View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

January 2004

U.S. Department of Labor


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Bureau o f Labor Statistics

U.S. Department of Labor
Elaine L. Chao, Secretary
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Kathleen P. Utgoff, Commissioner
The Monthly Labor Review ( usps 987-800) is published
monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.
Department of Labor. The Review welcomes articles on the
labor force, labor-m anagem ent relations, business
conditions, industry productivity, com pensation,
occupational safety and health, demographic trends, and
other economic developments. Papers should be factual
and analytical, not polemical in tone. Potential articles, as
well as communications on editorial matters, should be
submitted to:
Editor-in-Chief
Monthly Labor Review
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Washington, dc 20212
Telephone: (202) 691-5900
E-mail: mlr@bls.gov
Inquiries on subscriptions and circulation, including address
changes, should be sent to: Superintendent of Documents
Government Printing Office Washington, dc 20402
Telephone: (202) 512-1800
Subscription price per year—$49 domestic; $68.60 foreign.
Single copy—$15 domestic; $21 foreign. Make checks
payable to the Superintendent of Documents.
Subscription prices and distribution policies for the Monthly
Labor Review ( issn 0098-1818) and other government
publications are set by the Government Printing Office, an
agency of the U.S. Congress.
The Secretary of Labor has determined that the publication of
this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public
business required by law of this Department. Periodicals
postage paid at Washington, dc, and at additional mailing
addresses.
Unless stated otherwise, articles appearing in this
publication are in the public domain and may be reprinted
without express permission from the Editor-in-Chief. Please
cite the specific issue of the Monthly Labor Review as the
source.
Information is available to sensory impaired individuals
upon request:
Voice phone: (202) 691-5200
Federal Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339.
P ostmaster :
Send address changes to Monthly Labor
Review, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, dc
20402-0001.

Cover designed by Keith Tapscott


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

MONTHLY LABOR

REVIEW
Volume 127, Number 1
January 2004

Changes in State laws during 2003:
Labor
Revised or enacted laws covered minimum wage rates, child labor, employment
discrimination, crime victim protection and military re-employment rights
Richard R. Nelson and John J. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Workers’ compensation
Various States enacted new laws or revised legislation
designed to further define coverage and services
Glenn Whittington

Unemployment insurance
Many States increased their maximum weekly benefit amounts;
three Federal enactments affected State unemployment insurance
Loryn Lancaster

Departments
Labor month in review
Précis
Book review
Current labor statistics

Editor-in-Chief: Deborah P. Klein • Executive Editor: Richard M. Devens • Managing Editor: Anna Huffman Hill • Editors. Brian
I. Baker, Richard Hamilton, Leslie Brown Joyner • Book Reviews: Richard Hamilton • Design and Layout: Catherine D. Bowman,
Edith W. Peters •


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Contributor: Keven Skelly

Labor Month in Review

The January Review
For the past quarter-century, Monthly
Labor Review has benefited from Richard
R. N elson’s concise summaries o f State
labor legislation . W hile the overall
structure of Federal labor law touches and
influences all the States, labor lawyers,
labor relations practitioners, labor union
officials, and labor economists have come
to realize that it is the diversity across
S tates that often lends nuance and
substance to their work. We all thank
Richard N elson for the contribution he
has made to that work over the years. It
is thus with sincere good w ishes (and
som e trepidation) that w e send him off
on the retirem ent from governm ent
service that he announced during the
editorial process o f this year’s article.
N elson and his co-author, John J.
Fitzpatrick, Jr., chronicle the wide sweep
o f labor legislation that was enacted in a
busier year in the Statehouses than has
been the experience recently in the field
o f labor law. It is a sign o f the times that
one o f the more frequent categories of
legislation was the delineation o f re­
employment rights for National Guard and
other personnel called to active duty.
Glenn Whittington, another long-time
contributor, sum m arizes changes in
workers’ compensation law enacted in
2003. Again, the interesting parts are the
changes at a very fine-grained level: one
State imposes a new limit on a class of
treatments while another increases the
number o f such treatments allowed. In at
least one case, chiropractic treatments in
California and Florida, both the limiting
State and the liberalizing State end up at
the same number o f authorized treatments.
It is perhaps a more depressing sign of
the times that in the first two States in the
report, the fines for avoiding provision of
workers’ compensation on the part of
employers or for defrauding the system
on the part o f em p loyees had to be
substantially increased.
Loryn Lancaster, a relatively recent
ad d ition to our group o f regulars,
sum m arizes ch an ges in the area o f
2

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

unemployment insurance. In this case,
many of the important changes are at the
federal level. There were two extensions of
the Temporary Extended Unemployment
Com pensation program and, in y e t
an oth er sig n o f h o w tim e s h a v e
ch an ged , the D epartm ent o f Labor
issu e d fin a l reg u la tio n s cla rify in g
eligibility o f unemployment benefits as
a direct result o f a major disaster.
The issue also includes a book review,

M ay the B est Team Win: Baseball
Economics and Public Policy, prepared
by Kevin Skelly o f the Bureau’s New York
region. Readers should know that MLR
accepts submissions for the book review
section as well as articles from outside
authors. For more details, contact us at
mlr@bls.gov

One in nine had some
unem ploym ent in 2002
In 2 0 0 2 , the “ w o r k -e x p e r ie n c e
unemployment rate” for all workers—
defined as the number unemployed at
so m e tim e d uring the y ea r as a
proportion o f the number who worked
or looked for work at any time during
the year— rose by 0.6 percentage point
to 11.0 percent. At that level, the “workexperience unemployment rate” for all
workers was the highest it has been
since 1996, when it was 11.7 percent.
C o n v e rse ly , the p rop ortion o f the
population that worked at som e point
during 2 0 0 2 w as 6 8 .4 p ercent, 0 .9
percentage point below its 2001 level.

Increase in
volunteering
Both the number o f volunteers and the
volunteer rate rose over the year ended
in September 2003. About 63.8 million
people did volunteer work at some point
from September 2002 to September 2003,
up 59.8 m illion from the previous 12month period. The volunteer rate grew
to 28.8 percent, up from 2 7 .4 percent.

January 2004

About 25.1 percent o f men and 32.2
percent o f women did volunteer work in
the year ended in Septem ber 2 0 0 3 ,
increases of 1.5 and 1.2 percentage points
from 2002, respectively. For teenagers, the
volunteer rate jumped by 2.6 percentage
points to 29.5 percent.
Volunteers spent a median o f 52 hours
on volunteer activities during the period
from September 2002 to September 2003.
Among the age groups, volunteers age
65 and older devoted the most time— a
m ed ian o f 88 hours— to v o lu n teer
activities. Those age 25 to 34 years spent
the least time, volunteering a median of 36
hours during the year. Find out more in
“Volunteering in the United States, 2003”
news release USDL 03-888.

Work injuries and
illnesses in 2002
A total of 4.7 million nonfatal injuries and
illnesses were reported in private industry
workplaces during 2002, resulting in a rate
of 5.3 cases per 100 equivalent full-time
w orkers. A m on g g o o d s-p ro d u cin g
industry divisions, incidence rates during
2002 ranged from 4.0 cases per 100 full­
time workers in mining to 7.2 cases per 100
full-time workers in manufacturing. Within
the service-producing sector, incidence
rates ranged from 1.7 cases per 100 full­
time workers in finance, insurance, and real
estate to 6.1 cases per 100 full-time workers
in transportation and public utilities.
Approximately 2.5 million injuries and
illnesses were cases with days away from
work, job transfer, or restriction; that is,
they required recuperation away from
work, transfer to another job, restricted
duties at work, or a com bination o f
th ese a c tio n s. The rem a in in g 2 .2
m illio n injuries and illn e sse s w ere
other recordable ca ses that did not
result in tim e away from work. The
in cid en ce rate for ca se s w ith days
away from work, job transfer, or restriction
was 2.8 cases per 100 workers. See
“W orkplace Injuries and Illnesses in
2002,” news release USDL 03-913.
□

State Labor Laws, 2003

State labor legislation
enacted in 2003
Minimum wage rates, child labor, employment discrimination,
crime victim protection, and military re-employment rights
were among major legislation enacted
or revised during the year
Richard R. Nelson
and
John J. Fitzpatrick, Jr,
greater volum e o f labor legislation was enacted in
2003 than in recent years, despite the fact that budget
concerns were a priority for many States.1 California,
Illinois, and Texas enacted particularly large numbers o f laws.
Legislation enacted addressed several areas of employment
standards and included many important measures: increased
minimum wage rates; expanded coverage of family and medi­
cal leave laws; additional prohibitions on children working in
hazardous occupations; and new measures addressing work­

A

place security.
A dditional States provided leave for em ployees w ho are
crim e victim s; protected the earnings o f children w orking in
the entertainm ent industry; eased regulation o f the private
em ploym ent agency industry; and protected the jobs o f re­
serve and guard m em bers returning from m ilitary active duty.
N ew protections from discrimination were enacted for
transgender individuals, prohibitions were enacted on the
purchase o f goods produced through forced labor, and a Cali­
fornia law requires employers to provide healthcare benefits.
This article summarizes significant State labor legislation
enacted in 2003. It does not, however, cover legislation on
occupational safety and health, employment and training, la­
bor relations, em ployee background clearance, econom ic de­
velopment, and local living wage ordinances. Articles re­
porting on changes in unemployment insurance and workers’
com pensation laws appear separately in this issue.

Richard R. Nelson and John J. Fitzpatrick, Jr. are State Standards
Advisors in the Division of External Affairs, Wage and Hour
D iv isio n , E m p lo y m en t S tan d a rd s A d m in is tra tio n , U .S .
Department of Labor.
E-mail: Fitzpatrickjr.john@dol.gov


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Wages. Minimum wage rates increased as the result o f new
legislation in Illinois, N ew Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont;
as a result o f previous laws in Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii,
and Maine; and as a result o f prior ballot measures in Oregon
and Washington. In Alaska, a 2002 enactment that provided
for indexed rate increases was repealed.
A s o f January 1, 2004, minimum wage rates were higher
than the Federal standard in Alaska, California, Connecticut,
Delaware, the District o f Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine,
Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wash­
ington. O f the 43 States with minimum wage laws, only 2 have
rates lower than the Federal rate o f $5.15 per hour.2
Santa Fe, N ew M exico, and San Francisco, California,
adopted local minimum wage ordinances. Conversely, a new
Texas law provides that State law supersedes a wage estab­
lished in an ordinance, and, in Florida, political subdivisions
are barred from establishing, or otherwise requiring an em ­
ployer to pay a minimum wage, other than a Federal minimum
wage, or applying a Federal minimum wage to those wages
exempt from Federal coverage.
Enactments in Utah and Vermont changed the amount of
the tip credit authorized for employers to m eet a portion o f the
minimum wage.
New minimum wage and overtime law exemptions were en­
acted in Arkansas and Montana, and a new overtime exem p­
tion was enacted in Alaska.
A Maine law permits State em ployees to be awarded com ­
pensatory time in lieu o f overtime pay.
Prevailing wage laws pertaining to public works construc­
tion projects currently exist in 32 States and the Federal G ov­
ernment.3 This year, as usual, a m ix o f laws was enacted, with
some strengthening and with others weakening existing laws.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

3

State Labor Laws, 2003

The threshold amount for coverage was increased by leg­
islation in Maine and administratively in Ohio and Wisconsin.
Exemptions from coverage were enacted in Montana and Or­
egon, while law coverage was expanded in California, Illinois,
Nevada, and N ew Jersey.
The Montana law was amended to require that additional
trades be included in the prevailing wage survey, and the
Washington Department o f Labor is to establish a goal of
conducting surveys for each trade every 3 years.
Am ong other developments, primary contractors are to be
identified in Alaska; new recordkeeping requirements were
enacted in Illinois; penalties for violation o f prevailing wage
laws were increased in Nevada and revised in California; and
the Maryland Advisory Council on Prevailing Wage Rates
was abolished. Contractors in California may now bring court
action to recover increased labor costs in certain circum­
stances.
In Illinois, an Executive order requires State agencies to
consider project labor agreements for public works projects.
An Executive order issued in Michigan permits the debarment
o f a contractor who has violated any State or Federal law.
A m ong several changes to the Colorado wage payment
law, the State and its agencies were exempted from coverage.
Several classifications o f em ployees were exempted from cov­
erage o f the W isconsin law. Payment o f wages by direct de­
posit was authorized in Arkansas and Texas, and the North
Dakota provision was amended. The Maryland Advisory
Committee on the Wage and Hour Law was abolished.
Civil penalties for failure to pay wages increased in Califor­
nia. The Nevada, Oklahoma, and Tennessee penalty provi­
sions were revised.
Coverage o f the wage payment law was expanded in Kan­
sas. California enacted wage protections for workers in the
car wash industry.
N ew payroll deductions were authorized in Maryland,
North Carolina, and Texas. Payment into a trust account was
approved in Virginia.
It was specified that the Nevada labor commissioner is to
enforce all labor laws without regard to whether an em ployee
is lawfully or unlawfully employed.

Hours. Despite several bills introduced on the subject, no
new legislation was enacted this year regulating mandatory
overtime. A committee established in Louisiana w ill assess
the extent o f registered nurse mandatory overtime use.
An Arkansas statute limiting work hours in saw and plan­
ing m ills was repealed, and changes were made in the West
Virginia law regulating passenger motor carriers.
Certain exceptions were authorized from the meal period
provision in California, and in the rest and meal period provi­
sions in Washington.

4

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

Family issues. In a continuing expansion o f benefits and
rights under family and medical leave laws, the Connecticut
law was amended to require employers to permit em ployees
the use o f up to 2 weeks o f sick leave to attend to a serious
health condition o f a family member, or for the birth or adop­
tion o f a child. In Hawaii, em ployees in the public sector w ill
again be covered under the State Family and M edical Leave
Act. Additionally, public sector em ployees are now entitled
to at least 4 hours o f paid leave per calendar year to attend
parent-teacher conferences.
Illinois enacted a law requiring certain employers to pro­
vide unpaid leave for an employee victim o f domestic or sexual
violence, or one who has a victim ized family or household
member. Oregon employers with six or more em ployees must
provide leave to attend criminal proceedings for eligible em ­
ployees who have been crime victims or who have an immedi­
ate family member who has been a crime victim. A similar law
enacted in California also extends protection to registered
domestic partners o f victims. Texas will provide limited com ­
pensation to a family member o f a deceased violent crime vic­
tim to attend the funeral, or for lost compensation, resulting
from bereavement leave.
Rhode Island employers may provide unpaid breaks for
nursing mothers, while a W yoming resolution encourages
breastfeeding and commends employers who make accom ­
modations.

Health insurance. A California law requires that employees of
large and medium-sized employers receive healthcare benefits.

Child labor. A trend continued with Minnesota exempting
children working as referees, umpires, or officials from the
minimum age requirement o f the child labor law, while Virginia
lowered the minimum age for referees from 13 to 12. Hours
and night work changes were enacted in Hawaii, Louisiana,
and N ew York, while Maine revised its hazardous occupation
orders concerning confined spaces and heights. Hawaii also
prohibited employment in the adult entertainment industry.
Indiana now requires that minors be accompanied by an adult
for work after 10 p.m. Civil penalty assessment procedures
were revised in Tennessee.
Louisiana employers are no longer required to keep work
permits on file. In addition, employment certificates are to be
submitted electronically by school superintendents.
Laws providing for judicial approval o f artistic contracts o f
minors and requiring that a percentage o f earnings be set
aside in trust were enacted in Nevada, N ew York, North Caro­
lina, and Tennessee, and amended in California.

Industrial homework. California changed the procedures for
the disposition o f articles or materials unlawfully manufac-

tured at home, while adding an appeal process for the confis­
cation and disposition o f the goods.

public safety officer photographs; and in Virginia for nursing

Equal employment opportunity. An Illinois Civil Rights Act

Workplace violence!security. A growing body o f legislation

o f 2003 bars any public-sector employer from discriminating
on the basis o f race, color, or national origin. An Executive
order issued in Arizona prohibits State entities from discrimi­
nating on the basis o f sexual orientation, and N ew M exico
now bans employment discrimination based on sexual orien­
tation and gender identity. Gender identity discrimination is
also now prohibited in California and in Pennsylvania for State
agencies. An Executive order issued in Kansas requires State
agencies to adopt policy statements prohibiting sexual ha­
rassment. California law was amended to hold employers po­
tentially liable for sexual harassment o f workers by clients,
customers, and other third parties. California also prohibited
State agencies from contracting with companies that discrimi­
nate against domestic partners in the provision of benefits.
Among other measures that were enacted relating to vari­
ous forms o f employment discrimination, Illinois employers of
four or more em ployees are prohibited from wage discrimina­
tion based upon sex. Illinois also w ill now prohibit employers
from placing native language restrictions on em ployees dur­
ing non-job-related activities. Vermont revised mandatory
retirement age limits for State Supreme Court justices, and
W yoming removed the upper age limit for age discrimination
protection. Training w ill be required for certain State employ­
ees on disability em ployment law in California, and on State
and Federal discrimination laws and investigation techniques

is being enacted addressing issues o f workplace violence and
security. Background checks for workers in various sensitive
positions were enacted in 2003 in North Dakota, Texas, Utah,

in Connecticut.
The Florida Attorney General may now bring civil action
for damages, and school districts in South Dakota may con­
sider the sex o f an em ployee for employment duties in locker
rooms.

Worker privacy. Over the last few years, several States have
adopted legislation providing immunity from civil liability to
em ployers who furnish information about a current or former
em ployee’s job performance to a prospective or current em ­
ployer. N ew measures were adopted in Louisiana and in Utah
for law enforcement employers. A similar law in Montana was
repealed. Provision was also made for the disclosure, under
certain circumstances, o f peace officer records in California,
and Indiana public em ployee disciplinary action records.
Laws were enacted providing for the confidentiality of
em ployee information in Arkansas for non-elected municipal
and county officials; in Florida concerning em ployee assis­
tance information o f public employees; in Louisiana for direct
deposit payroll information and medical records; in North
Dakota for mediation records; in Ohio for firefighter and emer­
gency m edical technician personnel records; in Oregon for


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

facility staff records and reports.

and Virginia.

Employee leasing. Arkansas repealed its Em ployee Leasing
Act and replaced it with a comprehensive Professional Em ­
ployer Organization Recognition and Licensing Act. Profes­
sional employer organizations in Utah w ill now be required to
register annually rather than be licensed, and the Montana
law was amended to add an exemption for certain arrange­
ments by healthcare facilities.

Private employment agencies. The trend o f easing regula­
tion o f the industry continued this year with Maryland elim i­
nating the licensing and regulation o f employment agencies
and em ployment counselors; Minnesota repealing the law
regulating and requiring licensing o f entertainment agencies;
with Louisiana and North Dakota no longer requiring licens­
ing o f employer-fee-paid employment services; and with Or­
egon excluding em ployment listing services from coverage.
The North Carolina Commissioner o f Labor now has the
authority to enforce the law dealing with the personal service
industry.
In Illinois, employers are now prohibited from knowingly
contracting with day and temporary labor service agencies to
provide replacements for striking or locked out workers.

Whistleblowers. A W histleblower Act, applicable to privatesector employers, was enacted in Illinois, protecting em ploy­
ees from retaliation for disclosing information about employer
violations of State or Federal laws, rules, or regulations. An
Executive order was issued providing similar protection for
State agency em ployees.
Arkansas, California, and Oklahoma expanded the scope
o f their whistleblower protection acts.

Military re-employment rights. Continuing the trend that
began follow ing the events o f September 11, 2001, and the
ensuing military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, several ad­
ditional jurisdictions enacted legislation related to reinstate­
ment rights o f reserve or guard members returning from active
duty. Many of these measures amended laws to provide guard
members with the same rights as provided to those called for
Federal duty. Some o f the measures provide for supplemental
pay or continuation o f health benefits w hile an individual is
on military leave.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

5

State Labor Laws, 2003

Smte labor departments. In Michigan, the name o f the Depart­
ment of Consumer and Industry Services was changed to the
Department o f Labor and Economic Growth, and a new Wage
and Hour Division was created within the department. In Idaho,
the Disability Determinations Service was transferred from the
Executive Office o f the Governor to the Department of Labor.
The Utah Labor Commission is to assume certain coal mine
regulatory functions previously performed by the Labor
Comm ission’s Safety Division.
The Maryland Commissioner of Labor and Industry may now
charge a fee to cover the cost of providing mediation services.

Other laws. Among other laws enacted, Arkansas and Iowa
w ill provide employment leave for State em ployees to serve
as bone marrow or organ donors. The Arkansas law also
applies to public school employees. Hawaii joins several other
States by now providing for paid leave for American Red
Cross disaster volunteers. A M ississippi measure creates a
program o f paid educational leave for hospital em ployees.
A California measure permits em ployees to sue their em ­
ployers for violations o f the State labor code. A Minnesota
law permits civil actions against the State to be brought in
Federal court by current, former, or prospective em ployees o f
the State who are aggrieved by the State’s violation o f vari­
ous Federal laws.

A labam a
Other laws. The law allowing persons who
are regularly employed by the State to engage
in employment in the private sector—if the
employment is not specifically prohibited by
statute, and there is no conflict with the job
of the State employee—was amended to limit
this authorization to those employees whose
pay is $75,000 or less exclusive of benefits.
In addition, the law provides that no em­
ployee is to engage in employment in the pri­
vate sector during their scheduled working
hours. The entity that employed the State
employee may not do business with or be
employed by the department that employs
the State employee.

Alaska
Wages. As the result of prior legislation, the
State minimum wage rate rose to $7.15 per
hour, from $5.65, on January 1, 2003.
The minimum wage law was amended to
eliminate a provision enacted in 2002 that
would have required annual adjustments to
the minimum wage rate based on the rate of
inflation. The first indexed rate would have
become effective on January 1,2004.
The section of law requiring the pay­
ment of overtime was amended to provide

6

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Idaho adopted a Voluntary Contributions Act regulating
political contributions by labor organizations.
A law enacted in Tennessee prohibits the termination o f an
employee who is a volunteer firefighter if his or her absence or
lateness to work is due to responding to an emergency. Illi­
nois made it unlawful to use a false academic degree for the
purpose o f obtaining employment.
Application o f the N ew York anti-sweatshop laws were
expanded to allow public schools and colleges in the State to
consider labor standards when evaluating bids for sports
equipment. An Illinois State Prohibition o f Goods from Forced
Labor Act provides that each contract entered into by a State
agency for the procurement o f equipment, materials, or sup­
plies must specify that foreign-made goods produced under
the contract were not produced in whole or in part by forced,
convict, or indentured labor. A similar law was enacted in
California. A lso, California made it unlawful to enter into a
contract for labor or services with a construction, farm labor,
garment, janitorial, or security guard contractor, if it is known
that the contract does not provide sufficient funds to permit
compliance with all applicable laws. Texas made it unlawful to
traffic another person with the intent that the trafficked per­
son engage in forced labor or services.
The following is a summary, by jurisdiction, o f labor legis­
lation enacted in 2003.

that it applies to all claims for overtime than weekly. By July 1, 2004, the Depart­
based on employment on and after July 1, ment of Labor and Workforce Development
1990, and before June 2, 1999, and to all is to provide for filing these reports by se­
pending administrative and judicial actions cure online electronic filing.
that are based on the calculation of over­
Before commencing work on a public
time for employment during that time pe­ construction contract, the person entering
riod. The requirement for the payment of into the contract with a contracting agency
overtime at the rate of one and one-half is to designate a primary contractor who
times the regular rate of pay for hours
must file a notice of work with the Depart­
worked in excess of 8 hours a day and 40 ment of Labor and Workforce Development.
hours a week had been invalidated by a The notice of work must list work to be
court decision and then reenacted in 1999. performed under the public construction
In determining whether an employee has contract by each contractor who will per­
worked more than 40 hours a week, the
form any portion of work on the contract
num ber of hours worked is calculated
and the contract price being paid to each
without including those hours worked in contractor. The primary contractor must
excess of 8 a day, because the employee is pay all filing fees for each contractor per­
paid overtime compensation separately, forming work on the contract, including a
based on those hours.
filing fee based on the contract price being
The overtime pay requirements of the paid for work performed by the primary
minimum wage law were amended to exempt contractor’s employees. Upon completion
from coverage work performed by flight crew of all work on the contract, the primary con­
members employed by air carriers subject to tractor must file with the department a no­
the Federal Railway Labor Act. Flight crew tice of completion together with payment
is defined as the pilot, co-pilot, flight engi­ of any additional filing fees owed due to in­
neer, and flight attendants.
creased contract amounts. Within 30 days
The submission of payroll information after the department’s receipt of the notice
by contractors and subcontractors perform­ of completion, the department is to inform
ing work on a public construction contract is the contracting agency of the amount, if any,
now to be made every second week rather to be withheld from the final payment.

January 2004

Inmate labor. A Correctional Industries Pro­
gram Act of 2003 was adopted. This Act
allows the administrative costs of the Cor­
rectional Industries Program, including em­
ployee salaries and benefits, to be paid from
product revenues obtained from the correc­
tional industries fund rather than the General
Fund.
Other laws. The Governor, through the issu­
ance of an administrative order, may autho­
rize State employees who are members of a
reserve or auxiliary component of the armed
forces of the United States— including the
organized militia of Alaska, consisting of the
Alaska National Guard, the Alaska Naval Mi­
litia, and the Alaska State Defense Force—
and who are called to active duty by the ap­
propriate State or Federal authority to con­
tinue to receive the equivalent of their State
compensation and some or all of their State
benefits. Benefits include credited service in
a State retirement system, membership in the
supplemental employee benefits system, and
group life and health insurance provided un­
der State law or under a collective bargaining
agreement.

Arizona
Equal employment opportunity. The Gover­
nor issued an Executive order directing that
no State agency, board or commission is to
discriminate in employment solely on the
basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, and
providing that notice is to be given to all State
employees that acts of sexual harassment or
other harassment based on sexual orientation
will be a cause for discipline, up to and in­
cluding termination of employment with the
State. No State agency will be required to
establish employment goals based on sexual
orientation.
Other laws. A resolution was adopted urging
the U.S. Congress to enact legislation that
would establish a legal worker program for
immigrants who enter the United States
through ports of entry, including regulations
that require employers to pay minimum
wages to these workers; that require the
workers to pay payroll taxes; that protect
the workers from exploitation; and that al­
low the workers to be eligible for employeroffered health insurance.

Arkansas
Wages. The minimum wage law was amended
to exempt from coverage nonprofit child wel­
fare agency em ployees who serve as
houseparents who are directly involved in
caring for children residing in residential fa­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

cilities of the nonprofit welfare agency, and
who are orphans, in foster care, abused, ne­
glected, abandoned, homeless, in need of su­
pervision, or otherwise in crisis situations
that lead to out-of-home placements; and
who are compensated at an annual rate of not
less than $13,000, or at an annual rate of not
less than $10,000 if the employee resides in
the residential facility and receives board and
lodging at no cost.
Employers may now pay workers by
electronic direct deposit into the employee’s
account in addition to payment in currency
or by check as before. The employee may
opt out of electronic direct deposit by pro­
viding the employer a written statement re­
questing payment by check. An employee
has a right to be paid in currency if the em­
ployer has ever paid the employee with a
check drawn on an account with insufficient
funds.

employer organization and the recipient. The
license application is to include the name and
address of the organization, a taxpayer or
employer identification number, a statement
of ownership, a statement of business expe­
rience, and a financial statement. Workers’
compensation coverage is required.
W histleblower. The scope of the State
Whistle-Blower Act, which protects public
employees from adverse action for report­
ing, in good faith to an appropriate author­
ity, the existence of waste of public funds,
property, or manpower, or the violation of
any State law, rule or regulation was ex­
panded to also protect disclosures concern­
ing waste of Federal funds, property, or
manpower administered or controlled by a
public employer.

Other laws. A law was enacted providing
employment leave for State employees or
Hours. The statute that had restricted work public school employees to serve as bone
hours in saw and planning mills to 10 hours a marrow or organ donors. These employees
are entitled to no more than seven days of
day was repealed.
leave to serve as a bone marrow donor and no
Child labor. The law making it unlawful for more than thirty days of leave to serve as an
any wholesaler, retailer, or transporter of alco­ organ donor in any calendar year. In order to
holic beverages to allow any employee or any receive the leave they must; 1) request the
other person under 21 years of age to sell, leave in writing; 2) provide the employing
transport or handle alcoholic beverages was agency written verification by the physician
amended to allow persons 19 years of age and who is to perform the transplant that the
older, with written consent of a parent or guard­ employee is to serve as a human organ or
ian, to serve and handle alcoholic beverages at bone marrow donor; and 3) provide the em­
on-premises consumption outlets where food ploying agency written verification by the
physician performing the transplant that the
service is a permit requirement.
employee did serve as a human organ or bone
Worker privacy. The law exempting the marrow donor. The State or public school
home addresses of non-elected State employ­ employee may use the leave without loss or
ees, contained in employer records, from reduction in pay, leave, or credit for time of
being considered public records under the service. A State agency or public school may
Arkansas Freedom of Information Act was not penalize an employee for requesting or
expanded to also apply to the home ad­ obtaining this leave.
An archaic statute was repealed that had
dresses of non-elected municipal and county
made it unlawful for the person in control of
employees.
any establishment where three or more per­
Employee leasing. The Arkansas Employee sons are employed, and where any of the
Leasing Act was repealed, and a comprehen­ employees are women, to permit in the work­
sive Arkansas Professional Employer Orga­ place any influence, practices, or conditions
nization Recognition and Licensing Act was calculated to injuriously affect the morals of
enacted. “Professional employer organiza­ the female employees.
tion” is defined as any person engaged in the
business of providing the service of entering California
into a co-employment relationship in which
at least a majority of the employees provid­ Wages. Voters in the City of San Francisco
ing services to a client or to a division or approved an ordinance, effective January 1,
work unit of a client are covered employees 2004, that requires most employers to pay a
and in which the arrangement is intended to minimum wage of $8.50 per hour for work
be, or is, ongoing rather than temporary in performed within the city to those employ­
nature— and employer responsibilities, in­ ees who work two or more hours per week.
cluding the right of direction and control of The wage will be adjusted effective January
1st of each year based on increases in the
the employees, are shared by the professional

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

7

State Labor Laws, 2003

Consumer Price Index for urban wage earn­
ers and clerical workers for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, California, metro­
politan statistical area. The wage require­
ment will not apply to businesses with fewer
than 10 employees or non-profits until Janu­
ary 1, 2005. Starting on that date, those
small businesses and non-profits would pay
a minimum wage of $7.75 per hour. Effec­
tive January 1, 2006, all small businesses
and non-profits would pay the minimum
wage of $8.50 per hour as adjusted based on
the indexed increases. Employees who as­
sert their rights to receive the minimum wage
will be protected from retaliation.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
permit contractors to bring court action to
recover increased labor costs, penalties, and
legal fees from an awarding body if 1) the
awarding body has told the contractor in
writing that the work to be covered by the
bid was not a “public work,” or 2) the award­
ing body received actual written notice from
the Department of Industrial Relations that
the work to be covered by the bid or contract
is a “public work” and failed to disclose that
information to the contractor before the bid
opening or awarding of the contract. Addi­
tionally, the law now permits the contractor
to recover increased costs from an awarding
body that result from the classification of
the work as a “public work” after the job has
begun, or the awarding body accepted the
co n tractor’s bid, or the contractor was
awarded the contract in circumstances where
no bid was solicited. “Awarding body” for
purposes of applicability excludes the De­
partment of General Services, the Depart­
ment of Transportation, and the Department
of Water Resources.
The prevailing wage law was amended so
that required per diem wages now include
employer payments for worker protection
and assistance programs or committees es­
tablished under the Federal Labor Manage­
ment Cooperation Act of 1978, to the extent
that the activities of the programs or com­
mittees are directed to the monitoring and
enforcement of laws related to public works.
Additionally, per diem wages also include
industry advancement and collective bargain­
ing agreement administrative fees, provided
that these payments are required under a col­
lective bargaining agreement pertaining to the
particular craft, classification, or type of
work within the locality or the nearest labor
market area at issue.
If the State or a political subdivision
thereof agrees by contract with a private en­
tity that the private entity’s employees re­
ceive, in performing that contract, the gen­
eral prevailing rate of per diem wages and the

8

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

general prevailing rate for holiday and over­
time work, the Director of Industrial Rela­
tions, upon a request by the State or the
political subdivision, is to determine the
wage rates for each craft, classification, or
type of worker that is needed to execute the
contract, and provide these wage rates to the
entity requesting them.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
provide that employers may take credit for
employer payments to pension plans or
other contributions against their prevailing
wage obligation, even if the payments are
not made during the same pay period for
which credit is claimed, as long as the em­
ployer regularly makes the contributions, or
regularly pays the costs, for the plan, fund,
or program on no less than a quarterly basis.
The information that the Contractor’s
State License Board is required to post on
the Internet concerning the status of licens­
ees is now to include information regarding a
licensee’s willful or deliberate violation of
the Labor Code. The Labor Commissioner
is to maintain a quarterly updated list of con­
tractors and subcontractors who were found
to have willfully violated the prevailing wage
law or to whom a final order has been issued.
Interest will accrue, from the date the wages
were due and payable, on all due and unpaid
wages. Additionally, the violator will pay a
penalty of not less than $ 10 per day for each
employee paid less than the prevailing
wage—unless the failure to pay the prevail­
ing wage was a good-faith mistake that was
promptly and voluntarily corrected. The
penalty will not be less than $20 per day if
the violator was assessed penalties within
the 3 previous years for prevailing wage vio­
lations, and it will not be less than $30 per
day if the Labor Commissioner determines
that the violation was willful. The maximum
penalty remains at $50 per worker for each
day of violations. Back wage claims against
the contractor must be satisfied before funds
surrendered by the contractor may be ap­
plied to imposed penalties.
A resolution was adopted reaffirming the
intent of the legislature for the State prevail­
ing wage law to apply broadly to all projects
subsidized with public funds, including the
projects of chartered cities.
A Labor Code Private Attorneys General
Act of 2004 was enacted. Under this law,
any provision of the Labor Code that pro­
vides for a civil penalty to be assessed and
collected by the Labor and Workforce De­
velopment Agency or any of its depart­
ments, divisions, commissions, boards, agen­
cies, or employees, for a violation of the
code, may as an alternative, be recovered
through a civil action brought by an aggrieved

January 2004

employee on behalf of himself or herself and
other current or former employees. Any
employee who prevails in any action will be
entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s
fees and costs. A civil penalty is established
where one is not specifically provided under
the Labor Code. An action may not be main­
tained if the agency or any of its depart­
ments, divisions, commissions, boards, agen­
cies, or employees has cited a person for the
same violation that the aggrieved employee
is attempting to recover a civil penalty. A
civil penalty will not be awarded if the al­
leged violation is a failure to act by the Labor
and Workplace Development agency.
Civil penalties were increased for various
labor law violations. If an employer fails to
pay wages or unlawfully withholds wages,
the penalty for a first violation was increased
from $50 to $ 100, and the penalty for subse­
quent or willful or intentional violations was
increased from $100 to $200 plus 25-per­
cent of the amount unlawfully withheld.
Twelve and one-half percent of the penalty
recovered will be placed in a fund within the
Labor and Workforce Development Agency
to educate employers about State labor laws.
The penalty for an employer who pays less
than the minimum wage rose from $50 to
$100 per underpaid employee for each pay
period. The minimum penalty for a railroad
corporation that violates laws regulating
work hours was increased from $200 to
$500, and the maximum penalty rose from
$1,000 to $5,000. The penalty for violating
the laws regulating work hours of employ­
ees in underground mines, smelters, or plants
for the reduction or refining of ores or metals
was increased from $50 to $100 for the first
intentional violation and from $100 to $200
for each subsequent violation. The penalty
for any person who does not hold a State
contractor’s license and who employs work­
ers to perform services for which a license is
required was increased from $100 to $200
per employee for each day of employment.
Legislation was enacted to regulate the
employment of workers in the car washing
and polishing industry. Car wash employ­
ers must register annually, after meeting lo­
cal licensing, bonding and other criteria, with
the Labor Commissioner and pay a registra­
tion fee of $250 for each branch location. A
separate annual fee of $50 for each branch
location is to be deposited into a Car Wash
Worker Restitution Fund to ensure the pay­
ment of wages, penalties, and other damages.
Employers are also to post a surety bond of
$15,000 for the protection of employees.
Failure to register may result in a civil fine of
$100 being assessed for each day of viola­
tion up to a total of $ 10,000. Each employer

must keep accurate and complete employ­
ment records for 3 years including wages
paid, hours worked and tips received. Re­
newal registrations may not be completed
until the employer has satisfied final judg­
ments for any unpaid wages, and contribu­
tions to the Unemployment Insurance Code,
the Employment Development Department,
and Social Security and Medicare contribu­
tions are up to date.
In response to a 2002 court decision
(Smith v. Rae-Venter Law Group), an amend­
ment was made to the wage claim procedure
to specify what determines a successful ap­
peal of a decision of the labor commissioner.
An employee claiming to be owed wages may
either file a civil action against the employer
or file a wage claim with the labor commis­
sioner seeking administrative relief. If the la­
bor commissioner’s decision is appealed to
trial court and the party seeking review is
unsuccessful, the trial court is to assess costs
and reasonable attorney’s fees against the
party who filed the appeal. It is now speci­
fied that an employee is successful so long
as the employee recovers a judgment in his
or her favor. This overturns the court hold­
ing that the appealing party is unsuccessful
unless the court judgment is more favorable
to the appealing party than the labor
commissioner’s award.
The law regulating the payment of salary
or wages by State agencies, which requires
that the employee be furnished with a writ­
ten itemized statement showing all deduc­
tions made from his or her salary or wages,
was amended to permit— at the discretion of
the employee—a State agency to issue the
required statement electronically rather than
in writing. The provision of an electronic
statement of itemized deductions will be con­
tingent upon certain funding contingencies.
A resolution was adopted proclaiming
April 15th, 2003, to be Equal Pay Day in
California and urging California citizens to
recognize the full value of women’s skills
and significant contributions to the labor
force. The resolution also urged Congress to
protect the rights of all American women and
provide more effective remedies to victims
of discrimination in the payment of wages
on the basis of sex and for other purposes.
April 15th symbolizes the day on which
wages paid to American women catch up to
the wages paid to men from the previous
year.
Hours. The law requiring employers to pro­
vide meal periods was amended to exempt
employees in the wholesale baking industry
who are subject to an Industrial Welfare
Commission Wage Order and who are cov­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ered by a valid collective bargaining agree­
ment that provides for a 35-hour workweek
consisting of 5 7-hour days, payment of one
and one-half times the regular rate of pay for
time worked in excess of 7 hours per day,
and a rest period of not less than 10 minutes
every 2 hours.
Family issues. Employers are to allow an
employee who is a victim of a crime, an im­
mediate family member of a victim, a regis­
tered domestic partner of a victim, or the
child of a registered domestic partner of a
victim to be absent from work in order to
attend judicial proceedings related to that
crime. Prior to the absence, the employee is
to give the employer a copy of the notice of
each scheduled proceeding that is provided
to the victim. When advance notice is not
feasible or an unscheduled absence occurs,
the employer is not to take any action
against the employee if he or she, within a
reasonable time, provides the employer with
documentation evidencing the judicial pro­
ceeding. An employee who is absent from
work may use his or her accrued paid vaca­
tion time, personal leave time, sick leave
time, compensatory time off that is other­
wise available to the employee, or unpaid
leave time, unless otherwise provided by a
collective bargaining agreement. The em­
ployer is to keep confidential any records
regarding the employee’s absence from work.
An employer may not discharge from em­
ployment or in any manner discriminate
against an employee because of his or her
absence.
Health insurance. A Health Insurance Act
of 2003 was enacted. This law provides
for creation of the State Health Purchas­
ing Program administered by the Managed
Risk Medical Insurance Board. Large and
medium-sized employers will be required
to p ro v id e th e ir em p lo y ee s w ith
healthcare benefits eith er d irectly or
through the purchasing program by pay­
ment of a fee to the board for coverage.
Employees and their dependents of large
em ployers (em ployers o f 200 or more
persons in the State) are to be covered
beginning January 1, 2006. Employees
and their dependents of m edium -sized
employers (employers of 20 to 199 per­
sons in the State) are to be covered begin­
ning January 1, 2007. Small employers
are exempt from coverage. “Dependent”
is defined as the spouse, domestic part­
ner, minor child of a covered enrollee, or
child 18 years of age and over who is de­
pendent on the enrollee, as specified by
the board.

Child labor. Laws concerning minors with
artistic em ploym ent contracts were
amended. A maximum of 15 percent of the
minor’s gross earnings was set as the amount
that must be deposited in a trust account.
The parent, trustee or guardian must pro­
vide the employer, within 10 business days,
a photocopy of the trustee’s statement re­
garding the established account. In cases
where the parent, guardian or trustee fails to
provide the employer with evidence of the
trust being established within 180 days of
the commencement of employment, the em­
ployer is then required to deposit 15 percent
of the minor’s gross earnings into a special
account held by the Actors’ Fund of America.
The Actors’ Fund is required to notify the
beneficiary of their fund entitlement within
60 days of the minor reaching 18 years of
age. The Labor Commissioner may only is­
sue a work permit for 6 months, and if the
permit is not accompanied by a trustee’s
statement demonstrating the creation of a
trust account, then the permit is invalid after
10 business days from the date of issuance.
Apparel industry. The Public Contract Code
was amended to require the State to provide
a “Sweatfree Code of Conduct“ and pro­
curement policy that requires State agency
procurement contracts (other than those
related to public works contracts) to include
provisions that prohibit the production of
material, equipment, or supplies by forced
labor, convict labor (not including work or
services provided by an individual em­
ployed by the Prison Industry Authority),
indentured labor under penal sanction, abu­
sive forms of child labor, or exploitation of
children in sweatshop labor. This prohibi­
tion includes the procurement or laundering
of apparel, garments, and accessories includ­
ing uniforms. Contractors must certify that
no covered items have been laundered or
produced by or with the benefit of sweat­
shop labor under penalty of perjury. False
certifications will be considered to be mis­
demeanors. Copies of the code of conduct
must be attached to the submitted certifica­
tion. Contractors must comply with mini­
mum wage, overtime, child labor laws, and
benefits applicable to local, State and na­
tional laws of the jurisdiction in which the
labor is performed.
Industrial homework. Changes were made
in the procedures for the disposition of ar­
ticles or materials unlawfully manufactured
at home, and an appeal process was added.
An item unlawfully manufactured at home
may be confiscated by the Division of La­
bor Standards Enforcement, which will be

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

9

State Labor Laws, 2003

responsible for destroying or disposing of
them. The articles or material must not en­
ter the mainstream of commerce and must
not be offered for sale. The division is to,
by certified mail, give notice of the confis­
cation and the procedure for appealing the
confiscation to the person whose name and
address are affixed to the article or material.
The notice will state that failure to file a
written notice of appeal with the labor com­
missioner within 15 days after service of
the notice of confiscation will result in the
destruction or disposition of the confiscated
article or material. To contest the confisca­
tion, a person must, within 15 days of ser­
vice of the notice, file a written notice of
appeal with the labor commissioner. A hear­
ing on the appeal will be held within 30
days. Based on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the labor commissioner may
affirm, modify, or dismiss the confiscation,
and may order the return of none, some, or
all of the confiscated articles or material.
Equal employment opportunity. The prohi­
bition on employment discrimination on the
basis of sex was expanded by including gen­
der in the definition of sex. For this purpose
“gender” means an employee or applicant’s
actual sex or the employer’s perception of
his or her sex, and includes the employer’s
perception of the employee or applicant’s
identity, appearance, or behavior, whether
or not that identity, appearance, or behavior
is different from that traditionally associated
with his or her sex at birth. Employers may
require employees to comply with reason­
able workplace appearance, grooming, and
dress standards consistent with State and
Federal law, provided that employees are al­
lowed to appear or dress consistently with
their gender identity.
Language in the Fair Employment and
Housing Act was clarified to ensure that un­
der State law employers may potentially be
liable for sexual harassment committed
against their workers by clients, customers
and other third parties if they knew or should
have known of the harassment, and failed to
take immediate and appropriate corrective
action to stop the harassment. In reviewing
cases involving the acts of non-employees,
the extent of the employer’s control and any
other legal responsibility that the employer
may have with respect to the conduct of
those non-employees will be considered.
This change is in response to a 2002 court of
appeal decision (Salazar v. Diversified
Paratransit, Inc.), which held that the legisla­
ture did not intend the State’s Fair Employ­
ment and Housing Act to hold employers
potentially responsible for protecting their

10

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

workers from sexual harassment if such ha­
rassment was committed by outside parties
in the workplace.
No State agency may enter into any con­
tract for the acquisition of goods or services
in the amount of $100,000 or more with a
contractor who, in the provision of benefits,
discrim inates between em ployees with
spouses and those with domestic partners,
or discriminates between the domestic part­
ners and spouses of those employees.
The requirement that each supervisor
employed by the State, upon his or her ini­
tial appointment to a supervisory position,
be provided with a minimum of 80 hours of
training was amended to specify that the
training is to include training on the subject
of employment law relating to persons with
disabilities.
Drug and alcohol testing. The law govern­
ing the application for an original or a re­
newal commercial motor carrier permit now
requires that the application include certifi­
cation of enrollment in a controlled substance
and alcohol use and testing program.
Worker privacy. The law providing for the
confidentiality of peace officer or custodial
officer personnel records was amended to
provide that the provisions insuring confi­
dentiality do not apply to investigations or
proceedings concerning the conduct of peace
officers or custodial officers, or an agency or
department that employs these officers, con­
ducted by a grand jury, a district attorney’s
office, or the Attorney General’s office.
Private employment agencies. The State
Business and Professions Code, relating to
contractors, was amended. The term con­
tractor now includes temporary labor ser­
vice agencies that provide short-term em­
ployees to a licensed contractor for the per­
formance of construction work. Such con­
tractors are now required to provide their
State contractor’s license number to the tem­
porary labor service agency providing the
short-term employees. The law does not
apply when a properly licensed contractor
exercises supervision and is directly respon­
sible for the final results of the work prod­
uct. The law does not require that a qualify­
ing individual be present during the supervi­
sion of work covered by the contract.
Plant closing. The law that requires the op­
erator of a solid waste landfill to submit a
plan for the closure and post-closure main­
tenance of the landfill to the California Inte­
grated Waste M anagem ent Board was
amended to also require submission of a La­

January 2004

bor Transition Plan that includes provisions
that ensure, subject to any requirements al­
ready established pursuant to a collective
bargaining agreement, preferential reemploy­
ment and transfer rights of displaced employ­
ees to comparable available employment
with the same employer for a period of no
less than 1 year following the closure of the
solid waste facility; provisions to provide
displaced employees assistance in finding
comparable employment with other employ­
ers; and provisions to ensure compliance
with existing statutory requirements for re­
locations, terminations, and mass layoffs that
are applicable to certain employees.
Displaced workers. A 10-percent bidding
preference was established for public transit
contractors and subcontractors who agree to
retain, for a period of at least 90 days, bus
and rail employees who were employed to
perform essentially the same services by the
previous contractor or subcontractor. If a
successor contractor or subcontractor deter­
mines that fewer employees are needed than
under the prior contract, qualified employ­
ees will be retained by seniority within the
job classification. The existing contractor,
when required by the awarding agency, must
provide employment information relating to
wage rates, benefits, dates of hire, and job
classifications of employees under the exist­
ing service contract to the awarding author­
ity or a successor contractor. A contractor or
subcontractor found to have substantially
breached the contract will be ineligible to bid
on or be awarded a service contract with that
awarding agency for a period of 1 to 3 years.
Whistleblowers. The law prohibiting employ­
ers from making, adopting, or enforcing a
policy that prevents an employee from dis­
closing violations of a State or Federal law or
regulation to a government or law enforcement
agency, or from retaliating against an employee
who makes a disclosure, was amended to ex­
tend this protection to employees who refuse
to participate in an illegal activity or activity
that may result in violations of State or Fed­
eral law or regulation. It was also made un­
lawful for an employer to retaliate against an
employee for having exercised his or her
whistleblower rights in any former employ­
ment. A “whistleblower hotline” is to be es­
tablished in the office of the Attorney General
to receive telephone reports of violations by
an employer. Employers are to display a list
of employee’s rights under whistleblower
laws, including the telephone number of the
hotline. An employer in violation of the law is
liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for
each violation.

Other laws. It was made unlawful for a per­
son or entity to enter into a contract or agree­
ment for labor or services with a construc­
tion, farm labor, garment, janitorial, or secu­
rity guard contractor, where the person or
entity knows or should know that the con­
tract or agreement does not include funds
sufficient to allow the contractor to comply
with all applicable local, State, and Federal
laws or regulations governing the labor or
services to be provided. This does not ap­
ply to a person or entity who executes a
collective bargaining agreement covering the
workers employed under the contract or
agreement, or to a person who enters into a
contract or agreement for labor or services to
be performed on his or her home residences.
A rebuttable presumption is established that
the law is not violated if the labor contract or
any material change to the labor contract is
in writing, contained in a single document
and meets certain requirements including
identifying the person or entity, the labor or
services to be performed, the number of
workers to be employed, the total amount of
wages to be paid, and when payment is to be
made.
Where a person claiming to be aggrieved
by an unlawful employment practice is rep­
resented by private counsel— and not the
Department of Fair Employment and Hous­
ing— the private counsel will now serve the
complaint. In either case, service is to be
completed within 60 days rather than 45
days as was previously required.
A resolution was adopted recognizing
March 31 st as the anniversary of the birth of
Cesar Chavez, and calling upon all Califor­
nians to participate in appropriate obser­
vances to remember him as a symbol of hope
and justice to all persons.

Colorado
Wages. The State compensation for employ­
ment law was amended to exclude the State
or its agencies from coverage. Additionally,
wages or compensation now includes vaca­
tion pay, if an employer provides paid vaca­
tions, and bonuses or commissions earned
for labor or services performed, but not sev­
erance pay. Also, employers may make de­
ductions for the amount of money or value
of property that employees failed to pay or
return to an employer as long as the em­
ployer pays the balance due within 10 days
of termination of employment. There is no
authorization for deductions below the Fed­
eral minimum wage. If wage payments are
not mailed to the place of receipt within the
10 days, the employer will be liable to the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

employee for a penalty. If an employer is
indebted to an employee at his or her time of
death, the employer must pay the amount
due to the deceased employee’s surviving
spouse. If the employee’s wage claim is dis­
puted by the employer, and the employer
makes legal tender of the amount believed
due, the employer is not liable for a penalty
unless the employee receives more wages
than tendered, in a legal action. If the em­
ployee fails to receive a greater sum in a legal
action, he or she must pay the cost of the
action and the employer’s attorney fees.
A resolution was adopted proclaiming
April 15th, 2003, to be Equal Pay Day in
Colorado and urging Colorado citizens to rec­
ognize the full value of women’s skills and
significant contributions to the labor force,
and further encouraging employers to con­
duct an internal pay evaluation to ensure
women are being paid fairly. April 15th sym­
bolizes the day on which wages paid to
American women catch up to the wages paid
to men from the previous year.

Connecticut
Wages. As the result of prior legislation, the
State minimum wage rate rose to $6.90 per
hour, from $6.70, on January 1,2003, and to
$7.10 per hour on January 1, 2004.
Family issues. The family and medical leave
law was amended to require employers to
give employees the right to use up to 2
weeks of accumulated sick leave to attend
to a serious health condition of a son or
daughter, spouse or parent of the employee,
or for the birth or adoption of a child of the
employee. It will be unlawful for an em­
ployer to discharge, threaten to discharge,
demote, suspend or in any manner discrimi­
nate against an employee for using, or at­
tempting to use, the leave. The law was
also amended to change the method of de­
termining the eligibility for use of family
and medical leave. Previously, entitlement
was for a total of 16 workweeks of leave
during any 24-month period, with the 24month period beginning with the first day
of leave taken. Now it will be determined
using any one of the following methods: 1)
consecutive calendar years; 2) any fixed 24month period, such as two consecutive fis­
cal years or a 24-month period measured
forward from an employee’s first date of
employment; 3) a 24-month period mea­
sured forward from an employee’s first day
of leave taken under the law; or 4) a rolling
24-month period measured backward from
an employee’s first day of leave taken.

Equal employment opportunity. The Com­
mission on Human Rights and Opportuni­
ties and the Permanent Commission on the
Status of Women are to provide a minimum
of 10 hours of training a year concerning State
and Federal discrimination laws and tech­
niques for conducting internal investigations
of discrimination complaints to persons des­
ignated by State agencies, departments,
boards or commissions as affirmative action
officers and to persons designated by the
Attorney General to represent the entities
before the Commission on Human Rights and
Opportunities and the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission. In addition to
completing this training, affirmative action
officers are to be responsible for mitigating
any discrim inatory conduct w ithin the
agency, department, board or commission;
investigating all complaints of discrimination
made against the State agency, department,
board or commission; and report all findings
and recommendations upon the conclusion
of an investigation to the commissioner or
director of the State agency, department,
board or commission for proper action.
The act concerning alternative dispute
resolution procedures and complaint repre­
sentation before the Commission on Human
Rights and Opportunities was amended to
provide that the commission may, rather
than must, adopt regulations to establish
procedures and standards for alternate dis­
pute resolution. In complaint hearings, it is
now provided that if the Attorney General
or the commission counsel determines that
the interests of the State will not be ad­
versely affected, the attorney for the com­
plainant is to present all or part of the case in
support of the complaint.
Worker privacy. No employee assistance
professional, employee or State employee
will be required to disclose any information
or records concerning or confirming his or
her voluntary participation in an employee
assistance program sponsored or authorized
by an employer or the State or any of its
agencies. No employee assistance program
may disclose any information or records con­
cerning or confirming an employee’s volun­
tary participation in the program without
his or her prior written consent, except where
disclosure is necessary to prevent harm to
the employee or others.
The law guaranteeing employees access
to their personnel files was amended to
specify that “personnel file” includes elec­
tronic mail and facsimiles pertaining to a par­
ticular employee that has been used by an
employer in making a personnel decision.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

11

State Labor Laws, 2003

District of Colum bia
Other laws. A District of Columbia govern­
ment employee who serves in a reserve com­
ponent of the United States Armed Forces
and who has been or will be called to active
duty as a result of Operation Enduring Free­
dom or Operation Iraqi Freedom, will re­
ceive, upon application and approval, an
amount that equals the difference in com­
pensation between the employee’s District
government basic pay and his or her basic
military pay. This amount will be paid from
the time the employee is called to active duty
until the employee is released from active
duty.

Florida
Wages. Political subdivisions are barred from
establishing, or otherwise requiring an em­
ployer to pay a minimum wage, other than a
Federal minimum wage, or applying a Fed­
eral minimum wage to those wages exempt
from Federal coverage. A minimum wage
other than the Federal minimum wage can be
established for the employees of the politi­
cal subdivision; for the employees of an em­
ployer contracting to provide goods or ser­
vices for the political subdivision, or for the
employees of a subcontractor of such an
employer; or for the employees of an em­
ployer receiving a direct tax abatement or
subsidy from the political subdivision, as a
condition of the direct tax abatement or sub­
sidy. A Federally authorized and recognized
tribal government may establish a minimum
wage in excess of the Federal minimum wage
for persons employed within any territory
over which the tribe has jurisdiction.
Equal employment opportunity. An amend­
ment to the Civil Rights Act authorizes the
Attorney General to bring a civil action for
damages, injunctive relief, civil penalties of
up to $10,000 per violation, and such other
relief as may be appropriate under State law,
where the Attorney General has reasonable
cause to believe that any person or group
either has engaged in a pattern or practice of
prohibited discrimination, or has been dis­
criminated against and the discrimination
raises an issue of great public interest.
Worker privacy. Acts relating to a public
records exemption for State, county, and mu­
nicipal employee assistance program records
were amended to provide that an employee’s
personal identifying information contained
in employee assistance program records is
confidential and exempt from disclosure.
Other laws. As part of a Florida Uniformed

12

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Servicemembers Protection Act, employing
authorities are to adhere to all provisions
contained in the Federal Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
with respect to those serving in the State
National Guard and the United States Armed
Forces.
The law concerning the health benefits
and job protections afforded to members of
the State National Guard and the State De­
partment of Military Affairs was amended.
School district employees are now specifi­
cally included as employees of political sub­
divisions of the State who may take a leave
of absence, not to exceed 30 days, for each
emergency or disaster as established by Ex­
ecutive order. As such, these employees
are protected from being discharged, repri­
manded, or penalized as a result of being ac­
tivated for State duty. Additionally, the re­
quirement for employees to notify their em­
ployers that they wish to continue their
health insurance coverage upon being called
to active duty has been modified to allow the
appropriate military authority to provide au­
thorization. Consistent with Federal law,
such notice is not required if it is precluded
by military necessity or if such notice is im­
possible or unreasonable.

Georgia
Wages. Resolutions were adopted declaring
April 15, 2003, to be Equal Pay Day and
urging the citizens of Georgia to recognize
the full value of women’s skills and signifi­
cant contributions to the labor force and en­
couraging businesses to conduct an internal
pay evaluation to ensure that women are
being paid fairly. April 15th symbolizes the
day on which the wages paid to American
women catch up to the wages paid to men
from the previous year.

Hawaii
Wages. As the result of prior legislation, the
State minimum wage rate rose from $5.75
per hour to $6.25 on January 1, 2003.
Family issues. The State Family and Medi­
cal Leave Act was amended by revising the
definition of “employers” and by defining
“sick leave” and specifying how it can be
used. “Employer” now includes the State
and any of its political subdivisions or in­
strumentalities, reversing the exclusion of
public-sector employees enacted in 2000
that became effective on July 1,2002. “Sick
leave” is an accrued increment of compen­
sated leave provided by an employer for
em ployees’ use when: the employee is
physically or mentally unable to perform

January 2004

his or her duties due to illness, injury or a
medical condition; the absence is for the
purpose of obtaining professional diagno­
sis or treatment for an employee’s medical
condition; or the absence is for other medi­
cal reasons of the employee, such as preg­
nancy or obtaining a physical examination.
It does not include any other type of insur­
ance, compensation or disability benefit not
payable from the employer. Employers
who provide sick leave must permit an em­
ployee to use his or her accrued sick leave,
not to exceed 10 days per year, for pur­
poses defined in the Act, unless an express
provision of a valid collective bargaining
agreement authorizes the use of more than
10 days for family leave purposes.
Public-sector employers are now to pro­
vide employees with at least 2 hours of paid
leave during normal business hours to attend
either a mutually-scheduled parent-teacher
conference for the employee’s minor child,
or a mutually-scheduled parent-caregiver
conference for a preschool-aged child attend­
ing a licensed group childcare center. The
employee may take leave for no more than
two mutually-scheduled conferences per
child in a calendar year, and travel time may
be included as part of the 2 hours permitted
for each conference. The provision of paid
leave may not adversely interfere with the
operations of the work unit nor require the
applicable agency to incur additional human
resources or overtime costs.
Legislation was enacted to assist victims
of domestic or sexual violence and stalking.
Employers with 50 or more employees must
allow employees to take up to 30 days of
unpaid victim leave per calendar year. Em­
ployers with 49 or fewer employees must
allow employees to take up to 5 days of
unpaid victim leave per calendar year. Em­
ployees are entitled to the leave provided it
is for the purpose of 1) seeking medical at­
tention; 2) obtaining services from a victim
services organization; 3) obtaining psycho­
logical or other counseling; 4) temporarily or
permanently relocating; or 5) taking legal ac­
tion. An excused absence may be taken when
the domestic abuse or sexual violence is
against an employee or the employee’s mi­
nor child. Employers may require employ­
ees to report their status once a week and
may require employees to provide a medical
and/or legal certification prior to return to
work. Upon returning, an employee shall
return to the same position or one of compa­
rable status and pay with no loss of accumu­
lated service credits and privileges. Employ­
ees are to exhaust other paid and unpaid leave
benefits before victim leave benefits may be
applied.

Child labor. The Child Labor Law was
amended in order to prohibit minors under
the age of 18 from working in adult enter­
tainment. Additionally, the hours of work
restrictions of minors from 14 to 16 years of
age were modified so that these minors may
not work: 1) more than 18 hours during a
school week nor more than 40 hours in a
non-school week; 2) more than 3 hours on a
school day nor more than 8 hours on a non­
school day. Previously, the combination of
hours of work and hours in school of a minor
employed outside school hours could not
exceed 10 hours per day. To accommodate
year-round school schedules, minors may
now work between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
during any authorized school break rather
than from June 1 through the day before La­
bor Day as before.
Other laws. The Governor or mayor may
grant a State or county employee who is a
certified American Red Cross disaster vol­
unteer up to 30 days paid leave of absence to
perform disaster relief services for the
American Red Cross when a disaster has
been designated as level III or higher by
American Red Cross regulations; officially
declared by the President of the United
States; or declared a state of emergency by
the Governor. The employee must have
prior authorization from the Governor or
mayor, and the leave may not impose an
undue hardship on State or county opera­
tions. Employees granted leave will be paid
at their regular rates of pay, without loss of
seniority, vacation, sick leave, or earned over­
time accumulation.

Idaho
Agriculture. The Idaho Agricultural Labor
Act enacted in 1972 was repealed. This act
created an Agricultural Labor Board that was
never used and was not necessary because of
more recent State and Federal laws address­
ing agricultural labor concerns.
Drug and alcohol testing. The Employer
Alcohol and Drug-Free Workplace Act was
amended to extend coverage to public sec­
tor employers. The law specifies that it is
lawful to test employees or prospective em­
ployees for the presence of drugs or alcohol
as a condition of hiring or continued em­
ployment if the employer has a written test­
ing policy. The State of Idaho or any politi­
cal subdivision that conducts drug and alco­
hol testing of all those employees and ap­
plicants for whom such testing is not con­
stitutionally prohibited will qualify for the
workers’ compensation insurance premium


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

reduction that is available to private sector
employers.
Department o f labor. An Executive order
was issued renaming the Disability Determi­
nations Unit the Disability Determinations
Service and transferring it from the Execu­
tive Office of the Governor to the Idaho De­
partment of Labor.
Other laws. A Voluntary Contributions Act
was adopted. This law requires that labor
organizations that engage in political activi­
ties keep a segregated fund for all political
contributions. Union dues are not to be used
for political activities, transferred to the fund,
or intermingled in any way with fund mon­
eys. Employee contributions to the fund
must be on a voluntary basis without fear of
reprisal and are to be made directly by the
donor. Payroll withholding of funds to be
used for political purposes is prohibited.

Illinois
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate for employees 18 years
of age or older from $5.15 per hour to $5.50
per hour on January 1, 2004, with a further
increase to $6.50 per hour scheduled for
January 1,2005. Employees under 18 years
of age may be paid up to 50 cents less than
the regular rate. A provision that the wage
rate paid by employers be not less than the
Federal hourly minimum wage rate was
eliminated.
Among changes in the prevailing wage
law, prevailing wage rate requirements are
now to be inserted in project specifications
as well as in public works contracts. It will
also be mandatory for each contractor, sub­
contractor, and lower-tiered subcontractor to
insert these requirements into the contracts
they let. The contractor and each subcon­
tractor or the officer of the public body in
charge of the project is to make and keep, for
at least 3 years, records of the name, ad­
dress, telephone number when available, so­
cial security number and occupation of all
laborers, workers and mechanics employed
by them on the public works project. In
addition to actual hourly wages paid, records
are now to show the hours worked each day
by each employee. Every employer, upon
request, is to furnish the Director with a
sworn statement of the accuracy of the
records. Objections to a rate determination
may be made within 30 days after the De­
partment of labor has published a prevailing
wage schedule on its official Web site. A
hearing is to be held within 45 days after the
objection is filed, and a final determination

by the Department of Labor or a public body
is to be rendered within 30 days after the
conclusion of the hearing.
Executive Order No. 13 was issued re­
quiring State agencies, on a project-byproject basis, to consider a project labor
agreement for a public works project where
the agency determines that such an agree­
ment advances the State’s interests of cost,
efficiency, quality, safety, timeliness, skilled
labor force, labor stability or the State’s
policy to advance minority- and womenowned businesses and minority and female
employment. Project labor agreements are a
form of pre-hire collective bargaining agree­
ment covering all terms and conditions of
employment on a specific project. Any de­
cision by a State agency to use a project
agreement is to be supported by a written
publicly disclosed finding setting forth the
justification for its use. Criteria for project
agreements include procedures for immedi­
ate and binding settlement of jurisdictional
disputes and grievances, no-strike provi­
sions, lowest qualified responsible bidder
language, and a guarantee of a reliable source
of skilled and experienced labor.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
expand coverage by removing the “for pub­
lic use” phrase from the definition of cov­
ered public works projects. The previous
w ording exem pted some public works
projects from prevailing wage obligations
because the projects were not developed es­
sentially for public use. Amendments also
specify that the law will cover all projects
financed in whole or in part with funds from
the Fund for Illinois’ Future program and
acts designed to finance school and trans­
portation infrastructure improvements.
The State P ro cu rem en t Code was
amended to expand application of the pre­
vailing wage requirement provisions to now
include building and grounds services, site
technician services, and natural resources ser­
vices. The prohibition against considering
State employee collective bargaining agree­
ments when determining the prevailing wage
rate was eliminated.
The Illinois Renewable Fuels Develop­
ment Program Act was adopted, establishing
a $ 15 million grant program providing finan­
cial assistance for constructing or modifying
plants capable of annually producing at least
30 million gallons of renewable fuels such as
ethanol and bio-diesel fuel. The law requires
that projects receiving such funds be subject
to the prevailing wage law and enter into
project labor agreements. Project labor agree­
ments are to include provisions establishing
the minimum hourly wage, benefits and other
compensation for each class of labor organi-

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

13

State Labor Laws, 2003

zation employee, and provisions establish­
ing that no strike or disputes will be engaged
in by the labor organization employees.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
cover all projects financed in whole or in part
with funds from the Department of Com­
merce and Community Affairs under the Illi­
nois Renewable Fuels Development Program
Act for which there is no project labor agree­
ment. The law also added provisions speci­
fying that the wage for a tradesman perform­
ing maintenance is equivalent to that of a
tradesman engaged in construction, and mak­
ing it mandatory to post the prevailing wage
rates for each craft or type of worker or me­
chanic needed on the project at the project
site at a location that is easily accessible to
the workers engaged on the project.
Family issues. The Department of Com­
merce and Community Affairs may estab­
lish a family-friendly workplace initiative.
The Department may develop a program to
annually collect information regarding the
State’s private eligible employers providing
the most family-friendly benefits to their
employees. The same program may be es­
tablished for public employers. Employers
chosen by the Department may be recog­
nized with annual “family-friendly work­
place” awards and a Statewide information
and advertising campaign publicizing the
employers’ awards, their contributions to
family-friendly childcare, and the methods
they used to improve the dependent care ex­
periences of their employees’ families.
A Victims’ Economic Security and Safety
Act was enacted. Under this act, the State,
any unit of local government or school board,
or any employer of 50 or more employees
must allow an employee who is a victim of
domestic or sexual violence or who has a
family or household member who is a victim
to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid leave
during any 12-month period and to maintain
health benefits during the leave. Leave may
be taken to: (A) seek medical attention for,
or recover from, physical or psychological
injuries caused by the domestic or sexual vio­
lence; (B) obtain services from a victim ser­
vices organization; (C) obtain psychological
or other counseling; (D) participate in safety
planning, temporarily or permanently relo­
cating, or taking other actions to increase the
safety of the employee or the employee’s
family or household member from future
domestic or sexual violence, or to ensure eco­
nomic security; or (E) seek legal assistance
or remedies including preparing for or par­
ticipating in any civil or criminal legal pro­
ceeding related to or derived from domestic
or sexual violence. If possible, the employee

14

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

is to provide the employer with at least 48
hours’ advance notice of his or her intention
to take the leave. The employer may require
the employee to provide certification of the
need for the leave. Upon returning, an em­
ployee is to be restored to the same or an
equivalent position with no loss of any ac­
crued employment benefit. Employment
discrimination is prohibited against an indi­
vidual because he or she is perceived to be a
victim of domestic or sexual violence.
Equal employment opportunity. The State
enacted the Equal Pay Act of 2003. Under
the Act no employer with four or more em­
ployees may discriminate between employ­
ees, in the matter of the wage rate paid, on
the basis of sex for the same or substantially
similar work on the performance of jobs that
require equal skill, effort, and responsibility,
performed under similar working conditions
unless payment is based upon seniority,
merit, production quality or quantity, or a
differential factor other than sex. Employ­
ers may not interfere with the employee’s
exercise of his or her rights under the Act,
discharge the employee because the em­
ployee filed a charge, has given or is about to
give information in a proceeding, or has tes­
tified or is about to testify in such a proceed­
ing. Employers found in violation will be
required to pay the wage differential to the
affected employees and pay legal costs and
damages. Violators may also be subject to a
civil fine of up to $2,500 per violation. No­
tices regarding this Act are to be posted in a
conspicuous place on the premises of the
employer where employee notices are cus­
tomarily posted.
The Illinois Civil Rights Act of 2003 was
enacted. This act prohibits any unit of State,
county, or local government from excluding a
person from participation in, denying a per­
son the benefits of, or subjecting a person to
discrimination under any program or activity
on the grounds of his or her race, color, or
national origin, and from using criteria or meth­
ods of administration that have the effect of
subjecting individuals to such discrimination.
Any party aggrieved by a violation may bring
a lawsuit, in a State circuit court, against the
offending unit of government.
It is now a civil rights violation for an
employer to impose a restriction that has
the effect of prohibiting a language from be­
ing spoken by an employee in communica­
tions that are unrelated to the employee’s
duties. “Language” is defined as being a
person’s native tongue.
The State Lawsuit Immunity Act was
amended to provide that a current, former or
prospective employee of the State who is

January 2004

aggrieved by any conduct or action or inac­
tion of the State that would constitute a vio­
lation of the Federal Age Discrimination Act
of 1967, the Federal Family and Medical
Leave Act, the Federal Americans with Dis­
abilities Act of 1990, or Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 may bring a civil action
under that Act against the State. In addition,
an employee of the State who is aggrieved
by any conduct or action or inaction of the
State that would constitute a violation of the
Federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
may bring a civil action under that Act against
the State.
A resolution was adopted creating a 10member Commission on Opportunity in
State Public Construction to undertake a
comprehensive study to determine the exist­
ence and the extent of racial and gender dis­
crimination on public construction contracts
in the State. This determination shall be ac­
complished via public hearings and socialscientific research. If such discrimination is
discovered, the Commission is to develop
policy recommendations to remedy the dis­
crimination. If the Commission determines
that there are racial and gender-neutral barri­
ers to minority and female participation on
State public construction projects, the Com­
mission is to develop policy recommenda­
tions to reduce the barriers to full participa­
tion. The Commission will have investiga­
tory powers and is to deliver a report of its
findings, the transcripts of its public hear­
ings, and its research to the Governor and
the General Assembly by June 30, 2004.
Private employment agencies. The Day and
Temporary Labor Services Act was amended
to provide that third-party employers are
prohibited from entering into contracts for
the employment of day or temporary labor­
ers with any person or entity not registered
as a day and temporary labor service agency.
The Department of Labor was authorized to
inspect contracts for the employment of all
day or temporary laborers entered into by a
third-party employer if the department has
received a complaint indicating that the third
party employer may have contracted with
an unregistered agency. Upon request, the
department will provide to a third-party
employer a list of entities registered as day
and temporary labor service agencies. This
list will also be available on the Internet.
The ban on the employment of any pro­
fessional strikebreaker in the place of an
employee, whose work has ceased as a di­
rect consequence of a lockout or strike, was
amended to also prohibit an employer from
knowingly contracting with a day and tem­
porary labor service agency to provide a

replacement for the employee. A day and
temporary labor service agency may not
send any such laborer to any place where a
strike, a lockout, or other labor trouble ex­
ists. A day or temporary laborer who had
been assigned to work for the employer at
the time that the strike or lockout began
may continue to be employed.

Whistleblowers. A Whistleblower Act ap­
plicable to private sector employers was
enacted. It provides that an employer may
not make, adopt, or enforce any rule, regula­
tion, or policy preventing an employee from
disclosing information to a government or
law enforcement agency if the employee has
reasonable cause to believe that the informa­
tion discloses a violation of a State or Fed­
eral law, rule, or regulation. An employer
may not retaliate against an employee for
disclosing such information or for refusing
to participate in an activity that would re­
sult in a violation of a State or Federal law,
rule, or regulation. Violation of the law is a
Class A misdemeanor. If an employer takes
any action against an employee in violation
of the act, the employee may bring a civil
action against the employer for relief, includ­
ing but not limited to reinstatement, back
pay, compensation for damages, litigation
costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable
attorney’s fees. The act does not apply to
disclosures that would constitute a violation
of the attorney-client privilege.
Executive Order No. 4 was issued speci­
fying that any officer, employee or appoin­
tee of any State agency is banned from retali­
ating against, attempting to retaliate against,
or in any m anner interfering w ith a
whistleblower for reasons arising out of his
or her activities as defined in the State Whistle
Blower Protection Act. Any officer, em­
ployee or appointee of any agency who
knowingly violates the provisions of the
Executive order will be subject to disciplin­
ary action, including but not limited to dis­
charge.
The Whistleblower Reward and Protec­
tion Act was amended to provide that the
Attorney General may, instead of shall, del­
egate the authority to issue subpoenas, sub­
ject to conditions as the Attorney General
deems appropriate. Additionally, the per­
son issuing the subpoena shall advise that
the person receiving the subpoena has 20
days from the date of service or up until the
return date specified in the demand, which­
ever date is earlier, to move, modify, or set
aside the subpoena. Finally, the amendment
removed all language concerning service of
notice in foreign countries.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Other laws. Executive Order No. 6 was is­
sued providing that any full-time employee
of the State under the control of the Gover­
nor, who is a member of any reserve compo­
nent of the United States Armed Forces, in­
cluding but not limited to the Illinois Army
or Air National Guard, who is mobilized to
active duty in response to the war with Iraq
or other potential threats to national secu­
rity, will continue to receive his or her regu­
lar compensation as a State employee, plus
any health insurance and other benefits he or
she is currently receiving, minus the amount
of his or her base pay for military activities.
Legislation similar to Executive Order
No. 6 was enacted providing that any full­
time employee of the State, other than an
independent contractor, who is a member of
the Illinois National Guard or a reserve com­
ponent of the United States Armed Forces
or the Illinois State Militia and who is mobi­
lized to active duty must continue during the
period of active duty to receive his or her
benefits and regular compensation as a State
employee, minus an amount equal to his or
her military active duty base pay.
Coverage of the Military Leave of Ab­
sence Act was expanded to now include em­
ployees of units of local government and
school districts in addition to employees of
the State as before. The law now provides
that any full-time employee of the State, a
unit of local government, or a school district,
other than an independent contractor, who
is a member of the Armed Forces will be
granted leave from his or her public employ­
ment for any period actively spent in mili­
tary service. Home rule units are barred from
regulating their employees in a manner in­
consistent with the law.
A State Prohibition of Goods from Forced
Labor Act was enacted. It provides that each
contract entered into by a State agency for
the procurement of equipment, materials, or
supplies must specify that foreign-made
goods produced under the contract were not
produced in whole or in part by forced, con­
vict, or indentured labor. A contractor in vio­
lation may be subject to a penalty of the
greater of $ 1,000 or 20 percent of the value
of the equipment, materials, or supplies; the
contract may be voided; and the contractor
may be suspended from bidding on a State
contract for up to 360 days. Sanctions may
be waived if it is determined that the con­
tractor acted in good faith.
It was made unlawful for a person to
knowingly use a false academic degree for
the purpose of obtaining employment.
A resolution was adopted recognizing
March 31st as Cesar Chavez Day in Illi­
nois and encouraging public and private

entities throughout the State to celebrate
his birthday.

Indiana
Child labor. The child labor law was
amended to make it unlawful to permit a
child who is under age 18 to work after 10
p.m. and before 6 a.m. in an establishment
that is open to the public, unless another
employee at least 18 years of age also works
in the establishment during the same hours
as the child. Violation will be considered to
be a hazardous occupation violation subject
to a warning letter for any violations found
during an initial inspection; a $ 100 fine per
instance for each violation identified in a
subsequent inspection; $200 per instance
for a third violation; and $400 per instance
for a fourth or subsequent violation that
occurs not more than 2 years after a prior
violation. Another amendment changes the
rest break requirement for children who
work at least 6 consecutive hours— from a
single break of at least 30 minutes to one or
two breaks totaling at least 30 minutes with
the time period specified for making the
break available eliminated.
Equal employment opportunity. The Gover­
nor issued an Executive order establishing a
Native American Indian Affairs Commission
to study issues common to Native American
Indian residents of Indiana in the areas of
employment, education, civil rights, health,
and housing. The commission may make
recommendations to appropriate Federal,
State, and local government agencies con­
cerning issues including measures to stimu­
late job skill training and related workforce
development, including initiatives to assist
employers to overcome communication and
cultural differences, and programs to encour­
age the growth and support of Native Ameri­
can-owned businesses. The commission is
to report on its activities to the Governor at
least annually.
Worker privacy. The law relating to public
records was amended to provide that the
factual basis of a disciplinary action in
which final action has been taken resulting
in the suspension, demotion, or discharge
of a public employee is a public record.
Another change allows a governing body in
an executive session to receive information
about misconduct and discuss the status of
a school bus driver, who is an independent
contractor, before the governing body makes
a determination.
Other laws. A law was enacted extending
active duty military rights and protections

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

15

State Labor Laws, 2003

to members of the State National Guard or­
dered to training or duty under Federal law
or ordered by the Governor to State active
duty for 30 or more consecutive days. The
law specifies that the provisions of the Fed­
eral Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act and
the Federal Uniformed Services Employment
and Reemployment Rights Act apply when
members of the State Guard are called up in
the above circumstances.

Iowa
Wages. The law prescribing when unclaimed
intangible personal property is presumed to
be abandoned was amended to specify that
unpaid wages, including wages represented
by payroll checks or other compensation for
personal services owing in the ordinary
course of the holder’s business that remain
unclaimed by the owner for more than 1 year
after becoming payable, are presumed to be
abandoned.
Other laws. State employees, other than
those covered under a collective bargaining
agreement that provides otherwise, will now
be granted paid leaves of absence of up to 5
workdays to serve as a bone marrow donor
and of up to 30 workdays to serve as a vas­
cular organ donor if the employee provides
written verification from his or her physi­
cian or the hospital involved that the em­
ployee will serve as such a donor. Employ­
ees granted such leaves of absence will not
suffer loss of seniority, pay, vacation time,
personal days, sick leave, insurance and
health coverage benefits or earned overtime
accumulation. In addition, grants from the
anatomical gift and transplantation fund,
may now be available upon application to
living organ donors or recipients, or their le­
gal representatives.

nor issued an Executive order directing the
head of each executive branch State agency
under the jurisdiction of the Governor to 1)
adopt a policy statement prohibiting sexual
harassment and distribute the policy state­
ment throughout the agency; 2) provide
training that sensitizes managers, supervi­
sors, and employees on the subject of sexual
harassment; 3) develop and provide employ­
ees with proper procedures for expressing
complaints or concerns on sexual harass­
ment, including information on the proce­
dures for filing complaints with enforcement
agencies when requested; 4) develop and
implement an internal mechanism to assure
prompt, confidential, and appropriate han­
dling of sexual harassment complaints within
the State agency, which includes the enforce­
ment of appropriate disciplinary action; and
5) submit the policy statement and internal
complaint and investigation mechanism pro­
cedures to the Secretary of Administration
for review.
Inmate labor. The law related to the charging
of inmate fees in order to defray the mainte­
nance costs of county jails was amended by
raising the allowable fee to a maximum of $20
per day. This fee will be required of any in­
mate who participates in a work release or job
training program for which the inmate receives
compensation or a subsistence allowance.

Kentucky
Inmate labor. Among provisions of a law
enacted regarding work by State prisoners
on public agency projects, it was specified
that the labor of State inmates is not to be
used on any construction, building, or build­
ing maintenance project outside of the prison
where use of such labor would reduce skilled
employment opportunities for citizens of the
Commonwealth.

Kansas
Wages. The definition of “employer” in the
wage payment act was amended to now in­
clude limited liability companies or other
organizations employing any person. Addi­
tionally, any officer, manager, major share­
holder or other person who has charge of the
affairs of an employer, and who knowingly
permits the employer to engage in violations
of required pay periods, or timely payment
when the employee is discharged, may be
deemed the employer for purposes of this
act. This language replaces a provision that
had deemed the corporation or any officer or
agent having the management of the corpora­
tion to be the employer.
Equal employment opportunity. The Gover­

16

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Other laws. A Kentucky National Guard and
Reserve Employers’ Council was created to
advise public and private sector employers of
the importance of supporting the National
Guard and U.S. military reserves by provid­
ing employee members with time off for train­
ing, and with job security during times of mo­
bilization. The council may recommend solu­
tions to employment problems encountered
by members of the National Guard or military
reserves who are mobilized, and it may offer
proposed policy or statutory changes to deal
with those problems.

Louisiana
Wages. The law requiring that an employee
who resigns be paid his or her wages on or

January 2004

before the next regular payday or no later
than 15 days following the date of resigna­
tion, whichever occurs first, was amended to
specify that the payday refers to the next
regular payday for the pay cycle during
which the employee was working at the time
of separation.
A resolution was adopted proclaiming
Tuesday, April 15, 2003, as Equal Pay Day
in Louisiana and urging residents of the State
to recognize the full value of women’s skills
and significant contributions to the labor
force. Businesses were urged to conduct an
internal pay evaluation to ensure that women
are being paid fairly. April 15th symbolizes
the day on which the wages paid to Ameri­
can women catch up to the wages paid to
men from the previous year.
Overtime limits. A resolution was adopted
establishing a Mandatory Overtime Study
Committee to assess the extent of registered
nurse mandatory overtime use in the State
and to work with the Nursing Supply and
Demand Commission to make specific rec­
ommendations to the legislature by March
1, 2004, regarding committee findings and
any recommended legislation.
Child labor. The child labor law was
amended to repeal an exemption for em­
ployment or training related to curricu­
lum while attending a business or voca­
tional-technical school, and to revise pro­
visions relating to em ployment certifi­
cates and permissible hours of employ­
ment. The employer obligation to keep
on file an employment certificate or work
permit for each minor no longer applies
to work permits. The requirem ent that
certificates be provided in triplicate was
eliminated and replaced with one that the
school superintendent complete and elec­
tronically submit— the Employment Cer­
tificate Form— found on the Department
of Labor’s Web site, with the original cer­
tificate being signed by the minor and the
issuing authority and given to the em­
ployer. The requirement for different col­
ored certificates issued based upon the age
of the applicant was repealed. The re­
quirement that minors under age 16 not be
employed before 7 a.m. or after 7 p.m., or
after 9 p.m. from June 1 through Labor
Day, was revised to now prohibit minors
who have not graduated from high school
from working after 10 p.m. on any day
prior to a day during which school is in
session, or after midnight on any day prior
to a day during which school is not in ses­
sion. Minors under the age of 16 who
have not graduated from high school are

prohibited from working before 7 a.m. or
after 7 p.m. on any day prior to a day
during which school is in session or after
9 p.m. on any day prior to a day during
which school is not in session. No minor
under the age of 16 who has not graduated
from high school is to be employed more
than 40 hours in any one week.
Worker privacy. Any employer who has
conducted a background check of an em­
ployee or prospective employee after hav­
ing obtained his or her written consent or at
the request of the owner or operator of any
facility where the employer performs or may
perform all or part of its work will be im­
mune from civil liability for claims arising
out of the disclosure of the background in­
formation obtained. The limitation of liabil­
ity will extend to all claims of the employee
based upon a failure to hire, wrongful termi­
nation, and invasion of privacy, as well as all
claims of any owner, operator, or any third
person for claims of negligent hiring or negli­
gent retention.
The law governing public records was
amended to specify that all medical records,
claim forms, insurance applications, re­
quests for the payment of benefits, and all
other health records of public employees,
public officials, and their dependents in the
personnel records of any public body will
be confidential.
The law governing public records was
amended to add the name and account num­
ber of any financial institution to which the
public employee’s wages or salary are di­
rectly deposited by an electronic direct de­
posit payroll system or other direct deposit
payroll system to the list of items in the
personnel records of a public employee body
that will be confidential.
Private employment agencies. The employ­
ment agency regulatory law was amended
to exempt employer-fee-paid employment
services from testing, licensing, and bond­
ing requirements.
Inmate labor. The ban on participation in
work release programs by persons convicted
of production, distribution or possession
with intent to distribute cocaine or marijuana
was amended to permit participation, during
the last 6 months of their terms, by any per­
son convicted of distribution or possession
with intent to distribute cocaine where the
offense involved less than 28 grams of co­
caine or by any person convicted of distri­
bution or possession with intent to distrib­
ute marijuana where the offense involved less
than one pound of marijuana.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Other laws. The prohibition against dis­
charging an employee who is called to serve
or who is serving on jury duty was amended
to also prohibit any other adverse employ­
ment action. The protection was modified
to apply if the employee notifies his or her
employer of a summons within a reasonable
period of time after its receipt and prior to
his or her appearance for jury duty. A
Lengthy Trial Fund is to be established to
provide full or partial wage replacement of
up to $300 per day to jurors who serve for
more than 10 days on civil and criminal petit
juries if conviction of the alleged crime car­
ries a sentence of 20 years or more at hard
labor, and whose employers pay less than
full regular wages during the jury service.
After military leave with pay has been
exhausted, any State employee called to ac­
tive duty service in the uniformed services
of the United States pursuant to a declara­
tion of war, congressional authorization, or
presidential proclamation pursuant to the
War Powers Resolution, or national emer­
gency whose military base pay is less than
his or her State base pay must be paid the
difference between the military base pay and
the State base pay in his or her regular posi­
tion. The payment is to be made in the same
frequency and manner as the employee’s
regular State pay. Any employee receiving
the pay differential is to provide to his or her
employer all such documentation appropri­
ate to ensure that the amount of the pay­
ment is accurately calculated.
A resolution was adopted urging the State
Department of Labor to review its operation
of the incumbent worker training program in
rural areas, in that the current process for
applying for admission into the program is
tedious and is difficult for companies in rural
areas.

