The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
SI LVER. SPEECH OF HON. JO H N SHERM AN, O F O H IO , IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES JUNE 5, 1890. W AS H I NG T ON . 1890. SPEECH OF HON. JOHN SHEEMAN. The Senate, as in Committee o f the Whole, having under consideration the bill (S. 2350) authorizing the issue o f Treasury notes on deposits of silver bullion— Mr. SHERMAN said: Mr. P k e s id e n t: If no Senator on the other side of the Chamber de sires to address the Senate, I will avail myself of this opportunity, though I did not intend to speak upon this question until a later stage, when we had some bill supported by somebody tb debate. The bill that was reported from the Committee on Finance seems to me like an uneasy ghost, wandering without an owner or a father, without com pass or without guide, with no 6ne to call for a vote, and no one to de mand a solution of the difficult question with which it assumes to deal. Still, as I am compelled to be absent from the Senate Chamber on other important business o f the Senate, I will avail myself of this oppor tunity to say what I have to say rather than at some future time, when it may interfere more with the public business. I approach the discussion of this bill and the kindred bills and amendments pending in the two Houses with unaffected diffidence. No problem is submitted to us of equal importance and difficulty. Our action will affect the value of all the property of the people o f the United States, and the wages of labor of every kind, and our trade and commerce with all the world. In the consideration of such a question We should not be controlled by previous opinions or bound by local in terests, but with the lights of experience and full knowledge of all the complicated facts involved, give to the subject the best judgment which imperfect human nature allows. With the wide diversity of opinion that prevails, each of us must make concessions in ordet to secure such a measure as will accomplish the objects sought for without impairing the public credit or the general interests of our people. This is no time for visionary theories of political economy. We must deal w|th facts as we find them and not as we wish them. We must aim at re sults based upon practical experience, for what has been probably will be. The best prophet of the future is the past. To know what measures ought to be adopted we should have a clear conception of what we wish to accomplish. I believe a majority of the Senate desire, first, to provide an increase of money to meet the increas ing wants of our rapidly growing country and population, and to supply the reduction in our circulation caused by the retiring of national-bank notes; second, to increase the market value of silver not only in theUnited States but in the world, in the belief that this is essential to the sue- 4: cess of any measure proposed, and in the hope that our efforts will ad vance silver to its legal ratio with gold, and induce the great commer cial nations to join with us in maintaining the legal parity of the two metals, or in agreeing with us in a new ratio o f their relative value; and third, to secure a genuine bimetallic standard, one that will not demonetize gold or cause it to be hoarded or exported, but that will es tablish both gold and silver as standards of value not only in the United States but among all the civilized nations of the world. Believing that these are the chief objects aimed at by us all, and that we differ only as to the best means to obtain them, I will discuss the pending propositions to test how far they tend, in my opinion, to promote or defeat these objects. And, first, as to the amount of currency necessary to meet the wants o f the people. The paper money in actual circulation, which is the act ive money in nearly all domestic transactions in the United States, consisted of the following items on the 1st day of May, 1890: Legal-tender United States notes......................................................... Certificates o f deposit............................................................................. Gold certificates Uess amount held in Treasury)............ .................. Silver certificates (less amount held in Treasury)............................. Old demand notes.................................................................................... Fractional currency................................................................................ National-bank notes............................................................................... $346,881, 016 8,795,000 134,642,839 292,923,348 56,442 6,912,549 189,442,472 T o ta l..... ......................................................................................... 979,453,667 The aggregate o f $979,000,000 is subject to a reduction of notes lost or destroyed by the casualties o f time, o f which it is hard to make an estimate. The fractional currency and demand notes may be consid ered as out of circulation, though a part of them will be presented for redemption. Tbe gold and silver certificates, being of recent origin, may be counted as outstanding. The United States notes have been in circulation for twenty-seven years. The estimated loss, according to the present Treasurer of the United States, is about %per cent. The loss of bank-notes inures to the benefit of the United States and is estimated to equal or exceed that of United States notes. I f these es timates can be relied on the volume of currency is diminished by lost notes about $12,000,000 leaving of paper money outstanding $967,000 , 000. But it must be remembered that of the $189,000,000 o f national-bank notes outstanding, $60,521,556 is in process of redemption and cancel lation, and that the same amount of lawful money is held in the Treas ury to redeem these notes. It is manifest that both sums should not be counted as in circulation, thus reducing the aggregate of paper cir culation to $907,000,000. To this must be added the gold and silver now in circulation, As to silver coin, it can be stated with substantial accuracy as follows: Standard silver dollars in circulation October 1, 1889........... ............... $57,554,100 Subsidiary silver coin in circulation October 1,1889............................. 52,931,352 110,485,452 As to gold coin in circulation, the estimate of the Secretary of the Treasury at the same date, October 1, 1889, was $375,947,715, and his estimate of total circulation at that date was $1,405,018,000. While some of these estimated items, especially that of gold in circu lation, may be subject to many grains of allowance, it* is reasonably certain that the current money in use ip the United States is now about $1,400,000,000. In this sum I do not include the gold and silver coin in the Treasury represented by certificates in circulation. And it must SHEE 5 be remembered that much of this sum of $1,400,000,000 is held in the Treasury and in banks as reserves required by law. Is this volume of current money sufficient ior the foreign and do mestic exchanges of the people of the United States? I concede that, by reason of the great extent of our country, its vast diversified pro ductions, its increasing population, and the push and energy ol our people, they need a larger circulating medium than an equal number in an older and more densely populated country. But nowhere else are the substitutes for money better understood and in more general use. From a table for the first time compiled in the year 1881 from actual returns from all the national banks, it was found that the receipts o f those banks upon a single day were $295,000,000, while the receipts o f the banks in New York and Chicago were more than one-half of that amount. These data also show that the proportion of gold coin re ceived was less than 1} per cent.; of silver, less than one-fourth of 1 percent.; of paper money less than 5 per cent., and of checks and drafts about 95 per cent., while the proportion of the receipts of the banks in New York City was more than 98 per cent, in checks and drafts, and less than 2 per cent, in coin and paper. * I f the daily receipts or payments of the banks of the country were to be made ex clusively of gold and silver coin, the total coinage of the year, amount ing to $60,000,000, which kept employed in its manufacture the whole force of .the Mint of the country (consisting ot a small regiment of men) during the entire year, would be sufficient only to supply the banks of the country in making payments for one-third of a bank day, or one hour and forty minutes, so that the money of the country has very lit tle proportion to the business of the country. The total amount o f coin manufactured at the mints in a year, if used exclusively in making payments, would be exhausted by the na tional banks of New York and Chicago in less than a single day. The whole o f the coin and currency of the country now in circulation, $1,400,000,000, would supply the national banks of the country, if their payments were made exclusively in coin and currency, for five days only. The table referred to is as follows: Table from report o f the Comptroller o f Currency fo r 1881, showing total receipts and proportions o f gold coin, silver coin, paper money, and checks and drafts. [In this table are shown both for June 30 and for September 17, the propor tions of gold coin, silver coin, paper money, and checks and drafts, including clearing-house certificates, to the total receipts in New Y ork City, in the other reserve cities, and in banks elsewhere, separately, and also the same proportions for the United States.] June 30,1881. Proportions. Localities. Num ber of banks. Receipts. Gold coin. Checks, Paper Silver coin. currency. drafts, etc. Per cent. Per cent. Per cent. New Y ork City....... Other reserve cities.. Banks elsewhere.... United States.... SH E R 16 $167,437,759 187 77,100,715 40,175,542 1,731 0.27 0.76 2.04 0.01 0.15 0.77 1.02 4.71 15.47 1,966 0.65 0.16 4.06 284,714,016 Per cenl. 98.70 94. 38 81.72 95.13 6 Table from report o f the Comptroller o f Currency fo r 1881, etc.—Cont’ d. September 17,1881. Proportions. Localities. Num ber of banks. Receipts. New York City....... Other reserve cities.. Banks elsewhere.... 48 389 4,895 8165,193,347 77,922,247 52,118,185 0.54 1.86 3.31 0.01 0.18 0.08 0.65 5.61 14.27 98.80 92.35 81.74 United States ... 2,132 295,233,779 1.38 0.17 4.36 94.00 Gold coin. Paper Checks, Silver coin. currency. drafts, etc. Per ccnt. Per cent.' Per cent. Per cent. This table shows the proportions of money of different kinds, checks, drafts, etc., that are paid in the ordinary business o f the country, show ing that the actual circulation plays a very insignificant part in the business of this country. Besides, the use o f banks and banking institutions of every grade and degree is more common in the United States than anywhere else. In every town of any importance in the United States there are banks of issue or banks of exchange or banking offices or saving banks or in stitutions of a similar character for the care and deposit of money in the transaction of monetary business, greater in number and in aggre gate than all the institutions of the kind in Europe. Thus there has grown into the customs of the country the use of credit money in the form of drafts, checks, and certificates to a far greater extent than anywhere else, leaving money in circulation to transact only the smaller business o f the country. The best way to test the sufficiency of this sum of $1,400,000,000 to conduct the business of our country is to compare the volume of the currency to-day with that of former periods. In making this compar ison I do not take a period before the war when we had practically no national currency but gold and silver coin, and that in comparatively very small amounts. This was at a time when a great party was dom inant which denied the power of the United States to issue any form of paper money, and under the pretense of States’ rights crippled the Government of many of the essential rights of a nation, and left to the several States the imperial right to issue paper money through private corporations. It is a marvel that the country grew into such propor tions with a currency so vicious, insecure, insufficient, and at times worthless, as State-bank paper money. It did grow in spite of it, but no student o f American history would propose a recurrence to such a policy. Our currency was then the worst existing in any commercial nation, but the necessities of the war and more liberal opinions as to the powers and functions of the National Government led to restrictions upon State paper money and the adoption of national paper money, which is now conceded by the most advanced nations as the best ever devised by man. Let us take a period when this national policy was well established. On the 1st o f March, 1878, before resumption, and at the date of the passage of the silver act, the aggregate currency in circulation was $805,793,807, including $80,000,000 of gold, or $6^0,000,000 less than now, being $16.50 per capita, while now it is $22 per capita. SHEU 7 On the 1st o f October, 1880, after resumption, and at a time o f great prosperity, the total amount of paper money in circulation, exclusive of that held in the Treasury, was $690,430,147, as follows: United States notes........................................................................... ....... $329,417,403 National-bank notes.................................................... .............................. 340,329,453 Silver certificates................................................ .................................... 12,203,191 Gold certificates........................................................................... ............. 7,480,100 690,430,147 This included only $12,200,000 of silver certificates and $7,480,000 gold certificates. Now we have $292,000,000 o f silver certificates and $134,000,000 gold certificates, but the national-bank circulation was then $344,505,427 and is now $189,000,000. Daring all this period the volume of money in actual circulation was increasing. I here present a table showing that each and every year from 1878 to this year the currency of the country in actual circulation has been increasing year by year more than the population has in creased. Mr. TELLER. W ill the Senator tell us how much it actually in creased last year ? Mr. SHERMAN. The statement-----Mr. TELLER. I challenge the statement that the Senator makes, and 1 want him now to tell us. Mr. SHERMAN. I know the Senator challenges everything, but I take this from the Treasury report, the highest authority we can quote in this country. Here is the table-----Mr. TELLER. I f the Senator will allow me, I will call his atten tion to the fact that the Secretary’s report shows that the circulation increased last season less than $8,000,000, and that certainly does not bear out his statement that it has increased as fast as the population. Mr. SHERMAN. I do not think this way of interrupting an argu ment a very good one, but I think the Senator is not correct. I have the statement here before me, and I will read it to him, although I did not intend to weary the Senate with going over all these figures. The increase each year, in the different kinds of money, is exhibited in the following table: The amount and kinds o f money in actual circulation on certain dates fro m 1878 to 1889. S 1S B Total circula tion. Gold coin. Standard sil ver dollars. $805,793,807 862,579,7';4 1,022,033,685 1,147,892,435 1,188,752,363 1,236,650,032 1,261,569,924 1,286,630,871 1,264,889,561 1,353,485,690 1,384,340,280 1,405,018,000 $82,530,163 123,698,157 261,320,920 328,118,146 358,351,956 346,077,784 341,485,840 348,268,740 364,894,599 391,090,890 377,329,865 375,947,715 $11,074,230 22,914,075 32,230,038 33,801,231 39,783,527 40,322,042 45,275,710 60,170,793 60,614,524 57,959,356 57,554,100 Subsidiary silver. $53,573,833 54,088,747 48,368,543 47,859,327 47,153,750 48,170,263 45,344,717 51,328,206 48,176,838 50,414,706 52,020,975 52,931,352 8 The amount and kinds o f money in actual circulation on certain dates from 1878 to 1889— Continued. Year. Date. 1878 1879 1880 1881..... 