View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Hr
io
,

a p#
\|j8r

(IS. freaSuitj
\

h*

LIBRARY
ROOM 5030
JUN

141972

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

/fi 6

2 7
/

cP\J

11

IMPORTS OF CATTLE UNDER QUOTA PROVISIONS OF THE
CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT
During the period January 1 to July 18, 1938
(Preliminary Figures)
:
Cattle
: Under 175
:
pounds
:
(Head)

Cattle 700
pounds
or more
(Head)___

: Dairy Cows
: 700 pounds
:
or more
:
(Head)
2,880
14,4$

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of quota

45,661
87»9$

134,323
86»2$

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
lifeline & N. H*
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St* Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

17,806
90
2,825
—
410
—
17
374
415
9
7,665
12
—
8,383
4,210
1.946

26,502
3,484
21,198
222
59
562
—
6,207
37,374
854
1,263
2,540
22
177
284
15,339

608
-•
38
—
——
31
—
—
**—
260
1,745
188

44,162

116,087

2,880

407
356
731
5

6,292
6,881
5,063

——
——w
—

1,499

18,236

Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
Elpaso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

t—
— •
10

—

(Prepared by Division of Statistics and Research, Bureau of Customs)

The Commissioner of customs to day announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to July
18, 1956, and the percentage that sueh imports hear to the totals
allowable under the quota provisions*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
|
I

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, July 29, 1936.

Press Service
No* 8*-0

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
■

imports of cattle under the quota, provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to July 18, 1936, and the percentage that such import
hear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of'quota

1

1 PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota.
Montana
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada

Cattle
Under 175
pounds
(Head.)
45,661
87.9$

17,806
90
2,825
—

~>

~

~

~

410
—

17
374
415
9
7,665
12

Cattle 700
pounds
or more
(Head)
134,323
86.2$

26,502
3,484
21,198
222
59
562

Dairy Cows
700 pounds
or more
(Head)
2,880
14.4$

$m0

MM
10
608

M

_

38

8,383
4,210
1.946

6,207
37,374
854
1,263
2,540
22
177
284
15,339

44,162

116,087

407
356
731
5

6,292
6,881
5,063

—

M

~

_

—

~

—

—

~

31

—

260
1,745
'188
2,880

I PROM

MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego

«

I
Total from Mexico

1,499

18,236

M
—

5ar„

I**

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Pjp.es§ Service
No. 8-1

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Sunday. August 2. 1936.
8/1/36.

The call by the Procurement Division for sealed bids on obsolete tax
exempt Potato Stamps, to be opened August 10, has been cancelled«
New methods for disposing of the stamps are being worked out and will
be announced shortly*
1 T h e tax exempt potato stamps represent an issue entirely distinct
from the potato

stamps*

As the result of requests from collectors the

Tc^L /■>rt-'i.cP *
potato:^*** stamps were offered for sale to collectors, at face value, for a
limited period, by the Bureau of Internal Revenue.

At the end of the period

the unsold stamps were destroyed.
The tax exempt stamps have no face value expressed in monetary terms.
The denominations of the six stamps represent varying numbers of pounds of
potatoes as tax exempt.
Under the law governing the disposal of surplus property the Depart­
ment of Agriculture turned over to the Procurement Division of the Treasury
Department the unused tax exempt stamps.

The Procurement Division, in asking

sealed bids, was following established practice in disposing of property no
longer useful to the Government.

In view of the unique character of this

property, and the interest displayed by stamp collectors, however, it was
determined that other methods would be preferable in this instance.

— oOo—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Sunday, An,gust 2, 1936.________
8/1/36.

Press Service
No. 8-1

The call by the Procurement Division for sealed bids on obsolete
tax exempt Potato Stamps, to be opened August 10, has been cancelled.
New methods for disposing of the stamps are being worked out and
will be announced shortly.
The tax exempt potato stamps represent an issue entirely distinct
from the tax paid potato stamps.

As the result of requests from collectors

the tax paid potato stamps were offered for sale to collectors, at face
value, for a limited period, by the Bureau of Internal Revenue.

At the

end of the period the unsold tax paid stamps were destroyed.
The tax exempt stamps have no face value expressed in monetary terras.
The denominations of the six stamps represent varying numbers of pounds of
potatoes as tax exempt.
Under the law governing the disposal of surplus property the Depart­
ment of Agriculture turned over to the Procurement Division of the Treasury
Department the unused tax exempt stamps.

The Procurement Division, in ask­

ing sealed bids, was following established practice in disposing of property
no longer useful to the Government.

In view of the unique character of this

property, and the interest displayed by stamp collectors, however, it was
determined that other methods would be preferable in this instance.

oO-

TRIASORY DKPABTKKNT
WASHINGTON
Press Service
8 /3 /3 6
Acting Secretary o f the Treasury Taylor announced la s t
evening th at the tenders far 150,000,000, or thereabouts,
o f 273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated la g a st 5, 1936, and maturing
la y 5 , 1937, which were offered on July 3 1, were opened a t
the Federal Reserve banks on August 3 .
The to ta l amount applied for was «169,772,000, of which
#50,019,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price

from 99.841, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.210 percent per
annua, to 99.818, equivalent to a rate o f 0.240 percent per
annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only part of the amcwnt bid

fo r a t the la t t e r price was accepted.

The average p rice o f

Treasury b i l l s to be issued i s 99.825 and the average rate i s
about 0.230 percent per annum on a bank discount b a sis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington
EOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday* August 4, 1936»_______ _
8-3-36

Press Service
No. 8-2

Acting Secretary of the Treasury Taylor announced last evening that
the tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills,
dated August 5, 1936, and maturing May 5, 1937, which were offered on
July 31, were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 3.
The total amount applied for was $169,772,000, of which $50,019,000
was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.841, equivalent

to a rate of about 0.210 percent per annum, to 99.818, equivalent to a
rate of 0.240 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.the amount bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of

The average price of

Treasury bills to be issued is 99,825 and the average rate is about 0.230
percent per annum on a bank discount basis.
ooOoo

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
____________________JULY 1936_________________________

Date of
Failure :

Re ceivershins;

First
First
First
First
First

National
National
National
National
National

Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,

Radcliffe, Iowa 1/
1-30-34
White House Station, N. J. 12-30-31
1 -18-32
Osnabrock, North Dakota
7-15-29
Sanford, Florida
1 -11-32
Lost Nation, Iowa

Standard National Bank, Chicago, Illinois
First National Bank, Veedersburg, Indiana
New First National Bank in Farmland, Indiana
First National Bank, Mullins, South Carolina
First National Bank, Villisca, Iowa

6-25-32
3-19-31
7-25-30
12-14-31
10-18-30

City National Bank, Huron, South Dakota 1/
First National Bank, Rockport, Indiana
Sioux National Bank in Sioux City, Iowa
First National Bank, Bruin, Pennsylvania *
Noble County National Bank, Caldwell, Ohio 1/

6-10-24
3-3-33
12— 8-30
9-25-33
4-18-31

1/

Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment
covering deficiency in value of assets sold, or to
complete unfinished liquidation*

•j

Formerly in Conservatorship

Total
Disbursements,
Including
Offsets Allowed:

$

8 ,766.00
594.951.00
57.835.00
1.407.364.00
132,392.00

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors :

100
87.98
60.95
73.66
86.63

272,332.00
182 ,858.00
96,626.00
13 1 .829.00
360,116.00

102.63
99.81

3,089.00

-077.58
61.89
104.99
94.52

208,197.00
2 .529.945.00
93,540.00
53,241.00

62.82
73.48
72.58

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants :

105.833

86.0266

59.85
59.333
75.08
107

100
54*85
70.333
71.025
- 053.43

43.65
107.7152
89.96016

Dividend payments during July, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent national
banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated $2,4-22,781.
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the bank­
ing holiday of March, 1933* aggregated $733,186,126.

received dividends amounting to 71*025 per cent of their claims*
The City National Bank of Huron, South Dakota, in receivership June 10, 1924,
the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank.
The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the
stockholders to meet a judgment obtained against the bank after its assets were sold
Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $3,089,
which represented 100 per cent of total liabilities*
The First National Bank of Rockport, Indiana, in receivership March 3, 1933;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $208,197, which represented 77.58 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 53*43 per cent of their claims.
The Sioux National Bank in Sioux City, Iowa, in receivership December 8, 1930;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $2,529,945, which represented 61.89 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 43*65 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Bruin, Pennsylvania, in receivership September 25,
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 7.7152 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $93,540, and the stockholders re­
ceived $519 together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Noble County National Bank of Caldwell, Ohio, in receivership April 18,
1931, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment agains

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during re­

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $53,241, which represented 94*52
per cent of total liabilities.

bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$1,4-07,364., which represented 73*66 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depos­

itors received dividends amounting to 59*333 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Lost Nation, Iowa, in receivership January 11, 1932;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $132,392, which represented 86.63 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 75*08 per cent of their claims.
The Standard National Bank of Chicago, Illinois, in receivership June 25, 1932;
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 7 per cent.

Total payments to creditors,

including offsets allowed, aggregated $272,332, and the stockholders received $23,82$
together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Veedersburg, Indiana, in receivership March 19, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregate
$182,858, which represented 99*81 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposi­

tors received dividends amounting to 100 per cent of their claims.
The New First National Bank in Farmland, Indiana, in receivership July 25, 1930;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregate

■4

$96,626, which represented 62.82 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors

received dividends amounting to 54-*85 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Mullins, South Carolina, in receivership December 14,
1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors ag­
gregated $131,829, which represented 73*4-8 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured I

I
depositors received dividends amounting to 70.333 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Villisca, Iowa, in receivership October 18, 1930; dis I
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$360,116, which represented 72.58 per cent of total liabilities.

I

Unsecured depositor I

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
Press Service

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,

¿'3
Comptroller of the Currency, today announced
the completion of the liquidation of 15 receiverships during July, 1936, making
a total of

420

receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the

so-called hanking holiday of March, 1933.

Total disbursements, including offsets

allowed, to depositors and other creditors of these

420

institutions, exclusive

of the 42 receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated $118,197,816, or an averI
age return of 74.18 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors re­
ceived dividends amounting to an average of 58.94 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Radcliffe, Iowa, in receivership January 30, 1934;
the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank.
The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the
stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

The creditor bank, from

dividends and other sources, received 100 per cent together with interest in full
amounting to 5.833 per cent.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $8,766, and the stockholders received

$410

together with the

assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of White House Station, New Jersey, in receivership
December 30, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $594>951> which represented 87*98 per cent of total liabilities
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 86.0266 per cent of their claim

c
The First National Bank of Osnabrock, North Dakota, in receivership January
18, 1932; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditor
aggregated $57,835, which represented 60.95 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecure|

depositors received dividends amounting to 59.85 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Sanford, Florida, in receivership July 15, 1929; dii

V:
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR. RELEASE, MORNING NEWSEAPESS,
^turdag^^dkLgust 8. 1936,_______
8^*5~36#

Prpc?c,
No# 8_ 3

J.E.T* 0*Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today announced the completion
of the liquidation of 15 receiverships during July, 1936, making a total of 420
receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the so-called hanking
holiday of March, 1933.

Total disbursements, including offsets allowed, to

depositors and other creditors of these 420 institutions, exclusive of the 42
receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated $118,197,816, or an average return
of 74.18 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors received
dividends amounting to an average of 58.94 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Radcliffe, Iowa, in receivership January 30, 1934;
the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank
The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the
stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

The creditor bank, from

dividends and other sources, received 100 per cent together with interest in full
amounting to 5.833 per cent.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $8,766, and the stockholders received $410 together with the
assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of White House Station, New Jersey, in receivership
December 30, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $594,951, which represented 87.98 per cent.of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 86,0266 per

cent of their claims.
The First N a tional Bank of Osnabrock, North Dakota, in receivership January
18, 1932; disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other credit­

ors aggregated $57,835, which represented 60.95 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 59.85 per cent of their claims,
The First National Bank of Sanford, Florida, in receivership July 15, 1929;

», ft
disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors aggre­

gated $1,407,364, which represented 73.66 per.cent of total liabilities*

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 59.333 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Lost Nation, Iowa, in receivership January 11, 1932;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $132,392, which represented 86.63 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 75.08 per cent of their claims*
The Standard National Bank of Chicago, Illinois, in receivership June 25, 1932;
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 7 per cent.

Total payments to creditors,

including offsets allowed, aggregated $272,332, and the stockholders received
$23,828 together with the assets remaining uncollected*
Hie First National Bank of Veedersburg, Indiana-, in receivership March 19, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $182,858, which represented 99.81 per cent of total liabilities# .Unsecured
depositors received dividends amounting to 100 per cent of their claims*
The New First National Bank in Farmland, Indiana, in receivership July 25, 1930j
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggrega­
ted $96,626, which represented 62.82 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 54.85 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Mullins, South Carolina, in receivership December
14, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other credit­
ors aggregated $131,829, which represented 73.48 per cent of total liabilities*
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 70.333 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Villisea, Iowa, in receivership October 18, 1930;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggrega­
ted $360,116, which represented 72.58 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 71.025 per cent of their claims.
The City National Bank of Huron, South Dakota, in receivership June 10, 1924;the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bp,nk.

The receiver was. appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the
stockholders to meet a judgment obtained against the hank after its assets were sold.
Disbursements, during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $3,089,
which represented 100 per cent of total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Rockport, Indiana, in receivership March 3, 1933;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated $208,197, which represented 77.58 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 53.43 per cent of their claims.
The Sioux National Bank in Sioux City, Iowa, in receivership December 8, 1930»
disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors aggrega­

ted $2,529,945, which represented 61.89 per cent of total liabilities,

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 43.65 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Bruin, Pennsylvania, in receivership September 25,
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 7.7152 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $93,540, and the stockholders
received $519 together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Noble County National Bank of Caldwell, Ohio, in receivership April 18,
1931, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

Hie receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during

receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $53,241, which represented 94.52
per cent of total liabilities.
Dividend payments during July, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent national
banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated $2,422,781,
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the banking
holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $733,186,126.

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
JULY 1936
__________

Date of
Failure:

Receiverships:

First
First
First
First
First

National
National
National
National
National

Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,

Radcliffe, Iowa l/
White House Station, N-®J.
Osnabrock, North Dakota
Sanford, Florida
Lost Nation, Iowa

1-30-3*412-30-31
1-18-32
7-15-29
1-11-32

Standard National Bank, Chicago, Illinois
First National Bank, Veedersburg, Indiana
New First National Bank in Farmland, Indiana
First National Bank, Mullins, South Carolina
First National Bank, Villisca, Iowa

6-25-32
3-19-31
7-25-30
12-1*4— 31
10-18-30

City National Bank, Huron, South Dakota i j
First National Bank, Rockport, Indiana
Sioux National Bank in Sioux City, Iowa
First National Bank, Bruin, Pennsylvania *
Noble County National Bank, Caldwell, Ohio 1/

6-10-2*43- 3~33
12- 8-30
9-25-33
*4-18-31

1J

Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment
covering deficiency in value of assets sold, or to
complete unfinished liquidation.
Formerly in Conservatorship

Total
Disbursements,
Including
Offsets Allowed:

$

8,766.00
59^,951.00
57,335.00
1,U07,36U.00

132,392.00

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

100
37.93
60.95

73.66
86.63

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

105.S33
86.O266
59.35
59.333
75.08

182.858.00

IO2.63
99.31

96,626.00

6 2.82

131,829.00

360,116.00

73 M
72.53

3 ,089.00
208,197.00

-0-

-0-

77.52

53M

272.332.00

2,529,9^5.00
93,5*4-0.00
53,2*4-1.00

61.89

10*4-.99
9^.52

107

100

5^.35
70.333
71.025

U3.65
107.7152
89.96016

IMPORTATIONS OF CATTLE, CREAM AND SEED POTATOES
UNDER QUOTA PROVISIONS OF THE CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT
During the Period January 1 to July 25, 1936
(Preliminary Figures)

: Dairy Cows
: 700 Pounds
:
Or More
:
(Head)

:
:
:
:

Cream
(Gal.)

White Or
Irish Seed
Potatoes
(Pounds)

6,569
••

20,668,905
45.9#

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

Cattle 700
Pounds Or
More
(Head)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

48,333
93.1#

137,163
88.0#

FROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington

18,084
90
2,916
431
17
375
514
9
9,585
12
8,620
4,408
1,383

—
26,751
3,482
21,333
222
65
562
6,264
37,633
855
1,328
3,025
22
236
289
15,786

31
—
**
274
1,887
»
262

**
mm
6,479
•
**

1,244,375
86,000

46,444

117,853

3,146

6,569

20,668,905

797
356
731
5

6,729
6,881
5,643
57

—
—
•

»

1,889

19,310

-

-

Total from Canada

3,146
15.7#

—
»
10
—
644
38
—

1JL
—
52
26
—
—

1
-

■

52,500
•*
91,850
180
2,147,915
*
1,778,236
144,510

15,122,759

580

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

(Prepared fcy.ECHsioxTo? Stati

**
’
**
-

The Commissioner

of Customs to day announced preliminary

figures for the imports of cattle, cream and sded potatoes, "under
the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period
January 1 to July 25, 1936, and the percentage that such imports
hear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions«

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
|

Washington

POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
'
Wednesday, August 5, 1936,

Presq Servipp
jj0 . 8-4

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the imports
of cattle, cream and seed potatoes, under the quota provisions of the Canadian
Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to July 25, 1936, and the percentage that
such imports "bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions*
ï Cattle
: Under 175
ï Pounds
! (Head)
TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada

48,333
93.15g

mm

mm

mm

: Cattle 700
• Pounds or
i
More
J
(Head)
137 163
88.0#

—

mm

mm

mm

431
«

» .

—

M

17
375
514
9
9,585
12

—

46,444

117,853

797
356
731
5

6,729
6,881
5,643
57

1,889

19,310

- ,

M

8,620
4,408
mm

mm

mm

mm

—

**

mm

mm

*

White or
Irish Seed
Cream ! Potatoes
(Gal.)! (Pounds)
9

9

•

6,569
-----

52,500

10
~

—

—

-

*•

9 t9

52
mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

38

mm

mm

mm

_

mm

mm

9m

mm

mm

mm

MMM

rnm

mm

mm

«

9m

mm

mm

644

—

~

mm

26

31

—

.

M
~

M
„

274
1,887
~

~

—

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

TOTAL PROM MEXICO

M
—

mm

mm

mm

15,122,759

580
1,244,375

86.000
6,569

9m mm mm

—

1,778,236
144,510

6,479

PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego

91,850
180
2,147,915

1

262
3,146

20,668,905
45.9#

11
*"•

—

1.383

—

—
mm

*•

26,751
3,482
21,333
222
65
562
6,264
37,633
855
1,328
3,025
22
236
289
— - •+
15.786

M

3,146
15.7#

mm

18.084
90
2,916
mm

Dairy Cowsi
700 Pounds*
or more :
(Head)
i

mm mm mm
mm mm mm

20,668,905

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

August

Sta

1936«

TO MR. FUSSELL

(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:

There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes under the quota pro­
visions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period from
January 1 to July 25, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimebgraphed, kindly have 40
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

«* 2 *•

cameras
calf and kid leather
surgical instruments
if the collector of customs co^erned shall 1». satisfied hy doc«*ntary
evidence that the contract of purchase or other a g r e e d pursuant to
which they were exported from Germany was entered into after July
1936a

(signed) frank Dow
Acting

APPROVED:

Commissioner of Customs*

August 4 # 1936*

(signed) WAT3S® C* TAYIOB.
Acting Secretary of the Treasury.

(pv VAf'V'fvi

jP/î

'

' t U w ^

^

(T j • \i

4.«*«*■»/
'()»|ê^4Av.

A&iS

jA

„,

.

1

k

râ.A, VvW

(^H 0Li V j>

^
^ t4«<

'*X-.-

i

r

(ï. d .'/T- T ^ O )
Countervailing Duties— Genian Pro docte
Treasury Decision 48360 not applicable to certain importations
of cameras , calf and kid leather, and surgical instruments.
t r e a s u r y depar t m e n t

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,
WASHINGTON, D. C.
TO COLLECTORS OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS CONCERNED:
Deference is made to Treasury Decision 48360, approved June 4, 1936,
in which it was announced that countervailing duties would he Imposed
upon certain German products.
The Department is nos in receipt of official advice to the effect
that for any transactions concluded after July 25, 1936, which cover
the indirect or direct exportation of the following goods to the United
States, vis.:

photographic apparatus, calf and goat leather, and

surgical instruments, the German Government will neither authorize the
use of the scrip and bond procedure nor permit the payment of a public
or private premium or subsidy, nor the employment of other German means
of payment than reichmarks freely convertible into foreign currencies
or free reidfemarlrs

usable within the country.

In view of the foregoing, the provisions of Treasury Decision
48360 shall not apply to direct or indirect imports from Germany of
the following commodities named in that decision:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, August 5, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-5

The following Decision by the Commissioner of Customs has been approved
by the Secretary of the Treasury.
(T. D. 48463)
Countervailing Duties— German Products
Treasury Decision 48360 not applicable to certain importations
of cameras, calf and kid leather, and surgical instruments.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
TO COLLECTORS OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS CONCERNED;
Reference is made to Treasury Decision 48360, approved June 4, 1936, in
which it was announced that countervailing duties would be imposed upon certain
German products.
The Department is now in receipt of official advice to the effect that for
any transactions concluded after July 25, 1936, which cover the indirect or
direct exportation of the following goods to the United States, viz.: Photo­
graphic apparatus, calf and goat leather, and surgical instruments, the German
Government will neither authorize the use of the scrip and bond procedure not
permit the payment of a public or private premium or subsidy, nor the employment
of other German means of payment than reichmarks freely convertible into foreign
currencies or free reichmarks usable within the country.
In view of the foregoing, the provisions of Treasury Decision 48360 shall
not apply to direct or indirect imports from Germany of the following commodities
named in that decision:
Cameras
Calf and kid leather
Surgical instruments

-

2

~

if the Collector of Customs concerned shall he satisfied hy documentary evi­
dence that the contract of purchase or other agreement pursuant to which they
were exported from Germany was entered into after July 25, 1936.
(signed)

Frank Dow

Acting Commissioner of Customs.

APPROVED:

August 4, 1936.

(signed) Vayne C. Taylor
Acting Secretary of the Treasury.

~o0o>

xmats or biscxues Liuto** abb «ibes m
M

duties collected

m

1*3*

***4*
¿un*

t
i

*
DISTILLE# LÎUÜOR8 (Proof Callona)*
Stook te CttatM« Bondad far«»
htasas at beginning
fatai Ir^ort« (fr«« m û Bat1able)
Ata!labi« for Consumption
Enteres into Ce&suaptida (e)

7,554,0*7
7*4.737
4.58ft.880
784,784
r ostiìì

Stoak in Customs Bondad Warehouses
at and

t
t

Hay

lamo

i M ___ i___

3 .5 9 5 ,1 «
!,*<*,«34
4,858.034
»70,055

fl«««l toar

im.

lui

3, 522, 444
10,17«,«77
23*701,521

3*$»«*2$5
<78*258
524*534

m i

4#514,433

4*435*873
u,n4,fu

9*8<>3*255

.* i'OSirwpin'T

7*478*335
—

***75*3

3,781*874

3,344,0*3

3,522,444

3,701,874

3*322,444

m u * 8S8SS (Liquid Callonayi
Stook in Coatono Bondad faim»
hsueca «t beginning
fatal Sesorta (Erta and Duti&bla)
Available far Coneuaption
Enterad into Consumption (a)
•gpBrloi'fMi Cuota» Cwtodp 1 ^
Sioak in Cuoiano Bended «aro»
house* at end

1*7*3*2*5
»30,157
1,834,082
133**33

».<17.577
25**738
1,828,471
123,108
1,43«

».575.77*
142,533
1,717*3*3
174 ,l4 i

1,340,348
2,447,177
4,188,125
2,521,002
Tyy®i J

2*834,745
2,178,445
4*033,130
2,440,433
71* 54¡r

1,437*3*8

1*783,325

1,540,348

1,437*3«®

1,540,748

SOAmine «IBIS (Liquid Callona)
Stook la Casto®« Bondad «aro»
houaee at beginning
total Inporta (froo asé Dutiable)
Avallabia far Canouaptiea
Enterad lata Consumption (a)

234,481
22,431
*44,314

*30.775
25*377
246 572
4,822
--- je*

231*3*7
18,304
303,831
18,344

*88,032
223,244
5»»«335
>80,141
****PP

337*173
*53.457
530,440
288,483

288,032

224,713

288,031

1 2,443,488 133*333*983
♦ 2 ,220,305
152,314
219*313 3,045,542
5 » .» « ____i i k m . - ».58».057

735.1711,045
3*035*375
»■7»*,55»

I 2 ,4 1 2 ,4 0

$40,342,3*8

*3*335

1

»m m

Stook in Curtan# Bondad «ara»
hautia at «ad
BOTISS COLLECTED 08 »
DI«tilled Liquor«
Still «lato
Sparkling flato

f

total Butioa Collootad ea Liquor«
total Sdiiee Collootad on Oilier
total
Far

m

5,7»7

2,443,007
»57,407
»<».55»

$ 2,71**347

_

234,481

I 2,734,373 132,000,424

os Callaated
..
Callaotod en Liquor«

(n) ineluding mrithdr&oals f«r sbif supplies and dlplonatio u«a.
( 0*8a p « » ,a 4

B y j h j i . - n i M a ^ 'a a ^ ^ n ^ o n ^ a l . n O « » t . i M l Ba,a n il n a h ,

S u n «

§ É Wll'MflTiiiS^

S ] /y
/

(f V

s

»

Imports of distilled liquor during the fiscal year 1936 aggregated
9,803,235 gallons, an increase of 31 percent over the imports of the
preceding year, it was announced hy the Bureau of Customs today.
This increase was due * *

largely to the reduction in the rates

of duty on whiskey, gin and rum under the terms of the trade agreements
with Canada, Netherlands and Haiti, respectively.

As a result of the

increased importations, duties collected on imports of distilled liquors
aggregated $ 3 ^ 3 5 ^ 9 8 9 during the fiscal year 1936, a decrease of only
8 percent from the previous year's collections, flfnfnpUo«4feo fairt-thr*
duties were reduced 50 percent on most of the types of distilled liquor
imported.
As a result of the trade agreement with France, which became
effective on June 15, 1936, the quantity of wines, both still and
sparkling, which paid duties and were released for consumption during
June, greatly exceeded the totals for either the previous month or the
corresponding month of last year.

This was much more noticeable in the

case of champagne, for which the rates of duty were cut in half.

In

the ease of still wines, the reduced rate of duty a p p l i e d ^ o n l y j e r t a i n
types.
The following table shows the quantities of distilled liquors and
wines imported during the month of June, with comparative figures for
May 1936 and June 1935, and with the total for the fiscal years 1935
and 1936,

This table also presents a statement of the duties collected

on distilled liquors and wines as
on all other imported commodities

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, August 5, 1936,

Press Service
No. 8-6

Imports of distilled liquor during the fiscal year 1936 aggregated
9,803,235 gallons, an increase of 31 percent over the imports of the preceding year,
it was announced hy the Bureau of Customs today.
This increase was due largely to the reduction in the rates of duty on
whiskey, gin and rum under the terms of the trade agreements with Canada, Nether­
lands and Haiti, respectively.

As a result of the increased importations, duties

collected on imports of distilled liquors aggregated $33,353,989 during the fiscal
year 1936, a decrease of only 8 per cent from the previous year!s collections,
although duties were reduced 50 per cent on most of the types of distilled

liquor

imported.
As a result of the trade agreement with France, which became effective on
June 15, 1936, the quantity of wines, both still and sparkling, which paid duties
and were released for consumption during June, greatly exceeded the totals for
either the previous month or the corresponding month of last year.

This was much

more noticeable in the case of champagne, for which the rates of duty were cut in
half.

In the case of still wines, the reduced rate of duty applied only to certain

types.
The following table shows the quantities of distilled liquors and wines
imported during the month of June, with comparative figures, for May 1936 and June
1935, and with the total for the fiscal years 1935 and 1936.
presents

This table also

a statement of the duties collected on distilled liquors and wines as

compared with the duties collected on all other imported commodities.

IMPORTS OF DISTILLED LlCjJORS AND WINES AND DUTIES COLLECTED THEREON
JUNE, 1936.

June
May
June
Fiscal Year
........
1936
...1935
__ I22£_______
__
1Q7C
DISTILLED LI QJJORS
(Proof Gallons):
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning ... 3,964,083 3,595,140
3,588,255
3,522,644
4,514,633
Total Imports (Free
and d u t i a b l e ) ,
724,797 1,262,894
478,258
10,178,877
6,699,879
Available'for Con­
sumption ....... 4,688,880 4,868,034
4,066,513
13,701,521
11,214,512
Entered into Con­
sumption (a) ....
984,784
890,066
524,536
9,803,255
7,470,339
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at e n d ........ 3,701,876 3,964,083
3,522,644
3,701,876
3,522,644
STILL WINES
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning ... 1,703,925 1,637,673
1,575,396
1,540,948
1,834,745
Total Imports (Free
and dutiable) ...
130,157
190,798
142,533
2,647,177
2,198,445
Available for Con­
sumption ....... 1,834,082 1,828,471
1,717,929
4,188,125
4,033,190
Entered into Con­
sumption (.a)....
193,893
123,108
174,168
2,521,002
2,440,699
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at e n d ........ 1,637,508 1,703,925
1, d 4 0 ,948
1,637,508
1,540,948
SPARKLING WINES
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning....
234,481
230,995
291,327
288,091
337,173
Total Imports (Free
and Dutiable)
12,435
15,577
18,504
223,244
253,467
Available for Con­
sumption ...... .
246,916
246,572
309,831
511,335
590,640
Entered into Con­
sumption (.a).....
29,995
6,812
18,944
280,161
288,483
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at e n d ........
216,919
234,481
288,091
216,919
288.091
DUTIES COLLECTED ON
Distilled Liquors $2,443,007 $2,220,305
$2,469,688
$33,353,989
$36,191,045
Still Wines
167,409
152,916
215,919
3,065,542
3,039,375
_ Sparkling Wines
100,551
39,246
111.372
1.581,093
1.712.568
J-uiai Duties Collect-JM. on ^iQuors
$2,710,967 $2,412,467
$2,796,979
$38,000,624
$40,942,988
including withdrawals for ship supplies and diplomat ic use.

For release

i

JL-.- Mfc.-'

» x * ^ a w

J)

/&■

sieraiag papers
1936.

A*
^ v

<jk*t <f- JKfJl
*~ 7

I#* D, Madland, Chief national Bank Ixaminer for the Twelfth Federal
Reserve district, has tendered his resignation, effective Monday, August
10th,

Mr. Madland has accepted an executive position with the Seattle-

First National Bank of Seattle, Washington*

He has acted as Chief National

Bank Examiner in the Twelfth District for three and a half years, and has
been connected with the Comptroller1« Office since 191^.
The Comptroller of the Currency, J . F. T. 0 *Connor, with the approval
of Henry Morgenthau, Jr,, Secretary of the Treasury, has designated Frank
W, Shanley of San Francisco as Ac ting Chief National Bank Examiner,
Shanley was first appointed a national bank examiner in 1913 •

Mr,

H© has had

experience as an executive officer of a national bank, and for thepast
three years has been assigned to the Twelfth Federal Reserve District as a
national bank examiner, with headquarters in San Francisco,

After successful!)!

passing his examination fojjnational bank examiner in If IB, Mr, Shanley was
offered a more lucrative position with a national bank, which he accepted.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Sunday. August 9, 1936.
______
8-7-36.

Press Service
No. 8-7

L.L. Madland, Chief National Bank Examiner for the Twelfth Federal Reserve
District, has tendered his resignation, effective Monday, August 10th.

Mr.

Madland has accepted an executive position with the Seattle-First National Bank
of Seattle, Washington.
Twelfth

He has acted as Chief National Bank Examiner in the

District for three and a half years, and has been connected with the

Comptrollers Office since 1919.
The Comptroller of the Currency, J.F.T. 0*Connor, with the approval of
Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, has designated Frank W, Shanley
of San Francisco as Acting Chief National Bank Examiner.
appointed a national bank examiner in 1918,
executive officer of a national bank,

Mr. Shanley was first

He has had experience as an

and for the past three years has been

assigned to the Twelfth Federal Reserve District as a national bank examiner,
with headquarters in San Francisco.

After successfully passing his examination

for national bank examiner in 1918, Mr. Shanley was offered a more lucrative
position with a national bank, which he accepted.
ooOoo

IMPORTS OF DOUGLAS FIR AND WESTERN HEMLOCK UNDER THE QUOTA
PROVISIONS OF THE CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT
During the Period January 1 to July 25, 1936.
(Preliminary Figures)

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPOSTS
Percent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N. H.
Mas sachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
Vermont
Washington

: Mixed Fir : Total Fir
: & Hemlock : & Hemlock
: (Bd. Ft.) : (Bd. Ft.)

Douglas : Western
Fir
: Hemlock
(Bd. Ft.) : (Bd. Ft.)
50,585,062

258,116
—
7,053,430
3,689,669
9,375,173
35,683
8,934,195
42,415
5 ,022,120
9,263,508
19,534
274,995
346,728
6,269,496

19,155,629

18,628,769

45,228

2,958,707
-

..

1,917,754
391,961
95,064
5,072
12,066,800
•«

1,573,968
2,808,672
pp
89,225
161,885

-

15,670,062
•
m
-

-

88,369,460
35.3$

303,344
2,958,707
8,971,184
4,081,630
9,470,237
40,755
21,000,995
42,415
22,266,150
12,072,180
19,534
274,995
435,953
6,431,381

(Dyiapw-r^-tnr-UiTialorr of Statistics and' ReèèAx-ch, BïOrëaü ôî"CTTStôim$t

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures
for the imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock, under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from
January 1 to July 25, 1936, and the percentage that such imports
bear to the total allowable under the quota provisions,

as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesdayt August 11, 1936._______
8-10-36.

Press Service
No. 8-8

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
the imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock, under the quota provisions
of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from January 1 to July 25, 1936,
and the percentage that such imports hear to the total allowable under the quota
provisions, as follows:
•
•

Customs Districts
TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Qpota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N.H.
Massachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
Vermont
Washington

î Douglas
:
Pir
î (Bd. Ft.)
50,585,062

258,116
7,053,430
3,689,669
9,375,173
35,683
8,934,195
42,415
5,022,120
9,263,508
19,534
274,995
346,728
6,269,496

Sawed Timber and Lumber
Western
: Mixed Fir :
Hemlock
: & Hemlock :
(Bd. Ft.}
: (Bd. Ft.) :
19,155,629
18,628,769

45,228
*-.i* ■<* **
1 ,917,754
391,961
95,064
5,072
12 ,066,800
------1 ,573,968
2 ,808,672
----- --- . ~ 89,225
161,885

« - - ~ 2, 958, 707
- - « « —
- - x - „ « ~ -

- « - « 15, 670, 062
- _ - - —
- - «
- - —
—
-

Total Fir
& Hemlock
(Bd.Ft.)
88,369,460
35.3$

303,344
2,958,707
8,971,184
4,081,630
9,470,237
40,755
21,000,995
42,415
22,266,150
12,072,180
19,534
274,995
435,953
6,431,381

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR THE PRESS

August 10, 1936.

RECEIPTS OF SILVER 31 THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended August 7, 1936:
Philadelphia ........... ..........
San Francisco..... ................
Denver ............. ....... ........
Total for week ended August 7, 1936..
Total receipts through August 7, 1936

1,677,296,13 fine ounces
it
578,273,87 h
I
I
w
18.357.47
«
n
2,273,927.47
it
95,549,484.64 II

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended August 7, 1936:
Philadelphia................................... .
New York ... ♦.V . ........................
San Francisco....... ...................
Denver ............
New Orleans..... ......... ....................
Seattle.... .............. ...... .
I Total for week ended August 7, 1936...............
I Total receipts through August 7, 1936........ .. .*

258.00 fine ounces
2,622.65 «
«

2,880.65
112,965,479.01

«
»

»
»

I RECEIPTS OF COLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Week ended August 7, 1936:
Imports
Secondary
Philadelphia......... .....
$
20,517,81 $145,040.80
New York ........... ......
6,398,900,00
1 2 2 ,1 0 0 .0 0
San Francisco..............
234,563.90
27.447.55
Denver ............... .....
20,889.07
21,127,32
New Orleans.......... .....
23.674.56
Seattle........... ........
18.232.66
Total for week ended August 7, 1936...$6,674,870.78 $357,622.89

Hew,
Domestic
$
1,060,36
258,900,00
1,989,219,45
662,366,11
47,85
478.720.09
$3,390,313.86

COLD RECEIVED BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND THE TREASURER»S OFFICE;
(Under Secretary»s Order of December 28, 1933)
*
Received by Federal Reserve Banks:
Week ended August 5 ....... .
Received previously.............
Total to August 5 ...............
■Received by Treasurer’s Office?
Week ended August 5...,...,..
Received previously,.........
Total to August 5............
NOTE :

___
G-old Coin
$
16,139.40
31.669.486.62
$31,685,626.02

Gold Certificates
$
210,638,00
110.020.520.00
$110,231,158.00

$

200.00

$

1 ,000,00

$

268.456.00
268,656.00

$

2.489.Ò2Q.00
2,490,020.00

Gold bars deposited with the New York Assay Office
in the amount of $200,572.69 previously reported.

TREASURY department
Washington
FOR
WMSI, I0MIIGNEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. August 11. 1?368/10/36

Press Service/
\
s

Secretary o f the Treasury Morgenth.au announced la s t evening
that th e tenders for #50,000,000, or thereabouts, o f 273-day |
Treasury b i l l s , dated August 12, 1936, and maturing May 12, 1987
which were offered on August 7 , were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 10*
The to ta l amount applied for was f 155,236,000, of which
150,090,000 was accepted.

Except fo r one bid o f #10,000, the

accepted bids ranged in p rice from 99.864, equivalent to a
rate o f about 0.179 percent per annua, to 99.832, equivalent
to a ra te of about 0.222 percent per annum, on a bank discoun
b a s is .

Only part of the amount bid for at the la tte r price

was accepted.

The average price o f Treasury b i l l s to be

issued i s 99.839 and the average rate i s about 0.213 pereen
per annum on a bank discount basis*

TREASURY DEPAR TIGHT
Washington
EOR RELEASE-, MORNING 1GÏÏSPAPERS,
Tuesday;'August 11, 1936.
8-10-36

Press Service
Ho. 8-9

-Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced lest evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury hills, dated
August 13, 1936, and maturing May 12, 1937, which were offered on
August 7, were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 10.
The total amount applied for was $155,235,000, of which $50,090,000
was accepted, G x c e p t for one bid of $10,000, the accepted bids ranged
in price from 99.864, equivalent to a rate of about 0.179 oercent per
annum, to 99,832, equivalent to a rate of about 0.222 percent ner annum,
on a bank discount basis.
price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for at the latter

The average price of Treasury bills to be issued is

99.839 and the average rate is about 0.213 percent per annum on a. bank
discount basis.

IMPORTS OF COMMODITIES FROM THE PHILIPPINES UNDER
QUOTA PROVISIONS OF PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENCE ACT
During the Period January 1 to July 25, 1956
(Preliminary Figures)

:
S u g a r s
:
Unrefined
: Coconut Oil : Refined
: (Pounds)
:
(Pounds)
: (Pounds)
TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

198,761,089 81,148,276
72.5$
44.4$

1,370,941,821
76.5$

:
: Cordage *
: (Pounds)
2,211,354
36.9$

CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maryland
Massaehusett s
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin

*

8,228,760
2,102,650
21,317,150
34,765,620
101,898,138
5,640,180
24,804,841
3,750

Quota year commended May 1.

17,583,410
499,329
3,744,293
18,312,771
«*
«
6,336,753
34,671,720

8,953,785
9,016,528
7,917
58,674,892
241,590,706
382,313,560
49,076
541,523,758
128,811,599
—

170,662
37,284
44,210
156,105
—
30,496
6,251
25,716
955,409
2,048
79,490
11,371
4,111
13,615
1,837
118,292
345,995
14,677
105,788
87,997

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, Morning Newspapers,
Wednesday, August 12, 1936.

5ross Service
No. 8-10

u.

The Comnissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for imports of commodities coming into the ttoited
States from the Philippine Islands, under the quota provisions
of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935,
for the period January 1 to July 25, 1936, and the percentage
that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the quotas,
as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, Morning Newspapers,
Wednesday, August 12,1936.

Press Service
Ho. 8-10

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for im­
ports of commodities coming into the United States from the Philippine Is­
lands, under the quota provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and the
Cordage Act of 1935, for the period January 1 to July 25, 1936, and the per­
centage that such imports hear to the totals allowable under the quotas, as
follows:
IMPORTS OF COMMODITIES FROM THE PHILIPPINES UNDER
QUOTA PROVISIONS OF PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENCE ACT
During the Period January 1 to July 25, 1936
(Preliminary Figures)

:
; :Coconut Oil :
:
(Pounds)
:
TOTAL IMPORTS
198,761,089
Percent of Quota
44.4$
CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
8,228,760
Maryland
2,102,650
Massachusetts
21,317,150
Michigan
—
New Orleans
34,765,620
New York
101,898,138
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
5,640,180
—
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
—
St, Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
24,804,841
Virginia
Washington
3,750
Wi sconsin
*
____ commenced May 1.
*
Quota year

s

I
1
:

u g a r s
Refined
:
Unrefined
(Pounds) :
(Pounds)
81,148,276
72.5$

jm
—
—

17,583,410
499,329

1,370,941,821
76.5$

8,953,785
9,016,528
7,917
—

_

3,744,293
—
18,312,771
—

241,590,706
382,313,560
49,076
541,523,758
—

—

6,336,753

_

128,811,599

—

34,671,720
-

2,211,354
36.9$
170,662
37,284
44,210
156,105

58,674,892

_

—

Cordage *
(Pounds)

_

30,496
6,251
25,716
955,409
2,048
79,490
11,371
4,111
13,615
1,837
118,292
345,995
14,677
105,788
87,997

'IMPORTS OF CATTLE UNDER QUOTA PROVISIONS OF THE
CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT
During the Period January 1 to August 1» 1936
(Preliminary Figures)

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)__

50,920
139,061
3,241
98.0#_________ 89.5#____________ IS«2#

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Mas sachusett s
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio

Total from Mexico

18,706
90
2,916
•»
438
m

26,808
3,482
21,569

222
66

**
**

10

a.
8,739
4,422
1.528

340
289
16,413

•
672
38
**
—
31
*»
*■*
—
298
1,928
264

48,682

119,288

3,241

1,022
419
792
5

7,089
6,925
5,702
57

2,238

19,773

17
395
514
9
10,896

12

562
6,535
37,772
855
1,328
3,025

22

-

IIWLllW'JWLWMiWIWWWW'WWWWIWWWWIIIdM

-Research^,.»Buras;a of Customs!»

S W /
O
^y

/4?
/ / >15 #

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to August

1,

1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the totals

allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, August 12, 1936.

Press Service
No, 8-1Ì

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period.January’1 to August 1, 1936,

the percentage that such

'

imports hear to the totals fillowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)
50,920
98.0#

PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana. & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

18,706
. 90
2,916
— - —
438
~ — —
17
395
514
9
10,896
12
- ~ ~
8,739
4,422
1.528

Total from Canada

48,682

119,288

1,022
419
792
5

7,089
6,925
5,702
57

2,238

19*773

Customs Districts

PROM MEXICO
Arizona
PI Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

:
:
:
:

.... .

:
:
:
:

Cattle 700
Pounds
or more
(Head)
139,061
89.3#

26,808
3,482
21,569
222
66
562
- - «
6,535
37,772
855
1,328
3,025
22
340
289
16.413

: Dairy Cows
: 700 Pounds
: or more
: , (Head)
3,241
16.2#

M M M M
10
** w
^
672
38

31
M

M

..

298
1,928
264
3,241

Sörth«»«* Patrol Metriet, with headquarter» at Sarre,
XofttasAy «1X1 «oscilli of the croato» » o o U w U «
district« of no«. 39 (Oregon)* 30 (Washington)»
33 (Montana asá Idaho)* 84 (Dakota)* 33 (Daluth
and Superior), and 37 (Wieconein)*
It le reflected «Hat yon taka the neeeeeafy »tep» to placo
thl« order la effect«

^V i J

^ c

The Comnisstoner of Gusto®*,
Treasury Department»
Washington, D. 0*

Stri
Iffestive September l, 1936» & • castoni« bordar patrol*
now under thè jurisdietioa of mrloas eollectors of castoni«
« t u ho transfer*«*! to tk» Oaatoms Agency Service. The land
OH# water bouadarias of thè United Stati» vili "ho divi&sd iato
feur dietriets and aa office* vili ho designatili to ho la eharge
of thè e o t o n potrei la eaeh of m e four distriets. The foar
offloors la eharge vili ho under U hi immediate supervision of
thè Bepaty CoHnaissloaer in Oharge of tho Oastoas Ag«acy Service»
la Washington» B. 0.
D » foar casto®» potrei districi* «ai tfceir reapective hoadqpiarters vili ho ss follo**:
Northeast Patrol Bistrlet» vith he&dqparto» st Beffalo»
Beo toste* vili cossi st of tho costoso oollectioa
dietrista of Bès. 38 (Mchigea)* 41 (Ohio)* 9 (Beffalo)*
8 (BoChester)* 7 (St. Lawrence), 2 (Teraont), 1 (Maine
vai Beo Hampshire)* 4 (Massachusetts). 5 (modo Island),
6 (Connecticut), 10 (S*v Mete)* H (Jhiladelphia) » 13
(Maryland) » aad 14 (Tlrglnia).
Scrathe&st Patrol Bistri et» vith heoà^rtero et Jacksonville,
florida* vili cessisi of m e casto®» oollectioa dietriet»
of Boa. 15 (Borth Carolina)» 14 (South Carolina), 17
(Georgia) » Il (florida) » li (Behllo) » asd SS (Beo Orlasse).
Southwest Patrol Metrici, vith headqo&rters at 11 Paso* tool,
vili coasist of thè costone oolleotìon distriets of Beo»
SI (SaMme)» 22 (Galwsatoa)* 23 (San Antonio)» 24 (SI Paso),
28 (Arizona)» 26 ( M e Diego), 27 (Ioni Angeles), aad 23
(Ssa frane!soo).

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday, August 13, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-12

Secretary Morgenthau today made public the following order:
"The Commissioner of Customs,
Treasury Department,
Washington, D.C.
Sir:
•

.E^fe^ lve September 1, 1936, the customs border patrols now under the

K ? lC.
tl0n 0V ar-0US 00lleCtors
s t e r n s will be transf“
to t £
will be divided inli0? ’ 'a ? iand(.and water boundaries of the United States
he in c h S j e of t h * J ^ ^ ^ f c t s and an officer will be designated to
° L , “ ° . ee °f the ^customs patrol in each of the four districts.
The four
officers in charge will be under the immediate supervision of the Deputy
Commissioner m Charge of the Customs Agency Service.

will^e a r m “

" PatrQl distri° ts “ d their respective headquarters

Northeast Patrol District, with headquarters at Buffalo
New York will consist of the customs collection districts
of Nos. 33 (Michigan , 41 (Ohio), 9 (Buffalo), 8 Rochester),
I i J Ë La"ren°e)' 2 (Vermont), 1 (Maine and New Hampshire),
4 (Massachusetts), 5 (Rhode Island), 6 (Connecticut), 10
ew York), 11 (Philadelphia), 13 (Maryland), and 14 (Virginia).
Southeast Patrol District, with headquarters at Jacksonville,
lorida, will consist of the customs collection districts
in
(H o rth.Carolina), 16 (South Carolina), 17 (Ceorgia)
18 (Florida), 19 (Mobile), and 20 (New Orleans).
S
Southwest Patrol District, with headquarters at El Paso, Texas,
will consist of the customs collection districts of Nos. 21
(Sabine), 22 (Galveston), 23 (San Antonio), 24 (El Paso),
26 (Arizona), 25 (San Diego), 27 (Los Angeles), and 28
(San Francisco).
"Northwest Patrol District, with headquarters at Havre, Montana,
Will consist of the customs collection districts of Nos. 29
(Oregon), 30 (Washington), 33 (Montana and Idaho), 34
(Dakota), 36 (Duluth and Superior), and 37 (Wisconsin).
in effect.reqUeSt8d that y °U tak® th® neoessarV steps to place this order
Very truly yours,.
(Signed)

EL Morgenthau, Jr,
Secretary of the Treasury1*

C0ÜKÎSR7AILING DUTIES —

GERMAN PRODUCTS

Treasury Deo is ion 48360, 0« an»nded by Treasury Décision 48444 and
Modified by Treasury Deo is ion 48463, not applicable to certain im­
portations of the several classes of commodities listed therein.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT,
OIFIGB OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
WASHINGTON, D. 0.

TO COLLECTORS OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS CONCERNED:
The Department is in receipt of official advice to the effect
that, with respect to any dutiable merchandise which sill be or
has been exported directly or Indirectly from Germany pursuant to
agreements entered into after August 2, 1936, the German Government
has taken measures to Insure that no scrip or bond procedure was
or will be allowed, no public or private bounty or subsidy was or
will ba paid, and that the usa of no German currency other than
free gold exchange marks or free inland marks was or will be per­
mitted*
In view of the foregoing, the provisions of Treasury Decision
48360, as mended by Treasury Decision 48444 and modified by Treasury
Decision 48463, shall not apply to direct or Indirect imports from
Germany of the commodities listed therein If the collector of customs
concerned shall he satisfied by documentary evidence that the contract
of purchase or other agreement pursuant to which they were exported
from Germany was entered into after August 2, 1936» or, in the cases
of cameras, calf and kid leather, and surgical instruments, after
July 25, 1936.

Acting Commissioner of Customs
Approved:

Secretary of the Treasury

XSH/MS 8/14/36

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
O F F IC E

OF

TH E SEC R ETA R Y

W A SH IN G T O N

COMMISSIONER OF
ACCOUNTS AND DEPOSITS

August

6»

1936«

70 MR. GASTON:

During the month, of July* 1936, the following
market traraactions to ok place in Government securities
investment accounts:
Total purchases . . • . • ♦$15,471,700
Total sales . • . . . • » »

5,000

for

TREASURY DEP A R M U T
Washington
August 17, 1936«

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

RECEIPTS OP STIVER BY THE MUTTS M D ASSApOgllCESi.
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933; as amended
Week ended August 14, 1936:
Philadelphia................... .................

3 0 0 ,0 0 0 .6 3 f i n e ounces
3 0 4 ,7 3 5 .5 5
lf
f
1 0 .4 1 1 .7 6
,f
I
$ 1 5 ,1 6 7 .9 4
#
"
9 6 ,1 6 4 ,6 5 2 .5 8
tt
|

San Erancisco ...... •••*...... .............
Denver
...... •••«*••......... .........
Total for week ended August 14, 1936..............
Total receipts through August 14, 1936............
SILVER TP ¿NSFERRED TO UNITED STATESI.
_ _ _ s
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934;
Week ended August 14, 1936:

Philadelphia...... ............... ....... ‘g
New York............................ *......... .
San Erancisco ....... ?........................ .
Denver ...... ........... .............. .......
New Orleans................................
Seattle ......................... §•............
TotaJ for week ended August 14, 1936...........
Total receipts through August 14, 1936.........

131.10 fine ounce
1,007.00
11
w

1,138.10
112,966,617.11

n
"

"

RECEIPTS OE GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:

New
Domestic
Imports
Secondary, _
Week ended August 14, 1936:
Ì37,Ò6~
..$
7,925,08 $154,037,45 $
Philadelphia
55,500,00
.. 5,981,600.00 155,300,00
New York .......................
1,504,563,77
..
564,812.87
30,080,39
San Erancisco
574,056,50
..
54,056.49
19,085,75
Denver ......... » •• •
296.48
,# _____ * * +
*
30,706,70
New Orleans....... *...........
626.536.30 .
_________. ~
8.799.46
Seattle....................... *
!!$6,608,394.44 $398,009.75 $2,761,090.11
Total for week ended August 14,
. . .

GOLD RECEIVED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND THE TREASURER*^ OFFICE:
(Under Secretary1s Order of December 28, 1933)
Received by Federal Reserve Banks:
Week ended August 12....... •••*
Received previously*..... ...... .
Total to August 12.... .
Received by Treasurers Office:
Week ended August 12..... .
Received previously.
Total to August 12....... .
NOTE;

Cold Coin
13,439,60
31.685.626.02
$31,699,065.62

$

$

$

2 6 8 .6 5 6 .0Ò
2 6 8 ,6 5 6 .0 0

Gold bars deposited with the New York Assay Office
in the amount of $200,572.69 previously reported.

$

6,900.00
P.,490.020.00
2,496,920.00

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Monday, August 17, 1936«

Press Service
o* 8-15

Net market purchases of (Government securities for Treasury investment
accounts for the calendar month of July, 1936, amounted to $15,466,700,
it was announced today.
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,

Press Servi cello. 8-14

8 /1 4 /3 6 .
The following Treasury Decision has been approved:

-L

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Fashington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Friday, August 14, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-14

The following Treasury Decision has heen approved;
COUNTERVAILING DUTIES —

GERMAN PRODUCTS

Treasury Decision 48360, as amend.ed by Treasury Decision 48444 and
modified hy Treasury Decision 48463, not applicable to certain im­
portations of the several classes of commodities listed therein.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT,
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,
WASHINGTON, D. C.
TO COLLECTORS OF CUSTOMS AMD OTHERS CONCERNED;
The Department is in receipt of official advice to the effect
that, with respect to any dutiable merchandise which will be or
has been exported directly or indirectly from Germany pursuant to
agreements entered into after August 2, 1936, the German Government
nas tak en measures to insure that no scrip or bond procedure was or
will be allowed, no public or private bounty or subsidy was or will
be paid, and that the use of no German currency other than free gold
exchange marks or free inland marks was or will be permitted.
In view of the foregoing, the provisions of Treasury Decision
48360, as amended by Treasury Decision 48444 and modified by Treasury
Decision 484o3, shall not apply to direct or indirect imports from
Germany of the commodities listed therein if the collector of customs
concerned sha,ll be satisfied by documentary evidence that the contract
of purchase or other agreement pursuant to which they were exported
from Germany was entered into after August 2, 1936, or, in the cases
of cameras, calf and kid leather, and surgical instruments, after
July 25, 1936.
/s/
FRANK DOF
Acting Commissioner of Customs.
APPROVED;
/s/ JOSEPHINE ROCHE
Acting Secretary of the Treasury.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
1ASHTNGT0N
FOR RELEASE, MOREIEG OTSPAPIRS,
¡bttfidaau
18/17/36

Press Service

.jgafij________

Acting Secretary of the Treasury Taylor announced la s t
evening that tbs tenders for 150,000,000* or thereabouts,
o f 273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated August 19, 1936, and matur­
ing May 19, 1937, which were cf fered on August 14, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 17.
The to ta l amount applied for was |1 8 2 ,740,000, of which
150,064,000 was accepted.

The accepted b ids ranged in price

from 99.866, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.177 percent per
aimum, to 99.850, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.198 percent
per annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only part of th e amount

bid fo r a t the la t t e r price was accepted.

The average price

of Treasury b i l l s to be issued i s 99.853 and th e average rate
i s about 0.194 percent per annus on a bank discount b a sis.

- 3 -

$2>S72>000, showed decreases in the four and twelve month periods of $2,301,000
and $1 ,771 ,000, respectively*
m

percentage of loans and discounts to total deposits on June 30,
was

29.61 ,

in comparison with

29.89

on March k 9

1936,

and

32.71

e

on June

1936,
29, 1935.

-

2

-

The total assets on June 30, 1936, were $29*702,839*000, showing increases
in the four and twelve month periods of $1,U09>820,000 and $ 3 >61+1,77 *+,000,
respectively.
Loans and discounts aggregating $7 >759>1^9>000 showed an increase of
$328,285*000 since March, and an increase of $393*923*000 in the year.
Investments in United States Government obligations direct and fully guaran­
teed were $8,1^+7,361+,000, in comparison with $7*785*979*000 on March 1+, 19 3 6 ,
and $7,173*007,000 on June 29, 1935*

Investments in such obligations at the date

of the recent call comprised direct obligations of the United States Government
of $7*072,979*000, obligations of the Beconstruction Finance Corporation of

c

$17^,9^,000, Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation bonds of $336,258,000 and Home
Owners’ Loan Corporation bonds of $863*183*000.

Other bonds and securities held

totaling $U,0 35 >26l ,000 showed increases in the four and twelve month periods of
$ 2 3 2 ,22^,000 and $1+9 1 ,882 ,000 , respectively.
Balances with other banks and cash items in process of collection of
$7>857>233>000, including reserve with Federal reserve banks of $3*520,901,000,
increased $120,1^0,000 and $1,39^>525>000 over the amounts reported as of March
1936, and June 29* 1935* respectively.

Cash in vault of $531*69^*000 in­

creased $62,652,000 since March and $126,181,000 in the year.
The book value of capital stock of the active banks on June 30, 19 3 6 , totale
$1,691,375>000, representing a par value of $1,698,251,000.

The latter figure

consisted of Class A preferred stock of $1+23*228,000, Class B preferred stock of
$20,261,000, and common stock of $1,25^,762,000.

Surplus funds of $973,393,000,

undivided profits of $3 ^ 6 »0 39 >000 , reserves for contingencies of $ll+7 >2 1 9 *000,
and preferred stock retirement fund of $ 7 *70 2 ,000 , a total of $1 ,^7 ^,3 5 3 ,000, itr
creased $9^*38^,000 since March and $197,^38,000 in the year.
Bills payable of $2,1+25,000 and rediscounts of $1+1+7,000, a total of

Comptroller of the Currency J. F. T. 0*Connor announced today that the total
deposits of the 5,37** active national hanks in the continental United States,
Alaska, Hawaii and the Virgin Islands of the United States on June 30, 1936, the
date of the last call made for statements of condition, aggregated $26,200,*4-53,000
which is a new high record for national hanks, exceeding hy $1,3*40,998,000, or
5*39 percent, the amount reported as of March *4-, 1936, the date of the previous
high record in deposits of national hanks since the establishment of the system*
The current figures show also that deposits increased $3,682,207,000, or 16*35
percent, over the amount reported as of June 29, 1935» ^he date of the correspond-l
ing call a year ago.
The total deposits on June 30, 1936» consisted of demand and time deposits
of individuals, partnerships, and corporations amounting to $1 1 ,665 *872,000 and
$7»07*J-,5**U*000, respectively, United States Government deposits of $692,527*000,
State, county and municipal deposits of $2,108,*4-86,000, postal savings of
$1 3 7 *376,000 and deposits of other hanks, including certified and cashiers'
checks outstanding, of $**,521,6*18,000.

The time deposits of individuals, partner-|

ships, and corporations include time certificates of deposit of $ 6 6 7 *621,000 and
deposits evidenced hy savings pass hooks of $ 6 ,0 67 *70 ^* 000 , the latter amount
representing 15*101 ,*4-86 accounts.

Postal savings in national hanks on June 30»

1936, showed a decrease of $12,873*000, or 8*57 percent, since March, and a de­
crease of $105,**58 ,000, or **3.**3 percent, since June of last year.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Friday. August 21. 1926.________
8-18-36

Press Service
No. 8-1?

Comptroller of the Currency J.F.T, O ’Connor announced today that the total
deposits of the 5,374 active national "banks in the continental United States,
Alaska, Hawaii and the Virgin Islands of the United States on June 30, 1936, the
date of the last call made for statements of conditien, aggregated $26,200,453,000,
which is a new high record for national "banks, exceeding "by $1,340,998,000, or
5.39 percent, the amount reported as of March 4, 1936, the date of the previous,
high record in deposits of'national "banks since the establishment of the system.
The current figures show

also that deposits increased $3,682,207,000, or 16.35

percent, over the amount reported as of June 29, 1935, the date of the correspond­
ing call a year ago.
The total deposits on June 30, 1936, consisted of demand and time deposits of
individuals, partnerships, and corporations amounting to $11,665,872,000 and
$7,074,544,000, respectively, United States Government deposits of $692,527,000,
State, county and municipal deposits of $2,108,486,000, postal savings of
$137,376,000 and deposits of other "banks, including certified and cashiers’ checks
outstanding of $4,521,648,000.

The time deposits of individuals, partnerships,

and corporations include time certificates of deposit of $667,621,000 and deposits
evidenced by savings pass books of $6,067,704,000,
15,101,486 accounts.

the latter amount representing

Postal savings in national banks on June 30, 1936, showed a

decrease of $12,873,000, or 8.57 percent, since March, and a decrease of
$105,458,000, or 43.43 percent, since June of last year.
The total assets on June 30, 1936, were $29,702,839,000, showing increases
ln the four 321(1 tw©lve month periods of $1,409,820,000 and $3,641,774,000,
respectively.

~2~
Loans and discounts aggregating $7,759,149,000 showed an increase of
$328,285,000 since March, and an increase of $393,923,000 in the year#
Investments in United States Government obligations direct and fully guaran­
teed were $8,447,364,000, in comparison with $7,785,979,000 on March 4, 1936, and
$7,173,007,000 on June 29, 1935*

Investments in such obligations at the date of

the recent call comprised direct obligations of the United States Government of
$7,072,979,000, obligations of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation of
$174,944,000, Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation bonds of $336,258,000 and Home
Owners* Loan Corporation bonds of $863,183,000*

Other bonds and securities held

totaling $4,035,261,000 showed increases in the four and twelve month periods of
$232,224,000 and $491,882^000, respectively.
Balances with other banks and cash items in process of collection of
$7,857,233,000, including reserve with Federal. Reserve banks of $3,520,901,000,
increased

$120,140,000 and $1,394,525,000 over the amounts reported as of March

4, 1936, and June 29, 1935, respectively.

Cash in vault of $531,694,000 increased

$62,652,000 since March and $126,181,000 in the year.
The book value of capital stock of the active banks on June 30, 1936, totaled
$1,691,375,000, representing a par value of $1,698,251,000*

The latter figure

consisted of Class A preferred stock of $423,228,000, Class B preferred stock of
$20,261,000, and common stock of $1,254,762,000*

Surplus funds of $973,393,000,

undivided profits of $346,039,000, reserves for contingencies of $147,219,000,
and preferred stock retirement fund of $7,702,000, a total of $1,474,353,000,
increased $94,384,000 since March and $197,438,000 in the year#
Bills payable of $2,425,000 and rediscounts of $447,000, a total of
$2,872,000, showed decreases in the four and twelve month periods of $2,301,000
and $1,771,000, respectively.
The percentage of loans and discounts to total deposits on June 30, 1936,
was 29.61, in comparison with 29*89 on March 4, 1936, and 32.71 on June 29, 1935*
ooOoo

â
entrances

WT7MBER OF VESSELS

per cent of
Flnereaseoi

►Net ToTMispe of vessels
Direct from Foreign Ports
Foreign vessels
Domestic vessels
Total
Via Other Domestic Ports with
Residue Cargo to Unlade
Foreign vessels
Domestic vessels
Total
Via Other Domestic Ports to Lade
Foreign vessels
Domestic vessels
Total

17,549
12 087
29^636

16.391
12.547
28,938

:1935-6—

42,328,963
40,585,576 7#1
4«!
21.022,889
21.860.806 —5«?-63,351,85262,446,382
2.4
1,

7,297

6,905

15,427,545
10.014,470
25,442,015

5,419
2,633
8,052

5,283
2,642
7,925

16,975,539
9.192.955
26,168,494

4,180

3,776

6,708,180

13,786,104 13,3
10.615.098 -5,Q_
24,401,202 5.7

16,416,341 2,6
9 t156.596 » .4.
25,572,937 1.6

5,669,3*^5 10.7

.gII g

6,055

5,931

21,724,480

21,624,815

-4.

12.992 13.557
Total Entrances
Foreign vessels
Domestic vessels
Total

Not.:

27,531
40.681
68,212

A minus sign (-) denotes decrease.

25,702
41.350
67,032

2.1

74,732,047
94.721.660

70,788,021

7,1

q^QR.088

-1.6-

,

18

— -

/

Le increased number and net tonnage of foreign vessels enterin,
firect from foreign ports more than offset a decline both in number
1

jj?'

-

aid in net tonnage of domestic vessels so entered*

*rhe rn^lber o: foreign

vessels was 711 per cent and the net tonnage 4*3 per epht greater during

A
1936\than
during the preceding riscal year.

/

Before proceeding on their homeward voyagey^vessels engaged ii forj*
go to some other port than

eign trade

port of first arrivali

either to lade e^rgo destined for abroad* or to discharge the balance^
of their ineorn ing o$rgo.

xhe numbfr of vessels proceeding to other

j

ports both to lade cargKnnd to discharge residue cargo was greater during
the fiscal year 1936 than

ig the previous fiscal year*

such vejss<

are, of course, already ii^ludeaNfith those entering direct from fo^eigb

I

l

/
ports and their number afind tonnage iKsignifieent only as an evidence of
\

the activity of foreign trade.
jroreign vesseli are excluded from carryin^nargoes between ports in
/
\
\ !
the united states and its possessions*

\

/

vessels enteHojg from inter.

cbastal port* and from noncontiguous territory and those carrying bond^
e|& cargoes/coastwise, are therefore, exclusively domestic ves^ls.
I

/

\

Substantial increases appeared in the number and tonnage of vessels

'iDtWT'lWlWwltwl*ijlOWt.S

entered from noncontiguous t

il i J n

coastwise ports declined.
A detailed statement of the number of entrances of vessels for each
of the past two fiscal years and of the increases or decreases in their
net tonnage follows:
>
—2'

The number of vessels entering through the various eustom
houses of the united States aggregated 6s,212 during the fiseal
year of 1936, an Increase of 1*8 per cent over the total for
the preceding fiscal year 167,033),

^

today*
ihe term «entering»* is used by customs officials in a -rnai
?***$ technical sense and refers to the filing of certain specific
documents with the collector of customs within a short time after
the arrival of the vessel at a port*

All vessels, whether of

foreign or domestic registry, arriving in this country direct
from foreign ports are required

to

make entry at a customhouse*

In addition, all foreign vessels plying between American ports
for the purpose either of securing further cargo or of unlading
residue cargo, are required to make entry at each port of call.
American vessels, if registered

foreign trade, or if they

carry any foreign cargo in bond, are likewise required to make
entry at each port of call*
j^LJkotal ^timber of vessels entering direct from foreign
porjfcs during the

ear was 29,636, an increase o

2 *4 per cent over the number of such vesselsfiscal year*

The net

these vessels showed an
previous^year,^ from 62,446,382 during 1935,
..

?«8rir63rfSgTSi6.