Maine
Wages. As the result of prior legislation, the
State minimum wage rate rose from $5.75 to
$6.25 per hour on January 1, 2003.
A law was enacted which permits, to the
extent permitted under the Federal Fair La­
bor Standards Act, public employees of the
executive or judicial branch of the State to be
awarded compensatory time in lieu of over­
time pay. Additionally, limitations have been
placed on the recovery of unpaid overtime
wages for executive or judicial branch em­
ployees. In actions to recover such wages,
the judgment or award is limited to the com­
pensation due without liquidated damages
or attorney’s fees. Such actions must be
brought within 2 years after the cause of ac­
tion accrued. When the cause arises from a

willful violation, the action must then be
brought within 3 years.
A resolution was adopted pertaining to
the legislative review of the proposed Rules
Governing Alternative Methods of Payment
of Overtime for Certain Drivers and Driver’s
Helpers, a substantive rule of the Depart­
ment of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
which was submitted to the legislature for
review as required by law. The resolution
stated that the Department of Labor was to
ask the Attorney General to provide a legal
opinion as to the ability of the Department
of Labor to take into account hours worked
outside o f the State when determ ining
whether overtime pay is required for work
within the State. The Department of Labor
was to meet in September 2003 with the
Joint Standing Committee on Labor in order
to report on the Attorney General’s opinion
and the department’s response to the opin­
ion including any proposed changes to the
rule.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
raise the dollar threshold amount for public
works construction contracts let by the State
from $10,000 to $50,000.
Contractors and subcontractors in charge
of the construction of a public work must
now keep accurate records showing the
names and occupations and wages and ben­
efits of all independent contractors working
under contract with them as well as all la­
borers, workers and mechanics employed
by them as before. A copy of each such
record is to be filed monthly with the public
authority that let the contract. The filed
record is a public record except that the au­
thority must adopt rules to protect the pri­
vacy of personal information such as Social
Security numbers and taxpayer identifica­
tion numbers.
Child labor. The section of the child labor
law regarding prohibited hazardous employ­
ment for minors under age 18 was amended
to provide that the Director of the Bureau of
Labor Standards is to adopt rules prohibit­
ing any such minor from working in confined
spaces or at a designated height when regula­
tions of the Federal Occupational Safety and
Health Administration require special pre­
cautions or procedures for such work. The
rules must provide exceptions to the prohi­
bition in specific exceptional circumstances,
such as work required for public safety.
Worker privacy. The law providing for
employee access to their personnel files
was amended to require that, in each cal­
endar year, the employer must provide,
at no cost to the employee, one copy of

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

17

State Labor Laws, 2003

the entire personnel file upon request by
the employee or former employee, and,
upon request, one copy of all m aterial
added to the file after the copy of the en­
tire file was provided. The cost of copy­
ing any other material requested during
that calendar year will be paid by the per­
son requesting the copy.

employee’s active duty base salary paid by
the Federal government and the employee’s
State base salary or direct wages. The com­
pensation provided may not exceed an
em ployee’s State base salary or direct
wages. An eligible employee must elect to
use either the military administrative leave
or other available paid leave to which he or
she is entitled.

Maryland
Wages. The Advisory Committee on the
Wage and Hour Law and the Advisory Coun­
cil on Prevailing Wage Rates were abolished.
An em ployer who w ithholds an
employee’s dues to an employee member­
ship entity must now also collect any con­
tributions specified by the employee for
one or more affiliated political action com­
mittees of the employee membership en­
tity, and then transmit the contributions to
that entity.
Drug and alcohol testing. Saliva derived
from the human body was added to the list
of specimens that may be used for job-re­
lated substance abuse testing. The others
that may be used are blood, urine, and hair.
Private employment agencies. Licensing and
regulation of employment agencies and em­
ployment counselors were eliminated. An
employment agency will now be required to
submit a $7,000 penal bond to the Commis­
sioner of Labor and Industry. A list of pro­
hibited employment agency activities in­
cludes knowingly referring a client to a job if
any condition of the job violates any law;
referring a client to an establishment where a
labor dispute exists; advertising for a job for
which there is no order by an employer on
file; charging a client a registration fee or col­
lecting in advance from a client a payment
for service to be performed for the client to
obtain employment; and publishing any
false, fraudulent, or misleading information
or promise. Nurse registries will be subject
to the law.
Other laws. The Commissioner of Labor
and Industry was authorized to charge a
fee to cover the cost of providing media­
tion services.
The law relating to leave of absence for
State employees who are members of the
organized militia and who are ordered to ac­
tive duty was amended to provide for mili­
tary administrative leave. An eligible State
employee is entitled to military administra­
tive leave in an amount sufficient to com­
pensate the employee, during each pay pe­
riod for which he or she is eligible for the
leave, for the difference betw een the

18

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Michigan
Wages. The Unclaimed Property Act was
amended concerning the treatment of unpaid
wages. The provision that unpaid wages
which are unclaimed by the owner for more
than 1 year after becoming payable are pre­
sumed to be abandoned will now apply only
to unpaid wages greater than $50. Unclaimed
unpaid wages of $50 or less are no longer
subject to the act.
The Governor issued an Executive order
which stipulates that the Department of
Management and Budget may debar a ven­
dor from consideration for the award of a
contract for the provision of goods or ser­
vices to the State, or suspend the procure­
ment of goods or services from a vendor if,
within the past 3 years, an officer of the
vendor, or an owner of a 25-percent or greater
interest in the vendor has been convicted of
an offense, violated any State or Federal law,
as determined by a court or an administra­
tive proceeding, which, in the opinion of the
Department, indicates that the vendor is un­
able to perform responsibly or which reflects
a lack of integrity that could negatively im­
pact or reflect upon the State or has failed or
refused to provide requested information. An
offense or violation of this statute may in­
clude, but is not limited to laws relating to
prevailing wages on State projects, the pay­
ment of wages and fringe benefits, and occu­
pational safety and health.
Department o f labor. The Governor issued
Executive Order Number 18 changing the
name of the Department of Consumer and
Industry Services to the Department of La­
bor and Economic Growth. A new Wage and
Hour Division is created within the depart­
ment headed by a Wage and Hour Adminis­
trator. Any authority, powers, functions,
duties and responsibilities of the former
Wage and Hour Division of the Department
of Consumer and Industry Services, trans­
ferred to the Bureau of Worker’s and Unem­
ployment Compensation under an Executive
order in 2002, are transferred to the new
Wage and Hour Division, including, but not
limited to, responsibility for the minimum
wage, wage payment, prevailing wage, and
youth employment laws.

January 2004

Minnesota
Child labor. A minor at least 11 and less than
14 years of age will be exempt from the mini­
mum age provisions of the child labor law if
employed as a youth athletic program ref­
eree, umpire, or official for an age bracket
younger than the minor’s own age if an adult
representing the State or local athletic pro­
gram is on the premises at which the event is
occurring and a person responsible for the
program has a written acknowledgment
signed by the minor’s parent or guardian con­
senting to the minor’s employment.
A similar law was enacted exempting chil­
dren at least 11 and less than 14 years of age
from the minimum age provisions of the
child labor law for employment as assistant
referees in youth soccer athletic program
events in which the participants are under
14 years of age. An adult representing the
State or local athletic program must be on
the premises where the event is occurring,
and a person responsible for the athletic pro­
gram possesses a written acknowledgment
signed by the minor’s parent or guardian con­
senting to the minor’s employment as an as­
sistant soccer referee.
Private employment agencies. The law regu­
lating and requiring licensing of entertainment
agencies was repealed.
Other laws. It was specified that civil ac­
tions against the State may be brought in
Federal court by an employee, former em­
ployee, or prospective employee of the State
who is aggrieved by the State’s violation of
the Federal Age Discrimination Act of 1967,
the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act,
or the Federal Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. An employee of the State who
is aggrieved by the State’s violation of the
Federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
may also bring a civil action in Federal court.
Each State agency must— and cities,
counties, towns, school districts, and other
political subdivisions may— pay to each eli­
gible member of the national guard or other
reserve component of the armed forces of
the United States an amount equal to the
difference between the member’s basic ac­
tive duty military salary and the salary the
member would be paid in his or her regular
job, including any adjustments the member
would have received if not on leave of ab­
sence. Payments must not extend beyond 4
years from the date the employee reported
for active service, plus any additional time
the employee may be legally required to
serve. State agencies must continue the
employee’s enrollment in health and dental
coverage, and the employer contribution to-

ward that coverage, until the employee is
covered by health and dental coverage pro­
vided by the armed forces. The agency must
also permit the employee to continue par­
ticipating in any pre-tax account in which
the employee participated when he or she
reported for active service, to the extent of
employee pay available for that purpose.
Political subdivisions have total discretion
regarding employee benefit continuation.

Mississippi
School attendance. The Compulsory School
Attendance Law was amended to apply to
any child who has attained or will attain the
age of 5 years on or before September 1 and
has enrolled in a full-day public school kin­
dergarten program. Provided, however, that
the parent or guardian of any child enrolled
in a full-day public school kindergarten pro­
gram will be allowed to remove the child from
the program on a one-time basis, and the
child will not be deemed a compulsory
school-age child until he or she becomes 6
years old.
Other laws. A law was passed creating a
program of paid educational leave for hospi­
tal employees. Hospitals may grant paid
educational leave to an employee(s) who 1)
is working at the sponsoring hospital at the
time of application; 2) attends any college or
school approved and designated by the spon­
soring hospital; and 3) agrees to work in a
healthcare occupation as a licensed practical
nurse, registered nurse, nurse practitioner,
speech pathologist, occupational or physi­
cal therapist, or other healthcare professional
in the sponsoring hospital for period of time
equal to the paid educational leave time, but
not less than 2 years. Before leave is granted,
each applicant shall enter into a contract with
the sponsoring hospital agreeing to the terms
and conditions of the leave being issued.
Failure to meet the terms of the contract shall
be grounds for revocation of the professional
license that was earned through the paid edu­
cational leave program.

Montana
Wages. The exemption from minimum wage
and overtime payment requirements for
those individuals providing companionship
services to the aged or infirm was amended
to specify that this exemption also applies
to those individuals providing respite care
and that the exemption applies only when
the person providing the service is em­
ployed directly by a family member or an
individual who is a legal guardian. This ex­
emption is more restrictive than Federal law


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

as the person providing the service must be
employed directly by a family member and
not by a third-party provider.
The prevailing wage law was amended to
require the Department of Labor and Indus­
try to include work performed by licensed
electrical contractors and licensed master
plumbers in the wage survey used to deter­
mine the standard prevailing wage rate for
public works construction contracts.
The prevailing wage law was amended
to provide an exception from the require­
ment to pay standard prevailing wages for
an employer who, as a nonprofit organiza­
tion providing vocational rehabilitation, per­
forms a public works contract for non-con­
struction services and who employs an in­
dividual whose earning capacity is impaired
by a mental, emotional, or physical disabil­
ity if the employer conforms with the Fed­
eral Fair Labor Standards Act requirements
for the employment of workers with dis­
abilities and pays the individual wages that
are equal to or above the State’s minimum
wage.
The wage payment law was amended to
provide that on those occasions when an
employee submits a time sheet after the
employer’s established deadline for process­
ing time sheets for a specific time period and
the employer does not pay the employee
within the 10 business days provided for in
the statute, the employer may pay the em­
ployee the wages due in the ensuing pay
period. Employers may not withhold pay­
ment of the employee’s wages beyond the
next ensuing pay period. If there is not an
established time period or time when the
wages are due and payable, the pay period is
presumed to be semimonthly.
Child labor. The Department of Labor and
Industry is now authorized rather than re­
quired to adopt rules to implement and to
prevent circumvention or evasion of the child
labor standards act.
Worker privacy. A law was repealed that
had placed limits on the liability of nonpublic
employers who disclosed employment in­
formation. The law had provided that a
nonpublic employer who provided informa­
tion about a former or current employee’s
employment-related performance to a pro­
spective employer of the employee upon
request of the prospective employer or
former or current employee would not be
liable for civil damages for the disclosure or
any consequences related to the disclosure
unless the employer knowingly, purposely,
or negligently disclosed information that was
false.

Employee leasing. The professional em­
ployer organizations and groups licensing
law was amended to exempt from coverage
arrangements by healthcare facilities to pro­
vide their own employees to perform ser­
vices at an d/or on b e h a lf o f ano th er
healthcare facility or at and on behalf of a
private office of physicians, dentists, or
other licensed and regulated physical or
mental healthcare workers.
Preference. The law providing for a public
employment hiring preference for eligible
former or current members of the United
States Armed Forces was amended to extend
the hiring preference to former or current
members of the Montana army or air na­
tional guard who have satisfactorily com­
pleted a minimum of 6 years service in the
Armed Forces, the last 3 years of which have
been served in the Montana army or air na­
tional guard.
The law providing a preference for State
residents for employment on State construc­
tion projects was amended to ensure that at
least 50 percent of workers of each contrac­
tor performing labor on a State construction
project are bona fide Montana residents if
qualified personnel are available. Previously,
contractors, subcontractors, or employers
were required to ensure that at least 50 per­
cent of the work be performed by State resi­
dents on the entire project. The preference
requirement applies to any State construc­
tion project funded by State or Federal funds,
except a project partially funded with Fed­
eral aid money from the United States De­
partment of Transportation or when resi­
dency preference laws are specifically pro­
hibited by Federal law.

Nebraska
Equal employment opportunity. The Fair
Employment Practice Act was amended to
revise provisions relating to hearings before
the Equal Opportunity Commission. It was
specified that individuals who have suffered
physical, emotional, or financial harm be­
cause of whistleblower protection provision
violations are added to the list of those com­
plainants who are entitled to, at any stage of
the proceedings prior to dismissal, file an
action directly in the district court of the
county where the alleged violation occurred.
The deadline for filing an action directly in
the district court is 90 days after the com­
plainant receives notice of the last action the
commission will take on the complaint or
charge. When entering the last action, the
commission is to issue written notice of the
90-day deadline to the complainant by certi­
fied mail. The last action on the complaint

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

19

State Labor Laws, 2003

or charge includes the issuance of the final
order after hearing, the determination of rea­
sonable cause or no reasonable cause, and
any other administrative action that ends the
commission’s involvement.
Other laws. A Non-English-Speaking Work­
ers Protection Act was adopted, merging the
functions of the existing Meatpacking In­
dustry Worker Rights Coordinator position
and the Non-English-Speaking workers pro­
gram to achieve General Fund expenditure
savings.
Canvassing board members or any other
election workers were added to coverage of
the law protecting judges, clerks of election,
precinct or district inspectors from dis­
charge, loss of pay, loss of overtime pay,
loss of sick leave, loss of vacation time, the
threat of any such action, or any other form
of penalty as a result of their absence from
work due to such service in any county if
reasonable notice has been given to the em­
ployer. An employer may reduce the pay of
an employee for each hour of work missed
by an amount equal to the hourly compen­
sation other than expenses paid to the em­
ployee by the county for such service.

Nevada
Wages. The law establishing the duties of
the Commissioner of Labor was amended to
provide that except where enforcement au­
thority is vested in another officer, board, or
commission, the Labor Commissioner is to
enforce all labor laws of the State, including
those relating to compensation, wages and
hours, occupational safety and health, and
public works projects, without regard to
whether an employee is lawfully or unlaw­
fully employed.
A resolution was adopted recognizing
April 15,2003, as Equal Pay Day in Nevada
and encouraging all employers in the State to
compensate all employees fairly, based on
an objective evaluation of their jobs, consid­
ering factors such as the skill, effort, respon­
sibility and working conditions required for
each job. The resolution also congratulates
public and private employers in Nevada for
ranking among the highest in the Nation in
paying their employees equal pay for equal
work.
The law relating to the payment of pre­
vailing wages on public works projects was
amended. Except, where the workers or
mechanics are covered by a collective bar­
gaining agreement which provides that the
mechanic or worker will work a scheduled
10 hours per day for 4 calendar days within
any scheduled workweek, contractors or
subcontractors are to pay mechanics or

20

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

workers employed by them on a public work
not less than one and one-half times the pre­
vailing rate of wages applicable to the class
of the mechanic or worker. This rate shall
apply whenever the mechanic or workman
works: 1) more than 40 hours in any sched­
uled workweek or 2) more than 8 hours in
any workday unless by mutual agreement
the mechanic or worker works a scheduled
10 hours per day for 4 calendar days in any
scheduled workweek.
The prevailing wage law was amended so
that a contractor engaged on a public work
shall forfeit a penalty of not less than $20
and not more than $50 for each calendar day,
or portion thereof, for each worker employed
on the project for which the contractor or
subcontractor willfully included inaccurate
or incomplete information in the monthly
record required to be submitted to the public
body. Similar penalties shall be assessed for
each day a worker employed on the project
is not reported by the contractor or any sub­
contractor up to a maximum of $ 1,000 for a
first violation and $5,000 for subsequent vio­
lations. If a violation involves more than one
provision of the law for the same worker,
the contractor shall forfeit the penalty as­
sessed for each violation. The Labor Com­
missioner may, for good cause shown, waive
or reduce any penalty imposed under the
Act.
The law relating to public works con­
tracts let by public bodies or the Depart­
ment of Transportation for the construction,
maintenance, or operation of transportation
facilities was amended to specify that con­
tracts awarded to design-build teams must
comply with the provisions of the law re­
quiring the payment of prevailing wage rates
on public works projects.
Child labor. A law was enacted providing
for the judicial approval of contracts for the
artistic, creative or athletic services or the
intellectual property of minors under age 18.
The term of such contracts may not extend
beyond 5 years from the date of approval by
the court. The contract must be shown to be
objectively fair and reasonable; consistent
with industry standards; consistent and in
compliance with the laws of Nevada, includ­
ing the laws governing the conduct and em­
ployment of minors; and in the best inter­
ests of the minor. Upon granting approval
of a contract, the court will issue an order
appointing a special guardian to receive and
hold from 15 to 50 percent of the net earn­
ings of the minor to be set aside for the ben­
efit of the minor. A contract approved by
the court may not later be disaffirmed by the
minor.

January 2004

Inmate labor. The section of the Depart­
ment of Corrections code pertaining to the
disposition of funds received from the op­
eration of conservation camps was amended
to make the State Forester Firewarden re­
sponsible for determining the amount of
wages that must be paid to offenders who
participate in conservation camps and who
perform work relating to fire fighting and
other work projects of conservation camps.
Department o f labor. Labor law provisions
enforced by the Commissioner for certain
violations of labor laws and regulations were
amended. Employers who violate a labor
law or regulation or refuse to furnish re­
quired information are guilty of a misde­
meanor and may now be assessed up to a
$500 administrative penalty for such viola­
tions in addition to other fines. Such per­
sons must be provided notice and an oppor­
tunity for a hearing before any fines are fi­
nalized. Additionally, employers may not
change an established regular payday or
place of payment unless, not fewer than 7
days before the change is made, affected
employees are provided with written no­
tice. It is now unlawful for an employer to
pay em ployees’ lower wages, salary, or
compensation than the amount earned when
the work was performed. Additionally,
employers may not decrease employees’
wages, salary, or compensation unless the
employer either provides written notice 7
days before the decrease or follows the pro­
visions of any collective bargaining agree­
ment in effect. The Commissioner may as­
sess a fine of not more than $5,000 for each
violation of these provisions.

New Jersey
Wages. The Delaware River and Bay au­
thority, which was created pursuant to the
“Delaware-New Jersey Compact,” is not to
pay less than the prevailing wage rate to
workers employed in the performance of
any construction contract undertaken in con­
nection with an authorized project. The pre­
vailing wage rate will be the rate determined
by the Commissioner of Labor under the
New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act.

New Mexico
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate from $4.25 to $5.15 per
hour on July 1,2003. The minimum wage rate
for employees who regularly receive more than
$30 a month in tips rose from $2.125 to $2,575
per hour. The employer may consider tips as
part of wages, but such a wage credit is not
to exceed 50 percent of the minimum wage.

The city of Santa Fe adopted a Living
Wage Ordinance that requires the payment
of a minimum wage rate by the city to all
full-time permanent workers employed by
the city, while complying with the Fair La­
bor Standards Act and the Bateman Act. The
minimum wage rate is also to be paid by
contractors for the city who employ more
than 25 workers that have a service or con­
struction contract with the city equal to or in
excess of $30,000, excluding the purchase of
goods; businesses receiving assistance relat­
ing to economic development in the form of
grants, subsidies, loan guarantees, or indus­
trial revenue bonds in excess of $25,000; and
businesses required to have a business li­
cense or registration from the city and, dur­
ing any given month, have 25 or more work­
ers, or in the case of non-profit entities that
have 25 or more workers. Beginning Janu­
ary 1,2004, the minimum wage will be $8.50
per hour with increases to $9.50 per hour
scheduled for January 1,2006, and to $ 10.50
per hour scheduled for January 1,2008. Be­
ginning January 1,2009, and each year there­
after, the minimum wage shall be adjusted
upward based upon the consumer price in­
dex. The value of health benefits and
childcare will be considered as an element of
wages.
An equal pay task force was appointed
by the Governor. The task force is to study
the extent of wage disparities, both in the
public and private sectors, between men and
women and between minorities and non-mi­
norities; study the factors that cause wage
disparities, including segregation between
men and women and between minorities and
non-minorities across and within occupa­
tions and professions, payment of lower
wages for female-dominated occupations,
child-rearing responsibilities and education
and training; study the consequences of
wage disparities on the State’s economy and
on families; and develop actions, including
legislation, that are likely to lead to the elimi­
nation and prevention of wage disparities.
A final report is to be presented to the Gov­
ernor and the legislature by December 15,
2003.
Equal employment opportunity. The Hu­
man Rights Act was amended to add dis­
crimination based on sexual orientation or
gender identity to the forms of unlawful
employment discrimination applicable to
employers, labor organizations, joint ap­
prenticeship com m ittees, and em ploy­
ment agencies. This provision is not to
be used to adopt or implement a quota on
the basis of sexual orientation or gender
identity.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Employee leasing. The law requiring regis­
tering and licensing of employee leasing con­
tractors does not apply to temporary work­
ers. The law was amended to define tempo­
rary services employers and to provide that
a worker who is employed by a temporary
services employer works and should be clas­
sified in any construction class or in any oil
and gas well service or drilling class under
Insurance Code regulations will be presumed
to be a temporary worker, and the tempo­
rary services employer that provides the
worker must comply with the provisions of
the Employee Leasing Act.

New York
Child labor. A law was enacted ensuring that
child performers who work in the State have
a portion of their earnings kept in a trust
account for them until the age of majority,
and that they are provided with an adequate
education. The child’s custodian or guardian
must establish the trust account within 15
days of the start of employment and notify
the child’s employer of the account’s exist­
ence. Employers must transfer 15 percent
of the gross pay to the child’s trust account
within 30 days after the end of employment
unless the period of employment is longer
than 30 days. In such a case, the funds must
be transferred every payroll period. The
child performer may terminate the trust ac­
count upon reaching the age of 18. Child
performer employment permits are valid for
6 months from date of issuance. To possess
such a permit the child must be in good edu­
cational standing. In those instances where
the child performer is unable to meet State
educational requirements because of the em­
ployment schedule, the employer is to pro­
vide a certified or State-recognized teacher
so that he or she may fulfill educational law
requirements.
The section of the child labor law estab­
lishing restrictions on the hours of work for
minors 16 and 17 years of age was amended
to exempt 17-year-old minors employed as
counselors, junior counselors, or counselorsin-training at camps for children during the
months of June, July, and August.
Apparel industry. The law that allows the
State University of New York and the City
University of New York to consider labor
standards when evaluating bids for school
apparel and uniforms was expanded to also
include bids for the purchase of sports equip­
ment including balls, bats, and other goods
intended for use by those participating in
sports and games. Labor standards to be
considered include employee compensation,

working conditions, employee rights to form
unions, and the use of child labor.

North Carolina
Wages. Obsolete provisions establishing a
training wage under the minimum wage law
were repealed.
An employee of the State may authorize,
in writing, a payroll deduction from his or
her salary or wages for deposit in the Paren­
tal Savings Trust Fund administered by the
State Education Assistance Authority.
A measure was enacted to permit a vote in
November 2004 to authorize a constitutional
amendment allowing units of local government
to borrow money to finance economic devel­
opment projects within a defined area. A de­
velopment financing plan would be required
to include a requirement that the initial users
of a new manufacturing facility to be located
in the district, and included in the plan must
pay its employees an average weekly manu­
facturing wage that is either above the average
manufacturing wage paid in the county in
which the district will be located or not less
than 10 percent above the average weekly
manufacturing wage paid in the State.
Child labor. A law was enacted regulating
contracts of minors for artistic, creative, or
athletic services including actors, actresses,
musicians, singers and other performers or
entertainers. The law provides for court
approval of contracts and for financial safe­
guards in court orders approving contracts
and in situations where there is no court or­
der. At least 15 percent of the minor’s gross
earnings pursuant to the contract are to be
set aside by the minor’s employer in trust, in
an account or other savings plan, and pre­
served for the benefit of the minor. Require­
ments were adopted for establishing a trust
and for appointing trustees.
Private employment agencies. A law was
enacted abolishing the Labor Commissioner’s
Private Personnel Service Advisory Council
that had performed duties related to the pri­
vate personnel service industry. The Com­
missioner is now authorized to adopt rules
necessary to carry out and administer the
provisions of the law dealing with the per­
sonnel service industry including those in­
volving hearings, penalties, and criminal pen­
alties for violations of the law. Such penal­
ties can include the denial, suspension, revo­
cation of a license issued under the law, or
the levying of a fine not to exceed $250. The
licensee will be notified in writing of the de­
nial, revocation, or suspension via a letter
signed by the Commissioner or designee, and
will have the right to appeal the decision.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

21

State Labor Laws, 2003

Other laws. Among amendments to the law
establishing and regulating the Board of
Nursing, it was specified that before hiring a
registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse
in the State, a healthcare facility must verify
that the applicant has a current, valid license
to practice nursing.
A member of a volunteer fire department,
rescue squad, or emergency medical services
agency called into service of the State after a
proclamation of a state of disaster by the
Governor or the General Assembly, or upon
the activation of the State Emergency Re­
sponse Team in response to a disaster or
emergency, will have the right to take leave
without pay from his or her civilian employ­
ment. No such individual will be forced to
use or exhaust his or her vacation or other
accrued leave from his or her civilian em­
ployment for a period of active service. For
the volunteer member to be entitled to take
leave without pay, his or her services must
be requested in writing by the Director of
the Division of Emergency Management or
by the head of a local Emergency Manage­
ment Agency. The request is to be directed
to the Chief of the member’s volunteer fire
department, rescue squad, or emergency
medical services agency, and a copy is to be
provided to the member’s employer. The
law will not apply to those members whose
services have been certified by their em­
ployer as essential to the employer’s own on­
going emergency or disaster relief activities.
The State Board of Education is to adopt
rules relating to leaves of absence, without
loss of pay or time, for periods of military
training and for State or Federal military
duty or for special emergency management
service. The rules will apply to all public
school employees employed by local boards
o f education or by charter schools. The
rules will provide that (1) the State pays
any salary differential to all public school
employees in State-funded positions; (2)
the employing local board of education pays
any pay differential to all public school em­
ployees in locally funded positions; (3) the
employing charter school pays any pay dif­
ferential to all public school employees in
the charter school; and (4) the employing
local board of education pays the local
supplement.

North Dakota
Wages. The section of the wage collection
law relating to direct deposit of wages was
amended to eliminate a provision that had
prohibited employers from requiring em­
ployees to receive their pay by direct de­
posit into a financial institution. The law
now provides that payment will be made in

22

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

lawful money of the United States, by check
or by direct deposit in the financial institu­
tion of the employee’s choice.

amount for reconstruction, remodeling, or
renovation increased from $18,764 to
$19,752.

Worker privacy. The law relating to confi­
dentiality of central personnel division me­
diation service records was amended. Divi­
sion records relating to its mediation ser­
vices are now exempt from the law that
identifies these records as public records,
and as such, open and accessible for inspec­
tion during reasonable office hours. Addi­
tionally, an em ployee may not be dis­
charged, disciplined, or penalized concern­
ing his or her compensation, conditions, lo­
cation, or other privileges of employment
because of the employee’s request for or
participation in the mediation services pro­
vided by the division.

Worker privacy. The law regarding privacy
of peace officer records was amended to in­
clude the positions of firefighters and emer­
gency medical technicians ( e m t ). Firefighter
is defined as any regular, paid, or volunteer,
member of a lawfully constituted fire depart­
ment of a municipal corporation, township,
fire district or village, e m t is defined as an
e m t -1, EMT-basic and paramedics that pro­
vide emergency medical services for a public
emergency medical service organization.
Residential and familial information is not to
be included in the public record. This in­
cludes the employee’s name, residential ad­
dress and phone number, name and address
of employer, social security number, bank
account, debit card, charge card or credit card
number, the name of any beneficiary of em­
ployment benefits, emergency telephone
number of spouse, a former spouse, or any
child of a firefighter or e m t .

Workplace security. The Information Tech­
nology Department was authorized to re­
quire as a condition of employment that in­
dividuals who have unescorted physical ac­
cess to the facilities or other security-sensi­
tive areas of the department be fingerprinted
and subject to security background checks.
Private employment agencies. The State em­
ployment agency licensing law was amended
to stipulate that employment agencies are
not subject to licensure if they charge fees
exclusively to employers.
Other laws. The section of law relating to
the authority of the labor commissioner to
adopt rules on wages and working conditions
in the State was amended to clarify that or­
ders issued by the Commissioner of Labor
must be promulgated as administrative rules
under the Administrative Practices Act to
have the force and effect of law. Provisions
were repealed relating to the commissioner
calling conferences of employers, employee
representatives, and the public to consider
and make recommendations concerning
changes in hours, minimum wages, and work­
ing conditions, and to issue orders based on
these recommendations.

Oklahoma
Wages. An employer who is found to have
violated the State wage payment law on two
or more occasions within any 6-month pe­
riod may be assessed an administrative fine
of $500 per violation. Previously, the fine
could be imposed only in instances of two or
more knowing violations.
Worker privacy. Employers who conduct
employee-owned vehicle searches of their
employees must conduct the searches on
their own property. Searches that are con­
ducted on property not owned or rented by
the employer will require a search warrant
issued according to law.
Whistleblower. The Whistleblower Act was
amended to provide that a State agency may
not take disciplinary action against an em­
ployee who discusses the operations and
functions of the agency with the print or
electronic media.

Ohio

Oregon

Wages. By law, threshold amounts for con­
tract coverage under the State prevailing
wage law are adjusted every 2 years accord­
ing to the change in the Census Bureau’s Im­
plicit Price Deflator for Construction, pro­
vided that no increase or decrease exceeds 6
percent for the 2-year period. As a result,
effective January 1, 2004, the threshold
amount for new construction rose from
$62,549 to $65,843 and the threshold

Wages. A minimum wage ballot initiative
was approved by the voters in the Novem­
ber 2002 general election. It provided for an
increase in the State minimum wage rate from
$6.50 per hour to $6.90 on January 1,2003.
It also provided that beginning January 1,
2004, and annually thereafter, the rate will
be adjusted for inflation based on data from
the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Con­
sumer Price Index. As a result, the rate was

January 2004

increased to $7.05 per hour on January 1,
2004.
The law establishing a penalty for failure
to pay wages upon termination of employ­
ment was amended to limit the penalty wage
liability of businesses that primarily sell
motor vehicles or farm implements in the
case of employees paid on a commission
basis where there is a dispute between the
employer and the employee regarding the
am ount of com m ission due upon the
em ployee’s term ination, and where the
amount of unpaid commission ultimately
found due is less than 20 percent of the
amount of unpaid commission claimed by
the employee. In these cases, the penalty
wage liability of the employer may not ex­
ceed the amount of the unpaid commission
or $200, whichever is greater. These penalty
limitations do not apply if the employer has
violated final pay provisions one or more
times in the preceding year, or when an em­
ployer terminated one or more other employ­
ees on the same date that the employee’s
employment ceased.
The law relating to the Oregon Youth
Conservation Corps was amended to specify
that corps members are exempt from the
State public works prevailing wage law.
Family issues. Employers of 6 or more per­
sons in the State are to provide leave from
employment to attend criminal proceedings
for eligible employees who have been crime
victims or who have an immediate family
member who has been a crime victim. The
leave may be unpaid; however, paid accrued
vacation leave or other paid accrued leave
may be used. Reasonable notice is to be
given to the employer, and the amount of
leave that an employee takes may be limited
by the employer if the employee’s absence
creates an undue hardship to the employer’s
business. An employee is eligible if he or she
has worked an average of more than 25 hours
per week for a covered employer for at least
180 days immediately before the date that
the employee takes leave to attend a criminal
proceeding. An employer who denies leave
to an employee or who discharges, threatens
to discharge, intimidates or coerces an em­
ployee because he or she takes this leave
commits an unlawful employment practice
and is subject to a civil action.
Worker privacy. A law was enacted prohib­
iting public bodies (State, local, and special
government bodies) from disclosing the iden­
tification badge or card of an employee of
the public body without the written consent
of the employee when the badge or card con­
tains the photograph of the employee and it


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

was prepared solely for internal use by the
public body to identify employees of the
public body. Additionally, the public body
may not disclose a duplicate of the photo­
graph on the badge or card.
The Board of Public Safety Standards
and Training and the Department of Public
Safety Standards and Training may not dis­
close a photograph of a public safety of­
ficer without the written consent of the of­
ficer or his or her employer. A public safety
agency is to provide the department with
access to personnel records of an employee
or former employee of the public service
agency if the department requests access to
the records; the department is conducting
an investigation relating to the employee or
former employee’s qualifications for em­
ployment, training or certification as a pub­
lic safety officer; and the records are related
to the issue being investigated. A public
safety agency that discloses this informa­
tion is presumed to be acting in good faith
and, unless lack of good faith is shown by a
preponderance of the evidence, is immune
from civil liability for the disclosure or its
consequences.
Private employment agencies. The act regu­
lating employment agencies was amended to
specifically exclude employment listing ser­
vices from coverage. An employment listing
service is defined as a business that provides
lists of specified positions available with an
employer other than the service or that holds
itself out to individuals as able to provide
information about specific positions of em­
ployment with an employer other than the
employment listing service; charges an indi­
vidual a fee for its services; and does not
arrange interviews or otherwise intercede be­
tween an individual and a prospective em­
ployer but may offer limited counseling and
employment-related services to an individual
that includes, but is not limited to, personal
grooming and appearance and interview
preparation. The Commissioner of the Bu­
reau of Labor and Industries is to adopt rules
governing term s of contracts and fees
charged. The service is to make contract and
fee schedule information available to clients.
Other laws. The law governing State militia
duty, pay, allowances, and re-employment
rights was amended to provide that mem­
bers of the organized militia while on active
State duty, for reasons including those re­
lated to homeland security, will receive not
less than the pay and allowances of their
corresponding grades of the Armed Forces
of the United States. Those members of the
organized State militia who are ordered to

active State duty will be considered tempo­
rary employees of the military department
except that they are not subject to the collec­
tive bargaining and arbitration rules and regu­
lations that apply to public or private em­
ployees w ithin the S tate. W hen the
employee’s leave of absence for active ser­
vice of the State is terminated, the employee
is to return to his or her employment within
7 calendar days.
The State law regarding benefits for State
employees or public officers while absent
on military leave was amended. The State
will provide coverage under an employersponsored health plan to a public officer or
employee of the State for a period not ex­
ceeding a total of 12 months while the indi­
vidual is absent on leave. This applies both
to individuals serving in the United States
Armed Forces and to employees who are
members of the organized State militia who
are called into active service of the State by
the Governor. Employers other than the
State may provide such coverage. The posi­
tion of an employee serving in the United
States armed services will not become va­
cant nor shall the officer or employee be sub­
ject to removal as a consequence of such ser­
vice unless it exceeds 5 years.

Pennsylvania
Wages. A resolution was adopted designat­
ing April 15, 2003, as “Equal Pay Day” in
Pennsylvania and encouraging all residents
to support and maintain pay equity through­
out the Commonwealth.
Equal employment opportunity. An Execu­
tive order was issued barring State agencies
from discrim inating against em ployees
based on their gender identity, adding
transgendered people to the list of those
rights are protected. The order adds “gen­
der identity or expression” to the list that
also includes race, color, religious creed, an­
cestry, union membership, age, gender,
sexual orientation, national origin, AIDS or
h iv status, or disability.
An Executive order was issued reestab­
lishing the Pennsylvania Commission for
Women. Duties and functions of the com­
mission include monitoring women’s educa­
tional and employment needs and opportu­
nities; promoting job training, educational
programs and upward mobility for women;
encouraging the development of and access
to funding for small business enterprises
owned or operated by women; issuing peri­
odic reports on new State laws, regulations
and governmental policies affecting women;
serving as a liaison between government and
nongovernmental groups and organizations

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

23

State Labor Laws, 2003

whose purposes relate to the interests of
women; and, as appropriate, providing to
the Governor and the General Assembly re­
ports and recommendations for legislative or
other governmental action.
Plant closing. A resolution was adopted ask­
ing the President and U.S. Congress to take
all necessary action to preserve the
healthcare benefits of steel industry retirees
and retirees in other similarly affected indus­
tries where there have been massive layoffs
or plant closings.

Rhode Island
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate from $6.15 to $6.75 per
hour on January 1, 2004.
A resolution was adopted declaring April
3, 2003, to be “Rhode Island Pay Equity
Day” and asking all Rhode Islanders to join
in urging all other States to establish equi­
table compensation that eliminates sex and
race-based wage discrimination.

National Guard units or activated reserve
units, or members of National Guard Units
who have volunteered for active duty in “Op­
eration Enduring Freedom,” “Operation
Noble Eagle,” or “Operation Iraqi Freedom,”
or any combination of these duties, were au­
thorized to use up to 45 days of accumu­
lated annual leave in 2003 in connection with
absences resulting from the military service.
In addition, such employees were authorized
to use up to 90 days of accrued sick leave in
calendar year 2003 as if it were annual leave
without regard to the 30-day limit on annual
leave that may otherwise be used in a year.

South Dakota
Equal employment opportunity. The ban on
sex discrimination in employment will not
prevent a school district from considering
the sex of an employee in relation to em­
ployment duties in a locker room or toilet
facility used only by members of one sex.

Tennessee
Family issues. Employers, including the
State and any political subdivision of the
State, may provide reasonable unpaid break
time each day to an employee who needs to
breastfeed or express breast milk for her in­
fant child to maintain milk supply and com­
fort. The break time must, if possible, run
concurrently with any break time already
provided to the employee. An employer is
not required to provide break time if to do so
would create an undue hardship on the
employer’s operations. An employer must
make a reasonable effort to provide a pri­
vate, secure and sanitary room or other loca­
tion in close proximity to the work area,
other than a toilet stall, where an employee
can express her milk or breastfeed her child.
Equal employment opportunity. It was made
an unlawful employment practice for any
employer, when an employee has presented
to the employer an internal complaint alleg­
ing harassment in the workplace on the basis
of race or color, religion, sex, disability, age,
sexual orientation, gender identity or expres­
sion, or country of ancestral origin, to refuse
to disclose in a timely manner in writing to
that employee the disposition of the com­
plaint, including a description of any action
taken in resolution of the complaint. Pro­
vided, however, no other personnel informa­
tion will be disclosed to the complainant.

South Carolina
Other laws. Permanent full-time State em­
ployees who are members of Federalized

24

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Wages. Amendments to the wage payment
law specify that the civil penalty applicable
to second and subsequent violations of re­
quirements regarding payment of compen­
sation for employees in private employment
or misrepresentation of wages for such em­
ployment may be assessed at the discretion
o f the C om m issioner o f L abor and
Workforce Development, and that the com­
missioner is to provide the employer with
30 days’ notice and an opportunity for a
hearing prior to the imposition of any civil
penalty. If an employer fails to notify the
commissioner in writing within 30 days
from the receipt of notification of penalties
of its intent to contest the imposition of a
penalty, the assessment of the penalty as
stated in the notification will be deemed a
final order of the commissioner and not sub­
ject to further review. All penalties owed
are to be paid to the commissioner.
Child labor. Amendments to the child labor
law provide that the civil penalty applicable
to second or subsequent law violations may
be assessed at the discretion of the Commis­
sioner of Labor and Workforce Development,
and that if an employer fails to notify the
commissioner in writing within 30 days from
the receipt of notification of penalties of its
intent to contest the imposition of a penalty,
the assessment of the penalty as stated in
the notification will be deemed a final order
of the commissioner and not subject to fur­
ther review. All penalties owed are to be
paid to the commissioner.

January 2004

The State child labor law was amended by
establishing requirements on contracts entered
into on behalf of entertainers under the age of
18. The law pertains to every minor who
desires to perform artistic and creative ser­
vices in the State. The minor, parent, or guard­
ian, are required to petition the court for ap­
proval of a contract for such services. Peti­
tions will be filed in the probate court of the
county where the minor resides or performs.
If approved, the minor will not be allowed to
disaffirm the contract on the grounds of mi­
nority status or grounds that the parent or
guardian lacked personal authority. Upon con­
tract approval, all types of earnings become
the sole property of the minor. There is a
court requirement that 15 percent of the
minor’s gross earnings be placed in trust for
the minor’s benefit; and the minor or the par­
ents or guardian may request that an addi­
tional percentage be placed in trust. Courtapproved contracts will include all require­
ments for rendering of the minor’s services
and protect the interest of the minor. The
court may revoke approval or modify the con­
tract if necessary to protect the physical or
mental well-being of the minor.
Equal employment opportunity. Administra­
tion of title V of the Federal Older Ameri­
cans Act was transferred from the Commis­
sion on Aging and Disability to the Depart­
ment of Labor and Workforce Development.
Existing funding to community providers
will continue so long as the Federal funding
continues and providers meet program goals.
The complaint procedure was revised for
persons claiming to be aggrieved by a dis­
criminatory practice, on the basis of race,
color, or national origin, under Title VI of the
Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. Enforce­
ment duties and powers were transferred
from the Human Rights Commission to the
Title VI Compliance Commission.
The Governor issued an Executive order
directing that no State executive branch
agency, department, board, or commission
is to discriminate in employment on the
basis of race, religion, gender, age, handicap,
or national origin. The order also creates
the G overnor’s Advisory Committee on
Equal and Fair Employment Opportunity.
This committee will monitor the implemen­
tation of this Executive order and regularly
review the State’s progress in achieving fair
and equal employment opportunity, and
advise the Governor on the level of compli­
ance and additional actions needed to enable
the State to fulfill the mandate of the Execu­
tive order. This Executive order supersedes
and rescinds Executive Order No. 2, signed
February 27, 1995.

Worker privacy. Among several changes in
the law governing the licensure of polygraph
examiners, provisions were eliminated which
had required that, in employment examina­
tions, each prospective examinee be shown a
list of the questions to be asked and that the
questions be reviewed with the examinee
prior to the commencement of the examina­
tion, and that each prospective examinee be
shown a list of those areas that the examina­
tion will not cover.
The law dealing with the confidentiality
of public records was amended to provide
that an employee of the Department of Cor­
rection is to be allowed to inspect investiga­
tive records of the Internal Affairs Division
of the Department of Correction prior to a
due process hearing at which disciplinary ac­
tion is considered or issued unless the com­
missioner specifically denies in writing the
employee’s request to examine the records
prior to the hearing.
Other laws. A law was enacted prohibiting
the termination of an employee who is a vol­
unteer firefighter due to his or her absence or
lateness to work because of responding to an
emergency. Any employee who is termi­
nated in violation of this law may bring a
civil action against the employer within 1
year from the date of the violation seeking
reinstatement, payment of back wages, and
reinstatement of fringe benefits and senior­
ity rights. An employer may charge any time
that an employee loses from employment
because of his or her response to an emer­
gency against the employee’s regular pay.
The employer also has the right to request
an employee, who loses time for such rea­
son, to provide a written statement from the
supervisor or acting supervisor of the volun­
teer fire department stating that the em­
ployee responded to an emergency and list­
ing the time and date of the emergency.

Texas
Wages. A law was enacted specifying that
the hourly rate provided for in the State mini­
mum wage law supersedes a wage established
in an ordinance, order, or charter provision
governing wages in private employment,
other than wages under a public contract.
This provision does not apply to any State
or Federal job training or workplace devel­
opment program or to a minimum wage es­
tablished by a government entity that ap­
plies to a contract or agreement entered into
by a government entity and a private entity.
The wage payment law was amended to
authorize employers to pay wages by direct
deposit to employees who maintain accounts
at financial institutions that qualify for elec­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

tronic funds transfer. An employer who
wants to pay wages through a direct deposit
plan must notify each affected employee, in
writing, at least 60 days before the date on
which the direct deposit payroll system is
scheduled to begin, that the employer is
adopting a direct deposit payroll system, and
obtain from the employee any information
required by the financial institution in which
the employee maintains the account that is
necessary to implement the electronic funds
transfer.
Payroll deductions from the wages of
county employees previously limited to
payments to a credit union, payment of la­
bor union or employee association member­
ship dues, payment of fees for parking in a
county-owned facility, or payments to a
charitable organization, may now be autho­
rized for other approved purposes.
Cash paid as wages will now be presumed
abandoned if, for longer than 6 months if the
amount is $100 or less, or for longer than 3
years if greater than $ 100 provided the exist­
ence and location of the employee or former
employee to whom the wages are owed is
unknown to the employer and a wage claim
has not been filed under the wage payment
law. A check paid as wages for $ 100 or less
is presumed to be abandoned on the latest
of: (1) the 180th day after the check was
payable; (2) the 180th day after the date the
issuer of the check last received documented
communication from the payee; or (3) the
180th day after the date the check was is­
sued if, during that period, a claim to the
check has not been asserted or an act of own­
ership by the payee has not been exercised.
A check for wages for more than $100 is
presumed abandoned on the latest of: (1) the
3rd anniversary of the date the check was
payable; (2) the 3rd anniversary of the date
the issuer of the check last received docu­
mented communication from the payee of
the check; or (3) the 3rd anniversary of the
date the check was issued if, during that pe­
riod, a claim to the check has not been as­
serted or an act of ownership by the payee
has not been exercised.
Among several amendments to the In­
dustrial Development Corporation Act, it
was specified that a corporation may spend
tax revenue received under the act for job
training offered through a business enterprise
only if the business enterprise has commit­
ted in writing to create new jobs that pay
wages that are at least equal to the prevailing
wage for the applicable occupation in the
local labor market area, or to increase its pay­
roll to pay wages that are at least equal to the
prevailing wage for the applicable occupa­
tion in the local labor market area.

Family issues. Limited compensation will
be provided to an immediate family member
of a deceased violent crime victim for travel
expenses associated with attending the fu­
neral or for lost wages resulting from bereave­
ment leave, taken in connection with the
death of the victim, for up to 10 work days,
or a maximum of $ 1,000.
Child labor. The Alcoholic beverage law was
amended to authorize the holder of a permit
or license providing for the on-premises con­
sumption of alcoholic beverages, who also
holds a food and beverage certificate, to em­
ploy a person under 18 years of age to work
as a cashier for transactions involving the
sale of alcoholic beverages if the alcoholic
beverages are served by a person 18 years of
age or older.
Equal employment opportunity. The Com­
mission on Human Rights was abolished,
and its powers, duties, functions and activi­
ties were transferred to the Texas Workforce
Commission, Civil Rights Division. By No­
vember 1, 2003, the Governor was to have
appointed members to a new Human Rights
Commission that will be responsible for gov­
erning the Civil Rights Division, with au­
thority to grant or seek relief from an unlaw­
ful employment practice, or to institute
criminal proceedings.
Genetic testing. A person who unlawfully
discloses genetic information will now be li­
able for a civil penalty of up to $ 10,000. The
attorney general may bring an action in the
name of the State to recover the penalty, plus
reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.
Workplace security. A commercial nuclear
power plant licensee and its contractors, for
security reasons and consistent with require­
ments of the United States Nuclear Regula­
tory Commission, are entitled to obtain
criminal history record information, from the
Department of Public Safety, that relates to
a person who has or is seeking employment
at or access to a commercial nuclear power
plant.
Employee leasing. The law regulating staff
leasing companies was amended to provide
that a client company is solely obligated to
pay any wages for which obligation to pay
is created by an agreement, contract, plan, or
policy between the client company and the
assigned employee, and the staff leasing com­
pany has not contracted to pay. The staff
leasing company is to disclose this informa­
tion to all its assigned employees. Prior law
required the staff leasing company to take

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

25

State Labor Laws, 2003

the responsibility of paying assigned em­
ployees’ wages even if they had not con­
tracted for such payments.
Department o f labor. Legislation was en­
acted extending the Texas Workforce Com­
mission through September 1,2009. Among
other provisions, it also adopted guidelines
regarding the functions of the commission,
amended the qualifications for commission
members, revised the grounds for removal
from the commission, and established mem­
ber training requirements.
All functions and activities performed by
the Texas Department of Licensing and
Regulation relating to conducting adminis­
trative hearings at the department were trans­
ferred to the State Office of Administrative
Hearings.
The requirement, under dispute resolu­
tion procedures, that the Texas Workforce
Commission enter an order in accordance
with the final determination of an action un­
der the Judicial Review of Commission De­
cision subchapter was repealed.
Other laws. An addition to the Penal Code
makes it unlawful for a person to know­
ingly traffic another person with the intent
that the trafficked person engage in forced
labor or services or in prostitution or child
pornography. An offense will be a felony
of the second degree, except that it will be a
felony of the first degree if the offense in­
volves prostitution or child pornography
and the person who is trafficked is younger
than age 14, or if the commission of the
offense results in the death of the person
who is trafficked. “Traffic” means to trans­
port another person or to entice, recruit,
harbor, provide, or otherwise obtain an­
other person for transport by deception,
coercion, or force.
The law establishing guidelines relating
to acceptable off-duty employment by com­
missioned officers of the Texas Department
of Public safety was amended to specify that
the guidelines are to be applied uniformly to
all supervisory and non-supervisory com­
missioned officers, and to provide that if the
department denies approval of an officer’s
secondary employment or proposed second­
ary em ploym ent, he or she m ust be
promptly notified in writing of the specific
guideline on which the department’s deci­
sion was based and why the employment is
prohibited by the guideline.
A member of the State military forces,
who is ordered to active State duty by the
Governor or by other proper authority un­
der State law, will now be entitled to the
same benefits and protections as those pro­

26

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

vided to certain persons in the uniformed
services and military service of the United
States including protection from job dis­
crimination and reemployment rights when
returning from active duty.
A person who is called to active military
duty as a member of the Texas National
Guard in the service of the State or the
United States and who suffers an economic
hardship as a result of serving on active duty
will now be eligible to receive supplemental
pay. The comptroller is to establish the
Texas National Guard members’ supplemen­
tal active duty pay account in the general
revenue fund. A Guard member may receive
an amount, to be determined by the adjutant
general, not to exceed the lesser of the amount
required to alleviate the economic hardship
the member suffers as a result of serving on
active duty, or the difference between the
amount of income that the member has lost
from civilian employment as a result of be­
ing called to active duty and the amount of
military pay and allowances the member re­
ceives from State or Federal sources while
on active duty.
Employees of the State called to ac­
tive duty during a national emergency to
serve in a reserve component of the Armed
Forces may use any accrued vacation
leave, earned compensatory leave, or over­
time leave to maintain benefits for the
employee or his or her dependents while
on military duty. The State agency is to
grant sufficient emergency leave as differ­
ential pay to a State employee on unpaid
military leave if the em ployee’s military
gross pay is less than the em ployee’s
State gross pay. The com bination of
emergency leave and military pay may not
exceed the em ployee’s actual State gross
pay.
If a municipal or county employee who
is a member of a reserve component of the
Armed Forces of the United States, includ­
ing any part of the State military forces, is
called to active military duty and subse­
quently exhausts all military leave to which
he or she is entitled under State law, the mu­
nicipality or county may continue the
individual’s salary payments until the per­
son is no longer on active duty.
If a firefighter or police officer employed
by a municipality is called to active military
duty for any period of time, his or her em­
ployer must continue to maintain any health,
dental, or life insurance coverage and any
health or dental benefits coverage that the
firefighter or police officer received through
the municipality on the date he or she was
called to active military duty until the mu­
nicipality receives written instructions from

January 2004

the firefighter or police officer to change or
discontinue the coverage. A firefighter or
police officer may, without restrictions as to
the amount of time, voluntarily substitute
for a firefighter or police officer who has been
called to active Federal military duty for a
period expected to last 12 months or longer.
Municipalities are to maintain military leave
time accounts to receive and distribute do­
nated leave.
The Education Code was amended to
provide that a school district employee with
available personal leave is entitled to use
the leave for compensation during a term of
active military service. In addition, school
districts were authorized to adopt a policy
providing for the paid leave of absence of
employees taking leave for active military
service.

Utah
Wages. The section of the minimum wage
law establishing the wage rate for employees
who regularly receive tips was amended to
delete a provision that tipped employees
could be paid not less than 55 percent of the
minimum wage when the balance received
from tips was sufficient to bring the em­
ployee to the minimum wage. The law now
refers to the cash wage obligation established
by administrative rule that matches the Fed­
eral minimum cash wage of $2.13 per hour.
The Department of Human Resource
Management was directed to conduct a
study regarding salary data related to
whether or not compensation paid to State
employees differs between genders. A re­
port, including any proposed legislation,
was to be made to the Government Opera­
tions Interim Committee during the 2003
interim. Benchmark positions were to be
established and examined for factors includ­
ing for the percentage of each gender in the
position, the average length of employment
by the State and in each position for each
gender, and the average salary of male and
female employees. The study was also to
examine the percentage of part-time State
employees of each gender.
The section of the payment of wages law
prohibiting retaliation against an employee
who files or is about to file a complaint, who
testifies or is about to testify in an enforce­
ment proceeding, or who the employer be­
lieves may file a complaint or testify was
amended. Previously, the law protected
employees from discharge or threat of dis­
charge. It now prohibits discharge, demo­
tion, or any other form of retaliation against
an employee in the terms, privileges, or con­
ditions of employment.

Equal employment opportunity. Among
amendments to the Antidiscrimination Act, the
procedure for an aggrieved person to file a
claim was revised to authorize the Antidis­
crimination and Labor Division to transfer a
request for agency action filed with the divi­
sion to the Federal Equal Employment Op­
portunity Commission (e e o c ) in accordance
with any work share agreement that exists
between the division and the e e o c and that is
in effect on the day on which the agency ac­
tion request is transferred. This transfer is
considered the commencement of an action
under Federal law. The director may issue a
determination and order to the respondent to
cease any discriminatory or prohibited em­
ployment practice and provide relief to the
aggrieved party as is determined appropriate.
Worker privacy. Current or former employ­
ers of law enforcement and training academy
applicants are now required to provide em­
ployment history information to the law en­
forcement agency or academy if proper no­
tice and authorization procedures are fol­
lowed. Information provided may include
dates of employment, compensation paid,
attendance record, any disciplinary action
taken, and a statement regarding whether the
employer would rehire the applicant and, if
not, the reasons why. In the absence of fraud
or malice, an employer is not subject to any
civil liability resulting from the release of the
information requested.
Workplace violence!security. Political subdi­
visions of the State that operate public water
systems were authorized to require prospec­
tive and current employees and contractors
and those seeking access to public water sys­
tem facilities to submit to a criminal back­
ground check. If employment is denied or
terminated because of information obtained
through a criminal background check, the pub­
lic water utility must notify the person in
writing of the reasons for denial or termina­
tion and give him or her an opportunity to
respond to the reasons and to seek review of
the denial or termination through established
administrative procedures.
Employee leasing. The law requiring the li­
censing of professional employer organiza­
tions was amended to now provide for an­
nual registration rather than licensing. It also
eliminated the Professional Employer Orga­
nization Board, established qualifications for
registration and specified the information to
be filed by registrants. A professional em­
ployer organization that is domiciled out­
side of the State and employs less than 50
employees who are employed or domiciled


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

in the State is not required to file the entity
information.
Inmate labor. The section of the Code of
Criminal Procedure regarding court-ordered
restitution to crime victims was amended to
permit the court to award up to 5 days of
the individual victim’s wages that were lost
due to the theft or damage to tools or equip­
ment items of a trade that were owned by
the victim and were essential to his or her
employment.
Other laws. The Labor Commission is to
assume certain responsibilities relating to
coal mine certification and fee collection that
were previously performed by the Labor
Commission’s Safety Division.
The law providing State employees with
a pay allowance for time spent on duty in
the United States Armed Forces or the Utah
National Guard was amended to also apply
to county and municipal employees. These
employees may be allowed up to full pay
for all time not in excess of 15 days a year
spent on duty at annual encampment or rifle
competition or other duties in connection
with the reserve training and instruction re­
quirements. This leave is at the discretion of
the employing county or municipality and,
if granted, shall be in addition to annual vaca­
tion leave with pay.

Vermont
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate from $6.25 to $6.75 per
hour on January 1, 2004, with a further in­
crease to $7 per hour scheduled for January
1, 2005. An employer in the hotel, motel,
tourist place, and restaurant industry may
not employ a service or tipped employee at
a wage rate less than $3.58 an hour. Begin­
ning on January 1, 2005, this rate is sched­
uled to rise to $3.65 an hour, and thereafter
to a rate to be determined when the basic
minimum wage rate is increased. A “service
or tipped employee” is defined as all those,
in either hotels, motels, tourist places, and
restaurants who customarily and regularly
receive more than $30 per month in tips for
direct and personal customer service.
Child labor. A resolution was adopted des­
ignating March 26, 2003, as Child Labor
Awareness Day in Vermont.
Equal employment opportunity. The manda­
tory retirement age for justices of the State
Supreme Court and judges of all subordinate
courts was raised from 70 to 90.

Virginia
Wages. The law relating to the payment
of wages was amended to permit wages to
be paid into a trust account on which the
employee is a named beneficiary. Such
payment must be with the consent of the
employee.
Child labor. The minimum age was reduced
from 13 to 12 for children to be exempt
from the child labor law (except for those
sections prohibiting work that is hazardous
to health or morals) for employment as
sports referees by a charity organization, a
unit of state or local government, or for an
organization of referees, sponsored by an
organization recognized by the U.S. Olym­
pic Committee.
Equal employment opportunity. The section
of the Freedom of Information Act relating
to record exemption for employment dis­
crimination investigations was amended to
expand the record exemption for investiga­
tor notes, correspondence and information,
which is furnished in confidence with respect
to an active investigation of individual em­
ployment discrimination complaints that are
made to the Department of Human Resource
Management to include any such investiga­
tions conducted by personnel of the local
governing body who are authorized by law
to conduct these investigations in confi­
dence, including local school boards.
Worker privacy. The law relating to the cer­
tified nursing facility education initiative was
amended to repeal the previously established
expiration date for the program. Another
amendment provides that the records, re­
ports, and communications of any staff mem­
ber or other person acting on behalf of the
nonprofit organization are privileged com­
munications and may not be disclosed or ob­
tained by legal discovery proceedings unless
a circuit court, after a hearing and showing of
good cause arising from extraordinary circum­
stances, orders the disclosure o f such
records, reports, and communications.
Workplace security. The Department of
Human Resource Management is to develop
a Statewide policy for designating sensitive
positions within each State agency. Such
sensitive positions will include positions
generally described as being directly respon­
sible for the health, safety and welfare of
the general populace, or for protection of
critical infrastructures. Final candidates for
employment in a sensitive position will be
required, as a condition of employment, to

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

27

State Labor Laws, 2003

submit to a criminal background check, sub­
mit to fingerprinting and provide personal
descriptive information, all of which will be
forwarded through the Central Criminal
Records Exchange to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
As a condition of em ployment, any
county having the county manager form of
government must require any applicant who
is offered or accepts employment at the
county’s water treatment facility to submit
to fingerprinting and to provide personal
descriptive information to be forwarded
along w ith the applicant’s fingerprints
through the Central Criminal Records Ex­
change to the Federal Bureau of Investiga­
tion for the purpose of obtaining criminal
history information. Such applicants will, if
required by ordinance, pay the cost of fin­
gerprinting or a criminal records check or
both.
The section of the law relating to com­
mercial driver’s licenses and hazardous ma­
terials endorsem ents was am ended to
meet the requirements of the Federal U.S.A.
Patriot Act of 2001. This act, in part, pro­
hibits issuance by States of commercial
driver’s licenses with hazardous materials en­
dorsements unless the U.S. Secretary of
Transportation certifies that the applicant
poses no security risk.

for Seattle, or a successor index, for the pre­
vious biennium as calculated by the United
States Department of Labor. Adjusted dol­
lar amounts of indebtedness will be rounded
to the nearest $500 increment.
Among provisions relating to the prevail­
ing wage law, all intent and affidavit fees paid
by contractors are now to be dedicated to
the sole purpose of administering the pre­
vailing wage program. The Department of
Labor and Industries is to establish a goal of
conducting surveys for each trade every 3
years; actively promote increased response
rates from all survey recipients in every
county both urban and rural; actively work
with businesses, labor representatives, pub­
lic agencies, and others to ensure the integ­
rity of information used in the development
of prevailing wage rates, and ensure uniform
compliance with the law; maintain a timely
processing of intents and affidavits, with a
target processing time no greater than 7 work­
ing days from receipt of completed forms;
and develop and implement electronic pro­
cessing of intents and affidavits and promote
the efficient and effective use of technology
to improve the services provided by the pre­
vailing wage program. In establishing the
prevailing wage rates, all data collected by
the department may be used only in the
county for which the work was performed.

Washington

Hours. An amendment to the labor law
specifies that rules adopted regarding appro­
priate rest and meal periods as applied to
employees in the construction trades may
be superseded by a collective bargaining
agreement covering such employees if the
terms of the agreement specifically require
rest and meal periods and prescribe require­
ments concerning them.

Wages. The State minimum wage rate is ad­
justed for inflation annually in September
by a calculation using the U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for
Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
(CPI-U) for the previous year. As a result,
the rate for employees older than age 18 in­
creased from $6.90 per hour to $7.01 on
January 1,2003, and to $7.16 on January 1,
2004. Also receiving these rates are 16 and
17-year-olds, the result of an administrative
rule requiring that they earn the same mini­
mum wage as adults; 14 and 15-year-olds
may be paid 85 percent of the adult mini­
mum wage.
The law relating to an employer’s indebt­
edness to a deceased person for unpaid
wages, labor, or services performed was
amended to provide that if the decedent’s
employer is the State of Washington, then
the amount of the indebtedness that can be
paid under the law will not exceed $10,000.
At the beginning of each biennium, the direc­
tor of financial management may, by admin­
istrative policy, adjust the amount of indebt­
edness that can be paid to levels not to ex­
ceed the percentage increase in the consumer
price index for all urban consumers, CPI-U,

28

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Agriculture. The Department of Labor and
Industries and stakeholders representing ag­
ricultural employers and employees were to
report to the House Commerce and Labor
Committee and the Senate Agricultural Com­
mittee by September 1, 2003, and by De­
cember 1, 2003, on the status of the rule
development and implementation process
for cholinesterase medical monitoring of farm
workers who handle cholinesterase-inhibit­
ing pesticides.

West Virginia
Hours. A new section was added to the code
regulating motor carriers of passengers and
property for hire, providing for the regula­
tion of intrastate driving hours and duty
hours of for-hire carriers that transport pas­
sengers. Drivers of for-hire carriers may not

January 2004

drive for more than 10 consecutive hours
without 8 consecutive hours off duty; drive
after the driver has on-duty time of 15 hours
without 8 consecutive hours off duty; or
drive after he or she has been on duty for a
total of 70 consecutive hours within 8 con­
secutive days. On-duty time is defined as all
time from when a driver begins work or is
required to be in readiness to work until the
time he or she is relieved from work and all
responsibility for performing work.
Preference. Among amendments to the
West Virginia Jobs Act, the 6-month resi­
dency requirement was eliminated from
the local labor market resident preference
for work on public improvement projects,
the threshold am ount for construction
p ro ject coverage was increased from
$500,000 to $ 1 million, and law coverage
was extended to include projects let by
counties and municipalities.

Wisconsin
Wages. On January 1, 2003, the threshold
amount for coverage under the State pre­
vailing wage laws for State and municipal
contracts was changed adm inistratively
from $175,000 to $180,000 for contracts in
which more than one trade is involved, and
from $36,000 to $37,000 for contracts in
which a single trade is involved. On Janu­
ary 1, 2004, these amounts were changed
administratively to $186,000 for contracts
in which more than one trade is involved,
and $38,000 for contracts in which a single
trade is involved.
The Wage Payment and Collection law
was amended to exclude from the definition
of an “employee”, for purposes of coverage,
any independent contractor, or a person
employed in a managerial, executive, or com­
missioned sales capacity or in a capacity in
which the person is privy to confidential
matters involving the employer/employee re­
lationship. This law provides the authority
to process wage claims and to collect unpaid
wages due regarding minimum wage pay­
ments, overtime premium pay, prevailing
wages, and child labor penalties.

Wyoming
Family issues. A resolution was adopted
encouraging breastfeeding and commend­
ing employers, both in the public and the
private sector, who make accom m oda­
tions for breastfeeding mothers whenever
feasible.
Equal employment opportunity. The up­
per limit of age 70 was removed from the

ban on age discrimination in the Fair Em­
ployment Practices Act. The prohibition
will now apply to all persons at least 40
years of age.
Revisions were made in the hearing
procedures and remedies available under
th e F air E m ploym ent P ra c tic e s A ct.
Among these, the hearing procedure will
now apply to employment agencies and
labor organizations as well as to employ­
ers and employees. The Department of
Employment is to issue an order within
14 days of the hearing officer’s decision
requiring compliance, and if the employer,
employment agency or labor organization
does not appeal or com ply w ithin 30
days, the departm ent may petition the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

district court for enforcement of the or­
der. Remedies available were specified.
These include: (1) requiring the employer,
employment agency or labor organization
to cease and desist from the discrimina­
tory or unfair practice; (2) requiring re­
medial action which may include hiring,
retaining, reinstating or upgrading of em­
ployees, referring of applications for em­
ployment by a respondent employment
agency, or the restoration to membership
by a respondent labor organization; (3)
requiring the posting of notices and mak­
ing reports as to the manner of compli­
ance; or (4) requiring the employer, em­
ployment agency or labor organization to
pay back pay or front pay.
□

Notes
1 All of the State legislatures met in regular
session in 2003. Delaware, Guam, Massachu­
setts, Missouri, and New Hampshire did not en­
act significant legislation in the fields covered
by this article. Information about Puerto Rico
and the Virgin Islands was not received in time
to be included in the article, which is based on
information received by November 10, 2003.
2 Several tables displaying State labor law
information, including a table on State mini­
mum wage rates and a table on State prevailing
wage laws, are available on the U.S. Depart­
ment of Labor, Employment Standards Admin­
istration Web site at http://www.dol.gov/esa/
programs/whd/state/state.htm
3 Ibid.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

29

Workers’ Compensation, 2003

Changes in workers’ compensation
laws in 2003
New and revised legislation
further defined coverage and services
under the workers' compensation
laws o f various States
Glenn Whittington

n 2003, major legislative reforms occurred in California,
Florida, Montana, Nevada, and West Virginia. Maximum
burial expenses increased from $5,000 to $7,500 in Florida
and Iowa, and from $3,200 to $5,500 in Ohio. In California, the
vocational rehabilitation provisions were repealed and re­
placed with a “supplemental job displacement benefit,” up to
a maximum o f $10,000. A lso, in California, chiropractic and
physical therapy treatments were limited to 24 visits for the
life o f the claim , w hile Florida increased chiropractic treat­
ment from 18 visits to 24 visits, and the number o f w eeks of
treatments from 8 to 12.

I

Workers’ compensation coverage was expanded to include

Arizona
Employers no longer have to file a written
certification with the Industrial Commission.
Also, employers no longer have to notify their
employees annually that they have a drug test­
ing and alcohol impairment testing policy.
A person engaged in the business of pro­
viding professional employer services is sub­
ject to the Workers’ Compensation Act, re­
gardless of whether the person uses the term
professional employer organization, staff
leasing company, registered staff leasing
company, employee leasing company, or any
other name. The professional employer orGlenn W hittington is Chief, Branch of
Planning, Policy and Standards, Office of
Workers’ Compensation Programs, Employee
Standards Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
E-mail: gaw@fenix2.dol-esa.gov

30

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

search and rescue workers in Maine and members o f the State
defense force in N ew M exico. In Maryland and Massachu­
setts, students in work-based learning experiences now are
covered. In West Virginia, the Second Injury Fund was abol­
ished, and the length o f time a person may receive temporary
total disability benefits was reduced from 208 w eeks to 104
weeks. In Montana, the waiting period for temporary total
disability benefits was reduced from 40 hours (or 5 days) to 32
hours (4 days) o f wage loss, and the permanent partial disabil­
ity benefit maximum increased from 350 weeks to 375 weeks.
The follow ing is a State-by-State summary o f changes in
workers’ compensation laws.

ganization and its client are considered the
employer for the purposes of coverage un­
der the Workers’ Compensation Act, and
both are entitled to protection of the Act’s
exclusive remedy provision.
The Special Fund may begin payment
of medical or compensation benefits on a
claim that involves an employer who has
failed to secure w orkers’ compensation
coverage.
The civil penalty for an employer not
obtaining workers’ compensation coverage
increased from $500 to $ 1,000. If the Indus­
trial Commission has assessed a civil pen­
alty against an employer within the previ­
ous 5 years for failure to secure workers’
compensation coverage, an additional civil
penalty, not to exceed $5,000, may be as­
sessed against the employer; for a third or
subsequent failure to secure workers’ com­
pensation coverage, the employer could be
assessed a fine not to exceed $10,000.

January 2004

California
The Disaster Service Workers’Compensation
Program was restored. This program provides
workers’ compensation coverage and benefits
to workers in volunteer disaster services
through the Office of Emergency Services.
The name of the “Uninsured Employers
Fund” was changed to “Uninsured Employ­
ers Benefits Trust Fund”; the “Subsequent
Injuries Fund” was changed to the “Subse­
quent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund.”
The period of time required to reason­
ably conduct utilization review will not be
considered unreasonable delay in the pay­
ment of compensation for purposes of de­
termining “penalty issues.”
The 1-year period from the date of death
for commencing proceedings for workers’
compensation benefits in the case of death
from asbestosis was extended to include
firefighters who die of asbestosis.

The fine for committing workers’ com­
pensation fraud increased from $50,000 to
$150,000.
The vocational rehabilitation provisions
were repealed and replaced with a “supple­
mental job displacement benefit” of up to a
maximum of $10,000 if the injured worker
does not return to work within 60 days from
the injury.
Employees receiving vocational rehabili­
tation services prior to January 1,2004, are
entitled to them until those services are con­
cluded. Vocational rehabilitation services
will not be provided to any employee on or
after January 1, 2004.
On or after January 1,2004, if an injury
causes permanent disability and the injured
employee does not return to work to his or
her usual or customary job for the employer,
the injured employee will be eligible for a
supplemental job displacement benefit in
the form of a nontransferable voucher for
education-related retraining or skill enhance­
ment, or both, at a State approved or accred­
ited school. The amount of the benefit is
determined by the degree of permanent par­
tial disability the worker suffers.
The employer will not be liable for the
supplemental job displacement benefit if,
within 30 days of the end of temporary dis­
ability, the employer offers modified or al­
ternative work, and the employee rejects or
fails to accept the offer.
By July 1, 2004, the Commission of
Health and Safety and Workers’ Compen­
sation is required to conduct a survey and
evaluation of existing medical treatment uti­
lization standards. By October 1, 2004,
the Commission will issue a report of its
findings and recommendations to the Ad­
ministrative Director of the Division of
Workers’ Compensation for purposes of
the adoption of a medical treatment utiliza­
tion schedule.
The Industrial Medical Council was
eliminated; its functions were transferred to
the Division of Workers’ Compensation.
The workers’ compensation provision
was repealed which allowed a collective bar­
gaining agreement between private employ­
ers in the aerospace and timber industries
and a recognized or certified exclusive bar­
gaining representative establishing a dispute
resolution process for workers’ compensa­
tion claims. A new provision established
such a collective bargaining agreement for
any industry, except construction, which is
covered separately.
Dispensers of workers’ compensation
prescription drugs must dispense generic
drugs, unless a brand name has been specifi­
cally prescribed.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The time limit for paying medical bills
was reduced from 60 working days from
date of complete billing to 45 working days.
The penalty for late payment was increased
from 10 percent to 15 percent. All employ­
ers are required to accept electronic billing
by July 1, 2006.
For injuries occurring on or after January
1, 2004, chiropractic treatment and physi­
cal therapy treatments are limited to 24 vis­
its for the life of the claim. However, an
insurer may authorize supplemental treat­
ments in writing.
All employers are required to adopt uti­
lization review systems consistent with the
utilization review schedule. Cases involv­
ing spinal surgery denials will go through an
expedited second-opinion process.
The administrative director of the Divi­
sion of Workers’ Compensation fund now is
required to adopt and revise periodically a
medical fee schedule for various services,
drugs, fees, and goods, as specified, other
than physician services. The rates and fees
established by the medical fee schedule must
be adequate to ensure a reasonable standard
of services and care for injured employees.

Colorado
If a party to a workers’ compensation case
requests an independent medical examina­
tion, the other parties are required to negoti­
ate and select an independent medical exam­
iner no earlier than 14 days after receiving
the request for such examination. If the par­
ties cannot agree on the selection of an inde­
pendent medical examiner, the Division of
W orkers’ Compensation is to provide a
panel of three physicians from which the
parties may select a physician to conduct
the examination. The requesting party is
allowed to strike one physician from the list;
the opposing party then is given the same
opportunity. The remaining physician then
is designated by the Division to conduct the
examination. If either party does not strike
a physician from the list, the Division will
select the independent medical examiner from
the remaining physicians on the list. The
insurance company is required to provide
all medical records to the independent medi­
cal examiner within 14 days prior to the
scheduled examination.
For purposes of workers’ compensation
coverage, the definition of employee ex­
cludes persons who perform services for
more than one employer at a race meet or
horse track.
The rejection for technical errors by the
Division of Workers’ Compensation of any
document, form, or notices that is filed elec­

tronically will not affect the validity of the
notice to the claimant or any other party.
In case of an on-the-job injury or death
caused by a third party not in the same em­
ploy, the claimant is allowed to collect work­
ers’ compensation and to sue the third party
for any economic and noneconomic damages
not covered under workers’ compensation.
When the insurer pays workers’ compensa­
tion benefits to a claimant, the insurer can
recover the amount from the third party, re­
gardless of whether the damages are eco­
nomic or noneconomic, excluding reasonable
attorney fees and costs paid by the injured
employee or his or her dependents in pursu­
ing the action against the third party. The
claimant must notify the insurer, the third
party, and the Division of Workers’ Com­
pensation of any third party claim and must
receive written approval from the liable in­
surance carrier.

Florida
To be eligible for permanent total disability
benefits, an employee must have either a
catastrophic injury or be unable to uninter­
ruptedly engage in at least sedentary em­
ployment. The definition of “catastrophic
injury” was revised to eliminate the Social
Security eligibility standard and to provide
limited inclusion for certain injuries, such as
loss of both hands, both arms, both feet,
both legs, or both eyes, or any two thereof,
or paraplegia or quadriplegia. Permanent
total disability benefits are payable until the
employee reaches age 75; however, if an
employee is injured on or after age 70, ben­
efits are payable for a maximum of 5 years
following the determination of permanent
total disability.
Permanent partial disability benefits
were increased from 50 percent of the em­
ployees’ temporary total disability benefits
to 75 percent, and the duration of benefit
was changed from 3 weeks for each percent
of impairment to a sliding scale based on
the percent of impairment. Supplemental
benefits which were paid only to employ­
ees who had at least a 20-percent impair­
ment and who were unable to earn at least
80 percent of their pre-injury wage were
eliminated.
The cap on chiropractic treatments was
increased from 18 visits to 24 visits, and the
number of weeks of treatments from 8 weeks
to 12 weeks.
The maximum benefit for funeral ex­
penses increased from $5,000 to $7,500;
death benefits for dependents increased from
$100,000 to $150,000.
An “accidental compensable injury”

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

31

Workers’ Compensation Laws, 2003

must be the major contributing cause of any
resulting injury, meaning that the cause must
be more than 50 percent responsible for the
injury, compared with all other causes com­
bined, as demonstrated by medical evidence
only. In cases involving occupational dis­
ease or repetitive exposure, both causation
and sufficient exposure to support causa­
tion must be proven by clear and convincing
evidence.
For mental and nervous injuries, a physi­
cal injury that requires medical treatment
must be the major contributing cause; the
injury must be demonstrated by clear and
convincing evidence.
An employer and employee are limited
to one independent medical examination per
accident, rather than one per medical spe­
cialty; the carrier is required to pay for only
one independent medical examination. If an
injured worker prevails in a medical dispute,
he or she is allowed to recoup the costs of
the independent medical examination. As an
alternative, both parties may agree to the
use of a consensus medical examination that
would be binding on both parties.
Physician fees increased to 110 percent
of Medicare reimbursement schedules, and
surgical procedures to 140 percent.
The Department of Insurance may pro­
vide confidential information to any law en­
forcement agency or administrative agency
for use in the performance of its official du­
ties and responsibilities. The receiving
agency must maintain the confidentiality of
such information.

Hawaii
“Medical care, medical services, or medical
supplies” now includes such care, services,
and supplies rendered by occupational
therapists, certified occupational therapy
assistants and licensed massage therapists.

Iowa
Maximum burial expenses were increased
from $5,000 to $7,500.

Louisiana
The catastrophic injury sunset provision
payment of $30,000 within 1 year of injury
in cases involving anatomical loss of use or
amputation was extended to July 1, 2006.
Regardless of whether a judgment ren­
dered by the workers’ compensation judge
is in favor of the employer or the employee,
if the judge has made a specific finding that
further delay for surgery would, more likely
than not, result in death, permanent disabil­

32

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ity, or irreparable injury to the claimant, any
appeal of the judgment will be entitled to
preference and priority and handled on an
expedited basis. In such cases, the record
will be prepared and filed within 15 days of
the granting of the order of appeal. The
court of appeal will hear the case within 30
days after the filing of the appellee’s brief.
The provision was repealed which al­
lowed a notice filed with the compensation
insurer of such employer to constitute a
claim for disability in an occupational dis­
ease case.
The provision was repealed which al­
lowed for the reduction of workers’ com­
pensation benefits when a claimant was re­
ceiving old-age benefits under the Social Se­
curity Act.
If an employee is treated by any physi­
cian to whom he or she is not specifically
directed by the employer or insurer, that
physician will be regarded as his or her choice
of treating physician. If the employee is
specifically directed to a physician by the
employer or insurer, that physician also may
be deemed the employee’s choice, if the
employee has received written notice of his
or her right to select one treating physician
in any field or specialty, and then chooses to
select the employer’s referral as the treating
specialist.
If a dispute arises concerning the work
of a vocational counselor, the employee may
file a claim asking the Office of Workers’
Compensation to review the quality of ser­
vices being provided. An employee has no
right of action against a vocational counselor
for tort damages related to the performance
of vocational services, unless and until he or
she has exhausted the administrative rem­
edy provided.
Failure to provide payment or to con­
sent to the employee’s request to select a
treating physician or to change physicians
when such consent is required will result in
the assessment of a penalty. The penalty
will be an amount up to the greater of 12
percent of any unpaid compensation or
medical benefits or $50 per calendar day for
each day in which any and all compensation
or medical benefits remain unpaid or such
consent is withheld, together with reason­
able attorney fees for each disputed claim.
However, the $50 per-calendar-day fine may
not exceed a maximum of $2,000 in the ag­
gregate for any claim.
Employers or insurers who at any time
discontinues payment of claims due, when
such discontinuance is found to be arbitrary,
capricious, or without probable cause, will
be subject to payment of a penalty not to
exceed $8,000, and a reasonable attorney fee

January 2004

for the prosecution and collection of such
claims.

Maine
In partial incapacity claims, the authority to
extend the duration of benefit entitlement
beyond 260 weeks in cases involving ex­
treme financial hardship due to inability to
return to gainful employment has been del­
egated by the W orkers’ Com pensation
Board, on a case-by-case basis, to a hearing
officer or a panel of three hearing officers.
As an alternative to obtaining a reinsur­
ance contract providing coverage against
losses arising out of one occurrence, a group
of self-insurers may participate in a group
self-insurance reinsurance account. The law
details requirements for setting up such an
account.
The limitation on including discontinued
fringe or other benefits only to the extent

that such inclusion does not result in a
weekly benefit amount greater than twothirds of the State’s average weekly wage at
the time of injury does not apply if the in­
jury results in the employee’s death.
Self-insuring employers and employer
groups are prohibited from using workers’
compensation trust funds to make contribu­
tions to political candidates or political ac­
tion committees.
The definition of “employee” was ex­
panded to include qualified search and res­
cue workers while performing a search and
rescue activity requested by a State, county,
or local governmental entity.

Maryland
The presumption of a compensable occu­
pational disease under the workers’ com­
pensation law was extended to include Bal­
timore City deputy sheriffs who suffer
from heart disease or hypertension that re­
sult in partial or total disability or death.
Workers’ compensation benefits received
are in addition to any benefits that the indi­
vidual is entitled to receive under their re­
tirement system, except that the workers’
compensation benefits may be adjusted if
the combined benefits exceed the employ­
ees’ weekly salary.
A student placed with an employer in an
unpaid work-based learning experience co­
ordinated by a county board is considered a
covered employee of that employer for
workers’ compensation purposes. If the
county board chooses to secure the work­
ers’ compensation coverage, the participat­
ing employer is to reimburse the county
board in an amount equal to the lesser of the

cost of the premium for workers’ compensa­
tion coverage, or a fee of $250.

Massachusetts
Students participating in a work-based expe­
rience as part of a school-to-work program
who are injured arising out of and in the
course of such participation at or with par­
ticular employers, are considered employees
of such employers for workers’ compensa­
tion purposes.

Mississippi
The event that triggers the obligation of the
Self-Insurer G uaranty A ssociation was
changed from a determination of the insol­
vency of a self-insurer to the default of the
self-insurer. The default of a self-insurer
means a self-insurer that has failed for any
reason to satisfy his or her obligations for
payment of compensation benefits, medical
care, and funeral expenses.
The Workers’ Compensation Commis­
sion will, upon the request of the Self-In­
surer Guaranty Association or of any other
party or without any request on its own
motion, enter an appropriate order finding a
member self-insurer to be in default and will
determine the date of such default.
The Self-Insurer Guaranty Association
may recover from the self-insurer in default
all amounts paid by the association on ac­
count of coverçd claims of employees of the
self-insurer in default and all expenses in­
curred by the association in evaluating, ad­
justing, defending, and settling covered
claims of the employees of the self-insurer
in default.

Missouri
For purposes of providing funds for the ad­
ministration of the workers’ compensation
division, the division’s director will impose
an annual administrative surcharge upon ev­
ery workers’ compensation deductible plan
policyholder. The surcharge will apply to all
workers’ compensation policies with a de­
ductible option that are written or renewed
on or after January 1, 2004.

Montana
The provisions were eliminated which lim­
ited a worker’s permanent total disability
benefits to a maximum of 10 adjustments,
and which limited the adjustment percentage
increase to 3 percent.
Unless an employer elects coverage and
an insurer allows an election, the Workers’


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Compensation Act does not apply to the
employment of a person who is not an em­
ployee or worker in the State.
The length of an exemption from work­
ers’ compensation coverage by an indepen­
dent contractor was reduced from 3 years
to 2 years before a renewal application is
required.
If parties fail to reach a settlement through
the mediation process, a petition to the work­
ers’ compensation court must be filed within
60 days of the mediator’s report.
The Board of Investments shall invest the
money of the industrial accident rehabilita­
tion account, and the investment income must
be deposited in the industrial accident reha­
bilitation account.
The co-pay does not apply if the injured
employee visits a medical service provider
in a managed care organization or preferred
provider organization, as requested by the
insurer.
An employee who suffers an injury or
dies while traveling is not covered unless,
among other things, the employee receives
reim bursem ent from the em ployer for
costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging as a part
of the em ployee’s benefits or employment
agreement. Payment made to an employee
that is not wages but designated as an in­
centive to work at a particular jobsite is
not considered reim bursem ent for the
costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging; thus
the employee would not be covered while
traveling.
The waiting period for temporary total
disability benefits was reduced from 40
hours of wage loss (5 days) to 32 hours (4
days).
A signed claim for workers’ compensa­
tion or occupational disease benefits now
serves as authorization for the disclosure of
information relevant to the claimant’s con­
dition to the workers’ compensation insurer
or to the agent of a workers’ compensation
insurer by the healthcare provider.
A provision was added that an award for
permanent partial disability may not be based
exclusively on complaints of pain. Also, ef­
fective July 1, 2003, the permanent partial
disability benefit maximum increased from
350 weeks to 375 weeks.
The M ontana Heritage Preservation
and Development Commission is to pro­
vide w orkers’ compensation coverage for
its volunteers.
If an em ployer m isrepresents an
employee’s status as an exempt independent
contractor, the department may impose a civil
penalty of $1,000 on the employer, in addi­
tion to any other penalties provided in the
law.

