Full text of Monthly Labor Review : August 1966, Vol. 89, No. 8
The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Monthly Labor Review AUGUST 1966 VOL. 89 KALAMAZOO SEP 23 1966 ! ID I ku* ’ 'J f\ m / ini'i è NO. Health Insurance for Laid-Off Workers Union Referendum Elections The ILO Conference Collective Negotiations for Teachers UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR W . WILLARD WlRTZ, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS A rth u r M. R oss , Commissioner of Labor Statistics R o bert J. M y e r s , Deputy Commissioner Regional Offices and Directors NEW ENGLAND REGION W endell D. M acdonald 1603-A Federal Building Government Center Boston, Mass. 02203 Phone: 223-6727 (Area Code 617) Connecticut New Hampshire Maine Rhode Island Massachusetts Vermont N O RTH CENTRAL REGION Adolph 0. B erger 219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, 111. 60604 Phone: 353-7226 (Area Code 312) Illinois Missouri Indiana Nebraska Iowa North Dakota Kansas South Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin M ID D LE ATLANTIC REGION H erbert B ienstock 341 Ninth Avenue New York, N.Y. 10001 Phone: 971-5401 (Area Code 212) Delaware New York Maryland Pennsylvania New Jersey District of Columbia EAST CEN TRA L REGION J ohn W. L ehman 1365 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Phone: 241-7166 (Area Code 216) Kentucky Ohio Michigan West Virginia SOUTHERN REGION B runswick A. Bagdon 1371 Peachtree Street NE. Atlanta, Ga. 30309 Phone: 526-5416 (Area Code 404) Alabama North Carolina Arkansas Oklahoma Florida South Carolina Georgia Tennessee Louisiana Texas Virginia Mississippi W ESTERN REGION M ax D. K ossoris 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36017 San Francisco, Calif. 94102 Phone: 556-3178 (Area Code 415) Alaska Nevada Arizona New Mexico California Oregon Colorado Utah Hawaii Washington Idaho Wyoming Montana The M o n th ly Labor R eview is for sale by the regional offices listed above and by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 29402. Subscription price per year— $7.50 domestic; $9.00 foreign. Price 75 cents a copy. Correspondence regarding subscriptions should be addressed to the Superintend ent of Documents. Communications on editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief, M o n th l y Labor Review, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C. 20212. Phone 961-2327 (Area code 202). Use of fu nds for printin g this publication approved by the D irector of the B u rea u of the B udget ( October SI, 1 9 6 2 ). https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Monthly Labor Review UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR • BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS L aw rence R. K l e in , E ditor-in-C hief CONTENTS Special Articles 841 847 851 856 860 The International Labor Conference of 1966 A Summer School Short Course in Teacher Negotiations Health Insurance Coverage for Workers on Layoff Referendum Elections of National Union Officers Out-of-School Youth—Two Years Later Summaries of Studies and Reports 867 871 877 881 Labor and the Spanish Syndical System Wage Developments in Manufacturing Retail Trade—II, Wages and Hours, 1962 and 1965 Wages in Paint, Candy, and Southern Sawmill Industries Technical Note 887 Seasonally Adjusted CPI Components Departments ii hi 880 890 892 895 896 904 912 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis This Issue in Brief The Labor Month in Review Erratum Foreign Labor Briefs Significant Decisions in Labor Cases Chronology of Recent Labor Events Developments in Industrial Relations Book Reviews and Notes Current Labor Statistics August 1966 • Voi. 89 • No. 8 This Issue in B rief. . . w o r k e r who loses his job or is put on extended layoff may also lose his group health insurance coverage. This fringe detriment affects a large number of workers: probably not more than a tenth of employed workers who have such in s u r a n c e w o u ld r e ta in c o v e ra g e in th e e v e n t of extended layoff. The extension of coverage to layoff periods has increased significantly in recent years, according to Walter W. Kolodrubetz, although it has not usually been a major union goal. In Health Insurance Coverage for Workers on Layoff (p. 851), he examines the limited data available on the prevalence, the effectiveness, and the cost of continuing benefits during layoff periods. T he r e f e r e n d u m pro ced u re for electing national union officers has been declining in use in recent years. Of the 74 national union constitutions studied by the Office of Labor-Management Policy Development, only 17 now provide for election by this method. In Referendum Elections of National Union Officers (p. 856), Donnie L. Everette de scribes referendum provisions found in these 17 constitutions. The referendum process, he points out, necessarily requires a greater amount of time (and, usually, money) than does an election by convention delegates. T he Following are some recent key statistics from continuing B L S series. See Cur rent Labor Statistics, pp. 912-952. July Total civilian labor force (in thousands)____________________ Employment____________ Unemployment____________________________________ Unemployment rate (seasonally adjusted)(percent)___________ Earnings of production workers in manufacturing (preliminary) : Average hourly earnings_______________________ _____ Average weekly hours_______________________________ Average overtime hours____ __________________________ 1966 1965 79,636 78,457 76,411 74,854 3,225 3,602 3.9 4. 5 $2.70 $2.61 41.2 41.0 3.7 3.4 June of selected items in the Consumer Price Index to eliminate the effects of seasonal patterns of price change provides an economic tool particularly important in periods of rapidly changing prices. In a Technical Note on Season ally Adjusted CPI Components (p. 887), Harriet J. Harper and Carlyle P. Stallings describe the methods used to derive these indexes. A d ju s t m e n t Two yea rs after a sampling of out-of-school youth were surveyed in February 1963, followup inter views showed that about one-fifth of these young men had undertaken some formal job training, most of it in special schools or in company train ing programs. The second survey is reported by Vera G. Perrella and Elizabeth Waldman in Outof-School Youth—Two Years Later (p. 860). They found that all but 5 percent of the follow-up group were in the labor force. Unemployment rates for both graduates and dropouts were much lower than in 1963, but—as usual—the unemploy ment rate of the dropouts far exceeded that of the graduate. u https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Index of average hourly earnings of production workers in manu facturing (excluding overtime and interindustry shifts) (195769=100)___________________________________________ 124.7 120.8 Consumer Price Index (including single workers) (1957-59=100). 112.9 110.1 e a d l in e s on the “walkout” of the IT.S. worker delegation to the ILO conference tended to obscure the substantial accomplishments of this 50th in ternational meeting. H. M. Douty reports these accomplishments in The International Labor Con ference of 1966 (p .841). H h a t e v e r decisionmaking process is finally de veloped in the public schools, the school adminis tration will lose its right to make unilateral deci sions on wages and conditions of employment. This became apparent early in the sessions of a recent Institute on Collective Negotiations in Pub lic Education, at the University of Pennsylvania. In A Summer School Short Course in Teacher Ne gotiations, (p. 847), Georgena R. Potts discusses the Institute’s many-sided approach to the tech niques and ethics of the situation. W The Labor Month in Review Labor Disputes of Merging Newspapers h e n t h i s c e n t u r y b e g a n , there were 16 general circulation English-language newspapers in Man hattan ; now there are The Times, The News, the Post, and The World Journal, the latter a recent combination of three papers. W Profit and Loss. Losses estimated at $110 mil lion in the last 10 years induced the merger of three New York dailies. For nearly a year the publishers had discussed ways to cut their losses and begin to make money. Metropolitan dailies elsewhere have confronted the same set of economic facts and have reached a variety of resolutions. All compete for advertis ing with radio and television and with the growing and numerous profitable papers that serve the burgeoning suburban markets. Wages increase. Paper and other operating costs continue to rise. Consolidation of operations has been one for mula favored by those who have not outright gone out of business. In about 20 cities, two or more papers are published under a joint arrange ment for sharing facilities, costs, and profits. To test the legality of a plan whereby competing papers share advertising, circulation, and mechan ical operations, a Federal suit came to trial on April 5 in Tucson, where two papers have operated under a common business arrangement since 1940. The court has not yet announced its decision in the suit, which charged that the newspapers had an agreement for fixing of advertising and circula tion prices in violation of antitrust laws. Many publishers are diversifying into other media. About 15 percent of the cable TV stations are newspaper or publisher-affiliated. About 13 percent of the AM and FM radio stations and 29 percent of commercial TV stations are owned by newspapers or magazines. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis While the publishers have been introducing more efficient equipment to lower costs, some have had to resort, in addition, to mergers to make their operations profitable. One large shift occurred less than a year ago in San Francisco, when three dailies became two, and two Sundays one. On March 21, the publishers of The Herald Tribune, The World Telegram & Sun, and The Journal American announced their merger plan: Beginning April 25, The Herald Tribune would continue on weekday mornings; The Journal American and The World Telegram & Sun would produce one afternoon paper, The World Jour nal; the three would produce a single Sunday paper, The World Journal Tribune. The esti mated saving would be roughly $15 million a year. A combination of frazzled labor relations and eco nomics congealed into a strike against the new firm. Discordant Labor Relations. As a whole, indus trial relations in the newspaper industry have been characterized by self-discipline and restraint. But signs of serious erosion have been appearing with increasing frequency. In New York, as in other large cities, the chronic financial debility of the many metropolitan newspapers has abraded labor-management relations in recent years. In dustrial relations conflicts, complicated by the divided interests of the various publishers and by the fragmented union structure, have in turn en feebled the industry. The 1962-63 newspaper strike helped to push The Mirror into oblivion, and the 25-day walkout last fall hastened the current merger. Suggestions for improving relations were plen tiful after the two recent strikes, and joint labormanagement committees were founded to escape the stress of contract termination deadlines. However, interunion rivalries, whetted by tech nical change and mutual suspicion appear to have inhibited progress under this device. Nothing seems to have been capable of prevent ing the parties’ polarization of positions. In the latest dispute the Newspaper Guild rejected a last minute plea from Governor Nelson A. Rocke feller, Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Jacob Javits, and Mayor John V. Lindsay that the iii IV union send those members acceptable to manage ment to work on the new papers while a fact finding panel tried to work out at least a tempo rary settlement. Addressing himself to the other side, Mayor Lindsay received comfort just as chill: He sug gested that the three papers keep publishing under their accustomed mastheads until their union problems were ironed out, but the publishers notified the Mayor that their decision to end their separate existences on April 25 was “irrevocable.” The 1966 Strike. The crux of this dispute was the treatment of 4,540 union members on the three papers to be merged. Under the conditions of the merger proposed by the employers, almost half of the union members would lose their jobs. The Guild, which represents the business office employees in all three papers, as well as the edito rial department, struck on April 24, having chosen to work without a contract for a year so as to have a free hand in the event of a merger. The other nine unions had 11 months to go until their agree ments expired, but they held that such contracts could not automatically be transferred to the new corporation, and refused to work for the new firm. Maintaining the old contracts provided for merger and were therefore still valid, the publishers filed suit. The Guild, the hardest hit in terms of job losses, with 900 of 1,800 jobs gone, asked that dismissals be handled on the basis of seniority established under the previous contracts. The publishers sought exceptions to seniority that would permit them to put together the staff they wanted. The Guild also wanted 2 weeks of severance pay for each year of service for those whose jobs were abolished; under the previous contracts such pay was limited to a maximum of 60 weeks, except at The Tribune. Confronted by the strike, the publishers tried to settle first with the Printers, hoping that an agree ment with that union would open the way to agree ments with the other nine. In addition to a strategy that took account of the rivalry for first place among the unions, the publishers’ priority in attention was warranted by the hard fact that https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 400 of the 900 Printers were slated to lose their jobs. Settlements. Three weeks after the strike began the Printers reached agreement with The World Journal Tribune. The contract provided 8 weeks of severance pay—3 required under the previous contract plus 5 for a fund for unemployed mem bers. There was also a contribution to the pension and welfare fund and trade-off payments for re laxation of restrictions on automation. The new agreement expires March 30,1967; the cost was es timated by the union at $1.1 million—$913,000 more than required under the old contracts. In the ensuing weeks, the Paperhandlers, Stereo typers, Electricians, Mailers, Drivers, and Machin ists settled on much the same basis. A Guild settlement ratified early in July re tained about 1,000 jobs, almost all on the basis of seniority. There was no maximum on severance pay for those whose jobs were abolished or for the 400-odd employees who resigned voluntarily. By mid-August the Pressmen’s Union was the only one that had not settled with the new pub lishing firm. The major stumbling block was the union’s demand for a 614 -hour shift on Saturday night—a tour that is 8 hours at the New York Times and The Daily News. A Fragmented Future. Stating that the new firm had not called for a citywide shutdown, the Publishers Association abandoned its all-for-one policy during the strike, and The Times and The Daily News continued to publish, as did The Post which had dropped out of the Association in 1964. The Association and the unions have had a long history of multiemployer bargaining, although at times various publishers have made separate agree ments. However, on July 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a ruling of the National Labor Re lations Board that the Publishers’ Association must bargain individually with the Printers union. In the spring of 1964, the Printers had asked for individual negotiations, and upon being refused, had filed an unfair labor practice charge. Multi employer bargaining now appears to have been shot down from several directions as a mechanism for successful industrial relations. The International Labor Conference of 1966 H. M. D o u ty * e x c e p t i o n a l l y c l o s e c o n t e s t for the presi dency marked the opening of the 50th Session of the International Labor Conference, Geneva, June 1-23, at which 106 countries were represented. In addition to a vigorous debate on the Report of the Director-General of the International Labor Or ganization, the Conference acted upon a number of resolutions ; considered the application by mem ber States of ILO conventions and recommendadions, giving particular attention to labor inspec tion; and took either preliminary or final action on international instruments dealing with coop eratives, commercial fishermen, social security, grievance procedures, and labor-management com munications within the enterprise. The United States was represented at the Con ference by a strong tripartite delegation.1 How ever, its worker group, in protest against the outcome of the election for the presidency, re frained from participating in the activities of the Conference. This development is described be low. The U.S. Government and Employer dele gations, on the other hand, played an active role in the many facets of Conference work. An Officers of the Conference Two candidates were nominated for the presi dency: G. M. J. Veldkamp, Minister of Social Affairs and Public Health, The Netherlands, and Leon Chajn, Member of Parliament, Poland. Mr. Chajn’s name was advanced by a representative of the U.S.S.R. ; Mr. Veldkamp was nominated by one of the Government delegates from Ireland. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Of the 367 valid votes,2 cast by secret ballot, 184 were for Mr. Chajn and 183 for Mr. Veldkamp. Various factors—political, ideological, per sonal—influenced the outcome, and the result should not be taken to reflect an approximately even ideological division within the Conference. This was demonstrably not the case. For example, in seconding the nomination of Mr. Chajn, the Government delegate of Burundi, speaking on be half of the African Government group, empha sized that his action should not “be interpreted as alignment with any specific ideological bloc.” In the view of the Government delegate from Iran, who also made a seconding speech, the election of Mr. Chajn would “lead to the growth of a spirit of peaceful coexistence between countries with dif ferent economic systems.” Three vice presidents were elected unanimously: Roberto A. Billinghurst, Government delegate of Argentina; Felix Martinez-Espino, Employers’ delegate of Venezuela; and Mahmoud ben Ezzeddine, Workers’ delegate of Tunisia. Action of U.S. Workers’ Delegation Under the leadership of Rudolph Faupl, the U.S. Workers’ delegation, in protest against the election of Mr. Chajn, boycotted the Conference. This action reflected the deep-seated opposition of the American trade union movement to the ab sence of genuine tripartitism in communist (or fascist) countries, where autonomous organiza♦D irector of P ro g ram Developm ent, B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s. 1 M em bers of th e delegation w ere: G overnm ent: D elegates— George L. P. W eaver, A s sista n t S ecretary of L abor fo r In te rn a tio n al Affairs, and George P. Delaney, Special A s sista n t to th e S ecretary of S ta te an d C oordinator of In te rn a tio n a l L abor A ffairs ; S u b stitu te D elegate— Jo h n F . Skillm an, Special A s sista n t to th e S ecretary of Commerce ; C ongressional A dvisers— S enators G aylord Nelson and P a u l J. F an n in , an d R epresentatives D avid T. M artin, Adam C. Powell, Jr., F ra n k T hom pson, Jr., and W illiam H. A y re s ; A dvisers— T hom as D. Bowie, H a rry M. Douty, Jo h n T. F ish b u rn , Jo h n E. L aw yer, R obert J. M yers, N orm an O. Nilsen, M a rg aret P allansch, E d w ard B. P ersons, H ow ard R obin son, G ordon R oth, W illiam Steen, W alter S tolting, and W illiam Yoffee. E m ployers: D elegate— E dw in P. N eilan, C hairm an of th e B oard and P re sid en t, B ank of D elaw are ; A dvisers— R ichard Anton, H ow ard Jensen, R obert S. Lane, T hom as A. N orris, George J. P an to s, an d C harles H. Sm ith, J r . W orkers: D elegate— R udolph F aupl, In te rn a tio n a l R epresentative, In te rn a tio n a l As sociation of M achinists an d Aerospace W o rk e rs ; A dvisers— W alter J. Bierw agen, M atthew G uinan, E d w ard J. Hickey, Jr., D ale E. Reed, B e rtram Seidm an, an d A ustin P . Skinner. 2 T here were, in addition, 3 spoiled ballots and 6 ab sten tio n s. 841 842 tions of workers and employers do not exist. In the U.S. Workers’ view, the absence of free trade union movements in communist countries made the outcome of the election peculiarly inappropriate. Mr. Faupl’s action was upheld by President Meany of the AFL-CIO. There were prompt repercussions within the AFL-CIO. On June 9, Walter P. Reuther, presi dent of the United Automobile Workers, sent a strongly worded letter of protest on the boycott to President Meany. As a result, a special meeting of the AFL-CIO Executive Council was held on June 16 to consider the issue. After a vigorous debate, the following resolution was passed by a vote of 18 to 6: The AFL-CIO Executive Council fully supports and endorses the position of the President of the AFL-CIO and the recent action of the United States Workers’ Delegate to the International Labor Conference and his advisers. Through their demonstration of protest—which was not a withdrawal from the ILO—they used the most effective means available to indicate the reaction of the free workers of America to the election as President of the Conference of a representative of a totalitarian regime whose record and practices are a standing denial of every thing that the International Labor Organization stands for and was created to achieve. The resolution emphasizes the fact that the boy cott does not constitute a withdrawal from the ILO. Withdrawal would represent a major pol icy decision for the trade union movement. In fact, Mr. Faupl was reelected for a 3-year term to the Governing Body of the ILO, which meets four times a year, and attended the meeting that followed the conclusion of the Conference. Director-General’s Report The ILO Director-General, David A. Morse, presented the Conference with a report on many of the critical aspects of industrialization and labor policy.3 His report was aimed at the de veloping countries, and wTas marked by a strong sense of realism. It points out that “the road to industrialization is a long and arduous one” and that “immense obstacles and difficulties have yet to be overcome before a dynamic, self-sustaining modern industrial sector can become firmly rooted in the economies and societies of the developing countries.” https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 The report begins with a general discussion of the role of industrialization in economic growth, of recent rates of growth in various parts of the underdeveloped world, and of the social changes associated with the rise of industrial enterprise. A long chapter is devoted to human resources policy, including supply problems of nonsupervisory workers with the disciplines and skills required for sustained industrial growth, and of professional, technical, and managerial personnel as well. Consideration is then given to a variety of questions, such as wage policy, hours of work, and labor relations, that must be given practical application within the general framework of de velopment policy. Finally, the nature of the ILO’s contribution to the solution of labor problems in developing countries is discussed. More than 200 speakers participated in the de bate on the Director-General’s report. Although by no means all of the comment was relevant to the subject of the report, students of industrial development will find much of interest in the dis cussion. For the U.S. Government, George L-P Weaver pointed to the extensive postwar efforts by the United States to promote economic and social progress in Europe and in the underdeveloped world. He then observed that this country “can never do more than supplement the efforts of the developing countries themselves. They must sup ply most of the capital, the know-how, and, most important, the will to progress. If they do, we can and will continue to help, but if they do not, nothing that we or anyone else can supply will substitute for this determination of their own—the will to progress.” Edwun P. Neilan, for the U.S. Employers, pointed out that “agricultural devel opment is basic to industrialization, which can never grow and expand on the empty bellies of semi-starved workers.” Citing the Director-Gen eral’s report, he showed that “free market econo mies have achieved the highest degree of success in improving industrial output.” 3 R eport of th e D irector-G eneral to th e 50th Session of th e In te rn a tio n a l L abor Conference, Geneva, 1066, P a r t I : I n d u stria liza tio n and Lahor (Geneva, In te rn a tio n a l L abor Office, 1966). P a r t I I of th e D irector-G eneral’s R eport, en titled A c tiv ities of th e IL O , 1965, should be consulted by those who w ant a detailed account of th e fa r-ra n g in g c u rre n t a c tiv itie s of th e o rganization, an d a sense of th e d irections tow ard w hich its program s are evolving. 843 THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR CONFERENCE OF 1966 Resolutions The Resolutions Committee, consisting of 129 members, had before it 10 resolutions for con sideration.4 Unlike the situation in some prior years, none of the resolutions was markedly politi cal in content. The Committee unanimously adopted six of the proposed resolutions, as revised on the basis of extensive discussion within the Committee. These resolutions were subsequently adopted by the Conference. F our resolutions, for which time did not permit proper examination, were withdrawn. Major attention was given to the resolution on the role of the ILO in the industrialization of de veloping countries. In addition to giving strong support to the maintenance and expansion of ILO programs of vocational training in such countries, the resolution urges that member States be con sulted on work programs which they consider ap propriate for the ILO to undertake in coopera tion and coordination with the United Nations Organization for Industrial Development, and that plans for action resulting from such consulta tion be reported to the 51st Session of the Con ference (1967). The resolution specifies four broad areas to which particular attention should be given in terms of ILO activity. The Conference also adopted a resolution, intro duced by the U.S. Government delegates, on the importance of strong labor departments in terms of economic and social development, and another, sponsored by the United States and the United Kingdom, on the question of special youth train ing and employment programs. Other resolutions dealt with the development of human resources ; the contribution of the ILO to the International Human Rights Year in 1968; and the question of workers’ participation in decisionmaking within undertakings. This latter resolution invites the Governing Body of the ILO to request the Director-General to undertake a study of methods 4 A ctually, 11 reso lu tio n s w ere subm itted, b u t 2 of these, each re la tin g to th e in d u stria liz a tio n of developing countries, were consolidated. 5 F in a l action on an in te rn a tio n a l in stru m en t, w h eth er a Con vention or a Recom m endation, is< typically tak en only a fte r the sub ject is discussed a t tw o conferences. O ccasionally, final action is tak en , as w as th e case w ith one item on th e agenda fo r the 50th Session, a fte r th e m a tte r h as been considered by a p re p a ra to ry tech n ical conference. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis currently used throughout the world “to enable workers to participate in decisions within the un dertakings;” to consider holding seminars on this question; and to consider placing the question on the agenda of a future session of the Conference. Technical Committees The basic work of the ILO consists in the de velopment, after intensive exploration, of interna tional instruments for the protection and advance ment of working and living standards. These instruments may take the form of Conventions or Recommendations. A Convention, when ratified by a member State, imposes a binding treaty obli gation and may require the enactment of imple menting legislation. A Recommendation, as the term suggests, is intended to provide a guide to Governments, and to employer and worker orga nizations, in the development of standards in the subject-matter area concerned. The 50th Session of the Conference had four substantive items on its agenda. These are dis cussed briefly belowT. Cooperatives. The role of cooperatives in the economic and social growth of developing coun tries was before the Conference for a second dis cussion.5 The Committee on Cooperatives, con sisting of 142 members, held 13 sittings, and also established a working party to expedite its de liberations. There appeared to be no basic dis agreement within the tripartite committee on the potentially important role that cooperatives of all types could play in the process of economic de velopment. Many amendments were considered, however, to the text of the proposed Recommenda tion on the subject. The Recommendation, as it emerged from the Committee, is a comprehensive statement of policy objectives in the promotion of cooperative enter prises, methods of implementing policy through legislation, education, and training; financial and administrative aid in the development of coopera tives; appropriate supervision of cooperative en terprises by competent public authorities or co operative federations; and the desirability and na ture of international collaboration in promoting the growth of cooperatives. An Annex to the Recommendation provides examples of the role 844 that various forms of cooperatives may play in improving economic conditions in developing countries. The Conference adopted the Recommendation by 317 votes to 0, with 6 abstentions. Commercial Fishermen. The Committee on Fishermen, consisting of 65 members, had before it proposed texts of three international instru ments developed by a Preparatory Technical Con ference on Fishermen’s Questions, Geneva, Octo ber 1965. A Convention was proposed on the question of accommodation on board fishing ves sels ; a Recommendation on the training of fisher men; and a Convention concerning fishermen’s certificates of competency. As it emerged from the Committee, which held 18 sittings, the Convention on accommodation (applying to vessels of 75 tons or more or, alter natively, to vessels of 80 feet or more in length) contained highly detailed provisions relating to crew accommodations that cannot be adequately summarized in a brief article. The Recommenda tion on vocational training for fishermen was simi larly detailed, and dealt with training programs, standards, methods, financing, and international collaboration in the promotion of training. The Convention on certificates of competency related to standards of qualification for skippers, mates, or engineers employed on vessels of 25 gross tons or more engaged in salt water fishing.6 It included provisions on minimum age, professional experi ence, technical examinations, and the operation of an efficient inspection system to ensure observance of the competency requirements. The Conference adopted the Convention on ac commodation by 303 votes to 0, with 16 abstentions. The Recommendation on vocational training was adopted by 330 votes to 0, with 6 abstentions. The vote on the Convention on certificates of compe tency was 284 to 0, with 14 abstentions. The U.S. Government and Employer delegates abstained on the votes on the two Conventions. In the case of accommodation, the standards proposed would have created difficulties at the present time in the design and construction of certain American fish ing vessels. The Convention on certificates of competency would have been difficult to apply on a reasonable basis in view of the great variation in American fishing craft and operation. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 Social Security. The Committee on Social Se curity was established to consider revision of Con ventions Nos. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 concerning old-age, invalidity and survivors’ pensions, which had been adopted prior to World War II.7 Two meetings of a Committee of Experts on Social Se curity (1959 and 1962) had recommended revision of the social security Conventions to the GoverningBody, and had also expressed detailed views con cerning the standards to be incorporated in the new instrument (or instruments). I t had sug gested that particular account be taken of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Conven tion (1952) and of recent trends in national social security provisions. The Committee on Social Security consisted of 138 members. Despite the fact that this was a first discussion, the Committee held no less than 20 sittings. The subject matter was highly tech nical and of great importance to countries through out the world. The Committee decided to propose a Convention supplemented by a Recommenda tion. The Convention, in brief, provides that member States may accept international social security obligations separately for invalidity, oldage, and survivors’ pensions, and for agricultural and nonagricultural sectors of employment. It defines the persons to be protected by social se curity arrangements, the contingencies covered, qualifying conditions, benefit standards, and the conditions under which benefits may be suspended. It deals, finally, with legal, administrative, and financial safeguards to social security systems. The accompanying Recommendation, in general, covers additional aspects of social security protec tion that member States may want to incorporate into their legislation. The U.S. Government representative on the Committee, when the subject came before the Con ference, offered his congratulations on “the tre mendous task [the Committee] has performed at this Conference.” He observed, however, that “the new Convention should not contain some of the worthy but less important details that have pre vented many countries.with advanced systems from 8 E xcluded, in a d d itio n to sh ip s of less th a n 25 gross tons, w ere boats engaged in w haling, sp o rt fishing, or fishery research or protection. 7 The first stage in th e revision of ILO social secu rity in s tr u m ents w as th e adoption by th e C onference of th e E m ploym ent In ju ry B enefits C onvention a t its 4 8 th Session in 1964. 845 THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR CONFERENCE OF 1966 ratifying previous social security Conventions.” The TJ.S. Employer representative expressed op position to the draft instruments on a number of grounds, including the economic feasibility, except perhaps for the most advanced countries, of the coverage and benefit standards proposed. After adopting the report of the Committee, the Con ference approved the proposed Convention by 242 votes to 0, with 47 abstentions, and the proposed Recommendation by 253 votes to 37, with 11 abstentions. A resolution to place the question on the agenda of the next session of the Conference for a second discussion was approved unanimously. Grievances and Communications. The Commit tee on Grievances and Communications was the largest in the Conference, consisting of 158 mem bers. The Committee held 15 sittings for a first discussion of two separate but related subjects: (1) grievance procedures and (2) labor-manage ment communications within the enterprise. Each of these subjects is of vital interest to labor and management. The Committee adopted two instruments, each in the form of a draft Recommendation. The first related to grievance procedures. Grievances were defined as disputes over existing terms and conditions of employment, Claims for general changes in wages, benefits, or working conditions, are not included within the scope of the draft instrument. In broad summary, the proposed Recommendation on this subject asserts the right of any worker to submit a grievance without prejudice, to have his grievance examined through an appropriate mechanism within the undertaking, and to be assisted by his trade union or other (e.g., works’ council) representative. If all efforts at settlement within the undertaking fail, the pos sibility should exist for final settlement of the grievance through such means as voluntary arbi tration, conciliation or arbitration by the com petent public authorities, or the decision of a labor court or other judicial body. The proposed Recommendation on communica tions within the enterprise points to the great importance, partly in terms of minimizing griev ances, of good labor-management communications on all matters affecting the welfare of workers, and of the need to associate workers’ representatives with the development of communications policy and procedure. Rather detailed guidelines are https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis suggested on the elements of communications policy, and on the subjects on which information should be provided. The Conference adopted the Committee’s report and the proposed Recommendations with one re corded abstention. The resolution to place the two questions on the agenda of the next session of the Conference for a second discussion was adopted by 283 votes to 0, with 1 abstention. Application of ILO Instruments A most important aspect of the work of the ILO involves continuous review of the effect given by member States to Conventions 8 and Recom mendations. Machinery for this purpose was first established 40 years ago, and has subsequently been modified as need developed. Detailed exami nation of reports from member States is now made by a Committee of Experts, which also undertakes special studies. A committee is set up at each annual Conference to consider the report of these experts on the effect given to ILO instruments. At the 50th Session, the Committee on the Ap plication of Conventions and Recommendations, consisting of 101 members, held 17 sittings. The Committee devoted a considerable part of its dis cussion to a special study of the Committee of Experts on a Convention and two Recommenda tions (1927) relating to labor inspection. The study by the experts covered the application of these instruments in 102 member States and 36 nonmetropolitan territories. The Committee ex pressed particular concern that the instruments did not cover agriculture, and urged that the question of labor inspection in agriculture be placed on the agenda of an early session of the Conference. Among other matters, the Committee considered the functions of labor inspection services, prob lems of staffing and budgetary support, and the question of the extent to which workers’ or ganizations should be associated with inspection activities. The Committee examined various other ques tions and problems relating to the application of ILO instruments. There was a particularly de tailed discussion of the application of the Aboli tion of Forced Labor Convention (1957) in the 8 M ore th a n 120 C onventions have been adopted by th e ILO and alm ost 3,200 ratificatio n s have been recorded. 846 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 African territories of Portugal. An ILO Com mission of Inquiry had presented a report on this matter in early 1962, containing recommendations for changes in Portuguese legislation and practice. The Committee of Experts was requested by the Governing Body to make a special examination at its 1966 session of the information supplied by the Portuguese Government on this matter. On the grounds that this report was inconclusive, and in view of the fact that a majority of the Committee on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations was unwilling, in effect, to cen sure Portugal, the African members of the Com mittee withdrew until the discussion of Portugal was concluded. There was also a withdrawal of some delegations (African and other) when the Committee’s re port came before the Conference for discussion. The United States delegation did not withdraw. George L -P Weaver, speaking for the U.S. Gov ernment, disavowed any support whatever for colonialism, but observed that “we do consider the Committee on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations of such importance to the life of this Organization that the integrity, the procedures, the law and practice of this Committee demand and are worthy of the support of this Conference upon the completion of its work.” In the absence of a quorum, the conference took note of the Committee’s report. [As the] result of a new load-line agreement signed in London early this month by 60 maritime nations, . . . . the Plimsoll mark will be raised by 10 to 20 percent on tankers, ore carriers, and bulk carriers of more than 328 feet. Ships that carry dry cargo also will benefit by an increase of about 10 percent, if they are fitted with watertight hatch covers. . . . The Plimsoll mark or line is named for Samuel Plimsoll, an Englishman who was bom in 1824 and died in 1898. Plimsoll was a reformer with a great interest in the welfare of sailors. He was especially concerned with the loss of crewmembers’ lives on ships sunk at sea as a result of overloading, a practice which many British shipowners persisted in because if their vessels were lost at sea they profited handsomely from the insurance. As a member of Parliament from Derby from 1868 to 1880, Plimsoll fought vigorously and successfully for the enactment of a law limiting the loading of ships. As a result a loadline was required to be marked on the hulls of all British vessels showing the depth to which the law allowed them to be submerged through loading. Other maritime nations followed suit and the Plimsoll mark became international law. Plimsoll, incidentally, was the author of a book entitled “Our Seamen,” published in England in 1872. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — S e a fa re rs Log, April 15, 1966. A Summer School Short Course in Teacher Negotiations G eorgena R. P o tts * T a c t i c s a n d t h e o r y came together at the Na tional Institute on Collective Negotiation in Public Education, held at the University of Pennsylvania June 19-24, 1966.1 Collective negotiation is an amalgam of the National Education Association’s term, “professional negotiation,” and the more usual trade union phrase, “collective bargaining.” Whatever the semantic differences, the term was used throughout the Institute to describe a partici pative method of arriving at decisions on condi tions of employment. At its root is the palpable loss to the administrator of the right to make unilateral decisions in the negotiable areas. The labor relations practitioners in the sessionprofessional unionists and teacher representatives, negotiators, arbitrators, and grievance special ists—concentrated their discussion on the tools and devices of collective negotiation. Listening in tently were school superintendents, principals, and board members, some of them dragged reluctantly into collective bargaining, others approaching it willingly but warily, uncertain of its meaning and its machinery. The Institute was more than a workshop in the techniques of collective negotiation, however. Speaker after speaker called for appraisal of the effect of collective negotiation on the educational system and on the individuals within that system. The need for a change in the educational curricu lum was declared repeatedly. As the week went on, there was growing accept ance of the proposition that there could be no meaningful collective negotiation in public em ployment without the right to strike. At this point, the philosophic argument began to appear. There were those who accepted the “inevitability” https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis of collective bargaining in public education— however reluctantly—and took it as axiom that collective bargaining could not exist without the right to strike. There were others who believed that education does not have to recapitulate the stages of private industry. Legal Aspects Professor Lee O. Garber of the Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, sum marized the legal principles based on court rul ings in the field: In the absence of any statute on the subject, it appears that a board may engage in collective bargaining. But membership in profes sional associations or unions does not give teachers the right to demand that the board do so, particu larly where such demands are coupled with the threat to strike. School districts are generally considered quasi municipal, involuntary corporations. Their pow ers are very limited; they consist only of those expressly stated by law or those necessary to carry out expressly stated duties. Lacking specific authorization or prohibition, a school board is generally the sole judge of what it shall do (so long as it does not violate statutory law), and the legality of its action can be determined only by litigation. Exclusive Recognition Most union and association representatives, and most of the schoolmen who had become experi enced in collective negotiation, agreed that exclu sive recognition is the more workable system. (Under this type of agreement, the school board cannot negotiate with any other organization or with any individual teacher.) Exclusive recogni tion encourages stability in the relationship be tween the administrator and the organization. It has the added advantage that conflicts between different groups within the union are resolved by the organization itself before it comes to the bar gaining table; the school board is thus relieved of some of the pressure of assigning priorities to the many competing voices. *Of th e Office of P u b licatio n s, B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s. 1 The I n s titu te w as sponsored by P h i D elta K ap p a and the U niversity of P en n sy lv a n ia’s G rad u ate School of E d u catio n and W h arto n School of F in an ce an d Commerce. 847 848 School districts sometimes prefer to operate under what they consider the more democratic methods of joint or proportional representation, and some of the new State laws are expressly designed for these systems.2 Most of the national organizations have stated that they favor exclusive recognition. In practice, however, a local affiliate will often deviate from the stated policy, choosing that kind of arrangement which gives it the advantage in the particular situation.3 To some extent, the choice depends on the unit definition. Exclusive recognition does not neces sarily mean that a school administration will have only one adversary in bargaining, since it is pos sible to have several different negotiating units within a system, each with exclusive recognition. For example, different units may be established for custodial workers, for bus drivers, for cafeteria workers, as well as for classroom teachers; or the classroom group may be divided into elementary and secondary teachers. Some of the recent State laws specify a State agency to make the unit determination; in some the statute actually prescribes the unit to be used. Determination by statute is cumbersome and inflexible, and may result in unrealistic units, in the view of Myron Lieberman, Director of Educa tional Research and Development, Rhode Island College. Much of this statutory determination, he predicted, will be modified by experience. The NEA holds that, generally speaking, all certificated personnel should be in a single unit, but that the determining factor should be “the desires of the professional personnel.” A 1964 policy statement by the Executive Committee of the American Federation of Teachers says the unit should include all certified personnel on the class room teacher salary guide. This leaves in doubt the status of administrators, ^principals, or non teaching personnel whose salaries are pegged to the teacher salary scale. Both policies thus suffer from some imprecision and ambiguity—perhaps intentional, since in this as in other respects local groups often go against national policy to seek a unit determination most advantageous to their own fortunes. Dr. Lieberman proposed three criteria to evalu ate unit determinations: effective teacher repre sentation ; effective school administration ; and stability in the school board-teacher relationship. The emerging pattern is to include all teachers in https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 196« the same unit. More troublesome questions arise over the inclusion in this unit of (a) nonprofes sional employees; (b) special professional groups, such as social workers or nurses; (c) all teachers regardless of grade level, subject, length of service, and tenure; and (d) principals, department heads, and supervisory teachers. This last category is probably the real thorn in determining the makeup of the negotiating unit. Edward B. Shils, Associate Professor of Indus try, University of Pennsylvania, and Consultant on Teacher Negotiations to the Philadelphia Board of Public Education, commented that from a personnel standpoint, the situation of all em ployees of a school district is much the same. Job evaluation, position description, induction and sep aration procedures, wage and salary administra tion, holiday and vacation pay, pension systems— all are necessary mechanisms for principals and teachers as well as for custodial and clerical staff. He observed, however, that many school boards find themselves dealing simultaneously with longexperienced unions who represent the service and clerical workers, and with comparative amateurs who make up the teacher negotiating corps. Ques tions then arise as to whether the board can vary its treatment of different types of employees de pending on the effectiveness of their representa tion, and whether the concessions made in one set tlement will set a precedent for dealing with other groups. Representation Election Organization membership is not a good criterion for selection of a bargaining representative, ac cording to Michael H. Moskow, Assistant Profes sor of Management at Drexel Institute of Tecli2 Collective n eg o tiatio n sta tu tes' have been enacted in eight S ta te s : C alifornia, C onnecticut, M assachusetts, M ichigan, Oregon, Rhode Island, W ashington, and W isconsin. In these eight S tates a re 25 p ercen t of th e N atio n ’s public school teachers. The law s v ary considerably. W isconsin w as th e only S ta te to establish a se p ara te agency specifically to ad m in ister its law, w hich covers all public employees (d u rin g th e In s titu te , Com m issioner Arvid Anderson discussed some of th e early decisionsi of th e W isconsin E m ploym ent R elations B o a rd ). In M assachusetts th e law is to be ad m in istered by th e S ta te L abor Com m issioner, in M ichigan by th e S ta te B oard of M ediation, and in Rhode Islan d by the S ta te L abor R e la tio n s B oard. The C onnecticut law v ests th e S ta te B oard of E d u catio n w ith a u th o rity lim ited to the im passe procedure (m ediation and advisory a r b itra tio n ) . None of the th re e Pacific C oast S ta te s provided any agency fo r a d m in istra tion of th e ir new law s. 3 See “R e p resen tatio n Among T each ers,” M o n th ly Labor R e v ie w , Ju ly 1966, pp. 72S-732. COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS FOR TEACHERS nology. Membership in an organization may be for reasons other than representation, and dual membership—in a union and in a professional or ganization—is not uncommon. A secret ballot election has seme disadvantages—notably the bit terness that may linger from a closely fought cam paign—but overall it appears to be the best way of insuring that teachers choose the representative they want. A frequent point of argument is the location of the polling place. The NEA generally favors vot ing in each school. The AFT generally favors a point outside the school, fearing an “ambiance of coercion” with in the school building. One of the more novel arrangements was worked out for the 1965 elections in Philadelphia, where voting was done in school buses. Negotiation Techniques To Albert Shanker, president of New York City’s United Federation of Teachers, power is the central factor in negotiation. Differing sharply from those who suggested that collective negotiation can exist as a sort of mutual and non partisan factfinding, the UFT president believes that factfinding moves to decision only because of the power in the situation. Reason prevails only when power is imminent. The task of the union leader, as Mr. Shanker sees it, is to create this power and direct it toward useful ends, then to be forced by that very power to achieve those ends. Most members, he has found, “would just as soon be let alone.” The union leader must convince them of the justice of their cause, and that they must fight to secure their rights. Through every possible device he must increase their involvement in the situation until he has built up their aspirations and hopes to a point where he cannot control the pressure of the membership; he has no choice but to come back with a satisfactory agreement. To maintain this pressure up to the point of set tlement, union demands must be kept high (“even unreasonable,” Mr. Shanker confessed), and all major items must be held for simultaneous settlement. The red meat of this traditionalist approach to negotiation appeared to shock some of the board members and administrators, to whom bargaining had so far been only a theoretical exercise. It also https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 849 brought a request from Herbert R. Northrup, Pro fessor and Chairman, Department of Industry, Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, that the group consider these questions: Is it consistent with professional ethics to participate in the tac tics of a union ? Is it consistent with professional ethics for an administration to lie to teachers—and to the public—by telling them there is no more money available (and then, after more pressure is applied, find that there is more money after all) ? Can professionalism be maintained in the face of these less desirable aspects of collective negotia tion? Agreeing with the UFT leader that it is the interplay of power that brings reason to decision making, Dr. Northrup observed that the institu tion of collective bargaining may not be viable absent the right to strike. Factfinding may have an arthritic effect, because, knowing that issues will go to a board, the parties are bound by com mon sense not to be prematurely reasonable. NEA negotiations advisor Donald Wollett agreed that factfinding and mediation are not catalytic forces. The requirement to mediate is not effective, he said, unless the parties have more anxiety and uncertainty about the result of media tion than about the result of two-party negotiation. Dr. Northrup cautioned that the seemingly ready transfer of private sector techniques into the public sector may not be based on any sound con sideration of its desirability, but rather on inertia and acceptance of outmoded shibboleths. Grievances The first year’s operation of a grievance system may be cluttered with a great many cases which re flect a teacher’s “subjective sensibilities” or a gen eral feeling of wrong and oppression, explained Ida Klaus, Director of Staff Relations for the New York City School System. A grievance system must be limited to those rights and benefits speci fied in the agreement. Especially in the early months of a grievance system, Miss Klaus said, formality of proceedings lends authenticity to the equity and seriousness of handling. Later, when both parties are more at ease within the system, hearings may develop along more informal lines. Advisory arbitration, or review by a third party at some point, is most useful, Miss Klaus suggested, if done at the level 850 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 just below the head of the agency. In this way, the administrator benefits from an outside look at the situation before he puts his reputation on the line by making the decision. Changing Roles Underlying much of the discussion on techniques and ethics was concern over the effect collective negotiation would have on key personnel in school administration : the principal, the superintendent, and the school board. If a principal is included as part of the manage ment team, teachers may come to regard him as “an adversary, or some kind of impediment to their collective will,” said Benjamin Epstein, prin cipal of Newark’s Wequahic High School. On the other hand, unless the expertise of the prin cipal is involved at some stage of the negotiation, the settlement may be unworkable. He foresees that more formality may develop in the relation ship between principal and teacher, as the pendu lum swings from administrative rule to collective decisionmaking. Teachers now courting freedom from capricious rulings by the administration may find that individuality and creativity in teaching is still more circumscribed by detailed written agreements. It is not only the role of the principal that is changing, according to C. Taylor Whittier, super intendent of the Philadelphia public schools. Whether one views the school as a reflection of society, or as the force that forms society, it is obvious that we are in a time of changing roles in both structures. For persons engaged in educa tion, change is not new, countered Fred M. Heddinger, vice president of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association; it is a way of life. Mr. Heddinger suggested that the education profession may have let itself become too involved in a fren zied drive toward participative decisionmaking within the school. He asked that teachers and administrators devote the same degree of energy and creative imagination to the advancing tech nology and its application to teaching; the grow ing involvement of the Federal Government at all levels of the education process; and, perhaps most significant, the prospect of large industrial com bines entering “both the hardware and software ends” of education, as indicated by the Office of Education’s recent announcement that it would now contract directly with private corporations. The implications for the public school, he said, of this involvement with profitmaking enterprises far outshadow the processes of decisionmaking. Good moral character, and a thorough knowledge of the common branches, formerly were considered as indispensable qualifications in an instructor. The instructors were chiefly selected from the most respectable families in town. But for 15 or 20 years, these things have not been so much regarded. They have indeed been deemed desirable; but the most common method now seems to be to ascertain, as near as possible, the dividend for that season from the public treasury, and then fix upon a teacher who will take charge of the school, 8 or 4 months, for this money. He must indeed be able to obtain a license from the Board of Visitors, but this has become nearly a matter of course, provided he can spell, read, and write. . . . Instructors have usually boarded in the families of the pupils. Their compensation has varied from 7 to 11 dollars a month for males; and from 62y2 cents to 1 dollar a week for females. Within the past 10 years, however, the price of instruction has rarely been less than 9 dollars in the former case, and 75 cents in the latter. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis —“A New England School of 1810,” in B a c k g r o u n d R e a d in g s in A m e r ic a n E d u c a tio n , selected and edited for use at The White House Conference on Education, July 1965. Health Insurance Coverage for Workers on Lavoff •> W a lter W. K olodrubetz * S in c e voluntary group health insurance plans are designed to protect employed workers and their families, coverage is usually terminated when a worker loses his job or is put on an extended lay off. Probably not more than a tenth of employed workers with such insurance, financed in whole or in part by their employers, would retain coverage in the event of an extended layoff; but even for them, the duration of extended benefits may not cover the entire layoff period. Such uncertainties surrounding health insurance protection add an other facet to worker fears of long layoffs or loss of job.1 There is usually little incentive for an employer to extend group health insurance to workers on layoff except when there is a reasonable expecta tion that the workers will be recalled in a short, time. There may also be a good reason for cau tion toward wdiat may turn out to be a costly step. Administrative convenience, on the other hand, en courages continuation for a short period, such as to the end of the month of layoff. Employers also respond to the social welfare considerations in herent in the practice. Although not usually a major union goal, the extension of coverage to layoff periods has in creased significantly in recent years, chiefly in re sponse to union concern with employment security. Significant changes in the duration and financing of the extended benefits have also been negotiated. Pressure for the introduction of extended bene fit coverage or improvement in such coverage is a function of the employment situation. As long as unemployment is at a low level, it is likely that https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis little action on this front can be expected from private plans, particularly since insurers have little incentive to promote such coverage. If the econ omy takes a reverse turn, however, interest may be expected to increase. Although comprehensive information on the direct cost of continuing benefits during layoff periods is not available, fragmentary data suggest that the increase in cost is relatively small in rela tion to the cost of the entire plan. The costs due to higher utilization and to adverse selection are even more difficult to ascertain, although existing evidence indicates that they are not prohibitively high. In the long run, the growth and improve ment of continuation provisions will depend, to some degree, on costs attributed to them. As the cost of medical care rises, more attention will be given by employers and insurers to potential costs involved in providing benefits during layoffs. On the other hand, the higher the cost of medical care the greater will be the workers’ and unions’ appre ciation and desire for the protection of continued coverage. Coverage Provisions extending benefits to layoff periods have been incorporated into many health insurance plans in recent years, mainly in collectively bar gained plans in manufacturing industries such as primary metals, transportation equipment, rubber products, food products, and electrical equipment. In addition, the operating and nonoperating rail road employees’ national plans have such provi sions. Extension is found chiefly in plans for production workers, although sometimes it is also offered to clerical employees. Estimates of group health insurance coverage by industry indicate *Of th e Office of W ages and In d u s tria l R elations, B ureau of L abor S tatistics. 1 In fo rm atio n upon w hich th is artic le is based w as obtained from a broader study of m anpow er-m obility im plications of the extension of h e a lth benefits to laid-off w orkers. As p a r t of th is study, B ureau rep re sen tativ es interview ed officials of m ajo r in surance com panies to assess an d ev alu ate th e practice. The views of unions, m anagem ent, and w orkers w ere obtained th ro u g h a series of case studies of m a n u fa c tu rin g p la n ts w hich extended coverage to laid-off w orkers an d w hich had a recent layoff. The study, specifically required by section 102(2) of th e M anpow er D evelopm ent an d T rain in g Act, w as undertaken by th e B ureau a t th e req u est of, and w ith fu n d s provided by th e D ep artm en t’s Office of M anpower, A utom ation, an d T rain in g (now the Office of M anpow er Policy, E v alu atio n , and R esearch). 851 852 that extended protection during layoff is guaran teed to no more than a tenth of the approximately 50 million workers covered by group health insur ance plans.2 The extended coverage is usually continued on the same basis as that for active employees, and under the same financing arrangements. Typi cally, it provides hospital, surgical, and medical care protection to the eligible worker and his de pendents for a specified period of time after layoff, usually 2 or 3 months. Exceptionally long periods of protection are provided in motor vehicle and farm equipment manufacturing industries, where the United Auto mobile Workers have negotiated plans tied to supplemental unemployment benefit (SUB) en titlement. They currently provide employerfinanced health insurance benefits to 1aid-off employees for a maximum of 13 months after the month in which the layoff began.3 Liberal pro visions are also found in the primary metals, rubber products, food products, and electrical machinery manufacturing industries. Effectiveness of Protection The number of laid-off workers covered by vol untary group health insurance at any given time is unknown. Neither commercial insurers nor Blue Cross-Blue Shield plans can provide perti nent data because their regular recordkeepingdoes not readily identify the workers on layoff. A few special studies, however, have yielded some information on the extent and nature of protec tion afforded. One study, made for a union,4 covered the ex perience of hundreds of companies (including basic steel and aluminum companies) that have contracts with the Steelworkers. The plans in question provided continuation of group hospital and surgical coverage for 6 months at company cost for employees with at least 2 years of service, and to the end of the month of layoff for those with less service. Life insurance was extended for all employees for up to 6 months at company expense, and for an additional 18 months at a cost to the employee of 60 cents per $1,000 of insurance. These companies reported that, in December 1963, 36,000 employees on layoff were covered by hos pital and surgical insurance and 51,000 had life https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 insurance coverage. The report indicated that a 6-month extension of health insurance coverage was not long enough to provide adequate protec tion. It concluded that “the difference between the numbers of laid-off employees covered for life insurance and for hospital and surgical benefits, as well as the general record of employment in the industry since 1960, show that many employees continued on layoff after their 6-month period [of continued] coverage has expired.” Another study, conducted by the University of Michigan, stressed the ineffectiveness of health coverage continuation and pointed out weaknesses in employer-employee communication regarding rights to convert to individual coverage. I t re vealed that most workers dropped coverage even when offered a chance to continue at group rates.5 Under the plan studied, health insurance coverage was continued for 2 months after layoff at no cost to the worker. The worker could continue cover age for as long as an additional 12 months by paying the group rate each month. Continued coverage after that period was available at indi vidual rates. A third of the workers did not con tinue coverage after the 2-month “free” period elapsed, and another fourth dropped coverage later. The remainder continued coverage, re turned to employment in the group, or joined other groups. 3 E xcludes brief extensions of coverage, such as to end of m onth of layoff and end of m onth follow ing m onth of layoff. The estim ate of 50 m illion w as derived from th e in fo rm atio n in A lfred M. Skolnik, “Ten Y ears of Em ployee-Benefit P la n s,” Social S ecu rity B u lletin , A pril 1966, p. 6. 3 Benefit coverage is continued fo r all em ployees fo r a m onth a fte r th e m onth in w hich th e layoff began. T h erea fter, em ployer-financed h e a lth benefits a re extended on th e baslis of 1 m o n th ’s benefits fo r each 4 w eeks of supplem ental unem ploym ent benefits to w hich th e employee is entitled . The em ployee m ay th en continue his h e a lth in su ran ce fo r 12 m onths beyond th e period of com pany financing by paying th e group ra te prem ium . 4 A Special R eport on Y our Union’s P rogram s of E m p lo ym en t and Incom e S ecu rity, T w elfth C o n stitu tio n al Convention, U nited S teelw orkers of Am erica, A tla n tic City, N .J., Septem ber 1964. 5 W alter J. M cNerney and stu d y staff, U n iv ersity of M ichigan, H o sp ita l and M edical Econom ics, vol. 2 (Chicago, H o sp ital R e search an d E d u catio n al T ru st, 1962), p. 1121. T he resu lts of th e U niversity of M ichigan stu d y a re borne o u t by lim ited d a ta obtained from case studies conducted by the B ureau. F o r exam ple, in one firm w here coverage a f te r layoff w as co n tin g en t upon the em ployee’s co n trib u tio n , the v a s t m a jo rity of w orkers lo st coverage because th ey did n ot m ake th e sm all paym ent required. Then, upon th e u n io n ’s request, th e firm agreed to d educt th e am o u n t from th e final paycheck of w orkers n o t specifically req u estin g th a t th e ir coverage be d is continued. Before in tro d u c tio n of th e new procedure, ap p ro x i m ately 3 o ut of 4 w orkers lo st or dropped coverage. A fter the change, ab o u t 3 o u t of 4 w orkers m ain tain ed coverage. HEALTH INSURANCE FOR LAID-OFF WORKERS Insurance Considerations The practice of continuing health insurance cov erage during periods of layoff has largely devel oped during the past 15 years. Although this growth can be attributed, in large part, to union efforts to protect workers during layoffs, it may also be traced to the general easing of underwrit ing rules for eligibility for group coverage by prepayment plans, such as Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and by commercial insurance carriers. Requirements for size of group, dependents’ cov erage, definition of group, age limits, and continu ation of coverage during retirement and unem ployment have undergone change stemming from a variety of social and economic pressures, espe cially collective bargaining. However, continua tion of group health insurance coverage during layoff involves participation in a group by per sons for whom an active employer-employee rela tionship—the heart of group insurance under writing—no longer exists. F or this reason, among others, the insurers have not been inclined to en courage lengthy periods of layoff coverage. Most commercial insurers now consider the ex tension of coverage for limited periods during tem porary layoffs as a feasible underwriting practice. Their reluctance; to extend such periods stems from the belief that claims experience during layoff is higher than during active employment because of “saved-up medical care” (especially elective sur gery) and adverse selection. The latter is espe cially important in plans requiring employee con tributions, because self-selection usually results in adverse selection. Thus, employees who anticipate they will have health care expenses for themselves or their dependents continue their coverage more often than those, who, because of better health, the absence of postponed surgery, and so forth, expect they will not have such expenses. However, de spite these reservations, major insurers have stand ard policy provisions for continuation of coverage 8 A ccording to in su ran ce com pany officials, th is lim ited con tin u a tio n m akes sense fo r several reasons. The tem p o rary layoff m ay n ecessitate, in absence of co n tin u atio n , burdensom e adm in is tra tiv e expenses of te rm in a tin g an d subsequently re in s ta tin g a w o rk er’s coverage in th e group plan. I f th e w orker has been co n trib u tin g to th e co st of coverage, i t would u su ally be neces sary to reim burse him if he is n ot covered u n til th e end of the m onth. F ro m th e public relatio n s view point, i t would also create a problem in d isc rim in atin g betw een w orkers laid off a t th e beginning of th e m onth and those laid off la te r in th e m onth. 224-966 0 - 6 6 - 2 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 853 to the end of the month following the month of layoff.6 At the employer’s request, these general limits may be, and often are, substantially liberalized. Cost. When laid-off workers are continued under group insurance plans, a direct cost to the employer obviously accrues. Since there is no outflow of workers from the group until their continuation of coverage ceases, additional premiums are in curred. Moreover, if the laid-off worker group, as mentioned above, is a high risk group owing to adverse selection and higher utilization, average premiums per covered worker may also increase. Comprehensive information on the direct costs of extending coverage during layoffs is not avail able. Fragmentary data suggest that, in the long run, the increased cost attributable to extension would be relatively small in relation to the cost of the entire group insurance plan. In one case brought to the attention of the Bureau, a major insurer reported that, during a 4-year period, the claims for workers on layoff accounted for less than 1 percent of the total claims each year. Under this plan, liberal group insurance benefits, financed by the employer, were continued for 3 months after layoff. Only 1 employer out of the 10 included in the Bureau’s case studies was in a position to estimate the increased cost owing to extended benefit provi sions. For this plan, group life and health insur ance was extended for 6 months at employer cost. According to the company, about 6 percent of the average premium cost of group insurance could be attributed to extended benefits, but this figure included coverage for workers on leave of absence, on sick leave, and absent from work for other reasons. Some idea of the direct cost involved when lay offs are especially prevalent can be derived from the already cited report to the 1964 convention of the Steelworkers. The union and the basic steel companies agreed in 1960 that the companies would be reimbursed for increases in the monthly cost of the group insurance program over a base figure ($20.16) per employee. The additional payment was to be met from the cost-of-living adjustment, which otherwise would have been payable in wage increases. According to the report, a total of 4.5 cents of the maximum 6 cents 854 of cost-of-living adjustment over the 3-year pe riod, marked by considerable layoffs in the steel industry, was retained by the companies as reim bursement for increases in insurance costs. The report stated, “A major factor in this increased cost was the new provision negotiated with the major basic steel companies in January 1960 to continue i n s u r a n c e coverage for laid-off employees.” 7 Utilization. Information on utilization rates (i.e., frequency of claims) for workers on layoff is not available, primarily because it is not col lected. One insurer said, on the basis of limited studies, that “while no one study can be conclusive, a pattern of increased claims costs seems to be characteristic of each one.” This comment would seem to summarize the attitude of insurance offi cials that, in general, utilization of medical care services—hospital, surgical, and medical benefits— is greater for workers on layoff than for those in active service. The intensive study by the University of Mich igan of the utilization rates of workers covered by health insurance during layoff supports this view. The summary of the report reads, in p a rt: “Admission rates, average lengths of stay, and utilization rates were markedly higher during the layoff period than during the year prior to layoff, or during comparable months in the prior year. This was especially true in the months following layoff, when group coverage and loss-of-income coverage, both prepaid, were still in effect. For example, the annual utilization rates during the layoff period ranged from 1.5 to 7.9 times those for comparable months in the previous year (for the same subscribers) depending upon the subgroup considered. Looking only at March 1958 (the month following the layoff), the utilization rates, depending upon the subgroup involved, were from 6 to 14 times those for the 1957 control period.” 8 Employer and Union Attitudes Although continuation of benefits during layoff has been usually initiated by the union, only rarely was the issue among the major union demands or employer offers during negotiations. Typically, according to union officials, the issue was brought to the bargaining table as part of a health insurance https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 package demand, with little attention being given to its effects and costs. On occasions when costs were discussed, the unions had very little informa tion and consequently minimized the costs. They recognized, of course, that an expense was involved, but as one union official put it, “We tell the com pany that there wouldn’t be any cost if they had no layoffs.” All of the union officials interviewed felt that benefit continuation served a very impor tant social welfare purpose in “protecting workers who can least afford to be hit by medical costs.” Since all of the plants studied had layoffs in the past year, the union officials seemed well informed about recent experience of the plans. They com mented that the maximum duration of coverage provided during layoff was negotiated in part on the basis of past layoff history and in part “pulled from the hat.” One official commented that “the practice [stemmed from] the seasonal nature of the business.” The officials said that this issue was not given too much attention during negotiation, un less a very long continuation period was involved. In most cases, the union felt that, in the light of past experience, the duration of coverage was ample. Extension periods of 2 or 3 months covered the typical situation. In programs with longer ex tension periods (e.g., 6 to 12 months), the union officials said that this was sufficient to cover any of their layoffs. However, this did not mean there was no room for improvement, since “who knows what can happen in the future.” Despite this, according to the officials interviewed, liberalization of the extension provision was not contemplated for the next negotiation. Interviews with management officials revealed mixed opinions as to the reasons for the develop ment of the extension practice. An official of one company indicated that extended benefits had been provided as early as the 1930’s because the com pany felt that “workers on layoff needed this pro tection as much as active workers.” He believed that employee benefits, such as insurance and pen sions, should be jointly financed so that workers would have a greater appreciation of company efforts to “help the workers help themselves.” As a result, the official said, a high proportion of workers would elect to join the plan, and a large number would continue membership after layoff. 7 U nited S teelw orkers of Am erica, op. cit., p. 11. 