1882 ,, 1883 1884 , , 1885 . 1886 1887 1888 1889 March 1 ....... October 1..... October 1..... October 1 .... October 1..... October 1..... October 1..... October 1 ... October 1..... October 1..... October 1..... October 1 Gold certifi cates. Silver cer tificates. $44,364,100 14,843, 200 7, 480,100 5,2.39,320 4,907,440 55,014, 940 87, 389, 660 118,137,790 84, 691, 807 97,984, 683 134,838,190 116,675,349 $1,176,720 12, 203,191 52,590,180 63,204,780 78,921,961 96,4yl, 251 93,656,716 95,387,112 154,354,826 218,561,601 276,619,715 United States Nationalnotes.* bank notes. $311,436,971 327,747,762 32^,417,403 327,655,884 325,272,858 321,356,596 325,786,143 318,736,684 310,161,935 329,070,804 306,052,053 325,510,758 $313,888,740 329,950,938 340,329,453 354,199,540 356,060,348 347,324,961 324,750,271 311,227,025 301, 406, 477 269, 955,257 237,578,240 199,779,011 ♦Includes outstanding clearing-house certificates o f the act of June 8,1872. Mr. President, this is the best information we can have, and if we can not rely upon the official reports of the officers of the Government, what can we rely upon ? What newspaper scrap should be brought here to face down figures like these ? Mr. TELLER. I f the Senator will allow me, I will-----The PRESIDENT p ro tempore. Does the Senator from Ohio yield ? Mr. SHERMAN. I do not like to yield, and I do not like to refuse. Mr. TELLER. I do not want that statement to go out uncontra dicted. Mr. SHERMAN. Since the Senator takes it in that way, I will go on. Mr. TELLER. Very well; I will contradict it by the record when the Senator gets through. Mr. SHERMAN. That is a great deal better, and it is a much more orderly way of proceeding in the Senate. It is a fact that there has been a constant increase of currency. It is a fact which must be constantly borne in mind. If any evils now exist such as have been so often stated, such as falling prices, increased mortgages, contentions between capital and labor, decreasing value of silver, increased relative value of gold, they must be attributed to some other cause than our insufficient supply of circulation, for not only has the circulation increased in these twelve years 80 per cent., while our population has only increased 36 per cent., but it has all been maintained at the gold standard, which, it is plain, has been greatly advanced in purchasing power. I f the value of money is tested by its amount, by numerals, according to the favorite theory of the Sen ator from Nevada [Mr. J o n e s ] , then surely we ought to be on the high road of prosperity, for these numerals have increased in twelve years from $805,000,000 to $1,405,000,000 in October last, and to 1,4*20,000,000 on the 1st of this month. This single fact disposes of the claim that insufficient currency is the cause of the woes, real and imaginary, that have been depicted, and compel us to look to other causes for the evils complained of I admit that prices for agricultural productions have been abnor mally low, and that the farmers of the United States have suffered greatly from this cause. But this depression of prices is easily accounted for by the greatly increased amount of agricultural production, the won derful development of agrieul tural implements, the opening of vast regions of new and fertile fields in the West, the reduced cost of trans portation, the doubling of the miles of railroads, and the quadrupling SHER 9 capacity of railroads and steam-boats for transportation, and the new fangled forms of trusts and combinations which monopolize nearly all the productions of the farms and workshops ol our country, reducing the price to the producer and in some cases increasing the cost to the consumer. All these causes co-operate to reduce prices of farm prod ucts. No one of them can be traced to an insufficient currency, now larger in amount in proportion to population than ever before in our history. But to these causes of (a domestic character must be added others, over which we have no control. The same wonderful development of industry has been going on in other parts of the globe. In Russia, es pecially in Southern Russia, vast regions have been opened to the com merce o f the world. Railroads have been built, mines have been opened, exhaustless supplies of petroleum have been found, and all these are competitors with us in supplying the wants of Europe for food, metals, heat, and light. India, with its teeming millions of poorly paid labor ers, is competing with our farmers, and their products are transported to market over thousands of miles of railroads constructed by English capital, or by swift steamers through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, reaching directly the people of Europe whom we formerly supplied with food. No wonder, then, that our agriculture is depressed by low prices, caused by competition by new rivals and agencies. Any one who can overlook these causes and attribute low prices to a want of domestic currency, that has increased and is increasing con tinually, must be blind to the great forces that in recent times through out the world are tending by improved methods and modern inven tions to lessen the prices of all commodities. A surplus of a very small percentage o f an article that will perish within a year, as a mat ter of course, depreciates the value of the whole stock on hand. It is very unlike the effect upon an article of permanent and enduring value like the metals. The reasons why the products of labor have cheap ened in price are thus forcibly stated by C. P. Williams in a recent number of Rhodes’s Journal of Banking: The advance in the wages o f labor proves that gold has not appreciated. And the wages o f labor h ave advanced at the same time that the products o f labor have cheapened in price. Why, the past half century, afid more particularly the past quarter century, has revolutionized commerce and production: first, by inventions and machinery and steam power in aid of productiveness of human labor; second, by steam-ships taking the plaee o f sails on all the lines o f ocean commerce, shortening the time o f the voyage and cheapening the cost o f transportation and commercial intercourse; third, by the net-work of rail ways through all the more progressive countries, diminishing the cost of in ternal transportation and intercourse to one-fourth the former cost in both time and m on ey; fourth, in belting both the continents and the seas with the tele graph, by which we have at our breakfast-tables the n,ews of yesterday from the most distant corners o f the earth, formerly taking six months to reach us; fifth, by our improved method o f exchanges, lessening by three-fourths the actual quantity o f m oney—gold and silver—used by commerce, and thereby lessening its cost. These improvements, the result o f advanced civilization and of fertile inven tion, are recognized by all intelligent economists and statesmen as fully ac counting for the cheapened prices o f commodities, while hum an labor advances in its reward, and gold as well as silver depreciates in value. As Mulhall, the English statistician, says: “ It would be monstrous if prices remained the same in spite o f cheapened transport, improved machinery, and all the effects of scien tific progress.” f The farmer will really see, in view o f this recital, how his interests are affected. I f his products are somewhat reduced in value, so are all articles of his consump tion cheapened in still greater ratio. A rapid or unexpected fall or rise in prices of agricultural productions is not a new experience in our country or in other countries in the world. Nothing is more uncertain in price than the perishable articles which form the common food o f mankind. I n my own experience I SH E R 10 have seen the price of wheat fall in Ohio as low as 50 cents and rise to $2 without any apparent appreciation or diminution of the cur rency. Some fifty years ago a very popular and excellent man was a candidate for the Legislature in Ohio and his election was supposed to be assured, but an advertisement was found in a local paper of some twenty or thirty years before that time, in which he, as a miller, offered to pay 30 cents a bushel for wheat in cash. This offer was thought so illiberal that the candidate was easily beaten, although when the facts were known it was shown that he offered to pay the market price, 30 cents, in cash, while all other bidders would only give 30 cents in store pav. These fluctuations depend upon the law of supply and demand, in volving facts too numerous to state, but rarely depending on the vol ume of money in circulation. An increase of currency can have no effect to advance prices unless we cheapen and degrade it by making it less valuable; and if that is the intention now,the direct and honest way is to put fewer grains of gold or silver in our dollar. This was the old way, by clipping the coin, adding base metal. If we want a cheaper dollar we have the clear constitutional right to put in it 15 grains of gold instead of 23, or 300 grains of silver in stead of 412}, but you have no power to say how many bushels of wheat the new dollar shall buy. You can, if you choose, cheapen the dollar under your power to coin money -and thus enable a debtor to pay his debts with fewer grains of silver or gold under the pretext that gold or silver has risen in value, but in this way you would destroy all forms o f credit and make it impossible for nations or individuals to borrow money for a period of time. It is a species of repudiation. The best standard of value is one that measures for the longest period its equivalent in other products. Its relative value may vary from time to time. If it falls, the creditor loses; if it increases, the debtor loses; and these changes are the chances of all trade and commerce and all loaning and borrowing. The duty of the Government is performed when it coins money and provides convenient credit representatives of coin. The purchasing power of money for other commodites depends upon changing conditions over which the Government has no control. Even its power to issue paper money has been denied until recently, but this may be considered as settled by the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in the legal-tender cases. All that Congress ought to do is to provide a sufficient amount of money, either of coin or its equivalent of paper money, to meet the current wants of business. This it has done in the twelve years last passed at a ratio of increaes far in excess of any in our previous history. Surely, if an abundance of good money constantly increasing in vol ume, all equal to gold, is the elixir of life in our trade and commerce, and should bring prosperity to our people and good prices and good markets for our farmers, now would be the good time come; but ex perience has shown that the prices have fallen as our currency increased. Nor can it be said that industries are idle or that the country has not reasonably prospered in general growth and production. Still it is apparent that there is a general feeling in the country that Congress ought to provide for additional circulation, or, at least, supply a substitute for the national-bank notes being rapidly retired. The sole cause o f this retirement is the payment by the United States of its bonds held as security for the notes of national banks. Congress has repeatedly'refused to allow these banks to issue notes to the amount of' the real value of the bonds deposited, or even to their face value, and has steadily shown its opposition to the system of national banks by refusing to pass any measure of relief, however just and meritorious, SHER 11 so that the friends o f the national-bank system feel that its end is near at hand. The 4J per cent, bonds, amounting to $112, 521,250, will mature next year, and the 4 per cent, bonds, amounting to $606,551,000, will mature in 1907 and be paid, leaving no basis for the national-bank system, and there is no disposition on the part of Congress to prescribe any other security for circulating bank notes. We must then legislate in view of the fact that the $60,000,000 of national-bank notes now outstand ing and secured by a deposit of lawful money must soon be paid off, that the circulating notes based upon 4} per cent, bonds will probably be retired within a year, and that the balance of the circulating notes, amounting on April 30 to $128,920,916, will be ietired prior to 1907. This fact alone compels us to provide for some substitute for these cir culating notes. Under the law of February, 1878, the purchase of $2,000,000 worth of silver bullion a month has by coinage produced annually an average of nearly $3,000,000 a month for a period of twelve years, but this amount, in view of tbe retirement of the bank notes, will not increase our currency in proportion to our increasing population. If our pres ent Currency is estimated at $1,400,000,000, and our population is in creasing at the ratio of 3 per cent, per annum, it would require $42,000,000 increased circulation each year to keep pace with the increase o f population; but as the increase of population is accompanied by a still greater ratio of increase of wealth and business, it was thought that an immediate increase of circulation might be obtained by larger purchases of silver bullion to an amount sufficient to make good the re tirement o f bank notes, and keep pace with the growth o f population. Assuming that $54,000,000 a year of additional circulation is needed upon this basis, that amount is provided for in this bill by the issue of Treasury notes in exchange for bullion at the market price. I see no objection to this proposition, but believe that Treasury notes based upon silver bullion purchased in this way w ill be as safe a foundation for paper money as can be conceived. Experience shows that silver coin will not circulate to any consider able amount. Only about one silver dollar to each inhabitant is main tained in circulation with all the efforts made by the Treasury Depart ment, but silver certificates, the representatives o f this coin, pass cur rent without question and are maintained at par in gold by being re ceived by the Government for all purposes and redeemed if called for. I do not fear to give to these notes every sanction and value that the United States can confer. I do not object to their being