CUSTOMS TRANSACTIONS

"

Fiscal years 1935 and 1936

:
Number of Entries
Free consumption entries
Dutiable consumption entries
Warehouse and rewarehouse entries
Mail, baggage and other entries

1935

î

: % of Increase

1936

164,662
284,403
05,765
1,888,219

183,418
324,013
68,929
2,136,594

11.4
13.9
23.6
13.2

2,393,049

2,712,954

13.4

(1 »789 ,153,000

$2,205,911,000

23,3

Number of vessels entering the
United States direct from
foreign ports

28,524

29,600

3.8

Number of automobiles entering
the United States

9,122,672

9,807,700

7,5

41,730,336

44,307,496

6.2

$344,941,758
1,563,561

$886,941,340
1,832,188

12,2
17.2

17.932,364

231021.537

28.4

1364,437,683

f411,795,065

13.0

3,189,818

11.1

$2,413,183,000

13,8

Total entries
value of imports

Humber of persons entering
the United States
Collections by Customs officers
Duties
Other Customs collections
Collections for other
AAVA^rnnAnt.ftl agencies
Total collections
Number of export declarations
Value of exports

2,871,380
$2,120,857,000

2

the total of $2,413,183,000, exceeding that of the fiscal year
1935 hy 13*8 per cent.
The following table presents a statement of the important
customs transactions for the past two fiscal years, together
with percentages of increase:

&

St***“

f

isiness transacted "by tlie Customs Service during tlie
fiscal year 1936 showed a marked increase over that of the previous
fiscal year, it was announced "by the Bureau of Customs today.
The number of entries for the past fiscal year aggregated
2,712,954, wht«teHbs an increase of 13.4 per cent over the fiscal
year 1935.

Of this total there were 324,013 dutiable consumption

entries and 68,929 warehouse entries, representing increases of
13.9 per dent and 23.6 per cent, respectively.

th e a a m h e r ^ ... .

ii

■ e ... ... ......

r^TWlTilv ini Mi

2ko

increase-*»

iiirn-n

i

,^0^900 Vessels entered the(United states direct from foreign
re­
ports , as conpared with 28,524 a year ago, wkrctaie an increase of
3,8 per cent.

There was an increase of 7.5 per cent in the number

of automobiles entering the United States and an increase of 6.2
per cent in the number of persons crossing the borders.
Total collections by Customs during the fiscal year 1936
aggregated $411,795,065, an increase of 13 per cent over total
.collections for last fiscal year.

Of this amount $386,941,340

represented duties collected on imports, which is an increase of
12.2 per cent over the duties collected during the fiscal year 1935.
During the fiscal year 1 9 3 6 ^ , 1 8 9 ,818?export declarations**»*
an increase of 11.1 per cent over the number of export declara­
tions filed the preceding

year, while the value of exports reached

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

m

RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
'Thursday. August 20, 1936.______

Press Service
No# 8-18

8-18-36.
Business transacted by the Customs Service during the fiscal year 1936 showed
a marked increase over that of the previous fiscal year, it was announced by the
Bureau of Customs today.
The number of entries for the past fiscal year aggregated 2,713,954, an increase
of 13.4 per cent over the fiscal year 1935.

Of this total there were 324,013

dutiable consumption entries and 68,929 warehouse entries, representing increases of
13.9 per cent and 23.6 per cent, respectively.
Vessels numbering 29,600 entered the United States direct from foreign ports,
as compared with 28,524 a year ago, an increase of 3.8 per cent.

There was an

increase of 7.5 per cent in the number of automobiles entering the United.States and
an increase of 6.2 per cent in the number of persons crossing the borders.
Total collections by Customs during the fiscal year 1936 aggregated
$411,795,065, an increase of 13 per cent over total collections for last fiscal year.
Of this amount $386,941,340 represented duties collected on imports, which is an
increase of 12.2 per cent over the duties collected during the fiscal year 1935.
During the fiscal year 1936 there were filed 3,189,818 export declarations,
l
an increase of 11.1 per cent over the number of export declarations filed the
preceding year, while the value of exports reached the total of $2,413,183,000,
exceeding that of the fiscal year 1935 by 13.8 per cent.
The following table presents a statement of the important customs transactions
for the past two fiscal years, together with percentages of increase:

CUSTOMS TRANSACTIONS
Fiscal years 1935 and 1936

1935
Number of Entries
Free consumption entries
Dutiable consumption entries
Warehouse and rewarehouse entries
Mail, baggage and other entries
Total entries
Value of imports
Number of vessels entering
the United States direct from
foreign ports
Number of automobiles entering
the United States
Number of persons entering
the United States
Collections by Customs officers
Duties
Other Customs collections
Collections for other
Governmental agencies
Total collections
Number of export declarations
Value of exports

1936

$ of increase

164,662
284,403
55,765
1,888,219

183,418
324,013
68,929
2,136,594

11.4
13.9
2S.6
13.2

2,393,049

2,712,954

13.4

52*205,911,000

23.3

$1,789,153,000

28,524

29,600

3.8

9,122,672

9,807,700

7.5

41,730,336

44,307,496

6.2

$344,941,758 $386,941,340
1,563,561
1,832,188
17.932.364
23,021.537

12.2
17.2
28.4

$364,437,683 $411,795,065

13.0

2,871,380

3,189,818

$2,120,857,000 '52,413,183., 000

11.1
13.8

>3The number of vessels entering through the various Custom houses of the
United States aggregated 68,212 during the fiscal year of 1936, an increase of 1.8
per cent over the total for the preceding fiscal year (67,032). today.
The term ’’entering*1 is used by Customs officials in a technical sense and
refers to the filing of oertain specific documents with the Collector of Customs
within a short time after the arrival of the vessel at a port.

All vessels, whether

of foreign or domestic registry, arriving in this country direct from foreign ports
are required to make entry at a Custom House.

In addition, all foreign vessels

plying between American ports for the purpose either of securing further cargo or
of unlading

residue cargo, are required to make entry at each port of call.

American vessels, if registered for foreign trade, or if they carry any.foreign
cargo in bond, are likewise required to make entry at each port of call.
A detailed statement of the number of entrances of vessels for each of the
past two fiscal years and of the increases or decreases in their net tonnage
follows S
ENTRANCES
NUMBER OE VESSELS
Per cent
of Increase
Number_________ Net Tonnage of Vessels
1935-6.
1936
: 1935
:
1936
1935
;
! No. Tamase
Direct from Foreign Portis
Foreign vessels
17,549
Domestic vessels
12.087
Total
29,636
Via Other Domestic Ports with
„Residue Cargo to Unlade
Foreign vessels
4,563
Domestic vessels
2.734
Total
7,297
Via Other Domestic Ports to
„.Lade
Foreign vessels
5,419
Domestic vessels
2.633
Total
8,052
From Noncontiguous Territory
Domestic vessels only
4,180
|rpm Intercoastal Ports
Domestic vessels only
6,055
From Coastwise Ports
Domestic vessels only
12.992
Total entrances
Foreign vessels
27,531
Domestic vessels
40.681
. .Total.
, v
68.212
minus sign (— ) denotes decrease.

16,391
12.547
28,938

42,328,963
21.022.889
63,351,852

40,585,576 7.1 4,3
21.860.806 -3.7 -3.8
62,446,382 2.4 1.4

4,028
2.877
6,905

15,427,545
10.014.470
25,442,015

13,786,104 13.3 11.9
10.615.098 -5.0 -5.7 *
24,401,202 5.7 4.3

5,283
2.642
7,925

16,975,539
9.192.955
26,168,494

16,416,341
9.156.596
25,572,937

3,776

6,708,180

5,931

21,724,480

21,624,815

13.557

26.058.686

26.468.398 -4.2 -1.6

25,702
41.330
67,032

74,732,047
94.721.660
169,453,707

2.6
-.4
1.6

3.4
.4
2.3

5,669,375 10.7 18.3
2.1

70,788,021 7.1
95.395*088 -1.6
166,183,109 1.8

.5

5.6
-.7
2.0

pÄPGRTS OF CA33TLE DIDDER QUOTA PROVISIONS OF THE
P AN AniAlá TRADE AGREEMENT

\

\

During the Period January 1 to August 8, 1956
(Preliminary Figures)

\

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

\

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

M

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

139,989
89 »9$

3,417
17 M

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Mas sachusett s
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total From Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico
(a)

26,936
3,482
21,771
231
67
562
—
6,565
38,019
906
1,328
3,025
22
386
290
16 ,539

— - * - 10
- » 686
- - 38
------- - -/
31
• - - - «*»««<*•
- 298
2,015
339

120,129

3,417

7,151
§,950
5,702
57
1 9 ,860____________

—
—

—
—

-

~

Reports from the Collectors of Customs show that the quota on this
class of cattle has been filled.

(Prepared by ^vision o f V t a t i s t i c s ^ d Research, Bureau of Customs)

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures
for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian
Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to August 8, 1936, and the
percentage that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the
quota provisions, as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
for i m m e d i a t e r e l e a s e ,

Press Service
No. 8-19

Thursday, August 20, 1936

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the imports
of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period
January 1 to August 8, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the totals
allowable under the quota provisions, as follows!

______________________
TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)
(a)
_____________

Cattle 700
Pounds
or more
(Head)
139,989
89.9^

FROM CixlADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St, Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
POM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

26,936
3,482
21,771
231
67
562

- - 6,565
38,019
906
1,328
3,025
22
386
290
16,539
120,129

------ -

-----------

7,151
6,950
5,702
57
19,860

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
or more
(Head)
3,417
17.1*

M
10

M — _ ».
686

—

M ..
38

M
_ _ _ _
31

». —
/»»
298
2,015
339
3,417

M •• M M
^ _ —-r r „
** »*
m*

Ia) Reports from the Collectors of Customs
show that the quota on this class of
cattle has been filled.
ooOoo

Airplan© passenger traffic

between the United. States and. foreign couirbri

maintained its popularity during the 1936 fisoal year, with a total of 27,584
passengers arriving from abroad by this method* This number was an inorease of
231 passengers over the total of the 1935 fisoal year, the

Bureau of Customs

announced*
Prior to 1935 the largest number of passengers arriving from foreign
lands by plane m s

in 1931 when 20,907 passengers arrived.
<4n the

4SBSSa^9^!
8S'aS?
dustoms "district, which clears Cuban and British possessioi§,trafficpjjwith

\

ij

• '

^

\|

tjhe exception of Bermuda*
Passefobgers arriving in thest district adjacent to tt^^^iadian border
umbered 5,131 d u r i n^the 1936 fiscal year, as c o m p a ^ f w i t h 4,244 in the prlioi?
jwelve month period^
a ir
.
1
Fewer/pas senger s arrived alorj||^C^f| Mexican border with a total of ^,4/8
the 1936 fiscal year as comp;
There were 4

with 6,492
bringing passengers

©ceding 12 month peijiodi
United States

•o^abroad in 1936 a^compared with 5,037 planes in the 1935 fiscal year# M P

!

\

X

it 1934 land 7,300 in 1930*
1

1

I

f

1930 the p l a n e s - : ® t v e r a g e of three passsagass.*-^,Jp36;

The number of planes and passengers arriving by plane in each customs
district from 1930 to 1936,followsj

dumber of Airplanes and Passenger Entries at the Various
Border Districts: Fiscal Years 1930—1936 inclusive»

Customs District

1930

Airplanes
1932
1931

Maine
Vermont
St» Lawrence
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Philadelphia
New York
Rochester
Buffalo
Ohio
Michigan
Chicago
Duluth
Dakota
Montana
Oregon
Washington
Northern Border
San Francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
Southern Border
Alaska
Puerto Rico
Florida

67
35
16
—
433
310
28
349
100
21
674
2033

51
106
68
404
349
18
430
—
244
58
648
2376

46
1498
161
267
874
2846
64
285
2122

1052
99
318
851
2320
78
352
1682

1763
35
119
512
2429
61
154
1319

Other Districts

2471

2012
6708

1534
5913

(1)134
19
14

(1)102
158
111

Maine
Vermont
Ê>t. Lawrence
Massachusetts
fîonnecticut
^hiladelphia
New York
floches ter
Buffalo
èhio
Michigan
Chicago
Duluth
Dakota
Montana
Oregon
Washington
Northern B<
San Francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
1er
Southern B
Alaska
Puerto Rico
Florida
Other District!

(l) Estimated

552

483
—

367
84
283

517
44
259

1933

1934

1935

1936

22
55
78
8
—
—
396
240
20
150
1
6
409
8
—
324
1717
1130
39
130
436

24
208
29
7
—
—
321
—
155
13
76

35
156
29
16
~
3
295

1735
49
248
1300

48
148
52
—
2
—
380
1
171
18
117
—
3
338
9
1
139
1427
53
636
216
195
472
1572
114
225
1234

2
537
21
—
477
1870
1
259
395
129
197
444
1425
219
222
1301

1597
5049

1573
4572

1742
5037

Passengers
28
207
121
104
124
155

77
275
94

66
60
82
4
—
341
172
16
376
—
18
429
14
—
372
1950
«

539
—
215
57
201
—

_

158
48

373
151
—

2019

1558

29
650
46
—
697

776
—
274
13
168
—
9
790
19
—
520

754
—
192
19
132
—
4
637
233
—
2Q0

185
19
96
••
17
399
9
773
2032
156
274
28
82
435
975
354
246
1227
1827

832

132
1081

1632

2061_
5131

208
4814
260
430
3666
9378
63
927
5415

3595
.18
670
3565
7848
133
1160
8010

4690
73
326
2359
7448
67
658
7872

2597
;90
374
2823
5884
52
1049
10019

108
1297
607
755
3083
5850
150
1105
11217
12472

4.
823
941
276
640
3811
6492
457
1359
15802

649
578
66
307
2878
4478
894
1474
IboUo
tB q o A

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, AFTERNOON NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday, August 22, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-20

Airplane passenger traffic between the United States and foreign
countries maintained its popularity during the 1936 fiscal year, with a
total of 28,585 passengers arriving from abroad by this method.

This

number was an increase of 231 passengers over the total of the 1935 fiscal
year, the Bureau of Customs announced.
Prior to 1935 the largest number of passengers arriving from foreign
lands by plane was in 1931 when 20,907 passengers arrived.
The number of planes and passengers arriving by plane in each Customs
district from 1930 to 1936 follows:

►p- a» ]
-a
*o ¡
iP »p

>3
r^

j

/&?$>* <*V>

ï

/

/

/

S § l i M l É S ¡ ;É

'/>¿°7 (>,/ Q® JU JU £C>8c>

/a o u

u

^
“w;

ÀIA
I

O** { T e r r i l

J f f

'/%?/'c &TT*i

S/^3

28V u ¿U p

f#

A t\

I "

*■*/ I

¿L ?J. ^ J J^s.. 3 2 8~ \

3,V9.

t}L3ÜA\AU2AA2Í8.

1

L i s'

1

"I

2
M
.
W P 1
/ 7 fU

*HKL

0.0^1

J

'S i ^ i

L

J

l

€¿¿Á£
.L...

/y3 V o

/, 3VÙ

/ j /

/3

A ll

2 J J l7 ± lÿ J 7 S

2~ù

#£¿1
U

j

2a JL à Z Ì £ £ ^

L

)
kjL&M.

'~t— .*

3, (ù U

lâ °

_J1

i
Number of Airplanes and Passenger Entries at the various
Border Districts: Fiscal Years 1930-1936 inclusive*

Customs District
Maine
Vermont
St* Lawrence
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Philadelphia
New York
Rochester
Buffalo
Ohio
Michigan
Chicago
Duluth
Dakota
Montana
Oregon
\
Washington
Northern B< •der
San francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
Southern B< ►der
Alaska
Puerto Rico
Florida
ricts

Maine
Vermont
St« Lawrence
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Philadelphia
New York
Rochester
.buffalo
Ohio
Michigan
Chicago
Duluth
Dakota
Montana
Oregon
W a & ington
„_
Northern Border
San Francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
____
Southern Border
Alaska
Puerto Rico
Florida
Other Districts
(1) Estimated

1930

Airplanes,
1931
1®32

m
m
404

1933

1934

%

1935

me

1936

m■
31
2951
•■
185 I

2
•
380
1
171
18
117
•
3
338
9
1
139
1427
me

99
318
851

me
341
me
172
16
376
me
18
429
14
m
572
1950
•
•
1763
35
119
512

me
•
396
<»
240
20
150
1
6
409
8
«*
324
1717
•
••
1130
39
130
436

64
285
2122

78
352
1682

61
2)\ 154
1319

49
248
1300

114
225
1234

219
222
1301

354J
246 §
12271

2471

2012

1534

1597

1573

1742

18271

m
433
310
28
349
m
100
21
m
674
¿0¿3
m
46
1498
lòl
267
874

(1)134
19
14
M
m
552
me
367
84
$283
m
m
158
48
2019

349
18
430
me
m
244
58
648
2376
m
m

ioor >

(l)102Pa8SenW
104
158
155
111
•
•
«e
•
«
•
539
483
m
215
517
57
44
201
259
m
m
29
650
373
46
151
1558

■3B7ST

208
4814
260
430
3666

S T
927
5415
-m r

imr

133
1160
8010
9303
20907

697
2900

4690
73
326
251
7448
67
658
7872
8597
L8945

28
121
124
1
«•
«
776

»,
638^
216
195
472

77
275
94
•
754

520
2843

192
19
132
me
4
637 *
283
m
200
2407

2597
90
374

108
1297
607
755

274
13
168
me
790
19

5884
52
1049
10019,
11120-

5850
150
1105
11217

12ÍZ2—

•
321
•
155
13
76
•
2
537
21
me
477
1870
1
259
395
129
197
444

49
454
55
11
me
•
83 2
131
10
78
me
4
943
45
ma
1632
4244

191
96 I
m■
17 1
3991
9I
m■
773§
20321
1561
2741
281
82 I
4361

132!
1081

jQfil
513L

649
578
66

307

mt.
457
1359

15222.

um.

894
1474

9
by

the

shows

Utx.
1
►x
" X
>S, / ^
accompanying
T h e £a£32535te* t a b l e ,

pxsgxx

Treasury D e p a r t m e n t s

D i v i s i o n of R e s e a r c h

the

status

originating
a g e n c i e s ^ during

0 ~ oi J

of E X X E X X x h z x x i H ®

criminal

the

June

six m o n t h s

ended

e».!" uTTOiiu u tl,,'wS5fc
is a l s o e n g a g e d in l a w
w i t h t h e T r e a s u r y and

enforcement
other

teE±n^x±H®i®ii:stxKH]iErx±iiac
the

Coast

are not

other Treasury

30,

shown

of Treasury

1936.

^ T » A i np_fe
otioriLnsdi^^
.j isirftrs
Guard,/

activities,

government

a n d Statisti

cases,

operations

rrf t h o u g h jbhe U n i t e d S t a t e s

included with

a n a l y s i s prepared

from law enforcement

’■
___
R

^

inss

from an

agencie s ^

in co-operatio
J.ts cases

separately but

cases u n d e r the

i».w

are

r e s p e c t i v e he

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
EOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
■Sunday, August 23. 1936.
8-21-36.

Press Service
No. R-P1

The accompanying table, from an analysis prepared by the Treasury
Department’s Division of Research and Statistics, shows the status of criminal
cases, originating from law enforcement operations of Treasury agencies during
the six months ended June 30, 1936.
The United States Coast Guard is also engaged in law enforcement acti­
vities, in cooperation with the Treasury and other government agencies.

Its

cases are not shown separately but are included with the other Treasury cases
under the respective headings.

Alcohol
Tax
Unit

Customs

18*033

393

3,039

1,340

„431

22,942

18,329

480

3,493

1,346

139

23,787

11,407

288

1,550

1,087

43

14,375

6*160

186

1*193

826

13

8,378

4*677

69

372

544

27

5,489

. 3,080

98

325

304

10

3,818

1, 755,600

54,126

745,625

555,072

4 ,407

3, 114,830

285

291

625

672

339

372

$1,738,769

$48,851

$60,328

Nev? Cases
Cases Closed
Total Convicted
Number Imprisoned
Number Pined
Number placed op
Probation
Total Number Days
Imprisown ent
Average Number
Days Imprisonment
Total Pines

Average Fines in Dol­
lars
Cases Pending

Narcotics

372

708

174

17,677

480

2,004

ooOoo

Secret
Service

internal
Revenue

Total

$97,624 $42,,024 $1, 987,596
235

1, 556

359

1,163

386

21,710

Cooperative action taken by other governments generally prohibits the
exportation of alcohol except under landing certificate and requires a bond
to bo posted.

This bond is forfeited to the government unless the exporter

within a reasonable timo presents authenticated customs documents to prove the
alcohol was actually and lawfully entered into the port of a foreign country.

--OOO--

TREASURY DEPARHIE NT
Washington
Press Service
No. 8-22

FOR RELEASE MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Sunday August 23_, 19_36^._____
8722736'

With only one suspected alcohol carrier reported off the Atlantic seaboard
by the United States Coast Guard in the past six weeks, Treasury officials today
expressed themselves as highly pleased over the cooperation of foreign governments
in their efforts to halt the smuggling of contraband alcohol into this country.
The latest European government to assist the United States in its war on
smuggled spirits is Belgium, which on August 1 enforced new regulations regarding
the exportation of alcohol.
Action by the'Belgian government brings to five the number of nations
which have taken action to prevent the smuggling of alcohol into the United States^
Other nations cooperating with this government in this respect include Cubaj
France (St. Piorre), Mexico and Great Britain’s colonies in the western hemisphe re•
The Belgian government took action when it was shown that several ships of
foreign registry had landed, or attempted to land, contraband alcohol on American
shores after obtaining their cargoes at Antwerp.
In order to obtain a refund of the high excise duties which are otherwise
payable, alcohol intended for export from Belgium must be shipped on vessels
belonging to regular steamship lines sailing from a Belgian port, or on vessels
having a minimum tonnage of 3,000 and transporting at the same time other mer­
chandise of an amount equal in quantity to the gross weight of the alcohol taken
on board*

Furthermore, the alcohol must be shipped in metal casks of a capacity

of not loss than 100 liters each.

This latter provision is designed to make

more difficult the transshipment of alcohol at sea.

2-alcohol
n y■

3,000

b^ggg, and transporting at the same timqg^ther

an amount equal in quantity to the gross weight of the alcohol taken on board.
Furthermore,the alcohol must be shipped in metal casks of a capacity of not less
than 100 liters each. This latter provision is designed to make more difficult
the transshipment of alcohol at sea.
The & St.Pierre executive decree prohibits the exportation of alcohol
except under landing certificate, and a bond of approximately |5 per gallon must be
posted. This bon^, if forfeited to the government unless the exporter within a
reasonable time presents authenticated customs documents to prove the alcohol
ms

actually and lawfully entered tnto the port of a fireiga country.
The Mexican agreement is similar to the St .Pierre decree, except

that thj

bond is somewhat lower. The “landing certificate" principle is also the basis for
the agreements of the other governments,with the exception of Cuba.
The Cuban executive decree prohibits the exportation of alcohol from
Cuba in any vessel except a common carrier on a regularly scheduled itinerary. It i
also prohibits the exportation of alcohol to any destination which the government
my

is a point of concentration from which

---- - r^wt- r h ° ™

the alcohol is iatarcon: scheduled to be smuggled into the United States at a laterj
time.
The Holland proposal contains the "landing certificate” principle/
-em-

y

(/

With only ono suspected alcohol carrier reported off the Atlantic
seaboard

by the United States Coast Guard^, in the past^si^weeks, Treasury

officials today expressed themselves as highly pleased over the cooperation
of foreign governments in their efforts to halt the smuggling of contraband
alcohol into this country«
The latest European government to assist the United States in its m s
on smuggled spirits is Belgium, which on Aug«,l enforced new regulations regarding
the exportation of alcohol«
Action by the Belgian government brings to fixe,the number of nations
which have argvTrod nnr^ rnVi nn to prevent the smuggling of alcohol into the
United States« A sixth, Hoi land, has assured Treasury and State Department officials
that it will take similar action early in September«
Other nations cooperating with this government in this respect include
C u b a , France

(St«Pierre), Mexico and

Great Britain *s colonies in the western

hemisphere«
The Belgian government took action when it m s shown that several ships
¡¡^ ¿¿Acontraband
foreign registry had ^ittte^or attempted to land
a l c o h o l 1a
cn
American shores, after obtaining their cargoes at Antwerp«

v

Qgg> of these ships transferred port of its^ar go, contained in -two xiter
c^ ‘m L » 9t o smaller vessels on the high seas, near the United States coast line;
another brought its cargoxi of Belgian alcohol in a ship especially fitted with
large tanks and attempted to rim its illicit cargo into the United States, by

j

means of an American tttankerM which took its cargo at seaJFKe’transporting ships
^
*ff~**~* J
Js

W 6re oop ied by the United Otatea

rn iP f~ -~ .*~™«****~

either apprehended^**

,

forced to

depart with the greater part of their cargoes st&ll on board«
In order to obtain a refund of the high excise duties which are otherwise
payable,alcohol intended for expert must be shipped on vessels belonging to regu
steamship lines sailing from a Belgian port,or on vessels having a minimum tonnage
m-o-r-e

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE MORNING- HEWS PAPERS
Sunday,- August 23, 1936.
8/22/3*6'
'

Press Service
No. 8-22

With only one suspected alcohol carrier reported off the Atlantic seaboard
by the United States Coast Guard in the past six weeks, Treasury officials today
expressed themselves as highly pleased over the cooperation of foreign governments
m

their efforts to halt the smuggling of contraband alcohol into this country.
The latest European government to assist the United States in its war on

smuggled spirits is Belgium, which on August 1 enforced new regulations regarding
the exportation of alcohol.
Action by the Belgian government brings to five the number of nations which
have taken action to prevent the smuggling of alcohol into the United S t a t e s . ) ^
six]

BMfmii rnurrn iiyiiwnitMwrinrirmr"

1*111111

ate Department officials thalTTr^ill

Other nations cooperating with this government in this respect include Cuba,
France (St. Pierre), Mexico and Great Britain's colonies in the western hemisphere.
The Belgian government took action when it was shown that several ships of
foreign registry had landed, or attempted to land, contraband alcohol on American
shores after obtaining their cargoes at Antwerp.
in sixga^on c a s e s / t S - l ^ ^

\

on the high seas, near the United S t a j g ^ o a s t

1y es an°ther brought its cargT'oi^^

lip especially fitted

Ifrge tanks and attempted to run its iWJ>tfifiic a r g ^
Of an American "tanker” w M g M f S S k its cargo at sea.

w$i

^United States, by mejans
riefan
In this casTthS
*0*1^

^

j

l f l o ^ g ^ h e n d e d by Customs officers or forced to depart with the

gre at e r part- e f •the in

.pyi

1

ng

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
hashington
MEMORANDUM EOR THE PRESS

August 24, 1936.

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21,1933) as amended
W eek ended August 21, 1936:
Philadelphia ......................
San Fra n c i s c o ......... ............
Denver
Total for week ended August 21, 1936 .
Total receipts through August 21, 1936

491,744.55
280,285.02
6.670.81
778,700.38
96,943,352.96

fino ounces
»
K

300.00
2,143.85
549.50
44,96

fine ounces
n
»

it

h

it

h

»

i<

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
W eek ended August 21, 1936:
P h i l a d e l p h i a .....................
New York
................ ......... ?
Sah F r a n c i s c o ....... .
Denver .............. *...... s
t......
New Orleans ..............-..... ***
Seattle
»*?• •
Total for week ended August 21, 1936
Total receipts through August 21, 1936

.
3,038.31
112,969,655.42

n

it

it

it

h

»

»
it

h

it

it

n

RECEIPTS OF COLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Week ended August 21, 1936:
Imports
Ph i l a d e l p h i a......... ..... . .. $
9,442.16
New Y o r k ......................
15,548,100.00
Sah Francisco ... ...... ......*
1,499,086.61
Denver
............ .......... *
7,315.14
New Orleans ................. ,
4,124.06
Seattle ..............«»*«...,..—
Total for week ended August 21 ...$17,068,067.97

Secondary
$ 100,815.77
4,555,217,00
23,053,02
17,201.29
21,790.15
9.098.98
$4,727,176.21

New
Domestic .
$
511.56
215,600.00
1,515,492.67
597,903.09

477.265.43
$2,806,772.75

GOLD RECEIVED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND THE TREASURER’S OFFICE:
(Under Secretaries Order of December 28, 1933)
Received by Federal Reserve Banks:
W eek ended August 19 .............
Received previously ..............
Total to August 19 ... *.... .

_____ Gold Coin— _
$
.7,561.92
31,699,065.62
$31,706,627,54

Received by Treasurer’s Office:
W eek ended August 19 ............ *
Received previously ..............
Total to August 19 j * * *v o ..... **

$ ~
~
.. .... 268,656.00
$
268,656.00

NOTE:

Gold bars deposited with the New York Assay Office
in the amount of $200,572,69previously reported,

Gold Certificates
$
254,950.00
110 T384.210.00_
$110,639,160.00

$
$

2 , 200.00
^496,920.00—
2,499,120.00

[

2 -

In order to obtain a refund of tho high excise duties which are otherwise
payable, alcohol intended, for export from Belgium must be shipped on vessels
belonging to regular steamship lines sailing from a Belgian port, or on vessels
having a minimum tonnage of 3,000 and transporting at the same time other mer­
chandise of an amount equal in quantity to the gross weight of* the alcohol taken
on board.

Furthermore, tho alcohol must be shipped in metal casks of a capacity

of not less than 100 liters each.
more difficult tho transshipment
Gjry'nCiimj i»

This latter provision is designed to make
of alcohol at sea
^ i b i 1 t the
h i exportation
of alcohol ex­
¿¿aq q 5
prohibit4
jexp€r

cept under landing co rti fi cate i’andkaoond
be posted*

1[R, l 'jr ^fii f 00M!P|IOiF,"gB*iWBl

This bond is forfeited to tho government unless the exporter

within a reasonable time prpsents

authenticated customs documents to prove the

alcohol was actually and lawfully entered into the port of a foreign country.

ove rrment s, w r

:ie agreements of tne

The Cuban executive decree prohibits t
fll
3ia
regularly
scheduled itinerary
in any ve^l?®1^ ^
car]
‘on cf alcohol to any destination which

also prohibits the expor
;uppo

.t of concentration from which the JwWxihol is schedule^

ingglod into the uni

oOo-

TRIAS!®! DSPARTKSRT
WASHISGTOH
Press Service

FOR RELEASE, M081HHG HffSPAPffiS,
Tuesday. Auaist "5f 1335.,--------8/24/36

Secretary of the Treasury Korgenthau announced last
evening that the t® d ers for #50,000,000, or thereabouts, of
273-day Treasury h i l l s , dated August 26, 1936, and maturing
May 26, 1937, which were offered on August 21, were opened at
the Federal Reserve banks on August 24.
fha to ta l amount applied for was fl97t603t000t of
which |50,046,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in

p rice from 99.876, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.164 per­
cent per annua, to 99.867, equivalent to a rate o f about
0.175 percent per annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only

part o f the amount bid fo r a t the la t t e r p rice was accepted.
The average price of Treasury b i l l s to be issued i s 99.871
and the average rate i s about 0.170 percent per annum on a
.
\
3 b a n k 'discount b a s is .

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday, August 25, 1936,

Press Service
No, 8-23

Q/2^/ZQ
Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated
August 26, 1936, and maturing May 26, 1937, which were offered on August 21,
were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 24,
The total amount applied for was $197,603,000, of vfhich $50,046,000 was
accepted*

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99,876, equivalent to a rate

of about 0,164 percent per annum, to 99,867, equivalent to a rate of about
0,175 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount

The average price of Treasury

bills to be issued is 99,871 ar^d the average rate is about 0,170 percent per
annum on a bank discount basis.

— oOo—

In response to numerous inquiries concerning the present
status of the suit filed by the Comptroller of the Currency and the
Receiver of the Harriman National Bank and Trust Company against
certain clearing house banks in New Y o r k , C o m p t r o l l e r of the
Currencysta?est that shortly after the decision was rendered by the
Supreme Court of the State of New York instructions were issued by
the Comptroller to New York counsel to take the necessary steps to
prosecute an appeal to the Appellate Division of the court«

O

The appeal can not be perfected until the entry of final
judgment and we understand that under the required procedure it is
necessary for counsel for the clearing house banks to submit formal
findings to the court preliminary to the entry of the judgment*

Our

counsel now report that these findings are being prepared by counsel
for the clearing house banks and that they will be presented to the
court when it reconvenes in September*

steps as much as possible in order that the questions involved may

0
be determined on appeal i

C-o >

PRESS HHJSASI

Jn reapona# to minerai» Inquisite® conce»ing thè preaent
(tatua of thè «Ut fllad by thè Conptrollar of thè Currenoy end th*
Recelver of thè Harrlman Hatlonal Bank end Truat Conpany
certain doari»« tema# bada la Ha* lork, thè Coaptroller of thè
Currenoy «tate» that shortly after thè deeialo» » • raodwed

by

thè

Supreae Court of thè State of Se» Tork inatructlona «ere laeued by
thè Comptroller to He» Tork eouaad to take thè neceaaary «top» to
proaeeute aa appeal to thè Appellai* Melalo» of th» eourt.
The apped eaa aot he perfeoted uatll thè eatcy of flaal
judgneat aad «e uaderataad that under thè roqulrod procedure lt le
neceaaary for counael for thè olearia« houae baake to «ubali formi
fladlaga to «»e eourt prdlaiaary to thè «atry of th» Judgaent.

Our

couaael ao. report that theae fladla«» are bel»« prepared by eou»«d
for thè doari»« houae banka

and that they «1U b» preaaated to thè

court when li reooaresei tn Septeaber.
«e bare requeated our attorney» to «jqpadite thè prooedural
gtepg M

Buch «a poaalble la order that thè quaationa laroleed aay

he detemlaed oc appeal et thè oarlieat date praotleable»

3.

T. T, O'OMBK».

Comptroller of ilio Currenoy #

press

m ju m

In response to nuneroue Inquiries concerning the preeeni
status of the salt filed h y the Comptroller of tbs Currency and the
Receiver of the Harrlaan Rational Bank and Trust Company against
certain clearing house banks in He* York, the Comptroller of tbs
Currency statos that shortly after the decision «as rendered by the
Supreme Court of the State of Sew fork instructions «ere issued
the Comptroller to Re« fork counsel to take the neeeesary steps to
prosecute en appeal to 'Use Appellate Division of the eourt»
The appeal can not be perfected until the entry of final
judgment and «e understand that under the required procedure It is
neeessaxy fer counsel for the clearing house banks to submit formal
findings to the court preliminary to the entry of the judgment.

Our

counsel no« report that those findings are being prepared by counsel
for the clearing house banks and that t o y «ill be presented to .the
court «hen It reconvenes in gepteriter*
fe have requested our attom^re to expedite the procedural
stops as such as possible in order that the questions involved say
be determined on appeal at the earliest date practicable.

y. r. T. 0*COR»Olt,
Comptroller of the Currency.

miss

m m

$i

In responso to atinerou« inquiariee eencerning thè pt«««wt
gtatu# of the suit ftlcd by thè ConptroUer of thè Currendf ^

**»

Eeeelver of thè Barrinan Hatianal Bank and Trust Coapany against
cartata clearing house beni* in Ho» Tori, th« Ccnptroller of tl»
C o n d o r st*te* timi shortly s f t » th« dolilo» «a» rendere* by th«
Sapide Court of th» Stato of 8«w Tori: instructtons ««re iasued by
th» Controller to Se» Tori eouasel io tei» th» n o e m m tv «top» to
proeecute ®n appeal to th» Appellato Divisto» of th« court*
The appeal ean net bc perfoeted »itti th» entry of final
jud^aent and «e uuderstand that under thè required procedure tt le
neceaaaxy for eounsel for thè clearing house beni* to «ubait fornai

findinge to thè court preltninaiy to thè entry ©f thè Jndgnent*

Our

m , i l no* report that theee finding» are being preparai by eouneel
for thè clearing house banke and that they wtll he presente* to thè
court «bea it reconreaes in Septenber*
le bare requeated oar attorwye to «spedite thè procedi»«!
etape as nuch «e poesible In ondar that tl» questione Imolvwl n*y
he determinaci m appeal et thè earllest date precticable*

J.

fé té OtCOS^iR,

Conptroller of thè Currency

PRFBS RUBASI

In response to numeroug inquietes conceroing thè presesi
status of thè sali filed by thè Conptroller of thè Currency and thè
Reeeiver of thè Harriaan gattonai Bank and Trust Coapany againet
certain clearing house hanks In He* loitp thè Conpiroller of thè
Currency state» that shortly after thè dedalea eas rendered by thè

Supreme Court of thè State of Se» Tork Instructions »ere lssued by
thè Conptroller to Se» Tork oounsel to take thè neeessary steps to
pressante aa appeal to thè Appellate Divieto» of thè court«
The appesi osa mot he perfected until thè entry of finsi
judgaent and »e understand that under thè required procedure li 1»
neeessary for counsel for thè clearing house hanks to subaii formai
findings to thè court preliminary to thè entry of thè judgaent*

Our

counsel nov report that these findings are heing prepared by counsel
for thè clearing house hanks and that they »111 he preseated to thè
court uhen it reconvenes in Septeaber«
He have requested our attomeys to expedlte thè proeedural
steps es imch as posslhls in order that thè queetions involved nsy
he deteralned on appeal ai thè earllest date practicable*

f* t

« ©«cosso»,

Conptroller of thè Currency«

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, August 25, 1936

Press Service
No. 8-24

In response to numerous inquiries concerning the present status of the
suit filed by the Comptroller of the Currency and the Receiver of the
Harriman National Bank and Trust Company against certain clearing house banks
in New York, J. *F. T. O ’Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today stated that
shortly after the decision was rendered by the Supreme Court of the State of
New York instructions were issued by the Comptroller to New York counsel to
take the necessary steps to prosecute an appeal to the Appellate Division of
the court,

Mr, O ’Connor said:

"The appeal can not be perfected until the entry of final judgment and
r

we understand that under the required procedure it is necessary for counsel for
the clearing house banks to submit formal findings to the court preliminary to
the entry of the judgment.

Our counsel now report that these findings are

being prepared by counsel for the clearing house banks and that they will be
presented to the court when it reconvenes in September,
"We have requested our attorneys to expedite the procedural steps as
much as possible in order that the questions involved may be determined on appeal
at the earliest date practicable,"

— oOo—

Th® Commissloner of Customs today announced preliminary figures
for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian
Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to August 15, 1936, and the
percentage that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the
quota provisions, as follows;

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
Sta

AUG 2 6 1936

TO MR« FUSSBLL
Boom 289- Treasury Department)
FROM MISS HENRY:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
iag>orts of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade
Agreement, during the period from January 1 to August 18, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, will you kindly
have 45 copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Bldg.?

TREASURY D EP AFcTI.iHIT
Washington

August 26, 1936*

Since the issuance of the Memorandum for the Press dated August 24, 1936,
listing receipts of gold by the Mints and Assay Offices, for the vreek ended
August 21, 1936, the New York Assay Office has revised its report.
following table presents the corrected reports:
°
Imports

New
Domestic ~j

Secondary

P h i l a d e l p h i a ...............•»•***$
9,442.16
New York
19,702,800.00
IZ
1,499,086.61

| 100,815.77
358,617.00
23,053.02

New Orleans ¡¡.A..................
4,124.06
Seattle ...... T.............. . ........ .
Total for week ended Aug. £1,$21*222,767.97

21,790.15

— oOO'

The

4 530,576.21

I
257,oOO.OO

j||,'J

W>»

-

»

* I

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
*
Wednesday, August 26, 1936.

Press Service
* * 8 “ 25

Th.e Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to August 15, 1936, and the percentage that such imports|
bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows.

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Percent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Mas sachusett s
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

(a)

141,200
90.6^

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
3,606
18,0/o

26,986
3,502
21,832
231
67
562

-----•
6,642
38,853
906
1,328
3,102

22

Total from Canada

429
290
16,586
121,340

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,151
6,950
5,702
57
19,860

(a) The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.

1
-

11
**
702
38
—
—
31
—
**
311
2,108
404
3,606
—

m
-

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
August 31, 1936,

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended.
Week ended August 28, 1936:
P h i l a d e l p h i a ................................
741,230.02
San Francisco ...........................
411,072.42
Denver ............................................
12,287.05
Total for week ended August 28, 1936 ..............
1,164,585.49
Total, receipts through August 28, 1936 ..........
98,107,942.45

fineounces

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended August 28, 1936t
59.00 fine ounces
Philadelphia ........... . ........ ............... .
1 , 002.88
»
»
New Y o r k ................................ •*......
85.65
*
"
San Francisco ....................................
Denver ........................................... *
New Orleans ....... ............................. * •
Seattle ..................... ..... ...............
1,147.53
«
"
Total for week ended August 28, 1936 ..............
112,970,802.95
«
Total receipts through August 28, 1936 ............
RECEIPTS OF COLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Week ended August 28, 1936:
Imports
P h i l a d e l p h i a .................
$
3,757.84
New Y o r k .....................
9,090,600.00
962,246,67
San F r a n c i s c o .... .........
Denver .......................
14,547.93
New Orleans ..................
Seattle ......................
........ —
Total for week ended Aug. 28,1936 $10,071,152.44

Secondary
$
68,470.04
75,650.00
17,702.97
19,228.71
20,957.07
11.759,81
$ 213,768.60

New
Domestic
$
609.49
300,600.00
1,570,283.32
657,548.99
980.918.17
$3,509,959.97

GOLD RECEIVED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND THE TREASURER’S OFFICE*
(Under Secretary’s Order of December 28, 1933)
Received by Federal Reserve Banks*
Week ended August 26 . .............
Received p r e v i o u s l y .............. *•
Total to August 26 .................
Received by Treasurer’s Office:
Week ended August 2 6 ..... .........
Received p r e v i o u s l y ................
Total to August 26
...............
NOTE:

_____ Gold Coin
$
6,328.28
31,706,627.54
$31,712,955.82

$
$

—
268,656.00,
268,656.00

Gold bars deposited with the New York Office
in the amount of $200,572.69 previously reported.

PrQld C e r tific a te s
$
183,570.00
n o ,639.160.00$ 110,822,730.00

$

1,500.00
2 T499.120.00

$

2 , 500,620.00

TREASURY BEPARTEMT
WASHINGTON
Press service

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
TmesdMj Seutemhep
Sentemhep S
1» 122§*
19«o«----- Tuesday.
8/31/36

- >b

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced la s t
evening that the tenders for #50,000,000, or thereabouts, of
273-day Treasury h i l l s , dated September 8 , 1936, and maturing
June 3, 1937, which were offered on August 28, were opened at
the Federal Reserve banks on Angust 31.
The to ta l amount applied fo r was 1176,162,000, of
which §50,012,000 was accepted.

The accepted b id s ranged in

price from 99.909, equivalent to a rate of 0.120 percent per
annum, to 99.883, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.154 percent
per annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only part o f the amount

bid fo r at the la t t e r price was accepted.

The average price

o f Treasury b i l l s to be issu ed i s 99.887 and the average rate
i s about 0.149 percent per annum on a bank discount b a s is .

t

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Tuesday, Septenber 1 . 1936.
'

8/31/36

Press Service

-------- *---- ~ ------

No-

8-26

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 373-day Treasury bills, dated
September

3,

1936, and maturing June

3,

1937, which were offered on August 38

were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on August 31.
The total amount applied for was $176,163,000, of which $50,013,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.909, equivalent to a

rate of 0.130 percent per annum, to 99.883, equivalent to a rate of about 0.154
percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for

The average price of Treasury bills to be

issued is 99.887 and the average rate is about 0.149 percent per annum on a
bank discount basis.

— oOo—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
O F F IC E O F T H E S E C R E T A R Y

W A SH IN G T O N

COMMISSIONER OF
ACCOUNTS AND DEPOSITS

September 2, 19360

TO MR» GASTON:
During the month of August, 1936, the following market
transactions took place in Government securities for investment ac­
counts r
Total purchases
Total sales

•••

• • « $3,795,850

• ♦ ♦ • • • • • • •

Net purchases r

1,000

#3,794,850

- 5 -

Dividend payments during August, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent national
banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated $2,756,090,
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the bank­
ing holiday of March, 1933» aggregated $735,94-2,216*

- A -

The Planters National Bank of Walnut Ridge, Arkansas, in receivership Novem­
ber 11, 1930} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $75,237, which represented 72.24 per cent of total liabilities.^
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 57.9 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of New Cumberland, West Virginia, in receivership No­
vember 21, 1927} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $191,987, which represented 29.10 per cent of total liabilitie.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 16.375 per cent of their claim
The First National Bank of Ceylon, Minnesota, in receivership December 8, 1933}
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $88,827, which represented 79.70 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 71.95 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Sweetwater, Texas, in receivership December 14,
1931} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $506,845, which represented 72.59 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse­

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 57.15 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Aledo, Illinois, in receivership September 27, 1928
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $417,896, which represented 73.83 per cent of total liabilities.

U n sec u red

depositors received dividends amounting to 65.61 per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank in Cement, Oklahoma, in receivership October 4, 19335
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors sggre
gated $110,086, which represented 94.33 per cent of total liabilities.
depositors received dividends amounting to 80 per cent of their claims.

U n sec u red

- 3 -

The First National Bank of Dawson, Minnesota, in receivership May H , 1931}
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors ag­
gregated $122,756, which represented 50.19 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse­

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 27.32 per cent of their claims.
The Citizens National Bank of Greenwood, Indiana, in receivership October 29,
1934; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with inter­
est in full amounting to an additional dividend of 11.82 per cent.

Total payments

to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $304,202, and the stockholders
received $4,442, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Cherokee, Kansas, in receivership February 17,
1932} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $152,197, which represented 95.74 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse­

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 94.15 per cent of their claims.
The Peoples National Bank of Salem, New York, in receivership September 23,
1931} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $464,165, which represented 82.31 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse­

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 80.519 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Arlington, Nebraska, in receivership June 17, 1932}
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $81,070, which represented 68.44 per cent of total liabilities.

U n sec u red

depositors received d i v i d e r s amounting to 55.136 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Reynolds, Georgia, in receivership October 20,
1932} disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors

aggregated $90,324, which represented 71.72 per cent of total liabilities.
cured depositors

Unse-

received dividends amounting to 50.7 per cent of their claims.

-

2

-

full amounting to an additional dividend of 8*933 per cent*

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $4-25>74-0, and the stockholders
received $4,351, together with the assets remaining uncollected*
The First National Bank of Blytheville, Arkansas, in receivership November 6,
1931; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal and a portion
of the interest, amounting to an additional dividend of 10*25 per cent.

Total pay­

ments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $206,009*
The Nephi National Bank of Nephi, Utah, in receivership January 26, 1932} dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $107,665, which represented 74.05 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 43.65 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Doon, Iowa, in receivership October 22, 1931$ dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $60,329* which represented 33*50 per cent of total liabilities*

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 43.12 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Midland City, Alabama, in receivership September
28, 1931$ disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other credi­
tors aggregated $112,473, which represented 80*65 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 34.45 per cent of their
claims•
The Commercial National Bank of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, in receivership
June 12, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $625,737, which represented 77.22 per cent of total liabilities
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 35 per cent of their claims.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

^

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,

Press Service

J. F. T. O ’Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today announced the comple­
tion of the liquidation of 21 receiverships during August, 1936, making a total
of 441 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the so-called
banking holiday of March, 1933*

Total disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors of these 44-1 institutions, exclusive of the 42
receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated $122,766,970, or an average return
of 74«25 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors received divi­
dends amounting to an average of 58*98 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Oneida, Illinois, in receivership June 21, 1932;
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest

in

full amounting to an additional dividend of 8*73 per cent*

cred­

Total payments to

itors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $131,956, and the stockholders receive
$128, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Elma, Washington, in receivership November 16, 1933
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 12»808 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $202,320, and the stockholders
received $930, together with the assets remaining uncollected*
The First National Bank of Olive, California, in receivership January 26, 19.
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 12.93 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $91,335, and the stockholders re­
ceived $859, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Farmers National Bank of Garner, Iowa, in receivership March 20, 19345
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Monday« September 7. 1936______
9/3/36.

Press Service
N o . 8*27

J. F. T. 0*Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today announced the
completion of the liquidation of

21

receiverships duripg August, 1936,

making a total of 441 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency
since the so-called hanking holiday of March, 1933.
including offsets allowed, to

Total disbursements,

depositors and other creditors of these 441

institutions, exclusive of the 42 receiverships restored to solvency, aggre­
gated $122,766,970, or an average return of 74.25 per cent of total liabili­
ties, while unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to an average
of 58.98 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Oneida,
1932;

Illinois, in receivership June 21,

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with

interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.73 per cent. Total
payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $131,956, and
the stockholders received $128, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Elma, Washington, in receivership November
16, 1933;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal

with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 12.808 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $202,320,
and the stockholders received $930, together with the assets remaining un­
collected.
The First National Bank of Olive, California, in receivership January
26, 1934;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per

cent principal

with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 12.93 per cent.

2

Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $91,335,
and the stockholders received $859, together with the assets remaining un­
collected.
The Farmers national B ank of Garner, Iowa, in receivership March 20,
1934;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal.with

interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.938 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $425,740,
and the stockholders received $4,351, together with the assets remaining
uncollected.
The First National B ahk of Blytheville, Arkansas, in receivership
November

6,

1931;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent

principal and a portion of the interest, amounting to an additional divi­
dend of 10.25 per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $206,009.
The Nephi National Bank of Nephi, Utah, in receivership January 26,
1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $107,665, which represented 74.05 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 48.65

per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Doon, Iowa, in receivership October 22,1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $60,329, which represented 33.50 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 48.12 per cent of their
claims*
The First National Bank of Midland City, Alabama, in receivership
September 28, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

3

and other creditors aggregated $112,473, which represented 80.65 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 34.45 per cent of their claims.
The Commercial National Bank of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, in receiver­
ship June 12, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $625,737, which represented 77.22 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 35 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Lawson, Minnesota, in receivership May 14,
1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $122,756, which represented 50.19 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 27.32

per cent of their claims.
The Citizens National B ank of Greenwood, Indiana, in receivership
October 29, 1934;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent

principal with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 11.82
per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated

$304,202, and the stockholders received $4,442, together with the assets re­
maining uncollected.
The First National B ank of Cherokee, Kansas, in receivership February
17, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $152,197, which represented 95.74 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 94.15

per cent of their claims.
The Peoples National Bank of Salem, Ne?/ York, in receivership September
23, 1931,

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $464,165, which represented 82.31 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 80.519

per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Arlington, Nebraska, in receivership June
17, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $81,070, which represented 68.44 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 55.136

per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of R eynolds, Georgia, in receivership October
20, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $90,324, which represented 71.72 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 50.7 per

cent of their claims.
The Planters National B ank of W alnut Ridge, Arkansas, in receivership
November

11,

1930;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $75,237, which represented 72.24 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

57.9 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of New Cumberland, .West Virginia, in receiver­
ship November

2 1,

1927;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to de­

positors and other creditors aggregated $191,987, which represented 29.10
per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends

amounting to 16.375 per cent of their claims.
/A

The First National Bank of Ceylon, Minnesota, in receivership December

8,

1933,

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

5

creditors aggregated $88,827, which represented 79.70 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 71.95

per cent of their^claims.
The First National B ank of Sweetwater, Texas, in receivership December
14, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $506,845, which represented 72.59 per
liabilities.

cent of total

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 57.15

per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Aledo, Illinois, in receivership September
27, 1928;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $417,896, which represented 73.83 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 65.61

per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank in Cement, Oklahoma, in receivership October
4, 1933;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $110,086, which represented
liabilities.

94.33

per cent of total

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 80 per

cent of theim claims.
Dividend payments during August, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent
national banks to

the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated

$2,756,090.
Dividend payments to the creditors of adl active receiverships since
the banking holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $735,942,216.

---oOo---

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OB BESTOBED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
___________ ___________AUGUST 19^6_____________________

Receiverships:

Date of
Failure:

First National Bank, Oneida, Illinois
6- 21-32
First National Bank, Elma, Washington * 1 1 - 16-33
First National Bank, Olive, California *
I- 26- 3H
#
3- 20- 31*
Farmers National Bank, Garner, Iowa
First National Bank, Blytheville, Arkansasll— 6-31

Total
Disbursements,
Including
Offsets Allowed:
$

1 3 1 ,956.00
202,320.00
91,335.00
1+25,71+0.00
206,009.00

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

105.26
105.12
IO5 .6O
IOI+.51
106.23

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

102.73
112.202
112.93
102.932
110.25

Nephi National Bank, Nephi, Utah
1 - 26-32
First National Bank, Doon, Iowa
10- 22-31
First National Bank, Midland City, Alabama 9- 22-31
Commerpial National Bank, Hattiesburg,Miss#6-12-31
First National Bank, Dawson, Minnesota
5- 1 U-3 1

107,665.00
60,329.00
112,1+73.00
625,737.00
122 ,756.00

20.65

1+2.12
3I+.I+5

77.22
50.19

35
27.32

Citizens National Bank, Greenwood, Ind. * 10-29-31+
First National Bank, Cherokee, Kansas
2-17-32
Peoples National Bank, Salem, New York
9-23-31
iirst National Bank, Arlington, Nebraska
6- 17-32
First National Bank, Reynolds, Georgia
10- 20-32

30l+,202.00
152 ,197.00

IO 7.69
95.7^

i+61+,i 65.oo

Planters National Bank, Walnut Ridge, Ark l l - H -30
First National Bank, New Cumberland, W. V a a i - 21-27
First National Bank, Ceylon, Minn.
*
12 — 2-33
First National Bank, Sweetwater, Texas
12 - 11+-31
First National Bank, Aledo, Illinois
9- 27-22
First National Bank in Cement, Okla. *
10— 14-33

75,237.00
19 1 ,927.00
22,227.00
506.21+5.00
1+17 ,296.00
110 ,026.00

i/

Formerly in Conservatorship

2 1 ,070.00
90,321+.00

71+.05
33-50

22.31
62.1+1+

71.72
72.21+

29.IO
79.70
72.59

73*23
9*+*33

1+2.65

111.2 2
9I+.I5
20.519
55.136
50.7
57.9
16.375
71.95
57.15

65.61
20

f
K)

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
______________________AUGUST 1956_________________

Receiverships:

Date of
Failure:

Total
Disbursements,
Including
Offsets Allowed;

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

First National Bank, Oneida, Illinois
First National Bank, Elma, Washington *
First National Bank, Olive, California *
Farmers National Bank, G a m e r , Iowa
*
First National Bank, Blytheville, Arkansas

6-21-32
11-16-33
1-26-34
3-20-34
11-6-31

$ 131,956.00
202 ,320.00
91.335.00
425 ,740.00
206 ,009.00

10 5.8 6
10 5 .1 2
10 5.60

Nephi National Bank, Nephi Utah
First Ifetional Bank, Doon, Iowa
First National Bank, Midland City, Alabama
Commercial National Bank* Hattiesburg, Miss»
First National Bank, Dawson, Minnesota

1-26-32
10-22-31
9-28-31
6-12-31
5-14-31

1 0 7 ,665.00
60,329.00
112,473.00
625 ,737.0 0
122,756.00

74.05
33.50
8 O .6 5
77.22
50.19

34.45
35
27.32

Citizens National Bank, Greenwood, Ind. *
First National Bank, Cherokee, Kansas
Peoples National 3ank, Salem, New York
First National Bank, Arlington, Nebraska
First National Bank, Reynolds, Georgia

10-29-34
2-17-32
9-23-31
6-17-32
10 -20-32

304,202.00
152,197.00
464 ,165.0 0
8 1 ,070.00
90,324.00

107.69
95.74
82.31

111.82
94.15
80.519

68.44

5 5 .13 6

71.72

50.7

Planters National Bank, Walnut Ridge, Ark*
First National Bank, New Cumberland, W. Va.
First National Bank, Ceylon, Minn* *
First National Bank, Sweetwater, Texas
First National Bank, Aledo, Illinois
First National Bank in, Cement, Okla* *

1 1 -11 -3 0
1 1 -2 1 -2 7

75.237.00
191,987.00
88 ,827.00
506,845*00
417*896.00
110,086.00

7 2 .2 4
29 .IO

16 .3 7 5

U

Formerly in Conservatorship

12-8-33
12-14-31
9-27-28
10-4-33

104.51
106.23

79.70
72.59
73.83
94.33

108.73

112 ,8 0 8
112.93
108.938

110 .2 5
4 8 .6 5
4 8 .12

57.9
71.95
57.15

6 5 .6 1
80

l

%y

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

September 4, 1936.

TO MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MISS HENRY:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade
Agreement during the period from January 1 to August 22, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, will you kindly
have 45 copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Bldg.?

St a

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade, Agreement, for the period January 1 to
August 22, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to
the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Friday, September 4, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-28

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
imports of cattle under the quo4a provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to August 22, 1936, and the percentage that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New Y 0rk
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
V ermont
Washington
Total from Canada

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)
(a)

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or more
(Head)
142,504
91.5$

27,169
3,535
21,859
231
67
562
6,708
39,177
906
1,328
3,102

(a)

3,753
18.8$

1
-

11

494
290
16,853

773
38
—
31
311
2,150
438

122,303

3,753

7,432
7,010
5,702
57

-

22

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
Sail Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or more
(Head)

20,2 0 1

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled

-

: Under 175
Customs Districts
:
Pounds
________________________ :: (Head)
TOTAL IMPOSTS
Per cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
Ndw York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

(a)

:
:
:

Pounds
Or More
(Head)

:
:
:

700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

(a)
142,504
3,753
_____________________ 91,5$___________ 18,8$

27,169
3,535
21,859
231
67
562
6,708
39,177
906
1,328
3,102

1
-

11

494
290
16,853

773
38
31
311
2,150
438

122,303

3,753

7,432
7,010
5,702
57

-

20,201

-

22

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
Presa Service

Saturday. September 5. 1936.
9/4/36

8

"

—

QQ

Secretary o f the Treasury Morgenthau announced la st
evening that th e tenders fo r #50,000,000, or thereabouts, of
273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated September 9, 1936, and maturing
June 9 , 1937, which were offered on September 2 , were opened
a t the Federal Reserve banks on September 4 ,
The t o t a l amount applied f o r was #140,137,000, o f
which #50,147,000 was accepted.

The accepted b id s ranged in

p rice from 99.906, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.124 per­
cent per annum, to 99.897, equivalent to a rate o f about
0.136 percent per annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only part

o f the amount bid fo r a t the la t t e r price was accepted.

The

average price o f Treasury b i l l s to be issued i s 99.901 and the
average ra te i s about 0.130 percent per annum on a bank d is­
count b a s is .

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING- NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday. September 5. 1936,9/4/36.

Press Service
No. 8-29

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that
the tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills,
dated September 9, 1936, and maturing June 9, 1937, which were offered
on September 2, were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on September 4.
The total amount applied for was $140,137,000, of which $50,147,000
was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.906, equivalent to

a rate of about 0.124 percent per annum, to 99.897, equivalent to a rate
of about 0.136 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
the amount bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of

The average price of

Treasury bills to be issued is 99.901 and the average rate is about 0.130
percent per annum on a bank discount basis.

oOo—

UNITED STATES 0? AMERICA
£-3/4 PERCENT TRSASURY BONDS 07 1956-59
Dated and hearing interest from September 15, 1936

Due Septeaber 15, 1959

REDEEMABLE AT THE OFTION 07 THE UNITED STATES AT PAR AND ACCHJSD INTEREST ON AND AJTSB
SEPTEMBER 15, 1956
Interest payable March 15 end Septeaber 15

TRSASUKT DEPARTMENT,
Office of thè Secretary,
Washington, September 8, 19

1936
Department Cincular No, 567
Publio Debt Service
I, OTORINO 07 BONDS

1« The Secretary of thè Treasury, pursuant to thè euthority of thè Seeond
Liberty Bond Aot, approyed Septeaber £4, 1917, as eaended, invites subscriptione, at
par and aoorued interest, from thè people of thè United States for £-3/4 percent
bonds of thè United States, deslgnated Treasury Bonds of 1956-59» The aaount of
thè offering le #400,000,000, or thereabouts, with thè right reserved to thè Secretary
of thè Treasury to Increase thè offering by ah aaount sufflè ient to aooept all subsorlptions for ehloh Treasury Kòtes of Serles D-1936, maturing September 15, 1936, are
tenderad in payaont and aoooptod»
II» DSSCRIPTION 07 BONDS
1» The bonds vili be dated September 15, 1936, and «ili bear interest from that
date at thè rate of £-3/4 percent per annua, payable semiannually on March 15 and
September 15 in eaoh year untll thè prinolpal aaount becomes payable, They sili
mature Septeaber 15, 1959, but aay be redeemed at thè optlon of thè United States
on and after Septeaber 15, 1956, in shole or in part, at par and aoorued interest, on
any interest day or days, on 4 months’ notino of redemption givan in such manner as
thè Secretary of thè Treasury shall presoribe»

In case of parttal redempt ion thè

bonds to bo redeemed sili be determined by such aethod as aay bs

*ibed by thè

Interest on th© public debt to the amount of about 1185,000,000
is payable on September 15, 1936.

The amount of Treasury notes of

Series D-1936 maturing on September 15, 1936, which may
for the Treasury bonds now offered, is $514,066,000*
The text of the official circular follows:

be exchanged

-

2-

banks and the Treasury Department are authorized to act as official
agencies.

With respect to cash subscriptions, applications from banks

and trust companies for their own account will be received without
deposit but will be restricted in each case to an amount not exceeding
one-half of the combined capital and surplus of the subscribing bank or
trust company.

Cash subscriptions from all others must be accompanied,

if for •5,000 or less by payment in full; and, if for more than #5,000,
by payment of 10 percent of the amount applied for, but not less than
#5,000.

With respect to exchange subscriptions, such subscriptions

should be accompanied by a like face amount of 1-1/2 percent Treasury
notes of Series D-1936 tendered in payment.
Subject to the reservations set forth in the official circular,,
cash subscriptions for amounts up to and including #5,000 will be given
preferred allotment, cash subscriptions for amounts over #5,000 will be
allotted on an equal percentage basis, but not less than the maximum
preferred allotment, and exchange subscriptions will be allotted in full.
Payment for any bonds allotted must be made or completed on or before
September 15, 1936.

The right is reserved to close the books as to any

or all subscriptions or classes of subscriptions at any time without
notice.
In order to provide an equitable allotment and distribution of the
bonds among all classes of subscribers, all banking institutions and
others concerned are again urged to cooperate in the manner outlined in
Department letter of May 27, 1936, addressed to the President of each
Federal Reserve bank and made public at that time.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Ton RELEASE,

MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. September 8, 1936.

Pres» Service
**o. Y~ & ®

9-5-36

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau is today offering for subscrip­
tion, at par and accrued interest, through the Federal Reserve banks
#400,000,000, or thereabouts, of 20-23 year 2-3/4 percent Treasury bonds
of 1956-®|, with the right reserved to the Secretary of the Treasury to
increase the offering by an amount sufficient to accept all subscriptions
for which payment la tondored 4 » 1-1/2 percent Treasury notes of Series
D-1936, maturing September 15, 1936,
The Treasury bonds of 1956-tfl now offered for cash, and in exchange
for Treasury notes maturing September 15, 1936, will be dated September 15,
1936, and will bear Interest fro® that date at the rate of 2-5/4 percent
per annum payable semiannually*

They will mature September 15, 19^f, but

may be redeemed at the option of the United States on and after September
15, 1956*
The Treasury bonds will be accorded the same exemptions fro® taxation
as are accorded other issues of Treasury bonds now outstanding.

These

provisions are specifically set forth in the official circular issued today.
The bonds will be issued in two forms, bearer bonds with interest
coupons attached, and bonds registered as to both principal and interest;

both forms will be issued in the denominations of $50, #100, #500, #1,000,
#5,000, $10,000 and #100,000.
Applications will be received at the Federal Reserve banks and branches,
and at the Treasury Department, Washington*

Banking institutions generally

may submit subscriptions for account of customers, but only the Federal Reserve

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. September 8. 1936«
9-5-36

Press Service
No* 8-30

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau is today offering for subscription,
at par and accrued interest, through the Federal Reserve hanks $400,000,000, or
thereabouts, of 20-23 year 2-3/4 percent Treasury bonds of 1956-59, with the
right reserved to the Secretary of the Treasury to increase the offering by an
amount sufficient to accept all subscriptions for which 1-1 ¡2 percent Treasury
notes of Series D-1936, maturing September 15, 1936, are tendered in payment and
accepted*
The Treasury bonds of 1956-59 now offered for cash, and in exchange for
Treasury notes maturing September 15, 1936, will be dated September 15, 1936, and
will bear interest from that date at the rate of 2-3/4 percent per annum payable
semiannually*

They will mature September 15, 1959, but may be redeemed at the

option of the United States on and after September 15, 1956*
The Treasury bonds will be accorded the same exemptions from taxation as
are accorded other issues of Treasury bonds now outstanding.

These provisions

are specifically set forth in the official circular issued today*
The bonds will be issued in two forms, bearer bonds with interest coupons
attached, and bonds registered as to both principal and interest; both forms will
be issued in the denominations of $50, $100, $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000 and

$100, 000.
Applications will be received at the Federal Reserve banks and branches,
and at the Treasury Department, Washington*

Banking institutions generally may

submit subscriptions for account of customers, but only the Federal Reserve banks
and the Treasury Department are authorized to act as official agencies*

With

respect to cash subscriptions, applications from banks and trust companies for

-

2

-

th6ir own account will be received without deposit but will be restricted in each
case to an amount not exceeding nne-half of the combined capital and surplus
of the subscribing bank or trust company#

Cash subscriptions from all others

must be accompanied, if for $5,000 or less by payment in full; and, if for more
than $5,000, by payment of 10 percent of the amount applied for, but not less than
$5,000#

With respect to exchange subscriptions, such subscriptions should be

accompanied by a like face amount of 1-1/2 percent Treasury notes of Series
D-1936 tendered in payment.
Subject to the reservations set forth in the official circular, cash sub­
scriptions for amounts up to and including $5,000 will be given preferred allot­
ment, cash subscriptions for amounts over $5,000 will be allotted on an equal
percentage basis, but not less than the maximum preferred allotment, and exchange
subscriptions will be allotted in full#

Payment for any bonds allotted must be

made or completed on or before September 15, 1936#

The right is reserved to

close the books as to any or all subscriptions or classes of subscriptions at
any time without notice.
In order to provide an equitable allotment and distribution of the bonds
among all classes of subscribers, all banking institutions and others concerned
are again urged to cooperate in the manner outlined in Department letter of
May 27, 1936, addressed to the President of each Federal Reserve bank and made
public at that time#
Interest on the public debt to the amount of about $155,000,000 is payable
on September 15, 1936.

The amount of Treasury notes of Series D-1936 maturing

on September 15, 1936, which may be exchanged for the Treasury bonds now offered,
is $514,066,000.
The text of the official circular follows;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2-3/4 PERCENT TREASURY BONDS OF 1956-59

Dated and bearing interest from September 15, 1936

Due September 15, 1959

REDEEMABLE AT THE OPTION OF THE UNI RED STATES AT PAR AND ACCRUED INTEREST ON AND AFTER
SEPTEMBER 15, 1956
Interest payable March 15 and September 15

1936
Department Circular No. 567

TREASURY DEPARTMENT,
Office of the Secretary,
Washington, September 8, 1936.