Nebraska
Workers’ compensation coverage is now
provided to volunteer firefighters, volunteer
ambulance drivers, and volunteer emergency
care providers from the instant that such
persons begin to respond to a call to active
duty until their return to the location from
which they were initially called to active
duty or until they engage in any activity
beyond the scope of the performance of
their duties, whichever occurs first.
For workers’ compensation purposes, an
employer of any number of related employ­
ees and less than six unrelated employees
engaged in agricultural pursuits are not ex­
empt from the Workers Compensation Act.
An employer who is exempt may elect to
bring his or her employees under the Act.

Nevada
A person convicted of knowingly failing to
comply with an order issued by the adminis­
trator of the Division of Industrial Insurance
Relations to cease immediately all business
operations will be guilty of a misdemeanor.
A periodic cost-of-living increase was es­
tablished for injured workers who become
permanently totally disabled. For any in­
jury or disability occurring on or after Janu­
ary 1, 2004, the cost-of-living increase will
be 2.3 percent.
For workers’ compensation coverage pur­
poses, the term “employee” excludes per­
sons who perform services as a sports offi­
cial for a nominal fee at an amateur, intercol­
legiate, or interscholastic sporting event and
is sponsored by a public agency, public en­
tity, or private nonprofit organization.
Sports official includes an umpire, referee,
judge, scorekeeper, timekeeper, or other per­
son who is a neutral participant in a sporting
event.
A self-insured employer, an association
of self-insured public or private employers,
or a private carrier cannot enter into a con­
tract with an organization for managed care
unless the organization’s proposed plan for
providing medical and healthcare services
provides all medical and healthcare services
that may be required for industrial injuries
and occupational diseases in a manner that
ensures the availability and accessibility of
adequate treatment to injured employees.
If a person wishes to contest a decision of
the administrator of the Division of Indus­
trial Insurance Relations to impose an ad­
ministrative fine, he or she must file a notice
of appeal with an appeals officer within 30
days after the date on which the notice of the
administrator’s determination was mailed.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

33

Workers’ Compensation Laws, 2003

If an employer offers temporary, lightduty employment to an employee, the em­
ployer must confirm the offer in writing
within 10 days after making the offer. The
making, acceptance, or rejection of an offer
of temporary light-duty employment does
not affect the,eligibility of the employee to
receive vocational rehabilitation services, in­
cluding compensation, and does not exempt
the employer from complying with the regu­
lations adopted by the division governing
vocational rehabilitation services.
“Medical facility” is a hospital, clinic, or
other facility that provides treatment to an
employee who is injured by an accident or
contacts an occupational disease, arising out
of and in the course of his employment.
A physician or chiropractor who has a
duty to file a claim for compensation may
delegate this duty to a medical facility. If this
duty is delegated, the delegation must be in
writing and signed by the physician or chiro­
practor and an authorized representative of
the medical facility.
The definition of “accident benefits” was
expanded to include preventative treatment
for hepatitis administered as a precaution to
certain local police officers. A “police of­
ficer” is a sheriff, deputy sheriff, officer of a
metropolitan police department, or city po­
lice officer. The hepatitis is presumed to have
arisen out of and in the course of employ­
ment if the employee has been continuously
employed for 5 years or more as a police
officer.
An injury sustained by a member of the
Nevada legislature is deemed to have arisen
out of and in the course of his or her employ­
ment as a legislator if, at the time of the in­
jury, he or she was performing any act or
engaging in any event that was reasonably
related to the legislative office or public ser­
vice as a legislator. It does not matter whether
or not the legislator was receiving remunera­
tion from the State while performing the act
or engaging in the event at the time of the
injury. An injury sustained while campaign­
ing for any legislative or other elective office
is not covered.
Any injury sustained by an employee
of a school district while engaging in an
athletic or social event shall be deemed to
have arisen out of and in the course of
employment, whether or not the employee
received remuneration for participation in
the event.

New Hampshire
For the purposes of determining disability
rates for scheduled permanent impairment
awards, the average weekly wage used will

34

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

be the average weekly wage of the employee
at the time of injury.

New Mexico
The definition of “permanent total disabil­
ity” now includes a brain injury resulting
from a single traumatic work-related injury
that causes, exclusive of the contribution to
the impairment rating arising from any other
impairment to any other body part or any
preexisting impairments of any kind, a per­
manent impairment of 30 percent or more as
determined by the current American Medi­
cal Association Guide to the Evaluation of
Permanent Impairment.
Attorney fees were increased from $ 1,000
to $3,000 for discovery related to workers’
compensation cases. The attorney fee cap
for workers’ compensation cases was raised
from $12,500 to $16,500, and a provision
adopted for an automatic increase (or de­
crease) based on the changes in the consumer
price index for the immediately preceding
calendar year.
An uninsured employers’ fund was cre­
ated in the State treasury and is to be admin­
istered by the workers’ compensation admin­
istration as a separate account. For fiscal
year 2004, $500,000 was appropriated from
the workers’ compensation administration
fund to provide for claims against uninsured
employers. Thereafter, the fund will be fi­
nanced by an assessm ent on each New
Mexico employer of insurance carrier, paid
quarterly.
An executive employee of a limited liabil­
ity company may elect not to accept the pro­
visions of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Compensation benefits are to be paid no
later than 14 days after the worker has missed
7 days from work, whether or not the days
are consecutive.
Workers’ compensation coverage has been
extended to members of the State defense
force when the members are on State-ordered
militia duty. Militia duty is the performance
of actual military services for the State in
time of need when called by the governor or
adjutant general following mobilization of the
National Guard.
An owner or the principal contractor of a
construction project may establish and ad­
minister a controlled insurance plan, provided
the covered project is a construction project,
a plant expansion, or real property improve­
ments with an aggregate construction value
in excess of $ 150 million within New Mexico,
expended within a 5-year period. Require­
ments for the operation and administration
of such a plan are set forth in the Workers’
Compensation Act.

January 2004

New York
It is unlawful for any employer to refuse to
hire, employ, license, or to discharge from
employment an employee in order to evade
such employer’s legal duty to provide work­
ers’ compensation coverage for such em­
ployee. All employers doing business in the
State shall ensure that their employees
working in the State are insured for workers’
compensation.

North Carolina
It is a rebuttable presumption that the term
“employee” does not include persons per­
forming services in the sale of newspapers or
magazines to ultimate consumers under an
arrangement whereby the persons sell news­
papers or magazines at a fixed price and the
compensation is based on retaining the ex­
cess of the fixed price over the amount at
which the newspapers or magazines are
charged to the person.
Any principal contractor, intermediate
contractor, or subcontractor (irrespective of
whether such contractor regularly employs
three or more employees) who contracts with
an individual in the interstate or intrastate
carrier industry and who operates a truck,
tractor, or truck trailer licensed by a govern­
mental motor vehicle regulatory agency, but
has not secured the payment of compensa­
tion for himself personally and for his em­
ployees and subcontractors (if any) is liable
as an employer for the payment of compen­
sation and other benefits resulting from the
injury or death of the independent contractor
and his employees or subcontractors due to
an accident arising out of and in the course of
the performance of the work covered by the
contract.

North Dakota
The name of the Workers’ Compensation
Bureau was changed to the Workforce Safety
and Insurance Organization.
The term “staffing service” was further
delineated to include professional employer
organizations’ staff leasing companies, em­
ployee leasing organizations, and temporary
staffing companies. The term is broadly con­
strued to encompass entities that offer ser­
vices of a professional employer organiza­
tion, staff leasing company, employee leas­
ing organization, or temporary staffing com­
pany, regardless of the term used.

Ohio
Funeral expenses were increased from an
amount not to exceed $3,200 to an amount
not to exceed $5,500.

“Subrogation interest” includes past,
present, and estimated future payments of
compensation, medical benefits, rehabilita­
tion costs, or death benefits, and any other
costs of expenses paid to, or on behalf of,
the claimant by the statutory subrogee.
“Net amount recovered” is the amount of
any award, settlement, compromise, or re­
covery by a claimant against a third party,
minus the attorney’s fee, costs, or other re­
covery. “Net amount recovered” does not
include punitive dam ages that may be
awarded by a judge or jury.
An employer who, on religious grounds,
conscientiously objects to the acceptance of
public or private death, disability, old age,
retirement, or healthcare benefits is permit­
ted to exempt from coverage under the work­
ers ’ compensation law and payment of pre­
miums and assessments under the law, an
individual who on religious grounds consci­
entiously objects to the acceptance of public
or private death, disability, old age, retire­
ment, or healthcare benefits.
Special confidentiality provisions were
established for records of peer review com­
mittees of the Bureau of Workers’ Compen­
sation responsible for reviewing the profes­
sional qualifications and the performance of
providers conducting medical examinations
or file reviews for the Bureau.
Noncertified healthcare providers are pro­
hibited from charging an employee, employer,
managed care organization, or the Bureau of
Workers’ Compensation any amount for cov­
ered services or supplies that are in excess of
the allowed amount paid (certified healthcare
providers were already so prohibited).

Oregon
The distinction between scheduled and un­
scheduled awards for permanent partial dis­
ability was eliminated. All workers with
permanent disability will now receive an
impairment benefit, which pays all workers
at the same rate, based on the State’s average
weekly wage, per percentage of impairment.
Workers unable to return to regular work also
will receive a work disability benefit based
on the impairment, modified by age, educa­
tion, and adaptability factors and the work­
ers’ earnings at the time of injury. Wagebased work disability benefits will be lim­
ited to a wage range between 50 percent and
133 percent of the State’s average weekly
wage, and these limits will adjust annually.
The administrative law judge assigned a
request for hearing a claim for compensation
involving more than one potentially respon­
sible employer or insurer may specify what
is required of an injured worker to reason­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ably cooperate with the investigation of the
claim.
When a hearing is postponed because of
the need to join one or more potentially re­
sponsible employers or insurers, the as­
signed administrative law judge will resched­
ule the hearing as expeditiously as possible
after all potentially responsible employers
and insurers have been joined in the pro­
ceeding and the medical record has been fully
developed.
Attorney’s fees now will be paid for at
two levels of representation in workers’ com­
pensation cases that previously did not al­
low assessed fees: (1) when an insurer or
self-insured employer unreasonably delays
or unreasonably refuses to pay compensa­
tion, or to accept or deny a claim; and (2) in
cases involving a dispute over medical or
vocational benefits before the Director of the
Department of Consumer and Business Ser­
vices where a claimant prevails. The Direc­
tor is authorized to adopt administrative rules
for determining reasonable attorney’s fees
giving primary consideration to the results
achieved and the time devoted to the case. A
cap of $2,000 has been placed on such fees
absent extraordinary circumstances.
The reporting requirements for workers’
compensation claims by insurers and selfinsured employers have been modified. The
Director of the Department of Consumer and
Business Services is to conduct an evalua­
tion of the requirements for reporting claims
to the department and report the results to
the Workers’ Compensation ManagementLabor Advisory Committee. The Director
also now is required to administer supple­
mental temporary disability benefits in cer­
tain workers’ compensation claims.

Rhode Island
When a workers’ compensation insurance
carrier is obligated to pay workers’ compen­
sation benefits to the employee of an unin­
sured subcontractor, the workers’ compen­
sation insurance carrier shall have a complete
right of indemnification to the extent ben­
efits are paid against either the uninsured
subcontractor, uninsured general contractor,
or uninsured construction manager.

South Dakota
In a death claim in which the employee left a
child or children not in the custody of the
surviving spouse, half of the benefits will be
paid to the surviving spouse and the other
half to the surviving child or in equal shares
to the surviving children, until age 18 years.
Payment will be made for life in the case of a

child who is physically or mentally inca­
pable of self-support, or until age 22 years
for a child enrolled as a full-time student in
an accredited educational institution. When
a child is no longer eligible for benefits, his or
her share will be paid to the surviving spouse.

Texas
If a person refuses or fails to comply with an
interlocutory order, final order, or decision
of the Workers’ Compensation Commission,
the Commission may bring suit in Travis
County to enforce the order or decision. If
the Commission brings such suit, it is en­
titled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs
for the prosecution and collection of the
claim, in addition to a judgment enforcing the
order or decision and any other remedy pro­
vided by law.
An employee can purchase a brand name
drug rather than a generic pharmaceutical
medication or over-the-counter alternative to
a prescription medication if a healthcare pro­
vider prescribes a generic pharmaceutical
medication or an over-the-counter alterna­
tive to a prescription medication. However,
the employee is responsible for paying the
difference in costs.
The first valid certification of maximum
medical improvement and the first valid as­
signment of impairment rating to an em­
ployee are final if not disputed within 90
days after written notification is provided to
the claimant or the carrier. The first certifi­
cation of maximum medical improvement
and/or impairment rating may be disputed
after the 90-day period if there is compelling
medical evidence establishing a significant
error on the part of the certifying doctor, a
clear misdiagnosis or a previously undiag­
nosed medical condition, or prior improper
or inadequate treatment of the injury that
would render the certification of maximum
medical improvement or impairment rating
invalid.
An insurance carrier is to begin payment
of compensation not later than the 15th day
(previously, 7th day) after the date on which
the carrier receives notice of an injury. An
insurance carrier who fails to make timely
payment does not waive the right to contest
the compensability of the injury, but com­
mits an administrative violation subject to
penalties.

Virginia
The definition of “injury” was expanded to
include any injury, disease, or condition that
(1) arises out of and in the course of employ­
ment of an employee of a hospital, employee

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

35

Workers’ Compensation Laws, 2003

of a healthcare provider, employee of any
State or local health department, member of a
search and rescue organization, salaried or vol­
unteer firefighter, paramedic or emergency
medical technician, member of the State Police
Officers’ Retirement System, member of a lo­
cal police department, sheriff or deputy sher­
iff, or Capitol Police Officer; and (2) results
from the administration of the vaccinia vac­
cine, Cidofivir, or Vaccinia Immune Globulin,
as part of Federal smallpox countermeasures,
or from the transmission of vaccinia in the
course of employment from an employee par­
ticipating in such countermeasures to a co­
employee of the same employer.
The 6-month waiting period from the time
of pre-employment physical examination, for
the presumption as to death or disability from
infectious diseases to become effective is
waived if such persons entitled to invoke such
presumption can demonstrate a documented
exposure during the 6-month period.

Washington
Claims for hearing loss due to occupational
noise exposure must be filed within 2 years
of the date of the worker’s last injurious ex­
posure to occupational noise or within 1 year
of the effective date of the legislation, which­
ever is later. A claim for hearing loss that is
not timely filed can only be allowed for medi­
cal aid benefits.

36

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

West Virginia
The Workers’ Compensation Division, for­
merly within the Bureau of Employment
Programs, has been renamed the Workers’
Compensation Commission and is now an
agency of the State under the direction of an
executive director. Workers’ compensation
cases are to be decided on their merits, and a
rule of “liberal construction” is not to be used
in resolving such cases.
Effective July 17,2003, no more awards
will be paid from the workers’ compensa­
tion fund to an employee who has become
permanently and totally disabled as a result
of a previous injury and a second injury.
If a claimant receives benefits from an
employer-provided plan to which the em­
ployee did not contribute, and that plan does
not provide an offset for permanent total
disability benefits under workers’ compen­
sation, the Workers’ Compensation Commis­
sion will reduce the permanent total disabil­
ity benefits provided under workers’ com­
pensation by an amount sufficient to ensure
that the claimant does not receive monthly
benefits in excess of the amount provided by
the employer’s plan or the permanent total
disability benefit, whichever is greater.
Effective July 17,2003, the rate for tem­
porary total disability was reduced from 70
percent of the State’s average weekly wage
to 66-2/3 percent, and awards for tempo­

January 2004

rary total disability will not be subject to
annual adjustments resulting from changes
in the State’s average weekly wage. The
amount of time a person may receive tem­
porary total disability benefits under an
award for a single injury was reduced from
208 weeks to 104 weeks.
Effective July 17, 2003, the maximum
benefit rate for permanent partial disability
was reduced from 100 percent of the State’s
average weekly wage to 70 percent, and the
annual adjustment for existing claims was
eliminated.
To be eligible to apply for an award for
permanent total disability benefits, a claim­
ant must have been awarded the sum of 50
percent in prior permanent partial disability
awards or have suffered a single occupational
injury or disease which results in a finding
by the Workers’ Compensation Commission
that the claimant has suffered a medical im­
pairment of 50 percent. A claimant will be
considered permanently totally disabled only
if he or she is unable to work in a position
requiring skills or abilities that can be ac­
quired or that are comparable to those of the
pre-injury position. The comparability of
pre-injury income to post-disability income
will not be a factor in determining permanent
total disability. Permanent total disability
benefits will cease at age 70.
The presumptive 5-percent occupational
pneumoconiosis award was eliminated. □

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

Changes in State unemployment
insurance legislation in 2003
Enactments included increase of maximum weekly benefit amounts,
noncharging o f certain benefit costs, and excluding certain
services from the term “employment”; enactments on the Federal side
included a law was extended twice, one new law, and two regulations
that affected the Federal-State unemployment insurance program
Loryn Lancaster
he Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation
(TEUC) program, enacted in March 2002, and scheduled
to expire in December 2002, was extended twice during
2003. The first extension was effective through May (P.L. 1081) and the second, through December (P.L. 108-26). Under this
program, up to 13 w eeks o f benefits are available to eligible
individuals in all States, and up to an additional 13 weeks in
States with high unemploym ent, for a total o f 26 w eeks.
Individuals w ho have am ounts rem aining in their TEUC
accounts at the end o f Decem ber can collect that amount
through March 2004. A ll TEUC benefits and administrative
costs are federally financed.
A lso, a special TEUC program for airline and related workers
was created in April 2003 (P.L. 108-11) and extends through the
end o f December 2003. This program, called t e u c -a , provides
benefits to workers em ployed by domestic air carriers, at a
facility at an airport, or at an upstream producer or supplier for
an air carrier and were separated from employment because of
the terrorist acts o f September 11, a security measure taken in
response to the terrorist acts, or the military conflict in Iraq.
Under t e u c -a , up to 39 weeks o f benefits are available to
eligible individuals in all States, and up to an additional 13
weeks in States with high unemployment. Individuals who
have amounts remaining in their t e u c accounts at the end of
Decem ber can collect that amount through December 2004.

T

A ll TEUC-A benefits and administrative costs are federally
financed.
The Department o f Labor issued a final rule (effective
N ovem ber 10, 20 0 3 ) rem oving the Birth and A doption
Unem ploym ent Compensation regulations. Follow ing its
r e v ie w o f the B irth and A d o p tio n U n e m p lo y m en t
Compensation experiment originally implemented in 2000, the
Department concluded that this regulation was poor policy
and a misapplication o f Federal unemployment compensation
law relating to the able-to-w ork and available-for-w ork
requirements.
The Department o f Labor issued final regulation (effective
M arch 6, 2 0 0 3 ) c la r ify in g e lig ib ilit y stand ard s for
unemployment assistance that is a direct result o f a major
disaster. This legislation defines w hen unem ploym ent is
considered a direct result o f a major disaster for purposes of
determining whether an individual is eligible for benefits under
the R obert T. Stafford D isaster R e lie f and E m ergency
A ssistan ce A ct. The disaster unem ploym ent assistance
program provides up to 26 w eeks o f incom e assistance to
workers left jobless in the wake o f an event that the President
declares a major disaster and w ho are not eligible for regular
unemployment insurance benefits.
Following is a summary o f State unemployment insurance
legislation enacted in 1993.

Arkansas
Loryn Lancaster is an unemployment
insurance program specialist in the Division
of Legislation, Office of Workforce Security,
Employment and Training Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
E-mail: lancaster.loryn@dol.gov


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

A d m in istra tio n . The p ro v isio n s, as
am ended, co ncerning d isclo su re of
information provide that:
• the director may, pursuant to a valid
subpoena issued by a State

prosecuting attorney, the attorney
general of Arkansas, a U.S. Attorney,
a U.S. magistrate judge, or the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, release
information in the possession of the
departm ent to law enforcem ent
officials who seek unemployment

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

37

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

information for the investigation or
p ro s e c u tio n o f a crim e, or to
enforce an order of a court in a
criminal matter;
• th e d ir e c to r m ay r e le a s e
information in the possession of the
departm en t to F ederal public
officials in the performance of their
official duties acting through the U.S.
Attorney’s office, and that the in­
formation will be disclosed under an
Information Exchange Agreement
w ith the U.S. A tto rn ey ’s office
which will ensure the protection of
the
co n fid e n tia lity
of the
inform ation and the cost of
providing the information.
The amended provisions further provide
that, except as provided above concerning a
valid subpoena issued, that the director will:
• move to quash a subpoena; and
• honor a subpoena and subpoenas
dealing with similar subject matter,
only if a court o f com petent
jurisdiction finds that the need to
examine the subpoenaed information
outw eighs the express policy of
maintaining confidentiality in matters
involving individuals and employers
dealing with the department.
Appeals. The appeals provisions were
modified to allow for a reopening of a matter
by any party and not just the party who
filed an appeal by providing that if any
party fails to appear at the initial tribunal
hearing, that party may request that the
matter be reopened by the tribunal.
The appeal rights for a party filing an
adm inistrative appeal to the Board of
Review were changed to reflect that the party
no longer has the right to an appeal because
the decision was not unanimous.
Provisions concerning decisions of the
board of review and judicial review were
modified by:
• increasing to 30 calendar days
(previously, 20 calendar days) from
the date a decision is mailed to the
p a rty ’s last know n address, the
number of days a party has to request
a judicial review of the decision of the
board of review.
• specifying that, if mailed, a petition
for review will be considered filed as
of the date of the postmark on the
envelope.
Coverage. The definition of “employ­
ment” now excludes service performed by a
person committed to a penal institution.

38

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Financing. The director may issue a
redeterm ination concerning transfer of
experience when a business is purchased,
within 1 year of the original determination
if, through his or her own investigation, the
original determination is found to be in error.
Employee leasing companies are pro­
hibited from moving the wages of a client
from one leasing company account to
another leasing company account with a
lower rate.
The period for which a bank or savings
and loan institution must withhold payment
of any deposit subject to a lien by the
E m ploym ent Security D epartm ent in ­
creased from 30 days to 60 days.
The taxable wage base increased from
$9,000 to $9,500 for the calendar year
beginning after December 31, 2002, and
increased from $9,500 to $10,000 for any
calendar year beginning after December 31,
2003.
Monetary entitlement. The maximum week­
ly benefit amount is $345 for benefit years
beginning July 1,2003, through June 30,2005.
Nonmonetary eligibility. A person will be
deemed unemployed with respect to any
week if, in addition to performing no services
and having no wages for that week (or, for
less than full-time work, having wages less
than 140 percent of the weekly benefit
amount), he or she is not on leave approved
by an em ployer under the Family and
Medical Leave Act, as in effect January 1,
2003.
No one will be disqualified from receiving
unem ployment benefits for voluntarily
leaving work, if the individual left his or her
last work because of voluntary participation
in a permanent reduction in the employer’s
work force after the employer announced a
pending reduction in its work force and asked
for volunteers. Such actions initiated by the
em ployer w ill be considered layoffs
regardless of any incentives offered by the
em ployer to induce its em ployees to
volunteer, and any incentives received must
be reported as receipt of other remuneration.
The provision concerning disqualification
for unemployment benefits for receipt of
other remunerations, was amended to provide
that an individual receiving sick pay, if
otherwise eligible, will be paid an amount
equal to the weekly benefit amount less that
part of the sick pay (if any) payable with
respect to a week that is in excess of 40
percent of his or her weekly benefit amount,
rounded to the nearest lower full dollar
amount. However, any sick pay received due
to a permanent separation from employment

January 2004

will not be disqualifying or deductible. The
employer must promptly report the week
or weeks involved in the sick pay period as
well as the corresponding amount of sick
pay with respect to the week or weeks.
O verpaym ents. The d isq u alificatio n
penalty for false statem ent or m isre­
presentation increased from 13 weeks to a
disqualification from the date of filing the
claim until the claimant has 10 weeks of
employment in each of which he or she has
earned wages equal to at least his or her
weekly benefit amount.

Colorado
Financing. The following amounts are
appropriated from the March 13, 2002,
Reed Act distribution:
• $789,828 for u nem ploym ent
insurance program administration,
• $5,634,514 for employment and
training program administration, and
• $7,000,000 for the administration
of public employment offices.

Delaware
M onetary entitlem ent. The maximum
weekly benefit amount increased from $320
to $330, effective for the benefit year
beginning January 1, 2004, without regard
to the balance in the U nem ploym ent
Insurance Trust Fund.
Financing.
Each em ployer’s new em­
ployer rate or basic assessment, whichever
is applicable to such employer, increases by
a supplemental assessm ent rate of 0.2
percent beginning January 1, 2004, and
thereafter, without regard to the balance in
the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.

Georgia
Financing. The suspension of the overall
rate increase is extended through December
31, 2004, unless the Statewide Reserve
Ratio is less than 1 percent, in which case
the Commissioner of Labor will have the
option of imposing an increase in the overall
rate of up to 35 percent, as of the date of
computation, for each employer.
Nonmonetary eligibility. The disqualification
provision relatin g to em ployees of
temporary help firms who fail to contact
the employer for reassignment to employees
of leasing companies and professional
employer organizations has been extended.

Hawaii
Nonmonetary eligibility. An alternative base
period consisting of the four completed
calendar quarters immediately preceding the
first day of an individual’s benefit year is
used if an individual fails to establish a valid
claim using the standard base period and
certain other requirements are satisfied,
effective for benefit years beginning
January 1, 2004.
Employment and wages used to establish
a benefit year cannot thereafter be reused to
establish another benefit year.

Idaho
Financing. The same taxable wage base,
$27,600, in effect for calendar year 2002 will
be in effect for calendar years 2003 and
2004. Tax rates for positive balance
employers range from .2 percent to 1.4
percent for calendar years 2003 and 2004.
Tax rates for negative balance employers
range from 2.6 percent to 5.4 percent for
calendar years 2003 and 2004.

Illinois
A d m inistration. The D epartm ent of
Employment Security must disclose, upon
request, to a State’s attorney of Illinois or a
State attorney’s investigator the current
address or current inform ation of an
employer of a victim of a felony, a witness
to a felony, or a person against whom an
arrest warrant is outstanding.

Indiana
Appeals. The mailing period decreased:
from 20 days to 10 days after mailing of
notice that an individual has to file an appeal
before an administrative law judge from a
monetary determination notice and that an
employer has to file an appeal from the
employer’s benefit liability notice; from 20
days to 10 days after mailing of notice to a
claimant and employer that they have to file
an appeal before an administrative law judge
for cases in which the claimant’s benefit
eligibility or disqualification is disputed; and
from 25 days to 15 days for parties located
in Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico.
Financing. The first $450,000 or less of
skills 2016 training assessments must be
annually deposited in the special em ­
ployment and training services fund for
training and counseling assistance; then the
rem ainder of the assessm ents must be
deposited in the skills 2016 training fund,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

effective July 1, 2003.
The commissioner must allocate up to
$450,000 annually for training and counseling
assistance provided by educational in­
stitutions or counseling provided by the
department of workforce development for
individuals who:
• remain unemployed for at least 4
weeks;
• are not otherwise eligible for training
and counseling assistance under any
other program; and
• are not participating in programs
that duplicate industrial and building
trade apprenticeship programs.
Training or counseling does not excuse the
claimant from complying with able-to-work
and available-for-w ork requirem ents.
Eligibility for training and counseling will not
be determined until after the 4th week of
eligibility for unem ploym ent training
compensation benefits. These funded training
and counseling assistance programs must be
approved by the U.S. Department of Labor’s
Bureau of Apprenticeship Training. The
allocation used to provide training to
participants in both jo in t labor and
management building trades and industrial
apprenticeship programs increased from 40
percent to 50 percent of the money that has
been allocated to the State educational
institution from the skills 2016 training fund.
Certain provisions allocating money in
the skills 2016 fund to other programs have
been deleted. The provision changing skills
2016 training effective date from January 1,
2003, to December 31,2005, was repealed.
The department must prepare an annual
report by April 30 each year of unobligated
money in the skills 2016 fund, and the
incumbent workers training board may
reallocate the unobligated money shown in
the annual report. The requirement that
funds assessed for or deposited in the skills
2016 training fund be directed or transferred
to the unemployment insurance benefit fund
which was conditioned on the fund ratio or
solvency of the unemployment insurance
benefit fund was deleted.
Contribution rates for contributing em­
ployers were established as follows:

Monetary entitlement. The term “wage
credits” was defined as remuneration paid
for em ployment by an em ployer to an
individual and remuneration received as
tips or gratuities. The wage credits not
to exceed $7,900 for calendar quarters
beginning on and after July 1, 2002, will
be effective until June 30, 2003. The
wage credits were limited to $8,216 for
calendar quarters beginning on and after
July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004; to $8,733
for calendar quarters beginning on and
after July 1, 2004, to June 30, 2005; and
to $9,250 for calendar quarters beginning
on and after July 1, 2005.
Nonmonetary eligibility. The mailing
period decreased from 20 days to 10 days
after mailing of notice that an initial or
additional claim for benefits was filed that
an employing unit, including an employer,
has to notify the department of any facts
which may affect eligibility or right to
waiting period credits or benefits.

Kansas
Coverage. The definition of “employ­
m ent” excludes service perform ed by
agricultural workers who are aliens admitted
to the United States to perform labor under
the Im m igration and N atio n ality Act
(commonly called H-2A workers).
Extensions and special programs. Claim­
ants who exhaust regular unemployment
insurance or any other extended benefits
may receive 2 w eeks of shared work
additional benefits during the period from
July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
Employers will not be charged for additional
benefits paid during the period from July 1,
2003, through June 30, 2004.
Nonmonetary eligibility. Social Security
payments and Railroad Retirement benefits
will not be deducted from unemployment
benefits.
An individual may not be disqualified
from receiving unemployment benefits on
the basis that he or she left work voluntarily
without good cause if the individual left
work due to circumstances resulting from
domestic violence, including:

In percent

Most favorable
Positive balance em ployer.... 0.1 to 2.3
Negative balance employer.... 4.1 to 5.4
Least favorable
Positive balance em ployer.... 1.1 to 4.1
Negative balance employer.... 4.4 to 5.6

• a reasonable fear of future domestic
violence at or en route to or from the
individual’s place of employment; or
• a need to relo cate to another
geographic area in order to avoid
future domestic violence; or

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

39

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

• a need to address the physical,
psychological, and legal impacts of
domestic violence; or
• a need to leave employment as a
condition of receiving services or
shelter from an agency that provides
support services or shelter to victims
of domestic violence; or
• a reasonable belief that termination
of employment is necessary to avoid
other situations that may cause
domestic violence and to provide for
the future safety of the individual or
the individual’s family.
An individual may prove the existence
of domestic violence by providing one of
the following:
• a restraining order or other docu­
mentation of equitable relief by a
court of competent jurisdiction; or
• a police record documenting the
abuse; or
• documentation that the abuser has
been convicted of one or more of the
offenses enumerated in articles 34 and
35 o f chapter 21 o f the Kansas
Statutes Annotated, and amendments
thereto, where the victim was a
family or household member; or
• m edical docum entation o f the
abuse; or
• a statement provided by a coun­
selor, social worker, health care
provider, clergy, shelter worker, legal
advocate, domestic violence or sexual
assault advocate, or other professional
who has assisted the individual in
dealing with the effects of abuse on
the individual or the individual’s
family; or
• a sworn statement from the in­
dividual attesting to the abuse.
The nondisclosure o f evidence of
domestic violence experience by an in­
dividual, including the individual’s statement
and corroborating evidence, is required by
the department of human resources, unless
consent for disclosure is given by the
individual.

collection of delinquent unemployment
insurance contributions is limited to 10
percent o f the total dollars collected
(previously, limited to 20 percent of the first
$2,000 collected, 10 percent of the next
$2,000 collected, and 5 percent of any
amount over $4,000 collected).
Financing. The limitation on voluntary
employer contributions to experience rating
accounts has been removed. An employer’s
experience rate will be transferred whenever
an employing unit succeeds to or acquires
the employees of a predecessor employer.
The restriction that supplemental funds for
unemployment insurance administration be
used only for personnel costs associated
with certain functions was eliminated; these
funds can now be used for any costs
associated with the functions.
If the legislature fails to renew the
Incumbent Worker Training Program prior
to calendar year 2008, amounts collected as
a social charge from employers after 2007
that would have been used to fund the
Incumbent Worker Training Program, will
be deposited and applied to each individual
employer’s experience-rating record as a
contribution.
Nonmonetary eligibility. Temporary or
uncertified teachers or instructors, like other
teachers, are not eligible for unemployment
insurance between academic years or terms
based on the instructional, research, or
administrative services they provided during
the year if reasonable assurance exists that
they will perform such services in the next
academic year or term.

Maine
N onm onetary elig ib ility . B eginning
January 1, 2004, an individual who is not
available for full-time work is not dis­
qualified from receiving benefits if the
individual worked:

Louisiana
Administration. Determinations will be
issued to base-period employers regarding
the chargeability of benefits. These de­
terminations are conclusive and binding un­
less an employer files an application for
review within 20 days.
The am ount attorneys for the State
Department of Labor can be paid for the

40

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

• less than full time for a majority of
the weeks during that individual’s
base period and the individual is able
and available for and actively seeking
part-time work for at least the num­
ber of hours in a week comparable to
those customarily worked in parttime employment during that in­
dividual’s base period; or
• full time for a majority of the weeks
during that individual’s base period,
but is able and available for and
actively seeking only part-time work
because of the illness or disability of

an imm ediate family member or
because of limitations necessary for
the safety or p ro tectio n o f the
individual or his or her immediate
family member.
This nondisqualification terminates for
new applications for benefits on September
30, 2005, but continues to apply to
individuals who have remaining entitlement
as of that date.

Maryland
Adm inistration. An U nem ploym ent In­
surance Funding Task Force to study
taxation and charging for purposes of
funding the U nem ploym ent Insurance
Trust Fund was established. The Task
Force was required to report its findings
and recom m endations to the G eneral
A ssem bly on or before D ecem ber 1
2003.

Massachusetts
Appeals. Criteria was established for the
State advisory council to follow when
nominating persons who will be appointed
or reappointed to the board of review. The
criteria require the nominees to the board of
review to be selected from a list submitted
to the governor by the State advisory council,
and also require that the member designated
as chairman to be an attorney.
Financing. A surtax—a uniform secondary
adjustment payment—will be added to every
employer’s contribution rate in an amount
sufficient to ensure that the Federal loans can
be repaid in full before September 30, payable
when the commissioner determines the
U nemployment Com pensation Fund is
insufficient to continue benefit payments or
repay Federal loans; the secondary adj­
ustment payments must be deposited into
the Unemployment Compensation Fund or
the Federal Loan Interest Fund; deduction of
all administrative costs incurred for assessing
this surtax is allowed prior to deposit;
secondary adjustment payments must be
credited to each em ployer’s account for
experience rating purposes; a notice must be
sent within 10 days of determining that a
secondary adjustment payment is due to the
joint committee on commerce and labor of the
amount necessary to collect; the secondary
adjustment payment for positive balance
employers ranges from 0.3 percent to 0.6
percent and for negative balance employers,
from 0.7 percent to 0.9 percent.

The taxable wage base increased from
$10,800 to $14,000, effective January 1,
2004.
A revised experience rate tax table with
seven schedules is provided. The range of
rates for the m ost and least favorable
schedules is as follows:
In percent

Negative percentage
employers:
Most favorable................
Least favorable ...............
Positive percentage
employers:
Most favorable................
Least favorable...............

4.60 to 7.80
9.08 to 15.40

0.80 to 3.90
1.58 to 7.70

For calendar years 2004 through 2007,
tax rates for negative balance employers
range from 6.46 percent to 10.96 percent
and for positive balance employers, from
1.12 percent to 5.48 percent.
The due dates for filing an updated fund
balance report changed from the 15th day of
the months of January, April, and August to
the 15th day of every month.
If an employer or an officer or agent of an
employer knowingly fails or refuses to pay
any c o n trib u tio n , paym ent in lieu of
contribution, or interest charge or attempts
to evade or defeat such payments or who
makes a false statement or misrepresents the
employment status of an individual under
his em ploy to avoid or reduce any
contribution, he or she will be punished by a
fine equal to the total am ount of con­
tributions owed, plus interest, in addition to
a penalty equal to the total amount that the
individual fraudulently collected during the
period such individual was under his employ.
Withdrawals from the contingent fund
are allowed to pay individuals who volun­
tarily p rovide inform ation leading to
establishment of an overpayment or to a
determination of an employer filing false or
fraudulent contribution reports an amount
not to exceed 10 percent of the total penalty
assessed and collected; employers are not to
take adverse action against an informant, and
an employer that does must be liable in a
civil action for contempt or other proceeding
to such em ployee for w ages and em ­
ployment benefits lost as a result of such
action, litigation costs, and attorney fees;
the employee may bring action in the district
or superior court; the departm ent must
provide a toll-free number for reporting
fraudulent acts and promote and advertise
the number to the public.
Monetary entitlement. The total entitlement


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

to benefit weeks will decrease from 30 to 26
tim es the benefit rate when the S tate’s
unemployment rate for the last 12 months is
equal to or below 5.1 percent in each of the
10 metropolitan statistical areas of the State.
N onm onetary eligibility. A tem porary
em ployee of a tem porary help firm is
considered to have voluntarily quit and may
be denied benefits for failure to contact the
temporary help firm for reassignment before
filing for benefits.
Overpayments. Individuals who fraudulently
collect benefits while not in total or partial
unemployment may be disqualified for each
week of erroneous payment; the amount in
question must be reduced by any earnings
disregarded; erroneous payments may be
deducted first from future benefit payment;
each weekly deduction must not exceed 25
percent of the individual’s weekly benefit
rate; notification must be provided to the
individual of the requirem ent to report
earnings; the notification must meet certain
requirem ents; individuals subject to a
deduction have the right to an appeal and
review.
The department may recover erroneously
paid benefits provided that:

unem ploym ent rates in the co r­
responding 3-month period in either
or both of the preceding 2 calendar
years;
• for 50 percent of regular benefits up
to 20 weeks when the average total
unemployment rate equals or exceeds
8 percent as described immediately
above.
Contributing employers’ share of extended
benefits based on the total unemployment rate
trigger is charged to the nonchargeable benefits
account, effective for benefit charges paid for
weeks of unemployment beginning the week
of August 17, 2003, and ending the week of
January 17, 2004.
For reim bursing em ployers, the
contingent fund is charged for the full amount
of extended benefits based on the total
unemployment rate trigger effective for
benefit charges paid for weeks of un­
employment beginning the week of August
17,2003, and ending the week of January 17,
2004.
Financing. Solvency taxes collected and
deposited in the contingent fund can no
longer be used for the unem ploym ent
insurance automation project.

Minnesota

• there is no pending hearing or appeal
from a decision determining that an
individual knowingly and willfully
failed to furnish information;
• no hearing or appeal from a decision
on ineligibility for benefits is pending;
• no request for waiver is pending;
• no request for a redetermination is
pending; and
• from a determ ination o f over­
payment, an opportunity for an in­
terview and all appeal rights have been
exhausted or not taken within the time
allowed by law.

Extensions and special programs. A total
unemployment rate trigger on a temporary
basis effective beginning May 25,2003, and
ending December 27,2003, was established.
Extended benefits are payable beginning
August 17,2003:

A dm inistration. The com m issioner of
economic security was given authority to
prescribe the manner and format in which
each employer must file quarterly wage detail
reports.
Each employer with 50 or more em­
ployees in a quarter must file its quarterly
wage detail report electronically.
The charging of 1.5 percent interest per
month for late payment of fees, assessments,
surcharges, or certain penalties by employers
is permitted.
A personal identification number (PIN) can
be issued to each ap p lican t for un­
employment benefits and presumptions were
established that the applicant is the in­
dividual using a p i n and received any
unemployment benefit payment issued. The
presumption may be rebutted by a pre­
ponderance of evidence to the contrary.
Biweekly filing of continued requests for
unemployment benefits is allowed.

• for 50 percent of regular benefits up
to 13 weeks when the average total
unem ploym ent rate for the m ost
recent 3 months equals or exceeds 6.5
percent and the average State total
unemployment rate equals or exceeds
110 percent of the average State total

Coverage. Services of a member of a limited
liability company, who has less than a 25percent ownership share and is considered an
employee under the common law, is “em­
ployment” (previously, any member of a
limited liability company considered an

Michigan

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

41

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

employee under the common law would be
considered to be performing “employment”).
Financing. The base tax rate for a calendar
year and any additional assessment will be
determined based upon the amount in the
trust fund on March 31 of the prior year as a
percentage of total wages paid in covered
employment and shall range from 0.1 percent
(if the fund is equal to or more than 0.75
percent of total wages) to 0.4 percent (if the
trust fund is less than 0.55 percent).
Effective January 1,2005, a “falling fund
adjustment” of 0.1 percent is allowed if the
amount in the trust fund on March 31 of the
prior year is less than 0.75 percent of total
wages paid in covered employment and is
either 10 percent or more below the amount
in the trust fund on March 31 of the second
prior year or is greater than the amount in
the trust fund on June 30 of the prior year.
An additional assessment of 5 percent to
14 percent is allowed if the amount in the
trust fund on March 31 of the prior year is
less than 0.55 percent of total wages paid in
covered employment.
The period for which paid benefits and
taxable payroll will be used in determining
an employer’s experience rate is reduced
from 60 months to 48 months.
Any assessm ent, fee, or surcharge
imposed under the State’s unemployment
insurance law will be treated the same as,
and considered as, a tax. Such assessments,
fees, or surcharges will be subject to the
same collection procedures that apply to
past due taxes.
Monetary entitlement. The limit on the
weekly benefit amount has been lowered to
the higher of:
• 50 percent of an applicant’s average
weekly wage during the base period,
to a maximum of 66-2/3 percent of
the State’s average weekly wage, or
• 50 percent of an applicant’s average
weekly wage during the high quarter,
to a m axim um of 45 percent
(previously, 50 percent) of the State’s
average weekly wage.
The maximum weekly unemployment
benefit amount based upon the high-quarter
calculation will not be less than $350. This
provision expires September 1, 2006.
The State’s annual maximum weekly
benefit amount will apply to benefit accounts
established on or after the first Sunday in
August and such benefit accounts will be
unaffected by any subsequent August change
to the maximum weekly benefit amount.

42

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Nonmonetary eligibility. Effective for benefit
ments. The Indian tribe and all its tribal units
accounts established August 3, 2003, and
will be jointly and severally liable for any
thereafter, that provision making an individual
and all contributions, payments in lieu of
ineligible to receive unemployment benefits
co ntributions, interest, p enalties, and
because of receipt of severance pay, bonus
surcharges owed. An Indian tribe that elects
pay, vacation pay, sick pay, or other
to make reimbursements must file a surety
disqualifying income that is considered wages
bond. Under certain conditions, the reim­
at the time of payment, applies to all weeks of
bursem ent electio n and coverage are
payment (rather than only the first 4 weeks of
terminated when a tribe fails to make the re­
payment and one-half the number of any
quired payments or to maintain the required
additional weeks of payment).
surety bond.
An individual who quits employment
because the applicant’s serious illness or
Montana
injury made it medically necessary may be
eligible for benefits if the individual informed
Coverage. The definition of “employment”
the em ployer o f the condition but no
excludes
service performed:
reasonable accom m odation was made
available (previously, required the applicant
• by an individual as an official,
to make “reasonable efforts” to remain in
including a timer, referee, umpire, or
employment).
judge, at an amateur athletic event;
An individual who fails without good
such exclusion does not apply to State
cause to affirmatively request an additional
or local governmental entities, Indian
job assignment within 5 days (previously,
tribes or tribal units, or nonprofit
no time was specified) of completing a
organizations
under section 501(c) (3)
suitable temporary job assignment from a
of the Internal Revenue Code unless
temporary staffing service employer, or who
the service is excluded from em­
refuses without good cause an additional
ployment for purposes of the Federal
suitable job assignment offered, will be
Unemployment Tax Act; or
considered to have quit employment.
• to provide companionship services
The definition of “m isconduct” was
or
respite care for individuals who,
amended to include intentional, negligent, or
because of age or infirmity, are unable
indifferent conduct that “evinces a serious
to care for them selves when the
violation of the standards of behavior the
person providing the service is
employer has the right to reasonably expect
em ployed d irectly by a fam ily
of the em ployee.” Not included in the
member or an individual who is a legal
definition are a single incident that does not
guardian.
have a significant adverse impact on the
employer, conduct an average reasonable
Financing. The department may make
employee would have engaged in under the
changes to an employer’s classification and
circumstances, or good faith errors in judg­
rate of contribution upon an oral request for
ment if judgment was required.
redetermination by the employer, if the
C onduct that was the resu lt o f the
department finds that the department has
applicant, or the applicant’s minor child,
made an error.
being a victim of domestic abuse, is not
The ratios used to calculate unemployment
employment misconduct.
insurance contribution rates have been revised
Evidence of domestic abuse may be
resulting in the following rates:
provided through a statement by an attorney
who assisted an individual in dealing with
In percent
the domestic abuse.
Eligible employers
Limits now apply to the the disquali­
Most favorable..................... 0.00 to 1.67
fication from receiving benefits due to refusal
Least favorable................... 1.67 to 3.47
Deficit employers
of an offer of suitable employment to offers
Most favorable..................... 3.17 to 6.37
made during the claimant’s benefit year.
Least favorable....................

4.97 to 6.37

Missouri
Coverage. The definition of “employer” and
“employment” includes service performed
for an Indian tribe that results in un­
employment insurance coverage of such
service. An Indian tribe may either pay
contributions or elect to make reimburse­

January 2004

Monetary entitlement. The maximum num­
ber of benefit weeks to which an individual
is eligible increased from 26 to 28. To qualify
for the 28-week duration, an individual’s
ratio of total base-period earnings to the
highest quarter base-period earnings must
be at least 3.50.

The percentage for calculating the maxi­
mum weekly benefit amount increases from
63 percent to 66.5 percent of the average
weekly wage.
The minimum weekly benefit amount
increases from $70 to $73 and the maximum
weekly benefit amount from $297 to $306,
effective July 7,2003.
Nonmonetary eligibility. The provision that
allows an individual, who leaves work or is
discharged because of circumstances resulting
from domestic violence, to receive un­
employment benefits is now permanent
because the July 1,2003, termination date has
been repealed.

Nebraska
Coverage. The commissioner must im­
mediately notify the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service and the U.S. Department of Labor if
an Indian tribe fails to make required
payments, including assessments of interest
and penalty, within 90 days after a final
notice of delinquency.
The d efin itio n of “ em ploym ent”
excludes service performed:
• in the em ploy of the State of
N ebraska or any of its political
subdivisions or instrumentalities if
such service is perform ed by an
individual in the exercise of his or her
duties as an election official or election
worker if the amount of remuneration
received by the individual during the
calendar year for services as an
election official or election worker is
less than $1,000;
• at a penal or custodial institution
by a person committed to a penal or
custodial institution.
Financing. An amount of $6,800,484 was
appropriated from funds made available to
the State in Federal fiscal year 2002 under
section 903(d) of the Federal Social Security
Act for administration of the Employment
Security Law and public em ploym ent
offices.

Nevada
Overpayments. The period for recovery of
overpayments is extended from 3 years to 5
years.

New Hampshire
Administration. Delivery of a written notice
for collection of State contributions by an
authorized representative of the commis­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

sioner must be deemed proper service of
process.
The interstate collections provision
allows the courts to entertain actions in the
name of the commissioner to collect benefits
for which liability has accrued under the
employment security law of any other State
or the Federal Government; and gives
authority to the commissioner to collect any
debts of benefits, contributions, or interest
by civil action in any manner provided for
the collection of contributions in the State’s
unemployment compensation law for debt
collection.
The Reed Act distribution, transferred to
the State on March 13, 2002, can only be
used for the payment of benefits and for the
paym ent of expenses incurred for the
adm inistration of the unem ploym ent
compensation law and public employment
offices. The expenses for administration
must be appropriated by the legislature and
only if the expenses are incurred and the
money is requisitioned after enactment of
appropriation law which specifies the
purpose for and use of the money. The
obligation of the Reed Act distribution
(except the special Reed Act distribution) is
restricted within 2 years after the date of the
enactment of appropriation law, and the
amount which may be obligated is limited.
Appeals. The appeal provisions require
that decisions from appeals be sent in
whichever manner the commissioner de­
termines to be most appropriate, including
by first-class mail.
Coverage. The definition of “employer”
includes service performed for an Indian
tribe, resulting in unemployment insurance
coverage of such services; and excludes
coverage of certain services. An Indian tribe
is considered as any subdivision, subsidiary,
or business enterprise wholly owned by an
Indian tribe. An Indian tribe is allowed to
either pay contributions or elect to make
reimbursements. Reimbursing tribe or tribal
unit may be required to execute and file a
surety bond or deposit money or securities
at the discretion of the com missioner.
Extended benefits not reimbursed by the
Federal Government must be financed in
their entirety by the Indian tribe. Under
certain circumstances, the reimbursement
election and coverage terminate when a tribe
fails to m ake the required paym ents;
reinstatement is provided when failure is
corrected.
The definition of “employment” excludes
services by a direct seller if engaged in the
trade or business of the delivering or dis­

tribution of newspapers or shopping news,
including any services directly related to such
trade or business.
Extensions and special programs (effective
Septem ber 6, 2003). An additional
unemployment benefits program is estab­
lished for individuals who exhaust benefits
under the Temporary Unemployment Com­
pensation Act of 2002 after May 31, 2002,
and meet certain eligibility requirements.
Additional unemployment benefits are
excluded from being used in computing the
future tax rate of a taxpaying employer and
charged to a governm ent or nonprofit
employer subject to reimbursing of benefits.
The additional unemployment benefits
are funded from the March 13, 2002, Reed
A ct d istrib u tio n , and the paym ent of
additional unem ploym ent benefits will
terminate upon exhaustion of such Reed Act
funds.
The weekly amount of additional un­
employment benefits available to an in­
dividual is the same as the weekly benefit
amount of regular benefits.
The maximum amount of additional
unemployment benefits available is 13 times
the individual’s weekly additional un­
employment benefit amount.
Nonmonetary eligibility. Individuals are
in elig ib le for benefits betw een two
successive academic years or terms and
during vacation or holiday recess while
performing services as a nonprofessional or
for an ed ucational in stitu tio n only if
applicable to such services in the employ of
the State or any political subdivision thereof,
to Indian tribes, and to certain nonprofit
organizations, effective June 9,2003.
An individual is disqualified for benefits
for any week during which the individual
resides other than in New Ham pshire,
another State, the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or a con­
tiguous country with which the United
States has an agreement with respect to
unemployment compensation.
The labor dispute provisions provide that
a person unemployed due to a stoppage of
work must have worked in 5 or more weeks
(formerly, consecutive weeks) in employ­
ment as defined in the State’s unemployment
compensation law (except service performed
in the employ of the United States), or wages
earned in a like manner in another State to
requalify for benefits.
Incom e support from any F ederal
reemployment account is considered wages
when an individual is totally or partially
unemployed.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

43

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

Overpayments. The commissioner is allowed
to waive interest, penalties, fees, and legal
costs totaling $50 or less related to overpaid
benefits or contribution adjustments.

New Mexico
Extensions and special programs. Begin­
ning July 1, 2003, an optional total un­
employment rate program is established
which triggers “on” for weeks of extended
benefits when the average seasonal adjusted
total unemployment rate for all States for the
most recent 3-month period equals or exceeds
6.5 percent and the average total un­
employment rate of the State for the most
recent 3-month period equals or exceeds 110
percent of the total unemployment rates for
either or both of the corresponding 3-month
periods in the 2 preceding calendar years. The
total extended benefit amount payable will be
the least of the following three amounts:
• 50 percent of regular benefits;
• 13 times the individual’s average
weekly benefit amount; or
• 39 times the individual’s average
weekly benefit amount reduced by
regular benefits, additional benefits,
and readjustment allowances.
Beginning July 1,2003, a high unemploy­
ment period is established for additional
weeks of extended benefits when the average
seasonally adjusted total unemployment rate
for all States for the most recent 3-month
period equals or exceeds 8.0 percent and the
average total unemployment rate of the State
for the same period equals or exceeds 110
percent of the total unemployment rates for
either or both of the corresponding 3-month
periods in the 2 preceding years. Provides
th at for w eeks beginning in a high
unemployment period the total extended
benefit amount payable will be the least of
the following three amounts:
• 80 percent of regular benefits;
• 2 times the individual’s average
weekly benefit amount; or
• 46 times the individual’s average
weekly benefit amount reduced by
regular benefits, additional benefits
and readjustment allowances.
The contributing employers’ account is
not charged for the share of extended benefits
paid based on the total unemployment rate
trigger; the reimbursing em ployer’s and
government entity’s account are charged the
share of extended benefits paid based on the
total unemployment rate trigger.

44

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Financing. A contributing em ployer’s
account is not charged with benefits paid for
dependent’s allowance, separation due to
domestic abuse, or individual’s enrolled in
approved training or attending school on a
full-time basis.
The reduced rate for the payment of
contributions for new employers with less
than 3 years of experience rating is changed
from 2.7 percent to 2.0 percent, effective
January 1, 2004.
An em ployer who is in business in
another State(s), who is not currently doing
business in New Mexico, and who estab­
lishes an account in New Mexico, may elect
to receive a beginning contribution rate of
2.0 percent or a contribution rate based on
the current contribution rate schedule,
whichever is lower, if certain other con­
ditions are met; rates for subsequent years
will be determined by the condition of the
account for the computation date.
A new tax rate schedule is added for use if
the fund equals at least 3.7 percent of the
total payrolls with rates ranging from 0.03
percent to 5.40 percent. This is the most
favorable schedule.
An amount of $2,592,401 was appro­
priated from Reed Act distribution funds
made available to the State on March 13,
2002, to the unemployment compensation
administration fund for expenditure in fiscal
years 2004 through 2007 to implement the
State’s unemployment insurance law; any
unexpended or unencum bered balance
rem aining at the end of fiscal year 2007
rev e rts to the R eed A ct d istrib u tio n
fund.
Monetary entitlement. The computation of
the weekly benefit amount changed from
l/26th of the high quarter wages to 52.5
percent of the average weekly wage in the
highest base period quarter, effective July
1,2003.
A weekly dependent’s allowance of $15
per dependent up to a maximum of four
dependents is permitted, not to exceed 50
percent of the individual’s weekly benefit
rate, effective January 1, 2004.
The use of an alternative base period is
perm itted consisting o f the last four
completed calendar quarters immediately
preceding the first day of the individual’s
b enefit year for claim ants earning
insufficient wages in the regular base period
(first four quarters of last five completed
quarters) to be eligible for benefits, effective
January 1, 2004.
Nonmonetary eligibility. Individuals able to
work and available and actively seeking part­

January 2004

time work in accordance with the terms, and
conditions, and hours common in the occu­
pation or business in which the individual is
seeking work are eligible to receive benefits
under certain conditions, effective January 1
2004.
No otherwise eligible individual is to be
denied benefits for any week because the
individual is attending school on a full-time
basis with the approval of the job training
division, effective January 1,2004.
Separation from employment due to
domestic abuse evidenced by medical docu­
mentation, legal documentation, or a sworn
statement from the claimant is good cause for
voluntary leaving, and individuals are eligible
to receive benefits, effective July 1,2003; the
term “domestic abuse” was defined.

New York
Extensions and special programs. The selfem ploym ent assistance program was
reauthorized permitting eligible individuals to
receive an allowance in lieu of regular
unemployment benefits to assist them in
establishing a business and becoming selfemployed payable in the same amount as
regular unemployment benefits (expires
December 7,2005).
For self-employment assistant parti­
cipants, the requirem ents are w aived
(through December 7,2005) that:
• benefits will be paid to claimants
totally unemployed and unable to
engage in their usual occupation or
occupations for w hich they are
trained or experienced; and
• no benefits will be payable to
claimants who are incapable, not
ready, willing, and able to work in
their usual occupation or occupations
for w hich they are tra in e d or
experienced.
Financing. The subsidiary rate for
employers who have not been liable for contri­
butions during at least the five completed
calendar quarters ending on the computation
date will be the highest percentage for those
employers with a positive employer’s account
percentage.
Negative balance employers are eligible
for a rate reduction if they have a minimum
of 17 quarters of liability (previously, there
was no minimum liability period).
Monetary entitlement. Any claimant whose
high calendar quarter remuneration during the
base period is more than $3,575 will have a
weekly benefit rate no less than $143.

North Carolina

North Dakota

F in ancing. No em ployer granted
reimbursement will be allowed a refund of
any previous balance used in a transfer to
reimbursement status.

Administration. The legislative council will
consider studying the impact of pending
Federal legislation that would significantly
change the respective F ederal-S tate
responsibilities and funding for workforce
development, workforce training, public
labor exchange, and unemployment insurance
programs.
The Legislative Council is directed to
study the State’s unemployment compen­
sation system, including reserve guidelines
for the unemployment trust fund, the system
for rate setting, treatment of positive balance
and negative balance employers, and the
feasibility and desirability of creating an
unemployment compensation board and to
report its findings and recommendations,
together with any legislation required to
implement the recommendations, to the 59th
Legislative Assembly.
Em ployers refusing to comply with
recordkeeping requirements are subject to a
civil penalty of $500 for each offense. The
agency must collect the penalty by civil
action and deposit any penalty collected to
the credit of the Federal advance interest
repayment fund.

Nonmonetary eligibility. An individual will
not be disqualified from receiving benefits
for leaving work due to the disability or
health condition of a minor child or aged or
disabled parent of an individual, or a disabled
member of the individual’s immediate family
if the individual gave the employer notice of
the condition (previously, had to be a
d isab ility or health condition of the
employee).
An individual will not be disqualified
from eligibility for unemployment insurance
solely on the basis that the individual is only
available for part-time work. The individual
may be considered able and available for work
if:
• the claimant’s monetary eligibility
is based predominately on wages from
part-time work;
• the claimant is actively seeking and
is w illing to accept w ork under
essentially the same conditions as
existed while the claimant’s reported
wages were accrued;
• the claim ant imposes no other
restriction and is in a labor market in
which a reasonable demand exists for
part-time services.
A ny c la im a n t le a v in g w ork to
accompany his or her spouse to a new
place of residence because the spouse has
b een re a ssig n e d from one m ilita ry
assignment to another shall be deemed to
have good cause for leaving work.
The disqualification from receiving
benefits is reduced from 5 weeks to 2 weeks
for a claimant who leaves work to accom­
pany his or her spouse to a new place of
residence where the spouse has secured work
in a location that is too far removed for the
claimant reasonably to continue his or her
work.
New provisions expanded the category
o f claim ants covered by the exception
providing good cause for leaving work if a
claimant leaves work or is discharged as a
result of domestic violence. Previously, the
exception applied only to those claimants
given a protective order concerning domestic
violence.The expansion also covers situa­
tions where there is “evidence” of domestic
violence, sexual offense, or stalking, or the
claimant has qualified for the State’s new
address confidentiality program.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Extensions and special programs. The
shared work unemployment compensation
program was repealed.
Financing. The assignment of unemploy­
ment insurance tax rates for employers who
fail to file required reports or filed insufficient
reports has been changed as follow s.
Requires assigning the:
negative employer minimum rate to—
• experience-rated positive employers
• new p o sitiv e nonconstruction
employers

The 1 .5 -p e rc en t a d d itio n a l tax is
eliminated for employers in highway and
stre e t c o n s tru c tio n , e x c e p t e le v a te d
highways, when they fail to file reports
in a timely manner, thus requiring them to
pay the same penalty rate as all other
employers.
Monetary entitlement. The 10 times the
weekly benefit amount limitation on baseperiod wages used to establish a second
benefit year and earned from employment
by a partnership, corporation, or limited
liability company, does not apply if at the
time of filing a claim, the ownership interest
has been ceded.
Nonmonetary eligibility. The definition of
“wages” excludes qualifying supplemental
unemployment payments financed and paid
by employers to former employees if the
payments are paid under a plan meeting
certain requirements.

Ohio
Financing. Amounts totaling $5 3.7 million
for fiscal year 2004 and $47.3 million for
fiscal year 2005 have been appropriated from
Reed Act funds for administration of the
unemployment insurance program, employ­
ment services, and other allowable ex­
penditures.This appropriation will increase,
upon request of the director of Job and
Family Services, for fiscal year 2004 by the
amount remaining unspent from fiscal year
2003, and, for fiscal year 2005, by the
amount remaining unspent from fiscal year
2004.

Oklahoma

negative employer maximum rate to—
• experience-rated negative employers
• new positive construction employers
• new negative employers
With respect to noncharging for voluntary
quits and discharge for misconduct, the quit
or discharge must be during the base period
and the employer must be the base-period
employer.
An employer’s account is not charged
with benefits paid to an individual who is
currently employed part time with that
em ployer w hen the h irin g agreem ent
between the individual and the employer has
not changed since the individual commenced
work for that employer. This provision does
not apply to an employee of a temporary
help firm.

Administration. Unemployment insurance
claims can be filed by telephone or Internet
without a claimant having to first appear in
person at the E m ploym ent Security
Commission office.
Unemployment insurance information
can be disclosed to the Bureau of the Census
of the U.S. Department of Commerce for the
purpose of economic and statistical research.
Subpoenas to com pel disclosure of
confidential unem ploym ent insurance
information will not be valid, except for
administrative subpoenas issued by Federal,
State, or local government agencies that have
been granted subpoena power by statute or
ordinance. Confidential unem ployment
insurance information may be nevertheless
obtained by order of a court of record that
authorizes the release of the records in
writing.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

45

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

Appeals. All time periods allowed for
unemployment insurance administrative
appeals may be waived for good cause.
Claims for exemptions and any other
matter relating to a levy for recovery of an
overpayment must be filed with the Appeal
Tribunal of the Oklahoma Employment
Security Commission within 10 days of the
date of service of the levy.

Financing. The maximum perm issible
probationary period has been extended from
45 days to 90 days, for which an employer
may be noncharged for benefits paid to a
former employee who was discharged for
unsatisfactory perform ance during the
probationary period.
The provision for noncharging of benefits for
an employee or former employee who establishes
a claim for unemployment benefits using an
alternative base period has been eliminated.
The noncharging of benefits paid to an
employee or former employee who leaves
employment as part of a plan to escape
domestic violence or abuse is permitted.
An amount of $6,219,485 was appro­
priated out of the Reed Act distribution made
available to the State on March 13,2002, for
administration of the Employment Service,
One-Stop Career Center expenses attri­
butable to the Employment Service and
Unemployment Insurance Program, and the
Unemployment Insurance Program. These
funds must be expended between July 1,
2003, and June 30, 2004.
Nonmonetary eligbility. Separating from
employment as part of a plan to escape
domestic violence or abuse constitutes good
cause for voluntarily leaving work.
When an employer hires a worker for a
limited duration specified by the employer,
the worker is considered to have been laid
off due to lack of work at the end of the time
period set by the employer, if the separation
was due only to completion of work or the
expiration of the time period.
When an employer hires a worker for a
limited time specified by the worker, the
worker is considered to have voluntarily quit
work at the end of the time period set by the
worker, if the separation was due only to the
expiration of the time period.

Oregon
Appeals. An administrative law judge may
dismiss a request for a hearing when:
• the request for a hearing is with­

46

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

drawn by the requesting party;
• in response to a request by the
administrative law judge or his or her
designee, the requesting party fails to
provide, in a timely manner, the
information necessary to allow the
matter to be scheduled for a hearing;
• the requesting party fails to appear
at the time of the hearing;
• the issues are resolved by
cancellation or amendment of the
decision that is the subject of the
hearing request;
• the requesting party fails to file the
request for a hearing within the time
allowed by statute or rule and fails to
show good cause for the delay;
• the request for a hearing is filed
prio r to the date of the w ritten
decision or written determination that
is the subject of the request; or
• the request for a hearing is made by
a person who is not entitled to a
hearing or is not the authorized
representative of a party who is
entitled to a hearing.
Such a dismissal by the hearing officer is
final unless the party whose request for a
hearing has been dismissed files, within 20
days of mailing of the dismissal notice, an
application for review. Further provides,
however, that a requesting party whose
request has been dismissed because that
party failed to appear may file a request to
reopen the hearing notwithstanding the 20day time limit.
Coverage. The definition of members of
the same family of corporate officers for
whom the corporation may elect to exclude
from “employment” services is expanded.
Such exclusion does not apply to service
performed for a nonprofit employing unit,
political subdivision or for an Indian tribe.
Extensions and special programs. The
State-financed emergency unemployment
benefits have been extended for up to 13
weeks, for the period from A pril 6 to
December 27, 2003. The director of the
Employment Department is allowed to stop
payments of emergency benefits when total
paym ents w ould exceed $29 m illion.
Employers’ accounts will not be charged (and
reimbursing entities need not reimburse the
State unemployment fund) for benefits paid
under this extension.
The ending date of the State-financed
emergency unemployment benefits program
changed from D ecem ber 27, 2003, to
September 27, 2003.

January 2004

The provision allowing the director of the
Employment Department to stop payments
of emergency benefits when total payments
would exceed $29 million was eliminated.
A totally S tate-financed tem porary
additional benefits program was established.
Temporary additional benefits are payable
to exhaustees of regular benefits after
September 27, 2003, through February 14,
2004, during periods of high unemployment
for weeks not within an extended benefit
period. To trigger “on” a temporary addi­
tional benefits period, the 13-week insured
unemployment rate must equal or exceed 4.0
percent or the 13-week total unemployment
rate must equal or exceed 6.5 percent. An
individual’s benefit year must have expired
after January 5,2002, and he or she must not
be eligible for any other unemployment
benefits to receive temporary additional
benefits. The amount of temporary addi­
tional benefits receivable is equal to the
weekly benefit amount of the individual’s
most recent regular unemployment benefit
claim. The maximum temporary additional
benefits an individual may receive is 25
percent of the individual’s most recent
regular unemployment benefit claim. A
contributing employers’ accounts may not
be charged for benefits paid under this
extension, and reimbursing entities may not
be relieved from paying an amount equal to
the temporary additional benefits paid into
the State unemployment fund.
Between July 3, 2003, and February 14,
2004, an additional benefit period may not
begin or continue and additional benefits are
not payable.
The supplemental benefits eligibility
period is extended for 2 years through June
30,2005, for those eligible dislocated workers
who need to continue or complete pro­
fessional technical training and who meet
certain other requirements.
Financing. A report o f taxes due for
em ploym ent consisting exclusively of
domestic service in a private home, local
college club, or local chapter of a college
fraternity or sorority where in any calendar
quarter, the cash remuneration for such
service is $1,000 or more, may be filed
annually rather than quarterly.
The amount of bond or deposit that a
nonprofit employing unit that elects to
reim burse the U nem ploym ent C om ­
pensation Trust Fund in lieu of paying taxes
must provide to the director of the Em­
ployment Department was changed to 2
percent of the employing unit’s total wages
paid for the four calendar quarters im-

mediately preceding the effective date of the
election (amount was previously determined
according to a statutory schedule with rates
ranging from 0.5 percent to 2.0 percent of
payroll).
Nonmonetary eligibility. Individuals are
disqualified from benefits until remuneration
is received that equals or exceeds four times
the individual’s weekly benefit amount for:
• failure or refusal to take a drug or
alcohol test as required by the
employer’s reasonable written policy;
• refusal to cooperate with or subverts
or attem pts to subvert a drug or
alcohol testing process in any em­
ployment-related test required by the
employer’s reasonable written policy;
• being under the influence of
intoxicants while performing services
for the employer;
• possessing a drug unlawfully or in
violation of the employer’s reason­
able written policy during work;
• testing positive for alcohol or an
unlawful drug in connection with
employment; or
• refusal to enter into or violates the
terms of a last chance agreement with
the employer.
An individual is not disqualified if, on the
date of separation or within 10 days after
the date of separation, he or she is parti­
cipating in a recognized drug or alcohol
rehabilitation program and provides docu­
mentation of participation in the program to
the department. This does not apply to an
individual who has refused to enter into or
has violated the terms of a last chance
agreement with the employer.
It is no defense or excuse against dis­
qualification that the individual’s separation
resulted from alcohol use, marijuana use,
unlawful drug use, alcoholism, or drug
addiction.
Individuals are disqualified from benefits
until remuneration is received that equals or
exceeds four times the individual’s weekly
b en efit am ount when the individual
voluntarily leaves work, fails to apply for
available suitable work when referred by the
employment office or the director, or fails to
accept suitable work when offered:
• because the em ployer has or
introduces a reasonable written drugfree workplace policy that is con­
sistent with State unem ployment
compensation law;
• because the employer requires the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

direct the executive director or other
commission staff about those details.

employee to consent to present or
future drug or alcohol tests under a
reasonable w ritten policy that is
consistent with State unemployment
compensation law;
• to avoid taking a drug or alcohol test
under a reasonable written policy that
is consistent with State unemploy­
ment compensation law; or
• to avoid meeting the requirements
of a last chance agreement.

Appeals. The commission must develop, by
rule, procedures to ensure that an appeal
tribunal makes every effort in a hearing con­
ducted by telephone to obtain all relevant
facts and evidence.

Rhode Island
F inancing. E xcluded from the State
employment security fund are Federal fund
disbursements (that is, Reed Act funds) made
to the State from the Employment Security
Administration Account when calculating the
State’s unemployment insurance taxable
wage base. Such funds may now be deposited
in the State’s Employment Tax Guarantee
Fund.

South Dakota
Nonmonetary eligibility. Good cause for
voluntarily leaving employment includes
leaving to protect oneself from domestic
abuse only if the employee:
• reports the abusive situation to law
enforcement within 48 hours of any
occurrence and cooperates fully in any
subsequent investigation and criminal
charge. Requires the law enforcement
agency to complete and return to the
departm ent upon request, a cer­
tification form indicating whether the
em ployee has com plied with the
requirements.
• has left the abusive situation and
remains separate from the situation;
and
• made reasonable efforts to preserve
the employment before quitting.

Coverage. Effective for claims filed on or
after September 1, 2003, the definition of
“employment” excludes service performed
by a nonresident alien during the period that
the alien is temporarily in the United States
under a H2-A visa (to perform agricultural
service) if the service is not defined as
employment under the Federal Unemploy­
ment Tax Act.
Financing. An employer who elects to
make a voluntary contribution for the recom­
putation of the employer’s experience rate
must make the contribution as prescribed by
rules adopted by the com mission (pre­
viously, required voluntary contributions
were required to be made no later than the
30th day after the date on which the com­
mission mailed the annual notice of the
employer’s experience rate).
The commission may deny the transfer of
an experience tax rate if it determines, based
on credible evidence, that an acquisition was
done primarily to qualify for a reduced
unemployment insurance tax rate by:
• circumventing the experience rating
system; or
• manipulating the experience rating
system by minimizing the impact of
chargebacks to the p redecessor
employer’s tax account.
Among other things, for a transfer of
experience to be approved, the following
must occur:

Any person found to have good cause for
leaving employment due to domestic abuse,
and who returns to the abusive situation, is
ineligible for benefits.

Texas
Administration. The responsibilities of the
Texas W orkforce Commission are now
described. The commission may not:
• direct the day-to-day operations of
the executive directo r or other
commission staff; or
• establish the details for the im­
plementation of commission policies or

• an application for such a transfer
filed not later than the first anni­
versary of the effective date of the
acquisition; and
• the applicants show that: (1) the
acquired part of the organization,
trade, or business is capable of
operating independently and sepa­
rately from the predecessor em ­
ployer; and (2) the wages attributable
to the acquired part of the organi­
zation, trade, or business are solely
attributable to services provided on
behalf of the acquired part of the
organization, trade, or business.
An employer’s account is noncharged for
benefits paid to an employee or former

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

47

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

em ployee whose separation from em ­
ployment results from the employee leaving
the workplace to protect the employee from
family violence or stalking as evidenced by:
• an active or recently issued pro­
tective order documenting family
violence against, or the stalking of, the
employee or the potential for family
violence against, or the stalking of, the
employee;
• a police record documenting family
violence against, or the stalking of, the
employee; and
• a physician’s statement or other
medical documentation of family
violence against the employee.

Nonmonetary eligibility. An individual will
not be disqualified from receiving benefits
because the individual left work to protect
the individual from family violence or
stalking (prohibits evidence regarding an
employee who leaves work for this reason
to be disclosed to any person without the
consent of the employee, except as provided
by law).

Utah
Adm inistration. An interim legislative
committee will study and make recom­
mendations regarding:
• the unemployment tax on selfemployed individuals,
• options to provide limited health
insurance benefits for the unem ­
ployed for up to 6 months,
• whether to provide health insurance
coverage, without cost, to the un­
employed, and
• issues related to unemployment
insurance coverage.

An employer’s account is noncharged for
benefits paid:
• to an individual who leaves work to
attend training approved by the
commission,
• to an employee whose separation
was based on a disaster resulting in a
disaster declaration by the governor,
and
• when separation from that em­
ployer is caused by the employer
being called to activ e m ilitary
service.
The computation of the numerator of the
deficit assessment is changed by subtracting
only the balance of the compensation fund
from its floor, not any other liabilities of the
fund.
The provision dealing with the transfer
to a special administration fund is repealed.
The following provisions were effective
June 20,2003:
• the State agency was authorized to
issue bond obligations to finance the
payment of unemployment benefits
in order to avoid borrowing from the
Federal Unemployment Trust Fund
or to repay principal and interest on
previous advances from the Federal
Unemployment Trust Fund;
• the advance interest trust fund is
abolished, and all money in that fund
is transferred to the new obligation
trust fund for the payment of bond
obligations; and
• an u n em p lo y m e n t o b lig a tio n
assessm ent must be assessed an­
nually on every employer entitled to
experience rating if any bonds are
outstanding, and the proceeds of that
assessment are to be placed in the
obligation trust fund.

48

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Appeals. The limitation that the chair of
the Workforce Appeals Board be a part-time
employee compensated for no more than 40
hours of work in a 2-week period has been
removed.
Coverage. The definition of “employer”
has been modified to mean an individual or
employing unit which employs one or more
individuals for some portion of a day during
a calendar year rather than an employing unit
that pays $ 140 in a calendar quarter and that
is subject to the Federal Unemployment Tax
Act.
Registration, rather than licensing, is
required of professional employer organi­
zations. Registration requirements have been
established. The professional employer or­
ganization is responsible for the payment of
unemployment insurance contributions,
penalties, and interest on wages paid to em­
ployees covered under a professional em­
ployer agreement. Professional employer
agreements must specify that the professional
employer organization has responsibility to
withhold, collect, report, and remit payrollrelated and unemployment taxes for em­
ployees covered by the professional employer
agreement. The professional em ployer
organization must report and pay all required
contributions to the unemployment com­
pensation fund using its State employer
account number and the contribution rate of
the professional employer organization. At
least quarterly, a professional employer

January 2004

organization must have an independent
certified public accountant review the
o rg an iz atio n ’s records and prepare a
statement indicating whether all Federal,
State, and local withholding taxes, un­
employment taxes, fica taxes, workers’
compensation premiums, and employee
benefit plan premiums have been paid.
On the termination of a contract between
a professional employer organization and a
client or the failure by a professional
employer organization to submit reports or
make tax payments as required, the client
will be treated as a new employer without a
previous experience record unless that client
is otherwise eligible for an experience rating.
Unlawful conduct includes the diversion of
funds paid by a client to the professional
employer organization, designated as pay­
ment for payroll or any related payroll taxes
or employee benefits or insurance, to any
other purpose or use other than designated,
except in cases where a client has defaulted
on the professional employer agreement or
otherwise failed to pay the professional
employer organization.
E xtensions and sp ecia l program s. A
temporary additional unemployment com­
pensation benefits program for individuals
who have exhausted their regular benefits
was established, effective until July 1,2004.
The eligibility provisions and department
rules which apply to claims for, or payments
of, regular benefits apply to claims for, and
payments of, additional unem ployment
compensation benefits. An individual is
eligible to receive additional benefits if he or
she:
• has received or exhausted all of the
regular benefits that were available to
the individual;
• has insufficient wages to establish a
new benefit year or has sufficient
wages but does not meet the subse­
quent qualifying provisions;
• has no right to unem ploym ent
benefits or allowances under the
Railroad Unemployment Insurance
Act, and has not received, and is not
seeking, unemployment benefits under
the unemployment compensation law
of any other State, Washington, d .c .,
the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, or
Canada. If the individual is seeking
those benefits and the appropriate
agency finally determines that the in­
dividual is not entitled to benefits under
that law, the individual may be eligible
for additional benefits;
• filed an initial claim for regular

benefits on or after March 15, 2001;
and
• files an initial application for
additional benefits on or after June 1,
2003, and on or before December 27,
2003, and has an effective date no
later than December 21,2003.
For additional benefits, the first payable
week is the week beginning June 1, 2003,
and the last payable week is the week
beginning January 25, 2004. The weekly
additional benefit amount is the same as the
weekly regular benefit amount payable. The
total additional benefit amount payable is
five times the individual’s weekly regular
benefit amount.
An individual is required to exhaust
entitlement to benefits in the following order:
(a) regular benefits;
(b) Temporary Extended Unemploy­
ment Compensation, if available;
(c) extended benefits;
(d) additional benefits; and
(e) Trade Readjustment Allowances.
Trade Readjustment Allowances and addi­
tional benefits cannot be paid for the same
week.
A contributing base employer’s account
will not be charged with any portion of
additional benefits paid to an individual. Re­
imbursable and Federal em ployers and
branches of the military are not liable to pay
for additional benefits.
The additional unem ploym ent com ­
pensation benefits program date for repeal is
July 1,2004.
Overpayments. The provisions relating to
penalties for unemployment insurance fraud
have been moved to the Utah Criminal Code.

• operates under a contract specifying
that the individual is free from control
or direction over the performance of
such services;
• is licensed in the Commonwealth to
perform independent clinical services;
• is compensated solely by way of
fees charged for services rendered by
such individual; and
• has a valid business license issued
by the locality in which such in­
dividual performs such services.
Financing. The due date for the com­
mission to provide covered employers with
a statement of the benefit charges and taxes
for the preceding fiscal year (formerly,
calendar year) has been changed from July 1
to December 31.
Monetary entitlement. An alternative base
period is the four most recent completed
calendar quarters immediately preceding the
first day of the claimant’s benefit year for
claimants earning insufficient wages in the
regular base period to be eligible for benefits.
The minimum weekly benefit amount
decreased from $69 to $59 and the maximum
weekly benefit amount from $368 to $318
beginning January 5, 2003, for claims
effective on or after January 5, 2003, but
before July 6, 2003.
The minimum weekly benefit amount
decreased from $59 to $50 and the maximum
weekly benefit amount from $318 to $316
beginning July 6, 2003, for claims effective
on or after July 6, 2003, but before July 4,
2004.
The $50 minimum weekly benefit amount
remains the same, and the maximum weekly
benefit amount increases from $316 to $326
beginning July 4, 2004, for claims effective
on or after July 4, 2004.

Virginia
Administration. The records and reports
provisions have been modified to permit the
Commission to furnish information to the
Commonwealth’s designated agent for the
purpose of collecting fines, penalties, and
costs owed to the Commonwealth or its
political subdivisions.
A legislative commission was created and
tasked with annually reporting on Virginia’s
unemployment compensation system. The
commission expires July 1,2006.
C overage. The term “em ploym ent”
excludes service performed by a licensed
clinical social worker, licensed psychologist,
licensed professional counselor, or licensed
psychiatrist, if such individual:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Nonmonetary eligibility. The amount de­
ducted from the weekly benefit amount
payable to an individual due to receipt of
Social Security or railroad retirement benefits
has been reduced from 100 percent to 50
percent of such benefits attributable to such
week.

Washington
Administration. Effective January 4,2004,
the Employment Security Department must
contract with employment security agencies
in other States to ensure that individuals
residing in those States and receiving
Washington unemployment benefits are
actively searching for work.

Effective on or after January 1,2007, the
average annual wage for contribution
purposes will be calculated based on wage
inform ation from em ployers from the
preceding calendar year only (formerly, based
on wage information from the preceding 3
calendar years).
The basic penalty for failure o f an
employer to file timely and complete reports
changed from a minimum of $ 10 per violation
to an am ount determ ined by the com ­
m issioner of the Em ploym ent Security
Department, but not to exceed $250 or 10
percent of the quarterly contributions for
each offense, whichever is less.
If an employer knowingly misrepresents
the amount of his or her payroll to the
Em ploym ent Security D epartm ent, the
employer shall be liable for up to 10 times
the amount of the difference in contributions
paid and the amount the employer should
have paid and for the reasonable expenses of
auditing his or her books and collecting such
sums.
If a delinquency is due to an intent to
evade successorship provisions, the com­
missioner will assign to the employer, and to
any business found to be promoting the
evasion of such provisions, a special tax rate
for five consecutive calendar quarters,
beginning with the calendar quarter in which
the intent to evade such provision is found.
The Employment Security Department
is required to:
• in consultation with an advisory
com m ittee equally representing
business and labor, identify the
programs funded by special admini­
strative contributions and report to
the advisory committee the expendi­
tures for these programs annually and
cumulatively since enactment;
• conduct a review of the type, rate,
and causes of employer turnover in
the unem ploym ent com pensation
system, using unified business identi­
fier information or other relevant data
bases and methods;
• conduct a study of the potential for
year to year volatility, if any, in the
rate classes to which employers in the
array system are assigned; and
• report its findings and recom ­
mendations to the legislature by
December 1,2003.
Interest penalties on overpayments must
be used, first, to fund either Social Security
number cross-match audits or other more
effective activities to ensure that individuals
are entitled to all amounts of benefits that

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

49

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

they are paid and second, to fund other
detection and recovery of overpayment and
collection activities.
A savings clause was added providing that
if any part of this Washington Employment
Security Act is found to be in conflict with
Federal requirements, the conflicting part of
the Act will be inoperative to the extent of
the conflict.

• because the individual’s worksite
changed, such change caused a material
increase in distance or difficulty of
travel, and, after the change, the com­
mute was greater than is customary for
workers in the in dividual’s job
classification and labor market;
• because the individual’s worksite
safety deteriorated, the individual
reported such safety deterioration to
the employer, and the employer failed
to correct the hazards within a reason­
able period of time;
• because of illegal activities in the
individual’s worksite, the individual
reported such activities to the em­
ployer, and the employer failed to end
such activities within a reasonable
period of time; or
• because the individual’s usual work
was changed to work that violates the
individual’s religious convictions or
sincere moral beliefs.

Coverage. The definition of “employ­
ment” now excludes service performed by a
nonresident alien agricultural worker for the
period he or she is temporarily present in
the United States as a non-immigrant under
subparagraph (H )(ii) of the Federal
Immigration and Naturalization Act (com­
monly called H-2A workers).
Financing. Effective January 1, 2004, the
definition of “w ages” excludes income
attributable to the transfer of shares of stock
to the employee pursuant to the individual’s
exercise of a stock option granted for any
reason connected with the individual’s
employment.
For rate years 2005 and beyond, the
system for assigning employer contribution
rates was revised. A total of 40 rate classes
have been created. The contribution rate for
each employer will be the sum of an array
calculation factor rate, a graduated social cost
factor rate, and any solvency surcharge.
For contributions assessed for rate years
2005 and beyond, a solvency surcharge will
go into effect when the balance in the
unemployment compensation fund is de­
termined to provide fewer than 6 months of
unemployment benefits. The charge will be
at the lowest rate necessary, to ensure that a
total of 8 months of benefits are available in
the unemployment compensation fund, but
the rate shall not be more than 0.2 percent
for each employer.
Restrictions on voluntary contributions
were revised to account for the change in the
number of rate classes.
For claims with effective dates on or
after January 4, 2004, benefits will be
charged only to an individual’s separating
employer if the individual left work:
• for bona fide employment and
became unemployed after having
worked and earned wages in the bona
fide employment;
• because the individual’s usual
compensation was reduced by 25
percent or more;
• because the individual’s usual hours
were reduced by 25 percent or more;

50

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The definition of “person with marginal
labor force attachment,” the employers of
whom were formerly noncharged for certain
benefits is repealed.
For transfers of employer experience on
or after January 1,2005, if a successor is not
an employer at the time of transfer, the
successor must pay contributions at either:
• the contribution rate of the pre­
decessor employer, for the remainder
of the rate year, after which the rate
will be determ ined based on the
transferred experience of the acquired
business and the successor’s ex­
perience after the transfer, or
• a rate equal to the rate assigned to
employers not qualified to be in the
array, until the successor qualifies for
a different rate in its own right.
If there is substantial continuity of ownership
or management between the predecessor and
successor, the successor will pay at the rate
of the predecessor as described above.
If a successor simultaneously acquires
the business or a portion of the business of
two or more em ployers w ith different
contribution rates, the successor’s rate, until
it qualifies in its own right for a new rate,
will be the rate of the predecessor who had
the largest taxable payroll in the completed
calendar quarter immediately preceding the
transfer, but not less that the rate assigned to
employers not qualified to be in the array.
Amounts in the Federal interest payment
fund must be used solely for the payment of
interest on Title XII, Social Security Act,

January 2004

advances. Funds set aside in an account in
the administrative contingency fund for the
financing of special programs to assist the
unemployed and to finance the Employment
Security Department’s administrative costs
must be expended solely for unemployment
insurance purposes.
Monetary entitlement. With respect to claims
that have an effective date on or after the
first Sunday o f the calendar m onth
immediately following the month in which
the com m issioner finds that the State
unemployment rate is 6.8 percent or less,
benefits will be payable to any eligible
individual during the individual’s benefit year
in a maximum amount equal to the lesser of
26 times the weekly benefit amount or 1/3 of
the individual’s base year wages.
With respect to claims with an effective
date on or after January 4, 2004, and before
January 2, 2005, an individual’s weekly
benefit amount will be an amount equal to
l/25th of the average quarterly wages of the
individual’s total wages during the three
quarters (previously, two quarters) of the
individual’s base year in which such total
wages were highest.
With respect to claims with an effective
date on or after January 2, 2005, an
individual’s weekly benefit amount will be
an amount equal to 1 percent of the total
wages paid in the individual’s base year.
For claims with an effective date on or
after January 4,2004, the maximum benefit
amount changed from 70 percent of the
average weekly wage to the greater of $496
or 63 percent of the average weekly wage.
Nonmonetary eligibility. (Provisions in this
section apply to claims with effective dates
on or after January 4,2004, unless otherwise
indicated.) If, for a claimant actively seeking
work, a labor agreement or dispatch rules
apply, the customary trade practices that
apply to the w ork search w ill be in
accordance with the applicable agreement or
rules.
The provision requiring the commis­
sioner to consider only work-connected
factors in deciding whether an individual has
left work voluntarily without good cause was
eliminated. The special provision concerning
individuals whose marital status or domestic
responsibilities caused them to leave em­
ployment was eliminated.
A claimant must have terminated his or
her employment status and not be entitled
to be reinstated to the same or comparable or
similar provision in order for nondisquali­
fication due to separation as a result of illness
or disability to apply.