made a legal tender for all debts, public or private. I believe that if they are to be issued they ought "to be issued as money, with all the sanction and authority that the Government can possibly confer. While I believe the amount to be issued is greater than is necessary, yet in view of the retirement of bank notes I yielded my objections to the increase beyond $4,000,000. As an expedient to provide increased circulation it is far "preferable to free coinage o f silver or any proposition that has been made to provide some other security than United States bonds for bank circulation. I believe it will accomplish the first object proposed, a gradual and steady increase of the current money of the country. But this measure can be greatly aided by a proper treatment of the national banks. These banks have fully met all expectations. They have furnished circulating notes without cost, and without loss to the Government or people o f the United Slates. Tbe total tax collected from the national banks up to July 1, 1889, amounted to $7,855,887.74 on capital, $60,940,067.16 on deposits, and $68,868,180.67 on circulation, making a total of $137,664,135.57, besides full taxes to the SHER 12 States and cities and towns where located. No system of banking has ever been more successful. It is distributed through all parts of the country, is free and open to all without limit. Its strength is in United States bonds deposited as security for the notes, its weakness is in the rapid payment of these bonds and the difficulty of finding a proper substitute. But surely while these bonds are outstanding they ought to be accepted as security for their face vak.e. This alone would check the retirement of bank notes and probably increase their issue. And yet it is those who demand “ more money” that resist so plain a remedy. And there is still another measure of relief against a contraction of the currency. Under the present law national banks, compelled by the payment of their bonds to retire their circulation, must deposit in the Treasury notes equal in amount to the bank notes to be retired. The United States then assumes the payment of the bank notes when presented, but, as the law u j w stands, must retain the United States notes held in the Treasury for that purpose. This is a direct and im mediate contraction o f the currency. To avoid this I propose that these United States notes shall be covered into the Treasury, but be paid out on the public debt or for other purposes, and thus be restored to circu lation. The bank notes will continue in circulation until presented to the Treasury for redemption. They will become in legal effect United States notes and will only be presented for payment when unfit for use. The same process will apply to the remaining bank circulation when and as it is surrendered by the banks. These two measures will be effective to stop the contraction of the currency. This would delay and postpone the further retirement of bank currency until 1907, when the policy of basing Treasury notes upon gold and silver bullion will be proven to be either a success or a iailure. I f Senators really desire to secure more money, good money, based upon gold and silver coin and bullion, they can secure it without the hazard of the dangerous experiment o f the free coinage of silver and of detaching the United States from the standards of value recog nized by the principal commercial, civilized, and Christian nations of the world. I have thus stated my view of the best mode to provide for a gradual increase o f money for circulation and to provide a substitute for na tional-bank notes retired when and as the bonds of the U nited States are retired. And now, Mr. President, I come to the second object of desire, to in crease the market value o f silver not only in the United States but in the world, in the belief that this is essential to the success of any meas ure proposed, and in the hope that our efforts will advance silver to its legal ratio with gold and induce the great commercial nations to join with us in maintaining the legal parity of the two metals, or in agreeing with us in a new ratio of their relative value. To decide how this can be done we must know the precise legal status of silver, how it was affected by the acts of 1834 and 1853 and the coinage act of 1873. After the suspension of the coinage of the silver dollar in 1805 fractional silver coins and also gold coins were issued from the mints; but as gold, by being undervalued, was drawn from our country, fractional silver and foreign coin were the only coin in circulation. One ounce of gold was worth more than 15 ounces of silver, and therefore gold went to countries where it would buy 15J ounces of silver. To avoid this, and to invite gold to our country, the acts of 1834 and 1837 changed the ratio so that 1 ounce of gold was rated at 16 ounces of silver. This was a mistake in the opposite di rection, for 16 ounces of silver were worth more in Europe than 1 ounce SH ER 13 o f gold, and silver disappeared from the United States and gold be came our only coin. To meet this difficulty and to secure the use of both metals, Con gress, by the act of 1853, following the example of England, provided for a coinage of fractional silver containing less grains o f silver and a legal tender for only $5, and thus silver and gold—gold as the stand ard and silver as subsidiary—was the coin of our country. The silver dollar had disappeared long years before. None were to be found ex cept as curiosities. Only $8,045,838 had been coined from 1793 up to 1873, or less than three months’ coinage under the present law. Un der these conditions we entered upon the civil war, when gold and sil ver alike disappeared from our currency. Paper money alone, from the 1 cent stamp to the $5,000 United States note, was then our do mestic currency. We exacted gold for duties on imported goods to en able us to maintain the credit of our bonds. It did not circulate, but was a commodity at a premium for seventeen years until resumption. We heard nothing in Congress of coinage until the abortive effort to devise an international coin as a medium of exchanges between na tions, a gold coin that would be the exact equivalent of £1, or $5, or 25 francs. This was at the Paris conference in 1867, and my letter in support ot it was quoted in this debate. I stand by that letter, every word o f it. At that time it expressed the almost universal desire of our people, it was approved by the Paris conference, and would have been adopted by the leading commercial nations but for the refusal of Great Britain to make the slight change requisite in her pound sterling. It is now the hope and expectation of the leading scientists of the world and will be the first step of the first successful international monetary confer ence—an international coin which will contain so many grains of gold and be the exact equivalent of 25 francs, $5, £1, so that with this in ternational coin a man may travel everywhere. That was only de feated by the narrow idea of the British Government, who refused to change their pound sterling in intrinsic value from 484 to 479 and a fraction, and they declined to do it. It did not deal with or affect the silver question at all. The next we heard of coins and coinage was in a report from the Secretary of the Treasury on the 25th of April, 1870, transmitting the bill now known as the coinage a ct of February 12, 1873, which is here before me. This bill was, on its face, a revision of all the laws relat ing to the Mint and coinage of the United States. It stated what coins o f gold and silver and what minor coins shoul d be coined, and of what metal composed. It dropped from the coins of the United States the silver dollar of 412J grains. And now we are told that this coin was surreptitiously dropped, that*a conspiracy existed to deprive the coun try of one-half of its money with a view to increase the value of the remainder. I mean now to place upon the record proofs so absolutely conclusive that this is a false cr j , that if any man herea fter repeats it in the Sen ate and the House the evidence of the falseh ood will stare him in the face. What was the silver dollar that was said to be demonetized surrep titiously by this act? To some men it is a kind of fetich, made an ob ject of superstitious worship which it is sacrilegious to disturb. It was a coin authorized by the act of April 2, 1792, containing 416 grains of standard silver, afterwards reduced to 412 J or 371^ grains of pure silver. It was based upon the ratio of 15 to 1, admitted from the be ginning to be incorrect. There were coined of these dollars prior to 1805, 1,439,617, or about one-half of one month’s coinage of the silver SHKB 14 dollar now. President Jefferson then suspended their coinage. Mr. Campbell P. White, in an appendix to his famous report, upon which the act of 1834 was founded, transmits a letter from Samuel Moore, Director o f the Mint at Philadelphia, under date of May 25. 1832, in which he says: The President, in 1805, interposed more efficiently by directing that the coin age o f dollars should be suspended at the M int; this remedy met the particular exigence. The Chinese, through prejudice, undervalued the dollar; the lower denominations they refused. Mr. J. K. Upton, in his book, Money in Politics, says: The silver was now (1805) the unquestioned unit o f account, and in this coin all contracts calling for dollars could be satisfied. Mr. Jefferson, who was then President, had favorably indorsed the ratio o f 1 to 15 proposed by Mr. Hamil ton, and adopted in the coinage act o f 1792. He believed that both metals could and would circulate side by side under the relations fixed by that act. He desired that gold should circulate as well as silver, and, to prevent the ex pulsion o f gold, he peremptorily ordered the Mint to discontinue the coinage of the silver dollar, and Congress and the country seemed to have approved his action, although taken without authority, if not in direct violation, o f law. To the effect o f this executive interference is probably due the fact that from 1806 to 1836 no silver dollars were coined. So this dollar so anxiously sought for was demonetized by Mr. Jef ferson, who was familiar with the history of its coinage, and that con tinued practically until our civil war, as I shall presently show. Not one dollar of this coin was issued from its suspension by Mr. Jefferson until after the passage of the act of 1834, and only $1,300 prior to 1840. From that time until the approach of the civil war the issue was com paratively insignificant, varying yearly from $1,100 to $184,000, the highest amount in any one year. Yet during this period, from 1805 to 1860, over $100,000,000 of fractional silver coins were issued and in cir culation, all of which was demonetized in the general sense from 1834, being a legal tender for only $5. The silver dollar had fallen into des uetude. As the war approached, and until 1873, about 5,000,000 silver dollars were coined, solely for exportation to China and Japan, but none of them entered into circulation. Many of us never, prior to 1878, saw a silver dollar. It was an image of the past, lost to sight and memory, conceived by Hamilton, suspended by Jefferson, and ig nored by two generations except as a convenience for the exportation of silver bullion. Mr. JONES, of Nevada. Mr. President-----The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. H arris in the chair). Does the Senator from Ohio yield to the Senator from Nevada? Mr. JONES, of Nevada. Allow me to say one word. Mr. SHERMAN. Certainly. Mr. JONES, of Nevada. I have not known that those who advo cated the recoinage of silver insist that a particular species of coin shall* be coined at the mint. I ask the Senator how many gold dollars have been coined? Mr. SHERMAN. I have given the amount of gold. Mr. JONES, of Nevada. But I ask him to state the amount of gold dollars, not the amount of ten-dollar pieces. I want to say right here, that up to and including 1846 there was more full legal-tender silver money coined than gold, and that it was not the silver dollar that the silver men were insisting upon coining, but silver money with full legaltender functions, whether in the form of half-dollars or quarter-dollars, or any other kind of silver coin; that it was half-dollars, the more con venient coin, that were coined and not the dollar piece. It is of no con sequence whether it was a dollar piece or a half-dollar piece that was coined. SH E R 15 Mr. SHERMAN. I will come to that in a moment. The half-dol lar was never coined except as a subsidary coin and it was only a legal tender for $5. The half-dollar since 1853 has only been a legal ten der for $5. Mr. JONES, of Nevada. I am speaking of the fact that from the foundation of the Government up to and including 1846 more legaltender silver money was coined than gold in this country. Mr. MITCHELL. Will the Senator allow me just one moment? Mr. SHE KMAN. I will say as I said to the Senator from Colorado, that I do not like to refuse and I do not like to consent. Mr. MITCHELL. I only want to occupy one moment. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Does the Senator from Ohio yield ? Mr. SHERMAN. I will hear the Senator from Oregon. Mr. MITCHELL. I think a false impression has been given gener ally as to the action of Thomas Jefferson, referred to by the Senator from Ohio. There was not a general suspension of silver coinage, only the silver dollar, not the suspension of silver entirely. The Senator surely does not mean to convey the impression that Jefferson’s action related to anything more than the suspension of the coinage of the silver dol lar, not to the half dollars or any other silver? Mr. SHERMAN. The dollar I am talking about altogether. Mr. MITCHELL. And the other coins were all legal tender? Mr. SHERMAN. I am talking about the dollar of the fathers. I will repeat the sentence that was broken by the interruption of my friend from Nevada. This policy was an image of the past, lost to sight and memory, conceived by Hamilton, suspended by Jefferson, and ignored by two generations except as a convenience for the ex portation of silver bullion. No wonder that the Senator from Nevada did not know that the sil ver dollar was demonetized. The wonder is that he knew of its ex istence. The revisers of the United States statutes were oblivious to it, for, while the act of 1873 dropped it from coinage, and forbade its issue from the mints, that act did not take from the silver dollars, if in existence, their legal-tender quality. While the whole mass of frac tional silver coins issued under the act of 1853 had been for nineteen years a legal tender only for $5, the silver dollar was among the people an unknown coin. But it is not the legal qualities of the silver dollar I have to deal with, but it is the imputation that it was dropped from our coinage surrepti tiously, done by stealth, unlawfully—this is the charge that I repel. I was chairman of the Committee on Finance when the act of 1873 was considered and passed. My associates in 1871 were Senators J u s t in S. M o r r i l l , George H. Williams, Alexander G. Cattell, Willard Warner, Reuben E. Fenton, and Thomas F. Bayard. The Committee on Coin age of the House, having charge of the bill, consisted of Messrs. William D. Kelley, Samuel Hooper, John Hill, Noah Davis, Peter W. Strader, and John A. Griswold. What motive could we have for such a cow ardly, disgraceful proceeding? On the 25th of April 1870, when the bill was sent to us by the Secretary of the Treasury, the silver dollar was worth $1.0312 in gold in the markets of the world. This was be fore Germany had sold her silver and adopted the gold standard, be fore the slightest sign of the depreciation of silver. Could we so far foresee the future? But I will not leave this matter to argument or inference. The bill on its face shows that it was a bill revising all the laws relating to mints and coinage. In the bill sent to us on the 25th of April, 1870, the sil ver dollar was omitted and its further issue prohibited. Here is a copy of the bill sent to us with the report. [Exhibiting.] I will read the 8H EH 1C fifteenth section. The fourteenth section provides the weight of the double eagle, etc., giying the weight of the gold coins. The fifteenth section was as follows: Se!C. 15. A nd be it further enacted, That of the silver coins, the weight of the half-dollar, or piece o f 50 cents, shall be 192 grains, and that o f the quarter-dollar and dime shall be, respectively,* one-half and one-fifth o f the weight o f said halfdollar; that the silver coin issued in conformity with the above section shall be a legal tender in any one payment o f debts for all sums less than $1. That is, “ for all sums less than $1.” following it: Then here is section 18, just Sec. 18. A nd be it further enacted, That no coins, either o f gold, silver, or minor coinage, shall hereafter be issued from the mint other than those of the denomi nations, standards, and weights herein set forth. Not only was the silver dollar omitted, but there was an express provision that no other coin except those mentioned should be issued from the mint. So not only were the names of the coins designated, their weight and measure fixed, but all others were prohibited by the law of 1873 and on the face of the bill. That bill was sent to us here at the time when the silver dollar was demonetized. With the letter of the Secretary of the 25th ot April, 1870, Mr. Knox, under a conspicuous large-typed heading— “ s i l v e r d o l l a r ; it s d i s c o n t i n u a n c e s a s t a n d a r d ” — says: The coinage of the silver-dollar piece, the history of which is here given, is discontinued in the proposed bill. It is by law the dollar unit, and, assuming the value of gold to be fifteen and one-half times that of silver, being about the mean ratio for the past six years, is worth in gold a premium of about 3 per cent, (its value being $1.0312), and intrinsically more than 7 per cent, premium in our other silver coins, its value thus being $1.0742. “ The present laws consequently authorize both a gold-dollar unit and a silver-dollar unit, differing from each other in intrinsic value. The present gold-dollar piece is made the dollar unit in the proposed bill, and the silver-dollar piece is discontinued.” What can be clearer than that ? That message was sent to us. Mr. DAWES. Did that accompany the bill? Mr. SHERMAN. Certainly. Here is the document. ‘ ‘ If, however, such a coin is authorized it should be issued only as a commercial dollar, not as a standard unit of account, and of the exact value of a Mexican dollar, which is the favorite for circulation in China and Japan and other oriental countries.” This bill was not acted upon in the Senate until the next session of Congress. In the mean time a copy of it was sent to all the experts in the United States. The bill sent to them included among the silver coins a dollar of 384 grains instead of the old dollar of 412^ grains, thus not only dropping out the old dollar, but substituting a token dollar not a legal tender. The replies were sent to the House of Rep resentatives in obedience to a resolution of the House on the 25th of June, 1870. I have, then, here before me a voluminous report of Mr. Boutwell, the Secretary of the Treasury, of 100 printed pages. It contains a full statement of the objects of the bill, the necessity for the proposed re vision, with reports, among others, from Robert Patterson, F. Peale, H. R. Linderman, James Ross Snowden, G. F. Dunning, and E. B. Elliot, all of them known as scientific experts and the principal officers of the mints and assay offices. Each of them discussed the provisions of the bill. The necessity for the revision of the coinage law was admitted on all hands. It had been recommended by Secretary Chase and his assist ant, Mr. Harrington, by Secretary MeCulloch and his assistant, Mr. SHEB 17 C h a n d l e r , now a member of tbe Senate. There had been no codifi cation of the mint laws for thirty-five years. The different acts of Con gress in reference to the service were scattered through all the various volumes of the statutes. The English Government had recently re vised its mint laws, introducing important reforms. The “ coinage act of 1873’ ’ was framed with a like purpose. The operations of the Mint wei*e not suspended during the war. The amount of coinage during the suspension of specie payments, 1861-1879, was 1735,320,317, while the total coinage from 1792, the year of the establishment of the Mint, to 1861, a period of seventy years, was but $599,428,229. There was 50 per cent, more coined in the eighteen years after 1861 than during the whole period of the Gov ernment before 1861. The business of the Mint was rapidly increasing and the wisdom of creating a bureau of the mint in the Treasury De partment was apparent to every one. The section of the bill which discontinues the coinage of the old sil ver dollar was discussed by all the experts. Hon. James Pollock, formerly governor of Pennsylvania, then Director of the Mint, favored the reduction of the weight of the silver dollar from 412J grains to 384 grains, as he had previously recommended in bis annual report of 1861. Robert Patterson was in favor of the abolishment of the silver dollar, half-dime, and three-cent piece. He said, 4‘ Gold becomes the standard of which the gold dollar is the unit. Silver is subsidiary, embracing coins from the dime to .half-dollar.” The heading of this paragraph was printed in capital letters, thus: “ s i l v e r d o l l a r , h a l f -d i m e , AND THREE-CENT PIECE DISCONTINUED, AND COINS LESS THAN DIME OF COPPER, NICKEL, LEGAL TENDER— ONE-CENT PIECE OF ONE GRAM IN WEIGHT.’ ’ The same report contains a letter dated June 10, 1870, from E.XB. Elliot, late Actuary of the Treasury Department (page 70), well known to many Senators, now dead, which gives a brief history of the silver dollar, headed as follows, in capital letters: T H E ST A N D A R D S IL V E R D O L L A R — ITS D ISCO N TIN U AN CE AS A ST A N D A R D . The bill proposes the discontinuance o f the silver dollar, and the report which accompanies the bill suggests the substitution for the existing standard silver dollar of a trade coin o f intrinsic value equivalent to the M exican silver piastre or dollar. Franklin Peale, formerly melter and refiner of the mint at Philadel phia, says: To designate what the weight o f silver coinage should be at this time is a dif ficult problem, and should be carefully considered by com petent financiers, bullionists, and Mint officers before any law is enacted. The heading of this paragraph was in capital letters, as follows: W E I G H T OP S IL V E R COIN SH O U LD B E C A R E F U L L Y CO N SID ER ED . Mr. Peale recommended the discontinuance of the coinage of the onedollar and three-dollar gold pieces and gave his reasons therefor. Dr. H. R. Linderman, formerly Director of the Mint, discussed the subject in a paragraph which was headed in capitals as follows: “ D is c o n t in u a n c e OF SILVER DOLLAR.” Hon James Ross Snowden discussed the same subject in a paragraph which was headed in capitals as follows: “ T h e p r e s e n t s i l v e r d o l lar SHOULD NOT BE DISCONTINUED.” Hon. George F. Dunning, late superintendent of the assay office in New York, the officers of the United States mint at San Francisco, and others discussed this feature of the bill. It was well said in the report of the Comptroller of the Currency in 1876: If the question o f the double standard did aot become prom inent in the dis cussion o f the bill it was for the reason that usage had establish ed the gold dolsher --------2 18 lar as the unit, the silver dollar, on account o f its greater relative value, hav ing, with the Mexican dollar and pistareen, disappeared from the circulation of the country. The coinage act o f 1873 simply registered in the form o f a statute what had been really the unwritten law of the laud for forty years. We had this one-hundred-page document sent by Secretary Boutwell, with returns from all the officers of the Mint, and the experts throughout the country, probably thirty or forty of them. We had at that time, when we considered the bill, the previous letter of our Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, who had charge of the Mint, rec ommending the passage of the bill, with a copy of the bill, and copies of the bill were sent broadcast, omitting entirely the silver dollar and calling special attention to that omission in every possible way. Now, Mr. President, with all this copious information in both Houses this coinage bill was reported to the Senate by the Committee on Fi nance on the 19th of December, 1870. On the 9th and 10th days of January, 1871, it was debated for two full days mainly upon the coin age charge of three-tenths of one per cent., by Senators Cole, Williams, Corbett, Stew art , and Casserly against the charge, and M orrill and Sherman for it. The bill was read in full, and a number of amend ments made, but the coinage provision was defeated and the charge for coinage was repealed. The bill passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 14 nays, January 10, 1871. Among the nays I find the names of Morrill and S h erm an , no doubt because against their advice all coinage charges were repealed. Among the yeas I find the names of Casserly, Cole, Corbett, Nye, St ew art , and Williams, 'every Senator from the Pacific coast. It was that bill that omitted and excluded the silver dollar from our coinage, and, in accordance with the act o f 1853, continued all silver coinage as sub sidiary and a legal tender for $5 only. No bill was ever more broadly proclaimed or publicly discussed in all its details than this, and yet my venerable friend [Mr. M orrill ] and myself, who voted against the bill, have been singled out and named as dupes or conspirators, while gentlemen who voted for the bill were victims of a plot, ignorant of its provisions, and generally taken in ! It is better far to stand manfully for what we did honestly, even if we were mistaken, which to this hour I do not think we were. Is it possible that any man who participated in this debate could have been ignorant that the old silver dollar of 1792 was dropped from our coinage by this bill? Is it not more likely that he was indifferent to it or had forgotten it ? I knew and recall the dropping out of the silver dollar, and neither plead ignorance nor negligence, but I had not the omniscient power to see into the future, when the dollar suspended by Jefferson, demonetized by Jackson and Benton, superseded by subsidiary half-dollars by Pierce and Hunter, turned into a trade-dollar in 1873, would become the idol of the Demo cratic party in 1890, as the best expedient for cheap money, the most plausible pretext for confiscating a portion of public and private debts. This bill was sent to the House, referred to the Committee on Coin age, and reported favorably, but no action was taken upon it during that session. Early in the called session following Mr. Kelley introduced an original bill substantially similar to the bill of the preceding Con gress, but with this important modification of section 16. The House bill recommended a subsidiary dollar of 384 grains with limited legal tender in place of the old dollar of 412J grains. So the other House had inserted in the bill when it was reintroduced by Mr. Kelley this subsidiary coin of 385 grains, containing 26^ fewer grains than the old silver dollar, and made subsidiary coin like the former subsidiary coin of half-dollars and quarter dollars. The bill finally became a law on the 12th of February, 1873, nearly three years after it was introduced into Congress. It was reprinted SH E R 19 thirteen times and extra copies were printed for circulation. It was conned over, amended, and debated almost as copiously as the bill now pending, and no man in either House proposed to retain the old silver dollar. It was not mentioned, it was not thought of. It was an after device. The fact that it was omitted from our coins was referred to in debate in both Houses. Mr. Hooper, in the House of Representa tives, said: Section 16 re-enacts the provisions o f existing laws defining the silver coins and their weights respectively, except in relation to the silver dollar, which is reduced in weight from 412% to 381 grains, thus making it a subsidiary coin in harmony with the silver coins o f less denominations, to secure its concurrent circulation with them. The silver dollar o f 412%grains, by reason of its bullion or intrinsic value being greater than ita nominal value, long since ceased to be a coin o f circulation, and is melted by manufacturers o f silverware. It does not circulate now in icommercial transactions with any country, and the conven ience o f those manufacturers in this respect can better be met by supplying small, stamped bars o f the same standard, avoiding the useless expense o f coin ing the dollar for that purpose. Here it was pointed out by Mr. Hooper, a very distinguished finan cier, as we know, that it was not only proposed to drop the old dollar, but to substitute a dollar containing 26J grains less than the old dol lar, and that was adopted by the House. Mr. Stoughton and Mr. Rot ter, both leading members, supported the proposition. Mr. Kelley, whose honorable life we have recently commended, ad vocated the single standard of gold: Mr. K e l l e y . I wish to ask the gentleman who has just spoken [Mr. Potter] if he knows of any Government in the world which makes its subsidiary coinage o f full value ? The silver coin o f England is 10 per cent, below the value o f gold coin. And acting undertime advice of the experts o f this country and o f England and France, Japan has made her silver coinage within the last year 12 per cent, below the value o f gold coin, and for this reason: It is impossible to retain the double standard. The values o f gold and silver continually fluctuate. Y ou can not determine this year what will be the relative values of gold and silver next year. They were 15 to 1 a short time a g o ; they are 16 to 1 now. Hence, all experience has shown that you must have one standard coin, which shall be a legal tender for all others, and then you may promote your domestic convenience by having a subsidiary coinage o f silver, which shall circulate in all parts o f your country as legal tender for a limited amount and be redeem able at its face value by your Government. So it appears that these honorable gentleman