8 M cNerney, op. cit., pp. 1127-1128. HEALTH INSURANCE FOR LAID-OFF WORKERS This point was also expressed in another plant in which health benefits were financed by joint con tributions. In both instances, the company offi cials adm itted th at while the provisions for con tinuation of benefits were subject to negotiation, the offer to liberalize the provision was usually initiated by the company and was acceptable to the unions. Officials in both firms said there was a need for the provision since they did experience layoffs with some regularity because of business requirements. In the rem aining cases, the practice of continu ing benefits, according to company officials, origi nated with the union. The officials readily ad mitted th at the advent of a layoff, which in many cases was regularly enough to be expected by workers w ith low seniority, was something the workers should accept as a condition of employ ment. In one case, where benefits were continued for 2 months after employment, severe fluctuation in employment at frequent intervals was the nor mal outlook. The officials of this firm had a good idea of the cost of the extended benefit and were not too ready to consider its liberalization. A personnel m anager of a single plant firm with less than 1,000 workers indicated that, from the company’s viewpoint, there was little reason to continue benefits during layoff. B ut since it was p a rt of the union demand for a health and insur ance package, the company accepted the obligation, he said. Worker Attitudes Some insights into worker understanding of the value of extended coverage were revealed by p er sonal interviews. Despite a general lack of under standing of health insurance provisions and poli cies, most workers demonstrated an awareness of their benefits and an appreciation of their value. Reflecting the wide diversity in status of the work ers interviewed, the degree of understanding d if fered greatly among establishments and among workers in the, same establishment. Em ployer practices with regard to notifying workers of their health insurance benefit rights on layoff appeared to affect, at least in some measure, workers’ awareness of the value of extended cover age. In some cases, the employees were notified https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 855 by their immediate supervisor of their layoff and the steps to be taken. In others, form al exit inter views were conducted at which the details of rights and benefits were explained to each employee. Some companies called group meetings to explain layoff procedure and other details. Typical of the more form al procedures was the technique followed by one firm. A lthough there was no form al exit interview, workers were given a form explaining their rights and benefits at layoff. The company officials felt th a t workers were well informed as to their rights and benefits. Significantly, almost all workers (roughly 90 per cent in the last layoff) continued their contribu tion for group insurance during layoff, and almost all the workers affected (95 percent) returned to work when recalled. A nother type of communication on layoff was th at of a firm which did not conduct a personal interview with each worker affected, but did pro vide inform ation by a form notice at a group meet ing. In this case, the union was also active in relaying full inform ation to workers through meet ings and by mail. As one union official com mented, however, these meetings were not well attended. Typical of an inform al procedure was one where the working foreman delivered the “pink slip” and the laid-off workers were then left to their own devices. The only communication on benefit rights at layoff had been made when a worker was originally hired. As m ight be expected, worker knowledge of benefit coverage, as revealed by in terviews, was extremely poor. In general, management officials felt th a t the communication to employees of their rights upon layoff, as well as during their employment, was sufficient and th at most workers were well in formed. On the other hand, a surprisingly large number of workers interviewed had no idea of what their benefit rights were on layoff, even if they were aware of benefits available during em ployment. Typically, these were young workers with low seniority and little fam ily responsibility, and mostly engaged in relatively unskilled work. The lack of understanding and knowledge must be attributed in p a rt to the workers involved but, in many instances, management and unions did little to inform the workers. Referendum Elections of National Union Officers D o n n ie L. E v e r ette * T h e i n t e r e s t of the D epartm ent of Labor in na tional union elections stems not only from the De partm ent’s general interest in the labor movement, but also fro m its role in adm inistering th e L aborM anagement R eporting and Disclosure A ct of 1959. T itle IV of th a t act sets certain minimum standards for union officer elections, including provisions relating to campaign activities. The LM RD A states th at national union officers are to be elected at a convention of delegates chosen by secret ballot, or by a secret ballot among the mem bers. This article will concentrate on the latter method—the referendum. Looking at national union constitutions, how common is the referen dum? how is it conducted? how are nominations made? and how are the campaigns of the candi dates facilitated or restricted by the constitutions ? The basic source m aterials are the constitutions of all national unions having one or more local affiliates filing under the LM RD A and having 40,000 members or more according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data at the time of the study.1 There are 74 such unions, and their membership accounts for almost 90 percent of the total mem bership of all national unions. The constitutions analyzed are those in effect on Jan u ary 1, 1965. Election Procedures The referendum procedure for electing national union officers, never the predom inant method, has been declining in use. D uring the past 10 years, two im portant unions (the Carpenters and the O perating Engineers) abandoned the referendum .2 A t present, only 17 of the 74 unions studied use it.3 Summary data for these unions are shown in the accompanying table. 856 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis These 17 unions represent many adaptations of the referendum election. Two of them—D istrict 50-UM W and the Electrical W orkers-IU E —use the referendum for the election of principal n a tional officers; other officers are elected by delegate vote at the convention. In 15 of the 17 unions, the balloting is under the supervision of the local unions, w ith the ballots prepared and mailed to the locals by the national office. The locals supervise the balloting at local polling places and transm it the results to the n a tional union. The two rem aining unions employ the mail ballot referendum. The Electrical W orkers-IU E international secretary-treasurer mails a ballot directly to every qualified member, with instructions to return the ballot within a specified time. The M aritim e Union uses a hybrid of balloting methods in which the P o rt Offices distribute ballots to eligible voters, who subse quently m ark the ballots and mail them to a safety vault designated by the national office. The bal lots are taken from the safety vault and tallied by an independent party who announces the results. In the m ajority of these unions, 11 of the 17, a plurality vote elects a candidate to office. Six of the 17 elect by a m ajority vote. The T ypograph ical Union requires a m ajority for principal na tional offices, but only a plurality is required for the lesser offices. O f the six unions which require a m ajority, three provide for a runoff between the two highest candidates when none receives a m a jority in the original election. The other three meet the m ajority requirement by lim iting the number of candidates to the two receiving the greatest support in the nomination procedure. Necessarily, the referendum process requires a greater amount of time than election by conven tion delegates. W here the local supervises the ♦D ivision of R esearch and A nalysis, Office of L abor-M anage m ent P olicy D evelopm ent, L abor M anagem ent Services A dm inis tra tio n . 1 D irectory o f N a tional and In te rn a tio n a l Labor Unions in th e U nited S ta te s, 1963 (BLS B ulletin 1395, May 1964). 2 “E lection an d T enure of I n te rn a tio n a l Union Officers,” M o n th ly Labor R eview , Novem ber 1958, pp. 1221-1229. The stu d y rep o rted 25 o ut of 111 unions u sin g th e referendum . Two of these, as noted above, have changed th e ir election procedures. 3 T he U p h o lsterers norm ally elect a t convention, b u t when conventions are n o t held before th e term s of office expire, officers a re elected by m em bership referendum . T he P a in te r s ’ c o n s titu tio n provides th a t officers be elected a t convention, b ut contain s a p h rase : “ . . . w hen elections are held by referendum . . .” The co n stitu tio n does n o t specify u n d er w h a t circum stances such a referendum sh all be held. T hese 2 unions are n o t included in th e 17. REFERENDUM ELECTIONS OF NATIONAL UNION OFFICERS balloting, the results are usually required to be reported to national headquarters within a few days, but when the mail ballot is used the balloting period may span a month or even two. This greater expenditure of time and, perhaps, funds may explain the small number of national unions which use the membership referendum to elect national officers. Nomination Procedures Of the 17 national unions using the membership referendum, 6 nominate the candidates at conven tion. The Longshoremen and Warehousemen and the W oodworkers conduct a prim ary election among the convention delegates, and the two can didates for each office wTho receive the highest num ber of votes are submitted to a membership refer endum. The Clothing W orkers and the Electrical W orkers-IU F require th a t candidates obtain a minimum number of delegate endorsements in or der to be nominated. The Lithographers and Photoengravers and the Mine, Mill and Smelter W orkers do not lim it the number of candidates or specify a minimum number of delegate endorse ments. In the other 11 national unions electing officers by membership referendum , nominations are made a t the local union level. All but the Glass and Ceramic W orkers require prospective candidates to obtain a minimum number of local union en dorsements, or members in the case of the M ari time Union. F o u r of these lim it the num ber of candidates for each office by selecting, for example, the five candidates who receive the greatest num ber of local endorsements when more than five nominees receive the required minimum number of endorsements. The constitutions of the rem ain ing seven unions do not specify such a lim it on the num ber of candidates for an office. The constitutional provisions for local union nominations usually provide th a t such nom ina tions shall be by vote of the local membership at a meeting held during a particular calendar month. I t is not clear th at any of these unions require a secret ballot in the nom ination procedure. Two of them, the Retail Clerks and the Typographical Union, require a ballot, but do not specify th at it shall be secret. The Glass and Ceramic W orkers require th at “all balloting for officers and candi https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 857 dates shall be by secret ballot.” A reasonable con clusion would be th a t “candidates” refers to the nomination procedure. The M aritime Union has an unusual nom inating procedure. The candidate m ust appear before a Port. Verification Committee and present a petition signed by at least 100 members in good standing, along with a w ritten acceptance, an affidavit th a t the candidate is not a communist and has not been convicted of specified crimes, a recent photo, and w ritten evidences of sailing experience and union activity. This committee, consisting of an elected officer and four members in good standing, makes a prelim inary verification of those documents. I f the committee’s findings are favorable, the candi date is allowed to file the documents with the n a tional secretary-treasurer. I f the national office finds the documents to be in good order and the candidate otherwise eligible, he is declared nom inated. The requirements for nom inating principal offi cers is sometimes differentiated from the require ments for lesser offices, such as tellers and auditors. F o r example, the Bookbinders require 10 local union endorsements for principal national officers and 7 local endorsements for other national officers. In summary, 2 of the 6 unions which nominate at conventions, and 10 of the 11 unions wdiich have direct nom inations by the locals or members, re quire prospective candidates to obtain a minimum number of endorsements in order to appear on the ballot. Among the unions requiring local union endorsements, the Steelworkers require the largest number of local endorsements. The minimum number of local nominations in this union is “five plus one for each 10,000 members (or m ajority fraction thereof) in good standing . . .” On the basis of membership data in the 1963 B L S Direc tory, this would require 93 local nominations and represents 3 percent of the Steelworkers’ locals. This is a less stringent requirement than that im posed by the P rin tin g Pressmen, which is 10 per cent of the locals. The Shoe W orkers’ endorse ment requirement of five local nominations is prob ably the least stringent. In the unions using the referendum for officer elections, the nominations usually occur several months before the election. In unions which nom inate at convention, the period between nomination and election is usually shorter than the period 858 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 specified by unions which nominate by locals. The longest period between the nomination and election is approxim ately 5 months in four unions which nominate at the local level. The Woodworkers, who nominate at convention, provide : “The refer endum ballot . . . shall be submitted to the mem bership within ten days after the conclusion of the International Convention.” This provision al lows the least time between nomination and elec tion. The period between nomination and election is im portant because all candidates require a rea sonable period of time to inform the rank and file members of the issues and their programs- Campaign Rights and Restrictions The constitution of these 17 unions were also examined for provisions pertaining to a candi date’s campaign rights and restrictions, th a t is, provisions which m ight assist a prospective candi date in m aking his aspirations for national office known to the rank and file membership or prohibit P rocedures S p e c if ie d in N a t io n a l certain actions th at would be inimical to demo cratic elections. Such provisions seem basic to the maintenance of unions as democratic institutions. Cam paign provisions may apply to the period preceding the nomination, as well as to the pre election period. The prenomination period is im p ortant because of the opportunity it provides to secure support among the rank and file especially in those unions th at require a minimum number of local endorsements. Only two of the unions re quiring local union endorsements specify prenomi nation campaign rights. The Bookbinders and the Typographical Union allows members desir ing to be candidates to announce th eir intentions in an issue of the union’s journal, prior to the local union nominations. Preelection campaign rights are more fre quently provided. Three unions th a t use the membership referendum —the Bookbinders, the M aritime Union, and the Typographical Union— gran t nominees space in the unions’ journals to U n io n C o n s t i t u t i o n s f o r R N a t i o n a l U n io n O f f i c e r s Nomination procedures National union > Local union Total_________ ______________ Bookbinders..- - _______ ___. . . Clothing Workers________ . . _ District 50-UMW (Ind.)_______ ____ Electrical Workers-IUE. . . . . . ___ Convention delegates 10 X x X ... _ X X X 15 2 5 months.. 4 months 5 months 40 days__ X Plurality. Plurality. Plurality. X Plurality. 3 months 3 months. 50 days__ x x X Majority. Plurality. Majority. 3 months.. 1 m onth... 2 months.. 5 months . 2 months.. X 5 months.. 2 months 5 l o c a ls p i n s 1 l o c a l f o r e a c h 10 0 0 0 m e m b e r s 3 months 50 locals: 5 candidates with most endorsements. 3 m onths.. 2 nominees for each office elected in convention 10 days__ primary. 1 All national unions not identified as Independent (Ind.) are affiliated with the AFL-CIO. 2 Local unions may also nominate candidates for national office. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P r in c ip a l Election procedures Approxi mate period between Propor Local nomination union Mail tion of and election polling ballot votes required place 10 locals: 5 candidates with most endorsements. 20 delegates . . . . _ ______ 50 locals . . . _ . . . X 10 delegates from different locals from 3 districts or more having 15 percent of total per capita convention representation. No minimum _ . . . . . .... . _ 2 X No minimum X 2 nominees for each office elected in convention primary. 10 locals: 2 candidates with most endorsements. Petition 100 members m ust sign petition of candidacy__ X No minimum______ . . . . . . .. 50 locals 10 percent of locals from 15 States or provinces. 5 candidates with most endorsements. 25 locals _ _ ____ ___ 5 locals - x _ . . l e c t io n o f 6 x Glass and Ceramic W orkers... ______ X Lithographers and Photoengravers... . Longshoremen and Warehousemen (Ind.). Machinists . . . . . . ______ X M aritim e_______ __ _ ____ Petition Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers (Ind.). Mine Workers, United (Ind.).. ___ . X Printing Pressmen___. . . ______ X Retail Clerks . . . Shoe Workers___ . . . Steelworkers____ . . . . . .. Typographical____ Woodworkers. _ . . . . ... Endorsements required E eferendum X X x X X x x X X Majority. Plurality. Plurality. Plurality. Majority. Plurality. Plurality. Plurality. Majority. Majority. REFERENDUM ELECTIONS OF NATIONAL UNION OFFICERS present their side of the issues, but require th a t these articles be true and nondefamatory. The Electrical W orkers-IU E publishes a list of all nominees, and also allows candidates to publish statements in the union journal, without any regu lation of the content of these statements. The Glass and Ceramic W orkers, the Machinists, and the P rin tin g Pressmen provide th at a list of all nominees be printed in an issue of their respective journals prior to nom ination; there is no provision for a statement by each candidate. The M aritime Union’s constitution states that personal columns in the Pilot shall not be used for electioneering purposes, and the Glass and Ce ramic W orkers’ constitution obligates the union’s international executive board to see th at the Glass Worker News is not misused to fu rth er the interest of any member for union office. The Mine, Mill and Smelter W orkers specifically prohibits the use of defam atory statements to “influence the elec tion” in the union’s journal or in any literature us ing the union’s seal. This union provides th at an international officer violating the prohibition shall be removed from office by direction of the general executive board and a new election including the rem aining nominees be held. Several constitu tions contain the LM RDA prohibition against the use of the organization’s funds to promote the candidacy of any person. The Typographical Union specifically allows the establishment of parties to support a nominee for office, and the constitution has many provisions which make the candidate responsible for actions of his supporters. The union requires th at candi dates and members file complete financial state ments regarding moneys collected and spent during the campaign period ; only union members may contribute to these campaign funds. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 859 The Glass and Ceramic W orkers is the only un ion which specifically allows any member in good standing to attend any local meeting, thereby giv ing the candidates the opportunity to reach the members before the nominations and elections. Such visitors have voice but no vote. Though not a campaign right, knowledge of the time at which nominations are to be made is also helpful in reaching members prior to nomination. None of the constitutions specify a date on which local endorsements would be voted. The provi sions on the time of nomination are usually gen eral, stating th at nominations shall occur at a regular meeting in a special month or not later than a certain period prior to the election (for example, no later than 4 months before the election). A lthough the Glass and Ceramic W orkers does not have a minimum num ber of local endorsements, each local is required to notify the international union of the scheduled date for nomi nations. This inform ation is published in the un ion’s journal. Knowledge of the date of the elections is also im portant to the candidate in planning his cam paign. Nine of the 17 unions schedule elections for a specific day of a particular month, such as the second Tuesday in A pril of election years. Two other unions specify only th at elections will be held at the first regular meeting in a particular month, without giving a specific date. Five un ions specify th at elections will be held within a cer tain period, such as 40 days, after the convention nomination. The M aritime Union, which nomi nates by membership petition, schedules a mailballot election for the period A pril 1-May 31. In this union, and in the nine unions which schedule elections for a specific day of the month, a can didate has an exact target for planning his campaign. Out-of-School Youth—Two Years Later A 1965 Resurvey of Young Men in a 1963 Study of Early Work Experience Assesses the Relative Progress of Graduates and Dropouts V era C. P errella and E liz a b e t h W a l d m a n * The w o r k p r o g r e s s of young men w ith less school ing is not as great as th a t made by their contem poraries who have finished high school or had some college. This lag occurs even in a period of expanding employment and incipient labor short ages. W hatever measure is used—unemployment rate, earnings, steadiness of employment, and so on—the men w ith more education made greater advances over the 2-year period which elapsed be tween two surveys.1 The men w ith more education also made more effort tow ard self-improvement, as indicated by the greater proportion taking additional education or form al job training. The young men who left school before finishing high school not only may not have had the minimal education required to learn more specialized skills but probably had less m otivation and adaptability, which slowed their progress. A group of young men who had been inter viewed in a nationwide sample study of the early work experience of out-of-school youth were resurveyed in F ebruary 1965 to assess the relative progress of the dropouts and graduates. A t the time of the first survey in February 1963, the men were 16 to 21 years old and were no longer enrolled in regular school. The group included school dropouts and high school graduates, but excluded those who were college graduates. The discussion which follows relates to 2.4 m il lion of the 2.7 million young men who were cov ered by the first survey in February 1963. About 240,000 of the original number were in the Armed Forces as of February 1965 and were not included in the followup survey. The 2.4 million civilian men in the followup survey were about equally divided between drop 860 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis outs and graduates.2 One-half of the men were 22 and 23 years old as of February 1965 and a m ajor ity in these ages were graduates; the 20 and 21 year olds were about equally divided between graduates and dropouts, and nearly all of the small num ber of those age 18 and 19 were dropouts: Percent distribution Graduates Dropouts A ll men Age 1, 212 12, 428 1, 206 Total: Number . . . . . ______ 100.0 100.0 100.0 P e r c e n t._______ ______ 17.3 0.6 ______ 9.1 18 and 19 years old____ 39.3 41.3 40.1 20 and 21 years old . . . ____________ 60.1 41.4 50.8 22 and 23 years o l d . __ . . . . .. ______ 1 Includes some men for whom data on educational attainment were not known. ♦Of th e D ivision of L abor F orce S tudies, B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s. 1 See Special L abor F orce R eports Nos. 46 an d 47, “Out-ofSchool Youth, F e b ru ary 1963,” P a r t s I and II, fo r findings of th e first survey. T h e p re se n t a rtic le is based p rim a rily on in fo rm a tion from q u estio n n a ires se n t in F e b ru a ry 1965 to th e m en cov ered by th e F e b ru a ry 1963 survey. T h e original and follow up surveyis w ere conducted fo r th e B u reau of L abor S ta tistic s by th e B ureau of th e Census. In th is rep o rt, d a ta re la te to persons 18 to 23 y ears old in th e civilian n o n in stitu tio n a l p o p ulatio n in th e calen d ar week ending Feb. 13, 1965, an d p e rta in only to th e m en who w ere n o t in the A rm ed F orces a s of th e resurvey date. Men who w ere serving in th e A rm ed F orces or w ere inm ates of in s titu tio n s a s of th e first survey d a te in F eb ru ary 1963 were excluded from both th e first survey and th e follow up. Since estim ates re su ltin g from th is survey a re based on a sam ple, they m ay differ from th e figures t h a t would have been obtained from a com plete census. T he sam pling v a ria b ility m ay be relativ ely larg e in cases w here th e n um bers a re sm all. Be cause of th e com paratively sm all size of th e group covered in th is survey, th e num ber of sam ple cases t h a t could be used w as sm all, an d sta tis tic a lly reliab le d a ta byi color could n o t be ob tained. N um bers u n d er 200,000 an d p ercen ts based on them should be used w ith caution. 2 T he classification of th e m en by ed u catio n al a tta in m e n t is as of th e ir F e b ru a ry 1963 sta tu s , w ith o u t reference to any subse quent schooling. A ccordingly, references to g ra d u a te s an d d rop o uts a re to years of school com pleted a s of th e first survey period in F e b ru ary 1963. The term “d ro p o u ts” refe rs to th e m en who le ft school before g ra d u a tin g from high s c h o o l; th e term “g ra d u a te s ” refe rs to th e m en w ho h ad g ra d u ated from high school, and includes men who had sp e n t some tim e in college b u t w ere n o t college g rad u ates. OUT-OF-SCHOOL YOUTH—TWO YEARS LATER T able 1. J ob T r a in in g T a k e n S in c e F e b r u a r y Item Percent taking training by educational attainment: Total_______ Dropouts. Graduates. Percent distribution of persons taking training by— Completion of training: Total_________________________________ Training completed.......................... ........ Still taking training_________________ Training dropped before completion___ Place of training: Total______________ __________________ Special schools_____________________ Company training programs__________ Apprenticeships____________________ O ther.____ _______________________ Kind of training: Total_________________________________ Profess ional, technical, and kindred 1__ Mechanics, auto____________________ Mechanics, except auto______________ Construction craftsmen______________ Operatives 2_______________________ Other________________ ____________ 861 1963 Percent 19.1 12.9 25.4 100.0 40.1 40.6 19.2 100.0 38.6 38.4 9.6 13.4 100.0 20.9 12.0 13.0 9.2 8.0 36.9 1 Except teachers and medical and other health workers. 2 Except drivers and deliverymen. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals- About half the men were unm arried as of Feb ruary 1965 w ith a larger proportion of dropouts than graduates in this m arital category. Since they were younger,, a higher proportion of the dropouts were still single after 2 years. Back to School O f each year’s group of school leavers some return to school after a short time. Some high school graduates who do not go to college immedi ately upon graduation do go at a later time. Others who leave school before graduating from high school or college sometime also return to school. Experience in the job m arket convinces some th at more education would help them. About 13 percent of the young men in the followup group returned to school at some time during the 2 years following F ebruary 1963. Only about 1 out of 20 of the dropouts returned compared with 1 out of 5 of the graduates (chart 1 ). The very small proportion of dropouts returning to school is probably related to the reasons they gave in 1963 for dropping out of school. Nearly one-half of those who had quit school had reported in 1963 th a t they were not interested in school, had poor grades or had had difficulties with school authorities. 8 Job tra in in g in th is re p o rt includes only fo rm al tra in in g tak en in special schools such a s trad e, business and beauty schools, correspondence schools, com pany schools, A rm ed F orces schools, an d ap p ren ticesh ip s ; i t does n o t include any vocational or o th er tra in in g received in the re g u la r schools. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Almost tw o-thirds of the men returning to school were still in school as of February 1965—about evenly divided between full- and part-tim e stu dents. About 8 out of 10 of those who were still attending school were in college, reflecting the high proportion of all school returnees who were high school graduates as of the February 1963 survey date. Job Training Yoimg men often take job training after leaving regular school to qualify for the better jobs. In the 2 years between surveys, about one-fifth of the men had taken some form al job training.3 G rad uates were twice as likely as dropouts to have done so (table 1). Most of the men had taken their training in special schools or company training program s; only 10 percent had been in apprenticeship pro grams. Of those who had started a form al job training program , 20 percent had dropped out before completing it, 10 percent had completed the training, and 40 percent were still in the programs. The occupations for which the young men trained covered a wide spectrum, ranging from ac counting, embalming, and computer program ing Chart 1. Percent of Graduates and Dropouts Who Returned to School Between February 1963 and February 1965 R e la tiv e ly 3l/2 t im e s a s m a n y g r a d u a te s a s d r o p o u ts r e tu r n e d to s c h o o l. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 862 to appliance servicing, plumbing, tool and die making, and barbering. A fifth of the men who had taken job training had trained for occupations in professional, technical, and related fields (other than medical and health work and teaching) ; and approxim ately one-fourth took training as me chanics, equally divided between auto mechanics and all other types of mechanics. Increase in Labor Force Only 5 percent of the men were not in the labor force in February 1965, a smaller proportion than 2 years earlier (table 2). W hile the pro portion of the graduates out of the labor force was not significantly different as of the twTo dates, the proportion for the dropouts declined by over h alf to 5 percent in February 1965, the same rate as for graduates. This increase in labor force participation by the dropouts is prim arily because of their age ; nearly all of the boys who were 16 or 17 years old a t the time of the 1963 survey had dropped out of school. Only a small proportion of the men who had been in the labor force in Feb ruary 1963 were out of it 2 years later, and only one-fourth who were out of the labor force at the earlier date were also out in F ebruary 1965. In view of the concern about young men who are no longer in school and are not in the labor force, it is noteworthy that only 5 percent of the young men in the followup group were outside the labor force in February 1965. O f this group, 4 of 10 said they were not working because they were T a ble 2. E F e b r u a r y 1963 m p l o y m e n t S t a t u s in F e b r u a r y 1965 All m e n 1 Dropouts Graduates 1963 1965 1963 1965 _ _ ... 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 In labor force _ . . . __ . . . . Not in labor force__ ____ 95.1 4.9 90.6 9.4 95.3 4.7 8 8 .0 1 2 .0 95.3 4.7 93.6 6.4 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 Employed . . . _ _ . . 89.6 F u lltim e ... ._ _____ _ 84.6 Part time__ ___ _ ._ 5.0 Unemployed .. _ _ _ . _ 10.4 1 to 4 weeks _ _________ 3.5 5 to 14 weeks 5.5 15 weeks or more 1.4 81.2 82.3 77.0 5.3 17.7 6.6 8.7 2.4 74.0 96.8 92.0 4.9 3.2 .4 2.3 .4 1963 I n L a b o r F orce Total_____________ __ ( 2) (2) 18.8 7.5 6.0 5.3 ( 2) ( 2) 26.0 9.9 8 .2 7.9 87.9 ( 2) (2) 1 2 .1 5.2 4. 1 2 .8 1 Includes some men for whom data on educational attainment were not available. 1 Not available. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic expansion between February 1963 and February 1965 resulted in a decrease in un employment rates for the young men surveyed, as if did for all men in the labor force. The 10 per cent rate was about double th at for all men in the labor force. B ut both dropouts and graduates had much lower unemployment rates in February 1965 than 2 years earlier.4 In 1965, the unem ployment rate for dropouts was considerably greater than th a t for graduates, 17.7 percent com pared with 3.2 percent. The difference in the rates may not be as great as the indicated 5 to 1 ratio, however, because the rates are based on small numbers and are therefore subject to considerable sampling variability. One-fourth of the young men who had been unemployed in February 1963 were also jobless 2 years la te r; only 6 percent of those employed at the earlier date were jobless in February 1965. O f the men unemployed in February 1963, greater proportions of dropouts than graduates were also jobless in February 1965 (30 percent and 11 percent, respectively). In addition to a decrease in unemployment rates between the two survey dates, there was also a sharp decrease (to 14 from 28 percent) in the proportion of jobless young men who had been unemployed 15 weeks or more. The Young Men’s Jobs 1965 T otal.__ A Decrease in Unemployment and [Percent distribution] Employment status going to school, and most of the rest were waiting to join the Armed Forces or were ill or unable to work because of physical or m ental disabilities. Nearly all the employed young men no longer in school, both dropouts and graduates, worked at full-tim e jobs; only 6 percent usually worked p art time—a proportion approxim ating that for all men 25 to 64 years of age. Among the employed young men, 1 out of 4 of the dropouts but only 1 out of 6 of the graduates had been working for less than 6 months on the jobs they had in February 1965 (table 3). On the other hand, the same proportions of the employed dropouts and graduates had been working at their jobs for more than 2 years. The greater propor4 The unem ploym ent ra te fo r all out-of-school m en 18 to 23 years old who w ere in th e civilian labor force in F eb ru ary 1965 w as also 1 o ut of every 10. 863 OUT-OF-SCHOOL YOUTH—TWO YEARS LATER T a b l e 3. L ength 1965, T i m e on J ob H e l d O ccupation G ro up of by in F ebruary [Percent distribution] Length of time on job Occupation group and educational attainm ent Total Total Less 6 to 11 1 to 2 More than 6 months years than 2 years months _____ 100.0 20.4 15.0 Total_______ - ____ 100.0 100.0 25.3 12.8 All men. 23.6 41.0 D ropouts Craftsmen, foremen, and kindred workers ______ Operatives and kindred workers__ __________ -Laborers, except farm and mine ____ ________ All other _______________ 23.5 38.4 23.6 100.0 28.4 9.6 15.4 46.6 35.1 100.0 25.7 12.5 29.6 32.2 16.7 24.6 100.0 100.0 21.1 23.3 19.0 13.9 26.5 18.3 33.3 44.6 _ . _ 100.0 100.0 16.5 16.7 23.6 43.2 10.4 100.0 18.8 17.9 14.3 49.1 12.5 100.0 11.9 8.1 34.1 45.9 18.0 100.0 13.7 18.4 16.3 51.6 G raduates Total____ _ Professional, technical, and managerial___ _ __ Clerical and kindred work ers ___ _ ______ Craftsmen, foremen, and kindred workers_______ Operatives and kindred workers__ - __________ Laborers, except farm and mine __ _ __ _ All other________________ 30.5 100.0 17.6 19.1 28.5 34.8 10.8 17.8 100.0 100.0 23.1 10.9 14.5 19.2 18.8 25.4 43.6 44.6 N ote : Because ofrounding, sums of individual items m aynot equal totals. tion of dropouts than graduates w ith less than 6 months on the job results both from their higher unemployment rate and their relatively younger age. Younger men, who are more likely to be single, feel freer to shift voluntarily from one job to another than do men who have fam ily responsibilities. The occupation groups in which the dropouts and graduates were employed in February 1965 m irrored to some degree the differences in extent of their education. Over one-fourth of the g rad uates—but only 11 percent of the dropouts—held white-collar jobs. Undoubtedly, the small propor tion of graduates who had 1 year or more of college accounts for p a rt of this difference. As with the male labor force, the largest proportions of both dropouts and graduates were employed as operatives and craftsm en (table 4). A pproxi mately equal proportions of dropouts and g rad uates worked in service occupations or as farm wTorkers. A considerable amount of shifting from job to job, voluntary and involuntary, takes place in the first years after a young person enters the labor force; these years serve as a time for feeling out the job market, gaining experience, adapting https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis to the discipline of work, and try in g to get and hold jobs. Between 1963 and 1965, an impressive amount of occupation change took place among the dropouts and g rad u ates: H a lf of the number who were employed as of both periods were no longer in the same occupation group in 1965. Graduates and dropouts were equally likely to have changed their occupations. Since each of the m ajor occupation groups includes a wide range of occupations, the num ber of men who were em ployed at quite dissim ilar kinds of work, even though they remained in the same occupation group, was undoubtedly even larger. The m ajor occupation group, operatives, for example, in cludes such diverse work as assembler, truck driver, and meatcutter. A larger proportion of the young men stayed in blue-collar than in white-collar occupations. Some white-collar jobs in the clerical and sales fields, particularly a t the outset, pay less than some of the blue-collar jobs. Another factor lim iting the direction of movement is th at men who are qualified to work in white-collar jobs may more easily qualify for certain types of blue-collar jobs than may blue-collar workers for white-collar oc cupations. W ithin the blue-collar occupations, there was more movement from operatives to craftsmen than to any other occupation. Among the men who were craftsm en in 1963, about 6 out of 10 remained craftsmen, but 3 out of 10 moved to white-collar occupations. Among those who had been white-collar workers in 1963, 6 of 10 were still doing the same general kind of work in 1965; nearly all the others were bluecollar workers, prim arily operatives. In this surT a b l e 4. O c c u p a t io n G r o u p i n F e b r u a r y 1963 a n d F e b r u a r y 1965 f o r M e n E m p l o y e d a t B o t h T im e s [Percent distribution] Occupation group All men 1 1965 1963 Dropouts Graduates 1965 1965 1963 Total_____ _____ _________ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Professional, technical, and managerial workers_______ . . . . . . . 7.3 Clerical and kindred workers. _ . . 9.7 4.4 Sales workers. . _______________ Craftsmen, foremen, and kindred . . . . . . ___ 21.2 w orkers__________ Operatives and kindred workers___ 31.0 Service workers... 6.4 Farmers and farm laborers .. . . . . 6.9 Laborers, except farm and mine___ 13.1 1963 100.0 3.6 11.6 3.3 3.9 4.5 3.0 .8 5.6 2.9 9.8 13.5 4.9 5.6 16.0 3.0 11.5 35.2 5.5 11.1 18.4 23.2 34.0 6.8 7.7 17.0 10.5 36.1 5.0 16.2 23.0 20.0 28.9 6.2 6.4 10.4 12.2 34.7 5.9 7.5 15.1 1 Includes some men for whom data on educational attainm ent were not available. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 864 vey (selected to exclude college graduates) the young men in white-collar jobs in both 1963 and 1965 showed less progression from relatively low skill occupation groups to higher skill ones than did the men who were blue-collar workers in both periods. N otw ithstanding the individual occupational changes over the 2-year period, the overall occupa tional distribution of the dropouts and graduates in February 1965 differed only slightly from th a t in February 1963. Some upw ard shift of the dis tribution is a p p a re n t: the proportion of dropouts employed as craftsm en had doubled between 1963 and 1965, but the proportion of farm ers and farm laborers decreased by about half. A small rise over the period in the proportion of graduates who were in professional and m anagerial occu pations may reflect the fact th a t some of them had obtained additional schooling between the two survey periods. Weekly Earnings Dropouts reported lower weekly earnings on the job at which they were employed in February 1965 than did graduates (table 5). H a lf of the graduates but only three-tenths of the dropouts had weekly earnings of $100 or more. The pro portion of dropouts earning less than $60 a week was three times as large as the proportion of g rad uates. The dropouts were somewhat younger, had worked a shorter length of time on the 1965 job, were more likely to hold an unskilled job, and even within the same occupation group may have T a b l e 5. U s u a l W e e k l y E a r n i n g s R e p o r t e d I n F e b r u a r y 1963 A n d F e b r u a r y 1965 F or M e n E m p l o y e d as of B o th D a t e s [Percent distribution] Weekly earnings Date and educational attainm ent Less Total than $50 $50 to $59 $60 to $79 $80 to $99 $100 and over Me dian earn ings All M en 1 1965______ 1963_________ 100. C 8.0 100.0 23.3 7.7 15.1 21.4 33.4 22.0 17.8 40.9 10.4 $91. 77 $60. 70 D ropouts 1965________ 1963___________ 100.0 100.0 14.8 37.5 10.7 14.8 26.0 26.6 18.0 13.7 30.5 7.4 $61.88 $50.84 Graduates 1965_______ 1963_________ 100.0 100.0 3.4 13.9 5.6 15.3 18.5 38.3 24.2 20.1 48.2 12.4 $98. 54 $61.09 1 Includes some men for whom data on educational attainm ent were not available. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis T able 6. E x ten t of L abor F orce E x p e r ie n c e in 1964 [Percent distribution] Total Drop Grad outs u ates Labor force experience All men, total: Num ber___________________ >2, 428 Percent____________________ 100.0 1,206 100. 0 1,212 100.0 Not in labor force________________ - __________ Tn labor force - _____ - - - - - _ _ ___ _ 2.7 97.3 2.9 97.1 2.2 97.8 In labor force_____________________________ 100.0 100.0 100.0 Worked during year;___________________________ By number of weeks: 1 to 26 weeks___________ . . _ . - _____ 27 to 49 weeks_______ _____ _____50 to 52 weeks___ ________ - _____ ___ By extent of unemployment: With no unemployment______________ With unemployment- - - - ___ ________ Unemployed 1 to 14 weeks____ _______ Unemployed 15 weeks or more__ _ 99.0 97.9 100.0 15.9 25.8 57.2 20.7 32.6 44.5 11.7 19.8 68.5 70.4 28.6 18.3 10.3 60.9 36.8 22.2 14.6 79.0 21.0 14.7 6.3 1.0 2.1 Did not work, but looked for work _______ _____ 1 Includes some men for whom data on educational attainm ent were not available. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. been paid less. Moreover, the graduates include some men with 1 year or more of college whose higher earnings would raise the average for the graduates to some extent. Among youths who were employed in both Feb ruary 1963 and F ebruary 1965, graduates, as ex pected, made more progress in earnings than did dropouts. The relative progress of the graduates and dropouts is even more apparent if the number in a given earnings group in the earlier period are distributed according to their earnings in 1965. A th ird of the dropouts, but only 6 percent of the graduates who were earning less than $50 a week in 1963, were still earning th a t little in their 1965 j obs. A Year’s Work Experience D uring the year 1964, the extent of employment and unemployment and the annual earnings of the young men demonstrated th at graduates were better off than dropouts. A larger proportion of graduates had wTorked the entire year, relatively fewer had some unemployment, and their annual earnings were higher. The graduates were also in jobs generally less vulnerable to seasonal and other layoffs. Nearly all of the young men had been in the la bor force at some time during 1964. There was, however, a substantial difference in the propor tions of graduates and dropouts who were yearround (50 to 52 weeks) labor force participants— 8 of 10 graduates, but only 2 of 3 dropouts. Fewer 865 OUT-OF-SCHOOL YOUTH—TWO YEARS LATER than 10 percent of the young men had been in the labor force for 6 months or less. Some of the men who had not been in the labor force the entire year may have been ill, in the Armed Forces, or going to school. Others may have decided that they did not want to work for several weeks or months, or may have become temporarily discour aged by unsuccessful jobseeking. Fewer than half the dropouts, but two-thirds of the graduates, in the labor force had worked all year, reflecting the smaller proportion of dropouts who were in the labor force the entire year and also their higher incidence of unemployment (table 6). Long-term unemployment in 1964 (a total of 15 weeks or more regardless of the number of times the men were jobless) was several times more com5 Self-em ployed persons w ere included am ong m en who h ad only one employer. Chart 2. mon among the dropouts, even though they tended to be in the labor force fewer weeks than the grad uates. About 1 out of 6 dropouts, but only 1 out of 16 graduates, had been jobless a total of 15 weeks or more during 1964. Job Changing Men change jobs for many reasons—layoffs, slack work, employers going out of business, the desire to improve their status, as well as other per sonal reasons. Of the dropouts and graduates who had worked at some time during 1964, 4 of 10 reported changing jobs at least once during the year.5 Among year-round workers, approximately 2 of 10 dropouts and 3 of 10 graduates reported they had worked for more than one employer. The higher job mobility among graduates may reflect Percent Distribution of 1964 Annual Earnings of Graduates and Dropouts Median annual earnings in 1964 for men with work experience were 50 percent greater for graduates than for dropouts. For those who worked year round, the difference was considerably lower. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 866 One of 20 of the dropouts and 1 of 5 of the gradu ates had returned to school between February 1963 and February 1965. One-fifth of the men had taken formal job train ing since leaving school in February 1963 or were still taking it. Graduates were twice as likely as dropouts to have done so. A smaller proportion of the men were unemployed in February 1965 than 2 years earlier, reflecting the improved economic conditions over the period. A greater proportion of the graduates than drop outs who were employed both in February 1963 and February 1965 were earning $100 or more a week in their February 1965 jobs. Two-thirds of the graduates but fewer than half of the dropouts who worked in 1964 were employed all year (50 weeks or more). better knowledge of the job market and greater opportunities for better qualified workers to ob tain different jobs. However, among both drop outs and graduates, over half of those who had worked less than a full year reported having more than one employer. The wide difference in the proportions of full- and part-year workers reflects in part the fact that some of the young men who had worked less than 50 weeks during 1964 may have been laid off at least once during the year and then found a different job. Annual Earnings Median earnings for the young men in the fol lowup survey who had worked in 1964 were https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 $3,412—considerably lower than the $5,191 median for all men 14 years old and over with work experience during the year. Since many of the young men were at the beginning of their career in 1964, they could not command the higher wages of more experienced workers. Also, a greater proportion of adult men (25 to 64 years) than of the youth work all year and therefore are able to earn more. The graduates’ median earnings of nearly $4,000 were about 50 percent greater than the $2,600 for dropouts6 (chart 2). Differences in pay resulting from differences in occupational distribution and in the number of weeks worked by dropouts and graduates undoubtedly affect the annual figures. A greater proportion of the graduates than drop outs worked all year, and this too contributed to the larger annual earnings of graduates. Among those who worked all year, graduates had higher average earnings than dropouts, $4,000 and $3,740, respectively, a difference of 18 percent. Nearly 6 out of 10 dropouts, but only 3 out of 10 graduates, had earned less than $3,000 in 1964, again a result of the occupational distributions and weeks worked. For all men who had worked 50 to 52 weeks, there was some improvement in these proportions, but differences between graduates and dropouts persisted—37 percent of the dropouts with year-round jobs had earned less than $3,000 in 1964, double the percentage for graduates. 0 D a ta from o th e r sources ind icate t h a t earn in g s differences betw een g ra d u a te s and d ro p o u ts p e rsis t over a lifetim e. F o r ex am ple, see H erm an M iller, “E d u catio n : An A dvantage fo r a L ife tim e,” O ccupational Outlook Q uarterly, Decem ber 1963, p. 5. Summaries of Studies and Reports Labor and the Spanish Syndical System E N o t e .— This article is based upon a re cent volume by the author, who is Professor of Economics, Indiana University. Research for the study, Labor Policy and Practices in Spain: A Study of Employer-Employee Rela tions Under the Franco Regime (New York, Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., 1965), was con ducted during a 6-month residence in Spain. d ito r ’s O n e o f t h e f ir s t acts of the Franco Government after the termination of the Spanish Civil War was to abolish the free Spanish labor movement1 and to create the Spanish Syndical Organization, the only legal “trade union” movement in the na tion. Employers as well as employees are com pelled to belong to this organization and pay dues to finance its operation; no other employer and employee organization is permitted to deal with labor relations. The syndical system is an important feature of the national-syndical type of state created by the Franco regime. Spain’s economy is divided into 28 broad categories of activity (e.g., chemicals; construction; radio, TV, and the press; metal). A national syndical organization is established for each activity, and each organization must belong to the Spanish Syndical Organization. Organs of the syndical system are present in each of Spain’s 50 provinces and exist in the smaller geo graphical units as well as in many of the produc tion facilities. Regardless of the level of opera tion, each syndicate is divided into employer and employee sections, which represent employer and employee interests, respectively. The Spanish Syndical Organization and its com ponent parts are in effect institutions of the Span ish Government and are required to conform to https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and carry out the policies of the State. The law creating the organization stated that it “assures the subordination of the syndical organization to the Party \Falange, the only lawful political party in Spain] and only this party can establish the discipline, the unity and the spirit necessary to serve national policy.” 2 As the Falange is dedi cated to furthering the interests of the Spanish State, it follows that the syndicate system is like wise an instrument of the Spanish Government.3 Though Spanish workers and employers may elect some syndical representatives, the important posts carrying policymaking functions are filled by government appointments. The fact that the elected representatives are far more numerous than the appointed representatives is irrelevant in this connection. Perhaps the best evidence of the dependence of the syndicate comes from the establishment of com pulsory wage control policy announced by the Spanish Government in November 1964 in an effort to control the serious inflation then in force in Spain.4 The Spanish Government announced a compulsory policy of wage control designed to equate wage increases to productivity increases. This policy was put into force despite declarations by high-ranking government and syndical leaders that wages were not the cause of the Spanish in flation. In October 1964, the Minister of Labor had stated that he was “absolutely against any 1 L ey de Unidad Sindical (L aw of Syndical U n ity ), Ja n . 26, 1940. 2 L a Ley de Bases de L a Organización Sindical (Law fo r the bases of Syndical O rganization) Dec. 6, 1940. 3 T here is ad d itio n al evidence in th e d eclaratio n in the F u ero de Trabajo (R ig h ts of L abor) w hich was forged du rin g the S panish Civil W ar, prom ulgated by th e F a la n ge on M ar. 9, 1938, an d elevated to the s ta tu s of a fu n d am en tal law of S pain in 1947. I t s t a t e s : “th e v ertical [including em ployers and em ployees] syndical system is an in stru m e n t to th e Service of the S tate, th ro u g h w hich [th e S ta te ] shall realize, principally, its econom ic policy.” 4 F ro m Ja n u a ry 1963 u n til Septem ber 1964, S pain’s Consum er P rice Index increased by 12.7 percent. F rom Ja n u a ry 1964 u n til Septem ber 1964, i t increased by 7.2 percent, Indicadores Económ icos, I n s titu to N acional de E stald ística, M adrid, Oct. 30, 1964. 867 868 position which serves to block wage increases.” 5 The Secretary General of the Spanish Syndical Organization said that he disagreed “absolutely that the collective bargaining agreements are the cause for the increase of prices.” 6 Despite these declarations, the Minister of Labor 1 month later implemented the compulsory wage control pro gram, and the Syndical Organization lodged no official protest when the wage control program was announced. Strike Activity Though unlawful, strikes still occur in Spain. It is estimated that from 80,000 to 100,000 Spanish workers were involved in strikes in 1962. In 1963, the figure was somewhat lower, and in the spring of 1964, strike activity included only 40,000 work ers. The Asturias coal-mining area was the major location of the strikes. Asturias’ striking miners were demanding higher wages, improved working conditions, the right to strike, and independent unions. The strike was terminated only after the Spanish Government, through the Ministry of Labor, bypassed the official worker representatives and dealt with ad hoc representatives chosen by the strikers. Upon several occasions, charges have been filed with the International Labor Organization against the Spanish Government for its treatment of strik ers.7 These charges have involved the imprison ment and brutal treatment of strikers, forced de portation of strikers from the scene of a strike to other locations in Spain, and penalties against em ployers who had hired workers participating in the strikes. In defense, the Spanish Government contended that the strikers were Communist inspired and had sought to overthrow the regime, and that these activities did not therefore constitute normal trade union objectives. It did not deny its arrest of the strikers or its compulsory residence orders; it did deny torturing imprisoned strikers. Attempting to determine the factual basis for the arrest of the strikers, the ILO requested the judgment of the courts which had sentenced them; groups within Spain requested that an international commission investigate the imprisonment and the treatment of strikers. The ILO request was denied and the Spanish Government refused to agree to the inter https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 national investigation. The Spanish groups then asked that the situation be investigated by a com mission composed only of Spanish attorneys and judges. This request was similarly denied. Minimum Labor Standards When the Franco Government forbade free labor unions and abrogated the right to strike, the State imposed minimum labor standards. The system of standards, or reglamentaciones, is pro mulgated by the Ministry of Labor and binds most employers. These codes regulate almost every feature of working conditions in detail (employers may provide employees with better conditions of employment than those specified in these minimum codes). Each of the 200 separate reglamentaciones covers a particular segment of a major branch of an industry which is enclosed within one syndicate. Applied across the board, the labor standards may not reflect the economic realities of a particular situation. Herein is the basic defect of the system. Within the straitjacket of the reglamentaciones system, both em ployers and employees are denied the opportunity for optimum utilization of their resources in the terms of economic progress. Collective Bargaining Partly because of the defects of the system of minimum labor standards, the Spanish Govern ment. authorized the negotiation of collective agreements between employers and employees.8 Before that time, collective bargaining in any form had been forbidden. Initially hesitant, Spanish employers and employees have since made widespread use of their new freedom. As of Sep tember 30, 1964, a total of 4,532 collective bargain ing agreements covering 5,338,777 workers and ap plying to 1,620,346 firms had been negotiated—the total Spanish labor force amounted to about 13 5A B C , Oct. n ew sp ap er.) 15, 1964. (A B C is a leading M adrid daily 6Solidaridad Nacional (B arcelo n a), Oct. 4, 1964. See discu s sion of the colelctive b arg ain in g system . 7 See Official B ulletin, In te rn a tio n a l L abor Office, Ju ly 1964, Vol. 47, No. 31, Supp. 11, pp. 58-65. * L ey de Convenios Colectivos Sindicales (Law of Syndical Collective A greem ents) Apr. 24, 1958. LABOR AND THE SPANISH SYNDICAL SYSTEM million of whom, about 10 million were considered possible participants in collective agreements.9 Although authorization of collective bargaining reflects a more liberal attitude on the part of the Spanish Government in industrial relations, the collective bargaining system remains under the direction of the Government. Contracts must be negotiated within the framework of the Spanish Syndical Organization, and approval of the Min istry of Labor is necessary before an agreement becomes effective. Though agreed to by employeremployee representatives, entire contracts or spe cific provisions may be vetoed by the Minister of Labor or his subordinates. The advent of collective bargaining within Spain did not, of course, legalize the strike. Dis putes involving the interpretation or application of labor agreements are resolved by compulsory arbitration, with Government officials serving as arbitrators. Through the Ministry of Labor the State is empowered to break any impasse by com pulsory arbitration. Recent trends indicate that a growing number of agreements are being put into force by decrees of the Ministry of Labor. For the years 1959 through 1962, the Spanish Syndical Organization reported a total of 115 instances in which the employer-employee repre sentatives were unable to reach an agreement at the bargaining table. From 1963 through the first 9 months of 1964, however, the number of compul sory arbitration awards totaled 227. Though Spanish wages are low in comparison with other European nations;, they are higher than in former years, and employers are accordingly assuming a stiffer attitude at the bargaining table. Price Increase Disclaimer As a defense against wage-induced inflation, the Spanish collective bargaining law is designed to discourage agreements that could result in price increases. After a contract has been agreed to by the employer and employee representatives, it must be decided whether or not the contract will result 9 “E s ta d ístic a G eneral de Los Convenios! S indicales Desde La P rom ulgación de L a Ley (1958) H a s ta E l 30 de Ju n io de 1964,” V icesecretaria N acional de O rdenación Social, O rganización S indical E spañola, p. 1. 10 S u m m a ry o f th e S p a n ish E conom ic and Social D evelopm ent P lan, 1964-1967 (M adrid, Com m ission of th e G overnm ent Devel opm ent P lan , Office of P u b lic R elations, 19640, P- 17. 11 Indicadores Económ icos, op. cit., Ju ly -A u g u st, 1964. 2 2 4 -9 6 6 o — m — — 3 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 869 in a price increase. If employer and employee representatives decide no price increase will result, the law requires their statement to that effect in the agreement. With this price increase dis claimer, the contract may be put into effect (if the Ministry of Labor subsequently approves the agreement). On the other hand, if either or both parties believe that the contract will increase prices, the contemplated price increase must be approved by the Spanish Commission on Economic Affairs. Without such approval, the contract may not be put into effect. Although the parties rarely indicate that their agreements will increase prices, employers have discovered several ways of increasing prices, in spite of this provision in the law, even without apparent economic justification. For example, some Spanish employers increase prices prior to or during negotiations as a hedge against any wageincrease that subsequently may be agreed to by the parties. Loopholes exist in such abundance that this experiment has proved nearly worthless as an anti-inflationary measure. Though this stabilizing device has proved inef fective, studies conducted by the Spanish Syndical Organization demonstrate that wages negotiated under the Spanish collective bargaining system are higher than those established by the State-imposed reglamentaciones. Since the 1958 law, there has been some improvement in the workers’ relative position in the Spanish economy. Real wages increased by about 30 percent during the period 1960-63. Yet in 1964, an agency of the Spanish Government, commenting upon the distribution of national income, stated: “Per capita income is not very high in our country [as of 1964, per capita income was about $385], The disparities in its distribution determine the imperious necessity to improve living conditions of the people of Spain. As regards functional distribu tion, it is noteworthy that among wage earners 39.3 percent receive 60.9 percent of the national income . . . .” 10 Another discernible advantage of the collective bargaining system has been its contribution to increased productivity. Output per man-hour increased in Spain by about 28 percent during the years 1960 through 1963.11 The World Bank reports “. . . a recent development in the direction of greater flexibility is the widespread usage of col- MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 870 lective bargaining agreements. These make it increasingly possible to relate wages to produc tivity at the plant level.” 12 Other objective measures of the success of the collective bargaining system in improving the lot of the Spanish workers are difficult to construct, and variations in evaluation persist. Some Span ish authorities believe that the improvements that Spanish workers have experienced in recent years are not necessarily a result of the system of col lective bargaining, but may be attributable to other factors. Thus, one Spanish authority observed in 1964 that “ . . . we do not say that the agreement as a method to resolve the labor 12 T he Econom ic D evelopm ent o f Spain,, In te rn a tio n a l B ank fo r R eco nstruction an d D evelopm ent (B altim ore, Jo h n s H opkins P ress, 1963), p. 345. 13 J u lia n A riza Ricoi, op. cit., p. 9. problem is worthless but the experience of the last several years shows that the situation has not improved very much since 1958.” 13 Though the system of collective bargaining has introduced a measure of self-determination within the Spanish labor relations system, when judged on the basis of democratic standards the Spanish system adds up to one of State domination. Shifts of power between government agencies, procedural changes in the area of collective bar gaining, and alterations in the structure of the Spanish Syndical Organization have occurred. However, these modifications have not resulted in the creation of independent labor unions, employer associations, and the right to strike or lockout. —F In Western Europe there are as many different types of labor courts as there are countries, some dealing with individual employment disputes, such as dismissals and the like, others with collective labor relations, others with both. The issue cannot be settled by picking a readymade package off some fashionable foreign shelf, though such experience is of course worth noting, especially in order to remind ourselves that the obvious solution may not be the right one. . . . It is legitimate to pose the question whether the desire to sweep all types of labor dispute before one unified system of labor courts in order to “systematize” industrial relations is little more than the unhelpful approach of an unduly tidy mind. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis —K. W. W edderburn, N e w S o c i e t y , December 9,1965. red W it n e y 871 WAGE DEVELOPMENTS IN MANUFACTURING, 1965 Wage Developments in Manufacturing, 1965 85 p e r c e n t of the 11.4 million production and related workers employed in factories where general wage changes1 are customary received wage increases in 1965. This proportion exceeded the previous high—83 percent—attained in 1959, the earliest year for which information is avail able. The 9.7 million workers affected included 5.8 million of those whose wages were changed by decisions during the year and 3.9 million who received deferred wage increases resulting from decisions in earlier years or cost-of-living escalator increases, or both. Wage increases were generally larger than in the preceding 4 years. Considering only those work A bout 1 G eneral w age changes a re defined as changes affecting 10 p ercen t o r m ore of th e pro duction a n d related w orkers in an estab lish m en t or group of estab lish m en ts th a t b arg ain as a unit. In a d d itio n to th e 11.4 m illion w orkers em ployed in factories t h a t ty p ically change w ages by m eans of general w age changes, 1.8 m illion w ere em ployed w here general w age changes a re not custo m ary . T hese estab lish m en ts typically change pay by m ak ing a d ju stm e n ts fo r in d iv id u al w orkers. T he 11.4 m illion also excludes estab lish m en ts (ab o u t 160,000 w orkers) fo r w hich in fo rm atio n on w age actio n s du rin g 1965 w as n o t available. 2 T his stu d y is lim ited to m a n u fa c tu rin g estab lish m en ts w here gen eral wage ch a rg e s a re custom ary, e ith e r th ro u g h collective b arg ain in g or, in th e case of nonunion firms, th ro u g h u n ila te ra l m an ag em en t decisions. A nonunion estab lish m en t is defined as one w here few er th a n 50 p ercen t of th e p roduction an d related w o rk ers are rep resen ted by unions. T h is a rtic le is based on in fo rm atio n fo r alm ost all union and nonunion estab lish m en ts h av ing 1,000 or m ore production an d re lated w orkers, an d on a sam ple of sm aller union an d nonunion estab lish m en ts. T he d a ta on situ a tio n s involving 1,000 or more w orkers w ere obtain ed p rim a rily from secondary sources, and those on sm aller estab lish m ents, by q u estionnaires m ailed to co o p eratin g firms. F o r p ro ced u ral details, see th e forthcom ing B L S Handbook of M ethods fo r Su rveys and Studies. See also “M ajor W age D evelopm ents, 1965,” M onthly Labor Review, April 1966, pp. 372-376. All p roduction a n d re la te d em ployees in any estab lish m en t or group of estab lish m en ts w ere ta b u la te d according to th e m ean w age change fo r th ese w orkers. T he p ercentage changes th a t a re p resen ted here are expressed as a p ercentage of average e a rn ings ad ju ste d to exclude th e effect of prem ium pay fo r overtim e work. Changes in w age stru c tu re (as opposed to changes in in div id u al em ployee rates) w ere tre a te d as general w age changes, provided m ore th a n 10 p ercen t of th e w orkers w ere affected. Changes in frin g e benefits were ta b u la te d as affecting all w ork ers in a given situ a tio n , even though th e change, such as a re du ction in th e service req u ired fo r an ad d itio n al week of paid vacatio n , m ay n o t have affected all these w orkers im m ediately. Benefit changes a re ta b u la te d fo r th e year in w hich they were decided on, even th o u g h th e change m ay n ot a c tu a lly become effec tiv e u n til la te r years. T h is a rtic le does n o t include d a ta on th e “package co st” of settlem en ts o r m anagem ent decisions— i.e., i t does n ot p resen t d a ta on th e cost of changes in wages an d frin g e benefits. In th e m ail q u estio n n aire, th e p a rtic ip a n ts w ere asked only w h eth er https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ers employed where wages were increased, for example, the median was 3.3 percent (of average straight-time hourly earnings), the highest since the 3.6 percent of 1960. Percentages for interven ing years ranged from 2.7 to 3.1. At least one supplementary benefit was estab lished or improved for 71 percent of the workers employed where wage decisions were made during the year—a proportion larger than that for any year for which information is available.2 Wage Changes About 9.7 million workers were employed in establishments where wage rates were increased during the year; they comprised 85 percent of those employed where general wage changes are customary. Of the 1.76 million who did not receive increases, 617,000 were employed by noneach type of benefit h ad been established, im proved, or discon tinued, ra th e r th a n ab o u t th e n a tu re of th e change in benefits. F o r exam ple, an estab lish m en t w as asked to in d icate only w hether it had im proved vacations, n o t w h a t kind of im provem ents had been m ade. F o r settlem en ts affecting larg e num bers of employees, in fo rm atio n is available on th e type of change in benefits b u t th e cost of these changes is usually n ot known. T hree concepts of w age changes w ere used in th is study. As show n in table 1, they w ere : Total E ffectiv e W age C hanges. T his m easure (first two colum ns) includes all estab lish m en ts t h a t custom arily m ake gen e ra l w age changes, an d show s a ll changes actu ally effective d u r ing th e year. I t show s th e combined effect of w age changes re su ltin g from 1965 decisions, changes in 1965 re su ltin g from e a rlie r decisions, and cost-of-living escalato r ad ju stm en ts. If, fo r exam ple, w orkers received a 6-cent-an-hour w age in crease in 1965 re su ltin g from a 1964 decision (a deferred in crease ), the num ber of w orkers in th e u n it w ere ta b u la te d in th e 6- to 7-cent in te rv a l. If they also received 2 cents in escalato r a d ju stm e n ts d u rin g 1965, they were p u t in th e 8-and-under-9-cent in terv al. In both cases, they w ere en tered in th e p ercen t po rtio n of th e table a t th e equivalent am ount, based on th e average hourly earn in g s in th e establishm ent. W age D ecisions. T h is m easure ( th ird a n d fo u rth colum ns) is intended to show th e effect of c u rre n t econom ic conditions on w age actio n s d u rin g th e year. I t is lim ited to establishm ents w here th e re w ere w age decisions du rin g 1965, e ith e r th ro u g h collective b arg ain in g or th ro u g h u n ila te ra l m anagem ent action. Changes a re lim ited to th o se decided on in 1965 an d becom ing effective w ith in 1 y ear from th e beginning of th e c o n tra c t ; costof-living escalato r a d ju stm e n ts a n d w age ch an g es in 1965 re su ltin g from e a rlie r decisions a re excluded. All nonunion estab lish m en ts a re included since it is n o t possible to determ ine ob jectively if a w age change w as considered d u rin g th e year. Total W age Changes E ffectiv e W here Decisions W ere Made. T h is m easure ( la s t tw o colum ns) supplem ents th e ta b u la tio n of w age decisions by including th e effects of all cost-of-living a d ju s t m ents and any deferred in creases effective in 1965 an d resu ltin g from e a rlie r se ttle m e n ts in those estab lish m en ts w here 1965 w age decisions w ere m ade. F o r exam ple, if w orkers in an estab lish m en t received an im m ediate 6-cent increase resu ltin g from a 1965 se ttle m e n t p lu s 3 c en ts in escalatio n du rin g th e year, they w ere ta b u la te d in th e 6-and-under-7-cent in te rv a l fo r w age deci sions, and on th e 9-and-under-10-cent line in th e la s t two colum ns. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 872 T a b l e 1. G e n e r a l W a g e C h a n g e s f o r P r o d u c t i o n a n d R e l a t e d W o r k e r s i n M a n u f a c t u r i n g , 1965 [Workers in thousands] Total effective wage changes1 Wage decisions 2 Type and amount of wage action Total wage changes effective where decisions were reached3 Work ers Per Work ers cent Per Work Per ers cent cent 11,422 100.0 6,745 100.0 6,745 100.0 No wage changes__________ 31,758 3 Decreases in wages_________ Increases in w ag es----- ------- 9,661 15.4 (6) 84.6 932 3 5,810 13.8 .1 86.1 853 3 5,889 12.6 .1 87.3 87 176 149 646 482 760 374 745 267 386 627 189 81 190 1.3 2.6 2.2 9.6 7.1 9.6 11.3 5.5 11.1 4.0 5.7 9.3 2.8 1.2 2.8 97 173 184 632 461 951 437 1,195 1,050 532 780 208 89 221 1.8 2.4 3.2 10.4 9.4 9.7 8.3 3.8 10.5 9.2 4.7 6.8 1.8 .8 1.9 659 309 780 288 502 719 197 89 189 1.4 2.6 2.7 9.4 6.8 9.0 9.8 4.6 11.6 4.3 7.4 10.7 2.9 1.3 2.8 139 311 524 1,415 1,461 1,304 1,477 996 589 587 247 265 109 78 35 111 1.2 2.7 4.6 12.4 12.8 11.4 12.9 8.7 5.2 5.1 2.2 2.3 1.0 .7 .3 1.0 59 154 223 639 840 721 459 902 494 520 223 243 98 76 34 111 .9 2.3 3.3 9.5 12.5 10.7 6.8 13.4 7.3 7.7 3.3 3.6 1.5 1.1 .5 1.6 70 182 223 562 723 746 534 944 528 559 234 251 98 76 34 111 1.0 2.7 3.3 8.3 10.7 11.1 7.9 14.0 7.8 8.3 3.5 3.7 1.5 1.1 .5 1.6 13 .1 13 .2 13 .2 T o ta l4______________ I n C ents P er H our Tin dp,r 2 2 and under 3______________ 3 and under 4_._ _______ 4 and under 5______________ 5 and under 6--------------------6 and under 7______________ 7 and under 8----- ----------------------8 and under 9---9 and under 10____________ 10 and under 11______ _____ 11 and under 12____________ 12 and under 13____________ 13 and under 15_______ . . _ 15 and under 17____________ 17 and under 19___ _ - _ 19 and over. ______________ Not specified or not nompnteri 7 201 268 363 1,188 1,069 1,108 650 608 I n P ercent Under 1__________________ 1 and under IH -----------------1H and under 2-----------------2 and under 2V i-----------------2Vé and under 3-----------------3 and under 3H-----------------3J4 and under 4________ . 4 and under 4Yi-----------------4H and under 5____________ 5 and under 5H----------------5H and under 6______ _ _ 6 and under 7_____________ 7 and under 8_____________ 8 and under 9------------9 and under 10_______ ___ 10 and over______________ Not specified or not computed 7______________ 1 Includes changes in wage rates negotiated or decided upon, and effective, during 1965; increases effective in 1965 but decided upon in earlier years; and cost-of-living escalator adjustments effective during the year. 2 Excludes changes decided upon in earlier years and cost-of-living escalator adjustments. 3 Changes in wage rates negotiated or decided upon during the year plus cost-of-living escalator adjustments and increases effective in 1965 but decided upon in earlier years in these same establishments. 4 Excludes about 1.8 million workers in establishments reporting that they never make general wage changes, and 160,000 in establishments in which action on wages in 1965 was not known. 5 Includes 875,000 workers in union establishments in which there was either no bargaining on wages or bargaining was not concluded in 1965. 6 Less than 0.05 percent. 7 Insufficient information to compute amount of increase. N o t e : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. union firms that did not raise wages, 315,000 by firms where the 1965 settlements did not provide wage increases during the first contract year, about 675,000 where there was no provision for wage bargaining during the year, and 150,000 where bargaining was not completed by the end of 1965. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Wages were increased for 87 percent of the workers in all union establishments; comparable proportions in the previous 4 years ranged from 73 to 83 percent (table 2). Considering only those establishments where wages were increased, the median was 8.7 cents an hour or 3.2 percent of average hourly earnings excluding premium pay for overtime. Again, both averages exceeded earlier years. Workers in major bargaining units (of at least 1,000 workers employed by one firm or a group of firms) received median increases of 10 cents or 3.7 percent, compared with 7 cents or 2.8 percent for the smaller units. This continued the pattern of earlier years. Major bargaining situations are more prevalent in industries with relatively high levels of wages, such as steel, automobiles, and aerospace, while smaller union establishments are more important in industries with lower levels, such as some food processing, leather products, and furniture. Considering nonunion establishments that raised wages, the median hourly increase was 8 cents or 4 percent, compared with ranges of 6,6 to 7.5 cents and 3.2 to 3.7 percent for the previous 4 years. The cents-per-hour increase was less than in union establishments, but the percent increase wyas higher; average hourly earnings in nonunion es tablishments are usually lower, hence a given centsper-hour increase will be proportionately greater. Of the 6.75 million workers affected by 1965 wage decisions, 5.8 million (86 percent) received increases, 932,000 (13.8 percent) remained at exist ing wage rates, and 3,000 had their wages reduced. The proportion not receiving increases was sub stantially lower than in earlier years. An im portant reason for this was the reduction in the proportion of nonunion workers who did not re ceive increases (25 percent in 1965, compared with the previous years’ range of 31 to 47 percent). In addition, a larger proportion of workers affected by collective bargaining agreements received in creases in 1965 than in earlier years. In 1965, 7 percent of the workers affected by wage settlements did not receive increases. The range for 1960 through 1964 was 20 to 33 percent. The high proportions in 1962 and 1963 can be partly attrib uted to the no-wage-increase settlements in the steel, aluminum, and can industries. The median increase resulting from the 1965 de cisions was 8.8 cents—higher than the figures for WAGE DEVELOPMENTS IN MANUFACTURING, 1965 873 the years 1961-64. About 54 percent of all work ers affected by decisions were employed where in creases averaged between 5 and 11 cents an hour. In major collective bargaining situations, firstyear wage changes resulting from the 1965 deci sions included average hourly increases of 14.1 cents in basic steel; 10 cents for 125,000 employees in the shirt, pajama, cotton garment, and outerwear industries; 15 cents for cement workers; 12 cents for employees of Milwaukee breweries; 12y2 cents for employees in the men’s and boys’ coat and suit industry; and 13y2 cents in the aluminum in dustry. In the aerospace industry, almost all of the agreements provided first-year increases of 8 cents an hour, and in the paper industry most set tlements provided 12 or 10 cents an hour. In the rubber industry, increases in most tire plants aver aged 7 cents and in most nontire plants, 6 to 7 cents. The median negotiated increase was 3.7 per cent—4 percent in nonunion establishments, 3.6 percent in all union firms, and 4.1 percent in major union firms considered separately. All of these were higher than comparable figures in previous years. About 43 percent of all workers affected by wage decisions received increases averaging be tween 2i/2 and 4i/2 percent. In 1964, only 33 per cent received increases of this size and 31 percent received less than 2 ^ percent (compared with only 16 percent in 1965). Among the 1965 increases was a raise of about 5 percent in southern textiles (largely unorga nized) and in New England textiles (organized) ; an average of nearly 3 percent at most of the large aerospace companies; increases averaging more than 4 percent in basic steel; 5 percent in the shirt, pajama, cotton garment, and outerwear industries; T a b l e 2. T otal E f f e c t iv e G eneral W age E C h a n g e s 1 f o r P r o d u c t io n s t a b l is h m e n t , 1961-65 1965 1964 Type and amount of wage action and R elated 1963 W orkers by 1962 type of 1961 Percent of workers by type of establishment All Un Other ion 2 All Un Other ion 2 AH Un Other ion 2 All Un Other ion 2 All Un Other ion 2 Manufacturing establishments with gen eral wage change policies 1____ ________ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 No wage changes 3....................... ........ .......... Decreases in wages____________________ Increases in wages 6________________ 15.4 0 84.6 12.7 0 87.3 24.6 28.6 0 71.4 23.9 .1 76.1 43.8 24.1 .2 75.8 22.0 .2 77.8 30.2 .2 69.6 31.7 27.1 47.1 23.7 16.6 45.6 68.1 72.8 52.9 76.1 83.3 54.0 1.8 5. Ò 19.8 18. 0 14. 3 13.9 6.8 1.8 .8 1. 9 1.8 6.0 18.7 17.6 15.2 16.2 7.9 1.9 .7 1.3 1.6 4..0 23.4 19.6 11.1 5.8 3.2 1.7 1.0 4.0 3.0 9.2 23.2 18.0 11.2 3.7 1.2 .9 .2 .6 .2 2.9 10.8 25.2 17.7 11.6 4.3 1.5 1.0 .2 .6 .1 3.2 3.8 16.8 18.9 9.6 1.9 .6 .3 2.1 7.0 18.4 19.5 18.3 2.7 1.9 2.0 2.5 1.3 2.2 7.8 17.6 19.0 20.8 2.6 1.3 1.8 3.3 1.3 1.9 4.4 20.8 21.1 10.7 2.9 3.8 2.4 .1 1.5 2.0 5.9 21.0 17.8 15.3 2.5 1.3 1.4 .2 .5 2.1 6.2 21.0 19.4 17.7 2.7 1.3 1.4 .3 .5 1.8 5.0 21.4 12.5 7.4 1.9 1.3 1.0 .1 .6 5.3 6.8 22.5 15.9 15.0 4.8 2.3 2.1 .4 .4 5.4 7.6 24.4 16.9 17.5 5.8 2.6 1.5 .4 .5 5.1 4. 