The provision exempting those who leave
work to follow a spouse from the voluntary
quit disqualification is limited to those whose
spouse has been relocated due to a military
transfer.
An individual is not disqualified from
receiving benefits for voluntarily leaving
work if:
• the individual’s usual compensation
was reduced by 25 percent or more;
• the individual’s usual hours were
reduced by 25 percent or more;
• the individual’s worksite changed,
such change caused a material increase
in distance or difficulty of travel, and,
after the change, the commute was
greater than is customary for workers
in the individual’s job classification
and labor market;
• the individual’s worksite safety
deteriorated, the individual reported
such safety d eterioration to the
employer, and the employer failed to
correct the hazards within a reasonable
period of time;
• the individual left work because of
illegal activities in the individual’s
worksite, the individual reported such
activities to the employer, and the
employer failed to end such activities
within a reasonable period of time; or
• the individual’s usual work was
changed to work that violates the
individual’s religious convictions or
sincere moral beliefs.
“Misconduct,” is defined as, but is not
limited to:
• willful or wanton disregard of the
rights, title, and interests of the
employer or a fellow employee;
• deliberate violations or disregard of
standards of behavior which the
employer has the right to expect of an
employee;
• carelessness or negligence that
causes or would likely cause serious
bodily harm to the employer or a
fellow employee; or
• carelessness or negligence of such
degree or recurrence to show an
intentional or substantial disregard of
the employer’s interest.
The follow ing acts are considered
misconduct:
• insubordination showing a deli­
berate, willful, or purposeful refusal
to follow the reasonable directions or


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

only that w age cred its based on that
employment would be canceled.)
If evidence of seeking work consists of
documented in-person activities at the local
reemployment center, the activities must
occur at least three tim es per week to
satisfy the job search requirem ents for
claims of 5 or more weeks.
An individual who fails to comply fully
with the requirements for actively seeking
work will lose benefits for all weeks of
noncompliance and will be liable for the
repayment of such benefits.
W ith respect to claim s that have an
effective date on or after January 2, 2005,
an otherwise eligible individual may not be
denied benefits for any week, due to the
ap p licatio n o f p ro v isio n s rela tin g to
availability for work, active search for work,
or failure to apply for or refusal to accept
suitable work, because the individual is a
part-time worker and is available for, seeks,
applies for, or accepts only work of 17 or
fewer hours per week.
“Part-tim e w orker” is defined as an
individual who earned w ages in “ em ­
ployment” in at least 40 weeks in the in­
dividual’s base year, and did not earn wages
in “employment” in more than 17 hours per
week in any weeks in the individual’s base
year.
Effective upon enactment, the section
providing that employees separated from
employment due to wage garnishment will
not be disqualified is repealed.

instructions of the employer;
• repeated inexcusable tardiness
following warnings by the employer;
• dishonesty related to employment,
including but not limited to deliberate
falsification of company records,
theft, deliberate deception, or lying;
• repeated and inexcusable absences,
including absences for which the
employee was able to give advance
notice and failed to do so;
• deliberate acts that are illegal, pro­
voke violence or violation of laws, or
violate the collective bargaining agree­
ment. However, an employee who
engages in lawful union activity may
not be disqualified due to misconduct;
• violation of a company rule if the
rule is reasonable and if the claimant
knew or should have known of the
existence of the rule; or
• violations of law by the claimant
while acting within the scope of
employment that substantially affect
the claimant’s job performance or that
substantially harm the em ployer’s
ability to do business.
“Misconduct” does not include:
• inefficiency, unsatisfactory con­
duct, or failure to perform well as the
result of inability or incapacity;
• inadvertence or ordinary negligence
in isolated instances; or
• good faith errors in judgment or
discretion.

Wyoming

“Gross m isconduct” is defined as a
criminal act in connection with an individual’s
work for which the individual has been
convicted in a criminal court, or has admitted
committing, or conduct connected with the
individual’s work that demonstrates a flagrant
and wanton disregard of and for the rights,
title, or interest of the employer or a fellow
employee.
An individual will be disqualified from
receiving benefits if he or she has been
discharged for misconduct for 10 (pre­
viously, 7) calendar weeks and until he or
she has obtained bona fide work in covered
employment and has earned wages in that
employment equal to 10 times (previously,
7 times) his or her weekly benefit amount.
An individual who has been discharged
from his or her work because of gross
misconduct will have either all hourly wage
credits based on that employment or 680
hours of wage credits, whichever is greater,
canceled. (The law previously provided

Financing. The threshold for computing
the positive fund balance adjustment factor
has been reduced from 4 percent to 3-Vi
percent of total payrolls (effective July 1,
2003).
The com puted p o sitiv e adjustm ent
factor rem ains effective until the fund
balance equals 3-Vi percent (formerly, 4
percent) or more of total payrolls (effective
July 1, 2003).
The special reserve contribution rate and
its deposit in the clearing account was
eliminated.
The base rate reduction changed from 20
percent to 14 percent, reflecting the eli­
mination of the special reserve contribution
rate.
The adjustment factor for noncharged
and ineffectively charged benefits that must
be allocated to the unemployment com­
pensation fund has been reduced from 80
percent to 60 percent, and that portion of
this adjustment factor that must be allocated

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

51

Unemployment Insurance Laws, 2003

to the employment support fund increased
from 20 percent to 40 percent.
The percentage of total payrolls used to
determine whether the negative fund balance
adjustment factor is applicable has been
reduced from 5 percent to 4 percent.
The percentage of the total payrolls used
to compute the negative adjustment factor has
been reduced from 5 percent to 4 percent.
The computed negative adjustment fac­
tor remains effective until the fund balance
is equal to or less than 4 percent (formerly,
5 percent) of the total payrolls.
The adjustment factors applied to an
employer’s contribution rate must not be
less than zero.
Nonmonetary eligibility. The maximum
weekly benefit amount will be no more
than the statewide average weekly wage
tim es 55 percent (w ithout the form er
limitation of $300).
The period during which the waiting
week for initial or additional claims for
benefits does not apply is extended for 1
additional year (to June 30, 2005).
An otherw ise eligible individual is
eligible for benefits if not receiving wages
or com pensation while participating in
training in an apprenticeship program
approved by the department if the individ­

52

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ual meets certain conditions.
W ith respect to disqualification for
voluntary quit without good cause, failure
to search for work, and refusal of suitable
work, the 12-week rework requirement is
eliminated, and the requalifying earnings are
lowered from 12 times to 8 times the weekly
benefit amount.
W ith respect to disqualification for
misconduct, the 12-week rework require­
ment is eliminated.
An individual is disqualified from benefit
entitlement if receiving a retirement annuity,
pension, or other payments from a base-period
employer or a contributory base-period
em ployer and the individual made no
contribution to the annuity, pension, or other
payment. No deduction from benefits will be
made when an individual receives a retirement
annuity, pension, or other payment that the
individual contributed to (previously, a 50percent deduction was required).
The recoupment period for offsetting
overpayments without civil action against
future benefits changed from within 3 years of
the effective date o f an overpaym ent
determ ination to within 5 years o f the
effective date of the claim resulting in the
overpayment.
The department must cancel the amount
of overpayment or penalty due on any over­

January 2004

payment when the individual is deceased with
no estate or the estate is closed and all assets
are distributed or the individual is adjudicated
insolvent by a court of competent jurisdiction
with no remaining assets.
The department is permitted to cancel
the amount of overpayments or penalty due
on any overpaym ent 5 years after the
effective date of the claim resulting in an
overpayment when:
• the individual cannot be located
within the State of Wyoming;
• the individual is totally unable to
work; or
• the department’s records show the
individual earned covered wages of
less than one-half the average weekly
wage within Wyoming in the most
recent calendar year.
Certain religious, charitable, educational or
other nonprofit employers and employers of
domestic service, or agricultural labor, who met
the State’s unemployment insurance tax
liability requirements for the first time during
the preceding calendar year, are exempt from
the delinquent rate provisions for the
subsequent year, if the employer submits all
reports and contributions by April 30 of the
subsequent year.

New journal from OECD
Feeling that there has been “a lack o f
in te rn a tio n a l jo u r n a ls
d e a lin g
s p e c if ic a lly w ith s ta tis tic a l and
econom ic research on business cycles,”
the O rganization for Econom ic C o­
operation and D evelopm ent recently
launched the Journal o f B usiness Cycle
M easurem ent a n d A nalysis.
T he in tro d u cto ry e s sa y by the
eminent business cycle scholar Victor
Zarnowitz succinctly lays out the need
for and possib le direction o f such a
journal. After noting that the historical
c h r o n o lo g ie s o f b u s in e s s c y c le s
maintained by the National Bureau o f
Econom ic Research extend back over
tw o centuries, Zarnowitz establishes
that these fluctuations “vary greatly in
duration and intensity, less in diffusion,
timing and interaction o f their many
constituent processes.”
T his leads Z arnow itz to ou tline
tw o broad research questions. First,
are cy c le s better understood in terms
o f shocks or im balances. H is ow n
p r e fe r e n c e se e m s to le a n tow ard
im balance stories, but he notes the
rigorous theoretical attractiveness o f
m o d e ls su c h as lin e a r d y n a m ic
equilibrium . Second, is the em pirical
question o f whether or not business
c y c le s are m od eratin g o v er tim e.
W h ile recent history indicates this
m ig h t b e s o , Z a r n o w itz n o te s ,
“ C o n tr a c tio n s ten d to b e m ore
frequent and severe in deflationary
tim es than during tim es o f inflation,
w h ic h h e lp s e x p la in w h y so m e
m oderation o f b usiness cy cles took
p lace in the last half-century.”
Other articles in the issue address
survey expectations, m odeling interest
rates, using qualitative survey data,
detecting cyclical turning points, and
c o m p o s ite in d ic a to r s o f S w is s
manufacturing. The Journal o f B usiness
C ycle M easurem ent a n d A nalysis has
an ambitious editorial mission; but, as
Zarnowitz concludes, “business cycles
are (l)neither dead nor dying, (2) still
com plex, changing, and misinterpreted,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

and (3) deserving much further study,
b etter u n d ersta n d in g , and m ore
effective counterpolicies.”

plans reach retirement age and defined
benefit plans become largely a thing of
the past.

Pensions and retirement

Attitude and altitude

The evolution o f pension plans in the
U n ite d S ta t e s — fro m tr a d itio n a l
defined benefit plans toward defined
contribution plans— has increased the
age at which workers retire, according
to a NBER w orking paper by Leora
Friedberg and Anthony Webb. In the
early post-World War II period, most
pensions were defined benefit plans,
which led to sharp declines in retirement
ages because such plans encourage
workers to retire after a certain point.
Since the 1980s, defined contribution
p lans h ave b eco m e m ore popular.
D efin ed contribution plans tend to
increase the retirement age because the
longer an em ployee works, the more
both worker and em ployer contribute
to the pension fund.
D efined benefit plans use a specific
predetermined formula for calculating
the amount o f an em ployee’s pension
benefit at retirement. They generally are
funded exclusively by the employers.
In d e fin e d c o n tr ib u tio n p la n s,
employers make specified contributions
but the am ount o f the e m p lo y e e ’s
pension benefit is not specified. They
may be funded w holly or partially by
e m p lo y e r s, and e m p lo y e e s o fte n
contribute to these funds as well.
Analyzing data from the longitudinal
Health and Retirem ent Study (HRS),
Friedberg and Webb co n clu d e that
defined contribution plans lead to an
increase in the retirement age o f nearly
2 years, on average, compared with
defined benefit plans. Moreover, the
authors suggest that their findings may
e x p la in the re ce n t in c r e a se in
employment rates among people in their
60s, follo w in g decades o f d eclines.
They expect this trend to continue, as
more workers with defined contribution

Studies o f individuals’ work attitudes
and in d iv id u a l p erfo rm a n ce h a v e
g e n e r a lly sh o w n , at b e st, w ea k
r e la tio n sh ip s b e tw e e n the tw o ,
according to a n ber working paper by
Ann Bartel, Richard Freeman, Casey
Ichnioski, and Morris M. Kleiner. While
that somewhat counterintuitive result
may, according to some research, reflect
m ethodological shortcom ings in the
individual studies, the authors here go
beyond that argument to exam ine the
re la tio n sh ip b e tw e e n attitu de and
performance at the establishment level.
Bartel and her colleagues use a set
o f em ployee attitude survey data from
a major bank to see, first, if there is a
workplace or “group attitude” based
on com m on experiences at different
establishments o f a multisite firm; and,
second, to see if any such worksite
specific attitude has an effect on the
unit’s performance. They find that the
standard deviation o f the distribution
o f actual branch score on the attitude
su rvey is greater than that o f the
distribution that would be expected if
branches were sim ply random draws
from the bank’s em ployees. Based on
this and the results o f a more detailed
a n a ly sis o f v a r ia n c e , B a rtel and
com p any co n clu d e that there is a
workplace effect on how em ployees
view their jobs and employer.
The next question is whether or not
that group attitude has an impact on
group performance. They found that
both net sales and sales growth were
positively correlated with the attitude
scores o f the b an k ’s branches and
em p lo y ee turnover w as n eg a tiv ely
related. In addition, low attitude scores
w ere a s s o c ia te d w ith a h ig h e r
probability o f a branch closing.
□

Monthly Labor Review January 2004 53

Book Reviews
fü

Economics of baseball
M a y th e B e s t Team W in: B a se b a ll
E conom ics a n d P ublic Policy. By
Andrew Zimbalist. Washington, DC,
Brookings Institution Press, 2003,198
pp, $24.95/hardcover.
The 2003 baseball season was an excit­
ing one for many reasons, including the
fierce division rivalries, unprecedented
television ratings, and intense playoff
showdowns. However, despite the ap­
parent health o f baseball, Major League
Baseball (MLB) suffers from several
major problems, many o f which are eco­
nomic in origin. In his book M ay the
B est Team Win: B aseball Econom ics and
P ublic P olicy, Andrew Zimbalist writes
a thorough but concise analysis o f the
econom ic health o f m l b . Zimbalist un­
covers the source o f baseball’s current
problems— m l b ’s monopoly power and
anti-trust exem p tion — and p rovides
reasonable econom ic policy initiatives
to improve the vitality o f the baseball
industry.
Baseball is associated with many
things, but not often is baseball associ­
ated with econom ic theory. Zimbalist
convincingly argues that m l b suffers
from inefficiencies because it is the only
producer o f professional baseball in the
country. In a pure monopoly, there is
only one seller in a market. This seller
uses its market power to artificially re­
duce output to raise prices and profit.
Along with the issue of monopoly power,
Zimbalist addresses the competitive im­
balance o f the game (the Yankees were
in the World Series again), rising ticket
prices, and work stoppages.
A profit-maximizing monopolist al­
w ays seek s to reduce output. This
places upward pressure on prices, m l b
attempted to reduce output in 2001 when

54

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

m l b Commissioner Bud Selig called for
the elimination o f two teams. Zimbalist
describes many reasons why the loss of
two teams would hurt the sport. Most
interestingly, Zim balist discusses the
issue o f talent compression. The distri­
bution o f baseball skills in the entire
population is normally distributed (a bell
curve). Zimbalist says according to the
theory o f talent compression, the larger
the number o f people playing baseball,
the larger the difference in skills between
the best and worst player. Therefore, if
the population increases, but the num­
ber o f teams does not, then baseball tal­
ent is more tightly compressed and the
difference in skills between the best and
worst players becomes smaller. Zimbalist
argues that talent compression is a main
reason why so many baseball records
were established in the early 20th cen­
tury and not broken for many decades.
A s the world’s population grew, talent
became more compressed from 1920 to
1960. Babe Ruth was such a dominant
hitter not necessarily because he had
superior skills, but because he played in
an age when talent was widely dispersed,
so he batted against a larger number of
weak pitchers compared to batters in the
1950s. With the introduction o f two
teams in the early 1990s, talent became
more dispersed again, offering a greater
opportunity o f success for contem po­
rary players like Barry Bonds and Pedro
Martinez. So if m l b reduced output by
elim inating tw o team s, talent would
again become more compressed, making
it more difficult for players to excel.
Because talent compression affects
the performance o f each player, analyz­
ing the performance o f individual play­
ers is a matter o f m icro eco n o m ics.
M icroeconom ics begins with the study
o f people’s behavior and the incentives
that affect their behavior. One o f the

January 2004

strengths o f M ay the B est Team Win is
the way the book uncovers the hidden
disincentives that are hurting the game.
For example, Zimbalist shows how the
revenue-sharing system implemented in
1996 actually increased the competitive
im balance rather than create a more
equally competitive environment. U n­
der the revenue-sharing system , team
owners have incentives to reduce team
payroll, often resulting in lower team
performance. In the downward spiral,
poor performance leads to lower team
revenue. Lower team revenue results in
an increase in revenue sharing transfers
from m l b . Therefore, a profit-maximiz­
ing owner has an incentive to lower team
performance. A s a result, in the wacky
world o f revenue sharing, poor perfor­
mance is often rewarded. In addition,
many owners may use accounting trick­
ery to hide team revenue. Som e team
owners hide team revenue to reduce the
amount o f m oney they have to share
with other owners.
Although there is a significant num­
ber o f problem s fa cin g m l b today,
Zimbalist is optimistic that reform o f the
game is within reach. True to econom ic
theory, Zimbalist proposes that m l b split
into two competing businesses. Elim i­
nating m l b ’s m onopoly power would
benefit consumers by increasing output
(the number o f teams) and decreasing
prices (more affordable ticket prices). If
som e o f the competitive pressures that
brew on the baseball field spill over into
the offices o f m l b , then fans o f the sport
and economists everywhere may truly
say, “May the best team w in.”

— Kevin Skelly
Bureau of Labor Statistics,
New York region

Current Labor Statistics—November

Notes on labor statistics

56

Labor compensation and collective
bargaining data— continued

Comparative indicators
1. Labor market indicators......................................................
2. Annual and quarterly percent changes in
compensation, prices, and productivity.......................
3. Alternative measures of wages and
compensation changes.....................................................

68
69
69

seasonally adjusted.............................................................

12. Employment of workers by industry,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
13. Average weekly hours by industry,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
14. Average hourly earnings by industry,
seasonally adjusted...........................................................
15. Average hourly earnings by industry.................................
16. Average weekly earnings by industry................................
17. Diffusion indexes of employment change,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
18. Establishment size and employment covered under ui,
private ownership, by naics supersector......................

97
98
99
100

Price data

Labor force data
4. Employment status of the population,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
5. Selected employment indicators,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
6. Selected unemployment indicators,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
7. Duration of unemployment,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
8. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
9. Unemployment rates by sex and age,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
10. Unemployment rates by States,
seasonally adjusted..........................................................
11. Employment of workers by States,

28. Employment Cost Index, private nonfarm workers,
by bargaining status, region, and area s iz e ....................
29. Participants in benefit plans, medium and large firm s.....
30. Participants in benefits plans, small firms
and government....................................................................
31. Work stoppages involving 1,000 workers or m o re ...........

70
71
72
72
73
73
74
74
75
78
79
80
81
82
83

19. Annual data establishment, employment, and wages,
covered under Ui and UCFE, by ownership.....................

84

20. Annual data: Establishments, employment,
and wages covered under ui and ucfe, by S ta te ...........
21. Annual data: Employment and average annual pay of

85

ui- and uCFE-covered workers, by largest counties.......

86

22. Annual data: Employment status of the population.......
23. Annual data: Employment levels by industry..................
24. Annual data: Average hours and earnings level,
by industry.....................................................................

90
90
91

Labor compensation and collective
bargaining data

32. Consumer Price Index: U.S. city average, by expenditure
category and commodity and service groups................ 101
33. Consumer Price Index: U.S. city average and
local data, all item s...........................................................104
34. Annual data: Consumer Price Index, all items
and major groups.............................................................. 105
35. Producer Price Indexes by stage of processing................ 106
36. Producer Price Indexes for the net output of major
industry groups................................................................ 107
37. Annual data: Producer Price Indexes
by stage of processing...................................................... 107
38. U.S. export price indexes by Standard International
Trade Classification......................................................... 108
39. U.S. import price indexes by Standard International
Trade Classification......................................................... 109
40. U.S. export price indexes by end-use category................. 110
41. U.S. import price indexes by end-use category..................110
42. U.S. international price indexes for selected
categories of services........................................................ U 0

Productivity data
43. Indexes of productivity, hourly compensation,
and unit costs, data seasonally adjusted........................
44. Annual indexes of multifactor productivity.......................
45. Annual indexes of productivity, hourly compensation,
unit costs, and p rices.......................................................
46. Annual indexes of output per hour for select
industries...........................................................................

111
112
113
H4

International comparisons data
47. Unemployment rates in nine countries,
data seasonally adjusted.................................................. 117
48. Annual data: Employment status of the civilian
working-age population, 10 countries............................ 118
49. Annual indexes of productivity and related measures,
12 countries....................................................................... H 9

Injury and illness data

25. Employment Cost Index, compensation,
by occupation and industry group................................... 92
26. Employment Cost Index, wages and salaries,
by occupation and industry group................................. . 94
27. Employment Cost Index, benefits, private industry....... , 96


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

50. Annual data: Occupational injury and illness
incidence rates.............................................
51. Fatal occupational injuries by event
or exposure......................................................

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

55

Notes on Current Labor Statistics

This section of the Review presents the prin­
cipal statistical series collected and calcu­
lated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
series on labor force; employment; unem­
ployment; labor compensation; consumer,
producer, and international prices; produc­
tivity; international comparisons; and injury
and illness statistics. In the notes that fol­
low, the data in each group of tables are
briefly described; key definitions are given;
notes on the data are set forth; and sources
of additional information are cited.

General notes
The following notes apply to several tables
in this section:
Seasonal adjustm ent. Certain monthly
and quarterly data are adjusted to eliminate
the effect on the data of such factors as cli­
m atic conditions, industry production
schedules, opening and closing of schools,
holiday buying periods, and vacation prac­
tices, which might prevent short-term evalu­
ation of the statistical series. Tables con­
taining data that have been adjusted are iden­
tified as “seasonally adjusted.” (All other
data are not seasonally adjusted.) Seasonal
effects are estimated on the basis of current
and past experiences. When new seasonal
factors are computed each year, revisions
may affect seasonally adjusted data for sev­
eral preceding years.
Seasonally adjusted data appear in tables
1-14, 16-17, 43, and 47. Seasonally ad­
justed labor force data in tables 1 and 4-9
were revised in the March 2003 issue of the
Review. Seasonally adjusted establishment
survey data shown in tables 1, 12-14 and
16-17 were revised in the July 2003Review.
A brief explanation of the seasonal adjust­
ment methodology appears in “Notes on the
data.”
Revisions in the productivity data in
table 49 are usually introduced in the Sep­
tember issue. Seasonally adjusted indexes
and percent changes from month-to-month
and quarter-to-quarter are published for nu­
merous Consumer and Producer Price Index
series. However, seasonally adjusted in­
dexes are not published for the U.S. average
All-Items cpi. Only seasonally adjusted per­
cent changes are available for this series.
A djustm ents for price changes. Some
data— such as the “real” earnings shown in
table 14— are adjusted to eliminate the ef­
fect of changes in price. These adjustments
are made by dividing current-dollar values
by the Consumer Price Index or the appro­
priate component of the index, then multi­
plying by 100. For example, given a current
hourly wage rate of $3 and a current price

56

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

index number of 150, where 1982 = 100, the
hourly rate expressed in 1982 dollars is $2
($3/150 x 100 = $2). The $2 (or any other
resulting values) are described as “real,”
“constant,” or “ 1982” dollars.

Sources of information
Data that supplement the tables in this sec­
tion are published by the Bureau in a variety
of sources. Definitions of each series and
notes on the data are contained in later sec­
tions of these Notes describing each set of
data. For detailed descriptions of each data
series, see b l s Handbook o f Methods, Bul­
letin 2490. Users also may wish to consult
Major Programs o f the Bureau o f Labor Sta­
tistics, Report 919. News releases provide
the latest statistical information published
by the Bureau; the major recurring releases
are published according to the schedule ap­
pearing on the back cover of this issue.
More information about labor force, em­
ployment, and unemployment data and the
household and establishment surveys under­
lying the data are available in the Bureau’s
m onthly publication, Em ploym ent and
Earnings. Historical unadjusted and season­
ally adjusted data from the household sur­
vey are available on the Internet:
http d/w ww.bls.gov/cps/

Historically comparable unadjusted and sea­
sonally adjusted data from the establishment
survey also are available on the Internet:
http ://ww w.bls.gov/ces/

Additional information on labor force data
for areas below the national level are pro­
vided in the BLS annual report, Geographic
Profile o f Employment and Unemployment.
For a comprehensive discussion of the
Employment Cost Index, see Employment
Cost Indexes and Levels, 1975-95, BLS Bul­
letin 2466. The most recent data from the
Employee Benefits Survey appear in the fol­
lowing Bureau of Labor Statistics bulletins:
Employee Benefits in Medium and Large
Firms; Employee Benefits in Small Private
Establishments; and Employee Benefits in
State and Local Governments.
More detailed data on consumer and pro­
ducer prices are published in the monthly
periodicals, The CPI Detailed Report and
Producer Price Indexes. For an overview of
the 1998 revision of the cpi , see the Decem­
ber 1996 issue of the Monthly Labor Re­
view. Additional data on international prices
appear in monthly news releases.
Listings of industries for which produc­
tivity indexes are available may be found on
the Internet:
http d/w ww.bls.gov/lpc/

For additional information on interna­

January 2004

tional comparisons data, see International
Comparisons o f Unemployment, BLS Bulle­
tin 1979.
Detailed data on the occupational injury
and illness series are published in Occupa­
tional Injuries and Illnesses in the United
States, by Industry, a bls annual bulletin.
Finally, the Monthly Labor Review car­
ries analytical articles on annual and longer
term developments in labor force, employ­
ment, and unemployment; employee com­
pensation and collective bargaining; prices;
productivity; international comparisons;
and injury and illness data.

Symbols
n.e.c. = not elsewhere classified,
n.e.s. = not elsewhere specified.
p = preliminary. To increase the time­
liness of some series, preliminary
figures are issued based on repre­
sentative but incomplete returns,
r = revised. Generally, this revision
reflects the availability of later
data, but also may reflect other ad­
justments.

Comparative Indicators
(Tables 1-3)
Comparative indicators tables provide an
overview and comparison of major bls sta­
tistical series. Consequently, although many
of the included series are available monthly,
all measures in these comparative tables are
presented quarterly and annually.
Labor m arket indicators include em­
ployment measures from two major surveys
and information on rates of change in com­
pensation provided by the Employment
Cost Index (ECi) program. The labor force
participation rate, the employment-popu­
lation ratio, and unemployment rates for ma­
jor demographic groups based on the Cur­
rent Population (“household”) Survey are
presented, while measures of employment
and average weekly hours by major indus­
try sector are given using nonfarm payroll
data. The Employment Cost Index (com­
pensation), by major sector and by bargain­
ing status, is chosen from a variety of bls
compensation and wage measures because it
provides a comprehensive measure of em­
ployer costs for hiring labor, not just out­
lays for wages, and it is not affected by em­
ployment shifts among occupations and in­
dustries.
D ata on c h a n g es in co m p en sa tio n ,

prices, and productivity are presented in

table 2. Measures of rates of change of com­
pensation and wages from the Employment
Cost Index program are provided for all ci­
vilian nonfarm workers (excluding Federal
and household workers) and for all private
nonfarm workers. Measures of changes in
consumer prices for all urban consumers;
producer prices by stage of processing; over­
all prices by stage of processing; and overall
export and import price indexes are given.
Measures of productivity (output per hour
of all persons) are provided for major sec­
tors.
A ltern a tiv e m easu res o f w age and
com pensation rates o f change, which re­

flect the overall trend in labor costs, are sum­
marized in table 3. Differences in concepts
and scope, related to the specific purposes
of the series,
contribute to the variation in changes among
the individual measures.

Notes on the data
Definitions of each series and notes on the
data are contained in later sections of these
notes describing each set of data.

Employment and
Unemployment Data
(Tables 1; 4-24)

Household survey data
Description of the series
d a t a in this section are ob­
tained from the Current Population Survey,
a program of personal interviews conducted
monthly by the Bureau of the Census for
the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sample
consists of about 60,000 households selected
to represent the U.S. population 16 years of
age and older. Households are interviewed
on a rotating basis, so that three-fourths of
the sample is the same for any 2 consecutive
months.

E m ploym ent

Definitions

did not work during the survey week, but 12 arima for seasonal adjustment o f the la­
were available for work except for tempo­ bor force data and the effects that it had on
rary illness and had looked for jobs within the data.
the preceding 4 weeks. Persons who did not
At the beginning of each calendar year,
look for work because they were on layoff historical seasonally adjusted data usually
are also counted among the unemployed. are revised, and projected seasonal adjust­
T he u n em ploym ent rate represents the
ment factors are calculated for use during
number unemployed as a percent of the ci­
the January-June period. The historical sea­
vilian labor force.
The civilian labor force consists of all sonally adjusted data usually are revised for
employed or unemployed persons in the only the most recent 5 years. In July, new
civilian noninstitutional population. Persons seasonal adjustment factors, which incorpo­
rate the experience through June, are pro­
n o t in th e la b o r fo r c e are those not
duced for the July-December period, but no
classified as employed or unemployed. This
revisions are made in the historical data.
group includes discouraged workers, defined
F or additional information on na­
as persons who want and are available for a tional household survey data, contact the
job and who have looked for work sometime Division of Labor Force Statistics: (202)
in the past 12 months (or since the end of 691-6378.
their last job if they held one within the past
12 months), but are not currently looking,
Establishment survey data
because they believe there are no jobs
available or there are none for which they
would qualify. The civilian n o n in stitu ­ Description of the series
tional population comprises all persons 16
years of age and older who are not inmates E mployment, hours, and earnings data
of penal or mental institutions, sanitariums, in this section are compiled from payroll
or homes for the aged, infirm, or needy. The records reported monthly on a voluntary ba­
sis to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and its
civilian labor force participation rate is
cooperating State agencies by about 160,000
the p roportio n of the civ ilian n o n in ­
businesses and government agencies, which
stitutional population that is in the labor
represent approximately 400,000 individual
force. The em ploym ent-population ratio
worksites and represent all industries except
is employment as a percent of the civilian agriculture. The active CES sample covers
noninstitutional population.
approximately one-third of all nonfarm pay­
roll workers. Industries are classified in ac­
cordance with the 2002 North American In­
Notes on the data
dustry Classification System. In most in­
From time to time, and especially after a de­ dustries, the sampling probabilities are based
cennial census, adjustments are made in the on the size of the establishment; most large
Current Population Survey figures to correct establishments are therefore in the sample.
for estimating errors during the intercensal (An establishment is not necessarily a firm;
years. These adjustments affect the compara­ it may be a branch plant, for example, or
bility of historical data. A description of these warehouse.) Self-employed persons and
adjustments and their effect on the various data others not on a regular civilian payroll are
series appears in the Explanatory Notes of outside the scope of the survey because they
Employment and Earnings. For a discussion are excluded from establishment records.
of changes introduced in January 2003, see This largely accounts for the difference in
“Revisions to the Current Population Survey employment figures between the household
Effective in January 2003” in the February and establishment surveys.
2003 issue of Employment and Earnings
(available on the BLS Web site at: http:// Definitions

E m ployed persons include (1) all those

www.bls.gov/cps/rvcps03.pdf).

who worked for pay any time during the
week which includes the 12th day of the
month or who worked unpaid for 15 hours
or more in a family-operated enterprise
and (2) those who were temporarily ab­
sent from their regular jobs because of ill­
ness, vacation, industrial dispute, or simi­
lar reasons. A person working at more than
one job is counted only in the job at which
he or she worked the greatest number of
hours.
U n em p loyed p erson s are those who

Effective in January 2003, bls began us­
ing the X-12 arima seasonal adjustment
program to seasonally adjust national labor
force data. This program replaced the X-l 1
arima program which had been used since
January 1980. See “Revision of Seasonally
Adjusted Labor Force Series in 2003,” in the
February 2003 issue of Employment and
Earnings (available on the BLS Web site at
http:w ww.bls.gov/cps/cpsrs.pdf) for a dis­
cussion of the introduction of the use of X-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

An establishment is an economic unit which
produces goods or services (such as a factory
or store) at a single location and is engaged in
one type of economic activity.
Employed persons are all persons who
received pay (including holiday and sick pay)
for any part of the payroll period including the
12th day of the month. Persons holding more
than one job (about 5 percent of all persons in
the labor force) are counted in each establish­
ment which reports them.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

57

Current Labor Statistics
Production workers in the goods-producing industries cover employees, up through
the level of working supervisors, who engage
directly in the manufacture or construction of
the establishment’s product. In private ser­
vice-providing industries, data are collected for
nonsupervisory workers, which include most
employees except those in executive, manage­
rial, and supervisory positions. Those work­
ers mentioned in tables 11-16 include produc­
tion workers in manufacturing and natural re­
sources and mining; construction workers in
construction; and nonsupervisory workers in
all private service-providing industries. Pro­
duction and nonsupervisory workers account
for about four-fifths of the total employment
on private nonagricultural payrolls.
Earnings are the payments production or
nonsupervisory workers receive during the
survey period, including premium pay for
overtime or late-shift work but excluding
irre g u la r bonuses and other special
paym ents. R eal ea rn in g s are earnings
adjusted to reflect the effects of changes in
consumer prices. The deflator for this series
is derived from the Consumer Price Index
for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
(CPI-W).
Hours represent the average weekly hours

of production or nonsupervisory workers for
which pay was received, and are different from
standard or scheduled hours. Overtime hours
represent the portion of average weekly hours
which was in excess of regular hours and for
which overtime premiums were paid.
The Diffusion Index represents the per­
cent of industries in which employment was
rising over the indicated period, plus one-half
of the industries with unchanged employment;
50 percent indicates an equal balance between
industries with increasing and decreasing em­
ployment. In line with Bureau practice, data
for the 1-, 3-, and 6-month spans are season­
ally adjusted, while those for the 12-month
span are unadjusted. Table 17 provides an in­
dex on private nonfarm employment based on
278 industries, and a manufacturing index
based on 84 industries. These indexes are use­
ful for measuring the dispersion of economic
gains or losses and are also economic indica­
tors.

Notes on the data
Establishment survey data are annually ad­
justed to comprehensive counts of employ­
ment (called “benchmarks”). The March 2002
benchmark was introduced in June 2003 with
the release of data for May 2003, published in
the July 2003 issue of the Review. With the
release in June, CES completed a conversion
from the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
system to the North American Industry Clas­
sification System (naics) and completed the
transition from its original quota sample de­

58

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

sign to a probability-based sample design. The
industry-coding update included reconstruc­
tion of historical estimates in order to preserve
time series for data users. Normally 5 years of
seasonally adjusted data are revised with each
benchmark revision. However, with this re­
lease, the entire new time series history for all
CES data series were re-seasonally adjusted due
to the NAICS conversion, which resulted in the
revision of all ces time series.
Also in June 2003, the CES program intro­
duced concurrent seasonal adjustment for the
national establishment data. Under this meth­
odology, the first preliminary estimates for the
current reference month and the revised esti­
mates for the 2 prior months will be updated
with concurrent factors with each new release
of data. Concurrent seasonal adjustment in­
corporates all available data, including first pre­
liminary estimates for the most current month,
in the adjustment process. For additional in­
formation on all of the changes introduced in
June 2003, see the the June 2003 issue of Em­
ployment and Earnings and “Recent changes
in the national Current Employment Statistics
survey,” Monthly Labor Review, June 2003,
pp. 3-13.
Revisions in State data (table 11) occurred
with the publication of January 2003 data. For
information on the revisions for the State data,
see the March and May 2003 issues of Em­
ployment and Earnings, and “Recent changes
in the State and Metropolitan Area CES sur­
vey,” Monthly Labor Review, June 2003, pp.
14-19.
Beginning in June 1996, the bls uses the
X-12-arima methodology to seasonally ad­
just establishment survey data. This proce­
dure, developed by the Bureau of the Census,
controls for the effect of varying survey inter­
vals (also known as the 4- versus 5-week ef­
fect), thereby providing improved measure­
ment of over-the-month changes and underly­
ing economic trends. Revisions of data, usually
for the most recent 5-year period, are made
once a year coincident with the benchmark re­
visions.
In the establishment survey, estimates for
the most recent 2 months are based on incom­
plete returns and are published as preliminary
in the tables (12-17 in the Review). When all
returns have been received, the estimates are
revised and published as “final” (prior to any
benchmark revisions) in the third month of
their appearance. Thus, December data are
published as preliminary in January and Feb­
ruary and as final in March. For the same rea­
sons, quarterly establishment data (table 1) are
preliminary for the first 2 months of publica­
tion and final in the third month. Thus, fourthquarter data are published as preliminary in
January and February and as final in March.
F or additional information on es­
tablishment survey data, contact the Division of

January 2004

Current Employment Statistics: (202) 691-6555.

Unemployment data by
State
Description of the series
Data presented in this section are obtained from
the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
program, which is conducted in cooperation with
State employment security agencies.
Monthly estimates of the labor force, em­
ployment, and unemployment for States and
sub-State areas are a key indicator of local eco­
nomic conditions, and form the basis for deter­
mining the eligibility of an area for benefits
under Federal economic assistance programs
such as the Job Training Partnership Act. Sea­
sonally adjusted unemployment rates are pre­
sented in table 10. Insofar as possible, the con­
cepts and definitions underlying these data are
those used in the national estimates obtained
from the CPS.

Notes on the data
Data refer to State of residence. Monthly data
for all States and the District of Columbia are
derived using standardized procedures
established by bls. Once a year, estimates are
revised to new population controls, usually
with publication of January estimates, and
benchmarked to annual average cps levels.
For additional information on data in
this series, call (202) 691-6392 (table 10) or
(202) 691-6559 (table 11).

Covered em ploym ent and
wage data (ES-202)
Description of the series
E mployment, wage, and establishment

in this section are derived from the
quarterly tax reports subm itted to State
em ploym ent security agencies by p ri­
vate and State and local governm ent em ­
ployers subject to State unem ploym ent
insurance (ui) laws and from Federal,
agencies subject to the U nem ploym ent
C om pensation for F ederal Em ployees
( ucfe) program. Each quarter, State agen­
cies edit and process the data and send the
information to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The Covered Employment and Wages
data, also referred as ES-202 data, are the
most complete enum eration of em ploy­
ment and wage information by industry at
the national, State, metropolitan area, and
county levels. They have broad economic
significance in evaluating labor market
trends and major industry developments.
data

Definitions
In general, es-202 monthly employment data
represent the number of covered workers
who worked during, or received pay for, the
pay period that included the 12th day of the
month. C overed private industry em ploy­
m ent includes most corporate officials, ex­
ecutives, supervisory personnel, profession­
als, clerical workers, wage earners, piece
workers, and part-time workers. It excludes
proprietors, the unincorporated self-em­
ployed, unpaid family members, and certain
farm and domestic workers. Certain types
of nonprofit employers, such as religious
organizations, are given a choice of coverage
or exclusion in a number of States. Workers
in these organizations are, therefore, reported
to a limited degree.
Persons on paid sick leave, paid holiday,
paid vacation, and the like, are included. Per­
sons on the payroll of more than one firm dur­
ing the period are counted by each ui-subject
employer if they meet the employment defini­
tion noted earlier. The employment count ex­
cludes workers who earned no wages during
the entire applicable pay period because of
work stoppages, temporary layoffs, illness,
or unpaid vacations.
Federal em ploym ent data are based on
reports of monthly employment and quar­
terly wages submitted each quarter to State
agencies for all Federal installations with
employees covered by the Unemployment
Compensation for Federal Employees (ucfe)
program, except for certain national secu­
rity agencies, which are omitted for security
reasons. Employment for all Federal agen­
cies for any given month is based on the
number of persons who worked during or
received pay for the pay period that included
the 12th of the month.
An establishment is an economic unit,
such as a farm, mine, factory, or store, that
produces goods or provides services. It is typi­
cally at a single physical location and engaged
in one, or predominantly one, type of eco­
nomic activity for which a single industrial clas­
sification may be applied. Occasionally, a single
physical location encompasses two or more
distinct and significant activities. Each activity
should be reported as a separate establishment
if separate records are kept and the various
activities are classified under different four­
digit sic codes.
Most employers have only one establish­
ment; thus, the establishment is the predomi­
nant reporting unit or statistical entity for re­
porting employment and wages data. Most
employers, including State and local govern­
ments who operate more than one establish­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ment in a State, file a Multiple Worksite Re­
port each quarter, in addition to their quarterly
ui report. The Multiple Worksite Report is
used to collect separate employment and wage
data for each of the employer’s establishments,
which are not detailed on the ui report. Some
very small multi-establishment employers do
not file a Multiple Worksite Report. When the
total employment in an employer’s secondary
establishments (all establishments other than
the largest) is 10 or fewer, the employer gener­
ally will file a consolidated report for all estab­
lishments. Also, some employers either can­
not or will not report at the establishment level
and thus aggregate establishments into one con­
solidated unit, or possibly several units, though
not at the establishment level.
For the Federal Government, the report­
ing unit is the installation: a single location
at which a department, agency, or other gov­
ernment body has civilian employees. Fed­
eral agencies follow slightly different crite­
ria than do private employers when break­
ing down their reports by installation. They
are permitted to combine as a single state­
wide unit: 1) all installations with 10 or fewer
workers, and 2) all installations that have a
combined total in the State of fewer than 50
workers. Also, when there are fewer than 25
workers in all secondary installations in a State,
the secondary installations may be combined
and reported with the major installation. Last,
if a Federal agency has fewer than five em­
ployees in a State, the agency headquarters
office (regional office, district office) serving
each State may consolidate the employment
and wages data for that State with the data
reported to the State in which the headquarters
is located. As a result of these reporting rules,
the number of reporting units is always larger
than the number of employers (or government
agencies) but smaller than the number of actual
establishments (or installations).
Data reported for the first quarter are tabu­
lated into size categories ranging from worksites
of very small size to those with 1,000 employ­
ees or more. The size category is determined
by the establishment’s March employment
level. It is important to note that each estab­
lishment of a multi-establishment firm is tabu­
lated separately into the appropriate size cat­
egory. The total employment level of the re­
porting multi-establishment firm is not used in
the size tabulation.
Covered employers in most States report
total wages paid during the calendar quarter, re­
gardless of when the services were performed. A
few State laws, however, specify that wages be
reported for, or based on the period during which
services are performed rather than the period dur­
ing which compensation is paid. Under most State
laws or regulations, wages include bonuses, stock
options, the cash value of meals and lodging, tips

and other gratuities, and, in some States, em­
ployer contributions to certain deferred com­
pensation plans such as 401(k) plans.
Covered employer contributions for oldage, survivors, and disability insurance (oasdi),
health insurance, unemployment insurance,
workers’ compensation, and private pension
and welfare funds are not reported as wages.
Employee contributions for the same purposes,
however, as well as money withheld for in­
come taxes, union dues, and so forth, are re­
ported even though they are deducted from
the worker’s gross pay.
Wages o f covered Federal workers rep­
resent the gross amount of all payrolls for all
pay periods ending within the quarter. This
includes cash allowances, the cash equivalent
of any type of remuneration, severance pay,
withholding taxes, and retirement deductions.
Federal employee remuneration generally cov­
ers the same types of services as for workers
in private industry.
Average annual wages per employee for
any given industry are computed by dividing
total annual wages by annual average employ­
ment. A further division by 52 yields average
weekly wages per employee. Annual pay data
only approximate annual earnings because an
individual may not be employed by the same
employer all year or may work for more than
one employer at a time.
Average weekly or annual pay is affected
by the ratio of full-time to part-time workers
as well as the number of individuals in highpaying and low-paying occupations. When
average pay levels between States and indus­
tries are compared, these factors should be
taken into consideration. For example, indus­
tries characterized by high proportions of parttime workers will show average wage levels
appreciably less than the weekly pay levels of
regular full-time employees in these industries.
The opposite effect characterizes industries
with low proportions of part-time workers, or
industries that typically schedule heavy week­
end and overtime work. Average wage data also
may be influenced by work stoppages, labor
turnover rates, retroactive payments, seasonal
factors, bonus payments, and so on.

Notes on the data
Beginning with the release of data for 2001, pub­
lications presenting data from the Covered Em­
ployment and Wages (CEW) program have switched
to the 2002 version of the North American Indus­
try Classificatiion System (NAICS) as the basis
for the assignment and tabulation of economic
data by industry, n a ic s is the product of a
cooperative effort on the part of the statistical
agencies of the United States, Canada, and
Mexico. Due to difference in NAICS and Stan-

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

59

Current Labor Statistics

dard Industrial Classification (SIC) structures, (and New Jersey).
industry data for 2001 is not comparable to
For additional information on the cov­
the sic-based data for earlier years.
ered employment and wage data, contact
Effective January 2001, the CEW program the Division of Administrative Statistics
began assigning Indian Tribal Councils and re­ and Labor Turnover at (202) 691-6567.
lated establishments to local government own­
ership. This b l s action was in response to a
change in Federal law dealing with the way Com pensation and
Indian Tribes are treated under the Federal W age D ata
Unemployment Tax Act. This law requires
(Tables 1-3; 25-31)
federally recognized Indian Tribes to be treated
similarly to State and local governments. In
C o m p e n s a t io n a n d w a g e d a t a are gath­
the past the CEW program coded Indian Tribal
ered by the Bureau from business estab­
Councils and related establishments in the
lishments, State and local governments,
private sector. As a result of the new law,
labor unions, collective bargaining agree­
CEW data reflects significant shifts in em­
ments on file with the Bureau, and sec­
ployment and wages between the private sec­ ondary sources.
tor and local government from 2000 to 2001.
Data also reflect industry changes. Those
Employment Cost Index
accounts previously assigned to civic and
social organizations were assigned to tribal
governments. There were no required indus­ Description of the series
try changes for related establishments owned
The E m ploym ent C ost Index (ECl) is a
by these Tribal Councils. These tribal busi­
quarterly measure of the rate of change in
ness establishments continued to be coded ac­
compensation per hour worked and includes
cording to the economic activity of that entity.
wages, salaries, and employer costs of em­
To insure the highest possible quality of
ployee benefits. It uses a fixed market
data, State employment security agencies
basket of labor— similar in concept to the
verify with employers and update, if neces­
sary, the industry, location, and ownership clas­ Consumer Price Index’s fixed market basket
of goods and services— to measure change
sification of all establishments on a 3-year cycle.
Changes in establishment classification codes over time in employer costs of employing
labor.
resulting from the verification process are in­
Statistical series on total compensation
troduced with the data reported for the first
costs,
on wages and salaries, and on ben­
quarter of the year. Changes resulting from
improved employer reporting also are intro­ efit costs are available for private nonfarm
workers excluding proprietors, the selfduced in the first quarter. For these reasons,
some data, especially at more detailed geo­ employed, and household workers. The
graphic levels, may not be strictly comparable total compensation costs and wages and
salaries series are also available for State
with earlier years.
The2000 county data used to calculate the and local government workers and for the
2000-2001 changes were adjusted for changes civilian nonfarm economy, which consists
in industry and county classification to make of private industry and State and local
them comparable to data for 2001. As a result, government workers combined. Federal
workers are excluded.
the adjusted 2000 data differ to some extent
The Employment Cost Index probabil­
from the data available on the Internet at:
ity sample consists of about 4,400 pri­
http ://www.bls.gov/cew/home.htm.
vate nonfarm establishm ents providing
County definitions are assigned according
about 23,000 occupational observations
to Federal Information Processing Standards
and 1,000 State and local government es­
Publications as issued by the National Insti­
tablishments providing 6,000 occupational
tute of Standards and Technology. Areas observations selected to represent total
shown as counties include those designated employment in each sector. On average,
as independent cities in some jurisdictions each reporting unit provides wage and
and, in Alaska, those areas designated by the compensation information on five wellCensus Bureau where counties have not been specified occupations. Data are collected
created. County data also are presented for each quarter for the pay period including
the New England States for comparative pur­ the 12th day of March, June, September,
poses, even though townships are the more and December.
common designation used in New England
Beginning with June 1986 data, fixed

60

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

employment weights from the 1980 Cen­
sus of Population are used each quarter to
calculate the civilian and private indexes
and the index for State and local govern­
ments. (Prior to June 1986, the employ­
ment weights are from the 1970 Census of
Population.) These fixed w eights, also
used to derive all of the industry and oc­
cu p atio n series in d ex es, en su re that
changes in these indexes reflect only
changes in compensation, not employment
shifts among industries or occupations
with different levels of wages and com­
pensation. For the bargaining status, re­
gion, and metropolitan/nonm etropolitan
area series, however, employment data by
industry and occupation are not available
from the census. Instead, the 1980 em­
ployment weights are reallocated within
these series each quarter based on the cur­
rent sample. Therefore, these indexes are
not strictly comparable to those for the
aggregate, industry, and occupation series.

Definitions
Total com p en sation costs include wages,

salaries, and the em ployer’s costs for em­
ployee benefits.
W ages and sa la ries consist of earn­
ings before payroll deductions, including
production bonuses, incentive earnings,
commissions, and cost-of-living adjust­
ments.
Benefits include the cost to employers
for paid leave, supplemental pay (includ­
ing nonproduction bonuses), insurance, re­
tirement and savings plans, and legally re­
quired benefits (such as Social Security,
workers’ compensation, and unemployment
insurance).
Excluded from wages and salaries and
employee benefits are such items as pay­
ment-in-kind, free room and board, and
tips.

Notes on the data
The Employment Cost Index for changes
in wages and salaries in the private non­
farm economy was published beginning in
1975. C hanges in total com pensation
cost— wages and salaries and benefits
combined— were published beginning in
1980. The series of changes in wages and
salaries and for total compensation in the
State and local government sector and in
the civilian nonfarm economy (excluding
Federal em ployees) were published be-

g in n in g in 1981. H isto ric a l ind ex es
(June 1981 = 100) are available on the
Internet:
http ://w ww .bls.gov/ect/

on the
Employment Cost Index, contact the Of­
fice of Compensation Levels and Trends:
(202) 691-6199.
F or

a d d i t i o n a l in f o r m a t io n

Employee Benefits Survey
Description of the series
E m ployee benefits data are obtained from

the Employee Benefits Survey, an annual
survey of the incidence and provisions of
selected benefits provided by employers.
The survey collects data from a sample of
approxim ately 9,000 private sector and
State and local government establishments.
The data are presented as a percentage of em­
ployees who participate in a certain benefit, or
as an average benefit provision (for exitmple,
the average number of paid holidays provided
to employees per year). Selected data from the
survey are presented in table 25 for medium
and large private establishments and in table
26 for small private establishments and State
and local government.
The survey covers paid leave benefits
such as holidays and vacations, and personal,
funeral, jury duty, military, family, and sick
leave; short-term disability, long-term dis­
ability, and life insurance; medical, dental,
and vision care plans; defined benefit and
defined contribution plans; flexible benefits
plans; reimbursement accounts; and unpaid
family leave.
Also, data are tabulated on the inci­
dence of several other benefits, such as
severance pay, child-care assistance, wellness
program s, and em ployee assistance
programs.

Definitions
E m ployer-provided benefits are benefits

that are financed either wholly or partly by
the employer. They may be sponsored by a
union or other third party, as long as there is
some employer financing. However, some
benefits that are fully paid for by the em­
ployee also are included. For example, long­
term care insurance and postretirement life
insurance paid entirely by the employee are
included because the guarantee of insurabil­
ity and availability at group premium rates
are considered a benefit.
Participants are workers who are covered
by a benefit, whether or not they use that benefit
If the benefit plan is financed wholly by


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

employers and requires employees to complete
a minimum length of service for eligibility, the
workers are considered participants whether or
not they have met the requirement. If workers
are required to contribute towards the cost of a
plan, they are considered participants only if
they elect the plan and agree to make the required
contributions.
Defined benefit pension plans use pre­
determined formulas to calculate a retirement
benefit (if any), and obligate the employer to
provide those benefits. Benefits are generally
based on salary, years of service, or both.
D efined contribution plans generally
specify the level of employer and employee
contributions to a plan, but not the formula for
determining eventual benefits. Instead, indi­
vidual accounts are set up for participants, and
benefits are based on amounts credited to these
accounts.
Tax-deferred savings plans are a type of
defined contribution plan that allow par­
ticipants to contribute a portion of their sal­
ary to an employer-sponsored plan and defer
income taxes until withdrawal.
Flexible benefit plans allow employees
to choose among several benefits, such as life
insurance, medical care, and vacation days, and
among several levels of coverage within a given
benefit.

Notes on the data
Surveys of employees in medium and large
establishments conducted over the 1979-86
period included establishments that employed
at least 50,100, or 250 workers, depending on
the industry (most service industries were
excluded). The survey conducted in 1987
covered only State and local governments with
50 or more employees. The surveys conducted
in 1988 and 1989 included medium and large
establishments with 100 workers or more in
private industries. All surveys conducted over
the 1979-89 period excluded establishments
in Alaska and Hawaii, as well as part-time
employees.
Beginning in 1990, surveys of State and
local governm ents and sm all p riv ate
establishments were conducted in evennumbered years, and surveys of medium and
large establishments were conducted in oddnumbered years. The small establishment
survey includes all p riv ate nonfarm
estab lish m en ts w ith few er than 100
w orkers, w hile the S tate and local
government survey includes all governments,
regardless of the number of workers. All
three surveys include full- and part-time
workers, and workers in all 50 States and
the District of Columbia.

F o r a d d it io n a l in f o r m a t io n on the Em­
ployee Benefits Survey, contact the Office of
Compensation Levels and Trends on the
Internet:

http :/Avww.bls.gov/ebs/

Work stoppages
Description of the series
Data on work stoppages measure the number
and duration of major strikes or lockouts (in­
volving 1,000 workers or more) occurring dur­
ing the month (or year), the number of work­
ers involved, and the amount of work time lost
because of stoppage. These data are presented
in table 31.
Data are largely from a variety of pub­
lished sources and cover only establishments
directly involved in a stoppage. They do
not measure the indirect or secondary effect
of stoppages on other establishments whose
employees are idle owing to material short­
ages or lack of service.

Definitions
The number of
strikes and lockouts involving 1,000 workers
or more and lasting a full shift or longer.
Workers involved: The number of work­
ers directly involved in the stoppage.
N um ber o f days idle: The aggregate
number of workdays lost by workers involved
in the stoppages.

N um ber o f stoppages:

D ays o f id le n e ss as a p e r cen t o f
estim a te d w o rk in g tim e: A ggregate

workdays lost as a percent of the aggregate
number of standard workdays in the period
m ultiplied by total em ploym ent in the
period.

Notes on the data
This series is not comparable with the one
terminated in 1981 that covered strikes in­
volving six workers or more.
F o r a d d it io n a l in f o r m a t io n on work
stoppages data, contact the Office of Com­
pensation and Working Conditions: (202)
691-6282, or the Internet:
http ^www.bls.gov/cba/

Price Data
(Tables 2; 32-42)
d a t a are gathered by the Bureau
of Labor Statistics from retail and pri­
mary markets in the United States. Price in-

P r ic e

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

61

Current Labor Statistics

dexes are given in relation to a base period—
1982 = 100 for many Producer Price Indexes,
1982-84 = 100 for many Consumer Price In­
dexes (unless otherwise noted), and 1990 =
100 for International Price Indexes.

Consumer Price Indexes
Description of the series
The C onsum er P rice Index (CPI) is a mea­
sure of the average change in the prices
paid by urban consumers for a fixed mar­
ket basket of goods and services. The c p i
is calculated monthly for two population
groups, one consistin g only o f urban
households whose primary source of in­
come is derived from the employment of
wage earners and clerical workers, and the
other consisting of all urban households.
The wage earner index (CPi-W) is a continu­
ation of the historic index that was intro­
duced well over a half-century ago for use
in wage negotiations. As new uses were
developed for the c p i in recent years, the
need for a broader and more representa­
tive index became apparent. The all-urban
consumer index (CPi-U), introduced in 1978,
is representative of the 1993-95 buying
habits of about 87 percent of the noninstitutional population of the United States
at that time, com pared with 32 percent
represented in the CPI-W. In addition to
wage earners and clerical workers, the c p i U covers professional, managerial, and tech­
nical workers, the self-employed, short­
term workers, the unemployed, retirees,
and others not in the labor force.
The c p i is based on prices of food,
clothing, shelter, fuel, drugs, transporta­
tion fares, doctors’ and dentists’ fees, and
other goods and services that people buy
for day-to-day living. The quantity and
quality of these items are kept essentially
unchanged between major revisions so that
only price changes will be measured. All
taxes directly associated w ith the pur­
chase and use of items are included in the
index.
Data collected from more than 23,000
retail establishm ents and 5,800 housing
units in 87 urban areas across the country
are used to develop the “U.S. city aver­
age.” Separate estimates for 14 major ur­
ban centers are presented in table 33. The
areas listed are as indicated in footnote 1
to the table. The area indexes measure only
the average change in prices for each area
since the base period, and do not indicate
differences in the level of prices among
cities.

Notes on the d ata
62

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

In January 1983, the Bureau changed the
way in which homeownership costs are
meaured for the CPi-u. A rental equivalence
method replaced the asset-price approach
to homeownership costs for that series. In
January 1985, the same change was made in
the CPi-w. The central purpose of the change
was to separate shelter costs from the in­
vestment component of home-ownership so
that the index would reflect only the cost of
shelter services provided by owner-occu­
pied homes. An updated c p i -u and c p i -w
were introduced with release of the January
1987 and January 1998 data.
F o r a d d it i o n a l in f o r m a t io n , contact
the Division of Prices and Price Indexes:
(202) 691-7000.

together with im plicit quantity weights
representing their importance in the total net
selling value of all commodities as of 1987.
The detailed data are aggregated to obtain
indexes for stage-of-processing groupings,
com m odity g ro u p in g s, d u rab ility -o fproduct groupings, and a number of special
composite groups. All Producer Price Index
data are subject to revision 4 months after
original publication.
F o r a d d it i o n a l i n f o r m a t io n , contact
the Division of Industrial Prices and Price
Indexes: (202) 691-7705.

International Price Indexes
Description of the series

The In tern ation al P rice P rogram pro­
duces monthly and quarterly export and
im port p rice indexes fo r n o n m ilitary
Description of the series
goods and services traded between the
P roducer Price Indexes (PPi) measure av­ United States and the rest of the world.
erage changes in prices received by do­ The export price index provides a measure
mestic producers of commodities in all of price change for all products sold by
stages of processing. The sample used for U.S. residents to foreign buyers. (“Resi­
calculating these indexes currently con­ dents” is defined as in the national income
tains about 3,200 commodities and about accounts; it includes corporations, busi­
80,000 quotations per month, selected to nesses, and individuals, but does not re­
represent the movement of prices of all quire the organizations to be U.S. owned
commodities produced in the manufactur­ nor the individuals to have U.S. citizen­
ing; agriculture, forestry, and fishing; min­ ship.) The import price index provides a
ing; and gas and electricity and public utili­ measure of price change for goods pur­
ties secto rs. The stag e-o f-p ro ce ssin g chased from other countries by U.S. resi­
structure of PPI organizes products by dents.
The product universe for both the im­
class of buyer and degree of fabrication
(that is, fin ish ed goods, in term ed iate port and export indexes includes raw ma­
goods, and crude materials). The tradi­ terials, agricultural products, semifinished
tional commodity structure of p p i orga­ manufactures, and finished manufactures,
nizes products by similarity of end use or in clu d in g both c a p ita l and co n su m er
material composition. The industry and goods. Price data for these items are col­
product structure of p p i organizes data in lected primarily by mail questionnaire. In
accordance with the Standard Industrial nearly all cases, the data are collected di­
Classification (SIC) and the product code rectly from the exporter or importer, al­
extension of the sic developed by the U.S. though in a few cases, prices are obtained
from other sources.
Bureau of the Census.
To the extent possible, the data gath­
To the extent possible, prices used in
calculating Producer Price Indexes apply ered refer to prices at the U.S. border for
to the first significant commercial transac­ exports and at either the foreign border or
tion in the United States from the produc­ the U.S. border for imports. For nearly all
tion or central marketing point. Price data products, the prices refer to transactions
are generally collected monthly, primarily com pleted during the first week of the
by mail questionnaire. Most prices are ob­ month. Survey respondents are asked to
tained directly from producing companies indicate all discounts, allowances, and re­
on a voluntary and confidential basis. bates applicable to the reported prices, so
Prices generally are reported for the Tues­ that the price used in the calculation of
day of the week containing the 13th day the indexes is the actual price for which
of the month.
the product was bought or sold.
Since January 1992, price changes for the
In addition to general indexes of prices for
various commodities have been averaged U.S. exports and imports, indexes are also

Producer Price Indexes

January 2004

published for detailed product categories of
exports and imports. These categories are
defined according to the five-digit level of detail
for the Bureau of Economic Analysis End-use
Classification, the three-digit level for the
Standard Industrial Classification (SiTC), and
the four-digit level of detail for the Harmonized
System. Aggregate import indexes by coun­
try or region of origin are also available.
publishes indexes for selected cat­
egories o f internationally traded services,
calculated on an international basis and on
a balance-of-paym ents basis.
bls

Notes on the d ata
The export and import price indexes are
weighted indexes of the Laspeyres type.
The trade weights currently used to com­
pute both indexes relate to 2000.
Because a price index depends on the same
items being priced from period to period, it is
necessary to recognize when a product’s
specifications or terms of transaction have
been modified. For this reason, the Bureau’s
questionnaire requests detailed descriptions of
the physical and functional characteristics of
the products being priced, as well as informa­
tion on the number of units bought or sold,
discounts, credit terms, packaging, class of
buyer or seller, and so forth. When there are
changes in either the specifications or terms of
transaction of a product, the dollar value of
each change is deleted from the total price
change to obtain the “pure” change. On ce this
value is determined, a linking procedure is em­
ployed which allows for the continued repric­
ing of the item.
F or additional information, contact
the Division of International Prices: (202)
691-7155.

Productivity Data
(Tables 2; 43-46)

Business and major sectors
Description of the series
The productivity measures relate real output
to real input. As such, they encompass a fam­
ily of measures which include single-factor
input measures, such as output per hour, out­
put per unit of labor input, or output per
unit of capital input, as well as meas ures of
multifactor productivity (output per unit of
combined labor and capital inputs). The Bu­
reau indexes show the change in output rela­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

tive to changes in the various inputs. The
measures cover the business, nonfarm busi­
ness, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corpo­
rate sectors.
Corresponding indexes of hourly compen­
sation, unit labor costs, unit nonlabor pay­
ments, and prices are also provided.

Definitions
Output per hour o f all persons (labor pro­

ductivity) is the quantity of goods and ser­
vices produced per hour of labor input. Out­
put per unit o f capital services (capital
productivity) is the quantity of goods and
services produced per unit of capital ser­
vices input. M ultifactor productivity is the
quantity of goods and services produced per
combined inputs. For private business and pri­
vate nonfarm business, inputs include labor
and capital units. For manufacturing, inputs
include labor, capital, energy, nonenergy mate­
rials, and purchased business services.
C om pensation per hour is total com­
pensation divided by hours at work. Total
compensation equals the wages and salaries
of employees plus employers’ contributions
for social insurance and private benefit plans,
plus an estimate of these payments for the
self-employed (except for nonfinancial cor­
porations in which there are no self-em­
ployed). Real com pensation per hour is
com pensation per hour deflated by the
change in the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers.
Unit labor costs are the labor compen­
sation costs expended in the production of a
unit of output and are derived by dividing
compensation by output. U nit nonlabor
paym en ts include profits, depreciation,
interest, and indirect taxes per unit of out­
put. They are computed by subtracting com­
pensation of all persons from current-dollar
value of output and dividing by output.
U nit nonlabor costs contain all the
components of unit nonlabor payments
except unit profits.
U nit p rofits include corporate profits
with inventory valuation and capital con­
sumption adjustments per unit of output.
H o u rs o f a ll p e r so n s are the total
hours at work of payroll workers, selfem ployed persons, and unpaid fam ily
workers.
L abor inputs are hours of all persons
adjusted for the effects of changes in the
education and experience of the labor force.
C apital services are the flow of ser­
vices from the capital stock used in pro­
duction. It is developed from measures of

the net stock of physical assets— equip­
ment, structures, land, and inventories—
weighted by rental prices for each type of
asset.
C om bined units o f lab or and capital
in p u t s a re d e r iv e d by c o m b in in g

changes in labor and capital input w ith
w e ig h ts
w h ic h
re p re se n t
each
c o m p o n e n t’s sh a re o f to ta l c o s t.
Combined units of labor, capital, energy,
m a te r ia ls , an d p u r c h a s e d b u s in e s s
s e rv ic e s are s im ila r ly d e r iv e d by
com bining changes in each input w ith
w eig h ts th a t r e p re s e n t e a ch in p u t’s
share o f to ta l costs. The ind ex es for
each input and for com bined units are
based on changing w eights w hich are
averages of the shares in the current and
preceding year (the T ornquist indexnum ber form ula).

Notes on the data
Business sector output is an annuallyweighted index constructed by excluding
from real gross domestic product (gdp) the
following outputs: general government,
nonprofit institutions, paid employees of
private households, and the rental value
of owner-occupied dwellings. Nonfarm
business also excludes farming. Private
business and private nonfarm business
further exclude government enterprises.
The measures are supplied by the U.S. De­
partment of Com merce’s Bureau of Eco­
nomic Analysis. Annual estimates of manu­
facturing sectoral output are produced by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly
m anufacturing output indexes from the
Federal Reserve Board are adjusted to these
annual output measures by the bls . Com­
pensation data are developed from data of
the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Hours data
are developed from data of the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.
The productivity and associated cost
measures in tables 43-46 describe the re­
lationship between output in real terms
and the labor and capital inputs involved
in its production. They show the changes
from period to period in the amount of
goods and services produced per unit of
input.
Although these measures relate output
to hours and capital services, they do not
measure the contributions of labor, capi­
tal, or any other specific factor of produc­
tion. Rather, they reflect the joint effect
of many influences, including changes in
technology; shifts in the composition of

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

63

Current Labor Statistics

the labor force; capital investment; level
of output; changes in the utilization of
capacity, energy, material, and research
and development; the organization of pro­
duction; managerial skill; and characteris­
tics and efforts of the work force.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this
productivity series, contact the Division
o f P roductivity R esearch: (202) 691 —
5606.

Industry productivity
measures
Description of the series
The b l s industry productivity indexes
measure the relationship between output and
inputs for selected industries and industry
groups, and thus reflect trends in industry
efficiency overtime. Industry measures include
labor productivity, multifactor productivity,
compensation, and unit labor costs.
The industry m easures differ in
methodology and data sources from the
productivity measures for the major sectors
because the industry measures are developed
independently of the National Income and
Product Accounts framework used for the
major sector measures.

Definitions

64

Monthly Labor Review

Notes on the data
The industry measures are compiled from
data produced by the Bureau of Labor Sta­
tistics and the Bureau of the Census,with
additional data supplied by other govern­
m ent agencies, trade associations, and
other sources.
For most industries, the productivity
indexes refer to the output per hour of all
employees. For some trade and services
industries, indexes of output per hour of
all persons (including self-employed) are
constructed. For some transportation in­
dustries, only indexes of output per em­
ployee are prepared.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this
series, contact the D ivision of Industry
Productivity Studies: (202) 691-5618.

International
Comparisons
(Tables 47-49)

Output per hour is derived by dividing an
index of industry output by an index of labor
input. For most industries, output indexes are
derived from data on the value of industry out­
put adjusted for price change. For the remain­
ing industries, output indexes are derived from
data on the physical quantity of production.
The labor input series consist of the hours of
all employees (production workers and nonpro­
duction workers), the hours of all persons (paid
employees, partners, proprietors, and unpaid fam­
ily workers), or the number of employees, de­
pending upon the industry.
Unit labor costs represent the labor com­
pensation costs per unit of output produced,
and are derived by dividing an index of labor
compensation by an index of output. Labor
com pensation includes payroll as well as
supplemental payments, including both legally
required expenditures and payments for vol­
untary programs.
Multifactor productivity is derived by
dividing an index of industry output by an
index of the combined inputs consumed in pro­
ducing that output. Combined inputs in­
clude capital, labor, and intermediate pur­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

chases. The measure of capital input used
represents the flow of services from the capi­
tal stock used in production. It is developed
from measures of the net stock of physical
assets— equipment, structures, land, and in­
ventories. The measure of interm ediate
purchases is a combination of purchased
materials, services, fuels, and electricity.

Labor force and
unemployment
Description of the series
Tables 47 and 48 present comparative meas­
ures of the labor force, employment, and un­
em ployment— approxim ating U.S. con­
cepts—for the United States, Canada, Aus­
tralia, Japan, and several European countries.
The unemployment statistics (and, to a
lesser extent, employment statistics) pub­
lished by other industrial countries are not,
in most cases, comparable to U.S. unem­
ployment statistics. Therefore, the Bureau
adjusts the figures for selected countries,
where necessary, for all known major defi­
nitional differences. A lthough precise
comparability may not be achieved, these
adjusted figures provide a better basis for
international comparisons than the figures
regularly published by each country. For
further inform ation on adjustments and
co m p arab ility issu es, see C o n stan ce
Sorrentino, “International unemployment
rates: how comparable are they?” Monthly

January 2004

Labor Review, June 2000, pp. 3-20.

Definitions
For the principal U.S. definitions of the labor
force, employment, and unemployment, see
the Notes section on Employment and Unem­
ployment Data: Household survey data.

Notes on the data
The adjusted statistics have been adapted to
the age at which compulsory schooling ends
in each country, rather than to the U.S. stan­
dard of 16 years of age and older. Therefore,
the adjusted statistics relate to the popula­
tion aged 16 and older in France, Sweden, and
the United Kingdom; 15 and older in Austra­
lia, Japan, Germany, Italy from 1993 onward,
and the Netherlands; and 14 and older in Italy
prior to 1993. An exception to this rule is
that the Canadian statistics for 1976 onward
are adjusted to cover ages 16 and older,
whereas the age at which compulsory school­
ing ends remains at 15. The institutional
population is included in the denominator of
the labor force participation rates and em­
ployment-population ratios for Japan and
Germany; it is excluded for the United States
and the other countries.
In the U.S. labor force survey, persons on
layoff who are awaiting recall to their jobs
are classified as unemployed. European and
Japanese layoff practices are quite different
in nature from those in the United States;
therefore, strict application of the U.S. defi­
nition has not been made on this point. For
further information, see Monthly Labor Re­
view, December 1981, pp. 8-11.
The figures for one or more recent years
for France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
and the United Kingdom are calculated using
adjustment factors based on labor force sur­
veys for earlier years and are considered pre­
liminary. The recent-year measures for these
countries, therefore, are subject to revision
whenever data from more current labor force
surveys become available.
There are breaks in the data series for the
United States (1990,1994,1997,1998,1999,
2000), Canada (1976) France (1992), Ger­
many (1991), Italy (1991, 1993), the Neth­
erlands (1988), and Sweden (1987).
For the United States, the break in series
reflects a major redesign of the labor force
survey questionnaire and collection method­
ology introduced in January 1994. Revised
population estimates based on the 1990 cen­
sus, adjusted for the estimated undercount,
also were incorporated. In 1996, previously
published data for the 1990-93 period were

revised to reflect the 1990 census-based
population controls, adjusted for the un­
dercount. In 1997, revised population con­
trols were introduced into the household sur­
vey. Therefore, the data are not strictly
conparable with prior years. In 1998, new
composite estimation procedures and minor
revisions in population controls were intro­
duced into the household survey. Therefore,
the data are not strictly comparable with data
for 1997 and earlier years. See the Notes sec­
tion on Employment and Unemployment
Data of this Review.
b l s recently introduced a new adjusted
series for Canada. Beginning with the data
for 1976, Canadian data are adjusted tc more
closely approximate U.S. concepts. Adjust­
ments are made to the unemployed anc. labor
force to exclude: (1) 15-year-olds; (2) pas­
sive jobseekers (persons only reading news­
paper ads as their method of job search); (3)
persons waiting to start a new job who did
not seek work in the past 4 weeks; and (4)
persons unavailable for work due to personal
or family responsibilities. An adjustment is
made to include full-tine students looking for
full-time work. The impact of the adjust­
ments was to lower the annual average unem­
ployment rate by 0.1-0.4 percentage; point
in the 1980s and 0.4-1.0 percentage point in
the 1990s.
For France, the 1992 break reflects the
substitution of standardized European Union
Statistical Office ( e u r o s t a t ) unemployment
statistics for the unemployment data esti­
mated according to the International Labor
Office ( il o ) definition and published in the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) annual yearbook and
quarterly update. This change was made be­
cause the e u r o s t a t data are more up-to-date
than the o e c d figures. Also, since 1992, the
e u r o s t a t definitions are closer to the U.S.
definitions than they were in prior years. The
impact of this revision was to lower the un­
employment rate by 0.1 percentage point in
1992 and 1993, by 0.4 percentage point in
1994, and 0.5 percentage point in 1995.
For Germany, the data for 1991 onward
refer to unified Germany. Data prior to 1991
relate to the former West Germany. The im­
pact of including the former East Germany
was to increase the unemployment rate from
4.3 to 5.6 percent in 1991.
For Italy, the 1991 break reflects a revi­
sion in the method of weighting sample
data. The impact was to increase the un­
em ploym ent rate by approxim ately 0.3
percentage point, from 6.6 to 6.9 percent
in 1991.
In October 1992, the survey methodol­
ogy was revised and the definition of unem­
ployment was changed to include only those


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

who were actively looking for a job within
the 30 days preceding the survey and who
were available for work. In addition, the
lower age limit for the labor force was raised
from 14 to 15 years. (Prior to these changes,
BLS adjusted Italy’s published unemploy­
ment rate downward by excluding from the
unemployed those persons who had not
actively sought work in the past 30 days.)
The break in the series also reflects the incor­
poration of the 1991 population census re­
sults. The impact of these changes was to
raise Italy’s adjusted unemployment rate by
approximately 1.2 percentage points, from
8.3 to 9.5 percent in fourth-quarter 1992.
These changes did not affect employment
significantly, except in 1993. Estimates by
the Italian Statistical Office indicate that em­
ployment declined by about 3 percent in
1993, rather than the nearly 4 percent indi­
cated by the data shown in table 44. This
difference is attributable mainly to the incor­
poration of the 1991 population benchmarks
in the 1993 data. Data for earlier years have
not been adjusted to incorporate the 1991
census results.
For the Netherlands, a new survey ques­
tionnaire was introduced in 1992 that allowed
for a closer application of il o guidelines.
e u r o s t a t has revised the Dutch series back
to 1988 based on the 1992 changes. The 1988
revised unemployment rate is 7.6 percent;
the previous estimate for the same year was
9.3 percent.
There have been two breaks in series in
the Swedish labor force survey, in 1987 and
1993. Adjustments have been made for the
1993 break back to 1987. In 1987, a new
questionnaire was introduced. Questions
regarding current availability were added
and the period of active workseeking was
reduced from 60 days to 4 weeks. These
changes lowered Sw eden’s 1987 unem ­
ploym ent rate by 0.4 percentage point,
from 2.3 to 1.9 percent. In 1993, the mea­
surement period for the labor force sur­
vey was changed to represent all 52 weeks
of the year rather than one week each
month and a new adjustment for popula­
tion totals was introduced. The impact
was to raise the unem ployment rate by
approximately 0.5 percentage point, from
7.6 to 8.1 percent. Statistics Sweden re­
vised its labor force survey data for 1987—
92 to take into account the break in 1993.
The adjustment raised the Swedish unem­
ployment rate by 0.2 percentage point in
1987 and gradually rose to 0.5 percentage
point in 1992.
Beginning with 1987, BLS has adjusted the
Swedish data to classify students who also
sought work as unemployed. The impact of

this change was to increase the adjusted un­
employment rate by 0.1 percentage point in
1987 and by 1.8 percentage points in 1994,
when unemployment was higher. In 1998,
the adjusted unemployment rate had risen
from 6.5 to 8.4 percent due to the adjustment
to include students.
The net effect of the 1987 and 1993
changes and the BLS adjustment for stu­
dents seeking w ork low ered S w eden’s
1987 unemployment rate from 2.3 to 2.2
percent.
f o r a d d it io n a l in f o r m a t io n on this se­
ries, contact the Division of Foreign Labor
Statistics: (202) 691-5654.

Manufacturing productivity
and labor costs
Description of the series
Table 49 presents comparative indexes of
manufacturing labor productivity (output per
hour), output, total hours, compensation per
hour, and unit labor costs for the United
States, Canada, Japan, and nine European
countries. These measures are trend compari­
sons— that is, series that measure changes
over time—rather than level comparisons.
There are greater technical problems in com­
paring the levels of manufacturing output
among countries.
BLS constructs the comparative indexes
from three basic aggregate measures—output,
total labor hours, and total compensation.
The hours and compensation measures refer
to all employed persons (wage and salary
earners plus self-employed persons and un­
paid family workers) in the United States,
Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Norway,
and Sweden, and to all employees (wage and
salary earners) in the other countries.

Definitions
O utput, in general, refers to value added

in manufacturing from the national ac­
counts of each country. However, the
output series for Japan prior to 1970 is
an index of industrial production, and the
national accounts measures for the United
Kingdom are essentially identical to their
indexes of industrial production.
The 1 9 7 7 -9 7 o u tp u t d ata fo r the
United States are the gross product origi­
nating (value added) measures prepared
by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of
the U.S. Department of Commerce. Com­
parable manufacturing output data cur­
rently are not available prior to 1977.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

65

Current Labor Statistics

U.S. gross product originating is a chaintype annual-weighted series. (For more in­
formation on the U.S. measure, see Robert
E. Yuskavage, “Im proved Estim ates of
G ross P roduct by Industry, 1 959-94,”
Survey o f Current Business, August 1996,
pp. 133-55.) The Japanese value added
series is based upon one set of fixed price
weights for the years 1970 through 1997.
Output series for the other foreign econo­
mies also employ fixed price weights, but
the weights are updated periodically (for
example, every 5 or 10 years).
To preserve the comparability of the
U.S. measures with those for other econo­
mies, bls uses gross product originating
in manufacturing for the United States for
these comparative measures. The gross
product originating series differs from the
manufacturing output series that bls pub­
lishes in its news releases on quarterly
measures of U.S. productivity and costs
(and that underlies the measures that ap­
pear in tables 43 and 45 in this section).
The quarterly measures are on a “sectoral
output” basis, rather than a value-added
basis. Sectoral output is gross output less
intrasector transactions.
Total labor hours refers to hours worked
in all countries. The measures are developed
from statistics of manufacturing employment
and average hours. The series used for France
(from 1970 forward), Norway, and Sweden
are official series published with the national
accounts. Where official total hours series are
not available, the measures are developed by
BLS using employment figures published with
the national accounts, or other comprehen­
sive employment series, and estimates of an­
nual hours worked. For Germany, bls uses
estimates of average hours worked developed
by a research institute connected to the Min­
istry of Labor for use with the national ac­
counts employment figures. For the other
countries, BLS constructs its own estimates
of average hours.
Denmark has not published estimates of
average hours for 1994—97; therefore, the
bls measure of labor input for Denmark ends
in 1993.
Total compensation (labor cost) includes
all payments in cash or in-kind made directly
to employees plus employer expenditures for
legally required insurance programs and con­
tractual and private benefit plans. The mea­
sures are from the national accounts of each
country, except those for Belgium, which are
developed by bls using statistics on employ­
ment, average hours, and hourly compensa­
tion. For Canada, France, and Sweden, com­
pensation is increased to account for other sig­
nificant taxes on payroll or employment. For
the United Kingdom, compensation is reduced
between 1967 and 1991 to account for em­

66

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ployment-related subsidies. Self-employed
workers are included in the all-employed-persons measures by assuming that their hourly
compensation is equal to the average for wage
and salary employees.

Notes on the data
In general, the measures relate to total manu­
facturing as defined by the International Stan­
dard Industrial Classification. However, the
measures for France (for all years) and Italy
(beginning 1970) refer to mining and manu­
facturing less energy-related products, and
the measures for Denmark include mining and
exclude manufacturing handicrafts from 1960
to 1966.
The m easures for recent years may
be based on current indicators of m anu­
fa c tu rin g o u tp u t (su ch as in d u stria l
production indexes), em ploym ent, av­
erage hours, and hourly com pensation
until national accounts and other sta­
tistics used for the long-term m easures
become available.
F or ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this
series, contact the D ivision of Foreign
Labor Statistics: (202) 691-5654.

Occupational Injury
and Illness Data
(Tables 50-51)

Survey of Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses
Description of the series
The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Ill­
nesses collects data from employers about
their workers’ job-related nonfatal injuries
and illnesses. The information that employ­
ers provide is based on records that they
maintain under the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970. Self-employed individu­
als, farms with fewer than 11 employees,
employers regulated by other Federal safety
and health laws, and Federal, State, and lo­
cal government agencies are excluded from
the survey.
The survey is a Federal-State coopera­
tive program with an independent sample
selected for each participating State. A
stratified random sample with a Neyman
allocation is selected to represent all pri­
vate industries in the State. The survey is
stratified by Standard Industrial Classifi­
cation and size of employment.

January 2004

Definitions
Under the Occupational Safety and Health
Act, employers maintain records of nonfatal
work-related injuries and illnesses that in­
volve one or more of the following: loss of
consciousness, restriction of work or motion,
transfer to another job, or medical treatment
other than first aid.
Occupational injury is any injury such as
a cut, fracture, sprain, or amputation that re­
sults from a work-related event or a single, in­
stantaneous exposure in the work environment.
Occupational illness is an abnormal con­
dition or disorder, other than one resulting from
an occupational injury, caused by exposure to
factors associated with employment. It in­
cludes acute and chronic illnesses or disease
which may be caused by inhalation, absorp­
tion, ingestion, or direct contact.
Lost workday injuries and illnesses are
cases that involve days away from work, or
days of restricted work activity, or both.
L ost w orkdays include the number of
workdays (consecutive or not) on which
the employee was either away from work
or at work in some restricted capacity, or
both, because of an occupational injury or
illness, bls measures of the number and
incidence rate of lost workdays were dis­
continued beginning w ith the 1993 sur­
vey. The num ber o f days aw ay from
work or days of restricted work activity
does not include the day of injury or on­
set of illness or any days on which the
em ployee would not have worked, such
as a Federal holiday, even though able to
work.
Incidence rates are computed as the num­
ber of injuries and/or illnesses or lost work
days per 100 full-time workers.