Public Debt Service
I.
1*

OFFERING OF BONDS

The Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the authority of the Second

Liberty Bond Act, approved September 24, 1917, as amended, invites subscriptions, at
par and accrued interest, from the people of the United States for 2-3/4 percent
bonds of the United States, designated Treasury Bonds of 1956-59.

The amount of

the offering is $400,000,000, or thereabouts, with the right reserved to the
Secretary of the Treasury to increase the offering by an -amount sufficient to
accept all subscriptions for which Treasury Notes of Series D-1936, maturing
September 15, 1936, are tendered in payment and accepted.
II.
1.

DESCRIPTION OF BONDS

The bonds will be dated September 15, 1936, and will bear interest from that

date at the rate of 2-3/4 percent per annum, payable semiannually on March 15 and
September 15 in each year until the principal amount becomes payable*

They will

mature September 15, 1959, but may be redeemed at the option of the United States
on and after September 15, 1956, in whole or in part, at par and accrued interest, on
an7 interest day or days, on 4 months’ notice of redemption given in such manner as;
the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe.

In case of partial redemption the

bonds to be redeemed will be determined by such method as may be

prescribed "by the Secretary of the Treasury,

From the date of redemption desig-

noted in any such notice, interest on the bonds called for redemption shall cease,

2.

Hie bonds shall bo exempt, both as to principal and interest, from all

taxation now or hereafter imposed by the United States, any State, or any of the
possessions of the United States, or by any local taxing authority* except (a)
ostate or inheritance taxes, cr gift taxes, and (b) graduated additional income
taxes, commonly known as surtaxes, and excess-profits and war-prof its taxes, now
or hereafter imposed by the*United States, upon the income or profits of individual
partnerships, associations,

or corporations.

authorized by the Second Liberty Bond Act

The interest on an amoun t of bonds

approved September 24, 1917 , as amended,

the principal of which does not exceed in the aggregate $ 5 ,000, owned by any
individual, partnership, association, or corporation, shall bo exempt from the
taxes provided for in clause (b) above.
3.

The bonds will boacceptable to secure deposits of public

moneys, but will

not bear the circulation privilege and will not be entitled to any privilege of
conversion*
4.

Bearer bonds with interest coupons attached, and bonds registered as to

principal and interest, will be issued in denominations of $50, $100, $500, $1,000,
$5,000, $10,000 and $100,000*

Provision will be made for the interchange of bonds

of different denominations and of coupon and registered bonds, and for.the transfer
of registered bonds, under rules and regulations prescribed by

the Secretary of the

Treasury.
5*

The bonds will be subject to the general regulations of the Treasurer

Department, now or hereafter prescribed, governing United States bonds.
III.
1*

SUBSCRIPTION AND ALLOTMENT

Subscriptions will be received at the Federal Reserve banks and branches

aud at the Treasury Department, Washington

Banking institutions generally may

- 3 submit subscriptions for account of customers,

out only the Federal Reserve banks

and the Treasury Department are authorized to act as official agencies.

Others

than banking institutions will not be permitted to enter subscriptions except for
their own account.

Cash subscriptions from banks and trust corpajiics for their own

account will be received without deposit but will be restricted in each ease to an
amount not exceeding one-half of tile combined capital and surplus of the subscrib­
ing bank or trust company.

Cash subscriptions from all others must be accompanied,

if for $5,000 or less by payment in full; and, if for core than $5,000, by payment
of 10 percent of the amount of bonds applied for, but not less than $5,000.

The

Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to close the books as to any or all
subscriptions or cla,sses of subscriptions at any time without notice.

2.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to reject any subscrip­

tion, in whole or in part, to allot loss than the amount of bonds applied for, to
cake allotments in full upon applications for smaller amounts and to make reduced
allotments upon, or to reject, applications for larger amounts, or to adopt any or
all of said methods or such other methods of allotment and classification of allot­
ments as shall be deemed by him to be in the public interest; and his action in any
or all of these respects shall be final.

Subject to these reservations, cash sub­

scriptions for amounts up to and including $ 5,000 will be given preferred allot­
ment; cash subscriptions for amounts over $5,000 will be allotted on an equal per­
cent age basis, but not loss than the maximum preferred allotment; and subscriptions
in payment of which Treasury Dotes of Series D-1936 are tendered will be allotted
ln full.

Allotment notices will be sent' out promptly upon allotment, and the

basis of the allotment will be publicly announced.
IV.
1.

PAYMENT

Payment at par and accrued interest, if any, for bonds allotted on cash

subscriptions must be made or completed on or before September 15, 1936, or on later

- 4 allotment.

In every case wnere payment is not so completed, the payment with,

application up to

10

percent of the amount of "bonds applied for shall, upon declara­

tion made "by the Secretary of the Treasury in his discretion, be forfeited to the
United States.

Any qualified depositary will he permitted to make payment "by

ciedit for oonds allotted to it for itself and its customers up to any amount for
which it shall he qualified in excess of existing deposits, when so notified by
the federal Reserve hank of its district.

Treasury Notes of Series D-1936,

aaturing September 15, 1936, will he accepted at par in payment for any bonds
subscribe^ for and allotted, and such payment should be made when the subscription
is tendered#
V.
1#

GENERAL PROVISIONS

As fiscal agents of the United States, federal Reserve banks are authorized

and requested to receive subscriptions, to make allotments on the basis and up to
the amounts indicated by the Secretary of the Treasury to the federal Reserve banks
of the respective districts, to issue allotment notices , to receive payment for
bonds allotted, to make delivery of bonds on full-paid subscriptions allotted, and
they may issue interim receipts pending delivery of the definitive bonds#

2.

The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time, or from time to time, pre­

scribe supplemental or amendatory rules and regulations governing the offering,
which will be communicated promptly to the federal Reserve banks.

HENRY M0RG3HTHAU, JR.,
Secretary of the Treasury#

trsäsüht

9 m m i Stffiw
fr

f o t « m i * mmsm wm m m 9
ladaoo&oy. Soptoafrf tr XW&*.—

9/9/U
mwnrr-r of tu.

m m h t

uorgwtto» .»««»m í »«* »«*» *»»* tu.

«tooriptio« took. for «to « « t o « t m l m « « / * ^

tlnmmUT ****

Of W M - W . U M i at t M olOM Of t o « * « *»•*•*• S^ * - W

talpt of oatb subscriptions*
tto MtotoiptiO« M U » « U 01.M to tu. .10.0 to

tt«w-

a^ttotor 10, for tto r«.lpt of .«to.riptloM 1» S t o ~ * « * * *
TroMtof Soto, of tori» »-MS*, »tort»« S.pto*tor IS, 1»*, « • ttotorto.
a u n « U M r t p t l o » p i » . * to tu.

mil

«.for. 1*

Tootoay, S.ptoto«r S, **i • « » “*• w t o e r i p t l o » » » « * U

-ttottot.
tu. » U

1* o'«look «Multo», ftowtop, topi-tor » , tott to ootoMorto «

mm

tofo*.

Uorl««

« t o r t o tolto, tto «loo. to tu. « M o r i s t i « M o t o .

toaenMOMut of tto .»mat of

om

U «toorlptioM « * »to Utoi. of

alletuMt toll probably to «to. m T r i i a i , Sopt«tor U .

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Wednesday, September 9. 1936.
9/8/36.

Press Service
No. 8-31

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last night that the
subscription books for the current offering of 2-3/4 percent Treasury Bonds
of 1956~59 closed at the close of business Tuesday, September

8,

for the

receipt of cash subscriptions.
The subscription books will close at the close of business Thursday,
September 10, for the receipt of subscriptions in payment of which Treasury
Notes of Series D-1936, maturing September 15, 1936, are tendered.
Cash subscriptions placed in the mail before 12 o ’clock midnight,
Tuesday, September

8,

and exchange subscriptions placed in the mail before

12 o ’clock midnight, Thursday, September 10, will be considered as having
been entered before the close of the subscription books.
Announcement of the amount of cash subscriptions and the basis of
allotment will probably be made on Friday, September 11.

— oOo—

From Jan©l,1920 to Aug.3,1920 he served with the

epartment of Justice

deputy of the Fair Price Commission for New York State©
From

1922 to 1925 he was Special Agent in Charge of the Intelligence

Unit at St©Louis

JU
crv
*rr: *

u

O ^ o, 'X—
5 $

7

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today announced the appointment of

Frank JetarWilson, to he acting chief of the Secret Service,xamsssuiHAisg effective

^

/V

immediately* Wilson comes to Secret Service

from the Intelligence Unit of the

Bureau of Internal Revenue, with ■which organization he has been identified since
Aug.3,1920, with the exception of six months in 1926 when he was engaged in private
business in Florida*
in Charge
Since June 1,1934 Wilson has been Special Agent/of the SakaiiigKBBBxUnztziBX
-V'<^

i

u

Cleveland division, comprising Ohio,Indiana and Kentucky*
_ ****

In 1930 and 1931 Wilson was det_ai_JLed to Chicago to take charge of the
governments ^income tax drive^^pipsi JU. Capone and ten u

* Wilson's

deciphering of impounded Capone bookkeeping records enabled the government to conned
Al Capone with various underworld activities,proving income tax evasions and
resulting in an eleven year prison sentence; ten years in federal prisons and one
year in the Cook bounty (ill*) jail®
A few days after the kidnaping of the Lindbergh baby in March. 1932,Wilson and
other Intelligence Unit agents were sent to aid in the case* He has among his prize«
possessions personal letters from Col. Lindbergh,expressing appreciation for his
assistance*
Wilson was Born at Buffalo,N.Y., iax May 19,1886*He graduated from Buffalo
higlJschool and spent one year at the University of Buffalo* For ten years tism. he
/the real estate business in Buffalo*
He enlisted in the army in 1917 but m s discharged after a month because of
defective eyesight*

he served^as investigator for the joint commissnj

of the N.Y. Fair Price commission anTrd the U.S.Food Administration .On Sept#l,1919
he became vice-chairman of the £ commission ¿named by the mayor of Buffalo to
dispose of surplus army foods,selling more than 300 carloads of foodstuffs*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday. September 8. 1936.

Press Service
Ho. 8-32

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today announced the appointment of
Prank J. Wilson, to he Acting Assistant Chief of the Secret Service, effective
immediately*

Wilson comes to Secret Service from the Intelligence Unit of the

Bureau of Internal Bevenue, with which organization he has been identified since
August 3, 1920, with the exception of six months in 1926 when he was engaged in
private business in Florida.
Since June 1,^. 1934 Wilson has been Special Agent in Charge of the
Cleveland Division, comprising Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky.
In 1930 and 1931 Wilson was detailed to Chicago to take charge of the
Government1 s income tax drive involving AL Capone and his associates.

Wilsons

deciphering of impounded Capone bookkeeping records enabled the Government to
connect A1 Capone with various underworld activities, proving income tax
evasions and resulting in an eleven year prison sentence; ten years in federal
prisons and one year in the Cook County (ill.) jail.
A few days after the kidnaping of the Lindbergh baby in March, 1932,
Wilson and other Intelligence Unit agents were sent to aid in the case*

He has

among his prized possessions personal letters from Colonel Lindbergh, expressing
appreciation for his assistance.
Wilson was born at Buffalo, N.Y., May 19, 1886*

He graduated from Buffalo

high school and spent one year at the University of Buffalo.

For ten years he

was engaged in the real estate business in Buffalo.
He enlisted in the army in 1917, but was discharged after a month be­
cause of defective eyesight.

From January 2, 1918 to September 1, 1919

he

served as investigator for the joint commission of the New York Fair Price Com­
mission and: the United States Food Administration.

Cn September 1, 1919 he

became vice-chairman of the commission named by the Mayor of Buffalo to dispose

-

2

-

of surplus army foods, selling more than 300 carloads of foodstuffs.
Prom January 1, 1920 to August 3, 1920 he served with the Department of
Justice as a deputy of the Pair Price Commission for Hew York State.
Prom 1922 to 1925 he was Special Agent in Charge of the Intelligence
Unit at St. Louis.

— oOo—

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)

FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release shov­
ing preliminary figures for imports of commodities coming into
the United States from the Philippine Islands, under the quota
provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage
Act of 1938, for the period January 1 to August 29, 1936.
Whdn this tabulation has been mimeographed, vill you kindly
have 15 copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Bldg.?

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for imports of commodities coming into the United
States from the Philippine Islands, under the quota provisions
of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935,
for the period January 1 to August 29, 1936, and the percentage
that such imports hear to the totals allowable under the quotas,
as follows:

IMPORTS Of COMMODITIES FROM Tgg, PHILïPPîNEâ UNDER QUOTA
I N D M i ^ l S s E ACT AND CORDAGE ACT OF 1935

m »g

During the*

CUSTOIvSS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin

)

S u g a r s

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPOSTS
Per Cent of Quota

%vto August 29, 1936

Refined
[Pounds)
219,867,851
49.1$

**
•
8,228,760
3,250,500
22,441,790
•
36,994,685
117,361,825
•
—
6,783,872
*
•
•
**
24,802,669
•
3,750

93,515,242
83.5$

1,590,972,647
88.8$

5,000

8,948,785
9,016,528
7,917

es

•
18,346,012
499,329
*
•
•
3,744,293
es

23,516,923
-

•

81,623,296
6,604,440
•

296,373,217
456,864,524
•>
49,076
602,606,851

ms

e»

—
•
7,136,753
40,264,932

•
128,878,013
•
•

Quota year commenced May.l.

(Prepüred^by Division of StatistAea*aik4*

Ml

2,525,065
42,1*

170,662
37,284
•

60,531
204,073
m
30,496
6,251
25,831
998,395
2,048
79,490
11,371
49,722
13,615
1,837
128,876
458,774
14,677
143,133
87,997

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
imports of commodities coming into the United States from the Philippine
Islands, under the quota provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and
the Cordage Act of 1935, for the period January

1

to August 29, 1936, and

the percentage that such imports hear to the totals allowable under the
quotas, as follows*
S u g a r s
Coconut Oil
Refined
Unrefined
Cordage*
_______ (Pounds)
(Pounds)__________(Pounds)_____ ( Pounds)
TOTAL IMPORTS
219,867,851 ' 93,513,242
1,590,972,647 2,525,063
Per cent of Quota _____ 49.1 j
o_________ 83.5jo_____ _______ 88.8^__________. 42.1$

Customs Districts

CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin

- - - - - - - - - - ----------------8,228,760
3,250,500
22,441,790
- - - - - 36,994,685
117,361,825
- - --- - ----------6,783,872
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24,802,669
- - - - - 3,750
- - - - - -

*Quota year commenced May 1*

- - - - 5,000
----------------18,346,012
499,329
- - - - - ----3,744,293
- - - - - 23,516,923
*
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7,136,753
40,264,932
- - - - - -

- - - - - - - 8,948,785
9,016,528
7,917
------------81,623,296
6,604,440
** *#' - •
»
296,373,217
456,864,524
- - - - - - 49,076
602,606,851
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 128,878,013
- - - - - - ------------- - - - - - -

170,662
37,284
- - - 60,531
204,073
-30,496
6,251
25,831
998,395
2,048
79,490
11,371
49,722
13,615
1,837
128,876
458,774
14,677
143,133
87,997

TREASURY DEPARTIRENT
Washington
Press Service
No. 8-33

EOE IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, September 9, 1936,

The Commissioner of Customs today announced, preliminary figures for
imports of commodities coming into the United States from the Philippine
Islands, under the quota provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and
the Cordage Act of 1935, for the period January 1 to August 29, 1936, and
the percentage that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the
quotas, as follows!"

Customs Districts
Coconut Oil
________________________ (Pounds)
TOTAL IMPORTS
219,867,851
Per cent of Quota ______ 49.1^
CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St, Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin

___________
___________
8,228,760
3,250,500
22,441,790
36,994,685
117,361,825
-----------6,783,872

24,802,669

*Quota year commenced May 1

3,750

S u g a r s
Refined
Unrefined
Cordage*
(Pounds)__________(Pounds)_____ ( Pounds) _
93,513,242
1,590,972,647 2,525,063
83.5^
....
88.85p ... ... —
42.lff_

5,000

170,662
37,284

8,948,785
9,016,528
______________________________ 7,917 60,531
204,073
18,346,012
------- ----499,329
81,623,296
30,496
6,604,440
6,251
25,831
----------296,373,217
998,395
3,744,293
456,864,524
2,048
79,490
23,516,923
49,076
11,371
----------602,606,851
49,722
13,615
1,837
128,876
458,774
7,136,753
128,878,013
14,677
143,133
40,264,932
87,997

I m p o r t s of d i s t i l l e d l i q u o r s and w i n e s and
thereon
duties collected
f o r the m o n t h of J u l y 1 9 3 6
have been
isseek r e p o r t e d b y the C o m m i s s i o n e r of C u s t o m s as s h o w n in
the xsszaqsKXL f o l l o w i n g

statement:

«■WHO
June

J u ly

7 Months (Jan.

J u ly

im
|LLED LI&UORS (P r o o f G a llo n s ):
look in Customs Bonded Ware­
houses a t b egin n in g
•tal Imports (F ree and D u tia b le )
jail able fo r Consumption
ered in to Consumption (a )

»3*

3, 701,87 6
1 , 042,545

3*9<>4,083

3,522,644

7 2 4 ,7 9 7

523,349

4 ,7 4 4 ,4 2 1

4,688,880

4,045,993

9 8 1 ,5 3 5

9 8 4 ,7 8 4

432,715

4,222,560
6 ,6 0 8 ,3 7 7
10 , 830,937
7 , 022,926

jock in Customs Bonded W arehouses
3 ,7 5 7 ,2 0 9
It end
^ WINES (L iq u id G a llo n s ):
eok in Customs Bonded Warelouses a t b eg in n in g
,
jtal Imports (F ree end D u tia b le )
Sellable fo r Consumption
jtered in to Consumption (a )
o rted fr tn-frnot omff Custody—
look in Customs Bonded Ware­
houses a t end

1 , 637,508
1 2 1,859
1 ,7 5 9 ,3 6 7
1 9 7 ,9 5 5
TpfJT""

LING WINES (L iq u id G a llo n s):
look in Customs Bonded Ware­
houses a t b eg in n in g
jtal Imports (F ree and D u tia b le )
jsilable fo r Consumption
tered in to Consumption ( a )
■ported,^Crnm finst
nMg1fOdy —
ock in Customs Bonded Ware­
houses a t end

on L iquors

1 Outlay

ni. ft* In—

BBoditi es
II D uties C o lle c te d

3 ,7 0 1 ,8 7 6

3 ,5 9 1 ,7 5 0

3 , 757,209

3, 591,750

1 ,7 0 3 ,9 2 5
1 3 0 ,1 5 7

1,540,948
150,236
4, 691,184
145,801

1 , 607,096

1,314,384

1 , 766,588
1,031,481
2, 798,069
1 , 229^451

1,834,082
193,893
—

1 ,2 8 6 ,9 5 3
2 , 894,049

nl

1 , 559,000

1 , 637,508

1,5 4 1,9 4 5

1 , 559,000

1 , 541,945

216,919
15,095
232,014
30,398

234,481

288,091

2 3 2 ,724

1 1 ,4 3 5
246,916

6 ,3 3 3
2 9 4 ,4 2 4

103,360

325,712
73,587
399,299

2 9 ,9 9 5

1 2 ,3 5 3

127,343
/

105,634

336 ,0 8 4
l”1"

11,709

216,919

281,956

201,436

281,956

$ 2 , 443,007
167,409
168,958
1 0 0 ,5 5 1
.. 9 k S § 1 . -

$ 2, 046,321
1 8 0 ,4 5 5

$ 1 7 ,8 3 7 ,2 6 8

$ 17 , 846,362

201,436

3 9 9 ,8 1 7

I Duties C o lle c te d

4, 282,960
3,19 0 ,7 51
7 ,4 7 3 ,7 11
3 , 707,068
(4|8‘

■tfteftjCCfll Custems'-flmefa

|ES COLLECTED ON [stille d L iq u o rs
‘i l l Wines
a rk lin g Wines

Ju ly )
1935

____

1 ,4 8 5 ,9 0 9
583,233____

1 ,5 2 8 ,5 7 5

$ 2 , 660,359 $ 2 ,7 1 0 ,9 6 7

$2,299*274

$ 1 9 ,9 0 6 ,4 1 0

$ 1 9 ,9 9 6 ,6 9 9

28.920*093 29 «610» 547
$ 3 1 ,5 8 0 ,4 5 2 $ 3 2 ,1 2 1 ,5 1 4

2 7 ,4 1 2 ,1 1 9
$ 2 9 ,7 1 1 ,3 9 3

208, 317,804
$228,224,214

I M tP M a M l

»Gent
Including w ith d raw als fo r sh ip s u p p lie s and d ip lo m a tic u s e ,
s ^ n o f S t a t i s t i c s and H esearoh,

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
September

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

8,

1936.

RECEIPTS OP SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended.
Week ended September 4, 1936:
Philadelphia ....... ............................. .
689,881.20 fine ounces
San Francisco ........................... ............ 655,888.14
Denver
........................................... .
16,338.71 f
«
Total for week ended September 4, 1936 .............. 1,362,108.05 n
Total Receipts through September 4, 1936............ 99,470,050.50 n
SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended September 4, 1936:
Philadelphia .........................
New York ............................
San Francisco ........................
Denver •.. .................... ........
New Orleans ........... ................
Seattle ... «...........................
Total for week ended September 4, 1936 .
Total receipts through September 4, 1936

..
..

fine
165.55 M
___
I!
65.82

I

____

ir

___

ri

..
231.37
112,971,034.32

'*
*

ounces
tt
u
M
$
T1
tl

t!

RECEIPTS OF GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Imports
Week ended September 4, 1936:
$
10,349.12
Philadelphia
20,158,500.00
New York
1,280,756.25
San Francisco
33,372.07
Denver
12,648.84
New Orleans
Seattle
Total for week ended Sept. 4, 1936 $21,495,626.28

Secondary
$115,146.69
133,000.00
27,393.86
15,711.03
21,382.48
7,520.07
$320,154.13

New Domestic
$
1,025.78
294,500.00
1,378,320.82
522,835.06
58.34
603.935,50
$2,800,675.50

July
1936
DISTILLED l i q u o r s
(Proof Gallons):
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning ..... 3,701,876
Total Imports (Free
and dutiable)..... 1,042,545
Available for Consumption. .......... 4,744,421
Entered into Con­
981,535
sumption (a)«,.....
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at end .......... . 3,757,209
STILL WINES
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning..... 1,637,508
Total Imports (Free
121,859
and dutiable)......
Available for Consumption........... 1,759,367
Entered into Con197,955
sumption (a).......
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at end.......... . 1,559,000
SPARKLING WINES
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
216,919
at beginning.....
Total Imports (Free
15,095
and dutiable)......
Available for Con232,014
sumption.... ......
Entered into Con­
30,398
sumption (a)......-.
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
201.436
at end............
DUTIES COLLECTED ON
$2,399,817
Distilled Liquors
168,958
Still Wines
91.584
Sparkling Wines
Total Duties Collec. ted on Liquors
(a)

June
July
7 Months (Jan. - July)
1936_______ 1935__________ 1936_______ 1935

3,964,083

3,522,644

4,222,560

4,282,960

724,797

523,349

6,608,377

3,190,751

4,688,880

4,045,993

10,830,937

7,473,711

984,784

432,715

7,022,926

3,707,068

3,701,876

3,591,750

3,757,209

3,591,750

1,703,925

1,540,948

1,607,096

1,766,588

130,157

150,236

1,286,953

1,031,481

1,834,082

4,691,184

2,894,049

2,798,069

193,893

145,801

1,314,384

1,229,451

1,637,508

1,541,945

1,559,000

1,541,945

234,481

288,091

232,724

325,712

12,435

6,333

103,360

73,587

246,916

294,424

336,084

399,299

29-, 995

12,353

127,343

105,634

216.919

281.956

201.436

281.956

$2,443,007 $2,046,321 $17,837,268 $17,846,362
167,409
180,455
1,485,909
1,528,575
100.551______ 72.498______ 583.233
621,762

$2.660.359 $2.710.967

$2.299.274

$19,906.410 $19.996,699

Including withdrawals for ship supplies and diplomatic use

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Friday« September 11, 1936«____
9-9-36.

Press

Service
^°* 8-34

Imports of distilled liquors and wines and duties collected thereon
for the month of July, 1936, have been reported hy the Commissioner of
Customs as shown in the following statement:

The Comptroller of the Currency, J. F. T. O'Connor, with the
*

approval of Henry Morgenthau, Jr,, Secretary of the Treasury, has de­
signated Frank W. Shanley of San Francisco as Chief National Bank Examiner
for the Twelfth Federal Reserve District,

Mr, Shanley has had extensive

experience in hanking and business and for the past several years has been
assigned to the Twelfth Federal Reserve District as National Bank Examiner
with headquarters in San Francisco,

After receiving his commission as

National Bank Examiner in 1918, which was issued to him after he had success­
fully passed the regular examination, Mr, Shanley was offered and accepted a
more attractive position as

cashier with a national bank.

He has been

Acting Chief National Bank Examiner since the resignation of the Chief
National Bank Examiner in the early part of August.
Mr. Shanley received his commission today in Washington, where he
has been transacting business with Treasury officials.
San Francisco the latter part of the week.

00O 00

He will return to

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday, September 10, 1936.

Press Service
Ho. 8-*35

The Comptroller of the Currency, J.E.T. O ’Connor, with the approval of
Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, has designated Prank W. Shanley
of San Prancisco as Chief National Bank Examiner for the Twelfth Federal Reserve
District.

Mr. Shanley has had extensive experience in banking and business and

for the past several years has been assigned to the Twelfth Federal Reserve
District as National Bank Examiner with headquarters in San Prancisco.

After

receiving his commission as National Bank Examiner in 1918, which was issued to
him after he had successfully passed the regular examination, Mr. Shanley was
offered and accepted a more attractive position as cashier with a national bank.
He has been Acting Chief National Bank Examiner since the resignation of the
Chief National Bank Examiner in the early part of August.
Mr. Shanley received his commission today in Washington, where he has been
transacting business with Treasury officials.
the latter part of the week.
ooOoo

He will return to San Prancisco

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

September 10, 1936«

f

'

TO MR. FUSSELL

(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:

There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures on imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock,
under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during
the period from January 1 to August 29, 1936.
I

will appreciate it if you will adTise me as soon as this

tabulation has been released, as we have some urgent requests for
this information.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, kindly have 40
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

r-

IMPORTS /OF DOUGLAS FIR
PROVISIONS OF,

3 6

WESTERN HEMLOCK UND
CANADIAN TRADE AG:

•ing the period Jafcmry 1 to A

(Ppeliminery^FtgwW^T

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N. H.
Biassachuse tt s
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
San Francisco
Vermont
Washington

Sawed Timber and Lumber
Douglas • Western ; .Mixed Fir . .Total Fir
& Hemlock • & Hemlock
Hemlock %
Fir
(Bd. Ft.) • (Bd. Ft.)
* (Bd. Ft.)t (Bd. Ft.) .
55,563,870

22,536,822

258,116
7,738,553
4,249,170
10,270,500
57,998
10,362,074
42,415
5,022,325
10,135,202
19,597
274,995
656
370,001
6,788,468

98,049
2,143,486
399,005
95,064
5,072
14,808,584
*
1,573,972
3,138,900
•
**
89,225
185,465

20,788,085

—
2,958,707
•
17,829,378
*

-

98,888,777
39.6$
_____
356,160
2,958,707
9,876,039
4,648,175
10,365,364
43,070
25,170,658
42,415
24,425,675
13,274,102
19,597
274,995
656
459,226
6,973,933

( P r . p w * * r - DtrtSlSTôFstatlstlee and BMwSefi, BUi— u»«t»gagtoiB«)

■•? rd-^t

£
I

-c -

._
C j i ^ U
-^-^*1 . ' ^ n

..■QuxlJL^
.,i-^{0>

5V

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures
for the imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock, under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from
January 1 to August 29, 1936, and the percentage that such imports
bear to the total allowable under the quota, asfollows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday, September 10, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-36

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock* under the quota provisions of the
Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from January

1

to August 29, 1936,

and the percentage that such imports hear to the total allowable under the quota,
as follows:

Customs Districts
TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N.H.
Massachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
San Francisco
Vermont
Washington

Douglas
Fir
(Bd. Ft.)
55,563,870

258,116
**■-*-•7,732,553
4,249,170
10,270,300
37,998
10,362,074
42,415
5,022,325
10,135,202
19,597
274,995
656
370,001
6,788,468

Sawed Timber & Lumber
Western
Mixed Fir
Hemlock
& Hemlock
(Bd. Ft.)
(Bd. Ft.)
22,536,822
20,788,085

98,049
2,143,486
399,005
95,064
5,072
14,808,584
— — — ~
1,573,972
3,138,900
-*
— —
« —

——

_

89,225
185,465

# *•
M
2,958,707
« *, M
ate
— —
M
rt *- M> — —
17,829,378
— ~
_
~

_ _

_ _ ___ _ _
» » » M M
---------

Total Fir
& Hemlock
(Bd. Ft.)
98,888,777
39.6i

356,165
2,958,707
9,876,039
4,648,175
10,365,364
43,070
25,170,658
42,415
24,425,675
13,274„102
19,597
274,995
656
459,226
6,973,933

The Secretary of the Treasury,
Washington, D, C *
Sir:
Complying with your request, I submit below a resume4^ of Treasury
Department law enforcement work for the fiscal year 1936:
The outstanding achievement of the year was the virtually complete
success of operations against alcohol smugglers*
At the end of the fiscal
year, for the first time in sixteen years, not one foreign smuggling craft
m s off the Atlantic Coast of the United States* Since the end of the fis­
cal year fifiS hovering vessel^ appeared for a short time but at present the
Coast again is completely clear of smugglers*
The success of the campaign was due to the cooperative action of
friendly foreign governments in restricting the shipment of alcohol and
to the effective coordinated work of Treasury Department agencies, partic­
ularly Coast Guard, Customs and Alcohol Tax Unit*

enforcer
against othi
Other highlights of law enforcement work during the year were:
For the first time in many years the amount of counterfeit money
in circulation has been reduced*
Border seizures of liquor and of general merchandise decreased
but seizures of narcotics involved in smuggling operations increased*
However, the quantity of narcotics seized within the United States,
under the Harrison aot, declined*
The number of stills seized in operations against illicit productio
of liquor remained virtually stationary. However, the quantity of mash re­
ported in connection with still seizures shov/ed a notable decline and the
number of convictions showed a gratifying increase*

The Secretary of the Treasury,
Washington, D* C*
Sir:
Complying with your request, I submit below a resume^ of Treasury
Department law enforcement work for the fiscal year 1936:
The outstanding achievement of the year was the virtually complete
success of operations against alcohol smugglers*
At the end of the fiscal
year, for the first time in sixteen vears. not one foreicm firmicrr'Hru»* ft-ra-Pt

Following
Secretary Morgenthau by
Secretary

in m a t t e r s

is

the

text

of a

report

s u b m i t t e d to

H a r o l d N. G r a v e s ,A s s i s t ant

relating

to

law enforcement:

to the-

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

\m RELEASE,

MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
jsundav, September 13. 1906______
foZlO~36,

p ress service
No, 3-37

Following is the text of a report submitted to Secretary Morgenthan by
Harold N. Graves, Assistant to the Secretary in matters relating to law enforcement:

The Secretary of the Treasury,
Washington, D. C,

Sir:
Complying with your request, I submit below a resume of Treasury Department
lav/ enforcement work for the fiscal year 1936:
The outstanding achievement of the year was the virtually complete success

of op orations against alcohol smugglers. At the end of the fiscal year, for the
first time in sixteen years, not one foreign smuggling craft was off the Atlantic
Coast of the United States,
Since the end of the fiscal year one hovering vessel
appeared for a short tim- but at present the Coast again is completely clear of
smugglers.
The success of the campaign was due to the cooperative action of friendly
poreign governments in restricting the shipment of alcohol and to the effective
coordinated work of Treasury Department agencies, particularly Coast Guard, Customs
and Alcohol Trot Unit.
Other highlights of law enforcement work during the year were:
For the first time in many years the amount of counterfeit money in
circulation has been reduced.
• Border seizures of liquor and of general merchandise decreased but
seizures of narcotics involved in smuggling operations increased.
However, the quantity of narcotics seized within the United States, under
hu:-Harrison act, declined.
The number of stills seized in operations against illi cit production of
hquor remained virtually stationary. However, the quantity of mash reported in
Pynricction with still seizures showed a notable decline and the number of conactions showed a .gratifying increase.

Following are "brief citations indicating the status of law enforcement
pork:
Alcohol Smuggling
The number of foreign vessels listed as alcohol carriers, reported
off the Atlantic Coast at any time during each of the months
listed, was as follows:
Month

Fiscal Year
1936

Fiscal year
1935
16
15
19
16

July, 1934
August
September
October
November
December
January, 1935
February
March
April
May
June
Total

July, 1935

12
14

8
10

21
22
18

14

9
January, 1936

22

8
5
5

25
29
31
13
247

2
2
3
92

During July, 1936, there were no hovering vessels and during August only
:h has since withdrawn.
Counterfeiting
The amount of counterfeit currency seized by the Secret Service Division
in each of the last four fiscal years was as follows:
Year
1933
1934
1935
1936

$

Notes

Coins

921,499
1 ,214,279
1 ,418,464
728,750

$72,814
77,959
74,847
67,556'

Total
$ 994,313
1,292,238
1,493,311
796,306

The sharp reduction in counterfeit currency seized during the last year
®ay be attributed in large measure to the arrest and conviction of the notorious
"Count1’ Lustig and his plate maker, William Watts, after years of vigilant work
on the part of Secret Service agents. Approximately 400 persons had been arrested
as. passers* of counterfeit notes, from plate« prepared by Watts, prior to his
apprehension.

Customs Seizures
The number of liquor seizures for violation of customs laws declined from
5,226 in 1935 to 3,252 in 1936, and the quantity of alcohol seized from 138,040
gallons "to 101,604 gallons.
The number of automobiles seized in connection with
liquor smuggling dropped from 303 to 139* the number'of boats from 52 to 37 and
the number of planes from two to one.
The number of narcotics seizures for violation of custom? laws increased .-frond*'
239, valued at $65,663, to 310, valued at $110,129* and the numbef of -automobiles
seized in connection with narcotics smuggling from 91 to 121.
The number of merchandise, seizures decreased from 15,434, valued at $481,816,
in 1935, to 11,079, valued at $589,156, in 1936. There were 363 automobiles, 37
boats and two planes seized for other than liquor violations.
In view of the large quantities of narcotics discovered on vessels from the
Orient vigorous action is now being taken to deal with this situation.
Alcohol Tax Cases
The following preliminary statistics picture the noteworthy improvement in
alcohol tax law enforcement during the past years
fiscal Year
1935________ 1936

Seizures and Arrests
Illicit stills
Av crape capacity (gallons)
Distilled spirits (gallons)
Mash (gallons)
Automobiles
Boats
Appraised value of property seized
Persons arrested
Court results
Persons convicted
Sentences of imprisonment imposed
Length of sentences (days)
Number of fines imposed
Amount of fines

15,712
15,727
182
166
863--,375
794,073
21,373,107
14,610,439
4,837
5,104
25
19
$5,632,145 ' $4,354,945
31,625
32,075
15,108
13,166
4,071,232
8,562
$3,013,851

20,721
17,321
5,759,571
11,907
$4,065,096

Collections of internal revenue from liquor taxes increased from $411,000,000
in 1935 to $505,000,000 in 1936.
Harrison Act. Narcotics Cas of
The number of violations of the Harrison Act reported dwmin ’ 1936 were 5,859,
compared with 6,071 in 1935.
There were 3,333 arrests made under this Act in
Complete data for previous years are not available*

The quantity of narcotics seized under the Harrison Act in 1936 was less than
talf of the quantity seized durihg the previous year, when seizures of smoking opium
here unusually high. The following statistics show the quantities in ounces of drugs
beized in each of the important categories for the last three years!
Drugs
Opium, raw
Opium:, • smoking
Opium, other
Mcrohine
Heroin
Cocaine
Other

1934

1935

252
1,185
Si
386
1,178
205
3
3,230

411
3,727
27
830
1,740
30

Tax Evasion

12
6,777

1936
1,266
1,115
27
242
601
16
13
3,280

0;as es

Intelligence Unit of the Bureau of
Investigation of income tax cases by the !
;rnal Revenue resulted in convictions in 43 cases involving £»5 individuals and
The investigations, including many
iittals in nine cases involving 10 persons.
cases in which criminal prosecutions were not recommended, resulted in recommenda­
tion for assessment of additional taxes and penalties aggregating $31,033,499. The
corresponding figure for 1935 was $20,212,161.
Frosecutions in a number of cases also resulted in fines and the costs of
investigations “being covered into the Treasury.
General
The six law enforcement agencies of the Treasury Department
Coast Guard,
[Secret Service, Customs, Narcotics, and the Alcohol Tax and Intelligence Units of
[the Bureau of Internal Revenue - cooperated to great advantage in a number of lines
of work, in addition to the original coordination program in combatting, alcohol
snuggling.
Notable was the increased, activity of the Coast Guard Air force. During the
pear Coast Guard pilots, on patrol and special duty, were highly effective in law
enforcement work, in addition to their 7/ork in protecting life and property at sea.
Four hundred and two stills, located and reported by Coast Guard pilots, were
subsequently seized and destroyed. Planes continued active in discovering and.
[identifying vessels and aircraft suspected as carriers of contraband.
Indicating the
increased activities are the following figures, which cover plane operations, botn
[in protection of life and property at sea and law enforcement duties!
Coast Guard Aviation

Miles cruised
Hours in air

Fiscal Years
1934_________ 1935_________ 1936
219,572
527,756
837,696
2,752
5,709
8,958
Yours respectfully,

/Signed/

Harold N. Graves,
Assistant to the Secretary.

It« O 0 » t 80.ÍA3B,
Tridas. September 11. H 8 t»

9/ll/s¿
Secretary of ti» Trsasnry Ifergaath»» toter MBOwaote ti» subscription
figures and tie tesi» of allotment ter tie eeeh offering of 8-5/* portent

Reports reentre* fro* tie federe! Seeerre bonis show tiot aubserip-

tions ter tie »si offering, »lei was for *400,000.000, or tior»boats,
aggregeto *5,134,000,000.

Subscriptions in eaounts up to end including

*5,0 0 0 sere allotted in full and those in aneante orar *6 ,0 0 0 were
allotted ? percent, bat not lees than *5,000 on any one subscription.
Preliminary reports of exchange subscriptions, in paynent of «bici
Treasury Rotee of Sortes 0-195*. »taring September 15, 1986, ser#
tontera*, inatento tint prnotteolly nil of tio »taring notoe will be
I
exchanged ft* the new bonds«
further detalle ee to subscriptlone and allotment» will be announced
final reporta ara reaoirad fro m tio foderai Beserra banks.

-

5

Four hundred and two stills, located and reported by Coast
Guard pilots, were subsequently seized and destroyed* Planes con­
tinued active in discovering and identifying vessels and aircraft
suspected as carriers of contraband. Indicating the increased ac­
tivities are the following figures, which cover plane operations,
both in protection of life and property at sea and law enforcement
duties:
Coast Guard Aviation
Fiscal Years
1 9 3 4 ______ 1935______ 1956
Miles cruised
Hours in air

219,572
2,752

527,756
5,709

837,696
8,958

Yours respectfully,

Harold N* Graves,
Assistant to the Secretary*

Harrison Act Narcotics Cases
The number of violations of the Harrison Act reported during 1936
were 5,859, as compared with 6,071 in 1935. There were 3,333 arrests made
under this Act in 1933. Complete data for previous years are not available
The quantity of narcotics seized under the Harrison Act in 1936
was less than half of the quantity seized during the previous year, when
seizures of smoking opium were unusually high. The following statistics
show the quantities in ounces of drugs seized in each of the important
categories for the last three years:
Drugs
Opium, raw
Opium, smoking
Opium, other
Morphine
Heroin
Cocaine
Other

1934

1935

1936

252
1,185
21
386
1,178
205
3
3,230

411
3,727
27
830
1,740
30
12
6,777

1,266
1,115
27
242
601
16
13
3,280

Tax Evasion Cases
Investigation of income tax cases by the Intelligence Unit of The
Bureau of Internal Revenue resulted in convictions in 43 oases involving
55 individuals and acquittals in nine cases involving 10 persons. The in­
vestigations, including many cases in which criminal prosecutions were not
recommended, resulted in recommendation for assessment of additional taxes
and penalties aggregating $31,033,499. The corresponding figure for 1935
was $20,212,161#
Prosecutions in a number of cases also resulted in fines and the
costs of investigations being covered into the Treasury.
General
The six law enforcement agencies of the Treasury Department Coast Guard, Secret Service, Customs, Narcotics, andjbhe Alcohol Tax and
Intelligence Units of the Bureau of Internal Revenue cooperated to great
advantage in a number of lines of work, in addition to the original co­
ordination program in combatting alcohol smuggling.
Notable was the increased activity of the Coast Guard Air force.
During the year Coast Guard pilots, on patrol and special duty, were
highly effective in law enforcement work, in addition to their work in
protecting life and property at sea.

3
Customs Seizures

clined
seized
seized
number

The number of liquor seizures for violation of customs laws de­
from 5,226 in 1935 to 3,252 in 1936, and the quantity of alcohol
from 138,040 gallons to 101,604 gallons. The number of automobiles
in connection with liquor smuggling dropped from 303 to 139, the
of boats from 52 to 37 and the number of planes from two to one.

The number of narcotics seizures for violation of customs laws
increased from 239, valued at $65,663, to 310, valued at $110,129, and
the number of automobiles seized in connection with narcotics smuggling
from 91 to 121.
The number of merchandise seizures decreased from 15,434, valued
at $481,816, in 1935, to 11,079, valued at $589,156,in 1936. There were
363 automobiles, 37 boats and two planes seized for other than liquor
violations.
In view of the large quantities of narcotics discovered on vessels
from the Orient vigorous action is now being taken to deal with this
situation.
Alcohol Tax Cases
The following preliminary statistics picture the noteworthy im­
provement in alcohol tax law enforcement during the past year:

Seizures and Arrests
Illicit stills
Average capacity (gallons)
Distilled spirits (gallons)
Mash (gallons)
Automobiles
Boats
t
Appraised value of property
seized
Persons arrested

Fiscal Year
1935
1936
15,712
182
863,375
21,373,107
4,837
25

15,727
166
794,073
14,610,439
5,104
19

$5,632,145
31,625

$4,354,945
32,075

15,108

20,721

13,166
4,071,232
8,562
$3,013,851

17,321
5,759,571
11,907
$4,065,096

Court results
Persons convicted
Sentences of imprisonment
imposed
Length of sentences (days)
Number of fines imposed
Amount of fines

Collections of internal revenue from liquor taxes increased from
$411,000,000 in 1935 to $505,000,000 in 1936.

Following are brief citations indicating the status of lawenforcement work:
Alcohol Smuggling
The number of foreign vessels listed as alcohol carriers,
reported off the Atlantic Coast at any time during each
of the months listed, was as follows:
Fiscal year
1935

Month

16
15
19
16
21
22
18
22
25
29
31
13
247

July, 1934
August
September
October
November
December
January , 1935
February
March
April
May
June
Total

Fiscal Year
1936
14
12
14
8
10
9
8
5
5
2
2
3
92

July, 1935

January, 1936

During July, 1936, there were no hovering vessels and during
August only Am »* which have* since withdrawn.
Counterfeiting
The amount of counterfeit currency seized by ‘the Secret Service
Division in each of the last four fiscal years Was as follows:
Year
1933
1934
1935
1936

Notes
$

921,499
1,214,279
1,418,464
728,750

Total

Coins
$72,814
77,959
74,847
67,556

$

994,313
1,292,238
1,493,311
796,306

The sharp reduction in counterfeit currency seized during the
last year may be attributed in large measure to the arrest and convic­
tion of the notorious "Count" Lustig and his plate maker, William Watts
after years of vigilant work on the part of Secret Service agents. Ap­
proximately 400 persons had been arrested as passers of counterfeit
notes, from plates prepared by Watts, prior to his apprehension.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*
Friday, September 11, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-38

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today announced the subscription
figures and the basis of allotment for the cash offering of 2-3/4 percent
Treasury Bonds of 1956-59.
Reports received from the Federal Reserve banks show that subscriptions
for the cash offering, which was for $400,000,000, or thereabouts, aggregate
$5,134,000,000.

Subscriptions in amounts up to and including $5,000 were

allotted in full and those in amounts over $5,000 were allotted 7 percent, but
not less than $5,000 on any one subscription.
Preliminary reports of exchange subscriptions, in payment of which Treasury
Notes of Series D-1936, maturing September 15, 1936, were tendered, indicate
that practically all of the maturing notes will be exchanged for the new bonds.
Further details as to subscriptions and allotments will be announced
when final reports are received from the Federal Reserve banks.
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Press Service
No. 8-39

EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, September 11, 1936.

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes, under the quota provisions of the
Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to August 29, 1936, and the
percentage that such imports hear to the totals allowable under the quota pro­
visions, as followsî

Customs Districts
TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

Cattle 700
Pounds or
More
(Head)
143,361
92.0#

:Dairy Cows
:700 Pounds
t Or More
i (Head)
4,008

:
:
iCream
i(Cal.)

! White or
¡Irish Seed
» Potatoes
; (Pounds).

8,382

20,671,843
45.9$

20 . 0#

11
52,500

27,325
3,537
21,853
231
69
562
6,764
39,287
906
1,328
3,133

92,650
180
2,147,915

,

1 780,374
144,510
31

22
494
290

384
2,250

17,209

493
4,008

123,010

8,284
1,244,375

7,517
7,075
5,702
57
20,351

(a) The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.

86.000
8,382

20,671,843

&
Secretary Morenthau

today made

the

following

statement :
In a press
National

Committee

newspapers

this

and

a

i s s u e d b y the

given vide

statement
"Secretary

has

release

publicity

Republican

in t o d a y ' s

appears:

the

of

n e p h e w -on t h e p a y r o l l

of

Treasury^Morgenthau

th e A g r i c u l t u r a l a d j u s t m e n t

A d m i n i s t r â t i o n .”
'-‘■'his s t a t e m e n t

*

is u n t r u e .

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes, under
the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the
pdriod January 1 to August 29, 1936, and the percentage that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions,
as follows:

Customs Districts

♦
• Cattle
• Under 175
: Pounds
(Head)

TOTAL IMPOSTS
Per Cent of Quota
THOM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
11 Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

(a)

(a)

: Cattle 700
: Pounds or
: Mord
: (Head)
143,361
92.0#

:
:
: Cream
: (Gal.)

: White Or
: Irish Seed
: Potatoes
: (Pounds)

4,008
2 0 .0#

8,382
mm

20,671,843
45.9$

1
11
•
800
38

11
•
mm
60
•*
26
**
—

•
52,500
•
92,650
180
2,147,915
•
1,780,374
144,510

: Dairy Cows
: 700 Pounds
: Or More
: (Head)

27,325
3,537
21,853
231
69
562
6,764
39,287
906
1,328
3,133
22
494
290
17.209

31
•
•*
384
2,250
•
493

8,284
-

580
•
1,244,375
86,000

123,010

4,006

8,382

20,671,845

7,517
7,075
5,702
57

•
•

—
•

20,351

-

-

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled

•
1
•
•
•

•
15,122,759

—
-

'0RTS\T5P CATTLE UNDER QUOTA PROVI
^V.JJANADIAN TRADE AMEWf^

anuary 1 t o August 15 , I 331
nary F igu res

D uring th e

Customs D i s t r i c t s

TOTAL IMPORTS
P ercen t o f Quota

OP THE

C a ttle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head}
(* )

C a ttle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head}

D airy Cows
700 Pound8
Or More
(Head)

1 4 1 ,2 0 0

3,606
lö cv ^

PROM CANADA
B u ffa lo
Chicago
Dakota
D uluth A S u p erior
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Mas sachus e t t s
M ichigan
M innesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
P h ila d e lp h ia
St* Lawrence
Vermont
W ashington
T o ta l from Canada
PROM MEXICO
A rison a
El Paso
San A ntonio
San D iego
T o ta l from Mexico
(a )

2 6 ,3 8 6

1

3*502

-

2 1,8 3 2
23I

11

¿7

702

562
- - -

38

6,642

«

3 8 ,8 5 5
306
1 ,3 2 8
3 * 10 2
22

423

«

m

31
.
m

230
1 6 ,5 8 6

311
2 ,1 0 8
404

1 2 1 ,3 4 0

3,6 0 6

7*151
6 ,3 5 0
5*702

m

— ---------------------------------------- §2___________

13,860

The q uota on t h i s c l a s s o f c a t t l e has been f i l l e d .
................... ..i w n »»mw»wr

, Bureau o f Customs]

m
m

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

September 11, 1936»

TO MR. FUSSELL
(Room 2Ô9 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release shoeing
imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes under the quota pro­
visions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period from
January 1 to August 29, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

Sta

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM EOR THE PRESS

September

14 ,

1936«

RECEIPTS OE SILVER 3Y THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES;
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended September 11, 1936:
Philadelphia...... .......................,........
840,745-26 fine ounces
ri
n
San Francisco......................................
438,667-29
it
it
Denver...... ......................................
10 «202-87
fl
«
Total for week ended September 11, 1936............
1,289,615,42
ti
it
Total receipts through September 11, 1936.......... 100,759,665,92
SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended September 11, 1936:
Philadelphia..................... , ............... .
- - - _
New York.. *....... ............... ................
2,444.65 fine ounces
San Francisco...... ........ .......................
^
it
it
Denver.............. ...............................
59.58
New Orleans........................... .......... .
Seattle ............................................
„ „ _ „
»I
IT
3,504,23
Total for week ended September 11, 1936............
It . II
Total receipts through September 11, 1936.......... 112,974,538.55
RECEIPTS OF GOLD 3Y THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
New
Week ended September 11, 1936:
__ Imports_______ Secondary
Domestic
Philadelphia................ ..... . $
13,661.24 $~83,938.91 $ '
765,55
New Y o r k .... .....................
6,641,200.00
82,700.00
38,300.00
San Francisco........... .........
480,473.99
25,519*20 2,340,362.26
Denver..... .......................
13,313.63
12,282.79
568,425.28
New Orleans...................... *
273.85
8,542.59
134.95
Seattle................ .......... .
10.298.94
405.151.21
Total for week ended September 11,.. $7,148,922.71 $223,282.43 $3,353,139.25

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

POR IMMEDIATE REESASE,
Saturday, September 12, 1936*

Press Service
No,. 8- 40

Secretary Morgenthaii today made the following statement:.
In a press release issued by the Republican National
Committee and given wide publicity in today*s newspapers this
statement appears?:
HSecretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau, Jr, has a
nephew on the payroll of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration*
This statement is untrue*.
ooOoo

(T. B.

)

TAX ON UNJUST
(WINDFALL TAX)
TITLE III OF TEE RSV2NÜS ACT OF 1936

Extension of Time for Filing Return»
and Faying Tax

TREASURY DEPAimSENT
Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Washington, 0. Q*

TO COLLECTORS OF XlTSfAh R I V W 1
AND OTHERS CONCIENEO:
The first paragraph of Treasury Decision 4689, approved
August 26, 1936 (Int. Rev. Bull. XV-35, 14) Is hereby amended
to provide as follows:
"Pursuant to the provisions of section 53 and sec­
tion 503 of the Revenue Act of 1936, an extension of
time for such period as may be necessary, but not later
than December 15, 1936, is hereby granted for the fil­
ing of returns and paying the tax under Title 111 of
the Revenue Act of 1936, for any taxable year ended on
or before August 31, 1936."
This Treasury Decision is issued under the authority
prescribed by sections 53, 62, and 503 of the Revenue Act of
1936.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Approved:

Secretary of the Treasury.

Y

For Publication
Federal Register Series No.

immediate release

Secretary Morgenthau today approved a Treasury Decision granting an
extension of time for payment of the tax under Title III of the
Hevenue Act of 1935 (the unjust enrichment tax) from September 15 to
December 15 of this year, A previous Decision, dated August 26, 1935,
extended the time for filing returns but did not extend the date of payment.
The effect of the decision approved today is to relieve taxpayers of
per cent interest from September 15 to the date of payment•
The Decision follows;

6

C O M P O S IT IO N

IN T ER ES T -B EA R IN G
In

1930

1931

I932

P U B LIC
Per C e n t

1933

O F

D EBT O U T S T A N D IN G

of T o t a l

1934

1935

1936

1937

PER
C EN T

PER
CENT

90

90

80

80

70

70

60

60

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

1930

1931

1933

Note: September, 193b Figures Represent
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury
Division o f Research and Statistics

August

1934
Figures

os Adjusted

1935

1936

1937

for September IS Financing
B -S

0-A

-1

OF

A V E R A G E LENGTH OF M A T U R IT Y
IN T ER EST-BEA R IN G
P U B L IC DEBT
Q u a rte rly , 1930 to 1936

Note

E xclu siv e o f C on sols, P o s ta l S a v in g s, U .S. S a v in g s B o n d s , A d ju s t e d S e r v ic e
B o n d s a n d s p e c ia l is s u e s to G o v e rn m e n t a g e n c ie s a n d t r u s t f u n d s .
* Aug. 31;-a d ju ste d to give e ffe c t to S e p t 15 fin a n c in g .

Office of the Secretary of the Treasury
Division of Research and Statistics

r-

63

Table III

Interest-Bearing Public Del)t by Maturity Classes, 1933 to 193&.
with Liberty Bonds Shown Separately

•
June 30*
Maturity
(in years) I
1933
'
.. —*—

* June 30*
;
193^

* June 30t
;
1935

l
L

June 30*

1936

•
! August 31,
! 1936 1 /

(In millions of dollars)
Liberties

8,201

6,3*46

1.335

Less than 1
1 - 5
5-15
15 and over

3.305

3.78*4

*4,379
1.3*1
3.913

3.89>+
5.755
6,321
3.090

Total

21,179

25,1406

w»f

8,366

14,175
9,559

6,877
5.885

JLÆ3.

3.61*2
10,393
8.593
8.779

26,2147

30,960

31,1*07

9,**27

Percentage Distribution
—

Liberties

38.7

25*0

5.1

Less than 1
1 - 5
5-15
15 and over

15*6
20.7
6*5
18.5

15.3
22.6
2*U9
12.2

lU.14
31.9
22.14

25.2

Total

100*0

100.0

100*0

100.0

26.2

13.5
30.9
30.U

—
11.6
33.1
27.1*

JM
100.0

Treasury D e p a r t m e n t, Division of Research and Statistics, September 12, 193o*

Adjusted to give effect to September 15 financing»

Note*

Bxclusive of Consols, Postal Savings, United States Savings, and
Adjusted Service Bonds, and of special issues to governmental agencies
end trust funds»

Table 11

Interest-Bearing Public Debt by Maturity Classes,
1933 to 1936

Maturity
(in years)

5 June 30»
:
1933

*
;

June 30»

1934

1
!
_»

June 30.
*935
--

5
;
*

June 30.

1936

* August 311
; 1 9361 /
•
_..

(In millions of dollars)
Less than 1
1 - 5
5-15
15 and over

3.305

Total

21,179

4,379

9,5*2

3.913

3 .89H
10 ,16s
8.25U

3.781*
9.701
6,877
5.885

u .175
9.55?
9.^7
7.819

3 .6U2
10,393

25 ,Uo 6

26,2^7

30.9*0

3 1 .U07

13.5
30.?
30.4
25.2

11.6
33*i

..?.7t2

100.0

100.0

^ ¡m

*,593
,*,»,713.

Percentage Distribution
Less than 1
1 - 5
5-15
15 and over

15.6
20.7
U5.2
JL*i5

Total

100.0

15.3

Uo.o
32.5

100.0

l^.u

37.0
26.2
100.0

27.4

Treasury Department, Division of Research and Statistics, September 12, 1935*

l/

Adjusted to give effect to September 15 financing.

Note:

Exclusive of Consols, Postal Savings, United States Savings, and
Adjusted Service Bonds, and of special issues to governmental agencies
and trust funds.

Table I

Average Length of Maturity of Interest-Bearing Public Debt
Quarterly, 193° ~ ^93^

With Liberty and Panama
Canal Bonds Computed to
Date of Actual Call
Years
:
Months

Month
Ended

With Liberty and Panama
Canal Bonds Computed to
Original Maturity Date
_ Years
|
Months

Dec.

1929

S

1

li

3

Mar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

1930
1930
1930
1930

7
7
7
7

10
9

11
10
10
10

1
11
10
6

Mar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

1931
1931
1931
1931

7
7
S
g

k

10
10
11
10

O
g
3

10

Mar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

1932
1932
1932
1932

70
O

10

3

Mar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

1933
1933
1933
1933

6

r
O
r
O
5

5
0

0

6

7
g
if
0
r
O
11
g

r

6

9
9
g

6
1
11

2
11
10
2

g
g
g
g

1
0
1
If
7
g
7

7

Mar. 193^
June 193U
Sept. 193U
Dec. 193^

5r
D

6

7
If
3

6

b

7
7
7
7

Mar.
June
Sent.
Dec.

1935
1935
1935
1935

7
g
g
g

7
7
9
7

g
g
g
g

Mar.
June
Aug.

1936
1936
1936 1 /

g
9
9

11

g

li

3
g

9
9

3

Hote;

\J

11
9
9
7

s

Exclusive of Consols, Postal Savings, U, S. Savings Bonds,
Adjusted Service Bonds, and special issues to Government
agencies and trust funds.

Adjusted to give effect to September 15 financing.

Secretary Mergenthau - 9/lU/36 - 3

A further consideration that must not he ignored in interpreting
the lengthening of maturities during the last two years is the fact that
the process of lengthening the average maturity is partly a race against
timet The maturity of an unchanged debt becomes one year shorter each
year. Hence, the increase that has been accomplished is a net increase \
in addition to that needed merely to compensate for the lapse of
As may be seen in Tables II and III, In which the public aeot
is analyzed by maturity classes, the largest absolute and percentage
increase has taken place in obligations maturing in between one and
five years, a classification which now includes nearly one-third of the
interest-bearing public debt, with the exclusions already noted. This
fact is of considerable significance, for if conditions remain substan­
tially as favorable as they are now, we will be able to refund this
large fraction of the public debt on far better terms than were possible
even a year ago«
Between June 30* 3.933 a&dpresent time, we have reduced the
percentage of the debt maturing in less than one year from 15*6 to
11*6« and we have increased the percentage maturing in 15 years or
over from 18*5 to 27*9 » The medium-term debt, maturing in 5 to 15
years, now constitutes 2J*k percent of the total, as compared with
percent, inclusive of Liberty bonds, and 6*5 percent exclusive
of the Liberty bonds, on June 30» 3.933»
5* The existing distribution of the interest-bearing public debt
by maturity classes is now being given special study with a view to
the recommendation of desirable changes in distribution in the light
of the requirements of the Social Security Act, the statutory Sinking
Fund, and the needs of governmental trust funds, as well as general
considerations of sound fiscal policy.

Attachments

Secretary Morgenthau - 3/lb/^S - 2

in such deposits that had resulted from the enormous reduction of hank
loans*
(Between the end of 1929 and the end of 1932# total member
hank deposits had declined hy more than $9 billions*) Bank purchases
of Government securities had the effect of directly increasing the
total volume of hank deposits; and short-term obligations were greatly
preferred hy hanking institutions to longer-term securities* Longerterm bonds with high—coupon rates* moreover, hy appealing to institu­
tional and individual investors, would have tended to absorb savings
that might otherwise he made available for industry. These considerat­
i o n s in favor of a large use of short-term securities appear to have
been justified; Between June 30# 1933 end December 3^» 193^* member
bank holdings of Government securities increased by a little more than
$3 billions, and their total demand deposits by about $3 »8 billions.
Narrower financial considerations also dictated a large reliance
upon short-term issues during the calendar years 1933 end 193^» *
Interest rates, though declining, were maintained at relatively high
levels during 1933 and the early months of I93 U because of a variety
of uncertainties arising mainly out of foreign developments, uncer­
tainties that made for erratic movements* In September 1933* for
example, the average yield on all long-term IT* S* Treasury bonds was
3*20 percent; by December it had moved -up to 3*53 percent; by May 193^*
it had fallen to 3*01 percent, only to rise again to 3*20 percent in
September 193 H* Further, the large-scale financing of the recovery and
relief program had to be undertaken concurrently with the enormous
volume of Liberty bond refunding, refunding that was highly desirable,^
nevertheless, because of the high-coupon rates or tax-exemption priyi^
leges of the Liberty bond issues* With fundamental factors giving
promise of a substantial decline in interest rates, it l a s ^ m s e policy,
therefore, to resort very substantially to short-term financing during
the first two years of the present Administration*

3.
(gince the end of 193H, a very substantial increase has taken
place in the average length of maturity of the interest-bearing public
debt* The August 3 1 , 1936 average, adjusted to give effect to the
September 15 financing, is 9 years and 8 months, as compared with 7
years and 7 months at the end of I93 U. This increase in average matur­
ity is the more striking because it has been accompanied by a pronounced
reduction in the interest rates paid by the Treasury* The average yield
on long-term Treasury bonds was 3*66 percent in 1932 # 3*3^ percent in
1933, and 3*10 percent in 193^. In 1935 and 1936# no Treasury bonds
were offered to yield more than 2.875 percent to the earliest call date.
Just over $5 billions of Treasury bonds were issued carrying a coupon
rate of only 2*75 percent; $2,6ll millions carried a coupon rate of
2.875 percent; and $211 millions of 3 percent bonds of a previous issue
were sold at auction to yield an average of about 2.6H percent*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
IN T E R

O F FIC E

C O M M U N IC A T IO N

date

TO

Secrets

FROM

Mr* Haas

Subjects

**

September lU, 1936

than

Maturity of Public Debt

1* The accompanying chart and Table I portray the average length
of maturity of the interest-bearing public debt at the end of each
quarter from December 3 1 , 1929 to August 3 1 , 1936, with the figures for
the latter date adjusted to give effect to the September 15 financing*
Tables II and III show the interest-bearing public debt by maturity
classes at the end of the fiscal years 1933
193^ inclusive, and on
August 3 1 * 1936# with the figures for the latter date adjusted to give
effect to the September 15 financing*
Because of the great volume (approximately $8*3 billions) of highcoupon or fully tax-exempt Liberty end Panama Canal bonds called for
redemption in the fiscal years 193^ and 1933 » i't has seemed desirable
to portray the changes in the average length of maturity with the matur­
ity of the latter computed as of the date of actual call as well as the
date of original maturity, in the chart and Table I; and to show the
maturity classes with the Liberty bonds segregated, as well as dis­
tributed with the other obligations, in Tables II and III* To avoid
undue complexity, the Consols, Postal Savings, United States Savings,
and Adjusted Service bonds, and special issues to governmental agencies
and trust funds, have been excluded from the computations*
2* At the close of the calendar year 1931» the average length of
final maturity of the interest-bearing public debt, with the exclusions
noted, was 10 years and 10 months* During the next 2j calendar years,
the average length of final maturity fell almost steadily, reaching a
low of 7 years and U months at the end of March 193^* At this date,
the average maturity was only 5 years and 7 months, if the actual call
dates of the Liberty and Panama Canal bonds be regarded as their matur­
ity dates* Between September 1931 and June 1933* Federal financing was
confined exclusively to notes, bills, and certificates* During the
calendar year 193^» the average length to final maturity of the public

.arge use of
short-term rather than long-term securities for the Federal financing
of the calendar years 1933 sad 193^« Monetary considerations consti­
tuted one of these* It waé^highly desirable to increase the aggregate
volume of bank deposits in order to compensate for the drastic deflection

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, September 14, 1936,

Press Service
No, 8-41

Secretary Morgenthau today approved a Treasury Decision granting an ex­
tension of time for payment of the tax under Title III of the Revenue Act of 1936
(the unjust enrichment tax) from September 15 to December 15 of this year.

A

previous Decision, dated August 26, 1936, extended the time for filing returns
but did not extend the date of payment.
today is to relieve taxpayers of

6

The effect of the decision approved

per cent interest from September 15 to the

date of payment.
The Decision followsi
(T.D.
)
TAX ON UNJUST ENRICHMENT (WINDFALL TAX)
TITLE III OF THE REVENUE ACT OF 1936

Extension of Time for Filing Returns
and Paying Tax
TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Washington, D,C,
TO COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE
AND OTHERS CONCERNED:.

The first paragraph of Treasury Decision 4689,. approved
August 26, 1936 (int. Rev*. Bull. XV-35, 14) is hereby amended to provide
as follows;

MPursuant to the provisions of section 53 and sec­
tion 503 of the Revenue Act of 1936, an extension of time
for such period as may be necessary, but not later than
December 15, 1936, is hereby granted for the filing of re­
turns and paying the tax under Title III of the Revenue Act
of 1936, for any taxable year ended on or before August 31,
1936.»
This Treasury Decision is issued under the authority prescribed by
sections 53, 62, and 503 of the Revenue Act of 1936.
GUY T. HELVERING
Approved:
HENRY MORGENTHAU, JR.
Secretary of the Treasury.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.■

IT: BE
WS

MB. SECRETARY:
The attached proposed Treasury Decision, submitted herewith Tor
your consideration with the re commendat ion that it he approved, has
been prepared for the purpose of amending the first paragraph of
Treasury Decision 4689, approved August 26, 1936,. (Xnt. Rev. Bull.
XY-35, 14), relating to the tax on unjust enrichment under Title III
of the Revenue Act of 1936, so as to grant an extension of time for
such period as may he necessary, hut not later than December 15, 1936,
to persons subject to the provisions of that title for the payment of
the tax for any taxable year ended on or before August 31, 1936, as
well as for
ng returns tinder that title for such taxable years*
Since as provided in article 35 of Regulations 95 prescribed
under Title III of the Revenue Act of 1936, an extension of time for
filing a return does not operate to extend the time for the payment
of the tax or any part thereof, unless so specified in the extension,
the time for paying the tax was not extended by Treasury Decision 4689.
Section 503(c) of the Act provides in effect that if an extension of
time is granted for the payment of the tax under Title III there shall
be collected, as a part of any amount with respect to which an exten­
sion is granted, interest thereon at the rate of 6 percent per annum
only from the expiration of six months aftsr the due date thereof to
the expiration of the period of the extension* 'The extension of time
provided by Treasury Decision 4689 was granted for the reason that the
return form to be filed under Title III has not been completed, and
for the further reason that there is such great detail and complexity
involved in computing the unjust enrichment tax. It was estimated
that the regulations and return forms will not be available to the pub­
lic in sufficient time for filing returns earlier than the period granted
by the extension* The same reasons exist for granting an extension of
time for the payment of the tax as exist for granting an extension of
time for the filing of the returns* It is not believed, therefore, that
the taxpayers should be required to pay 6 percent interest on the tax
which would otherwise be required if the extension for paying the tax
were not granted*

Commissioner*

BB/mlf

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
Press Service

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,

$r—

9/14/36

Secretary o f the Treasury Morgenthau announced la s t
evening th at the tenders for 150,000,000, or thereabouts, of
273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated September 16, 1936, and maturing
June 16, 1937, which were offered on September 11, were opened
at the Federal Reserve banks on September 14#
The to ta l amount applied for was 1104,697,000, o f
which |50,022,000 was accepted*

Except fo r one bid o f #50,000

the accepted bids ranged in price from 99*905, equivalent to
a rate o f about 0*125 percent per annum, to 99*881, equivalent
to a rate o f about 0*157 percent per annum, on a bank discount
b a s is .