5 16.3 12.8 7.1 1.7 1.6 3.8 .5 .2 1.2 7.3 25. 2 24. 3 13. 9 7.3 2.3 1. 0 .7 .3 1.0 .1 1.4 8.2 28.2 26. 2 13.9 5.1 2. 2 .7 .5 .2 .5 .1 .7 4.1 14.8 17.8 13.9 14.7 2.6 1.8 1.3 .7 2.7 .1 2.2 14.8 22.9 19.5 5.5 4.8 .6 .6 .2 (4) .1 .2 2.2 18.3 25.7 20.1 4.4 3.9 .6 .4 .2 (4) .1 .1 2.3 3.4 13.7 17.6 9.0 7.9 .6 1.0 .1 1.3 7.2 24.7 23.1 6.0 5.9 3.0 1.2 1.0 1.7 .7 1.5 8.4 27.2 25.2 5.2 3.9 2.8 .9 .4 2.1 .3 .9 3.4 17.3 16.7 8.2 12.2 3.6 2.1 3.0 .3 2.0 1.3 6.9 24.6 24.6 o. 8 2.9 1.0 .4 .1 (4) .2 .1 1.4 7.3 27.0 27.5 5.1 2.6 .9 .5 .2 .1 (4) .2 .7 5.6 16.5 15.2 8.2 4.1 1.3 .4 .1 3.7 7.1 22.9 25.2 7.7 5.2 1.4 .4 .3 1 1.6 6 3.8 8.1 27.0 27.9 8.2 5.3 1.4 .3 .2 J2 .3 7 3.6 3.5 10.4 17.2 5.9 4.3 1.4 .7 .7 1 5.7 Total number of workers (in thousands)... 11,422 8,844 2,578 10,944 8,361 2,584 10,941 8, 212 2,729 10,902 8,352 2,549 10,512 7,945 2,567 75.4 56.2 I n C ents P er H our Under 3____________________________ 3 and under 5______________ ~ 5 and under 7______________________ " 7 and under 9__ ) 9 and under 11___ __________________ 11 and under 13______________________~ 13 and under 15__________________ 15 and under 17____ _______________ 17 and under 19____________________ 19 and over________________________ Not specified or not computed 3_________ .6 .6 I n P ercent Under 1____________________________ 1 and under 2_____________________ 2 and under 3_____________________ 3 and under 4___________________~ 4 and under 5__________________ 5 and under 6_____________________ 6 and under 7____________________21 7 and under 8___________________ 8 and under 9__________________ 222 9 and under 10__________________ 10 and over____________________ 2IIII2I Not specified or not computed _________ Includes all establishments that have a policy of making general wai c£an5®s’ including those in which the only general wage changes put in eilect during the year were cost-of-living escalator adjustments or increas decided upon in earlier years, as well as union establishments in which the was either no bargaining on wages in any of the 5 years or bargaining w: not concluded. Workers in establishments reporting that they never mal general wage changes axe excluded from this total. The numbers exclude in millions, were 1.8 in 1965, 1.7 in 1964, 1.6 in both 1963 and 1962, and 1 in lyoi. 3 Establishments in which a majority of the production and related worke were covered by union agreements. 3 D ata on which percentages are based include workers in union establis ments m which there was no bargaining on wages or bargaining was n< https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis .2 .6 .8 concluded, as follows: 875,000 in 1965; 1,652,000 in 1964; 961,000 in 1963; 1,200,000 in 1962; and 948,000 in 1961. 4 Less than 0.05 percent. 5 In the case of union establishments, includes negotiated increases sched uled to go into effect during the 12-month period following the effective date of the agreement, and other adjustments (deferred and cost-of-living escalator adjustments) effective during the calendar year. In other estab lishments, includes increases effective in the calendar year. 6 Insufficient information to compute amount of increase. N ote; Because of rounding, sums of individual items m ay not equal totals. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 874 and 4.5 percent for both union and nonunion em ployees in petroleum refining. About 79,000 workers whose wages were not changed by the 1965 settlements did receive costof-living escalator increases, as did 390,000 of those whose wages were raised as a result of the 1965 wage decisions. These escalator increases ranged from 1 to 5 cents an hour. In major aerospace companies, for example, the typical 4-cent adjust ment, added to the 8-cent negotiated increase, re sulted in a 12-cent hourly increase in wages during the year. Nonuniform Wage Adjustments. Of those re ceiving increases in 1965,3.9 million, or 40 percent, were employed where skilled workers received larger cents-per-hour increases than those with lower skills. This number included 2.8 million workers who received percentage or bracket inT a b l e 3. C hanges in Su pple m e n t a r y B e n e f it tic e s fo r P roduction a nd R el a t e d W o r k e r s in u f a c t u r i n g by T y p e of E s t a b l i s h m e n t , 1965 P rac M an [Workers in thousands] Supplementary benefits T o ta l2________ - _ Not changing supplementary benefits,. _ _ _ _ ____ Reducing supplementary benefits,. Liberalizing or establishing at least 1 supplementary __ benefit4_______ _ Premium pay _________ Shift differentials __ _____ Paid holidays ____,,_ Paid vacations . , _ ___ Pensions5. , , ___ Health and welfare plans 6._, Severance pay 6_. _______ Supplementary unemploym ents benefits 5_______ Jury duty pay____________ Paid funeral leave________ Paid sick leave___ _ _ , . Other benefits.. All Union estab Other estab lishments establishments lishments 1 Work ers Per Work Per Work Per ers ers cent cent cent 11,582 100.0 8,951 100.0 2,631 100.0 6,633 57.3 5,244 58.6 1,389 52.8 3 .1 3 (3) 4,945 376 507 2, 093 2,773 2,595 3,576 437 42.7 3.2 4.4 18.1 23.9 22.4 30.9 3.8 3,707 311 429 1,673 2, 393 2,244 2,923 399 41.4 3.5 4.8 18.7 26.7 25.1 32.7 4.5 1,238 64 78 420 380 351 653 39 47.1 2.4 3.0 16.0 14.4 13.3 24.8 1.5 300 503 484 271 863 2.6 4.3 4.2 2.3 7.5 298 474 469 262 792 3.3 5.3 5.2 2.9 8.8 2 29 14 9 71 .1 1.1 .5 .4 2.7 1 Establishments in which a majority of the production and related workers were covered by union agreements. 2 Includes employment only in establishments that have a policy of making general wage changes, including those in which the only general wage changes put into effect during the year were cost-of-living escalator adjustments or increases decided upon in earlier years, as well as union establishments in which there was either no bargaining on wages or bargaining was not conclud ed in 1965. Included also are 160,000 workers in establishments in which action on wages or supplementary practices was not known. 3 Less than 0.05 percent. 4 The totals in this group are smaller than the sums of individual items since some actions affected more items than 1. Includes 27,000 workers in union and 6,000 in nonunion establishments in which some supplementary benefits were liberalized and others were reduced. 5 Includes actions in which contributions were increased to maintain exist ing benefits and excludes actions increasing benefits without raising employer contributions. 6 Includes 109,000 aerospace workeis employed where extended layoff ben efit plans were improved and savings investment plans were established. N ote : Because of rounding, sums of individual items may not equal totals. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis creases. Thus, automobile, automotive parts, and farm and construction machinery workers received annual improvement factor increases of 2.5 per cent, with a minimum increase of 6 cents an hour. Petroleum workers received 4.5 percent negotiated increases; and most southern and New England textile workers received 5-percent adjustments. In steel, all workers were granted 10 cents an hour plus a 0.3-cent addition to the increment between each of the 31 labor grades; the resultant overall increase ranged from 10 cents for the lowest rated employees to 19 cents for the highest rated. At the major producers, this averaged 12.1 cents. In addition, some skilled workers were raised two grades, resulting in an additional 14.6-cent in crease for those affected, or about 2 cents if aver aged over all workers. The overall average change was 14.1 cents (12.1 cents plus 2 cents). About 288,000 workers were employed in plants where skilled workers received increases in addi tion to uniform cents-per-hour adjustments. About 1.6 million workers were in factories where other nonuniform wage increases were put into effect. About 42,000 workers, all but 8,000 of them in union establishments, were employed where wage adjustments were made to eliminate or re duce differentials between plants or areas, or be tween men and women. Cost-of-Living Adjustments. At the end of 1965, wages of about 1.75 million workers (about as many as a year earlier) were subject to auto matic adjustment based on price indexes. About 93 percent of these workers were in union estab lishments. More than 80 percent of those under wage esca lation were covered by provisions for reviews every 3 months. The next most frequent interval was twice a year, affecting more than 150,000 workers (more than half of them in meatpacking). The rest of the workers were employed where reviews were made at other intervals, such as monthly or annual, or where the first adjustment under the clause was to be made in future years. Absolute limits on the amount of escalator in creases were in effect in establishments employing about 100,000 workers. Some aerospace agree ments, for example, limit the yearly increase to 3 cents an hour. Most escalator adjustments during the year were 4 cents, compared with 3 or 4 cents in 1964. 875 WAGE DEVELOPMENTS IN MANUFACTURING, 1965 Supplementary Benefits About two-fifths of the factory production workers were employed where at least one supple mentary benefit was established or improved (table 3).3 In earlier years, the corresponding propor tion was about 35 percent. For the first time, sup plementary benefit changes were more frequent in nonunion than in union establishments (47 and 41 percent). One of the causes of this shift was the fact that the southern textile industry, largely nonunion, libesralized fringe benefits in addition to increasing wages. In most years, southern tex tile mills changed wage rates but did not increase benefits. Another reason was that many of the key collective bargaining contracts were not nego tiated during the year; although the workers cov ered by these agreements received deferred wage increases, there were no negotiations to liberalize supplementary benefits. As in each of the previous 3 years, the most fre quently improved benefits were health and welfare, vacations, pensions, and holidays. Almost all of the aerospace ¡settlements made some improvements in health and welfare benefits, most frequently in life insurance, followed by improvements in hospi3 About 71 p ercen t of th e 6.75 m illion w orkers em ployed w here w age decisions w ere m ade du rin g 1965 h ad a t le a st one benefit established o r im proved, exceeding th e 51 to 60 p e rcen t range fo r th e 6 p rio r years. 4 Discussion of detailed changes in supplementary benefits must be lim ited to the major collective bargaining situations because pertinent data are not available for the nonunion and small union establishm ents. T a b l e 4. P ercentag e of tal or surgical benefits, or both, in sickness and ac cident benefits or combinations of the foregoing. Companies frequently also assumed an increased proportion of the cost of insurance benefits. Changes in health and welfare benefits affected about 3 out of 10 workers—in each of the years 1962 through 1964, the proportion was 1 out of 4 (table 3). Health and welfare benefits were im proved in a number of important industries.4 In the steel, aluminum, and can industries, improve ments typically included extension of hospitaliza tion coverage to 2 years for workers laid off after 10 years’ service. (It remained at 1 year for em ployees with shorter service.) Surgical, anes thetic, and obstetrical charges were also converted from a set fee schedule to a prevailing fee basis. In both the aluminum and steel industries, the duration of sickness and accident benefits was in creased to 2 years for workers with 2 years’ serv ice (remaining at 1 year for those with shorter service), and the weekly payment was increased to 70 percent (from 60 percent) of gross earnings in aluminum and to an average $80 in steel, from $67.50. The can industry settlements merged the existing sickness and accident insurance and sup plemental unemployment benefits (SUB) plans to provide a “job and income security program.” In addition to improvements in sickness and accident benefits similar to those in the aluminum industry, the new plan increased SUB plus State unemploy ment compensation benefits to 70 percent (from 60 percent) of weekly earnings. I t also increased P r o d u c t io n and R e l a t e d W o r k e r s A f f e c t e d M e d ia n W a g e C h a n g e s , 1959-65 by G en e r a l W age I n crea ses, and [In percent] Establishments making wage decisions in— Item Workers receiving wage increases: All manufacturing___________________________ _____ _ All union f irm s _____ _ . . _________ . _______ Major union firms3____________________________ Nonunion Aims. ___________________ _____ _______ Median adjustm ents:3 All manufacturine___________ . . . _ _ __________ ____ All union firms___ _______ _______________________ Major union firms 2_____________ ____________ _ Nonunion firms__________________________________ Median increases:4 All m anufacturing.___ ___ ________ __________________ All union firms______________ ___________________ Major union firms 2______ ___________________ . Nonunion firms__________________ . . . ___________ 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 86.1 92.5 94.2 75.3 76.0 89.3 94.9 55.5 74.0 77.3 70.7 69.2 66.8 74.4 65.4 53.2 76.0 89.5 89.5 52.8 79.6 93.1 93.0 56.8 84.0 93.7 95.1 66.5 84.6 87.3 39.8 75.4 71.4 76.1 71.6 56.2 75 8 77.8 74.4 69.6 68.1 72.8 68.2 52.9 76.1 83.3 83.0 54.0 80.1 87.1 86.2 59.0 82.7 87.0 87.6 68.6 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.2 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.5 2.4 1.6 2.4 2.5 2.4 1.2 3.1 3.4 3.2 2.2 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.2 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.6 1.6 2.5 2.7 2.7 1.0 3.2 3.4 3.2 2.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.7 3.6 4.1 4.0 2.7 2.5 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.6 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 4.4 3.3 3.2 3.7 4.0 2.7 2.6 2.6 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.7 4.3 1Includes cost-of-living escalator increases and deferred wage changes re sulting from decisions reached in earlier years, as well as changes decided on in the current year. 2 Agreements affecting 1,000 workers or more. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Establishments where wage changes were effective 1in— 1959 3 Includes employees in establishments in which wage rates were not changed or were reduced. 4 Limited to employees in establishments in which wage rates were in creased. 876 the payment duration to 2 years for employees with 2 years’ service and to 5 years for those with 10 years’ service. The previous 1-year duration continued for employees with shorter service. Settlements in the aerospace industry also made improvements in health and welfare benefits. The most frequent changes included increasing the duration (usually to 365 days, from 120) and daily payment for hospital confinements, increased major medical coverage, and company assumption of a larger share of insurance costs. At some com panies, employees represented by the United Auto mobile Workers benefited from the establishment of bridge and transition benefits5 similar to those the union negotiated in 1964 with the major auto mobile producers. Some settlements provided for the integration of insurance benefits with the Fed eral Medicare benefits that went into effect Julv 1, 1966. Settlements for 125,000 employees of shirt and pajama, cotton garment, and outerwear firms in creased hospital daily room allowances and mis cellaneous hospital expenses for employees and dependents. The improvements were financed by a ^-percent increase in company contributions to the health and welfare and retirement funds. (Part of the rise was to be used to finance pension improvements.) Paid vacations were improved in establishments employing 1 out of 4 manufacturing workers, com pared with 1 out of 5 in 1964. Most aerospace settlements added a fourth week of vacation after 20 years’ service or lowered the service requirement for 4 weeks to 20 years, from 25. Some of these settlements also reduced the service required for shorter vacations. In the glass industry, settle ments for 50,000 workers added a fourth week after 20 years. In rubber, a fifth week was added for 25-year employees and the service requirement for 4 weeks was lowered to 15 years, from 22. In https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 Milwaukee, employees of three large breweries gained a seventh week of vacation after 25 years and an eleventh holiday. Pensions were improved in factories employing 22 percent of all the workers covered by the study, compared with 18 percent in 1964. In the steel industry, the minimum normal monthly pension for each year of credited service was increased to $5, from $2.50 and $2.60, beginning July 1, 1966; pensions of those retired prior to that date were to be increased $15 a month. Provision was made for retirement at an unreduced rate after 30 years’ service, and a $75-a-month supplement was added for workers terminated because of plant shut downs, extended layoffs, or disability, payable until the terminated employee becomes eligible for unreduced social security benefits. The settlement in the shirt, pajama, cotton garment, and outer wear industries increased the normal monthly pension to $55 (from $50). Paid holidays were improved for 18 percent of all production and related workers in manufactur ing—almost the same proportion as in 1964. Among the industries where holidays were added were rubber (a ninth), aerospace (a ninth or an eighth and a ninth), glass (an eighth), and the cement industry (a ninth). In the southern tex tile industry, several large nonunion firms estab lished 2 paid holidays (previously they had none). Some other union and nonunion textile firms added a holiday, resulting in schedules ranging from 2 to 9 days a year. — G eorge E u b e n Division of Wage Economics BBridge benefits, usually $100 a month, are paid to eligible widows of deceased employees until they remarry or become eligible for social security benefits. T ransition benefits, also $100 a month, are paid for 24 months to survivors of employees and of some disabled retirees who died while covered by life insurance. WAGES AND HOURS, 1962 AND 1965 Retail Trade—II Wages and Hours, 1962 and 1965 1965 survey 1 of the earnings and hours of work of nonsupervisory personnel in retail trade revealed that earnings had increased while hours of work had declined since the pre vious study in June 1962. A comparative analysis of the studies provides greater detail on these changes. T h e B u r e a u ’s J u n e Wage Improvements Average hourly earnings of retail trade em ployees had increased 18 cents from the $1.67 aver age of June 1962, advancing at the average rate of 3.5 percent a year (table 1). During the 3 years between surveys the number of nonsupervisory em ployees increased by more than 560,000. Employees throughout the wage distribution en joyed increases in earnings, although changes, ex cept at the lowest pay levels, were greater at the lower than at the upper end of the pay scale. The proportion of employees earning less than $1 an hour declined from close to a tenth to about a twentieth, but an even more significant change took place immediately above this earnings level. Nearly an eighth of the employees earned between $1 and $1.05 in 1962, whereas fewer than a twen tieth had such earnings in 1965. Much of the con centration at the $1 to $1.05 level in 1962 was at tributable to the Federal minimum wage of $1 an hour which applied to most employees in large re tail enterprises. In 1965, however, when the Fed eral minimum for such employees was $1.15 an hour, there was no great concentration of employ ees at this pay level. There were, however, nearly an eighth of the employees clustered at or just above $1.25 an hour, which in September 1965 was to be the new Federal minimum wage applicable to retail trade employees covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act. The decline in the pro portion of employees earning less than $1.25 an hour from more than a third to less than a fifth was the most notable change in the distribution during the 3-year period. Other changes of note were the 11-cent-an-hour increase (from $1.43 to https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 877 $1.54) in median earnings and the increase (from a fourth to three-tenths) in the proportion of workers earning $2 an hour or more. The average hourly pay level advanced by 15 cents in the Northeast, 16 cents in the South, and 18 cents in the North Central region and in the West. In absolute terms, the interregional pay differential was thus widened. Changes in the earnings distributions were most apparent in the portion of the wage scale between $1 and $1.30, but employees at all pay levels experienced increases in average hourly earnings during the period be tween the surveys. Employees in enterprises with $1 million or more in annual sales had a 19-cent-an-hour increase in average hourly earnings, from $1.80 in 1962.2 This served to increase their earn ings advantage over those in smaller enter prises whose pay level advanced by only 16 cents, from $1.55. In the enterprise group with higher sales volume, changes in the level and dis tribution of earnings primarily reflected changes in establishments with $250,000 or more in annual sales, where about nine-tenths of the enterprise employees worked. Except for those at automobile and farm equipment dealers and in food service occupations, employees in these establishments were generally within the purview of the Fair Labor Standards Act. While a fifth of the em ployees in these establishments earned less than $1.15 an hour in June 1962, almost all earned at least that amount in June 1965, when it was the minimum wage applied to covered retail establish ments. The decline in the proportion of employees paid less than $1.25 an hour was even more notice able in these establishments—from almost threetenths to fewer than an eighth—and the proportion earning between $1.25 and $1.30 doubled from a twentieth to a tenth. Earnings of higher paid employees also advanced, but not nearly as much as those of lower paid employees. Overall, average earnings for employees in these establishments increased by 19 cents an hour. Factors other than the Federal minimum wage legislation were bringing about changes in the 1 The findings of the survey were reported in the July issue, pp. 754-759. 2 In 1962, data were tabulated separately for enterprises with annual sales of $1 million or more and those w ith less than $1 million and, in each enterprise, for establishm ents with $250,000 or more and less than $250,000 in sales. The analysis of change is therefore lim ited to these groups. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 878 wage structure of retail trade during the 1962-65 period. This is evident from the changes which took place in the level and distribution of earnings of employees who, for the most part, were not within the scope of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Advances of 8 to 18 cents in average hourly earn ings were registered for employees of each of the three remaining enterprise and establishment sales-size classes that generally were not covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act. Reduction in the proportions of employees earning less than $1.15 and less than $1.25 an hour was substantial, although not as great as for employees in estab lishments generally subject to the act. Increases in the proportions of employees in the higher T a b l e 1. reaches of the pay scale were roughly the same in both establishment groups which were part of the low volume enterprise class as in establishments with $250,000 or more in sales which were part of the $l-million-or-more enterprise group. In es tablishments with less than $250,000 in sales which were part of $1 million or more enterprises there was almost no change in the proportion of higher paid employees. Increases in average hourly earnings for em ployees of each major industry group ranged from 13 cents for those in miscellaneous stores to 25 cents for those at automotive dealers and gasoline serv ice stations. The pay level in four major groups increased by 18 to 20 cents an hour. A v e r a g e H o u r l y E a r n in g s a n d P e r c e n t o f N o n s u p e r v is o r y E m p l o y e e s in R e t a il T r a d e 1 w it h S p e c if ie d A v e r a g e H o u r l y E a r n in g s , S e l e c t e d C h a r a c t e r is t ic s , J u n e 1962 a n d J u n e 1965 Average hourly earnings 3 Characteristics Percent of employees earning - Less than $1.15 $1.15 and less than $1.20 Less than $1.25 $1.25 and less than $1.30 Less than $1.50 Less than $2 $3 or more 1962 1965 1962 1965 1962 1965 1962 1965 1962 1965 1962 1965 1962 1965 United States_________ __________________ _ $1.67 $1.85 27.2 N ortheast3 ______ _ ____ . _______ ___ 1.80 1.95 15.6 South 3_____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ 1.38 1.54 45.3 North Central 3_ __ __ ____________________ 1.67 1.85 27.9 W est3___________________________________ 2.04 2.22 11.3 Enterprises with $1 million or more in annual sales 4_ 1.80 1.99 21.6 Establishments with $250,000 or more in annual sales4____ _ __ __ __ _ _ _____ 1.83 2. 02 19.6 Establishments with less than $250,000 in annual sales4_____ _ _ _ __ _ _____ 1.47 1.55 41.8 Enterprises with less than $1 million in annual sales 4_ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _________ 1.55 1.71 32.9 Establishments with $250,000 or more in annual sales 4______ _ __ __________ _______ 1.73 1.91 22.5 Establishments with less than $250,000 in annual sales 4__ _ _ _ _ _ _____________ _ _ 1.44 1.58 38.9 12.1 4.6 24.4 12.1 3.7 4.0 4.6 5.9 5.0 3.8 2.9 5.2 5.3 2.6 10.0 5.4 1.8 7.5 34.4 24.5 53.1 34.6 15.6 29.9 19.3 8.3 37.6 19.8 6.0 13.8 7.5 7.8 6.3 7.9 8.3 5.8 11.6 14.9 11.9 11.5 6.0 10.5 53.0 44.9 70.1 53.6 33.3 48.1 44.4 38.1 62.4 44.9 24.1 40.3 75.2 71.2 86.9 75.9 58.6 71.0 69.8 66.3 82.4 70.6 53.6 65.4 5.6 5. 5 2.9 5.1 11.9 6.3 9.3 9.0 4.4 8.3 19.1 11.4 12.0 June June 1962 1965 2.3 5.2 7.5 28.0 12.1 5.7 10.4 46.4 38.5 69.8 64.0 6.6 24.7 5.0 7.7 49.9 35.4 6.7 12.1 66.2 64.3 82.8 83.6 3.1 3.6 20.5 3.9 3.0 38.9 25.0 9.2 12.6 57.9 48.5 79.4 74.3 4.9 7.2 11.8 4.1 3.6 28.9 16.8 7.2 10.5 47.4 39.0 72.2 65.6 7.0 10.7 25.9 3.8 2.6 44.7 30.1 10.4 13.9 64.0 54.4 83.7 79.6 3.7 5.0 M a jo r I n d u s t r y G r o u ps Building materials, hardware, and farm equipment dealers____ _________ _ __ _____ General merchandise stores.__ _____ _ _ ___ _ Food stores_____ _ __ __ __ ___ _ _ __ _ Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations ___ Apparel and accessory stores _. _____ _ ____ Furniture, home furnishings, and household applianee stores.__ __ _____ _____________ __ Miscellaneous retail stores.. _ _____ 1.79 1.49 1.73 1.77 1.51 1.98 1.63 1.91 2.02 1.70 15.1 33.8 26.0 23.4 32.5 6.8 9.4 12.5 13.7 12.6 3.8 7.3 2.9 3.0 5.2 1.8 9.8 5.6 1.5 7.7 21.4 45.3 30.9 28.4 41.3 9.7 22.6 19.8 16.2 22.2 7.0 7.3 5.8 8.0 9.3 10.0 13.5 10.7 9.0 13.0 39.4 66.8 45.8 46.7 63.1 30.4 57.0 41.3 35.6 50.3 67.9 85.8 67.7 70.7 83.9 59.6 82.3 63.0 62.2 77.2 7.5 3.0 4.9 8.4 3.0 12.9 4.1 11.6 13.7 4. 6 1.90 1.62 2.10 1.75 16.1 30.4 7.9 18.3 3.0 5.1 1.8 3.5 20.7 37.4 10.7 23.6 7.2 8.6 9.4 13.5 37.8 55.8 29.4 47.7 64.3 76.9 57.9 73.2 10.2 6. 0 14.8 8.1 1.61 1.13 1.75 2.13 1.34 1.75 1.35 1.74 1.91 1.83 1.45 1.75 22.0 1.31 65.2 1.93 25.1 2.40 13.3 1.52 38.0 1.92 21.7 1.55 37.6 1.84 24.8 2.10 16.7 2. 09 16.7 1.56 46.9 2.0 21.5 10.9 8.0 23.4 8.4 15.6 11.4 8.0 7.1 28.9 7.5 8.2 2.6 1.9 3.3 3.4 6.2 3.8 3.0 2.6 4.5 8.3 17.5 6.1 1.0 2.1 4.2 10.4 5.5 2.2 1.4 6.1 34.2 77.4 29.6 16.9 43.4 27.0 47.1 31.6 21.1 21.3 53.6 12.8 47.4 18.7 9.9 26.6 13.9 28.7 19.1 11.3 9.2 37.6 7.8 6.3 5.2 4.1 13.6 9.6 9.6 6.9 7.0 7.4 8.4 14.7 15.4 9.8 5.0 13.7 12.0 13.3 9.2 10.0 8.9 15.0 59.3 91.4 44.1 30.1 68.0 45.7 72.6 48.7 38.3 38.6 69.8 49.9 83.0 39.2 22.5 54.5 36.2 58.7 42.5 30.6 26.6 63.1 82.8 97.9 66.8 55.2 88.6 70.7 92.1 71.4 64.4 67.0 82.7 78.4 95.2 61.0 45.5 83.4 64.7 84.5 69. 5 58.9 54. 7 81.6 3.9 0. 2 4.5 15.1 1.7 5.8 1. 0 5.6 11.8 7.4 7.4 5.2 0. 5 12. 0 23.4 2. 5 8.8 2.7 6.8 16.1 13.2 7.4 S elected I n d u st r y G r o u ps D epartm entstores_____ _____ _______ __ ___ Limited price variety stores____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Grocery stores_________ _ ___ ______ _ Motor vehicle dealers_____ ___________ _____ Gasoline service stations_____ _ ____ ______ Men’s and boys’ clothing and furnishings stores. __ Women’s ready-to-wear stores_____ __ ______ Shoe stores... _____ _ __ __ ___________ _ __ Furniture, home furnishings, and equipment stores. Household appliance stores_____ '._____ ____ Drug and proprietary stores.. _. _ _____ __ _ .. 1 Excludes eating and drinking places. 1 Excludes premium pay for overtime and for work on weekends, holidays, and late shifts, 3 The regions used in this study include: Northeast—Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; South—Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; North Central—Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michi gan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; and West—Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. 4 Excludes excise taxes at the retail level. WAGES AND HOURS, 1962 AND 1965 T a b l e 2. 879 A v e r a g e W e e k l y H o u r s a n d P e r c e n t o f N o n s u p e r v is o r y E m p l o y e e s i n R e t a il T r a d e 1 W S p e c i f i e d W e e k l y H o u r s , S e l e c t e d C h a r a c t e r is t ic s , J u n e 1962 a n d J u n e 1965 o r k in g Percent of employees working— hours Characteristics Under 35 hours 1962 United States.. _______ ___________ ___ N ortheast2______________________________ South 2______ _______ ____________ North C entral2________ . _____ W est2___ _____ _________ Enterprises with $1 million or more in annual sales 3 Establishments with $250,000 or more in annual sales3. . ________ ______ ___________ Establishments with less than $250,000 in annual sales 3_____________________________ Enterprises with less than $1 million in annual sales3. . ___ _ . _______ Establishments with $250,000 or more in annual sales3______ _________ __________ . Establishments with less than $250,000 in annual sales 3________________ __ _______ 37.8 35.6 40.5 37.5 37.2 36.3 1965 36.9 34.4 39.6 36.3 37.0 35.7 1962 1965 27.1 31.7 20.9 29.0 27.0 28.3 40 hours 1962 29.9 36.1 22.6 33.0 27.8 30.9 24.9 25.7 21.2 23.6 32.8 30.7 Over 40 and under 48 hours 1965 24.9 24.6 21.4 22.9 33.8 28.3 1962 17.0 15.7 20.4 16.7 13.5 17.1 1965 16.3 13.7 20.3 16.5 13.4 16.0 48 hours and over 1962 21.9 13.9 30.0 22.0 19.8 12.4 1965 18.9 12.5 26.7 17.9 17.8 11.6 36.3 35.8 27.8 30.4 32.0 28.9 17.1 16.3 11.3 10.9 35.9 35.1 33.8 37.0 17.2 21.2 17.6 12.5 23.4 20.3 39.4 38.0 25.9 29.0 19.0 21.3 17.1 16.5 31.3 26.5 40.8 39.6 19.5 22.3 19.2 23.7 22.7 20.8 31.2 26.3 38.5 37.1 29.6 33.1 18.9 19.8 13.7 13.9 31.4 26.6 43.1 34.5 35.3 44.1 34.8 42.3 34.0 34.3 42.8 33.8 13.7 32.4 36.2 15.2 32.2 14.6 34.4 40.4 17.0 35.8 18.9 33.0 27.0 13.4 25.5 23.2 30.0 25.0 15.6 25.7 25.5 11.9 13.9 23.1 15.7 24.2 10.6 13.0 24.9 13.2 37.6 6.8 16.4 44.9 12.0 33.5 6.3 15.0 38.5 9.7 40.1 37.1 38.9 35.9 16.2 28.9 19.3 32.7 29.4 24.3 31.2 25.8 21.9 17.1 21.9 15.0 24.4 21.6 20.2 18.1 34.4 32.3 35.4 44.8 43.3 37.4 34.0 34.3 40.1 40.7 34.6 33.6 31.7 34.3 43.7 41.6 36.7 32.6 33.8 39.0 39.8 33.4 31.4 40.3 36.0 6.1 26.8 25.9 33.6 35.0 16.3 16.2 37.9 34.5 42.4 40.7 7.8 30.0 28.6 39.5 36.5 18.7 17.4 41.8 38.1 25.2 27.1 15.5 9.8 22.7 26.8 21.7 32.1 21.5 21.3 33.6 22.1 24.8 17.5 11.3 24.7 25.6 21.0 30.3 33.1 21.7 10.6 8.1 14.5 38.4 6.7 20.0 14.9 17.0 21.0 25.4 14.5 9.6 9.7 13.9 39.0 7.9 18.6 10.2 17.9 22.7 22.8 13.7 3.7 5.9 16.2 36.4 54.0 22.0 4.9 19.7 23.6 28.3 17.8 2.9 3.7 14.2 31.9 46.7 20.0 M a jo r I n d u s t r y G r o u p s Building materials, hardware, and farm equipment dealers... _ _ ______ _______ General merchandise stores — _______ .. Food stores___ ______ .... _ ____ Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations.. Apparel and accessory stores_____ . . . . ___ Furniture, home furnishings, and household appliance stores___ _____ _ _ . ____ _ Miscellaneous retail stores________ __________ S elected I n d u st r y G r o u ps Department stores.. . ______ ____________ Limited price variety stores_______ _ _____ Grocery stores___________ ________ . . Me tor vehicle dealers. _______ _ _ ________ Gasoline service stations____ _________ ___ M en’s and boys’ clothing and furnishings stores... Women’s ready-to-wear stores.. ____________ Shoe stores.. . . . . Furniture, home furnishings, and equipment stores. Household appliance stores_____________ Drug and proprietary stores____________________ 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 See footnote 3, table 1. Among the 11 industry groups selected for study, employee average hourly earnings increased from 10 cents in shoe stores to 27 cents at motor vehicle dealers. Among six groups, the increase in the pay level was within 2 cents an hour of the all retail trade increase. Decreases in the pro portions of employees paid less than $1.15 took place in each group, and in some (notably limited price variety stores, and to a lesser extent women’s ready-to-wear stores and department stores) this decrease was substantial. Similarly, rather sharp declines in the proportion of employees paid less than $1.25 an hour occurred in each group, al though generally these declines were smaller than those noted below $1.15. In each group, the pro portion of employees paid $1.50 or more an hour increased, but the changes at this and higher pay levels were usually smaller than at low pay levels. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 3 .9 16.5 19.7 23.0 13.8 3 See footnote 4, table 1. Shorter Hours Retail trade employees worked nearly 1 hour a week less in 1965 than in 1962: during the 3-year period, the length of the average workweek de clined from 37.8 hours to 36.9 (table 2). This decrease reflects a slight but noticeable trend away from long workweeks (48 hours or more) and an increase in part-time employment (less than 35 hours a week). In 1962, 22 percent (3 percentage points more than in 1965) of the employees worked at least 48 hours a week, while part-time work accounted for 27 percent of the work force as op posed to 30 percent 3 years later. Changes at other points along the hours continuum were still smaller. The average number of hours worked weekly declined in each region—by 1.2 hours in the North- MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 880 east and the North Central region, by 0.9 hour in the South, and by only 0.2 hour in the West. As a result, the hours differential between the North east and South, the regions with, respectively, the shortest and longest average workweek, increased from 4.9 to 5.2 hours. In each region, long hours accounted for a smaller and part-time work for a greater proportion of the retail trade work force in 1965 than in 1962. A somewhat different pattern of hours changes emerged when employees were grouped by the sales-size of the enterprise and establishment in which they worked. In enterprises with $1 mil lion or more in annual sales, the average number of hours worked per week declined from 36.3 to 35.7. However, in enterprises with a lower sales volume the decline was more than twice as great— 1.4 hours from the 1962 level of 39.4 hours a week. Unlike the pattern followed nationally and re gionally, there was no change in the proportion of employees working 48 hours or more a week in enterprises with $1 million or more in annual sales. There was, however, a 3-point decline in the pro portion of those working more than 42 and less than 48 hours a week. The proportion working exactly 40 hours dropped from 31 to 28 percent, while part-time employees increased from 28 to 31 percent. Changes in the distribution of employees by weekly hours of work in establishments with $250,000 or more in sales which were parts of $1 million enterprises generally followed the pattern for the entire enterprise group. The vast maj ority of the employees in this sales-size class were sub ject to the maximum hours standard applied to large retail establishments by the 1961 amend ments to the Fair Labor Standards Act. A 44hour maximum standard workweek was estab lished for these employees in September of 1963, and lowered to 42 hours a year later. Employees covered by the act and working longer than the established standard workweek would generally have to be paid 1i/2 times their regular rate for all time worked beyond the maximum standard. De spite the legislated change in the standard, the proportion of employees working longer than 42 hours a week declined by only 2 percentage points, from 24 percent in 1962, a decrease of only 8 percent. It is interesting that in every other sales-size category, there was a greater decline, both absolute and relative, in the proportion of employees work ing longer than 42 hours a week—ranging from 4 to 8 percentage points or from 10 to 22 percent. There was also a decline in the proportion of those working 48 hours and over, and increases in the proportions working 40 hours and less than 35 hours. The magnitude of the changes at these latter levels was rather small, never exceeding 5 percentage points. A decline in the length of the average workweek occurred in each maj or industry group. The larg est, 1.3 hours, took place in motor vehicle dealer ships and gasoline service stations, while the small est, 0.5 hours, was found in general merchandise stores. This last group and the building materials and hardware group (in which the average work week dropped by 0.8 hours) were the only ones where the decline in the average workweek was less than the 0.9-hour drop noted for all retail trade. The shortening of the workweek persisted in each of the selected retail lines. Employees of shoe stores worked 0.5 hours less in 1965 than in 1962, the smallest change among the lines, while employees of gasoline service stations experienced the largest decline in the average workweek, 1.7 hours. In each line, the proportion of employees working 48 hours or more decreased while the proportion of part-time employees increased. — A l v in B a u m a n Division of National Wage and Salary Income Erratum The New York City price (in dollars) of 1.1 pounds of white bread is 0.273 rather than 0.546 as reported in table 2 on page 773 of the July 1966 issue of the Review. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WAGES IN PAINT, CANDY, AND SOUTHERN SAWMILL INDUSTRIES Wages in Paint, Candy, and Southern Sawmill Industries T h e f o l l o w i n g a r t i c l e summarizes surveys of wages and related benefits conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in three industries, late in 1965. Each survey developed information on the average and distribution of straight-time earnings paid to all production and related workers and separate data for workers in selected occupations, as well as information on such establishment practices as paid holidays, paid vacations, health, insurance, and pension plans.1 Data were tabulated by loca tion, establishment size, and other factors which influence wages and working conditions. Paint and Varnish Manufacturing Straight-time hourly earnings of production and related workers in paint and varnish manufactur ing establishments 2 averaged $2.56 in November 1965—15 percent above the average recorded in May 1961 when the Bureau conducted a similar survey.3 Averages among the regions ranged from $1.97 an hour in the Southeast to $2.97 in the Pacific region.4 1 Earnings inform ation developed by these studies excludes premium pay for overtime and for work on weekends, holidays, and late sh ifts, and, thus, it is not comparable w ith the gross average hourly earnings published in the Bureau’s m onthly hours and earnings series. More comprehensive accounts of the surveys w ill be presented in forthcom ing BLS bulletins. These bulletins w ill contain an explanation of the differences between the earnings and employment estim ates provided by the two series. 2 The survey covered establishm ents em ploying eight workers or more and classified: in industry 2851 as defined in the 1957 edition and the 1963 supplement of the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, U.S. Bureau of the Budget. T h is sum mary w as prepared by Charles M. O’Connor of the D ivision of Occupational Pay. 3 For an account of the earlier survey, see M onthly Labor R e view, January 1962, pp. 42—43. Earnings data for workers in the allied products branch of the industry (excluded from the 1961 survey) tend to lower the average for all production work ers in the current survey by about 1 cent an hour. Thus, the percent of increase since the 1961 survey is 14.8 percent if these data are included and 15.2 percent if they are excluded. 4 For definition of regions, see footnote 2 of table 1. Average earnings in the other five regions studied separately but not in the table w e r e : Middle West, $2.63 ; New England, $2.32 ; South west, $2.18 ; Border States, $2.13 ; and Southeast, $1.97. 5 Standard M etropolitan S tatistical Areas as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Budget through March 1965. 8 Individual releases for each area were issued earlier and are available upon request. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 881 Men accounted for 95 percent of the 31,147 work ers covered by the survey and averaged $2.58 an hour; women averaged $2.09 and were most com monly employed as labelers and packers. Slightly more than nine-tenths of the workers were employed in metropolitan areas.5 As indi cated in the following tabulation, average hourly earnings in the 18 areas studied separately ranged from $2.02 in Baltimore to $3.16 in San FranciscoOakland.6 Area Atlanta Baltimore Boston Chicago Cleveland Dallas _ _ __ Detroit___ _ _ _ __ _ _ Houston__ _ Kansas City _ _ _ Los Angeles-Long Beach and Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove Louisville Newark and Jersey City__ _ New York Paterson-Clifton-Passaic. Philadelphia Pittsburgh St. Louis. San Francisco-Oakland Number of production workers 407 920 632 4, 453 1, 581 641 1, 481 432 628 1, 747 686 2, 092 1, 474 379 1, 943 469 637 1, 093 Average straight-time hourly earnings $2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 22 02 43 60 60 41 88 21 71 2. 90 2. 48 2. 71 2. 34 2. 42 2. 60 2. 66 2. 64 3. 16 In each region, average hourly earnings were higher in the larger establishments than in the smaller ones. Averages were also higher in estab lishments with labor-management contracts cover ing a majority of their production workers than in those without such contract coverage. (Establish ments with collective bargaining agreements accounted for two-thirds of the work force.) In the Southeast, however, averages in union and nonunion establishments were identical. Because of the interrelationship of these and other factors, the exact influence on earnings of any one char acteristic could not be determined in this study. Earnings of 94 percent of the workers were within a range of $1.50 to $3.50 an hour; about 3 percent earned less than $1.50 and 3 percent earned $3.50 or more. The middle half of the workers earned between $2.24 and $2.92. The occupational classifications for which data are presented in table 1 accounted for nearly threefifths of the workers covered by the survey. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 882 Virtually all of the establishments provided paid holidays. Provisions for 6, 7, 8, or 9 days an nually, with additional half days in several in stances, applied to slightly more than four fifths of the workers. Provisions for 10 days or more applied to a seventh of the workers and were com mon only in the New England and Middle Atlan tic regions. All establishments provided paid vacations to production workers with qualifying periods of service. Typical vacation provisions were 1 week of pay after 1 year of service, 2 weeks after 2 years, and 3 weeks after 15 years. Provisions for at least 4 weeks after 25 years of service covered half of the workers. Life, hospitalization, and surgical insurance were available to more than nine-tenths of the production workers in the industry ; medical insurance applied to nearly four-fifths ; accidental death and dismemberment insurance and sickness and accident insurance to approximately threefifths; sick leave plans (mostly full pay, no wait- Average hourly earnings for these occupations ranged from $2.26 for labelers and packers to $2.98 for varnish makers. Numerically the most important job studied separately, fillers averaged $2.43. Averages for most of the jobs in the Mid dle Atlantic, Great Lakes, Middle West, and Pacific regions exceeded the national averages; in the New England, Border States, Southeast, and Southwest regions, occupational averages were generally below national averages. Earnings of individual workers were widely distributed within the same j ob and geographic area. Work schedules of 40 hours a week were pre dominant in establishments employing 94 percent of the production workers in November 1965. About 8 percent of the workers were employed on second shifts at the time of the study. Shift differ entials paid to these workers varied widely, but most commonly amounted to 10 cents an hour above day-shift rates. Third-shift operations ac counted for approximately 2 percent of the work force. T a b l e 1. N u m b e r a n d A v e r a g e S t r a ig h t -T im e H o u r l y E a r n in g s 1 o f P r o d u c t io n W o r k e r s in P a in t a n d V a r n is h M a n u f a c t u r in g E s t a b l is h m e n t s , b y S e l e c t e d C h a r a c t e r is t ic s a n d S e l e c t e d R e g io n s ,2 N o v e m b e r 1965 Item United States3 Number All production workers. M en__ Women. S iz e o f E s t a b l is h m e n t 8-99 workers_______________________________ 100 workers or m ore.----- ------------------------------- Earnings 1 Middle Atlantic Number Earnings 1 Pacific Great Lakes Number Earnings 1 Number Earnings 1 31,147 $2. 56 8,275 $2. 60 11,363 $2. 65 3,213 $2.97 29, 684 1,463 $2.58 2.09 7,929 346 $2.62 2.07 10,713 650 $2.68 2. 09 3,077 136 $3.00 2.30 14,915 16; 232 2.35 2.75 4,162 4,113 2.37 2.83 3,867 7,496 2.45 2.75 1,540 1,673 2.87 3. 07 19,883 11,264 2.69 2.33 6,654 1,621 2. 65 2.39 7, 700 3, 663 2.68 2.58 2,527 686 3.07 2.63 3,216 '737 2,132 1,350 '911 1,829 2,524 162 289 292 895 845 1,419 ' 759 690 2.43 2.34 2. 26 2.34 2.86 2. 61 2.57 2.64 2. 77 2.64 2. 85 2.59 2.92 2.59 2.98 770 167 510 254 221 379 735 32 67 81 231 203 350 188 184 2.49 2.44 2.33 2.39 2.90 2. 60 2. 61 2. 60 2.82 2.67 2.90 2. 67 2.95 2. 77 3. 05 1,166 367 736 485 339 806 767 49 80 86 324 308 536 147 281 2. 50 2.43 2.33 2.46 2.95 2. 70 2.67 2. 62 2.81 2.74 2.89 2. 61 2. 99 2.81 3.01 390 29 234 142 65 135 276 20 64 19 90 94 166 140 80 2.86 2.68 2.64 2.92 3.47 3. 06 2.96 3.14 3. 23 3.37 2.98 3. 04 3.33 3.12 3. 29 L a bo r -M a n a g e m e n t C ontract Status Establishments with— Majority of workers covered______________ None or minority of workers covered_______ S e l e c t e d O c c u pa t io n s Fillers, hand or machine (3,066 men, 150 women). Janitors (705 men, 32 women)________________ Labelers and packers (1,554 men, 578 women)---Laborers, material handling (all men)_________ Maintenance men, general utility (all men)------Millers-grinders (all men)___________________ Mixers (all m en)___________________________ Receiving clerks (all men)___________________ Shipping clerks (all men)____________________ Shipping and receiving clerks (all men)________ Technicians (865 men, 30 women)_____________ Testers, product (795 men, 50 women)_________ Tinters (1,418 men, 1 woman)________________ Truckdrivers (all men)______________ _______ Varnish makers (all men)------------------------------ 1 Excludes premium pay for overtime and for work on weekends, holidays, and late shifts. 2 The regions shown include: Middle Atlantic—New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; Great Lakes—Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin; and Pacific—California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2 Includes data for regions in addition to those shown separately. N o t e : Dashes indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publica tion criteria. WAGES IN PAINT, CANDY, AND SOUTHERN SAWMILL INDUSTRIES ing period) to slightly more than half; and catas trophe insurance to about two-fifths. Pension plans, providing regular payments for the remainder of the retiree’s life (in addition to Federal social security benefits), were in effect in establishments employing seven-tenths of the pro duction workers. Plans providing lump-sum payments at retirement covered 5 percent of the work force. These health, insurance, and pension benefits relate to plans financed at least in part by the employer; employers, however, typically paid the total costs. Candy Manufacturing Straight-time hourly earnings of production and related workers in plants manufacturing candy and other confectionery products averaged $1.87 in September 1965.7 (See table 2.) All but 4 percent of the 49,736 workers covered by the survey had earnings within a range of $1.25 to $3 an hour; the middle 50 percent earned between $1.51 and $2.14. Accounting for nearly threefifths of the workers, women averaged $1.69 an hour; men averaged $2.11. The September 1965 average was 19 percent above the average in November-December 1960, when the Bureau conducted a similar survey.8 The industry was most heavily concentrated in the Great Lakes and Middle Atlantic regions 9 where earnings averaged $1.95 and $1.88 an hour, 7 T h is survey covered estab lish m en ts t h a t em ployed 20 w orkers or m ore an d w ere classified in in d u stry 2071 as defined in th e 1957 editio n an d 1963 supplem ent of th e S ta n d a rd In d u stria l Classifi cation M anual, U.S. B u reau of th e Budget. E stab lish m en ts p rim a rily m a n u fa c tu rin g solid chocolate bars (SIC 2072), those p rim a rily m a n u fa c tu rin g chew ing gum (SIC 2073),, those p ri m arily m aking confectionery fo r direct sale on th e prem ises, and those p rim a rily engaged in shelling an d ro a stin g n u ts (these are classified in tra d e in d u strie s) w ere excluded. Also excluded from th e stu d y w ere se p a ra te au x iliary u n its such as cen tral offices. T h is sum m ary w as p repared by C harles E . Scott, Jr., of th e D ivision of O ccupational P ay. 8 F o r re su lts of th e e a rlie r survey, see “W ages in Candy M anu factu rin g , N ovem ber-D ecem ber 1960,” M o n th ly Labor R eview , Ju ly 1961, pp. 737-742. 8 The regions in th is stu d y a r e : N ew E ngland— C onnecticut, xMaine, M assach u setts, New H am pshire, Rhode Islan d , and V er m ont ; M iddle A tla n tic — New Jersey, New York, and P en n sy l v an ia ; S o u th ea st— A labam a, F lo rid a, Georgia, M ississippi, N orth C arolina, S outh C aro lin a, a n d T e n n e sse e ; G reat L akes— Illinois, In d ian a, M ichigan, M innesota, Ohio, W isconsin ; and Pacific— C alifo rn ia, N evada, Oregon, an d W ashington. xo S e p a ra te releases, p ro v iding in fo rm atio n on earnings and su p p lem en tary benefits fo r these six a re a s of in d u stry concen tra tio n , w ere issued earlier and are available upon req u est to the B ureau. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 883 respectively. Workers averaged $2.22 an hour in the Pacific region, $1.79 in New England, and $1.50 in the Southeast. Information was devel oped separately for six metropolitan areas which together accounted for nearly one-half of the industry’s employment. As indicated in the fol lowing tabulation, average earnings of production workers in these areas ranged from $1.79 in Boston to $2.28 in San Francisco-Oakland.10 Metropolitan area Boston New York Philadelphia Chicago Los Angeles-Long Beach San Francisco-Oakland Number of production workers 4,160 3,845 2,588 9,976 1,422 1,572 Average straight-time hourly earnings $1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 79 86 93 09 11 28 Men averaged more than women in each region, with the differences ranging from 51 cents in the Great Lakes to 12 cents in the Southeast. Differ ences in average pay levels for men and women may be the result of several factors, including variation in the distribution of the sexes among establishments and jobs with disparate pay levels. Nationwide, workers in metropolitan areas aver aged 21 cents an hour more than those in nonmet ropolitan areas. Earnings of workers in estab lishments with 250 employees or more averaged $1.95 an hour; in establishments with 100 but less than 250 employees, $1.85; in establishments with 20 but less than 100 employees, $1.66. Production workers in establishments with un ion contracts accounted for one-half of the work force. These workers averaged $1.93 an hour, compared with $1.80 for those in establishments without such contracts. In the Pacific region, averages in union establishments were 25 cents an hour more than those in nonunion establishments ; however, in the Middle Atlantic and Great Lakes regions, earnings averaged about the same for the two groups of establishments. Regionally, estab lishments having collective bargaining agreements accounted for slightly more than eight-tenths of the workers in the Pacific region, seven-tenths in the Middle Atlantic, four-tenths in the Great Lakes region, nearly two-tenths in New England, and slightly more than one-tenth in the Southeast. Nearly 8 percent of the workers covered by the survey earned less than $1.30 an hour, 16 per cent earned less than $1.40, and 23 percent earned MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 884 less than $1.50. Regionally, the proportions earn ing less than $1.50 an hour were: About two-thirds in the Southeast, one-fourth in New England, slightly more than one-fifth in the Great Lakes, one-seventh in the Middle Atlantic, and less than 5 percent in the Pacific region. Data were tabulated separately for a number of selected occupations. Numerically the most im portant job surveyed separately, fancy hand pack ers (mostly women) averaged $1.67 an hour. Men maintenance machinists had the highest average earnings—$3.05 an hour. In jobs where compari sons for all regions were made, average hourly earnings were highest in the Pacific region and lowest in the Southeast. Earnings of individual workers varied considerably within the same job and general geographic location. In some in stances, hourly earnings of the highest paid work ers exceeded those of the lowest paid in the same job and the same area by $1 or more. Weekly work schedules of 40 hours applied to four-fifths of the workers nationally and more than nine-tenths in all but one of the regions stud ied separately. In the Great Lakes region (prin cipally Chicago), schedules of 48 hours or more applied to two-fifths of the workers. Nationally, nearly a fifth of the production workers were em ployed on second shifts at the time of the study; most of the workers were paid shift differentials, the single most common amount was 5 cents an hour above first-shift rates. Third-shift opera tions accounted for about 3 percent of the workers. Nearly all workers were provided paid holi days. The most common provisions were 6 or 7 days annually, with additional half days in some instances. Holiday provisions varied consider ably among the regions. For example, a third of the workers in the Middle Atlantic region re ceived 11 paid holidays, while the maximum num ber provided in the Southeast was 6. T a b l e 2. N u m b e r and A v e r a g e S t r a ig h t - T im e H o u r l y E a r n in g s 1 o f P r o d u c t io n W o r k e r s O t h e r C o n f e c t io n e r y M a n u f a c t u r in g E s t a b l is h m e n t s , by S e l e c t e d C h a r a c t e r is t ic s S e p t e m b e r 1965 United S tates3 New England Middle Southeast in C and y and and R e g io n s ,2 Great Lakes Pacific Characteristics Num Earn Num Earn Num Earn Num Earn Num Earn Num E arn ings 1 ings 1 ber ings 1 ber ings 1 ber ings 1 ber ber ings 1 ber -- 49,736 $1.87 5,339 $1.79 13,863 $1.88 3,628 $1.50 15,997 $1.95 4,329 $2.22 ______ ______________ ______ 20,872 28,864 2.11 1.69 1,960 3,379 2. 07 1.62 5,542 8,321 2.15 1.71 1,782 1,846 1.56 1.44 7,367 8,630 2.23 1.72 1,660 2,669 2.49 2.05 ___ 44, 001 5,735 1.89 1. 68 5,104 1.79 13,514 1.88 3,074 1.53 13,380 2, 617 1.99 1.78 4,180 2.21 10,473 11, 500 27, 763 1.66 1.85 1.95 489 4,120 1.85 1.77 2,853 2,724 8,286 1.64 1.77 2.00 1,419 1,404 1.43 1.64 2,9ß3 2,702 10,332 1.56 1.86 2. 09 1,610 2,103 2.30 24,844 24,892 1.93 1.80 4,384 1.78 10,037 3,826 1.89 1.88 3,216 1.49 6, 574 9,423 1.94 1.96 3,590 739 2. 26 2.01 773 1,780 2, 571 463 2. 55 2.14 1.89 2.28 131 105 170 54 2.45 2.25 1.81 2.12 132 607 486 103 2.53 2.18 1.79 2.24 52 253 341 28 1.91 1.51 1.45 1.62 246 456 1,071 161 2.66 2.31 2.13 2.47 107 194 147 55 2.83 2. 55 2.30 2. 62 1,930 432 1,954 1.62 1.85 1.75 2. 89 1.39 1.72 2.03 1.69 1.80 1.91 2.92 1.61 2.10 1.63 1.88 126 94 136 12 176 105 245 401 1.35 1.38 1.45 2.15 1.34 1.30 1.37 1.52 593 157 867 135 795 553 1,258 1,457 1.60 1.99 2.02 3.19 1.74 1.55 1.71 1.95 2.57 636 302 484 128 356 60 1,195 414 2,213 673 2.06 3,375 1,392 5,638 3,564 89 20 237 29 521 96 Packers, hand, bulk (3,318 women, 57 men) . _ ___ Packers, hand, candy bars (1,362 women, 30 men) Packers, hand, fancy (5,636 women, 2 m en). _. Wrapping-machine operators (3,407 women, 157 men)_____ 1.69 1.78 1.91 3.05 1.58 1. 74 1.67 1.85 347 Laborers, material handling (1,936 men, 18 women) 218 104 543 223 1.88 2.05 2.05 2.13 All production workers------- -----------M en. . . . Women. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ---- _ S ize of C o m m u n it y Metropolitan areas 4___ _ S iz e o f E s t a b l is h m e n t 20-99 workers 100-249 workers._ ____ _____ 2.50 w ork ers or more, 2.1 2 L a b o r -M a n a g e m e n t C ontract S tatus Establishments with— Majority of workers covered None or minority of workers covered... _ __ S e l e c t e d O c c u pa t io n s 5 Candy makers, class A (all m en).. __ Candy makers, class B (1,684 men, 96 women)...... ........... Candy makers’ helpers (2,397 men, 174 women)__ _ _ _ Enrobing-machine operators (378 men, 85 women)_____ Enrobing-machine operators’ helpers (1,789 women, 141 men)___ . ______ 962 1 Excludes premium pay for overtime and for work on weekends, holidays, and late shifts. 2 For definition of regions, see text footnote 9. 3 Includes data for regions in addition to those shown separately. Alaska and Hawaii were not included in the study. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 4 Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Budget through March 1965. 3 The forthcoming BLS bulletin will provide earnings information for occupations in addition to those shown here. WAGES IN PAINT, CANDY, AND SOUTHERN SAWMILL INDUSTRIES Virtually all workers were employed in estab lishments providing paid vacations after qualify ing periods of service—usually 1 week of vacation pay after 1 year of service, 2 weeks after 3 years, and 3 weeks after 15 years. Slightly more than a third were eligible for 4 weeks after 25 years. Regional variations in provisions were more pro nounced for the longer periods of service: The proportions of production workers employed in establishments providing 1 week after 1 year ranged from 75 percent in the Southeast to 97 percent in the Pacific region; after 15 years of service, 22 percent of the workers in the Southeast were eligible for 3 weeks, compared with 89 per cent in the Pacific region. Life, hospitalization, and surgical insurance were available to approximately seven-eighths of the workers. Sickness and accident insurance ap plied to three-fifths; medical insurance, to seventenths; and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, to slightly more than half of the work ers. These benefits relate to plans financed at least in part by the employer; employers typically paid the total costs, although this practice varied by region. For example, in New England 95 percent of the workers were in establishments providing life insurance but only 26 percent were covered under plans wholly financed by the employer. In the Middle Atlantic region, however, 83 percent were covered by employer-financed plans and only 3 percent by jointly financed plans. Retirement pension plans (other than Federal social security benefits) were provided by estab lishments employing three-fifths of the workers. Regionally, the proportions ranged from 45 per cent in the Great Lakes region to 87 percent in the Pacific region. Most of these workers were cov ered by employee-financed plans. Formal provisions for nonproduction bonuses, usually Christmas or yearend, were in effect in plants accounting for one-fourth of the workers nationally, two-fifths in the Great Lakes region, a third in New England, and a fifth or less in the remaining regions. 11 T h is survey covered estab lish m en ts em ploying eig h t w orkers or m ore an d classified in in d u stry group 242 as defined by th e 1957 edition of th e S ta n d a rd In d u stria l C lassification M anual an d supplem ents, U . S . B ureau of th e B udget. T he follow ing sum m ary w as p rep ared by Joseph C. B ush of th e D ivision of O ccupational Pay. 12 F o r re su lts of th e ea rlie r survey, see “W ages in S outhern Saw m ills an d P la n in g Mills, Ju n e 1962,” M o n th ly Labor R eview , F eb ru ary 1963, pp. 151—153. 2 2 4 -9 6 6 0 - 6 6 - 4 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 885 Southern Sawmills and Planing Mills The 100,184 production workers covered by the survey11 averaged $1.39 an hour in October 1965. (See table 3.) All but 3 percent were paid on a time-rate basis; 1 out of 8 workers were in mills with union agreements. The $1.39 average was 11 percent above the earn ings level in June 1962 ($1.25) when the Bureau conducted a similar survey.12 Most of this in crease appears to have been due to a change in the Federal minimum wage from $1.15 to $1.25, effec tive September 3, 1963. During both survey pe riods, more than half the workers had hourly earnings at or within a few cents of the Federal minimum wage. Earnings in the Southeast region, accounting for about three-fifths of the work force, averaged $1.37 an hour, compared with $1.42 in the South west and Border States. Among the States tabu lated separately, hourly averages ranged from $1.33 in Georgia to $1.45 in West Virginia. Aver age earnings in the seven Southeastern States were between $1.33 and $1.43, with averages of $1.39 to $1.45 in the three Border States and the three Southwestern States. The proportion of workers earning between $1.25 and $1.30 was about threefifths in the Southeast, compared with two-fifths in the other two regions. Many establishments operated logging camps in conjunction with their milling operations. Ac counting for nine-tenths of the production work ers, mill workers earned a few cents an hour more than logging workers in the Border and Southeast regions, but 1 cent less in the Southwest. Differ ences in average hourly earnings among other characteristics (type of wood, size of mill, etc.) usually amounted to only a few cents. Among the occupational classifications studied separately, averages ranged from $2.70 an hour for head-saw operators on band saws to between $1.28 and $1.31 for most unskilled jobs. Lumber stack ers and machine offbearers, the twTo numerically most important occupations, each averaged $1.29 an hour. Regionally, occupational averages were almost always lowest in the Southeast, with those in the Border States and the Southwest averaging a few cents an hour more. Work schedules of 40 hours a week were in effect in mills employing slightly more than three- 886 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 T a b l e 3. N u m b e r a nd A v e r a g e S t r a ig h t - T im e H o u r l y E a r n in g s 1 o f P r o d u c t io n W o r k e r s in S a w m il l s P l a n in g M il l s , by S e l e c t e d C h a r a c t e r is t ic s , S o u t h and R e g io n s ,2 O c t o b e r 1965 Border States Total South Characteristics Number Earnings 1 Number Southeast Earnings 1 Number and Southwest . Earnings 1 Number Earnings 1 ________ ___ 100,184 $1.39 16,301 $1.42 56,883 $1.37 27,000 $1.42 Mill workers------------------------- ---------------- ----------Logging workers .. - ------------- - ------------------ 90, 825 9,359 $1.39 1.37 13, 774 2,527 $1.43 1.40 52, 059 4,824 $1.37 1.33 24,992 2,008 $1.42 1.43 67,004 33,180 1.37 1.43 13,839 2,462 1.41 1.49 40, 791 16, 092 1.35 1.41 12,374 14,626 1.39 1.45 49, 058 51,126 1.42 1. 36 11,990 1.44 25, 861 31, 022 1.40 1.34 11,207 15,793 1.43 1.41 802 1,951 3,141 2,179 1,109 470 2,408 2,529 1,981 5, 657 7, 838 4,834 2,300 1,500 1,093 2,748 2,402 3,267 3,770 1.38 1.34 1.37 1.30 1.48 2.70 1.95 1.29 1.30 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.28 1.31 1.78 1.28 1.31 1.37 1.36 160 415 702 205 102 53 635 443 494 1,362 1,330 994 327 153 142 271 385 787 600 1.39 1.35 1.39 1.33 1.60 2.87 2.00 1.31 1.32 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.73 1.33 1.34 1.43 1.41 498 986 1,865 1,409 577 213 1,490 1,155 1,220 3,636 5,134 3,120 1,476 877 675 1,652 1,484 2,043 2,290 1.36 1.34 1.35 1.28 1.43 2.65 1.89 1.27 1.29 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.27 1.29 1.71 1.26 1.29 1.35 1.35 144 550 574 565 430 204 283 931 267 659 1,374 720 497 470 276 825 533 437 880 1.42 1.35 1.42 1.33 1.52 2.71 2.18 1.30 1.28 1.38 1.31 1.30 1.32 1.34 1.96 1.29 1.34 1-33 1-37 1,191 2,033 920 1,600 1.44 1.37 1.30 1.34 361 731 299 350 1.51 1.39 1.34 1.39 526 1,154 570 884 1.39 1.34 1.28 1.30 304 148 51 366 1-43 1!■ 36 L 40 All production workers_______ S iz e of M il l 8-99 workers---- -- ------- --------- ------------- ----------100 workers or more------- ------------ - --------------------P r e d o m in a n t Hardwood----- - - - Se l ec ted O T y pe of W ood --- ......... .................. c c u p a t io n s 3 Sawmills and planing mills Block setters___--- ---------------------- - ----- ----- --Cut-off-saw operators______________________________ . __ __ _ - _ _ . Firemen, stationary boiler_________________________ Graders, planed lumber ___ __ _ _. _ ----- . Head-saw operators, band sa w ... ------------------ -------Head-saw operators, circular saw---------------- --------- _ Loaders, car and truck----------------- -_--- - Log deckmen________________________________ ____ Lumber stackers, air drying or storage - ----------------Off-bearers, machine 4_____________________________ Sawmilling operations. -----------Planing operations_________ ___________________ Planer operators (feed only). . - - --- -_- ------- -- _ Planer operators (set up and operate) --------- -----------Sorters, green chain__ Trimmermen_____ _______________________________ Truckdrivers___________________ _ ----------------Truckdrivers. power (forklift)__________________ ____ E d g erm en . Logging Cat drivers, skidding _ _ _ _ ----- _ --------- ------- __ Fallers and buckers, power_________________ ______ Teamsters, logging ______ _______ __________ _ Truckdrivers, logging__ ___________________________ 2 The forthcoming BLS bulletin will include earnings information for occupations in addition to those shown here. 4 Includes workers in addition to those shown separately. 1 Excludes premium pay for overtime and for work on weekends, holidays, and late shifts. 2 The regions used in this study are: Border States— Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia; Southeast—Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee; and Southwest—Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas. N ote: Dashes indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publi cation criteria. fourths of the production workers. Most of the remaining workers wTere scheduled to work 45 hours or more a wTeek. Less than 5 percent of the workers were employed on late shifts at the time of the survey. About one-fourth of the workers were provided paid holidays, ranging from 1 to Y days a year. Paid vacations after qualifying periods of service were provided by mills employing almost threetenths of the workers in the Border States and Southeast regions and slightly more than twofifths in the Southwest. In each region, the most common provision after 1 year of service was 1 wreek of vacation pay. Life, hospitalization, and surgical insurance benefits, for which the employer paid at least part of the cost, were provided by establishments ac counting for two-fifths of the workers. Acciden tal death and dismemberment, sickness and accident, and medical insurance benefits were provided by establishments employing between a fifth and a fourth of these workers. When these benefits were provided, the employees usually shared in the cost. Retirement pension plans, providing regular payments for the remainder of the retiree’s life (in addition to social security benefits), were in effect in only a few mills. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Technical Note Seasonally Adjusted CPI Components H a r r ie t t J . H a r p e r a n d Ca r l y l e P . S t a l l in g s * A n i n c r e a s i n g a w a r e n e s s of the importance of seasonal influences in period-to-period statistical comparisons has resulted in a need for either sea sonally adjusted price indexes, or factors which can be used to adjust or interpret indexes pre viously published only on an unadjusted basis. Elimination of seasonality is particularly im portant in periods of rapidly changing prices. Seasonally adjusted indexes reflect price changes after elimination of the effects of annually re curring events: weather conditions, crop-growing cycles, special sales, holiday seasons, and industry model changeover periods. An index showing only the long-run movement and irregular in fluences caused by unusual events, but undisturbed by the usual seasonal price patterns, enables ana lysts to isolate factors requiring necessary deci sions by policymakers which affect long-run poli cies and objectives. Businesses have needed price indexes and other economic data adjusted for sea sonality in order to plan optimum use of plant, equipment, and labor. Changes in the patterns of production and marketing have been brought about by the use of such information. Seasonal adjustment factors for various CPI components were published in 1963.1 Because of the relatively minor seasonal fluctuations in the index for all items which results from offsetting movements in its various components, the Bureau did not publish seasonally adjusted indexes. Also considered were problems which might result from publication of the index on both a seasonally ad- justed and an unadjusted basis, especially in months when the two indexes show opposite changes. The need for these indexes as analytical tools, however, outweighs any problems which might result from their publication, particularly since the overall index—all items—will not be sea sonally adjusted. Seasonally adjusted indexes for selected compo nents of the CPI, in which there are significant Seasonal V a ria tion in Selected Consumer Price Index Components, 1965 The above chart shows unadjusted and seasonally ad justed 1965 indexes for the extremes of seasonal variation among the components for which these indexes are available. Fruit and vegetable prices experienced the greatest seasonal movement and footwear the least. After seasonal adjustment the index of fruit and vegetable prices still showed erratic movements which are caused by the so-called “irregular” factors. After adjustment for these irregular factors, the dot-dash line shows a slight downward move *Of th e Office of P rices and L iving C onditions, B ureau of ment during the year. Extremely unfavorable weather L abor S ta tistic s. conditions in major producing areas, which drastically 1 See Seasonal F actors, C onsum er P rice In d e x : Selected Series, curtailed supplies, account for most of the irregular J u n e 1 953-M ay 1961 (BLS B ulletin 1366, 1963)« influences. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 887 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 888 T able 1. S e a s o n a l F a c t o r s 1 f o r A d j u s t in g C o m p o n e n t s of th e C o n s u m e r P r ic e I n d e x , 1966 [Year Average=100J Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Food____ ____ _________ . . . . . _______ . . . Food at home.. ______ ____ _ . . . Meats, poultry, and fish . . . . . . . ... Dairy products _____ _____ Fruits and vegetables____ Other food at home_______ 99.8 99.8 100.0 100.7 97.7 100.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.3 99.0 100.2 99.7 99.7 99.3 100.1 100.0 99.3 99.7 99.6 98.7 99.5 101.8 99.1 99.6 99.5 98. 2 99.2 103.4 98.8 99.9 99.9 98. 5 99.0 105.1 98.4 101.0 101.3 100.2 99.5 106.7 99.2 100.3 100.4 101.4 99.9 100.7 99.8 100.3 100.3 102.1 100.2 96.4 101.4 100.0 100.0 101.2 100.6 95.8 101.8 99.7 99.6 100.4 100.6 96.1 100.8 99. 99. 99. 100. 97., 100. Fuel and utilities. . ____ ____ .. .. .. . --------- .. Fuel oil and coal.______________ _____ .. .. . 100.4 102.2 100.2 102.3 100.3 101.9 100.1 100.7 99.7 98.6 99.6 98.0 99.5 97.9 99.5 98.0 99.8 98.7 100.0 99.8 100.2 100.6 100. 101. Apparel and upkeep________________ Men’s and boys’___. . . _______ ________ .. Women’s and girls’. .. . . . . . . ---- -Footwear______________ _ __ _________ _ . . 99.5 99.6 99.0 100.0 99.6 99.6 99.3 99.9 99.7 99.6 99.5 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.7 100.0 99.9 100.0 99.6 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.7 99.9 99.6 99. 7 99.5 99.7 99.6 99.7 99.3 99.8 100.2 100. 2 100.5 100.0 100.6 100.4 101.4 100.1 100.6 100.6 101.2 100.2 100. 100. 101. 100. Transportation---------- ----- ------------ ---------------Private__ . . . . _____ ...i......... . .. 100.4 100.4 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.5 99.7 99.7 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.9 100.1 100.1 100.0 100.0 99.8 99.8 100.4 100.5 100.5 100.6 100. 100. Commodities_____ _ ______ . . . _ __ . . _ . . . Nondurables.— _____ .. .............. . . . .. Durables_____ . . ___ . . . . . --------------Commodities less food____ .. . . . . . . ------- . . . _ Nondurables less food________ _______ . . . . Apparel commodities. _ __ Apparel less footwear. ______ ____ New cars . . ----Used cars .. . . . . . . . . . --------. .. Housefurnishings. . „ _______ 99.9 99.8 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.4 99.4 100.8 98.5 99.7 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.5 99.4 100.4 97.2 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.6 100.2 98.1 100.2 99.8 99.8 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.8 99.7 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.6 99.9 100.1 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.4 101.2 100.2 100. 2 100.4 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.8 99.7 98.8 101.4 99.9 100.0 100.1 99.8 99.7 99.8 99.5 99.5 98. 7 100.1 100.1 99.8 100.0 100. 2 100. 2 100.3 98.1 101.2 100.0 100.2 100.2 100. 2 100.3 100.4 100.9 100.9 100. 9 101. 2 100.0 100.1 100.0 100.4 100.4 100.3 100.8 100.9 101. 9 101.1 100. 99. 100. 100., 100., 100. 100. 101. 99. 100. Components 100. 0 99.3 100.3 100.1 101. 1 99.7 100.1 Dec. 1 Seasonal factors are for all Index series which are currently being seasonally adjusted. These factors were derived by the BLS seasonal factor method using data for 1956-65, and will be updated at the end of each calendar year for use in adjusting indexes for the subsequent year. seasonal patterns of price change, were first pub lished in early 1966.2 These components and their factors for 1966 are shown in table 1. These fac tors are scheduled to be updated annually. The seasonally adjusted indexes are calculated only at the national level and are published simulta neously with the original or unadjusted indexes. Computation procedures for the unadjusted series are not altered in any way by seasonal adjust ments. The additional calculation merely adjusts the original indexes by the derived seasonal fac tors. At this time, there are no plans to publish seasonally adjusted indexes by city. The seasonal factors used in deriving the ad justed indexes were developed from the BLS sea sonal factor method, using data for 1956-65. This is an adaptation of the ratio-to-moving-average method,3 with allowances for changing seasonal patterns. Seasonal factors are obtained by elimi nating the underlying trend-cycle movement of the series and the irregular fluctuation from the T able 2. E ffect of S e a s o n a l V a r ia t io n s 1 on 2 See CPI release, January 1966 and M o n th ly L a b o r R e v ie w , April 1966, pp. 405—409. 3 A brief description of the method of seasonal adjustment for the Consumer Price Index is available upon request from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washing ton, D.C. 20212. the C o n s u m e r P r ic e I n d e x , by C o m po nents, 1965 [Based on 1965 seasonal adjustment factors and component weights] Components All items__________________ Food at home___________________ Food away from home. _____ _____ Shelter_________________________ Fuel and utilities________________ Household furnishings and operation. Men’s and boys’ apparel__________ Women’s and girls’ apparel________ Footwear_______________________ Other apparel and upkeep_________ Private transportation____________ Public transportation_____________ Medical care____________________ Personal care____________________ Reading and recreation___________ Other goods and services__________ Jan. F eb. - 0 . 012 - 0 . 078 - 0 .1 2 3 - 0 . 036 0 - .0 0 4 .0 2 0 .0 1 0 0 - .0 1 1 - .0 2 8 - . 002 .0 0 2 - .0 5 1 .0 0 4 0 - .0 0 3 0 - .0 1 5 - 0 . 054 - .0 0 4 .0 2 0 .0 1 5 .0 0 8 - , 011 - .0 2 0 - .0 0 2 .0 0 2 - .0 6 3 .0 0 1 0 0 0 - .0 1 5 0 .0 2 0 .0 2 1 - . 008 - .0 1 1 - . 040 0 .0 0 2 .0 5 0 .0 0 1 - .0 0 6 0 0 - .0 0 5 M ar. A pr. M ay June - 0 .0 9 6 - 0 .1 3 9 - 0 .0 9 4 - 0 . 072 - 0 . 090 - 0 . 018 0 0 .0 0 5 .0 0 8 - .0 0 3 - .0 1 2 0 .0 0 2 - .0 3 8 .0 0 2 .0 0 6 .0 0 3 .0 1 8 - .0 1 5 - .0 0 5 - .0 2 0 - . 015 0 0 - .0 1 6 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 6 .0 0 3 .0 0 6 - .0 1 0 - .0 0 5 - .0 2 0 - .0 2 1 0 - .0 0 3 - .0 1 2 - .0 0 2 .0 0 2 - .0 1 3 0 .0 1 2 - .0 0 3 - .0 0 6 - .0 0 5 N ov. A ug. S ep t. O ct. 0 .1 9 9 - 0 .0 0 5 0 .0 4 0 0 .1 2 8 0 . 077 0 .0 4 9 0 .2 3 9 - . 005 0 - .0 2 6 0 - .0 0 9 - .0 2 0 - . 004 - .0 0 4 .0 1 3 - .0 0 1 .0 1 2 0 - .0 0 6 .0 1 0 0 .0 7 3 0 - . 020 - .0 2 5 - . 015 - .0 0 9 - .0 2 8 - .0 0 3 - .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 6 - .0 0 3 .0 0 6 .0 1 5 0 .0 5 5 .0 0 5 - .0 2 0 - .0 1 0 0 .0 0 6 .0 2 0 0 - . 002 - .0 2 5 - .0 0 1 - .0 0 6 - .0 0 3 .0 0 6 .0 1 5 0 .0 0 5 0 0 0 .0 1 1 .0 5 6 .0 0 2 004 .0 6 3 - 0 . 073 - 0 . 056 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 7 .0 4 8 .0 0 3 - .0 0 2 .0 7 6 - .0 0 4 - .0 0 6 - .0 0 3 . 006 .0 0 5 0 0 .0 2 1 0 .0 1 4 .0 4 0 .0 0 3 0 .0 3 8 .0 0 1 - .0 1 2 .0 0 5 0 - .0 0 5 J u ly - . 001 - . 006 - .0 0 3 0 .0 0 5 D ec. 1 Relative effects were computed by multiplying the relative weight of the computation for food at home in January 1965 was: 18.18 x (99.8—100.0) each component by its seasonal adjustment factor minus 100. For example, = —0.036 percent. N ote: Because of rounding, monthly variations may not equal zero. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SEASONALLY ADJUSTED OPI COMPONENTS 889 original data. When the seasonal factor has been applied to the original data, it removes the an nually repetitive pattern which makes prices in certain months consistently higher or lower than in others. The all-items index is affected only slightly by seasonal factors because of offsetting movements among the various components; this index will therefore not be published on a seasonally adjusted basis. Illustrating these offsetting movements, table 2 shows the relative effects of seasonal varia tion of the index components on the total index in 1965. Most of the seasonal variation in the index occurs in prices of food at home, women’s and girls’ apparel, and private transportation. In the first half of the year, these groups generally move downward seasonally, resulting in a slight net seasonal decline in the total index. With few exceptions, this trend is reversed in the latter half, resulting in a net seasonal advance. However, the net seasonal is less than one-tenth of 1 percent emigration of top scientists and other highly cent—the July figure. During the early years of the struggle with Napoleon, the Board of Agri culture tried to get crop statistics—but unsystematically. From the potato famine spring the start in 1847 of Irish agricultural statistics—successfully collected by, of all people, the police. Unwillingly, the Boards of Guardians tried to* do the same in England in the 1950’s; a more successful Scottish attempt foundered on cost. The Inland Revenue, after the cattle plague, got the agricultural returns going to 1866, largely through the post office; and tried to do the same in England in the 1850’s; a more successful Scottish grumbling from farmers and some pretty rum returns, one can be sure. The questions seem few and simple by today’s standards, but it is remarkable that in those pen-pushing days the results, including full county details, were got out in a matter of months. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis —‘"Counting Sheep,” T h e E c o n o m is t, June 18, 1966. Foreign Labor Briefs* Belgium —E q u a l P a y The first strike ever staged by women workers in Belgium ran from February 16 to May 5. Striking for pay equal to that of their male co workers, 3,000' women employed by the national weapons plant near Liège accepted management’s offer, which amounted to almost TO percent of the demanded full-wage parity. Belgium is a party to the 1951 Equal Remuneration Convention of the ILO and to the equal pay provisions of the 1957 Rome Treaty establishing the Common Market ; the Labor Ministry, however, estimates only a 70percent compliance with the obligation for elimi nation of wage differentials because of sex. Brazil—M a n p ow er D e p lo y m e n t A sampling of the enterprises in Rio de Janeiro that employ a paid work force indicated that the average enterprise had 14 permanent employees. Approximately half of the industrial and business enterprises employed no wage and salary earners, but were composed solely of owners, partners, and occasional collaborators. (The 1960 industrial and commercial censuses had revealed averages of 27 employed persons in each firm in industry and 5 in commerce. ) The first of its kind to be under taken by the Statistical Service of the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, the sampling of forms submitted annually by employers indicated that 47.2 percent of the wage and salary earners were employed in industry, 39.1 percent in commerce or credit institutions, 8.5 in transportation and communications, and the remaining 5.2 percent in services. The study also revealed that 94 percent of the wage and salary employees are Brazilians, whereas Brazilian legislation requires only that 67 percent be Brazilian (i.e., born, naturalized, or having children born in Brazil). Italy — W age R ise T ied to P rices Approximately 50 percent of the labor force recently benefited from automatic wage increments ♦ P rep ared in th e Office of F oreign L abor and T rade, B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s , on th e basis of m a te ria l available in early Ju ly . 890 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis that were based on increases in the cost of living. Thus, about 9 million wage earners in industry, commerce, and agriculture received an automatic wage increment on May 1, because of a 1-point rise in the special consumer price index of the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) during the quar ter January 16-April 15. An additional 2 mil lion Government workers, retirees, and their survivors will receive a similar increment when cumulative changes in the special price index for the whole year are calculated. The country’s an nual wage bill (including the resulting increased social security charges paid by employers) will subsequently rise by approximately 54 billion lire (US$86 million). Of this amount, US$75 million will be paid to industrial workers. Japan — T ech n ical A ssista n c e Since 1960, the Japanese Government has been training Southeast Asians in Japan to serve as vo cational instructors in their own countries in elec tricity, mechanics, woodworking, and other trades; sending experts to those countries, upon request ; and assisting in the establishment and operation of technical training centers. New aspects of the program, as announced by the Labor Minister at a recent conference on Southeast Asian Economic Development in Tokyo, include stationing Japan ese vocational training experts in these countries and sending mobile vocational training seminars into the region. New Zealand—L abor S h o rta g e The labor shortage in New Zealand is worse now than at any time since 1961. According to the Department of Labor, there w^ere 8,984 job vacan cies but only 336 registered unemployed on Decem ber 30, 1965. The shortage is particularly acute in the manufacturing sector, which accounts for over one-quarter of the employed labor force. The emigration of top scientists and other highly trained personnel is also cause for concern. 891 FOREIGN LABOR BRIEFS Portugal—E m ig ra tio n A decree-law aimed at accomplices rather than emigrants themselves was the latest attempt by the Government to prevent manpower losses through illegal emigration. Adopted on April 5, the decree provided for prison terms ranging from 2 to 8 years at hard labor for persons who (a) entice individuals to leave the country without proper documentation, (b) participate in the acquisition of passports for tourism which in reality are intended to be used for emigration, or (c) assist illegal emigrants in any way. Although strongly endorsing the harsh new penalties as a step in the right direction, the independent newspaper 0 Seculo commented that the problem of illegal emigration could not be solved without improving the living conditions of the Portuguese workers. Sweden —L a b o r P eace An impasse in negotiation of a new basic national agreement between the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and the Swedish Employers’ Federation (SAF) threatened the most serious labor conflict since 1945. The LO had placed a ban on all overtime work, and the SAF had countered with a call for a general lock out to idle more than 800,000 workers. On April 1, however, contract provisions proposed by the Government-appointed mediation commission were accepted: A shorter workweek (42*^ hours) ; higher severance pay; and an increase in wages of 4 percent in 1966, 3.4 percent in 1967, and 2 percent in 1968. The new agreement is the first to take account of the wage drift, i.e., the tendency of wages actually paid in many industries to exceed the officially negotiated rates; it guarantees a wTage drift increase of 27 ore (US$0.05) per hour in the second and third years of the contract. Syria —E conom ic C rim es The first Economic Sanction Law or Economic Penal Code to be enacted in the Arab world was issued in Syria in May 1966. The 39 articles of Legislative Decree No. 37 define and specify pun ishment of workers for numerous economic crimes https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis of commission and omission. Under the code, workers’ acts of negligence or carelessness, such as harming public property or wasting materials, are punishable by imprisonment of 6 to 24 months; specified, deliberate acts or omissions, such as dam age to goods and equipment or drawing up “bad plans” for public economic projects, may lead to 15 years at hard labor. United Kingdom —P a y r o ll T ax Trying to redeploy labor from the service and construction industries to manufacturing, the Gov ernment issued a law requiring employers to pay a novel payroll tax beginning September 5, 1966. The “Selective Employment Tax” is designed to stimulate investment in manufacturing. After paying the tax, manufacturing employers will be returned both the full amount paid and a special premium of about 30 percent of the tax. Agricul tural employers, local governments, nationalized industries, and transport enterprises will also re ceive a full refund of the tax, but they will receive no premium. Employers in the service industries (retail and wholesale trades, banking, insurance, and finance) and construction will receive neither a refund nor a premium. U.S.S.R .—F a rm W ages Collective farmers will henceforth receive guar anteed wages in money as well as in kind. A joint decree of the Government and the Communist Party authorized the new system for general ap plication in July 1966. The wage rates are to be based on rates already established for workers on State farms. The decree provides that the guaranteed wage in money—and in kind where stored grain, fodder, and other farm products are available—will be paid at least once a month. If the collective farm runs short of money, the State Bank is obliged to grant credits for a period of up to 5 years. The Soviet press did not report how many collective farmers wTere involved, but a Moscow radio broad cast announced that some 16 million families of collective farmers on about 38,000 collective farms will be affected. Significant Decisions in Labor Cases* Non-Communist Affidavits. The U.S. Supreme Court held1 that filing of false non-Communist affidavits by union officials under section 9(h) of Labor Management Relations Act was not justified by the officials’ belief that the law was constitution ally invalid. Without ruling on the constitution ality of the now repealed provision, the Court found that the officials had been in a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, a type of action that is criminal even when the law involved is not valid. The Court, however, remanded the case for a new trial because the trial court had disal lowed examination of the Government witnesses’ preindictment testimony before a grand jury. Section 9(h) of the LMRA provided that a labor union could not secure certain services of the NLRB unless each of its officers and each of its parent organization’s officers filed affidavits attest ing that he is not a member of the Communist Party or “affiliated with such party, and that he does not believe in, and is not a member of, or sup port any organization that believes in or teaches, the overthrow of the U.S. Government by force or by any illegal or unconstitutional methods.” The prosecution contended that, in order to re tain the Communist Party’s control over a union (the Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers) and yet to secure the much needed services of the Board, the union (petitioners) and the Communist Party decided that the union’s leaders should nominally resign from the party and file affidavits pursuant to section 9(h). Three of the officers filed such affidavits at different dates in subsequent years, al though their party affiliations remained unaffected. The union then proceeded to utilize the services of the Board. Subsequently the six petitioners were prosecuted and convicted for conspiring to defraud the NLRB by impairing, obstructing, or defeating its lawful function. During the trial the Court denied the petition ers’ request to inspect grand jury testimony of 892 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Government witnesses which was alleged to be in consistent with the trial testimony. The Court held that the petitioners showed no “particularized need” for such inspection. The appeals court con ceded the trial court’s error in denying the peti tioners’ motions, but held it was not a reversible error because the witnesses were thoroughly and competently cross-examined without manifest in consistency. The Supreme Court rejected the petitioners’ con tention that their conduct was not fraudulent be cause section 9(h) merely required the Board to certify any officer who filed, without regard to the truthfulness of his statements. The Court held that Congress’ unmistakable intent was the filing of truthful affidavits, the act even providing that criminal laws be used against violators. In asking that their convictions be set aside, the petitioners’ main contention was that section 9(h) was unconstitutional. In 1959, they said, it was replaced by another provision—section 504 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act—later declared by the C ourt2 to be a bill of attainder. But the Court refused to rule on the question, holding that the petitioners were in no position to attack the constitutionality of the law. The Court relied upon its ruling in Kay v. United States ,3 where it held, without passing upon the validity of the act involved, held that “when one undertakes to cheat the Government or to mislead its officers, or those acting under its authority, by false statements, he has no standing to assert that the operations of the Government in which the effort to cheat or mislead is made are without con stitutional sanction.” The Court said that a claim of unconstitution ality will not be permitted to excuse a deliberate, voluntary, and calculated action of fraud and deceit, and that one who elects such a method of self-help may not escape the consequences by at♦Prepared in the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor. The cases covered in this article represent a selection of the significant decisions believed to be of special interest. No attem pt has been made to reflect all recent judicial and adminis trative developm ents in the field of labor law or to indicate the effect of particular decisions in jurisdictions in which contrary results may be reached based upon local statutory provisions, the existence of local precedents, or a different approach by the courts to the issue presented. 1 D ennis v. United States (U.S. Sup. Ct., June 20, 19©6). a United States v. B row n, 381 U.S. 437 ; see also M onthly Labor R eview , September 1964,, pp. 1063-1064. 3 303 U.S. 1. DECISIONS IN LABOR CASES tacking the constitutionality of the law he sought to evade. The Supreme Court, however, held that the peti tioners had the right to examine during the trial Government witnesses’ testimony given before the grand jury. The Court said it recognized the “long established policy that maintains the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings in the Federal courts,” but in this situation a review of the testi mony was called for. The Court pointed out that since the grand jury testimony was taken 15 years earlier, was uncorroborated, and was given by four witnesses—two of them accomplices, one a paid in former, and one a former member of the union— there was evidence of room for error and a good reason for hostility toward the petitioners. In short, there was a “particularized need” for the ex amination of the grand jury testimony to deter mine the validity of the witnesses’ testimony at the trial. In his vigorous dissent, Justice Black, joined by Justice Douglas, argued, first, that “if the pro visions of section 9(h) requiring non-Communist affidavits constitute a bill of attainder4 then . . . the filing of [such affidavits under the section], whether true or false, cannot be said to have inter fered with any lawful or legitimate function of the [NLRB].” Second, he condemned what he called “a novel doctrin e” established by the m ajo rity de cision that “unconstitutionality of a law which forms the very nucleus of a criminal charge can not be a defense to that charge.” Illegal Strike. A Federal court of appeals up held 5as substantially supported an NLRB finding that it was unlawful for a union to call a strike in protest against the employer’s alleged violation of a preferential hiring agreement by an attempt to employ nonunion men, because the agreement con tained a provision which, in effect, accepted the union’s standards of qualifications and competence and thus gave its members priority in hiring. A plumbing and heating company for New York City, had a bargaining agreement with a local union of plumbers which read in part: The Association agrees that its members will give pri ority in employment opportunity to qualified and com petent men based uj«on their length of employment in the geographical areas of the union as contrasted and com pared with men who have worked mainly in other geo https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 893 graphical areas. The previous hiring practices in all respects shall continue, including practice as to qualifica tions and competency, and furthermore, members of the union may be hired as in the past without regard to prior length of service. When the company needed additional men, the City’s Commission on Human Rights, acting in pursuance of an antidiscrimination law, referred to it four nonunion, nonwhite, allegedly quali fied applicants for employment. The Commission advised the company that the applicants were qualified and that its city contract might be can celed unless it changed its hiring practices. There upon, the employer notified the union that the applicants would be hired. The union requested arbitration, contending it did not discriminate against the applicants because they were Puerto Rican or Negro, but that such hiring was a viola tion of the “priority of employment” provision of the agreement. The applicants reported for work, but the un ion called a strike, ostensibly on the ground of a 2-week-old sanitation controversy. The new men were told there would be no work that day, even though the controversy was settled at 10 o’clock that same morning. The applicants re ported for work each day, but the union refused to call off the strike since the new workers could not prove union membership. The union steward told them, “We don’t work with nonunion people.” The union refused to provide competent workers until the dispute had been arbitrated. Near the end of the second week of the strike, the Mayor suggested an examination for the applicants. Three of them took it, and failed. The president of the local himself said the test was highly tech nical, presupposed preparatory study, and was given under poor conditions. Two of the appli cants filed unfair labor practice charges. The NLRB trial examiner’s finding, approved by the Board, was that the union had struck be cause the company threatened to hire nonunion men and not because of a sanitary dispute, and that the strike was continued to prevent the hiring of nonunion men and not because they did not qualify under the agreement’s provisions for “priority of employment,” as the union contended. i In ligh t of the decision in the B row n case. 5 N L R B v. L ocal 2, P lum bers (C.A. 2, M ay J2, 1966). MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 894 The court held there was ample evidence that the strike was called, and was continued, to prevent the hiring of the new men. The court further rejected the union’s conten tion that the strike was justified by the employer's alleged violation of the preferential hiring agree ment, holding that some of the provisions of the agreement were invalid under the LMRA. The provisions for hiring “qualified and competent” workers with seniority of employment in the geo graphical area was valid, the court held, over ruling a contrary opinion of the NLRB. But the remainder of the agreement was invalid under section 8(a) (3) and (f) (4) of the act: when read in the light of the union constitution’s require ment that the members should not work with nonm em bers, it in effect gave th e union a powTer to dictate standards of competence and qualifica tion, and it provided for possible hiring of the members “without regard to their length of service.” In rejecting the union’s argument that the Mayor’s intervention and the result of the exami nation given to the applicants should have been treated as a settlement of the strike, the court held that, “Since neither the Board, nor any of the four men—nor, indeed,” [the company]—“par ticipated in the settlement, since it did not profess to end or to redress the unfair labor practices, and since it appeared to assume the validity of the union’s insistence that the four men had to qualify by union standards, the Board rightly concluded that the settlement, if such it was, could not dis place the remedial procedures of the act.” Regarding the Board’s order for backpay, the court said, “The right to backpay is not a punitory award for having been the victim of an unfair labor practice; it rests on the right to have had work and presupposes the ability to do it. To award a man wages which he could not have earned would not be remedial but punitive. [Hence,] the Board’s order must be modified to permit inquiry in the compliance proceeding into the length of time for which, but for the union’s activities, the four men, on the basis of their ability and other factors, would have been kept at work . . . ,” the court said. The life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience. The felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, even the prejudices which judges share with their fellowmen, have had a good deal more to do than the syllogism in determining the rules by which man should be governed. The law embodies the story of a nation’s development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis —Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., T h e C o m m o n L a w . Chronology of Recent Labor Events the agreement was begun June 30 by Electrical Workers (IUE), and involved 5,300 employees in a dispute over the elimination of incentive pay for production-line workers. The new agreement calls for a change to straight hourly pay for all employees, but workers formerly receiving incentive pay will receive a “plus rate” addition to their wages through July 5, 1971. July 18 July 5, 1(966 T h e P acific M aritim e A ssociation and the Longshore men and Warehousemen announced agreement on a 5-year contract which provides total wage increases of 90 cents an hour. The 15,000 members of the union will receive 50 cents and hour the first year (retroactive to July 1). The Mechanization and Modernization Agreement was also renewed. July 8 T h e T eamsters ended their convention in Miami Beach, Fla., after voting to create a position of general vice president, to be filled by Frank E. Fitzsimmons, who “shall assume such duties as may he delegated to him by the general president.” (See MLR, July 1966, pp. III-IV .) and Confectionery W orkers ended their 2-week-old strike at 10 Nabisco plants throughout the country by accepting minimum pay increases of 17.5 cents an hour. Some workers will receive additional 5to 15-cent increases after classification adjustments. The strike began when employees of the National Biscuit Co., in Buena Park, Calif, rejected a new contract offer. A merican B akery A greement with five voluntary hospitals and their affili ates was reached by the Drug and Hospital Employees Union Local 1199 of New York City. The 9,000 members of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union affiliate will receive a 10-percent wage increase retroactive to July 4, 1966, and a 7^-percent increase in July 1967. A minimum wage of $1.90 an hour and corresponding in creases for employees higher up the ladder will be effec tive January 1, 1968. The settlement ended a week-long series of work stoppages in the 19 hospitals affected. July 13 P resident J oh nson signed a bill increasing wages and A proposal to end a dispute between New Jersey con tractors and the Operating Engineers was offered by Secretary of Labor W. Willard Wirtz and New Jersey Labor Commissioner, Raymond Male. It includes a guar antee of 1,600 hours of work and pay for seasonal em ployees, total wage increases of 50 cents an hour, and provision for the establishment of a Development Author ity to pay workers whose earnings opportunities had not totaled 1,600 hours. fringe benefits for 1.8 million Federal classified and postal employees. Included in the law, effective the pay period beginning July 3, are pay raises of 2.9 percent, full retire ment at age 55 for employees with 30 years’ service, in creased Government contributions to health insurance, and liberalized overtime benefits. July 15 A BILL, H.R. 2035, which would have automatically in creased the costs of Star Route postal contracts whenever the Consumer Price Index rose by at least 1 percent a year, was vetoed by President Johnson. In his message to the House of Representatives, the President stated that approval of this measure would result in “automatic, and often unjustified, wage increases [that] would fuel the fires of inflation.” U nited M in e W orkers and large coal producers did not violate Federal antitrust laws by entering into an indus try-wide collective bargaining contract at terms smaller coal companies could not meet. A Federal district court in eastern Tennessee decided, in P e n n in g to n v. U n ite d M in e W o r k e r s o f A m e r ic a , that this is not sufficient proof that the parties had engaged in restraint of trade under the Sherman Antitrust Act. “It also must be shown that there was a ‘predatory intent’ on the part of union and large producers to drive such other employers out of business.” (See MLR, September 1965, pp. 1105-1108.) July 16 E mployees at Westinghouse Electric Corp. in Columbus, Ohio, ratified a contract which will provide wage increases of between 19 and 27 cents and hour. A strike preceding https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis July 19 July 27 A n emergency board was created under the Railway Labor Act to avert a strike by the Transport Workers against American Airlines. This action delayed the strike for at least 60 days. The union represents the same groups of workers at American Airlines as does the Machinists Union on the five struck airlines. (See MLR, April 1966, p. 535.) 895 Developments in Industrial Relations* ment effective in 1968 and made no provision re garding travel time for loggers. The GeorgiaPacific and St. Regis agreements also provided wage increases of 20 cents the first year, 12 cents in 1967, and 10 cents in 1968. Other terms were generally similar to the above settlements. Dairies West Coast Lumber Nearly 60,000 workers were covered by the 3-year collective bargaining agreements reached in the first week of June in the Pacific Northwest fir, lumber, and plywood industry. The “Big Five”—Weyerhauser Corp., U.S. Plywood Corp., Crown Zellerbach Corp., International Paper Co., and Rayonier, Inc. bargaining together as the Northwest Forest Products Association—settled with the Lumber and Sawmill Workers (an affili ate of the Carpenters) and the Woodworkers (IWA) on a package reportedly worth 55 cents an hour. Some 23,000 employees were affected by the settlement. The Timber Operators C o u n c i l (TOC), representing some 200 firms with 27,000 workers, agreed to a similar package with the two unions, as did the Georgia-Pacific Corp. (7,500 em ployees) and the St. Regis Paper Co. (2,500 em ployees) . These agreements were expected to set a pattern for an additional 20,000 workers in the industry.1 While all the settlements provided the same total package, they differed slightly in the amounts applied to wages and to supplementary benefits. The “Big Five” contract provided wage increases of 20 cents an hour effective in June 1966, 12 cents in June 1967, and 10 cents in June 1968; in equity adjustments averaging 2 cents an hour in June 1966 and 1 cent in June 1968 were also in cluded. A shift differential increase of 4 cents, and a 7th paid holiday, the Friday after Thanks giving, were to be effective in 1968. The com panies agreed to a 4-cent-an-hour increase in con tributions to the Health and Welfare Fund in the second year «of the contract, and a 1-cent-an-hour increase in pension contributions the third year. In 1967, 1y2 cents an hour will be allocated for travel time for loggers. The TOC agreement was similar to the “BigFive” but it provided a 2y2-cent inequity adjust896 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis In early June, the Teamsters and fluid milk com panies in the San Francisco Bay area reached agreement on a 2-year contract. Some 4,000 em ployees were provided with wage increases of 15 cents an hour retroactive to April 1, and an addi tional 12y2 cents effective in April 1967. Double time pay was provided after 9y2 hours in any 1 day, haulers, however, were to receive double time only after 4 7 ^ hours in any 1 week. (Pre viously, time and one-half had been paid for all hours worked over 8 in any 1 day and to haulers for all hours over 40 in 1 week.) A production premium which stemmed from improved output in automated plants afforded an additional $1.80 a day for inside employees of plants owned or con trolled by retail outlets; a premium of 80 cents a day was provided plant workers in wholesale oper ations where the volume of liquid dairy products exceeded an average of 5,000 gallons daily. Com pany payments to the pension fund were increased to 25 cents an hour, from 20 cents, beginning in April 1967. (The minimum contribution was to be $2 a day and the maximum $43.25 a month.) A major medical plan was also established. Some 1,750 dairy workers represented by the Teamsters were to receive wage increases of $13 a week over a 3-year period, under the terms of contracts with seven major dairies in the Wash ington, D.C. area. Weekly increases of $5 became effective in June, with additional $4-a-week in creases becoming effective in June of both 1967 and 1968; route foremen received additional wage adjustments. Ratified on June 5, the agreements afforded improvements in both overtime and holi day pay; the companies’ payments to the pension and social insurance funds were also increased. ♦P repared in th e D ivision of W age Econom ics, B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s, on th e basis of published m a te ria l available in early Ju ly . 1 See “B a rg ain in g in th e W estern L um ber I n d u s try ,” M o n th ly Labor R eview , A ugust l&SS, pp. 925-931. 897 DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Other Manufacturing Some 3,500 workers at the New York Shipbuild ing Corp.’s shipyard in Camden, N.J., received a 15-cent-an-hour wage and fringe increase. Rati fied on June 24 by the Boilermakers, the 1-year con tract provided an 8-cent-an-hour wage increase, a ninth paid holiday, improved health and welfare benefits, and other supplementary benefits. The new basic hourly rates for production workers in clude $3.29 for first-class mechanics and $2.66 for helpers. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., reached agreement with the Machinists on a 2-year contract covering 2,300 workers in Milwaukee, Wis. An immediate 3-per cent wage increase was provided, with an addi tional 3 percent effective March 20,1967. Pension benefits were increased to $3.50 (from $3) a month for each year of credited service. The settlement ended a 6-week strike that began May 4. The com pany is a leading producer of electrical control devices. The P ratt and Whitney Aircraft Division of United Aircraft Corp. at North Haven, Conn.2and the Auto Workers, representing 5,300 production and maintenance workers, agreed on a new 3-year contract early in June. The agreement included an immediate 8-cent-an-hour wage increase and 8 to 14 cents an hour increases in both 1967 and 1968. Other provisions included a 10-percent second shift differential instead of the previous flat 15 cents; Friday after Thanksgiving as a ninth paid holiday; 3 weeks of vacation after 10 instead of 12 years and a fourth week after 20 years; company payment of an increased proportion of insurance premiums; and establishment of up to 5 days’ sick leave annually for those with a year’s service. The previous contract which expired May 15 was extended on a day-to-day basis after a 1-day work stoppage on May 16. A strike by 10,000 members of the Electrical Workers (IUE) that had idled some 13,000 work ers since early June at General Electric’s Lynn and Everett, Mass., plants ended on June 30. The dispute began when the company raised the pay of engine testers one step or 12^ cents an hour. 3 See M o n th ly Labor R eview , May 1966, p. 540, F eb ru ary 1966, pp. 191-192, an d Ju ly 1966, p. 785, fo r e a rlie r U nited A irc ra ft Corp. settlem en ts. 3 See M o n th ly Labor R eview , Ju n e 1966, p. 667. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis After demands from component testers for similar increases were denied, 130 of them walked out in late May. By June 7, most workers at the plants were on strike. The ratified agreement provided for the transfer of workers who test controls and accessories to the higher rated engine-testing jobs. Negotiations on pay for component testers will continue. The IU E also struck Westinghouse’s major ap pliance plant in Columbus, Ohio. Some 5,500 members of Local 746 went out on June 6. A union spokesman said the issues included griev ances, incentives, overtime wages, and employee furloughs. New York’s newspaper strike was slowly draw ing to a close in early July as members of the strik ing Newspaper Guild ratified their contract with the World Journal Tribune and negotiations with the Pressmen and the Mailers were close to con clusion. During May and J une, seven other craft unions had completed negotiations with the merged paper on additional severance pay for laid off employees, and additional moneys to prevent de pletion of the unions’ pension and health and wel fare funds. The only union officially on strike,3 the News paper Guild, settled its dispute with the news paper on June 28. The paper had originally pro posed severing one-half of the 1,800 Guild mem bers at the three papers and selecting employees to be retained, in many instances without regard to seniority. Under the terms of the settlement, the paper will retain about 1,000 employees. (A Guild, canvass of its membership revealed more than 400 offers to resign.) The new agreement also provided the $12 package increase which had been negotiated last year by the Guild and the other nine craft unions with other publishers. Transportation and Utilities The Western Division of Greyhound Lines and the Transit Union ended a month-and-a-half long strike by 5,000 bus drivers and maintenance and clerical employees on J une 24. The strike had af fected some 100,000 passengers a day in 11 western States. Ratified by a 3,014 to 1,215 vote, the agreement provided increases of 10 cents an hour for hourly employees and 4 mills a mile for drivers during the first year, but no general increase the second 898 year. Maintenance workers were to receive an ad ditional 10 cents the first year and 5 cents the sec ond year. In the second year, the company was to pick up the employee’s 4-percent contribution to the pension fund, add a paid holiday, improve vacation provisions, increase spread- and standbytime pay, and provide a dental program for office employees. A 5-year contract for West Coast Longshoremen was negotiated over the Independence Day week end against a background of a slight decline in labor cost per ton loaded. In addition to increas ing wages and benefits, the contract provided for the lump-sum distribution to Class A longshore men of part of the Mechanization and Modern ization Fund accumulated under the previous con tract. The 15,000 Longshoremen are to receive a $4.50-a-day pay increase in the first year of the contract with the Pacific Maritime Association. The increase averaged 5614 cents an hour—50 cents an hour for the first 6 hours and time and one-half (75 cents an hour) for the last 2 hours of a guaranteed 8-hour day. Over the term of the contract, the straight-time rate of Longshoremen was to rise 90 cents; the average rate for the 8-hour day was to rise to $1,011/4 an hour, an increase of 26.6 percent. The Mechanization and Moderni zation Fund was renewed and employers agreed to increase their contribution to $6.9 million a year (from the previously $5 million). Other terms included 45 instead of 40 hours of straight-time pay for each week of vacation; monthly pension benefits of $235 instead of $165; retirement at age 65 instead of 63; payment of one-half the normal pension to widows of men who at death were age 60 with 25 years of service and had not retired; and improvement of hospital benefits. Under the original Mechanization and Modernization agreement of June 1959, employers contributed $1.5 million to a jointly administered fund designed to give the fully registered work force a share in the savings resulting from the introduction of laborsaving devices. In October 1961, the fund was improved and provisions were made for supplemental wage, death and disability, and vesting benefits; employer contributions were increased to $27.5 million over a 5y2-year period. The settlement in July 1966 provided an employer contribution of $34.5 million over 5 years to be added to the $2 million unexpended portion of the 1961-66 fund. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 Approximately $14 million of the $29 million negotiated in 1959 and 1961 was paid out to Long shoremen, $13 million was set aside in a wage guar antee fund, and the final $2 million was unex pended. Some 10,500 Class A Longshoremen are covered by the new fund agreement, and will receive a lump-sum payment of $1,200 each from the unused $13 million set aside in the guaranteed wage fund. During the period since the fund was estab lished, tonnage on the Pacific Coast increased more than 40 percent and tons loaded per hour also increased 40’ percent. Therefore, despite a 34percent increase in hourly compensation, labor costs excluding payroll taxes per ton of loaded cargo decreased 3.6 percent—from $6.39 in 1959 to $6.16 in 1965. During June, 2-year agreements were concluded by Western Union with two unions—the CWA representing 4,000 workers in the metropolitan New York City area, and the Commercial Teleg raphers representing 20,000 workers in other areas. The latter agreement was reached after intermittent strikes.4 The agreement with the Communications Workers of America was reached on June 1. It provided wage increases of 41/2 percent in June of both 1966 and 1967, except for messengers, who received a 4-cent hourly increase in the first year, if they have had at least 2 years of service; no wage increases were provided to messengers with shorter service. Additional inequity adjustments were afforded most plant department employees. Three weeks’ vacation was provided after 10 years of service, instead of 15, and Washington’s Birth day was made a seventh paid holiday. Effective June 1, 1968, the social security offset to pensions for present retirees will be reduced to 33y3 percent, from 45 percent; it will be further reduced to 13 percent in 1969. For active employees the reduc tion will go to 13 percent, from 25 percent, also effective in 1969. In June 1970, the offsets for both groups will be completely eliminated. The company begins to pay 25 percent of dependents’ hospital-medical-surgical insurance this year, and will increase the payment to 50 percent in June 1967. (The CWA had defeated the American Communications Association (Ind.) in a repre sentational election in April 1966.) 4 A 4-hour strik e took place on Ju n e 1 and a n o th er of 40 hours began on Ju n e 8. DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS The contract reached on June 10 with the Com mercial Telegraphers also increased wages 4% per cent in June of both 1966 and 1967 for all em ployees, except walking, bicycle, and telecycle messengers, who received a 5-cent hourly increase in June 1966, provided they had at least 2 years of service; no wage increases were provided mes sengers with shorter service. Skilled employees in the higher technical jobs in the plant depart ment, reportedly numbering between 2,000 and 3,000, received additional wage adjustments. Starting in January 1967, 3 weeks of vacation were provided after 10 years, instead of 15, and 4 weeks after 15 years, instead of 20. The pension plan was revised to reduce the social security offset from 33% percent to 29 percent in 1968, to 13 percent in 1969, and to eliminate the offset com pletely by June 1,1970. In both settlements, the mandatory retirement age was to be lowered in stages from age 70 to 67 over the next 4 years. A job security program provided that employees with 5 years of service would be offered comparable jobs without a reduc tion in pay if their jobs were eliminated. A sup plemental medicare plan was also established. Wages of some 2,200 employees represented by the Utility Workers increased 10 to 14 cents an hour, retroactive to May 1, after members ratified a 2-year contract with the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. on May 24. Benefits included a fifth week of vacation after 30 years and an eighth paid holiday. The company also increased its payment for hospital-surgical insurance to $10.50 a month, from $8.50. The union has the option of diverting this increase to improve the sick pay plan. Provision was also made for a wage re opener in 1967. Insurance In early June, agreement was reached between the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and the In surance Workers Union on a 2-year agreement esti mated at a $7.11-a-week package. Covering 8,500 insurance agents throughout the United States, the agreement culminated many attempts by the Insurance Workers to attain a national agreement. Previously, only Pennsylvania, Mis souri, New York and New Jersey were organized. The national agreement added coverage of 2,400 workers in 33 new units. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 899 Commission rate increases totaling $2.61 a week and security benefits valued at $4.50 a week over 2 years were provided in the pact. A provision for a supplemental pension benefit of $40 to $80 a month until age 65 for employees retiring between the ages of 55 and 60 was extended to newly covered employees. Group life insurance benefits were also to be improved. Other terms for retirees include elimination of their $9.50 a month contribution to health and welfare, and the integration of Medi care with company paid supplemental medical benefits. A 3-year agreement between the Title Guarantee Co. in New York City and District 65 of the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union ended a 1-day strike by 350 white-collar employees of the insurance firm. Terms included wage increases ranging from $14 to $26 a week over the 3-year duration, and improved pension and welfare bene fits. The union was unsuccessful, however, in its demand for a union shop. The Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance Co. of Richmond, Ya. announced plans to outfit its 118 employees with complete summer and winter office wardrobes costing $200 each. The company dis closed that it had arranged for employees to buy replacement clothing at a 45 percent discount— with the purchase cost and laundry bills deductible for income tax purposes. The uniforms consist of blazers, slacks or skirts, ties for the men, and white blouses for women employees. Shirts, hand bags, socks or stockings, and shoes are also supplied. A supplementary benefit designed specifically for working mothers was negotiated by the Office and Professional Employees with the American Income Life Insurance Company in Waco, Tex. Any mother required to work Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, or more than 1 hour overtime during the regular workweek, will receive a 75-cent an hour “supplemental child care allowance” to help defray the cost of additional babysitting expenses. Services and Minimum Wage On May 10, agreement was reached on a 3-year contract between the Associated Laundries, Inc. in the Portland, Oreg. metropolitan area and the Laundry, Dry Cleaning and Dye House Workers’ Union. Affecting more than 1,200 workers in about 40 dry cleaning plants, the pact provided a 900 24-cent-an-hour package increase retroactive to May 1, and established a pension plan. In Los Angeles County, a 4-year agreement was reached between the Barbers Union and some 1,000 barbershops. Haircut price increases, as stated by one union spokesman,5 were “. . . made necessary by a new health, welfare and pension program, that for the first time will provide barbers with the same kind of protection other workers enjoy.” Prices will rise to $2.15 from the previous $2 on July 1, with further increases to $2.25 on July 1, 1967, $2.35 on July 1, 1968, and $2.50 on July 1, 1969. Most barbers receive 70 percent of the hair cut prices, and the union estimates that the average barber gives 86 haircuts a week. Based on these figures, the typical barber’s equivalent weekly earnings should increase from $120.50 to $129.50 on July 1, 1966; to $135.50 on July 1, 1967; to $141.50 on July 1, 1968; and to $150.50 on July 1, 1969. The average $30 weekly increase over the life of the agreement would in part presumably finance some of the new benefits. On June 2, the New York State legislature passed a minimum wage bill which increases the minimum wage (effective January 1, 1967) to $1.50, from the present $1.25 an hour. Expected to affect between 600,000 and 750,000 workers, the measure would increase the minimum to $1.60 an hour when the Federal minimum is increased. Government Wisconsin’s 22,000 State Civil Service employees received a wage increase on July 1 averaging about $15 a month and totaling $4.2 million a year, under a measure approved by the State legislature’s joint finance committee. The increase, and a $5a-month cost-of-living increase, and a merit pay increase approved earlier for about 80 percent of the employees, were expected to cost about $7.7 million a year. Louisiana State employees received an average salary increase of approximately 10 percent on July 1. The average monthly salary for State em ployees increased to $382 from $347. On May 18, a 2%-year agreement was reached between the New York State Nurses Association and 21 municipal hospitals in New York City. The agreement provides increases in annual sal aries ranging from $900 to $3,000 the first year and https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 $350 to $800 the second year. Mayor John V. Lindsay had assigned a mediator to settle the wage dispute which had caused some 1,400 of the 3,300 nurses to threaten to resign. Terms included an increase in per diem rates for part-time nurses to $26 a day, from $23, and educa tion increment increases of $200 a year for nurses with a B.S. degree and $350 for those with an M.S.; an increase in differentials for work on second and third shifts of $300 a year; a $600-a-year special services differential for nurses engaged in direct patient care at the Department of Correction; an increase in the uniform allowance to $100 a year, from $60, along with the extension of coverage to men; and a $150-a-year maximum educational assistance and professional development provision after 1 year of service. New York City hospitals have had a large num ber of vacancies in nursing positions, reportedly because all nurses had to start at the entrance rate, regardless of experience. The new agreement con tained an overscale appointment provision stipu lating starting salaries one step above the mini mum for 2 years outside experience in the last 10 years, two steps for 4 years, and three steps for 5 years. After a threatened strike, an arbitration decision by Arthur Stark 6 guaranteed the right of 100,000 New York City workers to continue summer hours of 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. from mid-June to mid-Septem ber—a tradition inaugurated in 1957. The munic ipal government had unilaterally sought to con fine the schedule to July and August, the practice before 1957. Mr. Stark ruled that the government could not alter the summer schedule without negotiating with the 8 unions representing the workers. In Massachusetts, reestablishment of a single classification schedule under new legislation effec tive July 1 resulted in an increase in pay for 36,000 nonprofessional employees of the State, at a cost of $15 million a year. The dual pay schedule had been in effect since 1961, when professional employees received a 20 percent salary increase and nonprofessional workers received 10 percent. 5 Q. H. C a rter, S ecretary -T rea su rer of L/Ocal 1000 of the B a rb ers Union. 8 Im p a rtia l chairm an, of th e L abor M anagem ent C om m ittee of th e New York C ity D ep artm en t of W elfare. DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Agriculture Some 2 months after being recognized as bar gaining agent for 450 vineyard workers,7the inde pendent National Farm Workers Association signed a 1-year contract with Schenley Industries, Inc. Signed on June 21, the agreement provided vineyard workers in the Delano, Calif., area, with a $1.75-an-hour minimum pay scale. Other terms included a 35-cent-an-hour across-the-board wage increase, and elimination of any inequities among Schenley vineyard workers with respect to vaca tion and medical and hospital benefits. Meantime, a nationwide boycott sponsored by the AFL-CIO against Di Giorgio Corp. contin ued. The firm, the largest grower in the area, had agreed to hold a union recognition election, but Cesar Chavez, director of the Farm Workers, claimed his union could not accept the company’s ground rules. Though the Teamsters had won recognition elections at two Di Giorgio Corp. farms, the AFL-CIO and the Farm Workers filed suit to void the vote. Ronald W. Haughton, a Michigan industrial relations expert, was ap pointed to investigate the disputed representation election. In late May, Teamster International vice-presi dent George Mock announced that the union had signed up 2,000 California farm workers and had negotiated contracts with 8 major growers during May. He added that the Teamsters, operating as an industrial union, were organizing tractor and truck drivers, packing shed workers, and all skilled and semiskilled workers at individual ranches in addition to field workers. Construction Construction settlements affecting more than 80,000 workers were reported in June. Among these were: Building contractors in all of the State, except Newport County, agreed to a 3-year $1.15-an-hour contract with the Carpenters Union for 1,400 workers, providing wage increases amounting to 15 cents beginning June 1, 15 cents due December 1, 1966, 20 cents in both June and December of 1967, 22^ cents in June 1968, and 22 y2 cents in December 1968. The in crease totaled 27.2 percent, or 8.4 percent annually. R h o d e I s la n d C a r p e n te r s . 7 See M o n th ly L abor R eview , Ju n e 1966, pp. 667-668. 224-966' 0 — 66— — 5 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 901 The Carpenters Union repre senting 30,000 to 35,000 workers in the New York City area agreed to a 3-year agreement with area construction contractors. The new pact provided wage increases of 15 cents an hour on July 1, 1966; 10 cents effective Janu ary 1, 1967, July 1, 1967, and January 1, 1968; and 15 cents on July 1, 1968; as well as 8 cents an hour on July 1 to an annuity fund with additional increases of 10 cents on January 1, 1968 and 17 cents on July 1, 1968. The employers agreed to an immediate 2 cent-an-hour payment to an apprenticeship fund. There was also a change in holiday arrangements. The agreement was reportedly worth $1.06 an hour or 5.3 percent annually—slightly less than the 5.4 percent yearly package negotiated 3 years earlier. N e w Y o r k C i ty C a r p e n te r s . M ia m i L a b o r e r s . Some 1,800 construction laborers were to receive a 52.1-percent package increase over a 3-year period, an annual rate of 15 percent. The pact with the Associated General Contractors and the Homebuilders of South Florida gave the laborers a $1.25-an-hour package increase; 30 cents on June 1, 1966; 15 cents on October 1, 1966 ; 30 cents in April 1967; 15 cents in October 1967; 20 cents in April 1968; and a final 15 cents in October 1968. Previous scale was $2.25 plus fund contributions of 10 cents for health and welfare and 5 cents for industry advancement. The union could divert part of the in creases to benefits. The National Con structors Association and the Boilermakers in five South Central States (Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico) signed a 3-year 80-cent-an-hour agree ment for 10,000 construction boilermakers. It was re ported that these workers received a pay raise of 20 cents an hour in May 1966 and 20 cents again in May 1967 and May 1968. The agreement also provided a 10-cent-an-hour increase in the pension fund, to begin immediately, and 10 cents an hour to the health and welfare fund, effective November 10, 1966. S o u th C e n tr a l S t a t e s B o ile r m a k e r s . D a y to n , O h io. Four trades settled in late May with the Associated General Contractors in Dayton after a 3-week strike that idled 12,000 construction workers. The Car penters, Laborers, Iron Workers, and Cement Masons, totaling 5,500 workers, received increases ranging from 60 cents to 85 cents an hour over 2 years. The annual rate of increase ranged from 7.5 to 8.6 percent for these settlements. C h ic a g o T e a m s te r s . Building material and ready-mix cement companies and Teamster Locals 782, 786, and 801 signed a 3-year pact, reportedly worth 68 to 70 cents an hour, in early June. The 2,500 drivers were granted a 20-cent-an-hour wage increase retroactive to May 1, 1966, a 13-cent-an-hour increase May 1, 1967 and 15 cents again in May 1968. Some classification adjustments were also made. The agreement guaranteed 8 hours daily pay Mon day through Friday. A fourth week of vacation after 18 years of service was added (the maximum had been 3 weeks after 12 years). The contract also included 902 provisions to increase the health and welfare contribution by employers. T h r e e W is c o n s in U n io n s. The Wisconsin Road Builders Association agreed to 4-year contracts with three unions in early May. An agreement with the Operating Engineers provided a $1.15 to $1.35-an-hour package increase for 3,000 opera tors. Operating Engineers in the Milwaukee metropoli tan area received a $1.15-an-hour package with wage increases of 30 cents an hour in 1966, 20 cents in 1967, 20 cents in 1968, and 25 cents in 1969. Included in the pact was a 5-cent increment to health and welfare con tributions for the first 40 hours a week during 1966 and to welfare contributions for all hours worked after 1967, as well as payment of 15 cents to a pension plan for each hour worked beginning in 1968. In other parts of the State, wages and benefits were to increase by $1.35 an hour over the 4-year period, thus eliminating a 20-cent differential outside the six-county Milwaukee area. The pact stipulated a 35-cent-an-hour wage increase in 1966, 25 cents in 1967, 20 cents in 1968, and 25 cents in 1969. The employers agreed to contribute 15 cents an hour to a health and welfare fund for all hours worked effective in 1967 and 15 cents in 1968 to a pension fund. The Teamsters’ agreement for 2,000 drivers in the area provided a $1.20-an-hour package increase in the Mil waukee area and up to $1,625 in other areas of the State, thus narrowing the differential to 18 cents by the end of the contract term. The first year’s wage increase was to be 20 cents an hour in the Milwaukee area and range from 28 to 32 cents in the rest of the State. Contributions for holidays were raised 5 cents and the vacation fund con tribution went to 20 cents an hour, from 10 cents. A pen sion plan was to be established in the third year of the contract. The Laborers’ agreement for 3,400 also narrowed the Milwaukee-upstate differential by increasing wages in the Milwaukee area by 80 cents and those in the lowest paid areas by $1.24. The pay scale differential was to be nar rowed to 18 cents an hour in the fourth year when the scale will range from $4.15 to $4.33. Reportedly, the contractors agreed to pay 15 cents to establish a pension plan, and in Milwaukee payments to the vacation and health and welfare funds were each to go to 15 cents from 10 cents. In the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, the Associated General Contractors signed 3-year agreements with the Carpenters and the Iron Workers, while the Association of Plumbing Contractors and the Mechanical Contractors Association signed with the Plumbers. The pact for 6,000 Carpenters provided a 95-cent-an-hour package increase. Hourly scales were in creased 10 cents effective May 16; 15 cents on September 1, 1966 ; 25 cents in May 1967; and 30 cents in May 1968. Employer contributions were advanced 5 cents an hour effective May 1, 1967, to the health and welfare fund, 5 cents May 1,1968, to the pension fund, and 5 cents May 1, 1968 to the vacation fund. The previous scale was $4.03 M in n e a p o lis -S t. P a u l, M in n e s o ta . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 an hour plus 40 cents in benefit contributions. The in creases totaled 21.4 percent, or 6.7 percent annually. The $1.05-an-hour settlement for 1,000 Iron Workers ended a 5-day strike. Wages were increased 18 cents an hour effective June 1, with additional raises of 17 cents effective October 1, 1966, and 35 cents in both May 1967 and May 1968. The increase totaled 23.1 percent, or 7.2 percent annually. The 3-year 96-cent-an-hour agreement with the Plumbers and Pipefitters provided 1,600 workers in Minneapolis with a 15-cent-an-hour increase in wages effective May 1, 1966, 10 cents in October 1966, 10 cents in January 1967, 30 cents in May 1967, and 30 cents in May 1968. Pro visions also included a 1-cent-an-hour employer contri bution effective July 1, 1966, to establish an apprentice ship training fund. In mid-June, Local 370 ac cepted a 5-year contract to end a 15-day strike against the Idaho Chapter of the Associated General Contractors. The agreement provided 1,500 workers with wage in creases ranging from $1.47 an hour for oilers to $1.79 for large crane operators over a 5-year span. The package in crease for crane operators totaled 41.29 percent, or 7.2 percent annually. I d a h o O p e r a tin g E n g in e e r s . Early in May, the Associated Plumb ing and Air Conditioning Contractors in Southern Nevada and the Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 525 signed a 3-year $1.20-an-hour package agreement—54 days before the old contract expired. The agreement, covering 1,100 workers, provided a 23-cent-an-hour scale increase July 1, 1966 and 10 cents on January 1, 1967. Fringe benefit costs were to increase 12 cents on July 1, 1966. Additional increases of 40 cents effective July 1967 and 35 cents effective July 1968 were to be distributed between fringes and wages as designated by the members. N e v a d a P lu m b e r s . S a n F r a n c is c o P lu m b e r s . The final terms of a contract for construction plumbers in four Bay Area counties, in cluding San Francisco, were announced in early June. By 1972, the 6-year contract will provide nearly $20,000 in wages and fringe benefits for a full year of work. In the first year, the package increase is 58 cents with the Plumb ers getting a 24jcent-an-hour wage increase, and hourly fringe contributions going up 34 cents—14% cents for pen sions, 12 cents for health and welfare, 1% cents for holi days, 1 cent for vacations, and 5 cents to establish an education and cultural trust fund. Journeymen were guaranteed a raise of at least 50 cents an hour on April 1 of each of the remaining 5 years. “If, however, the average increase in collective bargaining agreements of the other Bay Area United Association Lo cals, except locals which get no increase or those which have not concluded negotiations by September 1 is greater than 50 cents an hour, the excess over 50 cents will be added to wages and fringe benefits.” In the second year of the contract, the wage increase will be 30 cents with the balance going to fringe benefits. The amount of the wage increases for the remaining 4 years was to be determined later. Part of each year’s in- DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS crease will be allocated to pensions, so that by 1972 the monthly pension for workers with 25 years of service will be $500 a month, as contrasted with $150 under the previous contract. The $2,000 death benefit will be in creased to $5,000, and hospital room and board payments increased to $30 from $18 a day. The maximum payment for surgical expenses will be raised from $300 to $1,000. Other benefits were dental care for members’ families, liberalized vacations, an increase to 12 from 10 paid hol idays each year, and financing of homes for retirees at the union’s lake resort. For plumbers currently working a 7-hour day, the min imum increase above the previous scale of $7.64% an hour, including benefits, totaled 40.3 percent or 5.8 percent on an annual basis. L o s A n g e le s E le c tr ic ia n s . The Electrical Contractors in Los Angeles and IBEW Local 11 signed a 3-year 84.6cent-an-hour pact for 6,500 electricians. Scales were in creased 12 cents an hour in June and December 1966, 10 cents in December 1967, 15 cents in June 1968 and December 1968. The employers agreed to increase bene fit contributions by 20 cents an hour beginning July 1, 1967. The trigger for reducing the length of the work week was reduced to a 10-percent unemployment rate in the local industry, from 13 percent. Other Developments In a keynote address to the union’s 28th annual convention in St. Louis, Mo., June 20-22, Joseph A. Beime, President of the Communications Workers, stated that his union would not be bound by the Administration’s 3.2 percent wage guideposts in 1966 negotiations with the Bell System and Western Electric. Mr. Beirne added that the union had gained 30,000 members in the past year, an increase of about 10 percent. President William Pollock, keynoting the 14th biennial convention of the Textile Workers Union in Montreal, Canada, called for the elimination of the wage differential between the textile and other manufacturing industries. He stated that the textile industry was no longer “depressed” and could afford to provide wages and fringes com parable with other industries. In a related devel opment, a resolution was adopted making the abolition of the U.S.-Canadian wage differential in the industry a major bargaining goal of the union. 8 See “T he In te rn a tio n a l L abor Conference of 1966,” pp. 841— 846 of th is issue. * 1966 figures rep re sen t p relim in ary estim ates. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 903 Delegates to the quadrennial convention of the Conductors and Brakemen in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, endorsed in principle a merger with two other railroad operating unions, the Firemen and the Switchmen. The heads of the three unions had already indicated their support of the three-union federation, following a year-long study. The combined organization would have a membership of about 92,000. Clyde F. Lane, former senior vice-president of the Conductors and Brakemen, defeated incumbent George H. Harris and George P. Lechner, a district vice-president, for presidency of the Conductors and Brakemen. Mr. Harris had been appointed to the presidency by the union’s board of directors in May 1964, succeeding Leon J. Wagner, who had retired. On June 16, delegates to a special session of the AFL-CIO Executive Council voted 18 to 6 to sup port the walkout of AFL-CIO delegates from the International Labor Conference in Geneva on June l.8 Rudolph Faupl of the Machinists, who headed the American delegation, led the walkout against the election of Poland’s Leon Chajn to the presidency of the conference. Mr. Faupl later explained that he could not in good conscience participate in a meeting presided over by a Com munist. George Meany, president of the A FLCIO, supported the boycott, but Walter Reuther, president of the Auto Workers, called the walkout “unwise, undemocratic, contrary to AFL-CIO policy, and unauthorized.” He added it was in direct conflict with Administration policy of “building bridges” to the Communist nations of Eastern Europe. The Executive Council also ap proved holding a 3- or 4-day special session in the fall to discuss the federation’s foreign policy. Strike idleness during the first half of 1966 amounted to about 10.5 million man days,9 com pared with 11.2 million in 1965 and 8.2 million in 1964. Several large stoppages in nonmanufactur ing, including the bituminous coal strike, the New York City transit strike, the Firemen’s strike in the railroad industry, and construction industry strikes accounted for a large portion of the idle ness. Some 2,015 stoppages, involving 992,000 workers, began in the first half of 1966. This com pared with 861,000 workers in the corresponding period of 1965 and 670,000 in 1964. During the period, strike idleness amounted to 0.16 percent of the total estimated working time, as opposed to 0.18 percent in 1965 and 0.13 in 1964. Book Reviews and Notes Bias Study Legal Restraints on Racial Discrimination in Employment. By Michael I. Sovern. New York, The Twentieth Century Fund, 1966. 270 pp., bibliography. $6. The title of Professor Sovem’s book will prob ably lead most readers to expect a good deal of legalistic jargon, but this is not the case. Mr. Sovern’s book is clearly written and extremely readable. The problem is well-stated. Negroes are handi capped in employment and occupational status because of (1) employer and union discrimination and (2) inadequate formal and informal (appren ticeship) education. Moreover, discrimination in housing in urban areas compounds the problem. After defining the problem, the author goes on to analyze the situation and suggest substantive and procedural improvements in civil rights legis lation. His discussion includes State legislation, recent Federal civil rights legislation, and the role of the executive branch of government and its ad ministrative agencies. The examination of State fair employment practices legislation emphasizes New York State’s Ives-Quinn law. Case material aptly illustrates its adequate content but inade quate procedures—what the law says means little if there is no way to enforce it. A Negro finds it extremely difficult to convince a State fair employment commission of discrimina tion, and generally accepts a lower paying job rather than bring charges. Mr. Sovern suggests that administrative agencies in the civil rights field might “search out” discriminating employers on their own initiative. But this raises some ques tions: How would this help the Negroes? How would a job applicant learn about these employers ? And if he knew, would he apply for a job with such an employer? Another suggestion is to up grade the quality of commission personnel and to provide the staffs with larger budgets. 904 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Mr. Sovern then turns to Congress and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964. The limitations of title V II are highlighted. For example, since the Civil Rights Act does not render State laws inoperative, Federal and State agencies may operate at cross purposes. The Federal Commission can take a case even though a State has disposed of it; and if the State agency cannot dispose of it within 60 days, the Federal Commission can move in. More over, the Attorney General’s nexus with a State is independent of the Federal Commission’s arrangements. The executive branch of government is also involved in civil rights activity and Mr. Sovern traces the implementation of executive orders from the New Deal era to the present. He argues that Franklin Roosevelt’s wartime executive order was inadequately enforced and made it necessary for “concerned” States to take over in situations in volving racial discrimination. The important role played by the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act in pre venting discrimination by both unions and em ployers is discussed in chapter 6. Some of this discussion is difficult to follow, particularly the sec tion on the role of the NLRB vis-a-vis the courts. Finally, the “effectiveness” of redress available to a jobseeker who has been discriminated against under (1) New York State law, (2) title V II of the Civil Rights Act, (3) the Secretary of Labor, and (4) the NLRA is discussed, using the New York State case of Lefkowitz versus Farrell as an example. Professor Sovern also comments on the overall weaknesses of statutory and adminis trative restraints on racial discrimination in employment. The appendices are very complete, and include title VII, the current executive order, and regula tions on nondiscrimination in apprenticeship. A minor irritant is that footnotes are not at the bot tom of the pages, but in a separate booklet. This is an important study for all concerned peo ple, and it should serve as an example to be fol lowed by other lawyers interested in finding audi ences outside their profession. — J o h n E. D ro tn in g Associate Professor of Industrial Relations State University of New York at Buffalo 905 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTES Long Journey Radicalism in America. By Sidney Lens. New York, Thomas Y. Crowell Co. 1966. 372 pp. $8.95. I t has been said th a t a journey of a thousand miles begins with but a single step. Sidney Lens has w ritten a book about people in America, radi cals who took such first steps, sometimes strong, firm, successful steps, sometimes blundering and floundering steps. In some cases the ensuing jour ney led to disappointm ent of utopias sought but never gained. B ut in other cases the journey was successful, and social change and new forms of social living took place th a t are still w ith us today. As Mr. Lens explains, radicals are those people who act as an antidote to privilege. They lead, plan, or participate in social upheavals to replace unjust societies with equitable ones. Today, the labels “radical” and “communist” are synonymous to the uninformed and overexcitable. B ut as Mr. Lens points out, radicals are not all communists, but instead operate under innumerable philosophi cal flags in dozens of different ways. The chapters in this book about rebels of colonial times and the American ^Revolution show th a t some of the p a triotic, venerated, and certainly noncommunist figures of those periods can also quite legitim ately be called radicals. These radicals helped break the ties with B ritain, and helped make America w hat it is today. H istory books can often be dull, but this is not true here. The subjects discussed are likely in and of themselves, but Mr. Lens adds his own amazing scholarship, his ability to gather and organize thousands of events, names, dates, and places to provide an even more vivid account of radicalism in America from the early colonial period to the present. Though his descriptions are excellent, the author can be taken to task for failing to provide a very penetrating analysis. The facts presented do not really help us to better understand why social movements arise when they do, why some men be come radicals and others do not, or how the processes through which such movements are conceived develop. A discussion on effects of social conditions in m aking radicalism would have been interesting. F o r example, would M arx, if he wTere an American https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis today, still write the Manifesto? O r would he have become a leader of the civil rights movement, or a staunch unionist, or a young “hood,” or maybe a beatnik, or even a conservative business execu tive ? These are difficult issues and questions with more possibility for conjecture than for firm answers. Nevertheless, a chapter at the end of the book th at attem pted to tie together generalizations and some of the data presented in earlier chapters would have been a welcome addition. B ut to be fair, had Lens delved very deeply into these issues he would have been w riting a sociological study rather than a historical one. T h at history was chosen over sociology detracts only somewhat from this work which is in any case a first-class book. — H arry C o h e n Associate Professor of Sociology Iowa State University Indian Agreement Collective Bargaining: A Comparative Study of Developments in India and Other Cou/ntries. By M ary Sur. New York, Asia Publishing House, 1965. vii, 192 pp. $7.75. The title of this book is quite misleading. The first th ird of the text (56 pages) is devoted to a sketchy, rather simplified description of collective bargaining in B ritain, the U nited States, and other countries, but the book is m ainly concerned w ith the development and problems of collective bargaining in India with only a few comparative observations. According to the publisher’s blurb, M ary Sur is a Cambridge-educated Englishwoman who m ar ried an Indian, went to India after W orld W ar I I , and became deeply involved in Indian labor rela tions. She has been Labour W elfare Officer w ith a Calcutta Company, one of the founders of the I n dian Institute of Personnel Management, and a contributor to various economic and industrial relations journals in India. Mrs. Sur has put together in this small volume a brief history of the rise of Indian unionism, col lective bargaining, and government labor policies; a concise description of m ajor collective bargain ing agreements and practices based on available Indian literature and her own observations; a set of four “case studies” which she apparently MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 906 personally gathered by interview; and an assess ment of current problems and trends in the devel opment of unionism in India. H er main point of discussion centers on the fact th a t the initial Indian reliance on compulsory adjudication of labor disputes by government tribunals is gradu ally giving way to emphasis on negotiation and voluntary agreement—a course which she strongly approves. This book contains a good deal of interesting inform ation and thinking about Indian labor re lations. I t is w ritten simply and clearly in a style which practitioners will appreciate. I t is not a technical research study. On the other hand, it takes for granted a considerable knowledge on the p a rt of the reader about Indian political and social life. A reader who is not fam iliar with In d ia ’s federal system, for example, or with the m ajor events leading to and immediately following independence would be advised to do some prior background reading. The book should give pause to those who believe th at American labor relations practices can be readily transplanted in foreign soil. — M ilto n D erber Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations University of Illinois Organizing in the Orient An Introduction to Japanese Trade Unionism. By Alice H. Cook. Ithaca, New York, Cor nell University, 1966. 216 pp. $5. The structure and functioning of Japanese trade unions is the topic of the book and Miss Cook investigates it thoroughly. She includes enough inform ation about how the labor movement in Ja p a n operates to satisfy all but the most demand ing expert. The book begins with a brief review of the im portant differences between the labor climate in the W estern world and in Japan. F o r instance, the Japanese culture pattern of subordinating the individual to the community gave rise to the idea th a t the unity of labor and management should make conflicts unnecessary. F o r this reason, the strike—usually short and scheduled in advance— has developed as “a tactic of harassment and of publicity; it is not m eant to interfere seriously with production.” https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Miss Cook concentrates a great deal of her attention on the three basic levels of the Japanese trade union structure: the enterprise union, the national union, and the national center. Although this array may ostensibly parallel the American case, the locus of power is completely different. As other interested observers of the Japanese labor movement have pointed out before, the enterprise union is by far the strongest com ponent and the national union the weakest. Yet Miss Cook, comparing the work of earlier writers to the inform ation garnered from over one hun dred interviews, makes some new interpretations. Most w riters on Japanese unions, for example, attribute a prim arily political function to the national unions. Miss Cook says th at “it is diffi cult to find much evidence . . . to substantiate this analysis . . . . The national unions initiate little political activity. They have . . . little power or money for carrying out these or any other programs. I t is th eir function to act as middlemen between the planners (the center), and the doers (the enterprise u n ion).” The goal of the national unions is industrial unionism sim ilar to th at found in the United States. The move toward this goal has been slow, however, and Miss Cook identifies some factors th at m ight speed the development of industrial unionism in J a p a n : increasing international com petition, technological development, and a grow ing, industrializing economy. These factors would seem to direct employers to increase pro ductivity by scrapping the system- wherein a worker’s income is determined by age and his job security is never threatened—he remains with the same employer for life. The enterprise loyalty which lifetime employment generates centralizes power in the enterprise union, and Miss Cook antic ipates that the “strong vested interests both of the companies and of the enterprise union leaders in the structure represented by the enterprise union” will keep changes from being made quickly. The biggest push toward change should come from young workers. Youths who have known only postwar J apan see no need to wait until they reach their thirties before they can receive a good wage. The average age of workers in J a p a n ’s large industries is under 30, and a high proportion of workers are under 25. The effects of popula tion control and the trend tow ard longer years of schooling will aggravate already existing labor BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTES scarcities, placing young workers in a position to get the jobs and wages they want, possibly at the expense of older workers. Miss Cook sees trouble for the unions—“the generational cleavage be tween young and m ature workers will be widened and . . . the union . . . may be driven to contra dictory program s if they endeavor to meet the de mands of both groups, rather than merely respond ing to the more rebellious and insistent im portuni ties of youth.” — M a r th a F . R ic h e Office of Publications Bureau of Labor Statistics Push or Pull? Urban Migration and Economic Development in Chile. By Bruce H . Herrick. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965. 120 pp., bibliography. $5. This slim volume contains an impressive amount of inform ation th at should interest labor econo mists, development economists, and regional scien tists. Even th at elusive creature, the intelligent layman, will find much of interest in this book which combines skillful analysis w ith facility of exposition. The author prefaces his study by stating ooncisely the problems of economic development, and outlining several theories of m igration. Through out the study he considers a variety of hypotheses, and indicates whether or not they are supported by the empirical evidence. Chile lies about midway in the spectrum of eco nomic development. In 1960, only 27 percent of its population were in the agricultural sector; its per capita income lies in the $300-$400 range. Like most other L atin American countries, indus trial production has been increasing, although re cent grow th rates have been disappointing. Chile has fewer people per square kilometer than the United States. Each cultivable square kilo meter in Chile must support 1.5 times as many per sons as the same amount of land in this country. Only the central provinces—which account for less them one-third of Chile’s land area—are comfort ably habitable, and more than 90 percent of its people live in this region. As elsewhere in L atin America, there is an ex tremely high degree of centralization. The capital https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 907 city of Santiago contains almost 25 percent of Chile’s population. A nd about one-third of the capital’s residents in 1960 had been born in another province. In H errick’s view, this concentration is the result of a two-stage process. First, there is m igration from the farm to a town or small city, then further m igration to a larger city, such as Santiago. By and large, m igrants do fairly well in term s of employment. I t is evident, however, th at many of them, particularly women, move into relatively low-paying service occupations. Among others, H errick considers the “push” and “pull” hypotheses of migration. H e feels th a t the pull of the city is most im portant for the heavily populated central provinces. B ut in the less hos pitable northern and southern provinces, the bleak economic outlook pushes m igrants to the cities, especially Santiago. These brief comments cannot adequately portray the rich detail of a book which is notable for an absence of verbiage. Professor H errick has skill fully extracted the maximum meaning from a rather skimpy supply of data, and has presented the results in a scholarly, lucid, and useful manner. — W il l ia m H. M ie r n y k Director Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University Summaries of Recent Books The Soviet Worker. By A rvid Broderson. New York, Random House, 1966. 