View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

5/13/2020

Statement by Secretary Tim Geithner at the International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group Development Committee Meeting

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Press Center

Statement by Secretary Tim Geithner at the International Monetary Fund and World
Bank Group Development Committee Meeting
4/26/2009

TG-103
WASHINGTON -- We meet at an unprecedented time when a severe global economic slowdown threatens to reverse major progress in
poverty reduction. The Multilateral Development Banks, led by the World Bank, have a critical role to play in mitigating the impact of the
financial crisis. These institutions are at the forefront of our efforts to eradicate global poverty and promote balanced, sustainable growth.
We cannot afford to lose time or lose ground.
At the recent London Summit, Leaders supported MDB plans to expand lending to over $300 billion during the next three years. Several of
the MDBs are responding vigorously with higher volumes and new instruments. This includes President Zoellick's plans to provide up to
$100 billion of IBRD funding, the fast tracking of IDA commitments, the IFC's trade finance programs, as well as facilities to support bank
recapitalization and infrastructure financing. Going forward, we encourage the World Bank Group to continue to explore flexible
approaches, such as guarantees, to leverage official and private capital to address development needs.
While most MDBs are focusing on mobilizing existing resources, many have completed or are preparing to launch capital reviews
collectively for the first time. At the London Summit, Leaders affirmed that the MDBs must have adequate resources, and we are
committed to participating actively in their capital resource reviews. These assessments also present a welcome opportunity for all of us,
as shareholders, to engage in a systematic review across the MDBs to ensure not only that they have appropriate levels of resources, but
also to promote fundamental reform. It is also critical that MDB resources are effectively deployed to achieve the maximum impact on
long-term development objectives, including addressing the needs of the poorest. We should ensure that the missions and actions of the
MDBs are clearly defined and coordinated with each other, the IMF, and other public and private donors. Let me highlight a few priority
areas that I believe should underpin such reviews:
First is a commitment to good governance, which is key to institutional effectiveness. This includes efforts to strengthen institutional risk
management capacity and combat fraud and corruption. On this point, I welcome the rigorous implementation of the Volcker Panel
recommendations at the World Bank, and look forward to a similar robust adoption of recommendations of the Thornburgh Group at the
Inter American Development Bank. The internal controls review of IDA highlighted some important areas for improvement on fraud and
corruption controls, and I welcome the World Bank's action plan for addressing these weaknesses.
Second, we should examine the relative roles of the international financial institutions, both in more normal economic circumstances and
in times of crisis. We need a clear division of labor that reflects the comparative strengths of each institution, both in the low income
countries, and in those countries with strong external reserves and more developed financial systems. This will include assessing how
well the MDBs coordinate with each other to address major development priorities, such as the environment. The World Bank Group is
already making an exceptional contribution by leading a coordinated effort through mitigation and adaptation activities to combat the
affects of climate change. We applaud the World Bank Group and our international partners for working together to launch the Climate
Investment Funds, which will make an immediate impact in addressing climate change.
Third, we should evaluate whether each institution has demonstrated flexibility in its balance sheets to address the crisis, and an ability to
leverage both public and private finance. The Asian Development Bank, for example, took steps to maximize its headroom as a part of its
capital increase request, and the IDB has agreed to look at ways to further mobilize its balance sheet as a first step in its capital review.
Fourth, we need to examine the capacity of the MDBs to adapt to change in the needs of its members, to demonstrate an ability to
innovate and a capacity to achieve results. The growing emphasis on results measurement, rather than lending volumes, represents a
commendable and important shift at the MDBs. This focus should continue, even in the face of the crisis, when there is an urgency to get
money out the door, for in a time of limited resources it is important to make sure every dollar counts.

A top priority must also be support for the poorest countries, including fragile and post-conflict countries that will disproportionately feel the
effects of the crisis. Here, a key test for the MDBs is the extent to which those institutions with concessional windows support the poorest.
https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg103.aspx

1/2

5/13/2020

Statement by Secretary Tim Geithner at the International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group Development Committee Meeting

Taking a comprehensive approach to MDB resource reviews, we hope, will create a race to the top in achieving results and moving
successfully through the crisis. But the MDBs cannot do it alone; ultimately, it is the effective implementation of appropriate financial and
economic policies that will determine the scope and pace of recovery among the poorest economies. This must include a commitment to
openness and resisting protectionist measures. The drop in trade flows is leading to precipitous declines in export revenues in developing
countries, and maintaining access to international markets will be key to a balanced, sustainable global recovery. Moreover, as the recent
food crisis made evident, the imposition of trade taxes, quotas and export bans only exacerbated the volatility of commodity prices and
prolonged food shortages.
In short, we have a collective responsibility to act. Now that we have achieved unprecedented agreement on the right strategy and the
right set of tools, we need to keep the pressure on to execute quickly and achieve a lasting, shared recovery. The United States will
sustain action as long as necessary to see growth resume, not just nationally but globally –an objective that is important not just for our
shared prosperity but for our national security. In the United States, we have adopted an ambitious and aggressive policy agenda that will
strengthen our financial system and lay the foundations for economic recovery. This includes the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act to create three to four million jobs and put resources into the hands of consumers and businesses, the Financial Stability Plan to
cleanse and strengthen our financial institutions and restart the flow of credit, and the Making Home Affordable © Plan to address our
housing crisis and help millions of homeowners take advantage of historically low mortgage rates and avoid foreclosure.
Finally, I want to affirm that the United States is on track to meet its Gleneagles Commitments to double Overseas Development
Assistance (ODA) to Sub-Saharan Africa by 2010. U.S. ODA was $7.6 billion in 2008, putting us close to our goal of $8.7 billion by 2010.
At the recent Leaders Summit, President Obama pledged to work with our Congress to provide nearly half a billion dollars in immediate
assistance to vulnerable populations and double support for agricultural development to more than 1 billion dollars in 2010, so that we can
give people the tools they need to lift themselves out of poverty.
We will work with our partners here and across the world on the vital measures that are necessary. As President Obama has said, we live
in a time when our destinies are shared, but will be written by us, not for us.
###

https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg103.aspx

2/2