View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory
Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association February 2, 2021
February 3, 2021

The Committee convened in a closed session via teleconference at 9:00 a.m. All members
were present, except for Christine Hurtsellers. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal
Finance Brian Smith, Director of the O ice of Debt Management Fred Pietrangeli, and Deputy
Director of the O ice of Debt Management Nick Steele welcomed the Committee, including
the newest member to the Committee, Mohit Mittal. Other members of Treasury sta
present were Bobby Bishop, Chris Cameron, Dave Chung, David Copenhaver, Tammy Didier,
Christian Furey, Christine Gra under, Timothy Gribben, Tom Katzenbach, Chris Kubeluis,
David Lebryk, Nellie Liang, Brett Solimine, Renee Tang, Brandon Taylor, Gregory Till, and Tom
Vannoy. Federal Reserve Bank of New York sta members Kyle Lee, Susan McLaughlin,
Linsey Molloy, Rania Perry, Julie Remache, and Nathaniel Wuer el were also present.
Fiscal Assistant Secretary David Lebryk began the discussion and emphasized the
importance of the Committee in providing advice to the Treasury on debt management.
Director Pietrangeli then provided brief highlights of Q1 FY2021 changes in receipts and
outlays. Receipts were largely unchanged, declining by $3 billion (-0.4%) year-over-year.
Outlays increased by $190 billion (17%), largely driven by payments related to the federal
government’s response to the COVID-19 outbreak, including increased unemployment,
Medicare, Medicaid, food stamp, and financial assistance payments. Looking over the next
two quarters, Pietrangeli noted that Treasury’s O ice of Fiscal Projections estimates
privately-held net marketable borrowing of $274 billion and $95 billion, assuming cash
balance of $800 billion for the end of March and $500 billion for the end of June. These
borrowing estimates made no assumptions about future fiscal stimulus and assume coupon
auction sizes remain unchanged.
Pietrangeli highlighted that deficit and privately-held net marketable borrowing projections
by the primary dealers remain elevated with a median deficit estimate of $3.200 trillion for
FY2021 and $1.743 trillion for FY2022. The median estimate for privately-held net
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

1/6

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

marketable borrowing for FY 2021 was $2.600 trillion, which was lower than the deficit
estimate in part due to expectations for Treasury to decrease its cash balance over the
period. Primary dealers included an estimate for FY2021 fiscal stimulus in their deficit and
borrowing estimates, with most dealers anticipating a package of about $1 trillion to be
passed over the next few months. However, primary dealers also expressed uncertainty
around both the size and timing of fiscal stimulus and the continued economic impact of
COVID-19, with some risk that FY2021 borrowing needs could be biased to the upside.
Pietrangeli next discussed the financing gap, commenting that Treasury appears well
financed for FY2021 based on existing coupon auction sizes and the currently elevated cash
balance.
Next, Debt Manager Taylor summarized primary dealer expectations for Treasury issuance
over the coming months. Given the increases in nominal coupon auction sizes introduced
over the course of CY2020, Treasury’s elevated cash balance, and estimates for future fiscal
stimulus, most primary dealers anticipated that Treasury is adequately financed for FY2021.
As such, most primary dealers expected no change to nominal coupon auction sizes for the
upcoming quarter. In addition, primary dealers largely anticipated slight increases in TIPS
issuance sizes in CY2021, in line with the guidance provided at the November refunding.
Debt Manager Katzenbach then reviewed primary dealer views on the pace that Treasury
could decrease bill supply to the Committee’s recommended range of 15-20% of marketable
debt outstanding. Primary dealers prefaced their views on the fiscal outlook but generally
forecasted that the share could reasonably decline below 20% in the next 1-2 years. Within
this context, primary dealers broadly noted that consideration should be given to the
outlook for money market mutual fund assets under management, as well as the availability
of investment substitutes. Some primary dealers suggested that eliminating one or two of
the regular cash management bills could ease the impact of broader reductions in bill
supply.
Next, Deputy Director Steele summarized responses from the primary dealers indicating a
wide range of experience as Treasury market intermediaries in March and April 2020, with
most citing internal risk limits as the primary source of constraints when facilitating the
sudden, unprecedented demands for cash from all counterparty types. External factors were
also cited with a focus on margin requirements, haircuts, and regulatory ratios. In terms of
what could help in the future, the main theme was anything that could improve the flexibility
of dealer balance sheets to better absorb the massive flows that customers abruptly
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

