International Settlements, or upon the so -ca lled M v is o ry Committee to be appointed by the Governors o f central banks o f issue o f the p rin cip al countries concerned, we, because o f our comparatively small in te rest in the general settlement, might fin d ourselves in the p o sitio n o f an a rb ite r c a lle d upon to s e t t le and decide a contro v e r s ia l and d i f f ic u lt European question* I t may be urged that our fa ilu r e to become p a rtie s to the Young Plan in volves an element o f s a c r ific e on our part, since we thereby forego the claim fo r a share in the so -ca lled unconditional annuities which we could very ju s tly have advanced in view o f the p r io r it y enjoyed by army cost payments under the terms o f the P a ris Agreement. But aside from the fa c t that the Young Plan did not a llo c a te to the United States any share o f the unconditional annuities and that, judging by events, they could not have been obtained without the most serious kind o f controversy, i t seems to me that the terms o f the agreement which we have submitted to you fo r approval ^ p l y protect the in te re s ts o f the United States and o f i t s n ationals. it s terms G-ermany makes an u n qu alified and unconditional promise to pay. Under The only proviso which in any way lim its that o b lig a tio n is the one which is found in a l l o f our debt settlement agreements and which permits the debtor to postpone payments fo r a lim ite d period o f time, with in te rest on the postponed payments. - 10 - The Treasury Department, therefore, recommends the passage o f the "bill under consideration granting to the Secretary o f the Treasury, with the approval o f the President, the authority to enter into the agreement the terms o f which are set fo rth in Senate Document No. 95, 71st Congress, Second Session. In "brief, the agreement provides that Germany agrees to pay 40,800,000 reichsmarks per annum fo r the period September 1, 1929, to March 31, 1930, and the sum o f 40,800,000 reichsmarks per annum from A p ril 1, 1930 to March 31, 1981, in s a tis fa c tio n o f Mixed Claims, and beginning September 1, 1929, an average annuity o f 25,300,000 reichsmarks fo r 37 years in f u l l liq u id a tio n o f our army costs. As evidence o f th is indebtedness Germany is to issue to the United States, at par, bonds maturing semi-annually. Germany, at i t s option, upon not less than 90 days* advance n otice, may postpone any payment on account o f p rin cip a l f a llin g due to any subsequent September 30th and March 31st not more than 2-|- years distant from i t s due date, but only on condition that i f th is option is exercised the two pay ments f a l l i n g due in the next succeeding than 2 12 months cannot be postponed more years, and the two payments f a l l i n g due in the second succeeding 12 months cannot be postponed more than 1 year unless the payments previou sly postponed have actu ally been made. A ll postponed payments on account o f mixed claims are to bear in te re s t, at 5$, the rate provided in the S e ttle ment o f War Claims Act, and a l l payments postponed on account of army costs are to bear in terest at the rate o f 3-5/8$. While the annuities are stated in terms of reichsmarks, payments are to be made in d o lla rs, eith er at the Treasury or at the Federal Reserve Bark o f New York. The exchange value o f the mark in re la tio n to the d ollar shall be calculated at the average o f the middle rates p re v a ilin g on the B erlin bourse during the h a lf monthly period preceding the date o f payment. The German - ir Government undertakes that the reichsmark sh all have and sh all retain i t s c o n v e r t ib ilit y into gold or devisen as contemplated in the present Reichsbank law and that the reichsmark sh all reta in the mint p a rity de fin ed in the German coinage law of August 30, 1924. This provision corresponds to the provision in the Young Plan settlement accepted hy a l l of the other cred itor powers. I t was not f e l t that the United States was ju s t ifie d in demanding p r e fe r e n tia l treatment in th is respect. The Secretary o f the Treasury w i l l not, o f course, execute any such agreement u n til the Young Plan has form ally come into e ff e c t , thus g iv in g assurance that the whole reparations question is , in a l l human p ro b a b ility , f in a lly liqu idated. Uhat the proposed agreement does in so fa r as the United States is concerned is to provide fo r a fin a l liq u id a tio n o f her claims against Germany. to your judgment. I fe e l confident that i t w i l l commend i t s e l f TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, ¡■¿OR:iIKO- PAPERS, TUESDAY, .MARCH 11, 1930. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasuryc e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness, Series TD-1930 , 3-J- per cent, dated March 15, 1930, maturing December 15, 1930, closed at the close o f business on March 8 , 1930. Reports received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g , which was fo r $450,000,000, or thereabouts, to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $1,291,000,000. Of these subscriptions, $66,629,500 represent subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1930, maturing March 15, 1930, were tendered in payment, a l l o f which were a llo t t e d in f u l l , Allotments on cash subscriptions were made as fo llo w s: A ll sub scription s in amounts not exceeding $1 ,0 0 0 fo r any one subscriber were a llo t t e d in f u l l . Subscriptions in amounts over $1,000 but not exceeding $50,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo t t e d 80 per cent, but not less than $1 ,0 0 0 fo r any one subscriber; subscriptions in amounts over $50,000 but not exceeding $500,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d 60 per cent, but not less than $40,000 fo r any one subscriber; subscriptions in amounts over $500,000 but not exceeding $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d 50 per cent, but not less than $300,000 fo r any one subscriber; and subscriptions in amounts over $1 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 fo r any one subscriber were a llo t t e d 20 per cent, but not le s s than $500,000 fo r any one subscriber. l^orther d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments by Federal Reserve D is tric ts w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks, FOR I MODI ATE RELEASE, Thursday, March 13, 1930 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon to-day announced that the to ta l amount o f subscription s received fo r the issue o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebted ness, S eries TD-1930, 3^ per centj dated March 15, 1930, maturing December 15, 1930, was $1,290,990,000i The to ta l amount o f subscrip tions a llo t t e d was $483,841,000, o f which $6$,481,500 represents a l l o t ments on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TM-1930 were tendered in payment. A ll o f such exchange sub scription s were a llo tte d in f u l l , while allotm ents on other subscriptions were ma.de on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotments were divided among the several Federal Reserve D is tric ts and the Treasury as follow s: Federal Reserve D is tr ic t: Total Subscription s Received: Boston Few York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St, Louis Minneapolis Kansas C ity Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ Total Total Subscription s A llo tte d : 80,588,500 613,192,500 88.843.500 54.626.500 58.278.000 57.478.000 98.116.500 14.116.000 6,850,500 17,849 ;,000 39 ..295,500 161,STS,000 ________85,500 27 ,427 ,500 184 ,840 ,500 35 ,520 ,000 25 ,313 ,000 35 ,067 ,500 34 ,692 .500 55 ,976 ,500 9 ,523 ,500 4 ,634 ,500 7 .656'.500 22 ,89‘ 8 ,000 40 ,815 ,000 82 ,000 $ 1,290,990,000 $ 483,841,000 TREASURY DEPARTMENT For immediate relea se, March 15, 1930. Secretary Mellon announced today that the Committee composed o f the Attorney General, the Secretary o f the Treasury, and the Secretary o f War, which was designated hy Congress to recommend a lo ca tio n fo r the f i r s t n arcotic farm, would recommend a s it e near Lexington, K y ., fo r this purpose. Necessary steps w ill he taken to submit an estimate fo r appropriation to the present Congress looking to the purchase o f the s it e recommended. $53PESaaY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS,' SUERAI, MARCH 16, 1930. . Secretary Mellon yesterday made the fo llo w in g statemenlTtîtir- r e f e r e e /to the fin a l settlement fo r the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, o f the tax l i a b i l i t i e s of the United States Steel Corporation. The Treasury is closin g out f in a lly the tax l i a b i l i t i e s o f the United States Steel Corporation fo r the years 1918, 1919, and 1920. This is a fin a l s e t t le ment of a l l the war taxes o f the Steel Corporation. The case has been handled by a special committee o f thè best experts in the Treasury and most c a re fu lly examined and reviewed. A fte r the Treasury had reached i t s decision, the case was forwarded to the Joint Committee on In tern al Revenue Taxation o f the Congress and has been explained in d e ta il to i t . In addition, a thorough study and consideration has been given the case by the S ta ff o f tax experts o f the Congressional Joint Committee. Neither that Com mittee nor i t s S ta ff of experts has any c r itic is m to make o f the proposed s e t t le ment. In considering the case,we should not permit i t s size to a ffe c t our judgment. The only question to be determined is what did the Steel Corporation owe the Government on account o f taxes under the laws enacted by Congress. This the Bureau o f In tern al Revenue has determined a fte r the most painstaking and thorough consideration. The amounts involved are n ecessarily la rg e since the Steel Corporation paid about 8$ o f a l l the taxes paid by corporations during the war years, and fo r the year 1918, paid 56$ of i t s income to the Federal Government in taxes,“' Under the fin a l determination, the Federal Government is a ctu ally reta in in g about $8,000,000 in addition to the taxes o r ig in a lly paid by the corporation. a result o f intervening additional payments, however, the fin a l adjustment now shows an actual overpayment fo r the three years of approximately $2 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 in As p rin cip a l and $11,300,000 in in te re s t. The taxpayer had "brought suit in. court fo r the recovery of about $130,000,000 (in clu d in g p rin cip a l and in te r e s t ). As a resu lt o f the fin a l settlem ent, in an amount of less than $33,000,000, th is su it is "being dismissed. I t has been suggested that the case should be tr ie d out in court* As I have repeatedly stated, i f we should in s is t upon a t r i a l in court o f controversial issues in tax cases, we would merely be tra n sferrin g the adm inistration of the tax laws from the Treasury to the courts. An income tax system susceptible o f adm inistration only by the courts must n ecessarily break down. Furthermore, l it ig a t io n in th is pa rticu la r case w ill merely resu lt in adding tremendously to the in te re s t charges and in the recovery o f a much la rg er p rin cip a l amount by the corporation. The amount o f the present settlement represents the very minimum to which the corporation is le g a lly e n title d . Were i t not fo r i t s desire to close the case without prolonged l it ig a t io n , and fo r i t s very f a i r and *open—minded a ttitu de toward the Government, the case would not now be closed upon as favorable a basis to the Government. I f a i l to see any basis fo r c r it ic iz in g the proposed action o f the Treasury. The case has been handled by the best experts in the Treasury. I t has been ex amined c a re fu lly by the S ta ff o f the Congressional Joint Committee and reviewed by the Joint Committee i t s e l f . The overpayment is admitted. Sound business judgment and good administration demand that we return the amount promptly. A tax settlement cannot be understood by a consideration only o f misleading and inaccurate statements made fo r partisan purposes. We should not permit p o lit ic s to become in je c te d into the administration o f our tax laws. The making o f refunds is but a necessary part o f the administration o f our tax laws. Our revenue c o lle c tin g system is based upon the fundamental p rin c ip le - 3 » that the taxpayer must pay p rio r to an audit* Ah audit almost in e v ita b ly , in a complicated case, shows that he has paid too l i t t l e or too much* I f he owes an additional amount, steps are promptly taken to compel him to pay. he has overpaid, the amount o f the overpayment should he refunded promptly* ask fo r only the amount of taxes le g a lly due the Government. If We In th is case the. en tire refund is based upon and is s t r i c t l y allowable under fin a l decisions o f the courts and the Board of Tax Appeals. THFASUHY DUPAHT^TT FOB I « « , SUNDAY MOUSING- PAPPUS, MAHpH H b f 1930/ Statement "by Secretary Mellon regaVdmJpptlTS "presAffc status o f the governmental, b u ildin g program. A cceleratin g i t s a c t iv it ie s in lin e with President Hoover’ s policj^ o f increased construction as a means o f r e lie v in g unemployment, the Treasury Department has mapped out a program fo r putting under way th is year $92,000,000 worth o f public buildings in addition to the $40,000*000 now under construction* Prompt passage o f the K e y e s -F llio tt public bu ilding b i l l by the Senate would enable the Department to speed up i t s plans much more ra p id ly than at present besides making a va ila b le fo r th is and other years an increased sum o f money. The contracts that have been or are to be awarded th is year cover every section o f the country with the structures ranging in size from v illa g e p o s to ffic e s to the enormous $14,000,000 bu ilding to be erected in Chicago. This w i l l be the la rg est p o s to ffic e bu ildin g in the World. This program w i l l a ffo rd employment not only fo r many thousands o f men in the actual bu ilding construction but fo r many other thousands in the quarries and fa c to rie s . Besides the Chicago bu ildin g, other mammoth structures, the con tra cts fo r which w i l l be l e t th is year, include a six-and-one-half m il lio n d o lla r structure in Pittsburgh; a 21-story s ix -m illio n d o lla r struc ture in Boston, and a $3,300,000 bu ilding which is to r is e on the present s ite o f the fed era l bu ilding in Baltimore. Leaving out o f the equation the $40,000,000 expenditure which w i l l be expedited by the passage o f the K e y e s -E llio tt b i l l fo r th is calendar - 2 - year, $10,000,000 worth of p ro jec ts are to go on the market hy June, and approximately $35,000,000 worth between that time and October 1st. A ll o f th is projected work is outside the D is tric t of Columbia, where n early $30,000,000 in fed era l construction is under Way with an additional $10,000,000 to be put under way th is year under the KeyesE llio t t B i l l , beginning construction on the In te rs ta te Commerce and Pub l i c Health Service bu ildings, and the remodeling o f the State, War and Wavy Building to make i t conform to the architectu re o f the Treasury De partment Building so that the White House w i l l be flanked by two sim ilar structures as Congress o r ig in a lly intended. Buildings fo r which contracts ha,ve been awarded th is year include a $1,147,338 Marine Hospital in San Francisco; a m illio n d o lla r fed era l bu ilding in Scranton, Pa.; a $900,000 fed era l building at Memphis, Tenn.; a $585,000 Immigration Station at S eattle; an $830,000 bu ildin g at Denver, and smaller structures at Honolulu, McMinnville, Tenn., R u sh ville, Ind.* and Waynesburg and Tyrone, Pa. Bids are now in fo r buildings in East Chicago, In d ., .Pullman, Wash%* and S te rlin g , C o lo ., and tenders have been asked fo r structures in M il waukee, Ottawa, 111., P r ic e , Utah, and S co ttsb lu ff, Nebraska. Treasury Department plans as now outlined c a ll fo r the award o f con tra cts during th is year fo r other new fe d e ra l building p ro jec ts as fo llo w s Massachusetts......... .Boston, 2 buildings - Federal o ffic e building and Immigration Station. Worcester; Low ell; P a ll River and Framingham. K a n sa s..................... .W ichita and Junction C ity. „ O h i o . . . . . . . . . .............Toledo, and Marine H ospital at Cleveland. New Y o rk ... . . . . . . . . . . Assay O ffic e ; Parcel. Post and Government Warehouse in Manhattan. Brooklyn, superstructure. P ee k sk ill and White Plain s. - 3 New Jersey.................... Red Bank and Passaic. W isconsin................. . *Racine and Marshfield. Louisiana........... ......... New Orleans, 2 bu ildin gs - Marine Hospital and a Quarantine Station. Bogalusa. V irg in ia .................... .Lynchburg; Roanoke; Alexandria and Buena Vista. North C arolin a.. . . . . . . Greensboro and Lenoir. West V ir g in ia ............. .Morgantown and Parkersburg. Oklahoma.......................Oklahoma C ity and Tulsa, G eorgia..................... .. Savannah. Alabama......................... S h e ffie ld and Union Springs. M is s o u r i..,.,............... Kansas C ity and Sedalia. A r iz o n a ...................... Prescott and San Luis. Washington............. ... S e a t t le , Federal O ffic e Building. Blaine, Inspection Station. Michigan....................... Benton Harbor and F lin t . Connecticut..................New London, Coast Guard Academy. Indiana......................... L a fa yette. Tennessee..................... Kingsport. Iow a.............. ...............iowa City.. New Hampshire..............Hanover, Vermont......................... .Highgate Springs, Inspection Station. .. Bellows F a lls . Oregon..........................Klamath F a lls . Texas.............. ..............Galveston, Marine H ospital. Minnesota..................... South St. Paul. South Dakota................ V erm illibn . North Dakota....... . . . . . S t . Johns, Inspection Station. U t a h . O g d e n . W yom in g..................... Casper. - 4 New Mexico** . . . . . . . * . . Albuquerque, I d a h o . . pampa. Montana*• * . * . . * * . . * . i . Havre* Rhode Is la n d .< * „ * ..,* * .Pawtucket. C a liforn ia* San Bernardino* Scrath Car-0lina*.. *.... *.* Spat*tail sburg. C o l o r a d o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canon C ity. Arkansas.. . . . . . . . . . . . .Eldorado. .M ississippi,.,, • • « •-»-*. .Greenwood. M a in e .............. ... ...K ou lto n , Inspection Station. This l i s t o f buildings does not include p rojects that may be se le c te d under the authorization o f $115,000,000 fo r the country at la rge included in the K e y e s -E llio tt B i l l , and a ft e r the passage o f that b i l l i t w i l l be possible to expedite the construction o f the federal* buildings at Chicago, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, Portland, Ore., Hartford, and S p rin gfie ld , 111., in volvin g a to ta l o f approximately $30,000,000; be sides ten ( 1 0 ) other p ro jec ts yet to be determined. TREASURY DEPARTMENT POR RELEASE,MORNING PAPERS TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1930. REMARKS OF A. W. MELLON SECRETARY OP THE TREASURY at a dinner at the PITTSBURGH GOLF CLUB PITTSBURGH, MARCH 2k, 1930. Notes For f u l l text of speech see Subject F ile ; Secretary’ s Speeches. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Monday, A p ril 7, 1930, STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury gives notice that tenders are invited fo r Treasury h i l l s to the amount o f $50,000,000, or thereabouts« The Treasuxy h i l l s w i l l he sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders* Tenders w i ll he received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o*clock P. M*, Eastern Standard time, on .April 1 1 , 1930* Tenders w i ll not he received at the Treasury Department, Washington* The Treasury h i l l s w ill he dated A p ril 15, 1930, and w i l l mature on July 14, 1930, and on the maturity date the face amount w i l l he payable with out interest* They w ill he issued in hearer form only, and in amounts or de nominations o f $1 , 000, $10 , 000, and $100,000 (maturity vlau e)* I t is urged that tenders he made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l he supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches xpon application therefor* No tender fo r an amount le s s than $1,000 w i l l he considered* tender must he in multiples o f $1,000* Each The price offered must he expressed on the basis o f 100, with not more than three decimal places, e. g*, 99*125* Fractions must not he used* Tenders w i ll he accepted without cash deposit from incoiporated hanks and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment securities* Tenders from others must he accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent o f the face amount o f Treasury h i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guarantee o f payment by an incorporated hank or trust company. - 2 - Immediately a ft e r the closing hour fo r receipt of tenders on A p ril 11, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or “branches thereof up to the closing hour w i ll “be opened and public announcement o f the acceptable prices w i ll fo llo w as soon as p o ssible th ereafter, probably on the follow in g morning. The Secretary of the Treasury erpressly reserves the right to re je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a llo t le s s than the amount applied fo r, and his action in any such respect sh a ll be fin a l# Those sub m itting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance or rejectio n thereof# Pay ment at the price offered fo r Treasury b i l l s a llo tte d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a v a ila b le funds on A p ril 15, 1930# The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be exespt, both as to p rin c ip a l and interest (d is count), from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes# The amount o f discount at which the Treasury b i l l s are o rig in a lly sold by the United States sh a ll be considered as interest fo r tax exemption purposes# Department Circular 418, dated November 22, 1929, and this notice as issued by the Secretaxy of the Treasury, prescribe the terms o f the Tre&suiy b i l l s and govern the conditions o f th e ir issue# Copies o f the c irc u la r may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch thereof# 3 e>& TREASURY DSPARTMSH’T 'POE RRLSASE-y A?T,ERNOOF PAPERS, FSPInTESPAY, APRIL 9, 1S30. STATEMENT! 1 OP SECRETARY MELLON The examination of passengers' baggage at the docks in Greater Hew York has at a l l times given the Treasury Department considerable concern and has oeen the object o f c ritic is m fo r many years* The Commissioner o f Customs, with my complete endorsement, is earnestly endeavoring to improve the service. In furtherance o f h is e ffo r t s , I have secored the formation o f a Committee o f tw en ty-five representative Few Yorkers o aco i_i an advisory capacity, in conjunction with the steamship companies, the C ollector of the Port and the Surveyor o f the Port. tfoods has consented to act as Chairman of th is Committee. Colonel Arthur With the excep tion of a few who are unavoidably absent, the members o f th is Committee are meeting with me today at the Bankers Club^for |jumch~and fo r the i n i t i a l meeting which w i l l fo llo w . At th is meeting the Committee w i l l be informed concerning the problems which face tne Customs a u th o rities and the steamship companies. The • Committee w i l l be asked to study and analyse the whole situ a tion and the o ff ic ia ls o f the Treasury w i l l be prepared to g iv e information and assistance in order to f a c i l i t a t e the work. I am confident that the advice thus se cured w ill be of great assistance to the Treasury in i t s endeavor to render better service to the public. c itiz e n s a rrivin g home from tra vel abroad on account o f business, health or pleasure have a rig h t to courteous treatment at the hands o f Customs o ffic ia ls w hile undergoing the necessary fo rm a litie s o f passing through the 3 - Customs. 2 - At the same time Customs o f f i c i a l s are, o f course, e n title d to an equal decree o f consideration on the part o f the tra v e lin g public; and furthermore, we must see that strangers entering our country shall receive an impression o f "both e ffic ie n c y and good manners* In recent 3/ears the d i f f ic u lt i e s o f the situ ation have been aggravated as a resu.lt of great increase in tra v e l, without corresponding reorganization of procedure. These matters can be b e tte r adjusted with the advice and assistance o f p u b lic -s p irite d c itiz e n s , a l l o f whom have entered th is port many times; and so, in order to secure th e ir help, I have asked the members o f the Committee to meet today and discuss these questions. \ TRSAS U II DEPARTMENT POR RELEASE, MQRH2TG PAPERS, • SATURDAY, APRIL 12, 1930. Statement by Secretary Mellon. TLe Secretary/ of the Treasury announced to~day that the tenders fo r ¿50,000,000, or thereabouts, o f ninety-day Treasury B ills Which were o ffe re d on A p ril 7th, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on A p ril 11th, The to ta l amount applied fo r was $132,377,000. The highest bin made was 99.315, equivalent to an in te re s t rate o f about 2f per cent on an annual b asis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.250, equivalent to an in te re s t rate of 3 per cent on an annual basis. Tne to ta l amount o f bids accepted was $51,316,000. p rice o f Treasury B il l s to be issued is 99.267. The average The average annual rate* 6n a bank discount basis is about 2.93 per cent. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Tuesday, A p r il 15, 1930 TREASURY DEPARTMENT The Secretary o f the Treasury made the fo llo w in g announcement : Final steps were taken today in connection with the fund ing o f the indebtedness o f the French Republic to the United States, Mr# Paul Claudel, Ambassador Extraordinary and P len ip o ten tia ry of France at Washington, and Mr. Robert Lacoufc-Gayet, Financial Attache to the French Bnbassy in Washington, d e liv e re d to the Treasury gold bonds o f the Government o f 'the French Republic in the p rin cip a l amount o f $4,025,000,000, receivin g in exchange the o rig in a l o b liga tion s given by th e ir government in connection with cash advances made by the Secretary o f the Treasury and surplus war m aterial sold on c re d it by the United States Liqu idation Commission (War Department) in the aggregate p rin cip al amount o f $3,340,129,356.83# Of the gold bonds d elivered to the Treasury, Eos. 1 to 4 in the aggregate p rin cip al amount o f $125,000,000, having been paid by the French Government, were marked ’’Paid11 and returned to the French Ambassador. The Act approving the French settlement was signed by the President on December 18, 1929. The debt settlement has lik e wise been approved by the French Government. TO BE RELEASED UPON APPEARANCE BEFORE THE COMMITTEE Oil INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATEMENT BY OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ON TEE BILL (E. R.' 1120*+) TO REGULATE TEE ENTRY uF PERSONS INTO THE UNITED STATES, TO ESTABLISH A BORDER PATROL IN THE COAST GUARD, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen o f the Committee: The B ill (H.R. 1120^) which you now have under consideration ca rries out, in the opinion o f the Treasury, the recommendations submitted in the l e t t e r o f the Secretary o f the Treasury to the President, which was trans m itted in the P r e s id e n ts Message to the Congress on January lHth o f this year (House Document 2^2, f i s t Congress, 2nd Session). The S ecretary’ s le t t e r states b r ie fly and succinctly the basis o f it s recommendations fo r the creation o f a U n ified Border P a tro l. I t is as fo llo w s: ,TMr. President: The Treasury has been considering fo r some time the creation o f a u n ifie d border p a tro l, in order that the execution o f the customs, immigration, p roh ib ition , and other laws regu latin g or p roh ib itin g the entry into the United States o f persons and merchandise may be made more e ff e c t iv e . The fo llo w in g recommendations are submitted fo r your consideration and transmission to the Congress i f you approve: (1) The entry into the United States o f a l l persons should be proh ibited except at points o f entry designated by the President. (2) The present number o f points o f entry should be increased s u ffic ie n t ly to permit uninterrupted and unhampered intercourse with our neighboring countries over established and customary routes. (3) A u n ifie d border p a tro l should be created to p a tro l the border and prevent i l l e g a l entry 2 (4) The u n ifie d border p a tro l should he part o f the Coast Guard* A s p e c ific statutory p roh ib ition of entry in to the United States, o f e ith e r a lien s or c itiz e n s , in any. manner and w ith or without merchandise, except at designated points, is essen tia l as a basis i f the border p a tro l is to function e ff ic ie n t ly , since i t w i l l give the p a tro l a p la in and simple ra le to enforce, and r e lie v e them o f any n ecessity o f in te rp retin g and applying the customs, immigration, and other laws. Customs, immigration, quarantine, and other o ffic e r s w ill be stationed at the designated points o f entry, and the adm inistration o f the laws at these points should remain, o f course, under the ju ris d ic tio n o f the present services. The points o f entry should be designated by the President, ju st as ports o f entry arenow designated. Thej should be established at the boundary in te rsec tio n o f a l l established and customary routes and wherever intercouse with our neighboring countries ju s t ifie s . P le x ib i l i t y is essen tia l in order to permit an increase in the points o f entry conformably with the growth o f commerce and tra v e l and in order to meet seasonal n ecessities and constantly changing conditions. There should be a substantial increase, rather than a decrease, in the present number o f customs and immigration station s. I t is b elieved that the proposed plan w i l l promote m aterially the convenience o f the tra v e lin g pu blic, as w ell as r e lie v e those tra v e lin g on inland highways from inspection. To-day, gen erally speaking, tra vele rs may enter the United States anywhere but must report at a customhouse, which may w ell be e n tire ly out o f th e ir lin e o f tra v e l, and declare and enter th e ir merchandise. Moreover, our present p a tro l must n ecessarily be maintained on in te r io r roads and not along the border, with the consequent n ecessity o f stopping - 3 ~ veh icles and pedestrians who may never have l e f t the country. Adequate provision should, o f course, be made by regu lation so as to meet the needs o f farmers and others whose property extends across the border or who are liv in g along the border. The u n ified border p a tro l should be charged with the enforce ment o f the statutory p roh ib ition - that is , i t should be charged with the duty o f guarding the border between the designated points and preventing entry o f a l l persons and merchandise, over land and water borders, except at the points o f entry sp ecified , where the usual customs, immigration, quarantine, and other o ffic e r s w ill be stationed. The proposed u n ifie d border p a tro l w i l l replace i/he p a tro ls now maintained by both the Customs Service and the Immigration Service on our Mexican and Canadian boundaries, and w i l l cover t^ie same t e r r it o r y as those p a tro ls, thus complementing the work o f the Coast Guard on the maritime boundaries, elim inating duplication o f effo rt,c o n cen tra tin g re s p o n s ib ility fo r the p rotectio n o f a l l our borders, and bringing about a more e ffe c t iv e coordination o f the work. Prelim inary surveys have established the p r a c tic a b ilit y o f the plan. An actual physical examination o f our e n tire border, however, w i l l be necessary p r io r to the fin a l designation o f points o f entry or the clo sin g o f t r a ils and untraveled roads. The work must be done in harmonious cooperation with our neighboring countries and th e ir consent obtained as a matter o f courtesy. I t is b elieved that at le a s t s ix months w i ll oe required before the new border p a tro l can be organized and the prelim inary work completed. The cost o f maintaining the u n ifie d border p a tro l w i l l exceed the present cost o f maintaining our customs and immigration p a tro ls, and 3/ - H o d d iti nal immigration and customs stations w i l l "be required. Surveys upon which estimates o f the increased cost can he boned are under way and should soon he comifLeted* Very sin cerely, A4 Wi Mellon, Secretary o f the Treasury. The President, The White House, January 13, 1930•" - 5 ~ The proposed le g is la t io n is not s t r i c t l y a p roh ib ition measure. Rather, i t is proper prim arily to improve the enforcement o f the customs, immigration, and other laws regu latin g the entry o f persons and property into the United States. At present, there are two separate border p a tro ls, one in the Immigration Service and one in the Customs S ervice. a c t iv it ie s are not coordinated. Their The functions o f each are directed, and properly so at the present time, in the in te rests o f i t s p a rticu la r ser v ic e . Each p a trol is engaged in enforcing a very complicated body o f laws. The pending b i l l proposes to create a U n ified Border P a tro l, which w ill enforce a very simple rule o f law — Myou cannot enter the United States except at one o f the designated points o f e n try .'