Only part of the amount b id for at the la t t e r price

was accepted.

The average p rice of Treasury b i l l s to be

issued i s 99*889 and the average rate i s about 0*146 percent
per a m

m on a bank discount basis*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tnogflay, September 15. 1936.
9/14/36

Press Service
8—42

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening
that the tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury "bills,
dated September 16, 1936, and maturing June 16, 1937, which were offered
on September 11, were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on September 14«
The total amount applied for was $104,697,000, of which
$50,022,000 was accepted.

Except for one bid of $50,000, the accepted

bids ranged in price from 99*905, equivalent to a rate of about 0,125 percent
per annum, to 99*881, equivalent to a rate of about 0^157 percent per annum,
on a bank discount basis.
price was accepted*

Only part of the amount bid for at the latter

The average price.of Treasury bills to be issued is

99,889 and the average rate is about 0*146 percent per annum on a bank
discount basis.

TRZASOrar DSPABTkKBT
mahington

roa

Trass Sertica

BMEDIATB SSLIASS,

Tuesday. September 18. 1936
9/15/36

**

Sacrata17 of the Treasury Morganthau today announced the final «ibscriptiea
and allotment figuras with rsspaat to the currant offering of 8-3/4 partant Traasury
Bonds of 1956-59.
Subscriptions and allotunts «ara ditidad aaong tha «atarai federal Bcscm
districts and the Treasury «a follona i
federai assarts Total Cash
District
SubscriptIona
Rscaited

Boston
Haw York
Philadelphia

Clatolead
Hiohnond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Ionia
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San francisco
Treasury

# 496,377,180
496,37?,190
8,708,60S,800
8,708,803,800
308,586,380
308,884,380
868,343,080
160,703,980
160,703,990
188,898,300
487,873,880
487,378,880
140,798,800
140,788,800
63,016,800
96,683,180
86,488,880
868,889,700
268,285,700
8.308.880

Total Oaah
Subscriptions
Allotted

Total snhange
Subscriptions
Racaitad
(Allotted in full)

8 10,906,800
6 40,119,700
307,088,700
800,819,030
17.881.000
86,870,700
11,099,500
88,109,880
34,808,800
17,904,880
7,688,500
18,508,500
78,877,100
49,68^680 tsro
7,130,900
83,886,780
18.179.000
9,833,480
6,668,800
15,514,250
3,881,000
17,888,380
17,176,300
88,787,880
1811,860,805

Total
Subscription*
A llotted

f 81,086,800
807.601.750
46,691,700
39.208.750
58.406.750
89,988,000
188.887.750
30,387,650
81,418,480
88,177,050
80,809,350
39,938,150

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Tuesday, September 15, 1936.

Press Servico
No. 8-43

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau today announced the final subscription
and allotment figures with respect to the current offering of

2- 3/4

percent

Treasury Bonds of 1956-59.
Subscriptions and allotments were divided among the several Eederal Reserve
districts and ther Treasury as follows:

Federal Reserve
District

Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmaad
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Balias
San Francisco
Treasury
TOTAL

Total Cash
Subscriptions
Received

Total Cash
Subscriptions
Allotted

$

496,377,150 $ 40,119,700
2,703,503,200 200,519,050
302,554,350
26,870,700
265,343,050
28,109,250
160,703,950
17,904,250
122,892,300
18,502,500
427,875,850
49,650,650
140,758,800
23,226,750
63,016,800
9,233,450
94,683,150
15,514,250
86,422,550
17,258,350
262,285,700
22,757,850
3.305.850
298.500
$5,129,722,700 $469,965,250
ooOoo

Total Exchange
Subscriptions
Received
(Allotted in full)
$ 10,904,500
307,082,700
17,821*000
11.099.500
34.502.500
7,425,500
75,877,100
7,130,900
12,179,000
6,662,800
3,251,000
17,174,300
750,000
$511,860,800

Total
Subscriptions
Allotted

$ 51,024,200
507.601.750
44,691,700
39.208.750
52.406.750
25,928,000
125.527.750
30,357,650
21,412,450
22,177,050
20,509,350
39,932,150
1.048,500
$981,826,050

Draft 2

PRESS RELEASE

The Treasury Department announced today «tn connecLLuil wiun its
firptamb i l rilT fUn

i "t'1'f

f 1^ " U n i t e d

States Savings bonds

are to be offered for sale through two additional fiscal agencies —
Federal Savings and Loan Associations and Federal Credit Unions.

Any

of these organizations which duly qualifies and which has a membership

U ¿IM1k<rnU(<fr

3un,\f±t*f*

of 500 or more, will, receive applications and remittances for* and

* -H u

rtu ^

.

^

to

■

make delivery of ^ Dav»nsgAbonds^ swehvtransactions^.to be nandled only
in connection with purchases by

embers of the respective organizations.

?e ________
^ 9
organizations within this category, having
altogether there are

ffii

an aggregate membership of more than

■At

rrt t s a v i n g ?

bonds a^e sold only through Post Offices, Federal Reserve Banks, or by the
Treasurer of the United States, upon applications filed direct or through
the mail*
In exercising his statutory authority to jpequire these duties of the
T H | ~‘ fiscal agencies Mwedpwed, the Secretary of the Treasury is seekm.

i SB |

to carry out his program of widespread distribution of pavings Bonds, in
harmony with two of the basic purposes
and the Federal Credit Union Act.

jof

the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933

JSoth of these Acts speak not only of th

promotion of thrift, but also of/xhe establishment of a further market for
1 Stc

Q*
O

3thor

and Credit Uni oiis, by the very nature of t'

no oecause oi

The Secret?iry expresses his belief th

heS(3 statutory ]provisions, are in a unique

position to perfornySa real service in t
and. for their owsr members.

ard, both for the United States

PRESS RELEASE

The Treasury Department announced today that United States
Savings bonds are to be offered for sale through two additional
fiscal agencies —

Federal Savings and Loan Associations and

Federal Credit Unions.

Aiy of these organizations which duly

qualifies and which has a membership of 500 or more, will be
authorized to receive applications and remittances for Savings
Bonds and to make delivery of the bonds.

These transactions are

to be handled only in connection with purchases by members of the
respective organizations.
Altogether there are 292 organizations within this category,
having an aggregate membership of more than 500,000.

Heretofore,

Savings Bonds have been sold only through Post Offices, Federal
Reserve Banks, or by the Treasurer of the United States, upon appli­
cation filed direct or through the mail.
Authority to designate Federal Savings and Loan Associations
and Federal Credit Unions as fiscal agents of the Government was
conferred bn the Secretary of the Treasury by the Home Owners Loan
Act

and the Federal Credit Union Act.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Thursday« September 17« 1956.
9/16/56.

Press Service
No, 8-44

The Treasury Department announced today that United States Savings
Bonds are to "be offered for sale through two additional fiscal agencies —
j

Federal Savings and Loan Associations and Federal Credit Unions#

Any of

these organizations which duly qualifies and which has a membership of 500
or more, will be authorized to receive applications and remittances for
Savings Bonds and to make delivery of the bonds.

These transactions are

to be handled only in connection with purchases by members of the respective
organizations.
Altogether there are 292 organizations within this category, having
an aggregate membership of more than 500,000,

Heretofore, Savings Bonds

have been sold only through Post Offices, Federal Reserve Banks, or by the
Treasurer of the United States, upon application filed direct or through
the mail.
Authority to designate Federal Savings and Loan Associations and Federal
Credit Unions as fiscal agents of the Government was conferred on the
Secretary of the Treasury by the Home Owners Loan Act and the Federal Credit
Union Act,
ooOoo

lì'

.

S'- / r

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to September
5, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the totals
allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

September 16, 1936*

TO MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department )
FROM MR. JREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade
Agreement, during the period from January 1 to Septenber 5, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

-4

6/ S

Customs District

T a m IMPORTS
Per Cent of $uota
FBOM

(a)

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

:
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

144,411
92.7$

4,103
20.5$

27,418
3,562
21,853
231
71
562
6,829
39,361
906
1,328
3,133
22
529
290
17,960

1
11
832
38
31
384
2,270
536

124,055

4,103

7,517
7,080
5,702
57

•
•
-

20,356

-

OMAHA

Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine 5c N. H*
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
PR CM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

(a)

: Cattle
: Under 175
: Pounds
: (Head)

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.

/

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, September 16, 1936,

Press Service
No. 8-45

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January

1

to September 5, 1936, and the percentage that such

imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs District

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Sun er ior
Maine & N.H
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
Hew York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St, Lawrence
.Vermont
Washington

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
'¿Head)

(a)

144,411
-9S.7#

27,418
3,562
21,853
231
71
562
-- - - «
6,829
39,361
906
1,328
3,133

22
. ___

529
290
17.960
124,055

......

Tm™, T°tal from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

(a)

7,517
7,080
5,702
57
20,356

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.
ooOoo

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
or more
(Head)
4,103
___________ 20.54

1
•» M M

11
•M — —
832
» ~ «
38
_
31
«*.. ^
»
384
2,270
536
4,103
, , 1M

_

no*

)(

— — _
M ^ M

add malaria x x x and approvala

«

by the W,P.A«, and the Public Health Service©
Drainage for elimination of malaria transmitting mosquitoes-Dro Parran
pointed out, is a highly specialized drainage problem© Such drainage works"** are not
;
extensive or genagnlly an Twwgn as agricultural drainage systems
or flood control
rch< are designed to dissipate ^completely^ r e s i dual waters p n six or
works^fchey

seven

days©
As the aquatic stages in mosquito development under favorable conditions
require

from eight to ten days ^ the removal of the se

the

""prevents ■'11

metamorphosis of the eggs of

sKor

The malaria transmitting mosquito of the United States,Dr©Parran observed,
requires clean quiescent waters such as lakes and ponds which contain "floatage” or
small drift

for

protection

of the larva© and pupae from natural enemies and

which serves as an important source of food supply. Such waters may also be found I
in swampy areas from which timber has been removed and into which sufficient
sunlight is allowed to enter©
Because these technical features had to be considered before a successful
program could be undertaken, Dr .Parran said, the Public Health Service placed trains! I
supervisors at the disposal of state health departments not equipped with such
personnel, and augmented the trained personnel in those states in which large
amounts of work were contemplated.

federal
Malaria control work has been advanced by a 40 year average through/draina
projects « supervised by the United States Public Health Service, LLr"H U If"—
r
^"ftT^HinitTnrTh Surgeon General Thomas Parran
tod a y x ^ l .
ilifiiwaia^.1 rmpnarts
|

in

Vw

T~)ii11t~j ii_ ~l lii^jtlirnr years^hese projects have been operated bybfche P.Yf.A., thj
P.W.A., and the E.R.A., , Dr* Parran estimates that 22,000 miles of ditches have
malaria transmitting mosquito^-g^,
been constructed , eliMmtThg^'S40i:000.abres"o^fbreedlhg areasjfand affording prote)
from malaria to approximately 14,000,000

persons in

states*

Malaria control drainage projects under supervision of the Public Health
n/
/
iV//
' /
to Virginia,North and South Carolina,Georgia]
^
y
s/
v
V
I
/
V
Florida, Alabama,Missis sippi, Arkansas ,Tennes see, Kentucky, Illinois ,Mis s ouri,Texas,

isjps-M#
Service,
been confined £

J.

w r ib iy

' »—

J

Oklahoma and Louisiana,

^

y

W.3

nn 1 if »«*»*■■ and along the Rio Grande Valley "inHetT]

Numerous useful land drainage and pest mosquito control projects have been|
conducted by local and state agencies in states not in the malaria belt,Dr*Parran
or technically supervised
pointed out, but projects of this kind have not been 1»'approved,/as malaria control
drainage projects by the Public Health Service^ Notable among these projects for ot|
purposes have been flood control and pest mosquito control projects in the New
England states sponsored by local agencies and operated by the state and local

W.PI

organizations*
Before a malaria control drainage project is presented to the Public ^ealtj
proposal
Service for final approval, Dr «Parran explained, the gg^gztoonxxk originates^ in
A u
i
the state!, selected and sponsored by t he state health department concerned* Often|
a local community requests a project and its state health department takes the
application for review* Before project^ ...... ....... ..... m l miP the State health
departments survey^its health and ijBCJi technical aspects* The necessary data are
collected and compiled ,and a project is prepared* The state W.P.A*, administrator
A
must approve the project with special reference to labor,materials, and other
¿»AA
operative features* The grfoject.is then forwarded to Yfashington, for review and ap]

-3-

administrator approves the project, with special reference to
labor, materials, and other operative features.

The project is

then forwarded to Washington for WPA and Public Health Service
review and approval*
The Public Health Service approves and extends technical
supervision only to worthy malaria control projects which have been
investigated and sponsored by the health department of the State
in which the proposed project is located*

Numerous useful land drainage

and pest mosquito control projects have been conducted by local and
State agencies in States not in the malaria belt, but projects of this
kind have not been approved as malaria control drainage projects or
technically supervised by the Public Health Service* Notable among
these projects for other purposes have been flood control and pest
mosquito control projects in the New England states sponsored by
local agencies and operated by the State and local WPA organizations*
The accomplishments of the emergency relief malaria control
drainage projects are impressive* During the three years which
they have been operating it is estimated that 22,000 miles of ditches
have been constructed, resulting in eliminating about 340,000 acres
of anopheline breeding areas and affording protection from malaria
to approximately 14,000,000 persons*

The State health officers in

the malarious states estimate that these projects have advanced ma­
laria control work in their states from 20 to 80 years, with an over­
all average of 40 years* The prevention of many cases and deaths
from malaria with attendant elimination of expense for medical care
and loss of income from the debilitating disease malaria not only

add malaria x x x

W.P.A**

and the Public Health Service«
Drainage for elimination of malaria transmitting mosquitoes,Dr.Parran
pointed out, is a highly specialized drainage problem« Such drainage works^are not
lojjwgo as agricultural drainage systems or flood control

extensive

works« They are designed to dissipate residual waters completely in six or seven
days« As the aquatic stages in mosqdito

development under favorable conditions

require from eight to ten days the removal of these waters within a shorter period
prevents the metamorphosis of the eggs«
The malaria transmitting mosquito of the United States:,Dr«Parran observedj
requires clean quiescent waters such
or smally±

as lakes and ponds which contain ’’floatage"

drift for protection of the larvae and pupae from natural enemies and

which serves as an important source of food supply« Such waters may also be found
in swampy areas from which timber has been removed and into which sufficient
sunlight is allowed to enter«
Because these technical features had to be considered before a successful
program could be undertaken,Dr «Parran said* the Public Health Service placed
trained supervisors at the disposal of state health departments not equipped with
such personnel* and augmented the trained personnel in those states: in which large
amounts of work were contemplated«
-o«

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
ipdajL^H&eptember 20« 1956»

\j-J-JL {K/Q*AAS\~*A

■

n

1/j Q d M ^ W k

'

" V w iff «

V
Malaria control work has been advanced by a 40 year average through feder

drainage projeots supervised by the United States Public Health Service* Surgeon

j

General Thomas Parran said today*
In the past three years during which these projects have been operated by
the C*W.A**the P*W.A., and the E*R.A*, Dr*Parran estimates that 22*000 miles of
ditches have been constructed»eliminating 340*000 acres of breeding areas used by
malaria transmitting mosquitoes and affording protection from malaria to

!k stateso

approximately 14,000*000 persons in ^

Malaria control drainage projects under supervision of the Public Health
Service have been confined to Virginia*North and South Carolina*Georgia,Florida*
Alabama,Mis sissippi*Arkansas,Tennessee* Kentucky, II lino is,Mis souri, Texas, Oklahoma,
Louisiana and a section of New Mexico along the Rio Grande Valley*
L
Numerous useful land drainage and pest mosquito control projects have bep
conducted by local and state agencies in states not in the malaria belt,Dr#Parran|
proposed,
pointed out* but projects of this kind have not been/approved or technically
supervised as malaria control drainage projects by the Public Health Service*
_
J
Notable among these project's for other purposes have been flood control!
and pest mosquito control projects in t he New England states sponsored by local I
agencies and operated by the state and local W.P.A., organizations*
Before a malaria control drainage project is presented to the Public
Health Service for final approval,Dr*Parran explained,the proposals originates in
the state being selected and sponsored by the state health department concerned*
/
Often a local

community requests a project and its state health department takes

the application for review* Before a project is applied for the State Health depaij
surveys its health and technical aspects* The necessary data are collected and cop
and a project application is prepared# The state W.P.A*,administrator must approve
the project with special reference to labor*materials*and other operative features!
The application then is forwarded to Yfashington*for review and approval by the T
m-o-r-e

Removal Notice
The item identified below has been removed in accordance with FRASER's policy on handling
sensitive information in digitization projects due to copyright protections.

Citation Information
Document Type: Newspaper Article

Number of Pages Removed: 2

Author(s):
Title:

"A Question of Fact"

Date:
Journal:

Volume:
Page(s):
URL:

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org

treasury department

WASHINGTON
Press Service
for r e l e a s e , m o r n i n g n e w s p a p e r s

Sunday. September 30. 1936.— .—

H o . 8-46

9/16/36
Malaria control work has been advanced by a 40 year a v e r s e through
• ,t* supervised hy the United States Public Health Service,
federal drainage projects supervisee. y
surgeon General Thomas Parran said today.
In the past three years during which these projects have been op3 ,£
c » A
the P. W. A., and the E, E. A., Dr. Parran estimates
erated by the C. w. a , , to*, jt.
that 22,000 miles of ditches have been constructed eliminating 340,000 acres
breeding areas used by malaria transmitting mos.uitoes and affordrng
.protection from malaria to approximately 14,000,000 persons in 16 states.
M a l i i a control drainage projects under supervision of the Public
r.. a 4.«
Health Service have been confine

t

t

N orth and South Car0-^n a »

a

’

.
Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Illino'
Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississipp ,
a
n„f4nn nf New Mexico along the Rio
Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and a
Grande Val1 © y •
Numerous useful land drainage and pest mosquito control projec s
•
nn o+ntps not in the malaria
have been conducted by local and state agencies
• +
this kind have not been proposed,
belt, Dr- Parran pointed out, but projec

a
moinria control drainage projects by
approved or technically supervised as malaria
the Public Health Service.
Notable among these projects for other purposes have been
trol and pest mosquito control projects in the He. England states
local agencies end operate. *

the . * . *

^

'• »> *'

-

2

-

Before a malaria control drainage project is presented to the Public
Health Service for final approval, Dr . Parran explained*, the proposal originates
in the state being selected and sponsored by the state health department con­
cerned.

Often a local community requests a project and its state health de­

partment takes the application for review.

Before a project is applied for the

State Health department surveys its health and technical aspects.

The necessary

data are collected and compiled, and a project application is prepared.

The

state W. P. A., administrator must approve the project with special reference
to labor, materials, and other operative features.

The application then is

forwarded to Washington, for review and approval by the W. P. A., and the
Public Health Service.
Drainage for elimination of malaria transmitting mosquitoes, Dr.
Parran pointed out, is a highly specialized drainage problem.

Such drainage

works generally are not as extensive as agricultural drainage systems or
flood control works.
in six or seven days.

They are designed to dissipate residual waters completely
As the aquatic stages in mosquito development under

favorable conditions require from eight to ten days the removal of these
waters within a shorter period prevents the metamorphosis of the eggs.
The malaria transmitting mosquito of the United States, Dr. Parran
observed, requires clean quiescent waters such as lakes and ponds which con­
tain "floatage” or small drift for protection of the larvae and pupae from
natural enemies and which serves as an important source of food supply.

Such

waters may also be found in swampy areas from which timber has been removed
and into which sufficient sunlight is allowed to enter.
Because these technical features had to be considered before a suc­
cessful program could be undertaken, Dp. Parran said, the Public Health Service
placed trained supervisors at the disposal of state health departments not
equipped with such personnel, and augmented the trained personnel in those
states in which large amounts of work were contemplated.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

■mm

Washington
Press Service
No.-Mr

OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,

oàn&ückiyi J u ly frül’rt'froo»

.

/

8-fi
Net market purchases of Government securities for Treasury investment
CUm
accounts for the ca].endar month of Jksiot 1936, amounted to flOOptOD^i^Q,
Acttwg Secretary
’"T’
vvtrt-

announced today.
■{ w w < i

00O 00

•$>

ip cj\\iso

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday. September 17. 1936.

Press Service
No. 8— 47

Net market purchases of Government securities for Treasury
investment accounts for the calendar month of August, 1936, amounted to
$3,794,850, Secretary Morgenthau announced today.

0O 0-

4 -

constitutes 27.4 per cent of the total as compared with 45.2 per cent,
inclusive of Liberty bonds and 6.5 per cent exclusive of the Liberty
bonds, on June 30, 1933.

Since 1932 the largest increase, both absolute

and pe rcentage, has taken place in obligations maturing in between one
and five years, a classification which now includes nearly one-third of the
interest-bearing public debt, excluding such special obligations as Postal
Savings, United States Savings and Adjusted Service bonds and special
issues to governmental agenoies and trust funds.

This fact is regarded

as of considerable significance since, if conditions remain substantially
as favorable as they are now, it will be possible to refund this large
fraction

of the public

debt on far better terms than were

a year ago.
P

ul

C&

.
/

_ uft— r.

6^-

I.

possibl^/

- 3 -

investors, would have tended to abs orb savings that might otherwise be
made available for industry.

These considerations in favor of a large

use of short-term securities appea: to have been justified*

Between

June 30, 1933, and December 31, 191 4, member bank holdings of Government
securities increased by a little m< re than #3 billions, and their total
IP
flmuiaiafr• deposits by about
billions*
Narrower financial considerations also dictated a large reliance
upon short-term issues during the calj^tidar years 1933 and 1934#

Interest

rates, though declining, were mainlined at relatively high levels during
1933 and the early months of IJSfM bdcauso of a variety of uncertainties
arising mainly out of f o re^n devel< pments, uncertainties that made for
erratic movements*

In September 19i 3, for example, the average yield on

all long-term U. S. ^easury bonds ia.s 3*20 per cent; by December it had
moved up to 3*53 p^r cent; by May 2(93^, it had fallen to 3*01 per cent,
only to rise ag^dn to 3*20 per cent ih September 1934*

Further, the large-

f
dcale financing of the recovery and relief program had to be undertaken
concurrently with the enomous volume of Liberty bond refunding, refunding
that was highly desirable, nevertheless, because of the high coupon rates
or tax ^xemption privileges of the ¿Lberty bond issues*

With fundamental

factor^ giving promise of a substantial decline in interest rates, it was
considered wise policy, therefore, tl resort very substantially to shortter^

on*

/

Between June 30, 1933, and the present date, the percentage of the
debt maturing in less than one year has been reduced from 15*6 to 11*6
and the percentage maturing in fifteen years or more has been increased from
18*5 to 27*9*

The medium term debt maturing in five to fifteen years nctf

—

2

—

compensate for the lapse of time*
At the close of the calendar year 1951 the average length of final
maturity of the interest-bearing public debt, excluding Consols and
O.CC.J SyK stsc-ic-f

A*

vZ-A-o\A f~

t

Postal Savings bonds, was ten years and ten months*

During the next tvro

A

and one quarter calendar years the average length of final maturity fell
almost steadily, reaching a low of seven years and four months at the end
of March, 1934*

At this date the average maturity was only five years

and seven months, if the actual call dates of the Liberty and Panama Canal
bonds be regarded as their maturity dates*

Between September 1931 and

June, 1933, Federal financing was confined exclusively to notes, bills,
and certificates*

Thiraap the culuMCfySgr^lOBly ^he average length to

final maturity of the public debt was increased only slightly, to seven

^

years and s even months

^

J J

^ V,

A number of important factors lictated a continuing large use of
short-term rather than long-term secu rities for the Federal financing
of the calendar years 1933 and 1934*
one of these*

Monetary o ohsi de rations constituted

It was thought highly desirable to increase the aggregate

volume of bank deposits in ordexvro c mpensate for the drastic deflation
in such deposits that had^Wsulted fr on the enormous reduction of bank
loans*

(Between the ß

of PQ29 and

deposits had declined by more tl

he end of 1932, total member bank

$9 billions*)

Bank purchases of Govern-

ment securities had the effeot of dir *ctly increasing the total volume of
/
\
bank deposits; and short-term obligal ionaswere greatly preferred by banking
institutions to longer-term securities*

Longer-term bonds with high

coupon rates, moreover, by appealing to institutional and individual

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington

Press Service
No. 8-

As a result of the substitution of bonds for notes in recent
Treasury financing, the .long-term obligations of the United States now»
A
(m G a jL^ T
t—
&£u *44a »4 Brk M
-constitute 55*3 per cent of the entire public debt,(Secretary Horgentnau
announced today.

A

A

On June 30, 1935, the proportion of long-term securities,

that is bonds with a maturity upwards of five years, was 48*6 per cent

and

on June 30, 1934 it was 44.7 per cent*
There has been at the same time a substantial increase in the average
length of maturity of the interest bearing public debt.

The August 31,

1936, average, adjusted to give effect to the September 15th financing,
is nine years and eight months as compared with seven years and seven months
at tfao end-ef-~1934»

This increase in average maturity has been accompanied

by a pronounced reduction in the interest rates paid by the Treasury.

The

average yield on long-term Treasury bonds was 3.66 per cent in 1932j 3.31
per cent in 1933 and 3.10 per cent in 1934*

In 1935 and 1936 no Treasury

bonds were offered to yield more than 2.875 per cent -to tho e arl ie-st^trKll
¿ata ; slightly more than five billions of Treasury bonds were is sued cariying a coupon rate of only 2*75 per cent; #2,611 millions carried a coupon
rate of 2.875 per cent and #211 millions of three per cent bonds of a
previous issue were sold at auction to yield an average of about 2*64 per eeu
The Secretary called attention to the fact that the extension of
maturities involves the factor of a race against time since the natality
of an unchanged debt becomes one year shorter each year.

Tbs increase that

lias been accomplished is a net increase in addition to that needed to

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Sundayt September 2Q f.1,936,
9/17/36.

Press Service
No. 8-48

As a result of the substitution of bonds for notes in recent Treasury
financing, the proportion of long-term obligations of the United States was
further increased to 515,3 per cent of the entire interest-bearing public debt,
exclusive of Postal Savings, U, S. Savings, and Adjusted Service Bonds, and of
special issues to governmental agencies and trust funds, Secretary Morgenthau
announced today.

On June 30, 1935, the proportion of long-term securities,

that is bonds with a maturity upwards of five years, was 48.6 per cent and
^n June 30, 1934, it was 44.7 per eent.
There has been at the same time a substantial increase in the average
length of maturity of the interest-bearing public debt.

The August 31, 1936,

average, adjusted to give effect to the September 15th financing, is nine
years and eight months as compared with seven years and seven months on
December 31, 1934.

This increase in average maturity has been accompanied

by a pronounced reduction in the interest rates paid by the Treasury.
average yield on long-term Treasury bonds was 3.66 per cent in 1932;
per cent in 1933 and 3.10 per cent in 1934.

The
3.31

In 1935 and 1936 no Treasury

bonds were offered to yield more than 2.875 per cent;

slightly more than

five billions of Treasury bonds were issued carrying a coupon rate of only
2,75 per cent;

$211

$2,611 millions carried a coupon rate of 2.875 per cent and

millions of three per cent bonds of a previous issue were sold at

auction to yield an average of about 2.64 per cent.

-

2

-

The Secretary called attention to the fact that the extension of ma­
turities involves the factor of a race against time since the maturity of an
unchanged debt becomes one year shorter each year.

The increase that has

been accomplished is a net increase in addition to that needed to compensate
for the lapse of time.
At the close of the calendar yea** 1931 the average length of final
maturity of the interest-bearing public debt, excluding Consols and Postal
Savings bonds, and special issues to Government Trust Funds, was ten years
and ten months.

During the next two and one-quarter calendar years the

average length of final maturity fell almost steadily, reaching a low of
seven years and four months at the end of March, 1934,

At this date the

average maturity was only five years and seven months, if the actual call
dates of the Liberty and Panama Canal bonds be regarded as their maturity
dates.

Between September, 1931, and June, 1933, Federal financing was con­

fined exclusively to notes, bills, and certificates.

The average length to

final maturity of thé public debt was increased only slightly, to seven years
and seven months by the end of the calendar year 1934,
Between June 30, 1933, and the present date, the percentage of the
debt maturing in less than one year has been reduced from 15,6 to 11,6 and
the percentage maturing in fifteen years or more has been increased from
18,5 to 27,9,

The medium term debt maturing in five to fifteen years now

constitutes 2?,4 per cent of the total as compared with 45,2 per cent, in­
clusive of Liberty bonds and 6,5 per cent exclusive of the Liberty bonds,
on June 30, 1933,

Since 1932 the largest increase, both absolute and

3

-

percentage, has taken place in obligations maturing in between one and five,
years, a classification which now includes nearly one-third of the interestbearing public debt, excluding such special obligations as Postal Savings,
United States Savings and Adjusted Service bonds and special issues to govern­
mental agencies and trust funds.

This fact is regarded as of considerable

significance since, if conditions remain substantially as favorable as they
are now, it will be possible to refund this large fraction of the public debt
on far better terms than were possible even a year ago.
The attached graph shows the composition of the interest-bearing
public debt in percentages from 1930 to the present date.

— oOo—

treasury deparboht

Washington
Press Service
9/21/36
Secretary o f the Treasury Morgenthau announced l a s t evening
that the tenders for 150,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day
Treasury b i l l s , dated September 23, 1936, and maturing June 23,
1937, which were offered on September 18, were opened at the
Federal Reserve banks on September 21«
The to ta l amount applied for was $132,397,000, o f which
150,022,000 was accepted*

The accepted bids ranged in price

from 99*910, equivalent to a rate o f about 0*119 percent per
annum, to 99*877, equivalent to a rate of about 0*162 percent
per annum, on a bank discount b a sis.

Only part o f the amount

bid fo r a t the l a t t e r price was accepted*

The average price

o f Treasury b i l l s to be issued is 99.881 and the average rate
i s about 0*156 percent per annum on a bask discount basis*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

OK RELEASE, MORNING- NEWSPAPERS,
esday. September 22. 1936.
-21-36

Press Service
No# g_49

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the tenders
»

[or $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury hills, dated September 23, 1936
^nd maturing June 23, 1937, which were offered on September 18, were opened at the
federal Reserve banks on September 21.
The total amount applied for was $132,397,000, of which $50,022,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged -In price from 99.910, equivalent to a rate of

ibout 0.119 percent per annum, to 99.877, equivalent to a rate of about 0.162 perjent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
•atter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for at the

The average price of Treasury bills to be issued is

r*^81 and the average rate is about 0.156 percent per annum on a bank discount
iasis.
ooOoo

Sta

September 22, 1936

TO MR. FtJSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)

FROM MR* FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quote pro—
visions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period from
January 1 to September 12, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

JM

4

Customs District

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head!

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

Dairy Covs
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

(a)

144,976
93,1#

4,243
21*«

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth and Superior
Maine and N* H*
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St* Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

27,492
3,562
21,853
231
71
562
~
6,891
39,488
906
1,328
3,133

1

11

839
«*
38
•
4»

549
290
18,210

33
•
•
«
391
2,317
613

Total from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
11 Paso
San Antonio
San Diego

124,588

4,243

Total from Mexico

20,588

(a)
(

22

7,522
7,080
5,729
57

ae

m
ae
ae
epe

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled*
-of-Customs)

K

'

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions
of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
September 12, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear
to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR IMMEDIATE REIEASE,
Tuesday, September 22, 1936*

Press Service
No, 8-50

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade
Agreement, for the period January 1 to September 12, 1936, and the percentage
that such imports beai to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as
follows:

Customs District

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
_____ (Read)_____

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

(a)

144,976
93,1$

PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N.H,
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia,
St, Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,522
7,080
5,729
57
20,388

(a)

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
or More
(Head)
4,243
2 1 .2$

1

27,492
3,562
21,853
231
71
562

~

_

11
— «

839

— — ~

'*¿4'.' m*é —•

22

*f*’V*&**

549
290
18,210
124,588

391
2,317
613
4,243

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled.
ooOoo

38

6,891
39,488
906
1,328
3,133

~
_

~
„

_

33

—,
_

_

-

- -

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
memorandum

for

the p r e s s

September 21, 1936

RECEIPTS OP SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended September 18, 1936:
Philadelphia................ .
San Francisco ....................... . .
Denver ................................,
Total for weekended September 18, 1936...
Total receipts through September 18, 1936

339,989.13 fine ounces
705,566.55
«
»
______ 8.441.97
" 11
1,053,997.65
,f
"
101,813,663.57
”
”

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended September 18, 1936:
Philadelphia ............................ ........
446.95 fine ounces
New York ........ ............ ....................
179.85
M
,r
San Francisco.....................................
Denver ....... ................................ .
New Orleans ......................................
Seattle ..........................................
626.80 fine ounces
Total for week ended September 18, 1936...........
tl
t!
Total receipts through September 18, 1936......... . 112,975,165.35
RECEIPTS OF GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:.
.
New
Week ended September 18, 1936:
Imports
Secondary______ Domestic
$ 93,110.29 $--------Philadelphia................. $ 8 , 7 0 6 . 3 9
New York ........
27,773,100.00 134,500.00
302,800.00
San Francisco..... ................
540,498.30
20,549.001,968,358,10
Denver ..................
49,879.28
17,846.69
783,604.12
New Orleans .......
282.79
31,286.73
113.47
Seattle ............. .............. ...............
7,065.62
674.355.15
Total for week ended September 18,...$28,372,466.76 $304,358.33 $3,729,230.84

R e l e a s e for M o r n i n g N e w s p a p e r s
S e p t . 23, 1 9 3 6
9-22-36

Commissioner

A

-^O

G u y T. H e l v e r i n g o f the
income tax
B u r e a u of I n t e r n a l R e v e n u e a n n o u n c e d c o l l e c t i o n s of $ 2 8 3 , 6 0 7
1936,
A
f o r the p e r i o d S e p t . 1-21, . i n c l u s i v e .
Th4h

£

c0-1-1w t T D i r d q u a r f f e r T f ^ n

1.1 rufiatt

period

of a y e a r ago,

1Q35,

income

tax

Sept.

collections
By

were

1-20,

In the

inclusive,

585

comparable
±k®

$226,352,401.47.

collection

districts

the

collections

for the

F o rm

6919-A

TREASURY DEPARTM ENT
I nternal R even u e B u reau
A c c o u n t a n d C o l l e c t io n s U n it

Comparative Statement of Income Taxes Collected September 1 - 2 0 . inclusive. 1955.
and September 1-21. inclusive. 1956.

Revised June 1934

(Based on Telegraphic Reports from Collectors)

D IST R IC T S

Deposited
Deposited
Sept. 1-20,1935 Sept. 1-21,1936

Est.Dndeposited Est.Dhdeposited
Sept. 1-30,1935 Sept. 1-21.1936

Total
1935
Ì

A labam a,

575,901.07

Arizona,

125,130.05
258,888.55

Arkansas,
1st California,

Clear

207,560.09

334,992.42

Clear

125,130.05
258,888.55

334,992.42

7,690,194.07

Clear

7,690,194.07

1,801,588.86

Clear

Clear

1,467,045.44

1,801,588.86

4,860,237.90

6,291,813.75

Clear

Clear

4,860,237.90

Delaware,

6,291,813.75

5,307,297.23

6,236,770.30

Clear

Clear

5,307,297.23

Florida,

6,236,770.30

1,444,815.15

2,704,414.04

Clear

Clear

1,444,815.15

Georgia,

2,704,414.04

1,463,150.08

1,528,569.93
1,556,278.53s1

Clear

Clear
Clear

1,463,150.08

1,528,569.93
1,556,278.53*

252,525.86

Clear

20,636,273.62

Clear
Clear

Clear

130,986.07
16,575,684.97

20,636,273.62

6,993,669.34

854,563.32
130,986.07
16,575,684.97 I

Clear

854,563.32

252,525.86

8th Illinois,

1,092,715.36

1,585,584.04

Clear

Clear

1,092,715.36

Indiana,

1,585,584.04

3,308,729.36

4,244,855.92

Clear

3,302,729.36

4,244,855.92

Iowa,

1,020,732.34

1,533,278.28

Clear
Clear

Clear

1,020,732.34

Kansas,

1,533,278.28

891,698.60

Clear

756,264.50
1,604,605.83

891,698.60

2,273,077.88

Clear
Clear

Clear

Kentucky,

756,264.50
1,604,605.83

Louisiana,

2,273,077.88

1,219,233.13

1,366,979.02

Clear

Clear

1,219,233.13

1,366,979.02

669,179.64

733,526.50

Clear

Clear

669,179.64

733,526.50

5,762,965.31

Clear

Clear

4,986,143.77

5,762,965.31

9,233,478.65

12,398,103.22

Clear

Clear

9,233,478.65

12,398,103.22

11,370,482.40

Clear
Clear

Clear
Clear

11,370,482.40

2,500,083.00

18,251,312.35
3,138,243.00

2,500,083.00

18,251,312.35
3,138,843.00

Mississippi,,

157,508.59

254,961.80

Clear

Clear

157,508.59

254,961.80

1st Missouri,

4,384,907.58

4,213,786.51

Clear

Clear

4,384,907.58

4,213,786.51

6thJ^dissouri,

1,685,777.11

1,883,158.10

Clear

Clear

1,685,777.11

1,883,158.10

301,749.31

Clear

Clear

756,182.39

Clear

Clear

241,413.41
793,588.78

301,749.31

Nebraska,

241,413.41
793,588.78

Nevada,

286,596.35

Clear

3 1 9 .S Ô S .3 3

496,866.75

Clear.
Clear

226,596.35

New Hampshire,

319,368.33
511,827.48

496,866.75

511,827.48
1,516,473.31
11,021,381.25

Minnesota,

lontana,

1st New Jersey,

VS^UOfl

5th New Jersey,

TU W S

New Mexico,

TU# 1

1st New York,
2d New York,
3d New York,

4,986,143.77 ,

1,516,473.31

Clear

756,182.39

1,438,226.74
9,713,433.64

Clear
Clear

Clear

11,021,381.25

Clear

1,438,226.74
9,713,433.64

94,008.77

124,414,86

Clear

Clear

94,008.77

124,414.86

4,073,245.00
33,610,649.82

4,516,487.00

Clear
Clear

Clear
Clear

4,073,245.00

4,516,487.00

33,610,649.82

42,887,286.19

Clear

28,105,125.40

Clear

22,795,092.05
3,431,997.70

42,887,286.19
28,105,125.40

14th*New York,

22,795,092.05
3,431,997.70

4,658,243.97

Clear
Clear

21st New York,

1,227,565.20

1,037,573.63

Clear

Clear

1,227,565.20

1,037,573.63

28th New York,

4,096,894.37 ;

Clear

3,542,115.95

Clear

Clear
Clear

4,096,894.37

North Carolina,

4,874,001.15
3,436,577.34

3,542,115.95

4,874,001.15
3,436,577.34

71,579.84

90,324.76

Clear

Clear

71,579.84

90,324.76

Clear
Clear

Clear

3,999,797.03
1,377,989.40

4,411,444.67

North Dakota,
1st Ohio,

reipnj

10th Ohio,

3,999,797.03
1,377,989.40

CI

Uth Ohio,

911,620.07

oqspi

18th*Ohio,

5,624,189.60

creasH

Oklahoma,

2,064,766.69
540,179.65

^ST

[S M O Ö f)

207,560.09

1,467,045.44

Michigan,

CI

609,167.34

Clear
Clear

8,626,390.63

Maryland, including
Dist. of Columbia,
Massachusetts,

^ 8

575,901,07

6,277,218.80

Maine,

121101

Clear

6,993,669.34

1st Illinois,

!usirB2

Clear

Clear

Idaho,

>14u© 2

609,167.34

Clear

H a w a ii,

Giiiupt
isino'i

*

8,626,390.63

Connecticut,

•S TŒ

y

6,277,218.80

Colorado,

TSSIpî
Quuiyi
?iqoipî
ressuyi

T" ' -- 1

Clear

6th California,

'H v$s
'H
!H *U|
rpBAGJtf
-ujqQij

Total
1936

Oregon,

j t j o iæ

4,411,444.67 ,
2,167,597.60
1,012,374.47

4,658,243.97

Clear

Clear
Clear

Clear

Clear

5,624,189.60

Clear

689,513.98

Clear
Clear

Clear

2,064,766.69
540,179.65

11,187,592.77

12,875,562.68

Clear

Clear

11,187,592.77

689,513.98
12,875,562.68

7,854,558.82
2,626,813.19

911,620.07

2,167,597.60
1,012,374.47
7,854,558.82
2,626,813*19

3M»t «Ç

1st Pennsylvania,

3 9 U IIO Q

12th Pennsylvania,

1,110,101.05

1,208,855.60

Clear

Clear

1,110,101.05

1,208,855.60

23d P ennsylvania,

7,080,911.86
1,599,565.15
448,385.10

8,892,823.95

Clear

7,080,911.86

8,892,823.95

1,960,329.69
417,356.84

Clear
Clear
Clear

Clear
Clear

1,599,565.15
448,385.10

1,960,329.69
417,356.84

88,334.56

117,893.67

Clear

Clear

88,334.56

117,893.67

1,602,742.10
2,300,255.60

1,865,170.54
3,567,938.85

Clear

Clear
Clear

1,602,742.10
2,300,255.60

1,865,170.54
3,567,938.85

2,499,813.73
252,475.87

3,089,969.60

Clear
Clear

Clear

3,089,969.60

Clear

2,499,813.73
252,475.87
176,935.55

290,476.40
2,982,299.99

2J O p O Q

*0

TO

2Q

I s !

îire^'V
i o z i

jY

irequiY

Rhode Island,
South Carolina,
South Dakota,
Tennessee,
1st Texas,
Texas,
Utah,

345,765.40

Clear

345,765.40

Vermont,

176,935.55

Virginia,

2,484,069.34

290,476.40
2,982,299.99

Clear
Clear

Clear
Clear

2,484,069.34

Washington, in c lu d in g
Alaska,
West V irginia,

1,172,332.35

1,558,882.67

Clear

Clear

1,172,332.35

1,176,954.95

1,447,350.35

Clear

Clear

1,176,954.95

1,558,882.67
1,447,350.35

Wisconsin,

2,367,567.93

2,876,218.08

Clear

Clear

2,367,567.93

2,876,218.08

174,117.52

183,302.34

Clear

Clear

174,117.52

183,302.34

Clear

Clear

Wyoming,

Rhili
Jppine Islands,

saupajli
EH 1101

Total,

326,552,401.47

283,607,585.72

^Hawaii, Report of 9/16/36 used.

226,352.401.47 j285,607,585.72

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Wednesday. September 23« 1936,
9-22-36

Press’Service
No. 8-51

Commissioner Guy T. H elvering of the Bureau of Internal Revenue announced
income tax collections of $283,607,585.72 for the. period September 1-21, 1936,
inclusive.

In the comparable period of a year ago, September 1^20, 1935, inclu­

sive, income tax collections were $226,352,401.47.
By collection districts the collections for the two periods as shown by
telegraphic reports from collectors, were as follows;
Districts
Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
1 st California
6th California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawai i
Idaho
1st Illinois
8th Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland, including
Dist. ef Columbia
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
1st Missouri
6th Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
1st New Jersey
5th New Jersey

Deposited
Sent. 1-20.1935
$
575,901.07
125,130.05
258,888.55
6,993,669.34
6,277,218.80
1,467,045.44
4,860,237.90
5,307,297.23
1,444,815.15
1,463,150.08
854,563.32
130,986.07
16,575,684.97
1,092,715,36
3,302,729.36
1,020,732.34
756,264.50
1,604,605.83
1,219,233.13
669,179.64

Deposi ted.
Sent. 1-21.1936
$
609,167.34
207,560.09
334,992,42
8,626,390.63
7,690,194.07
1,801,588.86
6,291,813.75
6,236,770.30
2,704,414^04
1,528,569,93
1,556,278.53*
252,525.86
20,636,273.62
1,585,584.04
4,244,855.92
1,533,278.28
891,698.60
2,273,077.88
1,366,979.02
733,526.50

4,986,143.77
9,233,478.65
11,370,482.40
2,500,083.90
157,508.59
4,324,907.58
1,685,777.11
241,413.41
793,588.78
226,596.35
496,866.75
1,438,226.74
9,713,433.64

5,762,965.31
12,398,103.22
18,251,312.35
3,138,243.00
254,961.80
4,213,786.51
1,883,158.10
301,749.31
756,182.39
319,368.33
511,827,48
1,516,473.31
11,021,381.25

2

■ -

CONTINUED
Districts

Hew Mexico
1 st New York
2nd New York
3rd New York
14th New York
21st New York
28th New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
1st Ohio
10th Ohio
11th Ohio
18th Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
1st Pennsylvania
12th Pennsylvania
23rd Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
1 st Texas
2nd Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington, including
Alaska
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Philippine Islands
TOTAL

Deposited
Sent. 1-20.1935

Deposited
Sent. 1— 21,1936

$

$

94,008.77
4,073,245.00
33,610,649.82
22,795,092.05
3,431,997.70
1,227,565.20
4,096,894.37
3,542,115.95
71,579.84
3,999,797.03
1,377,989.40
911,620.07
5,624,189.60
2,064,756.69
540,179,65
11,187,592.77
1,110,101.05
7,080,911.86
1,599,565.15
448,385.10
88,334.56
1,602,742.10'
2,300,255.60
2,499,813.73
252,475.87
176,935.55
2,484,069.34

124,414.86
4,516,487,00
42,887,286.19
28,105,125.40
4,658,243.97
1,037,573.63
4,874,001.15
3,436,577.34
90,324.76
4,411,444,67
2,167,597.60
1,012,374,47
7,854,558.82
2,626,813.19
689,513,98
12,875,562,68
1,208,855.60
8,892,823.95
1,960,329.69
417,356184
117,893,67
1,865,170.54
3,567,938.85
3,089,969,60
345,765,40
290,476.40
2,982,299,99

1,172,332.35
1,176,954.95
2,367,567.93
174,117.52

1,558,882,67
1,447,350.35
2,876,218.08
183,302.34

. f e e . 352.401.4s?

$283,607,585.72

♦Hawaii, Report of 9/16/36 used,

$oa* irter I* tteaterg * f

la f*#l#ria£ m M tièm m la pm&pmt# Égf rm m m ryt tei II allatete
m m Qf Iha %mm i&jft«tl«#
iafàt«## «ai arte tara ©r#ate %
«àm ifly

fri# » * ,

ìs ì I

mèmmà Wm 'ìmwàm »£ t i f i l i 0# M $ liig i I#

la#*#*#* là» amilmiamt t M M g mai II #tel&tai& I• là» teateait##
#£ $#« ia%«r«*t »mi#« «# «wsoatiilmì I#
tei II m tm à I#
*4Jm#fc

mm

é#li#r «te*sisg# *o làmi $mr «if^rtar# w n

là#!»

»11# I# iijpjij

smalli#» la formila state#»

#1 là wmgmé I# là# »»»mai aaste»#* « t e t e t e «é #^% a te i,
g a li a# II» Itaw pw y àmm m%n%rm m%mm là » O a ite H a### la « a iti# »
mm% Mi mm iat#*itei#i*iit tydmmm #£ ipapiteMt mai I# &«$#*lt»i wHà
là» fr# » p isy la là» ®mm* m lr te y é # $ # rlite la a#*# M a i l l a là»

a m m m s r I» f m s #»»*11«« 1»« 5* I àa*# atetegr ratente It Hi» ;?##»!•
Itliljr làmi II» trm m iff msp mi III»»» fte II
»pormiI#»#

tìméwà fmr

te

I# *smPm p la

tmffo*# »£ ptetaltaig t e éattar p # « l l t e t

ite atei «fatmli#»#* a» I à*«» iaAtaate «tea** «atei mal à# tata»
lata» W te pmp®m #£ teatriag i»M*

fm t e

m mm% t e a t t e # I# à^r a ll *? t e «arti*# prof*

fate g#14*»,»t* à& aataNteta #f te «t*ii»il## #£ latta»» af gali

I# t e

tw m m itim m

ammiri#« #§ t e « t e i raaaml» t e i «hifl» la

larga aaoaai« aaaattafttly tea fina# ano»#

la *»«$#### la

fare»« i«ptngtftC «a tei iatam&iiaaal %mXmm ù i pnya#»i# a£
all »»«airi»«* ta^ tetete gali «aaatltuia» «% a t r m ttm #£ t e
mwmmm

lalal tei #£ p!4 te*t mmm «mm g «atteri#* «te ranr* far astemi#«
imrtag lf$& a»l lavarla #£ gali lai# tediami, alte» p m l # lo
!?t€ »iUloaa, ami la t§|?- te te flrwl «la Steste tf lfj§ te te
forte m IwAmwm ateàar $|$$ allIte» #f gali«
I
la là#*# aaliar«« te. àapa tei r«a
«iti noi telimi# lo «pii» «sa if 1 mm «star
«ar farter*
ilter^y*

Steaiàl# irter E* fteasterg#
t a l

9/22/jS

l ^ t e » iteteà.

t e * Alitar i* T t e a a t a t g * #

M LtiA i t t e #

i f i « i & t e i ì§r « m

t a t e # r |# é |& fa

« it a I la

ttaHWiy fi» là# tinital lllliy nini#* «Magi affi#«« %r tette te#«««
tas&* f i » ’§ mmm ém pm itim g te f » t é m » fiir # § « « t a t a (« A I t e « « t e # f
©5*00 par firn mmm rnirnm Al» wtel «tal ata*$t» «te lift
®f m» fmmmÉ t e iM teU ac i t e r a i ém m m i t a fm m m p Wimmm ts
ite

fnàmml Mm&nm

tasfe*

S

éì& t e t a - m r

*«tata«tely e p i t e t a « # t e i

t a t e # # « ita $»11 M te ifite te * » w ^ 1 4 t i r t t t e t « « « tette« l i t e

&mXm% t e

0

M «te«t wtehte# ite te«ta*rff f a t e t e In tata

A t e a t e l a » t e t e m t a t e ? te f M f # % t e a « H ite.
# > M «atefite«##
M

ì à

^

$$m

—

te

te

— te#

I ìm lim m te «ni*#* te te ftte pte tf tea «atete t e tea
c l » . te t e j*r»««Éiat ^ f ® p i | t e «

i istn^Ni ?$«t r a t e te t e

«nate

puri «f f«wr tettlan te m w m m m p % m m «f $#34 fini te il» natte
« t a t e te
a# #ar f t n « i a « l t a l t a t e » # « f in fitte « * te
t e # r te »liliJ-i

wmmmMm

« t e i l l t r «f t e é#ìter te taf«* «f t a t e i a

«muNwin# m& te pteaaA te pte Aitai «f te tette in fatantetate
mm%m^ rfitetetaipi II t e tem m m m m rg te pacmIA «gali te tear
t e U n i t e Statai*

I a» t e «otte # t e #1 aa te t e wmmlzm «f
jprte # f 139*06 par tami«* * t e r » un# t e

jnmet

p t e # « * #t e t f i n t e

m * mrn t a t e te ita s a t e t e É m mi t e ¿ » li Ite l i f e j f » mmm te
f35MPO »* w r t «Mi t e »ter te te *>#s»ifciìttjr tei tea tentai
t a t e # t e tmmim ta ta a A m$ M i » «am p*% ttt«M y t e r g a li*

*tta
vmrnm ù f

te t e f in i latarpratatte* I teli«*® t e i t e «aa*
la t e t e «piate wm là #®$ìf<®.rA m la Ita « te te .l Ita aitata«»

mt$&r4

Una «? te fallar «tatofMat i**tantatlp te «tata te &%m*%wmm émm*

tatat

la Ita lattai «tata» tal te|M*i t a llit e « tir*

m m tm mi prim%

mri taamte3 a t e p

tea!* *

««Ir teXjtaS- « É J t e t e t e a » t e

t a l a t e t e pria#* « f «natta» «la#««» «sf «aaMtal«
Al««# tal «a# nn I t e T t a n A t e l a r i» «Itmlallag t e l a « # # t e t r i Ir t e

kan» &rte*ir i*

** ?

fh i* «motto** «M ««rtete «iftMili in te» taày «f |mr lattea*
•#«•» I# r*fl*»t a **Ì»»ajter*teìdin£ #t i l i * rol» te* fr«&*aiy play» la
international mmmmm%n of piè* tkoogk It is wtttOMp te «p m Ae aff
fip sg W f
« f |d H t f i t mptmm im I t «a # llip tl« & l g |§
tette saffte» te aparnttea» *feite* tesate ©a te© m r f «aa teay «^faor

te te parte«*#»* «y* te «ffitl f*»id*««&tdiy àiffaaaat ffro»
m * aff te© t en,

te Ite »f&faary

ÉÉp mmm ta «aft m ê »£ te# te&taft Stete®* ate iterates*» te «ni
m ê mi tte

Is m%Umm% o f «or in te rn atio n al telali©© # f

|sp«»l** Sten Ite ***# off *11 te» ttea* «. te» artett tié» «toote#
ttet af te» ítem* 9» te» teMi ||lpt ar vio* oar»«* arar »ap $to**
perite* ¡g#M mnm» te Iteattete te» ïwâmm» fin In flm I* , M »
imreteMi» te là# <mtte***y u#»#» of te» tent* mar I* an m % îtm & #&tn*
te* fraomair ¿»a» »»% tey »»y g»M oterosg it «a^iro* te# ©»tel ttas
iaporitag teste» or porto»# tm *V r* g»M ate 1 « it mm* (m xm^ûtvà
W ten) te te* froooss*^ (oici II, & »foto*
m ttlm n# or ffteord
1 Ä « teak»} ta naatens* im dollar# rmmlvml ta Item »ff «nrmwy
«r âapoalt«» Ste tra^ootloa t# mmaty mm of te* «tapa a««#*#»»? te
oalntel» 4naten$* ratet at a **l#»teâ l#*«l. fte ffxa&m&y- aooos?!«
»»à | l m $ » M at te» ##i«atei ratet Is ardor te prmmmt m dm fîm tim »
U m * in tettar
r»te<^ fterofor^* »irtmliy ali te» a»t
taparte o f i# !â la te te* t a f it e State» mm- smmimê tar te» ftaftm sp

la «soten«» for «»M «•rtifimtte*« (teU »out te Ite mi ted »tote*
% telata» aaoifat teak» or aomraatat* $te te»t o® mwmgkmÈ- mmmmt
W te» ffetaaal te*«rv» teak of Ha» fort 1» aot tealteaâ te ite teonaniy
tetetea«* m m à steli. ««rœte of ¡¡gl tapaitet |ii§ aro lit for ta»
teatri«! pwpoa**»)
It lo «atim^r ríatelo teat fro® U m te ite» «tea te* «itetelo»
m m^ÊÎmM* te» fyaaanrr mgr* otte tente te ite stefctttrattom rana*
rntmm t e « im a ti* » » a» te » « » te « # » « mSete te r te »
* f « I t e m i»
tei «wiwrwfoitoö. flaatoatlmia I» o©r oarikuiaa** Um«« aporatloao »■#tañóla»
sa tk» n»M aastmt^ tat %%wh »psvatioa» wmnXê %#
tek«« aot ter te»
of *mii»tri«g pié* tel ter te»
of «iV
^ m M ïm tte fm m iiim of tea Sallar rite lafamsaa to ateár @«3rsr»ael«i#

I «Ami I «ait te a tak h ataol Sotetla of tea o^rotto«»* o» I | i « i
y«« «r* oooaom oâ l i l i « I t e te » «m orad
i» M a ia a d t e te#

üoa* àM tàmr % fm à m im tg

hmêu mi fmmim fcaü ara ta là# « I M M S * » %ïm% mïmm. fmm Wm
tm% Um% Immlmm aoaâttio»* tota taprootû Im U m UftMM flotta éw *
lag ihm jail Iharm rotta* If mm iMÉMlt* m m v m f M l m i M m
pia**» md If mkftêm# I» mm M i « j m ^ n m M A » I fitti.#
la#« faralgoara m à i

ìmm

l

m

M

l a w of W u t r tacitai la ««r

mrlllii»
io

ìmm m

Um

M - M

f M M

mtlim«

la i m i

la foratili

mmmm of ligoté «fallid # m m otMotto* floté far

éopoalt il will « M i m t la ottanti f á M

n

#soâ
If maalrlaMI

foroiiP I t t M l m f e a I» U » Îftâtêi H a i # « ìsm âwmé mêê*tmMm§ Um
tffaatif» M
li t««i M o l l o » wMafe w m M $?mi Um pm$m

mtf

t*

sdmtçmi*
» % ! # » ! «sfilai

mommmiê*

mn%m% Um m m *Mía

«ni tare» tf Iota**

1t*a ptu m af âoiMrtosa. «tmitAtt 1% of «rara** U«* «a#« amilmr
Um p®&*¿m¡*m i» m àmmteæ* «M paya wttà A**rio*o dollar*, at I* a
forol^oar ä ® ooatati* Mil a m osafraaay talo dollar# at Hi* # w m l
rata# of oxateg^#» tolls. pqr lia « t
of dollar*, m ä m dollar
la Un» Miào of aaaà M * U ni m m psmhmim& pmmw la ttaa ttoit#* Moto**
Il Is Into tt*&t Urn ftratotar la Miao* turn amatarlo# i o n ourtaaay
ho« «g&raoiataé la taina tf ila» tallar p » ¿mmïmm $mm tallara irttfe
M a owo owroaay» lot Um% 0 m » Ma ## ^wj*t*sga la $oâNîMMof Äotrl*®»
aootirttio* aloe« la aamMtt M « tallar átvlAaaá« or 1otarast* or
t a lla r

m roaooéa

I f

fea

t a lla

fe i«

w m r & tt# t#

1 st a m a t o * *

took a p ro ^ rtia a o to ly « m ila r mmmmi a f Ma tan mmmmp that «onM
M Mo# ib» toa# M Ma mirrali«* ta l «ppotloltâ* fisa sut* «éto»*
la*» fea
allato «Ufe M t «»notar la M Ma jauoMaar of Ámrímm
0Mé£ or «arrio»#* #a #tio aay «ftaiaé Molti fra® M a Ofprtal&taâ
awal«g» M

«*aal Iogurt gioia fm m U m W k t a é ftolta*

Wm*

¥$màwùmr% m % *

èritear S*

m iilin g

ìmtmmm mtimim fmm I f t ^ t t la & t * im m m iim a ,
mi § # M # m k ì $ fmeWbmr m im m g # M wwmrm® égr

sul

in H v t t s l è m & m *

110%

1%

fc#tt#r

Imi

Wom in

t§31 t#

$m:' pmmmiitm aàanmw affati
*# ma ìmm+ ia w&éiHm tm
mmt » $
f#àmtl

tta®t w#

am mm fm

hnM
NmA m r à m m iln w m m m fmm

ttat mn&
tè#
tarsi*»»

mmmpmw l ar$# p M miiMmmXa*
^mmmmà. tgr ita* fvm&mxr &®gmrb~
g^lè wmm&rm m& m

fta M lfta rtla a i f%mà mf %m *1111#« èm tl$m m p-m im ltf e#*#i#é ty
§#*&*## 1»
« i mimimim « ia M lliy # f tè # M II mp« fttar i osili
j w r m i t i l i » $&$* t* tèa m aiim $ i tè a Jéo^M #£ Orn##«*# mi Hi#
ft#*#*#* % * I m w
f s t o iM k i* »

m

M Ì ? l^tà !a*f*A#i»g tèa tsgtòi

mpmvv

» ##*

0 # # # f t è a $ # 1 1 * # « * #,« I f f é t o t a é : *§r t è a « p e t a t l # # è # ! # # *

t& Ì|; fmm Hi#
mém *y t è i BpmtA * f ##**»#11## #£ tè a Hsé#»#!
M ^ara#
$ t tè a ti» # tè a #É% ##* tafe#«* mm la ta w è iìl# # a
«^«tanUtòl paoÀU»
tèe! la tè#

m là m

mf tè# «sa#«* m m m s #
mm% fm àa ##**# iafttr

« s w * 1m *1 tgr tèe t**it#wiafi
« I t M r m m fra# tèi# # # » i t y

#®M «inaia to» uaé# ONtlly « J t j i i x # fa r #%p#rt « in ta n i m t« rl* l a f tm i

m mm mmw materni*
* Ì fc i# # * t l * i i « 1 1 « !» * # # ® « « a t a s s i# # £ p n a a iV tm l& J u r t e n s

# f # iit «spati#&<*& a p a ti mf Un# «ai####

grammi

I#

mmm%iw»$ mi

$3 »000*300*00® «*& #g*##l«É t# la#*»»##

t # iw&yrtjr t è m # « é *S a b m X t é l i t i # » # * y ih # i l # #

t è i#

a it i# »

t# fc # e

#££#©i* fta*## «*###® mmwm® ìm$m- mmX%né mlmsmt m iixélg
fmm tè# im flm «f spili fr#m
##t fwm Wm
jpa.ll#y #f mmwrmimg fall
tè# ®m®Mm mmtì
mmimìmmmi* mi m W
aaatitl-««, H d #
sa>#«y
« iiilm p M i

®tìm

a i t i I mi m w iim m é *

§ m % m f t é # m m m a im m a r m a W n m m lim & m tim é I # m $ m r *

ftm m fm aXl pmmm% «r
###d# #f
$M
m i mm %m mbmtbmè ut tèi# ila# witltcìat
m m f mima m i. » lila N t t r^#tri#tlir#
nmfàmr bmm*
pmatiaalty « 11 mf «4it#è m » hmm far m m ih m m^fimlmni r^>
m»r*mn m à ìmXmmm wiifa mihmr %mkm %# mm% té# Imfm-m®+m
% m «a# f^#tb#r Hi#
mrnsmHiXmm pamfomaè. éy
t%pr**®mi m
mmrnmil* fh# »liMalatl.#» #td@è ma? è# tali
te hmmm òmm glmm %m %$m tmmnfmr mf mmrimtm ammrìiimm ini® ili#

too* árttor S» V M M

mwik

«

1% i t l i g i
la f§ÉÉ i m i it e ptU tltftX âfitaafttotete
la tero?# Má Im tätet orimat iltN iff#«##
I f it e major «om*ta*!f
p # M «om ftem itef t e t ^ t ar* ette* â f &isê i f «Äss# tet^ rte iii mammt*
«dm f «mitra alitami #te» * mtäM
« • mir
im ### m
ta fia * mf * ä H ä o f it o amatimi to te é lat» «tarn toa# im tè# ite *
t f «*1A Im tè# jü iit ter## fmm* 1t aatoá t# &a #*teiX #»i té ta c
ter ihm H altet timte«* mm t a l i ma IW l i t to r li» I f mate tomate
«tornii m m m jnmmu I m m m t m mm14 mg#m itat m mmM. b*mfl%
te to lé tfte to » tetäi tiim m tlr mat i s t i ramila* fr»» «mm m to r te Bpiaam»

ftomto II t# l»f*»«i%tt te ftetomli täi« i^$ftxi**te «stornai ff
gtM t t o i I« Ufemia te ita * « tè i# amami«? im tUm « m i tè# A r f t ta*

^sartatmit «taor ataaat* it Gppmm tmiwlf «artet» tèmi tè# « ü I
m r msy «tori fattesi amali o#a#iltete m atoll pmpertiem
tf tur itimi IfHt tolti*«#« la tè# firm* plato» a ter$# mai grtolog
fatilo» #f tè# #tori*tef« tallar ItäiMt tot* ter# % £t«#i§*«i# I#
i&todad mm «NMÉrt-m^ tmaâm* f'iià um iu&immmimmt im «atoll irai#* ft I«
mai taproWfcl# ttet ito toitteyf tel*«#* tolto mmkà te togê tea#
will i M m i « mtoaâlr* km thm gi¡t#p§ plmm* m ter#» part af ite
fte#l$a lattatemi Im tmr ««tariti*# amaaaatota ItaiHlaMi
la ter teteatagf aâft stolte mitilitasi «ai will am amrm km
limitai«*!, if tamiltta&a ïm m m ateamé item aamtt l«t**t»*ai« la ite##
matototiaa te toarla#*«* la ite tètri fin«#* thm amartela toaliRaitaa
tf «Oüfiitot# la ite pollita#! mal
atteinte tf B*arap* 1»
mal litote ta tete il««« a t t o l ite %mlfe tf tteaa «te
ter# |&teteifatai la ite fit#** f tm ttoir ors aatfaaaia# ta ite ÉtHrnt*
Strafar#* ihm «atara af fast* tf tèmi tept rili litoti»# è# «pi it t*
tarate owr aangr amatte# f ltrtoMMI W r»pater*i te*a t*tei ä m w im m m
atB^tojUt itk^mmtmait# tf fimi*
im jém m è? i#c i» tatrl*
tè# iW ^ r a

llam ctm itm »^

I m isr#r# tlm t u l f l t t t f ftM t r t r a f t # a t a t è t ü è# ètatjr» i l
item ld m% a fftm t tè #
t f t e r t r a i l i km»#* Ut# ##«mt# #m
r # f» r i t la I f 31 # tr # lm«dl|r ttm i^rslkl#« fè# a m «r#r# tu th #
«f m #è#rf étalixNi la ti#«fe p rie m m à *%«!##«« «etiti%# tt m p m ttoim
e t Àlmppmrieg p r a ftit» Wmfe fa lla r » # « a i t i è t r lim ttr a ^ la ^ fa tta « # * !
tè #

« itä s f& ttm

mm

m mr? àittmmmt pietwtm*

to rto ra rf

®m t f

ito two lM*rtfifit t w w « of ^tli árala# ttot
te lf|l fe€ to««s
mltelmatoé» toter« 1 J|| ito ft^r* «n^imêtrtâ to a #t##r# o#t»«rà érala

of gtil rotmltmi te m Imtoxml U m tf ^#14 tete eirealmilt» m á torniift*
inai mw tmrrmeyt it a*t eoa»#rtltl# tete gß%&
ter pmpe®m of

tm * M m m S* rm ém fc#*# ~ 3 ~

(4) JRmà

togr Inmtmmmimf farri#* %mé» im targar

miàilag

érti«* torni#»«** io I# to#$?i la Amnrtmma Iste* t d tarmi#$
ma %-màmtm» Omr im itim i!# » !, tr$À* &»rtmg fjft9t «ut Sf;J§

tornito*
im rm -m à » mm**ftoiiNl «*#r Ito# :
t * pNir* sterri***« li i» t#
to# « Q i m m M i timi ièi# fns#i#r

mtwm

«f far#!®* ir»*# t r m w *

*$tiom* M M i ##11 Ite t&r$*r **mfci*m M & m ? 'Mimmm*
ftj ite» r*****fli*m im 1|ft «ammiri«* fctoramd, «f *omfl*«a>»
il«* #f sM$«rlaf #r mf tmmm tìsfàm#L i*ftali#m mf itomi» t*m#& #wrramai» U4 &®rtwm -tèi# pm%®& %o a ¿tifiti mf «m$Si«l fra# *«*
#f ito# «emiri#® «tei# #*«**•!* md jmtiilm#t •iimmllixm hm %mm
ikrm im m à

%

4Ì*itsrtoiMs### m ite « è t t e

79*

**m 4#m foll«t* f t e lt if t * »

(f) torniti», fted* » 1 im tèi* emmmtry to» itpmmmimtemv im
ito# l«ap# mr

tte t »

mmhmm P o tili n à ti to# paHfòtim

if «te team ito# warwomim mf itelr «ammiri«« hmmm A*pr«#lmi#A
Im teti*» #f ito# M l m
ftet# &r# ito# «me### wiì|#to mmm% im m%% mi Ut# mattimi la»
fi***» f«A Ito#«* «mpil&i in fim a wm%>à m% ìmm mmXimé Im wmb
tw rm mstm to»in£ è m Im ito# Sfati*!. itili## wmtm li mai far tè# »imi«!
**#t*il#a *f tm m lm i*teplts#aii li» Matte*»#* ito#»## im ito# jmam
p tim t* ite &mpmmim 9 «natimi fteWifm Sirr#*liwai» to» àrnm ìm m mf
asr* totem a tonti** tettar# *#r# e # » « , . ni«## tfgft ito«

«mas

is***t*d «Marni ìm m team a#gll#ttol«t **r im#* il «mpHur itomi ito# tutti#
fiat#® «ili mjpsfvsmmto im 'tè# m m Itemar* ito#
«mimate *f
ftemtmm
itomi ito# *«i
im ktm i##fe ito* ftom #f
fmitoar ito#* *•«*« ani. «#rfi$it, m# «tósi mmtiimtt,» to# ito# #in# in ito»
t*»* ta# li
'peMkr i# ito#
#ml.
#f ito#
*HI#to « 4 # Il

m m

t

f

t m

Ito» temd*

m à

m r w i m

mdjmmiMMi #f

tat#r*mii#*#l tomi#»#® t* fVflHMNNH ^ammitoly« pirli» i# Ito# f#*i ilwl
*• iw» ¿mti
ff#s m »mmrm
m à wmm9 lÈmm£mtmw
m i mkim$ fmll m » ff mmr #r#4it f#^##msp###*
*to* firn**» f m #11 # #f f#r#l®m mxéirnm Im Ito# Mli*i timi#* mr#t
t tornii###, «mfeitolimll» «#rr#«i, tomi itomi» lampiiimi© mltmmli tom m#
m m # im mtiun* ltog^t amtmti|r9 Im ito» ftmNfmiamii«* mf
armili
p#U«r moamimm* ami #mr#fiil. miimmtim I# fi#» i# Ito», 8m m iém & iim
9f lto«ir matem^mp m à «tgnifimaamm ami mf ito# pktìIm i I m $m li mf «mr

# » # i ^ p » im * m « U t

itosi ito*»

»

I t e t i l#

mmtlwmè.

i m ä x U m l. fm àm ìm tg * i

M s m$- ìmmrnUm%m tfcar S Ä *mt* im -ptm im m fmmm*

&Î

tim t m s f t ir

f#r»l*g» «muMI. «üpliil- la thi» ##i98ii*T isa# M m « t a p t s i i far a

t#
«ná
M f « * mm%mj mmmtmimtp
mlmutèmm* má m «itili i t îmmfc Im Mmrlmm mmcrttl#* itmmxm ©f IImi

M M #

p m m m t mi marnimi® imptmmmml i » là» tM M limititi*
«

tb s m m m r fei gtet#

i * g iv m m ê m ( i ) ,

tm » ^tMellaii t«®# I tiá x k , fetal 1» t it iv m i br »

tim «lw*ti«a « f

ta@*Hti Imiti' tfea tteltaA flfeftfeas» f t # 1» «ti

tfe» aa*##«. *f
Í»ÍÍ.#9nn.