Notes on the data
The definitions of occupational injuries and
illnesses are from Recordkeeping Guidelines
fo r Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Sta­
tistics, September 1986).
Estimates are made for industries and em­
ployment size classes for total recordable cases,
lost workday cases, days away from work
cases, and nonfatal cases without lost work­
days. These data also are shown separately for
injuries. Illness data are available for seven cat­
egories: occupational skin diseases or disorders,
dust diseases of the lungs, respiratory condi­
tions due to toxic agents, poisoning (systemic
effects of toxic agents), disorders due to physi­
cal agents (other than toxic materials), disorders
associated with repeated trauma, and all other
occupational illnesses.
The survey continues to measure the num-

ber of new work-related illness cases which are
recognized, diagnosed, and reported during the
year. Some conditions, for example, long -term
latent illnesses caused by exposure to carcino­
gens, often are difficult to relate to the work­
place and are not adequately recognized and
reported. These long-term latent illnesses are
believed to be understated in the survey’s ill­
ness measure. In contrast, the overwhelming
majority of the reported new illnesses are those
which are easier to directly relate to workplace
activity (for example, contact dermatitis and
carpal tunnel syndrome).
Most of the estimates are in the form of
incidence rates, defined as the number of
injuries and illnesses per 100 equivalent
fu ll-tim e w ork ers. F or this purp o se,
200,000 em ployee hours represent 100
em ployee years (2,000 hours per em ­
ployee). Full detail on the available mea­
sures is presented in the annual bulletin,
O ccu p a tio n a l In ju rie s and Illn e sses:
Counts, Rates, and Characteristics.
Comparable data for more than 40 States
and territories are available from the b l s Of­
fice of Safety, Health and Working Condi­
tions. Many of these States publish data on
State and local government employees in ad­
dition to private industry data.
Mining and railroad data are furnished to
b l s by the Mine Safety and Health Ad minis­
tration and the Federal Railroad Admi nistra­
tion. Data from these organizations are in­
cluded in both the national and State data
published annually.
With the 1992 survey, b l s began publish­
ing details on serious, nonfatal incidents re­
sulting in days away from work. Included are
some major characteristics of the injured and
ill workers, such as occupation, age, gender,
race, and length of service, as well as the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

circumstances of their injuries and illnesses
(nature of the disabling condition, part of
body affected, event and exposure, and the
source directly producing the condition). In
general, these data are available nationwide
for detailed industries and for individual
States at more aggregated industry levels.
F o r a d d it io n a l in f o r m a t io n on occu­
pational injuries and illnesses, contact the Of­
fice of Occupational Safety, Health and Work­
ing Conditions at (202) 691-6180, or access
the Internet at:
http ://www.bls.gov/iif/

Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries
The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
compiles a complete roster of fatal job-re­
lated injuries, including detailed data about
the fatally injured workers and the fatal
events. The program collects and cross
checks fatality information from multiple
sources, including death certificates, State
and Federal workers’ compensation reports,
Occupational Safety and Health Administra­
tion and Mine Safety and Health Adminis­
tration records, medical examiner and au­
topsy reports, media accounts, State motor
vehicle fatality records, and follow-up ques­
tionnaires to employers.
In addition to private wage and salary
workers, the self-employed, family members,
and Federal, State, and local government
workers are covered by the program. To be
included in the fatality census, the decedent
must have been employed (that is working
for pay, compensation, or profit) at the time
of the event, engaged in a legal work activity,
or present at the site of the incident as a re­
quirement of his or her job.

Definition
A fatal w ork injury is any intentional or

unintentional wound or dam age to the
body resulting in death from acute expo­
sure to energy, such as heat or electricity,
or kinetic energy from a crash, or from the
absence of such essentials as heat or oxy­
gen caused by a specific event or incident
or series of events within a single work­
day or shift. Fatalities that occur during a
person’s commute to or from work are ex­
cluded from the census, as well as workrelated illnesses, which can be difficult
to identify due to long latency periods.

Notes on the data
Twenty-eight data elements are collected,
coded, and tabulated in the fatality pro­
gram, including information about the fa­
tally injured worker, the fatal incident, and
the m achinery or equipm ent involved.
Summary worker demographic data and
event characteristics are included in a na­
tional news release that is available about
8 months after the end of the reference
year. The Census of Fatal Occupational
Injuries was initiated in 1992 as a joint
F ederal-State effort. M ost States issue
summary information at the time of the
national news release.
F o r a d d it i o n a l in f o r m a t io n on the
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries con­
tact the b l s Office of Safety, Health, and
Working Conditions at (202) 691-6175, or
the Internet at:
http://www.bls.gov/iif/

Where to find additional data
Current and historical statistics from Bureau o f Labor Statistics surveys are
available at the addresses listed on the inside back cover o f this Review, or on
the Internet at

http://www.bls.gov

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

67

Current Labor Statistics: Comparative Indicators

1. Labor market indicators
2001

Selected indicators

2001

2002

2003

2002
IV

III

1

III

II

IV

1

II

III

Em ployment data

Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional
population (household survey):1
66.4
66.7
66.6
66.7
66.6
66.5
66.3
66.2
Labor force participation rate..........................................
66.8
66.6
66.8
62.4
62.1
Employment-population ratio...........................................
63.7
62.7
63.0
62.8
62.8
62.8
62.5
62.3
63.5
4.7
4.8
5.6
5.6
5.9
5.8
5.9
5.8
6.2
6.1
Unemployment rate......................................................
5.8
5.7
5.7
6.0
6.1
6.5
6.4
Men.......................................................................
4.8
5.9
4.9
5.9
6.0
11.4
12.4
14.2
11.4
12.7
12.9
12.8
13.1
12.5
13.9
16 to 24 years.........................................................
12.8
4.9
4.4
4.7
4.9
5.2
4.7
3.7
4.5
4.8
5.3
25 years and older...................................................
3.6
5.7
5.7
Women..................................................................
4.7
5.6
4.8
5.5
5.5
5.7
5.6
5.5
5.8
11.4
11.1
16 to 24 years.........................................................
11.1
10.7
11.0
11.2
10.9
11.9
11.6
9.6
10.1
4.4
4.7
4.4
4.8
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.6
3.7
4.6
3.8
25 years and older...................................................
Employment, nonfarm(payroll data), inthousands:1
Total nonfarm............................................................. 131,826 130,376 131,712 130,920 130,523 130,403 130,239 130,338 130,225 129,984 129,911
Total private...................................................... 110,707 108,886 110,516 109,593 109,105 108,918 108,755 108,792 108,655 108,488 108,442
Goods-producing..................................................... 23,873 22,619 23,684 23,226 22,880 22,673 22,537 22,389 22,213 22,093 21,984
16,441
15,306 16,243 15,833 15,517 15,369 15,246 15,085 14,926 14,744 14,596
Manufacturing......................................................
Service-providing.................................................... 107,952 107,757 108,028 107,694 107,643 107,730 107,702 107,949 108,012 107,891 107,927
Average hours:
33.7
33.7
33.9
33.9
33.9
33.8
33.8
34.0
33.9
33.9
33.8
Total private.............................................................
40.4
40.4
40.2
40.4
40.4
40.6
40.5
40.3
Manufacturing.........................................................
40.3
40.5
40.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.0
3.8
4.0
4.3
Overtime.............................................................
4.0
Employment Cost Index2

Percent change inthe ECI, compensation:
All workers (excluding farm, household and Federal workers)...
Private industryworkers..............................................
Goods-producing3..................................................
Service-providing3..................................................
State and local government workers
Workers by bargaining status (private industry):
Union.......................................................................
Nonunion...................................................................

4.1
4.2
3.8
4.3
4.2

3.4
3.2
3.7
3.1
4.1

1.2
.9
.7
1.0
2.1

.8
.8
.8
.8
.6

1.0
1.1
1.2
1.1
.6

.9
1.1
.9
1.2
.4

.9
.6
.6
.6
2.2

.6
.4
.9
.2
.9

1.4
1.7
1.8
1.5
.7

.8
.8
.9
.8
.4

1.1
1.0
.7
1.1
1.7

4.2
4.1

4.2
3.2

1.0
.9

1.4
.7

1.1
1.1

1.0
1.1

1.2
.5

.9
.4

1.6
1.6

1.2
.8

1.0
1.0

1 Quarterly data seasonally adjusted.
2 Annual changes are December-to-December changes. Quarterly changes are calculated
using the last month of each quarter.
3 Goods-producing industries include mining, construction, and manufacturing. Serviceproviding industries include all other private sector industries.

68

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

NOTE: Beginning in January 2003, household survey data reflect revised population
controls. Nonfarm data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American
Industry Classification System (NAics), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
system. NAics-based data by industry are not comparable with sic-based data.

2. Annual and quarterly percent changes in compensation, prices, and productivity
2002

Compensation data

III

II

I

IV

III

II

I

IV

III

2003

2002

2001
2001

Selected m easures
1.2

Employment Cost Index—compensation (wages,
salaries, benefits):
Civilian nonfarm........................................
Private nonfarm......................................
Employment Cost Index—wages and salaries:
Civilian nonfarm........................................
Private nonfarm.....................................

4.1
4.2

3.4
3.2

1.2
.9

0.8
.8

1.0
1.1

0.9
1.1

0.9
.6

0.6
.4

1.4
1.7

0.8
.8

1.1
1.0

3.7
3.8

2.9
2.7

1.0
.8

.7
.8

.9
.9

.8
1.0

.7
.4

.4
.3

1.0
1.1

.6
.7

.9
.8

Consumer Price Index (All Urban Consumers) : All Items..

3.4

1.2

.2

-.9

.7

.5

.6

-.1

1.8

-.3

-.2

Producer Price Index:
Finished goods.....................................................
Finished consumer goods....................................
Capital equipment..............................................
Intermediate materials, supplies, and components.......
Crude materials.....................................................

-1.8
-2.4
1.0
-.2
-8.8

-1.2
-1.6
-.4
-1.2
-10.6

-.3
-.3
-.1
-1.0
-12.0

-3.2
-4.3
.1
-3.6
-12.2

1.1
1.5
2.9
.9
8.0

.2
.4
-.3
1.1
37.1

.2
.0
-.7
1.1
1.9

-.1
-.3
.6
.1
6.5

3.7
2.4
.6
6.5
28.0

-.8
1.8
-.6
-2.1
-10.6

.3
.3
-.1
-.1
3.4

8.7
8.3
10.8

8.7
9.3
5.0

.8
1.0
5.5

5.9
5.9
3.1

1.5
1.7
3.8

2.7
2.1
3.4

7.4
7.0
8.4

7.4
8.1

Price data

Productivity data

Output per hour of all persons:
3.3
5.3
2.0
Business sector..................
3.4
5.4
1.9
Nonfarmbusiness sector......
4.4
5.8
2.0
Nonfinancial corporations4....
1 Annual changes are December-to-December changes. Quarterly changes are
calculated using the last month of each quarter. Compensation and price data are not
seasonally adjusted, and the price data are not compounded.
2 Excludes Federal and private household workers.

3 Annual rates of change are computed by comparing annual averages.
Quarterly percent changes reflect annual rates of change in quarterly indexes.
The data are seasonally adjusted.
4 Output per hour of all employees.

3. Alternative measures of w ag e and compensation changes
Four quarters ending

Q uarterly average
2002

Com ponents

Average hourly compensation:1

Employment Cost Index—compensation:
2

Employment Cost Index—wages and salaries:
2

III

II

1

IV

III

III

II

1

IV

III

2003

2002

2003

2.1
2.0

1.6
1.6

3.2
2.6

4.1
3.6

2.4
3.1

2.9
2.9

2.8
2.8

2.7
2.5

2.8
2.4

2.8
2.7

.9
.6
1.2
.5
2.2

.6
.4
.9
.4
.9

1.4
1.7
1.6
1.6
.7

.8
.8
1.2
.8
.4

1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7

3.7
3.7
4.7
3.5
3.8

3.4
3.2
4.2
3.2
4.1

3.9
3.8
4.7
3.6
4.2

3.7
3.5
5.0
3.3
4.1

3.9
4.0
4.8
3.8
3.6

.6
.7
.7
.7
.3

.9
.8
.6
.9
1.0

3.2
3.2
4.3
3.1
3.1

2.9
2.7
3.5
2.7
3.2

2.9
3.0
3.3
2.9
3.1

2.7
2.6
3.0
2.5
3.1

2.9
3.0
2.6
3.1
2.3

1.0
.4
.7
1.1
.4
.3
.5
.8
1.0
1.2
.3
.4
.4
.6
1.8
State and local governments............................................
1 Seasonally adjusted. "Quarterly average" is percent change froma quarter ago, at an annual rate.

2 Excludes Federal and household workers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

69

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

4. Employment status of the population, by sex, age, race, and Hispanic origin, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[Numbers in thousands]
Employment status

2002

Annual average
2001

2002

Nov.

Dec.

2003
Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

TOTAL

Civilian noninstitutional
population1................
Civilian labor force........ ...
Participation rate....
Employed............... ..
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2........
Unemployed............
Unemployment rate.
Not inthe labor force... ..
Men, 20 years and over

Civilian noninstitutional
population1.................
Civilian labor force........ ..
Participation rate.....
Employed................ .
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2........
Unemployed............
Unemployment rate..
Not inthe labor force..... .

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

215,092 217,570 218,548 218,741 219,897 220,114 220,317 220,540 220,768 221,014
221,252 221,507 221,779 222,039 22,227
143 734 144,863 145,180 145,150 145,838 145,857 145,793 146,473 146,485
147,096 146,540 146,530 146,545 146,793 14,727
66 8
66.6
66.4
66.4
66.3
66.3
66.2
66.4
66.4
66.6
66.2
66.2
66.1
66.1
66.3
136 933 136,485 136,542 136,439 137,536 137,408 137,348 137,687 137,487
137,738 137,478 137,625 137,573 138,014 138,603
63.7
62 7
62.5
62.4
62.5
62.4
62.3
62.4
62.3
62.3
62.1
62.1
62.0
62.2
62.4
6,801
8,378
8,637
8,711
8,302
8,450
8,445
8,786
8,998
9,358
9,062
8,905
8,973
8,779
8,674
4.7
5.8
5.9
6.0
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.1
6.4
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.0
5.9
71,359 72,707 73,369 73,591 74,059 74,257 74,524 74,067 74,283 73,918
74,712 74,977 75,234 75,246 75,002
95,181
72,816
76.5
69,776

96,439
73,630
76.3
69,734

97,022
73,770
76.0
69,617

97,139
73,744
75.9
69,600

97,635
73,993
75.8
69,967

97,762
74,254
76.0
70,293

97,869
74,236
75.9
70,293

97,979
74,571
76.1
70,364

98,083
74,506
76.0
70,144

98,196
74,692
76.1
70,130

98,304
74,581
75.9
70,193

98,434
74,561
75.7
70,203

98,568
74,905
76.0
70,610

98,696
74,860
75.8
70,665

98,814
75,252
76.2
70,978

73.3
3,040
4.2
22,365

72.3
3,896
5.3
22,809

71.8
4,153
5.6
23,252

71.6
4,145
5.6
23,394

71.7
4,026
5.4
23,642

71.9
3,962
5.3
23,508

71.8
3,944
5.3
23,632

71.8
4,207
5.6
23,408

71.5
4,362
5.9
23,577

71.4
4,562
6.1
23,504

71.4
4,388
5.9
23,724

71.3
4,357
5.8
23,873

71.6
4,295
5.7
23,662

71.6
4,195
5.6
23,837

71.8
4,274
5.7
23,562

Civilian noninstitutional
population1................. 103,983 105,136 105,594 105,678 106,235 106,322 106,411 106,510
Civilian labor force........ . 63,016 63,648 63,921 64,036 64,479 64,310 64,477 64,677 106,613 106,724 106,839 106,957 107,080 107,197
64,733 65,148 64,819 64,831 64,554 64,904
Participation rate.....
60.6
60.5
60.5
60.6
60.7
60.5
60.6
60.7
60.7
61.0
60.7
60.6
60.3
60.5
Employed................ 60,417 60,420 60,697 60,676 61,443 61,073 61,227
61,401 61,436 61,753 61,462 61,470 61,120 61,519
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2........
58.1
57.5
57.5
57.4
57.8
57.4
57.5
57.6
57.6
57.9
57.5
57.5
57.1
57.4
Unemployed............
2,599
3,228
3,224
3,360
3,035
3,237
3,250
3,276
3,297
3,395
3,357
3,361
3,434
3,384
Unemployment rate..
4.1
5.1
5.0
5.2
4.7
5.0
5.0
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.2
Not inthe laborforce..... 40,967 41,488 41,673 41,642 41,757 42,013 41,933 41,834
41,880 41,576 42,020 42,126 42,526 42,294

10,730
64,920
60.5
61,621
57.4
3,298
5.1
42,384

Both sexes, 16 to 19 years

Civilian noninstitutional
population1.................
Civilian labor force.........
Participation rate.....
Employed................
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2.........
Unemployed.............
Unemployment rate..
Not inthe laborforce....

15,929
7,902
49.6
6,740

15,994
7,585
47.4
6,332

15,933
7,489
47.0
6,228

15,925
7,369
46.3
6,164

16,027
7,366
46.0
6,125

16,030
7,293
45.5
6,042

16,038
7,079
44.1
5,829

16,051
7,226
45.0
5,923

16,072
7,246
45.1
5,907

16,095
7,256
45.1
5,855

16,109
7,140
44.3
5,823

16,116
7,139
44.3
5,952

16,131
7,086
43.9
5,842

16,145
7,030
43.5
5,830

16,162
7,106
44.0
6,003

42.3
1,162
14.7
8,027

39.6
1,253
16.5
8,409

39.1
1,261
16.8
8,444

38.7
1,206
16.4
8,555

38.2
1,241
16.8
8,661

37.7
1,251
17.1
8,736

36.3
1,251
17.7
8,959

36.9
1,303
18.0
8,825

36.8
1,339
18.5
8,826

36.4
1,401
19.3
8,839

36.1
1,317
18.4
8,969

36.9
1,187
16.4
8,977

36.2
1,243
17.5
9,046

36.1
1,200
17.1
9,115

37.1
1,102
15.5
9,056

White3

Civilian noninstitutional
population1.................. 178,111 179,783 180,450 180,580 180,460 180,599 180,728 180,873 181,021 181,184 181,341
181,512 181,696 181,871 18,203
Civilian labor force......... 119,399 120,150 120,345 120,093 120,084 120,166 120,200 120,575
120,420 120,881 120,623 120,669 120,307 120,722 121,162
Participation rate......
67.0
66.8
66.7
66.5
66.5
66.5
66.5
66.7
66.5
66.7
66.5
66.5
66.2
66.4
66.6
Employed................. 114,430 114,013 114,128 113,910 113,995 114,135 114,089 114,286
113,882 114,203 114,044 114,141 113,934 114,567 11,488
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2.........
64.2
63.4
63.2
63.1
63.2
63.2
63.1
63.2
62.9
63.0
62.9
62.9
62.7
63.0
63.1
Unemployed.............. 4,969
6,137
6,218
6,184
6,089
6,031
6,111
6,289
6,539
6,678
6,580
6,528
6,373
6,155
6,280
Unemployment rate...
4.2
5.1
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.3
5.1
5.2
Not inthe laborforce..... 58,713 59,633 60,104 60,487 60,376 60,432 60,528 60,298
60,601 60,303 60,717 60,843 61,389 61,149 60,870
Black or African American3

Civilian noninstitutional
population1.................. 25,138
Civilian labor force......... 16,421
Participation rate......
65.3
Employed................. 15,006
Employment-pop­
ulation ratio2.........
59.7
Unemployed..............
1,416
Unemployment rate....
8.6
Not inthe labor force.....
8,717
See footnotes at end of table.

70

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

25,578
16,565
64.8
14,872

25,751
16,540
64.2
14,754

25,784
16,706
64.8
14,827

25,484
16,374
64.3
14,684

25,519
16,395
64.2
14,669

25,552
16,296
63.8
14,641

25,587
16,521
64.6
14,723

25,624
16,618
64.9
14,819

25,664
16,717
65.1
14,746

25,702
16,540
64.4
14,697

25,742
16,579
64.4
14,769

25,784
16,724
64.9
14,835

25,825
16,572
64.2
14,658

25,860
16,514
63.9
14,823

58.1
1,693
10.2
9,013

57.3
1,786
10.8
9,211

57.5
1,879
11.2
9,078

57.6
1,690
10.3
9,110

57.5
1,726
10.5
9,124

57.3
1,655
10.2
9,256

57.5
1,797
10.9
9,066

57.8
1,799
10.8
9,007

57.5
1,971
11.8
8,947

57.2
1,842
11.1
9,162

57.4
1,810
10.9
9,163

57.6
1,871
11.2
9,060

56.8
1,913
11.5
9,254

57.3
1,691
10.2
9,347

January 2004

4. Continued—Employment status of the population, by sex, age, race, and Hispanic origin, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[Numbers in thousands]

2001

2003

2002

Annual average
Employment status

2002

Nov

Dec.

Jan.

Feb

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

25,963
17,943
69.1
16,590

26,355
18,169
68.9
16,755

26,436
18,134

28
18,658
68.9
17,223

27,191
18,614
68.5
17,215

27,291
18,836
69.0
17,428

27,391
18,811
68.7
17,264

27,494
18,856
17,271

27,597
18,750
67.9
17,206

27,701
18,829

16,708

26,994
18,614
69.0
17,155

17,370

27,808
18,859
67.8
17,448

27,913
18,915
67.8
17,546

28,016
19,168
68.4
17,746

63.9
1,353
7.5
8,029

63.6
1,414
7.8
8,188

63.2
1,425
7.9
8,303

63.5
1,459
7.8
8,380

63.6
1,436
7.7
8,436

63.3
1,399
7.5
8,577

63.9
1,408
7.5
8,455

63.0
1,548
8.2
8,580

62.8
1,586
8.4
8,638

62.3
1,544
8.2
8,847

62.7
1,460
7.8
8,872

62.7
1,411
7.5
8,949

62.9
1,369
7.2
8,998

63.3
1,422
7.4
8,847

Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity

Civilian noninstitutional
24,942
Dooulation1............
17,328
Civilian laborforce...
69.5
Participation rate.
16,190
Employed...........
Employment-pop­
64.9
ulation ratio2.........
1,138
Unemployed..............
6.6
Unemployment rate....
Not inthe labor force....... 7,614

68.6

68.6

68.0

NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (white and black or African American) do not sum to
1 The population figures are not seasonally adjusted.
totals because data are not presented for all races. In addition, persons whose ethnicity is
2 Civilian employment as a percent of the civilian noninstitutional population.
identifiedas Hispanic or Latino may be of any race and, therefore, are classified by ethnicity as well
3 Beginning in 2003, persons who selected this race group only; persons who selected as by race. Beginning in January 2003, data reflect revised population controls used in the
more than one race group are not included. Prior to 2003, persons who reported more
household survey.
than one race were included inthe groupthey identifiedas the main race.

5. Selected employment indicators, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[In thousands]_______
Annual average
Selected categories

2001

2002!

2003

2002
Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Characteristic

137,628 137,625 137,573 138,014
Employed, 16 years and over.. 136,933 136,485 136,542 136,439 137,536 137,408 137,348 137,687 137,487 137,739
73,569
73,196 72,903 72,773 72,690 72,994 73,249 73,064 73,182 72,981 73,071 73,043 73,195 73,475
63,737 63,582 63,769 63,749 64,542 64,159 64,284 64,505 64,506 64,667 64,435 64,430 64,098 64,446
Married men, spouse
44,007 44,116 44,093 44,005 44,401 44,587 44,415 44,552 44,542 44,371 44,739 44,620 44,522 44,674
Marriedwomen, spouse
34,153 34,153 34,264 34,189 34,525 34,620 34,569 34,685 34,443 34,600 34,612 34,655 34,562 35,096

Nov.

13,860
73,933
64,670
45,151
35,144

Persons at work part time1

All industries:
Part time for economic
Slackworkor business
Could only find part-time
Part time for noneconomic
Nonagricultural industries:
Part time for economic
Slackworkor business
Could only find part-time

3,715

4,213

4,329

4,273

4,643

4,807

4,696

4,840

4,592

4,499

4,449

4,975

4,836

4,933

2,989

3,252

2,396

2,788

2,855

2,893

3,027

3,152

3,123

3,221

3,058

3,153

3,112

3,017

3,203

1,006

1,124

1,159

1,110

1,297

1,275

1,192

1,266

1,265

1,257

1,304

1,186

1,365

1,396

1,382

18,790

18,813

18,727

18,555

19,314

18,421

18,888

18,886

19,083

19,548

19,027

19,564

18,993

18,879

19,219

3,627

4,119

4,272

4,219

4,496

4,675

4,587

4,728

4,478

4,390

4,566

4,380

4,847

4,714

4,829

2,340

2,726

2,816

2,854

2,947

3,062

3,048

3,140

3,003

3,074

3,079

2,963

3,145

2,925

3,175

1,276

1,179

1,367

1,374

1,383

18,610

19,142

18,619

18,608

18,880

1,237
1,234
1,258
1,178
1,257
1,267
1,097
1,158
1,114
997
Part time for noneconomic
|
19,184
18,664
18,503
18,529
reasons...................... I 18,415 18,487 18,361 18,197 18,984 18,134
1 Excludes persons "witha jobbut not at work"during the survey periodforsuch reasons as vacation, illness, or industrial disputes.
NOTE: Beginning inJanuary 2003, data reflect revised population controls used inthe household survey.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

4,649

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

71

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

6. Selected unemployment indicators, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[Unemployment rates]
A nnual average

Selected categories

2001

2002

2002

2003

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

M ay

June

6.4
19.3

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Characteristic

Total, 16 years and older........
Both sexes, 16 to 19 years...
Men, 20 years and older.....
Women, 20 years and older..

4.7
14.7
4.2
4.1

5.8
16.5
5.3
5.1

5.9
16.8
5.6
5.0

6.0
16.4
5.6
5.2

5.7
16.8
5.4
4.7

5.8
17.1
5.3
5.0

5.8
17.7
5.3
5.0

6.0

6.1

18.0
5.6
5.1

18.5
5.9
5.1

White, total1.........................
Both sexes, 16 to 19 years...
Men, 16 to 19 years........
Women, 16 to 19 years....
Men, 20 years and older.....
Women, 20 years and older..

4.2
12.7
13.9
11.4
3.7
3.6

5.1
14.5
15.9
13.1
4.7
4.4

5.2
14.5
15.8
13.0
5.0
4.2

5.1
13.8
14.9
12.7
4.9
4.4

5.1
15.2
16.2
14.2
4.9
4.1

5.0
15.5
17.3
13.7
4.6
4.2

5.1
15.6
18.0
13.1
4.7
4.4

5.2
15.4
17.7
13.2
5.0
4.3

5.4
15.3
17.0
13.7
5.2
4.6

Black or African American, total1
Both sexes, 16 to 19 years...
Men, 16 to 19 years..........
Women, 16 to 19 years......
Men, 20 years and older.......
Women, 20 years and older....

8.6

10.2

29.0
30.4
27.5

10.3
30.4
33.2
28.0
10.3
8.4

10.9
33.1
37.7
29.3
10.4
9.2

10.8

37.0
43.1
32.0

8.8

11.2
33.2
34.5
32.1
10.5
9.7

10.2

7.0

10.8
30.5
30.0
31.0
10.6
9.0

10.5
30.2
38.1

8.0

29.8
31.3
28.3
9.5

6.6

7.5
3.6
3.7
5.9
5.2

7.8
3.6
3.8
6.1
5.1

7.9
3.7
3.8
6.1
5.3

8.2

3.9
3.7
6.3
5.6

8.4
4.4
3.9
6.5
5.9

3.9
3.9
6.3
5.5

5.3
4.5
2.9

9.0
5.3
4.8
2.9 I

9.0
5.3
5.0
2.9

9.2
5.5
4.8
3.1

9.7
5.8
4.9
3.1

8.7
5.4
5.0
3.1

Hispanic or Latino ethnicity........
Married men, spouse present.....
Married women, spouse present..
Full-time workers.....................
Part-time workers....................

2.7
3.1
4.7
5.1

9.0

33.4
45.2
23.1
9.3
8.7

7.8
3.5
3.3
5.8
5.4

7.7
3.6
3.6
5.9
5.5

7.5
3.8
3.7
5.9
5.5

8.5
5.1
4.8
3.0

5.4
4.7
3.0

8.5
5.5
4.8
3.1

22.2

10.1

7.5
3.7
3.6
6.1

5.4

Educational attainment2

Less than a high school diploma...
High school graduates, no college3.
Some college or associate degree.,
Bachelor's degree and higher4......

7.2
4.2
3.3
2.3

8.2

5.7
4.7
3.1

11.2
8.0
8.2

6.2

6.1

6.1

6.0

5.2

18.4
5.9
5.2

16.6
5.8
5.2

17.5
5.7
5.3

17.1
5.6
5.2

5.5
16.5
17.8
15.2
5.4
4.4

5.5
15.8
18.2
13.4
5.4
4.4

5.4
15.0
16.0
14.0
5.3
4.4

5.3
15.2
17.9
12.4
4.9
4.6

5.1
14.2
15.8
12.5
4.8
4.4

11.8

11.1

39.3
36.5
41.7
11.3
9.7

10.9
30.0
27.4
32.4
10.4
9.7

11.2

36.0
37.7
34.5

32.8
34.2
31.6
11.2

11.5
37.2
40.5
33.6
10.5

9.1

10.0

8.9

7.8
3.8
3.8

7.5
3.7
4.0

7.2
3.8
3.7

7.4
3.7
3.8

6.2

6.2

6.1

6.1

5.3

5.8

5.5

5.0

9.4
5.4
4.7
3.1

8.6

5.3
4.8
3.2

8.9
5.5
4.8
3.0

8.5
5.4
4.8
3.1

6.1

10.2

9.7

5.9
15.5
5.7
5.1
5.2
14.1
16.9
11.1

5.0
4.4
10.2

28.2
32.4
24.6
10.0

Includes high school diploma or equivalent.
Includes persons with bachelor's, master's, professional, and doctoral degrees.

selected more than one race group are not included. Prior to 2003, persons who
reported more than one race were included in the group they identified as the
main race.
2 Data refer to persons 25 years and older.

NOTE: Beginning in January 2003, data reflect revised population controls used in the
household survey.

7. Duration of unemployment, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[Numbers in thousands]_________
Weeks of
unemployment

Annual average
2001

2002

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

2,912
2,532
3,143
1,317
1,826

2,860
2,547
3,296
1,392
1,904

2,772
2,577
3,140
1,457
1,683

2,749
2,565
3,155
1,281
1,874

2,780
2,473
3,104
1,316
1,788

2,814
2,630
3,294
1,392
1,903

3,056
2,605
3,250
1,321
1,930

3,009
2,936
3,572
1,536
2,036

3,009
2,699
3,592
1,633
1,959

2,727
2,595
3,572
1,637
1,935

2,739
2,783
3,524
1,421
2,102

2,731
2,577
3,463
1,444
2,020

2,595
2,548
3,479
1,440
2,039

13.1
16.6
17.9
18.4
18.4
18.6
18.0
6.8
9.1
9.4
9.6
9.8
9.4
9.6
Beginning inJanuary 2003, data reflect revised population controls used inthe household survey.

19.6
10.2

19.2
10.1

19.8
12.3

19.3
10.0

19.0
9.6

19.7
10.1

19.1
10.3

20.1
10.4

2,853
2,196
1,752
951
801

2,893
2,580
2,904
1,369
1,535

Mean duration, inweeks........
Median duration, inweeks........

72

2003

Dec.

Less than 5 weeks...........
5 to 14 weeks................
15 weeks and over.................
15 to 26 weeks...............
27 weeks and over...............

Note :

2C02
Nov.

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

Nov.

8. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[Numbers in thousands]______ ____________ __________________
Reason for
unem ploym ent

2002

2001

4,607
1,124
3,483
866
2,368
536

3,476
1,067
2,409
835
2,031
459

_________________ ___________________
2003

2002

A nnual average

July

June

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

4,833
1,069
3,764
834
2,394
586

4,863
1,110
3,753
862
2,462
534

4,583
1,080
3,503
825
2,331
616

4,756
1,142
3,614
772
2,395
579

4,613
1,157
3,456
794
2,391
626

4,765
1,101
3,664
829
2,558
642

5,074
1,226
3,848
772
2,499
634

5,010
1,199
3,811
893
2,687
648

Aug.

4,951
1,198
3,753
792
2,529
670

Sept.

5,014
1,108
3,905
847
2,408
700

4,942
1,080
3,852
847
2,540
628

Oct.

4,936
1,097
3,838
783
2,544
655

Nov.

4,701
1,040
3,661
939
2,433
601

Percent of unemployed
51.1
15.7
35.4
12.3
29.9
6.8

55.0
13.4
41.6
10.3
28.3
6.4

55.9
12.4
43.5
9.6
27.7
6.8

55.8
12.7
43.0
9.9
28.2
6.1

54.9
12.9
41.9
9.9
27.9
7.4

55.9
13.4
42.5
9.1
28.2
6.8

54.8
13.7
41.0
9.4
28.4
7.4

54.2
12.5
41.7
9.4
29.1
7.3

56.5
13.7
42.9
8.6
27.8
7.1

54.2
13.0
41.3
9.7
29.1
7.0

55.4
13.4
42.0
8.9
28.3
7.5

55.6
12.1
43.4
8.8
28.6
7.1

55.9
12.4
43.5
9.4
26.9
7.8

55.3
12.3
43.0
8.8
28.5
7.3

54.2
12.0
42.2
10.8
28.1
6.9

3.2
.6
1.6
.4

3.3
.6
1.6
.4

3.4
.6
1.7
.4

3.1
.6
1.6
.4

3.3
.5
1.6
.4

3.2
.5
1.6
.4

3.3
.6
1.7
.4

3.5
.5
1.7
.4

3.4
.6
1.8
.4

3.4
.5
1.7
.5

3.4
.5
1.7
.4

3.4
.6
1.6
.5

3.4
.5
1.7
.4

3.2
.6
1.7
.4

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Percent of civilian
labor force
2.4
.6
1.4
.3
1 Includes persons who completed temporary jobs

NOTE: Beginning in January 2003, data reflect revised population controls used in the household survey.

9. Unemployment rates by sex and age, monthly data seasonally adjusted
Annual average
Sex and age
2001

16 to 19 years.....................
16 to 17 years..................
18 to 19 years..................
20 to 24 years.....................
25 years and older..................
25 to 54 years..................

55 years and older1.........

4.7
10.6
14.7
17.2
13.1
8.3
3.7
3.8
3.0
4.8
11.4
16.0
19.1
14.0
9.0
3.6
3.7
3.2
4.7
9.6
13.4
15.2
12.2
7.5
3.7
3.9
2.7

2002

5.8
12.0
16.5
18.8
15.1
9.7
4.6
4.8
3.8
5.9
12.8
18.1
21.1
16.4
10.2
4.7
4.8
4.1
5.6
11.1
14.9
16.6
13.8
9.1
4.6
4.8
3.6

2003

2002
Nov.

5.9
12.2
16.8
19.4
15.3
9.8
4.8
5.1
3.7
6.2
12.8
18.0
21.2
16.1
10.2
5.1
5.3
4.0
5.6
11.5
15.6
17.4
14.4
9.4
4.5
4.8
3.2

Dec.

6.0
11.9
16.4
17.6
15.5
9.7
4.8
5.0
4.2
6.2
12.6
17.5
18.5
16.7
10.2
5.0
5.2
4.4
5.8
11.3
15.2
16.6
14.2
9.3
4.6
4.8
3.8

Jan.

5.7
11.8
16.8
18.3
15.9
9.3
4.6
4.7
4.1
6.0
12.4
18.2
19.3
17.6
9.7
4.9
5.0
4.4
5.3
11.1
15.5
17.3
14.1
8.8
4.2
4.4
4.1

Feb.

5.8
11.9
17.1
17.9
15.9
9.3
4.7
4.9
3.8
6.0
12.5
19.5
19.1
19.3
9.2
4.9
5.0
4.2
5.6
11.3
14.8
16.8
12.3
9.5
4.5
4.8
3.3

Mar.

5.8
11.7
17.7
16.7
17.7
8.9
4.7
5.0
3.8
6.0
12.4
20.8
18.0
21.5
8.7
4.9
5.0
4.3
5.5
11.0
14.6
15.5
13.7
9.1
4.6
4.9
3.3

6.0
12.7
18.0
18.7
17.8
10.1
4.9
4.9
4.2
6.3
13.8
20.6
21.4
20.1
10.7
5.1
5.2
4.6
5.6
11.5
15.5
16.2
15.5
9.3
4.7
4.7
3.4

6.1
13.1
18.5
18.5
19.0
10.5
4.9
5.0
4.5
6.5
14.3
20.8
21.5
20.9
11.4
5.2
5.3
4.8
5.7
11.8
16.2
15.8
17.1
9.4
4.6
4.7
3.6

6.4
13.5
19.3
21.6
17.9
10.7
5.1
5.3
4.6
6.8
14.3
20.1
23.8
17.7
11.7
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.9
12.5
18.5
19.5
18.0
9.5
4.7
5.0
3.7

6.2
13.0
18.4
20.8
17.1
10.3
5.0
5.1
4.3
6.6
14.5
20.9
22.8
19.5
11.7
5.2
5.3
4.6
5.7
11.3
16.0
18.9
14.5
8.9
4.7
4.9
4.2

6.1
12.3
16.6
18.7
15.9
10.3
5.0
5.1
4.1
6.4
12.7
16.9
20.7
15.3
10.8
5.3
5.5
4.4
5.8
12.0
16.4
16.7
16.6
9.8
4.6
4.7
4.5

6.1
13.0
17.5
19.4
16.1
10.9
4.9
5.1
3.9
6.4
14.4
20.0
22.6
18.3
11.9
5.0
5.2
4.2
5.8
11.5
15.1
16.3
13.7
9.7
4.8
5.0
3.8

Oct.

6.0
12.3
17.1
20.9
14.9
10.0
4.9
5.1
3.7
6.2
13.2
18.7
20.3
17.8
10.7
5.0
5.3
3.9
5.7
11.3
15.4
21.5
12.0
9.2
4.7
5.0
3.4

Nov.

5.9
12.1
15.5
16.9
14.6
10.5
4.8
5.0
3.9
6.3
13.4
18.2
17.9
18.3
11.2
5.0
5.2
4.1
5.5
10.7
12.7
15.9
10.8
9.7
4.5
4.8
3.5

1Data are not seasonally adjusted.
NOTE: Beginning inJanuary 2003, data reflect revised population controls used inthe household survey.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

73

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

10. Unemployment rates by State, seasonally adjusted
State

Oct.

Sept.

Oct.

2002

2003p

2003p

State

Oct.

Sept.

Oct.

2002

2003p

2003p

AlabamaAlaska....
ArizonaArkansas..
California-

5.9
8.2
6.1
5.5
6.8

5.5
7.8
5.6
6.0
6.5

5.6
7.3
5.0
6.2
6.7

Missouri
Montana..........................
Nebraska.......................
Nevada............................
New Hampshire.......................

5,n

Colorado..............
Connecticut...........
Delaware..............
District of ColumbiaFlorida..................

5.8
4.5
4.3
6.4
5.3

5.6
5.0
4.5
6.1
5.3

5.4
4.9
4.0
6.8
4.9

New Jersey......................
New Mexico.....................
New York..........................
North Carolina..........................
North Dakota..........................

GeorgiaHawaii—
Idaho....
Illinois...
Indiana...

5.3
3.9
5.8
6.8
5.0

4.4
4.2
5.4
7.1
5.2

4.2
4.2
5.3
6.7
5.1

Ohio.............................
Oklahoma........................
Oregon.............................
Pennsylvania........................
Rhode Island.........................

fi fi
4.5
7.2
5.7
5.4

Iowa..............
Kansas...........
Kentucky........
Louisiana........
Maine.............

4.2
5.2
5.4
6.1
4.5

4.6
4.8
5.9
5.5
5.0

4.5
4.7
5.6
5.5
5.1

South Carolina..............................
South Dakota........................
Tennessee........................
Texas..................................
Utah...................................

Maryland........
Massachusetts..
Michigan........
Minnesota.......
Mississippi.......

4.2
5.5
6.1
4.3
7.0

4.2
5.7
7.5
4.6
5.4

4.1
5.6
7.6
4.6
5.7

Vermont...........................
Virginia...............................
Washington........................
West Virginia...........................
Wisconsin............................
Wyoming................................

5.5
4.6
3.5

5.5
4.9
4.0

5.3
4.2
3.8

6.0

5.8

5.7

fi 2
fi fi
4.3

3.7

3.6

5.1
8.0
5.3
4.5

5.4
7.6
5.4
4.4

6.0
2.9
5.0
6.5
6.1

6.4
3.5
5.4
6.6
5.1

7.1
3.2
5.6
6.5
4.7

3.7
3.9
7.1
6.2
5.5
4.2

4.3
3.7
7.6
5.8
5.7
4.0

4.0
3.5
7.0
5.9
5.4
3.9

p= preliminary

11. Employment of workers on nonfarm payrolls by State, seasonally adjusted
[In thousands]______________
State

Oct.

Sept.

Oct.

2002

2003p

2003p

2,148,526
347,645
2,668,293
1,311,454
17,588,557

2 165 956
346 217
? 664 663
1 313 926
17 722 189

Alabama.............................. 2,098,994
Alaska..................................
325,361
Arizona.............................
2,686,413
Arkansas............................
1,298,272
California............................... 17,473,859

State

Oct.

Sept.

Oct.

2002

2003p

2003p

3,001,449
478,324
990,989
1,107,520
719,652

4Go,931

Colorado...............................
Connecticut...........................
Delaware.............................
District of Columbia.................
Florida.................................

2,446,938 2,481,887 ? 477 63?
1,781,252 1,778 137 1 780 764
421,270
421,703
424 221
301,827
314 665
310,752
8,088,704 8,111,562 8 085 765

9,428,373

Georgia................................
Hawaii..................................
Idaho...................................
Illinois...........................
Indiana.................................

4,313,591 4,400,383 4 394 966
581,858
608 389
607,758
682,620
688 710
686,282
6,369,735 6,449,085 6 479 755
3,187,648 3,205 153 3 203 213

o,8Go,019 5,853,450
1,714,264 1,/09,561
1,824,786
6,305,119
6,184,087
oG8,3o4
567,343

Iowa..................................... 1,678,418 1,621 539
Kansas.................................. 1,424,222 1,480 255
Kentucky.............................. 1,959,530 1,998,651
Louisiana.............................. 1,993,639 2,047,050
Maine.............................
687,149
700,687

1 644 585
1 479 107
1,993,835
2,046 432
696,470

Maryland.............................
Massachusetts........................
Michigan................................
Minnesota.......................
Mississippi.............................

2 921 352
3,458 091
5,146 954
2 933 368
1,325,115

2,903,613
3,508,377
4,975,050
2,919,160
1,300,054

2,918,238
3,456,467
5,113,567
2,925,954
1,316,202

4,382,270

4,436,700
897,483
9,389,708
4,185,074 4,184,045
353,982
355,488

2,905,241
1,182,177

Wyoming.............................

269,451

Note: Some data in this table may differ fromdata published elsewhere because of the continual updating of the data base.

74

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

11,047,526
1,221,644
353,602

p= preliminary.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2,040,484
423,909

3,120,113
803,009
3,108,005
276,607
276,766

12. Employment of workers on nonform payrolls by industry, monthly data seasonally adjusted

[In thousands]
Industry

Annual average
2001

TOTAL NONFARM.............
TOTAL PRIVATE....................
GOODS-PRODUCING.................
Natural resources and
mining.....................................

2002

573
581
606
67.6
69.1
73.5
505.0
511.9
532.5
122.0
123.7
122.5
209.3
212.1
218.7
73.8
74.9
74.3
173.7
177.2
190.1
6,732
6,745
6,826
Construction............................
Construction of buildings...... 1,588.9 1,583.9 1,602.9
915.2
929.9
953.0
Heavy and civil engineering....
Speciality trade contractors... 4,283.9 4,217.9 4,226.4
16,441 15,306 15,091
Manufacturing..........................
Production workers.......... 11,677 10,799 10,648
9,362
9,517
10,335
Durable goods.......................
6,447
6 551
7,163
Production workers..........
556.8
552.3
574.1
Wood products..................
513.6
519.0
544.5
Nonmetallic mineral products
503.3
510.9
570.9
Primary metals...................
1,523.7
1,547.8
1,676.4
Fabricated metal products.....
Machinery........................ 1,368.3 1,237.4 1,216.1
Computer and electronic
products1...................... 1,748.8 1,521.3 1,477.0
Computer and peripheral
241.8
286.2
249.8
equipment.....................
182.0
190.9
233.9
Communications equipment..
Semiconductors and
507.6
645.4
531.4
electronic components......
442.5
450.6
475.1
Electronic instruments........
Electrical equipment and
486.8
498.9
556.9
appliances......................
Transportation equipment..... 1,937.9 1,628.5 1,808.7
Furniture and related
594.2
642.4
604.6
products........................
691.1
714.5
691.9
Miscellaneous manufacturing
5,729
6,107
5,789
Nondurable goods.................
4,249
4,201
4,514
Production workers..........
Food manufacturing............ 1,551.2 1,525.1 1,520.0
Beverages andtobacco
200.2
205.4
209.0
products........................
286.8
293.2
332.9
Textile mills......................
194.9
196.2
205.7
Textile product mills............
343.2
357.6
426.5
47.7
49.9
58.0
Leather and allied products...
544.6
549.8
577.6
Paper and paper products....
Printing and related support
697.5
768.4
709.'
119.4
119.1
121.1
Petroleumandcoal products..
924.7
329.5
959.0
850.1
897.4
353.5
Plastics and rubber products..
107,952 107,757 108,000
SERVICE-PROVIDING...............

Durable goods..................
Nondurable goods.............
Electronic markets and
agents and brokers..........
Retail trade............................

Motor vehicles and parts

Automobile dealers..........
Furniture and home
furnishings stores............
Electronics and appliance
stores...........................

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

131,826 130,376 130,409 130,198 130,356 130,235 130,084 130,062 129,986 129,903 129,846 129,881 129,980 130,117 130,174
110,707 108,386 108,869 108,642 108,780 108,647 108,537 108,536 108,502 108,427 108,388 108,411 108,524 108,636 108,686
23,873 22,319 22,409 22,323 22,288 22,191 22,159 22,119 22,098 22,061 22,001 21,982 21,978 21,970 21,963

Logging..........................
Mining..............................
Oil amd gas extraction.........
Minina, except oil and qas1....
Coal mininq....................
Support activities for mining....

PRIVATE SERVICEPROVIDING..........................
Trade, transportation,

2003

2002
Nov.

566
64.0
502.1
125.3
209.6
73.7
167.2
6,804
1,606.7
910.8
4,286.3
14,631
10,257
9,034
6,188
540.8
501.1
478.5
1,470.7
1,171.9

565
63.6
501.1
125.0
209.1
72.9
167.0
6,825
1,610.9
913.9
4,300.3
14,592
10,229
9,018
6,182
538.2
501.4
475.9
1,469.2
1,168.0

564
63.7
499.9
125.4
207.5
71.5
167.0
6,841
1,620.1
915.8
4,305.5
14,573
10,207
9,010
6,169
542.1
500.3
472.4
1,469.8
1,168.1

565
64.5
500.0
125.8
207.6
71.6
166.6
6,846
1,621.2
912.8
4,311.7
14,559
10,191
9,000
6,162
544.6
499.9
469.7
1,467.4
1,167.3

565
64.7
499.8
125.8
207.6
71.7
166.4
6,856
1,619.2
916.2
4,320.1
14,542
10,175
9,006
6,161
548.1
500.3
467.8
1,468.3
1,168.8

568
67.1
500.5
122.1
206.9
72.2
171.5
6,738
1,597.7
916.8
4,223.8
14,982
10,564
9,282
6,392
549.2
507.9
500.1
1,508.0
1,206.5

564
565
569
64.3
64.6
66.6
500.4
499.8
502.1
124.4
122.9
121.8
207.5
206.9
206.3
72.7
72.3
72.3
167.9
170.6
174.0
6,760
6,720
6,700
1,594.4 1,605.6 1,615.8
898.4
895.0
912.5
4,193.2 4,219.5 4,245.5
14,922 14,874 14,795
10,516 10,447 10,379
9,147
9,203
9,236
6,267
6,314
6,355
544.4
546.0
548.5
504.8
506.7
505.9
494.7
491.1
496.5
1,497.5 1,495.3 1,489.4
1,201.6 1,194.8 1,187.4

1,462.2

1,448.5

1,438.2

241.0
180.1

234.4
177.6

230.9
177.8

1,423.6 1,413.0 1,407.7 1,398.1 1,392.5 1,389.5 1,384.7 1,382.9
230.5 226.7 226.5 223.6 221.9 221.6 219.3 217.7
229.8
170.4 170.7
170.5
175.5 174.4 173.3 171.9 170.9
176.5

503.7
441.3

498.8
441.4

496.0
438.7

494.1
436.5

482.4
485.2
1,804.7 1,806.5

479.8
1,800.7

477.5
1,792.5

460.8 460.9
461.1
474.8 469.3 467.7 465.9 462.1
1,771.9 1,777.6 1,774.3 1,760.2 1,767.6 1,768.1 1,768.5 1,765.8

587.0
589.1
686.0
687.9
5,700
5,704
4,172
4,178
1,518.5 1,517.1

582.9
684.5
5,686
4,161
1,514.7

582.0
683.0
5,671
4,133
1,513.3

574.2 572.7 573.7 574.6 576.0
576.4 576.4 574.1
667.1
682.0 677.8 676.6 673.0 670.4 668.8 668.1
5,597 5,574 5,563 5,553 55,336
5,648 5,632 5,611
4,112 4,098 4,078 4,069 4,047 4,038 4,029 4,014
1,512.3 1,512.4 1,517.5 1,520.9 1,521.7 1,522.7 1,523.7 1,515.9

199.0
285.2
191.7
331.8
46.7
539.7

198.2
283.7
192.6
325.9
46.0
538.5

196.1
281.6
192.6
322.1
45.8
535.1

200.2
284.9
193.7
337.2
47.3
541.5

566
64.8
501.4
125.2
208.2
72.6
168.0
6,786
1,615.0
902.8
4,267.8
14,746
10,342
9,114
6,244
544.9
505.1
486.4
1,482.3
1,181.2

569
65.7
502.8
125.7
208.9
73.2
168.2
6,800
1,609.7
905.8
4,284.1
14,692
10,299
9,081
6,221
541.0
505.0
482.0
1476. 4
1,175.8

572
67.9
503.6
121.6
208.1
73.3
173.9
6,731
1,595.3
915.3
4,220.7
15,020
10,595
9,316
6,417
548.1
510.8
499.7
1,516.0
1,212.4

1,432.1

492.0
433.5

194.6
277.8
190.6
318.4
44.8
534.1

487.7
431.5

195.4
272.7
188.7
313.2
44.4
531.9

485.1
429.9

194.5
270.1
186.4
307.8
43.3
530.6

480.9
429.0

194.4
264.7
184.2
301.2
43.5
527.3

479.5
429.0

194.8
259.6
178.4
299.0
43.1
526.4

477.6
429.3

193.3
258.3
179.7
296.5
43.1
525.0

474.6
429.6

193.3
255.6
179.3
297.0
42.7
524.5

475.4
429.7

192.1
253.8
179.4
297.9
42.6
522.5

687.7 685.3 683.8
692.2 690.0
696.4
694.8 695.3 694.1
694.0
694.5
689.6
115.4
114.8
116.0
116.9
119.2
119.3 118.4 118.0
120.4
120.3
120.4
119.7
909.8 907.9
921.7 920.6 916.5 917.7 914.8 912.5
922.5
924.2
926.0
925.6
826.5 824.9
839.2 837.7 831.7 833.3 829.3 828.6
847.4
845.1
845.4
848.0
107,875 108,068 108,044 107,925 107,943 107,888 107,842 107,845 107,899 108,002 108,147 108,211
86,319

86,834

86,267

86,460

25,98;
5,772.7
3,130.4
2,031.2

25,493
5,641 .C
3,007.2
2,015.1

25,406 25,37!
5,604.9 5,603.9
2,984.3 2,978.7
2,004.3 2,009.6

86,492

86,456

86,378

86,417

86,404

86,366

86,387

25,376 25,346 25,338 25,321 25,282 25,238 25,211
5,596.0 5,596.2 5,594.0 5,590.8 5.582.C 5,570.6 55,601.C
2,967.9 2,967.0 2,961.2 2,957.7 2,952.2 2,947.6 2,940.4
2,011.5 2,010.7 2,013.6 2,013.2 2,009.2 2,004.1 2,001.4

86,429

86,548

86,668

86,723

25,217 25,240 25,278 25,258
5,550.0 5,551.2 5.552.C 5,557.5
2,934.5 2,932.7 2,936.-1 2,945.8
1,997.7 1,995-S 1,993.4 1,989.6

622.1
622.2
622.8
619.C 618.C 617.8
619.2
619.6
619.2
618.5
616.6
615.6
616.C
618.6
611.1
15,238.6 15 047.2 15.014.C 15,005.6 15,009.2 14,987.3 14,994.7 14,999.6 14.979.CI 14,964.; 14.958.C 14,975.1 14,986.' 15,014.' 14,987.0
1,884.4
1,854.£ 1 879.2 1,883.6 1,878.6 1,876.8 1,874.' 1,875.5 1,875.-: 1,879.; 1,877.' 1,883.; 1,880.5 1,884.8 1,8841,225.1 1,250.- 1,255.6 1,249.6 1,245.5 1,242.1 1,241.5 1,242.6 1,244.6 1.246.C 1.249.C 1,248.1 1,249.8 1,248.2 1,245.5
541.2

539.5

548.'

548.-

549.9

552.C

547.e

549.6

545.-

546.!

543.S

541.5

544.

544.'

548.6

554.'

528.!

529.5

529.!

531.6

526.5

524.!

525.;

523.!

522.'

519.«

519.'

520.-

521.-

523.7

See notes at end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

75

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

12. Continued—Employment of workers on nonfarm payrolls by industry, monthly data seasonally adjusted

[In thousands]

_________

Industry

Annual average
2001

2002

2002
Nov.

2003
Dec.

Jan.

Building material and garden
supply stores.................. 1,151
1,179. 1,184.5
1,190.€
Food and beverage stores... . 2,950.£ 2,871,t 2,842.£ 2,833.£ 2.827.C
Health and personal care
951.£
946.É
949.£
956.8
Gasoline stations..............
925
903.£
903.7
904.2
905.2
Clothing and clothing
accessories stores..........
1 321
1.307.E 1,304.5 1,308.5 1,291.2
Sporting goods, hobby,
book, and music stores.....
679.2
660.1
650.1
637.8
653.5
General merchandise storesl 2,842.2 2.820.7 2,817.5 2,827.6 2,834.2
Department stores...........
1,768 3 1.709.8 1,712.0 1,727.5 1,720.9
Miscellaneous store retailers..
993.3
962.5
957.2
954.6
952.4
Nonstore retailers..............
473.5
447.3
443.0
445.9
440.0

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

1,183.8
2,820.2

1,181.6
2,822.6

1.189.C 1.188.5 1,194.2
2.822.C 2.822.5 2,812.5

960.1
905.C

962.5
907.1

966.2
910.9

965.7
908.8

967.S
908.5

1,279.7

1,282.8

1,288.3

1,280.7

1,277.5

652.8
2,838.6
1,718.5
949.1
444.r

650.8
646.3
645.2
642.0
640.5
2,846.4 2,835.8 2,833.1 2,831.5 2.838.S
1,710.6 1,695.5 1,690.3 1,689.9 1,690.3
949.8
944.1
948.6
941.8
942.5
442.6
442.7
442.0
440.6
443.5

Transportation and

May

June

July

Aug.

1,196.5
2,801.'

1,203.3 1.210.C 1,212.3
2.798.C 2,796.7 2,812.7

965.5
904.C
1,277.5

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

1,213.8
2,790.0

965.5
907.1

969.4
903.9

975.2
900.C

978.9
901.4

1,278.9

1,278.2

1,284.4

1,279.9

640.6
640.3
639.9
2,857.7 2,859.1 2,858.2
1,703.6 1,704.1 1,704.2
941.0
941.0
942.2
440.6
439.2
439.0

638.8
2,849.5
1,702.2
939.6
439.4

4,205.3 4,188.9 4,170.7 4.174.6 4,166.7 4,153.8 4,136.3 4,128.5 4,113.9 4,103.7 4,101.2 4,114.1
4,117.7 4,122.6
615.3
559.3
556.3
553.9
551.3
545.8
537.3
525.6
516.4
510.0
502.4
500.0
501.4
499.2
502.1
226 7
218.1
216.8
216.3
215.7
215.3
215.3
216.5
216.1
217.2
217.1
214.8
216.8
216.5
216.4
54.0
51.6
50.3
50.3
50.6
50.5
50.1
49.9
50.3
50.1
50.0
49.9
48.6
49.2
49.0
1,386.8 1,339.1 1,333.2 1,331.9 1.327.6 1,324.3 1,328.1 1,324.4 1,324.4 1,326.9 1,324.0
1,331.0 1,330.1 1,332.6 1,334.4
374.8
371.5
363.3
360.8
358.0
357.5
351.9
353.0
350.4
345.4
347.4
348.3
355.3
358.6
358.8
45.4
41.5
40.2
40.2
40.0
39.8
40.2
40.3
40.3
39.7
39.5
38.9
39.1
39.1
39.4
29.1
25.9
25.7
25.6
°4 0
25.6
27.1
28.5
29.1
29.9
29.5
30.0
29.7
29.7
29.8
539.2
526.7
528.2
531.2
527.9
525.9
522.7
527.8
523.2
520.2
519.1
521
8
587.0
558.0
556.3
545.0
561.4
558.9
563.3
561.6
560.8
560.9
560.6
557 8
557.8
555.5
513.8
513.6
518.6
515.5
518.3
521.1
514.6
513.8
512.9
510.6
513.0
511.4
514.0
515.6
515.5
Utilities................................
599.4
599.8
598.3
597.3
596.4
595.9
59b.li
594.6
592.3
589.5
589.6
590.8
591.0
591.6
591.1
Information.............................
3,629
3,420
3,353
3,328
3,308
3,305
3,303
3,294
3,285
3,278
3,267
3,270
3,264
3,265
Publishing industries, except
Internet......................
1,020.7
969.4
962.6
954.0
955.3
953.5
950.8
947.2
945.1
941.4
941.5
939.2
937.9
937.5
Motion picture and sound
376.8
387.1
394.3
381.6
377.8
367.0
369.3
371.1
373.4
371.7
373.7
367.2
373.3
372.3
374.7
Broadcasting, except Internet..
344.6
333.8
331.0
332.1
327.2
325.0
325.7
325.0
324.4
324.2
324.1
322.9
325.0
322.9
322.9
Internet publishing and
broadcasting....................
45.5
34.8
33.0
32.9
33.3
33.6
33.8
33.5
34.0
34.5
34.2
34.3
34.2
34.6
1,302.1 1,200.9 1,174.9 1,162.5 1,158.7 1,151.4 1,146.9 1,145.0 1,138.1 1,132.5 1,127.8
1,125.7 1,125.0 1,123.2 1,122.4
ISPs, search portals, and
data processing................
493.6
447.4
439.1
435.8
430.3
429.5
430.4
431.3
431.4
432.1
430.9
429.7
427.4
427.4
426.6
Other information services....
46.1
46.6
46.9
45.8
46.5
46.3
46.0
46.0
45.5
45.1
45.1
45.5
45.7
45.8
45.8
Financial activities.................
7,807
7,843
7,880
7,889
7,902
7,916
7,930
7,956
7,971
7,972
7,981
7,980
7,986
7,974
7,969
5,773.1 5,814.9 5,851.1 5,861.0 5,872.4 5,885.2 5,894.8 5,912.0 5,923.2 5,923.3 5,928.6 5,924.4
5,933.2 5,919.6 5,912.8
Monetary authorities—
central bank..................
23.0
23.1
23.0
22.7
22.3
22.3
22.2
22.2
22.1
22.1
22.0
22.0
21.9
21.9
Credit intermediation and
related activities1............. 2,597.7 2,682.3 2,722.8 2,729.1 2,734.9 2,741.9 2,752.3 2,765.8 2,781.8 2,783.5 2,789.4 2,788.8 2,791.3
2,783.9 2,274.9
Depository credit
intermediation1............
1,701.2 1,738.2 1,748.3 1,751.3 1.755.1 1,757.1 1.762.3 1,764.4 1,767.9 1,768.5 1,771.5 1,772.4 1,773.8
1,775.1 1,773.7
Commercial banking......... 1,258.4 1,284.7 1,291.2 1,292.8 1.296.1 1,297.5 1.300.4 1,300.6 1,302.4 1,302.3 1,304.1
1,304.8 1,304.1 1,304.1 1,301.9
Securities, commodity
830.5
800.8
798.2
799.4
802.3
803.1
799.3
798.8
796.9
796.7
796.6
794.9
799.0
800.2
803.8
Insurance carriers and
related activities................ 2,233.7 2,223.1 2,222.7 2,225.7 2,228.5 2,233.9 2,236.8 2,241.8 2,239.4 2,238.9 1,138.1
2,237.1
2,238.9
2,232.4
2,230.6
Funds, trusts, and other
88.3
85.6
84.4
84.1
84.0
84.0
84.1
83.4
82.9
82.1
82.4
81.6
82.0
81.2
81.6
Real estate and rental
and leasing...................... 2,034.5 2,027.8 2,029.2
2,029.2 2,030.6 2,034.7 2,044.2 2,047.8 2,048.6 2,052.7 2,055.2 2,052.7 2,054.3 2,055.8
Real estate....................... 1,339.5 1,347.7 1,357.3
1,353.8 1,356.9 1,359.9 1,366.4 1,367.3 1,365.2 1,368.9 1,371.5 1,372.4 1,373.5 1,374.8
Rental and leasing services....
666.3
652.3
644.9
645.8
648.7
646.7
647.0
649.4
651.4
654.2
654.6
654.2
650.5
650.7
651.0
Lessors of nonfinancial
intangible assets...............
28.7
27.8
27.0
26.8
°C7
27.0
27.8
28.4
29.2
29.2
29.2
29.5
29.8
30.1
30.0
Airtransportation...............
Rail transportation..............
Watertransportation...........
Trucktransportation...........
Transit and ground passenger
transportation..............
Pipeline transportation........
Scenic and sightseeing
transportation..............
Support activities for
transportation.................
Couriers and messengers.....
Warehousing and storage

Professional and business
services..................................

16,476

16,010

16,014

15,972

16,015

16,043

15,980 15,989 16,002 16,006 16,063 16,054 16,107 16,133 16,153
6,902.2 6,715.0 6,731.9 6,716.9 6,745.3 6,790.5 6,758.4 6,742.2
6,674.9
6,657.3 6,685.4 6,698.4 6,703.9
1,091.3 1,111.8 1,120.6 1,120.2 1,119.8 1,124.1 1,125.7 1,127.5 1,125.6 1,125.2 6,661.6
1,122.8 1,121.9 1,124.9 1,128.5 1,129.3
Accounting and bookkeeping
872.2
867.1
884.3
872.6
941.2
913.5
899.3
866.0
848.9
847.9
854.3
856.1
856.2
855.5
Architectural and engineering
1,274.7 1,251.1 1,252.1
1,238.6 1,247.9| 1,246.0 1,242.91 1,241,4| 1,236.0 1,240.9 1,238.11 1,247.2 1,248.3 1,253.7
See notes at end of table.

Professional and technical
services1......................

76

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

12. Continued—Employment of workers on nonfarm payrolls by Industry, monthly data seasonally adjusted
[In thousands]
Industry

Computer systems design
and related services.........
Management and technical
consulting services..........
Management of companies
and enterprises..................
Administrative and waste
services...........................
Administrative and support
Emnlovment services’.......
Temporary help services...
Business support services....
Services to buildings
and dwellings.................
Waste management and
remediation services..........
Educational and health
services.................................

Annual average

2003

2002

2002

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

1,297.8

1,162.7

1,150.1

1,142.7

1,142.8 1,144.3 1,144.5
735.5
1,697.9

746.2

731.8

733.4

739.8

734.8

736.2

1,779.0

1,711.1

1,699.0

1,694.2

1,696.8

1,697.1

June

July

Aug

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

1,151.9 1,146.6

1,142.0

1,130.6

1,125.4

1,133.4

1,136.3

1,138.1

732.9

734.0

731.8

735.0

736.1

739.7

745.8

744.4

1,697.0

1,696.0

1,690.8

1,698.5

1,690.8

1,691.7

1,690.3

1,691.7

7,729.6 7,744.0

7,757.5

Apr.

May

7,794.9 7,583.8 7,583.0 7,561.0 7,572.9 7,555.7 7,523.3 7,549.4 7,608.3 7,639.8 7,702.5 7,706.1

7,477.6 7,26(5.8 7,271.1 7,244.9 7,255.5 7,239.9 7,207.8 7,230.5 7,288.6 7,323.0 7,380.3 7,389.2 7,413.1 7,429.2 7,446.0
3,437.1 3,248.8 3,256.8 3,259.2 3,292.7 3,287.8 3,245.9 3,242.2 3,291.7 3,318.3 3,374.8 3,373.7 3,394.5 3,419.2 3,439.9
2,337.7 2,185.7 2,174.4 2,159.4 2,170.2 2,151.6 2,135.9 2,131.2 2,177.6 2,207.9 2,226.6 2,236.6 2,261.1 2,276.3 2,297.1
750.4
753.0
754.3
753.9
747.8
745.0
746.5
748.1
747.9
746.0
743.8
755.8
757.0
779.7
757.0
1,606.2

1,597.3

1,601.0

317.3

31(5.9

311.9

15,645
Educational services............. 2,510.6
Health care and social
assistance........................ 13,134.0
Ambulatory health care
4,461.5
Offices of physicians.......... 1,911.2
399.7
Outpatient care centers......
Home health care services.... 638.6
Hospitals......................... 4,050.9
Nursing and residential
care facilities’.................. 2,675.8
Nursing care facilities........ 1,546.8
1,945.9
Child day care services......
714.6
12,036
Leisure and hospitality...........
Arts, entertainment,
and recreation................... 1,824.4
Performing arts and
382.3
spectator sports...............
Museums, historical sites,
115.0
zoos, and parks................
Amusements, gambling, and
recreation...................... 1,327.1
Accommodations and
food services.................... 10,211.3
Accommodations............... 1,852.2
Food services and drinking
8,359.1
5,258
Other services..........................
1,256.5
Repair and maintenance.....
Personal and laundry services 1,255.0
Membership associations and
organizations.................. 2,746.4
21,118
2,764
Federal, except U.S. Postal
1,891.0
873.0
4,905
State..............................
2,112.9
Other State government..... 2,791.8
13,449
7,479.3
Other local government..... 5,970.0

1,591.7 1,585.8

1,580.4

1,576.4

317.4

315.8

315.5

316.1

1,587.4 1,596.3 1,601.8

1,609.9

1,613.5

1,610.3

1,604.1

1,603.1

319.7

322.2

316.9

316.5

314.8

311.5

318.9

316.8

16,184 16,357 16,373 16,405 16,430 16,452 16,483 16,509 16,503 16,487 16,541 16,570 16,626 16,660
2,650.6 2,690.3 2,695.1 2,700.0 2,707.4 2,711.5 2,708.8 2,718.1 2,689.7 2,676.7 2,699.8 2,715.6 2,735.8 2,745.2
13,533.2 13,666.5 13,677.5 13,704.5 13,722.6 13,740.5 13,774.2 13,790.7 13,813.2 13,810.0 13,840.8 13,854.1 13,889.9 13,914.7
4,633.4 4,708.5 4,712.5 4,718.5 4,727.6 4,739.1 4,753.7 4,764.8 4,777.4 4,781.6 4,791.7 4,791.7 4,810.7 4,821.8
1,982.6 2,017.7 2,022.1 2,023.4 2,031.5 2,037.4 2,041.7 2,045.9 2,050.2 2,052.7 2,056.6 2,056.9 2,067.3 2,069.8
414.4
413.7
413.7
416.6
414.7
412.9
412.8
413.1
411.8
412.1
412.2
412.0
400.7
412.3
714.5
715.0
711.1
711.8
711.3
709.0
702.9
705.3
694.2
693.0
698.6
675.1
693.0
689.6
4,153.1 4,187.0 4,190.4 4,197.8 4,204.7 4,210.9 4,214.0 4,218.1 4,227.0 4,226.8 4,235.2 4,239.5 4,243.9 4,251.8
2,743.2 2,763.4 2,766.1 2,770.1 2,770.8 2,776.4 2,784.4 2,787.9 2,790.7 2,787.2 2,789.7 2,794.4 2,799.4 2,803.1
1,573.7 1,580.9 1,579.2 1,582.0 1,582.5 1,582.7 1,586.2 1,587.0 1,589.6 1,586.0 1,538.8 1,586.9 1,589.6 1,592.3
2,003.5 2,007.6 2,008.5 2,018.1 2,019.5 2,014.1 2,022.1 2,019.9 2,018.1 2,014.4 2,024.2 2,028.5 2,035.9 2,038.0
732.4
731.2
735.8
736.5
722.7
759.3
724.9
724.9
727.1
724.5
725.2
729.0
731.2
725.9
11,969 12,069 12,019 12,132 12,084 12,050 12,043 12,026 12,039 12,051 12,051 12,056 12,081 12,102
1,835.6 1,809.5 1,781.8 1,764.8

1,759.2

359.0

356.7

348.8

109.9

108.4

109.8

1,299.7 1,300.6

1,773.0

1,806.2

1,817.8

357.9

369.1

367.2

358.7

358.4

112.5

111.2

110.5

111.6

111.2

1,307.6

1,325.9

1,340.1

1,365.3 1,339.9 1,312.9

1,758.4 1,763.8

1,759.8

1,759.1

1,762.5

1,762.7

346.5

347.4

347.3

351.6

350.5

348.6

109.8

110.0

109.8

109.1

110.0

110.4

1,302.1

1,306.4

1,302.7

1,298.4

1,302.0

1,303.7

10,191.2 10,262.5 10,200.8 10,296.1 10,274.8 10,267.7 10,278.6 10,266.7 10,280.4 10,286.9 10,290.8 10,296.7 10,318.6 10,339.3
1,779.4 1,802.3 1,805.2 1,812.0 1,801.7 1,788.4 1,769.0 1,763.6 1,769.1 1,778.6 1,769.1 1,754.7 1,751.6 1,764.5
8,411.7 8,460.6 8,395.6 8,484.1 8,473.1 8,479.3 8,509.6 8,503.1 8,511.3 8,508.3 8,521.7 8,542.0 8,567.0 8,574.8
5,314
5,316
5,312
5,316
5,319
5,323
5,322
5,320
5,334
5,329
5,323
5,352
5,335
5,848
1,240.6 1,236.3 1,224.3 1,218.6 1,215.3 1,213.8 1,215.6 1,215.1 1,218.6 1,219.5 1,222.3 1,219.7 1,216.4 1,213.1
1,224.2
1,219.7
1,222.0
1,223.5
1,246.7 1,236.2 1,232.7 1,235.6 1,234.8 1,229.5 1,227.0 1,226.3 1,225.0 1,224.6
2,860.7 2,879.7 2,878.2 2,879.4 2,879.0 2,880.0 2,879.1 2,878.7 2,879.5 2,872.1 2,872.7 2,874.8 2,873.8 2,878.5
21,489 21,540 21,556 21,576 21,588 21,547 21,526 21,484 21,476 21,458 21,470 21,456 21,481 21,488
2,732
2,723
2,747
2,745
2,742
2,749
2,769
2,761
2,791
2,789
2,767
2,786
2,782
2,778
1,922.5
844.8
5,006
2,218.8
2,787.4
13,716
7,657.2
6,058.5

1,954.2
827.3
4,983
2,203.0
2,780.0
13,775
7,697.0
6,077.9

1,956.4
821.7
4,984
2,202.5
2,781.0
13,794
7,698.1
6,095.8

1,960.3
825.3
4,974
2,196.8
2,777.3
13,816
7,708.5
6,107.6

1 Includes other industries not shown separately,
p « preliminary.
NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the NorthAmerican industry


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Feb.

Mar.

2001

1,966.2
824.8
4,979
2,205.1
2,773.4
13,818
7,712.4
6,105.7

1,964.8
823.9
4,958
2,188.7
2,769.7
13,800
7,693.6
6,106.5

1,946.0
823.0
4,952
2,186.5
2,765.3
13,805
7,703.5
6,101.1

1,937.0
823.6
4,941
2,180.8
2,759.9
13,782
7,689.1
6,092.6

1,928.2
821.1
4,925
2,174.3
2,751.1
13,802
7,718.7
6,083.5

1.928.S
817.7
4,920
2,175.5
2,744.7
13,791
7,723.5
6,067.2

1,929.5
815.8
4,928
2,186.6
2,741.6
13,797
7,735.1
6,061.9

1,929.6
812.3
4,948
2,203.2
2,744.3
13,766
7,682.6
6,083.8

1,921.6
810.8
4,955
2,210.5
2,744.3
13,794
7,701.5
6,092.1

1,915.1
807.6
4,960
2,215.0
2,745.0
13,805
7,705.4
6,099.2

Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (Sic) system.
NAics-based data by industry are not comparable with sic-based data. See "Notes on the
data"for a description of the most recent benchmark revision, preliminary.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

77

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

13. A verage weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers' on private nonfarm payrolls, by industry, monthly
d ata seasonally adjusted
A nnual average

Industry

2001

Oct.

2002
Nov.

2003

Dec.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

O ct.p

Nov.p

34.0

33.8

33.8

33.8

33.8

33.7

33.8

33.7

33.7

33.7

33.6

33.7

33.7

33.8

33.9

GOODS-PRODUCING..............................

39.9

39.7

39.7

39.8

40.0

39.6

39.9

39.5

39.7

39.8

39.6

39.8

39.9

39.9

40.0

Natural resources and mining.............

44.6

43.0

42.3

43.0

43.1

43.3

44.2

43.4

43.8

43.7

43.2

43.7

43.7

43.8

43.7

Construction..........................................

38.7

38.2

38.0

38.2

38.9

37.6

38.7

37.9

38.5

38.4

38.3

38.6

38.4

38.4

38.3

Manufacturing........................................

Overtime hours...........................

40.3
4.0

40.3
4.2

40.4
4.3

40.5
4.3

40.4
4.4

40.4
4.3

40.4
4.1

40.1
4.0

40.2
4.1

40.3
4.0

40.1
4.1

40.2
4.1

40.5
4.2

40.6
4.3

40.8
4.4

Durable goods...............................
Overtime hours...........................
Wood products............................
Nonmetallic mineral products..........
Primary metals.............................
Fabricated metal products..............
Machinery...................................
Computer and electronic products....
Electrical equipment and appliances..
Transportation equipment...............
Furniture and related products.........
Miscellaneous manufacturing..........

40.6
3.9
40.2
41.6
42.4
40.6
40.9
39.8
39.8
41.9
38.3
38.8

40.6
4.3
39.9
41.9
42.4
40.6
40.5
39.3
39.9
42.4
38.7
38.8

40.6
4.3
39.8
41.6
42.2
40.4
40.6
40.2
40.2
42.2
38.7
38.6

40.9
4.3
39.9
41.9
42.6
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.6
42.4
39.9
38.8

40.8
4.4
40.0
42.1
42.4
40.6
40.5
39.9
40.3
42.5
38.8
38.9

40.7
4.3
39.9
42.0
42.5
40.5
40.9
39.8
40.8
42.2
38.6
38.6

40.6
4.1
40.1
42.6
42.6
40.5
40.5
40.3
40.6
41.4
38.2
38.3

40.3
4.0
40.0
42.0
42.2
40.3
40.6
40.1
40.0
41.2
37.9
38.0

40.5
4.1
39.9
42.4
42.2
40.6
40.6
40.5
40.3
41.2
38.4
38.1

40.7
4.1
40.3
42.2
42.0
40.5
40.9
40.5
41.0
41.4
38.9
38.6

40.5
4.1
40.7
41.6
41.7
40.5
40.3
40.5
40.4
41.3
38.9
38.4

40.5
4.2
40.4
42.1
41.9
40.5
40.7
41.1
40.6
40.7
39.1
38.2

40.8
4.3
40.4
41.9
42.2
40.7
41.0
40.6
40.6
42.0
39.3
38.4

41.0
4.4
40.8
42.2
42.4
40.9
40.9
40.7
40.9
41.9
39.3
38.4

41.2
4.5
41.0
42.4
42.9
41.0
41.2
40.8
40.6
42.2
39.7
38.9

Nondurable goods..........................
Overtime hours...........................
Food manufacturing.......................
Beverage and tobacco products.......
Textile mills.................................
Textile product mills......................
Apparel......................................
Leather and allied products............
Paper and paper products..............
Printing and related support
activities....................................
Petroleumand coal products...........
Chemicals...................................
Plastics and rubber products...........

39.1
4.1
39.6
40.9
40.0
38.6
36.0
36.4
42.1

39.9
4.1
39.4
39.4
40.0
38.9
35.8
38.5
41.5

40.0
4.2
39.5
39.0
40.1
38.7
36.5
38.9
41.5

40.0
4.4
39.4
38.5
40.4
39.3
36.3
39.0
41.8

39.8
4.3
39.1
39.3
39.2
39.2
36.2
39.3
41.6

39.9
4.3
39.1
39.3
40.0
39.2
36.0
39.4
41.8

40.0
4.2
39.6
39.4
39.5
39.0
35.9
39.7
41.8

39.8
4.1
39.4
39.6
39.1
38.5
35.6
39.3
41.6

39.7
4.0
39.3
39.0
38.4
39.0
35.4
39.3
41.4

39.7
3.9
39.4
39.0
38.6
39.1
35.0
38.8
41.4

39.4
4.0
39.0
38.5
37.7
39.8
34.6
39.8
41.2

39.7
3.9
39.3
38.8
38.7
39.9
34.7
39.0
41.2

39.9
.4.1
39.4
39.3
39.1
40.6
35.2
38.6
41.2

40.0
4.1
39.4
39.2
39.3
40.5
35.8
39.3
41.6

40.1
4.3
39.5
39.7
39.9
40.5
36.1
39.5
41.7

38.7
43.8
41.9
40.0

38.5
43.5
42.5
40.5

38.4
43.6
42.6
40.3

38.5
44.0
42.3
40.3

38.5
43.9
42.3
40.2

38.3
45.1
42.8
40.3

38.5
45.8
42.7
40.2

38.0
44.3
42.4
40.0

37.9
44.1
42.2
40.3

38.1
44.1
42.2
40.1

38.0
43.9
42.1
40.0

38.0
44.4
42.3
40.2

38.2
44.2
42.3
40.5

38.6
44.9
42.1
40.7

38.6
44.3
42.5
40.7

32.5

32.5

32.5

32.5

32.4

32.4

32.5

32.4

32.4

32.4

32.3

32.4

32.4

32.4

32.5

33.5
38.4
30.7
36.7
41.4
36.9
35.8

33.6
37.8
30.9
36.9
41.0
36.5
35.5

33.6
37.9
30.8
37.0
41.1
36.6
35.6

33.5
37 .8
30.8
37.0
41.2
36.4
35.7

33.5
37.6
30.8
36.9
41.2
35.9
35.6

33.4
37.7
30.7
36.7
41.2
36.2
35.6

33.4
37.8
30.9
36.8
41.4
36.3
35.6

33.4
37.8
30.8
36.5
41.0
36.2
35.5

33.4
37.8
30.8
36.6
40.9
36.4
35.6

33.4
37.8
30.8
36.6
41.0
36.4
35.5

33.4
37.8
30.6
36.9
40.9
36.4
35.5

33.5
37.9
30.8
36.9
40.9
36.3
35.5

33.6
37.9
30.9
36.9
40.5
36.2
35.4

33.7
38.1
31.0
37.1
41.1
36.2
35.4

33.6
38.0
30.9
37.0
41.1
36.4
35.5

34.2
32.3
25.8
32.3

34.2
32.5
25.9
32.0

34.2
32.5
25.9
32.0

34.2
32.4
25.8
31.9

34.3
32.5
25.8
31.8

34.3
32.5
25.6
31.9

34.2
32.5
25.7
31.9

34.0
32.5
25.6
31.8

34.1
32.5
25.6
31.8

34.1
32.5
25.5
31.8

34.0
32.5
25.3
31.7

33.9
32.7
25.4
31.7

34.0
32.5
25.6
31.7

34.0
32.5
25.6
31.7

34.1
32.7
25.8
31.8

TOTAL PRIVATE..................................

PRIVATE SERVICEPROVIDING........................................
Trade, transportation, and
utilities..................................................

Wholesale trade.............................
Retail trade....................................
Transportation and warehousing........
Utilities.........................................
Information..............................................
Financial activities..................................
Professional and business
services.................................................
Education and health services.............
Leisure and hospitality.........................
Other services.........................................

1 Data relate to production workers in natural resources and mining and manu­
facturing, construction workers in construction, and nonsupervisory workers in the
service-providing industries.
p = preliminary.

78

Jan.

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard industrial Classification
(SIC) system. NAlCS-based data by industry are not comparable with SIC-based data.
See "Notes on the data”for a description of the most recent benchmark revision.

14. Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers1 on private nonfarm payrolls, by industry,
monthly data seasonally adjusted
Annual average

2003

2002

Industry
2001

2002

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

TOTAL PRIVATE

GOODS-PRODUCING............................

PRIVATE SERVICE­
PROVIDING.........................................
Trade,transportation, and
utilities.............................................

Transportation and warehousing......

$14,53
8.11
15.78
17.00
18.00
14.76
1A.06
15.38
13.75

16.29 $15.14 $15.20 $15.22 $15.29 $15.29 $15.30 $15.35 $15.38 $15.43 $15.45 $15.44 $15.45 $15.46
8.29
8.32
8.30
8.27
8.27
8.32
8.22
8.31
8.30
8.24
8.27
8.30
8.28
8.26
16.33 16.52 16.60 16.63 16.65 16.68 16.71 16.76 16.79 16.81 16.86 16.89 16.88 16.99
17.22 17.48 17.37 17.45 17.45 17.54 17.67 17.55 17.60 17.62 17.69 17.74 17.79 17.80
18.51 18.69 18.81 18.77 18.84 18.83 18.90 18.95 18.96 18.96 18.99 19.02 19.03 19.06
15.29 15.48 15.55 15.59 15.63 15.64 15.63 15.68 15.72 15.73 15.79 15.83 15.80 15.83
14.54 14.70 14.77 14.78 14.84 14.88 14.89 14.92 14.98 14.96 15.02 15.05 15.01 15.02
16.01 16.25 16.28 16.33 16.35 16.34 16.33 16.37 16.42 16.42 16.49 16.55 16.49 16.50
14.15 14.29 14.41 14.44 14.50 14.55 14.56 14.61 14.63 14.66 14.70 14.71 14.73 14.77

14.16

14.56

14.76

14.81

14.82

14.92

14.91

14.91

14.97

15.00

15.06

15.06

15.04

15.07

15.08

13.70
16.77
11.29
15.33
23.58
19.80
15.59

14.02
16.97
11.67
15.77
23.94
20.23
16.17

14.17
17.14
11.79
16.02
24.02
20.55
16.51

14.19
17.13
11.83
16.02
24.09
20.74
16.56

14.21
17.16
11.85
16.05
24.05
20.70
16.69

14.29
17.25
11.88
16.22
24.19
20.79
16.77

14.26
17.22
11.85
16.22
24.36
20.90
16.78

14.24
17.25
11.83
16.18
24.33
20.97
16.93

14.31
17.29
11.90
16.25
24.48
21.09
17.02

14.34
17.34
11.92
16.30
24.62
21.13
17.17

14.40
17.36
11.96
16.40
24.73
21.26
17.33

14.39
17.40
11.96
16.36
24.95
21.32
17.33

14.37
17.40
11.94
16.34
24.93
21.28
17.25

14.39
17.42
11.95
16.34
25.17
21.26
17.25

14.40
17.39
11.96
16.35
25.20
21.23
17.22

16.33

16.81

17.04

17.09

17.02

17.17

17.20

17.23

17.24

17.22

17.23

17.24

17.24

17.30

17.36

14.64
8.35
13.27

15.22
8.57
13.72

15.45
8.66
13.89

15.52
8.73
13.94

15.57
8.71
13.98

15.61
8.77
14.03

15.63
8.72
14.02

15.57
8.71
13.98

15.64
8.73
13.97

15.67
8.75
13.98

15.72
8.76
13.98

15.76
8.75
13.98

15.76
8.76
13.98

15.80
8.76
13.97

15.81
8.77
13.97

Professional and business
Education and health

Other services.....................................

1 Data relate to production workers in natural resources and mining and manufac­
turing, construction workers inconstruction, and nonsupervisory workers inthe
service-providing industries,
p = preliminary.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American industry
Classification System (n a ic s ), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (Sic) system, n a ic s
based data by industry are not comparable with SIC-based data. See "Notes on the data" for a
description of the most recent benchmark revision.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

79

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

15. Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers1 on private nonfarm payrolls, by industry
Annual iverag e

Industry

TOTAL PRIVATE...............................

Seasonally adjusted.................

2002

2003

2001

2002

$14.53
-

$14.95 $15.16 $15.26 $15.27 $15.35 $15.34 $15.31 $15.31 $15.34 $15.32 $15.35 $15.48 $15.46 $15.51
15.14 15.20 15.22 15.29 15.29 15.30 15.35 15.38 15.43 15.45 15.44 15.45 15.46
-

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

Aug

Sept.

O ct.p

Nov.p

Manufacturing.......................................