* Under the e x is tin g law a c it iz e n o f the United States may cross the boundary anywhere, and need not report h is entry unless he has merchandise. An a lie n coming into the country, except at an immigration sta tion in accordance with regulations, is subject to arrest and deportation. A v e h icle may cross the boundary anywhere, but, whether or not i t ca rries merchandise, must report to the nearest custom house. in by pedestrians must also be reported. Merchandise brought The present regulations governing entry o f persons and merchandise by a ir c r a ft w i l l not be a ffe c te d by the b ill. The new plan w i l l not be a nuisance to tra v e le rs and a burden on le g itim a te in tern ational intercourse. Qjiite the contrary, i t should provo a convenience to the tra v e lin g public by g iv in g them service at the actual point o f entry. An adequate number o f points o f entry w i l l be maintained, at which w i l l be stationed customs, immigration, public health, agricu ltu re, and other o ffic e r s to administer the various laws applicable to entry into the country. Supervision and inspection o f veh icles, pedestrians, and merchandise w ill "begin and end at the border, which is the lo g ic a l place. There w i l l no longer be the l i a b i l i t y to interru ption o f tra v e l on in te r io r roads by the p a tro l now maintained there. At the present time persons and veh icles that are several m iles from the boundary and may never have been out o f the country are subjected to th is annoyance in the b e l i e f that they may have entered the United States without compliance w ith the law. The concentration o f atten tion on the border w i l l also have .the resu lt o f elim inating the e v ils which have arisen out o f the attempts to detect smuggling on in te r io r roads. Examination o f persons and property at the designated border crossings can be ca refu l, thorough, and certain . In the very nature o f things the accomplishment o f th is end by scattered in te r io r p a tro ls is almost an impossible task, and i t is not surprising that errors and misjudgnents o f those o ffic e r s have occasion ally had unfortunate consequences, and that there have been many p rotests against the working o f such a d i f f i c u l t and uncertain method o f regu latin g entry in to the country. One o f the essen tia ls o f an e ffe c t iv e Border P a tro l is that i t be organized upon a m ilita r y basis, w ith an en listed and commissioned personnel, and with m ilita ry tra in in g and d is c ip lin e . I t nay be admitted that i t is d i f f i c u l t to place a U n ified Border P a tro l l o g ic a lly and properly in any one o f the Executive Departments or Establishments. A fte r very thorough consideration, the Treasury is o f the opinion that a U n ified Border P a trol may best be established as a unit o f the Coast Guard. th eless, i t should be organized and maintained as organ ization. Never d is tin c tly separate The Coast Guard has other duties even more important than the prevention o f smuggling on our land borders. In the performance o f these functions, the Coast Guard has established an enviable reputation. - 7 - P a tr o llin g our land borders is e s s e n tia lly a p o lic e function. The Coast Guard proper is a naval organization charged w ith the duty o f p rotectin g l i f e at sea and enforcing on our ocean boundaries the laws o f the United States. We do not propose to make policemen o f our s a ilo rs . But we do want to a v a il ourselves o f th e ir cen tral organization* The proposed plan w i l l cost the government more than the present system in two ways — increased appropriations w i l l be required fo r the customs and immigration station s, and the cost o f the new p a tro l w i l l be grea ter than the combined cost o f the present p a tro ls . But we should obtain i n f i n i t e l y greater e ffic ie n c y , and an adm inistrative system adequate to meet present day conditions on our land borders. Surveys by the Bureau o f Customs and the Bureau o f Immigration in di cate that there w i l l be required 203 new customs stations and 9 new immi gra tion stations at points along the Mexican and Canadian borders where the present stations are too fa r apart fo r convenient entry. The estimate o f the Customs Bureau represents the maximum number o f necessary stations* While i t w i l l in p ra ctice be necessary to provide fo r the entry o f both persons and merchandise at most o f these points, i t does not fo llo w that both services must maintain an establishment at each. To do so at unim portant border crossings would be a useless du plication o f expenditure* Most o f the new customs station s can serve as immigration stations under the present p ra ctice o f having the customs inspector hold the o f f i c e (without pay) o f immigrant inspector, or vice versa. The establishment o f these stations w ill in volve an i n i t i a l expenditure fo r the erection o f buildings o f $2,520,000 by the Customs Service. Kb estimate fo r new buildings has been furnished us by the Immigration Bureau; however, the same bu ilding could house both services and the Customs estimate is probably roughly s u ffic ie n t to cover the needs o f both. The annual expenditures o f the two services would be increased, o f course, by the amount necessary to maintain and operate these station s. In the customs service th is would amount annually to $936,600 fo r sa la ries o f 446 new inspectors and $105,000 fo r heat, lig h t , and maintenance o f buildings, or an annual t o ta l o f $1,041,600. The Immigration Bureau estimates that the cost o f maintaining and operating i t s nine new stations would be $22,500 a year. The to t a l increase in the annual expenditures o f both services would thus be $1,064,100. A comparison o f the cost o f the present immigration and customs border p a tro ls w ith the estimated cost o f the proposed p atrol w i l l show t'. increase in annual appropriations necessary fo r that purpose. The present customs p a tro l expends fo r sa la ries and other expenses $2,045,946 annually. $1,868,440. The annual appropriations fo r the immigration p a trol are The to ta l fo r both p a tro ls is thus $3,914,386. A fte r the two-year period necessary to complete the establishment o f the proposed u n ifie d p a tro l the annual appropriation necessary fo r i t is estimated at $7,328,882. This is an increase over expenditures o f the present p a tro ls o f $3,414,496. I n i t i a l expenditures in the establishment o f the border p a tro l fo r barracks, tra in in g stations, airplanes, automobiles, horses, and other o rig in a l equipment, are estimated at $3,177,679. Two-thirds o f th is w ill be required the f i r s t year and one-third the second. Since the cost o f maintenance and operation may be cut in h a lf fo r the f i r s t year, the actual appropriations necessary w ill be? F irst year $5,782,896 Second year $8,388,108 Annually th e re a fte r $7,328,882 - 9 - as compared with $3,914,386 fo r both the present p a tro ls , Combin&ng these increased costs, we fin d that the t o ta l increase fo r a ll services a ft e r the plan is in operation w i l l be an annual sun o f $4,241,779, The to ta l o f the i n i t i a l costs o f establish in g the new plan, w ill be $5,697,679, to be required during the f i r s t two years. The increase in personnel o f the proposed border p a trol over that o f the present p a tro ls should not be given exaggerated weight. not proposed to set up a standing army on the borders. I t is Considering the s t r ic t e r control which w i l l be accomplished, only a reasonable increase o f personnel over the e x is tin g organizations i s required. The customs p a tro l now employs 722 men, and the immigration p a tro l 847 men, a to ta l o f 1569. The number o f men to be on border duty in the proposed u n ifie d p a tro l is estimated at 2495, an increase o f 924, In addition to the men on duty at the border, 230 o ffic e r s and men w i l l be required fo r general courts, supervision and tra in in g, and headquarters, as w ell as 51 c iv ilia n employees. In considering th is increase, i t should be remembered that the pro posed p a tro l is to maintain a continuous p a trol o f the border by operation in 8-hour s h ifts . The present organizations are compelled by th e ir small numbers to confine th e ir e ffo r t s la r g e ly to captures o f smugglers o f whose operations knowledge is obtained. The increase in men and money is moderate, to obtain the advantages o f a continuous preven tive p a tro l, as compared with a system o f coping with smugglers which does not e ff e c t iv e ly shut out contraband persons and property, which in volves needless trouble and bloodshed, and which has given ris e to widespread d is s a tis fa c tio n . TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, May 8, 1930. The Secretary o f the Treasury made today the fo llo w in g announcement: An agreement fo r the settlement o f the R e lie f indebtedness of the Government o f Austria to the United States was executed today by the Austrian M inister to the United States on beh alf o f h is Government and by the Secretary o f the Treasury with the approval of the President on beh alf o f the United States. The United States holds an o b lig a tio n o f the Government of Austria designated as Bond Uo. 1, R e lie f Series B o f 1920, in the p rin cip a l amount o f $24,055,708.92. The agreement provides that A u stria w i l l pay to the United States in liq u id a tio n o f th is indebted ness the sum o f $33,428,500 in tw en ty-five equal annual installm ents o f $1,337,140 each, beginning on the f i r s t day of January in each o f the years 1943 to 1967 in clu sive. The date o f the i n i t i a l payment is explained by the fa c t that the time o f payment o f the p rin cip a l and in te re s t o f the o rig in a l o b liga tio n o f A u stria was extended to 1943 under the authority o f the Lodge Resolution o f A p ril 6, 1922, in order to provide fo r our cooperation with the other r e l i e f cred itor governments in perm itting the flo t a t io n o f the Austrian Reconstruction Loan o f 1923. Subject to the rig h t o f the trustees o f the Reconstruc tion Loan to ob ject, A u stria is given the option o f liq u id a tin g her r e l i e f indebtedness by the fo llo w in g payments beginning January 1, 1929 f i v e installm ents o f $287,556 each; ten installm ents o f $460,093 each; and tw en ty-five installm ents o f $743,047 each, or a to ta l over the fo r t y years o f $24,614,885. The present value on a basis o f 5$ per annum o f the tw en ty-five payments o f $1,337,140 each, beginning January 1, 1943, is p r a c tic a lly the same as the present value on the same basis o f the payments provided fo r under the option. Austria has advised the United States that i t intends to exercise the option and has already made payments due under the agreement fo r January 1, 1929 and January 1, 1930, o f $287,556 each. The settlement compares favorably with the settlements made by the United States with the Governments o f Greece, I t a l y and Yugoslavia. The terms o f settlement agreed upon with the United States are the same as those o ffe r e d by A u stria and accepted by a l l o f i t s other r e l i e f cred itors, v iz : Denmark, Prance, Great B rita in , I t a ly , The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, May 8, 1930. THS AUSTRIAN LEGATION Upon the execution today o f the debt funding agreement between Austria and the United States, the Austrian M inister on beh alf o f h is Government expressed to the United States through the Secretary of the Treasury the sincere appreciation o f Austria fo r the fr ie n d ly s p ir it o f helpfulness shown by the United States in concluding th is arrangement which w i l l make a most favorable impression upon the public opinion o f Austria. The Austrian M inister fu rth er said, MI t is one of the most important steps in the long process of my country’ s fin a n cia l and economic reconstruction. Without the sympathetic understanding o f A u stria’ s in tr ic a te problems and the readiness to a s s is t, which were found in the United States, our e ffo r t s in rebuilding our h ea vily damaged country would have been fu tile . The agreement ju st signed paves the way fo r my Government to proceed towards i t s goal o f f u l l re h a b ilita tio n and the reesta b lish ment o f normal conditions in our country's national l i f e . "A u stria sin cerely appreciates the helping hand stretched out by i t s s is te r republic over the sea and th is fe e lin g o f gratitu de cannot f a i l to strengthen the most fr ie n d ly re la tio n s happily e x is t ing between our two cou n tries." TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, , Monday, May 12, 1930. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury gives notice that tenders are invited fo r Treasury B ills to the amount o f $100,000,000, or there abouts. The Treasury B ills w i l l be sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o ’ clock P. M., Eastern Standard time, on May 15, 1930. Tenders w i l l not be received a t the Treasury Depart ment, Washington. The Treasury B ills w i l l be dated May 19, 1930, and w ill mature on August 18, 1930, and on the maturity date the face amount w i l l be payable without in te rest. They w i l l be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $10,000, and $100,000 (maturity value). I t is urged that tenders be made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l be supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon application th erefor. No tender fo r an amount less than $1,000 w i l l be considered. Jiach tender must be in m ultiples o f $1,000. The price o ffe re d must be expressed on the basis o f 100, with not more than three decimal places, e*g., 99.125. Fractions must not be used. Tenders w i l l be accepted without cash deposit from incorporated banks and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers - in investment secu rities. 2- Tenders from others must be accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent o f the face amount o f Treasury B ills applied for, unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guarantee o f pay ment by an incorporated bank or trust company. Immediately a ft e r the closing hour fo r receipt o f tenders on May 15, 1930, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up to the closin g hour w i l l be opened and public announcement o f the acceptable prices w i l l fo llo w as soon as possible th erea fter, probably on the fo llow in g morning. The Secretary o f the Treasury expressly reserves the righ t to re je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a llo t less than the amount applied fo r , and his action in any such respect shall be fin a l. Those submitting tenders w i l l be adviaed o f the acceptance or rejection thereof. Payment at the p rice o ffered fo r Treasury B ills a llo tte d mast be made a t the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately available funds on toy 19, 1930. The Treasury B ills w ill be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and interest (discount), from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. The amount o f discount at which the Treasury B ills are o r ig in a lly sold by the United States shall be considered as in te rest fo r tax exemp tion purposes. Department Circular No. 418, dated November 22, 1929, and this notice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, prescribe the terms o f the Treasury B ills and govern the conditions o f th eir issuo. Copies o f the circular may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch thereof. TRM SURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS,' FRIDAY MORNING, MAY 16, 1930. SPEECH TO tBE DELIVERED BY UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY-MILLS AT THE ANNUAL DINNER MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ADVERTISING AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, D. C ., M Y 15, 1930. When a public o f f i c i a l is in v ite d to address a meeting of business men at th is p a rticu la r time, he is expected to discuss the business outlook. This is embarrassing, but natu ral, since every business man is v i t a l l y in terested in hearing what course events are lik e ly to take in the immediate fu tu re, and those in public posi tion s are presumed to speak with au th ority. Let me, th erefore, state at the outset that I am not a prophet and that when I accepted your courteous in v ita tio n I did so with the d is tin c t understanding that I should not indulge in any forecastin g. Once a year, at le a s t, I am obliged to do so in connection with the estimates o f future revenues o f the Government, I have no désiré- to go beyond my o f f i c i a l o b liga tion in th is respect and to enter the general f i e l d o f prophesying. Estimating the revenue is quite enough to s a tis fy my ambitions along these lin e s . At the present time we are unquestionably passing through one o f those depressions which, in spite o f a l l our advances in business and economic science, seem to recur p eriod ica lly.- We are a l l ¿M 7 - 2 - the more impressed and depressed because the yesterday was so ex tra o rd in a rily prosperous, and the sharpness of the contrast i s accentuated by the ra p id ity with which the change has come. B e in g human, we are in clin ed to pich the best year as the standard year and to compare e x is tin g business a c t iv it y w ith record rather than with average fig u res. Moreover, each business man in h is own in dividu al lin e o f business must, from business n ecessity, attempt to determine the l i k e l y course of h is business during the next few months. His in te rest is in the immediate future, and h is natural basis of comparison is the immediate past. There is thus a tendency to shorten the perspective, whereas a more correct appraisal o f the situ ation as a whole can only be obtained from a longer view. I t is from th is more detached standpoint that I would lik e to ta lk th is evening o f the economic prospects o f the people o f the United States. Our present experience, and fo r that matter, a l l past experience in the modern world, indicates that the machine cannot be made to function at f u l l speed a l l the time. somewhere along the lin e . P e r io d ic a lly a lack o f balance develops The whole fa b r ic is so c lo s e ly knit and interdependent that a general slowing up in e v ita b ly occurs u n til a readjustment has been e ffe c te d and the balance restored. I t is discouraging that th is should be so, and the day may come when we shall have so mastered our economic machine as to have i t under b e tte r con trol. But in the meanwhile i t i s w ell to remember that these - 3 - downswings do not wipe out the progress achieved during the forward movements, and that when the onward march is resumed once more we s ta rt, not from the old mark, but from the new. This is an i n f i n i t e l y important fa c t to us, who have progressed at such a remarkably rapid rate during recent years* I t is d i f f ic u lt to b e lie v e that the progress achieved w i l l not be consolidated and re sumed, fo r the basic fa c to rs which made i t possible are s t i l l there. I take i t that a nation may be said to be prosperous when the people, gen era lly speaking, are f u l l y employed at a r e la t iv e ly high ra te of remuneration which brings w ithin the purchasing range o f the average man or woman a constantly increasing l i s t o f goods and services. Such a condition presupposes on the one hand a high le v e l o f purchasing power, and on the other, high p ro d u ctivity with increased e ffic ie n c y in production and d istrib u tio n , r e fle c te d in r e la t iv e ly low p rices fo r a broad l i s t o f a r t ic le s , which includes not only n ec e s s itie s , but the luxuries demanded by the almost unlim ited desires o f human beings constantly aspiring to a higher standard o f liv in g . During the period which has recen tly witnessed such a remarkable quickening o f our economic l i f e and the attainment o f a standard in the s a tis fa c tio n o f human wants h ith erto unheard o f, these fa cto rs have been present. Estimates by the National Bureau of Economic Research fo r 1928 place our to ta l re a liz e d income at about $90,000,000,000, as compared with about $30,000,000,000 in 1909. This represents an increase in ¿km per cap ita income from $3^7 to $7^*9» ° r in income per individual g a in fu lly employed from $864 to $1920. Although adjustment fo r p ric e changes over the period would reduce the increases, i t would by no means elim inate them. I t is in te restin g to note that the remuneration o f employees, that is , s a la ries , wages, e t c ., are estimated to-day at about 57 p er cent o f th is t o t a l, as compared with about years ago. 51 per cent twenty Treasury s t a t is t ic s derived from corporation and in dividu al income tax returns r e fle c t the growth in national income which has taken place in recent years. For example, between 1922 and 1 9 2 S, a period during which important tax reductions were e ffe c te d , the net income tabulated from individu al returns increased from $2 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 to nearly $25*000,000,000, in s p ite o f Revenue Act revision s which elim inated more than three m illio n o f the smaller taxpayers; w hile net income o f a l l reportin g corporations increased from$&,300,000,000 to about $7 ,^ 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . Here, then, we have the fa c to r o f growing purchasing power, which is v a stly important not only from the standpoint o f what has been accomplished, but as poin tin g to p o s s ib ilit ie s in the way o f future development. In the second place, we have enormously expanded our national plant as expressed in terms o f estimated national wealth. Our national wealth to-day may be considered as w e ll in excess o f the $3 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 estimated by the Bureau o f the Census fo r 1922, which compares with the fig u re o f $1S6,000,000,000 in 1912. This fig u re includes the value o f land, structures and other improvements thereon, the equipment o f in du strial en terprises and farms, liv e s to c k , ra ilro a d and pu blic u t i l i t i e s , pipe lin e s , shipping, ir r ig a t io n enterprises, etc. 33» - 5 *■ What I have described as plant expansion has been accompanied by a sharp increase in the volume o f production, p rin c ip a lly o f manu factured goods. output in 197 i *1 1909 1929* Thus, taking the physical volume o f manufactured at 100, production increased to about 175 in 1927 and to la the la t t e r part o f th is period the increased e ffic ie n c y in production resu lted in increased per ca p ita output o f those engaged in industry. Comparing 1919 and 1927 there was an increase o f more than Uo per cent in the output per in dividu al in manufacturing enter p rises, and o f 35 Per cent in manufacturing, mining, a gricu ltu ral and railw ay transportation combined. are even more strik in g ; 100 Comparisons fo r in dividu al industries The individu al output per hour increased nearly per cent in the automobile industry, about industry, and about 52 163 per cent in the t i r e per cent in s te e l works and r o llin g m ills , lin e s which have been conspicuously capable o f adapting mechanical refinements and organization improvements in th e ir processes. Here, then, we have a rapid increase in the already large* purchasing power o f 120 m illio n people; an improved and expanded plant; g rea ter e ffic ie n c y in production and d istrib u tio n , and as a resu lt an ever widening market fo r all3manner o f goods and services . p rosp erity. Here is a rea l basis fo r I t is w e ll to remember that thèse basic fa cto rs are s t i l l present and there is no reason why they should not contribute to- our progress in the future as they have in the past. We are the possessors o f a vast t e r r ito r y , rich in natural resources and populated with an en ergetic and in t e llig e n t people, con stitu tin g a tremendous economic u n it, fr e e from trade r e s tr ic tio n s , and with a market in which mass production and a demand fo r commodities sustained by a means to s a tis fy i t have gone hand in hand. Although the standards o f equipment o f the average man, whether fo r h is labor, h is comfort, h is cu ltu ral development, or his recreation, are adm ittedly high, ye t vast numbers in this country enjoy incom p le t e ly many even o f the n ecessities o f l i f e * This is a fa c t which at the same time o ffe r s an opportunity and a challenge to the business man to-day. C ertain ly one- o f the opportunities that confronts him is the opportunity by increased e ffic ie n c y , lower costs, and studied adaptation o f his products to market needs, so to diminish the p r ic e o f h is products as to render possible a wider d istrib u tio n fo r them. This is not incon sisten t w ith an expanding puftehasing power in the domestic market; fo r increased p rod u ctivity and increased e ffe c t iv e demand, experience has demonostrated, can go hand in hand. Given such a fundamentally favorable situ ation as ex ists in th is country, i t is ir r it a t in g and pu zzling to be confronted with p eriod ic depressions. They se#m somehow unnecessary. And yet to me the progress we have achieved in th is country, the marvel o f the present economic order, with the almost unlim ited promise which i t seems to hold out to the average man in the way o f m aterial betterment, are in fin it e ly more impressive than any temporary recession. With the economic world in balanc increased production and increased purchasing power seem to supplement each other so n atu rally that we accept the two phenomena as a matter o f course. But l e t any consider ¡able group o f people produce what is n 't wanted, or more than is wanted, l e t th e ir goods f a i l to fin d a market, and th e ir impaired * 81 3 * - 7 - purchasing power immediately a ffe c ts the market fo r goods produced by other groups. A n icely adjusted balance is disturbed, the movement spreads and almost before we know i t we are confronted with the phenomenon known as a business depression and the most b a fflin g o f problems. I t is only in times lik e these that we r e a liz e the in tr ic a c ie s o f the system and how necessary i t is to analyze and determine what are the c o n tro llin g and determining fo rc e s . When one considers what i t means to have a fr e e ly com petitive economic order, such as p re v a ils throughout most o f the world to-day, in which men engage fr e e ly in a wide v a rie ty o f sp e c ia lize d a c t iv it ie s fo r a money income, which is spent by them also qu ite fr e e ly upon a wide v a r ie ty o f commodities, and in response to frequ en tly unstable preferences, and when one appreciates the importance o f the psychological fa c to r and the tendency o f human beings to move a l l together in one d ire c tio n or the other at the same time, i t is easy to understand how complicated and susceptible is our whole economic structure. I t explains why p eriod ic depressions and readjustments seem almost to be in e v ita b le . Whether they can be e n tire ly elim inated is c e rta in ly questionable, but that they can be fu rth er m itigated is not too much to expect. A fte r a l l , there was a time when we:*were s a tis fie d with a banking and cred it system subject only to co rre c tiv e checks and balances that autom atically became operative only when unsound developments had ca rried us to periods o f c o s tly and pain fu l c ris e s . With the organization o f the Federal Reserve System and the consequent c e n tra liz a tio n o f re s p o n s ib ility fo r the supervision o f c red it developments, we made a great step forward. The Federal Reserve Act - 8 - has not only given added strength to our c red it structure, hut has provided us with a group o f o f f i c i a l s whose duty i t is to study changing business and cred it conditions in order that business and commerce may b en efit from an enlightened supervision o f banking and cred it developments* We have not ye t reached p e rfectio n in the use o f th is instrument, but X b e lie v e that a l l w ill admit that i t s creation was a step in the rig h t d irectio n and that i t has functioned, even in these ea rly years o f i t s existence, with untold b en efit to the country# The Federal Reserve System did not come into existence u n til a fte r many years o f in tensive study and work* The analogy is perhaps not quite leg itim a te, but i f a proper solu tion o f one o f the great economic problems has been found and su itable machinery has been evolved fo r dealing with one o f the important business fa cto rs, namely, that o f cre d it, is i t too much to hope that in ten sive study o f a l l o f the other complicated and in tr ic a te fa cto rs may y ie ld s im ila rly fr u it fu l results? The President has recen tly proposed that **The whole range o f our experience from th is boom and slump should be placed under accurate examination with a view to determination o f what can be done to achieve greater s t a b ilit y fo r the future, both in prevention and in remedy#*1 stru ctive suggestion* To me th is is a most con C ertain ly, i f there i s any hope o f maintaining balanced conditions in industry and trade as against haphazard adjustments on which we have in the main r e lie d in the past, that hope l i e s in the gathering o f accurate information, i t s carefu l analysis, the establishment o f fundamental p rin cip les, and a wide understanding o f those p rin cip les 7 - 9 - and fa c ts on the part o f in dividu als engaged in many lin e s o f business a c t iv it y . We have made such enormous strid es iii the gathering o f current business s t a t is t ic s , information can be so re a d ily , rapid ly, and widely diffused, that i t is not too much to hope that the business course o f the future may be charted by the lig h t o f adequate information and knowledge and in accordance with recognized ru les o f conduct, resu ltin g in grea ter sa fety to individu al in dustries, and in more assured s t a b ilit y in our economic l i f e . What has been accomplished in the course o f the la s t few months by c o lle c t iv e e ffo r t s in a comparatively lim ite d fie ld , with very rea l e ffe c t in taking up the se v e rity o f the present downswing, is a p retty f a i r sample o f the grea ter resu lts that can be accomplished i f the concerted e ffo r t s o f the nation can be in t e llig e n t ly directed to the maintenance o f economic s t a b ilit y * We might as w e ll understand, however, that no such goal is to be attained u n til there is not only in te llig e n t d ire c tio n but a very d e fin ite sense o f re s p o n s ib ility on the part o f a l l . Then, as now, there w i l l be no escape from the consequences o f ill-a d v is e d actions. Let me conclude as I began: I am not here to t e l l you whether business is going to be good, bad, or in d iffe r e n t in the next three or four months. But i t is not inappropriate at th is time to remind you how fa r we in the United States have tr a v e lle d along the economic highway in the la s t few years; that certa in d e fin ite fa cto rs contributed to our progress; that they are s t i l l a va ila b le ; and that while the road may temporarily run through a v a lle y , i t s t i l l stretches out before us holding in fin it e promise. S3 C (I T il |~ r% r~ K 11 r?— FOR. RELEASE, AFTERNOONj PAPERS , TREASURY DEPARTMENT THft&R|pK^,h93y A I L Address of Secretary A. W. Mellon to the Graduating Class o f the United States Coast Guard Academy Few London, Connecticut May 15, 1930 JBl I congratulate the members o f the Graduating Class on becoming o ffic e r s o f the United States Coast Guard. I t is a long and d i f f ic u lt course of tra in in g which you have successfully completed. But such a course is necessary i f a man is to be thoroughly tested and trained fo r the r e s p o n s ib ilitie s which he must face in carrying on the work o f the Coast Guard. That Service does not o ffe r an easy l i f e . But that, I know, is one of i t s advantages in your eyes, fo r no man worth w hile wants an easy l i f e when there is re a l work to be done in the world. The Coast Guard imposes a great v a rie ty of duties on i t s members* Nearly a ll of these duties are d i f f i c u l t and some, such as p a tr o llin g the coast to prevent smuggling,are fa r from pleasant. But the Coast Guard never f a i l s to carry out any duty imposed upon i t and prides i t s e l f on i t s readiness to face any emergency that may a ris e . The manner in which the. Coast Guard has always performed these duties makes o f i t a Service of which we may a l l be proud. I t s tra d itio n s go back to the very f i r s t days o f our h isto ry as a nation. I t is the oldest of a l l our sea-going fo rce s. It was organized during the administration o f President Washington when the f i r s t Congress passed a law creating a Revenue Cutter S ervice. The Continental Navy had been disbanded at the close of the Revolutionary War; and, in organizing the Treasury Department, Alexander Hamilton found no sea forces a va ila b le fo r the protection o f the coasts or the prevention of smuggling into the country. U n til the creation o f the Navy - 3 several years la t e r , the Revenue Cutter Service was the n ation ’ s only arm of defense on the sea; and subsequently, when the L ife-S a vin g Service was created, these two services were combined to form the Coast Guard, Coast Guard vessels have always been armed and during time of war have operated as part o f the Navy. They have rendered distinguished service in a l l the wars in which the country has been involved and in the World War played an important part, p a rtic u la rly in that v i t a l and successful operation o f transporting our troops abroad. In time o f peace the Coast Guard’ s duties are no le s s dangerous than in time o f war and each year are growing more d i f f ic u lt o f performance. One o f i t s functions is to p a trol the coasts during stormy weather in order to rescue ships and persons in d istress at sea. The performance of th is duty, as a l l o f us know, is hazardous in the extreme, in volvin g acts o f heroism which are looked upon by the Coast Guard as merely part of the day’ s routine. Last year there was not a sin gle day when the Service did not render some manner o f assistance to vessels or persons in d istress. And yet these deeds, often dangerous and even h eroic, are sometimes recorded in the newspapers with perhaps two or three lin e s , whereas some incident o f a more sensational nature in volvin g the Coast Guard is given prominence out o f a l l proportion to i t s re a l importance. This is no in d ication , however, that the country does not appreciate the great service which the Coast Guard is rendering. One recent evidence o f such appreciation is the generous appropriation which Congress has made in providing new and b etter bu ildings fo r the Academy here at New London. The present quarters are inadequate, but th is is a defect which w ill soon be remedied. The a rc h ite c ts ’ drawings fo r the new buildings are now nearing completion and i t is expected that at some time during the summer bids w i l l be asked fo r constructing these buildings« When completed, they w i l l provide improved f a c i l i t i e s fo r the train ing which the future o ffic e r s o f the Coast Guard w i l l re ceive here, and they w ill also serve to emphasize the importance which th is branch o f our national defense has assumed in the d a ily l i f e o f the nation. I t seems superfluous to comment on the value o f such a Service as the Coast Guard, not only as regards liv e s saved and property rescued but in it s humanitarian aspects. In i t s tra d itio n s and in i t s record of It has shown that i t w i l l fig h t hard when an enemy threatens and w i l l k i l l and destroy when necessary in time of war. But i t w i l l also fig h t equally hard against the greater odds o f wind and sea in order to save l i f e and to p rotect the nation against those who defy her laws and threaten her au thority in time o f peace. Of such a Service the nation can w ell be proud. In i t s d a ily l i f e the Coast Guard exem p lifies the q u a litie s of courage, lo y a lty and b e lie f that nothing must in te r fe r e with the performance o f duty. I know that the new o ffic e r s who are today entering the Service can be counted on to uphold the best tra d itio n s o f the Coast Guard. We are glad to have you as a part o f that old and famous organization and on behalf of the Treasury I wish to extend to you a most cord ial welcome and to wish a ll o f you happy and useful careers in the service o f your Government and the country. TREASURY DEPARTMENT DOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Friday* May 16, 1930, Statement by Acting Secretary M ill« A cting Secretary o f the Treasury M ills announced to-day that the tenders fo r $100,000,000, or thereabouts, o f Treasury B ills dated May 19th and maturing August 18th, which were o n e re d on May 12th, were opened at the Federal Eeserve Banks on May 15th. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $275,674,000, The highest hid made was 99.400, equivalent to an in te rest rate of aoout 2 3/8 per cent on an annual basis. The lowest hid ac cepted was 99,331, equivalent to an in te re s t rate o f about 2 5/8 per cent on an annual basis. accepted was $104,600,000. B ills to he issued i s 99.356, discount "basis is about 2 .5 4 The to ta l amount o f bids The average p rice of Treasury The average rate on a bank per cent. FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Saturday, June 7, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, an issue o f twelve month 2-7/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1931, dated and bearing in te re s t from June 16, 1930, and maturing June 15, 1931. The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $400,000,000, or there abouts. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , a t par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1930, maturing June 16, 1930, Subscriptions fo r which payment is to be tendered in c e r t i fic a te s o f indebtedness maturing June 16, 1930, w i l l be given preferred allotment up to $150,000,000. Bearer c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a t e s w i l l have two in te re s t coupons attached payable December 15, 1930, and June 15, 1931. These c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. About $550,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness and about $9 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 in in te re s t payments on the public debt become due and payable on June 16, 1930. The tex t o f the o f f i c i a l circ u la r fo llow s: -2 - The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the au th ority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te rest, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t i fic a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1931, dated and bearing in te re s t from June 16, 1930, payable June 15, 1931, with in te re s t a t the rate o f two and seven-eighths per cent per annum, payable on a semiannual basis. •Applications w i l l be received a t the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000* The c e r t ific a t e s w i l l have two in te re s t coupons attached, payable December 15, 1930, and June 15, 1931. The c e r t ific a t e s of said series sh a ll be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, from a l l taxation (except estate and inheritance taxes) now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, or by any lo c a l taxing authority. The c e r t ific a t e s o f this series r i l l be accepted a t par during such time and under such rules and regulations as sh all be prescribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity o f the c e r t ific a t e s . The c e r t ific a t e s of this series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w ill not bear the c ircu la tio n p r iv ile g e . The rig h t is reserved to r e je c t any subscription and to a l l o t less than the amount o f c e r t ific a t e s applied fo r and to close the subscriptions a t any time without n otice. The Secretary o f the Treasury also reserves the righ t to make allotment in f u l l upon application s fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotm ents upon, or to r e je c t , applications fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotm ents and allotm ents upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l he fin a l. A llo t ment notices w i l l he sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotm ent w i l l he p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in te re s t fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo t t e d must he made on or before June 16, 1930, or on la te r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue interim receipts pending d e liv e ry of the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l he permitted to make payment by c re d it fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d to i t fo r i t s e l f and it s customers up to any amount fo r which i t shall he q u a lifie d in excess o f ex istin g deposits, when so n o tifie d by the Federal Reserve Bank o f i t s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1930, maturing June 16, 1930, w i l l he accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s o f the series now o ffe re d which shall he subscribed fo r and a llo tte d , w ith an adjustment o f the in te rest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r . As fis c a l agents o f the United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make a l l o t ments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is t r ic ts . TREASURY DEPARTMSRT. POR RELEASE, AFTERROOR PAPERS, WEDNESDAY, JURE 11, 1930. REMARKS BY HOR, PERRY K. HEATH, Assistant Secretary o f the Treasury, Prelim inary to the showing o f the film “ THE RATIOR*S CAPITAL“ MI CHI GAR BARKERS ASSOCIATIOR, GRARD RAPIDS, MICHIGAR, June 11, 1930. coooOOOOoooo Mr. President and members of the Michigan Bankers Association, and guests: A clause in the Constitution o f the United States authorized the lo ca tio n and the "building o f a Capital fo r the nation, Leningrad and Canberra, A u stra lia , are the only other ca p ita ls which wore founded fo r th is express purpose. The f i r s t building commenced nnder the f i r s t public b u ildin g program o f the Government was the Capitol at Washington, Since then there have been bu ildings constructed in a l l states o f the Union, u n til now there are some 1400 Government-owned bu ildin gs. Most of these have been b u ilt haphazard, both as to architecture and public convenience, and have been b u ilt under separate b i l l s passed by Congress under the old lo g - r o llin g method. Public bu ildin g ceased in th is country in 1917 and in 1926 i t was appreciated that owing to the enormous growth o f the country and the pressing needs then evident, that a b u ild in g program conducted un der the old scheme o f things would prove e n t ir e ly f u t i l e . I t was then that Congress w isely adopted the present method o f bu ildin g our public bu ildings and, in the law approved May 25, 1926, directed that the Sec reta ry o f the Treasury and the Postmaster General should make a nation— wide survey and report back to Congress as to the public necessity. In February, 1927, th is report was sent to Congress, a llo c a tin g d istrib u tio n of $100,000,000 that had been authorized at the time the May B i l l was passed, and in d ica tin g that i t would require $361,000,000 at lea st to provide fo r a l l the needs of the country outside D is tr ic t of Columbia as o f that date. the - 2 - There were addition al authorizations made amounting to another $100,000,000 and to include also the proceeds of the sale o f the old bu ildin gs and grounds and i t was estimated that the to ta l amount a va ila b le would be $248,000,000, A report was sent to Congress ih February, 1929, in d i cating the allod atib n o f the en tire $248,000,000. About th is same time $50,000,0(36 was authorized to be expended fo r departmental bu ild ings in Washington and $25,000,000 fo r the acqu isitlori o f land fo r the purpose. These bu ildin g acts provided that expenditure o f th is huge sum should be under the d ire c tio n of the Secretary o f the Treasury and consequently the Supervising A rch itect*s O ffic e o f the Treasury Depart ment is in charge of the work and i t becomes an in te g ra l part of Treas ury a c t iv it y . While Secretary o f Commerce, President Hoover took a great in te r est in the development of the b u ildin g plans o f the Government and, a f te r he became President, he inaugurated le g is la t io n that would allow the expansion of the bu ildin g program to more n early comply with the needs o f the country, not only outside the D is t r ic t o f Columbia, but w ithin the D is t r ic t , and there has recen tly been passed what is known as the K e y e s -E llio tt B i l l which provides $115,000,000 a d d ition al fo r the Government program in the D is tr ic t of Columoia, and a lik e amount fo r the country at la rge. I t is not possible to l i s t the names o f those in public l i f e who have been responsible fo r the sentiment in Congress which culminated in th is le g is la tio n . T h irty years ago McKinley, Root, R oosevelt and T a ft, assisted by the constructive genius o f Senator McMillan of Michigan, were very la rg e ly responsible fo r the inauguration o f the work. Of la t e r years the President, Secretary Mellon, Senator Fernald, Senator Smoot, Congressman E l l i o t t and Congressman Cramton o f our own State, have carried on the work. We therefore now have a bu ildin g program authorized by Congress which contemplates the expenditure of $363,000,000 outside the Dis t r i c t , and $190,000,000 in the City o f Washington. The program is carried on through what is known as the Interdepartmental Committee, which is composed of an A ssistan t Secretary of the Treasury, an As sistan t Postmaster General, the Supervising A rch itect of the Treasury, • and a Secretary to the Committee. A ll p ro jec ts throughout the country in which postal a c t iv it ie s are housed, are passed on by th is Committee, In the ca.se of custom houses, quarantine station s, assay o ffic e s , appraisers1 stores, etc.*, as w e ll as courthouses, where there are no postal a c t iv it ie s , the Secretary o f the Treasury is in en tire charge. On January 1st o f th is year.we had $40,000,000 o f contracts on hand. Due to the extended program and the desire of the administra tion to place as much work as possible on the market th is year, we ex pect to have $80,000,000 of contracts in fo rce by the 1st of next Janu ary. To carry on th is enormous amount of work, the Supervising Archi t e c t ’ s O ffic e has a force o f over 200 men working on sketches and de signs, plans and contracts, and we are expanding th is fo rc e by one-third as ra p id ly as is possible under the C iv il Service rules. Before an individual p ro jec t is authorized by Congress, an estimate is made of the requirements and lim its of cost are set by the Secretary o f the Treasury. These p ro jec ts are lis t e d by installm ents and sent to Congress fo r s p e c ific authorization and appropriation. As soon as the appropriations are made, the s ite s are purchased in case the M l - 4 - Government does not own tiie s ite and, as soon as t i t l e has "been passed to the Government and approved by the Attornejr General, plans are made fo r the "building, sp e cifica tio n s are w ritten , "bids are asked fo r and the contract awarded. This process takes very much longer than some times seems necessary, "because of innumerable delays which cannot be obviated. To name a few, I might mention s ite loca tion disagreements in the various communities, flaw s in the t i t l e when s ite s have been decided, d if f ic u lt y in pleasing the various departments whose approval has to be obtained before plans can be completed, im portunities o f various producers and fa b rica to rs o f m aterials through th e ir Congressional delegation, and in terferen ces o f various kinds which are bound to occur in a governmental p ro jec t. Of course the greatest sin gle p roject under the d irectio n of the Secretary o f the Treasury i s the rebu ilding of Washington. As you know, the f i r s t Congress delegated the authority fo r the selection o f a s ite fo r the fe d e ra l c i t 3/ to George Washington and, assisted by Jefferson and Madison, he decided upon the present lo ca tio n o f the C apitol. This f i r s t commission chose a young french engineer, Major P ie rre Charles L fIn fa n t, a frie n d of Washington in the Continental Army, Y/ho set to work with en thusiasm and evolved the now famous L ’ Enfant plan fo r the fe d e ra l c ity . of L 1Enfant was fa m ilia r with the work/Lehotre as h is youth had been spent at V e r s a ille s , and you W ill observe the influence o f this greatest of landscape a rch itects in the plan being follov/ed today. The Capitol was commenced in 1793 and soon afterwards work began on the White House. In la t e r years several notable public buildings were constructed - the Treasury, the Patent O ffic e , and the D is tric t - 5 - Courthouse - as examples. A h a lf centuny ago the a u th o rities seemed to have been a ffe c te d by a sort o f a rch itectu ra l g it t e r s , and some of the m onstrosities s t i l l standing in Washington show what lack o f stan dards of taste can do in “b lig h tin g a b ea u tifu l plan. The World* s P a ir at Chicago seems to have brought about an archi tectu ra l renaissance in th is country and, in 1900, Burnham, McKim, St. Gaudens and Olnstead were c a lled together by President McKinley to dis cuss the Washington situ a tion , and the so -ca lled McMillan plan o f 1901 was evolved. Prom that tin e on Congress has gradually been educated to a sense o f the p o s s ib ilit ie s in Washington, as w ell as the n ecess itie s, and, under the new bu ildin g Act, the L 1Enfant Plan is being developedby the Secretary o f the Treasury, advised by a Board of Consultants com posed of some of the leading a rch itects o f the country. B r ie fly , the p rojects now in various stages of development include a grand development of the Mall which stretches from the Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial, As adjuncts to th is .g re a t government park, bordered as i t w i l l be by magnificent departmental bu ildin gs, w i l l be the expan sion of the Capitol grounds to the Union Station, the additions to the Senate and House O ffic e bu ildin gs, the new bu ildin g fo r the Supreme Court, the great Arlington Memorial Bridge, the new highway to Mount Ver non, and the drive from the Lincoln Memorial to the Great P a lls of the Potomac, The Grant on Park B i l l ju st passed which has been sponsored by Con gressman Cramton o f th is state, provides the means fo r a great develop ment of the d rives along the Potomac. The highway to Mount Vernon w ill soon be completed and, in a few years, there w i l l be a b ea u tifu l drive extending from Port Washington to the Great P a lls o f the Potomac, where - 6 - a bridge is to be b u ilt and another highway extending from there a l l the way to Mount Vernon. In addition to th is the le g is la tio n provides fo r the extension o f Rock Creek Park into Maryland, so that a l l the very lo v e ly country and great natural beauties o f the scenery in and around Washington w i l l be saved to the people fo r a l l time. The development of th is program w i l l run over a period o f possibly eigh t or ten years, but w ithin three or four years most o f i t w i l l have been accomplished, or w i l l be w e ll on the way. In a few years v is it o r s to Washington w i l l leave the Union Station which, as you know, i s a magnificent gateway to the c it y , step out into the station plaza, drive past the great bu ildin gs o f the Capitol group down a fe d e ra l avenue lin ed w ith the most magnificent arch itectu ra l composition to be found anywhere in the World; the outlines o f c la s s ic a l buildings r e fle c te d in pools and cascades, b ea u tifu l gardens on every side and shaded d rives, u n til they pass the Washington Monument and a rriv e at the Lincoln Memorial. years. I t s beauty seems to grow with the Prom the Memorial the great A rlin gton bridge leads you to the Tomb o f the Unknown Soldier and the la s t re s tin g place o f thousands o f the defenders of the land. Tlie people o f the country w i l l have a c a p ita l expressing and fu lf i l l i n g th e ir needs, which w i l l become the great shrine o f the Republic. To paraphrase two presidents, Washington w i l l express the soul o f America and stand as the symbol o f the nation. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOB RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Wednesday, June 11, 1930. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness* dated June 16, 1930, Series TJ-1931, 2-7/8 per cent, .maturing June 15, 1931, dlosed at the close of business on June 9, 1930. The reports received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g , which was fo r $400,000,000, or there abouts, to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $2,397,000,000. Of these subscriptions, about $265,000,000 represent subscriptions fo r which 4-7/8$ Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TJ-1930, maturing June 16, 1930, were tendered in payment, o f which about $150,000,000 were accepted. Allotments on other subscriptions were made as follows.: A l l cash subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $10,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo te d 50 per cen t* but not less than $500 on any one subscription; cash subscriptions in amounts over $10,000 but not exceeding $100,000 were a llo tte d 40 per cent., but not le s s than $5,000 on any one subscription; cash subscriptions in amounts o ver.$100,000 but not exceeding $1,000,000 were a llo t t e d 20 per cent, but not less than $40,000 on any one subscription; cash subscriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 but not exceeding $25,000,000 were a llo t t e d 10 per cent, but not le s s than $200,000 on any one subscription; and cash subscriptions in amounts over $25,000,000 were a llo t t e d 5 per cent, but not le s s than . $2,500*000 *on any one -subscript-ion. Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotm ents w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Friday, June 13, 1930, TREASURY DEPJffîTMEIfT Secretary Mellon to-day announced that the to ta l amount of subscriptions received fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness, Series TJ-1931, 2-7/8 per cent, dated Juno 16, 1930, maturing June 15, 1931, was $3,398,792,000. Jhe to ta l amount of subscriptions a llo tte d was $429,373,000, o f which $148,938,000 represents allotm ents on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of in debtedness of Series TJ-1930 were tendered in payment. Such exchange subscrip tions were a llo tte d 56 per cent, while allotm ents on other subscriptions were made on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotm ents were divided among the several Federal Reserve D is tric ts and the Treasury as follows: Federal Reserve D is tric t: Total Subscrip tions Received: Total Exchange Subscriptions Allotted;_____ Total Cash Subscriptions A llo tte d : Total Subscrip tions a llo tte d : Boston ïïew York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapoli s Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ 188,935,000 1,310,951,000 149.359.500 99.049.500 74.155.500 74,703,000 128.275.500 32.285.500 6,318,000 17.613.500 47.273.500 269,826,000 _______ 46,500 $ 806,500 129,255,000 262.500 880,000 286.500 165.500 13,506,000 1,172,500 304.500 647.500 267.500 1,362,000 22.000 $ 23,408,000 107,038,500 29.837.500 19.162.500 20.562.500 20.738.500 16.573.500 6,118,000 1,515,500 2,940,000 12,557,000 19.977.500 6,000 $ 24,214,500 236,293,500 30.100.000 20.042.500 20.849.000 20.904.000 30.079.500 7.290.500 1,820,000 3.587.500 12 *'824,500 21.339.500 28,000 $2,398,792,000 $148,938*000 $280,435,000 $429,373,000 Total TREASURY DEPARTMENT IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 16, 1930 The Treasury has received payments amounting to $117,141,598,24, due June 15, 1930, from the fo llo w in g fo re ig n governments on account of th e ir funded indebtedness to the United States, o f which $45,786,467,50 was fo r account o f p rin cip al and $71,355,130.74 fo r account o f in te re s t. A ll payments were received in cash. P rin cip al Belgium • • • • • $ 3,450,000.00 Czechoslovakia . 1,500,000.00 In tere st $ 1,375,000.00 — Estonia * • • • • — 150,000.00 Finland ............... — 129,885.00 France . . . . , Great B rita in . Hungary • • • . • I t a l y .................. L a tv ia . . . . . Lithuania • • • « Poland . , . • • 35,000,000.00 — — 66,390,000.00 — 28,804.73 5,000,000.00 — 36,467.50 — — 50,000.00 94,075.12 3,137,365.89 Rumania............... 600,000.00 — Yugoslavia 200.000.00 —- • • . $45,786,467.50 $71,355,130.74 I t w i l l he noted that a l l payments were made in cash, as compared with the p ra ctice which has p reva iled fo r a number of years o f making - 2 - payment of a greater part o f the amount due in United States s e c u rities, as permitted "by the debt funding agreements. In so fa r as fo re ig n in terest payments are concerned, th e ir payment on June 16th in cash rather than in United States secu rities w i l l have the e ffe c t of increasing the surplus fo r the current fis c a l year. When the Budget fig u res were made up, i t was thought that June fo re ig n in te re s t payments would he made in secu rities thus autom atically reducing the national debt by that amount. However as surplus funds in any given f i s c a l year are applied to debt retirement in accordance with the w ell-esta b lish ed practice o f the Treasury, the payment o f in terest in cash rather than in s ec u rities w i l l not a ffe c t the to ta l reduction o f the national debt as contemplated fo r the current fis c a l year. In so fa r as payments o f p rin cip a l are concerned, th e ir payment in cash or s ec u rities does not su bstan tially a ffe c t our budgetary p o sition , since under the terms o f the L ib e rty Bond Acts a l l cash payments on account of p rin cip al of o b ligation s o r ig in a lly acquired under those acts must be applied to debt retirem ent. On th is occasion that portion o f the p rin cip al payments on account o f such obliga tion s (which represents approximately 90 per cent o f the to ta l p rin cip a l payments received ) has already been applied to the retirement o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s maturing today. POE EELEASE, MOBNING PAPERS, Saturday, June 21, 1930# THEASUEY DEPARTMENT In answer to the question o f whether the enactment o f the Smoot-Hawley T a r iff Law would in his opinion adversely a ffe c t the business interests of the United States and retard a business recovery, Secretary Mellon said : BI do not believe that i t w i l l . have been greatly exaggerated* It seems to me that fears and criticism s Whenever a new protective t a r i f f law has been enacted gloomy prophecies have been made* They have fa ile d to m aterialize as fa r back as I can remember, and my memory goes back many years. The rates in the b i l l as i t passed the House a year ago were higher than in the b i l l recently signed by the President* alarm* Yet business at that time did not take There seems to be no reason why i t should now* I know o f no industry that is seriously hurt, while those industries which needed additional pro tection and received i t are benefited. I have canvassed the situation with the Secretary o f Commerce, and the notion that this law is going to destroy our foreign trade, expressed in some quarters, is certain ly without foundation. The United States w i l l continue to buy a vast quantity o f foreign products and to s e l l the products o f it s farms, mines, and factories a l l over the world. In so f a r as imports are concerned, fo reign nations that do business with us would do w ell to remember that the all-im portant facto r i s the maintenance of the high purchasing power and standard o f liv in g o f the American people. The enactment o f th is measure brings to an end 15 months of uncertainty. American industries know now where they stand and w i l l , I am confident, adjust themselves without d iffic u lt y to new conditions* There seems to be an impression that the new h i l l makes a sweeping revision upward o f e x istin g rates* While i t is true that there is a sharp increase in rates applicable to the a g ric u ltu ra l schedule, generally speaking other rates cannot he said to have heen advanced s u ffic ie n tly to a lt e r su bstan tially our existin g economic p o sition . In fa c t, only a comparatively few o f the major items have heen changed. I do not mean to imply that the h i l l is free from defects. No t a r i f f h i l l i s . But this measure at le a st by it s own terms provides the means whereby in equ alities and errors may he adjusted. upon the fle x ib le provisions as highly important. I look I believe that they o ffe r the opportunity not only to correct errors and to adjust rates to meet new and changing conditions, hut that they lay a foundation fo r a businesslike method of t a r i f f revision, fre e from the pxill o f sectional »nd p o lit ic a l interests that seem to make a s c ie n tific and well-balanced revision by the le g is la t iv e body almost impossible. I f these provisions are in te llig e n tly and courageously applied, they should go a long way toward making another le g is la t iv e revision of the t a r i f f unnecessary fo r many years to come* This of i t s e l f is o f inestimable benefit to business, fo r there is nothing more unfavorable to prosperity than uncertainty and frequent necessity to adjust economic conditions to le g is la t iv e enactments. In short, it seems to me that the fin a l enactment of the T a r iff Law, f a r from p lacin g a new obstacle in the way o f business recovery, removes one by elim inating the uncertainty of the la s t 15 months, and by it s promise o f more businesslike revision in the future makes a d e fin ite contribution to business s t a b i l i t y . 8 TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, MOiTEAIcRJITE 23, 1930. The Secretary of the Treasury announced the signing today of the Agreement authorized by Act of Congress approved June 5, 1930, pro vid in g fo r the comxolete and fin a l discharge o f the ob liga tion s of Germany to the United States in respect o f the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commis sion, United States and Germany, and the costs o f the United States Army o f Occupation, In b r ie f, the Agreement provides that Germany agrees to pay 40.800.000 reichsmarks ($9,700,000) fo r the period September 1, 1929 to March 31, 1930, and the sum o f 40,800,000 reichsmarks per annum from A p ril 1, 1930 to March 31, 1981, in sa tis fa c tio n o f Mixed Claims, and fo r the period from September 1, 1929 to March 31, 1966 an average annuity of 25.300.000 reichsmarks ($6,000,000) in f u l l liq u id a tio n o f our Army Costs. As evidence o f th is indebtedness Germany is to issue to the United States, at par, bonds maturing semi-annually. Under the Agree ment the United States w i l l re ceive on account o f Army Costs over a period o f 37 years approximately $250,000,000 and on account o f Mixed Claims Awards over a period o f 52 years, approximately $505,000,000, The pay ments to be received on account o f Army Costs include in te re s t at the rate of about 3-5/8 per cent per annum on a l l payments deferred over a period longer than would have been necessary to liq u id a te the Army Costs under the P a ris Agreement. The Mixed Claims Awards bear in te re s t at the rates sp e c ifie d in such awards up to January 1, 1928 and the Settlement o f War Claims Act s p e c ifie s a rate o f 5 per cent from that date u n til paid. - 2 - The payments to be received on th is account include, th erefo re, in te rest which w ill be paid on the awards. While the annuities are stated in terms o f reichsmarks, payments are to be made in d o lla rs , e ith e r at the Treasury or at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The exchange value o f the mark in re la tio n to the d o lla r shall be calculated at the average o f the middle rates p re v a ilin g on the B erlin bourse during the h a lf monthly period preceding the date of payment. The German Government undertakes that the reichsmark shall have and shall reta in i t s con v e r t i b i l i t y in to gold or devisen as contemplated in the present Reichsbank law and that the reichsmark shall reta in the mint p a rity defined in the German coinage law of August 30, 1924. rdf. TREASURY DSPABBOTT SOS IMMEDIATE RELEASE, TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 1930. The Secretary of the Treasury announces that a ten ta tive agreement has been reached with the c it y o f f i c i a l s o f Sew York City providing fo r the acq u isition o f a new s ite fo r a Federal bu ildin g to accommodate the post o ffic e a c t iv it ie s now located a t C ity H all Park and other govern mental o ffic e s now in rented quarters? the tran sfer to the C ity of Sew York of the Federal property located in C ity H all Park and fo r the purchase of a suitable s ite in the C ivic Center fo r a separate building fo r the Federal Courts. I t w i l l be necessary to obtain amendatory le g is la tio n to carry out the agreement with the C ity o f Hew York and the Department w i l l take immediate action looking toward the securing o f the le g is la tio n at th is present session o f Congress. The assistance rendered the Department by the Merchants’ Association o f Hew York C ity in i t s n egotiations with the c it y o f f i c i a l s o f Hew York is appreciated. TREASURY /DEPARTMENT # .• * • • TO BE RELEASED UPON APPEARANCE BEFORE THE COMMITTEE, WEDNESDAY, «TUNE 25, 1930« 0 STATEMENT BY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY MELLON BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND CURRENCY, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IN CONNECTION WITH H. J. RES. 364. Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen o f the Committee: This resolu tion is designed to proh ib it Federal Reserve Banks, national hanks and State member banks of the Federal Reserve System from purchasing German Reparation Bonds or other c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness issued pursuant to the new plan fo r the settlement of the fin a n c ia l Questions resu ltin g from the World War, as outlined in the agreement reached between certain signatory nations at The Hague on the 20th of January, 1930. Under present law Federal Reserve Banks have no au thority to purchase bonds o f th is character. Consequently, the resolu tion is meaningless in so fa r as they are concerned. National banks under the provisions o f Section 5136 o f the Revised Statutes as amended by the McFadden Act o f February 25, 1927, are lim ited to buying marketable obliga tion s in the form o f bonds, notes and/or debentures, commonly known as investment s e c u rities, under such fu rther d e fin itio n o f that term as may, by regu lation , be prescribed by the Comptroller o f the Currency. The regu lation s issued by the Comptroller define the term »marketable" as meaning that the security has such a market as to render sales at in tr in s ic values re a d ily possible. 1, The p rin cip a l provision s o f the regulations being: that the issue be o f a s u ffic ie n t ly la,rge to ta l to make m arketability p ossib le; and 2. such a public d istrib u tio n o f the secu rity must have been, provided fo r or made in a manner to p rotect or insure the m arketability of the issue. - 2 - The sec u rities which may "be purchased "by State member banks are, o f course, governed by State law, I b e lie v e both Congress and the Comptroller of the Currency showed sound judgment and wisdom in dealing with such le g is la tio n . They recognize that while national banks are in stru m en talities o f the Federal Government, they are operated by p riva te ca p ita l and by th e ir o ffic e r s and d irecto rs elected by th eir stockholders. The Government does not undertake to manage the banks, and the wisdom o f placin g upon thorn the re s p o n s ib ility fo r th e ir in vestments, with proper safeguards, cannot bo questioned. There is , in my opinion, no more reason fo r Congress to say that a national benk should not purchase a reparation bond than to say that i t should not purchase a s p e c ific ra ilro a d or in du strial bond. in the banks1 management. To do so trould place our Government d ir e c tly I t is unsound and unnecessary. To go fu rth er and t e l l a State member bank that regardless of State law, i t may not purchase a p a rticu la r security is not consistent w ith my con ception ox our p rin cip les o f government as established by the Constitution. I t is not apparent to me that any good purpose would be served by the adoption o f th is resolu tion. soever. In fa.ct, I see no ju s t ific a t io n fo r i t what The statement in the preamble that purchases of these bonds by investors who are c itiz e n s o f the United States, or by banks o f the United States, would resu lt in the interm ingling o f reparation payments with war debts, is based, evid en tly, on a complete misconception o f the situ ation. The settlements e ffe c te d by the United States Government with i t s debtors are e n tire ly independent of the settlement e ffe c te d by Germany with i t s . debtors. The United States Government is not a party to the Young Plan. Neither in the past has i t been, nor w i l l i t in the future, be responsible fo r the c o lle c tio n or d istrib u tio n o f reparation payments. The purchase by an i* 1 - 3 - American c itiz e n or an American bank o f a reparation bond, cannot a lt e r in any way our situation or p o lic y in th is respect. I t is not apparent to me how the sale o f a portion o f th is particu la r bond issue in the American market can a ffe c t our debt settlement p o lic y any more than when a portion o f the German external loan o f 1924 was flo a te d in th is market. I am very d e fin it e ly of the opinion that fo r the reasons above stated there is no occasion fo r the adoption o f th is resolu tion and that i t would be against public p o lic y to do so, I may add fo r the sake o f accuracy that I know o f no provision providing fo r the annual sale of German Reparation Bonds in the United States. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, JULY 1, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT The fo llow in g announcement was made today by Secretary Mellon in connection with the close o f the fis c a l year o f the Government on June 30: Figures now a va ila b le in the d a ily Treasury statement fo r June 30 reveal that the finances o f the Government fo r the fis c a l year ju st closed made a sa tisfa cto ry showing. Receipts again exceeded expenditures, and a fu rther reduction was e ffe c te d in the public debt. The to t a l ordinary re ceip ts amounted to $4,178,000,000 as compared with $4,033,000,000 in 1929. Expenditures chargeable against the ordinary re ceip ts were $3,994,000,000 as compared with $3,848,000,000 in 1929. The surplus, th erefore, was £184,000,000 but included in th is amount is the abnormal sum o f $75,000,000 paid by fo re ig n governments in June in cash instead of in obliga tion s of th is government in accordance with the p re v a ilin g practice fo r a number o f years and the abnormal customs re ceip ts due to an ticip ation o f t a r i f f le g is la tio n . RECEIPTS The aggregate of customs and in tern al revenue re c e ip ts was $3,625,000,000 or $86,000,000 greater than re ceip ts from these sources in 1929 and $11,000,000 below the Treasui^y's aggregate estimate a ft e r allowance fo r tax reduction. Income tax aggregated $2,411,000,000 as against $2,331,000,000 in 1929, or an increase of $80,000,000. Based on prelim inary reports from C ollectors, the receip ts from the current corporation income tax were higher than during the previous f is c a l year due to the fa c t that growth in corporate income more than o ffs e t the 1 per cent reduction e ffe c t iv e on c o lle c tio n s made during the second h a lf o f the fis c a l year 1930. were $6,000,000 greater than anticip ated . Back tax c o lle c tio n s The current in dividu al income - 2 - tax receip ts were also higher than during the previous fis c a l year. In th is connection i t w i l l he re ca lled that there was a substantial aggregate increase in individual income in the calendar year 1928 due to re a liz a tio n on. sales of cap ita l assets in the security market. As above indicated, the to ta l income tax receip ts during the f i s c a l year 1930 were $2,411,000,000. reduction was $2,480,000,000. The Treasury’ s estimate la s t f a l l before tax A fte r taking in to consideration the e ffe c t of the tax reduction applicable to co lle c tio n s made during only h a lf o f the fis c a l year, the estimate became $2,400,000,000, or $11,000,000 below actual c o lle c tio n s . Obviously, the advance estimate, in view of the amounts in volved, showed a re markable degree o f accuracy. Receipts from customs duties, including the tonnage tax, were $587,000,000 as compared with $602,000,000 in 1929, and the Treasury estimate of the same amount fo r 1930. For the f i r s t quarter o f the f i s c a l year 1930 customs receip ts were about $13,000,000 greater than fo r the same period in 1929, Subsequently, there was a steady decline u n til the month o f May, which was s lig h tly over May, 1929, In June, 1930, however, the c o lle c tio n s were sub s ta n tia lly greater than in the same month a year ago, due to the large receip ts during the period o f a few days p rio r to the e ffe c t iv e date o f the new t a r i f f law. Miscellaneous in tern al revenue re ceip ts were $628,000,000 as compared with $607,000,000 in 1929,an increase o f $21,000,000 and a decrease below the es timate of $7,000,000. More than 90$ o f the Miscellaneous In tern a l Revenue receip ts is derived from the tobacco ta x, the stamp tax,and the estate tax. On the basis of co llection s received during the f i r s t 11 months o f the f is c a l year and estimates fo r -3the month of June, 1930, the re ceip ts from tobacco were about $450,000,000, an increase o f about $16,000,000 over 1929, as compared with an increase fo r 1929 of $38,000,000 over 1928. Stamp tax receip ts were about $77,000,000, as compared with the high fig u re o f $64,000,000 during 1929, and $49,000,000 in 1928. Estate tax yielded about the same as la s t year, when the re ceip ts were $62,000,000. The remainder of the d ifferen ce between 1930 and 1929 c o lle c tio n s is la rg e ly accounted for by decrease in c o lle c tio n s under repealed laws. EXPENDITURES The t o t a l expenditures chargeable against ordinary re c e ip ts were $3,994,000,000 as compared with $3,848,000,000 in 1929, or an increase o f |146,000,000. There are a number o f items of increases and decreases comprising this d ifferen ce but the p rin cip a l items o f increases are $37,000,000 on account of the War Department, $10,000,000 fa r the Navy, $29,000,000 fo r the Veterans’ Bureau, $14,000,000 fo r Department o f Commerce (due p r in c ip a lly to cost of the Census) $16,000,000 fa r the Shipping Board, and $150,000,000 f o r the revolvin g fund provided in the A gricu ltu ra l Marketing Act. The main items o f decrease are 119,000,000 reduction in in te rest payments, $57,000,000 decrease in in tern a l revenue refunds, and $52,000,000 paid in the previous year to ra ilro a d s under a Supreme Court decision on account o f back railw ay mail pay. Estimated expenditures in the Budget were $4,023,000,000 or $29,000,000 greater than the actu al expenditures. This d iffe re n c e is the net amount o f a number o f Increases and decreases, the most important o f which are increased expenditures under the A g ricu ltu ra l Marketing Act amd the Veterans’ Bureau, and decreases under the Treasury Department on account of postponement to the fis c a l year 1931 o f estimated expenditures under the Settlement o f War Claims Act and fo r public bu ildin gs, and payments made in cash in June by fo reig n governments under debt settlem ents. -4 SURPLUS The o rig in a l estimate o f the surplus made in advance o f the f is c a l year was $225,000,000, The 1 per cent ta x reduction o f la s t f a l l , estimated as amounting to $80,000,000 fear tM s f i s c a l year, reduced th is fig u re to $145,000,000* The actu al surplus fo r the year just closed is $184,000,000, As above indicated, however, there is included in th is amount the sum of $76,000,000 on account o f payments by fo reig n governments in cash rather than in s e c u ritie s as h eretofore under debt settlement agreements in accordance with the procedure follow ed fo r a number o f years past, which change in method of payment was not anticipated at the time the estimate was made, PUBLIC DEBT At the close o f the f i s c a l year 1930, the to ta l gross debt was $16,185,000,000 as compared with $16,931,000,000 on June 30, 1929, or a reduction of $746,000,000, Of th is amount $554,000,000 is to be a ttrib u ted to the sinking fund and other retirem ents chargeable against ordinary re c e ip ts . The net balance in the general fund at the close o f the fis c a l year was $318,000,000 as compared with $326,000,000 on June 30, 1929. The annual rate o f in terest on the in terest-b earin g debt on June 30, 1930, was 3,804 Per cent as compared with 3,944 per cent on June 30, 1929, The decrease was due to lowering of the borrowing ra tes on short-term s e c u ritie s . Total in terest payments in the fis c a l year were $659,000,000 as compared with $678,000,000 in the fis c a l year 1929, or a saving o f $19,000,000* -oOo FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, JULY 3, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON Secretary Mellon today issued the fo llow in g statement: The Treasury deems i t advisable to correct certain inaccurate state ments and quotations' appearing in various newspaper a r t ic le s with reference to proposed or purported agreements with Great B rita in and France with respect to double taxation. No n egotiations are pending with Great B rita in , nor are any negotiations contemplated by the Treasury at the present time. Informal and prelim inary n egotiations have been carried on between our representatives and representatives o f the French Government with reference to the tax situ ation ex istin g in France. Mr. Ellsworth C. Alvord, Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury, returned from P a ris about a week ago and has gone over in d e ta il with the Treasury o f f i c i a l s the resu lts of the prelim inary n egotiations. However, no agreement has been entered in to and no action by the Treasury has been taken with respect thereto. Inasmuch as the Treasury is not empowered to enter in to agreements of th is nature, i t can take no d e fin ite action u n til a fte r le g is la t iv e authority has been granted, which obviously cannot be obtained p rio r to the next session of the Congress. Any agreement by the Treasury must, ’o f course, conform to le g is la t iv e authority. I t is impossible, th erefore, at th is time to make any d é fin ite statement eith er as to the p o s s ib ilit y o f a fin a l agreement or as to any o f i t s terms. ROR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Monday, July 7, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY ACTING SECRETARY OP THE TREASURY HOPE The Secretary o f the Treasury gives no tied that tenders are in vited fo r Treasury h i lls to the amount o f $50,000,000, or thereabouts. The Treasury h i l l s w i l l he sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l he received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o*clock P.M ., Eastern Standard time, on July 10, 1930. Tenders w i l l not be received at the Treasury De partment, Washington. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be dated July 14, 1930, and w i l l mature on September 15, 1930, and on the maturity date the face amount w ill be payable without in te re s t. They w i l l be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $10,000, and $100,000 (maturity va lu e). P a rticu la r atten tion is in vited to the fa c t that by the Act o f Congress approved June 17, 1930, Treasury b i l l s were given an addi tion a l tax exemption featu re. That Act provides that any gain from the sale or other d isp ositio n o f Treasury b i l l s issued a ft e r June 17, 1930, sh all be exempt from a l l taxation, except estate or inheritance taxes, and that no loss from the sale or other disp osition thereof shall be allowed as a deduction, or otherwise recognised, fo r the pur poses o f any tax now or h erea fter imposed by the United States or any o f it s possessions. Accordingly, these Treasury b i l l s w i l l be ex empt, as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, and any gain from the sale or other - 2- disp osition thereof w i l l also Tbe exempt, from a l l taxation, except estate or inheritance taxes. I t is urged that tenders he made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l he supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon application therefor« No tender fo r an amount less than $1,000 w i l l he considered# Each tender must he in m ultiples o f $1,000# The p rice o ffe re d must he expressed on the hasis o f 100, w ith not more than three decimal places, e# g . , 99.125, fra c tio n s must not he used. Tenders w ill he accepted without cash deposit from incorporated hanks and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment securities# Tenders from others must he accompanied hy a deposit o f 10 per cent of the face amount o f Treasury h i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied hy an express guaranty o f pay ment hy an incorporated hank or trust company# Immediately a ft e r the clo sin g hour fo r receip t o f tenders on July 10, 1930, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up to the clo sin g hour w i l l he opened and public an nouncement o f the acceptable p rices w i l l fo llo w as soon as possible th erea fter, probably on the fo llow in g morning# The Secretary o f the Treasury expressly reserves the rig h t to r e je c t any or a l l tenders or parts of tenders, and to a l l o t less than the amount applied fo r , and his action in any such respect sh all he fin al# Those submitting tenders w i l l he advised o f the acceptance or re jectio n thereof# Payment i €* ~3- at the price o ffered fo r Treasury M i l s a llo t t e d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a v a ila b le funds on July 14, 1930. Treasury Department Circular No. 418, as amended, dated June 25, 1930, and this notice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, prescribe the terms o f the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions of th e ir issue. Copies o f the c irc u la r may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch th ereof. > TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, FRIDAY, JULY 11, 1930. Statement by Acting Secretary Hope Acting Secretary o f the Treasury Hope announced to-day that the tenders fo r $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of Treasury B ills dated July 14, 1930 and maturing September 15, 1930, which were o ffered on July 7, 1930, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on July 10, 1930. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $328,968,000. The highest bid made was 99.720, equivalent to an in te re s t ra ta o f about 1.60 per cent on an annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.660, equivalent to an in te re s t rate o f about 1.94 per cent on an annual basis. $50,920,000, is 99.672. The to ta l amount of bids accepted was The average price o f Treasury B ills to be issued The average rate on a bank discount basis i s about 1-7/8 per cent. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING JULY 15, 1930. Some Recent Accomplishments of the Treasury Address of Honorable Walter E. Hope, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Over Network o f National Broadcasting Company, 37 ' I suspect there is a general disp osition to regard any descrip tion o f the a c t iv it ie s o f the United States Treasury as rather compli cated, somewhat formidable and therefore d i f f i c u l t to understand. The re p e titio n of s t a t is t ic s , p a rtic u la rly when they deal in the b illio n s , is apt to have a numbing e ffe c t on the human mind and the average person is soon content to leave i t to the experts and turn to something with more human in te re s t. And yet the subject is one which i s o f v i t a l in te re s t to every c itiz e n o f the country, in greater or le s s degree, and to the w elfare o f h is fam ily and there is no reason why the essen tial fa c ts cannot be placed before him in clea r and simple fashion so that he may re a d ily understand and appreciate them. I t i s not a question, fo r example, whether he a ctu a lly pays income tax or not. I t is a matter of d irect concern to him how the finances o f the Government are conducted, what are i t s revenues, receip ts and expenditures, and what e ffo r ts are being made fo r the improvement o f the service. In government, as in business, i t is w e ll to stop occasionally and take stock o f what has been accomplished. The present moment, fo llow in g the adjournment o f Congress? seems the lo g ic a l time to review what has been done, not only as regards le g is la tio n enacted by Congress but also in respect to adm inistrative achievements in improving the machinery o f government and in meeting and solvin g new problems that have arisen. - 2 - U n til we review that record as a whole, i t is impossible to assess properly the value o f what has been accomplished or the extent o f the progress that has been made during the la s t sixteen months. For th is reason, i t may be worth while to review b r i e f l y the Treasury’ s part in the making o f that record and in the conduct o f the public business since the present Administration came into power. 'The Treasury has ju st closed i t s fis c a l year on June 30, 1930. For that year, i t s records show a surplus o f $184,000,000, curiously enough almost ex a ctly the same as the surplus o f the preceding year. This surplus was brought about, notwithstanding the reduction in income tax ra tes, to which I w i l l r e fe r again la t e r . During th is period a fu rth er substantial reduction was effe c te d in the public debt. When the present Administration began on March 4, 1929, the gross public debt o f the United States Government amounted to $17,345,000,000. On June 30, 1930, at the end o f the f i s c a l year, the debt has been reduced to $16,185,000,000, or a reduction during the period o f $1,160,000,000. At the present rate o f in te re s t, th is means a saving in in te rest payments c f over $40,000,000 per year. I t means also that the Government has adhered s t r i c t l y to the sound and w e llestablished p o lic y o f paying o f f the public debt as ra p id ly as the revenues permit. You w i l l no doubt r e c a ll that on August 1, 1919, the debt amounted to $26,500,000,000. To-day i t is $16,185,000,000, which represents a reduction o f $10,000,000,000 in a l i t t l e over 10 years, an achievement o f which any nation might be proud. I t represents a saving 3 - in in te re s t o f approximately $350,000,000 per year. To-day the debt has “been reduced to manageable proportions; and eventually, as the debt is fu rther cut down th is drain on our revenues w i l l continue to be reduced, and we should be able to look forward to a corresponding reduction in our taxes. During the period since March 4, 1929, Congress has authorized three debt settlements with fo reig n debtor nations* Settlements were concluded with Austria, Greece and Prance, thus completing the funding o f the indebtedness owed to us by fo reig n governments, with the ex ceptions o f Armenia and Russia, with which, fo r obvious reasons, no settlements can be made at present. The t o ta l amount funded is $11,577,000,000, on account o f which the United States w i l l receive in payment o f prin cip al and in te re s t, over the periods sp e c ifie d in the agreements, the sum o f $22,000,000,000. In addition to th is , a s e t t le ment was concluded with Germany on June 23, 1930, fo r the indebtedness o f that country to the United States on account o f the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany, and the costs o f the United States Army o f Occupation. Under th is agreement, the United States w ill c o lle c t from Germany over a period o f years $250,000,000 on account o f Army costs and $500,000,000 on account o f the awards o f the Mixed Claims,Commission to be distribu ted to American nationals re ceivin g such awards. How as regards taxes; on December 18, 1929, President Hoover ap proved a jo in t resolu tion o f Congress, reducing rates o f income tax fo r the calendar year 1929. The e ffe c t of th is reduction was to lower the norma,! tax on the taxable incomes o f individu als by one per cent and sim ila rly to reduce the tax on the taxable incomes o f corporations fo r the calendar year 1929froml2 per cent to 11 per cent. An out standing feature o f this reduction was the re la tiv e ly large benefit afforded to taxpayers with re la tiv e ly small taxable incomes, c h ie fly those with earned incomes derived from sa la rie s and wages. It was the f i f t h reduction in taxes which the Federal Government has made within le ss than nine years. I t s e ffe c ts have been far-reaching and have benefited a l l those paying income taxes to the Federal Government. In the co llectio n o f these taxes, the Bureau o f Internal Revenue has effected many improvements during the la s t sixteen months, while at the same time bringing about a reduction both in the number o f employees and in the cost o f collection . During this period substantial progress has been made in establishing the work o f the Income Tax Unit upon a current basis. For example, on Jun. 30» 192S, there were pending in the Income Tax Unit, 221,533 cases covering the years 1917 to 1927 in clusive. In June, 1930, the number o f cases on hand for these years requiring investigation in the f i e l d had been red&ced to 29, 7^ 3 * It s efficien cy w i ll be further increased by the transfer during the past month o f the Bureau o f Internal Revenue to the new bu ild in g which has been erected to house a l l it s scattered a c t iv it ie s , which have hitherto been quartered in separate buildings at some distance from one another. The bringing o f a l l divisions under one roof should make possible better coordination and further economies o f time and expense. In addition to it s accomplishments in the way o f reducing expense and at the same time speeding up it s work, thfc Bureau has continued it s e ffo rts to b u ild up a better relationship with the tax-paying public. - 5 - I t is at present engaged upon an endeavor to sim p lify the income tax return with a view to reducing the d i f f ic u lt i e s and ©duplications, p a rtic u la rly o f the smaller taxpayer. I t has proceeded fu rth er upon i t s p o lic y o f endeavoring to a rriv e at a ju st and equitable determination o f disputes without resortin g to lit ig a t io n , w ith a resu lt that is f a i r to both p a rtie s . While in a business o f such magnitude controversies are in evita b le, i t is the b e l i e f o f the Department that the conduct o f a tax system should be p rim arily an adm inistrative problem, with resort to the Courts only when the taxpayer and the Government cannot agree upon a f a i r d isp ositio n . I t is o f course ess en tia l that certa in fundamental p rin c ip le s be determined by the Courts, but as these are decided, from time to time, the necessity o f re so rtin g to lit ig a t io n , with a l l it s attendant delay and expense, should ste a d ily decrease... In th is connection, the Bureau has so advanced it s work: that i t expects at the end o f th is calendar year to dispense e n tire ly with the p ra c tic e o f r e questing from any taxpayer a waiver extending the time o f expiration o f the statute o f lim ita tio n s . As a matter o f fa c t, in the great m ajority o f cases this p ra c tic e has been fo r the b e n e fit o f the taxpayer, but i t has been the subject o f some c r itic is m in the past, and in order to avoid any p ossib le ground o f complaint, the Bureau proposes that a fte r December 31, 1930, no waivers w i l l be requested by the Department and that waivers w i l l th erea fter be executed only upon the request o f the taxpayer. Turning now to other matters* in the f i s c a l operations o f the Treasury certain improvements have been made as the re s u lt o f recent - 6 le g is la tio n . 377 One o f t h e s i s the issuing o f a new form o f short-term public debt security known as Treasury h i l l s » under authority o f the Act o f Congress» approved June 17, 1939, public debt. These h i l l s g re a tly sim p lify the management o f the They permit a new and more f l e x i b l e type o f security; they sup plement or add to the system established fo r short-term financing; they enable the Treasury, by competitive bidding» to borrow fo r short periods at the lowest rates consistent with current market conditions; and they provide the banks and the in vestin g public with a new instrument, having frequent and convenient m atu rities, fo r the investment o f temporary surplus funds. Only la s t Thursday, the Treasury sold i t s most recent issue o f Treasury b i l l s consisting of $50,000,000, at an in te rest rate averaging 1-7/8 per cent per annum. This constituted a record, being the lowest rate at which the Government has ever been able to borrow. Another improvement which has been put in to e ffe c t is the reduction in the size of the currency. on July 10, 1929, The actual issue o f the new currency was commenced The reduction in size has resu lted in substantial savings in the cost of manufacture, as w ell as in the handling o f currency. standing the innovation, the new currency was accorded a favorable Notwith reception from the start and i t is remarkable how ra p id ly the old size b i l l s have d is appeared from ordinary circu la tio n . An important change in the Treasury organization has been the tran sfer to the Department o f Justice o f certain functions in the adm inistration of the National P roh ib ition Act, as provided in the Act approved May 27, 1930. Under th is Act a Bureau- o f Proh ib ition is created in the Department o f Justice and the Bureau o f In d u stria l Alcohol is retained in the Treasury, with provision fo r close co-operation between the two departments. Another change in organization has been made by the creation in the Treasury Department o f a Bureau o f N a rco tici under the Act o f June 14, 1930. There are a number of other important a c t iv it ie s which many people are un aware axe conducted under the Supervision o f the Treasury. Included among these are the Public Health S ervice,the Coast Guard and the construction o f Public Buildings. - 7The f a c i l i t i e s o f the Public Health Service have been extended and it s work in the study, prevention and cure o f disease has been made more e ffe c tiv e . The b i l l fo r the establishment o f a National In stitu te o f Health, which was signed by the President on May 26, 1930, provides fo r the gradual building up o f a large research in stitu te, o f which the Hygienic Laboratory w i l l servo as the nucleus. The b i l l authorizes the Secretary o f the Treasury to accept private donations fo r use in research work at the In stitu te , It further provides fo r the increase in the research s t a ff by the establishment o f fellow ships p e m ittin g individual scien tists to contribute the ben efits o f th eir research to the United States, In the period since March 4, 1929, the Coast Guard has been larged and has greatly increased in effic ie n c y . oeh During the fis c a l year ended June 30, 1929, the number o f liv e s saved or persons rescued from p e r il by the Coast Guard was 4,375 and the value o f vessels assisted, including th eir cargoes, was $49,128,375, Plans are being prepared and are nearing completion fo r the erection o f a new Coast Guard Academy at New London, Connecticut, Funds have been provided which w i l l greatly improve the aviation f a c i l i t i e s o f the Service, Pew people appreciate the magnitude o f the public buildin g program which is being carried on under the supervision o f the Treasury, In order to conduct th is program expeditiously, the O ffice o f the Super vising Architect is being strengthened in i t s personnel; and in addition the Treasury i s employing private architects fo r some o f the large projects and w i ll employ more in. the near future under the enlarged authority recently granted by Congress, During the period since March 4, 1929, the K eyes-E lliott B i l l has been passed by Congress, adding $230,000,000 to the previous authorizations and making the to ta l amount now authorized fo r public bu ilding $520,000,000. In the D is tr ic t o f Columbia, the Internal Revenue Building, in vo lvin g nearly $10,000,000, and the Adm inistrative Building fo r the Department o f Agricu ltu re, in volvin g approximately $2,000,000, have been completed and are now occupied. The extension to the Government P rin tin g O ffic e , in volvin g $2,225,000, is nearing completion. The Department o f Commerce Building, in volvin g $17,500,000, is about h a lf completed; and i t * i s expected that the cen tral p ortion w i l l be fin ish ed and ready fo r occupancy by the end o f th is calendar year. Other buildings which i t is expected w i l l be started during the fis c a l year beginning July 1, 1930, are; the Post O ffic e Department Building, in volvin g s lig h t ly over $10,000,000; the bu ilding fo r the Department o f Ju stice, $10,000,000; the General Accounting O ffic e , $4,500,000, refa cin g and remodeling the State Department Building, in vo lvin g $3,000,000; and the Administration Building fo r the Public Health Service at an approximate cost o f $865,000. With the inauguration o f these important p ro jec ts the long-awaited plan fo r the b eau tifyin g o f Washington and the resto ra tio n o f the L *Enfant plan w ill be w ell started on i t s way to accomplishment. In the country at la rg e there are now under construction fift y - t w o buildings, aggregating $26,000,000, and, o f these, f i v e exceed in cost $1,000,000 each. gatin g $11,000,000. Twenty buildings are being advertised fo r bids, aggre In so fa r as circumstances permit, work on»these buildings in Washington and throughout the country is being pushed as rapid ly as possible in order to carry out President Hoover's sound and constructive p o lic y fo r increasing building a c t iv it y and so stim ulating a l l other lin e s o f endeavor during the months immediately ahead# - 9 * The Bureau o f Customs has been completely reorganized during bhe past year, i t s personnel strengthened, and a course o f in stru ction in stitu te d fo r representatives going abroad and others engaged in the c o lle c tio n o f duties on imports. Much study has been given to the handling o f passengers* baggage as a means o f aiding American tra v e le rs returning from fo reig n countries. A committee o f tw en ty-five prominent c itiz e n s has been appointed who w i l l advise and recommend, p a rtic u la rly with respect to conditions at the Port o f Hew York. A new form o f baggage declaration g re a tly s im p lifie d has been issued as an a id to incoming passengers and a booklet o f instru ctions c le a r ly ou tlin in g the necessary fo rm a litie s is in course o f preparation. Provision has been made by the Congress fo r the acqu isition o f 37 s ite s on the Canadian and Mexican borders fo r the erection o f Customs-Immigration inspection station s. These stations, when completed, w i l l g re a tly expedite inspection o f highway t r a f f i c , a ffo rd in g proper f a c i l i t i e s fo r the inspection o f baggage and protectin g the tra v e lin g public frgm the elements during such inspection. The Treasury has en tire confidence in the fin a n c ia l s t a b ilit y both of the Government and o f the country. Even th is b r ie f and incomplete outline o f the Treasury*s a c t iv it ie s indicates that the finances o f the Government are in sound condition and that the Government i t s e l f , under the leadership o f President Hoover, is in a p o sition to furnish the steadying influence necessary in any situ ation that may a ris e . The unusual conditions through which we have been passing are world wide in th e ir application and are lim ite d to no one country. size or importance is immune from th e ir e ffe c t s . are in process o f taking pla ce. Ho country of any Great economic changes Many o f these conditions are new and c a ll fo r a d iffe re n t treatment than in the past. We are fortunate in - 10 - having at the head o f the Government at th is time a man who "by tra in in g and experience is equipped to meet such a situ ation , a man o f outstand ing and demonstrated a b ilit y , t ir e le s s industry, unquestioned in te g r ity , and u n selfish devotion to duty and the public in terest* He brings to his task a thorough understanding o f the economic forces with which we must deal* The problems which confront us are admittedly not easy o f solution but we have faced worse in the past and emerged with success, and I am confident that with a leadership characterized by brains, in te g r ity and public s p ir it backed by the natural resourcefulness and strength o f our people, we w ill again find the solu tion and presen tly press forward to even greater achievements* FOR IMMEDIATS RELEASE, FRIDAY, JULY 25, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT Statement by Secretary M ellon» The statement o f Congressman. Byrns in the morning press con fuses the matter o f appropriations with actual expenditures and leaves an erroneous impression* As a matter o f fa c t , the figu res presented "by the President to the press were furnished by the Budget Bureau and are the July 1 working fig-ores o f the Treasury Department. As p reviou sly stated, including the estimated postal d e f i c i t , the to ta l budget estimates o f expenditures fo r the present fis c a l year are $4,203,354,457, as compared with actual expenditure fo r the la s t f is c a l year o f $3,994,152,487, or an increase of $209,101,970, being an increase o f 5$. N atu rally these fig u res do not include amounts appropriated fo r future years which w i l l not be expended during the present fis c a l year.. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY ACTING SECRETARY Acting Secretary o f the Treasury Hope g iv es notice that tenders are in v ite d fo r Treasury h i l l s to the amount o f $120,000,000, or thereabouts# The Treasury h i l l s w i l l he sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l he received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches th ereof, up to two o ’ clock P. M., Eastern Standard time, on August 14, 1930 Tenders w i l l not he received at the Treasury Department, Washington, The Treasury h i l l s w i l l he dated August 18, 1930, and w i l l mature on November 17, 1930, and on the maturity date the face amount w i l l he payable without in te re s t. They w i l l he issued in hearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $10,000, and $100,000 (m aturity va lu e). I t is urged that tenders he made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l he supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon a p p lication th erefor. No tender fo r an amount le s s than $1,000 w i l l he considered. tender must he in m ultiples o f $1,000. Each The p rice o ffe re d must he ex pressed on the basis o f 100, with not more than three decimal places, e. g . , 99.125. Fractions must not he used. Tenders w i l l he accepted without cash deposit from incorporated hanks and tru st companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment secu rities. Tenders from others must he accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent o f the face amount o f Treasury h i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guaranty o f pay ment by an incorporated hank or trust company. 3<?y - 2 - Immediately a fte r the closin g hour fo r re ceip t o f tenders on August 14, 1930, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up to the closin g hour w i l l be opened and public an nouncement o f the acceptable p rices w ill fo llo w as soon as possible th e rea fter, probably on the fo llo w in g morning. The Secretary of the Treasury expressly reserves the rig h t to r e je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a l l o t le s s than the amount applied fo r , and h is action in any such respect shall be fin a l. Those submitting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance or re je c tio n thereof. Payment at the p ric e o ffered fo r Treasury b i l l s a llo tte d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a v a ila b le funds on August 18, 1930. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be exempt, as to p rin cip al and in te re s t, and any gain from the sale or other d isp osition thereof w i l l also be exempt, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes* No lo s s from the sale or other d isp osition o f the Treasury b i l l s shall be allowed as a deduction, or otherwise recognized, fo r the purposes o f any tax now or h ereafter imposed by the United States or. any o f i t s possessions. Treasury Department Circular No. 418, as amended, dated June 25, 1930, and th is n otice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, pre scribe the terms o f the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions o f th e ir issue. Copies o f the circu la r may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch th ereof. FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS', FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY MELLON Secretary of the Treasury Mellon announced today that the tenders fo r $120,000,000, or thereabouts, of Treasury B i l l s dated August 18, 1930 and maturing November 17, 1930, which were o ffered on Au^nst 11, 1930i were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on August 14, 1930. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $397,162,000*- The highest bid made was 99.59S1equivalent to an in te rest ra te of about 1,61 per cent on an.annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 90.473 equivalent to an in te re s t rate o f about 2,08 per cent on an annual basis. accepted was $120,000,000. The to ta l amount o f bids The average p ric e of Treasury B ills to be issued is 99.5044-^, The average rate on a bank discount basis is about 1.96 per cent. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Friday, August 22, 1930 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Statement "by Secretary Mellon. The sto ries appearing in the morning papers r e la tin g to the. revenue prospects fo r the current f is c a l year overemphasize the unfavor able fa ctors* I t is a ltogeth er too e a rly to make any d e fin ite statements. The fin a l estimates need not he prepared u n til ju st p rio r to the meeting o f thé Congress in December, at which time the Department w i l l be in a much b e tte r position to determine the budgetary situ ation » The revenue during the fis c a l year 1931 w ill be reduced as compared with that of the f is c a l year 1930, but i t should not be fo rgotten that we closed the la t t e r year with a substantial surplus* While no one could d e fin it e ly promise at th is time that the one per cent tax reduction granted at the la s t session of Congress can be maintained during the calendar year 1931, I can say that a fte r a carefu l review o f such fig u res as are a va ila b le at th is time I have a very re a l hope that we may be able to make such a recommendation to the Cohgross in December* TREASURY DEPARTSSHT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1930. August 27, 1930. My dear Governor Young: I regret extremely, not only from the standpoint of the Federal Reserve System, but from a personal one, that you f e e l compelled to tender your resignation as Governor o f the Federal Reserve Board. You have conducted the very responsible duties o f your o ffic e with a high degree o f s k ill, sometimes under extremely d i f f ic u lt circumstances, and your three years o f service have been of very d is tin c t b en efit to the Federal Reserve System. Our personal re la tio n s have been the pleasantest possible , and you w i l l carry away.with you from Washington not only the respect but the a ffe c tio n o f your associates on the Board, •Wishing you a l l success in the future., b e lie v e me, 'Very sin cerely yours., A,. W, MELLOW Secretary o f the Treasury, Hon. Roy A. Young, Federal Reserve Board, Treasury Bepar tment, Washington, D. C, | EOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, ! Monday, .September 8, 1930. U, TREASURY DEPARTMENT Tru 5 1R v E DATE STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, a t par and accrued in te re s t, through the Eederal Reserve Banks, an issue o f twelve month 3-3/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TS-1931, dated and bearing in te re s t from September 15, 1930, and matur ing September 15, 1931, The amount o f the o ffe r in g is $325,000,000, or thereabouts. A pplications w i l l be received at the Eederal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , a t par, Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f S eries TS-1930 and Treasury b i l l s dated July 14, 1930, both maturing September 15, 1930, but such subscriptions w i l l not be given p referred allotm ent. Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a te s w i l l have two in te re s t coupons attached payable March 15, 1931, and September 15, 1931 These c e r t ific a te s w i l l be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te re s t, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. About $350,000,000 o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness, about $51,000,000 in Treasury b i l l s , and about $35,000,000 in in te rest payments on the public debt become due and payable on September 15, 1930 The text o f the o f f i c i a l c ircu la r fo llow s: -3 - The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the au th ority o f the Act approved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t i fic a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TS-1931, dated and bearing in te rest from September 15, 1930, payable September 15, 1931, with in te re s t at the rate o f two and three-eighths per cent per annum, payable semi annually. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. Bearer c e r t ific a t e s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a t e s w i l l have two in terest coupons attached, payable March 15, 1931, and September 15, 1931. The c e r t ific a t e s o f said series sh all be exempt, both as to p rin cip al and in te re s t, from a l l taxation (except estate and inheritance taxes) now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, or by any lo c a l taxing authority. The c e r t ific a t e s o f th is series w i l l be accepted at par during such time and under such rules and regulations as sh all be prescribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity o f the c e r t ific a t e s . The c e r t ific a t e s o f this series w i l l be acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w ill not bear the circu la tio n p r iv ile g e . The rig h t is reserved to r e je c t any subscription and to a llo t less than the amount o f c e r t ific a t e s applied fo r and to close the sub scriptions a t any time without notice. The Secretary o f the Treasury -3 - also reserves the righ t to make allotment in f u l l upon applications fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotm ents upon, or to r e je c t , applica tions fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotm ents and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l he fin a l. Allotment n otices w i l l he sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotm ent w i l l he p u b licly announced. Payment a t par and accrued in te re s t fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d must he made on or before September 15, 1930, or on la t e r allotm ent. A fte r allotm ent and upon payment, Federal Reserve Banks may issue interim receipts pending d e liv ery o f the d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l he permitted to make payment by c re d it fo r c e r t ific a te s a llo t t e d to i t fo r i t s e l f and i t s customers up to any amount fo r which i t shall he q u a lifie d in excess o f ex istin g deposits, when so n o t ifie d by the Federal Reserve Bank o f i t s d is t r ic t . Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness o f Series TS-1930 and Treasury b i l l s dated July 14, 1930, both maturing September 15, 1930, w i l l be accepted, at par in the case o f the c e r t i f i cates and at maturity value in the case o f the Treasury b i l l s , in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s o f the series now o ffe re d which sh a ll be subscribed fo r and a llo t t e d , with an adjustment o f the in te rest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a t e s o f the series so paid fo r. As f is c a l agents o f the United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary o f the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Banks o f the respective d is t r ic t s . TREASURY DEPART!,1 !MT FOR lORUIEG- PAPERS, / Wednesday, Septemb\jyaO, 1930 Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue o f 2—3/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of Indebtedness, Series TS~*1931, dated September 15, 1930, maturing September 15, 1931, closed at the close o f business on Tuesday, September 9, 1930. Subscriptions received through, tno mails up to ten o ’ clock Wednesday morning, September 10th, w i l l be considered as having been received before the close of the subscription books. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Wednesday, September 10, 1930, STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury announces that a l l 3-l/2 per cent Treasury notes of Series A-1930-32 and Series B-1930-32 have been called fo r redemption on March 15, 1931, on which date the p rin cip al of any such notes then outstanding w i l l be payable, together with in terest then accrued thereon. Accordingly, in te rest on a l l 3-l/2 per cent Treasury notes of Series A-1930-32 and Series B-1930-32 w i l l cease on said redemption date, March 15, 1931. The Series A-1930-32 3-l/2 per cent notes were issued on March 15, 1927, and were made redeemable on six months’ notice on any in te rest payment date on and a fte r March 15, 1930. Of the $1,360,456,450 o r ig in a lly issued, there were outstanding as o f September 1st $649,076,350. The Series B-1930-32 notes were issued on September 15, 1927, and were made redeemable on six months* n otice on any in te re s t payment-date on and a ft e r September 15, 1930. Of the $619,495,700 o r ig in a lly issued, there were outstanding as of September 1st $500,303,700. P a rticu la r atten tion is in vited to the fa ct that the 3-l/2 per cent Treasury notes of Series C-1930-32 are not included in th is c a ll fo r redemption and to the further fa c t that the notes which have been ca lled for redemption should not be presented fo r redemption u n til March 15, 1931, or shortly p rio r thereto. The text o f the o f f i c i a l circu la r c a llin g the notes fo r redemp tion fo llow s: - 2 - To Holders o f 3jjff> Treasury Dotes o f Series A-1930-32 and B-1930-32: 1. Call fo r Redemption. - Public n otice is hereby given that, in accordance with the terms o f th e ir issue and pursuant to the provisions o f Treasury Department Circulars Nos. 379 and 387, dated March 8, 1927, and September 6, 1927, re s p e c tiv e ly , a l l o f the 3-|$ Treasury notes of Series Arl930-32, which by th eir terms were made redeemable on and a ft e r March 15, 1930, and a l l of the 3^fo Treasury notes o f Series B-1930-32, which by th e ir terms were made redeemable on and a fte r September 15, 1930, are ca lled fo r redemption on March 15, 1931, on which date the p rin cip al o f any such notes then outstanding w ill be payable, together with the in te re s t then accrued thereon. In tere st on a l l 3 Treasury notes o f Series A-1930-32 and Series B-1930-32 w i l l cease on said redemption date, March 15, 1931. 2. Presentation fo r Redemption At or A fte r March 15, 1931. - A ll 3^Jo Treasury notes o f Series A-1930-32 and Series B-1930-32 should be presented and surrendered fo r redemption to any Federal'Reserve Bank or branch, or to the Treasurer o f the United States at Washington, D. C. The notes must be d elivered in every case at the expense and ris k of the holder, and should be accompanied by appropriate w ritten advice. F a c ilit ie s fo r transportation of the notes by re gistered mail insured may be arranged between incorporated banks and trust companies and the Federal Reserve Banks, and holders may take advantage o f such arrangements, when a va ila b le, u t iliz in g such incorporated banks and trust companies as th eir own agents. Incorporated banks and trust companies are not agents o f the United States under th is circ u la r. 3. In tere st coupons. - In terest .coupons dated March 15, 1931, should be detached and c o lle c te d in regular course when due. Coupons dated September 15, 1931, and a l l coupons bearing dates subsequent - 3 - thereto, must "be attached to the notes when presented. In the event that any notes are presented fo r redemption with the September 15, 1931, or any subsequently dated coupons detached, the notes w ill nevertheless be redeemed, but the f u l l face amount of any such missing coupons w ill be deducted. 4. Any further information which may be desired as to redemp tion o f Treasury notes of Series A-1930-32 and B-1930-32 may be obtained from the Treasury Department, D ivision o f Loans and Currency, Washington, D. C ., or from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch. The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time or from time to time prescribe supplemental or amendatory ru les and regulations governing the matters covered by this circu la r FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, SEPTEMBER 11, 1930. treasury department Statement By Secretary Mellon. Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the issue of Treasury c e r t ific a t e s of indebtedness, dated September 15, 1930, Series TS-1931, 2-3/8 per cent, maturing September 15, 1931, closed at the close o f business on September 9, 1930. The reports received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g , which was fo r $325,000,000, or thereabouts, to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $1,237,000,000. As previously announced, subscriptions in payment fo r which Treasury c e r o ific a te s and Treasury b i l l s maturing September 15, 1930, were tendered were treated as cash subscriptions. Allotments on subscriptions were made as fo llo w s: A l l subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $1,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d in fu ll.; subscriptions in amounts over $1,000 but not exceeding $50,000 were a llo t t e d 70 per cent, but not le s s than $1,000 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $50,000 but not exceeding $100,000 were a llo t t e d 50 per cent, but not le s s than $35,000 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $100,000 but not exceeding $500,000 were a llo t t e d 40 per cent, but not le s s than $60,000 on any one subscription; and subscrip tions in amounts over $500,000 but not exceeding $1,000,000 were a llo tte d 30 per cent, but not less than $200,000 on any one subscription; sub scriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 were a llo t t e d 15 per cent, but not le s s than $300,000 on any one subscription. Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotm ents w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks* FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1930 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Secretary Mellon today announced that the to ta l amount o f subscrip tions received fo r the o ffe r in g o f 2-3/8 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness o f Seri’es TS-1931, dated September 15, 1930, maturing September 15, 1931, was $1,237,502,500, and that the to ta l o f subscrip tions a llo t t e d was $334,211,000, As previou sly announced, subscriptions in payment fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a t e s and Treasury b i l l s maturing September 15, 1930, were tendered were not given preferred allotment but were treated as cash subscriptions. The subscriptions and allotm ents were divided among the several Federal reserve d is t r ic ts and the Treasury as fo llow s: Federal reserve d is t r ic t Total subscriptions received: Total sub scrip— tion s a llo tte d : Boston New York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ $ Total 56,950,000 574,087,000 107 j711,500 61,028,000 52,321,000 60,320,500 160,184,500 18,779,000 4,137,000 20,662,000 50,072,000 71,233,500 16,500 $1,237,502,500 24,502,000 108,557,000 25,939,500 23,531,000 26,137,000 .29,753,000 44,409,000 8,447,000 2,244,500 5,873,000 21,200,000 13,605,500 12,500 $334,211,000 FOR RELEASEs MORNING PAPERS, Tuesday, October l f 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury gives notj co that tenders are in vited fo r Treasury h i]I s to the amount o f $100,000,000, or there abouts. They w i l l 'be 62—day h i l l s ; and w ill he sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders. Tenders w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o 'clo ck P« M., Eastern Standard time, on October 10, 1930. Tenders w i l l not be re ceived at the Treasury Department, Washington, The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be issued in two series, $50,000,000, or thereabouts, to be dated October 15, 1930, and maturing on December 16, 1930, and $50,000,000, or thereabouts, to be dated October 16, 1930, and maturing December 17, 1930. Bidders w i l l not be required^ or per mitted tc bid fo r a p a rticu la r series, but the Treasury w i l l apportion each accepted bid equally between the two series in so fa r as the minimum denomination o f $1,000 w i l l permit. At maturity the face amount o f the b i l l s w i l l be payable without in te re s t. The b i l l s w i l l be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $10,000, and $100,000 (maturity va lu e). I t is urged that tenders be made on the printed forms and fo r warded in the special envelopes which w i l l be supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon application therefor. fit? - 2~ No tender fo r an amount loss than $1,000 w i l l bo considered. Each tender must be in m ultiples o f $1,000. The p rice o ffe re d must be expressed on the basis o f 100, with not more than three decimal places, e. g ., 99.125. Fractions must not'be used. Tenders w i l l be accepted without cash deposit from incorporated banks and tru st companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment s e c u rities. Tenders from others must be accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent o f the face amount o f Treasury b i l l s applied fo r , unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guaranty o f pay ment by an incorporated bank or trust company. Immediately a ft e r the closin g hour fo r receip t o f tenders on October 10, 1930, a l l tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up to the closin g hour w i l l be opened and public an nouncement o f the acceptable p rices w i l l fo llo w as soon as possible th erea fter, probably on the fo llo w in g morning. The Secretary o f the Treasury expressly reserves the righ t to r e je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a l l o t less than the amount applied fo r , and his action in any such respect sh all be fin a l. Those submitting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance or re je c tio n th ereof. With respect to bidders whose tenders have been accepted, such advice w i l l state the amount o f each series a llo t t e d . Payment at the p rice o ffe re d fo r Treasury b i l l s a llo t t e d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a va ila b le funds on October 15, 1930, fo r the b i l l s a llo tte d S7 7 -3 bearing that date o f issue, and on October 16, 1930, fo r b i l l s a llo tte d bearing the la t t e r date o f issue. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be exempt, as to p rin cip al and in te re s t, and any gain from the sale or other d isp ositio n thereof w*ill also be exempt, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. Ho loss from the sale or other d isp ositio n o f the Treasury b i l l s sh all be allowed as a deduction, or otherwise recognized, fo r the purposes o f any tax now or h erea fter imposed by the United States or any o f it s possessions. Treasury Department Circular No* 418, as amended, dated June 25, 1930, and this notice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, prescribe the terms o f the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions o f th eir issue. Copies o f the circu la r may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or branch thereof. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Thursday, October 0, 1950. treasury department Statement by Secretary Mellon The statement o f Representative I^yrns, o f Tennessee, appearing in th is morn ing’ s press, has been ca lled to my atten tion . Representative Byrns charges that the Treasury Daily Statement fo r September 30th, which showed a surplus fo r the fir s t quarter o f the fis c a l year, is "a p o l i t ic a l campaign document,” rather than ”an honest, straightforw ard, unbiased business statem ent.” Mr. Byrns goes on to say that the Treasury is ’’ attempting to create a fic t it io u s surplus by withdrawing from the sinking fund sums*legally required fo r the reduction o f the public deb t.” These are serious accusations. They are due, however, to a complete misun derstanding o f the situ a tio n , which is rather surprising in so experienced and in te llig en t a member o f the House o f Representatives, who would hardly at any time other than the month preceding e le c tio n display such a convenient ignorance of Treasury finances. Mr. Byrns’ charges are evid en tly based on the fa c t that only $65,000,000 were applied to debt retirement on account o f the sinking fund during the f i r s t quarter o f the f is c a l year 1931, as compared with $236,S^6^000 during the f i r s t quarter of the f is c a l year 1930. The explanation is simple enough. During the f i r s t three months o f the fis c a l year 1930 United States Government bonds and Treasury notes were s e llin g at a discount. I t was, th erefo re, good business fo r the Treasury to take advantage o f th is situ a tio n and to r e t ir e them at that time. Accordingly, smme $286,000,000 o f 3j$ Treasury notes were pur chased at prices varying from 96 20/32 to 98 30/32. The p re v a ilin g p rice was 98, and over $198,000,000 were purchased at that fig u re , thus e ffe c tin g a saving of almost $4,000,000. During the f i r s t three months of the present fis c a l year United States Government bonds and Treasury notes have sold consistently at a premium. By applying the sinking fund appropriation to the retirement o f the Treasury notes which have been ca lled on March 15th, next, and which w i l l be retired at par, the Treasury avoids the payment o f a premium. Accordingly, the • not |o |; I | ' || Sif 1 - #1 '. 2- sinking fund purchases during the f i r s t quarter o f this fis c a l year have been lim ited to the minimum amount made advisable by the established program of financing. Just a word as to the charge that funds are being "withdrawn from the sink ing fund" to meet the ordinary expenses of the Government, with its im plication that we are drawing on a tru st fund set up fo r a s p e c ific purpose. I t is d i f f i cult to understand how the ranking Democratic member o f the Committee on Appro priations could f a l l into such an erro r. Mr. Byrns must know that debt r e t ir e ments on account o f the sinking fund are made by virtu e o f a continuing appro priation, ava ila b le throughout the f i s c a l year, and, as in the case o f every other appropriation, constitute a charge on the general revenues o f the Govern ment, and that no sp ecia l fund in the nature o f a tru st fund is ever set up fo r this purpose. Moreover, he is u tte r ly mistaken in his assumption that the amount of debt retirement on account of the sinking fund during the present f i r s t quarter is unusually low. Omitting the fis c a l year 1929, in the f i r s t quarter of which the Third L ib erty Loan matured, and the f is c a l year 1930, as to which the explanation is given above, sinking fund retirements during the f i r s t quarter o f th is f i s c a l year are not out of lin e with the sinking fund r e t ir e ments made during the f i r s t quarter o f any year from 1921 to 1931. For instance, in 1922 the fig u re was §81,000,000; in 1923, §52,000,000; in 1924, §77,000,000; in 1925, §118,000,000; in 1926, §82,000,000; in 1927, §134,000,000; and in 1928;. §74,000,000. In the lig h t o f these fa c ts , I leave i t to the public to decide which sta te ment can f a i r l y be described as "a p o l i t ic a l campaign document", the Treasury statement of September 30th or Representative Esyrns’ statement o f October 9th. FOR RELEASE,- MORNING PAPERS, SATURDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY ACTING- SECRETARY MILLS Acting Secretary M ills announced, today that the tenders fo r $100,000,000, or thereabouts, of 62-day Treasury B i l l s ‘which were o ffered on October 7, 1930, were opened at the Federal Reserve on October 10, 1930'* Banks The Treasury’ s e a r lie r announcement provided that the b i l l s would be issued in two series, $50,000,000, or there abouts, dated October 15, 1930, and maturing December 16, 1930, and $50,000,000, or thereabouts, dated October 16, 1930, and maturing December 17, 1930, the accepted bids to be apportioned by the Treasury equally between the two series, in so fa r as the minimum denomination o f $1,000 w i l l permit. . Tnc to ta l amount applied fo r was $360,964,000. The highest bid made was 99.736, equivalent to an in te rest ra te o f about 1.53 per cent on an annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.671, equivalent to an in te re s t rate of about 1.91 per cent on an annual basis. The to ta l amount of bids accepted was $102,525,000, o f which $51,262,000 have been apportioned to the series dated October 15, 1930, maturing December 16, 1930, and $51,263,000 have been apportioned to the series dated October 16, 1930, maturing December 17, 1930. o f Treasury B ills to be issued i s about 99.680, bank discount basis is about 1.85 per cent. The average p rice The average rate on a THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY Washington October IS, 1930. Dear Mr. Alvord; I have received your l e t t e r of October 16th tendering your resignation as Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury and asking to be re lie v e d of your duties on November 1st. I t is with great regret that I accept your resignation and see you and your service at the Treasury. In your work you have shown a b ilit y , energy, resourcefulness and u n tirin g devotion to duty, which have been of great value to the Treasury and to me. You have been p a rtic u la rly h elp fu l in presenting the Treasury’ s viewpoint to committees of Congress in connection with revenue, t a r i f f , and other le g is la tio n ; and you have also had much o f the re s p o n s ib ility in the preparation of rules and regulations governing the Treasury’ s adminis tra tion o f these and other laws. In addition to this you rendered valuable service in developing the Treasury program fo r the avoidance o f in tern ational double taxation. For a l l these and other services which you have rendered to the Treasury and fo r the assistance which you have given to me personally, I wish to thank you and to wish fo r you the greatest success and happiness in the new work to which you are going. Sincerely yours, (Signed) A. W. MELLON Secretary o f the Treasury. E. C. Alvord, Esq., Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasurjr, Treasury Department, FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, SATURDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT SPEECH TO BE DELIVERED BY HONORABLE OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, IN MECHANICS BUILDING, BOSTON,MASS., ON FRIDAY EVENING, OCTOBER 2U, 1930» Note: For f u l l text o f speech see Subject F ile : Secretary*s Speeches FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1930. Address of A. W. Mellon Secretary of the Treasury from Station WMAL, Washington at 10 o ’ clock P. M., Eastern Standard Time, October 29, 1930. We are in the midst o f a campaign in volvin g the e le c tio n o f one-third of the United States Senate, the en tire membership o f the House o f Representatives, and a vast number o f State, county and municipal o ffic e r s . Such a bien n ial e le c tio n , in an o f f year when the Presidency is not involved, ra re ly turns on a s in g le, c le a r cut issue. The s itu a t'o usually too confused fo r that; and i t is too confused today. In tne coming e le c tio n candidates w i l l be chosen in some States because o f th e ir views on p roh ib ition ; in others because o f the t a r i f f or farm r-relief or some other measure; and, in p r a c tic a lly a l l cases, the person ality o f the candidates themselves w i l l la rg e ly a ffe c t the fin a l re su lt. On top o f a ll th is , the situ ation w i l l be fu rther confused by the e ffo r t s o f the Democratic candidates to make an issue o f the present commercial and indu strial depression and to charge the Republican Party w ith re s p o n s ib ility fo r matters beyond it s con trol. I t is not unnatural, perhaps, that the opposing Party should seek to , c a p ita liz e d is s a tis fa c tio n w ith e x is tin g conditions. have always been prone to do th is . P o l i t i c a l p a rties But any one whose memory goes back even a few years knows that depressions have always follow ed periods o f over-expansion, regardless o f went p o l i t ic a l party is .in power. Purther more, such depressions have been, almost without exception, the resu lt o f world conditions and consequently have not been confined to any one country but nave been world-wide in extent. -2 - My own memory goes took to 1873 when, during the Adm inistration o f President Grant, there was a complete collapse o f c re d it and commodity prices, both in th is country and in Europe, due to over-expansion and excessive speculation. The same thing happened in 1893 under President Cleveland and was due, as "before, to World conditions. Again, in 1920, a major c r is is arose, th is time becoming acute under the la s t Democratic Administration and extending into the f i r s t year o f the incoming Republican Administration. That c r is is , as a l l o f us remember, extended to p r a c tic a lly every country in the world, and was due prim arily to tne liq u id a tio n o f commodity values which had become unduly in fla te d during the war. How we are in the midst o f another business and in d u stria l depression. Like the e a r lie r ones, i t is world-wide in extent and has resu lted from much the same causes. I t was not caused by speculation in stocks, though that was a fa c to r, o f course, in the situ ation . I t s underlying causes were deeper than that and may be traced p rim arily to over-production o f certa in commodities, esp ecia lly raw m aterials, both in th is country and abroad. Production processes in a gricu ltu re and industry had been enlarged throughout the world to supply the needs created by four years o f almost universal war. Those needs having been supplied in the ten years that had elapsed since the war ended, there developed a lack o f balance between production and consumption in certain commodities, resu ltin g in a fa l l i n g o f f in p rices o f these commodities and a consequent collapse in the buying power o f many countries, accentuated in some cases by p o l i t ic a l uphoavals w e ll as d islo ca tio n o f trade. - 3 - We are now going through the process of readjustment, I do not underestimate i t s seriousness or the su fferin g i t must cause to many innocent people whose savings or jobs have been swept away through no fa u lt o f th e ir own. We must a l l do what we can to help the man who is in d i f f ic u lt i e s but, meanwhile, i t is w ell to get a clea r conception, i f we can, o f those unseen forces in the grip o f which we fin d ourselves, and o f how we can best work together as a nation in combating them. We have found by experience that what a ffe c ts one country adversely, in time a ffe c ts the other countries a lso, Wo one nation, among the clo sely -k n it nations o f the world, can long expect to escape a world condition. But we in th is country were fortunate in being so w ell prepared to cope with the emergency when i t came. We were p a rtic u la rly fortunate in having in the White House a man who had the knowledge and the experience that p ec u lia rly f i t t e d him to deal w ith the situ ation . Throughout h is career, both during the war and afterwards, President Hoover has exhibited a genius fo r organization and fo r quick and d ec isive action . These were the q u a litie s that made him so e ff e c t iv e in dealing with the situ ation la s t autumn; and I fe e l that too much cred it can not be given him fo r h is very rea l and constructive contribution in m obilizin g the business forces o f the nation at a c r i t i c a l moment in i t s h istory. -4 - In so fa r as the in tern al organization o f th is country is concerned» we enjoy one advantage over most other nations. America is more nearly self-con tain ed , as regards both production and consumption, than any other country in the world. Hot only do we produce most o f the goods which we requ ire, hut we have a domestic market o f tremendous purchasing power, capable o f consuming not less than nine-tenths o f a l l that we produce. Any study o f consumption in th is country shows what America’ s enormous purchasing power means, not only to industry and agricu ltu re here hut to the rest o f the world a lso . I t proves con clu sively that our w ell-bein g as a nation rests on a s o lid foundation and that our p rosp erity in the future, as in the past, w i l l he based prim a rily on our own domestic purchasing power - a purchasing power to which no lim its can he set so long as we continue to maintain the wage scale and standard o f liv in g which in the past have created an ever expanding market fo r goods and services. Ho one can make any predictions as to how long i t w i l l take fo r our country to make the readjustment necessary in a time lik e th is . But o f one thing we can he certain ; w ith our great in tern al organization, our vast resources, our unparalleled domestic buying power and the -5 - indomitable s p ir it o f our people, we sh all be among the f i r s t o f a l l the nations to recover and to resume the onward march o f progress. Now as to the part which the Adm inistration can play in hastening that recovery. Except fo r the exigencies o f p o lit ic s , no thoughtful person, I f e e l sure, would make the assertion that e ith e r th is or any other Adm inistration could be held responsible fo r the conditions now a f f l i c t i n g th is coim try and the world. We have not yet learned how to avoid in d u stria l depressions and c e rta in ly no one, who gives any consideration to underlying causes, w i l l charge any p o lit ic a l party or group o f men or even nations w ith re s p o n s ib ility fo r a depression which is world-wide in extent and could not have been prevented, so fa r as one can humanly see, by any action that might have been taken. There is only one challenge that, in fa irn ess , can be made, and that is : have those in charge o f the Government conducted i t s a ffa ir s with prudence and fo re s ig h t, so that the Government now fin ds i t s own house in order and the fin a n c ia l structure o f the country in ta ct and in a p o sitio n to meet a l l leg itim a te demands that may be made upon it? That challenge the present Adm inistration is prepared to meet and welcomes the opportunity to submit i t s record to the country. I t can be said a t once that the Government’ s finances are in a sound condition. surplus. The la s t f is c a l year closed w ith a s a tis fa c to ry Up to June 20th la s t , $1 , 051,.000,COO o f the public debt had been r e tir e d since the beginning o f the present Adm inistration. 