{aì
rnì%M.mm from «totiaA fey i » f l « i aimers
immmm a# Ib a ^ n r
« r Its® mar# s lt e s s llw tim M

im

mffmmá

M t

%fea « * ÿ i M at

h&m*

%ti U ms b H U «teta» * ü k a# W

ftm

r**mm a#

li««#

lafi 'Ä#

i©

«► la» tif amara»* ma inètti**lian «f iba ratalim»

airaaictti ## ettr iNNttittitgr «Ml a# t&ê |t m lU « g m m f têmmm i»
Üta filar* «f AiMvvititi« MNMfelfj' ami âmaria^m flmsmet«! ia*iito-

%imm*
(fe)

tm à ** «ami la ib i* m m % w W im m tm **1* wl# ifk tia ia a

fai! Itei t e t e

titin rs

rnamlMm

affatiti a ts#i?f§ a U « U f i «r » r #

ti|s |« rlm ilr M

H Ü tMNMtttMiti am dlafrl« la

ifeaa attiaabara«
(«} $a$s*sftifeti«# % 1 fas'ai#*#?* a# «a»a a# Um M m tgm «Mtit*
II#» whi©b A»«ria«m» bsâ i w b t s â èariag il» ftiatMsar l i Â
«ÉÉt «ara aea ¿La* ta gal riti «f tifa» «% Iti* fiatiti* fbl« «a*
partíala itrljr feMt *# ife® tiaastiiÜaa a# «attoi« ©©«atri«« wimm
«•«Itttiil bltijb «MititiC» fatti» «tifa «aaplaê sritit êtitii««« wlitiWêf

iÜMti mati«i3a.ia a# in atti « m a iri« « m m
I# r»p&t r ia i#
là#»# «titititiU ti» a l im mmbm0t- pmf%%
timaati&v«ti# mt «bava
ti# i s l l «arata# mm prmiâmà i m m lp im tm rm X tf Im i
«al far fferatg» iaXtiara*

9? âmt

issatati

I llKV
wl%l» |Mf
tá¡f tkat if«

mêmm§ê

g» |i

##Ii mmrmmt* I« m l mm Hm% mm Im
trm lm à la * p&mgms$k m twa, f$m m m hm îm mt
#£ la*
tavaaifaaal ■pmymmt* «fetali 0 iïm wîm ta & M « t m f Ä M « # er Ie««e*
e m im l tanks m à ®mwxmml* i* m w plm m â In tim im i, tat f&m
fwestlea« essasi ta

mt %kmm Im&mimX

«essersi «ilta&i

a sfælt*

m m mmlâwrt&ltm

* will fast sita j m r essersi

tn^ßtrp

W tsktae wp j«mr speetfl* faesite*« la Ita aviar la «blök m
fresasi ttas.

, iJJK B Iw *1
ü â i f S « »et #»M
<w«a»««ft ü
■KW® a iU ta M i mâ m lîrn im e#M pmâmMm
#£ ®m S fa tisi
ih* m m r s r ie * m» mppmm&mlmlp $i*fT5 MUimm* ®mm
w

impart® wmmêM.

tta W

i

p m & m U m mi mm &lâ (mmlmUm mi

mm M ftpftt) V sta u * U*lMl a ftU io M .
ikê « M a l p i t i # f rm x f* * « tte * I t m l #1ear* taM Im m tli
mm®%, mi m m m , mmmê i t a t a l m m ûm m tMlmmUmml mmmmm
immmrnk m ü M fla w s s o a iit it s i# I ta esafMgaasMMPff t is s e s * i& mm
ta ta » » # e£ l*s*sf»»ttei**l iw iM iiu
• £ • • jrwft t o # la

mM

m í

ita Ä

S e t I f f imi- 1 p reesa s t# t a 'Um
e£ f e

«m

m

i

,

« i e e l? th a t pm*Um # f I I
$m #1 w á i n rsfaw la a s w k « v« U 1
tr s a s s e ite s « * f e n it a m m m I s l i a i lim Issa * # p l | e f i t a gsM
tlmm mm m l rrnml'm I m mlltmmml mi ta t e s t* * * r t« ü if m l # f 1 ^ '
f s r l s # «*$*#***♦ p r in t » « m zvU m , i s » 1 s t e s i t a i tare** t e t e r a s * Ä
a A ttssee*« tatara**« 11 v ita ta « * mâ m & rllm M m
si# » * feat
* »#1 t e s t * wm m m l a f
H i t M w sasal #£ ##&!»
i s l was p w r ilf a t %im im U U lim # f MmvUmm, isupiljr a l
la t lla llw
#£ f a r s i M s v 1#m s fw im m ai i» f Ü C a lis i .H ala« saaa

~3~

ÍB)

le it aseeseary to continuo t© fcuy sil of the w o r M #e proferred golá
la order to m í s t a l a the artificial priee of $35 por orneo; asá If $e, eaa
you estirante the poeslble lose to tho United States if the baying censes
má. gold retaras to a world priee?

1 feol like apologisslftg to yon for lntruáing t^oa your tiae and geod sature
with a necee sarily lavolved fuoetioaaaire of t M s charaoter; but 1 am earaestly
saá elneerely eoarchiac for ligfrt upca theee relatad subjects, asad the Seeret&iy
of the freneury seesis to be the oaly perecía whe eaa respond sathorite tively to
tlaie quest for iafoimtloa*
1 «hall %e l&áebted feo yon for your reply - at
v m h lea&th a» yon e&re to arito - at your earliest conven!ence.
fith eontiaeats of great respaet* I beg to resala,
fit& «ara personal redarás and %e|l vicios.

Oordi&lly and f&lthfully,

4. 1« Tsadeaberg; (signad)

MS<ÊÊ*

ü&m |pîâ production ©f the world «uà
®nce w r Internat ione! confère©.

wmsk mare %immi w&s

necess&ry to hai-»

ffe® i w M k k question a a t n r & U y «risos as t© how and
tais oould hsppen
'
correct). Whereupon it iarje&iately h©c©?a©g important to
a*other r®P°r*
th® B q p a r f c M t of t e m e r e ® lesued on Orano 6th.
end «ntltled *F©r«ign Investente la the liaited States«* Bits shows
t&at et ta® end of 1935» fcreign holding» in this e m m i r y maouated to ta®
attendons rat of $6,235,000,000 of which $1 ,200,000,000 mm lu hanfc halan®®«
ano othor short-tora fundí, # 2 ,015 ,000,000 In e©s®oa stocks, #129 ,000,000 In
preferred stocks, and #607,000,000 in honds.
If th® stores and honds are
practicelly ail U s t e d (as 1 under»tend to h® th® faci) this represente a
total of $4,151,000,000 in forelga holding» vhieh can h® callea for at aay
moment hy their foreîgaa cenere. fhe péril to our osa donasti® situation
in such & contemplation w o d d %»m to h® quite ohvious hee&use if «® ha®®
nnythlsg U k ® $4,000,000,000 m instant forsîga sali, our financia! structure
m & m r pris® structure r®st to a coasid®rahl® extent on foreign ■ £
®r
caprice. Bon® of ns sili forgot ho® th® w i t M r w m l of foreign ttmâe »«**
salane®® In 1931 deaerai i*®d our stock market®,. shook: sur hsnks and deepened
th® rigore of th® dépréssion»
^

5 ^ ? 1®aàs m®
«Potion# whieh revolee arenad th® general proposition
/â Ϋ!W
fsreign gold at an arbitrarily high domesti® prie®
I d j U h e m t e l y set hy ns) is responsible for this international Investment
sitmtioai and that uni®«® stoppe* «ili smltiply our serlou® American Jeoparto
^ 1 1 ® als^ sraltlplyiag foreign profits at American expense. If these tu*,
pl lest ions and conclusions are in error, I a» aurions to hâve the authentic
démonstration of it. Iherefore, with this premise la miad, 1 asks
(1 ) la 193b and 1935
cur gold Importation exeeed, flrst, the world1»
production of as® gold, and, second, th® transfer nocess&xy to baiane© our
internat io nal accounts-î

{2)

For what vas thè hai enee ased, and «hai does li repressati

(3> t e s it noi represent the stisral&ted movestent of American seeurities
lato th® hands ef foreign holders?
t1») Boa» not ovr eoatlaued parchase of »orld gold at $35 ®s ouaea *i*e
l 01-? 1? 1 hol4*r* «f « ® W *® « A m a t a , » la parchaela* posar la sur «aaurity
«»iketa orar ám rím m baldara of papar dallar»! aad lf so, boa machi
Boa «
fi n u m a r

10b a t
***

thl» f o r a l a gola la 1931» aad 1935 aaa boa«,t %

í ” R*ttI7

the Sreawwy?

l»»lâ for aaá be* aera «be porebaaaa

(T) *bat la tha fresata, dala, *ttb tho lapart
le thè edvsnteg® of coniinulng this pclicyt

«

tiras barai aad «bat

W X f ® 8SAH8 SSKdfg

/

Cosaittee oa Fereign Belations

Sapida, Mitigali«

Septeaher 2»A, 19 3 6 .
/

Boasrabla loary hergsatha», Jr »#
fr©ss«ry Pepartaent,
Washington, P. ۥ
Hr dear Iter. Seeretaryi

w *»«r io f cospreaeaazts acatar «ad conclusi®».
I ai coactael te Irast i&t «ffeet ®f as? gold pur chas* poi leles as hearing
apon » • edrlsabiUty of eontlmil^ to b«jr foralgn g®IA &t aa *rtitr*rlly
«ahaaced donasiio prie#.
Fr®*
« m e l a i fidare# as are p u b l i d y avallale« i% «oaid s o m to b«
a fair deduciion that tòilt
cannot fiad lie ae&ns te pay car sar
™ t s , ii eaa asá dees fissi thè seaas le bey ©ur seearities; asá li «culi
ai leaet ti^srfieially eppeer that our esa gold parchase prograa aei o n \y
emeourages ihle procesa bai alee subsidiaos ii ai ihe sapease ©f ihe
¿jnericaa people.
Figures issued by ihe Department ©f Commerce far Igjfe «ad 1935 (la reperti
ioiesa as Balance ef Xatern&t tonal Faymeats) and figures Issaci by the
Federal Besarte Board o» eerld geld produot Ion are the prlmary basta «pea
«hieh this l^potto»!« eould resi - rsmaborlag aleo that ihe Tre&sury Bepartmeat (vlih ihe approvai of the Frssi&sat) aaaeunced ea Jaataaxy 3lst,
*93*» that ihe followlng áay ii eould bsgla te bey aay
»13 «oíd ai ihe
rata ef $35 per ornee (iaetead ef ai the rata of $20.67 preriously ebtained).

0,1 fch* ***** «f «***• figure* li eould appear that la 193** car leerla and
pur chases of foreiga gelá (ai ihe ase prlee) aere $1 ,217 ,000,000 stelle the
satire eerld geld producilo» that year «as $963*3$9 »000. la othsr «orde,
mtr leerte ef geld (ai ihe ase prlee) exeeeded ihe eorld productloa. Ii
eould else appear that ©ur importe exceeáed by $ 085,000,000 asy aaouats asees*
«ary te balaaee commercial truasaetloas.
píese saos figures for I935 eould appear io show that «e reeelTed
É l foreiga geld (as coapsreá elite a eorld geld produeiloa of
#1 ,044,©72,000) aoao of which «as aeeessary io balaaee comercial tr&as&ciloas, la eiher «orde, es bonghi aad paid for mubh mora ihsa ihe entire

»

»
sd).

I
»

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Friday» September 25, 1956»
9-24-36.
-

Press Service
N o . 8-52

Secretary Morgentha.u today made public the following copy of a letter

addressed to him by Senator Arthur H* Vandehberg -of Michigan, together with
a copy of his reply to Senator Vandehberg:

UNITED STATES SEI-TATE
Committee on Foreign Relations

Grand Rapids, Michigan,
September 2nd, 1936,

Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Jr,,
Treasury Department,
Washington, D, C,

.■ •

?
*'v- ' '¿Æ
‘;'g ■

; ■.'

My dear Mr. Secretary:

• •
|
’
I am taking the liberty of submitting a few specific questions to you herewith; and I shall deeply appreciate your usual courtesy in giving me what­
ever information may be available. Except a s .the Treasury provides this
information, it is impossible to,have a complete presentation cf the subject
matter for comprehensive study'and conclusion.
I am concerned to know the effect of our gold purchase policies as bearing
upon the advisability of continuing to buy foreign gold at an arbitrarily
enhanced domestic price,
.
%
Erom such official figures as are publicly available, it- would seem to be
a, fair deduction that while Europe cannot find the means to pay our war
,debts, it can and does find the means to buy our securities; and it would
at least superficially appear that our own gold purchase program not only
^encourages this process but also subsidizes it,at the,expense of the
American people,
* '
^ „.-1 *
Figures issued by the Department of Commerce for 1934 and 1935 (in reports
known as Balance of International Payments) and figures issued by the .
Federal Reserve Board on world gold production are the primary basis upon
which this hypothesis would rest — remembering also that the Treasury De­
partment (with the approval of the President) announced on January 31st,
1934, that the following day it would begin to buy any and all gold at the
rate of $35 per ounce (instead of at the rate, of $20,67 previously obtained)
On the basis of these figures it would appear that in 1934 our imports'and
purchases of foreign gold (at the new price) were $1,217,000,000 while the
entire world gold production tha.t year v/as $963,369,000,
In other words,
our imports of gold (at the new price) exceeded the world production.
It
would also appear that our imports exceeded, by $885,000,000 any amounts
n e ç ^ s a r y ttp,:^alfmcQ commercial transactions.
These same figures for 1935 "would appear* to~show that we received
$1,739,000,000 in foreign gold (as compared with a world gold production of
$1 ,044,472,000) none of which was necessary to balance commercial transact­
ions, xIn other words, V-wg bought and paid for much more than the entire

-

-

nev: gold production of the world raid much more than m s
our international commerce.

necessary to balance

The immediate question naturally arrises as to how and why this could happen
(if my figures are correct), Whereupon it immediately becomes important to
review another report from the Department of Commerce issued on June 6th,
1936, and entitled n]poroign Investments in the United States , ’1 This shows
that at the end of 1935, foreign holdings in this country amounted to the
stupendous sum of $6,235,000,000 of which $1,200,000,000 was in bank balances
and other short-term funds, $2,015,000,000 in common stocks, $329,000,000 in
preferred stocks, and $607,000,000 in bonds.
If the stocks and bonds are
practically all listed (as I understand to be the fact) this represents a
total of $4,151,000,000 in foreign holdings which can be called for at any
moment by their foreign owners. The peril to our own domestic situation
in such a contemplation would seem to be quite obvious because if we have
anything like $4,000,000,000 on instant foreign call, our financial structure
and our price structure rest to a considerable extent on foreign judgment or
caprice, None of us will forget how the withdrawal of foreign funds and
balances in 1931 demoralized our stock markets, shook our banks and deepened
the rigors of the depression.
This leads me to my questions which revolve around the general proposition
that our purchase of foreign gold at an arbitrarily high domestic price
(deliberately set by us) is responsible for this international investment
situation; and that unless stopped will multiply our serious American jeopardy
while also multiplying foreign profits at American expense.
If these im­
plications and conclusions are in' error, I am anxious to have the authentic
demonstration of it. Therefore, with this premise in mind, I ask!
(1) In 1934 and 1935 did our gold importevtion exceed, first, the v/orld*s
production of new gold, and, second, the transfer necessary to balance our
international accounts?
(2 )

For what was the balance used, and what does it represent?

(3) Docs it not represent the stimule.ted movement of American securities into
the hands of foreign holders?
(4) Does not our continued purchase of world gold at $35 an ounce give foreign
holders of gold an advantage in purchasing power in our security markets over
American holders of paper dollars; and if so, how much?
(5)

Haw much- of this foreign gold in 1934 and 1935 was bought by the Treasury?'

(6) How were the Treasury purchases paid for and how were the purchases
financed?
(7) What is the Treasury doing with the import gold it thus buys; and what
is the advantage of continuing this policy?

3 -

(8) Is it necessary to continue to 'buy all of the world*s preferred gold in
order to maintain the artificial price of $35 per ounce; and if so, can you
estimate the possible loss to the United States if the buying ceases and gold
returns to. p
. world price?
I feel like apologizing to you for intruding upon y our time and good nature
with a necessarily involved questionnaire of this character; but I am earnestly
and sincerely searching for light upon these related subjects, and the Secretary
of the Treasury seems to be the only person who can respond authoritatively to
this quest fox information.
I shall be indebted to you for your reply - at
such length as you care to write — at your earliest convenience,
With sentiments of great respect, I beg to remain,
With warm personal regards and best wishes,
Cordially and faithfully,
(Signed) A. H, Vandenberg.

/

September 22, 1936.

My dear Senator:
I have your letter of September 2nd and am glad to comply
with your request for information regarding gold imports.
It is
well that you encourage me to write at length, for the subject of
international gold movements is not one that can he adequately
treated in a paragraph or two. The mechanism of adjustment of in­
ternational payments which gives rise to gold acquisitions or losses*"
by central banks and governments is complex and technical, but your
questions cannot be adequately answered without some consideration
of these technical aspects.
I will deal with your general inquiry
by taking up your specific questions in the order in which you ’
present them.
*(1)
In 1934 and 1935 did our gold importation exceed, first.
the world*s.production of new gold, and, second, the transfer
necessary to balance our international accounts?”
During the years 1934 and 1935 our net gold imports amounted to
$2,956 millions and estimated gold production outside of the United
States over the same period was approximately $1,775 millions. Thus
our imports exceeded the world’s production of new gold (exclusive of
our output) by about $1,181 millions.
The second part of your question is not clear. Gold imports
-'Cannot, of course, exceed the balance due on international accounts
inasmuch as gold flows constitute the compensatory element in our
balance of international payments.. 3ut if, as T presume to be the
c ase, you have in mind not the whole of the international account,
but only that portion of it which you elsewhere refer to as commercial
transactions, then the answer is that the larger part of the gold in­
flows was not received in settlement of balances a,rising out of im­
ports, exports, shipping services, tourist expenditures, immigrant
remittances, interest, dividends, and amortization payments, etc.,
but represented a net inward movement -of capital. This movement of capi
tal was partly at the initiative of Americans, partly at the initiative
of foreigners. Americans returned to the United States some short-term—

i

Hon. Arthur H. Vandenberg

- 2 -

funds and investments they had made in previous years. The transfer
of foreign owned capital to this country has been inspired for a
variety of causes-— political and economic fears, monetary uncertainty
elsewhere, and a wish to invest in American securities because of the
prospect of economic improvement in the United States.
*(2)

For

7/hat

was the balance used, and what does it represent?

The answer to this question is given under (l).
**(3) Does it not represent the stimulated movement of American
securities into the hands of foreign holders? n
Your question can, I think best be answered by an examination of
the causes of capital imports into the United States. They are as
follows:
(a) Capital withdrawn from abroad by American ov/ners
because of the greater security or the more attractive field
for investment offered the capital at home. The return of these
funds to the United States - much of which left the country in
1930-31-32 - is, of course, an indication of the relative
strength of our recovery and. of the prevailing confidence in
the future of American industry and American financial institu­
tions •
(b) Funds sent to this country by foreigners who likewise
felt that American securities offered a more attractive or more
secure investment opportunity than did investments available to
them elsewhere.
(c) Repurchase by foreigners of some of the foreign securi
ties which Americans had purchased during the post-war decade
and were now glad to get rid of even at low prices. This was
particularly true of the securities of certain countries where
nominal high exchange rates wrere coupled with devices whereby
the nationals of these countries were encouraged to repatriate
these securities at an exchange profit to themselves, or where
maintenance of debt service was provided for only internally but
not for foreign holders.

Ron. Arthur F. Vandenberg

- 3 -

(d) Need created "by increasing foreign trade for larger
working dollar balances to be kept in American banks bjr foreign
banks and traders, Our international trade during 1934 and 1935
increased by one-third over the two years -previous*
It is to
be expected that this greater volume of foreign trade trans­
actions would call for larger working dollar balances.
(e) Tear prevailing in some countries abroad of confisca­
tion of property or of loss through inflation of their local cur­
rencies led during this period to a flight of capital from some
of the countries whose economic and -political situation has been
threatened by disturbances with which you are doubtless familiar.
(f) Lastly, funds sent to this country by speculators in
the hope or expectation that an exchange profit will be possible
if and when the currencies of their countries become depreciated
in terms of the dollar.
These are the causes which account for most of the capital in­
flows. Yet these capital inflows would not have resulted in such
large sums being due to the United States were it not for the virtual
cessation of foreign investments by Americans.
Whereas in the years
prior to the depression, annual foreign investments by Americans of
more than a billion dollars were common, since 1931 the annual sums
invested abroad have been negligible; nor does it appear that the United
States will approach in the near future the pre-depression volume of
foreign investment. That the net capital inflow took the form of gold
rather than goods and services, as would normally be the case in the
long run, is due partly to the rapidity and magnitude of the operations
which made it more difficult for the trade and service adjustment of
intemational balances to proceed smoothly, partly to the fact that
we were just emerging from a severe depression and were, therefore,
not making full use of our credit resources.
The figures you cite of foreign holdings in the United States are,
I believe, substantially correct, but their magnitude should be no
cause for alarm, though, naturally, in the determination of our credit
policy constant and careful attention is given to them. Consideration
of their make-up and significance and of the pertinent aspects of our
monetary system will show that t h e y .conslitutejiQ. threal--±P„con±ajaued— — ■

Hon. Art huí' H. Vandonberg

- 4 -

recovery*
It is true that in the event the political disturbances
in Europe and in the Orient disappear, and if the major monetary
problems confronting Europe are solved, and if other important econo­
mic factors abroad show a marked improvement, we may expect to see a
reflux of a portion of the capital which has come here in the form
of gold in the past three years.
It would be an excellent thing
for the United States, as well as for the world, if such events
should come to pass.
I am sure you would agree that we would benefit
considerably, both directly and indirectly, from such a world improve­
ment.
Though it is impossible to foretell the approximate amount of
gold that is likely to leave this country in the event the above im­
provements occur abroad, it appears fairly certain that the amount
leaving over any short period would constitute a small proportion
of our total gold holdings.
In the first place, a large and growing
portion of the short-term dollar balances kept here by foreigners is
needed as working funds. With an improvement in world trade, it is
not improbable that the working balances which would be kept here
will increase markedly.
In the second place, a large part of the
foreign investment in our securities represents long-tei-m investments
in our industry and public utilities and will no more be suddenly
liquidated if conditions improve abroad than would investments in those
securities by Americans.
In the third place, the complete restoration
of confidence in the political and economic stability of Europe is
not likely to take place simultaneously among the bulk of those who
have participated in the flight from their own currencies to the dollar.
Therefore, the return of funds of that type will likewise be apt to be
spread over many months.
Even were the outflow of gold over a few months to be heavy, it
should not affect the adequacy of our credit base,
The events you
refer to in 1931 were hardly comparable.
Then we were on the taboggan
of a sharp decline in stock prices and business activity, to say nothing
of disappearing profits, bank failures and other discouraging features;
the situation now presents a very different picture.
Moreover, one of
the two important sources of gold drains that existed in 1931 has been
eliminated. Before 1933 the fears engendered by a severe outward drain
of gold resulted in an internal flow of gold into circulation and hoard­
ing; now currency is not convertible into gold except for purposes of

Hon# Arthur H# Vandenberg

- 5 ~

settling international balances arising from legitimate transactions,
and therefore exports of gold cannot further reduce gold reserves by
stimulating internal drains#
It must not be overlooked, furthermore, that we are n o w far better
equipped than in 1951 to protect our domestic economy from any possible'
adve^s© effect that may accompany large gold withdrawals# We now have,
in addition to the powers possessed by the Treasury Department and the
Federal Reserve System, abundant gold reserves and a Stabilization Fund
of two billion dollars especially created by Congress to protect and main­
tain stability of the dollar#
May I call your attention also to the
action of the "Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on July 14th
increasing the legal reserve requirements# One of the motives, as indicated
by the quotation below, taken from the statement made by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the tine the step was taken,
was to immobilize a substantial portion of the excess reserves created by
the inflowing gold so that in the event funds were later withdrawn from
this country gold could be made easily available for export without material
effect on our money market#
’’This action eliminates as a basis of possible injurious
credit expansion a part of the excess reserves, amounting at
present to approximately §3,000,000,000 and expected to increase
to nearly three and a half billions by the time this action takes
effect# These excess reserves have resulted almost entirely
from the inflow of gold from abroad and not from the System*s
policy of encouraging full recovery through the creation andmaintenance of easy money conditions# This easy money policy
remains unchanged and will be continued*
’’The part of the excess reserves thus eliminated is super­
fluous for all present or prospective needs of commerce, industry,
and agriculture and can be absorbed at this time without affecting
money rates and without restrictive influence upon member banks,
practically all of which now have far more than sufficient re­
serves and balances with other banks to meet the increases#”
You ask whether the American securities purchased by foreigners
represent a ’’stimulated movement?” The stimulation which may be said
to have been given to the transfer of American securities into the

Eon. Arthur H, Vanderiberg -

6

-

.Hw

hands of foreign holders is the stimulation that arises from the
fact that business conditions have improved in the United States dur­
ing the past three years.
If our business recovery had not taken
place, and ii confidence in our future progress did not exist, doubt­
less foreigners would have invested less of their capital in our
securities.
So,long as the United States continues to present to foreign
owners of liquid capital a more attractive field for investment and
deposit it will continue to attract such funds.
If unrestricted
foreign investments in tne United States be deemed undesirable, the
only effective check is legislation which would grant the proper
authority adequate powers to control the magnitude and type of inter­
national capital movements*
”& )

Does not our continued purchase of world gold at $35 an
foreign h olders of gold an advantage in purchasing power
,9ecuritY...:market si pvpr American h olders of paper dollars: and
if so. how much ?11
~~
-----------

CO

05}

The price of American securities is, of course, the same whether
the purchaser is an American who pays with American dollars, or is a
ioreigner who converts his own currency into dollars at the current
rates of exchange. Both pay the same number of dollars, and a dollar
in tne hands of each has the same purchasing power in the United States.
is rue^that the foreigner in those few countries whose currency
*.c.s appreciated in terms of the dollar can purchase more dollars with
is own currency, but that gives him no advantage- in purchasing America!
securities since in receiving his dollar dividends or interest, or
doilor proceeds if he subsequently sells his securities, he receives
ack a. proportionately smaller amount of his own currency than would
^eve been the case had his currency not appreciated. The only advanage ne nugho obtain with his currency is in his purchases of American
oo s or services,-rTo gain any special benefit from his appreciated
xchange he must import goods from the United States.
"(5)
Ife.Kftich
of this foreign gold" 1,1
in
1934
and
1935 was bought
tf
1 "'
1
.... ........ . .1... —— I. .1. ...■M
.wa *«
by the Treasury?M

Hon. .Arthur H. Vendenberg - 7 -

This question, and certain comments in the body of your letter,
seem to reflect a misunderstanding of the role the Treasuiy plays in
international movements ox gold. Though it is customary to speak of
Treasury •^purchases” of gold, the expression is an elliptical one
which refers to operations which, though on the surface they apuear
to be purchases, -are in effect fundamentally different from -ourchases
in the ordinary use of the term.
Gold moves in and out of the United Sta/fces, and therefore in and
out of the Treasury, in settlement of our international balance of
payments. When the sum of all the items on the credit side exceeds
that of the items on the debit side, or vice versa, over any given
period, gold moves to liquidate' the balance. The inflow is not a
purchase in the customary usage of the term, nor is an outflow a sale.
The Treasury does not buy any “'goId abroad; it acquires the metal when
importing banks or persons receive gold and turn it over (as required
by law) to the Treasury (via U. S. mints, assay offices, or Federal
Reserve banks) in exchange for dollars received in form of currency
or deposits.
The transaction is merely one of the steps necessary to
maintain exchange rates at a selected level. The Treasury accepts
and gives gold at the selected rates in order to prevent undue fluctua­
tions in dollar exchange rates.
Therefore, virtually all the net
imports of gold into the United States are acquired by the Treasury
in exchange for gold certificates.
(Gol'd sent to the United States
by foreign central banks or governments and kept on earmarked account
by the Federal Reserve Bank of Hew York is not included in the Treasury
holdings.
Also, small amounts of the imported gold are used for in­
dustrial purposes.)
It is entirely possible that from time to time when the situation
so requires, the Treasury may, with funds in the Stabilization Fund,
engage in operations on the exchange market for the purpose of eliminat­
ing unwarranted fluctuations in our exchanges.
These operations may
involve dealings on the gold market, but such operations would be under­
taken not for the purpose of acquiring gold, but for the purpose of safethe position of the dollar with reference to other currencies.
’.
'
tt(6) How were the Treasury -purchases, -paid for and how were the
purchases financed?n
I shall omit the technical details of the operations, as I presume
you are concerned only with the general procedure. Gold rained in the

Hon. Arthur H. Vandenberg -

8

United States or imported by some bank or dealer is deposited with the
Treasury via the United States mints, assay office, or Federal Reserve
bonk.
The person depositing the gold receives a check (at the rate of
$35.00 per fine ounce minus the usual mint charges and less one-quarter
of one percent for handling charges) drawn on the Treasury balance in
the Federal Reserve bank.
The Treasury subsequently replenishes that
balance Tilth gold certificates* or gold certificate credits, issued
against the g old metal received* The Treasury’s function in this
transaction has been merely to accept the gold and give in exchange
gold certificates.
“(?) Tfor-t is the Treasury doing with the import gold it thus
buys: and what is the advantage of continuing this policy?H
I believe the *answer to the first part of this question lias been
given in the preceding paragraphs.
I presume you refer in the second
Part of your question to our acceptance of gold sent to the United
States in settlement of our international balance of payments.
In
order to maintain reasonable stability of the dollar in terms of foreign
currencies and to protect the position of the dollar in international
monetary relationships it has been necessary to permit ‘
gold to-enter
the United States*..
"(3). Is it necessary to continue to buv all the world’s prof­
fer edg^o Id. in order to maintain the artificial orice of $35.00 per
ounce; and if sc. can you estkipa.te the possible loss to the United
..States if the .buying, c.ea.seg and, gpldTreturns to a world price?«
I am net quite clear as to the meaning of your phrase, ”artificial
price of $35*00 per ounce,” There are two possible interpretations;
one may refer to the revaluation of the gold from $20.67 an ounce to
$35*00 an ounce; and the ether to the possibility that the Treasury
enters the foreign market and bids competitively for gold*
With regard to the first interpretation, I believe that the conpensus of informed opinion would support me in the view that the revalua­
tion of the -dollar contributed materially to check the disastrous down­
ward course of prices in the United States and helped initiate an up-wpxd movement; a change which not only helped adjust the large and
growing discrepancies between the prices of various classes of commodi­
ties, but was an ihoertent factor in stimulating business activity and

Hon, Arthur H, Vftndenberg — 9 -

in restoring confidence in prospects for recovery; that it eliminated
some of the gross injustice "between debtors and creditors created by
sharply falling prices, and reduced the burdenrof debts by helping to
increase the national incbne; that it contributed to the maintenance
of low interest rates so essential to recovery; that it served to re­
adjust our dollar exchange so that our exporters were able to regain
their competitive position in foreign markets.
With, regard to the second meaning, as indicated above, such
gold as the Treasury does acquire enters the United States in settle­
ment of our international balance of payments and is deposited with
the Treasury in the manner already described in some detail in the
answer to your question Ho, 5* I have already referred to the possi­
bility that the Treasury may at times find it necessary to engage in
operations abroad for the purpose of protecting the dollar position,
but such operations, as I have indicated above, would not be under­
taken for the purpose of acquiring gold.
You ask whether we must »continue to buy all of the world's prof­
fered gold.,..?» An examination of the statistics of inflows of gold
to and from various countries 'of the world reveals that shifts in
large amounts#constantly take place among countries in response to
numerous forces impinging on the international balance<of payments of
all countries, Newly—mined gold constitutes only a fraction of the
total sum of gold that moves among countries each year. For example,
during 1934 net imports of gold into England alone amounted to
$716 millions, and in 1935 and the first six months of 1936 she im­
ported on balance another $700 millions of gold,
I appreciate your interest in these matters, and hope that you
vdll not hesitate to write me if X can serve you any further.
Sincerely,
(Si gned) "Henry* liongenthau^-J r .

JElonorable JLrthur H, Tancfenberg,
Grand Hapid^--4iichigan,'

2.
of its currency.

The Government of the United States, as also the British

Government, has

welcomed this decision in the hope that it will establish

more solid foundations for the stability of international economic relations.
The United States Government, as also the British and French Governments,
declares its intention to continue to use appropriate available resources
so as to avoid as far as possible any disturbance of the basis of inter­
national exchange|

resulting from the proposed readjustment.

It will arrange for such consultation for this purpose as may prove
necessary with the other twoJHovemments and their authorised agencies*
>4.

The Government of the United States is moreover convinced, as

are also the Governments of France and Great Britain^that the success of
the policy set forth above is linked with the development of international
trade.

In particular it attached the greatest importance to action being

taken without delay to relax progressively the present system of quotas
and exchange controls with a view to their abolition.
5.

The Government of the United States, in common with the Govern­

ments of France and Great Britain, desires and invites the cooperation
of the other nations to realize the policy laid down in the
declaration.

present

It trusts that no country will attempt to obtain an

unreasonable competitive exchange advantage and thereby hamper the effort
to restore more stable economic relations which it is the aim of the three
Governments

to promote.

fix

TU

w k i^ e ^ C ^
1,

Ua h Ci-'

U J ^ 4 ^ <4 Mji t^ 'A C M
f

;

The Government of "the United States} after consultation with

the British Government and the French Government, joins with them in
affirming a common desire to foster those conditions which safeguard
peace and will best contribute to the restoration of order in inter­
national economic relations and to pursue a policy which will tend to
promote prosperity in the world and to improve the standard of living of
peoples.
2. The Government of the United States must, of course, in its
policy 0

towards international monetary relations take into full

account the requirements of « • * * ■ • *

internal prosperity, as

corresponding considerations will be taken into account by the u overa­
ments of France and Great Britain; it welcomes this opportunity to
reaffirm its purpose to continue the policy which it has pursued in
the course of recent years, one constant object of which is to maintain
the greatest possible equilibrium in the system of international exchange?

0 g 0 k

and to avoid to the utmost extent the creation of any disturbance

of that system by American monetary action.

The Government of the United

States shares with the Governments of France and Great Britain the con­
viction that the continuation of this two-fold policy will serve tne
general purpose which all the Governments should pursue.
3. The French Government informs #

the United States Government

that, judging that the desired stability of the principal currencies
cannot be insured on a solid basis except after the re-establishment of
a lasting equilibrium between the various economic systems, it has
decided with this object t o/ropose to its Parliament the readjustment

TurnsURY D EPxARTMENT
Washington
Press Servico
fe* 8-53

IMMED iate release
Friday, September 25, 1936
for

By authority of* the President, the Secretp^ry of* tne Treasury makes the
folio-wing statement:
1.

The Government of.the United States, after consultation with the

British Government and the French Government, joins with them in affirming a
common desire to foster those conditions which safeguard peace and will best
contribute to the restoration of order in international economic relations and
t« pursue a policy which will tend to promote prosperity in the world and to
improve the standard of living of peoples.
2,

The Government of the United States must, of course, in its policy

towards international monetary relations take into full account the requirements,
of"internal prosperity, as corresponding considerations will be taken into
account by the Governments of France and Groat Britain; it welcomes bnis oppor­
tunity to reaffirm its purpose to continue the policy which it has pursued in
the course of recent years, one constant objeot of which is to maintain tho
greatest possible equilibrium in the system of international exchange and to
avoid to the utmost extent the creation of any disturbance of that system by
American monetary action*

The Government of tho United States shares with the

Governments of France and Great Britain the convicti-on-^that-tho---continuation
of this two-f’»ld~ poLicy -wouUL-'S-ervo' the_.gimoral purposc- -which all the Governments
should pursue.
3,

The French 0®vernment informs the United States Government that,

judging that the desired stability cf the principal currencies cannot be
insured on a solid basis except after the re-establishment of a lasting equiXi-brium between the various economic systems,, it has^P^cixled-^withr'd:hhs object to

2

propose to its Parliament the readjustment of its currency*

The Government

of the United States, as also the British Government, has welcomed this
decision in the hope that, it-will establish more solid foundations for the
stability of international economic relations*

The United States- Govern--"'"

ment, a,s also the British and French Governments, declares its intention to
continue to use appropriate available resources so as to avoid as far as
possible any disturbance of the basis of international exchange resulting
from the proposed readjustment.

It will arrange for such consultation for

this purpose as may prove necessary with the other two Governments and
their authorized agencies«
4*

The Government of the United States is moreover conviriCor| . as

are also the Governments of France and Great Britain, that the success of
the policy set forth above is linked with the development of international
trade*

In particular it attaches the greatest importance to action being

taken without delay to relax progressively the present system of quotas
and exchange controls with a view to their abolition.
5.

The Government of the United States, in common with the Govern­

ments of France and Great Britain, desires and invites theu^ooperrnrtion of
the other nations to realize the policy laid down.in the present declaration*
It trusts that no country will attempt to obtain an unreasonable competitive
exchange advantage and thereby hamper the effort to restore more stable
economic relations which it is the■aim-of.the-three:Governments— to^prrrmrto*-~~

——oOo—

~

2

-

In view of tiie fact that the quota on imports of **cattle weight­
ing 700 pounds or more each and not specially provided for” is nearing
fulfillment, telegrams have been sent to collectors of customs, notify­
ing them that effective September 28 importers will be required to
deposit duties at the full rate under the Tariff Act of 1930.

A

record is to be kept of the exact time at which each entry covering
this class of cattle was accepted.
Upon determination of the particular importations of this class
of cattle which come within the quota limitation, the Bureau of
Customs will authorize collectors to refund duties paid in excess of
the Trade Agreement rate.

###

Customs District

:
:
:
:

Cattle
Under 175
Pounds
(Head)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & Hew Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico
( a )

( a )

:
:
:
:

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)
147,040
94.4fo

27,754
3,562
21,904
231
77
562
-

:
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,502
22*5^

1
— 11
873

-

7,000
40,701
906
*,328
3,133
22
569
290
18,600
126,639

7,522
7,080
5,742
57

44
—

33
—
- —
—

500
2,388
652
4,502

— -

— —

—

20,401

The quota on this class of cattle has been filled •
istics and»,>Research. Bujpf^y^of Customs.)
¡®?

9'^

I n vie?,’ of

the

&

imports

of

feet

that

cattle weighing

specially provided

for"

the

ouote

700 p o u n d s

or m o r e

been

notifying

that effective Sent ember

importers will b e
rate under
.¿±aerto

the

covering

this
Upon

ations

of

class

to d e p o s i t
of 1 9 5 0 .

exact

class
the

refund

Trade Agreement

time

of c u s t o m s
28

duties

A record
at w h i c h

at. the full
is

each

entry

of c a t t l e v a s a c c e p t e d .

determination

this

to

to c o l l e c t o r s

required

of t he

quota limitation,
collectors

sent

xariff Act

be k e p t

e a c h and

is n e a r i n g f u l f i l l m e n t ,

telegrams have
them

on

rate.

of

of t h e

particular import­

cattle which

Bureau
duties

of
paid

come

v/ithin the

Customs w i l l
in e x c e s s

authorize

of the

Sta

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

September 26, 1936

TO MR* FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)

FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian
Trade Agreement, during the period from January 1 to September 19, 1936.
I will appreciate it if you will advise me as soon as this tabulation
hflfl been released, as we have requests for this information.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50 copies for­
warded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Saturday, September 26, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-54

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement
for the period January 1 to September 19, 1936, and the percentage that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs District

Dairy Cows
Cattle 700
Cattle
700 Pounds
Pounds
Under 175
Or More
Or More
Pounds
(Head)__________ (Head)_____________ (Head)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

(a )

147,040
94.4$

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada

7,000
40,701
906
1,328
3,133
22
569
290
18.600
126,639

FROM MEXICO
Ari zona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,522
7,080
5,742
57
20,401

27,754
3,562
21,904
231
77
562

4,502
22.5$
1
—

11
—

873
—

44

—

( a ) The quota on this class of cattle lias been filled.

—
—

33
—

—
500
2,388
652
.4,502

—
—
—
—
—

highly desirable.

For this purpose, the Belgian Govern­

ment will remain always willing and ready to bring its
entire collaboration.
For the Ambassador:

PRINCE lUGiari DE LIGIIE

market.
3)

The Preach Government, considering that the de­

sirable stability of the principal currencies cannot be
assured on a solid basis without a previous re-establish­
ment of a durable equilibrium between the various n a ­
tional economies, has decided to propose for this purpose
to its Parliament the adjustment of its currency.

The

Belgian Government, as well as the Governments of the
United States and Great Britain, considers that this
decision is of a nature to establish on more solid
foundations the stability of international relation­
ships.

It is ready to take part as often as it may be

necessary or useful in the consultations which may be
called, either between the interested Governments or
between the competent institutions.
4)

The Belgian Government, as well as the Govern­

ments of France, Great Britain and the United States,
is moreover convinced that the success of the policy
above outlined is bound up with the development of
international commerce.
Particularly, it attaches the greatest importance
to the initiation of an action without delay with a
view to reducing progressively the existing systems of
contingents and control of exchange with a view to
their final abolition.
5)

The Belgian Government, as well as the Govern­

ments of Prance, Gyeat Britain and the United States
9

considers that the collaboration of the other nations
for the realization of this program above mentioned is
highly

Mr. 3eoretsxy,

S,\. 4 .

Upon the order of my Government, I have the honor
to inform Your Excellency of the following;
1)

The Belgian Government has learned of the

declarations by which the Governments of France, Great
Britain and the United States have considered it op­
portune to express their intentions with regard to the
monetary and economic problems existing at the present
time, and Joins with them in affirming a common inten­
I

tion of safeguarding the peace, of favoring the es­
tablishment of conditions which will contribute to the
restoration of order through the international eco­
nomic relations and to pursue a policy with a view to
developing world prosperity and improving the standard
of living of all peoples.
3)

To this effect the Belgian Government is de­

cided to modify in no way the monetary policy which it
has carried out during the last year and a half and
which has had the effect of assuring the complete
stability of the Belgian franc on the international
exchange market, avoiding any disturbance of that
market.
His Excellency
The Secretary of State,
Department of State,
Washington, B. G.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Trashing ton
FOR IMMEDIATS RELEASE
Saturday, September 26, 1936.

Press Service
Nol 8-55

■. The Secretary of the Treasury naïves public the following note
from the Belgian Embassy, transnitted to the Treasury Department by
the Secretary of State;

"BELGIAN EMBASSY
H

Washington,
September 26, 1936.

r j A ry,

"Mr. Secretary,
"Upon the order of my Government, I have the honor to inform
Your Excellency of the following:
"l) The Belgian Government has learned of the declarations
by which the Governments of France, Great Britan and the United
States have considered it opportune to express their intentions
with regard to the monetary and economic problems existing at the
present time, and joins with them in affirming a common intention
of safeguarding the peace, of favoring the establishment of con­
ditions which will contribute to the restoration of order through
the international economic relations and to pursue a policy with
a view to developing world prosperity and improving the standard
of living of all peoples.
"2)
To this effect the Belgian Government is decided to modify
in no way the monetary policy which it has carried out during the
last year and a half and which has had the effect of assuring the
complete stability of the Belgian franc on the international exchange
market, avoiding any disturbance of that market.
"3)
The French Government, considering that the desirable sta­
bility of the principal currencies cannot be assured on a solid basis
without a previous re-establishment of a durable equilibrium between
the various national economies, has decided to propose for this purpose
to it's Parliament the adjustment of its currency.
The Belgian Government, as well as the Governments of the United States and Great Britain
considers that this decision is of a nature to establish on more solid
foundations the stability of international relationships. It is ready
to take part as often as it may be necessary or useful in the consul­
tations which may be called, either between the interested Governments
or between the competent institutions.

»

-

2

-

”4) The Belgian Government, as well asthe Governments of France,
Great Britain and the United States, is moreover convinced that the
success of the policy above outlined is bound up with the development
of international commerce..,

11 Particularly-, it attaches the greatest importance to the initi­
ation oi an action without delay with a view to reducing progressively
hue existing systems of contingents and control of exchange with a
view to their final abolition.
*’5) The Belgian Government, as well as the Governments of France,
u^eat 3ritain and the United States, considers that the collaboration
o± the other nations for the realization of this program above men­
tioned is highly desirable. For this purpose, the Belgian Government
will remain always willing and ready to bring its entire collaboration
"For the Ambassador:

(Signed)

His Excellency,
The Secretary of State,
Department of State,
Washington, D.G.

FRINGE EUGENE DE LIGNE"

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

msiiiefoi
FOR RELEASE, MOMIHG NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. September g | 1936,___
9/28/36

Press Service
s-

Secretary of the Treasury lorgenthau announced la s t
evening that the tenders for #50,000,000, or thereabouts,
o f 273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated September 30, 1936, and
maturing June 30, 1937, which were offered on Sept ember 25
were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on September 28.
The to ta l amount applied for was f 141,680,000, o f
which |50,121,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged

in p rice from 99.910, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.119
percent per annum, to 99.849, equivalent to a rate o f
about 0.199 percent per annua, on a bank discount b a sis.
Only part of the amount bid for a t the la t t e r price was
accepted.

The average price o f Treasury b i l l s to be

issued i s 99.859 and the average rate i s about 0.186 per­
cent per annum on a bank discount b a sis.

f" s /6
TREASURY B E P A R m S H f
Washington
MEMORANDUM FOR THE.PRESS

September 28, 193$

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AMD ASSAY OEEICSS:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933)
Week ending September 26, 1936:
Philadelphia...
San Francisco«^
Denver.........
Total for week ended September 26, 1936......
Total receipts through September 26, 1936....

fine ound
n .1! j
n
'll
it 11
»
M

SILVER TRAUSEERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive, proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended September 26, 1936;
Philadelphia , . . . . , , ...t .................. .
New York ................. ........... ........... ..
San Erancisco ....................................
Denver..... ,, ...... ....................... ........
New Orleans
,, ,.,.,.............. ........
Seattle............. .............................
Total for week ended September 26, 1936......*.,..
Total receipts through September 26, 1936.;.... .,.

148,00 fine ounc
86.00
« ,f

234,00
112,975,399.35

"
"

"
11

RECEIPTS OP GOLD 3Y THE MINTS AND ASSAY OEEICES:
New
Week ending September 26, 1936:
Imports_________ Secondary
Domestic.
P h i l adelphia..... ,......... ..... ...$
3,951,19 $ 79,683.62 $
1,803,72
Hew York..... .......... ........... .. 19,539,400.00
86,500.00
274,000.00
San Erancisco .......................
1,614,837,20
23,506.79 1,230,002.06
Denver. .... 25,229.13
17,042.47
721,819.26
Hew Orleans....... .............. -------- ----- - *
*■~ 14,158,39
213,55
Seattle.
..... ................... . .......... ~ ~
9,375.14
668.460,86
Total for week ending Sept,26, 1936..$21,183,417.52 $230,266.41 $2,896,299,45
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday» Sent ember 29« 1956,_____
9-28-36

Press Service
No. 8-56

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated
September 30, 1936, and maturing June 30, 1937, which were offered on
September 25, were opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on September 28.
The total amount applied for was $141,680,000, of which $50,121,000
was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.910, equivalent

to a rate of about 0.119 percent per annum, to 99.849, equivalent to a
rate of about 0.199 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
part of the amount bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only

The

average price of Treasury bills to be issued is 99.859 and the average
rate is about 0.186 percent per annum on a bank discount basis.
ooOoo

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

^—

S * 7 Sta

October 3, 1936

TO MR* FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. iRESMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes
under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trqde Agreement,during
the period from January 1 to September 26, 1936#
When the tabulation has been mimeographdd, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes, under
the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the
period January 1 to September 26, 1936, and the percentage that
such imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota
provisions, as follows:

<Sr

Customs Districts

: Cattle 700
: Pounds or
:
More
: (Head)

:
:
:
;

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
(Or More
(Head)

:
:

Cream
(Gal.)

:
:
:
:

White or
Irish Seed
Potatoes
(Pounds)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

150,645
96.7$

4,598
23.0$

FROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington

27,987
3,637
22,320
231
77
562
7,083
42,561
1,436
1,328
3,133
22
592
290
18,985

•
1

44
33
515
2,436
654

1
14,414
-

15,122,759
580
1,244,375
86,000

130,244

4,598

14,524

20,831,843

-

-

-

-

Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

-

11
904
-

14,524
0.9$

n
72
26
-

20,831,843
46.3$

»
52,500
92,650
180
2,307,915
1,780,374
144,510
-

7,522
7,080
5,742
57

-

-

-

•

-

20,401

-

-

-

NOTE - The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been filled.

(af

- Includes 1,534,697 pounds of seed potatoes imported during December,
1935, at regular rate of duty.

7

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Saturday, October 3, 1936,

Press Release
No<8~57

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
the imports of cattle, cream and seed potatoes, under the quota provisions
of tiie Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to September 26,
1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the totals allowable under
the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
PROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicage
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico
NOTE (a) -

Cattle 700
Pounds or
Mo^e
(Head)

150,645
96.7$
—

27,987
3,637
22,320
231
77
562
—

7,083
42,561
1,436
1,328
'3,133
22
592
290
-

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

4,598
23.0$
—

1
11
-

904
*.
44

11
-

20,831,843 (j
46.3$

52,500

72

92,650
180
26 2,307,915
_

~

-

1,780,374
144,510

-

33
-

1
-

-

515
2,436
-

654

130,244

4,598

20,401

14,524
0.9$

-

18,985

7,522
7,080
5,742
57

White: or
Cream Irish Seed
(Gal.) Potatoes
(Pounds)

-

15,122,759
-

**
580
14,414
- 1,244,375
86,000
14,524-20,831,843
_

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been filled,
Includes 1,534,697 pounds of seed potatoes imported during December,
1935, at regular rate of duty.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

October 5, 1936

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
amended
Week, ended October 2, 1936:
P h i l a d e l p h i a ..................... ,
San Francisco .................... .
Denver ................... ........ .
Total for week ended October 2, 1936,

980,694.62 fine
it
249,329.73
ti
7.470.41
n
237,494.76
n
875,605.03

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive.Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended October 2, 1936:
Philadelphia........ ............... ............ ..
New York ......................................... .
San Francisco....... | ........... ............ .. ...
Denver ......................................... . ..
New Orleans ................ ....... ............. .
Seattle..................................
Total for week ended October 2, 1936................
Total receipts through October 2, 1936 ........... .

639.45 fine ounces

639.45 fine ounces
112,976,038.80
"
f

RECEIPTS OF COLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
New
Week ended October 2, 1936:
Imports
Domestic
Secondary
P h i l a d e l p h i a .................. $$
357..03
13,,714.,79 $129, 257. 81 $
New Y o r k ............... .
151, 200,,00
57,221,,200«,00 112, 700. 00
San Francisco...............
36, 504. 10
740, 583,,68
297,,824.,96
Denver......................
37,,715.,25
694, 711.,56
16, 736. 59
- - - «
57,.51
New Orleans....... .........
22, 731. 23
*•*%***- - -, ~ ■
Seattle ....................
,
927.
611,.28
68
618.
___
Total for week ended October 2..$57,570,455.00 $327,857.41 $2,205,521.06

-9 -

Excluding from consideration 5 of the above banks for which receivers were
appointed to collect stock assessments, the depositors having been paid in full prio;
to receivership, there remain 38 receiverships terminated.
depositors were paid

100

per cent principal in

or a portion of the interest) 5 in
per cent; in

4

11

16

In these the unsecured

cases (and in some of these, all

cases the depositors were paid from

they were paid from 50 to 75 per cent; and in only

positors receive less than

50

7

75

to

100

cases did the de

per cent.

Dividend payments during September, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent nation
banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated $3 ,556,137 .
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the bank­
ing holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $739,4-98,353.

8

-

-

depositors received dividends amounting to 33.18 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Englewood, Kansas, in receivership January

4 , 1933*

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $84,204-, which represented 82.24 per cent of total liabilities.
positors received dividends amounting to

30

Unsecured de­

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Bishopville, South Carolina, in receivership January
18, 1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other credi­
tors aggregated $232,973, which represented 40.88 per cent of total liabilities.
secured depositors received dividends amounting to

25.975

UnJ

per cent of their claims.

The Citizens National Bank of Albert Lea, Minnesota, in receivership February
13, 1927, disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors!
aggregated $777,919> which represented 81.93 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecurej

depositors received dividends amounting to 78.49 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of LeSueur, Minnesota, in receivership February 15, 1933
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregate
$181,751, which represented 50.20 per cent of total liabilities.
received dividends amounting to

41*41

Unsecured depositor]

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Exira, Iowa, in receivership November 3, 1933; dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$161,448, which represented 97.66 per cent of total liabilities.
tors received dividends amounting to

96.48

Unsecured deposi­

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Mesa, Arizona, in receivership June 27, 1932; dis/
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$409,092, which represented 92.59 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposi­

tors received dividends amounting to 87.72 per cent of their claims.

-■7 -

1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors

aggregated $91,708, which represented 85.39 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse­

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 82.08 per cent of their claims.
The Walthill National Bank of Walthill, Nebraska, in receivership July 20, 1931
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated 167,523, which represented 74*46 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured de­

positors received dividends amounting to 6 4 .6 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Elba, Alabama, in receivership October 6 , 1931j dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$209,992, which represented 56.37 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposited

received dividends amounting to 1 2 .6 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Coin, Iowa, in receivership September 8 , 1931; dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$83,820, which represented 71.37 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositori

received dividends amounting to 63 .8 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Carlsbad, California, in receivership February 15,
1933; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors ag*
gregated $88,548, which represented 87.58 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured j

depositors received dividends amounting to 7 9 .7 5 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Thompson, Iowa, in receivership June 28, 1932; dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$170,193, which represented 81.15 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositoi

received dividends amounting to 70.95 per cent of their claims.
The First and Farmers National Bank in Luverne, Minnesota, in receivership Marc!
23, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, tp depositors and other creditor!
aggregated $577,213, which represented 64*20 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecur«

- 6 ~

received dividends amounting to 82,17 per cent of their claims.
The Whiteland National Bank of Whiteland, Indiana, in receivership October 3,
19335 depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.08 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $115,520, and the stockholders re­
ceived $ 2 ,249 , together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Versailles, Missouri, in receivership November 15,
1933 f the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment agains]

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during re­

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $8,516, which represented 18.30 pe:
cent of total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Bradford, Ohio, in receivership May 1, 1934-5 deposi-|
tors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in full
amounting to an additional dividend of 9*04- per cent.

Total payments to creditors,

including offsets allowed, aggregated $4-85,4-13, and the stockholders received $5,391)
together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The National Bank of Milton, Iowa, in receivership June 25* 1932; disbursements)
including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated $72,54-1*
represented 86.44- per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received divi-

dends amounting to 83.98 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Junction City, Arkansas, in receivership December 3>
1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors ag
gregated $280,803, which represented 94-*73 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors deceived dividends amounting to 95*14 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Millsboro, Pennsylvania, in receivership April 28,

- 5 -

uncollected were returned to the stockholders.
The City National Bank of Sumter, South Carolina, in receivership July 21,

193;

the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank,
The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the
stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receive

ship, including offsets allowed, aggregated $223,320, which represented 100 per ceni
of total liabilities.

The stockholders received $1,611, together with the assets re

maining uncollected.
The Security National Bank of Mobridge, South Dakota, in receivership September
11, 1931> disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditor
aggregated $14-3,117, which represented 75.05 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecuij

depositors received dividends amounting to 27.33 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Buffalo Center, Iowa, in receivership January 20, 19
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregat
$82,118, which represented 89*02 per cent of total liabilities.
received dividends amounting to

84..15

Unsecured depositor

per cent of their claims.

The State National Bank of Iowa Falls, Iowa, in receivership July 7, 1932; dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$333,366, which represented 78.93 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposito

received dividends amounting to 67.15 per cent of their claims.
The Farmers National Bank of New Bedford, Illinois, in receivership October 1>
1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
gregated $99,910, which represented 102.61 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 97.25 per cent of their claims.
The Kansas National Bank of Kansas, Illinois, in receivership December 17, 193^i
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregat
$228,170, which represented 85.89 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositoj

tors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $184,790, and the stockholders received
$3 ,044 , together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Snell National Bank of Winter Haven, Florida^ in receivership January 19 ,

19 3 3 , the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment agains

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during reJ

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $ 10 8 ,206 , which represented 79.30
per cent of total liabilities.
The Exchange National Bank of Spokane, Washington, in receivership January IB,

19 2 9 ; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 2.833 per cent.

Total payments to ci

itors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $ 8 ,983 ,623 , and the stockholders receh
$ 2 1 ,6 16 , together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Manistee, Michigan, in receivership December 12, 19;
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in fu]
amounting to an additional dividend of 1Q.53S per cent.

Total payments to creditor

including offsets allowed, aggregated $ 680 ,362 , and the stockholders received $84-9,
together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Maquon, Illinois, in receivership August 14, 1929}
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal and a portion of the
interest, amounting to an additional dividend of I .48 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $ 1 6 1 ,6 6 7 .
The Harveysburg National Bank of Harveysburg, Ohio, in receivership October 23,

19 3 3 } depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.206 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $78,804, and the assets remaining

- 3 -

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors ag­
gregated $86,987, which represented 70.88 per cent of total liabilities.
depositors received dividends amounting to

41*2

Unsecured

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank in Brockway, Pennsylvania, in receivership February 11
1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment againa

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during re­

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $703,016, which represented 100.69
per cent of total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Ralls, Texas, in receivership January 6, 1931; dis­
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$84,652, which represented 91.62 of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors receive

dividends amounting to 88.1 per cent of their claims.
The Dawson City National Bank of Dawson, Georgia, in receivership November 14,
1932; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 18.17 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $498,548, and the stockholders re­
ceived $4,750, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The South Ashland National Bank of Chicago, Illinois, in receivership June 27,
1932; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 5.309 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $116,495, and the stockholders re­
ceived $2,597, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Farnhamville, Iowa, in receivership July 28, 1933J
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 7.95 per cent.

Total payments to credi-|

-

2

-

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 8 per cent.

Total payments to creditors

including offsets allowed, aggregated $125,197, and the stockholders received $7,401
together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank in Webster Groves, Missouri, in receivership March 1,
1934-5 depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.662 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $289,267, and the stockholders re­
ceived $7,267, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Roodhouse, Illinois, in receivership February 1, 191
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
amounting to an additional dividend of 6 per cent.

fu l

Total payments to creditors, id

eluding offsets allowed, aggregated $281,243, and the stockholders received $610, td
gether with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Fayetteville, Tennessee, in receivership April 9,
19345 depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest
in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.443 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $374*372, and the stockholders re­
ceived $7,433, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank ^of Brockway, Pennsylvania, in receivership February H
1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment againj

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during re-j

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $28,416, which represented 27.62
per cent of total liabilities.
The National Bank of Snow Hill, North Carolina, in receivership January 11* *9

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

txA it

Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
-T riu eS D A

Press Service

£ (Pc TO G i f t f, /f3 £ #

£-52

J. F. T. 0* Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today announced the comple­
tion of the liquidation of

43

receiverships during September, 1936, making a total

of 4-84 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the so-called
banking holiday of March, 1933.

Total disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors of these

484

institutions, exclusive of the

42

receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated #141,762,837, or an average return
of 76.31 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors received divi­
dends amounting to an average of

62.08

per cent of their claims.

The National Bank of Hudson, Wisconsin, in receivership March 1, 19345 de­
positors and other creditors were paid

100

per cent principal with interest in

full amounting to an additional dividend of 9*068 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated #447,356, and the stockholders
received # 16 ,220, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Peoples National Bank of Burgettstown, Pennsylvania, in receivership
January 11, 1932$ depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent princi­
pal with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of

9.53

per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated #169,922, and
the stockholders received #3,950, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Mayville, Wisconsin, in receivership March 23>

1934?

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 9*6 per cent.

Total payments to credi­

tors, including offsets allowed, aggregated #422,351, and the stockholders received
# 8,584, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Summerfield, Ohio, in receivership December

21, 1933

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING- THE MONTH OF
________
SEPTEMBER 1986
Continued:
■*
Date of
Failure:
Kansas National Bank , Kansas, 111
Whiteland National Bank, Whiteland, Indiana *
First National Bank, Versailles, Mo*
1/
First National Bank, Bradford, Ohio *
The First National Bank of Milton, Iova
First National Bank, Junction City, Ark*

12-17-30
10-3-33
11-15-33
5-1-34
6*23-32
12*3-30

First National Bank, Millsboro, Pa*
Walthill¿National Bank, Walthill, Nebr.
First National Bank, Elba, Alabama
First National Bank, Coin, Iona
First National Bank, Carlsbad, Calif*
First National Bank, Thompson, Iowa

Total
Disbursements
Including
Offsets Allowed:

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Uhsecured
Claimants:

228,i70 *00
115,520.00
8,516*00
485,413*00
72,541*00
280,803*00

85*89
106*01
18*30
104*27
86*44
94*73

82*17
108*08
18*0654
109*04
83*98
95*14

4-28-31
7-20-31
10-6-31
9-8-31
2—15-33
6-28-32

91,708*00
67,523*00
209,992*00
83,820*00
88,548*00
170,193*00

85*39
74*46
56*37
71*37
87*58
81*15

82*08
64*6
63*8
79*75
70*95

First & Farmers Nat|l Bank In Lavarne, Minn*
First National Bank# Englewood, Kansas
First National Bank# Bishopville, S. C.
Citizens Natfl Bank, Albert Lea, Minn*
First National Bank, Le Sueur} Minn*
First National Bank# Exira, Iowa

3-23-31
1-4-33
1-18-30
2-18-27
2—15—33
11-3-33
f

577,213*00
84,204*00
232,973*00
777,919*00
181,751*00
161*448*00

64*20
82*24
40*88
81*98
50*20
97*66

38*18
30*
25*975
78*49
. 41.41
96*48

First National Bank, Mesa, Arizona

6—27*32

409,092*00

92*59

87*72

*

$

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

12*6

Formerly in Conservatorship#

1/ Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment covering deficiency in value of assets sold, or
to complete unfinished liquidation*

/ r

f f i

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
__________________ SEPTEMBER 1956

Per Cent
Total
Retums
to All
Creditore:

Per Oant
Dividends
a .Paid
unsecured
Claimants:

Date of
Failure:

Total
Disbursements
Including
Offsets Allowed:

The National Bank of Hudson, Hudson, Vise* ♦
Peoples National Bank of Burgettstoun, Pa*
First National Bank, Mayville, Wise, *
First National Bank, Summerfield, Ohio *
First National Bank IN Webster Groves, Mo« *
First National Bank, Roodhouse, 111»

3*1«84
1-11-32
3-23-34
12-21-33
3-1-34
2-1-33

$ 447,356*00
169,922.00
422,351.00
125,197.00
289,267.00
281,243*00

106*51
106*51
107*27
106*42
104.62
104.70

109.068
109.53
109*6
108*
109*6628
106*

First National Bank, Fayetteville, Tenn« *
First National Bank of, Brocksay, Pa« 1/
The National Bank of Snow Hill, Snow Hill,N.C.
First National Bank IN Brocksay, Pa« 1/
First National Bank, Ralls, Texas
Dawson City National Bank, Dawson, Ga«

4—9*34
2-11-32
1-11-32
2-11-32
1-6-31
11-14-32

374,372.00
28,416«00
86,987*00
703,016*00
84,652*00
498,548*00

104«68
27.62
70.88
100*69
91«62
103*88

108*443
27.6274
41*2
9*5975
88*1
118.17

South Ashland National Bank, Chicago, 111«
First National Bank, Farnhamville, Iowa ♦
Snell National Bank, Winter Haven, Fla« 1/
Exchange National Bank, Spokane, Wash«
First National Bank, Manistee, Mich« *
First National Bank, Maquon, 111

6-27-32
7—28—33
1-19-33
1-18-29
12-12-33
8—14—29

116,495*00
184,790*00
108,206*00
8,988,625*00
680,362*00
161,667.00

100.83
104.73
79*30
101.67
103*92
101*31

105*309
107.95
79.30381
102.833
110*538
101*48

Barveysburg National Bank, Harveysburg, Ohio * 10-25-33
7-21-32
City National Bank, Sumter, S* C* 1/
9-11-31
Security National Bank, Mobridge, s« D«
1-20-33
First National Bank, Buffalo Center, Iowa
7-7-32
State National Bank, Iowa Falls, Iowa
10-1-31
Farmers National Bank, New Bedford, 111«

78,804*00
223,320*00
143,117*00
82,118*00
333,366*00
99,910*00

104.51
100.
75*05
89.02
78*93
102*61

108.206
49*64715
27*38
84.15
67.15
97*25

-

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,Thursday, October 8, 1936.
10-5—36«

Press Service
Ho. 8-58
t

J..E.T. O ’Connor, Comptroller pf the Currency,

}

today announced the completion

of the liquidation of 43 receiverships during September, 1936, making a total of
484 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the so-called
tanking holiday of March, 1933.