273 pp., bibliog raphy. $2.45. Beginning with the October Revolution of 1917, Mr. Broderson discusses the role of the worker in Soviet society, including sections on form ation of the labor force, working conditions, labor produc tivity, and labor policy. He explains M arxist Leninist theory and the new course for labor since S talin’s death. In the last section, the author dis cusses the successes and failures of Soviet planning so far and analyzes what is needed to achieve their final goal of communism. The combination of his torical outline and ideological analysis provides a good introduction not only to the role of the Soviet worker, but to the composition of the entire Soviet system as well. 908 The Psychology of Vocational Choice. By John L. Holland. W altham , Mass., Blaisdell P u b lishing Co., 1966. 132 pp. $1.95, paperback. The author feels th at theories of vocational be havior are most im portant, or else “we will con tinue to wander aimlessly through our data and the correlates of our favorite tests.” The theory Mr. Holland develops in this book is th a t there are six basic types of personalities and six types of en vironments and vocations. People look for voca tions th at will perm it them to use their own values and attitudes. H olland thus sees interests and vo cational preferences as expressions of personality development. Faces of Poverty. By A rth u r R. Simon. St. Louis, Mo., Concordia Publishing House, 1966. 133 pp, $3.75. This depiction of urban poverty in America a t tempts to make people see poverty “not as a m as sive problem but as hum an suffering.” The first section of the book gives profiles of individuals, their backgrounds, and what they are doing or not being able to do to combat their poverty. The author m aintains th at yesterday poverty was a starting point for better things, but today it is the dead end. Education is inferior in poor sections of cities, children of the poor continue to have poor-paying or no jobs, and housing conditions remain substandard. Mr. ¡Simon suggests th a t the kind of “make-work” jobs now being offered to the upper and middle classes should also be given to the poor as an answer to the unemploy ment problem. The Young Negro in America. By Samuel D. Proctor. New York, Association Press, 1966. 160 pp. $3.95. Dr. Proctor’s discussion begins with 1960, sta t ing th at it was in th a t year th at the Negro made a “vigorous bid for emancipation.” From here he goes on to conjecture where the Negro will be by 1980. Property, education, job opportunities, and segregation are discussed; Dr. Proctor then goes on to analyze how the Negro sterotype will change once these problems have been solved. The author has had work experience in the Office of Economic O pportunity, Peace Corps, and National U rban League, and the knowledge gained in these jobs provide more than sufficient back ground for his book. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 Other Recent Publications Education and Training V o lu n te e r s f o r L e a r n in g : A S t u d y o f th e E d u c a tio n a l P u r s u i t s o f A m e r ic a n A d u lts . By John W. C. Johnstone and Ramon J. Rivera. Chicago, National Opinion Research Center, 1965. 624 pp. (Monograph in Social Research, 4.) $12.50, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago. A symposium. { I n Ameri can Economic Review, Menasha, Wis., May 1966, pp. 538-400. $4.) T h e E c o n o m ic s o f E d u c a tio n . O c c u p a tio n a l D a t a R e q u ir e m e n ts f o r E d u c a tio n P la n n in g : P r o c e e d in g s o f a C o n fe re n c e . Edited by Georgianna B. March. Madison, The University of Wisconsin, Center for Studies in Vocational and Technical Edu cation, 1966. xii, 165 pp. A n E c o n o m ic I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f th e P r i v a t e D e m a n d f o r E d u c a tio n . By M. Blaug. { I n Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, May 1966, pp. 166-182. 15s.) P r o b le m s a n d S t r a t e g i e s of. E d u c a tio n a l P la n n in g : L e s s o n s F r o m L a ti n A m e r ic a . Edited by Raymond F. Lyons. Paris, Unesco, International Institute for Educational Planning, 1965. 117 pp. $3. S t a t e F in a n c ia l S u p p o r t f o r D r i v e r a n d T ra ffic S a f e t y E d u c a tio n . Washington, National Education Asso ciation, National Commission on Safety Education, 1966. 44 pp. Rev. ed. 75 cents. Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Manpower Policy, Evaluation, and Research, 1966. 21 pp. (Manpower Research Bulletin 8.) T r a in in g R e e d s in C o r r e c tio n a l I n s t i tu ti o n s . Y o u th - W o r k P r o g r a m s — P r o b le m s o f P la n n in g a n d O p e r a tio n . By Melvin Herman and Stanley Sadofsky. New York, New York University, Graduate School of Social Work, Center for the Study of Unemployed Youth, 1966. 208 pp. Health and Safety I n te r n a t io n a l O c c u p a tio n a l H e a lth . By Robert Murray. { I n Journal of Occupational Medicine, New York, April 1966, pp. 188-194. $1, Harper & Row, Publish ers, Inc., Hoeber Medical Division.) T h e M a n y F a c e s o f O c c u p a tio n a l H e a lth . By Allan J. Fleming, M.D. { I n Journal of Occupational Medi cine, New York, April 1966, pp. 201-207. $1, Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., Hoeber Medical Division.) BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTES The 909 H e a lth o f th e A m e r ic a n P e o p le . By Forrest E. Linder. ( I n Scientific American, New York, June 1966, pp. 21-29. 60 cents.) R e p o r t o n a n I n q u i r y in to th e I n c id e n c e o f I n c a p a c i ty f o r W o r k : P a r t I I , I n c id e n c e o f I n c a p a c i ty f o r W o r k in D if f e r e n t A r e a s a n d O c c u p a tio n s . London, Ministry The T h e o r y o f C o u n te r v a ilin g P o w e r a s i t A p p lie s to L a b o )\ By William Naumes. ( I n Industrial and Labor Relations Forum, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, May 1966, pp. 107-119. $1.50.) of Pensions and National Insurance, 1965. ccxxiv, 163 pp. $8.40, British Information Service, Sales Section, New York. T h e L a b o r C o n tr a c t a n d th e S a le , S u b c o n tr a c tin g o r T e r m in a tio n o f O p e r a tio n s . (From P r o c e e d in g o f H e w Y o r k U n iv e r s i t y E ig h te e n th A n n u a l C o n fe r e n c e o n L a b o r , pp. 255-324.) Washington, BNA Inc., 1966. H e a lth H a z a r d s in th e W o r k p la c e . By Murray C. Brown, M.D. ( I n American Federationalist, AFL-CIO, M i l it a n t P u b lic S e r v i c e T r a d e U n io n is m i n a N e w S t a t e : T h e C a se o f C e ylo n . By Robert N. Kearney. (In Washington, May 1966, pp. 16-19.) Journal of Asian Studies, Ann Arbor, Mich. (48 Lane H all), May 1966, pp. 397-412. $3.75.) Industrial Relations Labor Force M a jo r C o lle c tiv e P ro ced u res. B a r g a in in g A g r e e m e n ts : A r b i t r a t io n By Rose T. Selby. Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 167 pp. (Bulletin 1425-6.) $1, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. E x p e r i m e n t s in L a b o r A r b i t r a t io n . By ( I n Labor Law Journal, Chicago, Robert Coulson. May 1966, pp. 259-265. $1.35.) By Law Review, Boulder, Colo., Winter 1966, pp. 229-247.) T h e D o c tr in e o f P a s t P r a c ti c e in L a b o r A r b i t r a t io n . Stephen R. Clark. ( I n University of Colorado C o m p u ls o r y A r b i t r a t io n a n d G o v e r n m e n t I n te r v e n t io n in L a b o r D i s p u te s : A S u m m a r y a n d A n a ly s is . By Herbert R. Northrup. New York, National Associa tion of Manufacturers, 1966. 19 pp. 50 cents. B a r g a in in g in E d u c a tio n . By Thomas R. Brooks. ( I n Dissent, New York, May-June 1966, pp. 306-311. 75 cents.) C o lle c tiv e By Wesley A. Wildman and Charles R. Perry. Chicago, University of Chicago, Industrial Relations Center, 1966. 8 pp. (Reprint Series, 124; from Phi Delta Kappan, Janu ary 1966.) G ro u p C o n flic t a n d S c h o o l O r g a n iz a tio n . T r i p a r t i t e C o m m is s io n s in P u b lic I n t e r e s t L a b o r D i s p u te s U n d e r th e M in n e s o ta L a b o r R e la t i o n s A c t. By Joseph Lazar, George Seltzer, Vincent Lombardi. ( I n Labor Edited by B. C. Roberts and J. H. Smith. London, London School of Economics and Political 'Science, 1966. ' 137 pp. 25s., G. Bell and Sons Ltd., London. M a n p o w e r P o lic y a/nd E m p lo y m e n t T r e n d s . A n A c c o u n t o f P r o g r e s s i n M a n p o w e r P o lic ie s . By Gèsta Rehn. ( I n OECD Observer, Organization for Eco nomic Cooperation and Development, Paris, April 1966, pp. 3-10. 50 cents, OECD Publications Center, Washington. ) By Walter Fogel. ( I n Labor Law Journal, Chicago, June 1966, pp. 361-370. $1.35.) L e s s o n s F r o m th e L a b o r M a r k e t. C a n L i v e W i t h th e “L a b o r S h o r ta g e .” By Charles E. Silberman. ( I n Fortune, New York, May 1966, pp. 112-115, 238, et seq. $1.50.) B u s in e s s M a n p o w e r a n d E m p lo y m e n t in B r a z il. By A. B. Araoz. ( I n International Labor Review, Geneva, April 1966, pp. 362-382. 60 cents. Distributed in United States by Washington Branch of ILO.) A s p e t t i D e m o g r a fic i d e lla M a n o d o p e r a e d e ll a O c c u p a zio n e . By Romolo Lenzi. ( I n Rassegna di Statistiche del Lavoro, Confederazione Generale della Industria Italiana, Rome, November-December, 1965, pp. 334341.) $1.35.) S o m e D e t e r m i n a n ts o f th e L e v e l o f F r i c ti o n a l U n e m p lo y m e n t: A C o m p a /r a tiv e S t u d y . By Vladimir Stoikov. ( I n International Labor Review, Geneva, May 1966, S e c o n d a r y C o n s u m e r P ic k e tin g — F o llo w in g th e S tr u c k P r o d u c t. By Donald S. Engel. ( I n Virginia Law pp. 530-549. 60 cents. Distributed in United States by Washington Branch of ILO.) Law Journal, Chicago, May 1966, pp. 297-309. Review, Charlottesville, Va., March 1966, pp. 189-230. $2 .) E m p lo y e r 's D u t y to F u r n is h E c o n o m ic D a t a to U n io n s — R e v i s i t e d . By Max J. Miller. ( I n Labor Law Jour nal, Chicago, May 1966, pp. 272-279. $1.35.) https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis S o m e A s p e c ts o f J a m a ic a n E m ig r a ti o n to th e U n ite d K i n g d o m , 1 9 5 3 -1 9 6 2 . By Gene Tidrick. ( I n Social and Economic Studies, University of the West Indies, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Jamaica, March 1966, pp. 22-39. $1.75.) MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 910 W o r k m e n ’s C o m p e n s a tio n — A L o n g J o u r n e y F o r w a r d . By John T. Thornton. { I n Journal of Occupational Med Labor Organizations D i r e c to r y o f N a tio n a l a n d I n te r n a t io n a l L a b o r U n io n s in th e U n ite d S t a t e s , 1965. Washington, U.S. Depart ment of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 100 pp. (Bulletin 1493.) 55 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. T h e O r ig in s o f W e s t e r n W o r k in g C la s s R a d ic a lis m , 1 8 9 0 1905. By Melvyn Dubofshy. { I n Labor History, icine, New York, April 1966, pp. 208-213. $1, Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., Hoeber Medical Division.) I n t e r s t a t e V a r ia tio n s in E m p lo y e r s ' C o s ts o f W o r k m e n 's C o m p e n s a tio n : E f f e c t o n P la n t L o c a tio n E x e m p lifie d in M ic h ig a n . By John F. Burton, Jr. Kalamazoo, Mich., W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Re search, 1966. 75 pp. Single copies free. Tamiment Institute, New York, Spring 1966, pp. 131154. $2.) Wages and Hours Personnel Management By Helen B. Shaffer. Wash ington, Editorial Research Reports, 1966. 17 pp. (1966, Vol. I, No. 21.) $2. G u a r a n te e d I n c o m e P la n . P la n n in g f o r B ig C h a n g e s J u s t A h e a d . By { I n Personnel Administrator, Berea, Peter Drucker. Ohio, March- April 1966, pp 29, 31-35.) By William E. Management of Personnel Quarterly, University of Michigan, Bureau of Industrial Relations, Ann Arbor, Mich., Spring 1966, pp. 16-23.) J o b E n l a r g e m e n t : A n t i d o te to A p a th y . Reif and Peter P. Schoderbek. { I n Job S a t i s f a c ti o n : I s s u e s a n d P r o b le m s . By Glenn P. Fournet, M. K. Distefano, Jr., Margaret W. Pryer. { I n Personnel Psychology: A Journal of Applied Research, Durham, N.C., Summer 1966, pp. 165-183. $2.50.) E le c tr o n ic D a t a P r o c e s s in g a n d th e P e r s o n n e l F u n c tio n : T h e P r e s e n t a n d th e F u tu r e . By Charles E. J. Cas sidy. { I n Personnel Journal, Swarthmore, Pa., June 1966, pp. 352-354. 75 cents.) Productivity and Technological Change T h e E c o n o m ic s o f T e c h n o lo g ic a l C h a n g e. By Anne P. Carter. { I n Scientific American, New York, April 1966, pp. 25-31.) A u to m a tio n a n d M a n u f a c tu r in g E m p lo y m e n t: A R e a p p r a is a l. By Leonard Rico. { I n Management of Per sonnel Quarterly, University of Michigan, Bureau of Industrial Relations, Ann Arbor, Mich., Spring 1966, pp. 2-10, bibliography.) Social Security F in a n c in g S u p p le m e n ta l U n e m p lo y m e n t B e n e fit P la n s . Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 19 pp. (Bulletin 1488.) 20 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. The L o n g -T e r m U n e m p lo y e d : I n te r s ta te Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 122 pp. (Bulletin 1430-83.) 60 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. W a g e C h r o n o lo g y : A n t h r a c it e M in in g I n d u s tr y , 1 9 3 0 -6 6 . Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. ,15 pp. (Bulletin 1494.) 20 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. U n io n W a g e s a n d H o u r s : M o to r tr u c k D r iv e r s a n d H e lp e r s , J u l y 1, 1965 a n d T r e n d 1 9 3 6 -6 5 . Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 36 pp. (Bulletin 1488.) 30 cents, Superin tendent of Documents, Washington. I n d u s t r y W a g e S u r v e y — W o o d H o u s e h o ld F u r n itu r e , E x c e p t U p h o ls te r e d , M a y - J u n e 1965. B y Frederick L. Bauer. Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bu reau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 60 pp. (Bulletin 1496.) 40 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. A r e a W a g e S u r v e y : T h e B ir m in g h a m , A la ., M e tr o p o lita n A r e a , A p r i l 1966. Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1966. 20 pp. (Bulletin 1465-56.) 20 cents, Superintendent of Doc uments, Washington. Other recent bulletins in this series include the metropolitan areas of Cincinnati, O hio-Ky.-Ind.; Canton, Ohio; Los Angeles-Long Beach and Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, C alif.; Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N .Y .; Milwaukee, W is.; Phoenix, Ariz. (Bulletins 1465-57 through 1465-62.) Various prices. C la im a n ts . Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Employment Security (in cooperation with Employ ment Security Commission of Arizona), 1966. 115 pp. (Special TEUC Report 4; BES U-225-4.) https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis W a g e s a n d R e la t e d B e n e f its : P a r t I I , M e tr o p o lita n A r e a s , U n ite d S t a t e s a n d R e g io n a l S u m m a r ie s , 1 9 6 4 -6 5 . W a g e S e t tl e m e n t s in C a lif o r n ia U n io n A g r e e m e n ts , 1965. San Francisco, California Department of In dustrial Relations, Division of Labor Statistics and Research, 1966. 69 pp. BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTES 911 Miscellaneous O r g a n iz a tio n a l R e la tio n s a n d M a n a g e m e n t A c tio n — C a se s a n d I s s u e s . By Garret L. Bergen and William V. F i f t y - T h i r d A n n u a l R e p o r t o f t h e U n ite d S t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f L a b o r , F is c a l Y e a r 1965. Washington, 1906. 222 pp. 65 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington. By Dor othy M. Saffell. Washington, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Standards, 1966. 75 pp. (Bulletin 177, revised.) L a b o r O ffices in th e U n ite d S t a t e s a n d C a n a d a . P r o c e e d in g s o f th e E i g h te e n th A n n u a l W i n t e r M e e tin g o f t h e I n d u s t r i a l R e la tio n s R e s e a r c h A s s o c ia tio n , N e w Y o r k , D e c e m b e r 2 8 -2 9 , 1965 a n d I n d e x o f I R R A P u b lic a tio n , 1 9 6 1 -6 5 . Edited by Gerald G. Somers. Madison, The Association (University of Wisconsin, Social Science Building), 1966. 390 pp. $4. P a p e r s a n d P r o c e e d in g s o f th e S e v e n ty - e ig h th A n n u a l M e e tin g o f t h e A m e r ic a n E c o n o m ic A s s o c ia tio n , N e w Y o r k , N .Y ., D e c e m b e r 2 8 -3 0 , 1965. Edited by Harold F. Williamson and Gertrude Tait. ( I n American Economic Review, Menasha, Wis., June 1966, entire issue. $4.) E c o n o m ie s o f th e W o r ld T o d a y : T h e ir O r g a n iz a tio n , D e v e lo p m e n t, a n d P e r f o r m a n c e . By Clair Wilcox, Willis D. Weatherford, Jr., Holland Hunter, Morton S. Baratz. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1966. 171 pp. 2d ed. $1.95, paperback. By Chester A. Morgan. Homewood, 111., Dorsey Press, 1966. 677 pp., bibliographies. Rev. ed. $11.35. L a b o r E c o n o m ic s. L a b o r E c o n o m ic s : E f f e c ts o f M o r e K n o w le d g e . posium. ( I n American Economic Review, Wis., May 1966, pp. 559-600. A sym Menasha, G u a r a n te e d I n c o m e M a in te n a n c e : A D is c u s s io n o f N e g a t i v e I n c o m e T a x P la n s . By Helen O. Nicol. ( I n Welfare in Review, U.S. Department of Health, Edu cation, and Welfare, Welfare Administration, Wash ington, April 1966, pp. 1-10. 35 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington.) a n d L a b o r . Report of the DirectorGeneral to the International Labor Conference, 50th session, Geneva, 1966. Geneva, International Labor Office, 1966. 94 pp. (Report I, Part I.) $1. Dis tributed in United States by Washington Branch of ILO. I n d u s tr ia l i z a t io n Report of the Director-Gen eral to the International Labor Conference, 50th ses sion, Geneva, 1966 and 20th report of the International Labor Organization to the United Nations. Geneva, International Labor Office, 1966. 93 pp. (Report I, Part II.) $1. Distributed in United States by Washington Branch of ILO. A c t i v i t i e s o f th e I L O , 1965. By John F. Cronin, S.S. and Harry W. Flannery. New York, Hawthorn Books, Inc. 1965. 160 pp., bibliography. $3.50. T h e C h u rc h a n d th e W o r k in g M an . P a r t ic i p a ti o n o f th e P o o r : S e c tio n 2 0 2 ( a ) ( 3 ) — O r g a n iz a tio n s U n d e r th e E c o n o m ic O p p o r tu n ity A c t o f 1961). ( I n Yale Law Journal, New Haven, Conn., March 1966, pp. 599-629. $2.50.) $4.) ( I n Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London, February 1966, pp. 4-76. 12s. 6d.) T h e B r i t i s h E c o n o m y : 1965 to M id -1 9 6 1 . T h e R o le o f C o o p e r a tiv e s in th e E c o n o m ic a n d S o c ia l D e v e lo p m e n t of D e v e lo p in g C o u n tr ie s . Geneva, International Labor Office, 1966. 55 pp. (Report IV (2) prepared for International Labor Conference, 50th session, 1966.) 75 cents. Distributed in United States by Washington Branch of ILO. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Haney. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1966. 756 pp. $9.75. By Mollie Orshansky. ( I n Social Security Bulletin, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administra tion, May 1966, pp. 3-38. 25 cents, Superintendent of Documents, Washington.) M o r e A b o u t th e P o o r in 1 9 6 I f . A G u id e to C u r r e n t R e s o u r c e s f o r A n t i p o v e r t y P r o g r a m s : A S e le c te d B ib lio g r a p h y . New York, Richard J. Bernhard Memorial Library, Federation Employment and Guidance Service, May 1966. 50 pp. 50 cents. Current Labor Statistics TABLES A. —Employment 913 914 919 923 A -l. A-2. Estimated total labor force classified by employment status and sex Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry A-3. A-4. 923 A-5. Production or nonsupervisory workers in nonagricultural establishments, by industry Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry division and selected groups, seasonally adjusted Production workers in m anufacturing industries, by m ajor industry group, seasonally adjusted 924 A-6. Unemployment insurance and employment service program operations B. —Labor Turnover 925 B - l. Labor turnover rates, by m ajor industry group C.—Earnings and Hours 928 941 941 C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers, by industry C-2. C-3. 942 944 C-4. C-5. Average weekly hours, seasonally adjusted, of production workers in selected industries Average hourly earnings excluding overtime of production workers in m anufacturing, by m ajor industry group Average weekly overtime hours of production workers in m anufacturing, by industry Indexes of aggregate weekly man-hours and payrolls in industrial and construction activities 944 C-6. Gross and spendable average weekly earnings of production workers in manufacturing D. —Consumer and Wholesale Prices 945 D -l. 946 D -2. 947 D -3. 948 950 951 D -4. D -5. Consumer Price Index— U.S. city average for urban wage earners and clerical workers (including single workers) all items, groups, subgroups, and special groups of items Consumer Price Index— U.S. city average for urban wage earners and clerical workers, selected groups, subgroups, and special groups of items, seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index— U.S. and selected areas for urban wage earners and clerical workers (including single workers) Indexes of wholesale prices, by group and subgroup of commodities Indexes of wholesale prices for special commodity groupings D-6. Indexes of wholesale prices, by stage of processing and durability of product E. —Work Stoppages 952 E -l. Work stoppages resulting from labor-management disputes F.—Work Injuries F -l. Injury-frequency rates for selected m anufacturing industries 1 1 This table is included in the January, April, July, and October issues of the Review. N o t e : With the exceptions noted, the statistical series here from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are described in Techniques of Preparing Major B L S Statisti cal Series (BLS Bulletin 1168,19Ô4), and cover the United States without Alaska and Haweii. 912 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A.—EMPLOYMENT 913 A.—Employment T able A -l. Estimated total labor force classified by employment status and sex [In thousands] Estimated number of persons 14 years of age and over 1 Employment status 1966 June May Apr. Annual average 1965 Mar. Jan. Feb. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1964 1965 Total, both sexes Total labor force. 82,700 79,751 78,914 78,034 77,632 77,409 78,477 78, 598 78,713 78, 044 80,163 81,150 80,683 76,971 Civilian labor force___________________ 79,601 76,706 75,906 Unemployment__________ _________ 3,870 2,942 2,802 Unemployment rate seasonally adjusted 4.0 4.0 3.7 Unemployed 4 weeks or less________ 2,738 1,651 1,448 Unemployed 5-10 weeks..................... 521 552 364 Unemployed 11-14 weeks__________ 145 137 209 Unemployed 15-26 weeks__________ 231 482 307 Unemployed over 26 weeks________ 236 295 297 Employment______________________ 75,731 73,764 73,105 Nonagricultural—____ ____________ 70, 543 69,472 68,900 Worked 35 hours or more_________ 54,914 54,391 53,189 Worked 15-34 hours______________ 7,906 8,409 8,576 Worked 1-14 hours__________ ____ 3, 514 4,363 4,249 With a job but not at work 3............. 4, 210 2,310 2,887 Agricultural____ _________________ 5,187 4,292 4,204 Worked 35 hours or more................ . 3, 657 2,806 2,809 Worked 15-34 hours_____ _____ _ 1, 056 995 925 Worked 1-14 hours______________ 404 387 369 With a job but not at work 3______ 71 105 102 75,060 3,037 3.8 1,339 611 339 438 310 72,023 68,244 53,831 7,880 4,276 2,258 3,780 2,406 908 336 129 74, 708 3,158 3.7 1,425 792 256 404 281 71,551 67,939 53, 079 8,219 4,336 2,304 3, 612 2,128 802 429 253 74, 519 3,290 4.0 1, 701 673 238 383 296 71, 229 67, 652 52,976 8,137 4, 271 2,268 3, 577 2,105 866 407 200 75,636 2,888 4.1 1,442 614 233 334 266 72, 749 69,103 54,807 8,114 4,330 1,850 3,645 2,353 779 342 170 75,803 2,966 4.2 1,620 589 226 257 274 72,837 68, 709 49,347 12, 657 4,538 2,167 4,128 2, 773 859 352 145 75,953 2,757 4.3 1,407 571 191 286 302 73,196 68,242 52, 746 8,726 4,326 2,444 4,954 3,376 1,087 389 102 75,321 2, 875 4.4 1,599 405 262 295 314 72,446 67, 668 53, 666 7,281 3, 876 2,843 4, 778 3,233 963 436 145 77,470 3,258 4.5 1,612 745 287 296 316 74,212 69,077 51,108 7, 313 3, 093 7, 562 5,136 3, 617 955 394 169 78,457 3,602 4.5 1,888 948 180 250 337 74,854 69,228 50,539 7,402 3,373 7,912 5,626 3,933 1,168 404 119 78, 003 4,287 4.7 2, 696 634 196 384 378 73, 716 68,094 52,867 7,448 4, 012 3,765 5, 622 3,866 1, 243 402 108 78,357 74,233 3,876 5.2 1,787 797 319 490 482 70,357 65,596 48,421 9,877 3,971 3,326 4,761 3,079 1,101 409 169 75,635 3,456 4.6 1,718 707 276 404 351 72,179 67,594 51,611 8,590 4,027 3,368 4,585 3,027 1,011 391 157 54,405 52,135 51,748 51,180 50,911 50, 778 51,148 51, 200 51,481 51, 398 53,360 54,019 53, 395 51,118 49,123 48,773 48,240 48, 021 47,922 48,340 48,438 48,753 48, 706 50, 697 51,356 50, 746 48,410 1,537 1,556 1,847 1,909 1,963 1,726 1,528 1,462 1,507 1,801 2,069 2,315 2,271 47,586 47,217 46,393 46,112 45, 959 46,615 46,910 47,290 47,199 48, 896 49,287 48, 431 46,139 44,090 43,684 43,168 43,014 42,890 43,509 43, 559 43,456 43,436 44,801 44,903 44, 015 42,255 37,042 36,497 36, 730 36,159 36,137 37,153 34,122 36,441 37, 044 36, 046 35,920 37, 018 33,854 3,721 3,718 3,333 3.605 3, 653 3,373 6,280 3, 727 3,085 3,293 3,305 3,213 4,811 1,932 1,789 1,764 1,826 1,693 1,802 1,807 1,788 1,571 1,311 1,465 1,797 1,679 1,395 1,680 1,341 1,424 1,406 1,181 1,350 1,500 1,735 4,151 4, 213 1,986 1,911 3,496 3,533 3,225 3, 098 3,069 3,106 3,351 3,835 3, 763 4, 095 4,384 4, 416 3,884 2,448 2,513 2,167 1,879 1,883 2,114 2,428 2,841 2,712 3,092 3,357 3,321 2,705 672 637 666 602 656 550 522 638 594 553 652 710 709 279 287 276 373 348 280 272 259 325 300 275 298 323 94 95 115 242 182 162 128 97 130 153 101 87 147 49, 014 1,980 47,034 43,304 35,808 3,870 1,686 1,939 3,729 2,638 643 306 141 Males Total labor force........................... Civilian labor force___________ Unemployment................ ......... Employment.......................... N onagricultural____ ____ _ Worked 35 hours or more__ Worked 15-34 hours______ Worked 1-14 hours_______ W i t h a j o b b u t n o t a t w o r k 3. Agricultural.......................... . Worked 35 hours or more___ Worked 15-34 hours_______ Worked 1-14 hours_______ With a job but not at work 3. 51, 340 2, 010 49,330 45, 282 38,081 3, 560 1,473 2,168 4,048 3,116 577 294 62 51,705 Females Total labor force......... ........ ........ . 28,295 27,617 27,166 26,855 26,721 26,631 27,329 27,398 27,231 26,646 26,804 27,132 27,288 25,854 26,653 Civilian labor force__________ _ U nemployment.......................... Employment________________ Nonagricultural____________ Worked 35 hours or more___ Worked 15-34 hours_______ Worked 1-14 hours......... ...... With a job but not at work 3. Agricultural.................... .......... Worked 35 hours or m o re.... Worked 15-34 hours_______ Worked 1-14 hours________ With a job but not at work 3 28, 261 1,860 26,401 25, 262 16,832 4, 345 2,041 2,043 1,139 541 478 26,621 1,476 25,145 24,289 15,798 4,721 2,341 1,428 856 388 367 85 16 27,584 1,405 26,179 25,382 17,348 4,689 2,431 915 797 354 323 110 107 9 12 27,133 1,245 25,888 25,216 16,691 4,858 2,461 1,207 671 293 288 82 8 26,821 1,190 25,630 25,075 17,100 4,546 2, 513 917 555 240 242 60 14 26, 687 1,249 25, 438 24,924 16,920 4,614 2, 510 880 514 246 199 56 1 Estimates are based on information obtained from a sample of households and are subject to sampling variability. D ata relate to the calendar week containing the 12th day of the month. The employed total includes all wage and salary workers, self-employed persons, and unpaid workers in family-operated enterprises. Persons in institutions are not included. Because of rounding, sums of individual items do not necessarily equal totals. 1 Unemployment as a percent of labor force. 3 Includes persons who had a job or business but who did not work during the survey week because of illness, bad weather, vacation, or labor dispute. Prior to January 1957, also included were persons on layoff with definite instructions to return to work within 30 days of layoff and persons who had https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 26, 597 1,327 25, 271 24, 762 16,837 4,485 2,578 863 508 223 208 60 11 18 27,296 1,162 26,134 25, 595 17,653 4,741 2,531 669 539 240 229 62 8 27,365 1,438 25,926 25,149 15,227 6,377 2,731 817 777 344 337 80 17 27,200 1,295 25,905 24,786 16,306 4,998 2,538 944 1,119 536 450 130 5 26, 615 1,368 25,246 24,232 16, 620 4,195 2,307 1,108 1,015 519 369 26,773 1,457 25,316 24, 275 15,061 4,019 1,784 3,410 1,041 528 403 111 95 16 16 27,101 1,534 25,567 24,325 14,619 4,098 1,910 3, 700 1,242 576 516 130 18 27,257 1,972 25,284 24, 079 15,848 4,235 2, 218 1,779 1, 206 544 533 105 25,823 1,605 24,218 23,341 14,566 5,066 2,294 1,414 877 378 391 87 21 21 new jobs to which they were scheduled to report within 30 days. Most of the persons in these groups have, since that time, been classified as unem ployed. N o t e : For a description of these series, see Explanatory Notes (in Employ ment and Earnings, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, current issues). Figures for periods prior to April 1962 are not strictly comparable with current data because of the introduction of 1960 Census data into the esti mation procedure. The change primarily affected the labor force and em ployment totals, which were reduced by about 200,000. The unemployment totals were virtually unchanged. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 914 T a b l e A-2. Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [In th o u san d s] June2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Annual average 1965 1966 Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 -- 63,966 63,028 62,500 61, 826 61, 212 61,041 62, 660 62,029 61,786 61, 515 60,960 60, 694 60,848 60,444 58,156 628 641 640 633 629 627 640 628 631 617 613 615 644 626 585 Mining _____________________ 84. 3 83. 3 79. 4 85.2 84.3 82.9 83.6 83.9 84.3 83.4 83.5 83.8 85.2 84.1 Metal* m in in g ______________________ 26.1 24. 7 26.4 26.9 26.7 26.7 26.2 26.5 25.4 24.7 24.3 24.7 26.3 25.0 Jr on nrp.s 30.4 29.9 27.1 29.4 29.3 30.8 30.1 30.9 31.1 31.2 31.5 31.7 31.7 31.7 riopppr ores 142.8 104.8 141.8 142.9 143.0 143.9 144.6 143.4 136.0 139.7 138.7 141.6 142.4 147.5 Cnal mining 95.7 132.1 132.8 132.8 133.3 133.8 132.7 125.4 129.4 127.5 131.1 131.9 136.0 133.8 "RitliminojiR 274.0 274.5 275.3 275.3 277.3 280.9 279.0 278.2 281.1 287.8 290.5 288.4 282.4 289.4 Prude petroleum and natural gas 149.1 149.7 149.8 149.8 150.3 151.5 151.4 151.9 154.6 158.0 158.2 156.8 154. 4 159.6 Crude petroleum and natural gas fields. 124.9 124.8 125.5 125.5 127.0 129.4 127.6 126.3 126.5 129.8 132.3 131.6 128.1 129.8 Oil and gas field services 124.3 121.9 114.2 110.6 113.2 119.2 123.1 124.5 126.6 127.4 127.1 125.3 119.8 116.7 Quarrying and nonmetallic mining-----44.4 42.1 43.4 44.1 40.8 41.8 45.4 45.1 44.7 38.8 36.9 38.9 42.7 43.8 Prustled and broken stone 39. 8 39. 5 42.3 41.0 38.7 43.1 42.8 43.1 43.3 35.8 34.9 36.3 39.8 40.9 Sand and gravel _ _ ______ 3,476 3,412 3,211 3,056 Contract construction. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3,559 3,311 3,191 3,015 2,851 2,974 3,203 3,375 3,465 3,495 3,575 1,105. 3 1, 081. 2 1, 024. 9 956. 6 1,073.5 1, 044. 5 993.9 940.0 988.1 1, 058. 7 1, 083.1 1, 098. 6 1,111.5 1,140. 3 General building contractors _________ 669.3 608.9 513.7 467.9 500.6 582.0 681.2 730.9 740.9 768.8 737.8 724. 7 634.1 610. 5 Heavy construction _______ ________ 396.4 385.1 319.7 312.4 393.1 414.2 390.4 349.1 271.8 340.0 292.9 221.5 197.3 217.4 Highway and street construction._____ 329.3 316.0 292.2 270.6 283.2 310. 2 332.1 340. 5 347.8 354. 6 341. 4 339. 6 314.4 298.1 Other heavy construction _ 1,568.2 1,537. 4 1,507. 6 1,443. 0 1,485.7 1, 562. 3 1, 610. 7 1,635.5 1,642. 7 1, 665. 5 1,633.1 1,606. 3 1,552. 3 1,488. 4 Special trade, contractors _ _ _ _____ Plumbing, heating, and air condition374.2 370.1 367.1 360.2 369.5 377.9 381.7 385.7 382.9 387.8 383.4 375.0 371.5 355.8 lug _ _____________ Painting, paperhanging, and deco133.7 127.2 121.6 116.3 117.6 132.3 142.9 151.8 157.3 161.0 151.4 150.1 139.2 139.3 _____________ rating 248.4 246.0 241.5 237.6 239.1 246.1 246.8 245. 4 247.6 251. 9 247. 5 239.5 239. 4 220.6 Electrical work Masonry, plastering, stone, and tile 240.6 237.5 237.0 214.1 215.1 234.1 244.2 252.3 257.2 255.9 253.4 250.6 241.4 241.6 work _ _ _ 98.5 106.6 116. 2 118. 5 120.1 117.9 120. 2 116. 8 114.9 111.8 108.0 108.7 108.2 106.0 TJonfing and sheet metal work 18,443 18,412 18,428 18,211 18,016 18,027 17,984 17,259 Manufacturing.. _ . . . . . . . . . 19,135 18,843 18,709 18, 588 18,457 18,274 18,415 718 10,686 10,623 10,608 10,410 10,416 10,437 10,379 9,813 Durable g o o d s______ ________ _ . . 11,276 11,121 11,027 10,910 10, 812 10,697 10, 7,697 7,757 7,789 7,820 7,801 7,600 7,590 7. 604 7,446 7,645 7, 577 7,859 7,722 7,682 7, 678 Nondurable goods _ _____________ Total employees___________________ Durable goods 246.4 243.8 241.7 237.4 235.4 232.1 236.1 247.1 Ordnance and accessories ____ _ . . . 268.7 265.5 260.3 257.4 255.1 250.8 244.8 187.6 186.3 183.9 181.7 179.2 178. 3 175.9 178.8 186.9 Ammunition, except for small arms___ 199.0 197.1 195.0 193.1 191.9 189.3 14.2 12.8 12.7 12.5 12.1 12.8 12.4 12.3 13.0 12.6 13.2 13.4 13.7 13.8 Sighting and fire control equipment__ 44.4 47.2 47.3 44.1 44.9 46.0 47.4 44.8 48.5 45.8 50.9 50.0 51.6 54.6 55.7 Other ordnance and accessories______ Lumber and wood products, except 643.8 620.7 611.8 604.1 597.4 597.7 608.5 614.8 617.8 624.5 633.3 628.6 627.6 606.1 602.5 furniture____ . . . . ___ __ 91.0 89.9 85.6 86.7 94.1 91.3 92.9 94.1 80.6 81.9 82.7 98.6 90.6 83.7 Logging camps and logging contractors. 253.4 256.9 260.4 258.8 260.8 251.0 253.3 SawmiUs and planing mills _____ . 259.3 251.3 251.4 248.9 244.7 247.4 250.3 252.8 Millwork, plywood, “and related prod 170.1 164.9 164.1 161.4 160.6 160.4 161.6 162.3 163.4 164.2 167.5 165.4 163.9 160.4 157.4 ucts___________________________ 34. 2 34.7 33.7 34.1 34.9 36.3 34.5 33.9 35.0 35.2 34.2 33.8 36.0 35.1 36.7 Wooden containers___ . . ________ 75.8 76.1 75.8 75.4 75.3 74.7 70.1 75.3 75.8 76.1 76.9 76.4 77.9 77.5 79.1 Miscellaneous wood products ____ _ 441.4 439.8 437.6 432.8 425.6 427.6 429.1 405.9 456.4 449.0 446.7 447.3 443.3 442.0 443.2 Furniture and fixtures _____ _______ 331.1 326.8 327.7 326.8 325.1 322.1 323.3 321.6 319. 0 315.9 313.2 306.0 309.0 311. 2 293.1 Household furniture____ _____ _ . 29. 6 29.3 29.3 29.9 28. 8 27.8 28.4 28.6 29.4 30.1 29.1 30.3 30.9 28.6 Office furniture 44.8 44.9 45. 4 43.5 40.3 44.9 43.2 44.3 45.6 45.4 44.8 43.1 45.4 45.0 Partitions; office, and store fixtures 45. 4 45. 7 46.1 44.8 45.1 45.7 46.9 46.8 45.0 46.7 45.1 45.4 45.4 47.6 45.9 Other furniture and fixtures___ _____ 653.4 640.4 633.9 618.6 609.6 611.7 622.6 631.4 635.5 642.9 641.6 636.0 629.6 620.9 611.8 Stone, clay, and glass products________ 32.2 30.8 30.9 33.6 32.5 33.2 33.2 33.2 32.8 33.0 32.7 33.0 32.8 33.1 Flat glass_______ _______ ____ _____ Glasi and glassware, pressed or blown. 121.8 120.2 117.3 115.7 115.0 113.6 113.8 114.7 115.4 115.8 115.9 1,14.6 115.1 113.5 111.5 38.7 38.9 38.3 38.9 39.5 37.9 39.4 39.6 39.7 36.5 35.9 36.1 39.4 37.6 Cement, hydraulic .. . . . ________ 38.3 69.7 70.8 72.5 72.5 73.5 73.3 72.8 71. 2 72.0 70.1 69.2 75.0 71.9 69.8 73.3 Structural clay products _________ 42.4 44.1 42.8 43.3 41.2 41.4 42.3 41.4 44.3 43.0 42.0 43.0 42.7 42.3 Pottery and related p roducts_____ . Concrete, gypsum, "and plaster prod ucts .. . ___________ . 185.5 179.4 176.6 168.4 163.5 166.2 172.5 177.0 179.9 182.5 184.3 181.9 181.2 174.2 172.1 132.7 131.2 132.3 130.4 129.0 128.9 129.6 129.7 129.6 132.6 132.2 131.7 128.8 128.8 126.4 Other stone and mineral products____ Primary metal industries ._ ___ .. 1,344.9 1,325.6 1,317.1 1,299. 2 1,286.9 1,272.7 1, 263. 7 1,255.1 1,270.2 1, 308. 7 1,317.1 1, 319.8 1,322.6 1, 291. 7 1,231. 2 Blastfurnace and basic steel products.. 673.1 660.2 652.6 638.4 626.8 618.9 615.1 613.4 631.2 666.9 686.3 687.4 687.5 660. 2 629.4 212.0 Iron and steel foundries . . ______ 237.9 235.2 234.8 232.7 233.2 231.5 230.7 225.1 225.2 228.3 224.8 225.8 227.9 225.3 69.2 72.1 72.0 73.0 73.3 73.5 72.6 72.3 73.7 73.8 Nonferrous smelting and refining____ 74.1 74.4 76.2 73.9 74.9 Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and ex 191.6 185.2 191.5 192.8 191.2 195.0 196.5 195.8 195.9 truding _ _ _ . _____ _ . 203.6 202 7 202.8 202.1 201.2 198.9 77.8 74.3 77.4 79.0 77.9 76.8 80.4 81.3 79.2 81.2 82. 8 82.6 Nonferrous foundries____ . .. . . . . . 83.3 83.3 83.8 Miscellaneous primary metal indus 64.8 61.0 65.0 63.4 65.3 66.2 67.1 66.4 67.1 68.4 69.0 tries_______ ___________________ 70.3 69.2 69.3 69.3 Fabricated metal products ___ _____ 1,350.8 1,330.5 1,326.6 1, 317. 0 1, 310.1 1,301.2 1,304.3 1,304.3 1, 292. 2 1,285. 8 1,266.9 1,261. 2 1,270. 4 1,260. 5 1,187.3 61. 2 62. 4 65.3 64.9 65.8 65.8 62. ( 60.4 61.5 60.5 64. 4 62.9 62. 2 61.5 Metal cans . _________ ____ 66.1 Cutlery, hand tools, and general hard 154.9 143.9 155.2 150.0 155.1 152.6 159.3 156.3 162.4 160.2 163.0 163. 0 161.2 160.6 158.5 ware___ _______ _ ______ _ _ Heating equipment and plumbing 79.3 80.4 79.9 79.2 80.6 78.8 80.7 80.3 79.6 79.7 80.6 80.0 80.8 82.3 81.0 fixtures . ____ _ 385.2 385.5 389.9 391.3 388.9 388.8 389.5 386.6 380.7 376. 4 354. 8 Fabricated structural metal products. . 405.9 395.1 391.0 385. 89.0 93.1 93.3 92.9 94.4 93.5 95.3 96.4 94.5 96.8 99. C 97.7 101.4 99.5 99.5 Screw machine products, bolts, etc___ 236.2 236.4 237.1 237. £ 236.2 234.8 235.6 234.1 231.2 225.5 211.6 214.1 220.8 221.4 198.5 Metal stampings . _______ 73. 5 7U .6 72.7 72.1 74. 73.1 75.5 76.2 75.8 75.6 78.2 77.6 77.7 78.0 80.3 Coating, engraving, and allied services. 62.1 57.7 62.4 62.3 62.3 63.2 62.7 64.1 64.8 64.7 65. 65.0 65.8 66. 65.8 Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. Miscellaneous fabricated metal prod 138.8 139.7 138.7 140. £ 138.6 130.2 144. £ 145.1 143. C 142.2 141.7 141. 150.1 149. 149. ucts____ ______________________ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A.—EMPLOYMENT T able A-2. 915 Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry ‘—Continued [In thousands] Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Annual average Industry June 2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Manufacturing—Continued Durable goods—Continued Machinery................ ............................. 1,863.9 1,837. 3 1,824. 6 1,812.8 1,798.1 1,778. 7 1,766. 3 1, 749.4 1,730.9 1, 730. 6 1, 719. 7 1, 727. 5 1,722. 4 1,713. 9 1, 606.1 Engines and turbines....... ................. 96.6 95. 5 94.8 94.0 93.5 93.4 92.8 91.8 91.1 90.7 90.9 90.6 87.0 90.4 Farm machinery and equipment_____ 147. 5 147.8 147.9 145.8 142.1 138.9 135.0 131.9 134.0 133.1 134.3 135.8 135.1 126.5 Construction and related m achinery... 269.4 265.3 262.3 260.3 257.7 253.6 252.3 253.8 251.9 253.2 253.4 249.3 250.1 249.5 234.7 Metalworking machinery and equip m en t.____________ ____ ______ 325.8 321.7 320.4 317.8 316.0 310.8 309.0 304.1 300.6 301.4 298.4 299. 7 300.6 298.9 281.4 Special industry machinery_________ 201.5 198. 5 196.9 197.9 197.2 197.2 195.5 194.1 192.8 192.9 192.0 191. 6 191.0 190.9 180.9 General industrial machinery_______ 278.0 273.8 271.8 271.5 269.6 267.5 266.4 263.1 261.7 259.3 262.2 261. 0 260. 5 257.7 243.0 Office, computing, and accounting machines................ .............. ........... 223.1 220.3 218.4 215.8 212.9 211.2 210.3 208.9 205.2 202.5 200.7 197.0 194.1 196.6 174.6 Service industry machines__________ 117.1 114.7 113.3 110.4 110.8 110.7 109.2 108.4 108.9 109.2 109.2 115.8 115.6 111. 1 Miscellaneous machinery...................... 202.3 198.9 198.2 196.4 194.1 191.8 191.3 189.2 186.1 187.0 184.1 183.8 184.1 183.7 105.9 172.2 Electrical equipment and supplies......... 1,918. 8 1,881.3 1, 862. 5 1,829. 7 1,818.8 1, 796. 2 1, 786. 6 1,762.4 1,740.8 1,714. 3 1,679. 5 1, 660. 6 1,658. 2 1, 672. 3 1,548. 4 Electric distribution equipment_____ 195.1 190.6 188. 0 186.2 184.3 183.5 181.7 180.1 178.1 176.7 175.3 173.5 171.1 172.6 162.4 Electrical industrial apparatus........... 214.6 207.4 209.3 207.2 204.8 202.7 201.2 197.4 196.6 195.0 194.3 194.9 193.7 192.5 178. 1 Household appliances_____________ 184. 0 185. 0 182. 6 169.3 178.9 173.8 174.4 170.6 168.8 166.9 161.0 165.2 166.6 161.1 Electric lighting and wiring equipment 186.4 183.4 181. 6 179.8 177.8 175.4 175. 1 173.9 171.6 170.4 165.3 164.3 166.2 167.4 166. 7 156.4 Radio and TV receiving sets________ 170.4 161.9 159. 7 158.9 158.4 158.6 159.9 157.6 155.2 151.4 145.5 138.1 137.3 139.9 120.0 Communication equipment............... 483.6 476.0 470. 8 465.3 458.9 455.1 450.6 444.6 439.1 433.9 428.4 425.4 423.7 428.0 411.6 Electronic components and accessories 378.0 371. 0 366. 0 359.4 353.3 344.9 338.5 332.6 325.0 315.0 308.1 301.1 299.8 304.4 264.9 Miscellaneous electrical equipment and supplies...................... ....................... 106.7 106. 0 104. 5 103.6 102.4 102.2 105.2 105.6 106.4 105.0 101.6 98.1 99.8 100.9 94.0 Transportation equipment___________ 1,901.4 1,910.1 , 896. 0 1,887. 6 Motor vehicles and equipment_______ 895.2 888.9 892.1 Aircraft and parts________ ________ 727.3 725.5 717. 7 706.7 Ship and boat building and repairing.. 170.7 172.5 173.7 177 Railroad equipment________________ 59. 0 58. 5 57.2 Other transportation equipm ent........ . '57.9 57. 2 54.1 888.2 694.1 177.1 56.5 53.0 1,840.4 1,839. 0 1,823.9 1,795.3 1, 777. 6 1, 650. 7 1, 721.1 1,741. 9 1, 739. 1, 604.8 878.8 896. 5 896.5 884.7 872.9 759.8 851.0 865.3 853.6 755.4 680.5 666.8 651.8 637.0 632.2 622.9 615.7 603.3 617.8 603.7 173.3 165. 0 163.3 163.4 160.0 156.1 143.1 161.5 159.0 145.1 57.0 56.6 56.7 56.2 53.9 55.0 54.6 54.9 55.4 50.1 50.8 54. 0 55.7 56.3 54.3 57.3 56.4 56.4 56.3 50.6 Instruments and related products______ Engineering and scientific instruments. Mechanical measuring and control devices_______________________ Optical and ophthalmic goods_______ Ophthalmic goods...... ................... . Surgical, medical, and dental equip m e n t........................................ ...... Photographic equipment and supplies. Watches and clocks________________ 425.6 418.9 72.3 414.3 71.4 411.8 71.8 407.6 71.6 402.5 70.8 400.0 70.6 397.2 69.9 394.0 70.4 392.8 70.0 389.8 69.8 387.1 69.4 384.2 69.0 385.0 69.2 369.3 69.6 106.6 48. 9 104.9 49. 2 33.9 104. 4 49. 4 34.2 103.2 48.9 33.9 102.3 48.5 33.6 101.4 47.7 32.9 101.0 100.5 47.3 32.7 99.0 47.0 32.5 100.2 46.7 32.2 99.9 45.5 31.2 100.3 45.4 31.2 100.1 45.9 31.7 99. 4 46.1 31.7 96.4 43.5 29.5 64.9 64.2 92.3 36. 0 63. 5 90.9 34. 7 62.8 89.8 35.3 61.9 88.7 34.6 60.8 87.3 34.5 86.2 34.4 59.8 85.6 34.1 58.9 85.1 33.6 58.4 84.3 33.2 57.8 84.8 32.0 57.5 83.7 30.8 57.6 81.0 30.6 57.6 81.5 31.4 54.6 75.9 29.4 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries.. Jewelry, silverware, and plated w are... Toys, amusement, and sporting goods. Pens, pencils, office and art materials.. Costume jewelry, buttons, and notions. Other manufacturing industries....... Musical instruments and parts____ 448. 0 47.5 441.6 47.2 126.3 35.2 55.3 177.6 26.8 432.7 47. 2 118. 8 35.2 54. 8 176. 7 26. 6 424.7 46 112.9 35.0 54.6 175.4 26.7 416.6 46.2 108.1 34.4 54.0 173.9 26.4 403.0 44.8 102.4 32.9 51.4 171.5 26.4 438.9 46.2 128.4 35.4 55.1 173.8 26.4 459.7 46.2 146.1 35.5 56.3 175.6 26.2 462.2 46.2 149.0 34.8 56.1 176.1 25.8 451.2 45.6 141.5 34.3 54.8 175.0 25.3 440.7 44.8 134.9 34.0 55.0 172.0 24.7 412.8 41.8 122.5 33.0 51.4 164.1 24.1 420.3 44.2 424.1 44.6 122.4 33.4 53.9 169.8 24. 7 398.5 43.4 106.5 31.9 54.8 161.9 21.9 179.8 47.6 32.9 60.2 120.8 32.8 53.5 169.0 24.4 Nondurable goods Food, and kindred products...................... 1, 712. 5 1,663. 0 1,658. 0 1, 656. 8 1,654.8 1, 670.1 1, 721. 9 1, 779.8 1,822.6 1,859.1 1,854. 4 1, 776. 5 1,722. 5 1, 737. 2 1,745. 8 Meat products_____ _______________ 304.3 299.3 295. 8 296.2 298.3 299.7 311.3 316.1 315.7 312.9 313.4 309.9 306.0 308.3 313.6 Dairy products............ ........ ........ ......... 285.1 278.0 276. 6 274.3 273.6 274.0 277.1 277.9 281.3 287.1 294.5 295.4 293.3 284.7 288.6 Canned and preserved food, except m eats................................................ 227.9 231. 4 224.5 226.1 229.2 242.1 279.6 315.7 371.4 289.2 241.3 262.4 254.1 Grain mill products...___ __________ 125.1 120.8 120.3 121.3 121.2 120.9 121. 7 122.7 126.4 126.6 360.7 126.9 126.5 127.8 124.6 127.4 Bakery products.................................. 279.6 275.9 276. 0 277.2 276.0 277.2 279.2 282.2 283.2 282.9 284.8 288.1 286.5 283.6 289.9 Sugar____________________________ 33.3 31.8 30.3 30.7 47.4 51.1 41.0 35.9 30.2 30.8 48.8 29.5 29.7 37.6 75.9 Confectionery and related products .. 72.3 76.1 71. 0 70.3 82.6 83.9 76.0 77.3 81.1 83.3 77.1 77.4 69.9 72.5 Beverages________________________ 233.4 223.9 220. 6 217.3 211.5 212.4 218.1 222.1 224.6 225.2 227.2 228.0 226.1 220.1 216.1 Miscellaneous food and kindred prod ucts........ ............ . 137.4 135.9 136.3 138.1 138.9 139. 7 142.4 144.2 143.6 141.1 139.6 140.0 139. 3 140.2 141.0 Tobacco manufactures. 79.2 88.1 72.8 71.4 75.8 73.3 81.6 98.2 83.7 89.3 97.8 86.7 73.9 74.4 89.1 Cigarettes_________ 37.2 37.8 37.8 36.8 37. 7 37.4 38.4 37.9 37.7 38.6 37.8 37.6 37.3 37.9 Cigars......................... 21.8 23.5 21.7 21. 7 21.5 21.5 23.4 23.3 23.8 22.3 23.0 23.8 25.3 23.3 Textile mill products________________ 960.2 949. 5 945.3 941.1 933.9 927.0 933.5 937.6 935.0 931.8 929.3 914.4 924.2 919.5 891.1 Cotton broad woven fabrics_________ 240.3 237. 5 236. 7 236.4 235.8 235.5 235.3 233.5 232.0 231.0 231.1 230.4 230.8 230.7 226.8 Silk and synthetic broad woven fabrics. 94. 5 93. 5 93.4 93.5 92.7 90.6 90.9 92.3 91.6 92.9 90.1 90.4 90.8 89.7 92.6 Weaving and finishing broad woolens.. 44.8 43.1 44.3 44. 0 44.1 43.5 43.8 43.7 43.0 43.9 43.1 44.8 43.5 44.3 43.3 Narrow fabrics and smallwares . 31. 0 30.8 29.1 30. 6 30.4 29.8 29.6 29.3 29.5 29.6 30.2 27.8 29.2 27.9 29.8 Knitting___________________ _____ 242. 0 239.4 237.2 232.9 228.1 223.5 230.0 238.5 240.4 239.6 239.1 231.7 233.9 230.1 215.1 Finishing textiles, except wool and knit. 76.4 75.9 74.4 75. 5 75.1 74.9 75.6 74.2 74.7 74.3 76.1 74.8 74.5 74.5 76.3 Floor covering________ _____ 42.1 41. 0 41. 0 41.2 40.6 41.2 40.2 42.0 41.7 41.5 41.7 38.5 39.3 39.5 Yarn and thread_________ ! !!!!!!!” ! 116.6 114.7 114. 0 114.0 113.6 113.4 113.2 112.1 111.0 110.3 110.0 108.1 109.2 109.1 104.6 Miscellaneous textile goods___ 73.2 72.4 72. 91 73.5 70.2 71.0 72.4 71.4 72.4 67.4 70.2 72.7 70.6 73.3 69.3 See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 916 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 T able A-2. Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry 1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. [in thousands] 1965 1966 Annual average Industry June2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Manufacturing—C ontinued Nondurable goods—Continued Apparel and related products_________ 1,419. 5 1, 395. 5 1, 376. 9 1, 398. 0 1, 388.6 1,329.4 1,371.1 1,380. 5 1,380.3 1,380. 3 1, 374.1 1,311.6 1,355.9 1,351.2 1,302. 0 Men’s and boys’ suits and coats______ 122.4 121.6 120.4 121.2 120.8 119.7 121.2 119.5 118.0 120.5 120.1 112.3 120.7 118. 6 114.7 Men’s and boys’ furnishings_________ 374.6 369.2 365.4 364.3 360.9 357.0 357.7 359.5 359.3 358.6 358.6 347.8 354.8 350.7 327.7 Women’s, misses’, and juniors’ outerwear____________________ ___ 429.0 422.4 412.3 428.5 428.8 396.7 416. 5 414.8 415.6 419.1 420.9 399.3 413.4 412.3 404.3 Women’s and children’s undergar130.4 128.8 128.6 128.3 126.8 121.7 127. 0 129.6 129.2 128.3 127.0 118.5 124.0 124.5 121.4 ments__________________________ 29. 6 28.9 32.2 32.0 28.9 30.3 26.1 27.1 29.7 30.7 31.4 30.0 28.0 Hats, naps, and millinp.ry 30.1 75.9 78.3 77.2 81.8 79.4 85.2 81.6 79. 0 77.8 80.8 78.8 79.0 80.0 78.7 81.9 Girls’ and children’s outerwear______ 75. 2 79.2 73.8 68.9 75.0 76.7 75.7 79.3 77.1 79.1 75.4 Fur goods and misop.llaneons apparel 77.5 72.8 72.1 Miscellaneous fabricated textile prod168. 0 170.7 163.5 159.3 166.4 160.9 169.0 169.5 167.6 169.8 165.0 152.2 158.6 157.7 154.0 ucts______________________ ____ Paper and allied products_____________ 671.9 656.8 654.9 651.5 649.0 647.6 651.3 649.1 647.0 646.9 644.4 640.6 639.0 637.5 625.2 Paper and pulp____________________ 218.4 212.4- 211.7 210.8 210.2 210.1 211. 0 210.1 210.3 211.9 215.1 215.2 213.9 211. 0 213.0 68. 0 67.9 68.5 68.2 67.5 68.6 66.5 67.9 68.1 66.6 69.7 68.7 68.2 68. 7 68.8 Paperboard_____________________ Converted paper and paperboard 161. 6 160. 9 162.0 161.1 159. 8 160.0 160.2 157.3 155.8 156.8 151.7 products________________________ 168.3 164.6 165.0 163.2 Paperboard containers and boxes------- 215.5 211.1 210.0 208.8 208.0 207.8 210. 7 210. 2 208. 7 206.4 202.6 200.2 201.2 202.2 193.9 Printing, publishing and allied industries. 1, 022. 7 1, 010.8 1, 009. 6 1, 001. 2 999.4 993.0 999.1 995.4 989.6 984.1 981.4 978.8 975.3 977.3 950.5 354.3 351.1 352.5 347.0 350. 6 349.2 352. 6 350. y 350. 6 347.6 347.6 348.7 346.7 345.9 336.0 Newspaper publishing and printing. . 70. 5 70. 5 70. 0 70.9 70.2 70.1 69.6 68.2 69. 0 68.3 71. 2 70.7 68.5 Periodical publishing and printing 70.9 81. 0 80.1 82.9 81.6 79.6 80.2 79.6 84.7 84.2 79.7 79.6 79.1 76.6 85.0 ____ _______ _____ Books . Commercial printing___ . . . ---- -- 325.7 322.4 320.9 320.1 316.1 315.1 317. 0 315.8 313.2 311.5 307.5 306.5 307.1 309. 0 301.9 52. 3 52. 2 52.4 51.8 51. 4 52.1 51.3 55.5 53.6 53.8 51.6 53.2 49.1 53.4 52.7 Bookbinding and related industries---Other publishing and printing indus129.0 127.5 127.0 125.6 12b« 5 125.1 125.7 12 5 .9 124. 8 123.6 123.3 122.8 122.1 122.4 118.6 tries___ ________________________ Chemicals and allied products_________ Industrial chemicals________ ____ . . . Plastics materials and synthetics____ Drugs____ . . . _ _ ____ _ . . . Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods______ Paints, varnishes, and allied products.. Agricultural chemicals ________ _ . . . Other chemical products____________ 947.5 298.6 214.0 122.7 107.5 67.3 49.0 88.4 941.6 295.2 211.1 120.5 105.3 66.1 57.7 85.7 937.6 294.8 210.3 119.8 101.8 65.4 61.3 84.2 929.8 293.5 209.7 119.7 101.0 65.0 57.6 83.3 918.9 292.0 207.8 119.2 102.5 64.4 52.1 80.9 912.7 290.2 206.7 118.6 103.0 63.8 50.1 80.3 912.3 291.8 206. 0 118.8 103. 0 64.3 48.9 79.5 909.4 289.8 205.1 118.0 104.5 64.8 48.2 79.0 907.2 288.7 203.4 117.4 105.6 64.8 48. 5 78.8 912.5 290.1 204.7 117.6 106.2 65.9 48.8 79.2 918.0 293.6 204.5 118.6 106.3 67.3 48.3 79.4 913.9 292.6 202.3 118.2 105.1 67.2 48.4 80.1 903. 5 288.8 199.9 112.8 105.0 66.7 51.1 79.2 902.3 288.6 199.1 115.3 104. 0 65.3 51. 5 78.6 877.4 288.0 183.1 112.1 101.1 64.0 51.0 78.1 Petroleum refining and related industries. Petroleum refining.. _________ _____ Other petroleum and coal products___ 181.6 143.1 38.5 177.6 140.9 36.7 175.3 140.2 35.1 173.3 139.9 33.4 173.0 139.9 33.1 172.8 139.8 33.0 174.7 140.8 33.9 176.6 141.3 35.3 178.4 141.4 37.0 180.6 143.1 37.5 182.5 144.7 37.8 182.4 145.1 37.3 180.0 144.4 35.6 178.0 143. 2 34.9 182.7 148.4 34.4 Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products____________________________ Tires and inner tubes. _____________ Other rubber products______________ Miscellaneous plastic products_______ 505.4 110.0 181.3 214.1 495.6 107.3 179.1 209.2 492.1 105.4 177.4 209. 3 487.9 105.1 177. 5 205.3 484.3 104.8 177.1 202.4 484.3 106.0 177.8 200.5 485. 0 106.1 177.9 201. 0 482.6 106.0 176.3 200.3 476.4 104.9 174.5 197.0 471.7 103.9 172.6 195.2 466.7 103.3 170.3 193.1 456.8 100.0 168.7 188.1 461.9 100.1 171.8 190.0 463.7 102.1 171. 6 190. 0 433.6 99.0 163.7 170.9 Leather and leather products_________ Leather tanning and finishing_______ Footwear, except rubber____________ Other leather products______________ Handbags and personal leather goods. 365.2 32.0 240.0 93.2 360.6 31.7 237.0 91.9 37.5 359.0 31.7 235.3 92.0 38.0 362.8 32.0 238.7 92.1 39.3 363.7 32.1 240.3 91.3 38.7 358.1 32.4 237.6 88.1 36.5 360.0 32.6 236. 6 90.8 37.6 359.3 32.4 234.0 92.9 39.5 354.2 32.1 230.1 92.0 39.1 355.5 32.1 231.6 91.8 38.8 360.7 31.7 237.0 92.0 38.5 351.2 31.2 233.0 87.0 35.4 353.4 31.4 233.5 88.5 36.3 353.8 31.7 233.3 88.8 37.4 348.4 31.4 230.5 86.5 37.8 4, 165 4, 111 718 1 623 6 267. 2 81.4 104. 2 41. 9 991.2 76. 9 255. 0 228.3 18. 6 325.9 912. 9 762. 9 32. 6 111.0 622.5 253. 6 154.9 175.6 38.4 4, 075 714 8 619. 6 268 4 81.9 107. 6 41. 4 974.6 75. 7 251. 8 225. 2 18. 6 317.4 908. 8 759. 3 32.1 111.0 621.3 253.0 155.1 175.0 38.2 4,054 710 7 615. 8 271 9 82 7 109. 6 40. 9 970.5 78. 0 247. 6 221. 4 18. 6 314. 3 901. 4 753. 0 31. 9 110.1 619. 0 251.9 154. 9 174. 6 37.6 4,034 710 5 614 6 272 4 82 6 110 7 40 7 961.7 77. 6 246. 3 220. 5 18. 7 311. 4 895.9 747.9 31. 8 109.8 617. 5 251.1 154. 6 174. 4 37.4 4,025 717 6 623 7 4,087 4,091 4,104 4,112 741.3 732 6 730 5 632 4 633. 6 640 2 643.6 273 0 272 8 270 0 970 Q 269.7 82 7 83. 0 83. 2 83 2 83.7 110 4 110. 1 107. 8 107 3 106.5 41 4 42 0 43.3 41. 7 41.1 992.7 1 , 000.7 1, 005. 4 1, 000. 6 9 5 4 .1 81.6 78 8 84. 5 89. 3 87 8 242 1 243. 2 240. 5 237 6 236.0 216 2 216. 6 214. 8 212. 7 211.4 19.5 18 8 18. 9 18. 9 19 0 308 3 312. 5 320 8 321 1 322.1 891 6 893. 6 891. 8 889. 9 892.8 744.6 745. 0 743. 6 741. 7 744.5 31.2 31. 6 31. 2 31. 0 31.0 109. 4 110. 6 110. 6 110. 8 110.9 619.1 620. 6 617. 9 621. 6 629.8 251.4 251.9 248.8 251.8 255.2 154.9 155.6 155. 6 155. 8 157.9 175. 0 175.3 175. 6 176.1 178.4 38.3 37.8 37.9 37.9 37.8 4,098 749.6 652.2 251.6 82.8 105.1 43.7 984.8 76.2 234.4 210.5 19.9 316.1 902.9 755.9 31.1 109.5 638.7 258.4 160.8 180.8 38.7 4,083 749.3 652.5 247.9 82.9 100.7 43.6 986.1 77.6 233.0 209.4 20.0 311.8 901.2 755.0 31.3 108.5 633.7 258.2 156.8 179.8 38.9 4,070 747.0 650.8 263.1 83.4 106.6 42.5 977.7 77.7 229.3 206.6 20.0 320.5 884.5 739.9 31.3 106.9 627.4 255.3 156.8 176.8 38.5 4,031 737.0 639.8 266.8 83.2 108.0 41.8 964.6 80. 5 230. 7 207.1 19.4 309.8 882.2 736.6 31.2 108.1 620.5 251.8 155.1 175.7 37.8 3,947 756.1 665.0 266.8 83.9 109.2 42.0 919.8 82.2 212.7 190.8 20.0 310.4 848.0 706.1 32.4 103.1 613.6 248.6 153.2 174.1 37.7 Transportation and public utilities______ Railroad transportation_______________ Class I railroads 3__________________ Local and interurban passenger transit__ Local and suburban transportation___ Taxicabs__________ . _ __________ Intercity and rural bus lines.... ........... Motor freight transportation and storage. Public warehousing________________ Air transportation_____________ _____ Air transportation, common carriers___ Pipeline transportation _________ . . Other transportation__ ______________ Communication___ . . . . . . ______ . Telephone communication__________ Telegraph communication ____ _____ Radio and television broadcasting.. ._ Electric, gas, and sanitary services____ Electric companies and' systems______ Gas companies and systems_________ Combined utility systems___________ Water, steam, and sanitary systems___ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A.—EMPLOYMENT T able A-2. 917 Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. [inthousands] 1966 1965 Annual average Industry June 2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Wholesale and retail trade______________ 13,076 12,918 12,883 12,700 12,617 12,716 13,638 12,960 12,736 12,639 12,574 12,583 12,596 12,588 12,132 Wholesale trade----- -------------------------- 3,381 3,321 3,314 3, 3Ò5 3,299 3,3Ó3 3,345 3, 326 3,321 3,307 3,312 3,301 3,269 3,263 3,173 Motor vehicles and automotive equip 255.3 254.4 254.1 253.2 254.2 254.6 253.6 252.5 252.7 254.0 253.2 251.5 250.8 244.2 m ent........... ............... ......................— 200.4 200.1 199.8 199.0 198.8 201.9 199.6 198.3 197.6 197.6 196.4 195.5 196.1 191.4 Drugs, chemicals, and allied products— 143.6 142.8 143.2 142.3 140.0 142.1 141.8 141.2 140.1 141.1 139.8 138.5 138.5 133.8 Dry goods and apparel_______ ______ 485.3 482.4 483.1 482.5 492.1 502.5 504.5 506.6 502.6 494.8 509.7 507.7 494.6 492.5 Groceries and related products.............. 271.0 269.9 267.8 266.2 263.1 265.7 262.2 260.4 261.9 264.0 261.8 257.9 257.2 242.7 Electrical goods_____ ____ ______ ___ Hardware, plumbing, and heating 154.8 154.7 154.2 154.1 153.2 153.9 153.6 152. 5 152.1 152.7 152.3 150.6 150.2 145.9 goods.............................................. 593.2 591.6 586.6 581.9 578.7 577.1 574.5 573. 4 573.8 574.2 573.9 568.4 565.6 544.9 Machinery, equipment, and supplies. . 1,141.0 1,139.5 1,135. 2 1,132.9 1,128.7 1,142.9 1,137.9 1,135.6 1,131.0 1,136. 2 1,128.1 1,118.0 1,117.7 1, 076. 6 Miscellaneous wholesalers............... Retail trade_______ _______ _________ 9,695 9,597 9, 569 9,395 9, 318 9,413 10, 293 9,634 9,415 9, 332 9,262 9, 282 9,327 9,325 8,959 1,879.5 1,879. 6 1, 838. 7 1, 817.1 1,908.0 2,483. 2 2, 060. 4 905. 0 1,838. 3 1, 786. 4 1, 778. 8 1, 793.9 1,869.2 1, 761. 5 General merchandise stores__________ 1,184.1 1,177.1 1,152. 7 1,138. 5 1. 200.1 1, 579. 7 1,289. 5 1,186.3 1,139. 7 1,110. 2 1,108. 3 1,115.5 1,164.9 1, 086. 2 Department stores_______________ _ 112.4 114.4 116.0 118.4 130.1 162.9 148,5 129.7 118.3 112.0 109.4 108.5 119.5 108.3 Mail order houses_______ _____ _____ 312.1 318.2 308.8 300.3 313.5 413.4 341.2 314.1 306.9 296.0 293.9 300.3 314.5 309.2 Limited price variety stores-------------1,542.2 1, 532.9 1, 533. 5 1, 527.1 1, 518.0 1, 537.9 1,509. 6 1,492.6 1, 469. 7 1,450.1 1, 464. 7 1,468. 4 1,473.4 1, 419. 9 Food stores________________ ________ 1,371.4 1,360.9 1, 364. 1 1, 356. 6 1,351.8 1,359.4 1,338. 5 1,324.9 1,302. 8 1, 285. 6 1,297. 3 1, 297.8 1,303. 9 1, 251. 7 Grocery, meat, and vegetable stores.. . 634.2 652.2 616. 1 607.7 628.6 762.4 648.9 629.9 621.7 598.7 595.2 620.9 630.9 614.3 Apparel and accessories stores-------------108.0 109.1 106.3 109.3 114.0 140.4 110.6 105.4 103.5 101.3 101.6 104.2 106.5 100.1 Men’s and boys’ apparel stores............ 229.8 229.5 222.6 218.5 226.2 271.0 236.3 231.1 226.5 220.9 217.0 225.0 229.8 228.3 Women’s ready-to-wear stores— ......... 100.2 100.3 98.2 102.2 131.4 105.5 100.8 99.3 98.3 96.6 97.4 102.7 104.2 103.2 Family clothing stores______________ 123.8 139.8 118.0 113.4 117.3 138.3 121.6 119.8 122.5 115.0 115.0 118.7 120.7 116.5 Shoe stores________________________ 418.8 418.0 418.5 417.9 418.3 437.3 423.0 417.3 411.8 409.5 407.4 405.8 410.1 394.4 Furniture and appliance stores________ 270.8 270.1 269.5 269.3 270.0 283.8 273.9 270.0 266.7 265.6 263.9 264.4 266.0 255.1 Furniture and home furnishings......... 1,985.2 1,949.7 1,899. 8 1, 871. 5 1,858.2 1,898. 5 1,900. 2 1,910.8 1,938.3 1,955.3 1,964. 7 1,966. 9 1,898.4 1, 836. 7 Eating and drinking places_______ ____ 3,136.2 3, 088. 7 3,076. 7 3, 081. 5 3,173. 5 3, 091. 4 3, 059. 2 3, 052. 5 3, 062.1 3, 071. 0 3, 070. 8 3, 042. 6 2,932. 6 3,137.1 Other retail trade__________ _________ 553.2 549.6 537.5 528.4 533.4 548.1 548.8 547.0 551.2 562.0 562.3 553.7 541.0 532.7 Building materials and hardware------1,456.6 1, 450.2 1, 441. 4 1, 439.1 1, 443. 5 1,451.6 1, 442. 6 1,433.5 1, 432. 7 1,437. 2 1, 442. 6 1, 440. 7 1,424.0 1,366. 0 Auto dealers and service stations-------744.2 745.9 746. 2 744.0 743.0 741.0 738.2 734.9 730.1 731.3 733.3 728.8 725.6 692.0 Motor vehicle dealers_____________ 185.7 182.3 176. 7 175.0 178.3 189.0 184. 1 178.4 175.4 178.6 179.2 180.3 176.8 166.8 Other vehicle and accessory dealers.. 526.7 522.0 518.5 520.1 522.2 521.6 520.3 520.2 527.2 527.3 530.1 531.6 521.6 507.1 Gasoline service stations---------------1,136.4 1,127.3 1,109. 8 1,109. 2 1,104.6 1,173. 8 1,100. 0 1,078. 7 1, 068. 6 1, 062.9 1, 066.1 1,076. 4 1, 077. 6 1, 033.9 Miscellaneous retail stores___________ 419.2 419.2 415.3 414.9 417.3 437.7 416.3 409. 6 404.6 401.6 404.0 404.3 406.0 389.3 Drug stores-------------- -----------------108.9 105.8 93.5 92.6 93.2 96.7 102.3 95.8 93.0 93.7 92.8 93.5 94.1 98.2 Farm and garden supply stores------104.8 108.6 113.5 117.5 118.9 115.5 110.8 107.8 103.1 101.5 101.3 102.6 108.3 108.3 Fuel and ice dealers........................... 3,102 799.5 334.9 92. 0 186.3 139.2 Finance, insurance, and real estate______ Banking___________________________ Credit agencies other than banks______ Savings and loan associations________ Personal credit institutions.................... Security dealers and exchanges________ Insurance carriers.____ __________ ____ Life insurance_____________________ Accident and health insurance_______ Fire, marine, and casualty insurance... Insurance agents, brokers, and services.. Real estate_________________________ Operative builders_________________ Other finance, insurance, and real estate. Services and miscellaneous_____ ___ ___ Hotels and lodging places_____________ Hotels, tourist courts, and motels------Personal services____________________ Laundries, cleaning and dyeing plants. Miscellaneous business services.......... . Advertising.______ ___ ____________ Credit reporting and collecting agencies _ Motion pictures_____________________ Motion picture filming and distrib uting___________________________ Motion picture theaters and services__ Medical and other health services______ Hospitals_________________________ Legal services_______________________ Educational services_________________ Elementary and secondary schools___ Higher educational institutions______ Miscellaneous services___________ . . . . . . Engineering and architectural services. Nonprofit research organizations_____ See footnotes at end of table. 224-966 O— 66— — 6 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 481. 6 60.8 334. i 238.7 584.9 82.9 9,461 3,089 798.4 33Ö. 5 93.7 185. 4 137.9 3,075 795.8 336.2 93.8 185.6 136.7 920.5 483. 0 482.7 59. 1 59.3 333.3 333.0 238.1 237. 1 574.6 566.2 4«j. S 44.9 82.8 82.5 3,054 792.3 334.7 93.9 184.0 133.8 918.5 483.2 58.2 331.6 235.3 557.5 43.1 82.0 3,049 790.2 336.3 95.0 184.6 131.0 917.1 483.6 57.8 329.9 233.7 559.0 43.5 81.6 3,064 791.6 336.4 94.5 184.5 131.0 919.0 484.1 57.6 330.9 234.8 568.8 45.7 81.9 3,062 788.8 334.7 94.0 183.2 129.8 919.3 485.1 57.2 330.7 234.2 573.5 46.4 81.5 3,066 787.5 334.3 94.6 182.8 129. C 918.7 485.0 57.1 330.2 234.2 580.3 48.1 81.6 3,073 788.9 333.2 94.4 182.0 128.6 921.6 486.4 57.4 330.9 234.3 584.1 50.1 81.8 3,102 798.0 335.0 95.6 182.4 130.5 927.9 489.2 57.8 333.6 236.5 592.1 50.8 82.1 3,098 794.6 335.2 96.8 181.4 131.1 923.6 486.5 57.6 332.4 236.0 595.7 50.7 82.1 3,062 784.5 330.8 94.8 179.7 129.0 912.5 481.3 57.1 327.8 232.9 591.2 50.1 81.4 3,044 783.1 330.5 94.6 179.4 128.7 913.6 482.8 56.8 328.0 232.7 573.9 46.9 81.4 2,964 764.4 316.0 93.8 166.6 125.8 895.2 475.1 55.9 319.4 225.6 557.8 46.2 79.4 9,348 9,242 9,112 9,030 8,959 9,046 9,054 9,073 9,039 9,062 9,081 9,008 8,907 8,569 714.8 684.2 657.2 651.1 636.9 645.2 648.4 666.7 708.6 799.9 793.3 712.2 678.0 639.9 657.0 631.5 608.9 603.6 589.5 595. 9 598.1 613.3 643.3 679.4 674.6 644.4 613.1 575.0 984.7 978.4 971. 7 966.4 967.6 973.1 976. 1 977.2 973.3 973.0 977.9 978.8 968.3 947.1 546.8 541.3 535. 7 531.4 534.1 538.3 541.2 543.4 542.1 543.3 549.9 551.3 539.9 531.0 1,156.6 1,146.1 1,138. 1 1,128.4 1,113.1 1,127,9 1,110.4 1,105.3 1, 097. 5 1, 090. 0 1, 084.9 1,076. 6 1, 074.9 1, 001. 6 114.1 114.6 114. 5 114.4 113.7 113.6 113.9 114.2 114.0 113.9 115.2 114.1 113.7 110.9 66.2 67.1 67.7 67.7 67.1 65.4 67. 1 66.6 63.0 65.5 66.7 66.1 66.2 66.3 180.2 179.7 173.4 171.6 178.3 183.8 181.4 185.5 192.3 198.3 198.4 189.2 183.0 177.4 57.9 48.5 46.0 42.7 52.0 51.0 52.5 52.5 47.9 50.2 48.0 53.8 46.7 51.7 133.5 131.7 125.5 121.4 124.5 125.9 128.9 133.8 141.3 145.8 146.4 143.2 134.5 134.6 2,251.9 2,248.9 2,237. 0 2,225. 3 2,210. 5 2, 203. 9 2, 202. 3 2,192.9 2,184. 2 2,188. 4 2,189. 0 2,165. 4 2,163. 5 2, 061. 4 1,494.5 1,491.7 1, 488. 7 1, 480. 4 1,471.2 1,469.1 1, 470. 2 1,466.5 1, 460.1 1, 461.1 1, 463. 9 1, 450. 0 1,449. 9 1, 395. 0 184.1 184.0 184. 5 182.9 181.7 184.5 182.8 182.4 183.6 188.0 188.0 181.7 180.6 173.8 1,042. 4 1,039. 4 1, 044. 4 1, 034. 5 1, 022.2 1, 023.8 1, 026.1 1, 005. 9 919.7 825.3 840.5 911.7 942.5 892.3 346.8 345.9 346. 0 345.0 343.8 344. 3 344. C 337.0 318.8 273.4 275.0 312.7 319.3 301.6 624.4 621.6 626.8 618.3 609.8 610.8 612.6 599.8 535.6 489.1 501.1 533.9 556.9 527.9 475.4 476.0 477. 7 472.9 467.1 460.8 457.6 454. 5 458. 5 459.7 457.5 446.2 448.6 425.3 264.7 261.8 260.2 257.2 255.2 252.6 250.7 248.2 250.4 251.7 250.0 243.6 242.6 225.9 62.2 62.4 62.7 63.9 62.9 63.9 62.7 62.7 63.2 63.1 62.6 63.2 63.3 62.8 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST I960 918 T able A-2. Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry 1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. [In thousands] 1965 1966 Annual average Industry Ju n e2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Government__________________________ 10,789 10,769 10,726 10, 667 10, 556 10,427 10, 579 10,413 10,301 10,102 9,698 9,716 10,033 10,051 -9,595 Federal Government L - ....... - ................ 2, 566 2, 513 2,493 2,460 2,431 2,406 2,543 2,402 2,384 2,377 2,408 2,407 2,374 2,378 2,348 2,481. 5 2,461. 5 2,428. 8 2, 399. 7 2,375.4 2,511.8 2,370. 4 2,352. 7 2,345. 2 2, 376.1 2,375.1 2,341.9 2,347. 0 2,317. 5 Executive _________- ______ 1, 001. 5 991.9 980.0 964.8 956.2 951. 6 955.7 949.4 947.3 954.9 951.3 940.8 938.8 933.7 Department of Defense___________ 660.2 652.8 639.5 632.4 624.4 771.5 617.8 608.0 602.8 608.5 604.1 593.9 614.2 599.9 Post Office Departm ent___________ Other agencies __________________ 819.8 816.8 809.3 802.5 794.8 788.7 796.9 795.3 795.1 812.7 819.7 807.2 793.9 783.9 26.2 26.4 25.9 25.4 24.5 25.0 25.8 25.4 25.2 24.9 25.6 25.4 25.6 25.4 Legislative_____________ _________ 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.0 Judicial_________ -- _____________ State and local governm ents__________ 8, 223 8, 256 8,233 8, 207 8,125 8, 021 8,036 8, Oil 7,917 7,725 7, 290 7,309 7,659 7,673 7,248 2,124. 7 2,111.9 2,109. 6 2, 092.9 2,064.6 2, 066. 2 2, 065.9 2, 045. 9 1,990. 5 1, 932. 8 1,935. 4 1, 979.3 1,981.5 1,855. 6 State government.- ___ __________ 798.0 794.0 793.2 779.5 761.9 764.0 765.9 745.3 662.5 582.8 590.5 661.9 683.1 608.9 State education__________________ 1, 326. 7 1,317.9 1, 316. 4 1, 313. 4 1,302.7 1,302. 2 1,300. 0 1,300.6 1,328. 0 1,350. 0 1,344.9 1,317. 4 1, 298.5 1, 246. 7 Other state government___________ 6,131. 7 6,120.8 6, 097. 8 6,032. 3 5,956.7 5,969.8 5,944. 6 5,871.2 5, 734. 3 5,357. 0 5,373.9 5, 679. 2 5,690.8 5,391. 8 Local government______ __________ 3, 513. 6 3, 517. 5 3, 504. 7 3, 451.0 3,388.6 3,394.9 3,369. 7 3,301.1 3,124. 7 2, 681.1 2,694. 7 3, 068. 5 3,125. 5 2, 906. 5 Local education__ ____ _________ 2, 618.1 2,603. 3 2, 593.1 2, 581.3 2, 568.1 2, 574.9 2, 574.9 2, 570.1 2,609. 6 2, 675. 9 2,679. 2 2,610. 7 2,565. 3 2,485. 3 Other local government___________ 1 Beginning with the January 1966 issue, figures differ from those previously published. The industry series have been adjusted to March 1964 bench marks (comprehensive counts of employment). For comparable hack data, see Employment and Earnings Statistics for the United States, 1909-65 (BLS Bulletin 1312-3). Statistics from April 1964 forward are subject to further revision when new benchmarks become available. These series are based upon establishment reports which cover all fulland part-time employees in nonagricultural establishments who worked during, or received pay for any part of the pay period which includes the 12th of the month. Therefore, persons who worked in more than 1 establishment during the reporting period are counted more than once. Proprietors, selfemployed persons, unpaid family workers, and domestic servants are excluded. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2 Preliminary. 3 Beginning January 1965, data relate to railroads with operating revenues of $5,000,000 or more. 4 D ata relate to civilian employees who worked on, or received pay for the last day of the month. 5 State and local government data exclude, as nominal employees, elected officials of small local units and paid volunteer firemen. S o u r c e : U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for all series except those for the Federal Government, which is prepared by the U.S. Civil Service Commission, and that for Class I railroads, which is prepared by the U.S. Interstate Commerce Commission. 919 A.—EMPLOYMENT T able A-3. Production or nonsupervisory workers in nonagricultural establishments, by industry 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [in thousands] Annual average 1965 1966 Industry June2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 490 70.8 22.2 26.1 449 69.8 20.9 26.1 479 69. 3 20. 3 26. 1 476 69. 5 20.7 26.0 482 69.3 20.6 25.8 491 69.7 21.3 25.6 495 70.2 22.1 25.4 494 68.9 22.3 24.0 490 69.4 22.4 24.2 501 70.8 22.6 25.3 502 69.9 22.7 24.6 502 70.1 22.9 25.0 492 69.3 22.1 24.6 496 65.8 21.1 22.0 Coal mining________________________ Bituminous___ ____ -............................ 124.8 116.8 87.3 79.2 124.0 115. 4 125.1 116.0 125.1 115.9 126.1 116.5 126.6 116.9 125.5 115.9 118.3 108.8 121.7 112.6 120.7 110.7 123.7 114.5 124.6 115.2 129.9 119.7 Crude petroleum and natural gas______ Crude petroleum and natural gas fields. Oil and gas field services____________ 191.0 83.0 108.0 190.8 83.0 107.8 191. 7 83.4 108. 3 191.7 83.5 108.2 194.3 84.2 110.1 197.2 85.0 112.2 195.7 84.9 110.8 195.2 85.4 109.8 196.9 87.1 109.8 202.3 89.9 112.4 205.1 90.0 115.1 203.7 89.2 114.5 198.4 87.1 111.3 204.2 91.5 112.7 Quarrying and nonmetallic mining........ Crushed and broken stone__________ 103.2 37.2 101.1 36.2 93. 5 32.6 90.1 30.6 92.8 32.5 98.4 35.5 102.5 37.1 103.9 38.1 105.8 38.3 106.6 38.8 106.3 39.0 104.5 37.7 99.4 35.8 96.3 34.5 Mining________ _____________ ________ Metal mining__________ _______ _____ Iron ores---- ------ ------- ------- -----------Copper ores_______________________ Contract construction__________________ General building contractors.................. Heavy construction__________ _______ Highway and street construction_____ Other heavy construction___________ Special trade contractors--------------------Plumbing, heating, and air condition ing— Painting, paperhanging, and deco rating_________________________ Electrical work____________________ Masonry, plastering, stone and tile work_________________________ Roofing and sheet metal work_______ 505 3,057 2,813 2,700 2,525 2,365 2,489 2,717 2,884 2,975 3,008 3,085 2,987 2,927 2,731 2,602 923.7 895.8 846. 3 793.7 841.7 912.6 936.6 952.5 965.1 992.4 957.3 935.4 880.6 823.9 580.6 521.5 426. 9 382.5 415.6 495.7 593. 8 642.3 652.2 679.5 650.0 636.3 547.6 526.5 304.1 256.7 186.8 163.2 183.7 237.0 314.0 354.6 358.3 378.3 361.2 349.6 285.1 278.4 276.5 264.8 240.1 219.3 231.9 258.7 279.8 287.7 293.9 301.2 288.8 286.7 262.5 248.1 1, 308.4 1,282. 5 1, 252. 2 1,188. 5 1,231.6 1,308.4 1,353.4 1,380.3 1,391.1 1,412.9 1,379.9 1,354. 8 1, 302. 9 1,251.2 300.2 299.1 296.3 289.3 298.9 307.5 311.4 314.9 313.5 317.2 312.9 305.1 301.9 287.3 119.4 198.6 113.5 196.2 107.1 191.9 101.4 187.9 102.7 189.8 117.4 197.1 128.0 198.2 137.3 197.1 143.3 199.9 146.7 203.9 137.5 198.6 135.5 191.6 125.0 191.7 125.6 175.6 219.1 87.6 215.8 87.0 215.4 84. 9 192.8 77.5 193.8 85.5 212.9 95.1 222.6 97.2 230.7 99.0 235.6 96.6 234.5 98.9 231.6 95.2 228.5 93.4 220.0 90.9 220.7 87.5 Manufacturing__ _______ _____________ 14,263 14,030 13,917 13, 828 13,727 13,571 13,724 13,770 13,754 13,773 13,540 13,361 13,412 13,376 12,769 Durable goods_____________________ 8,386 8, 267 8,191 8,098 8, 024 7,929 7,968 7,949 7,900 7,887 7,683 7,701 7, 750 7,693 7,209 5,877 5, 763 5, 726 5,730 5,703 5,642 5,756 5,821 5,854 5, 886 5,857 5,660 5,662 5,684 5,560 Nondurable goods__________ ______ Durable goods 98.8 102.2 106.1 128.0 126.4 121.7 120.2 117.8 114.3 108.0 109.9 108.2 106.4 102.3 100.5 Ordnance and accessories_____________ 67.2 69.3 64.8 82.9 75.6 69.0 66.5 82.1 80.3 73.6 72.3 65.8 Ammunition, except for small arms___ 79.2 77.7 70.7 5.0 5.9 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.9 5.3 5. 2 5.3 5.8 5. 7 Sighting and fire control equipment__ 5.1 5. 5 5. 6 30.0 30.9 29.3 39.2 33.4 32.4 30.9 35.7 29.2 32.3 32.4 29.9 38.5 Other ordnance and accessories............. 34.6 35.4 Lumber and wood products, except furniture________________________ 565.2 543.5 534.5 527.4 521.9 521.6 533.1 540.0 543.1 549.5 558.1 553.4 552.6 532.2 530.2 Sawmills and planing mills__________ 237.4 229.7 229.7 227.2 222.7 225.4 228.7 231.1 231.9 235.4 238.6 236.7 238.8 229.5 231.0 Millwork, plywood, and related prod ucts________________________ ... 143.4 138.8 137.7 135.2 134.9 134.4 136.0 136.9 137.8 138.7 141.7 139.9 138.5 135.2 133.4 31.1 31.7 31.2 30.6 30.4 31.8 31.6 32.8 32.9 32.4 Wooden containers_________________ 31.5 30.5 30.6 30.8 30.6 63.9 60.2 64.3 67.8 64.4 64.7 65.2 64.0 65.3 Miscellaneous wood products________ 66.9 66.5 64.8 65.0 65.6 65.9 356.3 337.1 378.5 372.0 370.6 370.8 366.9 366.2 368.5 367.2 366.0 364.0 359.9 353.1 355.3 Furniture and fixtures_______________ 283.2 279.5 280.1 279.7 278.0 275.6 277.4 276.2 273.5 270.7 268.5 261.6 264.6 266.5 251.1 Household furniture_______________ 22.4 21.7 22.3 23.3 23.1 22.7 22.1 24.0 22.8 23.0 Office furniture____________ _____ 22. 5 23.1 23. 6 23.4 32.3 29.7 32.2 34.3 34.1 33.2 32.9 33.1 34.0 Partitions; office and store fixt o e s ____ 33.3 33.2 31.2 32. 9 33.1 35.1 34.5 34.4 36.2 36.8 35.9 34.6 36.2 35.2 Other furniture and fixtures.................. 35.1 35.5 34.8 34.9 34.3 34.6 Stone, clay, and glass products..... ......... 526.0 515.2 509.7 495.7 487.7 489.2 499.6 507.8 511.3 518.9 516.4 511.7 506.9 498.7 492.2 25.9 24.8 26.4 26.8 26.3 25.9 24.8 Flat glass_________________________ 26.4 26.4 26.8 27.0 26.9 26.1 26.1 99.0 97.2 98.8 99.9 101.1 101.3 100.0 100.8 Glass and glassware, pressed or blown. 106.2 104:9 102.4 100.8 100.2 99.1 99.9 29.7 30.3 28.0 30.2 30.7 30.9 31.0 30.8 30.7 Cement, hydraulic____ ____ ________ 29.2 30.0 29.7 29.0 27.4 27.6 59.9 59.2 59.2 61.5 62.3 61.7 61.5 Structural clay products____________ 63.9 62.3 61.0 62.6 61.0 60.0 58.1 58.8 36.1 36.2 37.7 35.1 Pottery and related products___ _____ 35.3 37.2 38.1 36.6 35.0 36.1 36.6 35.9 36.4 36. 8 Concrete, gypsum, and plaster prod ucts__________________________ 143.2 138.0 135.7 128.9 124.7 126.6 132.6 137.2 139.5 141.9 142.9 141.1 140.8 134.3 133.4 96.7 94.8 96.7 97.5 100.0 96.7 Other stone and mineral products____ 99.5 98.9 97.2 100.7 97.1 99.1 100.0 96.8 98.1 Primary metal industries_____________ 1,100.1 1, 082. 2 1, 076. 7 1, 060. 3 1, 049.2 1,035.3 1, 025.9 1, 017.3 1,031.6 1, 068. 9 1,075. 8 1,079. 6 1,084. 7 1,065.0 1, 001.9 540.8 515.8 494.4 511.0 545.3 563.6 565.4 567.1 Blast furnace and basic steel products.. 552.5 540.3 533.8 520.6 509.6 501.3 496.7 Iron and steel foundries_____________ 204.0 200.8 201.2 199. 1 200.0 198.9 197.7 192.3 192.5 195.6 192.1 193.4 195.6 193.2 181.7 66.1 53.3 57.4 56.2 56.4 56.3 57.5 57.1 56.9 Nonferrous smelting and refining_____ 58.7 57.4 58.1 57.7 57.7 57.4 Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and ex 147.4 140.9 151.6 truding_______________________ 150.6 146.5 146.8 148.1 157.5 156.9 157.4 156.9 156.2 153.8 151.1 152.1 65.3 61.7 66.7 68.4 67.9 66.5 65.5 65.0 Nonferrous foundries_______________ 64.5 70.6 70.1 69.8 68.6 70.5 70.1 Miscellaneous primary metal indus 52.2 48.5 53.6 53.4 52.5 51.0 52.6 54.4 54.3 tries____ ______________________ 55.9 55.5 56.8 56.0 56.1 56.2 Fabricated metal products____________ 1, 054. 0 1,037.8 1, 033.1 1, 023. 4 1,018.5 1,011.5 1, 016. 3 1,016. 7 1, 004. 5 998.8 978.6 973.5 984.3 976.0 912.5 51.4 52.6 55.2 56.0 54.6 50.8 52.3 55.9 Metal cans________________________ 56.3 53.4 50.9 54.8 51.8 51.8 52.6 Cutlery, hand tools, and general hard 128.7 127.1 129.9 129.4 128.1 127.7 125.7 126.8 123.8 122.6 119.7 117.6 122.8 122.6 113.1 ware_________________________ Heating equipment and plumbing 59.7 60.6 60.2 59.4 61.0 60.2 60.6 60.9 60.8 59.5 60.0 62.5 61.6 60.7 fixtures_______________________ 61.2 Fabricated structural metal products. . 297.7 288.7 284.0 279.1 279.2 279.9 284.2 286.0 282.8 283.3 283.9 281.1 275.9 271.9 252.7 73.4 69.6 73.4 76.4 74.7 73.6 72.8 78.6 77.3 76.7 75.5 80.5 78.8 78.2 74.8 Screw machine products, bolts, etc___ Metal stampings___________________ 192.9 193.1 193.6 194.2 193.3 192.4 193.8 192.3 190. 0 184.0 170.3 173.4 180.2 180.9 161.1 61.7 59.5 62.4 61.1 65.2 64.3 63.9 61.0 59.9 63.3 63.3 67.8 65.7 65.5 Coating, engraving, and allied services. 65.9 46.3 50.2 50.4 52.8 50.8 50.3 50.2 53.4 52.7 52.5 52.2 51.2 54.1 53.4 53.3 Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. Miscellaneous fabricated metal prod 97.0' ucts____ ___________________ _ 113.5 114.6 114.0 109.5 109.9 107.9 107.7 106.8 106.8 104.3 104.4 103.8 105.7 104.2 See footnotes a t end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 920 T a b l e A -3 . P ro d u c tio n or n o n su p e rv iso ry w ork ers in n o n a g r icu ltu r a l e sta b lish m e n ts, b y in d u str y 1— C o n tin u e d Revised series; see box, p. 922. [Inthousands] Annual average 1965 1966 Industry Ju n e2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Manufacturing—Continued Durable goods— Continued Machinery______ — ----------------- 1,312.1 1,295. 5 1,285.3 1,276.8 1,266.3 1, 250. 5 1, 242.1 1,226. 0 1,211.5 1,211.5 1,195.6 1,203. 6 1,205. 5 61.4 61.6 65.0 64.6 64.4 61.7 63.8 63.0 62.0 67.1 65.7 68.6 66.2 Engines and turbines_____ ____ 97.2 99.0 95.7 95.8 98.2 97.3 109.9 110.1 110.4 108.7 105.1 102.0 Farm machinery and equipm ent-.- - _ 171.3 173.9 172.9 170.4 173.8 177.4 172.8 173.6 174.6 185.9 183.4 181.1 178.9 Construction and related machinery— Metalworking machinery and equip245.6 244.2 243.3 241.1 240.3 235.9 234.3 229.4 226.8 227.5 223.3 224.6 226.9 -----m e n t ___ 140.0 137.4 136.0 137.2 136.4 137.0 135.6 134.6 133.4 133. 5 132.0 131.8 132.2 Special industry m achinery-.----General industrial machinery.- ------- 188.3 185.2 183.9 184.4 182.5 181.0 180.5 177.6 176.6 175.3 176.6 176.1 176.2 Office, computing, and accounting machines___ - - - - - - - - - -.- 132.0 131.1 128.9 127.8 126.2 125.9 126.2 124.9 122.6 120.9 117.8 114. 5 113.7 81.5 76.1 75.7 75.2 75.3 81.3 77.0 74.8 75.5 76.6 82.3 80.6 79.5 Service industry machines.. Miscellaneous machinery------------------ 159.4 156.6 156.3 154.7 152.8 151.0 150.5 148.1 145.4 145. 9 143.0 142.6 143.1 Electrical equipment and supplies--------- 1,330.1 1,303. 6 1, 289.6 1,265.3 1,261.2 1, 244.7 1,240.6 1,221.3 1,202.9 1,180.2 1,147. 8 1,131.9 1,135. 5 Electric distribution equipm ent-- . . 134.3 130.9 129.3 127.9 126.2 125.7 125. 0 123.7 121.9 120.9 119.4 117.5 116. 2 Electrical industrial apparatus_______ 153.4 148.4 149.2 147.6 145.6 144.1 142.6 139.4 138.2 136.7 136.2 136.7 135.8 144.9 146.0 144.5 131.7 141.7 137.3 137.6 134.1 132.6 131.0 124.6 129.0 130.5 Household appliances. ------ Electric lighting and wiring equip146.8 144.6 142.8 140.8 139.3 137.0 137.1 136.3 134.1 133.2 128.1 127.3 129. 5 m ent__ . 135.7 127.4 125.6 126.1 126.4 127.4 129.2 127.6 125.1 121.5 116.2 109.6 108.5 Radio and TV receiving sets. -------- . Communication equipm ent.- .. ------- 243.9 240.6 237.3 235.1 232.0 229.7 228.1 224.0 220.2 216.6 212.7 210.2 210.8 Electronic components and accessories.. 288.7 283.8 280.3 276.1 271.4 264.7 259.7 254.1 248.0 238.7 232.4 226.9 227.8 Miscellaneous electrical equipment 76.4 78.8 78.2 74.7 78.6 81.6 80.0 81.3 82.1 82.8 82.4 81.9 80.6 and supplies -------------- ------1,244.4 1,318.4 1,144. 0 1,217.9 1,323.8 1,313.8 1,290. 6 1,270. 2 Transportation equipm ent.. 1,358. 8 1,367. 7 .1,357.3 1,354. 6 1, 340. 5 700.3 694.7 698.8 696.1 687.5 706.0 706.4 696.6 681.6 567.7 659. 5 678.0 Motor'vehicles and equipm ent.. 430.6 429.7 424.7 417.2 408.4 400.2 391.4 381.2 369.0 364.4 355.6 350.1 3 4 0 .6 Aircraft and parts... 1. . . 61.6 98.6 171.2 1,117.8 58.4 92.0 159.5 225.3 132.1 173.9 211.4 124.2 163. 1 116.0 77.4 143.1 103.0 72.8 133.4 117.5 134.8 131.3 1,038.5 109.0 122.7 124. 7 130.0 110.9 214.1 230.0 77.5 121.9 92.7 202.8 193.8 70.9 1, 120.3 581.1 337.7 S h ip a n d b o a t b u ild in g a n d r e p a ir in g .— R a ilr o a d e q u ip m e n t . . . O th e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n e q u i p m e n t _______ 1 4 1 .2 1 4 3 .1 4 6 .5 4 8 .1 1 4 4 .3 4 6 .1 4 7 .5 1 4 9 .3 4 4 .9 4 4 .4 1 4 8 .3 4 4 .3 4 3 .4 1 4 5 .1 4 4 .3 4 1 .3 1 3 7 .4 4 4 .7 4 4 .3 1 3 5 .6 4 4 .5 4 6 .1 1 3 6 .6 4 1 .9 4 6 .5 1 3 3 .8 44. 1 4 6 .3 1 3 0 .9 4 2 .4 4 7 .4 1 1 8 .8 4 2 .8 4 6 .7 1 3 6 .0 43. 5 4 6 .3 667.3 352.9 133.1 43.1 44.6 I n s t r u m e n t s a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s _________ E n g in e e r in g a n d s c ie n t if i c i n s t r u m e n t s . M e c h a n ic a l m e a s u r i n g a n d c o n t r o l d e v ic e s. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . O p t ic a l a n d o p h t h a l m i c g o o d s ------------- --O p h t h a lm ic g o o d s . . . ___ S u r g ic a l, m e d i c a l , a n d d e n t a l e q u i p m e n t P h o to g r a p h ic e q u ip m e n t a n d s u p p lie s . W a t c h e s a n d c lo c k s _ 2 7 4 .3 2 7 0 .0 3 7 .4 2 6 6 .5 3 6 .9 2 6 6 .0 3 7 .5 2 6 3 .2 3 7 .4 2 5 9 .6 3 7 .0 2 5 8 .2 3 6 .8 2 5 6 .5 3 6 .6 2 5 4 .3 3 6 .9 2 5 4 .1 3 6 .6 2 4 9 .5 3 5 .7 2 4 7 .2 3 5 .8 2 4 5 .4 3 5 .7 246.4 35.6 233.8 35.9 7 0 .0 3 5 .1 6 9 .0 3 5 .8 2 6 .2 4 4 .6 5 3 .8 2 9 .4 6 8 .5 3 5 .8 2 6 .3 4 4 .1 5 3 .1 2 8 .1 6 7 .9 3 5 .5 2 6 .1 4 4 .0 5 2 .3 2 8 .8 6 7 .2 3 5 .2 2 5 .9 4 3 .3 5 1 .9 2 8 .2 6 6 .6 3 4 .4 2 5 .1 4 2 .4 5 1 .1 2 8 .1 6 6 .4 3 4 .5 2 5 .2 4 1 .9 5 0 .6 2 8 .0 6 5 .9 3 4 .3 2 5 .1 4 1 .4 5 0 .3 2 8 .0 6 4 .5 3 4 .0 2 4 .9 4 0 .8 5 0 .3 2 7 .8 6 6 .0 3 3 .7 2 4 .6 4 0 .6 4 9 .8 2 7 .4 6 5 .1 3 2 .7 23. 7 4 0 .2 4 9 .8 26. 0 6 5 .6 3 2 .6 2 3 .6 3 9 .6 4 8 .8 2 4 .8 65. 5 3 2 .7 2 3 .9 3 9 .8 4 7 .1 24. 6 65.1 33.1 24.1 39.9 47.4 25.4 63.1 31.0 22.4 37.5 42.8 23.4 M is c e lla n e o u s m a n u fa c tu r in g in d u s t r ie s .. J e w e lr y ,s ilv e r w a r e , a n d p la te d w a r e . .. T o y s , a m u s e m e n t, a n d s p o r tin g g o o d s . P e n s , p e n c i ls , o f fic e a n d a r t m a t e r i a l s . C o s t u m e j e w e lr y , b u t t o n s , a n d n o t io n s . O th e r m a n u f a c t u r i n g i n d u s t r i e s . . . . . M u s ic a l in s tr u m e n ts a n d p a r ts . . . 3 5 8 .4 3 7 .3 3 5 3 .1 3 7 .1 1 0 5 .9 2 5 .9 4 5 .7 1 3 8 .5 2 2 .2 3 4 5 .5 3 7 .0 9 8 .8 2 6 .0 4 5 .3 1 3 8 .4 2 2 .2 3 3 7 .8 3 6 .7 9 2 .8 2 5 .9 4 5 .1 1 3 7 .3 2 2 .3 3 3 0 .3 3 6 .3 8 8 .4 2 5 .3 4 4 .3 1 3 6 .0 2 2 .1 3 1 7 .6 3 5 .1 8 2 .8 23. 9 4 2 .1 133. 7 21. 9 3 5 2 .0 3 6 .4 1 0 7 .5 2 6 .3 4 5 .6 1 3 6 .2 2 2 .1 3 7 2 .7 3 6 .3 1 2 5 .0 2 6 .4 4 6 .7 1 3 8 .3 2 2 .1 3 7 5 .5 3 6 .4 1 2 7 .9 2 5 .8 4 6 .5 1 3 8 .9 2 1 .5 3 6 4 .9 3 5 .9 1 2 1 .1 2 5 .5 4 5 .3 1 3 7 .1 21. 1 3 5 4 .7 3 5 .2 1 1 4 .4 2 5 .2 4 5 .4 1 3 4 .5 2 0 .5 3 2 8 .6 3 2 .5 1 0 2 .4 2 4 .3 42. 1 1 2 7 .3 1 9 .9 3 3 6 .1 3 4 .8 1 0 0 .5 2 4 .3 4 3 .9 1 3 2 .6 2 0 .4 339. 5 35.0 102.4 24.7 44.3 133.0 318.7 34.1 88.3 23.6 45.1 127.6 18.2 45. Ï 1 4 0 .7 20.6 121.1 38.7 41. 7 Nondurable goods F o o d a n d k i n d r e d p r o d u c t s _____________ _ 1 ,1 2 1 .8 1, 0 8 0 .0 1 ,0 7 4 . 7 1 ,0 7 5 .3 1 ,0 7 3 . 6 1 ,0 8 8 . 3 1 ,1 3 5 .9 1 ,1 9 3 . 9 1 ,2 3 2 .5 1 ,2 6 5 .9 1 .2 5 5 . 7 1 ,1 7 5 .2 1 ,1 2 4 . 2 237. 4 2 4 9 .6 2 4 1 .8 2 4 5 .7 236. 3 2 4 9 .7 2 3 4 .4 2 4 8 .7 2 5 2 .9 2 5 3 .5 2 3 3 .8 M e a t p r o d u c t s . . _ ____________ _____ ._ 2 4 2 .1 2 3 7 .4 1 2 2 .7 1 3 8 .3 1 3 7 .0 1 3 1 .6 1 3 7 .1 1 2 3 .3 1 2 5 .1 1 2 7 .5 1 2 4 .4 1 2 5 .7 1 2 6 .2 D a i r y p r o d u c t s ___ _ _ _ ------------- . . 1 3 3 .4 1 2 7 .8 C a n n e d a n d p r e ser v e d food , e x c e p t 1 8 8 .0 1 9 9 .6 184.4 3 1 8 .8 247. C 2 0 0 .8 2 7 3 .8 3 2 9 .3 1 8 2 .9 2 3 8 .6 m ea ts 186. 5 18 9 .8 8 4 .1 9 0 .6 8 9 .9 8 9 .2 8 9 .9 8 4 .3 8 5 .1 8 9 .8 8 4 .5 8 5 .9 8 4 .0 8 2 .9 G r a in m i l l p r o d u c t s _____ - _— 8 8 .0 1 6 0 .1 166. 5 1 6 6 .5 1 6 7 .8 1 6 5 .4 1 6 5 .1 1 6 0 .4 1 5 9 .3 1 6 2 .1 16 5 .2 1 5 9 .5 B a k e r y p r o d u c t s ______ ___________ _ 15 9 .4 1 6 2 .8 3 4 .4 2 2 .9 24. 1 2 3 .4 2 2 .6 4 1 .7 2 6 .6 4 0 .6 4 4 .2 25. ( 23. f Sugar. _______ . . . . 2 3 .6 6 2 .7 5 7 .9 6 6 .3 6 2 .3 5 5 .3 6 2 .5 6 7 .7 6 8 .3 6 8 .8 6 2 .5 5 6 .8 5 7 .5 C o n f e c t io n e r y a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s -----5 8 .7 1 0 7 .1 1 1 6 .8 1 1 7 .2 1 1 6 .5 1 1 6 .8 1 1 7 .5 1 0 5 .9 1 1 1 .3 1 1 5 .5 1 1 0 .9 113.4 116. t B e v e r a g e s ... .................. 1 2 1 .8 M i s c e l l a n e o u s fo o d a n d k i n d r e d p r o d 91. 8 9 1 .1 9 3 .4 9 1 .3 9 1 .8 9 1 .0 9 4 .5 9 6 .4 9 5 .9 9 0 .3 8 8 .4 8 7 .8 u c t s _______ ____ . . . 8 9 .3 T o b a cco m a n u fa ctu res. _ . C ig a r e tte s . . _ C ig a r s . . . _ ___________ _____ T e x t ile m ill p r o d u c ts . C o tto n b r o a d w o v e n f a b r ic s .._ S i lk a n d s y n t h e t i c b r o a d w o v e n f a b r ic s . W e a v i n g a n d f in i s h in g b r o a d w o o l e n s . . N a r r o w fa b r ic s a n d s m a l l w a r e s . K n it t in g F in is h in g t e x t ile s , e x c e p t w o o l a n d k n i t . F lo o r c o v e r i n g .. _ Y a r n a n d th r ea d M i s c e l l a n e o u s t e x t i l e g o o d s _____________ 1 See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 1 .0 5 9 .8 3 0 .9 2 0 .1 6 1 .6 3 0 .8 2 0 .1 6 4 .0 3 0 .5 1 9 .9 8 5 7 .3 2 2 0 .8 8 5 .4 3 9 .! 27. 217. £ 64. 8 4 7 .6 2 1 8 .4 8 4 .3 3 8 .! 27. ' 2 1 4 .8 64. 3 3 .3 106 .6 5 9 .8 8 4 3 .9 2 1 7 .3 8 4 .3 3 8 .6 2 7 .: 2 1 2 .7 64. 3 3 .' 105. 6 0 .4 840. f 2 1 7 .2 8 4 .4 3 8 .7 27.1 2 0 8 .5 6 3 .6 3 3 .6 1 0 5 .S 61. C 108. 60. , 146.4 1,154.3 244.6 250.4 130.7 134.7 87.7 164.5 29.1 62.5 113.1 215.1 90.3 166. 5 30.6 62.2 111.7 2 21.8 92.3 92.8 6 7 .2 3 0 .5 2 0 .2 6 9 .7 3 0 .2 1 9 .9 76. 3 1 .; 2 1 .8 7 4 .8 31. ! 2 2 .1 8 6 .0 3 1 .5 22.1 8 5 .7 3 2 .2 2 1 .7 7 7 .6 32. t 2 1.4 6 2 .8 31.4 2 0 .7 6 3 .1 3 1 .5 2 1 .7 72.1 31.4 21.7 77.4 31. 1 23.7 8 3 3 .5 216. ' 8 3 .9 3 8 .4 26. f 2 0 4 .0 6 3 .4 3 4 .2 1 0 5 .6 6 0 .8 8 2 7 .6 2 1 6 .3 83. 37. 26. 199. 63. 34. 105. 6 0 .4 8 3 3 .9 216. 2 8 3 .8 3 7 .8 2 6 .6 20O.7 6 3 .6 3 4 .8 1 0 5 .2 6 0 .2 8 3 7 .8 2 1 4 .2 8 3 .6 3 7 .6 2 6 .: 2 1 4 .3 6 3 .1 3 4 .6 1 0 3 .9 6 0 .2 8 3 5 .3 2 1 2 .8 8 2 .8 3 7 .7 2 6 .' 2 1 6 .' 63. 3 4 .: 102 .7 59. 8 3 2 .0 211. 5 82. 3 8 .4 2 6 .' 2 1 5 .7 6 3 .2 3 3 .8 1 0 2 .2 5 8 .7 8 3 0 .1 2 1 1 .9 8 2 .0 3 8 .5 26. ( 215.4 6 3 .6 32. 7 102. ( 5 8 .0 8 1 6 .0 2 1 1 .4 8 0 .8 3 8 .2 24. 8 2 0 8 .: 6 3 .3 32. C 8 2 6 .3 2 1 1 .9 8 1 .5 3 8 .9 26. 1 2 1 0 .7 6 4 .8 3 2 .3 101. 3 5 8 .8 821.4 211.9 81.8 38.1 25.9 206.8 64.2 33.3 797.5 209.0 81.3 39.2 24.6 193.4 65.3 31.9 96.8 56.1 99.! 5 7 .3 101.1 58.2 A.—EMPLOYMENT T able A-3. 921 Production or nonsupervisory workers in non agricultural establishments, by industry 1—Continued [In th o u sa n d s] Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 A nnual average 1966 In d u stry June2 M ay2 A p r. M ar. F eb. Jan D ec. N ov. O ct. S ep t. A ug. J u ly June 1965 1964 Manufacturing—C o n t i n u e d N o n d u r a b le g o o d s — C o n t i n u e d A p p a r e l a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s ......................... . 1 ,2 6 3 .8 1 ,2 4 0 . 7 1 ,2 2 3 .0 1 ,2 4 4 .1 1 ,2 3 6 . 2 1 0 9 .4 M e n ’s a n d b o y s ’ s u i t s a n d c o a t s ________ 1 0 8 .6 1 0 8 .2 1 0 7 .5 1 0 8 .4 M e n ’s a n d b o y s ’ f u r n i s h i n g s ____________ 3 3 4 .0 3 3 8 .9 3 3 0 .6 3 2 6 .4 3 2 9 .4 W o m e n ’s , m i s s e s ’, a n d j u n i o r s ’ o u t e r 3 8 4 .6 w e a r ______________________________________ 3 7 8 .1 3 6 7 .7 3 8 4 .7 3 8 4 .0 W o m e n ’s a n d c h i l d r e n ’s u n d e r g a r 1 1 5 .2 m e n t s __________________________ ____ _____ 1 1 4 .0 1 1 1 .9 1 1 3 .8 1 1 3 .4 2 3 .0 H a t s , c a p s , a n d m i l l i n e r y ________________ 2 4 .0 2 8 .9 2 8 .6 7 6 .7 7 2 .6 G ir l s ’ a n d c h i l d r e n ’s o u t e r w e a r . ............ .. 7 0 .7 7 3 .5 7 3 .7 66.6 6 6 .9 6 3 .7 F u r g o o d s a n d m is c e l l a n e o u s a p p a r e l .. . 6 5 .6 M i s c e l l a n e o u s f a b r ic a t e d t e x t i l e p r o d 1 4 3 .0 1 4 3 .5 1 4 2 .1 1 4 1 .2 u c t s . .............................................................. ............. 1 3 8 .7 P a p e r a n d a l li e d p r o d u c t s . .................................. P a p e r a n d p u l p . ............................................. ......... P a p e r b o a r d - ............................................................... C o n v er te d p a p er a n d p a p erb o a rd p r o d u c t s . ............ ................ ........................................ .. P a p e r b o a r d c o n t a in e r s a n d b o x e s _______ P r i n t i n g , p u b l i s h i n g , a n d a l li e d i n d u s t r i e s _____________________________ _________ N e w s p a p e r p u b l i s h i n g a n d p r i n t i n g ____ P e r io d ic a l p u b l i s h i n g a n d p r i n t i n g _____ B o o k s .............. ................................................. .............. C o m m e r c i a l p r i n t i n g _____________________ B o o k b i n d i n g a n d r e la t e d i n d u s t r i e s ____ O th e r p u b lis h in g a n d p r in tin g in d u s t r i e s . . ........................................................................ C h e m i c a l s a n d a llie d p r o d u c t s ....................... I n d u s t r i a l c h e m i c a l s _____________________ P l a s t i c s m a t e r ia l s a n d s y n t h e t i c s . .......... D r u g s . . . .............................................................. .. S o a p , c le a n e r s , a n d t o i l e t g o o d s ________ P a i n t s , v a r n i s h e s , a n d a l li e d p r o d u c t s . A g r i c u l t u r a i c h e m i c a l s ..................................... O t h e r c h e m i c a l p r o d u c t s ________________ Petroleum refining and related indus tries_____ ___ ________________ Petroleum refining________________ Other petroleum and coal products...... Rubber and miscellaneous plastic prod ucts................................................... Tires and inner tubes............................ Other rubber products_____________ Miscellaneous plastic products______ Leather and leather products_________ Leather tanning and finishing_______ Footwear, except rubber______ ____ Other leather products......................... Handbags and personal leather goods. Transportation and public utilities : Local and interurban passenger transit: Local and suburban transportation___ Intercity and rural bus lines________ Motor freight transportation and storage. Public warehousing___ ____ _______ Pipeline transportation______________ Communication ____ _____________ Telephone communication_________ Telegraph communication 3___ _____ Radio and television broadcasting____ Electric, gas, and sanitary services_____ Electric companies and systems_____ Gas companies and systems_________ Combined utility systems__________ Water, steam, and sanitary systems__ Wholesale and retail trade <____________ Wholesale trade__ _________________ Motor vehicles and automotive equip ment_________________________ Drugs, chemicals, and allied products.. Dry goods and apparel___ _________ Groceries and related products______ Electrical goods__________________ Hardware, plumbing, and heating goods. Machinery, equipment, and supplies... Miscellaneous wholesalers_____ ____ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 ,2 1 9 . 5 1 ,2 2 8 . 4 1 ,2 2 9 .3 1, 229. 4 1 ,2 2 3 .6 1 ,1 6 4 . 9 1, 207. 8 1, 2 0 2 .9 1 ,1 5 7 .8 1 0 7 .2 1 0 5 .8 1 0 8 .7 1 0 8 .3 108. C 1 0 0 .3 1 0 8 .5 1 0 6 .4 1 0 2 .6 3 2 5 .5 3 2 5 .3 3 2 3 .6 3 2 5 .2 3 2 5 .6 3 1 5 .1 3 1 8 .2 3 2 2 .8 2 9 7 .3 3 5 3 .8 3 7 3 .2 3 7 1 .8 3 7 2 .2 3 7 5 .7 3 7 7 .2 3 5 7 .5 3 7 0 .3 3 6 9 .6 3 6 1 .5 1 1 1 .9 2 6 .5 6 7 .8 6 4 .8 1 1 4 .5 2 5 .6 7 0 .0 6 8 .7 1 1 4 .1 26. 4 7 1 .3 6 9 .1 1 1 3 .3 2 7 .4 7 0 .6 6 8 .9 1 1 1 .9 2 8 .1 7 1 .7 6 7 .3 1 0 4 .0 2 6 .9 7 0 .5 6 2 .8 1 0 9 .4 2 4 .8 7 3 .7 6 5 .2 1 0 9 .8 2 6 .9 7 0 .7 6 5 .0 1 0 7 .5 2 6 .7 6 9 .5 6 2 .7 1 4 3 .0 1 4 5 .3 1 4 4 .9 1 4 0 .0 1 3 3 .8 1 2 7 .8 1 3 3 .1 1 3 6 .4 1 2 9 .9 5 2 5 .3 1 7 3 .5 5 5 .2 5 1 2 .4 1 6 8 .1 5 4 .1 5 1 0 .9 1 6 7 .6 5 3 .8 5 0 6 .9 1 6 6 .7 5 3 .5 5 0 4 .3 1 6 6 .2 5 3 .5 5 0 8 .6 1 6 7 .4 5 3 .9 5 0 7 .1 166. 4 54. 0 5 0 4 .7 1 6 6 .7 5 3 .8 5 0 6 .1 1 6 8 .8 5 4 .7 5 0 2 .9 1 7 1 .5 5 2 .5 4 9 8 .6 1 7 1 .2 5 4 .2 4 9 9 .0 1 6 9 .9 5 4 .6 497 2 167. 5 5 3 .6 4 8 8 .7 1 6 9 .8 5 3 .0 1 2 4 .2 1 7 2 .4 121.6 121.8 1 6 8 .6 1 6 7 .7 1 2 0 .3 1 6 6 .4 1 1 8 .8 1 6 5 .8 1 1 9 .1 1 6 8 .2 1 1 8 .7 168. 0 1 1 7 .5 1 6 6 .7 1 1 7 .7 1 6 4 .9 1 1 7 .7 1 6 1 .2 1 1 4 .7 1 5 8 .5 1 1 4 .4 1 6 0 .1 1 1 5 .2 1 6 1 .0 1 1 1 .9 1 5 4 .0 6 5 1 .4 1 7 8 .4 6 4 3 .6 1 7 8 .3 2 5 .1 5 3 .5 2 5 3 .0 4 4 .3 6 4 2 .0 1 7 9 .0 2 5 .1 5 2 .9 2 5 1 .7 4 4 .4 6 3 7 .6 1 7 5 .7 2 5 .5 5 3 .0 2 5 1 .6 4 4 .0 6 3 5 .3 1 7 7 .7 2 5 .6 5 2 .0 2 4 8 .0 4 2 .9 6 3 5 .3 1 7 9 .8 2 5 .4 4 9 .9 2 4 8 .8 4 2 .8 6 3 4 .0 1 7 9 .3 25. 6 49. 2 2 4 8 .1 42. 7 6 3 0 .4 1 7 9 .9 2 5 .3 4 8 .9 2 4 5 .7 4 2 .2 6 2 5 .7 1 7 7 .6 2 5 .4 4 9 .0 2 4 4 .1 4 2 .1 6 2 1 .7 1 7 6 .3 2 5 .0 4 9 .1 2 4 0 .3 4 3 .7 6 1 7 .9 1 7 6 .4 2 4 .1 4 8 .7 2 3 8 .9 4 3 .2 6 1 6 .4 1 7 5 .5 2 4 .1 4 8 .6 2 3 9 .9 4 2 .4 filQ 6 175 8 24 9 49 1 241 8 4 1 .9 6 0 1 .4 1 6 9 .9 2 5 .9 4 7 .1 2 3 5 .8 3 9 .6 2 5 5 .1 4 6 .1 1 3 4 .4 2 5 .2 9 1 .8 8 9 .4 8 8 .9 8 7 .8 8 9 .1 8 7 .9 8 8 .6 9 8 .1 8 8 .4 8 7 .5 8 7 .3 8 6 .6 8 5 .9 8 6 .2 8 3 .2 5 6 7 .9 1 6 8 .2 1 4 2 .6 6 5 .3 3 8 .0 3 1 .7 5 6 .1 5 6 5 .9 1 6 6 .4 1 4 1 .1 6 3 .5 6 4 .5 3 6 .8 3 8 .8 5 4 .8 5 6 3 .5 1 6 6 .6 1 4 0 .5 6 3 .1 6 0 .8 3 6 .3 4 2 .6 5 3 .6 5 5 6 .5 1 6 6 .2 1 3 9 .4 6 3 .0 6 0 .4 3 6 .1 3 8 .5 5 2 .9 5 4 8 .9 1 6 5 .3 1 3 8 .6 6 2 .6 6 2 .1 3 5 .8 3 3 .7 5 0 .8 5 4 4 .3 1 6 4 .4 1 3 8 .4 6 2 .2 6 1 .7 3 5 .4 3 1 .9 5 0 .3 5 4 3 .4 1 6 5 .2 1 3 7 .7 6 2 .2 6 1 .9 3 5 .8 3 0 .8 4 9 .8 5 4 2 .9 164. 2 137. 7 6 1 .8 63. 4 3 6 .2 3 0 .1 49. 5 5 4 2 .6 1 6 3 .6 1 3 6 .1 61. 4 6 5 .1 3 6 .2 3 0 .7 49. 5 5 4 6 .8 1 6 4 .8 1 3 8 .1 6 1 .4 6 5 .2 3 6 .9 3 0 .6 4 9 .8 5 5 0 .8 1 6 7 .5 1 3 7 .6 6 1 .9 6 5 .5 3 8 .1 3 0 .3 4 9 .9 5 4 8 .3 1 6 7 .1 1 3 6 .2 6 2 .1 6 4 .6 3 8 .0 3 0 .0 5 0 .3 5 4 4 .4 1 6 5 .6 1 3 5 .7 5 7 .8 6 4 .5 3 7 .8 3 3 .0 5 0 .0 5 4 2 .4 1 6 5 .0 1 3 4 .5 6 0 .1 6 3 .6 3 6 .6 3 3 .5 4 9 .2 5 2 8 .6 1 6 5 .1 1 2 3 .1 5 9 .4 6 2 .1 3 6 .2 3 3 .7 4 9 .0 1 1 4 .5 8 6 .5 2 8 .0 1 1 0 .9 8 4 .8 2 6 .1 1 0 8 .8 8 4 .2 2 4 .6 1 0 7 .2 8 4 .1 2 3 .1 1 0 6 .7 8 4 .1 1 0 6 .7 8 4 .0 2 2 .7 1 0 8 .0 84. 6 2 3 .4 1 0 9 .3 111.0 22.6 8 4 .9 2 6 .1 1 1 2 .8 8 5 .9 2 6 .9 1 1 3 .6 8 6 .6 2 7 .0 1 1 3 .6 8 7 .1 2 6 .5 1 1 1 .8 8 6 .8 2 5 .0 1 1 0 .0 8 5 .7 2 4 .3 1 1 3 .6 8 9 .6 2 4 .0 3 9 3 .8 7 8 .7 1 4 3 .8 1 7 1 .3 3 8 6 .4 7 6 .3 1 4 2 .1 1 6 8 .0 3 8 3 .3 7 4 .4 1 4 0 .8 1 6 8 .1 3 8 0 .3 7 4 .3 141. 1 1 6 4 .9 3 7 7 .3 7 4 .1 1 4 0 .8 1 6 2 .4 3 7 8 .0 7 5 .2 1 4 1 .7 1 6 1 .1 3 7 9 .8 75. 7 141. 8 1 6 2 .3 3 7 7 .5 75. 5 140. 7 161. 3 3 7 1 .9 7 4 .7 1 3 8 .5 1 5 8 .7 3 6 8 .7 7 4 .4 1 3 6 .9 1 5 7 .4 3 6 3 .0 7 3 .7 1 3 4 .2 1 5 5 .1 3 5 4 .0 7 1 .3 1 3 2 .9 1 4 9 .8 3 5 8 .2 7 1 .1 1 3 5 .7 1 5 1 .4 3 6 0 .9 7 2 .9 1 3 5 .8 1 5 2 .1 3 3 4 .7 7 0 .9 1 2 8 .3 1 3 5 .4 3 2 0 .3 2 7 .9 2 1 3 .2 7 9 .2 3 1 5 .9 2 7 .6 2 1 0 .4 7 7 .9 3 2 .5 3 1 4 .2 2 7 .6 2 0 8 .8 7 7 .8 3 2 .9 3 1 8 .5 2 7 .9 212. 5 7 8 .1 3 4 .2 3 1 9 .6 2 8 .1 2 1 4 .0 7 7 .5 3 3 .6 3 1 3 .8 2 8 .3 211.1 7 4 .4 3 1 .6 3 1 5 .9 ¿8. 5 210. 6 7 6 .8 32. 5 3 1 5 .5 2 8 .1 2 0 8 .1 7 9 .3 34. 4 3 1 0 .7 2 7 .9 2 0 4 .6 7 8 .2 3 4 .1 3 1 2 .4 2 8 .0 2 0 6 .1 7 8 .3 3 3 .8 3 1 7 .9 2 7 .6 2 1 1 .6 7 8 .7 3 3 .5 3 0 8 .3 2 7 .2 2 0 7 .4 7 3 .7 3 0 .5 3 1 0 .4 2 7 .4 2 0 7 .8 7 5 .2 3 1 .3 3 1 0 .8 2 7 .6 2 0 7 .7 7 5 .5 3 2 .5 3 0 6 .3 2 7 .5 2 0 4 .8 7 4 .0 3 2 .8 7 7 .0 3 8 .6 9 0 3 .0 6 7 .0 1 5 .5 7 2 2 .9 6 0 8 .6 2 2 .5 8 9 .6 5 4 0 .1 2 1 5 .5 1 3 3 .7 1 5 7 .4 3 3 .5 7 7 .6 3 7 .8 8 8 6 .9 7 8 .2 3 7 .2 8 8 3 .0 7 8 .2 3 7 .1 8 7 4 .8 6 7 .8 1 5 .6 7 0 7 .3 5 9 5 .0 2 1 .9 8 8 .3 5 3 5 .8 2 1 2 .9 1 3 4 .1 1 5 6 .2 3 2 .6 7 8 .3 3 7 .9 8 6 6 .3 6 9 .0 1 5 .7 7 0 4 .1 5 9 2 .4 2 1 .7 8 7 .9 5 3 6 .9 2 1 2 .9 1 3 4 .6 1 5 6 .4 3 3 .0 7 8 .6 3 8 .2 9 0 5 .6 7 4 .6 1 5 .8 7 0 7 .4 5 9 4 .2 2 1 .9 8 9 .2 5 3 9 .0 2 1 3 .4 1 3 5 .5 1 5 7 .0 3 3 .1 7 8 .8 3 7 .8 9 1 3 .0 7 9 .2 1 5 .8 7 0 5 .4 5 9 2 .8 2 1 .6 8 8 .9 5 3 6 .3 2 1 0 .4 1 3 5 .7 1 5 7 .1 3 3 .1 7 8 .9 3 8 .7 9 1 7 .0 7 7 .9 1 5 .9 7 0 4 .9 5 9 1 .7 2 1 .6 8 9 .6 540. 5 2 1 3 .5 1 3 6 .1 1 5 7 .9 3 3 .0 7 9 .2 4 0 .0 9 1 4 .2 7 1 .7 1 6 .3 7 0 7 .5 5 9 4 .0 2 1 .7 8 9 .8 5 4 9 .1 2 1 7 .0 1 3 8 .3 1 6 0 .3 3 3 .5 7 8 .3 4 0 .4 8 9 9 .2 6 6 .5 1 6 .8 7 1 8 .1 6 0 5 .8 2 1 .6 8 8 .7 558. 5 2 1 9 .9 1 4 2 .0 1 6 2 .6 3 4 .0 7 8 .5 4 0 .3 9 0 0 .9 6 7 .8 1 6 .8 7 1 6 .7 6 0 5 .2 2 1 .8 8 7 .7 5 5 2 .7 2 1 9 .9 1 3 7 .4 1 6 1 .3 3 4 .1 7 8 .9 3 9 .2 8 9 2 .8 6 8 .1 1 6 .8 7 0 2 .1 5 9 1 .3 2 1 .8 8 7 .0 5 4 6 .7 2 1 7 .1 1 3 7 .5 1 5 8 .4 3 3 .7 7 8 .9 3 8 .4 8 7 9 .3 7 0 .6 1 6 .3 6 9 9 .6 5 8 8 .2 2 1 .8 8 7 .6 5 3 9 .9 2 1 3 .6 1 3 5 .8 1 5 7 .5 3 3 .0 7 9 .7 3 8 .7 8 3 7 .3 7 2 .4 1 6 .9 6 7 4 .5 5 6 5 .9 2 2 .7 8 4 .1 5 3 4 .2 2 1 1 .4 1 3 4 .5 1 5 5 .5 3 2 .8 66.0 66.1 68.1 1 5 .5 7 1 8 .0 6 0 4 .2 1 5 .5 7 1 2 .4 5 9 9 .7 22.1 8 9 .6 5 3 9 .7 2 1 5 .1 1 3 4 .1 1 5 7 .2 3 3 .3 22.0 88.6 5 3 7 .4 2 1 3 .8 1 3 4 .0 1 5 6 .6 3 3 .0 1 1 ,6 6 9 1 1 ,5 1 4 1 1 ,4 7 6 1 1 ,3 0 6 1 1 ,2 3 1 1 1 ,3 2 5 1 2 ,2 5 1 1 1 ,5 8 0 1 1 ,3 6 4 1 1 ,2 7 8 1 1 ,2 2 0 1 1 ,2 2 7 1 1 ,2 4 6 11, 240 1 0 ,8 4 5 2 ,8 6 4 2 ,7 9 3 2 ,7 9 7 2 ,8 4 1 2 ,8 0 9 2 ,8 0 2 2 ,8 0 8 2 ,7 9 5 2 ,8 2 5 2 ,8 1 8 2 ,8 0 7 2 , 7Ó5 2 ,7 7 8 2 ,8 2 1 2 ,7 7 1 2 1 4 .6 1 6 5 .8 1 1 6 .7 4 2 5 .0 2 2 3 .2 1 3 1 .2 5 0 1 .9 9 6 6 .3 2 1 3 .7 1 6 5 .2 1 1 5 .6 4 2 2 .2 2 2 3 .3 1 3 1 .1 5 0 0 .6 9 6 5 .0 2 1 3 .3 1 6 5 .4 1 1 6 .5 4 2 2 .9 212.6 221.8 220.8 1 3 0 .5 4 9 5 .9 9 6 1 .3 1 3 0 .6 4 9 1 .7 9 5 9 .8 1 6 4 .9 1 1 5 .5 4 2 3 .2 2 1 3 .5 1 6 4 .8 1 1 3 .0 4 3 2 .0 2 1 8 .6 1 3 0 .2 4 8 8 .2 9 5 6 .4 2 1 4 .2 1 6 8 .1 1 1 4 .9 4 4 3 .8 2 1 9 .5 1 3 1 .0 4 8 7 .4 9 7 1 .0 2 1 3 .5 1 6 5 .8 1 1 5 .0 4 4 5 .4 2 1 6 .5 1 3 0 .8 4 8 5 .9 9 6 7 .0 2 1 2 .5 1 6 4 .6 1 1 4 .1 4 4 7 .6 2 1 4 .9 1 2 9 .9 4 8 5 .0 9 6 4 .2 2 1 2 .2 1 6 3 .8 1 1 3 .3 4 4 3 .5 2 1 7 .1 1 2 9 .6 4 8 6 .2 9 6 0 .6 2 1 4 .2 1 6 3 .5 1 1 4 .3 4 3 6 .4 2 2 0 .8 1 3 0 .2 4 8 7 .5 9 6 6 .5 2 1 3 .1 1 6 2 .8 1 1 3 .3 4 4 9 .0 2 1 9 .3 1 2 9 .7 4 8 7 .4 9 5 9 .5 2 1 1 .4 1 6 1 .8 1 1 2 .1 4 4 8 .9 2 1 6 .2 1 2 8 .3 4 8 1 .8 9 4 9 .3 2 1 0 .9 1 6 2 .6 1 1 2 .2 4 3 5 .7 2 1 4 .1 1 2 7 .8 4 7 9 .0 9 4 9 .8 2 0 5 .5 1 5 8 .6 1 0 9 .7 4 3 5 .0 2 0 3 .5 1 2 5 .1 4 6 2 .4 9 1 8 .3 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 922 T a b l e A -3 . Production or nonsupervisory workers in nonagricultural establishments, by industry 1—Continued Revised series; see box below. [in thousands] Annual average 1965 1966 Industry June 2 M a y 2 Apr. Wholesale and retail trade—Continued Retail tra d e 4---- ___— 8,805 General merchandise stores____ ___ __ __ ___ Department stores__ Mail order houses. Limited price variety stores . Food stores__ __ Grocery, meat, and vegetable stores__ Apparel and accessories stores__ M en’s and boys’ apparel stores______ Women’s ready-to-wear stores___ Family clothing stores__ __ _ Shoe stores Furniture and appliance stores__ Furniture and borne furnishines____ Fating and drinking places__ Other retail trade Building materials and hardware___ Motor vehicle dealers Other vehicle and accessory dealers___ Drug stores ... _ Fuel and ice dealers __ Finance, insurance, real estate 5__ .. Ranking Ored it agencies other than banks __ Ravings and loan associations___ Reourity dealers and exchanges _ Insurance carriers ___ Fife insurance Accident and health insurance Fire, marine, and casualty insurance-.- 2,504 Mar. Jan. Feb. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 8,706 8,674 8,511 8, 438 8,528 9,410 8, 755 8,543 8,469 8,402 8,420 8,468 8,468 8,140 1,721.1 1,721.6 1,683. 0 1,663.0 1,751.1 2,321.6 1,901. 0 1,749.8 1,683. 0 1,634.4 1,626. 0 1,641. 3 1,715.6 1,611.6 1,084.3 1, 077.6 1, 055. 3 1,042.1 1,102. 4 1,478. 9 1,189. 2 1,089.3 1,042.2 1,016.0 1,013.3 1,021.9 1,070. 0 996.5 105.0 106.9 108. 7 110.9 122.7 155.5 140.9 122.5 111.0 105.0 102.1 101.4 112.2 101.3 290.6 297.3 287. 8 279.6 291.8 391.7 320.5 293.7 286.8 275.7 273.5 279.7 293.9 285.4 1,431.3 1,423.8 1,424. 4 1,417.5 1,409.1 1,431.0 1,400. 5 1,385.7 1,362.3 1,343.8 1,359.3 1,362. 9 1,368.5 1,321.4 1,271.9 1,263.5 1,266. 4 1,257.2 1, 253.0 1,262.7 1, 239.9 1,227.9 1, 205. 4 1,189.1 1,201.4 1,201.9 1, 208. 7 1,162.1 569.9 587.7 551. 5 543.7 565.1 697.7 584.9 566.9 559.3 537.6 534.3 559.1 568.7 555.2 90.5 91.2 93.7 95.9 94. 7 93.1 91.0 99.6 97.4 95. 7 98.7 103.3 129.1 97.8 208.4 208.3 201. 4 197.2 204.7 248.9 214.2 209.8 205.3 200.1 196.0 203.8 208.5 207.6 95.2 96.1 97.0 89.4 90.3 98.3 91.9 90.5 93.8 95.1 124.5 90.4 92.6 92.9 107.9 124.2 102. 0 97.7 101.6 122.3 106.2 104.1 107.3 100.0 100.0 103.6 105.4 101.8 368.0 367. 0 367.6 366.9 368.2 387.1 373.3 367.7 363.5 360.9 359.5 358.8 362.6 349.8 237.4 236.6 236.5 236.1 237.3 251.3 241.6 237.4 235.4 233.8 232.8 233.6 234.9 226.0 1.856.8 1,820.9 1, 772. 8 1,744.6 1,728.3 1,765.8 1, 768.1 1,777.5 1,809. 7 1,824. 4 1,830. 2 1,835.8 1,769. 0 1,711.3 2.758.9 2,753.2 2, 712. 0 2,702.1 2,706.1 2,806. 7 2, 727. 2 2, 695. 8 2,691. 5 2,701.0 2,711.0 2,709. 6 2, 684. 0 2,590.6 476.3 473.2 461.0 452.1 457.5 472.3 473.2 471.7 474.9 486.5 486.8 478.7 466.4 460.2 635.8 637.9 638.9 637.5 637.4 637.0 634.6 631.8 628.4 630.7 632.7 628.5 625.2 596.3 161.3 158. 3 152. 8 151.0 154.3 164.9 160.4 154.7 151.2 155.5 156.5 157.1 153.6 144.1 381.2 380.5 377.3 376.5 379.4 400.2 379.8 373.2 369.6 365.6 369.0 368.4 370.7 356.1 95.4 95.5 88.6 89.9 97.4 94.4 89.0 90.1 94.6 99. 4 103.7 103.4 101.8 90.7 2,471 664.9 266.9 74.4 123.0 645.3 274.4 51.7 281.5 2,458 664.5 267.5 75.9 121.4 645.0 275.4 50.8 281.1 2,448 662. 3 268. 5 76. 0 120.4 645. 5 275.4 50.2 282.2 2,429 659.5 267.6 76.2 117.7 643.0 275.2 49.4 280.5 2,425 658.6 269.2 77.3 115.0 642.0 275.1 48.9 279.9 2,446 662.1 269.8 77.2 115.6 645.8 277.0 48.8 281.1 2,445 660.0 268.3 76.8 114.6 645.3 276.7 48.5 281.3 2,451 658.9 268.6 77.4 113.8 645.5 277.3 48.5 280.8 2,457 660.9 267.6 77.2 113.3 649.0 278.7 48.8 281.9 2,490 669.6 269.7 78.5 115.1 656.7 282.4 49.2 284.9 2,488 668.0 270.5 79.7 115.9 652.2 279.4 49.0 283.8 2,456 657. 7 266.8 77.8 113.8 643.3 276.5 48.4 279.2 2,437 656. 0 266.1 77.6 113.6 644.2 277.6 48.2 279.6 2,390 644.2 255. 0 77.6 111.6 641.5 282.0 47.5 274.1 Services and miscellaneous: Hotels and lodging places: Hotels tourist courts, and motels Personal services: Laundries, cleaning and dyeing plants *. Motion pictures: Motion picture filming and distribution.-_*._________________________ 615.0 590.6 568.5 564.2 550.5 556. 2 558.7 574.4 602.7 637.7 632.5 604.0 573.8 539.1 493.8 488.2 483.0 478.7 480.7 484.2 486.8 488.7 486.7 488.1 494.4 494.8 484.4 472.7 28.2 28.0 29.0 29.2 31.7 34.6 31.8 31.7 31.4 32.1 32.0 29.1 29.8 27.0 1 For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January 1966, and coverage of these series, see footnote 1, table A-2. For mining and manufacturing data, refer to production and related workers; for contract construction, to construction workers; and for all other industries, to nonsupervisory workers. Production and related workers include working foremen and all nonsuper visory workers (including leadmen and trainees) engaged in fabricating, processing, assembling, inspection, receiving, storage, handling, packing, warehousing, shipping, maintenance, repair, janitorial, and watchmen services, product development, auxiliary production for plant’s own use (e.g., powerplant), and recordkeeping and other services closely associated with the above production operations. Construction workers include working foremen, journeymen, mechanics, apprentices, laborers, etc., engaged in new work, alterations, demolition, repair, and maintenance, etc., at the site of construction or working in shop or yards at jobs (such as precutting and preassembling) ordinarily performed by members of the construction trades. Nonsupervisory workers include employees (not above the working super visory level) such as office and clerical workers, repairmen, salespersons, operators, drivers, attendants, service employees, linemen, laborers, janitors , watchmen, and similar occupational levels, and other employees whose services are closely associated with those of the employees listed. 2 Preliminary. 5 Data relate to nonsupervisory employees except messengers. 4 Beginning January 1964, data include eating and drinking places. 5 Beginning January 1964, nonoffice salesmen excluded from nonsuper visory count for all series in this division. * Beginning January 1964, data relate to nonsupervisory workers and are not comparable with the production worker levels of prior years. Caution The revised series on employment, hours, and earnings, and labor turnover in non agricultural establishments should not be compared with those published in issues prior to January 1966. (See footnote 1, table A-2, and “BLS Establishment Employment Estimates Revised to March 1964 Benchmark Levels” appearing in the December 1965 issue of E m p lo ym en t an d E arnings. Moreover, when the figures are again adjusted to new benchmarks, the data presented in this issue should not be compared with those in later issues which reflect the adjustments. Comparable data for earlier periods are published in E m p lo y m e n t an d E arnings S ta tis tic s for th e U n ited S ta te s , 1909-65 (BLS Bulletin 1312-3), which is available at depository libraries or which may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents for $4.25 a copy. For an individual industry, earlier data may be obtained upon request to the Bureau. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis m A.—EMPLOYMENT T able A-4. Employees in nonagricultural establishments, by industry division and selected groups, seasonally adjusted 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [in thousands] 1966 1965 Industry division and group Ju n e 2 M a y 2 Apr. . ______ . Contract construction_____ Manufacturing___ .... Nondurable goods... . Food and kindred products . Tobacco manufactures Textile mill products . . Apparel and related products. Paper and allied products. .. Printing, publishing, and allied industries . Chemicals and allied products Petroleum refining and related industries .Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products Leather and leather products Transportation and public utilities Dec. Nov. Oct. 627 622 617 3,267 3,202 3,186 Finance, insurance, and real estate___ . . . ___ 624 591 632 631 632 630 3,275 3,370 3,462 3,374 3,383 3,386 9,303 Government_____ Federal. _____ ______ _________ . State and lo cal... _____ ____ ____ _______ 1 For coverage of the series, see footnote Preliminary. 630 3,332 Sept. 62T 3,189 633 626 3,154 3,195 4,128 4,123 4,112 4,107 4,104 4,090 4,079 4,079 4,071 4,067 4,049 4,031 4,034 13,060 13, 016 13,004 13, 015 12,942 12, 909 12,822 12,754 12,684 12, 641 12, 600 12,619 12, 580 3,384 3,361 3,358 3,349 3,336 3,323 3,309 3,300 3,288 3,281 3; 273 3; 281 3', 272 9,676 9, 655 9, 646 9,666 9,606 9,586 9,513 9,454 9,396 9,360 9,327 9,338 9; 308 3,115 3,105 3,101 3,100 3,082 3,080 3,082 3,074 3,069 3,061 3, 053 3,049 3,041 Wholesale and retail trade Wholesale trade. Retail trade. T a b l e A —5. Jan. 19, 047 18,939 18,860 18, 780 18,691 18, 522 18,429 18,321 18,163 18,098 18,072 18,032 17,943 11,180 11,109 11,056 10, 996 10,919 10,805 10,707 10,615 10,523 10, 494 10,476 10,424 10,345 271 267 255 261 257 243 250 243 244 242 239 234 7236 616 630 619 628 636 633 623 613 605 601 603 602 601 456 456 448 451 442 451 447 432 435 430 427 430 428 635 634 640 640 643 644 636 624 627 622 618 612 618 1,328 1,310 1,303 1,294 1,288 1, 283 1,274 1,269 1,284 1,308 1,318 1,317 1,306 1,339 1,331 1,335 1,334 1,327 1,314 1,300 1,294 1,274 1,269 L 263 1,269 1, 259 1,847 1,826 1, 809 1,800 1,798 1,783 1,771 1,768 1,745 1,736 1,728 L 728 l ' 707 1,927 1,898 1,880 1,843 1,826 1,794 1,769 1,741 1,722 Í, 697 L 683 1, 677 1 665 1,893 1, 900 1,890 1,884 1,860 1,822 1,805 1,790 1,767 L 771 1, 781 1 740 1 735 425 422 410 416 414 405 398 392 394 ’ 383 389 390 388 443 446 437 443 440 446 430 440 435 428 428 418 415 7,867 7,830 7,804 7,784 7,772 7, 717 7,722 7,706 7,640 7, 604 7, 596 7, 608 7,598 1,718 1,727 1,738 1,748 1,749 1,743 1,745 1,761 1,733 i; 717 1, 723 1, 733 1,728 85 83 84 82 84 84 83 81 81 79 80 87 86 951 950 947 943 946 939 937 928 933 924 921 921 916 1,431 1,412 1,392 1,384 1,383 1,355 1,377 1,369 1,362 1,356 1,345 1,343 1,367 667 661 659 658 654 659 650 643 646 640 ' 641 ' 637 634 1,023 1,015 1, 013 1,003 1,004 992 998 984 990 980 981 981 975 944 937 927 931 931 922 918 914 909 910 911 908 900 179 178 176 176 177 175 178 177 178 179 179 179 177 506 499 496 487 491 485 483 477 469 465 466 464 463 363 368 363 368 363 361 358 354 357 354 353 351 352 Durable goods. _____ ____ Ordnance and accessories.. . Lumber and wood products, except furniture Furniture and fixtures.. Stone, clay, and glass products Primary metal industries__ _ Fabricated metal products Machinery.. Electrical equipment and supplies Transportation equipm ent. Instruments and related products Miscellaneous manufacturing industries Service and miscellaneous... Feb. Aug. July June 63,384 63,060 62, 935 62, 918 62,501 62,148 61,884 61,472 61,001 60,756 60,621 60, 501 60,290 Total___________________ Mining_____ Mar. 1, table A 9,283 9,261 9,251 9,205 9,142 9,128 9,081 9,019 8,967 8,946 8,929 8,857 10, 769 10,695 10, 636 10, 571 10,472 10,390 10,328 10,269 10,171 10,119 10,085 10, 054 10, 014 2,546 2, 521 2,501 2,477 2,451 2,425 2,395 2,400 2,386 2,379 2,379 2,376 2,355 8,223 8,174 8,135 8,094 8,021 7,965 7,933 7,869 7,785 7,740 7, 706 7; 678 7; 659 N o t e : The seasonal adjustment method used is described in “New Seasonai Adjustment Factors for Labor Force Components,” Monthly Labor Review, August 1960, pp. 822-827. 2. P ro d u ctio n w ork ers in m a n u fa c tu rin g in d u strie s, b y m a jo r in d u str y g rou p , se a so n a lly a d ju ste d 1 [in thousands] Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Major industry group Ju n e2 M a y 2 Apr. Manufacturing___ _________ ____ ___ Mar. Feb. Jan. 14,187 14, 105 14,054 14,003 13,937 13,801 Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 13,731 13, 647 13,507 13, 457 13,440 13, 405 13,340 Durable goods. ________ _______________ Ordnance and accessories ____________________ . Lumber and wood products, except furniture . _ Furniture and fixtures. __________________ _____ Stone, clay, and glass products____ Primary metal industries ____ _ Fabricated metal products. . ___ . _ _ Machinery . . _____ ... . . Electrical equipment and supplies . _ Transportation eq u ip m en t... .... Instruments and related products_____ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries.. . . . 8,294 129 539 379 509 1,083 1,042 1,298 1,338 1,351 273 353 8, 247 127 542 379 509 1, 066 1, 038 1, 283 1, 320 1, 354 272 357 8,214 123 550 374 516 1,062 1,041 1,270 1,306 1,348 269 355 8,177 121 558 375 518 1,055 1,040 1,264 1,278 1,348 267 353 8,122 118 553 373 516 1,050 1,036 1,262 1,260 1,330 265 350 8,027 113 556 370 520 1,045 1,024 1,252 1,244 1,297 261 345 7,955 107 547 368 512 1,035 1,012 1,244 1,225 1,290 256 359 7,878 108 538 362 503 1,031 1,006 1,242 L 199 1,282 254 353 7,798 107 530 358 500 1,046 987 1,224 1,182 1,263 ' 252 349 7,781 105 527 357 500 1,068 ' 983 1,218 li 163 1,267 '251 342 7,769 104 530 354 495 1,079 '977 1,208 L 152 1,280 ' 248 342 7,721 ' 102 528 357 495 1,077 '983 1,208 li 149 1,238 ' 250 334 7,662 ' 100 527 356 490 1,068 973 1,192 l' 142 1,237 ' 245 332 Nondurable go o d s__ __ ___________ _ Food and kindred products . . . . Tobacco manufactures __ ........ Textile mill products . _ ____ . . . . . Apparel and related products. ___________ Paper and allied products____________ . Printing, publishing, and allied industries.... . Chemicals and allied products . . ___ Petroleum refining and related industries. . Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products____ Leather and leather products___________ 5,893 1,132 72 849 1,278 520 651 565 113 395 318 5, 858 1, 140 71 848 1, 256 515 646 560 111 388 323 5, 840 1,150 72 846 1,238 515 643 556 110 387 323 5,826 1,161 72 844 1,229 513 640 556 109 383 319 5,815 1,161 70 842 1,229 512 639 554 110 379 319 5,774 1,155 71 840 1,203 510 637 551 110 380 317 5,776 1,156 72 837 1,225 507 629 548 110 378 314 5,769 1,174 69 834 1,216 503 630 547 110 372 314 5,709 li 144 70 828 1,212 500 625 544 110 365 311 5, 676 1,129 68 825 1,205 499 621 546 111 362 310 5, 671 1,135 68 823 1,195 497 622 548 110 363 310 5, 684 li 141 75 822 1,196 500 622 548 111 361 308 5,678 i; 134 75 818 1, 221 494 616 542 110 359 309 For definition of production workers, see footnote 1, table A-3. Preliminary. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis N o t e : The seasonal adjustment method used is described in “New Seasonal Adjustment Factors for Labor Force Components.” Monthly Labor Review, August 1960, pp. 822-827. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 924 T able A-6. Unemployment insurance and employment service program operations 1 [All items except average benefit amounts are in thousands] 1965 1966 Item Employment service:2 New applications for work. Nonfarm placements_____ Mar. Apr. May 906 568 806 533 Feb. 850 547 Dec. Jan. 852 460 905 452 Oct. Nov. 707 462 795 531 Sept. 806 611 Aug. 857 644 June July 883 603 945 554 May 1,410 610 890 573 State unemployment insurance programs: 1,078 870 976 763 1,285 760 1,004 791 769 985 1,399 665 693 Initial claims 34_____________________ Insured unem ploym ent3(average weekly 1,132 1,059 1,102 959 1,179 1,033 916 1, 307 1,590 1,301 1,644 862 1,044 volume) 6_________________________ 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.7 3.0 2.3 2.0 2.9 3.6 3.7 1.9 2.3 Rate of insured unem ploym ent7______ 4,101 3,965 4,142 4,450 3,669 4, 555 3,129 3,495 5,852 5,653 3,385 4,098 5,587 Weeks of unemployment compensated__ Average weekly benefit amount for total $38.86 $39.38 $39.83 $39. 66 $39.36 $38.81 $38. 08 $37.32 $37.23 $36.58 $36. 40 $36.07 $36.40 unemployment____________________ $126,149 $155,494 $225,472 $217,171 $212,659 $172,110 $132,158 $117, 784 $138, 580 $148,021 $149, 495 $156,276 $165,717 Total benefits paid___________ _____ Unemployment compensation for ex-service men: 8 8 Initial claims 36_____________________ Insured unemployment8 (average weekly volume)________________ _______ Weeks of unemployment compensated . . . Total benefits paid_______ ______ 12 13 17 18 20 20 18 16 19 25 26 22 17 33 119 $4,461 30 134 $5,241 33 142 $5,339 18 76 $2,936 22 92 $3,558 27 121 $4,620 31 120 $4,572 32 126 $4,816 29 111 $4, 278 25 94 $3,654 24 95 $3,712 28 120 $4,637 33 135 $5,197 7 7 8 11 19 12 10 10 9 9 12 10 8 21 87 $3, 691 22 79 $3,182 20 91 $4,008 22 92 $3,919 Unemployment compensation for Federal c i v i l i a n e m p l o y e e s : 810 Initial claims 3______________________ Insured unem ploym ent8(average weekly volume)__________________________ Total benefits paid_ Railroad unemployment insurance: Applications 11______________________ Insured unemployment (average weekly volume)__________________________ Number of payments 12---------------------Average amount of benefit payment 13_._ Total benefits paid 14------------------------All programs: 18 Insured unemployment A 18 78 $3,217 21 92 $3, 718 26 118 $4,717 29 109 $4,319 23 94 $3,740 21 82 $3,336 20 74 $3,141 19 79 $3,338 42 6 5 4 11 14 9 7 11 10 30 19 5 18 77 $50.55 $3,750 23 53 $69.79 $3,606 26 69 $77.68 $5,154 28 54 $79.10 $4,148 30 68 $77. 32 $5,092 28 66 $71.04 $4,587 25 52 $75. 8f $3,840 22 50 $74. 20 $3,550 24 52 $74.03 $3,746 22 52 $76.09 $3,793 24 48 $75.15 $3,494 21 53 $73.39 $3,794 26 62 $71.27 $4,264 916 1,112 1,381 1,679 1,739 1,394 1,123 1,013 1,067 1,218 1,255 1,182 1,316 1 Includes data for Puerto Rico beginning January 1961 when the Common wealth’s program became part of the Federal-State UI system. 2 Includes Guam and the Virgin Islands. 3 Initial claims are notices filed by workers to indicate they are starting periods of unemployment. Excludes transitions claims under State programs. 4 Includes interstate claims for the Virgin Islands. 8 Number of workers reporting the completion of at least 1 week of unem ployment. 8 Initial claims and State insured unemployment include data under the program for Puerto Rican sugarcane workers. 7 The rate is the number of insured unemployed expressed as a percent of the average covered employment in a 12-month period. 8 Excludes data on claims and payments made jointly with other programs. 8 Includes the Virgin Islands. 18 Excludes data on claims and payments made jointly with State programs. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 29 100 $3,973 11 An application for benefits is filed by a railroad worker at the beginning of his first period of unemployment in a benefit year; no application is re quired for subsequent periods in the same year. 72 Payments are for unemployment in 14-day registration periods. 13 The average amount is an average for all compensable periods, not ad justed for recovery of overpayments or settlement of underpayments. 14Adjusted for recovery of overpayments and settlement of underpayments. 78 Represents an unduplicated count of insured unemployment under the State, Ex-servicemen and U C FE programs and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. S o u r c e : U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Employment Security for all items except railroad unemployment insurance which is prepared by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board. B.—LABOR TURNOVER 925 B.—Labor Turnover T able B -l. Labor turnover rates, by major industry group 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [Per 100 employees] 1966 1965 Annual average Major industry group May 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July 4.5 May 1965 5.6 /. K 4.1 À1 4.3 4. 0 3. 7 2 0 June 1964 Accessions: Total Manufacturing: Actual________ ___________ Seasonally adjusted____ _ ____ ____ Durable goods__________ _____ . . Ordnance and accessories___________ Lumber and wood products, except furniture_______ _ _ ______ _ _ Furniture and fixtures______________ Stone, clay, and glass products..- ___ Primary metal industries... . ____ Fabricated metal p ro d u c ts .___ . _ Machinery__ . . . . . . _ ____ . _ Electrical equipment and supplies. . . . Transportation equipment______ . . . Instruments and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing Industries____________________________ Nondurable goods_______ _ ____ . Food and kindred products_________ Tobacco manufactures.. _____ _ _ _. Textile mill products......... _ ____ Apparel and related products________ Paper and allied products____ ______ Printing, publishing, and allied Industries______ . . . __ _. _ Chemicals and allied products______ Petroleum refining and related Industries___ _____________ __________ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products.. ____________________ Leather and leather products________ N onmanufacturing: Metal m ining.. ___ _ _____ C oalm ining_____ ____ _ __ _____ 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.2 4.2 4.8 4.6 k. 9 3.1 J,. 9 6 0 4.5 4. 5.5 4./) 5.4 /, P 4.7 3.7 4.6 3.7 4.9 3.9 4.2 3.5 4.7 3.5 3.1 2.1 3.9 2.9 4.2 3.5 5.3 3.7 5.1 4.2 4.0 5.3 3. 6 4.1 3.9 2. 8 4.1 3.0 8.5 6.8 5.1 3.7 5.4 3.8 4.6 4.1 4.0 8.8 6.3 5.5 3.4 5.0 3.6 4.3 4.2 3.4 7.2 6.5 5.7 3.9 5.2 3.8 4.7 5.4 3.8 5.9 5.6 3.8 3.5 4.6 3.5 4.2 4.3 3.5 6.0 5.7 4.0 4.0 5.0 3.9 4.6 5.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 2.4 2.7 3.2 2.7 3.4 3.5 2.5 4.8 5.3 2.8 3.0 4.3 3.4 4.2 4.1 2.9 5.4 6.2 3.4 2.5 4.9 3.3 4.6 4.7 3.2 6.7 6.9 4.2 2.9 6.0 3.8 5.1 7.9 3.8 6.1 7.3 3.9 3.0 5.7 3.5 4.8 7.2 4.1 5 .9 5 .5 4.1 2.7 4.4 3.1 3.4 4.2 3. 5 8.4 5. 8 5.7 4.5 5 .9 4 .6 4 .6 5.3 4 .6 7.2 5.1 4.6 2.8 4.3 3.0 3.4 4.0 2.9 6.0 5.4 4. 0 2. 9 4.6 3.3 3.9 4.7 3.2 6.5 6.9 6.9 6.5 6.9 3.3 4.7 6.3 8.1 8.5 7.7 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.7 5.3 6.7 3.8 5.5 6.8 4.3 4.7 5.7 3.0 5.5 5.6 3.7 4.8 5.5 4.2 5.3 5.8 3.9 4.2 4.6 4.4 4.4 5.8 3.2 4.4 4.4 4.9 4.6 6.4 3.2 3.0 3.4 7.4 3.1 3.7 2.3 4.0 5.1 4.1 4.0 4.9 2.9 4.8 6.8 4.7 4.6 5.7 3.4 5.8 9.0 9.1 5.3 6.1 4.0 5.9 9.4 18.1 5.2 6.6 3.7 5 .4 8 .1 7.9 4.4 7.5 3.1 6.1 8.6 4.4 5.0 7.0 5.3 4.4 6.1 3.5 4.4 5.9 3.0 4.6 6.2 5.9 4.4 5.8 3.2 4. 3 6.1 6.7 3.8 5 .5 2.8 3.8 3.0 3.4 2.8 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.6 3.2 2.5 2.5 1.7 3.0 2.0 3.4 2.1 4.2 2.6 3.5 2.3 3. 2 2. 2 4.5 4.0 2.9 2.4 3.2 2.4 3.1 2.1 2.5 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.9 3.7 1.9 1.8 1.6 5.5 6.1 4.9 5.5 5.2 6.0 4.4 6.1 4.7 7.1 3.1 4.4 4.4 5.5 4.9 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.2 6.0 4 .6 6.7 5.6 6.4 4.1 5.4 4.4 5.4 3.9 5 .1 3.6 1.7 3.4 1.7 2.9 1.7 2.9 1.4 3.4 1.8 2.5 1.1 2.8 1.5 2.6 1.8 3.2 1.8 4.0 2.1 3.1 2. 3 5.8 2.0 3.3 1.8 3.2 1.7 3.2 1.7 3.9 5.3 48 3.8 30 4.2 30 3 .3 41 2.8 Accessions: New hires Manufacturing: A ctual.. . ______________________ Seasonally adjusted__________ _ ____ _ _____ Durable goods_____ Ordnance and accessories____ ___ Lumber and wood products, except furniture__ . . __ _______ _____ Furniture and fixtures.. . _______ Stone, clay, and glass products__ ____ Primary metal industries. .. ______ Fabricated metal products. ___ . . . Machinery ___________ . Electrical equipment and supplies____ Transportation equipment _____ Instrum ents and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries________ ____ _______ Nondurable goods_____ _ _ Food and kindred products___ Tobacco manufactures___ _ _ Textile mill products____ _ ___ Apparel and related products___ Paper and allied products... _ _ Printing, publishing, and allied industries___________________________ Chemicals and allied products_______ Petroleum refining and related industries________ _ _ . . . . .. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products_____ ________ _ ____ Leather and leather products__ _ . . . N onmanufacturing: Metal mining____ ______ Coal m in in g .__ ______ ______ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.9 3.7 4.3 3.1 3. 9 3.2 S.9 2.2 4.0 2.9 3.7 3.5 33 4.0 3 1 3.9 3.2 P3 4.3 3 1 3.0 3.1 2 .6 P 9 3.9 2.7 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.0 3.2 2.8 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.3 2.9 1.8 3. 4 2.1 3.8 2 .3 3.5 2.8 2.8 2 .3 4.2 2.7 2.9 1.6 3.0 1.8 2.4 1.1 7.4 6.2 4.2 3.1 4.7 3.4 3.9 2.8 3.6 7.0 5.6 4.1 2.7 4.1 3.1 3.5 3.0 3.1 6.0 5.8 3.8 2.7 4.2 3.2 3.9 3.3 3.3 4.5 4.9 2.6 2.1 3.6 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 4.4 4.9 2.5 2.0 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.3 1.5 1.3 2.4 2.1 2.7 2.2 2.1 4.2 4.6 2.1 1.6 3.4 2.6 3.3 2.8 2.5 4.8 5. 4 2. 8 1.6 4 .0 2.7 3.7 3.5 2. 8 5 .9 6. 3 3. 4 2.0 4.7 3.0 3.8 3. 9 3. 2 5.4 6.5 3.1 2.0 4.1 2.6 3.5 3.0 3.3 4.9 4.7 3.1 1.9 3.2 2. 2 2.5 2.6 2. 6 7 .3 5.0 4. 5 3.7 4.7 3. 8 3.5 3.6 3.9 5.6 4.4 3.3 2.0 3.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 4.7 4.7 2.7 2.0 3.5 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.6 4.1 3. 9 2. 4 1.8 2 .9 2. 2 2.1 2.2 1.9 P9 5.0 5.3 5.0 4.3 4.1 2.5 3.9 5.3 6.8 7.0 4. 5 5.3 4.0 4.5 3. 8 4.1 4.8 2.3 4.6 4.6 3.8 3.6 3.9 1.8 4.5 4.1 3.2 3.6 3.4 1.9 4.2 4.4 3.3 3.0 2.8 1.8 3.4 3.7 2.6 3.0 2.7 1.9 3.4 4.0 2.6 2.1 2.1 4.3 2.4 2.2 1.8 2.9 3.3 1.2 3.2 3.3 2.5 3.6 4.8 3.1 3.8 4.0 3 .0 4.3 6.2 5.4 4.3 4.4 3.4 4.4 7.0 11.9 4.1 4.5 3.1 3.6 5.6 3.1 3. 2 4.1 2. 4 4.4 5 .9 2.5 4.1 4.3 4.4 3.1 4.1 1.6 3.5 3.7 2.3 3.2 4. 1 3.2 3.4 3.7 2.5 2.8 3.8 3.7 2.7 3.3 2.0 3.2 2.5 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.0 2.5 1.9 1.9 1.2 2.4 1.5 2 .9 1.7 3.6 2.1 2.9 1.8 2. 6 1.7 3.6 3. 4 2.2 1.8 2.6 1.9 2.4 1.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.2 .8 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 3.1 1.5 1.4 1.1 4.7 4.7 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.7 3.5 4.4 3.5 5.1 2.4 3.3 3.6 4.2 4.0 4. 3 4.4 4.4 3.8 4.6 3.1 4. 3 4.5 4.8 2.9 3.8 3.3 3.9 2 .6 3.4 2.4 1.1 2.1 1.0 2.1 1.1 2.0 .9 1.9 1.0 1.8 .7 1.9 .9 2 .0 2.6 1.0 2.2 1.0 2.4 4 .9 1.1 2.3 .8 2.2 .9 2.1 .9 1.1 .9 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 926 T able B -l. Labor turnover rates, by major industry group 1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. [P e r io o e m p lo y e e s ] 1966 1965 Annual average Major industry group M ay2 Apr.2 Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June May 1965 1964 Separations: Total Manufacturing: Actual___________________________ Seasonally adjusted_________________ Durable goods______________________ Ordnance and accessories --------------Lumber and wood products, except furniture________________________ Furniture and fixtures______________ Stone, clay, and glass products---------Primary metal industries___________ Fabricated metal products---------------Machinery________________________ Electrical equipment and supplies-----Transportation equipment__________ Instruments and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries______________ ________ _____ Nondurable goods ------ -------Food and kindred products_________ Tobacco manufactures_____________ Textile mill products_______ _______ Apparel and related products. --------Paper and allied products___________ Printing, publishing, and allied industries.. ________________________ Chemicals and allied products______ Petroleum refining and related industries . . _______________________ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products____________________________ Leather and leather products________ N onmanufacturing: Metal mining_____________________ Coal mining _____________________ 4.1 4-4 4.3 4.7 4.1 4.6 3.6 4.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 S.9 3.9 4.4 4-1 5.7 4.4 6.1 4.7 4.3 4.0 3.6 4.0 S.9 3.6 4.0 3.9 3.9 2.5 3.9 2.8 3.8 2.4 3.5 2.1 3.7 2.1 3.6 1.6 3.6 2.1 4.1 2.4 5.2 3.3 5.1 2.8 4.1 2.7 3.3 2.4 3.2 2.3 3.8 2.5 3.6 3.3 6.7 6.2 4.1 2.7 4.6 3.1 3.4 3.9 3.0 7.1 6.2 4.1 2.6 4.7 3.3 3.4 3.9 3.0 7.2 6.1 3.7 2.6 4.5 3.1 3.5 3.8 2.8 5.3 5.2 3.7 2.3 4.1 2.6 3.0 4.2 2.5 6.2 5.0 4.5 2.6 4.2 2.9 3.2 3.9 2.7 6.6 4.3 4.3 2.9 3.9 2.3 2.9 3.2 2.2 6.2 4.7 4.0 3.5 3.9 2.5 2.8 3.4 2.2 6.1 5.6 4.1 4.8 4.8 3.0 3.2 4.0 3.1 8.4 6.9 5.4 5.5 5.8 4.3 4.3 4.8 3.6 6.7 6.2 4.2 3.7 5.5 3.6 3.6 8.8 3.2 5.5 5.6 3.5 2.6 4.5 3.0 3.3 6.2 3.0 5.2 4.7 3.5 2.3 4.0 2.7 3.0 3.4 2.5 5.1 4.9 3.5 2.3 3.8 2.4 2.9 3.2 2.4 6.0 5.1 3.9 3.0 4.2 2.8 3.1 4.2 2.7 5.5 4.6 3.7 2.3 4.1 2.6 3.2 4.1 2.7 5.7 5.4 5.0 4.7 5.6 11.3 7.0 5.7 7.0 5.9 5.9 5.2 5.2 6.0 5.7 4.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 5.6 3.5 4.7 5.7 6.6 5.0 6.7 3.5 4.4 5.6 6.0 4.7 5.6 3.3 3.8 5.1 5.4 3.9 4.5 2.9 4.5 5.9 9.1 4.4 5.7 3.3 4.6 6.9 6.9 4.0 5.8 3.1 4.4 6.9 10.6 3.8 5.2 2.9 4.9 7.9 8.1 4.2 5.5 3.2 6.3 9.9 5.5 5.2 6.2 5.3 5.1 6.7 8.4 4.8 6.1 4.1 4.7 5.4 5.6 4.4 7.9 2.8 3.9 4.9 2.7 3.7 5.3 2.7 4.0 4.9 4.1 3.9 5.9 2.7 4.4 6.1 6.2 4.1 5.8 3.1 4.3 6.0 6.8 3.8 5.6 2.8 3.0 2.6 3.2 2.4 2.9 2.3 2.8 1.8 3.3 2.1 3.1 1.9 2.9 1.8 3.2 2.2 4.3 3.6 3.7 2.6 2.7 1.9 3.1 2.3 2.8 2.5 3.1 2.2 3.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.1 3.2 2.4 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.9 1.8 4.7 5.6 4.7 6.3 4.6 6.2 3.9 5.1 4.0 6.1 3.9 5.6 4.1 4.6 4.5 5.2 5.9 6.9 4.8 6.2 4.8 6.5 3.9 4.6 4.0 4.8 4.2 5.3 3.8 5.0 2.7 1.9 3.1 2.2 3.2 1.9 2.4 1.5 2.4 1.7 3.3 1.7 3.2 1.9 3.1 1.7 5.3 1.8 3.6 1.9 3.7 1.7 2.8 1.6 2.3 2.3 3.1 1.9 2.9 1.8 Separations: Quits Manufacturing: Actual.. . ----------------- . . . . . . . . Seasonally adjusted___ _ . .. 2.4 «.4 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.7 1.8 2.4 1.4 1.7 2.4 2 .2 2 .2 2.0 2.0 2.6 1.8 1. 8 1.8 1.7 17 1.7 17 1.9 1.5 Durable goods . . . . -----------— -----Ordnance and accessories. . . . . . . . Lumber and wood products, except furniture___ .. . ----- ------- — Furniture and fixtures---- ------ ---------Stone, clay, and glass p rod u cts...----Primary metal industries________ .. Fabricated metal products ------------Machinery... _ . . . Electrical equipment and supplies____ Transportation equipment______ ____ Instruments and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries____ . _________ .. -------- 2.3 1.2 2.3 1.4 2.2 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.7 1.2 1.3 .8 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.2 3.2 1.9 2.4 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.6 1.1 1.6 1.0 1.7 1.1 1.3 .9 5.0 4.5 2.3 1.5 2.8 1.9 2.1 1.6 2.0 5.2 4.5 2.4 1.5 2.7 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.9 4.3 4.3 2.0 1.4 2.5 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.8 3.2 3.3 1.6 1.1 2.0 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.5 2.8 3.1 1.6 1.1 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.5 2.5 2.4 1.2 .8 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.2 3.1 3.0 1.5 .9 1.8 1.2 1.5 1.1 1.3 3.9 3.6 1.9 1.2 2.3 1.5 1.8 1.5 2.0 6.3 5.0 3.3 2.9 3.5 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.5 4.5 4.3 2.4 1.9 2.8 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.9 3.4 3.0 1.6 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.2 3.3 2.7 1.6 1.0 1.8 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.3 3.4 3.1 1.6 1.1 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.2 3.4 3.1 1.6 1.2 1.9 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.4 2.8 2.4 1.3 .9 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.5 3.3 4.9 3.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.0 Nondurable goods___________________ Food and kindred products.. _____ Tobacco manufactures______ . . . ._ Textile mill products___ . . . _____ Apparel and related products.. . ------Paper and allied products__ _____ _. Printing, publishing, and allied industries______ ___________________ Chemicals and allied products____. .. Petroleum refining and related industries____________ . _______ __ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products__ _ ________ . . . . . .. Leather and leatlter products________ 2.6 2.9 1.7 3.7 3.2 2.2 2.7 2.7 1.6 3.7 3.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.7 3.3 2.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.6 2.5 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.9 2.2 1.3 2.4 2.4 1.5 2.5 3.2 1.6 2.9 2.9 1.9 3.9 5.4 2.6 3.9 3.6 3.8 2.9 3.6 2.8 3.4 3.5 2.4 2.0 2.3 1.2 2.5 2.9 1.4 1.9 2.1 1.1 2.3 2.4 1.5 1.9 2.0 1.2 2.6 2.5 1.4 2.1 2.4 1.5 2.5 2.6 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.3 2.1 2.2 1.3 1.9 1.3 2.0 1.3 1.8 1.2 1.7 .9 1.8 1.0 1.4 .7 1.5 .8 1.8 1.0 2.9 2.5 2.3 1.5 1.5 .9 1.8 .9 1.5 .9 1.7 1.0 1.5 .8 .9 .7 .5 .5 .5 .5 .9 1.8 1.3 .7 .6 .6 .7 .6 3.0 3.8 2-9 4.0 2.7 3.9 2.2 3.2 2.1 3.3 1.7 2.7 2.2 2.9 2.5 3.5 3.6 4.6 2.7 4.0 1.9 3.2 1.9 2.8 2.0 2.9 2.1 3.0 1.5 2.4 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 .6 .6 2.3 .8 .4 4.2 .8 .5 1.5 .7 1.5 .7 .8 .6 .6 .5 .6 .6 .5 N onmanufacturing: Metal mining.________ . . . ________ Coal mining______________________ S e e f o o t n o t e s a t e n d o f t a b le . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1.9 2.2 3.5 .8 B — LABOR TURNOVER T able B -l. 927 Labor turnover rates, by major industry group 1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. [ P e r 100 e m p lo y e e s ] 1966 1965 A nnual average M a jo r in d u s t r y g ro u p M a y .2 A p r. M ar. F eb. Jan. D ec. N ov. O ct. S e p t. A ug. J u ly June M ay 1965 1.1 1. 4 1.1 1 .4 1. 7 .9 .8 1. 2 .8 1 8 .8 .8 1.1 1 .0 1964 S e p a r a t io n s : L a y o f f s M a n u fa c tu r in g : A c t u a l ________________ _____________________ S e a s o n a l l y a d j u s t e d ________________________ D u r a b l e g o o d s ________________________________ O r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s ________________ L u m b er a n d w o o d p ro d u cts, ex cep t f u r n i t u r e _____________ - .. _______ F u r n i t u r e a n d f ix t u r e s ____________________ S t o n e , c l a y , a n d g l a s s p r o d u c t s __________ P r i m a r y m e t a l i n d u s t r i e s ________________ F a b r i c a t e d m e t a l p r o d u c t s _______________ M a c h i n e r y _______ ________________________ E l e c t r i c a l e q u i p m e n t a n d s u p p l i e s ........... T r a n s p o r t a t i o n e q u i p m e n t . _ _______ I n s t r u m e n t s a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s ______ M is c e lla n e o u s m a n u f a c t u r in g in d u s t r i e s _____ ___________________________ _ _ 0 .8 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1.0 1.2 1. 1 1 .1 .7 .7 .7 .6 .7 .4 .9 .3 .7 .5 .8 .6 .8 1.8 .6 .8 1 .3 .8 .8 1.8 1.1 1 .5 1.3 1 .4 l.S 1 .3 l.S 1 .5 .3 1.2 1.2 .6 2 .5 .9 3 .3 2.1 1.0 .7 2 .1 2 .4 1 .3 1 .5 .4 1.8 1.8 1.2 .4 .3 .3 .4 1 .4 .4 .8 1 .0 1.1 1.1 .3 .4 1 .4 .3 .4 .4 1 .3 .4 .4 .4 .3 .4 .7 1 .3 .4 .5 1.2 2.0 1.6 .4 .3 .4 1.3 .5 1 .4 .3 .5 .5 1 .4 .3 .6 1.6 1.8 /. 7 1. 6 1 .8 .6 1 .8 .8 1 .0 0 .4 1.2 1 .0 1 .0 1.2 .9 1 .4 .7 .7 .9 .9 .8 1.1 1.2 1.1 .8 1 .0 1 .7 .7 .9 .5 1 .3 2.6 1 .7 1 .4 .7 .4 1 .4 .4 1.2 .8 .6 1 .8 1.0 1 .3 .4 6.1 .6 4 .2 .7 1 .5 1.2 .6 .7 1 .9 1.1 1.2 .6 1 4 1 .7 1 .5 1 .5 1. 9 1 .3 1. 7 .8 1. 8 .8 .4 1 .0 1.2 1 .4 .5 .7 1 .3 .5 .6 .8 2.1 .6 2 .3 .9 1.2 1 .4 1.2 .9 1 .3 3 .0 8 .5 3 .3 1.2 .9 1.1 2.6 1 .9 1 .7 2 .4 2 .9 1.1 1 .4 1.1 1 .7 3 .9 1.6 1 .3 2 .3 4 .8 1 .9 2 .5 3 .9 1 .3 1 .5 1 .6 2.2 2. 5 3 .0 4 .3 1 .9 3 .4 4. g 2 .6 2 .0 2 .3 4 .5 5 .5 1 .3 3 .3 1.8 4 .4 .4 1 .3 2 .5 3 .8 .5 .5 .5 .6 2.6 .6 2 .4 .8 .5 .6 .8 .5 .7 N o n d u r a b l e g o o d s _____ ______________ F o o d a n d k i n d r e d p r o d u c t s _____________ T ob acco m a n u fa ctu res. . _____________ T e x t i l e m i l l p r o d u c t s ____________ _______ A p p a r e l a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s _________ P a p e r a n d a l li e d p r o d u c t s ___________ P r i n t i n g , p u b l i s h i n g , a n d a l li e d i n d u s t r i e s __________ _ _ _______________ . C h e m i c a l s a n d a l li e d p r o d u c t s __________ P e t r o l e u m r e f i n i n g a n d r e la t e d i n d u s t r i e s _____ __________ ______ . . R ubber and m is c e l l a n e o u s p la s tic p r o d u c t s _____________________________ _ L e a t h e r a n d l e a t h e r p r o d u c t s __________ 1. 0 N o n m a n u f a c t u r in g : M e t a l m i n i n g ______ __ _ _ _______ __ C o a l m i n i n g ___ ._ __________ _ _ ______ .5 .3 .9 .4 .8 1.1 .6 .6 1 .9 1 .7 .5 1 .7 .4 .6 1 .7 3 .1 7 .0 .9 1 .3 .5 2.1 .8 .6 .9 .5 .6 .6 .4 .4 .5 .5 .7 1 .4 .7 1 .3 .8 2.2 2 .4 3 .6 .9 1 F o r c o m p a r a b i l i t y o f d a t a w i t h t h o s e p u b li s h e d in i s s u e s p r io r t o J a n u a r y 1966, s e e f o o t n o t e 1, t a b l e A - 2 . M o n th -to -m o n th c h a n g e s in t o ta l e m p lo y m e n t in m a n u fa c tu r in g a n d n o n m a n u f a c tu r in g in d u s t r ie s a s in d ic a t e d b y la b o r tu r n o v e r r a te s are n o t c o m p a r a b le w i t h t h e c h a n g e s s h o w n b y t h e B u r e a u ’s e m p l o y m e n t s e r ie s for t h e f o l l o w i n g r e a s o n s : ( 1 ) t h e l a b o r t u r n o v e r s e r ie s m e a s u r e s c h a n g e s https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 .3 1.1 3 .9 8 .9 6.0 .6 1.1 1 .7 .9 4 .1 2 .1 1. 0 .6 2 .2 .8 .5 .5 .9 .5 .7 .6 .7 .9 .8 .5 .5 .5 1.1 1.1 1 .4 1 .3 1 .9 2 .5 .8 .2 .5 .4 .5 .9 3 .5 2 .3 .5 .8 2.1 .5 1 .9 1 .0 .7 .6 .7 .9 .6 .8 .6 .8 .6 1 .3 .7 .8 1.0 1 .0 .7 .9 1 .9 1 .3 1.0 2. 2 .9 1 .0 1.0 1 .3 1.2 1 .0 .5 .4 .8 1 .8 .8 1. n .8 .9 .7 1.1 2.6 ^9 1 0 .3 .6 .7 l.i 1.1 1.2 1 .5 1. 0 1 .3 1 .5 1 .8 1 .4 .5 .6 .6 .1 1 .4 .7 .9 . 7 .9 d u r i n g t h e c a le n d a r m o n t h , w h i l e t h e e m p l o y m e n t s e r i e s m e a s u r e s c h a n g e s fr o m m i d m o n t h t o m i d m o n t h a n d ( 2) t h e t u r n o v e r s e r ie s e x c l u d e s p e r s o n n e l c h a n g e s c a u s e d b y s t r i k e s , b u t t h e e m p l o y m e n t s e r ie s r e f l e c t s t h e i n f l u e n c e o f s u c h s to p p a g e s, s P r e lim in a r y . MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 19G6 928 C.—Earnings and Hours T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 A nnual average In d u str y June2 M ay2 A p r. M ar. F eb. Jan. D ec. N ov. O ct. S e p t. A ug. J u ly 1965 June 1964 A v e r a g e w e e k l y e a r n in g s M i n i n g . ....................................... - -----------------------------M e t a l m i n i n g ________________________________ I r o n o r e s __________________ _________________ C o p p e r o r e s . . ........................ ..........................— C o a l m i n i n g _______________________________ B i t u m i n o u s ________________________________ C r u d e p e t r o l e u m a n d n a t u r a l g a s ________ C r u d e p e t r o l e u m a n d n a t u r a l g a s f ie ld s . O il a n d g a s f ie l d s e r v i c e s ______________ _ Q u a r r y i n g a n d n o n m e t a l l i c m i n i n g ---------C r u s h e d a n d b r o k e n s t o n e ______________ 66 $131. 27 $ 1 2 1 .7 2 $ 1 2 7 .3 7 $ 1 2 6 .3 0 $ 1 2 6 .1 8 $ 1 2 7 .1 2 $ 1 2 3 .7 3 $ 1 2 6 .2 6 $124. 66 $ 1 2 6 .1 4 $ 1 2 2 .9 6 $ 1 2 3 .9 7 $123. 52 $117. 74 1 3 2 .8 2 133. 88 129. 79 1 3 0 .9 4 1 3 2 .1 9 1 3 1 .6 7 1 2 8 .9 6 1 3 0 .3 1 131. 57 127. 71 128. 21 126. 77 1 2 7 .7 1 122. 54 1 3 7 .9 0 136. 20 1 5 2 .3 5 1 5 5 .1 7 121. 98 127. 08 1 1 7 .4 8 1 2 1 .8 3 1 2 0 .4 9 1 3 9 .6 3 1 3 8 .9 7 111. 52 1 1 2 .8 5 1 2 2 .4 1 1 2 9 .1 5 1 1 7 .1 3 1 2 0 .3 1 119. 20 133. 74 1 3 5 .9 9 1 4 3 .4 4 1 4 6 .0 8 121. 69 126. 36 1 1 8 .0 9 1 1 6 .2 2 114. 29 1 3 3 .7 4 1 3 7 .4 9 1 4 2 .4 5 1 4 4 .7 9 1 2 0 .1 3 1 2 7 .3 9 1 1 5 .1 0 1 1 3 .7 0 1 0 9 .0 3 136. 36 1 3 9 .6 4 1 4 2 .0 4 144. 73 1 2 1 .2 7 128. 84 1 1 5 .2 8 1 1 2 .0 5 1 0 7 .6 5 1 3 3 .5 0 129. 52 1 4 0 .6 0 139. 64 1 4 2 .9 6 129. 78 1 4 6 .0 2 1 3 1 .9 8 119. 69 117. 87 1 2 7 .2 0 1 2 7 .1 0 11 4 .1 1 1 1 0 .9 3 117. 78 1 2 3 .0 2 1 1 7 .0 0 1 2 1 .6 4 1 2 9 .3 6 1 4 3 .1 1 1 4 3 .2 4 1 4 6 .3 0 1 1 5 .9 2 1 2 3 .4 2 1 0 9 .9 1 1 2 3 .8 7 1 2 4 .7 1 133. 54 130. 71 143. 44 136. 32 135. 29 141. 98 137. 90 1 44. 67 116. 47 1 1 7 .1 2 125. 55 123. 41 109. 65 1 1 2 .3 3 122 . 62 122. 25 122. 98 123. 50 1 3 3 .2 2 1 3 4 .9 0 1 3 4 .4 6 1 3 7 .1 1 1 1 6 .0 3 123. 71 110 . 06 1 1 9 .9 7 123. 25 1 2 8 .1 3 1 3 3 .6 1 142. 27 145. 67 1 1 3 .9 7 120 . 80 108. 61 141. 72 131. 73 137. 02 133. 33 1 3 9 .9 4 1 5 0 .5 5 1 4 0 .2 2 131. 74 137. 54 134. 64 140. 26 1 4 7 .4 2 1 4 2 .8 8 134. 32 138. 65 133. 95 1 4 2 .6 1 1 4 9 .9 2 1 3 8 .3 0 1 2 9 .9 3 1 3 0 .6 8 1 2 3 .0 0 136. 04 1 4 6 .6 5 1 3 7 .9 7 129. 23 1 3 2 .4 4 126. 96 1 3 7 .2 8 1 4 5 .8 9 139. ,50 1 3 6 .1 4 1 3 2 .1 3 126. 71 131. 87 1 3 5 .8 3 1 2 5 .0 6 133. 87 138. 38 1 3 7 .3 2 1 4 8 .0 0 142. 52 144. 01 1 3 2 .4 9 1 4 9 .4 5 1 5 1 .7 0 146. 01 1 5 0 .0 0 1 3 8 .7 5 128. 52 138. 63 138. 84 1 3 9 .1 2 145. 27 1 4 3 .1 5 131. 33 148. 43 149. 52 1 4 7 .0 0 1 4 8 .9 6 140. 50 1 2 9 .1 5 1 4 3 .3 8 145. 86 1 4 0 .9 0 1 4 7 .0 4 158. 69 139. 2C 1 7 6 .2 2 155. 07 135. 84 1 7 1 .9 7 1 5 5 .9 6 134. 82 1 7 3 .3 8 1 5 4 .7 7 132.83 1 7 1 .3 8 154. 79 1 3 1 .6 7 1 7 3 .1 6 1 5 6 .0 0 135.1C 174. 49 150. 07 132. 59 166. 94 156. 01 140. 54 1 7 4 .3 9 151. 2 6 138. 52 1 6 4 .9 3 153. 27 137. 56 171. 39 140. 30 1 1 7 .9 5 139. 04 1 1 6 .9 0 1 4 2 .4 0 122. 50 1 3 4 .5 2 1 1 9 .0 6 125. 58 13 6 .1 1 118.411 1 1 8 .1 9 130. 26 1 1 3 .1 9 1 3 7 .1 1 1 2 7 .4 1 1 3 4 .9 8 122. 50 Mining................... 42.7 Metal mining______ ___ ____ ______ ______ Iron ores------- ---------------------------- --------Copper ores.---------- --------------------- --------Coal mining........................................................ Bituminous__________ ... Crude petroleum and natural gas______ ______ Crude petroleum and natural gas fields.._____ Oil and gas field services................................... Quarrying and nonmetallic mining___________ Crushed and broken stone________________ 4 2 .9 4 2 .3 4 2 .3 4 3 .1 4 1 .4 4 1 .6 4 2 .5 4 0 .6 4 4 .0 4 5 .8 4 6 .7 4 1 .4 4 2 .5 4 2 .7 4 3 .7 3 2 .8 3 2 .9 4 2 .8 4 1 .0 4 4 .2 4 5 .4 4 6 .2 4 2 .6 4 1 .6 4 0 .9 4 2 .9 4 1 .1 4 1 .5 4 3 .0 4 0 .5 4 4 .9 4 4 .7 4 5 .9 4 2 .1 4 1 .7 4 0 .9 4 3 .1 4 0 .7 4 0 .9 4 2 .3 4 0 .7 4 3 .6 4 3 .9 4 4 .5 4 2 .2 4 2 .1 4 1 .7 4 3 .5 4 0 .7 4 1 .0 4 2 .7 4 0 .9 4 4 .0 4 3 .6 4 4 .3 4 2 .8 4 1 .8 4 0 .7 4 3 .8 4 1 .2 4 1 .6 4 2 .9 4 0 .9 4 4 .4 4 5 .3 4 6 .8 4 1 .8 4 1 .2 4 0 .1 4 3 .5 3 7 .4 3 7 .6 4 2 .4 4 1 .0 4 3 .5 4 6 .6 4 7 .7 4 2 .8 4 1 .5 4 0 .3 4 3 .9 4 1 .4 4 1 .8 4 2 .0 4 0 .6 4 3 .1 4 7 .1 4 9 .1 Contract construction____ ____ ______ _ 38.4 General building contractors________________ Heavy construction-------- ---------------- -------Highway and street construction____ ______ Other heavy construction................................. Special trade contractors___ _____ ___ ______ Plumbing, heating, and air condition- 3 7 .1 3 5 .7 3 9 .6 3 9 .8 3 9 .2 3 6 .9 3 6 .9 3 5 .8 4 0 .1 4 0 .8 3 9 .4 3 6 .4 3 7 .7 3 6 .8 4 0 .9 4 1 .6 4 0 .4 3 7 .2 3 6 .3 3 5 .5 3 8 .1 3 8 .2 3 8 .0 3 6 .3 3 6 .5 3 5 .6 3 9 .3 3 9 .8 3 9 .0 3 6 .2 3 7 .1 3 6 .4 3 8 .9 3 8 .6 3 9 .2 3 7 .0 3 6 .4 3 5 .1 3 9 .6 4 0 .2 3 8 .9 3 5 .9 3 8 .8 3 5 .6 3 8 .9 3 8 .1 3 5 .1 3 8 .3 3 8 .7 3 5 .2 3 8 .7 3 8 .5 3 4 .5 3 8 .6 3 8 .6 3 4 .2 3 9 .0 3 9 .0 35. C 3 9 .3 3 4 .9 3 3 .7 3 4 .5 3 3 .4 3 5 .6 3 4 .9 3 3 .8 3 2 .8 3 2 .2 3 2 .8 3 4 .9 3 3 .2 $3. 06 3 .1 4 3 .2 6 3 .1 6 3 .6 8 3 .7 3 2 .8 7 3 .1 3 2 .6 7 $ 2 .9 4 3 .1 5 3 .2 7 3 .1 8 3 .4 0 3 .4 3 2 .5 8 3 .1 5 2. 65 2 .6 5 2 .5 8 $ 2 .9 9 3 .1 2 3 .2 7 3 .1 7 3 .4 9 3 .5 2 2 .8 3 3 .1 2 2 .6 3 2 .6 0 2 .4 9 $ 3 .0 0 3 .1 4 3 .2 7 3 .1 9 3 .5 0 3 .5 4 2 .8 4 3 .1 3 2 .6 4 2 .5 9 2 .4 5 $ 2 .9 9 3 .1 4 3 .2 7 3 .2 1 3 .4 9 3 .5 3 2 .8 4 3 .1 5 2 . 62 2 .5 7 2 .4 3 $ 2 .9 7 3 .1 5 3 .2 8 3. 21 3 .4 7 3. 51 2 .7 9 3 .1 1 2 .5 7 2 .6 0 2 .5 0 $ 2 .9 6 3 .1 3 3 .2 3 3 .2 1 3 .4 7 3. 51 2. 78 3 .1 0 2. 55 2 .6 4 2. 55 3. 82 3. 69 3 .4 6 3 .3 5 3. 57 4 .0 8 3. 80 3 .6 8 3 .4 3 3. 30 3. 56 4 .0 5 3. 79 3 .6 5 3 .3 9 3 .2 2 3 .5 3 4 .0 3 3 .8 1 3 .6 6 3 .4 3 3 .2 2 3 .5 8 4 .0 4 3 .7 8 3 .6 3 3 .3 7 3 .1 9 3. 52 4 .0 3 3. 76 3 .6 3 3 .3 9 3 .2 4 3 .5 3 4 .0 0 4 .0 9 3 .9 1 4 .5 3 4. 07 3 .8 7 4 .4 9 4 .0 3 3 .8 3 4. 48 4 .0 2 3 .8 5 4 .4 4 4. 01 3 .8 5 4 .4 4 4 .0 2 3. 50 4 .0 3 3 .5 0 4 .0 0 3. 51 3 .9 8 3 .6 3 3 .9 0 3 .6 1 C o n t r a c t c o n s t r u c t i o n ________________________ G e n e r a l b u i l d i n g c o n t r a c t o r s -------------------H e a v y c o n s t r u c t i o n ________________________ H i g h w a y a n d s t r e e t c o n s t r u c t i o n ______ O t h e r h e a v y c o n s t r u c t i o n ______________ S p e c i a l t r a d e c o n t r a c t o r s __________________ P l u m b i n g , h e a t i n g , a n d a ir c o n d i t i o n i n g ------- -------------------- -----------------------------P a in t in g , p a p e r h a n g in g , a n d d e c o r a tin g . E l e c t r i c a l w o r k ------------------- ---------------------M a s o n r y , p la s te r in g , s t o n e , a n d t ile w o r k ________ ________ ____________________ R o o f i n g a n d s h e e t m e t a l w o r k __________ .6 9 1 2 9 .2 4 1 3 6 .7 1 1 3 7 .3 8 140. 23 1 1 5 .9 0 1 2 3 .6 2 1 1 0 .3 1 1 1 7 .4 5 116. 58 1 2 5 .8 3 130. 42 126. 82 128. 91 1 1 3 .0 5 1 2 0 .9 5 1 0 6 .1 9 1 1 1 .8 5 110 . 62 1 3 9 .0 8 127. 78 140. 53 140. 68 1 4 0 .0 1 1 4 5 .8 6 138. 01 1 2 8 .1 6 1 3 7 .5 0 138. 45 1 4 4 .6 5 1 3 2 .0 6 1 2 2 .7 9 131. 78 129. 58 133. 93 138. 35 1 5 2 .1 0 135. 42 168. 44 1 5 1 .3 2 1 3 6 .8 8 169. 22 151. 31 133. 52 1 6 8 .6 8 1 4 4 .0 2 1 2 8 .1 6 1 6 5 .1 7 1 4 0 .5 0 1 2 2 .3 0 1 3 8 .2 2 123. 65 1 3 7 .0 3 120 . 01 1 3 3 .2 1 117. 30 127. 31 112. 49 4 2 .4 4 1 .9 4 1 .6 4 4 .0 3 9 .1 3 9 .4 4 2 .2 4 1 .3 4 3 .0 4 6 .8 4 8 .8 4 3 .2 4 1 .6 4 2 .3 4 2 .6 4 0 .8 4 1 .1 4 2 .9 4 1 .0 4 4 .4 4 7 .2 4 9 .6 4 2 .4 4 1 .9 4 2 .7 4 3 .1 4 2 .5 4 1 .1 4 3 .5 4 6 .5 4 9 .3 4 2 .6 4 1 .7 4 1 .2 4 3 .1 4 1 .0 4 1 .5 4 1 .9 4 0 .4 4 3 .1 4 6 .7 4 8 .6 4 2 .3 4 1 .6 4 0 .9 4 3 .4 3 9 .9 4 0 .2 4 2 .3 4 0 .8 4 3 .6 4 5 .7 4 7 .2 4 1 .9 4 1 .4 4 0 .2 4 2 .9 3 9 .0 3 9 .2 4 2 .5 4 1 .0 4 3 .7 4 5 .1 4 5 .9 3 8 .3 3 6 .6 4 2 .7 4 4 .1 4 0 .9 3 7 .5 3 7 .1 3 5 .6 4 0 .3 4 1 .2 3 9 .3 3 6 .5 3 8 .9 3 7 .1 4 3 .4 4 4 .5 4 2 .0 3 8 .0 3 8 .6 3 6 .9 4 2 .8 4 4 .2 4 1 .2 3 7 .8 3 8 .0 3 6 .3 4 1 .7 4 2 .5 4 0 .7 3 7 .4 3 7 .4 3 6 .1 4 0 .8 4 1 .7 3 9 .9 3 6 .9 3 7 .2 3 5 .8 4 0 .8 4 1 .4 4 0 .1 3 6 .6 3 7 .8 3 4 .8 3 7 .6 3 9 .1 3 6 .6 3 9 .1 3 8 .1 3 5 .7 3 7 .4 3 9 .1 3 6 .2 3 9 .4 3 9 .0 36. C 3 8 .9 3 8 .9 3 6 .5 3 8 .9 3 8 .6 3 5 .7 3 8 .6 3 8 .1 3 5 .7 3 8 .5 3 3 .4 3 3 .0 3 4 .8 3 6 .3 3 4 .7 3 5 .1 3 6 .4 3 6 .4 3 5 .9 3 6 . 8l 3 5 .5 3 5 .4 1 3 4 .6 3 4 .5 3 4 .5 3 4 .4 $ 2 .9 5 3 .1 4 3 .2 1 3 .2 6 3 .4 6 3 .5 0 2 .7 6 3 .0 4 2 .5 5 2 .6 3 2 .5 4 $ 2 .9 4 3 .1 4 3 .2 1 3 .2 6 3 .4 6 3. 50 2 .7 6 3 .0 4 2. 55 2 . 62 2 .5 2 $ 2 .9 2 3 .0 7 3 .0 9 3 .2 0 3 .4 8 3 .5 2 2 .7 3 3. 01 2 .5 3 2 .5 9 2 .4 9 $ 2 .9 0 3 .0 6 3 .1 2 3 .1 3 $ 2 .9 2 3 .0 7 3 .1 6 3 .1 5 3 .4 5 3 .4 9 2 .7 4 3 .0 3 2 .5 3 2 .5 7 2 .4 7 $ 2 . 81 2 .9 6 3 .1 3 3 .0 4 3 .2 6 3 .3 0 2 .7 3 3. 01 2 .5 3 2 .5 8 2. 50 $ 2 .9 1 3 .0 4 3 .1 1 3 .1 0 3 .4 7 3 .5 1 2 .7 2 2 .9 9 2 .5 2 2 .5 7 2 .4 6 3 .7 4 3. 61 3. 43 3 .3 3 3 .5 3 3. 97 3 .7 6 3 .6 2 3 .5 0 3 .4 4 3. 57 4 .0 0 3 .7 4 3 .6 1 3 .4 4 3 .3 7 3 .5 4 3 .9 8 3 .6 8 3 .5 4 3 .4 2 3 .3 6 3 .5 0 3 .9 2 3 .6 4 3 .5 0 3 .3 5 3 .3 0 3 .4 2 3 .8 9 3 .6 6 3 .5 2 3 .3 7 3 .3 1 3 .4 4 3 .9 0 3 .6 9 3 .5 5 3 .3 7 3. 27 3 .4 7 3 .9 2 3 .5 5 3 .4 3 3 .2 3 3 .1 3 3 .3 4 3 .7 8 4 .0 0 3 .8 6 4. 44 3 .9 7 3 .8 1 4 .4 4 3 .9 9 3 .8 4 4 .4 6 3 .9 7 3 .8 8 4 .4 1 3 .9 2 3.8C 4 .3 5 3 .9 0 3 .6 7 4 .3 3 3. 89 3 .7 5 4 .3 5 3 .9 2 3 .7 4 4. 37 3 .7 8 3 .5 9 4 .2 9 3 .9 0 3 .5 6 3. 90 3. 43 3 .9 4 3 .5 1 3 .8 9 3 .4 9 3 .8 6 3 .3 6 3 .8 5 3 .3 6 3 .8 6 3 .3 9 3 .8 5 3 .4 0 3 .6 9 3 .2 7 120.02 119. 56 136. 36 A v e r a g e w e e k ly h o u rs P a in t in g , p a p e r h a n g in g a n d d e c o r a tin g E l e c t r i c a l w o r k ____________________________ M a s o n r y , p la s te r in g , s t o n e , a n d t ile w o r k ______________________________________ R o o f i n g a n d s h e e t m e t a l w o r k __________ A v e r a g e h o u r l y e a r n in g s M i n i n g ........ ..................... ....................................... .............. M e t a l m i n i n g ................. .............................................. I r o n o r e s ...................................................................... C o p p e r o r e s ............................... ................ ................ C o a l m i n i n g __________________________________ B i t u m i n o u s . . _____ ________________________ C r u d e p e t r o l e u m a n d n a t u r a l g a s _________ C r u d e p e t r o l e u m a n d n a t u r a l g a s f ie l d s . O il a n d g a s f ie l d s e r v i c e s _________________ Q u a r r y i n g a n d n o n m e t a l l i c m i n i n g _______ C r u s h e d a n d b r o k e n s t o n e ______________ 3 .0 6 C o n t r a c t c o n s t r u c t i o n _________________________ G e n e r a l b u i l d i n g c o n t r a c t o r s _______________ H e a v y c o n s t r u c t i o n _________________________ H i g h w a y a n d s t r e e t c o n s t r u c t i o n _______ O t h e r h e a v y c o n s t r u c t i o n ________ .•_____ S p e c i a l t r a d e c o n t r a c t o r s ___________________ P l u m b i n g , h e a t i n g , a n d a ir c o n d i t i o n i n g ------------------ -------- ---------------------------------P a in t in g , p a p e r h a n g in g a n d d e c o r a tin g . E l e c t r i c a l w o r k . ___________________________ M a s o n r y , p la s te r in g , s t o n e , a n d t ile w o r k _____________________ ________________ R o o f i n g a n d s h e e t m e t a l w o r k __________ 3 .8 2 S e e f o o tn o t e s a t e n d o f t a b le . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2.66 2.86 2. 66 2 .9 5 2 .4 3 2 .4 8 2 .4 1 C.— E A R N IN G S A N D H O U R S T able C -l. 929 Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 A nnual average In d u stry June2 M ay 2 A p r. M ar. F eb. Jan. D ec. N ov. O ct. S e p t. A ug. J u ly June 1965 1964 A v e r a g e w e e k l y e a r n in g s M a n u f a c t u r i n g _______ _________ ________ . . $112.05 $112.05 $111.24 $110.95 $110.27 $110.00 $110.92 $109. 71 $108.62 $107.83 $106.45 $107.01 $107.79 $107. 53 $102.97 D u r a b l e g o o d s . . . _________ __________ 121.82 121.82 121.54 120. 69 120.41 119.99 120.98 119. 43 118.72 117.18 115.51 116.06 117.74 117.18 112.19 N o n d u r a b l e g o o d s _____ ________________ 9 7 .93 95.52 98 .5 8 9 6 .96 9 6 .8 8 96.48 9 6 .3 2 9 5 .68 96 .9 6 95.68 95.11 94.87 94.47 9 4 .64 90. 91 O r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s ____ . . . . . . . . A m m u n i t i o n , e x c e p t for s m a l l a r m s ____ S i g h t i n g a n d fir e c o n t r o l e q u i p m e n t ____ O th e r o r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s ________ L u m b er a n d w o o d p ro d u cts, ex cep t _ ____________ f u r n i t u r e ____________ S a w m i ll s a n d p l a n i n g m i l l s ________ _ __ M illw o r k , p ly w o o d , and r e la t e d ____________________________ p r o d u c ts. _ W o o d e n c o n t a i n e r s _______________________ M is c e ll a n e o u s w o o d p r o d u c t s - - - ________ F u r n i t u r e a n d f ix t u r e s __________ ____________ H o u s e h o l d f u r n i t u r e _______________ _______ O ffic e f u r n i t u r e _____ _ . . . ____________ P a r t i t i o n s ; o f fic e a n d s t o r e f ix t u r e s _____ O th e r f u r n it u r e a n d f ix t u r e s ___ __ 135.79 136.18 133.35 133.40 132.93 133.18 132.62 132.99 130.42 132.00 131. 67 132. 75 134. 51 129.03 132.93 135.43 136.20 127.58 135. 36 138.88 135.79 126.98 136.85 139.40 137.78 130.82 93 .3 0 85.26 9 4 .24 8 6 .94 9 2 .06 8 4 .86 88. 51 8 2 .62 88.48 81.59 88.75 81.81 89 .4 0 82 .4 2 89. 76 8 2 .42 100.98 77 .9 0 87.34 102.18 77.71 8 7 .57 9 9 .66 76.08 87.35 97.47 7 3 .98 8 7 .14 97.06 73.62 85.90 97 .7 6 72.98 85.90 9 8 .28 75. 36 86.11 91.76 86.32 91.10 85.28 111.46 117.30 9 7 .48 88.75 83.84 108.20 113. 58 9 4 .39 89.64 84 .6 7 108.97 113.02 94.43 88.58 83.64 109.62 110.83 92.06 88.15 82.82 108. 54 110.43 9 1 .43 98. 67 133. 56 133.56 138.22 138.13 127.39 124.40 123.97 124.10 131.15 134.27 126.36 125.24 131.15 136.21 127.89 120.77 131.66 136.53 126. 05 121.51 129. 58 134.30 129.34 119.36 130. 73 134. 50 127.08 121. 93 122.31 124. 43 129.34 116. 40 91.49 84.26 90.61 84.25 91.08 8 4 .46 88.94 82.22 88 .7 3 81 .8 0 88. 54 81.81 85 .2 4 79 .6 0 98 .2 3 74. 46 86. 32 98.47 75.96 86.32 97.94 7 3 .44 8 6 .53 9 8 .94 73.93 86.32 97.16 73.10 85 .9 0 97 .9 0 73.57 85. 91 96. 51 72.92 84.67 93.11 6 8 .63 8 1 .7 9 92.02 9 0.30 86 .1 0 8 7 .96 108.11 106.68 114.36 113.42 95. 85 9 4 .08 90.73 85.88 106.75 115.87 93.68 89.24 8 4 .25 107. 63 115.75 9 2 .35 89. 04 83.42 108.50 120.22 91.38 86.51 8 0 .6 0 105.50 113. 79 91.56 86. 94 8 1 .38 105. 90 112.02 94.37 87. 98 8 2 .8 0 104.48 112. 86 9 2 .18 84.46 '79. 93 9 7 .88 105.85 8 7 .5 4 A v era g e w e e k ly h ou rs M a n u f a c t u r i n g ___________ D u r a b l e g o o d s _____ N o n d u r a b le g o o d s . O r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s _______ ________ A m m u n i t i o n , e x c e p t for s m a l l a r m s . S i g h t i n g a n d fir e c o n t r o l e q u i p m e n t . O th e r o r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s ............ L u m b e r a n d w o o d p r o d u c ts, ex c ep t f u r n i t u r e _________________________________ S a w m i l l s a n d p l a n i n g m i l l s . _____ ______ M illw o r k , p ly w o o d , and r e la t e d products________________________ W o o d e n c o n t a i n e r s _______________________ M i s c e l l a n e o u s w o o d p r o d u c t s ----------------F u r n i t u r e a n d f i x t u r e s _________________ H o u s e h o l d f u r n i t u r e _________________ O ffic e f u r n i t u r e _______________________ P a r t it io n s ; o ffic e a n d s t o r e f i x t u r e s . O th e r f u r n it u r e a n d f ix t u r e s ............ 4 1 .5 4 2 .3 4 0 .4 4 1 .5 4 2 .3 4 0 .3 4 1 .2 4 2 .2 3 9 .9 4 1 .4 4 2 .2 4 0 .2 4 1 .3 4 2 .1 4 0 .2 4 1 .2 4 2 .1 3 9 .8 4 1 .7 4 2 .6 4 0 .4 4 1 .4 4 2 .2 4 0 .3 4 1 .3 4 2 .1 4 0 .2 4 1 .0 4 1 .7 4 0 .2 4 1 .1 4 1 .7 4 0 .3 4 1 .0 4 1 .6 4 0 .2 4 1 .3 4 2 .2 4 0 .2 4 1 .2 4 2 .0 4 0 .1 40. 41. 39. 4 2 .7 4 1 .9 4 2 .2 4 1 .3 4 2 .2 4 4 .1 4 2 .1 4 1 .3 4 1 .8 4 4 .0 4 1 .8 4 1 .1 4 2 .7 4 3 .3 4 2 .2 4 1 .8 4 3 .1 4 3 .1 4 2 .7 4 2 .6 4 2 .7 4 2 .9 4 2 .9 4 2 .5 4 3 .6 4 3 .9 4 2 .4 4 2 .4 4 0 .7 4 2 .6 4 2 .4 4 2 .5 4 0 .0 4 2 .5 4 1 .9 4 1 .7 4 0 .5 4 2 .6 4 1 .9 4 2 .3 4 0 .6 4 1 .5 4 2 .2 4 2 .4 4 0 .4 4 1 .9 4 1 .8 4 2 .1 4 0 .8 4 1 .3 4 1 .9 4 1 .9 4 0 .6 4 1 .9 40. 40. 40. 40. 4 1 .1 4 0 .6 4 1 .7 4 1 .4 4 1 .1 4 0 .8 4 0 .6 4 0 .5 4 0 .4 3 9 .8 4 0 .9 4 0 .5 4 1 .2 4 0 .8 4 0 .8 4 0 .4 4 1 .4 4 1 .1 4 1 .0 4 0 .9 4 1 .4 4 1 .2 4 0 .8 4 0 .5 4 0 .7 4 0 .1 4 0 .8 4 0 .5 40. 40. 4 1 .9 4 2 .8 4 1 .2 4 2 .4 4 2 .7 4 1 .5 4 1 .7 4 1 .8 4 1 .4 4 1 .3 4 1 .1 4 1 .3 4 1 .3 4 0 .9 4 1 .1 4 1 .6 4 1 .0 4 1 .1 4 2 .0 42. 1 4 1 .6 4 1 .8 4 1 .6 4 1 .5 4 1 .9 4 2 .2 4 1 .7 4 1 .5 4 0 .8 4 1 .4 4 2 .1 4 1 .3 4 1 .5 4 1 .7 4 1 .3 4 1 .3 4 2 .2 4 1 .8 4 1 .5 4 1 .6 4 1 .2 4 1 .3 41. 39. 41. 4 1 .9 4 1 .7 4 1 .6 4 1 .2 4 3 .2 4 2 .5 4 2 .2 4 0 .9 4 0 .7 4 2 .6 4 1 .3 4 1 .4 4 1 .5 4 1 .3 4 2 .9 4 1 .4 4 1 .6 4 1 .2 4 1 .0 4 3 .5 4 1 .2 4 1 .1 4 1 .0 4 0 .8 4 2 .9 4 0 .9 4 1 .0 4 2 .6 4 2 .7 4 2 .9 4 2 .2 4 2 .6 4 2 .0 4 2 .0 4 2 .5 4 1 .7 4 2 .0 4 2 .2 4 2 .1 4 2 .7 4 2 .6 4 2 .2 4 1 .7 4 1 .5 4 3 .4 4 2 .4 4 1 .6 4 2 .0 4 1 .5 4 3 .4 4 4 .2 4 2 .5 4 1 .0 4 0 .5 4 2 .2 4 2 .3 4 2 .0 4 1 .4 4 1 .1 4 2 .7 4 1 .8 4 2 .7 4 1 .5 4 1 .4 4 2 .3 4 1 .8 4 1 .9 41. 41. 41. 40. 41. 4 2 .9 A v e r a g e h o u r l y e a r n in g s M a n u f a c t u r i n g ___________ D u r a b l e g o o d s ____ N o n d u r a b le go o d s. $ 2 .7 0 $ 2 .7 0 $ 2 .7 0 $2.68 2.86 2.86 2 .4 3 2 .4 3 2 .4 1 2 .4 0 $ 2 .6 7 2 .8 5 2 .4 0 $2.66 2 .4 4 2 .8 4 2 .4 0 $2. 65 2 .8 3 2. 39 $ 2 .6 3 2 .8 2 2 .3 8 $ 2 .6 3 2 .8 1 2 .3 8 $ 2 .5 9 2 .7 7 2 .3 6 $ 2 .6 1 2 .7 9 2 .3 6 $ 2 .6 1 2 .7 9 2 .3 5 $2. 61 2 .7 9 2 .3 6 $ 2 .5 3 2 .7 1 2 .2 9 3 .1 8 O r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s ___________________ A m m u n i t i o n , e x c e p t for s m a l l a r m s ____ 3 .2 5 S i g h t i n g a n d fir e c o n t r o l e q u i p m e n t _____________ O t h e r o r d n a n c e a n d a c c e s s o r ie s __________________ 3 .1 6 3 .2 3 3 .1 5 3 .0 2 3 .1 5 3 .2 2 3 .1 2 3 .0 0 3 .1 5 3 .2 3 3 .1 5 2 .9 8 3 .1 5 3 .2 4 3 .1 6 2 .9 6 3 .1 7 3 .2 6 3 .1 8 2 .9 6 3 .1 9 3 .2 8 3 .1 6 2 .9 8 3 .1 5 3. 26 3 .1 3 2. 91 3 .1 5 3 .2 5 3 .1 1 2 .9 2 3 .1 3 3 .2 2 3 .1 2 2 .9 4 3 .1 3 3 .2 2 3 .1 5 2 .9 1 3 .1 2 3 .2 2 3 .1 2 2 .9 0 3 .1 0 3 .1 9 3 .1 7 2 .8 9 3 .1 2 3. 21 3 .1 3 2. 91 3 .0 2 3 .0 8 3 .1 7 2 .1 8 2 .0 4 2 .1 9 2 .0 5 2 .1 7 2 .1 7 2.20 2.02 2.21 2.21 2.20 2.02 2 .0 4 2 .0 5 2 .0 6 2 .0 5 2 .1 8 2 .0 3 2 .1 8 2 .0 4 2 .1 7 2 .0 2 2 .1 1 1. 98 L u m b er a n d w o o d p ro d u cts, ex cep t f u r n i t u r e _________________________________ S a w m i l l s a n d p l a n i n g m i l l s ______________ M illw o r k , p ly w o o d , and r e la t e d p r o d u c t s _________________________________ W o o d e n c o n t a i n e r s _______________________ M i s c e l l a n e o u s w o o d p r o d u c t s - - ________ F u r n i t u r e a n d f i x t u r e s ________________ Household furniture___________ O ffic e f u r n i t u r e ______________________ P a r t it io n s ; o f fic e a n d s t o r e f ix t u r e s . O t h e r f u r n it u r e a n d f ix t u r e s _______ S e e f o o t n o t e s a t e n d o f t a b le . https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2.88 2.88 2.88 2 .2 7 2 .2 6 2.10 2.10 2 .2 4 2 .0 8 $ 2 .6 7 2.86 2 .4 1 1 .8 2 2 .4 1 1 .8 2 2 .3 9 1 .8 2 2. 36 1 .8 0 2.12 2.11 2.11 2.11 2 .3 5 1 .8 0 2 .0 9 2 .3 5 1 .7 8 2 .0 9 2 .3 4 1 .7 9 2 .0 7 2 .3 5 1 .7 9 2 .0 8 2 .3 5 1 .8 0 2 .0 7 2 .3 6 1 .8 0 2 .0 9 2 .3 5 1 .7 9 2 .0 8 2 .3 3 1 .7 7 2 .0 8 2 .3 2 1 .7 6 2 .0 7 2. 32 1 .7 7 2 .0 5 2 .2 6 1 .7 2 1 .9 9 2 .1 9 2 .0 7 2 .1 9 2 .0 7 2 .5 8 2 .7 6 2 .3 1 2 .1 7 2 .0 6 2 .5 4 2 .7 5 2 .2 8 2 .1 6 2 .0 5 2 .5 4 2 .7 3 2 .2 7 2 .1 5 2 .0 4 2 .5 2 2 .6 9 2 .2 4 2 .1 5 2 .0 3 2 .5 3 2 .7 0 2 .2 3 2 .1 6 . 06 2 .5 2 2. 71 2. 25 2 .1 5 2 .0 5 2 .5 1 2. 72 2 .2 4 2 .1 5 2 .0 4 2 .5 0 2 .7 2 2 .1 4 2 .0 3 2 .4 8 2 .7 3 2.12 2.01 2.11 2.10 1 .9 8 2 .4 8 2.12 2.00 2.22 2.22 1 .9 9 2 .5 0 2 .6 9 2 .1 8 2 .0 5 1 .9 4 2 .3 7 2 .6 2 2 .1 3 2 .3 0 2 2 .5 0 2 .7 2 2 .1 5 2.68 2.21 2. 47 2 .7 0 2 . 20 M O N T H L Y L A B O R R E V I E W , A U G U S T 1966 930 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. Annual average 1965 1966 Industry June M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. / Average weekly earnings Aug. July June 1965 1964 / M anufacturing—Continue d Durable goods—Continued 50 Stone, clay, and glass products------------- $115.87 $115.06 $114.09 $112. 56 $110.54 $110.66 $112.25 $112.94 $112.94 $112.10 $111.78 $110.83 $110.40 $109. 78 $105. 150.84 155.86 154. 51 152. 08 151. 30 146.91 155.88 152.76 154.66 145.39 147. 63 149.29 149. 60 144.14 Fiât glass _____________ __ ______ 102. 21 Glass and glassware, pressed or blown.. 113.71 112.75 109.34 111.92 110.70 111.37 111.78 109. 61 108.00 106.13 106.13 106.25 105.99 106.25 121.30 Cement, hydraulic-------------------------- 132. 61 132. 51 132. 51 130.94 126.98 129. 79 127.82 131.67 126.79 132. 29 123. 52 123. 90 122. 25 124.42 98.00 97. 76 98.00 95.87 93.61 93.66 94. 62 95.08 95.72 95.72 95.60 95.34 94. 92 94.02 89.82 Structural clay products-----------------98.80 98.00 96.87 96.62 97.11 97.69 96.48 96.32 95.36 94.16 91.96 95.76 94. 72 93.13 Pottery and related products-----------Concrete, gypsum and, plaster products. 122.04 118.99 117.13 114. 06 109.04 110. 50 114.06 115.72 118.46 117.11 119. 28 118. 04 116. 22 113.26 108. 32 Other stone and mineral products------- 115.90 116.18 115.63 113.82 113.55 111.22 113.63 113.25 113.10 111.19 111.14 109. 52 110. 56 110. 20 107.01 Primary metal industries---------------------- 140.15 139. 07 138.74 137.25 136.08 135.34 132. 48 129.83 130. 06 133.44 132. 51 135.68 135.89 133.88 130.00 Blast furnace and basic steel products. 148.75 147.33 146.56 143. 56 141. 69 140.24 134.21 130. 64 132.01 138.29 139. 67 144. 40 143.64 140. 90 138. 43 119.41 Iron and steel foundries------------------- 127.74 127.15 128.46 128.60 128.03 126.28 128.63 125.85 125.86 126.15 121.13 123.27 127.16 124.99 Non ferrous smelting and refining------- 129. 74 129. 44 129.32 126.96 125.93 125.82 126.00 125. 70 125.58 128. 78 124. 27 124. 68 124. 02 124.44 120.22 Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and ex truding_________________________ 135.39 135.83 134. 47 134.20 134.81 135. 86 134.98 131.67 131.67 133.32 130. 20 129.47 131.10 130. 07 112. 26 Nonferrous foundries----------------------- 118.30 118.44 117.74 117.17 116.75 118.15 118.40 115. 50 115. 08 112.47 111.64 110.02 113.13 113. 55 110.12 Miscellaneous primary metal indus 148.26 150. 42 146. 46 150.23 150.82 148.24 150.48 149.60 148. 72 144.86 138.60 141.53 140. 58 143.09 133. 77 tries___________________________ Average weekly hours 41.5 41.7 41.7 42.3 41.9 41.3 41.8 41.6 40.0 42.1 42.7 40.2 41.8 41.7 40.0 42.0 42.8 41.3 41.7 41.5 39.7 41.4 42.6 41.0 40.7 40.7 39.6 41.6 42.5 41.4 41.6 40.9 39.8 42.2 41.5 41.4 41.1 41.5 40.2 42.3 43.3 40.9 41.8 41.7 40.2 42.3 42.2 40.6 40.9 41.8 40.3 42.3 43.2 40.2 42.4 41.8 39.9 42.5 41.9 40.2 40.9 42.3 39.9 42.3 42.3 40.4 41.3 42.0 38.8 42.3 42.9 40.3 41.3 42.0 39.9 41.9 42.5 40.4 41.2 41.6 39.8 41.7 41.9 40.4 41.4 41.2 39.8 45.2 42.3 44.4 42.4 44.2 42.2 43.7 42.0 42.1 41.9 42.5 41.5 43.7 42.4 44.0 42.1 44.7 42.2 44.7 41.8 45.7 42.1 45.4 41.8 44.7 42.2 43.9 41.9 43.5 41.8 42.6 41.9 43.3 42.4 42.4 41.5 43.1 42.3 42.3 41.4 43.4 42.4 42.1 40.9 43.3 41.9 42.0 40.6 43.4 41.7 41.9 40.3 43.1 41.8 41.4 38.9 43.9 42.0 40.7 38.2 43.1 41.9 40.9 38.6 43.4 42.0 41.7 40.2 43.5 42.5 41.8 41.2 42.5 41.7 42.4 42.1 43.1 41.7 42.6 42.0 44.0 41.9 42.1 41.2 43.4 41.9 41.8 41.2 42.8 41.6 44.1 42.1 44.1 42.3 43.8 42.2 44.0 42.3 44.2 42.3 44.4 42.5 44.4 42.9 43.6 42.0 43.6 42.0 44.0 41.5 43.4 41.5 43.3 40.9 43.7 41.9 43.5 41.9 42.6 41.4 43.1 43.6 42.7 43.8 44.1 43.6 44.0 44.0 44.0 43.5 42.0 42.5 42.6 43.1 42.2 Stone, clay, and glass products------------Flat glass_________________________ Glass and glassware, pressed or blown _ Cement, hydraulic_________________ Structural clay products------------------Pottery and related products-----------Concrete, gypsum, and plaster prod ucts____________________________ Other stone and mineral products------- 42.6 Primary metal industries-------------------Blast furnace and basic steel products.. Iron and steel foundries------------------Nonferrous smelting and refining------Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and ex truding_________________________ Nonferrous foundries_______________ Miscellaneous primary metal indus tries____________________________ Average hourly earnings 2.74 3.18 2.35 $2.72 3.60 2.73 3.17 2.35 2.47 $2.71 3.65 2.72 3.17 2.35 2.45 $2.68 3.61 2.71 3.14 2.31 2.44 $2.67 3.57 2. 70 3.12 2.30 2.44 $2.66 3. 56 2.69 3.12 2.29 2.44 $2.66 3.54 2.70 3.11 2.28 2.43 $2.67 3.60 2.68 3.15 2.28 2.40 $2.67 3.62 2.66 3.10 2.29 2.39 $2.65 3. 58 2.64 3.12 2.29 2.39 $2.63 3.47 2.64 3.02 2.26 2.36 $2.62 3.49 2.63 3.00 2.27 2.37 $2. 61 3.48 2.63 2.96 2. 26 2. 40 $2.62 3. 52 2.63 3.02 2. 26 2.38 $2.53 3.44 2.53 2.93 2.18 2.34 2.70 2.74 2.68 2.74 2.65 2.74 2.61 2.71 2.59 2. 71 2.60 2.68 2.61 2.68 2.63 2.69 2.65 2.68 2.62 2. 66 2.61 2.64 2.60 2.62 2.60 2. 62 2.58 2.63 2.49 2.56 3.29 3.55 2.95 3.06 3.28 3.55 2.95 3.06 3.28 3.54 2.96 3.05 3.26 3.51 2.97 3.03 3.24 3.49 2.95 3.02 3.23 3.48 2.92 3.01 3.20 3. 45 2.93 3.00 3.19 3.42 2.92 3.00 3.18 3.42 2.90 2.99 3.20 3.44 2.90 3. 03 3.17 3.39 2. 85 2.98 3.20 3.43 2.86 2.99 3.19 3. 42 2.89 2.96 3.18 3.42 2.88 2.97 3.11 3.36 2. 79 2. 89 3. 07 2. 81 3.08 2.80 3.07 2. 79 3.05 2.77 3.05 2.76 3.06 2.78 3.04 2.76 3.02 2.75 3.02 2.74 3.03 2. 71 3.00 2.69 2.99 2. 69 3.00 2.70 2.99 2.71 2. 87 2. 66 3.44 3. 45 3.43 3.43 3.42 3.40 3.42 3.40 3.38 3. 33 3.30 3.33 3.30 3. 