6 This, added to the amounts which have "been re tir e d since the Republican Party came into o f f ic e in 1921, makes a to ta l o f nearly 8 b illio n d o lla rs o f public debt which has been paid o ff. The importance of these debt retirem ents may be -seen in the fa c t that they, together with refunding operations at lower rates of in te re s t, have resulted in a saving to the Government of in te re s t payments of nearly a m illio n d o lla rs a day. The t a r i f f has been revised in accordance with the promise o f the Administration to extend the b e n e fits of p rotection to agricu ltu re. The b i l l is not fr e e from d efects. No t a r i f f b i l l is . But th is measure at le a s t, by i t s own terms, provides the means whereby errors and in eq u a lities may be adjusted. I f the fle x ib le provisions are in t e llig e n t ly applied, and I b e lie v e they w i l l be by the excellen t personnel which the President has secured fo r the T a r if f Commission, they should go fa r toward making another re visio n o f the t a r i f f by Congress unnecessary fo r many years to come. This, o f i t s e l f , is o f inestim able b e n e fit to business, fo r nothing i s more unfavorable to prosp erity than ■uncertainty and constant readjusting o f economic conditions to le g is la t iv e enactments. I might add that, most assuredly, i t w i l l not be a contribution to business s t a b ilit y i f a Democratic m ajority should be returned to Congress and should begin a l l over again the long period o f business uncertainty that must of necessity accompany t a r iff agitation in Congress. The Administration has made a further effort to find some solution of the difficulties with which agriculture is confronted in this country. Under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing Act, the Federal Farm Board is assisting farmers to set up their own marketing agencies, owned and controlled by the cooperatives that form them, so that these organisa tions are the marketing agencies of the farmers themselves and are not, in any sense of the word, governmental agencies. It is only a beginning, of course, but it is a step in the right direction; and, when these agencies have been thoroughly organized, it is believed that they w ill offer a means whereby the farmers* products can be marketed in an orderly manner, while at the same time these associations, because of their relationship to their members, w ill be in a position to advise against unwise expansion of acreage and over-production of crops* So much for the manner in which the Government*s a ffairs have been conducted. Hot only has the Government kept its own house in order but it has held its e lf in readiness to meet unexpected emergencies that arise from time to time and call for prompt and decisive action. The Government was faced with such a situation in the current business depression. The scope of governmental activities was necessarily limited, but within those limits the President acted with decision and courage. Accustomed to deal with great emergencies and with a I •.. ... . . ~ a , - * ■ , . . . . . . , knowledge-"born.of wide experience, . he c a lled together leaders in business, industry and labor, and secured an agreement, on the one . hand,. to maintain the. existing-.wage scale, and.keep up .employment so... fa r as p ossib le, and,on th e :other -hand, t o .avoid.labor disputes,and c o n flic ts between employers and employees. That agreement has been-kept-.and has been •o f inestimable, .benefit in .the. present emergency* • • Jt was a ls o ( agreed .that both business and the Government should, carry out, as promptly as p ossib le, a l l needed construction fo r which . funds might be a va ila b le. As a re s u lt, the ra ilro a d s, public u t i l i t i e s and other great enterprises have pushed construction work during the la s t eight months, I'n a ddition , a vast amount of public, improvements are under construction by States and m u n icipalities; and,,this amount w i l l doubtless be,,g re a tly augmented by bond issues to be authorized .in the coming -elections*- ■ . . . . . In so fa r as the Federal Government is concerned, the Treasury and the Post O ffic e Departments have been making every e ff o r t to expedite public bu ildin g construction throughout the. country, January 1 st, 66 bu ilding . . . Since p ro jec ts have been placed under contract and. 21 buildings have been completed in the country at la rg e* Plans are;.being rushed fo r $163,000,000 worth o f addition al construction and i t is estimated that a to ta l of $75,000,000 w i l l be spent throughout the. country, in the current fis c a l year as compared.with a to ta l of" $65,000,000 during a l l the three preceding years, , . • - 9 - The amount to he spent th is year w i l l he increased in subsequent years under authorizations already made* But i t should he borne in mind that th is public bu ildin g program is not in any respect a wasteful or unnecessary expenditure o f the public funds to meet an emergency situ a tion . On the contrary, the buildings now under way or contemplated, in Washington and throughout the country, are essen tial fo r the housing and proper functioning o f the Government * s various a c t iv it ie s and w i l l make i t unnecessary fo r the Government to continue paying expensive ren tals in many c it ie s , as i t does at present. Furthermore, by bu ilding now when contracts can be made on a basis o f more than 15 per cent lower than even a few years ago, the Government w i l l save money and at the same time provide employment and stimulate a c t iv it y in many lin e s which are a ffe c te d d ir e c t ly or in d ir e c tly by the bu ildin g industry. This perhaps is one o f the most p ra c tic a l measures which the Government can undertake in helping to meet the pressing and a l l important question of unemployment. In order to deal with th is question d ir e c t ly and to co-ordinate the various agencies e x is tin g fo r th is purpose, the President has appointed a national committee which w i l l have behind i t a l l the organization and p restige o f the Government. I have said enough to show that the Administration is doing a l l i t can both to a lle v ia t e su fferin g and to hasten recovery from the present depression. I t can not work m iracles. The most i/ ) $ ■V - 10 - that any administration can do is to keep the boat steady and headed in the rig h t d irection -until the storm "blows over; and that the President has shown he is w ell able to do. He can not be held responsible fo r the extent or violen ce o f the storm, any more than he can be blamed fo r the drought which added one more plague to those that beset us la s t summer. President Hoover has shown him self a man capable o f dealing with great emergencies. I am confident that he w ill lead the country out o f it s present d i f f ic u lt i e s ; but i f he is to do so with a minimum o f fr ic t io n and lo ss of time, h is hands should not be tie d by a Congress con trolled by h is p o lit ic a l opponents. divided authority* I t is not a time fo r I t is rather a time fo r strong and united action and, in asking support fo r the President and the Administration, I do so in the b e l i e f that in th is way we shall atta in most quickly that f u l l measure o f economic recovery which is in evita b le in a nation so s e lf- r e lia n t and so ju s t ifia b ly confident o f the future. yw FOR RELEASE, MORNING"PAPERS, '-THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1930. SPEECH TO BE DELIVERED BY HON; OGDEN L. MILLS, / * I ¿f' UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ' .. AT PERTH AMBOY, w P jQ , / ON WEDNESDAY EVENING, OCTOBER 29, 1930. ¿J A On Tuesday next, the c itiz e n s of the United States w i l l ele c t a new House o f Representatives and one-third o f the members o f the United States Senate. I t l i e s in th e ir hands to determine whether the President is to have the support and cooperation of the Congress, or, in other words, whether we are to have team-work and unity o f e ff o r t in Washington or whether, by turning over the le g is la t iv e branch o f the government to the opposition party, we are to have divided au th ority, re su ltin g, at best, in a stalemate and, at worst, in confusion, f u t i l e controversy, and loss of confidence. The decision must not be made l ig h t ly , but with a deep sense o f re s p o n s ib ility . The times are too serious to ju s t ify any other course. The en tire world i s in the midst of one o f those periods o f deep economic depression which brin g misery and unhappiness to m illio n s o f in dividu als, and in many regions threaten p o l i t ic a l and economic s t a b ilit y . Even our own country has not escaped the universal malady and, though le s s seriously a ffe c te d , i t is undeniable that there is a very d e fin ite slackening in our economic a c t iv it y below the normal le v e l. nor f u t ile complaints w ill get us anywhere. Neither, unjust criticis m s What we need is courage, fa it h in ourselves and in our fu tu re, and, above a l l , a united e ff o r t in the over coming o f d i f f i c u l t i e s which, however severe, can, in the very nature of things, be but temporary. Disorganization in government, through d iv is io n - 2- o f au th ority, is c le a r ly not a step in the rig h t d ire c tio n . Herbert Hoover is to be the Captain o f our ship in any event fo r the next two and a h a lf years. Are we to e n lis t a crew that may be r e lie d on to cooperate with the skipper in n avigating the ship through stormy seas, or to handicap him with one much more in terested in obtaining con trol o f the vessel than in reaching port? We may approach the problems created by e x is tin g conditions from two points o f view: f i r s t , the immediate and pressing need o f m itiga tin g unnecessary hardship, tid in g over the e x is tin g emergency by a l l means.in our power through cooperative e ff o r t ; and, secondly, from a long-time stand poin t, we may address ourselves to the task o f how best to avoid sim ilar depressions in the fu ture. But, whether we look at the present situ ation with a view to the immediate fu tu re, or from the standpoint o f our more distant prospects, in eith er event we are fortunate in having as our Chief Executive a man who, by tra in in g, experience, human sympathy and broad knowledge, is supremely w e ll-q u a lifie d to deal with eith er aspect o f the problems. Hoping to p r o fit by discontent, our opponents, as E lection Day approaches, spare no pains in emphasizing the dark side o f the pictu re. But the grea ter the d is tre s s or threatened d is tre s s , the greater the need o f g iv ing our whole-hearted support to the President; fo r he has no equal in the handling o f human d i f f i c u l t i e s in the mass. The children and parents o f Belgium, France, Russia, Finland, Germany, Poland, and o f our own lower Mis sis s ip p i States, t e s t i f y to his s k i l l , his fo re s ig h t and his humanity in solvin g the problems o f food, sh elter and health. Is th is the time to deny him our support at the behest o f an opposition which, in many months o f lea th e rlunged campaigning, has fa ile d to develop a sin gle p o lic y o f it s own or td -3- o ffe r one constructive suggestion? In the meanwhile, the President, from the day i t became evident that the tid e o f p rosp erity had receded and the bare rocks o f adversity were in s ig h t, with the decision and broad visio n ch ara cteristic o f the man, began the work o f m obilizing our resources to meet the emergency. You a l l remember hov/ la s t f a l l the leaders o f great indu strial en terprises, railw ays, u t i l i t i e s and business houses, and the leaders o f labor were ca lled in , how there was an agreement to maintain the rate o f wages, to d is trib u te work as evenly as p o ssib le, to urge e f fo rt in production and to prevent c o n flic t and dispute; how the cooperative e ffo r ts resu ltin g from those meetings and from the further movement undertaken under the leadership o f the President by the Federal, State and municipal governments, resulted in the carrying out o f a vast program o f public and other works, e ffe c tin g an expansion of the expenditures fo r these purposes exceeding those of even the boom year o f 1929. Who can doubt but that fo r the prompt and vigorous action o f the President, and the magnificent coopera tion o f those who were only too glad to follow his leadership, conditions last w inter and today would have been in fin it e ly worse than they are now? Does anyone in th is audience doubt, does any thoughtful man anywhere in the United States doubt but that i f we lend the President our whole-hearted support and cooperation, a l l w i l l be done th is w inter that can be done to • re lie v e s u ffe rin g and d istress and to move forward step by step to the point where we can once more resume the onward march o f .American economic p ro s p e rityl I t is w e ll to remember, vrtien that time comes, that these down-swings do not wipe out the progress achieved during the forward movements, and that when the on- - 4- ward, march is resumed once more, we s ta rt not from the old mark, hut from the new. This is an in f i n i t e l y important fa c t to us who have progressed at such a remarkably rapid rate during recent years, who have witnessed a steady expansion in the already la rge purchasing power o f our hundred and twenty m illio n people, an improved and expanded plan t, grea ter e ffic ie n c y in production and d istrib u tio n , and as a resu lt an ever-widening market fo r a l l manner o f goods and services. Here is a re a l basis fo r prosp erity, and in these days o f possimism, i t is w e ll to remind you that these basic fa cto rs are s t i l l present. Given such a fundamentally favorable situ a tion as ex ists in th is country, i t is ir r it a t in g and puzzling to he confronted w ith period ic de pressions. They seem somehow unnecessary. And yet to me the progress we have achieved in th is country, the marvel o f the present economic order, with the almost unlim ited promise which i t seems to hold out to the average man in the way o f m aterial betterment, are i n f in it e ly more impressive than any temporary recession. With the economic world in balance, increased pro duction and increased purchasing power seem to supplement each other so na tu ra lly that we accept the two phenomena as a matter o f course. But l e t any considerable group o f people produce what is n ! t wanted, or more than is wan , le t th e ir goods f a i l to fin d a market, and th e ir impaired purchasing power immediately a ffe c ts the market fo r goods produced by other groups. A n ic e ly adjusted balance is disturbed, the movement spreads and almost before we know i t we are confronted w ith the phenomenon known as a business depression and the most b a fflin g o f problems. I t is only in times lik e these that we r e a liz e the in tr ic a c ie s o f the system and how necessary i t is to analyze and determine - 5- what are the co n tro llin g and determining forces* When one considers what i t means to have a fr e e ly com petitive economic order,, such as p reva ils throughout most o f the world to-day, in which men engage fr e e ly in a wide v a rie ty o f sp e cia lize d a c t i v i t i e s fo r a money income, which is spent hy them also quite fr e e ly upon a wide v a rie ty of commodities, and in response to frequently unstable preferences, and when one appreciates the importance o f the psychological fa c to r and the tendency of human "beings to move a l l together in one d ire c tio n or the other at the same time, i t is easy to understand how complicated and susceptible is our whole economic structure. I t explains why period ic depressions and readjustments seem almost to be in e v ita b le . Whether they can be e n tir e ly elim inated is certa in ly questionable, but that they can be fu rth er m itigated is not too much to expect. A ft e r a l l , there was a time when we were s a t is fie d with a banking and c re d it system subject only to c o rrective checks and balances that autom atically became operative only when unsound developments had ca rried us to periods o f c o s tly and pain fu l c ris e s . With the organization o f the Federal Reserve System and the consequent c e n tra liz a tio n o f re s p o n s ib ility fo r the supervision o f c re d it developments, we made a great step forward. The Federal Reserve Act has not only given added strength to our c re d it structure, but has provided us with a group o f o f f i c i a l s whose duty i t is to study changing business and c red it conditions in order that business and commerce may b en efit from an enlightened supervision o f banking and c re d it developments. We have not yet reached p erfectio n in the use o f th is instrument, but I b e lie v e that a l l w i l l admit that it s creation was a step in the rig h t d ire c tio n and that i t has functioned, even in these ea rly years o f i t s existence, w ith untold ben efit to the country. - 6 - The Federal Reserve System did not come into existence u n til a ft e r many years o f in tensive study and work. The analogy is perhaps not quite leg itim a te, hut i f a proper solution of one o f the great economic problems has been found and suitable machinery has been evolved fo r dealing with one o f the important business fa c to rs , namely, that of cred it, is i t too much to hope that in tensive study o f a l l o f the other complicated and in tr ic a te fa cto rs may y ie ld sim ila rly fr u it fu l results? The President has proposed that “ The whole range o f our experience from th is boom and slump should be placed under accurate examination with a view to determination of what can be done to achieve greater s t a b ilit y fo r the fu tu re, both in prevention and in remedy.11 To me th is is a most constructive suggestion. We have made such enormous strid es in the gathering of current business s t a t is t ic s , in formation can be so re a d ily , ra p id ly and w idely d iffu sed , that we may look forward to the day when the business course o f the future may be charted by the lig h t o f adequate information and knowledge and in accordance with recognized rules o f conduct, resu ltin g in greater sa fety to individual indu stries, and in more assured s t a b ilit y in our economic l i f e . There is , perhaps, no greater problem that confronts the modern world than the development o f means and methods o f avoiding the c y c lic a l depressions, or at le a s t o f m itiga tin g th e ir se v e rity and duration. I know of no man so w ell q u a lifie d to furnish the leadership in such a move ment as the President o f the United States* I f we look, then, e ith e r to the immediate or to the more distant future, i t would seem, that s e lf- in t e r e s t demands that we should not change our Doard o f d irecto rs at th is time. When circumstances im peratively c a ll fo r unity, we must not have d iv is io n ; when cooperation should be the order o f the .day, we should not enthrone opposition; and, c le a r ly , when the immediate task is construction, we should not turn to those who cannot view a brick except in the lig h t o f something to be hurled. But th is administration is e n title d to your support not only by virtu e of what i t can accomplish, but because o f what i t has already done. In the face o f very d i f f ic u lt conditions and the kind o f partisan opposition from which i t might f a i r l y have claimed exemption, the adm inistration has carried w ell nigh to completion the program on which i t was elected . We pledged ourselves to such fu rth er reduction of the tax burden as the condition o f the Treasury might from time to time permit. Taxes have been reduced by no less than $160,000,000 th is year, We pledged ourselves to continue to reduce our national debt in accordance with a w ell-esta b lish ed program. From March 4., 1029, to June 30, 1930, the public debt vn-as reduced by a b i llio n and fift y - o n e m illio n d o lla rs; and a fte r both debt and tax reduction, we closed the fis c a l year with a surplus o f $184,000,000. We pledged ourselves to re vise the t a r i f f in accordance with pro te c tiv e p rin c ip le s , and more s p e c ific a lly with a view to adjusting ex is tin g discrepancies between a gricu ltu ral and other in du stries. I t has been done. We pledged ourselves to adhere to the established fo reig n debt p o lic y and to-make provision fo r the settlement o f the claims o f our citize n s and o f our government against Germany, The la s t o f the war debt settlements has been r a t i f i e d and signed, and an agreement has been made with Germany providing fo r the repayment o f the costs o f our Army o f Occupation and o f the ju st claims o f our c itiz e n s . We pledged ourselves to bu ild up c o rd ia l in tern ational understanding that w ill make world peace a permanent r e a lit y . The three-power naval pact, which became fi n a l ly e ffe c t iv e la s t Monday, is an epoch-making contribution to the cause of world peace by bringing to a h a lt fo r the f i r s t time in h isto ry com petitive building. We pledged ourselves to the enactment o f le g is la tio n creating a Federal Farm Board, clothed with the necessary powers to promote the estab lishment o f a farm marketing system o f farmer-owned and co n trolled s t a b ili zation corporations or association s, and the establishment o f a Federal system of organization fo r cooperative and ord erly marketing of farm products* I t has been done in spite o f the e ff o r t s of the opposition to destroy th is constructive e ff o r t by attaching to i t the unsound proposal known as the Export Debenture Plan, which contemplated subsidizing exports from the Federal Treasury and dumping in the world markets* We pledged ourselves to increased Federal support fo r improved highways* Appropriations have been increased from the usual $75,000,000 yearly to $125,000,000. We pledged our opposition to government ownership or operation of our Merchant Marine and to the promotion of i t s development under p riva te ownership and management. Since March 4, 1929, the Shipping Board has sold a to ta l of 189 ships, while new routes established under p riva te auspices since that date require 51 new ships, aggregating 467,500 tons and costing approximately $200,000,000. We pledged ourselves to the reorganization o f the government supervision o f radio f a c i l i t i e s . Acting under Congressional authority, the Federal Radio Commission has been reorganized and established upon a permanent basis. We pledged ourselves to the continued development of our inland and in tercoastal waterways, and an enlarged national program fo r the development of inland railw ays has been worked out a d m in istratively and le g is la t iv e ly by the President and Congress. We pledged ourselves to fu lle r and more adequate r e l i e f fo r our disabled veterans. This has been accomplished. - 9 - Back in the days when I used to campaign against former-Governor Smith, one of h is fa v o rite phrases was, " L e t 's consult the record." there i t is . W ell,, On that record we go to the Country with complete confidence* There c^re two measures which X fe e l ju s t ifie d in sin glin g out fo r further discussion— the t a r i f f and the A gricu ltu ral Marketing Act. I do not desire to discuss the t a r i f f eith er from the standpoint of the p ro tective p rin cip le to which th is country is committed, or from the standpoint o f ra tes, which, while they lend themselves to a l l kinds o f p o l i t ic a l misrepresentation and d is to rtio n , cannot adequately "be discussed in the time at my disposal. But there is one featu re which should he called to your p a rticu la r attention, and that is the so—ca lled f le x ib le provision. One great fa u lt about t a r i f f b i l l s in the past has been th e ir lack of f l e x i b i l i t y and our in a b ilit y to modify rates to meet ra p id ly changing economic conditions without resortin g to the cumbersome and none too sa tis factory method of g e n e r a l- ta r iff revision . The Congress cannot undertake a general t a r i f f re v is io n oftener tnan once every seven or eight years unless a l l other public business is to be neglected and we are to su ffer at frequent in te rv a ls a l l of the uncertainty, confusion, and costs incident to a complete re v is io n of ra tes. Nor is i t disputed that in the interim the new situ ations which a ris e almost from month to month in an economic world in which ¿’evolutionary changes are the rule rather than the exception w i l l render many established rates obsolete overnight. Under rapid ly changing conditions, i t is uneconomic and unjust to freeze t a r i f f rates over long periods o f time. Moreover, provision should be made fo r correcting such errors as are bound to creep into any t a r i f f re visio n and to enable us to review schedules which experience has demonstrated are out o f lin e with actual conditions. - 10 - “What, then, is the businesslike solution of th is adm ittedly p lica ted and d i f f i c u l t economic problem? com Let us have a T a r if f Commission composed o f trained, w e ll-q u a lifie d and unbiased men; l e t them in each in stance determine the fa cts and, based on those fa c ts and the p rin cip les and rules la id down by the Congress fo r th e ir guidance, make th e ir recommendations to the President. Give him the authority to make th eir recommendations e ffe c t iv e by proclamation. This i s exactly what the present provision does. In addition, i t provides fo r open hearings and fo r making public the recommenda tions o f the Commission. Such a plan conforms to the fundamental p rin cip les which should govern the adm inistration o f a p ro tective t a r i f f law under present-day conditons. The in te re s ts of the country w i l l best be served i f , a fte r Congress has la id down a p o lic y and enacted a general ra te revisio n , subsequent readjustments are brought about s o le ly on the basis of economic considerations and fre e from a l l of the p o l i t ic a l and partisan controversy which h isto ry has demonstrated is inseparable from le g is la t iv e t a r i f f re v is io n . The p rin cip le that u nderlies the A gricu ltu ral Marketing Act is simple enough. The farmers of the country are to be encouraged and assisted in form ing strong organizations through which they, a ctin g c o lle c t iv e ly , can control the marketing and, u ltim a tely, the production o f th e ir products. In other words, the same business p rin c ip le s that govern the conduct o f other in dustries are to be applied to the a gricu ltu ra l industry. The major reason agricu ltu re has fa ile d to keep pace is that i t has operated as an in dividu al en terprise, competing with organized e ffo r t s in other in du stries by in dividu al action and planning, as compared with c o lle c t iv e thinking and acting. L e ft to themselves, the work o f organizing six and a h a lf m illio n farmers, scattered over a vast area, would be altogeth er too slow a process» There is need o f assistance, leadership and fin a n c ia l help. These the - - 11 r Government is furnishing in the in te rest of the national w elfa re, thing must he home in mind. The Federal Farm Board is a ss is tin g farmers to set up th e ir own cooperative organizations. them. But one I t is n ’ t doing the job fo r These central associations are owned and con trolled by the cooperatives that form them. They are the marketing agencies of the farmers, not in any sense governmental. When thoroughly organized and firm ly established, they w i l l o ffe r agencies fo r the u n ified marketing o f the d iffe r e n t products o f the farm, on an orderly basis. At the same time, because o f th e ir relation sh ip to th eir members, the cooperative associations are the one agency which can e ff e c t iv e ly discourage unwise expansion in acreage and over-production. The program is e s s e n tia lly a long-tim e program. be achieved in a day. The goal cannot The work o f organizing six and a h a lf m illio n farmers • so that they can e ff e c t iv e ly control and manage th e ir own business along modern business lin e s is not one that lends i t s e l f to rapid action or im mediate re su lts , but a foundation is being la id , on which to erect a firm and la s tin g structure. Before many years have passed, i t is not unreasonable to hope that the Government w i l l have stepped out o f the p ictu re, that the a gricu ltu ra l industry in the United States w i l l be an organized,w ell managed industry, and that agricu ltu re w i l l atta in the standard American le v e l o f p rosp erity. In New Jersey you are to e le c t a United States Senator and an en tire delegation to the House o f Representatives. I t would be id le , notwithstanding my admiration fo r Dwight Morrow, to attempt to praise him before an audience o f h is fellow-Jerseymen. He w i l l be elected w ell nigh unanimously. But, in weighing the m erits o f the candidates fo r seats in the House, may I suggest to you that you review the le g is la t iv e h is to ry -of the la s t eighteen mo'nthsi and consider how often you had reason to be thankful fo r the steadying in fluence and the sound p o lic ie s pursued by the Republican House of Repre- - sentatives, 12 - To use an ancient formula, the House o f Representatives, under the leadership o f Speaker Longworth, has deserved w ell of the country* Two years from now, i f i t seems wise, we can have an en tire change o f management. In the meanwhile, our task is to m obilize the resources and e ffo r t s o f the Nation in meeting and overcoming the conditions created by th is world depression. The problem o f employment must be solved. The American economic system must and w ill prove equal to the task: of providing fo r a l l our people in the days of adversity as i t does so abundantly in those o f p rosp erity. fortunate in the character o f our leadership. We are Is n ’ t i t the part o f wisdom to give our leader united support and to put the f u l l weight o f the country back of h is constructive program fo r the solution o f our common problem? Or do we want the weak and h a ltin g p o lic y that re su lts from divided authority and p o lit ic a l confusion? at the p o lls on Tuesday* That is the one, the only real issue to be s e ttle d FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 31, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT Statement by Secretary M ellon. The statement o f Congressman Garner on the subject of Tax Refunds in th is morning1s press has been ca lled to my atten tion . "While the fa c ts have re peatedly been set fo rth , i t is important that i t should be c le a r ly understood why refunds are made and by what methods they are determined. The system prescribed by Congress fo r the c o lle c tio n o f Federal revenues is based upon the proposition that the needs o f the Government demand the im mediate payment o f taxes. Any dispute over the amount to be paid cannot be permitted to postpone payment. Any controversy can be considered and f a i r l y determined th e rea fter. Accordingly, under our system o f income taxes, each taxpayer prepares h is own return and pays whatever tax he estimates to be due. Thereafter, the Bureau of In tern a l Revenue audits <his return and examines the various elements involved* I f the return is found to be co rrect, the matter is closed. taxpayer has underestimated h is tax, an addition al tax is assessed. I f the I f he has overestimated h is tax, he is e n title d to the refund o f the amount overpaid. If the taxpayer is d is s a tis fie d with the determination o f the Bureau, he is en t it le d to a f u l l hearing, or, at h is option, he may have recourse to tne Board o f Tax Appeals or to the courts. F u ll precautions have been taken to see that the in te re s ts o f the Govern ment are protected. A system has been set up which provides adequate checks and review in a l l cases. Let me b r i e f l y state the various steps that are taken before any money is paid to a taxpayer by way o f tax refund: F ir s t . There is a f i e l d examination and audit made by C iv il Service em ployees under the supervision and d irection of a Treasury agent, who him self is in the c la s s ifie d C iv il Service. 