15.78
17.00
18.00
14.76

16.33
17.22
18.51
15.29

16.55
17.45
18.70
15.51

16.66
17.40
18.90
15.65

16.56
17.49
18.68
15.61

16.54
17.43
18.69
15.62

16.59
17.58
18.73
15.62

16.66
17.76
18.83
15.63

16.71
17.47
18.85
15.64

16.78
17.52
18.90
15.69

16.84
17.61
18.99
15.69

16.92
17.61
19.06
15.76

17.01
17.78
19.17
15.88

16.93
17.78
19.11
15.79

16.92
17.78
19.07
15.84

Durable goods.............................
Wood products...........................
Nonmetallic mineral products........
Primary metals...........................
Fabricated metal products............
Machinery.................................
Computer and electronic products...
Electrical equipment and appliances
Transportation equipment............
Furniture and related products......
Miscellaneous manufacturing.......

15.38
11.99
14.86
17.06
14.19
15.49
15.42
13.78
19.48
12.14
12.46

16.01 16.29
12.33 12.43
15.39 15.46
17.68 17.99
14.68 14.85
15.93 16.06
16.19 16.26
13.97 14.03
20.64 21.41
12.62 12.79
12.91 13.06

16.39
12.49
15.55
18.09
14.97
16.20
16.41
14.16
21.42
12.93
13.08

16.34
12.52
15.62
18.05
14.95
16.11
16.32
14.08
21.22
12.93
13.12

16.34
12.51
15.48
17.96
14.92
16.16
16.55
14.18
21.16
12.91
13.14

16.33
12.51
15.52
17.86
14.97
16.19
16.55
14.25
21.07
12.93
13.22

16.30
12.48
15.69
18.03
14.94
16.20
16.59
14.25
20.94
12.89
13.20

16.33
12.57
15.73
17.93
14.92
16.23
16.56
14.19
21.08
12.90
13.19

16.40
12.70
15.70
18.02
14.92
16.33
16.75
14.28
21.20
12.96
13.13

16.31
12.81
15.83
18.23
15.00
16.39
16.76
14.29
20.77
12.98
13.25

16.47
12.76
15.81
18.10
15.04
16.35
16.78
14.13
21.30
13.05
13.26

16.61
12.83
15.83
18.27
15.09
16.42
16.75
14.47
21.56
13.10
13.41

16.51
12.81
15.94
18.22
15.02
16.38
16.72
14.31
21.24
13.01
13.46

16.53
12.86
15.92
18.31
15.05
16.53
16.74
14.49
21.16
13.09
13.53

Nondurable goods.........................
Food manufacturing....................
Beverages and tobacco products ....
Textile mills...............................
Textile product mills....................
Apparel.....................................
Leather and allied products..........
Paper and paper products............
Printing and related support activities
Petroleumand coal products........
Chemicals.................................
Plastics and rubber products........

13.75
12.18
17.67
11.40
10.60
8.82
10.69
16.38
14.48
22.90
17.57
13.21

14.15 14.31 14.48 14.47 14.49
12.54 12.61 12.81 12.70 12.66
17.68 17.60 18.04 17.68 17.53
11.73 11.71 11.83 11.99 11.92
10.96 11.07 11.20 11.12 11.11
9.10
9.19
9.30
9.30
9.33
11.01 11.23 11.51 11.53 11.62
16.89 17.09 17.26 17.21 17.22
14.93 15.19 15.35 15.28 15.32
23.06 23.35 23.65 23.58 24.29
17.97 18.29 18.34 18.28 18.29
13.55 13.70 13.81 13.91 13.95

14.53
12.70
17.69
11.92
10.98
9.45
11.62
17.22
15.33
24.17
18.33
14.00

14.57
12.72
17.70
11.95
11.14
9.47
11.76
17.38
15.35
23.92
18.35
14.07

14.56
12.71
17.93
11.95
11.13
9.49
11.71
17.38
15.26
23.36
18.46
14.09

14.58
12.70
17.56
11.92
11.18
9.47
11.59
17.33
15.26
25.53
18.55
14.18

14.72
12.81
17.74
11.97
11.29
9.68
11.57
17.59
15.41
23.21
18.53
14.37

14.67
12.78
17.60
11.94
11.47
9.75
11.73
17.46
15.37
23.01
18.61
14.26

14.74
12.88
17.58
12.06
11.49
9.77
11.69
17.54
15.48
23.51
18.68
14.29

14.68
12.76
17.86
12.03
11.39
9.69
11.88
17.56
15.42
23.69
18.67
14.16

14.76
12.84
17.89
12.14
11.37
9.67
11.95
17.62
15.57
23.94
18.79
14.20

14.16

14.56

15.00

14.94

14.92

14.94

14.91

14.92

15.05

15.05

15.13

13.70
16.77
11.29
15.33
23.58
19.80
15.59

14.02 14.12 14.12 14.24 14.36 14.34 14.31 14.28 14.33 14.31 14.32
16.97 17.14 17.22 17.18 17.32 17.29 17.26 17.24 17.33 17.29 17.32
11.67 11.73 11.76 11.88 11.92 11.90 11.90 11.88 11.91 11.90 11.90
15.77 16.03 16.04 16.02 16.26 16.23 16.21 16.19 16.29 16.38 16.36
23.94 24.12 24.26 24.02 24.16 24.41 24.47 24.52 24.58 24.60 24.78
20.23 20.67 20.90 20.79 20.88 20.88 20.98 21.01 21.03 21.10 21.21
16.17 16.49 16.64 16.70 16.95 16.89 16.93 16.97 17.16 17.24 17.30

14.42
17.38
12.00
16.35
25.11
21.45
17.25

14.38
17.39
11.91
16.35
25.19
21.35
17.23

14.39
17.45
11.91
16.38
25.23
21.32
17.30

16.33

16.81

17.01

17.28

17.14

17.40

17.36

17.21

17.18

17.25

17.11

17.07

17.15

17.17

17.48

14.64
8.35
13.27

15.22 15.46
8.57 8.69
13.72 13.88

15.55
8.81
14.01

15.61
8.74
14.00

15.61
8.80
14.02

15.62
8.73
14.02

15.56
8.69
13.99

15.58
8.72
13.99

15.61
8.69
13.97

15.69
8.66
13.89

15.75
8.66
13.91

15.78
8.77
13.99

15.79
8.77
13.95

15.80
8.79
13.97

GOODS-PRODUCING.............................
Natural resources and mining............
Construction.........................................

PRIVATE SERVICEPROVIDING..........................................
Trade, transportation, and
utilities.................................................

Wholesale trade...........................
Retail trade.................................
Transportation and warehousing.....
Utilities.......................................
Information.......................................
Financial activities...............................

14.77

14.88

14.92

15.04

Professional and business
services...............................................
Education and health
services..............................................
Leisure and hospitality.......................
Other services.......................................

1 Data relate to production workers in natural resources and mining and
manufacturing, construction workers in construction, and nonsupervisory workers in
the service-providing industries.

80

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
system. NAiCS-based data by industry are not comparable with SIC-based data. See
"Notes on the data" for a description of the most recent benchmark revision.

16. Average weekly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers1 on private nonfarm payrolls, by industry
Annual average
2001
TOTAL PRIVATE.....................

Seasonally adjusted.......
GOODS-PRODUCING..................
Natural resources
and mining...............................
Construction.............................
Manufacturing...........................

Durable goods.....................
Wood products...................
Nonmetallic mineral products....
Primary metals...................
Fabricated metal products.....
Machinery.........................
Computer and electronic
products..........................
Electrical equipment and
appliances.......................
Transportation equipment......
Furniture and related
products..........................
Miscellaneous
Nondurable goods.................
Food manufacturing.............
Beverages andtobacco
products..........................
Textile mills.......................
Textile product mills.............

Nov.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

732.90
706.86
629.71
664.63
490.99
643.14
762.78
604.40
653.64

748.20
710.64
644.78
681.82
499.60
645.33
783.30
619.76
670.68

743.33
707.97
625.96
661.77
490.78
640.42
765.32
605.48
650.84

747.75
678.45
626.36
660.14
490.39
634.68
759.71
601.28
657.71

777.00
715.49
629.49
663.00
497.90
651.84
760.84
604.79
658.93

765.46
708.01
623.64
655.26
497.95
655.84
760.87
599.09
654.48

766.93
731.38
628.73
663.00
505.31
677.24
760.23
605.75
662.18

776.14
737.10
635.45
672.40
520.70
673.53
760.44
608.74
671.16

760.75
740.61
621.32
650.77
521.37
664.86
749.25
598.50
652..32

776.60
752.87
633.55
668.68
519.33
673.51
752.96
609.12
662.18

784.10 782.32 782.32
749.55 743.36 726.57
647.90 642.65 652.61
684.33 6,678.56 686.00
526.03 525.21 529.83
675.94 679.04 678.19
776.45 770.71 789.16
617.18 615.82 623.07
673.22 668.30 684.34

613.07

642.86

660.16

681.02

647.90

657.04

668.62

660.28

667.37

680.05

668.72

686.30

683.40

682.18

693.04

567.31
824.57

581.53
871.17

588.93
918.40

589.57
900.58

598.44
899.30

548.00
817.08

560.09
877.84

571.02
901.36

591.89
921.06

564.61
895.48

575.71
886.60

577.13
874.41

570.00
864.82

569.02
874.82

588.34
888.28

464.57

494.14

494.97

522.37

493.93

494.45

493.93

488.53

491.49

505.44

504.92

514.17

518.76

508.69

522.29

483.44
548.41
481.67

499.09
567.11
496.78

506.73
576.69
505.66

515.35
586.44
513.68

505.12
571.57
491.49

504.58
572.36
487.41

508.97
579.75
496.57

500.28
575.52
493.54

502.54
576.58
496.96

506.82
580.28
500.38

502..18
577.02
498.31

505.21
582.40
507.37

514.94
594.02
516.49

516.86
590.14
506.57

531.73
599.26
516.17

697.09
476.70
429.49
333.77
413.05
707.36

689.92
469.57
426.20
337.27
440.22
716.07

699.95
480.30
449.12
338.52
451.19
735.28

675.38
467.61
431.46
332.01
447.36
714.22

669.65
472.03
429.96
333.08
456.67
711.19

686.37
473.22
431.51
340.20
463.64
716.35

695.61
472.03
431.12
336.19
468.05
717.79

704.65
461.27
432.96
336.90
459.03
714.32

695.38
463.69
441.61
337.13
454.33
717.46

690.09
440.50
448.21
332.02
452.39
719.43

688.16
462.08
459.95
338.33
455.12
715.86

701.44
475.16
468.79
341.95
448.90
731.42

701.90
470.37
460.16
348.84
468.07
732.25

710.23
486.81
462.76
351.99
474.42
741.80

573.42

587.85

597.12

580.64

582.16

591.74

580.23

573.78

578.35

580.96

585.60

600.62

599.84

608.79

992.05 1,025.07 1,040.60 1,039.88 1,095.48 1,109.40 1,052.48 1,006.82 1,047.09 1,025.88 1,010.14 1,048.55 1,070.79 1,053.36
759.57 784.64 786.79 769.59 780.98 780.86 776.21 777.17 786.52 772.70 785.34 793.90 786.01 806.09
549.57

552.11

566.21

556.40

558.00

561.40

561.39

569.24

572.87

564.74

571.83

583.03

579.14

583.62

460.32

473.10

478.55

488.06

477.44

488.80

487.50

481.07

481.92

490.03

484.58

486.39

486.12

486.12

494.75

459.53
643.45
346.16

471.09
643.99
360.53

470.20
649.61
357.77

478.67
657.80
366.91

467.07
639.10
356.40

476.75
654.70
362.37

478.96
655.29
364.14

475.09
647.25
362.95

476.95
651.67
365.90

487.22
663.74
373.97

483.68
651.83
372.47

485.45
658.16
373.66

485.95
658.70
372.00

483.17
660.82
366.83

483.50
671.83
365.64

562.70
977.18
731.11
558.02

580.68
978.44
739.41
575.43

593.11
996.16
758.59
585.40

603.10
997.09
769.12
604.03

581.53
987.22
742.20
587.84

593.49 595.64 586.80
992.98 1,003.25 1,005.72
760.03 757.94 753.18
611.90 608.04 595.94

590.94
1,000.42
758.46
599.04

604.36
1,010.24
773.90
621.19

604.42
1,006.14
768.04
606.85

606.96
1,013.50
774.17
612.42

608.22
1,024.49
774.35
607.20

606.59
1,037.83
772.87
606.50

614.25
1,047.05
784.58
624.53

557.84

574.59

580.04

596.16

579.33

598.56

597.18

585.14

584.12

598.58

581.74

581.08

579.67

582.06

599.56

473.39
215.19
428.64

493.02
221.15
439.65

502.45
221.60
442.77

506.93
227.30
449.72

507.33
217.63
442.40

508.89 509.21
224.40 224.36
445.84 I 447.24

502.59
219.86
443.48

503.23
222.36
443.48

510.45
226.81
447.04

509.93 515.03
226.03 227.76
441.70 I 443.73

512.85
221.88
443.48

511.60
223.64
442.22

519.82
225.90
445.64

Education and

1 Data relate to production workers in natural resources and mining and manufacturing,
construction workers in construction, and nonsupervisory workers in the service­
providing industries.
NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the NorthAmerican


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

July

743.11
711.61
618.87
652.83
491.98
646.74
749.08
596.44
645.81

Professional and

Other services..........................

June

757.92
695.89
595.19
624.54
481.36
618.79
723.95
576.60
632.77

Trade, transportation,

Retail trade.........................
Transportation and
warehousing.....................
Utilities..............................

Dec.

May

$493.20 $506.22 $510.89 $520.37 $510.02 $517.30 518.49. $511.35 $515.95 $523.09 $517.82 $521.90 $523.22 $522.55 $527.34
511.73 513.76 514.44 515.27 516.80 515.61 517.30 518.31 518.45 520.67 520.33 523.21 524.09
630.04 651,6C 657.04 668.07 654.12 645.06 658.62 654.74 665.06 672.88 665.18 678.49 685.50 680.59 680.18

721.68
456.64
408.56
317.15
Leather and allied products.... 388.83
Paper and paper products..... 690.06
Printing and related
support activities................ 560.89
Petroleumand coal
products......................... 1,003.34
Chemicals......................... 735.54
Plastics and rubber
products......................... 528.69

PRIVATE SERVICEPROVIDING...............................

2002

2003

2002

Industry Classification System (n a ic s ), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (sic)
system. NAics-based data by industry are not comparable with sic-based data. See "Notes on
the data"for a description of the most recent benchmarkrevision.
Dash indicates data not available, p= preliminary.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

81

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

17. Diffusion indexes of employment change, seasonally adjusted
[In percent]
Tim espan and year

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Private nonfarm payrolls, 278 industries

Over 1-month span:
1999.....................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003.....................................

56.3
65.5
52.3
40.5
44.2

64.7
60.3
49.6
37.0
36.7

56.7
65.5
48.6
37.6
44.1

65.8
58.8
36.5
41.0
46.9

64.2
47.7
41.4
41.7
43.3

61.9
61.7
38.1
43.7
37.2

63.3
65.5
35.6
39.0
43.2

59.9
52.9
38.5
41.7
40.8

57.6
52.3
39.0
43.3
50.0

64.4
54.1
35.6
43.9
53.6

69.1
57.7
37.8
42.4
54.7

64.4
53.2
36.0
37.2

Over 3-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

61.5
70.1
54.9
34.4
36.0

64.9
66.0
50.7
38.3
35.6

61.0
68.3
50.5
36.5
36.0

65.8
68.3
43.5
35.4
41.2

66.4
58.5
37.2
36.7
43.0

69.1
56.3
39.7
38.8
40.6

66.9
58.1
36.2
39.7
37.6

64.4
62.2
35.8
41.4
34.5

62.2
55.9
34.5
38.1
43.5

62.9
53.1
32.2
39.0
49.3

66.7
54.0
31.7
37.8
53.8

69.6
58.3
30.9
34.9

Over 6-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

66.9
67.6
53.2
30.6
37.4

64.9
68.7
51.4
29.9
36.5

63.7
71.4
50.7
31.1
35.1

64.0
71.9
47.1
31.3
34.7

65.6
68.5
42.8
33.3
37.4

65.8
66.2
38.8
35.8
36.5

66.7
67.3
37.6
36.9
38.7

66.2
60.4
34.5
37.4
35.1

69.4
58.3
31.1
37.8
40.8

68.7
55.0
32.9
39.9
40.6

66.4
61.0
31.3
38.3
46.6

66.5
55.2
31.7
35.8

Over 12-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

70.5
70.9
59.5
33.6
33.8

68.7
69.2
59.5
31.7
33.3

68.2
73.2
53.4
30.2
34.5

68.0
71.0
49.3
30.2
35.4

68.3
69.8
48.6
30.4
36.5

68.3
71.0
45.0
30.6
35.4

68.0
70.0
43.3
30.8
35.8

68.0
70.3
43.9
31.8
33.6

67.8
70.3
39.9
31.5
38.1

69.1
65.6
37.8
30.0
36.9

68.3
63.8
37.1
33.5
36.5

69.1
62.1
34.9
33.3

Manufacturing payrolls, 84 industries

Over 1-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

42.3
50.6
24.4
19.0
36.3

38.7
53.6
22.0
22.6
19.0

33.3
54.8
24.4
20.8
27.4

39.3
42.9
14.3
33.9
20.2

52.4
39.9
14.3
30.4
30.4

34.5
53.6
19.6
32.1
25.6

50.0
62.5
14.3
34.5
31.5

40.5
28.6
13.7
25.0
25.6

41.7
24.4
17.9
31.0
33.3

50.6
35.1
16.7
19.6
40.5

56.0
41.1
16.7
21.4
42.3

51.8
38.7
9.5
25.0

Over 3-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

33.9
54.2
34.5
11.9
14.9

40.5
54.8
24.4
11.9
15.5

37.5
58.3
17.9
16.7
19.6

35.7
51.8
14.3
20.2
16.7

41.7
41.7
11.9
21.4
17.9

43.5
41.1
14.3
20.2
14.3

42.3
54.8
10.7
28.6
20.2

38.1
48.2
7.7
25.6
18.5

41.1
29.2
8.3
25.6
24.4

44.6
25.6
9.5
17.9
26.8

49.4
25.0
8.9
14.9
33.3

56.5
42.3
8.3
10.7

Over 6-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

37.5
47.0
23.8
7.7
13.7

32.7
51.2
24.4
8.9
14.3

30.4
56.5
20.8
7.7
12.5

33.3
57.1
17.9
8.9
11.9

36.9
49.4
14.9
12.5
12.5

38.1
47.6
11.9
16.7
15.5

38.1
56.0
13.7
19.6
13.1

34.5
44.0
9.5
19.6
13.7

40.5
36.9
8.3
23.8
16.1

46.4
35.1
6.5
17.9
19.0

41.1
34.5
6.5
16.7
24.4

48.2
31.0
6.0
13.7

Over 12-month span:
1999......................................
2000......................................
2001......................................
2002......................................
2003......................................

35.7
41.7
29.8
7.1
13.7

32.1
39.3
32.1
6.0
15.5

29.8
47.0
20.8
6.0
16.7

32.1
50.0
19.0
7.1
13.1

32.7
46.4
13.1
7.7
15.5

32.1
52.4
12.5
5.4
16.1

34.5
51.8
10.7
6.0
13.1

32.1
49.4
11.9
8.9
14.3

33.3
46.4
11.9
7.7
12.5

39.3
40.5
10.1
9.5
13.1

41.1
35.1
8.3
13.1
11.9

42.9
33.3
6.0
13.1

NOTE: Figures are the percent of industries with employment
increasing plus one-half of the industries with unchanged
employment, where 50 percent indicates an equal balance
between industres with increasing and decreasing employment.

82

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

See the "Definitions" in this section. See "Notes on the data" for
a description of the most recent benchmark revision,
Data for the two most recent months are preliminary.

18. Establishment size and employment covered under Ul, private ownership, by Supersector, first quarter 2001
Size of establishments
industry, establishments, and
employment

Total all industries2

Employment, March ........................
Natural resources and mining

Establishments, first quarter .............
Employment, March ........................
Construction

Employment, March ........................
Manufacturing

Employment, March ........................
Trade, transportation, and utilities

Employment, March ........................
Information

Establishments, first quarter .............
Employment, March ........................
Financial activities

Employment, March ........................
Professional and business services

Employment, March ........................
Education and health services

Employment, March ........................
Leisure and hospitality

Employment, March ........................
Other services

Establishments, first quarter .............
Employment, March ........................

Total

Fewer than
5 workers1

10 to 19
workers

20 to 49
workers

50 to 99
workers

100 to 249
workers

500 to 999
workers

250 to 499
workers

1,000 or
more
workers

6,021
11,678
7,917,065 12,710,477

31,149
208,084
121,189
598,438
858,606
1,304,741
8,633,337 11,588,220 18,104,061 14,323,060 18,158,276 10,611,556

7,665,968
108,932,804

4,526,062
6,886,752

127,969
1,566,104

74,644
110,942

23,304
154,199

15,169
203,845

9,501
285,486

2,935
200,360

1,700
254,358

499
172,011

167
109,973

50
74,930

765,649
6,481,334

494,254
714,992

127,017
832,978

75,983
1,020,982

47,230
1,410,131

13,591
925,178

6,040
890,282

1,176
390,630

293
197,146

65
99,016

398,837
16,806,452

148,682
255,376

67,510
453,750

60,267
830,685

58,942
1,836,858

28,633
2,009,224

22,490
3,456,620

7,636
2,622,512

3,198
2,166,352

1,479
3,175,075

1,840,104
25,518,430

969,760
1,629,626

376,578
2,507,906

244,890
3,278,074

153,450
4,630,611

53,110
3,670,363

32,898
4,888,033

6,970
2,343,794

1,813
1,191,894

635
1,378,129

150,855
3,692,948

84,672
113,812

20,636
137,426

17,119
234,492

14,772
457,236

6,698
465,567

4,475
685,746

1,476
507,063

674
462,533

333
629,073

716,808
7,623,126

458,390
750,421

128,266
843,311

71,615
952,198

37,529
1,121,825

11,731
801,994

6,084
917,250

1,808
621,240

897
609,199

488
1,005,688

1,238,267
16,441,289

825,617
1,170,098

173,773
1,140,772

107,694
1,451,932

73,807
2,245,729

29,139
2,022,745

19,405
2,951,873

5,654
1,933,668

2,177
1,480,878

1,001
2,043,594

679,762
14,712,829

321,428
603,470

155,333
1,027,913

96,121
1,291,605

61,097
1,836,799

22,789
1,589,809

15,989
2,383,443

3,721
1,274,120

1,690
1,178,727

1,594
3,526,943

627,875
11,590,048

249,542
390,258

104,548
705,222

110,374
1,542,760

117,264
3,560,715

33,939
2,263,935

9,463
1,344,217

1,725
586,269

667
463,703

353
742,969

954,627
4,187,740

750,261
977,871

115,619
752,689

55,756
734,980

24,254
703,687

5,498
372,499

2,630
384,044

484
160,249

102
66,660

23
35,061

1 Includes establishments that reported no workers in March 2001.
2 Includes data for unclassified establishments, not shown separately.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

5 to 9
workers

NOTE: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. Data reflect the movement of
Indian Tribal Council establishments from private industry to the public sector. See
Notes on Current Labor Statistics.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

83

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

19. Annual data: establishments, employment, and wages covered under Ul and UCFE by ownership
Year

Average
establishments

Average
annual
employment

Total annual wages
(in thousands)

Average annual
wages
per employee

Average
weekly
wage

Total covered (Ul and UCFE)

1992 .
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996 .
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000 .

2001 .

6,532,608
6,679,934
6.826.677
7.040.677
7,189,168
7,369,473
7,634,018
7,820,860
7,879,116
7,984,529

107,413,728
109,422,571
112,611,287
115,487,841
117,963,132
121,044,432
124,183,549
127,042,282
129,877,063
129,635,800

$2,781,676,477
2,884,472,282
3,033,676,678
3,215,921,236
3,414,514,808
3,674,031,718
3,967,072,423
4,235,579,204
4,587,708,584
4,695,225,123

$25,897
26,361
26,939
27,846
28,946
30,353
31,945
33,340
35,323
36,219

$498
507
518
536
557
584
614
641
679
697

$25,622
26,055
26,633
27,567
28,658
30,058
31,676
33,094
35,077
35,943

$493
501
512
530
551
578
609
636
675
691

$25,547
25,934
26,496
27,441
28,582
30,064
31,762
33,244
35,337
36,157

$491
499
510
528
550
578
611
639
680
695

$27,789
28,643
29,518
30,497
31,397
32,521
33,605
34,681
36,296
37,814

$534
551
568
586
604
625
646
667
698
727

$25,434
26,095
26,717
27,552
28,320
29,134
30,251
31,234
32,387
33,521

$489
502
514
530
545
560
582
601
623
645

$35,066
36.940
38,038
38,523
40,414
42,732
43,688
44,287
46,228
48.940

$674
710
731
741
777
822
840
852
889
941

Ul covered

1992.
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000 .
2001 .

6,485,473
6,632,221
6,778,300
6,990,594
7,137,644
7,317,363
7,586,767
7,771,198
7,828,861
7,933,536

104,288,324
106,351,431
109,588,189
112,539,795
115,081,246
118,233,942
121,400,660
124,255,714
127,005,574
126,883,182

$2,672,081,827
2,771,023,411
2,918,684,128
3,102,353,355
3,298,045,286
3,553,933,885
3,845,494,089
4,112,169,533
4,454,966,824
4,560,511,280

Private industry covered

1992 .
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999 .
2000 .
2001 .

6,308,719
6,454,381
6,596,158
6,803,454
6,946,858
7,121,182
7,381,518
7,560,567
7,622,274
7,724,965

89,349,803
91,202,971
94,146,344
96,894,844
99,268,446
102,175,161
105,082,368
107,619,457
110,015,333
109,304,802

$2,282,598,431
2,365,301,493
2,494,458,555
2.658.927.216
2.837.334.217
3,071,807,287
3,337,621,699
3,577,738,557
3,887,626,769
3,952,152,155

State government covered

1992.
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996 .
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000 .
2001 .

58,801
59,185
60,686
60,763
62,146
65,352
67,347
70,538
65,096
64,583

4,044,914
4,088,075
4,162,944
4,201,836
4,191,726
4,214,451
4,240,779
4,296,673
4,370,160
4,452,237

$112,405,340
117,095,062
122,879,977
128,143,491
131,605,800
137,057,432
142,512,445
149,011,194
158,618,365
168,358,331

Local government covered

1992.
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000 .
2001 .

117,923
118,626
121,425
126,342
128,640
130,829
137,902
140,093
141,491
143,989

10,892,697
11,059,500
11.278.080
11,442,238
11,621,074
11,844,330
12,077,513
12,339,584
12.620.081
13,126,143

$277,045,557
288,594,697
301,315,857
315,252,346
329,105,269
345,069,166
365,359,945
385,419,781
408,721,690
440,000,795

Federal Government covered (UCFE)

1992.
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000.
2001 .

47,136
47,714
48,377
50,083
51,524
52,110
47,252
49,661
50,256
50,993

3,125,404
3,071,140
3,023,098
2,948,046
2.881.887
2.810.489
2.782.888
2,786,567
2.871.489
2,752,619

$109,594,650
113,448,871
114,992,550
113,567,881
116,469,523
120,097,833
121,578,334
123,409,672
132,741,760
134,713,843

NOTE: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. Data reflect the movement of Indian Tribal Council establishments fromprivate industry to
the public sector. See Notes on Current Labor Statistics.
y

84

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

20. Annual data: establishments, employment, and wages covered under Ul and UCFE, by State
Average annual
employment

Average
establishments
State
2001

20002001
change

2001

Average weekly
wage

Total annual wages
(in thousands)

20002001
change

20002001
change

2001

20002001
change

2001

Total United States .......

7,984,529

154,540

129,635,800

-185,779

$4,695,225,123

$109,884,920

$697

$18

Alabama......................
Alaska........................
Arizona.......................
Arkansas .....................
California.....................

112,356
19,287
118,706
72,814
1,065,699

30
467
3,546
587
74,645

1,854,462
283,033
2,243,652
1,127,151
14,981,757

-23,500
7,479
22,942
-3,731
138,284

55,822,097
10,237,292
74,963,072
30,725,592
619,146,651

1,284,088
553,237
2,546,248
963,862
7,497,476

579
696
643
524
795

21
20
16
18
3

Colorado.....................
Connecticut..................
Delaware.....................
District of Columbia........
Florida........................

153,824
108,201
25,253
28,414
454,077

5,347
414
505
9
9,367

2,201,379
1,665,607
406,736
635,749
7,153,589

14,728
-9,121
482
-1,535
92,606

83,547,602
78,272,099
15,629,636
35,543,559
225,713,701

2,274,669
2,095,243
787,067
1,790,086
9,933,356

730
904
739
1,075
607

15
29
36
56
19

Georgia......................
Hawaii........................
Idaho..........................
Illinois.........................
Indiana.......................

230,232
35,439
46,480
319,588
151,376

5,219
1,412
1,084
-2,723
-1,328

3,871,763
557,146
571,314
5,886,248
2,871,236

-10,941
3,961
8,137
-54,259
-63,392

136,039,438
17,412,210
15,864,510
230,054,835
91,246,189

3,195,926
469,266
263,832
4,050,811
183,520

676
601
534
752
611

18
12
1
20
14

Iowa...........................
Kansas .......................
Kentucky.....................
Louisiana....................
Maine.........................

91,006
80,521
108,025
115,807
46,206

-5,825
52
302
-2,386
1,344

1,429,543
1,319,667
1,736,575
1,869,966
593,166

-13,432
5,984
-26,160
827
2,472

41,223,534
39,792,114
52,133,417
54,473,146
17,092,043

919,492
1,221,387
1,367,028
2,345,871
750,886

555
580
577
560
554

18
15
23
24
22

Maryland.....................
Massachusetts.............
Michigan .....................
Minnesota...................
Mississippi ..................

147,158
191,824
259,556
156,031
63,207

622
6,848
5,809
487
-748

2,421,899
3,276,224
4,476,659
2,609,669
1,111,255

16,392
21,104
-107,880
1,325
-25,520

92,644,873
147,348,234
167,385,129
95,479,188
28,806,869

5,096,016
3,574,494
-2,295,158
3,107,396
151,385

736
865
719
704
499

36
16
7
23
14

Missouri ......................
Montana......................
Nebraska....................
Nevada ......................
New Hampshire............

163,121
40,477
52,653
49,635
46,070

138
2,136
836
1,770
171

2,652,876
383,905
883,920
1,043,748
610,192

-23,960
4,862
1,516
25,919
3,685

86,009,694
9,672,371
25,083,293
34,569,506
21,650,267

2,000,438
472,112
646,745
1,717,063
582,754

623
485
546
637
682

19
18
13
16
14

New Jersey.................
New Mexico .................
New York....................
North Carolina..............
North Dakota................

256,536
48,439
538,898
224,426
23,326

-13,793
522
9,822
2,208
38

3,876,194
729,422
8,423,312
3,805,498
311,632

-1,221
12,293
-47,446
-57,272
2,412

171,793,642
20,935,825
393,598,666
121,866,007
8,011,085

2,443,618
1,216,191
9,383,346
1,858,872
378,510

852
552
899
616
494

12
23
27
19
19

Ohio ...........................
Oklahoma ...................
Oregon.......................
Pennsylvania ...............
Rhode Island................

285,567
90,603
111,073
331,405
33,636

4,705
1,574
2,150
16,187
311

5,434,769
1,463,622
1,596,753
5,552,366
468,952

-77,865
11,771
-11,175
-5,535
1,351

180,885,154
41,004,250
53,018,365
194,211,696
15,758,369

1,681,299
1,821,743
317,098
5,158,632
507,610

640
539
639
673
646

15
20
9
19
19

South Carolina.............
South Dakota...............
Tennessee ..................
Texas .........................
Utah ...........................

114,979
27,365
125,165
494,088
68,607

5,613
221
140
4,509
2,470

1,786,899
364,715
2,625,746
9,350,770
1,050,674

-33,210
598
-41,005
62,437
6,551

52,275,679
9,337,014
82,762,402
337,047,962
31,600,715

986,967
306,302
1,275,641
12,484,223
1,082,204

563
492
606
693
578

21
15
18
21
16

Vermont......................
Virginia.......................
Washington.................
West Virginia................
Wisconsin ...................
Wyoming.....................

24,156
195,639
221,450
46,620
148,227
21,288

287
3,048
1,775
-186
2,374
429

298,020
3,436,172
2,689,507
685,754
2,717,660
237,278

1,558
8,411
-14,921
-845
-18,388
6,446

9,011,468
126,222,350
100,746,663
19,187,832
85,713,725
6,654,092

439,492
5,662,779
413,740
726,836
1,733,629
459,596

581
706
720
538
607
539

25
30
7
21
17
23

Puerto Rico..................
Virgin Islands...............

51,733
3,236

-633
-17

1,007,919
44,330

-18,234
1,981

19,884,381
1,294,885

578,173
120,936

379
562

17
29

NOTE: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

85

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

21. Annual data: Employment and average annual pay for all workers
covered under Ul and UCFE in the 249 largest U.S. counties
Employment
County1
2001

United States4.

Percent
change,
2000-2001

.. 129,635,800

-.1

-

36,219

2.5

380,680
156,169
167,000
129,878
133,842
1,561,773
326,917
240,754
697,181
337,444

-1.0
1.3
-1.5
-.9
3.1
1.2
-.6
-.7
-.1
.7

197
54
212
192
16
61
170
175
135
80

35,453
37,089
29,502
29,979
37,998
35,689
30,690
32,261
46,489
44,744

4.2
3.5
3.1
3.8
3.7
1.6
5.1
4.7
3.1
5.7

Fresno, CA..........
Kern, CA..............
Los Angeles, CA....
Marin, CA............ .
Monterey, CA........
Orange, CA...........
Piacer, CA ...........
Riverside, CA........
Sacramento, CA....
San Bernardino, CA.

322,084
242,232
4,103,370
111,939
166,186
1,411,944
116,185
491,535
588,426
545,113

-.1
1.5
.6
1.3
.8
1.6
6.1
4.2
3.0
2.8

136
49
87
55
75
46
1
8
18
21

27,878
30,106
40,891
43,547
31,735
40,252
34,773
29,971
39,173
30,995

6.5
5.3
3.1
2.2
5.9
2.6
4.1
2.8
3.8
3.6

1,218,982
586,085
204,504
369,868
177,234
1,002,637
102,669
121,402
194,922
164,473

2.0
-3.3
1.9
.1
.8
-2.3
.9
3.0
2.1
2.2

37
246
39
120
76
233
64
19
32
30

38,418
61,068
30,818
62,288
33,626
65,931
35,022
33,496
36,145
29,591

2.3
6.1
5.3
-7.2
3.2
-13.5
-2.2
5.7
1.1
4.9

Tulare, CA ....
Ventura, CA ....
Adams, CO...
Arapahoe, CO.
Boulder, CO ....
Denver, CO...
El Paso, CO ....
Jefferson, CO .
Larimer, CO ....
Fairfield, CT ....

132,878
293,208
146,043
285,963
184,755
461,996
240,100
210,375
121,880
421,211

.0
1.5
.6
-.2
3.2
-.6
.9
.1
2.3
-1.0

130
50
88
144
13
171
65
121
29
198

24,732
37,783
34,753
44,999
44,310
46,134
34,391
37,819
33,248
63,163

4.2
1.9
4.0
-2.7
-2.8
4.0
4.1
4.5
2.6
3.3

Hartford, CT......
New Haven, CT ..
New London, CT.
New Castle, DE ..
Washington, DC .
Alachua, FL ......
Brevard, FL.......
Broward, FL......
Collier, FL........
Duval, FL.........

497,280
363,265
124,684
282,318
635,734
119,148
184,725
663,954
110,230
436,663

-.5
-1.1
1.6
.2
-.2
.7
1.7
2.1
5.9
1.8

163
201
47
112
145
81
43
33
2
41

45,050
39,483
38,505
42,849
55,909
26,917
32,798
33,966
30,839
33,721

3.2
2.9
4.8
5.8
5.6
2.9
2.2
2.2
2.9
2.9

Escambia, FL...
Hillsborough, FL
Lee, FL ...........
Leon, FL.........
Manatee, FL ....
Miami-Dade, FL .
Orange, FL ......
Palm Beach, FL .
Pinellas, FL......
Polk, FL ..........

121,285
595,768
171,902
142,981
118,788
993,834
602,668
499,688
448,788
184,471

.8
1.8
4.5
.9
5.2
1.6
.2
3.9
3.3
.1

77
42
5
66
4
48
113
9
12
122

28,610
32,874
29,432
30,287
26,629
34,524
32,218
35,957
31,742
28,890

7.1
3.7
4.6
3.5
4.4
3.6
3.5
2.1
1.5
3.6

Sarasota, FL ...
Seminole, FL ..
Volusia, FL....
Chatham, GA ..
Clayton, GA ....
Cobb, GA......
Dekalb, GA...
Fulton, GA ....
Gwinnett, GA ..
Richmond, GA

147,206
145,147
142,478
122,608
114,982
301,520
305,903
754,870
289,538
104,694

4.5
2.2
-.2
-.2
-.3
-.1
-.7
.1
2.9
-.9

6
31
146
147
151
137
176
123
20
193

29,030
31,951
26,064
30,549
38,301
40,174
39,648
47,761
39,405
29,431

1.9
3.6
3.9
3.0
4.2
3.6
2.7
1.5
.9
2.9

.
.

See footnotes at end of table.

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2001

Jefferson, AL.....
Madison, AL.......
Mobile, AL.........
Montgomery, AL ..
Anchorage, AK ....
Maricopa, AZ.....
Pima, AZ...........
Pulaski, AR.......
Alameda, CA.....
Contra Costa, CA

San Diego, CA.....
San Francisco, CA.
San Joaquin, CA....
San Mateo, CA....
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Clara, CA...
Santa Cruz, CA....
Solano, CA.........
Sonoma, CA.......
Stanislaus, CA.....

86

Percent
change,
2000-20012

Average annual pay
Ranked by
percent
change,
2000-20013

January 2004


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

21. Continued— Annual data: Employment and average annual pay for
all workers covered under Ul and UCFE in the 249 largest U.S.
counties
Average annual pay

Employment
County1
2001

Percent
change,
2000-20012

Ranked by
percent
change,
2000-20013

Percent
change,
2000-20012

2001

Honolulu, HI.................
Ada, ID........................
Cook, IL... ...................
Du Page, IL .................
Kane, ÏL......................
Lake, IL.... ..................
Peoria, IL.....................
Sangamon, IL...............
Will, IL.........................
Winnebago, IL..............

409,669
182,309
2,630,768
580,938
194,374
316,150
102,764
145,195
145,570
139,815

.4
2.7
-1.5
-.2
-.1
-.3
-1.8
.2
.1
-2.9

99
23
213
148
138
152
223
114
124
241

32,531
33,081
44,108
43,470
33,362
43,970
33,288
36,259
34,280
31,951

2.1
-4.0
2.8
2.1
3.7
3.2
6.1
4.3
6.1
1.4

Allen, IN......................
Elkhart, IN....................
Lake,IN ......................
Marion, IN....................
St. Joseph, IN...............
Vanderburgh, IN ...........
Linn, IA .......................
Polk, IA.......................
Johnson, KS .................
Sedgwick, KS ...............

183,329
113,524
194,624
591,406
124,967
109,418
119,914
263,469
292,984
249,863

-2.3
-6.8
-1.9
-1.3
-3.1
.1
-1.7
-.2
2.4
.1

234
249
226
210
244
125
219
149
27
126

32,830
30,797
32,017
37,885
30,769
30,494
34,649
34,944
37,204
33,937

1.7
1.5
1.4
3.8
3.7
3.1
1.6
3.8
-.1
3.8

Shawnee, KS................
Fayette, KY..................
Jefferson, KY................
Caddo, LA....................
East Baton Rouge, LA....
Jefferson, LA................
Lafayette, LA................
Orleans, LA..................
Cumberland, ME...........
Anne Arundel, MD .........

100,462
167,714
431,347
120,877
243,392
213,911
119,294
263,427
168,147
200,174

.3
-2.4
-1.7
1.3
-1.1
-.4
4.5
.1
1.3
2.8

105
237
220
56
202
160
7
127
57
22

30,513
32,237
34,688
29,354
30,397
29,326
32,364
32,880
32,327
37,190

3.9
5.0
4.1
2.0
3.9
4.6
8.2
3.7
5.1
4.9

Baltimore, MD...............
Howard, MD.................
Montgomery, MD...........
Prince Georges, MD.......
Baltimore City, MD.........
Bristol, MA ...................
Essex, MA ...................
Hampden, MA...............
Middlesex, MA..............
Norfolk, MA..................

360,128
132,935
449,881
304,022
381,155
218,818
306,111
204,824
850,295
327,067

.2
1.3
.9
.5
.4
-1.1
.2
.9
1.4
.7

115
58
67
94
100
203
116
68
52
82

36,240
40,191
45,893
38,986
40,508
32,012
39,242
33,357
51,734
44,173

6.2
6.1
5.0
5.2
5.0
4.1
.5
3.6
.0
2.2

Plymouth, MA...............
Suffolk, MA ................
Worcester, MA..............
Genesee, Ml.................
Ingham, Ml...................
Kalamazoo, Ml..............
Kent, Ml ......................
Macomb, Ml.................
Oakland, Ml .................
Ottawa, Ml ...................
Washtenaw, Ml.............
Wayne, Ml ...................
Anoka, MN...................
Dakota, MN..................
Hennepin, MN...............
Ramsey, MM.................
Hinds, MS ...................
Greene, MO.................
Jackson, MD.................
St. Louis, MO................

166,471
602,983
321,044
160,442
174,290
116,728
339,510
326,600
755,451
115,880

.8
.1
.3
-3.0
-.3
-1.7
-1.8
-3.2
-1.4
-2.5

34,929
58,906
37,299
35,995
35,753
33,908
34,570
40,481
45,038
32,246

3.4
4.0
-.9
-.9
2.3
3.8
1.7
-1.0
1.2
.9

195,562
848,463
109,521
155,662
863,674
333,380
134,285
140,739
384,942
641,151

.2
-2.4
-.3
1.3
-.8
.0
-.9
-.9
-2.3
-.8

78
128
106
242
153
221
224
245
211
239
117
238
154
59
186
131
194
195
235
187

40,249
42,968
34,585
35,683
45,495
40,400
31,138
28,065
37,405
38,929

.2
1.2
1.9
3.8
3.8
3.4
1.8
4.1
3.7
2.1

St. Louis City, MO.........
Douglas, NF ................
Lancaster, NE..............
Clark, NV ....................
Washoe, NV ................

245,192
325,629
148,200
720,184
193,571
192,712
130,917
141,240
453,626
187,398

-2.2
-.7
.9
3.2
2.4
.0
.7
.9
1.5
3.6

231
177
69
14
28
132
83
70
51
11

40,834
32,866
29,352
32,648
34,231
39,320
36,642
32,555
46,828
38,776

5.8
1.6
2.9
1.6
4.5
.3
2.3
4.8
1.1
3.1

Burlington, NJ..............
See footnotes at end of table.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

87

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

21. Continued— Annual data: Employment and average annual pay for
all workers covered under Ul and UCFE in the 249 largest U.S.
counties
Employment
County1
2001

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Percent
change,
2000-20012

2001

Percent
change,
2000-2001

Camden, NJ.................
Essex, NJ ....................
Hudson, NJ..................
Mercer, NJ ...................
Middlesex, NJ...............
Monmouth, NJ ..............
Morris, NJ ....................
Ocean, NJ....................
Passaic, NJ..................
Somerset, NJ................

199,869
361,569
237,253
215,524
399,332
240,757
277,653
133,657
175,108
176,713

.5
-.5
.0
2.6
1.3
3.2
.4
3.7
-1.1
1.7

95
164
133
25
60
15
101
10
204
44

36,530
46,526
47,638
46,831
47,726
40,399
53,829
31,034
39,192
55,769

4.0
4.2
.4
4.9
2.7
1.8
-11.0
1.9
3.8
1.8

Union, NJ.....................
Bernalillo, NM ...............
Albany, NY...................
Bronx, NY....................
Dutchess, NY................
Erie, NY......................
Kings, NY.....................
Monroe, NY .................
Nassau, NY .................
New York, NY...............

236,609
309,166
229,957
214,227
112,912
454,839
439,343
393,783
593,368
2,342,338

-.1
.7
-.5
.4
2.5
-1.1
-.1
-.7
-.8
-1.5

139
84
165
102
26
205
140
178
188
214

46,204
31,663
37,848
34,248
38,748
32,103
31,952
36,597
40,599
74,883

2.0
4.9
5.7
4.3
7.4
1.9
3.9
3.3
1.4
3.2

Oneida, NY..................
Onondaga, NY..............
Orange, NY..................
Queens, NY.................
Rockland, NY................
Suffolk, NY...................
Westchester, NY...........
Buncombe, NC .............
Cumberland, NC...........
Durham, NC.................

108,686
249,754
120,903
478,661
107,348
581,938
404,974
105,378
106,381
169,609

-1.8
-1.1
.7
-.7
.4
.1
-.4
-.3
-2.8
.3

225
206
85
179
103
129
161
155
240
107

28,381
33,469
30,218
36,963
38,720
38,706
48,716
28,701
26,981
48,076

4.0
3.0
2.9
5.7
3.9
2.2
3.5
3.8
3.3
-2.6

Forsyth, NC .................
Guilford, NC.................
Mecklenburg, NC...........
Wake, NC ....................
Butler, OH....................
Cuyahoga, OH..............
Franklin, OH .................
Hamilton, OH................
Lorain, OH ...................
Lucas, OH....................

180,155
274,077
514,036
385,777
126,863
796,353
702,628
559,852
103,115
234,678

-.7
-2.0
.3
.9
-.5
-1.6
.2
-1.1
-3.5
-1.7

180
229
108
71
166
217
118
207
247
222

34,693
33,217
41,775
36,996
32,325
37,533
36,090
38,339
32,194
33,088

2.0
3.1
3.1
4.6
2.6
2.8
3.2
2.0
.6
2.6

Mahoning, OH ..............
Montgomery, OH ...........
Stark, OH.....................
Summit, OH.................
Oklahoma, OK..............
Tulsa, OK.....................
Clackamas, OR ............
Lane, OR .....................
Marion, OR ..................
Multnomah, OR ............

108,769
298,982
173,888
261,098
415,507
342,502
133,997
137,574
126,999
444,393

-3.7
-1.5
-1.6
-2.1
.4
.6
-.2
-1.9
-.6
-1.1

248
215
218
230
104
89
150
227
172
208

26,860
34,783
29,197
33,416
30,161
32,771
33,699
28,983
28,785
37,668

3.5
.7
2.4
2.1
3.2
5.2
3.7
4.0
2.4
2.4

Washington, OR ............
Allegheny, PA...............
Berks, PA.....................
Bucks, PA....................
Chester, PA.................
Cumberland, PA...........
Dauphin, PA ................
Delaware, PA................
Erie, PA ......................
Lancaster, PA...............

228,453
711,532
165,263
246,491
217,148
122,649
173,292
214,106
128,893
218,415

1.4
.3
-.7
.6
.6
-.6
.3
1.0
-2.3
-.3

53
109
181
90
91
173
110
63
236
156

42,222
38,086
32,807
35,239
44,216
33,996
34,855
38,494
29,293
31,493

-5.0
3.7
2.5
3.5
1.0
3.6
3.5
4.5
3.3
2.2

Lehigh, PA...................
Luzerne, PA.................
Montgomery, PA...........
Philadelphia, PA...........
Westmoreland, PA.........
York, PA .....................
Providence, Rl..............
Charleston, SC.............
Greenville, SC ..............
Richland, SC.................

172,860
141,944
485,822
658,827
134,128
165,879
288,650
180,711
226,362
205,841

.2
-.8
.5
-.7
-.4
-1.0
-.7
-1.0
-3.0
-.5

119
189
96
182
162
199
183
200
243
167

35,564
28,924
44,366
40,813
28,827
31,936
34,566
29,013
32,622
30,591

.8
3.8
1.3
2.8
3.0
3.3
3.5
4.8
4.3
3.3

See footnotes at end of table.

88

Average annual pay
Ranked by
percent
change,
2000-20013

January 2004


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

21. Continued—Annual data: Employment and average annual pay for
all workers covered under Ul and UCFE in the 249 largest U.S.
counties
Average annual pay

Employment
County1
2001

Spartanburg, SC............
Minnehaha, SD.............
Davidson, 7N................
Hamilton, TN.................
Knox, TN.....................
Shelby, TN...................
Bexar, TX.....................
Cameron, TX................
Collin, TX.....................
Dallas, TX....................

117,262
106,717
434,006
187,724
203,470
496,647
655,195
111,374
181,007
1,550,835

Denton, TX....................
El Paso, TX..................
Harris, TX ....................
Hidalgo, TX..................
Jefferson, TX................
Lubbock, TX .................
Nueces, TX..................
Tarrant, TX ..................
Travis, TX....................
Salt Lake, UT................

122,552
248,407
1,864,100
168,610
118,764
118,042
143,470
709,162
534,861
530,497

Utah, UT......................
Arlington, VA.................
Chesterfield, VA............
Fairfax, VA...................
Henrico, VA .................
Norfolk, VA ..................
Richmond, VA...............
Virginia Beach, VA.........
Clark, WA ....................
King, WA......................

143,423
159,170
107,721
542,984
169,827
146,414
164,906
166,007
114,716
1,146,191

Pierce, WA...................
Snohomish, WA............
Spokane, WA................
Kanawha, WV...............
Brown, Wl ....................
Dane, Wl .....................
Milwaukee, Wl ..............
Waukeshci, Wl..............

238,600
209,657
190,057
111,552
141,950
279,208
522,022
224,721

San Juan, PR ...............

324,791

Percent
change,
2000-20012

Percent
change,
2000-20012

31,856
29,205
35,509
31,240
30,765
35,791
31,032
22,142
41,338
44,909

4.1
3.5
1.9

73
209
45
17
228
35

30,788
25,847
43,751
22,313
32,570
26,577
29,406
37,287
41,698
33,210

5.1
3.1
4.5

143
24
38
79
185
74
36
196

28,266
55,390
32,957
52,641
37,869
33,504
40,173
26,750
33,125
47,186

1.3
4.8
3.4

31,261
36,388
29,310
31,601
32,631
34,097
35,736
37,092

4.7
3.6

-.8
.6

216
158
134
190
159
40
191
93

-.5

169

22,179

1 .1
-.1

-.3
.6

-.5
.9
2 .1

5.7
-.6

.9
- 1 .2
1.7
3.1
-1.9
2 .1

.7
.5
-.7
-.1

.5
.3
- .1

2.7
2 .0
.8

-.7
.9
2 .1

-.9
-1.5

3 Rankings for percent change in
employment are based on the 249 counties that
are comparable over the year.

2001

232
62
141
157
92
168
72
34
3
174

-2 . 2

1 Includes areas not officially designated as
counties. See Notes on Current Labor
Statistics.
2 Percent changes were computed from
annual employment and pay data adjusted for
noneconomic county reclassifications. See
Notes on Current Labor Statistics.

Ranked by
percent
change,
2000-20013

-.3
.0
-.8
-.3

1.9

86

97
184
142
98
111

2 .2
2 .2

4.2
3.7
2.7
2 .0
1 .2

2 .8

4.1
1 .1

4.3
5.2
.9
3.2

2 .1

4.8
4.1
4.0
5.3
3.0
- .6

-1.5
4.8
3.5
3.9
2.9
3.7
4.1

4
Totals for the United States do not include
data for Puerto Rico.
Note: Data pertain to workers covered by
Unemployment
Insurance
(Ul)
and
Unemployment Compensation for Federal
Employees (UCFE) programs. The 248 U.S.
counties comprise 66.2 percent of the total
covered workers in the United States.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

89

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

22. Annual data: Employment status of the population
[Numbers in thousands]
E m plo ym ent status

1993

1995

1996

19971

19981

19991

20001

2001

2002

Civilian noninstitutional population...........

194,838

196,814

198,584

200,591

203,133

205,220

Civilian labor force.................................

207,753

212,577

215,092

129,200

217,570

131,056

132,304

133,943

136,297

137,673

139,368

142,583

143,734

144,863

1

19941

Labor force participation rate...............

66.3

6 6 .6

6 6 .6

6 6 .8

67.1

67.1

67.1

Employed.............................................

67.1

6 6 .8

6 6 .6

120,259

123,060

124,900

126,708

129,558

131,463

133,488

Employment-population ratio.........

136,891

136,933

61.7

136,485

62.5

62.9

63.2

63.8

64.1

64.3

Unemployed........................................

64.4

63.7

62.7

8,940

7,996

7,404

7,236

6,739

6 ,2 1 0

5,880

5,692

6,801

8,378

Unemployment rate.........................

6.9

Not in the labor force................................

65,638

5.6

5.4

4.9

4.5

4.2

4.0

4.7

5.8

66,280

66,647

66,836

67,547

68,385

69,994

71,359

72,707

6 .1

65,758

Not strictly comparable with prior years.

23. Annual data: Employment levels by industry
[In thousands]
Industry

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Total private employment...............

91,855

95,016

97,866

100,169

103,113

106,021

108,686

110,996

110,707

108,886

Total nonfarm employment............
Qoods-produclng..........................

110,844
22,219

Natural resources and mining..
Construction.............................. .

666

114,291
22,774
659
5,095
17,021

117,298
23,156
641

119,708
23,410
637

122,770
23,886
654

5,274
17,241

5,536
17,237

5,813
17,419

125,930
24,354
645
6,149
17,560

128,993
24,465
598
6,545
17,322

131,785
24,649
599
6,787

131,826
23,873
606
6,826
16,441

130,376
22,619
581
6,732
15,306

72,242
23,128

74,710
23,834
5,433.1
13,896.7
3,837.8

76,759
24,239
5,522.0
14,142.5
3,935.3

79,227
24,700
5,663.9
14,388.9
4,026.5

81,667

666.2

639.6
2,940
6,969
13,462

620.9
3,084

84,221
25,771
5,892.5
14,970.1
4,300.3
608.5
3,419
7,648
15,957
14,798

86,346
26,225
5.933.2
15,279.8
4.410.3
601.3
3,631
7,687
16,666
15,109
11,862

86,834
25,983
5,772.7
15,238.6
4,372.0
599.4

86,267
25,493
5,641.0
15,047.2
4,205.3
599.8
3,420
7,843
16,010
16,184

5,168

3,629
7,807
16,476
15,645
12,036
5,258

11,969
5,348

20,790

21,118

21,489

4,779
16,744

Manufacturing............................
Private service-providing.......................

69,636

Trade, transportation, and utilities.....
Wholesale trade.................................
Retail trade.........................................
Transportation and warehousing....
Utilities.................................................
Information............................................

22,378
5,093.2
13,020.5
3,553.8
710.7

Financial activities...............................

6,709
11,495

Professional and business services..
Education and health services.........
Leisure and hospitality........................
Other services.....................................
Government.,

2,668

12,303
9,732
4,350

5,247.3
13,490.8
3,701.0
689.3
2,738
6,867
12,174
12,807

18,989

2,843
6,827
12,844
13,289

4,428

10,501
4,572

13,683
10,777
4,690

7,178
14,335
14,087
11,018
4,825

19,275

19,432

19,539

19,664

10,100

NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American
system. NAiCS-based data by industry are not comparable with SIC-based data.

90

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

25,186
5,795.2
14,609.3
4,168.0
613.4
3,218
7,462
15,147
14,446
11,232
4,976

11,543
5,087

19,909

20,307

17,263

Industry Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
See "Notes on the data" for a description of the most recent benchmark revision.

24.

Annual data: Average hours and earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on nonfarm
payrolls, by industry
Industry

1993

1994

1995

1997

1996

1998

1999

2001

2000

Private sector:

2002

34.3
11.03
378.40

34.5
11.32
390.73

34.3
11.64
399.53

34.3
12.03
412.74

34.5
12.49
431.25

34.5
13.00
448.04

34.3
13.47
462.49

34.3
14.00
480.41

34.0
14.53
493.20

33.9
14.95
506.22

40.6
12.28
498.82

41.1
12.63
519.58

40.8
12.96
528.62

40.8
13.38
546.48

41.1
13.82
568.43

40.8
14.23
580.99

40.8
14.71
599.99

40.7
15.27
621.86

39.9
15.78
630.04

39.9
16.33
651.60

44.9
14.12
634.77

45.3
14.41
653.14

45.3
14.78
670.32

46.0
15.10
695.07

46.2
15.57
720.11

44.9
16.20
727.28

44.2
16.33
721.74

44.4
16.55
734.92

44.6
17.00
757.92

43.2
17.22
743.11

38.4
14.04
539.81

38.8
14.38
558.53

38.8
14.73
571.57

38.9
15.11
588.48

38.9
15.67
609.48

38.8
16.23
629.75

39.0
16.80
655.11

39.2
17.48
685.78

38.7
18.00
695.89

38.4
18.51
711.61

41.1
11.70
480.80

41.7
12.04
502.12

41.3
12.34
509.26

41.3
12.75
526.55

41.7
13.14
548.22

41.4
13.45
557.12

41.4
13.85
573.17

41.3
14.32
590.65

40.3
14.76
595.19

40.5
15.29
618.87

32.5
10.60
345.03

32.7
10.87
354.97

32.6
11.19
364.14

32.6
11.57
376.72

32.8
12.05
394.77

32.8
12.59
412.78

32.7
13.07
427.30

32.7
13.60
445.00

32.5
14.16
460.32

32.5
14.56
473.10

34.1
10.55
359.33

34.3
10.80
370.38

34.1

34.3
11.90
407.57

12.39
423.30

33.9
12.82
434.31

33.8

378.79

34.1
11.46
390.64

34.2

1 1 .1 0

13.31
449.88

33.5
13.70
459.53

33.6
14.02
471.09

38.5
12.57
484.46

38.8
12.93
501.17

38.6
13.34
515.14

38.6
13.80
533.29

38.8
14.41
559.39

38.6
15.07
582.21

38.6
15.62
602.77

38.8
16.28
631.40

38.4
16.77
643.45

38.0
16.97
643.99

30.7
8.36
484.46

30.9
8.61
501.17

30.8
8.85
515.14

30.7
9.21
533.29

30.9
9.59
559.39

30.9
10.05
582.21

30.8
10.45
602.77

30.7
1 0 .8 6

631.40

30.7
11.29
643.45

30.9
11.67
643.99

38.9
12.71
494.36

39.5
12.84
507.27

38.9
13.18
513.37

39.1
13.45
525.60

39.4
13.78
542.55

38.7
14.12
546.86

37.6
14.55
547.97

37.4
15.05
562.31

36.7
15.33
562.70

36.8
15.77
580.68

42.1
17.95
756.35

42.3
18.66
789.98

42.3
19.19
811.52

42.0
19.78
830.74

42.0
20.59
865.26

42.0
21.48
902.94

42.0
22.03
924.59

42.0
22.75
955.66

41.4
23.58
977.18

40.9
23.94
978.44

36.0
14.86
535.25

36.0
15.32
551.28

36.0
15.68
564.98

36.4
16.30
592.68

36.3
17.14
622.40

36.6
17.67
646.52

36.7
18.40
675.32

36.8
19.07
700.89

36.9
19.80
731.11

36.5
20.23
739.41

35.5
11.36
403.02

35.5
11.82
419.20

35.5
12.28
436.12

35.5
12.71
451.49

35.7
13.22
472.37

36.0
13.93
500.95

35.8
14.47
517.57

35.9
14.98
537.37

35.8
15.59
558.02

35.6
16.17
575.43

34.0
11.96
406.20

34.1
12.15
414.16

34.0
12.53
426.44

34.1
13.00
442.81

34.3
13.57
465.51

34.3
14.27
490.00

34.4
14.85
510.99

34.5
15.52
535.07

34.2
16.33
557.84

34.2
16.81
574.59

32.0
359.08

32.0
11.50
368.14

32.0
11.80
377.73

31.9
12.17
388.27

32.2
12.56
404.65

32.2
13.00
418.82

32.1
13.44
431.35

32.2
13.95
449.25

32.3
14.64
473.39

32.4
15.22
493.02

25.9
6.32
163.45

26.0
6.46
168.00

25.5
6.62
171.42

25.9
6.82
176.46

26.0
7.13
185.81

26.2
7.48
195.82

26.1
7.76
202.87

26.1
211.76

25.8
8.35
215.19

25.8
8.57
221.15

32.6
9.90
322.65

32.7
10.16
332.44

32.6
10.51
342.36

32.6
1 0 .8 6

32.7
11.29
368.6C

32.6
11.79
384.26

32.5
12.26
398.7“

32.6
12.7C
413.41

32.C
13.27
428.64

32.0
13.72
439.65

Goods-producing:

Natural resources and mining

Construction:

Manufacturing:

Private service-providing:

Trade, transportation, and utilities:

Wholesale trade:

Retail trade:

Transportation and warehousing:

Utilities:

Information:

Financial activities:

Professional and business services:

Education and health services:
1 1 .2 1

Leisure and hospitality:
8 .1 1

Other services:

352.62
Average weekly earnings (in dollars)............
NOTE: Data reflect the conversion to the 2002 version of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) system. NAiCS-based data by industry are not comparable with SIC-based data.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

91

Current Labor Statistics: Compensation & Industrial Relations

25.

Employment Cost Index, compensation,1 by occupation and industry group

[June 1989 = 100]

2001
Series

Sept.

2002

Dec.

Mar.

June

2003

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

P ercent change
Sept.

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Sept. 2003

Civilian workers2.

155.6

156.8

158.4

159.9

161.3

162.2

164.5

165.8

167.6

157.7
156.7
159.6
158.8
151.1
155.0

158.9
157.5
161.2
160.0
152.0
156.9

160.5
158.5
163.7
162.0
153.7
158.4

162.1
159.3
165.6
163.3
155.1
159.4

163.5
161.4
166.3
164.9
156.4
161.3

164.3
162.4
166.7
166.1
157.5
162.2

166.7
164.1
171.1
168.3
159.8
164.1

167.S
165.C
172.C
170.0
161.4
165.0

169.9
167.0
174.0
171.7
162.9
166.8

153.2
153.3
156.4
158.1
156.7
158.2
156.1

154.4
154.6
157.6
159.0
158.3
160.0
156.6

156.3
156.6
159.1
160.2
160.5
162.3
157.1

157.7
158.1
160.7
161.1
161.8
163.8
157.4

158.7
159.1
162.2
163.2
163.1
165.7
161.6

169.2
160.5
162.8
163.9
164.5
167.6
162.8

163.1
164.0
165.0
165.3
166.4
169.9
163.6

164.6
165.4
166.2
166.3
167.6
170.8
164.2

165.8
166.5
168.2
168.5
169.3
173.1
166.9

1 .6

153.8

155.2

156.5

157.5

160.2

161.7

163.4

164.3

167.3

1 .8

4.4

156.0

157.2

158.7

160.2

161.7

162.4

164.5

165.8

167.8

1 .2

3.8

155.9
156.0

157.2
157.2

158.9
159.0

160.7
160.5

161.6
161.6

162.3
162.4

165.0
165.1

166.4
166.6

168.1
168.1

1 .0

4.0

.9

4.0

158.7
159.6
159.2
160.2
155.0
159.5
151.0
151.8
150.4
145.6
154.9

160.1
160.9
160.3
161.8
156.7
160.8
151.9
152.5
151.5
146.3
156.5

161.9
162.8
161.5
164.4
157.7
162.8
153.6
153.7
153.6
148.7
158.7

163.8
164.3
162.5
166.6
161.6
164.2
155.1
155.7
154.7
149.6
159.9

164.6
165.3
163.6
167.0
161.6
165.6
156.3
156.9
155.4
151.0
161.4

165.2
165.9
164.4
167.2
161.9
166.7
157.3
157.8
156.7
151.8
162.9

168.1
169.1
166.5
172.1
163.5
169.0
159.7
160.0
159.9
153.2
164.9

169.4
170.4
167.7
173.1
165.1
170.9
161.4
162.0
161.1
155.1
166.8

171.2
172.1
169.4
175.0
167.2
172.3
162.8
163.1
162.6
156.7
168.6

3.9

Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers.................................................
Professional specialty and technical..........................
Executive, adminitrative, and managerial....................
Administrative support, including clerical.....................
Blue-collar workers..................................................
Service occupations.................................................
Workers, by industry division:
Goods-producing.....................................................
Manufacturing.......................................................
Service-producing....................................................
Services...............................................................
Health services....................................................
Hospitals..........................................................
Educational services.............................................
Public administration3..............................................
Nonmanufacturing...................................................
Private industry workers...........................................
Excluding sales occupations...................................
Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers...............................................
Excluding sales occupations.................................
Professional specialty and technical occupations........
Executive, adminitrative, and managerial occupations..
Sales occupations................................................
Administrative support occupations, including clerical...
Blue-collar workers................................................
Precision production, craft, and repair occupations......
Machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors.........
Transportation and material moving occupations........
Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and laborers....
Service occupations...............................................
Production and nonsupervisory occupations4..............

152.6

154.8

156.4

157.4

159.0

159.8

161.7

162.6

163.8

.7

3.0

154.3

155.5

157.1

158.7

159.7

160.5

162.6

164.1

165.7

1 .0

3.8

Workers, by industry division:
Goods-producing...................................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
White-collar occupations.......................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Blue-collar occupations.......................................
Construction........................................................
Manufacturing.....................................................
White-collar occupations.......................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Blue-collar occupations....................................... .
Durables.............................................................
Nondurables........................................................

153.1
152.5
156.8
155.3
150.8
151.7
153.3
156.0
153.8
151.3
154.0
152.0

154.4
153.7
158.1
156.5
151.9
153.0
154.6
156.9
154.7
152.7
155.3
153.2

156.2
155.5
160.1
158.4
153.6
154.1
156.6
159.1
156.7
154.6
156.9
156.0

157.6
156.9
161.9
160.2
154.8
155.2
158.1
161.1
158.6
155.8
158.3
157.5

158.6
157.9
162.9
161.1
155.9
156.3
159.1
162.2
159.6
156.7
158.9
159.2

160.1
159.2
164.3
162.3
157.3
157.9
160.5
163.3
160.7
158.3
160.6
160.3

163.0
162.4
167.8
166.3
159.9
159.1
164.0
167.1
165.1
161.6
164.4
163.1

164.5
163.8
169.2
167.5
161.5
161.1
165.4
168.7
166.4
162.8
165.5
164.9

165.7
165.0
170.1
168.5
162.9
162.3
166.5
169.5
167.4
164.1
166.6
166.0

.7
.7
.5

4.5
4.5
4.4
4.5
4.5
3.8
4.7
4.5
4.9
4.7
4.8
4.3

156.9
157.8
159.0
160.9
150.9
152.2
153.5
148.2
160.7
162.8
158.1
153.7
155.4
158.6
160.0
150.9
149.7
149.7

158.2
159.0
160.3
162.2
151.4
154.2
155.5
151.1
161.5
163.4
159.1
155.5
157.1
159.5
160.6
153.2
150.9
151.7

159.9
160.9
162.1
164.1
153.2
155.9
157.3
152.5
163.9
166.0
161.3
156.5
157.5
161.9
162.3
153.5
152.4
152.9

161.8
162.4
164.0
165.6
155.2
157.0
158.9
153.9
165.5
166.1
164.8
159.5
160.0
166.3
164.4
155.6
154.2
154.5

162.7
163.5
164.7
166.5
156.6
158.5
160.8
155.4
168.2
169.0
167.2
159.6
160.3
165.9
166.1
156.0
156.1
156.3

163.1
164.0
165.1
167.0
156.9
159.3
161.7
156.1
169.2
170.1
168.1
159.7
160.4
166.7
167.2
155.8
155.1
156.3

165.6
166.6
167.9
169.9
158.7
161.1
163.2
157.8
170.5
171.3
169.5
161.3
161.8
169.5
168.4
156.6
156.4
157.5

167.0
168.0
169.2
171.3
160.8
162.0
165.4
158.9
174.2
175.5
172.6
162.5
162.7
171.3
169.9
157.4
159.2
158.6 1

168.8
169.7
171.2
173.1
162.2
163.2
166.5
159.4
176.4
178.4
173.8
164.3
165.0
172.0
171.2
159.9
161.2
159.3

Service-producing...................................................
Excluding sales occupations.............................. .
White-collar occupations.......................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Blue-collar occupations........................................
Service occupations.............................................
Transportation and public utilities.............................
Transportation....................................................
Public utilities.....................................................
Communications..............................................
Electric, gas, and sanitary services......................
Wholesale and retail trade.....................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Wholesale trade.................................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Retail trade........................................................
General merchandise stores...............................
Food stores............
See footnotes at end of table.

92

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

1 .2
1 .2
1 .2
1 .0

.9
1 .1

.7
.7
1 .2

1.3
1 .0

1.3

1 .1
1 .0
1 .0
1 .1

1.3
.8

.9
.7
.9
1 .0
1 .1

.6

.9
.7
.7
.5
.6
.8

.7
.7
1 .1
1 .0
1 .2
1 .1

.9
.7
.7
.3
1.3
1.7
.7
1.1

1.4
.4
.8
1 .6

1.3
.4 1

3.9
3.5
4.6
4.1
4.2
3.4

4.5
4.7
3.7
3.2
3.8
4.5
3.3

4.0
4.1
3.5
4.8
3.5
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.6
3.8
4.5

3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
3.6
3.0
3.5
2 .6

4.9
5.6
3.9
2.9
2.9
3.7
3.1
2.5
3.3
1.9

25. Continued— Employment Cost Index, compensation,' by occupation and industry group
[June 1989 = 100]

Series

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

P ercent change

2002

2002

2001

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Sept. 2003
7.3

Finance, insurance, and real estate..... ............................

160.9

161,3

165.2

167.3

168.0

168.5

176.7

178.3

180.2

Excluding sales occupations........................................
Banking, savings and loan, and other credit agencies.
Insurance.............................................................................
Services.................................................................................
Business services..............................................................
Health services...................................... .............................
Hospitals............................................................................
Educational services..........................................................
Colleges and universities...............................................

164.7
175.4
159.9
160.0
165.2
156.8
158.4
166.4
166.2

165.0
174.5
161.3
161.0
166.2
158.4
160.3
167.6
167.5

169.8
182.1
164.0
162.6
166.3
160.6
162.8
168.5
168.1

171.3
184.2
166.1
163.7
166.6
162.0
164.5
169.0
168.4

172.1
184.6
167.1
164.9
167.2
163.2
166.2
173.5
172.0

173.1
185.3
167.9
165.4
167.5
164.4
168.1
175.2
173.7

182.0
204.3
172.1
167.1
168.5
166.5
170.8
176.3
174.5

184.0
206.3
173.9
168.4
169.2
167.9
171.9
177.1
175.4

1,853.0
207.6
175.1
170.4
171.9
169.4
173.9
180.2
178.4

Nonmanufacturing................................................................

156.3

157.6

159.3

161.1

162.0

162.5

164.9

166.4

168.1

White-collar workers..........................................................
Excluding sales occupations........................................
Blue-collar occupations.....................................................
Service occupations..........................................................

159.0
160.9
150.2
152.1

160.5
162.3
150.6
154.1

162.2
164.2
152.2
155.9

164.1
165.7
154.0
156.9

164.8
166.6
155.4
158.4

165.3
167.1
155.9
159.2

168.0
170.0
157.5
161.1

169.3
171.4
159.7
162.0

171.2
173.2
161.1
163.2

1 .1

.9
.7

3.9
4.0
3.7
3.0

State and local government workers...................................

154.3

155.2

156.1

156.7

160.1

161.5

162.6

163.2

165.9

1.7

3.6

153.7
152.8
156.4
154.2
151.5

154.4
153.2
157.6
155.6
153.2

155.2
153.6
159.5
156.9
154.0

155.7
154.1
159.6
158.0
154.7

159.3
158.1
162.3
161.0
158.4

160.7

161.7

162.2

164.9

1.7

159.4
163.8
162.4
159.8

160.2
165.3
163.8
161.3

160.8
165.7
164.4
161.7

163.4
168.0
167.9
163.6

1 .6

1 .2

3.5
3.4
3.5
4.3
3.3

3.3

1 .1

1 .2

7.7
12.5
4.8
3.3

1 .6

2 .8

.9

1.7

3.8
4.6
3.9
3.7

1 .0

3.8

.7
.6

.7

1 .2
1 .8

1.1

Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers.................................................................
Professional specialty and technical....... ...........................
Executive, administrative, and managerial........................
Administrative support, including clerical...........................

1.4
2 .1

Workers, by industry division:
154.4

154.9

155.5

155.9

159.7

160.9

161.8

162.3

164.9

1 .6

154.5

156.1

157.9

158.7

161.0

162.8

164.0

164.2

166.8

1 .6

3.6

158.5
159.1
154.5
154.8
153.1
159.6

160.4
160.7
154.8
155.1
153.4
160.0

161.4
161.8
155.1
155.4
153.6
160.4

163.5
164.1
159.2
159.6
157.7
164.7

165.5
166.2
160.3
160.7
158.8
165.8

166.4
167.0
161.1
161.4
159.4
167.0

166.7
167.3
161.7
162.0
160.0
167.5

169.5
170.3
164.3
164.7
163.0
169.2

1.7

Elementary and secondary.........................................
Colleges and universities...........................................

157.1
157.4
154.1
154.4
152.8
153.8

1 .0

3.7
3.8
3.2
3.2
3.4
2.7

Public administration3 ............................................................

151.9

155.2

156.5

157.9

160.2

161.7

163.4

164.3

167.3

1 .8

4.4

Services...................................................................................
5

Services excluding schools................................................
Health services...................................................................
Educational services.........................................................

1

Cost (cents per hour worked) measured in the Employment Cost Index consists of

wages, salaries, and employer cost of employee benefits.
2

Consists of private industry workers (excluding farm and household workers) and

State and local government (excluding Federal Government) workers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1 .8
1 .6

1.7
1.9

3

Consists of legislative, judicial, administrative, and regulatory activities.

4

This series has the same industry and occupational coverage as the Hourly

Earnings index, which was discontinued in January 1989.
5

Includes, for example, library, social, and health services.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

93

Current Labor Statistics:

26.

Compensation & Industrial Relations

Employment Cost Index, wages and salaries, by occupation and industry group

[June 1989 = 100]
2 301

2002

2003

Percent change

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Sept. 2003
Civilian workers 1 .............................

Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers.........................
Professional specialty and technical....................
Executive, adminitrative, and managerial..........
Administrative support, including clerical.................
Blue-collar workers...............................
Service occupations...........................
Workers, by industry division:
Goods-producing......................................
Manufacturing................................
Service-producing.................................
Services...............................
Health services..............................
Hospitals................................
Educational services...........................
Public administration2.......................
Nonmanufacturing...............................
Private industry workers..................................

Excluding sales occupations................................
Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers..........................
Excluding sales occupations..........................
Professional specialty and technical occupations........
Executive, adminitrative, and managerial occupations..
Sales occupations.............................
Administrative support occupations, including clerical...
Blue-collar workers................................
Precision production, craft, and repair occupations.....
Machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors.........
Transportation and material moving occupations........
Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and laborers....
Service occupations..............................
Production and nonsupervisory occupations3........
Workers, by industry division:
Goods-producing....................................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
White-collar occupations......................................
Excluding sales occupations............................
Blue-collar occupations....................................
Construction....................................
Manufacturing.....................................
White-collar occupations...........................
Excluding sales occupations..............................
Blue-collar occupations...................................
Durables...................................
Nondurables.....................................
Service-producing.................................
Excluding sales occupations.........................
White-collar occupations....................................
Excluding sales occupations............................
Blue-collar occupations.................................
Service occupations...................................
Transportation and public utilities...........................
Transportation....................................
Public utilities..........................................
Communications...................................
Electric, gas, and sanitary services......................
Wholesale and retail trade........................
Excluding sales occupations...............................
Wholesale trade.....................................
Excluding sales occupations.............................. .
Retail trade...................................
General merchandise stores............ ..........
Food stores....................................
See footnotes at end of table.

94

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

152.3

153.4

154.8

156.1

157.2

157.8

159.3

160.3

161.8

154.5
154.2
156.7
154.6
147.6
151.2

155.6
155.1
158.1
155.7
148.5
153.0

157.0
155.6
160.7
157.3
149.7
154.2

158.4
156.2
162.6
158.4
151.0
155.1

159.6
158.0
163.5
159.6
151.9
'56.2

160.1
158.6
163.8
160.6
152.6
156.9

161.9
159.3
167.9
161.8
153.8
158.0

162.9
160.1
169.0
163.1
154.8
158.7

164.5
161.8
170.5
164.3
155.8
159.8

149.5
150.7
153.4
156.2
153.7
15.5
154.6

150.5
151.7
154.5
157.1
155.5
155.5
155.1

151.8
153.1
155.9
158.1
157.3
157.2
155.3

153.1
154.5
157.2
158.8
158.5
158.6
155.6

153.9
155.4
156.4
160.7
159.6
160.3
159.3

155.1
156.5
158.8
161.1
160.9
162.2
160.1

156.3
158.0
160.5
161.9
162.0
163.5
160.4

157.5
159.0
161.4
162.8
163.2
164.4
160.7

158.3
159.7
163.0
164.7
164.7
166.3
162.7

150.3
152.6

151.6
153.8

152.5
155.0

153.4
156.4

154.8
157.5

155.8
158.0

157.2
159.6

158.0
160.5

159.4
162.1

1 .0

152.1
152.2

153.3
153.3

154.7
154.9

156.3
156.1

157.0
157.0

157.5
157.9

159.3
159.4

160.4
160.5

161.7
161.7

.7

154.8
155.7
154.8
157.2
151.2
155.3
147.5
147.7
148.1
142.1
151.0

156.1
156.9
155.9
158.6
152.6
156.5
148.3
148,4
149.0
142.8
152.4

157.7
158.6
156.7
161.3
153.6
158.2
149.6
149.2
150.5
144.8
154.2

159.4
160.0
157.4
163.6
157.0
159.2
150.9
151.0
151.6
145.2
155.1

160.0
169.8
158.2
164.3
156.9
160.3
151.7
151.8
152.0
146.3
156.0

160.4
160.8
158.5
164.5
156.8
161.3
152.4
152.3
153.2
146.9
157.2

162.6
163.6
159.5
169.1
158.1
162.6
153.6
153.4
154.7
147.8
158.4

163.8
164.8
160.5
170.3
159.3
164.0
154.6
154.7
155.3
149.0
159.0

165.3
166.2
162.1
171.8
161.6
165.1
155.6
155.5
156.8
149.8
159.9

148.7

150.6

152.0

152.8

153.9

154.4

155.5

156.1

150.3

151.5

152.7

154.0

154.7

155.2

156.4

157.4

149.5
148.7
152.6
150.8
147.4
145.1
150.7
152.8
150.5
149.1
151.5
149.3

150.5
149.7
153.6
151.7
148.4
146.3
151.7
153.3
151.0
150.3
151.7
153.9

151.7
150.9
155.0
152.9
149.6
147.0
153.1
154.9
152.3
151.7
153.9
151.9

153.1
152.2
156.6
154.5
150.7
148.2
154.4
156.6
153.9
152.8
155.3
153.1

153.9
153.0
157.9
155.4
151.5
149.0
155.4
157.7
155.0
153.5
156.0
154.4

155.0
154.0
158.6
156.3
152.6
150.2
156.5
158.6
155.9
154.7
157.3
155.2

156.3
155.4
160.0
158.0
153.8
150.6
158.0
160.1
157.7
156.3
158.8
156.6

157.4
156.5
161.4
159.2
154.8
152.4
159.0
161.6
158.9
156.9
159.7
157.8

158.3
157.4
161.9
159.9
155.9
153.6
159.7
162.0
159.5
157.9
160.6
158.3

153.2
154.2
155.2
157.2
147.5
148.4
146.7
142.6
152.0
153.3
150.4
150.6
153 1
154.1
157.4
148.8
145.7
145.71

151.9
156.1
157.2
158.2
148.1
149.4
149.2
145.7
153.6
155.2
151.7
152.1

156.1
157.2
158.2
160.4
149.4
151.6
150.5
147.4
154.3
155.3
153.0
153.0

157.7
158.5
159.9
161.6
151.1
152.4
152.1
148.6
156.4
157.1
155.5
155.7

158.4
159.3
160.5
162.5
151.8
153.5
153.4
149.6
158.2
159.6
156.5
155.5

158.6
159.6
160.7
162.8
152.0
154.1
154.1
150.1
159.3
160.7
157.4
155.5

160.6
161.7
163.0
165.3
153.2
155.1
154.8
150.5
160.4
161.9
158.6
156.7

161.7
162.8
164.1
166.5
154.3
155.6
155.6
150.6
162.1
163.4
160.4
157.5

163.3
164.2
166.0
168.2
155.1
156.6
156.0
150.4
163.4
165.4
161.0
159.2

154.8
157.9
150.7
146.5
146.7

157.2
159.4
150.9
147.9
148.0

161.3
161.2
152.7
148.9
148.9 1

160.4
162.6
152.9
150.1
150.1

161.0
163.7
152.7
149.2
150.3

163.4
163.9
153.1
149.8
151.0

164.7
165.2
153.8
152.0
151.6

164.8
165.7
156.3
153.1
152.2

January 2004

0.9

2.9

1 .0

3 1

1 .1

? 4

g

43

.7

9 Q

.fi

.6

2

.7

2.3

.5

29

.6

2R

1 .2

2.9
2.5
3.2
3.7

1 .2

2 .1

1 .0
1 .2

.9

.9

.8

.9
.8
1 .0

.9
1.4
.7

30
2.9
3.0
3.0

33
34
25
46
30
30

.6

2 .6

.5

.6

2.4
32
24
2.5

157.1

.6

2 .1

158.8

.9

2.7

.6

2.9
29

1 .0

.5

.6

.3
.4
.7
.8

2 .8

29
2.9
3.1

.4

2 8

.2

27
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.5

.4
.6
.6

.3
1 .0

.9
1 .2
1 .0

3 1
3 1
34
3.5

.5

2 2

.6

2 0

.3

1.7
.5
33
3.6
29

-.1
.8
1 .2

.4
1.1

24

.1

2.7
1.9

.3
1 .6

2 .2

.7
.4

2 .0

1.4

26. Continued— Employment Cost Index, wages and salaries, by occupation and industry group
[June 1989 = 100]
P ercent change

2003

2002

2001

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Sept. 2003
Finance, insurance, and real estate..... ............................
Excluding sales occupations.........................................
Banking, savings and loan, and other credit agencies.
Insurance................................................ ............................
Services..................................................................................
Business services..............................................................
Health services...................................................................
Hospitals...........................................................................
Educational services......................................................... .
Colleges and universities...............................................
Nonmanufacturing................................................................
White-collar workers..........................................................
Excluding sales occupations.......................................
Blue-collar occupations.....................................................
Service occupations..........................................................

State and local government workers..................................

155.8
159.1
173.2
153.6
157.1
162.8
153.6
153.3
159.6
158.4
152.2
155.0
156.9
145.8
148.2

1 .6

7.2
7.9
14.4
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.2
3.9
3.1

1.5

2 .8

1 .0

.7

3.1
3.4
3.5
2.4

.6

2 .0

156.0
159.1
171.7
155.0
158.2
163.7
155.4
155.4
160.5
159.6

160.3
164.5
181.2
157.1
159.5
164.0
157.3
157.1
161.2
159.9

162.0
165.7
182.8
158.6
160.3
164.0
158.4
158.6
161.2
159.9

162.4
166.1
182.7
159.6
161.5
164.6
159.9
160.2
165.2
163.1

162.6
167.3
183.9
159.1
161.7
164.8
160.7
162.1
166.5
164.3

171.1
176.7
206.4
161.6
162.8
165.6
161.9
163.6
167.1
164.4

172.4
178.5
208.7
163.0
164.0
166.4
163.2
164.6
167.5
165.1

174.1
179.2
209.1
163.9
165.9
169.1
164.6
166.5
170.3
167.6

1 .0

153.5
156.4
158.3
146.4
150.1

155.0
158.0
160.1
147.5
151.4

156.5
159.6
161.3
149.0
152.3

157.2
160.2
162.1
149.8
153.4

157.5
160.5
162.5
150.2
154.0

159.4
162.8
164.9
151.1
155.0

160.5
163.9
166.1
152.4
155.5

162.1
165.7
167.7
153.4
156.5

160.1

161.5

162.6

163.2

165.9

1 .0

2.3

157.4
157.5
159.0
155.1
154.5

158.4
158.4
160.1
156.0
155.1

158.9
158.8
160.9
156.9
156.2

159.2
159.1
161.0
157.2
156.5

161.0
161.0
162.5
159.1
157.6

1 .1

2.3

1 .2

2 .2

.9

2 .2

1 .2

2 .6

1 .1

154.3

155.2

156.1

156.7

152.7
153.0
153.9
149.8
149.1

153.3
153.4
155.1
150.9
150.8

153.9
153.6
156.6
151.9
151.6

154.4
154.1
156.8
152.8
152.1

.4
.2
.6
1 .2
1 .6

.9
1 .2

1 .1
1 .0

Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers.................................................................
Professional specialty and technical...................................
Executive, administrative, and manager al.........................