32 3.17 Stone, clay, and glass products------------Flat glass_________________________ Glass and glassware, pressed or blown. Cement, hydraulic_________________ Structural clay products-----------------Pottery and related products------------Concrete, gypsum, and plaster prod ucts________________ ___________ Other stone and mineral products------ $2.72 Primary metal industries-------------------Blast furnace and basic steel products.. Iron and steel foundries_____________ Nonferrous smelting and refining------Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and ex truding_________________________ Nonferrous foundries_______________ Miscellaneous primary metal indus tries____________________________ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis G.— E A R N IN G S A N D H O U R S T able 931 C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 Industry Ju n e 2 May 2 Apr. Annual average 1965 Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Manufacturing—Continued Average weekly earnings Durable goods—Continued Fabricated metal products........................ $120. 70 $121.84 $119. 99 $119.85 $119.06 $118. 02 $119. 71 $118.72 $118.3C $116.48 $115. 08 $114.68 $117. 02 $116. 2C $111. 34 Metal cans_______________________ 141.3S 142.46 138.14 135.36 135.14 133. 66 135.68 136.32 134.4C 133.22 140. 92 141. 36 138. 45 137. 49 131.82 Cutlery, hand tools, and general hard ware___________________________ 113.15 114. 39 113.16 113. 57 113.15 112. 47 114. 51 114.93 112.71 1 1 1 . 22 108.09 107.33 108.92 110 . 81 107. 23 Heating equipment and plumbing fix tures____________ _______________ 1 1 1 . 1 1 110. 98 108.67 108.00 108.27 105. 60 109.08 108.40 109.59 106. 53 105.06 104. 66 106. 78 105.06 102.91 Fabricated structural metal products-. 120.98 120. 27 117. 73 117. 03 116. 76 116. 48 118. 30 116.62 117.45 116. 06 115.90 113.98 115. 21 114. 26 110.27 Screw machine products, bolts, etc___ 128. 7( 128.99 127.11 128.82 127.63 126. 62 126. 34 124.32 123.20 12 1 . 21 120.01 117. 39 121. 55 121.16 113.85 Metal stampings___________________ 128. 65 133. 132. 75 131.89 129. 99 129.68 132. 4i 132.41 130.20 125.38 122.96 125. 38 09 128. 60 123. 41 Coating, engraving, and allied services. 107.44 107.10 104. 58 105.42 104.25 102.18 103. 49 103. 0( 102.58 102. 51 99.46 98.98 130. 101.22 100 . 02 Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. 110.83 111.25 108. 58 108. 52 109. 56 107. 01 108. 80 108.54 106.85 105. 75 104.00 102. 50 104.75 104.92 95.58 99.46 Miscellaneous fabricated metal prod ucts........................................................ 118.16 119.43 117.46 117.87 116.06 114. 95 114. 95 114.26 115.23 113. 42 113.15 111. 37 113. 55 113.15 108.65 Machinery__________________________ 135. 52 Engines and turbines______________ 143. 52 Farm machinery and equipment_____ Construction and related m achinery... 134. 72 Metalworking machinery and equip m ent______________________ ____ 154.58 Special industry machinery_________ 127.58 General industrial machinery.............. 135. 3S Office, computing and accounting ma chines__________________________ 131.44 Service industry machines.................... 116. 20 Miscellaneous machinery_____ ______ 127.87 135.83 145. 73 131.94 133.24 134.03 144.86 131. 52 :i32. 50 134. 51 141.57 132.62 133.42 133. 76 138.32 130.11 131.94 132. 41 135.85 128. 59 129.73 133. 48 140. 71 127.14 131. 24 130.20 129.47 135. 76 136. 08 125.22 123.79 128.40 . 130.33 127.12 135.43 122. 30 126. 65 155.90 153.12 153.64 152.06 150.29 151. 45 146.19 144.00 140. 75 126. 72 124. 55 125.24 124.80 124. 24 126. 05 122. 64 121.52 120. 37 134.64 132.24 132.54 132. 71 131.67 132. 88 129.60 129.17 127. 41 131. 02 128. 52 132.13 132.62 133.06 133. 24 130.42 129.38 126.60 115.93 115. 79 115.92 115.51 113.44 114. 93 113.3C 112.61 109. 62 128.32 127.30 127.87 127.43 125.97 126. 66 124.36 123.36 119.56 124.95 132. 57 117. 56 124.66 125.83 131. 43 118. 26 125. 97 128.03 133. 76 120.18 126. 56 127.15 133. 44 121.30 125. 97 121. 69 127.30 118. 82 120. 25 139.10 141. 75 145.33 144. 05 137.06 117. 85 118.28 120. 77 120 . 22 114.86 125.83 124.82 127. 74 126. 56 120.83 123.85 126.95 126. 35 126. 78 120.60 110.15 111. 78 115. 06 112.19 107.16 119.11 119. 66 120. 93 120.93 115.83 Average weekly hours Fabricated metal products..................... Metal cans.............................................. . Cutlery, hand tools, and general hard ware__________________________ _ Heating equipment and plumbing fix tures..................................................... . Fabricated structural metal products.. Screw machine products, bolts, etc___ Metal stampings........... ........................ Coating, engraving, and allied services Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. Miscellaneous fabricated metal products Machinery____ _______ ____ _________ Engines and turbines______________ Farm machinery and equipment_____ Construction and related m achinery.... Metalworking machinery and equip m ent___________________________ Special industry machinery_________ General industrial machinery________ Office, computing and accounting ma chines__________________________ Service industry machines..................... Miscellaneous machinery........................ 42.5 43. 5 42.6 43.7 42.1 42.9 42.2 42.3 42.2 42.1 42.0 41.9 42.6 42.8 42.4 42.6 42.4 42.0 41.9 41.5 42.0 43.9 41.7 43.9 42.4 43.4 42.1 43.1 41.7 42.8 41.6 41.9 41.3 41.6 41.6 41.5 42.1 42.1 41.9 41.5 41.1 40.5 41.1 41.5 41.4 40.7 42.6 45.0 42.6 42.3 42.3 42.2 40.8 42.2 45.1 43.4 42.0 42.3 42.5 40.1 41.6 44.6 43.1 41.5 41.6 42.1 40.0 41.5 45.2 43.1 42.0 41.9 42.4 40.1 41.7 45.1 42.9 41.7 42.3 41.9 39.7 41.6 44.9 42.8 41.2 41.8 41.8 40.7 42.4 44.8 43.7 41.9 42.5 41.8 40.6 42.1 44.4 43.7 41.7 42.4 41.7 41.2 42.4 44.0 43.4 41.7 41.9 41.9 40.2 41.9 43.6 42.5 41.5 41.8 41.7 40.1 42.3 43.8 42.4 41.1 41.6 41.6 40.1 41.6 43.0 42.5 40.9 41.0 41.4 40.6 42.2 44.2 43.8 42.0 41.9 41.9 40.1 41.7 43.9 43.3 41.5 41.8 41. 6 40.2 41.3 42.8 43.0 41.2 41.1 41.0 44.0 43.1 43.8 43.5 42.7 43.3 44.1 42.9 43.2 43.6 44.0 42.3 42.8 43.4 43.7 41.8 42.3 43.1 44.2 42.9 42.1 43.6 43.4 41.9 41.6 42.8 43.3 42.0 41 4 43.3 42.8 41.8 41 fi 42.5 42.5 41.3 40 ^4 42.4 42.8 41.2 42.4 40.8 42! 7 43.4 41.8 41 3 42 ! 9 43.1 41.7 43.6 44.1 43.5 42.7 43.4 42! 7 4li 9 46.7 44.3 44.1 47.1 44.0 44.0 46.4 43.7 43.5 46.7 44.1 43.6 46.5 44.1 43.8 46.1 43.9 43.6 46.6 44.7 44.0 45.4 43.8 43.2 45.0 43.4 43.2 44.4 43.3 42.9 44.3 42.7 42.8 45.0 42.7 42.6 4 5 .7 43.6 43 .3 45.3 43.4 42.9 44.5 42.7 42.1 42.4 41.8 44.4 42.4 41.7 44.4 42.0 41.8 44.2 42.9 42.0 44.4 43.2 41.7 44.4 43.2 41.4 44.2 43.4 42.1 44.6 42.9 41.5 44.1 42.7 41.4 43.9 42.2 40.6 42.7 41.7 41.1 43.0 42.6 41.4 43.2 42.4 42.3 43.5 42.4 41.4 43.5 41.3 40.9 42.9 $2.78 3.21 $2.74 3. 21 $2. 75 3.22 $2.76 3.18 $2.76 3.19 $2. 67 3.08 Average hourly earnings Fabricated metal products........................ Metal cans_____________ ___________ Cutlery, hand tools, and general hard ware___________________________ Heating equipment and plumbing fix tures..... ................................................. Fabricated structural metal products... Screw machine products, bolts, etc....... Metal stampings___________________ Coating, engraving, and allied services. Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. Miscellaneous fabricated metal products. $2.84 3. 25 $2.86 3. 26 $2.85 3.22 2.72 2.73 2.74 2.73 2.72 2.73 2.84 2.86 3.02 2.54 2.62 2.80 2. 72 2.85 2.86 3. 07 2.55 2.63 2.81 2.71 2.83 2.85 3.08 2.52 2. 61 2. 79 2.70 2.82 2.85 3.06 2.51 2.59 2.78 2.70 2.80 2.83 3.03 2. 50 2.59 2.77 Machinery__________________________ Engines and tu rb in e s.......................... Farm machinery and equipment_____ Construction and related m achinery... Metalworking machinery and equipment. Special industry machinery____ ____ General industrial machinery________ Office, computing and accounting ma chines__________________________ Service industry machines..................... Miscellaneous machinery....................... 3.08 3.33 3.09 3. 31 2.88 3.07 3.08 3. 35 3.09 3. 07 3.31 2.88 3.06 3.06 3.33 3.08 3. 06 3.30 2.85 3.04 3.05 3.30 3.07 3.06 3.29 2.84 3. 04 3.04 3.27 3.04 3.04 3.27 2.83 3.03 3.10 2.78 2.88 3.09 2.78 2.89 3.06 2.77 2.88 3.08 2.76 2.88 3.07 2.77 2.87 See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis $2.84 3.20 $2.82 3.21 $2.81 3.19 $2. 81 3.17 $2.80 3.20 $2. 79 3.20 2. 71 2. 72 2.73 2.69 2.68 2.63 2.65 2. 67 2. 67 2.59 2.66 2. 80 2. 82 3.03 2. 48 2. 56 2. 75 2.68 2. 79 2.82 3. 03 2. 47 2. 56 2. 75 2.67 2.77 2.80 3.03 2.47 2.56 2.74 2.66 2.77 2.80 3.00 2.46 2.55 2.75 2. 65 2. 77 2.78 2.95 2. 47 2.53 2.72 2.62 2.74 2. 74 2.90 2. 42 2.50 2. 72 2.61 2.74 2.73 2.95 2.42 2.50 2.69 2.61 2.73 2.75 2.99 2.39 2.50 2. 75 2.62 2. 74 2.76 2.97 2. 41 2. 51 2. 72 2.56 2.67 2. 66 2.87 2.32 2.42 2.65 3.03 3. 25 3.04 3. 01 3. 26 2.83 3. 02 3.02 3.28 3.02 3. 01 3. 25 2. 82 3.02 3.00 3.24 3.01 3.00 3.22 2.80 3.00 2.99 3.24 2.99 3. 01 3.20 2.80 2.99 2.97 3.24 2.94 2.98 3.17 2.78 2. 97 2.94 3.21 2.91 2.94 3.14 2.76 2.94 2.94 3.19 2.92 2.95 3.15 2.77 2.93 2.95 3.18 2.91 2.93 3.19 2.77 2.93 2. 95 3. 20 2. 93 2. 95 3.18 2. 77 2. 95 2.87 3.12 2.87 2.87 3.08 2.69 2.87 3.08 2. 74 2.85 3.07 2. 73 2. 84 3.04 2.73 2.82 3.03 2. 72 2.81 3.00 2.70 2.80 2.97 2.68 2.77 2.98 2.70 2.77 2.97 2. 71 2.79 2.99 2. 71 2. 78 2.92 2.62 2. 70 M O N T H L Y L A B O R R E V IE W , A U G U S T 1966 932 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. Annual average 1955 1966 Industry June2 May 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Dec. Jan. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Manufacturing—Continued Durable goods—Continued Electrical equipment and supplies-------Electric distribution equipm ent--------Electrical industrial apparatus---------Household appliances---------------------Electric lighting and wiring equip ment ___________________________ Radio and TV receiving sets..............— Communication equipm ent--------Electronic components and accessories. Miscellaneous electrical equipment and supplies____________________ 78 $101.66 $108.62 $108.62 $108. 09 $107.79 $108.47 $108.21 $110.04 $108.32 $107.12 $106.08 $104. 60 $103.97 $106. 04 $105. 113.02 110.83 115.35 115.35 113.98 115. 50 113. 57 113.98 116. 75 115.23 114.68 113.58 113. 44 113.85 113. 71 113. 70 109. 56 115.48 117 73 118.28 118.15 118.71 118.00 115.78 117. 58 114.81 114.68 113. 98 112.19 113. 70 119.39 120.10 119.39 114.77 118.69 119.83 123. 26 119. 70 119.28 115. 34 113.83 111.60 113. 98 114. 95 107.33 99.14 95. 04 102.66 102. 50 101.09 101.43 100. 78 100. 28 102. 42 101. 68 101.27 100. 37 98.01 97.93 99. 31 90. 87. 47 92 23 89.93 91.80 91.87 93.43 92.66 95. 24 93. 50 93.03 92. 50 91.43 89.67 89.27 116. 91 88 112. 07 117.58 113. 65 117.29 118. 53 119.26 122.98 120.25 121. 54 121.67 120. 67 119.81 121.22 119.23 86.18 92.80 92.84 91.98 92.43 92.25 92.03 92. 51 91.21 89.91 88. 62 87. 34 86. 24 91. 02 89.28 Transportation equipment— ------------Motor vehicles and equipm ent---------Aircraft and parts-------------------------Ship and boat building and repairing. Railroad equipm ent-----------------------Other transportation equipm ent-------- 117.67 117.67 117.62 117.10 119.81 118.12 120.98 119. 28 138 42 138.74 141. 47 140. 06 141.14 142.46 145. 53 144.87 141. 54 149.02 144.57 146.45 148. 58 155.38 156.18 143.12 142.68 139. 43 141. 48 142.14 143. 00 141.15 138. 35 131 88 129.17 128.75 130.10 130. 00 129.27 126. 07 123. 22 137.20 138.20 132.44 133.82 135. 71 135. 96 133. 32 97.36 95.60 95.60 91.80 89.86 94. 87 94.13 116.06 112. 74 111.38 110.95 113. 70 114. 95 108.67 141.48 151. 53 134. 51 125.86 129.03 97.11 135. 01 142.13 130. 73 123. 32 130. 25 97.58 130.82 136. 45 130. 52 120. 50 125.19 96. 05 133. 46 141.14 130. 31 119. 50 126. 72 90.68 137.49 137. 71 147. 74 147. 63 131. 04 131. 88 120. 60 121. 91 130. 33 129. 44 95. 63 93.09 130.09 138. 03 125. 03 121.10 127. 39 93.89 Average weekly hours Electrical equipment and supplies-------Electric distribution equipm ent--------Electrical industrial apparatus---------Household appliances---------------------Electric lighting and wiring equip ment ___________________________ Radio and TV receiving sets........ ........ Communication equipm ent--------Electronic components and accessories. Miscellaneous electrical equipment and supplies________________________ Transportation equipm ent.......... ........... Motor vehicles and equipm ent-......... Aircraft and parts_________________ Ship and boat building and repairing. Railroad equipm ent_______________ Other transportation equipm ent____ 41.3 42.1 42.5 41.6 41.3 42.1 42.7 41.7 41.1 41.6 42.5 41.6 41.3 42.0 42.7 40.7 41.4 41.6 42.6 41.5 41.3 41.6 42.1 41.9 42.0 42.3 42.6 42.8 41.5 41.9 41.9 42.0 41.2 41.7 41.7 42.0 40.8 41.3 41.6 40.9 40.7 41.4 41.4 40.8 40.3 41.4 41.8 40.0 41.1 41.5 42.3 41.0 41.0 41.4 41.8 41.2 40. 5 41.2 41.5 40.5 40.9 40.1 41.6 40.7 41.0 39.1 41.8 40.9 40.6 39.4 41.4 40.7 40.9 39.6 41.9 40.9 40.8 40.1 42.1 41.0 40.6 39.6 42.2 40.9 41.3 40.7 42.7 41.3 41.0 40.3 41.9 40.9 41.0 40.1 41.7 40.5 40.8 39.7 41.3 40.1 40. 5 40.1 41.3 39.7 40.3 39.5 40.3 39.2 40.7 39.5 41.4 41.0 40.8 39.7 41.3 40.4 40.1 39.4 40.9 39.9 41.0 41.0 40.7 40.8 41.6 41.3 42.3 42.0 41.6 40.7 40.5 40.2 40.9 41.2 40.7 43.0 43.7 42.9 41.4 41.5 40.0 42.7 42.9 43.4 41.7 40.5 40.0 42.9 43.2 43.6 41.4 40.8 38.9 43.3 43.7 44.0 41.3 41.0 38.9 44.1 45.3 43.7 40.8 41.2 40.2 43.9 45.4 43.1 40.4 40.4 40.4 43.4 44.7 42.3 41.4 39.7 41.5 41.8 42.3 41.5 40.7 40.2 41.7 41.4 41.6 41.7 40.3 39. 0 41.4 42.1 42.9 41.9 40.1 39. 6 39.6 43.1 44.5 42.0 40.2 40.6 41.4 42.9 44.2 42.0 40.5 40.2 40.3 42.1 43. 0 41.4 40.5 40.7 41.0 $2.60 2.75 2.75 2.84 2.47 2.32 2.86 2.22 $2.60 2. 75 2.74 2.82 2. 46 2. 33 2. 87 2. 21 $2.57 2.74 2. 71 2.79 2. 42 2.28 2.84 2. 20 $2.58 2. 75 2. 72 2. 79 2. 43 2. 27 2.82 2. 20 $2. 58 2. 74 2. 73 2.78 2. 44 2. 26 2.84 2. 22 $2.58 2. 73 2. 72 2. 79 2. 43 2. 29 2.83 2. 21 $2. 51 2.69 2. 64 2.65 2.37 42.2 43.5 42.0 42.3 42.0 43.5 41.4 41.2 40.4 Average hourly earnings 2.28 $2.63 2.74 2.77 2.88 2. 50 2.30 2.90 2.27 $2.63 2.74 2.78 2.87 2.49 2.33 2.88 2.26 $2.61 2.75 2.78 2.82 2.48 2.32 2.88 2.26 $2.62 2.73 2.77 2.86 2.47 2.33 2.89 2.25 $2.02 2.74 2.75 2.86 2.47 2.34 2.88 2. 25 $2. 62 2. 76 2.76 2.88 2. 48 2.34 2. 88 2. 24 $2. 61 2.75 2. 74 2. 85 2.48 2. 32 2.87 2.23 2.87 2.87 2.89 2.87 2.88 2.86 2.86 2. 84 2.79 2.77 2.75 2.76 2.78 2.79 2.67 3.30 3. 43 3.23 3. 09 3. 30 2.36 3.30 3. 44 3. 21 3. 05 3. 30 2.33 3.26 3.39 3.18 3.04 3.25 2.34 3. 23 3. 36 3.15 3. 03 3. 24 2. 34 3.16 3.28 3.13 2.99 3. 21 2. 32 3.17 3.29 3.11 2.98 3. 20 2. 29 3.19 3.32 3.12 3. 00 3. 21 2. 31 3. 21 3.34 3.14 3. ul 3. 22 2. 31 3.09 3. 21 3.02 2. 99 3.13 2.29 Electrical equipment and supplies-------Electric distribution equipm ent......... Electrical industrial apparatus---------Household appliances______________ Electric lighting and wiring equipment Radio and TV receiving sets________ Communication equipm ent-------------Electronic components and accessories. $2.63 2.74 2.77 2.87 2.51 2.30 supplies----- ---------- --------------------- Miscellaneous electrical equipment and Transportation equipm ent----------------Motor vehicles and equipm ent--------Aircraft and parts_________________ Ship and boat building and repairing. Railroad equipm ent_______________ Other transportation equipm ent____ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2.88 3.28 3.29 3.28 3.37 3.28 3.12 3.33 2. 41 3.29 3. 41 3.25 3.11 3.33 2.39 3.28 3.37 3.26 3.12 3.27 2.39 3.29 3.39 3.26 3.14 3.28 2.36 3.29 3.40 3.25 3.13 3.31 2.31 2.22 2. 74 2.16 933 C.— E A R N IN G S A N D H O U R S T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Annual average Industry June 2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings M anufacturing—C ontinued Durable goods—Continued Instruments and related products______ $114. 21 $114. 06 $112. 02 $112.67 $112.25 $111.72 $111.30 $110.88 $109. 78 $108. 58 $108.05 Engineering and scientific instruments. 130. 78 129. 55 133.18 131. 70 132. 25 133. 80 129.13 124. 80 125.10 125.63 Mechanical measuring and control devices_________________________ 116. 84 116. 57 114.36 113. 79 114.06 114. 06 109.06 111.34 110.92 109.93 109.15 Optical and ophthalmic goods _ . . . 104. 37 102.12 96.87 101. 46 100.38 99.42 100. 44 99.83 98.70 99.12 97.86 Ophthalmic goods _________ 92. 51 88. 26 91.24 91.05 89.35 90.23 89.84 89.40 89.84 87.76 Surgical, medical, and dental equipment___________________________ 97.11 95.58 93. 79 93.89 92.57 93.20 94. 30 93.43 91.94 90.80 89.95 Photographic equipment and supplies.. 134. 20 134.60 131. 63 133.29 130 29 131 97 129 63 131 26 127 87 126 24 Watches and clocks . . __________ _ 89.91 90. 50 91. 62 91 02 89 3f> 91 27 89 76 87 33 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries.. 88.40 88.40 87. 74 88.88 88.44 Jewelry, silverware, and plated ware—. 100.94 100. 28 100. 21 100. 60 97. 68 Toys, amusement, and sporting goods. 78.20 78.20 78.99 78. 00 Pens’ pencils, office and "art m aterials.. 86.05 84.42 85. 44 84 80 Costume jewelry, buttons, and notions. 81.80 79.97 82.42 82.21 Other manufacturing industries.._____ 94. 64 95. 51 94.56 95.47 95.47 Musical instruments and parts_____ 99.14 98.25 99.53 102.18 87.12 87.48 86.46 86.46 96. 63 103. 39 102.67 100.14 77 00 76 05 76 62 82 29 8f> 70 8fi 49 86 49 80.38 80. 80 78. ÓÌ 77.03 94.24 94. 60 94.19 94.60 96.80 99. 77 101.22 101.22 $107. 53 $108.99 $108. 05 $103. 63 124. 42 127.26 124. 92 119.66 109.41 109.41 108. 62 103. 79 98.88 98.41 98.23 94.81 89.60 88. 56 88.99 85.67 87.58 91.30 124 Q6 127 87 90.63 88.22 85.20 97.06 76 24 84 46 77.62 92.23 99.29 84.80 94.53 76 86 88 84 77.81 92.69 97.58 83. 71 90.91 76 66 8116 7ö! 85 91.94 93.85 84.96 94.19 84.99 95.53 88 68 76! 44 91.83 95.99 82.37 91.58 74 30 77. 62 92.23 97. 34 73.90 88.98 94.66 Average weekly hours Instruments and related products............ Engineering and scientific instruments. Mechanical measuring and control devices______ _______________ _. Optical and ophthalmic goods_______ Ophthalmic goods____. . . _ _____ Surgical, medical, and dental equipm ent___________ . . . . _______ Photographic equipment and supplies. Watches and clocks___ _ . . . ___ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries.. Jewelry, silverware, and plated ware—. Toys, amusement, and sporting goods. Pens, pencils, office and art materials. Costume jewelry, buttons, and notions. Other manufacturing industries______ Musical instruments and p a r ts ____ 42.3 42.4 42.6 41.8 42.2 42.2 43.1 42.2 42.9 42.0 42.8 42.0 43.3 42.0 42.2 41.9 41.6 41.6 41.7 41.4 41.6 41.2 41.2 41.6 42.0 41.4 41. 5 40.8 40.7 42.8 42.6 42.7 42.2 41.3 42.2 40.7 40. 3 42.3 42.1 41.1 42.4 42.0 41 2 42.4 41.6 40.8 41.0 42.2 41.2 41.7 42.3 41.4 41.7 42.0 41.2 41.8 42.0 41.4 41.5 42.0 41.2 41.6 41.9 41.1 41.6 41.7 41.0 41.3 41.8 41.2 40.7 41.4 40.6 41.5 41.2 44.0 40. 5 40.6 43.7 40. 4 41.0 43.3 40 9 40.6 43.7 41 0 40.7 43.0 40 8 41.0 43.7 40.8 43.5 40.5 43.9 40.0 43.2 39.8 42.6 39.1 42.5 40.4 43.2 40.1 43.0 40.1 41.8 40.0 41.2 40.0 41.1 39.1 40.4 40.1 40.3 40.8 39.7 40.9 39.1 40. 2 39.2 39.9 40.6 40.4 41.4 39.3 40.3 40.4 40.8 41.3 40.2 40.7 39.0 40.0 40.3 40.8 42.4 39.6 40.6 38.5 39.0 39.4 40.1 40.5 40.5 42.9 39.2 41. 6 40.4 40.6 41.4 40.4 42.6 39.7 41.3 39.6 40.6 42.0 40.4 41.9 40.1 41.3 39.3 40.6 42.0 40.0 41.3 39.5 40.8 39.6 40.1 41.2 40.0 41.1 39.3 40.7 39.9 40.3 41.0 39.3 39.7 38.6 39.4 39.3 39.8 39.6 39.7 40.6 39.1 40.4 39.0 40.1 40.5 39.9 41.0 39. 2 40. 4 39.6 40.1 40.9 39.6 40.7 38.9 39.4 39.1 39.9 40.8 40.1 Average hourly earnings Instruments and related products______ Engineering and scientific instruments. Mechanical measuring and control devices______ __ _______ _____ Optical and ophthalmic goods_____ Ophthalmic goods_________ Surgical, medical, and dental equipment___________________________ Photographic equipment and supplies. Watches and clocks.. . ______ $2. 70 $2.69 3. 07 $2. 68 3. 07 $2.67 3. 09 $2. 66 3.07 $2. 66 3.09 $2. 65 3. 09 $2.64 3.06 $2.62 3.00 $2. 61 3.00 $2. 61 3.02 $2.61 3.02 $2.62 3.03 $2. 61 3. 01 $2.54 2. 94 2.73 2.45 2. 73 2. 42 2. 24 2. 71 2. 38 2.19 2. 69 2.41 2.22 2.69 2.39 2 21 2.69 2.39 2.19 2. 66 2. 38 2.19 2.67 2.36 2.17 2.66 2.35 2.17 2.63 2.36 2.17 2.63 2.33 2.13 2.63 2.36 2.18 2.63 2. 36 2.16 2.63 2. 35 2.16 2. 55 2.29 2.11 2. 34 2.32 3.05 2. 22 2.31 3.08 2. 24 2.29 3.04 2 24 2.28 3.05 2 22 2.29 3.03 2 19 2. 30 3.02 2.29 2.98 2.27 2.99 2. 27 2. 96 2.26 2. 94 2.24 2.94 2.26 2.96 2. 26 2. 98 2.20 2.88 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries.. Jewelry, silverware, and plated ware.. Toys, amusement, and sporting goods. Pens, pencils, office and art materials _ Costume jewelry, buttons, and notions. Other manufacturing industries____ _ Musical instruments and parts_____ 2.21 2.45 2. 21 2. 44 2.00 2.13 2. 04 2.37 2.43 2.21 2.45 2.00 2.10 2.04 2.37 2.42 2.20 2.43 2.01 2.12 2. 04 2.34 2.41 2.20 2.40 2.00 2 12 2.04 2.34 2.41 2. 20 2.38 2.00 2 11 2.04 2.35 2.39 2.16 2. 41 1.94 2 06 2. 00 2.33 2.41 2.14 2.41 1.93 2 07 1.97 2.32 2.41 2.14 2.39 1.93 2.13 2.35 1.93 2.12 2.30 1.93 2.13 2.29 1.96 2. 13 2.33 1.94 2.08 2. 25 1.91 1.96 2.33 2.41 1.96 2.30 2.41 1.95 2.30 2.38 1.93 2.31 2.37 2.14 2.32 1.96 2 07 l! 96 2.29 2.37 1.96 2. 30 2. 38 1.89 2.23 2.32 See footnotes at end of table. 224 -96 6 O— 66- •7 https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2. 36 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 934 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 b y industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. Annual average 1965 1966 Industry Ju n e2 M a y 2 Apr. M anufacturing—Continued Nondurable goods Food and kindred products----------------Meat products_____________ ______ Dairy products-----------------------------Canned and preserved food, except meats________________ ____ _____ Grain mill products________________ Bakery products___________________ Sugar____________________________ Confectionery and related products___ Beverages_________________ _______ Miscellaneous food and kindred prod ucts____________________________ Tobacco manufactures________________ Cigarettes________________________ Cigars____________________________ Textile mill products........ ............. ........... Cotton broad woven fabrics_________ Silk and synthetic broad woven fabrics. Weaving and finishing broad woolens-Narrow fabrics and small wares_______ Knitting_________________________ Finishing textiles, except wool and k nit____________________________ Floor covering_____________________ Yam and thread___________________ Miscellaneous textile goods__________ Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings $105.16 $103. 48 $102. 21 $101.25 $101. 59 $100.94 $101.84 $100. 77 $100.19 $100.19 $99.19 $100.98 $100. 53 $99.87 $97.17 111.22 108. 40 106. 27 105. 73 106.00 108.94 109. 03 109.82 108.05 110.46 105.63 108.94 107.38 107.27 105. 98 110.00 107. 94 107. 52 106.85 106. 59 106.59 106.68 105. 59 105.59 106.60 104. 48 106. 70 105.90 105.08 102.12 84.28 83. 33 81.30 82.80 79.36 79.58 77.42 80.20 80. 59 81.41 79.37 77.00 79.00 75.86 117. 26 115.00 113. 97 114.84 115.88 115.54 119. 21 116.15 117.76 118. 78 116.46 115.82 112. 75 113.85 109.07 105.67 104.09 102. 26 101.35 101.85 101.20 102. 36 102.77 104.39 102. 06 101.50 102.00 102. 66 101. 00 97.12 121.54 117. 83 119.97 117.07 105.73 109.04 106.00 97.14 120.28 121.24 122.54 116.89 110. 50 106.32 90.27 87.25 84. 75 86.18 84.89 84.50 84.80 83.53 85.20 87. 74 87.08 82.78 83.03 83. 53 80.38 120.83 116.93 117.33 114. 97 113.60 112.75 116.28 116.52 114. 62 114.09 114.12 116. 90 116.34 113. 68 109.89 102.97 101. 64 100. 08 99.54 89. 86 87.32 86. 87 84.80 103. 45 105. 57 . 102.80 66. 33 65.28 66.15 82.94 81.45 79. 90 81.22 86. 00 83. 57 82. 64 84.15 87. 67 87. 71 85.14 86.68 91.12 89. 96 87. 03 87.23 80.64 79. 07 78. 47 79. 52 73.08 72.31 68. 63 70.98 101.44 99.17 88.31 82.30 111.25 101.38 66.15 64.05 81.22 79.84 84.97 84.39 86.24 84.83 87.44 85.80 79.10 77.38 69. 69 68.02 100.42 101.12 83.07 80.35 103.09 100.73 64.90 67.30 80.79 80.79 83. 57 83.96 86.63 86.24 85.80 83.38 79.48 77.56 68.71 70.53 99. 56 77.62 97.99 66.13 79.99 83.18 85.22 83. 78 77.19 70.31 99.92 78.41 96.10 65.11 78.62 81.60 85.06 84.58 75.85 69.42 98.75 78.07 97.38 65.32 79.19 81.60 85.61 85.34 75. 85 69.92 98. 75 82.72 98.02 63.92 77.64 79.80 83. 76 85.34 74.48 68.29 98.09 83.16 98.80 64.60 77.52 78.38 83.60 84.00 74. 80 69.17 98.37 79.59 97.27 63.95 77. 98 80. 28 83. 90 83. 69 75. 99 68. 29 96.25 76.05 93.45 64.24 73.39 74.34 79.24 76.86 73.03 65.45 89.63 85.31 76.46 91.59 87.74 83.96 76.11 90.95 85.68 84. 78 74.87 89. 25 86.09 86.14 75. 68 87.36 84.04 80.60 74.12 85.90 86.60 80. 75 72.42 88.83 85. 85 81. 51 73. 70 88. 20 81.90 76. 44 66.99 83. 63 90.25 88.58 76.46 93.52 78.14 95.03 91.33 82. 32 76. 50 93. 96 91. 54 79.95 76. 50 91.16 91.94 81.60 76. 79 91.38 90.87 82.22 76. 72 92.02 87.96 81.25 76.72 90.74 41.4 41. 5 42.8 40.9 40.6 42. 0 40. 4 40.1 42.0 40.5 39.6 41.9 40.8 40.0 41.8 40.7 40.8 41.8 41.4 41.3 42.0 41.3 41.6 41.9 41.4 41.4 41.9 41.4 42.0 42.3 41.5 41.1 42.3 41.9 41.9 43.2 41.2 41.3 42.7 41.1 41.1 42. 2 41.0 41.4 42.2 39.2 44.4 40. 5 42.2 39.3 40.6 38.4 43. 5 40. 1 41. 2 38. 7 40.6 38.9 44.0 39.9 43.0 39.9 40.2 40.0 44.4 40. 1 43.2 39.3 40.0 38.9 44.1 40.0 41.3 39.3 39.7 39.2 45.5 40.3 46.4 40.0 40.8 39.7 44.5 40.3 45.3 39.4 40.6 40.3 46.0 41.1 38.7 40.0 40.5 39.7 46.4 40.5 42.5 41.0 40.6 40.5 46.4 40.6 43.3 40. 5 41.2 40.7 46.7 40.8 43.3 38. 5 41.9 38.5 45.1 40.9 42.2 38.8 41.7 39.5 45. 0 40.4 42. 5 39.4 40.6 38.9 44.7 40.3 42. 7 39.4 40.4 42.0 38.3 38.6 37.9 42. 2 43.3 44.3 44.1 41.4 39.3 43.7 42.0 42. 5 43.3 41.7 38.1 39. 1 37.3 41. 4 42. 6 43. 0 43. 3 41.3 37. 5 43.8 41. 0 42. 5 42.6 42.0 38.2 38.5 37.8 42.3 43.6 44.0 43.4 42.3 39.0 44.2 42.5 42.9 42.9 42.8 39.6 40.9 37.8 42.3 43.8 44.0 43.5 42.3 38.5 43.9 42.6 43.1 43.0 42.2 38.1 38.4 36.6 41.8 43.5 43.5 42.9 41.6 38.0 42.7 42.1 43.1 42.6 43.1 39.0 38.9 37.3 42.3 43.3 44.2 42.9 42.5 38.6 43.6 44.4 43.2 43.7 43.4 37.9 38.3 38.9 42.3 43.5 44.0 41.9 41.7 39.4 43.3 44.2 43.2 43.0 43.1 39.2 37.4 38.9 42.1 43.1 43.7 42.1 41.5 39.5 42.8 43.5 43.0 42.9 42.7 39.4 36.4 38.3 41.6 42.5 43.4 42.5 41.0 39.0 42.0 43.7 42.3 42.3 42.2 37.9 37.6 38.2 41.9 42.5 43.9 43.1 41.0 39.5 42.2 44.4 43.0 41.8 42.2 37.6 37.7 37.6 41.3 42.0 43.4 43.1 40.7 38.8 41.4 42.2 42.6 41.1 42.1 37.8 38.0 38.0 41.9 42.6 44.0 43.3 41.1 39.3 43.3 42.5 42. 6 42. 5 42.4 37.9 37.7 37.4 41.7 42.7 43. 7 42. 7 41.3 38.8 42. 5 42. 9 42. 6 42. 2 42.4 38.8 39.1 38. 7 41.0 42.0 43.3 41.1 40.8 38. 5 42.0 42.0 41.1 41.4 $2.43 2.61 2.49 $2.37 2.56 2.42 2.00 1.95 2.44 2.41 2.49 2.04 2.72 92. 02 Average weekly hours Food and kindred products___________ Meat products_________________ ___ Dairy products____________________ Canned and preserved food, except meats---------------------------------------Grain mill products________________ Bakery products___________________ Sugar------------------------------------------Confectionery and related products----Beverages_____________1 ---------------Miscellaneous food and kindred prod ucts----- ------ --------------- ----------Tobacco manufactures_______________ Cigarettes________________________ Cigars___________________________ Textile mill products_________________ Cotton broad woven fabrics_________ Silk and synthetic broad woven fabrics. Weaving and finishing broad woolens.. Narrow fabrics and small wares______ Knitting_________________________ Finishing textiles, except wool and knit. Floor covering_____________________ Yam and thread___________________ Miscellaneous textile goods___ ______ 45.1 40.8 40. 3 42.1 42.2 38.9 42.1 43. 0 43. 4 43. 6 42. 0 39. 5 43 2 42. 7 43.0 Average hourly earnings Food and kindred products___________ Meat products________________ ____ Dairy products____________________ Canned and preserved food, except meats__________________________ Grain mill products________________ Bakery products___________________ Sugar____________________________ Confectionery and related products___ Beverages________________________ Miscellaneous food and kindred prod ucts____________________________ Tobacco manufactures_______________ Cigarettes________________________ Cigars___________________________ Textile mill products_____________ ___ Cotton broad woven fabrics_________ Silk and synthetic broad woven fabrics. Weaving and finishing broad woolens.. Narrow fabrics and smallwares_______ Knitting_________________________ Finishing textiles, except wool and knit. Floor covering_____________________ Yam and thread___________________ Miscellaneous textile goods___ ______ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis $2. 54 2.68 2. 57 2. 60 2. 59 2. 24 2. 87 2. 44 2.31 1. 97 2. 00 2. 02 2. 09 1.92 1 85 2.13 1.83 2.21 $2.46 2.64 2.54 $2.44 2.64 2.52 $2.42 2. 61 2.52 $2.42 2.63 2.52 $2.39 2.57 2.47 $2.41 2.60 2.47 $2.44 2.60 2.48 2.03 2.87 2.03 2.56 2.52 2.83 2.14 2.81 1.95 2.48 2. 50 2.83 2.15 2.79 2.00 2. 50 2.85 1.99 2.56 2.54 2.51 2.13 2.83 2.01 2.54 2. 35 1.95 2.61 2.55 2.34 2.35 2.16 2.64 1.75 1.91 1.94 1.95 2. 33 2.13 2.65 1.74 1.91 1.93 1.96 2.33 2. 32 2.60 1.70 1.71 2.07 1.93 1.77 2.13 1 1.78 2.05 1.93 1.77 2.12 2.60 1.70 1.85 1.84 1. 90 1.94 1.82 1.76 2. 58 1.71 1.87 1.78 2.07 1.95 1.77 2.14 2.34 2.06 2. 59 1.71 1.89 1.92 1.95 1.98 1.85 1.77 2.04 1.94 1.76 2.09 2.33 1.79 2.06 1.93 1.78 2.13 2.34 1.99 2.64 1.70 1.89 1.92 1.96 1.99 1.85 1.78 2.04 1.94 1.77 2.34 2.63 1.73 1.91 1.92 1.96 1.9£ 2.31 1.98 2.62 1.70 1.90 1.93 1.95 1.99 $2.53 2.67 2.57 $2.53 2. 65 2.56 $2.50 2.67 2. 55 $2.49 2.65 2. 55 $2.48 2.67 2.55 2.15 2. 59 2. 57 2. 88 2. 22 2. 62 2. 55 2. 86 2.17 2.09 2.61 2.54 2.79 2.16 2.07 2.61 2.54 2.71 2.16 2. 84 2.04 2.62 2.53 2.56 2.15 2.84 2.40 2.37 2. 28 2.22 2. 37 2. 23 2. 72 1.75 1.92 1.94 1.96 2. 01 1.87 1.81 2.07 1.93 1.78 2.14 2.88 2.42 2. 28 2. 68 1. 75 1.93 1.93 1. 98 2. 04 1.91 1. 84 2. 09 1.96 1. 80 2.17 2.19 2.89 2. 70 1.75 1.93 1.94 1.98 2. 01 1.90 1.83 2. 09 1.95 1.80 2.14 2.86 2.67 1.75 1.92 1.93 1.97 2. 01 1.88 1.82 2.08 1.92 1.79 2.13 2. 62 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.00 2.00 1.86 1.87 1.86 1.86 2.11 2.51 2. 50 2.80 2.15 2.77 2.51 2.77 2.14 2. 79 2. 53 2. 50 2.60 2.12 2.80 2.20 2.20 2.10 1.88 1.90 1.93 1.98 1.83 1.76 2.03 1.91 1.74 2.09 2.00 1.90 1.70 2.09 1.88 1. 92 1. 96 1. 84 1. <6 2. 02 1.90 1. 73 2. 09 2. 27 1.96 2.39 1.66 1.79 1. 77 1. 83 1. 87 1. 79 1. /U 1.95 1.82 1. Oo UZ C.—EARNINGS AND HOURS T able C -l. 935 Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 Industry Ju n e 2 M a y 2 Apr. Annual average 1965 Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 I 1964 Average weekly earnings Manufacturing—Continued Nondurable goods—Continued Apparel and related products.. ______ $68. 82 $68. 26 $67.15 $69.37 $68. 81 $66. 05 $67. 33 $67. 70 $67. 52 $67.33 $67. 53 $66.43 $66. 61 $66. 61 $64.26 85.31 85.47 83.54 85. 25 85.69 83.76 84. 2C 83.98 84.36 83.54 83.44 82. 08 84.32 81.86 76. 23 Men’s and boys’ suits and coats. Men’s and boys’ furnishings_________ 59.41 58.46 57.67 59. 09 59.31 58.46 58. 56 59.03 58.81 58. 66 58.14 57. 00 58.37 58.28 56. 09 Women’s, misses’, and juniors’ outerwear. ___. . . _ ------------- 71.89 71.55 70.99 73.28 72. 38 66.73 68.68 68. 21 68.27 69.14 70. 79 69.83 67.72 68. 54 66.78 Women’s and children’s undergarments__ . . . ________ ____ . . . . . 63. 07 62.93 61.39 63. 07 62. 73 59. 45 60. 96 62. 33 62.29 61.92 61.50 59.13 59.45 60. 56 58. 97 Hats, caps, and m illin e ry ..---- --------67.71 66. 40 73.66 74. 05 68. 42 69.36 66.18 68.95 71.57 72. 76 72.83 67.89 70. 08 69.33 Girls’ and children’s outerwear. _ . 65.30 63. 51 62. 47 64.38 64.94 61.40 60.16 61.01 61.01 60.16 61.96 62.53 62.12 61.15 58.19 74.17 71.91 71. 57 72.50 70. 76 72. 60 73. 57 75.68 73.60 73.30 71.20 71.37 71.18 67.87 Fur goods and miscellaneous apparel... Miscellaneous fabricated textile products__ _____________ _____ ___ 73. 33 73.91 73.71 73.92 73. 34 72.35 75. 08 77. 42 75.66 74.31 71.25 73.15 74.11 73. 73 70.47 119.19 119.03 117. 50 116.91 115.94 115.13 117. 82 116. 58 117.12 116.48 115.18 114.65 114.31 114. 22 109. 57 135. 00 134. 55 132. 76 131.72 131. 28 130. 69 131.87 131.12 131. 56 132.16 129. 20 130. 08 127.84 128.16 121.88 137. 56 139. 08 141.22 136.96 133.95 136. 05 138.16 136. 80 136.64 134.85 134.52 134. 06 129.94 132.14 124.32 104.58 103. 32 102. 34 101.99 101. 09 100. 85 102. 55 100. 91 100.74 99. 77 98. 95 98. 53 100.14 99. 42 96.28 108. 20 108.20 105. 59 107.10 105. 50 103. 58 108. 07 107. 57 107.32 106. 75 105.72 102. 58 104.30 103.81 100. 56 Printing, publishing and allied industries. 121. 83 122. 22 120. 51 121. 06 119. 74 117. 73 121. 60 118.97 119.66 120.28 118.81 117.12 117.43 118.12 114.35 Newspaper publishing and printing---- 124. 85 124. 87 122.40 119. 60 119.26 118. 22 125. 06 122.33 122.33 121.94 119.13 118.80 120.15 119. 49 116.84 Periodical publishing and printing___ 125. 76 124. 74 126. 00 125.22 124. 50 121. 06 122.15 128.47 131.14 129. 60 126.63 124.71 126. 23 122. 01 Books . . . . . 116.84 112. 59 114.36 111. 22 111. 22 114. 51 111 11 111 51 114 98 115 18 111 fi4 Commercial printing... _ . . . . . . . . 125.45 125. 45 124. 03 125. 77 124. 03 120. 59 124. 80 122.14 122!14 123. 07 1 2 1 .7 5 120. 04 119. 95 120! 96 116! 42 Bookbinding and related industries___ 93.27 95. 01 94.14 94.95 94.17 90.58 93.93 91.48 92.11 92.19 90.40 89.32 92. 59 91.57 89.40 Other publishing and printing industries___________ _________ ____ 122. 68 122.82 123.13 125.05 124.41 122.92 124. 82 120. 51 121. 99 121. 60 121. 29 118.42 119.12 120. 51 116.10 Average weekly hours Paper and allied products____ . . . Paper and pulp _______ __________ Paperboard.. . _______ . . . . Converted paper and paperboard oroducts__ ---- -- _ _ -------Paperboard containers and boxes. . . Apparel and related products_____ . Men’s and boys’ suits and coats______ Men’s and boys’ furnishings.. . ------Women’s, misses’, and juniors’ outerwear__ __ _________ Women’s and children’s undergarments------ --------- . . . -------- -----Hats, caps, and m illinery.. _ _ Girls'’ and children’s outerwear. ____ Fur goods and miscellaneous apparel... Miscellaneous fabricated textile* products___ _______ . . . ------ -- 36.8 38.6 37.6 36.5 38.5 37.0 36.1 37.8 36.5 34.9 34.9 37.1 36.8 36. 6 36.5 36.9 37.1 36.9 38.4 37.4 36.6 38.6 37.3 35.7 37.9 37.0 36.2 38.1 37.3 34.8 35.4 34.8 33.2 35.9 35.7 35.9 36. 5 37.1 37. 2 37.0 36. 7 36.9 37. 4 36.9 36. 8 35.6 36. 2 35.7 36 1 36.4 38.0 37.6 36.3 38.0 37.7 36.2 37.8 37.6 33.5 33.6 33.3 33.4 34.7 36.5 86 7 35.6 36.3 37.1 37.3 37.3 8fi 7 37.5 87 7 36! 1 36.6 36! 1 37.1 3 5 .6 3 7 .1 3 7 .4 37.0 36.7 36.8 36.9 38.1 38.0 36.5 38.0 37.5 36.6 38.5 37.9 36.4 37.9 37. 6 35.9 36.3 36.9 34.4 34.2 34.1 33.9 36.5 36.7 8fi fi 37!2 36.6 36.7 36.4 36! 4 36.5 35! 7 36.1 37.8 37.9 37.8 38.3 38.0 37.1 38.7 39.1 39.0 38.5 3 7 .9 38.5 38.4 38.4 38.3 43.5 45.0 45.4 43.6 45.0 45.9 43.2 44.7 46.3 43.3 44.5 45.5 43.1 44.5 44.5 42.8 44.3 45.2 43.8 44.7 45.9 43.5 44.6 45.6 43.7 44.9 45.7 43.3 44.8 44.8 4 3 .3 4 4 .4 4 5 .6 43.1 44.7 45.6 43.3 44.7 44.5 43.1 44.5 45.1 42.8 44. 0 44.4 42.0 42.6 42.0 42.6 41.6 41.9 41.8 42.5 41.6 42.2 41.5 41.6 42.2 43.4 41.7 43.2 41.8 43.1 41.4 42.7 41.4 42.8 41.4 41.7 41.9 42.4 41.6 42.2 41.5 41.9 38.8 36.4 38.5 36.0 39. 6 41.7 39.5 38.9 38.8 35.7 40 0 42 2 39.8 39.4 38.5 35.6 39. 5 41. 5 39.5 39.4 38.1 35.5 39. 4 41. 5 38.9 37.9 39.1 37.0 88 8 42 1 40. 0 39.3 38.5 36.3 38.6 36.3 38.8 36.4 40 fi 42 1 38.7 36.1 40 5 42 5 38.4 36.0 40 2 41 5 38.5 36.3 40 1 40 9 38. 6 36.1 38.5 36.4 40 4 39.7 38.7 38.8 36.3 39.3 42. 8 39.7 39.1 39! 4 38.6 39! 4 38.7 3 9 .7 3 9 .4 3 9 .1 38.8 38.5 3 9 .2 3 9 .4 39.4 38.8 3 9 .2 38.9 38.7 38.5 38.6 39.2 39.0 38.9 39.5 39.1 39.0 Average hourly earnings 39.1 39.0 38.7 38.8 39. 0 38.7 Apparel and related products.. . Men’s and boys’ suits and coats. _ . Men’s and boys’ furnishings____ . . . Women’s, misses’, and juniors’ outerwear__ _ __ ____ _ _ Women’s and children’s undergarments. Hats, caps, and m illinery.. ____ Girls’ and children’s outerwear______ Fur goods and miscellaneous apparel .. Miscellaneous fabricated textile" products______________________ ____ $1.87 2. 21 1.58 $1.87 2. 22 1.58 $1.86 2.21 1.58 $1.88 2.22 1.58 $1.88 2.22 1.59 $1.85 2. 21 1.58 $1.86 2. 21 1. 57 $1.86 2. 21 1. 57 $1.86 2.22 1.56 $1.86 2. 21 1.56 $1.83 2.19 1.53 $1.82 2.16 1.52 $1.82 2.19 1.54 $1.83 2.16 1.55 $1.79 2.10 1.52 2. 06 1.70 2. 05 1.71 1. 85 1.74 2. 01 2.04 1.71 1.86 1.74 1. 97 2.07 1.70 1.98 1.74 1.95 2.08 1.70 1.98 1.76 1.97 2. 01 1.67 1 89 1.72 1.96 2. 05 1.67 1 89 1. 69 2.00 2.03 1.68 2.05 1.67 l! 69 2.04 2.04 1.64 1 98 1.67 1.96 2. 03 1.62 1 99 1.69 1.94 1.98 1.62 1 8fi 1.67 1.95 2. 01 1.65 1 92 l! 69 2. 01 2.07 1.66 1 95 1.69 2.00 1.97 1.62 1. 91 1.63 1. 88 1.94 1.95 1.95 1.93 1.93 1.95 1.94 1.98 1.94 1.93 1.88 1.90 1.93 1.92 1.84 Paper and allied products... ............ ._ Paper and p u l p _______ _ . . . Paperboard___ _ ______ . . . . . . Converted paper and paperboard products__ _. ____ _____ _ _____ _ Paperboard containers and boxes_____ 2. 74 3. 00 3.03 2. 73 2. 99 3.03 2. 72 2. 97 3. 05 2. 70 2. 96 3. 01 2. 69 2.95 3.01 2. 69 2.95 3.01 2.69 2. 95 3. 01 2.68 2. 94 3.00 2.68 2.93 2.99 2. 69 2.95 3. 01 2. 66 2.91 2. 95 2. 66 2.91 2.94 2.64 2. 86 2.92 2. 65 2. 88 2.93 2. 56 2. 77 2.80 2.49 2.54 2.46 2.54 2.46 2. 52 2. 44 2.52 2. 43 2. 50 2. 43 2. 49 2.43 2.49 2. 42 2.49 2.41 2.49 2.41 2. 50 2.39 2.47 2.38 2.46 2.39 2.46 2. 39 2. 46 2.32 2.40 Printing, publishing and allied industries. Newspaper publishing and printing__ Periodical publishing and printing. ... Books. . . . __________ . . . . _ . Commercial printing____ _________ Bookbinding and related industries___ Other publishing and printing industries___________ _____ ________ See footnotes at end of table. 3.14 3.43 3.13 3. 40 3.15 2. 70 3.14 2.42 3.12 3.35 3.15 2 71 3.16 2.41 3.11 3. 35 3.17 2 68 3.14 2.39 3.09 3. 33 3.16 2. 68 3.10 2.39 3.11 3. 38 8 12 3.09 3. 37 8 14 3.10 3.37 8 18 3.10 3.35 3. 23 2 78 3.16 2.41 3.15 3.44 3. 20 2. 73 3.16 2. 43 3.12 2. 39 3 ! 10 2 .3 7 3 .1 0 2.38 3 .1 0 2 .3 7 3. 07 3.30 3. 20 2.71 3.09 2.33 3. 05 3.30 3.15 2 69 3.07 2.32 3. 05 3.31 3.11 2. 71 3.06 2.35 3.06 3.31 3.14 2. 68 3. 07 2.36 2. 97 3. 21 3. 02 2.62 2.97 2.31 3.17 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.16 3.16 3. 09 3.12 3 .1 1 3.11 3.06 3.07 3.09 3.00 Paper and allied products.. Paper and p u l p ___________ __ ----Paperboard. . . . . ____ ____ _____ Converted paper and paperboard products___ . . . . . . . . . . _____ . Paperboard containers and boxes_____ Printing, publishing and allied industries. Newspaper publishing and printing__ Periodical publishing and printing . Books. _ . . . . . Commercial printing____ . . . _ _ . Bookbinding and related industries___ Other publishing and printing industries ___ ______ _ ... _ 2 2 4 -9 6 6 O— 66- -S https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1.76 1.6 8 1 .9 5 38.7 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 936 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, 922. June2 May 2 Apr. Annual average 1965 1966 Industry Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. $123. 65 140.15 123. 69 107. 59 116.20 114.26 101.76 118.72 $121.35 136.18 121.11 105. 73 113. 96 113.82 99.72 117.74 July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Manufacturing—Continued Nondurable goods— Continued Chemicals and allied products-----Industrial chemicals___________ Plastics materials and synthetics. Drugs_______________________ Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods.. Paints, varnishes, and allied products.. Agricultural chemicals_________ Other chemical products_______ $126.35 $124.49 $124. 66 $122. 64 $123.19 $122.18 142.19 139.26 139.68 137. 76 137.34 136.27 126. 56 125.40 125.99 122. 09 123. 54 121. 25 112. 75 112. 20 112. 34 111.93 111.79 111.79 117.71 116.47 116. 20 115.90 115.62 118. 58 120.13 118.02 115. 23 113.99 112.75 102.10 106.39 108. 35 106. 48 103.49 102. 53 120. 56 119.28 118.43 115. 62 116. 72 117. 03 $123. 35 $123.06 $122. 06 138.32 138. 65 137.34 122. 98 122. 40 120. 69 110. 56 110.15 109.20 117 18 115. 92 115.49 113. 85 113. 30 113.44 102. 67 100. 44 100. 01 116.90 118. 86 118.86 $120.22 $120. 96 $121. 09 135. 43 135.66 136. 08 120. 69 121.27 120. 70 105. 99 106. 86 107. 30 111. 63 113.16 112. 74 113.13 114.51 112. 88 100. 06 97.25 100. 69 117. 46 117.17 116. 48 $116.48 131.04 116.89 102.77 108.27 109. 03 97.63 112.56 Petroleum refining and related industries. 146. 63 145.95 145. 69 141. 62 140.95 140.87 140. 53 142. 97 141.10 142.68 138.35 139.10 137.38 138. 42 133. 66 153. 91 154.94 154. 21 149. 58 148.10 148. 39 148. 87 150. 78 147.49 148. 94 143. 03 144.21 143. 52 145. 05 139. 52 Petroleum refining--------------------124.65 117.12 115. 87 111. 87 113.13 113.82 110. 77 114.65 119.97 123. 66 123. 47 122.43 117.59 115. 90 112.75 Other petroleum and coal products Rubber and miscellaneous plastic prod ucts__________________ _________ 111. 72 111. 57 110.35 110. 46 110.88 111.14 113.42 111.94 112.10 110. 46 109.88 109.25 109. 46 109. 62 104. 90 Tires and inner tubes------- --------------- 163. 02 163.44 162. 79 159. 56 161. 01 162. 62 167.17 161. 73 165.62 162. 62 163.08 161.19 155. 05 158. 06 142.54 Other rubber products_____________ 105. 37 105.83 104. 65 105. 57 105. 83 106. 08 108.03 106. 59 104.39 102.82 102.75 101.75 104.83 103. 41 99. 96 93.83 93.15 92.48 92. 96 93.15 91.91 93.02 92.80 93.44 92.35 91.08 90. 61 92.60 91.72 89.64 Miscellaneous plastic products---------Leather and leather products__________ 75. 85 74.88 72. 95 73. 92 75.26 Leather tanning and finishing----------- 103. 25 103. 00 102. 09 101. 52 100. 61 Footwear, except rubber____________ 73. 51 71.81 69.94 71.05 72.34 72. 77 72. 96 71.63 72. 77 73.33 Other leather products_____________ 68.44 67.89 69.91 70. 09 Handbags and personal leather goods. 74.11 74.87 72.58 71.82 99. 31 101.02 101. 50 101. 02 71.39 71.94 68. 82 67. 53 71.44 74.11 72.93 72. 56 65.88 68. 22 71.34 70.80 71.82 98. 40 68.63 70.68 67.69 72.19 97.75 69. 34 70.67 68. 04 71.80 94. 96 69.30 70. 09 69. 45 72.19 98. 47 69.16 70. 47 67.84 71.82 97. 99 68. 80 70. 49 67. 86 68.98 94.19 66.55 66.73 64.88 Average weekly hours 42.2 42.9 42.3 42.2 42.2 42.8 40.8 41.3 42.6 44.7 42.0 42.4 42.2 43.0 41.0 41.3 42.0 46.5 41.7 42.0 42.0 42.1 41.0 41.5 41.6 45.7 41.0 41.9 42.0 42.6 41.1 41.1 41.3 43.3 41.1 41.7 41.8 42.1 41.1 41.0 41.0 42.9 41.5 42.1 42.3 42.7 41.1 41. 7 41.4 42.6 41. 6 42.0 42.4 42. 5 41.1 41.4 41.2 42.2 42.0 41.8 42.0 42.2 40.9 41.1 41.4 42.2 42.0 42.2 42.6 42.8 40.6 41. 5 41.7 42.4 42.1 41.7 41.9 42.2 40.2 40.7 42.0 41.9 42.2 41.6 41. S 42.2 40.2 40.5 41.9 42.4 42.1 42.0 42. C 42.7 41.1 41. C 42. 1 42.1 42.3 41.9 42.0 42.5 40. S 40.7 41.5 43.4 41.9 41.6 41.6 42.2 40.3 40. 4 41.3 43.2 42.0 Petroleum refining and related industries Petroleum refining_________________ Other petroleum and coal products___ 43.0 42.4 45.0 42.8 42.8 42.9 42.6 42.6 42.6 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.7 41.6 41.9 41.8 41.8 42.0 41.7 41.7 41.8 42.3 42.0 43.1 42.5 41.9 44.6 43.5 42.8 45.8 42.7 41.7 45.9 42.8 41.8 46.2 42.4 41.6 45.4 42.2 41.8 43.9 41.9 41.4 43.7 Rubber and miscellaneous plastic prod ucts____________________________ Tires and inner tubes______________ Other rubber products______________ Miscellaneous plastic products_______ 42.0 44.3 41.0 41.7 42.1 44.9 41.5 41.4 41.8 44.6 41.2 41.1 42.0 44.2 41.4 41.5 42.0 44.6 41.5 41.4 42.1 44.8 41.6 41.4 42.8 45.8 41.9 42.4 44.8 41.8 41.8 42.3 45.5 41.1 41.9 42.0 44.8 40.8 41.6 42.1 45. c 41.1 41.4 41.7 44.9 40.7 41.0 42.1 43. Í 41.6 41.9 42.0 44.4 41.2 41.5 41.3 41.8 40.8 41.5 39.1 41.3 39.1 38.5 38.6 41.2 38.4 38.4 37.4 37.8 41.0 37.4 37.9 37.1 38.5 41.1 38.2 38.5 38.2 39.2 40.9 39.1 38.8 38.3 38.8 40.7 38.8 38.0 36.6 39.2 41.4 39.1 38.8 37.9 38.2 41.6 37.4 39. ( 39.2 37.8 41.4 36.9 38. Í 38.9 37.8 41.0 37.3 38.0 37.4 38.4 40.9 38.1 38.2 37.8 38.6 39.9 38.5 38. Í 38.8 38,4 41.2 38.0 38. Í 37.9 38.2 41.0 37.8 38.1 37.7 37.9 40.6 37.6 37.7 37.5 Chemicals and allied products................ Industrial chemicals_______________ Plastics materials and synthetics____ Drugs___________________________ Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods--------Paints, varnishes, and allied products. Agricultural chemicals.......................... Other chemical products___________ 42.4 42.7 42.9 41.0 Leather and leather products__________ Leather tanning and finishing_______ Footwear, except rubber____________ Other leather products_____________ Handbags and personal leather goods 42 2 Average hourly earnings 2.81 2.38 2.85 $2.95 3. 30 2.93 2. 75 2.85 2. 82 2.38 2.84 $2.94 3.31 2.93 2. 74 2.82 2.81 2. 33 2.84 $2.92 3.28 2. 90 2. 73 2.80 2. 77 2. 33 2.82 $2.94 3.27 2.90 2. 72 2.82 2. 76 2.39 2.84 $2.93 3.26 2.88 2.72 2.82 2.75 2.3S 2.82 $2.93 3. 27 2.88 2.69 2.81 2.75 2.41 2.81 $2.93 3.27 2.88 2.68 2.80 2. 75 2.38 2.83 $2.92 3.27 2.86 2.67 2.81 2.74 2.37 2.83 $2.93 3.29 2.89 2.65 2. 80 2.74 2.40 2.82 $2.91 3.25 2.87 2.63 2.80 2.71 2.38 2.79 $2.89 3.24 2.86 2.63 2.77 2.70 2.36 2.79 $2.88 3.23 2.84 2.60 2.76 2.72 2.31 2.77 $2.89 3. 24 2.84 2.63 2. 77 2.72 2.32 2.78 $2.80 3.15 2.77 2.55 2.68 2.64 2.26 2.68 Petroleum refining and related industries. Petroleum refining_________________ Other petroleum and coal products...... 3.41 3. 63 2. 77 3.41 3. 62 2. 73 3.42 3. 62 2. 72 3.38 3. 57 2.67 3.38 3.56 2. 70 3.37 3.55 2. 71 3.37 3.57 2. 65 3.38 3.59 2.66 3.32 3.52 2.69 3.28 3.48 2.70 3.24 3.43 2.69 3.25 3.45 2.65 3.24 3.45 2.59 3. 28 3.47 2.64 3.19 3. 37 2.58 Rubber and miscellaneous plastic prod ucts____________________________ Tires and inner tubes______________ Other rubber products______________ Miscellaneous plastic products_______ 2.66 3. 68 2. 57 2. 25 2. 65 3.64 2. 55 2. 25 2.64 3. 65 2.54 2.25 2. 63 3.61 2. 55 2. 24 2.64 3.61 2.55 2.25 2.64 3.6; 2. 55 2.22 2. 65 3. 65 2.56 2.22 2. 64 3.61 2. 55 2.22 2.65 3.64 2. 54 2.23 2.63 3.63 2.52 2.22 2.61 3.60 2.50 2.20 2.62 3.59 2.50 2.21 2.60 3. 54 2.52 2.21 2.61 3.56 2. 51 2.21 2.54 3.41 2.45 2.16 Leather and leather products__________ Leather tanning and finishing_______ Footwear, except rubber____________ Other leather products_____________ Handbags and personal leather goods. 1.94 2. 5( 1.88 1.85 1.94 2. 50 1.87 1.90 1.83 1.93 2. 49 1.87 1.89 1.83 1.92 2. 47 1.86 1.89 1.83 1.92 2.46 1.85 1.89 1.83 1.91 2.44 1.84 1.8f 1.80 1.91 2. 44 1.84 1.91 1.80 1.90 2.44 1.84 1.87 1.82 1.90 2. 44 1.83 1.87 1.82 1.90 2.40 1.84 1.86 1.81 1.88 2.39 1.82 1.85 1.80 1.86 2.38 1.80 1.83 1.79 1.88 2.39 1.82 1.84 1.79 1.88 2.39 1.82 1.85 1.80 1.82 2.32 1.77 1.77 1.73 Chemicals and allied products____ Industrial chemicals___________ Plastics materials and synthetics. Drugs_______________________ Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods.. Paints, varnishes, and allied products.. Agricultural chemicals_________ Other chemical products_______ $2.98 3. 33 2. 95 2. 75 See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis C.—EARNINGS AND HOURS T able C -l. 937 Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Annual average IndustryJu n e2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Transportation and public utilities: Railroad transportation: Class I railroads3--------------------------Local and interurban passenger transit: Local and suburban transportation... Intercity and rural bus lines_______ Motor freight transportation and storage. Public -warehousing______________ Pipeline transportation____________ Communication__________________ Telephone communication________ Telegraph communication4_______ Radio and television broadcasting... Electric, gas, and sanitary services___ Electric companies and systems___ Gas companies and systems___ ___ Combined utility systems________ Water, steam, and sanitary systems. $113.09 $111.41 $109. 62 $109.10 $108.00 143.10 144. 05 131. 77 138.60 141. 32 132. 72 131.36 131.88 132.40 128. 54 95. 44 92.82 92.98 95.34 93.26 151.37 153.18 150.75 151. 00 150. 32 116. 47 116. 29 116.47 117. 74 115. 20 111. 63 111.08 111.63 112.87 110.12 127.17 124. 99 124. 26 123. 54 123.97 148.13 148.92 148.45 150.42 148. 45 135.14 134. 40 133.25 135.62 135. 20 137. 78 136.29 136.29 136. 54 137. 03 123. 53 122. 61 121.58 124. 92 124.31 147. 38 146. 26 144.89 149.29 148.19 108. 26 110. 42 107.83 110.51 108. 99 $132.76 $133.04 $128.23 $131. 54 $129. 77 $131.10 $132.16 $130. 80 $121. 80 108.88 109. 04 110. 08 109.56 110.17 108. 97 109. 06 107. 78 104.16 135. 72 137. 02 135.91 139.29 143. 04 140. 67 132.32 133. 42 125.83 132.37 131. 44 133.18 133. 92 132. 62 131.27 131.27 130. 48 124. 02 94.13 94.76 93.06 94.58 96. 46 94.87 94.16 93.26 91.53 148.88 149.19 147.50 147. 84 145. 73 144. 55 141.29 145. 85 142.55 117. 45 119. 97 116.97 118.12 113. 52 113.27 112.80 114. 62 110.15 112. 59 115. 50 111.66 112.75 108.27 108. 40 107. 33 109. 08 105.32 124. 99 126. 44 124. 56 126.15 126. 00 125. 43 124. 42 122. 55 116.05 150. 75 149. 60 151.93 153. 03 146. 43 144.54 147. 94 147. 63 140.66 134. 05 135. 43 134.69 133. 86 130. 60 130. 51 129. 47 131.24 125.25 135. 38 134. 96 134.96 136. 69 133. 31 133. 31 132.57 133. 31 127.62 123. 30 124. 50 125. 52 123. 07 119.36 119. 43 118.26 120. 83 116. 03 147. 42 150.88 147.77 145. 05 141.59 140. 76 140.35 143. 79 135. 55 106. 55 107. 90 106. 50, 107. 43 106.85 106.34 103. 98 105.16 101.19 Average weekly hours Transportation and public utilities: Railroad transportation: Class I railroads3________________ Local and interurban passenger transit: Local and suburban transportation... Intercity and rural bus lines_______ Motor freight transportation and storage. Public warehousing________________ Pipeline transportation_______________ Communication____ _________________ Telephone communication__________ Telegraph communication4_________ Radio and television broadcasting____ Electric, gas, and sanitary services........... Electric companies and systems______ Gas companies and systems_______ Combined utility systems________ Water, steam, and sanitary systems. 43.0 45.0 42.0 39.6 40.8 40.3 40.3 43.7 39.5 41.2 41.5 40.5 41.4 40.7 42.2 45.3 41.7 39.0 41.4 40.1 40.1 43.1 39.5 41.1 41.3 40.6 41.2 41.2 42.0 42.1 42.0 39.4 41.3 40.3 40.3 42.7 39.8 41.0 41.3 40.8 40.7 41.0 41.8 44.0 42.3 40.4 40.7 40.6 40.6 42.6 39.9 41.6 41.5 41.5 41.7 41.7 41.7 44.3 41.6 40.2 40.3 40.0 39.9 42.6 39.8 41.6 41.4 41.3 42.1 41.6 44.4 44.2 42.6 43.7 43.4 43.7 44.2 43.6 43.5 42.2 43.5 42.7 40.4 40.9 40.5 40.5 43.1 40.2 41.5 41.4 41.1 42.0 41.3 42.1 44.2 42.4 41.2 41.1 41.8 42.0 43.3 40.0 41.8 41.4 41.5 42.5 41.5 42.5 43.7 43.1 42.3 41.2 40.9 40.9 43.1 40.3 41.7 41.4 41.7 42.1 41.6 42.3 44.5 43.2 41.3 42.0 41.3 41.3 43.5 40.7 41.7 41.8 41.3 41.8 41.8 42.7 45.7 43.2 40.7 41.4 40.4 40.4 43.6 39.9 41.2 41.4 40.6 41.4 41.9 42.4 44.8 42.9 40.2 41.3 40.6 40.6 43.4 39.6 41.3 41.4 40.9 41.4 41.7 42.6 43.1 42.9 39.9 40.6 40.0 39.9 43.2 40.2 41.1 41.3 40.5 41.4 41.1 42.1 43.6 42.5 40.2 41.2 40.5 40.4 43.0 39.9 41.4 41.4 41.1 41.8 41.4 42.0 42.8 41.9 40.5 41.2 40.2 40.2 42.2 39.4 41.2 41.3 41.0 41.2 41.3 $2.99 $3.00 $2.99 $3.00 $2.80 2.58 2.57 3.13 3.14 3.07 3.06 2.37 2.36 3.52 3.50 2.81 ■ 2.79 2.68 2.67 2.89 2.89 3.67 3. 65 3.17 3.16 3.22 3.22 2.94 2.92 3.42 3.40 2.55 2.55 2.56 3. 07 3. 06 2.36 3. 48 2.82 2.69 2.88 3. 68 3.15 3.21 2.92 3. 39 2.53 2. 56 3.06 3. 07 2.32 3.54 2.83 2. 70 2.85 3. 70 3.17 3.22 2.94 3. 44 2. 54 2. 48 2. 94 2. 96 2.26 3. 46 2.74 2.62 2.75 3.57 3.04 3.09 2.83 3.29 2.45 Average hourly earnings Transportation and public utilities : Railroad transportation: Class I railroads3__________________ Local and interurban passenger transit: Local and suburban transportation___ Intercity and rural bus lines_________ Motor freight transportation and storage. Public warehousing------------------------Pipeline transportation_______________ Communication_____________________ Telephone communication__________ Telegraph communication4_________ Radio and television broadcasting........ Electric, gas, and sanitary services_____ Electric companies and systems______ Gas companies and systems_________ Combined utility systems___________ Water, steam, and sanitary systems__ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis $2.63 3.18 3.16 2. 41 3.71 2. 89 2.77 2. 91 3. 75 3. 28 3.32 3. 05 3. 56 2. 66 $2.64 3.18 3.15 2.38 3. 70 2.90 2.77 2.90 3. 77 3. 27 3. 30 3.02 3. 55 2. 68 $2. 61 3.13 3.14 2.36 3. 65 2.89 2.77 2.91 3.73 3.25 3.30 2.98 3.56 2.63 $2.61 3.15 3.13 2.36 3. 71 2.90 2.78 2.90 3.77 3.26 3.29 3. 01 3.58 2.65 $2.59 3.19 3.09 2.32 3.73 2.88 2.76 2.91 3.73 3.25 3.31 3.01 3.52 2. 62 $2.99 $3.01 $3.01 $3.01 2. 58 3.12 3.10 2. 33 3.64 2.90 2.78 2.90 3.75 3. 23 3. 27 3.00 3.51 2.58 2. 59 3.10 3.10 2. 30 3.63 2. 87 2. 75 2. 92 3.74 3. 24 3. 26 3.00 3. 55 2.60 2.59 3.11 3. 09 2.20 3.58 2.86 2.73 2.89 3.77 3.23 3.26 3. 01 3. 51 2.56 2.59 3.13 3.10 2.29 3.52 2.86 2.73 2.90 3.76 3.21 3.27 2.98 3. 47 2.57 938 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Annual average Industry June2 May 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Wholesale and retail trade 8_____________ $79. 66 Wholesale trad e......................................... 110.98 Motor vehicles and automotive equip m ent___________________________ Drugs, chemicals, and allied products.. Dry goods and apparel_____________ Groceries and related products_______ Electrical goods___________________ Hardware, plumbing, and heating goods__________________________ Machinery, equipment, and supplies... Miscellaneous wholesalers___________ Retail trade 6_______________________ 69.33 General merchandise stores_________ Department stores_______________ Mail order houses_____________ ___ L i m i t e d p r i c e v a r i e t y s t o r e s ____________ Food stores_______________________ Grocery, meat, and vegetable stores.. Apparel and accessories stores_______ Men’s and boys’ apparel stores......... . Women’s ready-to-wear stores______ Family clothing stores________ ___ Shoe stores______________________ $78.60 $78.23 $77. 49 $77. 70 $77. 54 $77. 29 $76. 80 $77.42 $77.25 $77. 75 $77.95 $76. 56 $76. 53 $74. 28 111.11 110.43 109.48 109.08 108. 94 109. 59 108.12 107. 57 106.90 106. 60 106.60 105. 93 106. 49 102. 56 103. 66 113.88 107. 54 101. 34 126. 85 103.00 113. 88 105. 75 100.04 126.85 102. 66 112. 00 105. 08 99. 72 125.85 101.33 111.08 105.18 99. 31 126.58 101.09 112.44 103. 32 98.33 124. 84 102. 06 112. 06 105. 26 98. 77 130. 24 101. 82 111.24 104.98 96. 80 128. 63 100.91 110.84 105.46 97.10 127. 02 101.40 99. 54 100. 20 99. 72 99. 72 96. 79 110.16 108. 27 108. 54 107. 33 108. 68 105. 04 104. 23 104. 23 101. 79 101. 14 103. 19 99.94 98.16 98.53 98. 70 97. 11 97. 00 94.16 123. 55 121.41 120. 27 122. 55 122. 84 111.79 106. 60 106.49 105. 67 106. 37 105. 41 105. 67 104.04 104.19 103. 53 103. 32 101.91 101. 50 101. 91 98. 01 120. 01 120. 01 117.96 117. 55 117. 01 117. 99 116. 88 116.75 115. 23 116. 06 115.92 113. 99 115. 23 111.52 110. 68 110. 28 109.07 109. 34 109. 89 111. 11 108. 81 107. 74 107. 33 107.06 107. 06 106. 80 107. 20 104. 38 68.19 67.47 67. 47 67.30 67. 49 67. 90 67.13 67.33 67.53 68. 07 68. 25 67. 16 66. 61 64. 75 60. 57 59.73 59.40 59. 22 58. 53 60. 55 58. 74 59.79 60.16 60.19 60. 72 59. 33 58. 81 56. 77 64. 55 63.69 63.17 62.98 62. 08 63. 30 61.88 63.69 64. 51 64. 22 64. 98 63. 69 62. 98 61.18 70.85 68. 61 68.94 67.40 66. 78 79. 80 68.61 69.81 72. 67 70.56 71.08 72. 30 71.00 70.12 45.14 44.97 44. 82 44. 53 44. 53 46. 53 44. 64 44. 62 44.47 44.98 45.30 43. 92 44.10 41.53 71.14 70. 26 70. 26 70.56 70.56 70.17 71.19 70. 51 71.76 72. 78 72.42 71. 14 70. 32 68.51 72.36 71.26 71.26 71.69 71.57 71.53 72. 21 71.87 73. 01 74. 05 74. 05 72. 38 71.69 69. 55 57.85 58.35 56.90 57. 55 58.38 60.38 57.23 57.93 57. 78 57.97 58.82 57. 29 57. 46 55.26 69. 80 69. 65 68.56 69.40 71.20 70. 42 69.05 69.89 69. 06 70. 64 72. 67 70. 76 69. 84 67.53 52.33 52.33 51.36 51.04 52. 49 54. 54 51.52 51.99 51.65 51.10 52.48 51. 10 51.46 49.73 57.88 57. 73 57. 40 66. 57 58. 71 60.53 56. 90 57.61 56.95 58. 31 59. 00 55. 77 56. 45 54.27 55.54 59. 67 55.67 56. 52 56. 65 59. 40 56.03 57.33 59. 33 58.65 57. 75 56. 99 56.64 55.21 Average weekly hours W h o le s a le a n d r e t a i l t r a d e 8__________________ W h o le s a le t r a d e ______________________________ M o to r v e h i c l e s a n d a u t o m o t i v e e q u i p m e n t . . _____ ______________________________ D r u g s , c h e m i c a ls , a n d a l li e d p r o d u c t s .. D r y g o o d s a n d a p p a r e l ___________________ G r o c e r ie s a n d r e la t e d p r o d u c t s _________ E l e c t r i c a l g o o d s ______ _____ _______________ H a r d w a r e , p l u m b in g , and h e a t in g g o o d s _________________ ___________________ M a c h in e r y , e q u i p m e n t , a n d s u p p l i e s . . . M i s c e ll a n e o u s w h o l e s a l e r s _______________ R e t a i l t r a d e 5________________________________ G e n e r a l m e r c h a n d i s e s t o r e s _____________ D e p a r t m e n t s t o r e s _____________________ M a il o r d e r h o u s e s ______ _____ __________ L i m i t e d p r i c e v a r i e t y s t o r e s . ................... F o o d s t o r e s ________________________________ G ro c e r y , m e a t, a n d v e g e ta b le sto r e s . A p p a r e l a n d a c c e s s o r ie s s t o r e s __________ M e n ’s a n d b o y s ’ a p p a r e l s t o r e s _______ W o m e n ’s r e a d y - t o - w e a r s t o r e s . . ______ F a m i l y c l o t h i n g s t o r e s . ............................... S h o e s t o r e s ______________________________ 37.4 40.8 36.3 36.9 40.7 36.9 40.6 36.9 40.7 37.0 40.7 37.1 40.8 37.7 41.2 37.1 40.8 37.4 40.9 37.5 40.8 38.3 41.0 38.4 41.0 37.9 40.9 37.7 40.8 37.9 40.7 41.8 40.1 38.0 40.7 43.0 41.7 40.1 37.5 40.5 43.0 41.9 40.0 37.8 40.7 43.1 41.7 40.1 37.7 40.7 43.2 41.6 40.3 37.3 40.8 42.9 42.0 40.6 38.0 41.5 44.3 41.9 40.6 37.9 40.5 43.9 41.7 40.6 37.8 40.8 43.5 41.9 40.5 37.9 40.9 42.9 42.0 40.4 37.9 41.4 42.6 42.1 40.5 37.7 42.0 42.2 41.9 40.2 37.6 41.5 43.0 41.9 40.4 37.8 41.1 42.8 41.9 40.4 38.0 41.3 41.1 41.0 41.1 40.1 35.7 33.1 33.1 34.9 30.5 33.4 33.5 32.5 34.9 32.3 32.7 29.7 40.8 41.1 40.1 35.7 33.0 33.0 33.8 30.8 33.3 33.3 32.6 35.0 32.5 32.8 30.6 40.8 41.1 40.1 35.7 33.0 32.9 34.3 30.7 33.3 33.3 32.7 34.8 32.3 32.8 31.1 40.6 41.1 40.2 35.8 32.9 32.8 33.7 30.5 33.6 33.5 32.7 34.7 32.1 32.7 31.4 40.7 41.2 40.4 35.9 32.7 32.5 33.9 30.5 33.6 33.6 32.8 34.9 32.4 32.8 31.3 40.8 41.4 40.7 36.7 35. 0 34.4 42. 0 33.0 33.9 33.9 34.5 36.3 34.3 34.2 33. 0 40.8 41.3 40.3 35.9 33.0 32.4 36.3 31.0 33.9 33.9 32.7 34.7 32.4 32.7 31.3 40.7 41.4 40.2 36.2 33.4 33.0 35.8 31.2 33.9 33.9 33.1 35.3 32.7 33.3 31.5 40.6 41.3 40.2 36.5 33.8 33.6 36.7 31.1 34.5 34.6 33.4 35.6 32.9 33.5 31.9 41.0 41.6 40.4 37.4 34.2 33.8 36.0 31.9 35.5 35.6 34.3 36.6 33.4 34.3 34.1 40.6 41.4 40.4 37.5 34.5 34.2 35.9 31.9 35.5 35.6 34.6 36.7 34.3 34.5 33.0 40.6 41.3 40.3 36.9 33.9 33.7 36.7 31.6 34.7 34.8 33.7 36.1 33.4 33.0 32.2 40.6 41.3 40.3 36.6 33.8 33.5 36.6 31.5 34.3 34.3 33.6 36.0 33.2 33.4 32.0 40.5 41.0 40.3 37.0 34.2 33.8 37.7 31.7 34.6 34.6 33.9 36.7 33.6 33.5 32.1 Average hourly earnings Wholesale and retail trade 6____________ Wholesale trade____________________ Motor vehicles and automotive equip ment_________________________ Drugs, chemicals, and allied products.. Dry goods and apparel_____ ____ _ Groceries and related products..... ....... Electrical goods_________ ____ ___ Hardware, plumbing, and heating goods______ ___ ______________ Machinery, equipment, and supplies. _. Miscellaneous wholesalers__ ________ Retail trade 5______________________ General merchandise stores_________ Department stores______________ Mail order houses_______________ Limited price variety stores_______ Food stores___________ ____ _____ Grocery, meat, and vegetable stores. Apparel and accessories stores_______ Men’s and boys’ apparel stores____ Women’s ready-to-wear stores_____ Family clothing stores__________ Shoe stores____________________ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis $2.13 2. 72 1. 91 $2.13 2. 73 $2.12 2.72 $2.10 2.69 $2.10 2.68 $2.09 2. 67 $2.05 2. 66 $2. 07 2. 65 $2.07 2.63 $2.06 2.62 $2.03 2.60 $2. 03 2. 60 $2.02 2. 59 $2. 03 2. 61 $1.96 2. 52 2.48 2.84 2.83 2.49 2.95 2.47 2. 84 2. 82 2.47 2. 95 2.45 2.80 2. 78 2. 45 2.92 2.43 2. 77 2. 79 2.44 2.93 2. 43 2.79 2. 77 2.41 2. 91 2.43 2. 76 2. 77 2. 38 2. 94 2.43 2. 74 2. 77 2.39 2.93 2 42 2.73 2.79 2.38 2.92 2. 42 2. 72 2. 75 2. 40 2.88 2.37 2. 68 2.75 2.38 2.85 2.38 2.68 2.70 2.35 2. 85 2.38 2.67 2. 69 2.34 2.85 2. 38 2.69 2. 73 2. 36 2. 87 2. 31 2.60 2.63 2.28 2. 72 2.60 2.92 2.76 1.91 1.83 1.95 2. 03 1.48 2.13 2.16 1.78 2. 00 1.62 1.77 1.87 2.61 2.92 2. 75 1.89 1.81 1.93 2. 03 1.46 2.11 2.14 1.79 1.99 1.61 1.76 1.95 2.59 2. 87 2. 72 1.89 1.80 1.92 2. 01 1.46 2.11 2.14 1.74 1.97 1.59 1.75 1.79 2.62 2.86 2. 72 1.88 1.80 1.92 2.00 1.46 2.10 2.14 1.76 2.00 1.59 1.73 1.80 2. 59 2. 84 2. 72 1.88 1.79 1.91 1.97 1.46 2.10 2.13 1.78 2.04 1.62 1.7S 1.81 2.59 3. 85 2. 73 1. 85 1. 73 1.84 1.90 1.41 2. 07 2.11 1. 75 1.94 1.59 1.77 1.80 2. 55 2.83 2. 70 1.87 1.78 1.91 1.89 1.44 2.10 2.13 1.75 1.99 1. 59 1.74 1. 79 2.56 2.82 2.68 1.86 1.79 1.93 1.95 1.43 2.08 2.12 1.75 1.98 1.59 1.73 1.82 2. 55 2.79 2.67 1.85 1.78 1.92 1.98 1.43 2.08 2.11 1.73 1.94 1.57 1.7C 1.86 2. 52 2. 79 2.65 1.82 1.76 1.90 1.96 1.41 2. 05 2.08 1.6S 1.93 1.53 1.7C 1.72 2.51 2.80 2. 65 1.82 1.76 1.90 1.98 1.42 2.04 2.08 1.70 1.98 1.53 1.71 1.75 2. 50 2. 76 2. 65 1.82 1.75 1.89 1.97 1.39 2.05 2.08 1.70 1.96 1.53 1.69 1.77 2. 51 2. 79 2. 66 1.82 1.74 1.88 1.94 1.40 2.05 2.09 1.71 1.94 1.55 1.69 1.77 2.42 2.72 2. 59 1.75 1.66 1.81 1.86 1.31 1.98 2.01 1.63 1.84 1.48 1.62 1.72 C — EARNINGS AND HOURS 939 Table C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Industry Annual average 1 June2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Wholesale and retail trade—Continued Retail trade—Continued Furniture and appliance stores______ Furniture and home furnishings___ Eating and drinking places 6__________ Other retail trade___________________ Building materials and hardware____ Motor vehicle dealers______________ Other vehicle and accessory dealers__ Drug stores______________________ Fuel and ice dealers_______________ $88.82 $87.81 $88.09 $87.47 $88.82 $92. 75 88.88 87.47 87.30 86.24 88.03 91.98 46.51 46.31 46.31 46.38 46.17 46.23 84.80 84.61 84.00 83.41 83.82 84. 46 90.91 90.49 88.81 88.38 89.02 90.10 107.86 107.86 106.64 104.49 104. 54 106.09 88.94 87.03 86.76 86.76 87.16 86.24 61.88 61.54 61.02 61.58 61.23 63. 55 98.83 98.83 99.54 102.58 104.40 101. 05 $89.10 $89.15 $88. 75 88.13 88.18 87.56 45.49 46.02 45. 46 84.03 83.84 83.03 89. 25 90.52 89.89 106.33 105.22 102. 62 85.93 86.17 85. 41 61.93 61.94 62.65 99.49 98.21 94. 47 $88. 80 $89.02 $87. 42 87.78 87.82 86. 00 46.70 46.70 45. 67 84.46 85.08 83. 44 89.67 90.73 89.25 104.88 107. 31 106. 92 88. 20 87.16 86.60 63. 53 62.80 60.88 92. 77 93.02 93.02 $88.18 $85. 44 86.58 83.82 45. 76 44.38 83.23 80.34 88. 41 85.46 104. 88 100. 76 85.89 85. 41 61.42 59.76 96.05 93.09 Finance, insurance, and real estate7______ $92.13 92.63 92.50 91.76 92.00 91.63 90.88 90.27 89.65 89.04 88.91 89. 01 88.30 88. 77 Banking___________________ ______ 82.21 82.21 81.84 81.47 82.28 80.35 80.35 80.35 79.18 79.24 79.24 78.44 79.24 Credit agencies other than banks.............. 86. 56 86.03 85.50 86.26 87.32 85.28 84.67 84.67 84. 52 85. 50 84.36 82.88 84.29 Savings and loan associations________ 86.58 86.54 85.56 86.16 87.70 84.67 84.22 84.82 84.44 85.27 85.96 83. 48 84. 67 Security dealers and exchanges_________ 148.95 148.93 145.16 144. 02 139.13 138. 28 135. 72 131.89 124. 21 120.11 123. 33 124. 88 127. 43 Insurance carriers-................ — ________ 97.94 98.10 98.47 98. 74 97.73 96.87 96.49 95.86 95.86 95.86 95.74 94.74 95.12 Life insurance_____________________ 97.55 96.99 97. 72 97.99 97.15 96.05 95. 31 94.79 94. 54 94.79 94.79 94. 90 94.79 Accident and health insurance_______ 87.82 87.45 87.22 87.32 85.41 85. 38 85.24 84.50 83.68 84. 64 84. 41 84.18 84. 41 Fire, marine, and casualty insurance. __ 100.55 100.81 100.70 101.08 100.17 100.20 99.44 99.18 99.06 99. 06 98.94 96. 77 97.92 85.79 76.67 80.89 82.72 120.99 92.01 91,62 81.70 94. 75 Average weekly hours Wholesale and retail trade— Continued Retail trade—-Continued Furniture and appliance stores____ Furniture and home furnishings __ Eating and drinking places6________ Other retail trade_________________ Building materials and hardw are.-. Motor vehicle dealers____________ Other vehicle and accessory dealers . Drug stores____________________ Fuel and ice dealers_____________ Finance, insurance, and real estate7____ Banking_________________________ Credit agencies other than hanks____ Savings and loan associations______ Security dealers and exchanges______ Insurance carriers__________________ Life insurance___________________ Accident and health insurance_____ Fire, marine, and casualty insurance. 37.3 39.3 39.5 33.7 40.0 41.7 42.8 43.6 34.0 41.7 39.2 39.4 33.8 40.1 41.7 42.8 43.3 34.0 41.7 39.5 39.5 33.8 40.0 41.5 43.0 43.6 33.9 42.0 39.4 39.2 34.1 40.1 41.3 43.0 43.6 34.4 43.1 39.3 39.3 34.2 40.3 41.6 43.2 43.8 34.4 43.6 40.5 40.7 34.5 40.8 42.3 43.3 44.0 35.7 43.0 39.6 39.7 34.2 40.4 41.9 43.4 43.4 34.6 42.7 39.8 39.9 34.6 40.5 42.3 43.3 43.3 34.8 42.7 39.8 39.8 34.7 40.5 42.2 43.3 43.8 35.0 41.8 40.0 39.9 36.2 41.4 42.7 43.7 44.1 36.3 41.6 40.1 40.1 36.2 41.5 43.0 43.8 43.8 36.3 41.9 40.1 40.0 35.4 40.9 42.5 44.0 43.3 35.6 41.9 39.9 39.9 35.2 40.8 42.1 43.7 43.6 35.3 42.5 40.3 40.3 35.5 41.2 42.1 44.0 43.8 36.0 42.9 37.2 37.2 37.8 37.0 37.9 37.1 36.4 36.9 37.8 37.3 37.2 37.9 37.3 37.8 37.3 36.6 36.9 37.9 37.3 37.2 38.0 37.2 38.0 37.3 36.6 36.8 38.0 37.4 37.2 38.0 37.3 37.8 37.4 36.7 37.0 38.0 37.4 37.4 38.3 37.8 37.1 37.3 36.8 36.5 37.8 37.4 37.2 37.9 37.3 38.2 37.4 36.8 36.8 38.1 37.3 37.2 37.8 37.1 37.7 37.4 36.8 36.9 38.1 37.2 37.2 37.8 37.2 37.9 37.3 36.6 36.9 38.0 37.1 37.0 37.9 37.2 37.3 37.3 36.5 36.7 38.1 37.2 37.2 38.0 37.4 37.3 37.3 36.6 36.8 38.1 37.4 37.2 38.0 37.7 37.6 37.4 36.6 36.7 38.2 37.1 37.0 37.5 37.1 37.5 37.3 36.5 36.6 38.1 37.3 37.2 37.8 37.3 37.7 37.3 36.6 36.7 38.1 37.3 37.4 37.8 37.6 37.0 37.1 36.5 36.8 37.9 $2.22 2 . 20 $2.22 $2.18 2.15 1.29 2.04 $2.21 $2.12 2.17 1.30 2.04 2.08 1.25 1.95 2.03 2.29 1.95 I Average hourly earnings Wholesale and retail trade—Continued Retail trade—Continued Furniture and appliance stores___ Furniture and home furnishings _ Eating and drinking places 9_______ Other retail trade_______________ Building materials and hardw are... Motor vehicle dealers___________ Other vehicle and accessory dealers. D rugstores____________________ Fuel and ice dealers_____________ Finance, insurance, and real estate 7____ Banking__________________________ Credit agencies other than banks_____ Savings and loan associations______ Security dealers and exchanges______ Insurance carriers____ _____________ Life insurance__________________ Accident and health insurance_____ Fire, marine, and casualty insurance. See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis $2.47 $2.26 2.25 1.38 $2.24 $2.23 2.22 2. 21 1.37 2.12 2.11 1.37 2.10 2.18 2.52 2.04 1.82 2.37 2.17 2.52 1.81 2.37 2.14 2.48 1.99 1.80 2.37 2.49 2.48 2.46 2 .21 2.20 2.21 2.29 2.34 3.93 2.64 2.01 2.38 2.27 2.32 3.94 2.63 2.65 2.37 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.25 2.30 3.82 2.64 2.67 2.37 2.65 $2.22 2.20 1.36 2.08 2.14 2.43 1.99 1.79 2.38 $2.26 2.24 1.35 2.08 2.14 2.42 1.99 1.78 2.40 $2.29 2. 26 1.34 2.07 2.13 2. 45 1.96 1.78 2.35 $2. 25 $2.24 $2.23 2. 22 2.21 1.33 2.08 2.13 2.45 1.98 1.79 2.33 1.33 2.07 2.14 2.43 1.99 1.78 2.30 2.20 1.31 2. 05 2.13 2.37 1.95 1.79 2.26 2.46 2.19 2.27 2.31 3.81 2.64 2.67 2.36 2. 45 2.43 2.16 2. 25 2. 27 3.62 2.59 2. 61 2.32 2.63 2.42 2.16 2.24 2. 27 3. 60 2. 58 2. 59 2. 31 2. 61 2.41 2.16 2.24 2.28 3.48 2.57 2.59 2.29 2.61 2.40 2.14 2.23 2.27 3.33 2.57 2.59 2.28 2.60 2.66 2.20 2. 28 2.32 3. 75 2. 62 2.64 2: 34 2.65 1.29 2.04 2.19 1.29 2. 05 2.10 2.11 2.40 2.00 1.75 2.23 2.39 2.13 2.25 2. 28 3.22 2. 57 2.59 2.30 2.60 2. 45 1.99 1.73 2.10 2. 43 2.00 1.71 2.22 2.22 2. 38 2.13 2.38 2.22 2. 28 3.28 2. 56 2.59 2.30 2.59 2.12 2.21 2. 25 3.33 2. 54 2.60 2.30 2. 54 2.10 2.40 1.97 1. 74 2.26 2.38 2.13 2.23 2. 27 3. 38 2.55 2.59 2. 30 2. 57 1.66 2.17 2.30 2.05 2.14 2.20 3.27 2.48 2. 51 2.22 2. 50 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 940 T able C -l. Gross hours and earnings of production workers,1 by industry—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1965 1966 Annual average Industry Ju n e 2 M a y 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Average weekly earnings Services and miscellaneous: Hotels and lodging places: Hotels, tourist courts, and motels 6-----Personal services: Laundries, cleaning and dyeing plants 8. Motion pictures: Motion picture filming and distributing. $52.97 $52.36 $51.99 $52.08 $51.99 $52.36 $51. 99 $52.30 $51.65 $51. 74 $52.13 $50. 90 $51.17 $49. 54 61.06 60.04 59.82 59.06 59.44 59.68 58.83 60.14 59.06 58. 67 59.28 59.58 58. 98 55. 73 152.69 151.60 150.00 152. 74 157.56 160.37 155.63 161.18 152.88 157. 58 157.12 152. 36 151. 64 136.97 Average weekly hours Services and miscellaneous: Hotels and lodging places: Hotels, tourist courts, and m otels6........ Personal services: Laundries, cleaning and dyeing p lants8. Motion pictures: Motion picture filming and distributing. — 37.3 37.4 37.4 37.2 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.9 37.7 38.9 38.9 37.7 37.9 38.4 38.5 38.2 38.8 38.6 38.6 39.0 39.2 38.8 38.7 40.6 39.4 40.6 39.2 40.2 40.6 40.2 39.8 39.7 $1.29 38.4 38.0 38.1 38.1 38.1 40.5 40.0 40.0 40.3 40.4 Average hourly earnings Services and miscellaneous: Hotels and lodging places: Hotels, tourist courts, and m otels6-----Personal services: Laundries, cleaning and dyeing plan ts8. Motion pictures: Motion picture filming and distributing. $1.42 $1.40 $1.39 $1.40 $1.39 $1.40 $1.39 $1.38 $1.37 $1.33 $1.34 $1.35 $1.35 1.59 1.58 1.57 1.55 1.56 1.55 1.54 1.55 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.44 3. 77 3.79 3.75 3.79 3.9C 3.95 3.95 3.97 3.90 3.92 3.87 3.79 3. 81 3. 45 1 For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January 1966, see footnote 1, table A-2. For employees covered, see footnote 1, table A-3. 2 Preliminary. 3 Based upon m onthly data summarized in the M-300 report by the Inter state Commerce Commission, which relate to all employees who received pay during the m onth, except executives, officials, and staff assistants (ICC Group I). Beginning January 1965, data relate to railroads with operating revenues of $5,000,000 or more. 4 Data relate to nonsupervisory employees except messengers. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 5 Beginning January 1964, data include eating and drinking places. « Money payments only, tips not included. 7 Beginning January 1964, data on non-office salesmen excluded from all series in this division. 8 Beginning January 1964, data relate to nonsupervisory workers and are not comparable with production worker levels of prior years. S o u r c e : U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for all series except that for Class I railroads. (See footnote 3.) C.—EARNINGS AND HOURS T able 941 C-2. Average weekly hours, seasonally adjusted, of production workers in selected industries 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 1965 Industry division and group Ju n e 2 May 2 Apr. Mining____ _______________________ Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June ____________ 42.0 42.6 41.7 43.2 42.7 42.5 43.0 41.9 42.2 42.2 42.7 42.6 41.9 Contract construction_______________________________ 37.5 36.2 37.2 38.5 38.2 37.8 39.2 37.1 37.0 36.2 37.3 37.4 37.1 Manufacturing_____________________________________ 41.2 41.4 41.5 41.5 41.6 41.5 41.4 41.4 41.2 40.9 41.0 41.0 41.0 Durable goods__________________ _ _ ___________ Ordnance and accessories_______ ___ ______ Lumber and wood products, except furniture___ Furniture and fixtures______ _________________ Stone, clay, and glass products - - ________ _ .. Primary metal industries_______ . . . ____________ Fabricated metal products________ ______________ Machinery. ______ _ _________ _____ Electrical equipment and supplies___ ____ ______ Transportation equipm ent. . ________ ... Instruments and related products_____________ __ Miscellaneous manufacturing industries__ ____. . . 41.9 42.7 40.3 41.9 41.9 42.1 42.1 43.6 41.2 42.0 42.1 39.9 42.2 42.3 41.3 42.3 41.8 42.2 42.4 43.8 41.4 42.1 42.5 40.1 42.4 42.3 41.3 41.6 42.1 41.9 42.4 43.7 41.4 43.4 42.1 40.0 42.3 41.9 41.1 42.0 42.7 41.9 42.5 43.9 41.4 42.9 42.5 40.3 42.4 42.3 41.1 41.7 42.4 42.0 42.6 44.0 41.6 43.4 42.5 40.3 42.4 42.4 41.5 4L 7 42.7 41.9 42.6 43.9 41.5 43.5 42.2 40.0 42.2 42.4 41.8 41.8 43.0 41.2 42.3 43.9 41.5 42.9 41.7 40.2 42.2 42.2 41.3 41.7 42.2 41.1 42.4 43.7 41.3 43.4 41.7 40.2 42.0 42.3 41.1 41.5 41.8 41.4 42.3 43.5 41.0 43.0 41.7 40.0 41.6 41.9 40.5 40.9 41.9 41.8 41.6 43.0 40.5 41.8 41.5 39.8 41.7 42.1 40.7 41.3 41.8 42.1 41.7 42.7 40.8 42.2 41.3 40.0 41.7 42.7 40.5 41.3 41.7 42.4 41.8 42.9 40.6 42.3 41.3 39.7 41.8 41.8 39.9 41.4 41.6 42.1 42.0 43.0 41.0 42.9 41.4 39.6 Nondurable goods_____________ . . _________ Food and kindred products___________ _________ Tobacco manufactures___ ______________ .. _ ___ Textile mill products_____________ _________ ........... Apparel and related products......... ......... Paper and allied products. . . . . . ___________ Printing, publishing, and allied industries__________ Chemicals and allied products______ . . . . _____ Petroleum refining and related industries___ _ _____ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products______ Leather and leather products_____________________ 40.1 41.2 38.3 41.6 36.7 43.2 38.8 42.1 42.5 41.7 38.5 40.3 40.9 38.5 42.1 36.5 43.7 38.8 42.0 42.6 42.1 39.0 40.4 41.1 39.2 41.9 36.5 43.7 38.7 42.2 42.6 42.1 39.1 40.4 41.1 39.3 42.4 36.5 43.5 38.7 42.1 42.5 42.2 38.5 40.6 41.6 41.4 42.5 36.6 43.5 38.7 42.2 42.8 42.3 38.9 40.2 41.2 39.1 42.4 36.3 43.2 38.5 42.0 42.0 42.4 38.2 40.2 41.2 37.7 42.0 36.5 43.6 38.7 42.0 42.0 42.3 38.4 40.3 41.1 38.0 41.9 36.5 43.6 38.6 42.0 42.4 42.5 38.6 40.1 41.0 37.7 41.8 36.4 43.4 38.4 41.9 42.5 42.3 38.6 40.1 40.7 37.8 41.7 36.0 43.0 38.6 42.2 42.7 41.6 38.4 40.0 41.1 37.4 41.8 36.2 42.9 38.6 41.8 42.7 41.9 37.9 40.0 41.4 38.1 41.4 36.3 42.9 38.6 41.6 42.1 41.8 37.9 39.9 41.0 37.2 41.4 36.5 43.0 38.5 41.7 41.9 41.8 37.8 Wholesale and retail trade 3. . _____ _______ . . Wholesale trade__ _ ______ ___ _ . _________ Retail trade 3........ ... __ _ _______ 37.2 40.7 36.0 37.1 40.7 36.0 37.1 40.7 35.9 37.2 40.9 36.0 37.3 41.0 36.1 37.4 41.0 36.2 37.5 40.9 36.4 37.4 40.8 36.3 37.5 40.9 36.4 37.5 40.8 36.5 37.8 41.0 36.7 37.8 40.7 36.8 37.7 40.8 36.6 1 For employees covered, see footnote 1> table A-3. 2 Preliminary. 3 Beginning January 1964, data include eating and drinking places. T able N ote: The seasonal adjustment method used is described in “ New Seasonal Adjustment Factors for Labor Force Components,” Monthly Labor Review, August 1960, pp. 822-827. C-3. Average hourly earnings excluding overtime of production workers in manufacturing, by major industry group 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 Annual average 1965 Major industry group Ju n e2 May 2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 $2.58 $2.58 $2.58 $2. 56 $2.56 $2.56 $2.54 $2.53 $2.52 $2.51 $2.49 $2. 50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.44 Durable goods._. _ _ ________ . . . 2.74 Ordnance and accessories. . . . . . . Lumber and wood products, except furniture. . . . ... Furniture and fixtures . . ... Stone, clay, and glass products_______ Primary metal industries___________ Fabricated metal products . ______ Machinery_____’ ___ ______ . . . _ Electrical equipment and supplies.. . Transportation equipm ent.. _ _____ Instruments and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing indus tries__________. _____ . _ __ _ 2.74 3.03 2.74 3.02 2.72 3.03 2.72 3.02 2.72 3. 03 2.70 3. 05 2.69 3. 02 2.68 3. 02 2.68 3. 00 2.65 3. 01 2. 67 3.01 2.67 3.00 2.67 3.01 2.60 2.95 2.15 2. 09 2.57 3.13 2.71 2.89 2.52 3.12 2.57 2.12 2.08 2.57 3.13 2.71 2 88 2.53 3.11 2.58 2.08 2.07 2.55 3.11 2.70 2. 87 2.51 3.11 2. 56 2.09 2.06 2.55 3.09 2.68 2.86 2.52 3.11 2.55 2. 07 2.06 2.54 3.10 2.68 2.86 2.52 3.11 2. 55 2.08 2.05 2. 54 3.08 2. 67 2.84 2.51 3.10 2.54 2.10 2. 05 2.54 3.06 2.66 2. 84 2.51 3.09 2.53 2.10 2.05 2.53 3.06 2.65 2.83 2.50 3.07 2.52 2.11 2. 05 2. 51 3. 06 2.64 2.82 2. 50 3.07 2. 51 2.10 2. 03 3. 03 2. 62 2. 79 2. 49 3.01 2. 52 2.09 2.03 2.49 3.05 2.63 2. 79 2. 50 3.02 2. 52 2.09 2.02 2.49 3.04 3.63 2. 79 2. .50 3.03 2.53 2.07 2.03 2.49 3.04 2.63 2.80 2. 50 3.04 2. 52 2.03 1.97 2.42 2.99 2. 57 2.75 2. 44 2.96 2.47 2.13 2 13 2.12 2.13 2.13 2.08 2.06 2.05 2. 05 2. 05 2. 08 2. 07 2.06 2.02 2. 21 2.27 1.92 1.71 1.76 2.43 Manufacturing________ __ _ . . . Nondurable goods.. . . _____ Food and kindred products____ . . . _ Tobacco manufactures . _ _______ Textile mill products__ Apparel and related products . . _ . Paper and allied products.. _ _ _____ Printing, publishing, and allied indus tries___. . . ____ _ _ ___________ Chemicals and allied products _.. Petroleum refining arid related indus tries__ ._ _ _ . . . ___ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products_________ . . . . . . . Leather and leather products________ 2.34 2.33 2.42 2.24 1.83 1.83 2.56 2.33 2 42 2 24 1 83 1 83 2. 56 2.31 2. 40 2.19 1.82 1. 84 2. 55 2.31 2.38 2.17 1.82 1.84 2.54 2.31 2.38 2.14 1.82 1.82 2. 54 2. 30 2.36 2.09 1.81 1.82 2. 53 2.29 2.33 2. 09 1.81 1. 82 2.52 2.28 2.31 1.95 1.80 1.82 2.51 2.28 2.31 1.95 1.80 1.82 2.52 2. 26 2. 29 2.03 1.80 1.79 2. 51 2. 27 2.30 2.17 1. 79 1.79 2. 51 2.26 2.33 2.17 1.76 1.78 2.49 2.27 2.32 2.07 1.78 1.79 2.50 (») (8) 2.84 (3) 2 82 (3) 2 81 (3) 2.83 (3) 2.83 0 2. 83 (3) 2. 83 (3) 2.82 (3) 2.82 (3) 2.80 (3) 2.80 (3) 2.78 (3) 2. 79 (3) 2.72 3.28 3 29 3.27 3.28 3.28 3. 27 3. 27 3.20 3.16 3.12 3.13 3.12 3.17 3.10 2. 51 1.82 2.48 1.84 2.49 1.84 2. 44 1.78 2.52 1.89 2 52 1.89 2. 51 1.87 1 For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January 1966, see footnote 1, table A-2. For employees covered, see footnote 1, table A-3. Average hourly earnings excluding overtime are derived by assuming that overtime hours are paid for at the rate of time and one-half. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2 .4 9 2. 51 1.86 2. 51 1.86 21 51 1.86 2. 50 1.85 2.51 1.85 2.50 1.85 2.49 1.83 3 Preliminary. 3 Not available because average overtime rates are significantly above time and one-half. Inclusion of data for the group in the nondurable goods total has little effect. M O N T H L Y L A B O R R E V I E W , A U G U S T 1966 942 T able C-4. Average weekly overtime hours of production workers in manufacturing, by industry 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. Annual average 1965 1966 Industry Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 4.0 4.3 3.4 3.9 4.3 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.1 4.0 4.4 3.4 3.9 4.3 3.4 3.9 4.2 3.4 3.8 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.1 3.6 4.0 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.1 3.3 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.0 5.2 3.6 3.0 3.5 5.2 3.3 2.8 3.4 4.5 3.5 3.2 3.7 4.4 3.8 3.8 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.4 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.9 3.7 3.6 2.5 4.1 3.4 3.3 1.8 3.9 3.3 3.5 2.0 3.1 3.3 3.5 1.1 3.2 2.8 3.0 1.4 2. 5 2.9 3.0 1.6 2. 9 1.8 1.8 1.3 2. 0 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.7 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3. 4 3.4 4.7 4.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.2 4.8 4.1 5.0 2.9 4.1 2.6 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.4 3.3 4.5 3.6 3.4 4.6 4.8 4.0 2.7 3.7 2.5 4.1 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.6 4.4 4.0 3.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 2.7 3.6 2.3 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 4.5 3.6 3.2 4.0 4.3 4.3 2.3 3.1 2.4 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.3 4.1 3.5 3.0 3.9 4.3 4.0 2.5 3.3 2.3 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.4 4. 2 4.7 4.2 4.2 3.4 4. 2 1.9 3.6 2.4 4.4 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.1 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 5.6 4.4 2.2 3.7 2.6 4.3 4.5 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.9 3.9 4.6 4.9 4.2 1.9 3.8 2.6 4.1 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.7 4.2 4.8 3.9 4.6 5.0 4.6 2.9 4.2 2.7 4.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.5 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.7 3.3 4.1 2.4 4.0 2.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.7 4.1 3.9 3.6 4.5 3.5 4.1 2.5 3.9 1.9 4.2 3.8 3. ô 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.6 4.4 4.3 3.7 4.0 2.2 3.8 2.3 4. 0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.2 4.1 4.0 2.2 3.6 2.2 3.6 2.8 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.5 2.4 3.1 3.9 3.7 3.6 2.1 3.3 2.0 6.7 4.3 4.1 2.9 5.1 4.2 6.8 4.3 4.1 2.8 5.6 3.9 6.3 4.0 3.9 2.4 5.6 3.6 5.0 4.0 3.9 2.3 5.6 3.5 5.3 3.4 3.6 1.8 5.1 3.2 6.0 3.8 3.5 1. 5 5.5 3.5 6.3 3.9 3.4 1.4 5.6 3.6 6.8 4.0 3.4 1.6 5.7 3.5 6.3 3.7 3.8 2.5 5.7 4.1 7.4 3.8 3.7 2.8 5.1 3.3 7.0 3.6 3.9 3.2 5.2 3.3 6.6 3.6 4.1 3.2 5.9 3.6 6. 2 3.5 3.8 2.7 5.5 3.5 5.9 3.3 3.2 2.4 4.7 3.1 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.6 5.8 4.5 5.9 4.5 6.0 4.7 5.9 4.7 5.4 4.2 5.4 4.0 5.8 3.4 5.1 3.5 4.8 3.2 5.4 3.8 5. 0 3.9 3.9 3.2 6.0 4.6 4.9 5.4 4.3 4.4 6.2 4.2 3.8 6.3 4.2 4.0 6.2 4.1 3.4 6.1 4.4 2.9 6.1 4.4 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.6 5.6 4.2 4.3 4.9 4.0 5.0 5.3 3.8 5.0 4.8 4.1 4.6 5. 2 4.0 4.5 4.0 3.4 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.8 3.0 3. 