7 - 2 Second* The fa c ts as reported by. the agent in the f i e l d are submitted to and c a re fu lly reviewed by the Audit Review D ivision of the Bureau of In tern al Revenue in Washington, with the assistance of the Valuation D ivision o f the Bureau, composed of technical experts, a l l o f whom are in the c la s s ifie d C iv il Service. Third. I f the refund involved is le s s than $10,000, they report th e ir recommendation to the Commissioner of In tern al Revenue fo r approval or d is approval* Fourth. I f the amount is over $10,000, the proposed refund, together with a l l data, is forwarded to the o ffic e of the General Counsel o f the Bureau of Internal Revenue. There a complete review is made of each and every item, with the assistance, i f necessary, of the technical s t a ff o f the Bureau o± In tern al Revenue. F ifth . A l l refunds in excess of $75,000 are submitted in advance o f pay ment and passed upon by the Congressional Joint Committee on In tern al Revenue Taxation, consisting o f Senator Smoot, of Utah, Senator Watson, o f Indiana, Senator Reed, o f Pennsylvania, Senator Harrison, o f M ississip p i, Congressman Hawley, of Oregon, Congressman Treadway, of Massachusetts, Congressman Bacharach, o f Hew Jersey, Congressman Garner, o f Texas, and Congressman C o llie r , of M ississippi* The suggestion that under any system such as th is refunds fo r p o lit ic a l or any other improper purpose are p ossib le, is simply preposterous. By fa r the la rg est amount o f refunds is due to court decision s, or other causes, over which the Treasury has no con trol. Furthermore, the la rg est re funds in recent years have almost without exception been a ttrib u ta b le to the years o f the War. At that time the Government was under the necessity of c o lle c tin g more than four b i l l i o n d o lla rs annually. complicated and understood by few. The statute was new and There was no time to determine controversies - 3 and in tile emergency taxpayers gen erally paid la rg e amounts into the public treasury, the le g a lit y of which was in dispute. There was always, however, the assurance that u ltim ately these payments would he analyzed, that correct in terp retation s would he applied, that ju s tic e would he done and excessive payments refunded. To say that refunds should he made only hy virtu e of the decision o f a court is to delegate to the courts the en tire administration o f the Income Tax Law, I t is evident that what would apply to refunds would he equally applicable to additional assessments. In e ffe c t a l l questions in volvin g disagreement would have to he referred to the courts. This would resu lt in such interminable delay as to break down the administration o f our income tax system,and would place an in to le ra b le burden upon our already overworked Federal Courts* The suggestion cannot he intended seriou sly. I t is s ig n ific a n t to note that the Bureau has c o llected fa r more in additional taxes than i t has paid out in refunds. Luring the past fourteen years the t o t a l amount o f additional assessments resu ltin g from o ffic e audits and f i e l d in vestiga tion s has been $5,345,202,277, while the amount paid out in refunds during the same period has been $1,254,317,890, Luring that period the to ta l in tern al revenue re ceip ts have been $44,032,371,357, so that the amount refunded by the Bureau has been only approximately 2.8^ o f the amount c o llected v» treasury department FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1930. In connection with the Public Buildings Program Secretary Mellon made the fo llo w in g statement: The Secretary of the Treasury has directed that such repair jobs necessary for the maintenance o f Federal "buildings he expedited so that as much work as possible w ithin the lim its o f the appropriations a va ila b le, w i l l be placed on the market within the next three months. This class of work is gen erally a l—. located to the quarters of the fis c a l year but in view o f the present unemploy ment situ ation , th is a llo c a tio n w i l l be disregarded. The Government has t i t l e to approximately 50 building s ite s fo r which no appropriations have yet been obtained fo r the construction of buildings thereon. The Department contemplates securing the necessary appropriations fo r these projects in the ea rly part of the next session of Congress. As a means toward expediting construction in these cases, the Department has under consideration the immediate use of another appropriation fo r the making o f topographical sur veys and test p it borings, which are usually paid fo r out o f the bu ilding ap propriations. With such data at hand, work on the plans and sp ecifica tio n s fo r the buildings can be advanced to a point where the p rojects can be placed on the market fp r construction bids sh ortly a ft e r appropriations have been secured from Congress. In lin e with the Department’ s desire to have lo c a l labor employed on Federal building p ro jec ts to the greatest extent p ossib le, consideration is now being given to the inclusion o f a paragraph in the sp ecifica tio n s fo r public bu ilding construction which would n o tify bidders that the Department w i l l look with d is favor upon any departure by the contractor from the well-known p o lic y of the Government to maintain ex is tin g rates o f wages. TREASURY REPARTidMT tern I mmediate release , SATURDAY,, NOVEMBER 1, 1930 Secretary Mellon announced today the appointment o f Mr, B, H, Bartholow as Special Assistant to the Secretary o f the Treasury in matters o f le g is la tio n to f i l l -the vacancy occasioned "by the resignation of Mr. Ellsworth C. Alvord, P r io r to h is appointment, Mr. Bartholow was General Assistant to the General Counsel o f the Bureau o f In tern al Revenue, haying been on the le g a l s t a ff of the Bureau fo r over seven years, TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1930. SPEECH DELIVERED BY HON. OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, AT COOPER UNION, NEW YORK CITY, SATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 1, 1930. Note: For f u l l text of speech see Subject F ile : S ecretary^ Speeches. FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1930. RADIO TALK DELIVERED IN BEHALF OF REPRESENTATIVE RUTH PRATT BY HON. OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, OVER STATION WMCA SATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 1st I t is to me a very pleasant p r iv ile g e in these closin g days o f the Cam paign to have the opportunity to say a few words to the voters o f the Seventeenth D is tr ic t, many o f whom I had the honor to represent fo r many years in the State Senate and in Congress. I trust that I s t i l l deserve and enjoy th e ir confidence and that they w i l l give some consideration to these n ecessarily b r ie f and income p lete observations. The Country is to e le c t on Tuesday a new House o f Representatives. In our D is t r ic t , our present Representative, Ruth P r a tt, is a candidate fo r re -e le c tio n . She is e n title d to your support not only on grounds o f broad public p o lic y but because o f high personal m erit, a distinguished public career, and fa it h fu l repre sentation o f your in terests and views. At the present time the business depression, which brings so much su fferin g and d istress to many, overshadows a l l o f those issues that would normally hold our in te re s t. The Democratic Par;ty, n atu rally enough, seeks to make ca p ita l out o f the dépréssion by attempting to hold responsible the Party in power. It has been done b efore, and doubtless w i l l be again; and i f the depression were lim ited to one country, or could be traced to any p o lic y of government, the argu ment might be le g itim a te enough. But, in view o f the fa c t that the economic de pression is world-wide, that many countries are su fferin g i n f i n i t e l y more serious ly than we, and that admittedly the forces which brought i t about are beyond the control of government, I do not b e lie v e that you fin d th is argument p a rtic u la rly persuasive or relevan t. - 2 - u The all-im portant question is , How best to solve the problem of employment, to m itigate the se v e rity of the depression, to avoid hardship and d istress, and 4 to take such steps as w i l l bring us quickest to the point where we can resume once more our normal economic progress* Are our votes next Tuesday lik e ly in any way to a ffe c t or influence th is situation? I b e lie v e they w i l l . You cannot, under any circumstances, e ffe c t a complete change o f government-. We are simply to e le c t a new board o f d irecto rs. President Hoover, as Chief Executive, w ill in any event remain in command of our ship fo r the next two and a half years# At that time, i f i t seems desira b le, there can be a complete change of management and we can a l l bo swept from o f f i c e . But, in the meanwhile, leav*- ing aside h is extraordinary equipment fo r dealing with just such situ ation s, and the leadership and i n i t i a t i v e which he has displayed, and the constructive e ffo r t s he is now engaged in to solve our immediate problems, is i t wise at th is time to seek the cure of divided, authority? resources of the Nation, We need u nity in m ob ilizin g the e ffo r t s and. Do we want, then, to begin by disorganizing the govern ment through the ele c tio n of a Democratic Congress to oppose a Republican P r e s i dent? In th is connection, i t is not amiss to remind you— and i f you think back, you w ill w e ll remember—how often during the course o f the la s t year you had reason to be thankful fo r the steadying influence and sound p o lic ie s o f the Republican House of Representatives as contrasted with those o f the Democratic-Insurgent combina tion. Even Democratic papers have repeatedly stated that the House o f Repre sentatives, of which Ruth P ra tt was an in flu e n tia l Member, under the leadership of Speaker Longworth, had deserved w ell of the Country. Moreover, while I have no desire to be unnecessarily partisan , p a rtic u la rly as I b e lie v e Ruth Pratt is e n title d to support, irre s p e c tiv e of party, as an id ea l type o f public servant, i t is c e rta in ly pertinent to c a ll your atten tion to the fa ct that there is nothing in the Democratic record o f the la s t session to in spire the Country with confidence should they, as the resu lt of your votes, fin d them-* - 3' selves in control o f the next Congress. Presumably, measures which they fought for so vigorou sly must in evita b ly be placed at the head of th e ir le g is la t iv e program once they fin d themselves in a p osition to make such a program e ffe c t iv e . What are they? They voted s o lid ly against the fle x ib le provision in the T a r if f Law, which, whether you lik e the present T a r iff Law or not, constitu tes a d e fin ite and constructive step looking to n o n -p o litic a l, s c ie n t ific readjustment o f rate schedules. With almost equal unanimity in Senate and House, they supported the so-called Export Debenture Plan fo r farm r e l i e f , which contemplated the subsidiz ing o f exports by a wholesale raid on the Treasury and an attempt to dump them in world markets. Had i t not been fo r the Republican m ajority in the House of Rep resentatives, there is n ! t the s lig h te s t doubt that they would have succeeded in passing th is unsound measure, which not only would have fa ile d to g iv e r e l i e f to American a gricu ltu re, but have proved to be a c o s tly and dangerous experiment. I t took the.combined authority o f the President and the Republicans in the House to defeat th eir Rankin Veterans’ Pension B i l l , which might w ell have cost between $400,000,000 and $500,000,000 yearly, in addition to the almost $900,000,000 now being spent fo r the b en efit o f veterans o f former Wars, and at that have afforded the veterans an unsound and inequitable program o f r e l i e f . Through the espousal by the Democrats in the Senate of the H orris Muscle Shoals B ill, they voted to put the Federal Government in the power business. I have no h esita tio n in saying that such a program constitu tes a real menace to business recovery. I t won’ t do to say that i t s enactment is unthinkable. I know that the Democrats came w ithin measureahle distance of carrying i t through. Give them enough additional votes in Senate and House, and they can and may w ell enact these measures into law, a l l the more so since th eir success in th is Elec tion w ill almost n ecessarily carry with i t the implied approval by the elec to ra te of th e ir actions and votes. F in a lly , may I say a word or two about your Representative? You a l l know her magnificent record in the Board o f Aldermen, where single-handed, in the face, - 4 f i r s t , of cyn ica l, and fin a lly re sp ectfu l, "but always overwhelming, opposition, she with amazing knowledge o f our complex c it y government, fo r two years fought the b a ttle of good government, I think i t is f a i r to say that her services earned the respect and admiration o f the en tire c it y , Washington is fu rth er o f f , and you may not have been able to fo llo w her a c t iv it ie s so c lo s e ly . But, from personal observation, I can say that there as here she has continued to show a marked capacity fo r public service. During her f i r s t term she has already made fo r h e rs e lf a p o sition of real influence in a body which is in d iffe r e n t to any thing but real m erit, and which very quickly appraises the capacity o f a now le g is la to r . She is a member o f one o f the leading committees o f the House, the Banking and Currency Committee, one o f unusual import once to a world fin a n cia l center lik e Hew York. I f you w i l l but keep her in the House o f Representatives, she has before her an ever—expanding career o f usefulness to our c it y and country. The situ ation in our D is tr ic t is complicated th is year by the candidacy o f a b r illia n t and en tertainin g gentleman running as a S o c ia lis t, Why he should have selected the Seventeenth D is tr ic t in which to run on the S o c ia lis t tic k e t, is hard to understand, unless, o f course, the candidacy is designed prim arily to help the Tammany candidate. In any event, since, under no circumstances, is i t con ceivable that the Seventeenth D is tr ic t should send a S o c ia lis t to Congress, i t is w ell fo r those attracted by Mr, Broun* s cheerful a m ia b ility to remember tnat a vote fo r him is in e ffe c t a vote fo r Judge Brodsky. Elect him, and you w i l l simply add ju st one more Member to the co lo rless Tammany delegation . Elect Ruth P ra tt, and you w i l l send to Washington at le a s t one Representative capable of representing ably and adequately the in te re s ts o f th is great c it y in the Congress of the United States. POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT The Secretary o f the Treasury made the fo llo w in g announcement: Final steps were taken today in connection with the funding of the indebtedness o f the German Reich to the United States on account of the awards of the Mixed Claims Commission and the costs of the American Army o f Occupation pursuant to the terms o f the agreement executed June 23, 1930. Mr. Rudolph L e itn e r, F ir s t Secretary o f the German Embassy at Washington, d elivered to the Treasury bonds o f the Government o f the German Reich in the p rin cip al amount o f Rm.3,169,700,000, o f which Rm. 2,121,600,000 was on account o f the awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission and Rm.l ,048,100 ,‘000 was on account o f the costs of the American Army o f Occupation. Of the bonds so d eliv ered to the Treasury, numbers one and two o f the Mixed Claims Series in the aggregate p rin cip al amount of Rm.61,200,000, and numbers one and two o f the Army Costs Series in the aggregate p rin cip a l amount o f Rm,37,850,000, having been paid were returned to the German Government. , The act approving the settlement was signed by the President on June 5, 1930. The settlement has lik ew ise been approved by the German Government. FOR RELEASE, MORNING- PAPERS, Monday, Novender 10, 1930. TREASURY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MELLON The Secretary o f the Treasury gives notice that tenders are in vited fo r Treasury h i lls to the amount c f $125,000,000, or there abouts. They w i l l he 31-day h i l l s ; basis to the highest bidders. and w i l l he sold on a discount Tenders w i l l he received at the Federal Reserve Banks, or the branches thereof, up to two o’ clock P.M., Eastern Standard time, on November 13, 193C. Tenders w i l l not he received at the Treasury Department, Washington. The Treasury h i l l s w i l l he dated November 17, 1930, and w ill mature on February 16, 1931, and on the maturity date the face amount;' w ill he payable without in te re s t. They w i l l he issued in hearer farm only, and in amounts or denominations o f $1,000, $13,000, and $100,000 (maturity va lu e). I t is urged that tenders he made on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which w i l l he supplied by the Federal Reserve Banks or branches upon application th erefor. Mo tender fo r an amount less than $1,000 w i l l he considered. Each tender must he in m ultiples o f $1,000. The p rice o ffe re d must he expressed on the basis o f 10G, with not more than three decimal places, e . g . , 99.125. Fractions must not he used. Tenders w i l l he accepted without cash deposit from inctrporated barucs and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment sec u rities. Tenders from others must he accompanied by a deposit o f 10 per cent a f the face amount o f Treasury D ills applied fo r,, unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guaranty o f pay ment by an incorporated bank or trust company.. Immediately a ft e r the closin g hour fo r receipt o f tenders on November'13, 1930, a ll. tenders received at the Federal Reserve Banks or branches thereof up t o the closin g hour w i l l be opened and public announcement o f the acceptable prices w ill fo llo w as soon as possible th e rea fter, probably on the fo llow in g morning.. The Secretary o f the Treasury expressly reserves the rig h t to r e je c t any or a l l tenders or parts o f tenders, and to a l l o t less than the amount applied fo r , and his action in any such respect sh all be fin a l, Tfiose submitting tenders w i l l be advised o f the acceptance ar re je c tio n th ereo f. Pay ment at the price o ffered f o r Treasury b i l l s a llo t t e d must be made at the Federal Reserve Banks in cash or other immediately a v a ila b le funds on November 17, 1930. The Treasury b i l l s w i l l be exempt, as to p rin cip a l and in te rest, and any gain from the sale or other d isp ositio n thereof w i l l also be exempt, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. No less from the sale or other d isp o sitio n o f the Treasury b i l l s sh a ll be allowed as a deduction, or otherwise recognized, fo r the purposes o f any tax now or h erea fter imposed by the United States or any o f i t s possessions. Treasury Department Circular No, 418, as amended, dated June 35, 1930, and this n otice as issued by the Secretary o f the Treasury, prescribe the terms o f the Treasury b i l l s and govern the conditions of th e ir issue. Copies o f the c irc u la r may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank, cr branch thereof. TREASURY DEPARTMENT EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Thursday, November 13, 1930 Secretary Mellon has selected Bebb & Gould and John Graham, a rch itects of S ea ttle, Washington, to be associated in furnishing arch itectu ra l services in the preparation o f drawings and s p e cifica tio n s fo r the proposed Marine H ospital, S eattle. I UI UK t II L L l n FOR RELEASE WHEN DELIVERED TREASURY DEPARTMENT SPEECH TO BE DELIVERED BY HON.':’ 'OGDEN L7 HULLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, TO BE HELD AT THE HOTEL ASTOR, NEW YORK CITY, ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14th, at 2:30 P. M. AMERICA'S SEPARATE AGREEMENT WITH GERMANY, On June 23, 1930, the United States and Germany executed an agreement providing fo r the settlement o f the claims o f the United States and it s c itiz e n s against the German Government. The agreement may he B r ie fly summarized as fo llow s: I t provides that Germany is to pay 40,800,000 Reichsmarks fo r the period September 1, 1929, to March 31, 1930, and the sum of 40,800,000 Reichsmarks per annum from A p ril 1, 1930, to March 31, 1981,in sa tisfa ction o f mixed claims, and beginning September 1, 1929, an average annuity o f 25,300,000 Reichsmarks fo r 37 years in f u l l liq u id a tio n o f our Army Costs* The combined annuities equal the annuity a llo c a ted to the United States under the terms o f the Young Plan. Germany at i t s option, upon not less than 90 days’ advance n otice, may postpone any payment on account o f the prin cip al f a l l i n g due to any subsequent September 30th and March 31st not more than 2-| years distant from i t s due date, a provision that accords, gen era lly speaking, with provisions re la tin g to postponement to be found in our other t ù |. - 2y debt settlem ents. A ll postponed, payments, on account of mixed claims are to tear in te rest at 5 per cent, the rate provided fo r in the Settlement o f War Claims Act of 1928, and a l l payments postponed on account o f Army Costs are to bear in te rest at the rate o f 3 5/8 per cent,. While the annuities are stated in terms o f Reichsmarks, payments are to be made in d o lla rs, eith er at the Treasury or at the Federal Reserve Bank o f $few York. I f we would understand the reason^ which le d up to the making o f a separate agreement with Germany, i t is necessary to consider the situ ation of the United States as compared with that o f the other cre d ito r powers* At the time the Young Plan came in to existence, the claims o f the United States against Germany f e l l into two lim ite d classes: F ir s t , those covering the re imbursement o f our Government fo r the costs o f our Army of Occupation; and, se condly, those r e la tin g to the compensation o f our c itiz e n s fo r damages sustained from acts of war, as adjudicated by a jo in t tribunal set up by agreement with Germany and popularly known as "mixed claim s." On the other hand, our Govern ment had recognized two classes o f claims by German c itiz e n s against i t , the fir s t comprising the return in cash or in kind o f property o f p riva te persons seized by the A lien Property Custodian; and the second covering compensation for ships, radios and patents seized by the United States Government fo r i t s own use. The h isto ry o f the Army Costs and Mixed Claims items i s as fo llo w s : Army Costs. The to ta l costs o f the United States Army o f Occupation amounted to $292,663,435*79. Except fo r cash req u isitio n s on the German Government fo r the use o f the Army of Occupation aggregating $37,509,605.97 and certain other items, such as provost fin e s , abandoned enemy war m aterial, e t c ., amounting to $7,288,184.33, the United States Government received no payments on account o f Army Costs up to May 25, 1923. On that date the United States and the p rin cip a l A llie d Powers signed the so-ca lled Wadsworth Agree:.***, ment, which provided that our Army Costs should he divided in to twelve annual instalments, and should he, during the f i r s t four o f the twelve years, a f i r s t , charge on cash payments received from Germany a ft e r the expenses of the Repara tion Commission and the current expenses of the A llie d Armies of Occupation, hut during the la s t eight years should he an absolute p rio r charge on a l l cash pay ments, except fo r the costs o f the Reparation Commission. R a tific a tio n s o f the Wadsworth Agreement were never exchanged hut we received a payment under i t of $14,725,154.40 in January, 1925. The Agreement was superseded hy the so -ca lled Paris Agreement o f January 14, 1925, which also covered awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission. This la t t e r Agreement was concluded at a meeting of repre sentatives of the cred itor powers, including the United States, ca lled fo r the purpose of making d istrib u tio n of the annuities provided fo r under the terms of the Dawes Plan, which had been adopted in 1924. Under the provision s of the Paris Agreement, the United States was to receive on account o f i t s Army Costs, beginning September 1, 1926, the sum o f 55,000,000 gold marks, or about $13,100,000 per annum, which payments were to constitu te a f i r s t charge on cash made a va ila b le fo r tran sfer by the Transfer Committee out o f the Dawes annuities a fte r the provision o f the sums necessary fo r the service o f the 800,000,000 gold mark German external loan of 1924 and fo r the costs o f the Reparation and other Commissions. Under the provisions of the Wadsworth Agreement, our Army Costs should have been liqu idated by the end o f 1935. Under the Paris Agreement, the payments would extend over a period of about 18 years, beginning September 1, 1926. Up to the f i r s t of September, 1929, the United States had received on Army Costs Account, $39,203,725.89 under the P a ris Agreement. As o f September 1, 1929, there was s t i l l due on account o f Army Costs $193,936,765.20. ' > 4 Mixed Claims» By virtu e of an agreement entered in to on August 10j 1922, by the United States and Germany, there y^as set up a Mixed Claims Commission, charged with the duty o f passing upon the-'claims o f American c itiz e n s a risin g since July 31, 1914, in respect of damage to or seizure o f th eir property, rig h ts end in te rests, and upon any other claims fo r lo ss or damage to which the United States or i t s nationals had been subject with respect to in ju rie s to persons or to property, rig h ts and in te rests since July 31, 1914, as a consequence of the War, and including debts owing to American c itiz e n s by the German Government or by German nationals. The f i r s t meeting o f the Commission was held on October 9, 1922# Up to August 31, 1929, awards had been c e r t ifie d to the Treasury fo r payment which, with in te re s t to August 31, 1929, aggregated $172,703,083.71. I t was estimated as of August 31, 1929, that the p rin cip a l amount o f awards yet to be entered and c e r t ifie d , together with in te rest to that date, amounted to $53,000,000, and in addition awards to the United States Government, with in terest to August 31, 1929, amounted to $64,934,794.41. -In other words, as of August 31, 1929, i t was estimated that the to ta l awards o f the Mixed Claims Commission, made and to be made, aggregated with in te rest $290,637,878.12* No provision fo r the payment o f the awards of the Mixed Claims Commission was made u n til the P a ris Agreement o f January 14, 1925. The P a ris Agreement provided that the United States should receive 2%j> o f a l l receip ts from Germany on account o f the Dawes annuities a va ila b le fo r d istrib u tio n as reparations, provided that the annuity resu ltin g from th is percentage should n°t in any year exceed the sum of 45,000,000 gold marks. Up to September 1, 1929, the United States had received from Germany under the P a ris Agreement for account of mixed claims $31,831,472.03, which, with earnings and p r o fit s on investments amounting to $2,149,692,70, made a va ila b le fo r d istrib u tio n - 5 - $33,981,164.73, and l e f t $256,656,713.39 s t i l l to "be provided fo r . I t imist be -understood in th is connection that the fig u re s re la tin g to the to ta l amount fin a lly awarded by the Mixed Claims Commission were n ecessarily only an e s t i mate, since a l l o f the awards had not as yet been made. Turning, now, to (Jermany1s claims against the United States, our Government, in common with other nations engaged in the Great War, had segues-* tered or seized fo r i t s own use the property o f German c itiz e n s . Once the War was over, i t could have elected , as others did, to retain that property and ap ply i t to the sa tis fa c tio n o f i t s own claims and those o f i t s c itiz e n s , lea v ing the German owners to seek compensation from th e ir own Government. Had the United States follow ed th is course in the f i r s t instance, i t seems probable that at the time of the adoption o f the Young Plan we would have been completely out o f the p ictu re, and there would have been no occasion fo r eith er a jo in t or a separate agreement. However, in accordance with a time-honored tra d itio n and what we conceived to be sound public p o lic y , we elected eith er to return the property or to compensate the owners, the payments to extend over a number of years, the to ta l period fo r fin a l liq u id a tio n corresponding in a general way to that re quired to discharge the o b ligation s o f our own c itiz e n s . This is a noteworthy fa c t, fo r i t resu lts in the tra n sfer of important sums to Germany during the period o f payment to us. And what is even more s ig n ific a n t, in the e a r lie r , years d o lla r payments to Germany w i l l exceed mark payments to the United States. During the f i r s t three years of the l i f e o f the separate agreement, we w i l l re ceive some 198,000,000 Reichsmarks, or about $47,000,000; whereas we w i l l place at the disposal o f German c itiz e n s — I can g iv e you but approximate fig u res— about $148,000,000 in cash or property. This, as I understand i t , is not true - 6 !1a ) - of other cred ito r countries. Moreover, i t must he remembered that, in accordance with the p o lic y established by President Wilson, who as ea rly as 1919 had said that in his opinion we should claim nothing under the general reparation clauses, we had never presented a claim fo r general reparations; we had not p a rticip ated in the fix in g o f the sums to be paid by Germany or in the apportioning o f those sums among the cred itor powers» we had never joined others in the c o lle c tio n of payments, and we had never been represented on the Reparation Commission, which, a fte r a l l , came into existence to deal with an almost s t r i c t l y European problem. I t appears, then, that at the time the question arose as to whether we should become p a rties to the Young Plan, or r e ly on a separate agreement with Germany, the p o sitio n o f the United States d iffe r e d in several important particu la rs from that o f the other p rin cip a l creditors? P ir s t , our claims were o f a lim ited character and, compared with the to ta l reparation b i l l , were compara t iv e ly small. payments. We w i l l re ceive le s s than three per cent of the to ta l Young Secondly, by reason o f our p o lic y o f non-confiscation and compensa tion o f German c itiz e n s , mark payments to the United States w i l l be o ffs e t to some extent throughout the period of payment, and in the e a r lie r years more than o ffs e t by d o lla r payments to Germany, which obviously f a c i l i t a t e s b i- la t e r a l transfers? and, th ird ly , we had never joined our war associates in the assessment? c o lle c tio n and d istrib u tio n o f general reparation payments. The adoption of the Young Plan, by our becoming a party to the Hague Conventions, would have involved o f f i c i a l approval on our p a rt, not only o f the to ta l reparation b i l l presented to Germany, a question in which we had no primary in te re s t, but o f the fa irn ess o f the d istrib u tio n o f the amounts to be paid as between European cred ito rs, as to which we had no knowledge and no in te rest whatsoever. In addition, we would have had to assume in the future a share o f the re s p o n s ib ility c f c o lle c tin g and d istrib u tin g payments, fo r we - 7 - could not have accepted the b e n e fits afforded by the Young Plan machinery and have declined to bear any part o f the burdens. C learly, our in te rests were not s u ffic ie n t ly important to ju s t ify our plunging headlong into th is troublesome European problem, and reversing the p o lic y la id down by President Wilson, and follow ed since h is day, p a rtic u la rly since, had we p articip ated , i t i s probable, should any d i f f i c u l t i e s a rise in the future, that we, as a comparatively d isin terested party, would fin d our selves in the p o sition o f a rb ite r , ca lled upon to s e ttle and decide a contro v e rs ia l and d i f f i c u l t European question. But there is another co n tro llin g reason which made i t inadvisable and inconsistent fo r us to accept and become a party to the Young Plan. The Plan apparently seeks to lin k and merge reparation payments by Germany with a llie d debt payments to the United States. Here again President Wilson, on the very f i r s t occasion that th is attempt was made, took the p o sition that the settlement and payment o f the obliga tion s to us, incurred by our associates, were e n tir e ly independent and unrelated to the reparation claims made against Germany. He said the United States Government ” f a i l s to p erceive the lo g ic in a suggestion in e ffe c t eith er that the United States shall pay part o f Germany’ s reparation ob ligation or that i t shall make a gra tu ity to the a llie d governments to induce them to f i x such ob ligation at an amount w ithin Germany’ s capacity to pay. This Government has endeavored h eretofore in a most fr ie n d ly s p ir it to make i t clear that i t cannot consent to connect the reparation question with that of in te r governmental indebtedness . 11 That p o lic y has been con sisten tly adhered to by our Government. In short, when the question arose as to whether we should make a separate agreement with Germany fo r the s a tis fa c tio n o f our r e la t iv e ly modest claims, or decide to pool them with the in f i n i t e l y larger claims o f the Eurppean creditors, a l l o f the arguments appeared to be in favor o f the f i r s t course.. -- . f i ~ 8 r. I t was simple, d ir e c t, e n tire ly adequate to protect American in te re s ts , and in accordance with established p o lic y ; whereas the a lte rn a tiv e involved not only, abandonment o f the attitu d e stea d fa stly maintained toward both war debts and reparation problems, but the assumption o f r e s p o n s ib ilitie s on our part wholly disproportionate to the magnitude o f our claims and re la tin g to problems almost s t r ic t ly European in character. While, th erefo re, we were quite ready to accept the annuities a lloca ted to us by the Young Plan, which involved some s a c r ific e on our part, i t seems to me that we would not have been ju s t ifie d in becoming particip an ts, and that we follow ed a wise and proper course in providing fo r the sa tis fa c tio n of our Claims against Germany in a separate agreement. I TREASURY DEPARTMENT . ' EOR RELEASE,. MORNING PAPERS, FRIDAY, November 14, 1930. STATEMENT BY SECRETARY OP THE- TREASURY MELLON Secretary of the Treasury Mellon announced today that the tenders fo r $125,000,000, or thereabouts, of 91-day Treasury B ills dated November 17, 1930, and maturing February 16,. 