2/6

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

demanded. Some dealers noted that the temporary supplemental leverage ratio (SLR)
exemptions were helpful in subsequent months but that they were not as e ective as they
could have been due to being temporary and not including repo. Other suggestions
included a standing repo facility with broad access or additional central clearing to allow for
more netting down of the balance sheet. While these suggestions were viewed as
potentially beneficial, dealers did not expect them to be su icient to prevent similar
challenges to intermediation in a future crisis.
The Committee then reviewed a presentation on the implications of the current abundant
reserves environment for Treasury issuance. The presenting member highlighted that, as
reserve balances continue to grow over the course of CY2021, given ongoing asset purchases
by the Federal Reserve and an expected drawdown in Treasury’s cash balance, bank deposit
levels will grow and bank demand for Treasury securities should rise. With loan growth
likely to remain low, banks would deploy excess liquidity in Treasury securities, with demand
focused on banks’ preferred habitat in the short and intermediate sectors. However,
increased reserve levels risk constraining bank balance sheet capacity as leverage and
capital ratio thresholds are approached, which could put pressure on the pricing of deposits
and repurchase agreements. Lower bank balance sheet capacity for deposits could result in
additional liquidity flowing into money market mutual funds, further bolstering demand for
short-dated Treasury securities.
Next, the Committee reviewed a presentation on swap spreads and the information they may
provide in understanding government borrowing costs. The presenting member noted that
swap spreads can provide information about Treasury supply e ects, but there are unique
dynamics impacting the relative yield in swaps at di erent times and di erent maturities,
including bank funding costs, regulatory e ects, and idiosyncratic demand dynamics from
di erent investor types. For example, front-end swap spreads have been primarily driven by
bank funding costs. Moreover, narrower long-end swap spreads may indicate long-end
Treasury securities are relatively expensive, but they could also represent a structural
increase in the relative demand from investors to receive fixed rates in long maturity swaps.
The Committee also discussed how regulations have a ected swap spreads, including the
e ects of SLR, making on-balance-sheet holdings of Treasury securities more expensive than
o -balance-sheet swaps. Finally, the presenting member highlighted that as the London
Interbank O ered Rate (LIBOR) transition progresses, liquidity will migrate from LIBOR-based
swaps to swaps linked to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which could
facilitate more direct comparison between Treasury securities and swaps. The Committee
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

3/6

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

noted the widening of swap spreads amid increased coupon supply over the last year
suggests that factors other than Treasury supply may have prevailed recently.
The Committee then turned to its financing recommendation for the upcoming quarters and
recommended that Treasury maintain nominal coupon auction sizes at current levels. The
Committee noted that prior increases to coupon issuance had generated significant
financing capacity and that making no further changes in February would provide the most
flexibility, given the current fiscal uncertainty. The Committee also recommended that
Treasury continue to increase TIPS auction sizes at a pace consistent with the $10-20 billion
increase in gross issuance for CY2021 that was forecast at the November 2020 refunding.
The Committee adjourned at 1:15 p.m.
The Committee reconvened at 4:30 p.m. The Chair reviewed recent Committee
recommendations, summarized key elements of the Committee report for Secretary Yellen,
and followed with a brief discussion of recent market developments.
The Committee adjourned at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________________
Brian Smith
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Finance
United States Department of the Treasury
February 2, 2021
Certified by:
_________________________________
Elizabeth Hammack, Chair
Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee
Of The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
February 2, 2021

TREASURY B ORROW ING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
QUARTERLY MEETING
COMMITTEE CHARGE – F EB RUARY 2, 2021
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

4/6

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

Fiscal Outlook
Taking into consideration Treasury’s short, intermediate, and long-term financing
requirements, as well as the variability in financing needs from quarter to quarter, what
changes, if any, do you recommend to Treasury issuance? Please also provide perspectives
regarding market expectations for Treasury issuance, the e ects of SOMA investments, the
evolution of Treasury holdings by di erent types of investors, as well as auction calendar
construction.

Abundant Reserves
What are the implications of the current abundant reserve environment for Treasury
issuance? Are there significant di erences between the current abundant reserve
environment compared to previous periods of abundant reserves that Treasury should
consider? How does an abundant reserve environment a ect private demand for Treasuries
at di erent maturities?

Swap Spreads
Discuss the movements in swap spreads in both recent months as well as the long-term.
What are the benefits and limitations of comparing fixed rates on fixed-to-float interest rates
swaps to interest rates on Treasury securities? To what extent can swap spreads provide
relevant context for understanding government borrowing costs? What types of interest rate
swaps are most relevant for comparison across Treasury maturities and security types? How
do the demand dynamics for interest rate swaps di er from that of Treasury securities and
what are the di erences in the investor base for each product? How does the transition
away from LIBOR a ect the information content derived from swap spreads?

Financing this Quarter
We would like the Committee’s advice on the following:
The composition of Treasury notes and bonds to refund approximately $62.9 billion of
privately-held notes and bonds maturing on February 15, 2021.
The composition of Treasury marketable financing for the remainder of the JanuaryMarch 2021 quarter.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

5/6

2/3/2021

Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets …

The composition of Treasury marketable financing for the April-June 2021 quarter.

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0017

6/6