not only knew what they were about, but gave their reasons for adopting the 384-grain dol lar instead of the old dollar of 412J grains, and the House acted with full knowledge in adopting the French dollar and made it a subsidiary coin or a legal tender for but $5. When the House bill came to the Senate it contained the silver dollar of 384 grains, and also fractional coins of the same relative value, precisely in accordance with the coins of 1853, except that the 384-grain dollar, made a legal tender for only $5, was substituted for the old silver dollar of 412\ grains, which was a full legal tender. This, it appears, was explained by me on the 17th of January, 1873, in the following words: Mr. S herman . The bill proposes a silver coinage exactly the same as the French, and what are called the associated nations of Europe, who have adopted the international standard of silver coinage; that is, the dollar provided for by this bill is the precise equivalent of the five-franc piece. Now, unless some Senator then a member of this body did not know the difference between a five-franc piece and a dollar, he certainly must not have been listening to me or he would have been clearly informed: It contains the same number o f grams of silver; and we have adopted the international gram instead of the grain for the standard of our silver coinage. The “ trade dollar” has been adopted mainly for the benefit o f the people of* California and others engaged in trade with China. I presented a petition here from the Legislature of California asking us to give them a dollar more valuable than the Mexican coin, in order that they might have a convenient mode of transporting their silver SHBB 20 bullion, then not used at all among the people of the United States as currency. That is the only coin measured by the grain instead of by the gram. trinsic value of each is to be stamped upon the coin. The in Afterwards Mr. Casserly said that a dollar somewhat more valuable than the Mexican dollar would be a convenient coin for the exporta tion of silver in the Chinese trade; and he produced a memorial from the Legislature of California asking Congress to provide for such a coin, and we did provide for the trade-dollar of 420 grains, to be coined at any mint at the expense of the owner of the bullion. Other amend ments were made and the bill passed. A conference was ordered on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses and was held. The House conferees agreed to the amendment in respect to the trade-dollar and provided “ that any owner of silver bullion may deposit the same at any mint to be formed into bars or into dollars of the weight of 420 grains troy, designated in this act as trade-dollars.” This dollar took the place of the 384-grain dollar. The report was signed by the conferees of both Houses, J o h n S h e r m a n , John Scott, T. F. Bayard, managers on the part of the Senate, and S. Hooper and W. L. Stoughton, managers on the part of the House. The report was read in the Senate February 6, and in the House February 7, 1873, and agreed to. I do not see how a member of either House, in the face of the recom mendation of the Treasury Department and of the debate in both Houses on this very question, can repeat the imputation against the living and the dead of secretly and surreptitiously demonetizing the silver dollar without confessing to a grave neglect of public duty or a want of com mon intelligence. When this matter was discussed here in March, 1888, by the lamented Senator from Kentucky, Mr. Beck, he repeated the stale charge that the old silver dollar was surreptitiously dropped from our coinage, and I promptly replied in a speech I hold in my hand. I produced the original bills from the files of the Senate. I produced the memorial of the Legislature of California and conclusively an swered this charge, not only for myself but for every member of the Sen ate and House of Representatives that passed that bill, and, I am glad to say, to the entire satisfaction of the then Senator from Kentucky. And now, sir, I intend to add the testimony of one more witness, that of Hon. Abram S. Hewitt of New York, who gave to this subject the most careful study. He said in his speech in the House of Represent atives on the 5th of August, 1876, as follows: The gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Bland] on the 3d instant stated that the coinage act o f 1873 “ was passed surreptitiously and without discussion, and was one o f the grossest measures o f injustice ever inflicted upon any people.” The honorable Senator from Nevada [Mr. Jones], and the honorable gentleman from Indiana [Mr, Holman], have made similar statements, and these statements have been reiterated by the press o f the country and repeated again to-day by the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Bland], and the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Fort]. In answer to these charges I propose, at the risk of being tedious but in order to refute them once for all, to give, in a note at the foot o f my re marks, the history o f the coinage act o f 1S73, as shown by the records of the Treasury Department and o f Congress. * * * * * * * I have felt it necessary to make this weary statement in order to prove that the legislation o f 1873 was not surreptitiously enacted, traveling over ground that has been occupied in part by other members who have addressed the House, and in part by the daily press, because there is nothing so unpalatable to the American people as “ tricks” in legislation, o f which the Committee on Mines and Mining will be fully conscious when it comes to be generally understood how far they have exceeded the legitimate line o f their duty in bringing forward this bill, which could never have been reported from the Committee on Bank ing and Currency, to which it properly belonged. I will ask the Reporter to insert at the end of my remarks the his torical statement of the coinage act of 1873, prepared by this gentleman, SH E R 21 and I will not weary the Senate by reading it. It contains a most complete analysis and statement of every stage of the passage of the bill. Now, sir, I shall leave this question, upon which perhaps I show a little more feeling than I ought. It is pretty hard to chase down a lie so often repeated, but I thought it necessary to do it, and set forth the matter here, not only for myself but also for all others engaged in that legislation. If, after this second vindication of the members of the Forty-second Congress, this baseless charge is repeated I shall content myself with denouncing it as a falsehood. And now, sir, I recur to mytsecond proposition, how to increase, if possible, the market value of silver to its legal ratio to gold, that of 16 to 1. In 1878 the United States commenced the experiment under the act of February 28, 1878, by remonetizing the silver dollar ot 412^ grains of standard silver, and by purchasing silver bullion at the market price to the amount of $2,01)0,000 worth a month and coining it into silver dollars. We know the result of that experiment. Silver bullion steadily declined in value. This table gives the average price of silver in London each fiscal year, 1873-1889, and the value of an ounce of fine silver at par of exchange, with decline expressed in per centages, each year since 1873: Year. 1873 ............................................................................... 1874 .............................................................................. 1875 .............................................................................. 1877 .............................................................................. 1878 .............................................................................. 1879 ........................................................................... 1880............................................................................... 1881............................................................................. 1882 .............................................................................. 1883.............................................................................. 1884 .............................................................................. 1885 ............................................................................... 1886............................................................................. 1887 ............................................................................. 1888 .............................................................................. 1889 ............................................................................... of Decline Price in Value from a fine London. ounce. 1873. Penee. Dollars. 59.2500 58. 3125 56. 8750 52.7500 54.8125 54. 3107 50. 8125 52.4375 51.9375 51.8125 51.0230 50.7910 49.8430 47.0380 44.8430 43.6750 42.4990 1.29883 1.27827 1.24676 1.15634 1.20156 1.19050 1.11387 1.14954 1.13852 1.13623 1.11826 1.11339 1.09262 1. 03112 .98301 .95741 .93163 Per cent. 1.6 4. 11. 7.5 8.3 14.2 11.5 12.3 12.5 13.9 14.3 15.9 20.6 24.3 26.3 28.3 The silver dollar, though a full legal tender, with every effort made by successive Secretaries of the Treasury, could not be kept in circu lation to an amount exceeding $60, COO, 000. When pressed into circu lation it steadily returned to the Treasury, and on June 1 the amount in circulation was $56,348,174, and the amount in the Treasury was $309,988,092. But the certificates based upon the dollars were issued and readily circulated as money, and now form nearly one-third of all the paper circulation in the country, and are received and paid out on a parity with United States notes and gold coin. This experiment clearly establishes two things. One is that silver dollars can not be made to circulate as money in excess of a very moderate amount for change or in small transactions. The other is that the coinage of silver dollars does not tend to advance the price of silver in the markets ot the world. But it is said that the reason of this failure is that executive offi cers neglected or refused to exercise the discretionary powers given them to buy and coin bullion to the extent of $4,000?000 per month. 22 There is no ground for this contention. If the coinage of $2,000,000 worth of silver did not check the fall of silver, but steadily accelerated its fall, what would have been the natural effect of the coinage of $4,000,000? The very presence of $290,000,000 of silver coin known to be in our Treasury vaults that can at will be dumped upon the mar kets of the world is the great bearish fact, the menace that tends to de preciate the price of silver. If this great sum had been scattered among the hordes of Asia, where it is largely used as ornaments, and where it is the only standard of value, it would be mingled in the vast unknown mass of three thousand millions of silver estimated as exist ing in the world. But we have made this impossible. We have been careful to buy silver bullion in the market at about $1 for an ounce of 480 grains, and have coined 371 grains of this silver and called it a dollar. We have given to this dollar, when circulated at home, certain qualities which make it current here as a dollar, but it is not current anywhere else in the world. All other nations can buy silver bullion as cheap as the United States, and coin it for less cost. This bullion is an ample se curity for its cost, and if represented by notes not greater in amount than the cost of the bullion they can easily be kept in circulation, but the coin can not be. Its forced circulation would depreciate it in every State in the Union, especially in California and Nevada, where a large proportion of contracts are payable in gold. As coin in the vaults of the Treasury it is in lar more danger from thieves; it is more expensive to handle and 1o guard than bullion, ton for ton. It is easily counterfeited or duplicated. It is a vast hoard always in sight, known to all men, increasing yearly. Suppose instead of $290,000,000 it was $580,000,000, would this tend to increase its value ? Our silver in the form of coin does not and can not circulate in any country but our own. It is of less value in any foreign country than bullion, for to be coined there it must be converted into bullion, It is the opinion of many wise men that if the United States had only coined as much silver as could be circulated at home, leaving the sur plus to find its natural market as bullion, the price of it would not have receded to the rate at which it has been-sold; but, be this as it may, its continued coinage when not needed as money is not only a useless expense, but tends to lower the price of bullion. What then can we do to arrest the fall of silver and to advaijce its market value ? I know of but two expedients. One is to purchase bullion in large quantities as the basis and security of Treasury notes, as proposed by this bill. The other is to adopt the single standard of silver, and take the chances for its rise or fall in the markets of the world. I have already stated the probable results of the hoarding of bullion. By purchasing in the open market our domestic production of silver and hoarding it in the Treasury we withdraw so much from the supply of the world, and thus maintain or increase the price of the remaining silver production of the world. It is not idle in our vaults, but is represented by certificates in active circulation. Sixteen ounces of silver bullion may not be worth 1 ounce of gold, still $1 worth of silver bullion is worth $1 worth of gold. What will be the effect of the free coinage of silver? It is said that it will at once advance silver to par with gold at the ratio of 16 to 1. I deny it. The attempt will bring us to the single standard of the cheaper metal. When we advertise that we will buy all the silver of the world at that ratio and pay in Treasury notes, our notes will have the precise value of 371J grains of pure silver, but the silver will have no higher value in the markets of the world. If, now, that amount of silver can be purchased at 80 cents, then gold will be worth $1.25 SHER 23 in the new standard. Free coinage means the substitution of a cheaper standard. All labor, property, and commodities will advance in nom inal value, but their purchasing power in other commodities will hot increase. If you make the yard 30 inches long instead of 36 you must purchase more yards for a coat or a dress, but do not lessen the tost of the coat or the dress. You may by free coinage, by a species of con fiscation, reduce the burden of a debt, but you can not change the rela tive value of gold or silver or any object of human desire. The only result is to demonetize gold and to cause it to be hoarded or exported. The cheaper metal fills the channels of circulation and the dearer metal commands a premium. If experience is needed to prove so plain an axiom we have it in our Own history. At the beginning of our National Government we fixed the value of gold and silver as 1 to 15. Gold was undervalued and fled the country to where an ounce of gold was worth 15J ounces of silver. Congress, in 1834, endeavored to rectify this by making the ratio 1 to 16, but by this silver was undervalued. Sixteen ounces of silver were worth more than 1 ounce of gold, and silver disappeared. Congress, in 1853, adopted another expedient to secure the value of both metals as money. By this expedient gold is the standard and silver the subsidiary coin, containing confessedly silver of less value inthe market than the gold coin, but maintained atthe parity of gold coin by the Government. The bill was carried forward in the Senate Chamber by Mr. Hunter, of Virginia, and many o^ the most distinguished men of that day par ticipated in the debate upon it, where it was fully discussed and its passage put upon the ground that it was impossible to make the two metals always equal to each other so that their relative value would not change. Therefore, gold was adopted as the standard, and silver was to be used so far as it could be as a subsidiary coin for currency. In that way both metals have run side by side from that day to this, and under that law more gold and silver coin—fourfold more of both metals—has been coined than under the old system^of up Joe and down Jack, the system of a changeable ratio. This system has been maintained now for thirty-six years, more than an average lifetime. Under it the coinage of silver has enormously in creased. From 1792 to 1853 the entire coinage of silver was $79,241,904.50, including $2,506,890 of standard silver dollars. From 1853 to 1873, when the coinage act was passed, the coinage of silver dollars was $5,538,948, and of fractional silver (subsidiary) was $60,361,032.10. Under the act of 1873 there were issued 35,965,924 trade dollars, and $5,445,264.40 fractional silver. Under the resumption act of 1875, there was coined of fractional silver $48,082,580. Under the act of 1878 there was coined of standard silver dollars $363,626,266, as shown by the following table: Coinage of silver in the United States. Period. * Standard sil ver dollars. 