1931, which were o ffe re d on November 10, 1930 were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on November 13, 1930. The to ta l amount applied fo r was $568,280,000. The highest bid made was 99.605 equivalent to an in te re s t rate of about an 1.56 per cent on/annual basis. The lowest bid accepted was 99.558 equivalent to an in te rest ra te o f about 1.75 per cent on an annual basis. The to ta l amount o f bids accepted was $127,455,000. The average p rice o f Treasury B i l l s to be issued is 99.564. The average rate on bank discount basis is about 1.72 per cent. TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1930 Secretary Mellon announces the selectio n of the fo llo w in g a rch itects: P a is t & Steward fo r the fed era l bu ildin g at Miami, F lorid a. H. J. Klutho, parcel post bu ildin g at Jackson ville, F lorid a. FOR RELEASE WHEN DELIVERED TREASURY DEPARTMENT SPEECH TO BE DELIVERED BY HON. OGDEN L. MILLS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, BEFORE THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AUDITORS, COMPTROLLERS AND TREASURERS, AT THE PENNSYLVANIA HOTEL, NEW YORK CITY, ON THURSDAY MORNING, NOVEMBER 20th. THE EXECUTIVE BUDGET SYSTEM. We have, among other problems, a tax problem in the United States, which is , of course, d ir e c tly rela ted to the high cost of government. We very r ig h tly take pride in our increased in d u stria l e ffic ie n c y , our low cost of production, our constant s triv in g in the business and commercial f i e l d to elim inate waste; and yet we are curiously apathetic toward the problem of e ffic ie n c y in the f i e l d o f government, and apparently unmindful that here, too, waste is d is tin c tly uneconomic. The cost o f the Federal, State and lo c a l governments constitutes in a sense a part of our national overhead expense, and i f too heavy must be a drag on our economic progress. When governmental expenditures absorb almost 14 per cent o f our national income, is i t too much to say that we have a very re a l in terest in seeing to i t that a proper system of control Is set up? Based on nine years* experience, I think I am safe in a ffirm in g that, in so fa r as the Federal Government is concerned, suer, control e x is ts through the establishment of a sound budget system. While I am fa r from claiming that the resu lts are due more than in part to e ffe c t iv e ¿budgetary p ractices, the fo llo w in g fig u re s are sig n ific a n t in emphasing'where* the tax problem of the fu tu re lie s : - 2 - While Federal taxes, were reduced from $4,905,000,000, in 1921, to $3,364,000,000, in 1928, or a decrease of $1,541,000,000, State and lo c a l increased from $3,933,000,000 to $6,095,000,000, or $2,162,000,000. The in crease in State and lo ca l taxes not only o ffs e t the reduction in Federal tax es, hut resu lted in an increase of $621,000,000 in a l l taxes* Federal taxes amounted per capita to $28.03, in 1928, as compared with $45.23, in 1921; while State and lo c a l taxes were $50.79 per capita in 1928 and $36,27 in 1921. Turning, now, to public expenditures, the fa c ts are even more s ig n ific a n t, Tax receip ts are frequ ently confused with governmental costs. As a matter of fa c t, they do not by any means correspond. Year in and year out our governments, with the exception of the Federal Government, spend much more than th eir current revenues, the d iffe re n c e as a rule being made good from the proceeds o f borrowing. Total expenditures by Federal, State aid lo c a l govern ments amounted to $12,179,000,000, in 1927, the la te s t complete fig u re a v a il able, representing an increase o f $1,257,000,000, or 18.3 per cent, as compared with 1924, in the disbursements of a l l State and lo c a l governments, and a net increase of $1,205,000,000 fo r a l l governments. financed over and above tax revenues? in public debt outstanding. How were these expenditures The answer is to be found in the changes The Federal Government is paying o ff i t s indebted ness, while the States and m u n icipalities are resortin g to bond issues to finance additional expenditures, apparently n e g le c tfu l o f the fa c t that in the long run borrowing is the most expensive method o f public financing. Haring the seven c rie r years, 1922-1928, the net funded or financed indebtedness o f o&toy and lo c a l governments increased from $7,264,000,000 to $12,579,000,000, an increase of more than $5,300,000,000. Meanwhile, the national debt, which by 1922 had a l ready been considerably reduced from the war peak, was fu rth er reduced by nearly «i 3 $5,400,000,000 "by the end of the fis c a l year 1923. High taxes and the high cost o f government do not n ecessarily iA p fe uneconomic expenditures hy the community as a whole, in spite o f the very natural resentment which the in dividu al may f e e l at the increased encroachment ty government on h is personal resources. Under complex modern conditions, governments must undertake re s p o n s ib ilitie s which in simpler days coula be safely l e f t to p riva te in d ivid u als. IMrthermore, i t is unquestionably true that the people want, and, th e o r e tic a lly at le a s t, are w illin g to pay fo r , more and b e tte r service from th eir government. The mere fa c t , then, tnat we are expending an increasing amount o f money does not n ecessarily mean that there is extravagance and waste or u n ju s tifie d expenditures. On the other hand when there i s reason to b e lie v e that extravagance and waste e x is t, to plead the worthiness o f the objects, as is so freq u en tly done, is u t te r ly beside the point. So one w i l l deny that we must have highways and an adequate educational system., but whether in these f ie ld s we are g e ttin g a f u l l return on the money spent is the question which must be answered. The re a l problem, as I see i t , i s not so much as to whether we shall decrease or increase our governmental a c t iv it ie s , but whether we could not get what we are g e ttin g to-day from government fo r a good deal less than we are paying; ond, from my experience, that is a very l i v e and real question. In order to answer i t , i t is necessary to ascertain in each p a rticu la r instance whether a system has been set up which w i l l insure a proper co..trol over appropriations and expenditures, and at the same time tend to develop the e ffic ie n c y necessary to y ie ld a d o lla r 's worth o f service fo r every d o lla r appropriated and expended. In the commercial and business f i e l d , competi insures e ffic ie n c y and economy; in the f i e l d o f government, we must look to the ^L If 3 b -In settin g up o f public accounts in such a way that the public can re a d ily grasp not only what the routine administration o f government is costing, but what is involved in the way o f expenditures by new p o lic ie s suggested fo r th e ir approval. Aside from eternal vig ila n ce on the part o f the public, which can only be e ffe c t iv e i f the books are always open and the accounts in re a d ily understandable form, control o f the purse-strings must be exercised in such a manner as to compel the e f f ic i e n t and economical administration o f the government machine. What is known as the Executive Budget System, proper ly organized and applied, meets these fundamental requirements. Stated from the point o f view o f our Federal experience, a budget system fo r government finance in volves not only a systematic plan o f receipts and expenditures, but also the machinery fo r putting th is plan in to operation. In the plan i t s e l f , the budget proper, the needs o f the government are estimated and balanced against anticipated income fo r a d e fin it e period in advance, and are also compared witJi the actual expenditures and actual receip ts in pre ceding periods. Such a plan, presented to the L eg isla tu re and to the pu blic, permits a careful survey o f the needs of the various branches o f the govern ment as a basis fo r le g is la tio n covering receip ts and expenditures. The budget and accounting system fu rther provides fo r a thorough and independent audit o f the expenditures. Most important a f a l l , when properly in stitu ted , the budget system is the most e ffe c t iv e way o f c o n tro llin g current expenditures and providing fo r adm inistrative e ffic ie n c y . I have had first-h a n d opportunity to study the old system o f control through Committees o f the L egisla tu re, and control by means o f an executive budget system. As a State Senator, I was a member o f the Finance Committee, and fo r the la s t four’ years, among other duties, I have - 5 ~ been the Budget O ffic e r o f the Treasury Department. When I was in Albany, the heads o f the d iffe r e n t Departments and Bureaus would appear before us and présent th e ir needs as they saw them, in great d e ta il. We had a va ila b le past experience and figu res o f former years, and we had opportunity fo r crossexamination lim ited only by the time element. We could check inordinate and apparently u n ju s tifie d increases, but we had no machinery fo r ascertaining whether the current needs were determined by mere routine and perhaps a waste fu l system of. administration, or by a high state of- adm inistrative e ffic ie n c y . Moreover, fre e from any current checking up on the conduct o f his o ffic e , and o f n ecessity knowing more o f his Departments a c t iv it ie s than we members o f the Legisla tu re could possibly know, each adm inistrative head was in an admirable p o sitio n to make out the most p lau sib le case in support of h is estimates. We did the best we c ould, and on the whole the system worked f a i r l y w e ll, though I never had the fe e lin g that I had before me a l l o f the information necessary to form a sound business judgment. Contrast such a system with that now fu nctioning in Washington. There we have a Budget D irector who is in complete control o f alL adm inistrative requests fo r appropriations, since no estimates con go- to Congress except through the President, who acts, o f course, upon recommendation of the Budget D irector. The la t t e r is supported by an expert s t a ff, the several members o f which are as signed to the various Departments and independent establishments o f the govern ment. They are expected to become thoroughly fam iliar with a l l phases o f the la t te r * s respective a c t iv it ie s and be prepared to advise the Budget D irector as to what funds are actu ally needed fo r e ffic ie n t operation. In addition, each Bopartm©at and separate establishment has a budget o ffic e r , responsible fo r a ll estimates submitted, and fo r the supervision o f expenditures. the system works in the Treasury Department# Let us see how tj 3° - 6 - In tii© ea rly summer each Bureau in the Department is required tq prepare an estimate o f i t s needs fo r the ensuing year, together with sheets ju s tify in g every item. These estimates are f i r s t examined by the Budget and Improvement Committee o f the Treasury Department, composed o f men o f long ex perience, and each o f whom is thoroughly fa m ilia r with one or more Bureaus. They review the estimates and make th e ir recommendation to the Budget O ffic e r o f the Department. He then holds hearings, la s tin g from three weeks to a month, at which the representatives o f every Bureau appear and are required to ju s t i fy th eir estimates in d e ta il, in the lig h t o f the c ritic is m o f the Budget and Improvement Committee. Remember that the Budget O ffic e r is not an outsider, unfamiliar with the administration o f the Department,, but one o f the c h ie f administrative o ffic e r s , in d a ily contact with a l l o f it s a c t iv it ie s . A fte r the estimates have received h is approval, they are re fe rre d to the Budget Di~ reefcar and subjected to the scrutiny o f his s t a ff. When there has been ample opportunity to analyze them the Budget D irector holds his hearings, and, on the basis o f the information thus made a va ila b ly to him ,is in a p o sition to make his recommendations to the President fo r transmission to the Congress. Such a system not only insures the reduction o f estimates to a point where they repre sent the real needs o f a Department, bit i t has the e ffe c t o f stim ulating every Bureau Chief and adm inistrative o f f ic e r to study the ways and means whereby he ««»increase the e ffic ie n c y o f h is organization and cut the costs; fo r you can rest assured that the Budget O ffic e r , and the Budget and Improvement Committee working under him, aside from the very real sense o f re s p o n s ib ility which comes from the o b lig a tio n placed on them, in the very nature o f things take pride in asking a good showing under a system which tends to bring to lig h t the defects and make clea r improvements and economies effected * There is one fu rth er advantage which should he pointed out* The Budget D irector, once h is hearings are complete, has before him, on the one hand, the complete pictu re o f the Government needs during the coming fis c a l year, and, on the other, has the estimates submitted to him by the Treasury and other Departments o f the probable receip ts* I f the l a t t e r are not adequate to cover a l l o f the proposed expenditures, one or two courses are open— eith er the revenues oust be increased by new taxation, or the le s s necessary o f the proposed expenditures can be elim inated. This is a question o f p o lic y to be determined by the Chief Executive, but he is enabled to reach h is conclusions and make h is recommendations to Congress based, not on guesswork or haphazard estimates, but on d e fin it e ly ascer tained fig u res, founded on a thorough business procedure. A fte r the Congress has made the necessary appropriations, covering the various a c t iv it ie s o f government, we in the Treasury, fo r instance, require each one o f our Bureaus to set up reserves out o f i t s appropriations and to a llo c a te the balance to the four quarters. They cannot, gen erally speaking, exceed the a llo c a tio n in any quarter or draw on the reserve without the permission o f the Budget O ffic e r o f the Department, who in turn reports to the Budget D irector* Thus, you see, that from the day the f i r s t estimates are set up to the day the la s t cent is expended, a control is in fo rce designed to protect the public funds from useless, wasteful or extravagant expenditure. U ntil about twenty years ago the systematic planning o f government expenditures through a budget was p r a c tic a lly unknown to th is country. L egis la tu res, Federal, State and lo c a l, appropriated money in a haphazard fashion and accordingly the executive departments spent ca relessly , in many cases without an adequate audit o f accounts, ¿Is a resu lt o f the pressure o f increasing governmental expenditures, some form o f cen tra lized control was regarded with increasing fa v o r. This was recognized in President T aft Is Commission on Economy and E ffic ie n c y organized in 1910 to in vestig a te the organization,, administration and fin a n c ia l procedure o f the Federal Govern ment, One o f the most important reports o f th is Commission was that on »The Need fo r a National Budget,» transmitted to Congress in 1912 by President T a ft with a message o f approval, Although the work o f th is Commission did not resu lt in the National Budget u n til about nine years la t e r , sim ilar in vestiga tio n s were in itia t e d in a number o f states* Considerable progress has been made by certain state governments and by certa in c it y governments in in s titu tin g budget systems* However, too often in these cases the budget is merely a c o lle c tio n o f the fig u res o f proposed expenditures with no machinery fo r bringing expenditures into balance with receip ts, fo r providing an independent audit o f expenditures, or fo r promoting adm inistrative e ffic ie n c y and economy. Or, again, an Executive Budget System has been looked upon as an instrument designed to augment the power o f the Executive at the expense o f the L e g isla tu re, no such purpose. I t should have As a matter o f fa c t, a properly presented budget, furnish ing as i t should more adequate and r e lia b le data, puts the L e g is la tiv e body in a b e tte r p o sitio n to control executive expenditures. Moreover, while le g is la t iv e bodies are on occasions, to say the le a s t, extravagant, year in and year out in our c it ie s and States the spending agencies are the ones that c a ll fo r constant supervision, check and con trol. Not only do State and lo c a l governments need more businesslike methods in planning th e ir en tire budgets? they also need more systematic and businesslike planning o f the financing o f one special group o f expenditures, namely, those which are now paid fo r from debt issues* In State and lo c a l government finance there is a ltogeth er too common a p ra ctice o f la b e lin g each debt issue as an emergency issue fo r an unusual permanent improvement* The volume o f debt issues and o f the debt charge# have cumulated in recent years at an alarming rate* . V- Since 1922 the public debt o f State and lo c a l governments has increased at an average rate o f almost $900,000,000 per year, o f which about $800,000,000 has been indebtedness o f lo c a l govern ments* The value o f the to t a l bonds issued in 1927 was about 40$ greater than the amount expended fo r in te rest and debt redemption. In other words, States and l o c a l i t i e s have made such fr e e use o f the borrowing power that the b illio n and a h a lf o f bonds which they sold in 1927 l e f t them a very small margin over the amount they were o bliged to pay on account o f deot already incurred* This fa c t alone is s ig n ific a n t enough to serve as a warning that the time has come to examine not only the cost o f government but also the e x is tin g methods o f financing that cost. Comparatively l i t t l e atten tion has been given to the fa c t that expenditures fo r and the financing o f improvements constitu te a special budget problem* I t is ju st as fe a s ib le to plan fo r permanent improvements, talcing into account a period o f years, as i t is to plan current expenditures fo r a budget. Furthermore, i f plans were made in a more businesslike way, the costs o f improvements could be covered w ith the minimum tax burden* I t is obvious that State and lo c a l governments w i l l .continue year a ft e r year to make expenditures fo r improvements. As the scope o f a c t iv it y o f these governments grows, increased permanent improvements are in evita b ly in volved, extension, Furthermore, improvement a once male require replacement and For example, each year improved highways are replaced by “b etter ones and each year additions are made to the number o f improved m iles o f highway. In such a situ ation i t i s obviously unbusinesslike fo r governments to regard the expenditure fo r each new improvement as an extraordinary expense, never to recur. Whether an improvement should be paid fo r from current revenue or from the proceeds o f debt issues, depends upon the character o f the improvement, the length o f i t s l i f e , whether or not the ca p ita l expenditure is a recurring one, the state o f the public finances and c re d it, the tax burden and whether or not e x is tin g tax rates bring in more revenue than is needed fo r current purposes, each instance. A careful and thorough inquiry is required in In so fa r as certa in expenditures fo r improvement occur regu larly from year to year, provision should be made to finance these from current revenues. Furthermore, i t is i n fin it e ly b e tte r to finance non-productive investments from current revenue than to incur a burden fo r future budgets. In th is connection, I suggest a study o f the p o lic y adopted by the State o f Massachusetts, which in recent years has made a tru ly remark able record o f sound financing. I t is obvious that l i t t l e real b en efit is being derived from the present method, even in the way o f r e l i e f from present tax burdens, and that, i f bonds continue to be issued at th e ir present rate, th is method o f public financing w i l l prove in fin it e ly more expensive in the immediate future than had v/e financed ca p ita l expenditures, more p a rtic u la rly those ui r .curring kind, from current revenue. The conclusions which I draw from a l l tu is are that we are con fronted with two very d e fin it e questions,— f i r s t , whether the costs o f our State and lo c a l governments are excessive, judged from the standpoint o f j g - 11 whother we could not got the present service at lower cost through more oCi~ \ e n t ific "budgeting; and, secondly, whether e x is tin g methods o f financing these costs are sound, economically* There is no one answer to tnese questions* They must "be asked separetely in every State, ar.d in p r a c tic a lly every community. Moreover, they are recurrent questions that nave tc be asked and answered every year, and th eir answer, therefor©* presupposes the existence o f permanent budget machinery. We must have, on the one hand, a budget system that w i l l permit in te llig e n t planning and e ffe c t iv e control, and that w ill enable the people to get a correct p ictu re o f the fin a n cia l transactions and status o f th e ir governments; and, on the other hand, a w illin gn ess on the part o f the people to g iv e the in te llig e n t consideration and a ctive in te rest without which in the lorg run no popular government w i l l function adequately- TREASURY DEPARTMENT V K)R RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS Monday,. December 8 ,. 1930, • .. BY SECRETARY MELLON The Treasury is today o ffe r in g fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te re s t, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t i fic a te s o f indebtedness in two series, both dated and bearing in te rest from December 15, 1930, one series, TJ2-1931, being fo r 6 months, with in te re s t at the rate o f i f per cent, and maturing June 15, 1931, and the other series, TD-1931, being fo r 12 months, with in te re s t at the rate o f 1-7/8 per cent, and maturing December 15, 1931. The amount o f the six months* o ffe r in g is $150,000,000, or thereabouts, and the amount o f the twelve months’ o ffe r in g is $250,000,000,' or thereabouts. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks. The Treasury w i l l accept in payment fo r the new c e r t ific a t e s , at par, Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1930, maturing December 15, 1930. Subscriptions fo r the six month i f per cent cer t ific a t e s o f Series TJ2-1931, in payment o f which c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness maturing December 15, 1930, are to be tendered, w i l l be given preferred allotment up to $30,000,000, w hile subscriptions fo r the twelve month 1-7/8 per cent c e r t ific a te s o f Series TD-1931, in payment o f which c e r t ific a te s maturing December 15, 1930, are to be tendered, w i l l be given p referred allotment up to $50,000,000, - 2 - Bearer c e r t ific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a t e s of Series TJ2-1931 w i l l have one in te rest coupon attached, payable June 15, 1931, and the c e r t ific a te s o f Series TD-1931, two in te re s t coupons attached, payable June lo , 1931, and December 15, 1931. Those c e r t ific a te s w i l l be exempt, both as to p rin cip a l and in te rest, from a l l taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. About $480,000,00^ o f Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness and about $90,000,000 in in te re s t payments on the public debt become due and payable on DeceEiber 15, 1930, and about $51,000,000 in Treasury b i l l s become due and payable on December 16 and $51,000,000 on December 17. The text o f the o f f i c i a l c ircu la r follow s; -3- The Secretary o f the Treasury, under the authority o f the Act aporoved September 24, 1917, as amended, o ffe r s fo r subscription, at par and accrued in te rest, through the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness, in two series, both dated and bearing in te rest from December 15, 1930, the C c ftific d te s o f Series TJ2-1931 being payable on June 15* 1931, with in terest at the rate o f one ana three-quarters per cent per anniim^ payable on a semiannual basis* ahd the c e r t ific a te s o f Series TD**1931 being payable on December 15, 1931* with in terest at the rate o f one and seven-eighthS per cent per annum* payable semiannually. Applications w i l l be received at the Federal Reserve Banks* Bearer c e r tific a te s w i l l be issued in denominations o f $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and $100,000. The c e r t ific a t e s o f Series TJ2-1931 w i l l have one in te re s t coupon attached, payable June 15, 1931, and the c e r t ific a t e s o f Series TD-1931, two in te rest coupons attached, payable June 15, 1931, and December 15, 1931. The c e r t ific a te s o f said series sh a ll be exempt, both as to p rin cip al and in te rest, from a l l taxation (except estate and inheritance taxes) now or h erea fter imposed by the United States, any State, or any o f the possessions o f the United States, er by any lo c a l taxing authority. The c e r t ific a t e s o f these series w i l l be accepted at par during such time and under such rules and regulations as slnall be pre scribed or approved by the Secretary o f the Treasury, in payment o f income and p r o fit s taxes payable at the maturity o f the c e r t ific a t e s . -4- The c e r t ific a te s o f these series w ill he acceptable to secure deposits o f public moneys, but w i l l not bear the circu la tio n p r iv ile g e . The rig h t is reserved to re je c t any subscription and to a llo t less than the amount o f c e r t ific a te s o f eith er or both series applied fo r and to close the subscriptions as to eith er or both series at any time without notice* The Secretary o f the Treasury also re serves the rig h t to make allotm ent in f u l l upon apiplications fo r smaller amounts, to make reduced allotm ents upon, or to r e je c t, applications fo r la rg e r amounts, and to make c la s s ifie d allotm ents and allotments upon a graduated scale; and his action in these respects w i l l be fin a l. Allotment notices w i l l be sent out promptly upon allotm ent, and the basis o f the allotment w i l l be p u b licly announced. Payment at par and accrued in terdst fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d must be made on or before December 15, 1930, or on la t e r allotm ent. A fte r allotment and upon payment Federal Reserve Banks may issue interim receipts pending d eliv ery o f thé d e fin it iv e c e r t ific a t e s . Any q u a lifie d depositary w i l l be permitted to make payment by cred it fo r c e r t ific a t e s a llo tte d to i t fo r i t s e l f and i t s customers up to any amount fo r which i t shall be q u a lifie d in excess o f ex is tin g deposits, when so n o tifie d by the Federal Reserve Bank o f it s d is t r ic t . indebtedness o f Series TD-1930, maturing Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f December 15, 1930, w i l l be accepted at par, in payment fo r any c e r t ific a t e s o f the series now o f fered which sh all be subscribed fo r and a llo tte d , with an adjustment o f the in te rest accrued, i f any, on the c e r t ific a te s o f the series so paid fo r. -5- As f i s c a l agents o f the United States, Federal Reserve Banks are authorized and requested to receive subscriptions and to make allotments on the basis and up to the amounts indicated by the Secretary o f the Treasury to the Federal Reserve Barks o f tne respec tiv e d is t r ic ts . *X . 7 TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR RELEASE, MORNING PAPERS, Thursday, December 1 1 , 1930, Secretary Mellon announced that subscriptions fo r the two issues of Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness, Series TJ2-1931, 1-3/4 per cent, dated December 15, 1930, maturing June 15, 1931, and Series TD-1931, 1-7/8 per cent, dated December 15, 1930, maturing December 15, 1931, closed at the close of business on December 9, 1930, Reports received from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks show that fo r the o ffe r in g of 1-3/4 per cent c e r t ific a t e s of Series TJ2-1931, which was fo r $150,000,000 or thereabouts, to ta l subscriptions aggregate some $939,000,000, and that fo r the o ffe r in g o f 1-7/8 per cent c e r t ific a te s o f Series TD-1931, which was fo r $250,000,000 or thereabouts, to ta l sub scription s aggregate some $517,000,000, Of these subscriptions, about $144,000,000 represent subscriptions fo r which 3-l/4 per cent Treasury c e r t ific a te s of indebtedness of Series TD-1930, maturing December 15, 1930, were tendered in payment, of which about $80,000,000 were accepted. Allotments on the cash subscriptions fo r 1-3/4 per cent c e r t ific a te s o f Series TJ2-1931 were made as fo llo w s: Subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $1,000 were a llo t t e d 50 per cent, but not less than $500 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 ,0 0 0 but not exceeding $10,000 were a llo tte d 40 per cent, but not less than $1,000 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 0 ,0 0 0 but not exceeding $100,000 were a llo tte d 30 per cent, but not less than $4,000 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 0 0 ,0 0 0 but not exceeding $1,000,000 were a llo tte d 15 per cent, but not less than $30,000 on any one subscription; and subscriptions in amounts over $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 were a llo tte d 10 per cent, but not less than $150,000 on any one subscription. - 2 - Allotments on cash subscriptions fo r 1-7/8 per cent c e r t ific a te s of Series TD-1931 were made as fo llo w s : A l l subscriptions in amounts not exceeding $1,000 fo r any one subscriber were a llo tte d in f u l l . Sub scription s in amounts over $1 ,0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 0 0 ,0 0 0 were a llo t t e d 80 per cent, but not less than $1 ,0 0 0 on any one subscription; subscriptions in amounts over $1 0 0 ,0 0 0 but not exceeding $1 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 were a llo tte d 60 per cent, but not less than $80,000 on any one subscription.; and subscriptions in amounts over $1,000,000 were a llo tte d 35 per cent, but not less than $600,000 on any one subscription, Further d e ta ils as to subscriptions and allotments w i l l be announced when fin a l reports are received from the Federal Reserve Banks, TREASUHY DEPARTANT POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, Friday", December 12, 1930» Secretary Mellon to-day announced that the to ta l amount o f subscriptions received fo r the two issues o f Treasury c e r t ific a t e s o f indebtedness, Series TJ2-1931, 1-3/4 per cent, dated December maturing June December 15, 15, 1931, and Series TB-1 9 3 1 , 1930, maturing December 1— 7 /g 15, 1931, 15, 1930, per cent, dated was $1,457,197,000. The to ta l amount o f subscriptions a llo t t e d was $422,322,000, o f which $79*817,500 represents allotments on subscriptions fo r which Treasury c e r t ific a te s o f indebtedness o f Series TD-1930, maturing December were tendered in payment. 15,1930, Such exchange subscriptions tendered fo r Series TJ2—1931 were a llo tte d 4o per cent, and the exchange subcriptions tendered fo r Series TD-1931 were a llo t t e d 72 per cent. Allotments on other subscriptions were made on a graduated scale. The subscriptions and allotments were divided among the several Federal Reserve D is tric ts and the Treasury as follow s: SERIES TJ2-1Q31 Federal Reserve Total Subscrip- Total Exchange Total Cash Total SubscripH>ons Received: Subscriptions Subscriptions tions Allotted: Allotted: A llo t te d ? _____ __ Boston New York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco 113,247,000 9 . 6 1 2 .0 0 0 6 , 4 6 2 ,0 0 0 10.724.000 3 7 . 3 8 7 .5 0 0 92 181.000 Total 939,372,000 $ $ , 53.470.500 32.529.000 47.274.000 . 1 6 , 6 9 3 ,0 0 0 55»9^9» 0 0 0 13 218,000 1 0 , 3 4 7 ,0 0 0 9 . 6 6 7 .0 0 0 1 2 . 1 0 9 .5 0 0 1 9 . 0 8 2 .5 0 0 1 . 2 0 3 .5 0 0 1 . 6 1 3 .0 0 0 1 . 8 4 9 .5 0 0 7 . 0 8 8 .5 0 0 10.520.500 *+,599,000 1 1 8 .5 0 0 4 1 7 .5 0 0 4 9 7 .0 0 0 1 3 2 .0 0 0 137.500 $2 9 , 8 4 0 ,5 0 0 14,483,500 1 , 6 8 5 ,0 0 0 1 , 1 9 5 ,5 0 0 1 , 3 5 2 ,5 0 0 6 , 9 5 6 ,5 0 0 10,383,000 $1 3 0 , 1 0 0 , 5 0 0 $1 5 9 , 9 4 1 ,0 0 0 < 2 * SERIES TP-1951 Federal Reserve D is tric t: T otal Subscrip*tions Received: T otal Exchange Subscriptions A llo tte d : Total Cash Subscriptions A llo tte d Total Subscrip tions A llo tte d : Boston New York . Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas C ity Dallas San Francisco Treasury $ 25,8^0,000 1 7 8 , 1 6 6 ,5 0 0 HU,5 5 9 ,0 0 0 3 5 .^ 5 8 , 5 0 0 19,372,500 2 6 , 0 7 3 ,0 0 0 9 6 , 6 U2 ,5 0 0 5,3SH,ooo 3,555,500 U,lU3 , 5 0 0 15,283,500 6 2 , 3 2 5 ,0 0 0 -.... 2 1 .5 0 0 $ $ $ $5 1 7 , 8 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ ^9,977,000 Total Total Total Total Total 1 2 6 ,0 0 0 32,525,500 8 ,0 0 0 1 , 8 2 6 ,5 0 0 7 0 5 ,0 0 0 1 2 1 ,5 0 0 1 3 , 7 6 7 ,0 0 0 3 6 3 ,0 0 0 8 ,5 0 0 90,500 1 0 8 ,5 0 0 3 1 0 ,5 0 0 _____ 1 6 . 5 0 0 1 1 , 6 6 7 ,5 0 0 5^,756,000 2 2 , 6 0 0 ,0 0 0 1 9 , 8 5 2 ,5 0 0 1 2 , 7 0 7 ,5 0 0 18,757,500 3 6 , 8 9 0 ,5 0 0 3,228,000 l , 8 U l, 5 0 0 2,503,500 9,702,500 23,897,000 — .. _ — .. $218,U0U,000 1 1 , 7 9 3 ,5 0 0 8 7 , 2 8 1 ,5 0 0 2 2 , 6 0 8 ,0 0 0 2 1 , 6 7 9 ,0 0 0 1 3 ,U l 2 , 5 0 0 1 8 , 8 7 9 ,0 0 0 5 0 , 6 5 7 ,5 0 0 3 , 5 9 1 ,0 0 0 1 , 8 5 0 ,0 0 0 2 , 5 9 H, 0 0 0 9,811,000 2 U,2 0 7 ,5 0 0 1 6 .5 0 0 $2 6 8 , 3 8 1 , 0 0 0 Subscriptions Received, both series ......................... $1,^57,197,000 Exchange Subscriptions A llo tte d , both series . . . . . . 79,817,500 Cash Subscriptions A llo tte d , both series ............... 3U8,50U,500 Subscriptions A llo tte d , both series ............. . 5-28,322,000 TREASURY DEPARTIUCNT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 15, 1930. Tlie Treasury has received payments amounting to $122,989,450.22, due today, from the fo llow in g fo re ig n governments on account o f th eir funded indebtedness to the United States, of which $30,854,052.37 was fo r account o f principal,.m d $92,135,397.85 fo r account o f in te re s t. A l l payments were received in cash. P rin cip a l B e lgiu m ....................................... Czechoslovakia ......................... Estonia ........................................ Finland ....................................... Prance ........................................ Great B rita in ............................. Hungary......................... ... 1,500,000.00 55,000.00 - In terest $ 1,625,000.00 150,000.00 129,885.00 19,325,000.00 28,000,000.00 66,390,000.00 11,755.00 28,804.73 ................................ 1,260,625.00 L a tvia ........................................ 50,000.00 I t a ly . . . Lithuania .................................... Poland ......................... . . . . - 93,528.11 1,287,297.37 3,082,555.01 $30,854,052.37 $92,135,397.85 Of the p rin cip al payments received, the sum of $28,995,117.64 was fo r account of the obligation s o r ig in a lly acquired fo r cash advanced under - 2 the authority of the L ib erty bond acts. - Under the terms o f these acts a l l such cash payments of p rin cip a l must be applied to debt retirem ent. The above-mentioned amount has been applied to the Treasury c e r t ific a t e s maturing today. The balance of the payments amounting to $93,994,332.58 is a va ila b le to meet current expenditures of the Government and was so treated in the estimates submitted in the P r e s id e n ts la s t budget message. TREASURY DEPARTMENT POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, SATURDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1930 The Secretary o f the Treasury announces the selection o f the firm o f A. Ten Eyck Brown, Atlanta, Georgia, as a rch itects fo r the proposed Pederal ■building to he located at Spring, Hunter and Forsyth Streets, Atlanta, Georgia* Formal contract with the above firm w ill he entered in to as soon as t i t l e to the new s ite is vested in the United States* A* W. Mellon Secretary Of the Treasury.