Total disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors of these 484 institutions, exclusive of the 42
receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated $141,762,837, or an average return
of 76.31 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors received divi­
dends amounting to an average of 62.08 per cent of their claims.
The National Bank of Hudson, Wisconsin, in receivership March 1, 1934; de­
positors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.068 per cent. Total payments to
creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $447,356, and the stockholders
received $16,220, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Peoples National Bank of Burgettstown, Pennsylvania, in receivership
January 11, 1932; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal
with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.53 per cent.
■ %'
',
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $169,922, and.
the stockholders received $3,950, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Mayville, Wisconsin, in receivership March 23,
1934; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent-principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.6 per cent.

Total pay­

ments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $422,351, and the
stockholders received $8,584, together with the assets remaining uncollected.

The First National Bank of Summerfield, Ohio, in receivership December 21,
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8 per cent.

Total pay­

ments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $125,197, and the
stockholders received $7,407, together with the assets remaining uncollected#
The First National Bank in Webster Groves, Missouri, in receivership
March 1, 1934; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal
with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.662 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $289,2’67,
and the stockholders received $7,267, together with the assets remaining un­
collected.
The First National Bank of Roodhouse, Illinois, in receivership February 1,
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 6 per cent#

Total pay­

ments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $281,243, and the
stockholders received $610, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National B ank of F-^yetteville, Tennessee, in receivership
April 9, 1934; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal
with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.443 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $374,372,
and the stockholders received $7,453, together with the assets remaining un-*
collected.
The First National B ank of Brockway, Pennsylvania, in receivership
February 11, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been
assumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of col­

lecting an assessment against the stockholders to
assets sold.

cover a deficiency in the

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed,

segregated $28,416, which represented 27.62 per cent of total liabilities.

-3-

The National Bank of Snow Hill, North Carolina, in receivership January 11,
1932j dishursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and ether creditor
aggregated $86,987, which represented 70.88 per cent of total liabilities.

Un­

secured depositors received dividends amounting to 41.2 per cent of their claims
The First National Bank in Brockway, Pennsylvania, in receivership February
11, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by
another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an

assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.
Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated
$703,016, which represented 100,69 per cent of total liabilities.
The First National B ank of Ralls, Texas, in receivership January 6, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $84,652, which represented 91.62 of total liabilities*

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 88.1 per cent of their claims.
The Dawson City National Bank of Dawson, Georgia, in receivership November
14, 1932; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 18.17 per cent.

Total

payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $498,548, and the
stockholders received $4,750, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The South Ashland National B ank of Chicago, Illinois, in receivership
June 27, 1932; depositors and other creditors were paid 10Q per cent principal
with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 5.309 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $116,495, and
the stockholders received $2,597, together with the assets remaihing uncollected.
The First National B ank of Farnhamville, Iowa, in receivership July 28,
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 7.95 per cent.

Total

payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $184,790, and the

-4~

stockholders received $3,044, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Snell National B ank of Winter Haven, Florida, in receivership January
19, 1933, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by
another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an

assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.
Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated
$108,206, which represented 79.30 per cent of total liabilities.
The Exchange National Bank of Spokane, Washington, in receivership January
18, 1929; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 2.833 per cent.

Total

payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $8,983,623, and
the stockholders received $21,616, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National

Bank of Manistee, Michigan, in receivership December 12,

1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 10.538 per cent.

Total

payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $680,362, and.the
stockholders received $849, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National B ank of Maquon, Illinois, in receivership August 14,

1929; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal and a
portion of the interest, amounting to an additional dividend of 1.48 per cent.
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $161,667.
The Harveysburg National B ank of Harveysburg, Ohio, in receivership
October 25, 1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal
with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.206 per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $78,804, and
the assets remaining uncollected were returned to the stockholders.

>-5-

The City National Bank of Sumter, South Carolina, in receivership July 21,
1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by
another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an

assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.
Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated
$223,320, which represented 100 per cent of total liabilities.

The stockholders

received $1,611, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Security National B^nk of Mobridge, South Dakota, in receivership
September 11, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $143,117, which represented 75.05 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 27.38 per

cent of their claims.
The

First National Bank of Buffalo Center, Iowa, in receivership January 20,

1933, disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors

aggregated $82,118, which represented 89.02 per cent of total liabilities.

Un­

secured depositors received dividends amounting to 84.15 per cent of their claims.
The State National B^nk of Iowa Falls, Iowa, in receivership July 7, 1932;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $333,366, which represented 78.93 per cent of total liabilities.

Un­

secured depositors received dividends amounting to 67.15 per cent of their claims.
The Farmers National B^nk of New Bedford, Illinois, in receivership
October 1, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $99,910, which represented 102.61 per cent,of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 97.25 per

cent of their claims.
The Kansas National Bank of Kansas, Illinois, in receivership December 17,,
1930, disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $228,170, which represented 85*89 per cent of total

re­
liabilities.

Unsecured, depositors received dividends amounting to 82.17 per cent

of their claims.
The Whiteland National Bank of Whiteland, Indiana, in receivership October 3
1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with
interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.08 per cent.

Total

payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $115,520, and the
stockholders received $2,249, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Versailles, Missouri, in receivership November
15, 1933, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by
another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an

assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.
Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $8,516,
which represented 18.30 per cent of total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Bradford, Ohio, in receivership May 1, 1934;
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 9.04 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $485,413, and the stockholder^
received $5,391, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The National Bank of Milton, Iowa, in receivership June 25, 1932; disburse­
ments, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$72,541, which represented 86.44 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 83.98 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Junction City, Arkansas, in receivership December
3, 1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other credit
ors aggregated $280,803, which represented 94.73 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 95.14 per cent of their
claims

-7The First National Bank of Mill ¿boro i Penn sylvan ik* in receivership Ajbril
28, 1931} disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $91,708, which represented 85.39 per cent.of total liabili­
ties.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 82.08 per cent of

their claims.
The WalU'.iil National Bark of Walthill, Nebraska, in receivership July 20,
1931; disbursements,

including offsets allowed, to depositors and other credit­

ors aggregated $67,523, which represented 74.46 per cent of total liabilities*
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 64.6 per cent of their
claims.
The First National Bank of Elba, Alabama, in receivership October 6, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors

aggregated $209,992, which represented 56.37 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 12.6 per cent of their
claims.
The First National Bank of Coin, Iowa, in receivership September 8, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $83,820, which represented 71:«37 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 63.8 per cent of their
claims.
The First National Bank of Carlsbad, California, in receivership February
15, 1933; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other
creditors aggregated $88,548, which represented 87.58 per cent of total liabili­
ties,

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 79,75 per cent of

their claims.
The First National Bank of Thompson, Iowa, in receivership June 28, 1932;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $170,193, which represented 81.15 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 70.95 per cent of their
claims#
The First and Farmers National Bank in Luverne, Minnesota, in receivership
March 23, 1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $577,213, which represented 64.20 per cent.of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 38.18 per cent

of their claims.
The First National Bank of Englewood, Kansas, in receivership January 4, 1933
disbursements,- including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors

aggregated $84,204, which represented 82.24 per cent of total liabilities#
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 30 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Bishopville, South Carolina, in receivership
January 18, 1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $232,973, which represented 40.88 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 25.975

per cent of their claims.
The Citizens National Bank of Albert Lea, Minnesota, in receivership
February 18, 1927; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and
other creditors aggregated $777,919, which represented 81.98 per cent.of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 78.49 per

cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of LeSueur, Minnesota, in receivership February
15, 1933; disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $181,751, which represented 50.20 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 41*41 per

cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Exira, Iowa, in receivership November 3, 1933;
I
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors

aggregated $161-,448, which represented 97.66 per cent of total liabilities*
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to .96*48 per cent of their
claims*

The First

National Bank of Mesa, Arizona, in receivership June 27, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $409,092, which represented 92.59 per cent of total liabilities*
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 87.72 per cent of their
claims.
Excluding from consideration 5 of the above banks ‘for which receivers were
appointed to collect stock assessments, the depositors having been paid in full
prior to receivership, there remain 38 receiverships terminated.

In these the

unsecured depositors were paid 100 per cent principal in 16 cases (and in some of
these, all 6r a portion of the interest); in 11 cases the depositors were paid
from 75 to 100 per cent; in 4 they were paid from 50 to 75 per cent; and in only
7 cases did the depositors receive less than 50 per cent.
Dividend payments during September, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent
national banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated
$3,556,137.
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the
banking holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $739,498,353.

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
___________________ .SEPTEMBER 1936______________________

Date of
Failure:
The National Bank of Hudson, Hudson, Wise. *
Peoples National Bank of Burgettstown, Pa.
First National Bank, Mayville, Wise. *
First National Bank, Summerfield, Ohio *
First National Bank IN Wehster Groves, Mo. *
First National Bank, Roodhouse, 111.

3- 1-34
I-II-32
3- 23-34
12- 21-33
3- 1 - 3U
2-1-33

Total
Disbursements
Including
Offsets Allowed:
$

W+ 7 ,356.00
169,922.00
1+22,351.00
125,197.00
2S9 ,267.00
281,2^3.00

First National Bank, Fayetteville, Tenn. *
U-9- 3U
First National Bank of, Brockway, Pa. 1/
2- 11-32
The National Bank of Snow Hill, Show Eill,N.C. 1 - 11-32
First National Bank IN Brockway, Pa. 1/
2- 11-32
First National Bank, Ralls, Texas
1 - 6-31
Dawson City National Bank, Dawson, Ga.
ll-lU-32

37^.372.00
28,Ulo.OO
86.987.00
703,016.00
8U, 652.00
U 93.5US.OO

6- 27-32
7-28-33
1 - 19-33
l-lS-29
12- 12-33
8- 1 U-29

116 .U95.00
13U,790.00
108,206.00
8,983,623.00
680,362.00
16 1 ,667.00

Harveyshurg National Bank, Harveysburg, Ohio * 10-25-33
City National Bank, Sumter, S. C. 1/
7- 21-32
Security National B ank, Mohridge, S. D.
9- 11-3 1
First National Bank, Buffalo Center, Iowa
1 - 20-33
State National Bank, Iowa Falls, Iowa
7-7-32
Fanners National Bank, New Bedford, 111.
10- 1-31

73-,SOU.OO
223,320.00
1^3,117.00
82,118.00
333,366.00
99,910.00

South Ashland National Bank, Chicago, 111.
First National Bank, Farnhamville, Iowa *
Snell National Bank, Winter Haven, Fla. 1/
Exchange National Bank, Spokane, Wash.
First National Bank, Manistee, Mich*
First National Bank, Maquon, 111.

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:
106.51
106.51
107.27

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

100.068
109.53

109.6

106.^2
IOU .62
10U .70

108.
109.6628
106 .

10U.6S
27.62

108 .UU 3
27.6274

70.88
100.69
91.62
103.88
100.83

iou .73

79.30
101.67
103.92

10 1.3 1
10^.51
100 .
75.05
89.02
73.93

102.61

Ul.2
9.5975
SS.l
118.17
105.309
107.95
79.30331
102.833

110.533
10 1 .Us
103.206
49.6H 715
27.33
SU .15
67.15
97.25

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
____________________ SEPTEMBER 1936 ________

Continued:

Date of
Failure:

Total
Disbursements
Including
Offsets Allowed:

228 ,I7 O.OO
115,520.00
3,516.00
435,413.00
72,5^1.00
230,803.00

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

P A v Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

85 „89
106.01
1 8 .30

82.17
108.08
18.0654
109.04
83.98
95.14

Kansas National Bank, Kansas, 111.
Whitelana National Bank, Whiteland, Indiana *
First National Bank, Versailles, Mo.
if
First National Bank, Bradford, Ohio *
The First National Bank of Milton, Iowa
First National Bank, Junction City, Ark.

12-17-30
10-3 -3 3
11-15-33
5- 1 -3 U
6-25-32
12-3-30

First National Bank, Millshoro, Pa.
Walthill,National Bank, Walthill, Nehr.
First National Bank, Elba, Alabama
First National Bank, Coin, Iowa
First National Bank, Carlsbad, Calif.
First National Bank, Thompson, Iowa

4-28-31
7-20-31
10- 6-31
9-S-31
2-15-33
6- 28-32

91,708.00
6 7 ,523.00
209 ,992.00
83,320.00
88,548.00
170,193.00

First & Farmers Nat’l Bank IN Luverne, Minn.
First National Bank, Englewood, Kansas
First National Bank, Pishopville, S. C.
Citizens Nat’l Bank, Arbert Lea, Minn.
First National Bank, Le Sueur, Minn.
First National Bank, Sxira, Iowa

3-23-31
i-U-33
1- 18-30
2- 13-27
2-15-33
11 - 3-.33

577,213.00
84,204.00
232,973.00
777,919.00
18 1 ,75 1.0 0
161 ,448.00

81.9 8
50.20
9 7.6 6

30.
25.975
73. ^9
4l.4l
96.48

First National Bank, Mesa, Arizona

6- 27-32

409,092.00

92.59

87.72

*

$

104.27
8o.44
9*+.73
85*39

7 ^.U6
56.37
71.37
87.58
81.15
64.20
32.24
40.88

82.08
64.6

12 .6
6 3 .s
79.75
70.95

3 8 .1 8

Formerly in Conservatorship.

ly Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment covering deficiency in value of assets so
to complete -unfinished liquidation.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
FOR RELEASE. HORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. October 6 . 1936._______
10/5/36

Press Service
c 3 7

Secretary o f the Treasury Morgenthau announced la s t evening
that the tenders fo r 150,000,000, or thereabout s 9 o f 273—day
Treasury h ills * dated October 7, 1936* and maturing July 7, 1937,
which were offered on October 2 , were opened at the Federal Reserre banks on October 5.
The to ta l amount applied fo r m s $175,240*000, o f which
Ì5O9O459OO0 was accepted.

Except fo r one bid o f f§,0QO, the

accepted bids ranged in p rice from 99.886, equivalent to a
rate o f about 0*150 percent per annum, to 99.873, equivalent
to a rate o f about 0*167 percent per annum, on a bank discount
basis*

Only part o f the amount bid for at the l a t t e r price was

accepted*

The average p rice o f Treasury b i l l s to be issued is

99*877 and the average rate i s about 0.162 percent per annua on
a bank discount basis*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
JOE RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. October 6, 1936,________

Press Service
N o • 8~59

10- 5- 3 6 .
Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the tenders
for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated October 7, 1936,
and maturing July 7, 1937, which were offered on October 2, were opened at the
federal Reserve Banks on October 5*

^

The total amount applied for was $175,240,000, of which $50,045,000 was

t
accepted.

Except for one bid of $5,000, the accepted bids ranged in price from

99.886, equivalent to a rate of about 0.150 percent per annum, to 99,873,
equivalent to a rate of about 0,167 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
Only part of the amount bid for at the latter price was accepted.

The average

price of Treasury bills to be issued is 99.877 and the average rate is about 0.162
percent per annum on a bank discount basis.
ooOoo

¿

à

CANADIAN "
During, the Pogioà'^Jginigry^^"^'
1■^p^emliqi11S6|'""1L936 .
(PXftl 1,m1napy Figugeo,)

Customs Districts
TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N. H.
Massachusetts •
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
San Francisco
Vermont
Washington

( P i ,Mjiiü¡]||iiii.i try

:

Douglas
Fir
(Bd. Ft.)

—
Sawed Timber and Lumber
: Western
: Mixed Fir : Total Fir
: Hemlock
: & ^ m l o c k : & Hemlock
: (Bd. Ft.) :
(Bd. Ft.): (Bd. Ft.)

60,524)289

24,582,689

288,528
8,090,707
4,941,586
11,284,478
48,758
11,889,085
65,228
5,022,328
11,010,176
19,597
274,995
656
399,201
7,188,966

98,049
-

2,470,880
457,440
95,064
5,072
16,285,636
—

1,573,972
3,308,004
•
«
•

89,225
199,347

22,382,132

2,958,707
•
—

«as
m
mm

19,423,425
«ft
mm

—
m
m
m

nf1 ni1u h HT1' it1111h i‘Mrrw''HPwi|i"f^r>."a.:rrrijm5 )

107,489,110
43.01

386,577
2,958,707
10,561,587
5,399,026
11,379,542
53,830
28,174,721
65,228
26,019,725
14,318,180
19,597
274,995
656

468,426
7,388,313

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures
for the imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock, under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from
January 1 to September 26, 1936, and the percentage

that such imports

bear to the total allowable under the quota, as follows:

~ ...- -...... .....

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

A
Sta

October 6, 1936,

TO MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289,

‘
Treasury Department)

FROM MR. FREEMAN l
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures on imports of Douglas fir and Western hemlock,
under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during
the period from January 1 to September 26, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, kindly have 40
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

p rpqq c;p r v io p

Tuesday, October 6, 1936.

No. 8-SO

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
the imports of Douglas fir and ..estern hemlock, under the Quota provisions
of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period from January 1 to September
26, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the total allowable
under the quota, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth
Los Angeles
Maine & N.H.
Massachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
San Diego
San Francisco
Vermont
Washi ngton

Sawed Timber and Lumber____________
W estern : Mixed Fir :Total Fir
:
Hemlock : & Hemlock :& Hemlock
:
(Bd. Ft.) : (Bd. Ft.)
:(Bd. Ftj L — 1

Douglas
Fir

60,524,289
____________

24,582,689
22,382,132
107,489,110
__________________ ____________
43.0#

288,528

98,049
2,958,707

8,090,707
4,941,586
11,284,478
48,758
11,889,085
65,228
5,022,328
11,010,176
19,597
274,995
656
399,201
7,188,966

2,470,880
457,440
95,064
5,072
16,285,686
1,573,972
3,308,004

— oOO'

89,225
199,347

19,423r425

386,577
2,958,707
10,561,587
5,399,026
11,379,542
53,830
28,174,721
65,228
26,019,725
14,318,180
19,597
274,995
656
488,426
7,388,313

J

IMPORTS ΠK D COMMODITIES FROM YHE PHILIPPINES TMDER QUOT|r 1
PROVISIONS ^ / P H I L K P I N E I N D E P ^ f c c E ACT A N D / J O R D ^ A C Ç . Æ 19^5

/

DurJ^^g the Period Januëry I| to Septpinber 26, 1936
(Preliaiinary ÿigurej

i

Customs Districts
i

TOT5ÄL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St* Lawrence
St* Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wi soonsin

i

Coconut Oil :
(Pounds)
:
244,379 »261
54.5#
•
—
16,492,673
3,250,500
24,942,830
m

41,115,260
121,422,901
7,938,812

S u g a r s
Refined
s Unrefined
(Pounds)
: (Pounds)
98,530 ,368
88.0#
-

5,000
•»
19,376,012
-

499,329
*
3,744,293
25,679,060
•

•
7,135,357
•
42,093,317
-

Quota year commenced May !•
[Pr<

id by Divij

1,640,650,670
91.6#

2,753,250
45.9JÎ

11,922,506
9,016,528
9,117
81,623,296
11,285,449

232,295
28,381

m

296,515,680
476,084,748

-

—

•
29,212,530
•
5,750
-

:
: Cordage*
: (Pounds)

fr^ ™ gtgfrtgffir8*aïï^

78,836
623,666,375
—

w
w

130,618,459
29,676
-

•

66,789
261,483
4,530
30,496
6,251
25,776
999,207
2,048
45,633
11,371
97,110
13,615
1,837
128,876
546,186
17,679
145,690
87,997

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for imports of commodities coming into the United
States from the Philippine Islands, under the quota provisions
of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935,
for the period January 1 to September 26, 1936, and the percentage
that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the quotas,
as follows:

<^(o

O FFIC E OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

October 7, 1936
MR. FUSSELL
Roam 289 » Treasury Department)

FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for imports of commodities coming into the
United States from the Philippine! Islands, under the quota provisions of
the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935, for the
period January 1 to September 26, 1936.
When this tabulation has been mimeographed, will you kindly
have 15 copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Bldg.?

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,

Press Service
No. 8-61

Thursday, October 8, 1936.
The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for imports of
commodities coming into the United States from the Philippine Islands, under the
quota provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935,
for the period January 1 to September 26, 1936, and the percentages that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quotas, as follows:

Customs Districts

, _

~. -

- - - . - «, 16,492,678
3, 250, 500
24, 942, 830
- - -. - - , «
41, 115, 260
121, 422, 901

1,640,650,670
91.6$

11,,922,,506
,016,,528
9,,117
- m — - «

-

-

- , î»

M

«.

«

-. «

-

.-

-

►
- •*

19, 376,,012

81,,623,,296
11.,285,,449
- - - - ~ - «
296,►315,,680
476,,084,,748

25, 679,,060

78,,836
623,, 666,,375

-

-

—
-

- ■-

-

. * +*
~

3, 760

42, 093,,317

Quota year commenced May 1

-

-

-

-

«

-

-

-

—

29,,676
** - - «

~

-

7* 133 j,357

w

«

499,,329
- - - - - ~■ - ~ 3, 744,,293

«

29, 212, 530

-

-

o

-

v, 938, 812
- - - « •-

:
: Cordage*
: (Pounds)

98,530,368
88.0$

5,
—

S u g a r s
Unrefined
.
*
(Pounds)
:

00
H
to

*

Refined
(Pounds)

CO
1—l

CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maine
Maryland
Mass achus e 11 s
Michigan \
New Orleans
New Yorü’
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
■■Wisconsin______

244,379,261
54,5$

:
i
:

o
o
o

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

•
•
îCoconut Oil
ï (Pounds)

— —

«

,459

2,753,250
45.9$

232,295
28,381

-

66,789
261,483
4,530
- « «
30,496
6,251
25,776
999,207
2,048
45,633
11,371
97,110
13,615
1,837
128,876
546,186
17,679
145,690
87,997

After mature consideration, decision has been reached
to destroy the stock of unused and obsolete tax-exempt Potato
¥
4
Ta.
42xAt4r^-m> ¿Vex Sr—/
Stamps^
Suamp collectors and philatelic organizations '
made representations that the stamps had no philatelic value,
em i
v

terms.

The stamps had no face value as expressed in monetary

/

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Washington

POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday, October 8, 1036.

Press Service
No. 8-62

After mature consideration, decision has been reached to destroy the
stock of unused and obsolete tax-exempt Pota,to Stamps, previously referred
to in Press 'Service No, 8-1, August 1* 1936,

Stamp collectors and philatelic

organizations made representations that the stamps had no philatelic value.
The stamps had no face value as expressed in monetary terms.
ooOoo

Under

arrangments perfected

Treasury

of the P h i l i p p i n e

services

f o r the U n i t e d S t a t e s

redeeming

pe:

Adjusted

Islands

will

today

the

p e r f o r m fiscal-agency

T r e a s u r y ^ in receiving

Service bonds.

Previously

it h a s

and
b e e n necc

TO

-

2-

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

« fed

Washington

OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
hursday, October 8, 1936*

Press Service
fNn» 8-63

Under arrangements perfected today, the Treasury of the Philippine
Islands will perform fiscal-agency services for the United States Treasury
in receiving and redeeming Adjusted Service Bonds.

Previously it has been

necessary for residents of the Philippine Islands, who hold such bonds, to
transmit them to the United States for redemption.
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPMSMT
1ASHIIST01

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday. October 10. 1936.
10/9/36

Press Serrice
£ ,/ u

*

Y

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced
la s t evening that the tenders for $50,000,000, or there­
abouts, of 2?3-day Treasury b i l l s , dated October 14, 1936,
and maturing July 14, 1937, which were offered on October

7,

were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on October 9«
The to ta l amount applied fo r was $192,136,000,
o f which $50,133,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged

in p rice from 99.900, equivalent to a rate o f about 0.132
percent per annum, to 99.891, equivalent to a rate o f about
0.144 percent per annum, on a bank discount b a s is .

Only

part o f the amount bid for at the la t t e r price was accepted.
The average price o f Treasury b i l l s to be issued i s 99.893
and the average rate i s about 0.141 percent per annum on a
bank discount b a sis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

EOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday» October 10, 1936«_____ _
10-9-36.

Press Service
No. 8-64

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the ten­
ders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated October
14, 1936, and maturing July 14, 1937, which were offered on October 7, were
opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on October 9.
The total amount applied for was $192,136,000, of which $50,133,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.900, equivalent to a rate

of'about 0.132 percent per annum, to 99.891, equivalent to a :rate of about
0.144 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount

The average price.of Treasury

bills to be issued is 99.893 and the average rate is about 0.141 percent
per annum on a bank discount basis.
ooOoo

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

OCT lit 1936

TO 1®. GASTON
FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS:

(Through Assistant Secretary Gibbons)

There is transmitted herewith a statement showing im­
ports of distilled liquors and wines, and duties collected
thereon, covering the month of August, 1935, 1936, and the
eight months» period ended August 31, 1935 and 1936,

Inclosure«

DISTILLED LIQUORS (P r o o f G allon »};
S tock In Custom« Bonded Ware»
h ou ses a t b eg in n in g
f e t a l Im port« (F r e e and D u tia b le )
A v a ila b le f o r Consumption
E ntered i n t o Consumption ( a )

Exported ¿gp«ia„„ftugti
!
MM
S to ck in Customs Bended Warehouses
a t end
STILL WINES (L iq u id G a llo n s)*
Stock in Customs Bonded Ware»
h ou ses a t b eg in n in g
T o ta l Im ports (F r e e and D u tia b le )
A v a ila b le fo r Consumption
E ntered In to Consumption ( a )

3*757# 20*
1 ,0 2 2 ,0 4 5

4*773*254

3*701,876
1 * 0 4 2,545
4 ,7 4 4 ,4 2 1

1*351*041

3 8 1 ,535

S tock in Customs Bonded Ware«
hou ses a t e nd
DUTIES COLLECTED ON
D i s t i l l e d L iquors
S t i l l Wines
S p a rk lin g Wines
T o ta l D u tie s C o lle c te d on L iquors

4*282,<)6o
3**30,815

7*313*775

4,167,500

3*757*209

3*501,472

3*397*524

3#501,472

1**37*508
1*541,945
121,859
13**279
129**34
1**95*279
1*759*3*7
1**71*579
1 * 4 ,2 1 4
197*955
1 3 2 ,1 2 9
|(||)1ntrwt•mmmsim '«2j^|jl»L«?l|ir'lrif—'*IKNMIWIWR—

1 ** 07,096
1 * 423,232

1*7**, 588
1 * 1 *1,115
2, 927,703

1*559*000

201,436
1 * ,5 8 1

218,017

x , 553,000

21**919
15*095

23*059

2 3 2 ,0 1 4
3 0 ,3 3 8

134,914

201,436

1 ,5 3 3 ,4 3 5

♦34,7*3*322

10*(

♦ 2, 660,353

l ,5 3 1 ,0 f i 5

232,724
113*341

12*439

2 75,571

$ 2 ,4 1 ^ 4 8 1

6,556

1,3*1,580
tat,

6 ,2 0 8
2 8 8 ,1 6 4

3 4 ,7 0 8 ,6 1 3
♦ 3 1 ,5 8 0 ,4 5 2 $ 3 7 ,1 2 7 ,4 9 2

8 «4§6

3*030*328
1*478,598

281,956

♦ 3 * 270,071
♦2 , 399,817 $2 , 184,097
1^3*355
1 * 8,958
162,730
--------= * »
- ----------- *1*584
7 2 ,6 « *
- ^ 4 > 2 ,0 3 ?

pther Commodities
f p ta l D u tie s -C o llected
Pbr Cont^Odliagfcsd

4 ,2 2 2 ,5 6 0
7**30,422
11*852,382

*244*803
3*397*524

1 ,5 3 1 ,0 i5
SPARKLING WINES(Liquid G a llo n s)
S toek in Customs Bended Ware­
hou ses a t b eg in n in g
T o ta l Im ports (F r e e and D u tia b le )
A v a ila b le f o r Consumption
Entered in t o Consumption ( a )

3*531*750
4 4 0 ,0 6 4

1 , 533,435

325*712

79*795

352,665
150,402

405,507
118,073

134,914

275*571

♦ 21*107,339

1 ** 29,264
* 5 1 ,8 4 6
« 2 3 ,3 8 8 ,4 4 J

839. ^ . 0OT

$262/ 987,536

♦ 20, 030,459
1 ** 91,305
694#4l6
*22,41^X 80
2 1 8 ,0 0 ^ 4 4 4
$240,421,624

9*^

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
OR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
n a s d a y . October 15. 1936,______
*
10-12-36.

P‘4 EH'

Press Service
8-65

Imports of distilled liquors and wines, and duties collected thereon, covering
the month of August, 1935, 1936, and the eight months1 period ended August 31, 1935
and 1936^ have been reported by the Commissioner of Customs in the following state—
~~

s
•

August
1936

i
:

July
1936

i
:

August
1935

:
:

8 Months (Jen - Aug)
1936_______ 1935______

XfïSTILLED LIQUORS
(Proof Gallons):
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
4,222,560 4,282,960
3,591,750
3,701,876
at beginning....• 3,757,209
Total Imports (Free
7,630,422 3,630,815
440^064
1,042,545
and dutiable)•.., 1,022,045
Available for Con11,852,982 7,913,775
4,744,421
sumpt ion......... 4,779,254
Entered into Con­
8,373,967 4,167,500
460,432
981,535
sumption (a).,... 1,351,041
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
3,397,524 3,501,472
3,501,472
3,757,209
at end....... . •• 3,397,524
STILL WINES:
(Liquid Gallons):
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
1,607,096 1,766,588
1,541,945
1,637,508
at beginning..... 1,559,000
Total Imports (Free
1,423,232 1,161,115
129,634
121,859
136,279
and dutiable)....
Available for Con3,030,328 2,927,703
1,671,579
1,759,367
sumption..«...*•• 1,695,279
Entered into Con1,478,598 1,361,580
132,129
197,955
164,214
sumption (a)....
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
1,531,065 1,539,435
1,539*435
1,559,000
&.<i/ end•#•#•••••## 1,531,065
SPARKLING WINES:
(Liquid Gallons):
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
325,712
232,724
281,956
216,919
201,436
at beginning.....
Total Imports (Free
79,795
119,941
6,208
15,095
16,581
and dutiable).....
Available for Con405,507
352,665
288,164
232,014
218,017
sumpt ion.
Entered into Con118,073
150,402
12,439
30,398
23,059
sumption (a).....
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
275,571
194.914
275.571
201.436
194.914
o/b end#••••##•»•»
DUTIES COLLECTED ON
$3,270,071 $2,399,817 $2,184,097 $21,107,339$20,030,459
Distilled Liquors
162,730
1,629,264 1,691,305
168,958
143,355
Still Wines
72«
654______
651.846
694,416,
91.584
68.613
Sparkling Wines
Total Duties Collected^
, ____ ^
on Liquors
$3,482,039 $2,660,359 $2,419,481 #23,388,449$22,416,180
(a) Including withdrawals for ship supplies and diplomatic use.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
Press Service
No, 8-66

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Tuesday, October 13, 1936,
10-12-36.

Supplementing the announcements made by him on January 31 and February 1,
1934, to the effect that the Treasury would buy gold, and on January 31, 1934,
referring to the sale of gold for export, the Secretary of the Treasury states
that (hereafter, and until, on twenty-four hours notice, this statement of
intention may be revoked or altered) the United States will also sell gold for
immediate export to, or earmark for the account of, the exchange equalisation
or stabilization funds of those countries whose funds likewise are offering to
sell gold to the United States, provided such offerings of gold are at such
rates and upon such terms and conditions as the Secretary may deem most
advantageous to the public interest.

The Secretary announces herewith, and

will hereafter announce daily, the names of the foreign countries complying
with the foregoing conditions.

All such sales of gold will be made through

the federal Reserve Bank of Hew York, as fiscal agent of the United States,
upon the following terms and conditions which the Secretary of

Treasury

deems most advantageous to the public interest:
Sales of gold will be made at $35 per fine ounce, plus
one-quarter per cent handling charge, and sales and earmarking
will be governed by. the Regulations issued under the Gold
Reserve Act of 1934.

0OOO 0

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE MORNING WBBSSÈBmS
Tuesday. October 13, 1936,... .
10/12/36

Pres^ Service
* b~

The Secretary of the Treasury today named. Great Britain and France as
complying with the conditions specified in his press release of October 13,
1936, for the purchase of gold from the United States for immediate export or

■ü

earmark.

The Commissioner of Customs "today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions
of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
October 3, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear
to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as
follows:

'A,

Z'-QK

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St* Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

:
:
:
:

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

:
:
:
:

152,017
97*6%

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,670
23.4^

28,222
3,647
22,438
231
77
562

1
—

11
904
-

44

-

7,084
42,781
1,436
1,328
3,133
22
592
290
19,773

515
2,498
664

131,616

4,670

-

m.
33
-

-

7,522
7,080
5,742
57

-

20,401

-

•
-

NOTE - The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been
filled.
(Pgaparad by DivjqVffl,

i

a

u

of Customs)

Sta
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

^

October 12, 1936.

TO MR. FUSSELL,
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period from
January 1 to October 3, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Tuesday, October 13, 1936,

Press Service
N°* 8~88

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary 'figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to October 3, 1936, and the percentage that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS

Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Verm .it
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
Sen Diego
Total from Mexico

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head')
152,017

.. .

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,670
O<
1 A<d

. 97*6jj&_-- „---- -------—— 23

28,222
3,647
22,438
231
77
562
--- »
7,084
42,781
1,436
1,328
3,133
22
59,2
290
13,773
131,616

1
11
904

•

44

33
g#**»

515
2,498
664 r
4,670

7,522
7,080

NOTE « The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds ea,ch has been filled.
ooOoo

October 12, 1936*

f
CONDENSED CHRONOLOGY OR ACTION WITH RESPECT' TO GOLD
March 6, 1933 to September 25, 1936.
March 6, 1933

March 9

- Banking holiday declared by proclamation of the President.
Banks prohibited from paying out or exporting gold; Govern­
ment offices prohibited from paying out gold except under
license.
• - Emergency Banking Act 'extended authority to regulate trans­
actions in gold, silver and foreign exchange,

March 10

U Export

April 5

U Gold

of gold prohibited by Executive Order except under
regulations or license.
and gold certificates required by Executive feirder to be
surrendered.

April 19

- Suspension of issuance Ôf licensee io export gold from the
United States for the purpose of supporting the dollar in
foreign exchange market.

April 20

— Executive Order defining authority of Secretary of Treasury
to issue licenses to export or earmark gold.

May 12

- President granted by Earm Reliéf Act additional powers
relating to currency and monetary matters, including the
p w e r to reduce the weight of the gold dollar,

June 5

- "Gold clauses11 declared invalid by resolution of Congress.

July 2

- President1s message to the London Economic Conference
stating monetary objectives,

August 29

- Sale to industry and abroad of domestic newly-mined gold
authorized by Executive Order.

October # 2

- President stated in radio address "it becomes increasingly
important to develop and apply further measures wnich may be
necessary from time to time to control the gold value of our
own dollar at home", and that "the United States must take
firmly in its own hands the control of the gold value of our
dollar11.

•ctober 25

— Reconstruction Finance Corporation authorized by Executive
Order to acquire newly-mined domestic gold.

January 30, 1934

- Gold Reserve Act (among other things) transferred to United
States title to all gold of Federal Reserve System; established
Stabilization Fund; provided that the weight of gold dollar
should not be fixed at more than 60$ of its existing weight,"

January 31

- Weight of gold dollar fixed by proclamation of the President
at 15-5/21 grains of gold 9/lOths fine.

January 31

— Regulations and statements issued governing transactions in
gold, and authorizing purchase of certain types of gold at the
rate of $35 per ounce less one-quarter of one per cent.
Secretary of the Treasury also announced that he would sell
gold for export to foreign central banks whenever our exchange
rates with gold standard currencies reached gold export point.

J a n u W y 10, 1936

- Powers conferred with respect to the Stabilization Fund and
the fixing of the weight of the gold dollar extended by
proclamation of the President until January 30, 1937.

September 25, 1936- Similar statements issued by France, Great Britain and
United States announcing a common policy with respect to
international monetary relations.

?

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

October 13, 1936,

RECEIPTS OE SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICESs
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 31, 1933) as amended
Week ended October 9, 1936:
Philadelphia.........................
San F r a n c i s c o ....
Denver............... ....... ,.......
Total for week ended October9, 1936...
Total receipts through October 9, 1936

271,163*81 fine ounces
H
684,372.84
»
H
.17.774*07
«
I!
973,310.72
n
M
105,848,915.75
»

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended October 9, 1936;
Philadelphia
.......
New York..,,,................. .
San Francisco..,........ ............
Denver,.....................
New Orleans,.,....,................
Seattle*................. .**,....,..
Total for week ended October 9, 1936,,
Total receipts through October 9, 1936

146*00 fine ounces
4,526.22
«
»
43.25

«

»

4,715*47
112,980,754.27

w
»

*
«

RECEIPTS OF GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Week ended October 9, 1936;
Philadelphia
New York.
San Francisco.
Denver,..............
New Orleans ..,.’*),*****’**
Seattle,
,,,,.,’*|\*
Total for week ended October 9

New
Imports_______
Secondary
Domestic
...... ;$
6,211.38 $102,257.67 $
937.05
..... .
119,568,000.00 169,200.00
79,500.00
.......
994,942.18
21,854.30 1,932,751.09
19,558.07
582,133.13
.......
53,522.82
.......
274.58
23,175.62
698.96
11.682.09
511,097.32
Ì936,,..$120,622,950.US $3577727775 f 371077117755
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
O F F IC E O F T H E S E C R E T A R Y

W A S H IN G T O N

COMMISSIONER OF
ACCOUNTS AND DEPOSITS

October 7, 1936»

TO MR. GASTON:

During the month of September* 1936, the following
market transactions took place in Government securities for invest­
ment accounts!
Total purchases • • . * * #47*448*650
Total sales

Net purchases:

10*000

#47,438*650

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Friday» October 16, 1936*

Press Servie
8-69

Net market purchases of Government securities for Treasury investment
accounts for- the calendar month of September, 1936, amounted to $47,438,650,
Secretary Morgenthau announced today.
ooOoo

TBE ASHBY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM POR THE PRESS

October 19, 1936.

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:.(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended October 16, 1936s
Philadelphia................. ............... .
San Francisco..............................
Denver...........................
.....
.
Total for week ended October 16, 1936.......
Total receipts through October 16, 1936.... .

534,320.96 fine ounces
it
If
H
H
It
11
It
H

SILVER TRAISFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended October 16, 1936:
Philadel-ohia
.... ........... .............
102.00 fine ounces
New York * --- ....................;....... ... ^ .. *
304.00
"
»
San F r a n c i s c o . ....*.............. ............ .. #
„ _
Denver ....... ................ ...... .
.
« « «
New Orleans ........ ................ ..............
.. ~
Seattle.............. .............. ..............
- ~ Total for week ended October 16, 1936.............
406,00
ir
H
Total receipts through October 16, 1936,.......... .112,981,160.27
«
#
RECEIPTS OE G-OLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
. •
New
Week ended October 16, 1936:
Imports___ _
Secondary
Domestic
Philadelphia........ .....
........$
5,862,96 $105,312.48 $
534.21
New York.,........... ... ..
....... 27,067,600.00
95,400,00
237,800.00
San Francisco....... .
........
643,022.74
26,396.02 1,343,030.16
Denver..,.... ..............
.. .----32,402.48.
17,394.60
746,135.67
New O r l e a n s ...... .......
17,373,77
- « ---- ~
Seattle,........... .
7.257.79
764.421.93
Total for week ended October 16, 1936.,$27,748,888.18 269,134.66. $3,091,721.97

Probably the nearest approach that this Govern*#at has ever mad® to

the system of double budget

was under

President Hoover In 1932 with the

application of the policy of showing the net expenditures of the

Recons traction Finance^ Corporation over anil above ill© amount of capital

stock as "public debt* transactions*

cluded in the analysis

of receipts

Such expenditures were not in­

and expenditures

of general

accounts either in the daily Treasury statement or in the

and the deficit of the Hoover administration

by this amount*

was

and special

àimml

Budget,

thereby understated

Hais method of treating the net expenditures of the

leçonstraction Finance Corporation was changed by the present administra­

tion on July 1, 1933* mo as to include1 them- along with other expenditures

%UL

aemx- accounting' metanas*

im the contrary they reveal that every change

made by the present administration has been in the direction of greater

clarity and ^emiier in reporting the receipts and expend!tores of public

funds

¡ip

ggg:

ir

■* Hooverju in «peaking of his Formula Ho* 1* states that one
Mr,

A

of the easiest methods of reducing Government expenditures is wJust don't

put them in before you announce the total**

There has .been much loose talk about trie use of a double budget

and double bookkeeping*

There is no such thing in the United States Govern­

ment as a double budget* nor is there any system of double bookkeeping*

Probably no government in the world and no business enterprise no matter

what its size* is more meticulous than the United States Treasury Department

in keep!ng'^end making public accounts of the money it receives and pays out«

In order that the public may be informed as to the uses made of the

funds appropriated the Treasury classifies its expenditures into two divisions,]
.

St

IS S

namely* "general” and "recovery and relief •* /jExpend-itw p » » -undsr-t^e^first-

ihe

A
iii)

»for

-'“mTHjjTr ny f— ■p r u i I These el&ssifioations do not indicate double bookkeeping

or In any sense a double budget*

They were adopted by the Treasury on «July 1»
$'' -

¿w •-

1933j so as to show the public the purpose for which the appropriations were us*

a:
available la various adairlsiretive accounting reports^\

la the

annual statement of receipts and expenditures submitted to the

Congress pursuant to Bee. 1$ ©f the Act of July 31# 1*994» the

Treasury has roportad detailed. information concerning expenditures

under both annual and recovery appropriations in the & *m manner as

has bmm ©«ployed over a long period of years*

Treasury ha® mads available as of June 30* 1936* a 509 page report

showiog the allotments and expenditures made under the lisergeaey

Belief Appropriation Act of 1935*

M s

statement start not only

the organisations to «hied the allotments were made* but the type

*10-

Bridget in the estimated expenditures for the year 1937# there appears

am item of $1,000,000 la home» type dB* m d * r the caption »Oils

Project Arisen*» and immediately following this item is another

item in the seae sis# type ^but in italics n6®^ for the purpose of

Emergency Itxpenditorea (Sncrgeney belief Act of 1935) #1,400,300**
This

method of

presentation conveys to the public the informatics

that the estimated eatpeaditur^|| on account of the &11* Beelsm t l n

I /" *
\As

Project in 1937 is #2,400,000, of which #1,000,000 m m

am annual appropriation and 11,100,000 from the appropriation provided

/ ^
im -the

Iheigeaegr Belief Appropriation. let of 1935*

1

d«» d e a r e r , simpler or more s ti^ht* forward «my of

presenting

in the most convenient form detailed information concerning the
expenditure of fuod& under the recwwmry and relief appropriations in
the «

al budget, bat the Treasury has mad® such Information dm©

thm annual appropriations of the various department* and establish-

•outs*

The Treasury considers it fundamental that expenditures fro*

the lump-sum appropriations wide available to the President for

recovery and relief b© accounted for separately fro* the funds granted

by the Congress to the departments la the annual appropriation acts,

It is to be noted, however, in this connection, that the Treasury

Depart»®»! in its annual reports and once each south in the daily

Treasury statement (published as of the 15th of the month} reports the

same Information with respect to expenditures from recovery and

relief funds as it does with respect to the expenditures from annual

appropriations, ordinarily referred to as general expenditures*

From the statement mad© by Hr* hoover, one would be led to

believe that expenditures from the recovery funds are concealed
l*/ lA*

t

through the use of small print^

This is not true.

The fact Is

that the detailed expenditures from recovery funds are printed in the

statements .in Italics)immediately following the related Item

payable fro* regular funds.

For example, on page A-lT of the lfJ7

,v.f. MAnd t M £ is & such more potent formula
far J n g g U a g scoreboard®,
In tile days of the old-tine
arithmetic the President and the Director of the i*udg@t
yearly fought each of the Federal bureau* over every item of

expenditures.

C&mgrem fought at the items and finally

* “ • a detailed appropriation for each of them, down to the
m l & r y of every clerk.»
*

.

X* di*cuesia^

»0- 3f disUftOtlon m e t be made between
c A

fin) irjj,,,i^mi-gil,M,

¿2*rw.y #

Titrate

S

£*^a»*4~' su*a*v e^4tAArpuLsJ2*wtA ftrv nMttr^uj CuJl
. . mmr fa,
't

Ju'L 6&fL~

0

mmy " nrimiw.™iau.ta^few iewi.d# 1'aTg^fi^hk'e?
ffMT&lft < r t l ^ -i-auxA.
.
.
...
7 / l f U « U < 4
and \me me
accounting and reporting a d o r e d ■
>t\

**** ^reseury Department in connection with such axpeadi'turcs.
¿s to the i o m e r , the Congress authorised President hoosevalt

to utilise the established departments and agencies of the Govern-

mmt ^

TO *

doting the unemployment problem.

the primary object

m t ? * * & • to *ork &md projects were not rejected simply be-

o m rn the/ S«r© of a type that had been carried on fcy established

Federal agencies.

In accounting sad reporting »ith r e s e c t to recovery expenditures

the T r e a s u r y * . followed the » a ® details systsn of accounting sad

reporting as

hue bam followed in connection »ith the htawilii»: of

Thus, in criticising the method of accounting for revolving funds

â^fpŸ'
used by the present administration Mr# Hoover is c o n d e m n i n g ^ practice^*! ch"

»end

IruT
One important ohangeCin the direction of a more complete report*

ing of these funds has been made by this administration*

The Daily Statement of the Treasury has ~gey*»eoas tim e

wttSSHmiwsd^he gross expenditures of^credit agencies of the Government
l ^ A c A
^ o p e r a t i c on revolving funds« as well as the repayments received on account

of loans made from such funds

Q X “C fcl
*6 '

AJLC^Ux-VV-iU

a

CÍ a .Q,^

?r&*£tujr'Hr¡\

—

of the Agricultural Marketing Act of June 15* 1929* Congress^appropriated

#500,000,000 as a revolving fund for use of the Federal F a m

repayments received up to February 28* 1933#

Board*

The

more than #650*000*000 on

account of loans made from this revolving fund were credited back to the

fund and thereby operated to offset expenditures in the fiscal years 1930-

33«

It will be seen that "under the old commandments” repayments to re­

volving funds were not* as alleged* covered into the Treasury and subse­

quently appropriated by the Congress*

The operations of all revolving funds have been handled in a

similar manner*

For instance* the operations of the Reconstruction Finance

Corporation during Mr* Hoover's administration reflected a net expenditure

of #1*572»000,000|

yet in arriving at this figure a credit of #366*000*000

was taken for repayments on loans previously made*

as an offset to gross ex­

penditures*

Had Mr* Hoover followed the principle underlying his so-called
>
I:.i | )
"old commandments” , he would not have taken credit for the repayments of

£ ^ ^ 4 3 0 8 * 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 and would have reported the gross expenditures of # 1 *9^0 ,000,000
/
f
;
instead of a net of # 1 *5 7 2 ,000*000*

*

"X

U.
VX

It beeoa#« partiaent to in<p*lrc what « r i il» Ö^d (^miaandaents.

lolita* ita uoo of revolving funde sor ita 'Treasury1o accounting prò-

ec&ure

in connection with the® Is new in Government finance,

Secretary Odioso* annual report for I9 19 ,

ta m i l od ita attention of ita Congress to the treasury* s objection

to this method of appropriating fonde»

He said in parti

"By each appropriations the revenues of the Government
affected never become unconditionally available to neat gen­
eral emendi tores, but are appropriated automatically for
epeelal purposes without further control by the Congress and
without any new consideration of the aeriti of the additional
expenditure. These appropriations by their rosy nature tend
to produce expenditures, which, if considered anew, might not
be authorised by the Congress and I believe that their discon­
tinuance, to the utmost limit possible, is an essential con­
dition of any p r o g » « for rigid economy In Government ex­
penditure. *

|u4

the fiscal year

^Secretary He^ton%\report

t^SÚy

IÜ
atte method of handling revolving funds in the Treasury Hally
Ä

Statement and in the Budget taip

P

M

p

aince I9 2 0 . Sta pro*

cedure today la the same pro cadere that was followed through president

huevea* s own administration.

ihr instance* under authority

Here ars President EooTer1» own words on tills subject sis con­
tained in his 1932 Budget Message to the Congress:
“In preparing the detailed statements of receipts and
expenditures contained in this Budget, X hays segregated
trust fond* from general funds and special funds, fhie has
Been done for the reason that trust ftmdg do not belong to
the federal Government, hut to the beneficiaries of the
trust: end,, in summarising the financial condition of the
Government, trust funds should therefore be excluded.*
He vent on to say that only general and special funds represent true Government transactions.
1 an not in disagreement with the changes thus effected by
direction of President Hoover. On the contrary the segregation
of trust fund transactions from the financial transactions of the
Government is in ay opinion a distinct improvement in budgetary
procedure and the reporting of financial data.
But whan Hr. loover ascribes responsibility for this change
to the present
,^ 1—'

"7"”.

!T
,

<=*tt»**h»vh e -Auseer sssa U

the

*TOWWk BG. XX: It has always been a rightful principle of Govern­
ment accounting under the old commandments to pay all receipts or
all fliml recoveries from revolving accounts into the treasury.
Than Congress appropriates them out and thus holds control of the
expenditures.*

• ï*

if

If

Mr. Hoover sot out Is lite address throe formulas which ho

oíala* the present Administration has adopted for the purpose of

making a distorted presentation of the expenditures of the Govern-

HQ. I t The Boosevelt Administration hap
hat made some beanti
fai eeoaoaies by just omitting certain iteas from its regular ex­
penditures before it comes to the tetáis announced to the people.
They appear only to aa appendix:« *
la illustrating the application of this formula he eitos ”th*

expenditures for Government trust accounts and for the District of

Colrabia paid hy the residente1*, and says these items •have been de­

leted from totale under President Boosevelt*.

fhe public record shoes that up to July 1, 1930, the Federal

Government did *put does all of the money spent on one side of the

ledger and every cent taken in on the other side of the ledger*, in­

cluding trust funds.

But oa May 1, 1930, President Hoover's Director

of the Budget «rote the Secretary of the Treasury, stating:

•She President has asked me to see i t appropriate
arrangements can be made for exhibiting the receipts and
expenditures of the Government in the Budget and in the
dally 'Treasury statements, separately under the captions
{¡BUSSAI* S V m , SPECIAL * » S , and T M 9 JTUiTDS. *

Beginning July 1, 1930, the daily Treasury statement was changed in

this respect to meet the utshss of President Soever,

IT p«rmilt«d to go uach&Xl«sng©df w m n

un^uoafeUwaifly inp&Xr the

confidence of the public la its financial official*, »ith consequent
d©trl®iiat.su. effect on the Fedex**! oredig«

What are the facts?

Tbs fact* «re that tbs Treasury accounts «re kept strictly is

accordance with la*, and are not based upon any partisan political

considerations.

The Treasury subnits to the Congress in accordance

with the law an annual report on the state of the finances, and a

detailed report of receipt* and expenditures of the “Orernhsat for

each fiscal year.

Furthermore, it publishes for every

day a statement showing the condition of the public Treasury.

% 8se

reports are fro* tine to tiae supplemented oy special reports.

The Treasury is constantly studying the for* of its reports, with a

¥lew 40

*«*

informative to the public, rad I believe it

can truthfully be said that ^Jl^Adninistrailon has furnished the

public aore detailed Inforaation on the financial operations of the

Qovernaent than any preceding ¿dainistretlon.

S m

e

w

-

¿*3

7u^nAavMju4.

H e f l L * ,

. "|Sa rm $ ip t$ and *xpmMtw?m& of •the Qov*vwtm% &re
(^*v I 4,A4<<£^U,fT^cf c

M;fl x^

rfeait

¿-7

aid«

I

*® tfiO h«at of t h m ^ c w ^ c d u p w , it ig a©t
1

uao«*»» for poHtic&i speakers to criUolat the expenditure pragma*
oi the

party in

office end in « a y l a s t « « «

tor political purposes in *

u a a e r ehlafc

the feet*

ere

presented

confuse« the paoiio Kind

m t* the real aitumtloa

— gytAfaraii'l

■^i© f r ^ a a r y dot*® aot\fcirtea'
at'
'

A g 1

■

~

—

*- ■

•*— •

) s**.
/

y$k® o f f i c i a l » o t i s t o f aritioi.® « diapeisted
II

at its methods of bookkeeping end filial reporting,

m « .

Ig*
§,-

a fomer President of the United States in « public address chafes

•sh* freasuiy of the United States rtth »intellectual. dishonesty*
"pam iaiona deceit» the public interest da*®«® 'that those charge*
tot ignored.

di& oltlft«&» naturally input* to ® former Prm«JLd«nt intinate
teosledge o f the fin a n c ia l operations o f the OovernaMOt, and whan
Kr. lo o k er a tta c k s th e in te g r ity o f the public accounts, h is s t a t e » « ts

<*

C^tw,
w

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, October 19, 1936.

Préss Service
ITo, 8-70

STATEMENT BY SECRETARY MORGENTHAU
The receipts and expenditures of the Government are frequently made an
important issue in Presidential campaigns.

In the heat of these campaigns, it is

not uncommon for political speakers to critieize the expenditure programs of the
party in office and in many instances the facts are presented for political pur­
poses in a manner which confuses the public mind as to the real situation.
The Tre asury does not orainari3.y attempt to check the accuracy of such
statements nor to take official notice of partisan criticism directed at its
methods of bookkeeping and financial reporting.

When, however, a former President

of the United States in a public address charges the Treasury of the United States
with ttintellectual dishonesty11 and Bpernicious deceit11 the public interest de­
mands that those charges be not ignored.
The citizens naturally impute to a former President intima,te knowledge of
the financial operations of the Government, and when Mr. Hoover attacks the
integrity of the public accounts, his statements, if permitted to go unchallenged,
might tend to impair the confidence of the public in itstfinancial officials,
with consequent detrimental effect on the Federal credit.
What are the facts?
The facts are that the Treasury accounts are kept strictly in accordance
with law, and are not based upon any partisan political considerations.

The

Treasury submits to the Congress in accordance with the law an annual report on
the state of the finances, and a detailed report of receipts and expenditures
°f the Government for each fiscal year.

Furthermore, it publishes for every

-

2

-

"business day a statement showing the condition of the public Treasury.
ports are from time to time supplemented by special reports.

These re­

The Treasury is

constantly studying the form of its reports, with a view to making them more in­
formative- to the public, and I believe it can truthfully be said that this
Administration has furnished the public more detailed information on the financial
operations of the Government than any preceding Administration,
Mr, Hoover set out in his address three “formulas” which he clplms the
present Administrât ion.has adopted for the<purpose of making a distorted presenta­
tion of the expenditures of the Government,
11FORMULA HO, 1: The Roosevelt Administration has male some beautiful economies
by just omitting certain items from its regular expenditures before it comes to
the totals announced to the people.
They* appear only in an appendix,”
In illustrating the application of this formula he cites “the expenditures
for Government trust accounts and for the District of Columbia paid by the
residents” , and says these items ”have been deleted from totals under President
Roosevelt”,
The public record shows that up to July 1, 1930, the Federal Government
did “put down all of the money spent on one side of the lodger and every cent
taken in on the other side of the ledger” , including trust funds.

But on May 1,

1930, President Hoover*^ Director of the Budget wrote the Secretary of the
Treasury* stating:
“The President has asked me to see if appropriate
arrangements can be made for exhibiting the receipts and
expenditures of the Government in the Budget and in the
daily Treasury statements, separately under the captions
GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL FUNDS, and TRUST FUNDS.”
Beginning Jnly 1, 1930, the Daily Treasury Statement was changed in this
respect to meet the wishes of President Hoover,

- 3 Here are President Hoover1s own words on this subject as con­
tained in h i s *1932 Budget Message to the Congress*
^In preparing the detailed statements of receipts and
expenditures contained in this Budget,
I have segregated
trust funds from general funds and special funds.
This has
been done for the reason that trust funds do not belong to
the ^Federal Government, but to the beneficiaries of the
trust; 'and, in summarizing the financial condition of the
Government, trust funds should therefore be excluded**’
He went on to say that only general and special funds repre­
sent true Government transactions*
I am not in disagreement with the changes thus effected by
direction of President Hoover.

On the contrary the segregation

of trust fund transactions from the financial transactions of the
Government is in my opinion a distinct improvement in budgetary
procedure and the reporting of financial data.
But when Mr. Hoover ascribes responsibility for this change
to the present Administration he misstates facts*
»PQHMtXLA HQ* XI l It has always been a rightful principle of Govern­
ment accounting under the old commandments to pay all receipts or
all final recoveries from revolving accounts into the Treasury*
Then Congress appropriates them out and thus holds control of the
expenditures* *
It becomes pertinent to inquire what were the ’’old commandments.”
Heither the use of revolving funds nor the Treasury1s accounting pro­
cedure in connection with them is new in Government finance*

In

Secretary Glass1 annual report for 1919, he called the attention of
the Congress to the Treasury1^ objection to this method of appropriating
funds*

He said in parti

- 4 -

”By such appropriations the revenues of the Government
affected never "become unconditionally available to meet general
expenditures, "but are appropriated automatically for special
purposes without further control "by the Congress and without
any new consideration of the merits of the additional expenditure.
These appropriations hy their very nature tend to produce expen­
ditures, which, if considered anew, might not "be authorized by
the Congress and I believe that their discontinuance, to the
utmost limit possible, is an essential condition of any program
for rigid economy in Government expenditure.n
Secretary Houston in his annual report for the fiscal year 1920,
repeated the seme objection.
There has been no change in the method of handling revolving
funds in the Treasury Daily Statement end in the Budget since 1920,
The procedure today is the same procedure that was followed throughout
President Hoover's own administration.

Bor instance, under authority

of the Agricultural Marketing Act of June 15, 1929, Congress, on the
recommendation of President Hoover, appropriated^$500,000,000 as a
revolving fund for use of the Bederal Barm Board.

The repayments

received up to Bebruary 28, 1933, of more than $650,000,000 on account
of loams made from this revolving fund wore credited ba„ck to the fund
and thereby operated to offset expenditures in the fiscal years 193033,

It will be seen that ’’under the old commandments” repayments to

revolving funds were not, as alleged, covered into the Treasury and
subsequently appropriated by the Congress,
The operations of all revolving funds have been handled in a
similar manner.

Bor instance, the operations of the Reconstruction

Binance Corporation during Mr, Hoover's administration reflected a net
expenditure of $1,572 ,000,000; yet in <arriving at this figure a credit of
$368,000,000 was taken for repayments on loans previously made, as an
offset to gross expenditures.
Had Mr. Hoover followed the principle underlying his so-called
w old commandments” , he would not have taken credit for the repayments of

$368,000,000 and would have reported the gross expenditures of
$lè940,000,000 instead of a net of $1, 572,000,000.
QÜhus, in criticizing the method of accounting for revolving
funds used by the present administration Mr* Hoover is condemning
his own practice*
One important change, hut in the direction of a more complete
reporting of these funds has heen made by this administration*

The

Daily Statement of the Treasury has since December 1, 1934 shown
separately the gross expenditures of those corporations and credit
agencies of the Government which operate on revolving funds, as well
as the repayments received on account of loans made from such funds*
•FORMULA, flTO.« 3 jt **And this is a much more potent formula for
juggling scoreboards.
In the days of the old-time .arithmetic
the President and the Director of the Budget yearly fought each of
the Federal bureausover every item of expenditures*
Congress fought
at the items and finally made a detailed appropriation for each of
them, down to the salary of every clerk*w
In discussing formula Ho* 3, distinction must be made between the
manner in which the Congress had made available for expenditure lump-sum
appropriations-'f^r recovery and relief, on the one hand, and, on the
other hand, the accounting and reporting procedure of the Treasury
Department in connection with such expenditures*
As to the former, the Congress authorized President Roosevelt to
utilize the established departments and agencies of the Government
in meeting the unemployment problem*

primary object was to put

people to work and projects were not rejected simply because they were
of a type that had been carried on by established Federal agencies*
In accounting and reporting with respect to recovery expenditures
the Treasury followed the same detailed system of accounting and
reporting as has been followed in connection with the handling of

6 —
the annual appropriations of the various departments and establishments.
The Treasury considers it fundamental that expenditures from the
lump-sum appropriations made available to the President for recovery
and relief be accounted for separately from the funds granted by the
Congress to the departments in the annual appropriation acts.
to be noted, however, in this connection,

It is

that the Treasury Department

in it's annual reports and once each month in the Daily Treasury State­
ment (published as of the 15th of the month) reports the same informa­
tion with respect to expenditures from recovery and relief funds as it
does with respect to the expenditures from annual appropriations,
ordinarily referred to as general expenditures,
From the statement made by Mr. Hoover, one would be led to
believe that expenditures from the recovery funds are concealed through
the use of small print in the Budget statements..

This is not true.

The fact is that the detailed expenditures from recovery funds are
printed in the Budget statements in italics of the sane size type,
immediately following the related item payable from regular funds.
For example, on page A— 47 of the 1937 Budget in the estimated
expenditures for the year 1937, there appears an item of $1,000,000
in Roman type under the caption **Gila Project Arizona** and immediately
following this item is another item in the same size type, but in
italics for the purpose of fund identification, under the caption
**Gila Project Arizona-Emergency Expenditures (Emergency Relief Act
of 1935) $1,400,000,**

This method of presentation conveys to the public

the information that the estimated expenditure on account of the Gila
Reclamation Project in 1937 is $2,400,000, of which $1,000,000 is

- 7 payable from an annual appropriation and $1*400,000 from the
appropriation provided in the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act
of 1935*

I know of no clearer,

simpler or more straight-forward way

of presenting figures*
Not only has President Roosevelt made available in the most
convenient form detailed information concerning the expenditure
of funds under the recovery and relief appropriations in the annual
budget, but the Treasury has made such information also available in
various administrative accounting reports, which give far greater
detail than was customary in earlier practice*

In the annual state­

ment of receipts and expenditures submitted to the Congress pursuant
to Sec* 15 of the Act of July 31, 1894, the Treasury has reported
detailed information concerning expenditures under both annual and
recovery appropriations in the same manner as has been employed over
a long period of years.

In addition, the Treasury has made available

as of June 30, 1936, a 509 page report showing the allotments and
expenditures made under the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935,
This statement shows not only the organizations to which the allotments
were made, but the type of work for which the allotments were made and
the States in which the work was done.
Mr, Hoover charges that the Treasury has resorted to "double
bookkeeping* and,in speaking of M s Eormula No, 1, states that one
of the easiest methods of reducing Government expenditures is "just
don't put them in before you announce the total**
There has been much loose talk about the use of a double budget
and double bookkeeping.

There is no such thing in the United States

Government as a double budget, nor is there any system of double

bookkeeping,

Probably no government in the world and no business

enterprise, no matter what its size, is more meticulous than the
United States Treasury Department in keeping and making public
accounts of the money it receives and pays out.
In order that the public may be informed as to the uses made
of the funds appropriated, the Treasury classifies its expenditures
into ,two divisions, namely, ngeneralM and ^recovery and relief*11
These classifications do not indicate double bookkeeping or in
any sense a double budget.

They were adopted by the Treasury on

July 1, 1933, so as to show the public the purpose for which the
appropriations were used.
Probably the nearest approach that this Government has ever
made to the system of double budget was under President Hoover in
1932 with the application of the policy of showing the net expen­
ditures of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation over and above
the amount of capital stock as ^public debtrt transactions. Such
expenditures were not included in the analysis of receipts and
expenditures of general and special accounts either in the daily
Treasury statement or in the Annual Budget,, and the deficit of the
Hoover administration was thereby understated by this amount.
This method of treating the net expenditures of the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation was changed by the present administration on July
1, 1933, so as to include them along with other expenditures in
the Budget statement.

- 9 No effort has been made here to reply to all of Mr. Hoover's
charges.

But the facts do not support any

of his

criticisms of

Government accounting and reporting methods. On the contrary they
reveal that every change made by the present administration has
been in the direction of greater clarity and completeness in reporting
the receipts.and expenditures of public funds.

00O 00

\

treasury departs »

WASHINGTON
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. October 20. 1936.
10/19/36

Press Service

secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced
last evening that the tenders for #50,000,000, or thereabouts,
of 273-day Treasury bills, dated October 21, 1936, and matur­
ing July 21, 1937, which were offered on October 16, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on October 19,
The total amount applied for was #172,935,000, of
which $50,060,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in

price from 99.909, equivalent to a rate of 0.120 percent per
annum, to 99.902, equivalent to a rate of about 0.129 percent
per annum, on a bank discount basis.

Only part of the amount

bid for at the latter price was accepted.