1792-1853.............. 1853-1873.............. Act o f 1873........... Act of 1875........... Act o f 1878........... 3*33,626,266 Total.............. 371,672,104 t B ureau o f SHEE Trade dol lars. $2,50 >,890 5,538,948 Fractional silver. Total. 835,965,924 $76,735,014.50 60,361,032.10 5,445,264.^40 48,082,580.05 $79,241,904.50 65,899, i80.10 41,411,188.40 48,082,580.05 363,636,266.00 35,965,924 190,623,891.05 598,261,919.05 t h e M int, May 28, 1890. E. O. LEECH, Director o f the Mint, 24 It is a remarkable fact that since 1853, when all silver coin was made from bullion bought by the Government, the coinage and use of silver has been much *greater than when the coinage of silver was free. Un der the free-coinage system prior to 1853 we coined in silver $79,241,904.50, and under coinage limited to bullion bought by the Govern ment we coined in silver $519,020,014.55. Under the present system we have also maintained an increasing coinage of gold and have now in the United States among the people or in the vaults of the Treasury $689,275,007 in gold coin or bullion, all of which is either circulating as money or is the basis of paper money inactive circulation. Under the free-coinage system the cheaper metal was the only money of the country—the other fled to foreign countries. A rise or fall ot 3 per cent, would demonetize one or other of the metals. Under the present system the people are indifferent to the fluctuations in the bull ion market and they know they have a fixed standard of value and that the Government, the custodian of their money, will maintain the parity of the purchasing power of their coins whatever may be the market value of the metal contained in them. The gold standard has been the recognized policy of all the great po litical parties that have longest controlled the. Government of the United States. The Federal party in the beginning sought to secure it by ascertaining the precise relative market value of the two metals and coining both as money, but erroneously fixed the ratio at 15 to 1. When the Democratic party came into power, Mr. Jefferson, to secure the circulation of gold, suspended the coinage of the silver dollar, but a faulty ratio stood in his way. General Jackson and Benton and their associates in 1834, with the avowed purpose to restore gold, or ‘ ‘ Ben ton mint drops, ’ ’ as they were called, to circulation, changed the ratio to 16 to 1, but this banished all silver coin. In the administration ot President Pierce in 1853 the present system was adopted, by which gold became the unit of value and the coinage of silver was made sub sidiary, but was always maintained in purchasing power the equal of gold, dollar for dollar. And so when the Republican party came into power, though driven by the stress of war to the almost exclusive use of credit money, yet as soon as possible it resorted to the policy of 1853, of gold as the unit and silver as subsidiary, and coined both metals in greater sums than ever before, and maintained their parity by a limitation of the coinage of the cheaper metal and its prompt redemption by being received at its legal ratio into the Treasury as the equivalent of gold. By this policy it has combined in use within twelve years over $800,000,000 of gold and silver coin, and with ample reserves of their coin in the Treas ury now keeps in active circulation over $900,000,000 of paper money, which is in our own country and in all parts of the world received and paid out as the equivalent of gold or silver coin. The adoption of free coinage now will be a reversal of the established policy of the Government from its beginning. It will limit our coinage to a single metal, for who will deposit gold for coinage into dollars when it is worth more in the markets of the world ? If a fluctuation of 3 per cent, drove gold and silver alternately from our country, how much more would a fluctuation of 20 or 30 per cent.? But it is said by the friends of free coinage that France maintains both silver and gold as money. So it does, precisely as we do. They hold, as estimated by the Director of the Mint, $900,000,000 of gold and $700,000,000 in silver. This money is kept at par with each other by being received into the Bank of France as money and is only paid out when needed, precisely as the United States Treasury receives sil ver and gold and pays out such money as is lawfully demanded. But SHEE 25 there is no free coinage in France or in any country of Europe. France would consider it suicidal to adopt free coinage. In 1865, when 15| ounces of silver were worth more than 1 ounce of gold, and Chevalier and others favored the single standard of silver, the nations forming the Latin Union agreed by treaties to continue for ten years to receive and pay out the coins of the respective Govern ments to an amount limited and defined by the treaties. The object was to prevent gold, as the cheaper metal, from excluding silver. This treaty was extended ten years, and, in the meantime, silver had fallen below the French ratio of 15J to 1. The treaty continued during all the period of the extreme fall of silver, when 1 ounce of gold was worth 22 ounces of silver, and the treaty is no w continued year by year, lia ble at any time to be abandoned at the will of either of the treaty powers. The tendency of public opinion in Europe is to abandon the double standard and rest all obligations upon gold alone. The United States and France, both republics, are now upholding the double standard, not upon the basis of free coinage, but by refus ing to coin silver except in limited amounts, and each maintaining the parity in purchasing power of its coins by receiving them and paying them out as money, or by holding bullion and coin of both metals as security for the redemption in coin of circulating notes. France and the United States have co operated heartily with each other in two international conferences to establish the Iree coinage of silver and gold by the commercial nations of the world upon a common ratio, both admitting that neither or both nations combined can with safety enter upon such an experiment. Shall we try the experiment alone? And we have the good fortune to have two members ol this commission members of this body. As sure as fate, as certain as the waters of the ocean will find their level, silver will be the only standard of value in the United States. We will detach ourselves from the standards and monetary policy of the great civilized and Christian nations of the world, and take our place with China, Japan, India, and South America. The pound4sterling will be worth $6 instead of $4,846; the franc, the thaler, and the, florin, 25 per cent, more than now. Our dollar will be, as in colonial times, worth less than 3 shillings, or about 4 francs. But it is said that those of us who demand the gold standard, or paper money always equal to gold, are the representatives of capital, money-changers, bondholders, Shylocks, who want to grind and oppress the people. This kind of argument I hoped would never find its way into the Senate Chamber. It is the cry of the demagogue, without the slightest foundation. All these classes can take care of themselves. They are the men who make their profits out of the depreciation of money. They can mark up the price of their property to meet chang ing standards. They can protect themselves by gold contracts. In proportion to their wealth they have less money on hand than any other class. They have already protected themselves to a great extent by converting the great body of the securities in which they deal into gold bonds, and they hold the gold of the country, which you can not change in value. They .aie not, as a rule, the creditors of the country. The great creditors are savings-banks, insurance companies, widows and orphans, and provident farmers and business men on a small scale. The great operators are the great borrowers and owe more than is due them. Their credit is their capital and they need not have even money enough to pay their rent. But how will this change affect the great mass of our fellow-citizens who depend upon their daily labor? A dollar to them means so much food, clothing, and rent. If you cheapen the dollar it will buy less of these. You may say they will get more dollars lor their labor, but all SH E R 26 experience shcrws that labor and land are the last to feel the change in monetary standards, and the same resistance will be made to an ad vance of wages on the silver standard as on the gold standard, and when the advance is won it will be found that the purchasing power of the new dollar is less than the old. No principle of political economy is better established than that the producing classes are the first to suffer and the last to gain by monetary changes. I might apply this argument to the farmer, the merchant, the pro fessional man, and to all classes except the speculator or the debtor who wishes to lessen the burden of his obligations; but it is not necessary ? It is sometimes said that all ^his is a false alarm, that our demand for silver will absorb all that will be offered and bring it to par with gold at the old ratio. I have no faith in such a miracle. If they really thought so, many would lose their interest in the question. What they want is a cheaper dollar that would pay debts easier. Others do not want either silver or gold, but want numbers, numerals, the fruit of the printing-press, to be fixed every year by Congress as we do an ap propriation bill. Now, sir, I am willing to do all I can with safety, even to taking great risks to increase the value of silver to £old at the old ratio, and to supply paper substitutes for both for circulation, but there is one immutable, unchangeable, ever-existing condition, that the paper sub stitute must always have the same purchasing power as gold and silver coin, maintained at their legal ratio with each other. I feel a convic tion, as strong as the human mind can have, that the free coinage of silver now by the United States will be a grave mistake and a misfor tune to all classes and conditions of our fellow-citizens. I also have a hope and belief, but far from a certainty, that the measure proposed for the purchase of silver bullion to a limited amount, and the issue of Treasury notes for it, will bring silver and gold to the old ratio, and will lead to an agreement with other commercial nations to maintain the free coinage of both metals. And now, sir, I want to state in conclusion, without any purpose to bind myself to detail, that I will vote for any measure that will, in my judgment, secure a genuine bimetallic standard—one that will not de monetize gold or cause it to be hoarded or exported, but will establish both silver and gold as common standards and maintain them at a fixed ratio, not only in the United States but among all the nations of the world. The principles adopted by the acts of 1853 and 1875 have been sustained by experience and should be adhered to. In pursuance of them I would receive into the Treasury of the United States all the gold and silver produced in our country at their market value, not at a speculative or forced value, but at their value in the markets of the world. And for the convenience of our people I would represent them by Treasury notes to an amount not exceeding their cost. I would confer upon these notes all the use, qualities, and attributes that we can confer within our constitutional power, and support and maintain them as money by coining the silver and gold as needed upon the present legal ratios, and by a pledge of all the revenues of the Government and all the wealth and credit of the United States. And I would proclaim to all our readiness, by international negotiations or treaties, to bring about an agreement among nations for common units of value and of weights and measures for all the productions of the world. This hope of philosophers and statesmen is now nearer realization than ever before. If we could contribute to this result it would tend to promote commerce and intercourse, trade and travel, peace and har mony among nations. It would be in line with the civilization of our age. It is by such measui\ s statesmen may keep pace with the marSHER 27 velous inventions, improvements, and discoveries which have quadru pled the capacity of man for production, made lightning subservient to his will, revealed to him new agencies of power hidden in the earth, and opened up to his enterprise all the dark x>laces of the world. The people of the United States boast that they have done their full share in all this development, that they have grown in population, wealth, and strength, that they are the richest of nations, with untarnished credit, a model and example of self-government without kings or princes or lords. Surely this is no time for a radical change of public policy which seems to have no motive except to reduce the burden of obligations freely taken, a change likely to impair our public credit and produce disorder and confusion in all monetary transactions. Others may see reasons for this change, but I prefer to stand b j the standards of value that come to us with the approval and sanction of every party that has administered the Government since its beginning. APPENDIX. [Extract from speech of Hon. A. S. Hewitt, of New York, in the House of Rep resentatives, August 5, 1876. T On April 25, 1870, the Secretary of the Treasury transmitted the following letter to Hon. J o h n S h e