.7

2 .0

Workers, by industry division:
153.7

154.2

154.6

155.0

158.4

159.2

159.5

159.8

161.6

153.2
154.2
154.2
153.6
153.8
152.8
156.5

154.9
155.8
155.7
154.0
154.1
153.1
156.7

156.7
157.8
157.7
154.2
154.3
153.4
156.8

157.3
158.6
158.8
154.5
154.6
153.6
157.3

159.1
160.5
160.6
158.1
158.3
157.4
160.7

160.3
162.2
162.5
158.9
159.0
158.1
161.6

161.4
162.9
163.1
159.1
159.2
158.2
162.1

161.8
163.5
163.8
159.3
159.5
158.5
162.1

163.2
165.1
165.5
161.2
161.4
160.6
163.5

150.3

151.6

152.5

153.4

154.8

155.8

157.2

158.0

159.4

4

Services excluding schools................................................
Health services...................................................................

Elementary and secondary.........................................
Public administration2 ............................................................
1

Consists of private industry workers (excluding farm and household workers) and

State and local government (excluding Federal Government) workers.

2

Consists of legislative, judicial, adminlst-ative, and regulatory activities.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2 .0

.9

2 .6

1 .0
1 .0

2.9
3.1

1 .2

2 .0

1 .2

2 .0

1.3
.9

2 .0

.9

3.0

1.7

This series has the same industry and occupational coverage as the Hourly
Earnings index, which was discontinued in January 1989.
4

Includes, for example, library, social, and health services.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

95

Current Labor Statistics: Compensation & Industrial Relations

27.

Employment Cost Index, benefits, private industry workers by occupation and industry group

[June 1989 = 100]__________
20 01

2002

2003

P ercent change

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Sept. 2003
Private industry workers......................................

165.2

166.7

169.3

171.6

173.1

174.6

179.6

182.0

184.3

1.3

6.5

169.5
158.3

171.2
159.2

173.5
162.2

176.1
164.0

177.2
166.2

178.5
167.8

183.6
172.7

185.5
176.1

187.7
178.4

1 .2

59

1.3

7.3

160.8
167.1

162.6
168.4
160.4
168.6

165.8
170.7
163.7
171.1

167.4
173.3
165.5
173.5

168.8
174.9
166.8
175.2

171.0
175.9
168.9
176.3

178.0
179.9
176.9
180.3

180.2
182.3
179.0
182.8

182.3
184.7
181.1
185.1

Workers, by occupational group:
White-collar workers.........................................
Blue-collar workers....................................
Workers, by industry division:
Goods-producing.........................................
Service-producing.......................................
Manufacturing............................................
Nonmanufacturing........................................

96

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

158.5
167.4

January 2004

1 .2

8 0

1.3

5

1 .2

8 6

1.3

5.7

6

28.

Employment Cost Index, private nonfarm workers by bargaining status, region, and area size

[June 1989 = 100]

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Percent change

2003

2002

2001

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

3 m onths

12 m onths

ended

ended

Sept. 2003
COMPENSATION
Workers, by bargaining status 1
4.8
5.4
4.1
5.8
4.2

Union........................................................................
Goods-producing.....................................................
Service-producing....................................................
Manufacturing..........................................................
Nonmanufacturing....................................................

151.0
150.6
151.2
149.9
151.1

153.1
151.6
154.2
151.4
153.5

154.8
153.4
156.0
153.4
155.0

156.3
154.7
157.6
154.6
156.6

158.1
156.2
159.9
155.9
158.8

159.5
157.8
161.1
157.9
159.9

162.1
161.4
162.6
162.3
161.4

164.1
163.4
164.6
163.8
163.7

165.7
164.7
166.5
165.0
165.5

1 .0

Nonunion...................................................................
Goods-producing......................................................
Service-producing....................................................
Manufacturing.........................................................
Nonmanufacturing....................................................

156.7
154.0
157.5
154.4
157.0

157.8
155.3
158.6
155.5
158.2

159.6
157.2
160.3
157.6
159.9

161.4
158.6
162.2
159.1
161.7

162.5
159.5
162.9
160.1
162.4

162.8
160.8
163.3
161.3
162.9

165.4
163.6
165.9
164.5
165.4

166.8
164.9
167.2
165.8
166.7

168.4
166.1
169.0
166.9
168.5

1 .0

155.2
153.5
157.4
157.6

156.3
154.6
158.6
159.4

158.3
156.2
161.1
160.4

159.9
157.6
162.2
162.9

160.5
158.9
163.5
163.8

161.3
159.0
164.6
165.0

163.8
160.6
169.0
167.3

165.2
161.6
170.4
169.5

166.9
163.2
171.7
171.4

1 .0

156.0
154.8

157.4
155.6

159.1
157.5

160.9
158.5

161.8
160.0

162.5
169.8

165.2
163.5

166.6
165.0

168.3
166.1

1 .0

.7

4.0
3.8

Union........................................................................
Goods-producing.....................................................
Service-producing....................................................
Manufacturing.........................................................

145.1
145.3
145.4
146.7
144.3

147.4
146.3
148.9
148.0
147.1

148.4
147.2
150.0
149.0
148.1

149.8
158.6
151.4
150.2
149.6

151.3
150.0
152.9
151.6
151.1

152.5
151.2
154.1
153.1
152.1

153.3
152.4
154.6
154.6
152.5

154.3
153.9
155.1
155.9
153.5

155.3
154.8
156.3
156.7
154.6

.6

2 .6

Nonunion..................................................................

153.4
151.1
154.1
152.2
153.3

154.4
152.1
155.1
153.1
154.4

155.9
153.5
156.7
154.7
155.9

157.5
154.8
158.3
156.1
157.5

158.1
155.5
158.9
156.8
158.1

158.5
156.6
159.0
157.8
158.3

160.4
157.8
161.2
159.3
160.4

161.5
158.9
162.3
160.2
161.5

163.0
159.7
164.0
160.9
163.1

150.6
150.2
153.6
154.3

151.7
151.2
154.7
156.0

153.5
152.5
157.1
156.4

154.9
153.6
158.5
158.7

155.1
154.7
159.2
159.;

155.7
154.6
160.2
160.1

157.3
155.3
164.1
161.3

158.4
156.1
165.0
163.1

160.0
157.4
166.1
164.7

152.4

153.7

155.1

156.7

157.4

157.9

159.6

160.7

162.2

.8
1 .2

.7
1 .1

.7
1 .1

.7
1 .1

3.8
4.1
3.7
4.2
3.8

Workers, by region 1

Northeast............................................. ....................
South.......................................................................
Midwest (formerly North Central)....................................
West........................................................................

1 .0
.8
1 .1

4.0
2.7
5.0
4.6

Workers, by area size 1

Metropolitan areas......................................................
WAGES AND SALARIES
Workers, by bargaining status 1

Nonmanufacturing...................................................

.6

3.2

.8

2 .2

.5
.7

2.3

.9
.5
1 .0

3.4

3.1
2.7
3.2

.4

2 .6

1 .0

3.2

1 .0

3.2
1.7
4.3
3.4

Workers, by region 1

Midwest (formerly North Central)...................................

.8

.7
1 .0

Workers, by area size 1
.9

.6
158.9
158.0
156.8
154.8
153.8
152.6
151.7
149.7
150.5 I
Other areas..............................................................
1 The indexes are calculated differently fromthose for the occupation and industry groups. For a detailed description of the index calculation, see the M o n th ly L a b o r R e v ie w
Technical Note, "Estimation procedures for the Employment Cost Index," May 1982.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

3.0
3.3

97

Current Labor Statistics:

Compensation & Industrial Relations

29. Percent of full-time employees participating in employer-provided benefit plans, and in selected features within plans
medium and large private establishments, selected years, 1980-97

Item
1980
1982
1984
Scope of survey (in000's).................
21,042
21,013
Number of employees (in000's):
With medical care............
20,711
20,412
20,383
With life insurance..................
20,498
20,201
20,172
With defined benefit plan......................
17,936
17,676
17,231
Time-off plans
Participants with:
Paid lunchtime.......................
10
Average minutes per day...........
Paid rest time..........................
75
76
73
Average minutes per day............
25
Paid funeral leave......................
Average days per occurrence..................
Paid holidays.....................
Average days per year........................
10.1
10.0
9.8
Paid personal leave.........................
20
Average days per year.......................
Paid vacations...........................
Paid sick leave 1......................
62
67
67
Unpaid maternity leave................
_
_
Unpaid paternity leave...............
Unpaidfamily leave..................
Insurance plans
Participants inmedical care plans.................
97
97
97
Percent of participants with coverage for:
Home health care.......................
Extendedcare facilities....................
58
62
Physical exam...............................
8
Percent of participants with employee
contribution requiredfor:
Self coverage.......................
26
27
36
_
_
Average monthlycontribution.................
$11.93
Family coverage...........................
46
51
58
Average montmycontribution..................
$35.93
Participants inlife insurance plans..........
96
96
96
Percent of participants with:
Accidental death and dismemberment
insurance.............................
69
72
74
Survivor income benefits.....................
_
Retiree protection available......................
64
64
Participants inlong-termdisability
insurance plans................................
40
43
47
Participants insickness and accident
insurance plans................................
61
Participants inshort-termdisability plans 1.........
Retirement plans
Participants indefined benefit pension plans........
84
84
82
Percent of participants with:
Normal retirement priorto age 65...........
55
58
63
Early retirement available...................
98
97
97
Ad hoc pension increase inlast 5 years............
47
Terminal earnings formula......................
53
52
54
Benefit coordinatedwith Social Security............
45
45
56
_
_
Participants indefined contribution plans..............
Participants inplans withtax-deferred savings
arrangements..........................
Other benefits
Employees eligible for:
Flexible benefits plans.....................
Reimbursement accounts2................
Premiumconversion plans................
The definitions for paid sick leave and short-term disability (previously sickness and
accident insurance) were changed for the 1995 survey. Paid sick leave now includes only
plans that specify either a maximum number of days per year or unlimited days. Shortterms disability now includes all insured, self-insured, and State-mandated plans available
on a per-disability basis, as well as the unfunded per-disability plans previously reported as
sick leave. Sickness and accident insurance, reported in years priorto this survey, included
only insured, self-insured, and State-mandated plans providing per-disability bene-

98

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

1986

1988

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

21,303

31,059

32,428

31,163

28,728

33,374

38,409

20,238
20,451
16,190

27,953
28,574
19,567

29,834
30,482
20,430

25,865
29,293
18,386

23,519
26,175
16,015

25,548
29,078
17,417

29,340
33,495
19,202

10
27
72
26
88
3.2
99
10.0
25
3.7
100
70
-

11
29
72
26
85
3.2
96
9.4
24
3.3
98
69
33
16
-

10
26
71
26
84
3.3
97
9.2
22
3.1
97
68
37
18
-

8
30
67
28
80
3.3
92
10.2
21
3.3
96
67
37
26
-

9
29
68
26
83
3.0
91
9.4
21
3.1
97
65
60
53
-

80
3.3
89
9.1
22
3.3
96
58

81
3.7
89
9.3
20
3.5
95
56

84

93

95

90

92

83

82

77

76

66
70
18

76
79
28

75
80
28

81
80
30

86
82
42

78
73
56

85
78
63

43
$12.80
63
$41.40
96

44
$19.29
64
$60.07
92

47
$25.31
66
$72.10
94

51
$26.60
69
$96.97
94

61
$31.55
76
$107.42
91

67
$33.92
78
$118.33
87

69
$39.14
80
$130.07
87

72
10
59

78
8
49

71
7
42

71
6
44

76
5
41

77
7
37

74
6
33

48

42

45

40

41

42

43

49

46

43

45

44

-

-

-

-

-

53

55

76

63

63

59

56

52

50

64
98
35
57
62
60

59
98
26
55
62
45

62
97
22
64
63
48

55
98
7
56
54
48

52
95
6
61
48
49

52
96
4
58
51
55

52
95
10
56
49
57

33

36

41

44

43

54

55

2
5

5
12

9
23

10
36

12
52

12
38
5

13
32
7

_

fits at less than full pay.
2 Prior to 1995, reimbursement accounts included premium conversion plans, which
specifically allow medical plan participants to pay required plan premiums with pretax
dollars. Also, reimbursement accounts that were part of flexible benefit plans were
tabulated separately.
N o t e : Dash indicates d ata not available.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

30. Percent of full-time employees participating in employer-provided benefit plans, and in selected features
within plans, small private establishments and State and local governments, 1987,1990,1992,1994, and 1996
State and local governments

Small private establishments
Item

Number of employees (in000's):

1994

1992

1990

1987

1996

1994

1992

1990

12,972

12,466

12,907
11,192
11,194
11,708

32,466

34,360

35,910

39,816

10,321

22,402
20,778
6,493

24,396
21,990
7,559

23,536
21,955
5,480

25,599
24,635
5,883

9,599
8,773
9,599

12,064
11,415
11,675

11,219
11,095
10,845

8
37
48
27
47
2.9
84
9.5
11
2.8
88
47
17
8

9
37
49
26
50
3.0
82
9.2
12
2.6
88
53
18
7

17
34
58
29
56
3.7
81
10.9
38
2.7
72
97
57
30

11
36
56
29
63
3.7
74
13.6
39
2.9
67
95
51
33

10
34
53
29
65
3.7
75
14.2
38
2.9
67
95
59
44
-

Time-off plans

Participants with:

_

-

_

-

_

-

50
3.1
82
7.5
13
2.6
88
50

51
3.0
80
7.6
14
3.0
86
50

_

_

47

69

71

79
83
26

80
84
28

Percent of participants withemployee
contribution requiredfor:

42
$25.13
67
$109.34
64

47
$36.51
73
$150.54
64

52
$40.97
76
$159.63
61

Percent of participants with:
Accidental death and dismemberment

78
1
19

76
1
25

Participants inlong-termdisability
Participants insickness and accident

19
6

48

-

66

64

93

93

90

87

-

-

-

-

76
78
36

82
79
36

87
84
47

84
81
55

52
$42.63
75
$181.53
62

35
$15.74
71
$71.89
85

38
$25.53
65
$117.59
88

43
$28.97
72
$139.23
89

47
$30.20
71
$149.70
87

79
2
20

77
1
13

67
1
55

67
1
45

74
1
46

64
2
46

23

20

22

31

27

28

30

26

26

14

21

22

21

15

93

90

87

91

47
92

92
90
33
10C
18
S

89
88
16
100
8
9

92
89
10
100
10
9

92
87
13
99
49
9

28

45

45

24

£
31

5
50

5
64

29
Retirement plans

Percent of participants with:

Participants inolans withtax-deferred savings

-

93

-

Insurance plans

Percent of participants withcoverage for:

_

_

_

62
3.7
73
11.5
38
3.0
66
94

20

22

15

54
95
7
5E
4Ç
31

50
95
4
54
46
33

34

53
44
38

17

24

2C

28

14

:
1S

12

_

_

Other benefits

Employees eligible for:
Premiumconversion plans ...........................
1 Methods used to calculate the average number of paid holidays were revised
in 1994 to count partial days more precisely. Average holidays for 1994 are
not comparable withthose reported in 1990 and 1992.
2 The definitions for paid sick leave and short-term disability (previously
sickness and accident insurance) were changed forthe 1996 survey. Paid sick
leave now includes only plans that specify either a maximumnumber of days
per year or unlimited days. Short-termdisability now includes all insured, selfinsured, and State-mandated plans available on a per-disability basis, as well
as the unfunded per-disability plans previously reportedas sick leave.

Sickness and accident insurance, reported in years prior to this survey,
included only Insured, self-insured, and State-mandated plans providing perdisabilitybenefits at less than full pay.
3 Prior to 1996, reimbursement accounts included premiumconversion plans,
which specifically allow medical plan participants to pay required plan
premiums with pretax dollars. Also, reimbursement accounts that were part of
flexible benefit plans were tabulated separately.
NOTE: Dash indicates data not available.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

99

Current Labor Statistics:

Compensation & Industrial Relations

31. Work stoppages involving 1,000 workers or more
Annua I totals
2001

Number of stoppages:
Beginning inperiod.....................
Ineffect during period..................
Workers involved:
Beginning inperiod (inthousands)....
Ineffect during period (inthousands)
Days idle:
Number (inthousands).................
Percent of estimated working time1...

2002

20

Nov.

CM
O

Measure

2003p

Dec.

Jan.

100

Monthly Labor Review

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

29
30

19
20

2
2

1
1

1
2

0
0

2
2

1
1

1
1

1
1

0
1

2
2

0
2

5
5

o
3

99
102

46
47

4.3
4.3

1.4
1.4

17.5
18.8

.0
.0

4.0
4.0

4.0
4.0

1.3
4.0

4.0
4.0

.0
4.0

3.2
3.2

.0
3.2

92.9
92.9

8.0
76.7

1,151
.00

6,596
.00

23.9
.00

28.6
.00

48.8
.00

0.0
Ô

18.5
.00

40.0
.00

40.0
.00

16.0
(2)

12.0
(2)

10.9
(2)

working time; private household, forestry, and fishery employees are excluded. An
explanation of the measurement of idleness as a percentage of the total time worked
is found in"Total economy measures of strike idleness,"


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Feb.

January 2004

M onthly L abor R e v ie w ,

October 1968, pp.54-56.

2 Less than 0.005.
Note: Dash indicates data not available. P= preliminary.

51.3 1,318.3 1,219.0
0
.04
.05

32. Consumer Price Indexes for All Urban Consumers and for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers: U.S. city average,
by expenditure category arid commodity or service group
[1 9 8 2 -8 4 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]

CONSUMERPRICEINDEX
FORALLURBANCONSUMERS
All items....................................................
All items (1967 = 100)..................................
Food and beverages...................................
Food.............................................. .......
Food at home.........................................
Cereals andbakery products..................... .
Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs.....................
Dairyand relatedproducts1.......................
Fruits and vegetables..............................
Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage
materials...........................................
Other foods at home...............................
Sugar and sweets.................................
Fats and oils.......................................
Other foods........................................
Other miscellaneous foods1,2.................
Food away fromhome1..............................
Other food away fromhome1,2..................
Alcoholic beverages.................................
Housing..................................................
Shelter......................................... .......
Rent of primary residence........................
Lodging away fromhome.........................
Owners' equivalent rent of primary residence3.
Tenants' and household insurance1,2..........
Fuels and utilities.................................
Fuels...............................................
Fuel oil and otherfuels........................
Gas (piped) andelectricity....................
Householdfurnishings and operations.........
Apparel.................................................
Men's andboys' apparel..........................
Women's and girls' apparel......................
Infants' andtoddlers' apparel1..................
Footwear............................................
Transportation........................................
Private transportation..............................
Newand used motor vehicles2.................
Newvehicles.....................................
Used cars andtrucks1..........................
Motorfuel...........................................
Gasoline (all types)..............................
Motorvehicle parts and equipment............
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair.......
Publictransportation...............................
Medical care..........................................
Medical care commodities........................
Medical care services.............................
Professional services............................
Hospital and related services...................
Recreation2...........................................
Video and audio1,2................................
Education and communication2...................
Education2.........................................
Educational books and supplies...... ......
Tuition, other school fees, and childctire....
Communication1,2................................
Information and information processing1,2 ...
Telephone services1'2 .......................
Information and information processing
otherthan telephone services1'4.........
Personal computers and peripheral
12
equipment'
............................
Other goods and services.........................
Tobacco and smoking products................
Personal care1....................................
Personal care products1.......................
Personal care services1.......................
See footnotes at end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Nov.

Oct.

Sept.

Aug.

July

May

Apr.

Mar.

Feb.

Jan.

Dec.

Nov.

2002

2001

2003

2002

Annual average
Series

177.1
530.4
173.6
173.1
173.4
193.8
161.3
167.1
212.2

179.9
538.8
176.8
176.2
175.6
198.0
162.1
168.1
220.9

181.3
543.1
177.4
176.8
175.5
198.3
162.1
167.1
219.8

180.9
541.9
177.8
177.3
176.1
197.3
162.4
167.3
224.9

181.7
544.2
178.1
177.5
176.7
199.8
161.6
166.4
227.1

183.1
548.5
178.9
178.3
177.6
201.8
164.7
167.2
223.3

184.2
551.8
179.2
178.6
177.7
202.1
164.8
167.1
223.6

183.8
550.5
179.0
178.4
177.3
201.9
165.2
165.8
221.3

183.5
549.7
179.4
178.8
177.8
203.0
164.7
165.4
226.2

183.9
550.9
180.3
179.7
178.9
204.5
168.2
164.7
226.6

184.6
553.0
180.9
180.4
179.7
204.5
169.7
167.5
224.9

185.2
554.7
181.3
180.7
180.1
203.5
171.1
170.3
224.4

185.0
554.3
182.2
181.7
181.5
203.1
174.0
171.8
226.3

184.5
552.7
182.9
182.4
182.4
202.5
179.3
171.2
227.5

139.2
159.6
155.7
155.7
176.0
108.9
173.9
113.4
179.3
176.4
200.6
192.1
118.6
206.3
106.2
150.2
135.4
129.3
142.4
129.1
127.3
125.7
119.3
129.2
123.0
154.3
150.0
101.3
142.1
158.7
124.7
124.0
104.8
183.5
210.6
272.6
247.6
278.6
246.!
338.5
104.'
101.
105.
118.
295.
341.
93.3
92.3
99.3

139.2
160.8
159.0
155.4
177.1
109.2
178.3
117.7
183.6
180.3
208.1
199.7
118.3
214.7
108.7
143.6
127.2
115.5
134.4
128.3
124.0
121.7
115.8
126.4
121.4
152.9
148.8
99.2
140.0
152.0
116.6
116.0
106.9
190.2
207.4
285.6
256.4
292.8
253.6
367.6
1-6.2
102.6
107.8
126.C
317.
362.
92.
90.
99. 7

139.1
161.1
158.5
153.4
178.3
110.3
179.8
119.7
185.1
181.2
209.6
202.0
113.2
217.3
111.4
143.6
127.0
121.8
133.7
127.8
125.5
123.2
118.0
127.5
122.7
155.2
151.5
98.8
140.4
148.8
124.4
123.8
107.2
192.8
202.3
290.5
259.1
298.5
256.5
380.7
106.4
103.C
109.2
130.C
324.C
374.
91.i
90.(
99.

139.8
161.1
159.1
152.8
178.2
110.2
180.1
119.8
184.9
181.1
209.5
202.5
109.2
217.9
112.3
144.2
127.5
125.6
134.1
127.0
121.5
119.3
113.1
125.3
120.7
154.2
150.4
98.7
140.6
148.5
119.7
119.1
107.0
193.3
203.0
291.3
259.5
299.4
257.C
382.4
106.5
103.5
109.;
130.(
323.
374.
91.
90.
99. 9

140.6
161.8
169.7
155.8
178.2
109.7
179.9
119.9
185.8
182.3
210.9
203.3
114.3
218.5
113.9
146.1
129.5
136.6
135.6
127.4
118.1
116.1
107.6
121.1
119.7
155.5
151.8
98.2
139.7
148.3
126.3
125.7
107.8
193.7
202.2
292.6
260.3
300.8
257.8
385.7
106.9
103.4
109.7
130.5
329.5
375.5
92.C
90.;
100.'

140.8
162.2
161.8
158.7
177.9
110.5
180.7
120.2
185.9
183.2
211.6
203.7
117.6
218.7
114.1
148.3
131.9
156.3
136.9
127.7
120.6
117.3
112.4
122.3
119.8
158.9
155.3
98.0
139.2
148.4
140.4
139.7
108.2
194.5
203.6
293.7
260.4
302.3
258.8
388.2
107.2
103.8
109.7
131.0
332.5
376.:
91.<
90.
100.

140.3
162.6
162.5
157.5
178.6
110.1
181.0
120.4
186.6
184.3
212.1
204.1
119.7
218.9
114.0
154.5
138.5
169.0
143.5
127.1
123.6
121.0
117.2
124.1
119.8
161.0
157.3
98.0
139.3
148.5
148.1
147.4
107.9
194.3
206.1
294.2
261.4
302.8
259.1
388.7
107.4
103.'
109.'
131.
333.
376.
91.
89.5
99.7

140.5
162.1
161.4
156.1
178.5
110.4
181.1
120.4
186.4
184.1
212.1
204.5
118.7
218.9
114.2
153.1
136.8
147.9
143.0
127.2
123.9
120.8
117.8
123.4
119.9
159.3
155.5
97.8
138.7
148.4
140.6
139.9
107.7
194.6
207.2
294.8
261.8
303.1
259.8
388.7
107.4
103.8
109.C
131.:
332.
377.
90.
88. 5
98.7

140.3
162.1
162.3
157.6
177.8
110.1
181.5
120.5
186.7
184.5
212.8
204.9
121.4
219.1
114.3
153.7
137.5
137.0
144.5
126.3
122.5
119.5
115.5
123.6
119.7
157.2
153.1
97.4
138.1
147.9
131.3
130.6
107.8
194.9
211.6
295.8
261.8
304.;
261.1
388.8
107.8
103.8
108.
131.
332.
377.
89.3
87. 9
98.

138.4
167.7
162.7
156.3
179.0
111.3
182.2
121.3
187.2
185.9
213.8
205.6
124.8
219.6
115.6
159.4
143.6
130.5
151.6
126.1
116.2
113.8
106.1
117.9
117.5
156.8
152.4
96.5
137.7
145.7
130.6
130.0
107.6
196.0
216.7
297.6
263.6
306.4
260.9
394.7
107.7
103.7
108.9
132.8
335.C
381.;
89.'
87.!
98.

139.7
163.2
162.5
157.7
179.4
109.9
182.6
121.4
187.1
186.1
214.3
206.1
125.1
220.1
115.8
159.2
143.0
130.7
151.0
125.5
117.2
113.4
107.9
120.8
117.8
158.3
154.1
96.0
136.8
143.3
139.0
138.4
107.9
195.7
213.8
298.4
264.1
307.2
261.7
398.8
107.'
103."
110.
136.:
338.
392.
89.

139.2
163.1
162.3
157.6
179.4
111.0
182.8
121.8
187.9
185.8
213.8
206.6
118.5
220.7
115.9
159.6
143.4
130.5
151.5
125.2
122.0
117.3
115.5
124.1
120.3
159.4
155.4
95.1
136.4
139.0
147.1
146.5
107.7
196.2
211.2
299.2
264.9
308.2
262.5
399.8
107.’
103.!
110.5
138.'
338.;
400.
88.

140.5
163.0
162.5
159.7
178.7
110.7
183.3
122.3
188.1
185.7
214.7
206.9
120.9
221.4
116.0
155.0
138.2
131.4
145.6
125.1
124.8
120.8
118.8
125.2
121.8
157.1
153.0
94.6
136.5
135.1
136.6
136.0
107.9
196.9
211.3
299.2
264.7
309.1
263.C
400.'
107.8
103.!
110.5
139.
339.
401.
88.

137.9
162.0
161.7
157.3
177.9
109.0
183.8
122.7
188.6
185.1
214.2
207.5
115.0
221.9
114.3
152.9
135.7
134.8
142.6
124.9
123.1
121.4
115.7
123.0
121.0
155.7
151.7
94.6

21 3

18. 3

17.

17.2

17.

16.3

16.8

16.7

16.4

295
282 6
4252
170 5
155 1
184.3|

22.2
293 2
461 b
1747
1547
188 4

20.D
295.6
470.4
175.5
154.2
1899

19.7
2958
4725
1754
1534
1899

19. 5
296.5
472. 4
175.9
153.0
190 6

19.
297.5
472.7
1767
153 3
190 9

187
19.0
297 3 298 1
467 2 467 9
1772 177 7
153.3 154 1
191.7| 192 5

18 0
298 1
4656
1779
1536
1930

132.0
131.2
130.6
107.9
197.2
207.9
300.8
264.0
310.6
263.0
405.6
107.8
103.8
110.8
139.0
336.0
401.2
88.2

97.3

97.

97.

97.2

16.

15.7

15.6

15.6

15.4

17.2
299. 2
469.
178.4
154.2
1932

16.7
299 6
471 8
178 4
153b
1939

16.3
299.
468 7
1790
1534
195 4

16.5

16.3

469 5
179 1
153
195 6

469.1
179.0

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

194.2

101

Current Labor Statistics:

32.

Price Data

Continued-Consumer Price Indexes for All Urban Consumers and for Urban Wage Earnersand Clerical Workers: U.S. city
average, by expenditure category and commodity or service group

[1 9 8 2 -8 4 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]

Series

Annua average
2001

Miscellaneous personal services....
service group:
Commodities..........
Food and beverages.......
Commodities less food and beverages
Nondurables less food and beverages...
Apparel.................
Nondurables less food, beverages,
and apparel....................
Durables.................
Services..............
Rent of shelter3.......
Transporatation services..
Other services.........
Special indexes:
All items less food......
All items less shelter.......
All items less medical care.....
Commodities less food...
Nondurables less food.......
Nondurables less food and apparel.
Nondurables..............
Services less rent of shelter3.......
Services less medical care services
Energy.................
All items less energy...
All items less food and energy.
Commodities less food and energy
Energy commodities..........
Services less energy.........

263.1

2002

274.4

2002
Nov.

2003

Dec.

Jan.

276. B 276.

278.

280.4

281.4

282.

282.7

283.8

150.
178.
133.
146.
118.

152. 0
178.
136. 4
151.
120.

153.
1/9.
138.
154.
123.

152.,
179.(
136.
152.5
123.5

150.9
179.4
134. 5
148.9
122.

167.'
119.Î
213.1

174.
119.
214.C

212.C
251.4

213.4
252.4

177.Î
119.Î
215.
220.5
214.5
252.(

173.5
119.2
215.1
220.8
215.C
252.5

182.4
172.3
175.9
135.6 135.8
148.4
165.0 168.2
161.6 162.2
220.5 221.6
204.3 205.5
123.3 127.5
189.0
191.8
142.5 141.7
127.5
219.8 221.0

183.9
174.C
177.3
138.3
153.3
174.4
165.3

185.5
1/6.V.
178.4
139.8
156.5
1//./
167.2
224.4
207.4
142.6
190.2
193.0
142.6
150.1
222.4

C om m odity a n d

6
137 2
147

176.
134.
145.

135.
148.

177.
133.(
121.Î

208.

216.'
209.1

218.2

182
i ■
138.5
149.1
164.1
160.6
212.3
196.6
183.5
186.1
145.3
125.2
209.6

174.3
136.C
147.4
163.3

166.9

217.5
202.5

220.2
204.3

187.7
190.5
143.7

143.6

217.5

163.S
120.2
211.2
218.1
212.C
250.2

Feb.

206.4
135.4
189.7
192.5
142.1
142.1
221.9

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

284.

Aug,

Sept

Oct.

284.3

285.3

285.8

287.0

150.4 150. 0
180.2 180.3
133.B 132. 3
147.4 146.3
119.
116.

150. 9
180. 9
133.9
149.
117.

152.0
181. 3
135.4
153.
122. 3

151.4
182.2
134.
151.2
124.3

150.9
182.9
132.9
149.0
123.1

169.
118.
215.5
221.
216.8
252.8

168.
118.
216.8
221.'
217.
253.C

173.
116.
218.8
223.
217.;
255.8

176.1 171.
115.
115.
218.
218.
222.
223.
216.
218.<
257.8 257.Î

184.7
174.7
178.0
138.6
154.3
174.2
165.9
224.6
207.5
138.1
190.2
193.1
142.5
141.7
222.5

184.5
174.1
177.7
136.5
151.1
169.9
164.3
225.5
208.2
134.0
190.3
193.2
141.7
132.3
223.1

184.5 184.8 185.C 186.8
174.C 174.2 175.C 176.C
177.9 178.C 178.7 179.;
135.5 134.2 135.0 137.;
151.1 149.C 151.5 155.2
169.4 170.0 173.4 176.Ê
163.9 163.5 165.2 167.4
227.2 228.0 228.4 229.2
209.1 209.8 210.3 210.3
136.5 136.8 140.6 144.6
190.3 190.5 190.8 191.0
193.0 193.2 193.5 193.6
140.8 139.9 139.7 140.2
130.9 131.3 139.2 146.9
223.5 224.3 224.9 224.9

185.8
175.8
179.1
136.1
153.;
172.2
166.6
228.7
210.5
136.9
191.7
194.3
140.4
137.0
225.8

184.9
174.9
178.5
135.0
151.3
170.0
166.1
228.2
209.9
133.1
191.6
193.9
139.9
132.1
225.6

180.3
53/.1
i ra.b
177.9
176.8
202.1
164.8
166.7
222.2

179.8
535.5
178.3
177.7
176.4
201.8
165.2
165.6
220.0

179.4
534.3
178.7
178.1
176.8
202.9
164.6
165.1
224.3

179.6
534.3
179.5
178.9
177.9
203.7
167.0
163.5
225.7

179.6
535.0
179.6
179.1
178.0
204.4
168.2
164.4
225.3

180.6
537.1
180.2
179.7
178.8
204.5
169.5
167.0
223.8

181.0
539.2
180.7
180.2
179.4
203.5
170.9
170.2
223.4

180.7
538.2
181.7
181.2
180.7
203.2
173.8
171.7
224.9

180.2
536.7
182.4
181.9
181.6
202.4
179.2
171.0
225.3

139.5
162.1
162.1
157.7
178.9
110.5
181.0
120.7
186.8
179.9
205.9
203.4
120.4
198.8
113.8
153.6
137.0
167.9
142.6
122.8
122.5
120.6
116.4
125.8
119.6
160.3
157.8
98.0

139.6
161.7
160.9
156.2
179.0
110.9
181.0
120.8
186.6
179.7
205.9
203.7
119.0
198.8
114.0
152.4
135.7
146.9
142.3
122.8
122.8
120.4
116.4
125.5
119.8
158.5
155.9
97.7

139.7
161.7
162.1
157.6
187.1
110.5
181.4
120.8
186.8
180.0
206.4
204.1
122.2
199.0
114.0
153.0
136.3
136.1
143.5
122.0
121.5
119.1
114.2
125.7
119.9
156.2
153.3
96.9

139.6
163.0
162.4
156.5
180.5
112.1
181.7
121.3
186.8
180.9
206.5
204.4
122.6
199.0
115.0
158.6
142.2
131.6
150.3
121.9
118.7
116.2
110.4
122.9
118.5
155.7
152.8
96.9

137.5
162.3
162.3
156.2
179.4
111.6
182.1
121.4
187.0
181.4
207.2
204.8
125.0
199.4
115.4
158.9
142.4
129.6
150.6
121.9
115.2
113.4
105.0
120.3
116.9
155.5
152.5
96.3

138.9
162.6
162.1
157.7
179.7
110.0
182.4
121.6
186.9
181.6
207.7
205.3
125.2
199.9
115.7
158.7
141.9
129.6
150.1
121.4
116.1
112.9
106.9
122.9
117.2
157.1
154.2
95.7

138.5
162.8
162.1
157.6
180.0
111.3
182.7
122.0
187.7
181.6
207.6
205.8
119.8
200.4
115.8
159.1
142.3
129.4
150.6
121.0
121.0
116.5
114.5
126.5
119.6
158.1
155.3
94.4

139.8
162.5
162.1
159.6
179.0
111.2
183.3
122.5
188.1
181.3
208.3
206.1
121.7
201.0
116.0
154.3
137.0
130.7
144.6
120.9
123.9
120.0
118.2
127.7
121.1
155.4
152.5
93.5

137.3
161.6
161.4
157.3
178.3
109.5
183.7
122.9
188.8
180.9
208.2
206.6
116.2
201.4
114.4
152.3
134.7
134.4
141.9
120.7
122.6
121.1
115.3
125.0
120.4
153.6
150.8

169.
117.'
217.(
222.8
218.8
253.'

169.1
115.1
217.9
223.0
218.6
257.3

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR URBAN
WAGE EARNERS AND CLERICAL WORKERS

All items................
All Items (1967 - 100).....
Food and beverages........
Food.........................
Food at home............
Cereals and bakery products......
Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs....
Dairyand related products1.......
Fruits and vegetables........
Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage
materials.................
Other foods at home.............
Sugar and sweets.................
Fats and oils...................
Other foods...........
Other miscellaneous foods1,2....
Food away fromhome1...
Other food away fromhome1,2...
Alcoholic beverages..........
Housing................
Shelter...................
Rent of primary residence...........
Lodging away fromhome2........
Owners' equivalent rent of primary residence3
Tenants' and household insurance1,2
Fuels and utilities................
Fuels........................
Fuel oil and other fuels............
Gas (piped) and electricity.............
Household furnishings and operations.
Apparel..................
Men’s and boys' apparel.......
Women's and girls' apparel....
Infants' and toddlers' apparel1.......
Footwear.................
Transportation....................
Private transportation...........
Newand used motor vehicles2......
bee îootnotes at end of table.

102

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

177.0

516.8
173.0
172.5
172.4
193.6
161.2
167.1
210.8

176.5
175.1
197 1
162.0
167.2
222.9

138.4
159.1
155.6
155.4
176.3
109.1
173.8
113.6
178.8

138.6
160.4
158.8
155.3
177.6
109.7
178.2
118.1
183.3

194 5
191.5
118.4
187.6
106.4
149.5
134.2
129.2
141.5
125.8
126.1
125.8
117.3
130.9
123.1
153.6
150.8
101.9

201.9
199.0
118.4
195.1
108.7
142.9
126.1
115.0
133 4
124.4

114.0
197.4
1112
143.0
126.0
121.0
132.9
123.7

121.7
114.6
128.6

129.7

523.9

99.41

January 2004

174.5
198.2
162.1
166.9
218.0
138.6
160.7
158.2
153.4
111.0
179.7
120.0
184.6

197.1
162.3
167.2
222.9

177.7
529.2
177.4

179.2
533.7
178.3

161.5

164.5
167.1
140.1
161.9
161.3
158.7
178.5

160.6
158.9
110.7

110.1

120.1

120.2

180.5
I 00.0

176.9

177.9

203.7

98.7

109.6
198.0
112.3
143.5
126.4
125.0
133.2
123.0
120.9

202.6
114.3
198.5
113.7
128.3

134.7
123.2
117.3
115.7
112.3 106.7
127.2 122.4
120.8 119.5
153.0 154.6
152.0
98.51 98.2

185.7
178.7
205.5
203.0
198.6
113.9
130.5
123.5
119.4
116.8
111.0
119.3
158.2
155.7
97.9

Q3 1

32. Continued—Consumer Price Indexes for Ail Urban Consumers and for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers: U.S. city
average, by expenditure category and commodity or service group
[1 9 8 2 -8 4 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]

mual average
Series

1 Not seasonally adjusted.
2 Indexes on a December 1997 - 100 base.
3 Indexes on a December 1982 = 100 base.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2002

2003

2002
Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

May

Apr.

June

July

Sept.

Aug.

141.5 141.7 140.9
149.7 149.3 149.2
124.8 120.0 126.7
124.3 119.4 126.1
106.5 106.3 107.1
194.3 195.0 195.4
198.5 199.2 198.1
289.6 290.6 291.8
253.5 254.0 254.8
298.4 299.5 300.9
258.7 259.2 260.0
376.7 379.1 382.2
104.5 104.7 105.1
102.2 102.4 102.7
108.8 108.8 109.2
129.7 129.7 130.3
325.0 324.5 330.6
366.0 366.0 367.2
93.5
93.2
93.3
92.3
93.0
92.0
100.1 100.1 100.7

140.3
149.2
140.9
140.3
107.5
196.2
199.8
293.0
255.1
302.3
261.0
384.8
105.4
103.0
109.2
130.7
333.6
368.0
93.4
92.2
100.7

140.4
149.2
148.5
147.8
107.2
196.0
202.0
293.5
256.1
302.7
261.3
385.3
105.4
102.9
108.9
130.8
333.9
368.2
92.8
91.6
99.9

139.7
149.2
140.8
140.2
107.1
196.3
203.0
293.7
256.2
303.0
261.9
384.9
105.4
103.0
108.4
130.9
333.4
368.8
92.0
90.7
98.9

139.1
148.7
131.5
130.9
107.2
196.5
208.5
294.6
256.4
304.1
263.3
385.0
105.5
103.0
108.0
131.1
333.6
369.3
91.3
90.0
98.3

138.4
148.1
130.4
129.8
107.1
196.8
210.8
295.5
256.7
305.1
263.5
388.1
105.5
102.9
107.8
131.8
335.5
371.1
90.7
89.6
97.7

137.7
146.4
130.9
130.4
107.0
197.7
212.8
296.7
258.2
306.3
264.1
390.9
105.6
102.9
108.2
132.3
336.3
372.6
90.9
89.6
98.3

137.9
144.0
139.4
138.9
107.3
197.3
210.5
297.4
258.6
307.0
263.9
394.2
105.7
102.9
109.1
135.5
339.6
382.1
90.5
89.1
98.0

137.6
139.8
147.5
147.0
107.2
197.9
208.4
298.3
259.4
307.9
264.4
395.8
105.5
102.7
109.7
137.8
339.6
389.2
90.2
89.1
97.6

Oct.

Nov.

137.8 138.7
135.9 132.8
136.9 131.5
136.4 130.9
107.5 107.5
198.6 198.9
208.7 205.8
299.1 300.1
259.2 258.5
309.1 310.6
265.2 265.2
397.5 402.4
105.4 105.6
102.8 103.0
109.7 109.6
138.1 138.0
340.6 337.5
390.1 390.2
89.8
89.9
88.4
88.5
97.4
97.3

143.2
159.8
124.9
124.2
104.0
185.1
204.9
271.8
242.7
278.5
248.7
333.8
103.6
100.9
105.3
118.7
299.9
334.7
94.5
93.8
99.4

141.1
152.8
117.0
116.4
106.1
191.7
202.6
284.6
251.1
292.5
256.0
363.2
104.6
102.0
107.6
125.9
318.5
354.8
93.7
92.7
99.9

22.1

19.0

17.9

17.8

17.7

17.5

17.4

17.4

17.0

16.8

16.5

16.3

16.1

16.2

15.9

29.1
289.5
426.1
170.3
155.7
184.9
262.8

21.8
302.0
463.2
174.1
155.5
189.1
274.0

19.7
305.0
472.8
174.9
155.0
190.6
276.6

19.3
305.1
474.3
174.7
154.2
190.7
276.7

19.1
305.6
474.3
175.2
154.8
189.1
277.9

18.6
306.4
474.8
175.7
154.0
191.6
279.9

18.6
305.6
469.1
176.1
153.8
192.4
281.1

18.5
306.4
469.8
176.7
154.6
193.2
281.6

17.8
306.0
464.8
176.9
154.2
193.6
282.4

16.9
306.0
464.8
177.2
154.4
193.5
283.9

16.9
307.5
470.5
177.5
154.8
193.9
284.0

16.3
308.0
473.2
177.4
154.3
194.6
284.4

16.0
307.9
469.9
177.9
154.0
196.1
285.2

16.2
308.2
470.7
178.0
154.1
196.3
285.6

16.0
307.7
470.2
177.7
153.8
194.8
286.7

151.4
173.0
138.7
149.0
126.1

150.4
176.1
135.5
147.0
123.1

151.3
176.6
136.5
150.2
124.6

150.3
177.1
135.0
147.3
120.9

150.7
177.4
135.5
148.3
117.3

152.8
178.3
138.0
153.8
119.4

154.0 153.0
178.5 178.3
139.6 138..2
157.3 154.8
122.5 122.8

151.6
178.7
136.0
151.1
121.5

151.1
179.5
135.0
149.6
118.7

150.7
179.6
134.2
148.7
115.2

151.6
180.2
135.4
151.7
116.1

152.7
180.7
136.7
155.9
121.0

151.9
181.7
135.2
153.6
123.9

151.3
182.4
133.8
151.4
122.6

166.3
125.3
199.6
187.3
199.1
233.7

165.3
121.8
205.9
194.5
207.7
241.6

169.6
120.6
208.1
196.2
211.4
244.8

167.2
120.4
208.3
196.3
211.7
245.1

171.0
120.1
209.4
197.3
212.2
246.2

178.7
119.9
210.2
197.9
213.2
247.1

182.6
119.8
211.2
198.3
213.9
247.0

178.3
119.4
211.3
198.3
215.0
246.8

173.0
118.8
212.0
198.8
216.1
246.8

172.3
118.3
212.6
198.8
216.7
247.2

173.0
117.6
213.6
199.5
217.4
247.9

177.4
116.9
214.0
200.0
216.8
249.2

181.2
115.5
214.3
199.9
216.8
250.6

175.7
114.7
214.4
200.6
219.0
250.7

172.9
114.2
214.1
200.5
218.8
250.7

173.6
167.6
169.1
140.2
150.6
166.7
161.4

175.8
168.3
171.1
137.3
149.2
166.1
161.4
193.1
198.9
120.9
183.6
185.6
144.4
17..
213.<

177.6
169.7
172.6
138.6
152.6
170.2
163.«
195.
200.
124.
184.
187.3
144.
125.2
216.5

177.C
169.1
172.1
136.8
149.6
168.C
162.6
195.Î
201.
122.
184.
186.
143.
120.7
216.7

177.7
169.7
172.7
137.1
150.6
171.6
163.6
196.'
202.
126.
184.
186.
142.
127.B
217.7

179.C
171.6
174.2
139.“
155.6
178.'
166.6
197.«
202.
135.
185.
187.
142.3
142.
218.5

180.6
172.9
175.4
141.4
159.2
182.2
168.6
199.6
204.C
142.2
185.$
188.C
143.
150.(
218. 31

180.C
172.2
174.8
140.C
156.8
178.'
167.1
199.'
204.C
137.'
185.
188.
143.
141.
219.D

179.8
171.4
174.'
137.$
153.2
173.8
165.,
200.'
204.
133.
185.
188.3
142.2
132.3
219.6

179.8
171.'
174..
136.<
151.
172.
164.
202.
205.2
135.B
185.9
187.7
141.3
131.0
219.8

179.6 180.2
171.5 172.C
174.5 175.2
136.1 137.2
151.C 151-C
173.5 177.5
164.6 166.'
202.6 203.
206.2 206.f
135.8 140.(
185.S 186.
187.
187.
140.
140.
131.' 139.5
221.3
220.

181.0
173.2
176.C
138.6
157.2
181.1
168.6
203.'
206.6
144.2
186.'
188.
140.,
147.,
221.

180.4
172.6
175.6
137.C
155.7
176.1
168.1
203.2
206.$
136.:
187.6
188.6
140.
137.
222.

179.7
171.6
175.C
135.6
153.'
173.6
167.:
202.'
206.
132.'
187.
188.
139.
132.
222.

cc
CC

Newvehicles....................................
Used cars and trucks1.........................
Motor fuel..........................................
Gasoline (all types)............................
Motor vehicle parts and equipment..........
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair.......
Public transportation..............................
Medical care..........................................
Medical care commodities.......................
Medical care services............................
Professional services...........................
Hospital and related services.................
Recreation2..........................................
Video and audio1'2...............................
Education and communication2..................
Education2 ........................................
Educational books and supplies............
Tuition, other school fees, and childcare..
Communication1,2...............................
. 12
Information and information processing
’
Telephone services1'2 ......................
Information and information processing
other than telephone services1 4 ........
Personal computers and peripheral
equipment1’2...........................
Other goods and services.........................
Tobacco and smoking products...............
Personal care1....................................
Personal care products1......................
Personal care services1......................
Miscellaneous personal services...........
Commodity and service group:
Commodities.......................................
Food and beverages............................
Commodities less food and beverages......
Nondurables less food and beverages.....
Apparel........................................
Nondurables less food, beverages,
and apparel..................................
Durables.........................................
Services............................................
Rent of shelter3.................................
Transportation services.....................
Other services..................................
Special Indexes:
All items less food..............................
All items less shelter...........................
All Items less medical care...................
Commodities less food........................
Nondurables less food........................
Nondurables less food and apparel........
Nondurables....................................
Services less rent of shelter3................
Services less medical care services.......
Energy.......................................... .
All items less energy..........................
All items less food and energy.............
Commodities less food and energy.....
Energy commodities......................
Services less energy......................

301

193.
128."
179.
181.
146.
125.
206.D

4 Indexes on a December 1988 » 100 base.
Dash indicates data not available.
NOTE: Index appliedto a month as a whole, not to any specific date.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

103

Current Labor Statistics:

33.

Price Data

Consumer Price Index: U.S. city average and available local area data: all items

[1982-84 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]
Pricing

All Urban Consum ers

sched-

2 003

ule1

U.S. city average..........................

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

U rban W age E arners
2003

Oct.

Nov.

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

183.7

183.9

184.6

185.2

185.0

184.5

M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M

192.8
194.9
113.9
178.4
180.7
113.2
172.6
177.2
179.0
113.1
174.9
188.1
190.9
114.4

193.5
195.5
114.5
178.1
180.5
113.1
171.4
177.3
179.1
113.1
175.0
188.4
190.9
115.1

194.3
196.6
114.4
178.8
181.2
113.6
172.1
177.9
179.8
113.4
175.9
189.2
191.7
115.5

195.0
197.3
115.0
179.5
182.0
113.9
172.3
178.3
180.1
113.8
176.3
189.6
192.3
115.6

195.4
197.7
115.2
179.1
181.7
113.6
171.8
178.1
180.1
113.6
175.6
189.4
191.9
115.5

195.1 189.2
197.3 190.0
115.3 113.9
178.9 173.7
181.4 175.1
113.6 112.7
171.4 170.1
177.5 174.3
179.1 176.2
113.3 112.0
175.4 174.8
188.5 183.3
191.0 184.5
114.9 114.1

190.0 190.7 191.9 192.1 191.9
190.8 191.8 193.0 193.2 192.8
114.5 114.5 115.1 115.3 115.4
173.3 174.1 174.6 174.1 173.9
174.8 175.5 176.4 176.0 175.7
112.5 113.0 113.2 112.7 112.7
169.1 169.8
170 169.3 169.1
174.3 174.8 175.3 174.9 174.3
176.2 177.0 177.5 177.3 176.4
111.9 112.1 112.4 112.1 111.9
174.6 174.5 175.9 174.8 174.5
183.4 184.2 185.0 184.4 183.5
184.3 185.3 186.1 185.4 184.4
114.6 114.8 115.3 115.0 114.6

M
M
M

168.2
113.4
176.4

168.3
113.6
184.1

169.0
113.9
177.1

169.6
114.3
177.4

169.5
114.1
176.9

168.9
113.9
176.6

166.3
112.9
174.4

M
M
M
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

184.1 184.1
186.3 186.3
196.9 197.7
- 203.0
- 176.0
“ 176.5
116.8
181.5
182.8
162.5
179.4
189.7
196.3
_
191.7

179.6

179.6

180.3

181.0

180.7

R e gio n a n d a re a s ize 2

Northeast urban.........................................
Size A—More than 1,500,000...................
Size B/C—50,000 to 1,500,0003................
Midwest urban4..........................................
Size A—More than 1,500,000....................
Size B/C—50,000 to 1,500,0003.................
Size D—Nonmetropolitan (less than 50,000).
South urban..............................................
Size A—More than 1,500,000....................
Size B/C—50,000 to 1,500,0003................
Size D—Nonmetropolitan (less than 50,000)..
West urban...............................................
Size A—More than 1,500,000....................
Size B/C—50,000 to 1,500,0003.................
Size classes:
A5....................
B/C
D....

Nov.

M

166.3
112.8
174.9

167.2
113.1
175.3

168.0
113.5
175.6

167.7
113.2
174.9

180.2

167.1
113.0
174.5

S e le c te d local a re a s 6

Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............................
Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..................
New York, NY-Northern NJ-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA.
Boston-Brockton-Nashua, MA-NH-ME-CT.................
Cleveland-Akron, OH.............................................
Dallas-Ft Worth, TX.................................................
Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV7....................
Atlanta, GA............................................................
Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, Ml........................................
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX................................
Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL..........................................
Philadelphia-Wilmington-AtlanticCity, PA-NJ-DE-MD....
San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.........................
Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA..........................

goods and services priced as indicated:
M—Every month.
1—January, March, May, July, September, and November.
2—
February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2 Regions defined as the four Census regions.
3 Indexes on a December 1996 = 100 base.
The "North Central" region has been renamed the "Midwest" region by the
Census Bureau. It is composed of the same geographic entities.
5 Indexes on a December 1986 = 100 base.
6 In addition, the following metropolitan areas are published semiannually and
appear in tables 34 and 39 of the January and July issues of the CPI D e ta ile d

104

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

184.5 186.1 186.1 185.6 178.0 177.8 178.3 179.8 179.1 179.1
186.9 188.2 187.8 187.1 179.6 179.6 180.5 181.9 181.2 180.5
199.1 199.6 200.0 199.4 191.9 192.8 194.1 195.0 195.2 194.7
- 206.8
_ 205.6
- 206.5
- 202.2
206.2
- 178.5
_ 168.3
- 177.6
- 167.0
169.5
- 177.0
_ 175.6
- 1175.9
- 175.9
176.7
- 117.2
_ 116.1
- 116.7
- 116.2
- 116.9
179.7
_ 177.6
- 180.1
- 178.7
179.4
183.6
_ 178.2
- 183.3
- 176.7
177.5
164.1
_ 164.0
- 166.1
- 160.7
- 162.5
180.9
_ 179.0
- 181.6
- 176.8
178.3
191.1
_ 190.2
- 190.3
- 187.8
189.2
196.3
“ 196.3
- 192.2
- 192.3
- 191.9
194.4
193.7
185.7
188.2
187.8
Report: Anchorage, AK; Cincinnati OH-KY-IN; Kansas City, MO-KS; Milwaukee-Racine,
Wl; Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI; Pittsburgh, PA; Port-land-Salem, OR-WA; St Louis,
MO-IL; San Diego, CA; Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL.
7 Indexes on a November 1996 = 100 base.

NOTE: Local area CPI indexes are byproducts of the national CPI program. Each local
index has a smaller sample size and is, therefore, subject to substantially more sampling
and other measurement error. As a result, local area indexes show greater volatility than
the national index, although their long-term trends are similar. Therefore, the Bureau of
Labor Statistics strongly urges users to consider adopting the national average CPI for use
in their escalator clauses. Index applies to a month as a whole, not to any specific date.
Dash indicates data not available.

34.

Annual data: Consumer Price Index, U.S. city average, all items and major groups

[1

= 1UUJ
Series

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers:
All items:
Food and beverages:
Housing:
Apparel:
Transportation:
Medical care:
Other goods and services:

Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners
and Clerical Workers:
All items:
Percent change............................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2001

2000

2002

144.5
3.0

148.2
2.6

152.4
2.8

156.9
3.0

160.5
2.3

163.0
1.6

166.6
2.2

172.2
3.4

177.1
2.8

179.9
1.6

141.6
2.1

144.9
2.3

148.9
2.8

153.7
3.2

157.7
2.6

161.1
2.2

164.6
2.2

168.4
2.3

173.6
3.1

176.8
1.8

141.2
2.7

144.8
2.5

148.5
2.6

152.8
2.9

156.8
2.6

160.4
2.3

163.9
2.2

169.6
3.5

176.4
4.0

180.3
2.2

133.7
1.4

133.4
-.2

132.0
-1.0

131.7
-.2

132.9
.9

133.0
.1

131.3
-1.3

129.6
-1.3

127.3
-1.8

124.0
-2.6

130.4
3.1

134.3
3.0

139.1
3.6

143.0
2.8

144.3
0.9

141.6
-1.9

144.4
2.0

153.3
6.2

154.3
0.7

152.9
-.9

201.4
5.9

211.0
4.8

220.5
4.5

228.2
3.5

234.6
2.8

242.1
3.2

250.6
3.5

260.8
4.1

272.8
4.6

285.6
4.7

192.9
5.2

198.5
2.9

206.9
4.2

215.4
4.1

224.8
4.4

237.7
5.7

258.3
8.7

271.1
5.0

282.6
4.2

293.2
3.8

142.1
2.8

145.6
2.5

149.8
2.9

154.1
2.9

157.6
2.3

159.7
1.3

163.2
2.2

168.9
3.5

173.5
2.7

175.9
1.4

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

105

Current Labor Statistics:

35.

Price Data

Producer Price indexes, by stage of processing

[1982 = 100]_______
Grouping

Annua average
2001

2002

2002
Nov.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

139.0
139.6
139.5

140.8
141.9
142.0

142.3
144.0
142.3

144.2
146.3
142.8

142.1
143.8
144.0

142.0
143.7
144.6

143.0
145.0
145.2

143.0
145.1
144.9

143.5
145.7
146.2

143.9
146.3
147.9

145.5
147.7
151.0

144.5
146.5
150.2

139.3
140.6
132.8

141.6
143.8
133.2
139.3

144.4
147.9
133.1
139.2

147.4
151.7
134.4
139.9

143.5
146.9
132.5
139.1

143.0
146.3
132.4
139.0

144.6
148.9
131.8
138.9

144.8
149.2
131.7
138.9

145.1
149.7
131.6
139.3

145.3
150.2
131.1
139.1

146.1
149.2
135.5
141.1

144.7
147.4
135.1
140.7

129.4

131.1

133.5

136.2

133.0

132.5

133.5

133.7

134.0

134.1

134.1

'134.0

127.9
128.9
133.4
126.1
125.8

129.5
129.6
138.1
126.8
125.8

130.1
129.0
140.1
126.9
126.0

129.4
129.6
137.6
126.7
126.0

129.3
130.8
137.0
128.8
126.1

129.6
134.2
137.4
126.8
126.0

129.2
133.3
136.3
127.1
125.8

130.0
135.5
137.9
127.9
125.9

129.8
137.1
136.3
128.9
125.9

130.5
142.0
137.1
129.6
125.8

130,7
142.0
137.4
130.5
125.7

151.4
106.9
153.4
140.1

152.1
113.6
15*3.7
140.7

152.3
124.8
153.8
141.2

152.9
110.8
154.0
141.3

152.9
108.0
153.9
141.5

153.0
112.1
154.1
141.5

153.6
113.7
153.8
141.5

153.8
113.6
153.6
141.4

155.1
113.3
153.6
141.7

155.2
111.9
153.2
141.8

155.6
109.7
153.5
142.6

127.3
105.6
140.4

134.0
106.3
151.7

152.2
105.7
184.4

128.0
107.0
140.6

130.9
111.0
142.4

136.5
110.4
152.8

132.6
107.6
148.2

131.4
111.5
142.9

135.6
118.7
144.5

138.3
127.9
141.9

137.4
126.1
141.9

140.3
95.3
147.9
151.5
150.3

142.1
101.7
147.9
151.6
151.0

144.3
107.4
148.6
152.3
151.0

141.5
100.0
148.2
152.1
150.0

141.1
98.9
148.3
152.3
150.0

142.2
103.1
148.3
152.4
149.8

142.2
103.4
148.2
152.3
149.8

142.6
104.3
148.7
152.7
149.9

142.6
105.0
149.0
153.3
149.7

143.8
103.2
151.4
155.9
152.0

142.8
100.3
151.0
155.5
151.7

156.9

157.7

157.6

158.4

157.4

157.4

157.1

157.1

157.0

156.9

159.2

159.0

175.1

177.4

177.3

177.7

177.5

177.6

177.7

177.8

177.6

177.8

178.1

178.2

118.8
100.0
135.5

131.7
120.4
105.8
136.1

134.2
121.2
113.2
137.1

137.0
121.0
124.2
137.6

133.7
121.2
110.1
137.3

133.1
122.8
107.1
137.5

134.0
125.1
111.3
137.6

134.2
124.4
113.0
137.4

134.6
125.1
113.5
137.7

134.5
128.0
112.4
138.0

134.4
131.7
111.1
138.5

134.1
134.8
109.0
138.9

137.1

138.1

138.7

138.4

138.5

138.4

138.3

138.6

138.8

139.0

139.2

10>10
110.5
139.9

140.1
115.1
143.0

153.9
116.9
148.3

200.2
H6.5
148.1

138.8 141.4
117.0 120.0
146.7 I 146.5

156.2 148.7
119.4 118.0
146.3 | 148.8

139.9
121.7
152.0

140.7
127.9

135.7
135.5
158.8

133.6
135.5
163.7

Finished goods....................

Finishedconsumer goods.....
Finishedconsumer foods....
Finshedconsumer goods
excluding foods..........
Nondurable goods less food.....
Durable goods.........
Capital equipment...............

2003

Dec.

141 5
141.3

139.4
140.0

141.4
14? ft
133.9
139.7

139.8

142.0

139.1

ijy.u

128.7

127.8

June

Interm ediate materials,
supplies, and com ponents.......................

Materials and components
for manufacturing..................
Materials forfood manufacturing...
Materials for nondurable manufacturing..
Materials fordurable manufacturing.....
Components for manufacturing....
Materials and components
forconstruction................
Processed fuels and lubricants.....
Containers...............
Supplies.......................

_

127.4
124.3
131.8
125.2
126.3

126.1
123.2
129.2
124.7
126.1

125.0
132.8
126.3
126.0

131.4
126.2
125.9

150.6
104.5
153.1
138.6

96.3

151.2
101.2

151.1
100.9
139.6

July

Aug.p Sept.p

Oct.p

Nov.p

Crude m aterials for further
processing...................................

Foodstuffs and feedstuffs.......
Crude nonfood materials........

121.3
106.2
127.3

99.5
111.4

140.4
96.8
147.5
150.8
150.0

138.3
88.8
147.3
150.8
150.2

99.4

100.5

Special groupings:

Finished goods, excluding foods...
Finished energy goods.........
Finished goods less energy.........
Finished consumer goods less energy
Finished goods less food and energy.....
Finished consumer goods less food
and energy.................
Consumer nondurable goods less food
and energy.............
Intermediate materials less foods
and feeds............
Intermediate foods andfeeds...
Intermediate energy goods......
Intermediate goods less energy.....
Intermediate materials less foods
and energy...............

136.4

Crude energy materials............
Crude materials less energy.........
Crude nonfood materials less energy

122.8
112.2
130.6

106

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

130.5
115.9
104.1
135.1

115.5
95.9
134.5

139.6
147.6
151.0
150.9

117.5
101.0
135.5

150.2
149.9

1or t
102.0
108.7
135.7

120.0
109.8
139.8

January 2004

36. Producer Price Indexes for the net output of major industry groups
[December 1984 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]__________
>001

Total mining industries....................... .

Metal mining.............................
Coal mining (12/85 - 100)............
OHand gas extraction (12/85 - 100)..
Mining and quarrying of nonmetalllc
minerals, except fuels................
Total manufacturing industries..................

Food and kindred products..................
Tobacco manufactures.......................
Textile mill products..........................
Apparel and other finished products
made fromfabrics and similar materials..
Lumber and wood products,
except furniture..............................
Furniture and fixtures........................
Paper and allied products...................
Printing, publishing, and allied Industries--Chemicals and allied products..................
Petroleumrefining and related products.....
Rubber and miscellaneous plastics producís.
Leather and leather products...................
Stone, clay, glass, and concrete products...
Primary metal Industries........................
Fabricated metal products,
except machinery andtransportation
equipment......................

39

Machinery, except electrical...................
Electrical and electronic machinery,
equipment, and supplies......................
Transportation........................... ........
Measuring and controlling instruments;
photographic, medical, and optical
goods; watches and clocks...................
Miscellaneous manufacturing Industries
Industries (12/85 - 100)......................

2003

2002

Annual average
Industry

SIC

Nov.

2002

Feb.

Jan.

Dec.

123.2
84.0
95.0
147.0

122.1
86.0
94.8
145.1

146.4 146.6 146.7
136.3 135.8 136.3 136.4
135.1 135.7 137.1 137.0
375.5 376.4 376.1 376.2
115.2 115.3 115.4 115.3

146.7

146.9

141.0

143.5

134.6
132.8
386.1
116.9

133.7 134.6 134.0 135.7 137.6 138.7
132.0 131.6 132.6 133.9 134.5 134.8
401.9 409.2 380.3 379.7 379.8 380.9
115.8 115.8 116.1 115.3 115.2 115.1

125.8

125.1

125.1

156.2
145.1
146.2

155.3
146.3
143.7

154.1 154.2 154.4 155.7
147.0 146.8 147.0 147.1
145.1 144.9 144.8 144.9

188.7
158.4
105.3
125.9
141.3
136.0
116.1

193.0 194.0
157.3 159.7
98.8 106.7
125.5 125.8
141.1 142.1
137.1 137.3
116.2 118.3

194.1
159.3
102.4
125.8
142.5
137.3
118.1

196.4
160.9
116.5
126.3
142.4
137.6
117.9

196.7
162.3
138.0
127.2
142.4
137.8
118.0

131.0

131.7

132.0

132.2

132.4

118.0

117.2

116.6

116.5

116.5

107.0
137.9

105.7
137.3

105.0 104.3
138.3 137.6

127.3

128.5

128.8

132.4

133.3

133.5

123.1
143.4
129 8
157.2
110.3

124.5 125.9
150.2 155.0
134.6 141.3
157.8 159.4
111.9 112.3

144.9

145.4

Nov.p

126.2
83.1
94.3
152.0

96.6 110.5 113.8 126.0 137.4
78.5
93.6 74.2 74.5 78.0.
93.9 93.6 93.1 93.2 93.4
107.0 128.8 133.9 152.5 170.2
144.2

Aug.p Sept.p Oct.p

July

169.1 124.5 126.3 137.1 131.6 125.2
76.8 73.9 77.8 80.1 80.6 80.6
93.7 94.8 94.6 94.4 94.0 94.0
220.0 150.2 152.7 169.3 160.7 150.7

114.3
70.8
91.3
127.5

143.8

June

May

Mar. I Apr.

145.9 146.3

147.0

147.4

137.0 137.1 138.3
137.7 138.8 141.6
376.3 376.8 378.7
115.7 115.5 116.6

137.7
141.6
379.2
116.2

124.9

124.9

124.9

124.8

124.9

124.9

125.0

124.9

155.3 156.0
147.2 147.3
144.9 145.1

156.4
147.4
145.3

157.2
147.5
145.1

160.2
147.6
144.9

160.9
147.5
144.7

166.8
147.6
144.6

167.4
147.9
144.3

168.0
147.8
144.6

196.7
165.2
145.9
128.1
142.4
137.7
118.0

197.0 197.3
166.7 165.8
118.7 111.0
129.1 129.2
142.7 142.2
138.1 138.0
117.8 117.8

197.6
165.0
116.0
128.8
142.7
137.7
117.8

197.6
164.5
118.3
128.6
142.9
137.8
117.7

197.8 197.9 198.2
164.5 164.5 164.9
124.0 122.1 121.1
128.8 128.6 128.5
142.5 142.6 143.2
138.0 138.1 137.9
118.1 118.3 119.0

198.2
165.1
115.8
128.4
143.7
138.4
119.9

132.5

132.7

132.7

132.7

132.7

132.9

132.9

133.1

133.2

133.1

116.2

116.0

116.1

116.0

116.0

117.2

116.8

116.8

116.0

115.8

104.2
138.1

103.8 104.0 104.0 104.0
138.3 139.8 137.5 137.5

103.6
136.8

103.3
136.8

102.5
137.0

102.3
136.5

102.2
141.4

102.1
140.9

128.8

129.4

129.8

129.7

129.9

129.8

129.9

129.8

130.0

129.9

130.2

129.9

133.8

133.7

134.0

133.8

133.9

133.9

133.9

134.1

134.3

134.2

134.0

134.0

127.4 128.1 128.3 128.7
155.0 155.0 155.0 155.0
147.6 151.1 151.1 151.7
162.3 162.6 162.9 162.9
111.9 112.0 111.9 112.2

128.6
155.0
151.7
164.1
112.1

128.8
155.0
149.2
153.6
112.0

124.8

124.7

124.7

124.9

Service industries:

Motor freight transportation
and warehousing (06/93 - 100)..............
U.S. Postal Service (06/89 - 100)............
Watertransportation (12/92 - 100)...........
Transportation by air (12/92 - 100)...........
Pipelines, except natural gas (12/92 - 10C)..

125.9 126.5 126.8 127.3 127.4 127.4
155.0 155.0 155.0 155.0 155.0 155.0
142.2 142.9 140.7 140.9 139.9 147.6
159.8 161.4 160.2 161.8 162.2 162.0
111.8 110.6 110.6 111.0 110.6 111.8

37. Annual data: Producer Price Indexes, by stage of processing
[1982 = 100]_____________________________ ________ ________ ________ ___
Index

1993

1994

1995

1996

F in is h e d goods

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

124.7
125.7
78.0
135.8

125.5
126.8
77.0
137.1

127.9
129.0
78.1
140.0

131.3
133.6
83.2
142.0

131.8
134.5
83.4
142.4

130.7
134.3
75.1
143.7

133.0
135.1
78.8
146.1

138.0
137.2
94.1
148.0

140.7
141.3
96.8
15U.0

138.8
140.0
88.8
150.2

116.2
115.6
84.6
123.8

118.5
118.5
83.0
127.1

124.9
119.5
84.1
135.2

125.7
125.3
89.8
134.0

125.6
123.2
89.0
134.2

123.0
123.2
80.8
133.5

123.2
120.8
84.3
133.1

129.2
119.2
101.7
136.6

129.7
124.3
104.1
136.4

127.8
123.3
95.9
135.8

102.4
108.4
76.7
94.1

101.8
106.5
72.1
97.0

102.7
105.8
69.4
105.8

113.8
121.5
85.0
105.7

111.1
112.2
87.3
103.5

96.8
103.9
68.6
84.5

98.2
98.7
78.5
91.1

120.6
100.2
122.1
118.0

121.3
106.2
122.8
101.8

108.1
99.5
101.8
100.8

In te rm e d ia te m a terials, s u p p lie s , and
c o m p o n e n ts

C ru d e m a te ria ls fo r fu rth e r pro ce ssin g


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

107

Current Labor Statistics:

38.

Price Data

U.S. export price indexes by Standard International Trade Classification

[2000 = 100]_________________

SITC
Rev. 3

2002

Industry

Nov.

Food and live animals.......
01 Meat and meat preparations...
04
C erea ls a n d cereal preparations..
05 Vegetables, fruit, and nuts, prepared fresh or dry

108

87.8
131.7
98.9

2003

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

July

Aug.

123.2
97.4

105.9
96.4
122.2
95.1

105.5
97.9
120.0
96.0

108.0
101.5
124.2
96.9

107.5
102.9
118.5
99.6

107.1
104.6
115.4
101.2

107.6
108.9
115.7
99.7

112.2
117.3
124.1
101.2

111.9
122.7
119.5
102.3

115.3
125.2
125.6
101.8

116.6
91.1
86.4
101.6
104.6

102.3
116.6
91.2
88.9
105.0
105.8

103.6
118.9
91.3
90.4
106.0
107.8

104.5
127.4
91.0
89.9
104.2
105.8

103.9
122.7
90.4
90.1
103.2
109.0

103.9
124.8
90.6
85.5
106.2
112.3

102.3
109.2
90.9
85.3
107.0
117.8

106.3
121.1
91.7
88.9
109.6
120.1

111.1
136.7
91.9
91.0
121.4
121.1

116.0
150.9
92.4
92.2
130.0
126.5

113.7
122.9

130.1
113.9
130.2

107.5
111.9
102.8

102.5
112.2
96.4

107.6
112.1
102.7

109.8
111.2
105.9

114.9
111.2
113.0

108.7
111.6
104.2

107.9
111.6
104.1

106.2
111.6
101.2

96.0
97.1
97.5
100.6

100.6
104.1
96.2
99.5
97.2
100.7

101.4
103.9
95.3
100.5
98.4
101.5

100.9
103.9
95.2
97.6
98.5
100.9

100.8
104.8
97.3
96.6
98.8
101.6

99.6
105.8
97.5
95.1
98.4
102.0

100.0
105.5
97.6
94.8
98.4
101.9

100.0
105.3
97.8
95.3
98.1
101.8

100.5
105.6
99.4
95.3
98.3
102.4

100.9
106.2
99.5
95.2
97.8
102.7

99.4
108.4

99.8
108.6

99.7
108.5

100.0
110.1

99.9
110.1

100.0
109.5

100.1
109.2

100.3
109.4

100.6
109.9

96.7
100.2
84.3
98.5
106.9
102.2

96.9
100.3
82.0

97.3
100.3
79.4

98.3
100.2
80.9
97.9
107.4
103.2

97.8
107.3
103.1

97.5
99.5
82.0
97.8
107.9
103.1

98.0
99.6
82.9

98.5
107.1
102.4

98.5
100.4
79.8
98.0
107.4
103.2

98.4
99.5
81.6

98.5
107.1
102.5

98.3
100.4
80.3
97.8
107.2
102.6

97.9
108.5
103.3

102.1
88.6

102.2
88.8

102.2
88.9

102.4
88.1

102.5
88.2

102.5
88.0

102.7
87.7

102.6
87.8

102.8
87.8

95.0
92.2
100.9

94.2
92.1
101.1

94.1
92.0
101.0

93.8
89.7
101.1

93.4
89.8
101.3

93.4
89.8
101.3

93.4
89.4
101.3

93.6
88.7
101.5

93.4
88.5
101.6

101.5 I 101.6

101.9

102.2

102.4

102.3 I 102.2

102.1

102.3

90.3
98.3

2 Crude materials, inedible, except fuels
22 Oilseeds and oleaginous fruits...
24 Corkand wood........
25 Pulpand waste paper.........
26 Textile fibers and theirwaste......
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap

98 8
116.9

91.8

96.3

3 Mineral fuels, lubricants, and related products
32 Coal, coke, and briquettes.....
33 Petroleum, petroleumproducts, and related materials...
5 Chemicals and related products, n.e.s.
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products
55 Essential oils; polishing and cleaning preparations
57 Plastics inprimaryforms...
58 Plastics innonprimaryforms...
59 Chemical materials and products, n.e.s...................

104.5
114.0
99.6

99.5

100.6

98.5

92.2

112.0
108.1

96.8
101.2
97.2
93.5
97.7
98.5

96.6
101.2
97.3
98.8

100.6

6 Manufactured goods classified chiefly by materials
99.0
62 Rubber manufactures, n.e.s....
105.4
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of paper, pulp,
and paperboard........
66 Nonmetallic mineral manufactures, n.e.s.................. 101.3
68 Nonferrous metals.......
7 Machinery and transport equipment......
98.7
71 Power generating machinery and equipment
105.2
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries
101.7
74 General industrial machines and parts, n.e.s.,
and machine parts........
75 Computer equipment and office machines....
88.6
76 Telecommunications and sound recording and
reproducing apparatus and equipment..
96.3
77 Electrical machinery and equipment..
93.4
78 Road vehicles............
87 Professional, scientific, and controlling
instruments and apparatus.......
101.5 I

99.0

99.0

99.4
108.8

101.3

100.5

100.4
83.3

98.5
105.1
101.7

98.6
106.5
102.2

98.6
106.8

88.6

88.8

96.2
92.9

95.4

101.7

101.9

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

95.4
oD.1

102.3

101.9

June

Nov

39.

U.S. import price indexes by Standard International Trade Classification

[2000 = 100]_____________________________________
2003

2002
Industry

Rev. 3

Food and live animals...............................................

Meat and meat preparations..........................
Fish and crustaceans, mollusks, and ottier
aquatic invertebrates................... .............
Vegetables, fruit, and nuts, prepared fresh or dry..
Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures
thereof..................................................
1 Beverages and tobacco..

11

Beverages...............
Crude materials, inedible, except fuels...........

Corkand wood.....................................
Pulpandwaste paper.............................
Metalliferous ores and metal scrap............
Crude animal and vegetable materials, n.e.s.
Mineral fuels, lubricants, and related products...........

Petroleum, petroleumproducts, and related materials..
Gas, natural and manufactured............................
Chemicals and related products, n.e.s....................

Inorganic chemicals......................................
Dying, tanning, and coloring materials................
Medicinal and pharmaceutical products..............
Essential oils; polishing andcleaning preparations..
Plastics inprimary forms................................
Plastics in nonprimary forms........... ...............
Chemical materials and products, n.e.s..............
Manufactured goods classified chiefly by materials....,

Rubber manufactures, n.e.s................. ...............
Paper, paperboard, and articles of paper, pulp,
and paperboard..............................................
Nonmetallic mineral manufactures, n.e.s.................
Nonferrous metals............................................
Manufactures of metals, n.e.s..............................
Machinery and transport equipment...................

Machinery specialized for particular industries...
General Industrial machines and parts, n.e.s.,
and machine parts.................................
Computer equipment and office machines......
Telecommunications and sound recording and
reproducing apparatus and equipment.........
Electrical machinery and equipment.............
Road vehicles........................................
85 Footwear...................................................
88 Photographic apparatus, equipment, and supplies,
I and optical goods, n.e.s...............................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

June

July

Sept.

Aug.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

97.6
101.2

98.8
106.8

100.4
101.7

100.0
107.4

101.2
108.5

101.6
108.8

99.8
110.3

99.4
102.9

100.2
106.6

99.5
108.2

100.1
112.8

100.3
116.0

99.7
117.1

82.0
106.2

82.5
105.6

81.1
111.5

82.0
104.7

81.4
110.7

84.3
108.5

83.4
103.9

81.3
108.9

83.5
106.9

82.3
105.5

82.4
104.9

79.7
106.3

78.8
108.3

98.6

99.9

104.0

106.7

100.2

100.5

99.1

94.8

95.3

96.6

98.6

95.5

93.1

103.9
103.7

104.1
104.0

104.0
103.9

104.1
104.0

104.4
104.3

104.4
104.3

Nov.

102.5
102.2

102.7
102.4

103.0
102.3

103.3
102.7

104.0
103.0

104.5
103.6

104.6
103.8

94.9
96.0
80.5
93.9
99.9

94.5
94.0
78.9
94.7
101.4

95.2
94.7
77.9
95.5
103.6

97.4
96.8
80.3
99.1
102.3

98.5
95.0
86.5
99.9
102.6

98.4
93.4
92.6
99.5
102.3

98.8
94.0
95.3
99.3
103.5

99.5
94.4
95.3
99.7
104.9

100.7
100.1
93.6
100.3
99.4

100.5
99.3
91.9
102.9
96.8

105.2
112.9
85.6
103.6
95.7

104.3
105.7
91.5
104.0
95.1

105.6
102.5
93.3
108.2
94.5

90.4
89.8
92.1

94.9
94.2
97.0

109.6
108.1
117.8

121.2
119.8
129.3

126.0
118.1
185.9

101.6
98.6
120.5

96.0
92.6
119.0

101.7
97.6
130.1

106.0
103.4
121.5

106.5
105.6
108.8

101.5
99.3
114.4

101.0
99.8
106.2

101.8
100.8
104.8

98.0
102.5
95.9
99.3
98.8
96.0
99.5
90.8

98.2
102.5
96.7
99.2
99.2
94.8
99.6
91.6

99.1
104.2
96.5
101.8
97.2
97.3
100.2
92.1

99.8
106.5
97.5
101.5
97.9
97.9
100.1
93.1

101.1
110.8
97.6
101.3
98.4
99.3
100.4
97.6

100.4
107.5
97.8
101.5
99.2
99.5
100.6
96.7

99.0
105.8
98.0
101.2
98.9
101.7
100.8
93.2

100.1
106.4
98.0
102.5
99.4
106.1
100.8
92.3

100.0
105.4
98.0
103.1
99.0
104.3
101.3
93.3

99.2
106.0
98.3
102.5
91.8
103.1
101.4
91.9

99.3
105.4
98.4
101.9
91.7
102.7
101.3
91.7

99.9
106.4
97.5
102.0
91.1
105.4
101.3
92.3

101.1
111.9
97.9
103.1
91.5
105.3
101.2
93.2

93.6
99.4

93.7
99.3

93.2
99.1

94.2
99.1

94.1
99.0

94.1
99.2

93.7
99.1

94.4
99.2

94.9
98.6

95.4
98.5

95.7
98.5

96.4
98.5

97.3
98.7

93.3
97.6
76.6
98.3

93.0
97.7
77.3
98.3

92.6
97.6
76.1
97.5

92.6
97.7
79.2
98.0

93.0
97.6
80.0
97.9

93.6
97.6
78.5
97.5

93.2
97.5
75.8
97.6

93.5
97.9
78.1
98.3

93.2
97.9
78.0
98.2

94.9
97.8
79.1
98.4

94.5
97.7
80.7
98.3

94.7
97.9
82.1
98.7

94.2
98.0
85.2
99.2

96.2
98.7

96.1
99.2

96.0
99.4

95.9
100.3

95.8
100.7

95.8
100.6

95.7
100.6

95.8
101.4

95.7
102.6

95.6
102.5

95.5
102.1

95.3
102.5

95.4
103.3

98.6
84.6

98.6
84.2

98.6
83.9

99.4
83.3

99.8
82.7

100.0
82.8

100.0
82.1

100.8
81.8

100.8
80.6

100.4
80.6

100.1
80.5

100.4
78.7

100.6
78.4

91.1
95.9
100.5
99.4

92.0
95.6
100.5
99.6

91.7
95.4
100.4
99.5

90.4
95.7
100.6
99.6

90.0
95.3
100.6
99.8

89.5
95.5
100.6
99.6

89.4
95.2
100.7
99.7

89.3
95.4
100.7
100.0

88.7
96.1
100.7
99.9

88.8
96.0
100.7
99.8

88.7
95.8
100.5
99.8

87.8
95.9
101.3
99.8

87.9
96.0
101.4
99.9

98.3

98.5

98.8

99.2

99.4

99.6 I 99.3

100.0

100.1

99.6

99.3

Monthly Labor Review

99.2 I 99.7

January 2004

109

Current Labor Statistics:

40.

Price Data

U.S. export price indexes by end-use category

[ 2000 =

100]_____________
2 () 0 2

C ategory

Nov.
A L L C O M M O D IT IE S ...................

Foods, feeds, a n d beverages........
Agricultural foods, feeds, and beverages...
Nonagricultural (fish, beverages) food products.
Industrial supplies and materials...........
Agricultural Industrial supplies and materials
Fuels and lubricants..........
Nonagricultural supplies and materials,
excluding fuel and building materials........
Selected building materials.......

2003

Dec.

98.8

98.6

109.6
110.4
102.0

108.7
109.5
102.3

96.1

96.0

100.1

101.9

Jan.

Feb.

98.9
109.4
102.8
103.3

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

99.5

99.7

99.6

99.7

99.5

99.4

99.4

99.8

100.1

100.6

104.6

108.2
108.1
110.0

108.5
108.6
108.0

111.8
112.1
110.2

111.3
111.2
113.1

110.8
111.0
109.3

109.4
109.5
109.5

115.4
116.4
106.1

117.2
118.4
105.4

121.7
123.1
107.9

99.2

100.6

100.1

99.4

100.1

99.6

100.0

100.2

101.0

101.6

103.8

104.8

104.6

103.5

104.4

104.7

105.5

107.2

113.5

119.8

108.0

96.3

94.5

97.0

97.0

100.4

97.5

97.2

96.1

99.9
96.4

100.7
96.6

100.2
96.5

100.7
96.3

100.0
97.5

100.1
98.0

100.4
98.5

101.1
98.8

101.6
99.1

98.3
101.6
95.6

98.3
101.5
95.6

98.3
101.5
95.5

97.6
101.6
94.5

97.7
101.8
94.6

97.7
101.6
94.5

97.5
101.7
94.3

97.4
101.5
94.1

97.5
101.5
94.1

91.6
96.5
96.6

96.4
96.2

97.3

Capital goods...............
Electric and electrical generating equipment
Nonelectrical machinery.............

102.0
95.7

101.9
95.4

101.9

Automotive vehicles, parts, and engines..

101.4

101.3

101.5

101.5

101.6

101.5

101.6

Consumer goods, excluding automotive....
Nondurables, manufactured.....
Durables, manufactured..........

101.8

101.8

101.7

101.9

99.3
98.6
99.7

101.8

99.3
98.7
99.6

99.1
99.6

99.4
98.7
99.7

99.3
98.5
99.8

99.4
98.5
99.9

99.6
98.8
100.1

99.6
98.8
100.2

99.4
98.7
99.9

99.4
98.5
100.1

99.8
98.9
100.4

100.0
99.3
100.5

107.9
98.8

107.5
99.1

107.9
99.0

110.6
98.8

110.0
98.7

109.9
98.6

108.8
98.7

114.9
98.6

117.6
98.7

122.6
98.9

Agricultural commodities............
Nonagricultural commodities..............

41.

108.7
98.0

97.8

95.7

98.2

U.S. import price indexes by end-use category

[2000 =

100]___________
2 () 0 2

Category

Nov.

2003

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

94.6

95.2

99.9
105.8
87.1

100.2
106.0
87.5

Industrial supplies and materials......

92.3

94.6

109.7

Fuels and lubricants.............
Petroleum and petroleum products........
Paper and paper base stocks.............
Materials associated with nondurable
supplies and materials..............
Selected building materials.......
Unfinished metals associated with durable goods..
Nonmetals associated with durable goods
Capital goods...................
Electric and electrical generating equipment...
Nonelectrical machinery...............

89.8
89.0

94.7
94.0

125.2
118.6

89.7

89.1

91.0

99.7
96.4
90.5
96.9

100.1
95.0
91.5
97.1

lUl.D
y>_).u
90.5
96.9

93.3
97.4

94.8
92.9

94.9
92.8

95.3

Automotive vehicles, parts, and engines.

100.4

100.5

Consumer goods, excluding automotive..
Nondurables, manufactured....
Durables, manufactured.......
Nonmanufactured consumer goods.....

97.9
99.3
96.7
95.2

98.0
99.7
96.5
95.4

A L L C O M M O D IT IE S ........................