The average price

of Treasury bills to be issued is 99.906 and the average rate
is about 0.124 percent per annum on a bank discount basis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday, October 20. 1936.______

Press Service
No. 8-71

10-19-36.
Secretary of the Treasury M 0rgenthau announced last evening that the tenders
for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated October 21, 1936,
and maturing July 21, 1937, which wei*e offered on October 16, were opened at the
Federal Reserve Banks on October 19,
The total amount applied for was $172,935,000, of which $50,060,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.909, equivalent to a rate

of 0.120 percent per annum, to 99.902, equivalent to a rate of about 0.129
percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for

The average price of Treasury bills to be

issued is 99.906 and the average rate is about 0.124 percent per annum on a
bank discount basis.
ooOoo

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
October 10, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to
the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts
'
TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

: Cattle 700
:
Pounds
: Or More
:
(Head)
152,858
98.1%

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth 5c Superior
Maine 5c New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana 5c Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

7,094
42,823
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
592
290
20,001

Total from Canada

132,457

PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

28,527
3,647
22,590
231
77
562
—

7,522
7,080
5,742
57
20,401

i
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,794
24.0%

1
».

12
».

915
..

44
».
».

34

•<kt9
515
2,540
733
4,794

.»
».

—

—
——

NOTE- The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each ha®
been filled.

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

TO MR* FUSSELL,

(Room S89- Treasury Department)
FROM MR* FREEMAN:

There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period
January 1 to October 10, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 50
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

TR EA SU R Y

DEPARTM ENT

Washington
for

im m e d ia t e

r e l e a s e

Press Service
No. 8-72

,

Tuesday, October 20, 1936.

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to October 10, 1936, and the percentage that such
allowable under the quota* provisions, as follows;
imports bear to the totals i

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

Dairy Cows
Cattle 700
700 Pounds
Pounds
Or More
Or More
(Head)
(Head)
4,794
152,858
______ ___________ 98.1#_____________________ 24.0#

Mm

CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dcko ts
.
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St, Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada

28,527
3,647
22,590
231
77
562
- —
7,094
42,823
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
592
290
20,001
132,457

PROM MEXICO
Arizona
SI Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,522
7,080
5,742
57
20,401

NOTE:

The quota on cattle weighing lesh'than 175 pounds
ooOoo

1
- - 12
- - 915
- - 44
~
—

—

— «

—
34

~

— —
~

— — —

515
2,540
733
4,794

~

~

~

M>.
»

— —

— ~

—

— — —

eìach iias

been filled.

TREASURY DEPARTAIENT
Washington

Press Service
No.
-73

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Friday, October 23, 1956»

The secretary of the Treasury today announced that the Greek
Government transferred to the United States Treasury on October E l ,
1936, the sum of #108,960.

Of this amount, #10,896 represents an

additional 5$ of the semiannual interest amounting to #217,920 due
May 10, 1935; #10,896 represents an additional 5$ of the semiannual
interest amounting to #217,920 due Novenber 10, 1935, (increasing
to 40$ the payment of interest due on those dates) and #87,168
represents 40$ of the semiannual interest amounting to #217,920
due May 10, 1936, all on Uie 4$ loan of 1929.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Friday, October 23, 1936.

Press Service
Uo* 8-73

The Secretary of the Treasury today announced that the Greek Government
transferred to the United States Treasury on October 21, 1936, the sum of
$108,960*

' Of this amount, $10,896 represents an additional 5$ of the semi­

annual interest amounting to $217,920 due May 10, 1935; $10,896 represents an
additional 5$ of the semiannual interest amounting to $217,920 due November 10,
1935 (increasing to 40$ the payment of interest due on those dates) and
$87,168 represents 40$ of the semiannual interest amounting to $217,920 due
May 10, 1936, all on the 4$ loan of 1929.

— oOo—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
W
Washington
Press Service
No. 8-74

FOR RELEASE UPON DELIVERY.
10-23— 36.

Address of the Secretary of the Treasury
to he delivered at the Business Men1s
Dinner under the auspices of the Good
Neighbor League at the Waldorf-Astoria
Hotel in New York, Friday evening,
October 23. 1 9 3 6 . ______

I am here to report to you, the stockholders of America, about the
financial management of your great corporation, the United States Government.
What I shall say looks more to the future than to the past, because I believe
it is in the future that you are particularly interested.
Since President Roosevelt took office in March, 1933, manufacturing employ­
ment has risen 50 per cent; manufacturing payrolls have doubled; prices paid to
farmers have more than doubled; the market price of corporate bonds has risen
50 per cent.
The Federal Reserve Board index of industrial production is, I think, the
most comprehensive measure of business activity that we have.
in March, 1933.

It stood at 59

Today it is approximately 109.

These facts speak for themselves.

They are confirmed by the first-hand

experience of every man and woman in the range of my voice.
combined efforts of the whole Nation —

They represent the

efforts which were made effective by the

financial policies adopted and carried out by this Administration.
Just what were those policies?
First, we brought the value of our currency into a more satisfactory
relation with the currencies of other countries.

By that step we stopped a

disastrous deflation in the United States and brought about an immediate and
still growing revival in our foreign trade.

W e broke the shackles that were

dragging us down.

Thirty nations had preceded us in readjusting their curren­

cies; virtually all the rest have followed us.
The soundness and stability of the American dollar are now recognized
throughout the world.

That didn*t just happen.

It is the result of monetary

policies that have been carefully formulated and executed.
In the past month a new step has been taken.

Great Britain and France have

joined with us in a common effort to maintain equilibrium in international
exchange,

W© hope that this cooperation will provide the basis for freeing

international trade from excessive restrictions.
bution to the cause of international peace.
that each must, as a first consideration,

We believe it is a real contri­

The three nations agree, of course,

safeguard its own internal prosperity.

The second major element in our fiscal policies was our decision to pro­
vide safety for bank depositors, protection for farms #nd homes, jobs for the •
unemployed, and relief for the needy, at a time when no other agency in this
country, public or private, was equal to the task.
We restored the buying power of our people.
As.the P resident has so aptly said, we made an investment in the future of
America.

It has rebuilt both human and material values.

It is now paying large

dividends to every man, woman, and child in the United States#
But some people aski

Could we afford this investment?

We couldn* t afford not, to make it.

Th© answer is*

The future of our country, of our democratic

form of Government, and the lives and well-being of 125 million persons were at
stake.
Others ask:

How are we going to pay for it?

paid for out of the dividends of recovery.

The fact is, it is being

This brings me to the third and

final major financial policy of this Administration —

taxation.

~ 3 It would have been popular among certain groups of our population to have
raised additional revenues by new excise and sales taxes

taxes that would

have fallen most heavily on those least able to pay*
What did we do?

First, we borrowed to meet the emergency.

Later, when

incomes were growing larger as a result of recovery, we revised the tax system
so as to make it fully adequate to meet the future revenue needs of the Federal
Government.

We did this by providing taxes based upon.the democratic principle

of ability to pay —

primarily income and estate taxes.

Through the Revenue Acts

of 1934, 1935 and 1936,we lowered the effective rates of taxation on small
individual incomes and on small corporation incomes, but we raised a n d m a d e more
fully effective the rates of income tax on those best able to.pay them.
Our revenue receipts have not yet shown the full effect of these tax changes.
The bulk of collections under the 1935 and the 1936 Revenue Acts will begin to
come in nekt year.

But our increased receipts already show the effects of

business recovery and the great improvement in our tax structure.
Total revenues of the Federal Government have increased substantially in
every year of the present Administration. In the fiscal year ended last June, our
revenues were nearly twice as large as they were in 1933; and, during the

.

present fiscal year, we count on a further increase of more than one-third.
These facts reveal how groundless are the fears,voiced for campaign
purposes, of the soundness of our fiscal position.

r 4 -

We have so improved and strengthened the Federal tax structure that
it is providing additional revenues easily sufficient to insure an early
■balancing of the budget and thereafter a rapid reduction in the public
debt.
Some persons who, to put it mildly, are not too friendly to this Adminis­
tration, are loudly and frequently asserting that our policies will bring
inflation, and endanger the value of savings bank accounts, life insurance
policies, and other forms of savings,
!Phe facts I have cited, as to the continued and rapid increase of our
revenues, furnish a complete answer to these fears.
If there was anything further needed to clinch the fact that there is
no such danger, it was supplied this year by the President and the Congress,
In January the President i n his budget message told Congress that any ex­
penditures added to the budget and any loss of revenues must be financed
sy taxes#

In June Congress, carrying out the President's recommendations,

provided the supplementary revenues.
It took both courage and statesmanship on the part of the President and
of the Democratic Congress to enact an important piece of revenue legislation
less than five months before a national election, but it constituted your
final assurance that the fiscal policies of this Administration are and will
continue to be sound#
Four years ago great financial structures were collapsing and values
of all kinds were disappearing#

It was then that life insurance policies

and the p e o p l e d savings and investments were in danger.
danger now#

They are not in

The man who says they are is just four years behind the times,

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

October 26, 1936,

RECEIPTS OE SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFEICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 2L, 1933) as amended
Week ended October 23, 1936;
Philadelphia....... ........ .....<................
343, 234,12 fine ounces
San Erancisco.................. ............ .
750¿.191,08
Denver .............................. .......... .
8,797.20
"
»
Total for week ended October 23, 1.936.............
1,107,222.40
Total receipts through October 23, 1936.......... 107,732,630,02
SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, IPS**)1
Week ended’-October 2 3 ; 1936?.
Philadelphia. ............... - .......
N rw YorkTT..... T.....................
ghn Pranc-i sco
.............
T)cs’
mrp>T’................................
O t*1 pane...................... .
Seattle....................... .......
Total for week ended October 23, 1936..
Total receipts through October 23, 1936

.
4 155,00 fino ounces
if
tt
542 •00
if
»
263,00
........

u.I »

M
4,958.00

ir
ii

«
it

RECEIPTS OF GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Imports
Week ended October 23, 1936;
$
8,765.58
Philadelphia............... ....... .
N pw Y<~>rk ............................ 7,436,400.00
San Francisco....... . . ......... * . . . 1*495*879c64
'26,599e03
Denver...............................
New Orleans......... ........ ..... .
2,321.76
Seattle....... ...... ....... ........ i ------------Total for week ended October 23, 1936..$9,028,466.01

New
Domestic
Secondary
1,328.84
$102,,433.48 $
94,500.00
153,300.00
28,334.04 1 ,535,446.99
658,289.24
•31,768.11
20,041.25
436.36
14,377.63 1,114,789. .67
$550,254.51 $3,404,791.10

i
♦
:
:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)
153,326
98.4%

:
;
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,866
24.3%

FROM CANADA.

Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana Sc Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

28,622
3,647
22,666
231
77
562

1
—

12
—

925
—

—

44

7,094
42,913
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
594
290
20,206

— -—
527
2,553
770

Total from Canada

132,925

4,866

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,522
7,080
5,742
57
20,401

NOTE:

—
—-

34
-—

— -

-—
——

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each
has been filled.
hy

nivi giriiL,A£Ms j ^ i<afcA*».^w^B<»aaOTiflh»i«-&UBaan~Q£ Customs) ^

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
October 17, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to
the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

O FFIC E OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

October 26, 1936,

TO ME. TO SSEIX

(Room 289- Treasury Department)

FROM MR. FREEMAN:

There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period
from January 1 to October 17, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have S?ér
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Monday, October 26, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-75

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement,
for the period January 1 to October 17, 1936, and the percentage that such
imports bear to the totals .allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts
... - --i
- ... .-_ ..
TOTAL IMPORTS
Por Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

NOTE:

.

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)
153,326
98.4$

28,622
3,647
22,666
231
77
562

:
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
4,866
24.3 $

1
12
925
-------------------- ----

44

—

7,094
42,913
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
594
290
20.206
132,925

7,522
7,080
5,742
57
20,401

34

------------------------ --

527
2,553
770
4,866

— —

—

—

.

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been filled.
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. October 27. 1936.
10/26/36

Press Service

(
°

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last
evening that the tenders for 150,000,000, or thereabouts, of
273-day Treasury bills, dated October 28, 1936, and maturing
July 28, 1937, which were offered on October 23, were opened
at the Federal Reserve banks on October 26.
The total amount applied for was 1176,251,000, of which
150,159,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price

from 99.916, equivalent to a rate of about 0.111 percent per
annum, to 99.907, equivalent to a rate of about 0.123 percent
per annum, on a bank discount basis.

Only part of the amount

bid for at the latter price was accepted.

The average price

of Treasury bills to be issued is 99.909 and the average rate
is about 0.120 percent per annum on a bank discount basis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,-Tuesday« October 27, 1936.______
10—26— 36.

Press Service
No. 8-76

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the ten­
ders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury hills, dated October
28, 1936, and maturing July 28, 1937, which were offered on October 23, were
opened at the Federal Reserve Banks on October 26.
The.total amount applied for was $176,251,000, of which $50,159,000 was
accepted*

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.916, equivalent to a

rate of about 0*111 percent per annum, to 99.907, equivalent to a rate of
about 0,123 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
amount bid for at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the

The average price of Treasury

bills to be issued is 99.909 and the average rate is about 0.120 percent per
annum on a bank discount basis*
oOOo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday,-October 31* 1936,
10/30/36

Press Service
? — ‘V j

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced
last evening that the tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts,
of 373-day Treasury bills, dated November 4, 1936, and matur­
ing August 4, 1937, which were offered on October 38, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on October 30.
The total amount applied for was $147,017,000,
of which 150,113,000 was accepted*

The accepted bids ranged

in price from 99.915, equivalent to a rate of about 0.112 per­
cent per annum, to 99*909, equivalent to a rate of 0*120 per­
cent per annum, on a bank discount basis*

Only part of the

amount bid for at the latter price was accepted*

The average

price of Treasury bills to be issued is 99*913 and the average
rate is about 0.115 percent per annum on a bank discount basis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Press Service
No. 8-77

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Saturday. Gctober 31, 1936.____
10/30/36

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenth.au announced last evening that the tenders
for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury bills, dated November 4, 1936,
and maturing August 4, 1937, which were offered on October 28, were opened at the
Federal Reserve banks on October 30.
The total amount applied for was $147,017,000, of which $50,113,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 990915, equivalent to a rate

of about 0.112 percent per annum, to 99.909, equivalent to a rate of 0.120 per­
cent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for at

The average price of Treasury bills to be issued

is 99.913 and the average rate is about 0.115 percent per annum on a bank dis­
count basis«

— oOo—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

MEMORANDUM ..FOR THE PRESS:

November 2, 1936.

RECEIPTS OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES.»
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended October 30, 1936:
Philadelphia.... .....................
San Francisco........................
Denver...„..... -. ....... ..............
Total for week ended.October 30, 1936..
Total receipts through October 30, 1936

521,340.59 fine ounces
u / .M
644,632.70
H
I!
5.137.41
tf
r*
1,171,110.70
If
t>
108,903,740^72

SILVER. TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES;
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended October 30, 1936.:
Philadelphia .............................
New York .. .. ................................
San Francisco................................... .
Denver ............. ............
New Orleans ..................... .............. * ’
Seattle........................
Total for week ended October 30, 1936.............
Total receipts through October 30, 1936'........ ...

94.00 fine ounces
1,797.00
»
"
171.00
"
»

2,062.00
112,988,180.27

"
»

«
n

RECEIPTS OF G-QLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICE'S:
New
Week ended October 30, 1936:
- Imports
Secondary_____ Domestic
Philadelphia................... ..... $
7,378.11$ 86,824.01 $ ----------New York ..................
..... 1 8 j454,600.00 117,700.00
40 500.00
San Francisco ...........
91,439.72
16,325.32 1,104|454*.83
Denver........ .................
36,836.71
16,539.27
660,487.09
New Orleans...................
--- 6,732.20 18,379.10
------- -Seattle........................
• •• ••
7.379.64
771.208.70
Total for week ended October 30, 1936..$18,596,986.74$263,147.34 $2,576,650.62
ooOoo

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

November 3, 1936.

TO MR. FUSSELL

(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMÄN:

There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quota
provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the pèriod
from January 1 to October 24, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed, please have 55
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
October 24, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to
the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St* Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

NOTE:

:
•
;

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)
154,046
98*9$

28,622
3,647
22,752
231
77
562
7,094
43,018
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
594
290
20,593

:
:
:
.

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
5,022

25*1$

1
•
12
948
- :
44
34
576
2,578
829

133,503

5,022

7,522
7,080
5,884
57

—

20,543

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds
each has been filled*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, November 3, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-78

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for
the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade
Agreement, for the period January 1 to October 24, 1936, and the percentage
that such imports bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions,
as foll'ows:-

Customs Districts

:
:
:
:

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

154,046
98.9$

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Ma s sachu se 11 s
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total From Canada

28,622
3,647
22,752
231
77
562
—
7,094
43,018
1,540
1,328
3,133
22
594
290
20,593
133,503

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

NOTE:

:
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
5,022
25.1 $

1
—

12
-

948
—
44
—
—

34
_
-

576
2,578
829
5,022

7,522
7,080
5,884
57

—
—
—
—

20,543

-

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds
each has been filled.

SEPTEMBER 1936
tSeptember: August : September : 9 Months (Jan* - Sept*)
■ me
> 1?3< ■- 1 3 3 5 ■ . W3i
>
1935

DISTILLED LIQUORS (Prtiff Gallons):
Stock in Customs Bonded Ware­
3,398,234 3*757#919
houses at beginning
1,027,487 1,022,045
Total Imports (Free and Dutiable)
Available for Consumption
4,425,721 4,779*964
1 , 00 0 ,261
1,351,041
Entered into Consumption (a)
Exported from CustomjjCLuotody ——----- •----~ 5r480~~•**~*3^^9*
Stock in Customs Bonded Warehouses
3 , 4 15 ,9 8 0
3 , 39 8 ,234
at end
STILL WINES (Liquid Gallons):
Stock in Customs Bonded Warehouses at beginning
Total Imports (Free and Dutiable)
Available for Consumption
Entered into Consumption (a)
Stock in Customs Bonded Warehouses
at end
SPARKLING WINES (Liquid Gallons):
Stock in Customs Bonded Ware­
houses at beginning
Total Imports (Free and Dutiable)
Available for Consumption
Entered into Consumption (a)
Export-ad -g-g-om Cuetoms Cuat ady—
Stook in Customs Bonded Warehouses
at end
________ ________
DUTIES COLLECTED CHI:
D istilled Liquors
S t i l l Wines
Sparkling Wines
Total Duties Collected on Liquors

3,501,472
560,777
4,062,249
6 4 7,879

4,222,560
8,657*909
12,880,469
9*373*518

4,282,960
4,191*592
8,474,552
4, 815,379
,„£5 7 *416

3,401,757

3,415*980

3 *4 0 1 , 7 5 7

1 *607*096
1*531*065 1 , 5 5 9 ,0 0 0 1,539*435
1
, 6 0 8 ,0 0 1
1
0
9
,
6
8
9
184,769
136,279
1,649,124
1*715*834 1*695*279
3,215,097
164,556
164,214
1 *6 9 6 ,9 0 9
2 18 ,3 11
-—-----1.294_, ——

1 , 76 6 ,5 8 8

—

1*497*275

1,483,274

2 7 5 ,5 7 1

232,72 4

6,927

325,712
86,722

28 2,4 9 8

158 ,0 79
39 0 ,8 0 3

19 ,8 6 6

18 8 ,29 4

1,497*275

1,531,065

1,483,274

194,914

201,43£

3 8 ,13 8

16,581
218,017

23,059

233,052
37,892

•- W —

--------4 4 .

195,160

114 ,0 30
$2 , 7 6 4 , 3 4 7

262,445

194,914

$2,451,251 $3,270,071
1 9 9 , 086
14 3 ,3 5 5
6 8 ,6 13
$3 , 4 8 2 , 0 3 9

1,270,804
3 , 0 37,392
1 *5 2 6 ,1 3 6
27,982

~loi!L

4 12 ,4 34

137,939
12 ,0 5 0
MNnRWWNMM^''

262,44j_

l95,lgQ„

$3,082,180 $2 3 , 5 5 5 , 0 2 0
20 4 ,7 2 6
1 , 8 28 ,350
1 1 6 , 6 1 0 _____ 7 6 5 , 8 7 6
$3 , 4 0 3 , 5 1 6
$2 6 , 1 4 9 , 2 4 6

$23,112,639
1,896,031
811,026

$25,819,696

To^

fmnmediiii »g
Percent ColLfleted-

... 1,1

-Li«*

(a) Including withdrawals for ship supplies and diplomatic use,
L

8,896

—

“ ~ * A"

Treasury Department
Washington

o

f

/

For Release ftimliy morning newspapers
Sunday, November 8, 1936
Imports of distilled liquors and wines,and duties collected thereon,
covering the month of September ,1936, have been reported by the Commissioner of
Customs as shown in the following statements

V

fSEASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
W RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Sunday«■ November 8, 1336»_______

Press Service
No# 8— 79

11- 6- 3 6 .
Imports of distilled liquors and wines, and duties collected thereon, covering
the month of September, 1936, have been reported by the Commissioner of- Customs as
shown in the following statement:
September
1936

August
1936

September
1935

9 Months (J an. - Sept.)
1936
1935

DISTILLED LIQUORS:(Proof Gallons):Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
4,222,560
at beginning...., 3,398,234 3,757,919 3,501,472
4,282,960
Total Imports (Eree
560,777
8,657,909
4,191,592
and dutiable..... 1,027,487 1,022,045
Available for Con­
8,474,552
sumption,4,425,721 4,779,964 4,062,249 12,880*469
Entered into Con­
647,879
9,373,518
4,815,379
sumption (a). .,.. 1,000,261 1,351,041
Stock in Customs
Bonded W arehouses
3,401,757
at end........ ..
3,415,980
3,415,980 3,398,234 3,401,757
STILL WINES:
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at beginning.... 1,531,065 1,559,000 1,539,435
1,607,096
1,766,588
Total Imports (Free
1,270,804
and dutiable)....
184,769
109,689
1,608,001
136,279
Available for Con­
sumption. ...... .
3,215,097
3,037,392
1,715,834 1,695,279 1,649,124
Entered into Con—
164,214
1,526,136
sumption (a).....
218,311
164,556
1,696,909
Stock in Customs
Bonded ¥ arehouses
1,483,274
at end......... . 1,497,275 1,531,065 1,483,274
1,497,275
SPARKLING WINES:
(Liquid Gallons)
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
232,724
325,712
at beginning....
194,914
275,571
201,436
Total Imports (Free
86,722
6,927
158,079
and dutiable)....
16,581
38,138
Available for Con­
412,434
sumption. ...... ..
390,803
218,017
282,498
233,052
Entered into Con­
188,294
137,939
sumption (a)....
23,059
19,866
37,892
Stock in Customs
Bonded Warehouses
at end........
262.445
■ 194,914
195.160
262.445
195.160
DUTIES COLLECTED ON:'
Distilled Liquors \
$2,451,231 $3,270,071 $3,082,180 $23,555,020 $23,112,639
Still Wines
1,896,031
1,828,350
204,726
199,086
143,355
811.026
Sparkling Wines
765.876
68,613
116.610
114,030
Total duties collec­
ted on Liquors
$2,764,347 $3,482,039 $3,403,516 $26,149,246 $25,819,696
(&) Including withdrawals for shin supplies and diplomatic use.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE» MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Saturday. November 7. 1936,--11/6/36

Press Service
O , p ..
®

Acting Secretary of the Treasury Taylor announced
last evening that the tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts,
of 374-day Treasury bills, dated November 10, 1936, and matur­
ing August 11, 1937, which were offered on November 4, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on November 6.

The total amount applied for was $137,136,000, of
whioh $50,145,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in

price from 99.926, equivalent to a rate of about 0.097 percent
per annua, to 99.918, equivalent to a rate of about 0.108 per­
cent per annum, on a bank discount basis. Only part of the
amount bid for at the latter price was accepted. The average
price of Treasury bills to be issued is 99.919 and the average
rate is about 0.106 percent per annum on a bank discount basis

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
gnturday. November 7. 1936______
11-6-36.

Press Service
No* 8-SO

Acting Secretary of the Treasury Taylor announced last evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 274-day Treasury hills, dated
November 10,. 1936, and maturing August 11 r 1937, which were offered on November
4, were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on November 6*
The total amount applied for was $137,136,000, of which $50,145,000 was
accepted* The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.926, equivalent to a rate
of about 0.097 percent per annum, to 99.918, equivalent to a rate of about 0.108
percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for

The average price of Treasury bills to be

issued is 99,919 and the average rate is about 0*106 percent per annum on a
bank discount basis.
JDOOOO

thkasury d k p a h m b n t

WaMUagton
;

FOB I U D i m BBLBASK
Saturday, Bovsmbar 7« 1,986

' '

^ • -/’y )

•

1V

Service
* “•

The Secretary of the Treasury today announced
that the Greek Government transferred to the United States
Treasury cm November 6, 1936, the sum of #B7,168 representing
40% of the semiannual Interest amounting to #217,980 due
November 10, 1936, on the 6% loan of 1989 made to that
Government by the United States«

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday» November 7» 1956

Press Service
No* ^

The Secretary of the Treasury today announced
that the Greek Government transferred to the United States
Treasury on November 6t 1936, the sum of $87,168 representing
40$ of the semiannual interest amounting to $217,920 due
November 10, 1936, on the 4$ loan of 1929 made to that
Government by the United States*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Tíashingt on

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, November 7, 1956.

Press Service
No,. 8-81

The Secretary of the Treasury today announced that the
Greek Government transferred to the United States Treasury on
November 6, 1936, the sum of :)87,168 representing

43%

of the

semi-annual interest amounting to 0217,920 due November 10, 1936,
on the
States

lorn of 1929 mace to' mb at Government by the United

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM EOR THE PRESS:

November 9, 1936.

RECEIPTS OE SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1 9 3 3 ) as amended
Week ended November 6, 1936:
Philadelphia.... .............................
$dn Eranci sco.................. ............. ..
Denver ......................... ............
Total for w e e k ended November 6, 1936...... . . ....
Total receipts through November 6, 1936...........

.

1,287,646.84 fine ounces!
694,542.84
»
______22.550.78
" $
2,004,740.46 »
«
110,908,481.18 »
I

SILVER TRANSEERREP TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended November 6, 1936:
Philadelphia............................. .. ., .
New York. ........ ..................... ...... . .
San Erancisco.................................
Denver.... ....... . ....... ................
New Orleans.............. ..................

127
96

fine ounces!
n N

Seattle................... .........................

Total for week ended November 6, 1936........... .
Total receipts through November 6, 1936...........

223
112,988,403.27

» ,f
» i

RECEIPTS OE GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OEEICES:
NeW

Week ended November 6, 1936:
I m p o r t s ___ Secondary
Philadelphia .......... . ... .... $
4,452.53 $158,745.49
New York...............
---- 18,045,200.00 101,800.00
San Eranci sco........ ....... ....
759,286.24
40,988,41
Denver.................
----57,331.01
16,332.97
New Orleans........ ........ ---- ------------22,834.25
Seattle ......... ,..... ... *.....
7.994.17
Total for week ended November 6, 1936..$18,866,269.78 $348,695.29

Domestic
$
1,668,80
295,200.00
1,321,722.27
.499,336.82
--------753.396.69
$2,871,324.58

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

November 10, 1936.

Y
MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There are attached two tabulations for immediate release
showing preliminary figures for imports of commodities under the
quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the
period from January 1 to October 31, 1936.
When the release has been mimeographed, please have 55
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

$

*•

Sawed Timber and Lumber Not Specially Provided For
'«—
Customs Districts
J

TOTAL IMPORTS

Douglas *
Fir
(Bd. Ft.)

: Mixed Fir * Total Fir
Western
* & Hemlock [ & Hemlock
Hemlock
(Bd. Ft.) | (Bd. Ft.) ; (Bd. Ft.)

75,279,260

29,334,770

299,251
967,271
8,918,798
6,095,308
178,330
11,513,212
50,386
12,676,508
91,484
14,172,118
11,010,176
580,394
19,697
274,995
656
483,334
7,947,342

103,735
1,964,373
2,701,587
942,265

34,553,811

139,167,841
55.7$

-

402,986
2,931,644
11,620,385
7,037,573
178,330
11,608,276
55,458
29,145,000
116,032
50,847,732
14,318,180
1,887,271
20,021
274,995
656
572,559
8,150,743

Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Indiana
Los Angeles
Maine & N. H.
Massachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
San Diego
San Francisco
Vermont
Washington

-

95,064
5,072
16,468,492
24,548
2,121,803
3,308,004
1,306,877
324
89,225
203,401

Mi.. !■■! I I

'>

$

**

1
1
-

34,553,811
-

-

-

• a

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
EOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Wednesday, November 11, 1936

Press Service
No. 8-82

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for imports I
of commodities under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for thJ
period January 1 to October 31, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear
to the totads allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:
IMPORTS OF DOUGLAS FIR AND WESTERN HEMLOCK UNDER THE QUOTA
PROVISIONS OF THE CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT

Customs Districts

Sawed Timber and Lumber not Specially Provided For
Mixed Fir
Douglas
: Western
Total Fi|
Fir
: Hemlock
& Hemlock
& Hemlocll
(Bd. Ft.)
:
(Bd. Ft.)
(Bd. Ft.)
(Bd.Ft.)l

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

75,275,260

29,334,770

299,251
967,271
8 ,918,798
6 ,095,308
178,330
11 ,513,212
50,386
12 ,676,508
91,484
14 ,172,118
11 ,010,176
580,394
19,697
274,995
656
483,334
7 947,342

103,735
1,964,373
2,701,587
942,265

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Connecticut
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Indiana
Los Angeles
Maine & N.H.
Massachusetts
Michigan
New York
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
Sail Diego
San Francisco
V ermont
Washington

—

95,064
5,072
16,468,492
24,548
2,121,803
3,308,004
1,306,877
324

89,225
203,401

34,553,811

«

—

—

~

—

«

—

—

—

~

—

—

—

~

-

—

—

—

—

—

—

34, 553, 811

—

_

—

_

—

_

-»

—

—

—
—

139,167,3m
55.7^1

402,S3
2,931,61
11,620,3a
7,037,51
178,33
11,608,21
55,43
29,145, o]
116,03
50,847,73
14,318,19
1,887,21
20,03
274,9Ì
63
572,5Ì
8,150,7i

-2-

IMPORTATIONS OP CATTLE, 8REAM AND SEED POTATOES
UNDER QUOTA PROVISIONS OF THE CANADIAN TRADE AGREEMENT

Customs Districts

Cattle 700
Pounds or
More
(Head)

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)

Cream
(Sal.)

White or
Irish Seed.
Potatoes
(Pounds)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

154,551
99.2$

5,283
26.4$

24,517
1.6$

26,735,729 (
59.4$

FROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Florida
Maine & N.H.
.Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada

- - - 28,672
3,547
22,804
261
_ — — —
77
562
— — —
7,093
43,167
1,541
1,328
3,133
22
594
289
— — « —
20,724
133,914

- « 1
- - 12
- - ~
~
956
- - 44
1
- - 35

12
— — —
—
101
— — —
m -26
— — —
---13

—

7,587
7,109
5,884
57
20,637

- - —
— — —
~ - -

FROM MEXICO
Arizong,
El Paso
San Antonio
San pi ago
Total from Mexico

NOTES
(a)

- - - - 684
2,646
- - 904
5,283

-- -

1
-- ~ **
— —
24,364
~ -- ~ 24,517

—
—
—
—
—

—
~
—
—
—

+*

r- {¡¡§••
52,500

92,650
180 I
2,285,111 1
2,593,920
1,780,374
186,510

18,413,529

580
1,244,375
86,000
26,735,729 1

**
—
—
—
—

*"*

—
— -* — *■ -* .

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been filled. J
Includes 1, 534,697 pounds of seed potatoes imported during December, 193q
at regular rate of duty.
ooOoo

,P
jl

rs

PORTATIONS vOF CATTLE 1_flggAM-ANff^Ss D POTATQE^
iR QUOTA PROVISIOJjgU^TE3E^ANADIiS^ffiIBF"AGHmEUT^:
J^urjj^’tdae Period January 1 to OctoberJg8ef**f$S6

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
- Per Cent of Quota
FROM CANADA
Alaska
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Florida
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Total from Canada

: Cattle 700
: Pounds or
:
More
: (Head)
'• 154,551
99.2$

i
:
:
:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
- ’5,283
26.4$

-

28,672
3,647
22,804
261
-

77
562
7,093
43,167
1,541
1,328
3,133
22
594
289

•

:
:

; White or
: Irish Seed
Cream
: Potatoes
(Gal.) : (Pounds)
24,517
1.6$

12

1
-

12

—

101

-

956
-

44
1

-

26

26,735,729 (a)
59.4$
m
m
52,500
«•

92,650
180
2,285,111
2,593,920

»

■»

-

1,780,374
186,510

13

_

—

35

1
18,413,529

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20,724

684
2,646
904

133,914

5,283

-

if

-

24,364

580
-

-

1,244,375
86,000

24,517

26,735,729

-

rj
■ci

S

TREASURY DEPARTMENT /Ci

V

T

'Washington

*&

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Tuesday, November 10, 1936*

Press Service
No, 8-^fT

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for imports of commodities under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to October
31, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to the totals
allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

FROM MEXICO

Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

7,587
7,109
5,884
57
20,637

NOTE - The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds each has been filled,
(a) - Includes 1,534,697 pounds of seed potatoes imported during December,
1935, at regular rate of duty.

- 6 -

The First National Bank of Defiance, Ohio, in receivership April 11, 1932, the
liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank.

Thi

receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the stockj
holders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivershiB

including offsets allowed, aggregated $65,365* which represented 61.78 per cent of
total liabilities*
The First National Bank of Napoleon, Ohio, in receivership April 11, 1934., the
liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank.

Th<

receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the stoci
holders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivership

including offsets allowed, aggregated $29,94-2, which represented 4.2.82 per cent of
total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Florala, Alabama, in receivership January 13, 1930;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $34-8,222, which represented 81.11 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured

depositors received dividends amounting to 66.97 per eent of their claims.
Dividend payments during October, 1936, by all receivers of insolvent national
banks to the creditors of all active receiverships aggregated $9,54.8,700.
Dividend payments to the creditors of all active receiverships since the bank­
ing holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $74-9,04.7,053.

-5 -

The First National Bank of Bxockton, Iowa, in receivership October 22, 1931*
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre- I
gated $59,579, which represented 45.06 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured de*

positors received dividends amounting to 34.61 per cent of their claims*
The Merchants National Bank of Defiance, Ohio, in receivership April 11, 1932 I
the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank,»
The receiver was appointed for the- purpose of collecting an assessment against the I
stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receiv-1

ership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $51,101, which represented 45.63 per 1
cent of total liabilities.
The Prairie Depot National Bank of Freeport, Ohio, in receivership September 5|
1933, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another!
bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment again|

the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during re­

ceivership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $22,307, which represented 76.67 I
per cent of total liabilities.
The First National Bank of Sevierville, Tennessee, in receivership August 13 > j
1932} disbursements, including offsets allowed,to depositors and other creditors ag-J
gregated $237,679, which represented 70,80 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured!

depositors received dividends amounting to 61,53 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Hazard, Kentucky, in receivership March 18, 1930,
the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank. I
The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the I
stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receiv-j

ership, including offsets allowed, aggregated $63,139, which represented 56,97 per
cent of total liabilities.

A

-

-

The First National Bank of Huron, South Dakota, in receivership March L4,

1924

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $1 ,124.,657, which represented 54-75 per cent of total liabilities*
depositors received dividends amounting to

24- 731

Unsecured

per cent of their claims*

The First National Bank of Ephrata, Washington, in receivership December 2, 19j
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $95,856, which represented 79*07 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured de

positors received dividends amounting to 4-5*74 per cent of their claims*
The First National Bank of Westfield, Illinois, in receivership November 28, l|
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregai
$209,121, which represented 82.16 per cent of total liabilities.
received dividends amounting to

81*26

Unsecured deposit!

per cent of their claims*

The Citizens National Bank of Kendallville, Indiana, in receivership March 16,

1932;

depositors and other creditors were paid

100

per cent principal and a portiod

of the interest, amounting to an additional dividend of

.86

per cent.

Total paymenj

to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $ 504-,201.
The First National Bank of Zillah, Washington, in receivership December 2, 19^
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $117,4.88, which represented 50.62 per cent of total liabilities.
positors received dividends amounting to

23

Unsecured de

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Alexis, Illinois, in receivership March 15, 1932,
liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed by another bank.

Tto|

receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assessment against the stoc
holders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivers)^

including offsets allowed, aggregated $61,585, which represented 100.84- per cent
total liabilities.

0

- 3 -

1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $515,147, which represented 58.59 per cent of total liabilities.

Unse- I

cured depositors received dividends amounting to 21.02 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Tranquillity, California, in receivership February I
27, 1930; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated $309,307, which represented 98.09 per cent of total liabilities,

u*

secured depositors received dividends amounting to 93 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Allen, Oklahoma, in receivership November 14-, 1932;|
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre- I
gated $78,74-1* which represented 72 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposij

tors received dividends amounting to 60.82 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Tyler, Minnesota, in receivership December 23, 19301
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregate
$4-27,956, which represented 78.58 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured deposi-|

tors received dividends amounting to 66.67 per cent of their claims.
The Peoples National Bank of Blairstown, New Jersey, in receivership October 2f
1931; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal and a portion!
of the interest, amounting to an additional dividend of 1.52 per cent.

Total paymei

to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $4-04-,279.
The First National Bank of Waldron, Arkansas, in receivership April 22, 1931? I
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre- I
gated $161,054-, which represented 78.77 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured dj

positors received dividends amounting to 71.8 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Eldora, Iowa, in receivership August 10, 1932; dis-1
bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated!
$359,516, which represented 85.24- per cent of total liabilities.
received dividends amounting to 81.8 per cent of their claims.

Unsecured deposit!

-

2

-

offsets allowed, aggregated $19 ,622, and the stockholders received nothing.
The Wilcox National Bank of Wilcox, Pennsylvania, in receivership October 27
1931; disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $227,521, which represented 93.29 per cent of total liabilities.
cured depositors received dividends amounting to

93

Unse­

per cent of their claims.

The National Bank of Sidney, Iowa, in receivership October 15, 1931; disburse-]
ments, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$185,976, which represented 79.69 per cent of total liabilities.
tors received dividends amounting to

7 3

Unsecured deposit

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Mora, Minnesota, in receivership September 14-, 193l|j
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $261,412, which represented 74*40 per cent of total liabilities.
depositors received dividends amounting to

64.3

Unsecured

per cent of their claims.

The First National Bank of Florence, Arizona, in receivership December 5* 1933j|
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggre­
gated $387,890, which represented 97.33 per cent of total liabilities.
depositors received dividends amounting to

90.52

Unsecured

per cent of their claims.

The Commercial National Bank of Essex, Iowa, in receivership May

5,

1931$ dis-]

bursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors aggregated
$188,866, which represented 95.33 per cent of total liabilities.
tors received dividends amounting to

94.12

Unsecured deposi-|

per cent of their claims.

The Citizens National Bank of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, in receivership DeceÇ
ber 29, 1932$ disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other ere
tors aggregated $400,569* which represented 78.33 per cent of total liabilities,
secured depositors received dividends amounting to

65.11

ÏÏ

per cent of their claims.

The First National iank in Mt. Sterling, Illinois, in receivership January 7*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
Press Service

FOR RELEASE. MORNING NEWSPAPERS, '

tion of the liquidation of 30 receiverships during October, 1936, making a total
of 5L4 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency since the so-called
banking holiday of March, 1933.

Total disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other creditors of these 514 institutions, exclusive of the 42
receiverships restored to solvency, aggregated $149,595,068, or an average return
of 76.29 per cent of total liabilities, while unsecured depositors received divi­
dends amounting to an average of 61.93 p©r cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Atwood, Illinois, in receivership December 5, 1933}
depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in
full amounting to an additional dividend of 8.521 per cent.

Total payments to

creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $148,229, and the stockholders re­
ceived $1,700, together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Bellevue, Iowa, in receivership June 25, 19345 de"
positors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal with interest in full
amounting to an additional dividend of 10.21 per cent.

Total payments to creditors,

including offsets allowed, aggregated $579,083, and the stockholders received $4,895
together with the assets remaining uncollected.
The Allenwood National Bank of Allenwood, Pennsylvania, in receivership Decem­
ber 22, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed
by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting an assess

ment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency in the assets sold.

The credits

bank, from dividends and other sources, received 100 per cent together with interes
in full amounting to 8.018 per cent.

Disbursements during receivership, including

V>

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OH RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING- THE MONTH OF
________
OCTOBER 1936
Continued:

Date of
Failure :

Total
Disbursemen ts
Including
Offsets Allowed:

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

First N ational Bank, Zillah, Washington
First National Bank, Alexis, Illinois
1/
First National Bank, Blockton, Iowa
Merchants National Bank, Defiance, Ohio *
Prairie Depot National Bank, Freeport, Ohio 1 /

12-2-31
3-15-32
10-22-51
4-01*32
9—5—33

$> 117,488*00
61,585*00
59,579*00
51,101*00
22,307.00

50.62
100.84
45*06
45.63
76.67

First
First
First
First
First

8-13-32
3-18-00
4-11-32
4-11-34
1-13-30

257,679.00
63,139.00
65,365.00
29,942.00
348,222.00

70.80
56.97
61.78
42.82
81*11

National
National
National
National
National

*

Bank, Sevierville, Tennessee
Bank of Hazard, Kentucky ■ 1 /
Bank, Defiance, Ohio
lif
f
Bank, Napoleon, Ohio
Bank, Florala, Alabama

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid

Unsecured
Claimants:
23
59.12277
34*61
9.945
42.631
61.53
32.15
20.93
24.217
66.97

F o m e r l y in Conservatorship*

1/ Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment covering deficiency in value of assets
sold, or to complete unfinished liquidation*

INSOLVENT NATIONAL :SANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED

OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING THE MONTH OF
OCTOBER 1956______________________

Date of
Failure:

105.85
107.04
108.00
95.29
79.69

9-14-51
12-5-55
5-5-51
12-29-52
1-7-50

261,412.00
587,890.00
188,866.00
400,569.00
515,147.00

74.40
97.55
95.55
78.55
58.59

64.5
90.52
94.12
65.11
21.02

2-27-50
11-14-52
12-25-50
10-29-51
4-22-51

509,507.00
78,741.00
427,956.00
404,279.00
161,054.00

98.09
72.0
78.58
101.18
78.77

95.
60.82
66.67
101.52
71.8

8-10-52
5-14-24
12-2-52
11-28-50
5-16t 52

559,516.00
1,124,657.00
95,856.00
209,121.00
504,201.00

85.24
54.75
79.07
82.16
100.67

81.8
24.751
45.74
81.26
100.86

12-5-55
6-25-54
12-22-52
10-27-51
10-15-51

First National Bank, Mora, Minn.
First National Bank, Florence, Ariz. *
Commercial National Bank, Essex, la.
Citizens National Bank, Glenwood Springs,Colo.
First Nat’l Bank in Mt. Sterling, 111.
First Nat‘1 Bank, Tranquility, Calif.
First National Bank, Allen, Okla.
First National Bank, Tyler, Minn.
Peoples Natfl Bank, Blairstown, N. J.
First National Bank, Waldron, Ark.
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,

Eldora, Iowa
Huron, S. D.
Ephrata, Wash.
Westfield, 111.
Kendallville, Ind.

Per Cent
Dividends
Paid
Unsecured
Claimants;

148,229.00
579,085.00
19,622.00
227,521.00
185,976.00

First National Bank, Atwood, 111* *
First National Bank, Bellevue, la* *
Allenwood Nat’l Bank, Allenwood, Pa. 1/
Wilcox National Bank, Wilcox, Pa*
National Bank of Sidney, Iowa

First National
First National
First National
First National
Citizens Nat*l

Total
Disbursements
Including
Offsets Allowed:

Per Cent
Total
Returns
to All
Creditors:

#

108.521
110.21
108.018
95.
75.8

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Monday. November 16. 1936______
11/12/36.

Press Service
8-83

J. F. T. O ’Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, today announced
the completion of the liquidation of 30 receiverships during October,1936,
making a total of 514 receiverships finally closed or restored to solvency
since the so-called hanking h o liday’of March, 1933.

Total disbursements,

including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors of these 514
institutions, exclusive of the 42 receiverships restored to solvency, ag­
gregated $149,595,068, or an average return of 76.29 per cent of total
liabilities, while unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to
an average of 61,93 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Atwood, Illinois, in receivership
December 5, 1933; depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent
principal with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of
8.521 per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed,

aggregated $148,229, and the stockholders received $1,700, together with
the assets remaining uncollected.
The First National Bank of Bellevue, Iowa, in receivership June
25, 1934;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent principal

with interest in full amounting to an additional dividend of 10.21 per cent
Total payments to creditors, including offsets allowed, aggregated $579,083
and the stockholders received $4,895, together with the assets remaining
uncollected.

2

The Allenwood National Bank of Allenv/ood, Pennsylvania, in receiver­
ship December 22, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having thereto­
fore been assumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the

purpose of collecting an assessment against the stockholders to cover a
deficiency in the assets sold.

The creditor bank, from dividends and other

sources, received 100 per cent together with interest in full amounting to
8.018 per cent.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed,

aggregated $19,622, and the stockholders received nothing.
The Wilcox National Bank of Wilcox, Pennsylvania, in receivership
October 27, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $227,521, which represented 93.29 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

S3 per cent of their claims.
The National Bank of Sidney, Iowa, in receivership October 15, 1931;
disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other creditors
aggregated $185,976, which represented 79.69 per cent of total liabilities.
Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 73.8 per cent of their
claims.
The First National B ank of M 0ra, Minnesota, in receivership September
14, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and other

creditors aggregated $261,412, which represented 74,40 per cent of total
liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to 64.3 per

cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Florence, Arizona, in receivership .
December 5, 1933;

disbursements, including offsets allowed;

to depositors

3

and other creditors aggregated $387,890, which represented 97.33 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 90.52 per cent of their claims.
The Commercial National Bank of Essex, Iowa, in receivership May
5, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and

other creditors aggregated $188,866, which represented 95.33 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

94,12 per cent of their claims.
The Citizens National 3 ank of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, in re­
ceivership December 29, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors and other'creditors aggregated $400,569, which represented
78,33 per cent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received divi­

dends amounting to 65,11 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bahk in Mt. Sterling, Illinois, in receivership
January 7,1930;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and (other creditors aggregated $515,147,
of tttal liabilities.
to

which represented 58.59 per cent

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

21.02 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Tranquillity, California, in receiver­

ship February 27, 1930;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to de­

positors and other creditors aggregated $309,307, which represented 98.09
per «ent of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends

amounting to 93 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Allen, Oklahoma, in receivership
November 14, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

4

and other creditors aggregated $78,741, which represented 72 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

60.82 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Tyler, Minnesota, in receivership
December 23, 1930;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $427,956, which represented 78.58 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 66.67 per cent of their claims.
The Peoples National Bank of Blairstown,.New Jersey, in receiver­
ship October 29, 1931;

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per

cent principal and a portion of the interest, amounting to an additional
dividend of 1.52 per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $404,279*
The First National Bank of Waldron, Arkansas, in receivership
April 22,

1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors
H

and other creditors aggregated $161,054, which represented 78.77 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 71.8 per cent of their claims.
The First National Bank of Eldora, Iowa, in receivership August
10, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and

other creditors aggregated $359,516, which represented 85.24 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

81.8 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Huron, South Dakota, in receivership
March 14, 1924;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $1,124,657, which represented 54.75 per of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

5

24.731 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Ephrata, Washington, in receivership
December 2, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $95,856, which represented 79.07 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 45.74 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Westfield, Illinois, in receivership
November 28, 1930;

disbursements, including offsets allowed,

to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $209,121, which represented 82.16 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 81.26 per cent of their claims.
The Citizens National B ank of Kendallville,
ship March 16, 1932;

Indiana, in receiver­

depositors and other creditors were paid 100 per cent

principal and a portion of the interest, amounting to an additional divi­
dend of .86 per cent.

Total payments to creditors, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $504,201.
The First National Bank of Zillah, Washington, in receivership
December 2, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $117,488, which represented 50.62 per cent
of total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting

to 23 per cent of their claims.
The First National B ank of Alexis, Illinois, in receivership March
15, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been assumed
by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of collecting

an assessment against the stockholders to

cover a deficiency in tne assets

- 6

sola.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets allowed, ag­

gregated $61,585, which represented 100.84 per cent of total liabilities.
The First national Bank of Blockton, Iowa, in receivership October
22, 1931;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors and

other creditors aggregated $59,579, which represented 45.06 per cent of
total liabilities.

Unsecured depositors received dividends amounting to

34.61 per cent of their claims.
The Merchants National B&hfe of Defiance, Ohio, in receivership
April 11, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore
been assumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose

of collecting an assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency
in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $51,101, which represented 45.63 per cent of total
liabilities.
The Prairie Depot National Bank of Freeport, Ohio, in receivership
September 5, 1933, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore
been assumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose

of collecting an assessment against the stockholders to
in the assets sold.

cover a deficiency

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $22,307, which represented 76.67 per cent of total
liabilities.
The First National Bank of Sevierville, Tennessee, in receivership
August 13, 1932;

disbursements, including offsets allowed, to depositors

and other creditors aggregated $237,679, which represented 70.80 per cent
of total liabilities.

j j
_4 4.r\-r*c< r*cx*vsd. ¿Lividends snountin^
Unsecured depositors received

to 61.53 per cent of their claims.

7

The First National Bank of Hazard, Kentucky, in receivership March
18, 1930, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been as­
sumed by another bank.

The receiver' was appointed for the purpose of

collecting an assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency
in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $63,139, which represented 56.97 per cent of total
liabilities.
The First National Bank of Defiance, Ohio, in receivership April
11, 1932, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been as­
sumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of

collecting an assessment against the stockholders to cover a deficiency
in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed; aggregated.$65,365, which represented 61.78 per cent of total
liabilities.
The First National B,ahk of Napoleon, Ohio,, in- receivership' April-,
11, 1934, the liabilities of the institution having theretofore been asr
sumed by another bank.

The receiver was appointed for the purpose of

collecting an assessment against the stockholders to cover .a deficiency
in the assets sold.

Disbursements during receivership, including offsets

allowed, aggregated $29,942, which represented 42.82 per cent of total
liabilities.
The Fir st -National Brgik of Florala, Alabama, ■in receiver snip
January 13, 1930;

disbursements, .including,. off sets allowed,

to depositors

and other, creditors aggregated. $348,,222, which represented 81.11 per-cent
of- total liabilities.,.-Unsecured depositors received .dividends amounting

~

8

-

to 66.97 per cent of their clains.
Dividend paynents during October, 1936, by all receivers of in­
solvent national banks to the creditors of all active receiversnips
aggregated $9,548,700.
Dividend paynents to the creditors of all active receiverships
since the banking holiday of March, 1933, aggregated $749,047,053.

IN SO L V EN T

N A T IO N A L BANKS

OR R E S T O R E D
_________

TO

L IQ U ID A T E D

SOLVENCY
OCTOBER

D URING

AND F IN A L L Y
THE

MONTH

CLOSED

OF

1 9 3 6 _____________________________________

Per

of

F a ilu r e :

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

A tw ood ,

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

B e lle v u e ,

A lle n w o o d
W ilc o x

111.

N a t’l

Bank,

A lle n w o o d ,

N a tio n a l

Bank,

W ilc o x ,

N a tio n a l

Bank

o f

S id n e y ,

Bank,

M ora,

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

F lo r e n c e ,

C itiz e n s

N a tio n a l

N a tio n a l

F ir st

N a t *1

Bank

F ir st

N a t 11

Bank,

F ir s t

N a tio n a l
N a tio n a l

P e o p le s

N a t 11

Bank,

Bank,
in

M t.

Bank,
Bank,

R etu rn s

P a id

In c lu d in g

to

U n secu red

O ffse ts

C r e d ito r s:

G len w o o d

A lle n ,
T y le r ,

C a lif.

M in n .

B la ir sto w n ,
W a ld ro n ,

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

n ld o r a ,

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

H uron*

F ir s t

N a tio n a l

Bank,

E p h reta,

N a t’l

-.1 1 .

O ld .a .

Bank,

N a tio n a l

0

S p r in g s,

S te r lin g ,

N a tio n a l

C itiz e n s

i a

N.

J .

W a sh ,,

Bunn,

W e stx ie ld ,

K e n d a llv ille ,

22 - 3 I

-3 2
3 - 1 U - 2U
12 - 2-32

D.

Bank,

2 3-30

S -lO

Iow a
S.

lU

1 2 -

1 0 -2 9 -3 1

111.
In d .

1 1 -2 3 -3 0

3 - 16 -3 2

6U .3

3 0 9 ,3 0 7 .0 0

9S .09

93.
60.32
66.67
101.52
71.3

-3 2

1 1 -

93.
73.3

5 1 5 ,lU 7 .0 0

U oo,

1 -7 -3 0

10s .521
110 .21
10s.01s

97.33
95.33
7 S .j>3
53.59

1 3 5 .3 6 6 .0 0

2 -2 7 -3 0

103.00
93.29
79.69

C l a i m a n t sj.

90.52
9^.12

3 3 7 .3 9 0 .0 0

1 2 -2 9 -3 2

U -

A rk.

5 7 9 » 0 3 3 .0 0

107.OU

26 l . H l 2.00

1 H- 3 1

5 -5 -3 1
C o lo .

1 0 5 .3 5

1 3 5 ,9 7 6 .0 0

1 2 -5 -3 3

A r iz .

A ll

lU S ,2 2 9 .0 0

2 2 7 ,5 2 1 .0 0

10 - 1 5 - 3 1
S -

A llo w e d

1 9 , 622.00

1 2 22-32

J

1 0 -2 7 -3 1

n ssex ,

F ir s t

F ir s t

1

M in n .

T r a n q u illity ,

Bank,

P a.

6 -2 5 -3 ^
-

Iow a

N a tio n a l

C o m m e r c ia l

*

P a.

F ir s t

F ir s t

la ,

C ent

D i sh u r s em ent s

$

1 2 -5 -3 3

*

Pen

D iv id e n d s

T o ta l

L ate

C ent

T o ta l

569.00

7 3 ,7 ^ -1 .0 0
H

27, 9o*e M

H o H ,2 7 9 . 0 0
,

7 2 .0

73.53

10 1 .IS

1 6 1 05^.00

73.77

35 9 . 516 .0 0

35.2^
5^.75
79.07
3?. 16

1 ,1 2 ^ ,6 5 7 .0 0

9 5 , 356.00
209 . 12 1.0 0
50 U , 2 0 1.0 0

100.67

65.11

21.02

Sl.S

2U.731
U5.7^
SI. 26

100.36

INSOLVENT NATIONAL BANKS LIQUIDATED AND FINALLY CLOSED
OR RESTORED TO SOLVENCY DURING- THE MONTH OF
_____________________ OCTOBER 1936_______________________
Continued:

First N a t i o n a l Bank, Zillah, W a s h i n g t o n
First N a t i o n a l Bank, Alexis, Illinois
1/
First N a t i o n a l Bank, Blockton, Iowa
M e r c h a n t s N a t i o n a l Bank, Defiance, Ohio
*
P r a i r i e Depot Nat i o n a l Bank, Freeport, Ohio
First
First
First
First
First

National
National
National
National
National

Bank, Sevierville, Tennessee
Bank
Bank,
Bank,
Bank,

of Hazard, K e n t u c k y
Defiance, Ohio
Napoleon, Ohio
Florala, A l a b a m a

if
if

J

1

l/

Date of
Failure:

Total
Di sbur sements
Iric L a d i n g
Of f s e t s Allowed:

12-2-31

$

117,^83.00

P e r Cent
Total
Re turns
to A l l
Creditors :

50.62
10 0 .

8k

P e r Cent
Dividends
paid
Unsecured
Claimants:

23.
59.12277

3-15-32

61,585.00

10- 22-31
U-ll -32

5 1 ,101.00

1*5.63

9-5-33

22,307.00

76.67

34.61
9.945
'
42.631

237,679.00
63,139.00
65,365.00
29,9^ 2.00
3^8,222.00

70.30
56.97
61.73
*42.82
81.11

32.15
20.93
24.217

3-13-32
3- 18-30
H- 11-32
H- 1 1 - 3H
1 - 13-30

59.579.00

*+5 «06

61.53

66.97

* Formerly in Conservatorship,
l/ Receiver appointed to levy and collect stock assessment covering deficiency in value of assets
sold, or to complete unfinished liquidation.

Sta
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

November 12, 1936.
MR, FUSSELL
Room 289 - Treasury Department

FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for imports of commodities coming into the
United States from the Philippine Islands, under the quota pro­
visions of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of
1935, for the period January 1 to October 31, 1936.
When this tabulation has been mimeographed, will you kindly
have 20 copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Bldg.?

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for imports of commodities coming into the United States
from the Philippine Islands, under the quota provisions of the
Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of 1935, for the
period January 1 to October 31, 1936, and the percentages that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quotas, as follows:

Customs Districts

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawai i
Los Angeles
Maine & N. H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St, Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin

:
:
:

:_________ S U G;A R S
Coconut Oil i
Refined
: Unrefined
(Pounds)
:
(Pounds)
:
(Pounds)
274,474,591
61.3% •

-

101,077,710
90.2%

1,692,360,242
94.4%

«

11,922,506
14,818,711
11,617

-

17,610,020
-

3,250,500
28,049,950
-

46,647,940
136,608,859
-

8,610,207
11,522
-

:
:

-

20,389,357
-

499,329
—
-

3,744,293
i
26,718,172
-

_
—

81,623,296
23,616,578
-

296,315,680
493,120,377
-

128,300
640,146,643

»

_

-

•»

•
-

-

33,681,843

7,133,357

3,750
-

42,593,202

* Quota year commenced May 1.

-

-

_

130,618,452
_

38,082
-

Cordage*!
(Pounds )|
3,552,981
59.2%

270,435
43,158

J
454,961
330,041
4,539

J
30,496
6,251
36,294
1,016,233
2,048
109,964
11,37|
124,618
13,613
1,831
128,879
716,88(1
17,679
145,690j
87,9971

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Thursday, November 12, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8~&4

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for imports
of commodities coming into the United States from the Philippine Islands, under
the quota provisions of the Philippine Independence Act and the Cordage Act of
1935, for the p-eriod January 1 to October 31, 1936, and the percentages that such
imports bear to the totals allowable under the quotas, as follows?
Coconut
Cil
(Pounds)
TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota
CUSTOMS DISTRICTS
Chicago
Galveston
Georgia
Hawaii
Los Angeles
Maine & N.H.
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Orleans
New Y0rk
Ohio
Oregon
Philadelphia
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
St. Lawrence
St. Louis
San Francisco
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
*

:.
S U & A R S
:
: Refined
Unrefined
:Cordage*
? (Pounds)
_________(Pounds)____ :(Pounds)

274,474,591
101,077,710
1,692,360,242 3,552,981
______ 61.3$____________90.2^__________ 94,4 j
o_______ 59.2^

------------------------------- ~ --- - 17,610,020
_____ '----3,250,500
28,049,950
~ ~ - ----46,647,940
136,608,859

--------- -------- -------------- - - - - 20,389,357
------- ---499,329
- *--------„ _ _ ~
„
----------3,744,293

----------8,610,207
11,522
_ ^
_

26,718,172
--------------- - - - ----- -- -

--- - - - 33,681,843
----------3,750
** ■.** m
**

_ _ _ _ _ _
7,133,357
„
------42,593,202 -

Quota year commenced May 1.
ooOoo

------- - --11,922,506
14,818,711
11,617
------------------------81,623,296
23,616,578
----- ------ 298,315,680
493,120,377
.*■ » '
m>.«•* -*m
128,300
640,146,643
------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 130,618,452
~ ~ ~ ------38,082
- - - - - - -

270,435
43,158
454,961
330,048
4,530
30,496
6,251
36,294
1,016,233
2,048
109,964
11,371
124,618
13,615
1,837
128,876
716,880
17,679
145,690
87,997

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
O F FIC E O F THE SECRETA RY

W A S H IN G T O N

November 9, 1936*
SrJ

TO MR. GASTON:

During the month of October, 1936, the following market
transactions took place in Government securities for investment
accounts:

Tbtal purchases ............. #27,021,200
Total sales

* * * * . .

Net purchases:

* ,

#27,021,200

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Monday, November 16, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-85

Net market purchases of Government securities for Treasury investment
accounts for the calendar month of October, 1936, amounted to $27,021,200,
Secretary Morgenthau announced today.
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
L-.:!C-,UI\TDUM EOR THE PRESS'
November 16, 1936.
- % - Ij?T3 OF SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY €EEICES?
'Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended November 13, 1936.*
Philadelphia. .4 ................
San Eranci sco.................
Denver. ...■. .L ..........
Total for week ended November 13, 1936.............
Total receipts through November 13, 1936......

1,065,459.64 fine ounces
510,558.13
» »»
8.303.09
«» r
t'
1,584,320.86
» f
112,492,802 „04
» f

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED S T A T E S ;
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended November 13, 1936:
Philadelphia .......... ..... .
New York........ ............ .
San Eranci s c o ..... ...........
Denver....................
New Orleans ................
Seattle.......................
Total for week ended November 13, 1936 ....... .
Total receipts through November 13, 1936..____ ___

755.00 fine ounces

755.00 fine ounces
112,989,158.27 «
»

RECEIPTS OE GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OEEICES:
New
Week ended November 13, 1936:
___ Imports
Secondary
Domestic
Philadelphia................
$
22,884.61 $102,981.29 $*
531.09
New York.....
27,238,900.00 134,600.00
230,600.00
San Eranci sco.... .........
1,184,245.46
29,977.57 1,616,078.69
Denver ........ ...................
*
48,436*90
20,369.41
797,018.87
New Orleans ......... .
278.62
17,565.06
273.22
Seattle .............. ............
-------* ~ r. ... 1,374.13
854.390.76
Total ior week ended November 13.,.
$28,494,745.59 $306,867.46 $3,498,892-.63
ooOoo

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NIWSPAPffiS,

Press Service

Tuesday* ffavember 17. I°v9f .11/16/36

Sf - f /
*
*

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced
la s t evening that the tenders for 150,000,000, or thereabouts,j
o f 273-day Treasury b i l l s , dated November 18, 1936, and matur­
ing August 18, 1937, which were offered on November 13, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on November 16.

The total amount applied for was §136,273,000,
of which 150,083,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids ranged

in price from 99.939, equivalent to a rate of about 0.080
percent per annum, to 99.919, equivalent to a rate of about
0.107 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.

Only

part of the amount bid for at the la tte r price was accepted.
The average price of Treasury b i ll s to be issued is 99.923
and the average rate is about 0 .10 1 percent per annum on a
bank discount basis*

jT)

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Press Service
No. 8A86

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday, November 17, 1936,_____
11-16-36.

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the
tenders for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury hills, dated November
18, 1936, and maturing August 18, 1937* which were.offered on November 13, were
opened at the Federal Reserve banks on November 16,
The total amount applied for was $136,273,000, of which $50,083,000 was
accepted.

The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.939, equivalent to a rate

of about 0.080 percent per annum, to 99.919,,equivalent to a rate of about 0.107
percent per annum* on a bank discount basis.
at the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for

The average price of Treasury bills to be

issued is 99.923 and the average rate is about 0.101 percent per annum on a
bank discount basis.
ooOoo

-

on exactly the

mm

4 *

terms.

The merit of this plan, in

my

opinion, is that youth and experience have had equal oppor­
tunities#
'X hope for the exhibit the fullest measure of success#

Franklin D. Roosevelt.*

Through the courtesy of the Director and Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery
of Art, we are enabled to hold this exhibition which will last through
December 15th#

I want to thaal^the artists who have done this work, and to recommend this
exhibition to you#
much as I have#

I hope you will all come and see it and enjoy it as

-

5

of and feeling for works of grace and beauty which is an essential part
of a National culture*

It means also that this age will be able to leave

behind it, along with the achievements of the machine, a record of our art
sense and our art progress,
I now have the privilege of reading to you a statement by the President*
He says*
*1 have learned with sincere interest of plans to hold,
at the Corcoran Gallery of Art, an exhibit of painting and
sculpture done under the Treasury Department Art Projects.
,fIt is clear that the extensive building of new court
houses, post offices and other Federal buildings that come
within the scope of the Treasury Department*s activities
brings with it an important opportunity for the artists of
America to make our public buildings more beautiful with
painting and sculpture.

The decoration of these buildings

will make it possible to bring those two noble arts back to
a close and fruitful relationship with architecture, and,
at the same time, to give to our artists a chance to practice
their professions under conditions fostering this revived
relationship.
ii
I a® glad to learn that in the preliminary competitions
no attempt was made to seek out for special favor, artists of
established name, but that the competitions were open to tfta
unknown, to the ybung, and to established and famous artists,

•

z

-

has given his best without stint and without reservation.
I have the honor to introduce The Honorable The Seeretaiy of the Treasury,
Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Jr*
Secretary Morgenthaui
It gives

m

great personal pleasure to be able to open this exhibition*

I am proud of this showing of the work of American artists In the decora­
tion of United States Government buildings.

To you, Mr. Bruce, should go,

I think, the major credit for what the Treasury Department has been able
to accomplish for native American art in the last three years.
The Treasury Department Art Program is, a part of the work of, the Procurement

Jf VJL4J/JUL6

,
X t ^ section of raint-

Division, nfrfrrh d w tipin

ings add Sculpture supervises the suitable decoration e f theta-buildIngs
with murals and carvings.

We have here a representative selection of art

works designed for this use.

It is an impressive example not only of our

resources in art ability, but also of the co-operation of architects,
painters and sculptors to make this work really expressive of American genius
and the American spirit.
It seems to me that there is a double gain in the artistic embellishment of
our public buildings with paintings and sculpture*

It provides a new oppor­

tunity and a new stimulus for artists by permitting them to work on subjects
of the broadest cultural interest with the knowledge that if their work is
soundly conceived and well executed it will fora a part of a permanent
hibition»ffi»i7l Am tfaw eym.pmkfcfcCK

ex-

for the public it means a better

opportunity to enjoy modern works of art and thus to develop that knowledge

MATERIAL FOIi A RJL&XO TALK BY THE HONORABLE THE
SECRETARE OF THE TREASURE, HENRY MGRGRNTHAU, JR , OH THE
OCCASION OF THE OPENING OF THE TREASURE BEFARTMMf ART
PROGRAM *S EXHIBITION AT THE CORCORAN GALLERY ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 17th.

Radio Announcer*
During the next few minutes we will have the privilege of Leering from
the Secretary of the Treasury, Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Jr., who will pre­
sent a message from the President of the United States.

First, let

m

present Mr. Edward Bruce, Chief of the Section of Painting and Sculpture
of the Treasury Department.
Mr. Brucei
Mr. Secretary, it is a signal honor to Invite you to open this exhibition
which represents most of the work done during the last two years under
the far-flung program for the embellishment of public buildings, inaugurated
by you.
Our effort has been to follow your instructions and to secure for the
Government the best art which this countxy could produce.

There is, un­

fortunately, no standard, or yardstick, by which the quality of a work or
art can be accurately measured.

We have maintained, however, a high

technical and professional standard.