r m a n , chairman of the Finance Committee of the Sen ate: T r e a s u r y D e p a r t m e n t , April 25,1870. S i r : I have the honor to transmit herewith a bill revising the laws relative to the Mint, assay offices, and coinage of the United States, and accompanying re port. The bill has been prepared under the supervision of John Jay Knox, dep uty comptroller of the currency, and its passage is recommended in the form pre sented. It includes, in a condensed form, all the important legislation upon the coinage, not now obsolete, since the first mint was established, in 1792; and the report gives a concise statement of the various amendments proposed to existing laws and the necessity for the change recommended. There has been no revision of the laws pertaining to the Mint and coinage since 1837, and it is believed that the passage of the inclosed bill will conduce greatly tothe efficiency and economy of this important branch of the Government service. I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, GEO. S. BOUTWELL, Secretary of the Treasury. The report and the bill were referred on April 28, 1870, to the Finance Com mittee of the Senate, and subsequently, on May 2,1870, five hundred additional copies were ordered to be printed for the use of the Treasury Department. The report says: “ The method adopted in the preparation of the bill was first to arrange in as concise a form as possible the laws now in existence upon these subjects, with such additional sections and suggestions as seemed valuable. Having accom plished this, the bill, as thus prepared, was printed upon paper with wide mar gin, and in this form transmitted to the different mints and assay offices, to the First Comptroller, the Treasurer, the Solicitor, the First Auditor, and to such other gentlemen as are known to be intelligent upon metallurgical and numismatical subjects, with the request that the printed bill should be returned with such notes and suggestions as experience and education should dictate. In this way the views of more than thirty gentlemen who are conversant with the man ipulation of metals, the manufacture of coinage, the execution of the present laws relative thereto, the method of keeping accounts, and of making returns to the Department, have been obtained with but little expense to the Depart ment and little inconvenience to correspondents. Having>eceived these sug gestions, the present bill has been framed, and iti~? believed to comprise within the compass of eight or ten pages of the Revised Statutes every important pro vision contained in more than sixty different enactments upon the Mint, assay offices, and coinage of the United States, which are the, result of nearly eighty years of legislation upon these subjects.” The amendments proposed by the bill were as follows: PR O PO SE D AM E N D M EN TS. “ The new features of the bill now submitted are chiefly: the establishment of a Mint Bureau at the Treasury Department, which shall also have chaj*ge of the collection of statistics relative to the precious metals; the consolidation of the office of Superintendent with that of the Treasurer, thus abolishing the lat ter office, and disconnecting the Mint entirely from the office of assistant treasSH ER 28 urer; the repeal of the coinage charge, and authorizing the exchange of unparted for refined bars; a reductiondn the amount of wastage, and the tolerance (deviation in weight and fineness) in the manufacture of coin ; requiring the token coinage to be of one material of uniform value, and to be redeemed under proper regulations when issued in excess, and the expense of its manufacture to be paid from specific appropriations, and not from the gain arising in its manufacture, as heretofore; an entire change in the manner of issuing the silver (subsidiary) coinage; discontinuing the coinage of the silver dollar; limiting the amount of silver to be used as alloy, so as to make the gold coinage of uni form color; the destruction of the dies not in use annually; requiring vouchers to pass between the different officers of the Mint in all transfers of bullion or coin; requiring increased bonds from officers of the Mint, and authorizing each officer to nominate his subordinate before appointment; and also making it an offense to increase or diminish the weights used in the Mint.” The report of Mr. Knox called special attention to the discontinuance of the silver dollar as a standard, as may be seen from the following paragraph on page 11: “ s i l v e r d o l l a r — it s d is c o n t in u a n c e a s a s t a n d a r d . “ The coinage of the silver-dollar piece, the history of which is here given, is discontinued in the proposed bill. It is by law the dollar unit, and assuming the value of gold to be fifteen and one-half times that of silver, being about the mean ratio for the past six years, is worth in gold a premium of about 3 per cent, (its value being 103.12) and intrinsically more than 7 per cent, premium in our other silver coins, ifs value thus being 107.42. The present laws consequently au thorize both a gold-dollar unit and a silver-dollar unit, differing from each other in intrinsic value. The present gold-dollar piece is made the dollar unit in the proposed bill, and the silver-dollar piece is discontinued. If, however, such a coin is authorized, it should be issued only as a commercial dollar, not as a standard unit of account, and of the exact value of theMexican dollar, which is the favorite for circulation in China and Japan and other oriental countries.” The appendix to the report contained a copy of the English coinage act of 1870, and four tables giving (1) the existing coinage, including the silver dollar; (2) the proposed coinage in which the silver dollar was omitted; (3) a metric sys tem of coinage suggesting the issue of a subsidiary silver coinage consisting of two half-dollars constituting in weight and fineness an exact equivalent to the French five-franc piece, and a quarter-dollar and dime with proportionate weight and fineness, which proposition was finally adopted; (4) a table giving a comparison of coinage existing and proposed. A note at the foot of this table states that the silver dollar,' half-dime, and three-eent piece are omitted in the proposed bill. Subsequently, on June 25, 1870, the Secretary of the Treasury transmitted to the House of .Representatives a letter of the then Deputy Comp troller of the Currency, together with copies of the correspondence of the Depart ment with the officers of the different mints, assay offices, and other experts in reference to the bill and report previously submitted. The bill in its original form, which was transmitted to the correspondents throughout the country for consideration and comment, contained the follow ing section, as appears from the manuscript copy at the Treasury Department: “ S e c . 15. And be it further enacted, That of the silver coins [the weight of the dollar shall be 384 grains] (now 412i grains) the weight of the half-dollar or piece of 50 cents shall be 192 grains; and that the quarter-dollar and dime [and half dime] shall be, respectively, one-half and one-fifth [and one-tenth] of the weight of said half-dollar. That the silver coin issued in conformity with the above sections shall be a legal tender in any one payment of debts for all sums [not exceeding $5, except duties on imports] less than Si.” if the words inclosed in [brackets] of the section as here given are excluded and the words in italics included, the section will conform precisely to the sec tion which was transmitted to Congress and which passed the Senate on Jan uary 9, 1871. The dollar of 384 grains was proposed in the rough revision of the bill for the purpose of obtaining an expression of opinion in reference to the proposed omission of the dollar piece and the words “ except duties on imports” inserted for the reason that a regulation or usage at the custom-house in New York limits the payment of silver coins to the fractional parts of a dollar, except when the payment to be made is $5 or less. Several gentlemen in their criti cisms upon the rough revision of the bill referred to this section. Hon. James Pollock, the Director of the Mint at Philadelphia, said: “ S e c . 11. The reduction of the weight of the whole dollar is approved, and was recommended in my annual report of 1 8 6 1 .” (Page 10.) Mr. Kobert Patterson, of Philadelphia, sent to Mr, Knox some notes on the bill suggesting amendments. He called attention to one of these in the follow ing words: “ The silver dollar, half-dime, and three-cent piece are dispensed with by this amendment. Gold becomes the standard money, of which the gold dollar is the unit. Silver is subsidiary, embracing coins from the dime to half-dollar; coins less than the dime are of copper-niekel. The legal tender is limited to necessi ties of the case; not more than a dollar for such silver or 15 cents for the nick els.” SH ER 29 Mr. Franklin Peale, formerly melter and refiner and chief coiner of the mint at Philadelphia, recommended the discontinuance of the three and one dollar gold pieces, and supplying the place of the latter with a proper silver coin to be used as change. Dr. H. R. Linderman, the present Director of the Mint, said: “ Section 11 reduces the weight of the silver dollar from 412i to 384 grains. I can see no good reason for the proposed reduction in the weight of this coin. It would be better, in my opinion, to discontinue its issue altogether. The gold dollar is really the legal unit and measure of value. Having a higher value as bullion than its nominal value, the silver dollar long ago ceased to be a coin of circulation; and being of no practical use whatever its issue should be discon tinued.” Mr. James Boss Snowden, formerly Director of the Mint, said: “ I see that it is proposed to demonetize the silver dollar. This I think unadvisable. Silver coins below the dollar are now not money in aproper sense, but only tokens. I do not like the idea of reducing the silver dollar to that level. It is quite true that the silver dollfir, being more valuable than two halfdollars or four quarter-dollars, will not be used as a circulating medium, but only for cabinets and perhaps to supply some occasional or local demand ; yet I think there is no necessity for so conside rable a piece as the dollar to be struck from metal which is only worth 94 cents. When we speak of dollars let it be known that we speak of dollars not demonetized and reduced below their in trinsic value, and thus avoid the introduction of contradictory and loose ideas of the standards of value.” Mr. George F. Dunning, formerly superintendent of the United States assay office in New York, proposed that the law in regard to the silver coinage should be in the following language: “ S e c . 11. And be it further enacted, That the silver coins of the United States shall be a dollar, a half-dollar, a quarter-doll ar, a dime or tenth of a dollar, and a half-dime or twentieth of a dollar; and the standard weight of the silver coins shall be in the proportion of 384 grains to the dollar, and these coins shall be a legal tender in all payments not exceeding $5.” The officers of the San Francisco branch mint m ade the following suggestions: “ Section 11. Would not the proposed change i n the weight of the silver dollar disturb the relative value of all our coinage, affect our commercial conventions, and possibly impair the validity of contracts running through a long period? Might not the dollar be retained as a measure of value, but the coinage of the piece for circulation be discontinued?” Mr. E. B. Elliott, of the Treasury Department, gave a complete history of the silver dollar, and suggested the issue of a commercial dollar of nine-tenths fine ness, and containing of pure silver just 25 grams, in place of the then existing silver dollar of 412£ grains; the proposed silver dollar being almost the exact equivalent of the silver contained in the older Spanish-Mexican pillared dollar, established in 1704 by proclamation of Queen Anne as a legal tender of pay ment and accepted as par of exchange for the British colonies of North America at the rate of fifty-four pence sterling to the dollar, or four and four-ninth dol lars to the pound sterling. On December 19, 1870, the bill was reported from the Finance Committee of the Senate and printed with amendments. On January 9, 1871, in accordance with previous notice, the bill came before the Senate and was discussed during that day and the following day by Senators S h e r m a n , Sumner, Bayard, S t e w a r t of Nevada, Williams, Casserly, M o r r i l l , and others, and passed the Senate on the 10th by a vote of 36 yeas to 14 nays. On January 13,1871, on motion of Hon. William D. Kelley, the Senate bill was ordered to be printed. On February 25,1871, Mr. Kelley, the chairman of the Committee on Coinage, reported the bill back with an amendment in the nature of a substitute, when it was again printed and recommitted. Mr. Kelley again, on March 9,1871, introduced the bill in the Forty-second Congress, when it was ordered to be printed, and referred to the Committee on Coinage, when ap pointed. On January 9,1872, the bill was reported by Mr. Kelley, chairman of the Coin age Committee, with the recommendation that it pass. The bill was read and discussed at length by Messrs. Kelley, Potter. Garfield, Maynard, D a w e s , H o l m a n , and others. Mr. Kelley, in the opening speech, said : “ The Senate took up the bill and acted upon itr during the last Congress and sent it to the House; it was referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, and received as careful attention as I have ever known a committee to bestow on any measure. • * * * # * * “ We proceeded with great deliberation to go oyer the bill not only section by section, but line by line, and word by word; the bill has not received the same elaborate consideration from the Committee on Coinage of this House, but the attention of each member was brought to it at the earliest day of this session; each member procured a copy of the bill and there has been a thorough examnation of the bill again.” —Congressional Globe, volume 100, page 322. Mr. Kelley on the same day also said: “ There are one or two things in this bill I will say to the gentleman from New York, with his permission, which I personally would like to modify; that SHER 30 is to say, I would like to follow the example of England and make a wide differ ence between our silver and gold coinage. * * * “ I would hav$ liked to have made the gold dollar uniform with the French system of weights, taking the gram as a unit.” (Page 323, volume 100.) On January 10,1872, the bill after considerable discussion was again recom mitted, and on Febru&ry 9, 1872, it was again reported from the Coinage Com mittee by Hon. Samuel Hooper, printed and recommitted, and on February, 13,1872, reported back by Mr. Hooper with amendments, printed, and made the special order for March 12, 1872, until disposed of. On April 9,1872, the bill came up in the House for consideration. Mr. Hooper in a carefully prepared speech of ten columns, explained the provisions of each section of the bill. In this speech (page 2306, volume 102 of the Congres sional Globe) he says: “ Section 16 re-enacts the provisions of