4 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.9 5.5 5.0 4.6 2.6 3.6 6.7 5.3 4.8 4.0 2.4 3.5 6.8 5.3 4.8 4.1 2.5 3.4 6.9 5.1 4.7 4.4 2.1 3.4 6.6 5.3 4.3 4.0 2.7 4.0 6.8 5.6 4.8 4.1 2.7 4.0 6.1 5.8 4.7 4.4 3.2 4.4 5. 9 5.5 4.7 4.4 2.9 4.1 5. 4 5.0 4.6 3.7 2.5 4.0 5.1 4.7 4.0 3.9 2.4 3.7 4.8 4.9 3.8 3.4 2.8 3.9 5. 4 5.3 4.2 3.9 2.3 3.6 5. 4 5.2 4.3 3.8 2.2 3.0 4.3 4.5 3.8 3.1 4.5 5.7 5.7 4.3 5.3 3.9 5.6 5.8 4.4 5.1 4.3 5.7 5.4 4.3 5.1 4.1 5.6 4.4 4.0 5.0 3.7 5.3 3.9 3.7 4.5 3.8 5.5 4.9 3.7 4.7 3.8 5.0 4.0 2.8 4.4 3.8 4.9 4.4 2.9 4.7 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.2 3.4 4.4 4.1 2.5 4.1 3.0 4.5 4.0 2.6 4.4 3.6 4.8 4.0 2.8 4.4 3.4 4.6 4.1 2.9 4. 2 2.7 3.9 3.1 2.6 3.5 8.4 5.5 5.6 8.0 5.3 5.1 8.2 5.6 5.2 8.0 5.6 5.3 7.6 5.4 5.1 7.6 5.8 5.4 7. 0 5.3 5.0 6.4 5.1 4.8 6.1 4.8 4.7 6.0 4.4 4.4 6.3 4.3 4.2 6.9 5.0 4.7 6. 7 4.8 4.4 5.9 4.1 3.5 3.9 3.4 6.3 3.5 3.9 4.7 3.8 3.1 2.0 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.2 6.3 3.3 3.5 4.5 3.7 2.8 2.4 3.0 3.3 4.2 3.5 6.3 3.3 3.7 4.4 2.9 2.7 2.3 3.3 3.4 4.6 3.3 6.2 3.4 3.4 4.3 3.6 2.9 2.3 3.4 3.5 4.9 3.0 6.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 3.3 2.8 2.3 3.6 2.9 5.0 3.2 6.1 3.6 3.8 4.2 4.4 3.1 3.0 3.9 3.1 4.3 3.0 5.8 3. 4 3.4 3. 7 3.8 3.2 3. 0 3.4 3.0 4.0 3.2 5.6 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.9 3.1 3.1 3.3 2.6 3.6 2.9 4.8 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.3 2.8 2.9 3.0 5.2 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 3.0 5.2 2.3 3.1 3.4 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.7 3.7 5.5 2.8 3.2 3.9 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.6 3. 4 2.9 5.3 2.8 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.7 2. 3 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 4.7 2.3 2.6 3.0 2.2 2.1 1. 7 2.2 2.1 3.0 4.3 4.0 5,0 4.0 3.6 3.0 3.8 4.2 3.0 5.1 5.8 4.6 4.2 3.7 2.9 3.5 3.7 3.0 4.7 4.7 5.1 4.4 3.0 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.5 4.8 5.3 5.0 3.8 2.9 2.0 3.7 4.2 3.2 5.1 5.5 5.6 3.8 3.0 2.0 3.5 3.9 4. 1 5.7 6.9 4.9 3.6 3.2 2.6 3.6 4.5 4. 0 6.0 7.4 4.9 3.8 2. 5 2.9 3.5 4.0 3.6 5.4 6.6 4.0 4.1 2.2 3.7 3.5 3.8 2.9 4.4 5.0 3.7 3.9 2.6 3.8 3.4 3.9 2.6 4.1 4.8 3.6 3.0 2.4 3.5 2.9 3.2 2.3 4.2 5.3 3.2 2.9 1.9 3.1 2.8 3.3 2.9 4.8 6.1 2.9 3.6 2.6 3.7 2.9 3.3 3. 2 4.8 6.2 3.3 3.4 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.9 5.0 2.5 3.1 2.8 3.2 2.4 2.3 4.3 3.2 2.9 4.0 2.2 2.1 3.7 3.3 2.9 4.0 3.2 2.7 4.0 2.8 2.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 3.4 2.8 2.5 3.5 2.9 2.4 3.4 2.9 2.6 3.1 2.3 1.8 3.0 2.5 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.4 2. 9 2.7 2.4 2. 5 2.4 2.1 2.8 4.9 2.4 2.7 4.9 2.5 2.7 4.7 2.8 2.4 5.0 2.6 2.5 4.3 2.5 3.0 4.6 3.2 2.7 4.8 3.1 2.5 4.8 3.0 2.3 4.5 2.7 2.2 1.7 3.4 3.5 2.9 1 2.4 2.1 3.9 2.1 2.1 4.0 2. 4 2. 0 3.2 June 2 May 2 Apr. Manufacturing_____ - - --------Durable goods ___ -- - ----------Nondurable goods--------------------------Durable goods 4.0 4.3 3.5 Ammunition except tor small arms Sighting and fire control equipm ent— Other ordnance and accessories............. Lumber and wood products, except furniture _ __ -- Sawmills and planing mills--------------Millwork, plywood, and related prodnets - - - - ___ — Wooden containers------ -- --------------Miscellaneous wood products-----------Furniture find fixtures ___ Household furniture _ __ Gffice furniture _ ___ Partitions; office and store fixtures-----Other furniture and fixtures _ __ __ Stone clay anti glass products _ ___ Flat glass _ _ __ fipmpnt hydraulic __ __ Structural clay products _ _ ____ Pottery and related products------------Concrete, gypsum, and plaster prodnets _________ Other stone and mineral products-----Primary metal industries ____ _ Iron and steel foundries ______ Nonferrous smelting and refining------Nonferrous rolling, drawing, and extruding Nonferrous foundries _ __ Miscellaneous primary metal industries __ - ______ Fabricated metal products _ __ _ Metal cans Cutlery, handtools, and general hardware _ _ Heating equipment and plumbing fixtures Fabricated structural metal products.._ Screw machine products, bolts, etc___ Metal stampings Coating, engraving, and allied services. Miscellaneous fabricated wire products. Miscellaneous fabricated metal prod__ nets _ ___ Machinery _ _ __ Engines and turbines . . . . ___ Farm machinery and equipment Hon struct ion and related machinery Metalworking machinery and equipment - - _ _ __ Special industry machinery General industrial machinery Office, computing, and accounting machines ___ Service industry machines Miscellaneous maohinerv Electrical equipment, and supplies Electric distribution equipment Electrical industrial apparatus . . Household appliances Electric lighting and wiring equipment. Radio and TV receiving sets Gommnnication equipment Electronic components and accessories. Miscellaneous electrical equipment and supplies Transportation equipment Motor vehicles and equipment__ _ Aircraft and parts Ship and boat, building and repairing Railroad equipment Other transportation equipm ent_____ instruments and related products Engineering and scientific instruments Mechanical measuring and control devices Optical and ophthalmic goods Ophthalmic goods Surgical, medical, and dental equipment Photographic equipment and supplies Watches and clocks. ______________ See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis __ O.—EARNINGS AND HOURS T able C-4. 943 Average weekly overtime hours of production workers in manufacturing, by industry 1—Continued Revised series; see box, p. 922. 1966 Annual average 1965 Industry Ju n e 2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. M anufacturing—C ontinued Durable goods—Continued 3.1 2.9 2.8 Miscellaneous manufacturing in d u stries.-------4.1 4.1 4.3 Jewelry, silverware, and plated w a r e ... ........... 2.7 2.6 2.6 Toys, amusement and sporting goods.. -....... 2.4 2.2 2.0 Pens, pencils, office and art m aterials........... ~ 3.1 3.0 2.7 Costume jewelry, buttons, and n o tio n s.-------3.1 2.9 2.8 Other manufacturing industries-------- --------3.1 3.2 2.8 Musical instruments and parts-------- --------Nondurable goods 3.7 3.4 3.4 Food and kindred products______ ___________ 3.8 3.4 3.5 Meat products--------- ------- ----------- -----------3.7 3.4 3.4 Dairy products_________________ _________ Canned and preserved food, except 3.0 2.8 2.8 meats________________ ________________ 6.2 5.6 5.5 Grain mill products__________ ____________ 3.6 3.1 3.3 Bakery products_________ _____ ___ ______ 4.0 4.6 3.5 Sugar_______________ ____________ ______ 2.2 2.6 2.0 Confectionery and related products--------------3.4 3.1 3.6 Beverages------ -------------------------------—......... 4.1 3.9 3.8 Miscellaneous food and kindred products.-------1.0 1.2 1.3 Tobacco manufactures------- ------- ------------------.9 1.2 1.6 Cigarettes------------ ------------------------ ---------1.1 1.3 1.1 Cigars------- ------ ---------------------------- --------4.6 4.7 4.5 Textile mill products_________________ ______ 5. 5 5.4 5.3 Cotton broad woven fabrics-------------- --------5.7 6.0 5.5 Silk and synthetic broad woven fabrics.-------5.1 5.5 5.3 Weaving and finishing broad w oolens..-------4.4 3.9 3.9 Narrow fabrics and smallwares_____________ 2. 5 2.9 2.2 Knitting............ .................... .................. ............. 5.8 5.5 5.7 Finishing textiles, except wool and k n i t . -------4.4 4.4 4.2 Floor covering___________________________ 5.2 5.0 5.2 Yam and thread____________________ — 4.8 5.2 5.0 Miscellaneous textile goods................................. 1.6 1.5 1.4 Apparel and related products.................. 1.6 1.7 1.4 M en’s and boys’ suits and coats____________ 1.3 1.3 1.2 M en’s and boys’ furnishings_______________ 1.8 1.5 1.4 Women’s, misses’, juniors’ o u terw ear............Women’s and children’s undergar 1.7 1.5 1.3 ments__________ __________ _____ ______ 1.9 1.0 1.0 Hats, caps, and millinery........... ........................ 1. 5 1.6 1.4 Girls’ and children’s outerwear_______- --___ 1.3 1.6 1.2 Fur goods and miscellaneous a p p a re l......... . Miscellaneous fabricated textile prod 2.0 2.0 1.9 ucts_______________________ ___________ 5.3 5.6 Paper and allied products_________________ _ 5.3 6.2 6.7 Paper and p u lp ._________________________ 6.2 7.5 7.9 8.2 Paperboard_______________________ ______ Converted paper and paperboard 3.9 3.9 products__________________ _____ ____ _ 3.8 4.8 4.9 4.5 Paperboard containers and boxes........ -........Printing, publishing, and allied indus 3.5 3.4 3.3 trie s..______________ ___________ ______ 2.3 Newspaper publishing and printing-------------2.9 2.6 4.1 3.5 3.7 Periodical publishing and printing----- ---------5.1 5.5 5.1 Books_______________________ ___________ 3.9 3.7 3.6 Commercial printing_______________ ______ 3.0 2.8 3.0 Bookbinding and related industries---- ---------Other publishing and printing indus 3.6 2.8 tries_______________ ____________ ______ 2.6 3.3 3.7 3.5 Chemicals and allied products_______________ 3.2 3.4 3.2 Industrial chemicals______________________ 3.0 3.3 3.6 Plastics materials and synthetics_____ ______ 2.9 3.0 2.8 Drugs___ _______________________________ 3.0 3.0 2.9 Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods.......................... 2.6 3.4 3.9 Paints, varnishes, and allied p ro d u c ts..-------7.3 8.8 6.6 Agricultural chemicals_______ _____ _______ 2.8 3.1 3.5 Other chemical products____________ ____ _ Petroleum refining and related indus tries__________________________________ 2.6 3.5 3.4 2.3 Petroleum refining_________________ ______ 3.0 3.0 3.9 Other petroleum and coal products.................... 5.1 4.6 4.2 Rubber, miscellaneous plastic products_______ 4.4 4.2 Tires and inner tubes_____________________ 5.8 6.8 6.6 Other rubber products____________________ 3.5 3.5 3.4 4.1 Miscellaneous plastic products_____________ 4.0 3.8 Leather and leather products_________ _______ 2.1 2.1 1.9 Leather tanning and finishing______________ 3.5 4.1 3.5 Footwear, except rubber_________ _____ ___ 1.9 1.8 1.6 Other leather products_____________ ___ _ 2.1 2.2 2.1 _____Handbags and personal leather goods_______ 2.0 1.9 2.5 1 For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January K)66, see footnote 1, table A-2. For employees covered, see footnote 1, table These series cover premium overtime hours of production and related workers during the pay period which includes the 12th of the month. Over time hours are those paid for at premium rates because (1) they exceeded https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Feb. Jan. 2.8 3.7 2.5 2.1 3.0 2.9 3.5 2.7 3.6 2.4 1.8 2.7 2.8 2.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 3.1 5.2 2.8 3.2 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.2 4.8 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 4.2 3.3 4.9 3.3 3.0 2.7 3.1 4.0 3.0 3.8 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.9 3.2 2.7 3.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.6 3.2 2.6 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.7 3. 6 2. 6 2.3 2.5 2. 7 3.0 2.4 3.3 2.1 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.1 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.8 4.3 3.3 3.9 4.9 3.3 4.0 4.4 3.5 4.2 5.0 3.9 3.8 4.1 3.6 4.1 4.4 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.2 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.5 3.4 6.3 3.2 4.5 2.4 2.8 4.4 1.9 2.9 1.2 4.6 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.5 2.3 5.5 4.7 5.4 4.9 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.5 2.6 6.0 3.1 3.4 2.5 2.7 4.0 .9 .6 1.2 4.3 5.4 4.8 4.7 4.1 2.1 5.1 4.0 5.2 4.8 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.2 2.7 6.9 3.3 3.7 2.7 3.2 4.5 1.3 .9 1.2 4.6 5.3 5.5 4.6 4.2 2.4 5.6 6.3 5.1 5.3 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.2 2.8 6.2 3.4 4.1 2.7 3.3 4.9 1.1 .6 2.0 4.6 5.4 5.5 4.1 4.1 2.7 5.4 6.2 5.2 5.1 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.3 2.9 7.5 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 4.7 1.3 1.0 1.7 4.5 5.0 5.3 4.1 4.1 3.0 4.8 5.6 5.0 5.1 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.3 3.2 8.0 3.6 5.2 3.4 3.4 4.5 1.5 .7 1.3 4.5 5.3 5.7 4.7 3.5 2.9 4.5 5.7 4.9 4.8 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.2 3.0 7.5 3.4 4.6 2.9 3.6 4.2 1.2 .7 1.4 4.3 4.7 5.4 4.5 3.4 2.8 4.5 6.3 5.0 4.1 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.4 2.9 8.1 3.6 4.5 1.9 4.3 4.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 3.8 4.1 5.0 4.7 3.2 2.5 3.9 4.4 4.6 3.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 3.1 6.3 3.6 3.8 1.8 4.0 4.1 .9 .6 1.3 4.2 4.6 5.4 4.7 3.5 2.6 4.9 4.9 4.5 4.4 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.2 2.9 6. 5 3.3 4.0 2.4 3.3 4.3 1.1 .8 1.3 4.2 4.8 5.3 4.4 3.6 2.5 4.6 5.1 4.7 4.3 1.4 1. 5 1.2 1.3 2.8 6.3 3.1 3.7 2.2 3.1 4.0 1.6 1.6 2.1 3.6 4.3 5.0 3.4 3.1 2.1 4.2 4.4 3.6 3.6 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.9 .8 1.6 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.8 5.1 6.2 7.0 1.7 5.0 6.1 7.5 2.2 5.5 6.2 7.7 2.9 5.6 6.3 7.6 2.6 5.7 6.4 7.9 2.1 5.7 6.6 8.4 1.6 5.2 5.9 7.7 2.1 5.0 6.0 7.2 1.9 5.0 5.9 6.7 2.1 5.0 6.0 7.0 1.9 4.7 5.7 6.3 3.7 4.5 3.5 4.2 4.0 5.2 4.0 5.4 4.0 5.6 3.7 5.2 3.6 4.8 3.5 4.2 3.5 4.6 3.5 4.5 3.3 4.1 3.0 2.0 3.7 4.4 3.5 2.4 2.8 1.9 3.4 4.3 3.1 2.2 3.6 3.2 3.1 4.6 3.9 2.5 3.2 2.7 3.4 4.2 3.5 2.5 3.4 2.8 4.4 4.3 3.6 2.6 3.4 2.6 4.8 4.9 3.8 2.6 3.2 2.3 3.4 5.6 3.3 2.5 2.8 2.3 3.2 3.9 3.1 2.2 2.9 2.5 2.7 4.0 3.0 2.6 3.1 2.4 3.8 4.2 3.4 2.5 2.9 2.4 4.0 3.8 3.1 2.4 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.5 4.7 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.2 4.1 2.9 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.2 3.2 2.3 4.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 3. 0 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.4 3.5 3.2 3.4 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.6 3.6 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.6 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.8 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.3 3.0 3.6 3.3 2.7 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.7 4.9 3. (! 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.0 2.5 2.5 4.6 3.0 2.4 2.0 3.8 4.4 6.7 3.6 3.9 2.4 3.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 1.9 4.2 4.4 6.8 3.7 3.9 2.1 3.3 1.9 2.2 1. 7 Dec. 2.6 2.9 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 2.5 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.1 1.8 2.5 2.1 4.0 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.9 5.0 7.3 6.5 5.5 4.7 4.6 4.8 4.3 4.1 3.4 4.1 3.7 4.1 6.7 6.5 7.4 6.6 6.3 4.3 6.2 5.9 6.1 4.1 4.0 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.3 3.2 2.7 2.7 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.4 3.7 4.0 3.9 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 3.6 4. 0 3.5 3.2 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.5 3.3 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 2.8 2.6 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 either the straight-time workday or workweek or (2) they occurred on week ends or holidays or outside regularly scheduled hours. Hours for which only shift differential, hazard, incentive, or other similar types of premiums were paid are excluded. 2 Preliminary. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 944 T able C—5. Indexes of aggregate weekly man-hours and payrolls in industrial and construction activities 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [1957-59=100] Annual average 1965 1966 Activity June2 M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Nov. Dec. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 Man-hours T o ta l..............— ....................— .................Mining......... .............................. ........ ........... Contract construction................................... M anufacturing................. ............................. 118.3 85.6 127.6 118.2 114.4 83.4 113.5 116.2 111.9 73.8 108.5 114.5 111.3 109.0 81.0 79.6 103.5 93.6 114.2 113.3 108.4 80.8 98.9 111.5 112.3 83.5 109.8 114.2 112.5 82.2 114.2 113.7 113.8 83.9 124.1 113.5 112.9 82.6 121.4 112.9 85.9 130. 5 112.8 111.0 110.8 111.2 85.0 84.6 125.5 121.0 109.4 110.7 109.0 82.5 111.3 109.9 103.1 82.6 105.4 103.8 121.9 144.2 120.6 119.4 141.5 140.0 117.9 137.2 119.8 130.5 118.4 131.0 117.5 129.1 116.0 125.5 112.9 120.7 113.2 119.2 115.4 116.2 114.0 120.4 105.5 120.9 94.0 95.2 120.7 104.1 109.8 98.0 126.4 107.7 107.6 122.7 129.5 140.0 117.4 119. 0 98.3 124.0 109.7 105.0 100.3 124.2 110.7 106.9 100.5 103.1 100.7 116.3 110.7 115.8 115.0 97.0 119.0 107.0 112. 5 116.4 125.5 136.2 115.9 118.0 123.8 133.4 112.7 116.7 100.5 118.4 109.6 117.1 118.2 123.3 125.6 107 9 Durable goods............................................ Ordnance and accessories...... ................ Lumber and wood products, except furniture-------- ---------------------------Furniture and fixtures______________ Stone, clay, and glass products_______ Primary metal industries.____ _____ Fabricated metal products......... ........... Machinery___________ ____________ Electrical equipment and supplies........ Transportation equipment_____ _____ Instruments and related products____ Miscellaneous manufacturing indus tries__________ ____ _____________ 125.1 153.8 123.5 150.0 103.5 127.7 114.6 118.7 126.9 136.4 147.7 115.3 127.1 101.2 98.0 124.4 122.0 111.6 109.7 116.3 125.3 134.8 144.8 116.4 125.4 117.2 115.4 Nondurable goods___________________ Food and kindred products_________ Tobacco manufactures.____ ________ Textile mill products_____ __________ Apparel and related products________ Paper and allied products----------------Printing, publishing, and allied in dustries_________________________ Chemicals and allied products_______ Petroleum refining and related indus tries____________________________ Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products________________________ Leather and leather products________ 109.2 91.9 72.3 106.6 116.7 106.7 87.5 69.8 105.8 118.9 114.0 116.1 116.0 115.4 123.2 132.9 142.5 117.4 95.6 123.7 106.6 113.1 122.3 132.9 140.4 116.5 123.0 121.6 103.3 111.7 121.6 120.2 122.1 121.6 112.1 112.3 122.1 120.8 113.0 118.6 122.3 129.5 106 9 115.7 114.0 116.5 95.5 111.6 105.0 106.0 107.8 111.9 113.2 94.9 104.4 131.4 140.5 115.7 121.8 129.0 138.3 114.9 119.5 111.3 108.5 102.7 116.3 123.0 124.0 119.2 122.0 120.0 121.6 126.3 122.6 107.1 103.2 111.6 112.0 111.8 116.0 105.5 109.1 110.6 104.9 105.8 105.3 107.7 97.7 86.4 104.7 117.2 112.7 101.0 102.8 108.7 103.9 103.0 108.5 103.2 89.8 104.5 97.5 72.1 99.5 104.6 91.7 72.7 102.3 116.0 112.6 74.6 81.1 105.0 104.1 120.4 118.7 112.1 110.9 106.9 93.1 90.4 104.1 115.6 113.7 108.2 71.6 103.1 115.9 103.2 87.6 80.9 102.3 110.3 110.3 104.6 93.4 83.3 101.3 114.8 109. 5 101.5 93.8 91.6 96.7 109.1 106.7 114.7 115.1 113.7 115.2 113.7 112.5 112.5 110.7 110.4 109.3 114.3 110.1 112.3 109.9 111.9 109.2 111.1 110.6 111.7 110.5 108.9 109.9 109.0 110.1 109.8 109. 5 106.4 105. 9 81.4 78.4 76.5 73.4 73.7 74.4 76.3 78.0 81.1 80.1 80.3 78.4 76.7 78.5 145.3 143.1 99.9 141.0 97.3 140.4 139.5 100.4 102.5 140.1 99.6 142.9 101.4 140.7 98.6 138.4 96.0 136.0 96.7 134.3 99.8 129.8 97.3 132.8 97.4 133.2 97.1 121.5 94.9 97.4 99.4 151.2 165.3 142.4 141.4 97.2 160.7 140.3 100.5 170.2 136.1 98.3 162.0 135.1 99.1 156.8 136.7 96.5 145. 3 135.9 93.0 132. 5 124. 2 121.8 102.6 122.2 112.0 86.0 86.2 86.8 74.2 103.8 117.2 112.5 125.5 95.2 113.2 102.2 102.8 116.8 118.2 111.6 111.8 111.2 109.7 110.2 103. 0 Payrolls M ining.___________ Contract construction. Manufacturing.......... . 105.0 172.5 151.2 102.4 153.5 148.4 86.9 146.2 146.1 97.1 95.9 139.0 126.4 144.7 143.2 1For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January 1966, see footnote 1, table A-2. For mining and manufacturing, data refer to production and related T able C-6. 96.9 132.5 140.8 99.4 146.5 143.8 workers and for contract construction, to construction workers, as defined in footnote 1, table A-3. 2 Preliminary. Gross and spendable average weekly earnings of production workers in manufacturing 1 Revised series; see box, p. 922. [in current and 1957-59 dollars]1 Annual average 1965 1966 Item M ay2 Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June May 1965 1964 Manufacturing Gross average weekly earnings: 53 $102.97 Current dollars___________ __ _____ $112. 05 $111.24 $110.95 $110.27 $110.00 $110.92 $109. 71 $108.62 $107.83 $106.45 $107.01 $107.79 $107.53 $107. 97.84 95.25 1957-59 dollars_______________________ 99. 51 98.88 99.06 98.81 99.10 99.93 99. 20 98.39 97.85 96.77 97.11 97.90 98.11 Spendable average weekly earnings: Worker with no dependents: 40 Current dollars___ . _ _ _ . __ 91.35 90.73 90. 51 90.00 89.79 91.80 90.83 89.95 89.32 88.21 88.66 89.29 89.08 89.08 84. 78.08 1957-59 dollars_____________________ 81.13 80.65 80.81 80.65 80.89 82. 70 82.12 81.48 81.05 80.19 80.45 81.10 81.28 81. 06 Worker with 3 dependents: 99.22 98.57 98.34 97.80 97.58 99.62 98. 61 97.69 97.03 95.87 96.34 96.99 96.78 96.78 92.18 Current dollars _ __ _ ____ . ____ 85.27 1957-59 dollars_____________________ 88.12 87. 62 87.80 87. 63 87.91 89. 75 89.16 88.49 88.05 87.15 87.42 88.09 88.30 88. 06 1For comparability of data with those published in issues prior to January 1966, see footnote 1, table A-2. For employees covered, see footnote 1, table A-3. Spendable average weekly earnings are based on gross average weekly earnings as published in table C -l less the estimated amount of the workers’ Federal social security and income tax liability. Since the amount of tax liability depends on the number of dependents supported by the worker as well as on the level of his gross income, spendable earnings have been com https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis puted for 2 types of income receivers: (1) A worker with no dependents, and (2 ) a worker with 3 dependents. . . The earnings expressed in 1957-59 dollars have been adjusted for changes in purchasing power as measured by the Bureau’s Consumer Price Index. 2 Preliminary. N o t e : These series are described i n “ The Calculation and Uses of the Spendable Earnings Series,” Monthly Labor Review, April 1966, pp. 406-410. D.—CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES 945 D.—Consumer and Wholesale Prices T able D - l . Consumer Price Index 1—U.S. city average for urban wage earners and clerical workers all items, groups, subgroups, and special groups of items [1957-59=100 unless otherwise specified] 1966 1965 A nnual average G ro u p Ju n e M ay A p r. M ar. Feb. Jan. D ec. N ov. O ct. S ep t. A ug. J u ly Ju n e 1965 1964 A ll ite m s ______ ____ ___________________ A ll ite m s (1947-49 = 100)___________________ 112.9 138.5 112.6 138.2 112.5 138.0 112.0 137.4 111.6 136.9 111.0 136. 2 111.0 136.2 110.6 135.7 110.4 135.5 110.2 135.2 110.0 135.0 110.2 135.2 110.1 135.1 109.9 134.8 108.1 132.6 F o o d ---------- ------------------------------ _ _______ F o o d a t h o m e ___ ___ __ _____ _____ C ereals a n d b a k e ry p ro d u c ts ____ _____ M e a ts, p o u ltry , arid fish _____ _______ D a iry p ro d u c ts ____ ____ . . . ______ F r u its a n d v e g e ta b le s___ __ _ ... O th e r foods a t hom e 2_. _ _ __ _______ Food aw a y from h o m e ____ __________ 113.9 112.3 114.7 114.2 109.6 121.7 101.3 122.8 113.5 112.0 114.3 113.9 109.3 119.2 102.8 122.2 114.0 112.7 114.1 115.6 108.9 119.8 103.6 121.6 113.9 112.6 113.6 116.9 108.1 117.4 103.7 121.2 113.1 111.8 113.2 115. 7 107.0 116.5 103.5 120.8 111.4 109.8 113.0 112.9 106.6 111.3 102.9 120.4 110.6 108.9 112.2 110.1 106.1 111.0 103.8 119.9 109.7 107.8 111.4 108.5 105.8 109.9 102.9 119.6 109.7 107.8 111.3 108.9 105.5 108.5 103.5 119.2 109.7 108.0 111.3 109.8 105.3 108.5 103.0 118.8 110.1 108.6 111. 1 109.8 105.0 114.6 101.9 118.2 110.9 109.7 111.1 109.2 104.3 124.3 101.2 117.6 110.1 108.8 111.0 106.4 104.0 125.9 100.5 117.2 108.8 107.2 111.2 105.1 105.0 115.2 101.8 117.8 106.4 104.7 109.6 98.6 104.7 115.3 101.6 115.2 H o u sin g ----------------------------------------------------S h elter 3________________________________ R e n t____ . _____ H o m eo w n ersh ip 4____ _ _ ___________ F u e l a n d u tilitie s *_ ----------------- -----------F u e l oil a n d c o a l6____________ _ _____ G as a n d e le c tric ity .i__________________ H o u seh o ld fu rn ish in g s a n d o p eratio n 7___ 111.1 114.1 110.2 115.8 108.0 107.0 108.1 104.8 110.7 113.5 110.2 115.0 108.2 108.0 108.2 104.6 110.3 113.0 110.1 114.3 108.3 108.5 108.3 104.4 109.6 112.3 109.9 113.5 106.6 108.9 108.2 104.0 109.4 112.1 109.8 113.3 106.5 109.0 108.2 103.8 109.2 112.0 109.7 113.1 106.4 108.9 107.9 103.6 109.4 111.8 109.5 112.9 108.1 108.6 108.0 103.6 109.2 111.5 109.3 112.5 107.9 107.2 108.0 103.3 109.0 111.2 109.2 112.1 107.7 106.9 107.9 103.3 108.6 110.8 109.1 111.6 107.4 104.3 107.9 103.1 108.2 110.7 109.0 111.4 105.3 103.5 107.7 102.9 108.3 110.6 108.9 111.2 106.6 103.2 106.9 102.9 108.2 110.3 108.8 111.0 106.9 103.4 107.8 103.1 108.5 110.6 108.9 111.4 107.2 105.6 107.8 103.1 107.2 108.7 107.8 109.1 107.3 103.5 107.9 102.8 A p p arel a n d u p k e e p 8................ ......... .............. M e n ’s a n d b o y s’_______ _ ____________ W o m en ’s a n d girls’_____________________ F o o tw e a r____ . . . . . . . . . . . . ___ _ 109.4 110.1 104.7 119.8 109.3 109.9 105.0 119.0 108.7 109.6 104.2 118.1 108.2 109.0 103.9 116.9 107.6 108.6 103.1 116.2 107.3 108.6 102.6 115.6 108.1 109.3 104.3 115.6 108.1 109.2 104.6 115.1 107.8 108.7 104.3 114.4 107.2 107.9 103.8 113.4 106.4 107.2 102.6 112.7 106.1 106.8 102.5 112.0 106.9 107.1 103.5 112.3 106.8 107.4 103.1 112.9 105.7 106.1 102.3 111.0 T r a n s p o r ta tio n . _______ _ ._ _________ . P r iv a te ___ ___________ _______________ P u b lic _________________________ ________ 112.2 110.7 122.8 112.0 110.5 122.1 112.0 110.5 122.1 111.4 109.9 122.1 111.1 109.6 122.0 111.2 109.6 122.0 111.6 110.1 122.0 111.5 110.1 121.6 111.2 109.7 121.6 111.0 109.5 121.6 111.0 109.5 121.5 111.5 110.0 121.4 111.2 109.7 121.3 111.1 109.7 121.4 109.3 107.9 119.0 H e a lth a n d re c re a tio n ______ _. ______ _ M ed ic al care__________________________ . P erso n al care . . _ ______________ R e a d in g a n d recre atio n . . . ____________ O th e r goods a n d services 9_________ . . . 118.7 127.0 112. 2 117.0 114.9 118.4 126.3 112.0 116.8 114.7 118.1 125.8 111.6 116.8 114.3 117.6 125.3 111.0 116.6 113.8 117.1 124.5 110.8 115.9 113.6 116.9 124.2 110.4 115.7 113.4 116.6 123.7 110.0 115.4 113.4 116.4 123.4 109.6 115.4 113.3 116.2 123.0 109.2 115.2 113.3 115.8 122.8 109.2 114.8 112.7 115.6 122.8 109.0 114.3 112.6 115.3 122.7 108.7 114.6 111.5 115.7 122.2 111.0 115.7 111.0 115.6 122.3 109.9 115.2 111.4 113.6 119.4 109.2 114.1 108.8 Special groups: A ll ite m s less s h e lte r____ _____ _____ A ll ite m s less food__ ______. . . ... ... 112.6 112.8 112.4 112.5 112.4 112.2 111.9 111.6 111.4 111.3 110.8 111.1 110.8 111.3 110.4 111.2 110.2 110.9 110.0 110.6 109.8 110.2 110.1 110.2 110.0 110.3 109.6 110.4 108.0 108.9 C o m m o d ities 10________________ . N o n d u r a b le s 14--- . . _____ . . . . . D u r a b le s 1012. ___ _ S e rv ic e s 101314................. . . ____ _ 109.0 111. 5 102.6 122.0 108.8 111.3 102.5 121.5 108.8 111.4 102.3 121.1 108.4 111. 1 102.0 120.1 108.0 110.6 101.8 119.7 107.4 109.6 101.9 119.5 107.4 109.4 102.4 119.3 107.1 108.9 102.4 119.0 106.9 108.7 102.1 118.7 106.6 108.6 101.7 118.5 106.6 108.5 101.8 117.9 106.9 108.7 102.3 117.8 106.9 108.6 102.6 117.6 106.4 107.9 102.6 117.8 105.2 106.0 103.0 115.2 C o m m o d ities less food 10. . . _____________ N o n d u rab les less food_____ . _______ Apparel commodities_____ . . . . . . . Apparel commodities less footwear.. Nondurables less food and apparel____ New cars. . . . ___ . . . . . Used cars__________ . . . _________ Household durables 15_______________ Housefurnishings_____ ______ . . _ _ 106.4 109.5 108.3 106.0 110.1 96.8 118.2 96.7 98.6 106.3 109.3 108.3 106.1 110.0 97.0 117.5 96.7 98.5 106.0 109.0 107.6 105.6 109.8 97.4 117.4 96.4 98.3 105.6 108.6 107.1 105.2 109.4 97.1 115.4 96.2 98.0 105. 4 108.3 106.5 104.6 109.3 97.2 114.0 96.1 97.8 105.3 108.0 106.2 104.3 109.1 97.4 114.8 96.1 97.6 105.7 108.4 107.2 105.5 109.1 98.7 118.2 96.1 97.8 105.6 108.3 107.2 105.7 108.9 98.7 118.7 96.0 97.6 105.3 108.0 106.9 105.4 108.7 97.7 119.4 96.0 97.6 104.9 107.7 106.2 104.8 108.5 96.5 118.9 96.0 97.5 104.7 107.1 105.3 103.8 108.2 97.1 120.3 95.8 97.3 104.7 106.9 105.0 103.6 108.0 97.2 123.0 96.3 97.6 105.1 107.3 106.0 104.7 108.1 97.4 122.7 97.3 98.2 105.1 107.2 105.8 104.4 108.0 99.0 120.8 96.9 97.9 104.4 105.7 104.9 103.6 106.2 101.2 121.6 98.4 98.4 Services less r e n t1013__ _ ______ _ __ Household services less r e n t10__ ______ Transportation services. ____ _______ Medical care services. . . . . . ______ Other services 1018___________________ 124.8 121.7 123. 2 133.0 126.4 124.1 120.9 123. 0 132.1 125.9 123.6 120.2 123.0 131.4 125.5 122.5 118.5 122.6 130.8 125.0 122.0 118.1 122.6 129.9 124.1 121.8 117.9 122.5 129.5 123.8 121.6 118.4 121.3 128.9 123.2 121.3 118.1 121.0 128.5 123.0 121.0 117.9 120.7 128.1 122.8 120.7 117.6 120.2 127.8 122.6 120.0 116.6 119.6 127.7 122.1 120.0 116.9 119.1 127.5 121.9 119.7 116.8 118.6 127.0 121.7 120.0 117.0 119.3 127.1 121.8 117.0 114.8 115.0 123.2 118.5 _______ _____ _ . ___ ... ... 1 The C PI measures the average change in prices of goods and services purchased by urban wage-earner and clerical-worker families. Beginning January 1964, the index structure has been revised to reflect buying patterns of wage earners and clerical workers in the 1960’s. The indexes shown here are based on expenditures of all urban wage-earner and clerical-worker consumers, including single workers living alone, as well as families of two or more persons. 2 Includes eggs, fats and oils, sugar and sweets, nonalcoholic beverages, and prepared and partially prepared foods. 3 Also includes hotel and motel room rates not shown separately. 4Includes home purchase, mortgage interest, taxes, insurance, and main tenance and repairs. 5 Also includes telephone, water, and sewerage service not shown separately. 6 Called “ Solid and petroleum fuels” prior to 1964. 7Includes housefurnishings and housekeeping supplies and services. 8 Includes dry cleaning and laundry of apparel, infants’ wear, sewing materials, jewelry, and miscellaneous apparel, not shown separately. 9 Includes tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and funeral, legal, and bank service charges. 10 Recalculated group—indexes prior to January 1964 have been recomputed. 11 Includes foods, paint, furnace filters, shrubbery, fuel oil, coal, household textiles, housekeeping supplies, apparel, gasoline and motor oil, drugs and https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis pharmaceuticals, toilet goods, nondurable recreational goods, newspapers, magazines, books, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages. >2 Includes home purchase, which was classified under services prior to 1964, building materials, furniture and bedding, floor coverings, household appliances, dinnerware, tableware, cleaning equipment, power tools, lamps, Venetian blinds, hardware, automobiles, tires, radios, television sets, tape recorders, durable toys, and sports equipment. 13 Excludes home purchase costs which were classified under this heading prior to 1964. 14 Includes rent, mortgage interest, taxes and insurance on real property, home maintenance and repair services, gas, electricity, telephone, water, sewerage service, household help, postage, laundry and dry cleaning, furni ture and apparel repair and upkeep, moving, auto repairs, auto insurance, registration and license fees, parking and garage rent, local transit, taxicab, airplane, train, and bus fares, professional medical services, hospital services, health insurance, barber and beauty shop services, movies, fees for sports, television repairs, and funeral, bank, and legal services. 18 Called “ Durables less cars” prior to 1964. Does not include auto parts, durable toys, and sports equipment. 18 Includes the services components of apparel, personal care, reading and recreation, and other goods and services. Not comparable with series pub lished prior to 1964. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 946 T able D-2. Consumer Price Index 1—U.S. city average for urban wage earners and clerical workers, selected groups, subgroups, and special groups of items, seasonally adjusted 2 [1957-59=100 unless otherwise specified] 1965 1966 Group June M ay Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June ___ _ ___ - . 114.0 112.4 115.9 110. 7 115. 8 102.9 114.0 112.6 116.0 110.2 115.3 104.0 114.3 113.2 117.1 109.4 117.7 104.5 114.2 112.9 117.7 108.0 117.4 104.4 113.1 111.8 115.7 106.7 117.7 103.3 111.6 110.0 112.9 105.9 113.9 102.1 110.8 109.2 110.3 105.4 114.1 103.3 110.0 108.2 108.1 105.2 114.4 102.1 109.7 107.8 107.6 104.9 113.3 101.7 109.4 107.7 107.5 105.1 112.6 101.6 109.8 108.2 108.3 105.1 113.8 102.1 109.8 108.3 109.0 104.8 116.5 102.0 110.2 108.9 108.0 105.1 119.8 102.1 ___ ___ 108.4 109.2 108. 5 109. 5 108.2 107.7 106.3 106.9 106.3 106.5 106.0 106.6 107.7 107.3 107.7 106.6 107.7 107.1 107.6 105.7 105. 8 105.6 107.1 105.4 107.3 105.5 Apparel and up k eep 5 ___ ___ Men’s and boys’ _ _ _________ -- - - __ Women’s and girls’__ _ ____ _____ ______ _____ ___ Footwear _ __ _ ............ . . 109.5 110.2 105.0 119.9 109.4 109. 9 105. 4 119.0 108.8 109.7 104.5 118.1 108.5 109.4 104.4 117.0 108.0 109.0 103. 8 116.3 107.8 109.0 103.6 115.6 107.6 108.8 103.3 115.4 107.5 108.5 103.4 114.9 107.2 108.3 102.9 114.3 107.0 107.7 103.3 113.4 106.8 107.5 103.3 112.9 106.5 107.1 103.0 112.3 107.0 107.2 103.8 112.4 Transportation ____ _ Private__ __ 112.3 110.8 112.0 110.5 112.3 110.8 111.8 110.5 111.4 110.0 110.8 109.2 111.3 109.8 110.9 109.4 110.8 109.2 111.2 109.7 111.0 109.5 111.4 109.9 111.3 109.8 108.9 111.5 102.6 109.0 111.6 102. 5 109.0 111.6 102.3 108.6 111.4 102.1 108.1 110.7 101.9 107.5 109.8 101.9 107.4 109.5 102.2 107.0 108.9 102.0 106.7 108.5 101.9 106.5 108.5 101.9 106.6 108.4 102.0 106.7 108.3 102.4 106.8 108.6 102.6 106.5 109.6 108.4 106.2 97.4 116. 8 98.4 106.4 109. 4 108. 4 106.3 97.4 117.6 98.4 106.0 109.1 107.8 105.9 97.4 118.2 98.0 105.7 108.8 107.4 105. 6 96.9 117.6 97.8 105.6 108.6 107.0 105.2 96.8 117.3 97.9 105.4 108.1 106.8 104.9 96.6 116.5 97.9 105.4 108.1 106.5 104.8 97.6 118.4 97.8 105.2 108.0 106.3 104.8 96.9 117.4 97.5 105.0 107.6 105.9 104.5 96.8 118.0 97.6 104.9 107.5 106.0 104.5 98.4 117.5 97.5 105.0 107.3 105.8 104.3 98.4 119.0 97. 6 104.8 107.1 105.2 103.9 98.4 121.3 97.7 105.2 107.4 106.1 104.9 98.0 121.2 98.0 Food. _____ - ____ - -Food at home - Meats, poultry, and fish Dairy products ____________ Fruits and vegetables _ Other foods at home.. Fuel and utilities3 Fuel oil and coal4 ____ ________ _ _____ _ . - - - - - -......... Special groups: Commodities8 Nondurables _ _ . D urables87 __ ----- __ - -. ------------- ______ _ _____- Commodities less food 8 . _. Nondurables less food ___ ___ ______ Apparel commodities.-- Apparel commodities less footwear. N ew cars _ - __- - - - - - Used cars___ ______ Housefurnishings . . i __ - . __ 1 See footnote 1, table D -l. 2 Beginning January 1966, seasonally adjusted national indexes were com puted for selected groups, subgroups, and special groups where there is a significant seasonal pattern of price change. Previously published indexes for the year 1965 have been adjusted. No seasonally adjusted indexes will be shown for any of the individual metropolitan areas for which separate indexes are published. Previously, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has made available only seasonal factors, rather than seasonally adjusted indexes (e.g., Department of Labor Bulletin 1366, Seasonal Factors, Consumer Price Index: Selected Series). The factors currently used were derived by the BLS https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Seasonal Factor Method using data for 1956-65. These factors will be u p dated at the end of each calendar year, but the revised factors will be used only for future seasonal adjustments and not for revision of previously published indexes. A detailed description of the BLS Seasonal Factor Method is available upon request. 8 See footnote 5, table D -l. 4 See footnote 6, table D -l. * See footnote 8, table D -l. 8 See footnote 10, table D -l. 7 See footnote 12, table D -l. 947 D.—CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES T able D-3. Consumer Price Index—U.S. and selected areas for urban wage earners and clerical workers 1 [1957-59=100 unless otherwise specified] 1965 1966 Annual average 194749=100 Area 2 June May Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Sept. Aug. July 110.4 110.2 110.0 110.2 (4) (4) (4) 104.0 107.7 (4) Oct. 1965 1964 110.1 109.9 108.1 138.5 (4) (4) 113.5 (4) 107.7 (4) 107.9 110.0 (4) (4) 107.9 107.5 108.1 109.6 113.2 103.5 107.6 107.2 106.7 107.9 111.1 101.1 106.1 106.3 137.5 140.7 (4) June June 1966 All items 112.5 112.0 (4) (4) (4) 106.6 110.2 (4) (4) (4) 116.8 (4) 109.9 (4) 110.3 112.5 (4) (4) 109.9 109.1 Cleveland, O h io ...----- -- -(4) Dnllns T py fNTnv 1963 —100") (4) Detroit, Mich- -------- - - ----- 111.0 Honolulu, Hawaii (Dec. 1963=100). 104.6 Houston, Tex__ _________ ____ (4) Kansas City, Mo.-Kansas... . .. 116.5 109.7 104 6 110.4 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 110. 0 (4) 110.9 (4) 114.5 Los Angeles-Long Beach, Calif— Milwaukee, Wis___ - -- ---------(4) Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn----- . (4) NewYork,N.Y.-Northeastern N.J 115.3 . . . . 113.4 Philadelphia, P a.-N .J___ Pittsburgh, P a __ ___ . . . -(4) Portland, Oreg.-Wash.5_____ (4) 114.2 110.1 (4) 115.2 113.1 (4) (4) St. Louis, M o.-Ill------------ -------- 113.6 San Diego, Calif. (Feb. 1965 = 100)-. (4) San Francisco-Oakland, Calif------- 115.2 Scranton, Pa.5__ ... (4) Seattle, W ash.. . _ ------(4) Washington, D .C .-M d.-V a___ . (4) (4) 101.6 (4) U.S. city average3 --------- 112.9 111.1 Atlanta; Qa-------- - ------------------- 113.4 Baltimore, M d------------- -Boston, M ass--- ---- - - ---(4) Buffalo, N.Y. (Nov. 1963=100)___ (4) Chicago, 111.-Northwestern In d ----- 110.6 Cincinnati, Ohio-Kentucky______ 110.2 112.6 114.1 113.7 112.8 111.0 111.0 (4) (4) (4) 105.8 109.3 (4) (4) (4) 113.9 (4) 108.6 (4) 109.2 110.9 (4) (4) 108.8 107.9 l4) (4) (4) 104.6 108.4 (4) (4) (4) 113.6 (4) 108.3 (4) 108.2 110.0 (4) (4) 108.0 107.1 (4) (4) 109.4 104.4 (4) 115.3 108.1 103.4 108.8 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 108.4 (4) 110.0 (4) (4) (4) 108.0 103.9 (4) 114.6 107.8 102. 7 107.6 (4) (4) (4) (") (4) 107.4 (4) 109.3 (4) (4) (4) 106.9 102.3 (4) 114.3 107.1 101.7 106. 8 (4) (b (4) (4) (4) 106.9 (4) 108.5 (4) (4) (4) 107.0 101.7 (4) 113.9 106.9 101.4 106.4 102.1 108.5 113.3 105.2 100.1 104.0 100.3 107.2 109.8 (4) 144.1 114.3 (4) 111.8 115.2 113.2 113.0 114.7 113.7 (4) (4) 114.8 112.7 (4) (4) 113.4 109.5 (4) 114.2 112.4 (4) (4) 112.8 (4) 110.5 113.4 111.6 111.0 112.9 113.2 (4) (4) 113.5 111.8 (4> (4) 112.8 108.7 (4) 113.2 111.4 (4) (4) 112.7 (4) 110.1 113.0 111.1 110.7 112.9 112.8 (4) (4) 112.9 110.8 (4) (4) 111. 5 108.9 (4) 112. 6 110.6 (4) (4) 112.7 (4) 109.7 112.4 111.0 110.8 112.4 112.9 (4) (4) 112.2 110.7 (4) (4) 112.5 108.2 109.5 112.2 110.6 110.2 110.2 106.0 108.0 110.4 108.8 108.5 109.0 142.8 (4) (4) 138.9 139.3 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 112.1 (4) 114.9 (4) 101.2 (4) 113. 9 112.6 111.9 (4) (4; 111.5 (4) 113.6 (4) 100.3 (4) (4) (4) 99.6 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 111.6 109.9 100.1 112.7 141.0 (4) 111.5 109.6 (4) (4) (4) 110.2 (4) 113.0 (4) (4) (4) 108.1 (4) 109.9 (4) 112.7 (4) (4) (4) 111.0 109.6 110.6 109.3 109.7 108.1 146.2 (4) (4) (4) 109.7 109.7 110.1 110.9 110.1 108.8 106.4 108.1 111.2 114.5 105.3 110.3 107.0 108.8 111.9 114.9 106.9 110.6 108.5 108.4 110. 8 113.0 105.9 110.1 108.1 107.4 104.8 109.3 «106. 6 112.5 109.8 104.1 101.5 108.8 106.1 106.2 104.5 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 111.6 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 110.6 111.7 111.8 110.5 111.8 111.0 139.5 134.1 (4) 136.9 Food U.S. city average 3----------- ------ .. 113.9 113.5 114.0 113.9 113.1 1 1 1 .4 110.6 109.7 112.4 115.9 Poston Mass 115.7 Buffalo, N.Y. (Nov. 1963 = 100)___ 108.5 Chicago, Ill.-Northwestern I n d .. . 114.3 111.6 112.0 115.3 115.3 108.0 113.6 110.7 112.8 116.3 116.6 109.2 114.2 111. 2 112.4 115.5 116.0 108.0 115.1 110.9 111.9 115.5 115.4 108.2 114.2 110. 9 1 1 0 .5 1 1 2 .7 113.6 106.0 112.0 108. 9 109.8 111.5 112.5 105.2 111.2 107.8 108.4 110.0 112.6 104.8 110.4 106.8 108.8 110.7 112.8 104.2 110.0 106.9 108.4 110.8 113.2 104.5 109.8 106.6 111.1 109 4 112.0 106.6 114.4 116.9 110. 0 109. 4 111.5 106.2 114.1 116.0 110.3 110.2 111.6 106.6 114.8 116.5 110.1 109.0 111.3 106.7 114.3 116. 7 109.8 108. 6 110.0 106.4 113.6 116.4 106.9 107.6 108.9 106.2 113.2 115.3 107.2 106.2 107.9 105.9 112.4 114.4 106.7 105.5 106.5 104.6 110.5 114.3 106.8 105.1 106.2 103.9 111.0 113.0 106.2 105.1 105.8 103.3 111.1 112.6 106.6 105. 5 106.6 103.2 111.1 112.6 106.8 105.3 108.0 103.9 110.4 112.2 106.0 104.2 106.8 103.7 109.7 111.6 104.8 103.9 105.0 103.5 109.2 111.3 102.1 100.5 101.9 100.8 105.7 107.2 . 112.4 113.0 113.5 111. 7 114.4 112.5 111.5 114.7 113.5 113.4 112.9 112.6 111.3 114.2 111.9 111.7 113.0 112.1 111.1 111.7 111.5 108.2 108.0 111.7 109.6 108.4 111.8 108.9 110.8 108.2 108.2 107.9 110.9 108.0 109.3 111.8 111.2 107.9 108.2 110.5 110.8 109. 5 109.7 109.3 111.5 109.5 109.3 110.-4 109.3 108.3 110.5 108.1 108.5 109.9 112.2 110.3 110.7 107.7 107.1 109.8 107.2 107.5 109.5 108.2 105.0 IO4 . 6 108.4 105.2 104.8 107.1 114.4 114.0 112.4 112.9 111.8 112.7 103. 7 110.7 107.7 109.2 109.3 111.4 108.3 111.1 111.2 111.0 111.1 111.1 109.5 109.3 n^ll^s T py nsjnv 1063—100") Detroit. Mi eh _ _ .. Honolulu, Hawaii (Dec. 1963 = 100) Konst,on, Tex Los Angeles-Lon g Beach, Calif.. 111. 6 New York, N.Y.-Northeastern N .J. 114.5 112.9 111.4 P itts b u r g h , P a P o rtla n d Oreg - W a sh .6 115.5 S t Tvonis M o -111 S eattle , W ash Washington, D .C.-M d.-V a____ 117.2 113. 6 im . 5 114.3 114.1 117.0 106.3 113.9 m .i 114.4 113.6 112.4 115.0 113.4 112.7 115.1 112.8 112.8 114.0 111.9 113. 4 117.1 116.7 114.7 113.1 114.0 114.2 114.6 116.3 106.6 113.8 113.7 113.8 112.9 113.2 112 .8 112.1 112.1 110 .8 111.5 110.6 1 See footnote 1, table 0-1. Indexes measure time-to-time changes in prices. They do not ind icate whether it costs more to live in one area than in another. 2 The areas listed include not only the central city but the entire urban portion of the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, as defined for the 1960 Census of Population; except that the Standard Consolidated Area is used for New York and Chicago. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 109.5 110.3 110.4 110.0 109 3 111.6 110 .2 107.9 108.2 110.5 109. 6 110.5 110.8 110.6 112.0 112.8 113.4 112.5 111.5 102.7 112.0 1 1 0 .5 111.1 110.2 104.7 108.2 108.2 111.9 110.5 109.6 112.0 109.4 107.7 110.3 108.4 107.6 107.7 105.6 108.7 106.0 ! Average of 56 “cities” (metropolitan areas and nonmetropolitan urban places) beginning January 1966. 4 All items indexes are computed monthly for 5 areas and once every 3 months on a rotating cycle for other areas. s Old series. * 10-month average. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 948 T able D-4. Indexes of wholesale prices,1 by group and subgroup of commodities [1957-59=100, unless otherwise specified]3 1965 1966 Annual average Commodity group Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 103.1 103.0 102.9 102.9 102.8 102.5 100.5 103.6 103.5 103.3 103.7 103.5 102.1 98.0 100.3 94.2 87.4 104.0 89.8 107.3 114.0 107.2 99.9 107.6 110.6 105.5 110.4 99.4 95.6 88.6 103.2 89.9 105.9 105.1 102.6 100.1 106.9 109.4 104.9 109.4 99.5 96.1 89.3 102.6 90.0 104.8 105.9 105.4 100.8 106.7 109.1 105.3 109.1 99.1 85.5 88.3 106.4 90.5 103.9 100.0 106.6 98.3 106.7 108.8 106.3 108.5 100.0 103.9 88.4 105.0 91.8 102.4 84.7 113.8 95.4 106.6 109.3 106.3 107.8 100.3 109.0 89.6 104.6 92.0 100.7 82.0 114.7 95.6 106.1 108.5 105.5 107.1 98.4 101.8 89.6 98.9 91.1 103.5 93.5 112.9 97.6 105.1 109.0 101.0 108.5 94.3 103.2 94.1 84.7 98.3 102.0 90.8 110.1 98.6 101.0 107.8 90.8 107.8 Ju n e 3 M ay Apr. Mar. Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. 105.7 8105. 6 105.5 105.4 105.4 104.6 104.1 103.5 Farm products and processed foods___ 107.7 8107.9 108.7 109.4 109.8 107.7 106.5 104.3 Farm products . . . . . . Fresh and dried fruits and vegetables . Grains. . . . ------Livestock and live poultry---- ----------Plant and animal fibers--------- .. . . . Fluid milk . . . . . Eggs .. .. ----------Hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds------------Other farm products___. . . .............. . Processed foods.. ... . Cereal and bakery products__ . ------Meats, poultry, and fish---- -------------Dairy products and ice cream _ ------Canned and frozen fruits and vege tables. . . Sugar and confectionery____________ Packaged beverage materials . . . Animal fats and oils. . . . . . . Crude vegetable oils_____ ___ ___ Refined vegetable oils______________ Vegetable oil end products---- -- --------Miscellaneous processed foods_______ All commodities except farm products. __ All commodities except farm and foods__ Textile products and apparel__________ Cotton products___________________ Wool products____________________ Manmade fiber textile products.. . . Silk products___ . . . . . ____________ Apparel __ . . . _ ___ Miscellaneous textile products . ___ Hides, skins, leather, and leather prod ucts ._ . ___ Hides and skins___________________ Leather ___ . ... Footw ear... _ _ _ _______ _______ Other leather p ro d u cts.______ _____ Fuel and related products, and power ... Coal.. . . . . . . _____ Coke____ . . . _________ ___ . .. Gas fuels 8________ ____ . . .. . . . Electric power 8____ _____ . . ----Petroleum products, refined_________ Chemicals and allied products_____ . Industrial chemicals______ ________ Prepared paint_________________ . . . Paint materials_________ ________ Drugs and pharmaceuticals_________ Fats and oils inedible. _______ _____ Mixed fertilizer . Fertilizer materials____ . . . . . . . . ._ Other chemicals and allied products__ Rubber and rubber products... _ __ _. Crude rubber.. . . . ____ ____ _____ Tires and tubes . . . _____ ______ .. Miscellaneous rubber products_______ Lumber and wood products___ . . . .. Lumber_____ ___. . . . _____ _ .. M illw ork... __________ . . . ___ Plywood_____________ ________ Pulp, paper, and allied products. _. ___ Woodpulp________ Wastepaper----- ------------- . .. _ . . . Paper__ ____________________ ____ Paperboard. _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ __ Converted paper and paperboard prod u cts___ ._ _ . . . . . . _ _______ .. Building paper and board___________ 104.1 104.5 106.4 106.8 99.7 4103. 3 4111.0 <101.7 91.2 94.9 93.6 90.8 108.5 110.4 112.4 114.2 90.3 89.9 90.3 89.7 111.8 4111.0 111.9 113.3 86.9 101.8 118.5 90.9 122.6 120.2 116.9 115.6 101.1 101.4 102.5 102.1 110.5 110.5 110.6 111.5 113.9 113.0 112.6 112.2 109.9 110.9 110.9 113.3 117.0 114.9 114.8 115. 0 107.4 98.0 92.9 116.7 89.5 111.5 116.3 116.6 102.3 111.8 112.1 114.9 113.0 104.5 97.5 92.4 112.6 89.6 108.4 99.8 113.5 102.5 110.3 111.8 112.7 110.9 103.0 92.2 90.1 109.0 89.6 108.0 118.2 110.8 103.5 109.4 111.2 110.5 111.3 All com m odities... . .. ---- ------ . . . See footnotes at end of table. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 104.8 109.4 93.5 105.5 105.6 104.7 101.9 112.5 105.8 104.9 102.2 102.8 106.5 89.9 143.8 104.8 124.1 105.4 109.3 93.5 107.7 105.6 108.5 4101.9 113.1 4105. 7 104.7 102.2 102.6 4106. 4 89.9 140. 9 4104.9 124.7 104.8 109.3 93.5 115.2 106.7 111.3 102.5 114.0 105.3 104.3 102.2 102.3 106.3 90.5 151.6 104.7 125.1 104.8 109.7 93.5 121.8 104.3 112.0 103.0 114.4 105.2 104.0 102.1 101.8 106.0 90.8 151.4 104.7 126.3 105.2 110.1 93.5 126.2 107.6 116.0 102.5 114.1 105.1 103.8 102.0 101.5 105.8 91.0 155.3 104.7 124.2 104.7 109.4 93.5 125.8 106.5 116.1 99.5 114.0 104.6 103.5 101.9 101.0 105.9 91.3 147.6 104.6 124.7 105.1 108.8 93.4 116.4 100.3 109.1 98.4 114.1 104.2 103.2 102.0 101.2 105.4 91.9 143.6 104.3 130.0 105.4 109.2 93.4 115.8 100.9 105 0 101.2 114.2 103.9 103.2 101.9 101.0 105.4 92.5 142.2 104.2 127.0 104.7 109.4 93.4 122.1 101.3 94.6 101.2 114.1 103.5 102.8 102.0 100.8 105.4 93.3 140.3 104.3 127.1 101.8 108.8 93.4 119.7 100.3 91.0 101.2 114.3 103.4 102.7 102.1 100.6 105.2 94.2 134.9 104.2 127.7 100.4 108.9 93.4 114.1 93.2 90.0 101.2 114.8 103.3 102.7 101.9 100.4 105.0 94.7 132.8 104.1 122.8 101.8 109.1 93.5 115.9 91.3 89.4 101.2 113.4 103.2 102. 5 101.9 100.3 104.4 95.7 127.6 103.8 120.7 101.5 109.2 93.5 108.4 94.4 89.2 101.2 112.7 103.1 102.5 101.9 100.2 104.0 95.9 132.2 103.6 123.3 102.1 109.0 93.8 113.4 100.9 97.0 101.2 113.6 102.9 102.5 101.8 100.2 104.3 95.0 134.3 103.7 123.0 104.8 111.8 96.9 95.4 84.5 82.2 89.7 108.9 101.2 101.2 101.2 99.6 103.0 95.8 117.3 102.8 117.9 123.1 161.0 126.3 119.1 116.0 101.5 97.0 109.4 128.3 100.2 100.2 97.7 95.8 106.8 89.9 94.5 101.2 105.5 104.8 100.0 95.4 89.5 94.4 98.9 108.0 112.1 110.6 93.8 103.0 98.0 112.7 108.0 97.2 4122.9 120.8 163.0 148.8 125.1 122.4 4119.1 4118.4 4115.4 114.4 4100. 4 100.0 96.9 94.9 107.3 107.3 128.3 129.2 100.2 100.3 98.4 97.7 97.6 97.7 496.0 95.6 106.2 106.2 90.2 90.4 94.1 94.1 102.5 104.0 4105. 5 105.8 106.6 105.5 100.0 100.0 95.4 95.4 90.0 90.0 94.4 94.4 98.7 98.7 4109. 6 108.4 113.1 110.9 110.4 109.6 4100.3 102.4 4102. 7 102.3 98.0 98.0 112.0 110.3 107.1 106.0 97.2 97.1 118.7 147.8 123.3 115.3 112.5 99.9 97.5 107.3 128.2 100.4 97.2 97.6 95.2 105.9 89.8 94.4 106.4 105.4 104.7 100.2 94.3 91.2 91.1 98.7 105.6 107.4 109.3 97.7 101.8 98.0 108.7 105.4 97.0 117.8 152.8 118.0 114.9 111.6 100.3 98.2 107.3 128.9 100.4 97.8 97.6 95.2 105.9 89.5 94.5 110.0 105.3 104.7 100.2 94.1 91.0 91.1 98.5 103.7 105.6 108.4 94.0 101.3 98.0 105.5 105.4 96.7 116.0 140.0 116.6 114.4 110.3 100.5 98.1 107.3 128.2 100.4 98.3 97.6 95.1 105.9 89.5 94.4 113.1 105.4 103.8 100.2 93.7 90.0 91.1 97.9 102.8 104.3 107.9 93.9 101.2 98.0 105.8 105.2 96.7 114.6 132.3 114.2 113.8 110.2 ICO. 6 97.6 107.3 128.6 100.7 98.4 97.6 95.5 105.9 89.0 94.6 110.1 105. 5 103.8 99.8 93.5 89.6 91.1 97.7 101.9 103.4 107.9 92.1 100.9 98.1 104.6 104.9 96.5 113.6 . 126.5 113.3 113.7 109.0 100.3 97.5 107.3 126.8 100.8 98.1 97.5 95.5 105.9 89.0 94.7 106.7 105.2 103.8 100.1 93.5 89.3 91.1 97.7 101.6 103.0 107.8 91.7 100.8 98.1 107.0 104.8 96. 5 113.3 125.6 111.9 113.6 109.0 99.4 97.3 107.3 125.8 100.8 96.6 97.6 95.4 105.9 89.7 94.1 110.1 105.9 103.4 100.0 93.4 89.0 91.1 97.6 101.6 103.0 107.8 91.6 100.5 98.1 104.5 104.5 96.5 111.3 124.9 110.9 110.3 109.3 99.2 96.6 107.3 125.3 100.8 96.4 97.2 95.0 105.7 89.2 93.9 108.4 105.9 102.5 99.9 93.3 88.7 91.1 97.5 102.0 103.1 107.8 93.3 100.0 98.1 97.3 104.1 96.4 112.2 133.4 112.5 110.2 108.8 99.0 95.8 107.3 123.9 100.8 96.4 97.1 95.0 105.7 89.2 93.9 104.4 105.7 102.1 99.8 93.2 88.6 91.1 97.4 101.8 102.5 107.8 94.6 99.9 98.1 97.5 104.1 96.3 108.8 117.4 105.9 110.0 105.2 98.7 95.2 107.3 122.5 100.7 96.0 97.4 95.0 105.7 89.6 94.0 110.3 104.8 103.3 99.8 93.0 89.1 90.2 97.4 100.5 101.2 107.8 91.0 99.9 98.1 98.3 104.1 96.3 107.7 103.1 107.6 109.8 104.7 98.7 94.7 107.3 122.7 100.8 96.0 97.4 94.8 105.7 89.3 93.9 114.0 104.8 104.3 99.8 93.1 90.1 90.2 97.2 100.3 101.1 107.8 90.5 100.0 98.1 98.0 104.1 96.3 109.2 111.2 108.1 110.7 106.1 98.9 96.5 107.3 124.1 100.8 95.9 97.4 95.0 105.4 89.8 94.4 112.7 105.1 103.5 99.8 92.9 90.0 90.0 97.1 101.1 101.9 107.7 92.3 99.9 98.1 99.4 104.1 96.4 104.6 87.5 102.9 108.5 103.1 97.1 96.9 106.3 121.3 101.1 92.7 96.7 94.2 104.7 91.0 95.0 96.8 103.9 100.1 99.4 92.5 90.6 89.0 96.9 100.6 100.7 108.5 92.3 99.0 96.1 92.4 103.6 96.4 101.6 92.7 100.9 92.7 100.8 92.7 100.4 92.7 100.1 93.3 99.8 93.8 99.6 93.4 99.4 93.3 99.3 93.2 99.5 92.7 99.3 92.9 98.3 94.2 102.4 92.6 102.2 492.6 102.2 92.6 D.—CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES T able D-4. 949 Indexes of wholesale prices,1 by group and subgroup of commodities—Continued [1957-59=100, unless otherwise specified]2 1966 1965 Annual average Commodity group June 3 All commodities except farm and foods— Continued Metals and metal products___________ Iron and steel—_ _ _ ____ ___ Nonferrous metals______ _ _ _ ____ Metal containers,— Hardware__ _ ---- -- --------Plumbing fixtures and brass fittings__ ___ Heating equipment_________ Fabricated structural metal products.. Fabricated nonstructural metal prod ucts__ _ _______ ____ _____ Machinery and motive products., Agricultural machinery and equipment. Construction machinery and equip m ent____ _ ____ Metalworking machinery and equip m ent_____ . , ___ . . . General purpose machinery and equip m ent_____ _____ _ ., ______ _ Miscellaneous machinery___ _ Special industry machinery and equip ment 8_______ ____ _____ _____ Electrical machinery and equipm ent._ Motor vehicles____________________ Transportation equipment, railroad rolling stock8____________________ Furniture and other household durables. _ Household furniture . . . . ... Commercial furniture . . _ Floor coverings_____. . _ . . . ______ Household appliances__________ _ _ Television, radio receivers, and phono graphs. _ . ____________________ Other household durable goods______ Nonmetallic mineral products________ Flat glass. _____ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Concrete ingredients.. _______ ____ Concrete p ro d u cts... _ _______._ _. Structural clay products____________ Gypsum products______ _________ Asphalt roofing ? _. ___ __________ _ Other nonmetallic minerals________ Tobacco products and bottled beverages __ Tobacco products. . . . . Alcoholic beverages.._ _ . ___ Nonalcoholic beverages___________ Miscellaneous products___________ .. Toys, sporting goods, small arms, am munition _________ _____________ Manufactured animal feeds____ ___ Notions and accessories.. . . . _ ___ Jewelry, watches, and photographic equipm ent.. _ __________ _. Other miscellaneous products.. . May Apr. Mar. Feb. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 108.7 108.4 108.2 108.0 107.5 107.0 106.6 106.7 106.3 106.2 106.2 105.8 105.9 105.7 102.8 102.0 101.8 102.0 102.3 102.2 102.0 101.7 101.3 101.2 101.2 101.4 101.5 101.3 101.4 100.5 123.2 4122. 5 122.1 120.8 119.5 118.3 117.2 118.7 117.4 117.0 116.5 115.5 116.2 115.2 105.9 110.1 110.1 110.0 109.8 109.8 109.8 109.8 108.3 108.3 108.3 108.3 108.3 108.3 107.6 105.5 109.8 109.6 108.4 108.3 107.4 107.3 107.2 107.0 106.7 106.5 106. 4 106.1 105.9 106.0 104.8 108.5 4107. 9 ‘ 107.1 ‘ 105.7 ‘ 104.9 ‘ 104.8 ‘ 104.9 ‘103.6 ‘ 103.4 ‘ 103.4 ‘ 103.5 ‘ 102.6 ‘ 102.5 ‘ 103.1 ‘ 100.9 92.5 92.1 92.1 91.7 91.6 91.6 91.9 91.8 91.5 91.9 91.9 91.7 92.0 91.7 92.0 103.9 4103.8 103.4 103.1 102.6 102.3 102.0 102.0 101.8 101.8 101.7 101.4 101.2 101.2 99.3 111.2 110.9 110.9 110.9 110.5 110.0 109.7 109.8 109.8 109.9 109.9 109.1 109.2 109.4 108.5 105.9 4105.8 105.2 105.0 104.7 104.4 104.2 104.1 103.9 103.8 103.8 103.7 103.8 103.7 102.9 118.3 ‘ 118.2 118.1 118.0 117.8 117.3 117.0 116.8 114.9 115.0 114.8 114.9 114.7 115.1 112.9 118.9 ‘ 118.9 118.5 117.9 117.5 116.9 116.5 116.4 115.8 115.6 115.6 115.3 115.2 115.3 112.4 123.5 ‘ 122.5 121.2 121.1 121.0 119.8 118.9 118.6 118.3 117.9 117.4 116.5 116.4 116.9 112.6 109.8 ‘ 109.3 106.0 105.9 108.5 105.7 107.3 105.8 106.8 105.6 106.8 105.4 106.5 105.4 106.5 105.3 106.3 105.1 105.7 104.9 105.3 105.1 104.7 105.2 104.7 105.5 105.1 105.2 104.4 104.5 111.7 98.7 100.7 110.8 ‘ 98.7 100.9 110.0 98.4 100.2 109.9 98.2 100.3 109.4 97.8 100.4 109.1 97.0 100.5 109.0 96.6 100.5 108.9 96.5 100.5 108.2 96.6 100.5 108.2 96.6 100.5 108.0 96.7 100.7 107.9 97.0 100.7 107.9 96.9 100.7 108.0 96.8 100.7 105.9 96.8 100.5 101.0 101.0 98.9 98.9 108.9 ‘ 108.9 105.3 ‘ 105.3 97.1 97.5 89.4 89.4 101.0 98.6 108.3 104.1 97.5 89.3 101.0 98.4 107.2 104.1 97.5 89.1 101.0 98.4 107.2 104.1 97.7 89.0 101.0 98.3 107.0 104.1 97.7 89.0 101.0 98.2 106.7 104.0 97.5 88.8 101.0 98.0 106.6 104.0 97.4 88.6 101.0 97.8 106.4 103.7 97.3 88.6 101.0 97.7 106.2 103.7 97.5 88.6 101.0 97.7 106.1 103.7 97.5 88.6 101.0 97.8 105.9 103.7 97.7 89.2 101.0 98.0 105.9 103.7 97.7 89.4 100.9 98.0 106.2 103.7 97.7 89.2 100.5 98.5 105.3 103.2 99.4 91.3 83.5 83.5 106.7 106.7 102.4 102.4 100.2 ‘ 100.2 103.6 ‘ 103.7 102.9 102.7 106.5 106.3 102.2 102.2 94.4 94.4 101.8 102.2 109.8 109.4 110.3 110.3 101.0 101.0 130.9 128.5 116.0 115.1 83.5 106.7 102.3 99.5 103.8 102.7 106.0 101.4 94.8 102.0 109.4 110.2 101.0 128.5 113.0 83.5 106.9 102.1 99.2 103.8 102.2 105.9 101.4 94.8 102.1 109.2 109.8 101.0 128.5 113.1 83.8 107.1 102.1 99.9 103.7 102.1 105.8 101.4 94.8 101.7 108.0 106.6 101.0 128.5 116.0 83.9 106.8 102.0 99.9 103.6 102.0 105.6 101.4 94.6 101.8 108.1 106.6 101.1 128.5 114.3 84.5 106.2 101.6 99.9 103.4 101.8 105.6 97.4 94.6 100.9 107.9 106.0 101.3 128.5 112.5 84.5 106.2 101.6 99.9 103.4 101.8 105.4 98.6 94.6 101.0 107.7 106.1 100.9 128.5 113.2 84.5 105.5 101.6 99.9 103.4 101.6 105.4 99.1 94.6 101.1 107.7 106.1 100.9 128.5 111.2 84.4 105.4 101.6 99.9 103.2 101.6 105.4 99.9 95.0 101.3 107.7 106.1 100.9 128.5 111.5 84.4 105.3 101.6 100.2 103.2 101.5 105.3 100.6 92.1 101.4 107.6 106.1 100.7 128.5 111.5 84.6 105.2 101.7 100.2 103.1 101.7 104.9 105.7 92.1 101.4 107.6 106.1 100.7 128.1 112.6 85.9 105. 2 102.0 101.7 103.1 101.6 104.9 107.5 92.1 101.6 107.6 106.1 100.7 128.1 111.0 85.2 105.4 101.7 100.9 103.2 101.5 105.1 104.0 92.8 101.3 107.7 106.2 100.8 128.3 111.0 87. 2 104.2 101.5 102.4 102.8 100.9 104.2 108.2 88. 8 101.5 107.4 106.0 100.7 127.0 109.2 103.7 103.7 124.6 ‘ 123.1 101.1 100.6 103.7 119.2 99.8 103.3 119.6 99.8 103.3 124.8 99.8 103.2 121.8 99.1 103.1 118.6 99.1 103.0 119.9 99.1 103.1 116.2 99.1 103.2 116.8 99.1 102.7 116.9 99.1 102.9 118.8 99.1 102.5 116.6 99.1 102. 7 116.3 99.1 101.0 113.9 99.1 105.1 105.2 105.1 105.0 105.1 104.7 105.1 104.9 105.0 105.0 105.1 104.9 105.1 104.7 105.1 104.0 105.1 104.6 105.1 104.4 105.1 104.6 104.3 102.9 104.4 103.7 103.5 102.5 105.2 105.2 1 As of January 1961, new weights reflecting 1958 values were introduced into the index. See “ Weight Revisions in the Wholesale Price Index 18901960,” Monthly Labor Review, February 1962, pp. 175-182. 2 As of January 1962, the indexes were converted from the former base of 1947-49=100 to the new base of 1957-59=100. Technical details and earlier data on the 1957-59 base furnished upon request to the Bureau. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Jan. 3 Preliminary. 4 Revised. 5 January 1958=100. 6January 1961 = 100. i Formerly titled “prepared asphalt roofing.” 950 MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 T able D-5. Indexes of wholesale prices for special commodity groupings 1 [1957-59=100, unless otherwise specified]1 1966 Commodity group 1965 June 3 May Apr. Mar. Feb. All foods_______ - ------------ ------ ------------All fish________________________________________ All commodities except farm products____ ___ Textile products, excluding hard and bast fiber products5Bituminous coal—domestic sizes__________________ Refined petroleum products----------------- ------------East Coast markets_____. _______ . . . _____ Midcontinent m arkets____ __ . . . . . . ___ Gulf Coast markets - - - - - - ___ Pacific Coast m arkets__ . . ___ ______ - ____ Midwest markets «____________ Soaps________ . . . ---- ----------- -_ Synthetic detergents-------- --------------------- ----------Pharmaceutical preparations_______ . . ____ Ethical preparations «___________ ________ . Anti-infectives8. . - ____ ____ _____ ____ Anti-arthritics«________________ ________ Sedatives and hypnotics « ____ . . . _ . . Ataractics 6 ________ ______ _________ __ Anti-spasmodics and anti-cholinergics 6_____ Cardiovasculars and anti-hypertensives «_._ Diabetics «_ ____________________________ Hormones 6 _________ ____ _ _____ D iuretics«.. - - - - - _________ ___ Dermatologicals «.-_ _ . ______ ______ _ Hematinics«—- _____ ______ . ____ Analgesics«-.. --------- _ - - - - - - - - - - - Anti-obesity preparations «____________ _ _ ___ Cough and cold preparations «___ Vitam ins«-. ___ - - - - - _____ Proprietary preparations «___ _________________ V itam ins«.. __ __ . . . _ _ _ _ ____ Cough and cold preparations «____ _______ .... Laxatives and elimination aids 6___ Internal analgesics «. — ---------Tonics and alteratives « _ . - ___ External analgesics «.. _ - __________ _ Antiseptics«-. -----------... Antacids «____ - ______ .. ____ Lumber and wood products (excluding millwork)__ Softwood lumber________ ____ Pulp, paper, and allied products (excluding building ___________ ____ paper and board)___ — Special metals and metal products 7______________ Steel mill products____ ____ .. . . ______ Machinery and equipment___ ________ _______ Agricultural machinery (including tractors). . ___ Metalworking machinery. __ _ __ - -- -----______________ . . . . . _ .. All tractors. _ Industrial valves__ ______ . ..................... ............. Industrial fittings__ _ __ _ _ . . . _ _____ __ Anti-friction bearings and components___ ________ Abrasive grinding w h e e l s . _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ Construction materials__________________________ 1 See footnote 1, table D-4. J See footnote 2, table D-4. 3Preliminary. 4 Revised. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Annual average Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sept. Aug. July June 1965 1964 109.0 109.1 127.2 126. S 105.8 4105. 7 98.8 98.7 94.0 4 93.6 100.2 98.4 96.3 96.3 100.2 97.1 104.1 100.7 87.8 89.4 93.3 92.0 113.7 113.7 99.3 99.3 96.6 96.2 93.8 94.1 77.2 78.3 100.6 100.6 118.3 118.3 101.4 101.4 102.3 102.3 94.9 94.9 103.8 103.8 104.1 104.1 100.0 100.0 108.7 108.7 110.6 110.6 105.8 105.8 100.0 100.0 104.9 104.9 88.1 88.1 105.2 103.0 100.3 100.3 103.9 101.2 108.0 107.0 104.4 104.4 100.2 92.8 107.9 105.8 111.0 101.8 103.0 103.0 108.1 4110. 3 107.6 109.0 110.2 126.5 105.3 98.8 92. S 97.7 96. S 97.7 100.2 89.4 89.0 113.7 99.3 96.2 94.1 78.3 100.6 118.3 101.4 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 104.9 88.1 103.0 100.3 101.2 107.0 104.4 92.8 105.8 101.8 103.0 109.0 106.7 110.9 126.7 105.2 98.6 97.7 97.2 98.2 93.7 98.6 89.4 93.3 113.7 99.7 96.5 95.0 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 104.4 88.1 102.2 100.3 100.5 107.0 104.4 92.8 105.8 96.4 102.8 105.3 102.8 110.8 123.2 105.1 98.5 100. C 97.8 98.2 98. t 98.6 86.8 93. S 113.7 99.7 96.5 95.0 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 104.4 88.1 102.1 100.3 99.9 107.0 102.1 92.8 105.8 101.8 102.8 103.0 100.9 108.9 124.5 104.6 98.3 100. C 98.3 98.2 98.5 99.7 88.3 93.8 113.7 99.7 96.5 94.9 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103. 8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 102.1 88.1 102.1 100.3 99.9 107.0 102.1 92.8 105.8 101.8 102.8 102.0 99.9 108.3 119.3 104.2 98.6 99.7 98.4 98.2 98.6 99.7 88.3 93.8 113.1 99.7 96.8 95.0 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100. 0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 104.4 88.1 103.0 100.3 102.4 106.9 102.1 98.2 107.3 102.9 102.8 100.9 99.1 106.7 119.4 103.9 98.7 99.5 98.1 96.6 98.6 99.5 89.0 93.2 113.1 100.8 97.0 95.0 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 104.4 88.1 103.7 100.3 102.4 106.9 102.1 98.2 107.3 108.3 102.8 100.5 99.1 106.0 118.0 103 5 98.9 98.9 96.6 96.6 98.0 96.5 89.0 92.8 112.4 100.8 96.3 94.8 82.3 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 110.6 105.8 100.0 100.7 88.1 101.6 100.3 100.0 106.1 102.1 89.2 105.4 100.1 102.8 100.5 99.8 105.8 116.2 103.4 99.1 97.7 96.4 95.2 97.9 96.5 89.0 92.2 112.3 100.6 95.9 94.7 81.8 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 109.7 105.8 100.0 100.7 88.1 100.9 100.3 98.6 104.9 102.1 87.3 103.4 98.7 102.8 100.9 100.0 104.8 114.3 103.3 99.1 95.6 96.4 93.8 97.3 96.5 91.5 91.6 112.3 100.6 95.9 94.7 81.8 100.6 118.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 109.7 105.8 100.0 100.7 88.1 100.9 100.3 98.6 104.9 102.1 87.3 103.4 98.7 102.8 100.8 99.7 105.6 109.8 103.2 99.4 93.6 96.0 93.8 96.7 95.9 91.5 91.6 112.3 100.6 96.0 94.7 81.9 100.6 113.2 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 104.1 100.0 108.7 109.7 105. 8 100.0 104.4 88.1 101.1 100.3 99.2 104.9 102.1 89.4 103.8 98.7 103.0 99.0 98.4 105.5 108.9 103.1 99.4 93.0 96.0 93.8 96.6 95.9 91.5 91.6 112.3 100.6 96.0 94.6 81.9 100.6 113.2 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 100.6 100.0 108.7 109.7 105.8 100.0 104.4 88.1 101.2 100.3 99.2 104.9 102.5 89.4 103.8 98.7 103.0 98.7 98.4 104.5 112.8 102.9 99.1 96.6 95.9 95.3 97.6 95.1 90.6 91.7 112.3 100.5 96.5 94.7 82.0 100.6 115.3 100.0 102.3 94.9 103.8 102.3 100.0 108.7 110.0 105. 5 100.0 102.9 88.1 102.7 100.3 100.9 106.0 102.3 95.0 105.2 104.9 102.9 99.8 99.1 100.8 107.4 101.2 98.9 96.7 92.7 93.6 89.7 94.0 87.4 88.0 107.1 99.6 97.1 95.4 85.4 100.6 113.3 100.0 100.2 97.6 103.8 100.6 100.0 108.7 108.8 101.8 100.0 103.5 87.7 103.1 100.3 101.0 105.4 102.2 100.2 103.1 108.6 103.0 98.9 99.3 103.4 106.9 104.5 108.1 120.0 124.3 119.8 116.7 93.9 83.1 93.3 104.8 102.7 106.5 104.3 107.2 119.9 121.1 119.4 114.0 92.9 83.0 93.3 104.3 102.2 106.3 104.3 106.9 119.8 120.9 119.4 110.5 92.9 83.0 93.3 103.2 101.7 106.0 104.2 106.5 119.6 120.7 119.1 109.4 92.9 83.0 93.3 102.4 101.5 105.7 104.1 106.0 119.1 120.0 118.8 109.3 91.9 84.0 93.3 101.9 101.2 105.4 103.9 105.7 118.7 119.5 118.6 108.9 91.9 83.7 93.3 101.4 101.1 105.4 103.6 105.5 118. 5 119.3 118.4 109.4 91.9 83.7 93.4 101.3 100.8 105.1 103.7 105.2 116.4 119.1 116.9 108.6 91.9 83.7 93.4 101.2 100.3 105.1 103.5 105.1 116.5 118.8 116.8 106.6 91.4 83.7 93.9 101.2 100.2 105.1 103.5 105.0 116.4 118.2 116.8 105.1 91.4 83.7 93.9 101.2 100.2 104.8 103.4 104.9 116.5 117.0 116.8 105.2 89.3 83.7 93.9 100.8 100.3 104.9 103.2 105.0 116.2 116.8 116.4 4105.6 88.3 83.9 94.0 100.7 100.2 104.7 103.3 105.0 116.6 117.4 116.8 105.7 90.8 84.1 94.2 100.8 99.3 102.6 102.8 103.8 114.3 112.6 114.4 107.2 92.7 89.0 96.1 99.6 103.1 106.8 104.3 4107. 8 119.9 4122. 8 119.8 4115. 7 93.9 83.0 93.3 105.1 s Formerly titled “textile products, excluding hard fiber products.” « New series. January 1961 = 100. 7 Metals and metal products, agricultural machinery and equipment, and motor vehicles. D.—CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES T able D-6. 951 Indexes of wholesale prices,1 by stage of processing and durability of product [1957-59=100] 2 1966 Commodity group June3 May Apr. Mar. All commodities________________________________ 1965 Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Annual average Oct. Sept . Aug. July June 1965 1964 105.7 4105. 6 105.5 105.4 105.4 104.6 104.1 103.5 103.1 103.0 102.9 102.9 102.8 102.5 100.5 105.5 105.7 106.3 106.9 107.5 105.2 103.2 100.8 100.1 100.0 100.8 100.5 100. 6 105.9 106.5 107.5 108.3 109.6 106.8 104.1 100.7 100.1 100.0 101.1 100.9 101.0 105.1 104.5 104.5 104.6 103.8 102.2 101.3 100.7 100.1 99.9 100.0 99.6 99. 8 105.4 104.7 104.7 104.8 104.0 102.2 101.2 100.6 99.8 99.7 99.8 99.3 99.6 98. 9 98 3 99 8 94 1 91 9 97 8 Stage of processing Crude materials for further processing_____ _ ____ Crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs _____ _ Crude nonfood materials except fuel. Crude nonfood materials, except fuel, for manufacturing______________ Crude nonfood materials, except fuel, for construction-. „ .......... __________ Crude f u e l_________ ____ Crude fuel for manufacturing . . . . _____ Crude fuel for nonmanufacturing___________ Intermediate materials, supplies, and components___ Intermediate materials and components for manu facturing__ _ _______________ ____ ___ Intermediate materials for food manufacturing. Intermediate materials for nondurable m anu facturing.. _ . . _____ ___ Intermediate materials for durable manu facturing.. .. ___ . . ____ Components for manufacturing____________ Materials and components for construction___ Processed fuels and lub rican ts.._ _ _____ _____ Processed fuels and lubricants for manufac turing. ______________________________ Processed fuels and lubricants for nonmanu facturing.. ____ ... ___ Containers, nonreturn able_____ ___ _ Supplies____ _ „ __ _ _ __ Supplies for manufacturing________________ Supplies for nonmanufacturing_____________ Manufactured animal feeds________.. _ .... Other supplies___ Finished goods (goods to users, including; raw foods and f u e ls ) ..___ ___________ . Consumer finished goods___________________ Consumer foods... . Consumer crude foods______________ Consumer processed foods___________ Consumer other nondurable goods_________ Consumer durable goods__________________ Producer finished goods______________ Producer finished goods for manufacturing. Producer finished goods for nonmanufacturing. 99 s 97 4 103.1 101. 7 101. 6 101.9 103. 2 103.3 103. 2 103.5 102 8 102 ñ 102 4 104.9 104.8 104.3 103.9 103.8 103.4 103.0 103.0 102.6 102.5 102.4 102.3 102.2 104.2 4104.1 103.7 103.4 103.2 102.8 102.6 102.5 102.4 102.2 102.1 102.0 101. 9 109.9 109.8 110.1 110.8 111. 1 109.7 108.8 108.1 107.5 106.9 106.5 106.2 105. 9 100.0 99.7 99.4 99.2 99.0 98.9 98.9 98.8 98.9 98.7 98.7 98.7 98. 7 102. 2 100 9 102. 0 100 0 100 4 104 0 106.7 105.0 104.5 101.8 106.6 106.1 105. 8 105.5 105.2 105.3 105.1 105.1 105.0 104.8 104. 8 104.1 103.3 102.9 102.5 102.3 102.2 101.9 101.6 101.6 101.4 101. 4 104.3 103.4 102.7 102.3 101.9 101.8 101.7 101.7 101.7 101.3 101. 2 100.3 99.8 100.2 100.7 100.9 100.8 99.9 99.8 99.9 99. 7 99. 8 104 6 101. 3 101.4 99 5 102 S 99 7 100 6 98.1 102.8 101.9 101.7 101.2 101.5 101.9 102.1 102.0 101.3 101.2 101.2 101.0 101. 1 100.2 98.7 105.1 105.1 110.2 109.5 109.2 4108.9 109.9 109.2 117.4 116.0 103.4 4103.0 103.6 105.1 105.1 105.3 4103. 7 105.0 105. C 105.2 4106.8 4104.8 104.8 100.7 106.4 106.2 105.7 105.6 109.5 109.6 99.3 4 99.9 111. 1 111.1 104.9 104.5 100.1 100.2 107.9 107.6 111.2 110.8 104.5 4104.4 103.9 104.0 103.9 104.2 103.8 105.2 105.1 105.5 103.8 105.9 105.8 106.2 103.6 105.6 105.5 105.9 103.4 105.4 105.3 105.7 103.4 104.8 104.7 105.0 103.4 104.3 104.3 104.6 103.2 103.7 103.7 103.9 103.2 102.7 102.7 103.0 103.1 101.9 101.8 102.1 98 7 10 2 .8 97 8 101. 0 99 8 97.4 104.8 108.0 108.0 107.4 112.7 102.3 97.9 104.3 109.3 107.7 109.3 117.7 102.1 98.7 104.2 108.2 107.3 108.0 114.8 101.9 98.8 104.1 107.0 106.6 106.6 111.7 101.6 98.7 103.3 107.2 106.5 106.9 113.1 101.2 97.5 102.9 106.3 106.6 105.5 109.6 101.1 97.5 102.8 106.3 106.4 105.6 110.1 101.0 97.6 102.4 106.2 106.3 105.5 110.1 100.8 97.5 102,2 106. 5 106.2 106.1 111.9 100. 7 97. 5 102. 4 106.1 105 9 105. 5 109.9 100. 9 97.1 102.1 106 0 106 1 105.4 109. 7 100. 9 100 2 105 0 105 S 104 2 107 4 100 4 106.3 106.4 105.9 106.1 110.7 111.5 4107.8 4107. 6 111.2 112.1 104.3 104.1 99.8 99.7 107.0 106.8 110.0 109.8 103.8 103.7 106.3 106.0 111.5 105.6 112.4 104.0 99.7 106.6 109.6 103.5 105. 6 105.2 109. 5 101.0 110.8 103.9 99.7 106.2 109.1 103.3 105.3 104.9 108.9 102.6 109.9 103.7 99.6 106.0 108.8 103. 2 104.7 104.2 107.2 102.7 107.8 103.6 99.6 105.9 108.7 103.1 104.3 103.7 106.3 101.0 107.1 103.3 99.5 105.6 108.4 102.8 104.1 103.5 106.1 101.2 106.9 103.0 99.5 105. 5 108.3 102.8 103.8 103.1 105.3 94.4 107.0 102.8 99.5 105.5 108.1 102.8 104.0 103.4 106.0 98.8 107.1 102.7 99.6 105. 4 107 9 102.9 103. 9 103.2 105. 6 99.6 106. 6 102. 6 99.7 105.4 107. 8 103.0 103.6 102.8 104.5 100 2 105.2 102.8 99.6 105.4 108 0 102 ! 9 101 8 100 9 100 6 99 8 100 7 101 6 99 9 104 1 106 2 102 I 0 104.9 105.5 104.9 104.8 104.8 107.5 111.4 107.3 104.6 104.5 104.4 104.5 104.3 105.3 108.2 105.1 104.2 103.9 104.1 104.2 103.8 104.0 105.4 104.0 104.2 102.9 103.7 104.2 103.2 102.4 106.5 102.2 104.0 102.4 103.4 104.0 102.7 101.7 105.3 101.5 103.9 102.2 103.2 103.9 102.5 101.6 104.6 101.4 103.9 102.0 103.2 103.9 102.4 101.3 105.7 101.1 103.7 102.2 103.1 103.7 102.5 101.5 103.6 101.4 103.7 102.0 103.0 103.7 102.3 101.6 105.4 101.4 103.7 101.5 102.8 103. 7 101.9 100. 7 104.7 ICO. 5 10 2 .4 9 9 .1 1 0 1 .1 10 2 .5 97.9 105.1 108.3 108.3 107.6 112.4 102.8 95 9 Durability of product Total durable goods... . ____ . . . . . Total nondurable goods._ ___ _ _ . . . . Total manufactures_______________ . Durable m anufactures.. Nondurable manufactures_________________ Total raw or slightly processed goods. Durable raw or slightly processed goods____ Nondurable raw or slightly processed goods... 1 See footnote 1, table D-4. 2 See footnote 2, table D-4. 3 Preliminary. 4 Revised. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 106.2 106.1 105.2 105.0 105. 6 105. 5 106.1 4106.1 105.1 104.8 105.7 4105.8 112.4 110.1 105.3 4105. 6 105.7 105.1 105.1 105.6 104.6 107.0 113.9 106.6 105.3 105.3 105.0 105.1 104.7 107.3 114.7 106.9 99. 7 9 7 .5 98. 0 97.5 N ote: For description of the series by stage of processing, see “New BLS Economic Sector Indexes of Wholesale Prices,” Monthly Labor Review, December 1955, pp. 1448-1453; and by durability of product and data begin ning with 1947, see Wholesale Prices and Price Indexes, 1957 (BLS Bulletin 1235, 1958). MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, AUGUST 1966 952 E.—Work Stoppages T able E -l. Work stoppages resulting from labor-management disputes 1 Number of stoppages M onth and year Beginning in month or year Workers involved in stoppages In effect dur ing month Beginning in month or year In effect dur ing m onth Man-days idle during month or year Percent of estimated working time Number January----- ---------. . ------------------ - ---------------February____ ____ _____ ________ ____ . . . _____ -- ---- ---March________ _ April__ ______ ______ ____ ______ - - - ---------M ay_________ ______ _______ --- ------------June______________ ________ _____________ ____ July_________ _____________ ______— --------August _____________________________________ September-------- ------------------------ -------------------October.. . -------- ------- -------- ---------------------November_______________________________ ____ December------ ------------------------------------------------ 2,862 3,573 4,750 4,985 3,693 3,419 3,606 4,843 4,737 5,117 5,091 3,468 4,320 3,825 3,673 3,694 3,708 3,333 3,367 3,614 3,362 3,655 211 233 241 364 442 376 416 306 336 346 238 146 1966: January_____________ _______ ______________ _ F ebruary.. . ------------- --------------------------M arch. --------- ----------- ------------------------------ -April____________________ . -- ______________ M ay__ ________________ - — — — ------June. _____________________________ ___ _____ July________________________________________ August___________ _ . . ------------- _ __ September___________________________________ October-------------- ----------------- . . . - . ---N ovem ber... _____________________ _________ December------------------------- ------ -- 244 208 329 390 450 425 416 388 345 321 289 158 404 393 511 603 669 677 702 685 631 570 505 371 98, 800 45,100 180, 000 141,000 127,000 268, 000 156,000 109,000 155,000 101,000 140, 000 24,300 183,000 149, 000 274,000 194, 000 201,000 354,000 334,000 229,000 250,000 209,000 192,000 75,800 1,740,000 1, 440,000 1, 770, 000 1,840,000 1,850, 000 2, 590,000 3, 670,000 2,230,000 2,110, 000 1, 770, 000 1, 380, 000 907,000 .18 .15 . 16 .17 .19 .23 .34 .20 .20 .16 .13 .08 1966: January 2__ _ _________ . __________________ F ebruary2------------------ . . . ----------March 2______ . __________ . . . . ------A pril2_______________________________________ May 2_______ _________ _____________ — June 2_______________________________________ 205 240 310 350 480 430 335 380 450 500 640 660 101, 000 107, 000 198, 000 228, 000 208,000 150, 000 127, 000 142, 000 236, 000 379,000 294, 000 243, 000 1,000, 000 865, 000 1,350,000 2,450,000 2,870,000 1,950, 000 .09 .09 .11 .23 .26 . 17 1935— 39 (avpragf*) 1947-49 (avp.ragp) _ - - _____ - - -- -_ _ ___________ ______ _ 1946 1947 _ ____________ - ___ - - ___ ____________________________ _____ 1949 ________________________________ 1Q51 _ _ _________________ 1953 1954 1955 _ 1956 1957 1958 1959 I960 1961 1962 . 1963 . _____ _ _ _______ __ __ _ __ __ _________ ________ ________ _______________________________________ _ ___________________________ ____ _ ____________________ _______ _ _ _ ___________ _ _ ___ __ _______ _ ________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ ___ _ _ ____________ __ _______ ___ ___________________________________ . . ______ . . . ____ - _____ _______ i The data include all known strikes or lockouts involving 6 workers or more and lasting a full day or shift or longer. Figures on workers involved and man-days idle cover all workers made idle for as long as 1 shift in estab lishments directly involved in a stoppage. They do not measure the indirect https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ____________ _________ ___________ 375 375 399 529 651 586 639 556 574 584 469 346 1,130,000 2,380,000 3,470,000 4,600,000 2,170,000 1,960,000 _____________ 3,030,000 2,410,000 _____________ 2,220, 000 3,540,000 _____________ 2,400,000 1,530,000 2,650, 000 1,900, 000 1,390,000 2,060,000 1,880, 000 1,320,000 1,450, 000 1, 230,000 941,000 1, 640,000 91,400 53,300 80, 600 116, 000 79, 300 123,000 140, 000 187,000 192, 000 249,000 222,000 124,000 126,000 195, 000 73,100 133, 000 432, 000 374,000 214,000 549,000 141,000 274,000 42,000 149, 000 16,900,000 39,700,000 38,000,000 116,000,000 34,600,000 34,100,000 50, 500,000 38,800,000 22,900,000 59,100,000 28,300,000 22,600,000 28,200,000 33,100,000 16,500,000 23,900,000 69,000,000 19,100,000 16,300,000 18,600,000 16,100,000 22,900,000 898,000 1,040, 000 816,000 1,170,000 2,400,000 1, 900,000 1, 740,000 1,200,000 2,390,000 6,590,000 1, 730,000 1,060,000 0.27 .46 .47 1.43 .41 .37 .59 .44 .23 .57 .26 .21 .26 .29 .14 .22 .61 .17 .14 .16 .13 .18 .09 .11 .08 .11 .24 .18 .15 .12 .23 .61 .17 .10 or secondary effect on other establishments or industries whose employees are made idle as a result of material or service shortages. 2 Preliminary. U .S . G O V E R N M E N T P R IN T IN G O F F IC E : 1 9 6 6 O---- 224-966 New Publications Available For Sale Order sale publications from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office’ Washington, D.C. 20402. Send check or money order, payable to the Superintendent of Documents. Currency sent at sender’s risk. Copies may also be purchased from any of the Bureau’s regional offices. (See inside front cover for the addresses of these offices.) BLS Bulletin 1425-6: Major Collective Bargaining Agreements: Arbitration Procedures. 167 pp. $1 BLS Bulletin 1430-83: Wages and Related Benefits: Part II, Metropolitan Areas, United States and Regional Summaries, 1964-65. 122 pp. 60 cents. Area Wage Surveys: BLS Bulletins— 1465-55: South Bend, Ind., Metropolitan Area, March 1966. 30 pp. 25 cents. 1465-56: Birmingham, Ala., Metropolitan Area, April 1966. 20 pp. 20 cents. 1465-57: Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind., Metropolitan Area, March 1966. 32 pp. 25 cents. 1465-58: Canton, Ohio, Metropolitan Area, April 1966. 30 pp. 25 cents. 1465-59: Los Angeles-Long Beach and Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, Calif., Metropolitan Area, March 1966. 38 pp. 30 cents. 1465-60: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N.Y ., Metropolitan Area, April 1966. 31 pp. 25 cents. 1465-62: Phoenix, Ariz., Metropolitan Area, March 1966. 30 pp. 25 cents. 1465-63: Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange, Tex., Metropolitan Area, May 1966. 30 pp. 25 cents. BLS Bulletin 1479: Wage Chronology: International Shoe Co., 1945-66. 18 pp. 20 cents. BLS Bulletin 1483: Financing Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plans. 19 pp. 20 cents. BLS Bulletin 1488: Union Wages and Hours: Motortruck Drivers and Helpers, July 1, 1965 and Trend 1936-65. 36 pp. 30 cents. BLS Bulletin 1489: Union Wages and Hours: Printing Industry, July 1, 1965 and Trend 1907-65. 59 pp. 40 cents. BLS Bulletin 1493: Directory of National and International Labor Unions in the United States, 1965. 100 pp. 55 cents. BLS Bulletin 1494: Wage Chronology: Anthracite Mining Industry, 1930-66. 15 pp. 20 cents. BLS Bulletin 1496: Industry Wage Survey, Wood Household Furniture, Except Upholstered, May-June 1965. 60 pp. 40 cents. BLS Bulletin 1498: Industry Wage Survey, Nonferrous Foundries, June-July 1965. 52 pp. 40 cents. BLS Bulletin 1511: The Negroes in the United States: Their Economic and Social Situation. 241 pp $1.25. For Lim ited Free Distribution Single copies of the reports listed below are furnished without cost as long as supplies permit. Write to Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20212, or to any of the Bureau’s regional offices. (See inside front cover for the addresses of these offices.) Survey of Consumer Expenditures, 1960-61: Consumer Expenditures and Income: BLS Reports— 237-89: Total Northeastern Region, Urban and Rural. Supplement 2. 94 pp. Supplement 3— Pt. A. 165 pp. 237-90: Total North Central Region, Urban and Rural. Supplement 2. 94 pp. 237-91: Total Southern Region, Urban and Rural. Supplement 2. 94 pp. 237-92: Total Western Region, Urban and Rural. Supplement 2. 94 pp. 237-93: Total United States, Urban and Rural. Supplement 2. 94 pp. Supplement 3— Pt. A. 165 pp. BLS Report 302: How to Establish Current Reporting of Employment, Hours, and Earnings in Developing Countries. 150 pp. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WUMA200EPUBLIC UBRARV o j c; S ROSE KAUMAZOO U n it e d G o v e r n m e n t P r in t in g O f f i c e D IV IS IO N W OF P U B L IC a s h in g to n , DOCUMENTS D.C. 20402 OFFICIAL B U SIN ESS https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Ml ch H9006 POSTAGE AND U.S. G O V E R N M E N T FEES PA ID P R IN T IN G O FFIC E