The work exhibited gives -a fair

cross section of the work accomplished.

Your program is, in

opinion,

the most far reaching, liberal and impartial plan which the artists of
this, or any, country have ever been privileged -to engage in.
challenge to the American artist.

It is a

I hop© you will agree with me that he

9

t^ ß - * * * -

,

f

ç < y j~

'

'

‘

^ 7

w

æ u

< /

^

[ ^ C i ^ u ^ f

o^jr

ß^fu^r'

ißzt

tjS

T

^

j

^

x

T t ^ ^ ^ y í ^ - fäjL

C ^ e - ^ - ^ - ^ Y ’

^yiA^ui^0^€<)

¿

î m

7

'¡U.csxjXfß

(JM 'tfa-

( U

œu^(

^ J L

C^t^.

o

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE UPON DELIVERY,
4:45 P.M, Eastern Standard Time
Tuesday, November 17, 1936.

Press Service
No. 8-87

Following is the text of the remarks of Edward Bruce, Consulting Art Expert
of the Treasury Department, and of Secretary Morgenthau on the occasion of the
opening of an exhibit of murals and sculpture for public "buildings, at the
Corcoran Art Gallery in Washington, on Tuesday, November 17, 1936,
Mr. Bruce:
Mr. Secretary, it is a signal honor to invite you to open this exhibition
which represents most of the work done during the last two years under the
far-flung program for the embellishment of public buildings, inaugurated
^y you.
Our effort has been to follow your instructions and to secure for the
Government the best art which this country could produce.

There is, un­

fortunately, no standard, or yardstick, by which the quality of a work
or art can be accurately measured.

.We have maintained, however, a high

technical and professional standard.

The work exhibited gives a fair

cross section of the work accomplished.

Your program is, in my opinion,

the most far reaching, liberal and impartial plan which the artists of
this, or any, country have ever "been privileged to engage in.
challenge to the American artist,..

It is a

I hope you will agree with me that he

has given his best without stint and without reservation.
I have the honor to introduce the Honorable, The Secretary of the Treasury,
Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Jr.
Secretary Morgenthau:
It gives me great personal pleasure to be able to open this exhibition.

I

am proud of this showing of the work of American artists in the decoration cf

United States Government 'buildings.

To you, Mr. Bruce, should go» I think,

the major credit for what the Treasury Department has "been able to accomplish
for native American art in the last three years.
The Treasury Department Art Program is a part of the work of the Procurement
Division, under the able direction of AdmirQl Peoples.

Its section of Paint­

ings and Sculpture supervises the suitable decoration of Federal buildings
with murals and carvings.

We have here a representative selection of art

works designed for this use.

It is an impressive example not only of our

resources in art ability, but also of the cooperation of architects, painters
and sculptors to make this work really expressive of American genius and the
American spirit.
It seems to me that there is a double gain in the artistic embellishment of
our public buildings with paintings and sculpture.

It provides a new oppor­

tunity and a new stimulus for artists by permitting them to work on subjects
of the broadest cultural interest with the knowledge that if their work is
soundly conceived and well executed it will form a part of a permanent
exhibition.

For the public it means a better opportunity to enjoy modern

works of- art and thus to develop that knowledge of and feeling for works of
grace and beauty which is an essential part of a National culture.

It means

also that this age will be able to leave behind it, along with the achievement
of the machine, a record of our art sense and our art progress.
I now have the privilege of reading to you a statement by the President.
He says:
1*1 have learned with sincere interest of plans to hold, at the
Corcoran Gallery of Art, an exhibit of painting and sculpture done under
the Treasury Department Art Projects,
»»It is clear that the extensive building of new court houses, post
offices and other Federal buildings that come within the scope of the

Treasury Departments activities "brings with it an important
opportunity for the artists of America to make our public buildings
more beautiful with painting and sculpture.

The decoration of these

buildings will make it possible to bring those two noble arts back
to a close and fruitful relationship with architecture, and, at the
same time, to give to our artists a chance to practice their professions
undei* conditions fostering this revived relationship.
T,I am glad to learn that in the preliminary competitions no
attempt was made to seek out for special favor, artists of established
name, but that the competitions were open to the unknown, to the young,
and to established and famous artists, on exactly the same terms.

The

merit of this plan, in my opinion, is that youth and experience have
had equal opportunities*
HI hope for the exhibit the fullest measure of success*
Franklin D. Roosevelt-.*1"

Through the courtesy of the Director and Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery
of Art., we are enabled to hold this exhibition which will last through
December 13th.
X want to thank most heartily the artists who have done this work, and to
recommend this exhibition to you#

X hope you will all cone and seeit and

enjoy it as much as I have,*

00O 00

V

Customs District

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Quota

: Cattle 700
:
Pounds
: Or More
:
(Head)
155,366
99,7$

: -Dairy Cows
: 700 Pounds
:
Or More
:
(Head)
5,382
26.9%

FROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St. Lawrence
Vermont
Washington

7,093
43,309
1,541
1,328
3,133
22
594
289
20,825

684
2,708
927

Total from Canada

134,247

5,382

7,889
7,109
6,064
57

-

FROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

NOTE:

28,716
3,656
22,834
261
84
562
-

1
15
-

962
-

49
1
-

35
-

-

21,119

The quota on cattle weighing less than 175 pounds
each has been filled.

-

-

— Y

Xi

Th© Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary
figures for the imports of cattle under the quota provisions of
the Canadian Trade Agreement, for the period January 1 to
November 7, 1936, and the percentage that such imports bear to
the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as follows:

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Sta

November 17, 1936.

TO MR. FUSSELL
(Room 289 - Treasury Department)
FROM MR. FREEMAN:
There is attached a tabulation for immediate release showing
preliminary figures for the imports of cattle under the quota pro­
visions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, during the period from
January 1 to November 7, 1936.
When the tabulation has been mimeographed t please have 55
copies forwarded to me at Room 415, Washington Building.

J

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
Press Service
fei

0
•
cx>
1
CD
CO

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
Tuesday, November 17, 1936.-

The Commissioner of Customs today announced preliminary figures for the
imports of cattle under the quota provisions of the Canadian Trade Agreement, for
the period January 1 to November 7, 1936, and the percentage that such imports
bear to the totals allowable under the quota provisions, as :follows:

Custons District

Cattle 700
Pounds
Or More
(Head)

TOTAL IMPORTS
Per Cent of Q,uota

155,366
99.7$

PROM CANADA
Buffalo
Chicago
Dakota
Duluth & Superior
Maine & New Hampshire
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana & Idaho
New York
Oregon
Philadelphia
St, Lawrence
Vermont
Washington
Total from Canada
PROM MEXICO
Arizona
El Paso
San Antonio
San Diego
Total from Mexico

NOTE:

Dairy Cows
700 Pounds
Or More
(Head)
5,382
26.9$

1

28,716
3,656
22,834
261
84
562
7,093
43,309
1,541
1,328
3,133
22
594
289
20,825
134,247

7,889
7,109
6,064
57
21,119

15
962
49 :
1
— ——
35
— — —
- - — — —
684
2,708
927
5,382

——
— — —
— •" **
mrn

m*

mm

The quota on cattle 7/eighing less than 175 pounds each has “been filled.

00O 00

~P C z

%

Î3>

of thu Sarootio Bureau ^ t & Æ h © Custom A^enoy Servio© &ad other
A

Treasury

m n t in

*

“
m

w

H

è

à

i

m

*

% u .

K

<&fcairdi*§ s » # effeotiv© siarootloe enforee-

the Bow ttijjfc area*

<w«—©00—1
*»•

YHR&SMY

^
A

ViPWTsŒm

Washington

0..jij,f

F o è ’SMMhSM

Pro #» Service

3 oorotary Morgenthau announced today that Garland William#
ttf0>*m*mmmKn./h^F>k^,^n>\ 01
il&uT¿$ ^ 7
had boon transferred!
from the
ftjririnia^r-ytrrn
Tiigjrrl ire
t ^ | ^ w s w » b%
tho ettatjfriin
(haat ^ a-Ageaey
’U"*”* Oj *Ÿ^4„ C<Ar^-/
C>Qrkwa Qh/*1
£“f jfâit&'Ù,- /-&f€±i
/^to bo e m
PI stri et Supervisor of the Barcotio Bureau in How Text:
A

City.

d S a U B l o

roplaeW'^raak L, Xgoe, who ha# boon transferred

to field duty outside of low York*
In addition tho following changes in Bareotic Bureau personnel
in Hew York City have boon made by direction of tho Secretary*
Marootic Agent# San H. Menkes, Martin A« Meyer and Salvatore
Pacetta have been removed from tho service,
Harcotio Agent# Colcsa&n P. Manning, Robert 1« Primrose, Martin
Bain, l&aasuel Elhaum, Charles Be Stefano, Ferey Clark end Joseph h*
Barde# have been transferred f r m

the Hew York Division to field duty

elsewhere.
Action in the shove cases is the result of an investigation of
conditions of narcotic enforcement in the low York area, by direction
of the Secretary and
d^tfJrrwk^

i»

,d

vf>

Yhe in vesti gabion m s conducted
by the Intelligence Unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue la cooperation

pX**,t
with the eoi»tosasp §sg raxJiarrtoM,

Ellison C* Palmer, Special Agent in

Charge of the Atlanta Division of the Intelligence Unit of the Bureau
of Internal Revenue, has been in direct ©barge ©f the investigation,
Mr. Palmer will remain in Hew York temporarily to promote ©©ordination

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
EQR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, November 17, 1936.

Press Service
8-89

Secretary Morgenthau announced today that Garland Williams had
"been transferred from the position of Superintendent of the Southwestern
Division of the Customs Border Patrol at El Paso, Texas, to "be District
Supervisor of the Narcotic Bureau in New York City, replacing Frank

Igoe,

who has "been transferred to field duty outside of New York*
In addition the following changes in Narcotic Bureau personnel in
New York City have "been made "by direction of the Secretaryr
Narcotic Agents Sam H. Menkes, Martin A. Meyer and Salvatore
Pacetta have "been removed from the service.
Narcotic Agents Coleman P » Manning, Robert E. Primrose, Martin
Hain, Emanuel Elbaum, Charles De Stefano, Percy Clark and Joseph L. Bardes
have been transferred from the New York Division to field duty elsewhere.
Action in the above cases is the result of an investigation of
conditions of narcotic enforcement in the New York area, by direction of
the Secretary and in cooperation with United States Attorney Lamar Hardy
of the Southern Judicial District of New York.

The investigation was con­

ducted by the Intelligence Unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue in cooper­
ation with Mr. Hardy and his assistants.

Ellison C. Palmer, Special Agent

in Charge of the Atlanta Division of the Intelligence Unit of the Bureau of
.Internal Revenue, has been in direct charge of the investigation. Mr. Palmer
will remain in New York temporarily to promote coordination of the activities
of the Narcotic Bureau with those of the Customs Agency Service and other
Treasury organizations in obtaining more effective narcotics enforcement in
the New York area.
— oOO'

T h e iSffisJiajli/1M

. A , o a n

Juan, ieurto Rico,

Customs teem fpp¡sSsfeafc made high score in the prelimi nary
matches but finished fourth in the finals.
Secretary Morgenthau congratulated the winners
and stated that the matches had proved so successful that
.+
'
C ^ v CCa^ u ,/
^
to s«sasss±*UT them as annual .eventsjSsrxfe*
Hzxtxygxx (ghe trophy~oup') noVTa'd'Tgthe Bureau of Custl
will be^subject of competition again next year.
SikE X3IX±XhXXXE3DXLXX±±t:±EH

In

ctober, 1934, xx

under direction of the

Secretary, the Treasury department instituted the training
of Ki± law enforcement officers by experts of the United
States Coast Uuarid• ^fter preliminary training ±nx
writh .22 caliber small arms more than

4 ,000

officers

had qualified with .38 caliber arms and were qualified to
enter in this year *s competition.

JIM.
w

Secretary Morgenthau today macdx presented a
trophy cup to the Eureau of Customs and ±hj¿ixi&xxi: medals ti­
le ading
b&
f*
members of steams and individual competitors in the'matches!
in feaall arms markmahship concluded yesterday

Qu*» V!

xhe winning three-man team x e xx e h Iix represented!
the El Paso (Texas) Customs Border Patrol, ■‘
•he team made a

O
score of 770 of
gold medals.

pos s ib

a

l e

900 T

The scond team

'

C>£, &*,-•><L|

Its memhersYrec.e ived Q

35

with a score of 756

represented the Seattle (Washington) Customs ^order Patrol.I
_

1 ip W V

—

Its member^Areceived silver medals»
0. score

X

\1 |

of 723. represented the White House
0 ¿X *G & \ j

f

^

i

,SU-'V'—

| g

E | *

ji

xhe(Jfchird team, wi h
'lice e Its

| 4~

^received ftronze medals.
The high individual marksmCn.5.i
V
and their scorn
all members of the Customs Border Patrol ,Awb,re:
281 of a possible 300j'
^
First,- E. L. Ballinger, amitiisT El Paso 1/ second- M. R .
^2761

^J\

Rogers, Seattle^!third - L. H. Anderson,

Havre (Montana),

265.

XhsxEx±K±±xi
Cold, silver and bronze medals were
respectively to
awarded .first, second and third marksmen in the individual
event•
Preliminary matches were held in 15 cities in the
United States andduerto Rico' October 30, -‘
T T-mimt .ith
258 men in 67 teams, competing for the honor of visiting
Washington for the finals. Hkch contestant used a .38 edit*
revo ver ^ith four-inch barrel and open factory sights.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, November 17, 1936.

Press Service
No« 8^*90

Secretary Morgenthau today presented a trophy cup to the Bureau of Customs
and medals to nenhers of leading teams and to leading individual competitors in
the Treasury Department national matches in small arms narkmanship concluded
yesterday at Camp Simms«.
The winning three-man team represented the El Paso (Texas) Customs Border
Patrol«'.

The team made a score of 770 of a possible 900«

Ballinger,

q

Its members,, E« L«.

* A« Toole and 0. B« Gardiner, received gold medals«.

The second

team, with a score of 756, represented the Seattle (Washington) Customs Border
Patrol*

Its members*. M* R«, Rogers,. P* M« Chapman and L. J« Trones,. received

silver medals*
Police*

The third team, with a score of 723, represented the White House

Its members, J. J, Cash, R«. G*. Eord and R« F* Hallion,. received bronze

medals*
The high individual marksmen, all members of the Customs Border Patrol,
and their scores,, were:

First - E* L« Ballinger, El Paso, 281- of a possible 300

second - M«- R« Rogers, Seattle,. 276; third - L. H* Anderson,. Havre (Montana), 265
Gold, silver and bronze medals were awarded respectively to first, second and
third marksmen in the individual event«
Preliminary matches were held in 15 cities in the United States and at
San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 30, with 258 men, in 67 teams, competing for the
honor of visiting Washington for the finals«

Each contestant used a «38 caliber

revolver, with four-inch barrel and open factory sights*
The San Juan, Puerto Rico,, Customs team made high score in the preliminary
matches but finished fourth in the finals«

- 2 -

Secretary Morgenthau congratulated, the winners and stated that the matches
had proved so successful that it was planned to continue then as annual events*
The trophy cup* now h eld "by the Bureau of Customs, will he tbe^subject of competi­
tion again next year*
In October, 1934, under direction of the Secretary, the Treasury Department
instituted the training of law enforcement officers by experts of the United
States Coast Guard.

After preliminary training with .22 caliber small arms more

than 4,000 officers had qualified with *38 caliber arms and were qualified to
enter in this yearns competition.

‘-oOo—

m m m m m m m onmm?
ABOARD

COAST GUARD CDTTER
SA«
IK FORT AT m a S M
¿ S U B

0« XJKMM

It Is proposed to include in the announcement tomorrow of the appointment
of Morrison Shafroth as Assistant General Counsel for the Bureau of
Internal Revenue a statement somewhat as follows
Q0OT1 Arthur H* Kent
who has been acting Chief Counsel of the Bureau of Internal Revenue is
being anointed to the position of Assistant General Counsel of the
Treasury Department to take the place left vacant by the resignation of
Clayton X* Turney* Mr* Kent has been acting head of the Internal Bevenue
division of th© Treasury Department's legal staff since the resignation
last year of Robert B* Jackson who left the Treasury Department to become
Assistant Attorney General 0KQTJOTI
It Is also proposed that before
giving out this statement the Secretary and I will see Kent tomorrow
morning and the Secretary will advise Kent of these changes STOP
I understand that this arrangement has already been discussed with and
approved by you but have you any suggestions or comments to make as te
the procedure above described STOP Please reply to arrive here tonight
if possible or not later than the first thing tomorrow morning*

OPPER

(Initialed) C. V. 0,

jsu, ±y_5u+-+uunLiULma
* Total all
*
banks

|

\

onpT
banks

All hanks
other than
national

:

Banks other than national

:
State
:(commercial)*

j Private
* banks

• Mutual
• savings

LIABILITIES-Continued
Certified and cashiers* checks, cash
letters of credit, etc.............
Deposits not classified..............
Total deposits.................
Bills payable.................. ......
Rediscounts........ .................
Agreements to repurchase securities
sold........................... .
Acceptances executed by or for ac­
count of reporting banks..........
Interest, taxes, and other expenses
accrued and unpaid.................
Dividends declared but not payable
and amounts set aside for undeclare d
dividends and for accrued interest
on capital notes and debentures,...
Other liabilities....................
Capital notes and debentures........
Preferred stock......................
Common stock................. ........
Surplus...............................
Undivided profits-net........ .......
Reserves for contingencies..........
Retirement fund for preferred stock
and capital notes and debentures...
Total..........................

96

636
—

3 2 ,13 9 .36 2

10,059,951

2,425
44f

1+2.796
563

31+,373
552

3*39
—

883

586

297

297

—

—

208,005

95.6 59

112,346

112,346

—

—

7 1 .7 7 6

1+7 .3 1 6

24,460

1 7 ,7 0 7

6,751

2 8 ,oU3

5 ,1+30
365,123
2l+l+,7i9
190,178
1,29*+,95*
2 ,1+35,025

2,030
310 ,992
2 2 6 ,13 2
19 0 ,178

58,339>815
45,221
1,010

33*73

353. 6UU
— »
26,200,453

480,144
2,592

17

479,412
2,575
2 1 ,496,282

833>788
2,592

. 527>305

1 6 2 ,1 S2

2 4 4 ,7 19
633.667
706,427
1+23.632

— .
1*3,1+89
1,247,886
973,393
31+6,039
11+7 ,2 1 9

11,390

7.7 0 2

3,688

3>1+57

6 7 ,198,581

29,702,839

37,1+95,71+2

2 5 ,35 5 ,5 15

2,542,S40
3,4 o s ,4i s

*Includes loan and trust companies and stock savings banks.

360,388
276 *13

1,248,529
1,270,873
210,978

230,789

583,129
4,984
Î1

2

3,400

1 4 ,9 1 1
18,587
—
—

1 ,1 3 1 ,7 6 7
11+8,966
21,053

231
1 1 ,1+09,056

39,220
— *
—
46,425
32,385
444

2 4 ,5 7 1
—

731,171

■BUK -RB U A b i L ! ,

MUJWimii M W ü P JL M iü J,

M o b âjew > ^ ov-emtiër
//- /<f~3 4

6.

S'- ? /

Because of the many requests for information with respect to all active hanks in the country as of June 30,
1936, the Comotroller of the Currency has released the following information, which will subsequently he included
in his annual report to Congress as required in Section 333 of the -Revised Statutes:
Statement of assets and liabilities of all hanks June 30, 1936
(Amounts in thousands of dollars)
J
*
Banks other than national
All hanks
Total all
| National
other than
hanks
*
hanks
*
;
Mutual
: Private
*
State
<
•1
national
* (commercial)* • savings
* hanks
ffumher of hanks....................
15>803
5 ,3 7 4
10,429
566
9 >732
131
ASSETS
Loans on real estate...............
$ 8 ,5 15,70 8
$ 1 ,370,^69
$ 7 ,14 5 ,2 3 9
$3 ,SU2
$2 ,12 0 ,8 7 1
$5,020,526
Other loans........................
6 ,388,680
5,924,817
1 2 .3 1 3 . P 7
5 ,72 8 ,5 16
10 3 ,19 4
93,107
Overdrafts.........................
9 ,9 5 4
5 ,7 6 1
4,885
4,193
1
875
U. S. Government securities, direct
and fully guaranteed............
1 7 ,358.200
8,447,364
8 ,910,836
2,082,005
343,854
6,Usi+,977
Other bonds and securities.... .
4 ,035,261
6,466 ,072
3,607,940
1 0 ,50 1,333
86,760
2,771,372
Banking house, furniture and
fixtures....... .................
1,363,426
6*41,550
7 2 1,8 7 6
580,286
134,014
7,576
Real estate owned other than hanking house........................
184,123
1,263,742
4 10 ,4 73
1 ,0 79 ,6 19
667,399
1,7*7
Cash in vault......................
1 ,0 18 ,9 5 1
4 3 3,2 10
531,694
1,8 7 0
1*3 7,2 5 7
5 2 ,17 7
Balances with other hanks, including reserve with reserve agents.. 14, 1 0 3 ,1*30
7,8p,732
5 ,620,525
6 ,253,698
140,745
492,428
Other assets.......................
750,340
249,773
500,567
363,832
40,708
96,027
Total........................
29,70P,g39
67,198,581
37,495,742
11,409,056
2 5 ,3 5 5 ,5 1 5
731,171
LIABILITIES
Demand deposits of individuals,
partnerships, and coruorations...
Time deposits of individuals, partnerships, and coroorations......
State, county, and municiual
deposits.........................
U. S. Government and nostal savings
deuosits..........................
Denosits of other hanks...........

22,461,996

1 1 ,665,872

1 0 ,79 6 ,12 4

1 0 ,3 5 7 ,10 6

3,623

435,395

23,446,681

7 ,0 74,544

1 6 ,3 7 2 ,1 3 7

6,278,679

1 0 ,0 55,2 75

38,183

3,342,848

2,108,486

1 ,234,362

1,228,884

787

4 ,6 9 1

1 ,3 4 6 ,1 1 6

829,903
4 ,168,004

5 16 ,2 13

5 16 ,2 13

2 ,7 37,79 0

2 ,633,413

6 ,905,794

—

—
153

104,224

Assets and l i a b i l i t i e s of a.j.1 os-nlcs Jun.0 3 0 * 1336“ ContiiTu.ed.

national
banks

page 2

All banks
other than
!
national

•_____Banks other than national______
State
: Mutual
: Private
:( commercial)* » savings
» banks

In.ABILITIES — Continued
Certified and cashiers’ checks, cash
letters of credit» e t c.... .
Deposits not c l a s s i f i e d ....... .

4so ,ikk
2,59.2

833>78o
2,592

353,6UU

Total deposits ................ 58,339,815
Bills payable .................... .
45,221
Rediscounts ........................ .
1,010
Agreements to repurchase securities
sold .................. .......... ..
323
Acceptances executed by or for ac­
count of reporting b a n u s .... .
20S,OO 5
Interest, taxes, and other expenses
accrued and unpaid ........ .......
71,776
Dividends declared but not payable
and amounts set aside for undeclared
dividends and for accrued interest
on capital notes and debentures ...
33 ,>+73
Other liabilities .............
527,305
Capital notes and debentures .......
244,719
Preferred stock .............. .....
633,667
Common stock ................. .
2,542,340
Surplus ..............................
3,403,4l8
Undivided prof it s-net ......... ..
706,427
Reserves for contingencies ..........
U 23,632
Retirement fund for preferred stock
and capital notes and debentures ..
11,390

26,200,453

32 ,139.362

479,412
2,575
21,49b ,2b2

2,425
447

>+2,796

3^, 373

563

552

526

297

297

ipfä
jj ,¿¡So
^ jj

112,346

112,346

>+7,316

24,46o

17,707

6,751

22,0U3
162,182
—

5, >+30

2,030
310,992
226,132

14,911

Total ....................... .

67,15 s, 531

443,4S9
1,247,226
973,393
346,039
1 ^ 7,219
7,702
29,702,839

^Includes loan and trust companies and stock savings banks

365,123
244,719
190,172
1 ,294,954
2 /435,025
360,32s
276,413
3,622
37,495,742

1QO 178
1 ,24.3,529
1*270,873

210,972
230,729

3, >+57

25,355,515

96
17
10 ,055,951
3,439
—

636
523,129
~4,9S4
11

2

3,>+00
18,527
—

39,220
—
—
46,425

1 ,131,767
143,966
21,053
231
1 1 ,409,056

32,325
444
2>+,57i

731,171

T O R ' T E Z & A O E T w O R T T f n ^ l-ij : w t

>

S

e

Monday, November 23, 1936.

r

v

i

c

e

Washington

Ho.

^ - 91

11-13-36
Because of the many requests for information with respect to all active hanks in the country as of June 30»
1936, the Comptroller of the Currency has released the following information, which will subsequently he included
in his annual report to Congress as required in Section 333
the Revised Statutes:
Statement of assets and liabilities of all hanks June 30, 1936

*
*
H um ber

of

hanks

( Am ount s
T o ta l

in

th ou san d s
■;’ s t i o n a l

a ll

banks

’

banks

1 5 .5 0 3

..........................................

of

d o lla r s)
:

A ll

:

oth er

:

banks

:

th an

•

n a tio n a l

:

Banks

th an

n a tio n a l

•

M u tu al

( c o m m e r c ia l)* :

sa v in g s

S ta te

566

9 ,7 3 2

1 0 ,4 2 9

5 , 3 7 1+

oth er

ï

P r iv a te
hanks
I

3I

ASSETS
Loans

on

O th er

lo a n s

f h r f i r r l r a . f t, s
U.

S.

.....................

$ 3 ,5 1 5 ,7 0 3

....................................................

1 2 ,3 1 3 ,* + 9 7

r e a l

e s ta te

. . . .............................................

G -overn m en t

and

f u lly

g u a ra n teed

bonds

and

B a n k in g

h ou se,

f i TThiTTfifi
R ea l
in g
C ash

h ouse

B a la n c e s
in g
O th er

ow ned

w ith

reserv e
a s s e ts

oth er

th an

w ith

$

2 , 12 0 ,3 7 1
5 ,7 2 3 ,5 1 6

1 1 .1 9 3

6 , 434,977
3 . 607,940

4 ,3 3 5

$

5 , 020,526
9 3 ,1 0 7
1

ban k s,
reserv e

$ 3 ,3 4 2

10 3 ,19 4
375

2 ,7 7 1 ,3 7 2

34 3,35 4
36,760

5 3 0 ,2 3 6

1 3 4 ,0 1 4

7 ,57 6

1 , 079,619

4 1 0 ,4 7 3

667,399
5 2 ,1 7 7

1,7 4 7
1,3 7 0

4 9 2 ,4 2 3

l4 0 ,745
4 0 ,7 0 3
7 3 1 ,1 7 1

1 7 , 353,2 0 0

S, 1

* 7 ,3 6 4

2 , 9 10 ,8 36

1 0 ,5 0 1 ,3 3 3

4 ,0 3 5 ,2 6 1

6 ,4 6 6 ,0 7 2

X ,3 6 3 .4 2 6

6 4 1,55 0

7 2 1,8 7 6

1 ,2 6 3 ,7 4 2

1 8 4 ,1 2 3

2 ,0 3 2 ,0 0 5

bank-

.............................................
oth er

$ 7 ,1 4 5 ,2 3 9
5 ,9 2 4 ,8 1 7
5 ,7 6 i

so

and

....................................................

v a u lt

T o ta l

fu r n itu r e

.

................................ ..........................

e s ta te

in

9 ,9 5 4

..................

s e c u r itie s

1 , 3 7 0 , 1 + 09
6 ,3 S S ,6

d ir e c t

s e c u r itie s ,

O th er

$

1 , 0 1 s , 9 51

5 3 1 .6 9 * 1

4 3 7 ,2 5 7

4 3 3 ,2 1 0

1 4 , 10 3 .4 3 0

7 , 249 ,732

6 , 2 5 3 , 6°8

5 , 620,525

in c lu d ­
a g en ts

,

.........................................................................
.....................................................

7 5 0 ,3 1 »

2 4 9 ,7 7 3

5 0 0 ,5 6 7

3 6 3 ,2 3 2

6 7 ,1 9 3 ,5 3 1

2 9 ,7 0 2 ,3 3 9

3 7 / 495 , 7 4 2

2 5 ,3 5 5 ,5 1 5

96,027
1 1 , 409,056

2 2 ,4 6 1 ,9 9 6

1 1 ,6 6 5 ,3 7 2

10 7q £ lpk

1 0 , 3 5 7 ,10 6

3,6 2 3

4 3 5 ,3 9 5

2 3 ,4 4 6 ,6 3 1

7 ,0 7 4 ,5 4 4

1 6 , 3 7 2 ,13 7

6 , 273,679

1 0 ,0 5 5 ,2 7 5

3 3 ,1 3 3

3 .3 4 2 ,3 4 3

2 ,1 0 3 ,4 3 6

1 , 234 ,36 2

1 ,2 2 3 ,3 3 4

1 ,3 4 6 ,1 1 6

8 2 9 ,9 0 3

6 ,9 0 5 .7 9 4

4 , l6 S ,0 0 4

5 16 ,2 13
2 , 737,790

5 16 ,2 13
2 , 6 3 3 ,4 13

LIABILITIES
Demand deposits of individuals,
partnerships, and corporations ..
Time deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations .....
State, county, and municipal
deposits ........................
U. S. Government and -costal savings
deposits .........................
Deposits of other banks ...........

777
(o(

4,691
—

*
—

15 3

1 0 4 ,2 2 4

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE , 1 3 S » NEWSPAPERS
Friday, November 20, 1956«_____
11/ /36

Press Service
No. 3 - 9 ^

Secretary Morgenthau has appointed Arthur H. Kent, of Chicago,
Illinois, to he Assistant General Counsel of the Treasury Department,
filling the place made vacant by the recent resignation of Clayton M.
Turney,
Mr, Kent has been associated with the legal staff of the Treasury
„

,

.............. V

*/

.

Mr, Kent will take over his new duties in the Treasury Department
about December 1st, when Morrison Shafroth of Denver assumes his duties
as Assistant General Counsel for the Bureau of Internal Revenue,

— oOo—

7

Draft for Press Release

The President has appointed Morrison Shafroth of
Denver, Colorado, to bo Assistant General Counsel of the
treasury Department for the Bureau of Inters»! Revenue*
The appointment fill« the vacancy caused by the resignation
of Robert H* Jackson to become As si stant Attorney General «
Mr. Shafroth Is a member o f the law flra of Grant,
Kills» Shafroth and foil of Denver and is a eon of the late
John Franklin Shafroth* twice Governor of Colorado and Bolted
States Senator fro® 1915 to 1919*
Be was graduated fro® the Uhlvarsity of Michigan in
1910 and later received the degree o f Doctor of Jurisprudence
fro® the same Institution»

Be has served on the faculties

of the Westminster lew School and the University of Denver
lew School»

During the World W a r he served a t the front as

a Captain in the 541st Field Artillery»

Be m s Democratic

nominee for Attorney Genera! of Colorado in 1920 and for
United States Senator fro® Colorado in 1924«

>**000—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, AFTERNOON NEWSPAPERS,
Friday, November 20, 1936.

P ress Service
N°* 8-92

Secretary Morgenthau has appointed Arthur H. Kent, of Chicago, Illinois»
to he Assistant Gen®ral Counsel of the Treasury Department, filling the place
made vacant by the recent resignation of Clayton M. Turney.
Mr. Kent has been associated with the legal staff of the Treasury
Department during the last two years and since February of this year he has
been Acting Chief Counsel of the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
Mr, Kent will take over his new duties in the

Treasury Department

about December 1st, when Morrison Shafroth of Denver assumes his duties
as Assistant Ceneral Counsel for the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
•oOoo

- 2 ~

In addition to the statements to which reference is made above, copi
of communications from the Governments of The Netherlands and Switzerland
are made public herewith.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
1

Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Tuesday, November 24, 1936.
11/23/36

Press Service
TTn «„os
■

By authority of the President the Secretary of the Treasury announces 1
that as a further step in the direction of international monetary equilibrium^
arrangements have "been mac|e to give effect to the desire of the Governments
of Belgium, The Netherlands and Switzerland to cooperate with the Governments«
of the United States, Great Britain and France in accordance with the principles
of the tripartite declaration of September 25, 1936.
The Belgian Government notified the United States of its adherence to
these principles on September 26*

Similar declarations of adherence have now I

been received from the Governments of The Netherlands and Switzerland.
The Governments of the United States, Great Britain, and France welcome*
the declarations of the Governments of Belgium, Switzerland and The Netherlands
expressing their adherence to the principles stated in the tripartite declare I
tion of September 25.
Arrangements have been made by the United States Treasury for gold
transactions on a reciprocal basis with these three countries.

These arrange­

ments are given effect by public statements of the Secretary of the Treasury
which are annexed hereto:
(1) A statement supplementing the statement of the Secretary of the

Treasury dated October 13, 1936, with respect to reciprocal transactions in
gold with certain countries, and withdrawing the statement of January 31, 1934^
relating to the sale of gold for export;
(2) A statement naming the countries of Belgium, The!Ha-therlands"'nnd
Switzerland as complying with the conditions of the statement of October 13
as supplemented by the above statement.

TREASURY

DEPARTM ENT

Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NE7SFAFSRS,
Tuesday, November ¿4, lqafi.
11/23/36

Press Seryice
No. 8-94

Supplementing the announcement-made by him on-Octoter 13, 1936, relati*
to the sale

if

gold for export, the Secretary of the Treasury states that

(hereafter,;;ina until, on twenty-four hours' notice, this statement of intenticj
■x may be revoked or altered) the United States, in addition to sales of gold t o f
T ® exohane y equalization or stabilization funds of foreign countries, will
\
!
’
also sell gold for immediate export to, or earmark for the account of, the
treasuries, or any fiscal agencies acting for or whose acts in this connectJ
are guaranteed by the treasuries, of those countries whose treasuries or
fiscal agencies so acting or guaranteed are likewise offering to sell gold to
the United States, provided such offerings of gold are at such rates and upon
; such ,terms and.-conditions as the Secretary may deem most advantageous to the 1
yPJ"b '

* terest.

The Secretary announces herewith, andjwill hereafter announcj

daily, the names rf the foreign countries complying with the foregoing con­
ditions.

All such sales of gold by the United States will be made through

-tho Jaderal Reserve Bank .f New York, as fiscal agent of the United States,
upon the following terms and conditions which the Secretary of the Treasury
deems most advantageous to the public interest:
Sales of gold will be made at $35 per fine ounce, plus
one-quarter per centhandling-charge,. -and sales and earmarking
will be governed by the Regulations issued under the;-Gold Re­
serve Act of 1034.
The Secretary further announces that his statement of .January 31,
relating to the sale of gold for-export, is accordingly-withdrawn.

19 3 4 ,

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

EOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. November 24. 1936.
11/23/36

Press Service
No. 8-95

The Secretary of the Treasury today named the following additional
countries:
Belgium
The Netherlands
Switzerland
as complying with the condi-ti-ons.--specifi-ed in- his press release of October 131
1936, as supplemented by his press release of November 24, 1936, for the
purchase of gold from the United States for immediate export-.or earmark.

— oOo—

\
\
Ü

\
\

TREASURY DEPART!-,CENT

Washington

Press Service
No. 8-56

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS
Tuesday. November'34, 1936.____
11/23/36
'

The Secretary of the Treasury^ynahe^'nublic"’the--Rollowlng^crl7e'Wh~omr
the Swiss Legation, transmitted to the Treasury Department "by the Acting
Secretary of State:

"LEGATION DE SUISSE
Washington, D. C.
November 21, 1^36.
"Sir:
"I have the hon«r to inform you. that I have "been instrucrtedr by my
Government to cvnvey to you the following:
"’The Government of Switzerland has cognizance of the
declarations "by which the Governments of France, Great Britain
and the United States of America have, seen fit to express their
intentions with regard to their monetary policy and adheres to
the general principles stated in their tripartite declaration
of September 25.’
"Accept, Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.
(Signed) MARC PETER
Minister of Switzerland.
"The Honorable
R. Walton Moore,
Acting Secretary of State,
W a sh in g to n ."

—

0 O0 —

MED

-

4

-

# 3 6 2 , Nov e m b e r

16,12

p . n . ..t o

Paris

so a c t i n g o r g u a r a n t E E d arE l i k E w i s E o f f E r i n g t o
se

I I

g o l d t o thE UnitEd States, p r o v i d E d s u c h -

o f f E r i n g s o f go-id a r e a t s u c h r a t E s and u p o n s u c h
tErms a nd c o n d i t i o n s a s thE S E c r E t a r y n a y deem
m o s t advantageous t o thE p u b l i c i n t E r E s t .

ThE

S E c r E t a r y a n n o u n c e s h e r e w i t h , and w i l l h E r E a f t E r
announcE d a i l y , thE names o f thE f o r E i g n c o u n t r i E S
c o m p l y i n g w i t h thE f o r e g o i n g c o n d i t i o n s .

A ll

s u c h s a l e s o f g o l d b y thE U n i t e d S t a t e s w i l l bE
:aadE t h r o u g h thE P E d E r a l RESErvE Bank o f New
Yo r k , a s f i s c a l agEnt o f thE U n i t e d S t a t E s , u p o n

the f o l l o w i n g t e r n s and c o n d i t i o n s , , w h ic h t h e
S E c r E t a r y o f thE T r e a s u r y deems m o st a d v a n t a g e o u s
t o thE p u b l i c i n t E r E 3 t ' ;
w,SalES of gold will bE made at §35 pEr

finE ouncE, plus onE-quartEr pEr cEnt handling
charge, and salEs and earmarking will bE
govErnEd by thE Regulations issued undEr
thE Gold RESErvE Act of 1934.*
"The S E c r E t a r y f u r t h e r a n n o u n c e s t h a t h i s
sta te m e n t of January

31,

1934,

r e l a t i n g t o thE

salE of g old f o r E xport, i s a c c o r d in g ly w ith d raw n . n
MOORE
ACTING
EAsFLsLMS

fl

IvED

TiLEGRAH SENT

GRAY
November

16,

1 936

12 p«m,
AKEMBASSY
P A R IS

(FRANCE)

462,

' URGENT
For Cochran from the Secretary of the Treasury,
Hold the folloYdng without action until further
Instructions,
Submit to II, Auriol, for his comments, the draft
of a statement to be is sue d by the Treasury Department
which terminates this telegram.

Please urge upon II,

Auriol the Importance of prompt consideration,

I am

also submitting the draft to the British in Washington
for their comment.

It is not to be submitted to the

Belgians, Swiss or Netherlanders until after we havE
heard from the British and French,
If a statement such as is hEre proposed were made
thE prEss might put to
following:

hie

some such question as the

"Since thE Belgian government owns no

gold, Goes this

hie an

that thE Belgian Government is

guaranteeing thE Execution by the National Bank of
Belgium of thE obligations undertaken under tills
arrangement?" If thE accompanying draft is approved
by thE British, F re n c h , and Belgian Governments, I,
intend

MED

- 2 - #462, November 16, 1936 12 p*m.to Paris

intEnd that you shall tliEn inquirE of thE BElgian

Government whEthEr it would bE agrEEablE to it if I
should rEply to a quEstion such as thE forEgoing by
simply saying ify E s %

CominunicatE to M-. Auriol my

intention indieatEd in this paragraph*

Ho tic E that thE significant phrasE in thE nEw
statement is ,for any fiscal agEnciEs acting for or whosE
act3 in this connection arE guaranteed by thE TrEa~

surie s,. *. •' T h a t .would include , of cour s e , thE Bank
of Belgium as indicatEd in thE contents of thE letter
from M# DET.Ian not Ed in your cablegram Ho* 1061, of
OctobEp 28*

That lEtter will be an important itEia in

our filE*
1 fur thE r suggest to thE French and British GovernniEnts that it would bE hElpful if thE Swiss and the
HEtherlandErs would sEnd via thEir Foreign Offices to
thE thrEE governments participating in thE original
tripartite declaration of SEptEmber 25, 1936, a
declaration of adherence to the gEneral principles of
that statement,

similar in spirit to thE statEriEnt issue«

on SeptEmbEr 26, 1936, by thE BElgian government and
communicated on that datE to thE StatE Department and
thE Foreign Offices of the other two governments*
I further suggest that, 24 hours after thE rECEipt
of such a statement from thE Swiss and NethEr landers.

England,

e United States is informed th
of Great Bri
ration wit!

ents
ollabo-

lands

witzerland.

In addition to the statements to which reference is made above, copies
of iks communications from the

Governments of The Netherlands and Switzerland

are made public herewith,

i

i
v.

cr^~y 's^\

No

"^ -* 7 y

T)tr
jjy

■ion of
A

th e

President the

S ecreta ry

of the Treasury announces

that as a further step in the direction of international monetary equilibrium
arrangements have been made to give effect to the desire of the Governments
of Belgium, The Netherlands and Switzerland to co-operate with the Governments
of thp United states, Great Britain and Prance in accordance with the principle
of the^declaration of September 25, 1936*
The Belgian Government notified the United States of its adherence to
;hese principles on September 26. Similar declarations of adherence
:

1

n"" il""‘

r^acLj ass

'have now been received from the

Governments of The Netherlands and Switzerland,
I

The Goverrait of
the Gqyernme{i>s of

Unite^State's-^elcome^ thc-./a&
anà-^reat Britain****

.6u~G. *<SZC Vi“ *.
u
f
p
j
(

Arrangements have been made^for gold transactions on a reciprocal basis
with these three countries. ©3

■t oi- th » United at 1 too 1gy

Jfhese

arrangements are given effect by public statements of the Secretary of the
Treasury which

gje

annexed hereto:

(1) A statement supplementing the statement of the Secretary of the
Treasury dated October 13, 1936, with respect to reciprocal transactions in
gold with certain countries, and withdrawing the statement of January 31, 1934,
relating to the sale of gold for export;
52) A statement naming the countries of Belgium, The Netherlands
and Switzerland as complying with the conditions of the statement of October
13 as supplemented by the above statement.

msssmjm u m m i m

»

lo r o n è o r

SX*

m* w m

Siri»
JMtag upe» IMmfffetM ot th» ItaMwr ef Berilio
iXfair® of tho im k æ tlm ë tM 1 M m itü t o o r to lxtftm Ä

EcoolXeacy o f the

dow larotioa mù& fcjf E$r O w n*-

Miti

nTìm Qmmrmimà

of tl» BMtttâattAft im s

of ito M in t is i» tgr ä

Ite Stoormosit« of

ä

frm m *

Onsat BrLMA a*£ tho tft&Mt Stato« to o a w f i t to
®sp*W M tr iMmtim with regard to tfcoir
peUay «od odl^ro« to th© g « M pri»elp2o© stotod ir,
tha&r triportito^ doolwtio» # Sa^toohor SS# Ä

1

I « m il x y m lt o f th i# o p p M o d ty to ïo ïw to

you# Sir* M «MMW® of flr

M ^ ïm t m m & àm & im *

B#

’

.;

|i

Æ ' :&■

w#**

Í:0¡
0« m

'
8 M M &

Ornato*

C t o p * d*Àffoiro® a*i*
o f th& BoMwrXüiâs*
fho t o a t t ó d » 8* Mitant B o w

A M L Ó ® 0owtai*y of Stato
W m È â & ^ m * WA

.

3JP86

¡papi rnmsmMB îMâffflffî
Imtt&mMW ¿il llPtel

lisi# W T M

ypgs

$$? ils WÈXÊMÈttiÊf »

âffiiâ*t o f t e l l f i Ä t e i # I t a m tt» t a m r to its»** f w
wilfcj

u>*'ü¿:i«n J^,.1 ^

o>_ jrtf’ rA~iiflKY1rt1

ir ÌI$:

.aa«ai.,.jJÉÍt.¿tW-.:-wri

*j?%'itMt.' .tUC^P .n..

MMsL. \gfi .-¿.i k'.¿A- ■íií««kjÉKí'jätiäiii

16i<Íík-dÍ^ Thìfaiti ¿ju ¡àrïè iTtVlr'lYirli Ir. lIMiiW

^||NSw^l^Sm4¡IÍS Ì&8N^||' lîjip Wfìf

flStl&t

■ '■' :;.J'

***!$>

O f 't l S B S S ÌiS f3 $ £ ^ IH #

Of t íS

I g ìit& ilii t t S Ö P ^ Ä ^ f c Of
S c i s t o jftjj tfaO tlN ttÉ t IM Steft Ig & l ( U S

WNfâlfÊÊtëÊtÉ S lt?

Ialiti»

OM

tO

%0 t t e l l * ISÒfSt$Ì'$f

j^cíXio^r fls ä ., sà^ ooisii t o tfeso j^o^Sì^3< j^i ì ì s s ÌI ìsSpss n i s t o à I®-.

m
Jt■

fcM
nfñ•

*tHIB^ l a i i i i m P

u
M
3È&

'Sisifi'. %jP&
É&
dffc. .ijÈÉ

S i# J |p ||p

X SV&1X $ $ » & £ # f %t&# O ü t i P t o î i ^ t p
.. ■^t.-ju.,-. .,>

ÌmÉ® “i^ikv

fmtrn Wmm¡j|

-A iB .v:.hBfe:

■-**,'.•■^A-jj->^i ¿i litritliwi^-jitùti■••jjit ria ltfi*i

n* ■

.’é è w 1 "iMMiiiti Mi * ¿. .38 ^-^lfflnViii#>ifMTfrimi

ana^fii Æfitr üw-'ot

. . . , - , ; ,'.i

MM* §« 'IMI
teg;
Sf' t l s

USSSite^f n f S ^ É S
$*£#

WÊSÊ0 t o
¿ÍÉÉÉtfc* ■

;,,:.

ìkMgSs»*
é^Ì,m

m n*

m m , nmmffijm m m n m

sue**

nwmàmr n 0 w m *

2So* STO

pLtpk^Y!^ xilosi Ssstarwtà,®ti8 o f ttao IS slsS ^ * ^ $s&9£i0ik.
Affeiiri» o f -Its« IJottoXiim!# I taro t l » tos&r H inffcm tour
t e U e s ^ o r th» fo llo *! Kg àm l& m tim mà& ty sfr Sow m *
SWfltS
* ^ ¡0

0w©«ssa@53& of tl® l^Sttrlttod* ha® ©ogni««»*»

oT t im &«®l*r*ti«ft® ty «blob t i » Só^rm osit« of Frano®,
S *m i Britttta #sni thè IM M . Stato« hr/e eoe» f i t t e
tM Lr la te n ti«» with reg*r& to tb e ir jae®eta*y
poHoy fmd tóheret} to thè generai principi©® et&tod 1»
tfeeir trip a rtite deelaratioa oC Se$t«&©r I i # is s a **
I sprall vtgm%£ o t tìd » opportunità to ranew to
yen, $ lr, thè m m m thm M of %

B*

. ,/,:i ; fp ''4i''V

oojisld#raticsw
-:

■ES$

f f »

.. -

w*s# 0« t o Braugel tiouglas*
Charsg» ^ A f f a i r e » **!•
#r t t è
p i ìi»©rabl# 1# Walton f e w
Accingi Seewfei&iy ef Stato
Washington, B*C# -

COFi*

m m i m m m u m

t m m m

w mhingbm*

lío rm b e r Z l0 1336

lio. $778

Sin»
Aotiiig upon imrfcrxietiona of the Mlsiotor of Poreiga
Affsdra of ifo©

1 ÍMm

tí» h am r t© i n f o m Your

Bxoollimcy o f ti» folio®!ng docl&rutic» modo bjr my G o v o m amtc
w7h© Sovonaaont of tí» Hetberliuad« bao eogniói&MS#
of tí» doolaraiion# %

«hich ti» Gowraaont# of Franco,

Qro&t Brltain asid the tfnitod States havo i m

f it t o

expro«* ifcoir iafeontlosi witb rogará to t&eir laonetary
polioy oad adheros t o tho general principies etated i»,
thoir tripartito deelaration of Soptossibor 28»
I «pail r^rsolf of thia opp^rtyid.% to

m am

t©

pou# Sir, tho aesu ranees of ng? M g í w m t oonaidoratian.

s,
w*o#

8* Tan Breugol Bouglas#

Ch&rge d*AffiBires a. i.
of tbo líerfcherlamia,

fho Honorable íU Walten loor#
Actlng Soorotary of State
Washington, B.C.

P||

,

, || H

• | S | i • T| v" : •• „

COPY*
BDYM, H B T H E K m m LBGATIOB

Washington, D.C*,
H ostember 01, 1936*

Bo* 3776

Sir»«*
Acting upon instructions of the Minister of Foreign
Affairs of the Bother land#

1

have the honor to inform Your

I x o e H o n e y of the following declaration made b y m y Governmenti
#jhe Government of the Bother lands has cognizance
of the declarations by Which the Governments of France,
Great Britain and the Baited States have seen fit t o
express their Intention w i t h regard t o their monetary
policy and adheres t o the general principles stated in
their tripartite declaration of September 25, 1936»*

1

avail myself of this opportunity to renew to

you. Sir, the assurances of m y highest consideration*

all

B»
w*s*

0« van Brouge 1 Douglas*

Charge d ’Affaires a*i*
of the Betherlands*
Yhe Honorable E« Walton Moore
Acting Secretary of State
Washington*

1

C O P I.

ROYAL HETHERLAND LEGATION

Washington, D.C.,
November 21, 1936*

No. 3775

Sir:Acting upon instructions of the Minister of Foreign
Affairs of the Netherlands I have the honor to inform Your
Excellency of the follovdng declaration made by my Govern­
ments
"The Government of the Netherlands has cognizance
of the declarations by which the Governments of France,
Great Britain and the United States have seen fit to
express their intention with regard to their monetary
policy and adheres to the general principles stated in
their tripartite declaration of September 25, 1936."
I avail myself of this opportunity to renew to
you, Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.
b,

w.s.

C. van Breugel Douglas.

Charge d*Affaires a©i*
of the Netherlands.
The Honorable R. Walton Moore
Acting Secretary of State
Washington, D.C.

0/

f ' f ?
g

o S’ 1

UCOATZON BE SUISSE
Washington, B.G*

Eovemb«r El, 1956.

Sir*
I have the honor to inform you that I have been
instructed by sy Government to convoy to you the followingt
•the Government of Swltserlaad he» eogniw&nce
of the declaret ion» ty which the Government# of
Frano», Great Britain and the United State# of
America have Caen fit to exprese their intention#
with regard to their nonet».asy policy and adhere#
to 'the general principle® stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September it.*
Accept, Sir, the assurance# of t»y highest consideration.

(S)

MáBC PETER

Minister of Switzerland.

The Honorable
K. Walton Moore,
Acting Secretary of State,
Washington.

Q

?

*

iJWITIOi DE SUISSE
Washington, D.C#

B©veaber 21, 1936«

Sir*
I have the honor to inform you that I have been
Instructed by w

Government to convey to you the following *

*fhe Government of Switzerland has cognizance
of the declarations fcy which the Government® of
France, Great Britain and the United States of
Anerica have seen fit to express their intentions
with regard to their monetary policy and adheres
to the general principle® stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September IS.*
Accept, Sir, the assurances of ay highest consideration.

(s)

mm mm

Minister of Switzerland.

The Honorable
K, Walton Moore,
Acting Secretary of State,
Washington.

LIG&riOH D1 SUISSE
Washington, D.C#

November SI, 1956*

Sirs
I have the honor to Inform you that I have been
Instructed by qy Government to convey to you the following i
»The Government of Switzerland has cognizance
of the declarations by which the Governments of
France, Great Britain and the United States of
America have seen fit to express their intentions
with regard to their monetary policy and adheres
to the general principles stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September 16.»
Accept, Sir, the assurances of wy highest consideration.

(S)

MARC FFTER

Minister of Switzerland.

The Honorable
R* Walton Moore,
Acting Secretaiy of State,
Washington*

C

O

?

r

i m i T I Q N BE SUISSE
Washington, B*C*

1
Bovember 21, 1936*

Sir*
I have the honor to inform you that I have been
instructed by cy Government to convey to you the following t
*!h© Government of Switzerland has cognizance
of the declarations by which the Gov a m m o n t a of
France, Great Britain and the United States of
America have seen fit to express their intentions
with regard to their monetary policy and adheres
to the general principles stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September 26.*
Accept, Sir, the assurances of isy highest consideration.

(S)

MARC PITIE

Minister of Switzerland*

The Honorable
K, Walton Moore,
Acting Secreta jy of State,
Washington*

I

C O P Y
LEGAI IOH DE SUISSE
Washington, D.C.
■ f'1 /;
Hoveaber 21, 1936.

S tri

X have the honor to inform you that I have been
instructed by sy Government to convey to you the following*
*The Government of Switzerland has cognizance
of the declarations by which the Governments of
France, Great Britain and the United States of
America have Seen fit to express their intentions
with regard to their monetary policy and adheres
to the general principles stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September 25.*
Accept, Sir, the assurances of oy highest consideration.

(S)

MARC PETER

Minister of Switzerland#

The Honorable
R* Walton Moore,
Acting Secretaiy of State,
Washington#

c

0

P

Y

LEGATION DE SUISSE
Washington, D.C.

November 21, 1936.
Y>

Sir:
I have the honor to inform you that I have been
instructed by ny Government to convey to you the following:
"The Government of Switzerland has cognizance
of the declarations by which the Governments of
France, Great Britain and the United States of
America have seen fit to express their intentions
with regard to their monetaiy policy and adheres
to the general principles stated in their tri­
partite declaration of September 25."
Accept, Sir, the assurances of ny highest consideration.

(S)

MARC PETER

Minister of Switzerland.

The Honorable
R. Walton Moore,
Acting Secretaiy of State,
Washington.

mmmrnt nm&mwmt
WASBîKftÜg

$erriee<

tbo Stortiti? of tbt Tf^tury tota? a**td tins folX«*ris£ aââltlostl taoaiiittt
'Tiui

^»fifing; with ih» oc&AltltMi êpmtiîmé i» &&* p$mm rmlm.m of 0et6b«r 13»
XfSá» ss « ^ txIcohhsM. by bl« $?$## r®Xm m of Htv&abtr

# 1936» for ths fir*

ob«to of gold from %bo efelidi ©festig for testáisi© cohort or toxmrk*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

FOR RELEASE, M6RNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. November 24, 1936.

Press Service
8-97

1 1 /23/35

The Secretary of the Treasury makes public the following no-te from-'the
Royal Netherland

Legation, transmitted to the Treasury Department by the

Acting Secretary of State:
"ROYAL NETHERLAND LEGATION

Washington, D. 0»

No. 3775

November 21, 1936.

’Sir :■
"Acting upon in structions "of''the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the
Netherlands I have the honor to inform Your Excellency of the following
declaration made by my Government:
"* The Government of the Netherlands has cognizance of the
declarations by which the Governments of France, Great Britain
and the United States have seen fit. to express their intention
with regard to their monetary policy and adheres to the general
principles stated in their tripartite declaration of September 25,
1936.»
"I avail myself of thi s .opp*rduni ty to renew to you, Sir, -the of

—c ^ u x s A d e r a r th o n v

"^(Signed) Gi~VanuBreugelJDouglas.
Charge d!Affaires a.i.
of the Netherlands.
"The Honorable R, Walton Moore,
Acting Secretary of State,
Washington, D. 0."
.

v—

0 O 0—

i

S»ju

K.

THE S E C R E T A R Y O F THE T R E A S U R Y
W ASHINGTON

tress

¿Spr
Supplementing
1936,

relating

the Treasury

to t h e

states

h o u r s f notice,
tered)

will

sell

of,

the

acts

those

countries

guaranteed
provided

are

such

and

plying

immediate

offerings
as

of gold

interest.

foregoing

of N e w ïork,

as

lowing

and

terms

Sales

conditions

ounce,
and

plus

sales

to

sell gold

will

the

for

so a c t i n g

to t h e U n i t e d

rates

announces

and u p o n

such

of

or

Stat e s ,
such

advantageous

herewith,

and

foreign countries

All

or

the treasuries,

deem most

of the

for

sales

m

will

com­

1

of gold by

through the Federal Reserve B a n k
the U n i t e d

public

States,

earmarking

upon the

of

fol­

t he T r e a s u r y

interest:

b e m a d e at $ 3 5

one-quarter

and

such

to t h e

acting

agencies

which the Secretary

to t h e

of gold

fiscal

conditions.

of

by

or a l ­

foreign countries,

agencies

or

a r e at

gold

or e a r m a r k

guaranteed

the names

fiscal agent

deems most advantageous

fiscal

Secretary

will be made

of

to,

S e c r e t a r y may

The

announce daily,

the United S t a t e s

are

offering

the

export

any

treasuries

likewise

with the

or

connection

whose

sales of

s t abilization funds

of

on twen t y - f o u r

of intention may be revoked
to

13,

the Secretary

and until,

in a d d i t i o n

treasuries,

conditions

to t h e p u b l i c
hereafter

f or

him on Oc t o b e r

for export,

(hereafter,

States,

in this

gold

statement

gold

whose

terms

sale of

e q u a l i z a t i o n or

also

account

a n n o u n c e m e n t m a d e by

that

this

the U n i t e d

exchange

the

service

per

per

fine

cent h a n d l i n g

will be

charge,

g o v e r n e d by

the

xm
Regulations
The Secretary
January

31,

accordingly

1934,

issued
further

relating

under

the G o l d

announces

to t h e

sale of

withdrawn.

APPROVED:

.

that

i / 7

The White House
Noverab e r /^r
1936
I

Reserve Act of
his

gold

statement
for

export,

193-4.
of
is

<J

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESS

November 23, 1936.

RECEIPTS OE SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFEIGES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended November 20, 1936:
Philadelphia...... ... .... ...........
813,809,37 fine ounces
h
h
San Erancisco.... ......... ..........
368,466.42
»
h
Denver...... ...... ..... .....................
4,684.42
h
h
1,186,960.21
Total for week ended November 20, 1936... ......
h
it
Total receipts through November 20, 1936.........113,679,762.25
SILVER .TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended November 20, 1936:
Philadelphia ....................... .
New York ............ .....................
San Francisco ..............................
Denver ........ ......... ...................
New Orl eans................. '....*.... .....
Seattle ......................... ........
Total for week ended November 20, 1936 ........
Total receipts through November 20, 1936 .......

it
it

81 00
H 2

989 239.27

I
I
I
I

RECEIPTS OF GOLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
Week ended November 20, 1936:
Imports
- - Philadelphia... .... ........
New York
..........
$15,885,100.00
San Francisco .....
1,493,452.88
Denver. ............___
17,877.63
New Orleans ..........
253.22
Seattle ....................
....
Total for week ended November 20...$17,396,683,73

— oOo—

Secondary
$ 84,934.71
188,500.00
23,611.92
10,852.33
19,116.44
15,198.36
$342,213.76

New
Domestic
$
475.16
301,600.00
1,650,331.52
625,854.65
125[82
571,521.38
$3,149,908.56

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
OFFICE O F

D IR E C T O R O F T H E M IN T

November 21, 1956.

IN REPLYING QUOTE INITIALS

REPORT OF THE RECEIPTS OP GOLD AND SILVER AT TEE MINTS AND
ASSAY OFFICES FOR THE WRRK ENDING NOVEMBER 20. 1956.
GOLD
Imports
Philadelphia
New York
San Francisco
Denver
Nerz Orleans
Seattle
Total

#15,885,100.00
1,495,452.88
17,877.65
255.22
17,596,685.75

Secondary

New Domestic

#84,954.71
188,500.00
25,611.92
10.852.55
19,116.44
15.198.56
542,215.76

#475.16
501,600.00
1,650,551.52
625,854.65
125.82
571,521.58
5,149,908.55

GOLD RECAPITULATION
I m p o r t s ----------------- Secondary - - - - - - - - New Domestic - - - - - - - Total - - - --------Total Receipts to Date (Approx.) - - - -

- - #17,596,685.75
542,215.76
- - 5,149,908.55
• - 20,888,806.02
#4,185,551,299.24

SILVER

Executive Proclamation of 13-31-33(as amended)
Pine Ounces (New mined domestic)
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Denver
Total

815,809.57
568,466.42
4,684.42
1,186,960.21
1 1 3 , 6 7 9 762.25 *

Total Receipts to Date (Approx.)

Executive Proclemation of(Nationalized)
Bullion & Warehouse Certificates - Fine Ounces
Philadelphia _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
New York _____________ ____ ___ m
__
San Fr a n c i s c o
Denver

- ____

_ _____ __ ____
___ ____ __ ____ __

New Orleans - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Seattle - __ _ ______________

_

T o t a l ----- ------- ---------------Total R e c e i p t s to D a t e ------------

GOLD COIN

Estimated.

Domestic
Foreign
Total

81 00

112,989,259.27

_
"5T

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
WASHINGTON
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS.
Tasadar. November 24. 1936.

Press Service
S' ^ iJ\ c ?

11/23/36

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced
last evening that the tenders for 150,000,000, or thereabouts,
of 273-day Treasury bills, dated November 25, 1936, and matur­
ing August 25, 1937, which were offered on November 20, were
opened at the Federal Keserve banks on November 23*
The total amount applied for was 1159,737,000,
of which |50,000,000 was accepted*

The entire amount ac­

cepted was bid at a price of 99*936, equivalent to a rate
of about 0.084 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington

Tress Service

FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday. November 34. 1936«____

•^0# 8-98

11/23/36

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced la s t evening th at the
tenders fo r $50,000,000, or thereabouts, of 273-day Treasury h i l l s , dated
November 25, 1936, and maturing August 25, 1937, which were offered on November 20,
were opened at the Federal Reserve banks on Novemoer 23*
The to ta l amount applied for was $159,737,000, of which $50,000,000 was
accepted«!

The en tire amount accepted was bid at a p rice of 99.936, equivalent

to a ra te of about 0,084 prcent per annum, on a bank discount b a sis.

—oOo—

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
MEMORANDUM EQR THE PRESS

November 30, 1936.

RECEIPTS OE SILVER BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of December 21, 1933) as amended
Week ended November 27, 1936:
Philadelphia.................
San Francisco....................
Denver............... .......
Total for week ended November 27, 1936...... ....
Total receipts through November 27, 1936........ .

326,613.61 fine ounce
192,650.90 "
«
9.765.24 «
»
529 029.75
114,208,792.00

SILVER TRANSFERRED TO UNITED STATES:
(Under Executive Proclamation of August 9, 1934)
Week ended November 27, 1936:
Philadelphia............................
New York....................
San Francisco........................
Denver.............. .
New Orleans ... ;................
Seattle..............
Total for week ended November 27, 1936..... .
Total receipts through November 27, 1936......

192.00 fine ounce!
42.00

»

»

234.00
112,989,473.27

RECEIPTS OF COLD BY THE MINTS AND ASSAY OFFICES:
New
Week ended November 27, 1936:
Imports______ Seco ndary
Domestic
Philadelphia................. .
12,602.00 $ 77,036.30 f
532.4?
New Tork......................!!!!!!. i2,75oiooo!0o
88,600.00
104,700.OC
San Francisco
293,831.66
19,307.57 2,098,933.5C
Denver....
27,402.64
8,990.61
624,470.5!
New Orleans,
263.18
20,599.38
513.9(
- Seattle....
., ,
,
-- .•---- —
8.858.53
91,831.6;
Total for week ended November 27, 1936;..$13,084,099.48 $223,392.39 $2,920,982.lt
ooOoo

TESàSURT i m
wks&tmfm

m

FOR H U M U S , M O R T O © HSbSRàFXlS,
Tuesto* Dceaabcr 1* 1956.
11/30A i

m m

Service

Seoret&ry of thè Treasury Morgenthau amnouneed last cren lag that thè tendere
t o tee series of Treasury bilia, to be dated Decomber 8, 1936, «hich nere offarad
oa Koveaber 2?, «ere opened at thè Federai Reserve banks on Rovaaber 30, 1936.
fendere «ere invited for thè two series to thè aggregete amount of
#100,000,000, or thereabouts, and ♦266,541,000 eoe applied for, of whioh
♦100,101,000 «ae aecepted.

The detalls of thè t«o seriss are as follovss

104-I&Y fESASURY BILL3. MàYOlg© M1RCH 16. 1937
Ibr thie eerlee, «hich «as for #80,000,000, or thereabout e, thè total amount
applied for «aa #138,444,000, of whioh #80,044,000 «as aocepted.

The aecepted

bidè ranged in priee from par to 99.936, thè lattar belng equivalete to a rate
of atout 0*048 percent per anno», on a baak discount baeie.
amount bid far at thè lattar priee «a# aocepted*

Only part of thè

The averagc priee ©f Treasury

bilie of thie eerlee to be issued le 99*989 and thè average rate le atout 0*040
parcant per annua on a tank discount baeie*
393-OhY TRI&SUHY BILLS. MàTORIRG SKFTIMIR 1. 1937
Far thie eerlee, «hi eh «ae far #30,000,000, or thereabout e, tha total aaount
applied fer «ae #138,099,000, of whieh #80,039,000 ime aecepted*

Exoept for one

bid of #3,000, thè aecepted bidè ranged in priee frena 99*940, equlvalent to a
rata ©f atout 0.099 percent per annua, to 99.929, equlvalent to a rate of atout
0.096 pereent per annua, on a tank discount baste.
for at tha lattar priee «ae aecepted.

Only part of tha aaount bid

The average priee of Treasury bilie of

thie eerlee to be leeued le 99.933 and tha average rate le atout 0.088 pereent
per annua on a tank discount baste*

TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Washington
FOR RELEASE, MORNING NEWSPAPERS,
Tuesday, December 1, 1936.____
11/30/36

Press Service
No. 8 - 9 9

Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau announced last evening that the tenders
for two series of Treasury hills, to he dated December 2, 1936, which were offered
on November 27, were opened at the Federal Reserve hanks on Noyemher 30, 1936.
Tenders were invited for the two series to the aggregate amount of
$100,000,000, or thereabouts, and $266,541,000 was applied for, of which
$100,101,000 was accepted.

The details of the two series are as follows:

104-DAY TREASURY BILLS, MATURING MARCH 16, 1937
For this series, which was for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, the total amount
applied for was $138,444,000, of which $50,044,000 was accepted.

The accepted bids

ranged in price from par to 99.986, the latter being equivalent to a rate of about
0.048 percent per annum, on a bank discount basis,
at the latter price was accepted.,

'fcnly part of the amount bid for

The average price of Treasury bills of this

series to be issued is 99,989 and the average rate is about 0..040 percent per
annum on a bank discount basis..
273-DAY TREASURY BILLS, MATURING SEPTEMBER 1., 1937
For this series, which was for $50,000,000, or thereabouts, the total amount
applied for was $128,097,000, of which $50,057,000 was accepted.

Except for one

bid of $5,000, the accepted bids ranged in price from 997940, equivalent to a rate
of about 0.079 percent per annum, to 99.927, equivalent to a rate of about 0.096
percent per annum, on a bank discount basis.
the latter price was accepted.

Only part of the amount bid for at

The average price of Treasury l?ills of this

series to be issued is 99,933 and the average rate is about 0.Ó88 percent per
annum on a bank discount basis.

— >o0o—