Foods, feeds, and beverages......
Agricultural foods, feeds, and beverages....
Nonagricultural (fish, beverages) food products

96.9

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

96.0

95.3

96.2

96.7

96.7

96.2

96.2

96.6

87.4

102.6
109.6
86.9

102.5
108.9
88.4

101.3
107.5
87.7

100.7
107.1
86.6

101.5
107.7
88.0

101.3
107.6
87.4

101.8
108.2
87.6

102.0
109.1
86.2

102.2
109.7
85.3

97.6

95.3

98.2

100.2

100.5

98.9

99.3

100.2

99.3
96.3

100.3
96.4

103.9
101.4

104.2
103.2

99.4
97.1

99.8
98.5

100.6
99.6

93.5

94.9
91.5
94.1

94.1

93.6

94.7

92.2

94.2

94.2

104.2
96.3
92.8
97.9

103.5
95.4
91.7
97.1

102.5
96.2
89.9
97.3

103.0
96.7
92.2
98.2

102.9
101.8
92.2
97.9

102.3
102.7
92.9
97.3

102.4
110.5
93.4
97.8

103.0
109.6
94.4
97.6

104.7
108.7
96.2
98.0

95.5

93.7
95.5
92.5

93.8
95.6
92.5

93.6
96.1
92.2

93.8
96.6
92.3

93.8
96.8
92.3

93.6
96.6
92.1

93.5
95.8
92.0

93.0
96.1
91.4

93.2
96.2
91.6

100.3

1UU.O

100.5

100.5

100.6

100.6

100.6

100.6

100.5

101.2

101.2

98.0

97.9

95.5

95.5

97.9
99.7
96.2
95.7

97.9
99.9
96.1
95.6

97.9
99.8
96.2
95.6

98.1
99.8
96.5
96.2

98.1
99.9
96.3
95.7

97.9
99.8
96.2
95.6

97.9
99.7
96.2
95.7

97.8
99.7
96.0
95.8

98.1
100.1
96.2
95.8

107.9
86.8

107.7

20 01

Sept.

Airfreight (inbound).............
Air freight (outbound)..............
Air passenger fares (U.S. carriers)......
Air passenger fares (foreign carriers)..........
Ocean liner freight (inbound).........

110

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2002

Dec.

Mar.

June

2003

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

94.9
97.6

95.2
97.9

93.9
95.9

98.3
98.4

100.3
97.3

105.9
95.4

108.8
97.2

109.5
95.4

112.6
95.4

107.6
110.2
98.1

103.5
100.8
93.6

103.3
99.4
91.7

110.7
110.9
90.3

114.3
118.5
93.5

107.9
107.2
93.3

112.0
111.7
94.0

119.3
123.2
116.2

119.7
124.9
116.2

January 2004

Nov.

99.1

42. U.S. international price Indexes for selected categories of services
[2000 = 100] __________
C ategory

Oct.

98.5

43.

Indexes of productivity, hourly compensation, and unit costs, quarterly data seasonally adjusted

[1992 = 100]

III

Business
Output per hour of all persons................
Compensation per hour........................
Real compensation per hour..................
Unit labor costs...................................
Unit nonlabor payments.......................
Implicit price deflator............................
Nonfarm business
Output per hour of all persons............... .
Compensation per hour........................
Real compensation per hour.................
Unit labor costs..................................
Unit nonlabor payments.......................
Implicit price deflator...........................
Nonfinancial corporations
Output per hour of all employees...........
Compensation per hour.......................
Real compensation per hour.................
Total unit costs..................................
Unit labor costs................................
Unit nonlabor costs...........................
Unit profits........................................
Unit nonlabor payments.......................
Implicit price deflator...........................
Manufacturing
Output per hour of all persons..............
Compensation per hour.......................
Real compensation per hour................
Unit labor costs.................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

IV

I

II

2003

2002

2001

2000

Item

III

IV

I

II

III

IV

I

III

II

116.8
134.6
111.4
115.3
111.0
113.7

117.5
135.9
111.7
115.6
111.9
114.3

117.4
137.4
111.9
117.1
112.0
115.2

117.8
138.2
111.6
117.3
113.3
115.8

118.8
139.1
112.1
117.1
115.1
116.4

121.3
139.8
112.8
115.2
117.0
115.9

123.9
141.0
113.4
113.8
119.7
116.0

124.1
142.4
113.5
114.7
118.8
116.2

125.9
143.1
113.5
113.6
120.9
116.3

126.4
143.7
113.4
113.7
122.1
116.8

127.2
145.4
113.7
114.2
122.3
117.2

129.5
146.9
114.7
113.5
124.3
117.5

131.9
147.2
114.2
111.6
129.0
118.0

116.4
134.2
111.0
115.3
112.6
114.3

117.0
135.3
111.2
115.6
113.3
114.8

116.9
136.7
111.3
117.0
113.5
115.7

117.4
137.4
111.0
117.1
114.9
116.3

118.3
138.2
111.4
116.8
116.8
116.8

120.7
138.9
112.1
115.1
119.0
116.5

123.4
140.2
112.8
113.6
121.5
116.4

123.7
141.5
112.9
114.4
121.2
116.8

125.5
142.2
112.8
113.3
123.1
116.9

126.0
142.8
112.7
113.3
124.3
117.3

126.7
144.2
112.4
113.4
125.2
117.7

128.9
145.0
113.2
112.5
127.5
117.9

131.4
146.1
113.4
111.2
131.0
118.4

119.4
130.3
107.8
108.6
109.1
107.1
109.5
107.7
108.6

119.4
131.6
108.1
109.8
110.2
108.9
98.6
106.3
108.9

118.7
131.2
106.8
110.8
110.6
111.6
93.1
106.9
109.3

120.0
132.6
107.1
111.3
110.4
113.5
95.4
108.9
109.9

121.3
133.8
107.8
111.7
110.3
115.5
97.9
111.0
110.5

124.5
134.7
108.7
109.8
108.2
114.1
107.6
112.4
109.6

126.0
135.9
109.4
109.5
107.9
114.0
107.6
112.4
109.4

127.7
137.3
109.5
109.4
107.5
114.5
107.8
112.8
109.3

128.7
138.2
109.7
109.6
107.4
115.4
104.6
112.6
109.1

129.9
139.2
109.9
109.3
107.1
115.2
110.1
113.9
109.4

131.0
140.5
109.9
109.3
107.2
114.9
112.4
114.3
109.6

133.7
141.8
110.7
107.8
106.1
112.6
126.8
116.2
109.4

136.7
142.8
110.9
106.5
104.5
111.9
142.8
119.7
109.6

135.4
132.2
109.4
| 97.7

135.9
131.5
108.0
96.8

135.2
132.0
107.5
97.6

135.8
133.6
107.9
98.4

137.8
135.0
108.8
97.9

139.9
136.7
110.3
97.7

142.9
138.3
111.3
96.8

144.8
140.5
112.0
97.0

147.2
141.3
112.1
96.0

147.0
142.4
112.4
96.9

148.5
144.3
112.9
97.2

149.6
146.1
114.1
97.6

152.7
147.6
114.6
96.7

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

111

Current Labor Statistics:

44.

Productivity Data

Annual indexes of multifactor productivity and related measures, selected years

[1996 = 100, unless otherwise indicated!
Item

1980

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Private business

Productivity:
Output per hour of all persons.........
Output per unit of capital services.....
Multifactor productivity......
Output.......................
Inputs:
Labor input.................
Capital services...............
Combined units of labor and capital input.
Capital per hour of all persons.......

75.8
103.3
88.8

90.2
99.7

94.8

95.4
98.7
97.1
88.5

96.6
100.4
98.2
92.8

97.3
99.8
98.4
95.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

102.0
100.3
101.2
105.2

105.9
99.3
102.5
110.5

107.7
98.2
103.4
115.7

111.0
96.6
105.0
120.4

112.4
92.8
103.9
120.2

91.8
89.7
91.1
96.6

95.6
92.5
94.6
96.2

98.0
96.0
97.3
97.5

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.5
104.9
104.0
101.9

106.1
111.3
107.1
105.8

109.0
117.9
111.9
109.7

110.1
124.5
114.7
114.8

109.5
129.6
115.7
121.1

95.3
99.0
97.2
88.4

96.5
100.4
98.2
92.6

97.5
100.0
98.6
95.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

102.0
100.0
101.0
105.1

104.7
99.0
102.2
110.5

107.1
97.6
102.9
115.7

110.3
95.9
120.2

111.6
92.0
103.3
120.1

96.5

91.8
89.4
91.0
96.3

95.4
92.2
94.5
96.1

97.8
95.8
97.2
97.6

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.6
105.1
104.1
101.9

106.4
111.7
108.1
105.8

109.5
118.5
112.4
109.7

110.6
125.4
115.2
115.0

110.1
130.5
116.3
121.3

65.5

90.3
97.0
94.8
88.3

93.0
99.7
97.4
93.0

96.6
100.6
99.2
96.9

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

104.2
101.8
103.3
106.0

109.3
101.9
105.4
111.0

114.9
102.3
108.1
115.7

119.5
101.1
110.1
118.6

97.8
91.1
96.7
87.1
94.1
93.1

99.9
93.2
99.9
90.0
96.2
95.5

100.4
96.4
102.1
93.0
100.5
97.7

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.8
104.1
98.5
102.0
104.5
102.6

101.5
108.9
105.0
110.0
103.1
105.3

100.7
113.1
101.8
114.9
104.4
107.01

99.3
117.3
104.6
115.9
105.5
107.7

96.7
85.7

67.0
73.4

87.5
90.4

77.3
107.6
91.0

100.4

89.3
87.5
87.4

Private nonfarm business

Productivity:
Output per hour of all persons..........
Output per unit of capital services.........
Multifactor productivity............
Output.......................
Inputs:
Labor input.................
Capital services..............
Combined units of labor and capital input...
Capital per hour of all persons......

85.5

O O .b

65.9
71.8

87.2
89.9

62.1
97.4
81.2

82.3
97.5

87.0
87.0

Manufacturing (1996 = 100)

Productivity:
Output per hour of all persons...........
Output per unit of capital services........
Multifactor productivity....
Output......................
Inputs:
Hours of all persons...........
Capital services...............
Energy....................
Nonenergy materials.............
Purchased business services...
Combined units of all factor inputs........

112

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

103.7
63.6
67.3
79.3

January 2004

96.5
89.1
84.8
89.4

88.4

91.7
91.2

104.4

_
-

_
_
-

”

45.

Annual indexes of productivity, hourly compensation, unit costs, and prices, selected years

n 992- 1001
Item

1960

1970

1980

1990

1994

1995

B u sin ess

1996

1998

1999

2000

2002

2001

49.5
13.9
60.7
28.0
25.1
27.0

67.1
23.5
78.6
35.1
31.7
33.9

80.3
54.1
88.9
67.3
61.7
65.2

95.3
90.7
96.3
95.2
94.0
94.8

101.7
104.4
99.7
102.6
106.4
104.0

102.3
106.5
99.4
104.1
109.4
106.0

105.1
109.9
99.8
104.6
113.2
107.7

107.4
113.2
100.7
105.4
117.0
109.7

110.2
119.4
104.8
108.4
114.3
110.6

113.0
124.8
107.2
110.4
113.7
111.6

116.5
133.5
111.0
114.6
111.8
113.5

118.8
138.6
112.1
116.7
114.3
115.8

125.1
142.5
113.5
113.9
120.4
116.3

52.4
14.5
63.2
27.6
24.5
26.5

68.8
23.7
79.0
34.4
31.3
33.3

81.7
54.3
89.3
66.4
60.6
64.3

95.3
90.5
96.1
93.7
93.6
94.5

101.8
104.3
99.6
106.9
106.9
104.1

102.7
106.5
99.4
110.4
110.4
106.1

105.3
109.8
99.7
113.4
113.5
107.6

107.4
113.0
100.5
117.9
118.0
109.8

110.2
119.1
104.5
115.5
115.7
110.8

112.8
124.3
106.8
115.3
115.5
112.1

116.1
133.0
110.6
113.3
113.5
114.1

118.3
137.8
111.4
116.1
116.4
116.3

124.7
141.7
112.8
122.5
122.5
116.9

55.4
15.6
68.1
26.8
23.3
50.2
30.2
28.8

70.4
25.3
84.4
34.8
35.9
31.9
44.4
35.1
35.6

81.1
56.5
92.9
68.4
69.6
65.1
68.8
66.0
68.4

95.5
90.9
96.5
95.9
95.2
98.0
94.3
97.1
95.8

103.1
104.2
99.5
101.1
101.0
101.3
131.7
109.0
103.7

104.1
106.1
99.0
102.0
101.9
102.2
139.0
111.6
105.1

107.5
108.9
98.9
101.2
101.4
100.6
152.2
113.8
105.5

108.4
110.3
98.1
101.5
101.8
100.9
156.9
115.2
106.2

111.7
115.9
101.6
103.3
103.8
102.2
141.7
112.3
106.6

114.7
121.0
104.0
104.9
105.5
103.4
131.5
110.6
107.2

118.7
129.1
107.3
108.2
108.8
106.7
111.6
108.0
108.5

121.1
133.0
107.6
110.9
109.9
113.7
98.5
109.8
109.8

128.1
137.7
109.6
109.4
107.5
114.8
107.5
112.9
109.3

41.8
14.9
65.0
35.6
26.8
30.2

54.2
23.7
79.2
43.8
29.3
35.0

70.1
55.6
91.4
79.3
80.2
79.9

92.9
90.8
96.4
97.8
99.8
99.0

105.0
105.6
101.0
100.7
102.8
102.0

109.0
107.9
100.6
99.0
106.9
103.9

112.8
109.4
99.4
96.9
109.9
104.8

117.6
111.5
99.1
94.8
110.0
104.1

123.3
117.4
103.0
95.2
103.7
100.4

129.7
122.1
104.9
94.1
104.9
100.7

134.9
131.1
109.0
97.2
107.0
103.2

137.1
134.3
108.6
97.9

145.5
140.6
112.0
96.7

N o n fa rm b u s in e s s

N o n fin a n c ia l c o rp o ra tio n s

M an u fa c tu rin g

Implicit price deflator...........................................

1997

“

Dash indicates data not available.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

113

Current Labor Statistics:

46.

Productivity Data

Annual indexes ot output per hour tor selected

naics

industries, 1990-2001

1997=100]
N AICS

Industry

21
211
212
2121
2122
2123

Mining........................................................
Oil and gas extraction....................................
Mining, except oil and gas..............................
Coal mining.................................................
Metal ore mining...........................................
Nonmetallic mineral mining and quarrying..........

2211
2212

Power generation and supply..........................
Natural gas distribution..................................

3111
3112
3113
3114
3115

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Mining

86.1
78.4
79.3
68.1
79.9
92.3

86.9
78.8
80.0
69.3
82.7
89.5

95.4
81.9
86.8
75.3
91.7
96.1

96.3
85.1
89.9
79.9
102.2
93.6

99.6
90.3
93.0
83.9
104.1
96.9

101.8
95.5
94.0
88.2
98.5
97.3

101.8
98.9
96.0
94.9
95.3
97.1

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.5
101.6
104.6
106.5
109.5
101.2

111.1
107.9
105.9
110.3
112.7
101.2

109.2
114.5
106.8
115.8
124.4
96.2

107.4
116.6
109.0
114.4
131.8
99.4

71.2
71.4

73.8
72.7

74.1
75.8

78.7
79.8

83.0
82.2

88.6
89.0

95.5
96.1

100.0
100.0

103.8
99.1

104.1
103.1

107.0
113.4

106.4
110.2

Animal food.................................................
Grain and oilseed milling................................
Sugar and confectionery products....................
Fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty......
Dairy products..............................................

90.1
89.0
91.0
86.4
90.9

89.3
91.3
93.8
89.7
92.1

90.2
91.2
90.6
90.7
95.5

90.2
94.0
92.6
93.9
94.0

87.3
94.8
93.9
95.0
95.5

94.0
99.1
94.2
97.2
99.0

87.5
91.4
98.3
98.2
98.2

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

109.4
107.6
104.0
106.8
99.2

109.5
114.1
107.2
108.5
94.5

109.7
112.5
112.1
109.9
96.1

127.2
117.4
109.8
117.2
96.3

3116
3117
3118
3119
3121

Animal slaughtering and processing.................
Seafood product preparation and packaging....
Bakeries and tortilla manufacturing...................
Other food products.......................................
Beverages...................................................

94.6
117.5
92.6
92.0
86.5

97.0
112.0
92.2
93.6
90.0

101.6
115.3
95.4
96.0
93.7

101.0
113.9
96.0
102.9
93.1

97.6
114.1
96.7
100.3
97.7

98.7
108.4
99.7
101.2
99.6

94.4
116.2
97.8
103.1
101.2

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

99.9
117.0
103.6
107.0
98.6

100.4
130.2
105.5
108.8
92.4

101.9
137.6
105.2
110.3
90.7

102.8
147.3
106.2
103.4
91.8

3122
3131
3132
3133
3141

Tobacco and tobacco products........................
Fiber, yarn, and thread mills............................
Fabric mills..................................................
Textile and fabric finishing mills.......................
Textile furnishings mills..................................

81.4
73.9
75.0
81.7
88.1

77.3
74.7
77.7
80.4
88.6

79.6
80.1
81.5
83.7
92.8

73.7
84.6
85.0
86.0
93.7

89.8
87.2
91.9
87.8
90.0

97.5
92.0
95.8
84.5
92.5

99.4
98.7
98.0
85.0
93.2

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

98.1
102.2
103.9
100.6
99.9

92.1
104.6
109.8
101.7
101.2

98.0
102.6
110.2
104.0
106.6

100.0
110.5
109.1
109.7
106.9

3149
3151
3152
3159
3161

Other textile product mills...............................
Apparel knitting mills.....................................
Cut and sew apparel.....................................
Accessories and other apparel........................
Leather and hide tanning and finishing..............

91.1
85.6
70.1
100.9
60.8

89.9
88.7
72.0
97.3
56.6

92.0
93.5
73.2
98.7
76.7

90.2
102.6
76.6
99.0
83.1

94.7
104.5
80.4
104.6
75.9

95.8
109.5
85.5
112.4
78.6

96.3
122.0
90.7
112.6
91.5

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

97.0
96.6
104.0
110.8
98.0

110.5
102.0
118.8
103.3
101.6

110.5
110.4
127.8
104.9
110.0

105.0
108.2
131.8
114.8
109.7

3162
3169
3211
3212
3219

Footwear.....................................................
Other leather products...................................
Sawmills and wood preservation......................
Plywood and engineered wood products...........
Other wood products.....................................

77.1
102.5
79.2
102.3
105.4

74.7
100.2
81.6
107.4
104.7

83.1
97.0
86.1
114.7
104.2

81.7
94.3
82.6
109.1
103.0

90.4
80.0
85.1
105.8
99.2

95.6
73.2
91.0
101.8
100.3

103.4
79.7
96.2
101.2
100.7

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

100.9
109.2
100.8
105.6
101.6

116.8
100.4
105.4
99.9
105.3

124.1
107.6
106.5
100.6
104.0

142.7
114.1
109.0
104.8
104.7

3221
3222
3231
3241
3251

Pulp, paper, and paperboard mills....................
Converted paper products..............................
Printing and related support activities...............
Petroleumand coal products...........................
Basic chemicals............................................

88.5
90.4
96.7
76.7
91.5

88.1
93.5
95.4
75.8
90.2

92.2
93.5
101.4
79.1
89.5

92.6
96.3
100.2
84.6
90.0

97.4
97.5
98.4
85.7
95.2

101.9
97.0
98.8
90.2
92.4

97.4
98.2
99.6
94.8
90.1

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.0
102.5
100.5
102.2
102.7

111.3
101.5
103.5
108.0
114.8

115.6
101.8
105.0
113.2
118.4

117.2
100.9
105.7
112.2
111.0

3252
3253
3254
3255
3256

Resin, rubber, and artificial fibers.....................
Agricultural chemicals....................................
Pharmaceuticals and medicines.......................
Paints, coatings, and adhesives.......................
Soap, cleaning compounds, and toiletries.........

75.7
84.6
91.4
85.1
83.2

74.8
81.0
92.7
85.9
84.2

80.7
81.3
88.1
87.6
83.4

83.8
85.6
88.1
90.9
87.0

93.4
87.4
92.4
94.1
88.6

95.9
90.7
96.3
92.7
93.9

93.3
92.1
99.9
98.3
95.7

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

105.4
98.8
92.9
99.1
96.6

108.9
87.6
94.6
98.8
91.2

108.1
91.4
93.4
98.5
99.3

103.8
91.1
97.3
102.1
102.6

3259
3261
3262
3271
3272

Other chemical products and preparations........
Plastics products..........................................
Rubber products...........................................
Clay products and refractories.........................
Glass and glass products...............................

76.6
84.7
83.0
89.2
80.0

78.0
86.3
83.9
87.4
79.3

84.7
90.4
84.8
91.5
84.5

90.6
91.7
90.3
91.8
86.1

92.6
94.4
90.2
96.6
87.6

94.4
94.4
92.9
97.3
88.7

94.2
97.0
94.3
102.7
96.7

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

99.4
103.4
100.5
101.1
102.6

109.2
109.3
101.4
103.4
108.6

120.0
111.3
103.8
103.5
109.8

111.3
113.1
104.1
97.6
105.2

3273
3274
3279
3311
3312

Cement and concrete products........................
Lime and gypsum products.............................
Other nonmetallic mineral products..................
Iron and steel mills and ferroalloy production....
Steel products frompurchased stee..................

95.0
84.1
79.8
69.6
83.7

93.7
82.7
81.4
67.2
86.2

94.9
88.5
90.2
74.1
89.6

96.5
90.1
89.3
81.7
95.8

95.0
87.8
90.5
87.2
100.0

98.2
88.8
91.7
89.7
100.2

100.6
92.4
96.5
94.1
100.2

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.4
113.1
98.8
101.7
100.2

104.3
102.7
95.5
106.5
94.0

100.4
97.0
95.6
108.5
96.1

97.1
100.1
96.8
106.7
97.0

3313
3314
3315
3321
3322

Alumina and aluminumproduction....................
Other nonferrous metal production...................
Foundries....................................................
Forging and stamping....................................
Cutlery and hand tools...................................

91.9
95.7
85.1
88.6
85.1

93.3
95.8
84.4
86.5
85.4

96.8
98.7
85.7
91.7
87.2

96.0
101.8
89.7
94.6
91.7

100.3
105.1
91.4
93.7
94.4

96.8
103.0
93.1
94.2
97.8

95.9
105.6
96.2
97.6
104.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.1
111.1
101.5
103.7
100.0

104.3
108.8
104.7
110.9
107.8

97.8
103.1
103.8
121.3
105.8

96.9
100.5
109.4
121.8
110.2

3323
3324
3325
3326
3327

Architectural and structural metals...................
Boilers, tanks, and shipping containers.............
Hardware....................................................
Spring and wire products................................
Machine shops and threaded products..............
See note at end of table.

87.8
90.4
84.4
85.2
78.8

89.2
92.6
83.8
88.4
79.6

92.6
95.3
86.9
90.9
87.2

93.4
94.8
89.6
95.3
86.9

95.1
100.5
95.7
91.5
91.5

93.8
97.8
97.3
99.5
98.8

94.2
100.7
102.6
102.8
100.0

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.0
101.3
101.0
111.6
99.3

101.8
98.9
106.5
112.9
103.8

101.0
97.7
115.8
114.6
107.3

100.7
98.2
114.6
110.6
107.4

Utilities

M anufacturing

114

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

46. Continued— Annual indexes of output per hour for selected

[1997 = 100]

n aics

industries, 1990-2001

_______
Industry

N AICS

990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1999

1998

2000

2001

77.9
85.9
77.3
81.1
89.8

86.7
90.5
79.6
79.5
96.6

91.7
92.0
84.1
84.9
101.9

96.4
94.9
91.0
90.0
101.2

102.6
97.0
95.7
97.9
103.2

102.8
98.7
96.0
98.8
106.5

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.5
102.2
104.3
94.4
107.8

101.3
100.2
95.1
105.2
111.3

105.8
100.7
101.2
129.7
101.6

104.7
98.0
99.5
104.6
94.4
110.8
102.0

3328
3329
3331
3332
3333

Coating, engraving, and heat treating metals
Other fabricated metal products
Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery
Industrial machinery
Commercial and service industry machinery

81.6
86.6
82.9
80.6
91.6

3334
3335
3336
3339
3341

HVACand commercial refrigeration equipment
Metalworking machinery
Turbine and power transmission equipment
Other general purpose machinery
Computer and peripheral equipment

88.8
85.3
85.0
86.0
14.3

88.2
82.2
84.4
85.2
15.8

90.8
89.3
81.2
85.2
20.6

93.8
89.2
84.7
89.9
27.9

97.3
93.9
93.2
91.5
35.9

96.6
98.9
92.0
94.5
51.2

97.8
98.1
97.8
95.0
72.6

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

106.6
99.0
106.4
103.1
138.7

110.4
100.4
113.2
105.6
190.3

108.3
106.4
116.9
113.0
225.2

130.1
109.4
237.0

3342
3343
3344
3345
3346

Communications equipment
Audio and video equipment
Semiconductors and electronic components
Electronic instruments
Magnetic media manufacturing and reproduction

47.3
75.5
21.4
76.0
86.6

49.3
82.8
24.5
80.4
91.2

59.3
92.1
29.6
83.0
93.0

62.1
98.8
34.1
85.8
96.8

70.1
108.5
43.1
88.8
106.1

74.6
140.0
63.4
96.7
106.7

84.3
104.7
81.8
97.6
103.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

102.7
103.1
125.3
101.3
105.4

134.0
116.2
174.5
105.0
106.8

165.5
123.3
233.3
114.2
104.0

155.2
126.3
231.6
116.0
98.6

3351
3352
3353
3359
3361

Electric lighting equipment
Household appliances
Electrical equipment
Other electrical equipment and components
Motor vehicles

87.2
76.5
73.5
75.3
86.0

88.4
76.6
72.7
74.3
82.4

93.7
82.4
78.7
81.7
91.2

90.7
89.0
85.7
86.9
89.8

94.5
95.1
88.9
89.5
90.2

92.1
92.8
98.0
92.1
88.6

95.4
93.3
100.1
95.9
91.0

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.7
105.2
99.6
105.6
113.2

102.4
104.4
98.8
115.1
123.2

101.8
117.6
100.6
120.6
110.4

105.4

3362
3363
3364
3365
3366

Motor vehicle bodies and trailers
Motor vehicle parts
Aerospace products and parts
Railroad rolling stock
Ship and boat building

75.9
75.7
87.7
77.2
99.7

71.7
74.7
92.0
80.0
92.7

88.2
82.6
94.0
81.1
98.6

96.3
88.6
98.1
82.3
101.4

97.8
91.8
93.7
83.1
99.0

97.2
92.4
93.7
82.0
93.2

98.5
93.1
98.0
80.9
94.1

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

102.5
104.8
118.5
102.9
100.3

103.2
110.5
118.1
116.0
112.3

98.6
112.6
101.0
117.7
120.1

99.4
114.7
114.8
124.7
119.9

3369
3371
3372
3379
3391
3399

Other transportation equipment
Household and institutional furniture
Office furniture and fixtures
Other furniture-related products
Medical equipment and supplies
Other miscellaneous manufacturing

62.6
87.7
80.9
88.1
81.2
90.2

62.1
88.1
78.8
88.6
83.1
90.7

88.3
92.8
86.3
88.4
88.1
90.0

99.7
93.7
88.0
90.5
91.1
92.3

93.3
93.9
83.4
93.6
90.8
93.1

92.8
97.0
84.5
94.5
95.0
96.0

99.8
99.4
85.6
96.7
100.0
99.6

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

110.6
102.5
100.3
107.2
108.9
102.1

113.1
103.5
98.5
102.5
109.6
105.3

131.0
102.6
100.2
100.1
114.2
113.1

146.9
106.1
97.1
105.3
119.0
110.9

42
423
4231
4232
4233

Wholesale trade
Durable goods
Motor vehicles and parts
Furniture and furnishings
Lumber and construction supplies

78.3
65.6
76.6
82.4
115.0

79.5
66.1
73.3
87.2
113.2

86.5
75.0
82.2
92.0
119.6

89.6
80.4
88.0
95.9
113.9

91.4
84.2
94.1
93.3
112.0

93.1
88.5
93.6
96.8
103.6

95.9
93.5
94.9
97.0
102.9

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

104.8
106.3
104.7
97.5
102.9

111.6
116.6
119.8
100.8
104.9

114.7
121.2
114.0
105.5
101.7

116.6
119.7
114.1
105.4
108.6

4234
4235
4236
4237
4238

Commercial equipment
Metals and minerals
Electric goods
Hardware and plumbing
Machinery and supplies

32.7
108.1
47.4
96.3
76.2

36.1
109.1
48.2
93.3
72.0

46.6
116.0
51.9
102.6
77.8

54.3
117.4
59.6
99.8
82.6

58.4
114.3
68.6
105.8
84.1

72.1
103.8
79.6
101.0
88.8

85.3
104.0
88.0
100.6
93.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

122.4
102.4
105.9
103.5
104.2

150.2
96.0
126.2
107.8
101.4

160.6
99.1
151.7
111.1
104.1

158.9
101.9
148.1

4239
424
4241
4242
4243

Miscellaneous durable goods
Nondurable goods
Paper and paper products
Druggists' goods
Apparel and piece goods

91.8
98.2
81.3
84.7
104.9

98.7
99.6
85.7
89.2
104.2

114.1
103.0
96.8
93.9
100.7

114.9
102.8
97.5
90.9
98.2

107.3
101.6
101.7
94.2
104.2

100.0
99.6
99.1
96.4
92.5

101.4
99.2
96.6
98.8
99.1

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.8
102.8
100.5
99.6
104.1

112.6
104.1
105.6
101.7
103.5

116.7
103.5
105.5
96.8
102.6

116.1
106.9
109.0

4244
4245
4246
4247
4248

Grocery and related products
Farmproduct rawmaterials
Chemicals
Petroleum
Alcoholic beverages

96.6
75.9
107.3
97.4
109.4

98.4
80.9
106.7
107.1
111.2

103.8
80.9
112.6
118.3
107.4

105.2
80.0
110.1
119.2
105.5

103.3
77.5
110.6
115.9
105.9

103.0
85.7
102.2
108.7
102.4

99.9
89.6
100.1
105.9
104.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.9
100.4
99.3
115.0
109.6

103.6
114.3
98.0
112.0
110.0

105.2
119.0
95.8
108.9
111.0

109.4

4249
42511
42512

Miscellaneous nondurable goods
Business to business electronic markets
Wholesale trade agents and brokers

107.2
69.2
71.2

98.1
70.7
74.5

93.8
78.5
83.5

97.5
83.1
87.3

94.8
86.8
89.2

96.1
89.1
92.9

98.7
94.3
97.8

100.0
100.0
100.0

101.7
104.3
104.9

99.6
123.4
110.5

106.2
143.3
116.5

104.2
168.9
114.2

44-45
441
4411
4412
4413

Retail trade
Motor vehicle and parts dealers.
Automobile dealers
Other motor vehicle dealers
Auto parts, accessories, and tire stores

83.8
90.1
91.9
72.7
87.3

84.0
88.8
90.7
75.6
86.3

87.5
92.9
94.6
82.6
91.4

90.2
94.2
95.8
87.7
92.4

93.5
97.1
97.9
92.9
97.0

95.0
97.2
97.1
93.0
99.0

98.0
98.9
98.9
98.6
98.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

104.3
102.6
102.6
106.0
105.7

110.0
106.4
106.4
113.0
110.0

114.4
107.4
106.9
108.6
112.0

117.4
109.1
108.0
112.4
109.3

81.3
82.1
79.9
45.1
82.3

81.7
83.5
79.0
48.4
80.7

88.8
88.9
88.4
56.1
84.6

88.9
89.0
88.5
64.7
88.5

90.8
88.9
93.2
77.0
94.2

94.4
92.5
96.6
88.8
94.1

99.5
97.8
101.7
94.7
97.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.7
102.1
101.3
123.8
106.7

109.5
108.2
111.2
153.6
112.2

115.5
114.8
116.6
180.1
113.1

116.5
119.2
113.5
202.7
115.7

W holesale trade

Retail trade

Furniture and home furnishings; stores
442
Furniture stores
4421
4422 Home furnishings stores
Electronics and appliance stores
443
Building material and garden supply stores
444
See note at end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

122.6

100.9
113.7
108.9

102.6

102.7

101.2

102.4
120.1

93.7
108.4
111.5

115

Current Labor Statistics:

Productivity Data

46. Continued— Annual indexes of output per hour for selected

n aics

industries, 1990-2001

1997=100]
NAICS

Industry

4441
4442
445
4451
4452

1990

1991

Building material and supplies dealers.....
Lawn and garden equipment and supplies stores
Food and beverage stores.........
Grocery stores.....................
Specialty food stores................

83 6
75.6
in« «
1f)7 Q
141.4

81.1
78.6
108.3
108.0
132.3

4453

Beer, wine and liquor stores............

mn 1

100.2

446
447
448

Health and personal care stores............
Gasoline stations...................
Clothing and clothing accessories stores.....

92.9
88.5
70.2

92.3

91.3

71.1

75.9

4481

Clothing stores.................

69.8

4482
4483
451
4511
4512

Shoe stores.......................
Jewelry, luggage, and leather goods stores......
Sporting goods, hobby, book, and music stores
Sporting goods and musical instrument stores
Book, periodical, and music stores..........

73.7
68.6
81.2
79.6
84.4

452
4521
4529
453
4531

General merchandise stores...............
Department stores................
Other general merchandise stores............
Miscellaneous store retailers.........
Florists...........................

75.3
84.1
61.5
68.0
75.2

4532
4533
4539
454
4541

Office supplies, stationery and gift stores......
Used merchandise stores............
Other miscellaneous store retailers....
Nonstore retailers................
Electronic shopping and mail-order houses......

4542
4543

Vending machine operators.............
Direct selling establishments...................

481
482111
48412
491

85.2
81.5

1993

89.6
82.6

Air transportation.........................
Line-haul railroads....................
General freight trucking, long-distance...........
U.S. Postal service....................

1995

1996

95.1
87.7
103.1
103.5
107.3

97.8
97.6
100.7
101.0
98.3

92.9

96.2

103.1

100.0

92.3
99.1

93.1
101.5
91.6

95.7
100.3
98.1

100.0
100.0
100.0

82.5

90.7

97.4

100.0

85.0
88.4
86.8
91.4

93.7
94.1
92.7
92.3
93.5

102.4
97.3
95.4
93.9
98.2

92.1
94.5
87.5
89.5
83.5

95.3
87.7
105.3

65.0
84.1
82.4
87.4

79.0

83.0

64.8
65.4

69.6

62.0
80.8
75.7
55.3
43.5

63.5
79.0
65.9
56.2
46.7

71.8

77.9

74.5

81.4

50.6

58.3

97.6
83.2

95.8
80.0

95.1
87.4

77.5
69.8
88.5
96.1

78.2
75.3
92.5
95.8

97.2
41.3
113.5
100.9
102.1

95.8
44.2
113.0
101.1
97.6

108.2
103.2
99.3

5171
5172

Wired telecommunications carriers...........
Wireless telecommunications carriers.........

65.5
76.0

70.8
73.5

76.8
85.6

80.7

83.2

89.8
72.2

97.8
73.1

79.8

74.5

102.8
103.4
99.7
104.0
107.2
125.7

100.2
102.2
98.2
103.1
106.8
121.2

121.4

92.8
81.6
96.1
95.5
117.3

86.5
79.8
94.3
93.2
115.6

90.0
85.6
104.7
94.9
116.2

2000

2001

105.8

99.8

111.1

110.4

103.9
105.6
105.4

106.9
110.6
112.9

111.5
106.5
120.3

112.4
110.0
123.7

106.7

113.4

120.9

125.3

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

97.8
107 7
108 P
112.2
101.2

104.9
11Qp
119.6
104.1

109.6
128.6
120.8
129.2
105.7

115.8
124.1
124.4
131.4
110.8

96.9
98.3
94.5
95.6
96.1

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

105.1
100.8
113.5
106.8
101.2

113.0
104.3
129.6
107.7
117.3

120.1
106.5
146.2
109.2
115.6

124.3
104.1
162.6
107.7
121.1

62.9

90.9
89.9
90.6
80.1
71.9

93.4
96.9
97.8
91.5
84.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

111.1
111.3
103.6
113.4
118.2

114.6
105.9
100.3
126.6
141.5

122.0
112.6
97.2
155.0
159.8

136.1
103.6
84.4
161.8
177.5

99.9

89.3
98.4

96.9
105.4

100.0
100.0

114.1
96.7

119.8
92.2

131.2
110.0

115.0
105.5

«
88.6
98.1
98.5

95.3
92.0
95.4
98.3

98.8
98.4
95.7
96.7

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

97.6
102.1
99.1
101.4

98.2
107.5
102.1
102.4

98.2
115.4
105.2
104.9

91.9
123.1
103.3
106.1

92.8

92.8
93.7
100.8
103.1
96.2

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

105.1
115.7
99.8
100.6
100.1

109.4
115.5
102.0
101.8
99.4

110.3
111.1
106.5
103.4
95.9

107.6
109.4
104.6
98.2
91.7

87.8
89.2
86.9

97.5

95.6

95.3

94.9
ÜO.U
107.8

105.8

96.8

95.4

93.3
83.2
101.5
106.3
98.1

81.7
94.8

97.1

90.6
98.3

97.5
103.0

100.0
100.0

106.9
114.2

114.6
133.9

122.3
138.2

124.3
171.6

92.7

95.9

99.1

100.0

98.4

101.5

105.1

102.3

83.0

101.1
91.2

108.9
97.1

100.0
100.0

102.1
104.7

114.4
108.8

113.3
104.8

113.4
102.9

88.6

96.5

100.0

94.3

111.2

116.7

118.1

107.2
100.9
96.9
105.0
99.3
104.5

105.4
99.4
96.5
102.5
97.6
102.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

100.3
101.3
100.1
102.7
102.1
100.0

102.2
101.7
99.4
103.5
106.0
99.4

107.1
104.4
101.1
107.0
111.7
100.3

103.2
104.9
101.1
109.2
108.4
98.1

Real estate and rental
and leasing

Passenger car rental.....................
Truck, trailer and RVrental and leasing.......

107.6
101.3
99.9
100.3
94.7

1999

115.2
119.7
107.7
107.5
110.8

Finance and insurance

Commercial banking..................

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

1998

113.8
108.5
105.1
104.9
105.3

79.4

77.1
84.7
83.0

1997

113.5
103.7
103.6
104.3
99.4

114.1

Intorm ation

Newspaper, book, and directory publishers......
Software publishers...................
Motion picture and video exhibition..........
Radio and television broadcasting......
Cable and other subscription programming.....

532111
53212

1994

Transportation and w arehousing

5111
5112
51213
5151
5152

52211

64.5
86.1
85.6
86.8

1992

104.4
70.9

76.2

Professional, scientific, and technical
services

Advertising agencies.......................
54181
7211
722
7221
7222
7223
7224

A ccom odation and food services

Traveler accommodations................
Food services and drinking places........
Full-service restaurants...................
Limited-service eating places............
Special food services...................
Drinking places, alcoholic beverages......

108.7
101.6
97.4
102.6

102.4

102.6

O ther services
(except public adm inistration)

8111
81211
81221
8123
81292

Automotive repair and maintenance..........
Hair, nail and skin care services............
Funeral homes and funeral services.........
Drycleaning and laundry services.............
Photofinishing.....................

91.2
84.3
100.4
93.8
123.6

102.9
98.9 100.0 105.3 106.6 108.1 109.3
92.4
97.1 100.0 102.7 103.7 102.9 107.9
103.6 100.4
97.9 100.0 103.8 100.5
94.4
93.7
95.7
98.9 101.5 100.0 105.0 109.5 114.1 120.7
124.9 114.7 103.2 100.0
99.4 106.8 107.4 113.6
Note: Data reflect the conversion to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), replacing the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. NAics-based data bv
industry are not comoarahle to thp sir-hacpH hoto
7
uaia uy

116

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

47.

Unemployment rates, approximating U.S. concepts, in nine countries, quarterly d ata
seasonally adjusted

United States......
Canada.............
Jacan1..............
France1.............
Germany1..........
Italy2.................
Sweden1............
United Kinndom1...

2001

4.8
6.4
6.7
5.1
8.5
8.0
9.6
5.0
5.1

2002

5.8
7.0
6.3
5.4
8.8
8.4
9.1
5.2
5.2

2002

2001

A nnual average
C ountry

4.2
6.2
6.5
4.8
8.5
7.9
10.0
5.1
5.1

4.5
6.3
6.8
4,9
8.4
8.0
9.7
5.0
5.0

' Preliminary for 2002 for Japan, France, Germany, Sweden,
and the United Kingdom.
2 Quarterly rates are for the first month of the quarter.
NOTE: Quarterly figures for France and Germany are
calculated by applying annual adjustment factors to current
published data, and therefore should be viewed as less precise
indicators of unemployment under U.S. concepts than the annual
figures.

5.6
6.8
6.8
5.5
8.6
8.1
9.4
5.1
5.2

4.8
6.5
6.8
5.2
8.5
8.0
9.5
5.0
5.1

5.6
7.1
6.6
5.3
8.7
8.2
9.2
5.0
5.1

IV

III

II

I

IV

III

II

I

5.9
6.9
6.3
5.4
8.7
8.4
9.1
5.0
5.2

5.7
7.0
6.2
5.5
8.9
8.5
9.1
5.2
5.3

5.9
6.9
6.1
5.5
8.9
8.6
9.0
5.4
5.1

See "Notes on the data" for information on breaks in series. For
further qualifications and historical data, see C o m p a r a tiv e C ivilian
L a b o r F o rce S ta tis tic s , T e n C o u n tr ie s , 1 9 5 9 -2 0 0 2 (Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Apr. 14,2003), on the Internet at
http://www.bls.gov/fls/home.htm

Monthly and quarterly unemployment rates, updated monthly, are
s»kn n n t h k «¡tP

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

117

Current Labor Statistics:

48.

International Comparison

Annual data: Employment status of the working-age population, approximating U.S. concepts, 10 countries

[Numbers in thousands]_____________

______Employment status and country

Civilian labor force
United States..........................................
Canada................................................
Australia................................................
Japan...................................................
France..................................................
Germany...............................................
Italy......................................................
Netherlands............................................
Sweden................................................
United Kingdom.......................................
Participation rate1
UnitedStates..........................................
Canada.................................................
Australia................................................
Japan...................................................
France..................................................
Germany...............................................
Italy......................................................
Netherlands............................................
Sweden.................................................
United Kingdom.......................................
Employed
United States...........................................
Canada.................................................
Australia................................................
Japan...................................................
France...................................................
Germany................................................
Italy......................................................
Netherlands............................................
Sweden.................................................
United Kingdom........................................

1992

1993

1994

128,10f 129.20C 131,056
14,17'
14.30Ê
14.40C
8,55"
8,61C
8,771
65.04C 65.47C 65.78C
24.44C 24,480 24.67C
39,01C 39,100 39.07C
22,91
22,570 22.45C
6.92C
7,020
7,150
4.52C
4,443
4,418
28,41C 28,050 27,990
66.4
65.9
63.9
63.4
55.6
58.2
47.5
57.5
65.7
63.1

66.3
65.5
63.5
63.3
55.4
57.7
47.9
58.0
64.5
62.5

66.6
65.2
63.9
63.1
55.5
57.4
47.3|
58.6
63.7
62.3

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

132,304
14,517
8,996
65,990
24,750
38,980
22,460
7,200
4,460
28,040

133.94C
14.66S
9,115
66.45C
25.00C
39.14C
22,570
7,390
4,459
28,140

136,297
14,956
9,204
67.20C
25.13C
39.42C
22,680
7,530
4,418
28,270

137,670
15,237
9,336
67,240
25,440
39,750
22,960
7,610
4,402
28,380

139.36E
15,536
9,460
67.09C
25.80C
39.80C
23,130
7,830
4,430
28,610

142.58C
15,78£
9,67E
66.99C
26.05C
39.75C
23,340
8,130
4,489
28,780

143,734
16,027
9,817
66.87C
26.34C
39.78C
23,540
8,290
4,530
28,870

144,863
16,475
9,964
66,240

66.6
64.9
64.6
62.9
55.4
57.1
47.1
58.7
64.1
62.3

66.8
64.7
64.6
63.0
55.6
57.1
47.1
60.0
64.0
62.3

67.1
65.0
64.3
63.2
55.5
57.3
47.2
60.8
63.3
62.4

67.1
65.4
64.3
62.8
55.9
57.7
47.6
61.0
62.8
62.5

67.1
65.8
64.2
62.4
56.3
57.6
47.8
62.4
62.8
62.7

67.1
65.9
64.7
62.0
56.5
57.4
48.1
64.4
63.8
62.8

66.8
66.0
64.7
61.6
56.8
57
48.3
65.4
63.7
62.7

66.9
66.8
64.7
60.8

118,492
12,672
7,660
63,620
22,000
36,390
21,230
6,550
4,265
25,530

120,259
12,770
7,699
63,810
21,710
35,990
20,270
6,570
4,028
25,120

123,060
13,027
7,942
63,860
21,750
35,760
19,940
6,660
3,992
25,320

124,900
13,271
8,256
63,890
21,950
35,780
19,820
6,730
4,056
25,600

126,708
13,380
8,364
64,200
22,040
35,640
19,920
6,950
4,019
25,850

129,558
13,705
8,444
64,900
22,170
35,510
19,990
7,160
3,973
26,290

131,463
14,068
8,618
64,450
22,580
36,060
20,210
7,310
4,034
26,600

133,488
14,456
8,808
63,920
23,070
36,360
20,460
7,580
4,117
26,890

61.5
58.9
57.2
62.0
50.1
54.2
44.0
54.5
62.0
56.7

61.7
58.5
56.8
61.7
49.1
53.2
43.0
54.2
58.5
56.0

62.5
59.0
57.8
61.3
49.0
52.6
42.0
54.6
57.6
56.4

62.9
59.4
59.2
60.9
49.1
52.4
41.5
54.9
58.3
56.9

63.2
59.1
59.3
60.9
49.0
52.0
41.6
56.4
57.7
57.3

63.8
59.7
59.0
61.0
49.0
51.6
41.6
57.8
56.9
58.1

64.1
60.4
59.3
60.2
49.6
52.3
41.9
58.6
57.6
58.6

64.3
61.3
59.8
59.4
50.4
52.6
42.3
60.4
58.4
59.0

Employment-population ratio2
United States...........................................
Canada..................................................
Australia.................................................
Japan....................................................
France...................................................
Germany................................................
Italy.......................................................
Netherlands.............................................
Sweden..................................................
United Kingdom........................................
Unemployed
United States...........................................
Canada..................................................
Australia.................................................
Japan....................................................
France....................................................
Germany.................................................
Italy.......................................................
Netherlands.............................................
Sweden..................................................
United Kingdom.........................................

9,613
1,505
897
1,420
2,430
2,620
1,680
370
255
2,880

8,940
1,539
914
1,660
2,770
3,110
2,300
440
415
2,930

7,996
1,373
829
1,920
2,920
3,320
2,510
490
426
2,670

7,404
1,246
739
2,100
2,800
3,200
2,640
480
404
2,440

7,236
1,289
751
2,250
2,970
3,510
2,650
440
440
2,290

6,739
1,252
760
2,300
2,960
3,910
2,690
370
445
1,980

6,210
1,169
721
2,790
2,870
3,690
2,750
300
368
1,780

Unemployment rate
UnitedStates............................................
Canada...................................................
Australia..................................................
Japan.....................................................
France....................................................
Germany.................................................
Italy.......................................................
Netherlands..............................................
Sweden...................................................
United Kingdom................ ........................

7.5
10.6
10.5
2.2
9.9
6.7
7.3
5.3
5.6
10.1

6.9
10.8
10.6
2.5
11.3
8.0
10.2
6.3
9.3
10.4

6.1
9.5
9.4
2.9
11.8
8.5
11.2
6.9
9.6
9.5

5.6
8.6
8.2
3.2
11.3
8.2
11.8
6.7
9.1
8.7

5.4
8.8
8.2
3.4
11.9
9.0
11.7
6.0
9.9
8.1

4.9
8.4
8.3
3.4
11.8
9.9
11.9
4.9
10.1
7.0

4.5
7.7
7.7
4.1
11.3
9.3
12.0
3.9
8.4
6.3

1 Labor force as a percent of the working-age population.
2 Employment as a percent of the working-age population.
NOTE: See notes on the data for information on breaks inseries.

118

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

5,880
1,080
658
3,170
2,730
3,440
2,670
250
313
1,720
4.2
7.0
7.0
4.7
10.6
8.6
11.5
3.2
7.1
6.01

136,891 136,933
14,827
14,997
9,068
9,157
63,790
63,470
23,670
24,100
36,540
36,590
20,840 21,270
7,900
8,090
4,229
4,303
27,200 27,400
64.4
62.1
60.6
59.0
51.4
52.7
42.9
62.6
60.1
59.4
5,692
962
611
3,200
2,380
3,210
2,500
220
260
1,580

6,801
1,031
661
3,400
2,240
3,190
2,270
200
227
1,470

4.0
6.1
6.3
4.8
9.1
8.1
10.7
2.7
5.8
5.5

4.7
6.4
6.7
5.1
8.5
8.0
9.6
2.4
5.0
5.1

For further qualifications and historical data, see C om parative Civilian L abor F orce
1959-2001 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Apr. 14, 2003),
on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/fls/home.htm
Dash indicates data are not available.

S ta tis tic s , Ten C oun tries,

63.7
61.9
60.4
58.4
51.9
52.6
43.6
63.9
60.5
59.5

-

23,750
-

4,542
—

48.6
63.6
136,485
15,325
9,334
62,650
21,580
4,308

62.7
62.4
60.6
57.5
44.1
60.3
8,378
1,150
629
3,590
2,160
234

5.8
7.0
6.3
5.4
8.8
8.4
9.1
5.2
5.2

49.

Annual indexes of manufacturing productivity and related measures, 12 countries
Item and country
Output per hour

Belgium..................................................
Denmark................................................
Germany................................................
Netherlands.............................................
United Kingdom........................................
Output

1980

1970

1960

_

_

37.8
13.8
18.0
29.9
22.0
29.2
23.6
18.5
37.4
27.3
30.0

54.9
37.5
32.9
52.7
43.1
52.0
44.3
37.9
58.8
52.2
43.2

1990

1991

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1999

1998

132.7
120.4
109.9
128.5
103.6
149.7
111.6

145.6
116.1
128.1
134.1
“
146.3
128.2
115.0

135.3
116.0
126.9
129.5

121.9
119.4
109.9
122.3
102.0
132.3
105.2

96.9
93.4
94.4
96.8
99.1
93.8
99.0
95.8
98.5
97.6
94.6
89.2

97.9
95.3
99.0
99.1
99.4
97.0
98.3
95.9
99.6
98.2
95.5
93.8

102.1
105.8
101.7
102.5
100.8
100.6
101.8
101.4
101.6
99.6
107.3
103.9

107.3
110.8
103.3
108.4
108.2
109.5
104.9
113.2
99.6
119.4
107.1

113.8
112.4
111.0
113.2

117.0
109.7
116.1
117.0

121.3
113.5
121.0
127.0

113.9
112.2
108.0
118.2
100.7
121.9
104.9

114.6
113.9
108.1
120.2
102.5
124.5
103.8

2001

142.9
118.4
134.1
133.4
“
142.5
127.9
113.0
133.8
104.5
158.0
118.0

126.5
113.1
121.2
129.2
127.7
120.3
110.0
125.0
99.9
139.5
107.0

70.5
72.9
63.2
65.4
90.4
66.8
77.2
74.2
68.8
77.5
73.1
54.3

2000

105.3
160.4
119.8

_

_

33.4
10.7
30.7
40.8
31.0
41.5
23.0
31.5
57.4
45.9
67.3

58.9
39.2
57.6
68.0
64.1
70.9
48.1
59.1
90.6
80.7
90.2

75.8
83.6
60.4
78.2
91.4
88.7
85.3
84.4
76.8
104.4
90.7
87.2

101.6
106.0
97.1
101.0
102.8
99.1
99.1
99.4
99.9
100.9
110.1
105.4

98.3
99.0
102.0
100.7
101.5
99.8
102.3
99.3
100.4
99.0
104.1
100.0

103.5
105.9
96.3
97.0
95.6
95.7
92.4
96.5
98.4
101.7
101.9
101.4

111.1
114.1
94.9
101.4
105.6
100.3
95.1
102.4
104.6
104.6
117.1
106.1

118.4
119.6
98.9
104.2
111.6
104.9
95.2
107.2
108.1
107.3
128.4
107.8

121.3
119.6
103.0
106.6
106.7
104.6
92.5
105.4
108.7
110.3
131.1
108.5

127.9
127.7
106.5
113.8
115.2
109.7
95.7
108.8
111.5
114.2
138.0
109.9

133.1
132.8
100.2
116.4
115.7
115.0
97.2
110.7
114.8
113.7
147.6
110.8

141.2
141.0
101.9
118.0
115.1
118.7
95.8
110.5
118.1
113.6
157.8
111.1

147.0
148.8
107.6
122.2
122.9
124.1
101.7
113.9
123.7
110.2
168.7
113.3

141.3
143.9
99.1
121.7
126.7
126.3
101.8
114.6
108.9
167.4
110.7

92.1
88.3
77.8
170.7
136.5
140.8
142.3
97.6
170.5
153.6
168.3
224.6

104.4
107.1
104.4
174.7
129.0
148.5
136.3
108.5
156.1
153.9
154.7
208.8

107.5
114.6
95.6
119.7
101.1
132.9
110.5
113.8
111.7
134.7
124.0
160.5

104.8
113.5
102.9
104.3
103.7
105.6
100.1
103.7
101.4
103.4
116.4
118.1

100.4
103.9
103.1
101.5
102.1
102.9
104.1
103.6
100.9
100.8
109.0
106.6

101.4
100.1
94.7
94.7
94.8
95.1
90.8
95.2
96.8
102.1
94.9
97.6

103.6
103.0
91.9
93.6

103.6
109.0
88.7
91.1
“
91.3
81.2
97.5
90.4
107.6
105.3
104.5

105.4
112.4
88.0
89.6
90.0
80.1
99.0
91.1
112.0
104.3
104.5

105.2
117.5
82.7
90.1

104.4
121.5
80.3
91.1

102.8
125.6
80.2
91.7

92.7
86.8
97.6
92.4
105.0
98.1
99.1

104.0
106.4
89.1
92.0
“
92.1
84.9
99.3
91.5
106.6
105.3
102.7

90.0
80.7
100.6
91.8
113.7
105.8
103.6

89.4
79.6
100.5
92.0
109.6
105.4
99.6

87.1
79.5
100.7
92.5
105.4
106.8
96.0

97.1
123.9
77.4
90.7
“
86.3
78.8
99.7
103.4
104.3
92.4

14.9
10.0
4.3
5.4
4.6
4.3
8.1
1.8
6.4

23.7
17.1
16.4
13.7
13.3
10.4
20.7
5.3
20.2
11 8
10.7
6.1

55.6
47.6
58.5
52.5
49.6
40.9
53.6
30.4
64.4
39.0
37.3
32.1

90.8
88.3
90.5
90.1
92.7
90.9
89.4
87.6
90.9
92.3
87.8
82.9

95.6
95.0
96.4
97.3
95.9
96.4
91.5
94.2
95.3
97.5
95.5
93.8

102.7
102.0
102.8
104.8
104.6
102.6
106.4
105.7
103.8
101.5
97.4
104.6

105.6
103.7
104.9
106.1
106.0
111.7
106.8
108.2
104.4
100.0
106.7

107.9
106.0
108.3
109.2
110.0
117.5
111.3
110.7
109.2
106.5
107.9

109.4
107.0
109.2
110.9
112.1
122.3
119.0
113.0
113.6
114.4
109.5

111.5
109.3
112.9
114.9
112.0
124.7
123.0
115.8
118.7
119.4
113.9

117.4
110.5
115.8
116.6

122.1
112.3
115.2
118.3

133.1
117.8
115.0
125.9

112.6
126.5
122.2
120.6
125.7
124.4
120.5

116.3
129.3
124.6
124.0
133.0
129.3
129.6

131.1
113.9
114.5
121.1
“
120.8
133.5
127.8
131.0
140.C
131.8
135.2

_

_

26.4
31.3
30.1
15.4
19.4
27.8
7.5
34.6
12.7
15.0
9.8

31.1
43.8
41.7
25.2
24.0
39.8
11.9
53.3
20.1
20.6
14.1

78.8
65.2
92.5
80.3
54.9
61.3
69.4
41.0
93.7
50.3
51.0
59.0

93.7
94.6
95.9
93.0
93.5
96.9
90.3
91.5
92.3
94.6
92.9
92.9

97.6
99.6
97.4
98.1
96.5
99.3
93.1
98.2
95.6
99.2
100.0
100.1

100.6
96.4
101.1
102.3
103.7
101.9
104.6
104.2
102.1
101.9
90.6
100.6

98.5
93.6
101.5
97.9
96.2
97.9
102.0
101.9
95.6
104.8
83.8
99.7

94.8
94.3
97.6
96.4
96.4
96.6
104.7
103.0
93.7
108.4
87.4
102.9

93.5
97.5
94.0
94.7
103.7
97.8
107.4
110.0
94.0
110.8
91.9
105.5

91.9
96.2
93.3
90.5
99.7
91.9
104.4
111.9
94.7
116.4
90.2
108.2

92.8
97.7
95.5
90.2
102.9
88.2
105.2
111.1
96.5
125.7
89.2
112.7

90.2
96.8
90.8
91.4
105.4
87.7
107.4
113.4
96.6
128.4
86.3
116.2

91.7
96.1
85.4
90.8
101.8
84.8
104.4
113.1
97.9
134.0
83.4
114.5

91.4
101.5
89.8
93.9
101.7
86.5
106.6
115.4

90.2
92.8
91.9
93.5
94.8
98.6
93.7
97.6 100.6
78.8
78.8
84.C 79.6
83.C 86.4
82.8
90.6
98.C 105.1
36.C 67.4
32.9
92.4 101.2
97.7
83.8
91.7 115.4 125.S 131.7 109.6
15.8
51.8
11.0
77.6
79.9
98.4
81.2
94.2 105.2
95.
92.6
19.4
27.C 88.C 89.8
92.7
91.0
91
.C
108.0
91.4
1
04.C
91.6
96.6
58.8
91.£
13.4
20.2
75.4
79.1
83.C
93.4 103.8 101.2
95.2
94.1
93.1
76.8
21.C 23.C
91.4
93.5
94.C
98.'
98.2 114.2 111.8
87.8
87.6
10.4
17.1
59.6
76.2
78.6
87.2
80.6
77.2
77.2
94.1
97.8
81.6
59.C
15.C 23.2
82.1
85.6
85.6
92.4 102.“ 98.1
96.
89.2
89.1
82.2
25.2
16.1
102.2
103.8
102.1
106.8
106/
92.6
89.,
9
5
.C
94.C
17.£
63.6
11.1
60.6
65.C
68.6
79.6
63.2
71.6
67.
96..
91.6
70.2
23.
16.2
93.2 100/ 105.“ 106/
91.2
85.61 86/
93.2 100.
77.'
19.
i5.e
United Kingdom......................................
NOTE: DataforGermany foryears before 1991 are forthe former West Germany. Datafor 1991 onwardare for unified Germany. Dash indicates data not available.

91.7
78.2
100.4
66.6
75.2
63.2
76.2
66.4
72.1
94.8
53.C
98.6

91.4
79.2
93.6
67.0
73.7
62.5
76.2
65.7
96.8
48.2
95.5

January 2004

119

Japan....................................................
Denmark................................................
Italy.......................................................
Netherlands.............................................
Norway..................................................
Sweden..................................................
United Kingdom........................................
Total hours

United States...........................................
Canada..................................................
Japan....................................................
Belgium..................................................
Denmark................................... .............

Netherlands.............................................
United Kingdom........................................
Compensation per hour

United States...........................................
Belgium.................................................

4.1
3.0
Unit labor costs:

National currency basis

Unit labor costs:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

U.S. dollar basis

Monthly Labor Review

~

126.6
137.7
132.6
147.6
137.2
140.4

-

140.1
85.5
117.2

Current Labor Statistics:

50.

Injury and Illness

Occupational injury and illness rates by industry,1 United States
Incidence rates per 100 full-time workers3

Industry and type of case2
1989 1

1990

1991

1992

1993 4 1994 4 1995 4 1996 4 1997 4 1998 4 1999 4 2000 4 2001 4

PRIVATE SECTOR5

Total cases.............................................
Lost workday cases....................................
Lost workdays...........................................

8.6
4.0
78.7

8.6
4.1
84.0

8.4
3.9
86.5

8.9
3.9
93.8

8.£
3.8

10.9
5.7
100.9

11.6
5.9
112.2

10.8
5.4
108.3

11.6
5.4
126.9

8.5
4.8
137.2

8.3
5.0
119.5

7.4
4.5
129.6

14.3
6.8
143.3

14.2
6.7
147.9

13.9
6.5
137.3

8.4
3.8

8.1
3.6

7.4
3.4

7.1
3.3

6.7
3.1

6.3
3.0

6.1
3.0

5.7
2.8

11.2
5.0

10.0
4.7

9.7
4.3

8.7
3.9

8.4
4.1

7.9
3.9

7.3
3.4

7.1
3.6

7.3
3.6

7.3
4.1
204.7

6.8
3.9

6.3
3.9

6.2
3.9

5.4
3.2
-

5.9
3.7
-

4.9
2.9
-

4.4
2.7

4.7
3.0

4.0
2.4

13.0
6.1
148.1

13.1
5.8
161.9

12.2
5.5

11.8
5.5

10.6
4.9

9.9
4.5
-

9.5
4.4

8.8
4.0

8.6
4.2

8.3
4.1

7.9
4.0

13.4
6.4
137.6

12.0
5.5
132.0

12.2
5.4
142.7

11.5
5.1
-

10.9
5.1

9.8
4.4

9.0
4.0
-

8.5
3.7

8.4
3.9

8.0
3.7
-

7.8
3.9

6.9
3.5

13.8
6.5
147.1

13.8
6.3
144.6

12.8
6.0
160.1

12.1
5.4
165.8

11.1
5.1

10.2
5.0
-

9.9
4.8

9.0
4.3
-

8.7
4.3
-

8.2
4.1

7.8
3.8

7.6
3.7

7.8
4.0

14.6
6.9
144.9

14.7
6.9
153.1

13.5
6.3
151.3

13.8
6.1
168.3

12.8
5.8

12.5
5.8
-

11.1
5.0
-

10.4
4.8
-

10.0
4.7
-

9.1
4.1
-

8.9
4.4
-

8.6
4.3

8.2
4.1

13.1
5.8
113.0

13.2
5.8
120.7

12.7
5.6
121.5

12.5
5.4
124.6

12.1
5.3
-

12.2
5.5
-

11.6
5.3
-

10.6
4.9
-

10.3
4.8

9.7
4.7

9.2
4.6

9.0
4.5

8.1
4.1

14.1
6.0
116.5

14.2
6.0
123.3

13.6
5.7
122.9

13.4
5.5
126.7

13.1
5.4

13.5
5.7

12.8
5.6

11.6
5.1

11.3
5.1

10.7
5.0
-

10.1
4.8

18.4
9.4
177.5

18.1
8.8
172.5

16.8
8.3
172.0

16.3
7.6
165.8

15.9
7.6

15.7
7.7

14.9
7.0

14.2
6.8
-

13.5
6.5
-

13.2
6.8
-

13.0
6.7

12.1
6.1

10.6
5.5

16.1
7.2
”

16.9
7.8
“

15.9
7.2
“

14.8
6.6
128.4

14.6
6.5
-

15.0
7.0
-

13.9
6.4
-

12.2
5.4
-

12.0
5.8
-

11.4
5.7
-

11.5
5.9
-

11.2
5.9
-

11.0
5.7

15.5
7.4
149.8

15.4
7.3
160.5

14.8
6.8
156.0

13.6
6.1
152.2

13.8
6.3
-

13.2
6.5
-

12.3
5.7
-

12.4
6.0
-

11.8
5.7
-

11.8
6.0
-

10.7
5.4
-

10.4
5.5

10.1
5.1

18.7
8.1
168.3

19.0
8.1
180.2

17.7
7.4
169.1

17.5
7.1
175.5

17.0
7.3
-

16.8
7.2
-

16.5
7.2
-

15.0
6.8
-

15.0
7.2
-

14.0
7.0
-

12.9
6.3
-

12.6
6.3

10.7
5.3
11.1

18.5
7.9
147.6

18.7
7.9
155.7

17.4
7.1
146.6

16.8
6.6
144.0

16.2
6.7
-

16.4
6.7
-

15.8
6.9
-

14.4
6.2
-

14.2
6.4
-

13.9
6.5
-

12.6
6.0

11.9
5.5

11.1
5.3

12.1
4.8
86.8

12.0
4.7
88.9

11.2
4.4
86.6

11.1
4.2
87.7

11.1
4.2
-

11.6
4.4
-

11.2
4.4
-

9.9
4.0
-

10.0
4.1
-

9.5
4.0
-

8.5
3.7
-

8.2
3.6

11.0
6.0

9.1
3.9
77.5

9.1
3.8
79.4

8.6
3.7
83.0

8.4
3.6
81.2

8.3
3.5
-

8.3
3.6
-

7.6
3.3
-

6.8
3.1
-

6.6
3.1
-

5.9
2.8
-

5.7
2.8
-

5.7
2.9

5.0
2.5

17.7
6.8
138.6

17.8
6.9
153.7

18.3
7.0
166.1

18.7
7.1
186.6

18.5
7.1
-

19.6
7.8
-

18.6
7.9
-

16.3
7.0
-

15.4
6.6
-

14.6
6.6
-

13.7
6.4
-

13.7
6.3

12.6
6.0

5.6
2.5
55.4

5.9
2.7
57.8

6.0
2.7
64.4

5.9
2.7
65.3

5.6
2.5
-

5.9
2.7
-

5.3
2.4
-

5.1
2.3
-

4.8
2.3
-

4.0
1.9
-

4.0
1.8

4.5
2.2

4.0
2.0

11.1
11.3
5.1
5.1
97.6J 113.1

11.3
5.1
104.0

10.7
5.0
108.2

10.0
4.6
-

9.9
4.5
-

9.1
4.3
-

9.5
4.4
-

8.9
4.2
-

8.1
3.9
-

8.4
4.0
-

7.2
3.6
-

6.4
3.2

-

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing5

Total cases.............................................
Lost workday cases....................................
Lost workdays...........................................
Mining

Total cases..............................................
Lost workday cases....................................
Lost workdays...........................................
Construction

Total cases................................
Lost workday cases......................
Lost workdays.............................
General building contractors:
Total cases................................
Lost workday cases.......................
Lost workdays.............................
Heavy construction, except building:
Total cases................................
Lost workday cases.......................
Lost workdays..............................
Special trades contractors:
Total cases................................
Lost workday cases.......................
Lost workdays..............................
Manufacturing

Total cases.................................
Lost workday cases.......................
Lost workdays..............................
Durable goods:
Total cases...................
Lost workday cases..........
Lost workdays.................
Lumber and wood products:
Total cases.................
Lost workday cases........
Lost workdays..............
Furniture and fixtures:
Total cases.................
Lost workday cases........
Lost workdays...............
Stone, clay, and glass products:
Total cases.................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Primary metal industries:
Total cases.................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Fabricated metal products:
Total cases.................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Industrial machinery and equipment:
Total cases.................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Electronic and other electrical equipment:
Total cases..................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Transportation equipment:
Total cases..................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Instruments and related products:
Total cases..................................
Lost workday cases........................
Lost workdays...............................
Miscellaneous manufacturing industries:
Total cases................................
Lost workday cases......................
Lost workdays.............................
See footnotes at end of table.

120

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2004

8.8
4.3

50. Continued—Occupational injury and illness rates by industry,' United States
In c id e n c e r a te s p e r 1 0 0 w o r k e r s 3

Industry and type of case

Nondurable goods:
Total cases...............................................................
Lost workday cases......................................................
Lost workdays.............................................................
Food and kindred products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases....................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Tobacco products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases....................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Textile mill products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workdaycases....................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Apparel and other textile products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases....................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Paper and allied products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases...................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Printinqand publishing:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases...................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Chemicals and allied products:
Total cases.................................... ........................
Lost workday cases...................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Petroleumandcoal products:
Total cases............................................................
Lost workday cases....................................................
Lost workdays..........................................................
Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workdaycases...................................................
Lost workdays.........................................................
Leather and leather products:
Total cases.............................................................
Lost workday cases...................................................
Lost workdays.........................................................

1989

1

1990

1991

1992

1993"

1994 4 1995 4 1996 4 1997 4

11.6
5.5
107.8

11.7
5.6
116.9

11.5
5.5
119.7

11.3
5.3
121.8

10.7
5.0
-

10.5
5.1
-

9.9
4.9
-

9.2
4.6
-

8.8
4.4

8.2
4.3
-

7.8
4.2
-

7.8
4.2
-

6.8
3.8
“

18.5
9.3
174.7

20.0
9.9
202.6

19.5
9.9
207.2

18.8
9.5
211.9

17.6
8.9
-

17.1
9.2
-

16.3
8.7
-

15.0
8.0
-

14.5
8.0
-

13.6
7.5

12.7
7.3
-

12.4
7.3
-

10.9
6.3
-

8.7
3.4
64.2

7.7
3.2
62.3

6.4
2.8
52.0

6.0
2.4
42.9

5.8
2.3
-

5.3
2.4
-

5.6
2.6
-

6.7
2.8
-

5.9
2.7
-

6.4
3.4
-

5.5
2.2
-

6.2
3.1
-

6.7
4.2
-

10.3
4.2
81.4

9.6
4.0
85.1

10.1
4.4
88.3

9.9
4.2
87.1

9.7
4.1
-

8.7
4.0
-

8.2
4.1
-

7.8
3.6
-

6.7
3.1
-

7.4
3.4
-

6.4
3.2
-

6.0
3.2
-

5.2
2.7
-

8.6
3.8
80.5

8.8
3.9
92.1

9.2
4.2
99.9

9.5
4.0
104.6

9.0
3.8

8.9
3.9
-

8.2
3.6
-

7.4
3.3
-

7.0
3.1
-

6.2
2.6

-

5.8
2.8
-

6.1
3.0
-

5.0
2.4
“

12.7
5.8
132.9

12.1
5.5
124.8

11.2
5.0
122.7

11.0
5.0
125.9

9.9
4.6
-

9.6
4.5
-

8.5
4.2
-

7.9
3.8
-

7.3
3.7
-

7.1
3.7
-

7.0
3.7

6.5
3.4
-

6.0
3.2

6.9
3.3
63.8

6.9
3.3
69.8

6.7
3.2
74.5

7.3
3.2
74.8

6.9
3.1
-

6.7
3.0
-

6.4
3.0
-

6.0
2.8
-

5.7
2.7
-

5.4
2.8
-

5.0
2.6
-

5.1
2.6

4.6
2.4
“

7.0
3.2
63.4

6.5
3.1
61.6

6.4
3.1
62.4

6.0
2.8
64.2

5.9
2.7
-

5.7
2.8
-

5.5
2.7
-

4.8
2.4
-

4.8
2.3
-

4.2
2.1
-

4.4
2.3

4.2
2.2

4.0
2.1

6.6
3.3
68.1

6.6
3.1
77.3

6.2
2.9
68.2

5.9
2.8
71.2

5.2
2.5
-

4.7
2.3
-

4.8
2.4
-

4.6
2.5
-

4.3
2.2
-

3.9
1.8
-

4.1
1.8
“

3.7
1.9
“

2.9
1.4

16.2
8.0
147.2

16.2
7.8
151.3

15.1
7.2
150.9

14.5
6.8
153.3

13.9
6.5
-

14.0
6.7
-

12.9
6.5
-

12.3
6.3
-

11.9
5.8
-

11.2
5.8
-

10.1
5.5

10.7
5.8
“

8.7
4.8
“

13.6
6.5
130.4

12.1
5.9
152.3

12.5
5.9
140.8

12.1
5.4
128.5

12.1
5.5
-

12.0
5.3
-

11.4
4.8
-

10.7
4.5

10.6
4.3
“

9.8
4.5

10.3
5.0

9.0
4.3

8.7
4.4
“

9.2
5.3
121.5

9.6
5.5
134.1

9.3
5.4
140.0

9.1
5.1
144.0

9.5
5.4
-

9.3
5.5
-

9.1
5.2
-

8.7
5.1
-

8.2
4.8
~

7.3
4.3

7.3
4.4
“

6.9
4.3
“

6.9
4.3

8.0
3.6
63.5

7.9
3.5
65.6

7.6
3.4
72.0

8.4
3.5
80.1

8.1
3.4
-

7.9
3.4
-

7.5
3.2
-

6.8
2.9
-

6.7
3.0
-

6.5
2.8
-

6.1
2.7
-

5.9
2.7

6.6
2.5
“

7.7
4.0
71.9

7.4
3.7
71.5

7.2
3.7
79.2

7.6
3.6
82.4

7.8
3.7

7.7
3.8

7.5
3.6
-

6.6
3.4
-

6.5
3.2
-

6.5
3.3
-

6.2
3.3
-

5.8
3.1
-

5.3
2.8
-

8.1
3.4
60.0

8.1
3.4
63.2

7.7
3.3
69.1

8.7
3.4
79.2

8.2
3.3
-

7.S
3.3
-

7.5
3.0
-

6.E
2.8
-

6.8
2.9
-

6.5
2.7

6.1
2.5
“

5.9
2.5

5.7
2.4
-

2.0
.9
17.6

2.4
1.1
27.3

2.4
1.1
24.1

2.9
1.2
32.9

2.9
1.2
-

2.7
1.1
-

2.6
1.0
-

2.4
.9
-

2.2
.9

.7
.5

1.8
.8

1.S
.8

1.8
.7
”

5.5
2.7
51.2

6.0
2.8
56.4

6.2
2.8
60.0

Transportation and public utilities

Lost workday cases.....................................................
Lost workdays............................................................
Wholesale and retail trade

Lost workday cases.....................................................
Lost workdays............................................................
Wholesale trade:
Lost workdays............................................................
Retail trade:
Lost workdaycases.....................................................
Lost workdays............................................................
Finance, insurance, and real estate

Lost workdaycases.....................................................
Lost workdays............................................................
Services

Lost workday cases.....................................................
Lost workdays............................................................

1 Data for 1989 and subsequent years are based on the S tan dard Industrial C la ss­
1987 Edition. Forthis reason, they are not strictlycomparable withdata
for the years 1985-88, which were based on the S tan dard Industrial Classification
M anual, 1972 Edition, 1977 Supplement.
2 Beginning withthe 1992 survey, the annual survey measures only nonfatal injuries and
illnesses, while past surveys covered both fatal and nonfatal incidents. To better address
fatalities, a basic element of workplace safety, BLS implemented the Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries.
3 The incidence rates represent the number of injuries and illnesses or lost workdays per
100 full-time workers and were calculated as (N/EH) X 200,000, where:
ification M anual,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1998 4 1999 4 2000 4 2001 4

-

~

4.Ç
4.S
4.6
6.4
5.6
5.2
6.0
7.1
6.7
6.5
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.5
2.8
2.6
3.0
2.8
2.8
68.6
“
“
N=number of injuries and illnesses or lost workdays;
EH=total hours worked by all employees duringthe calendar year; and
200,000 = base for 100 full-time equivalent workers (working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks
per year).
4 Beginning withthe 1993 survey, lost workday estimates will not be generated. As of 1992,
BLS began generating percent distributions and the median number of days away fromwork
by industry and for groups of workers sustaining similarworkdisabilities.
5 Excludes farms withfewerthan 11 employees since 1976.
NOTE: Dash indicates d ata not available.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2004

121

Current Labor Statistics:

51.

Injury and Illness

Fatal occupational injuries by event or exposure, 1997-2002
Fatalities

Event or exposure1

1997-2001
average

Total.................................................
Transportation incidents......................................
Highway incident.............................................
Collision between vehicles, mobile equipment...........
Moving in same direction...............................
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming.......................
Moving in intersection...................................
Vehicle struck stationary object or equipment...................
Noncollision incident.......................................
Jackknifed or overturned—no collision.........................
Nonhighway (farm, industrial premises) incident.....................
Overturned............................................
Aircraft....................................................
Worker struck by a vehicle...............................
Water vehicle.....................................
Rail vehicle.........................................
Assaults and violent acts........................................
Homicides........................................
Shooting.........................................
Stabbing.............................................
Other, including bombing..............................
Self-inflicted injuries....................................
Contact with objects and equipment...................................
Struck by object..........................................
Struck by falling object..........................................
Struck by flying object.......................................
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects..................
Caught in running equipment or machinery.........................
Caught in or crushed in collapsing materials..........................
Fall to lower level.....................................
Fall fromladder..............................................
Fall fromroof................................................
Fall fromscaffold, staging...........................................
Fall on same level.................................................
Exposure to harmful substances or environments................
Contact with electric current......................................
Contact with overhead power lines........................
Contact with temperature extremes...................................
Exposure to caustic, noxious, or allergenic substances............
Inhalation of substances.......................................
Oxygen deficiency...................................................
Drowning, submersion.....................................
Fires and explosions...................................................
Other events or exposures3................................
1 Based on the 1992 BLS Occupational Injury and Illness
Classification Structures.
2 The BLS news release issued Sept. 25, 2002, reported a
total of 5,900 fatal work Injuries for calendar year 2001. Since
then, an additional 15 job-related fatalities were Identified,
bringing the total job-related fatality count for 2001 to 5,915.

122

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2 593
1,421
697
126
254
148
300
369
300
368
202

20012
Number

2002
Number

Percent

1,409
727

1,372
635

25
11

257

202

4

297

326

6

158

164

3

382
99

383
90

356
71

6
1

964
709
567
64
78
221
995
562
352
58
290
156
126
737
654
111
155
91
61
529
291
134
41
106
52
89
71
197

908

840

15

509
58
76
230
962

469
58
82
199
873

8
1
1
4
16

343
60
266
144
122
810
700
123
159
91
84
499
285
124
35
96
49
83
59
188

303
38

5
1

?73

110
116
714
634
126
143
87
63
538
289
122
60
98
49
90
60
165

2
2
13
11
2
3
2
1
10
5
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
21
24
13
Totals for 2001 exclude fatalities from the September 11
terrorist attacks.
4 Includes the category "Bodily reaction and exertion."
NOTE: Totals for major categories may Include subcategories not shown separately. Percentages may not add
to totals because of rounding. Dash indicates less than 0.5
percent.

January 2004

Where are you publishing
your research?
The Monthly Labor Revie w welcomes articles on the
labor force, labor-management relations, business
conditions, industry productivity, compensation,
occupational safety and health, demographic trends
and other economic developments. Papers should be
factual, and analytical, not polemical in tone.
Potential articles, as well as comments on

^s

material published in the Review, should be
submitted to:
Editor-in-Chief
Monthly Labor Review
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Washington, DC 20212
Telephone: (202) 691-5900
E-mail: mlr@bls.aov

Need more research, facts, and analysis?
Subscribe to Monthly Labor Review today!
United States Government

IN F O R M A T IO N
C red it card o rd ers are w elco m e!

Order Processing Code:

F ax y o u r o rd ers (202) 51 2 -2 2 5 0

*5551

P h on e yo u r o rd ers (2 0 2 )5 1 2 -1 8 0 0

□ YES, please s e n d _______ subscriptions to:
Monthly Labor Review (MLR) at $49 each ($68.60 foreign) per year.
The total cost of my order is $ _________ .

For privacy protection, check the box below:

Price includes regular shipping & handling and is subject to change.

□ Do not make my name available to other mailers
Check method of payment:

Name or title

(Please type or print )

Company name

Room, floor, suite

□

Check payable to: Superintendent of Documents

yo

□ GPO Deposit Account

Street address
State

City

Zipcode +4

Daytime phone including area code
Purchase order number (optional)
M ail to:

Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954,
Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954

Important: Please include this completed order form with your
remittance.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

□ VISA

□ MasterCard

□ Discover

(expiration d a te )
—

—

—

Thank you for your order!

—

Authorizing signature

U.S. Department of Labor
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Free from BLS, to keep you informed
The Bureau’s series of issues papers provides you with succinct, up-to-the-minute background data in a readily digestible form.
They’re convenient, current, easy to read, and available free from BLS. To be added to the Issues in Labor Statistics mailing list
(No. J336), write to: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Publications and Special Studies, Room 2850, 2 Massachusetts Ave.,
NE., Washington, DC 20212-0001, or fax the coupon below to (202) 691-7890.
Issues in Labor Statistics also are available in PDF format on the BLS Web site: h ttp ://w w w .b ls .g o v /o p u b /ils /o p b ils h m .h tm
H ere are so m e re ce n t

2002
•
•
•
•
•
2001
•
•
•

Issues.

Twenty-first century moonlighters
Declining teen labor force participation
Consumer Spending Patterns Differ by
Region
Housing expenditures
Certification Can Count: The Case of Aircraft Mechanics
New and emerging occupations
Who was affected as the economy started to slow?
Characteristics and spending patterns of consumer units in the lowest 10 percent of the expenditure distribution

2000
•
•
•
•
•
•
1999
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1998
•
•
•

Unemployed Job Leavers: A Meaningful Gauge of Confidence in the Job Market?
Spending Patterns By Age
When one job is not enough
A comparison of the characteristics and spending patterns of Food Stamp recipients and nonrecipients
Labor Supply in a Tight Labor Market
Are Managers and Professionals Really Working More?
Occupational Stress
Expenditures on Public Transportation
Consumer Spending on Traveling for Pleasure
What the Nation Spends on Health Care: A Regional Comparison
What Women Earned in 1998
Computer Ownership Up Sharply in the
1990s
The Southeast is Maintaining Its Share of Textile Plant Employment
Auto Dealers are Fewer, Bigger, and Employ More Workers
Labor-Market Outcomes for City Dwellers and Suburbanites
Spending Patterns of High-income Households
New Occupations Emerging Across Industry Lines

Yes, please add my name to mailing list J336, Issues In Labor Statistics.
N am e__________________________________
Organization________________________________
Street


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

O b ta in in g in fo rm a tio n fro m th e B u re a u o f L a b o r S ta tis tic s

Office or Topic
Bureau o f Labor Statistics
Information services

Internet address
http://www.bls.gov
http://www.bls.gov/opub/

E-mail
blsdata_staff@ bls.gov

E m ploym ent and unem ploym ent

Employment, hours, and earnings:
National
State and local
Labor force statistics:
National
Local
Ul-covered employment, wages
Occupational employment
Mass layoffs
Longitudinal data

http://www.bls.gov/ces/
http://www.bls.gov/sae/

cesinfo@ bls.gov
data_sa@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/cps/
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
http://www.bls.gov/cew/
http://www.bls.gov/oes/
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
http://www.bls.gov/nls/

cpsinfo@ bls.gov
lausinfo@ bls.gov
cew info@ bls.gov
oesinfo@ bls.gov
m lsinfo@ bis.gov
nls_info@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/cpi/
http://www.bls.gov/ppi/
http://www.bls.gov/mxp/
http://www.bls.gov/cex/

cpi_info@ bls.gov
ppi-info@ bls.gov
mxpinfo@bls.gov
cexinfo@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/ncs/
http://www.bls.gov/ebs/
http://www.bls.gov/ect/
http://www.bls.gov/ncs/
http://www.bls.gov/iif/
http://stats.bls.gov/iif/
http://www.bls.gov/cba/

ocltinfo@ bls.gov
ocltinfo@ bls.gov
ocltinfo@ bls.gov
ocltinfo@ bls.gov
oshstaff@ bls.gov
cfoistaff@ bls.gov
cbainfo@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/
http: // www. bis .g ov/mfp/

dprweb@ bls.gov
dipsw eb@ bls.gov
dprweb@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/emp/
http://www.bls.gov/oco/

oohinfo@ bls.gov
oohinfo@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/fls/

flshelp@ bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/ro4/
http://www.bls.gov/rol/
http://www.bls.gov/ro5/
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/
http:// w w w.bls .gov/ro7/
http:// ww w.bls .gov/ro2/
http://www.bls.gov/ro3/
http://www.bls.gov/ro9/

BLSinfoAtlanta@bls.gov
BLS infoBoston@ bis .gov
BLSinfoChicago@bls.gov
BLSinfoDallas@bls.gov
BLS infoKansasCity@ bis .gov
BLSinfoNY@bls.gov
BLSinfoPhiladelphia@bls.gov
BLS infoSF@bls .gov

P rices an d livin g co n d itio n s

Consumer price indexes
Producer price indexes)
Import and export price indexes
Consumer expenditures
C om p en sation and w ork in g con d ition s

National Compensation Survey:
Em ployee benefits
Employment cost trends
Occupational compensation
Occupational illnesses, injuries
Fatal occupational injuries
Collective bargaining
Productivity

Labor
Industry
Multifactor
P ro jectio n s

Employment
Occupation
International
R eg io n a l cen ters

Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Dallas
Kansas City
New York
Philadelphia
San Francisco
O th er F ed era l sta tistica l a g e n c ie s


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

http://www.fedstats.gov/

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Postal Square Building, Rm. 2850
2 Massachusetts Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20212-0001
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300
Address Service Requested


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Periodicals
Postage and Fees Paid
U.S. Department of Labor
USPS 987-800