the existing laws defining the silver coinsand their weights, respectively, except in relation to the silver dollar, which is reduced in weight from 412£ to 384 grains, thus making it a subsidiary coin in harmony with the silver coins of less denomination to secure its concurrent circulation with them. The silver dollar of 412* grains, by reason of its bullion or intrinsic value being greater than its nominal value, long since ceased to be a coin of circulation, and is melted by manufacturers of silverware. It does not circulate now in commercial transactions with any country, and the convenience of these manufacturers in this respect can better be met by supplying small stamped bars of the same standard, avoiding the useless ex pense of coining the dollar for that purpose.” Mr. Stoughton, of the Coinage Committee, also made a speech of seven col umns, in which he says: “ The silver coins provided for are the dollar, 384 grains troy, the half-dollar, quarter-dollar, and dime, of the value and weight of one-half, one-quarter, and one-tenth of the dollar, respectively; and they are made a legal tender for all sums not exceeding $5 at any one payment. The silver dollar, as now issued, is worth for bullion 3£ cents more than the gold dollar and 7i cent? more than two half-dollars; having a greater intrinsic and nominal value, it is certain to be withdrawn from circulation whenever we return to specie payment, and to be used for only manufacture and exportation as bullion.” The latter, in commenting upon the bill, says: “ Mr. Speaker, this is a bill of importance. When it was before the House in the early part of this session I took some objections to it which I am inclined now to think, in view of all the circumstances, were not entirely well founded, but after further reflection I am still convinced that it is a measure which it is hardly worth while for us to adopt at this time. * * * This bill provides for the mak ing of changes in the legal-tender coin of the count ry and for substituting as legaltender coin of only one metal instead a,3 heretofore of two. I think myself this would be a wise provision, and that legal-tender coins, except subsidiary coin, should be of gold alone; but why should we legislate on this now when we are not using either of those metals as a circulating medium? “ The bill provides also for a change in respect of the weight and value of the silver dollar, which I think is a subject which, when we come to require legis lation about it at all, will demand at our hands very serious consideration, and which, as we are not using such ccins for circulation now, seems at this time to be an unnecessary subject about which to legislate.” (Page 2310, volume 102.) Mr. Kelley also said: “ I wish to ask the gentleman who has just spoken [Mr. Potter] if he knows of any government in the world which makes its subsidiary coinage of full value? Thesilver coin of England is 10 per cent, below the value of gold coin, and, acting under the advice of the experts of this country and of England and France, Japan has made her silver coinage within the last year 12 per cent, below the value of gold coin, and for this reason : It is impossible to retain the double standard. The values of gold and silver continually fluctuate. You can not determine this year what will be the relative values of gold and silver next year. They were 15 to 1 a short time ago; they are 16 to 1 now. “ Hence all experience has shown that you must have one standard coin which shall be a legal tender for all others, and then you may promote your domestic convenience by having a subsidiary coinage of silver, which shall cir culate in all parts of your country as legal tender for a limited amount and be re deemable at its face value by your Government. But, sir, I again call the at tention of the House to the fact that the gentlemen who oppose this bill insist upon maintaining a silver dollar worth 3i cents more than the gold dollar and worth 7 cents more than two half dollars, and that so long as those provisions remain you can not keep silveri coin in the country.” On May 27,1872, the bill was again called up by Mr. Hooper for the purpose of offering an amendment in the nature of a substitute, and the bill as amended passed that day—yeas 110, nays 13. Just previous to the passage of the bill Mr. McNeeley, of the Coinage Com mittee, said: “ As a member of the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, having carefully examined every section and line of this bill, and generally understandSHER 31 ing the subject before us, I am satisfied that the bill ought to pass.” (Page 3883, volume 104.) The substitute reported by Mr. Hooper and passed by the House, so far as it refers to silver coinage, was identical with the bill previously reported from the Coinage Committee by him. It was also identical with the bill introduced by Mr. Kelley, with the single exception of the provision authorizing the coin age of a silver dollar weighing 384 grains. The bill of Mr. Kelley,so far as it re lated to the silver coinage, was identical with‘ the bill which was prepared at the Treasury Department, and which had passed the Senate, excepting that the latter bill made the silver coin a legal tender for all sums less than $1, while the bill of Mr. Kelley made the silver coins a legal tender for $5 in any one pay ment. The bill was again printed in the Senate on May 29,1872, and referred to the Finance Committee. Senator S h e r m a n , in reporting it back on December 16, 1872, said: “ This bill has, in substance, passed both Houses, except that the Senate bill enlarged and increased the salaries of the officers of the mint; it was passed by the Senate at the session of the last Congress, went to the House, and now, somewhat modified, has passed the House at this Congress, so that the bill has practically passed both Houses of Congress. The Senate Committee on Finance propose a modification of only a single section; but as this is nob the same Con gress that passed the bill in the Senate, I suppose it will have to go through the form of a full reading unless the Senate are willing to take it on the statement of the committee, the Senate already having debated it and passed it.” (Page 203, volume 106, third session Forty-second Congress.) After further debate, on motion of Mr. Cole, the bill was printed in full with amendments. On January 7,1873, it was again reported with amendments and again printed for the information of the Senate. It passed that body on January 17,1873, after a discussion occupying nineteen columns of the Congressional Globe. In the course of the debate Senator S h e r m a n said: “ This bill proposes a silver coinage exactly the same as the French, and what are called the associated nations of Europe, who have adopted the international standard of silver coinage: that is, the dollar [two half-dollars] provided for by this bill is the precise equivalent of a 5-franc piece. It contains the same number of grams of silver, and we have adopted the international gram insteadof the grain for the standard ot our silver coinage. The trade-dollar has been adopted mainly for the benefit of the people of California and others engaged in trade with China. “ That is the only coin measured by the grain instead of by the gram. The in trinsic value of each is to be stamped upon the coin. The Chamber of Com merce of New York recommended this change, and it has been adopted, I be lieve, by all the learned societies who have given attention to coinage, and has been recommended to us, I believe, as the general desire. That is embodied in these three or four sections of amendment to make our silver coinage corre spond in exact form and dimensions and shape and stamp with the coinage of the associated nations of Europe, who nave adopted an international silver coinage.” (Page 672, volume 106, third session Forty-second Congress.) The bill was sent to the House, and on January 21,1873, on motion of Mr. Hooper, it was again printed with amendments, and subsequently committees of conference were appointed, consisting of Messrs. Hooper, Houghton, and MeNeely, of the House, and Senators S h e r m a n , Scott, and Bayard, of the Senate. The reports of the committees of conference were agreed to, and the bill became a law on February 12,1873, substantially as originally prepared at the Treasury. The bill as prepared at the Treasury omitted the silver-dollar piece, and the report stated the fact of its omission three different times and gave the reasons therefor. The silver dollar piece was omitted from the bill as it first passed the Senate. It was also omitted from the bills reported by Mr. Kelley; but in the bills reported by Mr. Hooper a new silver dollar was proposed equal in weight (384 grains) to two of the half-dollars then authorized. The Senate substituted a trade-dollar weighing 420 grains in place of the dol lar of 384 grains, in accordance with the wishes of the dealers in bullion upon the Pacific coast, that being considered by them as the most advantageous weight for a coin to be used for shipment to China and Japan. The weight of the subsidiary silver coin was increased about one-half percent, in value, making the half-dollar, quarter-dollar, and dime, respectively, of the weight of 12£ grams, 6* grams, and 2£ grams, or precisely one-half, one-quarter, and one-tenth, respectively, of the weight of the French 5-franc piece. All of said coins were made a legal tender in nominal value for any amount not ex ceeding $5 in any one payment. The bill was read in full in the Sena’te several times, and the record states on January 9, 1872, that it was read in the House. It was undoubtedly read at other times. The bill was printed separately eleven times and twice in reports made by the Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, thirteen times in all by order of Congress. It was considered at length by the Finance Committee of the Senate and the Coinage Committee of the House dur ing five different sessions, and the debates upon the bill in the Senate occupied SHER 32 sixty-six columns of the Globe and in the House seventy-eight columns of the Globe. The Secretary of the Treasury called the special attention of Congress to the bill in his annual reports for 1870,1871, and 1872. In his report of 1872 he says : “ In the last ten years the commercial value of silver has depreciated about 3 per cent, as compared with gold, and its use as a currency has been discontinued by Germany and by some other countries. The financial condition of the United States has prevented the use of silver as currency for more than ten years, and I am of opinion that upon grounds of public policy no attempt should be made to introduce it, but that the coinage should be limited to commercial purposes, and designed exclusively for commercial uses with other nations. “ The intrinsic value of a metallic currency should correspond to its commer cial value, or metals should be used for the coinage of tokens redeemable by the Government at their nominal value. As the depreciation of silver is likely to continue, it is impossible to issue coin redeemable in gold without ultimate loss to the Government; for when the difference becomes considerable the holders will present the silver for redemption and leave it in the hands of the Govern ment, to be disposed of subsequently at a loss. “ Therefore, in renewing the recommendations heretofore made for the pas sage of the mint bill, I suggest such alterations as will prohibit the coinage of silver for circulation in this country, but that authority be given for the coinage of a silver dollar that shall be as valuable as the Mexican dollar, and to be fur nished at its actual cost.” As a final answer to the charge that the bill was passed surreptitiously, I ap pend, first, a copy of the section in reference to the issue of silver coins as printed in the report of the Treasury Department and as passed by the Senate; second, a copy of the section as reported by Mr. Kelley; third, a copy of the section as reported by Mr. Hooper; fourth, a copy of the section as finally passed by the Senate and agreed upon by the conference committee. The following section was printed in the two reports of John Jay Knox, Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, to Congress; also in Senate bill 859, Forty-first Congress, second session, April 28, 1870; in Senate bill 859, December 19, 1870, and January 11,1871, third session Forty-first Congress, as reported by Mr. Sh e r m a n : “ S e c . 1 5. And be it further enacted, That of the silver coins the weight of the half-dollar, or piece of 50 cents, shall be J92 grains; and that of the quarterdollar and dime shall be, respectively, one-half and one-fifth of the weight of said half-dollars; that the silver coin issued in conformity with the above sec tion shall be a legal tender in any one payment of debts for all sums less than $1 . ” The following section was printed in Senate bill 859, Forty-first Congress, third session, February 25, 1871, and House bill No. 5, Forty-second Congress, first session, March 9,1871, as reported by Mr. Kelley: “ S e c . 1 5 . And be itfurther enacted, That of the silver coins the weight of the half-dollar, or piece of 5 0 cents, shall be 192 grains; and the quarter-dollar and dime shall be, respectively, one-half and one-fifth of the weight of said half-dollar; which coins shall be a legal tender, at their denominational value, for any amount not exceeding $ 5 in any one payment.” The following section was printed in House bill No. 2934, May 29,1872; House bill N o.-1427, February 9,1872, and February 13,1872, Forty-second Congress, secon d session, as reported by Mr. Hooper: “ S e c . 16. That the silver coins of the United States shall be a dollar, a halfdollar or fifty-cent piece, a quarter-dollar or twenty-five-cent piece, and a dime or ten-cent piece; and the weight of the dollar shall be 384 grains; the hall-dollar, quarter-dollar, and the dime shall be, respectively, one-half, one-quarter, and one-tenth of the weight of said dollar; which coins shall be a legal tender, at their denominational value, for any amount not exceeding $5 in any one payment.” The following section was printed in House bill No. 2934, December 16,1872, January 7, 1873, and January 21, 1873, Forty-second Congress, third session, as reported by Mr. S h e r m a n : “ That the silver coins of the United States shall be a trade-dollar, a half-dollar or fifty-cent piece, a quarter-dollar or twenty-five-cent piece, a dime or ten-cent piece; and the weight of the trade-dollar shall be 420 grains troy; the weight of the half-dollar shall be 12^ grains; the quarter-dollar and the dime shall be, respectively, one-half and one-fifth of the weight of said half-dollar; and said coins shall be a legal tender at their nominal value for any amount not exceed ing $5 in any one payment.” The following section was contained in all of the different bills and the coin age act of 1873: “ S e c . 18. And be it further enacted, That no coins, either of gold, silver, or minor coinage, shall hereafter be issued from the mint other than those of the denom inations, standards, and weights herein set forth.” Copies of the different bills may be obtained at the document-room of the Senate. SH E R o
@FedFRASER